V .1 C^otnell Untneraitg Slihratg iltl;aca. 29'eta ^aitt BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE FISKE ENDOWMENT FUND THE BEQUEST OF WILLARD FISKE LIBRARIAN OF THE UNIVERSITY 1863-1883 1905 The date shows when this volume was taken. . HOME USE RULES All Books aubject to recall fc> rTVT~r'"*i'>'iii]\)^'j' ^i\\ ^ All borrowers must regis- -. ter in the library to borrow books for home use. J"aaI*V '^iiSBMii'^IVt D' ^^^ books must be re- B'?...!....... turned at end of college i year for inspection and repairs. Limited books must be returned within the four week limit and not renewed. Students must return all books before leaving town. Officer? should arrange for „.. the return of books wanted during their absence from ^ town- Volumes of periodicals " and of pamphlets are held in the library as much as possible. For special pur- ..__^ _ poses they are given out for n limited time. ■■■-*, .......■• 1 Borrowers should not use their library privileges for thebenefitof other persons. , Books of special value and gift books, when the ^.. giver wishes it, are not allowed to circulate. : Readers are asked tore- port all cases of books marked or mutilated. Do not deface books by marks and writing. CORNELL UNtVERSrTY LIBRARY 3 1924 092 547 151 ^2 H\ Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924092547151 THE MASTER, WARDENS, AND ASSISTANTS OF THE WORSHIPFUL COMPANY OF DRAPERS 1913-1914 Master. Colonel Starling Meux Benson, LL.D. Wardens. Lieut.-Col.JohnLewisRutley,V.D. Arthur George Ashby. Webster Glynes. Sir John Aird, Bart. Assistants. Frederick William flarris. John Barrow. Rev. Henry Boyd, D.D. His Hon. Judge William Denman Charles Hales. Benson, LL.D. Sir Cornelius Neale Dalton, Bernard Francis Harris. K.C.M.G., C.B., D.C.L. Arthur Stewart Daniell. Ernest Gardner, M.P. Gerald Walton Williams. Charles Fellows Pearson. George Gardner. Henry Hayne. Sydney Shorter. Sebastian Edward Shorter. The Rt. Hon. Sir William Grey Henry Trood Mason. Ellison Macartney, K.C.M.G. Arthur Warren Williams. Rev. JohnNeale Dalton, K.C.V.O., Walter Silvester Gardner. C.M.G. Clerk. Ernest Henry Pooley. ^HE History of The JWbrshipful Company of the Drapers of London : preceded by an Introduction on London and her Gilds up to the close of the XVth Century. By the Rev. A. H. Johnson, Fellow and Chaplain of All Souls College Initial from Charter No. I Vol. I Oxford At the Clarendon Press 1914 A.a^'/^iia Oxford University Press London Edinburgh Glasgow New York Toronto Melbourne Bombay Humphrey Milford M.A. Publisher to the University PREFACE T is the play of economic interests and social forces which chiefly deter- mines the movements of history and gives it its true meanings and of all the outward forms, which these in- terests and forces assumed, few are more important than the mediaeval Gilds. The Gild belongs to the period which has been called that of ' Town Economy ',^ when each city and its neighbourliood was looked upon as a self-containing and economical unit, based on a jealous protective spirit. As long as this lasted the influence of the Gilds was all-pervading. They did not confine them- selves exclusively to their industrial functions. They influenced the social environment and the civic structure of the town to which they belonged ; they formed as it were the warp of its social and economic structure. They took part in its public burdens, they shared in its civic joys and griefs, in its fortunes good and evil. ■ The initial comes from the Ordinance Book, p. 75. = The classification is that of BUcher, Die Entstehnng der Volkswirtschaft ; cf translation by Wickett, especially pp. 114 if. A3 iv Treface But by the close of the fifteenth century the wider system of *■ national Economy ' began to be developed, to be followed by that of an * international ' or * world Economy ', and the industrial conditions grew too complex to be satisfactorily organized by the Gild system. The market now became far wider than that of the town, while the capitalist entrepreneur who rose to meet the new developments refused to submit to the old Gild restrictions. From that moment the usefulness of the Gilds declined, and by the end of the seventeenth century they had altogether ceased to control the industrial world. Never- theless they still remained as interesting relics of the past, and, of late, by their renewed activities in the promotion of philanthropic work, and of education, both theoretical and technical, have gone far to satisfy all but the most extravagant. Of the Gilds of London, that of the Worshipful Company of Drapers is one of the most important. I have been entrusted with the valued privilege of writing its history, which is long overdue. Although Herbert in his work on the Livery Companies of London has already seized on the more salient points, his account is based on a somewhat superficial study of the original documents in the possession of the Company, and is unfortunately very inaccurate. And no other history of the Drapers has been attempted. If the interest taken by the author in his work were the measure of his success, I should feel no qualms. Unfortunately much more is required. It is therefore with some trepidation that I face my readers. Treface v Whatever success I may have attained is certainly largely due to the generous assistance I have received on all hands. The earlier part of my work, up to the end of the reign of Elizabeth, has been much facilitated by the transcripts of the Company's Documents, which had been already executed by Mr. Welch and his son. I owe my thanks to Mr. Pooley, the Clerk of the Worshipful Company, and to Miss Greenwood for help most ungrudgingly and generously given. I have also to thank Miss Greenwood for the Index. Without the loyal co-operation of Miss Watkins, my Secretary, and the assiduous attention of Mr. Whitaker, the Sub- Librarian of All Souls College, and his staff, the publication of this first instalment would have been long delayed. Bodley's Librarian as well as the staff have often helped me in elucidating difficult questions. M. Pirenne, the eminent Historian of the Low Countries, has generously given me much valuable information on the early history of the cloth industry in its original home. Among others, I owe to Miss M. Sellers and Mr. Heaton much instruction with regard to the Yorkshire cloth in- dustry; to Professor Oman, assistance in heraldry; and to the Rev. Dr. P. H. Aitken, great help with regard to the earliest paper used for the Drapers' documents. Finally I have to thank Mr. Leys, of University College, Oxford, and Professor Unwin, of the Victoria University, Manchester, for their careful reading of the proofs, and the latter for many invaluable criticisms and suggestions. vi Treface The first two volumes, which are now offered to the public, bring the History of the Drapers' Company up to the close of the reign of Elizabeth. How many more volumes may be required to complete the work, I am not as yet in a position to state. The material in the possession of the Company is very voluminous and has been as yet untouched by me. But the Court has kindly acceded to my wish that I should no longer delay to publish the History of the Company during the period when, in common with the other Gilds of London, it most pro- foundly influenced not only the industrial but the civic life of our metropolis. I have prefaced the history of the Company by an Introduction on the relations of the Gilds to the govern- ment of the City up to the close of the fifteenth century, in the hope that the exact position of the Company in the development of London would thereby be made more clear. All Souls College, Oxford, July I914. CONTENTS OF VOLUME I PAGE INTRODUCTION London and her Gilds from the Norman Conquest to the Close of the Middle Ages i CHAPTER I The Early History of the Cloth Trade up to the End of the Thirteenth Century. The first appearance of the Draper 6i CHAPTER II The History of the Drapers from the Opening of the Four- teenth Century to the Letters Patent of Edward III, 1364 81 CHAPTER III The History of the Gild or Fraternity of the Drapers from the Letters Patent of Edward III (1354) to the year 14.7^ pp CHAPTER IV The Relations of the Drapers' Gild or Fraternity to the Political Events of the Reigns of Henry V, Henry VI, Edward rV, Richard III, and Henry VII . . .127 CHAPTER V Changes in the Organization of the Fellowship of Drapers between 1441 and i^op 147 viii Contents APPENDICES PAGE I. An Account of the chief original Documents up to 1603 in the possession of the Drapers' Company . 173 II A. Drapers in the Thirteenth Century . . .182 II B. Evidences as to the functions of the Drapers in the Thirteenth Century . . . . .184 III A. Drapers in the Fourteenth Century up to the date of the first Charter, 1354. 185- III B. Evidences as to the functions of the Drapers in the Fourteenth Century . . . .151 IV. Ordinances of the Brotherhood of Our Lady of Bethlehem, 1371 , . . , . . ip5 V. Stat. 3 7 Edward III, cc. s-> ^- That Merchants and Artificers shall keep to their own Merchandise and Mystery. Stat. 3 8 Edward III, c. 2, repeal- ing same ........ 202 VI. Letters Patent of July ij-, 38 Edward III, 13^4 . 204 VII. Petition of the Mystery of Drapers against the election of Nicholas Brembre as Mayor in 1384 . 208 VIII. Grant of a Quit-rent by Fitzalwyn, paid by the Drapers' Fraternity. September 30, 7 Henry VI, 142-8 211 IX. Letters Patent of Henry VI. Charter of Incor- poration. November 30, 17 Henry VI, 1438 . 214 X. The Grant of the Farm of Aulnage. February i5, 17 Henry VI, 1439, new style .... 2i5 XL Grant of Arms. March 10, 17 Henry VI, 1439, new style 221 Contents ix PAGE XII. Inspeximus Charter of July id', 6 Edward IV (14.66), confirming and expanding that of 17 Henry VI 2,29 XIII. Confirmation of the Drapers' Right of Search. October 6, i5 Henry VI, 1447 . . .232 XIV. Ordinance of the Mayor confirming the Right of Search of WooUen Cloths, October 5, 26 Henry VI, 144.7 233 XV. Letters Patent of Edward IV, promising that shearmen shall have no Corporation. April p, ip Edward IV, 147P . . . . 235- XVI. Letters Patent of Richard III releasing the Drapers from all forfeitures for oflFences committed before February 21, 1484. May 21, i Richard III, 1484 236 XVII. The Oath Book or Book of Ordinances, originally drawn up in 1405- and entered in the book in 1460, with later additions up to I J3 1 . , 242 XVIII. Transcript of the earliest Wardens' Accounts from 1414 to 144.2 . ..... 282 XIX. The First Drapers' Hall. Grant of site . .348 XX A. Transcript of the Wardens' Accounts for the year 1481-2 3^1 XX B. Transcript of the earliest Renters' Accounts for the year 14.8 1-2 ...... 35-6 XXL List of Members of the Drapers' Company in 1493 364 XXII A. Transcript of the Wardens' Accounts for the year i;'o8-p ........ 367 XXIIb. Transcript of the Renters' Accounts for the year 1708-P 374 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS IN VOLUME I PAGE The Original Arms of the Drapers, 14.3P . . facing page -lix Seal of 143P. From a cast in the British Museum . . 2,2^ Sacramental Pyx ........ 226 The Arms of July 1 5-5 1 facing page 11.6 The Arms of 16^13 ........ 227 Present-day Seal .228 Arms of To-day 228 INTRODUCTION LONDON AND HER GILDS FROM THE NORMAN CONQUEST TO THE CLOSE OF THE MIDDLE AGES HE theory that the civic struc- London at ture of London grew out of, or the date of was originally based on the Gild, ^°"", . 1 111 11 quest and m has now been abandoned by most ^^^^ ^^■^ ^f historians. Gilds, indeed, as we Henry I. shall see, existed in London be- fore the Norman Conquest. But it was not till much later that the voluntary association of the Gild and municipal Government began to influence one another and to coalesce.^ From the scanty Charter ^ of the Conqueror to London we learn little except that the City ' The initial comes from Charter No. I. ^ The suggestion of Mr. Loftie that the Cnighten Gild formed a part of the government of the City in Anglo-Saxon or Norman times is refuted by Mr. Round. Loftie, London, i. 98; Round, Commune of London, pp. 105, 12 1. Mr. Loftie makes much of the fact that Leofstan, who had been Portreeve in the Confessor's day, was head of the Cnighten Gild in the reign of Henry I. But this proves nothing ; the same man might be Portreeve and head of the Gild at the same time, without there being any connexion between these two offices, just as we know that several of the members of the Gild were Aldermen at the time of its dissolution. Nor again had London then or at any time a Merchant Gild. Gross, Gild Merchant, i. lof. For an account of the Cnighten Gild and Merchant Gilds cf. pp. if, 16 of this volume. Cf. also Petit Dutaillis, Studies Supplementary to Stubbs, p. 67 ; Maitland, Township and Borough ; Bateson, Mediaeval England, Borough Customs. So too, abroad, the origin of the civic government is to be looked for not in the Gild system but in the rural organization of the Manor. The Merchant Gild abroad had even less 3 Cf. Stubbs, Charters, 8th ed., p. 108. 1603-1 B z Introduction had 'a certain unity under its portreeve and its Bishop', and that the The Charter burghers were to be held ' Law worthy '. The Charter of Henry I of Henry I. jg much more exphcit, but, although it makes some changes, it probably did not alter materially the basis of the civic constitution. The City at that date is organized on the analogy of a rural shire. It is independent of any other county ; and Middlesex, the county in which it lies, is held of the Crown at a ' ferm ' of 300 pounds. It is given the privilege of electing a Sheriff and a Justiciar of its own, who have the sole jurisdiction over the burghers. The folkmoot of London, answering to the shiremoot of a shire, is recognized as well as the ' Husting Court ', which was a general meeting of the citizens for judicial purposes.^ Although the charter does not appear to mention the Ward's,^ there can be little doubt that they already existed.^ connexion with the municipal organization than in England ; and the Craft Gilds, although they seriously modified the later development and in some cases, as in London, became subsequently an integral part of the town administration, were not so at first. On the Foreign Gilds generally, cf. Gross, Gild Merchant, 282 ; Pirenne, Belgique, i. \6^ S., 2JJ fF., ^66 ff. ; Revue historique, f 3, 1893, 57, 1895, Les Origines des institutions urbaines ; Lavisse, Histoire de France,iv. 341 if., v. 397 if., vi. /(?; Luchaire, Communes franpises; Giry, (a) Histoire de la ville St. Omer, (6) Etudes sur les origines de la commune de St. Quentin ; Flach, Origines de I'ancienne France ; Lecaron, Les Origines de la manicipalit6 parisienne (MSmoires de la Soci^tl de I'histoire de Paris, vii, viii, 1 880-1); Fagniez, Etudes sur I'industrie a Paris aux xiii^ et xiv^ si^cles ; Hegel, Stadte und Gilden der germanischen Volker im Mittelalter; Gierke, Das deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht ; Below und Keutgen, Urkunden zur stadtischen Verfassungs- geschichte ; Schanz, Gesellenvetbande. For the Hanseatic League cf. article m Encyclopaedia Brit, and authorities quoted ; Doren, Entwickelung und Organisa- tion der florentiner Ziinfte im xiii.-xiv. Jahrhundert, in SchmoUer, Forschungen, p. 59. Ashley, Surveys Historic and Economic, p. 67, gives a useful survey of the most important writers on the subject. ' On the Hustings Court, c£ Sharpe, Calendar of Wills, i, p. rr. = The word ' wardemotum ' in the passage should probably be read 'vadi- monium ' (debts owing). Cf. Round, Commune of London, Appendix P, p. 370. He shows that the word ^' vadimonium ' occurs in the Charter of Henry II, which was framed on the model of that of Henry I, and points out that the singular, ' wardemotum ', is meaningless, since there were many Wardmoots, not one Wardmoot. ^ The most ancient list of the Wards that has been found is in Liber L MSS., Library of St. Paul's, and is probably of the date of A. D. 1 1 1 J or thereabouts. The number there recorded is twenty. Of these one is called the Bishop's Ward. Three have local names— Warda Fori (Cheap), Alegate (Aldgate), London and her Gilds 3 Thus the municipal unity granted by the Charter is ' of the same sort as that ot the county and hundred '. But, as in the shire, the churches, the barons, the citizens, retain their ' sokes ' or jurisdictions and their privileges ; and the City is only as yet ' a bundle of communities, townships or villages, parishes and lordships '.' Brocesgange (Walbrook or Dowgate). Sixteen are called by the names of citizens who, though not yet called Aldermen, evidently enjoy that position. Two at least of these are among the fifteen members of the Anglo-Saxon Cnighten Gild who surrendered their lands and their soke of Portsoken to the Prior of Holy Trinity in iizj (cf. p. i6). This would make twenty-one. Three more were added at some date previous to 1127-8, when we find twenty- four Wards. In 1393 Farringdon Ward, previously called Warde de Lodgate et Neugate, was divided into two, Within and Without. This brought up the number to twenty-five. No further increase was made till the middle of the seventeenth century, when Cripplegate was divided, although the same Alderman to this day presides over the two Wards. The heads of the Ward, who become known as Aldermen in the thirteenth century, in all probability originally held their position by hereditary right as being the possessors of estates and courts, like the rural manorial courts m the City. They held views of frankpledge in their Wardmoots, set the watch and kept the gates of the City, and their jurisdictions were specially safeguarded in the Charter of Henry I, which promised that ' all churches, barons, and citizens should enjoy. their "sokes " and customs in peace '. This hereditary position was, however, soon changed for an elective one. The first notice of an Alderman being elected is in 1299, when Alexander Le Ferrun was chosen by the Ward of Walbrook. By the close of the thirteenth century the Wards are all known by local names. See Beaven, Aldermen, i. ^6^, ii. p. XV ; Baddeley, Aldermen of Cripplegate, p. 2135 Letter Book A, p. 209 ; C, pp. II, 12; Stow, Survey, ed. Kingsford, ii. 286. Pirenne, Belgique, i. 284, ii. 44, note, shows the same change with regard to the Echevins. ' C£ Select Charters, 8th ed., p. 108; Stubbs, Constitutional History, ed. 1874, i. 40J. Three points have been much disputed : (ij The grant of the 'ferm ' of Middlesex. (1) The relation of the Sheriff to the earlier Portreeve. (3) The meaning of the Justiciar. Mr. Sharpe, London and the Kingdom, i. 41, holds that the grant made the shire subject to the City. But Mr. Round (Geoffrey de Mandeville, p. 140, and Appendix F, p. 347) argues with great force that Middlesex included London as it had befijre. They had been held by Geoffrey de Mandeville.. Henry granted them to the citizens of London. But Stephen revoked this grant and bestowed the 'ferm ' of Middlesex and London on the grandson of Geoffrey. It was not till 1 1 ^^ that London regained the ' ferm ' as well as the right of appointing the Sheriff. Henceforth Middlesex and London are united and the ' ferm ' paid to the King is sometimes called that of London, sometimes of Middlesex, sometimes of 4- Introduction Nevertheless the privileges which the City had obtained by the Charter of Henry I were great, and on his death we find them Thereignsof even claiming the special right of electing the new King.' At Stephen and ^ later date in Stephen's reign, according to some authorities, they Henry II. ^^^^ arrogated to themselves the corporate unity of a French ' commune '. But the fortunes of the day were against them. Their nominee Stephen was but the shuttlecock of rival factions ; Geoffrey de Mandeville, who was Constable of the Tower and had been created Earl of Essex by Stephen, proved faithless, and only returned to his allegiance when bribed by being appointed to the offices of Sheriff and Justiciar of London and of Middlesex, the 'ferm ' of which was also granted to him. Though de Mandeville died in 1 145, Henry II did not restore the right of election to the citizens,'' but nominated the Sheriff himself Such exceptional powers as had been granted by Henry I were distasteful to the first Angevin King, and the same policy was at first continued by Richard I. Grant of the When, however, that knight-errant King had gone on his Commune by Jonn, both. Mr. Round also maintains that the Sheriff represents the Portreeve, a title "9'" which henceforth disappears. The number of the Sheriffs varied from time to time, until finally in the reign of Richard I two became the regular number. Though the Charter of Henry I allowed them to be elected by the citizens, they were nominated by the King during the reigns of Henry II and Richard I. John in 1199 restored the right of election to the citizens. By that date, however, London had its Mayor and the Sheriffs had become subordinate officers. The grant of the Justiciar, whether new or not, may be compared to the policy adopted by Norman kings of sometimes allowing the Sheriff to be justice in his own county. 'It represents ', says Mr. Round, ' the transitional stage between the localization of justice under the sheriff and the centralization under the future justices of the central Court.' During the reign of Stephen the ofHce was granted to Geoffrey de Mandeville. But with the more centralizing policy of Henry II, who forbad Sheriffs to be justices in their own county, the London Justiciar disappears. It may be, as is stated by the Liber Albus (p. 12), that the future Mayor represents the Justiciar, as well as the Portreeve, and that it was in virtue of this and not by royal commission that he was one of the Justices for gaol delivery in London. ' Gesta Stephani, Rolls Series, iii. j— 5. '^ Most writers say that Henry II confirmed the Charter of Henry I. But Mr. Round has shown that the clause with regard to the Sheriff finds no place in Henry II's Charter. Round, Mandeville, p. 368. London and her Gilds s Crusade, and William Longchamp Bishop of Ely, and the King's brother John, were rivals for the control of the Government, the Londoners once more had their opportunity. John, having suc- ceeded in driving the Bishop from power, and being anxious to obtain the support of the Londoners, granted them, with the consent of the other Bishops, Earls, and Barons, ' their "Communa" and swore to preserve it and all other dignities of the City as long as it should please the King ; the citizens on their part declaring their willing- ness to recognize John as King should his brother die childless'.' The exact meaning of the word ' Communa ' has indeed been disputed. But the best authorities agree that, whether the grant was a new one, or the confirmation of an old claim, made as early as the reign of Stephen,^ or whether again the idea was borrowed from Rouen or some other foreign town,^ it at least gave to London a 'communal unity ', ' a corporate unity of the munici- pality ', which took the place of the previous shire organization. •• Further, there is every probability that the concession was accom- panied by the establishment of the Mayoralty ,= while Mr. Round ' Benedictus Abbas, ii. 113. ^ As mentioned above. In 1141 the Londoners, when demanding the release of Stephen, then in the hands of the Empress Matilda, declared that they were sent ' a communione quam vocant Londoniarium ' (Malmesbury, Hist. Nov., iii. s. 46). This, according to some, shows that they had then formed a ' communa ', and even the cautious Bishop Stubbs allows that, if the municipal organization represented by the French ' Commune ' did not yet exist in London, the ' commimal idea ' seems to have been there. Constit. Hist., i. 407 j Sharpe, London and the Kingdom, i. 49. ^ Round, Commune of London, pp. 215 ff., argues that the idea of the commune was borrowed directly from Rouen and other French towns. This is, however, disputed by Miss Bateson, and is very questionable. Cf. Adams, London and the Commune, Eng. Hist. Review, xix. 702 ; Bateson, Eng. Hist. Review, xvi. (1902), 480, 707 j Petit Dutaillis, Studies Supplementary to Stubbs, p. 98. ■* It should, however, be understood that this grant of a commune did not go so far as to recognize the City as a legal ' persona '. This only came with Edward IV's Charter. ^ The Liber de Antiquis Legibus says that Fitzaylwin was the first Mayor of London in 11 89. In the Chronicles of London, 1205 is given as the date of the first Mayor. It seems, however, more probable that the office originated with the grant of the Communa. A Mayor is first mentioned in an official document in 1 194, when he was treasurer for Richard I's ransom. Cf Sharpe, London and the Kingdom, i. 66 ; Archaeol. Journal, i. 2 ^9. Introduction quotes a document to show that the Mayor was assisted by ' echevins ' who were probably Aldermen.' The establishment of the Communa must not, however, be looked upon as a move in the direction of democracy. The government was evidently in the hands of the powerful and the rich. The majority of the Aldermen of the Wards were still in all probability men of old descent, who held their Wards as private franchises.^ That the lower classes were not benefited by this concession of autonomous rule is indicated by the rebellion of William Fitzosbert five years subsequently ; a rebellion caused by the heavy and unequal taxation imposed upon the citizens by those in authority, taxation necessary to raise the ransom for King Richard.3 Nevertheless, London had in iipi made a very distinct ad- vance in the direction of self government, and it seemed as if she was going to rival some of the great towns of Germany or of Flanders in establishing a very large measure of municipal indepen- dence. This, however, was prevented by the might of the English Crown, and by the strong centralization which had already been established by earlier Kings, notably by Henry I and Henry II. The ministerial opinion as to the danger of this communal organization is well expressed by the royalist chronicler who declares that a commune ' puffs up the people, threatens the kingdom, and enervates the priesthood ', and that ' neither Richard I nor his father Henry II would ever have conceded it, even for a million marks of silver '. ■» John had made the concession to win support, but after the return of Richard we hear no more of the Communa, although Londoners"' apparently Henry Fitzaylwin remained Mayor for the rest of allowed to i Round, Commune, p. ijj^, contrary to the general opinion, would have us elect their believe that the Skivini were borrowed from the ' fichevins ' of Rouen. Cf. Mayors. Petit Dutaillis, p. 99. ^ The first mention of Aldermen being elected is in 1293, Letter Book C, pp. II, 12. ^ ' Imponebantur eis auxilia non modica, et divites, propriis parcentes marsupiis, volebant ut pauperes solverent universa.* Hoveden, iv. j. Cf. Stubbs, Charters, ed. Davis, 1913, p. 247, ■* Ric. Divis., p. J3. Cf. Stubbs, Charters, p. 2J2. The Com- mune dis- London and her Gilds 7 his life. John, however, after his brother's death, restored to the citizens the ' ferm ' of Middlesex and London and the right of electing their Sheriff at the price of 3,000 marks,' and finally in 1115- the King, in his vain endeavours to win their support against his rebellious Barons, granted them the right of annually electing their Mayor. Meanwhile, shortly after the accession of King John we hear of two bodies, one of twenty-five (i 200-1) and another of twenty- four (1205- -6), which have been by some considered to be the origin of the Court of Aldermen and of the Common Council." ^ English Hist. Review, July 1901, p. jo8. ^ The Liber de Antiquis Legibus mentions a body of twenty-five elected in lioo-i "^de discretioribus civitatis ', and sworn to take counsel on behalf of the City with the Mayor. In the Additional MS. British Museum, 142.52, fo. no, we find under date l2of-^ an oath taken by a body of twenty- four that they will exercise justice impartially and honestly. Mr. Sharpe (London and the Kingdom, i. 7 2), neglecting the second body of twenty-four, holds that the twenty-five are the origin of the Court of Aldermen. Mr. Round (Commune of London, p. 239), apparently neglecting the twenty-five, holds that the body of twenty-four are the origin of the Court of Common Council. He shows that at Rouen there was a similar body of twenty-four who acted as the Mayor's Council, and points out that ' the powers possessed by the Mayor and his Council ' over the whole town 'were quite distinct from the local power of each Alderman in his district or ward '. The difficulty of coming to a decision on the matter is considerable. 1. The body of twenty-five can scarcely be the Court of the Aldermen of Wards, since there were at that time certainly not twenty-five Wards. 2. The actual writ ordering the election of the twenty-four is to be found in the Close Rolls, Feb. 4, 120^-6, p. ^4. They are to be elected to amend the evils caused by the misgovernment of those in power whereby the City has suffered damage and the King has lost his proper tallages and forfeitures. The passage, which has been pointed out to me by Mr. Unwin, seems to dispose of Mr. Round's suggestion that they were borrowed from Rouen in 11 91, when the Commune was started. Moreover, the twenty-four evidently have to exercise judicial functions which were enjoyed by the future Court of Aldermen, not by the Common Council. A possible explanation might be found in considering the elected twenty-five with their deliberative functions as the origin of the Common Council, and the twenty-four with their judicial functions as being a recognition of the Court of Aldermen, since we know that it was somewhere about this date that the number of Wards was twenty-four. Cf. on the whole question Round, Commune of London, p. 239; Sharpe, London and the Kingdom, i. 72; Bateson, Hist. Review, 1902, p. J07 ; Baddeley, Aldermen of Cripplegate, p. 137; Beaven, 8 Introduction London sup- These concessions of John did not pacify the Londoners. They pom the still supported the Barons. Fitzwalter, the owner ' of Baynard's ^^'?"* Castle and its soke or Ward, was one of the most prominent Tohn^^iiij^ leaders of the rebellious Barons, and the importance of London is conclusively proved by the fact that the Mayor (Serlo le Mercer) stands on the list of the twenty-five Guardians of the Great Charter. So violent, indeed, was the hostility of the City to the King that, when supported by the Pope he annulled the Great Charter, they joined the extremists in calling in the French Prince Louis, and only tardily came to terms with the young King Henry on condition that their liberties should be acknowledged, and that citizens captured in the late hostilities should be set at liberty.'' Henry III, however, did not keep his promises. He interfered with their right to elect their Sheriffs ; he extorted money from them ; he bid for the support of the lower classes against the City magnates, depriving the Aldermen of their Wards, though offer- ing to restore some of them if they were elected by the Common Council, and on more than one occasion ' took the City into his own hands '? London and It is not, therefore, surprising that, when the quarrel finally the Barons' broke out between Henry and Simon de Montfbrt, the Londoners War, 1258. ^ej-e found on the side of the Barons. At first, however, as in the reign of Richard I, the City was not of one mind. All were indeed united in resisting the exactions of the King, but in many ways the interests of the ruling aldermanic class were not those of the lower. ■• The King had attempted to take advantage Aldermen, ii, p. xi ; Petit Dutaillis, Studies, 99. Cf. also the Curia Scawageriomm of Edward I's reign, the meaning of which is disputed. Letter Book C, pp. 151, 196; English Hist. Review, 1902, p. J 1 1. ' On Fitzwalter cf. Sharpe, London, i. 74, and authorities quoted there. ^ Treaty of Lambeth. ^ The authority for part of the reign of John and for the struggle under Henry III is Fitz Thedmar, an Alderman, author of the Chronicles of Mayors and Sheriffs of London. He himself had suffered from the royal tyranny in 1258, but nevertheless became a violent royalist partisan. Much is to be leamt from his account, but it is unfortunate that the popular party has no chronicler. Cfi Beaven, Aldermen, p. 368. ■* An attempt has been made to trace the conflict between the two parties in London and her Gilds 9 of these divisions with some success, and in ii5i, shortly before the outbreak of the Barons' War, Fitz Thomas was elected Mayor, apparently with the temporary approval of the King, against Fitz Richard, the representative of the aristocratic burghers. In any case Fitz Thomas soon broke with the King and voiced the cause of the lower people. To the indignation of the Alder- man chronicler Fitz Thedmar, Fitz Thomas encouraged them to style themselves the commons of the people, and followed their will without consulting the Aldermen or chief citizens. He acquiesced in an attack made on the French merchants, to whom Henry III had shown favour, and in stUl more questionable deeds. ' The people leagued themselves together by oath by the hundred and by the thousand under colour of keeping the peace, and went about reclaiming public land and rights of way which had been encroached upon.' ^ In \n.6\ Fitz Thomas was again elected by popular vote, the votes of the Aldermen being excluded, but in i "X^a^s the King refused to confirm his third election, an act to which F'itz Thomas responded by siding with de Montfort on the outbreak of war." The victory of Lewes (May 1 154.) made Fitz Thomas and his party complete masters of London.^ Nevertheless, according to Fitz Thedmar, instead of strengthening the City government against the King, as the Aldermen would have done, he ' told the men of each Craft to make such provision as should be to their own advantage, and that he himself would have the same proclaimed and observed '. Accordingly, ' individuals of every Craft made new statutes and provisions, or rather what might be styled abominations, and that solely for their own advantage, and London from the accession of Henry III from the names of the Mayors and Sheriffs. Loftie, i. 129. ' Riley, Chronicles of Mayors, p. 59. ^ Cf. Beaven, Aldermen, p. 3^9. On the King's side there were two ex-Mayors, six Aldermen, one of them Fitz Thedmar, and two who became Aldermen shortly after. On the side of de Montfort were three Aldermen and the Mayor Fitz Thomas. 3 It should be remembered that in \^6% two burghers from each town were for the first time summoned to attend Parliament. Unfortunately the names of the representatives for London are not given. 1603.1 C lO Introduction Right of electing the Mayor re- stored to the citizens, 1270. A disputed election, 127Z. The Mayor Hervi sup- ports the Crafts, but his policy is reversed by his successor. to the intolerable loss of all merchants coming to London and visiting the fairs of England, and the exceeding injury of all persons in the realm '. ' The death of Simon de Montfort at the fatal battle of Evesham, on August 4, 1265-, was followed by the immediate overthrow of Fitz Thomas, only just in time to prevent a massacre of the best and foremost of the City which, if we may believe Fitz Thedmar, was being prepared by the revolutionary Mayor. That Fitz Thomas, however, found some support among the upper classes is proved by the fact that among those proscribed after his fall are found two or three of the oldest names in the City. The truth is that the old oligarchy was breaking up, and the City, deprived of its head, was once more taken into the King's hands. Five years afterwards, in the year 1270, owing to the good offices of the young Prince Edward, the aged King restored to the Londoners their right of electing their Mayor and their Sheriffs and confirmed their privileges, although, as usual, the King's favour had to be bought with money. The first two elections following this concession appear to have passed quietly, but in ii^i, when the ex-Mayor, Walter Hervi, sought re-election, the old contentions between the more ' discreet ' citizens and the commoners broke out once more. The more 'discreet' were in favour of Philip le Tailleur, but the ' commons ' or mob of the City cried out, ' Nay, nay, we will have no one for Mayor than Walter Hervi '." The Aldermen at first asked for arbitration,' but as the King died at this moment they gave way and Hervi was elected. Hervi pursued the policy of Fitz Thomas. Fresh ordinances for various crafts were drawn up, and the position of the Craft ' Liber de Antiquis Legibus, translated Riley, pp. y8, 60, 6j. ^ Fitz Thedmar, Chron. of Mayors and Sheriffs, in Riley, p. 1J3. ' On the side of Hervi we find: Robert Gratefige, Robert Hauteyn, a Mercer (?), AUand le Hurer (Cap-maker), Bartholomew le Spicer (Grocer =), Henry de Wyncestre. Two apparently were members of Craft Gilds, and all, except perhaps the last, men apparently of the middle class 5 while those on the side of the Aldermen were apparently men of higher standing — John Adrian, late Mayor ; Henry le Waleys, subsequently Mayor ; Walter le Poter ; Henry de Coventre 5 Thomas de Basinge. Riley, Chronicles of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 1J7. London and her Gilds ii Gilds was improved. Yet Hervi did not succeed in getting re-elected again, and no sooner was his successor in power than the Charters he had granted were revoked as being solely for the benefit of the wealthy men of the trades to which they were granted, as also to the loss and undoing of all the other citizens, and the members of the crafts were ordered to pursue their crafts as before.' It is unfortunate that the actual trades to which Charters had been given are not mentioned, and it is somewhat confusing to find that Hervi was accused of favouring the wealthy men of the trades. We must, however, remember that the only account we have is from an avowed enemy, FitzThedmar, and his own statement that Hervi ' had, when accused, appealed ' to a great multitude of those trades to which he had granted Charters and to the populace,^ as well as the popular support which he evidently secured, furnishes the best answer to the charge that he favoured the rich.3 From the date of Edward I's return to England till the year 1285- we know nothing of the internal politics of London. Our interesting though partial chronicler, Fitz Thedmar, fails us, and there is no one to take his place adequately.** In that year, however, owing to the refosal of the then Mayor, TheGovern- Gregory de Rokesly, to appear, as Mayor, before the King's ™ent of Justices,^ then sitting at the Tower, he was deposed, and for T*"l°"j'^ r a Gustos, ' Riley, Chronicles of Mayors, pp. 170, 171. i28<-g8. = Ibid., p. 170. ^ Hervi declared that his object in becoming Mayor had been that he might support the poor against the rich, who wished to oppress them in the matter of tallages and expenditure of the City. Cf. Chronicles of Mayors and Sheriffs, p. 156. * Our authorities now are mainly: I. The Chronicles of Ed. I-II, Rolls Series, ed. W. Stubbs. 2. The series of Letter Books, now published under the title Letter Books, A to K : these are of especial value. 3 . Sharpe, Calendar of Wills in the Court of Husting. 4. Liber Albus, translated by Riley, j. Liber Custumarum, Rolls Series. 5 Rokesly held that he was not bound to appear for judgement beyond the Liberties of the City, unless he had received fully forty days' notice. Apparently the City wall passed through the precincts of the Tower, and all the part which lay to the west of the wall was therefore in Tower Ward, all to the east belonged to the special jurisdiction of the King. The Ward of Portsoken, however, lay IX Introduction True mean- ing of the past con- troversy. thirteen years the City was in tlie hands of a ' Gustos ', ' whilst the Sheriffs were sometimes appointed by the Exchequer, sometimes chosen by the citizens.'' It was not till lapS that the right of election was again restored to the City, when ilenry de Waleys was chosen Mayor by the Aldermen and twelve men selected by them from each Ward "— ' an important departure from the old close system,' says Dr. Stubbs, although, since the selection of the twelve lay in the hands of the Aldermen, this can scarcely be called a triumph of the elective principle. The exact meaning of the struggle that had been going on in London since the reign of Richard I is difficult to unravel. Some would represent it merely as one between the richer and outside the Tower to the east, and thus was also part of the City. Cf. Map in Kingsford's ed. of Stow, vol. ii; Coke, Institutes, iii. 13 f. It should, however, be understood that the privileges of Londoners to be tried in their own courts did not, since the disappearance of the ' Justiciar ', extend to criminal cases. The Charter of 1 2 Edward II promised that the King should not, except in cases of grave emergency, assign Justices to sit in any part of the Liberty of the City, except the Justices Itinerant who sat in the Tower, the Justices for gaol delivery who sat at Newgate, and for correction of errors at St. Martin's le Grand. By the Charter of Edward III the Mayor was constituted, cA- offi,ch, one of the Justices of gaol delivery at Newgate. In criminal cases the preliminary inquest of recognition was held before the Sheriffs or Coroner by a Jury of the Ward in which the offence had been committed, and the accused was either acquitted or presented for final trial to the Justices sitting in the Tower. Felons arrested in the City were committed to Newgate by the Sheriff to await the next gaol delivery at Newgate. No freeman could be arrested or punished except by the ofHcers of the City, and no freeman could be impleaded before the King's Marshal. Of civil cases the Sheriffs also had cognizance in their court. Appeals 'in error ' were returnable from that court to the Hustings Court of Common Pleas, and thence to the Justices or Commissioners sitting at St. Martin's le Grand. (This was a liberty originally belonging to the Dean and Chapter of Westminster, who in early days possessed a Court of Record, distinct from the City of London.) From these Justices the final appeal lay to the House of Lords. Since Henry VIII the Justices have sat at the Guildhall. No citizens could plead outside the City walls except in pleas of outside tenure. Pleas of escheats' of tenements within the City were to be pleaded before the Justices Itinerant at the Tower. Cf Pulling, Laws and Customs of the City of London, pp. 1 70 fF. ; Norton, Commentaries; Liber Albus, translated Riley,i. 44 ff.; Letter Books, ed. Sharpe, D, p. iv, 290 ; E, 41, 5^, 202, 244, 340 ; F, xxxv, 64. ' Sharpe, London and the Kingdom, i. 122 ; Riley, Liber Albus, pp. ij ff. ^ Norton, Commentaries, p. 87 ; Letter Book B, ii i. London and her Gilds 13 poorer citizens, or of the members of the Wards against their aristocratic Aldermen, who by this time often held some of the minor royal offices, such as Chamberlain, farmer of taxes, and the like ; ' others look upon it as the first move on the part of the Craft Gilds to gain control of the municipal government. It is not without significance that it is about this time that the Wards are no longer called by the names of their Aldermen, and that the Aldermen become in all cases, except in the case of Portsoken, where the office was held by the Prior of Holy Trinity, elected officers. Further, it is in 1285^ that we find the Aldermen acting with the aid of an elected council in each Ward, and, as just mentioned, twelve men selected by the Aldermen from each of their Wards taking part in the election of the Mayor in I2p8.'' All these indications might lead one to infer that the quarrel was nothing more than one between the ' magnates and the com- moners ', as Bishop Stubbs is inclined to think.^ Yet, on the other hand, the frequent mention of the Craft Gilds as the supporters of Fitz Thomas and of Hervi leads one to the con- clusion that these two men were attempting to organize the Crafts more thoroughly against the patrician party as represented by the Aldermen of the Wards, and, if so, we here see the begin- ning of the movement which before the end of the fourteenth century was to end in the triumph of the Gilds. Mr. Loftie,"* indeed, would have us believe that Henry, by his policy of grant- ing charters to the Gilds, first gave them the idea of corporate unity, which many of them were eventually to gain from the Crown. In any case it must be remembered that, though the distinction between the masters and the journeymen was not as yet so marked as it became in the fifteenth century, yet the real control of the Crafts always lay in the hands of the masters, and that the journeymen and apprentices had little power. ' Cf. note on Wards, p. 2, note 3. ^ It is of course trae that, as the Aldermen selected the twelve, they can scarcely be called elected. \ . . 3 Stubbs, Constitutional History, iii. j/i ; Unwin, Gilds and Companies of London, p. 6j. * Loftie, London, i. 60. 1^ Introduction Probably the real solution of the controversy is that we have here two aspects of the same question. The members of the Craft Gilds, whether rich or poor, were perforce residents in the Wards. They would therefore be equally interested in wresting the control of their Wards from the hands of the Aldermen, and at the same time of having a voice in the election of the Mayor, the Sheriffs, and the Common Council, while there are many indications which show that the Crafts were increasing in power. Dr. Stubbs says 'that municipal independence so far as it was based on the Gild must be regarded as the result of a series of infringements on the ancient rights of the free inhabitants '. This, though no doubt true of later times, would scarcely apply to this date. Even if the Craft Gilds were really at this time in the hands of the more well to do, they would at least represent more popular interests than the Aldermen, and the struggle may be called one of the mercantile and industrial against the aristocratic element. Moreover, the Gilds were then in the stage when, as Dr. Stubbs himself says in the same sentence, ' they stood for the protection of the weak '.' EarlyHistory It is upon the Gilds that we must now concentrate our atten- of the Gilds, tion. Here, therefore, will be a good opportunity for a brief review of their previous history and of the position they now held in London. The Gild was a universal institution in Mediaeval Western Europe, and indeed, under different forms, is to be found even in the East.^ It is, in fact, a natural social development in the direction of association, which followed or accompanied the weakening of the family tie, and was rendered all the more neces- sary because of the absence of a strong central government and of a uniform system of justice at that early date. In no country is the history of these Gilds more interesting and more enduring than in England, based as they w^ere on the ' Stubbs, Constitutional History, i. 419. We find an interesting parallel in the struggle in Flanders between the rich "■ poorters ' (' viri hereditarii ', ' ledi- gangers^, who had abandoned trade, and the smaller craftsmen, especially those of the woollen trade. C£ Pirenne, Belgique, i. 284. ^ For Eastern forms of Gilds, cf. Unwm, The Gilds and Companies of London, p. 2, and authorities there quoted. London and her Gilds if English love of local association, of self-government and self-help, and yet 'the English dislike to abrupt constitutional change obscures their rise and fall, while on the Continent the rule of the Crafts frequently corresponds to a definite period in the con- stitutional history of the towns '.' When we meet with the Gild in the twelfth century it has many aspects, social, religious, and economical, and it is unwise to look for any single origin for so complex an institution. The earliest Gilds of which we have any knowledge in England are the so-called Frith Gilds, of which one existed in London in the reign of Athelstane. This was an association partly for the purpose of maintaining the peace and for the suppression of theft, partly for mutual help, to which was attached the duty of pro- viding masses for the departed members of the Fraternity. Although its ordinances were enforced by the public authorities, it was probably not the creation of law, but was originally a voluntary association which came to be used as a part of the police organization,"" and in this respect it resembles the later Gilds which are constantly, often unconsciously, ' crossing the line which separates public from private functions, compulsory from voluntary association '. As no more is heard of this London Frith Gild it can scarcely have had any lasting influence on the municipal constitution. The same may be said of the Cnighten Gilds, of which the most interesting is that of London. This Gild, which held a charter from Edward the Confessor and claimed to have existed as early as the days of Cnut, was partly a religious and partly a social Gild. It was granted land and the soke of what became subse- quently the Ward of Portsoken, and was apparently composed of lesser Thanes, although at the time of its dissolution most of its fifteen members were Aldermen or relations of Aldermen. Possibly the Gild undertook the duty of defending the City, but there is no evidence to show that it formed any part of the ' Unwin, Industrial Organization, p. 15. = Cf. Stubbs's Charters, Judicia Civitatis Lundonne, p. 67; Liebermann, Geschichte der Angelsachsen, i. 173 ; Gross, Gild Merchant, i. 178 ; Unwin, Gilds and Companies of London, p. 19. For other Anglo-Saxon Gilds, which were piostly voluntary religious Fraternities, cf. Stubbs, Constit. Hist., i. 413. 1(5 Introduction government of the town, as Mr. Loftie would have us believe. It received Charters from William I, William II, and Henry I, and then in iii:r, with his consent, surrendered its land, its soke, and the church of St. Botolph to the Prior of Holy Trinity. Henceforth the Prior became the ex officio Alderman of the Ward and remained so until the Reformation.' Earliest The idea, therefore, of association in Fraternities or Gilds was Merchant ^gjl known in London, as elsewhere, before the Norman Con- c'^'f r\A 1 1 1, 190, ii9j 241, 242, 248; G, iv; H, xiii, J3; K, 167, 174; Ashley, Economic History, Bfe. I. ii, pp. 104 ff., II. i, p. 13 ; Stow, Survey of London, ed. Kingsford, ii. 3 19 ; Pil'cnne, Belgique, i. 2^7 ; La Hanse de Londres, Bruxelles, 1899. ' C£ Johnson, Disappearance of Small Landowner, p. 17, and authorities quoted there. = Trevelyan, Age of Wyclif. London and her Gilds X7 history during this troubled period should be difficult to explain. The notable advance in the position of the Gilds or Mysteries during the reign of Edward III, and the fact that the Mayors, the Sheriffs, and the Aldermen were now practically, though not necessarily, members of the more important Mysteries, had in- creased the pretensions of the Gilds. Accordingly, they now make an attempt to wrest from the Wards the right to elect the Common Council,' a body which by this time had definitely assumed the legislative and executive authority over the City. Thus in 135-1 and again in 135-1 the thirteen greater Mysteries were summoned to elect members of their Crafts to act as a Com- mon Council.'' The attempt was premature. In 135-3 the right of electing the Common Council was temporarily restored to the Wards, a triumph which was very possibly due to the increase in the number of the parish Fraternities not connected with any Craft.3 The claim of the Gilds to elect the Common Council was, however, soon to be renewed. ' The first list of Common Council men that exists is that of 1347. They were then 133 in number. Riley, Memorials, p. liii. ' Letter Book F, pp. 237, 238. The Grocers The Mercers • elect six Representatives each. The Fishmongers (Pessoners) The Drapers The Goldsmiths The Woolmongers (Laners) The Vintners The Skinners (Pelleters) The Saddlers (Celers) The Taylors The Cbrdwainers The Butchers The Ironmongers (Ismongers) two Representatives. Of these, three (the Goldmiths, the Skinners, the Tailors) had obtained Royal Charters, three (the Drapers, the Vintners, the Fishmongers) were shortly to obtain them, and nine were subsequently counted among the twelve Greater Livery Companies. 3 On Parish Fraternities c£ Unwin. The struggle of the Gilds to get the election of the municipal officers and the Common Council is paralleled by that which was going on about this time in Flanders, Brabant, and Lilge, only with these differences: (i) Abroad, the richer Merchants appear to have been *-elect four Representatives each. Premature attempt on the part of the Crafts to elect the Common Council of the City. i8 Introduction London in- At this moment the municipal history of London became volyed in involved in the wider political history of England. The dis- political content, which had been gaining strength during the declining wsues o t e ^^^^^ of Edward III, came to a climax in the ' Good Parliament ' of 1375. Lord Latimer and three Aldermen' were impeached for malversation of the finances ; and one of them. Alderman Peche, was also accused of obtaining, with the connivance of the Mayor and other Aldermen, a monopoly in sweet wines.'' This Renewed at- gave an excuse for attacking the system under which the members tempt of the of the Common Council were elected by the Wards, and for Crafts to demanding that they should once more be elected by the Crafts as Common ^^^^ ^^^ ^^^" in 135-1 and i^j-z. Council. The Mayor, John Warde, a Grocer, in virtue of the powers given to the citizens by the late charter to remedy 'hard or defective customs V acceded to the demand. At a gathering of the representatives of forty-one Crafts, which met on August i, 1 375, it was decided that in fiiture the Common Council should be formed of six, four, or two representatives elected for a year from the ' sufficient ' Mysteries according to their size ; that the Mayor and Sheriffs should be elected by this Council; and that no member of the Common Council should hold the office of collector or assessor of talliages. In accordance with this resolution, on August % 1 376, a Council was forthwith formed of 15-7 members, returned by forty-seven Mysteries, who bound themselves by oath to preserve for each Mystery its reasonable customs. The King also confirmed the rule of 131^ insisting on the annual election of Aldermen.* Mr. Unwin is of opinion that John of Northampton and the organized in a Gild Merchant. In London there was no Gild Merchant, (x) The distinction between the trading Gilds and artisan Gilds is not so marked in England as abroad. Indeed, many of the English Gilds included men who were at once traders and makers of goods. Cf. Pirenne, Belgique, ii. 43, 5 i fF. ' Richard Lyons, a Vintner, Adam de Bury, a Skinner (he had been removed from the Mayoralty ten years before by the King's orders. Letter Book G, p. 199), and John Peche, a Fishmonger. = Letter Book, p. 318. 3 j ^ Edward IIL * Letter Book H, p. v and pp. 39, 41, j8. For the number of the members of the Common Council from this time until 1838, c£ Printed Minutes, Common Council, Jan. 23, 1840. London and her Gilds 19 non-Victualling Gilds were the chief movers in this change, which gave the election of the Common Council to the Mysteries. No doubt he was subsequently accused of it, but the evidence seems scarcely to bear out the charge. John of Northampton was not Mayor at this moment as his accusers alleged, but John Warde the Grocer, while Walworth and Brembre, both of them also members of the Victualling Gilds, were among the deputation who informed the King that the change had been decided upon ' to prevent the tumult arising from large gatherings'.' It is true that the subsequent restoration of the right of electing the Common Council to the Wards in 1384 was effected when Brembre was Mayor; but there was good reason for a return to the old custom, since it was found that, as long as the election was in the hands of the Mysteries, their quarrels had been intensi- fied. Nor again does it seem likely that the system of election by the Gilds was more fevourable to the popular party. No doubt a number of the smaller Mysteries shared the privilege, yet it must be remembered that the situation had changed since the thirteenth century. In the Gilds themselves the real power had now fallen to the richer masters or employers, and the journeymen and apprentices had no voice in the election, while, on the other hand, the Aldermen were no longer semi-hereditary magnates but the elected representatives of their Wards. It may, indeed, be said that, inasmuch as membership of a Gild was now a neces- sary condition of ' freedom of the City ', all the members of the Wardmoots would be Gildsmen, but the excuse given for taking the right of election from the Wards, that it led 'to tumults arising from large gatherings ', would seem to show that the meetings of the Wards for the purpose were not confined to the rich, which would be practically the case when only the representatives of the Gilds attended. Dr. Stubbs would there- fore seem to be right when he says that the change excluded ^ Unwin, Gilds, p. 131 ; Sharpe, Letter Book H, xxviii, p. 3^. Mr. Unwin has, however, kindly pointed out to me that, although Northampton was not Mayor, yet his party may have been strong enough to get the alteration made, especially as his ' Jubile Book ' of Reform seems to have appeared at this time. The parties were evidently pretty evenly balanced. Thus Warde was succeeded as Mayor by Adam Stable, a Mercer, in 137^, and Northampton was Sheriff in that year. go Introduction Wyclif and Lancaster. Quarrel be- tween the Victualling and other Crafts. a considerable body of citizens from municipal power,' and that the growth of the Gilds, from this date onwards at least, was accompanied by an invasion of the rights of the free citizen. If this be so, it seems unlikely that Northampton, who posed as a reformer, would have specially associated himself with their cause. All these arguments tend to show that all the Gilds, though they were jealous enough of each other, were interested in controlling the election to the Common Council as well as that of the Mayor and Sheriffs. Finally, there is some reason to beheve that the quarrel between Northampton and his rivals did not arise on this question, and that the close association of John of Northampton and the non-Victualling Gilds with John of Gaunt had not been formed in 1376^- In the spring of 1 3 77, however, the peace of the City was disturbed by the controversy concerning Wyclif Lancaster, who had now regained power, had, owing to his opposition to William of Wykeham, made himself the champion of the reformer, and when, in February, Wyclif appeared in St. Paul's to answer his accusers, the Duke, accompanied by Earl Percy the Marshal, stood by him. The matter ended in a riot, which was increased by the rumour that a Bill had been, or was about to be, introduced into Parliament to place the government of the City in the Marshal's hands, and that he had imprisoned a citizen. In consequence of this riot the Mayor, Adam Staple, a Mercer, was deposed and Brembre, a Grocer, was elected in his place, apparently atjhe instigation of John of Gaum (March 1377). So far the City appears to have been of one mind. All the Crafts, it would seem, had been concerned in getting the election of the Common Council into their hands ; the majority of the citizens were on the side of the Church against Wyclif, probably because of their hostility to Lancaster ; and all were indignant at the attempted infringement of their rights of self-government. But now a question arose which divided the City into two camps. Edward III had by Letters Patent (December 1 376), in answer to a petition of the City, confirmed its privileges and forbidden strangers to sell goods to other foreigners to be sold again, until the question had been settled by the next Parliament, ' Stubbsj Const. Hist., iii. J75. London and her Gilds gi saving always that Lords of the realm might buy wholesale of any one for their own use, and saving the liberties of the merchants of the Hanse.' Though all the Crafts were more or less interested in securing the monopoly of their own particular trade," that of the Victualling Gilds, which supplied the City with its daily food, was more severely and generally felt by the consumer. Especially was this the case with regard to fish, which, either fresh or salted, was the ordinary food or the poor throughout the year, and of all classes during Lent.^ Thus there arose a party representing the non- ' Liber Albus, i. 492—3. The changes with regard to Merchant Strangers from this date to the fall of Richard II are so frequent that for clearness' sake I tabulate them here. In December 1377, during the Mayoralty of Brembre, Richard II confirmed the Charter of his father and forbade strangers to sell to other foreigners or by retail. The Parliament of October 1378, Stat, of Gloucester, z Ric. II, c. i, annulled this Charter and gave strangers the right to sell by wholesale or retail. In 1381, during the Mayoralty of Northampton, Parliament by the Stat. 6, Ric. II, cc. ix, X, forbade Victuallers to hold judicial office if another fit person could be foimd, and allowed foreign Victuallers to sell by wholesale or retail. In 1383, during the third Mayoralty of Brembre, the Stat. 7 Ric. II, c. xi, repealed the former Statute, and Richard II issued an inspeximus Charter restricting the trade of Merchant Strangers. In 1388 the Merciless Parliament, under the control of the Lords Appellant, declared free trade throughout the Kingdom. In May 1389 Richard, in his attempt to gain the support of the Victuallers, confirmed the privileges of the Fishmongers. It will be thus seen that Richard was generally on the side of the Victualling Gilds, while the non- Victualling Gilds were supported by Parliament. " The conduct of the non- Victuallers is certainly contradictory, for while objecting to the monopoly of the Victuallers they are protecting their own. C£ petition of Drapers and Weavers, Letter Book H, pp. 91, 94. ^ The 'surveying of victuals ' had always been a chief concern of the municipal authorities, who had, by their Assizes of Bread, Ale, Wine, and regulations with regard to other victuals, especially those of flesh and fish, attempted to maintain ' a reasonable price ', as well as to ensure that the quality was good. For this purpose the victualling Crafts had been subjected to more interference than was the case with regard to the other Gilds, and to prevent the Mayor or other officer of the City from abusing his authority they were especially forbidden to deal in victuals by gross or retail. Cf. Assize of the Mayor, 1177. 'No retail dealer of com, fish, poultry or victuals shall buy victuals before the hour of gx Introduction Victualling Crafts, who, with little consistency, voiced the popular discontent ; and hence a violent dispute which was to disturb the City for several years. The leader of this so-called Reforming party was the Draper, John of Northampton, Alderman of Cordwainer Street Ward and subsequently of Dowgate. Of his immediate followers one William Essex was, like himself, a Draper, two were Mercers, and two more hailed from the Taylors' and Goldsmiths' Gilds respectively, while he found much support from the Saddlers, the Cordwainers, the Haberdashers, and members of other lesser Crafts. John of Northampton accused the Victualling Gilds, and more especially the Fishmongers and the Grocers,' of enhancing the prices of their imported food-stuffs.'' At once the hostility of the Victualling Gilds was aroused. Led by Nicholas Brembre, a Grocer, the newly appointed Mayor, William Walworth, a Fishmonger,^ and John Philpot, a Grocer, they were at this moment attempting still further to increase the area of their monopoly by bringing the vill of South- wark, which had just been granted to the City by the King, under the closer jurisdiction of the municipal authorities, because there was a market at the Southwark end of London Bridge ' where many bakers and other foreign victuallers and false Prime, nor before the reputable men of the city have bought.' Letter £ook A, p. 217. Ashley, Econ. History, Bk. II, c. i, p. 30. In the reign of Edward II a long controversy had arisen as to whether the Fishmongers might sell by retail on any quay even at Fishmongers' Wharf, or in their shops, their opponents urging that fish should be sold wholesale in the boats of those who brought them, and not at any quay, and that the markets (Brugger- strete, Olde fishe Street and Le Stokkes) were the only proper place for sale by retail. They also disputed the legality of their Hallmoot. The Mayor, Hamo de Chigwell, found against the Fishmongers, but the Justices decided that they might sell by retail as well as wholesale in their shops. Liber Cust., pp. 38 j fF. ' The Grocers or ' Grossers ', i. e. those who engrossed (buying wholesale to keep and sell at a higher price) had just formed themselves into a Fraternity and the Fishmongers hadjust obtained a Royal Charter. ° For a somewhat similar struggle over the privileges of the Victualling Gilds in Florence, cf. Doren, Florentiner Wirthschaftsgeschichte, ii. \\6. ^ These Fishmongers were divided into Fishmongers and Stock Fishmongers, each with their Hall-moot. They were not united till i Jjtf. Stow, Survey, ed. Kingsford, i. 31^. London and her Gilds 3 g workers at divers trades repair, who eschew the punishment of the City '.' Thus London became divided between those who favoured the Victuallers and their opponents. John of Northampton, who was a supporter of Wyclif, joined the cause of Lancaster and raised the cry that the price of the people's food was in danger of being enhanced owing to the monopohes of the Victuallers, while the leaders of the Victualling Gilds placed themselves on the side of orthodoxy, and declared that the trading privileges of Lon- doners were being threatened by foreign merchants, and their freedom attacked by the Duke.'' If the lower classes could have had their say, possibly the party of Northampton might have won. For Wyclif probably would find his supporters among them, and the rise in the price of victuals, and more especially of fish, would touch them closely. But in the counsels of the Gilds they had little part. All the trading masters cared much more for the monopoly of their own business than for the price of commodities ; and the cry that the privileges of the City were being endangered by the hated John of Gaunt and by the ' stranger ' found even wider support. When, therefore, the elections came on in October 1 377, the Victuallers swept the board. In the previous March eight Fishmongers, one Grocer, and one Vintner, that is ten belonging to the Victualling Gilds, had been elected to the Common Council, a large proportion considering that the number of Gilds was at this date certainly above fifi:y. Now, in October, Nicholas Nicholas Brembre, the Grocer, was re-elected Mayor. At the same time, ^''^""^r^ ^^- Walworth and Sibylle two Fishmongers, Philpot a Grocer, and Mayor Oc- ' Petition, Rolls of Pari., ii. -^66. It was only the ' vill ' or Gildable Manor tober 1377. of Sonthwark that was thus granted by Edward III. Edward IV amplified this by allowing the citizens to hold a fair there with a Couit of ' Pie Powder '. But it was not till l JJo that the other two Manors, the King's Manor and the Great Liberty Manor, and the Borough were bought by the City, and formed into the Ward of Bridge Without. Sharpe, London and Kingdom, i. 443. ^ The first notice of the quarrel is in May i J77, when five Common Council- men, of whom two were Mercers and three were severally a Draper, a Goldsmith, and a Taylor, were removed for betraying the secrets of the Council and for being remiss in their duties. The two Mercers, More and Norbury, were subse- quently the stanch supporters of Northampton. Letter Book H, p. 6^. Richard II succeeded his father June i377. 34 Introduction Carlille a ' Spicer ', all of them supporters of Brembre, were returned as Members of Parliament. Their opponents, indeed, succeeded in getting Nicholas Twyford, a Goldsmith, elected as Sheriff, but when, in the following March, he attempted to protect one of his party, who had been concerned in a quarrel between the Pepperers and the Goldsmiths, he was removed from office till he had made submission to the Mayor and had promised to find sureties of indemnity.' For four years the Victuallers ruled the City." The richer members secured the support of the young King by lavish loans,^ ' Letter Book H, pp. j8, 61, 77. It is noticeable that when Northampton becanke Mayor he was relieved from this recognizance. Ibid. <)^. ^ John Philpot, a Grocer, succeeded Brembre in October 1378 ; John Hadley, a Pepperer, was elected October 1379; William Walworth, a Fishmonger, in 13 80. The majority of the Aldermen during Brembre's mle also belonged to the Victiialling Gilds^ but the number of those belonging to the Grocers has been exaggerated owing to a mistake of Herbert in his History of the Livery Com- pames. The actual numbers of the Aldermen during these years of strife belortging to the chief Victualling and non- Victualling Gilds are as follows : Mayor. Aldermen. Aldermen. 1377 Brembre, Grocer 9 7 1378 Philpot, Grocer 12 10 1379 Had ey, Pepperer II 8 1380 Walworth, Fishmonger 13 8 138 1 Northampton, Draper 11 9 1382 Northampton 10 7 1383 Brembre, Grocer 8 13 1384 Brembre 12 8 138 J Brembre 12 Fishmongers, 7 Drapers, Mercers, 138^ Exton, Goldsmith 12 Grocers, or 8 or Goldsmiths. 1387 Exton 12 Vintners. 7 1388 Twyford, Goldsmith 10 9 1389 Venour, Grocer 9 10 1390 Bamme, Goldsmith 10 1 1 1 39 1 Hende, Draper 10 II 1392 William Standen, Grocer 9 12 1393 Hadley, Grocer 9 10 1394 Fresshe 9 12, Cf Beaven, Aldermen, vol. i, p. 360. ' Brembre, Walworth, Phil{)6t, and Hadley lent £10,000 between them. Letter Book H, xii. London and her Gilds 3 5* and Walworth and Philpot were made ' treasurers ' for the sums voted in Parliament. In return the young King confirmed the Charter of his father against the aliens, excepting, however, the merchants of the English Province of Aquitaine (Dec. ini)? ^'^^ declared the citizens free firom the Marshal's jurisdiction. Armed with this Charter the Mayor issued a precept to eight of the principal Gilds, the Grocers, Mercers, Drapers, fish- mongers. Goldsmiths, Skinners, Ironmongers, and Vintners, bid- ding them elect searchers to see that no merchant strangers sold their goods by retail within the City and suburbs, that they sold by wholesale only to those of the franchise, and that they lodged with some citizen. Restrictions were also imposed on the sale of cloth by foreigners, and they were forbidden to meddle with the Craft of firee Weavers. At the same time the privi- leges of the German Steelyard were suspended.' This policy of monopoly was, however, difficult to carry out in the divided condition of public opinion; and the difficulty is well illus- trated in the question of the Weavers which arose at this moment. The Weavers had been much annoyed by the privileges accorded by Edward III to the Flemings and Brabanters, and their grievances had just been answered. Accordingly, in August 1378, they sent a petition to a Committee of the Council asking that the aliens, 'being for the most part exiled from their own country as notorious malefactors \ should be com- pelled to place themselves under the rule of the English Weavers, who should regulate the price of their labour. As* however, it was not to the interest of the Drapers or Cloth- workers to allow the Weavers to control the aliens, since they too employed them, and it might forfeit the King's support if the privileges granted by his &her to the Flemings and Bra- banters were withdrawn, the City authorities contented them- selves with advising the Weavers to wait till ' some deceit ' on the part of the foreigners should furnish an excuse for further measures. In July 1380 the question was finally settled by the foreign Weavers agreeing to make common search as to the number of looms belonging to either party and to pay their ' Letter Book H, pp. 90, 91, 94, 9f . 36 Introduction share of the ' ferni ' of twenty marks two shillings which the English Weavers owed to the King/ But the dominant party had yet to deal with John of Gaunt. In October 1378 a Parliament was summoned at Gloucester, probably to remove it from the influence of the rich merchants who had lent so much money to the King. The Charter against the ' strangers ' was then revoked, and the management of the subsidy was taken from the hands of Walworth and Philpot. In the same month, however, Philpot succeeded Walworth in the Mayoralty, and the Victualling party, fearing the loss of trade which would result from the absence of Par- liament from the City, succeeded, by bribing influential people,^ in getting the next Parliament summoned to Westminster in I37P- 111 ^hfi following year the Parliament of 1380 imposed the fatal Poll Tax which was the occasion for the Peasants' The Revolt. The part which London took in that revolt has never Peasants been cleared up. No doubt, as is usual in such cases, a host of rufiians seized the opportunity to wreak their vengeance on Society, and there were plenty of smaller journeymen and apprentices, always a turbulent class, who had personal or other grievances to avenge. Yet it is remarkable that there was little pilfering, and that in most cases the destruction and the murders may be assigned to a definite motive. Amongst these may especially be noted the hatred of Lancaster, the dislike of the Marshalsea, and the hatred of the foreign Fleming. ^ Now these were the principles more especially represented by the Victualling Gilds who were at this moment in power under Walworth, the Fishmonger Mayor.- There is no reason to believe that Walworth himself had any dealings with the rebels, but it must be admitted that the conduct of three Aldermen, all of his party, is highly suspicious. John Horn, the Fishmonger, gave the rebels a royal standard to unfurl on their march; Alderman SybiUe, another Fishmonger, opened London Bridge to them; and Tonge, a Vintner, admitted them to Aldgate. ^ Letter Book H, pp. 94, pj, iji. ^ Ibid., pp. 113, 124; Stat. Gloucester, 2 Ric. TI. c. i. ^ For an account of the attack on London, cf. Oman, The Great Revolt ; Reville, Soulevement des Travailleurs en 138 t. London and her Gilds 37 Yet these men after a long trial were finally acquitted, when in 1384 their party was once more in power: and Tonge, who was one of the City's representatives in Parliament at the time, was re-elected in 1388.' The conduct of these prominent members of the Victualling party has puzzled historians." It has been left to Mr. Unwin to suggest that the true explanation of their conduct is to be found in ' the relation of parties within London ' during the six preceding years.^ He reminds us that at the moment ' the hated foreigner had been reinstated in all his privileges and the monopoly of the City retailer withdrawn . . . and that John of Gaunt, the author of these calamities, had still the lea,ding influence in the national councils. If they could use the force of popular discontent ... to strike a decisive blow at the Duke, to settle old scores with the Marshalsea, to make an end of the foreigner, and to place their leaders in the position they were naturally qualified to occupy of confidential advisers to the King, a little interval of disturbance would be a small matter to pay for so many advantages.' But they had overshot their mark. Although Walworth was Fall of the knighted for his prompt action in striking down Wat Tyler and Victuallers, in suppressing the revolt, his party were fiitally compromised f^o^ij°„p. by the conduct of Sybille, Tonge, and Horn, and by the atro- ton, a cities of the rebels. In the foUowing autumn, October 13 81, Draper, John of Northampton, the Draper and representative of the elected non- Victualling Gilds, was elected Mayor and remained in office ^ Y^*^' two years, iuthough he never had a majority of his party among the Aldermen, he proceeded at once to take vigorous measures against his opponents. Many of the charges subse- quently brought against Northampton are obviously false. It is therefore difiicult to discriminate. But it is certain from the terms of a petition sent to Parliament that he was princi- pally concerned in attacking the privileges of the Victualling Gilds, more especially those of the Fishmongers and stock Fishmongers, and in spite of the opposition of Exton, one of ' Rgville, Soulevement des Travailleurs, p. 199 5 Letter Book H,pp. 319, 334. ^ Cf. Oman, The Great Revolt, p. 18, note i. ^ Unwin, Gilds, p. 142. 3 8 Introduction the members of Parliament for the City, who, though a Gold- smith, was a personal enemy of Northampton, an Act was pssed which allowed foreign Victuallers to sell their wares in the City by wholesale or retail, forbad members of Victualling Gilds to hold a judicial office in London and other towns if another fit person could be found,' and ordered them to abandon all trade while holding such oiEce. Northampton also bade the Fishmongers bring their Charters to the Guildhall to be inspected; he exacted from them the admission that their trade was no Craft, and consequently not entitled to rank as a ' Mystery ' at all, and thus ' brought it about that those who were before superiors were now scarcely admitted amongst the inferiors '. The new Mayor also compiled a 'Jubile' Book'' with the object of annulling those ordinances of the City to which he objected. The views of the Fishmongers as to this policy are well illustrated by the language of the Alderman Carlille, a Grocer. He cursed the strangers and said it was a mockery that such rebels should be selling fish within the City and that he would be better pleased that a City Fishmonger should make ;^2o, than such a rebel i.od? Northampton also posed as a reformer of morals. He not only took proceedings against usurers, a measure peculiarly distastefiil to the rich members of the Victualling Gilds, but proceeded to call the other trades to account. Brewers and Bakers were ordered to sell farthing-worths of beer and bread. Priests were only to charge one farthing for a Mass, and a special issue of ferthings was made so that they should have no excuse for not giving change, and if a priest made this excuse the fee need not be paid.* Fortune-teUers and quacks were sent to the pillory together with those who dared slander the Mayor.' Nor were his opponents spared. Philpot was removed from his aldermanry, ' Stat. 6 Ric. II. cc. ix, x (1382). == The book was so called because it appeared in 137^-7, the Jubilee of Edward Ill's accession. ' Letter Book H, xxviii-xxxi, xli. 198-100, no; Powell and Trevelyan, p. 30 ; Riley, Memorials, p. 468. ■• Letter Book H, pp. 176, 183, 189. = Riley, Memorials, pp. 4JJ ff. London and her Gilds 59 and Strode, the Common Serjeant, was deprived of certain apart- ments which had been granted him for life by Brembre.' Such violent measures as these, however desirable, not un- Fall of naturally made the reforming Mayor unpopular, especially as his Northamp- election for two years in succession was contrary to regulations ^°?*- "^^^ lately established, and caused a reaction. At the next election his ^tu'i^ "o" opponent, Brembre, was again successful (October 1383), while power, Oct. Walworth and Philpot and two other Victuallers were returned 1383. to Parliament. Northampton and his party, declaring that Brembre had gained his election by force, unwisely betook themselves to riot and conspiracy, which gave their enemies an opportunity to strike. John Constantyn, a Cordwainer, was tried and beheaded, and Northampton, foolishly demanding that his trial should be postponed in the absence of John of Gaunt, was condemned to death, although by the intervention of the ' good Queen Anne ' of Bohemia, the wife of Richard II, his sentence was commuted fcr imprisonment in Tintagel Castle.^ The Victuallers had won once more and for the next five years re- tained their supremacy .^ Forthwith the policy of Northampton was reversed. Victuallers were to be allowed to hold judicial office ; the King in an ' In- speximus ' Charter again restricted the trade of the merchant strangers, and in 1388 the ' Jubile' Book was burnt.* It is, however, to be noted that one of the measures of Brembre 's Election of second Mayoralty was the restoration of the right of electing the the Common Common Council to the Wards (1384.). It seems not unlikely s^o^jto'^jh that the question as to the electoral basis of the Common Council wards, was connected with the growth of religious and social Fraternities not connected with any particular trade. That the number of such Gilds was great is proved by the Gild certificate of 1 3 op. ' Letter Book H, xxxii, xxxiii. ^ There are many references to John of Northampton in the Patent Rolls ; cf. 1371, pp. 312, 4^4, 470, H. 2. Northampton was no low demagogue, but a wealthy man. Besides the Manor of Shoreditch he held much property in the City. Cf. Patent Rolls, 1384, pp. 462, 4^3, 472, 474, ^16, J24, J31, ^ Brembre was re-elected in 1384 and 138J, and Nicolas Exton, a supporter of Brembre though a Goldsmith, in 1385 and 1387. ♦ Stat. 6 Ric. II. c.ix (1383) ; Letter Book H, p. 222. 40 Introduction The Alder- men elected by the Wards. The Mayor is to be elected by the Common Council and other ' suf- ficient men'. In any case the system of election by the Craft Gilds, established in 137'^j ^ati "o^ worked well. It had only exaggerated the jealousy and strife between the Crafts, and for some years at- tempts had been made to find some remedy. Accordingly, in July 1384, a Common Council of 267 members decided that a return should be made to the old system of election by the Wards. Each Ward was to send from six to two members ac- cording to its size. To prevent any Mystery having too great a weight in the Common Council it was further enacted that no Mystery should have more than eight of its members on the Council at the same time.' Thus the constitution of the Common Council was finally settled in the form in which it has since remained.^ It may be questioned whether the importance of the con- troversy has not been exaggerated. As stated above, no one could be a member of a Ward unless he were a Gildsman, and although it is true that journeymen would, as members of their Wardmoot, have a voice in the election of the Common Council, as a matter of feet the Common Council has S'ince that date usually been composed of the leading members of the more important Gilds. No alteration was made as to the election of Aldermen.^ They continued to be elected, as by the Charters of Edward II and Edward III (1315, 1376), by the Wards, and, until the year 13P4, they were to be elected annually and not to be eligible for re-election. Since that date, however, they have held their oiBce for life, if not removed for some reasonable excuse-^ Meanwhile the election of the Mayor and the Sheriffs, as well as of the Parliamentary representatives for the City, remained in ' Letter BookH, p. 227 ; Lib. Albus, translated by Riley, p. 37. ^ In 1389 it is true the Mayor and Aldermen (without the Common Council) resolved that they should themselves elect a certain number from each Ward. But it is doubtful whether the resolution was ever put into effect. ^ As to the qualification for Aldermen, till 1430 they had to be honest and discreet men. In that year they had to be freemen by birth, apprenticeship, or patrimony. In 1434, since admission by patrimony had become very lax, it was ordered that strangers were no longer to be admined to the freedom by patrimony. ■* Rot. Pari., iii. 317. London and her Gilds 41 the hands of the Common Council ' with as many other sufficient men of the city as they might think necessary '.' It is usually said that this ordinance left the election of the City officials and Parliamentary representatives in the hands of the Gilds. But though it is true that henceforth the Gilds did enjoy considerable influence, and that, until the year 1^49, there is no instance of a Mayor being elected who was not a member of one of the more powerful Gilds, yet it is to be noted that the ordinance makes no specific mention of the Gilds or of Gildsmen.^ The long controversy, therefore, which had lasted for some eight years, did not seriously modify the civic constitution. Its importance lies chiefly in the graphic illustrations which it gives us of the internal life of the City, and of the relations of the Gilds to one another and to the political parties of the day. The quarrels which had rent the City did not end with the Survival of the quarrel ' Letter Book, p. vii. ^V^^^" ^^^ ^ It is curious that when in 1376 the Common Council was elected by the Victualling Mysteries, it alone was summoned to the election of the Mayor, but that from ^. "°,?~ the date when the Common Council was to be elected by the Wards, we often ^ic uaiung hear of an ' immense commonalty ' being summoned as well as the Common *' Council and the discreet men. In the year 1404 an ordinance commanded that, ' because of the tumult caused by apprentices and servants, no one was to enter the Guildhall at the time of election, and no one was to be summoned, except they be of the Common Council or of the more sufficient men of the city '. The rule was apparently not kept, since we often hear again of an immense commonalty being summoned, and sometimes, as in 1441, there is not even a specific mention of the Common Council or of the discreet men being summoned at all. Thus apparently the question as to who should be summoned lay with the Mayor for the time being. It is also to be remembered that in 140^ the Aldermen for the first time asserted that the right of the Commoners (whether they were members of the Common Council or no) was limited to the nomination of two fit persons, who had served as Aldermen and Sheriffs, and that the final selection between these two lay with the Mayor and Aldermen alone. This eventually became the rule, while, by the ordinances of the Common Council in the seventh and fifteenth years of Edward IV, the discretionary power of the Mayor in the matter of summons was put an end to, it being then enacted that, besides the Common Council, only the Masters and Wardens of the greater Companies and honest men of the Mysteries coming in their best liveries (i. e. of the livery) were to be present, Cf. Letter Book I, p. Jj ; Liber Albus, p. 19 ; Letter Book K, pp. 27 j note, 288; Norton's Commentaries, pp. ii6, 117. For earlier regulations. Letter Book F, p. 304 ; G, p. 2^j. 1603 ■! G 4^ Introduction Richard gradually alienates the support of the Londoners. Mayoralty of Brembre in \i%6. In the year 1387 Brembre was violently accused by the Mercers, the Drapers,' and others of the non- Victualling Gilds of securing the election ' through debate and stronger partie ', and of accroaching the royal authority by using force to overawe the citizens. As the reign proceeded the Victualling Gilds, who had always been favoured by the King, now became more definitely a royalist party, while their oppo- nents supported the 'Lords Appellant'. In 1388 the Merci- less Parliament, then under the control of the Appellants, condemned Brembre to execution for treason, and to please the non-Victualling Gilds, who then held the Mayoralty in the person of Twyford a Goldsmith, once more declared free trade throughout the kingdom.'' Even after this date traces of the old contest may be seen in the disputed election in 1 3 8p between WiUiam Venour, a Grocer, who was elected, and Adam Bamme, a Goldsmith, and also in the succession of Mayors till the close of the reign who were members now of one group now of another.^ In May igSp Richard II took the Government into his own hands. The King and the Lords Appellant were nominally reconciled, and for eight years Richard ruled with astounding consideration. Yet in 1392, when John Hende, a Draper, was Mayor, a dispute arose with the King, either over the demand for a sum of money, or over a City riot. The Mayor and Sheriffs were imprisoned, the City was deprived of its liberties, and the wrath of the King was only assuaged by the payment of a fine of ^10. By this high-handed act Richard alienated even his sup- porters, and when, in 135)7, he, who had been called 'the Londoner's King ', made his bold attempt at absolutism, the fevour of the Londoners was finally lost by his renewed extortions. In vain the King at the last moment tried to win the support of his old allies, the Fishmongers, by restoring to them their privilege of monopoly.* They did not move ; perhaps they dared not. For a Goldsmith, Drew Barantyn, was Mayor, and he it was who welcomed Henry of Lancaster when he approached the City.^ ' Cf. Petition of the MercerSj Herbert, i. 39 ; Petition of the Drapers, Appendix, Rot. Pari., iii. zi^-6, ' 1 1 Ric. II. c. vii. 3 Letter Book H, Introd. liii. * Letter Book H, pp. 447-8. = Letter Book H, Introd. liii-lvii. London and her Gilds 43 The close connexion between current politics and the quarrels among the Gilds finds an interesting parallel in the history of Flanders under the Arteveldts.' But whereas abroad this is no uncommon feature, in England it is exceptional. As a rule the English Gilds took little part in rival politics and were rarely- divided on such issues, and to this difference in a great measure may be attributed the long life of the English Gild. The condition of the towns, and more especially of London, The Inquiry throughout the reign of Richard II had, however, been so full of of 1388. turbulence, ' rumours, co vines, congregations, and affrays ', that all parties were convinced of the necessity, if possible, of controlling, if not reducing the number of the Gilds. Accordingly, the Merciless Parliament had demanded an inquiry. In November 1388 ^ writs were issued to the Sheriffs of Counties and of London ordering 'all Masters and Wardens of Mysteries and Crafts to bring their charters and letters patent into Chancery, and all other Masters of Gilds and Fraternities to make return as to the nature of their foundation and particulars of their customs, privileges and property '. This action on the part of Parliament and the central authorities was but one part of the movement in the direction of greater central control, whether municipal or national, over the various smaller communities which found its climax in the Tudor period.3 The first Writ applied to those Gilds which, beyond their social and religious aims, controlled the various trades and crafts of the City; the second referred to unchartered associations formed solely for religious or social purposes. No returns to the first Writ survive (if they were ever made) and only thirty-one to the second.* These pleaded that their objects were purely ' Cf. Ashley, J., The Arteveldts. = Letter Book G, p. 3 3 (J. ^ Unwin, p. i j J. It is in the reign of Richard II that we also meet with the earliest attempts of journeymen or yeomen to form Fraternities of their own, which became a serious question in the fifteenth century. Cf. Riley, Memorials, 49 J, the Cordwainers, 1387 ; ^42, the Saddlers, 1396. * The total number of returns for the whole of England was 4^2. Cf. Toulmin Smith, Gilds j Clare Market Review, published by the London School of Economics, i. 67. Cf. the return made by the Religious Fraternity of the Drapers, Appendix, Vol. I^ iv. The majority of these Gilds had no connexion with any particular trade. In the wills of this date, to be found in Sharpe's Calendar of 44 Introduction The Gilds press for Charters from the Crown. social and religious and had no political meaning, whicli appears to have been the case, since their ordinances refer to the govern- ment of the Society, and for the rest are concerned with the relief of poor members and with the singing of dirges or masses for the departed. In any case the inquiry was not followed by any definite action, except that in ijpi a statute forbad any Gild to acquire property in mortmain, as they had before, without the royal licence.' Nevertheless the Gilds were not unnaturally alarmed, especially since in the same Parliament petitions had been brought forward asking that not only the giving of ' livery ' by an individual to his retainers, but also the giving of ' livery ''^ under colour of fraternity, or any other association, should be forbidden under severe penalties. In the Act 7 Henry IV, c. 14, which was finally passed and which forbad the giving of liveries, 'the Gilds, Fraternities, and people of Mysteries of cities and boroughs that be founded to a good intent' were exempted. Nevertheless, for fiarther security the Gilds in future generally obtained a licence from the Crown.^ Meanwhile several Gilds strove to gain a fiiller confirmation of their privileges. During the remaining years of Richard II four Wills, we find members of different trades making bequests to the same religious Gild. But the Fraternity of the Drapers is one of the few interesting exceptions. The others are the Barbers, the Cutters, the Glovers, and the Whittawyers. After this date the bequests are more often made to Craft Gilds, such as the Grocers, Haberdashers, Taylors, and Skinners, as well as to the Drapers. ' This restriction was probably due to the jealousy of the City, which had no such privilege. Letter Book H, xlix. = Ashley, Econ. History, i. 127. The giving of livery, that is, of a distinctive dress or badge, was a common custom of the time. It was considered dangerous, because power&l men in this way organized their retainers into a semi-military force and often by their assistance not only endangered the peace, but overawed the Law Courts. The Act 7 Henry IV, c. 14, forbad Lords to grant liveries to any but their actual servants and to persons indentured to them for life, and forbad the practice altogether to persons below the rank of banneret. The wearing of a distinctive dress by the Gilds became common in the fourteenth century and hence the term ' Livery Companies ' applied to the Gilds of London. The attempt to include the Gilds in the statute against liveries was probably due to the dislike for their growing power. ^ Stow, ed. Kingsford, ii. 192, doubts whether the Gilds thought it necessary to apply for licences. But certainly we have a pardon granted Dy Richard III to the Drapers for all offences, including the wearing of livery. Cf. Appendix, vol. i. No. XVI. London and her Gilds 4-5" more Crafts, the Taylors, the Skinners, the Mercers, and the Saddlers, obtained Royal Charters (igpo, 1393, 13P4, and igpj-), while the Goldsmiths obtained a renewal of those which had been granted in 1327. Henceforth this becomes the aim of every Craft. It should be observed that most of the Charters Peculiarities thus gained differ in several important respects from the earlier of these new ones. In the earher Charters of the reign of Edward II Charters, and Edward III the Gilds are generally spoken of as Mysteries,' and the main object of the Charters is to grant more or less exclusive privileges of trade. Although there can be little doubt that in most cases the social and religious ' Fraternity ' existed, and that it was by means of the religious sanction, thus gained, that the Gilds were able to enforce the regulations on their members, the earlier Charters do not mention or give legal sanction to the ' Fraternity '. When we pass to the later Charters, although the term ' Mystery ' is still retained and trade privileges are generally though not universally mentioned, it is the religious aspect of the Societies to which prominence is generally given They are empowered to establisn their Gild and ' Fraternity '. The ' Fraternity ' is often connected with the name of the Saviour or of some Saint," and the ' benefit ' or charitable work of the Gild is generally mentioned, even where it is not given as the reason for granting the Charter,^ while the religious aspect is often enforced by imposing the duty of maintaining chaplains. Finally, by the later Charters, the Gilds are for the first time constituted ' in name and fact one perpetual body and one com- munity, with perpetual succession and a common seal ', and it is on the ' Gild ' and ' Fraternity ', not on the Mystery, that the legal personality is conferred. They are given the right to hold property, and to sue and be sued in their common name. In ' The word Mysterie, French mysthe^ is certainly derived from mestera (Italian mestiere), a Trade or Craft, and this from ministtrium, not from mysterium, a secret. = The Drapers were in honour of the Virgin Maty, Mother of the Holy Lamb. The Taylors called themselves the Fraternity of St. John the Baptist. The Fish- mongers adopt St. Peter as their Patron. The Patron of the Goldsmiths was St. Dunstan. The Skinners were in honour of Corpus Christi. Cf. Charters given by Herbert. ^ e. g. Goldsmiths undertake to relieve those who by fire and smoke of quick- silver have lost their sight ; the Mercers to provide a chaplain and relieve those who have suffered from shipwreck. Cf. Herbert, Livery Companies. 4-6 Introduction other words, the Gilds thereby become for the first time a ' persona', a legal collective personality, a perpetual corporate Fraternity recognized by the State. No doubt the corporate spirit had existed long before ; indeed; as Gierke ' has shown, the metaphysical conception of the organic unity of any group of individuals, acting together for some common end, with a common will, existed everywhere in the Middle Ages, and the Charters rather confirm privileges which had been founded on custom, and which had already been granted by the Mayor if not by the King, than create anything new. But whereas before the strength of this corporate spirit lay in the moral sanction of the Church, it now gains the more practical and definite support of the Law. The State steps in and adds its secular sanction.'' By these Charters the Gilds secured a greater independence from the control of the municipal authorities. They no longer enjoyed their privileges by the authority of the Mayor alone, but ' Gierke, Political Theories of the Middle Ages, translated by Maitland, pp. xxvifT. and 98; Maitland, Collected Papers, iiL 210, Corporations Legal and Moral. '^ The following extracts from the Charters of the Drapers will illustrate these differences : The Charter of 38 Edward III. The Charter of 17 Henry VI. The Members of the Mystery of Empowers the men of the Mystery Drapers are granted the monopoly of Drapers ' to erect, found, and estab- of making, buying, selling, cloth and lish their Gild and Fraternity of the drapery in retail, with some exceptions. Blessed Virgin Mary and to hold and They are authorized ' to elect four of enjoy the same and their perpetual their Mystery to rule and govern ' the successors for all times to come '. It said Mystery, who are to be sworn empowers them to elect four Wardens before the Mayor to oversee that no and a Master to support the burthen fault or deceit be used or committed and business of the Fraternity, and to in the said Mystery, and are to punish govern the same ; and constitutes the such as shall offend according to the Master, Wardens, brothers and sisters advice and by the aid of the Mayor of the said Fraternity in deed and and Sheriffs. name one body and pei-petual Commu- nity with perpetual succession and a common seal ; grants them legal power to purchase lands, tenements, rents, &c. in perpetuity, and in their common name to plead and be impleaded. London and her Gilds 47 by that of the Crown, and accordingly it became henceforth the aim of every GUd to secure incorporation. In the reign of Henry VI four of the leading Victualling and five of the most important non-Victualling Gilds attain their end. But in most of these later Charters the industrial aspect, rather than the social or religious, is again more strongly emphasized.' With the accession of Edward IV, and the adoption of a policy of protecting home industries, the number of Charters of Incorpora- tion increases. No less than nine are granted by that King, and one by Richard III. Thus by the end of the Middle Ages twenty-five Gilds had been recognized as Collective Personalities, and shortly after five more were added.'' ' Cf. Unwin, Gilds, pp. i6i, 163. The Charters of the Armourers and Haberdashers are, however, granted to the Fraternities, and there is no reference to the trade regulations. =* The Goldsmiths 1393 The Barbers 14^2 Skinners Ironmongers 1453 Mercers 1394 Pewterers I4($8 Saddlers 1395 Dyers 1471 Taylors 1408 Musicians 1472 Grocers 1428 Parish Clerks 147J Fishmongers 1433 Carpenters 1477 Vintners 1436 Fullers 1480 Brewers 1437 Cooks 1482 Drapers 1438 Wax-chandlers 1484 Cordwainers 1349 Plasterers 1 JOI Leather-sellers 1444 Coopers IJOI Haberdashers 1447 Poulterers 1J04 Armourers I4f3 Bakers 1J09 Tallow-chandlers 1462 Irmholders 1J15 Of these only eleven eventually gained the peculiar privilege of being called a Greater Livery Company. The twelfth was that of the Clothworkers, a union of the Fullers and Shearmen, who were incorporated in i J28. In some cases, as in those of the Skinners, the Goldsmiths, and the Parish Clerks, there is some doubt as to when exactly full incorporation was granted. The Parish Clerks were not clerics. Apparently they were often employed to sing in dirges and at feasts, and to act Miracle Plays. Arundel, City Companies, p. 217. The distinction between the Greater and Lesser Livery Companies may be 48 Introduction The Mayor The municipal authorities were not unnaturally jealous of this insists on his increased independence on the part of the more successful com- authomy. ponies. They had always claimed that the Gilds could only exercise their powers of self-government and issue ordinances by their leave. Even during the factious times of Richard II, the Mayor for the time being had often insisted that the opposing Gilds should submit their Charters to him for confirmation, and in 14.37 the right was recognized by Parliament. On the grounds that many ' Gilds and Fraternities and other companies corporate, by colour of rule and governance and other terms in general words to them granted ... by charters of divers kings, made many unlawful . . . and unreasonable ordinances for their own singular traced as early as the reign of Edward III, and it was hastened by the Act of 13^4 which ordered all artisans to choose and adhere to the Company proper to their own Mystery, but the right of being counted among the Greater was one of prescription only, and fell to those Companies which were composed of traders rather than handicraftsmen, and who therefore represented the capitalists. In I JO J, at the burial of Elizabeth of York, only nine are ordered to stand in Chepe, though others were permitted. Finally, in the seventh year of Henry VIII, a precept of the Mayor which settled the dispute between the Clothworkers and the Dyers fixed the order thus : 1. Mercers j. Goldsmiths 9. Salters 2. Grocers 6. Skinners 10. Ironmongers 3. Drapers 7. Taylors 11. Vintners 4. Fishmongers 8. Haberdashers 12. Shearmen In the reign of Edward VI there were some fifty Lesser Livery Companies in London. The Privileges of these Greater Companies were as follows : 1. They alone had the honour of enrolling the Sovereign among their members. 2. They alone took part in the elections of the Mayor. 3. They took precedence in all civic pageants, sending 'assistants ' to attend on the Mayor. 4. Their Masters and Wardens had the exclusive right of attending the Lord Mayor when he waited on the Chief Butler at the Coronations. J. Until 1742, with only one break in 1649, the Mayor was by custom always a member of one of these Greater Companies. The Privileges were accompanied by certain special burdens : 1. They alone contributed to the repair of the City walls. 2. The loans raised by the Government or the City were chiefly subscribed by them, and, owing to the wealth, their contribution to the subsidies was considerable. Herbert, i. 37, 135 j Arundel, 343 fF. j Letter Book L, xlii. London and her Gilds 49 profit and to the damage of the people, as well as many of such things whereof the cognisance and punishment only pertaineth to the King, lords of franchises and other persons, whereby the King and others be disinherited of their profits ', the Act i j- Henry VI, c. 6, orders all to bring their Charters to be registered and their ordinances confirmed by the Justices of the Peace or the chief Governors of cities, boroughs, and towns.' The City forthwith put the Act into operation, and disputes about the validity of Charters ' are the main staple of city politics at this period '.° In cases where the Charter was proved to be authentic the Mayor did not indeed venture to annul it. Thus the Chartered Companies derived their privileges from the Crown, but exercised them under the sanction of the Mayor, who claimed the right to revise their ordinances. The Mayor issued his pre- cepts on matters of municipal government, and the regulation of trade by his own authority or by that of the Common Council, and, besides that, conveyed, through other precepts, the com- mands of the Crown. The jurisdiction of the Gilds was limited to their authority over their own members. Their functions were inquisitorial rather than judicial, and in the last resort, against a recalcitrant member, or in disputes between rival com- panies, appeal had to be made to the Mayor.^ After all, it was only the richer Gilds who could obtain Charters from the Crown, since the royal favour was not to be gained without the payment of heavy fees, and accordingly, of the 112 GUds existing in 141 1, fifty at least subsequently dis- appeared, or became merged in the larger incorporated Gilds, or became subordinate to them.'' The rest still remained under the exclusive authority of the Mayor, who, as in the days before incorporation, authorized their ordinances and allowed ' Cf. Liber Albns, Riley^s translation, p 4J i ; Letter Book K, xli. = Unwin, Gilds, pp. i6z, 2 j6; Letter Book L, pp. xvi fF. From the beginning of the seventeenth century the licence of the Mayor was necessary before a Charter, whether of incorporation or not, was sued for. ^ Cf. Herbert, Livery Companies, i. J5 ; Unwin, Gilds, p. 231. * See Hazlitt, Gilds, pp. vi, 103 ff. ; Unwin, Gilds, p. 166. Thus the Leather- sellers absorb the Tawyers, Pursers, Glovers, and Pouch-makers ; the Armourers absorb the Bladesmiths and Braziers ; the Blacksmiths absorb the Spurriers ; the Hatters and Cappers fall under the control of the Haberdashers. TO Introduction Relation of the Gilds to the Muni- eipal Autho- rities at the close of the fifteenth century. them to organize themselves with some of the powers enjoyed by their more successful rivals." Thus at the close of the fifteenth century the Gilds fall into two classes. First stood those that had obtained a Royal Charter, among which eleven held the prestige of being counted as among the Greater , Livery Companies. Next came the inferior ones, who, without any Royal Charter, enjoyed less extensive powers of self-government granted them by the municipal authority. Meanwhile, the number of the Parish Fraternities, once so numerous, steadily declined. Some of them had become con- nected with a Craft Gild, and the growing connexion of these Gilds and the Parish Churches tended to the same end. That xheir number cannot have been very great in ij-^-l is shown by the fact that only eighteen were then disendowed. And yet while the Mayor and the Common Council insisted on their supremacy over the Gilds, the Gilds were practically monopolizing the government of the City. It is true that the Alderman of a "Ward was selected by the Mayor and the exist- ing Aldermen out of four candidates elected by the freemen of his Ward," and that the members of the Common Council were ' Those powers were generally confined to the right of electing Masters or Wardens, of ruling the Mystery, and punishing disobedient members. Cf. Goldbeaters, Letter Book I, p. 9 ; Joynours, Letter Book I, p. 13 ; Steynours, Letter Book I, p. 14. For other instances in the reign of Henry IV, cf. Letter Book I, pp. zf, Jo, ^j, 68, 144, 147. Twenty-nine Crafts in all obtained this confirmation from the Mayor. Of these seven got Charters of Incorporation in the fifteenth century ; two in the sixteenth, four in the seventeenth, and sixteen never. Besant, Med. London, ii. 119. Of sixty Crafts who took part in a Mayor's Feast in IJ31, not more than half were incorporated. ^ The change in the position of the Aldermen from hereditary possessors of sokes to that of elected heads of their Wards, appears to have been gradual during the latter part of the thirteenth century, and to have been finally settled in 1377, when it was ordained that they should be elected directly by the Wards for one year, and should not be eligible for two years in succession. So things remained for twenty years, but by the Stat. 17 Richard II, A. D. 13 94, they were to hold office for life, and the right of the Wards was confined to the presentation of two candidates, from whom the Mayor and Aldermen chose one. The Court of Aldermen even claimed the right of rejecting the candidates and ordering a fresh nomination, and also of appointing without such nomination. This, with variations as to the number of candidates to be presented by the Ward, remained the system till 1714, when, by the Statute 13 Anne, the right of free London and her Gilds yi also elected by the Mayor and Aldermen from the "Wards, according to their size. But to be a freeman of a ward it was necessary ' to be a Gildsman who had passed his apprenticeship or had been admitted by redemption. The elections were there- fore really in the hands of members of some Gild or other, while most of the elected Common Council men were, whether Aldermen or no, important members of some Gild and generally members of the greater Gilds. In the elections of the Sheriffs and Mayors the influence of the Gilds was still more direct. The Mayor indeed had the privilege of nominating one Sheriff, ' the King's Sheriff'. But the other, or both, if the Mayor did not exercise his prerogative, was elected by the Common Council, assisted by the Masters and Wardens of the twelve great Livery Companies, who were ' to associate with themselves the honest men of their Mysteries, that is the livery men, coming in their best liveries'.'' The same body elected the Mayor and also the members of Parliament for the City, but in the case of the Mayor the powers of the electoral body were confined to the presenting the names of two persons, who had already served as Aldermen and Sheriffs, from which the Mayor of the past year and the Court of Alder- men selected one. How completely the government of the City was now in the hands of the greater Gilds is shown by the fact election was restored to the Wards. Baddeley, Aldermen of Cripplegate, pp. 1 56 ff. ; Beaven, Aldermen, p. 142. .' Cf. Riley, Liber Albus, p, 140; Charter of Richard II — 'Every person admitted to the freedom of the City shall be of a certain Mystery or Craft, and, if a stranger, shall be admitted by apprenticeship only and not by redemption ' (Letter Book I, p. 63). This remained so till 1835. Since then the freedom of a Gild, though one qualification for the freedom of the City, is no longer necessary. = This custom was not relaxed oil the middle of the sixteenth century. Norton's Commentaries, pp. 12^, 127 ; Ordinances of Common Council, .7 Edward IV and i j Edward IV, as confirmed later by Act of Parliament, 2 George I. By this ordinance the discretionary power of the Mayor to summon whom he would was abolished. By an ordinance of 1402, owing to the tumult caused by apprentices and serving men at elections, it had been enacted that none are to enter the Guildhall except those summoned by the Mayor. No one was to be summoned except they be of the Common Council or ' of the more sufficient men of the City '. Letter Book I, p. 34. 5"! Introduction that most of the Aldermen and Sheriffs, and all the Mayors for many years, were members of one of the Greater Livery Com- panies. Thus by the close of the fifteenth century the Gild organization and that of the City had become amalgamated. The Crafts had triumphed, and the real power lay in the hands of the Greater Livery Companies. The reign of Edward IV also marks the date when the City itself, as many of the Gilds had before, becomes a complete Corporate unity. No doubt it had practically secured this position before, partly by prescription, partly by Charter. It had long possessed a common seal; it had made by-laws; it had held corporate property ; its power of filling up vacancies by election had implied the right of perpetual succession ; it had enjoyed the privilege of suing and being sued in its corporate capacity. The Charter of Edward IV only gave the final sanction when it definitely allowed the City to acquire lands by purchase and in mortmain.' Henceforth the relations between the City and the Greater Livery Companies resembled very closely those between the University of Oxford and the Colleges. Just as at Oxford no person could become a member of the University without being a member of a College, and the Vice-Chancellor was chosen from the Heads of the Colleges, yet the University exercised a general control over the studies of the students (though not over the internal government of the Colleges) and granted the degrees ; so in London every citizen was under a double allegiance : first, as a Gildsman to obey the Masters and Wardens, and to comply with the ordinances of their Gild ; secondly, to obey the Mayor and the other civic authorities and to pay scot and lot. No sooner, however, had the Tudor mounted the throne than the authority of the Mayor in the matter of confirming the ' Stubbs, Constit. Hist.jcd. 1 878, iii. 577; GommCjThe Governance of England, pp. 273, 35' (5; Pollock and Maitland, History of English Law, i. 675; Gierke, Political Theories of Middle Ages, translated by Maitland. The gradual growth of the civic Corporation and the comparatively late date at which it received its final legal incorporation, as compared with many of the Gilds, are curious, but have their parallel in the history of Oxford, where many of the Colleges received formal Charters of Incorporation before the University. Cf Case, The Proposed Statute concerning Finance, Pamphlet, Feb. 10, ijiz, p. 8. London and her Gilds 5-5 ordinances of the Gilds was transferred to the Chancellor, the Lord Treasurer, and the Chief Justices of either Bench.' This measure may be said to sound the passing beU of the system of ' Town economy ' and of the Craft system which was its outcome, and to herald the rise of the new National economy which was henceforth to prevail. "The Government of London at the beginning of the Sixteenth Century" The Freedom of the City could originally be obtained either by Freedom of birth or by redemption,^ that is by paying a fee. At some date, the City, probably in the reign of Henry III or Edward I, the system of apprenticeship in the Gilds was introduced, and thus became a third avenue to citizenship. At the master's death the apprentice con- tinued to serve his widow or executors for the residue of his term, which was never to be less than seven years.* In 1368 it was de- cided that if an apprentice at the end of his term could not pay the fee of doj. for admission to freedom, he should continue to serve as an apprentice or hired servant.' Strangers could only be admitted • 19 Henry VII, c. 7, 1503-4; Unwin, Industrial Organization, p. y6j Busch, England tinder the Tudors, p. 257. ^ For a longer description cf. Clode, Merchant Taylors, Part I, ch. i ; Beaven, Aldermen, vol. ii. Introduction. ^ The keeping of a roll of apprentices and others admitted to the Freedom appears to have been begun in 12,75. Chron. Ed. I, II, Rolls Series, i. 85, 86. The earliest list of those admitted by redemption to any Gild, with occasional notices of those admitted by apprenticeship, is in the third year of Ed. 11(1309). It continued till 1 3 1 2. The fees vary from nothing, in case of royal officials and other exceptional persons, to 100/. Letter Book D, pp. 35 fF. The Mayor also had originally the privilege of making six men free of the City. But this privilege was abolished in 1434 in return for an annual gift of four casks of wine. Some exceptional rights of creating Freemen existed till iSffJ. Letter Book K, XXXV. In the fifteenth century we find complaints that too many are admitted both by redemption and apprenticeship, and attempts were made to stop this abuse by limiting the number to be so admitted, attempts which were not very successful, e. g. No one to put his son or daughter as an apprentice unless he had 20/. a year in land, 9 Henry IV, repealed 8 Henry VI. Letter Book K, XXXV. ■• Letter Book D, ii, vi ; E, p. 1 3, and authorities quoted there. ' Letter Book G, p. 180. 5*4 Introduction in the fourteenth century either by the assent of the ' Commonalty in the Husting ', or presentation by six of his Craft or Mystery, who should stand surety for him. And as the Crafts increased in importance this became the ordinary way of admission. The Charter of Richard II enacted that every person admitted to the freedom of the City should be of a certain Mystery or Craft. The privileges of a freeman included the right to reside within the City walls/ to engage in wholesale trade throughout the realm, and by retail in the goods of the Mystery to which he belonged, to enter any town without payment of toll, to be exempt from the jurisdiction of courts without the City except in certain specified cases. By the Charter of Edward III he was also to be exempted from military service outside the City," though this privilege was not retained. Foreigners. Strangers, whether of English nationality or no, suffered under serious disabilities. They could not deal by retail, nor buy merchandise in the City for re-sale, nor deal with each other in the City .3 The Wards. The Wards, twenty-four in number, were composed of all other than villeins who, besides paying scot and lot or being householders, had to be members of some Gild, and if strangers to be admitted by apprenticeship and not by redemption.'' This continued tiU iSjjf, when all those who enjoyed the Parliamentary franchise were held to be Freemen. Aldermen. • The Aldermen, since the ordinance of 140a, were nominated for life by the Mayor and existing Aldermen out of four eligible candidates elected by the Wards ; the Mayor and existing Alder- men claiming the right to refuse to nominate, and to demand another election, and even to appoint without election. In 171 1 the number to be returned was fixed at two, and by 13 Anne (17 14) direct election was restored to the Wards. To be eligible the candidate must be ' good and discreet ', and have goods to the ' Originally tiiey were obliged to reside continuously, but by an ordinance of i3(Jy this was no longer necessary, if they paid scot and lot. Letter Book G, p. 203. ^ Letter Book D, iii j E, xx, and authorities quoted. ^ Letter Book E, pp. 42, z6x. * Stat, of Richard II j Lib. Albus, 140 ; Letter Book I, p. 63.. London and her Gilds SS value of;^i,ooo (p Ed. IV). By Stat, p Anne (1710) the qualifi- cation was raised to ;^i 5^,000, and to ;^5 0,000 by 5-2 George III (1812). In 183 1 the Mayor and Aldermen refused to admit Michael Scales. A long process ensued which was ended in iSjp by the aiErmation of the House of Lords of the right of the Mayor and Aldermen to reject unsuitable candidates, and after three rejections to nominate themselves. Until the latter half of the sixteenth century the Aldermen were always members of one of the twelve Greater Livery Companies and if not so at the time of election, were transferred to one. After that date they often belonged to the Lesser Com- panies, especially in the eighteenth century.' The Aldermen presided over the moot of their Wards. They tried weights and measures ; regulated the Inns ; superintended the cleansing of highways and watercourses in their Wards ; kept the peace and the gates of the City ; held views of frank-pledge ; saw that the members of their Wards were assessed to arms, stt the watch, and, on the precept of the Mayor, levied the Trained Bands of their Wards, these levies being independent of those raised by the Companies. In the reign of Henry VI they are sometimes, and more often under the Tudors, Justices of the Peace, and, as Justices, fixed wages under the Act of Apprentices. Finally, by the Stat, of 1741 all Aldermen were to be appointed Justices of the Peace. They were obliged to reside in the City, unless they got leave of absence from the Court, and were obliged to serve, unless they could prove that they had not the necessary property qualification or were especially excused.^ The Court of Aldermen was composed of the Mayor and Alder- The Court men of the year. Of this Court there were two sessions. of Alder- I. That of the Inner Chamber, which claimed a right of control ""*"• over the acts of the Common Council and of vetoing measures passed there. This right was forbidden during the Commonwealth, ' Letter Book H, p. 43^ ; I, p. 18 ; Beaven, Aldermen, vol. i, p. 143. ^ The instances of Stephen Fabyan and John Gedney, Drapers. Letter Books I— 157; Baddeley, Aldermen, p. 178; Riley's Memorials, p. ^03. In ijoi Sir Lawrence Aylmer was dismissed because he was in prison for debt. Baddeley, p. 183. In 1J46 John Sadler was allowed to give up his office on account of sickness. Baddeley, p. 190. S6 Introduction The Court of Common Council. Hustings Court. Feb. 1 549. But it was again claimed after the Restoration, and' decided in favour of the Aldermen.' It also had power to punish City officers by fines. II. That of the Outer Chamber, or Lord Mayor's Court. Though nominally presided over by the Lord Mayor and Alder- men, the Recorder acted as Judge. It had cognizance of all mixed actions, and enjoyed peculiar jurisdiction in cases arising out of the customs of London. It controlled the lower tribunals of the City, and punished by fine, deprivation offreedom, or imprisonment. The Court of Common Council consisted of Aldermen, elected as above, and of Commoners. The Commoners were, by the ordi- nance of Richard II (1384), to be elected by the Wards, six, four, or two from each Ward according to their size, so long as not more than eight of any one Mystery should be presented. In 1383 ninety-six were elected.'' The first list we have of a Common Council is in 1437. But it is very imperfect.^ The elections to the Common Council, however, during the fifteenth century were very loosely conducted, and it appears that at times the Alderman of each Ward exercised the right of nominating the members from his Ward. It was not till the end of the sixteenth century that the Wardmoots gained the right of direct election. The elections even then were very irregularly conducted. The numbers of the Common Council varied very much. There were 187 in Edward VI's reign, ao8 in ij^pS. Finally, the Act of 1840 fixed the numbers at 206^.'* The Common Council supervised the general administration of the City, authorized the issue of ordinances by the Mayor (its legislative powers were confirmed by ly Edward III), looked after the public health and education, and managed the estates of the Corporation.' The Hustings Court was the County Court of London. It was presided over by the Mayor and Sheriffs.* ' Loftie, London, ii. 304, 448. ^ Riley, Lib. Albus, p. 398 ; Letter Book H, p. 173. ^ Riley, Memorials, p. liii. '* Baddeley, Aldermen of Cripplegate, pp. 209 fF. ; Letter Book, p. 23 j. ' Ibid., p. 210. * C£ Sharpe, Calendar of Wills, i-ii. London and her Gilds si 1 . It heard pleas of land and ' Common Pleas, and appeals on a writ of error were returnable to the Justices sitting at the Court of St. Martin's le Grand.' 2. Judgement of outlawry was also pronounced in this Court.'' 3 . Deeds and wills were proved and enrolled there. Members of Parliament were also elected there.' There were originally two Chamberlains : The Cham- I. The King's Chamberlain, who was the King's Butler, beilain. and also the City Coroner. a. The City's Chamberlain. After 131P the King's Butler and City Coroner dropped the title of Chamberlain, and there is only one Chamberlain of the City or Guildhall, who is chosen by the Mayor and the Commonalty of the City, as well as the Town Clerk and the Common Serjeants. The Coroner continued to be nominated by the King, till Edward IV granted to the Commonalty the privilege of electing their own Coroner in return for a sum of ^{7,000. The duties of the Chamberlain were chiefly financial, to look after municipal revenues and expenditure. He also admitted persons to the freedom of the City. The Sheriffs, two in number, are, says Stow, ' the Mayor's eyes. The Sheriffs, seeing and supporting part of the care which the person of the Mayor is not alone sufficient to bear '.** One was nominated by the Mayor, the other elected by the Common Council, assisted by the Masters and Wardens of the Livery Companies and honest men of their Mysteries.' In their Courts they had cognizance of civil pleas with appeal to the Hustings Court, and were Sheriffs of Middlesex as well as of the City. They exercised police authority in the City ; held the prelimi- nary inquest of recognition with a jury from the Ward in which the offence had been committed, and, if the offender were not acquitted, presented him for final trial to the Justices sitting ' Cf. Pulling, Laws and Customs of London, p. 173. "^ Pollock and Maitland, i. y 54 5 Bateson, Borough Custom, pp. 7»j 73. 3 Letter Book I, p. J7 note. * Strype's Stow, ed. 1755, V, c. v. ' Letter Book I, pp. 33, J9, 1603-1 I yS Introduction in the Tower. They arrested offenders and committed them to Newgate to await the next gaol delivery.' The Re- The Recorder, who must be a lawyer, acted as Assistant to the colder. Mayor, presided over the Mayor's Court, and delivered its sentences. The Mayor. The Mayor = was elected ^ annually by the Mayor of the past year and the Aldermen from two persons, who had already served as Alderman and Sheriff,'' presented by the Common Council and the Masters and Wardens of the Greater Livery Companies assisted by men of the Livery of their several companies.^ By custom the Mayor was always a member of one of the twelve Greater Livery Companies, and if he were not, he was translated to one. Thus in 1616 C. Hackett, a Dyer, in i55p Sir S. Star- ling, a Brewer, in i6^s Sir J. Sheldon, a Tallow Chandler, in i(57p Sir R. Clayton, a Scrivener, were translated to the Drapers. In i(S4P Andrews, a Leatherseller, was Mayor, but these were revolutionary times. When in I74X R. Wilmott, a Cooper, was elected, counsel gave opinion that the custom of translation had no legal authority, and since then it has been no longer necessarily observed. The title ' Lord Mayor ' is said to date from the Charter of Edward III. But it rests on no official creation, and may be a mistranslation of ' dominus ', which often meant no more than ' Sir '. In 1440 we find a mention of ' Domine Mayor ' without any name. The earliest instance of the use of the title Lord Mayor is by John Shaw in 15-02.^ The Mayor claimed the right to assist the Chief Butler at coronations.' The first instance of his acting in this capacity was ' Letter Book B, vii j D, iv ; Riley, Lib. Albus, p. 42. ° For a list of the Mayors to 1 5'48, cf. Letter Book F, p. 27^. It should be compared with the list in Lib. de Antiq. Leg., ii, pt. I , p. 2 3 9, and that in Gregory's Chronicle, Camden Society. ^ The date of election was altered a good many times, but was finally fixed in If 4^ for Michaelmas Day, Sept. 29. * The rule that the Mayor must be an Alderman dates from 143 j, and that he must have previously served as Sheriff from 1385;. In 167% the Common Council decided that not more than one member of any Craft should be presented. ^ Riley, Lib. Albus, p. 19 ; Letter Book I, 34 ; K, 243, 361. * Letter Book G, xxiv. The first use of the title in the Drapers' Books is in IJ21. C£ Rep. 7. 170. It did not become common till somewhat later. Beaven, Aldermen, ii, p. xxviii. ' Letter Book K, xii, note, and p. 104. London and her Gilds S9 at the coronation of King John,' and since the year 1444 he was a Justice of the Peace for the City. The office of Mayor, hke all the unpaid ones, had to be accepted, and refusal to do so entailed a fine. But by an ordinance of 143^ no one was to be called to the office more than twice. By an ordinance of the reign of Edward I no Mayor, Sheriff, or Alderman or other City officer was allowed to brew or keep oven or wine tavern, or to carry on any trade to which a low estimate was attached,'' or to be a victualler or sell such victuals by retail during his time of office.3 The Mayor's Court was presided over by the Recorder. But the Lord Mayor and Aldermen and Sheriffs might sit as Judges with him. The Court tried all manner of actions. In spite of fluctuations the authority of the Mayor grew from Powers of the fourteenth century onwards until the reign of James I, when the Mayor the Mayor claimed to be the Master of all the Companies. °^^'' ^^^. I. He and the Common Council had extensive authority ™P*n*^*- over the regulation of trade and over matters of civic administration. 1. In cases of disputes between the rival companies the final appeal lay with him. 3. He claimed the right to revise their ordinances until the Act ip Hen. VIII, c. 7 (15-03), which transformed this right to the Chancellor, the Treasurer, and the Chief Justices of either Branch. Even then his licence had to be obtained before a Royal Charter could be sued for. 4. Recalcitrant members were in the last resort handed over to him for imprisonment in the Counter and other City prisons. S- His regulations and orders were enforced by precepts, which were of two kinds : (r) Precepts issued on his own authority for civic purposes, (a) Precepts issued by order of the Crown. These became more common in Tudor times, when the Mayor became the agent of the royal autocracy and dealt especially with the demands for loans and for military levies, and provided work for the poor. ' Sharpe, London, i. 69. "" Letter Book K, p. 237. ^ Ordinance of 1399, Liber Cust., fo. cciv ; Liber Albus, i. 272. CHAPTER I THE EARLY HISTORY OF THE CLOTH TRADE UP TO THE END OF THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY. THE FIRST APPEARANCE OF THE DRAPER. Trade. S for your original,' says Elkanah Early im- Settle in the Preface to his portance of Pageant for Sir Thomas Stamp, ^^^ ^°°^ a Draper, who was Lord Mayor in i5pi, 'drapery is unquestion- ably so ancient as to have the honour of being the immediate successor of the fig leaves. And though we are not quite certain that our great first iather began it within his fair Eden, yet we are assured that Eve's spinstrey and Adam's spade set to work together.' " Although the Leathersellers or Skinners might dispute this claim, since our first parents used skins to hide their nakedness before Eve had learnt to spin, and the Drapers were, as we shall see, a somewhat late development, at least in England, there is no doubt that the spinning and weaving of wool were two of the most primitive industries. In ' The initial comes from Charter No. VI. " Elkanah Settle, Triumphs of London, 1^91. Many other Gilds claim a scriptural origin. Thus the Founders claim to descend from Tubal-cain, the first artificer in brass and iron ; the Weavers from Naamah his sister ; while the Taylors or Linen Armourers declare that their original founders drove Pride and the Devil himself from Birchin Lane with their needles. Hazlitt, Livery Com- panies, pp. 2^3, 660. 6x Early History of the Cloth Trade England, as in Western Europe, they were of equal importance. With that of baking' the weaving industry was one of the earliest to take the form of the Gild. It also was one of the earliest to break through its limits and supplies ' the most striking and detailed example of the influence of economic development on the mutual relations of handicraft organizations '.^ The From the Great Roll of the Exchequer of 1130 we learn that Weavers. there existed Gilds of Weavers in Lincoln and London as early as the reign of Henry I. They made an annual payment in return for royal recognition, and there are evidences of their existence in the twelfth century at Winchester, at Marlborough, at York, and at Oxford.^ In the reign of Henry II the Cloth-finishers'' were among the adulterine Gilds, which were condemned because they had re- ceived no royal authorization. In the same reign, however, the Weavers of London' received their first Charter, in which they were confirmed in the liberties which they had enjoyed under Henry I. They were granted a Court of their own, and no one was allowed to engage in their handicraft in the City, Southwark, or other suburbs, unless they belonged to their Gild. These privi- leges were, however, much disliked, partly we may guess by those who pursued weaving as a by-industry in their homes, ' The Bakers' Gild is mentioned in the Great Roll of the Exchequer, 1 1 J J ; Madox, Exchequer, Z3 i. Their first Charter is of the date of Edward II. ^ Ashley, Econ. History, Book II, c. iii, p. 191 ; Unwin, Industrial Organiza- tion, p. 26. ' A. D. 1 180. Liber Custum.j Ixi. 131, 131; Pipe Roll Society Publications, 1 1 Hen. II, &c. * Gilda PararioiTim. This may mean Shearmen. Cf. Liber Cust., Rolls Series, pp. 33, 418 If. Henry II also granted a Charter to the Weavers of York, 1154. This is the earliest Charter to a Craft Gild that is known. In i i7f the Cord* wainers of Oxford obtained one. Ballard, British Borough Charters, p. io8. ' From a notice in Letter Book K, fos. 119, 119b of the date of 1432 (or there- abouts), we learn that there ' had always been ' three distinct Mysteries of native clothworkers, viz. native weavers of woollen cloth for tapestry, native weavers of woollen cloth for drapery, native weavers of woollen cloth for napeiy, and that of these three only the second had always had a Gild of their own. We find, however, notices of the Tapicers as having a Mystery by the licence of the Mayor in the fourteenth century. Letter Book E, fo. 210; G, fo. i68b. Stow speaks of weavers of draperie or taperie and naperie existing in the time of Edward III. Ed. Kingsford, i. 218. to Close of the Thirteenth Century 6^ partly by other Crafts interested in the cloth trade, especially as these Weavers were originally many of them foreigners. So un- popular were they that the Londoners paid sixty marks to King John on condition that he would abolish the Gild.' John, how- ever, soon after reinstated it. The Charter was renewed by Edward I, and in the reign of Edward II the privileges were con- firmed, although the Weavers were condemned for exceeding the terms of their Charter in some respects, more especially in their treatment of the Burellers. The position of the Weavers from the twelfth to the fourteenth century is a perplexing one. On the one hand, the feet that they were one of the earliest to obtain a Charter and that their ' ferm ' of ;^i 2, was double that of the Bakers would lead one to beheve that they were men of some influence and wealth ; on the other hand, the language of the Charter of Henry II, which forbade any one to do them injury, or treat them with contumely, as they were certainly treated in other towns, seems to support the view that the industry was con- sidered a very humble one, and that they were at once disliked and despised. The probable explanation of this apparent contradiction is that the original Craft was composed of foreigners.'' The cloth trade was, however, as yet in its infancy. England was an agricultural country ; wool, the raw material, not cloth, was her chief export.^ The better kinds of cloth came to her from abroad, more especially from the Low Countries, which looked to England for her wool, then considered of superior excellence, and where the manufecture of cloth was an established industry as early as the eleventh century.'' If England provided ^ Madox, Exchequer. ' Gives Londoniae debent LX marcas pro Gilda Telaria delenda.' Liber Cust., p. 3 3 . ^ Liber Cust., Ixv. 416— Z4. For position of Weavers in York and Beverley, cf. Leach, Selden Soc, vol. xiv, pp. xliv, 134; Engl. Hist. Review, xvi. f6j ; Victoria County Hist., Yorks. ^ The value of wool exported in one year, 1173, was about ;f 1,000,000. Die WoUaus&hrEnglands; Vierteljahr-Schrift f. Soc- und Wirthschaftsgeschichte, vi. 176—85 cf. Cunningham, i9lo,i. 6zS. Some 100 monasteries were sending wool to Flanders in 1184. Cf. also Patent Rolls, ii73j P- i3j which tells us of foreign merchants from Paris, Arras, Amiens, Bee, Rouen, St. Omer, Brabant, Brussels, Louvain, Lubeck, Cologne, Florence, Lucca, Placentia, and Spain, who are ex- porting wool. * Cf Pirenne, 'Draps de Frise, draps de Flandre,' Siffer, Gand, 1909. Condition of the cloth industry in the later thirteenth century. 64. Early History of the Cloth Trade herself with the commonest kinds, much of this was still woven at home by men, or women, not yet organized in any Gild, who worked directly for the consumer or for the owner of the wool or yarn. In any case the market was a restricted one, and there was little room for the trader or the middleman. Thus the Assize of 1275 forbade any cloth to be woven for sale except within the franchise of the City.' When, however, we reach the later decades of the thirteenth century the industry has gained a wider sphere. Specialization has increased ; a greater variety of cloth is made,' and we hear of various Crafts concerned in its production, such as the Dyers, the Fullers, the Shearmen, the Burellers, and the Drapers. The importance of the rising industry had been realized as early as 125^8. The Barons, who under the lead of Simon de Montfort were then endeavouring to restrain the bad government of Henry III, had in the ' Mad Parliament ' prohibited the export of wool, and were apparently supported in their policy by Fitz Thomas and the party who were interested in organizing the Crafts.3 Englishmen were also enjoined not to seek over-precious raiment, but to clothe themselves in homely cloth of English make/ Edward I, too, intermittently adopted a policy of protec- Ashley, Economic Hist. Florence also was famous for its cloth industry. Cf. Doren, Studien aus der Florentiner Wirtschaftsgeschichte, Bd. i. ' Letter Book A, iiy. ' e. g. Cloth of Candlewick Street, Borel, Bissets, Black cloth. Rayed cloths, Hawes, Says, Kerseys, Poreies, Memist, Wadmell, &c. Cf. Liber Cust. 549 and Glossary} Letter Book E, J3 ; Herbert, Livery Companies, i. 3 95. Bluettos, Blankettos which came from Marlborough. Close Rolls, I2i8,p. 8i. Blanchette of Stamford and Northampton, Blues, Pers Cloth and Burnette of Beverley, Pannivirides, Scarlette of Beverley and York, and Tela Missete of Lincoln, Tela Missete of Leicester, Cloth of Canterbury. Close Rolls, 123J, p. 73 j 1136, pp. 301, 37J, 517; 1237, p. 422; Poulson, 'Bevelac', p. 58; Close Rolls, A.D. 1236, p. 301 ; 1319, p. 1^4; Victoria County Hist., ii. 2. Some other cloths are given in Close Rolls, 1237, p. J27, and in the Wardrobe Accounts of the reign of Edward I ; but whether they were home-made is uncertain. ^ C£ Introduction, vol. i, p. 9. Even before that, Henry III had in 1244 prohibited the export of wool. But this was ' in odium Francorum et Ordinis Cysterciensis (Cistercians) ', Annales de Dunstable, Annales Mon., Rolls Series, iii. 1^3. '' Close Rolls, Ed. I, 1274, pp. 70, 74. Patent Rolls, Ed. I, 1273, p. 13 ; 1274, pp. 50, 71- to Close of the Thirteenth Century 65- tion, although he was influenced rather by political and financial than economical reasons. When his relations with the Countess of Flanders were strained, he forbade any one, under peril of life and limb and loss of all his goods, to take any wool out of the realm, until it be otherwise ordained. But the customs on the export of wool were too valuable to be lost and licences to export were continually granted." Again, in 1325, when Edward II was under the guidance of Hugh le Despenser, a policy of protection was resorted to. The staple was withdrawn from Bruges to towns in England, Ireland, and Wales, and the export of teazles, fuller's earth, madder, woad, butter, and other things necessary for making cloth was forbidden ; '^ while at the very close of the reign all ' commons ' who resided outside cities were to use home- made cloth, always excepting the Royal family, nobles, prelates, or those who had lands to the annual value of 40X The policy of prohibition, however, had not been consistently Policy of maintained ; exceptions were frequently made, and it had but little Edward, effect. Edward III added to these measures of prohibition the more fruitful method of encouraging foreign, and especially Flemish, Weavers to transfer their industry to England. In 1330 the King issued a letter of protection to John Kemp, a Flemish Weaver, ' coming to England to exercise his art and to teach it to such of our people as shall be inclined to learn ', and to all others of his occupation, as also to Dyers and Fullers.^ In \\is the Parliament at York allowed strangers as well as denizens to traffic freely in all cities, though Edward III specially exempted London by Letters Patent of i^n-* This policy reached its climax in the Act of 1 3 3 7,^ which forbade, on pain of ' Ashley, Econ. Hist., II. iii. 194, quoting Walter de Hemingburgh. == Riley, Memorials, 150; Close Rolls, 1316, p. jfif ; Patent Rolls, 1327, p. 98. 5 Rymer, Foedera, II. iv. 495. Cf. also Patent Rolls, 1343, p. iij ; 1335, p. 341 ; 1337, pp. 431, Joo, where protection is given to certain Weavers of Brabant, to a burgher of Ghent ' makuig woollen cloth ', to ' workers of wools and cloths from Seland, and to certain Dyers and Fullers who have lately come into the realm '. ■♦ The Statute was confirmed in 13 Jo, and again by the Statute of Cloths, 13 J I, notwithstanding any Charter to the contrary. Cf. Statutes at Large, Letter Book F, fb. f b ; note, pp. 14, 229. 5 Stat. II Ed. Ill, cc. 1-3, 5. leos'i K 66 Early History of the Cloth Trade heavy punishment, the export of wool and the importation of foreign cloth or the wearing of it, except by the members of the Royal family, and at the same time promised security to foreign cloth workers and ' franchises as many as may suffice them to the intent that they shall the greater will to come'. Finally, in TlSl Edward removed the staple from abroad to certain towns in England, Wales, and Ireland." Edward III also promised protection to all foreign clothworkers and released them from the old restrictions hitherto enforced by the Aulnager as to the length of cloth to be made." The disturbed ' The Staple Towns. The system of naming staple towns where English exports, chiefly wool, woolfells, leather and tin, could alone be sold was primarily established to facilitate the levying of the customs, no articles being allowed to be sold until such customs had been paid and they had been sealed with the ' cocket '. Sometimes the staple towns were confined to England, at others foreign cities were granted the privilege, and the constant shifting of the staple was chiefly due to diplomatic reasons. The system dates definitely from the reign of Edward I, when Antwerp was for a time fixed as the staple town. In the reign of Edward II Bruges was at first made the foreign staple town, but in 1327 the King, then under the influence of Hugh le Despenser, confined it to certain towns in England, Wales, and Ireland. Edward III frequently shifted the foreign staple according to the exigencies of the political situation, and in 1328 temporarily granted to all merchants freedom to purchase with or without the staple in return for a loan for the Scottish war. But in the year 13J3 (27 Ed. Ill) the staple was again removed from abroad. In 1360 Calais, then just ceded to Edward III, was made the foreign staple town, but in 1 3 69 the Stat. 43 Ed. Ill, c. I, confined the staple to the following towns : — In England : Boston, Bristol, Chichester, Exeter, Hull, Newcastle, Queenborough, Westminster, Winchester, Yarmouth. In Wales : Carmarthen. In Ireland : Cork, Drogheda, Dublin, Waterford. All transactions at these markets were placed under the jurisdiction of a Mayor and Constable of the Staple, who judged according to the Law Merchant with natives and aliens as assessors, and every inducement was offered to aliens to frequent them. The wisdom of establishing these staple towns in England was doubtful. It was apparently hoped that thereby the market would be improved, but the free flow of trade was hampered, while the English merchant was jealous of the foreigner who visited the staple towns. Partly owing to this jealousy Calais was again made the foreign staple town by Richard II, and remained so without excitmg much opposition till it was lost by England in ijj8. C£ Cunningham, EngUsh Industry, Early and Middle Ages, Jth edition, pp. 311, 31^; Riley, Calendar of Letters, vi ; Close Rolls, 1320, p. 234; 1328, p. 2fi; 1332, p. 52y; 1333, p. 13; Patent Rolls, 1313, p. ij; 132^, pp. 269-74; Stat. Staple 27 Ed. Ill; 36 Ed. Ill, c. 7. ^ The Aulnager visited the fairs, enforced the measures of cloth which had been fixed by the Assize of Cloth, and levied the aulnage or duty. See Magna to Close of the Thirteenth Century 6y condition of the Netherlands, and more especially of Flanders, where the burghers were fighting against their Count Louis, who was supported by Philip, King of France, led many to respond to the tempting offers,' and Edward III, who was then negotiating an alliance with James van Arteveldt, the famous burgher of Ghent, justified his policy on the ground that the refugees had been driven from their homes by their Count owing ' to their adhesion to our cause '. His aggrieved subjects, the English clothworkers, how- ever, thought otherwise. They declared that they were for the most part malefectors exiled for their misdeeds." The treatment of the foreigners was so bad that a royal proclamation had to be issued threatening dire penalties against those who dared assault them.3 Meanwhile, the Weavers' Gild, which had by this time forgotten its foreign origin, protested. It demanded that it should at least have jurisdiction over the foreign Weavers, or be freed from the ' ferm ' it owed the King.* The quarrel was for the present ended by the formation of an association of ' Weavers alien '. In 1380 we find this association agreeing to pay its pro- portion of the ' ferm ' and joining with the ' Free (or English) Weavers ' in an annual scrutiny of looms belonging to either party.s Carta, c. ij; z Ed. Ill, c. 14 (1318). Perot le Tailleur in the reign of Edward I is the first Aulnager mentioned. Ashley, Econ. Hist., I. iii. 180. Cf. Record Office, 48. 9 Ed. Ill, Bundle 340, no. iiff. For the future history of the aulnage see p. 116, note, of this volume. ' Cf. W. Cunningham, Alien Immigrants to England, p. 100. ' Letter Book H, fo. 89 j Ashley, Econ. Hist., II. iii. 197- ^ Letter Book F, fo. 92. * Madox, Firma Burgi, 284, n. col. 2. Quoted, Ashley, II. iii. 24^ ; Rymer, Foedera, iii. 23. ^ Letter Book H, fo. 124. Of these 'Weavers alien' the most important were the Flemings and those of Brabant. Both of these were allowed to elect •bailiffs' to supervise their Mystery (cf. Letter Book G, fos. 137, 173 b, 187; Riley, Memorials, pp. 306, 331). The relations of the Brabanters and the Flemings were not always very friendly. In 1370 the Flemish Weavers petitioned the Mayor that they, and the Weavers of Brabant, might hold their meeting for hiring servants apart, the one in the Churchyard of St. Laurence Pountney, and the other in that of St. Mary Somerset as heretofore ; although they wish that their serving men shall serve under the Weavers of either nation (Letter Book G, fo. 2^4 ; Riley, Memorials, 345, 346). As late as 1428 we find mentioil of a Mystery of foreign woollen Weavers which had its Masters, and in 1433 6S Early History of the Cloth Trade Motives of this Policy diplomatic rather than economical. It Is no doubt a mistake to attribute this policy of Edward solely to a fer-seeing desire to promote the cloth industry in England and thus to make her a manufacturing country. That the King and his counsellors had, like others before them, some vague ideas of the kind may be true, but a careful attention to chronology will show that the actual measures taken at the moment were really caused by the exigencies of diplomacy, and by dilEculties with his Parliament arising out of the war with France. In the year 1336", just before the outbreak of war, Edward was eager to obtain the alliance of Louis of Nevers, Count of Flanders, and of John, Duke of Brabant. Louis of Flanders, however, had of late been supported by the King of France against his sub- jects, and therefore not only rejected Edward's advances, but prohibited commercial intercourse with England and seized the English merchants in his country. Edward at once procured the famous Act of February 1337, which forbade the export of wool, ordered all, except the King, the Queen, and the Royal children, to wear home-made cloth, and encouraged foreign clothworkers. That the chief motive for this measure was retaliation is proved by the saving clause that it should stand ' till by the King and his Council it be otherwise provided ',' and by the fact that at that very moment Edward was offering privileges to the Duke of Brabant, the enemy and commercial rival of the Count of Flanders, and granting fevours to his subjects.'' When, in July 1338, a royal writ is addressed to the Mayor ordering him to allow foreign ' cloth- workers ' to exercise their trade without belongmg to the (English) Weavers' Gild (Letter Book K, fos. 66, 119, 119 b, 127). Meanwhile the foreign Weavers evaded the payment of their share of the ' ferm ', as we see from petitions of the English Weavers of 1406 and 1414. In the reign of Edward IV 'foreigners ', whether members of the Gild or not, were compelled to contribute, and at some later date, before the reign of Anne, the native Weavers regained control over the foreigners. Ashley, Econ. Hist., II. iii. 102. ' Licences were granted to persons to export to other places besides Flanders, e. g. to John Molas of Aragon to export wool to other places than Flanders. Close Rolls, 1338, p. 318. ^ In February i 337, Edward Illjin answer to the Duke's request,had established the staple at Brussels, Louvain and Mechlin, which were in Brabant. Rymer, Foedera, ii. i)%<). In March and August 1338, the cloth of certain merchants of Brabant, which had been seized under the Statute of 1337, is restored to them. to Close of the Thirteenth Century 69 Edward was granted the right of pre-emption of 20,000 sacks of wool in England, he forthwith had them exported to Antwerp in Brabant, which was made the staple town. The Duke was thus prevailed upon to ally himself with England. Meanwhile, Edward turned to the Flemish rebels, offering to renew their privileges of sending their cloth to England, and to make Bruges once more a staple town. In January 1340 a treaty on these terms was made with Arteveldt, and Count Louis fled to the protection of the French King. In the same year Edward, having received a grant of customs on the export of English wool, hides and woolfells, and wishing to conciliate the powerful wool industry at home, allowed the export of wool on the condition that silver, of which moreover he was in some need, should be imported in return, the same ' to be taken to the King's exchange and there to receive his money ', which was then much debased.' Finally, in 134.1, a further subsidy in the form of wool having been granted to the King, it was ordered that no merchant should export wool till the Michaelmas next ensuing, to the intent that ' the King may be served of that to him granted '.' It would thus appear that the royal policy cannot be adequately explained on any definite economic principle. The protection of the cloth industry was partial, and it was not consistently main- tained. At one time the export of the raw material was for- bidden ; at another it was encouraged, or made use of for the financial needs of the Crown, and, above all, the royal policy was altered in the interests of diplomacy. Nevertheless we may well believe that even this partial pro- tection, and more especially the introduction through foreign craftsmen of more skilled workmanship, had its effect. Of this at least we may be certain : it is from the reign of Edward III that we can trace a remarkable development in the manufacture In March certain merchants of Brabant are allowed to export wool. In 1340 merchants of Brabant are allowed to sell foreign cloth in England ' in considera- tion of their good deeds to the King'. Close Rolls, 1538, pp. 318, 339, 353; 1340, p. 393. In 1338 Edward granted trading privileges in England to the burgesses of Dort, Brussels, Mechlm, and Louvain. Rymer, Foedera, ii. 1058. C£ also the Treaty of 1339, Voisin, p. 19. ' J4 Ed. Ill, Stat. I, c. n. = ij Ed. Ill, c. j. Competition among the Crafts for the trading monopoly. 70 Early History of the Cloth Trade and in the export trade of cloth.' Hence a growing connexion with the Continent and a widening of the market which at once gave new importance to the function of the trader. There were several classes of men concerned in the wool trade, any one of which might have availed themselves of this oppor- tunity of earning the profits which have always fellen to the dealer : those who dealt in wool, those who spun the yarn, and those who made or finished the cloth. In the earlier days, when the chief trade was in the export of wool, the dealers in wool had no doubt the chief monopoly, but, although in the later fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries men, like the famous Jack of Newbury or John Winchcombe the clothier, united in their own persons the functions of the grower and buyer of wool with those of the great modern entrepreneur who employs the artisans to make up the raw material and exposes it for sale, at the period with which we are now dealing, when the industry was for the most part confined to the towns, it was among those who made up the wool that the competition arose." There are some indications that the Dyers, the Fullers, and the Weavers did attempt to become the employers of others and to sell the finished article. In 1 3 jy, as we shall see directly, the Weavers were allowed to sell cloths which they had made themselves to London merchants,^ but a regulation of 1362 forbade Weavers and Dyers ' to be so daring as to prepare any manner of cloth on pain of forfeiture of the cloths so made '.'* In the Charter granted ^ The increase in the export of cloth is shown by the fact that it was thought worth while to impose new customs on such export. According to one authority the exports of cloth in 1354 amounted to 4,774^ pieces of cloth, and 8,o5ii pieces of worsted stuff. The finest kinds of cloth were, however, still imported. Ashley, Econ. Hist. i. 204. The question how far this improvement in cloth-making, so far as Yorkshire is concerned, was due to Edward's measures is discussed in the Victoria County History, Yorks., iii. 43 8 fF. C£ also Heaton, The Cloth Trade in Yorkshire, to be published shortly. ^ Unwin, Industrial Organization, p. 3 o fF., shows that the same struggle was going on abroad, especially in Paris and Strassburg. Cf. also Vierteljahrschrift fur Social- und Wirthschaftsgeschichte, ii. 64, 65, for the same struggle in the Low Countries ; and Doren, Florentiner WoUentuch-Industrie, for Florence. ^ Liber Cust., Rolls Series, II, i. 130, 423. ■* Riley, Memorials, p. 309. to Close of the Thirteenth Century 71 to the Drapers in 1 364., Weavers, Dyers, and Fullers were allowed to sell to Drapers and to Lords and Commoners for their own use in gross, and we shall see that at a later date these craftsmen made some further attempts to retain the right to trade. But their proper flmction was to weave, full, and dye the wool entrusted to them by others,' and they never seriously competed for the trading business. Of the Dyers or the Fullers attempting to do so we have no other instance, and if the Weavers did do a little selhng in 1335-, it was apparently confined to such cloths as they wove themselves, and did not include any which they had put out to be woven by others. Nor were they allowed to finish the cloth by fulling, or dyeing, or shearing. The offences of which they are charged in 1 3 3 J-, and to which we shall return, are the offences of those who work for others rather than those of employers, and, as the process of speciahzation advanced, they dropped back into the position of Weavers only, and were engaged in constant quarrels with the newly imported foreign Weavers.'' Although in 1318 they formed a religious Fraternity, their Gild had then sunk to the ninth place among the Mysteries. It was perpetually in arrears with its payments to the King, and at the close of the fifteenth century it is evidently composed of poor artificers.^ It has been generally assumed that the first London Craft to The establish an important cloth industry in London was that of BuieHers. the Burellers, and that they were the predecessors of the Drapers. Herbert derived the word Bureller from the old rule that the width of cloth should be two ells, such pieces being termed Burells.* Mr. Unwin suggested that Bureller is another name for ' Burler ', one who ' burls ' or picks the burrs or burls from the surfece of the cloth.^ It seems to me far more probable, as Mr. Sharpe thinks, that the Burellers were so called from Borel, a coarse kind of cloth, which was originally made in Normandy, and which with some certainty can be identified with cloth of ' Liber Cnst., pp. 130, 423. = Unwin, Gilds and Companies of London, p. 139. 3 Ashley, Econ. Hist., II. iu. 101. * Herbert, Livery Companies, i. (J45:. 5 Unwin, Industrial Organization, p. 28. On personal reference to him, Mr. Unwin has withdrawn this explanation and says that he now agrees writh me. In the later thirteenth century the Fullers did this burling. Letter Book L, p. 26 1, note to fo. 26$ b. 71 Early History of the Cloth Trade Candelwick Street.' We hear of London Borel as early as iai8, when it was specially exempted from the Assize of Cloth which had fixed the lengths of certain kinds of cloth,'' but the first notice of a Bureller that T have come across is of the year 1277, when we hear of Alfred Le Bureller.' Two years later we meet with a Bureller of Candelwick Street," and another in 1280,5 while in i28p another Bureller, Fulk de St. Edmund, was a Sheriff of London.* In the early fourteenth century the notices of the Burellers are frequent,' and three documents of the dates of 1300, 1 320, and 1335- seem to be conclusive as to their fiinctions at that date. In 1300^ seven Burellers, seven Weavers, and four Alder- men were appointed to draw up ordinances defining the relations of the two Crafts of Burellers and Weavers. In 1320 the Weavers presented the following claims before a Jury : that if any one made ' pannos de Candelwyke Street ' he ought to be supervised by the Weavers' Gild and that no one should make such a 'pannum ' in less than one day; that all yarn used should be inspected ; that if members of their own Gild brought bad yarn they should be punished by the Craft, but if it w^ere brought by a Bureller he should be fined by the Mayor on their information. The Jury, while supporting the claim of the Weavers to view the yarn brought to them by Burellers, as well as their general demand that no one should interfere with their Mystery in London or in the suburbs, condemned their policy of calling ' canny ' and of limiting the number of their members and their looms, measures which were maliciously adopted for the purpose of enhancing the price.' ' Letter Book A, p. 37, note to fo. 19. 'Pannos de Candelwickestrete.' Liber Cust., Rolls Series, IL ii. 417. It was also made at Marlborough. Close Rolls, 1107, p. 82 ; Patent Rolls, 1218, p. 164. In 1280 a Bureller is also called a chaloner, or maker of coverlets and blankets. He also buys yarn. Letter Book A, fos. 1 9, J I . ^ Patent Rolls, 1 2 1 8, pp. ifj, lyj; ibid., 122J, p. ^23. ' Letter Book A, fo. 135 b. ■* Calendar of Wills, i. 39. ^ Letter Book A, fo. 19. * Ibid., fo. 102. ' Letter Book D, fos. 41 b,4?, 84 b ; E, fos. 9, 24 b, p. 172, note to fo. 139b, fos. 236, 260, 29^. Calendar of Wills, i. 424, 458. * Liber Cust., Rolls Series, II. i. 121. ' In 13 3 J the Weavers, on the indictment of the Wards of Candelwick Street to Cbse of the Thirteenth Century 73 The matter, however, did not end there. In ins the Weavers accused the Burellers of interfering with their Craft by weaving without becoming members of their Gild. The question having been brought before the Mayor and the SheritFs, the Burellers answered that though they were not Weavers they were at liberty, as freemen of the City, to engage in any trade or Mystery, and further that they had servants who were apprentices and members of the Weavers' Gild. At the second hearing of the case the Weavers did not appear, and were declared to be 'in mercy ' for a false claim, while the demand of the Burellers, and indeed of all freemen, to have looms was confirmed." From these documents it appears that the Burellers made some at least of the yarn for the cloth of Candelwick Street ; that they sometimes wove it or had it woven at home, sometimes sent it to the Weavers to be woven, and then they, rather than the Weavers, were the employers."" In 13 3 j- we also hear of a Bureller buying woad, which looks as if they sometimes dyed it themselves,^ while it is noticeable that there is no mention at all of their ' burling ' the cloth. On the other hand, the Burellers claimed the right of having looms themselves because of their privileges as freemen.* That the Burellers did sell ' cloth of Candelwyke Strete ' we learn from a reference to certain members of the Craft who had sold sixty pieces to the King.^ All this, however, does not prove that the Burellers had a monopoly either of the making or selling cloth in London, since at the same time the Weavers are also mentioned as being allowed to sell.* The truth of the matter seems to be that there were several Grafts, then as at a later date, which did some selling, and and of Wallbrook, were condemned for conspiring together in the Church of St. Margaret de Patyns to raise the price of their labour. Liber Cust., II. i. 415. ' Letter Book E, fos. 243, 147, 147 b, 148. By the so-called custom of London, any citizen who was free of a Gild could carry on the trade of any other Gild. ^ C£ 421, 'Burellarius qui fecit filum'j 423, 'Si aliquis Burellarius detulerit filum aliquod texendum '. ^ Letter Book A, fo. 135 b. ■• Letter Book E, fos. 247, 247 b, 248. ^ Letter Book E, fo. 139 b. ^ Liber Cust., i. 423. 1603- 1 L 74 Early History of the Cloth Trade that the differentiation between the trading and manufacturing Gilds had not yet been clearly emphasized. The dilEculty of deciding the question whether the Drapers succeeded to the position of the Burellers lies in the absence of any direct evidence. It is true that the Burellers disappear just as the Drapers are becoming powerful. There is no notice of the Burellers in the Letter Books after ins-, nor in the Close or Patent Rolls. The last mention of them that I have found is of the date i3J-<5, when two Burellers make a bequest to the Fraternity of tbe Blessed Virgin Mary of St. Mary Abchurch in Candlewick Street.' In 1361, indeed, Richard de Essex, a Draper, mentions the Fraternity in Candlewick Street," and this may be the Fraternity of the Burellers, which also appears in the Will of John de Aylesham, a Mercer in 134^-^ Again, the absence of all mention of the Burellers in the Drapers' Charter of 1363 shows that they were not, then at least, their rivals. Moreover, Candelwick Street, where the Burellers did mostly congregate, became subsequently the chief home of the Drapers.'* In any case, the fact that the Burellers and the Drapers existed at the same time in London, and that the numbers of the members of both Crafts were numerous in the early fourteenth century, proves that at least the transition was gradual. It may be true that as the century wore on the Drapers absorbed or were recruited from the Burellers, who had apparently developed the function of employers, but the Burellers who are found in other towns, such as Marlborough, seem to have confined them- selves to the making of their special kind of rough cloth and of selling it, and it appears fer more probable to me that the dis- appearance of the name Bureller is to be explained by the feet that the cloth itself ceased to be made. At all events the original ' S harpe J Calendar of Wills, i. 69 J. ^ Ibid., ii. 301. 3 Ibid., i. 484. '' Lydgate in his London Lickpenny, published some time in the fifteenth century, says : ' Then went I forth by London stone Throughout all Canwyke Street Drapers much cloth me offered anone.* For , the meaning of ' London stone ', which is now built into the wall of St. Swithin's Church, c£ Lethaby, London before the Conquest, p. 179. to Close of the Thirteenth Century 75- function of the Drapers was, as we shall see, a wider and a different one. The tradition that Fitzalwyn, the first Mayor of London, The earliest Ii8p-i2i2, was a Draper, rests on no solid evidence, and though. Drapers, according to some authorities, the Drapers may claim William Hardel, the Mayor of 125-2, as of their Craft, this also is doubtful.' With the questionable exception of Fitzalwyn I have not been able to discover any notice of a Draper earlier than that of Pentecost Le Draper of the date of 1222 given by Mr. Ashley.' But as the centihry advanced they grew rapidly both in numbers and in importance. I have come across no less than forty-one Drapers of London between this date and the year 1300, and a district in Westcheap became known as the Drapery.^ ' Cf. Herbert, i. 399. Stow says Fitzalwyn was a Goldsmith. In a deed of 1 1 96 he is called a grandson of Leofstan, and one of the nobles of the City. Very possibly he was one of the hereditary Aldermen of London. The Company has, indeed, a certificate of William, Clarencieux King of Arms, of the date 1613, certifying the arms borne by Fitzalwyn, and that he was free of the Drapers' Company; c£ Book of Evidences, A, v. 290; but even heralds and Kings of Arms sometimes blunder. There is, however, a notice of his burial-place in the Ordinances Book (given in Appendix, vol. i, No. VIII) which says that he lies buried in the porch of St. Mary Bothaw ' sub lana marmorea'. This is the proper abbrevia- tion for lanura, which is an unknown word. If we could read linura for lanura, the words might be translated ' under a marble woolpack ', for linura is found in con- temporary documents in the sense of woollen tippets, and this would support the tradition that he was a Draper, but unfortunately the a. in ' lana ' is very clearly written. Most probably we should read ' sub lamina marmorea ' (a marble slab). The only other scrap of evidence in favour of Fitzalwyn being a Draper lies in the fact that he did possess a ' tenter ground ' or place for stretching cloths after the fulling process, but this does not prove that he used the ' tenter ground ' himself. Fitzalwyn's house and his property passed to Sir R. Aguylon, whose mother was Fitzalwyn's granddaughter. Aguylon left his house and garden, with the exception of a ' tenter ground ', to the Prior of Tortington. In 1 5 3 9 it was granted to John de Vere, Earl of Oxford, and in 1 64 1 it was purchased of its then owner, Capt. G. Smith, by the Salters' Company to become the Sakers' Hall. The ' tenter ground ', however, passed eventually to Eburton, a Draper, who left the tenements called Drapers' Hall in St. Swithin's Lane to his Com- pany (1490). It is therefore clear that the first Drapers' Hall was not Fitzalwyn's House, although probably it was built on the ' tenter ground which had belonged to him *. Cf. Stow, Survey, ed. Kingsford, ii. 3 1 5 ; Sharpe, Calendar of Wills, ii. 586 note, ^01. ' Ashley, Econ. Hist., II. iii. 249, note 74. Sharpe, Calendar of Wills, i. 49. The Drapert Function in the thirteenth century. ^6 Early History of the Cloth Trade That these Drapers were men of weight in the City itself- is sufficiently attested by the fact that, before the century closed, four, excluding Hardel and Fitzalwyn, were Mayors, all of whom had previously been Sheriffs, and three of whom had served as Aldermen. Further eight were Aldermen and Sheriffs, while one, Joseph L'Acatur, added to his aldermanry the position of member for the City in the Parliament of 1183.' Two Drapers also, Reginald de Frowyk and Richard de Gloucester, were on a Committee elected to approach Edward I, after his quarrel with Mayor Rokesly, with a petition that the privileges of the City should be restored.'' Nor was their influence confined to London, since two of them, Ivo de Linge and Robert Bernard, took part in the great political movement led by Simon de Montfort in laj-S.^ The word Draper is derived from the French word Draperie or cloth work, and ' to drape ' is generally interpreted to mean the ' making ' of cloth,* though Ducange gives various uses of the word. M. Pirenne, the great authority on the mediaeval history of the Low Countries, has personally informed me that in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries the Flemish Drapers, while they did not make cloth in the sense of weaving it, did superintend the whole process of its fabrication through its various stages of being woven, fulled, sheared and dyed, and that they then pressed it, folded it, and prepared it for the market. In France, as in Flanders, they are found in the fourteenth century employing the Weavers and the Dyers,= and at the close of the previous century we hear of a certain jean Boine Broke, Draper and Sheriff of Douai, who was a great merchant entrepreneur. He bought the raw material and placed it out to be made up by the various ■ Cf. Appendix, vol, i. No. II. I cannot find any evidence to prove that William Fitz Richard, who was twice Mayor (1159-60, 1 260-1), had previously been Alderman. But probably he had, since that was, at a later date at least, the invariable custom. = Letter Book B, fo. 34. 3 Chronicles of Mayors and Sheriffs, Camden Soc, pj 110. ^ Cf. the various uses of the word in Ducange. ^ Lavisse, Hist, de France, viii. 145; Lespinasse, Les Metiers de Paris, iii. 145 ; Pirenne, La Belgique, i. 170. Mr. Ashley thinks the Fullers were originally the employers in France. Econ. Hist., II. iii. 1 1 1. to Close of the Thirteenth Century 77 craftsmen, or rather he sold the wool to them and bought it back from them as cloth. Some dyeing and washing he apparently did in his own house. For the rest he prepared for the market and sold. His house was not a manufactory, but a d6p6t of raw material and of cloth and a place of business, where he sold not only the cloth thus made but other cloth.' Mons. Broke, in feet, like the Jack of Newbury of the time of Henry VIII, resembled a great modern entrepreneur, except that the actual industry was carried on in the homes of the workers instead of in a factory. He had reduced his employees to a condition of help less dependence. They were most of them in debt to him, many lodged in houses rented of him, and he had established a kind of truck system. In England of the thirteenth century, however, the cloth industry was only in its early stages, and I can find no Drapers who at all occupy the same position as that of Mons. Broke. I can discover no evidence of their superintending the manu- facture of cloth or of having anything to do with it. It is true that Fitzalwyn, the first Mayor of London, did possess a ' tenter ground ', or place for stretching cloth ; but, as we have just seen, it is doubtful whether he was a Draper. They do not appear to be buying wool or yarn or woad, although the Burellers do this,'' and, curiously enough, a Mercer, William Hauteyn, both buys wool and sells cloth at the fairs of St. Ives and St. Botolph and at Winchester.3 Nor indeed do we hear much of any London-made cloth other than Borel, which seems to disappear with the Burellers ; although the existence of the Weavers, the Shearers, the Fullers, and the Dyers in the City proves that the industry must have been established.'' It is true that the evidence I have collected only ' Vierteljahrschrift fiir Social- und Wirthschaftsgeschichte, iii. 3 f : Jean Boine Broke, Drapier de Douai, Espinas. ^ Letter Book A, ios. 19, 1 3 J b (William de Bristol, also called a ' chaloner ', fo.31). 3 Letter Book A, fos. 7, i6b. * In 1297 Fullers and Dyers are accused of sending cloths to be fulled at mills outside the City, instead of fulling them by the feet of men of their Craft or their servants in their houses within the City, and certain Dyers, Burellers, Weavers, 78 Early History of the Cloth Trade refers to a very limited number of persons, some eight, and these evidently rich merchants. It may be that the smaller Drapers were superintending the making of London-made cloth, though I am inclined to think that they were chiefly, if not exclusively, . engaged in the retail sale of foreign cloth ; but I am convinced that the more wealthy members, most of whom were Aldermen or Sheriffs, were at the time devoting themselves almost exclusively to the sale of cloth, and especially to the importation and sale of foreign cloth, which would be the more profitable business on account of its greater volume.' For the rest they appear to have been general merchants dealing in various wares and selling especially to the King.'' Nor is a reason wanting for this differ- ence. In the Netherlands the industry of making cloth was a very large one ; in England it was as yet not very important, and in London at least would be chiefly in the hands of the Burellers. The Drapers of London then, if not of England, were in all probability originally merchants like the Grocers, and not manufacturers; and if this is so, it is evident that their most formidable rivals must have been not so much the other makers of cloth in England, as the foreign merchants who had the start Fullers, and Taylors are summoned to make better provision for the Craft of Fullers. Letter Book C, fo. 37 ; D, fo. 1 12. It must be remembered that the Taylors were at that time called Linen armourers, and worked with linen, not with wool, devoting themselves more especially to making the linen linings for armour. They received a licence from Edward I, and their books go back to 1 1()<). ' The evidence for this statement has been collected from the following authorities : the Letter Books of the City, the Close Rolls, the Patent Rolls, and the Accounts of the Great Wardrobe. By far the most valuable of these evidences are the recognizances of debt, made either before the City or State officials, which are to be found in the Letter Books and Close Rolls. It is unfortunate that in the majority of cases we are only given the names of the debtors and creditors and the amount of the debt, not the cause of the debt. Probably in some — though not in all — cases the Draper had been lending money on credit. The other evidence is found in notices of seizures of goods by pirates and others, while in the Patent Rolls we here and there get some assistance from the records of those fined, or where their property has been confiscated. The most pertinent cases, arranged under heads, will be found in Appendix, vol. i, No. 11 B. ^ e. g. Linen, canvas, bed furniture, wax, furs, groceiy, wine. Cf. Close Rolls, 1 11 1, p. 483 5 1191, p. 480; 130O3P. 531. to Close of the Thirteenth Century 79 of them/ and who, even if they were Drapers, were dealing like the English Draper in other goods as well. But time was on the side of the Englishman. The foreign merchant was jealously watched," and could only sell his wares by wholesale, and then under severe restrictions. Before long the English Draper threatened to displace his rival not only in the English, but in the foreign markets. It is also most probable that many of these more opulent Drapers were money-lenders as well, like their contemporary Mons. Broke of Douai. ' The number of foreigners dealing in England in wool, cloth, cloth of gold, and other commodities, and also lending money on credit, more especially in the latter part of the thirteenth and the beginning of the fourteenth century, was very large. Amongst others, we hear of: The Societies of the Bardi, Bianchi, Cerchi-Bianchi, Frescobaldi, Mozi, Peruzzi, Scali, Spina of Florence, Veluti, the Spinelh of Genoa 5 the Societies of Puici and Rambertini of Florence and Perugia ; the Bellardi and Ricardi of Lucca ; the Bonsignori and Galerani of Siena ; the Chiarenti ; the Portinari ; the Rustigath of Placentia ; the Amenetti of Pistoia ; also numerous merchants from the Low Countries, especially from Antwerp, Amiens, Arras, Douai, Malines, St. Omer, also from Abbeville. Cf. Close Rolls, Indexes ; Dehaisnes, Essai sur les relations commercials de Douai avec I'Angleterre (Mdmoires lus i la Sorbonne, Paris, 1866); Letter Book A, fbs. 4*?, 71b; Close Rolls, 1188-95, pp. 204, 2J5, 382, 383, 384,647; I29(J-I302, pp. 259, 271,487; 1302-7, pp. J, 34, 87, 171, 290, 319, 343, 3J7, S^Oj 42.^, 483; 13*7, PP- 43j 495 2^3 ; 13293 PP- 44f, 4^3 5 i33°-i3 PP- i4j 7^, 267, 373, 385 ; 133^3 P- 4J9; 13333 P- 7; 1337, p. 2o5; 1338, pp. J48, J68; 1339, p. 225 ; 1346, p. 17 J ; Archaeologia, xxviii. 206 ; Owens Coll. Historical Essays, p. 137, ' Italian Bankers and their loans.' ^ On Merchant Strangers, cf. p. 2j, note 2, of this vol. CHAPTER II THE HISTORY OF THE DRAPERS FROM THE OPEN- ING OF THE FOURTEENTH CENTURY TO THE LETTERS PATENT OF EDWARD III, 1354. NTERESTING and startling changes The work of in the activities of the Drapers meet us the Drapers as we enter the fourteenth century. They JP ^^^ ^^^'^ import but little foreign cloth,^ and are c°nmiy deeply engaged in the export of English wool. The causes of this change before the year 1337 are not very clear. It is possible that the explanation is to be found partly in the more active competition of the foreign merchant, partly in the in- crease of the home cloth industry. We know that there were many foreigners still engaged in the import trade, while there is good evidence to show that the (') home industry was advancing. Posssibly also the Drapers were during these years the agents of the Crown in the export of wool, as they certainly were subsequently. How- ever that may be, with the year 1338 we come to surer ground. ' The initial comes from the Ordinance Book, p. ^6. ^ I have only come across three definite notices of the purchase of foreign cloth by a London Draper between 1300 and 13^3. In 1304 Stephen de Abyngdon buys cloth and other merchandise to the value of ^f 1,100 in Antwerp and Malines for the King's Wardrobe. Close Rolls, 1304, p. 143. Again, in 13 10, he buys cloth at Lans in Artois. Close Rolls, 1307-13, p. 145. In 1338 John Blakeneye loads ' Le Paternoster ' of London with salt, wine, and cloth in Normandy for England. Ibid., 1338, p. 4Jf. But there are plenty of instances of the Drapers selling cloth in England, and some of this was probably of foreign origin before the Statute of 1 3 3 7, which prohibited its import. 1603-1 M 8x History of the Drapers from the It will be remembered that in the previous year an Act of Parliament had been passed forbidding the import of cloth, and insisting that all, except the King and the royal family, should clothe themselves in homespun. The export of wool was also for- bidden, ' until the king and his council provided otherwise '. Of this proviso Edward III took advantage, when in 1338 Parlia- ment granted him the right of the pre-emption of ao,ooo' sacks of wool at his own price/ The chronicler Knighton tells us that he, or his agents, bought it at £6 the sack and sold it abroad for ;^2o.° Again, in 1 341, a grant of wool was made to the King, no one being allowed to export until the King was 'served of that granted to him '.^ Thus the King during these years had a large amount of wool to export, and he accordingly made use of the larger merchants for this purpose, and, among them, of some of the more wealthy Drapers, who, owing to their earlier dealings in foreign cloth, had the necessary knowledge and equipment. But here arose another complication. Since he was unable to get all the wool which he had been allowed to buy, or which had been granted, as speedily as his necessities demanded, he borrowed money on the wool from the merchants,* transferring to them his right to buy or to seize the wool, and gave them licences to export, often reducing, and in some cases surrendering to them, the customs payable. Finally, when the King was heavily in- debted to foreigners = for loans, the merchants would export the wool for the King and hand it over to his creditors, although in some cases the foreign merchants who had lent money were allowed to export on their own account.^ ' Cf. Order to Sheriff of York, 1338, Rymer, ii. lozz. ^ Knighton Coll. 2570. Ramsay, however, gives evidence to show that he did not on this occasion ever pay the purchase money, and that much of the wool was seized. Genesis of Lancaster, i. zy6, ^ ij Ed. III. iii, cc. 1, 3, f. The grant was of 30,000 sacks, of which 20,000 had been apparently raised in the previous year. Ramsay, Genesis of Lancaster, i, p. 291. * C£ Evidences in Appendix, vol. i. No. Ill B, and especially the cases of John de Lincoln, Darcy, Pulteney, and Botiller. In r3'5'o Edward even pledges his ' great crown ' to Thomas Swanlond and others. ' e.g. the Bardi and Peruzzi. Close Rolls, 1330-1, pp. 14-72, 267-373, 38?; 1338, p. 421 ; Merchants of Malines, 1338, p. j PP- 7^, 733 185, 557- _ ^ Cf. Rymer, ii. 988, 989, 1022, 105 1, 10J4, and references given in the Appendix. ^ Between 1311 and 1339 four Drapers held the office. Cf. Appendix, vol. i. No. Ill B. ■• Rymer, Foedera, Pars II, p. 67S. ' Thus cloth of half grain (scarlet) and whole grain : Andley, Hawes, Haydok, Kersey, Lumbard, Marbury de flur de vesz, Mendeps, Menuet, Porreye, Rayed cloths. Russet, Says of Causton, Louthe, Norwich, Worstede, and other places, Verten Veyr, Wadmol or Wadynell. Lo'ndon-made cloth : Rye and green cloth of Candelwickstrete. Cloths of Beverley, Bristol, Cornwall, Devon, Essex, Kent, Lincoln, Norfolk (worsted cloth of), S. Osyth, Stamford, Suffolk, Win- chester, York. Letter Book E,pp. J3, 54; C,p. 1^3 j Close Rolls, 134^, p. ii^; 84- History of the Drapers from the 1 345-' and the notable increase in the excise on cloth during the later years of Edward III ' prove that the trade in cloth was ad- vancing. That in this development the Drapers had a large share may perhaps be best gathered from a petition of theirs of the year 133^, which asserts that it is the manner of Drapers to make their purchases of cloth at home and abroad about Michael- mas for the fairs ensuing.^ Although we have not much positive evidence of their selling cloth except to the King and the Great Wardrobe, the majority of the debts owed to them by influential persons could not well have been for anything else,* and most of the cloth must have been home-made as long as the Act of 1337, which forbade the import of foreign cloth, was enforced. Nor again have we met with any definite instance of Drapers exporting cloth ; yet, inasmuch as denizens were charged a lower duty on such export than aliens,^ the Drapers, we may be sure, would take advantage of this preference. That some London Drapers were at this time engaged in superintending the manufacture of cloth does indeed gain some support from the statement that John Swanlond, who was also actively engaged as agent of the King in the export of wool, did in 1338' buy wool at Lincoln to make cloth for magnates and others of the realm ' ; ® while from a petition of the Merchant Patent Rolls, 1347, p- 4*5 ; 1348, pp. 27, 287 ; 13 JJ, p. 471 ; Liber Cust., II. i. 1 2 J. Cf. Glossary for explanation of the terms, ibid., II. ii. ^93. ^ Letter Book F, fo. 108. The duty of the Broker was to assist in making a fair bargain between buyer and seller. He was allowed to charge a fixed fee. He might traffic on his own account. He was appointed by the Mysteries who represented the trade, and was sworn before the Mayor and Aldermen. At one time the office was suppressed because the Broker was accused of the ' orrible crime- of false chevisauns ' (bargaining). Liber Albus, ed. Riley, pp. 23^*273 ; Letter Book I, fos. 8, 66 b; Arnold's Chronicle, ed. i8ii, p. 73. ^ Before the year 1347 the receipts from the excise on cloth never rose higher than ;f 23 6s. 6d. ; after that date it is never less than ^^47, and in one year (1358) it rose to af 1,061 i6s. ^^d. C£ Ramsay, Genesis of Lancaster, ii. loi, Table II. ' Letter Book F, fo. 197. * C£ Appendix, vol. i. No. Ill B. Possibly the Drapers were also acting as money-lenders to great men, as they certainly did to the King. ' Patent Rolls, 1347, p. 424. ^ Close Rolls, 1338, p. 226. opening of the Fourteenth Century to 1^64. 85- Drapers in 135-0, already mentioned, it appears that they even made liveries.^ But it is not definitely stated that Swanlond did himself super- intend the making of the cloth, and it is significant that the Drapers who ' made ' the liveries are definitely stated to have bought the cloth. In any case it is difficult to believe that, if the more important Drapers of London were at this time seriously devoting themselves to making, or superintending the making of cloth, or to finishing it, the notices would be so scanty. In my opinion this fiinction was still being performed by the Burellers, of whom, as shown before, we have many notices in the early fourteenth century.' Here once more, however, we must bear in mind that our evidence bears only upon the fortunes of the Drapers of London, and of a small number, the wealthier, of these. As to the work of the more numerous and less wealthy members of the Craft our authorities are silent. We shall not, however, probably be wrong in concluding that the smaller Drapers were as before chiefly engaged in selling cloth by retail in their shops. The last item of interest which is to be gathered from these evidences is that many of these Drapers were engaging in other trades besides their own. Between 1 3 10 and 1345 four Drapers are also called Hosiers, one is called a Woolmonger, one a Clothier, and one a Cordwainer ; some, as stated above, are making liveries, while of Richard de WeUeford it is recorded in 1 3 1 8, that he sold ' divers victuals and garnistures ' to H. Nazard, another Draper, for the King's use.^ It wiU be seen that this practice was forbidden by Statute in 1^6^.* Thus the evolution of the functions of the Drapers of London The gradual up to this date would seem to be as follows. They first appear as evolution of general merchants like the Grocers and the Goldsmiths, dealing the functions originally in foreign cloth and other articles. When the importa- Drapers ^ ' The manner of drapers is to make their purchases of cloth at home and abroad . . . and to make liveries for great lords and others of the Commons,' 1350. Letter Book F, fb. 197 ; Rot. P*:l., ii. 230. Note also that in 1361 a royal proclama- tion dealing more especially with London makes a distinction betvireen ' pannarii ' and 'factores pannorum '. Foedera, IIL ii. 67S. ° Cf. p. 72 of this volume. ^ Calendar of Close Rolls, 1313-18, p. J49. * 37 Ed. III., cc. f, 6. S6 History of the Drapers from the tion of foreign cloth is forbidden, they for a time turn to the export of home-grown wool. As the home cloth industry de- velops, and as' the various trades become more specialized, they devote themselves especially to the purchase and sale both at home and abroad of cloth, and that chiefly home-made. It is possible that at the same time they began tentatively to engage in the superintendence of the making of the article or of finishing it by shearing and dyeing, and even in making liveries, a business which to-day would be that of a tailor. But in any case they had not developed this side of their business to any great extent at the date when their Charter was granted, nor, as we shall see, does the manufacture of cloth ever become one of their important activities. As merchants they first appeared, and merchants the most prosperous of them chiefly remained, while the less opulent of their craft turned to the retail trade and served their customers in their shops. An interesting parallel to the evolution of the London Drapers is to be found in the history of the Florentine Arte de Calimala.' The members of this Florentine Gild were dealers in foreign, chiefly Flemish and French, cloth, which they bought in the fairs of Champagne. This cloth, though of fine texture, was generally bought by them in the rough. They then dyed and finished it in Florence, and exported it more especially to the East, while the humbler members of the Gild were retail dealers in the City itself The cloth was highly esteemed on account of the brilliancy of its colour. The climax of the prosperity of the Arte de Calimala was in the last half of the thirteenth century. It then somewhat declined, more especially owing to the French and English wars which closed the fairs of Champagne. It was now the turn of the Arte di Lana. The members of this Gild had hitherto only worked with Italian wool which was inferior. They now began to import better wool from England and from Spain, and to compete with their rivals of the Arte de Calimala. ' Doren, Florentine!- Wirthschaftsgeschichte, especially i. 10-56, 102,108-60, 130; ii. 9, 6q6 ; Dixon, Trans. R. Hist. Soc, New Series, xii. 182. It is interesting to note that the English wool was sent by sea to Bordeaux and hence transported partly by water carriage to the Mediterranean, partly overland to the Rhone, and thence across the Alps. opening of the Fourteenth Century to 1364 87 As we should expect, the number of Drapers increases very Increase in materially in the fourteenth century. Thus between the first number of year of the century and the granting of the Letters Patent in f**^ Drapers 1364, we have met with no less than 130 ; of whom seven were fourte^enth Mayors (five of whom had been Sheriffs and Aldermen), eight century, more were Sheriffs and Aldermen, and five more Aldermen only. During this period also ten Drapers were representatives of the City in Parliament,^ while in 1329 we find three Drapers among the twenty-four chosen to attend on the young King, Edward III, to answer whether the City would punish the partisans of Henry Duke of Lancaster, who had just made his unsuccessfiil attempt to overthrow the rule of the hated Mortimer, the paramour of the Queen-Dowager.^ That the Drapers were men of considerable substance may be gathered, not only from the numerous bequests made by them to churches, chantries, and charitable objects,^ but by the place several of them take in the Subsidy Rolls of ijip* and 1322, and by their grants and loans to Edward III for his French Wars. The first notice of a Draper lending money to the King in the fourteenth century which we have come across is in 13 op, when John de Lincoln is recorded as having lent ;^i^2 ipj-. to the late King Edward I for his French Wars. Under Edward III the ' For list cf. Appendix, vol. i, No. Ill A. It is curious that some Mayors and some members of Parliament had neither been Sheriffs nor Aldermen. We should expect members of Parliament to have been at least Aldermen, and subsequently it became a rule that the Mayor should have previously served as SheriiF and Alderman. It may be that the list of Aldermen and Sheriffs is not quite complete, since our authorities are not always as clear, or as full, as we could wish. We have generally followed Beaven, Aldermen of the City of London, for the Aldermen; and Mr. Kingsford in his edition of Stow, ii. ijo ff., for the Sheriffs, except where we have round additional evidence. ^ Cf Rolls Series, Chronicles of Ed. I and Ed. II., i. 241. They were Simon de Swanlond, John de Pulteney, Stephen de Abyngdon. Lancaster finally overthrew Mortimer in the following year, 1330. ' Sharpe, Calendar of Wills, i. 413, ii. 57, J 8. * Thus in 1 3 19 Stephen de Abingdon and Henry Nazard are assessed at ;f 100, Simon de Swandlond at £zo and Richard Constantin ten marks. Cf also the subsidy of 1331, when Thos. de Swandlond pays z6s. id., John de Weston 6s. M., and Will, de Macchyng 4/. Subsidy Rolls, Record Office, London, 144/2, 144/3, antl 144/4- 88 History of the Drapers from the loans and grants become much more frequent. The most important of these are to be found in the Appendix, vol. i, No. Ill b. Here it will suffice to say that in 1 3 ^5 two Drapers, Richard Constantyn and Richard Kyselyngbery, lend 60s. each for ships sent to sea, while twelve Drapers contribute a further ;i^3 o to a loan ; that in 1 3 39 eighteen Drapers contribute sums varying from ;^4o to £s each towards a loan of ;^5-,ooo; that in 13^0 the 'great Crown' is pledged to Thos. Swanlond and others for ;^4,ooo, and in the same year Swanlond and others lend as much as ;^ao,ooo on the customs, while in 1365 the 'Mystery of the Drapers ' in its corporate capacity makes a present of £^0 to the King, a sum which is not exceeded by that of any other Company.' Finally, in the following year, the date of their Charter, they give 10 marks probably towards the ransom of the French King John, who had been taken prisoner at Poitiers; though whether this was in their corporate capacity or as individuals is uncertain.' John Among the Drapers who play a part in the history of London Pulteney, ^nd of England during this period, one man, John Pulteney, the Draper, g^^j^^jg pre-eminent. Born at the village of Pontenei or Putton- heath in Leicestershire, in which county we find him subse- quently holding property at Newton Heath, he came to London and rapidly rose. We do not know when or how he joined the Society of Drapers, but in 1 3 1(5 he was wealthy enough to stand ' mainpenor ' or surety for certain merchants. In 1328 he became Alderman of Coleman Street Ward, and in the following year was appointed by the Mayor and Commonalty of London to be one of the Wardens for the City at Winchester Fair.^ He was of ^ Twenty-seven other Mysteries subscribe : the Mercers, /40 ; Fishmongers, if40 ; Skinners, ^40 , the rest, varying sums down to zoj-. which is contributed by the Glovers. The total sum presented by all the Gilds was 3^428 9/. /^d. Letter Book G, £0. 133. Cf. 'English Nouveaux-Riches in the fourteenth century ' ; the writer, in Transactions Royal Hist. Society, New Series, xv. (J3, shows the inaccuracy of Mrs. A. S. Green's statement that it was loans of Florentine merchants which alone enabled Edward III to carry on the French War. Town Life, i. 79. ^ Letter Book G, fo. 133. ' Drapers often held this office, e. g. Ralph Upton and Richard de Berkynge in 1334. Letter Book E, fo. 137 b. opening of the Fourteenth Century to 13(^4 89 such importance that in the next year he was appointed one of the twenty-four citizens chosen to wait on the young King, Edward III. He evidently fulfilled his task to the satisfaction of his fellow citizens, for in the following year (1330) they elected him Mayor, an office which he held four times (13 30-1, 1331-2, 1333-4, i3 3^~'7)5 ^i^d, although he was never Sheriff, he was appointed several times Escheator of the King in the City, Commissioner of Oyer and Terminer in Essex, Middlesex, and Surrey, and in 1332 was on a commission to inquire into the establishment of a staple of wool at Bruges in defiance of the Statute which had removed the staple from that city. He had by this time placed his wealth at the disposal of royal personages, for in 1 3 3 1 he was granted lands in recompense for debts owed him by Edmund, Earl of Kent, the unfortunate uncle of the young King, who had suffered on the block the year before for his complicity inLancaster's plot against Mortimer. These lands were probably the Manors of Ditton Camoys in Cambridgeshire, and of Sheriley in Hertfordshire. In the year 1334 he was elected Alderman of Candelwick Ward, and in the same year Nicholas de Farndon devised to him the aldermanry of Farringdon within Ludgate and Newgate Without, though whether he ever held it is uncertain.' Meanwhile, he was employed in the nego- tiations with Flanders which preceded the outbreak of war with France. On his return, in 1 3 3 y, he was deputed by the City to arrange with the Crown for the supply of loo ' hobelours ' (light armed horse soldiery) at the cost of the City, for 100 days to serve in the Scotch War, and was appointed one of the leaders of the Londoners in case of invasion. In 1 3 3 6 he became Alder- man of Vintry Ward. In 1331 he was knighted and received a grant of 100 marks in tail for the better support thereof In the following year, however, he was imprisoned in Somerton Castle because, having been appointed to certain offices during the King's absence beyond the sea, he was with others accused ' of ' This devise of an aldermanry is interesting as showing that at that date the aldermanry of Farringdon was still an hereditary one. Richard Lacer seems to have been Alderman of the Ward till 13^7, and then John de Chichester was elected. Cf. Sharpe, Calendar of Wills, i. 398, 609 ; ii. 59. 1603-1 N 90 History of the Drapers from the having borne himself fraudulently and unfaithfully '.' He was, however, soon released. In 1 340 he was on a Commission to discuss 'le chevaunce de BrusseP with merchants', and in 1J41 he was given permission to send 160 sacks of wool free of custom to Bruges to pay for the ransom of William de Montacute, Earl of Salisbury, who had been taken prisoner in the French "War. In 134.7 he received from the Bigods the Manor of Poplar and the messuage of Cold Harbour in the parish of St. Laurence Pountney, and there he built a great house. He also held the Manors of Southall Murray and Woolwich, and a house called the Manor of the Rose or Poultney's Inn, in Downegate Ward. Two years later he died (134.5). The extent of his wealth may be gathered from his numerous loans to the King,^ and his munificent gifts made during his life and under his will,* while his social position may be guessed from ' Patent Rolls, 1341, p. no. ° ' Chevaunce de Brussel.' The Agreement of Brussels. This was the Treaty of November or December 1339 made with the Duke of Brabant, by which commerce between the two countries was to be encouraged. Voisin, p. 19. ' In 133 1 he lent :f47i. In 1333 he went shares with another Draper, Geoffrey le Bottelur to farm the King's debt of jfijJiS 9/. zd. to the Gascon cities. Transactions Royal Hist. Soc, New Series, ix. 59. * His benefactions during his lifetime were : 1330. Grant of certain shops at St. Nicholas at Shambles to the master and brethren of the hospital of St. Bartholomew for the purpose of endowing a chantry. 1332. A chantry in honour of Corpus Christi at the Church of St. Laurence in Candelwick Street, which was subsequently enlarged to form a college for a master, thirteen priests, and four choristers. The church henceforth became known as that of St. Laurence Pountney. Further, he gave 10 marks for repair of the Guildhall. He also built the church of All Hallows the Less in Thames Street, a church for Carmelite friars at Coventry, and a chapel in St. Paul's where he was buried. Under his will he made the following bequests : I. To a chantry for three priests in St. Paul's. z. To the collegiate chapel of Corpus Christi 6s. Sd., and all his tenements and rents in London, except Poultney's Inn, his tenement of Cold Harbour and his other tenements in the parish of All Hallows the Great, subject to certain payments to the Almoner of St. Paul's and the poor of Newgate. 3 . His principal mansion, Poultney's Inn, he left to his wife and his son, as well as the 100 marks settled on him to support his knighthood. This subsequently opening of the Fourteenth Century to 13^4. 91 the feet that the Bishop of London and the Earl of Huntingdon, to whom he left valuable legacies, were two of his executors. In the year 1742 his lineal descendant was created the Earl of Bath. Following the usual custom of trades to concentrate in certain Cornhill localities we find these Drapers of London mostly collected in or and then about Cornhill, especially in Burcheour (Birchin) Lane. By the Candlewick time of Henry V, however, they had partly removed to Candle- chief abode wick Street (Cannon Street), which had been the chief resort, first of the of the foreign Weavers and then of the Burellers.' Drapers. became the site of Merchant Taylors' School. Clode, ii. 160. Cold Harbour was * to be sold. To the supervisors of his executors, Sir Ralph de Stratford, Bishop of London, a ring with a iniby ; the Earl of Huntingdon, a ring with two diamonds, two silver flagons enamelled, a cup and spoon and a salt cellar to match. For the life of Sir John Pulteney, c£ Diet, of National Biography and authorities quoted there. Also Beaven, Aldermen, vol. ii, index ; Riley, Memorials, Index; Rymer, Foedera, iii. 1139; Stow, Survey of London, ed. Kingsford, i. 106, 2j6 ; ii. 321, 322 ; Fabyan, Chron., ed. ElUs, 1811, p. 422 ; Sharpe, Calen- dar of Wills, i. 609 ; and references under his name in Appendix, vol. i, No. Ill a. ' Herbert, i. 401, says this is proved by the number of their notices of inter- ment still to be found in the churches thereabouts. Unfortunately on inquiry I can find no such evidence. The tower and steeple of the second church of St. Swithin's appears to have been built by John Hende the Draper, and twice Mayor, 1391, 1404 : White, History of the Ward of Walbrook, 1904, p. 407 ; and there are several Drapers' wills referring to churches in these Wards in the fifteenth century. Cf. Sharpe, Calendar of Wills, ii. 319, 387, 554, 584, ^31. Cf also the ordinance in Guildhall MSS., No. 142, which speaks of Drapers of Cornhill. From the accounts of 1429 they appear to have been at that date about equally divided between Cornhill and Candlewick Street. It is curious that only one Draper, Rich, de Gloucester, was Alderman of Cornhill Ward in the fourteenth century, and he in the first year of that century (1301), while there were five who were Aldermen of Candlewick Ward : Simon de Swanlond 1327 John de Pulteney 1334 John Keende John Walcote Thomas Noket On the other hand, in the fifteenth century there were four Drapers who were Aldermen in each Ward. Beaven, Aldermen. For localization of other trades, cf Ashley, Econ. Hist., II. i. 57, note 4 ; Stow, ed. Kingsford, i. 79. He quotes Fitzstephen, who noticed this as early as the Early in- stances of semi-corpo- rate action on the part of the Drapers. 92 History of the Drapers from the As to the date when they first became organized in a Gild or Fraternity it is diiEcult to speak with certainty. In the preamble to their ordinances, which were drawn up in the sixth year of Henry IV (1405-), they assert that the Fraternity was founded in 1532.' They might have made an earlier claim. As early as 1 5 1 2, at the celebration of the birth of Edward III, they, with the Mercers and Vintners, are mentioned as wearing a special livery,'' and in the same year we find that John Simeon, a foreign Draper, was forced to renounce the freedom of the City because he had not been admitted with the consent of the Mystery of Drapers. These evidences show that they were then recognized as a Craft. 3 Sixteen years later (1328) an entry in the Letter Books tells us that six men were in that year elected and sworn before the Mayor for the government and instruction of the Drapers.'* This was also done with respect to twenty-four other Crafts, and may be taken as a proof that, by that time at least, the Drapers had obtained recognition as a Society from the Mayor. Eleven years later (13 yi) there is clear evidence of their acting in their corporate capacity. It was in this year, when the Common Council was for the first time elected by the Mysteries instead of the Wards, that the Drapers, together with twelve reign of Henry II. For a similar phenomenon m Florence, cf. Doren, Florentiner Wirthschaftsgeschichte, ii. 616. ' Book of Ordinances. C£ Appendix, vol. i, No. XVII. ^ Sharpe, London and the Kingdom, i. 1 3 9. ^ Letter Book E, fo. 4. ^ Letter Book E, fo. 190. The Drapers selected were : Simon de Swanlond ; Thomas de Blakeneye ; Geoffrey Le Botteler ; John de Wrytele ; Richard de Berkynge ; Richard de Welleford. The other Gilds whose officers were sworn were : The Goldsmiths The Fishmongers The Grocers The Mercers The Vintners The Skinners The Taylors or Linen Armourers The Apothecaries The Ironmongers The Saddlers The Woolmongers The Beaders The Cordwainers The Girdlers The Butchers The Cutlers The Cappers The Cofferers The Corders The Haberdashers The Hosiers The Fusters The Painters The Cheesemongers opening of the Fourteenth Century to 13^4 93 other Gilds, are authorized to elect four members. Their position among the other Gilds may be gathered from the number of representatives given to each Gild. The Grocers, the ^'ish- mongers, and the Mercers have six; the Drapers, the Gold- smiths, the Woollen Workers, the Skinners, the Vintners, the Saddlers, the Taylors, the Cordwainers, the Butchers, four each ; the Ironmongers, two.' In the same year the Drapers take corporate action in petition- ing against the Statute of Cloth.^ ' Whereas ', they say, ' it has been ordained in the last Parliament that all manner of cloth sold after Sep. i should be of a certain assize, and the manner of Drapers is to purchase cloth both at home and abroad about Michaelmas for the fairs ensuing, and to make liveries for great lords and others of the commons ; and whereas these have not bought any liveries of importance this year, the cloth remains unsold, they pray therefore that the King and his Council will order the King's aulnager (launeor),^ or some one else, to market all the cloth so left on their hands, so that they may sell the cloth as it is (pur tieus come ils sont) ; . . . and what they buy in future shall be of the assize ordained.' It is somewhat curious that, though there are several earlier First bequests to Fraternities by Drapers, there is no mention of any religious 'Fraternity' of Drapers earlier than ix6i, unless indeed the F"'^fJ^'"'y °* Fraternity in Candlewick Street, to which Richard de Essex made ,,^j ' a bequest, was one connected with his trade.* The Drapers, at ' Letter Book F, fos. zo6, zjS ; Baddeley, Aldermen of Cripplegate, p. iiy. The five representatives of the Drapers were William Welde, John de Bures, Simon de Bedyngton, John de Kelyngworthe, Stephen Cavendisshe, William de Holbech. Next year the election was given back to the Wards. In 1376 the Mysteries regained the right and retained it till 1384, when it was finally restored to the Wards (cf. Introd., pp. 28, 39). ^ Letter Book F, Introd. p. xxvi, fos. 197, 199-201 b ; Statute of Cloth, 13 Ji, 2 J Ed. Ill, St. 4. ^ For the Aulnager seep. 116^ of this volume. ♦ It would seem that the earliest Gilds were almost always religious, and that at first they were not connected with any particular trade. Thus among the Gild certificates of 1389 there are few except this one of the Drapers that is so connected, while to the Fraternity of St. Giles, Cripplegate, a Blader (Corn- monger), two Brewers, a Saddler, two Painters, a Poulterer and a Currier, all make bequests between 13^1 and 1410. C£ Toulmin Smith, Gild Certificates of 94 History of the Drapers from the all events in that year (i3(5i), founded at the church and hospital of St. ' Bethlem ' the Brotherhood of our Lady of Bethlehem for the amendment of their lives, ' in the honour of our Lord Jesus Christ, and his Sweet Mother Saint Mary of Bethlehem, in which most Holy Place our Lord Jesus Christ was born for the salvation of all his people. In which place of Bethlehem the star appeared to the shepherds, and gave and showed light to the three kings of Cologne, who offered in the said place of Bethlehem three gifts, to wit gold, myrrh and incense.' The ordinances which were then drawn up for the government of the Brotherhood are of the greatest interest.' We learn from them that women as well as brothers could be members ; that no one of ill feme could become or remain a member ; that all were to pay 20J-. for entry and 6d. a quarter (or "xs. a year) for quarterage; that all brothers and sisters were to be clothed in a prescribed dress on public occasions at their own expense ; that all the members were to meet four times a year; that the revenues of the Brotherhood should be in the hands of three Wardens, who were to be elected annually, and that after the election, held on the Day of the Purification, a feast should be given in the Hospital of St. Mary of Bethlem ', which should not cost the brethren more than 2.0 d. a head. They have a Beadle and a Chaplain who receive payments and a livery fi-om the members, and the fraternal and religious aspects of the association are also strongly emphasized. All improper or gambling games were forbidden on pain of a fine. Any brother having a grievance against another was to complain to the Brotherhood and not elsewhere, and any one not 1389; Clare Market Review, i. 6j. Cf. also the Drapers of Beverley who paid special reverence to the Virgin, the Baptist, St. Michael the Archangel, and acted a miracle play of ' The Dooming Pilate * on the Feast of Coi-pus Christi. Leach, Beverley Town Documents, Selden Society, p. 99. So, too, the Drapers of Shrewsbury were incorporated under the name of the Gild of the Holy Trinity and Fraternity of Drapers. Rope, Earliest Book of Drapers of Shrewsbury. ' These ordinances are said to have been drawn up between 1351 and 1370 and then finally read and confirmed. Cf. Appendix, vol. i, No. IV. They were among the Gild certificates demanded of the Gilds in 1389, and are found in the Guildhall MS. 142, fos. 1^4-74. opening of the Fourteenth Century toi'^6^ 95- submitting to the decision of the Fraternity, as well as any one who practised deceit on the common people, in slander of the Brotherhood, was to be ousted. Any one falling into misfortune should be helped by the Brotherhood, and a dirge and masses should be said for every departed brother in the church of the Hospital of ' St. Mary of Bethlem V where ' a brother may be buried if he will ' ; for the which purpose and for the amendment of the Brotherhood the members were urged to leave a portion of silver, each according to his power. Thus by the year 13 5 3 the Drapers were a strong and in- Position of fluential body of men. They had been recognized by the Mayor f '^^ Drapers as a Craft with its governors, and also had formed a religious '" '^ ^' Fraternity which at once gave them a bond of union and supplied a religious sanction for the enforcement of their regulations. But their position was not yet secure. Their monopoly of selling, and certainly of finishing, cloth and thereby obtaining the profits, which fall to the trader, was disputed by many Mysteries, especially by the Dyers, the Weavers, and the Fullers.^ This struggle was not confined to the wool trade nor to England. In France it was the Fullers who originally finished the cloth and sold it to the public,^ and in England the complaint that all Mysteries were engaging in the selling of other articles than those of their peculiar trade, and generally interfering with the handicraft of others, was so loud that in 1^61 a Statute was passed which, on the ground that merchants ' called grossers do ingross all manner of merchandise vendible, and suddenly do enhance that price of such merchandise within the realm ', enacted ' that no English merchant shall use no ware nor merchandise . . . but only one ' The Hospital of St. Mary of Bethlehem without Bishopsgate was founded in 1147 by Simon Fitzmary, Sheriff of London. Cf Stow, ed. Kingsford, i. 51, 1(^4, 297-8. The hospital was an appropriate place, considering that the con- fraternity was dedicated to the Virgin of Bethlehem 5 c£ The Story of Bethlehem, by E. G. O'Donoghue (Unwin & Co.). The Skinners also had a Brother- hood at the Hospital. Stow, i. 230. ^ The mention of John Lovekyn in 1342, who had transferred himself from the Shearmen to the Drapers, looks as if the Shearmen had also been unsuccess- fiilly competing for the trade in cloth. Letter Book F, p. 2, fly-leaf ^ Ashley, Econ. Hist., Bk. 11, c. iii, p. 212. 9^ History of the Drapers from the which he shall choose - . . and that artificers, handicraft people hold them every one to one Mystery '.' Fortified by this Statute the Drapers renewed their efforts. Already in 1362 it had been ordained that no Dyer or Weaver should ' make ' cloth, and finally in 1353 the Drapers succeeded in obtaining their first definite recognition fiom the Crown." Their first The Charter or Letters Patent of 38 Ed. Ill, after citing Charter. jjig Act of 1353, proceeds to state ' that because people belonging to divers Mysteries, who had not been apprenticed to, nor had been sufficiently instructed in the Mystery of the business of Drapery, . . . engage in the same trade, one can scarcely find any shop in the City in which there is not some Drapery offered for common sale ', and that whereas such people, ' not having suf ficient knowledge of the price of goods belonging to the mer- chandise of the Mystery of Drapery (i. e. the selling price of Drapery), by their ignorance and by the great " engrossment " which they make of all kinds of cloth, have enhanced the price, and further that whereas dyers, weavers, and fullers have not confined themselves to their proper handicraft, but have engaged in the " making of cloth " and have refused to work at their own trades except at excessive wages, and have even perpetrated various frauds in the making, frauds which cannot be well detected unless the Drapers only have full knowledge of such work, and have also bought other cloth by way of forestalling, so that it was twice sold before coming to common sale ; the which things are the chief cause of the excessive dearness of cloth '. Therefore for the ftiture none shall use the said Mystery of Drapery in the city of London or its suburbs, unless he has been apprenticed in the said Mystery, or in other due manner received by the common assent of the same Mystery; that Dyers, Weavers, and Fullers shall keep to their proper craft and ' in no way meddle with the making, buying or selling of any manner of cloth ' 3 8 Ed. Ill, cc. J, 6. Qi. Appendix, vol. i, No. I. It is noticeable that women were exempted from the provisions of the Statute : ' All women, that use and work all handyworks, may freely use and work as they have done before.' ^ Letter Book G, fo. loi : 'Nos commandons de par notre Seignieur le Roi que nul teyntor ne teler soit si hardi de faire nul maner de drap sur peine de forfaire tut le drap issint par eux fait.' opening of the Fourteenth Century to 13^4 97 or drapery ' on pain of forfeiture, and that no one who has cloth to sell shall sell it except to the Drapers, unless it be to the lords and others of the commons who wish to buy it for their own use, and even then it shall be sold in gross and not in retail. The Letters Patent authorize the Drapers to elect four persons ' 'to oversee that no deceit or fraud be used in the Mystery of Drapers ', to rule and govern the Mystery, and to punish those in whom default shall be found, by the aid of the Mayor and Sheriffs if need be. The franchises and free customs of the Prior of St. Bartholomew, of Smithfield, and of lords who have fairs in the suburbs, and the franchises granted to the Merchant Vintners of England and Gascony are, however, to remain in force, anything in this Statute notwithstanding." ' They have as yet no Master. " C£ Appendix, vol. i, No. VI. CHAPTER III THE HISTORY OF THE GILD OR FRATERNITY OF THE DRAPERS FROM THE LETTERS PATENT OF EDWARD III (1364) TO THE YEAR 1475. EFINITE authority from the Crown to organize and govern their Mystery had now been obtained by the Drapers. With the exception of the Weavers, who had obtained a Royal Charter as early as the reign of Henry II, only four Gilds, the Goldsmiths, the Skinners, the Taylors, and the Girdlers, had secured this privilege, some thirty-six years before, while two others, the Fishmongers and the Vintners, obtained their Charter in the same year as the Drapers. The Fellowship had also for the moment secured the coveted The struggle monopoly of the retail sale of cloth in London, so far as the law f°'' ^^^ '"o- could give it. But their monopoly did not last, nor was it ever "op°'yoff"e complete. The Statute 38 Ed. Ill, c. 11 (1364), repealed the dotj, clause of the previous year, and in il6s an ordinance of the Mayor again allowed a member of one Mystery to pursue another Mystery and to trade in all kinds of merchandise.^ The Statute 17 Ric. II, c. a (13P3-4), allowed every man of the realm to put ' The initial letter comes from Charter No. XI. " This ordinance, which reasserted what was called the ' Custom of London ', was, however, generally resented, and hence the numerous translations from Gild to Gild in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. loo History of the Gild ofDrapers to sale cloths as well as kerseys of his own making, while that of 7 Henry IV, c. p (1405-), allowed all ' Drapers and sellers of Drapery of whatsoever place of the realm ' to sell in London by gross. Evidence also exists to prove that there was much evasion of the monopoly of the London Drapers. From a petition of the Fullers in 1 3 5p it appears that they did some selling of their own goods.' In 1375- we find two Fullers sharing the right to examine cloth with two Drapers,'' and in igpo the Fullers were allowed to expose their own cloth for sale in their houses or elsewhere ^ (although this may have been by wholesale only, as had been allowed by the Charter), so long as the buyers used the cloth for their own use. The privileges of the Merchant Vintners of England and Gascony had been especially reserved in the Letters Patent, and no doubt the Drapers also met with com- petition from the Taylors or Linen Armourers, with whom, as we shall see, they had, in the fifteenth century, a serious quarrel with regard to the right of search. In the recitals of the Charter of i^oz, which incorporated the Taylors under the new title of the Merchant Taylors, they claim to ' have occupied and used of old the buying and selling of aU and every merchandise whatsoever, and especially woollen cloths as well wholesale and retail throughout the whole realm of England and particularly within our city aforesaid and the suburbs thereof'.* Nevertheless, in the fourteenth century the business of the Taylors was chiefly in making linen apparel, more especially linen lining for armour, and in making up cloth,s and it was not till their later incorpora- ' Letter Book G, fo. 240 j Riley, Memorials, p. 341. =" Letter Book H, fo. 23. ^ Letter Book G, fo. 1 16. ■* Clode, Merchant Tailors, i. 198. ' Cf. Regulations for Armourers, Riley, Mem., 14^. The quarrel for the possession of the retail trade was not confined to London or to England. ' In several English towns the Drapers and Tailors were united in the same company. In Coventry the place of the Drapers was taken by the Shearmen, and the Mystery play was presented by the company of Shearmen and Tailors.' Ashley, Econ. Hist., ii. 213. In Paris the Fullers secured the privilege of selling to the public, though they were often called Drapers, till in the middle of the fourteenth century Royal Letters divided the Drapers into two classes, the Manufacturers and the Traders. Ashley, Econ. Hist., ii, 212 ; Unwin, Industrial Organization, p. 30. from 13(^4 to 1479 loi tion as Merchant Taylors, in i/oi, that they definitely devoted themselves to the business of buying and selling. Nor, again, did the Mercers or Haberdashers as yet seriously compete. It may be held, therefore, that in spite of some excep- tions, the Drapers really enjoyed by fer the most considerable part of the trade of cloth in London both in gross and in retail. Of the other Crafts concerned in the making of cloth, the Weavers, the Dyers, the Fullers, and the Shearmen abandoned the retail trade of cloth and fell into a subordinate position to the Drapers. Thus we are told that in 1385- Brembre, in pursuance of his policy of attempting to keep people to their proper Craft, dis- franchised William Southbrook ' free of the Weavers, as well as a Taylor for that they occupied Drapery V while in the early part of the fifteenth century we hear of one Shearman being fined, after the search of his measure by the Drapers, of another who was apprenticed to the Drapers, and later of Shearmen and Fullers entering the Drapers' Fellowship and having apprentices.'' The Dyers, indeed, gained a Charter of Incorporation in 1471, but the Fullers and the Shearmen not till later.' Meanwhile the Letters Patent of igdj had especially reserved The Three the rights of those who enjoyed the privilege of holding &rs ^'^^^'^ ^^vl%. in the suburbs. The great Fairs were three in number : one at Westminster, belonging to the Abbot ; another at Smithfield, which belonged to the Prior of St. Bartholomew ; the third at Southwark, belonging to the Prior of St. Mary Overy. Of these, the first was the most important and lasted thirty days, while the other two lasted but three. Cloth was sold at aU these feirs, but more especially at that of St. Bartholomew, where the cloth market was entered by the great Cloth Gate. All the Clothiers and Drapers of England attended, as well as others concerned in ^ Strype, Stow, ed. I7yf, p. 339, mentions other cases, but he gives no authority, and as he calls the Taylor a Merchant Taylor, a name by which they were not known till 1J02, his accuracy may be doubted. =" Ordinances, Appendix, vol. i. No. XVII; Accounts, 1413-42, Appendix, vol. i. No. XVIII. ^ Hazlitt, Livery Companies, 112. 34. The Shearmen sheared the fustian and levelled the nap of the cloth. The Fullers worked in the loose fibres of the wool. The Dyers originally dyed the wool and not the cloth, but by this time the process of dyeing and of fulling was often done by the same man. As to the fiiture history of the Fullers and Shearmen, see p. 1 1 9 of this volume. loi History of the Gild ofDrapers the cloth trade, and here the Drapers shared with the Taylors the right to search all cloth exposed for sale, and to mark it according to its width and length, the Drapers using the Drapers' ell or standard, the Taylors their silver yard.^ The fairs, however, lasted only for a short time, and, as the cloth trade increased in the provincial towns of England, the number of country Clothiers and Drapers, as well as of aliens, who wished to sell their cloth in London increased. To meet the difficulty the Mayor, Whityngton, and the commonalty Bakewell of London purchased in 1 3P5^-(5 Bakewell Hall or Blackwellhall, in ^^"- Basinghall Street, once belonging to Sir Richard Clifford " and then to the family of Banquell or Bakewell, from whence it derived its name. The Mayor in the ordinances of I3p8 ordered that to prevent the secret sale of wooUen cloths and disorderly and deceitfiil bargains of ' foreign ' Drapers ^ in divers hostelries, aUsuch should sell their cloths at Bakewell Hall only, and at fixed days and hours in the week, on pain of forfeiture ; that no Merchant Stranger should sell to Merchant Stranger, and that the cloth so sold should be cloths and half cloths listed at both ends.'* The Statute s Henry IV (1403) further enacted that Merchant Strangers should expend the proceeds of their sales ' Cf. Herbert, i. 47, 427. For the later quarrel of Drapers and Taylors over the right of search, cf. p. 116 of this volume. " Not to the Basings as Stow says. Sir Roger de Clifford sold Bakewelhall to the City in 1180. Cf. Memorandum to Ordinances of 1405 ; Letter Book A, fo. 13?, p. 2Z7 note; Wardens' Accounts, if 21-1, fo. 2b; Rep. 7, 197. In 1286 and 1293 the City transferred it to John de Banquell and repurchased it in 1395-^. Cf. Stow, ed. Kingsford, i. z%6, 288, 290, ii. 33^. The position of the Hall in Basinghall Street may be seen in Mr. Kingsford's Map. It is now the site of the Law Courts. ' By foreign is meant Englishmen not resident in London. Aliens could not purchase at the Hall, nor of any one except a citizen of London. Cf. ' Memoire du traitement des Fran9oys', Schanz, Handelspolitik, ii. 525. "* Riley, Memorials, p. jjo, quoting Letter Book H, fo. 327. Cf also Ordinancesof 1 40 f, Appendix, vol. i, No. XVII. In Letter Book K, fo. 2jjb,there is an interesting petition of date 145 1 which complains of secret sale of woollen cloths, leather, and other goods ' between foreign and foreign to the great deroga- c'on and prejudice ot the franchise of the City and the grete hurte of the trewe franchised people of the same City '. The lieges of the King, merchants of Guyenne, were, however, allowed to sell to each other. Cf. Ordinances of 140J. from 1364 to 1479 103 on commodities of the realm, the lieges of Guyenne alone excepted ; a statute which was enforced by the Mayor on the petition of the Drapers.' To carry out these ordinances a Keeper was appointed, to whom an oath was administered that he would duly observe them.'' In 1404 the Drapers were conciliated by being allowed to appoint the Keeper, though he was to be admitted, and could be dismissed, by the Mayor and Aldermen, while the Drapers were made responsible ror any damage to the Hall by fire.^ Attempts were evidently made to stop all sale by wholesale by 'foreigners' (i.e. any but citizens) except at the Hall, but the Act of 7 Henry IV, c. p (1405-), as before stated, confirmed the right of Country Drapers and sellers of cloth to sell their wares wholesale not- withstanding any franchises, and declared in its preamble that this had always been allowed.* Shortly after the Drapers had secured the royal confirmation of The Drapers their Mystery, the City of London was convulsed by the social, and the religious, and political upheaval which began with the Good "^"^^"^^'^ Parliament of 1375 and ended with the fall of Richard II. We ^ have already dealt with this episode in the Introduction.^ Whether the Drapers took part in the actual struggle concerning John of Northampton in their corporate capacity, or only as individuals, ' Letter Book I, fos. 30, 37 b, 39 b, 40, f 7-9 b. = Herbert, L 411 ; Letter BookD, fo. 87 b ; Ordinances of 1405, Appendix, vol. i, No. XVII, p. 359 of this volume. ^ Letter Book I, fo. 39b ; Ordinances of 140J, p. zJ9 of this volume. The Master of the Mistery of Drapers to elect an able, wise and sufficient person to see that all kinds of woollen cloth brought to Bakewellhall by Merchant Strangers be sold as by Law. The office of Keeper was an honourable and remunerative one. In 1471 Rich. Norman granted a house called the Gote in Chepe, the rent of which, if 10, was to furnish a salary for the Keeper. To this Olney added another tenement carrying a rent of £6, on condition that he should succeed Norman. Norman also bequeathed plate and jewels worth :f 40 to the Keeper. 403, fo. I a, A. viii. 337. Again, in 1493 Maister Isaac, Alderman and five times Master (1488-9, 1491-3, 1497-8, ijoo-i, ijio-ii), pays iio for rent of Blackwellhall, and in ijoj-6 Maister Calley (Galley) gives 200 marks (£133 6s. %d.) for the office. 403, fo. J7 a, 80 a. * Herbert, i. 397. See also Writ to Mayor and Sheriffs, 1429, to allow Clothworkers (oferarii pannorum) from foreign parts to enjoy their liberties as they have been accustomed, under their Charter, Letter Book K, fo. ^4 b. 5 Cf. p. 30 ff. Fortunes of the Drapers during the reigns of Richard II and Henry IV. Internal Condition of the Drapers* Gild or Fra- ternity at the begin- ning of the fifteenth century. T04- History of the Gild of Drapers we have no positive evidence to show. Besides John of Northampton only one other Draper, William Essex, is men- tioned, but an interesting petition from the Mystery of Drapers of the year 1387 against the election of Nicholas Brembre, as Mayor in 1 3 84, which has been discovered at the Record Office, looks as if they acted as a body, and conclusively proves at least that the Drapers were jealous of the victualling Gilds.' During the reigns of Richard II and Henry IV the Drapers share the fortunes of the Greater Livery Companies, amongst whom they are now taking their place, and are gaining a part in the control of the municipal government. All this has been treated of in the Introductory Chapter.'' Meanwhile, the impor- tance of the cloth trade, both for home consumption and for foreign export, was increasing, and with it the influence of the Drapers. We are not therefore surprised to find that between the accession of Henry IV and the year 1438, the date of their second Charter, six Drapers held the position of Mayor, of whom three had been Sheriffs and three had represented the City in Parliament. Besides these there were sixteen more Drapers who were either Sheriffs, Aldermen, or Members of Parliament.^ This notable rise in the influence of the Drapers on the Municipal Government of London was continued after that date, and was not confined to the political sphere. Indeed the fifteenth century may be said to have been the hey-day of the Gild as a controlling force on the cloth trade within the City. It is therefore most fortunate that with the opening of the fifteenth century we at last reach some definite evidence with regard to the internal condition of the Fraternity. This is found in the ordi- nances of 140^ and 1418, and in the earliest Wardens' Accounts that have been preserved. The accounts, which deal with ten years between 141 3-14 and i44i-z, are, however, only fragmentary.* ' Cf Appendix, vol. i. No. VII. =" Cf. Introduction. ' Cf. Lists of Mayors, Sheriffs, Aldermen, and M.P.'s who were Drapers. Appendix, vol. ii. No. XXXI (j). * They exist for the years 1413-14 to 142^-^5 1428-9 to 1429-30 ; 1433-4 to 1434-J ; 1439-40 to 1441-2. The accounts are printed fully, as well as a description and abstract of the ordinances, in Appendices, vol. i, Nos. XVII and XVIII. The ordinances should be compared with those of the religious brother- hood of 137 1, Appendix, vol. i. No. IV. from 1364 /^. iiij-. iirf. Item for the facion and geldyng of xxiiii peces, that is to %vj viii scocheons, viii assumpcions and viii Reosis. Summa xlviiir. Item for setting on of the same uppon the garlands ii tymys ii/.' 403, fo. 20 a. Garlands or circlets are still worn by the Master as well as the Wardens at the elections. They are now of red velvet, with badges of the Company's arms, the fleur-de-lis, and the Rose enamelled on metal. It is not known how old these existing garlands are, but we know that in 1569-70 the original garlands were altered to the present pattern. Wardens' Accounts, 1569-70, No. 176, fo. 9 a. Illustrations of the garlands of the Grocers may be found in Heath. ° Thus in 1483-4 'John Wodechirch pays {,6 13J. 4vark and at St. Bartholomew's, and on other occasions ; election dinners and the Mayor's Mess ; payments to the Chaplains and the Bedell ; pensions to the almsmen ; mending of the plate and other property at the Hall ; expenses incurred in lawsuits and other matters concerning the Company's interests, and costs of repairing the City wall. There were four keys of the Wardens' Box, two of which were in the hands of the Master for the time being, and the other two in the keeping of two of the Wardens." ' 403, fos. 27 a, 57 a, ^3 a, 6j a. " 403, fo. 52 a. There were also three keys of the plate, one in the hands of Fellowship of Drapers 3 1441-15-09 iss The Renters' Accounts were kept in a separate box, and con- The tained the receipts of the ' ly vehode ', i. e. of the rents derived Renters' from the property of the Company.' Accounts. Their disbursements consisted of quit-rents for lands or houses rented by the Company ; building and reparations ; allowances to tenants; expenses of obits and some salaries. Any deficit in the Renters' accounts was made good by the Wardens, and the balance, if any, of the Renters' Accounts was, after 1494, paid to the Wardens at the annual audit," The balance on the Wardens' Accounts was usually handed on to the incoming Wardens, but occasionally was kept back owing to arrears in payments. The four Wardens and the Renters presented their accounts for Auditing of the past year a short time before the day of election, the accounts Accounts, having been previously submitted to auditors, who are first men- tioned in 14.^5. For the auditing, which was done in a separate ' Chekker Chamber ', counters were apparently used, as was the old practice in the Royal Exchequer.^ From the accounts of the Wardens and the Renters we are Financial able to judge of the financial position of the Craft. In the year Position. 144.1-i their rents, paid by ten tenants, had amounted to £1.^ IS. 4 in foolscap unbound. 43rapers in the Thirteenth Century 183 William Ashwy or Eswy. Alderman of Coleman Street, 11+4.; Sheriff, ia5'4.-5', iaj(f— 7. Collections of a London Citizen, cd. Gairdner, 1 87(j, pp. 14.7-8 ; Beaven, Aldermen of London, vol, i, p. j jr. According to Gairdner, a Draper; according to Beaven, a Mercer, William Fitz Richards, Sheriff, izyo-i ; Mayor, iif^-lfo, ixd'o-i (according to best authorities). Letter Book F, fo. xj^ ; Beaven, p. 34.1 ; Fabyan, ed. Ellis, i8ii,p, 3(^1 ; Stow, Survey of London, ed, Kingsford, ii. i5(f, 15-7, Ivo de Linge, iz^:^. Fitz Thedmar, Chronicles of Mayors and Sheriffs in Lib, de Antiq. Legibus, Camden Society, p. no; Riley, Chronicles of London, p. 1x5", Robertus Barnard, ii5'5. Fitz Thedmar, Chronicles of Mayors and Sheriffs in Lib. de Antiq. Legibus, Camden Society, p. izo; Riley, Chronicles of London, p. i%<^. Edward le Blund, Alderman of Bassishaw, I^(f(f, ii/i ; Sheriff, 1x6^—6. Beaven, p. 374.; Letter Book F, fo. 231 b, Gervase le Draper. Some date at close of reign of Henry IIL Hist. MSS. Com., Rep. V. jyp, quoted by Ashley, Economic Hist., II. iii. Z45). Peter de Edelmeton. Alderman of Castle Baynard, 1172-80. Beaven, pp. 88, 37f ; Letter Book B, fos. 31, loi b j C, fo. 88. Copyn de Troys, ii'j'^. Letter Book A, fos. a b, 8 b. Joseph le Acatur, ix7f-(f. Member of Parliament, 1283 or 1284.; Alderman of Bridge Ward, 1283—5)0. Letter Book A, fos. i, 24. b, 44 b; Beaven, pp. ff, 26'3, 37(J. Roger Beyvin, draper, 1276^. Letter Book A, fo. 4. William de Bosco, i27(J. Letter Book A, fo. y b, (> b ; Patent Rolls, I225--32, p. 234. William Bukerel. Alderman of Broad Street, i27<)-8. Patent Rolls, 1273, pp. 25:, x6 ; Beaven, pp. 70, 375 ; Letter Book A, fos. 2, 13. William Viel, i27, p. iia; 1311, PP- J", 3<>o; 13x3, p. 15)3 j Letter Book C, fo. 7*? b^ Beaven, Aldermen of London, vol. i, p. 380; Catalogue Drapers' Company, vol. ii, S. Laurence Pounthey. Richard de Gloucestre. Alderman of Bassishaw, ii95'-i30i ; Alder- man of Cornhill, ijoi-x^; SheriiF, 1x5)4-5'. Letter Book B, fo. ^jbj F, fo. a3x ; D, fo. 1x3 b ; Beaven, p. 378. John Cole, 1300. Calendar of Wills, i. 15-^; Letter Book B, fo. 43. Walter de Cantebrige, 1300. Letter Book B, fo. 46^. Elias Russell, 13 01. Letter Book C, fo. (fxb j Beaven, p. xz. John le Blund. Alderman of Cheap Ward, 1x5)8-1309-; Mayor, 1 301-8. Letter Book C, fos. 37 b, 5-7 b, 71 b, 73, 83, 8p, 5»4b j Beaven, p. 95). Walter Swan, 13 01. Letter Book B, fb. 49 b. Matthew de Christchirche, 1301. Letter Book B, fb. 4*?. John de Armentiers, Alderman of Langbourn, I300-(J'. Letter Book C, fo. 76^ b; Beaven, pp. \66, 379. Roger de Lincoln, 1303. Letter Book C, fo. 8xb. Gregory le Bokeler, 1303. Letter Book C, fo. 8x b. Peter le Rey, 1303. Letter Book C, fo. 8x b. Thomas de Kidemenstre, 1304. Letter Book B, fo. ^4b. Ralph de Abenhale, 1304. Letter Book B, fo. ^4. Richard de Wyrhale. Alderman of Aldersgate, i305'-i(). Beaven, Aldermen, p. 379. Ralph the Tailor, 1305. Letter Book C, fo. 88, Peter de Edelmetone, 1305:. Letter Book C, fo. 88. Walter de Harlested, 1305'. Letter Book C, fo! 1x7 b. John Bonde, 13 of. Letter Book C, fo. 1x7 b. Mark de Christchurch, 1305^. Letter Book C, fo. 1x7 b. William de Wyndessore, 1305:. Letter Book B, fo. (^7. John le Mire, 1307. Letter Book B, fo. 74. Ralph de Abeale, 1307. Letter Book C, fo. 130b. Henry Nasard, 1308. Alderman of Broad Street, 1318-xo, i3xi-x. Close Rolls, 1308, p. 5-5'7; 1315-, p. 1^4; 1317, p.409; 1318, p.tfif; 13x0, pp. X3f, X5'3, x8i ; i3x(J, p. 5:^4; 1338, p. 4(^4; Letter Book B, fo. 91 ; Beaven, pp. 70, 381. Walter de Saunford, 1309. Letter Book D, fo. 13. John ' of the Nonnes ' de Norhamptone, 1 3 09.' Letter Book D, fo. 1 1 . Robert 'o' the Nonnes % 1309. Letter Book D, fo. 11. Roger Harold, 1309. Letter Book B, fo. 98 b. Richard Ingayn de Hereford, 1309. Letter Book D, fo. 13. James de Coyn, 1309. Letter Book D, fo. 11 b. Reginald de Frowick, 13 10. Letter Book D, fo. lox b. John Adrian, junior, 13 10. Bailiff (in the place of Sheriff). Letter Book D, fo, 135: b. up to the Date of the Charter, 1364 187 William de Paris, 13 lo. Letter Book B, fo. aj. Thomas de Abindone, 13 11. Letter Book B, fo. 19 ; Close Rolls, 1318, p.jpj 1^39, p. 3T- Henry Costentin, 1311. Letter Book D, fo. 123 b. James Le BotiUer. SheriflF, 1308-9, Letter Book D, fo. ^3 ^ F, fo. 231. William de Welleford, 1312. Letter Book D, fo. 66. Hugh Trip, 1312. Letter Book D, fo. 3 y b. Robert Le Tamier de Abyngdone, 1312. Letter Book D, fo. 70. Thomas Le Spicer de Abyngdone, 1312. Letter Book D, fo. 70. John Simeon, 131a. Letter Book E, fo. 4. Stephen de Abyndon, 1312. Sheriff, 1314.-15'; Mayor, 1315; Alder- man ofDowgate, 1311-21 j Member of Parliament, 13 13, 1318, 1330; Coroner, King's Butler, Chamberlain. Letter Book D, fo. 4.J E, fo. 4.3 ; Beaven, pp. zd^j, ■2.6^, 380; Close Rolls, 1304, p. 143. Simon de Abyndon. Member of Parliament, 131^; Alderman of Broad Street, 1116-1%; Alderman of the Tower, 1318-12; Sheriff, 1319-20. Letter Book D, fo. 5" b ; E, fo.9b; Close Rolls, 13 18, p. 5-5:2; Beaven, vol. i, pp. 70, 197, ■2.6^ 381. Ralph de Walcote. Member of Parliament, i'^\6. Close Rolls, 1318, p. ^5-2; Beaven, Aldermen, p. 2(^4. Henry de Stowe, 13 17. Letter Book £, fo. 93 ; Close Rolls, 1337, p. 138; Stow, Survey, ed. Kingsford, i. 237. William de Winton, 13 18. Record Office, 1|4; Subsidy Roll, 13 18-19. John de Pulteney. Sheriff, 13 18-19; Alderman of Coleman Street, 1327-34; of Candlewick Street, 1334-5'; of Vintry, 133(^-8; Mayor, November 1 3 3 o to November 1 3 3 1 , November 1 3 3 1 to November 1332, November 1333 to November 1334, November 1-^16 to November 1337 ; Knighted, 1337. For his life cf. text, p. 8 8 . Beaven, Aldermen, pp. 80, 205:, 383 ; Letter Book E, fos. 4, lod b, 233 ; F, fos. 32 b, 34, 61 note, 132b, 232b; CloseRoUs,i334,p.2y(J; 1337,?. 24; 1338, pp. 2^4,46^4, 504-; i335'5 PP- TO5 fi, 104, 307, (J19, d2o; 1340, pp. 41, 55-3, 619, ^20; 1341, p. 288; 1345', pp. doi, 6^28; Patent Rolls, 1332, pp. 338, 34f ; 1337, p. 4i. Letter Book F, fo. i66h. Hugh de Stouwe, 1349. Letter Book F, fos. 166, 166 b. Thomas Pyeke, 1349. Calendar of Letters, p. 41. William de Macchyng, 1345). Calendar of Wills, ii. 5-7. John de Sellyngc, 1349. Letter Book F, fo. iiJf b. Thomas de Kent, 1349. Letter Book F, fo. 175. William de Welde. Alderman of Coleman Street, 1349— ya; Sheriff, 1353-4; Member of Parliament, 1358. Letter Book F, fo. az3 ; G, fo. izb; Beaven, pp. 107, i.6j, 387. John de Essex, 13 50. Letter Book F, fo. 15)3 b ; Calendar of Wills, ii. ^6. John Costantyn. Alderman of Castle Baynard, 1 3451-58. Beaven, pp. 88, 230, 387. Thomas de Uptone, 1351. Letter Book F, fo. 198 b; Patent Rolls, Thomas atte Noket, 13 5-1. Letter Book F, fo. 103 b. William de Aras, 13 5-1. Letter Book F, fo. 104. Richard de Essex, 1351. Calendar of Letters, x^; Calendar of Wills, ii. 30. Roger de Flete^ 1352. Calendar of Letters, p. 31. Simon de Bedyngtone. Member of Parliament, 1351, 1355-, 135-7, 13(^1, 13(^3; Sheriff, i35'9-(Jo. Letter Book F, fo. a33; G, fo. 785 Beaven, 26^7. Walter de Baumbton, 135-3. Letter Book G, fos. (J b, 33; Close Rolls, 1340, p. 6^13. 190 Drapers in the Fourteenth Century William atte Dyk, 135:3. Letter Book G, fo, 11. Richard de Cayendishe, 135-3. Letter Book G, fo. ii. Thomas Motte, i35'4.. Calendar of Close Rolls, i-^<^j^6o, p. 60. Richard Dyk, 1 3 5-4.. Letter Book G, fo» %% b. Andrew Godyn, 135:6'. Letter Book G, fo. 5:8 b. Hugh de Bermoundeseye, I35:(j. Letter Book F, fo. xj. Nicholas Rous, 1357. Calendar of Close Rolls, i35'-f-6o, p. ^z<;. John Penne, 1357. Calendar of Letters, p. t)i. Henry Welwes, 13 5- 7. Calendar of Letters, p. pi. Richard de Oxon, 13^7. Letter Book F, fo, aixb; Calendar of Wills, ii. f I ; Rymer, Foedera, IIL ii. 678. John Botiller, 135:7-8. Letter Book F, fo. azib^ Calendar of Wills, ii. 5:1. Stephen Caundysshe. Sheriff, 1357-8; Alderman of Bread Street, 1 3 5- 8; Member of Parliament, 13 60; Mayor, 1361-3. Letter Book F, fos. 1 70, XZ2 b, 23 3 ; Beaven, vol. i, pp, 46, x6-j ; Patent Rolls, 3 5:4.. Henry Galeys, 1358. Letter Book G, fo. 68 ; Close Rolls, 1341, p. 5'64, John Bures. Sheriff", 135:8-9. Letter Book F, fo. 233; G, fo. 69; Calendar of Letters, p. ■2.^; Close Rolls, 134.5:, p. 5:75:; iJTi?, P* 6^1 ■, Patent Rolls, 1342., p. 55:4.. Adam de Seint Ive, I35'p. Letter Book G, fo. 79 b. Thomas de Cavendish, 135:9. Letter Book F, fo. 33 ; G, fo. 83, William de Oysterle, 1 360. Calendar of Close Rolls, 1 360-4., p. 115:. John Utlicote, 1361. Calendar of Wills, ii. 5:8. Richard Atte Moure, 1361. Calendar of Wills, ii. x6. Philip de Irlaund, 1361. Calendar of Close Rolls, 1360-.4, p. z8x. Robert de Guldeford, 1361. Letter Book G, fo. 97 b. John Cory, 1361. Calendar of Wills, ii. 5'i. James Andrew. Sheriff, 1362-3; Alderman of Bassishaw, 1363. Letter Book F, fos. 172, 186, 233 ; Close Rolls, 1338, pp. 4.24,4.31; 134-0, pp. T34> f 38 ; Beaven, pp. 16, 389. John Chaumpeneys, 1362. Calendar of Close Rolls, 136^0-4, p. 396. John Bonmarche, 1363. Letter Book G, fo. nob. John Burgeys, 1363. Letter Book G, fo. nob; Close Rolls, 1338, pp. 424, 432; 1335), pp. 50, 307. William de Draycote, 1363. Letter Book G, fo. nob. Thomas de Swafham, 1364. Letter Book G, fo. 137 b. John Fyshe, 1364. Letter Book G, fos. 138 b, i3(>. Walter de Iweyn, 1364. Letter Book G, fo. 137 b. Richard de Claveryng, 1364. Letter Book G, fo. 137 b. Functions of Drapers 191 IIIb EVIDENCES AS TO THE FUNCTIONS OF DRAPERS IN THE FOURTEENTH CENTURY UP TO THE DATE OF THE FIRST CHARTER, i^^T^ (i) Drapers. Buying luool. We hear of wool of Oxfordshire, Cotswold, Berkshire, Boston. Of bad luooly Peltewolle, LambwoUe, Cobbewool, Malemort. Patent Rolls, 1 341, pp. 2.12, 3 (Jo, 45-3. 1305. Will, de Wyndesore buys wool of woolmen. Letter Book B, fo. (fy. 1308. H. Nazard owes Hugh le Despenser £io, probably for wool. Close Rolls, 1308, p. 5-57. 1318. H. Nazard, Thos. Cok, and others, owe Earl of Arundel £,';66 13X. 4//., probably for wool, since in 1338 we find the Earl lending wool to the King. Qose Rolls, i3i8,p. di^: ; 1338, p. 4.(^4.. 13*0. Thos. Cok owed 100 sacks of wool (worth i,ioo marks) by lohn. Abbot of Abingdon. Close Rolls, 1320, p. 228. 1323. John de Lincoln owes King money for wool from Manors formerly belonging to the Knights Templars. Close Rolls, 1323, p. 193. 1327. H. Darcy owes Abbot of Netley ^100, probably for wool. Close Rolls, 1327, p. 57 f. 1339. John de Northbury buys wool from John Pulteney. Close Rolls, 1335), p. 5 1. 134.5'. John Bures owes Prior of St. Mary's, Southwark, ^22, probably for wool. Calendar of Close Rolls, 1345', p. 5'7y. 1346^. Thomas Swanlond and others owe Earl of Arundel ^1,198 13^. 4//., probably for wool. Close Rolls, 134^, p. 170. Also the Abbot of Canterbury, ^8co, p. 174^ the Earl of Suffolk, ^300, p. 40^; Walter de Many, ^3,000, p. 41^. 1348. Thomas de Swanlond, draper, buys wool. Accused, together with others, of oppressions in collecting of wool and increment of same. Patent Rolls, 1348, p. 104. 1348. Thomas Swanlond and Richard de Berkyng owe the Prior of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem ^410, probably for wool. Close Rolls, 1348, p. . 1334. John de Pulteney exports 58 sacks and 21 cloves ot wool from London. Close Rolls, 13 34, p. xfif. 1337. John de Weston exports wools, hides, wooltells. Close Rolls, 1335-, p. 484, 1338. John, de Pulteney sells wool to the King, and sends it across the sea for the King's use. Close Rolls, 1338, pp. 4(^4, 504. 1338. James Andrew, Maurice Turgys, John Burgeys, and John de Kesyngbery, export wool to Holland and Seland. Close Rolls, 1338, pp. 424, 43 z. 1335). John de Pulteney and John Burgeys sell wool to one, who sends it across the sea for the King's use. Close Rolls, 1339, pp. fo, 307. Pulteney is also owed £3,000 by a merchant of the Society of Peruzzi and others, probably for wool. Ibid,, p. 104. 1335). John Bures exports wool to Antwerp. Close Rolls, 1339, p. 7. 1340, John de Pulteney exports wool to Bruges. Close Rolls, 1340, p. 41. 1342. Henry Galeys, as attorney for Robert of Artois, is allowed to use the King's Right of Pre-emption in Suffolk, and to buy wool at 6 marks the sack, and export to Flanders, paying only | a mark customs, because R, de Artois was about to set out to Brittany at King's wages with troops. Close Rolls, 1 342, p, 'j6^. (3) Drapers acting as Collectors of Customs on tuoolj -woolfellsy and hides. "Drapers in the Fourteenth Century 193 ijii. John de Lincoln. Close Rolls, ijii, pp. jxi, 390. 131^. H. Nazard in port of London. Ibid., i?i5', p. i(J+. I ja^. John Pulteney Warden for the City at Winchester Fair. 1334. Ralph de Weston and Rich, de Berkyng appointed attorneys of the City at Winchester Fair. Letter Book E, p. %i^. 1339-40. Thos. Swanlond in port of London. Close Rolls, 1339, p. 198; 1340, p. 5'oi. Thomas de Abyngdon at Southampton to see that all the King's wool is sent thence to Antwerp. Ibid., 1339, p. 35. 1339. Thomas de Upton appointed to be controller of customs of wines, wools, hides, and woolfells in Caernarvon. PatentRolls, 1 3 39,p. 32.*. 1341. John de Northburgh, with others, to hasten the collection, and supervise the quality of the 173^ sacks out of the 30,000 sacks of wool assigned by the King to Master Paul de Monte Florum. Patent Rolls, 1 34a, p. 480. 1341. John de Bures, associated with others, to hear and determine complaints against the collectors and receivers of wool granted to the King in Surrey. Patent Rolls, 1 341, p. 5:44. 1348. Thomas de Swanland. One of those to whom the King has committed the custody of aU customs and subsidies in England for a time, excepting wine. Patent Rolls, 1348, pp. 50, ^^y 145-. Richard de Oxenford. Farms the subsidy due to the King in return for remission of fine and forfeitures of cloth under the aulnage. Rymer, Foedera, III, pars, ii, p. ^78. (4) Drapers lending money to the King. There are many instances of this, but the following are the most interesting : 1309. John de Lincoln, and others, to be paid ^ifx 19J. out of customs on wool, woolfells, and hides, for money lent to the late King for his French wars. Close Rolls, 1309, p. ua. 1318. Henry Darcy lends the King ^9 6s. %d. on wool. Close Rolls, 1318, p. 3x8. In 1 3 3x John de Pulteney and Geoffrey Le Botiller are assigned ^1,518 ^s. xd. on the customs at the ports of Southampton and London, in return for money paid by them to certain merchants of Aquitaine, creditors of the King. Patent Rolls, 133a, pp. 338, 345-. In 1340 Will, de La Pole had lent large sums to the King. In return the King makes large grants of wool ; and whereas Pulteney has paid the merchants, to whom Pole is in debt, Pulteney is allowed to have ' a leaf of the court ' at various ports ; which means that Pulteney can export wool, &c., without paying customs. Close Rolls, 1340, pp. ^19-20; 1336^. Rich. Constantyn and Rich. Kyselyngbery lend 60s. each, for ships sent to sea. Letter Book F, fo. 3. 1603-1 C C 194 Evidences as to the Functions of In February 133(^-7 12, Drapers lend ^fjo between them to the King, the Queen, and other magnates. H. Darci, Hugh Le Maberer, ^5' each ; Hugh de Dedham, Thomas de Swanlonde, £1 each ; Rich. Constantyn, Ric. de Berkynge, Ric. de Welleford, Maurice Turgys, John de Keselyngbury, {% each ; Ralph de Upton, John Someresham, ^i \os. each; GeoflFrey Le Botiller, £1. Letter Book F, fo. 4.b. 1337. Orders to collectors of the New Custom in the City to pay aoo marks to John de Pulteneye, as the King is bound to him in 100 marks, which he paid to G. de Say, admiral of the King's fleet, and also 100 marks which he delivered to the King. Close Rolls, 1337, p. i.if. March 1339-4.0. The following 18 Drapers contribute to a loan of iCfjOoo j P^rt of it being paid to James de Arteveldt, the Flemish burgher, and ally of Edward III : Thomas de Cavendish, {^%o ; Ralph de Upton, £ip-^ H. Darci, ^40; John Lovekyn, ^30; Rich, de Kyselyngbury, ^fzf j John Peche and his partner, j^if ; Rich, de Berk- ynge, ^lo ; Hugh Le Marbrer, {p.o ; Rich. Costantyn, John de Kyselyngbery, Thomas de Northampton, John de Weston, Maurice de Turgeys, ^10 each; Walter de Bampton, John Kelyngworth, Geoflfirey Le Botiller, John Levelif, Thomas de Canterbury, ^f y each. Letter Book F, fos. 33, 33 b. 1 34.0. The pre-emption of ao,ooo sacks of wool having been granted to Edward III, he sells it to James Andrew and others not Drapers. They undertake to pay part of the purchase money to the King's wardrobe beyond the sea. Close Rolls, 1340, pp. 5'34., 538. 134.1. Order to Sheriff of Norfolk to pay John de Pulteneye 1,000 marks, in part satisfaction of ^1,100, which John lately paid for the King at his request to certain merchants of London, who lent an equal sum to the King in parts beyond the sea. Close Rolls, 134.1, p. x88. Order to the same SheriiFto pay another 1,000 marks to Pulteneye, which he promises to pay to the Bardi and Peruzzi creditors of the King. Ibid., p. 194.. 134.5. Thomas Swanlond and J, Pulteney are granted the 3*/. out of the customs in return for a loan. Close Rolls, 134.5:, pp. 5oi, 6t.%. 1350. Thomas de Swanlond, and others, allowed i mark out of the customs due by them, in return for ^zo,ooo lent by them to the King. Close Rolls, 1350, p. 15-9. 1 3 50. Lands of Thomas de Swanlond and of others seized for great sums due to the King ; as well of the time when they were farmers of his customs as for other causes. N.B. Swanlond and others had received the ' Great Crown' in pledge for ^4.,ooo. Patent Rolls, 135:0, p. 5'4.8. 135:1. Swanlond is detained in prison for money owed the King. Drapers in the Fourteenth Century ipf His licence to go to divers parts for evidences relating to this, and to recover money due to him. Patent Rolls, 13^1, p. 98. (5-) Drapers importing cloth. 1304. Stephen de Abyngdon buys cloth and other necessaries worth j(|i,ioc at Antwerp and Malines, for the King's Wardrobe. Close Rolls, 1304., p. 143. 1338. Thomas Blakeney lades 'La Paternoster', of London, with salt, wine, and cloth, in Normandy for England. Close Rolls, 1338, P- +Tf. 13^8. John De Bures allowed to import a bale of striped cloths of Ghent, which the servants of John Bures had bought in Flanders. Ibid., 13^8, p, 410. (d) 'Drapers buying and selling cloth and other articles. There are many instances of Drapers being owed large sums of money by influential persons, which was probably for cloth, and of selling doth to the King's Wardrobe. 1315:. Simon de Swanlond buys cloth at Boston Fair and elsewhere. Close Rolls, 1 3 If, pp. 170, 496^. 13x0. H. Nazard sells cloth to King's Wardrobe, to the Queen, and for men-at-arms at garrisons of King's Castles in Scotland. Close Rolls, i3ao, p. x8i. 1327. Simon de Swanlond owed ^300 for cloth, and Simon de Abingdon xf marks for cloth, by the King. CloseRolls, 1327, pp. 85:, 192. 1328. Richard de Welleford and Geof&ey de Weston are robbed near Stowe of cloth of various colours, coverlets, dorsers, canvas, and other chattels value ^^130. Close Rolls, 1328, p. 302. I33(f. Ralph de Upton sells cloth (^i% ^s. \d.) to the King. Close Rolls, 1335, p. 5^4. 1337. John de Pultney is assigned ^60 lys. zd. for cloth and horse- shoes bought by the King's order for the Earl of Salisbury. Also is paid other sums for various articles, as cups, ewer, and palfreys. Patent Rolls, 1337, p. 41 lui ne p< autre p nulle man© de couine forsqj vne soulement quel il vorroit elire deuant la feste de la Chandeleure darrein passe grceux qauoient entre- meins autres marchandises q celles qils issint esliroient les porroient mettre a vente deuant la feste del Natiuite de Seint Johan le Baptistre pchein ensuant come en les dites ordenances est contenuz plus au plein Et ia soit monstre a nous ^ a lire conseil q p' cause q, gentz de diQses mestiers qonqes nestoient app)ntices ne sufficiantment apris en le mestier de marchandie de draperie solonc les bones aunciens vsages de la Citee de Londres se mellent du dit mestier si qja peine home troSa shope en la dite Citee Edward, by Grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland and of Aquitaine, to all to whom these present Letters shall come, greet- ing. Know that whereas amongst other matters ordained at our last Parliament it was for certain reasons in the said Parliament or- dained * that no English merchant should use no ware nor merchandise by himself, or another by any man- ner of covine [fraud], except that one only, which he had chosen before the Feast of Candlemas last past, and that those who had en- gaged in merchandise other than that they then chose could put them to sale before the Feast of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist next ensuing, as in the said ordi- nances is more fully contained. And now it has been shown to us and our Council that because people of divers mysteries, whohave neither been apprenticed to, nor sufficiently instructed in, the mys- tery of the dealing in Drapery according to the good ancient usages of the City of London, engage in the said mystery, one can scarcely find any shop in the ' The copy in the Company's Book of Evidences, + 589, fo. I5'4, is here and there illegible. It is preceded by the following note : ' Ista Carta am Regis lecta & irrotulata q sunt in Cain)a gyhalde London in libro cum tra G, fo. cxxii. tempe Ade de Bary maioris & loftis de Cauntebrugg came? videlt anno Regis Edwardi tercii pos conqm tricesimo octavo.' — Lucas. The copy in Herbert, i. 480, taken from the recital in the mandate commanding its publication differs in the wording. =37 Ed. ftlj c. j. Letters Tatent of i% Edward III lof daucune mestier en quele ne soit aucun draperie ou meins ou plus mis ^ monstre a coe vente queux gentz nount souffisante conissance en le pris de darrees de marchandie du mestier de draperie ^ p lour nounsachantie ^ auxint p les grosses embracementz qils fount meins sagement de totes maneres de draps si est la chierte de draperie deuenuz si gnt qele ne purra legerement estre amenuse ^ auxint pluseurs deceites sont faites en la fesance ^ vente de draps come p fauses moillieurs (J toundours (J drap de demy grein vendu pur escarlet et les Teinturers Tistrers Q: Fullers q soleient assi- duelement faire lour labour f)pre sont deuenuz fesours de draps (J ne voillent laborer sur le drap dautri sil ne soit p' trop excessiue salarie ^ nientmeins fount plusures fraudes en lour oQaignes queux ne poent bien estre appceus sinoun p drapers soulement qont de tiels oQaignes pleSe conissance Q; q pys est souent les teinturers chaungeont les leines les Tisters la file ^ les Fullers tout le drap queux Teinturers Tistours (J Fullers auxint p colour qils sont fesours des draps achatent autri draps p voie de forstallarie (| puis les vendent as drapers ^ issint est le drap deux foitz achate auant qil viegne a comune vente (J le drap qest si souent achate (J vendue p said City of any mystery in which there is not some drapery more or less offered for common sale, which people have not sufficient know- ledge of the price of goods belong, ing to the merchandise of the Mys- tery of Drapery (the selling price of Drapery). And on account of their ignorance, and because of the great (embracementz) engrossment which they make unwisely of all manner of cloth, the dearness of cloth has become so great that it cannot be easily reduced, and also various frauds have been practised iii the making and sale of cloth, such as by false dampers ' and shearmen, and cloth of demy grein sold for scarlet; and the Dyers, Weavers, and Fullers, who should confine themselves to their own proper work, have become makers of cloths, and will not work on the cloths of others except at an exces- sive wage, and also perpetrate many frauds in their work which cannot be well detected except by Drapers who have full knowledge of such work, and what is worse, the Dyers often change the wool and the Weavers the yarn, and the Fullers the whole cloth, the which Dyers, Weavers and Fullers also, on the ground that they are makers of clothj, buy other cloths by way of forestalling and then sell them to Drapers, and thus the cloth is twice bought before it comes to open sale, and being thus so often bought and sold by divers hands ' ' Moillienr.' The damping or soaking of the cloth probably in the process of falling or dyeing. Mr. Pirenne tells me that he has never met with the word in French or Low Country documents. io6 Letters Tatent qf^S Edward III diQses mains couient a forte estre de molt le plus chier q drap q nest vendu q vne foitz p Marchant draper queles choses entre autres sont les greindres causes de lex- cessiue chierte de marchandise de draperie Q: issint de tieux deceites Q: defautes t§gnt damage i^ pert sont aduenuz deuant ces heures sibien a nous come a tout le poeple de nre roialme 5 plusgntz auendront q dieu defende si remedie k plustost ny soit mys Nous entendantz les dites choses issint a nous monstretz estre tout contfiantz au dite ordi- nance duplement ^voillantz mesme lordinance garder ^ meintenir en touz pointz (i de tout ouster les fraudes ^ deceites susditz si auons p assent des gntz ^ autres de iire consail ordene 5 gnte q nuUy ne vse le mestier de draperie en la Citee de Londres non les suburbes dycelle sil neist este app)ntice en icelle mestier ou p autre dune manle receu p coe assent de mesme le mestier et q chescun des ditz mestiers des Teinturers Tisters (J Fullers se tiegne a son office ppre ^ de rien ne se melle de fesure achate ne de vente de nul marOe drap ne de draperie sur peine demprisonement 5 de pdre tout le drap issint p eux feit achate ou vendue ou la value deQs nous et q nul q eit drap a vendre en la dite Citee ou en les suburbes ne les vende forsqj as drapers enfranchiez en la dite mestier de drapie sil ne soit en becomes much more dear than cloth which is only sold once by a Merchant Draper. The which things amongst others are the chief cause of the excessive dearness of the merchandise of cloth, and also because of the like frauds and de- faults great damage and loss have of late accrued to us and all the people of our realm, and greater will befall us, which God forbid, if a remedy be not speedily applied. We, understanding that the said things as above shown to us are entirely contrary to the said ordi- nance of Parliament, and wishing to maintain and enforce in all points the said ordinance and to remove the above-mentioned frauds and deceits, have, with the assent of the lords and others of our Council, ordained and granted that none shall use the said Mystery of Drapery in the City of London, norin the suburbsof the same, unless he has been apprenticed in the said Mystery or in other due manner been received by the common as- sent of the same Mystery, and that each of the Mysteries of Dyers, Weavers, and Fullers shall keep themselves to their own Mystery, and in no way meddle with the * making', buying, or selling of any manner of cloth or drapery on pain of imprisonment, and of forfeiture to us of all the cloth so by them made, bought or sold, or of the value thereof. And that no one who has cloths to sell in the said City or in the suburbs shall sell them except to Drapers en- franchised in the said Mystery of Drapery, unless it be in gross to Letters Tatent of i^ Edward III 107 gros as Seign's ^ autres du coe qi les voillent achatre pour lour oeps demesne (i nemie a retaille sur mesme la peine Et q les Drapers enfranchiez en la mestere dedraperie en la dite Citee puissent elire ches- cun an quatre psones de lour mes- tier ppre q soient iurrez vne foitz p an en p)sence du Mair de suruere q nul defaute ne deceite soit vse ne teit en les mestiers auantditz ^ de reuler (J gou)ner le dit mestier de draperie en mesme la Citee au coe ^fit du poeple ^ de due punissement ent faire de ceux en queux defaut §ra troue selonc lauis (J discrecion des ditz quatre psones p laide du Mair ^ des viscontz qnt il embu- soignera les queux Mair (J viscontz nous volons qils soient entendantz as ditz quatre psones qant ils §ront a ce p eux requis. Et volons auxint ^ donons poair as ditz quatre psones qi iront issint eslieux ^ iurrez de p)ndre §ement de toux ceux qi Iront receux au dit mestier de draperie en mesme la Citee de vsir g: faire ce qapptient a mesme le mestier bien ^ loialment sanz fraude mal engin ou subtil compassement faire encontre les pointz (J orde- nances auantditz Sauue touz io's a nre chier en dieu le Priour de Smythfeld ^ autres seign's qont feires en les dites suburbes p gntes de noz pgenito's ^ de nous lour feires franchises 5 franches custumes the lords and others of the com- mons who wish to buy them for their own use, and by no means by retail under the same penalty. And that the Drapers enfranchised in the Mystery of Drapery in the said City may elect each year four of their own Mystery, who shall be sworn once a year ' in the presence of the Mayor, to oversee that no default nor deceit be used or done in the Mystery aforesaid ; and to rule and govern the said Mystery of Drapery in the same City to the common profit of the people, and to duly punish those in whom default shall be found, according to the advice and discretion of the said four persons by the aid of the Mayor and the Sheriflfs if need be • the which Mayor and SheriflFs shall listen to the said four persons when they shall be requested by them. And we also will and give power to the said four persons who shall be elected and sworn, to take an oath of all those who shall be re- ceived into the said Mystery of Drapery in the same City, that they will and do whatever appertains to the same Mystery well and law- fully without fraud, evil design, or subtle compassing contrary to the points and ordinances aforesaid. Saving always to our beloved in God, the Prior of Smithfield, and other lords, who have fairs in the said suburbs by grant of our pro- genitors, or of us, their fairs, fran- chises, and free customs which they '^ In the mandate ordering the publication of the Charter they are to be sworn twice a year. C£ Herbert, Livery Companies, i. 482. io8 Letters Tatent of 1% Edward III queux ils ont vsez en leur ditz feires du temps des dites gates encea as queux p colour de ceste nre gate ^ ordenance nous ne volons pjiudice ne damage estre fait en aucun man)e et sauue les franchises p nous gntez as Marchantz Vineters Dengle^re (J de Gascoigne queux nous volons demorer en lour force en touz pointz En tesmoignaace de quele chose nous avons fait faire cestes noz Ires patentes Doii A Westmoustier le quinzisme iour de luyl Ian de nre regne trent oetisme. p ipm Regem Q: cons. have exercised in their said fairs from the date of the said grants, with regard to whom we do not wish that any prejudice or damage shall be done to them in any way under pretext of this our grant and ordinance} and saving the franchises by us granted to the Merchant Vintners of England and Gascony, which we will shall remain in force in all points. In testimony of which we have caused to be written these our Letters Patent. Given at Westminster the ifth day of July in the 38th year of our reign. By the King and his Council. vn PETITION OF THE MYSTERY OF DRAPERS AGAINST THE ELECTION OF NICHOLAS BREMBRE AS MAYOR IN 138+ Ancient Petitions, File 94, No. 45^4, Public Record Office, London. A ? sexcellent & ? spuissant s' nre s' le Roy & ? snobles & sages s's de cest p)3ent plement . . . . nt hublement ses po9es liges Drapers de sa Citee de Loundres & se pley- nent ^s s Nichol Brembre Chlr & sez acomplices & autres de son assent de ce q le dit s Nichol ove lassent de lez qux fiirent de son assent accrocha s' lui roiale poair de ce q encontre lo' chartre dez Roys g'^unte & conferme de lo' fraunchise de la dite Citee & en mayntenance de sa mondre fist Steins gentz q furent de son assent al Gyhall du dite Citee en To the most Excellent and Puis- sant Lord the King and the very noble and wise lords of the present Parliament their poor lieges the Drapers of the City of London humbly [address themselves] and complain against Sir Nicholas Brembre knight, and his accom- plices and others of his faction, that the said Sir Nicholas,withthe assent of those who were of his faction, accroached to himself the royal power, in that, contrary to the Royal Charters granted and con- firmed concerning their privileges in the said City of London, and Tet'ition against Nicholas Brembre 109 le feste de seint Edward Ian le Roy qorest viij"* pur eslire un mair Et k dit s Nichol p assent z lez autres qux furent de son assent fist crier en di9ses pties du dite Citee & charger chescun home du dite Citee s' peyne denprisonement & s' la peyne de qu'^qils p'oient faire de?s le Roy q nul ne §roit si hardy destre al dite eleccione fors ceux q furent somonez & ceux qi furent somonus furent somonus p lo' assent Et mesme le jour a cele eleccion . . . feust fait encontre lo' fraunchise le dit s Nichol & lez autres de son assent ordeynerent 9teins gentz sibien fbreins come autres a g"unt nombre lez qux fiirent armez al . . . hall de Loundres p' faire cele eleccion p qe pleise a iire dit ? le Roi & lez fenobles & sages s's en ceste p)sent plement de ceste hor- rible chose faite encontre la corone . . . faire due remedy p' Dieu Sic en eovre de charitee Itm lez ditz suppliantz se pley- nent 9s le dit s Nichol de ceo qil ove lassent des autres ses acom- pUces accrocha s' lui Roiale poair en ceo qil venoit en Chepe ove g'^unt mititude dez gentz armez a g'^unt affray & doute de touz bons gentz du dite Citee Et ap)s p' malice prist di?ses gentz du dit mistier & eux mis en p'sone a g^'nt doute de IC vies & pde de lo' biens sanz respouns ou ley Issent qil & lez autres deson assent accrocherent for the maintenance of its citizens, collected certain folk who^were of his party to the Guildhall on the Feast of S. Edward in the 8th year of the King now reigning to elect a Mayor; and the said Sir Nicholas, by consent of those who were of his faction, caused proclamation to be made in various parts of the City, and charged every man of the said City, on pain of imprisonment and of what might happen to them from the King, that no -one should be so daring as to be at the said election except those summoned, and those who were summoned were summoned by their consent. And on the day of election, which was fixed in violation of their [the citizens'] privileges, the said Sir Nicholas and others of his faction ordered to the Guildhall of London certain persons, ' foreigns ' and others in great numbers, who were armed, to make the election. For the which horrid deed done against the Crown may it please the said lord the King and the noble and wise lords in this present Parlia- ment to find a remedy, for the sake of God and as a deed of charity. The said petitioners also com- plain against the said Sir Nicholas that he, with consent of others his accomplices, accroached to himself the Royal authority in that he came into Chepe with a great multitude of armed folk, to the great terror and dismay of all good citizens of the said City, and after ma- liciously seizing several of the said Mystery put them in prison, to the danger of their lives and the loss of their goods, without giving them 1603-1 E e 110 ^Petition of the 'Drapers against the fe^eux Roial poairencontre la corone nre dit s' le Roi q pleise a iire dit fif le Roi & lez s's avant ditz de ceste chose fait encontre la corone & ley de Jre ent faire solonc ce qils ont delvifdieu & eneovre de charitee Itm lez dits suppliantz se pleynent ?s le dit s Nicol de ceo qil ove lassent des autres avantditz de sa covyne accrocha s"^ lui Roiale poair de ceo qils conspirerent & yma- ginerent p» avoir mis a mort pluso'^s bons gentz de Loundres et p^ ce qils ne p*roient faire celle chose sanz ascune cause ils conspirerent de eux enditer de felonie & treson & mistrent s"^ lez enquestes de eux enditer ceux qi fiirent del afSnitee & assent le dit s Nichol & qux iurent de male fame come o?tement §ra |)vez si lez enditemcntz furent devant vous q pleise a iire dit s"^ le Roi & lez s's avantditz de ceste horrible Jtnatiere ent faire due re- medie & charger Nichol Extoii ore Meir de Loundres de faire venir devant vous touz lez enditementz ove lez enditots qux sont en sa garde en avauntage du Roy p' Dieu & en eovre de charitee Km lez ditz suppliantz se pley- nent ?s le dit s Nichol & ses acom- plices q come estatut fuit fait au plement tenuz a Westm Ian du regne iire dit s le Roi sisme q comence en cestes ^oles any right of answering or of Law. Inasmuch then as he and those of his party accroached to them- selves the Royal authority against the Crown of our said lord the King, may it please the said lord our King and the aforesaid lords to do to them for this act against the Crown and the Law of the Land as they deserve, for God's sake and as a deed of charity. Also the said petitioners com- plain against the said Sir Nicholas that he, with the consent of the aforesaid persons of his faction, accroached to himself the Royal power by conspiring and imagining the death of several good men of London ; and because they could not do this without any reason, they conspired to indite them of felony and treason, and placed on the panel of those who accused them men who were connected with and of the party of the said Sir Nicholas, and who were of evil fame, as can be openly proved if the indictments were before you. May it therefore please our lord the King and the above-mentioned lords to give remedy for this hor- rible affair, and to charge Nicholas Exton, our Mayor of London, to cause all the indictments and the accusers who are in his hands to be brought before you, to the ad- vantage of the King, for God's sake and as an act of charity. Also the said petitioners com- plain against the said Sir Nicholas and his accomplices that, whereas a Statute was made at the Parliament held at Westminster in the tfth year of the said our lord the King Election of Nicholas Bremhre as Mayor xii Itm ordiatu est & statutu qd nee in civitate London nee in aliis civitatibus burgis villis vel portubz maris p totu regnu pdcm aliquis vitallarius ofSciu judiciale dece?o Beat d^ceat neqj occupet quovis- modo in villis ubi alia psona suf- ficiens ad huj' statu Rend repiri non pofet du tamen idem Judex p tempe quo in officio illo ste?it ab e2cicio vitallaf sub pena forisfactuf victua- liu suoijL sic venditoif peni? cesset & se abstineat j> se & suis [w] omlno ab eod lui quel s Nichol & ses acomplices lestatut avantdit ont confriez a g^'unde damage de touz les Comes du dite Citee q pleise a nre dit s' le Roi & les s's avant- ditz g^'unter q le dit estatut soit tenuz sibn en la dite Citee come aillo's & mayntenant mis en exccu- cioun nient encontre esteant ascun estatut ou ordinance fait en le countr depuis encea. which begins with these words : ' Also it is ordained and established that neither in the City of Lon- don, nor in any other cities, bor- oughs, towns, or sea-ports through- out the realm aforesaid shall any victualler have exercise or in any wise occupy any judicial office, except in such towns where no other person sufficient to have the office may be found j in the which case the judge during the time that he shall continue in the same office shall utterly omit and abstain him- self and his from the exercise ot victualling upon pain of forfeiture of his victuals so sold ' — the which Statute the said Sir Nicholas and his accomplices have disobeyed, to the great damage of all the commonalty of this City. May it therefore please our said lord the King and the lords aforesaid to grant that this Statute be eufbrced, as well in the City as elsewhere, and forthwith be put into execution, notwith- standing any Statute or ordinance made subsequently to the contrary. VIII QUIT-RENT OF FIVE SHILLINGS GRANTED BY FITZAL- WYN OUT OF LAND IN THE PARISH OF ST. MARY BOTHAW, PAID BY THE DRAPERS' FRATERNITY, September 30, 7 Henry VI, 1418 ^ Ordinance Book, Drapers' Hall, No. 79J, p. 4. IsTE Henricusj^/V Major Primus London obiit 13* Kal. Oc'. videlicet anno decimo Regis Johannis et sepul- This Henry was the first Mayor of London ; he died on the 19th ot September in the tenth year of King Ill §imt-Rent hy Fitzalwyn tus est intra introitum capellae in medio sub lanura [lamina ?] ' mar- morea. - Sciant presentes et futuri quod ego H. Filius Alwini de London) dedi et concessi et hac presenti Carta mea confirmavi Deo et Ecde- siae Sanctae Trinitatis London) Et Canonicis ibidem Deo servienti- bus pro salute animae Regis Henrici et animae meae et antecessorum et successorum meorum et omnium fidelium defunctorum in puram et perpetuam ekmosinam quinque solidos quieti reditus de terra quam Henricus Toltrych tenuit de me, inter terram quam AUwinus Dubbur tenuit versus orientem et terram quam Laurentius Plumbarius tenuit versus occidentem habendum et te- nendum predictae Ecclesiae Sanctae Trinitatis et Canonicis ibidem Deo servientibus in perpetuum libere quiete integre et finabiliter ad fa- ciendum servicium pro anima prae- dicti Regis Henrici et pro anima mea, et animabus omnium fidelium defunctorum in die anniversarii obitus mei annuatim quando eve- nerit ut autem haec mea donatio et concessio perpetua firmitate con- sistat, presentem paginam sigilli mei munimine roboravi. Et haec nomina solventium : H. Toltrych, Dubber, relicta Toltrjch. John and was buried in the centre of the porch of the Chapel under a marble slab(?). Let all present and future know that I, H. Fitzalwyn of London, have granted and conferred and con- firmed by this Deed to God and to the Church of the Holy Trinity in London and to the Canons serving God therein, for the weal of the soul of King Henry and of mine and of my ancestors and successors and of aU the faithful dead, in perpetual frankalmoign five shillings quit-rent from the land which Henry Tol- trych held of me, lying between the ground to the East which Allwyn Dubbur held and the ground to the West which Lawrence the Plumber held, to be had and to be held by the said Church of the Holy Trinity and by the Canoas serving God therein, in perpetuity freely, quietly, fiiUy and finally, in order that they may do service for the soul of the aforesaid King Henry, and for my soul and for the souls of all the faithful dead every year on the anniversary of my death when that shall happen. And that this, my gift and concession, may stand fast for ever I have con- firmed this document with the guarantee of my seal. These are the names of those who have paid (the quit-rent) : H. Toltrych, Dubber, the widow of Toltrych. ' The word ' lanura ' is not known. Linura is used to mean ' a woollen tippet ', and if this were read, it would give some authority for the tradition that Fitzalwyn was a draper, or connected with the wool trade. But the word is very distinctly written * lana ' in the original. Probably the word should be read ' lamna *, a contraction for ' lamina ' j this would mean a ' marble slab ', which makes good sense. paid by the Drapers^ Fraternity 113 R. Scott, G. Wolfe, anno 44 H. III. John Kimesynge pistor, 1 Ed. II. Relicta ejusdem, 5 Ed. IL H. Aumener, 19 Ed. II. John Kimesinge aurifaber, i Ed. Ill, qui concessit dictum tenementum J. Hamond, quod in parochia B. Mariae situm est. R. Scott, G. Wolfe, in the 44th year of H. III. John Kimesynge, baker, i Ed. II. His widow, y Ed. II H. Aumener, 19 Ed. II. John Kimesinge, goldsmith, I Ed. Ill, who granted the said tenement which lies in the parish of B. Mary to J. Hamond. John Hamond, 1 1 Ed. Ill, Relicta ejusdem, 30 Ed. III. Dominus Thos. Salisbury, jf Ed. UI. Paulus Salisbury, 8 Ric. II — 11 Ric. IL Modo fratemitas Pannariorum et sic Magistri dictae artis — ^vid: W. Crowmer, J. Gedney, W.Wes- ton, J. Hygham, R. Att Lee, visa carta prescripta, de consensu om- nium artis predictae bene solverunt. Acquietantia inde re- cq>t^ cujus data est in crastino S. Michaelis, 7 Henry VL Et in- super copiam dictae cartae habue- xunt, et in papyro suo inscribi fecerunt. The aforesaid writing in all this side contained is only for a quit- rent of 5^x. yearly to be paid at Michaelmas to Crkherche out of our lands in S' Mary Bothaw Parish. John Hamond, 1 1 Ed. III. His widow, 30 Ed. III. Lord Thos. Salisbury, 3 5- Ed. III. Paul Salisbury, 8 Ric. II— 11 Ric. II. Now the Fraternity of the Dra- pers, that is to say, the Maisters of the said Mystery, namely, W. Crowmer, T. Gedney, W. Weston, I. Hygham, R. Att Lee, having seen the aforementioned deed, have fiilly paid (the said quit-rent) and re- ceived an acquittance, dated the day after St. Michael's day 7 Henry VI, and have received a copy of the said Deed and have had it in- scribed in their book. 114- Letters Tatent of 17 Henry VI IX LETTERS PATENT OF KYNG HENRY THE VF= TO THE MYSTERY OF DRAPERS CONSTITUTING THEM ONE BODY AND PERPETUAL COMMUNITY, 17 Henry VI, November 30, 1458. Drapers' Hall; Book of Evidences A, No. 388, fo. if^a. a; Charter A.V. 287. Letters Patent Henry by the grace of God king of England and France and Lord of Ireland, To all to whom these present Letters shall come. Greeting : Know ye that we of our especial grace and charitable intent and on account of the especial devotion which we bear to the glorious Mother of God the Virgin Mary, Have granted for us our heirs and successors as much as lieth in us to our well beloved liegemen of the Mystery of Drapers within our City of London that they may unite, found, create, erect and establish in the City aforesaid one Gild or Fraternity in honour of the blessed Virgin Mary from among the men of the Mystery aforesaid and others, and that they may have and hold such Gild or Fraternity so united, founded, cre- ated, erected and established, and the same enjoy to them and their successors to all future times. And that they may increase and augment the same Gild and Fraternity as often and when to them it shall seem necessary and fit. And that the men of the said Gild or Fra- ternity may in every year elect and make from among themselves one Master and four Wardens, who at Ires patents Henricus Dei grg) Rex Anglie 5 fFrancie ^ Dominus Hibnie Omnibj ad quos p)sentes Ire pue- rDint saltm Sciatis qd de gra) nra) speciali (J caritatis intuitu ac ob specialem deuocoem quam ad gliosam dei genitricem ^ virginem mariam nrS mentis intuitu gerim^ 5 hemus concessim' p nob hereS) 5 Successorib3 nri§ quantum in nobis est dittis ligeis nri§ hominibj mistere Pannarioij infra Ciuitatem nram london) qd ipi in Ciuitate p)dca) vnam Gildam siue ffra?nita- tem in honore bte marie uirginis de hominibj mistere p)dc9 ^ aliis vnire fundare creare erigere 5 sta- bilire Gildamqj siue ffra?nitatem illam sic unitam fundatam creatam erectam (J stabilitam here ^ tenere eademqj gaudere possint sibi ^ Successoribj suis ppetuis futuris temporibus duraturis Et qd ipi eandtm Gildam siue ffra?nitatem augere (J augmentare valeant quo- ciens ^ quando eis videbitur nece- safm (J oportunum Et qd homines Gilde siue ffra?nitatis illius quoit Anno eligere (J facere possint de seipis vnum Magistrum ^ quatuor Custodes qui tempore eleccois eoij Charter of Incorporation ns faint pannarij ^ libi Roies Civi- tatis p)dc9 ad supportanS) onera negociojj tarn misteram p)dcain q*in Gildam siue flFra?iutatem illam tan- gencia (J concernenciQ Necnoa ad supintenS) regenS) ^ gubnanS) easdem misteram Gildam (J ffra- ternitatem (J omnes homines ^ negocia eojjdem imppm Et qd dcS Magister (J Custodes ac ffratres (J Sorores Gilde siue ffra?nitatis predce sint in re ^ noie vnum Corpus 5 vna Comunitas perpetua lieantqj Successione ppetuam ^ Coe Sigillum y negociis tarn mis- tere p)dce q»m Gilde 5 ffra?nitat§ p)dcajj §uitu? Et qd ipl (J Succes- sores sui imppm sint psone habiles 5 capaces in lege ad pquirenS) in feo3) 5 ppetuitate terras tenta red- ditus ^ alias possessiones quascQqj de quibuscaq3 psonis Et qd ijdem magister ^ Custodes ^ eojj Suc- cessores imppm p nomen Magistri 5 Custodum Gilde siue ffra?nitat§ bte marie Pannarioij london plitare possint ^ implitari Coram quibus- cuq3 ludicibj in Cu? ^ Accionibj quibuscuq5 In cuius rei testimoniQ has Iras nras fieri fecimus patentes Teste meipo apud Warrewyk tri- cesimo die Nouembris Anno regni nfi decimo septimo. Sturgeon. p bre de priuato sigillo (J p quadraginta libris solu? in Hanapio. the time of their election shall be Drapers and freemen of the City aforesaid, to support the burden of business touching and concerning as well the Mystery aforesaid as the Gild or Fraternity ; as also to overlook, rule and govern the same Mystery, Gild and Fraternity, and all the men and business of the same for ever. And that the said Master and Wardens and brothers and sisters of the Gild or Fraternity aforesaid may be in fact and name One Body and one perpetual com- munity, and that they may have perpetual succession and a common Seal to serve as well for the business of the Mystery aforesaid as of the Gild and Fraternity aforesaid. And that they and their successors may be fit persons and capable in law to purchase in fee and perpetuity lands, tenements, rents and other pos- sessions whatsoever, from whom- soever persons. And that the same Master and Wardens and their successors for ever by the name of the Master and Wardens of the Gild or Fraternity of the Blessed Mary of Drapers of London may plead and be impleaded before whomsoever judges in Court, and in whatsoever actions. In Witness whereof we have caused these our Letters Patent to be made. Wit- ness myself at Warwick the thirtieth day of November in the seventeenth year of our reign. Sturgeon. By letter under the Privy Seal in return for ^4.0 paid into the Hanaper. zi6 Grant of the Farm of Aulnage X GRANT OF THE FARM OF AULNAGE TO THE DRAPERS, 17 Henry VI, February \6^ 1439 (New Style) Drapers' Hall; Charter A. V. z88. Henricus Dei gratia Rex Anglie 5 Francie Q; Dominus Hibnie Om- nibj ad quos S)sentes Ire putiSint sattm Sciatis qd) cum Dili Magnates ^ Coitates regni nostri Angl in magno Consilio DnD E. nup Regis Angl pgenitoris nrD apud WestiS) nup tento p remissione quam ad re- quisicoem eo:;dem fecit de forisfcuris ad ipum de vlnagio pannoij venaliffl infra idem regnO) nrin) ptinentib^ concesserint eidem pgenitori nro quoddamsubsidiu) de singulis pannis venalibj tam vnius coloris q^m a!- ?ius infra idem regnQ nruii^ Angt vlt* custumas inde debitas de ven- ditore capienS vidett de quoit panno de assisa in quo gr^ii) non fui? quatuor denarios^dedimiSlhuiu'pannoduos denarios de quoit panno de Scarleta de assisa sex denarios ^ de dimi8| hui' panno tres denarios (J de quoit panno de dimiSj g^no de assisa quinqj denarios (J de dimiS] hui^ panno duos denarios ^ vnQ obolum d de quoit panno dimidiQ pannu de assisa p tres ulnuas (J amplius exce- dente qui pannus de assisa integ non fiiit, Et etiam de quoit panno pann3 integrum de assisa ptres vlnas 5 amplius excedente iuxta ratam subsidij de panno integro de eadem sorte sic soluenD] ad opus nrm) capiat?. Ita q8| quicq^m de codem Henry by the grace of God King of England and France and Lord of Ireland, To all to whom these present Lettersmay come,Greeting : Know ye that, whereas the lords and commons of our kingdom of England in the Great Council of the Lord Edward late King of Eng- land our progenitor, of late held at Westminster, did, in return for a remission of forfeitures due to him from theaulnageof cloth sold within our kingdom which he made at their request, grant to the said ancestor of ours a certain subsidy from every cloth as well of one colour as another sold in our said kingdom of England, besides the customs thence due from the seller of the same, that is to say, that, on whatsoever cloth of assize (of legal measure) wherein there is no grain four pence shall be taken, and on every half such cloth two pence, and on every c'oth of assize of scarlet sixpence, and on every half such cloth three pence, and on every cloth half grain of assize five pence, and on every half such cloth two pence half penny; and on every cloth exceeding the half cloth of assize by three yards or more, which is no whole cloth of assize, and also on every cloth exceeding the whole cloth of assize by three yards or more, after the rate of the subsidy which is to be paid on the whole cloth of the same sort ; provided always that on cloths to the Drapers' Fraternity 117 Subsidio de aliquibj pannis quos aliquis ^ vestura sua ^ femilie sue fieri fecit aut de pannis sigillo col- lectoris subsidij p)dcD ac signatis de quibj subsidiu) p)dciii) scmel p vendi- torem solutum fui? ad quorumcumqj manus panni illi sic signati deue- Bint ad venden8| vel alio modo non exiga? vel vlna? ^ q8i omes panni antequa sigillo p)dcd sic signati fu8int vendicoi expositi nob sint forisfic. ^ in manQ nrani) p dcu. collectorem vel vlnatorem aut eoj; affius deputatum vel baUiuos ville vbi huiusmodi pannos venales non sigillatos inveniri contigit capian?. Acetiam in eodem Consilio ordi- natum fuisset q8| ulnator Regis pannos venales vlnare fa9 ^ signare p quod signu) homo cognosSe po?it quantum huiusmodipannus continet in se et q8| ulnator capiat de quoit panno integro sic signato videlt de venditore vnu) obolum ^ de dimi8| panno vnu) quadrantem (J qBj idem vlnator se de vlnacoe aliojj pannojj q»m venaliu in aliquo non intro- mittat £t insuper in diQsis statutis continea? q8| pannus de Ray sit longitudinis viginti ^ octo vlnajj mensuratus p listam ^ quinqj quar- fio]^ latitudinis ^ pannus de colore longitudinis viginti ^ sex vlnajj mensuratus p dorsum (J latitudinis sex quarfio]^ ad minus et q8] dimi8] pannus sive sit deRay sive de colore teneat longitudinem ^ latitudinem p)d3as juxta ratam Ac in statute which a man maketh to clothe him- self and his family, and on cloths sealed with the seal of the Collector of the said subsidy on which the said subsidy shall have been once paid by the seller, into whosoever's hands such cloths thus sealed shall have come for the purpose of being sold or in any other manner, no subsidy should be demanded or paid : and that all manner of cloths which be put to sale before they be sealed with the said seal, shall be forfeited to us, and be taken into our hands by the said Collector or aulnager, or by the deputy of either of them, or else by the bailiffs of the town where such cloths for sale not sealed shall be found. And also in the same Council it was ordained that the king's aulnager of cloth shall measure the cloth and mark the same, by which mark a man may know how much the said cloth containeth, and how much the ulnager takes on each whole cloth thus sealed, namely from the seller one halfpenny, and on each half cloth one farthing, and that the said aulnager shall not interfere in the aulnage of any other cloths except those exposed for sale. And moreover in divers statutes it is contained that cloth of ray should be of the length of eight and twenty yards measured from the list, and of the breadth of five quarters ; and cloth of colour of the length of six and twenty yards measured by the back, and of the breadth of six quarters at least j and that a half cloth either of ray or of colour shall have the aforesaid length and breadth according to scale. And in the statute of the Ff ii8 Grant of the Farm of ^ulnage in parliamento diii R. nup Regis Angl scdi post Conquestum anno regni sui decimo septimo tento or- dinatum existat q8| quilt homo regni sui fa9e possit tam pannos de Ker- seys q^m alios talis latitudinis g: longitudinis f ut sibi placuerit (J eosdem pannos vendicoi expone) (J vendere solvendo vlnagiu ^ subsidiu ^ alia denPa videlt de quoit panno ^qualtpecia pannijuxta ratam Aliquo statuto ordinacoe pro- clamacoe restriccoe sive defensione incontrariQ fcis non obstante Et q8| nuUus aliquos pannos vendat aut vendicoi exponat anteq^m pan- ni illi p ulnatorem nrm vlnenl? ^ sigillo ad hoc ordinato sigillent' sub peniscontentisinStatutisindeeditis £t insup in Parliamento DnD H. nup Regis Angl aui nrD apud Westin) primo die Marcij aimo regni sui septimo tento ordinatum fuisset (J stabilitum qS] pannus de colore con- tineat in longitudine viginti ^ octo ulnas mensuratus p dorsum absq5 conculcacoe pannoij ^ in latitudine sex qua?io)j ^ dimi3) ^ si factores pan- nojj pannos suos minoris latitudinis vel longitudinis extunc feSrintijdem factores pannos illosqui pvlnatorem minoris longitudinis vel latitudinis inuenti fQint forisfaB £t q8| idem vlnator dcos pannos capiat (J eos ad Garderobam nraifi) ad opus nrifD libet. Ac in statuto in Parliamento dcD aui nrD anno regni sui vndecimo tento in? ce?a ordinatum sit Q; sta- Parliament of the Lord Richard late King of England the Second held in the seventeenth year of his reign, it was ordained that every man of his realm might make and put to sale and sell cloths, as well Kerseys as others, of such length and breadth as him pleased, paying the aulnage, subsidy, and the other duties, that is to say, on every cloth and every piece of cloth after the rate, notwithstanding any statute, ordinance, proclamation, restriction or order to the contrary j and that none should sell or put to sale any cloths before that they were measured by the King's aul- nager, and sealed with the seal ordered for that purpose under the penalties contained in the Statutes published in this matter. And moreover in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England our grandfather, held at Westmin- ster thie first day of March in the seventh year of his reign, it was ordained and established, that cloth of colour should contain in length twenty-eight yards measured by the back without any crushing of the cloth, and in breadth six quarters and a half, and if the Clothmakers from thenceforth should make their cloths of less length and breadth, that then the same makers should forfeit the cloths, which by the aulnager should be found of less length or breadth ; and that the! said aulnager should seize the same and deliver them to our wardrobe to our use. And in the Statute of the Parliament held in the eleventh year of the reign of our said grand- father, it was amongst other things ordained and established that open to the Drapers^ Fraternity 119 bilitum q8| j)cIamacio apte fieret in partib3 occidentalibj ^ alibi p totum regnu nrm) pdcffi q8| nulla psona ft.ciens huiusmodi pannos ^ duo- denas in partibj occidentalibj pdcii aut alibi infra dcm regnu) nrni) eosdem pannos ^ duodenas non takket aut simul plicet priusq^m pdcus vlnator scrutiniu ^ supvism sua dcbite fe9it de huiusmodi pannis ^ duodenis q8] ipi longitu- dinem ^ latitudinem suas p statu- tum pdcQ vltimo ordinatas teneant sub pena forisfture eojjdem. Nos p jnanucapcoemloliis Stoker Almarici matany Willi Northampton cium , a - 7 § - .P '2 >S ^ -* ?} ?5 Ht -^ ■" o< ':" ^ I 2 t ?;^- "-' o CN h-l rr^ + 1 M fi e < V u w ,^ K 'Oc bl ST ft •a < e OS g P * u H V 03 <" h Ct. rt O •n • »H V) .s S- 00 J .^ < !z [3 i-t o TJ M c PS >±^ r\ .§ u -W K rt o w^^^sm.. Grant of the 'Drapers' Arms xii XI THE GRAUNT OF THE DRAPERS ARMES, March io, 17 Hen. VI, 14.39 (New Style) Drapers* Hall J Book of Evidences A, fo. iJ9a; Ch. XXI. A TouTZ nobles qui cestes pntes verront ou ocrount humble re- comendacoa premise pour moy Guilliam Brugges autrement dit Jarretier Roy Darmes dez Englois le primier • diceluy nonn [nom] et humble Suiture Darmes a tout la gentiless. II a pleu a nre soQaia s' le tres- hault trepuissant et tresexcellent prince le tresxpien Roy Henry le Sysine diceluy nom Roy DengletS & de flfraunce & s' dyreland de sa benigne grace et habundaunce p sez tres patentes ottroier grauntier et accordier a sez humbles et fbiaulx lieges lez gentz du mestier dez Drapiers fraunchisez en sa tres- noble tresfamouse & renomee Citee de loundres fraunchise & libertee dauoir corporacion entre eux du dit mestier et en faire vne meister et quatre gardeins pour regiminer goQnier et auoir survien sur la dit mestier et dan en an renouelier chaungier et eslier entre eux meister et gardeins pour tout dys entretenir To all nobles who shall see or hear these presents, I, William Brugges, otherwise Garter King of Arms of the English, the first of the said title and humble servant of arms to all gentles, offer my humble respects. It hath pleased our sovereign Lord the most high puissant and excellent Prince the most Christian King Henry the Vlth of that name King of England and France and Lord of Ireland, of his benign grace and generosity, by his letters patent to concede, grant and accord to his humble and ^ithfiil lieges, the men of the Mystery of Drapers freemen in his very noble, &mous, and renowned City of London the right and liberty to form a corporation among them- selves of this said Mystery, and to appoint a Master and four Wardens to rule, govern, and have survey over the said Mystery, and to change and elect them year by year, in order to maintain for ever the governance of the said corpora- tion. ' The office Garter King of Arms was created by Henry Vin 1^x7. Bruges was the first Garter j cf. The Book of Dignities, p. 327. SirWm. IIX Grant of the 'Drapers' Arms le conduyt de lour dit corporacion les notables du mestier foundees en tresgraunde honeur et ?tue onnt fbndez entre eux de solempnisier lour dit corporacion vne foitz c&un an Cestassavoire le lundi pschein ensuiant la feste de lassompcion de pluis benoit vierge Dame mere et emperisse de tout celestiel et terre- steer nre tresglorious Dame seint Marie du quel nasquist le celestiel & Imperial soleile le pluis glorious Roy et sire de tout Justice nre benoit s'^Jfiu Crist et en lonneure dicelle pluis benoit vierge et de sa tresglorious feste suisdit lez ditz du mestier rasieses dune comune as- sentment entre eux de cliun au dit iour estre ensemble a compaignies de freres & soers du dit fra?nitee et en yceluy iour renouelier chaungier eslier et instituer nouelx meistre et gardeins auxi come le cas requerera pour lonneure et valitce du dit mestier lez notables du dit mestier contendans daugmentier tout dys ce que poet estre a lonneure du dit mestier onnt fait faire requeste a moy le suysdit jarretiere Roy Darmes dez Englois de lez vouillier aviser et deuiser enseingne en forme de blason soloirD le quel lis pour- roient faire priente* en vne seal comon tant souUement au dit mestier seruier pour soubz ycel seal passer affermer verefier et signefier tout ceo que a lour dit mestier entre eux du mestier pient doit ou pour- The notables of the Mystery founded in very great honour have decided amongst themselves to commemorate their said corpora- tion once a year. That is to say, on the Monday next after the Feast of the Assumption of the most blessed Virgin Lady Mother, and Empress of all things in Heaven and Earth, our very glorious Lady Saint Mary of whom was born the heavenly and Imperial Sun the most glorious King and Lord of all Justice our Blessed Saviour Jesus Christ, and in honour of the said most blessed Virgin and of her very glorious festival aforesaid, the said members of the Mystery have, of common agreement, de- cided to meet every year on the said day, accompanied by the bre- thren and sisters of the said Fra- ternity, and on the said day to renew, change, elect, and institute a new Master and new Wardens as the circumstances may demand, for the honour and welfare of the said Mystery. The notables of the said Mystery, striving ever to increase all that may conduce to the honour of the said Mystery, have made request to me, the aforesaid Garter King of Arms of England, that I would suggest and devise a coat of arms of the form of a blazon, in conformity with which they might have the impress made on a common seal,' to be used only by the said Mystery for pass- ing, affirming, verifying, and attest, ing all that can, ought, or may appertain to their said Mystery For the original seal see p. "J of this volume. Grant of the 'Draper i Arms xig roit apgteignier et auxi pour envser du dit blason en tout autre cas come honeur le requerra & pient & doit requerer, je le suit dit Jarretier Roy Darmes veiant le gu^nt honneure que nre dit soQain s' le tresxplen Roy leur a fait p son noble ottroye et graunt suisdit et auxi pour complier a honurable home Johan Gedney le primer Meistre eslue au commencement de suisdit corporacion p bon meure delibacon et consentment entiere de sa dit compaignie encorporees au dit mestier des Drapiers et auxi pour complier tant as quatre Gar- deins Johan Wotton Johan Derby Robert Bertyn et Thomas Cook que as autres notables de la dit fra?nitee et compaignie. Je lez ay deuisez enseigne en fo'me de blason pour demourer au dit notable mestier pour memoire ppetuell Cestassauoir en lonneur du tresgloriouse vierge et meer Marie le quel est en ovmbre du soleyll et replendisant en tout claritee et nestete leur ay devisez en lour blason troys Royes de soleille issantz hors de troys nves de flambe coronnez de troys corons imperiale* dore assisez sus vne escue dasure et come pient appoire p la demonstraunce du dit blason assise en peinture et en ces drois colo'es en le merge de ceste p)sent Ire et pour veritablement blasonier le dit armorie II covient due 11 porte dasure troys soleilles issantz de troys nves de geullez coronnes de troys Imperiale corons dore le ' See note on amongst themselves, and also to use the said blazon on all other occasions as their dignity requires and can and may require. I, the said Garter King of Arms, seeing the great honour that our said Sovereign lord the most Chris- tian King has done them by his aforesaid noble concession and grant, and also to please the honour- able man John Gedney the first Master elected after the creation of the said Corporation by the good and ripe deliberation and unani- mous consent of the said his Com- pany incorporated in the said Mys- tery of Drapers, and also to please the four Wardens John Wotton, John Derby, Robert Bertyn, and Thomas Cook, as well as the other notables of the said Fraternity and Company, have devised a coat of arms under the form of a blazon to remain to the said honourable Mystery as a perpetual memorial. That is to say, in honour of the very glorious Virgin and Mother Mary who is in the shadow of the sun and yet shines with all clear- ness and purity 1 have devised in their Blazon three sunbeams issu- ing from three flaming clouds crowned with three" Imperial Crowns of gold on a shield of azure and as appears in the de- monstrance of the said blazon painted in their proper colours in the margin of the present letter. And for the true blazoning of the said coat of arms it behoves that it should carry on azure three sun- beams issuing from three clouds gules, crowned with three Imperial the next page. X14 Grant of the 'Drapers' Arms quelle dit blason je le dit Jarretier Roy Darmes certi£e nul auter pson queconque de lisle de la graund Bretaigne le portre ycelle dit blason le dit mestier de le processer pour ppetuell memoire et le mestier dez Drapiers delusier a lonneur du dit mestier en toutz cas licites con- veniens & honourables et come de droit le dit mestier le requerrera Et pour apisaunce a toutz nobles que je le suisdit Roy Darmes ay devise le suisdit blason au dit notable mestier des Drapiers en loundres Jay sealle ceste ^sent Ire de mon seal le disme iour de Mars en Ian du grace mil quatre centz trent et neof et en Ian dyoeptisme du Reigne nfe soQain s' le tresxpjen Roy suisdit. golden crowns; the which blazon I, the said Garter King of Arms, certify that no other person what- soever of the island of Great Britain bears the same blazon, and that the said Mystery shall hold it in perpetual remembrance; and that the said Mystery of Drapers shall use it to the honour of the said Mystery on all lawful, convenient, and honourable occasions, and as the right of the said Mystery shall require. And, as a testimony to all the nobility that I, the afore- said King of Arms, have devised the above-mentioned blazon for the said honourable Mystery of the Drapers in London, I have sealed this present letter with my seal on the tenth day of March in the year of grace one thousand four hundred and thirty-nine and in the seven- teenth year of the reign of our Sovereign the aforesaid most Chris- tian King. The subscription of a Notary, John Daunt, in the presence of William Brugges, the Garter King of Arms, and of four witnesses, Nicholas Wyfold, Grocer, Matthew Ffoucher, Mercer, William Brampton, Court Secretary, and William Parker, Armurarius, follows in Latin, which is thus dated: In the year anno domini 1439 according to the computation of the Church of England, 'indiccione tercia pontificatus Sassimi' [In the 3 rd indictional year of the most Sacred Papacy.]' In the tenth year of our father and lord in Christ Eugenius IV by divine grace Pope. On the eleventh day of March. Unfortunately part of the parchment upon which the Grant is written has been destroyed by fire. Note — The three Imperial Crowns are no doubt the Triple Crown of the Deity, and probably represent Supreme Dominion in Heaven, on ^ For the Indictional Year cf. Bond's Handy Book for verifying Dates, p. iJJ j Art de verifier les dates, i Ed. 3, vol. i, p. 19. Grant of the Drapers' Arms iit Earth, and in the Nether World.' The initial A of the Letters Patent is formed of a representation of the Virgin standing between the Father and the Son, both of whom are wearing the Triple Crown and are crowning the Virgin herself with another Triple Crown, A number of small figures, probably representing the Drapers, stand under the protection of the Virgin's skirts. Above, the Holy Spirit hovers in the form of a dove, over whom again the Triple Crown is seen.^ With these Arms the following seal of the same date should be compared. The original no longer exists, but there is a cast of it in the British Museum, No. 5111. ' Some will have it that the Triple Crown symbolizes the Trinity, but eren in the fifteenth century they would scarcely have given this attribute to the Virgin. There are several representations to be found in mediaeval art of the Virgin being crowned with a single crown ; cf. Jameson, Legends of the Madonna, pp. 14, \6, 19, 13, 2j ; but none, so far as I am aware, of her receiving the Triple Crown. ^ For the initial A, see Frontispiece to vol. i oi the edition de luxe. itos.i G g zx6 Grant of the 'Drapers' Arms The close similarity between it and the Arms on the grant will be observed. On it is found the Virgin, standing three-quarters length, with the Triple Crown of the Deity on her head. In her right hand a sceptre ; in her left a palm-branch. Under her cloak a group of persons, probably representing the Drapers. The Virgin is surrounded by a radiance which is supported by four Angels with wings expanded. Over her head the Almighty, half-length, lifting His right hand in bene- diction : with the left placing the Crown on the Virgin's head. Above, the Holy Spirit represented as a Dove with apparently the Triple Crown, though the impression is not clear. In the base a shield with the Drapers' Arms J three clouds radiated and each surmounted with the Triple Crown. Round the seal runs the inscription ' Sigillu + + Comune Fraternitat' Be' Marie Mistere Pannarior' London '. I add a representation of a Sacramental Pyx surmounted by the Triple Crown and surrounded by veils,' which was often hung over the altar in churches, and whence very probably came the suggestion of the Triple Crown. :===- c'..^-- Then follow the Arms in the Confirmation of the Grant of lyifi, with supporters which are new. Here, the initial letter with the picture of the Virgin is omitted, no doubt because it was held to be superstitious j but the crowns are still those of the Deity. ' British Museum, Harleian MS. 2178, (. %%^. I owe information of this to Canon Dalton, a member of the Drapers' Court. See Hope, English Altars, 1899) PI. X, Fig. i; Rochj Church of our Fathers, ed. 1904, iv. 134-42. Arms of July ij^i Grant of the Th-apers" Arms ^z^ We then come to the Arms in the Second Confirmation of the Grant in idij. Here the Crowns are given four arches, which those in the original grant have not, and this alteration has caused much misapprehension subsequently. Thus Sir Albert Woods, Garter King of Arms from i8(Jc) to 15)04, who presumably only saw the Crowns in the later grant, gave an opinion that they were royal crowns, but that, to distinguish them from the royal diadem, strawberry leaves were substituted for the fleur-de- lis and cross patee on the band. Ggi 2i8 Grant of the 'Drapers' Arms Finally comes the existing seal of the Company of the date 1771, and the Arms of to-day. Present-day Seal. Arms of To-day. The seal, it will be seen, resembles the old seal closely. Nevertheless a shield with the Drapers' Arms takes the place of the figures under the Virgin's skirts, the radiance is supported by two angels only, and the crown worn by the Virgin and on the shield resembles that of the Papal Tiara. This crown also appears in the present Arms, but the supporters differ from those on the Arms of lyfji and 1^13. Inspeximus Charter of 6 Edward IV zz^ XII INSPEXIMUS CHARTER of July %6, 6 Edward IV {1^66), CONFIRMING AND EXPANDING THAT OF 1 7 HeNRY VI Drapers' Hallj Book of Evidences, No. 388, fo. i^6h; Charter XIII Ires patenti Edwardus Dei gr5) Rex Anglic & ffrancie & Dominus Hibnie Omibj ad quos pJsentes Ire pueri)int sattm Inspeximus Iras patentes H. sexti nup de facto & non de iure Regis Anglie fcas in hec verba Henricus Dei gracia Rex &9 vt patet ex al?a pte huius folij Jamqj ex parte dilcoij ligeojj nroij Henrici Waver Militis nunc Magistri & Thome Eyre Thome Salle Johis Brokford & Willi White nunc Custodum Gilde slue flra?nitatis p)dce nob est fimli? supplica? vt cum ipi ^ exhibicoe & sustentacoe duoij Capellanoij p bono statu nostro ac p)diltissime Consortis nre Elizabeth Regine Anglie & Sano Regimine Gilde seu ffra?ni- tatis p)dce ac p bono & salubri sanitate flfratiQ & soroij eiusdem dum viSim* necnon ^ animabj nri§ cum ab hac luce migravDm^ & p Letters Patent Edward by the Grace of God King of England and France and Lord of Ireland. To all to whom these present Letters shall come, greeting. We have seen the Let- ters Patent of Henry Vlth, late in fact but not by right King of Eng- land and France and Lord of Ire- land, in these words : ' Henry by Grace of God, &c.' as appears in the other part of this folio. And now we are humbly peti- tioned by our beloved liegemen Henry Waver, Knight, now Master, and Thomas Eyre, Thomas Salle, John Brockford,and William White, now Wardens of the aforesaid Gild or Fraternity, that they may, in virtue of our licence, possess and apply lands, tenements, rents, and other possessions, to be held as follows hereafter, to the purpose of providing for the maintenance and sustenance of two chaplains to pray and celebrate divine service for our good estate, and for that of our most dear Consort Elizabeth, Queen of England, and for the wholesome governance of the aforesaid Gild or Fraternity, as well as for the good and sound health of the brothers and sisters of the same, while we live, also for our souls when we de- part from this life, and for the souls of xgo Inspeximus Charter of 6 Edward IV aiibj illustrissimi principis RicD nuper Ducis Eboij patris nrD Ed- mundi nup Comitis RotelP ffratris nfi ac nup carissimi Consanguinei nri RicD nup Comitis Saij & nup dilci & fideJis Consanguinei nri Thome Nevill Milit§ fit eiusdem Comitis Sajj Acetiam ^ animabj ffratram & soro^j Gilde siue fFrater- nitatis illius defunctcjj exoratu? & diuina celebratu? terras teiita & redditus ac alias possessiones in forma subsequenti lienS) licencia nra mediante pquirere afFectent & disponant'' velimus sibi in hac parte munificenciam nf am regiam graciose exhibere Nos hmoi sanam afFec- coem & piam disposicoem merito contemplantes cupientes qj fimoi laudabile ppositum multum & spe- ramus deo gratum quantum ad nos attinet felici? promoueri De gra) nra speciali Iras p)dcas ac oinia & singula in eisdem con- tenta rata Bentes & grata ea ^ nobis & heredP nris quantum in nobis est acceptamus approbamus & ratificamus ac eisdem nunc Magistro & CustodJb5 & Suc- cessoribj suis tenore p)sentium con- cedim' & confirmamus prout Ire predce racionabiliter testant' Et vl?ius de vbiori gra nra concessim^ & licenciam dedimus & p pJsentes concedimus & licenciam damus j) nobis & hereS] nris quantum in nobis est pfatis nunc Magro & Custodib3 qd ipi & Successores sui ter? ten) & redditus ac alias posses- siones quascumqj cum ptin ad valorem viginti librai^L p annu licet de nobis in capite seu aliter seu de aliis psonis quibuscffiqj p quod- cumqj §uicium teneant"- a quibus- the most illustrious prince Richard late Duke of York, our father; Ed- mund late Earl of Rutland our brother; our most dear kinsman Richard late Earl of Salisbury ; our late beloved and faithful cousin, Thomas Neville, Knight, £on of the said Earl of Salisbury, and also for the souls of the brethren and sis- ters of the Gild or Fraternity when deceased. We wishing to graciously show our royal munifi- cence, and approving such a healthy affection and pious intention, ana desiring to promote, as far as in us lies, such a laudable proposal and pleasing, as we hope, to God, do, of our special favour, accept, ap- prove, and ratify the aforesaid letters, and every thing general and particular in them contained for us and for our heirs so far as lieth in us, and concede and con- firm to the present Master and Wardens and their successors by the tenor of these presents, as the aforesaid letters reasonably witness. And further of the abundance of our Grace we have granted and given licence, and by these presents do grant and give licence, for us and our heirs so far as in us lies to the aforesaid present Master and Wardens and their successors to acquire and receive lands, tene- ments, rents, and other possessions whatsoever, with their appurten- ances to the value of £t.o per annum, from any persons or person whomsoever, who may be willing to grant and give such lands, tene- Inspeximus Charter of 6 Edward IV xgi cu)q5 psonis siue a quacQqj psona hmoi ter? ten & redditus ac alias possessiones cum ptin eis dare & concedere volentibj seu volente ad- quirere & recipe possint liendP & tenendP eisdem nunc Magro & Cus- todibj & Successoribus suis p)dci§ impgm Et eisdem psonis siue psofD qdP ipe vel ipa timoi ter? ten) & red- ditus ac alias possessioes cum ptiii ad dcm annuum valorem p)fatis nunc Magfo & Custodibj & successoribj suis dare possint vel possit ac con- cedere & assignare &en3) & tcnendP sibi vt p)dcm est imppm tenore psenciu simili? licenciam dedimus specialem tam in exhibicoem & sus- tentacoem capellanojj p)dc6:j sicut pkiciii est exoratu? & diuina cele- bratu? imppm q^malioijoiiiumGilde siue £Fra?natati p)dce incumbenciu absq3 impeticoe vel impedimento nfi vel heredum nroiji lustiS Escae- toij VicecomitQ Balliuoij seu aliojj ministroij nroij vel heredum nrojj quojjcQq3 & absqj aliquo bri de ad quod Dampnum siue aliquo alio mandate nfo vel heredum nro:; in hac parte impetrandP seu psequendP & absqj aliqua Inquisicoe inde vir- tute bris siue mandati hmoicapiendP ac absqj aliquo fine seu ftodo p pjsentibj ad opus nfm quouis modo petendP soluendP seu capiendP Sta- tute de ter? & teii) ad manum mor- tuam non ponendP edito aut aliquo alio statute actu siue ordinacione incontrariu) fac? ordina? siue puis non obstan? In cuius rei testi- moniu has Iras nras fieri fecimus ments, rents, and other possessions, whether they are held of us in chief or otherwise, or of other persons whomsoever and by whatsoever services, to be owned and held by the present Master and Wardens and their aforesaid heirs for ever. And we allow the said persons or person that he, or she, may give, grant, and assign the like lands, tenements, rents, and other posses- sions, with their appurtenances to the value of ^20 per annum, to the said present Master and Wardens and their successors, to be had and possessed for ever as above said, according to the tenor of these presents. And likewise we have granted special licence as well for the maintenance and sustenance of the two chaplains aforesaid to pray and celebrate divine service for ever, as for all the other burdens of the said Gild or Fraternity, without let or hindrance on our part or on the part of our heirs, justices, escheators, sheriffs, bailiffs, or other of our officials, or of our heirs whatsoever, and without any writ of ' ad quod damnum ', or other mandate of us or our heirs in this behalf, being issued or prose- cuted or any inquisition being taken by virtue of any such writ or mandate, or any fine or fee being in any way demanded at our need forthese presents : notwithstanding the Statute against lands and tene- ments being put into mortmain, or any other Statute, act, or ordi- nance made, ordained, or provided to the contrary. In testimony whereof we have caused these our Letters Patent to be made. Wit- x^x Inspeximus Charter of 6 Edward IV patentes teste me ipo apud Westm) ness myself at Westminster the vicesimo sexto Die Julij anno regni afJth day of July in the sixth year of nri sexto our reign, ^a j)„j Bagot. By the King himself and the 1456. p ipm Regem & de data pdca autliority of parliament of the afore- auctoritate pliamenti. said date. Bagot. XIII CONFIRMATION OF THE DRAPERS' RIGHT OF SEARCH, 1.6 Henry VI, 1447 Drapers* Hallj Book of Evidences A, No. 388, fo. \6o a. Rex &ct Maiori & Aldermannis &ct And where the Maister & Wardeyns of the mystere of Taillours in our Citie of london and John lokok John Copmyll John langwith & Thomas Raymond Citezeins & Taillors within our said Citie haue compleyned to vs ayenst Piers Calcote Henry Bray Henry Kent & William Russell Wardeyns of the mystere of Drapers of our said Citie of that, that they of their owne wrong with outen matier or cause resonable now late came to the hous of the said John John John & Thomas within the iFraunchise of our said Citie wrongfully and, ayenst our lawes Claymyng & pretendyng to make serche of mete yerdes and wollenclothes by the same John John John & Thomas put to sale within their houses within our said Citie to the gret trouble hurt & grevaunce of the said playntifes and of the said mystere of Taillours And vpon the which compleynt to vs thus made It was commaunded by vs vnto our Chaunceller and other of our lordes of our Counsell to Doo come before theym aswell the said Playntiffes as the said Piers Henry Henry & William And thervpon taking vnto theym our Chief Jugge & other of our Juges in the presence of the said parties Such ma tiers & difference bitwixt the said mystere of Drapers & Taillours within the said Citie for the Serche of mette yerdes & wollencloth vsed & put to sale to retaille by the said Taillors to ende and determyne for a conclusion of such difierens to endure perpetuell, And for asmoch as by our Chaunceller & other of our said lords of our said counsell taking vnto theym our chief Juge & other of our Juges according to our said commaundment at diuers tymes haue doon come before theym the said parties and herde their compleynts answeres & replicacions with all the circumstaunces therto belonging touching the said difference of serche And for asmoche as we been acerteyned that such differences that haue fallen before tyme bitwene Crafts of london haue be accustumed to be Confirmation of Right of Sear ch, 144-7 '2133 only reformed by the Meyre & Aldremen of the said Citie & none other We willing the laufiill Rules & custumes to be contynued & had and not to be abrigged nor hurte in no manner woUe & charge you that first serched & seen by theym in all haist goodly all our recordes of our said Citie concernyng the said difference of serche & other lyke to theym And this doon & vnderstonde that ye so Demeane this matier that the said wardeyns of Drapers haue their serche of metyerds & Wollencloth vsed & put to sale to retaille according to the customes acts & orde- nances enacted & ordeyned of record before you in the Chambre of our said Citie in semblabe manner & forme as other Crafts within our said Citie vse & haue been accustumed to doo that is to sey to serche all thing belonging & concernyng to their Craft openly thorough oute our said Citie &ct And this we charge you streytly eny writing or com- maundment writen or made vnto you by vs tofore this tyme to the contrary notwithstonding. This matier before reherced is in the Guyldehall vnder the kings scale ensealed. XIV ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR CONFIRMING THE RIGHT OF SEARCH OF WOOLLEN CLOTHS, Oct. (J, x6 Henry VI, 1447 Drapers' Hall; Book of Evidences A, No. 388, fo. 161 z. MemoraneP qdP Die veii)is sexto Be it noted that on Friday, the die Octob? Anno ri§ Henrici sexti sixth day of October in the zdth post conqin) vicesimo sexto vene- year of King Henry the Vlth's runt hie in in?iori Cain)e Guihalde reign, there came, here in the inner ciuitatis london coram lofie Olney chamber of the Guildhall of the City Maiore & Aldermannis ciuitatS of London, before John Olney the p)dce Magister et Gardiani mistere Mayor, and the Aldermen of the Panna? eiusdem ciuitatis necnon aforesaid City the Master and War- q^m plures alij probi holes eiusdem dens of the Mystery of Drapers of Mistere declarantes quomodo re- the said City together with several troact§ temporibj Magis? & Gar- other good men of the same Mystery diani mistere p)dce cum vno iuiente who declared that, in times past, the Cain)e GuihaldP p)dce qui p) tempe Master and Wardens of the afore- fu)at deputa? cu) dn§ Maior talem said Mystery, togetherwith one ser- §uien? ad hoc deputaQ voliJit hue- jeant of the Guildhall Chamber, who was deputed for the occasion when- ever the lord Mayor chose so to do, i«A..i H n X34 Confirmation of the 'Drapers' runt & Bere consueuerut scrutinia oim & singlojj pannojj laneorjjL & virgarjj voca? metyerds oim & sin- glorjj CiuiS Ciuitatis p)dce pannos laneos infra libtatem eiusdem Qui'' vendenciu) ad retalliam intime sup- plicantes eisdem Maiori & Alder- mannis quatenus ipi nunc Mags? & Gardiani Mistere p)dce Ac omes illi Magistri & Gardiani eius- dem Mistere qui infutu? hmoi scru- tiniu) suu) dece?o eScere valeant & here p)ut eScere & feere solebant. Et quia equitai vsu puenit & con- censit iusticia qdP adiuncta peticio racioni mansuetos inueniat audi- tores Ideo p die? Maiorem & Alder- mannos consideratum fuit & fui- sum qd pfa? nunc Magister & Gardiani Mistere p)dce ac Succes- sores sui MagrD & Gardiani qui ^ tempe fQlnt scrutiniu) here debeant & Scere oim & singuloj; Ciuiu) Ciuita?s p)dce pannos laneos infra libtatem eiusdem Ciuitati venden- ci3 ad retalliani sub Maioris dee CiuitatS autoritate qui p tempe fu)it vnacu) §uiente Caiiie p)dce ad Clauam eis assignandP prout hacte- nus here & 2cere consueuerut Et defectus si quos infutu? hmoi scru- tinio faciendP inueniri contigit bn & fideli? absq3 aliquo inde concela- mento CanDario Ciuitatis p)dce qui |) tempe fu)it prout moris est p)sentandP et9. Presentibj ad tunc ibm lohe Ol- ney Maiore, Robto Danvers Re- held and were accustomed to hold a search of all and several woollen cloths and yards termed 'met- yards ' belonging to all and several citizens of the aforesaid City, who sold woollen cloths by retail within the liberty of the said City, and prayed the said Mayor and Alder- men that they, the present Master and Wardens of the aforesaid Mys- tery, and all future Masters and Wardens, should have authority to exercise hereafter the search, as they have hitherto enjoyed and exercised it. And whereas it seemed equitable and just that this petition should receive favourable hearing, it was, after consideration, decided by the said Mayor and Aldermen that the aforesaid Master and Wardens of the aforesaid Mystery, and all future Masters and Wardens and their successors, should have and exercise the right of search over all and several, citizens of the aforesaid City selling woollen cloths by retail within the liberty of the said City, under the authority of the Mayor of the said City for the time being, together with a serjeant at Mace of the aforesaid Chamber to be assigned to them, as they have been accustomed hitherto to have and exercise. And all defects, if any shall be found in making the said search, shall be presented to the Chamberlain for the time being without concealment as is the custom. Entered in the Book marked with the letter K folio ccxxxvii in the presence of John OIney, Mayor, Robert Danvers the Recorder, Si- Right of Search t^s cordatore, Simone Eyre, WiHino mon Eyre, William Coumbes, John Coumbes, lohe Norman, loRe Sut- Norman, John Sutton, William ton, Wiltmo Gregory, Nicho Wy- Gregory, Nicholas Wyfold, Ste- fold, Stepfio flbrster, Galfrido phen Fforster, Geoffrey Ffeldyng, ffeldyng, lohe Derby, Willo Cant- John Derby, William Cantlowe, lowe, Thoma Scott & Wiltmo Thomas Scott, and William Abra- Abrah»m Aldris. ham Aldfis. Intrat* in libro signato cQ tra K folio ccxxxvij". Note. This is entered in the new booke that M' Woodcocke made A» 1 5:00 and yt is cutt owte off the same booke of K wUn the Guyldehall. XV THE DRAPERS AND THE SHEARMEN Drapers* Hall ; Book of Evidences A, No. 388, fo. 15:7 b. A patent graunted by Kyng Edward the fourth to the feliship of Drapers that the Shermen shall haue no Corporacion graunted to theym nor any correccion of the Drapers or Taylors. — April p, ip Edward IV, 14.7^. Ires patents. Edward by the grace of god Kyng of Englond and of ffraunce and lord of Irlande To our trusty and welbelouid the Maisters Wardeyns and hole ffelaships of the two Crafts or Mistiers of Drapers and Taillours of our Citee of london that now be and that hereafter for the tyme shall be gretyng. Where as certeyn persones now late haue sued vnto vs vpon diners subiecdons & surmyses that we by our lettres patents vnder our great Scale shuld incorporate the men of the ffeliship of Shermen of our said Citee, And that we shuld graunte vnto theym therupon certeyn liberties conteyned in a bill of their desire and petition therupon to vs putte. We seyng the many & great Inconueniences which by all likly- hode wull ensue of the said corporacion and graunt yf it shuld passe vs, of our mere mocion graunte by thise our present lettres vnto the said maisters wardeyns and ffelaships of the said ij Crafts or mistiers of Drapers and Taillors of our said Citee that we shall nat at any tyme hereafter by our lettres patents or otherwise of auctorite graunte vnto the x^6 The Drapers and the Shearmen said ffeliship of Shermen that now be or hereafter shall be in our said Citee of london any Corporacion or any other privilege or Auctorite touching to their said Craft of Shermen nor we woll that in any wise the said felaship of Shermen that now be or that hereafter shall be haue from- hensforth exercise nor vse vpon eny Craft of the said Citie and euspeciall vpon any of the said ij Crafts of Drapers and Taillors any maner serche correccion or auctorite other than by the maire of our Citie for the tyme beyng and his Brethern shall be lefully commytted vnto theym. And where as the Wardeyns of the said fFelaship of Shermen according to the laudable custume of our said Citee haue serche of all manner werkmanship of sheryng of wollen Clotheswithin their owne Craft lyke as the Wardeyns of other Crafts there haue. We woll that whan the Wardeyns of the said Craft of Shermen by their serche made within their owne Craft fynde eny Clothe or clothes vnduely shorne apperteynyng to eny parsone of either of the said ij Crafts of Drapers and Taillours or to any other parsone of any other Craft of our said Citee That than the same Wardeyns of Shermen in nowise therfore attache cease nor bere awey the Qoth so vnduely shorne lyke as they haue doon in tyme past as we be enformed but that they therfore punysshe & correct the werkmen of the same Clothe or Clothes for his defaute in that partie according to reason. In witnesse wherof we haue made thise our lettres patents. Witnessyng our self at Bukden the ix Day of Aprell the xix yere of our Reigne MORLAND. p ipm Regem. XVI LETTERS PATENT RELEASING THE FRATERNITY OR GILD OF DRAPERS FROM ALL FORFEITURES BEFORE FEB. ir, 1484. May a I, I Richard III, 1484, Drapers* Hall ; MS. Charters A. V. zSp. RiCARDUs Dei gra Rex Anglie Richard by the grace of God ^ Francie ^ Dominus Hibnie King of England and of France and Omibj Ballivis ^ Fidelibj suis ad lord of Ireland to all his bailiflfs and quos p)3entes Ire peruSint Saltm liegemen to whom these presents Sciatis qO] de gra) nra) spali ac ex ci^a shall come, greeting. We give you to know, that of our special grace, with full know- ledge and of our own free will we Letters "Patent of Richard III xg7 scienciaet meromotunrispdonauiiSi remisiiS) et relaxauimus Magf o Gilde siue Fraternitatis be Marie Panna- rioij ciuitatis London) ac Custodibj siue Gardianis gilde siue Fraterni- tatis pidic? alias dels nunc Magfo gilde siue fra^nitatis be Marie Pan- narioij; Ciuitatis LondofD necnon nunc Custodibj siue Gardianis gilde siue fra?nitatis pdic? ^ successoribj suis magroac Custodibj siue Gardia- nis d9e gilde siue fra?nitatis p tem- pore existeii) seu quibuscunqj aliis noibj censean? om°mo3) tr^nsgres- siones fbrisfacturas penas debi?niis- prisiones contemptus ^ impeticoes p i^os magrin) ^ custodes siue gardia- nos ante vicesim) priin) diem Feb- ruary anno regni nrD primo cont* formam Statuto)jL de Signis libatis pannoij ac capiciojj ac retencoibj quibuscumqj fac? siue ppetra? unde puniciocaderet in demanB] debi? seu in finem et redempcion aut in alias penas pecuniarias seu imprisonamen- ta Statutis p)dc5s, non obstantibj. Et insup ex gra) ^ sciencia ac motu nris p)dcis pdonaviin) remisiirD ^ relaxaviin) eisdem magro (J custodibj siue gardianis Sectam pacis nr9 que ad nos 9sus i^os ptinet ^ omimo8| j)dicoIbj murdris raptibj muliejj rebellionibj insurrecionibj feloniis conspiracioibj cambipartiis manute- nentiis confederacionibj riotis routis conventiculis illicitis imbraciariis (J aliis transgressionibj ofFencis negligenciis extorcionibj mespri- have pardoned, remitted, and con- doned to the Master of the Gild or Fraternity of the Blessed Virgin of Drapers of the City of London, and to the Wardens or Guardians of the said Gild or Fraternity as they were called at other times, but now to the Master of the Gild or Fraternity of the Blessed Virgin of Drapers of the City of London, as well as the Wardens or Guardians of the said Gild or Fraternity and to their successors, the Master and Wardens or Guardians of the said Gild or Fraternity for the time being, or under whatever other names they may be known, all man- ner of transgressions, forfeitures, penalties, debts, misprisions, con- tempts, or exactions done or per- petrated by the said Master and Wardens or Guardians, before the a 1st day of February in the first year of our reign, against the tenor of the Statutes concerning livery ot cloth and of hoods and mainte- nance, for which acts punishment might fall in the form of fine, re- demption, or any other penalty in money or imprisonment, notwith-. standing the said Statutes, And moreover of our said grace, know- ledge, and free will we have par- doned, remitted, and condoned to the said Master and Wardens or Guardians all criminal proceedings which lie with us against them for every kind of treason, murders, rapes, rebellions, insurrection, felonies, conspiracies, champerties, maintenances, confederacies, riots, routs, unlawful assemblies, judicial corruptions, and for all other trans- gressions, offences, negligences, ex- xgS Letters Tatent of Richard III sionibj ignoranciis contemptibj con- cealamentis forisfacturis Q; decep- coibj p ip)os magrm Q: custodes siue gardianos ante dcQ vicesiifD priffi) diem Februarij qualiJcunqj fcis siue ppetra? Aceciam vtlaga? si que in ipos magrffD (J custodes siue gar- dianos hiis occDonibj seu ea]^ aliqua fuin? |)mulga? ^ firmam pacem nram eis inde concedim) Ita tamen q8] stent recto in Cu? nra) si quis 93US eos loqui volui? de pmissis vel aliquo pmissojj £t insup pdonaviSi) remisiifD (J relaxaviin) eisdem magro d Custodib3 siue Gardianis catalla felonin) ^ fugitiuojjL catalla vtlagatoij Q: felonQ de se deodan9] thesaurum inventum vasta ^ impeticoes ac omnimoB] articulos itiiBis destru9es d ?nsgressionesde viridivel venaSoe vendiciones boscoi; infra fbrestas ^ ext" g: aliaij rcij quaijumcqj ante dcm) vicesiffi) prim) diem Februarij infra regnifD nrffi) Angt <^ March wall emer§ ^ euen? unde punicio caderet in demanB] debitam seu in finem Q: redempcoem aut in alias penas pecu- niarias seu in forisfcuram bono:; (J catallo^j aut imprisonamenta seu amciamenta Comitatum villaij vel singularia psonaij vel in ona)coem tibi ten) eoiji qui nunquam ?ngressi flierint vl heredum executojj vel ?re tortions, delicts, ignorances, con- tempts, concealments, forfeitures, and deceits done or committed by the said Master and Wardens or Guardians in any way whatsoever before the said aist day of Feb- ruary. Moreover if any sentences of outlawry were passed against the Master and Guardians or War- dens on these counts, or on any one of them, we also grant to them our assured peace therefrom. Pro- vided, however, that they appear in our Court, in case any man desire to witness against them con- cerning these or any one of them. And moreover we have pardoned, remitted, and released to the said Master and Wardens or Guardians the goods of felons and runaways, of outlaws and of those who have committed suicide, all deodands,' treasure trove, waste, exactions, and every kind of destruction of roads, transgressions against vert and venison, sales of wood within and without the forests, and of everything else whatsoever which occurred or happened within our kingdom of England and the Marches of Wales before the said a I St day of February, for which punishment might all in the form of fine or redemption or other punishment in money, or forfeiture of goods and chattels or imprison- ment, or in amercement of coun- ties, towns, or individuals, or in the burdening of freeholders of them who have never transgressed, or of heirs, executors or those who ' Drodand ; any object of property that had been the cause of the death of a man was originally forfeited to the Crown. releasing the "Drapers from Forfeitures 139 tenenciu) Escaetoij vicecomi? Coro- nato^j Q: aliojj huiusmodi ^ omeidq8| ad nos v'sus ip)os magrm) ^ custodes sive gardianos ptinet seu ptinere posset ex causis sup»d9is ac eciam pdonauiin)remisim)g: relaxauiffi) eis- dem magro ^ custodibj siue gardia- nis omimoB] doaa9oes aIiena9oes ^ pquisicoes p ipos de ?ris et ttn) de nob vel pgeiiitorib3 nris quondam Regibj Angl seu aliis nu^ de f 9o ^ non de iure Regibj Angt seu eo^j aliquo in capite tentis Ac oin'imo8| alieacoes pquisicoes ad manu mor- tuam fcas ^ hitas absqj licencia re- gia necnon omnimodi intrusiones ^ ingressus in temporalia archicpatus epatus abbie prioratus collegij hos- pital seu al?ius domus pie religiose seu ecclesiastice cuiuscunqj et in hereditatem suam in parte vcl in to- to post mortem pdecessoij suoij. (J an- tecessojj suojj absqj debita psecucoe libacoe seu restitu9oe eoijdem ext* manu regiam ante eundem vicessim) priin) diem Februarij fac? vna cum exitibj et pficuisinde medio tempore pceptis Et insuppdonauifn) remisim) 5 relaxauiffi) eisdem magf o ^ custo- dibj siue gardianis omimoBj penas ante diciS vicesiffi) priffi) diem Februarij forisfcas coram nob aut jjgenitoribj pdcis aut aliis nup vt pmitti? Regibj seu eojj aliquo aut consilio nro Caticellario The§ seu aliquibj siue aliquo judicum nroij vel ^genitojf pdcojj seu alio^ nup vt pmitti?RegumveI eorum alicuius p hold lands of escheators, sheriffs, coroners, and the like, and all such matters as refer or may refer to our dealings with the said Master and Guardians or Wardens rising out of the aforesaid matters. We also have pardoned, remitted, and released to the said Master and Guar- dians or Wardens all manner of grants, alienations, or receipts of lands and tenements held inchief of us or of our ancestors once Kings of England or of other lately in fact, though not by right, Kings of Eng- land or of any one of them, and all manner of alienations and receipts of lands in mortmain without the royal licence, as well as all intru- sions and entries before the said zist day of February into the tem- poralities of archbishop, bishop, abbot, prior, college, hospital, or of any other house, religious, pious, or ecclesiastical whatsoever, and into the lands inherited by them in part or whole after the death of their predecessors and ancestors, not being in the hands of the King, without due prosecution, release or restitution, together with all pro- ceeds and profits meanwhile re- ceived for them. And we also have pardoned, remitted, and released to the said Master and Wardens or Guardians all manner of penalties forfeited for any cause to us or to our aforesaid progenitors or to other late Kings as mentioned above or any of them, and to our Council, our chancellor, treasurer, or to any one of them or to any of our judges or the judges of the aforesaid our progenitors or of other Kings as above mentioned or z^o Letters Tatent of Richard III aliqua causa @; omes alias penas p ip)os magrin) (J custodes siue gar- dianos j) aliqua causa ante dcmvice- simu) primO diem Februarij nob vel ^genitoribj pdci§ aut aliis nup ut pmittiJRegibj seu eojj: alicui forisfcas ^ ad opus nrm leuan8| Ac omimo8| securitates pacis ante eundem vice- sim) primu diem Februarij siml? forisfcas necnon omimo8| escapia (J evasiones quojjcumqj felonum ^ cli- coj; conuictojj seu attinctojj ante eundem vicessiirD primu diem Feb- ruarij Aceciam ?cias ^ fcia^j ?cias omimodo^j prisonariojj. in guerra captoj^ nob vel pgenitoribj p)dci§ aut aliis^nup vt p^mitti? Regibj seu eojj alicui dc5 vicesimo primo die Februarij qualiJcunqj debi? pti- nentes siue spectaiD p eosdem magrifD Q: Custodes siue gardia- nos necnon omimo8| deman&| tr^- gressiones ofFensas contemptus me- sprisiones ^ impeticoes f) ipos magrifD ^ custodes siue gardianos ante vicesiin) primu diem Februarij cont* formam tam quoijcunqj sta- tutojj. ordiiiacionu 5 pvisionu f Dtojj siue editojj de pquisiBbj accepta- cioibj leccoibj publicacoibj notifi- caciobj (J execuciobj quibuscumqj quajjicunqj Irajj Q: bidla^jL aplicaij (J omim alioj^L statutojj ordinaconum 5 puision) pJtextu quojj aliqua secta v'sus eosdem magiS) ^ custodes siue gardianos p billam vel p bre de p'munire fac? seu alio modo quo- cunq5 p aliqua mat'ia ante d9m vices- simu primu diem februarij fac? lieri any of them for any cause, and all other penalties to be levied at our need forfeited by the said Master and Guardians or Wardens for any cause before the said xist day of February to us or to our progenitors aforesaid or other late Kings as above mentioned or to any of them, and allmannerof securities of peace similarly forfeited before the said iist day of February, as well as all manner of escapes and evasions of any felons and convicted or attaint- ed clerics before the said xist day of February. Also the thirds and ninths'of all prisoners taken in war, owing to us or to the aforesaid our ancestors or to other late Kings as mentioned above, which were owing by the said Master and Guardians or Wardens. Also all manner of demands, transgressions, offences, contempts, misprisions, and exac- tions made by the said Master and Guardians or Wardens before the xist day of February, against the tenure of any Statute, ordinance, and provision made or published, whether concerning receipts, ac- ceptances, readings, pubUcations, notifications or execution of any manner of letters and bulls aposto- lical, or (against the tenure of) any other Statutes or ordinances or provisions by pretext of which any suit had been made against the said Master and Guardians or Wardens by bill or writ de praemunire or by any other action brought or whioi may be brought for any act done before the ust day of February, as ' A third of a man's money value, estimated according to his rank, was the usual fee paid for his ransom. releasing the Drapers from Forfeitures z^^i valea? q^m quo:jLcunq3 alioij statutoij fee? siue ppetra? ante 3)cm vicesimu primudiemfebruarijStatutisordina- cioibj ^ p''visionib3 illis non obstan- tib3 Ac eciam pdonaviin) ^ remisiifD ^relaxauiin) eisdem magro custodibj siue gardianis omimo&j fines adiu- dicatos ainlciamenta exi? forisfcos releuia scutagia ac omimoda debita compota pstita arreragia firmajj ^ compotoij nob vel pgenitorib3 p)dci§ aut aliis nup vt p)mitti? Re- gibj seueorum alicui ante festum Sci Michis anno regni Regis Edwardi quarti vicesimo s9d3 quali^cumqj debi? siue ptinen) necnon ominio£>| accoes execucoes impeticoes que- relas 5 deman8| quas nos eojus vel nos conjunctim cu aliis psonis vel alia psona hcni seu Bere po?iin) v§us ipos magim ^ custodes siue gardianos p aliquib5 huiusmodi finibj amciamentis exi? reJeviis scu- tagiis debitis compotis pstitis ^ arreragiis ante dcm) festum sci micfeis nob vel pgenitoribj p)dcls aut aliis nup vt p)mitti? Regibj seu ecjj alicui debi? aceciam vtlaga? in ip)os magin) Q: custodes siue gar- dianos pmulga? p aliqua causajjL supdcajj Proviso semp quod presens pdonacio nra) se non extendat ad aliquos magnos computantes qui nunc sunt vel qui nup fiierunt videlt ad maiorem ^ societatem Stapule ville nfe Cales aut maiorem Con- stabulariQ ^ Societatem Stapule nfe pdce Thes^ Cales^ ^ hospicij nri vel pgenitojj nfojj aut alioij nuper vt p)mitti? Regum seu eoijL alicuius vitella? Cales Cama? well as any other suit brought in virtue of any other Statute before the said 21st day of February, any Statute or ordinances notwithstand- ing. We also have pardoned and remitted and released to the said Master and Wardens or Guardians all fines adjudged, amercements, profits, forfeitures, reliefs, scutages and all manner of debts, composi- tions, payments, arrears of ferms and compositions due to us or our predecessors aforesaid or to other late Kings as mentioned above or to any one of them before the Feast of St. Michael in the zznd year of King Edward IV in any way due or pertaining, and also all manner of actions, executions, suits, claims and demands that we alone or con- jointly with other persons or other person have or may have against the said Master and Guardians or War- dens for any such above-mentioned fines, amercements, payments, re- liefs, scutages, dues, compositions and arrears due to us or our aforesaid progenitors or other late Kings as mentioned above. Also outlawries pronounced against the said Master and Wardens or Guardians for any of the above-mentioned causes. Pro- vided always that our present par- don does not extend to any great Renders of Account which are or have been of"late, viz. to the Mayor and Society of the Staple of our town of Calais, or the Mayor, Constable, and Society of oiu- above- named Staple the Treasurers of Calais and of our Court as of our progenitors or other late Kings as mentioned above or any one of them ; to the Victualler of Calais, 1 1 142, Letters Tatent of Richard III nfos Cest? North Wall Q: Suth WaH Custodes Garderobe hospicij nri vel pgenitoiji nrojj aut aliojj nup vt p)mitti? Regum seu eojj alicuius aut Custodes siue clicos magne Garderobe nfe vel pgenitojj nrojji aut alio)j nup vt p)mittif Regum seu eojjL alicuius clicos siue Custodes Hanapij Cancella? nfe qui nunc sunt aut nup fuerunt vel executores vel administratores bonojjL (| cattal- lojj eojjdem clicoiji siue Custodum vel eojj alicuius clicos operacionu nraajL vel |)genito)ji nroi^ aut alioij nup vt p)mitti? Regum vel eojjL alicuius The§ ?re nfe Hibnie Q: Receptores ducatus nfi Lancast? ^ ducatus nri Cornub tarn gerSales qm particulares quo ad aliqua huius- modi ofEcia sua seu huiusmodi oc- cupacoes suas aut alicuius eo!j,dem tangencia In cuius rei testimoniu has Iras nras fieri feci in) patentes Teste me ipo apud Westin) vicesimo primo die Maij anno regni nfi primo. p ip)m Regem Sharp. our Chamberlains of Chester, North and South Wales, the keepers of the wardrobe of our Court or those of our progenitors or late Kings as before mentioned or any one of them i to the keepers or clerks of our great wardrobe or that of our pro- genitors or of the other late Kings as above mentioned or of any one of them j to the present or late keepers of the hanaper of our chancery or executors or administrators of the goods and chattels of the said clerks or keepers or any one of them, or clerks of our works or of our pro- genitors or of others of the late Kings as above mentioned ; to the treasurer of our lands of Ireland and the receivers of our Duchy of Lancaster and the receivers of our Duchy of Cornwall as well general as particular so far as concerns any oflSce of theirs, or of any of them, of this kind. In testimony whereof we have caused these our letters patent to be made, witness myself at Westminster the xist day of May in the first year of our reign. By the King himself. Sharp. XVII THE OATH BOOK OR BOOK OF ORDINANCES, NO. y^y. The Oath Book, or Book of Ordinances, was written in the year r4(fo, and added to subsequently. It contains the earliest ordinances of 1407, drawn up in the reign of Henry IV ; those of the sixth year of Henry V, 14.18, with additions made in the reigns of Henry VI, Edward IV, Henry VII, and Henry VIII ; accompanied by a few alterations made up *° t'^e year iy5o. It is a folio volume 14^ inches high and ic^ inches wide, bound in wooden boards ^ of an inch thick, covered with brown Book of Ordinances 245 leather, each cover being protected by four iron corner pieces with bosses • the book was once fitted with metal clasps, the hasps of which remain. The decoration consists of a plain border one inch wide formed by blind tooled lines, and within it an inner border of a stamped pattern, on which, and on the lines immediately enclosing it, traces of original gilding still remain. In the centre of the cover is a stamped panel a J inches high by i.| inches wide, consisting of a hatched border within which is a design, also hatched, resembling a knot, with two upper and two lower loops j there is no trace of gilding on the panel. The decoration of the back cover is the same as that of the front. The volume has in recent years been very clumsily rebacked in calf which is already perishing. The interior of the book is for the most part in good preservation, con- sidering its constant use in the past for swearing in new officials, reading ordinances to the Company at the Quarter Day Courts, and general reference. It contains 6% leaves of vellum, and appears from the following i note by the Clerk at the top of the first page to have possessed at one time IX more leaves: — 'the xxj*'> daye of October anno regni regis Henrici viij xxxviij° I pervsed this boke agaynste my fErst quarter daye I kept, & I fFownd lackyng which wez (was) cutt out of thys boke before I cam in offyce xij levys of parchement, per me William Bere.' On the same page are the Arms of the Company without crest or supporters, and some notes in Latin of the dates of the deaths and accessions of the Tudor sovereigns. The Arms are evidently a later insertion, because the crowns are represented with arches as if they were royal crowns as they are found in the grant of James I.^ Pages a-j contain a list of fourteen obits commencing with that of Henry V, the others being those of Drapers, with the dates when they were held and the obligations for the attendance of the Company. On page 4. are particulars of the quit-rent due from property in the parish of St, Mary Bothaw given to the Com- pany .'by Henry Fitz Ailwin the first "Lord mayor" of London'.'' Then, following six blank pages, comes the following Calendar jj which is printed in black and red with illuminated initial letters : ^ Cf. Appendix, Grant of Arms, vol. i. No. XI. = As to the claim of Fitzalwyn to have been a Draper, cf. p. 7 J, and Appendix, vol. i, No, VIII. He certainly was not Lord Mayor. This is a later title. 244 "^^^ Oath Book or KIL llj A b iiii N' xj c iii N' d ii N' xix e Nonas viij f viii Id' g vii Id' xvj A vi Id' V b v Id' c iiii Id' xiij d iii Id' ij e ii Id' f Idus X g xix Kl' A xviij Kl' xviij b xvij Kl' vij c xvj Kl' d XV Kl' XV e xiiii Kl' iiij f xiii Kl' g xij Kl' xij A xj Kl' i b x Kl' c ix Kl' ix d viij KP e vij Kl' xvij f vi Kl' vi g V Kl' A iiii Kl' xiiij b iii Kl' iij c ii Kl' Prima dies mensis : et septima truncat ut ensis. lanuarius habet dies .xxxj. luna .xxx. Circumcisio domini. Mynus duplex. .ix. lee. Octaua sancti stephani. .iij. lee. Octaua sancti iohannis apostoli et euangeliste. .iij. lee. Octaua sanctorum Innocencium martyrum. .iij. lec. Octaua sancti thome martyrh et Sjrased\ sancti edwardi regis. Epyphania domini. Principale duplex. .ix. lec. Sancti luciani presbiteri sociorumque eius martyrum. Octaua epyphanie. ix. lec. med. lec. de sancto hylario. Februarij. Sancti felicis presbiteri et martyris. .iij. lec. Sancti mauri abbatis. .iij. lec. Sancti marcelli fape [erased^ et martiris. .iij. lec. Sancti sulpicij episcopi et confessoris. .iij. lec. Sancte prisce uirginis et martiris. .iij. lec. Sancti Wlstani episcopi et confessoris. .ix. lec. Sanctorum fabiani et sebastiani martyrum. .ix. lec. Sancte agnetis uirginis et martyris. .ix. lec. Sancti vincentij martyris. .ix. lec. Conuersio sancti pauli. Memoria de sancto preiecto martyre. inuit. triplex. .ix. lec. Sancti luliani episcopi et confessoris. .iii. lec. Sancte agnetis secundo, .iij. lec. Sancte batildis regine uirginis non martyris. .iij. lec. ^ Nox habet boras .xvj. dies uero .viij. Book of Ordinances 145- KjL d xi e xix f iiij N' iii N' viii g A ii N' Nonas xvi b viij Id' V c d xiij e ii f g x A b vij Id' vj Id' V Id' iiij Id' iij Id' ij Id' Id us sviij c vij d e XV f iiij g A xvij ^ Kl' xvj - Kl' xiiij Kl' xiij Kl' xij Kl' xi Kl' xij b i c X Kl' ix Kl' d ix e f viij Kl' vij Kl' vj Kl' xvii g vi A b V Kl' iiij Kl' iii Kl' xiiij c ii Kl' ' Miaginal == sk MS. Quarta subit mortem prosternit tercia fortem. Februarius habet dies .xxviij. luna .xxix. Sancte brigide uirginis non martyris.' .iii. lee. Purificacio beate marie, maius duplex. .ix. lee. Sancti blasij episcopi et martiris. Inuit. duplex. .iij. lee. Sancte agathe uirginis et martyris. .ix. lee. Sanetorum uedasti et amandi episeoporum et con- fessorum. .iij. lee. Sancte scolastiee uirginis non martyris. .iii. lee. Sancti ualentini martyris. Marcij. .iij. lee. luliane uirginis et martyris. Inuit. duplex, .iij. lee. \ yemps finitur. Ultima septuagesime. Cathedra sancti petti. Inuit. triplex. .ix. lee. Sedit yemps retro : cathedrato symone petro. Mathie apostoli. Inferius duplex, locus bysexti. .ix. lee. Si bisextus fuerit : quarta die a cathedra. Sancti petri fiat festum mathie et .f. littera. ^ bis numeretur. •ff Nox habet horas .xiiij. dies uero .x. note in a. later hand : Incepcio regni regis E. vj''. z^6 The Oath Book or "TT'T? Primus mandentem disrumpit quarta bibentem. | \ 1 ^ Martius habet dies .xxxj. luna .xxx. iij d iSi' Sancti dau'tt episcofi et confessoris. padded in another handX e vj N' Sancti Cedde episcopi et confessoris. \added in another xi f V N' g iiij N' xix A iii N' viij b ii N' c Nonas Sanctaram perpetue et felicitatis uirginum et mar- tyrum. .iij. lee. xvj d viij Id' V e vij Id' f vj Id' xiij g V Id' Sancti Gregorij pape. ^erasedj ij A iiij Id' Sancti Gregorij pape. [erased] h iii Id' x c ii Id' ^ Post istum locum non potest esse iniciutn quadragesime. d Idus xviij e xvij Kl' Aprilis. ^ Claues pasche. vii f xvj Kl' g XV Kl' Sancti edwardi regis et martyris. Sol in ariete. .ix. lee. XV A xiiij Kl' iiij b xiij Kl' Sancti Cuthberti et confessoris. .ix. lee. c xij Kl' Sancti benedieti abbatis. .ix. lee. Equinoceium ymale. xij d xi Kl' ^ Primum paseha. i e x Kl' f ix Kl' ix g viij Kl' Annunciacio dominica.' A vij Kl' [some -word erased here] xvij b vi Kl' Resureccio domini. vj c V Kl' d iiii Kl' xiiij e iii Kl' iii f ii Kl' \ Nox habet horas .xij. dies uero .xij. ' Marg. note In a later hand : Memorandum. Incepcio ab Incarnacione domini nostri Ihesu christi. w JXl -f g xi A iiii N' b iii N' xix c ii N' viij d Nonas xvj e V f g xiij A ij b viij Id' vij Id' vj Id' V Id' iiii Id' c iii Id' X d ii Id' e Idus xviij f vij g A XV b xviij Kl' xvij Kl' xvj Kl' XV Kl' iui c d xij e i f xiiij Kl' xiij Kl' xij Kl' xj Kl" g X Kl'= ix A ix Kl' b xvij c viij Kl' vij Kl' vj d e vj Kl' V Kl' xiiij f iij g A iiij Kl' iii Kl' ii Kl' Book of Ordinances 247 Denus et undenus : est mortis uulnere plenus. Aprilis habet dies .xxx. luna .xxx. Sancti ricardi episcopi et confessoris. .ix. lee. Sancti ambrosij episcopi et confessoris. Inferius duplex. .ix. lee. ^ .iij. lec. Maij. Sanctorum tiburcij et ualeriani martyrum. ^ Claues rogacionum. ^ Sol in tauro. Sancti alphegi episcopi et martyris. .iij. Jec. Sancti georgij martyris. cum regi[mi]ne chori. .iij. lec, Marci euangeliste. Inferius duplex. letania maior. Ultimum pascha. Uitalis martyris. cum regimine chori. .iij. lec. Saxai Erkenwaldi episcopi et confessoris. \added in another hand^ ^ Nox habet horas .x. dies uero .xiiij. ' Note in a later hand : H. vij. obijt 21° huius mensis. ^ Marg. note, in a later hand, but not same as the (receding note : Incepcio regni regis H. viij"'. 14.8 The Oath Book or KF, xj b N' c vj N' xix d V N' viij e iiii N' f iii N' xvj g ii N' V A Nonas b viij Id' xiij c vii Id' ii d vj Id' e V Id' X f iiii Id' g iii Id' xviij A ii Id' vij b Idus c xvij Kl' XV d xvj Kl' iiij e XV Kl' f xiiij Kl' xij g xiii Kl' i A xij Kl' b xi Kl' ix c X Kl' d ix Kl' xvij e viij Kl' vi f vij Kl' g vj Kl' xiiij A V Kl' iii b iiii Kl' c iii Kl' xj d ii Kl' Tercius occidit et Septimus ora relidit. Maius habet dies .xxxj. luna .xxx. Apostolorum philippi et lacobi. Inferius duplex. •ix. lee. Inuencio sancte crucis. Memoria de sancto alexandro. Sancti lohannis ante portam latinam. inuit. triplex. .iij. lee. Sancti lohannis episcopi de beuerlaco. Sanctorum gordiani et epimachi martyrum. .iij. lee. Sanctorum nerei achillei atque pancracij martyrum. .iij. kc. lunij. ^ Sol in geminis. Sancti dunstani archiepiscopi confessoris. Memoria de sancta potentiana. .ix. lee. Ver finitur. Uer fugit urbanus estatem simphorianus. Sancti aldelmi episcopi et confessoris. .ix. lee. med. lee. de sancto urbano. Sancti augustini primi anglorum. .ix. lee. Sancti germani episcopi et confessoris. .iij. lee. Sancte petronelle uirginis. ^ Nox habet horas .viij. dies uero .xvj. Book of Ordinances 249 TV^T? Denus psallescit : quindenus federa nescit. J^J J lunius habet dies .xxx. luna .xxix. e Sancti nichomedis martyris. .iij. lee. xix f iiii N' Sanctorum marcellimi et petri martyrum. Inuit. duplex. .iij. lee. viij g iii N' xvj A ii N' V b Nonas Sancti bonefacij sociorutnque eius martyrum. lee. Inuit duplex. c viij Id'' xiij d vii Id' ^ .iij. lee. ii e vi Id' Sanctorum medardi et gildardi episcoporum et con- fessorum. f V Id' Translacio sancti edmundi. .ix. lee. Memoria et med. lee. ^ de martyribus primo et felieiano. X g iiii Id' A iii Id' Sancti bemabe apostoli. .ix. lee. xviij b ii Id' Sanctorum basilidiseirininaborisetna[zarii]. .iij. lee. vij c Idus d xviij IQ' Sancti basilij episcopi et eonfessoris. lulij. .iij. lee. XV e xvij Kl' Sanctorum uiti et modesti et crescencie martyrum. .iij. lee. iiij f xvj Kl' Translacio sancti riuci [x/V ilf5.jp/oyricardi] episcopi. .ix. lee. Med. lee. de saneto cirico. g XV Kl' ^ Sol in cancro. xij A xiiij Kl' Sanctorum marei et marcelliani martyrum. Inuit. .iij. lee. i b xiij Kl' Sanctorum geruasii et prothasij martyrum. Inuit. duplex. .iij. lee. e xii Kl' Translacio sancti edwardi regis et martyris. .ix. lee. ix d xi Kl' e X Kl' Sancti albini martyris. .ix. lee. xvij f ix KJ' Sancte ethe[l]drede uirginis non martyris. .iij. lee. Uigilia. vi g viij Kl' Natiuitas sancti iohannis baptiste.'^ .ix. lec, A vij Kl' xiiii b vi Kl' Sanctorum Iohannis et pauli martyrum. .iij. lec. iii e V Kl' d iiii Kl' Sancti leonis pa^e [erased] et eonfessoris. Uigilia. .iij. lec. xi e iii Kl' Apostolorum Petri et pauli. .ix. lec. f ii Kl' Commemoracio sancti pauli. .ix. lee. ^ Nox habet horas .vj. dies uero .xviij. ' Mote In a /ater hand: Rex E. vj"^ moriebatur anno regni sui 7°. ^ Marginal note in later hand : coronacio H. Regis viij'. Anno I J 09. ifinq. 1 K K zfo The Oath Book or Tresdecimus mactat. lulij denus labefecta. lulius habet dies .xxxj. luna ,xxx. Octaua sancti iohannis baptiste. Inuit. duplex. .iii. lee. Sanctorum processi et martiniani. .iij. lee. Inuit. duplex. Memoria de sancto swithuno. translacio et ordinacio sancti martini episcopi et con- fessoris. ^ .ix. lee. medie lee. de apostolis. Octaua apostolorum petri et pauli. .ix. lee. .ix. lee. Sanctorum septem fratrum martyrum. Inuit. duplex. .iij. lee. translacio sancti benedicti abbatis. .ix. lee. Sanete mildrede virginis non martyris. ^ Dies caniculares incipiunt. translacio sancti swithuni episcopi sociorumque eius. con. \s'tc\ .ix. lee. Augusti.i Sancti kenelmi regis et martyris. Inuit. duplex. .iij. lee. Saneti arnulphi episcopi et martyris. ^ Sol in leone. .iij. lee. Sanete margarete uirginis et martyris.' Sanete praxedis uirginis non martyris. Sanete marie magdalene. Inuit. triplex. memoria sancti wandregesili. Sanete appollinaris episcopi et martyris. Sanete ehristine uirginis et martyris. Uigilia. Sancti iacobi apostoli.^ .ix. lee. Sanete anne matris marie. .ix. lee. Sanctorum septem dormiencium martyrum. .iij. lee. Sancti sampsonis episcopi et confessoris. .iij. lee. .iij. lee. Sanctorum feliei simplieij faustini et beatricis mar- tyrum. .iij. lee. Sanctorum abdon et sennes martyrum. Inuit. duplex. .iij. lee. Saneti germani episcopi et confessoris. .iij. lee. ^ Nox habet horas .viij. dies uero .xvj. _' Marginal note added In a different hand: iJJJ- Inceptio Regine Marie Anno prirao. " Marginal note added in a different hand: 15^4. Philippus nuptus fuit Regine Marie et ideo scriptum postea annis regnorum j". et z". et deinde similiter etc. quia fiiit in anno ij° regine supradicte. xix g KT', N' viij A vj N' b xvj c V N' iiii N' V d e xiii f ij g A X b iii N' ii N' Nonas viij Id' vij Id' vi Id' c xviij d vij e f XV g V Id' uij Id' iii Id' ij Id' Idus iiii A b xvij Kl' xvj Kl' xij c XV Kl' i d e ix f g xiiij Kl' xiij Kl' xij Kl' xj Kl' xvij A vj b X Kl' ix Kl' c xiiij d iii e f viij Kl' vij Kl' vj Kl' V Kl' xi g iiii Kl' xix A iii Kl' b ii Kl' .ix. lee. .iij. .ix. lee, lee, .iij. •iij- lee, lee. Book of Ordinances %S^ KT viu,e xvjj d iiij N' V e iii N' f ii N' xiii g Nonas ij A viii Id' b vij Id' X c vi Id' d xviij e vij f g XV A iiij b V Id' iiij Id' iij Id' ii Id' Idus xix Kl' c xviii Kl' xij d xvij Kl' i e xvj Kl' f XV Kl' ix g xiiij Kl' A xiij Kl' xvij b xij Kl' vj e xi Kl' d x Kl' xiiij e ix Kl' iij f viij Kl' g vii Kl' xj A vi Kl' xix b V Kl' e iiii Kl' viij d iii Kl' e ii Kl' Prima neeat fbrtem perditque secunda cohortem. Augustus habet dies .xxxj. luna .xxix. Ad vincula sancti petri. .ix. lec. Sancti stephani pape [erased] et martyris. Inuit. duplex. .iij. lec. Inuencio sancti stephani prothomartyris. .ix. lec. lec. Sancti oswaldi regis et martyris. Inuit. duplex. .iij Sanctorum sixti felicissimi et agapiti martyrum. •iii. lec Sancti donati episcopi et martyris. Sancti ciriaci sociorumque eius martyrum duplex. Sancti romani martyris. iij. lec. Uigilia. Sancti laurencij martyris. Sancti tyburcij martiris. Sancti ypoliti sanctorumque eius martyrum. Septembris. Sancti eusebij eonfessoris. Uigilia. .iij. lee. Inuit. .iii. lec. .ix. .iij. lec. lec. .iii. iij. lec. lec. Assumpcio beate marie uirginis. .ix. lec. Octaua sancti laurencij. Sancti agapiti martyris. Sancti magni martyris. ^ Sol in uirgine. Octaua Assumpcionis beate marie virginis.* .ix. lec. Sanctorum timothei et appollinaris martyrum, .iij. lec. Uigilia. Sancti bertholomei. apostoli. .ix. lec. Sancti ruphi martyris. Inuit. duplex. Sancti augustini episcopi et doctoris. Decollacio sancti lohannis baptiste. Sanctorum felicis et adaucti martyrum. .iij. lec. .ix. lec. .ix. lec. Inuit. duplex, .iij. lec. ^ Nox habet horas .x. dies uero .xiiij. Margmal note in a later hand : Anno primo Hentici vij. x^-x The Oath Book or KIL Tercia septembris : et denus fert mala membris. September habet dies .xxx, luna .xxx. Sancti egidij abbatis. .ix. lee. translacio sancti cuthberti [episcopi] et confessoris. .ix. lec. Sancti bertini abbatis. .iii. lec. Natiuitas beate marie uirginis. .iij. lec. Sancti gorgonij martyris. Sanctorum prothi et iacincti martyrum. memoria tantum. ^ cornelio et cypriano. Octobris. Exaltacio sancte crucis .ix. lec. Octaua natiuitatis beate marie. .ix. lec. \ Medie lec. de sancto luciano. Sancti lamberti episcopi et martyris. sol in libra. .iij. lec. ^ Equinoccium auctumnale. Uigilia. Sancti mathei apostoli. et euangeliste.'' .ix. lec. Sancti mauricij sociorumque eius. martyrum. .ix. lec. Sancte tecle uirginis. .iij. lec. Sancti firmini episcopi et martyris. .iij. lec. Sancti cipriani episcopi et iustine uirginis et martyris. .iij. lec. Sanctorum cosme et damiani martyrum. .iij. lec. Sancti michaelis archangeli. .ix. lec. Sancti leromini presbiteri et doctoris. .ix. lec. ^ Nox habet horas .xij. dies uero .xij. ' Marginal note in a different hand : Eleccio vicecomitis londoniensis. ^ Marginal note : Eleccio vicecomitis londoniensis, written -very faintly^ frobably has been erased. ' Marginal note in a different hand : luracio vicecomitis londoniensis. Eleccio Maioris presenti vicecomite londoniensi. xvi f N' V g iiij N" A iii N' xiii b ii N' ij c nonas d viij Id' X e vij Id' f vj Id' xviij g V Id' vij A iiij Id' b iii Id' XV c ii Id' iiij d Idus e xviij Kl' xij f xvij Kl' i g xvj Kl' A XV Kl' ix b xiiij Kl' c xiij Kl' xvij d xij Kl' vi e xi Kl' f X Kl' xiiij g ix Kl' iij A viij Kl' b vij Kl' xi c vi Kl' xix d V Kl' e iiii Kl'' viij f iii Kl' g ii Kl' KL Book of Ordinances 15-3 Tercius et denus est : sicut mors alienus. October habet dies .xxxi. luna .xxix. Sancti remigij. g[ermani] episcoporum. .ix. lee. Sancti leodegarij episcopi et martyris. .iii. lec. Sancte fidis uirginis et martyris. .iij. lec. Sanctorum marci marcelli et apulei martyrum. .iij. lec. Sanctorum dionisij. rustici et eleutherii martyrum. .ix. lec. Sancti gereonis sociorumque eius martyrum. .iij. lec. Sancti nigasij sociorumque eius martyrum. .iij. lec. Sancte alburge uirginis. Translacio sancti edwardi regis et confessoris.' .ix. lec. Sancti kalixti/a/'e [erased^ et martyris. Inuit. duplex. .iij. lec. Sancti wlfrarmi episcopi et confessoris. .ix. lec. Nouembris. Sancti michaelis in monte tumba. .ix. lec. Sancti luce euangeliste. ix. lec. ^ Sol in scorpione. Sanctarum undecim milia uirginum. .iij. lec. Sancti romani episcopi et confessoris. .iij. lec. Sanctorum crispini et crispiniani martyrum. .iij. lec. Uigilia. Apostolorum symonis et lude. .ix. lec. Sancti Quintini martyris. Uigilia. .iij. lec. ^ Nox habet horas .xiiij. dies uero .x. ' Atarpnal note in a later hand, and crossed out : Eleccio Maioris. ^ Marginal note in a later hand : luracio Maioris londoniensis present' Maioris lond'. xvj V xiij ij A b c d vj N' V N' iiii N' e iii N' X f ii N' g nonas xviij vii A b viij Id' vij Id' XV c d vj Id' V Id' iiii e f iiij Id' iii Id' xij g ii Id' i A Idus b xvij Kl' ix c d xvj Kl' XV Kl' xvij vi e f xiiij Kl' xiii Kl' g xii Kl' xiiij A xi Kl' iij b c X Kl' ix Kl' xi d viii Kl' xix e f vij Kl' vi Kl' viij i V Kl' iiii Kl'^ xvj V b c iii Kl' ii Kl' zf/\. The Oath Book or KL Scorpius est quintus : et tercius est nece cinctus. Nouember habet dies .3cxx. luna .xxx, Festiuitas omnium sanctorum. Maius duplex, .ix. lee. Commemoracio omnium fidelium defunctorum. .ix. lee. Sancte wenefride virginis et martyris. Sancti leonardi abbatis. .ix. lee. Sanctorum quatuor coronatorum martyrum. Inuit. duplex. .iij. lee. Sancti theodori martyris. .iij, lee. Sancti martini episcopi et confessoris. .ix. lec. Sancti bricij episcopi et confessoris. .iij. lee. Sancti Erkenwaldi.' Sancti machuti episcopi et confessoris. .ix. lec. Deposicio sancti edmundi archiepiscopi et confessoris. .ix. lec. Sancti hugonis episcopi et confessoris.^ .ix. lec. Octaua sancti martini. Inuit. duplex. .iij. lec. Sancti edmundi regis et martyris. .ix. lec. Sancte cecilie uirginis et martyris. .ix. lec. Sancti dementis /^/le \erased'\ et martyris. .ix. lec. Sancti grisogoni martyris. yemps incipit. Sancte katerine uirginis et martyris. .ix. lec. Sancti lini pape [erased"] et martyris. .iii. lee. ^ Primus dies aduentus domini. Sanctorum saturnini et sisinnij martyrum. vigilia. .iij. lec. V e ii Kl' Sancti andree apostoli. inferius duplex. .ix. lee. ^ Nox habet horas .xvj. dies uero .viij. ' Marginal note in a later hand : episcopi et confessoris. '' Marginal note in a later hand : Regina maria moriebatur eodem [die] incepit domina Elizabetha regnare. Marginal note in a later hand : I J 57. this day sir The. Cuiteys made Knight. d N' xiij e iiii N' ij f iii N' g ii N' X A nonas b xviij c vij d viij Id' vij Id' vi Id' e V Id' XV f iiii Id' iiij g A iii Id' ii Id' xii b Idus i c xviii Kl' d ix e xvij Kl' xvj Kl' f XV Kl' xvij g vi A b xiiij c iij d e xiiij Kl' xiij Kl' xij Kl' xj Kl' X Kl' ix Kl' xi f xix g A viij Kl' vij Kl' vi Kl' viii b V Kl' c iiii Kl'3 xvj d iii Kl' 3 KT Xllj Book of Ordinances zys Septimus exanguis : uirosus denus ut anguis. December, habet dies .xxxj. luna .xxix. Sancte barbare virginis et martyris.' Sancti nicholai episcopi et confessoris, .ix. lee. Octaua sancti andree apostoli. Inuit. duplex. ,iij. lee. Concepcio sancte marie. Minus duplex. .ix. lee. Sancte lucie uirginis. et martiris. .ix. lee. lanuarij. O sapiencia. Nulle deinceps fiant preces ad vesperas. ^ Sol in capricormo [«V]. UigiJia. Sancti thome apostoli. .ix. lee. Uigilia. Natiuitas domini nostri ihesu christi. principale. .ix. Jec. Sancti stephani prothomartyris. .ix. lee. Sancti lohannis apostoli et euangeliste. .ix. lee. Sanctorum Innocencium martyrum. .ix. lee. XSancti Thome arch'tephcopi et martyris erased] .ix. lee. Sancti siluestri episcopi et confessoris. .ix. lee. ^ Nox habet horas .xviij. dies uero .vj. ' Sancti osmundi. Samm : added in a later hand, but not the same as that of the marginal notes. f N' ij g iiij N' A iii N' X b ii N' c nonas xviij d viij Id' vij e vij Id' f vi Id' XV g V Id' iiij A iiij Id' b iij Id' xij c ii Id' i d Idus e xix Kl' ix f xviij Kl' g xvij Kl' xvii A xvj Kl' vi b XV Kl' c xiiij Kl' xiiij d xiij Kl' iii e xij Kl' f xj Kl' xi g X Kl' xix A ix Kl' b viij Kl' viij c vij Kl' d vi Kl' xvj e V Kl' V f iiii Kl' g iii Kl' xiii A ii Kl' xy6 The Oath Booh or The Calendar is an ordinary Sarum Calendar adapted to the use of London by the subsequent insertion of the feasts of St. Erconwald (April 30 and November 14.) and St. Mildred (July 13).' Its date can be approximately determined, from internal evidence, as lying somewhere between 1389 and 141 y. In the first place we find the festival of St. Anne (July 1.6) mentioned, and she was rarely inserted in the Sarum Calendar before 1389. On the other hand, the names of St. David (March i), St. Chad (March a), and St. Winifred (November 3) are added in a different and later hand, and these were not always inserted in the Sarum Calendar after 141 5. Inasmuch, however, as on the first leaf of the book the obit of Henry V, who died in 1422., is given, it seems most probable that the Calendar was written after the death of Henry IV, 141 3. This would fix its date somewhere between 141 3 and 141 5:. There is, however, no proof that the first four leaves were originally connected with the Calendar, and if not, the date of the latter may be some time not earlier than 1389. Ill The two next pages, which face each other, have beautiful illuminated borders with a delicate floral design. Within these borders there are two pictures. On the left-hand page the Virgin stands surrounded with a golden halo and crowned with the Triple Crown of the Trinity. At her feet are a group of persons probably representing the Drapers. On each side of her there are two angels. Above her, two figures apparently representing the Almighty and the Virgin, possibly to indicate the Assumption. In the upper corners on either side are the Royal Arms and the Arms of the Company. The Triple Crown should be compared with those on the Grant of Arms, 143 9. Cf. Appendix, vol. i. No. XI. Under the Virgin is found — The Oath of a Brother. ' Ye schal swere and be hete that Duryng your lyve to be good and Treiu lelgman vnto our souerayne lord the king & his successours kings " and fethfuU & loueyng to the fraternite of our lady & to the feliship of Draperes of london. Ye shal paye & be Contributarye to almaner somances of the Mayster & Wardens therof now beyng & her successours Maysters & Wardens that for the tyme to com shal be or ellis pay the ^ St. Erconwald is also an East Anglian saint, and St. Mildred was honoured at Canterbury. ^^ The words printed in italics are inserted as additions in the original manu- script. The words in brackets are the original words which have oeen subse- quently struck out. Booh of Ordinances 15-7 peynis & mercementes thereoute. Ye shal be comparcioner and to your power bere al maner Costis & chargis of the said fraternite or feliship. Ye shal enplete no brother of the seyd fraternite or . . . (standyng) free in the seid feliship beyng suffisaunt & abydyng And standyng vnder (Rule theiof) for Any Cause in any Corte sperytual or Temporal but yf ye have leue of the Mayster or Wardens or her successors Maysters or Wardens that for the tyme to Com shul be The conseyles of the seyd ffelishipp Onest and leful ye shall Conseyll and kepe preve to alle Causes & maters for the Wele and Worschipp of the seyd fFraternite When ye be called ther to ye shuU shewe you' Good avys & Connyng And yf ye knowe at Any tyme (any)thing which shuld be preyudice slavnder or Comon hurte to The ffelishipp be you' Power ye shall lette yt or ellis anoon the Mayster or oon of the Wardens ye shul Warne or do be Warnyd ye shal also hile and kepe the Conseill of youre Maister And all other Ruh's and ordinances made or in tyme comyng to be made among the seid ffraternite and ffelishippe ye shal observe And kepe So helpe you God and Halidom And be This Bcoke.' The right-hand page contains a picture of Christ on the cross with the Virgin and St. John standing on each side, and at the four corners the four Evangelists represented by their symbols, the Lion, the Calf, the Face of a Man, and the Flying Eagle. In the floral border on either side are the Royal Arms and the Arms of the Company. The extracts from the Four Gospels which should follow the illuminations are wanting, and probably formed a portion of the ' xij levys ' noted by William Bere as missing in 1 54.(f . These tw o beautiful pages have unfortunately been seriously injured by damp, which has caused the colours on either side to come ott on the other, thus spoiling each picture.' Following the illuminated leaves are ' The othe of the Master and IV Wardens ioyntely' inserted on a fly-leaf, and other regulations con- cerning those officers, written by various hands, apparently between lyoo and 1^60.'' Against the Oath and the order respecting leases the instruction is 'Lege'.^ Then follow two abrogated orders which are ciossed through with the pen, having the direction in the margin 'ne legas quia vacat '. They are as follows : (i) (Also yt ys Enacted that the Rentor Wardeyn Electyd which ys the thyrde Warden Shall yerely put in Swerties for hys Accompt within one moneth after he Taketh hys othe. (z) Also yt is Enacted that the yongest m' waideyn shalbe Rentor or m* Howells lands and thereof accomptable half-yerely accordyng to the Acte thereof lately Made.) ' The illuminations are too seriously damaged by damp to be repioduced. ^ For these see p. 281 of this vol. ^ This indicates that this oath was to be read at the Quarter-day Meetings. 1603-1 L 1 The Oath Book or V Earliest Ordinances, I40f. (i) Regula- tions with regard to Merchant Strangers. (2) Forfeit, tures to be divided be- tween the Masters and the City. ( 3 ) Appoint- ment of Custos at Blakwelhall. (3) Next is ' A charge for the m' Wardens oneJy' dated 30 June 15-^7, forbidding aay Warden to ' departe from hens into the parties of beyonde the Seas ' without 5 lycence of the Master and assistence fyrst obteyned ', under a penalty of £^\o. Both this order and the next are marked ' Lege '. (4,) The last order, dated a6' June, iffS'o, requires the Wardens to give a 'Juste perfect and true accompte of all the presentment money, Spoone silver, casuall Fynes' and other moneys which shall come into their hands. (f) The Renter Warden's Oath, temp. Philip and Mary, occupies the next page. (See Appendix, vol. ii.) , Then follow the ordinances of the Society' made in 14.05 and entered into this book in 14.^0, as is stated in the Latin heading, the ordinances being in English with illuminated initials. ' In tempore Johannis Walsha Magistri Artis Panariorum Bartholomei James Thome Welles Johannis Pake et Willielmi Brogreve Gardianorum xix° die mensis ffebruarii Anno regni Regis Edwardi quarti Primo. Iste ordinaciones flfiierunt scripte in libro isto.' The preamble is addressed to the Mayor and Aldermen by the Commons of the City, who pray and require that the ordinances which follow may be established and confirmed 'and also set in record by assente and consent of the Comon Counsell of the same Cite^^ No merchant stranger shall sell or buy to or from another merchant stranger within the City on pain of forfeiting such merchandise, ' The privileges of the lieges of oure redouted lord the kyng of Guyen saved and except so always that such buying and selling be made between merchant and merchant '. One fourth part of any forfeiture taken by the Masters of any Craft or Mistery shall be retained by them for their trouble, and ' the remaynent of the seid fyne ' shall be paid ' to the Chambir of the Guyhall to the use of the Cominalte'. Of Blakwellhall. ' Also the maistres and the Crafte of drapers of London and their successours have Power to Chese a persone able wyse and Sufficient such as they wyll answere fore to kepe and oueresee that all maner woUen , ' N.B. In the ordinances which follow, the passages m brackets are those parts of the original form which have been altered ; those in italics have been added at a later date. ^ By the Stat, i j Henry VI, 145^-7, all ordinances of Gilds were to be con- firmed by governors of cities, burghs, or towns in which the Gilds were situated. This looks as if the preamble was later than that date. Book of Ordinances ifcj clothes by marchantcz floreyns or strangers brouht led or caried to the seld of Blakwelhall there to be sold And saufely ther kept sold and bought after the franchise and libertee of the Cite aforseid.' The Crafte shall present the same person to the Mayor and Aldermen to be by them accepted and sworn well and truly to keep his oath, and he shall so abide therein at the will of the said Mayor and Aldermen. If he ' doo not duely nor Ryghtfully his ofRce or yf any notable cause or offence be duely proved vpon hym', then he shall be put out from his office of Warden of Blackwell Hall by the Mayor and Aldermen, and the Craft of Drapers shall elect and chose another person for that office and present him to the Mayor and Aldermen to be by them accepted and sworn. * So that theleccion & presentacion of such person Wardein of Blakwel- hall forseid alwey shall be made by the Maistres and Crafte of Drapers forseid and their successours And thamyssion confirmacyon and Remocyon of the said person be in the power and disposicion of the Meire and Aldermen of the Cite forseid.' The above articles approved by the Mayor Aldermen Sheriffs and Common Council and ordered to be entered. Jure Custodis De Blakwelhalle. Ye shal swere that ye shal wel and lawfully serve the Cite of London ^4) Oath of In the office of the seld of Blakwelhall of the same Cite of London And the Gustos saufely and suerly ye shal kepe the Clothes that thider shal be brouht to of Blakwel- selle And ye shal not suffre no merchant estranger fro the liberte of halle. the seid Citee to selle no maner of Wollen Cloth within the seid seld to an othir merchant stranger And yf they doo Anoon ye arieste yt As forfeite to the Chambir of the yeldhall to the behofe of the Cominaltie And ye shal not suffie no merchant stranger bryngyng wollen cloth thedyr, to selle No tyme of the Wyke savyng onely fro j of the clok at After Noone on the thursday on to xj« of the Qok by fore none of the Saturday than next suyng vpon peyn of fForfaiture aforeseid And ye shal not denye the sight of the Clothes brought to the seid Selde to selle to no freman of this Citee (And of al that ye Resceyve or may Resceyve of marchantz straungers comyng with cloth to the seid Selde to selle for the ferme of the Chambris Almaires or hucchus leten to theym by the Chambirleyn for the yeer half yere quarter moneth weke or day good and lawfuU Accompte without any Concelment to the Chabirleyn of the Guyldehall whane and what time ye be Required aad' ye shal yeve) And in almaner thynges that to the office of the Keper of the seid Selde Apperteyne to do well and laufully ye shal be haue you so God you helpe and Holydome and by this Book. ' The word is crossed through to make sense. ^ The words between the brackets are underlined by a later hand. ^6o The Oath Book or ' Also ye shall dwell and kepe your houshold idth'tn the place of Blakiuelhall and left it not to ferm to eny other person And that your keper or kepers otherwise callyd Clerks onder you there he able men and drapers suche as he luele knoiiien luyse and of good condicions and they to he admytted sworn and chosen hy the Maister and Wardens of the Drapers for the tyme heing afore eny of them shalhe putt into eny rewell^ in that place of Blakwelhall And that non other person or persones except yourself shall occupy or take any maner governaunce or rewell in that place. Saving onely the persones whiche he so ahled sworn and admytted hy the Maister and Wardens in maner and form aforesaid And as often as it shall happen your under keper or kepers hy any maner wise to depart e fro that office than an other keper or kepers to he ahled sworn & admytted hy this place in maner & form as is ahouesaid. And in almaner things ^cc ut patet in alio late prox" sequen' in superiori parte, Proclama- Proclamasio facta ex assensu Maioris Aldermannorum Et Communis tion of consilii super Ordinaciones Predictas. ^^ ' Let it be Proclaymed that no persone fforeyn Nor Estraunger bryngyng Cloth to the Citee of london for to selle shewe nor selle yt in no partie wyth In the Citee nother in the Subbarbis of the same but all onely at Blakwelhall the which is specyaly deputed and Assigned be the meir Aldermen and Cominaltie therefore vpon the peyne of forfeiture to the vse of the Cominaltie of all such Cloth so shewed and sold And that no foreyn Estraunger selle or put to selle at Blakwelhall any maner of wollen cloth eny tyme of the weke but aloonly from j of the Clok at after Noone vpon the Thursday on to xj» of the Clok afore noon vpon the Satirday next suyng vpon peyne of forfaiture of all clothis sold on to the Contrary And that all maner Drapers foreyns and Estraungers bryng to Blakwelhall noon Cloth for to selle but alonely hole Qothis And half Clothis lysted at bothe endis vpon peyne of forfeiture of all Clothis founden on to the Contrary to the vse of the Cominaltie. Also that no Person enfraunchessed within the Citee of London Kouer ^ be the vertu of his fraunchesse no Goodis nor merchandises of any foreyn or eny estraunger. Nother by no maner of marchandises within the fraunchesse of this Citee of London to the use and profit of eny foreyn or estraunger upon the peyne of forfaiture of all Goodis and marchandises so kouered and bouht And be side this the same person so kouyring and byeng Goodis And marchandises shal lese his ffraunchise ' This addition was probably added in consequence of the trouble about Cremor. Cf. vol. ii, p. 17. ^ Rule. ^ Cover. Book of Ordinances z6i Omnes iste Ordinaciones fuerunt edite anno regni Regis Henrici Quarti post conquestum vj° Johanne hende existente Maiore. ^ntto Domini 140^, A c & xxiiij^^ yeres past sens "we first enjoyed Blakvjell Hall.-^ These Ordinances are followed on the next page by a bond in VI Latin of the same date entered into by the Drapers, under a penalty of The Drapers jfiooo payable to John Proflyt, Chamberlain of the City of London, to to make make good any damage which might befall Blakwell Hall through fire, good any quod absit, theft, or robbery, by complete rebuilding and full restoration damage as of loss and depredation. This bond was executed in the presence of the blakwell Mayor and Aldermen on the x/th March, 6 Henry IV (i+oy), by the "^"• following members of the Drapers' Company : — Henry Hert, William Crowmer, William Norton, Philip Bangor, Richard Elton, Thomas Coleworth, John Sotner, Robert Twyer, Roger Colney, Thomas Symond, Richard Coroner, Robert Bamburgh, John Lougele, John Davy, John Wyot and Stephen Bugg. Another order inserted of a later date is as follows :^ Tempore Radulphi 14^4-^ or yosselyn maioris inter alia continetur sic. Also that no man goo in to nygh 1476-7. places of the ffraunchises of this Cite that is to say in to Southwark Westmynster No one to Saynt Johnsstrete and other places nere adjoynaunt to the said Citie to mete buy of laith foreyns and straungers the tuhiche if they were not encountred^ tuold hring strangers ni clothe layne tuoll hydes oxen kyne shepe and other merchandises and vitale to the suburbs. tye and forstall as they come to the said Citie and there in places therefore assingned he put to sale vpon payn of grevous imprisonment of his body and forfeitour of all suche merchandises or vitale that he soo hyeth etc. Then follows the 'othe of the kepers seruants or Clerks under the vil Warden of Blakwelhall ' of the date of 1405-. 140J. ' Ye shall swere that ye shall be trewe and of good abering and Regulations demeanour vnto your maister warden of Blakwelhall, And ye shall nether as to Black- bye nor sell nor non other person in your behalf for you, eny maner well Hall, wollen cloth, nor non other wayre nor merchandise that shalbe brought Oath of ser- to Blakwelhall to be sold vppon payn of xl^ sterlings to be levied of you ^ants of the as often tymes as it may be vnderstoud and founden by sufficient profe Custos. that ye so oflFend to be levied vnto the profeit & behouf of the craft of No servant drapers of London, provided alweys that ye or any of you shall bye ? *-istos to asmuche clothe as shall suffice you for your own werings and households, r^^ii^'^ * ^ ' This note is in a much later hand. Sir Roger Clifford sold Blackwell Hall to the City inuSi. In 1293 the City transferred it to John de Banquell and repurchased it in 139J-6, and in 1404 or 140J the Drapers obtained the privilege of appointing the Keeper. Cf. pp. 101-3 of this vol. ^ This is of the date of 1464-^ or 1476-7, since Ralph Josselyn was Mayor in those years. The order has been evidently inserted later, as the ink shows, but apparently by the same scribe. It therefore probably is of the earlier date. for his own i6z The Oath Book or And also for your seuerall occupyings onely within your own howses'or sboppys, that is to say for to kytt make or sowe hossen or garments for the encreas of your levings in that behalf, and not otherwyse vppon the payn aboue reherced, More ouer ye shall not by your weting or knowlege sufFre to be bought any maner wollen cloth nor other wayres or mer- To -watch chandise that shalbe brought vnto Blakwelhall to the vse or profeit of and report ^1^7 foren or straunger vppon the payn aforesaid, ye shall also kepe the all violations due tymes & hours ordeyned & assingned vnto you for the markett to be of regula- kept, that is to say from one of the clok at after nown on the thursday, tions. vnto xj of the clok before nown on the Satterday next ensuyng, Also if ye knowe that eny foren or straynger bring cloth to the Cite of London to sell and he make any shewe or sale therof in any ports of the Cite or in the suburbs of the same but onely at Blakwelhall whiche is deputed & assigned by the Mair Aldermen & Cominaltie therefore, ye shall anone yeve warnyng vnto the Maister of Blakwelhalle to the Maister or Wardens of drapers of london aforesaid or to one of them, and thus to doo ye endeuour yourself dayly with due serche and specially in suche places which ye thynk moste suspect and in all other places. All whiche articles and other good ReuUs & Ordinaunces apperteynyng to the said service or office to your power ye shall wele and truely observe and kepe soo help you Godd & Halydom and by this Booke.' VIII Next follows the Oath of the Clerk, evidently a later insertion, Oath of the of the i<)th century.' On the opposite page is a minute dated -lG Novem- Clerk. ber 1543 recording a meeting held 'in this our new hall late purchesyd of our sayd soueraigne Lord the Kyng to here and pervse our ordenaunces of olde tyme made by our predecessours which began in the year of grace I J3Z (' Item rec' de Bernard Bosyan de dancastre de veile quartera.gc ij= Item rec' de C & j persones pour quarterage de ceste an v^' xij"* Item rec' dez executo«rz de John Prentout xl^ Summa dez rec' xxxv" xiiij"^ ob' Item rec' de Ric' Baynard de veile quarterage & no^re temps vij' Summa en cler dez rec' xxxv'' viij= ij'^ ob' lez Payementz del Box de dieu En pr/micz paye a Sir John Nicholl p xix' v'f xij"^ les Resseitz del Temporal Box ^ per John Brokley Wyllyam Botreaux Clement lyfiyn & Rauf Valentyn En pr/mez ressu en le dit Boxe par lez maynz de Thomas Pyke Walter Chertesseye John Somer & Edmond Salle veilez meisterz en veile ore xxxvj'' v^ Item rec' en le dit Boxe le mesme temps en bon ore viij'" v^ Item rec' en le dit Boxe ea bon ore xxxij'" xvj^ j"^ Summa tota.]is dez rec' en le temporal Boxe de veile ore & novell Ixxvij^' vj= j'^ ^ Item rec' de Ric' Sutton po»r John Wotton veile apprentice xx= Item rec' de Robert Swaftham pour William Grene veile apprentice xx= Item rec' de Thomas Hampton pour Thomas Halsham veile apprent/Ve xx^ Item rec' de John Tokevile po«r j veile apprentice xx^ Item rec' de John lynche pe«r son entre liij= iuj^ Item rec' de sir Dauy fFedyan pour lentre de John Benett liij= iiij'> Item rec' de Robert fBtzandrew po«r Thomas Malter veile apprentice xx^ Item rec' de Willyam Mette po«r John Standropp novell apprentice xx= Item rec' de John Saykyn po«r Roger Hulse novell apprentice xx^ Item rec' de John Higham po»r Roger Bamborwh novell apprent/Ve xx^ Item rec' de John Boteler po»r Elyevan Andernak novell apprentice xx^ Item rec' de William \Veston po»r Henr' Bray novell apprent/Ve xx= Item rec' de William Herre pour John Berell novell apprentice xx= I Shears. = The Temporal Box is here mentioned and continues to be so. 3 Old Gold and new Gold. The old Gold was depreciated about i per cent. Cf. p. 297 of this vol. leos'i P p xpo The Earliest TFardens' Accounts Item rec' de John legett po»r Henr' kent novell apprentice xx« Item rec' de Thomas Baker pour John Hill novell apprentice xx^ Item rec' de Ric' Hersey pour John Sergeant novell a,pprentice xx^ Item rec' de John Wyott pour laurens Bown novell apprentice xx^ Item rec' de Willy^rm Botreaux pour Thomas Barstaple novell 2,pprentice xx« Item rec' de Robert Tatersale pour Thomas Canyngis novell apprentice xx^ Item rec' de Regnold Mariott alias diet' Welham pour Ric' Pratt noveil apprentice xx^ Item rec' de William Raper pour John Bryan veile apprentice xx= Item rec' de John Brokley pour John Salekyld nouell apprentice xx^ Item rec' de viij^ &c ix persones pour le rydyng de le meyr de chescon howzme iiij"* ' Item de John Gladwyn pour son entre Item de Robert Chambre pour son entre Item de Willy S John Botiller x« dont ressu vu dount ressu 1^ ressu 1= S Walter Chertesey xx marcs dont ressu X marcs dont ressu iijii vjs viijd S Robert Tatersale x m«rcs dount ressu V marcs de ces Ressu xxxiij^ iiij'' John Brokley xx marcs dount ressu x" de ces ressu xxxiij^ iiij"* S John Beterenden v" dont ressu 1' dount ressu xxys S John Brekelez iiij" dount ressu xl^ dount ressu XX' S Robert Cristendom v" dount ressu xl= dount ressu xx^ & pris Ressu xx' Thomas Islam liij^ iiij'J dount n/1 S John Higham x marcs dount ressu V marcs de ces ressu xxxiij' iiij'i ' Amount altered from xxji'. '^ Their ffouse where they are building their Hall. Some 1 1 j subscribe in all j cf. later lists ; and lo journeymen 'doone a le Hall ', cf. p. 309 of this vol. ^ Altered in the original to viijl*. * N.B.— 30 reside in Candlewick Street, 17 in Chepe, 31 in Cornhill. The Earliest Wardens' Accounts xpg S John ffennell x m«rcs dount ressu V marcs dount ressu xxxiij^ iiij'^ Walter ffrebarn v" dount ressu xxxiij* iiij"^ xxxii/ iiij"' Richard Waldegraue liij^ iiij'^ & v" dount n/1 Robert Cotton liij^ ixif dount ressu xx^ dount ressu XX' S Thomas Hardyng xl« dount ressu XX' de CCS reu XX' fFol paiyd John Bokenham xl^ dount ressu XX' S Robert Banburgh xl^ dount ressu XX' dount ressu Y? Ressu X' S Richard Chamberlayn x? dount ressu XX' dount ressu X' Nicholas Walsh xx= dount ressu X' John Browode xx^ dount ressu vjs viij"* S John Saykyn xl^ dount ressu XX' de ces ressu X' S John Glyn xl^ dount ressu XX' dount ressu x^ Ressu X' Herre Wotton xl= dount ressu XX' dount ressu X^ S Emery Matany xl^ dount ressu XX' dont ressu in felip arin xx' Piers Wymondam xl^ dount ressu XX' S Thom-isCook xl^ dount ressu xl^ & q«/et«s est S Robert Clopton xl^ dount ressu XX' Walter Rideler xl^ dount ressu XX' S John Seynt John xl' dount ressu XX' dount ressu X' ' s/r Ric' Thorpe p^rrson de s. Swytthyns xl^ dount Chepe vf viij"^ ress X' S John Wyott v marcs dount ressu dount ressu XX' Robert Beuere iiij" dount ressu xl' S Ric' atte lee liij^ iiij'^ dount ressu xxvj' viij"^ S John Prentout xl= dount ressu XX' John Spenser xl^ dount ressu XX' John lobenlwm xl^ dount ressu XX' ^ A priest a member. 294 The Earliest Wardens' Accounts S Willy«m Bernez xl= S John Enote x'^ S Richard Hersey xl^ Robert Colney xl^ Hewe Byrche xl^ S Willy^m Botreaux xl^ Nichok/ Waldern xl= Thomas Stanys iij" Rauf Holand xl^ Thoin Willyam Chervell xl' S Thomas Partre xl' S Phelipp Malpas xl' Willyam Warde S Benett Harlewyn S John Willyam xl' John ffarnham xx' marcs V marcs iij" liij' nxf xl' xl' liij' iiij ^ Robard Bamvour CJ «3 John Wyon <(j ^ Qement lyffyn ^ l; John lyngge j3 .= Wilie Parker ^"^ Thoniizs Eyre ^ o Thom<7s Cooke fe^ ^ John Seykyn ^ ^ Robard Coton n ^ John Glyn ^ ^ Niclas Walderne = Will/^m Beverell ^ Aw«o iiij° Henrici vj Accounts Cest la Conte de John Seint John Simond Eyr John Wotton & William presented Bernes flfait le xxviij iour Octobre Ian du gr«ce m' iiij'= xxv Nov. 141 y. En p/mes Ressu in la Box de dev ^ar les mains de John Brokle Clement for the year lyffyn William Botreaux & Raff Valentyn S»wma vij" ij^ iiij"! -^"g- '4^4 Item Ressu de Thomas Alman Scherman po«7- Rent dun an a le ffeste de *° ■'^"S- Seint John Baptyst xjvj^ viij Item Rec' de q««rterages de C & ij perssones v'' ij' Item Rec' de John Kelly de veil dette xiij^ iiij'i Item Rec' de John Elvassh de veil quarterage xif Item Rec' de Clement lyfEn pour payer la rerage de quyte rent a Sent mathus x^ S»wma totalis de Receyts de Box de dev amo«te xxxviij'' xvij^ les payments de la Box de dev En primes paye a sir John Nicholl prest poar j quarter xxxiij^ iiij'^ Item paye a sir John lewys po«r j an outre po«r dj Salerye & pur Reward de la messe de no^re dame iiij" xvj= viij"! Item paye a Ric' Croner de Amesse xl= Item paye a John Colchester in plen Almesse vj^ viij"^ Item paye a Robert Dyminck de Almesse xiij^ iiij^ Item paye a Water Honyspell de Almesse j an iij'' viij"* Item paye a Se»t Mathus po«r quyt re»t j an xx^ Item paye a Suthcote quyt re»t po»r j an xx= Item paye po«r Reparac/on de tapers a le bowe xvj^ Item paye po«r amending de la branche vj^ viij^ Item paye a le Clerk de bowe pour son labo»r vj^ viij'* Item paye a John Brykeville po«r j an iiij'' Summa de payme»ts amoute xx'' les detto»rs de Box de dev Ric' Bamard doit pour q»«rterage de no^re tewzps xij"* Water Gavtron doit po«r q««rterage de no^re tewps xij"^ John Bokinham doit po»r q»/?rterage de no^re tewps xij"* John Elvyssh po»r quarterage in n.otre tezwps xij"^ Stephen Hulle po»r quarterage de no?re te»?ps xij"^ Thomas Dowe po«r quarterage de notre temps xij"^ Thomas Roche po»r quarterage de no^re te;wps Xij"* John Tokevyle p«>»r quarterage de notre te>wps xij"* Ric' Bokeland po»r quarterage de notre temps xij"* Water Redeler quarterage de notre tewps xij"^ Allexandir Anne de quarterage de notre tewps xij"* The Earliest Wardens' Accounts X97 John Smyth de branktre de veil & notre tewps xiij= Thomas Eyr de veil dette po«r j Scherma» x= Henri Grene & John Leyceter de veil dette xxj'^ Thomas thorndon Chalkmaw de veil dette vj= viij'' Thomas Isselham de veil dette & notre te/wps vj^ Ric' londisdale de veil dette x= Benet Scherma» de veil dette pF ij peyre Scheres xxv^ vj'^ Henri Hert de veil q«art»-age & notre teraps iij^ Andrev Trotte doit po«r iij q««rters rewt a S John xx^ Nicholas Hay doit po»r re»t a S. John Bap' Iviij^ la S«/wma de detto»rs de Box de dev viij'' iiij« xj"* Ceux sont les receyts de temporall Box En primes Ressu in la dit Box de Nowell & veyll ore S««?ma iiij^^xij" xvj' dont perdu in la Change de la veil Ore ' vij^ vij<* et ensi rest cler in bon Ore S«wma iiij'^x'' iij^ iiij"* Item Ressu de Willham Russell po«r Thomas Cranffeld son Apprentys xx^ Item Ressu de Willham Russell po»r Willy am Dissher son Apprentys xx^ It«w Ressu de Water Thorp powr Thomas Dyer xx^ lUm Ressu de John Wotton pour Robert Byfflete xx^ Itew Ressu de Henri Wotton po«r Wilham Hallehed xx^ Item Ressu de Thomas Akers po»r Robert Akers xx^ Ite»? de John Gladwyn powr Robert Baylly xx= Item de Simond Eyr po«r Robert Spe»sser xx= Item de Wilham Ayllyff po«r Ric' Grafton xx= Ite»« de John Norman po«r Thomas Nevnam xx^ Item de Wilham Bernalby po«r John Mellyn xx^ Item de Wilham Botreux po»r John Strange xx= Itew de John Bryklys po«r John Paynell xx= Itewi? de John Ottesford po«r John Sebarn xx= Item de John Wyot po«r Ric' Mo»gomery xx« Item de Robert Banburh po«r Wilham Seint PouU Thomas Golde & John iFramton iij" Itewi? de John Stanton po«r John Barmsby xx^ Item de John Saykin po»r Ric' Wynne xx^ Item de Water Chirchessey po«r Robert Marton xx= Item de John Tokevylle po»r ij veil aprewtys xl= Item de Wilham Herde pour John dene xx^ Item de Wilham Twyer po«r Robert Jacob xx= Itewz de Hans Wyssewyller po«r son ffraunchys & son entre iij'' xiij' iiij doit Wilham Warde de iiij marcs doit ' A clergyman a member. ' This entry is crossed out in the original. Xlj" soIiij''vjsviij' vij marcs 1^ 1= sol. iiij marcs xiijs iiijn de SpwVuall box come de temporall £n primes poar batyllage a le fl^eyr de Westmewster xvj<^ Item po»r Reward de la meyris messe xl= Item po«r doynton Sergawt a la ffeyr de B xl"* Item po«r Barges al Cermewt de Roy ' ij= viij"* \tem pur Barges a les Schereves ij^ vj^ Itezc pur exspenses aler a Schene p9«r veyer la plase de les Selestrins ^ ys ijd Item in vin po«r Master Mapylton & autres ad veyer la Sale de vesq»e de Bathe ^ viiji^ Item in vin p»«r diuissing ^ de no^re Sale in prese»s de les Aldermans & autres gens xv^ Item po«r j peyre endentoars par entre Salisbuii & nous de no^re Sale* ijs vjd Item poar expewses aler a Croydon poar veyer no/re la fframe auesqae ffaukysweil iiij^ vj"* Itew? done a flFaukyswell poar Son Reward vj= viij^ Itew? done a Maister Mapylton poar son Reward xiij^ iiij"* Itew poar iij whell barwes iij^ vj^ ' Cerment, probably ' Serment 'j the oath taken to the young King. In April 1425 the young King Henry VI appeared at St. Paul's and was thence led through the City, although he was only three years old. Cf. Fabyan, Concordance of Histories, ed. 1811, p. 594. =' The Company were now erecting their Hall and apparently were sending persons to visit important Halls. * devising. '' Salisbury was the Master Carpenter employed by the Company ; cf. Unwin, Industrial Organization, p. 6%, for peculiar position of Building Trades. 3 ox The Earliest Wardens^ Accounts Item pour amewdin dun veil whell barwe ' vj'' Item pour vn seve V^ Item pour vn rop pour la well iiij' iiij'^ \tem pour vj treyes xx Rec' de Will/<«m Crowmer po«r son promys v" Rec' de John Gedney po»r son promys x"" Rec' de William Weston po«r son promys lij^ iij'' Rec' de Water Gawtron po«r son promys 1' Rec' de Pers Wymondh^m po»r son promys xx= Rec' de John Otteforde po«r son promys xx= Rec' de Richard Stryke po»r son promys xx= Rec' de John Knyzt pwr son promys xx« Rec' de John Norman p«»r son promys xx= Rec' de Robard Cotton pwr son promys xiij* iiij"^ Rec' de John Hylle po«r son promys xx* Rec' de John legette po»r son promys xx' Rec' de John kyrkeby poar son promys xx^ Rec' de Willwm Ayliffe pear son promys xx= Rec' de Wiliyma Xatalis clvij'' xj^ j'^ lez Rec' de lez lowes ^ doone a le Hall Rec' -de John Boys Rec' de Thomas Scotte Rec' de Thomas Eswell Rec' de John Whitehoode Rec' de Will/am Mette Rec' de Richard Screyth Rec' de Water Thorppe Rec' de John Stystede Rec' de Willi<7m Strotibrde Rec' de Waren Summa. liij^ iiij^ lez Rec' de lez Prentices Item de John Pereire pour John Diuinesby Item de John lyngle pour Thonws £lde Item de Harr' longspe pour Will/«m Gierke Item de Will/«m Weston pour Thomas Cooke Item de Will/am Weston pour John Sayere Item de ThonMS Cooke pour Willidrm Marwe Item de Robard Ergham pour John kyrkeby Item de Amery Matany pour Adam Wyntrugham Item de John Wyot pour Robard Derby Item de Will/am Parker pour Robard Thorcote Item de William Warde pour John Herteley Item de Will/am Harre pour Richard lyon Item de Richard Screyth pour Richard Sadersall Item de John Brykles pour John Stokker Item de John Wotton pour Thoniirs de Brunne Item de Reynold WiUJam pour Peter Calcote Item de Alexander Childe pour John Fowlere Item de Will/«m Creke pour Water langrysh Item de Thonws Rydell pour Emound Bendish Item de Robard Tadirsall pour Water Morton * The workmen or jonmeymen, but whether thejr are Drapers is doubtful, apparently subscribe to building of the Hall. Cf. also previous page, where a wife of one ' doone a le Hall ' subscribes. iijU vjs viij^ xx* xxvij sixd jciij" iiij*' iij= iiijd iij= iiij'i iij^ iiij"* Vjs viij^ iij^ iiij^ iij= iiij'^ iij» iiijd vj- viij"* vjs vLLj"! xx* xx» xx* xx^ XX* xx* XX* XX* XX* XX* XX* XX* XX* XX* XX* XX* XX* XX* XX* XX* gio The Earliest Wardens^ Accounts Item de Thomas Ynglond pour John Ynglond xx» Itffwz de Robard Clopton pour son preatice xx» Summi xxiji' lez payments de le Box de Dieu Empr/m;V paie a sir William Sawgere pour j anne yj" xiij» iiij"* Item paie a sir John Walsman po«r j anne di' paymewt iij" vj* viij'' Item paie a dit sir John p John pour iiij" de Candill vj"" Item paie a le chaundeler pour le Braunche iij ffoys xiij» x"* Item paie a lez Chaunters & lez prests pour le derge & le Gierke xj» viij<* Itew paie pour quyte Rent po«r le tenement in Chepe a seynt matheus pour j anne a Seynt John Baptiste xx» Item paie poa?* quyte Rent pour le tenement in Candewykstrete a Sowth- cote po«r j anne a Seynt John Baptiste xx» Item paie a John longle in almys vj' viij^* Item paie a Water hounspell in almys xiij» iiij"* Item paie a Brekelvyle pour j anne pour son Saler' iiij" Item paie po»r j Chaperon pour Breklvyle iij» Item paie pour j Chevawe po«r le dit Brekelvyle iij ffoys iij* Summa xviij^' xiiij* viij"* lez payments de le schoppe apres le Bakhous Emprimis j laborer iij io»rs le io»r vd ob' Summa xvj<' ob' Item pour iiij quarters po«r j Benche le quarter ij"* ob' x"* Item pour ij Boordis po«r le Benche ps' xij'^ Item pour ij Peesis pour le Staier ps' xij'' Item pour ij Boordis po«r j doore ps' viij"* Item pour Schelly & le flfete pour ij fformys ps' viij"* Item pour j c de Beche latthis ps' v"* Item pour Naylis & White Nayle pour le latys ps' xvj"' Item pour j Ryng Crompe & j lacche po«r le door ij"* Item pour j Payr hengys po«r le doore iiij'' Item pour j Carpenter vj iours le io«r viij 'i\if Necolas Wotton doit po«r son promys ]' Thom<»s Isselh^m doit po«r son promys liij' iuj^ Raffe Holland doit po«r son promys xx» Richard Waldgraue doit po«r son promys Iiij» iiij'' Sir John Thorpe parson de seynt Swethenys doit po«r son promys xxiij' iiij^ Will/am Weston doit po»r son promys lv» v^ John ' Rodogge dettour po»r Will/am Weston xxvij' ix'' John Claverynge doit po»r son promys x> Sol William ffooster doit po«r son promys xxxiij» iiij'i Thomas Baker doit po«r son promys v'' Sol i^ John Gooldhawke doit powr son promys xx= Will//7m Twyer doit p»«r son promys xxvj» viij"^ Thomi7S Clement doit po«r son promys x' John flamhtfm doit po»r son promys vj' viij"* Thomas Yve doit po«r son promys xl' John Mayston doit po«r son promys vj* viij"> Reynold Will/«m doit po«r son promys xx» Summa xlij" xiij' ij'^ ' lez dettours de lez Prentis John Massy doit ■pour John Harry son prentw xx^ John Wynne doit pour John Merston son prentice xx« William Sewale doit pour John Sewale son prentice xx' John Blake doit pour WillZ/jm Delwoorth son prentice xx' Gameley Gawen doit pour John Spenser son prentice xx» Galfrydus Zermowth doit pour Will/«m Scheriaunt son prentice xx» Hugonys ffeliotte doit pour John Warde son prentw xx' John Gedney doit pour y/il\iam Peryngton son prentice xx' John lubenham doit pour Jacobus mortemer son prentice xx» Symond Eyre pour Robard Spenser doit pour son prent/V xx» Will/am Twyer doit pour Robard Jacobbe son prentis xx= Summa xj" lez Dettours de Quartrage le parson de Bawe John Tukfelde Will/am Crowmer Will/am Breton Necolas Wotton Thomas Downe Water Gawtron Steuene Hull Richard Baynard Thomas Aueray ' This entry is crossed through in the original. ^ Corrected to xlj'' v' v^ in the original. The Earliest Wardens^ Accounts 315- Alexaunder Anne John ffarnh«m Thomas Isselh<»m John Buknam John Somer John Elvysh Water Redder John Woode John Bowoode Richard Bokeloiid Raff HoUond Harr' Herte Richard Clere Rest' in cler a phylyp malpas & son compaynouns xxvij" ij" x"* viij yer of Kyng Haf-ry the vj^ Accounts Ceste la Compte de Willwrn Crowmez-e Will/^m Weston John Heygh^m presented & Ric' atte lee ffait le xxvj io«r dottobre Ian de gr xij^ Wat^r Gavtron xij'' John Enotte xij^ Ric' Swanesseye xij^ Alysaundre Anne xij'' Symond CopstheflF xij^ Thomas Gameley de veyle & nouell ij' Stephew Hulle de veyl & novell ij' Thomas Averay xij'' Thomas Pyke Junior xij^ Johne Gedney ' doit pour Robert Clerk son zpprentys xx» Item doit pour John Dowbele son ^pprentys xx" John Grisley doit pour John Budley son apprentjyr xx' Robert fiytz Andrew doit pour Willwm Dyxson son ^pprentys xx» John Stanton doit po«r Thom«s Salle son apprifntp xx' Deliufre a Robert Cristendom & a John flemyll in parti de paymewt de vijU vj^ j'' a eux par le mist' de dr^jperzpwr plumb' duez lez v le doz aprentis au/»nt ditz a notre acompt le xxvj io»>* doct' Ian viij'* le Ri H. vj« lez Nowmez de novell gentz Sir John Peche John Whythone ' This and four following entries are crossed through in the original. The Earliest Wardens^ Accounts 319 Stfphs» Dalman Geffry Chytcok Will/<*m Rapere Will»rfm North<*mpton WillMin Russell Hugh Asthull Thomas Thorndon Knno ix° Henrici vj' Accounts Ceux sonat lez Resseits quex Robert Tetersale John lyng Will/«m piesented Creke & Will/<«m Ayloff onnt Rescieux lour tempz p««r lez meistrs Nov. 1430, de drapws in le Box de dieu ^"^ y^^'' Enprimez Re?c' en le Box de dieu par lez maynez de Will/am Crowmer ^"S* '4*9~ William Weston John Heyham & Ric' Att ley veylez maystrs de 8" ''^^°' drapers v" xvj' xj"! ob' Resc' de Reynold Will/am po«r la Rent in Schepe po»r j Ane vij'' Resc. de John Qowsettw po«r la Rent in Candwykstrede po«r j Awne Vjli Resc' de John Wolfale p««r la Rent in Swythenr lane po«r j A»ne xx* Resc' de Alyson Algar po«r la Rent in swythens lane po«r j A»ne xx^ Resc' de Thomas Halman po»r la Rent in swythens lane po«r iij quarters xvj* viij^ Resc' de Will/am Stobdale po«r la Rent in swythenx lane poar iij q«artery xxiijs ix"! Resc' de Henry Barton pwr la Rent in Swythens lane po«r iij quarters XX' Resc' de Andrew Trot po«r la Rent en swythe»r lane pour iij quarters xv' Resc' de John Bothaw po«r la Rent en swytheny lane p««r iij quarters xxij' vj'^ Resc' de lez quartwagez de iiij'" vij personez iiij'' vij« Summa xxxj'* vj' x"* lez Resseits de la temporal Box Resc' de Baron de Resset de le Roy po«r son ffredam vj' viij* Resc' de John Bitterden p»«r ffredam de son howme xx= Resc' de Symkyn Walter pour son ffredam iiij" Resc' de WiU/am Cvrtenale de Covyntre po«r son ffredam viij" Resc' de Barnard Beke po«r son entre Vj» viij"^ Resc' de Stokuz de Abyndon po»r j Brodur xx" Resc' de John Tetwsale pwr son entre vj' viij"^ Summa xiiij" xiij' iiij"^ Resc' de ffynez A le ffayr^ de Seynt Barthelmew Kntres tempz de dyuerz gentez xxxj« iiij"! Resc' de Phylyp Sate po«r lez wyrbez de Salle xx« Resc' de Ric' Sutton po«r lez wyrbez de Sail xx' 3 10 The Earliest Wardens* Accounts Resc' de John Billysdon po«r j fyne vj» viij^ Resc' de Will/^m Pap po«r j ^ne xx"* Resc' de Robert Ergh^m p»»r j ffyne de ij obytes xiiij^ Resc' de dyu^^-ez gentez po«r le drape de Arraz yj'' xv' Resc' de dyuerez gentez po«r le stvllyng de Prcnteshodez xlv* iiij* S«»?ma xiij'' xviij"* lez Resseits de "^evAices Resc' de John Knyght po«r John Sayere son Appr^nt/V xx» Resc' de John Bilysdon poar John ffynchyngfeld xx* Resc' de Symkyn Rowel po«r John Gylmer & John Alyn son Aprentez xl» Resc' de John Brokeley p<7«r Ric' Venton & Water Walgr«ve son Aprentez xl' Resc' de Ric' Scharp po«r Thomas Rodok son apprent/V xx» Resc' de Hew Hasthool po«r Crystofur Banastur son Apprent/V xx» Resc' de John Daberam po«r John Bryte son ApprenbV xx* Resc' de John Browne po«r Will/<»m Nichol son Apprent/V xx' Resc' de John Spensar po«r Will/- j latez in le parlar viij' Item pay A Thomas Wynchecowbe & A son co/wpayn po«r le fesang de lez iiij Stolez & iiij Popeyz xvjs iij-i Item pay pwr carvyng de ij popeez ouek iiij Augellez v' Item pay po»r ix Estrysch Berduz le borde yj"* po«r lez stolez iiij^ vj* Item pay po«r cariage de lez Borduz po»r Naylez & glew ij* j^ Item pay A le paynter po«r payntteng de le tabul trestelez & po«r iiij Popez & gylten de iiij Aungeliz xv* Item pay p<»«r iiij elmen Borduz poa^- le sper' in le kichon po»r legs & naill iij' Item pay a Wynchecowbe carpenter po«r son labowr de le sper xx'' Item pay poar j laborer po«r vj iourez ij* ix"* Item pay pour Barrz de hyrn pour iij Wyndowz in le Salle vij* Item pay pour glasyng de j wyndow & di' xxx* Item pay a Brykefeld pour j carteful Sande & lode lyme & j sac xix"* Item pay a Brykefeld pour m' tylez v= vj^ Item pay pour le wassyng de Napere viij"* Item pay pour iij" Sowde A le plumware Xviij"* Summa ix" viij* v"* ob' Summa totalis de lez payments Amout' Iviij'' vij* viij^ ob' Et Ency Rest cler' in or Summa xvij'' xiij* xj"* ob' lez dettorez de la Rent Brykfeld William Stocdale doit pour j qaarte?- de midsomer vj* iij"* pleg*. Henry Barton doit pour j quarter de midsomer vj* viij"^ Andrew Trot doit pour j quarter de midsomer v* John Bothhaw doit pour j quarter de midsomer vij* vj^ lez detttfrez de Apprent/Vey Benet Arllewyn doit pour Jacob Waldeby son Apprent/V xx* John Reynold doit pour Will/umma xl* lez dettoars de lez apprentishodis Henrj Wotton po«r John Carpinter xx' Thowas Hardyng po«r Willzam de lahaye q«/ fiiist le apprentise de John Glyn xx' John Briklys po»r Thow^zs Bri' Northeflolke xx' John Wardewyke po«r Will/ ffor his laborer ij dayes -xf ffor traunsom nayl iij^ ffor a trestel foot j"^ ffor bord in the gable ende of the halle iiij'' ffor naylis f- ffor the werkmanschip therof iiij"* ffor refresching of the cotidyan hallyng xxiJ ffor bromys and for a schovele iiij"* ffor a keye to derby is schoppe dore iiij'^ ffor hopis to the olde tubbis iij'' ffor a lokk to the lede & for a bolt & me»ding of a lok in chepe x* ffor vj burdons of ruschen & the berynge xviij'' ffor hanging vp & taking don of the hallyng Jisf ffor a quarton of roof tyle xviij'^ ffor ij<= tylys xiij^ ffor oure ij prestis singinge at bowe Churche x" ffor Ric' Waldyngfeld liij^ iiij"* ffor Thom/js Qement iiij" ffor our wax for the yere at bowe Churche xvij' ffor mynstrallis and pleyeris at your feste xvj= viij<* ftbr wasching of naperie ij^ ffor the clerkis of the bowe for alle the yere vj" viij'^ ffor the singeris at our masse v^ ffor piirson and clerkis at our dirige & masse iiij'^ ffbr ringeris at bowe churche & drinking xij^ ffor allowaunce of the meiris messe jd' ffor allowaunce of aldermen of other craftis by alle the company nempned and assigned xl^ ffor lym & werkmanschip at bowe corner vj^ [total of page] xxiiij'' xvij^ xj'' The Earliest Wardens' Accounts 339 for ij garnettis for a Gapyas yf- fFor quarter bordis & ledgis viij^ fFor half an hundred of yj peny nayl iij<* ffor planke borers and fyletts V* fFor a Carpenter a day viij"i ob' fFor quit rente to seynt mathewe for a yere xx^ ffbr taking dou» & setting on of glas wyndows at yo»y feste viij'' fFor led to the Goter in the kechen and thoruz the larder xxxix^ iij"* ffor quyt rente of the bakhous ' xx' fFor quyt rente of the posterne v^ fFor the persun of Seynt swythyns vj^ viij"* flFor a bylle owt of the Chambre for apprentys hodis xx^ ffor an obligacon and defesauncez to Derby and for wax xiiij<^ [total of page] iiij" xvj^ xj"* ob' The somwe of all the expencM aforeseid liiij" xvj= 111]"^ ob' The Som/we in money in the box is v^' viij^ ix^ ob' These ben the detours to the craft dewe by the sessing of th/V = o»r yere Robert Clopton iij Symond Eyre Robert Cristendom and Staundon John ffabyan Harry loilgespee John Whyt Wyll/ xvij^ Wylliam Surcotys yiif Wyll/ia:m Baron xij^ Thomi«s Burgon yv^ Wyllwm Mund xij^ iiij' These ben the dettours of Apprentyshodys ^ my maister Brokley for Robe?*t Seyken xiij^ iiij'^ my maister Brokley for Walter xiij= iiij"^ my maistere Brokley for Thom/«s Hapthorp xiij= iiij^ Symond Eyre for Robert ffyscher xiij^ iiij'' Wyll« xx* The Earliest Wardens' Accounts 345- John Whyte Willwm Home Reynolde Welham John Wyot Richard fFordell WiUiam AlyfFe Benet Harlwyn John RyngfFeld Nycho/i/s Barton John Bryges Thomas Coke ye Elder John Hyll in Cornhyll John Crystmas in Cornhyll John Wotton Myddylton in Suffblke [total of page] xxx" x= Thes bene the Detto«ys off olde qa^rteragw wych ware gyfyn to vs My v£Mstex Brokley xij*^ Robert Whyttyngh^m ij* Raffe Holand ij= S/r Will//«ni Gervyse ij* Thomas Hasley ij* John Byttysden 'if Richard Swaynseye ij* Thomas Pyke ij' Will/am Surcotys xij<^ Will/am Baron ij^ Thomas Burgone xij"* Will/am Mounde xif My maistei Nycho/as Wotton xij'^ My mahter John Raynwell xij<^ John Tatyrsall xij^ John Kyrkeby xif Geffiray yermowthe xij"^ Will/am norhamton xij"^ Will/am Parchmener xij William Gervys Thomas Hasley John Hygh«m John ffemall John Byttyrden John Tatyrsall John Kyrkby Geffray yermowthe John Ramsede Thom/?s Stanus John Dyer Alysaundyr Chylde Nycoles Barton John Spenser Thom- Haysand. Thomas Burgoyne ma» off'lawe ' Aspley ma» off lawe ' per thursto«. [total of page] xviij^' The Some off" all the detts ys Iv" x= iiij"! All to John Ruddoke owyth ffbr di' a yer rent xiij^ iiij^ xij"* xij"* xij^ xij"* xif yi\f yXf xij"J xij<> XIX NOTE ON GRANT OF THE SITE OF THE FIRST DRAPERS' HALL In the reign of Edward I, Robert Ayguylon left a ' tenter ground ', i. e. a plot where clothes are stretched after fUlIing or dyeing, which had apparently once belonged to Fitzalwyn, first Mayor of London, to the Chapel of Watton atte Stone in frankalmoigne.^ This Chapel granted the site in the same reign to Fulk St. Edmund at the rent of 5: marks to the Chapel and 6s. %d. to the King, and his descendants held it till the reign of Richard II. It was then declared forfeited as having been devised in mortmain by Robert Ayguylon and first given by the King into the custody of John Hende, a Draper, and then granted to Sir John Beauchamp (1384.) with a rent of 5 marks payable to the Chapel. It had then certain shops built on part of it. In 1 385: Sir John granted it to Richard Forster, Thomas Charleton, and two others for 6 score marks. But Hende continued to occupy a piece of the ground 3 8 ft. by 8 ft. abutting on his own house.^ In 14.08 Richard Forster and Thomas Charleton granted the plot to the following joint tenants : Elias Bockyng, John Botiller, Walter ' N.B. — Two lawyers, members. ^ Sharpe, Calendar of Wills, ii. 6o\. ^ A. viii. 177. Thejirst 'Drapers' Hall 54.9 Gawtron, William Denardeston, William Weston, Richard Coroner, John Gedney, Robert Luton, and John Prentout, reserving a yearly rent of ^y for Forster's life and the Livery of the Company.^ In \i,x6 (5' Henry VI) John Gedney, William Weston, and Walter Gawtron released their share to John Botiller and Richard Coroner.^ In the same year John Botiller and Richard Coroner granted it to William Crowmer,John Gedney, Robert Tattersall, Sir Thomas Cooke, and thirty-six others. In 1483 (i Richard III) by the death of the other joint tenants the land was in the hands of Philip Cooke, son of Sir Thomas, and he granted it under the name of 'Drapers' Hall' to Sir William Stokker, Harry Eburton, and others. Cf. 40^, fo. 33b, ' Greatdede with letter of attorney of Philip Cook to Sir Wm. Stokker and other ofthe crafte '. In 14.89 (5: Henry VII) the others released their share to Eburton, and in 14.90 Eburton devised it to the Fraternity, as well as other tenements. This will is referred to in the Accounts of 1489-90, ' Item paid to Harry Wodecock scrivener for making a testament and other devises to put Drapers' Hall and other tenements into mortmayn and other expenses ^2 loj. ifd' Cf. Sharpe, Calendar of Wills, ii. doi. Now it is to be observed that, of the grantees in 1408, the names of all, with the exception of Elias Bockyng, Robert Luton, and William Denardeston, appear in the Accounts of 1413-14 and 1423-4, while of the grantees of i^x'^S all appear in the Accounts between 1413-25. As we have no Accounts between 1408-13, it is no wild supposition to make that the three, whose names do not appear in or after 141 f, had died between i4o8-i5'. And if so all the grantees in joint tenancy were Drapers. It is also noticeable that the terms on which Forster granted the land was that he should be granted the Livery of the Brotherhood, which shows that he was, or became, a member. Thus it appears that from 13 8f the land belonged entirely to members ofthe Fraternity, and was no doubt held in trust for it. Further, the Accounts ofthe year \iip.6 mention a sum oi £66 131-. 4^. paid to William Crowmer. We are not told why, yet as the land had been valued in 1385' at 6^ score marks (^80), it seems most probable that the sum paid to Crowmer was for the land or for a balance yet unpaid. This is rendered all the more likely by the iact that in that year, as is proved by the Accounts, the Brotherhood begin to build their Hall, which is called Drapers' Hall in 1440. There is also notice of a quit-rent of 6s. %d. paid to the Parsons of St. Swithin's for the Hall in 143 3-4 and in the following years, which probably repre- sents the 6s. id. originally owing to the Crown. Cf. the Documents quoted and abstracted in Catalogue, vol. ii, p. 38f, Drapers' Hall. ' A. viii. II J. ^ A. viii. iz6. 35*0 N.ote on Grant of the Site of The explanation of this curious and complicated transaction appears to be this : By the Charter of Henry VI (144.1) the Fraternity had been authorized to purchase lands, tenements, rents, and other possessions, while that of Edward IV had given them licence to hold lands, tenements, and rents up to the value of {p.o per annum, for the payment of their two chap- lains and other purposes. But beyond this, by the custom of London, citizens enjoyed the peculiar privilege of devising or leaving by will (though not by grant inter vivos) ' lands and tenements within the City in mortmain up to any value and without any licence. It appears that this custom was disputed at this date, since Elyas Bokkyng, a Draper, when devising a tenement to the Rector of St. Swithin's in 1410, espe- cially provided 'that if at the time of his death the citizens were prevented from devising on mortmain as of old they were accustomed ', the tenement should be sold by the Rector to four trusty parishioners for the time being and the proceeds devoted to charitable uses.^ The original intention, therefore, of the co-tenants in 14.08 had probably been that the survivor of them should devise the land in question to the Fraternity and so evade the mortmain laws. In the year 1434. (15 Henry VI), however, an Act of the Common Council forbad the enrolment of any testament of lands which had come to the devisor by a side or fraudulent testa- ment for this purpose. The Company were therefore unable to complete the transaction. As it was not proposed to attach any burdens on the possessors of the land in question, it was doubtful whether a grant of it would be covered by the terms of Edward IV's licence. Moreover, a general licence to hold in mortmain did not supersede the necessity of a special licence to the grantor to grant lands in mortmain in each case. They were therefore unable or unwilling to receive the land in that way, while a devise would have been contrary to the Act of the Common Council of 1434.. They were therefore obliged to wait, and the system of repeated re-grants was continued till 1490. In that year, however. Justice Brian ruled that citizens being freemen could devise lands to Gilds or Corporations within the City,^ and as the said lands were at that moment in the possession of one man, Eburton, they seized the opportunity to have the devise executed. The same kind of transaction was also completed at the same time ^ Stat. ly Ric. II. c. y. Apparently before that statute Gilds were allowed to receive lands by grant. ^ Sharpe, Calendar of Wills, ii. 387. ^ Roll. Abr. 555. Brian decided that this privilege only extended to citizens being freemen, not to ' foreigners ', and in Elizabeth's reign it was more plainly stated that it only referred to lands within the City. Cf. Sharpe, Calendar of WillSj i, p. xxxvii. thejirst 'Bracers' Hall 35-1 with regard to a piece of land in Candelwick Street in the parish of St. Mary Bothaw, which curiously enough had also been the property of Fitzalwyn, and for which a quit-rent of fr. was owing to the Prior of Christchurch. This site in 14.28-9 was in the hands of W. Cromer, T. Gedney, W. Weston, and Sir Thos. Cook, who were also the nominal owners of the site of Drapers' Hall. With that site it eventually and by the same process passed into Eburton's hands, who left the two properties to the Fraternity.' There are other instances of similar transactions. Thus in 1^15: Maister Cally gives lands to the Company. Maister Carter takes them over on their behalf, promising to devise them to the Company.^ In If 22 Aydrop, a Draper, devises to the Company a house which they had previously bought of Will. Haryot. Rep. 7, pp. 229, 279. Another method by which Civic companies obtained lands in mortmain was by having lands conveyed to trustees in trust to convey the same to the Company ; cf. Wm. Dammer's grant of tenements to certain persons, on trust to pay the rents to the Rentor for distribution among poor Drapers, with a proviso that, when the Company by their learned counsel are advised that they are capable by Law, the feoftees or their survivors shall transfer the estate to the Company.^ XX A THE WARDENS' ACCOUNTS. Anno dm 14.8 1-2, No. 403. ^ In tempore Thome Stalbroke Militis Magistri artis PannariorS, Johannis flfynkell, Johannis Tutsm^, Willi Isac Et Ricardi Batte Gardianoij anno xxj° Regis E<^' iiij'' a ilesto assump? bte marie virginis An° dni vt sup^ vsqj ad idm) ffestiB tuc p2 sequea sil? in An° DnD 14.82 Et an° regis pdcD xxij° This is thaccompt of John ffynkell John Tutsi^n Will^m Isac and Ric Batte Wardeins of the crafte of Drapers of London begynnyng at the ffeste of thassumpcion of oure Lady in the xxj yere of kyng Edward iiij'^" And endyng at the same ffeste of thassumpcon the xxij ycre of the same ^ Catalogue, u. 303, A. viii. 317 ; p. 392, A. viii. 121. Cf. Appendix, vol. i, No. VIII, Grant of quit-rent by Fitzalwyn. ^ Rep. 7j pp- 333 34- 3 Book of Ordinances, p. 133 ; Devise, No. 19 ; Sharpe, Calendar of Wills, i, p. xxxvii ; Livery Companies Commission, i. 13. 21 a. 35"^ The Wardens' Accounts, I48i-x kyng Which is by an hoole yere that is to say of alle their receipts and payments by reason of their office by alle the same yere. Receipts. fFyrste the seyde Wardeins chargen them to haue resseyued of Mighell Harryes John Hawkyn Ric Hawkyns and Thomas Wynham their pre- decessours Wardeins for the yere laste paste of the fFoote of their accompte Sm^ Ixxx" xj^ y'f- Spone siluer. Receiued of Ric Ryse apprentice of maister John Stocker Alderman Itm of Thomas Puppelot apprentice of Willm Peryn Itffi of Harold Stavnte apprentice of Rye Langton Itm of John Martyn apprentice of John Worsop Itm of John Dawson apprentice of Will^^m White I? of Robt Helgey apprentice of ffi) Willm Heryst Alderman Itm of Martyn Thwyng apprentice of Thomas Rysby Itm of Percevale Wodehows apprentice of Will^m Wodehows Itm of Will^m Walgrave Apprentice of Willm White Itm of Will^m Heende apprentice of Will^m White Itm of John Nychavele apprentice of Herf Eburton Itm of Waf Maykyn apprentice of John Bartelot Itm of Thomas Aleyn apprentice of Maister Drope Alderman Itm of Antony Wardolf apprentice of Will^m Browne Itm of J hn Hille apprentice of John Hille Itm of Will'^m Couper apprentice of m) § WUlm Stocker Itm of Thomas Rakon Apprentice of Will^m Sibson Itm of John Prentyce apprentice of Thomas Peende Itm of Willm Mawncett apprentice of John Jakes Itm of John Squyer Apprentice of John flynkett Itm of Her? Maldon apprentice of John ffynkett Itm of Ric Andrewe apprentice of Thomas Bronn Itm of John Halle apprentice of Petre Johnson Itm of John Townesend apprentice of Will'^m Isac Itm of Ric fFullebury Apprentice of Will^^m kendatt Itm of Piers Lewys apprentice of Rauf Genet Itm of Thomas Samptan Apprentice of Thomas Sampton Itm of WiH Shingylton apprentice of Rauf Costantyn Itm of Robt ffynkett apprentice of Willm Sibson Summa iiij'' xvj^ viij<^ Apprentyshodys. Receiued of Ric Hawkyns for Thomas Wymark iij= iiif iij^ iiijd iij^ iiij<* iij^ iHf iij= iiif iij= iiif- lif iiif ■ixf iiif \\f aif VLf mf lif iiif lif iiif Vif iiif vif mf \lf iiif lif mf xif mf ■ixf iiif lif mf Vif mf iij= iiif iij= iiif lif iiif iif mf ixf iiif iif iiif iif ' mf iif iiif iif ' iiif xiij' ' iiij^ The Wardens' Accounts^ I48i-x 35-3 Receiued of Maister White for Edmond GrevyH Receiued of Maister White for Thomas Grawicte Rec of Robt Godewyn for John Daldy Rec of Robt Godewyn for Thomas Hamerton Rec of Thomas Langrych for John Wytewang Rec of Symond Stevinson for Edmond Hayes Rec of Will^m Isac for John Wodecok Rec of Ric Isac for Thomas Wodecok Receiued of Thomas Wattys for Thomas Adam Rec of Hugh Bilby for William Sherman Receiued of John Brampston tor Robt Este Rec of John Wodechirche for Ric Harryson Rec of Kateryn Thorndon for Launceley Thirkytt Rec of Nycholas Bachiller for Thomas London Receyued of Piers Joye for Robt Walden Receyued of Thomas Dixon for Robt Massett Receiued of William Gierke for Will^m Bronn Rec of John Beauch^mp for John Steward Rec of Will^m Peende for Edward Lane Rec of Ric Chapett for Roger Melys Rec of John HiUs Chelder for John leveson Rec of Jamys Hoope for John Coo Rec of Thomas Notson for Thomas Everard Summa xvj" Receiued of John Brampston admitted by Redempcioa fo Summa iiij'" xvj^ viij"* Receiued of Raynold Ruttur for a ffyn vj^ viij"i ) „ ^ Receiued of John Bartelot for a ffyn , iij= iiij"^ ) Receiued certein personys for mynstrells money xviij^ iiij'^ Rectiued of iiij and xij personys beyng in the clothing for q^rtage xiijs iiij^ xiij^ 'u\f- xiij* 'i\\f- xiijs nif- xiijs iiij'' xiijs \xif- xiij* \xif xiij'i iiij'' xiijs iiij'i xiijs iiij'' xiijs iiij'' xrLjs iiij^ xiij* iiij'' xiijs iiij'' xiijs iiij'' xiijs iiij'' xiij= iiij'' xiijs iiij'' xiij= ilij'' xiij= ' iiij'' xiijs iiij'' xiijs iiij^ xiijs ' iiij'' Receiued of xlj personys oute of the clothmg for q^rterages Receiued of Thomas Notson It of John Tiler It of Nye Bachiller It of Ric Wotton fi of Willm Wotton It of Thom^ Hunte It of John Ilee It of John Betts It of Will»m Cowper It of John Middelton It of Willm Lewys 1603-1 Z Z iiij" xij' 55'4 ^^^ TFar dens' Accounts^ i^Si-x It of Wilt Ekyngton ItofWillmColkyn It ofTBroughton Itm of John Theer ItofRic Whitehed It of Ric Andrewe It of Thomas Cave It of Her? fFawnte It of James Hope It of Thomas Stanys It of Ric Knollys It of Petre Watson It of Rauf Genet It of Thomas Aylward It of Will^m Clerk It of Thomas Hiot It of John Banaster It of Kateryn Thorndon It of Ric Chapell It of John Ante}cnap It of Edmond Clerke It of Wa? Mower It ofWillmStryng It of Robt Smyth It of Willm Hobson It of John Cowper It of Jamys framlode ItofWillmWellys It of Jamys Nesfeld It of Rauf Costantyn Summa xlj» Receiued of certein personys for the? entre into the clotliing Rec of Thomas Langriche vj» viij"* It of John Bartelot vj» viij^ It of John Colred. vj» viij"5 It of John Bayle vj^ \\xf It ofWill^mBremong vj" viij* Itm of Rauf foderyngey vj^ viij"! Itm of Raynold Ruttur vj^ viij^ Itm of Robt Rowchester vj= viij"* Itm of John Skypw* vj^ viij* Summa iij" The Wardens* Accounts, i^Si-x i^") Receyued Of Robt Godewyn in fulle payment of A Bille of foure pounde fo, 23 a. for the dette of Thomas Strotyng xl' Receiued of Robt Manzore of A Rerage of his accompt of the tyme of John Pake and his ffelawship xxxj^ viij"! Receiued of George Bulstrede for his appntP John Wethipott xiij' iiij^ Summa totalis of alle oure Receipt? jcxxj" xj^ 'if Payments and discharges ffyrste payde to the mynstrellis for the may re Sr Will^m Heriot knyght to Westminster Iv^ iiijd Itm payde for a reward to the bargemen to Westmynster with ye SheriflTs and after with more Chawrey ageyn with the mayre aforseyd ij' iiij^ ' llm payde to Sr Thomas Appulby for Cristemas quarter xxxiij= iiij"* ' Itm to Sir Alisaundre for aystem^s (Cristemas ?) quarter xxxiij^ iiij"* 'Itm to John ffarley for a quarter wage xxv^ Itiii to the howse of Cobham in Kent for the quyte Rent goyng oute of the howse yt Gylbert ifranke dwellyd in In Cornhill as apperith by acqittaunce xxvj* viij"* Itm payd to Robt OIneys counceill for makyng of the indenture xxvj^ viij* Itm for parchement and Wax x"* Itm for brede and malvesey at the sealing of the seid indenture vij"* Itm paide to WiU^m Bremonger for bargehire at thre tymys to WestifD: xxxvj* viij^ Itm for ij billys of the chambreleyn of ApprenstishodP xx"* ^Itm payde to Will^m Bracebryg for A Res? of the Walk money viij'" x= iiij^ Itm payde to Piers Caldecot for A reward graunted by alle ye crafte vj'' xjij= iiij^ Itm for hangyng of the halle and Chamberys ij* Itm for makyng of thendentures to Her? Wodecok of Gilbert frankes hows and for drawing of noote for the Goote iij* iiij'' Itm paid to John Assh Sergeant for his ffee vj^ viij^ Itm paid for brede in this place the vj day of marche A° xxij^ j'' Itm ye same day for A Galon of Osey xij^ y' tyme beyng here maister Drope ifD Stalbroke in) sir Will Stocker maist John Stocker my maisters the Wardens & ye counceill of ye crafte Itm payde for a repaste made to Robt Olney by consent of the crafte after fo. ij b. the discression of William Sibson iiij* ' These are the two chaplains of the Company. = Their clerk. ' Money paid to repair the walls of the City, a duty imposed on the Greater Livery Companies. 35"^ The Wardens' Accounts, i^Si-x Itm paide uppon Shore thursday when my maisters ye wardeins were afore the Chamburleyn and iij or iiij mo of worshipful! men of the crafte with maister Parker for yer brekefast in an Ale hows by cause of ther longe tarying viij'^ ob Itm paide for A repaste made to Rofet Olney to her? Ashborne and to other lernyd men of his counceill by the wille and agrement of our maisters thaldremen & ye counceill of ye crafte xx^ Itm paid for hoopyng of tubbys yj'' Itm for makyng clene of the leeds and gutters abowte ye place and for carying of dust ij* Itm for paper and Inke for alle ye yere xij"i Itm for Wasshing of napery xx"* Itm we aske allowaunce for the meyrys messe mynstrells players and russhis for the halle and Chamberys vji" xiij= liij"* Itm for John ffarley for gaderyng of quarterage of men beyng oute of the clothing if Summa tot: of oure paymentP and dischargP xxxyjiJ iiij^ ob Rest due vnto the crafte Ixxxv"" vij* j'' ob Dettours to the crafte Ric Langton by a bille ensealed iiij" Cristofre Colyns by a bille ensealed xl= Itm Rauf Genet for ij apprentices xxvj» viij'^ Itm Robt Manzore for A rerage of an old accompt iij" Itm Thomas kyppyng xiij^ iiijd Itm George Bulstrode for ij Apprentices XX B THE EARLIEST RENTERS' ACCOUNTS, 148 i-z. No. 141 This is thaccompt of Symond Stephenson & Richard Stewkeley Renters of the Craft of Drapers of london of all manere Receyts & payments by them Receyued & paide of & for the Rents belonging vnto the saide Craft from the ffest of Cristemas the yere of oure lorde god m' iiij"= Ixxxj vnto the ffest of Cristemas the yere of our lorde god m' iiij* Ixxxij Sir Thomas Stalbroke knyght than beyng maister of the saide Craft John ffynkell John Tuttesham William Isaac & Richard Batte than beyng wardeyns of the same Craft Anno regni regis Edwardi quarti xxj. The Earliest Renters' Accounts, i^Si-x 35-7 Candelwyk- strete. Saint Swy- thens lane. Comhyll. Hony lane. Bowe. Candelwyk- strete. Receyts of the rents in london fErst receyued of William Dey Coke for a yere xlvj^ viijd Item receyued of John Thomson for a hole yere xx^ Summa iij" vj^ viij Item paide for the werkyng of ij<= di' & xviij"' of old lede of the saide partable gutter the C xvj'' Summa iij* vj** ob Item paide for a quarter & xv lb. of new lede to the same gutter ij« viijd Summa xlvj^ ijd Quite Rent Item paide to my lady Weldon for the postern at Drapers of Drapers hall vj' viij"^ hall. Summa patet Charges for ^rst paide to the parson of Saint Swythens for the ofFeryng of the Craft of Drapers haUe for a hole yere vj^ viij^ Drapers. Item paide to sir Alysaunder Dowdale for his Salary for mid- somer mighelmasse & Cristemas v" Item paide to John flarley for his Salary for the same iij quarters iij" xv^ Item paide to Thomas Batter atte diuerse tymes when he was in prison xiij» iiij"* Item paide to Gabriell the Clerk of Saint Mighells for the kepyng of our lady masse atte Drapers ffest and for the dirige & masse kept the same tyme ix» iiij"^ Item paide to x prests & to the Sexteyn (sexton) of Saynt mighells for the saide Dirige & masse iij' viij'^ Summa x'' viij^ Cornhyll. Item paide for the makyng of the one part of the endentures of lease of the hous which Roger Acheley now holdith vj'^ Summa patet Qmte Rent Item paide to the maister of Cobham for a hole yere xxvj' viij^ in Cornhyll. Summa patet Hony lane, ffirst paide for ix quarters of oke for a pentice (penthouse) ijs iij'^ Item paide for di' C & v fbte of quarter borde to the same xx^ Item paide to ij Carpenters for ij dayes werke of the same pentice ij* viij xiijs iiij"* Item receyued of Walter Mathew Blaksmyth for a hole yere xl^ Item receyued of Audryan Clerk for a hole yere xxvj^ viij^ Item receyued of William Vnderwode for a hole yere xx^ Item receyued of John Harrys Drayman for a hole yere xxvj' Item receyued of John Joynour for a hole yere xiij' Item receyued of Arnold Garwyn for a hole yere Item receyued of John Devyosh for a hole [yere] Item receyued of John Meller for a hole yere Item receyued of Margaret Gryffyn for a hole yere viij^ ' iiij"* xxs xxx^ viij« viij= Summa totalis receyued of the Rents in Southwerke this yere xx'" vj* Reparacions & payments done vpon the Rents in South- werke by alle the saide yere ffirst paide for iij lode of lombe (loam) xviij Payments of the Rents in Whitecrostrete this yere fErst paide to maister Robert Drope than beyng maister of the saide Craft of Drapers vj» viijd Item paide to Robert Godewyn Edmond Rigon John Hyll & John langrich than wardeyns of the same Craft xx* Item paide to the ffryer Awstens of london xxvj^ viij^ Summa totalis of all the payments in Whitecrostrete this yere liij' "ij^ So the payments is more then the Receyts of the Rents in Whitecrostrete this yere by xiij» iiij^ Vacacions of the Rents in Whitecrostrete this yere ffirst the hous which John hosyer late held voyde A quarter v" 364 The Earliest Renters' Accounts, i^^Si-x Item the hous which William Sendeby late held voyde iij quarters of A yere xv» Item the hous next the saide William Sendeby voyde a yere xx» Summa xi' Summa totalis receyued of alle the Rents in london South- werke & Whitecrostrete by alle the saide yere xlixi" x« Summa totalis paide of & for the Reparacions & payments of the saide Rents by all the saide yere xsxv^ iiij» xj"* ob' So the Receyts of all the saide Rents is more than the pay- ments this yere by xiiiji' v= ob' The wages are interesting : A carpenter id. A Dawber 8//. A Tyler id. A Dawber's man ^d. A Tyler's labourer 5^. XXI LIST OF MEMBERS, 145,3 Wardens' Accounts (No. 403, fo. 4 a). Jhesus Maria 1493 et anno regni regis henrici Septimi viij°. m' Wynham m"^ Wylcokkes m"^ Nyghtyngale m' Banast The Names of them that be of the Crafte of Drapers of london in clothing Anno 1453 • Wardeyns. Maister White Alderman & maister John Saunders Maister ffynkell Alderman John Bounde Maister Capell Alderman John Wodechirch Maister Isac Alderman John Dryland Maister ffabyan Alderman John Spylman John Beauchamp John Bramston John Tutsam John Bartelot John Langrith John Bracebryg John Hill John Banaster List of Members, 1493 ^6s John Holden Jamys Nessefeld John Skypwith John Bettes John Croke John Gierke John Squyer John Mylleborne Thomas Peend Thomas Wynham Thomas Wattes Thomas Bowan Thomas Botsell Thomas Creme Thomas Hertewell Thomas Hunte Thomas WoUesby Thomas Awbrey Thomas Notson Thomas Rathebon Laurence Aylmer Piers Joye George Bulstrode William Brogreve William Bracebryg WiUiam Shukburgh William Sybson senior William Sparke William Holme William Herist William Wylcokkes William Brotte William Edward William Nyghtyngale William Norton William Aydrop William Sibson junior William Worthyngton William Venablys William Spynk WiUiam Clerk Robert ffitzherbert Robert ffabyan ' Richard Hawkyns Richard Odyham Robert Drayton Robert Gowdeby Richard Stickeley Robert Galson Richard Tripland Rauf ftbderyngey Richard Croke Roger Achilley Richard Cloos Richard Knollys Richard Shoore Richard Wotton John Bruges Robert Wattes Harry Eburton Symond Hogan Symond Stevynson Piers Johnson Harry Axstell Edward flfynkell Symond flfypper Geffrey kend Giles Grevill Petre Watson Piers Starkey Thomas Gylbert Edmonde Brydges Thomas Wattes William Game Water Mowar Thomas Corbett William Dixon Harry Chard Thomas Carter WilUam Wotton Edward Bernard Wylliam Scochdon WylUam Lewys John Nychavell Struck out in original. l66 List of Members J 1493 William Courteman WiUiam Galley William Brogreve Robert Thyrkyll Gylbert Gentyll John Devycke Henry Patner Thomas Woodeward Edmund Burton John Browne John Witwang John Botnani Rychard Charlys John Telle Richard Andrewe John Game Henry GoUyngham Water Blaunchard Xpofer Askewe Jhesus Maria Anno 1495 the Names of men that be of the Broderhed of Drapers oute of the Clothyng Thomas Wodeward ' Edmond Grebill Edmond Medcalff Launcelet Chyrkyll Wardeyns of the Bachiillers. Harry fFabute William Cosgrave John Marchall William ffreman John Middelton Jamys Hoope John Sutton Nycholas Vycary Harry Snowe John Smalleward Thomas ffox John Anteknap Robert Tilleworth John Stokes Thomas Knottyng Thomas Say Edmond Leesson Thomas Derby Edward Johnson John Cowper Thomas Hiot Nycholas Bachiller John Tyler Richard Whitehed John Leveson John Ely John Mapulton John Wellys Harry Bagot Robert Waldyng John Cornour Richard NychoU Richard Charlys Nycholas Wyche John Baker Brian Stotisbury John Style John Wyttewang Edmond Casse John ToUe William Garett John Smyth William Wyseman Nycholas Layke Harry Patemer Thomas Richardson Richard Andrewe John Baldry Raynold Wodeshawe Arnold Babyngton Richard Lucie William Prout List of Members, 1493 3^7 Symond Auncell John Browne Edmond Burton, John Euerard Richard Ely John Dunwyche Water Maykyn Xpofer Ayskewe Symond Tiler William Mynett Stevyn flfreende John White Edmond Smyth Thomas Howe William Neele Richard Hylby William Noreys Richard Noreys John Barker Hewe Couper ' John Cheer William Sprynget Robert Oke Roger Lute Thomas Hilton John Devyk John Daske Edmond Hayes Robert flfalowfeld John Sonnyng John Wymer Robert Est John Amore Thomas Gerard Thomas Puplot Robert Helgey Martyn Thwyng Parcevall Wodehous William Heende John Hancok Water Blaunchard Thomas Vske John Betenham William Stratton Nycholas Hoo ' John Heddesdon John ffurneys John Brydge ' Richard Drynkemylk John Awedon Nycholas Heriot ' William Alman William larke Harry Colyngham Richard Prowe William Laverok John Rabyn Robert Waldyng William Soper Robert Harryes Alisamid Wellys William Saxby Robert Horneby William Chadkyrk John Game Edward Skelton Thomas Wayte XXII A WARDENS' ACCOUNTS, No. 4.03 An° dm. 15-08. An° dm. ifocj. An° 24.. An° pmo. Tempe Georgij Monoux Aldermanni ac magri mistere pannarioij london Johannis Banaster Johis Brugge Cristoferi Askue & JoBis Toll eiusdm mistere Gardianojj An° Diii. ifoS Et anno Regni RegP ' Strack out in original. fo. 85 a. 3^8 Wardens' Accounts, 15-08-9 Henrici Septitni vicesimo quarto. Et An° pmo H. octaui videlt a die lune pS post fFestQ Assumpcois btS marie virginis An° DnD & An" rrs vt sup^ vsqj ad finem ?mini vni' anni tuc px sequen. ReceytP fBrst where ou' pdecessou''' the last Wardens chargP them for the fbte of in) Monoux iR) John Milborn in) patmer and in) Wylkynson Accompt We charge vs w' the same fote and dischargP them which Am* to the Soine of xxx'' xvij* v^ I? where ou' said pdecessou''' the last Wardens chargP them for the fote of in) Hawkins m) Watson in) Carter and ifD Charlys Accompt we charge vs w' the same fote whiche Am* lxiji» I? we charge vs to haue receyved of ou' pdecessou''' the last Wardens for keping of a Just accompt for the hole fote of in) Hawkins in) Watson in) Carter & in) Charlys Accompt w' a Jewell of in) ffabyans whiche heth in plegge of v" Sm^ w' the said Jewell Am* xiij'' ix* 1? more receyved of ou' pdecessou'*" the last Wardens in redy money at ij tymes vppon the? accompt xxiiijii 1? we charge vs for the fote of ou' pdecessou''' the last Wardens accompt for keping of a due order therin xxxix^ v"* oB I? we charge vs w' a bill of John WetewangP for Willm flfowler his appn? which ou' pdecessou'^'' dd (dedit) to vs xUj* iiij"* 1? we charge vs for the fote of ii^ Monoux ifD John Milborn in) PatiS) & in) Whylkynson accompt af? a custom vif iiij<> I? we charge vs after the same Custom for the fote of Robert fEtzherberds accompt and xvj yerP past iiij'' x= j"* I? we charge vs af? the sain custom for the fote of Williii Nyghtingalys accompt & XV yerP past ix^ -^ I? of the pakkers flelliship in pty (part) of payment of xl^ due at mydsoiii) An° xxuj° xx» I? of the p)or (prior) of Elsyn Spytyll in pty of payment of Ixv" for the hous that he bought of vs and John Braybroke w' hym at ther takyng of posses- sion of the same hous sett in the old Jury in Saynt laurence layn at the ensealing of ou' WritingP about ovt [«c] lady day in lent An° xxiij" v" Itin of Walter Aprice in ptie of payment of xx"* lent to hym w' his hovs callyd the Gote to be paid ayen q?Iy euy q? xx* as apperP by his writing So am* that we haue receyved for iij q^fP endyd at mydsomer An° primo Hen" viij Sm» (Summa) iij'' Itiii of John Wetwang and Richard NychollP CoUecto'*" for Riding money and other chargP at the Beriall of King Henry the vij* xj" xvj^ viij'' And more that irO Askue & in) Toll were Sessed at x= a man Sm* xij'' xvjs viij^ I? that in) laur (Lawrence) Starky ow' for the same sessing vj» viij"! Thomas Boughe vj^ viij"i & Ric Cradok iiij^ Sm xvij' iiij"" JVar dens' Accounts , 15-08-9 369 iij^ iiij'J iij= iiij"' iij= iiij'i iij' iiij'' iijs iiijd iij^ iiij'' iij= mf iij= iiij"* Spone Syluer Rec' of Edward Mathen thappnt of Thomas Cremor I? of Robrt Nicholson thappnt of Gilbert Gentyll 1? of Stephii Thurstone thappnt of John Bartelot thelder I? of John poret thappnt of Richard CIoos I? of Thomas Stowell thappnt of John Hyll 1? of Richard Achilley thappnt of John Smyth thelder I? of Willm Hartwell Sonn of Thomas Hartwell Drap I? of John Edwyn thappnt of Willm Isaak The lyuey. Bleue and Scarlet Rec' of Jamys Bodenh^m for his Entree in to the same lyuey for dius consideracions vj= viij"^ AppntishodP Rec' of Willm Sprynget for Robert Hay ward his Appntice vj Itm of Willm Game for Rychard Ayrn vj Itm of John Wylkynson for Edward Dalby vj Itm of Thomas fSude for Rauf RokP vj' Itm of Robrt Haylys for Willm Manson Itm of Nicholas Cowper for Willm North Itm of Edmund Burton for Richard Keekwiche Itm of Gefirey Sponer for Thomas Taylyor Itm of John Banaster for Willin Kent Itm of Walter Champyon for Thomas Brade Itm of Edmund Brugge for Robrt Baker at Nele Itm of WiUm Roche for John Taylyor Itm of Thomas Bowre for Robrt Hardy Itm of in) Monoux for John Consyte . ■ . Itm of Ricfforth for Thomas Style ... Itm of Peter Watson for Walter Walcot pd in An° if 17 to m) Burton fo. 8 ix^ xvjs xvjs xvs viij"* xvs xx^ xxxiijs iiij"J ij'' viiji^ xxxiij^ iiij"* xxxiij^ iiij"* xxxiijs iiij^ xxxiijs iiij"* xvj"* xxxiij^ iiij"" xxxiijs iiij"* xviijs xviif 378 Renters* Accounts^ 15-08-9 It. of William Bother for his tenement It. of loy Joynor for his tenement by yere XVllJ* xxxiij* iiij"* S"" to" of all the Receytes am"' Ixxxxvij'' xviij^ iiij"^ The obite of henry Ebur- ton holden the xiij''' day of Juyn at Seint Mary abchirch. The discharges & paymentes. fErst paid to the iiij wardeyns It. to the parson It. to vj preestes and two clerkes It. to the Clerk for Ryngyng It. to the Wexchaundeler It. to Thomas Richardson It. for brede and ale spice wyne and chese and ) other charges J S"" xix* ij"* The Obite of Item to the iiij wardeyns Alice Har- It. to the parson It. to vj preestes and oon clerk It. to the clerk for Ryngyng It. to Thomas Richardson It. to the wexchaundeler It. for brede ale wyne chese and spices & others charges } S"xxs lewyn the xxiij day of Juyn at Seint Cristofors. vjs viijd viij<^ ijs yiijd viij"* viij"* viij^ Vljs ijii vjs viij^ xx^ 'if y\\f xij^ viij"! xij^ Vjs viljo The obite of Item to M"^ Monoux alderman John Nor- It. to the iiij wardeyns man the xvj It. to the parsone of honylane day of it_ to vij preestes and oon clerk august In j^_ ^Q ji,g sexteyne (sexton) honylane. j^ ^^ ^.j^^ wexchaundeler It. to Thomas Richardson It. to the clerk for Ryngyng gm xvijs vf iijs \x\f vjs viij"* ijs iiij"! ijs viij"' ■if xij"* viij"! viij^ The Obite of Item paid to the iiij wardeyns M"^ Hariotes It. to the parsons duputie the viij"' day It. to viij preestes & iiij clerkes iiij* of ffebra at for to drynk x"* S"" seint dun- It. to xxj pore people stonys in the Est. and more) iiij' viij"* lujs x" xxj* M^ harriot. Robert Sir Micholat Westmor- land. Sir Pike. M'^Eburton. Mr. Boundes preest. Robert Brigges. Richard Stnkeley. William Ai thorp. Geffrey Kent. Thomas hey ward. Thomas Payne. Hugh Mitton. Renters' Account Sy 15-08-9 379 It. to the wexchaundeler for wax and candilles It. for ryngyng of Belles It. to Richardson It. to iij Almos men in drapers hall It. to Raynold xyj"" xiij^ iiij'' S" xiiijs ix" v" v^ V m KS Paymentes for preestes Salary fHrst paid to Sir William Clynch for his salary for iij quarters Also paid to Sir Thomas Box for his wages for thre quarters Also paid to Sir Nicholas for his wages fori V wekes service & the Remniant of that quarter was void Also paid to Sir Nicholas Pyke for di yere within) the tyme of this accompt J Also paid to Maister Eburton chaplein for a] quarter endyng at midsomer a° xxiip' henry I the vij"" at the goyng out of that service J Item paid to Thomas Richardson for his wages) for iij quarters of a yere J iij'' xv= Also paid to Reynold Sampton for his wages for) iij quarters j Also paid to Mr Boundes preest for oon quarter Item paid to Robert Brigges for his almosse for j a quarter endyng at midsomer a° xxiij h. vij \ & than he died ) Item paid to hym for his wages for iij quarters xjs viij"' xxxiij= \\xf xxxiijs iiij"i xys ijd Item paid to hym for his Almose for iij quarters iij quarters Item paid to hym for his almose for th e hol e yere ) and than deceessed J Item paid for brede and ale at Drapers hall at^ the wardeins commaundement whan the said [ Geffrey was buried goven to the ffeliship J Item paid to hym for his almosse for iij quarters) of this accompt J Item paid to hym for his almose for iij quarters Item paid to hym for the masse of our lady and) for Ryngyng J xls Xls xxxvjs viij"* xij" xxx* XX? x' gSo Renters^ Accounts^ 15-08-9 Item paid to xij preestes and ij clerkes for derige) and masse of Requiem ) Item to the sextein for erbes and floures to straw) the pewes J Item paid for the maisters dynner & wardeyns\ both olde and newe with their Counceile at such tyme as thei went to oversee their landes and tenementes at the signe of the Cristofer in cheapeside Seint Cristofers parisshe. W^ Weldon. Abchirch. William Rygby. Bosotnes Inne. Seint Mathew in fridaystrete. Seint Awstyns beside Cantirbury. Cristes Church in london. ffynesbury. honylane. Item paid for a lode of colys & money geven in- almose to the pour folk of the said parissh and to the almose men of the said ifeliship of drapers S" xxxvij'' Vif Quyterentes fBrst paid to her for quyterent oute of Drapers) hall for the hole yere of this accompt j Item paid to the wardeyns of the said chirche] for a yerely Quyterent of a chymney in the \ parlour in Drapers hall J Item paid to hym for a yerely quLtrent out of the tenement called the Gote In Cheapeside for the yere of this accompt Item paid for a quiterent oute of M' hawys place fo the yere of this accompt Item to the Church Wardeins there for quiterent oute of the corner tenement at Bow chirch for the yere of this accompt Item for quiterent oute of the londes and tene-] ments In Southwerk for the yere of this^ accompt J Item paid for the londes and tenements in Saynt Mary Bothowe parish in Candilwykstrete for ■ the said yere Item paid for quiterent of the landes & tenements in Whitecrossestrete of this yere passed Item to the Church Wardeins In hony-lane paid for the Beamelight for the yere of this accompt paiable at Mighelmas iiij' viij'' viij"" xij' viij"* xiij' iiij"* xx= xij'^ xxvj* viij"* xs xx^ xxij* ys xiij* iiij"* viij"^ iili vjs viij"^ Renters' Accounts, 15-08-9 381 Seint Item paid to the parsone there for the Offeringes\ Swithune. of Drapers hall for the yere of this accompt at I • mighelmas J vj' Seint Mary Item paid for quiterent oute of the tenements Overeys. Gote In the cheape for the hole yere paiable [• at mighelmas and our lady day in lent ] luj The Crafte Item for a quiterent oute of the landes and tene- of talow- ments at Dowgate for the yere of this accompt chaundelers. endyd at our lady day in lent Evysham. Item paid to the abbot of Evysham for the patronage of Seint mighelles Church in Cornehill for di. yere Seint Item paid for quitrent for the londes and tene- James in the ments in Bassyngeshawe for the yere of this ffelde. accompt at oure lady day in lent j xx» Seint Item to the Chirche Wardeyns there for the^ Johanes in quiterentes oute of the londes and tenements I Walbroke. at dowgate for this yere paid at midsomer ) xiij= iiij^ The Collage Item for quyterent oute of the landes and tene- of Cobham. ments In Cornehill at our lady day in lent for the yere of this accompt J xxvj= viij-i Item paid to the Colectors for the kynges money) for drapers hall I xviij= Sm. xvij'i iij" v^ liij' iiij'^ S"' liiij'' iiij» S"" xvij'' iij= V Reparaciones M^ hawys. ffirst to a Tiler after vnf a day and his laborer' after V^ a day for viii* dales werk for tylyng the hall chambres and makyng a new berth In the Kechyn Item paid for iiij lodes of sand at vi^ p' lode sm. It. paide for iij lodes of lyme at ix^ the lode Item for a lode of breeke Item for a grate of Iron for the Gutter weing) yjijib jd Qb. a lb sm. ) Item paid to a mason for iij dales work for mak-| yng of the synk that goith into Bosomes Inne J It. paid for vj fote of gutter stone for the said) synk at iiij"^ the fote ) Item to a laborer for iij dales there viij- ij= ij^ ij= VllJ iid iij"! iid XI] iid 38x Renters' Accounts^ 15-08-9 Item for a lode of lyme ix'' It. for a lode of sand to the same werkes vj"* this iiijs is lt> for ij negjftc e gof Iron fora£lfl fi Bgwyndowe» - not allowed i»¥iT5mttO Koloc hous e' — f iiij* here. S. rx. ^j. Item for a new case of tymbre for the grete) cestren in the Kechin for stuf & werkmanshipj viij' It. for casting of vij<= di of olde lede at xiij^ the^ C. to Thomas child plummer \ viij^ j^ ob It. for a cok of brasse to the same cestren ij' viiji^ Item for a pipesend over the sinke weing xiiij^'' viij'' ob Item to Thomas childe plummer in partie of^ payment of 1 lb. Sowder after v"^ the lb. s" xx^ x"* for the newe cisteren in M"^ hawes hous. So restes due to the plummer xvj' x"* 'whichl Rest 'Was faid by M"^ Toll, & Bernard paid hut I iiif of the said xx' x^ ) iiij^ Candilwik- It. for xxij fote of hard stone for the pavyng o{\ strete. the Kechin there at v"^ the fote with laying of I the same ) ix^ ij-^ It. for ij lodes of lombe to the same werkes viij'' It. for a laborer iij dales xv'^ It. for ij'= sap lath viij"* It. for m' sprig for mendyng of walles vj'' It. for iij lodes of lombe xij'^ It. for a lode of lyme & a lode of sonde xiiij^ It. to John Thurston dawber and his laborer for) iiij dayes | iiij^ iiij"^ S, 4.1. d, 3 Item for a lode of Breke to perfourmyng the) Kechyn flore and mending of the hirth J ij' ij"' Item for carying away of iiij lode of Robous viij'' Item for half a dayes labour of a werkman to) make the berth and lay the breke J iiij* S-" ■ Rcparacionoi Paten Patensons house fErst to a tyler and his laborer iij dayes in Tylyng^ the said house & makyng a new berth In the j- chamber next the Strete ) iij» iij* It. paid for viij Roof tile to the said house vj* S, 6. d, ii The Corner hous in cheape side. Renters' Accounts, 15-08-9 383 Item paid to John Thurston dawber and his laborer there iiij dayes for mendyng the flores and wasshyng the walks Item for iij lodes of lombe Item for iij Sakkes of lyme It. for ij lb Sawder occupied In the gutters \ Item paid to a mason for makyng of two new herthes oon In the kechyn an other In the . celler and for mending of a towaile of a Sege ' It. for cariage of a lode of Robous awey (rubbish ^ away) f S, 7. d, 7. iiij' iiij"* xij"* iiij"* xjo The Bull In Smythfeld. fErst paid for vi"= lathe Item paid for ij m' Sprig Item paid for di m' Sprig Item for iiij lodes of lombe Item to John Thurston dawber & his laborer for) iiij dales dawbyng the walles there | Item for Voide of xvij ton ordour oute of two) seges the ton xij"* sm. Item to a man for wachyng there two nyghtes Item for xij hopes for the grete yellyng Tonnes) price the pece vj"* sm. | Item for leyng of lede upon the same yeldyng) Tonnes I Item for paid to a Carpenter for mending of the j wyndowes in the middyll parlour & setting up !■ of a grete in the sege house di day ) S" S, 34.. d, j. Reparacions at Drapers hall. Item paid to a Tyler and his laborer there for v dayes werk for Tyllyng the hall the parlour and the Almose men houses ijs xij" nf xvj^ iiij' iiij'' I xvij' xvj" VJ» vji iiij"" ys v^ ' A water-closet. 384 Renters' Accounts, 15-08-9 Item for iij lodes of lyme Item for iij lodes of Sand Item for Cariage awey of iij lodes of Robous Item for a litle laddyr for the ladys chambre Item for iij hokes of Iron to hang on the grete) laddyr weyng v lb di. jd ob the Ib.'sm. | It. paid for a new key to the wykket S" S, II. d, I. The Gote in Cheape. Item paid to William Carpenter for xxxij'' fote oA Tymbre that made postes and bases in thel- celler there and warehouse to here up a flore J Item fo C di of v^ naile Item to the same William for iiij dales werk forV settyng up the said postes and baces ] Item paid for a new lok and a key to the Bakk) dore J Item paid for a bolt of Iron to the Inner dore Item paid to John Thurston dawber for half a) daies labour to cover the Sege ) Item for ij lodes of lombe to the same werk S, 5». d, II Item to a Tyler and his laborer for iij daieS' Tylyng the chambres and for makyng of a new herth in the Kechyn and mendyng the wall In the dry ware house It. for ij lodes of lyme Item for x roofe Tyles for the garret Chamber Item for ij lodes of Sand Item to a laborer to make clene their chambres) cellers and gutters for iij daies J Item for cariage of vj lodes of Robous awey S" S, 8. d, 8. Reparacions at Seint laurence lane Item for a lode of pavyng Stone with the cariage Item paid for paving of two taice (days ?) werk di It. for a lode of gravell S- ij' iij^ xviij^ VJd viij"" vs Vjo if vuj" viij^ iiij"* y\xf IIJ' iij* xviij"* viij* xij* xv" xij'' xvj" xvij** ob iiij* Dowgate. Renters' Accounts, 15-08-9 1%^ Reparacions at Whitcrossestrete Item paid to a Tyler and his laborer iij daies for Tylyng of the Bochers houses Sj 6. d, 4.. m. 1 Item for a lode of lyme and ij lodes of sand Item for cariage of iiij^ tyle from Smythfelde Item paid to laurence Baily pavior for pavyng of V taice werk in the strete there at vij'^ the taice sm. Item for iiij lodes of pavyng stone with the cariage therof Item for vj lodes of gravell to reyse the same) werkes J Item for clensyng of the diche to convey his) water ) Item for a newe bokete to the well gm xvijn v fl S, 14.. d, 2. Item for makyng of iij dores and oon wyndowe' and benches and nailes and other stuff" and workemanship of the same ij keyes ij lache s & c a ctie s and a ring toa dore II for ij new lokkes and ij cachis & a ryng to a dore keyes ij lachis &1 iij» iij"* ij' ix"* ij« xj-^ V" ij" Vllj" viij'^ V vj"* ob Reparacions at Seint donstons. Item paid for a paire of new henges to the) wykket to the grete place there j Item paid for iiij"^ naile therto Item paid for vj Rakkes to hang upon clothes in^ flforsters house for tymber and werkmanship J Item In x"* naile for the same iiij"* ij' ■if S, ID. d, I m Reparacones of Southwerk Item paid for a dog of Iron and nailes to hold In the sege house at the Bell wharf weyng vij lb di ix" ?D gSd Renters^ Account s^ 15-08-9 Item paid for a case of bordes to dose In a pipe) of lede in Brigg house lane J Item for a new lok and a key for the store house dore Item geven In Ernest to the mason for making of Chymneys Item paid to Thomas Byrt lyman for xx** Ton of chalk at vj"* a Ton Item paid for a whele Barowe Item paid for takyng up of the payment and cariyng In of the Stones and Gravell ij dales a laborer S, 14. d, I. Id) x» VUJ" vij"* J" xiiij'' x* Sm. payd by M^ Toll xvj' iij'^ Item to Thomas Brete in partye of payment of^ the jc tii jlmf X lbs tohenf paid Ij Bernard xxt ix" lyme pee A Restes to hym xxv» that A f«d> i hf M' Toll faid afterward J Item paid for mendyng of iij olde lokkes and a new key Item for mendyng of ij lokkes for the grete gate and to oon of them a new key Item to John Thurston for mendyng the walles In the tenement next Brigge house lane for a dales werk Item for a lode of lombe there occupied Item for iij sakkes of lyme Item paid to William Cull mason for dyggyng. and makyng of the foundacion of the KechynsI and under pynnyng the Grounselles • there by r Cennement j Item for viij m' of roof naile for the Tylyng of| the Kechynes [ ) Richard RoyTW Smyth in Southjrikk fori for v« iiij^ nayleHgr doores & wynddv ' The timber foundation. xx» Vilj"* Viijd viij'' iiij"* iiij* xiij»ix4 Renters* Accounts, 15-08-9 387 Item more paid to the said Smyth by Ed. Barnard) for ijo of iijd nayle J It. more for xvj m' sprygge S, 44. d, 9. iiij** viij* iiij» vj* viijd Item for iij Busshill of tile pynnes Item paid to a Tyler for laying of viij m> tyle viij» Item to John Thurston dawber for ij werkmen by) vj daies werk J viij» S, 17. d, J. XV" Item to iij laborers for vj daies mtftid, IteiBsto ThomasJWalshe Sandeman for xvj fofley of sJhd^^*5^^a lode ^^.^■^""^ ) not pud. Item ^jvhym'^Qr xix lodes of lombpibfnie walks ) particion^^ iiii** the Jed^sm. ) Item to Thomas Aleynson Tyle maker In partie of payment of x m^ Tyle had into Southwerk for the vij new kechinges after iiij» vj"* the m' Sm paid by Ed. Barnard Item paid for Cariage of xij lood Breke to Thomas) Galyam in to Southwerk J Item for iij" hcrt lath for the litle kechynV In the Comer J xv" Item for a pek of Tyle pynnes j* ob Item to a loborer for ix daies iij* ix* Item paid to John henley lyme man) for iij" and di lyme at v» the c sm.; xvij» vj^ S, ji. d, I m. vi]» vj" viij* V]» llll" xv» vj* nhidi vj' M*" Buniuter & John Bnige & that Con^any gw^ t» pay for yt was of the irxik. ''"' ^ hmght of John Baynards cartage free & therfor they ihall reply the laid vjs ir therfor see yt put in ther ac-' con^ among there reseytett 388 Sandetnan. Plummer. Glasier. Gote. Gote. Dowgat. Dowgat?. Saynt Swy- thunys layn. Renters'" Accounts, 15-08-9 Item to the Sand man at the Tower hyll for xx) loodes sand at v'f a lode sm ) Item for my wages for a hole yere ended at our) lady day in lent A° p)dci Jiiij" Item for potacions upon the Tenements for this yere Item for paper and Ink and makyng of this accompt X» vjd xuj» mj' i* VJ» VllJ \i XS vj*' \^ XllJ' lllj' xlvij' viij* iiij" x» Also there is owen to the sandman Thomas Walshe for xvj lode of sand vij» vj"" and for xix lodes of lombe vj» i^xf Sm. Also there is owen to henry Tarsey plummer as it appereth by his bill Also to the Glasier in flfynkes layne — To""' li ao S. II. d y m for Reparacions Wages Potacions etc. Vacacions ' fBrst the said aecomptannt asketh allowauncc for the tenement Gote charged at ix^* by yere geven to Miles Broun half yeres rent endyng at mighelmas xxiij h. the vij* Item the same tenement Gote letten to Walter ap Rice for x" by yere and voide the quarter from mighelmas to Cristemas Also a tenement parcell of the grete house at' dowgate the upper part charged at xiij» iiij"* by yere voide from mighelmas to our lady day Annunciacion that is half yere Also a litle shop that is parcell of the said upper' part charged at xiij» iiij'^ by yere voide all the yere of this accompt Also there resteth in the handes of Richard Call' for a hole yere and a quarter endyng at our lady day aforsaid for oon tenement after xxiij» '\\\f by there li, 5. S, p. d, 1. vj» viij" xiij' iiij° XXIX' 1]' id N.B. — The wages are the same as in 1481-1 : a Tiler, a Mason, a Carpenter 8rf. a day, a labourer jrf. a day. ' The number of tenements vacant is striking. Probably due to the sweating sickness, which was severe about that time. Saynt Swy- thunys layn. Southwark. Southwark. Southwerk. Southwark. Southwerk. Renters* Accounts y 15-08-9 389 Also resteth In the handes of the said Richard' for an other tenement after xxiij* iiij^ by yere for a quarter endid at our lady day Also the tenement that Cloyse Joy nor held In> Southwerk at xvj» by yere voide half yere at I our lady day | Also a tenement that William Besom held at xv» by yere voide all the said yere Also the tenement that henry Godfrey held at xx» by yere voide the forsaid di. yere Also the tenement that henry Clerk now dwelleth In at xviij» by yere voide iij quarters Also the tenement that Corneles dwelt In at' xviij* by yere voide from our lady day to mighelmas that is half yere Sm. of Vacacions xij" x» vj^ v» Vllj* XV' xiij» vj° IX" li, 3. s, I. d, 4. li 33 6i I d \U ta Rest there that Barnard oweth by this accompt awayted by M' hawkins M' Cremor M' Rudstone & M' Askue x» xij» liift ob i wherof must be rebated for ij cases Iron for glase wyndeos in Keelles hous iiij» Restes x"* viij» ob By me Richard hawkyns Be me T. Cremor Be me John Roudstone By me Cristofer Askew S™ to'' paid Ixxxvij" v* xj^ Oxford : Horace Hart M.A. Printer to the University a a t>Tfflj>»j i OijA:ia ii a ^i*iMM«ai>! mtwHrtitiiWumi uai ii ii