College and Research Libraries 156 I College & Research Libraries • March 1981 McClure, Charles R. Information for Academic Library Decision-Making: The Case for Organizational Information Management. Contributions in Librarian- ship and Information Science, no.31. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1980. 227p. $23.95. LC 79-8412. ISBN 0-313- 21398-4. Decision making, for some time the dar- ling of management theorists, has finally made its formal debut into librarianship. Given the increasing complexity of academic libraries both in their organiza- tional development and in their utilization of technology, it is no wonder that investi- gators should now begin to examine the process by which library management deci- sions are made. This is a useful and impor- tant research study, derived from the au- thor's 1977 doctoral dissertation. Several underlying assumptions of the study bear emphasis. "(1) The most impor- tant resource of the organization is the indi- vidual, and (2) every employee is a deci- sion-maker" (p . 186). McClure examines the patterns of factual information exchange among library staff members. He demon- strates that various staff groups access and utilize different types of information in a situation-specific manner. His concern, which is every administrator's concern , is that "if an organization employs twenty in- dividuals who are contributing to the ac- complishment of goals at only 75 percent of their potential, there is a loss of five posi- tions in the organization" (p.171). He effec- tively argues that if more staff members have a wider and better selection of infor- mation on which to base their contribution to the total decision-making process , better and more responsive library services will be developed . This is not a new discovery , but what is significant in this book is that now there are empirical data to describe just how information is utilized in a number of libraries. Beyond that-without rehashing the old shibboleths about participative man- agement-McClure provides practical guid- ance on how the opportunities for participa- tion can be extended to more staff on the basis of enhanced " organizational informa- tion management." The study draws on many of the most im- portant user studies of management and technical information that have been pro- duced over the last fifteen years. It also in- corporates some useful concepts from, and references to, . recent research on com- munication in organizations. McClure points up one important and possibly surprising fact that may reflect more on the libraries in his sample popula- tion than on general practice in the field. He states with regard to management informa- tion that "of primary importance is the con- sideration that for many libraries there sim- ply are no internal or statistical reports" (p.165) . I can see how this may be the case in some academic libraries, but in most that I have known either as employee or consul- tant there has been an overwhelming flood of internal reports. Perhaps the point is really that there are few up-to-date, prob- lem-oriented reports effectively employing empirical data to support management rec- ommendations . This is certainly the case, although ARL 's SPEC Kits (Systems and Procedures Exchange ) have helped to address this problem somewhat through the sharing of certain reports of general applica- bility. Computer-based management infor- mation systems (MIS ) are also needed to provide detailed library statistical data on demand. The final point is not a criticism of the study , which is outstanding within the scope of its coverage. The research , howev- er, deals primarily with the factual compo- nents of information necessary for man- agemental decision making. It is doubtless understood, though not explicitly acknowl- edged , that there are other information components of decision making that may in some cases be as important as or more im- portant than concrete facts , i.e., the values, experience, and purposes of the contribu- tors, as well as the historical and political characteristics of the setting.-Robert S. Runyon , University of Nebraska at Omaha . "Special Issue on AACR2." James Thomp- son , ed. Alternative Catalog Newsletter, no.21 (June 1980). $5 (prepaid). ISSN 0161-7192. (Available from: Milton S . Eisenhower Library, Johns Hopkins Uni- versity, Baltimore, MD 21218.) In February 1980, editors of the Alterna- tive Catalog Newsletter-convinced that