sept07b.indd ACRL standards & guidelines Research competency guidelines for literatures in English Outcomes for undergraduate English or American Literature majors Prepared by the ACRL Literatures in English Section Planning Committee Purpose of the guidelines To aid students of literatures in English in the development of thorough and productive research skills To encourage the development of a com­ mon language for librarians, faculty, and students involved with research related to literatures in English To encourage librarian and faculty collab­ oration in the teaching of research methods to students of literatures in English To aid librarians and faculty in the develop­ ment of instructional sessions and programs To assist in the development of a shared understanding of student competencies and needs To aid librarians and faculty in the devel­ opment of research methods courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels Because teaching methods, course con­ tent, and undergraduate requirements vary by institution, librarians and faculty may apply these guidelines in different ways to meet the needs of their students. For guidelines on helping students develop general research skills, librarians and faculty may refer to the “ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education” at www. ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationlit­ eracycompetency.htm. Introduction Most research in literary studies begins with the text, whether it is a paperback novel, the electronic text of a poem on an author’s Web site, or an illuminated manuscript in a library’s collection. Educators encourage students to gain a deeper understanding of a text by exploring the context of the writing and the interpretations of others, and by developing and supporting their own interpretations. Limited only by their imaginations, students face almost endless opportunities for inter­ pretation of a text. Research plays an indispensable role in the textual discovery process for students. Good research skills help the literary explorer learn more about the author and the author’s world, examine scholarly interpretations of the text, and create new studies and interpretations to add to a body of knowledge. Sometimes the goals of textual discovery and interpreta­ tion can get lost in the minutiae of database searching and conforming to specifi c citation styles. However, it is important for librarians and other educators to remember these goals when helping students develop the research skills necessary for literary exploration. Outcomes for undergraduate English or American Literature majors I . U n d e r s t a n d t h e s t r u c t u r e o f i n - f o r m a t i o n w i t h i n t h e f i e l d o f l i t e r a r y research: I.1 Differentiate between primary and secondary sources I.1.i. Learn to discover and use primary source materials in print and in digital reposi­ tories, e.g., ECCO and EEBO I.2 Understand that literary scholarship is produced and disseminated in a variety of formats, including monographs, journal ar­ ticles, conference proceedings, dissertations, reference sources, and Web sites C&RL News September 2007 526 I.3 Learn the significant features (e.g., series title, volume number, imprint) of different kinds of documents (e.g., journal articles, monographs, essays from edited collections) I.4 Differentiate between reviews of liter­ ary works and literary criticism I.5 Understand the concept and signifi cance of peer­reviewed sources of information I.6 Understand that literary texts exist in a variety of editions, some of which are more authoritative or useful than others I.7 Understand the authorship, produc­ tion, dissemination, or availability of literary production. This includes understanding the meanings and distinctions of the concepts of editions, facsimiles, and authoritative editions II. Identify and use key literar y r e- search tools to locate relevant infor ma- tion: II.1 Effectively use library catalogs to identify relevant holdings at local institu­ September 2007 527 C&RL News “Research Competency Guidelines for Literatures in English” was fi rst developed for use within the Literatures in English Section (LES) of ACRL. Although based on framework of the “ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education” (2000), these guidelines address the need for a more specifi c and source­ oriented approach within the discipline of English literatures, including a concrete list of research skills. The original list was compiled by Anne Jordan­Baker (Elmhurst College). The guidelines were further de­ veloped by the ACRL Literatures in English Section Ad hoc Committee on Literary Research Competencies. On December 10, 2001, the draft guide­ lines were posted to LES­L, the electronic discussion group, for comments.A revision based on those comments was discussed at the 2002 ALA Midwinter Meeting. The guidelines were also published in the fall 2002 issue of “Biblio­Notes,” the LES newslet­ ter, and readers were encouraged to submit comments.A draft based on all information and comments to date was posted to the LES­L group for further review on April 12, 2002. A final draft was presented at the 2002 ALA Annual Conference and was approved by the LES Executive Committee.An updat­ ed version of the 2002 draft was distributed to the LES­L members and the Information Literacy Advisory Committee as well as posted on the ACRL Web site. At the 2005 ALA Midwinter Meeting, a hearing was held and the document was further revised to reflect the advice received. The “Research Competency Guidelines for Literatures in English” draft has been under review and revision during the years in which ACRL was developing policies and procedures for subject­specifi c information literacy standards. Because of the indepen­ dent development of these guidelines and ACRL policies, the format and framework of guidelines do not follow the current pat­ terns of information literacy standards. The guidelines draft document has served primarily to facilitate the collabora­ tion of teaching faculty with subject librar­ ians to create effective teaching structures for literary research. An ACRL roundtable discussion at the 11th ACRL National Con­ ference is just one example of many in which the subject librarians have shared their success in using the guidelines to improve communication with the faculty they serve. ACRL Literatures in English Section Ad hoc Committee on Literary Research Competencies (1999­2001): Heather Martin, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Chair; Austin Booth, University at Buffalo, SUNY; Charlotte Droll,Wright State University; Lou­ ise Greenfield, University of Arizona; Anne Jordan­Baker, Elmhurst College; Jeanne Pavy, University of New Orleans; Judy Reynolds, San Jose State University—ACRL Literatures in English Section Planning Committee Chair Kathleen Kluegel, University of Il­ linois at Urbana­Champaign About the guidelines tions and print and online catalogs and bibliographic tools to identify holdings at other libraries II.2 Distinguish among the different types of reference works (e.g., catalogs, bibliographies, indexes, concordances, etc.) and understand the kind of informa­ tion offered by each II.3 Identify, locate, evaluate, and use reference sources and other appropriate information sources about authors, critics, and theorists II.4 Use subjective and objective sourc­ es such as book reviews, citation indexes, and surveys of research to determine the relative importance of an author and/or the relevance of the specifi c work II.5 Use reference and other appro­ priate information resources to provide background information and contextual information about social, intellectual, and literary culture II.6 Understand the range of physical and virtual locations and repositories and how to navigate them successfully II.7 Understand the uses of all avail­ able catalogs and services I I I . P l a n e f f e c t i v e s e a r c h s t r a t e - g i e s a n d m o d i f y s e a r c h s t r a t e g i e s a s needed: III.1 Identify the best indexes and databases III.2 Use appropriate commands (such as Boolean operators) for database searches III.3 Identify broader, narrower, and related terms or concepts when initial searches retrieve few or no results III.4 Identify and use subject terms from the MLA International Bibliography and other specialized indexes and bibli­ ographies III.5 Identify and use Library of Congress subject headings for literature and authors IV. Recognize and make appropriate use of librar y ser vices in the research process: IV.1 Identify and use librarians and refer­ ence services in the research process IV.2 Use interlibrary loan and document delivery to acquire materials not available at one’s own library IV.3 Use digital resource service centers to read and create literary and critical docu­ ments in a variety of digital forms V. Understand that some infor mation sources are more authoritative than oth- ers and demonstrate critical thinking in the research process: V.1 Know about Internet resources (e.g., electronic discussion lists, Web sites) and how to evaluate them for relevancy and credibility V.2 Differentiate between resources pro­ vided free on the Internet and subscription electronic resources V.3 Develop and use appropriate criteria for evaluating print resources V.4 Learn to use critical bibliographies as a tool in evaluating materials VI. Under stand the technical and ethical issues involved in writing research essays: VI.1 Document sources ethically VI.2 Employ the MLA or other appropri­ ate documentation style VI.3 Understand the relationship be­ tween received knowledge and the produc­ tion of new knowledge in the discipline of literary studies VI.4 Analyze and ethically incor­ porate the work of others to create new knowledge V I I . L o c a t e i n f o r m a t i o n ab o u t t h e literary profession itself: VII.1 Access information about graduate programs and specialized programs in fi lm study, creative writing, and other related fields, and about workshops and summer study opportunities VII.2 Access information about fi nancial assistance and scholarships available for literary study and related fi elds C&RL News September 2007 528 VII.3 Access information on careers in literary studies and use of these skills in other professions VII.4 Access information on professional associations References Altick, Richard D., and John J. Fenster­ maker. The Art of Literary Research. 4th ed. (New York: Norton, 1993). “Infor mation Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education” (Chi­ cago, IL: ACRL, 2000). 22 March 2007, w w w . a l a . o r g / a l a / a c r l / a c r l s t a n d a r d s /informationliteracycompetency.htm. Gibaldi, Joseph. MLA Handbook for Writ­ ers of Research Papers. 6th ed. (New York: Modern Language Association, 2003). Grafstein, Ann. “A Discipline­Based Ap­ proach to Information Literacy.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 28 (2002): 197–204. Jones, Cheryl, Carla Reichard, and Kouider Mokhtari. “Are Students’ Learn­ ing Styles Discipline Specifi c?” Community College Journal of Research & Practice 27 (2003): 363­375. Leckie, Gloria J. “Desperately Seeking Citations: Uncovering Faculty Assumptions about the Undergraduate Research Pro­ cess.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 22 (1996): 201­208. Literary Research: LR. College Park, MD: Literary Research Association, 1986­1990. Literary Research Newsletter. Brockport, N.Y.: Literary Research Newsletter Associa­ tion, 1976­1985. Pastine, Maureen. “Teaching the Art of Literary Research.” Conceptual Frameworks for Bibliographic Education: Theory into Practice. Ed. Mary Reichel and Mary Ann Ramey. Littleton, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited, 1987. 134­44. Reynolds, Judy. The MLA International Bibliography and Library Instruction in Lit­ erature and the Humanities.” Literature in English: A Guide for Librarians in the Digital Age. Ed. Betty H. Day and William A. Wort­ man. Chicago: ACRL, 2000. 213­247. September 2007 529 C&RL News www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards