ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries 174/C&RL News March 1998 ■ C O N F E R E N C E C I R C U I T ACRL at the Midwinter Meeting Actions of the ACRL Board of Directors During the 1998 ALA Midwinter Meeting in New Orleans, the ACRL Board of Directors took the following actions: A C R L go v e rn a n ce C o n firm e d the fo llo w in g conference call votes: To approve m inutes fro m A n n u a l Conference, San Francisco, June 28 and July 1, 1997. To A dopt revised ACRL Bylaws (De­ cember 10, 1997). A second vote to adopt the revised bylaws will be taken before the 1998 ACRL spring ballot is mailed. To approve 1998-99 ACRL priorities. To approve 1998-99 p erform ance indicators. To a p p ro v e m in u te s fr o m B oard conference call December 10, 1997. U p o n r e c o m m e n d a tio n o f the C o n ­ stitution and Bylaws Committee approved: B ylaw s r e v is io n fo r AFAS consisting of changes in wording for Article VI, Section 3A. Bylaws revision for EBSS changing the title of its newsletter editor to Chair of Pub­ lications Committee and adding the listserv moderator and Web page moderator to Ar­ ticle IV, Section (3g). Bylaws revisions for IS to change Ar­ ticle VIII Committees, Section 4 Appoint­ ments, and Article X Vacancies. Extended Cam pus Library Services Section name change to Distance Learning Section. Change will appear on ACRL bal­ lot for the 1998 ALA election for the ECLSS membership to ratify. A C R L com m itte es Created an ACRL Web Task Force w ith a charge to recommend to the Board policy and procedures for the ACRL Web page. A pproved the Executive C o m m itte e’s comments and recommendations to the Racial and Ethnic Diversity Committee re­ port “Diversity Initiatives within ACRL: Recommendations and a Plan of Action,” commended the committee for doing an outstanding job of preparing the report and asked that the Board’s response be for­ warded to the Racial and Ethnic Diversity Committee along with a paragraph that explains the history and origin of the re­ port. Approved a statement drafted by the In ­ stitutional Priorities and Faculty Reward Task Force that defined the kinds of scholarship for which academic librarians should be re­ warded in promotion and tenure reviews and recommended that the Board work with the task force before the ACRL/AAHE fo­ rum in March to fine-tune word choices so that the statement speaks directly to the non-librarian academic community clarify­ ing the academic quality of the scholarly contribution librarians make. L e g is la tio n Approved a legislative agenda for ACRL upon recommendation of the Government Relations Committee. A dopted a re solution fro m the C opy­ right Committee supporting the Ashcroft and Boucher/Campbell bills, “Digital Copyright Clarification and Technology Act” (S. 1146) and “Digital Era Copyright Enhancement Act” (H.R. 3048) encouraging ACRL to make a public expression of support for the legisla- C&RL News March 1998/175■ Resolution on support o f A shcroft and Boucher/Campbell co pyrigh t bill Whereas the proposed bills, “Digital Copyright Clarification and Technology Act” (S. 1146) introduced by Sen. John Ashcroft (R-Missouri) and “Digital Era Copyright Enhancement Act” (H.R. 3048) jointly introduced by Representatives Rick Boucher (D-Virginia) and Tom Campbell (R-California), present the best approach to updating the Copyright Act to meet the challenges of the digital environment while preserving the critical balance between copyright owners and users in the elec­ tronic age, and Whereas the bills include provisions that are essential to libraries if we are to effectively serve our students, scholars, and researchers in the networked environment, Be it resolved, that the ACRL Board publicly express its support for these pieces of legislation, and Be it further resolved, that members of the ACRL Council of Liaisons bring this resolution to their cognate organizations for their consideration, endorsement, and active support. Be it further resolved, that the ACRL Board encourages ACRL members and in­ stitutions to contact their local congres­ sional representatives and encourage them to cosponsor the legislation. tion and to call to action all ACRL members encouraging them to contact their local con­ gressional representatives and asking them to cosponsor the legislation (see above). P ro fe ssio n a l d e v elo p m e n t Approved proposal for RBMS 40th Pre conference, June 21-24, 1999, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Approved proposal for an ACRL Regional Leadership Institute to be held in 1999- Approved proposal from Leadership De­ velopment Committee for an Interactive Leadership Workshop to be offered at the ALA Annual Conference, Washington, D.C. Approved proposal fro m G o vernm e nt Relations Committee to present a program covering NGI and Internet 2 issues at the ALA Annual Conference, Washington, D.C. Requested that the Racial and Ethnic D i­ versity Committee develop a proposal to offer at least ten scholarships for ALA An­ nual Conference registration to minority li­ brarians who are ACRL members, have been in the profession less than five years, and have not attended an ALA Annual Conference. A p p ro v e d ten no n- m e m b e r s c h o la r­ ships at $210 each to enable academic li­ brarians from developing countries to attend the ALA Annual Conference in Washington, D.C., June 25-July 2, 1998, upon the rec­ ommendation of the International Relations Committee. Fin an cial a ctio n s U p o n re co m m e n d atio n o f the Budget and Finance Committee, approved the fol­ lowing changes to the FY 1998 budget: Reduced a llocation fo r the h ig h e r education legislation/policy initiative by a sum of $35,000. Established budget fo r Instru ctio n Section 1998 Preconference “Learning to Teach,” with revenues of $10,728 and ex­ penses of $10,438. Increased by $22,383 the FY 98 alio cation for Planning the National Informa­ tion Literacy Institute. Revised budget for FY 98 Leadership Institute, revenues $30,975 and expenses $30,108. Increased the Sections budget by $698 to accommodate a request from the Extended Campus Library Services Section to print and distribute the Uniform Statisti­ cal Data Form to campuses with distance education programs. Am ended the ACRL C&RL News and Choice magazine budgets to include expen­ diture increases resulting from the increased Unrelated Business Income Tax (UBIT) rate, C&RL News, $12,189, and Choice, $50,083. 176/C&RL News March 1998 ■ Commended ACRL staff for a very suc­ cessful financial year for 1996-97. Stan d a rd s and g u id e lin e s Commended the Extended Campus Li­ brary Services Section for doing an outstand­ ing job to revise the guidelines and requested that the section explore the problem of insti­ tutions that deliver distance learning programs without making adequate provisions for library services to students enrolled in these programs and inform the Board at the 1999 Midwinter Meeting on their plan for studying the prob­ lem and recommend whether there are steps that ACRL can take to address it. Approved revised Guidelines for Ex­ tended Academic Library Services upon rec­ ommendation of the Standards and Accredi­ tation Committee. Librarians value service most A CRL President Lee Hisle’s Midwinter dis­cussion forum “Enduring Values for the New Millennium” began with attendees se­ lecting service as the most important value to academic librarians. At the discussion fo­ rum, attended by approximately 80 people, Hisle outlined why he selected values as his ACRL presidential theme. Next Stan Campbell (Centre College) de­ scribed several recent situations in which large university systems made decisions based on economic and technological fac­ tors. These developm ents, in clu d in g outsourcing entire computing and informa­ tion technology units on campus, have the potential to compromise values held impor­ tant within higher education. Katherine Branch (Anne Arundel Com­ munity College) briefly covered trends within academic libraries, including in­ creased web access and censorship attempts, that bring up questions about values. The majority of the forum was de­ voted to small group discussion of the following two questions: (1) what is the most important value to you as an academic librarian? and (2) What can we do as individuals and institutions, and what can ACRL do, to champion these values? At the beginning of the program, attendees were asked to indicate the three most important values to them as academic librarians, using a check­ list of 11 values. Of the 55 usable responses, service to clientele was selected by 49 percent as the most important value. Intellectual freedom was ranked first by 20 percent of the respondents and diversity of opinion first by 7 percent of the total. The values of pro­ fessional neutrality, confidentiality, and cultural diversity were ranked consistently low or were not selected. Although the poll was small, unscientific and informal, the results open the door for further dis­ cussion and debate about the relative im­ portance of specific values. The d iscu ssio n phase The discussion phase of the forum allowed attendees to explore the theme of values in more depth. The points below are only a few of the fascinating responses that attend­ ees had to the question of the importance of values: • Truth, justice, and integrity are values, but perhaps the themes under discussion (service to clientele, intellectual freedom, etc.) are value-laden concepts. Top values selected by forum attendees (Percentage selecting as 1st‚ 2nd, or 3rd choice) Value 1st 2nd 3rd Service to clientele 49% 13% 4% Intellectual freedom 20% 20% 11% Diversity of opinion 7% 7% 4% Information literacy 5% 13% 18% Preservation 3% 11% 22% Literacy 2% 9% 2% Cultural diversity 0% 2% 4% Equitable access 0% 13% 16% Copyright/fair use 0% 9% 4% Confidentiality 0% 2% 4% Professional neutrality 0% 0% 2% Other 7% 0% 2% C&RL News ■ March 1998/ 177 Explore values at president's program A w ard-w inning essayist, fictio n w riter and critic W illiam G ass will p resen t the k e y n o te ad dress at th e 199 8 ALA Annual C o n fe r e n c e ACRL P re sid en t’s P rogram , “T h e Value o f Values: C h an ges and C on ­ tinuities as We F a c e the New M illennium ” that fo cu se s on the c o r e valu es o f a c a ­ d em ic librarianship. G ass will talk ab ou t his future b o o k Body, Book, a n d Build­ ing, as w ell as to p ics su ch as intellectu al freed om an d libraries as cultural institu­ tion s. T h e program also featu res a v id eo o f a cad em ic librarians discussing issues su ch as in tellectu al freed om , the im p ortan ce o f the fair u se d o ctrin e, literacy, and ser­ v ice to clie n te le . A q u e stio n and an sw er s es s io n with a d iscu ssion p an el o f Ree D e D o n a to (C o lu m b ia U niversity), J o h n U lm sch n eid er (N orth C arolina State Uni­ versity), D e b G ilch rist (P ie rc e C o lleg e), and P ete r H ern o n (S im m o n s G rad u ate S ch o o l o f Library an d In fo rm a tio n S ci­ e n c e ) will com p lete the program. T h e pro­ gram will b e held on Monday, Ju n e 29, 1998, 2 :0 0 -4 :0 0 p.m ., in W ashington, D.C. • Libraries serve as cultural institutions, to p reserv e th e reco rd s o f hu m ankind. • N ew te c h n o lo g ie s ca n n o t interpret in­ fo rm atio n as w ell as librarians. • T h e library h as a role in the life o f the m ind. • H ow should librarians h an d le situations w h e n p e rs o n a l a n d o rg a n iz a tio n a l v alu es conflict? • Sh ou ld e a c h library d ev elo p a s et o f sh a red values? • Are a ca d em ic librarian s giving up o n e o f o u r u n iq u e roles, that o f p reserv ers o f the cultural record , by fo cu sin g on a c c e s s n o t ow nership? • Are libraries lo sin g p art o f the v alu e o f the phy sical record by digitizing it? • D o a c a d e m ic librarian s h av e a n o b li­ g atio n to p rov id e inform ation an d service for o u r n o n -im m ed iate clien tele? P a rtic ip a n ts s ta te d th at c re a tin g ACRL w o rk sh op s o n clarifying an d su p p orting v al­ ues, dissem inating new s ab ou t activities from o u r cam p u ses that highlight valu es, m od er­ ating an o n lin e c o n fe re n c e o n valu es, in ­ c orp o ratin g v alu es statem en ts into th e ACRL strategic plan, an d p erso n a l m en torin g o f n e w librarian s w ou ld b e u seful m eth od s to ch a m p io n valu es. N e xt ste p s T h e 1998 ACRL P resid en t’s Program C om ­ m ittee intend s to fo llo w up o n a su g g estio n from th e foru m that th e form at an d step -b y - step gu id elin es o n rep licating the valu es dis­ c u ssio n forum b e p o sted o n th e ACRL W e b p ag e. A dditionally, C&RL News will featu re c o l­ u m ns ad d ressing v alu es q u estio n s throu gh­ o u t th e sp rin g 1 9 9 8 .— K atherine Branch, director, Anne Arundel Community College Library, kabranch@ m ail.aacc.cc.m e.us Strengthening librarian teaching/learning partnerships Mo r e th a n 5 0 l i b r a r i a n s d is c u s s e d “Looking Ahead: Strength ening Librar­ ian P artnerships in Cam pus T e a ch in g and Learning Initiatives” at th e M idw inter M eet­ ing o f th e ACRL A lliances for N ew D ire c ­ tion s in T e a ch in g and L earning D iscu ssio n G rou p (A llian ces). As libraries and librarian s b eg in to e x ­ p l o r e t h e e d u c a t i o n a l p o t e n t i a l o f th e Intern et regarding th e w ays w e organize and d eliver in struction al serv ices, a n u m b er o f h ig h er ed u ca tio n asso c ia tio n s su ch as the A m erican A sso ciation o f H igher E du cation (AAHE), th e C oalition fo r N etw orked In for­ m ation (C N I), E d u com , an d th e CAUSE LIB/ IT P artnerships C o n stitu en cy G rou p are al­ read y w o rk in g o n issu es su rrou n d in g the integration o f in form ation te ch n o lo g y into cam pu s teach in g and learning initiatives. T h e A lliances D iscu ssio n G rou p w as estab lish ed to provide a v en u e for librarians to ex c h a n g e ideas and g et involved with non -library or­ gan ization s. W hy is th is im p o rta n t to lib ra ria n s? F o r o n e, th e se organizations are creatin g and im p lem en tin g p o lic ies o n a n ation al level (i.e ., the N ational Learning Infrastructure Ini- mailto:kabranch@mail.aacc.cc.me.us 1 7 8 /C&RL News ■ March 1998 tiative and the Digital Library Initiative) that w ill very lik ely b e a ffe ctin g o u r futu res. So m e to p ics currently u n d er d iscu ssion are m erging libraries and IT d ep artm ents and having libraries rep ort to C h ief Inform ation O fficers w h o d o n o t h av e th e MLS. A s e c o n d to p ic is p rep arin g a ca d em ic and resea rch librarians to play in creasingly sig nificant roles in h ig h er ed u catio n and to inform th ese groups o f the valu e and role o f the library in the teaching/learning and the scholarly p rocess, con tin ues to b e a high priority an d strategic goal fo r ACRL. H ow ­ ever, third, and perh ap s m ost im portantly— librarians n eed to b e c o m e involved s o that their think in g is part o f the future o f infor­ m ation m an agem en t. A b rie f o verview o f CNI, E du com , and AAHE, w ith em p h asis o n the sp e cific goals o f th e v arious org anizations, opportu n ities for p ro fessio n al d ev elo p m en t and involve­ m ent, u p com ing conferences/program s, and pu blications o f interest to librarians w as also provided . (T o learn m ore a b o u t th e se m eet­ ings, forum s, and pu blication s, w e strongly urge you to visit the W eb sites; s e e sid eb ar for URLs). T h e group also d iscu ssed the rep ort on th e 199 7 N ational C o n fe r e n c e o n H igher E d u cation , Learning, T e ch n o lo g y and the W ay We W ork p rep ared by Marilyn Myers, h e a d o f the C o llection D ev elo p m en t and B ib liog rap h ic Serv ices at A rizona State U ni­ versity. AAHE sp o n so rs c o n fe r e n c e s and w o rk sh op s that d eal w ith practical to o ls for increasing teaching/learning effectiven ess in sp e cific settings. Current to p ics that w ould b e o f interest to librarians inclu de: 1) T h e AAHE A ssessm ent Forum , w h ich is lo ok in g at “o u tc o m e s a s se s sm en t” in all asp ects o f Example projects needed ACRL’s A lliances fo r New D irections in T e a ch in g and Learning D iscu ssio n G roup is s ee k in g e x a m p les o f in n ov a­ tive p ro je c ts d ev e lo p e d by librarian s that integrate n ew te ch n o lo g ie s in ca m ­ pus teach in g and learning program s. To sh are your story, c o n ta ct the d iscu ssion group chair, Mari Miller, at the U niver­ sity o f C alifornia, B e r k e le y at e-m ail: m m ille r@ lib ra ry .b e rk e le y .e d u . h ig h er ed u catio n ; and 2) d ev elo p in g new m o d els o f in fo rm atio n d eliv ery b a s e d o n c ollab o rativ e learn in g and faculty/librarian partn ersh ips, to m en tion a few . K atie M argolis, d irecto r o f A cad em ic In ­ form ation R eso u rces and T raining at Cornell University, rep o rted o n th e CAUSE LIB/IT m eetin g that o ccu rred D ec. 2 - 5 , 1997, in O r­ land o, and en co u rag ed participants to attend th e D e c e m b e r 8 - 1 1 , 1998, m eetin g that will b e h eld in Seattle. CAUSE is an organization o f colleg e and university professionals, w hich un ites a c a d e m ic librarian s and com p u tin g p ro fessio n als in to o n e organization. T h e big new s this y e a r is that CAUSE an d Edu com have m erged to form THETA (T h e H igher Education T ech n olog y A ssociation) [Ed. note: Se e C&RL News‚ S ep tem b er 1997]. M argolis ack n o w led g ed that m any o f us are c h a llen g ed b y the grow th o f IT organi­ zation s o n o u r c am p u ses and m ay b e fearful o f the lon g-term p ro sp ects for libraries. “T h e form at o f inform ation is ch an g in g, o w n er­ ship is less im portant th an a c c e s s, bud gets are shrinking, an d the rate o f c h a n g e o ften seem s to o v ertak e o u r ability to learn n ew p r o c e s s e s . W e n e e d to l o o k o u r fe a r s squ arely in the fa c e and ta k e a n active role in plan n in g the in ev itable m etam orp h osis o f o u r p r o f e s s i o n — o r g a n iz a t io n s s u c h as THETA, E du com , etc., w ill e n a b le us to do that. We c a n ’t w ait to b e a sk ed to th e d an ce. W e n e e d to stand up and shim m y!” The v irtu a l lib ra ry A s ec o n d p u rp o se for th e A lliances D iscu s­ sion G rou p is to provide a forum for librar­ ians w h o are w ork in g o n integrating IT into cam p u s te a ch in g an d learn in g p ro je c ts to report on their ex p e rie n c e s— their su ccesses, o b sta c les en c o u n tered , lesso n s learned , and c h a llen g es ah ead fo r the “Virtual U niversity” and the “Virtual Library.” S ch elle Sim cox , library in struction c o o r­ d in a to r at C a lifo r n ia S ta te U n iv e rs ity at M o n terey B a y , d e s c rib e d th e p la n s , p ro ­ gram s, an d p rog ress th ere, a cam p u s that o p e n e d its d oors in 1995 and is design ed entirely arou n d th e ed u cation al poten tial o f the Intern et. T h e library w as d esig n ed with a heavily w ired infrastructure, w hich allow ed librarian s to e m p h asize e lec tro n ic reso u rces an d lifelo n g learn in g skills. After e xp lain in g the b a sic con d itio n s underlying th e original mailto:mmiller@library.berkeley.edu C&RL News ■ March 1998 / 179 Organizations of interest American A ssociation o f H igher F‚ciuca- tion: http://www.aahe.org CAUSE LIB/IT Partnerships C onstitu­ en cy Group: http://www.cause.org/ Coalition for N etw orked Inform ation: http://www.cni.org/ Educom : http://educom.edu/ organization, Sim cox described how time, exp erien ce, and their particular environment created new paradigm s for both the organi­ zation, as w ell as instruction. For exam ple, they are now lookin g m ore closely at creat­ ing an extensive distance education program with a m ore structured, progressive skills program, as w ell as W eb-based instruction and future library-based credit classes. An­ other interesting developm ent is the possi­ bility o f the library separating from the IT unit and b ecom in g part o f A cadem ic Affairs, as the n ex t step in their evolution. Sim cox attributes this to the fact that all their librar­ ians are teach in g faculty, providing instruc­ tional services in cen ters outside the library, as w ell as possessing a w ide variety o f tech ­ n o lo g ic a l e x p e r tis e . T h e y p a rtic ip a te in m any cam pus planning com m ittees, m ak­ ing faculty/librarian partnerships a reality at this cam pus. If you are interested in building alliances with higher edu cation organizations, join us at the ALA Annual C on feren ce in W ashing­ ton, D.C. Future topics will b e published in C&RL News. But d o n ’t wait until then— ac­ cep t the “ch allen g e” and start m aking c o n ­ nection s today!— Mari Miller is chair o f the ACRL Alliances fo r New Directions in Teach­ ing and Learning Discussion Group and ref­ erence/instruction librarian and general sci­ ence selector fo r the University o f California, Berkeley Library; e-mail: mmiller®library. berkeley.edu. ULS activities at Midwinter A m essage from the ULS chair T h e University Libraries Section (ULS) has b e e n hard at w ork creating the draft vision and set o f strategic directions that w e present here for your com m ent. N eedless to say, it is an excitin g time to b e chair o f ACRL’s largest section . W e have active and dedi­ cated leaders and m em bers w orking on ULS w ho are already m oving this vision forward through com m ittee w ork and programm ing for our m em bership. T w o su ccessfu l and well-attended discussion m eetings hosted by the Current T op ics Planning Com m ittee and the Librarians in Higher Education/Campus Administration Discussion Group at the re­ c en t Midwinter M eeting in New O rleans e x ­ em plify our efforts to bring tim ely and rel­ evant issues and ideas to university librarians. W e are also reaching out to collaborate with other groups. W e are cosp on sorin g our An­ nual C on feren ce program with the S cien ce and Technology Section. Also, our past-chair, D on Frank, sp earhead ed efforts to propose a chang e in the structure o f ACRL Activities Section Council to include the type o f library section s, thereby im proving our opportuni­ ties for interaction and coordination with all ACRL sections. We invite your com m ents on this draft d ocu m ent w hich w e hop e to finalize at the Annual Conference this summer. We are con ­ tin u ally lo o k in g fo r n ew w ays to c o m ­ m unicate to our m em bership and w elcom e your suggestions.— Lori Goetch, ULS chair and associate director o f libraries fo r public services at the University o f Maryland, e-m ail: lgoetsch@utk.edu D esktop d e livery o f library resources The ULS Current Topics Discussion Group and the LITA Internet Resources Interest Group cosponsored a discussion in New Orleans on “Push and Pull on the World Wide Web: A New Paradigm for Desktop Delivery o f Library R e s o u rc e s.” Push tech n o log y , also called Webcasting, is a process by w hich content providers send information to the computer desktop. This information can b e viewed im­ mediately by the user. Ideally, the technology is event-driven rather than update-driven. Push has been developed to meet the growing de- http://www.aahe.org http://www.cause.org/ http://www.cni.org/ http://educom.edu/ mailto:lgoetsch@utk.edu 180 /C&RL News ■ March 1998 A CRL University Libraries Section's vision T he University Libraries Section (ULS) will strengthen the ability o f university libraries to provide superior services, and will pre­ pare university library personnel for increas­ ingly significant roles in higher education. ULS will develop guidelines and standards for uni­ versity libraries and promote continuous learn­ ing for library staff. ULS will provide leadership in shaping in­ formation and scholarly communication policy through ACRL and ALA, and in partnership with other higher education and information technology groups. ULS will foster the recruit­ ment and retention o f highly qualified and talented people by university libraries, indi­ viduals w ho reflect the diversity found in American society. 1. Provide excellent program m ing for constituents at both the national and re­ gional level. Strategic directions: 1.1 Sponsor programs at con ferences and other forums. 1.2 Extend programming and continuing education opportunities to the local and re­ gional level. ULS will also: — Provide information on successful pro­ grams for possible implementation at the lo­ cal and regional level. — Encourage the use o f teleconferencing and other new technologies to disseminate programs widely. 1.3 Provide support for creative and ef­ fective program planning. 1.4 Devise m ethods to assess the evolving needs o f the m em bership for continuing edu­ cation. 2. Seek cooperative relationships within ACRL and ALA, and with other library or­ ganizations. Strategic directions: 2.1 Work with other ACRL sections to de­ velop joint programs o f interest to university library personnel. 2.2 Work with other ALA divisions to de­ velop joint programs. 2.3 Encourage the establishment o f liai­ sons from ACRL to other library organizations to prom ote increased collaboration. 2.4 Increase involvement in the ACRL Ac­ tivities Section Council. 3. Promote participation in the develop­ ment o f inform ation policy at the na­ tional level. Strategic directions: 3.1 Keep ACRL informed o f issues related to information policy that are o f particular con cern to university libraries, so that they receive prompt attention at the national level. 3.2 Seek m eans to com m unicate with ULS m em bership to encourage more involvement with legislative and other leaders. 3.3 Explore the use o f appropriate elec­ tronic m eans o f delivering information on policy issues to ULS membership. 4. Foster cooperation with university ad­ ministration and teaching faculty on is­ sues of mutual concern. Strategic directions: 4.1 Identify issues o f mutual concern. 4.2 Provide ULS m em bers with opportu­ nities to Ix‚‘gin or contribute to dialogues with university administrators and faculty on these issues. 4.3 Increase interaction with national schol­ arly associations on these issues through col­ laborative programs, joint publication, and other means. 4.4 Promote efforts to ensure recruitment and retention o f a diverse workforce within universities and their libraries. 5. Promote awareness and provide support for university libraries in dealing with the challenges that are unique to them. Strategic directions: 5.1 Identify the major challenges facing university libraries, such as support o f gradu­ ate and professional programs and research collections in an era o f rising costs and evolv­ ing technologies. 5.2 Consider the establish m ent o f task forces to address these issues and report their findings to the Executive Board. 5.3 Assist library schools in developing aca­ dem ic programs to prepare librarians to meet and anticipate the needs o f university librar­ ies and their patrons. C&RL News ■ March 1998/181 mand for modular and custom izable informa­ tion. It is designed to eliminate the need for users to research for information and to obvi­ ate the need for the user to do anything overtly to get information. Push technology not new Amira Aaron, Electronic Services product man­ ager o f Blackw ell’s Information Services, led the discussion with an overview o f the differ­ ent definitions o f Push technology, the major developers o f Push, and som e possible appli­ cations for library services. Aaron began the talk by challenging its title. Push technology is not a “new paradigm,” she claims. Librarians have b e e n pushing information to users for a long time. However, the tech­ nology is new and offers expanded possibili­ ties for library services. Major Push develop­ ers, such as BackWeb, AirMedia, and Marimba’s Castanet are using the technology for such things (in addition to the ubiquitous sports and stocks updates) as virtual software up­ dates, custom er service updates, and gather­ ing information about clients. Participants broke into small groups for the final segm ent o f the discussion to consider the issues and implications o f Push technol­ ogy for their ow n libraries. Som e w ere appre­ hensive about the possible invasion o f patron privacy while others worried that Push can all too easily becom e Shove. However, m ost par­ ticipants found positive library applications for Push, such as new title alerts, overdue and availability notices from circulation systems, and publisher dispatch data. Librarians w ear m any new hats This winter, the ULS Librarians in Higher Edu­ cation Discussion Group continued dialogue, which began at the Annual C onference in San Francisco, considering the diversity o f new roles librarians have on the university campus. Tom Fry, associate director for Public Services at the University o f Denver, moderated the ses­ sion, observing that librarians are “breaking out o f the b o x ” in increasing numbers and taking on administrative responsibilities com ­ pletely outside the library structure. Elaine Didier, associate dean o f the Gradu­ ate School at the University o f Michigan, shared h er experiences o f life “outside the b o x .” In addition to associate dean, she has served the University o f Michigan campus as adjunct as­ sociate professor in the School o f Management and interim director for Academic Outreach. Didier suggested several strategies for prepar­ ing o n eself for expanded administrative posi­ tions. Recognize and explore the breadth and diversity o f your institution, study its “corpo­ rate culture,” and volunteer in the com m u­ nity. T hese activities help to establish a net­ w ork inside and outside the library that will lead to a perception that you are not “just” a librarian. Didier noted that “participation begets influence” and on e thing will lead to another. As her activities and experiences diversified, she was perceived by the administration as a viable candidate for the associate dean position. Learning a new language T h e first ch allen g e many o f th ese positions bring is the n eed to im m ediately m aster a new and unfam iliar “lan gu age” and set o f values. Sarah W atstein, assistant d irector for A cadem ic User Services at Virginia Com m on­ w ealth University, d iscovered this to b e true during her tw o-year tenu re as interim d irec­ tor o f U niversity C om puter Services. W hile savvy ab ou t applications, sh e w as n o t te ch ­ n ic a lly savvy an d , e v en w o rs e , s h e w as “D ilb e rt-illite ra te .” N ev erth eless, sh e w as tap p ed for the responsibility o f coord in at­ ing com p u ter services b e ca u se o f h er his­ tory o f consensus-building activities, her abil­ ity to b a la n c e issues with sensitivity, and h er drive to garner resp ect on cam pu s for u ser s erv ic es. D esp ite the s te e p learn in g curve, Watstein found that she had m uch to offer in this unfamiliar terrain, as libraries and com puting cen ters are both fundam entally service and support organizations operating in rapidly evolving environments. Like the o th er sp eakers, B ill W elburn, as­ sistant d ean o f the G raduate C olleg e at the University o f Iow a, w as offered his p osition w ith o u t p rio r c a m p a ig n in g on his part. Again, this is d ue in part to his involvem ent in cam pu s activities and his p osition as ad ­ ju n ct p ro fe s so r in th e library s ch o o l. Al­ th o u g h h e admits th ere is a potential for drift and isolation in p ositions outside the library, Welburn believes w e must seize these opportunities as they offer unique challenges that can only b e beneficial in the long run. All agreed that the risks associated with this type o f venture are real. There may b e no (Midwinter Meeting cont. on p. 207) B u i l d Y our L e a d e r s h i p T o o l k i t ! An ACRL Leadership Institute Get the practical leadership skills needed for the next millennium. At this institute, you will develop a personal leadership toolkit o f techniques, tactics, and strategies for: * n e g o tia tio n /p e rs u a sio n * im p lem en tin g ch an g e * m otiv atin g and m anaging a team * m aking public p re se n ta tio n s * ru n n in g effective m eetin gs Plenary Presentations Robert W edgeworth, U n iv ersity L ib rarian at th e U n iv ersity o f Illin o is at U rb a n a -C h a m p a ig n , w ill lo o k at lead e rsh ip issues and w h at librarians should d o to be su ccessfu l lead e rs on cam pus. C liff Lynch, D irecto r, C o alitio n fo r N etw o rk ed In fo rm atio n , will ad d ress lead e rsh ip ro les fo r m an ag in g tech n o lo g y . Toolkit Presenters Michael Butler, E x ecu tiv e D irecto r, O H IO N E T Margo Crist, D ire c to r o f L ib raries, U n iv e rsity o f M a ssa c h u se tts Elaine Didier, D irecto r, R e sid en tial and R e se a rc h U n iv ersity P ro g ram s, U n iv ersity o f M ich ig an Thomas Michalak, E x e c u tiv e D irecto r, H arv ard B u sin ess S ch o o l L ibrary Linda Wallace, D irecto r, A L A ’s P u b lic In fo rm atio n O ffice April 30-M a y 1, 1998 The Tremon† Hotel, Boston cosponsored by ACRL's New England Chapter Registration is $ 175 for ACRL and ACRL/New England Chapter members; $225 for ALA members, and $275 for nonmembers. To register, complete the form available on the Web at htfp://www.ala.org/acrl/leadweb3.hfml and send to ACRL. To reserve a room, contact the Tremon† Hotel at: 800-331-9998 and specify you are attending the ACRL Institute. Questions? Contact Tanga Morris, (800) 545-2433 ext. 2514; e-mail tmorris@ala.org http://www.ala.org/acrl/leadweb3.hfml mailto:tmorris@ala.org C&RL News ■ March 1 9 98/2 07 b e e n acquired by the O h io State University (O S U ) C a rto o n R e s e a r c h L ibrary. T h e collection s, approxim ately 1 5 0,000 pounds o f b o x es and files, w ere previously housed in the San Francisco A cadem y o f Com ic Art (SFACA). T he acad em y’s w ell-know n b o o k editing and writing p rojects will con tin u e at an accelerated pace, focu sing on books featuring the w ork o f Elzie Segar and G eorge Herriman. OSU Libraries intend to maintain the intellectual co h e re n c e o f the SFACA materials through its com puterized cataloging system w hile the various w orks are housed in d isperse units in order to place them with existing groups o f sim ilar materials. Transcripts of the Westmoreland vs. CBS trial w ere presen ted to the T ex as T ech University Library’s Vietnam Archive. Larry Berm an, a professor and political science departm ent chairman at the University o f California at Davis, donated the papers to the archive. In a CBS T elevision special, which aired on Jan . 23, 1982, CBS Anchor Mike W allace told how, in CBS’ view, the American military con sp ired to suppress and alter m ilita ry in t e ll i g e n c e a b o u t th e N orth V ietnam ese military. “T he special implicated Gen. William W estm oreland in the conspiracy and cast doubt on his military h o n o r,” said Jam es R. Reckner, director o f the Vietnam Center and a professor o f history at Texas Tech . “Having sought, and not received, an apology from CBS, G en. W estm oreland sued the netw ork to regain his honor. Later CBS settled the case and apologized to Gen. W estm oreland,” said Reckner. Berm an served as a consultant to CBS Television, and at the end o f the trial ob tain ed the com p lete transcript o f the trial and supplementary materials. T h ese original docum ents com prise 48 banker’s boxes o f materials detailing the U.S. involvement in the Southeast Asian conflict. Leon Uris, renowned author of Battle Cry, Exodus, and Trinity, ann ou nced that the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center at the University o f Texas at Austin is to b e the archival repository o f his literary manuscripts. In addition to the novels, Uris has written Ed. note: Send your news to: Grants & Acquisitions, C&RL News, 50 E. Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611-2795; e-mail: ayoung@ala.org. screenplays, coauthored photography books, and contributed stories and articles to many m agazines and anthologies. “Uris is o n e o f the most popular and w idely read novelists America has produced,” said Thom as F. Staley, director o f the Ransom Center. “His extensive contextual research gives his novels a sense o f living presence and authority achieved by few contem porary authors.” ■ (ACRL at the Midwinter. . . cont.from p. 181) im m ediate c olleag u es or m entors and no safety net if administrative priorities change. But the participants also agreed that the re­ wards, such as increased autonom y and re­ sponsibility, the opportunity to develop new skills, and the c h an ce to b e co m e a “citizen o f the university,” m ake the risks worth tak­ ing. Perform ance m easures M od erator B ets y W ilson led the w e ll-a t­ tended ULS Public Services Heads o f Large Research Libraries D iscussion Group. Mary Ja c k s o n and Shirley B ak er first briefed the group on the ILL/DD Perform ance Measures Study. T he study has su cceed ed in identify­ ing “b est p ractice” libraries: th o se libraries w h ose interlibrary loan p ractices have e x ­ perien ced a high rate o f success in timeli­ ness, accuracy, and patron satisfaction. T he study also raised several questions. W hy, for exam ple, d oes the average turnaround time fo r ILL re m a in c lo s e to th e s a m e ra te achieved ten years ago? W ork sh op s to exam in e w hat libraries can do to im prove their ILL practices will b e held after the final report is published this w in ter. W ilso n th e n a c q u a in te d the group with developm ents regarding the pro­ p o sed N ational Inform ation Literacy Insti­ tute. This immersion program, funded in part by ACRL, will fo cu s on the practical and th eo retical issues o f teach in g inform ation literacy. O ther top ics under discussion in­ clu ded p erform ance m easures, assessm ent initiatives, and a review o f the types o f W eb support currently offered in academ ic librar­ ies. A ssessm ent initiatives will again b e un­ der con sideration at the ALA Annual m eet­ ing in W ashington D .C .— Anne Garrison, reference librarian, Georgia Tech Library; e-mail: anne.garrison®ibid.library.gatech . mailto:ayoung@ala.org