m>m;r.:,i\i:!;,-,:"ji-,im ?/3 BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF HettrQ M. Sage 1891 (^.51^.^.^.3 \m\\± 3777 p nieuaie snows wiien this volume was taken. To renew thisibook co|^.the call No. and give to '^ ' ■ I the librarian. ^^__^^_ : HOME U^ RULES. ■ All Books lubiect to Recall. AH books must be returned at end of col- lege year for inspec- tion and irepairs. . Students must re- turn all books* l^efore leaving town. Officers should arrarigfe for the return of books wanted during -thSir .absence ftrom; town. Fooks needed by more than one person afe held on the reserve • list. Volumes of .periodi- cals and of p^imphlets are held ii) the library _ as much as possible. ~- For, special ■ purposes they are given out .foi* a limited time. 'Borrowers should not use their library privileges for the bene- fit of other perfOns. , i Books of special value and' gift books, whefl the giVer wishes it, are not'-allowed to. circulate. * V Readers are asked to report all cases of books marked or muti- lated. . » Do not deface books by marks and writing. Cornell University Library HF5386 .P13 Trade morals, their origin orowth and pr 3 1924 032 402 616 Clin Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924032402616 TRADE MORALS PAGE LECTURES Published by Yale University Press MORALS IN MODERN BUSINESS. Addresses by Edward D. Page, George W. Alger, Henry Holt, A. Barton Hepburn, Ed- ward W. Bemis and James McKeen. (Second printing) 12rao, cloth binding, leather label, 162 pages. Syllabi. Price SI. 25 net, delivered. EVERY-DAY ETHICS. Addresses by Norman Hapgood, Joseph E. Sterrett, John Brooks Leavitt, Charles A. Prouty. 12mo, cloth binding, leather label, 150 pages, index. Price $1.25 net, delivered. INDUSTRY AND PROGRESS. By Norman Hapgood. 12mo, cloth binding, 123 pages. Price $1.25 net, delivered. POLITICIAN, PARTY AND PEOPLE. By Henry C. Emery. 12mo, cloth binding, 183 pages, index. Price $1.25 net, de- livered. QUESTIONS OF PUBLIC POLICY. Addresses by J. W. Jenks, A. Piatt Andrew, Emory R. Johnson and Willard V. King. 12mo, cloth binding, leather label, 140 pages, index. Price $1.25 net, delivered. TRADE MORALS: THEIR ORIGIN, GROWTH AND PROV- INCE. By Edward D. Page. 12mo, cloth binding, 276 pages, index. Price $1.50 net, delivered. Trade Morals THEIR ORIGIN. GROWTH AND PROVINCE BY EDWARD D. PAGE NEW HAVEN: YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON: HUMPHREY MILFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS MDCCCCXIV A KQ ^•'/> A.rs-0^3 Copyright, 1914 Bv Yale University Press First printed July, 1914, 1000 copies PREFACE This book is the outgrowth of a course of lectures delivered to the graduating class at the Sheffield Scientific School of Yale University in the spring of 191 1. Their object was to show in some consecutive form the growth of trade morals from the social and mental conditions which form the environment of business men, and to illustrate their meaning and purpose in such a way as to clarify if not to solve some difficulties by which the men of our time are perplexed. The lecturer took for granted a basis of knowledge such as is possessed by undergraduate students of the natural and social sciences, and the effort was made to carry minds so prepared one step further along toward the interpretation of some of the problems with which they would soon be com- pelled to cope. Nearly all of them were shortly to come into contact with business — to engage in it, in fact — and he felt that it was important that they should make this start with some definite notion of the values and problems involved in the business side of their vocational career. My object, as I explained to the class, in the impromptu introduction to the first lecture, was to paint with a broad brush, in bright colors and maybe with rough outlines, an impressionistic picture of the vi PREFACE interrelations of society, morals and mind in their effect upon the conduct of the business man. The artist who essays this object has never been over- concerned with such details as he considers unessen- tial to the production of his effect, and his materials he endeavors so to manage that they shall compose at a glance into a truthful portrayal of the whole scene or subject. In like spirit I have essayed to treat the ever vital question of human activity, its evolutionary progress and the co-ordinate develop- ment of morals — with especial reference and appli- cation to the business problems of our time. Originally composed in the intervals of pressing business demands and away from books of reference, the lectures took a somewhat didactic form, which I have not been at pains to alter. Their object was to instruct, and to lead average men to think, rather than to be the medium of original work along lines of scientific discovery. So far as they lean upon the sister sciences of biology, sociology and psychology I have tried in them to restate in a simple and concise form, but sometimes from different angles of vision, the results arrived at by competent investigators in these fields. If there is anything original in the point of view here taken, it must lie in such results as may be derived from a comprehensive rather than an intensive scrutiny of the conditions which underlie the entire fabric of business life. And business acts, to paraphrase Matthew Arnold's famous generaliza- tion of conduct, may make three fourths of civilized PREFACE vii life In our day and generation. Under modern con- ditions of exchange nearly everybody in society is engaged in business, and upon its results his welfare largely depends. Under the circumstances above outlined, It was impossible to supply the text with footnotes of acknowledgment to the various authorities upon whom I have so liberally drawn. And so I have been obliged to refer the reader to my sources In a more general way by annexing, at the end, a list of the works on which I have depended for my material. If In this presentation a partisan view anywhere has been adhered to, my conclusion may, of course, be questioned by those holding different tenets; In which case I shall hope either to be able to give a good account of, and support for, my contentions, or have the sense to make some alteration in my view- point. But I believe that the conclusions here pre- sented will well stand the test of experience, being founded, In the main, upon induction from observa- tion, and tinctured to no considerable degree with unwarranted Inferences from Imaginary situations. They do, however, summarize the results of a per- sonal experience and observation of the ethical rela- tions of men of business to the community extending over many years, of which I may hope sometime to make a more adequate presentation. I acknowledge with gratitude the kind suggestions of my friends; particularly those of Prof. Albert G. Keller of Yale, who revised the proofs of the viii PREFACE first five chapters; and of Dr. Stewart Paton of Princeton, whose criticism led to greater clarity in a part of the seventh. Edward D. Page. Oakland, N. J., November 3, 19 13. TO THE READER Two preliminary thoughts, if you please, before we commit ourselves, unrestrained, to the mazes of impulse and Intellection through which human con- duct Is determined, with the trust that at the end we shall have emerged successfully into a clearer light of understanding and decision. The first is this ; that it is necessary to remember always that the definite and distinct classes, grades, modes, levels, etc., of which we shall be obliged to Classifica- speak, while aiding the clear comprehension of series tion an of events or natural phenomena, do not In fact exist imperfect In the exact sense with which they are described; and process are not separated from each other by clear-cut boundaries or lines of demarcation. In all the sciences having to do with life, classes, genera, species and varieties are in outline more shadowy than distinct. There is a twilight zone or penumbra between neighboring varieties, in which one shades off more or less gradually Into the other, with more or less mingling of their features. We must not forget that the classification of the sciences Is An effort only an approximation made imperative by that of the finite imperfection of the human mind which demands to realize halting places from which to survey Its work. ^^^ infinite The natural state of all things is a state of motion. The rate may be very slow, as In the building up of geological strata, or very rapid, as in the case of what TO THE READER The artifice of classifi- cation Decline of formal religion men in their ignorance have called the "fixed" stars, but there is always motion except perhaps in death. Nature progresses by the gradual and insidious methods of evolution and never halts. But a human sense finds great difficulty in observing objects in motion. It cannot readily comprehend them ; and so, instantaneous photographs of the postures actually assumed by so familiar an object as a running horse seem unreal, unless taken at some stage of comparative rest that can be easily recog- nized by the eye. To overcome this difficulty, in the study of the sciences, men have devised classifications, that is to say, convenient but artificial stopping places, where the mind turns away, as it were, from the constant survey of motion and looks backward for a moment to inspect what has gone before. The divisions or categories by which it reviews the facts of observa- tion are only stages wherein certain characteristics have become more salient than in others ; and so lend their name, for the purpose of convenient recogni- tion, to a zone through which sequential changes are nevertheless constantly passing at greater or lesser rates of motion. The second thought is less difficult of statement. In the decline of formal religious influence which has marked the course of civilization during the last forty years there is a gap left where once there was a keen impulse to right living, and right living more than anything else is dependent upon right think- TO THE READER xi ing. In default of the rise of another great Moral Master, we must found our hope on an ethical pro- gress fashioned by and of the people itself. So that from a democratic consideration of conduct we may Democracy hope to see principles arise with whose assistance in morals we may make moral rules to fit the new modes of action into which we have been forced by the techni- cal and scientific advances of the times. If this progress is to be aided by the study of ethics its con- clusions must be expressed in words derived from the vernacular. Dissertations which only college professors can understand without effort, are of very little value in leading people generally to think about conduct. And so, the terms used must be those Value of the which English-speaking people may understand so vernacular natively that they will not shy at the effort of think- ing in them. Having experienced the ease of compre- hension which went with the reading of Professor Sumner's massive but undigested treatise on the folkways, I have ventured to follow his example, and to form such new terms as seemed necessary from words already current in English use. To do so is no easy task and I shamefully admit one or two lazy departures, which, in case it is ever necessary to reprint, I shall endeavor to correct. For the reader's convenience I have prefixed to these papers the definitions of all terms used in special or definite senses therein ; and now commend myself to his most charitable indulgence. DEFINITIONS Agent — the doer of an act of conduct or behavior. Antagonism — the general principle of mutually resisting forces which underlies all nature, whose expressions are discord, conflict, competition, individualism, radiation, centrifugence, etc. Anthropology — the system of knowledge relating to man. Behavior — involuntary action moulded to ends through natural forces acting according to natural law. Business — human activity in the exchange of services, com- modities or money. Character — the combination of qualities in any person aris- ing from his disposition, temperament and habits of conduct — an expression for the sum of the natureways and nurtureways of a person. Civilization — the aggregate expression of the life of a nation in its arts, sciences and modes of conduct. Clan — a folkgroup of families held together by the sentiment of descent from a common ancestor. Class-custom — ( see group-custom ) . Commerce — the exchange of commodities, between different peoples or folkgroups. Commodities — goods destined to be exchanged. Concurrence — the general principle of mutually co-operating forces which underlies all nature, and whose expressions are attraction, gravity, harmony, co-operation, combina- tion, socialism, centripetence, etc. Conduct — voluntary action adjusted to ends (Spencer). Custom — habitual conduct, common to a group, consciously recognized as conducive to welfare. DEFINITIONS xiii Disposition — the sum of all the instincts and acquired habits of using or controlling them of any person. Economics — the system of knowledge relating to conduct involved in the production of wealth. Ethics — the system of knowledge relating to moral conduct. Family — a group of two or more individuals of different sexes; essentially parents with their children; held together by the instinct of reproduction. Fear — a sentiment derived from the instinct of flight — a motive to conduct through (a) fear of the environment, men, outgroups, wild beasts, disease or (b) fear of the folkgroup, of ancestors or gods. Finance — (human activity in) the exchange of money or the written representatives of money value. Folk — (in combination) pertaining to the folkgroup. Folk-custom — a uniform mode of conscious folkgroup con- duct; derived from folkways recognized as conducive to groupal welfare ["one of the mores" (Sumner) ; "Sitte" (Wundt)]. Folkfaith — the religious belief of a folkgroup. Folk-feeling — social sentiment, public opinion of a folkgroup. Folkgroup — the largest number of human groups who at a given time and place feel that they are held together for the satisfaction of common interests ; — the prevailing social group. Folklaw — the common law; folk-custom methodized and declared by courts of law. Folkspeech — the language of a folkgroup. Folkways — a uniform mode of conduct practiced by men in group or mass conditions, under the stimulation of common interests; usage, social habit [Branch (Wundt)]. xiv DEFINITIONS Folkweal — the welfare of the folkgroup. Folkwill — the will of the folkgroup (Folkwille) . Group — any number of individuals thinking and acting together for a common purpose. Group-custom — a uniform mode of conduct, common to a group or class, and consciously recognized as conducive to its welfare. Habit — a uniform mode of acting established by a person in the effort better to adjust himself to his environment \_Gewohnheit (Wundt)]. Heterethnic — of other groups. Humanistics — uniform groupal modes of conduct arising from pity or compassion for individuals. Hunger — a feeling derived from tropisms, the stimulus of the alimentary instincts. Industry — human activity in the production of commodities. Instinct — a faculty motiving behavior in animals and man; reflexes co-ordinated by a central nervous ganglion or brain. Instinctive act — a uniform mode of behavior motived by instincts. Institution — an organized and formal artifice for the promo- tion of folk-custom or humanistics. Law — a rule of external human action, affirmed and enforced by the folkgroup. Love — the emotional expression of the reproductive instinct. Market — a group of buyers and sellers (Emery). Morals — the rules of right conduct recognized as valid at any given time by any group. Nation — a folkgroup of families or tribes held together by the necessity of peace. DEFINITIONS xv Natureways — modes of behavior ; uniform unconscious modes of action, produced by the natural environment. Nurtureways — modes of conduct; uniform conscious modes of human action produced by education under group conditions. Personality — the self-expression of a person as determined by his self-consciousness. Pity — sympathy for the sufferings of others, together with a desire to relieve them. Psychology — the system of knowledge relating to neuro- mental phenomena. Reflexes — uniform modes of behavior, the indirect effect of environment on the organism through nervous ganglia; tropisms co-ordinated by a spinal cord. Self-consciousness — the sum of knowledge, at a given time, possessed by a person of himself, his feelings and desires. Sociology — the system of knowledge relating to men or ani- mals living together in groups. Subject — one who is subjected to an act done by another. Temperament — mental expression as influenced by bodily organs and nervous system. Trade — the exchange of commodities between markets (Emery). Transportation — the conveyance of persons or commodities from one place to another. Tribe — a folkgroup of families or clans held together by the need for efficiency in war. Tropism — a mode of behavior which is the direct response of an organism to its environment. Vanity — the expression of the instinct of positive self-feeling. Volition — conscious choice between motives. Welfare — a state or condition, arising from the adjustment of an organism to its environment. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE Preface v To THE Reader ix Definitions xii I. The Evolution of Society 1 II. The Evolution of Nations .... 17 III. The Evolution of Conduct .... 33 IV. The Evolution of Morals 50 V. The Evolution of Humanistic Ideals . 72 VI. Moral Adjuncts — Institutions and Con- science 91 VII. The Evolution of the Will: Its Regu- lation of the Impulses 115 VIII. The Economic Impulses — Business . . 136 IX. Business Conditions of the Twentieth Century in the United States . . 160 X. Immigration — Quick Trading . . . 188 XI. Moral Conditions of Success . . . . 213 XII. Competition — Contract — Conclusions . 242 Sources 263 Index 273 TRADE MORALS I THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIETY On the granite block which forms the corner stone of one of the largest manufactories in New Eng- land — the first mill successfully established in this country to spin and weave flax into linen cloths — there is carved in strong letters these words : " All was others, All will be others." In this rude phrasing is expressed a thought that has dominated and guided the intellectual develop- ment of the last half century. With the issue in 1859 of Darwin's Origin of Species, began the conception. The now grown to a conclusion, that everything within Doctrine of our ken, instead of being at rest or in fixed or stable Evolution equilibrium, is really in a continual state of motion or change; that what today is, is the issue of some- thing that was yesterday and is the source of some- thing else that will be tomorrow — "All was others; All will be others." Darwin's great discovery answered the question: Are there causes in Nature for the differences which its we observe between the many varieties of living Biological animals and plants? With additions and subtrac- application tions it remains today the accepted doctrine account- TRADE MORALS Its extension to the Physical Sciences Evolution in Psychology ing for the development of all the different living species which exist upon the face of the Earth. Upon this doctrine is based the theory of the biological sciences, Botany, Zoology, Physiology, Geology and all their kindred branches of knowledge. More recently this doctrine of continual change and devel- opment has made its way into the physical sciences, Chemistry, Physics and Mineralogy, and we may now more than suspect that the metals themselves, once a type of stability and inertness, are like living beings subject to their own laws of orderly and sequential change. Modern study of the phenomena of radio-activity has led to the conclusion that like plants they have a period of growth, and possibly of decay — measured indeed by eons instead of by years. Before long the philosopher's stone may have become a reality. Firmly established as the interpretation of the observed sequence of facts with respect to the origin and growth of physiological structure and function, the theory of evolution is now extended to the explanation of the problems presented by the more newly observed assimilations between the mental processes of men and beasts. And so. Psychology is learning not only that the active instincts of man originate in the lower animals, but that intellectual ideas which have been classed as self-evident — axioms which Euclid or Plato used as the starting point of their logical arguments — are by no means intuitively inherent in the natural constitution of the THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIETY 3 human mind. Rather do we now regard those fundamental notions in mathematical and logical sciences which we call axioms, aphorisms, maxims, precepts or proverbs, and with which people start their reasoning as postulates or self-evident truths, as growing out of the observation and inference of many generations over an immense period of time. It follows that two and two make four, that things equal to the same thing are equal to each other, that the whole is greater than its part, are proposi- tions universally accepted without argument, not because of any inherent incapacity of the mind to question them, but because centuries of observation have proven them to be statements of fact, whereby an unconscious and universal habit has been formed of regarding them as self-evident and necessary truths. If, then, the facts, of which we have taken a brief survey, advancing from the more elementary of inert matter to the more complex of the human body and brain, may all be generalized as nothing else than particular phases of the universal phenomena of change and growth, how is it when we come in con- tact with the yet more complex aspects of mankind Evolution in combination — the moral, economic and political in relations which they assume to each other in society? Sociology Are there the same problems of change and growth to be solved in the sphere of the mutual relations of man to man? And does the theory of evolution play the same part in the solution of these social TRADE MORALS problems as it does In the other less complex fields of inquiry? For it is plain that the relations of man to man in social life depend upon the conduct of each man toward the other, considered first as individuals, and then as bound together by some tie of associa- tion, as in a state, or as in a common employment, and that this conduct, being both intangible and diffuse, is a matter of much greater complexity than any of those previously considered. Intangible because unrecorded, except as to the infinitesimal fraction which is of contemporary interest; diffuse, because so widespread that it is beyond the power of any observer to perceive more than another small fraction of the whole. Conduct Conduct, "voluntary action adjusted to ends,"^ follows apparently the caprices of the human will, and at first blush would seem to be a subject incap- able of appraisal and classification by the scientific methods which have classified the more fixed and settled phenomena of nature, recognized their inter- relations and established the laws of their uniform Its laws sequence in action. Nevertheless, through the found by method of segregation or abstraction, that is to say, abstraction by considering a certain class of conduct by itself, men have made some progress in formulating the uniform correspondence and sequence of conduct, and have reached some definite scientific conceptions of common modes of human action shown in rea- soning, as in Logic or Mathematics; in the accu- 1 Herbert Spencer, Data of Ethics, p. 2. THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIETY 5 mulation of wealth, as in Economics ; in talking, as in Linguistics; and in the ways in which human beings live together, as in Sociology. Each of these sciences has succeeded in some degree in its quest for laws or universal ways by which men act when reasoning, when earning, when speaking or when associating in a society. Society, in the general sense in which I have here What is used it, is not the little fellowship of congenial people Society? in a neighborhood who take themselves seriously as the self-appointed guardians of etiquette or courte- sies, to appraise exactly the value of various styles of dress, or the strict obligations of mutual enter- tainment. On the contrary, what I refer to is the largest body of persons who feel that they are held together for the satisfaction of common interests. A common political organization is not of necessity the tie ; for three quarters of a century prior to the Civil War two distinct societies were united in the Federal Union, yet with such diverse interests as to eventually rend them asunder. Except by force, Ulster and Kerry can hardly be held together on their common island with their common speech and with their common king. Nor should we say that Austria and Hungary, though joined by a common rule, and contributors to a common war chest, are anything but two distinct societies. Common language is not the tie; quite different in social customs and aspirations are Canada and New Zealand. 1 he bond that unites men into a society is TRADE MORALS Ethics the science of right and wrong conduct Not all conduct is moral or immoral one of common thought and feeling, and centuries of political separation as with the Poles in Austria, Germany and Russia, or with the Greeks in Crete and the Archipelago, are powerless to destroy it. Ethics is the science by which we endeavor to dis- cover principles governing human conduct when appraised as either right or wrong. Its method is similar to that of its sister science of Political Economy, which has to do with the principles guiding human conduct toward gainful or wasteful ends. In the one, conduct having moral effect, purport or implication is segregated for the time being from all other conduct for study and classification; just as in the other, conduct having a bearing on the acquisi- tion of wealth is segregated for the same purpose. Not all conduct must of necessity be moral or immoral; often it has no moral significance whatso- ever and is therefore simply unmoral. We should not think of attaching moral consequences to ordi- nary eating or drinking, the wearing of a coat or the drawing of a check for money. And yet we must admit that under circumstances gluttony or excessive drinking of stimulants may be immoral because of its consequences to our families or business associates; we should quickly find ourselves in jail were we to venture on the street naked, and were we to draw a check on a bank in which we had no account we would subject ourselves to the charge of fraud, and to criminal prosecution. The essential difference between the acts to which we are in the habit of THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIETY 7 attributing moral significance and those which have no implication of right and wrong lies in the fact that the former are good or bad for others than our- selves, that is to say, they affect either the feelings or welfare of our families, or of our neighbors, or maybe of the whole society in which the acts are performed and of which the actor is a part. If we could consider man as an isolated individual In isolation we can understand why it is necessarily impossible no morals for him under such circumstances to pursue an immoral course of conduct; for in his case there is no other person to be injured or benefited by his conduct. So long as Robinson Crusoe remained alone on the island of Juan Fernandez his acts con- cerned no one but himself and hence were neither wrong nor right. They might only be wise or foolish so far as they were correctly or imperfectly adjusted to his own survival in the environment by which he was surrounded. But from the moment that he found in the sand the footprints of the man Friday some part of his conduct was adjusted with reference to this other person and thus was in the way of being compared with some standard, to agree with which would be right, or to differ with would be wrong. Conduct may have a variety of qualities; it may be wise or imprudent, thrifty or wasteful, sensible or foolish, healthy or morbid ; and yet neither right nor wrong. Or it may be several of these and also right or wrong. Like a bargain or a quarrel, it takes two to make TRADE MORALS Moral conduct a social matter Sociology Social traces in fossil life moral conduct. It therefore follows that the science which deals with right and wrong conduct is essen- tially one of the sciences of society. It assumes and is dependent upon that aggregation of men and women, leading a common existence, and depending to a greater or less degree upon each other for the amenities of life, which we are in the habit of calling a community, people or society. Society being the fabric upon which is traced the embroidery of moral conduct, it will be necessary briefly to inquire into Its raw material and texture as shown by the researches of the biological and anthro- pological sciences. Looking backward by the aid of these departments of knowledge to the earliest known manifestations of the existence of man, we can find no conditions under which even the most primitive of mankind are devoid of some form of association. Paleontology even teaches us through fossils preserved in early geological strata that the roots of social life are to be found in the most primeval animal history. In the Paleozoic Age the compound nature of many poly- zoan fossils points clearly to the existence of societies in lower forms of life, whose individual members were dependent upon each other and upon the entire group or colony for food, propagation and protec- tion from the enemies that might otherwise have destroyed them. What little we know of the habits of living animals confirms the same general principle of a rudimentary THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIETY 9 social or collective activity which permeates and Social traits pervades almost the entire range of animal existence, of the lower Many Polyzoa, like corals and sponges, cannot exist animals independently of others of their kind. Insects, like ants and bees, dwell together in orderly swarms. Fishes are found together in schools or shoals. Of the Birds consort in broods, coveys and flocks. Among higher the higher mammals, flocks, herds and droves of animals wild sheep, deer and cattle show a like social organi- zation ; a tendency which seems to weaken only in the case of a few carnivora and birds of prey, and even with these there is never less than a pair. What are the causes that underlie this tendency to Causes of animal association? In the lower forms, scantily animal provided with motive capacity, it would seem to society arise from a need of greater self-protection than an individual can furnish — a co-operation, so to speak, in building a barrier, such as a shell, against the assaults of more alert and food-seeking enemies ; and this structure by reason of its weight assists in the capture of sea-borne food which floats more rapidly in the current than do the heavy protective tissues which the colony secretes. It is quite appar- ent that an individual escaping from such a colony would have a comparatively slight chance of survival wherever foes were plentiful and food scarce. In the higher animals a flock or herd will better escape beasts of prey by the warning or even by the sacrifice of one of its outlying sentinels; and the group sur- vives where stragglers perish. A group, too, gives 10 TRADE MORALS Causes of human society Hunger Love Vanity Fear greater opportunities for sexual commerce and for the protection of the young, so that it can reproduce a larger number of its kind, in whom a habit of asso- ciation, become instinctive, will strengthen with each successive generation. Society, as Sumner points out in his Folkways, is the result of an effort to satisfy interests growing out of four motive forces common to all mankind, tersely stated as Hunger, Love, Vanity and Fear.^ These may be called the primitive motives, because even across the vague boundaries which part humankind from animalkind we find them efficient causes of social formation, in which the brutes participate as well as our goodselves. Hunger, the need of sus- tenance; love, the need of reproduction; are blotic motives common in some form to all life, be it vegetal or animal. But only beings possessing a centralized ganglionic nervous organization are sus- ceptible to the motives of fear and vanity, important, as we shall see, to survival in the more complex environment of all higher types of organisms. No being without some form of mental devel- opment can experience them, and therefore they may be called psychic motives. For centuries they have been recognized in literature and language as per- 2 It is quite possible that this, as a classification of motives, is by no means exhaustive, for all of the instincts seem to be more or less involved in the production of folkways. On the other hand it is the essential part of a fundamentally true picture, and by its vividness will be the more easily recalled to the student's mind. THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIETY 11 taining to the brutes as well as to ourselves. Has not the peacock always been the symbol of vanity, and "chicken-hearted" or "pigeon-hearted" a type of timidity when applied to man?' After the recognition of the germ of society Sub-human throughout the animate life of the ages, however origin of remote, it is easy to surmise that in the most primi- Society tive form of human living some kind of social structure will be found. And so, as a matter of fact, except as a sport, or abnormal exception, the isolated individual man does not exist ; and incapable of self- propagation, his type cannot survive. Go back as far as we can in anthropological research we can find no time nor place in which mankind was not organ- ized in groups. It seems reasonable that the funda- mental group is the family, consisting of parents and their children during their period of helplessness.* To borrow an illustration from chemistry, the family The may be looked upon as the sociological atom, the Family a hypothetically indivisible group recognized by the sociological science of mankind. ^*''™ But this family group, the social atom, is itself 3 It is true that Sumner attempts to restrict his definition of fear to that inspired by ghosts and spirits — too narrow, I believe, for that fear of consequences inspired by a living enemy or by social punishment, of which animal instinct as well as human intelligence affords so many illustrations. * Mindful of the fact that the family is not necessarily monog- amous nor even monandrous, and that pre-marital promiscuity is known to exist along with a subsequent fixed ideal of marital fidel- ity, I think there is ground to agree with Westermarck's conclusion as to the non-survival of the horde or herd group in human society. 12 TRADE MORALS only exceptionally capable of independent or isolated existence ; and like the physical or chemical atom can effectively persist only in combination with other similar atoms, forming a larger social group, just as groups of atoms form the larger chemical molecule. The earliest form of a larger social group of which we have positive knowledge is composed of two or more related families, and may be thought of as the sociological molecule, the smallest portion that is capable of prolonged or permanent separate exist- ence. In the formation of such social groups anthropology shows that everywhere and always a common line of evolution has been followed; that The Clan the clan, or kinship group, composed of a number or Kinship of families and founded upon some fact or theory of Group blood relationship, is the original form of molecule into which all primitive races have first compounded themselves for political or social purposes. Uni- versally, therefore, the original coherent force that held together a combination of similar family atoms A in the larger molecule of the clan was the sentiment sociological of descent from a common ancestor, molecule An interesting expression of this sentiment is found in the words which are used in the languages of nations far beyond the stage where the former existence of clan groups is even remembered. And so each citizen of Rome called his country Patria — fatherland — long after the feeling of descent from a common ancestor which had held together the clan of Romulus and Remus on the seven hills had passed THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIETY 13 from the realm of fact to that of fancy. To this day a relic of common descent can be seen In the Scottish clan surnames, whose prefix Mac is the Gaelic word for son. There are numerous instances where words indicative of common ancestry have survived the extinction of the clan through its absorp- tion into a greater group. And pioneer colonists, settled in isolation under primitive conditions, often revert in their group structure to clan formations — a process not uncommon in the mountains of our Middle South. In its general formation a primitive clan group follows out with great similarity the group method of anthozoans and other polyzoans. Each human family, like each sponge or coral insect, is similarly constituted, and in either case the molecule is com- posed of aggregations of equal or similar atoms, be they families or insects. Human families under these conditions are no more self-sufficing and inde- pendent than those of their insect analogues, and when several families are brought together into one Clan community, they find it easier to protect themselves conditions against the aggressions of men or of wild beasts; to satisfy mate without incest or inbreeding, and to co-operate '^^^'^ in the pursuit of game, in the management of flocks ^°^^ or in averaging the risks of tillage. Combined ^, . r 1