June 2010 311 C&RL News Freshmen and other migratory birds— How differentiated are our patrons? It is commonplace that academic libraries serve multiple communities: taken as groups, faculty, students, and members of the general community have different wants and expec- tations. We all understand that some of the resources we offer are intended to help some of these groups much more than others. We expect that some resources—Mid- dle English dictionaries, databases for searching chemical structures, or invest- ment spreadsheets full of betas and other arcane measures—will appeal only to sophisticated specialists, while other re- sources such as InfoTrac’s OneFile or EBSCO’s Academic Search Complete will have “something for everybody,” especially if that “everybody” is an undergraduate. It makes sense then that as the popu- lation of our campuses changes over the course of the year, the mix of library resources most in demand will change. That demand for the most basic, general databases falls when our students are away on vacation surely qualifies as the sort of unsurprising finding that journalists deri- sively label “dog bites man.” The point of this small study is briefly to demonstrate just how differently the library is used over the course of the year, presumably due to changes in campus subpopulations, and to reflect on what this means for library services. Although the existence of these dif- ferences will come as no surprise, their extent may be unexpected and may justify some thought about how best to serve our highly disparate subpopulations of users. The data We have tracked the use of our online data- bases at Virginia Tech since 2001, and cur- rently record the university’s usage of 199 resources. Depending on vendor’s “push” or “pull” technologies, we receive statistics via e-mail or visit the administrative modules of vendors’ Web sites. Naturally the technologies involved in this work have changed, and we have seen other changes such as the evolution of the COUNTER standards and the appear- ance of third-party vendors (such as Scholarly Stats or SerialsSolutions) that gather and pres- ent statistics for a variety of our resources. Since the beginning we have translated our vendor or publisher reports into “documents” (downloads), “searches,” or “sessions,” and tracked only the one most appropriate metric among those available. All of our tracking is of monthly data. While this account of Virginia Tech’s prac- tices may make it sound as if we possess nearly a decade’s worth of impeccable time series data ripe for any kind of analysis, those who are involved in tracking their own institution’s data will understand that this is not the case. We cancel some databases. Others combine, split, or change their scope. Vendors forget to report, Web sites change and lose their ability to report data for months at a time, publish- ers switch from one metric to another, and in general Murphy keeps himself busy. Paul Metz Two universities in one place Reflections on seasonal variations in the use of library resources Paul Metz is assistant to the dean for special projects at Virginia Tech, e-mail: pmetz@vt.edu © 2010 Paul Metz Enhance your online reference collection in Organic Chemistry Online access provides a huge range of benefi ts to library customers, researchers, students and professionals. Providing convenient and reliable access to the content they need, whenever and wherever they need it has never been easier! Americas John Wiley & Sons, Inc. USA T: +1 800 835 6770 (toll-free) T: +1 781 388 8598 (outside USA) E: libraryinfo@wiley.com Europe, Middle East, Africa Wiley Europe Ltd. United Kingdom T: +44 (0) 208 3263800 F: +44 (0) 208 3263801 E: libraryinfo@wiley.com Asia Pacifi c John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte. Ltd. Singapore T: +65 6463 2400 F: +65 6463 4912 E: libraryinfoasia@wiley.com The Benefi ts... Ω Unlimited concurrent access for multiple users Ω Browse and search by ISBN, title and key word Ω Navigate by subject, person, period, place or key topic Ω Highly structured, full-text articles presented in HTML and PDF Ω Detailed descriptive abstracts and verifi ed bibliographies Ω CrossRef enables direct linking from references to full articles Ω Flexible access 24/7 from your library, home, or on the road! In addition, you’ll also benefi t from a range of useful tools and resources in our librarian support program: Ω Global Customer Service Ω Customer Administration Page Ω Online Tutorials Ω WebEx Training Ω Librarian e-Newsletter, and more! Sign up now at: www.interscience.wiley.com/library-alerts Patai’s Chemistry of Functional Groups Zvi Rappoport, Joel Liebman, Ilan Marek The most complete work on the chemistry of functional groups is now available online! The electronic major reference work, e-Patai, contains all volumes published from 1996 onwards. Pre- 1996 titles are available as part of the online book series. e-Patai ISBN: 978-0-470-68253-1 Online Book Series ISSN: 2042-5651 Pharmaceutical Sciences Encyclopedia Drug Discovery, Development and Manufacturing Shayne Cox Gad Over 13,000 pages of content from acclaimed pharma ceutical sciences titles integrated into a single online source. Cross-references in each article enable you to instantly link to related articles and references at the end of each article enable you to hyperlink to the primary literature. ISBN: 978-0-470-57122-4 Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis David Crich, André B. Charette, Philip L. Fuchs, Gary Molander Designed and developed for chemists, EROS offers systematic and exhaustive coverage of reagents used in organic synthesis. This evolving database includes CrossRef, InChlTM, and InChlKeys – essential tools for seamless searching and cross-referencing. ISBN: 978-0-470-84289-8 Organic Reactions Prof. Scott E. Denmark, Editor-in-Chief Devoted to important synthetic reactions, the chemistry is presented for a preparative point of view and particular attention is given to reaction limitations, interfering infl uences, effects of chemical structure, and the selection of experimental conditions. Tables detailing all possible examples of the reaction under consideration are included. Database: 978-0-471-26418-7 Online Book Series ISSN: 0078-6179 Get in touch! For quick answers to any of your questions, to discuss licensing options or to set up a free trial, contact your local book sales agent, our Customer Service Team, or your Wiley-Blackwell Account Manager: www.interscience.wiley.com/support www.interscience.wiley.com june10b.indd 311 5/27/2010 9:15:01 AM C&RL News June 2010 312 Despite these difficulties, we have ample data to show the seasonality of use for many of our resources and to demonstrate how widely this varies from one resource to the next. In order to analyze these data in a manageable manner, the following rules of thumb were adopted: • The analysis was restricted to FY 06, 07, and 08. • For each year, the peak month of total activity (always March or April) was identified and compared to activ- ity in July, which was invariably the slowest month—note that peaks and valleys were defined for the sum of all activ- ity, and so would not always match the peak or trough month for a specific resource. • The analysis was restricted to resources that had been main- tained throughout the three-year period and had no missing data for the relevant months: about a third of the resources were not susceptible to the analysis because of this. The data show strong seasonality for the overall use of our online resources, with use in the peak month being about 215 percent of July use for each of the years in ques- tion (the summer-to-spring differences are dramatic throughout all years of our data, not simply the three fiscal years involved in the analysis). A number of our resources are above this ratio some years and below in other years. But there are some resources whose use is always dramatically more sea- sonal and other resources whose use hardly varies from month-to-month. In order to illustrate these differences, I have selected only the most extreme examples. Table 1 illustrates the databases whose use is so seasonal that use in the peak month ex- ceeded July use by a factor of at least 3:1 in each of the sampled years. More than half the databases with highly seasonal use provide full-text, allowing for “one stop shopping” on a topic of interest. Several others are hybrids, not completely full-text but with many articles either resident or readily accessible through outbound open URLs. The general picture the data suggest is that students are looking for databases that will answer their needs with a single search. The appearance of JSTOR, which is not nearly com- prehensive in any dis- cipline, but which will reliably bring up high- quality, full-text articles on almost any subject, in the list of highly sea- sonal databases, is hard to understand in any other light. At the other end of the scale, Table 2 shows those databases in which Virginia Tech use in July actually ex- ceeded use in the overall peak month for at least two of the three years in question. It’s notable that the resources whose use endures into the summer include some of our most specialized, and to some degree intimi- dating, resources such as The Journal Citation Reports, Project Euclid journals in mathematics, and digital Sanborn maps. Child Abuse, Child Welfare, and Adoption CIAO (Columbia International Affairs Online) CSIRO journals (Australian science) EthnicNewswatch Expanded Academic Index Family & Society Studies Geobase Health Reference Center Historical Abstracts Hospitality & Tourism JSTOR Literature Resource Center Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe RILM (Music) Women's Studies International Table 1. Databases with high seasonality Table 2. Databases with steady use Early English Books Online ERIC on First Search Journal Citation Reports (ISI) Project Euclid RLG Union Catalog Bibliography Sanborn Maps june10b.indd 312 5/27/2010 9:15:01 AM June 2010 313 C&RL News Other specialized resources that did not quite qualify for appearance in Table 2 but for which use is essentially flat throughout the year include the Web of Science, ISI Proceedings, Inspec, NTIS, and most of the FirstSearch resources that are bibliographic but without full-text. High specialization (Early English Books), the provision of data that will be meaningful only to sophisticates (Journal Citation Reports), and purely bibliographic content about library hold- ings (RLG, OCLC) characterize the few databases for whose use the academic calendar appears to be largely irrelevant. Experienced methodologists will recognize the risk of committing the ecological fallacy in making inferences about the behavior of indi- viduals based on group differences (in this case, the population of active Virginia Tech users in the summer as opposed to that in the spring). However, political scientists, marketers, and oth- ers do routinely draw fairly confident, if hedged, conclusions about individuals from group data, and it would be very difficult to build an argu- ment for the differential patterns we see in the use of these library resources that did not rest on the well-known distinctions in purpose, niche, and intended audience that differentiate many of the online resources that libraries offer. No academic librarian knowledgeable about the of- ferings of his or her own institution would find it difficult to identify local resources that vary widely along these same dimensions. So what? It’s natural to ask whether these data suggest any changes in library practice. One policy implication is that although it makes sense to reduce reference staffing during slow times, there are always people working with our more complex and specialized resources (per- haps even faculty thinking “When the students leave, I can get some real work done on my research?”). Some of our most dedicated us- ers do much of their work when we tend to be lightly staffed, so we should at least make sure that online help is available all the time. Individual libraries may profit from looking at these ratios in their own cases, and perhaps in making comparisons across institutions. If, for example, a library were to find that a resource it acquired to support general un- dergraduate instruction is not seeing highly seasonal use, it may indicate that the resource has not been sufficiently promoted to its in- tended clientele. The extreme degree of these differences is a useful reminder of just how differentiated our user populations are. We offer a wide range of resources to all, but they are used in highly different ways and to highly different degrees. The data underscore the point that each academic library has user populations, not a user population. And it’s not just the parking situation that changes as the year progresses. fiction, edited by Lynn Stegner (New York: Penguin, 2002). 6. E-mail with Cycholl, July 16, 2009. 7. Theodore Roethke to Morton Dauwen Zabel, Poetry: A Magazine of Verse Records, • Philosophy Now–Events. The “Events” section of the Web site for the magazine Phi- losophy Now has an extensive list of upcom- ing conferences, workshops, and seminars arranged by geographic location. The list is quite comprehensive in that regularly oc- Box 40, Folder 15, Special Collections Re- search Center, University of Chicago Library. 8. E-mail with O’Leary, July 10, 2009. 9. E-mail with Scappettone, January 3, 2008. (“Lighting fires . . .” cont. from page 297) (“Speculative Realism” cont. from page 308) curring informal coffee shop meetings are included alongside national academic con- ferences. However, it is not possible to limit the Web site’s search function to only the events section, and occasions are not indexed other than by location. Access: http://www. philosophynow.org/events. june10b.indd 313 5/27/2010 9:15:01 AM