ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries October 1 9 9 3 / 5 2 7 D e p artm e n t of Education clarifies access to theses Earlier this year, the Depart­ ment of Education was asked by one institution for a writ­ ten opinion as to w hether the Family E d ucational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA, also k n o w n as th e B u c k le y Amendment) applied to un­ d e rg ra d u a te a n d g rad u a te theses, and w hether theses could be made publicly avail­ able in academic libraries for research purposes. The written response indi­ cated that student theses w ould ordinarily be considered education records under FERPA and generally could not be released without prior written consent by the student. This response was apparently distributed through electronic mail to institutions around the country and was picked up by the media. The regulations implementing FERPA require . . . written con­ sent before releasing a student’s education records or disclosing personally identifiable informa­ tion from such records. The regulations implementing FERPA require an educational institution to obtain written con­ sent before releasing a stu d e n t’s educatio n records or disclosing personally identifiable information from such records. In general, e d u ­ cation records are defined as those directly re­ lated to a student and m aintained by an educa­ tional agency or institution. Since press reports on this issue surfaced this summer, the ALA W ashington Office has been in touch with the D epartm ent’s Family Policy Compliance Office, w hich administers FERPA, to seek clarification. ALA learned that no com plaints have been m ade against any postsecondary institution by any student alleg­ ing that a thesis was improperly disclosed. De­ partm ent officials said they did not before and do not now see a problem with the way schools normally treat theses that are written for publi­ W a sh in g to n H o tlin e Carol C. Henderson cation, and generally do not see the need for schools to change th e w ay they are doing business. A l e t t e r i n t e n d e d to clarify the D epartm ent of E d u c a tio n ’s p o sitio n was se n t on S e p tem b e r 1 by LeRoy S. Rooker, Director of the Family Policy Com­ p l ia n c e O ffic e , to ALA W ashington Office Director Eileen Cooke. Rooker noted th at “in ordinary circum ­ stances FERPA prevents an institution from disclosing or pu b lish in g a student’s written examination or pap er with­ out prior written consent,” except for certain specified exceptions. Nevertheless, Rooker saw the special nature of student theses, and stated: H ow ever, w hile these docum ents are clearly “education records,” as noted in our May 11, 1993, letter on this subject, w e rec­ ognize that u n d erg rad u ate and graduate “theses” often differ in nature from typical student research papers and other educa­ tion records, such as written examinations, in that they are published or otherwise made available as research sources for the aca­ dem ic community through the institution’s library. It remains our understanding that in these circumstances an educational insti­ tution w ould ordinarily have obtained the student’s permission to make his or her work available publicly before doing so, perhaps in connection with notifying the student of specific course or program requirements. Consequently, an institution need not ob ­ tain a student’s signed and dated specific written consent to disclose or publish a the­ sis in the library or elsewhere at the institu­ tion. Neither the statute, the legislative his­ tory, n o r the FERPA regulations require institutions to depart from established prac­ tices regarding the placem ent or disclosure of student theses so long as students have been advised in advance that a particular undergraduate or graduate thesis will be m ade publicly available as part of the cur­ riculum requirem ents. ■ Carol C. Henderson is deputy executive director o f A L A ’s Washington Office; bitnet: cch@alawasb.org mailto:cch@alawasb.org