CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY B1168.E5''d51' """"""^ """' 3 1924 029 009 920 Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tlie Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029009920 NOVUM ORGANUM BY LORD BACON EDITED BY JOSEPH DEVEY, M.A. NEW YORK P. F. COLLIER & SON M C M I I 22 S C I E,N C E NOVUM ORGANUM OR TRUE SUGGESTIONS FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF NATURE PREFACE They who have presumed to dogmatize on nature, as on some well investigated subject, either from self-conceit or arrogance, and in the professorial style, have inflicted the greatest injury on philosophy and learning. For they have tended to stifle and interrupt inquiry exactly in pro- portion as they have prevailed in bringing others to their opinion: and their own activity has not counterbalanced the mischief they have occasioned by corrupting and de- stroying that of others. They again who have entered upon a contrary course, and asserted that nothing whatever can be known, whether they have fallen into this opinion from their hatred of the ancient sophists, or from the hesitation of their minds, or from an exuberance of learning, have certainly adduced reasons for it which are by no means contemptible. They have not, however, derived their opinion from true sources, and, hurried on by their zeal and some affectation, have certainly exceeded due modera- tion. But the more ancient Greeks (whose writings have perished), held a more prudent mean, between the arro- gance of dogmatism, and the despair of scepticism; and though too frequently intermingling complaints and indig- (5) 6 pbS^CW nation at the difficulty of inquiry, and the obscurity of things, and champing, as it were, the bit, have still per- sisted in pressing .their point, and pursuing their inter- course with nature; thinking, as it seems, that the better method was not to dispute upon the very point of the pos- sibility of anything being known, but to put it to the test of experience. Yet they themselves, by only employing the power of the understanding, have not adopted a fixed rule, but have laid their whole stress upon intense medita- tion, and a continual exercise and perpetual agitation of the mind. Our method, though difficult in its operation, is easily explained. It consists in determining the degrees of cer- tainty, while we, as it were, restore the senses to their former rank, but generally reject that operation of the mind which follows close upon the senses, and open and establish a new and certain course for the mind from the first actual perceptions of the senses themselves. This, no doubt, was the view taken by those who have assigned so much to logic; showing clearly thereby that they sought some, support for the mind, and suspected its natural and spontaneous mode of action. But this is now employed too late as a remedy, when all is clearly lost, and after the mind,Jby the daily habit and intercourse of life, has come prepossessed with corrupted doctrines, and filled with the vainest idols. The art of logic therefore being (as we have mentioned), too late a precaution," and in no way remedy- ' Because it was idle to draw a logical conclusion from false principles, error being propagated as much by false premises, wliich logic does not pretend to r examine, as by illegitimate inference. Hence, as Bacon says further on, men I being easily led lo confound legitimate inference with truth, were confirmed V in their errors by the very subtilty of their genius. — Ed. TKeface 7 ing the matter, has tended more to confirm errors, than to disclose truth. Our only remaining hope and salvation is to begin the whole labor of the mind again; not leaving it to itself, but directing it perpetually from the very first, and attaining our end as it were by mechanical aid. If men, for instance, had attempted mechanical labors with their hands alone, and without the power and aid of instru- ments, as they have not hesitated to carry on the labors of their understanding with the unaided efforts of their mind, they would have been able to move and overcome but little, though they had exerted their utmost 'and united powers. And just to pause awhile on this comparison, and look into it as a mirror ; let us ask, if any obelisk of a remarkable size were perchance required to be moved, for the purpose of gracing a triumph or any similar pag- eant, and men were to attempt it with their bare hands, would not any sober spectator avow it to be an act of the greatest madness? And if they should increase the num- ber of workmen, and imagine that they could thus succeed, would he not think so still more ? But if they chose to make a selection, and to remove the weak, and only employ the strong and vigorous, thinking by this means, at any rate, to achieve their object, would he not say that they were more fondly deranged ? Nay, if not content with this, they were to determine on consulting the athletic art, and were to give orders for all to appear with their hands, arms, and muscles regularly oiled and prepared, would he not exclaim that they were taking pains to rave by method and design ? Yet men are hurried on with the same senseless energy and useless combination in intellectual matters, as long as they expect great results either from the number and agreement, or the excellence and acuteness of their wits; or even 8 PREFACE strengthen their minds with logic, which may be con- sidered as an athletic preparation, but yet do not desist (if we rightly consider the matter) from applying their own understandings merely with all this zeal and effort. While nothing is more clear, than that in every great work exe- cuted by the hand of man without machines or implements, it is impossible for the strength of individuals to be in- creased, or for that of the multitude to combine. Having premised so much, we lay down two points on which we would admonish mankind, lest they should fail to see or to observe them. The first of these is, that it is our good fortune (as we consider it), for the sake of extin- guishing and removing contradiction and irritation of mind, to leave the honor and reverence due to the ancients un- touched and undiminished, so that we can perform our intended work, and yet enjoy the benefit of our respectful moderation. For if we should profess to offer something better than the ancients, and yet should pursue the same course as they have done, we could never, by any artifice, contrive to avoid the imputation of having engaged in a contest or rivalry as to our respective wits, excellences, or talents; which, though neither inadmissible nor new (for why should we not blame and point out anything that is imperfectly discovered or laid down by them,* of our own right, a right common to all?), yet however just and allow- able, would perhaps be scarcely an equal match, on account of the dispropo rtion of our strength. But since our present plan leads up to open an entirely different course to the understanding, and one unattempted and unknown to them, the case is altered. There is an end to party zeal, and we only take upon ourselves the character of a guide, which requires a moderate share of authority and good fortune PREFACE 9 rather than talents and excellence. The first admonition relates to persons, the next to things. We make no attempt to disturb the system of philosophy that now prevails, or any other which may or will exist, either more correct or more complete. For we deny not that the received system of philosophy, and others of a similar nature, encourage discussion, embellish harangues, are employed, and are of service in the duties of the pro- fessor, and the afEairs of civil life. Nay, we openly express and declare that the philosophy we offer will not be very useful in such respects. It is not obvious, nor to be under- stood in a cursory view, nor does it flatter the mind in its preconceived notions, nor will it descend to the level of the generality of mankind unless by its advantages and effects. Let there exist then (and may it be of advantage to both), two sources, and two distributions of learning, and in like manner two tribes, and as it were kindred families of contemplators or philosophers, without any hostility or alienation between them; but rather allied and united by mutual assistance. Let there be in short one method of cultivating the sciences, and another of discovering them. And as for those who prefer and more readily re- ceive the former, on account of their haste or from motives arising from their ordinary life, or because they are unable from weakness of mind to comprehend and embrace the other (wjiich must necessarily be the case with by far the greater number), let us wish that they may prosper as they desire in their undertaking, and attain what they pursue. But if any individual desire, and is anxious not merely to adhere to, and make use of present discoveries, but to pene- trate still further, and not to overcome his adversaries in disputes, but nature by labor, not in short to give elegant 10 PREFACE and specious opinions, but to know to a certainty and dem- onstration, let him, as a true son of science (if such be his wish), join with us; that when he has left the antechambers of nature trodden by the multitude, an entrance may at last be discovered to her inner apartments. And in order to be better understood, and to render our meaning more familiar by assigning determinate names, we have accustomed our- selves to call the one method the anticipation of the mind, and the other the interpretation of nature. We have still one request left. We have at least re- flected and taken pains in order to render our propositions not only true, but of easy and familiar access to men's minds, however wonderfully prepossessed and limited. Yet it is but just that we should obtain this favor from mankind (especially in so great a restoration of learning and the sciences), that whosoever may be desirous of form- ing any determination upon an opinion of this our work either from his own perceptions, or the crowd of authori- ties, or the forms of demonstrations, he will not expect to be able to do so in a cursory manner, and while attending to other matters; but in order to have a thorough knowledge of the subject, will himself by degrees attempt the course which we describe and maintain; will be accustomed to the subtilty of things which is manifested by experience; and will correct the depraved and deeply rooted habits of his mind by a seasonable, and, as it were, just hesitation: and then, finally (if he will), use his judgment when he has begun to be master of himself. APHORISMS— BOOK I ON the" interpretation of nature and the EMPIRE OF MAN I. Man, as the minister and interpreter of nature, does and understands as much as his observations on the order ' of nature, either with regard to things or the mind, permit him, and neither knows nor is capable of more. II. The unassisted hand and the understanding left to itself possess but little power. Effects are produced by the means of instruments and helps, which the understanding requires no less than the hand; and as instruments either promote or regulate the motion of the hand, so those that are applied to the mind prompt or protect the understanding. III. Knowledge and human power are synonymous, since the ignorance of the cause frustrates the effect; for nature is only subdued by submission, and that which in contem- plative philosophy corresponds with the cause in practical science becomes the rule. IV. Man while operating can only apply or withdraw natural bodies ; nature internally performs the rest. V. Those who become practically versed in nature are, the mechanic, the mathematician, the physician, the al- chemist, and the magician,^ but all (as matters now stand) with faint efforts and meagre success. • Bacon uses the term in its ancient sense, and means one who, knowing the occult properties of bodies, is able to startle the ignorant by drawing out of them wonderful and unforeseen changes. See the 85th aphorism of this boolc, and the 5th cap. book iii. of the De Augmentis Bcientiarum, where he speaks more clearly — Ed. (11) 12 NOVUM ORGANUM VI. It would be madness and inconsistency to suppose that things which have never yet been performed can be performed without employing some hitherto untried means. VII. The creations of the mind and hand appear very numerous, if we judge by books and manufactures; but all that variety consists of an excessive refinement, and of de- ductions from a few well known matters — not of a number of axioms.^ VIII. Even the effects already discovered are due to chance and experiment rather than to the sciences ; for our present sciences are nothing more than peculiar arrange- ments of matters already discovered, and not methods for discovery or plans for new operations. IX. The sole cause and root of almost every defect in the sciences is this, that while we falsely admire and extol the powers of the human mind, we do not search for its real helps. X. The subtilty of nature is far beyond that of sense or of the understanding: so that the specious meditations, speculations, and theories of mankind are but a kind of insanity, only there is no one to stand by and observe it. XI. As the present sciences are useless for the discovery of effects, so the present system of logic' is useless for the discovery of the sciences. ■•' By this term axiomata, Bacon here speaks of general principles, or univer- sal laws. In the 19th aphorism he employs the term to express any proposition collected from facts by induction, and thus fitted to become the starting-point of deductive reasoning. In the last and more rigorous sense of the term. Bacon held they arose from experience. See Whewell's "Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences," vol. i. p. 1i; and Mill's "Logic," vol. i. p. 311; and the June "Quarterly," 1841, for the modern phase of the discussion. — Ed. ' Bacon here attributes to the Aristotelian logic the erroneous consequences which sprung out of its abuse. The demonstrative forms it exhibits, whether verbally or mathematically expressed, are necessary to the support, verification NOVUM OBGANUM IS XII. The present system of logic rather assists in con- firming and rendering inveterate the errors founded on vulgar notions than in searching after truth, and is there- fore more hurtful than useful. XIII. The syllogism is not applied to the principles of the sciences, and is of no avail in intermediate axioms,* as and extension of induction, and when the propositions they embrace are founded on an accurate and close observation of facts, the conclusions to which they lead, even in moral science, may be regarded as certain as the facts wrested out of nature by direct experiment. In physics such forms are absolutely required to generalize the results of experience, and to connect intermediate axioms with laws still more general, as is sufficiently attested by the fact, that no science since Bacon's day has ceased to be experimental by the mere method of induc- tion, and that all become exact only so far as they rise above experience, and connect their isolated phenomena with general laws by the principles of deduc- tive reasoning. So far, then, are these forms from being useless, that they are absolutely essential to the advancement of the sciences, and in no case can be looked on as detrimental, except when obtruded in the place of direct experi- ment, or employed as a means of deducing conclusions about nature from im- aginary hypotheses and abstract conceptions. This had been unfortunately the practice of the Greeks. Prom the rapid development geometry received in their hands, they im^ined the same method would lead to results equally brilliant in natural science, and snatching up some abstract principle, which they carefully removed from the test of experiment, imagined they could reason out from it all the laws and external appearances of the universe. The scholastics were im- pelled along the same path, not only by precedent, but by profession. Theology was the only science which received from them a consistent development, and the A priori grounds on which it rested prevented them from employing any other method in the pursuit of natural phenomena. Thus, forms of demonstra- tion, in themselves accurate, and of momentous value in their proper sphere, became confounded with fable, and led men Into the idea they were exploring truth when they were only accurately deducing error from error. One principle ever so slightly deflected, like a false quantity in an equation, could be sufficient to infect the whole series of conclusions of which it was the base ; and though the philosopher might subsequently deduce a thousand consecutive inferences with the utmost accuracy or precision, he would only succeed in drawing out very methodically nine hundred and ninety-nine errors. — Ed. * It would appear from this and the two preceding aphorisms, that Bacon fell into the error of denying the utility of the syllogism in the very part of inductive science where it is essentially required. Logic, like mathematics, is 14 NOVUM ORGANUM being very unequal to the subtilty of nature. It forces assent, therefore, and not things. XI Y. The syllogism consists of propositions; proposi- tions of words; words are the signs of notions. If, there- fore, the notions (which form the basis of the whole) be confused and carelessly abstracted from things, there is no solidity in the superstructure. Our only hope, then, is in genuine induction. XV. We have no sound notions either in logic or phys- ics; substance, quality, action, passion, and existence are not clear notions; much less weight, levity, density, tenu- ity, moisture, dryness, generation, corruption, attraction, purely a formal process, and must, as the scaffolding to the building, be em- ployed to arrange facts in the structure of a science, and not to form any por- tion of its groundwork, or to supply the materials of which the system is to be composed. The word syllogism, like most other pyschological terms, has no fixe'd or original signifloation, but is sometimes employed, as it was by the Greeks, to denote general reasoning, and at others to point out the formal method of deducing a particula r inference from two or more general proposi- tions. Bacon does not confine the term within the boundaries of express defi- nition, but leaves us to infer that he took it in the latter sense, from his custom of associating the term with the wranglings of the schools. The scholastics, it is true, abused the deductive syllogism, by employing it in its naked, skeleton- like form, and confounding it with the whole breadth of logical theory; but their errors are not to be visited on Aristotle, who never dreamed of playing with formal syllogisms, and, least of all, mistook the descending for the ascend- ing series of inference. In our mind we are of accord with the Stagyrite, who propounds, as far as we can interpret him, two modes of investigating truth— the one by which we ascend from particular and singular facts to general lawB and axioms, and the other by which we descend from universal propositions to the individual cases which they virtually include. Logic, therefore, must equally vindicate the formal purity of the synthetic illation by which it ascends to the whole, as the analytic process by which it descends to the parts. The deductive and inductive syllogism are of equal significance in building up any body of truth, and whoever restricts logic to either process, mistakes one-half of its province for the whole ; and if he acts upon his error, will paralyze his meth- ods, and strike the noblest part of science with sterility. — Sd. NOVUM OSGANUM 16 repulsion, element, matter, form, and the like. They are all fantastical and ill-defined. XYI. The notions of less abstract natures, as man, dog, dove, and the immediate perceptions of sense, as heat, cold, white, black, do not deceive us materially, yet even these are sometimes confused by the mutability of matter and the intermixture of things. All the rest which men have hitherto employed are errors, and improperly abstracted and deduced from things. XVII. There is the same degree of licentiousness and error in forming axioms as in abstracting notions, and that in the first principles, which depend on common induction; still more is this the case in axioms and inferior proposi- tions derived from syllogisms. XVni. The present discoveries in science are such as lie immediately beneath the surface of common notions. It is necessary, however, to penetrate the more secret and re- mote parts of nature, in order to abstract both notions and axioms from things by a more certain and guarded meth od. XIX. There are and can exist but two ways of investi- gating and discovering truth. The one hurries on rapidly from the senses and particulars to the most general axioms, and from them, as principles and their supposed indisput- 1 able truth, derives and discovers the intermediate axioms. This is the way now in use. The other constructs its axioms from the senses and particulars, by ascending continually and gradually, till it finally arrives at the most general axioms, which is t .hff t.rnfi hnt. nnattpmpted wav. XX. The understanding when left to itself proceeds by the same way as that which it would have adopted under the guidance of logic, namely, the first; for the mind is fond of starting ofE to generalities, that it may avoid labor, and 16 NOVUM OBOANUM after dwelling a little on a subject is fatigued by experiment. But those evils are augmented by logic, for the sake of the ostentation of dispute. XXI. The understanding, when left to itself in a man of a steady, patient, and reflecting disposition (especially when unimpeded by received doctrines), makes some attempt in the right way, but with little efiect, since the understanding, undirected and unassisted, is unequal to and unfit for the task of vanquishing the obscurity of things. XXII. Each of these two ways begins from the senses and particulars, and ends in the greatest generalities. But they are immeasurably different; for the one merely touches cursorily the limits of experiment and particulars, while the other runs duly and regularly through them — the one from the very outset lays down some abstract and useless general- ities, the other gradually rises to those principles which are really the most common in nature." XXIII. There is no small difference between the idols of the human mind an d the ideas of th e Divine mind — that is to sayTlaetween certain idle dogmas and the real stamp and impression of , created objects, as they are found in nature. XXIV. Axioms determined upon in argument can never assist in the discovery of new effects; for the subtilty of nature is vastly superior to that of argument. But axioms properly and regularly abstracted from particulars easily ' The Latin 13, ad ea qwcB revera sunt natures notiora. This expression •aatiirce notiora, naturce noiior, is so frequently employed by Bacon, that we may conclude it to point to some distinguishing feature in the Baconian physics. It properly refers to the most evident principles and laws of nature, and springs from that system which regards the material universe as endowed with intelli- gence, and acting according to rules either fashioned or clearly understood by itself.— £d. NOVUM ORQANUM 17 'point out and define new particulars, and therefore impart ^tivity to the sciences. XXV. The axioms now in use are derived from a scanty handful, as it were, of experience, and a few particulars of frequent occurrence, whence they are of much the same dimensions or extent as their origin. And if any neglected or unknown instance occurs, the axiom is saved by some frivolous distinction, when it would be more consistent with truth to amend it. ^-^^ XXYI. We are wont, for the sake of distinction, to call that human reasoning which we apply to nature the antici- pation of nature (as being rash and premature), and that which is properly deduced from things the interpretation of nature. XXVII. An ticipations a re sufficiently powerful in pro- ducing unanimity, for if men were all to become even uni- formly mad, they might agree tolerably well with each other. XXVIII. Anticipations again, will be assented to much more readily than interpretations, because being deduced from a few instances, and these principally of familiar oc- currence, they immediately hit, the understanding and sat- isfy the imagination; while, on the contrary, interpretations, being deduced from various subjects, and these widely dis- persed, cannot suddenly strike the understanding, so that in common estimation they must appear difficult and discord- ant, and almost like the mysteries of faith. XXIX. In sciences founded on opinions and dogmas, it is right to make use of anticipations and logic if you wish to force assent rather than things. XXX. If all the capacities of all ages should unite and combine and transmit their labors, no great progress will be 18 NOVUM OBGAISUM made in learning by anticipations, because the radical errors, and those which occur in the first process of the mind, are not cured by the excellence of subsequent means and reme- dies. XXXI. It is in vain to expect any great progress in the sciences by the superinducing or ingrafting new matters upon old. An instauration must be made from the very foundations, if we do not wish to revolve forever in a cir- cle, making only some slight and contemptible progress. XXXII. The ancient authors and all others are left in undisputed possession of their honors; for we enter into no comparison of ca^pacity or talent, but qfjnethod, and assume the part of a guide rather than of a critic. XXXIII. To speak plainly, no correct judgment can be formed either of our method or its discoveries by those an- ticipations which are now in common use ; for it is not to be required of us to submit ourselves to the judgment of the very method we ourselves arraign. XXXIY. Nor is it an easy matter to deliver and explain our sentiments; for those things which are in themselves new can yet be only understood from some analogy to what is old. XXXV. Alexander Borgia' said of the expedition of the French into Italy that they came with chalk in their hands to mark up their lodgings, and not with weapons to force their passage. Even so do we wish our philosophy to make its^way quietly into those minds that are fit for it, and of good capacity; for we have no need of contention where we « This Borgia was Alexander VI., and the expedition alluded to that in which Charles VIII. overran the Italian peninsula in five months. Bacon uses the same illustration in concluding his survey of natural philosophy, in the sec- ond book of the "De Augmentis." — Ed. NOVUM OBQANUM 19 differ in first principles, and in our very notions, and even in our forms of demonstration. XXXYI. We have but one simple method of delivering our sentiments, namely, we must bring men to particulars and their regular series and order, and they must for a while renounce their notions, and begin to form an acquaintance with things. XXXVII. Our method and that of the sceptics' agree in some respects at first setting out, but differ most widely, and are completely opposed to each other in their conclu- sion; for they roundly assert that nothing can be known; we, that but a small part of nature can be knoWn, by the present method; their next step, however, is to destroy the authority of the senses and understanding, while we invent and supply them with assistance. XXXVIII. The idols and false notions which have al- ready preoccupied the human understanding, and are deeply rooted in it, not only so beset men's minds that they become difficult of access, but even when access is obtained will again meet and trouble us in the instauration of the sciences, un- less mankind when forewarned guard themselves with all possible care against them. XXXIX. Four species of idols beset the human mind," ■■ Ratio eorum qui acatalepsiam tenuerunt. Bacon alludes to the members of the later academy, who held the o/caraXTjijiia, or the impossibility of compre- hendiDg anything. His translator, however, makes him refer to the sceptics, who neither dogmatized about the known or the unknown, but simply held, that as all knowledge was relative, irpbs iravra ti, man could never arrive at absolute truth, and therefore could not with certainty affirm or deny any- thing. — Ed. 8 It is argued by Hallam, with some appearance of truth, that idols is not the correct translation of "5m^«, from which the original idola is manifestly de- rived ; but that Bacon used it In the literal sense attached to it by the Greeks, as a species of illusion, or false appearance, and not as a species of divinity be- 20 NOVUM OBGANUM to which (for distinction's sake) we have assigned names, calling the first Idols of the Tribe, the second Idols of the Den, the third Idols of the Market, the fourth Idols of the Theatre. XL. The formation of notions and axioms on the foun- dation of true induction is the only fitting remedy by which we can ward off and expel these idols. It is, however, of great service to point them out; for the doctrine of idols bears the same relation to the interpretation of nature as that of the confutation of sophisms does to common logic." XLI. The idols of the tribe are inherent in human nature and the very tribe or race of man; for man's sense is falsely asserted to be the standard of things; on the contrary, all the perceptions both of the senses and the mind bear refer- ence to man and not to the universe, and the human mind resembles those uneven mirrors which impart their own fore which the mind bowa down. If Hallam be right, Bacon Is saved from the odium of an analogy which his foreign commentators are not far wrong in de- nouncing as barbarous; but this service is rendered at the expense of the men who have attached an opposite meaning to the word, among whom are Brown, Playfair and Dugald Stewart. — Ed. ' We cannot see how these idols have less to do with sophistical paralogisms than with natural philosophy. The process of soientilio induction involves only the first elements of reasoning, and presents such a clear and tangible surface, as to allow no lurking-place for prejudice; while questions of politics and morals, to which the deductive method, or common logic, as Bacon calls it, is peculiarly applicable, are ever liable to be swayed or perverted by the preju- dices he enumerates. After mathematics, physical science is the least amenable to the illusions of feeling ; each portion having been already tested by experi- ment and observation, is fitted into its place in the system, with all the rigor of the geometrical method; affiectiou or prejudice cannot, as in matters of taste, history or religion, select fragmentary pieces, and form a system of their own. The whole must be admitted, or the structure of authoritative reason razed to the ground. It is needless to say that the idols enumerated present only another interpretation of the substance of logical faUaoies. — Ed. NOVUM OBGANUM 21 properties to different objects, from which rays are emitted and distort and disfigure them." XLII. The idols of the den are those of each individual; for everybody (in addition to the errors common to the race of man) has his own individual den or cavern, which inter- cepts and corrupts the light of nature, either from his own peculiar and singular disposition, or from his education and intercourse with others, or from his reading, and the author- ity acquired' by those whom he reverences and admires, or from the difEerent impressions produced on the mind, as it happens to be preoccupied and predisposed, or equable and tranquil, and the like ; so that the spirit of man (according to its several dispositions), is variable, confused, and as it were actuated by chance; and Heraclitus said well that men search for knowledge in lesser worlds, and not- in the greater or common world. XLIII. There are also idols formed by the reciprocal in- tercourse and society of man with man, which we call idols of the market, from the commerce and association of men with each other; for men converse by means of language, but words are formed at the will of the generality, and there arises from a bad and unapt formation of words a wonderful obstruction to the mind. Nor can the definitions and ex- planations with which learned men are wont to guard and protect themselves in some instances afford a complete rem- edy — words still manifestly force the understanding, throw everything into confusion, and lead mankind into vain and innumerable controversies and fallacies. XLIV. Lastly, there are idols which have crept into «» The propensity to this illusion may be viewed in the spirit oi system, or hasty generalization, which is fW. one of the cliief obstacles in the path of modern science. — Ei. z;a , NOVUM oboanum men's minds from the various dogmas of peculiar systems of philosophy, and also from the perverted rules of demon- stration, and these we denominate idols of the theatre : for we regard all the systems of philosophy hitherto received or imagined, as so many plays brought out and performed, creating fictitious and theatrical worlds. Nor do we speak only of the present systems, or of the philosophy and sects of the ancients, since numerous other plays of a similar nature can be still composed and made to agree with each other, the causes of the most opposite errors being generally the same. Nor, again, do we allude merely to general sys- tems, but also to many elements and axioms of sciences which have become inveterate by tradition, implicit cre- dence, and neglect. We must, however, discuss each spe- cies of idols more fully and distinctly in order to guard the human understanding against them. XLV. The human understanding, from its peculiar na- ture, easily supposes a greater degree of order and equality in things than it really finds; and although many things in nature be sui generis and most irregular, will yet invent parallels and conjugates and relatives, where no such thing is. Hence the fiction, that all celestial bodies move in per- fect circles, thus rejecting entirely spiral and serpentine lines (except as explanatory terms)." Hence also the ele- " Though Kepler had, when Bacon wrote this, already demonstrated his three great laws concerning the elliptical path of the planets, neither Bacon nor Descjirtes seems to have known or assented to his discoveries. Our author deemed the startling astronomical announcements of his time to be mere theo- retic solutions of the phenomena of the heavens, not so perfect as those ad- vanced by antiquity, but still deserving a praise for the ingenuity displayed in their contrivance. Bacon believed a hundred such systems might exist, and though true in their explanation of phenomena, yet might all more or less diSer, according to the preconceived notions which their framers brought to the survey of the heavens. He even thought he might put in his claim to the NOVUM OBGANUM 23 toent of fire is introduced with its peculiar orbit," to keep square with those other three which are objects of our senses. The relative rarity of the elements (as they are called) is arbitrarily made to vary in tenfold progression, with many other dreams of the like nature." Nor is this folly confined to theories, but it is to be met with even in simple notions. XLVI. The human understanding, when any proposi- tion has been once laid down (either from general admission and belief, or from the pleasure it affords), forces everything else to add fresh support and confirmation; and although most cogent and abundant instances may exist to the con- trary, yet either does not observe or despises them, or gets rid of and rejects them by some distinction, with violent and injurious prejudice, rather than sacrifice the authority of its first conclusions. It was well answered by him" -sjrho was notice of posterity for his astronomical ingenuity, and, as Ptolemy had labored by means of epicycles and eccentrics, and Kepler with ellipses, to explain the laws of planetary motion. Bacon thought the mystery would unfold itself quite as philosophically through spiral labyrinths and serpentine lines. What the" details of his system were, we are left to conjecture, and that from a very meagre but naive account of one of his inventions which he has left in hia MisceUany USS.—M. '^ Sine elementum ignis cmn orhe suo introductum est. Bacon saw in Are the mere result of a certain combination of action, and was consequently led to deny its elementary character. The ancient physicists attributed an orbit to each of the four elements, into which they resolved the universe, and supposed their spheres to involve each other. The orbit of the earth was in the centre, that of fire at the circumference. For Bacon's inquisition into the nature of heat, and its complete failure, see the commencement of the second book of the Novum Organum. — Ed. '^ Bobert Fludd is the theorist alluded to, who had supposed the gravity of the earth to be ten times heavier than water, that of water ten times heavier than air, and that of air ten times heavier than fire. — Sd. '* Diagoras. The same allusion occurs in the second part of the Advance ment of Learning, where Bacon treats of the idols of the mind. Z* NOVUM OUUAIWM shown in a temple the votive tablets suspended by such as had escaped the peril of shipwreck, and was pressed as to whether he would then recognize the power of the gods, by an inquiry, But where are the portraits of those who have perished in spite of their vows ? All superstition is much the same, whether it be that of astrology, dreams, omens, retributive judgment, or the like, in all of which the deluded believers observe events which are fulfilled, but neglect and pass over their failure, though it be much more common. But this evil insinuates itself still more craftily in philoso- phy and the sciences, in which a settled maxim vitiates and governs every other circumstance, though the latter be much more worthy of confidence. Besides, even in the absence of that eagerness and want of thought (which we have men- tioned), it is the peculiar and perpetual error of the human understanding to be more moved and excited by affirmatives than negatives, whereas it ought duly and regularly to be impartial; nay, in establishing any true axiom the negative instance is the most powerful. ~ XL VII. The human understanding is most excited by that which strikes and enters the mind at once and sud- denly, and by which the imagination is immediately filled and inflated. It then begins almost imperceptibly to con- ceive and suppose that everything is • similar to the few objects which have taken possession of the mind, while it is very slow and unfit for the transition to the remote and heterogeneous instances by which axioms are tried as by fire, unless the office be imposed upon it by severe regula- tions and a powerful authority. XL VIII. The human understanding is active and cannot halt or rest, but even, though without ejBEeet, still presses forward. Thus we cannot conceive of any end or external JSUVUM OBOANUM 25 boundary of the world, and it seems necessarily to occur to us that there must be something beyond. Nor can wo imagine how eternity has flowed on down to the present day, since the usually received distinction of an infinity, a parte ante and a parte post," cannot hold good; for it would thence follow that one infinity is greater than an- other, and also that infinity is wasting away and tending to an end. There is the same difficulty in considering the infinite divisibility of lines, arising from the weakness of our minds, which weakness interferes to still greater dis- advantage with the discovery of causes; for although the greatest generalities in nature must be positive, just as they are found, and in fact not causable, yet the human understanding, incapable of resting, seeks for something more intelligible. Thus, however, while aiming at further progress, it falls back to what is actually less advanced, namely, final causes; for they are clearly more allied to man's own nature, than the system of the universe, and from this source they have wonderfully corrupted philoso- phy. But he would be an unskilful and shallow philoso- pher who should seek for causes in the greatest generalities, " A scholastic term, to signify the two eternities of past and future dura- tion, that stretch out on both sides of the narrow isthmus (time) occupied by man. It must be remembered that Bacon lived before the doctrine of limits gave rise to the higher calculus, and therefore could have no conception of dif- ferent denominations of infinities : on the other hand he would have thought the man insane who should have talked to him about lines infinitely great, in- closing angles infinitely Uttle; that a right line, which is a right line so long as it is finite, by changing infinitely little its direction, becomes an infinite curVe, and that a curve may become infinitely less than another curve; that there are infinite squares and infinite cubes, and infinites of infinites, all greater than ono another, and the last but one of "which is nothing in comparison with the last. Tot half a century suSBced from Bacon's time, to make this nomenclaturs, which would have appeared to him the excess of frenzy, not only reasonabL but neoessaty, to grasp the higher demonstrations of physical science. — Ed, 26 NOVUM ORQANUM and not be anxious to discover them in subordinate objects. XLIX. The human understanding resembles not a dry- light, but admits a tincture of the will '" and passions, which generate their own system accordingly; for man always be- lieves more readily that wbich he prefers. He, therefore, rejects difficulties for want of patience in investigation; sobriety, because it limits his hope; the depths of nature, from superstition; the light of experiment, from arrogance and pride, lest his mind should appear to be occupied with common and varying objects; paradoxes, from a fear of the opinion of the vulgar; in short, his feelings imbue and corrupt his understanding in innumerable and sometimes imperceptible ways. L. But by far the greatest impediment and aberration of the human understanding proceeds from the dulness, incompetence, and errors of the senses; since whatever strikes the senses preponderates over everything, however superior, which does not immediately strike them. Hence contemplation mostly ceases with sight, and a very scanty, or perhaps no regard is paid to invisible objects. The entire operation, therefore, of spirits inclosed in tangible bodies" is concealed, and escapes us. All that more delicate change of formation in the parts of coarser substances (vulgarly " Spinoza, in his letter to Oldenberg (Op. Poath. p. 398), considers this apliorism based on a wrong conceptioa of the origin of error, and, believing it to be fundamental, was led to reject Bacon's method altogether. Spinoza re- fused to acknowledge in man any such thing as a will, and resolved all his volitions into particular acts, which he considered to be as fatally determined by a chain of physical causes as any effects in nature.— £d. " Operatio spirituum in corporibm tangibHitms. Bacon distinguished with the schools the gross and tangible parts of bodies, from such as were volatile and intangible. These, in conformity with the scholastic language, he terms spirits, and frequently returns to their operations in the 8d book.— £d. NOVUM ORGANUM 27 called alteration, but in fact a change of position in the smallest particles) is equally unknown ; and yet, unless the two matters we have mentioned be explored and brought to light, no great effect can be produced in nature. Again, the very nature of common air, and all bodies of less den- sity (of which there are many) is almost unknown; for the senses are weak and erring, nor can instruments be of great use in extending their sphere or acuteness — all the better interpretations of nature are worked out by instances, and fit and apt experiments, where the senses only judge of the experiment, the experiment of nature and the thing itself. LI. The human understanding is, by its own nature, prone to abstraction, and supposes that which is fluctuating to be fixed. But it is better to dissect than abstract nature: such was the method employed by the school of Democ- ritus," which made greater progress in penetrating nature than the rest. It is best to consider matter, its conforma- tion, and the changes of that conformation, its own action," and the law of this action or motion ; for forms are a mere fiction of the human mind, unless you will call the laws of action by that name." 18 Demooritus, of Abdera, a disciple of Lencippus, bom B.C. 470, died 360; all his works are destroyed. He ia said to be the author of the doctrine of atoms: he denied the inunortality of the soul, and first taught that the milky way was occasioned by a confused light from a multitude of stars. He may be considered as the parent of experimental philosophy, in the prosecution of which he was so ardent as to declare that be would prefer the discovery of one of the causes of natural phenomena, to the possession of the diadem of Persifk. Democritus imposed on the blind credulity of hia contemporaries, and, like Soger Bacon, astonished them by his inventions. — Ed. " The Latin is actus purus, another scholastic expression to denote the action of the aabatanoe, which composes the essence of the body apart from ite accidental qualities. For an exposition of the various kinds of motions he con- templates, the reader may refer to the 48th aphorism of the 2d book. — Ed. ^0 The scholastics after Aristotle distinguished in a subject three modes of SoiENOB— Vol. 23 —a 28 NOVUM OBOANUM LII. Such are the idols of the tribe, which arise eithei from the uniformity of the constitution of man's spirit, oi its prejudices, or its limited faculties or restless agitation, or from the interference of the passions, or the incompetence of the senses, or the mode of their impressions. LIII. The idols of the den derive their origin from tht peculiar nature of each individual's mind and body, and also from education, habit, and accident; and although thej be various and manifold, yet we will treat of some that re^ quire the greatest caution, and exert the greatest power ic polluting the understanding. LIV. Some men become attached to particular sciences and contemplations, either from supposing themselves the authors and inventors of them, or from having bestowed the greatest pains upon such subjects, and thus become most habituated to them." If men of this description apply themselves to philosophy and contemplations of a universal beings: viz., the power or faculty, the act, and the habitude, or in other words that which is able to exist, what exists actually, and what continues to exist. Bacon means that is necessary to fix our attention not on that which cat or ought to be, but on that which actually is; not on the right, but on the UQ.i.—Ed. '' The inference to be drawn from this is to suspect that kind of evidence which is moat consonant to our inclinations, and not to admit any notion as real except we can base it firmly upon that kind of demonstration which is peculiai to the subject, not to our impression. Sometimes the mode of proof may be consonant to our inclinations, and to the subject at the same time, as in the case of Pythagoras, when he applied his beloved numbers to the solution ol astronomical phenomena; or in that of Descartes, when he reasoned geomet rically concerning the nature of the soul. Such examples cannot be censured with justice, inasmuch as the methods pursued were adapted to the end of the inquiry. The remark in the text can only apply to those philosophers who at tempt to build up a moral or theological system by the instruments of inductioi alone, or who rush, with the geometrical axiom, and the A priori syllogism t( the investigation of nature. The means in sucb cases are tottilly inadequate to the object in view. — Ed. NOVUM ORtfANUM 29 nature, they wrest and corrupt them by their preconceived iancies, of which Aristotle affords us a single instance, who made his natural philosophy completely subservient to his logic, and thus rendered it little more than useless and dis- putatious. The chemists, again, have formed a fanciful philosophy with the most confined views, from a few ex- periments of the furnace. Gilbert," too, having employed himself most assiduously in the consideration of the magnet, immediately established a system of philosophy to coincide with his favorite pursuit. LY. The greatest and, perhaps, radical distinction be- tween different men's dispositions for philosophy and the sciences is this, that some are more vigorous and active in observing the differences of things, others in observing their resemblances ; for a steady and acute disposition can fix its thoughts, and dwell upon and adhere to a point, through all the refinements of differences, but those that are sub- lime and discursive recognize and compare even the most delicate and general resemblances; each of them readily falls into excess, by catching either at nice distinctions or shadows of resemblance. LVI. Some dispositions evince an unbounded admira- tion of antiquity, others eagerly embrace novelty, and but few can preserve the just medium, so as neither to tear up " Gdbert lived toward the close of the sixteenth century, and was court physician to both Elizabeth and James. In his work alluded to in the text he continually asserts the advantages of the experimental over the d priori method in physical inquiry, and succeeded when his censor failed in giving a practical example of the utility of his precepts. His "De Magnete" contains all the fundamental parts of the science, and these so perfectly treated, tha we have nothing to add to them at the present day. Gilbert adopted the Copernican system, and even spoke of the contrary theory as utterly absurd, grounding his argument on the vast velocities which such a supposition requires us to ascribe to the heavenly bodies. — Ed. so NOVUM OBGANUM what the ancients have correctly laid down, nor to despise the just innovations of the moderns. But this is very preju- dicial to the sciences and philosophy, and instead of a cor- rect judgment we have but the factions of the ancients and moderns. Truth is not to be sought in the good fortune of any particular conjuncture of time, which is uncertain, but in the light of nature and experience, which is eternal. Such factions, therefore, are to be abjured, and the under- standing must not allow them to hurry it on to assent. LVII. The contemplation of nature and of bodies in their individual form distracts and weakens the understand- ing; but the contemplation of nature and of bodies in their general composition and formation stupefies and relaxes it. We have a good instance of this in the school of Leucippus and Democritus compared with others, for they applied themselves so much to particulars as almost to neglect the general structure of things, while the others were so as- tounded while gazing on the structure that they did not penetrate the simplicity of nature. These two species of contemplation must, therefore, be interchanged, and each employed in its turn, in order to render the understanding at once penetrating and capacious, and to avoid the incon- veniences we have mentioned, and the idols that result from them. LVIII. Let such, therefore, be our precautions in con- templation, that we may ward off and expel the idols of the den, which mostly owe their birth either to some pre- dominant pursuit, or, secondly, to an excess in synthesis and analysis, or, thirdly, to a party zeal in favor of certain ages, or, fourthly, to the extent or narrowness of the sub- ject. In general, he who contemplates nature should sus- pect whatever particularly takes and fixes his understand- NOVUM ORGANUM 31 ing, and should use so much the more caution to preserve it equable and unprejudiced. LIX. The idols of the market are the most troublesome of all, those namely which have entwined themselves round the understanding from the associations of words and names. For men imagine that their reason governs words, while, in fact, words react upon the understanding; and this has ren- dered philosophy and the sciences sophistical and inactive. Words are generally formed in a popular sense, and define things by those broad lines which are most obvious to the vulgar mind; but when a more acute understanding or more diligent observation is anxious to vary those lines, and to adapt them more accurately to nature, words oppose it. Hence the great and solemn disputes of learned men often terminate in controversies about words and names, in regard to which it would be better (imitating the caution of mathematicians) to proceed more advisedly in the first instance, and to bring such disputes to a regular issue bj definitions. Such definitions, however, cannot remedy the evil in natural and material objects, because they consist themselves of words, and these words produce others;" so that we must necessarily have recourse to particular instances, and their regular series and arrangement, as we ^ The Latin text adds "without end" ; but Bacon is scarcely right in sup- posing that the descent from complex ideas and propositions to those of simple nature, involve the analyst in a series of continuous and interminable defini- tions. For in the gradual and analytical scale, there is a bar beyond which w« cannot go, as there is a summit bounded by the limited variations of our con- ceptions. Logical definitions, to fulfil their conditions, or indeed to be of any avail, must be given in simpler terms than the object which is sought to be defined ; now this, in the case of primordial notions and objects of sense, is im- possible ; therefore we are obliged to rest satisfied with the mere names of our perceptions. — Ed. 82 NOVUM OBGANUM shall mention when we come to the mode and scheme of determining notions and axioms. LX. The idols imposed upon the understanding by words are of two kinds. They are either the names of things which have no existence (for as some objects are from inattention left without a name, so names are formed by fanciful imagi- nations which are without an object), or they are the names of actual objects, but confused, badly defined, and hastily and irregularly abstracted from things. Fortune, the pri- mum mobile, the planetary orbits," the element of fire, and the like fictions, which owe their birth to futile and false theories, are instances of the first kind. And this species of idols is removed with greater facility, because it can be exterminated by the constant refutation or the desuetude of the theories themselves. The others, which are created by vicious and unskilful abstraction, are intricate and deeply rooted. Take some word, for instance, as moist, and let us examine how far the different significations of this word are consistent. It will be found that the word moist is nothing but a confused sign of different actions admitted of no set- tled and defined uniformity. For it means that which easily diffuses itself over another body; that which is indetermi- nable and cannot be brought to a consistency; that which " The ancients supposed the planets to describe an exact circle round the south. As observations increased and facts were disclosed, which were irrec- oncilable with this supposition, the earth was removed from the centre to some other point in the circle, and the planets were supposed to revolve in a sjtt&Uer circle (epicycle) round an imaginary point, which in its turn described a circle of which the earth was the centre. In proportion as observation elicited fresh facts, contradictory to these representations, other epicycles and eccentrics were added, involving additional confusion. Though Kepler had swept away all these complicated theories in the preceding century, by the demonstration of his three laws, which established the elliptical course of the planets, Bacon re- garded him and Copernicus in the same light as Ptolemy and Xenophanes. Sd NOVUM ORGANl/M 33 yields easily in every directioa; that which is easily divided &nd dispersed; that which is easily united and collected; that which easily flows and is put in motion; that which easily adheres to, and wets another body; that which is easily reduced to a liquid state though previously solid. "When, therefore, you come to predicate or impose this name, in one sense flame is moist, in another air is not moist, in another fine powder is moist, in another glass is moist; so that it is quite clear that this notion is hastily ab- stracted from water only, and common ordinary liquors, without any due verification of it. There are, however, different degrees of distortion and mistake in words. One of the least faulty classes is that of the names of substances, particularly of the less abstract and more defined species ^those then of chalk and mud are good, of earth bad); words signifying actions are more faulty, as to generate, to corrupt, to change; but the most faulty are those denoting qualities (except the immediate objects of sense), as heavy, light, rare, dense. Yet in all of these there must be some notions a little better than others, in proportion as a greater or less number of things come be- fore the senses. LXI. The idols of the theatre are not innate, nor do they introduce themselves secretly into the understanding, but they are manifestly instilled and cherished by the fic- tions of theories and depraved rules of demonstration. To attempt, however, or undertake their confutation would not be consistent with our declarations. For since we neither agree in our principles nor our demonstrations, all argument is out of the question. And it is fortunate that the ancients are left in possession of their honors. We detract nothing from them, seeing our whole doctrine relates only to the 34 NOVUM ORQANUM path to be pursued. The lame (as they say) m the path outstrip the swift who wander from it, and it is clear that the very skill and swiftness of him who runs not in the right direction must increase his aberration. Our method of discovering the sciences is such as to leave little to the acuteness and strength of wit, and indeed rather to level wit and intellect. For as in the drawing of a straight line, or accurate circle by the hand, much depends on its steadiness and practice, but if a ruler or compass be em- ployed there is little occasion for either; so it is with our method. Although, however, we enter into no individual confutations, yet a little must be said, first, of the sects and general divisions of these species of theories; secondly, something further to show that there are external signs of their weakness; and, lastly, we must consider the causes of so great a misfortune, and so long and general a unanimity in error, that we may thus render the access to truth less difficult, and that the human understanding may the more readily be purified, and brought to dismiss its idols. LXII. The idols of the theatre, or of theories, are numer- ous, and may, and perhaps will, be still more so. For un- less men's minds had been now occupied for many ages in religious and theological considerations, and civil govern- ments (especially monarchies), had been averse to novelties of that nature even in theory (so that men must apply to them with some risk and injury to their own fortunes, and not only without reward, but subject to contumely and envy), there is no doubt that many other sects of philoso- phers and theorists would have been introduced, like those which formerly flourished in such diversified abundance among the Greeks. For as many imaginary theories of the heavens can be deduced from the phenomena of the sky so NOVUM ORGANUM 35 it is even more easy to found many dogmas upon the phe- nomena of philosophy — and the plot of this our theatre resembles those of the poetical, where the plots which are invented for the stage are more consistent, elegant, and pleasurable than those taken from real history. In general, men take for the groundwork of their phi- losophy either too much from a few topics, or too little from many ; in either case their philosophy is founded on too nar- row a basis of experiment and natural history, and decides on too scanty grounds. For the theoretic philosopher seizes various common circumstances by experiment, without re- ducing them to certainty or examining and frequently con- sidering them, and relies for the rest upon meditation and the activity of his wit. There are other philosophers who have diligently and accurately attended to a few experiments, and have thence presumed to deduce and invent systems of philosophy, form- ing everything to conformity with them. A third set, from their faith and religious veneration, introduce theology and traditions; the absurdity of some among them having proceeded so far as to seek and derive the sciences from spirits and genii. There are, therefore, three sources of error and three species of false philosophy; the sophistic, empiric, and superstitious. LXIII. Aristotle affords the most eminent instance of the first; for he corrupted natural philosophy by logic — thus he formed the world of categories, assigned to the human soul, the noblest of substances, a genus determined by words of secondary operation, treated of density and rar- ily (by which bodies occupy a greater or lesset space), by the frigid distinctions of action and power, asserted that there was a peculiar and proper motion in all bodies, and 36 NOVUM OBQAmiM that if they shared in any other motion, it was owing to an external moving cause, and imposed innumerable arbitrary distinctions upon the nature of tilings; being everywhere more anxious as to definitions in teaching and the accuracy of the wording of his propositions, than the internal truth of things. And this is best shown by a comparison of his philosophy with the others of greatest repute among the Greeks. For the similar parts of Anaxagoras, the atoms of Leucippus and Democritus, the heaven and earth of Par- menides, the discord and concord of Empedoclcs," the reso- lution of bodies into the common nature of fire, and their condensation according to Heraclitus, exhibit some sprink- ling of natural philosophy, the nature of things, and experi- ment; while Aristotle's physics aro mere logical terms, and he remodelled the same subject in his metaphysics under a more imposing title, and more as a realist than a nominalist. Nor is much stress to be laid on his frequent recourse to ex- periment in his books on animals, his problems, and other treatises; for he had already decided, without having prop- erly consulted experience as the basis of his decisions and axioms, and alter having so decided, he drags experiment along as a captive constrained to accommodate herself to his decisions: so that he is even more to be blamed than his modern followers (of the seholastio school) who have de- serted her altogether. "> Bmpedocles, of Aorrigentum, flourished 444 B.C. He was the disciple of Telangea the Pythagorean, and warmly adopted the doctrino of transmigration. He resolved the miiverse into tho four ordinary elements, the prinoiplea of whoso composition were life and happiness, or concord and amity, but whose deoompoailion brought forth death and evil, or disoorS and hatred. Heraclitua held matter to be indifferent to any peculiar form, but as It became rarer or more dense, it took the appearance of fire, air, earth and water. Fire liow- ever, he believed to be the elementary principle out of which the others were evolved. This was also the belief of Lucretius. See book i. 1S3. etc. NOVUM ORGANUM 37 LXIV. The empiric school produces dogmas of a more deformed and monstrous nature than the sophistic or theo- retic school; not being founded in the light of common no- tions (which, however poor and superstitious, is yet in a manner universal, and of a general tendency), but in the confined obscurity of a few experiments. Hence this spe- cies of philosophy appears probable, and almost certain to those who are daily practiced in such experiments, and have thus corrupted their imagination, but incredible and futile to others. "We have a strong instance of this in the alche- mists and their dogmas; it would be difficult to find another in this age, unless perhaps in the philosophy of Grilbert." We could not, however, neglect to caution others against this school, because we already foresee and augur, that if men be hereafter induced by our exhortations to apply seri- ously to experiments (bidding farewell to the sophistic doc- trines), there will then be imminent danger from empirics, owing to the premature and forward haste of the under- standing, and its jumping or flying to generalities and the principles of things. We ought, therefore, already to meet the evil. LXY. The corruption of philosophy by the mixing of it up with superstition and theology, is of a much wider ex- tent, and is most injurious to it both as a whole and in parts. For the human understanding is no less exposed to the im- pressions of fancy, than to those of vulgar notions. The disputatious and sophistic school entraps the understand- ing, while the fanciful, bombastic,, and, as it were, poetical school, rather flatters it. There is a clear example of this '' It is thus the Vulcanista and Neptuniana have framed their opposite llteories in geology. Fhreuology ia a modern instance of hasty generaliza- tion. — Ed. 38 NOVUM ORGANUM among the Greeks, especially in Pythagoras, where, how- ever, the superstition is coarse and overcharged, but it is more dangerous and refined in Plato and his school. This evil is found also in some branches of other systems of phi- losophy, where it introduces abstracted forms, final and first causes, omitting frequently the intermediate and the like. Against it we must use the greatest caution ; for the apothfe- osis of error is the greatest evil of all, and when folly is worshipped, it is, as it were, a plague spot upon the under- standing. Yet some of the moderns have indulged this folly with such consummate inconsiderateness, that they have en- deavored to build a system of natural philosophy on the first chapter of Genesis, the book of Job, and other parts of Scripture; seeking thus the dead among the living." And this folly is the more to be prevented and restrained, be- cause not only fantastical philosophy, but heretical religion spring from the absurd mixture of matters divine and human. It is therefore most wise soberly to render unto faith the things that are faith's. LXYI. Having spoken of the vicious authority of the systems founded either on vulgar notions, or on a few ex- periments, or on superstition, we must now consider the faulty subjects for contemplation, especially in natural phi- losophy. The human understanding is perverted by observ- ing the power of mechanical arts, in which bodies are very materially changed by composition or separation, and is in- duced to suppose that something similar takes place in the universal nature of things. Hence the fiction of elements " In Scripture everything which concerns the passing interests of the body Is called dead; the only living knowledge having regard to the eternal interest of the soul. — Ed. NOWM OROANUM 39 and their co-operation in forming natural bodies." Again, when man reflects upon the entire liberty of nature, he meets with particular species of things, as animals, plants, min- erals, and is thence easily led to imagine that there exist iu nature certain primary forms which she strives to produce, and that all variation from them arises from some impedi- ment or error which she is exposed to in completing her work, or from the collision or metamorphosis of different species. The first hypothesis has produced the doctrine of elementary properties, the second that of occult properties and specific powers; and both lead to trifling courses of re- flection, in which the mind acquiesces, and is thus diverted from more important subjects. But physicians exercise a much more useful labor in the consideration of the second- ary qualities of things, and the operations of attraction, re- pulsion, attenuation, inspissation, dilatation, astringency, separation, maturation, and the like; and would do still more if they would not corrupt these proper observations by the two systems I have alluded to, of elementary quali- ties and specific powers, by which they either reduce the secondary to first qualities, and their subtile and immeas- '8 In mechanios and the general sciences, causes compound their effects, or in other words, it is generally possible to deduce d priori the consequence of introducing complex agencies into any experiment, by allowing for the efiect of each of the simple causes which enter into their composition. In chemistry and physiology a contrary law holds ; the causes which they embody generally uniting to form distinct substances, and to introduce unforeseen laws and com- binations. The deductive method here is consequently inapplicable, and we are forced back upon experiment. Bacon in the text is hardly consistent with himself, as he admits in the second book the doctrine, to which modem discovery points, of the reciprocal transmutation of the elements. What seemed poetic fiction in the theories o£ Pythagoras and Seneca, assiunes the appearance of scientific fact in the hands of Baron Caynard. — Ed. 4l» ^ NOVUM OBGANUM nrable composition, or at any rate neglect to advance by greater and more diligent observation to the third and fourth qualities, thus terminating their contemplation prematurely. Nor are these powers (or the like) to be in- vestigated only among the medicines for the human body, but also in all changes of other natural bodies. A greater evil arises from the contemplation and inves- tigation rather of the stationary principles of things from which, than of the active by which things themselves are created. For the former only serve for discussion, the lat- ter for practice. Nor is any value to be set on those com- mon differences of motion which are observed in the received system of natural philosophy, as generation, corruption, aug- mentation, diminution, alteration, and translation. For this is their meaning: if a body, unchanged in other respects, is moved from its place, this is translation; if the place and species be given, but the quantity changed, it is alteration; but if, from such a change, the mass and quantity of the body do not continue the same, this is the motion of aug- mentation and diminution; if the change be continued so as to vary the species and substance, and transfuse them to others, this is generation and corruption. All this is merely popular, and by no means penetrates into nature; and these are but the measures and bounds of motion, and not differ- ent species of it; they merely suggest how far, and not how or whence. For they exhibit neither the affections of bodies nor the process of their parts, but merely establish a divi- sion of that motion, which coarsely exhibits to the senses matter in its varied form. Even when they wish to point out something relative to the causes of motion, and to estab- lish a division of them, they most absurdly introduce nat- ural and violent motion, which is also a popular notion NOVUM ORGAKTUM 41 since every violent motion is also in fact natural, that is to say, the external efficient puts nature in action in a different manner to that which she had previously employed. But if, neglecting these, any one were, for instance, to observe that there is in bodies a tendency of adhesion, so as not to suffer the unity of nature to be completely separated or broken, and a vacuum^' to be formed, or that they have a tendency to return to their natural dimensions or tension, so that, if compressed or extended within or beyond it, they immediately strive to recover themselves, and resume their former volume and extent; or that they have a tendency to congregate into masses with similar bodies — the dense, for instance, toward the circumference of the earth, the thin and rare toward that of the heavens. These and the like are true physical genera of motions, but the others are clearly logical and scholastic, as appears plainly from a comparison of the two. Another considerable evil is, that men in their systems and contemplations bestow their labor upon the investiga- tion and discussion of the principles of things and the ex- treme limits of nature, although all utility and means of action consist in the intermediate objects. Hence men cease not to abstract nature till they arrive at potential and shapeless matter," and still persist in their dissection, till ^° Galileo had recently adopted the notion that nature abhorred a vacuum for an axiomatic principle, and it was not till Torricelli, his disciple, had given practical proof of the utility of Bacon's method, by the discovery of the barom- eter (1643) that this error, as also that expressed below, and believed by Bacon, concerning the homoeopathic tendencies of bodies, was destroyed. — Ed. *" Donee ad materiam potenUalem et informem ventmn fuerit. Nearly all the ancient philosophers admitted the existence of a certain primitive and shapeless matter as the substratum of things which the creative power had reduced to fixed proportions, and resolved into specific substances. The ex- 42 NOVUM OBUaNUM they arrive at atoms; and yet were all this true, it would be of little use to advance man's estate. LXVII. The understanding must also be cautioned against the intemperance of systems, so far as regards its giving or withholding its assent; for such intemperance ap- pears to fix and perpetuate idols, so as to leave no means of removing them. These excesses are of two kinds. The first is seen in those who decide hastily, and render the sciences positive and dictatorial. The other in those who have introduced scepticism, and vague unbounded inquiry. The former sub- dues, the latter enervates the understanding. The Aristo- telian philosophy, after destroying other systems (as the Ottomans" do their brethren) by its disputatious confuta- tions, decided upon everything, and Aristotle bimself then raises up questions at will, in order to settle them; so that everything should be certain and decided, a method now in use among his successors. The school of Plato introduced scepticism, first, as it were in joke and irony, from their dislike to Protagoras, Hippias," and others, who were ashamed of appearing not preasion potential matter refers to that substance forming the basis of the Peripatetic system, which virtually contained all the forms that it was in the power of the efficient cause to draw out of it. — Ed. *' An allusion to the humanity of the Sultans, who, in their earlier histories are represented as signalizing their accession to the throne by the destruction of their family, to remove the danger of rivalry and the terrors of civil war. — Ed. ^' The text is "in odium veterum sophistarum, Protagorse, Hippise, et reli- quorum." Those were called sophists, who, ostentationis aut questus causa pMlosophabantw. (Acad. Prior, ii. 22.) They had corrupted and degraded philosophy before Socrates. Protagoras of Abdera CA^Sijpo-). the most cele- brated, taught that man is the measure of all things, by which he meant not only that all which can be known is known only as it related to our faculties but also that apart from our faculties nothing can be known. The sceptics NOVUM ORQANUM 4» to doubt upon any subject. But the new academy dog- matized in their scepticism, and held it as their tenet. Although this method be more honest than arbitrary deci- sion (for its followers allege that they by no means con- found all inquiry, like Pyrrho and his disciples, but hold doctrines which they can follow as probable, though they cannot maintain them to be true), yet when the human mind has once despaired of discovering truth, everything begins to languish. Hence men turn aside into pleasant controversies and discussions, and into a sort of wandering over subjects rather than sustain any rigorous investigation. But as we observed at first, we are not to deny the authority of the human senses and understanding, although weak, but rather to furnish them with assistance. LXYIII. We have now treated of each kind of idols, and their qualities, all of which must be abjured and re- nounced with firm and solemn resolution, and the under- standing must be completely freed and cleared of them, so that the access to the kingdom of man, which is founded on the sciences, may resemble that to the kingdom of heaven, where no admission is conceded except to children. LXIX. Vicious demonstrations are the muniments and support of idols, and those which we possess in logic, merely subject and enslave the world to human thoughts, and thoughts to words. But demonstrations are in some man- ner themselves systems of philosophy and science ; for such as they are, and accordingly as they are regularly or im- equally held that knowledge was probable only as It related to our faculties, but they stopped there, and did not, like the sophist, dogmatize about the un- known. The works of Protagoras were condemned for their impiety, and pablidy burned by the aediles of Athens, who appear to have discharged the office of common hangmen to the literary blasphemers of their day. — Ed. 44 NOVUM OBQANUM properly established, such will be the resulting systems of philosophy and contemplation. But those which we employ in the whole process leading from the senses and things to axioms and conclusions, are fallacious and incom- petent. This process is fourfold, and the errors are in equal number. In the first place the impressions of the senses are erroneous, for they fail and deceive us. We must supply defects by substitutions, and fallacies by their correction. Secondly, notions are improperly abstracted from the senses, and indeterminate and confused when they ought to be the reverse. Thirdly, the induction that is employed is im- proper, for it determines the principles of sciences by simple enumeration," without adopting exclusions and resolutions, or just separations of nature. Lastly, The usual method of discovery and proof, by first establishing the most general propositions, then applying and proving the intermediate axioms according to them, is the parent of error and the calamity of every science. But we will treat more fully '' Bacon is hardly correct in implying that the enumeraiionem per simplicem was the only light in which the ancients looked upon induction, as they appear to have regarded it as only one, and that the least important, of its species. Aristotle expressly considers induction in a perfect or dialectic sense, and in an imperfect or rhetorical sense. Thus if a genus (g), contains four species (a, b, 0, d), the syllogism would lead us to infer, that what is true of G, is true of any one of Ihe four. But perfect induction would reason, that what we can prove of A, B, o, D, separately, we may properly state as true of G, the whole genus. This is evidently a formal argument as demonstrative as the syl- logism. In necessary matters, however, legitimate induction may claim a wider province, and infer of the whole genus what is only apparent in a part of the species. Such are those inductive inferences which concern the laws of nature the immutability of forms, by which Bacon strove to erect his new system of philosophy. The Stagyrite, however, looked upon enumerationem per simpU- eem, without any regard to the nature of the matter, or to the completeness of the species, with as much reprehensive caution as Bacon, and guarded his readers against it as the source of innumerable errors. — Ed. NOVUM ORGANUM 45 of that which we now slightly touch upon, when we come to lay down the true way of interpreting nature, after hav- ing gone through the above expiatory process and purifica- tion of the mind. LXX. But experience is by far the best demonstration, provided it adhere to the experiment actually made, for if that experiment be transferred to other subjects apparently similar, unless with proper and methodical caution it be- comes fallacious. The present method of experiment is blind and stupid; hence men wandering and roaming with- out any determined course, and consulting mere chance, are hurried about to various points, and advance but little — at one time they are happy, at another their attention is distracted, and they always find that they want something further. Men generally make their experiments carelessly, and as it were in sport, making some little variation in a known experiment, and then if they fail they become dis- gusted and give up the attempt; nay, if they set to work more seriously, steadily, and assiduously, yet they waste all their time on probing some solitary matter, as Gilbert on the magnet, and the alchemists on gold. But such con- duct shows their method to be no less unskilful than mean; for nobody can successfully investigate the nature of any object by considering that object alone; the inquiry must be more generally extended. Even when men build any science and theory upon ex- periment, yet they almost always turn with premature and hasty zeal to practice, not merely on account of the advan- tage and benefit to be derived from it, but in order to seize upon some security in a new undertaking of their not em- ploying the remainder of their labor unprofitably, and by making themselves conspicuous, to acquire a greater name 46 NOVUM OBOANUM for their pnrsuit. Hence, like Atalanta, they leave the course to pick up the golden- apgle, interrupting their speed, and giving up the victory. jBut in the true course of experiment, and in extending it to new e£fects, we should imitate the Divine foresight and order; for God on the first day only created light, and assigned a whole day to that work without creating any material substance thereon. In like manner we must first, by every kind of experiment, elicit the discovery of causes and true axioms, and seek for experiments which may afford light rather than profit. Axioms, when rightly investigated and established, pre- pare us not for a limited but abundant practice, and bring in their train whole troops of effects. But we will treat hereafter of the ways of experience, which are not less beset and interrupted than those of judgment; having spoken at present of common experience only as a bad species of demonstration, the order of our subject now re- quires some mention of those external signs of the weakness in practice of the received systems of philosophy and con- templation" which we referred to above, and of the causes of a circumstance at first sight so wonderful and incredible. For the knowledge of these external signs prepares the way for assent, and the explanation of the causes removes the wonder; and these two circumstances are of material use in extirpating more easily and gently the idols from the understanding. LXXI. The sciences we possess have been principally derived from the Greeks; for the addition of the Boman Arabic, or more modern writers, are but few and of small importance, and such as they are, are founded on the basis " See Ax. 1x1. toward the end. This subject extends to Ax. lixviii ADFITM ORGANUM 47 of Greet invention. But the wisdom of the Greeks was professional and disputatious, and thus most adverse to the investigation of truth. The name, therefore, of sophists, which the contemptuous spirit of those who deemed them- selves philosophers, rejected and transferred to the rhetori- cians — Gorgias," Protagoras, Hippias, Pol us — might well suit the whole tribe, such as Plato, Aristotle, Zeno, Epicurus, Theophrastus, and their successors — Chrysippus, Carneades, and the rest. There was only this difference between them — the former were mercenary vagabonds, travelling about to different states, making a show of their wisdom, and re- quiring pay; the latter more dignified and noble, in pos- session of fixed habitations, opening schools, and teaching philosophy gratuitously. Both, however (though differing in other respects), were professorial, and reduced every sub- ject to controversy, establishing and defending certain sects and dogmas of philosophy, so that their doctrines were nearly (what Dionysius not unaptly objected to Plato) the talk of idle old men to ignorant youths. But the more ancient Greeks, as Empedocles, Anaxagoras, Leucippus, De- mocritas, Parmenides, Heraclitus, Xenophanes, Philolaus, and the rest" (for I omit Pythagoras as being superstitious). "■ Gorgiaa of Leontium went to Athens in 424 B.C. He and Polus were disciples of Empedocles, whom we have already noticed (Aphorism 63), where he sustained the three famous propositions, that nothing exists, that nothing can be known, and that it is out of the power of man to transmit or communicate intel- ligence. He is reckoned one of the earliest writers on the art of rhetoric, and for that reason, Plato called his elegant dialogue on that subject after his name. ^ Chrysippus, a stoic philosopher of Soli in Oilicia, Campeatria, born in 280, died in the 143d Olympiad, 208 B.C. He was equally distinguished for natural abilities and industry, seldom sufEering a day to elapse without writing 500 lines. He wrote several hundred volumes, of which three hundred were on logical subjects ; but in all, borrowed largely from others. He was very fond of the sorites in argument, which is hence called by Persius the heap of Chry- 48 NOVUM ORGANUM did not (that we are aware) open schools, but betook them- selves to the investigation of truth with greater silence- and with more severity and simplicity, that is, with less affecta- tion and ostentation. Hence in our opinion they acted more advisedly, however their works may have been eclipsed in course of time by those lighter productions which better correspond with and please the apprehensions and passions of the vulgar; for time, like a river," bears down to us that aippua. He waa called the Column of the Portico, a name given to the Stoical School from Zeno, its founder, who had given his lessons under the portico. Cameades, born about 215, died in 130. He attached himself to Chrysip- pus, and sustained with eclat the scepticism of the academy. The Athenians sent him with Critolaus and Diogenes as ambassador to Rome, where he at- tracted the attention of his new auditory by the subtilty of his reasoning, and the fluency and vehemence of his language. Before Galba and Cato the Censor, he harangued with great variety of thought and copiousness of diction in praiso of justice. The next day, to establish his doctrine of the uncertainty of human knowledge, he undertook to refute all his arguments. He maintained with the New Academy, that the senses, the imagination, and the understanding fre- quently deceive us, and therefore cannot be infallible judges of truth, but that from the impressions produced on the mind by means of the senses, we infer appearances of truth or probabilities. Nevertheless, with respect to the conduct of life, Carneadea held that probable opinions are a sufficient guide. Xenophanes, a Greek philosopher, of Colophon, born in 556, the founder of the Eleatic school, which owes its fame principally to Parmenides. Wild in his opinions about astronomy, he supposed that the stars were extinguished every morning, and rekindled at night ; that eclipses were occasioned by the tempo- rary extinction of the sun, and that there were several suns for the convenience of the different climates of the earth. Yet this man held the chair of philoso- phy at Athens for seventy years. Philolaus, a Pythagorean philosopher of Crotona, B.C. 374. He first sup- ported the diurnal n»tion of the earth round its axis, and its annual motion round the sun. Cicero (Acad. iv. 39) has ascribed this opinion to the Syracu- san philosopher Nicetaa, and likewise to Plato. Prom this passage, it is moat probable that Copernicus got the idea of the system he afterward established. Bacon, in the Advancement of Human Learning, charges Gilbert with restoring the doctrines of Philolaus, because he ventured to support the Copemican theory. — Ed. " Bacon is equally conspicuous for the uae and abuse of analogical illustra- tions. The levity, aa Stuan Mill very properly observes, by which substances NOVUM OSGANUM 49 wtich is light and inflated, and sinks that which is heavy and solid. Nor were even these more ancient philosophers free from the national defect, but inclined too much to the ambition and vanity of forming a sect, and captivating public opinion, and we must despair of any inquiry after truth when it condescends to such trifles. Nor must we omit the opinion, or rather prophecy, of an Egyptian priest with regard to the Greeks, that they would forever remain children, without any antiquity of knowledge or knowledge of antiquity ; for they certainly have this in common with children, that they are prone to talking, and incapable of generation, their wisdom being loquacious and unproduc- tive of effects. Hence the external signs derived from the origin and birthplace of our present philosophy are not favorable. LXXII. Nor are those much better which can be de- duced from the character of the time and age, than the former from that of the country and nation ; for in that age the knowledge both of time and of the world was confined and meagre, which is one of the worst evils for those who rely entirely on experience— they had not a thousand years of history worthy of that name, but mere fables and ancient traditions; they were acquainted with but a small portion of the regions and countries of the world, for they indis- criminately called all nations situated far toward the north Scythians, all those to the west Celts; they knew nothing of Africa but the nearest part of Ethiopia, or of Asia be- float on a stream, and the levity which is synonymous with worthlessneas, have nothing beside the name in common ; and to show how little value there is in the figure, we need only change the word into buoyancy, to turn the semblancf* of Bacon's argument against himself — Ed. 50 NOVUM OBQANUM yond the Ganges, and had not even heard any sure and clear tradition of the regions of the New World. Besides, a vast number of climates and zones, in which innumerable nations live and breathe, were pronounced by them to be uninhabitable; nay, the travels of Democritus, Plato, and Pythagoras, which were not extensive, but rather mere excursions from home, were considered as something vast. But in our times many parts of the New World, and every extremity of the Old, are well known, and the mass of experiments has been infinitely increased; wherefore, if ex- ternal signs were to be taken from the time of the nativity or procreation (as in astrology), nothing extraordinary could be predicted of these early systems of philosophy. LXXIII. Of all signs there is none more certain or worthy than that of the fruits produced, for the fruits and effects are the sureties and vouchers, as it were, for the truth of philosophy. Now, from the systems of the Greeks, and their subordinate divisions in particular branches of the sciences during so long a period, scarcely one single experi- ment can be culled that has a tendency to elevate or assist mankind, and can be fairly set down to the speculations and doctrines of their philosophy. Celsus candidly and wisely confesses as much, when he observes that experi- ments were first discovered in medicine, and that men after- ward built their philosophical systems upon them, and searched for and assigned causes, instead of the inverse method of discovering and deriving experiments from phi- losophy and the knowledge of causes; it is not, therefore wonderful that the Egyptians (who bestowed divinity and sacred honors on the authors of new inventions) should have consecrated more images of brutes than of men for the brutes by their natural instinct made many discoveries NOVUM OBOANUlt 61 while men derived but few from discusaion and the con- clusions of reason. The industry of the alchemists has produced some effect, by chance, however, and casualty, or from varying their ex- periments (as mechanics also do), and not from any regular art or theory, the theory they have imagined rather tending to disturb than to assist experiment. Those, too, who have occupied themselves with natural magic (as they term it) have made but few discoveries, and those of small import, and bordering on imposture; for which reason, in the same manner as we are cautioned by religion to show our faith by our works, we may very properly apply the principle to philosophy, and judge of it by its works, accounting that to be futile which is unproductive, and still more so if, instead of grapes and olives, it yield but the thistle and thorns of dispute and contention. LXXIV. Other signs may be selected from the increase and progress of particular systems of philosophy and the sciences ; for those which are founded on nature grow and increase, while those which are founded on opinion change and increase not. If, therefore, the theories we have men- tioned were not like plants, torn up by the roots, but grew in the womb of nature, and were nourished by her, that which for the last two thousand years has taken place would never have happened, namely, that the sciences still con- tinue in their beaten track, and nearly stationary, without having received any important increase, nay, having, on the contrary, rather bloomed under the hands of their first author, and then faded away. But we see that the case is reversed in the mechanical arts, which are founded on na- ture and the light of experience, for they (as long as they are popular) seem full of life, and uninterruptedly thrive and BCIENOE— Vol. 23 — 3 62 NOVUM OBOANUM grow, being at first rude, then convenient, lastly polished, and perpetually improved. LXXV. There is yet another sign (if such it may be termed, being rather an evidence, and one of the strongest nature), namely, the actual confession of those very authori- ties whom men now follow; for even they who decide on things so daringly, yet at times, when they reflect, betake themselves to complaints about the subtilty of nature, the obscurity of things, and the weakness of man's wit. If they would merely do this, they might perhaps deter those who are of a timid disposition from further inquiry, but would excite and stimulate those of a more active and confident turn to further advances. They are not, however, satisfied with confessing so much of themselves, but consider every- thing which has been either unknown or unattempted by themselves or their teachers, as beyond the limits of possi- bility, and thus, with most consummate pride and envy, convert the defects of their own discoveries into a calumny on nature and a source of despair to every one else. Hence - arose the New Academy, which openly professed scepti- cism," and consigned mankind to eternal darkness; hence the notion that forms, or the true differences of things (which are in fact the laws of simple action), are beyond man's *> We have before observed, that the New Academy did not profess skep- ticism, but the oKaTdAiji^ia, or incomprehensibility of the absolute essences of things. Even modern physicists are not wanting, to assert with this school . that the utmost knowledge we can obtain is relative, and necessarily short of absolute certainty. It is not without an appearance of truth that these philoso- phers maintain that our ideas and perceptions do not express the nature of the things which they represent, but only the effects of the peculiar organs by which they are conveyed to the understanding, so that were these organs changed, we should have different conceptions of their nature. That constitu- tion of air which is dark to man is luminous to bats and owls. NOVUM OBGANUM 53 reach, and cannot possibly be discovered; hence those no- tions in the active and operative branches, that the heat of the sun and of fire are totally different, so as to prevent men from supposing that they can elicit or form, by means of fire, anything similar to the operations of nature; and again, that composition only is the work of man and mixture of nature, so as to prevent men from expecting the generation or transformation of natural bodies by art. Men will, there- fore, easily allow themselves to be persuaded by this sign not to engage their fortunes and labor in speculations, which are not only desperate, but actually devoted to des- peration. LXXVI. Nor should we omit the sign afforded by the great dissension formerly prevalent among philosophers, and the variety of schools, which sufSciently show that the way was not well prepared that leads from the senses to the understanding, since the same groundwork of philosophy (namely, the nature of things), was torn and divided into such widely differing and multifarious errors. And al- though in these days the dissensions and differences of opinions with regard to first principles and entire systems are nearly extinct," yet there remain innumerable questions and controversies with regard to particular branches of phi- losophy. So that it is manifest that there is nothing sure or sound either in the systems themselves or in the methods of demonstration." LXXVII. With regard to the supposition that there is a general unanimity as to the philosophy of Aristotle, beeaUse 2' Owing to the universal prevalence of Aristotelism. *> It must be remembered, that when Bacon wrote, algebra was in its in&ncy, and the doctrine of units and infinitesimals undiscovered. 64 NOVUM OKdAJSUM the other systems of the ancients ceased and became obso- lete on its promulgation, and nothing better has been since discovered ; whence it appears that it is so well determined and founded, as to have united the suffrages of both ages; we will observe — 1st. That the notion of other ancient sys- tems having ceased after the publication of the works of Aristotle is false, for the works of the ancient philosophers subsisted long after that event, even to the time of Cicero, and the subsequent ages. But at a later period, when human learning had, as it were, been wrecked in the inun- dation of barbarians into the Eoman empire, then the sys- tems of Aristotle and Plato were preserved in the waves of ages, like planks of a lighter and less solid nature. 2d. The notion of unanimity, on a clear inspection, is found to be fallacious. For true unanimity is that which proceeds from a free judgment, arriving at the same conclusion, after an investigation of the fact. Now, by far the greater number of those who have assented to the philosophy of Aristotle, have bound themselves down to it from prejudice and the authority of others, so that it is rather obsequiousness and concurrence than unanimity. But even if it were real and extensive unanimity, so far from being esteemed a true and solid confirmation, it should even lead to a violent pre- sumption to the contrary. Eor there is no worse augury in intellectual matters than that derived from unanimity, with the exception of divinity and politics, where suffrages are allowed to decide. For nothing pleases the multitude, un- less it strike the imagination or bind down the. understand- ing, as we have observed above, with the shackles of vulgar notions. Hence we may well transfer Phocion's remark from morals to the intellect: "That men should immediately examine what error or fault they have committed, when the NOVUM OBOANUM 55 multitude concurs with, and applauds them."" This then is one of the most unfavorable signs. All the signs, there- fore, of the truth and soundness of the received systems of philosophy and the sciences are unpropitious, whether taken from their origin, their fruits, their progress, the confessions of their authors, or from imanimity. LXXVIII. We now come to the causes of errors," and of such perseverance in them for ages. These are suffi- ciently numerous and powerful to remove all wonder, that what we now oflEer should have so long been concealed from, and have escaped the notice of mankind, and to render it more worthy of astonishment, that it should even now have entered any one's mind, or become the subject of his thoughts; and that it should have done so, we consider rather the gift of fortune than of any extraordinary talent, and as the offspring of time rather than wit. But, in the first place, the number of ages is reduced to very narrow limits, on a proper consideration of the matter. For out of twenty-five" centuries, with which the memory and learn- *' Because the vulgar make up the overwhehning majority in such decisions, and generally allow their judgments to be swayed by passion or prejudice. ^ See end of Axiom Izi. The subject extends to Axiom xc. ^ If we adopt the statement of Herodotus, who places the Homeric era 400 years back from his time, Homer lived about 900 years before Christ. On add- 'ing this number to the sixteen centuries of the Christian era which had elapsed up to Bacon's time, we get the twenty-five centuries he mentions. The Homerio epoch is the furthest point in antiquity from which Bacon could reckon with any degree of certainty. Hesiod, if he were not contemporary, immediately preceded him. The epoch of Greek philosophy may be included between Thales and Plato, that is, from the 35th to the 88th Olympiad; that of the Soman, between Terence and Plmy. The modem revolution, in which Bacon is one of the centrstl figures, took its rise from the time of Dante and Petrarch, who lived at the commencement of the fourteenth century ; and to which, on account of the invention of printing, and the luiversal spread of literature, which has ren- 66 NOVUM OBGANUm ing of man are conversant, scarcely six can be set apart and selected as fertile in science and favorable to its progress. For there are deserts and wastes in times as in countries, and we can only reckon up three revolutions and epochs of philosophy. 1. The Greek. 2. The Eoman. 3. Our own, that is the philosophy of the western nations of Europe: and scarcely two centuries can with justice be assigned to each. The intermediate ages of the world were unfortunate both in the quantity and richness of the sciences produced. Nor need we mention the Arabs, or the scholastic philoso- phy, which, in those ages, ground down the sciences by their numerous treatises, more than they increased their weight. The first cause, then, of such insignificant prog- ress in the sciences, is rightly referred to the small propor- tion of time which has been favorable thereto. LXXIX. A second cause offers itself, which is certainly of the greatest importance; namely, that in those very ages in which men's wit and literature flourished considerably, or even moderately, but a small part of their industry was bestowed on natural philosophy, the great mother of the sciences. For every art and science torn from this root may, perhaps, be polished, and put into a serviceable shape, but can admit of little growth. It is well known, that after the Christian religion had been acknowledged, and arrived at maturity, by far the best wits were busied upon theology, where the highest rewards offered themselves, and every species of assistance was abundantly supplied, and the study of which was the principal occupation of the western Euro- pean nations during the third epoch; the rather because dered a second destruction of learning impossible, it is difficult to foresee any other end than the extinction of the race of man. — Ed. NOVUM OBGANUM 57 literature flourished about the very time when controver- siea concerning religion first began to bud forth. 2. In the preceding ages, during the second epoch (that of the Eo- mans), philosophical meditation and labor was chiefly occu- pied and wasted in moral philosophy (the theology of the heathens) : besides, the greatest minds in these times applied themselves to civil affairs, on account of the magnitude of the Eoman empire, which required the labor of many. 3. The age during which natural philosophy appeared principally to flourish among the Greeks, was but a short period, since in the more ancient times the seven sages (with the exception of Thales), applied themselves to moral philosophy and politics, and at a later period, after Socrates had brought down philosophy from heaven to earth, moral philosophy became more prevalent, and diverted men's attention from natural. Nay, the very period during which physical inquiries flourished, was corrupted and rendered useless by contradictions, and the ambition of new opinions. Since, therefore, during these three epochs, natural philoso- phy has been materially neglected or impeded, it is not at all surprising that men should have made but little progress in it, seeing they were attending to an entirely different matter. LXXX. Add to this that natural philosophy, especially of late, has seldom gained exclusive possession of an indi- vidual free from all other pursuits, even among those who have applied themselves to it, unless there may be an ex- ample or two of some monk studying in his cell, or some nobleman in his villa." She has rather been made a pas- sage and bridge to other pursuits. ** The aUusion is evidently to Boger Bacon and R6u6 Descartes. — BaL 58 NOVUM OBOANUM Thus has this great mother of the sciences been degraded most unworthily to the situation of a handmaid, and made to wait upon medicine or mathematical operations, and to wash the immature minds of youth, and imbue them with a first dye, that they may afterward be more ready to receive and retain another. In the meantime, let no one expect any great progress in the sciences (especially their operative part), unless natural philosophy be applied to particular sciences, and particular sciences again referred back to natural phi- losophy. For want of this, astronomy, optics, music, many mechanical arts, medicine itself, and (what perhaps is more wonderful), moral and political philosophy, and the logical sciences have no depth, but only glide over the surface and variety of things; because these sciences, -when they have been once partitioned out and established, are no longer nourished by natural philosophy, which would have im- parted fresh vigor and growth to them from the sources and genuine contemplation of motion, rays, sounds, texture, and conformation of bodies, and the affections and capacity of the understanding. But we can little wonder that the sci- ences grow not when separated from their roots. LXXXI. There is another powerful and great cause of the little advancement of the sciences, which is this; it is impossible to advance properly in the course when the goal is not properly fixed. But the real and legitimate goal of the sciences is the endowment of human life with new in- ventions and riches. The great crowd of teachers know nothing of this, but consist of dictatorial hirelings; unless it so happen that some artisan of an acute genius, and am- bitious of fame, gives up his time to a new discovery, which is generally attended with a loss of property. The major- ity, so far from proposing to themselves the augmentation NOVUM OBOANUM 59 of the mass of arts and sciences, make no other use of an in- quiry into the mass already before them, than is afforded by the conversion of it to some use in their lectures, or to gain, or to the acquirement of a name, and the like. But if one out of the multitude be found, who courts science from real zeal, and on his own account, even he will be seen rather to follow contemplation, and the variety of theories, than a severe and strict investigation of truth. Again, if there even be an unusually strict investigator of truth, yet will he propose to himself, as the test of truth, the satisfaction of his mind and understanding, as to the causes of things long since known, and not such a test as to lead to some new earnest of effects, and a new light in axioms.' If, there- fore, no one have laid down the real end of science, we can- not wonder that there should be error in points subordinate to that end. LXXXII. But, in like manner, as the end and goal of science is ill defined, so, even were the case otherwise, men have chosen an erroneous and impassable direction. For it is sufficient to astonish any reflecting mind, that nobody should have oared or wished to open and complete a way for the understanding, setting off from the senses, and regular, well-conducted experiment; but that everything has been abandoned either to the mists of tradition, the whirl and con- fusion of argument, or the waves and mazes of chance, and desultory, ill-combined experiment. Kow, let any one but consider soberly and diligently the nature of the path men have been accustomed to pursue in the investigation and discovery of any matter, and he will doubtless first observe the rude and inartificial manner of discovery most familiar to mankind: which is no other than this. When any one prepares himself for discovery, he first inquires and obtains ^ NOVUM OBGANUM a full account of all that has been said on the subject by others, then adds his own reflections, and stirs up and, as it were, invokes his own spirit, after much mental labor, to disclose its oracles. All which is a method without founda- tion, and merely turns on opinion. Another, perhaps, calls in logic to assist him in discov- ery, which bears only a nominal relation to his purpose. For the discoveries of logic are not discoveries of principles and leading axioms, but only of what appears to accord with them.*' And when men become curious and importunate, and give trouble, interrupting her about her proofs, and the discovery of principles or first axioms, she puts them off with her usual answer, referring them to faith, and ordering them to swear allegiance to each art in its own department. There remains but mere experience, which, when it offers itself, is called chance; when it is sought after, experiment." But this kind of experience is nothing but a loose fagot; and mere groping in the dark, as men at night try all means of discovering the right road, while it would be better and more prudent either to wait for day, or procure a light, and then proceed. On the contrary, the real order of experience begins by setting up a light, and then shows the road by it, commencing with a regulated and digested, not a misplaced and vague course of experiment, and thence deducing axioms, and from those axioms new experiments: for not even the Divine Word proceeded to operate on the general mass of things without due order. Let men, therefore, cease to wonder if the whole course « Prom the abuse of the scholastics, who mistook the