COMMUNICATION FROM BOAED OF STATE TAX COMMISSIONERS TO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. (IJnrnpU ICatu ^rl|nol IGibrarg COMMUNICATION ' Cornell University Ubrary KFM4671.A83 FROM BOARD OF STATE TAI COMMISSIONERS. TO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TRA.NSMITTING DATA RELATIVE TO OPERATION OF TAX LAWS. FEBRUARY 23, 1911. ORDERED PRINTED FOR USE OF THE HOUSE. LANSING, MICHIGAN WYNKOOP HALLENBBCK CRAWFORD CO., STATE PRINTERS 1911 o i w n ,n «i (Tk Lansing, February 22, 1911. To the House of Eepresentatives of tlie State of Michigan : The Board of State Tax Commissioners begs leave to acknowledge the receipt of the following resolution from your honorable body: "Wheretis, There is considerable agitation for a revision of the state tax system as evidenced by the large number of measures introduced proposing amendments to the general tax laws; and "Whereas, The Board of State Tax Commissioners, having had many years experience in matters pertaining to the tax system of the ^tate, particularly in regard to the workings of the general tax laws; there- fore be it "Resolved, That the Board of State Tax Commissioners be and is hereby requested to transmit to the House, without delay and not later than March first, a communication relative to the workings of the present tax laws, setting forth in detail what changes, if any, in the judgment of the Commission should be made in said laws." In compliance therewith, detailed data and other information are at- tached to and form a part of this communication, upon which the fol- lowing recommendations are based and respectfully submitted : Fii'st. That the ad valorem system of taxation now in force be re- tained ; Second. That the powers of the board to initiate examinations, re- views and re-assessments be clearly defined; Third. That the board be authorized to employ such assistants, ex- pert and otherwise, as may be necessary to secure a cash valuation of all mining and other properties of the state, for the purpose of taxation ; Fourth. That the valuations of all public utility corporations as- sessable under the general tax laws, such as water-power companies, electric-light companies, gas companies, power and heat cothpanies, in- terurban and street railway companies be determined each year by the Board of State Tax Commissioners, and that such valuation be certi- flled by said board to the various assessing officers as the tentative assessment of such properties for the current year; Fifth.. That section 154 of Act No. 281 of the Public Acts of 1905, be amended by inserting in line 2, after the word "any," the words "real and personal," and in line 10, after the word "description," the words "and kind," thus clearly bringing personal property within the provi- sions of this section. Respectfully, Jas. H. Thompson, RoBBBT H. Shields^ Geo. B. Horton^ Board of State Tax Commissioners. The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924024688701 The detailed work of the boai'd for the past four years will be found in that part of its report for the years 1907 and 1908, hereto attached, together with the advance sheets of the report for the yeaj's 1909 and 1910, which report is now in the hands of the state printer. Many reasons why the recommendations herewith submitted, in re- sponse to your resolution, should be adopted are discussed in the ad- vance sheets of the board's report for 1909 and 1910, which are a part of this communication ; but the board begs leave to submit some addi- tional information bearing upon its workings under the tax law as it existed from 1899 to 1904 and under conditions which have existed since 1905. The law providing for and prescribing the duties of the Board of State Tax Commissioners relative to the assessment of property in the state, became operative during the year 1900. Previous to that time local assessing ofQcers had entire control in fixing the valuation of in- dividual assessments. _The increase in the assessed valuations of real estate in the state for thirteen years immediately preceding the year 1900 was 1112,738,002, and of personal property |2,187,419, a total in- crease of only 1115,609,421. The increase in assessed valuation of real estate in the state from 1900 to 1904, inclusive, was |356,379,498, and of personal property for the same period |205,400,675, a total increase of |561,780,173. This board had during that period the authority to employ such help as was necessary', together with the power to initiate reviews and re-assess- ments of all properties which in its judgment required such action. The legislature of 1905 limited the number of employes of the board to ten, exclusive of the secretary and chief clerk, and restricted the power of review to- those cases in which a written complaint was filed by a resident tax payer. This was amended in 1909 by striking out the word "resident." The increase in assessed valuation of real estate fn the state from 1905 to 1910, both inclusive, was $167,702,881, and in personal property $43,542,097, a total increase in six years of |191,244,978 as compared with an increase in the five years preceding 1905 of $561,780,173. A comparison of the increase in assessments of real and personal properties in the ten 'largest cities of the state for the period of five years immediately succeeding the year 1899, and of tiie other property in the counties where such cities are situated exclusive of said cities is shown in the following table : Eeal estate in 9 largest cities, except Detroit, increase • from 1899 to 1904 154,996,556 Real estate in 9 largest cities, except Detroit, increase per cent from, 1899 to 1904 70.4% Eeal estate, city of Detroit, increase from 1899 to 1904.. $23,779,460 Per cent of increase for above 18.9% c Real estate in counties, containing 9 cities above .referred to, except cities, for same period 136,136,473 -Real estate per cent of increase for above 36.9% Personal property increase in above 9 cities from 1899 to 1904 141,780,773 Personal propertj' increase per cent in same cities from 1899 to 1904 22.4% Personal Property increase in Detroit from 1899 to 1904 . . . $36,246,010 Personal property increase per cent in Deti*oit from 1899 to 1904 '. 79.4% The increase in assessed valuations in the same districts, as shown above, from 1905 to 1910 inclusive, or since the amendment of 1905, limiting the number of assistants to be empiloyed to ten, and restrict- ing the power to review assessments, is as follows: Real estate in 9 largest cities, except Detroit, increase from 1904 to 1910 .- 133,918,072 Real estate in 9 largest cities, except Detroit, per cent in- crease from 1904 to 1910 25.5% Real estate, city of Detroit, increase from 1905 to 1910 |59,493,390 Real estate, increase per cent for above 29.7% Real estate in counties, containing 9 largest cities, except same, increase from 1904 to 1910 |2,661,010 Per cent of increase for above 1.98% Personal propertv increase 9 largest cities, except Detroit, from 1904 to 1910 ' $9,637,801 Personal property increase per cent for above ,. . . 16.2% Personal property increase, Detroit from 1904 to 1910 $27,673,920 Personal property increase per cent for above, 1904 to 1910 16.2% Personal property increase in counties containing 9 larg- est cities mentioned, except cities, 1904 to 1910 $782,047 Personal property increase per cent of above, from 1904 to 1910 2.6% Personal property increase in counties containing 9 largest cities above mentioned, except cities, 1899 to 1904 .... $18,015,282 Personal property increase per cent for above, same period 186% The assessment of Wayne county, outside of Detroit, and the assess- ment of the city of Detroit for the year 1904, has not been considered in these companies, owing to the annexation of property adjoining the city between the assessments of 1904 and 1905. The valuation of mining companies for purposes of taxation, being a subject of much discussion, the board herewith presents a comparison of the assessment of copper, iron and coal mining properties for the years 1904 and 1910. Total 'assessment of copper mining properties for 1904 . . $66,119,349 Total assessment of copper mining properties for 1910 . . 79,053,367 Increase $12,984,018 Increase of per cent for abo^f* io k<%,' These companies have in addition to properties assessed in counties where mines are located large holdings of timber lands and other prop- erties, subject to taxation in different counties of this state, and in other states. The board has no data at the present time showing the valua- tion of such holdings. Inciease valuation, real estate, copper mining counties, except mines, 1904 to 1910 |3,603,623 Increase per cent on above, 1904 to 1910 16.2% Increase valuation, personal, copper mining counties, ex- cept mine^, 1904 to 1910 $1,622,591 Increase per cent on above, 1904 to 1910 , 24.7% Total increase valuation, real and personal, copper mining counties, except mines, 1904 to 1910 |4,978,466 Total increase per cent for above 18 .7% Total assessment of iron mining properties, 1904 ..... . . . . |22,413,504 Total assessment of- iron mining properties, 1910 25,833,442 Increase $3,419,938 Total increase of per cent for above 15.59% Increase valuation, real estate, iron mining counties, ex- cept mines, 1904 to 1910 |4,234,402 Increase per cent for above 21 . 6% Decreased valuation, personal, iron mining counties, except mines, 1904 to 1910 |439,937 Decrease per cent for above 1.4% Total increase valuation, real and personal, iron mining counties, except mines,. 1904 to 1910 |3,794,465 Total increase per cent for above 14.3% Total increased valuation of all properties in the Upper Peninsula, except mines, 1904 to 1910 . . . ■ $7,471,285 Total increase per cent of above 7 . 7% Total assessment of coal mitiing properties for 1904 $602,041 Total assessment of coal mining properties for 1910 " 680,410 Increase $78,410 Total increase per cent of above 13% The assessed valuation of the coal companies form so small a pro- portion of the total assessed valuation in the counties where located, that no "comparisons have been made between these and other classes of property. The lack of complete and authentic data relative to the assessment of mining property in the year 1899 has made it impossible to give reliable comparisons of the assessment of this class of property for the five year period from 1899 to 1904. The following is an extract from the last report of the Board of State Tax Commissioners, now in course of publication: LAWS GOVERNING THE BOARD. The powers and duties of this board are defined and set forth in sec- tions 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 152, 153 and 154 of Act No. 281 of the Public Acts of 1905, as amended, which are as follows: Section 145. It shall be the duty of the Governor on the flrat day of November, nineteen hundred flVe, to appoint three resident freeholders of this State, who shall be duly qualified electors thereof, and who shall hereafter constitute a Board of State Tax Commissioners, with powers and duties as prescribed under this act, one of whom so appointed shall hold oiBce until the first Wednesday in January, 1909, one of whom so ap- pointed shall hold office until the first Wednesday in January, 1911, and one of whom so appointed shall hold oflSce until the first Wednesday in January, 1913, and until their successors shall have been appointed and shall have qualified. Thereafter the successors of each mehiber of said Board of State Tax Commissioners shall be appointed by the Governor by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and shall hold offlce for the term of six years and until their successors shall have been ap- pointed and qualified. The persons who now constitute the Board of State Tax Commissioners under appointments heretofore made shall continue to hold their office until the fitrst day of November, 1905, and until their successors shall have been appointed and qualified. All ap- pointments which are provided to be made" by the Governor under this section of this act, except in the first instance, shall be made while the legislature is in session, and not at any other time, except in cases where a vacancy in offlce shall occur otherwise than by the expiration of the term of offlce of any member of said board. In case a vacancy in the office occurs otherwise than by expiration of the term, the Gov- ernor shall have power to appoint to fill such vacancy at any time, and the person so appointed shall hold office until the next meeting of the Legislature after such appointment, and no longer. Section 146. Said board shall elect a secretary at a salary not to exceed two thousand dollars per annum, and a chief clerk at a' salary not to exceed one thousand five hundred dollars per annum. The per- sons so elected shall hold their offlce during the pleasure of said board. The secretary shall keep a record of all the proceedings of said board which records, with all other papers or proceedings of said boSrd, shall be a part of the records of the Auditor General's office, and of which the Auditor General shall be the lawful custodian. The secretary shall de- vote all his time to the duties of his office, and when said board is not in session shall perform such duties as may have been assigned to him by said board. The chief clerk shall devote all his time to the duties of his offlce and shall perform such duties as may be assigned to him by said board. 9 Section 147. The members of said board, and the secretary and chief clerk thereof, shall take and subscribe the constitutional oath of ofiSce to be filed with the Secretary of State. The members of said board shall receive an annual salary of two thousand five hundred dollars ; and they shall also receive their necessar\' expenses in the performance of their duties, both to be audited and allowed by the Board of State Audi- tors, and paid monthly by the State. Treasurer out of the general fund. Section 148. All sessions of said board shall be held at the office of said board at the capitol, to be furnished by the Board of State Au- ditors. The said Board and the members thereof, shall have access to all books, papers, documents, statements and accounts on file or of rec- ord in any of the departments of State, subject to the rules and regula- tions of the respective departments relative to the care of the public records. It shall have like access to all books, papers, documents, state- ments and accounts on file or of record in counties, townships and mu- nicipalities. Said board shall have the right to subpoena witnesses upon a subpoena signed by the president of said board, and attested by the secretary thereof, directed to such witnesses, and which subpoena may be served by any person authorized to serve subpoenas from courts of record in this State, and the attendance of witnesses may be compelled by at- tachment to be issued by any Circuit Court in the State upon proper showing that such witness has been properly subpoenaed and has refused to obey such subpoena. The person serving such subpoena shall receive, the same compensation now allowed to sheriffs and other oflflcers for serving subpoenas. Said board shall have power to examine witnesses under oath, said oath to be administered by any member of said board or by the secretary thereof. Said board shall have the right to examine books, papers or accounts of any corporation, firm or individual owning property liable to assessment for taxes, general or specific, under the laws of this State, and any officer or stockholder of any such corporation, any member of any such firm, or any person or persons who shall refuse to permit said inspection, or neglect or fail to appear before said board in response to its subpoena, or testify, as provided for in this section, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or by imprisonment in the State prison for a period not exceeding two years, or by both such fine and imprisonment, in the discretion of the court. Section 149. Said board shall hold regular meetings on the fiTst Tuesday of March, June, July, August, September and October in each year, and may hold adjourned sessions as may be deemed necessary by it for the proper performance of the duties devolving upon said board. The chairman may call special sessions of the board whenever he may deem it advisable so to do, and shall call such special sessions upon the written request of two members. Section 150. First, it shall be the duty of said board to receive all complaints as to property liable to taxation that has not been assessed, or that has been fraudulently or improperly assessed, and to investigate the same, and to take such proceedings as will correct the irregularity complained of, if any is found to exist; Second, To see that each county in the State be visited by at least one member of the board as often as once in each year, to the end that all 10 complaints concerning assessments may be heard; that information con- cerning such assessments may be collected; Third, To require from any oflScer in this State, on forms prescribed by said Board of State Tax Commissioners, such annual or other reports as shall enable said Board of State Tax Commissioners to ascertain the assessed values and equalized values of all property listed for taxation throughout the State under this act; the amount of taxes assessed, col- lected and returned and such other matter as the board may require, to the end that it may have complete statistical information as to the prac- tical operation of this act. Fourth, It shall be the duty of said Board of Tax Commissioners each year to ascertain and determine the actual cash value of the taxable property of each county in this State and to be present at each meeting of the State Board of Equalizatiou and to present to said board the result of such inquiry and determination for the purpose of assisting said board in the performance of the duties imposed upon it by law. Sec. 152. After the various assessment rolls required to be made under this act shall have been passed upon by the several boards of review, and prior to the meeting of the board of supervisors in October of each year, the said several assessment rolls Mn the state shall be sub- ject to inspection by said Board of State Tax Commissioners, or by any member thereof; and in case it shall appear, or be made to appear, by written complaint of any taxpayer to said board that property subject to taxation has been omitted from said roll, or individual assessments have not been made in compliance with law, the said board may issue an order, directing the assessor whose assessment or failure to assess is complained against, to appear with his assessment roll at a time and place to be stated in said order, said time to be not less than seven days from the date of the issuance of said order, and the place to be at the ofBce of the board of supervisors at the county seat, or at such other place in said county, in which said roll was made, as said board shall deem most convenient for the hearing herein provided. A notice of the time and place that said assessor is ordered to appear with said roll, together with the statements of the person or persons whose property or whose assessments are to be considered, shall be pub^ lished in a newspaper published at the county seat of said county, if there be .one, if not, in some paper printed in said county, if there be any, at least five days before the time at which said assessor is required to appear; and, where practicable, personal notice by mail shall be given to such persons prior to said hearing. A copy of said order shall also be served upon the supervisor or assessing officer in whose posses- sion said roll shall be, at least three days before he is required to appear with said roll. The said board, or any member thereof, .shall appear at the time and place mentioned in said order, and the super- visor or assessing officer upon whom said notice shall have been served shall appear also with said assessment roll. The said board or any mem- ber thereof, as the case may be, shall then and there hear and determine as to the proper assessment of all property and persons men- tioned in said notice, and all persons affected or liable to be affected by review of said assessments thus provided for may appear and be heard at said hearing. In case said board or the member thereof who shall act in said review, shall detei-mine that the assessments so re- 11 viewed are not assessed according to law, he or they shall, in a column provided for that purjjose, place opposite said property the true and law- ful assessment of the same. As to the property not upon the assess- ment roll, the said board or member thereof acting in said review, shall place the same upon said assessment roll by proper description and shall place thereafter in the proper, column the true cash value of the same. In case of review under the provisions of this section, the said board or member thereof acting in said review, shall certify under his hand officially and spread upon said roll a certificate of the day and date on which said assessment roll was reviewed by him, and the changes by him made therein. For appearing with said roll as required herein the supervisor or assessing officer shall receive the same per diem as is received by him while in attendance at the meeting of the board of supervisors, to be presented to and paid by the proper offi- cers of the municipality of which he is the assessing officer in the man- ner as his other compensation is paid. The action of said board or member done as provided in this act shall be final. Note. — The amendment to Section 1S2 permits any taxpayer to file a written complaint with the Board of State Tax Commissioners acting as a Board of Review. AMENDMENTS. Some amendments were also made relative to the assessment of the general properties of the State; they are: ACT NO. 309, PUBLIC ACTS OF 1909. Sec. 7. The following real property shall be' exempt from taxation.: First. All public property belonging to the United States; Second. All public property belonging to the State of Michigan, ex- cept licensed homestead lands, part paid lands held under certificates and lands purchased at tax sales and still held by the state; Third. Lands owned by any county, township, city, village or school district and buildings thereon, used for public purposes; Fourth. Such real estate as shall be owned and occupied by library, benevolent, charitable, educational and scientific institutions incorpo- rated under the laws of this state, with the buildings and other property thereon, while occupied by them solely for the purposes for which they were incorporated: Provided, That such exemption shall not apply to fraternal or secret societies, but all charitable homes of such societies shall be exempt; Fifth. All houses of public worship with the land on which they stand, the furniture therein and all rights in the pews, and also any parsonage owned by any religious society of this State and occupied as such; Sixth. All lands used exclusively as burial grounds and the rights of burial therein, and the tombs and monuments therein while reserved and in use for that purpose : Provided, That the stock of any corporation owning such burial grounds shall not be exempt; Seventh. The real and personal property of persons who, in the opinion of the supervisor and board of review, by reason of poverty, are unable to contribute toward the public charges; Eighth. The real property of corporations exempt under the laws of 12, this state, by reason of paying specific taxes in lieu of all other taxes for the support of the state : Provided, That track, right of way, depot grounds and buildings, machine shops, rolling stock and all other prop- erty necessarily used in operating any railroad in this state belonging to any railroad company, shall henceforth remain exempt from taxation for any purpose, except that the same shall be subject to special assess- ments for local improvements in cities and villages, and all lands owned or claimed by any such railroad company not adjoining the track of such company shall be subject to all taxes; Ninth. Property owned exclusively by the state agricultural society or any county or district agricultural society, and used by any such so- ciety exclusively for fair purposes; Tenth. All land dedicated to the public and actually used as a park, and any monument ground or any ai-mory belonging to any military organization, and not used for gain or any other purposes; Eleventh. All real estate used as a homestead not exceeding in value one thousand two hundred dollars of any soldier or sailor of the federal government who served three months or more during the civil war, and in all real estate used as a homestead not exceeding in value one thou- sand two hundred dollars of any widow of such soldier or sailor: Provided, That any soldier or sailor, or the widow of any such sailor or soldier desiring to accept the benefits named in this section as to the ex- emption from taxation, shall make and file with th§ supervisor or assess- ing officer an affidavit, stating under oath that he was a soldier or sailor of the federal government during the civil war for a period of not less than three months, and in case it be the widow of a soldier or sailor making such application, said -affidavit must state that she is the widow of a soldier or sailor of the federal government at the present time, who served not less than three months as such soldier or sailor during the civil war. The said affidavit shall be sworn to before said supervisor, assessing officer, or any officer authorized to administer oaths and then filed by the said officer in his office, and turned over to his successor, where the same shall be open to inspection. Any person making a false affidavit" in any particular, for the purpose of exemption from taxation shall be deemed to be guilty of the crime of perjury, and punished accordingly: Provided, however. That this exemption shall not operate to i-elieve from the payment of taxes any of the persons hereinbefore enumerated who are the owners of taxable property of greater value than twelve hundred dollars. Note. — Section 7 is changed by repealing subdivision 11 as it now stands and making an entir new subdivision 11 wliicli exemnts under certain conditions real estate used as a homestead and owned by any soldier, sailor, or their widows, of the Civil War. Sec. 9. The following personal property shall be exempt from taxa- tion, to-wit: First. The personal property of benevolent, charitable, educational and scientific institutions incorporated under the laws of this state : Pro- vided, That such exemptions shall not apply to secret or fraternal so- cieties, but the personal property of all charitable homes of such societies sihall be exempt; Second. Of all library associations, circulating libraries, libraries of reference and reading rooms owned or supported by the public and not used for gain; 13 Third. Of all posts of the grand army of the republic, sons of vet- erans' unions, and of the women's relief corjis connected therewith, of all young men's Christian associations, and of women's Christian temper- ance union associations, young people's Christian unions, and other similar associations; Fourth. Pensions receivable from the United States; Fifth. So much of the debts due or to become due as shall equal the amount of bona fide and unconditional debts by the person owing ; • Sixth. The property of Indians who are not citizens; Seventh. The librarj', family pictures, school books, one sewing ma- chine used and owned by each individual or family, and wearing ap- parel of every individual; Eighth. Household furniture, provisions and fuel to the value of five hundred dollars to each household: Provided, No person paying board shall be deemed a householder; Ninth. The working tools of any mechanic not to exceed in value the sum of one hundred dollars; Tenth. Of all fire engines and other implements used in extinguishing fii'es, owned or used by any organized or independent fire company; Eleventh. All mules, horaes', and cattle, not over, one year old, all sheep and swine not over six months old, and all domesticated birds ; Twelfth. Personal property owned and used by any householder in connection with his business of the value of two hundred dollars. Note. — The onljf change in section'9 occurs in subdivision 3 ol that section which'omits the words union veterans' unions." ACT/NO. 88, PUBLIC ACTS 1909. Section 1. All bonds hereafter issued by any county, township, city, village or school district within the State of Michigan pursuant to statute are hereby exempted from all taxation. Section 2. All acts and parts of acts inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed. ACT NO. 84, PUBLIC ACTS OF 1909. Section 64. Armories erected by counties, cities, private corporations, corporations composed of national guard companies or private individu- als, and used by organizations of the permanent organized militia, shall be exempt from all taxes, ordinary or extraordinary, whether levied by the State or by counties or municipalities, the same as other State prop- erty is exempt. Bonds, mortgages and other certificates of indebtedness made and issued by any municipality, organization or private individual for the purpose of erecting armories under this act, shall not be assessed or taxed as personal property for any purpose, when held by any person within the State of Michigan. 14 ADVISORY WORK OF THE BOARD. The last report of this board dwelt at considerable length on the dif- ferent phases of advisory work being carried on, for the assistance of local assessing officers, in regard to certain classes of personal property subject to taxation within the State. This included mortgage credits owne'd in Michigan but recorded in other States, mortgage credits both owned and recorded in this State, personal property of decedents or those under guardianship, evidence of which is to be found in the rec- ords of the probate courts, and the value of all State and National Bank Stock and trust companies orgabized and doing business within the State ; also such infonnation as could be obtained relating to the differ- ent classes of vessel property having a situs for taxation in Michigan. Tables were submitted showing the results of this kind of advisory work. The Board does not deem it necessary at this time to repeat the de- tails of such work, but would report that the advisory work of the kind therein detailed hers been carried on during the last two years, in the same manner, and the fullest information possible to collect has been furnished to each assessing officer previous to the second Monday of April of each year. CREDIT TAXATION. The question of credit taxation is one which still presents a problem of interest in securing an equitable distribution of taxes to be borne by the assessable property of the state, and the probability that a discussion of the subject may come before the legislature of 1911 suggests that the board present in a condensed form the results of certain investigations made and reported in detail in its last report. . First : The matter of all credit assessments within the State was made the subject of careful inquiry with the following results : Assessed value of all mortgage credits |48,144,334 Assessed value of Bank deposits in state, not including those in private banks , 14,413,682 Assessed value of other credits 31,672,314 Total of credits assessed |94,230,330 Interest bearing bank deposits above were used in this compilation, and they represented only 8.06 per cent of total amount of such deposits. "Other credits" includes all those not found in the two items men tioned, and this board knows of no method by which the cash value of such credits liable to taxation can be obtained, except through the truth- fulness of the individual taxpayer and the efficiency of the assessing officers in the state. Another inquiry directed toward the subject of mortgage credit prop- erty in the state showed that during the year 1907, there were recorded in the offices of the various registers of deeds in Michigan : 15 Real estate mortgages owned by residents of the state and liable to taxation under the present laws 117,884,322 Real estate mortgages owned by non-residents of the State. 7,843,872 Real estate mortgages owned by Banks 14,859,657 Real estate mortgages, owned by Trust Oo.'s 56,865,138 Real estate mortgages owned by Insurance Co.'s 918,700 Real estate mortgages owned by Building & Loan Asso- ciations 2,942,502 Real estate mortgages not assessable by reason of exemp- tions under the law 543,000 Total $101,857,691 Many trust mortgages do not represent the correct amount of debt in existence when same are filed, as they are frequently given to secure moneys to be loaned at some future date or dates. Hence, the Board is unable to state that the item "Trust Mortgages" shows definitely the amount of money actually loaned at the date of record. The amount of taxes actually paid under the present law on Mortgage credits for the year 1907 was .|746,923.95, this being equivalent to a spe- cific tax of $.0073 on the face value of every mortgage recorded in the State for that year. If the ti-ust mortgages and those not assessable are eliminated the result is f .0168 for each dollar. These facts should be carefully considered as to their bearing on the average rate, the amount of revenue obtainable, and the practical oper- ation of any other system of taxation, in the event a change in the man- ner of assessing this class of property, is contemplated by the coming legislature. 16 REVIEWS. Reviews were held during the years 1909 and 1910 as follows: Marquette, July 12, 1909, upon complaint of the Keweenaw Land As- sociation that their personal property in said city was unlawfully as- sessed. The question as to the jurisdiction of the Board to review the as- sessment roll at that date was raised and, after a partial hearing, the complaint was withdrawn. Grand Haven, September 22, 1909. Review was held upon complaint made by the Grand Rapids, Grand Haven and Muskegon Railway Com- pany that personal property to the amount of $60,000 was assessed against the Grand River Toll Bridge Company, a corporation which had ceased to exist, and the title of whose property had passed to the com- plainant, and had become a part of its Interurban railway system. Complainant further set up that said bridge property being in- cluded in its mileage, which was assessed at a certain valuation per mile, no additional valuation should be placed upon, its personal property by the Board. The Board, after due consideration of the proposition submitted, eliminated the assessment of $60,000 against the Toll Bridge Company and added $40,000 to the assessment of complainant in the first ward of the city of Grand Haven where the bridge and other per- sonal property of complaining company was situated. Bay City, September 21, 1.909. On complaint of the Bay Cfity Trac- tion & Electric Company that its property was assessed in excess of cash value by the local Board of Review, this Board, after taking evi- dence and careful consideration of the matter contained in said com- plaint, reduced the assessed valuation of complainant from $550,000 to $325,000. Bay Oity, October 1, 3909. On Complaint of the Sage Land & Im- provement Co. that the valuation fixed by the local Board of Review of $91,550 on certain descriptions of its real estate was in excess of cash value. After listening to evidence produced and due consideration of the facts submitted, the board placed the cash value of the property un- der consideration at $61,150. Kalkaska, October 7, 1909. On complaint of Mr. Robert Eastman that the assessment of the township of Excelsior in Kalkaska County was irregular and unlawful by reason of under-valuation and discrimina- tions made by the Supervisor and Board of Review. The township con- sists of 22,-376 acres of land including nearly eighteen sections of timber lands. The complaint in this case covered the entire taxable property in the township. Bach description of property was given a personal in- spection under the direction of the Board and after listening to the testi- mony produced at the review and due consideration of all facts pre- sented the cash valuation of the township was fixed at $602,726, an in- crease of .f 296, 140 from the original as.se.«sment by local ofiflcers. Cheboygan, October 8, 1909. On complaint of H. N. Pike's Sons, tax- payers in Burt Township and Marion P. Pickands, a taxpayer, in the fourth ward of the city of Cheboygan. The complaint in the case of Burt township alleged favoritism, under-valuation and discrimination 17 i as between different classes of property throughout the entire township, which consists of four fractional townships around the shores of Burt and Mullet lakes, the acreage is 22,402 acres and about the shores of the lakes mentioned there is over |100,000 worth of resort property. A preliminary examination showed that the allegations in the complaint were substantially correct and that a complete reassessment of the town- ship was necessary to correct the errors that existed. Every description of real estate liable to taxation was examined and valued. Testimony of taxpayers was taken on the day of review and the Board in its final determination fixed the assessment of the Township at $282,- 005. The amount returned by the local officers being $159,570. The complaint of Marion R. Pickands alleged that the assessment of property owned by her in the fourth ward of the city of Cheboygan was much in excess of similar property in the same ward and more than cash value; after an inspection of this property and consideration of testi- mony offered, the Board reduced the assessment from |3,000 to $2,200. 1910. St. Johns, June 22, 1910, on complaint of Thomas H. Clark a taxpayer of St. Johns Oity, alleging illegal assessments on specific descriptions of real estate in said city. The Board, after inspection of the properties described in the complaint and taking testimony relative to the value of the same fixed the aggregate cash values of said properties at $33,000. The supervisors and local board of reviews' valuation was $20,100. Traverse City, June 29, 1910, on complaint filed with the Board alleg- ing discriminations, or under-valuations in the assessment of all proper- ties within the city for the present year. Preliminary examinations dis- closed these complaints to be well founded. The assessing districts of this city comprise five wards with an area of four and one-half sec- tions or 2880 acres. The population of the city is about twelve thou- sand. An examination and appraisal was made of each description of real estate within the city. Sworn statements procured from each owner of personal property liable to taxation, and a personal examination and appraisal was made of all tangible personal property. Upon the two days of the review many owners of taxable property appeared and gave testimony and after due consideration of the evidence presented and the appraisals that had been made the Board fixed and determined the cash value of all the property in the city to be $7,777,558. The assessed value as determined by the local officers was $4,667,469; this shows an increased valuation of $3,110,089. ^ Midland, Mich., Sept. '16, 19] 0. On complaint of the Dow Chemical Company, and other taypayers of the City of Midland, a reassessment of the city was ordered, and the same method of inspection and appraisal employed as at Traverse City. The Board, after considering the evidence offered on the day of review and the appraisals made, fixed the cash value of the city at $1,528,785, an increase from the local assessment of $633,060. Northport, Mich., Sept. 27, 1910. On complaint of David H. Scott that the assessment of the township of Leelanau in Leelanau County was irregular and unlawful by reason of intentional and undervaluation of all properties in the township subject to taxation, and further that said 3 18 properties were .not equitably assessed, the allegations in the complaint were, upon investigation, found to be so far true that a reassessment of the township Was ordered. This township consists of four fractional towns. The eastern boundary is Grand Traverse Bay, the northern and part of the western boundary being lake Michigan. It contains 37,614 acres of assessable property, and has over |250,000 of what is known as resort property. The village of Northport, with a population of iive hundred, is also within the town- ship, also eight plats or sub-divisions of summer resort property. The examinations and appraisal of this township included personal inspection of every description of real estate, and all tangible personal property. Such taxpayers as desired to be heard were present a.t the review and gave testimony relative to the value of their respective properties. The Board, after consideration of the evidence offered and the appraisals made, fixed the cash value of the township at |1,024,385, an increase of 1685,940 froni the amount fixed by the local assessing officers. Charlevoix, September 29, 1910, on complaint of R. N. Gibbons, of the township of St. James-, in Charlevoix county, that discrimination had been made in the assessment of properties in that township, and that the Board of Eeview had held no meeting in said township, for the year 1910 as required by law. A reassessment of all property in the township was ordered. This township consists of the northern part of Big Beaver Island and eight smaller islands adjacent thereto. The total acreage is 6,680 acres. The village of St. James is also situated in the township. The same methods of examination and appraisal were employed as in Leelanau township. Testimony of taxpayers was taken on the day of review and after careful consideration of all facts presented and ap- praisals made the cash value of this township was fixed at $149,820. The assessed value fixed by the supervisor was |127,290. Hancock, October 1, 193 0. This review was held for the purpose of considering facts which had come to the knowledge of the Board tending to show that a large amount of personal property in the shape of mort- gage credits had been omitted from the assessment rolls, in the four wards of the city of Hancock, Houghton county. Commissioner Shields conducted the review. After listening to all the evidence presented and due consideration of the same, it was determined that there should be added to the said assessment rolls in each of said wards, amounts aggre- gating 141,480, and the additions were so made. Mt. Pleasant, October 3, 1910. On complaint of Louis P. Riley that certain personal property in the township of Union, Isabella county, had been greatly undervalued by the local assessing officers for the year 1910. On the day of the review testimony of the complainant and the per- son against whose property complaint had been made were talfen, and after consideration of the facts presented. Commissioner Thompson, the acting member of the Board, fixed the actual value of the property under consideration at |12,000. The assessed valuation of local assessing offi- cers was |600. Kalkaska, October 4, 1910, on complaint of the Prosecuting Attorney of Kalkaska County relative to the assessment of property in the town- ship of Excelsior in said County. This township had been reassessed and the valuation fixed on review by the Board in 1909, at |602,726. The 19 complainant alleged that the Supervisor and Board of Eeview in the township had materially and intentionally reduced its assessed value below that determined by the Board in the year previous, and that in so doing they had wilfully discriminated against certain classes of property. A preliminary examination showing these allegations to be correct. A re- examination of the townships was made previous to the day of review, and after listening to the testimony, given by taxpayers, and the report oi said re-examination on the day of hearing, the Board fixed the cash value of the township at |580,565. The assessed valuation, of the same by the local officers was .f420,800. The decrease in yalue of |22,161 from the amount fixed by the board In 1909 was due to the fact that standing timber had been cut and removed from the township between the assess- ment period of 1909 and 1910. Public hearings for the purpose of reviewing assessment rolls, has con- stituted only a part of the duties performed by the Board in the matter of supervising the work of the assessing officers of the State during the past two years. Numerous complaints regarding the assessment of prop- erties in different parts of the State, ranging from small holdings of in- dividual taxpayers to the entire assessments of townships and cities have been investigated by the members of the Board and the Secretary. In many cases a settlement of the matters complained of was made without the necessity of a public hearing. During the present year complaints were received from three town- ships and one city, which, upon investigation, were found to warrant a general reassessment, but owing to the late date on which they were re- ceived, it was found impossible to complete the work prior to the second Monday in October with the limited number of assistants available for this kind of work. The collection of data for the use of the State Board of Equalization, in the city of Jackson, during, the early months of 1910, indicated_ that the assessment of that city was at a low valuation and very irregular. The assessing officers of this city were interviewed and urged to correct these errors in the assessment for the present year. When the local Board of Review met, it became evident that the desired results had not been obtained. An application was made by the Jackson Board of Review to this . Board for assistance in reviewing the assessment rolls of the city. The Board assigned for this purpose the examiner who _had collected the data above mentioned, and as a result, most of the irregularities were cor- rected and an increase of .f4,000,000 added to the assessed valuation of the city. Complaint was also made to the Board of the irregularities in the assessment of bank stock in the county of St. Clair. The complaint alleged that considerable amounts of this class of property was assessed in the townshijjs adjacent to the City of Port Huron that should proper- ly have appeared upon the rolls of that city. After a consultation by members of the Board and the Secretary with the assessing officers and owners of the stock, this matter was adjusted in compliance with the law without a formal review. Extended examinations were made in the early months of 1909, of timber lands, wild lands, villages, and farm property in the township 30 of Duncan, Houghton county, whicb consists of nearly Ave surveyed towns or 112,655 acres. No review was held in this township as the local Board of Review at its session so equalized the valuations that the com- plaint on which the investigations were made was withdrawn. The township of Baraga in Baraga county was also quite thoroughly examined in the summer of 1909. This township consists of 107,448 acres and contains the village of Baraga with a population of about eleven hundred. The complaint in this case was made by a corporation which alleged that illegal and intentional discriminations had been made against its property by the assessing officer of the to'^^nship. A review was not ordered in titis case for the reason that the results •of the investigation made did not sustain the facts alleged in the com- plaint. 21 THE AVERAGE KATE. The Board is convinced that a situation of great gravity confronts the people of Michigan at the present time regarding the problem of "equal taxation." An equitable equilibrium must be established between the taxation of the different classes of property. Under our system of an average rate of taxation measuring the share of the public burden to be borne by certain specified properties and all the different rates, de- pending on the necessities of eighty-three counties and over seventeen hundred taxation districts within this state, measuring the share to be borne by all other properties, the utmost vigilance and integrity, and best business capacity must be exercised to prevent inequality and in- justice in levying such taxes as are necessary for a proper administration of State and other municipal affairs. The most important step in this direction is to secure a proper basis on which to levy the different sums that go to make up the aggregate taxes for state, county, school and municipal uses. The law clearly de- fines what this basis shall be, namely, "Cash value" of all property liable to taxation. This method is the best for two reasons. First, because it is the law, second, because it is the simplest as no percentage of cash value can be determined unless the cash value is first ascertained. We might add an- other reason, and that is : No other method is just or equitable under our present system. To illustrate: In a certain township it is necessary to raise for the public needs |500. If the property to be taxed is worth $100,000 and assessed at cash value the rate is five mills and the owner of $1,000 worth of taxable property, would be taxed |5. If the assessment is made at 50 per cent of cash value, then the tax roll would show a rate of ten mills on the dollar. The man who in the first instance was assessed . at $1,000 would now be assessed at $500 and his tax would be $5, the same as before. An adjoining township needs to raise $600. The value of it is $60,000 and it is so assessed. The rate would then be ten mills on the dollar and the tax would be $10 on property worth $1,000. If the property in the township is assessed at 40 per cent of the cash value or $24,000 the tax rate would be twenty-five mills on the dollar, the property worth $1,000 assessed at $400 and the tax would be $10, just the same. It is evident then, that, as to the local needs of these two townships the amount of tax paid by the individual property owners is not changed whether the assessment is at cash value or any percentage thereof. This is because the tax to be raised is a fixed, determined amount before any rate is struck. Let us suppose that there is certain property situated in both these townships that must be assessed by a board of assessors and a tax levied according to the average rate of taxation of the townships, which is de- termined by adding together the assessed valuation, and taxes of the two townships and dividing the sum of the taxes by the sum of the assess- ments. In the instance of a cash value assessment the dividend "will be ilfiO.OOO, the divisor or the taxes $1,100 and the average rate $.00675. 22 The value of the property to be assessed by a board of assessors is 000 and is so assessed. ' The tax would 'be $10,000 multiplied by the average rate |.00G75 or $67.50. If we use the assessment of one township at 50 per cent or $50,000 and the other at 40 per cent or $24,000 the divisor would be |7,000, the dividend or taxes remaining unchanged. As the amount to be raised, is |1,100 dividing as before the average rate in this instance is $.01486 and the tax levied by the board of assessors on the $10,000 which they have determined to be the \'alue of that property, would be $148.60 instead of $67.50 an increase of $81.10 taxes on property which has not changed in value. Neither is there any change in the amount of taxes in the two townships, being $1,100 in each case; and this additional burden is P'U,t on the $10,000 for the simple and sole reason that in the second assessment of the two townships the assessing officers had failed to as- sess at "cash value." We trust the great importance of this phase of our taxation question •will be apparent to the assessing officers of the state and to the Legis- lature, and that the one will cooperate with the board in their capacity as supervisors and assessors, and the other by making such amendments to the present law as will enable us to perform the- duties of our office with a thoroughness that will remove any doubt as tO' the pennanency of what has already been achieved in the cause of equal taxation. RECOMMENDATIONS. The largely increasing number of complaints filed with the board each year concerning alleged irregnilar and illegal assessments of property by local assessors demands a vast amount of detail work in their investi- gation. In a large majority of cases facts are disclosed which justify a general review of all the property situated within the assessing district where the property complained of is situated. The term during which the corrective powers of the board over assess- ment rolls is in force extends from about the first of July to the second Monday in October of each year, or a little over three months. What is called a general review means an entire re-assessment of the township or city under investigation, and this re-assessment includes an actual per- sonal inspection of every description of real estate liable to taxation within the district; also the same inspection of all taxable personal property so situated. Apply this kind of an investigation to from fifty to one hundred assessment districts in the state each year, varying from $300,000 to $20,000,000 in value, and some idea can be formed of the labor that confronts the board during the time allowed yearly for cor- rective work. Added to this is the duty of preparing once in five years a report of the cash value of all taxable properties in the state, (not under the jurisdiction of the state board of assessors) for the use of the state board of equalization. In addition to the duties above mentioned is the work of preparing each year for the use of assessing officers in the state information con- cerning certain classes of personal property which has been referred to in another part of this report. The statute at pi-esent provides that the board shall be authorized to employ not to exceed ten clerks exclusive of the secretary and chief clerk; a force entirely inadequate to carry out, even in the most perfunc- 23 tory manner, the duties imposed upon it. These duties are of such nature that the service required is more or less elastic. The time within which data is being prepared for the state board of equalization rccjuires an additional force not necessary in other years in order that the most complete and reliable information possible can be laid before said board. The classes of property in this state are so gi-eatly diversified that with- out extensive and careful investigation it is almost impossible to arrive at such a valuation in each county as the law contemplates. We would, therefore, recommend that the law be so amended as to give the board full power to employ such assistance from time to time as in its judgment is necessaiw to carry out the spirit and letter of the statute prescribing the duties referred to. AUTHORITY TO INITIATE REVIEWS. In a former report the Board called attention to the injustice of that portion of the law which confines its jurisdiction to hold reviews to those cases in which complaints were filed by resident taxpayers of the assessing district in which the property sought to be reviewed was located. The Legislature of 1909 amended section 152 of the general tax law, which gives the board its corrective powers, by striking out the words "residing in the district" and that portion of ,the statute which directs when the board shall have jurisdiction to review, reads as follows: "And in case it shall appear, or be made to appear, by written complaint of any taxpayer to said board that property subject to taxation, has been omitted from said roll or individual assessments have not been made in compliance with law, the said Board may issue an order," etc., etc. This amendment clearly removed the constitutional objection which existed in the former statute, which limited the right of appeal to this Board to a certain class of property owners: namely, those residing in the township or city where their property was situated and left the non- resident owner without such right of appeal. The added experience of two years since the last report was written leads the Board to the conclusion that the right to initiate reviews upon investigation made by its members, or under its authority, should be clearly conferred, for the reason that complaints are frequently made from a single township or city within a county, which, upon investiga- tion, demand a review of all the property situated within that district, and the Board is compelled to act and reassess at cash value such prop- erty ; at the same time having knowledge that the other townships or cities in the same county are not equitably assessed ; but, with no proper comp'laints from such districts, the Board is without the authority to bring all propertv in the countv to the same basis. The Attorney General of the' State on April 19, 1910, filed with the board a written opinion relative to the powers of the board in the matter of calling reviews, which is herewith submitted: "April 19, 1910. Hon. William H. Hoyt, President of State Tax Commissioners, Lansing, Michigan : My Dear Sir — I am in receipt of your request for an opinion upon the right of the Board of State Tax Commissioners to review generally upon its own initiative under the powers conferred on it by Act 281, "--' '-- * -" " ^ " 1909. That part of Section 24 152 of Act 8 of the Laws of 1909 which, is material to your inqtiiry is as follows: "After the various assessment rolls required to be made under this act shall have been passed upon by the several boards of review, and prior to the meeting of the board of supervisors in October of each year the said several assessment rolls in the state shall be subject to inspection by said board of state tax commissioners, or by any member thereof and in case it shall appear, or be made to appear, by written complaint of any taxpayer to said board that property subject to taxation has been omitted from said roll, or individual assessment have not been made in compliance with law, the said board may issue an order," etc. The question as to whether the Tax Commission has the power under this statute to proceed on its own initiative to review assessment rolls must turn upon the construction of the language "in case it shall appear or be made to appear, by written complaint of any taxpayer." If the phrase "in case it shall appear" as well as the phrase "be made to ap- pear" be qualified by the words "by written complaint of any taxpayer," you would not have power to proceed upon your own initiative to re- view assessments. If, on the other hand, the phrase "be made to appear" is alone qualified by the words "by written complaint of any taxpayer," you would have the power to review assessments upon your own in- itiative. If the qualifying words apply to both phrases, you have as a result two phrases meaning substantially the same thing and the statute would in effect read in this wise, "in. case it shall appear by written complaint of any taxpayer, or in case it be made tO' appear by the writ- ten complaint of any taxpayer." This construction would amount to a repetition and if either phrase were eliminated the remaining one would express as much as both. One of the two phrases vrould be surplusage and we must not assume that the Legislature so intended it. If we construe the qualifiying words to apply solely to the last phrase, then both phrases are consistent and each means -something different from, the other. This construction also is justified by precedent and the rules of statutory construction. Sutherland's Statutory Ck)nstruction, Section 420, lays down the following rule to guide in such cases: "Eelative and qualifying words and phrases, grammatically and legally, where no contrary intention appears, refer solely to the last antecedent." In Quinn v. Lowell Electric Co., 140 Mass. 106, a statute, was con- strued which provided for the adoption of a statute by cities and town ' " at a legal meeting of the city council, or the inhabitants of the town called for that purp<)se." It was held that "called for that purpose" did not apply to a city council. In Dearborn v. Brookline, 97 Mass. 466, a statute was construed which provided: "That any town or city might appropriate money for suitable build- ings or rooms, and for the foundation of a library, a sum not exceeding one dollar for each of the ratabte pools in the year next preceding, and, annually thereafter, a sum not exceeding fifty cents for each of its ratable polls." It was held that the power to make the subsequent appropriations with its limitation was for the s ame nhdect as Jilie_ flrst._jand ji3id_Ti mi- apply to the power to appropria 25 Where the by-laws of a society provided flirst for an annual meeting for the election of ofScei's and then for a monthly meeting on a specified day "at half-past seven o'clock p. m.," it was held that the phrase specifying the hour of meeting had reference only to the monthly meet- ing. State V. Conklin, 34 Wis. 21. Applying the rule laid down in these cases that qualifying words refer solely to the last antecedent, to the language under consideration, we have a construction which is consistent and which enables your board to review assessments upon your own initiative under the power given you in the first phrase, and under the power given you in the second phrase you must act when your attention is challenged to under- valuations or omissions by a taxpayer in a particular district. I am of the opinion that this statute should be construed as giving you the power to review assessments upon your own initiative and as making it obligatory upon you to act when your attention is challenged by a taxpayer of any particular district to undervaluations and omis- sions of property from the roll in that district. Yours very truly, JOHN E. BIRD, B-bu-o Attorney General." Under this opinion the right to initiate reviews by the Board seems to have been conferred and in a few instances has been exercised; but the great importance of this question leads the Board to recommend that the Legislature take such action as will clearhf indicate what powers it shall exiercise in relation to this portion of its duties. TERM OP MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. The larger part of the duties imposed on the State Board of Assessors consists of the assessment and levying of taxes upon the property of Railroad Companies, sleeping car companies, car loaning companies, telegraph, telephone and express companies. There are at the present time on the assessment roW of the Board one hundred railroad, sixty-six car loaning, one sleeping car, two hundred and two telegraph and telephone and seven express companies, each of which is required to make an annual report to the Board showing the condition and value of its physical property also statement of its finan- cial status on the .30th of June. An examination of such report is es- sential in arriving at the assessable value of the properties above men- tioned. It can be readily seen that this involves much time and labor to arrive at the desired result. The term of office of each member is for six years dating from the first Wednesday in January of the rear in which the'appointment is made. The assesment roll for the class of property described must be com- pleted on or before the fifteenth day of January annually. The roll is then open for review until the fifteenth day of February following, and previous to the first day of March, the taxes must be levied and the tax roll delivered to the auditor general of the State. The time, then, in which a new member of the Board has to become familiar with the mass of evidence presented upon which to base his judgment as to a proper value of the properties mentioned is at the most 26 fifteen days; the number, of companies to be assessed is 376 and thear. separate values ranging from |500 to over |50,000,000. The time allow^ for these examinations and computations is, in the opinion of the J^oard, too brief for such study of the problem as will enable a member acting for the first time to perform this duty as directed by the statute. We would therefore, recommend that the law be so amended that any appointment for the full term of six years shall date from the first day of March of the year in which such appointment is made. FIFTH EEPOET OF STATE BOARD OF ASSESSORS. The new constitution having provided for the assessment by the State Board of Assessors of the property of telegraph and telephone conipames in addition to duties heretofore imposed, and the Legislature of 1909, having amended in some important particulars the statute under which the Board has heretofore acted, the full text of the constitution and statutes now in force relative to the assessment of and levying of taxes upon such properties as come within the jurisdiction of the Board is here submitted : CONSTITUTION. ARTICLE X. FINANCE AND TAXATION. Sec. 3. The legislature shall provide by law a uniform rule of taxation, except on property paying specific taxes, and taxes shall be levied on such property as shall be prescribed by law : Provided, That the legisla- ture shall provide by law a uniform rule of taxation for such prop- erty as shall be assessed by a State Board of Assessors, and the rate of taxation on such property shall be the rate which the State Board of Assessors shall ascertain and determine is the average rate levied upon other property upon which ad valorem taxes are assessed for State, county, township, school and municipal purposes. Sec. 5. The legislature may provide by law for the assessment at its true cash value by a State Board of Assessors, of which the Governor shall be ex-officio a member, of the property of corporations and the prop- erty, by whomsoever owned, operated or conducted, engaged in the busi- ness of transporting passengers and freight, transporting property by express, operating any union station or depot, transmitting messages by telephone or telegraph, loaning cars, operating refrigerator cars, fast freight lines or other car lines and running or operating cars in any manner upon railroads, or engaged in any other public service business; and for the levy and collection of taxes thereon. STATUTES. Act 282, P. A. 1905, as amended by Act 49, P. A. 1909. An act to provide for the assessment of the property, by whomsoever owned, operated or conducted, of railroad companies, union station and depot companies, telegraph companies, telephone companies, sleep- ing car companies, express companies, car loaning companies, stock ' car companies, refrigerator car companies, and fast freight companies, and all other companies owning, leasing, running or operating any 27 freight, stock, refrigerator, or any otlier cars, not being exclusively the property of any railroad company paying taxes upon its rolling stock under the provisions of this act, over or upon the line or lines of any railroad or railroads in this State, and for the levy of taxes thereon by a State Board of Assessors, and for the collection of such taxes, and to repeal all acts or parts of .acts contravening any of the provisions of this act. Section 1. The Board of State Tax Commissioners, created under tlie laws of this State, together with the Governor, shall ex-offlcio, constitute a State Board of Assessors, one of whom shall be elected chairman of said board. The secretary of the Board • of State Tax Commissioners shall be ex-offlcio secretary of the State Board of Assessors without extra compensation, and shall keep a record of all its proceedings in addition to such other duties as may be required of him by said board, and shall devote his whole time to the duties of his offlce. In iddition to the secretary, said board may- employ such other clerical assistance as may be necessary and required to perform the duties impased upon it by this act. Sec. 2. Provided, That the compensation paid for such clerical as- sistance shall not in any case exceed one thousand dollars for each person employed, per annum : Provided further, That said board may employ such other assistance as may be necessary, with the consent of the Gov- ernor and the Board of State Auditors. The compensation of the said secretary and clerks, and all other necffiisary expenses incurred in carry- ing out the provisions of this act, shall be allowed by the Board of Stat« Auditors upon proper vouchers approved by the chairman and secretary of the board, and paid by the State Treasurer out of the general fund. Sec. 3. The board shall have access to all books, papers, documents, statements and accounts, on file or of record in any of the departments of State, subject to the rules and regulations of the respective depart- ments relative to the care of public records. It shall have like access to all books, papers, documents, statements and accounts, on file or of record in counties, townships and municipalities. It shall have the right to subpoena witnesses, upon a subpoena signed by the chairman of said board and attested by the secretary thereof, delivered to such witnesses, which subpoena may be served by any person authorized to serve sub- poenas from courts of record in this State, and the attendance of wit- nesses, may be compelled by attachment, to be issued by any circuit court in this State, upon proper showing that such witness has been properly subpoenaed, and has refused to obey such subpoena. The person appear- ing in response to such subpoena shall receive like compensation as is allowed by the statutes of this State to witnesses in the circuit court, to be allowed by the Board of State Auditors upon the presentation of a copy of such subpoena, with the number of days' service and mileage en- dorsed thereon and approved by a member of said Board of Assessors, or the secretary thereof. Tiie person serving such subpoena shall receive the same compensation now allowed to sheriffs or other oflflcers for serving subpoenas. Said board shall have power to examine witnesses under oath, said oath to be administered by any member of the board, or by the secre- tary thereof. It shall haA'e the right to inspect and examine the books, pa- pers or accounts of any corporation, firm or individual owning property to be assessed by said board, and if such corporation, firm or individual 28 refuse to permit said inspection and examination, or neglect or fail to appear before said board in response to its subpoena, said corporation, firm or individual shall, for each such refusal, neglect or failure, forfeit the sum of five hundred dollars to the State, the sum so. forfeited to be recovered in a proper action brought in the name of the people of the State of Michigan, in any court of competent jurisdiction. Sec. 4. It shall be the duty of said board to make an annual assessment upon an assessment roll, to be prepared by said board, of the property by whomsoever owned, operated or conducted, and having a situs in this State as hereinafter defined, of railroad companies, union station and depot companies, telegraph companies, telephone companies, sleeping car companies, express companies, car loaning companies, stock car com- panies, refrigerator car companies, and fast freight line companies, and all other companies, owning, leasing, running or operating any freight, stock, refrigerator, or any other cars not being exclusively the property of any railroad company paying taxes upon its rolling stock under the pro- visions of this act, over or upon the line or linefe of any railroad or rail- roads in this State: Provided, That the property of telegraph and tele- phone companies whose gross receipts within the State for the year end- ing June thirty do not exceed five hundred dollars shall be exempt from taxation. All telegraph and telephone companies doing business in this State shall make the report required by section six of this act to the State Board of Assessors : Provided, That such report for the year nine- teen hundred nine shall be made and filed with' said board on or before the first day of November, nineteen hundred nine. Sec. 5. The term property, as used in this act, shall be deemed to in- clude all property, real or personal, belonging to the persons, corpora- tions, companies, copartnerships and associations subject to taxation un- der this act, including the right of way, road bed, stations, cars, rolling stock, tracks, wagons, horsesi, oifice furniture, telegraph and telephone poles, vrires, conduits, switchboards, and all other property used in carry- ing on their business and owned by them respectively, and all other real and personal property, and all franchises, said franchises not to be di- rectly assessed, but to be taken into consideration in determining the stalue of the other property: Provided, however, That this definition shall not include, apply to, or subject to taxation, such real estate as is owned and can be conveyed by such persons, corporations, companies, copartnerships and associations under the laws of this State which is not actually occupied in the exercise of their franchises, or in use in the proper operation and conduct of tlieir business ; but such real estate so excepted shall be liable to taxation in the same manner and for the same purposes and to the same extent and subject to the same conditions and limitations 'as to the collection and return of taxes thereon as is other real estate in the several townships or municipalities in which the same may be situated. The term company, corporation, copartnership, associa- tion, or person, wherever used in this act, shall apply to and be construed as referring respectively to any railroad company, union station and de- pot company, telegraph company, telephone company, sleeping car com- pany, express company, car loaning company, stock car company, refrig- erator or fast freight line company, and any other companies owning leasing, running or operating any freight, stock; refrigerator, or any other cars, not being exclusively the property of any railroad company paying taxes upon its rolling stock under the provisions of this act over 29 or upOn the line or lines of any railroad dr railroads in this State; and to any firm, joint stock association, copartnership, corporation, or other association or .person, engaged in carrying on any business, the property of which is subject to taxation under this act. The term "property hav- ing a situs in this State," shall include all the property, real and personal, of the persons, corporations, companies, copartnerships and associations enumerated in this act, owned, used and occupied by them within the limits of this State, apd also such proportion of their rolling stock, cars and other property as is used partly within and partly without this State, as herein provided to be determined. Sec. 6. The several corporations, persons, copartnerships, companies and -associations whose property is subject to assessment and taxation under the provisions of this act shall, annually, between the first day of July and the fifteenth day of September in each year, under oath of the president, secretary, superintendent, or chief officer of such corpora- tion, company or association, or of the person or persons owning such property, make and file with the State Board of Assessors, in such form as said board may provide, upon blanks to be furnished by said board, a statement' containing the following facts: The blanks furnished to railroad and union station and depot companies, telegraph and telephone companies, shall provide for the following information: First. The name of the company; Second. The nature of the company, and under the laws of what state or country organized; Third. The location of its principal office; Fourth. The name of the postoflfice address of the president, secretary, auditor, treasurer and superintendent or general manager; Fifth. The name and postoflfice address of the chief oflQcer or mana- ging agent of the company in Michigan; Sixth. The number of shares of capital stock; Seventh. The par value and market value, or, if there be no market value, the actual value, of the shares of stock on the thirtieth day of June of the year in which the report is made; Eighth. A detailed statement of the real estate owned by the company in Michigan, where situate, and the value thereof ; Ninth. A detailed statement of the personal property, including moneys, and credits owned by the company in Michigan on the thirtieth day of June in the year in which the report is made, where situate and the value thereof; Tenth. The total value of the real estate owned by the company outside of Michigan ; Eleventh. The total value of the personal property of the company situate outside of Michigan; Twelfth. The whole length of their lines, and the length of so much of their lines as is within, or is without Michigan, which lines shall in- clude what said railroad companies, union station and depot companies, telegraph companies, and telephone companies, control or use as owners, lessees or otherwise; Thirteenth. A statement of the entire gross receipts of the companies, from whatever source derived, for the year ending the thirtieth day of June in the year for which the report is made; Fourteenth. Such other facts and information as said board may re- quire, in the form of returns prescribed by it. 30 The blanks furnished to express companies shall provide for the fol- lowing information : First. The name of the company; Second. The nature of the company, under the laws of what state or country organized; Third. The location of its principal office; Fourth. The name and postoflSce addreSvS of the president, secretary, auditor, treasurer and superintendent or general manager; Fifth. The name and postofflce address of the chief engineer or mana- ging agent of the company in the State of Michigan; Sixth. The number of' shares of capital stock, (a) authorized (b) issued ; Seventh. The par and market value, or if there be no market value, the actual value of the shares of stock, together with the total amount of bonded indebtedness, on the thirtieth day of June of the year for which the report is made; Eighth. The situation, income and value in detail of its real estate in this State; Ninth. The total income from and cash value of all its real estate situated outside of this State; Tenth. A full and correct inventory, at the true cash value, of its personal property, including moneys and credits, within this State; Eleventh. Tlie true cash value of all of its personal property, including money and credits, without this State; Twelfth. The whole length and names of railroad lines and water and stage routes over which it did business, and separately in detail, the por-^ ■ tions of such lines and routes within this State, and the portions of such routes over navigable waters of the United States within this State ; Thirteenth. Such other facts and information as may be deemed nec- essary by the State Board of Assessors, or any member thereof, to the proper assessment of the property of such companies. The blanks furnished car loaning, stock car, refrigerator and fast freight line companies, and other car companies, and other companies owning, leasing or operating any cars not the property of railroad com- panies, upon railroads, shall provide for the following information : First. The name of the company; Second. The nature of the business of said company, and under the laws of what state or country organized ; Third. The location of its principal office; Fourth. The name and postoflfice address of the president, secretary, auditor, treasurer and superintendent or general manager; Fifth. The location of its principal office in the State of Michigan, to- gether with the name and address of the chief officer or managing agent of the company in Michigan; Sixth. The total number of cars and rolling stock of any such com- pany, run over or operated upon, any line or lines of railroad within this State each day during the entire year preceding the date of making and filing such report ; Seventh. The cost of construction of each of said cars ; Eighth. The length of time the same have been in service ; Ninth. The cash value of each of said cars so operated and run in this State, at the time of making and filing such report ; 31 Tenth. And such other and additional information as may be deemed necessary by said board, or any member thereof, to the proper assessment of the cars of such company in this State in accordance with the pro- visions of this act and to the -performance of the duty imposed upon it hereby. Sec. 7. Every joint stock association, company, co-partnership, or association incorporated or acting under the laws of this or any other State, or of any foreign nation, and conveying to, from, through, in or across the State, or any part thereof, passengers or travelers, in palace cars, drawing room cars, sleeping cars or tourist cars, under any con- tract, express or implied with any railroad company, or the managers, lessees, agents or receivers thereof, shall be deemed and held to be a . sleeping car company for the purposes of this act; and every such sleep- ing car company doing business in this State, shall annually, between the first day of Jtily and the thirty-first day of August, make out and de- liver to the State I3oard of Assessors, a statement, verified by the o^th of the officer or agent of such company making such statement, with reference to the thirtieth of June next preceding, showing: First. The total capital stock of such association, company, copartner- ship, or corporation invested in palace cars, drawing uom cars, sleeping cars and tourist cars; Second. The number of shares of capital stock issued and outstanding, and the par or face value of each share, representing its palace cars, dra,wing room cars, sleeping cars and tourist cars; Third. Its principal place of business; Fourth. The market value of said shares and stock on the thirtieth of June next preceding, and if such shares have no market value, then the actual value thereof; Fifth. All mortgages and where recorded, and the names and resi- dences of the holders of the same, together with the franchise and amounts thereof, upon its palace cars, drawing room cars, sleeping cars and tourist cars. Sixth, (a) The total length of the main lines of all the railroad com- panies over which said cars are run; (b) The total length of so much of the main line of the railroad companies over which said cars are run as is outside of the State of Midiigan; (c) The length of the main lines of said railroad companies over which said cars are run within each of the counties and townships within the State of Micliigan : Provided, That where the railroads over which said lines have double tracks, or a greater number of tracks than a single track, the statement shall only give the mileage as though such tracks were but a single track; and in case the State Board of Assessors shall require it, such statement shall show the number of miles of each or any particular railroad system or division within this State in detail. Upon the filing of such statements the State Board of Assessors shall examine them, and each of them, and if it shall deem the same insufficient, or in case it shall deem that other information is requisite, it shall require such officer to make such other and further statements relative to the information required by this act, as said State Board of- Assessors may call for. In determining the value of the personal property of any sleeping car company as herein defined subject to assessment and taxation in this State, the State Board of Assessors shall first ascertain the total value of the palace cars, draw- 32 ing room cars, sleeping room cars and tourist cars of such sleeping car company; such amount shall be taken and considered as the aggregate value of the personal property of said sleeping car company invested in and devoted to the sleeping car feature of its business. The board shall then multiply the amounts thus obtained by the number of miles of railroad main tracks over which such cars were used within the state of Michigan, and shall then divide the amount thus obtained by the num- ber of miles of railroad track over which such cars are used both within and without this State, and the quotient thus obtained shall be taken and considered as the true cash value of the personal property of such sleeping car company, subject to assessment and taxation within tjie State of Michigan. The said amount shall thereupon be assessed and taxed, and the taxes collected, in all respects in accordance with the ex- isting laws now in force for the taxation of the personal property of other companies and corporations which are assessed by the State Board of Assessors of the State of Michigan. Sec. 8. Blanks for making the statements provided for in sections six and seven shall be furnished to such companies on making applica- tion to said board : Provided, That the reports hereby provided for shall not in any way relieve any of said companies from making the reports now required to be made to other State officers. In case any company fail or refuses to make the statement required by this act, or refuses to furnish any information requested, the board shall inform itself as best it may on matters necessary to be known, in order to discharge its duties with respect to the assessment of the property of such companies, Any company which shall refuse or neglect to make the report required by this act or any part thereof, within the time specified, shall be subject to a penalty of five hundred dollars for each day of the continuance of such neglect or refusal to file said report, to be recovered in a proper ac- tion brought in the name of the people of the State of Michigan in any court of competent jurisdiction: Provided, That when any company shall show to the satisfaction of said board that it cannot furnish any of the information requested, said board may excuse said company from furnishing such information. Sec. 9. Subsequent to the filing of the reports required in the preced- ing sections, and prior to the fifteenth day of January in each year, it shall be the duty of the State Board of Assessors to prepare an assess- ment roll as provided in section four of this act, upon which they shall assess, at the true cash value, on the thirtieth day of June next preceding the time of making said assessment, all the property of the companies herein enumerated, subject to taxation under this act, which said assess- ments shall not be final until reviewed as hereinafter provided. For the purpose of arriving at the amount and character and true cash value of the property belonging to said companies as appearing upon the assess- ment roll for the purpose of assessment and taxation, the said board may personally inspect the property belonging to said companies, and may take into consideration the reports filed under this act, the reports and returns of said companies filed in the oflice of any officer of this State, and such other evidence or information as may be obtainable or possessed by said board, bearing thereon. In determining the true cash value of the property of each railroad and union station and depot company which owns, leases, operates or uses lines partly within or 33 - partly without this State, the said board shall be guided, in ascertaining the property subject to taxation in Michigan, by the proportion which the number of miles of main track controlled or used by said company as owner, lessee or otherwise, within the State of Michigan, bears to the en- tire mileage of main track controlled or used by said company as owner, lessee or otherwise, both within and without this State. In determining the true cash value of the property of each telegraph company and tele- phone company, which owns, leases, operates or uses lines partly within and partly without this State, the said board shall be guided, in ascer- taining the property subject to taxation in Michigan, by the proportion which the number of miles of telegraph or telephone lines controlled or used by said company as owner, lessee or otherwise, within the State of Michigan, bears to the entire mileage of telegraph or telephone lines con- trolled or used by said company, as owner, lessee or - otherwise, both within and without this State. In determining the true cash value of ■the property of express companies, they shall ascertain and determine the actual value in money of the entire amount of the capital stock and bonded indebtedness of such express company. From the amount so obtained and determined, said board shall deduct the actual value of all real estate owned by it as ascertained by said board, and the actual value of all its personal property as ascertained by said board, which is not used in the express business of such express' company. And the remainder thus obtained shall be used in determining the assessment of such express company in the following manner: The said board shall then divide the amount as obtained above by the total number of miles, as determined by said board, of railroad, stage^ water and other routes, over which the company did business to obtain the value per mile, and shall then multiply the value per mile thus obtained by the total num- ber of miles of such routes within this State, as determined by said board, to which result shall be added the value of all real estate owned by such express company in this State, as determined by said board, and the sum so obtained shall be taken and considered as the actual value of the property of such express company, subject to assessment and taxation in this State : Provided, That if in any case it shall become apparent to the said board that the ocean routes of any company are so different in character from its other, routes that the mileage basis of apportionment of the value of the entire property to be apportioned in Michigan would be unfair if the full mileage of such ocean routes were included, then it may make such allowance for such ocean routes of any company as in its judgment will bring such routes upon a parity with its other routes, being guided therein by the relative mileage values and earning capacities of such ocean and other routes. For this purpose the Board of Assessors shall require special reports of the character, mileage, earnings and value of such ocean routes and may exclude from its aggregate mileage any ocean routes respecting which the company shall fail to furnish reports, and no further penalty shall be imposed for the failure to report the mileage of ocean routes: Provided further, That if any such company shall claim, in writing, that the mileage basis of apportionment of the value of the entire property to be attributed to Michigan is unfair, then such board shall make such apportionment as shall in its judgment be fair, being guided by the mileage within and without the State, making 5 34 proper allowance for ocean mileage, as above provided for. In ascertain- ing tlie true cash value of the property in Michigan, of car loaning, stock car, refrigerator, fast freight line and other car companies, and other companies owning, leasing, running or operating cars subject to taxation under this act, the said State Board of Assessors shall be guided by the relation which the aggregate car mileage made or run by the entire number of cars owned or operated by each of such companies bears to the car mileage made or run by the entire number of cars owned or operated by any such company within this State. Sec. 10. Upon said assessment roll, after the name cf each of the companies assessed thereon, shall be placed a general description of the property of said companies, which shall be deemed to include all of the properties of said companies liable to taxation under this act. In the case of railroad,' union station and depot companies, such general descrip- tion may be as follows: "Real estate, rolling stock, right of way and appurtenances, and all other property used in carrying on the corporate' business and subject to taxation by a State Board of Assessors." In the case of telegraph and telephone companies, the following general de- scription may be used: "Real estate, exchanges, switchboards, conduits, telegraph and telephone poles, and lines, and other appurtenances, and all other property used in carrying on the business of said company, and subject to taxation by a State Board of Assessors." In the case of car loaning, stock car, refrigerator and fast freight line, and other car com- panies and other companies, owning, leasing, running or operating, any cars subject to taxation under this act, the following general descrip- tion maj"^ be used: "Oars subject to taxation by a State Board of As- sessors." In the case of express companies and sleeping car companies, the following general description may be used: "Property subject to taxation by a State Board of Assessors." In an appropriate column op- posite the names of said corporations shall be extended the cash valua- tions of the properties of the said companies so assessed. Sec. 11. On the third Monday of January in each year it shall be the duty of the State Board of Assessors to meet at the State Capitol at Lansing, and to continue in session from day to day for so long a period as may be necessary, not later than the fifteenth day of February next thereafter, for the purpose of reviewing said assessment roll, and any company or person interested shall have the right to appear during said period and be heard as to the valuation of the property of any company, and said Board of Assessors may, on such application or on its own motion, correct. the assessment or valuation of the property of such company in such manner as will, in its judgment, make the valuation thereof just and equal ; and for the purpose of arriving at tbe true cash value of the properties assessed on said assessment roll, may subpoena witnesses as provided in section three of this act, and have such hearing as may be deemed necessary. In case it shall appear or be made to appear to the members of said board, acting in review for assessment purposes, that the property of any corporation subject to taxation under the pro- visions of this act shall have been omitted from said assessment roll, it shall place the same thereon and make the assessment thereof as re- quired in sections nine and ten of this act: Provided, That any such assessment shall take place in time to allow five full days for the review 35 of the same before the expiration of the time herein provided for the completion of the review. After said State Board of Assessors shall have completed the review of said rolls as herein provided, they shall place opposite each description of property in said roll, in a column provided for that purpose, the true cash value of the same as ascertained and determined by them, and such valuation so fixed by them shall be the final valuation upon which the tax upon said property shall be levied and spread as herein provided. After said board shall have completed the review of said roll, a majority thereof shall certify under their hands ofBcially and spread on said roll, a certificate to the effect that the same has been acted upon and reviewed in accordance with law, which cer- tificate shall state all the alterations, changes, corrections and additions made in or to the assessment or vialuation of the property appearing on said roll. And all the alterations, changes and corrections made in the determination of the true cash value of the property of the State other than that included in this act upon which ad valorem taxes are assessed for State, county, township, school and municipal purposes for the cur- rent year, arid also all the alterations, changes and corrections made in the computation of the average rate as hereinafter provided., ' Sec. 12. It shall be the duty of the county clerk in each county in this State, as soon as possible after the equalization of the board of super- visors of his county of the assessment rolls of the several municipalities therein, and not later than the first day of December in each year, to make a report, duly certified, to the State Board of Assessors, of the rec- ord of such equalization and of the record required to be made under section thirty-seven of the general tax law, being section three thousand eight hundred sixty of the compiled laws of eighteen hundred ninety- seven, as appears upon the records of such board of supervisors, which report shall, among other things, contain a statement of the amount of ad valorem taxes to be raised in the several municipalities of such county, for State, county, municipal, township, school and other purposes, and a statement of the aggregate valuation of the property in each of said several municipalities, as taken from the assessment rolls of said mu- nicipalities for the year in which such equalization is made. It shall be the duty of the supervisor or other assessing officer of cities and vil- lages in this State governed by special charters, which provide for the collection of ad valorem taxes, which are not reported to the board of supervisors for the purposes of equalization or review, and the super- visors or other assessing officers of cities organized under general laws, to make, within the time above limited, a properly certified report to the State Board of Assessors of all ad valorem taxes raised in any of said municipalities, which have not been reported to the board of super- visors for the purpose of equalization- and review. In case any county clerk or any supervisor or assessing officer shall neglect or fail to make the report by this section required, within the time limited, the said State Board of Assessors shall inspect and examine, or cause an inspec- tion and examination of the records of said board of supervisors, or in cities affected by this section, an examination of the records of the -proper officers, for the purpose of procuring the information required for the purpose of arriving at the average rate of taxation in this State ; and the said board, in addition thereto, may require such reports on 36 blanks that it shall prepare and furnish therefor, from all county, State and municipal offlcers, as it shall deem necessary to the accomplishment of the purpose of this act. Any county clerk, supervisor or assessing ofiScer, who shall fail to make the report required by this section shall be subject to a penalty of one hundred dollars, to be recovered in a prop- er action in the name of the people of the State of Michigan, in any court of competent jurisdiction. Sec. 13. It shall be the duty of the said State Board of Assessors, not later than the fifteenth day of January in each year, from the iafor- mation contained in the reports provided for in section twelve of this act, to ascertain and determine the average rate of taxation for the year in which said reports are required to be made, levied upon other property u'pon which ad valorem taxes are assessed for State, county, township, school and municipal purposes, and enter the same upon its records forthwith, together with the method by which such average rate was ascertained and determined. Sec. 14. Said board shall tax the property of the several companies as assessed by it at the rate as determined by it, and the amount of tax to be paid by each of said companies shall be extended upon said assess- ment roll, opposite the description of their respective properties. After the completion of said tax roll, and prior to the first day of March, in each year, the said board shall attach thereto a certificate, signed by the members of the board, or a majoi-ity thereof, which shall be as follows: "We do hereby certify that we have set down in the above assessment roll, all the property of railroad companies, express companies, union station and depot companies, telegraph and telephone companies, car loaning, stock car, refrigerator and fast freight line, and other car companies, and other companies owning, leasing, running or operating cars, and sleeping car companies, liable to be taxed in this State, ac- cording to our best information, and that we have estimated the same at what we believe to be the true cash value thereof, and that we have assessed the taxes thereon at the average rate of taxes for State, county, township, school, municipal and other purposes, levied through this State during the preceding year, as determined by us." The said tax roll shall thereupon be forthwith delivered to the Auditor General, who shall im- mediately notify by registered mail the several companies taxed thereon to pay the taxes extended thereon to the State Treasurer. The said taxes shall be payable on the first day of April, following the assessment and levy thereof, and shall be in lieu of all taxes for State and local pur- poses, not including special assessments on property particularly bene- fited, made in any county, city, village or township. All taxes not paid before the first day of May in the year in which the same are payable, shall bear interest thereafter at the rate of one per centum per month or any fraction thereof. The taxes so extended against said companies shall become forthwith a debt from each of said companies to the State and shall constitute a lien upon all the property of said companies, real, personal and mixed, which lien shall take precedence of all demands, judgments, assignments by warranty deed or otherwise, or decrees against said companies, which lien and debt may be enforced by seizure, or sale of said property or such portion thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the same, as hereinbefore provided. The State Board of Assessors 37 shall, upon the completion of said roll and the correction hereinbefore provided for, annex to said roll a warrant, signed by the said State board, or a majority of them, commanding the Auditor General to collect the sev- eral sums mentioned in the last column of such roll, and being the sum for which the said company was assessed and was liable to pay for a tax upon its property, under the provisions of this act for the purposes pro- vided for in this act; and the said warrant shall authorize and conu- mand the Auditor General, in case any corporation, company or person named in the assessment roll shall neglect or refuse to pay its tax, to levy the same by distress and sale of the properties of said corporation, com- pany or person or such portion thereof as shall be necessary to raise sufficient mondy to satisfy said tax and the expense of said sale, after . giving the same notice of said sales as provided for in the general laws of this State for the sale of property seized for taxes, and offered for sale : Provided, That he may bring an action in the name of the People of the State of Michigan in any court of competent jurisdiction in the State of Michigan, or in any other State, for the enforcement of said lien, and upon the recovery of judgment or decree therein, the same may be col- lected by execution, levy and sale, as in other cases, upon judgments in courts of record. Sec. 15. If any court of competent jurisdiction shall adjudge that any tax levied under the provisions of this act is illegal on account of any irregularity or informality in the determination of average rate of taxation required to be ascertained and determined by said State Board of Assessors, or for the reason that such average rate has not been ascer- tained and determined according to law, it shall be the duty of said State Board of Assessors, whether any part of the taxes assessed and levied has been paid or not, to redetermine and reascertain the average rate of taxation throughout the State in accordance with law, and when such redetermination and reascertainment has been had, to make a du- plicate of the original assessment roll and to extend the taxes thereon according to such redetermined and reascertained average rate, and when such duplicate roll has been made and the taxes extended thereon in the manner provided in this section, it shall be of the same force and effect as an original assessment made in accordance with law. All pro- ceedings on the redetermination and I'eascertainment of such average rate and for the extension and collection of taxes upon said duplicaite assessment rolls shall be conducted in the method originally provided for, so far as may be. Whenever any sum or part thereof levied upon any property subject to taxation under this act, so set aside, has been paid and not refunded, the payment so made shall be applied upon, the reas- sessment upon said property, and the reassessment to that extent shall be deemed to be satisfied. Sec. 16. No tax assessed upon any property and no average rate de- termined by said Staite Board of Assessors as hereinbefore required, shall be held invalid by any court of this State on account of any irregularity in any assessment or on account of any assessment or tax roll not hav- ing been made or proceeding had within the time required by law, or on account of the property having been assessed without the name of the owner, or in the name of any corporation or person other than the owner, or on account of any other irregularity, informality or omission, if the method and manner of ascertaining and determining the average rate of 38 taxation on property in this State is in accordance with the constitution and statutes of this State. Sec. 17. All taxes collected under this act shall be applied in paying the interest upon the primary school, university and other educational funds, and the interest and principal of the State debt, in the order here- in recited, until the extinguishment of the State debt, other than the amounts due to educational funds, when such taxes shall be added to and constitute a part of the primary school interest fund; and such taxes as are collected under the provisions of this act shall be treated and disbursed as specific taxes are now treated and disbursed : Provided, however, That if any of the corporations, companies or associations here- in named were not paying specific taxes to this State on Noveimber six, A. D. nineteen hundred, the tax collected from such corporations, com- panies, or associations under this act shall be paid into and become a part of the general fund of the State. Sec. 18. Nothing herein contained shall be deemed a waiver or affect the collection of the specific taxes required to be paid by the companies hereby affected, on the first day of July in the year nineteen hundred nine, and previous years, under the general laws upon the property or business of such companies within this State. The existing laws providing for the collection of such specific taxes shall be continued in force until the collection and payment of all taxes levied thereunder for the year nine- teen hundred nine and previous years. Sec. 19. If said board shall wilfully assess any property at more or less that what the members taking part in making such assessment believe to be its true cash value, the members voting in favor of such assessment shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars each. Sec. 20. If any person, company, association or corportaion whose property is subject to assessment under this act shall directly or in- directly promise, .offer or give to any member of said board, during his term of office, or to any other person at his request, any gratuity of any kind whatever, such person or corporation shall forfeit to the State the sum of ten thousand dollars for each such offense, to be recovered in an action in the name of the people of the State of Michigan, in any cc^urt of competent jurisdiction*. And the recovery of such fine under this act shall not constitute a bar to any prosecution of the person or colrporation so offending under the criminal laws of this State. Sec. 21. All acts or parts of acts, whether contained in any act for the incorporation of rail-road companies, union stations and depot com- panies, telegraph and telephone conipanies, express companies, car loan- ing companies, stock car companies, refrigerator car companies, sleeping car companies, fast freight line companies, or other car companies, or in any other law of the State, so far as such acts or parts of acts are inconsistent with the provisions of this act, are hereby repealed, except as herein expressly stated: Provided, however, That all taxes levied or in process of assessment and levy, under the act to which this act is amendatory, shall be assessed, levied and collected under said act; all rights which the State now has under any of said acts for taxes or penalties shall not be in any way affected by this act; noi- shall this act constitute a bar to any prosecution or suit for such taxes" or penalties or the recovery of judgment therefor. 39 STATE BOARD OF ASSESSORS. The Legislature of 1909, acting under the new constitution amended the act prescribing the powers and duties of the State Board of As- sessors by adding the properties of telegraph and telephone companies to those already under the jurisdiction of the Board for the purpose of assessment and levying of taxes. This required an appraisal of the properties as a preliminary step tO' their assessment. How that was done and the results obtained will be referred to in another part of the report. The manner of assessment of railroad companies and the diflQculiies encountered in arriving at a true cash value of the same wa i 1 reated of in our last report and the Board has nothing to add to what was then said upon this subject. The assessed valuation of all properties under the jurisdiction of the Board for 1908 was: Railroad Companies $207,305,000 00 Sleeping Car Companies 500,000 00 . Express Companies ,. 1,211, (>25 00 Oar Loaning Companies '. 973,300 00 $209,989,925 00 The average rate of $18.0080 per $1,000 being applied to those flg- u¥es resulted in a tax levy of $3,781,505.55. ASSESSED VALUATION FOR 1909. Railroad Companies $211,764,500 00 Sleeping Car Companies 500,000 00 Express Companies 1,287,020 00 Car Loaning Companies 1,131,250 00 Tfelegraph and Telephone Companies 20,948,375 00 $235,631,145 00 The average rate of $20.6733 per $1,000 being applied to these figures resulted in a tax levy of $4,871,275.86. Telephone and telegraph companies were first assessed and taxed under the ad valorem system in 1909. The amount of taxes levied for that year were $433,072.50. Taxes levied on the same class of property for the year 1908 under the specific system was $148,482.01. These figures show an increase of $286,590.29 in favor of the method adopted in 1909. A comparative statement of the taxes levied by the board since 1902 with those levied by the Legislature for state purposes discloses:* 40 State Board of Assessors. State Tax. 1902 $3,313,013 37 $2,669,875 29 1903 3,796,359 79 4,003,255 11 1904 3,360,278 77 2,958,004 98 1905- 3,566,882 47 3,871,080 34 1906 3,442,620 74 3,384,064 57 1907 3,690,202 07 4,886,742 37 1908 3,781,505 55 4,194,333 80 1909 4,871,275 86 5,929,304 89 Total ". $29,822,138 62 $31,896,661 35 The taxes levied by this board forming but a part of the primary school fund of the state, it might not be inappropriate to mention in connection with this comparative table, that during the period covered by the same, this fund has received from other sources $2,439,875.29 making a total amount of $32,262^013.91 or $365,352.56 in excess of all state taxes levied during the corresponding years. CAR LOANING COMPANIES. The subject of the assessment of Car Loaning Companies was treated quite at length in our last report. The work of securing detailed in- formation on which to base a correct valuation of this class of property was extended in the years 1908, 1909 so as to include all movements of every car, in the state, belonging to these companies, throughout the en- tire year. This included both mileage and speed of travel. The results show in the increased assessment as follows: Assessment for the year 1907, $741,400; assessment for the year 1909, $1,131,250, Increase, $389,850. The total increased valuation of this property since a systematic method of securing data was inaugurated is $642,600. EXPRESS COMPANIES. The Legislature of 1909 so amended the act under which these com- panies are assessed that the board was given discretion in determining the vexed question of Oceanic Routes. This has eliminated much of the trouble in ai-riving at a correct valuation of their properties and has re- sulted in a substantial increase in their assessments. TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE COMPANIES. Under the provisions of Act No. 49, Public Acts of 1909, telephone ajad "telegraph properties were brought under the ad valorem system of assess- ment, and taxation thereby adding new duties to those of the State Board of Assessors. The Act provides for an annual assessment : "Of railroad companies, union station and depot companies, telegraph companies, telephone companies, sleeping car companies, express com- panies, car loaning companies, stock car companies, refrigerator car com- panies atid fast freight line companies, and all other companies owning, leasing, running or operating any freight, stock, refrigerator or any other 41 cars not being exclusively the property of any railroad company paying taxes upon its rolling stock under the provisions of this act, over or upon the line or lines of any railroad or railroads in this State: Provided, That the property of telegraph and telephone companies whose gross re- ceipts within this State for the year ending June thirty do not exceed five hundred dollars shall be exempt from taxation. All telegraph and tele- phone companies doing business in this State shall make the report re- quired by section six of -this act to the State Board of Assessors." This Act did not go into effect until September, 1909, but it was no sooner passed and signed than it became apparent, if an intelligent as- sessment was to be made, no time could be lost waiting for the bill to become law. The Board began at once the work of formulating blanks for annual reports, and as telephone and telegraph property, as a class, had not previously appeared on any of the assessment rolls of the State, plans were laid for an appraisal of the various companies. Assistants were employed for this purpose who had been actively en- gaged in the operating departments of telephone companies, and had had practical experience in construction and installation. These men, with members of the Board, met the officials of several of the larger companies and tentatively went over various plans of appraisal. As a result of these conferences, inventory blanks were finally prepared which listed in a thorough manner all the equipment and construction material, which assembled makes up the completed plant. Fortunately for the board some of the largest manufacturers of tele- phone and telegraph equipment were located in Chicago and Cleveland, and visits were made to these plants in order that the Board might familiarize itself with regard to the mirious kinds and prices of equip- ment. Oorresimndence was also had with other prominent manufacturers and prices obtained on wire of all kinds, cable and various specialties. . Telephone engineers and others long familiar with construction .•jud its cost were interviewed regarding the same and opinions had regarding the per cent of depreciation which should be considered in estimating the present value. The largest companies were, in the meantinie, individually preparing price lists showing costs of material and cost of installation, as deteir- mined by the experience of the company. After careful consideration of information- from these various sources, a table of unit prices was prepared which seemed fairly to repre- sent conditions in Michigan. It is but fair to state that while there was much question among tele- phone and telegraph ofQcials regarding the constitutionality of the act piroviding for the ad valorem assessment of this class of property, they were almost without exception willing and anxious to render to the Board any and all assistance possible. Without this hearty co-opera- tion, it would have been impossible to have made more than a beginning of an appraisal in the limited amount of time at the disposal of the Board. From the records of the offices of the Secretary of State and Auditor General was compiled a list of companies, and this was largely increased by the special reports received from the larger operating companies showing the names of over five hundred companies of which the Board had previously no knowledge. 42 Blanks were sent to all companies and persons for the purpose of an annual report, and the inTentory blank set out to such, as appeared at this time to be assessable. As fast as the annual report was returned and new companies appeared to coma under the provisions of this act, in- ventory blanks were also sent them. In the meantime, the properties were being visited by the inspectors who were now working night and day in order to check over the quantities reported and estimate the amount of depreciation. These blanks were then returned to the office and placed in the hands of a compiling and computing force, which applied the unit prices to. the various quantities, afterwards affecting the same with the depreciation reported by the inspector, in this manner was determined the cost of the property and its present value. This melthod of appraisal was applied to the property of about 220 companies and the results, together with the annual report and such other information as could be obtained, formed the basis for the first assessment made. 43 yaluatton of property assessed iV the State Board of Assessors and taxes levied thereon— 1908. BAUJIOAD COMPANIES. Name of Railroad. Ann Arbor Railroad Co Arcadia & Betsey River Railway Co Au Sable & Northwestern Railway Co Benton Harbor Terminal Railway Co Boyne City, Gaylord & Alpena Railroad Co Chicago, Kalamazoo & Saginaw Railway Co Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co Cincinnati Northern Railroad Co Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway, operated by the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.,. Copper Range Railroad Co Delray Connecting Railroad Co Delray Terminal Railroad Co Detroit & Charlevoix Railroad Co Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co Detroit, Monroe & Toledo Short Line Railway Co Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railway Co Detroit Terminal Railroad Co Detroit, Toledo & Milwaukee Railroad Co Detroit Union Railroad Depot & Station Co Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co East Jordan & Southern Railroad Co Erie & Michigan Railway & Navigation Co Escanaba & Lake Superior Railroad Co Port Street Union Depot Co Gogebic & Montreal River Railroad, operated by the Wis- consin Central Railway Co Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co , Muskegon, Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co Traverse City Railroad Co Grand Trunk Western Railway Co Chicago, Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction Rail- way Co Cincinnati, Saginaw & Mackinaw Railway Co Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co. (Grand Haven to Pontiac) ". Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co. (Pon- tiac to Detroit) Grand Rapids Terminal Railroad Co Michigan Air Line Railway Co St. Clair Tunnel Co Toledo, Saginaw & Muskegon Railway Co Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad Co Hecla Belt) Line Railroad Co Hecia & Torch Lake Railroad Co Kalamazoo, Gull Lake & Northern Railroad Co Keweenaw Central Railroad Co Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co Detroit & Chicago Railroad Co Detroit, Hillsdale & Southwestern Railway Co Detroit, Monroe & Toledo Railroad Co Fort Wayne & Jackson Railroad Co Kalamazoo, Allegan & Grand Rapids Railroad Co Kalamazoo & White Pigeon Railroad Co Northern Central Michigan Railroad Co Sturgis, Goshen & St. Louis Railroad Co Lake Superior & Ishpeming Railway Co Lake Superior & Southern Railway Co . . .' Lansing Manufacturers' Railroad Co Lansing Southern Railroad Co Lewiston & Southeastern Railroad Co Manistee & Grand Rapids Railroad Co Manistee & Luther Railroad Co Manistee & Northeastern Railroad Co Manistique, Marquette & Northern Railroad Co Manistiqiie Railway Co ; Marlborough Railroad Co Marquette & Southeastern Railway Co , Assessed Taxes Value Levied. $7,725,000 $139,112 00 63,500 1,143 51 225,000 4,051 81 10,000 180 08 650,000 11,705 22 610,000 10,984 90 3,800,000 68,430 53 11,850,000 213,395 20 580,000 10,444 66 925,000 16,657 43 2,593,000 46,694 83 170,000 3,061 37 32,500 585 .26 400,000 7,203 21 4,565,000 82,206 68 1,220,000 21,969 80 900,000 16,207 23 211,000 3,799 70 1,200,000 21,609 64 1,450,000 26,111 65 9,675,000 174,227 73 205,000 3,691 65 126,000 2,269 01 1,066,000 19,196 56 1,800,000 32,414 46 '380,000 6,843 05 10,350,000 186,383 15 500,000 9,004 02 250,000 4,502 01 11,700,000 210,694 00 1,400,000 25,211 25 700,000 12,605 62 4,100,000 73,832 94 2,100,000 37,816 87 300,000 5,402 41 500,000 9,004 02 1,300,000 23,410 44 550,000 9,904 42 2,000,000 36,016 07 25,000 450 20 375,000 6,753 01 3,000 54 02 50,000 900 40 9,450,000 170,175 92 230,000 4,141 85 700,000 1«,605 62 3,950,000 71,131 73 600,000 10,804 82 1,225,000 22,059 84 800,000 14,406 43 900,000 16,207 23 32,000 576 26 1,050,000 18,908 44 10,000 180 08 90,000 1,620 72 5,000 90 04 30,000 540 24 400,000 7,203 21 190,000 3,421 53 1,575,000 28,362 65 400,000 7,203 21 185,000 2,971 33 5,000 90 04 600,000 10,804 82 44, Valuation of Property Assessed. — Continued. BAILBOAD COMPANIES. Name of Railroad. Mason & Oceana Railroad Co Micliigan Central Railroad Co , Battle Creek & Sturgis Railway Co Bay City & Battle Creek Railway Co Bucbanan & St. Josepb River Railroad Co Canada Southern Bridge Co Detroit & Bay City Railroad Co Detroit, Delray & Dearborn Railroad Co Detroit Manufacturers' Railroad Co Detroit River Tunnel Co Grand River Valley Railroad C(r Jackson, Lansing & Saginaw Railroad Co Kalamazoo & South Haven Railroad Co Michigan Air Line Railroad Co St. Clair & Western Railroad Co St. Joseph, South Bend & Southern Railroad Co. . Toledo,' Canada Southern & Detroit Railway Co Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co Mineral Range & Hancock & Calumet Railroad Co Munising Railway Co Onaway & North Michigan Railway Co Pere Marquette Railroad Co '. Pere Marquette Railroad Co. (from Lawton to South Haven) Pontiac, Oxford & Northern Railroad Co Port Huron Southern Railway Co Quincy & Torch Lake Railroad Co Rapid Railroad Co Sainte Marie Union Depot Co Sault Ste. Marie Bridge Co Sagihaw, Owosso & Lansing Railroad Co Traverse City, Leelanau & Manistique Railway Co Wabash Railroad Co Wisconsin & Michigan Railway Co Wyandotte Southern Railroad Co Wyandotte Terminal Railroad Co Total SLEEPING CAR COMPANIES. The Pullman Company EXPRESS COMPANIES. Adams Express Co American Express Co .' Canadian Express Co Pacific Express Co United States Express Co Western Express Co Total CAR COaiPANIES. American Cotton Oil Co American Fast Freight Line American Refrigerator Transit Co ... . American Tank Line Armour Car Lines Arms Palace Horse Car Co Barrett Manufacturing Co Boomer Coal & Coke Co Canadian Oil Refining Co Case, J. I., Threshing Machine Co. . . . ■$500,000 Assessed Taxes , Value Levied. $80,000 $1,440 64 32,300,000 581,659 50 360,000 6,482 89 150,000 2,701 21 10,000 180 08 300,000 5,402 41 4,400,000 79,235 35 50,000 900 40 100,000 1,800 80 332,500 5,987 67 1,500,000 27,012 05 4,500,000 81,036 15 325,000 5,852 61 2,OT5,000 37,366 67 100,00(^ 1,800 80 350,000 6,302 81 4,500,000 81,036 15 6,525,000 117,502 42 2,125,000 38,267 07 600,000 10,804 82 15,000 270 12 28,550,000 514,129 37 250,000 4,502 01 725,000 13,055 82 25,000 450 20 131,000 2,719 21 100,000 1,800 80 100,000 1,800 80 450,000 8,103 62 1,500 27 01 100,000 1,800 80 4,400,000 79,235 35 675,000 12,155 42 18,000 324 14 20,000 360 16 $207,305,000 $3,733,155 42 $9,004 02 $163,800 $2,949 71 655,525 .11,804 72 12,550 ?26 00 83,900 1,510 87 258,850 4,661 38 37,000 666 30 $1,211,625 $21,818 08 $1,200 $21 61 500 9 00 23,100 415 99 1,800 32 41 155,400 2,798 45 3,000 54 02 1,500 27 01 37,800 68C 70 1,800 32 41 400 7 20 45 Valuation of Property Assessed — Continued^ CAK CO.MPANIES — Continued. Chicago, New York & Boston Refrigerator Co Chicago Refrigerator Car Co Cold Biaat Transportation Co Consolidated Rolling Stock Co Craig Oil Co Crystal Car Lines Gudahy Milwaukee Refrigerator Line Cudahy Refrigerator Line and Cudahy Oil Tank Line. Dairy Shippers' Despatch Doud Stock Car Co . . . -. Bzpress Car Line Fairmont Coal Co , . . Fox River Despatch Freedom Oil Works German-American Car Co Crermania Refining Co Heinz,. H. J. & Co Independent Refining Co Indian Refining Co : . . . . Indianapolis Abajttoir Co Johnson Automatic Refrigerator Line. Eingan Refrigerator Line Lackawanna Live Stock Transportation Co. Libby, McNeill & Libby Live Poultry Transportation Co Lutz & Schramm Co Mather Horse & Stock Car Co Merctiauts' Despatch Transportation Co. Midland Linseed Despatch Milwaukee Refrigerator Transit Co Missouri River Despatch . Morreil Refrigerator Line Morris, Nelson, & Co Moton Gregson Car Line National Car Co National Car Line Co New York Butchers' Dressed Meai Co. Pacific Fruit Express Paragon Refining Co Peerless Transit Line Pittsburg-Buffalo Co Pittsburgh Coal Co Produce Shippers' Despatch Santa Fe Refrigerator Despatch St. Louis Refrigerator Car Co Shamberg, J. & Son Shippers' Refrigerating Car Co Stiefel, I. & Co Streets' Western Stable Car Line Swift Refrigerator Transportation Co Union Refrigerator Transit Company of Wisconsin. union Tank Line Co Webber, Richard Western Heater Despatch .' Western Live Stock Express Total SUMMARY. Railroad Companies Sleeping Car Companies Express Companies Car Loaning Companies Total Assessed Taxes Value Levied. $35,000 $633 88 3,000 54 02 40,200 723 9'2 20,400 367 36 4,200 75 63 600 10 80 14,400 259 31 16,800 302 53 9,200 165 67 9,600 172 88 600 10 80 1,800 32 41 7,500 133 06 600 7,000 10 80 126 06 1.200 21 61 7,500 135 06 900 16 21 600 10 80 600 10 80 600 10 80 1,500 27 01 19,000 342 15 2,400 43 22 4,200 75 63 1,000 18 01 24,300 437 60 50,000 900 40 1,200 21 61 4,200 75 63 2,400 43 22 5,000 90 04 11,500 207 09 600 10 80 20,100 361 96 65,200 1,174 12 9,200 165 67 36,300 653 69 3,600 64 83 600 10 80 400 7 20 1,200 21 61 2,500 45 02 15,900 286 33 19,200 345 75 3,500 63 03 2,700 48 62 1,000 18 01 18.400 331 35 141,000 2,539 13 13,300 239 51 78,000 1,404 63 2,000 36 02 900 16 21 2,000 36 02 $973,300 $17,527 13 $207,305,000 $3,733,155 42 500,000 9,004 02 1,211,623 21,818 98 •973,300 17,527 IS $209,989,925 $3,781,50.5 53 46 Valuation of property assessed by the State Board of Assessors and taxes levied thereon— 1909. BA.ILBOAD COMPANIES. Name of Railroad. Ann Arbor Railroad Co Arcadia & Betsey River Railway Co Au Sable & Northwestern Railway Co Benton Harbor Terminal Railway Co Boyne City, Gaylord & Alpena Railroad Co Chicago, Kalamazoo & Saginaw Railway Co Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co Cincinnati Northern Railroad Co Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway, operated by the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. Copper Range Railroad Co Delray Connecting Railroad Co Delray Terminal Railroad Co Detroit & Charlevoix Railroad Co Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co Detroit, Monroe & Toledo Short Line Railway Co Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railway Co Detroit Terminal Railroad Co Detroit, Toledo & Milwaukee Railroad Co Detroit Union Railroad Depot & Station Co Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic, Railway Co East Jordan & Southern Railroad Co Erie & Michigan Railway & Navigation Co Bscanaba & Lake Superior Railroad Co Fort Street Union Depot Co Gogebic & Montreal River Railroad, operated by the Wis- consin Central Railway Co Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co Muskegon & Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co Traverse City Railroad Co Grand Trunk Western Railway Co Chicago, Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction Rail' way Co Cincinnati Saginaw & Mackinaw Railway Co Grand Rapids Terminal Railroad Co Michigan Air Line Railway Co St. Clair Tunnel Co Toledo, Saginaw & Muskegon Hallway Co Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad Co Detroit Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co. (Grandl Haven to Pontlac) Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co. (Pontlac to Detroit) Hecia Belt Line Railroad Co Hecla & Torch Lake Railroad Co Kalamazoo, Gull Lake & Northern Railroad Co Keweenaw Central Railroad Co Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Eiiilway Co Detroit & Chicago Railroad Co Detroit, Hillsdale & Southwestern Railway Co Detroit, Monroe & Toledo Railroad Co Fort Wayne & Jackson Railroad Co Kalamazoo, Allegan & Grand Rapids Railroad Co Kalamazoo & White Pigeon Railroad Co Northern Central Michigan Railroad Co Sturgis, Goshen & St. Louis Railroad Co Lake Superior & Ishpemlng Railway Co Lake Superior Southern Railway Co Lansing Manufacturers' Railroad Co Lansing Southern Railroad Co Lewlston & SouthesLstern Railroad Co Manistee & Grand Rapids Railroad Co Manistee & Luther Railroad Co Manistee & Northeastern Railroad Co Manlstlque & Northern Railroad Co Manlstique Railway Co --r Assessed Taxes Value Levied. $7,600,000 $157,117 16 60,000 1,240 40 225,000 4,651 49 15,000 310 10 675,000 13,954 48 625,000 12,920 82 3,840,000 79,385 51 11,875,000 245,495 56 575,000 11,887 15 925,000 19,122 81 2,600,000 53,750 61 200,000 4,134 66 35,000 723 57 400,000 8,269 32 4,585,000, 94,787 13 1,300,000 26,875 30 800,000 16,538 65 215,000 4,444 76 1,100,000 22,740 64 1,500,000 31,009 97 9,600,000 198,463 78 225,000 4,651 49 122,000 2,522 14 1,126,000 23,278 15 1,800,000 37,211 96 380,000 7,855 86 10,350,000 213,968 76 500,000 10,336 66 250,000 5,168 33 11,900,000 246,012 39 1,400,000 28,942 63 700,000 14,471 32 300,000 6,201 99 500,000 10,336 66 1,300,000 26,875 30 550,000 11,370 32 2,000,000 41,346 62 4,100,000 84,760 57 2,100,000 43,413 95 25,000 516 83 375,000 7,752 49 3,000 62,02 50,000 1,033 67 9,650,000 199,497 44 230,000 4,754 86 750,000 15,504 98 3,950,000 81,659 58 700,000 14,471 32 1,450,000 29,976 30 800,000 16,538 65 1,075,000 22,223 81 32,000 661 55 1,050,000 21,706 98 10,000 206 73 100,000 2,067 33 12,000 248 08 27,500 568 52 350,000 7,235 66 200,000 4,134 66 1,625,000 33,594 13 350,000 7,238 66 150,000 3,101 00 47 Valuation of Property Assessed — Continued. BAILKOAD COMPANIES. Name of Railroad. Marlborough Eallroad Co Marquette & Southeastern Railway Co :.......... Mason & Oceana Railroad Co \ _\ Michigan Central Railroad Co ,', Battle Creek & Sturgis Railway Co ..'. Bay City & Battle Creek Railway Co Buchanan & St. Joseph River Railroad Co Canada Southern Bridge Co Detroit & Bay City Railroad Co Detroit Belt Line Railroad Co Detroit, Delray & Dearborn Railroad Co . ." Detroit Manufacturers' Railroad Co Detroit River Tunnel Co Grand River Valley Railroad Co Jackson, Lansing & Saginaw Railroad Co Kalamazoo & South Haven Railroad Co Lansing Transit Railway Co Michigan Air Line Railroad Co St. Clair & Western Railroad Co St. Joseph, South Bend & Southern Railroad Co Toledo, Canada Southern & Detroit Railway Co Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co Mineral Range Railroad Co. and Hancock & Calumet Rail- road Co Muntslng Railway Co -. . . Onaway & North Michigan Railway Co Pere Marquette Railroad Co Pere Marquette Railroad Co. (from Lawton to South Haven) Pontiac, Oxford & Northern Railroad Co Port Huron Southern Railway Co Qulncy & Torch Lake Railroad Co , Rapid Railroad Co Sainte Marie Union Depot Co Sault Ste. Marie Bridge Co Saginaw, Owosso & Lansing Railroad Co Traverse City, Leelanau & Manistique Jlailway Co Wabash Railroad Co Wisconsin & Michigan Railway Co Wyandotte Southern Railroad Co Wyandotte Terminal Railroad Co Total SLEEPING CAK COMPANIES. The Pullman Company EXPEESS COMPANIES. Adams Express Co American Express Co Canadian Express Co Pacific Express Co United States Express Co Wells Fargo & Co Western Express Co Total Value $3,000 550,000 75,000 33,000,000 360,000 150,000 10,000 300,000 4,720,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 900,000 1,500,000 5,000,000 325,000 10,000 2,075,000 100,000 350,000 4,700,000 6,600,000 2,000,000 614,000 12,500 30,000,000 250,000 750,000 25,000 151,000 100,000 100,000 450,000 1,500 75,000 4,400,000 550,000 20,000 20,000 $211,764,500 $500,000 $156,640 716,975 11,280 86,100 240,725 25,000 , 50,300 $1,287,020 Taxes Levied. $62 02 11,370 32 1,550 50 682,219 24 7,442 39 3,101 00 206 73 6,201 99 97,578 02 1,033 67 1,033 67 2,067 33 18,605 98 31,009 97 103,366 55 6,718 83 206 73 42,897 12 2,067 33 7,235 66 97,164 56 136,443 85 41,346 62 12,693 41 258 42 020,199 31 5,168 33 15,504 98 516 83 3,121 67 2,067 33 2,067 33 9,302 99 31 01 1,550 50 90,062 57 11,370 32 413 47 413 47 $4,377,873 24 $10,336 66 $3,238 27 14,822 25 233 19 1,779 97 4,976 58 516 83 1,039 87 $26,606 96 48 Valuation of Property Assessed — Continued. CAK COIIPANIBS. Agar Fresh Meat Express American Cottoii Oil Co 1 . American Fast Freight Line American Refrigerator Transit Co American Tanlj Line Amco Express Tank Line Armour Car Lines Arms Palace Horse Car Co Atlantic Seaboard Despatch Barrett Manufacturing Co Boomer Coal & Coke Co '■ . . . Case, J. I., Threshing Maphine Co Chicago, New Yorls; & Boston Refrigerator Co Chicago Refrigerator Car Co Cold Blast Transportation Co Columbia Tank Line Consolidated Rolling Stock Co Craig Oil Co Crystal Car Lines Cudahy Milwaukee Refrigerator Line Cudahy Refrigerator Line & Cudahy Oil Tank Line Dairy Shippers' Despatch Doud Stock Car Co Fairmont Coal Co Fidelity Oil Co Fox Riyer Despatch German-American Car Co Germania Refining Co Heinz, H. J. & Co Independent Refining Co Kingan Refrigerator Line . . . .' Lackawanna Live Stock Transportation Co Lewis, F. J., Manufacturing Co ■ Libby, McNeil & Libby Live Poultry Transportation Co Lutz & Schramm Co -. Mather Horse & Stock Car Co Mercliauts' Despatch Transportation Co Midland Linseed Despatch Milwaukee Refrigerator Transit Co Mineral Point Zinc Co Missouri River Despatch >- Morrell Refrigerator Line Morris, Nelson, & Co .' National Car Co National Car Line Co Pacific Fruit Express Co Paragon Refining CD Peerless Transit Line Pittsburg-Buffalo Co Pittsburg Coal Co Ruddy Refrigerator Line Santa Fe Refrigerator Despatch St. Louis Refrigerator Car Co St. Louis Independent Packing Co Shamberg, J. & Son Shippers' Refrigerating Car Co Stiefel, The I. Company Streets' Western Stable Car Line Swift Refrigerator Transportation Co Assessed Value $2,000 700 1,600 26,000 1,200 2,000 151,650 2,900 600 6,400 28,600 400 32,700 4,500 68,300 300 20,400 5,600 800 13,500 23,000 850 10,400 500 1,200 3,500 3,600 1,400 5,050 1,400 1,650 18,900 1,600 4,800 5,100 1,500 10,300 105,000 700 4,400 2,000 2,800 6,400 30,000 7,500 79,600- 39,600 7,700 2,100 500 5,800 2,000 31,000 7,000 900 1,000 4,500 1,000 22,600 182,250 49 Valuation of Property Assessed — Continued. CAK COMPANIES — Continued. Union Refrigerator Transit Company of Wisconsin Union Tanli Line Co United Coal Co Webber, Richard Western Heater Despatch Western Live Stock Express , Total TBLHPHONE COMPANIES. Adams, Carl J AdamsvUle Telephone Union Addison Teleplione Exchange Adrian Telephone Co Alamo Mutual Telephone Co Alcona County Telephone Co Aldrich, A. A. & Son Allen Mutual Telephone Co Almont Telephone Co ' Alpena Mutual Benefit Telephone Co American Telephone & Telegraph Company of Michigan American District Telegraph Company of Detroit American District Telegraph Company of Michigan, Limited. Arbela Mutual Telephone Company Arenac Telephone Co Augusta Co-operative Telephone Co Aureliua and Vevay Telephone Co Bad Axe Telephone Co Bainbridge Telephone Co Bail, Mrs. Edwin Baraga County Telephone Co Beaverton Telephone Co Benzie County Telephone Co Billings Telephone Co Birch Lake Telephone Co Blanehard Telephone Co Blissfleld Telephone Co Bloomingdale Telephone Co Boulton, B. P Brant Rural Exchange Brigham, F. D Britton Telephone Co Bronson Mutual Telephone Co Brown, C. C Brown City Telephone Co Camden Rural Telephone Co Capac Telephone & Messenger Co Cass City 'Telephone Co Cass County Home Telephone Co Central Citizens Telephone Association. Central Michigan Telephone Co Chambers' Telephone Co Chandler, I. B Chapin Mutual Telephone Co Cheboygan Telephone Co Chesaning Home Telephone Co Chickaming & Weesaw Telephone Co Citizens' Telephone Company of Banfleld Citizens' Telephone Company of Battle Creek . . . Citizens' Telephone Company of Grand Rapids. Citizens' Telephone Company of Howard City . . . Citizens' Telephone Company of Jackson Citizens' Telephone Company of Marshall Citizens' Telephone Company of Muskegon Citizens' Telephone Company of Schoolcraft Clark Wireless Telegraph & Telephone Co Clayton Telephone Co Coleman Telephone Company Assessed Taxes Value Levied. S15,000 $310 10 92,400 1,910 21 5,200 107 50 1,200 24 81 3,500 72 36 2,700 55 82 $1,131,250 $23,386 70 $1,850 $38 25 3,000 62 02 800 16 54 42,000 868 28 1,500 31 01 2,550 52 72 1,350 27 91 1,950 40 31 3,500 72 36 30,000 620 20 450,000 9,302 99 10,000 206 73 7,500 155 05 4,500 93 03 3,850 79 59 1,100 22 74 1,200 24 81 4,500 93 03 3,000 62 02 850 17 57 2,500 51 68 700 14 47 27,000 558 18 2,000 41 35 5,000 103 37 3,500 72 36 16,000 330 77 900 18 61 600 12 40 1,400 28 94 1,850 38 25 1.850 38 25 3,500 72 36 1,600 33 08 6,000 124 04 10,000 206 73 4,000 82 69 7,000 144 71 47,000 971 65 1.500 31 01 28,000 578 85 1,800 37 21 3,600 74 42 950 19 64 14,000 289 43 7,000 144 71 550 11 87 1,500 31 01 72,000 1,488 48 2,300,000 47,548 61 750 15 50 160,000 3,307 73 17,000 351 45 140,000 2,894 26 7,100 146 78 5,000 103 37 1,150 23 77 2,800 57 89 50 Valuation of Property Assessed — OontiMued. TELEPHONE COMPANIES — Continued. Concord Telephone Co , Coopers' Branch Telephone Co County Line Indgpendent Telephone Co Dansville Telephone Exchange Davison Telephone Co Deckerviile Telephone Co Deerfield Farmers' Telephone Co Dinkel, Mrs. George J Easton Independent Telephone Co Eaton County Telephone Co Eau Claire Telephone Co. . ; Elwell Telephone Co Faner, John G Farmers' Telephone Company of Coe Farmers' Exchange Telephone Co Farmers' Independent Telephone Co Farmers' Mutual Telephone Co Fayette Eural Telephone Co Fowler, C. E Freeland Telephone Co : ^ Fremont Farmers' Telephone Co., Ltd Frontier Eural Exchange Gaines Farmers' Mutual Telephone Co Garter, H. L Girard Telephone Co Grand Blanc Telephone Co Grand Ledge Telephone Co. Grawn Eural Telephone Co Hallenbeck, S. C Hamilton, W. E Hamilton Mutual Telephone Co Hanover Telephone Co Harlan Eural Telephone Co Hengesbach, Theo. N Hibbler & Mack Hilbert, P. F Hillsdale County Telephone Co Hlnchman Telephone Co Holden & Wilson Holton Eural Telephone Co : Home Telephone Company of Detroit Home Telephone Company of Grass Lake Home Telephone Company of Monroe Home Telephone Company of Palo Home Telephone & Telegraph Company, The Homer Telephone Company Hulbert, S. W Hemingway, B. J. : Ida Telephone Co Inter-County Telephone Co .■ Inter-State Long Distance Telephone Co Iosco County , Telephone Co Independent Telephone Co. of Tipton Kibble Telephone Co Lacey Mutual Telephone Co Lakefleld Telephone Co Lamb, W. J Laporte Telephone Co Laughridge, C. A Leslie Home Telephone Co Levering Telephone Co Litchfield Farmers' Mutual Telephone Co Livingston County Mutual Telephone Co Locke Mutual Telephone Co. Lund, Carl Macon Telephone Co Manlstique Telephone Co Assessed Taxes Value Levied. $2,500 $51 68 850 17 57 1,200 24 81 500 10 34 4,150 85 79 2,400 49 62 7,000 144 71 1,000 20 67 2,000 41 35 17,000 351 45 1,800 37 21 2,000 41 35 1,500 31 01 1,000 20 67 6,500 134 38 2,000 41 35 1,800 37 21 250 5 17 1,150 23 77 2,700 55 82 6,500 134 38 1,500 31 01 1,250 25 84 1,250 25 84 2,000 41 35 3,000 62 02 20,000 413 47 3,000 62 02 3,650 75 46 700 14 47 1,200 24 81 175 3 62 1,700 35 14 1,800 37 21 1,000 20 67 5,000 103 37 7,000 144 71 1,200 24 81 4,600 95 10 3,800 78 56 1,492,000 30,844 58 13,850 286 33 8,000 165 39 10,000 206 73 20,000 413 47 16,000 330 77 2,850 58 92 1,100 22 74 9,000 ' 186 06 24,000 496 16 225,000 4,651 49 2,400 49 62 700 14 47 80,000 1,653 86 1,600 33 08 1,200 24 81 1,850 38 25 1,350 27 91 1,350 27 91 8,000 165 39 3,500 72 36 300 6 20 26,000 537 51 2,300 47 55 1,300 26 88 1,000 20 67 15,000 310 10 51 Taluation of Property Assessed — Contimued. TBLEPHONB COMPANIES — Continued. Marquette County Telephone Co Memphis Telephone Co Michigan State Telephone Co Milf ord Home Telephone Co Missaukee Telephone Co Monroe County Telephone Co Montmorency County Telephone Company Moore, W. J ' Morenci Telephone Co Morrice Telephone Co Mosgroye, B. E Mundy Telephone Co > Munising Telephone & Electric Co Mutual Telephone Company of Copemish Mutual Telephone Company of Lapeer County National District Telegraph Company of Michigan North Adams Telephone Exchange North Branch Telephone Co North Onondaga and Baton Eapids Telephone Co North Parma Telephone Co Northeastern Telephone & Telegraph Co Norton Rural Telephone Co Oakland County Telephone Co Oceana Farmers' Mutual Telephone Co Ogemaw Telephone Co Okemos Independent Telephone Co Onaway Telephone Co Ousted Switchboard Association Ontonagon County Telephone Co Orion Telephone Co Osceola Rural Telephone Co Oscoda County Farmers' Mutual Telephone Co Otsego County Telephone Palo Telephone Co People's Mutual Telephone Company of Leroy and White Oak People's Telephone Company of Wayne Phillips Telephone Line Pigeon Telephone Co Pine River Telephone Association Plumley, H. A Postal Telegraph-Cable Co Pullman Telephone Co Reading Central Telephone Co Readmond Township Telephone Co Ries, Ray M • RoUin Telephone Co Roscommon Telephone Co ■ Rural Telephone Company of Waterloo Richmond Telephone Co Sagola ■ Telephone Co St. Charles Roadway Telephone Co St. Clair Central Telephone Co St. Mary's Telephone Co Saline Telephone Co • Sand Creek Telephone Co Sandusky Telephone Co Saugatuck & Gauges Telephone Co Scio Rural Telephone Shiawassee Telephone Co - Shiawassee & Genesee Mutual Telephone Co Smith, Geo. W Smyrna Telephone Co Soper, H. B ■ Southern Michigan Telephone Co Spinks Corners Telephone Co. Springport Telephone Exchange Co Springport Mutual Telephone Co Staley & Bricker ■ ■ • -, Steuben County Electric Telephone Co Sunfield Co-operative Telephone Co Superior Telephone Co ■■ Swaverly Telephone Co _• • • Assessed Taxes Value Levied. $40,000 $826 93 2,800 57 89 11,500,000 237,743 07 10,000 206 73 11,000 227 41 15,000 310 10 3,500 72 36 17,000 351 45 15,000 310 10 650 13 44 .950 19 64 5,500 113 70 2,000 41 35 2,900 59 95 2,400 49 62 5,000 103 37 750 15 50 3,000 62 02 1,100 22 74 2,500 51 68 80,000 1,653 86 900 18 61 22,000 454 81 8,000 165 39 1,900 39 28 1,400 28 94 19,000 392 79 900 18 61 5,000 103 37 3,200 66 15 2,700 55 82 4,000 82 69 7,500 155 05 6,000 124 04 1,600 33 08 8,000 165 39 4,000 82 69 1,200 24 81 700 14 47 1,150 23 77 300,000 6,201 99 3,500 72 36 7,400 152 98 1,000 20 67 1,200 24 81 3,000 62 02 1,500 31 01 6,000 124 04 2,500 51 68 1,600 33 08 800 16 54 1,550 32 04 2,500 51 68 10,000 206 73 1,600 33 08 6,500 134 38 3,000 62 02 1,000 20 67 2,500 51 68 3,500 72 36 1,350 27 91 1,550 32 04 1,100 22 74 220,000 4,548 13 1,500 ,31 01 1,600 33 08 1,000 20 67 5,000 103 37 2,000 41 35 7,000 144 71 2,200 45 48 23,000 516 83 52 Valuation of Property Assessed — Continued. TELEPHONE COMPANIES COnCluded. Tecumseh Telephone Co Tekonsha Telephone Co Thetford Telephone Co Three Rivers Telephone Co Thumb Telephone Co Traverse Bays Telephone Co Twin City Telephone Co Union Telephone Co ■ Union Telephone Line United Home Telephone Co United States Telephone Co United Wireless Telegraph Co Valley Home Telephone Co Wakeman, Lyle O Waldron Telephone Co Walled Lake Home Telephone Co Washtenaw Home Telephone Co Watson Telephone Co Wayne County Telephone Co Western Union Telegraph Co Wexford County Independent Telephone Co Whitetord Farmers' Telephone Co Williamston Home Telephone Co. Wilson, P. P. Wise, D. E Worden Farmers' Rural Telephone Co, ... . Zeigen, Chas Total SUMMARY. Railroad Companies Sleeping Car Companies Express Companies Car Loaning Companies Telegraph and Telephone Companies, Total , Assessed Taxes Value Levied. $13,500 $279 09 7,000 144 71 > 3,500 72 36 85,000 1,757 23 4,200 86 83 16,000 330 77 65,000 1,343 77 545,000 11,266 95 8,000 165 39 70,000 1,447 13 65,000 1,343 77 5,000 103 37 400,000 8,269 32 1,500 31 01 1,500 31 01 2,500 51 68 85,000 1,757 23 2,500 51 68 13,000 268 75 1,500,000 31,009 97 4,300 88 90 5,000 103 37 4,000 82 69 1,650 34 11 5,000 103 37 1,500 31 01 2,200 45 48 $20,948,375 $433,072 30 $211,764,500 $4,377,873 24 500,000 10,336 66 1,287,020 26,606 96 1,131,250 23,386 70 20,948,375 433,072 30 $235,631,145 $4,871,275 86 53 EAILROAD TAXATION. So many inquiries, from officials of other States are being received at the office of the Board for information concerning the problem of "railroad taxation" and what methods are being employed to solve this most important question, that Commissioner Shields has been requested by the other Commissioners to allow an address which he delivered before the International Tax Association at Milwaukee, in September of this year, to be incorporated in our report. This he has consented to do. His treatment of this subject meets with our hearty approval, and we believe that the same will prove valuable to those seeking information on one of the most interesting and vital questions that confront the public at the present time. RAILROAD TAXATION. BY EGBERT H. SHIELDS. To one that has had to do with the practical side of life rather than the theoretical; who has been educated in the slow school of experience rather than in the university whose curriculum includes the science of political economy, it is no small task to prepare in form and vet-biage ap- propriate to so august a body as the International Tax Association, an essay on a theme so pregnant with theories as "Railroad Taxation Problems." And so my subject might well be "Experience v. Theory." Because of individual selfishness, there exists, and probably always will exist great inequality in the taxation of railroads, as in other property, and any theory tending to ameliorate this condition ought to receive the closest study and attention from those interested in this great problem. Speaking from experience I would say that of all the theories advanced for the equitable taxation of railroads, at least those that have come under toy observation, not one in its universal application supplies a satisfac- tory remedy. Experience teaches me that no single theory, no hard and last rule may be applied to all railroads alike and produce equitable results in taxation. This lack of uniformity of method in the taxation of railroads in the different states furnishes one of the great railroad taxation problems of the day; and if some method could be devised and applied whereby all railroads, and more especially inter-state railroads, could be taxed upon the same general basis, one of the great railroad problems would be solved; but no theory should be arbitrarily employed without first con- sidering the equity of the results which follow it. A casual study of the revenue laws of the various states of the union, reveals a wide divergence both in taxation principles and in application, resulting in a corresponding difference in tax burdens that is well nigh 54 startling. For instance, the resultant tax on railroad property varies from |148. per mile in Indian Territory to |1,926. per mile in New Jersey (1908) the average tax per mile for all states being $382. with only ten states approaching even approximately the average, the rate for Michigan being $396. This wide divergence in results cannot be entirely explained away by any theory of value; it is the inevitable result of the application of differdnt theories, or methods of taxation by the taxing bodies in the diflferent states, and calls for a remedy. Given a body of twelve hundred or fifteen hundred local assessing o£B- cers each in his district valuing different parts of the railway property of the State and the result is going to be inharmonious and inequitable. And yet in as great a measure this situation is produced today through the lack of anything even approaching uniformity of methods employed by the taxing bodies of the diflferent states. And the results attained force the conclusion upon the investigator that the question of method is one of the most complex connected with the matter of railroad taxr ation. It also furnishes convincing proof that certain forms of specific taxation are employed because of their simplicity of administration rather than because of the equity of the results obtained. Whatever the first impression, analysis will show that the diversities in the various systems employed in the diflferent states are not altogether accidental nor without refason, but they arise from the diversities in the general theory of taxation and from the peculiar problems which surround the whole subject of railroad taxation. My own state, Michigan, has had much experience in the taxation of railroads. It was some twelve or thirteen years ago when Hazen S. Pingree, then Governor, first warned the people of the great danger threatened by powerful private corporations and the first to awake to the great inequalities in railroad taxation and to initiate steps for re- form. At that time, railroad influence controlled the politics of the State and railroad property did not pay its fair proportion of the taxes. Today, all this has changed. In Michigan all property is now assessed under the ad valorem system. By this is meant according to the actual value of the property and not its physical value alone. In regard to railroads, it includes all their property, real or personal, used in carrying on their business. It includes the right. of way, road beds, stations, cars, rolling stock, tracks and all franchises; although the franchises are not directly assessed, but are taken into consideration in determining the value of the property. For the purpose of arriving at the amount and character and true cash value of railroad property the State Board of Assessors may personally inspect the property belonging to the company, and may also take into consideration the reports filed with that board or the reports and returns of those companies filed in the oflflce of any ofllcer of the State, and such other evidence or information as may be obtainable or be possessed by that board, bearing thereon. In other words, the board may avail itself of all the information it may obtain from any source. Previous to the adoption of the present system, the railroads paid a specific tax. The principal objection to this system was the inequalities produced in the relative amount of taxes paid by the diflferent railroad companies. The plan provided for a certain per cent of the gross earn- 55 ings per mile and was graduated. It may have been the fault of the graduating, but the fact remains that the tax was not an equitable one and the system was abolished. Many theories were submitted to the State Board of Assessors, every one of them having stron| advocates; but we found no single theory adapted to an equitable assessment of all the railroads. Take the theory of net earnings as a basis of taxation. We no sooner begin its application than we find a railroad that has no net earnings, and this theory in this particular instance must be abandoned forthwith. The utter lack of uniformity of system among the railroad accountants also made the net earnings reported too uncertain a quantity to apply generally with any degree of certainty that they were correct. And how could this theory be applied to a railroad company that might have ex- pended a million dollars in extensions not yet operative and earning nothing? These are some of the objections advanced against the net earnings tax theory. While I believe that the measure of value of a rail- road property is its earning capacity, when it has any, the objections to the net earnings system are given to show the impracticability of its universal application. ' We found many objections to the so-called stock and bond theory of raining a railroad, though fully appreciative of the advantage of know- mg the value of the stock and bonds issued. But as far as applying this theory to all the railroads in Michigan was concerned, it was found to be impracticable from the fact that the stocks and bonds of but a com- paratively few railroads were quoted in the market, that the stocks and bonds of many of the railroads were unknown to the open market and the method could be applied only to the few railroads. Then, too, the computation of the bond value is rendered intricate and uncertain by reason of the fact that there may be several different issues of bonds issued by a company upon different portions of its line or upon the same portion of its line; or an issue may cover a line partly in one state and partly in an adjoining state; lor the issue may have been made at a certain time covering the whole line, "since which time tlie line may have been extended without it appearing how the issue is affected, or in what manner. Another diflSculty encountered in attempting to apply the stock and bonds method in determining the value of railroads lies in the separa- tion of railroad property devoted to operation from the property owned by the railroad but not used in its operation. The stocks and bonds of a railroad company represent the value of all the property of that com- pany whether devoted to operation or not; manufacturing jrtants, real estate, mines, elevators, warehouses, stock and bonds in other corpora- tions, etc. This latter property is subject to local appraisal and taxa- tion. To ascertain and separate all these items and make the proper deductions from the total value represented by the stocks and bonds,, would involve more time and labor than the ends would seem to justify. And when we consider, in addition to the intricacy and uncertainty of " the computation of stocks and bonds values, the manipulation by stock brokers, regardless of actual values, and the many conditions that affect the price or value of the stocks and bonds regardless of the real value of the property itself, we cannot but appreciate the incompetency an* unreliability of this system. 56 It is contended by some that the best available measure of the value of a railroad is the cost of construction as. shown by the general balance sheet of the company. There can be little said in favor of the method. While it may be of assistance to the assessor to know the cost of the railroad in deitermining its value, the queslion of whether the road is worth more or less than its cost of construction is decided upon other considerations. We found that this method received the approval only of those railroads that would be benefited by its application, and it received but little consideration at the hands of the assessors. Still another method, and one that claims some distinguished ad- herents, is what is called "The inventory method supplemented by a consideration of the effective earning capacity of the roads." Probably in Michigan this is better known as the "Oooley- Adams" method. This method contemplates a complete inventory of all the physical elements of the road, showing the cost of reproduction and the present value sup- plemented by a capitalization of the net corporate surplus earnings. This scheme of railroad appraisal received its first application in 1900 in Michigan, its execution being placed by the tax commission under the supervision of Prof. Mortimer E. Cobley, Dean of the Department of Engineering of the University of Michigan, and, admittedly, a gentle- man of great engineering skill and ability. In his appraisal of the so- called physical or tangible elements of the Michigan railroads, Cooley proceeded in the same manner as if a new road were projected in the exact location of the present road, and computed the cost of building and equipping the road to the extent already existing, everything being new, and then, allowing for depreciation where deemed necessary and proper, fixed other values representing the actual or present condition of those elements subject to change with time. This work included a careful inventory and inspection by competent engineers of practically every locomotive and passenger car belonging to Michigan railroads, as well as all shop machinery and tools, locomotive, passenger, freight and miscellaneous equipment and of all stores and supplies. Experienced railroad engineers proceeded over the different railroads by means of hand-cars or on foot and made a personal inspection of all the railroads in the State. The work was classified under thirty-seven different items, or accounts, and included:, engineering; right of way and station grounds ; real estate ; grading ; terminals ; bridges ; culverts and trestles ; ties; rails, track fastenings, frogs, switches and crossings; ballast, track laying and surfacing; fencing; cattle guards and signs; interlocking and signal apparatus; telegraph; stations, buildings and fixtures; shops, round-houses and turn-tables; shop machinery and tools; water stations; grain elevators; warehouses; docks and wharfs; miscellaneous struc- tures; locomotives; passenger equipment; freight equipment; miscel- laneous equipment; telephone; ferries and steamships; electric plants; terminals; legal expenses; interest; miscellaneous expenses and supplies. The result of this most complete inventory showed the total cost of - reproduction of the railroads of Michigan to be |202,716,262, and ttie "Present Value," that is the value after allowing for depreciation, $166,398,156. But this was an appraisal of the physical elements of the railroads, and did not presume to represent their actual or cash value. It was said that in many of the railroads there existed non-physical, or 57 intangible or franchise elements possessing a value beyond that found in the appraisal of the physical properties. Mr. Cooley's part of the work being completed, the rest of the work embraced in this general plan was placed in the hands of Prof. Henry C. Adams, Statistician to the Inter- state 'Commerce Commission. And no one more familiar with the work at hand, nor better fitted by education and experience to cope with this subject could have been chosen. The rule submitted by Prof. Adams for the determination of the non- physical values of railroad properties is as follows: 1. Begin with gross earnings from operation, deduct therefrom the aggregate of operating expenses, and the remainder may be termed in- come from operation. To this should be added income from corporate investments, giving a sum which may be termed total income,, and which represents the amount at the disposal of the corporation for the support of its capital and for the determination of its annual surplus. 2. Deduct from the above amount, that is to say, total income, an an- nuity properly chargeable to capital, a certain per cent of the appraised value of the phvsical properties. 3. From this amount should be deducted taxes, rents paid for the lease of property operated, provided such property is not covered by the physical valuation made the basis of the annuity referred to under para- graph 2, and permanent improvements charged directly to income. -The remainder would represent the surplus which, capitalized at a certain rate of interest gives the value of immaterial properties. The following illustration will show the result of the application of the Cooley-Adams theory, or plan, or the "Inventory method, supple- mented by capitalization of corporate surplus earnings : Prof. Adams found from the average gross earnings of the Michigan Central System for the years 1898. to 1902 inclusive, that the average net earnings amounted to f3,620,37T The Michigan proportion, based on track mileage, was 2,503,345 Mr. Cooley had appraised the physical elements at 45,438,599 Prof. Adams allowed an annuity of 8 1-2 per cent on the physical elements, or 1,590,351 He then deducted this amount from the total net earnings, leaving a remainder of 912,994 This amount was then capitalized at 5 per cent to determine the value of the non-physical elements which amounted to 18,259,880 To this amount was added the value of the physical elements ' appraised by Mr. Cooley, at 45,438,599 And the total value of the road in question was fixed at. . . . 63,698,479 Plausible as it may appear, however, this ingenious method does not entirely fill all the requirements of the case at hand, at least not as it was applied in Michigan. In the first plate, it will be observed that at any stage of the process a deficit might be discovered, and where such was actually the case, the physical value as found by Mr. Cooley was taken and regarded as the value of the property. The rule, apparently, does not work both ways. Now, as a general principle; if 'the amount as shown by the physical appraisal of railroad property which earns more 58 than a fair percentage of profit does not represent its actual cash value, neither does the physical appraisal of a railroad property which does not earn a fair percentage of profit, represent its actual cash value. And in this connection it may be of interest to state that in the Cooley- Adams appraisal of Michigan railroads a non-physical value was placed on only twenty-six of the 123 railroads appraised, and the physical appraisal made by Mr. Cooley was adopted as the actual cash value of the other 97 roads. An analysis of this theory, therefore, disclosed the fact that in reality two distinct methods are employed in valuing the same class of property. The method employed in valuing the 97 railroads that did not earn more than a "fair profit," is the inventory plan pure and simple whereby the value was determined by an inventory of the physical elements only. While in the valuation of the 26 railroads earning more than a "fair . profit" the capitalization of a portion of the net earnings followed by a further capitalization of the surplus net earnings is the method employed. Here, then, we have two different methods or stands of valuation em- ployed in valuing the same class of property which is hardly in harmony with the constitution and laws of our State. But there is another reason which would preclude the application of this twin theory in assessing Michigan railroads. The rate of taxation levied against the railroads in Michigan is the average rate of taxation levied upon other property of the State upon which ad valorem taxes are assessed for State, county, township, school and municipal purposes. Now this theory is applicable to a considerable amount of other property in the State, but is not applied in a single instance by any of the seven- teen hundred assessing officers; and furthermore, because of the technical skill and theoretical training "required for its intelligent application, its adoption is not likely. It would, therefore, be manifestly unfair to adopt this plan in the assessment of the railroad property unless the same plan be used in the assessment of all other property to which this theory might equally ap- piy- I have so far enumerated some of the railroad taxation problems. In Michigan the problem of how to compel the railroad companies to pay at least their fair share of the tax burdens of the State' has been solved. But there are two problems in connection with the taxation of Michi- gan railroads that-are not solved; problems that are becoming of greater . importance every day to every tax payer in the State. The first of these problems is how to obtain an equitable and fair rate to apply to the assessed valuation of these properties. As before stated the rate applied is the average rate levied upon other property of the State upon which ad valorem taxes are assessed for State county, town- ship, school and municipal purposes. It is the sworn duty of the State Beard of Assessors to assess the railroad property at its full cash value and to ascertain and determine the average rate of taxation levied upon other property and to tax the property of the several companies accord- ingly. The Board has no discretionary powers to equalize. The rate, obtained by a simple mathematical calculation, must be applied. The amount of taxes to be raised is not determined in the same way as are the requirements for state, county, township and municipal purposes* 59 Now, while we do not contend that the railroad companies are assessed beyond their value, it is generally admitted that the general property in the State is assessed below its value, resulting in an "average rate" correspondingly higher than it ought to be. This is one of 51iehigan's railroad taxation problems yet to be solved. The other problem referred to relates to the disposition of the taxes paid by the railroad companies. All taxes collected from the railroad companies are distributed to the various school districts in the State in proportion to the number of children of school age residing therein. The money so received by these school districts may be applied only in paying the wages of school teachers and tuition for high school pupils and for no other purpose. / While, theoretically, this method of distribution seem equitable on its face, the fact is that many school districts in the Statel are receiving annually more money from this source than can with any degree of reason be applied to the payment of teacher's salaries and tuition as required by law. This has already resulted in the accumulation of large funds in the treasuries of many of these school districts, in some in- stances amounting to thousands of dollars, and as these accumulations will increase from year to year as the annual distribution of railroad taxes is made, the situation a few generations hence may be better left to the imagination. In closing I would say that, in the preparation of this paper, I have rather confined myself "to railroad taxation problems that have come under my observation in Michigan, and they are respectfully submitted here with the indulgent hope that some of the experiences cited may be of possible bemeflt to those interested in solving the great problem of railroad taxation. Those experiences have led me to the following con- clusions. 1. To remove inequalities in the assessment of all property taxable on an advalorem basis, the text of the laws and the methods of their ad- ministration should be improved so as to require the use of uniform tables, rules and directions by all local assessors and boards of review or equalization, with the view of making assessment work more accurate, economical and uniform throughout the State. 2. Efforts should be directed to the reduction of all ad valorem tax rates to the lowest practicable limit, by securing the assessment of all property at full value, and by limiting public expenditures to the ac- tual requirements of the government when economically administered. 3. All public utility corporations should be assessed by a State board. 4. Whenever, by the operation of law, or of custom, the general property of a State is assessed at any percentage less than full value, all property assessed on an ad valorem basis should be assessed on the same percentage of value. 5. The great cost incidental to the annual appraisal of the physical elements of a railroad for assessment purposes, and the apparent ap- proximation only of values obtained, would seem to make this method impracticable, unsatisfactory, and without justification. 60 (7», t-i Oi oj 7 r/j r-i ^ orj •s- n P •S i 'J^ iH O Oi COOlif iOiOOOiHOI>^0»0"3 OS CNWif! 3 09U3 H.HI> os"3»HOJOowoooo^-IHD^(^oo»'-|lN MaiOT|<00t-Mr-H00O «OMOO^MCO"3co ■ o S o 00 00 (N OSI>00 CCCD»0 CON CO • MiO'^OCO©l>OCOOO'*'^l>OOOeOiH.-i^ «DQOOJ(N'^COOOOi«Ort)i-(OSO>CDT}(i-iOr-«3 l>^'*OS'*000000i-(Ot-'-<'-'OI^OSt-i~i00 «C0003 (MO'-HNWCO'OeDCOWMNeDMO Moost^i-(r-'-'<*>ooio .HOSI> 00»<-( 00OSU3 mOOONOMO-^rHCOCDWiHCOOJiOrHiOOO WiCOOiCOiOO"3000NW>OiOOSCO CD CSJlO WCCt-iH iH iHCOCD O)iO»OO0>00CT'*I>"-i"3CV3CSiO-i 00 CO CI t-i OS O O CD OJ r-t N-tJI OI ^ ■^ 00 CO OS O CO ^ «o t- ooocooooswiooco'^ooeDeDcDoseDeoo'-i C0C0i0C0OI>C0O**-^00«0)t^l"-CD00I>C0 NC^eOCaoOOO'^Ot^MOOOSCD'* osoooo rlfC0iOO'-i0100'~iT}<(M«D0S0S'^e0 I^OOCO iC-^OCOeDO-^COi-Ht^WOOOJ>H WCfliO (M CD l> CD O CO""* rH « CO M W W ea i-l OS N i-l (M iHOOt-ml>OSOCqCDCOt--r-ICO'CCDiDOOCOr- COr-l-#i-H(NO>OCOlNQO'-'*CDCOOSrHf-«(N OJW5THOOt^eD'-(CDTlONCDM»OOCOrHCOMiO QOOOO fH,-(O-*"5(NC0 «^ N tH COT-(eDMC<)0>»OiDMl>COOSN01- 1^ O OO CO CO CD CO CO O O "* i-( "* tJ.COCO"3CO'^00cD CO»Or-rHt^ ^COMC^OOMCDiO-* OSCDtH N IM iHCO'^ i-iCO »-H iH"*-* CO i-H Is 1^ - : ^^oos w-tS in :,.8-8|ig lo ■•a ■g-S .3 as? r-^ ^ ^ iH iH r-l rH rH ^ 1-1 (M (M W IN (N W M N « CO «« CC CO TO M CO ■* ■<*< ^ •■# 61 Naco CO 00 CO CO00r^Ot^M'^e0«^^Mf-tt»«»t0O«0»O--H»n^'^^«t0t-NiO«Oi0«00ON0»«00(NCOOiO(DNl>M"^Nr^O-^NMOO^Ot--*t--00'^(N«DU3000 00'»'0)CO«Mr-t"^asOOt^MI>00'-H(N'ftCCON03eDNrHCaU3'Ot--OOr-*QOOiOS'-tt--l>MiHi-iQO l-'»0OO'^'^OC0NfflC0eDOM0SC0O'-H'*OC0C0t-NMC0t-0J"*0000(NNi-HTjOOCOCD'^OCONt>aJrJ(Mr-0"*SOCqT{ wcO^-Nt^Ot*M"*6JOffiMT-^■^OSI-^^-COOC«ON^OCOO©CnClM<-^(^^>-l^OCOOO^-^OOOSOl^I>^-D^rH1-^oo fflC0t^iHC0C0«i0®O'H»0O0STjf"0S'-< "3C)-*'-H.-*TiiOClMiraT}iOCOCOCD-"* tJI OO COCON O ■* O0>Ob-®'^C0iOi00»>HC0r-00N0)I>-0001t--000SCSIC0»0rHr-ftNIC00ieDasC0e0M(NC0t^©O'^eDC>O'*»0'-i COW3>C'*OrHO«^CS|0"3N»0«WOiOCOOOOSNi-H03'-Hr-CD(OOOr*i-iOOMCO'*C»M»OCOOOO«b-0'*M iH .-H M CO to T-i 0> 0> •* b- lO t*0 iH rH OlM ^ Oin m« t}( Oi rH OS O N O) O 00 OS Cq (©CJ coo t-- CO »-i 00 1> t- 1- CO OS CD C0N.-ll>i0'HOtD00'^»0«Ob-«D-«4O'-i«'H01MM C4NO'-CNOiMNOSOJCOCOTt< 00 ■* CD »0 -i (D t-i lO-^iN t- •'I* pH i-HO ■^'i-Ht-COOO»0'OOt-'^I>COeOOOSCOO»ntDC>400SCqOONWOO'^0>000»0 O'O "H "5 ^- ifJ .H lO bl .H CO i-H -^ CO W OS OS ■^ b- © CO OS •-^ CO « Til O O --H »0 lO tP >0 CO i-i N O ■^ OS tP 15 CO -^ COl--'^COMONCOi-( IN OOOSCOOi-iWTjM-^OSCOO^CO CO MOSWt- C4^ .-HrH«3 .-H 25 0:5 « IK CO m S-2i.2i P ^ o'^MMTtiiofflr-ooo50^«eo-*ioffl!--oomo;-;««3;'5cDooioNio 62 [Extract from the Report for the years 1907 and 1908.] ADVISORY WORK OF THE BOARD. The advisory work of the board provided for in subdivisions 1 and 2 of section 150, of Act No. 281, hereinbefore referred to, and which has been set forth in a general way in former reports, has been coiitiuned in all the various forms mentioned in such i-eports. MORTGAGE CREDITS PROM OTHER STATES. In the matter of collecting •and distributing to assessing officers evi- dence on which to base credit assessments, the board has during tlie past two years extended its investigations into the states of New York, Ohio, Indiana, Wisconsin, Minnesota and slightly in Iowa. The method pursued has been by a personal examination of the recorded mortgages and land contracts, etc., in the various counties visited. A transcript was taken from the records of each undischarged mortgage or land con- tract, where the mortgagee or vendor was a resident o'f Michigan. This transcript included the names of mortgagor and mortgagee, resi- dence of each, county, liber and page where instrument was recorded, and consideration or face value of the credit. These were then classified and arranged according to the assessing district in this State, where the va- rious owners resided, and the information forwarded to the proper as- sessing oflScer. The counties visited were mostly those adjoining this State in each of the different states mentioned. The following table will show the total face value of such credits owned by residents of Michigan, and recorded in the counties indicated: OHIO. Lucas Co 1202,223 Fulton Co 253,646 Williams Co 85,076 Henry Co. 10,000 INDIANA. De Klab Oo 11,475 La Grange Oo 110,005 Steuben Co 108,699 Noble Co 34,294 Elkhart Go 180^261 St. Joseph Oo ■ 448,507 Porter Co 13,565 La Porte Co 56,080 I^ake Co 5 278 63 WISCONSIN. Milwaukee Co 944,704 Douglas Oo. '. 12,716 Iron Co 39'660 Ashlaud Co. 20,074 Florence Co 41,927 Racine Co 10,122 Marinette Co 114,531 Brown Co ." 18,000 Oconto Co , 34,281 Outagamie Co 13,100 MINNESOTA. St. Louis Co 252,034 IOWA. Pottawattamie Co 32,572 NEW YOEK. Erie Co 109,656 Total 13,173,486 The amount of .$32,572 credited to Pottawattamie county, Iowa, was obtained through correspondence. An attempt was made to secure the same kind of information from Cook county, Illinois, which contains the city of Chicago, but this was found to be impossible from^ the fact that the forms in use there are in the nature of trust deeds, the trustee named not being the actual owner and acting either as an agent or only a convenient friend for the pur- pose of concealing the real owner of the credit. The amount of taxes that have accrued to the State and its various municipalities, by reason of these investigations has repaid many times over the cost of obtaining the information. MORTGAGE CREDITS OWNED AND RECORDED IX THE STATE. The plan of securing information concerning this class of credits, evi- dence of which is recorded within the State, and placing the same in the hands of local assessing oificers, has been extended and systematized un- til the board believes it is in a position to give with accuracy the status of mortgage credit taxation in the State at the present time. The accuracy attained in this branch of advisory work has involved a great amount of experimental and detail labor. In October, 1899, steps were taken by the members of the first Board of State Tax Commissioners to secure from the ofliice of the register of deeds in each county of the State a record of all undischarged mortgages ; such transcript to contain county where recorded, liber and page of record, date of mortgage, name of mortgagor and residence, name of 64 mortgagee and residence, amount of mortgage, if one of more assign- ments had been made, the name and residence of assignees. A blank form was provided for this purpose. A classification by coun- ties of the residence of the mortgagees or assignees was then made and these were subdivided into assessment districts. In the spring of 1900 the form slips of all assessable mortgage credits were sent to the assessors and supervisors of the various cities and townships of the State, together with a letter explaining how the infor- mation had been obtained and what it represented, namely, the face value of each mortgage at the date of record, and that they were to be used as a guide in making assessments of personal property of this class. * Supervisors were requested to return these slips, after their respective rolls had been passed upon by the board of review, with notations show- ing the assessment made against the mortgagee or assignee named on such slips, and if not assessed at all or for less than face value, the rea- .son therefor. The result of the first year's work disclosed, first, that in taking a record of all mortgages in the State the board was burdening itself with a large amount of work that was of no benefit except as a matter of mere statistical information, /htch was the classification of mortgage credits that were not assessable under the present laws of the Stale, being those owned by organize! banks, insurance companies, non-resi- dents of the State, colleges, building and loan assocations, trust com- panies and some classes of charitable, fraternal or other educational or- ganizations. In the year 1901 the plan was changed and the registers of deeds were required to report only such mortgages as the records in- dicated were owned by residents of the State, and they were also required to furnish a transcript of all discharges and assignments recorded during the year, where the owner of the credit was a resident of the ssfate. The experience of the board and the assessing officers was that infor- mation given by persons liable to assessment, as to the fact of a mortgage having been discharged, was not always reliable. Tht^ plan w is then adopted of classifying this information by throwing out such mortgages as were shown by the records to have been discharged during the year, and by giving the owner credit for such partial payments as were re- corded by assessing officers to have been made subseqiient to the n ite of the mortgage. The results of this new classification were then compiled on blanks showing the name of parties, residence of owner of credit, umoimt un- paid, being either the sum disclosed by record or such balance as remain- ed after deductions mentioned above had been made, also a column indi- cating amount assessable for current year, and one for such explanations as might be necessary, where the credit was not assessed at all or for less than face value. These blanks filled out as described were sent to assessing oflScers, in place of slips, as in years previous. The original record of each mortgage was retained in our ofQce. The returns made bv supervisors and assessors on the blanks men- tioned were more complete and reliable than those made by former plans, and the latter method is in force at the present time. The original records are now kept by the card system, and the history and status of each mortgage credit assessable in the State is as nearly accurate as possible 65 in dealing witli 125,000 separate cards each year, many of which are handled several times over. The following table shows by counties, for the year 1907, the result of the classification and compilation referred to. Column 1, "Face Value," includes the amount unpaid or still due on mortgages recorded previous to April, 1906, and, the consideration stated in the instrument, of those recorded between April, 1906, and April, 1907; column 2, "Dis- charged or Part Paid," indicates the amounts deducted from column 1 for these two reasons, for the year ending April, 1907; column 3, "Offset by Indebtedness," indicates sums unassessed by reason of irldebtedness on part of owners to such amounts, the law allowing an offset of debits against credits to the extent of bona fide indebtedness; column 4, "As- signed or Eemoved to Other Assessing Districts," shows the amounts involved by a change of ownership to persons outside the assessing dis- trict from which the original holder lived, but still held and assessable in the State, or a change of r^idence by owner of credit ; column 5, shows amounts involved by removal from the State of owner during year pre- vious to the second Monday in April, also change of ownership from per- sons within the State to those without the State during the same period. In column 6 is found the amount belonging, supposedly, to residents of the State, which persons neither this board nor the local assessing oflBcers are able to locate. Column 7, ''Not Assessable," are amounts which are returned to this board by local assessing officers as not subject to assessment for various reasons, among which are exemptions by reason of poverty, where the apparent owner is the officer of some organized -bank or building and loan association, which is the actual owner of the credit; mortgages given as security for indorsement of notes or to secure the performance of some contract. Column 8, "Not Assessed," shows those amounts not appearing on the assessment rolls, but for which assessing officers giye no explanation. Column 9, shows by counties the aggregate amount of mortgage credits actually on the assessment rolls as reported by the local assessing officers of the State, also total amount for the entire State. In column 10 is found the taxes levied in each county, upon amounts assessed as mort- gage credits for that county, also total of taxes levied for entire State. The Board of Assessors of the City of Detroit has in use a plan .some- what similar to that used by our board, in relation to mortgage credits, and only reports to us the amounts actually assessed. The amount report- ed by them for 1907, as assessed, was |3,157,400, which, added to the ag- gregate amount of the State, outside of that city, gives |4o,942,320 as the total aggregate amount of mortgage and land contract credits assessed for the year 190T. In classification and compilation, land contracts have been treated as mortgage credits, as they fall within the same class of personal property. The sum of |8,449,227, being total of column 8, returned by local officers as "Not Assessed," and without explanation, is one item that should not appear in a table of this kind. Supervisors and assessors can very readily report the disposition and reason therefor of each item submitted to them; that this has not been done, notwithstanding our repeated efforts to secure complete information on this question, is the only reason for such a column appearing in this compilation. 9 66 •jt^unoa aqij JOj nDii« -xv% JO 9^0 J aSu -IdAV %'3 *p38S9S -sv BaS^Sijioni Xq paonpojd igx •AvaiAa'jj JO piBog Aq pa^i OO -* "X) t^ lOCO »OO>eD00>flO5OiO> ,_itOCO«001CQT-llO-^CCU3i-tOU3 ^ r-l ^-1 O ncQknu30 i-T -* 00 CO CTCOCO Ot-C* coo t-oo *HC0U3O>i-lC^COqQO>00-t}m^U30DC4 OJ O .-H O -^(C .t- OO 1-1 1«^ »0 O 00 tH i-dOCOO'^dOlOOOSNCOOOCSm o ,-1 o "* .-( 00 M OT e- CO t- »o o CO ci)C4ooe>a30o ^rH(NWcocoi>eo-^iOcp'*0 "O COM coocot- o-^j(cD"*coin(No>;^;He3'*eDT-f (Ni-H^^HO>COtOCOCOI>COiO^ Og >0 94 1-H CO QQ T-t Cflt-lOiHCq OC^CDOaCOCDtOOmCQONT-HT- 'J0SU.J3 -dns Xp passsssy c>qc>4ooeqt»coo^o>c4t~a>coo 0>-^if3COCOCO^,— iWtOCCUSt^ ODi-ltOO^COC<)C4U300U30t<. O ■* CO CO Nxft CD OS ■* T-H Cfl -* i-l »H 10^00T-C3MO00i-hOi-(OCT oo-55oii-(coo-!f cooicocoN-^oo (» ^ csi t- »o coot: fa ">- 3352^°° OOOWit-OiO'^NlOOQNCCOOOO ,H0»C0»0O.-('*OC0l^000)CC|iO oor-C4coo^ir«^^cooou3a3 i-iQOooiotnesoot~t«^HCoiQ ^ " — ^s Th CO o-^i cot^mc^to-^uaciic ■passassB i^o^ cooJwacoQOiooacoD-Moooouj-* ff»''^"*t-cDT-ieoEiS29'5'^'*31 «^ _i cq t« 03 1-H i-i i-H oa 1— I c>i C4 C4ncoei-(0 t-tec (N eooq co '3iq«3SaflffB!),ofj; eoocDococ-COOO Ot-i-HlOU3t- i-H oo ua CO CO CO ■*ou5r-oo» aoN^H•-H>o^u^c^coco^•cD'^ c^oosoc^usootMcoosoO'^ a3 0CDOOO>C40t~OOOc003-^0> (NC0-^00l>-0»e0^^l>I>-OTHC9 TlH o> « 0> 0> ^ CO 1> I> OS "5 1-H CO CO N m >0 Cfl lO t- >0 1-t N OS .-H 0» "W osos»ocoo"*«nt^mmcocDo C0TllCS)OSrHOSC0C4OSQ0>O^CC 00CDt-OSiHe4COI>tOU3^O>i- •paij^ooi r^o^ JO ^no paAora -81 10 panSissy t-T-lOMOO00»OC t^ocooot^iot-^ ••JfOCOCJOsNOSO CO00Mi-l'<* CO O)^^^coo^« tH lO CO ■>*< O C. CO t- ■* r^ o CO esu^9sooooosc4 0■>-u;^^H^^ooo coiooos^nocootMcoiMosiH -. t-">*TjHOOeO0SO>«O»00C0O«« i-Hi-HOCOt-oqOCDCOWOO-^tHO eq W CO W3 O CO C- O »C M t^ CO t^ CC lO »0 ■<*< OS OS CO O ■^OSioOSC-NCO-^^t-ICOCOO Hir-ocDor-t- - C- i-( CO 1-1 ITS i-H 1-lNl-t TjtOOiO U3r-lC>4 T((oocDr-coo OO^tl-MOSCD OSCCOCS) -^M ,-1 1-H (M i-H CD oooooqoo^H i> oo U3 ri CO es) CD CO oa CD i>- ■* oQOGoeqoo O0«S'-iH JO p'aSiBqoBtQ i-HCOCOUSt-COCOCOOOOO-^OOCDTtH Oiow3.-(r-»oeo-#co"faCTO»OTt< t-t^cot-coocsscqosTjfwcouaco os^i-HCOr-it^oas-^oom^eocD oouaosio^t-osr^oo'^u^iooco oo(^^NcDo^^-oe^scDNOl int~t~C4i-i0^c4e^coos*« CDCOOOODi-lCOCOcOU3e4*-IC' eq m CO co'C4 'd^cqcococo^cotno ^NOOtH-'* e^ ,_. -TjH rH 00 .-( 00 CO CO 00 ■* 1-1 i-t t- 1-1 OO OS tH 00 -^ t> O O CO OS oa CO 1-4 CO '^ CO 94 O i-l-^lQOO CO i-lT-lr-lrHCOCc»cO"*':*Oos-*"*oo Wr-lOSlO-^COt^QOOrf-^-^C-It^ cDcoQO-*:^Ni*4it > 67 I3i»ft«{» Tjl C i-l Ci CO o o> ^so ,-1 coos OOl"*-*-!** io lo cc 00 »o m W3 tr- OS >o 00 1- Or-tC4C4U3OU300M0Q<-ia0030S ocooor-osco^H.-HOc^-^»o^HT-t 3CO^^O>OCO0C^t^O> OOb-OQosOU30Si-t-*i4eoa»o ^— '"^^00»3iOrHO«DC0I>-«0 SSE HOs-^t-^DcOiONt-^HCCOai-im o^o^-eO'-(,-lOo»f^oo>^-o OOTP"*COQpNevsr-5D «0 OOCO CO CO t^ ,-H OO CO CS 00 OO t« -^ CO T r4COC>1kOOiOOOC<)Op^OOOSOS cooot:-a>coi-H.-igpMonoT-H^ «WSOtDC0i-l000>T-l.-l'*-*0) ■^O001r-W5CO Si-li*HO0ODl:^TtH(NOO^ co CO OO A OS C^ OO j< to l> CO C4 O^ 00 d ^ C4 OO 00 C)i-4co_4T-HC«|iooo -iTj so-* H lo -* o5 OS >o jg H O 00 '^ 00 1^ «0 OS ■* OS OO CO osoo CO ■* o CO e«i CO OS (M OS CD OS CCS CO C4 i-tOi— It-0t0t~03 0c0 0i0 gpkOOscDosos ■* o lo U5 CO N 1-H OS CO t- cq )M OcOOOC^dOS t-H CO 1-H O N CO OS OS ■* ■* .-I t^ r--* t»ocoooc t-i-4 COC^-*iOOO eqcD -^oscoiocqc I CO ■ O O t~ CO O OO pO OS ■4le4coosaaoco>E}4^-iooos^u3 OSiOlOOOC^lOOCOCOOCOOkO ■*COOOOOO>-l »OCOt».^HOO.-l »-HCOlO.-I^Tt"OS^HOSC-^-* eoeocoo.coot-osio'^c*'* M^i-H^^t^OSCTOS^KiOlO-* lOOOO - -^J* 1-H N O lO »0 a t— ^OSOs -^OOOSOiqtAcc CD-* OS OS C4CO0i "* CO O ■* i-H lO lO CDOOlO OOOOOt-^HOSCO COOOCOOQOOSO-»Jt 1-) coc0-*OS^- S«o o CO r— i-H t- CO ^H OS ■* -* oq C4 OD ^ t> C4 OS CO CD T-H ^ CO OS T-HCOtOOOSC4COOCOCOlO^ eoco^,-ios>oioiooou30cooo c.C0^C0^ lOCOt^.Ti4 O Ot* ,-HT-HCq Mi-HCO iH cqt-i C4 os-*t-r«cootoooegi>-^QO^ ^CO ^iOrHOO^C4>00 KoooS' JScStP' ocDuacofr-ooosMco u5cot-r-u3cor-i-(^-tT-Hoe.-aflOTW3OCDC000.-H t- 1- r- oo •* OS OS i-H -* r- ^-i ^ a eoosooOMi-iooiooseoiF" t---*Owa'-tO>OOSOTTt< Swr-t-t-ooost-o^^ot--co "*mT-HCDa>-*0)^Oi-ioefl OSOSCONOOCSCOOOt^i-lOOlOO eOi- COIO-* «U30COCqiJlt».0>0-*cOiOCO i-INt^OS lO rt< ■* (N W "* M OOO OMt- ji-^oo-*eg^Oi-(Oio g-^OCCC-OOOO.— iC— CO lOWCOOiO-^COCfl ^,-(^^^COt-1 ;lil§.-5 ml , Jlllif I iilllii II isssigssg ajgg gills Sag fi& 3 §•§ ss 68 MORTGAGE CREDIT ASSESSMENT, 1901 TO 1907, INCLUSIVE. The following table shows by counties the assessed valuation of mort- gage and land contract credits from 1901 to 1907, inclusive. The fluctua- tions in amounts assessed in the various counties from year to year can be accounted for in different ways, such as removal of owners from State, distribution of estates of owners to heirs and legatees without the State, payment of indebtedness and investment in different classes of property ; and last,, but not least, the convenient assignment of such credits to per- sons residing without the state, for the express purpose of evading taxa- tion, or recording the instrument in the name of a non-resident and im- mediately taking an assignment back to the actual resident owner, which assignment does not appear of record until the mortgage is discharged. In view of the extent to which these subterfuges are used for the pur- pose of escaping taxation, we would recommend an amendment to the law providing, under proper penalty, that all evidences of credits se- cured by a lien on real estate, shall recite the name of iona fide owner of the same and his actual domicile. 69 Mortgage credits assessed, 1901-1901 County. 1901. 1902. 1903. 1904. 1905. 1906. 1907. Alcona $9,581 4,450 1,531,965 108,665 45,466 32,217 19,318 714,161 888,313 50,692 1,568,198 1,103,561 1,639,277 759,309 24,175 96,962 379,033 26,440 1,243,899 12,891 313,696 37,299 1,321,844 284,828 1,850,991 46,128 2,760 403,338 376,079 1,119,299 612,328 608,042 1,165,537 1,439,703 18,595 1,600 98,810 1,995,787 1,098,116 42,881 4,118,916 1,125 16,488 784,312 183,717 1,720,961 1,351,876 7,103 19,060 2,042,800 328,296 341,026 240,899 116,875 196,595 87,922 36,044 1,240,822 560,622 2,829 185,438 203,171 2,734,210 179,803 42,178 $18,827 8,840 1,441,269 87,026 19,070 26,560 32,963 675,569 683,121 44,030 1,639,229 1,293,438 1,712,133 728,392 31,304 78,440 305,921 24,485 1,275,877 17,408 231,545 32,122 1,318,446 285,309 1,830,609 49,432 18,715 381,431 400,671 1,045,151 810,880 547,711 1,214,851 1,404,025 18,892 9,100 114,827 1,924,931 1,094,222 30,949 6,819,692 1,125 16,438 843,766 172,957 1,636,682 1,263,286 7,658 13,705 1,953,337 371,513 264,787 178,997 91,632 183,641 93,722 38,868 1,204,923 459,743 6,369 428,228 185,664 2,190,463 178,468 27,285 $14,857 5,430 1,452,691 105,789 27,209 30,782 7,751 709,150 526,673 44,494 1,449,502 1,296,610 1,511,261 717,962 84,069 66,887 325,412 23,023 1,324,060 16,137 253,545 40,213 1,251,635 208,750 1,745,429 54,570 23,414 298,316 397.033 1,136,987 7\3,320 542,072 1,145,666 1,409,136 17,463 4,576 124,071 1,832,210 1,099,077 21,269 6,828,939 1,000 14,646 796,723 176,666 1,566,732 1,306,515 9,605 19,388 2,063,318 307,426 263,399 167,825 82,706 126,834 100,586 51 ,701 1,160,288 451,088 ■ 4,788 266,852 182,119 2,302,681 185,116 23,732 $6,929 8,409 1,397,399 77,291 66,815 41,924 22,140 730,903 561,648 52,415 1,370,726 1,279,474 1,618,466 618,418 70,606 55,111 273,775 19,840 1,394,506 15,240 173,910 57,973 1,363,267 266,432 1,823,656 39,659 21,409 255,085 383,343 1,150,909 666,878 552,407 1,071,969 1,384,547 10,892 1,885 152,571 1,754,433 1,255,322 30,277 5,462,440 1,000 11,729 756,820 185,047 1,566,897 1,304,169 22,694 13,850 1,747,282 291 ,270 255,758 145,024 94,641 184,564 96,645 37,387 1,262,812 472,392 7,875 243,692 174,761 2,239,717 226,624 29,083 $14,122 6,392 1,302,779 39,542 43,852 33,417 2,430 666,443 406,351 1,134 1,359,630 1,097,179 1,491,791 664,030 64,478 25,164 164,962 20,485 1,418,404 16,341 185,197 37,397 1,407,027 186,769 1J96,274 27,858 18,303 174,470 348,931 1,083,950 541,205 522,866 989,739 1,396,978 11,733 3,676 161,616 1,637,248 1,264,788 23,300 3,890,283 1,325 11,076 703,634 135,898 1,467,303 1,247,731 14,347 10,679 1,728,803 262,869 247,105 133,702 101 ,652 141,869 88,687 36,176 1,250,044 463,916 4,167 227,993 159,491 2,082,392 187,815 6,983 $2,870 16,759 1,237,436 33,599 37,045 42,839 36,921 664,844 302,648 42,982 1,424,010 1,080,064 1,424,013 685,694 56,334 29,570 199,279 15,122 1,435,386 17,674 172,831 27,170 1,348,605 226,590 1,653,968 29,044 10,288 191,132 411,849 1,107,450 532,919 470,980 929,345 1,281,337 19,828 1,997 155,488 1,627,429 1,322,527 25,081 5,464,964 $5,291 Alger 17,080 Allegan 1,017,194 24,000 Antrim 34,438 37.687 39,799 Barry 675,884 Bay 260,149 47,796 1,351,541 1,031,050 Calhoun 1,349,883 706,121 50,010 14,152 186,036 14,404 Clinton 1,413,149 15,826 112,294 Dickinson 19,980 1,304,795 171,323 1,502,730 14,682 16,026 181,661 Gratiot 382,892 1,051,792 429,658 411 ,882 969,467 1,286,938 15,209 3,219 Isabella 123,122 1,477,367 1,353,569 Kalkaska 16,056 5,121,770 Keweenaw Lake - 1,000 10,066 572,304 126,843 1,539,421 1,351,576 22,552 12,808 1,624,927 261 ,150 219,203 106,406 98,633 130,682 74,302 33,790 1,258,757 391 ,285 6,666 238,444 149,574 2,090,334 196,364 23,171 9,231 69^,582 107,072 1,576,696 1,233,330 15,115 12,518 1,587,203 251,128 203,641 99,458 71 ,419 209,919 60,644 20,318 1,184,140 434,982 3,085 248,673 122,646 Oakland 177,786 16,909 70 Mortgage credits assessed, 1901-1907.- — Concluded. ■ County. 1901. 1902. 1903. 1904. 1905. 1906. 1907. Ontonagon,, Osceola Oscoda Ottawa Presque Isle., Roscommon.. Saginaw Sanilac Schoolcraft . . Shia St. Clair... St. Joseph . Tuscola . . . Van Buren.. "Washtenaw . "Wayne "Wexford t625 152,210 2,678 19,406 1,012,165 46,939 50 1,329,912 467,007 15,670 1,072,219 *663,424 758,322 601 ,666 887,063 2,680,078 5,624,948 87,433 $19,433 145,815 1,252 17,538 1,062,313 38,190 450 1,301,903 382,438 36,647 962,640 *566,008 846,228 611,523 918,734 2,580,005 6,666,308 85,350 $39,906 156,637 940 17,895 ,191,908 68,435 $59,584 131,179 725 22,698 1,333,626 71,121 1,167,191 360,304 21,693 ■ 960,180 763,602 814,123 621,011 853,354 2,377,347 4,580,790 81,040 700,265 342,846 12,692 ,021,385 793,675 744,207 619,813 2,949,636 4,144,877 82,607 $66,666 115,401 630 24,591 1,234,359 94,071 1,178 980,481 255,529 20,449 827,778 647,533 • 666,430 503,183 945,455 2,080,742 3,722,688 72,934, $3,550 109,485 1,140 14,442 1,078,541 76,122 2,368 894,951 322,812 16,177 805,292 730,057 858,067 475,160 837,185 1,931,765 3,681,867 73,289 $106,062 912 8,536 993,167 63,440 3,130 697,677 251,628 18,859 816,370 726,505 878,109 398,041 827,674 1,854,363 4,354,129 64,630 Total $56,250,106 $56,681,305 $53,583,626 $52,762,931 $47,514,678 $48,144,334 $46,684,549 *No report for Port Huron City. ANOTHER PHASE OF CREDIT TAXATION. The question of taxation of credits is by no means confined to those represented by mortgages and land contracts. Open accounts, promissory notes, chattel mortgages, bank deposits and various classes of bonds form a considerable part of the taxable property of the State. An examination of all the assessment rolls in twenty-one counties of the state has been made for the purpose of classifying the different kinds of personal property assessed. This investigation was conducted by means of personal interviews with each assessing oflScer in the coun- ties visited. Where sworn statements were used, the division was made as found in the same. If no sworn statements were available, the per- sonal knowledge of the supervisor was taken and in every case the as- sessment roll was thoroughly examined. A table has been prepared" and is submitted, showing the result of this examination as applied to credit assessments. Column 1, sho"sving the amount of mortgage and land contract credits assessed; column 2, the amount of other credits in which is included every form of credit not secured by a lien on real estate, except bank deposits; column 3, the amount of bank deposits assessed, and column 4, the total amount represented by savings or certificate of deposit ac- counts in organized banks doing business in the counties examined; column 5, shows the assessed valuation of all personal property in same counties. The twenty-one counties examined are one-fourth in number and rep- resent about fifty per cent of assessed value of personal for the wliole state. An examination of the table discloses that the sum assessed as other credits, namely, |16,102,535 represented 8.9 per cent of assessed valuation of personal in counties named in table. The 17,294,875 assessed as bank deposits, is 4.05 per cent of assessed 71 value of same class of property in the twenty-one counties. This item, 17,294,875 is also but 8 per cent of the total amount of interest bearing deposits in the same twenty-one counties. The state and national banks located in these same counties had on deposit at the time this compilation was made approximately 170,000,000 of deposits, which were not taken into account, they bring what is known as commercial de]X)sits, and are subject to check daily, and owned largely by merchants and industrial firms and corporations. The experience of the board has shown that but a very small portion of such deposits are subject to assessment, being in nearly every in- stance offset by indebtedness. The amount submitted in column 3 as "Deposits Assessed," includes not only interest bearing deposits, but those subject to check, it being impossible to distinguish between the two on assessment rolls. Deposits in private banks are not included in column 4, the date not being sufficiently complete on which to base an accurate calculation. They would probably exceed $15,000,000. A summary based on the known assessment of mortgage and lanfl contract credits, and an examination in the twenty-one counties re- ferred to shows : Assessed value of mortgage credits in State. .. .|48,144,334 Assessed value of bank deposits in State, not including private banks 14,413,682 Assessed value of other credits, except bank deposits, in State 31,672,314 Total of all credits assessed in state, $94,230,330 Per cent of credit assessments to assessed value of person- al property in State, 26.5 per cent. Per cent of assessed value of bank deposits represented by savings and certificates of deposits accounts to {otal of such deposits in State, 8.06 per cent. The board knows of no method by which even an approximate cash valuation could be determined of what has been denominated "Other Credits," in the table which follows. The report of the State Banking Commissioner, made two months previous to the time of assessment, for the year in which the investiga- tion herein detailed was made shows: The total amount in the State of the class of deposits used in this compilation to have been, in round numbers, |155,005,719, and of these only |14,413,682 were assessed. The board, in the fall of 1899, secured from the assessing officers of the State reports as to the amount of credit assessments then on the rolls. The sum reported was |20,000,000. This amount has been in- creased, as we have indicated, to |94,230,330, on which taxes are being paid to exceed .$1,500,000 yearly. This information. the board has deemed important, in view of the agitation concerning the question of credit as- sessments in the two preceding Legislatures, and the probability that the matter will come before the Legislature of 1909. 72 Credit assessment in SI counties. County. Mortgage and land contracts credits assessed. Other credits except bank deposits. Bank deposits Bank deposits bearing interest. Assessed value all personal property. Clare Genesee Isabella Jackson Kalamazoo . Lake Macomb . . . Manistee . • . Mason Mecosta Monroe . . . .. Muskegon . . Newaygo . . Oakland . . . Oceana . . . . Osceola Saginaw . . . St. Clair... Washtenaw Wayne .... Wexford . . . Total . . $15,122 1,653,968 155.488 1,527,429 1,322,527 10.066 1 ,624.927 261,150 106,406 98,633 1.258,757 238,444 149,574 2,090,334 196,364 109,485 894,951 730,057 1,931,755 3,681.867 73,289 $422,586 - 11,113 525,883 481 ,219 501 ,193 526,808 34,849 178,903 317,751 13,301 502,751 30,435 32,750 470,704 509,500 947,433 10,595,356 $100 376,347 17,780 401 ,970 587,210 1,490 178,764 255,659 98,900 4,915 177,242 53,140 12,690 432,715 20,975 32,030 335,487 113,380 415,869 3,761,897 16,325 $129,226 13,072,190 359,066 3,477,507 3,631,454 2,613,118 843,892 839,649 262,422_ 548,633 1,768,854 88,003 3,111,151 171,770 601,777 2,152,382 2,807,295 6,263,000 57,660,450 709,270 $257,378 6,445,187 962,355 7,503,550 9,169,280 125,381 4,824,957 3,422,596 1,246,872 658,401 2,936,675 3,896,600 716,760 7,979,015 910,220 10,699,408 6,486,131 7,993,886 101,058,428 1,617,291 $18,130,593 $16,102,535 $7,294,875 $90,067,217 $179,780,694 MORTGAGE CREDITS RECORDED, 1907. The board has, for the further information of your Excellency and the Legislature, secured from the offices of the registers of deeds a transcript of each mortgage and land contract recorded in the State during the year 1907. In securing this information every liber in use during the year stated has been examined, and the page where record is found noted. The data thus secured has been classified and arranged under the following heads: First, All mortgages assessable under our present laws, their owners being persons, Anns, corporations or associations residing or having a principal place of business within this state; Second, Those belonging to non-residents of the State, whether per- sons, firms or corporations, except insurance companies, which are classified by themselves, as such corporations now pay a specific tax ; Third, Mortgages owned by State, national banks and trust com- panies, organized under the laws of the State and not subject to taxa- tion as such under the law. Mortgages owned by private banks are included in the class of resident owners, they being assessable under that classification ; Fourth, Mortgages given to secure bond issues and held by trustees for the benefit of bondholders; such mortgages as bear no interest and become due only upon the contingency of failure to comply with the condition of the bond or bonds tliey are given to secure. These do not represent an actual commercial credit, and are not subject to taxation. Bonds they are given to secure are taxable; also mortgages given to trustees to secure creditors under certain stipulations; Fifth, Mortgages held by building and loan companies or associations, which are expressly exempt from any kind of taxation ; 73 Sixth, "Other nonassessable mortgages." Included in this class are mortgages owned by benevolent, charitable, educational, scientific and fraternal institutions, exempted by law; those given to secure the per- formance of some contract and which have no commercial value unless the contract is forfeited ; those given as additional security for loans al- ready made and secured in other mortgages. As bearing upon the significance of the proposed amendment to the law relative to the recording of mortgages, the board desires to call at- tention to the amount of mortgages assessed in the most populous and wealthy centers of the State, as compared with the amount assessed for this class of credits in less populous and wealthy counties. Reference to the table on a previous page discloses that in 1907, there were assessed in each of seventeen counties of the State, exclusive of Wayne and Kent, mortgage credits in ^excess of S1,000,000, aggre- gating $23,598,900. The total assessed value of personal property in these counties was |96,374,5o7, or 24.4 per cent. The counties of Wayne and Kent which contain the two wealthiest cities in the State, with an assessed valuation of |139,548,242 in per- sonal, have assessed mortgage credits of |9,475,899, or 6.9 per cent. In such centers the. volume of business is much larger, both in the aggregate and in specific transactions, and, with very few exceptions, the large individual items of mortgage credits appear to be owned by non-residents. Another interesting comparison is the resident and non-resident mort- gages recorded in 1907, in the counties of Wayne and Kent with those in the same seventeen counties mentioned. Resident mortgages, Wayne and Kent .^2,346,7.57 Non-resident mortgages, Wayne and Kent 3,264,221 Resident mortgages in seventeen counties 7,359,034 Non-resident mortgages in seventeen counties 1,706,189 An attempt was made during the collection of data relating to mort- gages recorded in 1907, to ascertain the amount of mortgage credits on which the mortgagor bound himself to pay any taxes that might be levied as well as taxes on real estate covered by the lien. This was found not feasible, as the records containing forms ^vith a tax clause could not be relied on, to show in all cases the actual facts relating to this question. A personal investigation among mortgages in several hundred in- stances, disclosed that in quite a large per cent of cases where the mortgage form contained the "tax clause," that part of the contract was not in force: Therefore, while the records in the office of the board show every instance where a recorded instrument shows such a clause no compilation has been attempted. To secure anything like ac- curate information on this subject, would involve a personal interview with one of the parties to the transaction, of every recorded e\idence of credit in the state bearing what we call the "mortgage tax clause."' 74 Mortgages recorded during the year 1907. Countyi Resident. Non-resident Banis. Trust mortgages. Insurance mortgages. Building and loan. Non- assessable. $19,338 48,279 438,350 10,930 39,352 40,293 28,759 212,431 142,547 63,048 676,727 429,098 542,174 261,684 66,923 28,675 108,947 40,238 337,526 18,824 45,310 33,849 445,840 181,479 424,280 54,397 26,722 105,342 287,060 449,232 289,890 297,637 486,135 336,624 38,688 47,191 195,679 544,459 672,112 32,810 1,019,210 22,042 30,098 228,400 46,130 464,107 316,632 19,762 . 17,896 395,297 95,583 75,223 84,038 110,837 103,790 86,396 54,503 376,062 269,966 14,911 130,784 97,682 500,380 129,36/ 70,380 $4,301 $32,272 38,890 200,872 63,864 64,511 36,218 1,000 73,052 106,868 33,523 118,236 56,363 348,008 29,852 30,873 62,077 71,252 30.819 108,176 365 30,375 11,770 77,741 60,672 457,869 49,181 $65 Alger 86,336 696 16,790 10,569 6,699 44,473 130,117 6,533 374,761 69,179 155,120 62,014 42,910 17,765 69,290 23,195 45,045 8,355 82,059 64,199 23,335' 51,949 85,141 33,080 164,784 65,463 103,406 61,093 7,529 83,804 174,893 49,774 30,099 26,521 54,763 115,626 175,902 e,258 548.884 4,723 ,22,589 29,020 8,915 219,403 17,800 1,200 Alpena $5,000 $600 Arenac Baraga 94,619 Barry 2,650 59,754 400 86,856 2,600 2,933 2,000 1,700 3,814 31,608 2,400 Bay 40,000 $28,350 36,366 11,050 10,200 200 165,650 Cheboygan • 500,000 1,700 3,206 Clinton 4,000,000 250 Delta 7,653 2,600,000 176 Eaton 250,000 50,000 Gladwin 4,600 Grand Traverse 104,770 157,214 100,739 261,637 220,064 159,089 174,741 9,340 650 117,772 185,797 151,826 16,625 881,632 5,000 Gratiot 7,400 2,000 796,070 Hillsdale 3,200 Huron ; 41,450 169,970 16,725 Ionia Iosco .■ 500 10,126,000 600 700 352,375 303,731 3,800 432,060 400 Isabella Jackson 4,429,000 1,110,000 100,000 131,600 687 27,910 Kalkaska Kent 67,060 35,913 Keweenaw Lake 7,038 268,038 82,830 314,997 33,763 10,000 Lapeer 1,065 Leelanau .• Lenawee 600 Livingston 14,000 24,892 300,000 1,075,000 1,600,000 760,000 60,000 7,500 968 Luce Mackinac 4,100 81,020 22,374 27,343 36,204 25,361 116,798 48,049 10,198 84,486 68,842 6,167 59,149 54,509 34,400 61,359 32,920 234,335 74,797 126,244 107,343 59,165 12,060 57,419 9,305 117,991 122,178 13,268 43,270 117,220 335,100 32,796 6,079 3,500 700 Manistee Marquette Mason Mecosta 22,700 382 Menominee 1,000 Midland Monroe 100,000 11 ,000 Montcalm 285 600 960 40,000 1,200 Newaygo 4,794 4,475 6,700 2,000 Oakland 7,000 3,300 Oceana Ogemaw ■• 75 Mortgages recorded during the year 1907. — Concluded. County. Resident. Non-resident. Banks. Trust mortgages. Insurance mortgages. Building and loan. Non- assessable. $25,664 94,777 8,808 24,298 467,752 33,984 21,252 309,184 260,309 21,951 295,240 268,056 289,694 258,806 342,414 439,232 1,327,547 86,999 $19,685 14,643 9,490 12,396 68,360 16,292 2,255 94,282 110,484 3,300 34,820 174,297 61 ,972 166,594 138,733 96,937 2,715,337 20,340 $8,936 88,329 7,899 9,734 315,461 62,465 6,638 245,469 428,218 20,472 233,572 288,666 88,412 91,457 129,995 568,686 5,200,491 164,026 $125,000 $650 $530 200,000 7,022,434 500 Ottawa $18,600 7,025 9,341 3,100 450,000 126,900 3,800 Schoolcraft . .... 7,461,717 11,500 8,850 6,000 4,000 St CHair 60,666 100,000 66,170 57,625 775 41,218 St. JoBeph 4,250 4,795 "Washtenaw 12,000,000 2,248,876 3,000 7,000 739,600 14,500 177,550 3,ioa 20,250 Wayne . 279,744 Wexford Total $17,884,322 $7,843,872 $14,859,657 $56,865,138 $918,700 $2,942,502 $543,000 An examination of the preceding table discloses that the total amount of mortgages reported in the state during the year 1907 was |100,938,491. The aggregate of each classification being, Resident 17,884,323 Non-resident 7,843,872 Banks '. 14,859,657 Trust ._ 56,865,138 Insurance Companies .* 918,700 Building and Loan 2,942,502 Non-assessable 543,000 The taxes actually levied in the state for the same year on this class of credits under the ad valorem system was |746,923.95. This is equiva- lent to a specific tax of |.0073 on every dollar of recorded mortgages for the year. If we eliminate the trust mortgages, and those non-assessable, under the present law the result is $.0168 for each dollar. If trust and non-resident mortgages are not considered the rate would be |.02 for each dollar. These figures are worthy of consideration when any proposed change in the method of taxing such property is contemplated. The average face value of all classes of recorded credits for this period is |2,394.00. Total number of instruments recorded is 42,560. An investigation of the record of all discharged mortgages in five counties discloses that one thousand nine hundred eighty-seven instru- ments were discharged and the average time. each had been in force was four years, eleven months and three days. A Ifick of time accounts for the fact that this branch of the inquiry was not extended to other counties. In explanation of the average time above referred to, it is well to say that no discharged in.strument was omitted in the counties examined. The range of time such instruments were in force was from twenty-two days to thirty-nine years. Such cases as these mentioned were, of coui-se, infrequent. In a majority of cases where the instru- ment were in force to exceed fifteen years, undoubtedly full payment 76 had been made years before; but being without definite knowledge of the facts in each case, it was not deemed advisable in making the compila- tion to omit any record. PEESONAIi PROPERTY OF DECEDENTS. Another feature of the advisory work pursued by the board, is that of procuring for the use of assessing officers information concerning the personal property of decedents, whether in the hands of administra- tors, trustees or guardians, or distributed to heirs and legatees as pro- vided by law. To accomplish this, the returns made by the various judges of probate in the State of Michigan to the Auditor General are examined each year, and transcripts made of estates in which the amount of personal property has been determined by such judges. This transcript shows name and residence of decedent, name and residence of administrator, executor or trustee, value of personal property de- termined, name and residence of each person sharing in the distribution of estate and amount of each share. Inquiry is then made in various counties as to whether estates named have been distributed within the year, and, if so, date of distribution. This data is arranged according to the residence of the administrator, trustee or executor (if estate is not distributed) or person sharing in distribution if estate is closed. The information is then sent out to the proper assessing officers, as a guide and help to them in the assessment of personal proi)erty. There are, of course, classes of this property which do not come within the taxable property of the state, and the separation of the same would involve an investigation of each estate at the county of record, \\'liich the board has not the time, nor the clerical force, to attempt. An ex- planation as to how the information was obtained, and the reason therefor, is sent to each assessing officer who is instructed that it be considered only as a guide. The board believes this work has been of great benefit in the assess- ment of personal, as it places within the knowledge of many officers facts which it is quite improbable they would otherwise ascertain. This is especially true where an assessing officer resides at a distance from the county seat, and also where persons shfu^ in estates that are probated in counties outside the one in which he acts.. As an illustration of the extent of this part of the work of the board, we call attention to the table which follows, showing by counties the value as reported of this class of property for the year 1908. A not incon- siderable value of this information lies in the fact, where claim is made by the heirs or legatees that the money or security has been received but transferred into chattels or real estate, that the assessor is thereby assisted in determining the cash value of property so acquired. Alger $2,469 Allegan 69,564 Alpena 360,345 Arenac 4^022 Baraga 13^450 Barry ; 45 545 Bay 336,836 Benzie 3 138 Berrien 129,914 77 Branch |239,006 Calhoun 427,080 Cass 181,962 Cheboygan 9,353 Chippewa 150,165 Clare 4,189 Clinton 298,735 Crawford 1,734 Delta 39,123 Dickinson 83,951 Genesee 589,875 Grand Traverse 37,785 Gratiot 25,104 Hillsdale .' 95,304 Houghton 1,505,805 Huron 44,615 Ingham 248,165 Ionia 136,272 Iron 67,002 Isabella 8,451 Jackson 460,878 Kalamazoo 539,040 Kent 792,939 Lapeer 75,869 Lenawee 170,230 Livingston 13,036 Macomb 245,150 Manistee 208,691 Marquette 402,653 Mason 328,286 Mecosta 33,870 Menominee 6,157 Monroe 28,436 Montcalm 87,065 Muskegon 396,999 Oakland 409,181 Oceana 4,586 Osceola 34,307 Otsego 9,559 Ottawa 65,395 Presque Isle 3,371 Saginaw 915,669 Sanilac 17,728 Schoolcraft 82,123 Shiawassee 210,380 St. Clair 116,475 St. Joseph 56,854 Tuscola 40,007 Van Buren 126,166 Washtenaw 398,176 Wayne 10,774,566 Wexford 25,753 Total 122,238,653 78 ASSESSMENT OF BANK STOCK. An earlier. report of the then acting Board of State Tax Oommissioners discussed somewhat at length the vast inequality in the assessment of bank stock in the state. This seemed without justifiable excusej as the law directs with a very reasonable degree of accuracy how this valuation shall be determined. The capital stock, surplus, undivided profits and real estate, contain all the property which the bank as a corporation has invested in the business, and only on these items can it be assessed under the present law. Its large items of loans, discounts and other securities, except such as come from its corporate personal property, are made from its deposits, which are in reality the property of the depositors. It would seem, therefore, that the assessment of this class of property should cause the assessing officer the least of his trouble. Judging from assessment records the opposite of this has been true. The investigations of this board have shown as many as ten different bases of assessing the stock of one bank in a single county. Desirous of securing more uniform results in the assessment of bank stock throughout the state, the board has endeavored to place before the men charged with this duty informa- tion which would assist them in reaching the proper standard of equality. The necessary data upon which to base the information required was found in the oflSce of the Banking Commissioner of the State. The State banking law requires organized banks to make reports at irregular in- tervals throughout the year of their financial condition. From these re- ports, made at the nearest preceding date to the second Monday in April, is taken a copy of the amount of capital stock, surplus, undivided profits and value of real estate of all banks. This information is compiled by counties and names of banks in each county of the State, and valuations set forth as per the table that follows : Column one contains the aggregate value of the capital stock, surplus and undivided profits of each bank ; column two, valuation of real estate as shown by books of the various banks; column three, the value of per- sonal property ; column four, the total number of shares of stock into which the capital stock of each bank is divided; column five, the cash value per share of its stock, as shown by each bank's report. Subdivision 7, section 8, General Tax Law of Michigan, provides, that all shares of organized banks in the state shall be assessed at cash value, after deducting the assessed value of real property owned by and assessed as such to such banks. The items that make up the personal corporate property of a bank have already been referred to. If we subtract from the sum of these items, which is shown" in column one, the items in col- umn two we will have that amount of each bank's property which is assess- able as personal property, or the shares of stock mentioned in section 8; that is, this would be true if column two represented assessed valuation. An attempt has been made in years past to secure information as to the actual assessed value of the real estate owned by banks in the Ijtate, but the returns have been incomplete and unsatisfactory. For this rea- son, and kno-wing that no injustice would be done, the board has, in pre- paring this guide for assessors, used the book value of real estate as re- ported by the banks, in ascertaining what amount of corporate proi)ert7 should be considered as personal, and in this manner the amounts in column three have been determined. 79 The reason no inujstice has accrued to bank property through this method, is that in common with other real estate within the state, it is not assessed at cash value, as yet, notwithstanding the vast differences between the assessed valuation of the State at the present time, as com- pared with 1899; and the margin of difference between the assessed and cash value of such real estate is sufQcient under normal conditions to make up the actual losses that occur incident to the business. The items in column five, representing the value per share of the stock of each bank, are determined by dividing the amount of personal property owned by each bank by the figures in colunm four, representing the num- ber of shares into which its capital stock is divided. These items representing the value per share of stock for the year 1908, are believed by the board to be consevative cash valuations of the same. The board, not having knowledge as to the residence of different bank stock owners in the State, a statement as per the table is sent to each assessing oflScer in a county where one or more banks are located, to- gether with a statement of how the information is obtained, and instruc- tions that it is only for his assistance and not something which he is bound to accept. Unusual conditions may arise which would materially modify the figures suggested; these he is expected to deal with as with other problems which confront him. Banks owning no real estate may be able to prove that the book value does not represent actual cash value, or a bank with real estate may have has extraordinary losses during the year which would reduce the value of the stock. This is purely advisory work and assessors generally have used the information understandingly. The returns that have come to the board on the assessment of bank stock indicate that a long step forward has been taken toward securing equality in taxation of this class of personal property. 80 Book value of stock in each organized bank in the state as shown by report to Banking Commissioner, February 14, 1908. Capital stock surplus and undivided profits. Real estate owned by bank. value of stock. Number of shares. Alcona c6unty: Alcona Co. Savings Bank . Alger county: First National Bank of Alger County. Allegan county: The Allegan State Savings Bank . Citizens State Savings Bank First National Bank First State Bank First State Savings Bank Hopkins State Bank State Bank Wayland State Bank Fruit Growers State Bank Alpena county: Alpena County Savings Bank. Aipena National Bank State Savings Bank Antrim county; Antrim County Savings Bank. . Bellaire State Bank Elk Rapids. Savings Bank First State Bank Arenac county: State Bank State Savings Bank . Barry county: Delton State Bank Farmers' and Merchants' Bank. Farmers' State Bank Hastings City Bank Hastings National Bank State Savings Bank Bay county: Bay City Bank Bay County Savings Bank . Commercial Bank First National Bank Lumberman' s State Bank . . Old Second National Bank . People's Savings Bank Benzie county: Benzie County State Savings Bank . Berrien county: Benton Harbor State Bank Farmers' and Merchants' Bank . First National Bank Niles City Bank Union Banking Co Branch county; Branch County Savings Bank . . Coldwater National Bank Farmers' National Bank First National Bank Quincy State Bank — South Michigan National Bank . Union City National Bank Calhoun county: Albion National Bank . . Albion State Bank Athens State Bank Calhoun State Bank — Central National Bank. City Bank $26,943 68,468 31,474 29,110 71,715 52,495 26,178 21,874 19,057 25.032 26,861 188,550 119,123 125,218 40,942 21,049 46,339 21 ,261 27,549 21 ,027 21,489 37,983 43,988 113,646 113,697 25,799 307,763 91 ,390 155,618 236,211 58,480 115,000 65,574 25,545 72,040 204,679 44,038 61,310 71,365 78,701 146,169 66,650 79,001 47,636 339,770 71,671 61,912 64,960 20,000 27,228 273,867 88,048 $1 ,500 32,268 10,982 3,500 20,870 6,057 2,200 6,000 3,000 45,499 11,812 5,366 5,000 5,500 3,200 7,880 1,310 1,800 3,000 4,000 13,000 16,355 4,500 10,000 4,356 2,000 18,268 2,500 28,590 5,800 6,000 7,000 5,200 6,000 4,900 6,365 18.300 3,350 16,000 10,000 7,450 3,000 3,500 22,070 3,142 $25,443 36,200 20,492 25.610 50,845 46,438 26.178 19,674 13,057 25,032 23,861 143,051 107,311 125,218 35,576 16,049 40.839 18,061 19,669 19,717 19,689 34,983 39,988 100,646 97,342 21 ,299 297,763 86,994 155,618 234,211 40,212 112.500 36,985 19.745 66.040 197,679 38,838 55.310 66,465 78.701 139.804 48,350 75.651 47.636 323,770 61.671 54,462 64.960 17.000 23.728 261.797 84.906 250 600 300 240 500 500 250 200 150 200 250 850 500 1,000 200 200 350 200 200 200 200 250 370 750 500 250 1.500 500 1,000 1,000 500 1,000 500 200 500 1,250 250 500 500 500 ,000 500 500 400 ,650 500 500 500 150 200 2.000 500 81 Book value of stock in each organized bank in the state. — Continued. Capital stock surplus and undivided profits. Real estate owned by bank. value of stock. Number of shares. Assessable value of stock per share. Calhoun county— Continued. Commercial Savings (Aliion) . . . Commercial Savings (Marshall) . First National Bank First State Bank Merchants' Savings Bank Old National Bank ;. Cass county: Ffcst National Bank First State Savings Bank G. W. Jones' Exchange Bank. . . Charlevoix county: '" Charlevoix State Savings Bank . First National Bank State Bank — Cheboygan county: Cheboygjm County Savings Bank . Cheboygan State Bank First National Bank Wolverine State Savings Bank Chippewa county: Central Savings Bank. . First National Bank. . . Sault Savings Bank . . . . Clare county: Clare County Savings Bank. . State Savings Bank Clinton county: Clinton County Savings Bank . Commercial National Bank State Bank Stete Savings Bank (Elsie) State' Savings Bank (Fowler) . . State Savings Bank (Ovid) St. Johns National Bank Westphalia State Bank Delta county: Escanaba National Bank. , First National Bank State Savings Bank Dickinson county: Commercial Bank. Fffst National (Iron Mountain) . First National (Norway) Eaton county: Barber State Bank Eaton County Savings Bank. . . First National (Hiarlotte) First National (Eaton Rapids). Grand Ledge State Bank Merchants' National Bank Michigan State Bank Emmet county: . "Emmet county Savings Bank. . First National Bank * — Krst State Bank Genesee county: Citizens' Com. and Savings Bank . Commercial Savings Bank Davison State Bank Fenton State Bank First State Savings Bank Genesee County Savings Bank — National Bank Otisville State Bank People's State Bank Union Trust and Savings Bank . . . $45,925 85,936 158,315 35,135 81,146 200,287 97.628 41,030 51,681 25,821 60,260 50,497 51,646 53,013 85,398 20,659 106,371 136,100 137,194 29,306 20,163 40,616 68,632 67,630 25,750 24,920 35,744 72,328 20,000 130,242 184,362 58,390 147,760 158,875 69,190 25,537 133,418 105,923 58,882 28,899 113,933 97,838 ■35,362 122,708 73,103 ^0. 30, 29, 25, 44, 269 133, 20 35 170 $5,400 12,200 2,500 40,383 4,500 8,975 6,000 26,000 5,727 11,100 19,092 3,400 41,800 35,861 5,500 4,000 1,487 12,000 10,501 2,000 565 3,500 7,000 - 3,407 32,500 8,370 43,800 25,000 9,700 20,000 8,751 31,500 24,818 20,600 4,000 4,000 4,500 2,700 22,500 300 4,393 32,700 $40,525 85,936 146,115 32,635 40,763 200,287 93,128 32,055 45,681 25,821 34,260 44,770 51,646 41.913 66,306 17,250 106,371 94,300 101,333 i3,806 16,160 39,129 56,632 57,129 23,750 24,355 32,244 65,328 20,000 126,835 151,862 50,020 147,760 115,07'> 68,327 25,537 133,418 80,923 49,182 28,899 93,933 89,097 35,362 91,208 48,285 209,724 26,512 25.840 20,500 41,663 269,436 110,680 20,363 31,394 138,016 350 500 1,000 300 500 1,500 500 400 400 250 500 500 500 500 500 200 1,000 1,000 1,000 200 200 280 500 500 250 150 250 500 200 1,000 1,000 500 1,000 1,000 500 250 1,000 750 500 250 500 750 250 1,000 500 1,500 250 200 250 275 1,000 1,000 200 250 1,000 11 82 Book value of stock in each organized hank in the state. — Continued. Capital stock surplus and undivided profits. Real estate owned by value of stock. Number of shares. Gladwin county: State Bank — Gogebic county: First National (Bessemer) . . First National (Ironwood). . Grand Traverse county: First National Bank People's Savings Bank Traverse City State Bank . . . Gratiot county: Alma State Savings Bank. . . Commercial Savings Bank. . . Commercial State Bank First State Bank Gratiot County State Bank. . Ithaca National Bank Ithaca Savings Bank Real Estate Savings Bank. . , Hillsdale county: First National Bank First State Bank (Camden). . First State Bank (Hillsdale). Grosvenor Savings Bank .... Hillsdale Savings Bank State Bank Houghton county: Calumet State Bank (IStizens National Bank Fhst National Bank (Calumet) . First National (Hancock) First National (Lake Linden). . . First National (Laurium) Houghton National Bank Merchants* and Miners' Bank. . . South Range Bank State Savings Bank Superior Savings Bank Superior Trust Bank Huron county: Frank W. Hubbard's State Bank. , Huron C!ounty Savings Bank Pigeon State Bank '. . Sebewaing State Bank State Savings Bank Ingham county: Opital National Bank C3ity, National Bank Farmers' Bank First State and Savings Bank. . Lansing State Savings Bank. . . People's Bank "Williamston State Bank Ionia county: Belding Savings Bank Farmers' and Merchants' Bank . Lake Odessa State Bank Maynard-Allen State Bank National Bank People's Savings Bank Saranac State Bank State Savings Bank Webber State Savings Bank .... Iron county: First National Bank Iron County National Bank . $30,728 72,047 73,479 129,388 70,175 262,030 43,926 31,825 36,777 57,320 30,465 34,767 54,742 32,952 99,867 24,210 72,409 76,893 90,324 37,667 109,671 85,479 425,206 176,075 231,325 $6,000 15,149 6,240 21,488 100,000 314,750 316,228 41,978 188,871 172,061 198,377 56,605 38.026 20,496 23,524 33,631 126,355 239,630 81,218 56,944 193,271 36,838 66,035 42,179 28,846 31.910 64,968 63,643 47,448 31,939 133,580 50,466 57,205 60,396 11,386 7,500 188 10,595 6,000 1,219 8,853 'SfSOO 51,044 9,800 47,757 51,482 15,000 $24,728 56,898 67,239 129,388 48,687 162.030 43,926 20,439 36,777 49,820 30,277 24,172 48,742 31,733 91,014 24,210 67,053 76,893 84,824 37,667 58,627 75,679 377,449 124,593 216,325 50,000 500 5,000 37,500 1,961 11,453 4,500 4,641 4,000 6,900 73,173 7,000 57,623 5,643 3,000 8,575 4,700 2,000 4,000 9,500 8,000 1,500 9,901 2,566 13,737 264,750 315,728 36,978 151,371 170,100 198,377 45,152 33,526 15,855 19,524 26,731 126.355 166,457 74,218 56,944 135,648 31,195 63,035 33,604 24,146 29,910 60,968 54,143 39,448 30,439 123,679 50,466 54,629 46,659 250 500 500 1,000 600 2,000 250 250 300 300 250 250 350 160 550 200 500 500 600 250 1,000 500 2,000 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,500 300 750 1,000 1,500 300 300 200 200' 250 1,000 1,000 500 250 1,500 250 500 250 250 250 500 500 350 200 1,000 250 500 500 83 Book value of stock in each organized hank in the state. — Continued. Capital stoclc surplus and undivided profits. Real estate owned by bank. value of stock. Number of shares. value of stock per share. Isabella county: Conunercial State Bank Exchange Savings Bank .... Isabella County State Bank . Jackson county; Central State Bank Culver State Bank Fanners* Bank Farmers' and Merchants. Bank. Farmers' State (Brooklyn) Farmers' State (Concord) Jackson City Bank Jackson State Savings Bank Peoples' National Bank Union Bank Kalamazoo county: ()ity National Bank Climax Staf« Bank Farmers' State Bank First National Bank First State Bank Home Savings Bank Kalamazoo National Bank . Kalamazoo Savings Bank. . Kalamazoo Trust Bank Michigan National Bank . . . Richland State Bank Kalkaska county: Kalkaska County Savings Bank., ^ent county: City State Bank City 'Trust and Savings Bank . . Commercial Savings Bank ■ Farmers State Bank Fifth National Bank ■ Fourth National Bank Grand Rapids National Bank. . Grand Rapids Savings Bank. . . Grandville State Bank Kent County Savings Bank . . . Lowell State Bank Michigan Trust Co National City Bank . Old Natiinaf Bank People's Savings Bank Bockford State Bank So. Grand Rapids State Bank . Sparta State Bank State Bank (Caledonia) State Bank (Grand Rapids) . . . Keweenaw county: Keweenaw Savings Bank. . Lapeer county: Dryden State Bank First National Bank Lapeer Co. Savings Bank . Lapeer Savings Bank Pioneer Bank State Savings Bank Leelanau county: Leelanau Co. Savings Bank . . . Lenawee county: Addison State Savings Bank. Adrian State Savings Bank. . . Blissfield State Bank . Boies State Bank Commercial Savings Bank — Deerfield State Bank $28,225 70,944 61 ,691 71,380 34,068 40,239 20,932 26,921 35,633 399,072 161,314 163,851 320,491 240,375 18,779 26,541 175,872 32,563 174,500 323,941 130,592 162,177 234,564 18,539 24,443 26,602 134,971 116,500 22,511 139,483 626,405 661,124 240,617 20,286 342,216 30,000 491,030 818,757 .,346,298 172,537 21,244 25,932 30,580 22,271 300,996 25,000 20,569 176,227 64,933 28,214 64,801 90,989 22,817 21,054 151,305 22,674 125,742 140,060 21 ,473 $6,503 16,000 7,000 3,900 2,600 7,200 49,649 50,000 29,630 96,357 3,250 7,455 23,400 15,109 29,500 171,768 45,265 18,750 39,100 10,000 26,163 2,500 125,000 53,414 1,200 25,000 4,500 50,000 182,158 35,000 3,000 7,500 4,455 3,000 5,253 10,000 1,300 3,000 5,274 30,000 5,432 8,000 12,000 $28,225 64,441 36,591 •71,380 27,068 36,339 18,432 26,921 28,433 349,423 101,314 134,221 224,134 237,125 18,779 19,086 162,472 17,454 145,000 152,173 85,327 143,427 196,464 18,539 14,443 26,602 134,971 90,337 20,011 139,483 401 ,400 607,710 240,617 19,086 317,216 25,500 491 ,030 768,757 1,164,140 137,537 18,244 25,932 23,080 22,271 300,996 20,569 173,227 59,680 28,214 54,801 89,689 19,817 16,780 121,305 17,142 117,742 128,060 21,473 200 500 300 681.43 250 260 200 250 250 2,000 1,000 1,000 2,000 1,000 186.7 250 1,000 300 1,000 2,000 500 1,500 1,000 182.4 200 250 1,000 1,000 200 1,000 3,000 5,000 1,500 200 1,000 250 2,000 6,000 8,000 1,000 200 250 180 200 1,500 250 200 760 600 250 600 ■460 200 200 600 200 750 ,100 200 84 Book value of stock in each organized bank in the state. — Continued. Capital stock surplus and undivided profits. Real estate owned by bank. Assessable value of stock. Number of shares. Assessable value of stock per share. Lenawee county; — Continued- First National Bank Jipson-Carter State Bank Lenawee Co. Savings Bank Lilley State Bank Ousted State Bank Tecumseh State Savings Bank. . . Thompson State Bank Wakefield State Bank Walby & Clay State Bank .Livingston county: First State Savings Bank State Bank Mackinac county; First National Bank Macomb county: Armada Savings Bank ■ Citizens' National Bank Citizens' Savings Bank Macomb Co. Savings Bank Mt. Clemens Savings Bank New Haven Savings Bank Romeo Savings Bank TJllrich Savings Bank Manistee county; First National Bank Manistee Co. Savings Bank Marquette county: First National Bank (Marquette) First National Bank (Negaunee) . Marquette Co. Savings Bank. . . . Marqilette National Bank Merchants' National Bank Peninsula Bank Mason county: First National Bank Ludington State Bank State Savings Bank Mecosta county: Big Rapids Savings Bank Citizens State Bank '..< Menominee county; Bank of Stephenson Commercial Bank First National Bank Lumberman's National Bank . . . . Midland county; Commercial Savings Bank Midland Co. Savings Bank People's Savings Bank '... State Bank Monroe county: B. Dansard & Sons State Bank . , First National Bank Monroe County Bank Monroe State Savings Bank State Savings Bank Montcalm county: Commercial State Bank Edmore State Bank ^ Farmers' and Merchants' Bank . . Greenville State Bank State Bank State Savings Bank $40,413 45,599 139,107 56,842 20,136 33,735 126,788 40,724 90,637 45,536 27,735 77,203 31 ,631 61,065 78,414 50,606 161,448 29,806 73,223 186,046 158,628 63,959 259,769 159,773 130,827 141,753 163,830 106,029 136,791 77,809 29,057 32,481 68.929 242,690 170,8891 20,131 47,577 32,698 24,335 55,025 98,380 24,306 53,160 22,673 30,401 19,842 28,994 60,275 45,292 $9,000 5,711 25,000 1,371 6,045 7,500 5,000 18,000 25,620 3,700 6,000 18,000 464 33,800 2,200 6,243 32,500 26,600 43,900 40,305 51,489 37,500 20,000 15,000 40,000 10,688 5,000 10,000 1,347 17,406 11,100 12,000 6,500 20,999 10,000 10,837 9,000 7,570 2,500 5,000 1,908 4.500 4,000 3,250 $31,413 39,888 114,107 56,842 18,765 27,690 119,288 35,724 72,637 38,487 27,735 51 ,583 27,931 55,065 60,414 50,142 127,648 27,606 66,980 153,546 158,628 37,359 215,869 119,468 79,338 104,253 143,830 91,029 96,791 67,121 24,057 32,481 58,929 27,334 52,285 231,590 158,889 13,631 26,578 13,498 46,025 90,810 21,806 53,160 17,673 30,401 17,934 24,494 60,275 41,292 20,374 250 250 1,000 400 200 260 1,000 300 750 404 250 500 250 500 500 250 500 200 500 1,000 1,000 500 1,500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 500 1,000 500 155 250 500 200 650 2.000 1,000 200 250 250 200 500 500 150 500 200 250 150 250 250 250 200 85 Book value of stock in each organized bank in the stoic— Continued. Capital stock surplus and undivided profits. Real estate owned by bank. value of stock. Number of shares. value of stock per share. Montmorency county: Montmorency Co. Savings Bank. . Muskegon county: Hackley National Bank Muskegon Savings Bank National Lumberman's Bank . State Bank Union National Bank Newaygo county: First State Bank Fremont State Bank. . Grant State Bank Old State Bank Oakland county: American Savings Bank Citizens' State Bank Citizens' State and Savings Bank . First Commercial Bank First State Bank Farmers' State Bank E. Jossman State Bank - Oakland Co. Savings Bank , Orion State Bank ^ford Savingd Bank Pontiac Savings Bank Rochester Savings Bank Royal Oak Bank State Savings Bank (Rochester). . . State Savings Bank (So. Lyons) . . Oceana county: First National Bank Oceana County Savings Bank Ontonagon county: First National Bank (Ontonagon) . Krst National Bank (Rockland) . . Osceola county: Commercial Savings Bank, . Evart Savings Bank Fkst National Bank Krst State Savings Bank. . . Marion State Bank Otsego county: Graylord State Savings Bank. . Ottawa county: Coopersville State Bank First State Bank Grand Haven State Bank . .'. Holland City State Bank National Bank ". People's State Bank State Commercial and Savings Bank. , Zeeland State Bank Presque Isle County: Onaway State Banking Co Onaway State Savings Bank Presque Isle Co. Savings Bank. Roscommon county: Roscommon State Bank Saginaw county: Bank of Saginaw Chesaning State Bank Commercial National Bank People's Savings Bank Saginaw County Savings Bank. Second National Bank State Bank 121,054 208,193 73.439 168,404 26,145 139,026 24,804 30,204 22,785 46,202 53,500 22,284 20,033 141 ,450 65,778 21,009 28,500 . 61 ,403 30,912 79,011 78,685 38,308 24,000 25,203 23,488 42,069 48.357 34,697 31,137 25,000 32,186 60,978 44.267 21,700 38,116 ^,656 84,556 42,201 85,536 135.339 51,412 37,131 50,226 27,790 35,950 22,442 20,521 29,622 216,645 120,911 145,903 788,298 27,784 $1,346 52,036 24,843 38 ,'205 2,300 4,124 8,000 5,500 3,598 6,300 2,601 13.044 7,500 3,000 233 8,731 9,100 3,000 8,500 6,500 12,472 3,000 4,200 4,587 10,750 8,000 8,385 8,700 10,000 3,700 1,000 15,850 2,618 6,703 22,000 19,396 10,625 500 2,700 8,280 700 902 67,618 7,500 16,000 22,827 45,000 5,188 $19,708 166,157 48,596 130,199 23,835 134,902 16,804 24,704 19,187 39,902 53,500 19,680 20,033 128,406 58,278 18,009 28,267 52,672 21 ,812 76,011 70,186 31 ,808 24,000 12,731 20,488 37,869 43,770 23,947 23,137 16,614 23,486 50,978 40,567 20,700 22,266 22,038 55,658 35,498 63,536 135,339 32,016 26,606 49,726 26,090 29,670 21,742 19,519 791 ,008 22,122 200,646 98,084 146,903 743,298 22,596 200 1,000 500 1,000 200 1,000 200 250 600 200 200 ,000 300 200 200 500 160 250 500 250 200 260 200 300 400 250 250 260 300 500 360 200 250 200 600 300 500 1,000 500 350 350 250 250 200 200 4,000 260 1,000 600 600 5,000 200 86 Book value of slock in each organized bank in the stale. — Continued. Capital stock surplus and undivided profits. Eeal estate owned by bank. Assessable value of stock.. Number of shares. 131,296 $5,900 324,396 250 32,187 5,000 27,187 250 59,837 5,605 54,232 400 25,036 1,500 23,536 200 19,292 5,307 13,985 150 23,324 6,935 16,389 200 23,746 2,000 21,746 200 52,815 4,135 48,680 350 35,052 4,665 30,387 300 24,000 6,250 ^ 17,750 200 19,930 1,900 18,030 150 28,279 4,480 23,799 250 25,045 3,000 22,045 200 38,457 1,650 36,807 200 34,202 1,575 32,628 200 60,402 20,485 39,917 500 84,610 7,081 77,529 500 51,769 22,800 28,969 500 31,333 11,775 19,558 250 38,272 14,000 24,272 300 121,499 14,995 106,504 1,000 29,308 3,190 26,118 250 22,255 2,000 20,255 200 28,453 3,300 25,153 160 21,130 7,500 13,630 200 51,420 4,000 47,420 500 20,126 800 19,326 200 22,920 22,920 200 235,779 38,000 197,779 1,000 71,626 3,798 67,828 500 46,422 5,000 41 ,422 400 245,640 60,000 185,640 1,500 100,030 100,030 1,000 40,338 9,144 31,194 350 77,211 5,834 71,377 500 21,298 21,298 200 145,410 9,200 136,210 1,000 237,665 61,060 176,605 1,000 35,627 3,816 31,811 250 19,214 3,300 15,914 150 65,987 623 65,364 500 53,875 7,839 46,036 250 22,975 2,500 20,475 200 58,894 7,500 51,394 500 41,470 7,165 34,305 300 66,478 17,000 49,478 300 75,314 12,974 62.340 650 31 ,250 2,500 28,750 150 47,506 2.500 45,006 350 42,065 10,000 32,065 350 65,681 10,000 65,681 500 25,555 8,000 17,555 250 23,642 2,450 21,192 200 39,535 3,000 36,535 250 25,773 6,500 19,273 250 22,310 8,700 13,610 200 90,491 90,491 108,382 Soo 1,000 125,382 17,000 49,196 15,218 33,978 300 126,794 12,748 114,046 500 49,470 1,500 47,970 400 39,503 4,818 34,685 250 Sanilac county: Brown City Savings Bank Citizens' State Bank Commercial State Bank Exchange State Bank Farmers' State Bank Lexington State Bank Minden City State Bank Sa&ilac County State Bank State Bank of Caraonville State Bank of Croswell State Bank of Deckerville State Savings Bank (Marlette) . . State Bank (Sandusky) State Savings Bank (Peck) Truman Moss State Bank Schoolcraft county: First National Bank Maniatiflue Bank Shiawassee county: Citizens' State Bank Krst National Bank Old Corunna State Bank Owosso Savings Bank Shiawassee County Bank State Bank (Byron) State Bank (Perry) State Exchange Bank State Savings Bank IFnion State Bank St. Glair county; Capac Savings Bank Commercial Bank Commercial Savings Bank First National Bank First National Exchange Bank. . . German American Bank Home Savings Bank Marine Savings Bank Memphis State Bank Port Huron Savings Bank St. Clair Co. Savings Bank Yale State Bank St. Joseph county: Burr Oak State Bank Citizens' State Bank Commercial Bank Farmers' State Savings Bank First National Bank First State Bank First State Savings Bank .' . . National Bank State Bank (Mendon) " Tuscola county: Bank of Vassar Commercial Savings Bank State Savings Bank ^Caro) State Savings Bank (Gagetown) . State Savings Bank (Unionville) . State Savings Bank (Vassar) Vassar National Bank Van Buren county: Citizens' State Bank (Decatur) . . Citizens' State Bank (So. Haven) Ffrst. National Bank First State Bank (Decatur) First State Bank (So. Haven). . . . Paw Paw Savings Bank West Michigan Savings Bank — 87 Book value of stock in each organized bank in the state. — Concluded. Capital stock surplus and undivided profits. Real estate owned by bank. Assessable value of stock. Number of sliares. Assessable value of stock per share. $307,145 S61 ,316 S255,829 500 S611 66 43,767 1,800 41,957 250 167 83 20,598 3,200 17,3-9 200 86 99 134,149 31 ,000 103,149 600 206 29 41,064 3,600 37,564 250 150 26 159,420 16,000 143,420 1,000 143 42 200,618 42,000 158,618 1,000 158 62 61,316 5,000 46,316 500 92 63 61,748 19,166 42,583 400 106 46 34,664 5,000 29,664 260 118 66 108,689 25,000 83,689 500 167 38 45,508 11,000 34,608 250 138 03 66,367 51,103 15,264 500 30 53 560,856 3,750 564,606 4,000 14115 158,995 31,778 127,217 1,000 127 22 260,440 64,689 196.751 2,000 97 87 1 ,744,722 27,500 1,717,222 10,000 171 72 1,033,236 213,516 819,721 4,000 204 93 1,491,046 1,491,046 260,839 6,000 2,600 298 21 260,839 104 33 799,922 184,341 615,681 5,000 123 11 20,000 2,550 17,450 200 87 25 69,605 25,138 34,467 500 68 93 1,255,889 1,255,889 7,500 167 45 309,046 309,046 2,500 123 62 706,803 105,294 601,509 4.000 150 38 25,000 12,760 12,430 250 49 72 424,133 28,940 395,193 ' 2,500 168 08 - 928,532 2,628 926,004 7,500 123 46 32,909 10,500 22,409 250 89 64 2,720,121 10,264 2,709,857 20,000 135 49 550,768 202,084 348,684 4,000 87 17 3,239,767 959,934 2,279,833 15,000 151 99 98,380 12,234 86,146 750 114 86 29,865 12,500 17,365 250 69 46 1,069,015 1,069,015 5,000 213 80 894,728 10,883 883,845 5,000 176 77 205,960 29,480 176,470 1,500 117 65 1,694,324 165,700 1,428,624 4,000 357 15 64,212 9,400 54,812 250 219 25 105,330 32,625 72,705 500 145 01 130,711 18,500 112,211 1,000 112 21 22,082 3,000 19,082 200 95 41 90,131 37,616 52,615 750 70 15 'Washtenaw county: Ann Arbor Savings Bank Citizens' State Bank Dexter Savings Bank Farmers* and Mechanics' Bank Farmers' and Merchauts' Bank First National Bank (Ann Arbor) First National (Ypsilanti) German American Bank Kempf s Commercial and Savings Bank People's Bank State Savings Bank Union Savings Bank Ypsilanti Savings Bank Wayne county: Aiaerican Exchange National Central Savings Bank CStizens' Savings Bank Commercial National Bank Detroit Savings Bank Detroit Trust Co Detroit United Bank Dime Savings Bank Fairview Savings Bank Rrst Commercial Savings Bank First National Bank German American Bank Home Savings Bank Laphan State Bank Michigan Savings Bank National Bank of Commerce Northville State Savings Bask Old Detroit National Bank Peninsula Savings Bank People's State Bank Plymouth United Savings Bank River Rouge Savings Bank Security Trust Co Union Trust Co United States Savings Bank Wayne County Savings Bank Wayne Savings Bank Wyandotte Savings Bank Wexford county: Cadillac State Bank Manton Bank People's Savings Bank VESSEL PROPERTY. Another inovation in the taxation question has been proposed and dis- cussed quite at length in the two last sessions of the Michigan Legisla- ture, namely, the menthod of taxing what is known as vessel property. The proposition is to substitute a tonnage tax for the present plan of property assessment. The advocates of this change base their arguments on the claim that such a change would result either in an increased tax revenue or sufficient increase in business connected with shipping inter- ests to more than compensate for loss of taxes, should any ensue. The business proposition, of course, is entirely problematical in its outcome and would affect only comparatively few localities. The effect on tax revenue is one in which the State at large is more or less in- terested This phase of the question has been the subject of some investigation 88 by the board, with reference to the amount of taxes now received, the ton- nage which is now registered at ports of entry in the State, and the American tonnage registered at ports of entry in the states bordering on the Great Lakes. The amount of taxes actually received from the assessment of vessel property in Michigan for the year 1907, was f 72,000, in round numbers. The total net tons of vessels on registry books in Michigan ports of entry for 1907, was 256,162; net tons on registry books of other states bordering on Great Lakes for same year was 1,493,357 ; net tons on regis- try books of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, and Indiana for same year was 652,964; net tons on registry books of New York, Ohio snd Pennsyl- vania for same year was 840,393 ; net tonnage of all Great Lakes states was 1,749,519 ; taxes received under present system in Michigan equiva- lent to $0,041 per ton on all tonnage of Great Lakes. Of the states bordering on the Great Lakes, only two, Minnesota and Indiana, have the tonnage tax, which is three cents per net ton. Wis- consin, Ohio and Illinois levy taxes as in Michigan, on ad valorem or cash value basis. New York assesses this class of property on a capitali- zation basis. The board has, in its advisory capacity, endeavored to assist the local officers in that part of their labors relating to the assessment of vessel property. A record is kept of the name, tonnage and residence of owners of all boats entered at Michigan ports of entry. The different ports are visited previous to the second Monday in April, and our record is corrected by the addition of such boats as have registered within the year, and by eliminating those that have been withdrawn. Bach assessing officer is furnished with a list of all boat properties subject to taxation within his jurisdiction, as disclosed by the data thus prepared, and he reports to the board the assessments made on such properties, and if not assessed, the reason therefor. Any contemplated change in the method of securing a tax revenue from boat property should take into consideration the fact that in the search for pleasure and recreation there has come into existence an ex- tremely large number of boats of different types which are ncit to be found on the registry books of the United States. These are assessable under the present law and, in the majority of instances, are asse-sed. The observation of the board leads to the conclusion that yaojierty of this class to exceed |4,000,000 is assessable in the State of Michigan to-- day, and in justice to owners of other kinds of taxable properly should be taken into consideration in any contemplated change. It is largely to be found along the districts bordering on the Detroit and St. Clair rivers, and Lakes St. Clair and Huron; also in the great summer resort regions of northern and western Michigan, both' on the Great Lakes and on inland lakes. The loss of that portion of public revenue now boiiie by this property, would materially add to the taxes levied in these locali- ties on other classes of property. INFORMATION FOR THE STATE BOARD OF ASSa 3S0KS. The fourth report of this board called attention to the fact of the 'm- portance of prompt assistance by assessing officers in furnishing correct reports of the assessed valuations and taxes levied in their respective dis- 89 tricts, each year for the use of the State Board of Assessors. The board desires again to emphasize what was then said. The proper distribution of over |3, 500,000 annually to the primary schools of the State depends almost entirely on the promptness and accu- racy of such information, for by it is determined the average rate of taxation, which isi a very distinctive feature in ascertaining the amount to be distributed. No loophole should be left through which all or any portion of the money legally due this most important department of gov- ernment might be lost. The board is still confronted with the fact that in some cases it is necessary to make long journeys at considerable ex- pense to the State to secure a few of these reports, which the officer from whom the report is requested could ■fill out in not exceed fifteen min- utes. It is believed that the great importance of this matter has been so clearly demonstrated that there will be no delinquents in the future. REVIEWS. The corrective powers of the board have been directed during the years 1907 and 1908 to the consideration of such complaints as have been brought before it under the only provision of the law by which it can act in this capacity, namely: "By complaint in writing of a resident taxpayer." The board has set forth in another portion of this report the reasons why it deems this an unjust limitation of the powers that should be granted to a board having any corrective jurisdiction whatever. This portion of the report will, therefore, be confined to the action taken in such matters as have come before it in a legal manner. The review held in Bellaire, September 12, 1907, included all the real estate in Forest Home township, Antrim county, and necessitated an ex- amination of every description of property on the assessment roll of that township, which includes a part of the village of Bellaire. The same was true of Inverness township, Cheboygan county, reviewed at Cheboygan, October 8, 1907. Within this township is located the ]\Iich- igan plant of the Pfister & Vogel Leather Company, involving nearly 1500,000 worth of property. The township of Sherman, Iosco county, which was reviewed October 10, 1907, at Tawas City, also involved all real estate in the township, and necessitated the same kind of investigation as in the other two cases. The township of Nadeau in Menominee county, which was reviewed October 1 and 2, 1908, contained eighty-one sections of land, and three small villages. This review also covered all real estate in the township, which consisted of farm lands, timber lands, wild and cut over lands, swamp lands, saw mill and village property, and every description of real estate in the township received a personal investigation before any valuation was fixed upon it. Numerous complaints were received at the office, which upon considera- tion were either determined not to be justifiable or were withdrawn after consultation with the complainant. The limited force available to the board for reassessment purposes, the care which must be exercised in the work and the short time in which to exercise corrective powers, especially where whole assessment districts are to be covered, require considerable discretion in determining those cases which seem most clearly entitled to the time and attention which is at the command of the board. 90 To those whose merit&rious cases it has been unable, for reasons stated, to give that relief they appear to deserve, the board can only say it very much regrets the conditions which prevent siich action. During the year 1907 and 1908, reviews were held as indicated by the following table: Reviews, 1907. Held at. Date. Assessment district reviewed. Property. July 6, 1907 Sept. 3, 1907 Sept. 12, 1907 Sept. 18, 1907 Sept. 18, 1907 Sept. 18, 1907 Sept. 18, 1907 Sept.l8, 1907 Sept. 18, 1907 Sept.l8, 1907 Sept. 19. 1907 Sept. 19, 1907 Sept.l9, 1907...... Oct. 2, 1907 Oct. 8, 1907 Oct. 10, 1907 WiUiamfiton Twp Forest Home Twp Walker Twp Bellaire ... Real estate. Polkton Twp Gr. Rapids, Gr. Haven & Muskegon Ry. Co. Spring Lake Twp Tallmadge Twp Wright Twp Grand Haven City J^uitport Twp Gr. Rapids, Gr. Haven & Muskegon Ry. Cq. Gr. Rapids, Gr. Haven & Muskegon Ry. Co. Muskegon Muskegon Heights City.. Monitor Twp Gr. Ra,pids, Gr. Haven & Muskegon Ry. Co. Bay City Real estate and personal. Reviews, 1908. Held at Date. Assessment district reviewed. Property. Ypsilanti June 29 1908 2d Judicial Dist., Ypsilanti. . . Baldwin August 5 1908 . Real estate and personal. Mt. Pleasant August 6* 1908 Monroe August 25 1908 Real estate and personal. Sault Ste. Marie September 28, 1908 Sault Ste. Marie October land 2, 1908 October 5 1908 Bellaire Forest Home Township Real estate