ren.p65 Integrating Library Research and Service 165 Integrating Library Research and Service: The Case of Internet Training for Small Business Executives Wen-Hua Ren and Ka-Neng Au Library research and service have the potential to be complementary. This paper reports on how the desire to better serve small business users for their government information needs led to a research survey of small business executives in New Jersey and how the research find­ ings provided further motivation, guidance, and input to a successful Internet training program. The authors’ experiences show that academic librarians could improve effectiveness in both library research and ser­ vice if they seek to integrate these two aspects of their career. n academic libraries, most ten­ ure-track librarians have to balance their work in, or con­ tributions to, librarianship, scholarship, and professional service in order to survive or thrive in the tenure system. Of the three components, schol­ arship, which generally involves research and publication, is frequently viewed as the most challenging for librarians. Pre­ vious research has shown that “the most frequent cause for librarians being denied tenure is an inadequate research and pub­ lication record.”1 A rigid work schedule, insufficient research training, and the lack of research support and funding have been among the most frequently cited rea­ sons.2 A review of the literature revealed two contrasting views among academic librar­ ians regarding the relationship between a librarian’s research and his or her library service. One is the separative view, which “separates professional practice from scholarship and service, and splinters what is designed to be a cohesive and complementary process.”3 The librarians who hold this view regard scholarship as an additional burden, claiming that “a requirement or an expectation to perform research and to publish it could result in a serious reduction in the level of service provided to the library’s users.”4 This view of library research conflicting with library service was said to have contrib­ uted to the resentment toward, and diffi­ culty in, library research and publication.5 An integrative view of research and library service has been presented to aca­ demic librarians as a positive alternative. This view projects benefits that research can bring to library service. For example, research is said to “facilitate concrete un­ derstanding of the access and service Wen-Hua Ren is a Documents/Business Librarian in the John Cotton Dana Library at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey; e-mail: whren@newark.rutgers.edu. Ka-Neng Au is a Business Librarian, also in the John Cotton Dana Library at Rutgers; e-mail: au@newark.rutgers.edu. The authors wish to extend their gratitude to the Center for Entrepreneurial Management at Rutgers University, the New Jersey Small Business Development Center, and the Rutgers University Libraries for their support. 165 mailto:au@newark.rutgers.edu mailto:whren@newark.rutgers.edu 166 College & Research Libraries March 2001 needs of the library clientele,”6 and “helps librarians understand what they must do to best serve their users” due to the in­ creasing rate of change in information technology.7 Furthermore, to be inte­ grated into the librarian’s work of service, research should be meaningful to the li­ brarian in that it reflects and enhances his or her experience, education, and profes­ sional expertise. “Ideas for scholarly projects should come, at least to some extent, from the daily work of the librar­ ian who is involved in planning and de­ veloping services and programs and in making decisions related to them.”8 In this paper, the authors report their efforts to create a synergy between research and service. In view of the requirements of the ten­ ure system and the rapid change of in­ formation technology in the service en­ vironment of the academic librarian, the authors hold that the question is not whether academic librarians should in­ tegrate research and library service but, rather, how. Integration is critical not only for academic librarians to obtain career security and advancement, but also for the creation of knowledge and the im­ provement of quality for library service. In this paper, the authors report their ef­ forts to create a synergy between research and service. Specifically, they describe how a research project on government information searching grew from service to the small business users and how re­ search findings led to the successful cre­ ation and implementation of a training program for the small business commu­ nity. Identifying the Government Information Needs of Small Businesses The increased use of the Internet by the government for publishing and dissemi­ nating government information presents challenges as well as opportunities for small businesses. To run their businesses successfully, small business people need timely, accurate, and authoritative infor­ mation, much of which is collected and published only by the federal govern­ ment. Prior to the Internet, government publications had been published prima­ rily in the print format and were avail­ able only in depository libraries. Whereas large companies had their information needs taken care of by in-house informa­ tion specialists, small business users usu­ ally had to conduct information searches themselves with or without the assistance of government agencies and the deposi­ tory libraries. The Internet now provides access to government-published informa­ tion, and small business users can obtain this information anywhere and at any time. However, the benefits of the Internet to the small business community depend on answers to many questions. For ex­ ample, do the small business owners have computer and Internet access? Assuming they have access, what, if any, type of government information do they need? Are they aware that much government information is available on the Internet and free for access? Do they have the nec­ essary skills to search for information on the Internet? Do they need some form of Internet training? Answers to these questions are essen­ tial for providing high-quality service to the small business community, which is regarded as an important sector of the cli­ entele of Rutgers University’s John Cot­ ton Dana Library. The Dana Library, which serves the Rutgers-Newark cam­ pus, has been a federal depository library since 1966. Government publications, es­ pecially in business and economics, are among the resources that librarians use most frequently in their daily reference services. With its large business collection and its librarian expertise in business and management information and govern­ ment documents, the library has become an integral part of the entrepreneurship and small business development commu­ nity in Newark. The campus is home to the state headquarters of the New Jersey Small Business Development Center Integrating Library Research and Service 167 (SBDC) as well as the Center for Entre­ preneurial Management, a research cen­ ter administered by the Rutgers Faculty of Management, which has been expand­ ing its entrepreneurship studies. Due to all the aforementioned reasons, the library attracts many users from the surround­ ing community, including small business users. In response to the growing govern­ ment information needs by small busi­ nesses, a study was designed to survey small business executives in the state of New Jersey in summer 1997. Eighty-one executives participated. Major questions were asked about the need for and use of government information and the aware­ ness of its availability on the Internet. Also included in the survey was a free train­ ing program about government informa­ tion on the Internet to be offered to inter­ ested participants of the study. The survey revealed that 87.2 percent of the respondents owned a computer and 73.1 percent had Internet access. Although 65.4 percent of the respondents rated gov­ ernment information important or some­ what important to their business opera­ tions, as many as 55.1 percent of the par­ ticipants were unaware that government information is available on the Internet; even fewer (27.2%) could list any govern­ ment Internet sites they had visited. Most of the small business executives relied on secondary sources to obtain government information. Over 82 percent did not or infrequently consulted public consultants (depository librarians, SBDC consultants, and government officials) for government information retrieval and use. Many ex­ ecutives (61.2%) had little confidence in their ability to search for electronic gov­ ernment information. Only 8.6 percent had some kind of training in government information searching, and 64.2 percent expressed a strong interest in learning how to search the Internet for government information. These research findings provided very important input and impetus to the set­ ting up of the Internet training program for the interested small business execu­ tives. First, as government documents and business librarians, the authors’ mo­ tivation was boosted by the findings that government information was important and the small business users needed Internet training. Second, the research findings earned the credibility to lobby for moral, administrative, and financial support. Finally, and most important, the data helped the authors design and con­ duct the training program, including de­ termining the scope of the training, sched­ uling the program, and selecting training sources. Designing and Conducting the Internet Training Ittaining Prograg Support Research played a key role in obtaining the support and commitment from the various stakeholders. The application for funding was made on the basis of the re­ search findings, and the fact that the re­ search had been published further en­ hanced the authors’ credibility.9 The training project gained strong support from the Center for Entrepreneurial Man­ agement at Rutgers, which funded the training program, and the SBDC, which sponsored the program and administered its publicity mailing and registration. The library administration allocated time for program design and training and pro­ vided electronic classrooms and other fa­ cilities.10 Prograg Goals Based on the findings of the 1997 survey, the authors set up the following goals for the training program: (1) to increase awareness that the U.S. government pub­ lishes valuable information on the Internet by introducing the attendees to a variety of Internet government informa­ tion sources; (2) to encourage and enable small business users to use government- published information on the Internet by teaching them basic search skills and fa­ miliarizing them with various formats of the Internet government publications; (3) to increase their awareness of the types of assistance available to small business http:cilities.10 168 College & Research Libraries March 2001 users (i.e., depository libraries in the com­ munity and librarians’ expertise) so as to increase government information use and enhance the academic libraries’ relation­ ship with the small business community. All sessions were conducted in a library electronic classroom, where the instructor was able to post the live Internet demonstration onto individual computer screens and trainees were able to have hands-on practice during the training. Training Schedule, Locations, and Facilities The survey responses showed that the most-preferred training time was a week­ day morning. Accordingly, the training program was scheduled on Friday morn­ ings. The program was repeated on three Rutgers campuses for the convenience of the participants: the Newark campus in the northern part of New Jersey, the New Brunswick campus in the central part of the state, and the Camden campus in the southern part of New Jersey. All sessions were conducted in a library electronic classroom, where the instructor was able to post the live Internet demonstration onto individual computer screens and trainees were able to have hands-on prac­ tice during the training. Training Topics As shown in the 1997 survey, government regulatory and legislative types of infor­ mation were of greatest importance to small business operations; and business/ market-related statistical information (market research, economic statistics, and demographic data) was the second most important. These findings were taken into account in designing the three-hour train­ ing program. The training topics were broken into two sections: “What is my market?” and “What is my environ­ ment?” The former covered areas of in­ dustry information, demographics and consumers, and economic and financial statistics; the latter included current regu­ lations, pending and current legislation, and sources of assistance. Conducting the Training Attendees. Thirty-five small business us­ ers attended the training sessions. Based on the information from those who filled out the program evaluation, 60 percent of the trainees were male, 55.2 percent were black, and 46.7 percent were forty- five to fifty-four years old, 60 percent had college degrees or some college educa­ tion, and 33.3 percent had graduate de­ grees or some graduate education. About 59 percent of the trainees were owners, 7.4 percent were managers, and 22.2 per­ cent were employees. Some small busi­ ness owners were unable to attend but asked to be notified of future programs. Approximately 56 percent were from the service sector and about 40 percent had had their business for more than six years. Tables 1 and 2 present individual and business information on the attend­ ees. TABLE 1 Individual Background Information Age % Gender % Education % Ethnic Status % (n = 30) (n = 30) (n = 30) (n = 29) 15-24 6.7 Male 60 High school 6.7 Black 55.2 25-34 6.6 Female 40 Some college 40.0 White 27.6 35-44 30.0 College degree 20.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 6.9 45-54 46.7 Some grad. school 13.3 Hispanic 3.4 55-64 6.7 Graduate degree 20.0 American Indian 3.4 65-over 3.3 Other 3.4 Integrating Library Research and Service 169 TABLE 2 Business Information Position % Years in Business % Industry % (n = 27) (n = 31) (n = 30) Owner 59.3 Under 1 12.9 Service 56.6 Manager 7.4 1-3 19.4 Construction 16.7 Employee 22.2 4-6 3.2 Retail 10.0 Other 11.1 Above 6 38.7 Wholesale 6.7 Planning phase! Manufacturing 3.3 Not in business 25.8 Other 6.7 Training methods. All the topics and sources used in the training were pre­ sented in the form of a Web page, which served as the instruction outline, the hands-on practice guide, and the posttraining review guide.11 The trainees were shown the three to four most com­ monly used government sources for each topic area. Real business questions were used to introduce the sources as answers in order to stimulate interest in the audi­ ence. For example, under industry infor­ mation in the “What is my market?” sec­ tion, the question, How many bakeries are there in Camden County? was answered by a source link to the County Business Patterns (Census Bureau). After the pre­ sentation of each section, participants had hands-on practice in reviewing the dem­ onstrated sources and exploring related new sites selected for practice. Librarians were available for assistance in the search­ ing and for consultation with real busi­ ness information questions. During the training, the participants also learned about the federal depository libraries, the small business development centers, and other programs where they could receive a variety of assistance. Assessing Training Effectiveness To examine the effectiveness of the train­ ing program, the trainees were asked to fill out two questionnaires, one before the training started and the other immedi­ ately after the training was completed. Pretraining Assessment The pretraining assessment provided data to be compared with data collected in the posttraining assessment. The pretraining assessment contained three categories: knowledge, Internet use, and confidence in Internet searching. Knowledge. On a five-point scale (1 be­ ing very little and 5 being a lot), the trainees were asked to indicate the ex­ tent to which they knew that (1) the gov­ ernment will publish most of its infor­ mation in electronic format, such as on the Web; (2) much government informa­ t i o n c a n a l r e a d y b e f o u n d o n t h e Internet; and (3) special assistance in finding government information is available in federal depository libraries in their community. Internet use frequency. On a five-point scale (1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = couple of times a month, 4 = every week, and 5 = every day), the trainees reported how fre­ quently they searched for information on government and nongovernment Web sites. Confidence. On a five-point scale with 1 being least confident and 5 being most con­ fident, the trainees reported how confident they were in searching for government in­ formation on government Web sites and on nongovernment agency Web sites. Posttraining Assessment The posttraining assessment collected information on the usefulness of the train­ ing topics and the effect of the training on the trainees’ knowledge of govern­ ment information on the Internet and on their confidence in searching the Internet for government information. http:guide.11 170 College & Research Libraries March 2001 Usefulness. Usefulness was measured by asking the trainees to rate on a five- point scale (1 being least useful and 5 be­ ing most useful) the usefulness of seven parts of the program, namely, industry statistics, demographic data, economic conditions, current regulations, pending and recent legislation, sources of assis­ tance, and hands-on practice. Effects related to searching government Web sites. On a five-point scale (1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree), trainees indicated whether the training improved their Internet search­ ing skills, enhanced their confidence in searching government Web sites, and in­ creased their knowledge of government information on the Internet. Other training effects. On a five-point scale (1 being strongly disagree and 5 be­ ing strongly agree), trainees were asked to indicate whether more training pro­ grams on similar topics should be offered to small business users in the future and whether the trainees would search govern­ ment Web sites more often in the future. It is by no means easy to balance research and library service, but there seems to be great potential for academic librarians to integrate the two. Results Analysis of the pretraining assessment showed that 81.8 percent of the trainees had Internet access. Approximately 52 percent were unaware that the govern­ ment will publish most of its information in electronic format; one-third did not know that much of government informa­ tion could be found on the Internet; and 50 percent did not know that special as­ sistance in locating government informa­ tion was available in federal depository libraries in their community. Seventy per­ cent never or rarely searched the Internet for government information. About half of the attendees expressed little confi­ dence in searching government Web sites (53.3%) and nongovernment Web sites (48.4%). Analysis of the posttraining assess­ ment showed that of the subject areas of the program, hands-on practice, sources of assistance, and demographic data were rated the top three most useful areas to their business. Most of the trainees agreed or strongly agreed that the training in­ creased their knowledge of government information on the Internet (87.1%), im­ proved their Internet search skills for gov­ ernment information (83.9%), and en­ hanced their confidence in searching for government information on the Internet (90.3%). The posttraining assessment con­ firmed that the program achieved its pri­ mary goals of encouraging and enabling small business users to use government information on the Internet. It exposed the trainees to a wide range of govern­ ment sources available on the federal gov­ ernment Web sites. The trainees learned some basic Internet search skills, became more familiar with the different formats and structures of government informa­ tion published on the Internet, and be­ came more aware of the federal deposi­ tory libraries in New Jersey, where they could obtain assistance in searching for government information. Most impor­ tant, the training increased their confi­ dence in conducting an Internet search for government information. Ninety percent of the trainees indicated that more train­ ing programs on the topic should be of­ fered to small business people in the fu­ ture, and 87.1 percent said they would search government Web sites more fre­ quently. Discussion and Conclusion In an endeavor to serve the government information needs of small businesses, the authors learned to integrate research and service in a complementary and synergis­ tic way. The research questions regarding small business executives’ awareness and use of government information arose from a commitment to high-quality service to the small business community in an era of information technology. Research find­ ings, in turn, shed light on the problems Integrating Library Research and Service 171 the authors faced and laid the conceptual foundations for designing and implement­ ing the training program. Evaluating the program provided feedback to previous research, stimulated new research ques­ tions, and provided experience that can be applied to future user service programs. Research and service thus created a syner­ gistic cycle in which they stimulated and provided input to each other that resulted in not only research publications, but also needed user services. It is worth pointing out that the au­ thors’ integrative model requires the li­ brarians’ active engagement in the pro­ cess. Librarians have to utilize research findings and service experience to gener­ ate support and resources from relevant parties. For instance, one has to “sell” is­ sues with important practical implica­ tions to research bodies and research find­ ings to service providers for gathering resources and support. The academic and service environ­ ment of an organization is important to the integration of research and service. The aforementioned librarian engage­ ment presupposes the existence of poten­ tial support. In the authors’ case, they re­ ceived guidance and support from pro­ fessors of entre p reneurship at the Rutgers Center for Entrepreneurial Man­ agement, who commented on the survey questionnaires, allowed their students to do pilot testing, and provided financial support.12 On the service side, the au­ thors had support from the New Jersey Small Business Development Center lo­ cated on the campus. Academic librar­ ians should be aware of the potentials and limitations and conscientiously cul­ tivate relationships with potential col­ laborators. This experience taught the authors that research-guided outreach programs are most effective in bringing recognition and opportunities and in connecting the au­ thors with both academic faculty and cli­ ent community. The entrepreneurship program of the Faculty of Management has since invited the authors to partici­ pate in their curriculum development, and the SBDC has expressed interest in cosponsoring future programs with the library. The integrative method that worked effectively in this study might be due to individual and institutional characteristics specific to the authors’ personal experi­ ences. Each academic librarian who desires to balance research and service needs to find his or her own way of integrating the two components. It is by no means easy to balance research and library service, but there seems to be great potential for aca­ demic librarians to integrate the two. To the extent that such integration is success­ ful, it will improve the productivity and quality of both research and service, which will, in turn, contribute to creating knowl­ edge in librarianship, providing high-qual­ ity service to users, enhancing the relation­ ship with the community, and advancing the career of individual librarians. Notes 1. W. Bede Mitchell and L. Stanislava Swieszowski, “Publication Requirements and Tenure Approval Rates: An Issue for Academic Librarians,” College & Research Libraries 46 (May 1985): 249–55. 2. Robert Boice, Jordan M. Scepanski, and Wayne Wilson, “Librarians and Faculty Members: Coping with Pressures to Publish,” College & Research Libraries 48 (Nov. 1987): 494–503; William K. Black and Joan M. Leysen, “Scholarship and the Academic Librarian,” College & Research Li­ braries 55 (May 1994): 229–41; Donald E. Riggs, “Faculty Status for Librarians: Force-Fitting into an Inappropriate Mold or Not?” College & Research Libraries 60 (July 1999): 305–6. 3. Black and Leysen, “Scholarship and the Academic Librarian,” 230. 4. Willis Bridegam, “A Research Requirement for Librarians?” Journal of Academic Librarianship 4 (July 1978): 135–36. 5. Black and Leysen, “Scholarship and the Academic Librarian,” 229–41. 6. Ibid., 230. http:support.12 172 College & Research Libraries March 2001 7. Ann C. Weller, Julie M. Hurd, and Stephen E. Wiberley Jr., “Publication Patterns of U.S. Academic Librarians from 1993 to 1997,” College & Research Libraries 60 (July 1999): 352–62. 8. Black and Leysen, “Scholarship and the Academic Librarian,” 231. 9. Wen-Hua Ren, “U.S. Government Information Need, Awareness, and Searching: A Study of Small Business Executives,” Journal of Government Information 26, no. 5 (Oct. 1999): 453–65; ———. “Self-Efficacy and the Search for Government Information: A Study of Small Business Executives,” Reference & User Services Quarterly 38, no. 3 (spring 1999): 283–91. 10. The authors would like to thank all those who helped in the program. Special acknowl­ edgment is extended to Lynn Mullins, director of the Dana Library, and Theo Haynes, business librarian of Robeson Library, Rutgers-Camden, for their support and assistance. 11. The Web page entitled Uncle Sam to the Rescue! Searching for Government Information on the Web is available online at http://newarkwww.rutgers.edu/guides/unclesam.htm. 12. Gratitude is extended especially to Dr. Patricia Greene, former professor in the Faculty of Management of Rutgers University, for her guidance and assistance. http://newarkwww.rutgers.edu/guides/unclesam.htm