PR PR The Authorship of A Warning for Fair JVomen BY JOSEPH QUINCY ADAMS, JE. [Reprinted from the PuificaftOTU q/' tKt Modem Langwigt Anoeiation a/ Ameriea, xxviii, 4.] The Modern LA.NOuAaE Association of Amebica 1913 S A.t-g'fM'f W Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924013127349 THE AUTHORSHIP OF A WARNING FOR FAIR WOMEN A Warning for Fair Women was published anonymously in 1599, with the statement on the title-page that it had been "lately diuerse times acted by the right Honorable the Lord Ohamberlaine his Seruants." The attribution of the play by Edward Phillips to John Lyly is too absurd for serious consideration.^ Almost as absurd is Collier's attribution of the -play to Shakespeare.^ Fleay suggested Thomas Lodge,* though not without hesitation, for he adds the warning: " I cannot state too emphatically that any attri- bution of this play to Lodge is conjectural, and founded less on positive evidence than on the method of exhaus- tion." The "method" referred to is ,thus explained: " The other writers for the Chamberlain's men at this time were Shakespeare and Jonson. Objectors to my hypothesis of Lodge's authorship may adopt one of these, or (the usual resource) imagine some unknown playwright not elsewhere heard of." But Lodge was probably not engaged in play-writing at this time ; so that according to '^ Theatrum Poetarum (1675), p. 113. Phillip's attributions of anonymous plays were usually due to his misunderstanding of certain early catalogues of plays. Winstanley, in The Lives of the Most Famous English Poets (1687), p. 98, blindly repeats, as was his custom, the attribution of Phillips. The attribution was again re- peated by Wood, Athenm Owonienses, 1691 (ed. Bliss, 1813, 1, p. 676). Bond, in his edition of Lyly, does not discuss the attribution; appar- ently he regarded it as unworthy of notice. ' Eist. Eng. Dram. Poet., iii, pp. 52-4; II, p. 441. Collier, however, felt sure of his attribution. Of one scene he says : " Aut Shake- speare, aut diabolus." 'Biog. Chron. Eng. Drama, n, pp. 54-5. Cf. also his Ohron. Hist, of the Life and Work of Wm. Shah., pp. 35, 136, 297. 594 ATJTHOBSHIP OF A WAENIITG FOB FAIE WOMEN 595 Fleay's " method " we should be forced to choose between Shakespeare and Jonson. Naturally Fleay's conjecture has not been favorably received by scholars.^ Professor Ward, in his History of English Dramatic Literature, i, p. 418, sees " no sufficient reason for noticing " such a " conjectural attribution to Lodge " of a play which hardly falls " within the period of his ascertained dramatic activity " ; and the writers in The Cambridge History of English Literature entirely ignore it. After a prolonged study of A Warning, and a comparison of it with the extant plays of Lodge, I can discover no points of similarity either in manner or in spirit. To me the attribution to Lodge seems quitei as improbable as the attribution, to Lyly, Thus, the three persons hitherto suggested for the au- thorship of the play fail to satisfy, and none has been even, tentatively accepted by scholars. Yet A Warning assuredly was written by a dramatist of ability and experience. Its editor, Richard Simpson, says : ^ "It is perhaps the most noteworthy of a whole class of plays, those, namely, which dramatize murders " ; and Professor Ward (C. H. E. L., vi, p. 109) describes it as " a notable play of its kind." ISo inexperienced hand could have turned the thin and dull pamphlet of 1573 ' into such a well-constructed and effective tragedy. We must, I take ^Schelling, in his Elizabethan Drama, i, p. 346, says: "This play has been attributed, solely on internal evidence, to Lodge," by M. E. N. Fraser, in an unpublished thesis. University of Pennsylvania, 1898. I have sought in vain for the " internal evidence " here re- ferred to : Qy. for " internal " Schelling meant to say " external,'' i. e., Fleay's argument. 'The School of Shakespeare, u, p. 211. 'A Brief Discourse of the Late Murther of Master Cfeorge Scmn- 4ers, London, 1573. 596 JOSEPH QUINCY iLDAMS, JB. it, look for the author among the better known playwrights of 1595-8. No one, so far as I -can discover, has suggested as the author of the play the versatile and industrious Thomas Heywood. Yet on reading A Warning immediately after a year's close study of Heywood's works, I felt convinced that he was responsible for its composition. Of Hey- wood's life at this early period we know little, and that little we are forced to glean from Henslowe's Diary. Mr. Greg, in his Commentary on the Diary, under " Hay- wood," says (p. 284) : " He was probably employed as a writer by the Admiral's men as early as 1594. He is first mentioned as an author 14/29 Oct. 1596 when Hens- lowe lent certain of the Admiral's men 30s. ' for hawodes bocke.' He was again writing for the same company in the winter of 1598-9." So far as we know, however, he did not become a regular actor for the Admiral's men until March 25, 1598, when he bound himself to Henslowe for a period of two years. Possibly before that date he was free to sell a play to any other company ; it is even possible that his relations with Shakespeare's company led Hens- lowe to engage him in a regular capacity. At any rate, if enough internal evidence is produced to show that Heywood, in all likelihood, wrote A Warning, no very serious objection can be raised from the rather slender information we have concerning his relations with Hens- lowe before 1598. My reasons — at least such reasons as are tangible and can be put on paper — for believing that Heywood wrote A Warning are as follows: 1. In 1597-8, Heywood was an experienced play- wright, well able to turn the meagre prose pamphlet of The Late Murther of Master George Saunders into so AUTHOESHIP OF A WAENING FOE FAIE WOMElf 597 good a drama as A Warning. He had already written several successful plays, including the Ages, and his extra- ordinary skill in handling domestic tragedy was shortly to be revealed in A Woman Killed with Kindness. 2. The play belongs to a type — the domestic drama — in which Heywood was peculiarly at home. The Rev. Eonald Bayne, writing in The Gamhridge History of English Literature, v, p. 362, says of A Warning: " It is so steeped in English lower class sentiment and feeling that it will always possess interest and value." Now it is precisely this element that Heywood contributed in full measure to his plays. On this point another scholar, Professor Ward, in the Same volume (C H. E. L., vi, pp. 107-8) says: "In a period of the national history when the middle classes were beginning to assert themselves in the social system of the country ... it could hardly be but that room should have been found in the drama for exposition of the middle class point of view, middle class morality and middle class humanity. . . . Shakespearie, whose muse was at home on the throne of kings, in the strife of battlefields, or in communion with nature in her moods of elemental agitation or of woodland cabn . . . was not responsive to this movement, and, indeed, appears to have been very imperfectly aware of it. . . Jonson, and his school — including Middleton — on the other haind, treated such griefs and their agents or victims from the point of view of critical superiority. . . . Heywood, in many ways specially attracted and suited to this genre, is the only Elizabethan dramatist of note who attained to eminence in it." Thus in its full and sympathetic reve- lation of lower class sentiment and feeling, A Warning bears the stamp of Heywood's peculiar genius. 3. The style of A Warning is throughout strongly suggestive of Heywood. There is the same general level 598 JOSEPH QUINCT ADAMS, JB. of excellence, the same easy-flowing, tHough rarely in- spired, blank verse, the same lack of rich or violent ima- gery, or of attempts at the Marlovian " mighty line." It is hard to be specific in a matter of this sort. I appeal, however, with confidence to students of Heywood, who, I am sure, will recognize in A Warning the eveiii flow of the "prose Shakespeare." Certain tricks of style can be more readily pointed to, Buch as frequent patches of rhyme, the free mixture of prose and verse, the fondness for balance and for euphu- istic passages. Compare the patch of rhyme in A Warn- ing, I, 242-272, with similar patches in any of Heywood's earlier plays. Note the euphuistic coloring of the follow- ing passage in A Warning (i, 4Y1-4Y5) : ^ If he be firm, she's fair; if he bountiful She's beautiful; if he loyal, she's lovely; If he in all the city for a man Be the most absolute, she in all the world Is for a woman the most excellent. Again (i, 154-5) : Let your good nature hide The blame of my bad nurture. Heywood is childishly fond Tt is not millions that can ransom thee. — Warning, n, 500. All the gold in Cheapside cannot ransom her. —K. Ed. IV. (I, p. 16). Kil him? Yea, were his life ten thousand lives. Not any sparke or cinder of the same Should be vnquencht in bloud at thy request. g, n, 441-3. But thou hast kill'd a man, whom to have sav'd, Had I a thousand lives, I'd lose them all. — O. /. B. (v, p. 61).* For all this world I would not. — Warning, n, 1051. Not for the world. —Four P. (II, p. 184) ; F. M. W. (II, p. 380). Not for a world. — C. f. B. (v, p. 33). Al the world's wealth could not intioe me too't. ' —Warning, II, 1128 (Cf. also ll, 492; n, 537). Al London's wealth . should not. — Warning, n, 862. I'de not change it for the wealth of Italy. —F. M. W. (n, p. 402). That more contents me than the wealth of Spain. —C. f. B. (v, p. 37). The phrase was a favorite one with Heywood. > Cf. I will not wrong her for a thousand pound. — Warning, i, 211. >Cf. also I, 67; n, 127, 140, 146, 273, 324, 357, 364, 383; v, 192; etc. AtJTHOESHIP OP A WAEimirG FOE FAIE WOMEW 617 Beare with this true and home-borne Tragedy Yeelding so slender argument and scope To build a matter of importance on. — Wa/mmg, n, 1704-6 (Epilogue). They [i. e., foreign playwrights] do not build their projects [i. e., plays] on that ground. — G. f. B. (v, p. 3) (Prologue). Not only is the general idea similar, but the phrase " to build upon " is exceedingly common in Heywood, for it is one of his stock ways of expressing himself. It appears again in A Warning, i, 435 : ^ Thy trust it is I build upon. Of. Heywood: Whose loyalty we now must build upon. —R. K. L. 8. (VI, p. 30). I build upon thy council. — I. A. ( m, p. 410). I do build upon your secrecy. — F. M. E. (n, p. 36). On her behaviour I will build my fate. —F. M. W. (n, p. 290). Likewise in Cap., 135, 182; i, 145; ii, 45, 124, 224; III, 43, 293, 324, 399, 40Y ; iv, 64, 103 ; v. 172 ; vi, 402 ; etc. Or think it in a heart did never harbour. — Warnmg, il, 754. The dearest thoughts that harbour in this breast. —K. Ed. IV. (I, p. 130). How like a fatal comet did that light With this portentous vision fright mine eyes! — Warning, n, 134. And these shall like a bloody meteor show. More dreadful than Orion's flaming locks, T'affright the Giants that oppress the earth. —S. A. (in, pp. 131-2). 7 618 JOSEPH QUINCT ADAMS, JE. Like a blazing comet that foretells the fall of princes. —Four P. (n, p. 212). It shows like a red meteor in the troubled air. —Fowr P. (n, p. 212). He doth not live dare charge me with it. — Wa/rnmg, n, 1028. Breathes there any living dares say . . . — B. M. C, p. 80. There lives not in this land Can touch me with the thought of murther. — Warning, n, 943-4. Than you, air! he lives not. — F, M. E. (n, p. 27). There lives not one more free and sociable. —F. L. 8. (VI, p. 366). Pretus. Treason! Our guard. Perseus. Lives there a man, the tyrant Pretus dead . . . —S. A. (m, p. 94). Lives there a King that would . . —K. Ed. IV. (I, p. 65). Liv'd there such a, creature, would not . . . —0. f. B. (V, p. 31). Soules health. — Warning, n, 1593. This not uneommon phrase appears frequently in Hay- wood; see K. Ed. IV.. (i, p. 54), W. W. H. (v, p. 351), H. M. C. (p. 15), etc. Must wade through blood t' obtain my vile desire. — Warning, ii, 101. This idea is very frequent in Heywood: And my desire Shall wade with thee through blood. — B. A. (iii, p. 219). Like-wise 0. A. (m, p. 8), F. M. W. (ii, p. 357), R. of L. {v, p. 186), etc. Were they ten, mine arme is strong enough. — Warning, n, 461. AUTHOBSHIP OF A WAENING FOB FAIE WOMEN 619 Were you teii| knights. — W. H. H. (v, p. 342). Wert thou ten Hectors. — 7. A. (m, p. 294). In A Warning, Browne says to Misstress Drury that unless he can enjoy Mistress Sanders he will die, and he begs her to help him. She responds (i, 254-6) : This I say — I cannot make a man. To cast away So goodly a creature as yourself were sin. Accordingly she grants his request. ' The same idea ap- pears in one of Heywood's plays, but I am unable to locate the passage. Note, however, the following: That claim we, as we're men, we would but live; Then take not from us what you cannot give. —G. A. (m, p. 74). A hundred thousand pound cannot make a man. — /. K. N. M. (I, p. 321). The author of A Warning refers to the interior of the theatre as a "round." This is quite natural, yet it is at least worth noting that Heywood was fond of the idea : All this fair circuit. — Warning, l, 83. Many now in this Round. — Warnmg, I, 88. Tliis theatre round.— 0. /. B. (v, p. 66). If then the world a theatre present, As by the roundness it appears most fit. — Apology (p. 13). Within this circumference. — Four P. (n, p. 166). In his speech from the scaffold, Browne says {Warning, n, 1447-8): Vile world, how like a monster come I soyld from thee! How have I wallowed in thy loathsome filth, etc. No authority for this appears in the prose pamphlet. But Heywood was fond of making his characters at the point of death address with reproaches the "World personified. 620 JOSEPH QUINCY ADAMS, JE. Thus, in 0. f. B. (v> p, 68), Bonavide, at the moment of execution, says: Farewell, world, Growne so corrupt . . . And in 7. A. {in, p. 421), Egistus, dying, says: Vain world, farewell! In L. M. (v, p. 100), Psiche, standing on top of a rock and ready for death, says : " Vain world, adieu." In K. Ed. IV. (i, p. 181), Shore, on the point of death, apostrophizes the world: " world, what are thou ? man, even from his birth Finds nothing else but misery on earth, Thou never (World) scorndst me so much before; But I, vain World, do hate th^e ten times more. I am glad I see approaching death so nie; World, thou hatest me: I, thee, vain World, defile.' I have not recorded here all the similarities in phrase- ology or in ideas that I have observed, and another student of the play, I have no doubt, could point out many more. However, I have given enough, I hope, to show that the lines in A Warning may have come from the brain of Heywood. I am confident that the scholar, in passing from a reading of Heywood's plays to a reading of A Warning, will be unconscious of any change in style. Indeed, there is, it seems to me, less difference of style between this play and the typical work of Heywood than is to be found between some of Heywood's acknowledged plays. If we grant that Heywood at some time during the years 1595-8 was free to write for the Lord Cham- berlain's servants, I see no reason why A Warning should not be assigned to his pen. Joseph Quiwct Adams, Jr. 'Likewise, on page 183, he exclaims: "Oh unconstant World! " Cornell University Library PR2411.W28A21 The authorship of A warning for fair worn 3 1924 013 127 349 '^^ W^j'