ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries 100 Adadem ic L ib ra rie s and the White House Conference— Two Statem ents The fo llo w in g sta tem en ts b y tw o ca ndidates f o r A L A president w ere s u b m itte d at the request o f the A C R L ad hoc C om m ittee on th e W h ite H ouse C onference, Joseph A . Boisse, chair. C o m m unication should b e th e p rim e co ncern o f th e academ ic librarians in th e series o f gover­ n o rs’ c o n fe re n c e s le a d in g to th e W h ite H o u se level g ath erin g in 1979. T h e p u rp o se o f th is e n ­ tire effort is to en a b le th e lay pu b lic to u n d e r­ stand and articulate, in th e ir term s, th e n e e d for inform ation resources d elivery. T h e articulation, if it is e m p h atic and forceful, could have a p o si­ tive im pact on federal a n d sta te legislative re a c ­ tion for years to come. I t will b e fairly easy for th e lay public to id e n ­ tify w ith som e o f th e aspects o f library service, particularly as it relates to school-age youth and special social groupings. I t will b e m ore difficult to relate to th e academ ic libraries. And it is im ­ p o rtan t th at academ ic lib ra ry resources b e u n d e r­ stood by th e lay public. It is im p o rtan t th at th ey u n d erstan d how th o se reso u rces can have an ef­ fect upon th e econom ic a n d social w elfare of our society. It is im p o rtan t th a t th e lay public b e able to articulate how research a n d d e v elo p m en t tran s­ late into problem -solving ability for all o f society, thus justifying an d repaying any initial in v estm en t in resources and personnel. A cadem ic lib ra ria n s m u s t b e a p a rt o f th e s e dialogues. T hey m ust b e articulate. T hat articu la­ tion m u st b e s trip p e d o f jarg o n and p e tty c o n ­ cerns so th at w e can deal straightforw ardly w ith lay concerns. If society is to b eg in to solve its problem s, as how to survive in a world o f finite resources, m em b ers o f society m ust u n d e rsta n d clearly th at th e y m ust begin to m ine th e o n e in ­ finite resource o u r technological society has … in fo rm atio n . A cad e m ic lib ra ria n s m u st in sp ire confidence th at libraries can b e geared to provide quick, efficient, an d effective re tu rn s th at will be profitable to all o f society. It m eans fast and d e d i­ c a te d in v o lv e m e n t fro m t h e a c a d e m ic lib ra ry com m unity. And ju d g in g from how often th e se af­ fairs are offered to society, it may well b e now or n e v e r . — G e r a ld R. S h ie ld s , A s s i s t a n t D e a n , School o f In fo rm a tio n a n d L ib ra ry Studies, State U niversity o f N e w Y o rk at B uffalo. ■■ S cheduled for fall 1979, th e W h ite H ouse C o n ­ fe re n c e o n L ib ra ry a n d I n fo rm a tio n S e rv ic e s , p re c e d e d by fifty-six state, territo rial, and special conferences, offers us an u n p aralleled o p p o rtu n ity to focus b o th legislative an d citizen a tten tio n on th e broad range o f c u rre n t and fu tu re inform ation n eed s o f A m erican society. To realize this o p p o r­ tunity, academ ic librarians n e e d to b e d irectly in­ volved, b o th individually a n d th ro u g h th e ir o r­ ganizations, in id e n tify in g u rg e n t a g e n d a ite m s for b o th th e sta te and national conferences. W e n e e d to b e ready as well to offer viable proposals for co n sid eratio n by lay d e le g a te s, state legisla­ tu res, and th e C ongress. O u r objective should be to lay th e legislative foundations at state and n a­ tional levels for a c o h e re n t, co o rd in ated , c o m p re ­ h en siv e national lib ra ry a n d inform ation policy th a t ex p lic itly re c o g n iz e s t h e re s p o n s ib ility o f g o v e r n m e n t to a s s u re fu ll, e ffe c tiv e ac c e ss to books, journals, m edia, a n d inform ation. Forceful p re se n ta tio n o f th e special concerns o f academ ic lib ra rian s a n d th e ir c lie n te le s will b e essential. Critical q u estio n s o f pu b lic policy c e n ­ tering on th e design, funding, and op eratio n of b ibliographic an d re s o u rc e -sh a rin g netw orks r e ­ q u ire elucidation. T he co p y rig h t issue, for exam ­ ple, should b e re sta te d , not as a m ore technical d e b a te b e tw e e n c o m p e tin g p riv a te a n d in s titu ­ tional in terests, b u t as a q u estio n to which legis­ lators can relate as advocates for th e access rights o f all citizens. T h e federal responsibility for c re a ­ tion o f co m p re h e n siv e b ib lio g rap h ic data bases, readily accessible at th e local level and linked to an effective delivery system , re q u ire s clear defini­ tion. At both federal and sta te levels, coordina­ tion is n e e d e d (1) to assu re th a t no library is d e ­ n ie d n e tw o rk access, (2) to r e s tr u c tu re lib ra ry fu n d in g so th a t th e c o m m u n ity o f su p p o rt b e ­ com es coterm inous w ith th e com m unity o f users, and (3) to in su re ongoing collection d ev elo p m en t, m a in te n a n c e , a n d p r e s e r v a tio n in th e n a tio n ’s academ ic and research libraries. T h e focus of th e sta te a n d W h ite H ouse co n ­ fere n ces m ust no t b e on p o lite rh e to ric b u t on constructive d e b a te on th a t m ost critical qu estio n o f all—w hat p rio rity will A m erica give to m eetin g th e inform ation n e e d s o f all its citizen s in th e co n tex t o f a c ro w d e d n atio n al social a g en d a?— Thom as J. G alvin, D ean, G ra d u a te School o f L i­ b ra r y a n d In fo rm a tio n S cien ces, U n iv e rsity o f P ittsburgh. ■■