ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries 142 /C&RL News ACRL Board actions, January 1 9 9 3 Highlights o f the ACRL B oard o f Directors’ M idw inter meetings T he Board of Directors of the Association of College and Research Libraries met twice during the Midwinter Meeting in Denver—on January 24 and January 26, 1993. Prior to these meetings they also held a priority planning ses­ sion with invited leaders of ACRL. A report of this meeting will appear in a future issue of C&RL News. Highlights of their Board meetings are as follows: Set dates for ACRL’s 8th National Confer­ en ce. The Board voted to hold ACRL’s 8th National Conference in 1997, changing the cycle for the 1997 conference to every two years from every three years. A number of sites are being considered. The 7th National Conference will be held in Pittsburgh, March 29-April 1, 1995. Approved tw o 1993 p reconferences. ACRL’s Board added two preconferences to its offer­ ings prior to the 1993 ALA Annual Conference in New Orleans. A half-day workshop, “Creat- Guideline on collective bargaining The policy of the Association of College and Research Libraries is that academic li­ brarians shall be included on the same basis as their faculty colleagues in units for col­ lective bargaining. Such units shall be guided by the standards and guidelines pertaining to faculty and academic status of the Asso­ ciation of College and Research Libraries.— Developed by the ACRL A cadem ic Status Committee; approved by the ACRL Board o f Directors a n d the ALA Standards Committee a t the 1993 M idwinter Meeting. ing the Virtual Library: or Re-engineering the A cadem ic Library,” org an ized by Laverna Saunders, University of Nevada, and sponsored by ACRL’s Education and Behavioral Sciences Section, will provide an overview of the virtual library, administrative concerns, and staff train­ ing issues. ACRL will sponsor a full-day preconference, “Navigating and Navigators: Research and De­ velopment in Navigational Tools and Services for the Internet,” developed by the Coalition for Networked Information, discussing research and development in navigational tools and ser­ vices for the Internet. The session will include a panel of experts which will feature the de­ velopers of such tools as Archie, WAIS, Go­ pher, and Z39-50. Both of these preconferences will be held Friday, June 25. ACRL will also be offering th ree other preconferences in New Orleans: “Special Col­ lections in the 21st Century: How Others See Us and How We See Ourselves,” sponsored by the Rare Books and Manuscripts Section; “Lead­ ership and Technological Change: A Call for Vision, a Call to Action,” sponsored by ACRL, LAMA, and LITA; and “Science Reference Ser­ vice: An Introduction for the General Reference Librarian,” sponsored by the Science and Tech­ nology Section. (Ed. note: details about these preconferences may be fo u n d on pages 000. in this issue.) Established discu ssion group o n Electronic Text Centers. This group will cover any topic related to electronic texts and libraries, includ­ ing collection policies, selection of materials cataloging, reference services, instruction, com­ puter facilities, and lending policies. Marianne Gaunt of Rutgers University will chair this group. A pproved a p o licy statem ent o n social is ­ sues. The policy statement prepared by a task force headed by Cerise Oberman delineates three criteria which should be met when the ACRL Board of Directors takes action on so­ cial, political, and economic issues. See the March 1 9 9 3 /1 4 3 accompanying sidebar for the full text o f the statement. S usp en ded ACRL’s statem ent o n e le c tio n cam paigning. This statement, approved by the ACRL Board at its meeting during the 1992 ALA A nnual C o n feren ce, attem p ts to lim it the politicization of ACRL elections. ALA’s Policy M onitoring Committee, chaired by Norm an Horrocks, has questioned the statement, stat­ ing that it seeks to restrict the freedom of ex­ pression of candidates and their supporters. In a correspondence to the ALA Executive Board Administrative Subcommittee, Horrocks cited ALA Policies 53-1.13, 54.16, and ALA’s Priority Areas and Goals Policy 1.3 Area C as specifi­ cally conflicting with the statement. The ACRL Executive Committee will review the statement and make a recommendation to the full ACRL Board at the 1993 Annual Conference. A pproved Standards fo r Ethical Conduct. “Standards for Ethical Conduct for Rare Book, Manuscript, and Special Collections Librarians, w ith G uidelines for Institutional Practice in Support of the Standards,” 2nd ed., 1992, was approved by both the ACRL Board and the ALA Standards Committee. The full text of the stan­ dards will be printed in C&RL News this spring. A pp roved “G u id elin es o n C o llective Bar­ g a in in g .” See the accompanying sidebar for the full text of this statement prepared by ACRL’s Academic Status Committee. ACRL policy statement on social issues Academic and research libraries, and their parent institutions, are inextricably linked to the social, political, and economic fabric in w hich they exist. They are, therefore, som e­ times drawn into debate, action, and resolu­ tion o f many important issues affecting those institutions. ACRL is the national organization of the academic and research library profes­ sion. Its mission, as stated, is . . to foster the profession of academic and research li- brarianship and to enhance the ability of aca­ demic and research libraries to serve effec­ tively the library and information needs of current and potential library users.” As the elected leadership o f ACRL, the ACRL Board of Directors has a responsibility to formulate policy on issues which directly impact ACRL’s ability to carry out its mission and is entrusted with the task of determining w hich social, political, or economic issues merit action from ACRL. The ACRL Board of Directors is responsible to the membership and recognizes and values the diversity of opinions of individual members. The ACRL Board of Directors should make policy decisions, plan conferences, and struc­ ture association activities so as to adhere to the organization’s established mission and goals while offering opportunities for expres­ sion and education of ACRL’s diverse mem­ bership. Therefore, the ACRL Board of Directors, in deliberating social, political, and economic issues, should take action only w hen those issues meet the following criteria: 1) Issues are of fundamental importance to the profession of academic librarianship; 2) Issues are directly and clearly identi­ fied as consistent with the mission and goals of ACRL and ACRL’s Strategic Plan; and 3) Issues are ones for which ACRL is rec­ ognized as an authoritative and know ledge­ able source by both its membership and the national community (such as issues having to d o with intellectual freedom and access to information). The ACRL Board of Directors, drawing from the knowledge base of the discipline of library and information science, its research and practice, and from the principles and eth­ ics of librarianship, should determine and pri­ oritize appropriate actions in response to is­ sues m eeting th ese criteria. Actions may include, but are not limited to, policy state­ ments, legislative initiatives, economic sanc­ tions, and educational programming. Actions should have clearly stated and defined ob­ jectives, and should provide a basis for evalu­ ating the effectiveness as well as the fiscal implications of the decision. All actions should be in full accordance with both the letter and the spirit of tile policies o f ACRL and ALA. 144 / C&RL News Mary Sue Ferrel, Lori Arp, and David Walch discuss strategies during the ACRL priority planning session at the Midwinter Meeting. A ccepted the recom m endations o f th e Pub­ lications Task Force. Seven recommendations on how ACRL could proceed to meet mem­ bers’ needs for information were included in the task force report presented by chair Michael Kathman. The ACRL Executive Committee will explore means of implementing the recommen­ dations at its spring meeting. A p p ro v ed a re v ise d s e c t io n n e w s le tte r p olicy. This new policy, developed by the ACRL Publications Committee, in consultation with ACRL section and new sletter editors, separates policy from proce­ dures and will be distributed to sec­ tion newsletter editors, section chairs, and vice-chairs, as well as added to the ACRL Guide to Policies a n d Pro­ cedures. Approved three 1994 p reconfer­ en ces. The Board approved plans for RBMS to hold its 35th preconference, June 21-24,1994, in Miami. The topic is “From Collector to Donor: Devel­ opm ent Issues in Rare Books and Special C ollections.” T he Biblio­ g rap h ic In stru ctio n S ection also g a in e d a p p ro v a l fo r a o n e -d a y preconference, July 24, 1994, tenta­ tively titled “Integrating Active Learn­ ing into Library Instruction: Practical Information for Immediate Use.” The Science and Technology Section re­ ceived permission to cosponsor, with the As­ sociation for Library Collections and Technical Services (ALCTS), a one-day preconference in Miami on the bibliographic control of confer­ ence proceedings. Established a task force o n electronic com ­ m un ication . The task force’s charge is: “to gather and disseminate information on how academic librarians and libraries can access the New fiscal policies approved The ACRL Board of Directors approved two new fiscal policies. The first deals with adminis­ trative fees for awards. The text of the policy is: All proposals for new awards must clearly indicate that the award will have financial sup­ port either from a vendor or from the establish­ ment of an endowment. Recurring funding for an award must include an amount to cover the costs of the award's administration. This ad­ ministrative funding will be used for such pur­ poses as publicity and reimbursement of ACRL staff time. The amount of administrative fund­ ing needed for an award should be determined in consultation with ACRL staff prior to the es­ tablishment of the award. After establishment of the award, staff will annually adjust the admin­ istrative fee in consultation with the award vendor. The second policy delineates categories of expenses not eligible for ACRL funding: Chapters may not use ACRL basic services funding for the following activities: coffee, meal, or reception expenses; travel expenses for chap­ ter members; speaker expenses (travel, hono­ raria, etc.) for members and librarians living in the meeting region; flowers for conference pro­ grams; computer software or hardware; film or film development; audiovisual production; or purchase of capital equipment. Sections may not use ACRL basic services funding for: coffee, meal, or reception expenses; speaker expenses; travel expenses; flowers for conference programs; audiovisual productions;- film or film development; computer software or hardware. Internet and to recommend to the ACRL Board of Directors an operational and financial plan for the use of electronic communications to enhance and replace printed publications as appropriate. The task force (which has not b een appointed as of this writing) will turn in a preliminary report at the 1994 Midwinter Meeting and a final report at the 1994 Annual Conference. Approved several recom m en dation s from the Budget and Finance Committee. Among the recommendations approved were: 1) make $12,367 available from the ACRL fund balance to finance specific ACRL projects in FY 1993; 2) request approval from the ALA Executive Board to transfer $10,000 from the ACRL fund balance into the ACRL endowment; 3) provide funding in the FY 1994 budget for two eight-page section newsletters for those sections currently producing newsletters; 4) allocate $100,000 during FY 1993 and FY 1994 for planning the Seventh ACRL Na­ tional Conference in 1995 in Pittsburgh. (Ed. note: The 1994 budget will undergo a n ­ other review; fin a l approval will be m ade a t the Tuesday afternoon meeting o f the ACRL Board o f Directors at the 1993 ALA A n n u a l Confer­ ence in New Orleans.) The Board also approved two fiscal policies recom m ended by Budget and Finance. One deals with nonfundable activities and the other with administrative fees for awards. These poli­ cies are presented in an accompanying sidebar and will be incorporated into the next edition of the ACRL Guide to Policy a n d Procedures. A pp roved th e M em bersh ip C om m ittee’s requ est to co n d u ct a su rvey in FY 1994. The Board approved the recommendation from Membership Committee Chair Andrea Hoffman to conduct a membership survey in FY 1994 and charged the Executive Committee with considering how it could be implemented in a cost-effective manner. ■ University Libraries Section—Midwinter report As usual, Midwinter in Denver was a busy working session for the University Libraries Section of ACRL. The Communications Committee submit­ ted a detailed job description of the liaison to C&RL News to the Organization and Bylaws Committee. This description was approved as read by that committee and the Executive Committee. The Policy and Planning Committee pre­ sented an updated analysis of the ULS Con­ ference Programs. The programs seemed to have shifted in emphasis from management and personnel issues to a broader outlook including library service, an appreciation for international issues, and deeper examination of the environment of higher education. Speakers have also been more represen­ tative of the section as a whole. More innova­ tion in the formats for the programs is still seen as an area for improvement. The Current Topics Discussion Group pre­ sented “Applying TQM in Academic Librar­ ies: Lessons Learned Along the Way,” with featured speakers Mary Reichel of Appalachian State University, Rao Aluri of Parkway Pub­ lishers, Karyle Butcher of Oregon State Uni­ versity, and Jane Conrow of Arizona State Uni­ versity. The discussion group considered the successes and problems of applying Total Quality Management (TQM) in a nonprofit setting, and all speakers emphasized the ne­ cessity of commitment from top management in the college o r university setting if the projects are to succeed. Several of the speak­ ers presented analysis of the results of the experiment in TQM on their campuses. Some of the lessons learned included understand­ ing the total TQM process, decision-making c o m m itm e n t, c o m m itm e n t to tr a in in g throughout the process, understanding that the process takes time, being prepared to d e a l. with conflict, making the little changes that can be made easily first, and overcoming fear of change and fear of the negative. Plans for the future were an important part of the work at Midwinter. Look for confer­ ence programs at ALA Annual from several of the discussion groups and a great slate of nominations for section officers. More later from your C&RL News liaison—Mary Munroe, Georgia State University March 1 9 9 3 /1 4 5