College and Research Libraries Book Reviews The Library-College: Contributions for American Higher Education at the Jamestown College Workshop, 1965. Ed. by Louis Shores, Robert Jordan, John Harvey. Philadelphia: Drexel Press, 1966. 2 8 7 p . For several years before the Jamestown College Workshop was convened in De- cember 1965, the participants had circu- lated papers and corresponded on the li- brary-college idea. They were already advo- cates of the idea when President Sillers in- vited them to think with him and members of the Jamestown faculty about the estab- lishment of a library-college for the liberal arts on that campus. Their papers, the Library-College Newsletters, and the James- town Workshop Committee Reports—Char- ter, Curriculum, Personnel, Supporting Me- dia and Architecture—are gathered in this volume. "A Genealogy of the Library-Col- lege Idea" and a chronologically arranged "Library College Bibliography" compiled by Robert Jordan round out a collection which should be of vital interest to any librarian who is concerned as an educator. The earliest paper was written in 1934 by Louis Shores and is entitled "The Library Arts College, a Possibility in 1954." He says that his "undergraduate experiences like those of many other students, convinced him he could learn much more in the li- brary reading than he could by attending most classes." Looking ahead he saw the library arts college as "merely the logical culmination of such current trends in Ameri- can education as are exemplified by honors courses, comprehensive examinations and other reforms of the last decade." And indeed, under B. Lamar Johnson as dean and librarian, Stephens College be- came a "library arts" college as early as 1938. Books were made a constant part of the student's environment, and teachers and librarians merged into a single instructional staff. "Vitalizing a College Library" and the Summary are his valuable contributions to the book. In the decade after World War II the trend described by Louis Shores and ex- emplified by Stephens College did not con- tinue. Rather, older institutions expanded in a pattern of classroom and lecture hall for larger and larger groups of students. New small colleges like the experimental ones begun in the 1930's were not de- veloped. New ground was broken by Patricia Knapp in 1956 in her paper "A Suggested Program of College Instruction in the Use of the Library" (see "The Monteith College Library Experiment," CRL, XXVII [Novem- ber 1967]). According to her, library use is one of the liberal arts and the library is the college. She states this in "The Library Organization of Resources As the Curricu- lum: a Minority Report," where she writes, "Educators maintain the curriculum should be based on the structure of the discipline. The organization of the library reflects that structure. Where better than in the Library- College can we try out the notion that there might be some merit in relating the two?" In the 1960's Robert Jordan has gathered together many librarians who feel that there is a teaching function to librarianship. He asserts that librarians have an "unique mis- sion as the guardians of general education," and calls for more courage and self-confi- dence ("The Library-College—a Proposal, 1962"). If there was a neglected topic of discus- sion at Jamestown, it was, perhaps, the "Training and Orientation" of librarians. John Harvey's paper suggests that superior colleges, presumably ones where independ- ent study takes place, are the best place to recruit a library-college faculty; Dan Sillers' report on personnel calls for a faculty of bibliographical experts. For our own train- ing and orientation we librarians need a library-college.—Charlotte Fletcher, St. John's College. A Critical Survey of University Libraries and Librarianship in Great Britain. By Harrison Bryan. Adelaide: Libraries Board of S. Australia, 1966. iii, 255p. $2. Although it bears a 1966 imprint date, this Critical Survey was presented for the Diploma of the Library Association of Aus- / 157