CRC Dictionary of Agricultural Sciences

       	Previous	 	Contents	 	Next
	Issues in Science and Technology  Librarianship
	Summer 2002

	DOI:10.5062/F4HT2M8T



      

     Book Reviews
    CRC Dictionary of Agricultural Sciences
      Helen Smith
  Agricultural Sciences Librarian
  Pennsylvania State University
hfs1@psulias.psu.edu

    


    

Lewis, Robert A. CRC Dictionary of Agricultural Sciences.   Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press, 2002. 674p. ISBN 0-8493-2327-4. $89.95   (Hardcover).

    Agriculture is a broad subject area so anything that helps us in our reference   work is to be commended. The 15,000 terms in this dictionary, according to the   back cover, relate to "all aspects of agriculture, from traditional farming the   latest developments in biotechnology and genetics." The subject coverage does   appear to be slanted towards the environmental sciences. However, no detailed   scope note is included so it is impossible to determine if the book meets its   goals. Also, the criteria for including terms, and the resources consulted, are   not described. The "about the author" section describes the author as experienced   in areas of pollution and the environment, and that may explain the strong   coverage of those subjects. This dictionary is easy to use with the term in   boldface and the subsequent definition indented slightly. There are however, no   illustrations. The terms included consist of full words, phrases, abbreviations,   and variant spellings (with references back to the main entry). Phrases are   often listed under the main term. For example the phrase "occult antigen" is   defined in the paragraph on "antigen" along with many other types of "antigens."   In some cases there is a cross reference leading from the phrase to the   correct term, in some cases there is not. This listing of many phrases under one   term can make some of the entries quite lengthy. Simple terms may also have long   entries due to the many variant meanings that are included. There is a strong   coverage of environmental issues and chemicals, with many of these entries being   much more than a simple definition, actually quite encyclopedic in nature.   Chemical entries usually include uses, toxicity, and history. 

    It is always difficult to evaluate a dictionary. If it contains the one word  someone is looking for, then it is invaluable. This dictionary may be unique in  its combination of agricultural terms with a strong representation of environmental  terms and concepts. Although it claims to include traditional farming terms, it  does not compete in that area with the John Winburne's classic Dictionary of  Agricultural and Allied Terminology (Michigan State University Press 1962).   This dictionary does not make it to my "must have" list, but it can be recommended  for its coverage of more recent concepts in biotechnology and the environment and  would be a useful purchase as an additional resource for an agricultural reference  collection. 

    

  

  	Previous	 	Contents	 	Next