College and Research Libraries a u t h o r i n d e x . T h e i n d e x provided in the book does not include a u t h o r entries for the references. T h e c o m p i l a t i o n of one list would have revealed that R e i c h m a n n , Blas- ingame, a n d J a h o d a used the second edition o f R o b e r t S. Casey's Punched Cards, Their Applications to Science and Industry, and that T h o m p s o n a n d Hickey used the first edi- tion. T h e c o m p i l a t i o n would have revealed interesting failures to cite f u n d a m e n t a l chap- ters in Casey's book, such as that R e i c h - m a n n does n o t refer to M a d e l i n e Berry's c h a p t e r ten, " A p p l i c a t i o n of P u n c h e d Cards to L i b r a r y R o u t i n e s " although T h o m p s o n does; T h o m p s o n missed W i l d h a c k and Stern's c h a p t e r six on the Peek-a-Boo Sys- tem because he c o m p l e t e d his part before the second edition was published; n e i t h e r R e i c h - m a n n , T h o m p s o n , nor B l a s i n g a m e cites R e e ' s extensive c h a p t e r three on commercial equip- m e n t and supplies; and Miss Hickey's part would be improved had she seen my c h a p t e r n i n e t e e n on " H o l e s , Punches, Notches, Slots and L o g i c . " T h e book presents many examples o f de- ficiencies. B l a s i n g a m e (p. 113) quotes one advantage of machine-sorted cards as " R a p i d sorting, even when there are very large num- bers of cards." T h e o r i g i n a l article refers to o n e m a c h i n e only, the collator, for sorting on 16 characters, and states that it will re- q u i r e 4 hours 16 m i n u t e s to search 100,000 cards, using b o t h feeds together. L i b r a r i a n s will not be impressed by such speed! T h i s q u o t a t i o n a n d related discussion are given u n d e r the general account of punched cards in l i t e r a t u r e searching; they b e l o n g u n d e r the " S i n g l e C a r d — M u l t i Field M e t h o d " on pages 117-18. T h o m p s o n writes (p. 68) of " t h e rhom- boid design of the squares" of D e l t a feature cards; this is geometrically impossible. I have checked these examples. R e i c h m a n n says (p. 33): " I n the vast b i b l i o g r a p h i c a l organization o f the L i b r a r y o f Congress almost all known m e t h o d s of i n f o r m a t i o n retrieval are em- ployed ( n o n - m e c h a n i c a l , semi-automatic and fully mechanized); the activities o f these in- stallations are c o o r d i n a t e d by a C o m m i t t e e on Mechanized I n f o r m a t i o n R e t r i e v a l . " N e i t h e r part o f this sentence is true; there are no fully mechanized i n f o r m a t i o n retrieval systems anywhere. J a h o d a quotes Shaw in 1956 (p. 193-94) to the effect that a c o m p l e t e Mini- card installation should cost a b o u t $ 3 5 0 , 0 0 0 for o n e unit o r $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 each if 100 sets were produced. T h e r e are several o p e r a t i o n a l M i n i c a r d systems now, b u t the cost o f o n e more is more nearly $2 m i l l i o n than the fig- ures predicted. Hickey shows pictures of ma- chine-sorted p u n c h e d cards on pages 324-26 as " a c t u a l size," b u t they are reduced about 26 per c e n t . T h e C O M A C a n d the I B M 9 9 0 0 Special I n d e x Analyzer are paper-tape machines with m e c h a n i c a l sensing, not photoelectric, as stated by J a h o d a (p. 167-71). Zatocards have plain n o t c h i n g positions, not h o l e s — R e i c h - m a n n (p. 18). T h o m p s o n describes the Al- p h a - M a t r e x m a c h i n e (p. 77-78) and quotes claims for it, without adding that only one e x p e r i m e n t a l model was constructed and that is now g a t h e r i n g dust because of cumber- some i n p u t and o u t p u t features a n d an un- a c c e p t a b l e n u m b e r of false drops on re- trieval, perhaps because of poor i n d e x i n g . — C. D. Gull, General Electric Company. German Research Libraries Handbuch der Bibliotheksivissenschaft. 2d ed. V o l u m e I I . E d i t e d by G e o r g Leyh. W i e s b a d e n : Harrassowitz, 1961. 1025p. T h e second volume of the second edition of the Handbuch der Bibliotheksivissenschaft is the most comprehensive work on the ad- m i n i s t r a t i o n o f research libraries in any lan- guage. I t is especially v a l u a b l e to us for the con- trasts it suggests between E u r o p e a n and American research library a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . T h e traditional doubts that American li- brarians have for libraries which 1) shelve books by size a n d numerus currens and 2) offer delivery only in f o u r to twenty-four hours need f u r t h e r analysis. As for the " d o g m a of classified a r r a n g e m e n t " to which we are so devoted, it may o n l y be observed that no m a j o r research library will be able M A Y 1 9 6 2 271 to secure building funds to house t r a d i t i o n a l codex books in this m a n n e r in the q u a n t i t i e s in which they should be c o m i n g i n to sup- port research adequately. Moreover, the scholar who is properly t r a i n e d bibliograph- ically is likely to p r e f e r a well-planned classed catalog to classified a r r a n g e m e n t . As for q u i c k delivery o f books, we all fincl this policy c o n v e n i e n t , b u t the scholar who or- ganizes his b i b l i o g r a p h y b e f o r e h e starts work, a n d plans his procedure carefully, will find twenty-four h o u r or even forty-eight to seventy-two h o u r delivery (say, from M I L C o r some o t h e r e x t e r n a l depository) a m a t t e r of slight c o n s e q u e n c e . P e r h a p s o u r greatest benefits from the organizational i n t e g r a t i o n of p o p u l a r a n d research libraries in t h e U n i t e d States have n o t b e e n the traditions o f o p e n shelves a n d q u i c k delivery b u t t h e traditions of experi- m e n t a t i o n and the honest willingness to face the seemingly u n b o o k i s h m o n s t e r o f mechan- ization. G e r m a n l i b r a r i a n s are far from hos- tile to m e c h a n i z a t i o n , b u t the i n a d e q u a t e budgets a n d the absence of well-heeled f o u n d a t i o n s a n d dollar-happy g o v e r n m e n t agencies are reflected in m a n y parts o f t h e Handbuch. O n the o t h e r hand, the superior q u a l i t y of the top level o f the staffs, dupli- cated in only a half-dozen o r so o f o u r great- est libraries, compensates in a certain meas- ure f o r i n a d e q u a t e m e c h a n i z a t i o n . L e y h has dealt elsewhere a n d in extenso with t h e m a t t e r o f l i b r a r i a n s h i p as a pro- fession, a n d his i n t r o d u c t o r y essay is a codi- fication o f his thought on the s u b j e c t . B u t - tressed heavily with historical data a n d i n f o r m a t i o n on library education in the Ger- man ies, Leyh's study is characterized by a strong emphasis on the scholarly aspects of o u r business, by the need f o r c o m m o n sense, and by the urgency o f self-expression. His ideas are free from cant, and Leyh's own avoidance o f b l i n d c o n v e n t i o n in all aspects of library work has been a formative influ- e n c e in G e r m a n l i b r a r i a n s h i p for more than half a century. Fritz R e d e n b a c h e r has written a m a n u a l of acquisitions practices which with slight modifications to satisfy local conditions, could b e used as a m a n u a l in any library. R e d e n b a c h e r identifies the tools o f the ac- quisitions l i b r a r i a n , defines his methods, and draws b r o a d outlines for policy-making. At times his ideas are clearly governed by the starvation-level b o o k funds of nearly all Eu- r o p e a n university libraries. His book selec- tion procedures are technically correct, b u t we need a s h a r p e r definition o f the methods of mass acquisitions a n d the various forms of access to the world's scholarly l i t e r a t u r e a n d source materials in p r i n t e d form. T h e a d m i r a b l e work o f the Deutsche Forschungs- gemeinschaft in dividing fields o f emphasis a m o n g the W e s t G e r m a n research libraries is described in detail; b u t n e i t h e r this agency n o r o u r F a r m i n g t o n P l a n has b e e n fully sat- isfactory for covering the c u r r e n t world out- put of p r i n t e d m a t e r i a l fully. F o r all his technical correctness, R e d e n - b a c h e r has not faced squarely the p r o b l e m of mass acquisitions. N e i t h e r has H e i n r i c h R o l o f f , whose study o f cataloging is just as correct, technically, as R e d e n b a c h e r ' s . Nei- ther essay takes full cognizance of 1) the pub- l i c a t i o n explosion o f the l a t e r twentieth cen- tury, 2) the need o f research libraries to have some level o f access to all of this material, and 3) the practical necessity o f using ma- chines to h a n d l e it. Y e t R o l o f f has much insight i n t o the es- sential problems o f cataloging scholarly col- lections. L i k e all Handbuch articles, his study provides a resume of scholarship on the sub- ject, fully d o c u m e n t e d ; and it will, o r should be, a p o i n t o f d e p a r t u r e f o r cataloging the- orists. T h e f u n d a m e n t a l problems o f entry, classification, a n d s u b j e c t i n d e x i n g will face the mechanizers o f the n e x t decade just as sternly as they faced H e y n e , J e f f e r s o n , or Panizzi. T h e essay on p u b l i c service by the late Gustav A b b , revised by W i l h e l m M a r t i n L u t h e r , describes the various levels o f serv- ice. T h e variety of the demands o f the groups to whom we owe service, a n d o f o u r collections r e q u i r e s a more sophisticated ap- proach than the na'ive concept o f g e t t i n g the right b o o k to the right person at the right time. O v e r three centuries of solid tradition u n d e r g i r d the studies o f A b b and L u t h e r , and they give us a much-needed per- spective. O n the o t h e r hand, L u t h e r , who has seen the scrumptious a p p o i n t m e n t s o f some post-1945 A m e r i c a n libraries, is keenly aware of the need for physical facilities conducive to constructive reading, w h e t h e r for research, study, o r r e c r e a t i o n . F . A. Schmidt-Kiinsemuller's essay on li- brary b i n d i n g reflects the similarity o f li- brary b i n d i n g problems in E u r o p e and 2 7 2 C O L L E G E A N D R E S E A R C H L I B R A R I E S A m e r i c a . His common-sense definitions o f the b i n d i n g responsibilities of a research li- brary will be useful on b o t h sides of the A t l a n t i c . T h e t r e a t m e n t of special libraries by Nor- bert Fischer is perhaps more v a l u a b l e for the description o f special library organiza- tions and individual libraries, especially in E u r o p e , than for an exposition o f adminis- trative principles. W h i l e certain b r o a d prin- ciples can apply to g e n e r a l research libraries in all countries, the details of o p e r a t i o n o f a medical library, for e x a m p l e , are somewhat different from those o f an art library. F o r this reason Alfons O t t ' s essay on the music li- brary will be more useful to music l i b r a r i a n s than Fischer's will be to o t h e r special li- brarians. Leyh's essay on shelving a n d call n u m b e r s reflects his broad knowledge of practices in o t h e r countries, a n d his decades o f successful a d m i n i s t r a t i o n of a m a j o r research library c o m m a n d serious a t t e n t i o n to his words. T h o s e o f us who see forty thousand to o n e h u n d r e d thousand volumes a year p o u r i n g i n t o o u r stacks may live to regret the day that we d i d n ' t heed Leyh's warnings a b o u t classified a r r a n g e m e n t for the b u l k o f o u r holdings. Leyh's study of library statistical records involves definition a n d e x p o s i t i o n r a t h e r than analysis. T h e vagaries of library records are so confusing that the simple and practical a p p r o a c h is difficult even w i t h i n homoge- neous groups. Leyh urges consideration of large bodies of statistical data r a t h e r than isolated facts, separation of the f u n d a m e n t a l from the secondary, thoughtfulness in mak- ing comparisons. H e i n r i c h T r e p l i n a n d H i l d e b e r t K i r c h n e r study laws governing library use, acquisition a n d disposal o f u n n e e d e d books, copyright law (including policies on p h o t o g r a p h i c copying), a n d i n t e r n a t i o n a l law (especially in c o n n e c t i o n with destruction a n d " l i b e r a - t i o n " by military action). L i b r a r y legislation in the U n i t e d States is generally studied in a m u c h n a r r o w e r sense (mainly covering laws on p u b l i c m u n i c i p a l a n d state-wide library service), a n d the b r e a d t h o f the T r e p l i n - K i r c h n e r approach deserves serious consid- e r a t i o n by authors of o u r manuals on re- search library a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . T h e late H u g o Andres Kriiss' c o n t r i b u t i o n on i n t e r n a t i o n a l aspects o f library work was copied verbatim from the first edition of the Handbuch ( I I [1933], 717-752), a n d Brey- cha-Vauthier covers the last three decades, i n c l u d i n g the d e v e l o p m e n t o f the interna- tional F e d e r a t i o n of L i b r a r y Associations, U N E S C O , i n t e r n a t i o n a l aspects o f documen- tation a n d standards, a n d i n t e r n a t i o n a l li- braries (mainly of the U N ) . T h e c o n c l u d i n g c h a p t e r on library archi- tecture by L e y h a n d G e r h a r d L i e b e r s is o n e of the most v a l u a b l e in the e n t i r e work. As customary for all Handbuch essays, there is a significant a n d instructive historical intro- duction. Liebers, who has travelled in the U n i t e d States, gives a perceptive a n d critical analysis of t h e n u m e r o u s new buildings here in the last decade a n d a half, a n d he is a b l e to e x t r a c t some basic principles from o u r b r o a d e x p e r i e n c e , extensive theorizing, a n d exchanges of ideas. A t the same time he does n o t overlook new library b u i l d i n g s in o t h e r parts o f the world, a n d he is able to r o u n d out the historical a n d theoretical ma- terial in Leyh's section to form a b r o a d and c o h e r e n t s t u d y . — L a w r e n c e S. Thompson, University of Kentucky Libraries. Standards at Work The Sioux Falls College Library: A Survey. B y M a r k M . Gormley a n d R a l p h H . H o p p . Chicago: A L A , 1961. iii, 34p. $2.50. T h o s e f a m i l i a r with library surveys might consider this slim volume, at first glance, scarcely o f passing interest. S i o u x Falls Col- l e g e — c o e d u c a t i o n a l , l i b e r a l arts, d e n o m i n a - tional, e n r o l l m e n t 4 9 6 — i s typical o f hun- dreds of its genre. Its library is hardly u n i q u e (discouragingly), reflecting years o f semistar- v a t i o n : collections l a m e n t a b l y small, staff skeletal, b u i l d i n g i n c a p a b l e o f accommodat- ing foreseeable e n r o l l m e n t increases. T h i s r e p o r t is in turn typical (in the best sense) of what a college a d m i n i s t r a t i o n may e x p e c t u p o n r e q u e s t i n g a library survey un- der A L A auspices: a visit by a team o f able a n d e x p e r i e n c e d l i b r a r i a n s — h e r e , the execu- tive secretary o f A C R L , and the associate M A Y 1 9 6 2 2 7 3