% 5F Mt4- Cornell University Library SF 973.M64 Hog cholera and anti-hog cholera serum. 3 1924 000 260 301 LIBRARY NEW YORK STATE VETERINARY COLLEGE ITHACA, NEW YORK THIS BOOK IS THE GIFT OF T'co'\ft.%%0\- d^ TWero^Y CAAign, ^STftnW Aift'|v*a.\g Imifi, State Veteeixary College. 95 HOG CHOLERA AND ANTI-HOG CHOLERA SERUM. H. J. 'Milks. Department of Materia Medica and Small Animal Clinic. The importance of '' Hog Cholera " and the production of anti- hog eholera serum to the live stock interests of the State will be readily seen when one considers that according to the year book of the United States Department of Agriculture for 1910, there were 656,000 hogs in the State with a value of $7,5i4,000. There has always been doubt as to whether the highly infectious disease hog cholera existed in the State or whether the reported outbreaks of cholera were not caused by some dietary condition as, for in- stance, Moore has pointed out in the case of feeding swill which contained large quantities of powdered soap. However, after the discovery that a filterable virus is the cause of the|epizootic disease and not the bacillus of hog cholera, it was suggested that some of the outbreaks of apparently infectious diseases of swine from which this latter organism could not be isolated might be due to the filterable virus. With this in view, several inoculations were made with the filtered blood of animals which had died of supposed hog cholera. The result of this work proves , conclusively that hog cholera exists in four counties of the State and there is good evidence that it is present in other localities. . Historically it is interesting to note that hog cholera has existed in this country for a long time. It was first reported from Ohio in 1833 and was thought by American authorities to have been imported from Europe. Scientists on that continent, however, denied its existence in Europe until long after its appearance here. The absence of positive diagnosis at that time failed to make clear in which country it originated. It is reasonably cer- tain, however, that Ohio was the first state to be infected. During the next twenty years after its first appearance there were over ninety outbreaks divided among several states and furnishing centers from which the infection has been carried to practically ever state in the Union. Dr. Geo. Sutton of Aurora, Ind., made the first report upon the disease in 1853. This was followed by reports by E. M. Snow of Providence, R. I., in 1861, Dr. James Law, Ithaca, N. T., in 1875, and Dr. Detmers in 1877. Dr. Law's re^p^rt coiitains, the 96 Annual Eepoet of the first fairly accurate and complete description of the disease. The work of these men covered the symptoms of the disease and the post-mortem appearance of the organs of animals that had died of it, in fact all that could be learned from field observation alone. In 1878, Congress made an appropriation for the investigation of swine diseases, ^ine men were appointed for the investiga- tion of ISTS, and these for a period of two months only. Con- sequently little was accomplished. The researches of these men were to be made in the field and various measures applicable to the control of epizootic di eases were tried. The results of these investigations were summed tip as follows in a publication of the Bureau of Animal Industry, 1889, Hog Cholera: 1. Swine diseases were found destructive in the most widely separated districts of the countrjr. 2. The symptoms and post-mortem lesions were similar to those described by Sutton, Snow, Law, and others. 3. Xo evidence was discovered to show that there was more than one disease which prevailed as an epizootic. 1. It was believed that the outbreaks were due to a contagion and that the disease was communicable. 5. The remedies tested were either without effect or of doubt- ful value ill the treatment of affected animals or guarding against the contagion. Of the nine investigators only Law and Detmers retained their appointment longer than two months. These men did consider- able laboratory work. Law made inoculations into rabbits, rats and sheep and seemed to establish the communicability of the disease he investigated. Detmers, by the aid of the microscope, thought he had discovered the cause of the disease and naiked the organism Bacillus siiis. Both of these conclusiofis were in error but pointed out the need of bacteriological research and careful laboratory work as the only means of determining the cause and prevention of the disease. Law and Detmers continued their in- vestigation for the Department of Agriculture in 1879. In 1880 Salmon was added. Law devoted much of his time to the produc- tion of a vaccine by attenuation of the virus or cause of the disease. In this he was unsuccessful. During this time Detmers continued his investigation with the microscope. During the next four years little was done in investigation because it was under- stood that it had been carried about as far as possible under the methods then emplo^'ed and because of a lack of facilities for and clear methods of bacteriological research. State Vetetiinaky College. 97 In 1885 it was amioiinced that Salmon and Smith had dis- covered the cause of the disease. This was determined as due to a motile rod, to which the name has been given Bacillus cJwlerae ^uis or hog cholera bacillus. These investigators showed that this organism was found in the organs of most of the animals which they had examined that died of cholera. Further, they ■could produce symptoms similar to hog cholera and lesions, in many cases, indistinguishable from those of animals that had con- tracted the disease naturally. They were also able to recover the bacillus from the animals which had died as the result of the inoculation. In 1886, Smith described an entirely different infectious dis- ease of swine due to an organism belonging to the present Septi- caemia Plaemorrhagica group. Accordingly, it was considered that there were two distinct infectious diseases: hog cholera in which the lesions were largely in the digestive tract, and swine plague in which the lungs were mostly involved. In many out- breaks they were able to find both diseases present and to recover both organisms from the same animal. The results of Salmon and Smith were confirmed by scientists ■of this and other countries and it was generally conceded that there were two contagious diseases of swine, namely hog cholera .and swine plague. Since Bacillus cJiolerae suis was announced as being the cause of hog cholera, the work has been largely to find a vaccine or •serum which would serve as a preventive for the disease. Various vaccines and sera were tried but none of the preparations gave satisfactory or practical results. It was not imtil about twenty years later that de Schweinitz was led to the suspicion that B. cholerae suis was not the cause of the epizootic form of the 'disease. He noticed that although hog cholera is very contagious and spreads readily to other members of the herd when once it is introduced, yet when an animal was injected with pure cultures ■of B. cholerae suis, in many cases the animal would become sick and die from the effects of the injection, but other animals asso- ciating with it would remain well. He also found that it was difficult to produce hog cholera by subcutaneous injections of •cultures of the hog cholera bacillus, while the injection of some of the blood of a sick animal siibcutaneously into a sound one would produce the disease. Other reasons were that although made immune to pure cultures of the hog cholera bacillus, animals 4 OS Anxual EhfO^Tt of thi; were by no means immune when exposed to animals sick witb cholera. These facts led to further investigation. In 1903- de Schweinitz and Dorset (Circular 41, B. A. I.) reported that B. cholerae suis was not the specific cause of the epizootic disease, but that the cause was a filterable virus or one so small that it could be passed through the finest porcelain filter. It might be' well to add a word relative to the term '' filterable virus." There are? certain diseases, for instance rinderpest and foot-and-mouth disease, that are highly contagious, and which are due to invisible organisms or viruses present in the blood and fluids of the body. These viruses are so small that they can be passed through the finest porcelain filter and are invisible even with our strongest microscopes. As a result of experiments published in 1805 (B. A. I. Bul- letin 'Ko. 72i), it was determined that the filterable virus is the real cause of the epizootic disease of swine j that the hog cholera and swine plague bacteria are, so far as the epizootics are con- cerned, secondary invaders. The fact, however, must not be lost sight of that Bacillus cholerae suis and Bacterium septicaemia haemorrJiagica are the cause of certain diseases of swine, and in m^any outbreaks they exert considerable influence as to the mani- festations of the disease. Means hy which the infection is spread. Hog cholera may be spread from a single center of infection in many ways. One of the most prevalent is the purchase of a hog from an infected herd and placing it in a sound one. It is also spread to some extent by taking the sows from a sound herd to an infected herd for service. This has occurred once in our experience in which we had a clear history. The infection may also be carried from one farm to another upon the attendant's shoes or upon the wheels of wagons driven through an infected territory. Horses and cattle though not capable of contracting the disease may carry the in- fection from one place to another upon their feet. This also holds good in the case of dogs feeding upon carcasses dead of the dis- ease. Furthermore, it may be carried down a stream of water from pollution higher up. Period of incubation. The period of incubation varies from a few days to two or even three weeks. This depends a great deal upon the method of exposure, virulence of the virus, and resist- ance of the animals exposed. Young and pampered animals are usually more susceptible and have the more acute form of the State Veteeinaey College. 99 disease. A short period of incubation usually means a virulent type of the disease. As in the case of most infections, the virus •of hog cholera is more virulent in the earlier part of an outbreak ■of the disease and may become so v^eak that the resistant animals may not become affected at all. Symptoms. The symptoms of hog cholera are not very charac- teristic. Fever is usually present and in animals that are coming down -with the disease, which have not as yet shown any symptoms •of siclcness, the temperature may be several degrees above normal, frequently it is subnormal in the last stages of the disease. Soon .after being attacked the animal loses appetite, becomes weak and may have convulsions. In the early part of an outbreak, the yoimg and very fat animals may succumb without showing any symptoms of sickness. Diarrhoea may be present and usually follows constipation, although constipation sometimes persists throughout the disease. The symptoms vary somewhat with the virulence of the out- break and the resistance of the animals attacked. If the virulence is high and the resistance low the acute form is seen. In this type of the disease, the animal shows fever, dullness, stiffness, soreness, tremors, weakness, and loss of appetite. It does not move unless made to do so ; in general there is great depression. The eyes are inflamed and the lids gummed with the secretions. Hed patches usually appear upon the skin, especially in the region ■of the ears, lower jaw, abdomen and inside of the legs. Some- times the redness is d^^ffuse, covering the entire regions mentioned. Before death this may turn to a purplish color. Coughing, rapid breathing, and other symptoms of respiratory derangement may be present but usually these symptoms are not pronounced until shortly before death. In the chronic type of the disease 'about the same symptoms are •exhibited as in the acute except that the illness may last several weeks or months, during which there is the usual weakness, loss of appetite, inflammation of the eyes, and usually profuse diar- rhoea. If these cases recover they are rarely of any value to the owner. It will be noticed from the above description that there are no symptoms characteristic of the disease. However, if an animal or two have died and then after an interval of a week or ten days others become affected in a similar manner, there is sufficient grounds for suspecting the presence of hog cholera. 100 AxxuAL Eepoet of the Post mortem ajypearances. There may be reddi&h or purplish spots upon the skin or the entire region mentioned under symp- toms may be colored. Petechiae may be present upon the surface of the heart and occasionally on the pericardium and lungs. Fre- quently pneumonia is present but is not so characteristic as the small hemorrhages. In acute cases the spleen is usually enlarged, dark colored, soft, filled with blood, and may show hemorrhages beneath its capsule. In chronic- cases this enlargement is not noticed and the color is often lighter than normal. The lymph glands in the ingaiinal region are swollen and red or even dark in color in the acute form of the disease. Those in other parts of the body, mesenteric, angles of the jaw, etc., may be affected in a similar manner. These lesions are not often found in chronic cases. The kidneys in the acute disease are usually the seat of small hemorrhages. To observe the condition of the kidneys it is necessary to remove the capsule. If the kidnej's are slit open hemorrhages of a similar nature may be seen on their inner siirfaces. The color of the kidneys is usually darker than normal and the hemorrhages may vary in size from a mere point up to the size of a pin head. Sometimes petechiae are foiind on the serous side of the stomach and small intestine. The mucosae of these organs may also show hemorrhages. The large intestine, however, is usually the seat of extensive lesions. In the acute form of the disease hemor- rhages may be present on both stirfaces of this organ. Erosion of the mucous membrane is also common. The mucosa may be blood stained ■ and the contents of the bowel blood stained from the extravasation of blood. In the chronic form of the disease, thc- so-called " button ulcers " may be found. These ulcers are usually found in the caecum upon or near the ileo-caecal valve and are quite characteristic of the disease. They are circular, hard, yellow in color, with a darker greenish yellow center, raised dis- tinctly above the healthy mucous membrane. They vary in size from mere points to an inch in diameter and are so numerous in some cases that large portions of the organ are destroyed. If the ulcers are found diagnosis can be made fairly accurately, al- though there is no other disease in this country in which the petechiae are found in the heart, lungs, kidneys and other organs. Any or all of the above described lesions may be found in an animal dead of cholera, but only an occasional animal exhibits all the lesions. For instance, it is practically impossible to find State Veteeinaey College. 101 the button-like ulcers in the acute form of the disease and but rarely are the hemorrhages seen in the chronic type. Diag-nosis. Before diagnosing a disease as hog cholera there are a few important factors one should bear in mind. In the first place, is the disease contagious? That is, can it be spread from one animal to another? Then the symptoms and post- mortem lesions should be considered. It is possible to get a fairly good idea relative to the disease from these observations but m order to prove conclusively that the disease is hog cholera, it is necessary to produce the disease in a sound animal by inocu.- lating it with some of the filtered blood of a dead or very sick animal. The disease must be distinguished from sickness due to im- proper feeding, especially in case of swill or garbage fed animab, as it has been shown by Moore that powdered soaps used in wash- ing dishes may cause a disease which resembles cholera. Of course disorders due to dietary conditions would not spread as an epizootic, while hog cholera would most likely spread throughout the neighborhood. There are so very few other diseases which might be confused with cholera that time will not be taken to discuss them. Treatment and prevention. There is no successful treatment for hogs sick with cholera. Various products have been recom- mended for this purpose but are of no practical value. The only rational method of dealing with an epizootic is to prevent the spread of the infection instead of attempting to cure those animals already sick. Since there can be no cholera without the filterable virus, every precaution shoiild be taken to prevent its being carried to sound herds. After the disease has appeared in a herd, the only known remedy that will prevent its spread is the Dorset- jSTiles anti-hog cholera serum. This preparation will prevent the infection of other members of the herd if used in the early part of an epizootic. Besides administering serum the pens, troughs, and yards should be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected, so that the infection will not be carried to other places. Production of the serum. Since the filterable virus could not be grown artificially, it was necessary to resort to the blood of hogs sick with cholera for any protective agent. On this account many attempts were made to produce a vaccine by attenuating the blood of sick animals. The results obtained by such attenua- tion were too uncertain for general use. While endeavoring to 102 Annual Eepoet of the produce a vaccine, it was noticed that by injecting an immune animal with large amounts of virulent blood, a serum of high protective powers could be obtained. (E. A. I. Bulletin Xo. 102, Dorset, -McBi-ide, Niles.) In order to produce anti-hog cholera serum it is necessary to have an immune animal. Tor this purpose a pig is immunized by inoculation with a few centimeters of virulent blood and an injection of anti-hog cholera serum in opposite sides of the body. Then the immune is hyperimmunized by the injection of large quantities of virulent blood. The large amounts of virulent blood required are obtained as follows : A few centimeters of virulent blood are injected into susceptible pigs. When these animals are in the last stages of the disease, they are bled under antiseptic conditions, the blood deiibrinated by shaking with glass beads, and strained through sterile gauze. To produce potent serum a strong virus is necessary, that is, one that kills quickly. Otherwise the serum produced would be weak in protective properties. We may hyperimmunize in any of the following ways : 1. J .^■^ *■■«: '-*^ ^ '--M^^