ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries 205 From Inside the DLP By Dr. Katharine M. Stokes College and University Library Specialist, Training and Resources Branch, Division of Li­ brary Programs, Bureau of Libraries and E d­ ucational Technology, U.S. Office of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202. By the time you read this you will probably know w hether or not you are a successful ap­ plicant for a Title II-A (H E A ) grant for col­ lege library resources to be spent by June 30, 1972. In spite of the redirection of the pro­ gram to stress assistance to libraries in great need of expanded collections to serve the large numbers of economically disadvantaged stu­ dents on the campuses, over 2,000 applica­ tions for supplemental and basic grants were received from librarians hopeful that they might be among the neediest. There will be a lot of disappointed applicants in th at category as well as among those who tried for Special Purpose grants, since there was only $8,400,000 to be allotted for supplemental and basic grants. For Type A Special Purpose grants there were about 500 applications, and only $550,000 was allotted for distribution to that category. Some of the applications were for $3,000 or less, but most were for over $10,000 with a few for over $100,000. The Type B applications were allotted ap­ proximately $200,000, and the fifty or so that came in amounted to something like $600,000. The sixty Type C’s had to be considered and reconsidered and the final few awarded were scaled down to the remaining $700,000. Fifteen of your colleagues from all over the country (Massachusetts to Washington, North Carolina to Arizona) and from various types of academic libraries ( junior colleges, four-year developing institutions, urban uni­ versities) labored conscientiously to select from the applications with the highest scores those that fitted the announced priorities most close­ ly. The effort to give each applicant every possible consideration was really agonizing, and a remarkable agreement was finally achieved by these librarians from diverse backgrounds. They would have liked to have been able to see you receive a greater amount of money. ■ ■