ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries C&RL News ■ February 2000 / 7 07 Harvard case study m ethod takes theory and applies it to a “c a s e ”— a docum ented real-life situation. In the vigorous exam i­ nation o f each case, in the small group sessions and in the following class sessions, we identified leadership techniques and analyzed them with a set o f concep tu al tools. As a result, elem ents o f leadership and analytical tools were sharpened like knives sharpened by crossing one blade against the other. This scrutiny gave me an opportunity to look at my core leadership assumptions. In­ cisive discussion and exploration o f case studies exposed the successes and failures o f other leaders. In this atmosphere, I found ideas that would provide powerful help in many challenging areas. T he Harvard Leadership Institute was one of the most rewarding professional de­ velopment experiences I’ve ever had. With a schedule packed with administra­ tive responsibilities, I rarely have time (or take time?) for concerted professional devel­ opment other than professional reading and an occasional workshop. I looked forward to the Harvard program as a time for reflec­ tion, intellectual stimulation, and practical ap­ plications for leadership improvement. I especially liked the idea that the pro­ gram was focused on the director and asso­ ciate director level in academic libraries and was being offered through the Harvard Higher Education Institute in conjunction with ACRL. My mind was set for a quality program and superior faculty, with colleagues in similar situations. I never expected it to exceed my expectations, because they were aimed so high at the outset. I was first stimulated by the readings, es­ pecially the book by Lee Bolman, R efraining O rgan ization s, which was at the core of the program. I nearly finished it all before I ar­ rived in Cambridge and was talking about and recommending it to my associate direc­ tors at Rutgers. It has given me a much broader perspective for decision making and I actually mentally walk through scenarios using the frames! I wasn’t familiar with the case study method as a teaching/learning tool before this program, but I found it wonder­ ful for the group discussions. Reading about I brought back excellent tools for mak­ ing improvements in my leadership and im­ mediately put them to use. The conceptual architecture of “frames” and the process of “reframing” has since help me assess situa­ tions faster and direct my actions much more effectively. I continue to work toward the leadership goals I wrote during the institute. The dialectic of learning occurs in discus­ sions with others. My fellow attendees were open and ready to share their thoughts and ideas in small group discussions, the semi­ nar class, and at the coffeehouses and pubs we visited together in Cambridge. I thank the participating Harvard faculty, the Harvard or­ ganizers, ACRL, and the institute attendees for a profoundly rewarding experience.— D a v id B ilyeu real situations and having a chance to ex­ plore with colleagues what you’d have done in the same situation, and why, with new insights was energizing. The mix of institu­ tional participants from small to large institu­ tions, private to public, added a wonderful diversity to the discussions. While I probably spoke less in the large group because I just enjoyed listening to everyone, I loved our small group discussions for testing ideas and thinking out loud. The opportunity to think seriously about what I do, to be stimulated by ideas and new possibilities, and to reflect on personal goals and mission was luxurious. I think about the experience often. I felt like a sponge just sop­ ping up information. It went too fast and I tried hard to not miss a beat. It was just won­ derful being a student again and being changed through the experience. The program was simply top notch from beginning to end— from the faculty and cur­ riculum, the food and ambience, and the fellowship of interesting colleagues. I have many wonderful memories o f that experi­ ence, not least of which is that paper in my desk that one of our instructors suggested we keep. I look at it regularly. I’m still on track! Thanks to everyone associated with the development and delivery of the program and to my fellow participants for a most re­ warding experience.— M a r ia n n e G au n t (co n tin u es on next p a g e ) 108 / C&RL News ■ February 2000 A u gu st 3 0 , 1 9 9 9 , B u f fa lo S tate C ollege, State University o f N ew York B u ffa lo , N ew York. Som ehow writing this article is indicative o f the change that was effected by attending the first ACRL/Harvard Leadership Institute. Ordinarily the first day o f the sem ester would not afford time to reflect and write. Yet, sym­ bolically I wanted to write on this day to mark the change that six days in Cambridge, Mas­ sachusetts, am ong 81 other colleagues and a supportive and expert faculty and staff can m ake in a mid-career, middle m anager in middle America. Directing libraries can be a lonely pur­ suit. D ecisions in the face o f spiraling infla­ tion are usually decisions to cut traditional print materials, anathema to those o f us who grew up with stately edifices and thousands o f periodical subscriptions; acquiring at least one b o o k per FTE per year was a given. We need to lead and assist in the im plem enta­ tion o f technology. Our decisions also have great impact on the educational outcom es o f our students. Additionally, libraries, as ser­ vice organizations, affect the broadest cam ­ pus constituency. I had been named director just three years ago, and when news about the program at Harvard was brought to my attention, I im­ mediately checked the Web site and applied! The Web site stated, “the program prepares you to answer two key questions: 1) How well-positioned is my organization to m eet current and future challenges? [and] 2) How effective is my own leadership?” These are questions that are very meaningful to me, questions that I very much wanted to explore in a structured fashion. To bolster my resolve, I had heard wonderful things about the Man­ agem ent Developm ent Program and Institute for Educational Management program from colleagues on campus, so I was confident that the exp erience would be positive. I arrived in Cambridge on the 5th o f July in 98-degree w eather with my readings com ­ pleted and a hopeful attitude. We met in the same classroom each day after a morning dis­ cussion with our own small group. G ener­ ally we had three 80-minute classes each day with readings and assignments each night. The curriculum had been crafted to include leadership studies, finance, management, and adult developm ent. We w ere treated to a lovely reception in the Harvard Faculty Club and a festive clam bake in Radcliffe Yard. Con­ versations during the social events ranged ( c o n t in u e d o n p a g e 1 2 0 ) S ig n up fo r the 2000 ACRL/H arvard Le a d e rsh ip In stitu te Academ ic libraries exist in a constantly changing environm ent w ith m any new challenges and many available opportuni­ ties. New demands on academ ic libraries call for fundamental shifts in leadership know -h ow . In re sp o n se to th ese ch a l­ len ges, ACRL is co llab o ratin g with the Harvard Institutes for Higher Education to offer the ACRL/Harvard Leadership Insti­ tute. The goal o f the institute is to increase academ ic library leaders’ capacity to lead and to m anage. Harvard In stitu tes for Higher Education faculty will give special attention to issues such as: • leadership; • organizational strategy; • financial m anagement; • transformational learning; and • planning. The institute is designed for directors o f libraries and those who report directly to them in positions such as associate univer­ sity librarian or assistant library dean. At- tendance would also be useful for individu- als regularly involved in decision-m aking that affects the entire library operation and that involves other important relationships on campus. The 2000 ACRL/Harvard Leadership In­ stitute will be held in Cambridge, Massa­ chusetts, and begins with a reception on Sun­ day, July 30, and concludes on Friday, Au­ gust 4. More details about this exciting institute, including registration information, can be found at http://gseweb.harvard.edu/~ppe/ index.html (select Programs, Higher Educa- tion, then scro ll dow n to lo ca te ACRL/ Harvard Leadership Institute). ■ http://gseweb.harvard.edu/~ppe/ C&RL News ■ February 2000 / 109 120/C&RL News ■ February 2000 sources. A ccess: http://www.dpa.org.sg/DF/ databases.html. E lectron ic j o u r n a ls • D eaf M agazine. Compiles articles o f in­ terest on deafness and files o f information on such topics as cochlear implants. A ccess: http://WWW.Deaf-Magazine.Org/. • D eafN atio n .co m (D e a f n e w s p a p e r). Covers sports, news, classified ads, job mar­ ket, maps to events, religion, mailing lists, and telnet sites o f interest to people with h e a r in g d i s a b il it ie s . A c c e s s : http:// www.deafnation.com/. D iscu ssio n g ro u p s • D eaf N otes. This is an electronic dis­ cussion group on issues of interest to people with hearing disabilities. A ccess: http://www. deafnotes. com/. ■ ( “ACRL/H a r v a r d . . . ” c o n t in u e d f r o m p a g e 108) from sailing to off-site storage to pets to li­ cense agreements. Was it worth it? Yes. In our opening ses­ sion, Cliff Baden assured us that they “would not waste our tim e.” Time is precious and our time was very well invested. I left with a confidence that cam e o f sharing with a diverse cross-section o f academ ic library di­ rectors and upper managers from the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. What did I learn? Foremost, I learned to reframe all major issues: to look at the politi­ cal, human resource, structural, and symbolic aspects of campus and library issues, and to explore solutions that take all four o f these views, or frames, into account. I discovered which frames come naturally and which I need to work on a bit more. I also learned to per­ ceive the leadership of other administrators in my institution using these frames. This helps me in my interactions. I learned about strate­ gic intent and why strategic planning can fall flat, despite the best of facilitators. I learned to laugh and tell stories that get laughs. I learned to take time to think and analyze. I learned to create a secure structure. I learned to pay at­ tention to the context, not just the content. I learned to set standards, have expectations, take risks. Not bad for a five-day institute! ( “The tra in in g . . . c o n t in u e d f r o m p a g e 1 1 3 ) the larger schem e o f things, it is nonetheless a worthwhile experience. As a result o f this internship, one more foreign information cen­ ter is running better and providing better ser­ vice than if this training never took place. Library staff development in this context complements other aspects o f the develop­ ment project o f which information service enhancem ent is an important part. The coor­ I also learn ed fascin atin g things like where Emerson and Thoreau (and Bill Gates, Tommy Lee Jo n e s, and Al G ore) lived as undergraduates. I learned the name o f the luminous green grass growing in my garden from the astounding glass flower exhibit at the Harvard Museum o f Natural History. And I learned that it’s very hard to eat lobster with plastic flatware! I was able to wander in bookstores. I ate dinner in the Henry Jam es House. I learned about the dominant Harvard finance principle o f “each tub on its own bottom .” I met creative librarians, impassioned pro­ fessors, and som e dynamic institute staff whom we all wanted to spirit away to our own cam puses. I met undergraduate and graduate students on the streets o f Cambridge and in the libraries o f Harvard. I am back, I am energized, and I think I have a new approach. The 1999 participants are hoping to have a reunion, since the class bonded so well, and we should have success stories to tell in a year or two. My sincere thanks go to Maureen Sullivan, Jo h n Collins, Althea Jenkins, and Cliff Baden who conceived the program and recruited the ste lla r facu lty: Lee B o lm a n , R obert K e e g a n , Mary L o u ise H a tte n , and Jim Honan.— M aryru tb Pb elps G log ow ski ■ dinator o f the information com ponent reports that visible progress is being made at the in­ formation center and the trainee maintains contact via e-mail. N otes 1. Nicoletta M. Hary and Francesca L. Hary, “Hosting an International Librarian,” C ollege a n d R e s ea r c h L ib ra ries News (March 1995): 162-164. ■ http://www.dpa.org.sg/DF/ http://WWW.Deaf-Magazine.Org/ http://www.deafnation.com/ http://www