College and Research Libraries in G e r m a n y , " while W i d m a n n tried to an- swer the question, " W h e r e can bibliographi- cal evidence be found concerning G e r m a n publications issued from 1939 to 1950?" ( p . 1 6 ) , which allowed him to include much material published outside of G e r m a n y . In the introductory chapter, on the scope of his "Uberblick," the author discusses and illustrates the difficulties of his u n d e r t a k i n g — questionnaires and personal visits played an important role, publishers rather than li- braries often had the answers—and again a f t e r the 216 pages of bibliographical listing proper, in a "Riickblick und U m b l i c k , " he analyzes once more the plight of the scholar and scientist resulting from the political and social disruption of the period. V i e w s and data as published by the author elsewhere (e.g. in Libri, 1950) as w e l l as by other authorities, notably G e o r g Leyh ( B e r i c h t : 1947, supplemented in the Deutschland- Jahrbuch, 1949), G u s t a v H o f m a n n and Heinrich Middendorf (in v. 34, 1950, of the Jahrbuch der Deutschen Bibliotheken) and by the dean of G e r m a n bibliographers, Joris Vorstius, in his forementioned Ergebnisse, are further elaborated and extended. W i d m a n n then summarizes the state of G e r m a n bibliography and succeeds in show- ing, how on this background of necessity, G e r m a n librarians and bibliographers have tried and are trying valiantly to do their part in building anew their shattered world. T h e necessary threads are established for the r e a d e r : the present degree of coverage of an area is shown, gaps are indicated, prospects of future publication discussed, whether it be in the complicated f r a m e w o r k of the Deut- sche Allgemeine Bibliographie (p.16-22), especially a f t e r 1940, the date of the last Fiinfjahreskatalog, or in any of the subject fields, such as Germanistics (p.79-86). A special chapter is devoted to an extensive review of foreign effort and success in cover- ing G e r m a n publications of the period under consideration. In some areas the G e r m a n s have not succeeded as yet in reestablishing systematic bibliography (e.g. Oriental Studies, p.88-93, an