itttfilliirifithtihit-l-'; [T'^'V^r ?R a 31 CORNiiLL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ; "« S3l.jii'''->'0ni.ersnyu,r> ary A book The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924013278282 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS SYDNEY SMITH FROM THE PAINTING BY HENRY P. BRIGGS IN THE NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS BY WALTER JERROLD WITH TWELVE ILLUSTRATIONS NEW YORK McBRIDE, NAST & COMPANY 1912 .^ ' 'r, '^'M. ( I.. X PREFACE MAN has been variously defined as an animal who wears clothes, an animal who cooks, an animal who smokes, and so on ; he might be described also as an anecdote-loving animal. Everybody tells stories or listens to them, and in this I do not mean stories which have grown into psychological treatises under the name of novels, but brief anecdotes of real or imaginary people in imusual circumstances. The circimistance may be ridiculous, as of a portly and pompous person sitting down " hard and sudden " on a muddy pavement — from which we get the elementary or basic humour of incongruity — or it may pass through varying grades to the refinements of wit which are purely intellectuaJ — where the suggested ideas are seemingly incongruous untD brought into sudden juxtaposition. From enjoying the amusement of the incongruity as spectator or original hearer, it is but a step to enjoying it as history, and in that lies no doubt the reason for the existence of a very considerable library of anecdotal literature. Amusement is as necessary to a healthy mind as salt is to a healthy body, and that amusement attends us less naturally the further we remove from savagery and child- hood is one of the penalties we pay for civilization and for growing up. Therefore the demand for it is great, and vi A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS that feast of reason is best remembered which is savoured with the salt of amusement ; " the best after-dinner speaker of the day " is always a man who can amuse, who can bring to the subject on which he is speaking fresh anecdotes — ^however inapposite they may chance to be. "Good stories" are, indeed, more necessary to after-dinner talk than any single item in the menu of the meal. It is not pretended that the present volume is a collec- tion of new witticisms — Sheridan, Sydney Smith, Curran and others may be regarded as classics in the realm of ana, and to omit them would be as inexcusable as seek- ing to give novelty to an edition of Hamlet by leaving out all of the " familiar quotations " in the play. What is here offered is a survey of the development of wit as a pro- duct of modern social conditions — a presentation of the whole in an approximately chronological order, but only approximately chronological, because it seems well to classify to a certain extent the wits associated with special professions. Such an arrangement, it is hoped, may in part lessen that scrappiness which pertains to a mere higgledy-piggledy collection of ana. Another matter that may be mentioned is that it has been sought to limit this collection to witticisms associated with individual wits — that multiple personahty which has been described as Benjamin Trovato, Esquire, being kept as much as possible out of the company. To earlier collectors, from " Joe Miller " to Mark Lemon, to Captain Cuttles innumerable, and to the biographers and writers of obituary notices of many men who have been witty themselves, or the cause that PREFACE Vll wit was in other men, I am greatly indebted, and have sought, in the case of recent wits, to particularize any special source of indebtedness in the text. Twenty years ago, when I edited a set of little books known as the Bon-Mot Series, I was taken to task by some critics for using the plural bon-mots instead of following the French original. The error, if error it be, is repeated in this book; my contention being that the word is anglicized as bon-mots, — ^its use in that form by Horace Walpole, Smollett and Cowper overriding any objection that it has not duly taken out letters of naturalization under the authority of the dictionary makers. Should any future lexicographer care for the references, here they are. Wal- pole, writing to a friend on 5th AprU 1765, said : " Though I have little to say, it is worth while to write, only to tell you two bon-mots of Quin, to that turncoat, hypocrite infidel. Bishop Warburton." Smollett in one of the early letters of " Humphrey Clinker " says (also of Quin, by the way) : " His bon-mots are in every witling's mouth." Cowper, in " Truth " (11. 307-308) has : "The Scripture was his jest-book, whence he drew Bon mots to gall the Christian and the Jew." W.J. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. Of Wit and Humour generally ... i II. The Spacious Days i6 III. The Restoration 34 IV. The Augustan Period 45 V. Joe Miller ....... 58 VI. A Walk down Fleet Street ... 70 VII. Wit and Humour of the Theatres . . 85 VIII. QuiN, Foote, Bannister, Colman . . . 100 IX. Wit in Politics 120 X. Sheridan 140 XI. Wits in Society 163 XII. A Social Miscellany i8o XIII. Wits on the Press and in Literature . 198 XIV. Theodore Hook 215 XV. Wit in the Pulpit 232 XVI. Sydney Smith 252 XVII. Wit in Wigs 270 XVIII. Curran 286 XIX. Some Recent Wits: 1 303 XX. Some Recent Wits: II 3^7 Index 323 ix LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Sydney Smith Frontispiece From the Painting by Henry P. Briggs in the National Portrait Gallery FACING PAGE Ben Jonson 28 From the Painting by Gerard Honthorst in the National Portrait Gallery Jonathan Swift 50 From the Bust in St Patrick's Cathedral, Dublin Joe Miller (in the character of Teague in The Committee) ........ 60 From an Engraving by A. Miller after the Painting by C. Stofpelaer Samuel Foote 108 From an Engraving by T. Blackmere after the Painting by Sir Joshua Reynolds Richard Brinsley Sheridan 140 From the Painting by J. Russell, R.A., in the National Portrait Gallery George Selwyn 164 From a Portrait by Sir Joshua Reynolds, in the possession of the Earl of Rosebery Samuel Rogers 194 From the Painting by Thomas Phillips in the National Gallery Charles Lamb 200 From the Drawing by Robert Hancock in the National Portrait Gallery X LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS xi FACING PAGE Theodore Hook 224 From an Engraving John Philpot Curran 286 From the Painting by Sir Thomas Lawrence in the National Gallery of Ireland, Dublin Sir William Schwenck Gilbert 308 By permission of George Newnes Ltd. (Photo by Elliott &■ Fry) " Under the spreading chestnut tree " Longfellow A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS CHAPTER I OF WIT AND HUMOUR GENERALLY " As in smooth oil the razor best is whet So wit is by politeness sharpest set ; Their want of edge from their offence is seen Both pain us least when exquisitely keen." I MANY wits have been exercised in the effort to hght upon satisfactory definitions of the words so often twinned as wit and humour. Epigrammatists have sought to illustrate wit by exhibiting it in couplets or quatrains — more elaborate searchers after exactitude have even essayed treatises on the subject. Perhaps old Isaac Barrow got as near it, in a vague sentence in one of his sermons on Evil Speaking, as have any of those who have tried to pen the significance within the enclosure of a brief definition ; he says of wit, and the words may be applied as well to humour, " often it consisteth in one knows not what, and springeth up one can hardly tell how." This vague description is perhaps especially applicable to those manifestations of wit and humour with which we are here concerned, and though I do not propose to seek any new collocation of words pretending to define the exact significance of the two words, wit and humour, I may point 2 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS out the particular kinds of wit and humour examples of which it is proposed to bring together here. Our literature is particularly rich in both these qualities, from the days when Chaucer's kindly humour was finding expression in " The Canterbury Tales " to the present, when the wit of Mr Bernard Shaw has become something of a new genre. With such I am not concerned. The " sampling " even of the wit and humour of our litera,ture would need more than a single volume for its exhibition. Here I am concerned with wit and humour, not as invented or recorded in the author's study, but as expressed in society; not as it grows in secret like a flower the blooming of which all admire, but as it is flashed forth like sparks from flint, and steel in social interplay. It is, in a word, with the things said rather than with the things written that I am con- cerned ; with " the oil and wine of a merry meeting," as Washington Irving put it, rather than with the more solid sustenance afforded by formal Uterature. II It is inevitable that the writer of a book such as this should lay himself open to the charge of producing a work that is not suitable for straightforward reading, to the objection that wit delights by its infrequency, that a con- stant succession of happy sayings and neat retorts defeat their own ends, that as it is possible to have too much of a good thing, so it is possible to have too many good things. Well, it may be answered that though some books are made for the reader to devour straight away, others are for the entertainment of odd moments. Jests and witticisms are, as it were, but the hors-d' ceuvres at the feast of literature — and whoso will can pass them, and wait for the more solid OF WIT AND HUMOUR GENERALLY 3 faxe in which some of them may haply reappear as flavour- ing. It is not necessary to seek far in our Uterary history to find that for centuries each successive generation has had its collections of jests and " good stories," and the constant supply, it may be supposed, indicates a certain constancy of demand. From "AC. Mery Talys ' ' of nearly four hundred years ago there have been innumerable collections of face- tiae. Within a centiury of that publication came such others as " Mery Tales, Wittie Questions and Quick An- swers " ; " Merie Tales of Skelton " ; " Jests of Scogin " ; " Sackful of News " ; " Tarleton's Jests " ; " Merrie Con- ceited Jests of George Peele " ; to name but a few. Many of these were rather collections of anecdotes than witticisms, mere stories of quaint happenings, the humour of mishaps and horseplay, and were often just compilations of current tales to which was attached the name of a man popular at the moment. Later came " Foundling Hospitals," " Repositories," and other collections innumer- able, now in tiny chap-book form and now in series of volumes, until the rise of the comic press diminished but did not stop the demand for collections of jests old and new. The history of such collections provides matter for a treatise rather than a paragraph, and the subject is only referred to by way of explanation of the undertaking of a new work of this character in a somewhat novel form. in When Shakespeare wrote that a jest's prosperity lies in the ears of those who hear it he indicated that wit needs society for its production, and many other writers have in varied fashion accentuated the same truth. Samuel Johnson, for example, in true Johnsonian style, said " wit 4 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS like every other power has its boundaries. Its success depends on the aptitude of others to receive impressions ; and that as some bodies, indissoluble by heat, can set the furnace and crucible at defiance there are minds upon which the rays of fancy may be pointed without effect, and which no fire of sentiment can agitate or exalt." Which is a very lexicographical way of bombasting Shakespeare's short sentence out into a long one. Bacon says that " reading maketh a full man ; conference a ready man," and in proof of his statement we find that by its very nature wit can only occur in company. One may make a witty remark, but all have contributed to its birth.' It is essential that there shall be those who, like FalstaffTare the cause that wit is in other men. It is not possible to think of a solitary wit dwelling in the didactic poet's " lodge in some vast wilder- ness " and uttering his witticisms for his own delectation. The seed may be there, but it needs the warmth of society to bring it forth. John Taylor the Water Poet has a tale which illustrates the way in which wit is essentially the product of gregar- iousness : " Two learned good fellows were drinking a pipe of tobacco. It being almost out, so that he that drunk last did partly feel the ashes come hot to his lips, giving the pipe to his friend said — ' Ashes to ashes.' The other, taking the pipe and being of a quick apprehension, threw it out to the dunghill saying, ' Earth to earth.' " Thus wit with wit agrees hke cake and cheese. Both sides are gainers, neither side doth leese ; Conceit begets conceit — ^jest jest doth father. And butter fall'n to the ground doth something gather."- In this we are shown wit as the product in an interplay of wit ; but causes for wit, as Falstaff recognized, are needed, and also an audience, as Steele suggested when he described OF WIT AND HUMOUR GENERALLY 5 " honest old Dick Reptile . . . a good-natured indolent man, who speaks little himself but laughs at our jokes." Appre- ciation of the thing said is necessary to the production of its successors, and thus it is that in social gatherings — at the old coffee-houses and taverns, in club coteries, across the dinner-table, and wherever people were brought to- gether in small but congenial companies, were uttered the sayings which have taken their places in the successive compilations of good things flashed forth by men of ready wit. Such good things as Mr W. Carew Hazlitt has neatly said " are to be taken not as indices to the habitual un- broken mood of the man, but rather as samples of felicity of phrase or thought to be gotten, like mineral ore, under auspicious conditions from a wealthy soil." Those auspicious conditions, where the ore is wit, are provided by company, whether it be only that of two, that of five persons, which is said by Steele to form the " best company," or that of a crowd. Frequent illustration of this fact will be found through- out these pages, so many witticisms and jests being trace- able to such gatherings as have been indicated. Not only is society necessary to the production of wit, but it is also necessary to its remembrance, and even so, how many good things must have been uttered, perhaps repeated for a time, and then fallen into oblivion from no one having troubled to record them ? It is true that many acknowledged wits have had fathered on them sayings of others, but it is probable that, of the happy sayings of such men as Curran, Sydney Smith, Foote, Lamb and others, far more passed almost at once into the limbo of the forgotten than have been recorded, so that if carelessness has credited them with some things they did not say it has robbed them of many more that they did. A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS IV In his interesting little volume of " Studies in Jocular Literature " Mr W. Carew Hazlitt has recorded that the manor of Walworth was given by an Anglo-Saxon king to his jester, and that St Bartholomew's Hospital was founded by Rahere, joculator to a later monarch. Much has been written about the old jesters or fools who were retained at kings' and noblemen's courts to enliven their masters with quips and cranks. In all countries such functionaries were to be found — even it is said at the court of Montezuma — and they continued up to the seventeenth century in England, though it may be that the position of the jester diminished in importance as the use of the printing press increased. The place of the court jester, it has been said, was an assured one, as it was from him alone the truth could be heard without fear. He was licensed to give utterance to the unpalatable, and while entertaining his master could remind him of the fact of his mere man- hood in a way impossible to the ordinary run of courtiers. The truths that he was licensed to utter in the form of jesting may be regarded as reminders to the monarch of the fact that he was only a man, even as grim remnants of humanity were utilized to remind feasters of their mortality. Maybe the tragedy of 30th January 1649 did away with the necessity of kings retaining jesters for this purpose. The growth of the printing press had perhaps more to do with it. Anyway the decline and disappearance of jesters as recognized officials in society synchronized more or less closely with the gathering into books of such stories as they may well have told and such witty retorts as they were expected to make. What the jester was to the monarch and powerful noble of the Middle Ages, the comic OF WIT AND HUMOUR GENERALLY 7 and satiric press may be said to have become for the people in the nineteenth century. The wit of the past was uttered from beneath a fool's cap, and when that headgear went out of fashion for professional humorists it was on paper of the same name that they wrote down their fun or satire. The thing said that might tickle the ears of the court circle became the thing printed to be appreciated by all who could read. Definitions, it has been said, are dangerous, for the definer has at once set the limitations in which he may employ the term defined. Definitions of the words wit and humour, as it has been noted, are difi&cult, but a few words may be said as to the comprehensiveness with which they are here employed. A dictionary definition tells us that wit (in its seventh significance) is : " The faculty of associating ideas ki a new and ingenious, and at the same time pleasing way, exhibited in apt language and felicitous combination of words and thoughts, by which unexpected resemblances between things apparently unlike are vividly set before the mind, so as to produce a shock of pleasant surprise ; face- tiousness." Facetiousness is surely more allied to humour than to wit, and it is not necessary that the shock of surprise should be pleasant for the wit of a thing to be recognized. When a duU man had been stung to a sharp retort only to receive the crushing rejoinder : " You're like lead, sir : only bright when you're cut," he might well have recognized the wit but perceived nothing pleasant about it. It is to wit itself that we must turn for its own definition. The great Lord Chatham had asked Dr Henneker to define the word, and received the happy reply : " Wit is what a pension would be if given 8 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS by your lordship to your humble servant — a good thing well applied." The same dictionary in defining our particular aspect of humour contrasts it not very satisfactorily with its twin, describing it as " a mental faculty which tends to discover incongruous resemblances between things which essentially differ, or essential differences between things put forth as the same ; the result being internal mirth or an outburst of laughter. Wit does so likewise, but the two are different. Himiour has deep human sympathy, and loves men while raising a laugh against their weaknesses. Wit is deficient in S3mipathy, and there is often a sting in its ridicule. Somewhat contemptuous of mankind, it has not the patience to study them thoroughly, but must content it- self with noting superficial resemblances or differences. Humour is patient and keenly observant, and penetrates beneath the surface ; whilst, therefore, the sallies of wit are often one-sided and unfair, those of humour are, as a rule, just and wise." Here we have at any rate an approxi- mation to a definition, but nothing more, for if it were exact — if for example wit were always somewhat con- temptuous of mankind, and humour always possessed of deep human sympathy — the two qualities could scarcely be found, as so often they are, in the same individual. There is the difference that humour is more often merely plajrful, while wit is frequently weighted with intent either to wound or convey a reproach, or snub, or criticism- Two dinner-table anecdotes from an old collection will illustrate the difference. At a dinner of artists and literary men it is said that a poet proposed the toast of " The painters and glaziers of Great Britain ! " coupling with it the name of a famous artist. The toast having been duly honoured, the artist returned thanks, and neatly retaliated on the poet by coupling his name with a further toast " The British OF WIT AND HUMOUR GENERALLY 9 paper stainers ! " This was the give-and-take of hiunour. The second story is of an affected young man who was dining with a Yorkshire family and when the hostess ordered the servant to remove " the fool," meaning the fowl, corrected her saying : " I presume you mean the fowl, madam." " Very well," responded the annoyed York- shirewoman, " take away the fowl, and let the fool remain." This may have been blunt, but it was wit. It was humour again when Lord Chesterfield said of two people dancing a minuet " they looked as if they were hired to do it — and were doubtful of being paid." It was wit when the same nobleman, on being told that a noted gamester had married a notorious termagant, remarked that cards and brimstone made the best matches. The pun of that closing word suggests that a few words should be said on a manifestation of wit and humour which is widely decried — chiefly it may be believed by those who have not the faculty of instantly perceiving similarities in things seemingly remote. People who condemn pun- ning ofQiand do so with insufficient consideration. There are the old pantomime puns — ^responsible probably for bringing the whole family into contempt — which were nothing but wresting and twisting words to give them a mere similarity of sound. I recall a couple of instances from a pantomime of about thirty years ago ; the subject of which was presumably Robinson Crusoe : " This, then, is ail my knack you see, An almanack I've here " ; and " The lack of sheets I hardly count a pain." Such word-tortviring is of course indefensible ; it has neither wit nor humour, though its very far-fetchedness has in it something of the ludicrous. The true pun needs 10 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS defence no more than any other work of art ; it is its own justification. It is of course not the product of word twisting : it consists in the ready appreciation of the diverse significances of words, and may often be the feather of the arrow on which is carried the point of wit. Here is an instance. Henry Erskine was engaged in a case concerning a breach of warranty. A horse had been taken on trial and had become dead lame, and in his evidence a witness said that the animal had a cataract in the eye. " A singular proof of lameness," remarked the opposition counsel sarcastically. " It is cause and effect," instantly retorted Erskine, " for what is a cataract but a fall ? " It is to Erskine, by the way, that we owe the happiest defence of the pun — a defence that would win the verdict of any intelligent jury. A friend had declared that punning was the lowest form of wit ; " it is," answered the lawyer, in ready agreement, " and therefore the foundation of all wit." Many years ago I perpetrated — with apologies to the shade of Wordsworth — the following defence of the pun for a small circle of anti-punsters, the adaptation of a fine sonnet was perhaps indefensible, but it may be claimed that the lines at least show that those who unthinkingly condemn a pun merely because it is a pun oppose them- selves to a formidable company : — " Scorn not the pun ; non-punster, you have frowned. Mindless of its just honours ; with this key Shakespeare turned many locks ; the pleasantry Of this small jest gives ease to many a wound ; A thousand times this pipe did Hood resound ; With it did Cicero soothe an exile's grief ; The Pun has glittered, a gay myrtle leaf. Amid the bays with which Eliza crowned Her spacious days ; a glow-worm lamp. It cheered mild Goldsmith, called from Ireland OF WIT AND HUMOUR GENERALLY ii To struggle through dark ways ; and when a damp Fell round the path of Eha, in his hand The Pun became a pipe from which he blew Laugh-animating strains — alas, too few ! " In the prefatory jingle of verses to an old collection of jests it is declared that " Punning has been in every clime Recorded in the rolls of time,'' which may be regarded as somewhat of an exaggeration. It may, however, be pointed out that at the present time, when the pun is most severely reprehended by those in- capable of apprehending it, in its worst form it seems to flourish in the field of advertisement. I imagine the typical anti-punster as walking about with a " Wauken- phast " boot on one foot, a " Phiteesi " on the other, smoking a " Uneeda " cigar, and peering about through " Eusebius " spectacles for anything like a pun at which he can sneer. In a recent newspaper article Mr G. K. Chesterton has neatly indicated the way in which a pun may present that which could only otherwise be expressed in a roundabout fashion, " may briefly embody the chief essence of art, that completeness of form should confirm completeness of idea." Among his illustrations he gives the following : — " When we come to the great puns of Hood or of any other writer, we note first of all this use of the pun in sharpening and clinching a thought. Suppose that Hood, writing a journalistic report of one of the last duels, had written : ' Both principals fired in the air ; and we cannot too strongly express our hope that those who think it incumbent on them to use this old form of self- vindication may imitate such a sensible and humane interpretation of it.' That is sound enough ; but it 12 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS is a little laborious, and does not express either the detachment or the decision of such a critic of duelling. Hood, as a fact, did write : " ' So each one upwards in the air His shot he did expend. And may all other duels have That upshot at the end.' " Here the verbal jest, falling so ridiculously right, does express not merely the humanity of the critic, but also his humorous impartiality and unruffled readiness of intellect." VI In concluding this discursive prefatory chapter a few words must be said on a subject that cannot fail to strike anyone who seeks to trace a bon mot to its original utter- ance by the wit with whose name it has become associated. Such tracing is in the majority of cases impossible. Most wits, it may well be believed, would give but a bad time to those who sought to boswellize them. Sententiousness may have its Boswell, and keep him fairly well occupied, but wit is a less reliable companion, ^nd the Boswell who sought ever to be at its elbow, note-book in hand, would either hear things about himself which even a Boswell would prefer to leave unrecorded or else would reduce wit to silence. Only in such unthinkable conditions could we have a reliable record of the good things uttered by the ready-witted man. As it is, we have to rely partly on contemporary evidence, and partly on tradition — and neither of these authorities is in the present connexion to be accepted unquestioningly. Only recently, when Sir William Schwenck Gilbert died, and his well-deserved reputation as master of a ready tongue made it necessary OF WIT AND HUMOUR GENERALLY 13 that the papers should give instances of his wit, I saw a saying attributed to him which had already been fathered on several other men. If contemporary evidence can be thus unreliable, how much less can we depend upon the certain accuracy of tradition ? An old story is, indeed, often repeated and attached to the name of a recent wit as though to impart to it a freshness of atmosphere, so that the collection of witticisms can scarcely be regarded as one of the exact sciences. At times, it is true, the mots are recorded at once in letters and diaries, and so can be credited to their rightful owners with some confidence, but more often they have been repeated again and again, until by the time that they get written down they have become attributed to the wrong parentage. We all know the parlour game of whispering a sentence from one person on to another round a large circle until it comes back, often wonderfully transmogrified, to the original speaker. In that game we get an illustration of the growth of scandal — and a damning indictment of oral tradition. It is, then, only approximately possible to father conversational wit and humour rightly ; the matter being further complicated owing to the not uncommon propensity of one who has thought of a good thing that might be said repeating it or recording it as a thing actually uttered by some acknow- ledged wit of the moment. To those who have shall be given. There must be many small holders in the realm of wit, but many of these owners cheerfully make over their titles to established magnates. Thus it is that we have far fewer " single joke HamUtons " than might reasonably be expected. This is not to suggest that the reputations of Sheridan, Lamb, Sydney Smith, Curran, Douglas Jerrold, W. S. Gilbert and others have been undijJy swelled by accretions — for probably not a tithe of the good things which made their reputations were ever 14 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS put on paper ; innumerable sayings of theirs must have made their hearers laugh (perhaps their victims squirm) and then been forgotten. It might, perhaps, be possible to approximate towards a proper allotment of witty things said if all the collections of jests and ana could be collated, duplicates cut out (there would be a fearful slaughter) and a compendium made of the remainder ! The task would need the staff of an encyclopsedia — and not be worth the doing, for after all the wit is the thing, and though it would be more satisfactory to know that a remark attributed, say, to Curran was really uttered by Curran it would be no less impressive if it were established as the property of Whately. Where a jest is associated with a known name the reader gets something of the sense of suddenness, of unexpectedness, felt by its first hearers ; if it be given to some nameless person it suggests rather the witticism that is made, not bom, and moves us to the admiration of ingenuity rather than to amazement at the quickness of wit. In presenting anew something of the lives of the wits and humorists with examples of their things said, it cannot be pretended that any close collation of our anecdotal literature has been attempted, but I have sought so far as is possible to take the things said from the places where they were earliest recorded, and in cases of disputed paternity to father the bon mot upon the wit at whose door it was first laid. Old Aubrey tells us of one Thomas Archer (1554-1630), who was rector of Houghton Conquest, that he had " two thick quarto MSS. of his own collection ; one joci and tales, etc., and discourses at dinner. ... No doubt there are delicate things to be found there." Aubrey himself could get no sight of the books, but if they should OF WIT AND HUMOUR GENERALLY 15 still remain buried in some neglected muniment chest how pleasant for the finder to search through a collection that might even include some of the things said " at the Mermaid." One of the earliest puns has found its way into the history books in the record of Pope Gregory and the English slaves at Rome. " Non Angli sed angeli " — " Not Angles but angels " ; one of the earliest witticisms found in many of the collections, and often attributed to men of later date, is given in William of Malmesbury's Chronicle of the ninth-century philosopher, John the Scot, or Johannes Erigena. Erigena was at the French king's court a personage of considerable importance. The monarch asked him at dinner : " What separates a Scot from a sot ? " and received the prompt reply : " Only the table ! " CHAPTER II THE SPACIOUS DAYS " What things have we seen Done at the Mermaid ! heard words that have been So nimble and so full of subtle flame, As if that every one from whence they came Had meant to put his whole wit in a jest.'' Beaumont THE words which Master Francis Beaumont addressed to Ben Jonson may be hackneyed by frequent re- petition, but it is inevitable that they should stand in the forefront of any consideration of the wit of " the spacious days of great Elizabeth." It is perhaps in no small measure thanks to them that we first think of gatherings of the wits as taking place then, though we have no recorded echoes of the wit combats and though it is more than probable that such gatherings had taken place for generations earlier. It is true that Mr W. Carew Hazlitt, to whom we owe the reprinting of rare jest-books of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and who has made special studies of early jocular literature, says that it was the age immediately succeeding that of Shakespeare that saw the rise of the quip and crank, and the retort courteous, " conceits, clinches, flashes and whimzies," and all the rest of the merry motley company. If that were strictly true the stories told of More and others would i6 THE SPACIOUS DAYS 17 be merely later jests fathered on them, and the play of dialogue in Shakespeare's and other dramatic works would have to be regarded as the forecasting of a fashion instead of the heightened reflection of one. The use of quip and crank and the retort courteous by the dramatists may be taken as a sure illustration of the fact that such were already in vogue. It does not follow that all the reported Elizabethan jests date from the time of the Virgin Queen. Her Majesty's supposed remark — " Ye be burly, my Lord of Biirleigh, but ye make less stir than the Earl of Leicester " — smacks rather of a nineteenth- century pun manufacturer than of the Tudor Queen. Bacon has recorded a happy jest addressed to her Majesty, a jest the point of which remains unblunted by time. Mr Popham, when he was Speaker, and the Lower House had sat long, and done in effect nothing, coming one day to Queen Elizabeth, she said to him : " Now, Mr Speaker, what has passed in the Lower House ? " He answered : " If it please your Majesty, seven weeks." It was not until towards the close of the sixteenth century that jest-books began to be added to our literature, and these were mainly collections of brief anecdotes with only occasional examples of what we here understand as wit. There are but few recoverable examples of such wit of an earlier date. A couple of happy answers of Sir Thomas More may, however, be given. Thomas Manners, who had himself been made Earl of Rutland in 1525, reproached More with being overmuch elated with his preferment and thus verifying the old proverb " Honores mutant mores." " No, my lord," retorted Sir Thomas ; " the pun will do much better in English, ' Honours change Manners.' " The other story of the Tudor statesman concerns not his rise but his fall, showing that he coxJd treat of the one with as ready a turn of wit as the i8 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS other- Sir Thomas More being brought a prisoner to the Tower, the Ueutenant offered his good will and such poor cheer as he had, to which the deposed Lord Chancellor replied : "I verily believe as you say, so are you my good friend indeed, and would, as you say, with yoiur best cheer entertain me, for the which I most heartily thank you ; and assure yourself. Master Lieutenant, I do not mislike my cheer, but whensoever I so do, then thrust me out of your doors." This last is one of the stories of the state-murdered statesman recorded in his son-in-law's tender biography, and may therefore be accepted as genuine and as one of the rare exceptions to the rule that Mr Carew Hazlitt has enunciated that " the entire body of old-fashioned wit and wisdom is as exotic as a tropical plant within the Arctic Circle." We are here only con- cerned with wit, but to apply the same rule to wisdom is surely quite unwarranted. Another story of a Tudor judge is told of Sir Nicholas Bacon, who in the time of Elizabeth was importuned by a criminal to spare his life on account of kinship. " How so ? " demanded the judge. " Because my name is Hog and yours is Bacon ; and hog and bacon are so near akin that they cannot be separated." " Ay," responded the judge dryly, " but you and I cannot yet be kindred — for hog is not bacon until it be well hanged." II The name that stands out as the representative humorist of the latter part of the sixteenth century is that of Richard Tarlton, although by far the greater number of the " Jests " associated with his name had THE SPACIOUS DAYS 19 probably no real connexion with him — other than being labelled with it by the compiler of the book in which they were given to the world, in, as it is supposed, 1592. Some of them are, however, believed to embody real biographical details, and therefore " Tarlton's Jests " is a work that calls for more extended mention than do other of the " Shakespeare Jest Books." Richard Tarlton was a comic actor who died in 1588, and of whose life-story but little that is authentic, and a good deal that is contradictory, is known. According to Fuller he was bom at Condover in Shropshire, and was presumably the son of a farmer, the story running that while tending swine he was accosted by a servant of the Eaxl of Leicester, and his " happy unhappy answers " were such that in the sequel he was taken to court and became jester to Queen Elizabeth. Another account makes him a water carrier in London, and yet others describe him variously as an innkeeper in London and in Colchester, and as keeper of an ordinary, or eating-house, with the sign of the Castle, in Paternoster Row. Whatever his origin and early occupation may have been, it was as an actor that he became known, and vddely popular, so popular indeed, according to a con- temporary, that " the people began exceedingly to laugh when Tarlton first peep't out his head," and over thirty years after his death he was so well remembered that the same idea was re-rendered in verse : " Tarlton, when his head was only seene The Tire-house doore and Tapistrie betweene. Set all the multitude in such a laughter They could not hold for scarce an hour after."- As a clowning comedian Tarlton seems to have been the most notable actor of his age, and few performers of his time were honoured with so many references by con- 20 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS temporary writers ; then, too, as jester he is said to have had a happy faculty for improvizing, so that he may not unfairly be regarded as the Samuel Foote or Theodore Hook of his time. Nearly a century after his death he was given an extended notice as a " worthy " by Fuller, who said : " Our Tarlton was master of his faculty. When Queen Elizabeth was serious, I dare not say sullen, and out of good humour, he could undumpish her at his pleasure. Her highest favourites would, in some cases, go to Tarlton before they would go to the queen, and he was their usher to prepare their advantageous access unto her. In a word, he told the queen more of her faults than most of her chaplains and cured her melancholy better than all of her physicians. Much of his merriment lay in his very looks and actions, according to the Epitaph written upon him : — " • Hie situs est cujus poterat vox, actio, vultus. Ex Heraclito reddere Democritum.' Indeed, the self-same words spoken by another, would hardly move a merry man to smile ; which uttered by him, would force a sad soul to laughter." The high tribute of those closing words to Tarlton's vis comica may well remind us that it has been conjectured that Hamlet's words addressed to the skull of Yorick were Shakespeare's tribute to the memory of Richard Tarlton, though the poet is only supposed to have come to London a couple of years before Tarlton died ; and there is no record of their meeting. In the Harleian MS. is an early portrait of Tarlton with memorial verses by one John How of Norwich : " When he in pleasant wise The counterfeit expreste Of Clowne, with cote of russet hew And sturtups, with the teste. THE SPACIOUS DAYS 21 What merry many made When he appeared in sight ; The grave and wise as well as rude, At him did take delight. The partie nowe is gone, And closlie clad in claye ; Of all the jesters in the lande He bare the praise awaie." It is with many jests as with some of the daintiest fruit — they will not keep. And even as some fruit should be eaten as soon as it is ripe so some jests only retain their savour as it were their original speaking-while. We find this especially in the wit and humour that is enshrined in the thing said, and in the anedcote. A jest's prosperity lies not only in the ear that hears it but in the fact that it belongs to its time. We are perhaps further from the Elizabethan in this than in any other respect. Poetry, philosophy and drama of the best make a lasting appeal, but many manifestations of the humorous are of a fugacity that renders them stale after the lapse of one generation, and as it were mtmimified after a few genera- tions. This, as has been indicated in the earlier chapter, is nowhere more conclusively seen than in the collections of " good things " which presumably set sixteenth and seventeenth century tables in a roar, and it is particularly notable in the case of Richard Tarlton. Many of the " Jests " associated with his name are coarsenesses which changing taste has made merely objectionable. One or two of his sayings will suffice to indicate that which is now the best. In Bohim's " Character of Queen Elizabeth," written nearly a century after her death, we are shown Tarlton using rather the freedom of the court fool than any very rich form of wit : " At supper she [Queen Elizabeth] would divert herself with her friends and attendants ; and if they made no 22 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS answer, she would put them upon mirth and pleasant discourse with great civility. She would then also admit Tarlton, a famous comedian and a pleasant talker, and other such like men, to divert her with stories of the town, and the common jests or accidents ; but so that they kept within the bounds of modesty and chastity. In the winter-time, after supper, she would some time hear a song, or a lesson or two played upon the lute ; but she would be much offended if there was any rudeness to any person, any reproach or licentious reflection used. Tarlton, who was then the best comedian in England, had made a pleasant play, and when it was acting before the Queen, he pointed at Sir Walter Rawleigh and said : ' See, the Knave commands the Queen.' For which he was corrected by a frown from the Queen ; yet he had the confidence to add that he was of too much and too intolerable a power ; and going on with the same liberty, he reflected on the overgreat power and riches of the Earl of Leicester, which was so universally applauded by all that were present, that she thought fit for the present to bear these reflections with a seeming unconcernedness. But yet she was so offended, that she forbad Tarlton and all her jesters from coming near her table, being inwardly displeased with this impudent and unreasonable liberty." One of the anecdotes of Tarlton suggests some of the pranks recorded of Theodore Hook. It tells " how Tarlton bade himself to dinner to my Lord Mayor's." "A jest came in Tarlton's head where to dine, and thought he : in all that a man does, let him aim at the fairest, for sure, if I bid myself anjTwhere this day, it shall be to my Lord Mayors, and upon this goes to the Counter, and entered his action against my Lord Mayor, who was presently told of it, and sends for him. Tarlton waits THE SPACIOUS DAYS 23 dinner-time, and then comes : who was admitted pre- sently. ' Master Tarlton/ says my Lord Mayor, ' have you entered an action against me in the Poultry Counter ? ' ' My Lord,' says Tarlton, ' have you entered an action against me in the Wood Street Counter ? ' ' Not I, in troth,' says my Lord. ' No ! ' says Tarlton, ' he was a villain that told me so then ; but if it be not so, forgive me this fault, my Lord, and I wiU never offend in the next.' But in the end he begins to swear how he will be revenged on him that mocked him. But my Lord said : ' Stay, Mr Tarlton, dine with me, and no doubt after dinner you will be better minded.' ' I will try that, my Lord,' says Tarlton, ' and, if it alter mine anger, both mine enemy and I will thank you together for the courtesy.' " As one of the things for which Tarlton was famous was his readiness in extemporizing replies in verse to " themes " propounded, an example of this form of his humour may be given. This is " Tarlton's answer in defence of his flat nose " : " I remember I was once at a play in the country where, as Tarlton's use was, the play being done, every one [who was] so pleased [was] wont to throw up his theme ; amongst all the rest, one was read to this effect, word by word — " ' Tarlton, I am one of thy friends, and none of thy foes. Then I prithee tell how earnest thy flat nose : Had I been present at that time on those banks, I would have laid my short sword over his long shanks.' " Tarlton, mad at this question, as it was his property to take such a matter ill than well, very suddenly returned him this answer — " ' Friend or foe, if thou wilt needs know, Marke me well. With parting dogs and bears, then, by the ears. This chance feD : 34 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS But what of that ? Though my nose be flat. My credit to save. Yet very well I can by the smell Scent an honest man from a knave.' " Tarlton's readiness in extemporizing such replies in the very false gallop of verses was such that the trick of ex- temporizing came to be named " tarltonizing." In this regard too we find a similarity between Tarlton and Hook, who owed no small measure of his social reputation as a htimorist to his knack of impromptu versifying. Ill Although there may be something of truth in the state- ment that " men of wit are not as a rule men of letters, or even persons of literary training or experience," yet the annals of our men of wit serve to show that many of them are to be found in the literary circles of their time. The first association of wits in such gatherings is to be had in that epistle from Francis Beaumont to Ben Jonson a few lines from which stand at the head of this chapter. Tradi- tion says that the famous company formed a club, founded about 1603 by Sir Walter Ralegh, and that it included Shakespeare, Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher — ^the great twin brethren of our dramatic literature — and others. The tradition as to the origin of the " club " does not appear traceable beyond the end of the eighteenth century, but whether formally known as " clubbers " or not, there can be no doubt of the gatherings of the giants of those days ; and a more extended extract from the epistle seems to bring it before us better than could any mere chronicler of the THE SPACIOUS DAYS 25 things said — supposing that there had been a chiel among them taking notes : '■ Methinks the little wit I had is lost Since I saw you ; for wit is like a rest Held up at tennis, which men do the best With the best gamesters : what things have we seen Done at the Mermaid ! heard words that have been So nimble, and so full of subtile flame. As if that every one from whence they came Had meant to put his whole wit in a jest. And had resolved to live a fool the rest Of his dull life ; then when there hath been thrown Wit able enough to justify the town For three days past, wit that might warrant be For the whole city to talk foolishly TiU that were cancelled ; and when that was gone We left an air behind us, which alone Was able to make the two next companies Right witty, though but downright fools, mere wise." Of the things said there we have no record, but thanks to the poet the Mermaid stands as classic type of gathering places of the wits. Scarcely less famous is another place also associated with Ben Jonson, who appears to have dominated the literary circle of his prime as Samuel Johnson did a century and a half later. We know more of the Apollo Club which met at the Devil Tavern than we do of the Mermaid. The DevU stood between Temple Bar and Middle Temple Gate,^ and was a popular resort in the days of James the First, when it was kept by one Simon Wadloe — the " brave Duke Wadloe " of Jonson's Staple of News. The ApoUo Club used to meet in an upper room * Possibly it was a haunt of unbusy gentlemen of the law, where a much-occupied barrister could when necessary secure a deputy to do some of his work — and thus may have arisen the term '' devil " for a barrister undertaking work on behalf of another ! 26 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS of the tavern — presumably one of the earliest instances of a club having special premises. " Ben Jonson's Sociable Rules for the Apollo," translated as follows by Alexander Brome, may well be given as having their point for later gatherings of wits and humorists : — " Let none but guests, or clubbers, hither come. Let dunces, fools, sad sordid men keep home. Let learned, civil, merry men, b'invited. And modest too ; nor be choice ladies slighted. Let nothing in the treat offend the guest ; More for delight than cost, prepare the feast. The cook and purvey'r must our palates know ; And none contend who shall sit high or low. Our waiters must quick-sighted be, and dumb. And let the drawers quickly hear and come. Let not our wine be mixed, but brisk and neat, Or else the drinkers may the vintners beat. And let our only emulation be Not dnnking much, but talking wittily. Let it be voted lawful to stir up Each other with a moderate chirping cup ; Let not our company be or talk too much ; On serious things, or sacred, let's not touch With sated heads and bellies. Neither may Fiddlers unasked obtrude themselves to play. With laughing, leaping, dancing jests and songs. And whate'er else to grateful mirth belongs. Let's celebrate our feasts ; and let us see That all our jests without reflection be. Insipid poems let iro man rehearse. Nor any be compelled to write a verse. All noise of vain disputes must be forborne. And let no lover in a corner mourn. To fight and brawl, like hectors, let none dare. Glasses or windows break, or hangings tear. Who'er shall publish what's here done or said From our society must be banished ; Let none by drinking do or suffer harm. And, while we stay, let us be always warm.'- THE SPACIOUS DAYS 27 " To fight or brawl like hectors let none dare" reads curiously from " Rare Ben," who in 1598 had only saved his life from the hangman by pleading benefit of clergy after killing a fellow-player in a fight. Not only did Jonson thus draw up " Rules " for the fellowship of the Apollo but he also wrote a " Welcome," which was duly painted up on a board and placed, some say, over the chimne3T)iece, others say over the entrance into the room. " Welcome all, who lead or follow, To the Oracle of Apollo — Here he speaks out of his pottle. Or the Tripos, his Tower bottle ; All his answers are divine. Truth itself doth flow in wine. Hang up all the poor hop-drinkers. Cries old Sim the king of skinkers ; He that half of hfe abuses. That sits watering with the Muses. Those dull girls no good can mean us ; Wine it is the milk of Venus, And the Poet's horse accounted : Ply it and you all are mounted. 'Tis the true Phoebeian Uquor, Cheers the brain, makes wit the quicker, Pajrs all debts, cures all diseases. And at once three senses pleases. Welcome all, who lead or follow To the Oracle of Apollo."- One story that is told of the merry gatherings here seems to have a certain verisimilitude. It is said that among the company one evening was a country squire who began boasting of his lands and his tenants when he was interrupted by Jonson with : " What signify to us your dirt and yovs clods ? Where you have an acre of land I have ten acres of wit ! " 28 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS " Have you so, good Mr Wise-Acre ? " retorted the countryman. " Why, how now, Ben," said one of the party, " you seem to be stung." " I was never so pricked by a hobnail before," replied he. Another story concerning the Apollo Club records the manner of Thomas Randolph's inclusion in the company : " Mr Randolph having been at London so long as that he might truly have had a parley with his Empty Purse, was resolved to see Ben Jonson with his associates, which, as he heard, at a set time kept a Club together at the Devil Tavern near Temple Bar ; accordingly at the time appointed, he went thither, but being unknown to them, and wanting money, which to an ingenious spirit is the most daunting thing in the world, he peeped in the room where they were, which being espied by Ben Jonson, and seeing him in a scholar's threadbare habit. ' John Bopeep,' says he, ' come in,' which accordingly he did ; when immediately he began to rh3mie upon the meanness of his clothes, asking him if he could not make a verse ? and without to call for a quart of sack. There being four of them he immediately thus replied : " ' I, John Bopeep, to you four sheep, — With each one his good fleece ; If that you are willing to give me five shilling, 'Tis fifteen-pence a-piece.' " ' By Jesus ! ' quoth Ben Jonson (his usual oath), ' I believe this is my son Randolph,' which being made known to them, he was kindly entertained into their company, and Ben Jonson ever after called him son." If we have no record of the things uttered in the wit combats at the Mermaid, we have a contemporary story which shows Shakespeare as one of the wits. The recorder BEN JONSON FROM THE PAINTING BY GERARD HONTHORST IN" THE NATIONAL I'OKTRAIT GALLERY THE SPACIOUS DAYS 29 of this story was Sir Nicholas 1' Estrange, who was a youth at the time that Shakespeare died, and was probably personally known to Ben Jonson. The story, which has somewhat lost its point by lapse of time, runs thus : Shake- speare was godfather to one of Ben Jonson's children, and after the christening, being in a deep study, Jonson came to cheer him up, and asked him why he was so melancholy. " No, faith, Ben," says he, " not I ; but I have been considering a great while what should be the fittest gift for me to bestow upon my godchild, and I have resolved at last." " I prithee, what ? " said Jonson. " I'faith, Ben, I'll e'en give him a dozen good Lattin spoons — -and thou shalt translate them." Latten it should be added was the name of a mixed metal. Joe Miller — stepfather of every thrice-repeated jest — has the following anecdote about Ben Jonson : — ^My Lord Craven, in the reign of King James the First, was very de- sirous to see Ben Jonson, which being told to Ben, he went to my lord's house ; but being in a very tattered condition, as poets sometimes are, the porter refused him admittance, with some saucy language, which the other did not faU to return. My lord, happening to come out while they were wrangling, asked the occasion of it. Ben, who stood in need of nobody to speak for him, said, he understood his lordship desired to see him. " You, friend," said my lord ; " who are you ? " " Ben Jonson," replied the other. " No, no," quoth my lord, " you cannot be Ben Jonson, who wrote ' The Silent Woman,' you look as if you could not say Bo to a goose." " Bo ! " cried Ben. " Very well," said my lord, who was better pleased at the joke than offended at the affront ; " I am now convinced by your wit you are Ben Jonson." 30 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS IV John Taylor the " Water Poet "—one of the eccentrics of our literary history — deserves mention here for a double reason ; firstly, as a collector of witticisms and secondly, as utterer of witty things or as one on whom such have been fathered. Somewhere about 1630 Taylor published a small collection — one of the best of the kind ever published, it has been termed — to which he gave the large title " Wit and Mirth, chargeably collected out of Taverns, Ordin- aries, Inns, Bowling Greens and Alleys, Alehouses, Tobacco- shops, Highways and Waterpassages. Made up and fashioned into Clinches, Bulls, Quirkes, Yerkes, Quips and Jerkes, Apothegmically bundled up and garbled at the request of old John Garrett's Ghost." John Garrett appears to have been a jester of the early seventeenth century, of whom nothing is now recoverable. Upwards of a hundred and twenty books and pamphlets of all kinds were published by the Water Poet, who must have rivalled Daniel Defoe of a century later in assiduity, though not in genius. Few of Taylor's writings are now read, except by students of his period, but they form, as it were, a library of eccentricities in prose and verse. Born of humble parentage, at Gloucester, in 1580, Taylor had a varied career, first as sailor, then as waterman on the Thames, and afterwards as eccentric traveller and inn- keeper in Oxford, and later in London. His tavern was the Crown in Long Acre, and after the execution of Charles the First he had the temerity to alter the sign to the Mourning Crown, a change which was not long permitted, so he altered it again to the Poet's Head, putting up his own portrait with the words : " There's many a head stands for a sign. Then, gentle reader, why not mine ? "- THE SPACIOUS DAYS 31 On the other side was a frank inscription which tnight be adopted as motto by the whole race of poetasters : " Though I deserve not, I desire The laurel wreath, the poet's hire." One of the stories told of the " King's Majesties' Water Poet ' ' is that on hearing sorneone ask who invented the game of bowls he readily said : " No doubt the philosopher Bias." Taylor shows his own appreciation of humour and the lack of that saving quality in another travelling eccentric of the time, Coryat, the author of " Crudities, hastily gobbled up in Five months' travel," in a story told in his " Wit and Mirth." In pamphlet after pamphlet the Water Poet had assailed the Odcombian and he records that : " Master Thomas Coryat (on a time) complained against me to King James, desiring His Majesty that he would cause some heavy punishment to be inflicted upon me for abusing him in writing (as he said I had) ; to whom the King replied, that when the Lords of his honourable Privy Council had leisure, and nothing else to do, then they should hear and determine the difference betwixt Master Coryat, the scholar, and John Taylor, the sculler ; which answer of the King's was very acceptable to Master Coryat." There is a pleasantry often repeated, that has become as it were the common property which is traceable back to the Water Poet, for he tells us of a certain jackdaw that " if he doe not speake, yet I am in good hope that he thinks the more." A couple of stories which Taylor tells of himself show him possessed at once of something of the readiness which is of the essence of wit and of that appreciation of the ridiculous which is one aspect of humour. " An hostess of mine at Oxford roasted a shotilder of a ram, which, in the eating was as tough as a buff jerkin. 32 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS I asked her why the mutton was so tough. She said ' she knew not, unless the butcher deceived her in the age of it.' Nay, quoth I, there is I think another fault in it, which will excuse the butcher ; for, perhaps you roasted it with old wood. ' In truth,' replied she, ' that is likely enough, for my husband buys nothing but old stumps and knots which makes aU the meat we roast or boil so exceedingly tough that nobody can eat it.' " The second story shows how the Water Poet " had the merit of interrupting the servile etiquette of kneeling to the King." " I myself," says he, " gave a book to King James once, in the great chamber at Whitehall, as his Majesty canie from the Chapel. The Duke of Richmond said merrily to me, ' Taylor, where did you learn the manners to give the King a book and not kneel ? ' ' My Lord,' said I, ' if it please your Grace I do give now ; but when I beg anything then I will kneel.' " When Taylor the Water Poet died, a great change had come over the spirit of things in London, compared with the time when he was a rollicking pamphleteer ready to engage in any eccentric enterprise that would give him an excuse for writing a pajnphlet that would tickle the groundlings. The struggle between King and Parliament had dragged on to its tragic close at Whitehall, and though doubtless men met together and jested as of old, there were probably fewer gatherings of convivial " clubbers " in taverns, and there was no dominating master of such, as Ben Jonson had been earlier. It was a wonderful interlude that of the Commonwealth, too brief to be anything more than an experiment, and an experiment doomed to brevity THE SPACIOUS DAYS 33 from the fact that though to Amurath an Amurath may succeed to an Oliver there is little likely to be an Oliver. Much has been written about that mid part of the seven- teenth century, but in it there is little that is to our immed- iate purpose ; it was too strenuous, too full of portent for the chroniclers to trouble about recording the witty sayings of their fellows. A story that is told of Andrew Marvell seems to belong to the time when matters were still only strained between Charles the First and the Parliament. Heydock's Ordinary, which was situated just without Temple Bar, was much frequented by the Parliament men and gaUaJits, and here Marvell, having eaten heartily of boiled beef, roasted pigeons and asparagus, drank his pint of port, and on having the reckoning brought to him took a piece of money out of his pocket.held it up, and addressing his companions — certain Members known to be in the pay of the Crown — said, " Gentlemen, who would let himself out for dumer when he can have such a dinner for half- a-crown ? " CHAPTER III THE RESTORATION " You that delight in wit and mirth And love to hear such news That come from aJl parts of the earth, Turks, Dutch, and Danes, and Jews ; I'll send you to the rendezvous Where it is smoaking new ; Go hear it at a coffee-house. It cannot but be true.'* Jordan's " Triumph of London -' (1675) WHEN the mediocre Richard Cromwell proved unequal to the task of acting as his father's successor — ^the son of a Daedalus has often proved in- capable of flight — ^the long-exUed son of Charles the First returned, and was hailed with every manifestation of joy. Even those who had been some of the great admirers of the Protector were among the readiest to acclaim the restored King. Edmund Waller had written a lengthy " Panegy- rick " to Oliver in which he said : '- Hither th' oppressed shall henceforth resort. Justice to crave, and succour at your Court ; And then your Highness, not for ours alone. But for the world's Protector shall be known. . . . Still as you rise, the state, exalted too. Finds no distemper while 'tis changed by you ; Chang'd Uke the world's great scene ! when, without Noise, The rising sun night's vulgar Ught destroys.?'- 34 THE RESTORATION 35 Despite these brave words to the Protector, when the JRestoration came about, Waller was not long in singing the " Happy Return " of Charles, and did not disdain to open with the very image which he had used near the close of the Panegyric : " The rising sun complies with our weak sight, First gilds the clouds, then shews Ms globe of light At such a distance from our sight, as tho' He knew what harm his hasty beams would do. But your full majesty at once breaks forth In the meridian of your reign."- When King Charles read the poem addressed to himself he told the poet that it was reported that he had written better verses to Oliver Cromwell. " Please your Majesty," said the ready Waller, " we poets always excel in fiction." The neat way of getting out of a difficulty doubtless tickled the Merry Monarch, and Waller's conversation, says Aubrey, came to be better appreciated than that of any other man. Aubrey did not, however, gather many things said in his biographical disjecta membra, but he tells us that on hear- ing some bitter satirical verses repeated " Mr Waller replyed sur le champ ' that men write ill things well and good things ill ; that satyricall writing was downehUl, most easie and naturall ; that at Billingsgate one might hear great heights of such witt ; that the cursed earth naturally produces briars and thornes and weeds, but roses and fine flowers require cultivation.' " King Charles the Second is not only said to have been a ready appreciator of wit, but to have been no bad master of it himself ; he had, said Macaulay, " some talent for lively conversation." One story runs that Gilbert Burnet, Bishop of Rochester, preaching before the King, and having vehemently enunciated some truth, struck his fist on the desk before him saying : " Who dare deny this ? " 36 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS " Faith," said Charles, in audible reply, " nobody that is within reach of that fist of yours." Happier was his pointed definition of a courtier when he described Sidney Godolphin as " never in the way and never out of the way." Charles having been prevailed upon by one of his courtiers to confer knighthood upon a worthless fellow, when he was about to dub him on the shoulder the man drew back, and then hung his head as if put out of counten- ance. " Don't be ashamed," said the King ; " it is I who have the greatest reason to be so." Another story of the Merry Monarch runs that a few days after the discovery of the Rye House Plot he was walking in St James's Park without guards or attendants ; the Duke of York after- wards remonstrated with him on his imprudence. " Take care of yourself, brother James," replied Charles ; " don't make yourself uneasy about me ; for no man will kill me, to make you king." His dour brother, afterwards James the Second, was presumably neither so ready of tongue himself nor so appreciative of it in others ; a story is told against him to the effect that James having asserted that he never knew a modest man make his way at Court, received the reply from a hearer, " Please, your Majesty, whose fault is that ? " The King was silenced. The somewhat free-and-easy court of the Restoration was of a kind to form as it were a forcing house of wit — out of it, or born of its influence, came the whole range of the witty Restoration drama, witty with a freedom which has long passed out of fashion but which reflects in no uncertain way the spirit of the time. When the Prince of Orange came to England to become William the Third, five of the Seven Bishops who were sent to the Tower declared in his favour, but the other two refused. Dryden very happily said that " the seven golden THE RESTORATION 37 candlesticks were sent to be assayed in the Tower, and five of them proved prince's metal." ^ II One very notable feature of the life of the Restoration period — using that term as covering the closing thirty or forty years of the seventeenth century — ^was the growth of the coffee-house as a social centre. The Londoner of the period was largely moulded, says Macaulay, by the gre- garious habits formed, or rather fostered, by these estabhsh- ments, which sprang up all over the town. Where the few had frequented the taverns the many gathered in the coffee-houses.. The historian has a lengthy passage on the part played by these resorts in the days of Charles the Second and his successor. Every man of the upper and middle class, he declares, went to his coffee-house daily to hear the news and to discuss it. Every coffee-house soon came to have its special orators to whom the habitues listened with admiration " and who soon became what the journalists of our time have been called, a Fourth Estate of the realm." The court sought to put the coffee- houses down as centres of dangerous discussion, but sought in vain. " Foreigners remarked that the coffee-house was that which especially distinguished London from all other cities ; that the coffee-house was the Londoner's home, and that those who wished to find a gentleman commonly asked, not whether he lived in Fleet Street or Chancery Lane, but whether he frequented the Grecian or the Rainbow. Nobody was excluded from these places who laid down his peimy at the bar. Yet every rank and ' Prince's metal, an admixture of copper and zinc, was so called from Prince Rupert, its supposed inventor. 38 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS profession, and every shade of religious and political opinion, had its own headquarters. There were houses near St James's Park where fops congregated, their heads and shoulders covered with black or flaxen wigs not less ample than those which are now worn by the Chancellor and by the Speaker of the House of Commons. The wig came from Paris, and so did the rest of the fine gentleman's ornaments, his embroidered coat, his fringed gloves, and the tassel which upheld his pantaloons. The conversation was in that dialect which, long after it had ceased to be spoken in fashionable circles, continued in the mouth of Lord Foppington to excite the mirth of theatres. The atmosphere was like that of a perfumer's shop. Tobacco in any other form than that of richly scented snuff was held in abomination. If any clown, ignorant of the usages of the house, called for a pipe, the sneers of the whole assembly and the short answers of the waiters soon con- vinced him that he had better go somewhere else. Nor, indeed, would he have had far to go, For, in general, the coffee-rooms reeked with tobacco like a guard-room ; and strangers sometimes expressed their surprise that so many people should leave their own firesides to sit in the midst of eternal fog and stench. Nowhere was the smoking more constant than at WUl's. That celebrated house, situated between Covent Garden and Bow Street, was sacred to polite letters. There the talk was about poetical justice and the unities of place and time. There was a faction for Perrault and the modems, a faction for Boileau and the ancients. One group debated whether ' Paradise Lost ' ought not to have been in rhjmie. To another an envious poetaster demonstrated that Venice Preserved ought to have been hooted from the stage. Under no roof was a greater variety of figures to be seen. There were earls in stars and garters, clergymen in cassocks and V THE RESTORATION 39 bands, pert Templars, sheepish lads from the universities, translators and index-makers in ragged coats of frieze. The great press was to get near the chair where John Dryden sate. In winter that chair was always in the warmest nook by the fire, in summer it stood in the bal- cony. To bow to the Laureate, and to hear his opinion of Racine's last tragedy or of Bossu's treatise on epic poetry, was thought a privilege. A pinch from his snuff- box was an honour sufficient to turn the head of a young enthusiast. There were coffee-houses where the first medical men might be consulted. Doctor John Radcliffe, who in the year 1685 rose to the largest practice in London, came daily, at the hour when the Exchange was full, from his house in Bow Street, then a fashionable part of the capital, to Garraway's, and was to be found sur- rounded by surgeons and apothecaries, at a particular table. There were Puritan coffee-houses where no oath was heard, and whdre lank-haired men discussed election and reprobation through their noses; Jew coffee-houses where dark-eyed moneychangers from Venice and from Amsterdam greeted each other ; Popish coffee-houses where, as good Protestants believed, Jesuits planned over their cups another great fire, and cast silver bullets to shoot the King." ^ Such is the historian's summary of the importance of these gathering places, the first of which had been started, before the Commonwealth came to an end, by a Turkey merchant who had acquired in the Orient a taste for " Mocha's berry brown." The essajrists of a few years later, Addison, Steele and their colleagues, had much to say about coffee-house gatherings ; and we know more, thanks to the growth of the habit of gossiping on paper, of the coffee-houses of the early part of the eighteenth '^ Macaulay's -- History of England,'' chap. iii. 40 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS century than we do of those of the closing decades of the seventeenth. Pepys tells us how on 3rd February 1663- 1664, " in Covent Gardens to-night going to fetch home my wife, I stopped at the great Coffee house there, where I never was before : where Dryden, the poet, I knew at Cambridge and all the wits of the town, and Harris the player, and Mr Hoole of our College," and, again, of " very witty and pleasant discourse " at Will's. This, one of the best known of the coffee-houses, which took its name from William Urwick the landlord, stood on the west side of Bow Street at the comer of Russell Street. in A good coffee-house story is told of a Dr Busby, pre- sumably the headmaster of Westminster School, though the hero of it may have been the later Dr Busby noted as a composer. Busby, a very small man, was accosted by a very tall Irish baronet with : " May I pass to my seat, O giant ! " " Pass, O Pigmy ! " said the doctor, making way for him. " Oh, sir," said the baronet, " my expression alluded to the size of your intellect." " And my expression, sir," retorted the doctor, " to the size of yours." Another coffee-house story suggests that the keepers of such occasionally caught the trick of wit from their customers. A celebrated resort of this kind, Lockit's Coffee-house, was frequented by Sir George Etherege, the dramatist, who having run up a score which he found himself unable to pay absented himself for a time. In consequence of this, Mrs Lockit sent to dun him and to threaten him with an action. Etherege told the messenger THE RESTORATION 41 that if Mrs Lockit came he shotdd certainly kiss her. On hearing this message she called for her hood and scarf, telling her husband when he remonstrated " that she would see if there was any fellow alive who had the impudence ! " " Prithee, my dear, don't be so rash," said Lockit ; " you don't know what a man may do in a passion." Of Congreve, who, as Thackeray puts it, splendidly frequented the coffee-houses, we have a story which shows that the dramatist did not keep all his wit for his plays ; possibly, like a later playwright, having hit off a good thing in the give-and-take of talk he remembered it later and put it in the mouth of one of his characters. Congreve is said to have been disputing a point of fact with a sententious but not singularly sensible man, when the latter said, with as he doubtless thought clinching emphasis : "I'll wager my head that the fact is as I have stated it." " I accept it," said Congreve, " for even trifles show respect." A niunber of coffee-house stories will be found in other chapters, dealing with later periods than that of the present one. Though it was in the latter part of the seventeenth century that the coffee-house became known as a resort of the wits, shortly after its establishment as an institution, it continued to provide a place where men of the most diverse professions and ideas could meet and talk all through the eighteenth century and on into the early part of the nineteenth. At the Chapter Coffee-house in Paternoster Row there used to be a regular gathering of men known as the " Wittinagemot " which lasted certainly up to 1805. Here, too, we are told used to meet a " Wet Paper Club," the members of which gathered to read and discuss the newspapers while they were still wet from the press — a dry paper being regarded as already a stale commodity. The members of the " Wittinagemot " are said to have 42 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS been a merry party — including many doctors and book- sellers — but none of their sajings seem to have been recorded. IV Tom Brown, " of facetious memory " to use the label which Addison attached to him so firmly that he is scarcely ever mentioned without it, is a writer perhaps even less known outside the ranks of students than Taylor the Water Poet ; yet he occupied in the latter part of the seventeenth century much the same position as that of Taylor in the earlier. Born in 1663, the son of a Shropshire farmer, he went at the age of fifteen to Christ Church, Oxford. Still in his teens his irregularities were such that Dr Fell, the dean of his college, threatened to expel him, but on receiving a submissive letter promised to forgive him if he would extemporize a translation of Martial's epigram beginning " Non amo te, Sabidi." Brown responded with lines that have become familiar in our mouths as house- hold words, though probably few of those who repeat them are aware of their authorship : " I do not love thee, Dr Fell, The reason why I cannot tell ; But this I know, and know full well, I cannot love thee, Dr FeU.'' The witty readiness not only won forgiveness for the earlier faults but also for its own impertinence, and we are told that when Dr Fell died it was Tom Brown who wrote the epitaph on his tomb in Christ Church. After leaving the university, without a degree, Tom Brown sought to set up as author, but not successfully, and at the age of twenty- two he wrote to a friend : " The prodigal son when he was THE RESTORATION 43 pressed by hunger and thirst, joined himself to a swine- herd ; and I have been driven by the same stimuH to join myself to a swine, an ignorant pedagogue about twelve miles out of town." This was at Kingston-on-Thames, where he was afterwards appointed headmaster of the grammar school, presumably a very young headmaster, for he was only at Kingston for three years before giving up the apparently uncongenial labour of teaching and joining himself finally to " the adventurous rovers of the pen." He wrote satires, pamphlets and translations, and that he established a reputation with his contemporaries is shown by the fact that he was buried in Westminster Abbey and by the Addisonian label affixed to his name ten years after his death. It was as a witty and humorous writer that he was chiefly known, the low haunts which he frequented, the kind of company he kept, militating against his conversational humour being recorded. His out- spokenness as pamphleteer more than once got him into trouble, a " Sat}^: upon the French King on the Peace of Reswick " leading to imprisonment. Tradition says that he owed his release to the boldly addressing to the Lords in Council a pindaric ode, concluding pointedly : " The pulpit alone Can never preach down The fops of the town. Then pardon Tom Brown And let him write on. But if you had rather convert the poor sinner. His fast writing mouth may be stopped with a dinner. Give him clothes to his back, some meat and much drink. Then clap him close prisoner without pen and ink And your petitioner shall neither pray, write, nor think." Tom Brown, says Addison, has the distinction of being the first satirist who made himself a " sjoicopist," writing 46 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS houses grew the clubs, and the early part of the eighteenth century has been described as the golden period of clubs. One of the places of fashionable resort — the Cocoa Tree in St James's Street which afterwards became a club of the same name — shared with Will's the title of the Wits' Coffee-house from the gatherings that took place there. Samuel Garth, the doctor poet, was an habitue and one morning when he was conversing with a couple of friends there, Nicholas Rowe, scarcely remembered to-day as one-time Poet Laureate, entered. Rowe is described as having been particularly vain of being noticed by persons of consequence, and seeking to be introduced to Garth's companions took a seat in a box nearly opposite that in which the trio sat. After repeatedly seeking unsuccess- fully to catch Garth's eye, he requested the waiter to ask him for his snuff-box. After taking a pinch he returned it, but asked again for it so repeatedly that Garth, perceiving his drift and determined not to humour him, took out a pencil and wrote on the lid the two Greek characters (p P (phi, rho = Fie! Rowe!). On perceiving this the neatly snubbed poet retired chagrined. Another story of Sir Samuel Garth — who has the distinction of being a pre-Popeian smoother of the heroic couplet — is that one evening at the Kit Cat Club, of which he was a member, he said that he had fifteen professional visits to pay, so could not stay for long. Some good wine was produced and the company was so entertaining that he forgot his engagements and stayed on ; when Steele re- minded him of his patients. " It's no great matter," said Garth, " whether I see them to-night or not, for nine of them have such bad constitutions that all the physicians in the world can't save them ; and the other six have such good constitutions that all the physicians in the world THE AUGUSTAN PERIOD 47 can't kill them." Which suggests that doctors do not mind uttering jestsjagainst their own profession such as they would be likely to resent from mere laymen. A kindred doctor must have been Radcliff, who, a rash speculator at the South Sea Bubble time, came into Garraway's Coffee-house only to be told that a venture in which he had put five thousand guineas had gone and his money was lost. " Well," said he, " 'tis but going up five thousand pairs of stairs the more ! " This anecdote is sometimes quoted with the additional comment that Tom Brown said the answer deserved a statue ; somebody may have made the remark, but Tom Brown " of facetious memory " had been dead for sixteen years when the South Sea Bubble burst. It was at Button's Coffee-house that Pope, whose wit made him a poet, uttered one of the few conversational witticisms associated with his name when he declared of Samuel Patrick that he was an illustration of the fact that " a dictionary maker might know the meaning of one word, but not of two put together." At Button's, too, according to another story. Pope had the tables turned upon him when a stranger resented the airs which the poet put on. Pope and some friends are described as poring over a Latin manuscript in which there was a passage for which none of them could find a satisfactory translation. A young officer who had heard the discussion asked if he might be permitted to look at the passage. " Oh ! " said Pope sarcastically, "by all means ; pray let the young gentleman look at it." Upon which the officer took up the manuscript, and after examining it for a while pointed out that it only wanted a note of interrogation to make the whole intelligible. " And pray, master," said Pope sneeringly, " what is a note of interrogation ? " "A note of interrogation," replied the young officer, with a 48 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS significant look at the poet, and justifiable cruelty, " is a little crooked thing that asks questions." Sir Godfrey Kneller is credited with making a similarly unkind jest on the poet's physical appearance. There had been a lively discussion in which the artist had been laying down the law when Pope sarcastically broke in with : " If Sir Godfrey had been consulted in the creation of the world, it would have been more perfect than it is." KneUer neatly but cruelly retaliated with : " There are some little things in it I think I could have mended" — ^with a significant glance at his diminutive adversary. Will's, too, was known as the Wits' Coffee-house though Swift has left us no flattering account of it, for he said that the worst conversation he ever heard in his life was at Will's, where the wits (as they were called) used formerly to assemble — that is to say, five or six men, who had writ plays, or at least prologues, or had a share in a miscellany, came thither and entertained one another with their trifling composures, with as important an air as if they had been the noblest efforts of human nature, or that the fate of kingdoms depended upon them. A coffee-house story of the author of " Tristram Shandy " deserves recording here as a neat example of carefully elaborated wit — ^wit in action as much as in words. Sterne entered one of these places of resort and shortly after heard a spruce well-powdered young fellow who wajs seated near the fire speaking of the clergy as a body of disciplined impostors and systematic hypocrites. Sterne got up from the place he had first taken and, while the young man was stUl holding forth, approached the fire, patting and coaxing on the way a favourite little dog. Coming near the speaker Sterne took up the dog, still continuing to pat him, and addressed the young feUow thus : " Sir, this would be the prettiest little animal in the THE AUGUSTAN PERIOD 49 world, had he not one disorder." " What disorder is that ? " came the inevitable question. " Why, sir," replied Sterne, " one that always makes him bark when he sees a gentleman in black." " That is a singular disorder," said the young man, " pray, how long has he had it ? " " Sir," answered Sterne pointedly, but looking at him with affected gentleness, " ever since he was a puppy." II Jonathan Swift was described by a lady who knew him as " a very odd companion (if that expression is not too familiar for so extraordinary a genius) ; he talks a great deal and does not require many answers, he has infinite spirits, and says abundance of good things in his common way of discourse." Yet he declared in writing to Pope that the chief end he proposed in all his work was " to vex the world rather than divert it." He thus appears as one who, while prepared to " vex " the many, could not help deUghting the few. He is said to have been the chief spirit of " the witty club " that gathered weekly at Dr Delany's house in Dublin, and a number of his happy mots are recorded, for he had in a strong degree the faculty of bringing the apparently remote into instant contact with matter of the moment, the result of which is wit as sure as the clashing of clouds in a thunderstorm results in lightning. As we are startled by the one phenomenon so may we well be by the other. Take for example the story that is told of a lady's mantua having caught in a violin and dragged it to the ground, and Swift's instant applica- tion of a line from Virgil : " Mantua, vae miserae nimium vicinae Cremonse.-' The story is given by Joe Miller, but not ascribed 50 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS to Swift, the speaker being merely given as " a gentleman." More laboured, perhaps, was another classical applica- tion, when to an old gentleman who had lost his spectacles Swift offered the seemingly ridiculous consolation that if it rained all night he would surely get them back in the morning for " Nocte pluit tota ; redeunt spectacula mane." Many diverse kinds of retort are recorded of Swift. When a forward young man had taken iU some remark addressed to him and said : " I would have you know, sir, that I set up for a wit," the Dean bluntly replied : " Do you, indeed, then take my advice and sit down again." There is an unwonted kindliness in his answer to Lord Wharton, the profligate son of a profligate father, who had been boasting of several wild frolics in which he had been engaged : " My Lord, let me recommend one more frolic to you — take a frolic to be good ; rely upon it you will find it the pleasantest frolic you ever were engaged in." When the Prince of Orange landed — soon to be ac- claimed as King William the Third — ^he was reported to have harangued a mob (Swift would have termed it a rabble, for he objected to the other word) saying : " We are come for your good — for all your goods." On hearing this Swift sarcastically commented : " A universal principle of all governments ; but, like most other truths, only half told — ^he should have said goods and chattels." When William the Third placed under the Royal Arms the motto Non rapui sed recipi, Swift's comment was : " The receiver is as bad as the thief." Hearing Lady Carteret, wife of the Lord Lieutenant, say: " The air of Ireland is very good," Swift is said to have fallen on his knees and said : " For God's sake, madam, don't JONATHAN SWIFT FROM THE BUST IN ST. PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL, DUBLIN THE AUGUSTAN PERIOD 51 say so in England, for if you do they will certainly tax it." A lawyer asked the Dean if the parsons and the devil were opposed in a suit which side would be likely to gain it. " The devil, no doubt," was the unexpected answer, " as he would have all the lawyers on his side." Another dig at the lawyers is told of Swift. Having preached an assize sermon in Ireland he was invited to dinner by one of the judges. As the preacher had been very severe on all concerned in the law, a young barrister, thinking to be smart at his expense, inquired : " Doctor, if it were possible for the devil to die, don't you think that a clergyman might be found to preach his funeral sermon ?" " Very likely," rephed Swift, " and were I the man pitched upon I should do as I have just done by his disciples — I should give him his due." Some jests appear and reappear in the chronicles of wit in almost endless variety and are ascribed to many utterers. One variant of a familiar story is put down to Swift in the following. A gentleman at whose house the Dean was dining after dinner introduced remarkably small hock glasses, and turning to his guest said : " Mr Dean, I shall be happy to take a glass of hie, haec, hoc, with you." " Sir," replied Swift pointedly : " I shall be happy to comply, but it must be out of a hujus glass." Swift wrote a savage lampoon on Sergeant Bettesworth, in the course of which occurred the conciliatory lines : ■'■ Thus at the bar the booby Bettesworth, Though half a crown o'erpays his sweat's worth ; Who knows in law nor text nor margent. Calls Singleton his brother sergeant."- Bettesworth called upon the Dean to disavow the offen- sive lines or else be prepared to take the consequence. Swift with greater regard for wit than veracity replied : 52 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS " Sir, when I was a young man I had the honour of being intimate with some great legal characters, particularly Lord Somers, who, knowing my propensity to satire, advised me when I lampooned a knave or a fool never to own it. Conformably to that advice,! tell you I am not the author." At a Dublin civil feast one of the dignitaries, raising his glass, said : " Mr Dean, the Trade of Ireland." " Sir," replied Swift, with great quickness, ' I drink to no memories." At his own dinner-table on one occasion he gravely told his cook to remove a joint of meat and do it less, and on her alleging that it was impossible he said that he hoped in future when she chose to commit a fault she would choose one which might be mended. The dinner-table talk turning one day on family antiqui- ties the hostess enlarged overmuch upon her own descent, declaring that her ancestors' names began with " De " and of course they were of ancient French origin. " And now, madam," said Swift, when she had concluded, " wUl you be so good as to help me to some of that D-umpling ? " Yet another story is told of the Dean in this connexion. A gentleman seeking to persuade him to accept an invita- tion to dinner said : " I'll send you my bill of fare." " Send me rather your bill of company," answered Swift, showing his appreciation of the truth that not that which is eaten but those who eat form the more important part of a good dinner. When he started the Brothers' Club about 1713 he said : " We take in none but men of wit or men of interest." In the " Journal to Stella " Swift says that at the Brothers' Club Colonel Disney said of Miss Kingdown, a maid of honour who was " a little old," " that since she could not get a husband the Queen should give her a brevet to act as a married woman." In a story that is told of a conversation in which Con- greve, Swift, Ambrose Philips, and others took part, the THE AUGUSTAN PERIOD 53 Dean gives a description of himself. The talk had been running for some time on Julius Caesar, when Philips inquired what sort of a person the Roman conqueror was supposed to have been. He was told that from medals it appeared that Julius was a thin-faced, small man. " Now for my part," said Philips, a very vain man and a bit of a dandy, giving an exact description of himself : " I should take him to have been of a lean make, pale complexion, extremely neat in his dress and five feet seven inches high." Swift allowed him to go on, and when he had finished said : " And I, too. Philips, should take him to have been a plump man, just five feet five inches high ; not very neatly dressed, in — a black gown with pudding sleeves ! " III There is a story (it has been fathered upon Daniel Defoe) sometimes unthinkingly repeated to the effect that when Sir Richard Steele entered Parliament, and did not distinguish himself as an orator, someone said that he " had better have remained ' spectator ' than started ' tatler.' " The mot would have had more force in it if Steele had not been the second before he became the first — if The Tatler had not preceded The Spectator. To generalize it has been said in a horrible pun is generally to lie, yet it may, generally speaking, be said that in the titles of Steele's and Addison's essay-periodicals we have a rough and ready differentiation of the wit and the humorist. The wit is a " Tatler," one who says the ready thing that springs to his tongue, the humorist is a " Spectator," one who, observing, sees the broader fun of things. Both Sir Richard Steele and Joseph Addison, the men primarily responsible for these delightful essay-miscellanies, were humorists, as 54 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS their writings abundantly prove ; of their wit and humour as social companions we have but little definite evidence. Indeed one story of Addison, though it shows him hitting off a happy phrase, chiefly strikes one as remarkable evi- dence, if accurate, of his inability to enjoy the wonderful humour of another. The story runs that after reading the essays of Montaigne he threw the volume aside so impa- tiently that a friend present asked what he thought of the famous French author. " Think," replied Addison, " why, that a dark dungeon and fetters would probably have been of some service in restoring his infirmities." " How, sir," said the other, " imprison a man for singularity in writing." " Why not ? " came the retort ; " had he been a horse he would have been pounded for straying out of his bounds ; and why, as a man, he ought to be more favoured I really do not understand." Steele had probably more of the liveliness of talk, more of that true clubbability out of which wit so often springs, than his severer friend, though the days of boswellizing had not begun when he was frequenting the taverns and coffee- houses, and sending tender notes explaining his absence to " dear Prue " at the Hampton Court " Hovel," or wher- ever his home happened to be. Possibly there were in hirn some of the characteristics which he noted in his tribute to Dick Estcourt, the actor, and leader of the original Beef Steak Club, in which he has given us a lively note of a clubbable man, a man of the kind who may not be witty in himself but who is of those who make the human atmos- phere which produces wit. " The best man that I know for heightening the real gaiety of a company is Estcourt, whose jovial humour diffuses itself from the highest person at an entertainment to the meanest waiter. Merry tales, accompanied with apt gestures and lively representations of circumstances and persons, beguile the gravest mind THE AUGUSTAN PERIOD 55 into a consent to be as humorous as himself. Add to this, that when a man is in his good graces, he has a mimicry that does not debase the person he represents, but which, taken from the gravity of the character, adds to the agree- ableness of it." Of Steele himself one story may be given, illustrating at once the monetary difficulties in which he so often found himself and the dry humour with which he could treat the subject. The story dates back to Joe Miller, and thus to a period within ten years of the subject's death. " When Sir Richard Steele was fitting up his great room in York Buildings, for public orations, that very room which is now so worthily occupied by the learned and eximious Mr Professor Lacy. He happened at one time to be pretty much behindhand with his workmen, and coming one day among them to see how they went forward, he ordered one of them to go into the rostrmn and make a speech, that he might observe how it could be heard, the fellow mounting, and scratching his pate, told him he knew not what to say, for in truth, he was no orator. ' Oh ! ' said the knight, ' no matter for that ; speak anything that comes upper- most.' ' Why, here. Sir Richard,' said the fellow, ' we have been working for you these six weeks, and cannot get one penny of money, pray, sir, when do you design to pay us ? ' ' Very well, very well,' said Sir Richard, ' pray come down, I have heard enough, I cannot but own you speak very distinctly, tho' I don't admire your subject.' " According to Joe Miller, Steele was made the umpire in an amusing difference between two uimamed disputants. These two were talking about religion in Button's Coffee- house, when one of them said : " I wonder, sir, you should talk of religion, when I'll hold you five guineas you can't say the Lord's Prayer." " Done," said the other, " and Sir Richard Steele shall hold the stakes." The money being 56 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS deposited, the gentleman began with : " I beheve in God " and so went right through the Creed ! " Well," said the other ; " I did not think he cotdd have done it ! " ^ William Warburton (1698-1779), best remembered as the friend of Alexander Pope and annotator of his works, who became Bishop of Gloucester some years after the poet's death, was a strong controversialist. His readiness to plunge into controversy with book, pamphlet or " notes " was eminently characteristic of the time when not only were the political parties of the country becoming more sharply differentiated but when in the Church, in letters and other departments of thought, men had a way of rang- ing themselves in opposing rank. At first an anti-Popeite, Warburton came to be the poet's friend and ardent cham- pion. Eventually he became better known as a scholar and writer than as a churchman, thus inspiring Churchill's not very severe satire : " A curate first, he read and read. And laid in — while he should have fed The souls of his neglected flock — Of reading such a mighty stock That he o'ercharged the weary brain With more than she could weU contain."- The best of the sajnngs attributed to Warburton is one that is also frequently fathered on other wits — ^that is, the * I have known a not dissimilar thing occur in a London club. It was at the time when Mr Thomas Hardy's " Jude the Obscure " was setting tongues wagging, and a know-all barrister was inveighing with great emphasis against Mr Hardy's novels. One or two were mentioned by a distinguished artist as worthy of praise, but the barrister would have none of them. " But surely,"- said the artist, with a sly glance at the other men present, " you do not include - The Amazing Marriage '- in your condemnation ? " " That,'' answered the barrister, falling headlong into the trap, "is an awful book, one of the worst that Hardy has given us " ! THE AUGUSTAN PERIOD 57 answer to the question what is orthodoxy : " Orthodoxy is my doxy, heterodoxy is another man's doxy." The saying is sometimes attributed to Sydney Smith, and some- times to Rowland Hill ; the flavour of it seems to belong to an earlier century than the nineteenth, by which time the term doxy for a mistress had at least fallen into infrequent use. Warburton showed neat sarcasm when he said of Mallet's projected " Life of Marlborough," the same author having already published a " Life of Bacon," that he would prob- ably forget in doing it that Marlborough was a soldier as he had forgotten that Bacon was a philosopher." Not unlike that was his comment on DowdesweU being appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer in succession to Lord Ljrttelton who had proved his incapacity — " The one could never in his life learn that two and two make four, while the other knew nothing else." CHAPTER V JOE MILLER " He is the jocular laureate of the new Hanoverian time and of all time to come. . . . He wiU endure as long as the earth's crust — as long as Shakespeare, and longer, perchance, than MUton."- W. Carew Hazlitt IN a recently published book of reminiscences ^ I came across the following passage : — " A very favourite book of mine and one that I recommend to my readers if they can get it, which is doubtful, is ' Joe Miller's Jest Book.' Do not be put off with anything but the first edition, or any spurious versions like the very dull one by Mark Lemon. If you are fortunate enough to get the first edition your fortune as a raconteur is made, for it is crammed with good things ; and though there are some chestnuts among them, with judicious warming they will come out as good as new, and even if your hearers have heard them before in the dim and distant past they will open long disused cells of association and recollection in the brain, just as those old-world smells of pot- pourri or of antiquated scents often bring back such floods of memory." Dr Farquharson's advice to his readers to get the first edition of " Joe Miller " may be sound, though but few of 1 " In and Out of Parliament.'' By the Rt. Hon. Robert Farquharson. 58 JOE MILLER 59 them axe likely to be able to follow his prescription, for that same first edition does not often appear " on the market " and when it does do so commands a goodly price. His reference to Mark Lemon's " Jest Book " is neither kind nor just, for that little volume is by no means a " dull " example among such compilations, and the fact that it was reprinted about ten times in the thirty years that followed upon its publication, in 1864, suggests it has had many readers who would not endorse Dr Farquharson's verdict. But to return to Joe Miller, whose name may be regarded as of classic standing in the department of anecdotal literature. In case anyone should wish to search for a copy of the desired first edition, I may quote the lengthy title-page. It runs as follows : — " Joe Miller's Jests ; or, the Wit's Vade-Mecum ; being a collection of the most brUliant Jests ; the politest Re- partees ; the most elegant Bon Mots and most pleasant Short Stories in the English language. First carefully collected in the company, and many of them transcribed from the mouth of the Facetious Gentleman whose name they bear ; and now set forth and published by his lament- able friend and former companion, Elijah Jenkins, Esq. Most humbly inscribed to those Choice Spirits of the Age, Captain Bodens, Mr Alexander Pope, Mr Professor Lacy, Mr Orator Henley, and Job Baker, the Kettle-Drummer. London : Printed and sold by T. Read, in Dogwell Court, White's Fryars. Fleet Street. MDCCXXXIX." The Elijah Jenkins of the title-page was a pseudonym, that of John Mottley (1692-1750), a dramatist and bio- grapher of the period whose plays and lives are forgotten, the books being buried — ^without any fear of the literary restirrection-man — ^in the oblivion of great libraries, though their titles are to be found embalmed in biographi- cal dictionaries. How far Mottley was justified in placing 6o A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS Joe Miller's name upon the title-page of his collection of jests cannot now be determined. It may be that as the names of Scogin, Tarlton and others had been used so the compiler used the name of Miller for its topical value, the actor having recently died. It may be also that Mottley knew Miller, had heard him as a teller of stories and was pajraig a debt of gratitude to the deceased raconteur. All this, however, is merest speculation. Sir Sidney Lee, in his account of Miller in The Dictionary of National Biography, is unduly severe on John Mottley, for it may be conjectured that but for the " Jests " Miller would scarcely have been regarded as deserving two whole pages of the Dictionary. If Mottley made a misuse of the actor's name then grievously hath Mottley answered for it, as in conferring immortality upon Joe Miller he lost his own opportunity of fame. 11 When first Joe Miller — ^his name though given according to different authorities as Joseph and Josias was unques- tionably Josias, but we may keep to the familiar abbrevia- tion — is to be heard of is when in 1709, at the age of twenty- five, he joined the Drury Lane company, being described on his appearance in the part of Teague on the production of .Sir Robert Howard's The Committee as one " who never appeared on the stage before." For nearly thirty years he continued at Drury Lane, with one of two brief gaps, as when owing to " some mean economies of the managers," he left that theatre in 1731 and appeared for a time at Goodman's Fields. It was probably only for a brief time that he left Drury Lane, for m pamphlet protests against certain proposed legislation he is referred to as one of the eight lessees and one of the comedians of the JOP: miller (IN the character of TEAGUE in "THE COMMITTEE") FROM AN ENGRAVING BY A. MILLER AFTER THE PAINTING BV C. STOl'i'ELAER JOE MILLER 6i theatre and his Christian name is invariably given as Josias. That he was a popular actor may be gathered from his long stay at Drury Lane and from the fact that, a " full proof of the force of his abilities," he long enjoyed a good salary. His last appearance was as Abel Drugger in The Alchemist on 27th June 1738. On 15th August following he died, presumably at his residence in Clare Market. He was buried in the Upper Ground (in Portugal Street) of St Clement's Church, a graveyard that was cleared away half-a-century ago to make the grounds of King's College Hospital. On Miller's gravestone was inscribed the follow- ing epitaph, written by Stephen Duck, the " Thresher- poet " on whom Swift wrote a severe epigram : — " Here lie the remains of honest Joe Miller, who was a tender husband, a sincere friend, a facetious companion, and an excellent comedian. He departed this life the 15th day of August, 1738, aged 54 years. If humour, wit, and honesty could save The humorous, witty, honest from the grave, This grave had not so soon its tenant found, With honesty and wit and humour crown'd. Or could esteem and love preserve our health And guard us longer from the stroke of Death, The stroke of death on him had later fell Whom all mankind esteemed and loved so well.'' "May you ever have the luck," said Swift, in his rhapsody " On Poetry," " To rhjone almost as ill as Duck," and the severity seems justified of one who could rhyme, even in an epitaph, such ill-accorded words as health and death. The epitaph is interesting, however, for its triple insistence upon the wit and humour of one who " is vaguely reported to have been of convivicd disposition." It has been said that Joe Miller lived in Clare Market, 62 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS and there, according to "very doubtful evidence," he was at one time keeper of a tavern. Other stories say that he was in the habit of frequenting the Bull's Head in Spring Gardens, Gharing Cross, and the Black Jack in Portsmouth Street, Clare Market. It is stated that he was unable to read, and that he married chiefly that he might have some- body always at hand to read his parts to him ! This seems scarcely credible of an actor who evidently won to no mean position in his profession, though it is stated without question in his latest biography.^ Others stories suggest that the collection of " Jests " was associated with his name by way of further jest, for it is said that he was really taciturn and saturnine — ^he, the " lively comic actor " of one critic, the " natural spirited comedian " of another — and " was in the habit of spending his afternoons at the Black Jack, a well-known public-house in Ports- mouth Street, Clare Market, which was at the time frequented by most of the respectable tradesmen of the neighbourhood, who, from Joe's imperturbable gravity, whenever any risible saying was recounted, derisively ascribed it to him. After his death, having left his famUy unprovided for, advantage was taken of this badinage. A Mr Motley, a well-known dramatist of the day, was em- ployed to collect all the stray jests then current on town. Joe Miller's name was prefixed on them, and from that day to this, the man who never uttered a jest, has been the reputed author of every jest, past, present and to come." The whole of this reads like the invention of a nineteenth- century scribe, as he would doubtless have termed himself. Firstly, if the " Jests " had been published for the benefit of Joe Miller's family, how much could those concerned have expected to raise for such a purpose with a slender volume sold at one shilling ? Secondly, if the title was a * In The Dictionary of National Biography. JOE MILLER 63 jest the point of which was to be understood only by the worthy tradesmen of the neighbourhood who frequented the Black Jack, how could it be expected that it should be appreciated by that wider public whose contributions were desired ? And, yet again, how could Joe Miller have won his imdoubted reputation as comedian, how could even an epitaph have harped upon his wit and humour, had he been taciturn and saturnine ? No ; the story quoted bears the impress of mere invention, or at the least of the result of a little bit invented and a little bit inferred, with which, where facts are skimpy, writers have been known to piece them out. Mr W. Carew Hazlitt, who, in the lines quoted at the head of this chapter foretells a fair modicum of immortality for Joe Miller, seems to agree in the idea that the man whose name becomes attached to every good story that has passed current for nine days was the very reverse of a fellow of infinite jest. Speaking of the " Jest Book " he says, " the man whose name was affixed to the venture without his consent or knowledge " — Joe Miller died a year before the book was published ! — " and whose personal capabilities in the joking way were below zero, remains a household word from century to century, like the super- scription over a venerable house of business of partners who have been dead and buried these hundred years, and survive above the door and on the billheads from considera- tions of expediency." Once more, this view cannot be reconciled with the contemporary evidence. On the other hand, if we accept the opinion that " the lively comic actor " was the appreciator, and probably the raconteur, possibly even the utterer himself of witticisms, it does not follow that the collection made by " Elijah Jenkins " had any more connexion with him than that of suppljdng posthumously a name which should be of 64 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS advertising value in 1739 as that of a " natural spirited comedian " who had passed away the year before, and whose name was fresh in men's memories. Ill Let us turn from the vexed question of responsibility to the little book itself which John Mottley gave to the world as Elijah Jenkins, and fathered upon Joe Miller ; the book which, according to Mr Hazlitt, marks " an English Hegira," " the beginning of witty modernity " — beside which " the older collections are archaeological and pre- historic." It is a thin volume of seventy pages, containing jests and anecdotes to the number of two hundred and forty-seven. These jests are greatly varied in kind and quality, and range from the baldest puns to real wit, and include many stories of a character better suited to the early eighteenth century than to the twentieth. Here are the first two entries in the famous collection : " I. The Duke of A — U, who says more good Things than any Body, being behind the Scenes the First Night of the 'Beggar's Opera,' and meeting Cibber there, 'Well, Gibber,' said he, ' how d'you like the " Beggar's Opera " 7 ' ' Why, it makes one laugh, my Lord,' answered he, ' on the Stage ; but how wUl it do in print ? ' ' O ! very well, I'll answer for it,' said the Duke, ' if you don't write a Preface to it.' " " 2. There being a very great Disturbance one Evening at Drury Lane Play-House, Mr WUks, coming upon the Stage to say something to pacify the Audience, had an Orange thrown full at him, which he having took up, making a low Bow, ' This is no Civil Orange, I think,' said he." JOE MILLER 65 With the third jest Joe Miller himself is brought upon the scene, and represented as but an indifferent joker : " Joe Miller sitting one Day in the Window at the Sun- Tavern in Clare Street, a Fish Woman and her Maid passing by, the Woman cry'd, ' Buy my Soals ; buy my Maid's.' ' Ah, you wicked old Creature,' cry'd honest Joe, ' What are you not content to sell your own Soul, but you must sell your Maid's too ? ' " Another story told of Joe Miller will not bear repetition, while in another he is merely mentioned as being in the company of the chronicler on a certain occasion. Those three references are all that we have of the actor's con- nexion with the series of stories associated with his name. A few of the jests may be given here as indications of the Joe Miller quality, and also as showing how — in some instances — mots ascribed to later wits are veritable " Joe MUlers." Here are three stories about one punster —the third one of the trio having been allotted to several wits of later date than Joe : " Daniel Purcel, the famous Punster, and a friend of his, having a desire to drink a glass of wine together, upon the 30th of January, they went to the Salutation Tavern upon Holbom HUl, and finding the door shut they knocked at it, but it was not opened to them, only one of the Drawers looked through a little wicket, and asked what they would please to have. ' Why, open your door,' said Daniel, ' and draw us a pint of Wine.' The Drawer said his master would not allow of it that day, it was a fast. ' Damn your master,' cried he, ' for a precise coxcomb, is he not content to fast himself, but he must make his doors fast, too ? " " The same gentleman calling for some pipes in a tavern, complained they were too short. The Drawer said, they had no other, and those were but just come in. ' Ay ! ' 66 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS said Daniel, ' I see you have not bought them very long.' " " The same gentleman as he had the character of a great punster was desired one night in company, by a gentleman, to make a pun extempore. ' Upon what subject ? ' said Daniel. ' The King,' said the other. ' The King, sir,' said he, • is no subject.' " As ready pla37ings upon the double significance of words, these examples are good. The excdlence of the third one has been so generally recognized that each successive generation has freshly allotted it to the most prominent wit of the time. It has been credited to George Colman, to Theodore Hook, to Douglas Jerrold, but I have come across no earlier appearance of the jest than this attribution to Daniel Piircell " the famous punster." We are introduced to another " famous punster " in the following somewhat simple play upon a word that has proved tempting to many. " Swan, the famous punster of Cambridge, being a non- juror, upon which account he had lost his Fellowship, as he was going along the Strand, in the beginning of King William's reign, on a very wet day, a hackney-coachman called to him, ' Sir, won't you please to take a coach ? it rains hard.' ' Ay, friend,' said he, ' but this is no reign for me to take coach in.' " A good story to which no name is attached, possibly an invention of the compilers, runs as follows : — When Oliver first coined his money, an old Cavalier looking upon one of the new pieces read the inscription. On one side was, " God with us," and on the other, " The Common- wealth of England." " I see," said he, " God and the Commonwealth are on different sides." The following is an example of the pun-simple which needs the explanation that " cole " was a cant word — a Scotticism, say the dictionaries — for money and that JOE MILLER 67 " burning " signified " roasting " or chaffing : " The late facetious Mr Spiller, being at the rehearsal, on a Saturday morning, the time when the actors are usually paid, was asking another whether Mr Wood, the treasurer of the house, had anything to say to them that morning. ' No, faith. Jemmy,' replied the other ; ' I'm afraid there's no cole.' ' Then,' said Spiller, ' if there's no cole we must burn wood.' " Neater is the pun which he gives us in the following : — In the beginning of Queen Anne's reign, three or four drunken Tories, reeling home from the Fountain Tavern in the Strand, on a Sunday morning, cried out : " We are the pillars of the Church." " No," said a Whig, that happened to be in their company, " you can be but the buttresses, for you never come on the inside of it." The following has probably done duty many times, it is one of those obvious things which the veriest tyro in the art and mystery of punning would feel shy of using : Of Dr Lloyd, Bishop of Worcester, so eminent for his prophecies, when, by his solicitations and compliance at court, he got removed from a poor Welsh bishopric to a rich English one, a reverend dean of the Church said, that he found his brother Lloyd spelt prophet with an " f." Here is a story of a notorious judge, in the days before he had earned und5nng obloquy : When the Lord Jeffreys, before he was a judge, was pleading at the bar once, a country fellow giving evidence against his client pushed the matter very home on the side he swore of. Jeffreys, after his usual way, called out to the fellow : " Hark you, you fellow in the leather doublet, what have you for swearing ? " To which the countryman smartly replied : " Faith, sir, if you have no more for lying than I have for swearing, you may go in a leather doublet too." The following, which is also in the original Joe Miller 68 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS collection, is not infrequently repeated as a new jest — I have seen it given even within the present year as a fresh story : A dog coming open-mouthed at a serjeant on the march, he ran the spear of his halbert into his throat and killed him. The owner coming out, raved extremely that his dog was killed, and asked the serjeant why he could not as well have struck at him with the blunt end of the halbert. " So I would," said he, " if he had ran at me with his tail." Here is another Joe Millerism which may be cited as an example of the humour which seems to have enjoyed some degree of popularity in the past : A learned Ser- jeant being lame of one leg, and pleading before Judge Fortescue, who had little or no nose, the Judge told him he was afraid he had but a lame cause of it. " Ob, my Lord," said the Serjeant, " have but a little patience, and I'll warrant I prove everything as plain as the nose on your face." IV Another aspect of Joe Miller may be represented in the following anecdote, which reads like a traditional folk-tale and probably had its origin long before the time of Miller : — " Three or four roguish scholars walking out one day from the University of Oxford, spied a poor fellow near Abingdon asleep in a ditch, with an ass by him, loaded with earthenware, holding the bridle in his hand. Says one of the scholars to the rest, ' If you wiH assist me, I'll help you to a little money, for you know we are bare at present.' No doubt of it they were not long consenting. ' Why, then,' said he, ' we'll go and sell this old fellow's ass at Abingdon ; for you know the fair is to-morrow, and we shall meet with chapmen enough ; therefore do you JOE MILLER 69 take the panniers off, and put them upon my back, and that bridle over my head, and then lead you the ass to market, and let me alone with the old man.' This being done accordingly, in a little time after, the poor man awaking, was strangely surprised to see his ass thus metamorphosed. ' Oh, for mercy's sake,' said the scholar, ' take this bridle out of my mouth, and this load from my back.' ' Zoons ! how came you here ? ' cried the old man. ' Why,' said he, ' my father, who is a necromancer, upon an idle thing I did to disoblige him, transformed me into an ass ; but now his heart has relented, and I am come to my own shape again, I beg you will let me go home and thank him.' ' By all means,' said the crockery merchant, ' I do not desire to have any- thing to do with conjurations,' and so set the scholar at liberty, who went directly to his comrades, that by this time were making merry with the money they had sold the ass for. But the old fellow was forced to go the next day to seek for a new one in the fair ; and after having looked on several, his own was shown him for a good one. ' What,' said he, ' have he and his father quarrelled again already? No, no ; I'll have nothing to say to him.' " CHAPTER VI A WALK DOWN FLEET STREET ' Once more, Democritus, arise on earth. With cheerful wisdom and instructive mirth. See motley life in modem trappings dressed And feed with varied fools the eternal jest.'' Samuel Johnson " T ET us take a walk down Fleet Street " is a saying J—* that most people would unhesitatingly father on Dr Johnson. But for its ascription to him, indeed, the sentence would never have had its lasting vogue, never have become one of the sayings that everybody knows. It was an ingenious invention of George Augustus Sala, but though there is no contemporary record of Johnson's having actually used the words it may safely be assumed that he did. It is easy to realize that, finding himself at tavern or coffee-house in uncongenial company, he should have said to the companion of the moment, Bennet Langton, or Burke, Goldsmith or another, or his particular limpet, James Boswell : " Come, sir, let us take a walk down Fleet Street," with the intention of attending some more attractive gathering. Though the sentence is used here it is not intended to confine the chapter to wit and humour uttered between Temple Bar and Ludgate Circus, but to make it cover the latter half of the eighteenth century, when the great Cham of letters dominated the 70 A WALK DOWN FLEET STREET 71 literary world. Another reason that may justify the use of the words in this connexion is that in the annals of wit the work of James Boswell marks an era that is perhaps in some ways more important than the publica- tion of " Joe Miller's Jests." Boswell, who might be regarded as the very prototype of Bums' " chiel amang ye takin' notes," ever on the lookout for some saying wise, witty, or bluntly rude that his great man might utter, started the gentle art of boswellizing. Since his great book was published and achieved success, men have been readier to remember and record the good things that they have heard and the task of the compiler of such becomes that of a selector rather than of a collector. In the Johnsonian era such social gatherings as afford the atmospheric conditions in which the lightning of wit plays seem to have increased. The coffee-houses were still flourishing, the clubs were becoming more firmly established as institutions and there was a return to the formal and informal gatherings at the taverns such as had marked the time of " rare Ben." II Though this chapter is written as it were under the shadow of Johnson's burly figure, the Doctor himself cannot be regarded as one of the great wits. There are many of his sayings on record but often the only surprise about them is that which we feel at their blunt- ness ; his weapon was far oftener the cudgel than the rapier. At times, however, hei could wield the finer implement, and could even turn a| witty compliment when in the right vein, as for example when Mrs Siddons called on him in Bolt Court and the serv^t did not readily bring 72 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS her a chair, Johnson said : " You see, madam, wherever you go, there are no seats to be had." A compliment the more notable in that Johnson generally professed a contempt for actors. Mrs Piozzi, indeed, declared that when Johnson had a mind to compliment anybody he did it with more dignity to himself, and better effect upon the company, than any man, instancing his remark to Mrs Montague, who had shown him some plates that had once belonged to Queen Elizabeth : " They had no reason to be ashamed of their present possessor, who was so little inferior to the first." There was more of witticism than of criticism in a happy reply of Johnson's to Goldsmith on the latter complaining of the success of Seattle's " Essay on Truth " : " here's such a stir about a fellow who has written one book, and I have written many." " Ah ! " said Johnson, " there go two and forty sixpences to one guinea you know. Doctor." The diligent Boswell did not escape some hard knocks from his friend. On one occasion the Scotsman com- plained of the noise of the company the day before, saying that it had made his head ache. " No, sir," said Johnson, " it was not the noise that made your head ache ; it was the sense we put into it." " Has sense that effect on the head ? " Boswell asked, with inconceivable naivete, to have the inevitable answer thundered at him : " Yes, sir, on heads not used to it." Again Boswell ventured to ask if Johnson did not consider that a good cook was more essential to the community than a good poet, to receive the prompt reply : " I don't suppose there's a dog in the town but thinks so." There was criticism as well as wit in his reply to a request for his opinion of the pompous title of an insignificant volimie "that it was similar to placing an eight-and- forty pounder at the door of a pigsty." A WALK DOWN FLEET STREET 73 A pretentious person, seeking to ingratiate himself in Johnson's favour, took the foolish course of laughing immoderately at everything that he said. The Doctor bore it for some time, but at length finding the impertinent guffaw intolerable broke out with : " Pray, sir, what is the matter ? I hope I have not said anything which you can comprehend." To a dyspeptic friend, overfond of discussing his own health, and enlarging upon his symptoms, Johnson offered the snub direct in " Do not be like the spider, man, and spin conversation thus incessantly out of your own bowels." There was similar wit in his retort on Garrick when the actor, referring to Johnson's well-known dislike of the Whigs, asked him : " Why did you not make me a Tory when we lived so much together ? You love to make people Tories." " Why," asked Johnson, in an effective reply by interrogation, as he pulled a number of half- pennies out of his pocket, " Why did not the King make these guineas ? " There was stinging double-barbed wit in his remark : " My Lord Chesterfield may be a wit among lords, but I fancy he is no more than a lord among wits." It is, I fancy, to Johnson that we may trace the fashion of making Scotland and the Scotch a butt at which to fire the shafts of wit. WTaether Johnson was moved to it by the train of Scots that came south on the rise of Bute to power, or whether he began it by way of playing upon Boswell it would not be easy to decide. The habit, as habits will, grew upon him and many are the amusing exaggerations, now witty, now humorous, inspired by the theme. When someone mentioned that some Scots had taken possession of a barren part of North America, and expressed surprise that they should have chosen it, " Why, sir," said Johnson, " all barrenness is comparative. The 74 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS Scots would not know it to be barren." And again when he and Boswell were at Bristol, says the latter : " We were by no means pleased with our inn. ' Let us see now,' said I, 'how we should describe.it.' 'Describe it, sir? Why, it was so bad that — Boswell wished to be in Scotland.' " After Boswell had taken Johnson on his personally conducted tour in the north he had the temerity to say : " You have now been in Scotland, sir, and say if you did not see meat and drink enough there." " Why, yes, sir," retorted Johnson, "meat and driak enough to give the inhabitants sufficient strength to run away." He had said something of a similar nature on first meeting with Boswell. The self-important young Scot said : " I find that I am come to London at a bad time, when great popular prejudice has gone forth against us North Britons ; but when I am talking to you I am talking to a large and liberal mind, and you know that I cannot help coming from Scotland." " Sir," said Johnson, " neither can the rest of your countrymen." Then, too, when another Scot in a gathering at the Mitre was defending his country against Johnsonian gibes, insisting that Scotland had a great many noble wild prospects, Johnson retorted : " I believe, sir, you have a great many. Norway, too, has noble wild prospects ; and Lapland is remarkable for prodigious noble wild prospects. But, sir, let me tell you, the noblest prospect which a Scotsman ever sees is the highroad which leads him to England." There must have been a spirit of mischief in Johnson which made him harp upon this theme, though it was the very pertinacity of the Scots in trying to make him say something complimentary of their country whichfgave him his|opportunity again and again for further" hits. After his return from his tour in the north he was for A WALK DOWN FLEET STREET 75 instance asked by a Scot if he had not acquired a better opinion of Scotland. What did he now think of it ? " That it is a very vile country to be stire," answered the Doctor. " Well, sir," retorted the nettled Scot, " God made it ! " " Certainly He did," came the instant acknowledgment ; " but we must always remember that He made it for Scotsmen and — comparisons are odious, but God made Hell ! " In a volume of miscellaneous anecdotes published in 1789, five years after Johnson's death, a story is given which shows that even the great Cham at times found a wit able to score off him. The story is given as related by Dr Rutherford — ^who receives no mention as one of Johnson's companions in Boswell's book. " It was an aimual custom with Dr Johnson's bookseller (whose name I have forgot) to invite his authors to dine with him ; and it was upon this occasion that Dr Johnson and Dr Rose of Chiswick met, when the following dispute happened between them on the pre-eminency of the Scotch and English writers. In the course of conversation Dr Warburton's name was mentioned, when Dr Rose observed what a proud imperious person he was. Dr Johnson answered, ' Sir, so he was ; but he possessed more learning than has been imported from Scotland since the days of Buchanan.' Dr Rose, after enumerating a great many Scotch authors (which Johnson treated with contempt), said, ' What think you of David Hume, sir ? ' ' Ha ! a deistical, scribbling fellow.' Rose : ' WeU, be it so ; but what say you to Lord Bute ? ' Johnson (with a surly wow, wow) : "I did not know that he ever wrote anything.' Rose : ' No ! I think that he has written one line that has outdone anything that Shakespeare, or Milton, or anyone else ever wrote.' Johnson : ' Pray, what was that, sir ? ' Rose : ' It was 76 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS when he wrote an order for your pension, sir.' Johnson, quite confounded, replied, ' Why, that was a very fine line, to be sure, sir.' " Upon which the contemporary chronicler declares the rest of the company got up and laughed and hallooed, till the whole room was in a roar. On another occasion it was Macklin who scored off Johnson. They were discussing some literary subject when the latter quoted a Greek passage. "I do not understand Greek," said the actor. " A man who argues should understand every language, ' ' said Johnson. " Very well," said Macklin, and at once gave a quotation in Irish. A slender butcher well known for his pretension to taste which he did not possess took up a volume of Churchill's poems in a bookseller's shop and reading out the line " Who rules o'er freemen should himself be free," then turned to Dr Johnson, who was standing by, and said, " What think you of that, sir ? " " Rank nonsense ! " bluntly replied Johnson ; "it is an assertion without a proof. You might as well say ' Who drives fat oxen, should himself be fat.' " Not many of the recorded witticisms bear out the description of them given by Edmund Burke. Someone had observed that Johnson's jokes were the rebukes of the righteous, described in the Scriptures as being like excellent oil. " Yes," said Burke, " oil of vitriol ! " III Lord Chesterfield — whom Johnson, as we have seen, dubbed a wit among lords and but a lord among wits — is credited with a number of happy retorts. It is true that Malone declares that his lordship's bon-mots were all carefully studied and apparently husbanded with care so A WALK DOWN FLEET STREET ^^ that his listeners should not have to complain of having too much of a good thing. " Dr Warren, who attended him for some months before his death," said Malone, " told me that he had always one ready for him on each visit, but never gave him a second one the same day." The doctor did not apparently make a note of his patient's daily mots, which is a pity as, during an attendance of some months, they would have formed a goodly budget. Several of Chesterfield's sayings are, however, available showing that while he was master of quiet sarcasm he did not disdain to use the lowly pun — the pun-obvious as it might almost be termed in the following example. When it was being debated whether the piers of Westminster bridge should be of stone or wood, Chesterfield is reported to have said : "Of stone to be sure, for we have too many wooden peers at Westminster already." Which suggests that about 1750 Lord Chesterfield had recognized that the House of Lords was, to put it euphemistically, capable of improvement. When one of the Spiritual Peers was commending Dryden's translation of Virgil, Lord Chesterfield expressed but qualified agreement, adding, " the original is indeed excellent, but everything suffers by translation — except a bishop ! " On learning of the marriage of a well- known termagant with a notorious gamester he quietly remarked that cards and brimstone made the best matches. It is only fitting that the man whose name is immortally linked with advice — set forth in his famous letters — should himself have been a restrained unexcitable person such as we get indicated in his reply to an agitated official who came rushing into his room exclaiming, " My lord, they're rising in Connaught." " Well, sir," said Chester- field coolly, looking at his watch, " it's nine o'clock, and they ought to be." 78 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS Chesterfield having proposed someone as a fitting person to occupy a place of great trust that had fallen vacant found that the King wished to appoint someone else. The Council however resolved not to accept his Majesty's choice and it became the duty of Chesterfield to present the grant of the office for signature. Not to notify this too abruptly he diplomatically begged to know with whose name the King would be pleased to have the blanks filled. " With the Devil's," said his Majesty, in a rage. " And," said the Earl imperturbably, " shall the instrument run as usual — Our trusty and well-beloved cousin and counsellor ? ' ' The King is said to have laughed heartily at the courtier's wit, and at once gave way. " Long " Sir Thomas Robinson, nicknamed thus to distinguish him from another baronet of the same name, having asked Chesterfield for some verses, immediately received the following neat epigram : — " Unlike my subject now shall be my song ; It shall be witty and it sha'n't be long."- When Chesterfield called upon the Duke of Newcastle the Earl was asked to take a seat in an ante-room as his Grace was engaged. The only book at hand was " Garnet upon Job," a volume dedicated to the Duke. On entering the room Newcastle found his visitor so busy reading that he asked him what he thought of the work. " In any other place I should not think much of it," replied Chesterfield ; " but there is so much propriety in putting a volume upon patience in the room where every visitor has to wait for your Grace, that here it must be considered one of the best books in the world." Colley Cibber had expressed a wish that he might be succeeded as Poet Laureate by Henry Jones, a bricklayer, who as poet and dramatist gained the patronage of Lord A WALK DOWN FLEET STREET 79 Chesterfield. Walpole hearing him mentioned as possible successor to the Laureateship asked as to his qualifications, and Chesterfield replied that a better poet would not take the post — and a worse ought not to have it. Johnson's sneer at Lord Chesterfield's capacity for wit is justified rather by its own wit and its utterer's pique than by the fact. IV A pun according to one version of the inception of Gold- smith's " Retaliation " was indirectly responsible for the addition of a delightful satire to our literature. For Cumberland teUs us that Oliver Goldsmith putting in a belated appearance at a gathering at the St James's Coffee- house was haUed by someone — ^how many punsters have echoed the conceit ! — as " the late Dr Goldsmith." From this came the suggestion of writing the poet's epitaph, and Garrick's impromptu contribution to the series : " Here lies Nolly Goldsmith, for shortness call'd Noll, Who wrote like an angel, and talk'd like Poor Poll ! " Tellingly did Goldsmith retaliate with his poem a few days later. He was greater as a literary than as a conver- sational wit, though it may be that the shy self-conscious- ness of the poet was such that he reserved for his pen things that he had not the sang-froid to say with his tongue. Still there are not wanting some evidences that he took his part in the give-and-take of talk. " Who is this Scots cur at Johnson's heels ? " asked someone, surprised at the Doctor's sudden intimacy with Boswell. " He is not a cur," said Goldsmith, " you are too severe. He is only a bur. Tom Davies flung him at Johnson in sport, and he has the faculty for sticking." 8o A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS A story of Goldsmith's readiness as a boy has been repeated many times and in varied forms. Here it may be given as it finds its place in Forster's biography of him. There was company one day to a little dance, and the fiddler who happened to be engaged on the occasion, being a fiddler who reckoned himself a wit, received suddenly an Oliver for his Roland for which he had not come prepared. During a pause between two country dances the party had been greatly surprised by little Noll quickly jumping up and dancing a fas seul impromptu about the room, where- upon, seizing the opporttmity of the lad's ungainly look and grotesque figure, the jocose fiddler promptly exclaimed " ^sop ! " A burst of laughter rewarded him, which, however, was rapidly turned the other way by NoU stop- ping his hornpipe, looking round at his assailant, and giving forth in audible voice and without hesitation the couplet which was thought worth preserving as the first formal effort of his genius by Percy, Malone, Campbell, and the rest who compiled the biographical preface to the " Mis- cellaneous Works " on which the subsequent biographies have been founded, but who nevertheless appear to have missed the correct version of what they thought so clever — " Heralds, proclaim aloud ! all saying, See iEsop dancing — and his Monkey playing ! " Samuel Parr, who is better remembered as a pedagogue than as a clergyman, had a shrewd tongue. Sir Leslie Stephen summed him up as having " Johnson's pomposity without his force of mind, Johnson's love of antithesis without his logical acuteness, and Johnson's roughness without his humour," but added that his personal remarks A WALK DOWN FLEET STREET 8i were pointed though laboured. In many of them the point is assuredly more obvious that the labour. As, for example, when a young clergyman whom he had called a fool said that he should complain to the Bishop. " Do so, by all means," said Parr, " and my Lord Bishop will confirm you." Pointed, also, was his reply to a man who had observed that he would not believe anything that he could not understand, " Then, young man, your creed wiU be the shortest of any man's I know." To an antagonist of whom he had but a poor opinion, however, he used the bludgeon rather than the rapier : " You have read a great deal, you have thought very little, and you know nothing." The cumulative manner of the last saying was used by Parr more effectively of James O'Quigley who had been executed for high treason : " He was an Irishman — and he might have been a Scotsman ; he was priest — and he might have been a lawyer ; he was a rebel — and he might have been an apostate." The saying is the more pointed when it is known that it was addressed to Sir James Mackintosh, a Scotchman and a lawyer. Another story associating Parr with Mackintosh is of the knight taking Parr for a drive when the horse became restive and the scholar became nervous. " Gently, Jemmy," said Parr, " don't irritate him ; always soothe your horse, Jemmy. You'll do better without me. Let me down. Jemmy." The horse was stopped enough for the purpose, and no sooner had Parr safely descended than his advice changed, " Now, Jemmy, touch him up. Never let a horse get the better of you. Touch him up, conquer him, don't spare him. And now I'll leave you to manage him — I'll walk home." One of those boring people who will discuss their health had been enlarging upon various sjnnptoms, and came to a 82 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS pause after sajring that he could not go out without catch- ing a cold in the head. " No wonder," commented Parr ; " you always go out without anything in it." Dining at a friend's, Parr met a Mr Cumberland who spoke disparagingly of Dr Priestly. The next day Parr met another friend and exclaimed indignantly : " Only think of Mr Cumberland that he should have presumed to talk before me — before me, sir — in such terms of my friend Priestly ! Pray, sir, let Mr DUly know my opinion of Mr Cumberland — ^that his ignorance is equalled only by his impertinence, and that both are exceeded by his malice." In a clerical company the conversation had turned upon the then head of the Church. Dr Parr having listened for some time to the strictures of his companions called in apt alliteration's artful aid and broke in with : " Sir, he is a poor paltry prelate, proud of petty popularity, and perpetually preaching to petticoats." Dr Parr was very fond of whist, and very impatient of any want of skill on the part of those with whom he was playing. Taking a hand with three poor players he was asked by a friend how he was getting on and replied with cutting sarcasm, " Pretty well, considering that I have three adversaries." VI Several good things are recorded of some of the lesser men of the Johnsonian time. One of these, Topham Beauclerk, in a retort on Goldsmith utUized a jest which is as old as the Greek anthology where it is written. " Pheidon nor dosed nor touched me ; but, being ill of a fever, I remembered his name, and died." Oliver Gold- smith, in his capacity of doctor, attended a lady of his acquaintance and his opinion differed from that of the A WALK DOWN FLEET STREET 83 apothecary already in attendance. The patient preferred the advice of the apothecary, and Goldsmith went off in dudgeon. He would leave off prescribing for his friends. " Do so, my dear Doctor," said Beauclerk ; " whenever you undertake to kill let it be only your enemies." On another occasion Topham Beauclerk and Boswell had a passEige-at-arms. " Now that gentleman," averred the Scot, " against whom you are so violent is, I know, a man of good principles." " Then he does not wear them out in practice," retorted Beauclerk. Edward Young, the author of the widely known but probably little read " Night Thoughts," would be thought of but by few as deserving of a place among the wits, yet the following story shows him to have had a happy readiness : As the poet was walking in his garden at Welwyn, in company with two ladies, one of whom he afterwards married, the servant came to tell him that a gentleman wished to speak with him. " Tell him," said Young, " I am too happily engaged to change my situa- tion." The ladies insisted that he should go, as his visitor was a man of rank, his patron and his friend. As persua- sion however had no effect, one took him by the right arm, the other by the left, and led him to the garden gate ; when, finding resistaiice was in vain, he bowed, laid his hand upon his heart, and in that expressive manner for which he was so remarkable spoke the following lines : — " Thus Adam looked when from the Garden driven, And thus disputed orders sent from Heaven. Like him, I go ; but yet to go am loth ; Like him I go, for angels drive us both : Hard was his fate ; but mine stUl more unkind ; His Eve went with him ; but mine stay behind."- The King's Head in Pall Mall was the meeting-place of a club known as the World, and at one of the gatherings it 84 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS was proposed that those present should write epigrams on the glasses. Young begged to be excused as he had no diamond, but on Lord Stanhope promptly offering to lend his the poet took it and wrote : " Accept a miracle instead of wit — See two dull lines with Stanhope's pencil writ." By so doing Young apparently outdid aU the diamond owners, for his is the only one of the epigrams — a perfect example of wit in compliment — that has come down to us. There is a story told of Chatterton which suggests that the " marvellous boy " had in him not only the genius of a poet but the instinct for wit. An old gentleman who had met the youth more than once at the Cyder Cellars had a fancy to play the part of patron cheaply, and invited the young poet to his house to dinner. After the meal some very indifferent wine was put on the table. This, as he filled Chatterton's glass that they might drink to the memory of Shakespeare, he praised extravagantly. The toast was honoured, and tears stood in the poet's eyes. " God bless me ! " said the old gentleman, " you are in tears, Mr Chatterton." " Yes, sir," responded the poet, " this dead wine of yours compels me to shed tears, but by heaven ! they are not the tears of veneration." CHAPTER VII WIT AND HUMOUR OF THE THEATRES -- What they have they give." Churchill IT has been said by Mr Carew Hazlitt that if the sayings reported of or by actors and authors were subtracted from the grand total of our jests, the residuum would assuredly display a very deplorable shrinkage. Roughly speaking the two professions indicated are responsible for half the witticisms recorded. It may be that the very business in which the energies of actors and authors are mostly engaged is responsible for this result ; both are concerned with the arrangement of words — ^their own or others — and thus are more likely to have the facility fostered for clothing their thought with instantly appro- priate language. It has been said that every man has it in him to tell one story, and so it may be said that everybody has it in him to utter one individual jest. In some the capacity seems early atrophied, in others occasion is kindly and the first successfiil exercise of wit leads to further trials until the faculty is not only strengthened, but comes to work with the readiness of instinct — and the utterer of the witticism scarcely appreciates the point he has made before he has fired it. " Sow an act and you reap a habit, sow a habit and you reap a character," says a philosopher, and 85 86 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS the truth applies in the world of wit no less than in that of morals. In this we may perhaps recognize the operative cause of so much of our anecdotal accumulation centring in the stage. The theatre forms just such a social atmos- phere as should foster the production of wit and humour, and it is there that we find, since the middle of the eigh- teenth century more especially, the interplay of wits giving birth to wit. A goodly volume of theatrical anecdotes and mots might readily be compiled — indeed such a collection was made more than a century ago— but here I can only give representative witticisms connected with the stage. George Meredith has said that a capacity for laughter is a promise of wit to come in a people, and as in their profession actors are accustomed to that part of our litera- ture in which wit in a large measure finds its literary expression, so it may be believed they come to exercise that perception wihch produces fresh wit. There is scarcely an actor of note of whom some stories are not current. This is not to say that there are no such people as dull actors, or that every actor is a wit who should be accompanied by a boswellizing friend; it is merely an attempt to indicate the reason for the truth stated at the beginning of this chapter. Wit needs company for its inception no less surely than for its expression and appre- ciation, and the conditions of theatrical life seem peculiarly beneficial to its development. II It is not as I have suggested intended to attempt any complete collection of witticisms uttered by actors and other habitues of the theatre, but only to present some WIT AND HUMOUR OF THE THEATRES 87 representative mots chiefly from the time of Garrick onwards. To Joe Miller himself we owe the preservation of a neat saying of CoUey Gibber, who, as Joe not too kindly put it, " notwithstanding his odes, has now and then said a good thing." The notorious Duke of Wharton said indignantly to the actor that he fully expected to see him hanged or beggared very soon. " If I had your Grace's politics or morals," said the actor-dramatist Poet Laureate, " you might expect both." Another theatrical story preserved in the Miller collection is told as follows, with that syncopizing of names which does not disguise them, and may be here altered : The Lord North and Grey, being once at the Theatre Royal in the Ha5miarket, was pleased to tell Mr Heidegger, he would make him a present of one hundred pounds if he could produce an uglier face than his, the said Heidegger's, within a year and a day. Mr Heidegger went instantly and fetched a looking-glass, and presented it to his Lordship saying, he did not doubt his Lordship had honour enough to keep his promise ! That Garrick himself had a shrewd tongue there are several tales to testify. When he and Quin were perform- ing at the same theatre and in the same play they left the theatre together. It was a dark and stormy night and each ordered a chair. To the annoyance of Quin, Garrick's chair arrived first. " Let me get into the chair," he said, " and put little Davy in the lantern." " By all means," retorted Garrick " I shall ever be happy to enlighten Mr Quin in anything." Quin so often scored off others that this may be regarded as a hit, a palpable hit. Garrick is also reported as having neatly turned the tables more than once on the author of " Tristram Shandy." Sterne, who could scarcely be regarded as a pattern of conjugal behaviour, 88 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS was one day uttering fine sentiments on marital love and fidelity. " The husband," said he, " who behaves unkindly to his wife deserves to have his house bunft over his head." " If you think so," said Garrick, " I hope that your house is insured \" On another occasion Sterne — of all people ! — said that those authors whose works are marked by indelicate allusions ought, as a warn- ing to others, to be hanged up before their own houses. " It is well for you," dryly returned the actor, " if such is to be the law, that you live in lodgings." John Palmer, a popular Dnnry Lane actor, was the son of a man who had been a theatrical billsticker. When he became successful it was noticed that he was very fond of wearing a great display of jewels. This being commented on, " Ah ! " said Garrick " I can remember the time when he carried nothing but paste." Garrick was regarded, and probably with reason, as being near to the point of penuriousness, but he had a sense of humour which allowed him to jest at his own failing. A doctor, accustomed to high fees, had been attending the actor for some time and even from this close-fisted patient secured two guineas a visit. Garrick began to grudge this sum and at length decided to halve it and on the termina- tion of a visit handed the doctor the fee which he had resolved was sufficient. The physician began looking about him as though in search of something. Garrick inquired if he had lost anything. " Sir," replied the doctor, " I believe I have dropped a guinea." " No, doctor," said the actor, with quiet significance, "it is I that have dropped a guinea." When Garrick and a friend were walking in the country they noticed on a house the inscription : " A goes koored hear ! " " How is it possible," said the friend, " that people such as these can cure agues ? " "I do not know WIT AND HUMOUR OF THE THEATRES 89 what their prescription is," replied the actor, " but it is not by a spell." The story is similar to that of Hook and a friend who saw over a country alehouse : " Bear sold here." Hook paused, drew his friend's attention to the words and added : " Evidently their own bruin ! " Of nearly every man of whom stories are told in illustra- tion of a readiness to say sharp or amusing things there is to be found recorded a case in which he was the victim of retaliatory wit. That Garrick is no exception to the rule is shown by the following, which I find in an old-time collection of ana : — David Garrick was once on a visit at Mr Rigby's seat, Mistley HaU, Essex, when Dr Gough formed one of the party. Observing the potent appetite of the learned dotcor, Garrick indulged in some coarse jests on the occasion, to the great amusement of those present, the doctor excepted ; who, when the laugh had subsided, thus addressed the company : " Gentlemen, you must doubtless suppose from the extreme familiarity with which Mr Garrick has thought fit to treat me, that I am an acquaintance of his ; but I can assure you that, till I met him here, I never saw him but once before — and then I paid five shillings for the sight." Ill That Mrs Siddons — the Muse of Tragedy — could on occasion borrow the style of Melpomene's sister Thalia is shown by one or two spirited answers, as for example when hearing someone remark that applause was necessary to actors, to give them confidence, she added : " More, it gives us breath." The father of the actress had always forbidden her to marry an actor, yet she secretly wedded a member of the old gentleman's company. Roger Kemble was 90 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS furious. " Have I not," he thundered, " dared you to marry an actor ? " The daughter replied that she had not disobeyed. " What, madam, have you not allied yourself to the worst performer in ray company ? " " Exactly," she answered, " nobody can call him an actor." Another member of the same family made his first appearance on the operatic stage. His voice however was so bad that the conductor of the orchestra called out to him at rehearsal : " Mr Kemble, Mr Kemble, you are murdering the music." " My dear sir," came the quiet retort, " it is far better to murder it outright than to keep on beating it as you do." Mrs Abington, an actress whom Horace Walpole regarded as superior to Garrick, and by whom Johnson was pleased to be noticed, is said to have been renowned for her wit, though I have found but one anecdote by way of evidence. Stopping at an inn on the Chester road she found that someone had scratched the sentimental words, " Lord M — has the softest lips in the universe, Phillis." At once she scratched beneath it : " Then as like as two chips Are his head and his lips. Amarillis." When the veteran Macklin was rehearsing Macbeth — which he performed, for the first time since the Restoration, in Scotch costume — he detained the players unusually long at the theatre owing to his want of memory. After the rehearsal was over one of them asked Ned Shuter if he did not think it remarkable that a man so old — Macklin was about seventy-five — should attempt such a character. Shuter replied dryly by lines from the play itself : " The time has been That when the brains were out the man would die. And there an end ; but now '•' Nearly twenty years before that performance Macklin WIT AND HUMOUR OF THE THEATRES 91 had taken a farewell benefit on quitting the stage ; nearly seventeen years after it, at the age of ninety-two, he appeared, really for the last time, as Shylock, but only got through a few lines of his part. It is said that on that final benefit, seeing the actress who was cast for the chief r81e he asked if she was playing, and she answered that she was dressed for Portia. " Ah, very true," said the old man; " but who is to play Shylock ? " Macklin seems more often to have been the butt of other wits than a wit himself, though one story told of him suggests that he possessed a sarcastic humour. He was seated with a friend at the theatre when someone in front of them kept standing up and obscuring their view of the stage. Macklin touched him gently on the arm, and with much seeming civility requested that when he saw or heard anj^hing that was entertaining on the stage to let him and the gentleman with him know of it, "as at present we must totally depend on yotir kindness." The sarcasm, it is said, had the desired effect. Macklin's method might be recommended to those who find their views eclipsed by the headgear monstrosities, often bird-bedecked barbarities, which give point to Mere- dith's statement that woman will be the last thing civilized by man. That Nen Shuter, whose application of the lines from Macbeth to Macklin was cruel wit, was gifted also with humour is seen in his ingenious apology for holes in his stockings — " a hole may be the accident of a day, and will pass upon the best gentleman, but a darn is premeditated poverty." If the pun is the lowest form of wit, the practical joke may be described even more assuredly as the lowest form of humour, but we may include in this theatrical chapter an anecdote that is told of the thriftless and shiftless Theophilus Gibber, son of the better-known Colley. In 92 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS company with three boon companions, Cibber made an excursion into the country. He had a false set of teeth, one of the friends had a glass eye, another had a cork leg, while the fourth member of the party had a trick of shaking his head. They travelled in a post-coach, and while at the first stage, after each had made merry over his neighbour's infirmity, they agreed that at every halting-place they would ail affect the same singularity. When they stopped for breakfast they were all to squint, and as the countrymen stood gaping round when they alighted — " Od rot it ! " cried one, " how that man squints ! " " Why, dom thee," said a second, " here be another squinting fellow ! " The third was thought to be a better squinter than the other two, and the fourth better than all the rest. At dinner all appeared to have artificial legs, and their stumping about made more diversion than they had done at breakfast. At tea they were all stone deaf ; but at supper, which was at the Ship at Dover, each man resumed his own character the better to play his part in the farce they had arranged. When they were ready to go to bed Cibber called out to the waiter : " Here, fellow, take out my teeth." " Teeth, sir," said the man. " Ay, teeth, sir, unscrew that wire and they'll all come out together." After some hesitation the man did as he was ordered. This was no sooner per- formed than another of the quartet called out: " Here, you, take out my eye ! " " Lord, sir," said the waiter, " your eye ! " " Yes, my eye ; come here, you stupid fellow, pull up that eyelid and it will come out as easy as possible." This done the third called out : " Here, you rascal, take off my leg." This was done with less reluctance, the waiter having already noticed that it was of cork, and believing that it would be the last job. He was, however, mistaken ; the fourth of the party was waiting for his opportunity, and when the waiter was looking at the teeth, the eye, and the WIT AND HUMOUR OF THE THEATRES 93 leg laid on the table, cried out in a solemn voice : " Come here, sir, and take off my head ! " Turning round and seeing the speaker's head shaking as though it was loose, the waiter darted out of the room and went headlong down the stairs, declaring that the gentlemen in the room above were all certainly devils. IV When we reach the nineteenth century, with its vast increase of newspapers, its growing habit of recording things said and done in biographies, reminiscences, recol- lections and memoirs, and also with its further progress of the actor from the ranks of the vagabonds to those of the titled gentry, we find a great body of theatrical ana. And always, from Barrister and Colman to Mathews, from Mathews to Toole, there is some dominant humorist whose sayings are specially remembered and repeated, a humorist who, responsible for many good things, is sometimes credited with those of other men whose names are less familiar, and who has at times veritable " Joe Millers " attached to him by chroniclers who either do not know or wish to give an ancient jest fresh currency by newly stamp- ing it. John Poole, the author of " Paul Pry," made happy punning use of the name of an actor. Priest, who was play- ing at one of the principal theatres. A fellow-clubman having expressed surprise at there being so many men in the pit, " Oh," said Poole, " they ajre probably clerks who have taken Priest's orders." Of Charles Mathews many stories are told. He went to Wakefield at a time of commercial depression. It was to no pm-pose that his well-known entertaiimient was advertised, the audience was ever scanty. Moving on to 94 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS Edinburgh he was asked by a friend if he had not done well in Wakefield. He replied that he had not made a shilling. " Not a shilling ! " echoed the other, " why, did you not go there to star ? " " Yes," said Mathews significantly, " but they spell it with z.vem Wakefield." When asked what profession his son was designed to follow, Mathews said : " Oh, he is going to draw houses — like his father." Meaning, however, that he was to be an architect, not an actor. Another of his puns is recorded in an account of his sitting on a coach on a frosty morning waiting for the driver, and saying when that worthy at last appeared : " If you stand here much longer, Mr Coachman, your horses wUl be like Captain Parry's ships." " How's that, sir ? " inquired Jehu. " Why, frozen at the pole." Another story recorded of Mathews' illustrates the ruling passion strong in death, though it must be added the same story is sometimes told of Sydney Smith, sometimes of Thomas Hood ; it is said that during his last illness the attendant gave him by mistake some ink instead of medi- cine, and discovering his error just too late said : " Good heavens ! I've given you the ink ! " " Never mind, my boy, never mind," came the quiet answer, " I'll swallow a bit of blotting paper." The following green-room conversation is said to have taken place on the announcement of the marriage of Madame Vestris with Charles Mathews : " They say," said Mrs Humby, with her air of assumed simplicity, " that before accepting him Vestris made a full confession to him of all her lovers ! What touching confidence ! " she added archly. " What needless trouble ! " said Mrs Orger dryly. " What a wonderful memory ! " wound up Mrs Glover triumphantly. WIT AND HUMOUR OF THE THEATRES 95 The latest actor to be associated with innumerable anecdotes was John Laurence Toole, an inimitable come- dian, the hero of many practical jokes and the utterer of numerous amusing and whimsical things. The fun of the thing lay so much in his capacity for acting his jokes that they probably lose much of their savour in mere narration. He was travelling once in a slow train, and a prolonged stay being made at a certain station Toole quietly asked a porter to summon the stationmaster. That official hurried to the carriage where Toole sat as solemn as a judge, " What is it, sir ? " inquired the stationmaster. " At what time is the funeral to take place ? " inquired the actor. " Funeral, sir ! Whose funeral ? " came the be- wildered question. " Whose funeral ? " echoed Toole, pointing to the name of the station, " why, have we not come to Bury St Edmunds ? " When he had been appearing in what is now known as a triple bUl, Toole was told by a friend that it was a curious thing, but he was never cut up by the press. " Never cut up ! " said he, " why I often appear in three pieces." Making a speech to a gathering of artists at Glasgow, he suggested that " the best thing that an artist could do to improve his taste was — to clean his palette ! " Discussing what he regarded as the quackery of the memory- teaching business, Toole suggested as an admirable illustration of the effect of a course of mnemonics the case of a man who paid a couple of guineas for lessons, and at the end of them returned to the place where he had received them, rang the bell, and on being asked what he wanted, said : " I have forgotten my umbrella." That Toole was a humorist rather than a wit most of 96 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS the stories told of him go to show, and he was a humorist with just such a taste for the exaggerated humour of the elaborate practical joke as that of Theodore Hook. The following characteristic instance of his love for solemn fooling may be quoted from the entertaining " Reminis- cences of J. L. Toole, related by himself, and chronicled by Joseph Hatton." The scene was York station. " We had bought aU the newspapers, and tipped all the porters. Our carriage door was locked. We were to have no companions. Every moment we were expecting the train to start, and every moment it did nothing of the kind. ' Satan finds some mischief still for idle hands to do.' We made several inquiries about the delay of the train ; it was quite a remarkable delay ; it lasted nearly half-an-hour. At last Toole, always bent on amusing me or studying character, said we must ' do something.' They were painting the railway station, and doing the work with much elegance of design and detail. The company is proud of its station at York, as well it might be, and they had evidently resolved that the art spirit of the age shotdd not be neglected in its decoration. The pillars supporting the magnificent roof were of a greyish tint of light blue, with a band of magenta at the base, and here and there at given points of the pillars themselves a similar band breaking into light filigree ornamentation. The armorial bearings of the company were emblazoned on pillars and columns, and altogether the work was of a very artistic character. A painter with a small brush, almost like a camel-hair pencil, was finishing the more delicate details of the most important of the decorations ; he was earnestly engaged upon a piece of foliated work that ran round one of the pillars. " Toole called a boy, gave him some coppers, requested him to jog the painter's elbow and ask him — ^referring to WIT AND HUMOUR OF THE THEATRES 97 the decorative scroll — ' if he was going to tip it with green.' " We were too far away, of course, to hear anything, but we could see the painter offering some kind of explanation to the boy, the boy pointing to our carriage. " The boy returned, and said the painter had ' no orders to tip it with green.' " Thereupon Toole appealed to the guard, who was an exceptionally anxious-looking person. " ' It is always a difficult thing,' Toole said to him, with a grave face, ' to make alterations when you settle the colour of a particular style of decoration ; but the directors have come to the conclusion that the scrollwork round the pillars is too plain — ^wants variety ; and they have decided to have it tipped with green. I wish you would tell the painter there to tip it with green.' " ' Well,' said the guard, ' I've no time to spare, sir, but I'll just speak to the stationmaster.' Before Toole could interpose, the guard rushed to the other end of the platform and sent the stationmaster, a courteous and imposing- looking official, to our carriage. " I was beginning to laugh, and to wonder how my friend would get out of this unexpected difficulty. " ' Keep your countenance,' he said, ' it's all right.' " The statioimiaster came up. " ' Oh, about the painting of the station ? ' said Toole. " ' Yes, sir ; what is it ? ' " ' Well, we had a meeting yesterday, and we think it would be wise to relieve the decoration with a little green. You see it's rather monotonous, that blue and magenta ; and although the contract has been given out, and actually begun, we reconsidered it yesterday on good advice — I was speaking to the inspector — and we have had a good deal g8 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS of — of — of talk about it. A little thing makes such a difference, doesn't it ? ' " ' Well, it does,' said the stationmaster. " ' And we thought that if a little orange or green were introduced into the filigree work on the pillars — it would be an improvement. Of course you can never quite tell what the effect will be imtU you see a thing, but I am quite sure it would be better if it was tipped with green. Will you be good enough to tell the man there who is at work — an excellent man, knows his business, I'm sure — will you just tell him to tip it with green ? ' " ' Certainly,' said the stationmaster, going off with an official stride to the painter. We watched the encounter, noting the action of the stationmaster, who was evidently explaining Toole's views. " The painter paused for a moment or two in his work and made some response to the stationmaster, who returned to us. " ' Well,' said Toole, " what does he say ? ' " ' He says the foreman of the works is away just now, gone to his dinner, and he has no orders to introduce any other colour ; but he wUl speak to the foreman about it.' " ' Ah,' said Toole, ' thank you very much. Shall you see the foreman of the works this afternoon ? ' " ' Yes, sir, I shall.' " ' Well, now, will you be good enough to jog his memory about it ; and tell him we wish it to be tipped with green ? ' " ' I will, sir, certainly,' said the stationmaster. " The train moved quietly out of the station and brought us alongside the painter. As we passed him, Toole, with a broad grin on his face, called out : ' Hi ! you there ! painter ! ' " The man turned round a little angrily. " ' Tip it with green ! ' said Toole. WIT AND HUMOUR OF THE THEATRES 99 " The painter laid down his brush, looked a trifle savage, then gradually relapsed into a broad grim, and waved his brush at us, as he realized the situation and caught on the artificial breeze created by the passing train Toole's parting words — ' Tip it with green ! ' " CHAPTER VIII QUIN, FOOTE, BANNISTER, COLMAN ' Constant to none, Foote laughs, cries, struts and scrapes. . : Real worth of every growth shall bear Due praise, nor must we, Quin, forget thee there.'' Churchill OF the four men who may be taken as representative wits associated with the theatre, wits whose sayings were so many and so pointed that they have perhaps been credited with some things which they never said, the earUest is James Quin, whose bon-mots were much repeated in the eighteenth century. Horace Walpole, by no means a critic given to the overpraising of his contemporaries, wrote to a friend in 1765 : " Though I have httle to say, it is worth while to write, only to tell you two bon-mots of Quin, to that tmrncoat, hypocrite, infidel, bishop Warbur- ton. That saucy priest was haranguing at Bath in behalf of prerogative. Quin said, ' Pray, my lord, spare me, you are not acquainted with my principles, I am a republican ; and perhaps I even think that the execution of Charles the First might be justified.' ' Aye ! ' said Warburton, ' by what law ? ' Quin replied : ' By all the laws he had left them.' The bishop would have got off upon judgments, and bade the player remember that all the regicides came to violent ends ; a lie, but no matter. ' / would not advise your lordship,' said Quin, ' to make use of that infer- 100 QUIN, FOOTE, BANNISTER, COLMAN loi ence, for if I am not mistaken, that was the case of the twelve apostles.' There was great wit ad hominem in the latter reply, but I think the former equal to anything I ever heard. It is the sum of the whole controversy in eight monosyllables, and comprehends at once the King's guilt and the justice of punishing it. The more one examines it, the finer it proves. One can say nothing after it, so good night." In continuation of that story it may also be said that it was Quin who declared that on the 30th of January " every King in Europe must rise with a crick in his neck." Quin, who is described in The Dictionary of National Biography as " almost a great actor," was assuredly a great wit. The illegitimate son of an Irish barrister, James Quin was born in King Street, Covent Garden, on 24th February 1683. He was educated in Dublin, and was, it is believed, for a short time at Trinity College. When he was about seventeen his father died, leaving him unpro- vided for, and he at once took to the stage. By the time he was one and twenty he removed to London, and in 1715 was acting at Drury Lane, and the following year, having on an emergency to take the part of Bajazet in Tamer- lane, at once won popularity. Thenceforward, at Drury Lane, Lincoln's Inn Fields and Covent Garden he was an established favourite. In 1721 at the second-named theatre he was one of the principals in a " scene " which was the cause of a guard of soldiers being sent to the Lincoln's Inn house as well as to Drury Lane. " A drunken nobleman forced his way on the stage, and, in answer to Rich's remonstrance, slapped the manager's face. The blow was returned with interest, and a fracas ensued, in which Rich's life was only saved by the promptitude of Quin, who came to Rich's rescue with his drawn sword in his hand." That he would not have hesitated to use the 102 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS sword may be gathered from the fact that he had twice before been principal in duels with other actors and in each case had killed his opponent. He was adjudged guilty of manslaughter after one of these encounters, but escaped with a light penalty. During part of Quin's stage career he and Garrick were rivals, and though at Covent Garden they appeared for a time together, there seems to have been some degree of jealousy between them. For a time there was estrange- ment, but Quin became reconciled to the younger actor, and often visited him at his villa at Hampton. In 1751 Quin retired, and in 1766 he died at Bath. Though prob- ably vain of his success, and certainly quarrelsome, he seems to have been a kindly and generous man. Twice having talien part after his retirement in benefits for a fellow-actor, he was solicited to do so a third time, but replied : " I would play for you if I could, but will not whistle Falstaff for you. I have willed you ;fiooo ; if you want money you may have it, and save my executors trouble." Churchill, in the " Rosciad " is somewhat severe upon Quin, especially enlarging upon a fault which has been charged against some actors of more recent date : " In fancied scenes, as in life's real plan. He could not for a moment sink the man. In whate'er cast his character was laid. Self stiU, like oil, upon the surface played. Nature, in spite of all his skill, crept in : Horatio, Dorax, Falstaff — still 'twas Quin." In one of the early letters of " Humphrey Clinker " SmoUett bears testimony to the character of Quin in a way which suggests that, as the late Joseph Knight bluntly put it, many of the things said of the actor are mere lies. " So far as I am able to judge," writes Jerry Melford to a QUIN, FOOTE, BANNISTER, COLMAN 103 friend, " Quin's character is rather more respectable than it has been generally represented. His bon-mots are in every witling's mouth ... he is certainly one of the best- bred men in the kingdom. He is not only a most agree- able companion, but, as I am credibly informed, a very honest man ; highly susceptible of friendship, warm, steady, and even generous in his attachments, disdaining flattery, and incapable of meanness and dissimulation." It may be added that he was a bon vivant, and that he is credited with first having introduced the John Dory " to the tables of the delicate." II Before giving some of Quin's witty or humorous sayings, an anecdote of the rivalry between him and Garrick may be repeated. When the younger actor first took the town Quin found himself more or less forsaken, and on learning that the theatre in Goodman Fields was nightly crowded he said : " Garrick is a new religion. Whitfield was followed for a time, but they will all come to Church again." The words were of course repeated to Garrick, who replied with the following epigram : — " Pope Quin, who damns all churches but his own. Complains that heresy corrupts the town : Schism, he cries, has turned the nation's brain, But eyes will open and to church again. Thou great infallible, forbear to roar ; Thy bulls and errors are revered no more ; When doctrines meet with general approbation It is not heresy, but reformation." When Quin was lamenting one day that he grew old, an impertinent young man asked : " What would you give to 104 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS be as young as I am ? " "I would even submit," re- torted the veteran, " to be almost as foolish." Quin was at a Southampton assembly where the tem- porary master of the ceremonies was one of the masters of the mint. A lady having taken up a position in what the master of the ceremonies thotight an unfitting place he desired her to move. Quin, who was standing by, interfered, saying that she should not stir : he would be her defence. On this the master of the ceremonies flew into a rage, saying, " Quin was nothing but a stroller and a vagabond, and if it was not for his patent, he would be sent to the House of Correction." " Ay," said Quin dryly, " t'hat may be, and if it were not for your patent you would be hanged." On his removal to Bath after his retirement the actor found himself extravagantly charged for everything, and at the end of the week complained of this to Beau Nash, saying that he had invited him to Bath as being the cheapest place in England for a man of taste and a bon vivant. Nash, himself no mean utterer of wit, replied sa3dng that his townsmen had acted upon truly Christian principles. " How so ? " demanded Quin. " Why," concluded the Beau, " you was a stranger and they took you in." " Ay," retorted Quin, " that is so, but they have fleeced me instead of clothing me." It was at Bath, too, that after Quin had set the table in a roar by some sally, a nobleman not distinguished for brilliancy said : " What a pity it is, Quin, that a clever fellow like you should be only a player." " Why," retorted the wit, " what would you have me be — only a lord ? " Quin does not seem to have been wanting in that coolness which remained undaunted at a difficult moment. A gentleman whom he had offended met him in a great rage and exclaimed : " Mr Quin, I understand, sir, you have been QUIN, FOOTE, BANNISTER, COLMAN 105 taking away my name." " What have I said, sir ? " asked the actor. " You, you called me a scoimdrel ! " " Well, sir, keep your name," said Quin, and walked on. A would-be actor had been displaying his talents before Quin with the object of enlisting his help, and had delivered one or two speeches in a vile manner when Quin asked if he had done anything in comedy. " Yes," answered he eagerly " Abel in The Alchemist." " You mistake, boy," commented the wit, " it must have been the part of Cain you acted — for I'm sure you murdered Abel." The wit effectively satirized the Ministry, on being asked what it was doing, by telling a brief story which he said was exactly applicable to the situation — a story which might well serve the purposes of Opposition critics again and again. The story runs : " The master of a vessel calls down the hatchway, ' Who is there ? ' A boy answered : ' Will, sir ! ' ' What are you doing ? ' ' No- thing, sir ! ' 'Is Tom there ? ' ' Yes, sir,' says Tom. ' What are you doing ? ' ' Helping Will, sir ! ' " Like other of the wits Quin could turn his quickness of apprehension to neat compliment, as when a lady having asked why it was that there were more women than men in the world, he replied : " Madam, it is in conformity with the other arrangements of nature ; we always see more of heaven than of earth." Some of the stories of Quin's humour suggest the drollery of Sydney Smith, as, for instance, that of his being asked why he objected to angling, and replying : " Suppose some superior being should bait a hook with venison, and go a-Quinning, I should certainly bite ; and what a sight should I be dangling in the air ! " A popular pleasantry with regard to the weather — one that does duty again and again — seems traceable back to Quin. He was asked one wet and cold July whether he io6 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS ever remembered such a summer. " Yes," said he, in all seriousness, " last winter." If Quin showed a keen wit, and a lively humour, he was also not above indulging in practical joking if we are to accept the following as a true anecdote. It was published in a collection a few years after the actor's death. As Quia and another gentleman were passing one evening through St Paul's Churchyard their attention was attracted by a mob of people who were assembled to hear a man relate, " That there had been a chimney on fire in the Borough ; that he had seen, with his own eyes, the engines go, in order to extinguish it ; but that it was quite got under before they arrived." Upon seeing the attention of such a concourse of people attracted by so very unentertaining a detail, Mr Quin and his friend could not help reflecting upon the natural curiosity of Englishmen, which was excited by the most trifling circumstances, and very frequently by no circumstance at all. " Let us try," said Quin, " an experiment upon our countrjmien's curiosity." This was immediately agreed to ; and they accordingly repaired to the other side of the churchyard, where, having taken a convenient stand, and staring up to the stone gallery, Quin gravely said : " This is about the time." " Yes," replied the other, taking out his watch and looking at it under a lamp, " this was precisely the time when it made its appearance last night." They had now collected at least a dozen inquisitive spectators, who, fixing their eyes upon the building, asked " what was to be seen." To this Mr Quin replied " that the ghost of a lady who had been murdered had been seen to walk round the rails of the stone gallery for some evenings, and she was expected to walk again to-night." This information was presently spread through the multitude, which by this time was augmented to at least a hundred. All eyes were fixed upon QUIN, FOOTE, BANNISTER, COLMAN 107 the stone gallery, and imagination frequently supplied the place of reality in making them believe that they saw something move on the top of the balustrade. The joke having thus taken, Quin and his companion withdrew, went and passed the evening at the Half-Moon Tavern, in Cheapside, and upon their return, between twelve and one, the crowd stUl remained in eager expectation of the ghost's arrival. Ill Samuel Foote, who was both actor and dramatist, was born in 1720, when Quin was in the early years of his popularity, and outlived him by eleven years, dying at Dover in 1777, and being buried in Westminster Abbey. Bom of well-to-do parents at Truro, young Foote went to Oxford, where he was soon conspicuous for his gallantry and extravagant way of living. Leaving the university without permission, he forfeited his scholarship, and passed on to London and the Temple with less desire of studying law, it may be believed, than of living a fashionable life. When he was one and twenty, one of his uncles murdered the other, and Foote coolly told the full, true and particular account of the tragedy in a pamphlet, either to make a few pounds or else from sheer love of notoriety. He went on the stage as a " gentleman " — that is to say, as an amateur — but without any success, and then journeyed to Paris, where he stayed for a time. On his return to London he began work as a playwright, and soon took seriously to the stage. His powers of mimicry, his drollery, his wit and irrepressible good spirits won him attention not only in the theatre, but also in social circles. In 1766 — the victim of a practical joke — he lost a leg, and not only made a jest of the misfortune but insisted upon continuing his career as io8 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS actor, securing a patent which rendered it no longer necessary to give his performances, as he had been doing, as mere accompaniments to " tea " or " chocolate " because of the monopolies of Drury Lane and Covent Garden. As playwright, Foote met with considerable success, and some of his pieces continued to be enacted on into the nineteenth century. The detailed story of his life need not here be told ; he was one of the gayest, most irresponsible, most conscienceless and entertaining men of his time ; a fearless satirist, an entirely unselfconscious buffoon, he is chiefly interesting to us as the central figure of a number of stories. Even Samuel Johnson could not long withstand the fun of Samuel Foote, for as he said : " The first time I was in company with Foote was at Fitzherbert's. Having no good opinion of the fellow, I was resolved not to be pleased ; and it is very difficult to please a man against his wiU. I went on eating my dinner pretty sullenly, affecting not to mind him. But the dog was so very comical that I was obliged to lay down my knife and fork, throw myself back upon my chair, and fairly laugh it out. No, sir, he was irresistible." IV The stories of Foote's readiness of repartee, of the appli- cation of things seemingly remote to the matter in hand, of his drollery and almost uproarious humour are almost innumerable ; more are to be found of him than of any half-dozen of his contemporaries and successors, said Joseph Knight. A few of them are here given. A success- ful doctor being about to set up his carriage was considering what motto he should adopt, when Foote said that that surely depended upon his arms. The FROM AN E\'<;RA\-[NG liV T. SAMUEL FOOTE BLACKMORE AFTER THE PAINTING BY SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS QUIN, FOOTE, BANNISTER, COLMAN 109 doctor replied that his arms consisted of " three mallards." " Very good," said Foote, " then the motto I would recom- mend you is : ' Quack, Quack, Quack.' " Similar is the story of Davenport, a tailor, who having made a fortune was also in search of a motto for his coach. " Latin or English ? " inquired Foote. " English to be sure, I don't want to set up for a scholar." " Then I've got one from Hamlet that will suit you to a buttonhole — ' List ! List ! oh, List ! ' " We have seen that Quin regarded the Ministry as a party of men helping each other to do nothing. Foote regarded them as in a measure active, for on a friend in a coffee- house taking up a paper, " to see what the Ministry were about," he promptly advised him to " look among the robberies." On another occasion, being asked how it happened that the highest places, the more notable appoint- ments were not given to persons who excelled in knowledge and judgment, but mostly to those deficient in such qualities, he dryly replied : " It is an established custom, which promises never to be forgotten, to lay the heaviest loads on asses, not men." Foote had many digs at Garrick in consequence of the great actor's reputation , for penuriousness, and some on more general matters. One night in very hot weather he announced The Lying Valet as an afterpiece to The Devil upon Two Sticks, when Garrick meeting him called out, " Well, Sam, I see after aU you are glad to take up with one of my farces." " Why, yes, David," answered Foote, " what could I do better ? I must have some ventilator for this hot weather." The actor was one day taken into White's Club by a friend who wished to write a note. Lord Carmarthen approached, but feeling somewhat shy merely said : " Mr Foote, your handkerchief is hanging out of your pocket." no A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS Foote looked suspiciously round, and hurriedly thrusting the handkerchief back into his pocket replied : " Thank you, my lord ; you know the company much better than I do." Perhaps the happiest hit at Gaxrick's meanness was made when that actor had been satirizing someone rather unmercifully, and then stopped abruptly saying : " Well, well, perhaps before I condemn another I should pull the beam out of my own eye." " And so you would," com- mented Foote, " if you could sell the timber." A piece by an author named St John having been damned on the night of its production, a Frenchman asked Foote for the name of the author, and on learning it said : "5^ Jean, St Jean, quel St Jean?" "Oh, Monsieur," said Foote, " le gentilhomme sans la tete." Having listened for some time to the scolding of a warm- tempered lady, Foote said : "I have heard of tartar, and I've heard of brimstone — and by Jove ! madam, you are the cream of the one and the flower of the other." Another of Foote's humorous embroiderings is reminis- cent of some of the stories of Sydney Smith. A farmer who had recently buried a rich relation, an attorney, was complaining of the great expense of funerals in the country. " Why," said Foote, as though greatly surprised, " do you bury your attorneys here ? " " Yes, to be sure we do. What else should we do with 'em ? " said the farmer. " Oh, we never do that in London," responded Foote. " No ? " said the countrjnnan ; " how do you manage then ? " " Why, when the patient happens to die," explained the actor, " we lay him out in a room overnight by himself, lock the door, throw open the window, and in the morning he is gone ! " " Indeed," exclaimed the aniazed farmer ; " what becomes of him ? " " Why, that we cannot exactly tell," came the reply ; " all we know is there's a strong smell of brimstone in the room the next morning ! " QUIN, FOOTE, BANNISTER, COLMAN in Foote came one night into the Bedford, where Garrick was seated, and began giving an account of a most wonder- ful actor whom he had just seen. Garrick was on tenter- hooks of suspense, and there Foote is said to have kept him for an hour. At last, compassionating his suffering listener, Foote brought the attack to a close by asking Garrick what he thought of Mr Pitt's histrionic talents, and Garrick, glad of the release, declared that if Pitt had chosen the stage he might have been the first actor upon it. In this the low comedian played upon the tragedian's professional jealousy, and on another occasion, at the same place, he made a happy jest at Garrick's nearness in money matters. The two were about to leave the Bedford together, when Foote, in paying the bill, dropped a guinea, and not finding it at once said : " Where on earth can it be gone to ? " " Gone to the devil, I think," replied Garrick, who had been assisting in the search. " Well said, David ! " was Foote's reply ; "let you alone for making a guinea go further than anybody else." One Dr Barrowby, who was regarded as the news- monger of the Bedford Coffee-house, has left a sketch of Samuel Foote as he appeared when he first began to make the Bedford one of his chief haunts : " One evening he saw a young man extravagantly dressed out in a frock suit of green and silver lace, bag- wig, sword, bouquet, and point ruffles, enter the room and immediately join the critical circle at the upper end. Nobody recognized him, but such was the ease of his bear- ing, and the point of humour and remark with which he at once took up the conversation, that his presence seemed to disconcert no one, and a sort of pleased buzz of ' Who is he ? ' was still going round the room unanswered, when a handsome carriage stopped at the door ; he rose and 112 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS quitted the room, and the servants announced that his name was Foote, that he was a young gentleman of family and fortune, a student of the Inner Temple, and that the carriage had called for him on its way to the assembly of a lady of fashion." The same doctor later raised the laugh against the new patron of the Bedford, for when Foote was ostentatiously showing a gold repeater with the remark, " Why, my watch doesn't go ! " he quietly observed : " It soon will go." Two other anecdotes of Samuel Foote may be given, as both illustrate his humour if not his wit. He was ob- served one day by his brother the parson and some friends standing in a pensive attitude in the kitchen garden of Carlton House. " What the devil is Sam doing yonder among the cabbages ? " asked a gentleman of Parson Foote. " Let's go and see," said the parson. Accord- ingly these two with some ladies went out to the garden where the actor stood. " What are you doing there, Mr Foote ? " asked one of the ladies. " Why, madam," replied he, " I'm in raptures." " In raptures ! " said the lady. " With what ? " " With a cabbage stalk," re- sponded Foote, and immediately began the following dissertation upon it : — " A cabbage stalk, ladies and gentlemen, what shall I say of a cabbage stalk ? The first part of it to be con- sidered is the root, for without the root, nothing can be said on the matter. Well, then the root ! — observe the root, ladies. See the numerous filaments by which it receives its nurture. Were ye, ladies, but as deeply rooted in love, your fruits might be as answerable. But, to speak QUIN, FOOTE, BANNISTER, COLMAN 113 in general terms, were we but as deeply rooted in mutual friendship, our fruits would be as estimable. But, on the contrary, we had rather vegetate in a vicious soil, and on avarice, which is the root of all evil, and graft the whole fraternity of vices. " There is another reason, ladies and gentlemen, why I begin with the root of this cabbage ; because it represents the exordium of a discourse ; the stalk is the ratiocination or argumentative part, and the head is the conclusion. " The root of this cabbage I shaU compare to the King — ^because, you see, as all power and honour are derived ultimately from his Majesty, so the stalk and head of this same cabbage derive as idtimately their existence from the root. And, d'ye see, as this stalk and this head are recipro- cally an honour to the root, so his Majesty is indebted to his subjects for his wealth, his power, and his magnificence. " The root, I say, is the King ; and the stalk, then, shall be the nobUity and gentry. And, let me see, what shall be the head of the cabbage ? — Why, the common people ; — ay, the common people are the head of the nation. " Hey ? — ^What ? — ^Ay ! — I'm right in my logic, surely. This cabbage stalk is hollow ; and how many human cabbage stalks are there in this vast garden the world — Hey ? How many hj^ocrites ? — ^This stalk was once of a lovely green, full of sap, but now dried and withered. And what is the fate of man but that of a cabbage stalk ? Nay, my little preaching puppy of a brother here, who stands by me, must, if he wishes to display his oratorial powers, actually imagine that his hearers are all cabbage stalks ! It will be then that soft persuasion, like Hyblsean honey, will flow from his lips ; then that the blaze of eloquence will warm his audience ; — ^then — ^but, by Jupiter, 'tis dinner-time — ^my reflections are over — so there is an end of my dissertation on a cabbage stalk." 114 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS The other story is generally credited to Foote, though Mr Percy Fitzgerald in his recent biography of the actor- wit casts doubt upon its being his, and points out that it is also sometimes fathered on Quin, andthatitsfirst-knownap- pearance in print was in one of Maria Edgeworth's stories in 1825. It has also, I may mention, been ascribed to Curran, but untU further evidence is forthcoming it is likely to remain attached to the name of Foote, and there- fore is included here. When Macklin was giving mis- cellaneous lectures at the coffee-house which he had set up after his first retirement from the stage, Foote is said to have been a frequent attendant, and an invariable quizzer. On one occasion when speaking of memory Macklin claimed for himself that on one reading he could learn anything by rote. Foote waited untU the close of the lecture and then gravely handed up the following famous piece of nonsense, asking that the lecturer would be good enough to read the words once and then repeat them from memory : — " So she went into the garden to cut a cabbage leaf, to make an apple pie ; and at the same time a great she-bear coming up the street pops its head into the shop. ' What ! No soap ? ' So he died, and she very imprudently married the barber ; and there were present the Picaninnies, and the JoblUlies, and the Garyulies, and the grand Panjan- drum himself, with the little round button at top ; and they all fell to playing the game of catch-as-catch-can, till the gunpowder ran out at the heels of their boots." VI Another eighteenth-century actor to whom many of the anecdotes of the time were attributed was Charles Ban- QUIN, FOOTE, BANNISTER, COLMAN 115 nister, father of John Bannister, who won greater fame on the stage as one of the brightest stars in " the galaxy of comic actors which marked the close of the last and the beginning of the present [nineteenth] century." Born in Gloucestershire about 1738, Charles Bannister's boyhood was passed at Deptford, where his father held an official position. There he early had the run of the theatre and there, it is said, before he was eighteen he performed as a gentleman amateur not only Romeo but Richard the Third. Having sought an engagement with Garrick un- successfully he joined the Norwich circuit, afterwards reaching London as an assistant to Foote. Later he was at Drury Lane and other of the leading theatres, and came to be known not only as a capable actor but as one of the notable social figures of his time, owing to his good nature, his easy-going habits and his readiness in rejoinder. Meeting in Covent Garden a couple of stage friends arm- in-arm — Dignum and Moses Kean, both of whom had been tailors — " I never see these men together," said Baimister, " but they put me in mind of Shakespeare's comedy Measure for Measure." The author of a farce entitled Fire and Water was nervous as to the reception of his piece. " Oh ! " said Bannister confidently, " its fate is assured." " What fate?" inquired the anxious author. " What fate!" echoed Bannister, " why, what can fire and water produce but a hiss ? " A celebrated singer noted almost as much for his awk- ward manners as for his melodious voice was explaining to Bannister that he attributed that voice to the fact that as a boy of fifteen he had swallowed by accident some train oil. " Did you so ? " retorted Bannister, " well, I don't think it would have done you any harm if, at the same time, you had swallowed a dancing master." ii6 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS A physician observing Bannister about to drink a glass of brandy said : " Don't drink that filthy stuff ; brandy is the worst enemy you have." " I know that," replied the actor, " but you know we are commanded by Scripture to love owe enemies." Bannister flourished in days when the pun was still in vogue, despite Johnson's ludicrous assertion that the man who would make a pun would pick a pocket, and several stories are told of his use of this most obvious manifesta- tion of wit. A friend is said to have been complaining that some malicious person had cut off his horse's tail, which, as he wished to sell it, must prove a great draw- back. " Not at all," said the actor, " you must now sell him wholesale." " Wholesale ! " exclaimed the other. " How so ? " " Because you cannot re-tail him." Someone inquiring after a man who had been hanged, and on being told simply that he was dead, asked further, " Did he continue in the grocery line ? " " Oh no," said Bannister, with emphasis, " he was in quite a different line when he died." The younger Bannister seems to have inherited some- thing of his father's readiness of speech, for a story is told of Barrymore's arriving late at the theatre and having to dress for his part, being driven to desperation because he could not find the key of his drawer. " Damn it ! " he exclaimed, " I must have swallowed it." " Never mind," said John, " it wUl serve to open your chest." VII George Colman, the younger, was another of the men who, recognized as humorists by their contemporaries, come to be the centripetal force attracting to them any QUIN, FOOTE, BANNISTER, COLMAN 117 good stories that are ensured a hearing and given a vrai- semblance by being attached to a known name. It is not, of course, possible to say which are the genuine sayings of such a man and which are those that have been given him by fame. The son of a successful plajnvright, yoimg Colnlan was born in 1762, and was educated first at West- minster and then at Oxford. At the university his record was much the same as that of Foote — gaiety, irresponsibility and withdrawal. He was then sent to complete his education at King's College, Aberdeen. While still a student he began plajrwriting, and on returning to London continued the work and at the age of twenty-five succeeded his father in the management of the Haymarket Theatre. Quarrelsome and extravagant, he was in con- tinuous trouble, and at one time was compelled to reside in the King's Bench Prison for debt. He seems, however, to have had frequent liberty privileges, on one occasion being released that he might accept an invitation to dine with the Duke of York to meet the Prince Regent ! When that prince became George the Fourth he appointed Col- man Lieutenant of the Yeomen of the Guard — an appoint- ment which Colman turned into hard cash by selling it. In 1824 he was made Examiner of Plays, and held the of&ce for a dozen years, until his death in 1836 — held it against all the objurgations of his fellow-dramatists who resented the puerile squeamishness with which he, " the author of some of the least decent publications of the day," used, or abused, the duties of his office. Colman is the first instance of one of otir wits and humorists publishing non-theatrical works of amusement. His " Broad Grins " marked an era in this kind of litera- ture, and remained in circulation for nearly a century. It is, however, not with his published pleasantries that we are here concerned but with the utterances of a witty or ii8 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS humorous character with which he is credited. Many oi these show Colman as a happy master of the pun, though in some the significance suggests rather the subtlety of wit than the superficiaUty of the mere play upon words. When he was in his last illness — in the case of humorists tradition is very strong in insisting upon the ruling passion being strong in death — the doctor who was attending him arrived late one day and apologized saying that he had been called to see a man who had fallen down a well. " Did he kick the bucket, doctor ? " inquired Colman. A sentimental young man being overheard to say : " I live in Jiilia's eyes," Colman broke in with : " I don't wonder at it since I observed she had a sty in them when I saw her last." Another young man being pressed to sing after he declared that he could not, said impatiently that the company were wanting to make a butt of him. " Not at all, my good sir," said Colman, " we merely want to get a stave out of you." In each of these cases the perfect applicability of the second meaning makes the pun a good one. More forced was his remark to an apothecary, by whom he considered himself to be overcharged, when he said as for the visits he could return them and as for the medicine he could dispense -with it. Neater was his remark on being told that a man of no high character had grossly abused him : " The scandal and ill-report of some persons that might be mentioned was like fuller's earth ; it daubs your coat a little for a time, but when it is rubbed off your coat is so much the cleaner." An often repeated mot that has been allotted to various wits, but most frequently to Colman, is that the humorist on being asked if he knew Theodore Hook replied, " Yes, hook and eye are old acquaintances." Boswell records a pleasantry of the elder George Colman QUIN, FOOTE, BANNISTER, COLMAN 119 which shows that the father had something of the ready humour more often associated with the son. At the Literary Club Boswell was talking of Johnson having returned from the tour in Scotland " willing to believe in second sight." " I was then so impressed with many of the stories which I had been told, that I avowed my conviction saying : ' He is only willing to believe — I do believe ; the evidence is enough for me though not for his great mind. What will not fill a great bottle will fill a a pint bottle ; I am filled with belief." " Are you ? " said George Colman, " then cork it up." CHAPTER IX WIT IN POLITICS -■ Ye wondrous men Of wit and wisdom.'' Thomas Moore AS with the stage so with the arena of pohtics, it woiild not be difficult to compile a volume of the good thiags that have been said within it. It is only possible in a short chapter to indicate the range and variety of the witticisms recorded by or of men in the Houses of Parliament or on their way to them. It may be that the atmosphere of the Houses, like that of the courts of law, is of a kind which distorts and enlarges the thing said so that a passable pleasantry looms for the moment with the largeness of wit. It is not in these cases from any rarefied atmosphere such as makes the shadow of one upon a peak gigantic, but rather it may be imagined the density such as that of the " London particular " which imparts to the famUiar a suggestion of greatness un- familiar. The late Mr Gladstone declared that the witty things said in the House of Commons — and his long attend- ance there should have constituted him an authority — were few. Something far short of wit may, however, readily receive the meed of laughter, and the interpolation of that word in reports is by no means always preceded by anything which wUl stand the test of time — otherwise WIT IN POLITICS 121 Hansard would be a formidable rival to Punch, and the task of selection of representative political witticisms be rendered yet more difficult. It is indeed manifest that in the very nature of things the witticisms should occur less in the formal speeches addressed to the whole House (and the reporters) than in the personal " asides " of members, in the Lobbies, smoking-rooms and places where the reporter's pencil ceases from scratching and the " Parliamentary sketch " writer does not penetrate. II Before proceeding to some examples of politicians' wit the following story may be given in illustration of the humour of a mid-eighteenth-century election — although it is of humour closing in the tragic. Dr William Barrow- by, a noted physician of the time, had much interested himself in the cause of Sir George Vandeput who was opposed to Lord Trentham, the nominee of the court party. Barrowby was at the time attending Joe Weatherby, who kept the Ben Jonson's Head in Russell Street, Covent Garden. During the doctor's visits the patient's wife — ^not knowing Barrowby's particular poli- tical bias — frequently expressed the hope that her Joey would be weU enough to record a vote for her good friend Lord Trentham before the poll closed. Calling on his patient one day at the close of the election, the doctor was astonished to find him up and almost dressed by the nurse and her assistants. " Heyday ! what's the cause of this ? " exclaimed Barrowby, " why should you get out of bed without my directions ? " " Dear doctor," said poor old Weatherby, in broken accents, " I am going to poll." 122 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS " To poll," replied the doctor, with great warmth — supposing that he took the same side as his wife — " going to the devil, you mean, ; why, do you not know that the cold air must destroy you ? Get to bed, man ; get to bed as fast as you can, or immediate death may ensue ! " " Oh, sir, if that be the case," said the patient, " to be sure I must act as you advise ; but I love my country, sir, and thought, whUe my wife was out, to seize this oppor- tunity to go to Covent Garden church, and vote for Sir George." " How, Joey, for Sir George ? " " Yes, sir, I wish him heartily well." " Do you ? " says Barrowby, the politician getting the better of the doctor. " Hold ! nurse, don't pull off his stockings again ; let me feel his pulse. Hey ! very well, a good firm stroke ; this will do. You took the pills I ordered last night ? " " Yes, doctor, but they made me very sick." " Ay, so much the better. How did your master sleep, nurse ? " " Oh, charmingly, sir," answered the nurse. " Did he ? Well, if his mind be uneasy about this election he must be indulged, for diseases of the mind greatly affect those of the body. Come, come, throw a great-coat or blanket about him ; it is a fine day, but the sooner he goes the better. Here, here, lift him up ; a ride will do him good ; he shall go to the hustings in my chariot." The doctor was directly obeyed, and poor Weatherby was carried to the poU and dtily gave his vote. Two hours after his doctor had left him at his own house he died, loaded with the reproaches of his wife and her friends. WIT IN POLITICS 123 III Passing from the tactics of those wishing to get a certain man in we may glance at some of the things said in the House itself or elsewhere by politicians. Sleep out of place seems irresistible to the risible faculties of most people — especially audible sleep — and the snorer shares with the mother-in-law popularity as a fun-maker. In a laugh-provoking brochure of a few years ago repeated fun was made of the supposed readiness with which a member of the House of Lords could emulate the " Fat Boy." In- deed somnolence in the House of Commons seems in each successive generation to have afforded matter out of which in the opposing attitudes of the non-humorous and the humorous has come fun. Of Lord North several stories are told in this connexion, as when an indignant speaker reproved him for sleeping in the House and he replied : " The physician should never quarrel with the effect of his own medicine." The earliest incident is probably the following, recorded by Aubrey, about Henry Martin in the Commonwealth Parliament — a man whose speeches " were not long, but wondrous poignant, pertinent and witty." " He was wont to sleep much in the House (at least dog- sleepe) ; Alderman Atkins made a motion that such scandalous members as slept and minded not the business of the House, should be putt out. Henry Martin starts up, ' Mr Speaker, a motion has been to turn out the N adders ; I desire the Noddies may also be turned out.' " Martin was, Aubrey further tells us, " of an incomparable wit for repartees." " Making an invective speech one time against old Sir Harry Vane, when he had done with him, he said, But for young Sir Harry Vane — and so sate him downe. Severall cried out — ' What have you to say 124 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS to young Sir Harry ? ' He rises up : Why, if young Sir Harry lives to be old, he will be old Sir Harry ! and so sate down, and set the House a laughing, as he oftentimes did." " Oliver Cromwell once in the House called him Sir Harry Martin ! Henry Martin rises and bowes, ' I thanke your Majestie, I always thought when you were King that I should be knighted." " A godly member made a motion to have all profane and unsanctified persons expelled the Houses. Henry Martin stood up and moved that all the fooles might be putt out likewise — and then there would be a thin House." If not wit there was certainly wisdom in his statement that " if his Majesty should take advice of his gunsmiths and powder men he would never have peace." A little later than Martin we have the third Lord Falk- land, chiefly remembered as author of a play entitled The Marriage Night, who, on .being chosen for Parlia- ment at an unusually early age, had his admission to the House opposed by some members on the ground that, being so young, he had not yet sown his wild oats. " Then," said he, " it will be the best way to sow them in the House where there are so many geese to pick them up." At the Restoration Henry Martin, though nearly eighty years of age, was in danger of his life, having been one of the judges at the trial of Charles the First, but he was saved by the readiness of Lord Falkland, who said " Gentleman," ye talke here of makeing a sacrifice ; it was the old lawe, all sacrifices were to be without spot or blemish ; and now you are going to make an old rotten rascal a sacrifice.' This witt tooke in the House, and saved his life." Aubrey tells us further that " this very jest " had been used many years earlier by Henry Martin himself, when Sir William Davenant was in danger of his life as a Royalist. WIT IN POLITICS 125 IV With the development of Party — the diverging of men along two more or less parallel lines, those who followed one ever looking forward, whUe those who followed the other ever looked behind — the opportunities for the exercise of wit in politics became greatly increased, and the popular- izing of politics, which was an inevitable corollary of the development of the newspaper press, led to the recording of more examples. But even so, it is in the very nature of things political that they should largely be of temporary interest, and that the mots to which they give birth should lose their pungency the further they are removed from the circumstances which inspired them. Many of the sayings, however, are based on essential matters, and their point remains unblunted by the passage of years ; though the course of time has modified those inspired by a taste for personalities. It is scarcely possible to think of a present- day party leader retaliating on an opponent as did the Earl of Chatham, who, when plain WUliam Pitt, had allowed himself to refer in the House of Commons to an opponent's personal appearance. The member referred to complained bitterly of the abuse, declaring that he could not help his looks and ending, as he thought triumphantly, with " the honourable gentleman finds fault with my features ; how would he have me look ? " Pitt at once started to his feet. " The honourable gentleman asks me how I would have him look. I would have him look as he ought, if he could ; I would have him look as he cannot, if he would ; I would have him look like an honest man." Among political wits of the eighteenth century. Lord North, Prime Minister — though he refused to recognize the title — at the time of the " Boston Tea Party " and the 126 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS subsequent struggle by which the North American Colonies became the United States of America, occupies a high position, though not many of his sayings have come down to us. Burke described him as a man " of infinite wit and pleasantry," and some of his retorts illustrate the sweetness of his temper no less than the readiness of his mind. The most diverse men testify to his possession of two qualities but rarely found in conjunction. Horace Walpole who visited him in 1787, after he had gone blind, said : " Lord North's spirits, good humour, wit, sense, drollery, are as perfect as ever — the unremitting attention of Lady North and his children most touching. ... If ever loss of sight could be compensated, it is by so affectionate a family." Gibbon too spoke of " the lively vigour of his mind, and the felicity of his incomparable temper." His wit is said to have been of that rare rich kind which never gives offence, but is as provocative of laughter in its object as in others. One night the House of Commons was in ill humour, and North deprecated the too great readiness to take offence which seemed to possess the members. " One member," he said, " who spoke of me, called me ' that thing of a minister.' To be sure," he added, patting his portly form, " I am a thing ; the member, therefore, when he called me a thing, said what was true, and I could not be angry with him ; but when he added, ' that thing called a minister,' he called me that thing which, of all things, he himself wished to be, and therefore I took it as a compliment." A remark intended offensively could not have been turned more good-naturedly. As with a late statesman of our time, many stories were told of Lord North's somnolence in the House and else- where ; once an opponent who had been bitterly declaiming against the minister wound up by saying that he was capable of sleeping while he ruined his country. North WIT IN POLITICS 127 said that it was hard to be denied the solace which other criminals so often enjoyed — ^that of having a night's rest before their fate. On another occasion another member of the Opposition, a poor and long-winded speaker, made a like complaint, but North contented himself with saying that it was cruel that a man should be grudged so natural a release from considerable suffering, adding that it was somewhat unjust to complain of him for taking the remedy which the speaker had himself been considerate enough to administer. When a member suggested having a starling placed near the chair, and taught to repeat the cry of " Infamous coalition ! " Lord North suggested that as long as the honourable member proposing it was preserved to them, it would be a needless waste of public money, since the starling might so well perform his office by deputy. The King having asked who a certain gentleman impor- tunate for places was Lord North said : " He is the Secretary of State for Ireland ; a man on whom if your Majesty was pleased to bestow the United Kingdom, he would ask for the Isle of Man as a potato garden ! " When Lord North was in particular disfavour with the Opposition an excited orator said : " We must have the noble lord's head ! " North quietly observed : " If he only knew how httle I want to have his ! " Lord North was not incapable of making a jest of the terrible affliction of his later years ; being visited by Colonel Barre, who was nearly as blind as himself, he met him with " Colonel Barre, nobody will suspect us of insin- cerity if we say that we should always be overjoyed to see each other." Fox having said that he would like to devise a tax which should not fall upon himself. Lord North promptly sug- gested : " Tax receipts, for you never see them." 128 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS Lord North's daughter — Lady Charlotte Lindsay — seems to have inherited something of her father's readiness of wit, for it is said that, arriving late for dinner at HoUand House, she apologized to her hostess saying, " I am exceed- ingly sorry, but reaUy the roads are so macadamnable ! " It has been suggested in an earlier chapter that Samuel Johnson's ponderous delight in jesting at the expense of the Scots is in part responsible for the long-continued gibing at those who belong north of the Tweed, but it is possible that the fashion owes something also to the un- popularity of Lord Bute and the many countrymen of his for whom he found places ; if indeed it was not even then a revival of an earlier fashion set in the days when some of those who attended James the Sixth of Scotland on his journey south remained with him after he had become James the First of England. Certainly Bute did not make his people poptilar when he became the chief counsellor of George the Third. Horace Walpole records that in 1762 Bute had a crowded levee and as the visitors were arriving in great numbers, George Brudenel, who was passing, was asked by a bystander what was going on. " Why," answered he, " there is a Scotchman got into the Treasury, and they can't get him out." That one of the Scots ministers of the time seems him- self to have been possessed of a readiness of wit is shown by the following. When George the Third was driving to the House of Lords in 1797 — at a moment when democratic feeling ran high — ^his coach was attacked by the mob. A gigantic Irishman attracted the attention of the King as being conspicuously energetic in keeping off the attackers. Not long after the Irishman received a message asking him to call and see Henry Dundas. He went and met with a gracious reception at the hands of the statesman, who praised his loyalty and courage, and requested him to point WIT IN POLITICS 129 out in what way his interests could be advanced, as the King wished to reward him. The Irishman hesitated, and then said slyly : " I'll tell you what, mister, make a Scotch- man of me." The minister was somewhat taken aback by this tactless pleasantry, but only for a moment, then he replied : " Make a Scotchman of you, sir ? That's im- possible, for I cannot give you prudence." The elder Pitt has been shown as capable of using a telling personality, his son the " heaven-sent minister " is credited with the neat application of another man's remark which is essentially witty. When preparing his Additional Force Bill of 1805 he held a meeting of country gentlemen, chiefly militia ofiicers, to consider the measTore. One of these officers objected to a clause for calling out the force, which he insisted should not be done " except in case of actual invasion." Pitt replied : " That would be too late." But the gentleman insisted upon his point. By-and-by they came to another clause, devised to render the force more disposable. The same gentleman objected again, and insisted very warmly that he would never consent to its being sent out of England. " Except, I suppose," rejoined Pitt pointedly, " in case of actual invasion." Of the great rivals, Edmund Burke and Charles James Fox, the anecdote-mongers recorded many stories, of the latter largely those concerning his friendship with the Prince of Wales and Sheridan, or about his eternal want of pence. Though Edmund Burke was an Irishman, and one of the most brilliant of our orators, he does not appear to have been gifted with the peculiar aptitude of bringing opposites together to produce the flash of wit. The 130 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS retorts of his which have been remembered are rather witty illustrations than essential wit, though some of them have the rarer quality. When someone described a certain biography as being a successful imitation of Johnson's style, Burke emphatically demurred : " No, no, it is not a good imitation of Johnson. It has all his pomp without his force ; it has all the nodosities of the oak without its strength " — ^then after a pause — " it has all the contortions of the Sibyl, without the inspiration." The oak provided Burke with another illustration when he summed up Lord Thurlow — of whom Charles James Fox wondered whether anybody could be as wise as he looked — as " a stiurdy oak when at Westminster, and a willow at St James's." David Hartley, member for Hull during the Coalition Ministry, was remarkable for speeches not only lengthy but duU. On one occasion, having prosed on until three- quarters of the members had left the chamber, just as the remnant hoped he was about to conclude he moved, to prove some assertion that he had made, that the Riot Act should be read. Burke at once rose exclaiming : " The Riot Act ! my dear sir ! the Riot Act ! to what purpose ? Don't you see that the mob is already completely dis- persed ? " Everyone present roared with laughter — ^with the exception of Hartley, who, ignoring the interruption, still insisted that the Riot Act should be read by the clerk. When the attachment of Fox to France was mentioned Burke commented : " Yes, his attachment has been great and long ; for, like a cat, he has continued faithful to the house after the family has left it." It being remarked that persons calling themselves democrats did not hold long together, Burke said that such a result was to be anticipated, as " birds of prey are not gregarious." WIT IN POLITICS 131 Two of Burke's sayings are connected with the impeach- ment of Warren Hastings. When he was speaking he was interrupted by a Major Scott, and broke the thread of his oratory to ask : " Am I to be teased by the barking of this jackal when I am attacking the royal tiger of Bengal ? " On someone repeating to him Erskine's opinion of the impeachment he exclaimed indignantly : " What ! a nisi- prius lawyer give an opinion on an impeachment ! as well might a rabbit that breeds fifty times in the year, pretend to understand the gestation of an elephant." Burke's great rival, Charles James Fox, was no mean master of the retort. When Lord North was exulting over the news that had been received that New York was con- quered, " It is a mistake, my lord," said Fox, " New York is not conquered ; it is only like the Ministry — abandoned." Fox having applied to a Westminster voter for his interest at an election, the free and independent one said that he would be very glad to oblige him with a halter. Fox was equal to the occasion and courteously thanked him for the kind offer, but said he would not by any means deprive the man of it, as the thing was obviously an heirloom in his family. Asked by a friend to explain the meaning of the passage in the Psalms, " He clothed himself with cursing, like as with a garment," Fox answered with an excellent example of the pun, " The meaning I think is clear enough — the man had a habit of swearing." Fox propounded a neat conundrum in, "I would not be my first for all of my second that is contained in my whole." The answer is " Scotland." Fox was a younger son of the first Lord Holland, a statesman for whom few historians have a good word, a minister who was described in a petition from the city of London as " the public defaulter of unaccounted millions." 132 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS When Lord Holland's iniquities as Paymaster-General were the topic of the town he was driving with his son Charles and had the temerity to ask the young man what the world was thinking of him. Fox excused himsfelf, saying that his father might be angry if he told the truth, but the latter said he would hear the truth whatever it may be. " Why, then, sir," said his son, " they say that there is not a greater rogue unhanged." " And pray, sir," said Lord Holland, " where is your spirit not to resent such an injiu'y ? " " My lord," replied the son, " I should by no means want spirit to resent any injury offered to my father, as I look upon it the same as to myself ; nor should any single person dare to mention it with impunity. But, surely, my lord, you would not have me fight everybody." At Brookes' s, Fox had made some remark about the government gimpowder which Adams considered a reflec- tion, and at once challenged him. They duly met, and the burly Fox stood full front towards his opponent, and on being told that he must stand sideways said : " Why, I am as thick one way as the other." When the signal was given, Adams fired but Fox refrained from doing so, and when the seconds said that he must do so, emphatically said : " I'll be damned if I do, I've no quarrel." When the principals shook hands after the encounter, Fox, who had been wounded, though not severely, said : " Adams, you'd have killed me if it had not been government powder." VI When Richard Brinsley Sheridan was the wit of the Whigs, the Tories had no unworthy rival to him in George Canning, one of the very ablest of William Pitt's lieu- WIT IN POLITICS 133 tenants. (" A pert London joker," Peter Plymley was made to term him.) Born in 1770, Canning lost his father the following year, was taken up by an uncle, sent to Eton (where he edited The Microcosm) and to Oxford, and in 1793 entered Parliament as a supporter of Pitt, was soon placed in a minor office and in a somewhat politically chequered career rose to be Foreign Minister and Leader of the House of Commons on the death of Castlereagh in 1822, and Prime Minister on the death of Lord Liverpool early in 1827. In the following August he died. It is not necessary here, where it is with his wit that we are con- cerned, to enlarge upon the life and work of a statesman who laid down those broad lines of our foreign policy which have been followed more or less closely for nearly a hundred years. Nor need we here do more than mention the humours of The Microcosm or the famous contributions to The Anti- Jacobin. It is the Canning whom B5nron described as one " who bred a statesman yet was bom a wit," and whom Thomas Moore summed up as " cracking out jokes at every motion," that calls for inclusion in this company of con- versational wits, and even three or four of his mots will suffice to show that he is to be regarded as one of the leaders. Very neat was his reply to Bishop Legge, who had inquired what the statesman thought of his sermon. " Why, it was a short sermon," " Oh yes," said the preacher, " you know I avoid being tedious." " But you were tedious," replied Canning. He was occasionally as happy in his House of Commons' humour as was Sheridan himself. " Gentlemen opposite," he said once, " are always talking of the people as dis- tinguished from the rest of the nation. But strip the nation of its aristocracy ; strip it of its magistrates ; strip it of its clergy, of its merchants, of its gentry, and I no 134 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS more recognize a people than I recognize in the bird of Diogenes the man of Plato." When the " hoarse Fitzgerald " of Byron's " English Baxds and Scotch Reviewers " had recited one of his own poems at a dinner, Canning quietly remarked : " Poeta nascitur, non fitz." Upon a very tall and very stout Oxford friend he ex- temporized the following epigram : — " That the stones of our chapel are both black and white Is most undeniably true ; But as Douglas walks o'er them both morning and night, It's a wonder they're not black and blue." According to Moore the person who cannot relish the following reply of Canning's " can have no perception of real wit." A lady having asked the silly question : " Why have they made the spaces in the iron gate at Spring Gardens so narrow ? " Canning answered : " Oh, madam, because such very fat people used to go through." Which is certainly a happy illustration of answering a fool according to his folly. At the Clifford Street Club (at the corner of Old Bond Street) in a debate on the French Revolution, Canning was inveighing against Mirabeau. The president had called for a pot of porter, and on its being put on the table Canning at once made use 'of it as an illustration : " Sir, much has been said about the gigantic powers of Mirabeau. Let us not be carried away by the false jargon of his phil- osophy, or imagine that deep political wisdom resides in trained and decorated diction. To the steady eye of a sagacious criticism, the eloquence of Mirabeau will appear to be as empty and as vapid as his patriotism. It is like the beverage that stands so invitingly before you — ^foam and froth at the top, heavy and muddy within ! " WIT IN POLITICS 135 One version of a pun-obvious — ^repeated it may be believed in varying form by every generation of pun- makers — is said by Coleridge to have been made by Canning. They were at dinner at Hookham Frere's, where a loquacious ambassador bored everybody by monopolizing the talk. A poem on the Flood having been mentioned. Lord resumed and spoke in raptures of a picture that he had lately seen of Noah's ark, saying that the animals were all marching two and two, the little ones first, and the elephants coming last in great majesty, filling up the foreground. " Ah, no doubt, my lord," interrupted Canning, " your elephants, wise fellows, stayed behind to pack up their trunks." When a boyat Eton Canning had started The Microcosm, which the Westminster boys imitated with The Trifler, wherein they depicted Justice weighing their merits against those of the Etonians — the scale of the former being low, the other high. On seeing this, young Canning impromptued : " What mean ye, by this print so rare. Ye wits — of Eton jealous — But that we soar aloft in air And ye are heavy fellows." VII Gladstone, having said that the witty things uttered in the House of Commons were but few, was asked if he could recall any of them, and replied that the best one he had ever heard was a reply made by Lord John Russell to Sir Francis Burdett. Having been at one time a Radical, Burdett changed and became an extreme Tory. In the course of a speech in the House he declared that 136 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS there was nothing more odious than the cant of patriotism. Lord John replied that " the cant of patriotism was no doubt very odious, but there was one thing even more odious — ^that was the re-cant of patriotism ! " A story that Lord John Russell himself used to tell was of having Sat at a city banquet next to a civic dig- nitary who taking a very beautiful snuff box from his pocket said : " This was given to my father by the first Napoleon ; there is a hen on the top of it." " Surely," said RusseU, " it cannot be a hen, it must be an eagle. " No, no," said the owner, " it's a hen " — pointing as he spoke to the " N " on the lid ! In matters of wit it may perhaps be admissible to differ from Gladstone, but another story which he told is surely a better thing than the pun of Lord John Russell, though the pun had the intention of wit and the wit of the follow- ing lies entirely in its application by the hearers and not at all in the consciousness of the speaker. The way in which that which issued from the lips of a speaker as a matter-of-fact statement may become wit on reaching the ears of the hearers is well exemplified in a story told by Gladstone of a speech of Cobden's in the House of Commons. The great Free Trader was replsmig to Disraeli in an admirable speech. Sir Robert Peel, sitting between the speaker and Gladstone, turned to the latter and said : " What a consummate speech he is making ! " Presently, in order to explain more fully some point, Cobden said : " Now, I will give an illustration of what I mean. Here is my honourable friend the member for Durham sitting by me. He is a spinner of long yarns of a low quality." The House, of course, screamed with laughter, while Cobden is said to have stood for some moments absolutely unable to con- ceive what had occasioned the outbreak. WIT IN POLITICS 137 A lady was telling Lord Palmerston that her maid objected to going to the Isle of Wight again, as the climate " was not embracing enough," and added, " What am I to do with such a woman ? " The statesman replied, " You had better take her to the Isle of Man next time." A story that has been told of the Earl of Beaconsfield was, it has been stated, invented by Sir Henry W. Lucy, and fathered on the great Conservative leader, but I am not at all sure that it was not an old story revived with up-to-date " colour." It refers to a rich old philanthropist who was a Member of Parliament, though so deaf that he had to use an ear-trumpet, and it runs that Dizzy from the Peers' Gallery seeing the poor man straining his hearing to follow the de- bate remarked that " he never saw a man so little appreciative of his natural advantages." ^ Cardwell being in temporary charge of the House had occasion to reply to some member's question about a matter of taste. The member asked : " Why on earth did you answer me ? What do you know about art ? " " Nothing at aU," said Cardwell — " that's just why I was the right person to answer you." VIII If we come down to recent times it appears that some of our politicians of to-day, if they have not established reputations as wits in the old fashion, have yet no mean mastery of the knack of retort. Though I have made it a rule to exclude unattached bon-mots from this miscellany ^ The same story is ascribed to Robert Lowe in Mr William Jean's recent "Parliamentary Reminiscences." 138 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS the description of the taciturn Duke of Devonshire, when as Marquis of Hartington he was Leader of his party in the House of Commons, as a " Lieder ohne Worte," is too happy to be omitted. I have not been able to learn who hit upon the happy polyglot pun. No one who had only heard the late Lord Goschen as a platform speaker would associate him with punning, yet it is recorded that some years ago, when Sir Charles Wyndham returned from a successful engagement in Germany, Goschen, then Chan- cellor of the Exchequer, took the chair at a welcoming dinner at the Criterion, and began his speech with : " Gentlemen, our friend has been on the Spree in Berlin, and although he got an excellent reception there, that's no Criterion." It was, indeed, but a poor thing, if his own. A later Chancellor of the Exchequer is credited with several happy retorts. Mr Lloyd George has the Celtic quickness of dual per- ception which is essential to wit. On one occasion he began a speech by sa3nng, " I am here " and before he could say further an unmannerly interrupter shouted, " And so am I ! " " Yes," was the ready reply, " but you are not all there." Again, when he was talking about Home Rule, and saying that he wanted to see it not only for Ireland, but for Scotland and for Wales — " And for hell, too ! " exclaimed a would-be humorist. " Certainly, my friend," came Mr Lloyd George's unexpected retort, " I always like to hear a man stand up for his country." Recently, in the debate on the Insurance BO, the Chan- cellor was speaking on a point of order in the House of Commons when a member said he cotild not hear the right hon. gentleman, who, as he was facing the Chair, had his back to the majority of members. " There is my difficulty," replied Mr Lloyd George. " I have been told WIT IN POLITICS 139 to address the Chair." " Address the Chair," came the reply, " but speak in this direction." " That," said Mr Lloyd George, " would involve something that I never do — facing both ways." Mr John Burns is also known to be the wielder of forcible if not pointed reply. When some superior person asked him, " At what University were you edu- cated ? " he answered readily, " The University of the World." CHAPTER X SHERIDAN " The flash of Wit, the bright intelligence, The beam of Song, the blaze of Eloquence, Set with their Sun, but still have left behind The enduring produce of immortal Mind ; Fruits of a genial mom, and glorious noon, A deathless part of him that died too soon. Byron THE place of Richard Brinsley Sheridan is not easily decided upon among the wits when we come to classify them according to occupation. He was an Irish- man with more than an average share of the mental alert- ness of the race ; he was a dramatist whose comedies established a new era in our literary history, and he was a noted political and social figure of his time. Yet he stands out so much as an individual wit that he cannot fairly be allotted to any one of these categories, but demands something of separate treatment. Though he discounted the readiness of his wit by saying that " a true- trained wit lays his plan like a general — foresees the cir- cumstance of the conversation — surveys the ground and contingencies — and detaches a question to draw you into the palpable ambuscade of his ready-made joke," yet that amusing account must not be taken too literally as imply- ing such was always his own method. Many of his witti- 140 RICHARD IIRINSLEV SHERIDAN FROM THE I'AINTINf; \:\ J. RUS>^ELI., K.A., IN THli KA'IKiiNAI. iRTKAIT (.AI.LERV SHERIDAN 141 cisms were obviously inspired by the moment, though others may have been carefully elaborated. Strangely different was the impression he made upon different listeners — Lord Byron said that " Sheridan's humour, or rather wit, was always saturnine, and sometimes savage. He never laughed, at least that I saw, and I watched him. In society I have met him frequently ; he was superb." Savage some of his sayings may have been, but saturnine he did not appear to others ; his suavity indeed struck one observer, while another said of him that " he some- times displayed a kind of serious and elegant playfulness, not apparently rising to wit, but unobservedly saturated with it, which was unspeakably pleasing." In the home as in society he was noted for his plaj^ul fancy and ready wit 11 Grandson of Dr Sheridan, the friend and confidant of Jonathan Swift, author of a whimsical treatise on " The Art of Punning," " iU-starred, good-natured and improvi- dent, a punster, a quibbler, a fiddler and a wit " ; son of Thomas Sheridan, actor, theatrical manager, and "orator "; — Richard Brinsley Sheridan may be said to have raised to the nth some of the qualities for which his immediate forebears were distinguished. Good-nature and improvid- ence — the two so often twinned in the same character — the capacity for wit, from its lowest form of punning to its sharpest, dramatist, theatrical manager and orator, young Sheridan would have formed a good example for the student of eugenics had the science been invented in his day. He was bom on 30th October 1751 in Dublin, and at the age of eleven was sent to Harrow School, where he remained for five or six years. 142 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS A couple of anecdotes are told of him at this time. A gentleman having a remarkably long visage was one day riding by the school when he heard young Sheridan say : " That gentleman's face is longer than his life." Struck by the strangeness of the remark, he turned his horse, and requested the boy's meaning. " Sir," replied he, " I meant no offence in the world, but I have read in the Bible at school, that a man's life is but a span, and I am sure your face is double that length." The other is more of a retort which shows the child as father to the man, for it is quite in the character of many of Sheridan's later sajrings. The boy is said to have been made the butt of some of his schoolfellows, especially those who held the long traditional scorn of theatrical folks. One of the most troublesome and impertinent of these youths was the son of an eminent London physician. As he was once exercising his wit at the expense of Sheridan as being the son of a player, Sheridan promptly retorted : " 'Tis true my father lives by pleasing people ; but yours lives by killing them." in It was but natural, with his peculiar gifts and his im- mediate famUy associations, that Sheridan should turn his youthful attention to literature and the stage. A play foreshadowing The Critic was written by him in collabora- tion with a school friend while yet in his teens, and still remains in manuscript, and he wrote, with the fervour of the born liUeraieur imping his wings, many poems, sketches, letters and drafts of plays immediately after leaving Harrow. When he was about twenty his family removed to Bath and there he met the beautiful and much- wooed Elizabeth Ann Linley, a singer of sweet sixteen. SHERIDAN 143 Among Miss Linley's suitors was a pertinacious Major Mathews, to save her from whom Sheridan escorted her from Bath to a nunnery in France — going through the ceremony of marriage with her en route. On his return — the marriage was of course kept a profound secret — ^the young husband fought two duels with Major Mathews ; one in an ill-lighted room at the Bedford Coffee-house, and the other in the coimtry near Bath, on both occasions the weapons being swords. The second time Sheridan was badly wounded by his infuriated opponent. In 1773 he was openly married to Miss Linley. His wife had a few thousand pounds and with this Sheridan set i^p house in Orchard Street in a costly style and started life as a man of fashion, trusting to his genius to justify the daring step. A friend remonstrating with him on the instability of his means for supporting such an establishment he replied : " My dear friend, it is my means." And his future life showed that he was justified. He was but four and twenty when in 1775 his comedy of The Rivals was produced and almost at once won success. Eighteen months later, with his father-in-law and another, he bought half of Garrick's share in Drury Lane Theatre, and henceforward a large part of his life was bound up with the stage. Sheridan's share of the purchase money was ten thous- and pounds, and his friends and acquaintances were curious to know how he had succeeded in raising the sum. One of them went so far as to ask point-blank where the money came from, and the subsequent dialogue shows the drama- tist's appreciation of a humorous situation, and also how capital an actor he was in the jokes of his own devising. When the question was thus put bluntly by curiosity : " Your importunities have prevailed," at length replied Sheridan, with a convulsive effort, assuming an extra- 144 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS ordinary gravity of manner, and with a tremulous, sub- dued, half-suppressed voice, expressive of the greatest agitation ; " and your curiosity must be gratified, but I had hoped to have kept the secret confined within my own breast, and to have borne with its consuming fires even to the grave." " Mr Sheridan, I — I reaUy do not wish," exclaimed the other, but he was interrupted ere the sentence could be concluded by the stem theatrical air and gesture of Sheridan, as he advanced towards him. " Ay, sir, to the grave, where we might both have mouldered, and been forgotten." " Really, and seriously, Mr Sheridan, I have no desire to inquire into your secrets." " But you have forced it from me, and involved your- self in inextricable danger. Be the peril, therefore, on your own head, since you have obtained from me a con- fession which no tongue shotild utter or ear should hear, and which must necessarily involve yourself, by the keeping of my secret, in my guUt." " Mr Sheridan, this is really too serious a matter — I beg your pardon — I really must beg your pardon, and — good morning." " Stay, stay ; yet hold — ^let us see that we are not ob- served, that no eavesdropper catch the sound of our voices, or carry away the startling evidence of our daring." " What in the name of heaven, Mr Sheridan, doTyou allude to ? " " Heaven has nothing to do with the damning deed ! " The friend, paralysed, sank almost fainting in his chair, with the smell of brimstone in his nostrils and the con- figuration of Friar Bacon floating before his eyes. Sheri- dan approached the door of the apartment with slow SHERIDAN 145 and measured step, and, holding the handle, turned sud- denly round upon his bewildered friend. " Swear ! swear ! " he cried, " never to reveal my secret ! " " Oh, I never wiU, positively — ^upon my honour, never." < " I am satisfied. Well, then — " pausing for a moment, and assuming great anguish, with remorse depicted on his countenance, he continued, " since it must be so — I have discovered " — and elevating his voice to the highest pitch he roared out — " the philosopher's stone ! " saying which he darted out of the room, banging the door after him, and leaving his bewildered auditor to revolve the matter in his own mind, and digest it as he could. The cold facts of biography say that Sheridan con- tributed thirteen hundred pounds in cash towards his share of the purchase money and raised the rest on mortgage. Though his assumption of position by setting up a costly establishment without any assured income for its upkeep served no doubt to make him an important figure, it also served to make him always in monetary difficulties. He had something of his own Charles Surface's airy irrespon- sibility where money was concerned, and a number of stories are recorded of him in this connexion. IV It is not possible to give here more than a selection from the many anecdotes of Sheridan connected with the theatre. During his management of Drury Lane, Thomas Holcroft, author of The Road to Ruin, had produced a play which, he had said, on offering it to Covent Garden, would reduce old Drury to nothing but " a splendid ruin." 146 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS Later he had occasion to offer a play to Sheridan for Drury Lane, when the manager said : " Come, come, Holcroft, it would be rather too bad to make me the instrument of accomplishing your own prediction." Two other play- wrights came off no better. One of them, a gentleman of fashion, having written a tragedy sent it in all con- fidence to Drury Lane. Sheridan looked at it and put it on one side. In a few days the author called. " Well, now, my dear Sheridan," said he, " what do you think of it ? My friend Cumberland has promised me a prologue ; and I dare say, for the interest of the theatre, you wiU have no objection to supply me with an epilogue." " Trust me, my dear sir," replied Sheridan significantly, " it wUl never come to that, depend on't." " Monk " Lewis, an author somewhat vain of his vogue, having produced a play called The Castle Spectre, said, apropos of some friendly dispute : " Sheridan, I will make you a large bet." " What is it ? " asked the other eagerly, being one who was ever ready for the excitement of a wager. " AU the profits of The Castle Spectre," said, Lewis. " I wUl tell you what," retorted Sheridan, " I will make you a very small one— what it is worth." When it was suggested by an ^miring friend that he should try his hand at a comedy Sheridan replied that there were already plenty of " comedies of that class " and he did not propose adding to their number. When Lord Thurlow, attending a performance of Pizarro, was observed to be fast asleep during RoUa's celebrated address to the Peruvians, " Poor fellow," said Sheridan, " I suppose that he fancies he's on the Bench." Michael Kelly, in his " Reminiscences," tells how when Kemble and Sheridan were drinking together one evening the former complained of the want of novelty at Drury Lane, and said that he felt uneasy as to the future of the theatre. " My dear Kemble," said Sheridan, " don't talk SHERIDAN 147 of grievances now." But Kemble still kept on, saying : " Jndeed, we must seek for novelty, or the theatre will sink — ^novelty, and novelty alone, can prop it." " Then," said Sheridan, with a smUe, " if you want novelty, act Hamlet — and have music played between your pauses." The same anecdotist describes his own appearance in the character of an Irishman in an opera at Drury Lane. " My friend Johnstone took great pains to instruct me in the brogue, but I did not feel quite up to the mark ; and, after all, it seems my vernacular phraseology was not the most perfect ; for when the opera was over, Sheridan came into the green-room and said, " Bravo ! Kelly ; very well, indeed ; upon my honour I never before heard you speak such good English in all my life." Describing the cavern scene of Coleridge's Remorse as it was produced at Drury Lane, Sheridan declared it was " drip, drip, drip — ^nothing but dripping." More cutting was his immediate reply when asked which performer he liked best in a certain piece, " The prompter, for I saw less and heard riiore of him than anyone else." When Drury Lane Theatre was destroyed by fire in February 1809 Sheridan heard of the outbreak when in the House of Commons. He hastened to the scene and, it is said, showed great fortitude at witnessing the destruction of his property. He sat at the Piazza Coffee-house taking some refreshment ; and on a friend remarking how calmly he bore the blow, Sheridan quietly replied that surely a man might be allowed to take a glass of wine by his own fireside ! Twice did Sheridan make a point over a Drury Lane afterpiece called The Caravan, in which a performing dog carried off the chief honours. After the first successful performance he suddenly entered the green-room, as it was supposed, to congratulate the author. " Where is he ? 148 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS Where is my guardian angel ? " he anxiously inquired. " Here I am," answered the gratified author. " Pooh ! " exclaimed Sheridan, " I don't mean you, I mean the dog." Later on, when he reached the theatre, Dignum, who played in the piece, met him with a woeful countenance, saying : " Sir, there is no guarding against illness ; it is truly lamentable to stop the run of a successful piece like this, but really " " Really what ? " cried Sheridan. " I am so unwell that I cannot go on longer than to-night." " You ! " exclaimed Sheridan, " my good feUow, you terri- fied me. I thought you were going to say that the dog was taken ill." Summing up the life of a theatrical manager Sheridan indulged in that extravagant exaggeration which is a characteristic of his humour, as exemplified in many stories. Like Sydney Smith he could concentrate wit into the brevity of a sentence, or could indulge in a kind of humor- ous verbosity which gained in effect from its mere flow of words. " The life of a manager of a theatre," he said, " was like the life of the ordinary at Newgate — a constant superintendence of executions. The number of authors whom he was forced to extinguish was a perpetual literary massacre that made St Bartholomew's altogether shrink in comparison. Play-writing, singly, accounted for the employment of that immense multitude who drain away obscure years beside the inkstand, and haunt the streets with iron-moulded visages, and study-coloured clothes. It singly accounted for the rise of paper, which had ex- hausted the rags of England and Scotland, and had almost stripped off the last covering of Ireland. He had counted plays untU calculation sank under the number ; and every rejected play of them all seemed like the clothes of a Spanish beggar, to turn into a living, restless, merciless, indefatigable progeny." SHERIDAN 149 When Sheridan was visiting Brighton, Fox, the manager of the theatre there, was showing him over the building. " There, Mr Sheridan," said he — a jack of all trades and master of none — " I built and painted all these boxes, and I painted all these scenes." " Did you, indeed ? " said Sheridan, looking around him, " well, I should not, I am sure, have known that you were a fox by your brush." Sheridan was not only a master of verbal play, but was apparently sometimes the inspirer of such, for Michael Angelo Taylor records : " My best pun was that which I made to Sheridan, who married a Miss Ogle. We were supping together at the Shakespeare, when, the conversation turning on Garrick, I asked him which of his performances he thought the best. ' Oh,' said he, ' the Lear, the Lear.' ' No wonder,' said I, ' you were fond of a leer when you married an Ogle.' " It was in 1780 — The Rivals of 1775 and The School for Scandal of 1777 had established his dramatic fame — ^that Sheridan entered upon political life, becoming Member of Parliament for Stafford as a staunch supporter of Charles James Fox, and therefore of the Prince of Wales' party. His first speech in the House is said to have been to defend himself against a charge of bribery — ^no easy matter if the chroniclers are true who say that he paid the burgesses of the town five guineas a-piece, and dinners and ale to the non-voters for the purpose of securing their applause. He soon shone in debate owing to the irresistibly humorous way he had of putting things, and despite his supreme gift of ridicule he had the distinction of being one of the few political leaders who never challenged to a duel. He early filled minor posts in the Ministry, and in 1787 added greatly 150 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS to his fame by his wonderfxil oratory at the impeachment of Warren Hastings. In an age of oratory, he was indeed by some regarded as the greatest orator. The secession of Burke to a certain extent broke up the Whig party, and the death of Fox in 1806 left Sheridan a more or less independent figure. He succeeded Fox in the representation of Westminster — ^that liveliest of the constituencies a century ago — but was defeated in the following year and sat for Ilchester, his expenses, it is said, being paid by the Prince Regait, whose mouthpiece he was supposed to be in the Commons. Innumerable are the stories told of Sheridan as a politi- cian, stories illustrating both his wit and his humour, his readiness in the flash of the one, or the irradiation of the other. On being asked how it was that he so soon estab- lished himself as an orator in the House, Sheridan said : " Why, sir, it was easily effected. After I had been in St Stephen's Chapel a few days I found that four-fifths of the House were composed of country squires and great fools ; my first effort, therefore, was by a lively sally or an ironical remark to make them laugh ; that laugh effaced the recol- lection of what had been lurged in opposition to my view of the subject from their stupid pates, and then I whipped in an argument, and had all the way clear before me." During the Westminster election contest one of the voters, annoyed at the tactics of some of Sheridan's sup- porters, called out to the candidate that he should with- draw his countenance from him. " Take it away at once, take it away at once ! " cried Sheridan, " it is the most villainous-looking countenance I ever beheld." Towards the close of the struggle, when it was seen that all the efforts of his friends would fail to secure his return, Sheridan bore the defeat with good humour. A sailor, anxious to view the proceedings, had climbed one of the supports in front SHERIDAN 151 of the hustings. As Sheridan began his speech his eye fell upon the tar aloft, and he at once turned the incident to ludicrous account by saying that had he had but five hundred voters as upright as the perpendicular gentleman before him, they would yet place him where he was — at the head of the pole ! When the election was over and Lord Cochrane duly returned, that nobleman sent a message saying that he hoped his opponent would drown the memory of differences in a friendly bottle. " With all my heart," said Sheridan, " and will thank his Lordship to make it a Scotch pint." At one of the earlier contests for Westminster, when PauU was his opponent, Sheridan won a vote by strange means. He was journeying to town in a public coach that he might start upon his canvass, when he found that his two companions were Westminster electors. In the course of conversation one of them asked the other for whom he intended to vote. " For Paull certainly," came the unhesitating reply, " for though I think him but a shabby sort of a feUow, I would vote for anyone rather than for that rascal Sheridan ! " "Do you know Sheridan ? " asked the other. " Not I, sir ; nor should I wish to know him." The conversation dropped here, but when the party alighted for breakfast Sheridan called the other gentleman aside, and said : " Pray, who is that very agreeable friend of yours ? He is one of the pleasantest fellows I ever met with, and should be glad to know his name." " His name is Mr Richard Wilson ; he is an eminent lawyer, and resides in Lincoln's Inn Fields." Breakfast over, the party resumed their seats in the coach. Sheridan soon turned the talk to law. " It is," he said, " a fine profession. Men may rise from it to the highest eminence in the State ; and it gives vast scope to the display of talent ; many of the most virtuous and noble 152 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS characters recorded in our history have been lawyers ; I am sorry, however, to add, that some of the greatest rascals have also been lawyers ; but of all the rascals of lawyers I ever heard of, the greatest is one Wilson, who lives in Lincoln's Inn Fields." " I am Mr Wilson, sir ! " said that gentleman. " And I am Mr Sheridan," was the reply. The jest was instantly seen ; they shook hands, and instead of voting against the facetious orator the lawyer exerted himself warmly in promoting his election. One or two of Sheridan's things said in the House of Commons, of which he remained a member for over thirty years, must be given. Very happy was his crushing reply to Dundas, " The right honourable gentleman is indebted to his memory for his jests, and to his imagination for his facts." A long-winded member having paused in the midst of a tedious harangue to take a glass of water, Sheridan immediately rose to a point of order. Everybody won- dered what the point of order could be. " What is it ? " asked the Speaker. " I think, sir," said Sheridan, with great seriousness, " that it is out of order for a windmill to go by water." On another occasion he cleverly trapped a noisy member who had got into the habit of interrupting every speaker with cries of " Hear ! Hear ! " Sheridan took an oppor- tunity to allude to a weU-known political character of the times, whom he represented as a person who wished to play the rogue but had only sense enough to play the fool. " Where," he exclaimed, in emphatic continuation, " where shall we find a more foolish knave or a more knavish fool than this ? " " Hear ! hear ! " was instantly shouted from the usual seat. The wit bowed, thanked the gentle- man for his ready reply to the question, and sat down SHERIDAN 153 amidst convulsions of laughter, in which it may be believed the unfortunate victim did not join. Lord Belgrave having concluded a speech, and as he thought clinched his argumentwith a longGreek quotation, Sheridan when he rose to reply admitted the force of the quotation so far as it went ; " but," said he, " had the noble lord proceeded a little further, and completed the passage, he would have seen that it applied the other way." He {hen delivered ore rotunda something which had all the ais, ois, ous, kon and kos that give the world assurance of a Greek quotation ; upon which Lord Belgrave very promptly and handsomely complimented the honourable member on his readiness of recollection, and frankly admitted that the continuation of the passage had the tendency ascribed to it by Mr Sheridan, and that he had overlooked it at the moment when he gave his quotation. On the adjournment of the House, Fox, who rather piqued himself upon his knowledge of Greek, went up to Sheridan saymg, " Sheridan, how came you to be so ready with that passage ? It certainly was as you say, but I was not aware of it before you spoke." Sheridan had indeed succeeded in hoaxing the House, for his " quotation " was quite impromptu — and entirely innocent of Greek.^ 1 An earlier amusing instance of the use of the classics in the House of Commons may be given. In a debate on the motion for the impeachment of Sir Robert Walpole in 1741 that minister quoted a verse from Horace. His great rival, Pulteney (after- wards Earl of Batb), rose and remarked that the right honourable gentleman's Latin and logic were aUke inaccurate. Walpole denied it — hurt perhaps rather by the slur on his Latin than on his logic — and a bet of a guinea was made across the floor of the House. The matter was referred to the clerk at the table, a noted scholar, and he decided against Walpole. The guinea was handed to Pulteney and finally found its way to the British Museum with the following inscription by the triumphant winner : — ' ■ This guinea I desire 154 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS When Sheridan's colleagues had brought in an extremely unpopular measure, and been defeated on it, he said that he had often heard of people knocking out their brains against a wall, but never before knew of anyone building a wall expressly for the purpose. When new^ possibilities of taxation were being discussed, someone suggested a tax on milestones ! Sheridan dis- missed the proposal as unconstitutional — as they were a race that could not meet to remonstrate. Such a sugges- tion was, of course, not meant to be taken seriously, but a member actually proposed in the House that a tax might well be levied upon tombstones, and in doing so declared it to be a tax that could meet with no objection. He had reckoned without Sheridan, who replied " that the only reason why the proposed tax could not be objected to was, because those out of whose property it was to be paid would know nothing of the matter, as they must be dead before the demand could be made ; but then, after all, who knows but that it may not be rendered unpopular in being represented as a tax upon persons who, having paid the debt of nature, must prove that they have done so by having the receipt engraved upon their tombs." Burke's melodramatic flinging of the dagger on the floor of the House of Commons was a farcical event that pro- duced nothing but a smothered laugh and a joke from Sheridan, " the gentleman has brought us the knife, but where is the fork ? " may be kept as an heirloom. It was won of Sir Robert Walpole in the House ; he asserting the verse in Horace to be ' Nulh pallescere Culpae ' whereas I laid the wager of a guinea that it was ' NuUi pallescere culpa.' I told him I could take the money without blush on my side, but believed it was the only money he ever gave in the House of Commons where the giver and receiver ought not equally to blush. This guinea I hope will prove to my posterity the use of knowing Latin, and encourage them in their learning." SHERIDAN 155 During the trial of Warren Hastings, Sheridan was making one of his speeches when, having observed Gibbon among the audience, he took occasion to refer to " the luminous author of the ' Decline and Fall.' " A friend afterwards reproached him for flattering the historian. " Why, what did I say of him ? " asked Sheridan. " You called him the luminous author of the ' Decline and Fall.' " " Luminous ! " repeated Sheridan, " oh ! of course I meant voluminous." Lord Henry Petty having projected a tax on iron, some- one at Brookes's was sajdng that there was so much opposition to it that it would be better to raise the necessary sum from a tax on coals." " Hold ! my dear fellow," broke in Sheridan, " that would be going from the frying pan to the fire with a vengeance." When it was suggested that Sheridan's son should enter Parliament he was asked which side he would take. The young man replied that he would vote with those who had the most to offer him, that he should wear on his forehead a label " To let." " Do, Tom," commented his father, " and write underneath those words' unfurnished.' " VI The gift of humour which took the form of bantering exaggeration was peculiarly Sheridan's, and was not infrequently used by him in Parliament with considerable effect. Thus, he happily illustrated the defects of a bill to remedy the defects of bills already in being, by com- paring it to the plan of a simple but very ingeniousjmoral tale, that had often afforded him amusement in his early days, under the|title of " The House that Jack Built." First, then, comes in a bill, imposing a tax, and then 156 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS comes in a bill to amend that bill for imposing a tax ; next a biU to remedy the defects of a bill for explaining the bill that amended the bill for imposing a tax ; and so on ad, infinitum." I, On the same theme he compared a tax bill to a ship built in a dockyard, which was found to be defective every voyage, and consequently was obliged to undergo a new repair ; first it was to be caulked, then to be new planked, then to be new ribbed, then again to be covered ; then, after all these expensive alterations, the vessel was obliged to be broken up and rebuilt. A delightful instance of this humour is to be seen in Sheridan's whimsical account of his boon-companion Joseph Richardson's visit to Bognor with hmi. Richard- son, who had set his mind upon the trip especially because Lord Thurlow was staying at Bognor, said " nothing can be more delightful, what with my favourite diversion of sailing — ^my enjojmient of walking on the sand — the pleasure of arguing with Lord Thurlow, and taking my snuff by the seaside I shall be in my glory." Such was the anticipation, now for Sheridan's account of realization : " Well, down he went, full of anticipated joys. The first day, in stepping into the boat to go sailing, he tumbled down, and sprained his ankle, and was obliged to be carried into his lodgings, which had no view of the sea ; the following morning he sent for a barber to shave him, but there being no professional barber nearer than Chichester, he was forced to put up with a fisherman, who volunteered to officiate and cut him severely just under the nose, which entirely prevented his taking snuff, and the same day at breakfast, eating prawns too hastily, he swallowed the head of one, horns and all, which stuck in his throat, and produced such pain and inflammation, that his medical advisers would not allow him to speak for three days. So SHERIDAN 157 thus ended in four and twenty hours, his walking — ^his sailing — ^his snuff-taking — ^and his arguments." VII In 1812 Sheridan had quarrelled with the Prince Regent and failed to secure election for Stafford — ^he had not the necessary money to buy the seat, nor was he able to raise it. This was the beginning of the pitiable end. As a member of Parliament he had been more or less secure from his creditors, but the last four years of his life, broken in fortune and in health, was a sad climax to a brilliant career. The ostentatious display, the hard drinking, the rash betting of the time were too much for the dramatist's fortune and physique. His death, accelerated by distress, took place on 7th July 1816. A few weeks earlier a writer in one of the papers had drawn attention to Sheridan's state and called for " Life and Succour against Westminster Abbey and a Funeral." Succour came too late, and the man who died with the bailiffs at his door was accorded " a funeral of unsurpassed ostentation," and buried in the Abbey. Of the character of Sheridan as a man, of his political position, his treatment as " the scapegoat of the Whigs," of his achievements in dramatic literature, of the richness of his oratory, the charm of his personality it is not neces- sary here to speak. The story has been newly told at length in two capital volumes by Mr Walter Sichel, who gives an admirable summing-up of his witty conversation, with which we are here chiefly concerned. " In his youth it detained Lady Cork for two months at Chatsworth from a house awaiting her at Bath. In his age it held Rogers and Bjrron spellbound from six in the evening till one in the morning. It brought up Thackeray' s 158 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS witty and beautiful grandmother night after ni^ht to the Westminster house of her uncle, Peter Moore, for the mere pleasure of hearing him. It disarmed his opponents, it propitiated men so opposed to each other as Dundas and WUberforce. It softened Sheridan's breach with the fastidious Windham. It conciliated the commonplace George Rose who once boasted that he had christened a son William in honour of Pitt, and was told by Sheridan that a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. For a long space (to use Burke's word) it ' dulcified ' Biurke's righteous asperity." ^ Some of his remarks, if rightly attributed to him, must have called for quick appreciation of their wit to avoid their being taken as offence. Meeting two of the royal dukes in St James's Street, one of them hailed him, " I say, Sherry, we have just been discussing whether you are a greater fool or rogue. What is your own opinion, my boy ? " Sheridan, having bowed and smiled at the com- pliment, took each of them by an arm, and instantly re- plied : " Why, 'faith, your Royal Highness, I believe I am between both." The Prince Regent was regarded as taking great credit to himself for various public occurrences, as if they had been directed by his skill or foreseen by his sagacity. After expatiating on this trait of his royal friend's character Sheridan added, " but what his Royal Highness more par- ticularly prides himself upon, is the late excellent harvest." On the Prince entering the Thatched House Club and calling for a drink, Sheridan at once gave this impromptu : " The Prince came in, and said 'twas cold. Then took a mighty rummer, When swallow after swallow came. And then he swore 'twas summer." '"Sheridan." By Walter Sichel. 1909. i.87. SHERIDAN 159 It was, as has been seen, in happy ridicule that Sheridan's humour was frequently manifested. The Prince having ex- patiated on the beauty of the opinion that the reason why the bosom of a beautiful woman possesses such a fascinating effect on man is because he derived from that source the first pleasurable sensations of his infancy Sheridan readily reduced the argument to absurdity with : " Such chil- dren, then, as are brought up by hand must needs be indebted for similar sensations to a very different object ; and yet, I believe, no man has ever felt any intense emo- tions of amatory delight at beholding a faf-spoon ! " When Law (afterwards Lord EUenborough) had to cross-examine Sheridan he began- : " Pray, Mr Sheridan, do answer my questions without point or epigram." " You say true, Mr Law," retorted he. " Your questions are without point or epigram." Meeting Sheridan Beau BrummeU said : " My brain is swimming, Sherry, with being up all night ; how can I cure it ? " " You have mistaken your complaint," retorted Sheridan, " there can be no swimming in a caput moriuum." On another occasion, too, he scored off the Beau, but rather with bluntness than the sharpness of wit. He had met BrummeU in Fleet Street and the Beau expressed his horror at being found east of Temple Bar. Sheridan professed, too, that meeting him there was almost incred- ible. " You ! come from the east ! " he exclaimed, " im- possible ! " " Why, my de-ar sa-ar ? " drawled BrummeU. ' ' Because the wise men came from the East, ' ' was Sheridan' s reply. " So then, sa-ar," demanded the other, " you think me a fool ? " " By no means," said Sheridan ; " I know you to be one." Very happy was this epigram in reply to Lord Erskine who, in a crowded company, had declared that " a wife i6o A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS was only a tin canister tied to one's tail." Sheridan, appropriately handed the lines to Lady Erskine : " Lord Erskine J at women presuming to raU, Calls a wife ' a tin canister tied to one's tail 1 ' And the fair Lady Anne while the subject he carries on, Seems htirt at his Lordship's degrading comparison : But wherefore degrading ? Considered aright — A canister's polished, and useful, and bright. And should dirt its original purity hide, That's the fault of the puppy to whom it is tied."- Lord Lauderdale saying he had just heard an excellent joke, which he would repeat, Sheridan stopped him with : " Pray don't, my dear Lauderdale ; in your mouth a joke is no laughing matter." Of an unscrupulous opponent he said, " I can laugh at his malice — but not at his wit." A certain doctor notorious for his niggardliness was prevailed upon to attend a charity sermon in Westminster Abbey. After the sermon the plate was handed round. Said Fox, who was present with Sheridan : " The doctor has absolutely given his pound." " Then," said Sheridan, " he must think that he is going to die." " Pooh ! " replied Fox, " even Judas threw away twice the money." " Yes — ^but how long was it before he was hanged ? " added Sheridan. Many of the stories remembered about Sheridan, or that have been fastened upon him, have to do with his continuous state of indebtedness. He is reported to have said : " I pay my debts chronologically, and the first debt I mean to pay is the debt of nature." He was a public man for ever vexed by the eternal want of pence. MTaen told that somebody had traced the lost tribes of Israel he said that he was glad to hear it, as he had nearly exhausted all the others. He appears to have been ready to jest again and again over his monetary difficulties. At one time a man SHERIDAN i6i named Hanson was a rather heavy creditor, and so was Gunter the confectioner, for a smaller amount. The latter had sent in his bill demanding immediate payment on the very morning that Hanson called for the settlement of his account. Gunter's bill lay upon the table. Hanson was pressing. Sheridan was apologetic. " I must have my account settled," said the tradesman ; " promises are not payment, and I cannot wait any longer." " Well, my dear sir," came the quiet reply, " if you can show me how to settle it I shall most cheerfully comply with your wishes." " Me show you ! " retorted Hanson, " how am I to know your resources?" "You know Gunter?" said Sheridan; " perhaps you wiU have no objection to take his bill ? " " Not at aJl ; I know Gunter to be a good safe man." " Well then," handing over the paper as he spoke, " there's his bin — ^take it, make what use you can of it, and when you have done with it, I must beg of you to return it — receipted," and bowing politely he left the bewildered Hanson to the acceptance or rejection of the joke as might best suit him. One day a creditor came into Sheridan's room for a bill, and found him seated before a table on which were two or three himdred pounds in gold and notes. " It's no use looking at that, my good fellow," said Sheridan, " that is all bespoken for debts of honour." " Very well," replied the tradesman, tearing up his security and throwing it in the fire, " now mine is a debt of honour." " So it is, and must be paid at once," said Sheridan, handing over the money. Two or three anecdotes show how bravely he jested up to the end. Seated at the window of his room not long be- fore his death, on seeing a hearse go by he remarked, " Ah, that is the carriage — after all ! " When he lay upon his death-bed the doctor thought that, as a forlorn hope, a i62 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS \ certain operation might be performed and inquired of the patient, " Have you ever undergone an operation, Mr Sheridan ? " " Yes," replied the patient, his drollery un- repressed by sickness, " when sitting for my portrait — or to have my hair cut." One night Sheridan was found in the street by a watch- man, fuddled, bewildered and almost insensible. " Who are you, sir ? " demanded the watchman. No reply. " What's your name ? " A hiccough the only response. " What's your name ? " In a slow, deliberate and impas- sive tone came the answer : " Wilber force ! " Byron com- ments on this : " Is not that Sherry all over ? — and, to my mind, excellent. Poor fellow ! his very dregs are better than the first sprightly runnings of others." That Sheridan's son inherited something of his father's humour several stories testify. When his father recom- mended him to take a wife he bluntly answered : ' ' Whose ? ' ' Sheridan was anxious that Tom should marry a woman of fortune, but Tom had set his affections elsewhere and would not listen to his father's expostulations. Sheridan at length said : " Tom, if you marry Caroline Callander, I'll cut you off with a shilling." " Then, sir, you must borrow it," came the answer. Even Sheridan had at times the tables turned on him. When he had taken a new house he happened to meet Lord Guildford, to whom he mentioned his change of residence, and also announced a change in his own habits, " Now, my lord, everything is carried on in my house with the greatest regularity — everything in short goes like clock- work." " Ah ! " replied Lord Guildford meaningly, " tick, tick, tick, I suppose." CHAPTER XI WITS IN SOCIETY " Social wit which, never kindling strife, Blazed in the small sweet courtesies of life." PERHAPS the first recognized " Society Wit "—the man welcomed everywhere for his readiness in con- versation, his capacity as an anecdotist — was George Augustus Selwyn. Though for many years a member of ParUament, and holder of various sinecure offices, it is only as society wit that his memory survives, and that perhaps largely because of the extent to which he is mentioned and quoted in the correspondence of Horace Walpole. Born in 1719 Selwyn was educated, with Walpole and Gray, at Eton and went thence to Oxford, where, to avoid being expelled, he removed his name from the college books. He was accused of having insulted the Christian religion by using a chalice at a wine-party, his explanation being that it was merely done as a satire on the doctrines taught by the Church of Rome. At the age of twenty-eight he entered Parliament, and though he remained a member for upwards of thirty years it was a silent one, indeed it is recorded that when he was in the House " he was nearly always asleep, except when taking part in a division." He was a popular member of the fashionable clubs, and a game- ster on whom Fortune seems to have smiled. One of the 163 i64 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS best-remembered traits of his character is said to have been his fondness for attending executions, though this was declared by some of his friends to be greatly exagger- ated. Selwjm seems to have been one of those utterers of good things who cotild remain impassive while making the re- marks that set the table in a roar. Walpole says that the demureness of the speaker gave an added zest to the witticism. The writer of the life of Selw57n in The Dic- tionary of National Biography says that " the savour of such of his jests as survive has long been lost," which is rather an illustration of the fact that a jest's prosperity depends upon someone else as well as its utterer. When the Scotch lords were tried after the 1745 Stuart rising, Selwyn said, on seeing " the hatchet-faced " Mr Bethel looking wistfully at the prisoners : " What a shame it is to turn his face to the prisoners till they are condemned " — the allusion being to the custom of carrying the axe with its edge towards men condemned for treason, instead of from them as before condemnation. When Lord North was married in the summer of 175 1 somebody said that it was very hot weather in which to marry so fat a bride. " Oh ! " said Selwyn, " she was kept in ice for three days before." Selwyn was blamed by some ladies for going to see Lord Lovat's execution, and asked how he could be such a barbarian as to see the head cut off. " Nay," said he, " if that was such a crime, I am sure that I have made amends, for I went to see it sewn on again." When George the Third came to the throne, Walpole and Selwyn were discussing the state of affairs when the former remarked : " There is nothing new under the sun." " No," added Selwyn, " nor under the grandson." Selwyn and Charles Townsend had been having a wit GEORGE SELWYN FROM A PORTRAIT BY SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS, IN THE POSSESSION OF THE EARL OF KOSEBtRY WITS IN SOCIETY 165 combat all evening in which the former came off victor. Townsend took his friend in his carriage as far as White's, where he dropped him. " Remember, Charles," said Selwyn, as he descended, " this is the first set-down you have given me to-day." Someone of the same name as Charles James Fox having been hanged at Tyburn, Fox asked Selw}^ if he had attended the execution. " No," replied he dryly, " I make a point of never attending rehearsals." This widely accepted view of Selwyn's morbidity gave his friends opportunities of being pleasant at his expense. When Lord Holland was ill he was told that the wit had called to inquire after him. " If Mr Selwyn calls again," said the sick man, " show him into my room. If I am alive I shall be glad to see him ; if I am dead I am sure he will be glad to see me." On there being a proposal to get up a subscription for the benefit of Fox someone said that as it was a matter of delicacy, " how would Fox take it." " Take it ! " exclaimed Selwyn, " why, quarterly, to be sure." Selwyn, as befitted a society wit, was a member of the leading clubs, and in the licence permitted so popular a person was by no means always careful to eliminate rudeness from his wit. Some of the clubs were not over- exclusive, and at Brookes's there was a Sir Robert Mack- reth, who had been for several years a waiter at the Cocoa Tree, had obtained a considerable fortune by marriage and had gained great notoriety as a moneylender and by duping a young nobleman out of some thousands of pounds. One evening at Brookes's someone referred to the Cocoa Tree being in the market, on which Mackreth jestingly an- nounced his intention of buying it and changing its name to Bob's Coffee-house. " Right," said Selwyn, " it will be Bob without and Robbin' within." i66 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS To the lady of a knight — her father having been a pawnbroker and usurer — he was yet more severe. She had shown him through a number of gaudy apartments, decorated with still more gaudy pictures, and at last con- ducted him to a still more gorgeous apartment where there were none. " Here," said she, " I intend to hang up my family." " I thought," commented Selwyn, " they had been hanged long since." Much pestered for money by merry-making chimney- sweepers on May Day, Selwjm made a low bow to the sooty company, saying : " Gentlemen, I have often heard of the majesty of the people, I presume your highnesses are in Court mourning." Thus runs the version of Lord Pem- broke, who was apparently an ear-witness. Horace Walpole gives Selwyn's words as " We have heard so much lately of the majesty of the people, that I suppose they are taken for the princes of the people, and this is Collar-day," in allusion to the May Day decorations of the sweeps. " George," says Walpole, " never thinks but d la tete trancMe. He came to town t'other day to have a tooth drawn ; and told the man that he would drop his handker- chief for the signal," in accordance with the time-honoured habit of stage executions. Selwyn had readiness of humour as well as wit, and is said to have been fond of it in its lowest form of hoaxing. He was dining with the Mayor and Corporation of Gloucester, in 1758, when news arrived of the failure of the British expedition to take Rochfort. The Mayor turning to their guest said : " You, sir, who are in the ministerial secrets, can no doubt inform us of the cause of this misfortune ? " SelwjTn, who was of course quite ignorant of the matter, instantly said, " I will tell you, in confidence, the reason, Mr Mayor. The fact is, that the scaling ladders prepared for the occasion were found on trial to be too short ! " WITS IN SOCIETY 167 Meeting a pretentious personage, the son of a stable- keeper, who had been appointed a Commissioner of Taxes by the influence of the famous Duke of Queensberry, and who was giving himself ridiculous airs at Brookes's, " So, Mr Commissioner, you have been installed, have you ? " said Selwyn. " Yes, sir," replied the other, " and without taking a single step in the matter." " I believe you, sir," rejoined Selwyn ; " reptiles can neither walk nor take steps ; nature ordained them to creep." Watching the play at White's, Selwyn observed the Postmaster-General (Sir L. Fawkener) losing heavily at piquet, and pointing to his successful opponent said, " See how he is robbing the mail." Seeing Ponsonby, the Speaker, at the hazard-table at Newmarket tossing about the bank bills he said to a companion : " Look how easily the Speaker passes the money bills." A friend meeting Selwyn asked : " How does your new horse answer ? " "I really don't know," said he, " for I . have never asked him a question." When a man of fashion who had borrowed large sums of money fled to the Continent to avoid his creditors Selwyn said : " It is a pass-over that will not be much relished by the Jews." When Burke first entered the House of Commons, his speaking served so regularly to empty the chamber that he got nicknamed " the dinner-bell." A nobleman meeting Selwyn as he was quitting the Commons said : " What, is the House up ? " " No," replied the other wearily, " but Burke is." Much amusement having been caused by the report that Sir Joshua Rejmolds was to stand for Parliament, Selw}^! said : " He is not to be laughed at ; he may very well be elected, for Sir Joshua is the ablest man I know on a canvas." i68 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS A humorous story that has been presented in many shapes is said to have been told by Selwyn in the following form. It is, however, probably much older : — Two friends, who had not seen each other for a long time, met one day by accident. " How do you do ? " says one. " So, so," rephes the other, " and yet I was married since you and I were together." " Tliat is very good news." " Not very good — for it was my lot to choose a terma- gant." "It is a pity." " I hardly think so, for she brought me two thousand poimds." " Well, there is comfort." " Not so much — for with her fortune I bought a number of sheep, and they are all dead of the rot." " That is indeed distressing." " Not so distressing as you may imagine — ^for by the sale of their skins I got more than the sheep cost me." " In that case you are indemnified." " By no means — ^for my house and all my money has been destroyed by fire." " Alas ! this was a dreadful misforttme." " Faith, not so dreadful — for my termagant wife and my house were burnt together." II Joseph Jekyll, who was bom about 1753, became as well known in his time as Selwyn as diner-out and wit. He was contributor of epigrams and verses to the journals, a Member of Parliament for Calne from 1787 until 1816, WITS IN SOCIETY 169 solicitor to the Prince of Wales in 1805 and later a Com- missioner in Lunacy and Master in Chancery. There was considerable objection to the final appointment, in 181 5, but the story runs that the Prince Regent was determined upon it and at length overcame Lord Eldon's objections by forcing his way into the Lord Chancellor's bedroom and exclaiming : " How I do pity Lady Eldon — she will never see you again, for here I remain until you promise to make Jekyll a Master in Chancery ! " Jekyll made such a reputation by his jeux d'esprits that the authors of " The Rolliad " did not spare him in their attacks on all who favoured Pitt : " Ranging with fell virtu his poisonous tribes Of embryo sneers and animalcule gibes. Here insect puns their feeble wings expand. To speed in httle flights their lord's commands, There in their paper chrysahs he sees Specks of bon mots and eggs of repartees."' Political antipathy of course dictated these terms, for Jekyll's wit was by no means the little thing it was here made out to be. Some of his retorts and remarks were admirable. Some have lost their savour owing to the lapse of time and call for such annotation as would make them now seem laboured, others, it must be admitted, are but indifferent puns. The following, noted in Crabb Robinson's " Diary " in 1818, would now come in the second category : — " this year there were great changes in the law courts. Of the judicial promotions Jekyll said that they came by titles very different — C. J. Abbott by descent, J. Best by intrusion, and Richardson by the operation of law. The wit of the first two is pungent ; the last a deserved com- pliment." Seeing a squirrel in a revolving cage in a barrister's 170 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS chambers he said : " Ah ! poor devil, he's going the Home Circuit." Being asked why he no longer spoke to a lawyer of the name of Peat he answered : " Because I choose to give up his acquaintance ; I have common of Turbary, and have a right to cut Peat." Once more he played neatly on a man's name. An attorney named Else approached him sa57ing indignantly : " Sir, I hear you have called me a pettifogging scoundrel. Have you done so, sir ? " " No, sir," replied Jekyll imperturbably ; " I never said you were a petti- fogger or a scoundrel, but I did say you were little Else." Describing Lady Cork as she appeared at a party wearing an enormous plume he said : " She was exactly like a shuttlecock — all Cork and feathers." The inhospitality of the Duke of Richmond — ^the only cool place in his house was said to be the kitchen — ^was a frequent subject for his wits, and inspired Jekyll with two good mots. A friend who had visited the Duke said that he had been in the kitchen, where he saw the spit shining as brightly as though it had never been used. " Why do you mention his spit ? " commented Jekyll ; " you must know that nothing turns upon that." Referring to the same trait of the same nobleman on another occasion Jekyll said : " It is Lent all the year round in his kitchen, emd Passion week in the parlour." He appears to have had a similar idea of Lord Eldon's kitchen, judging by the neat epigram which he made on hearing the word lien pro- nounced as " lion " by Eldon and as " lean " by Sir Arthur Pigot : " Sir Arthur, Sir Arthur, why, what do you mean By saying the Chancellor's lion is lean ? Do you think that his kitchen's so bad as all that. That nothing within it will ever get fat." The impromptu epigram seems to have been one of the WITS IN SOCIETY 171 most characteristic expressions of Jekyll's wit. On observing a bustling, prosy serjeant come into court he at once wrote : " Behold the serjeant, full of fire, Long shaU his hearers rue it His purple garments came from Tyre, His arguments go to it." No less happy was his pun on an old lady who was brought forward as a witness to prove a certain tender having been made. " Garrow, forbear 1 that tough old jade Can never prove a tender maid."- Neatly, too, did he vary an old jest against the medical profession : " One doctor single like the scuUer plies. The patient struggles and by inches dies ; But two physicians, like a pair of oars. Waft him right smoothly to the Stygian shores." When it was reported in the House of Commons that the Emperor of China had given a fairly direct hint to Lord Macartney that he had better hasten his departure, as the rainy season was coming on, Jekyll wrote the following impromptu : — " The sage Chian-ti Has looked in the sky. And he says we shall soon have wet weather ; So I think, my good fellows. As you've no umbrellas You'd better go home dry together." These lines passed from hand to hand and a message was sent across from the Government benches begging Jekyll — one of the Opposition — for the rest of the verses, but he 172 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS wittily answered : " Tell them if they want papers they must move for them — we find it very hard to get them even so." During the debate on the Swedish treaty in 1814, Ward (afterwards Lord Dudley) left the House saying that he could not bear to hear Lord Castlereagh abuse his Master, upon which JekyU asked : " Pray, Ward, did your last Master give you a character, or did this one take you without." Sir William Scott, afterwards Baron Stowell, the judge to whom we owe the phrase about " the elegant simplicity of the three per cents," married in his sixty-eighth year the widow of the Marquis of Sligo. On the door of their house in Grafton Street, which had been her residence before the marriage, was a brass plate displaying her name, beneath which Sir William placed another bearing his own. " Why, Sir William," said JekyU, " I am sorry to see you knock under." Scott made no reply at the time but had the plates transposed. When next they met he said : " Now, Jekyll, you see I no longer knock under." " No, Sir William," said the uiu-elenting wit, "I see you knock up now." Ill " The best sayer of good things and the most epigram- matic conversationist I ever met." Such was Lord B5nron's judgment of Henry Luttrell, who was almost the immediate contemporary of Jekyll, being bom in 1765, twelve years later, and d3nng in 1851, fourteen years after JekyU. Though he made something of a reputation as writer of society verse it is mainly as a society wit that he is remembered. A dozen years after his death it was written of him that : " Few men were better known, WITS IN SOCIETY 173 thirty years ago in the world of fashion, than Henry Luttrell. The best man to make the table pleasant, to bring smiles to hostesses' lips, to restore the lost thread of conversation, to say good things as no other man could attempt, and to render mediocre stories to better style than anybody else." Henry Luttrell was the illegitimate son of Colonel LuttreU (afterwards Earl of Carhampton), who was Wilkes' opponent in the famous Middlesex election of 1769. At the age of twenty-three Luttrell was elected a member of the last Irish parliament ; in 1802 he went out to the West Indies to look after his father's estates there, but did not remain long. On his return he appears to have delighted the Duchess of Devonshire by his talk, and was by her introduced into society, where his wit was not long in winning him popularity. He soon came to be recognized as a social figure, becoming in course of time especially familiar at the gatherings at Holland House, and at Samuel Rogers' breakfast-parties — indeed, as a wit his name came to be always bracketed with that of Rogers, the two, it is said, being " seldom apart, and always hating, abusing and ridiculing each other." Luttrell is one of the several persons who have been credited with saying of Rogers' sumptuously illustrated " Italy " that the work would have been dished but for the plates. His " Letters to Julia in Rhyme " (first published as " Advice to Julia ") had quite a vogue in the twenties, and served no doubt to carry the name of the wit wider than the circles in which he moved. When Sir Walter Scott met him it was to recognize him as " the great London wit." Yet Luttrell was not a mere jester at the dinner-tables of the great; he was a talker, said Lady Blessington, who always made her think, and one who, as it has been said, was not devoid of occasional Thackerayan wrath 174 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS against the shams and snobberies of society, as in those lines: " O that there might in England be A duty on Hypocrisy, A tax on humbug, an excise On solemn plausibilities.'' It has been said by Lord John Russell that most of Luttrell's jests are mere puns, but though he could use the pun effectively the generalization is not true. When it was remarked that some people were opposed to the building of Waterloo Bridge because it would spoil the river, " Gad, sir ! " exclaimed he, " if a very few sensible persons had been attended to, we should still be champing acorns." It was Luttrdl who struck out something fresh on the weather when he said of the English climate : " On a fine day it is like looking up a chimney ; on a rainy day like looking down." " I am told that you eat three eggs every day at break- fast," someone said to Sir F. Gould. " No," answered he, " on the contrary." " What is the contrary of eating three ? " asked a bystander. " Laying three eggs, I suppose," at once volunteered Luttrell. At Holland House, where most of Luttrell's mots are said to have been uttered, there was a crowded dinner-party, when Lady Holland bade her company " make room " for a late arrival. " It must certainly be made," said Luttrell, " for it does not exist." Thomas Moore having mentioned that someone had said of a retired hat-maker's very dark complexion that he looked as if the dye of his old trade had got engrained into his face. " Yes," said Luttrell, " darkness that may be felt." WITS IN SOCIETY 175 After listening to Ellen Tree, the celebrated singer, Luttrell extemporized this pretty compliment : '- On this Tree if a nightingale settles and sings This Tree will return her as good as she brings.'' A traveller was describing the lasso as being useful for catching men as well as animals when Luttrell interposed with, " Why, the first syllable alone has caught many a man." Of a distinguished diner-out it was remarked that there would be on his tomb : " He dined late " — " and died early," added Luttrell. The wit in speaking of Daniel O'Connell, happily applied the lines : ' ' Through all the compass of the notes he ran. The diapason closing full in Dan." IV William Arden, second Baron Alvanley, like Luttrell, is chiefly remembered as a wit. He was the son of the first baron, was born in 1789, succeeded to the title in 1804, entered the army, from which he retired as lieutenant- colonel, and died in 1849. His story might be dismissed with the brevity of an epigram if it were not for his appearances in the letters and memoirs of the early part of the nineteenth century as one of the fashionable wits. In 1835, however, his lordship became prominent in the public eye owing to a passage-at-arms with Daniel O'Con- nell. The incident is amusingly summarized in a contem- porary journal under the heading of " Hear Both Sides." " House of Lords " Lord Alvanley. Have you anything to do with that rascal O'Connell ? 176 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS "Lord Melbourne. {Bothered.) I don't know him — I never heard of him — ^never had anything to do with him — don't wish to see him — we can do without him. " Lord Londonderry. I am glad to hear it — ^the villain, the Irish bully, the Papist blackguard. " House of Commons "Mr O'Connell. The bloated bufEoon — the unmarket- able Lord Alvanley— the degraded, the too-bad-stamped bully, Londonderry. " Such is the present state of the legislation market. What a fortunate thing it is for these gentlemen and noble- men that the reporters are ever on the watch to write down their polite speeches, so that nothing is lost." The words given seem actually to have been used, for Thomas Creevey wrote to a friend on April 29 : " We have an affair going on between Alvanley and O'Connell. Alvan- ley challenged him directly when he called him a ' bloated buffoon.' Damer Dawson is Alvanley's bottle holder, and as Dan had returned no answer to the demand upon him yesterday, which was supposed ample time, Dawson fired a second shot into him. / think Alvanley quite wrong in this, but Sefton is quite of a contrary opinion." Daniel O'Connell did not accept the challenge, but his son Morgan did, and shots were duly exchanged on Wimbledon Common, but neither opponent seems to have been " one penny the worse." The meeting led to much newspaper comment, and many jests at the expense of the contestants. Here is a running fire of comment from one journal : " Mr Morgan O'Connell's slight mistake in having a shot too much, is said to have been occasioned by loading with an Irish Bull-et. WITS IN SOCIETY 177 " In consequence of the lucky termination of the fracas between Lord Alvanley and Mr Morgan O'Connell, we are authorized to say, that there was no duel — only the report of one. " The Clubs consider the late duel not at all fair. His Lordship, though not a great man, being a hig man — whereas Morgan O'Connell has nothing large about him hut his mustachioes. " It is suggested that Mr M. O'Connell and Lord Alvanley have made themselves liable to the powder tax. " The proprietor of the battle-field has applied for a search warrant — as to the bullets. " It is matter of doubt in the clubs, whether the belligerent parties in the late duel, can be said to have exchanged shots. " The locality of the recent fierce contest was wrongly chosen ; such bad shots should have gone to Shooter's {H)ill. " The proprietor of the battle-field has put up a notice — Rubbish may not be shot here. " Lord Alvanley 's name denotes his nature — All-vain-lie. " Looking at the result of the duel, the thickness of young O'Connell, and the bloated circumference of the ' buffoon,' the little event may be said to have been not a fatal but a fat-all duel. " Lord Alvanley declares his belief that Mr Morgan O'ConneU's challenge to fight a duel was not an invitation to a ball. " The Tories declare that it is very hard, very cruel, and very Irish, that the Irish members should first kick them out and then call them out. " Lord Alvanley declares that he has had a very narrow escape. This is rather surprising, considering his Lord- ship's size." 178 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS The nine days' wonder of the duel seems to have brought Lord Alvanley into unusual prominence. It certainly was hard that one who was regarded as a leading society wit should be dubbed a " bloated buffoon," but according to Creevey he had been the first offender. The duel took place on 4th May 1835, and the next day Creevey wrote : " About this nonsense of Alvanley's, I consider every part of Alvanley's conduct as faulty. His first movement against O'Connell was political ; it was to create disunion between O'Connell and his tail and the Whigs. Then I know that this arose from spite, Alvanley having been lately refused a place in the Household which he asked for. Then the publicity he has given to his challenge of O'Connell is against all rule. However, he has been at last accom- modated by one of the O'Connell family, who had three shots at him last night in a duel, and no harm done to either party." Two of Alvanley's mots appear to be connected with this rencontre. When proceeding to the rendezvous the friend who accompanied him — more S5mipathetic than Creevy — said : " Let what wUl come of it, Alvanley, the world is extremely indebted to you for calling out this fellow as you have done." " The world indebted to me, my dear fellow," responded Alvanley, " I am devilishly glad to hear it, for then the world and I are quits." Re- turning from the bloodless fight he gave a guinea to the man who had driven him to and from the meeting place. Surprised at the sum the driver said : " My lord, I only took you to ." " My friend," interrupted Alvanley, " the guinea is not for taiing me there — ^but for bringing me back." Scenes from " Ivanhoe " were among the selections for a series of tableaux vivants at a fete at Hatfield House and Lady Salisbury having some difficulty in finding a man WITS IN SOCIETY 179 who would pose as Isaac of York, begged Lord Alvanley " to make the set complete by doing the Jew." " Any- thing within my power your ladyship may command," replied Alvanley, " but, though no man in England has tried oftener, I never could do a Jew in my life." Of a rich friend who had become poor Alvanley said that he was a man who " muddled away his fortune in paying his tradesmen's bills ! " Seeing a hearse standing at the door of a notorious gambling " hell " in St James's Street he went up to the mutes, took off his hat, and with a polite bow asked : " Is the devU really dead, gentlemen ? " CHAPTER XII A SOCIAL MISCELLANY '' " What a dull, plodding.tramping, clanking would the ordinary intercourse of Society be, without Wit to enliven and brighten it !" Anon THE four wits whose sayings are represented in the preceding chapter are perhaps those whose names most readily occur to mind if we think of wits in society — wits that is, who, for the purposes of history, are wits and wits alone, men who were in Parliament, were lawyers or soldiers, but whose reputation depends not upon any professional achievement but upon the quickness of their wits as conversationists. Other wits have been in society, but their fame is generally associated primarily with other achievements than the utterance of witty words. Classi- fication, as has before been pointed out, has necessarily to be of the roughest. A Sheridan belongs at once to the realms of the theatre, of politics and of society, and so it is with many others. Here, however, we may group together a number of witticisms that are associated with Society, using that term in a somewhat elastic sense, so that the society may range from the court to a civic feast, from Rogers' breakfast-table to the kitchen ; wherever that wit may have been uttered which, as Arch- bishop Tillotson put it, is properly used " to season conver- sation, to represent what is praiseworthy to the greatest i8o A SOCIAL MISCELLANY i8i advantage, and to expose the vices and follies of men, such things as are in themselves truly ridiculous." In a social miscellany we may fittingly recall that, if our monarchs have not been born witty, they have at least had wit thrust upon them. Possibly close research, if the matter were worth it, would reveaJ sayings that might pass for wit ascribed to the whole succession of our sovereigns — though it is a little difficult to think of any but a bitter jest from the thin lips of Tudor Mary — ^but we may be content with specimens from more recent reigns. The following must surely have been invented — or else history is unkind to the memory of George the Second. That monarch, we are told, was expressing high admiration of James Wolfe when someone remarked that the distinguished officer was mad. " Oh, mad is he ? " commented the King, " then I wish he would bite some other of my generals." King George the Third is also credited with some mUd pleasantries, as when he refused to take the pedigree of a horse that he had bought, telling the dealer that it would do very well for the next horse he had to dispose of. When riding near Richmond he inquired who it was that lived in a beautiful residence, and on being told that it was the property of a retired cardmaker he said : " Upon my word, one would imagine that all this man's cards turned up trumps " — ^which suggests the trained wit rather than the Farmer King. The following anecdote related of his Majesty may well be founded in fact. As told in the days in which folk seem to have delighted in that " syncopistic " fashion started by Tom Brown it runs : " George the Third ordered Mr S — , a tradesman of some eminence in London, to wait upon him at Windsor Castle, at eight o'clock in the morning of the day appointed. Mr S — was half an hour behind the time, and, upon being announced, his Majesty said, ' Desire him to come at eight o'clock i82 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS to-morrow morning.' Mr S — appeared the next day again after the time, and received the same command. The third day he contrived to be punctual. Upon his entrance, the King said, ' Oh ! the great Mr S — ! What sleep do you take, Mr S — ? ' ' Why, please your Majesty, I am a man of regular habits ; I usually take eight hours.' ' Too much, too much,' said the King, ' six hours' sleep is enough for a man, seven for a woman, and eight for a fool — eight for a fool, Mr S — .' " One of the stories told of George the Fourth suggests the manufactured jest fastened upon a prominent personage to give it currency. Discussing Moore's biography of Sheridan, the King is credited with having said : " I won't say that Mr Moore has murdered Sheridan, but he has certainly attempted his life." There is more of verisimili- tude, and a suggestion of a real sense of humoin-, in the story of his receiving, when Prince of Wales, a letter from a waiter named Samuel Spring beginning, " Sam, the waiter at the Cocoa Tree, presents his compliments to the Prince of Wales," and on meeting the waiter next day sapng, " Sam, this may be very well between you and me, but it won't do with the Norfolks and Arundels." A story told of William the Fourth, if genuine, shows that king possessed on occasion of a ready tact which is so happy as to be wit. The story runs that when dining with several officers he ordered a waiter to " take away that marine," pointing to an empty bottle. " Your Majesty ! " exclaimed one of the ofi&cers, " do you compare an empty bottle to a member of our branch of the service ? " " Yes," answered the King, " I mean to say that it has done its duty once, and is ready to do it again." If our Hanoverian kings did occasionally deviate into wit it is not surprising seeing that it was in their times that the wit of satire and of repartee and the play upon words A SOCIAL MISCELLANY 183 which is now damned as mere punning were perhaps at their highest ; that there were prominent among their subjects, sometimes in their own immediate social circles, men whose chief claim to consideration was their allied nimbleness of thought and tongue. Sometimes indeed they were themselves the targets at which the shafts of those others' wit were directed, though more of course in the satirical press than in the give-and-take of talk, where their position even in the convivial days of the Georges formed a certain protection, through which it needed the cool effrontery of a Beau Brummell to penetrate. A good story of the late portly Duchess of Teck was told by Canon Teignmouth Shore. Her Royal Highness was seated at dinner between Shore and another canon when the former said that she must find herself in rather an alarming position — " Canon to right of you, Canon to left of you Volleys and thunders." " Well," replied the Duchess, " this is the very first time I have been connected with the Light Brigade." II It is indeed largely owing to the anecdotes in which they figure that the beaux axe remembered at all, and but for the fact that they were possessed of some measure of wit and humour both Beau Nash, the " King of Bath," and Beau Brummell, the chum of the Prince Regent, would be little more than names to us now. It is the things they said rather than the things they did which serve to make them of interest to us. Nash may have been a benevolent despot who regenerated and established Bath as a social i84 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS centre, but when the city he served became once more provincial he would be but a shadowy figure if it were not for the stories of his ready humour, for only occasionally do his recorded remarks reach the point of wit. A gentleman calling upon him found the Beau just coming forth gorgeously arrayed, and asked him where he was going. " Going ! " echoed Nash, " why, I'm going to advertise." " What ? " came the surprised question. " Why, myself, for that's the only use of a fine coat." In which the sartorial philosophy of beaudom is summed up in a sentence. An extravagant visitor at Bath having squandered away most of his fortune suddenly absented himself from the Pump Room. The Beau on being asked what had become of him said briefly that " he kept his bed." The in- quirers forthwith called on the absentee, only to find him in excellent health. When they told of Nash's words he was indignant, and sought out the Beau to find what he meant by spreadiug such a report. " Why in such a heat?" said Nash imperturbably. " I sincerely hope that I have said nothing but the truth. I ventured to tell these gentlemen, indeed, that you kept your bed, and if you have, I rejoice at it : it is the only thing you have kept, and I knew it would be the last you would part with." Nash had a way of thus using his humoirr to censure his subjects. Another instance was, when proposing a charity subscription he noticed a notoriously mean man among those present. Having made his general appeal for funds the Beau turned and shouted his words at the niggardly one, who protested, asking what he did that for. " Because," said Nash coolly, " on these occasions you are generally deaf." He could also apply a pun happily, as when meeting a A SOCIAL MISCELLANY 185 Mend walking somewhat unsteadily, and on asking where he had been and being told that he had been all night at a concert, " very likely," he commented, " for I perceive you have drunk to some tune." Another amusing story describes the way in which, when engaged in collecting subscriptions for the Bath Hospital, he succeeded in getting handsome assistance from an unwilling subscriber. While he was announcing the object for which the funds were wanted, a duchess more notable for her wit than her charity entered the room, and not being able to pass him unobserved tapped him playfully with her fan and said : " You must put down a trifle for me, Nash, for I have no money in my pocket." " Yes, madam," said he, " that I will, with pleasure, if your Grace will tell me when to stop." Taking a handful of guineas out of his pocket, he began counting them into his white hat, " one, two, three, four, five " " Hold ! hold ! " exclaimed the Duchess, " consider what you are about.'' " Consider your rank and fortune, madam," answered Nash, and continued : " six, seven, eight, nine, ten " Here the Duchess again broke in angrily, but, " Pray jcompose yourself, madam," cried the Beau coolly, " and don't interrupt the work of charity ; eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen " The Duchess began to storm, and caught hold of his hand. " Peace, madam," said the relentless autocrat of the Pump Room, " you shall have your name written in letters of gold, madam ; seventeen, eighteen, nineteen, twenty " " I won't pay a farthing more," broke in the unwilling charitable Duchess. " Charity hides a multitude of sins," quietly observed her tormentor ; " twenty-one, twenty-two, twenty-three, twenty-four, twenty-five " i86 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS " Nash," said she, " I protest, you frighten me out of my wits. Lord ! I shall die ! " " Madam, you will never die with doing good ; and if you do it will be the better for you," and he proceeded counting, and only after some altercation agreed to hold his hand when he had made his victim responsible for thirty guineas. Another beau who had made something of a reputation as a sayer of smart things was Beau Brummell, who attached himself to the Prince Regent as Nash had done to Bath, and who found the Prince a less loyal friend than Nash found his city. One of the best known of Brummell's sayings is that arising out of a quarrel with the Prince. When speaking to someone within the hearing of the portly Prince, whom he affected not to know, the Beau asked in off-hand fashion : " Who's our fat friend ? " There are many versions of the story, some stamping it as mere chag- rined impertinence and others as a not undeserved snub. " Shoes ? I thought they were slippers," he said of a companion's footwear ; and " Coat ! do you call that thing a coat ? " of a friend's habit — but these are examples rather of humorous impertinence than of true wit or humour. Perhaps one of the best things said by Brummell was his emphatic answer to a friend who had described someone as " so well dressed that people turned to look at him," " Then he was not well dressed." Brummell once got the worst of a tongue encounter with a " cit." When high play was the rule at Brookes's club it was said that a certain Alderman Combe made as much money at the gaming-tables there as by his brewery. One evening when he was Lord Mayor he was at the hazard- table at Brookes's when Brummell was of the party. "Come, Mashtub," said the Beau, who was the caster, " what do A SOCIAL MISCELLANY 187 you set ? " " Twenty-five guineas," answered Combe, ignoring the rudeness. " Well, then," returned Brummell, " have at the Mayor's pony," and he continued to throw until he had secured a dozen of the brewer's " ponies " (£300), and then getting up and making him a low bow, while pocketing the cash, said, " Thank you ; for the future I shall never drink any porter but yours." " I wish, sir," retorted Combe, " that every other blackguard in London would tell me the same." Another civic dignitary came off less well at another club when at a dinner of the " Beefsteaks " an alderman presided, and James Cobb (1756-1818), secretary of the East India Company, and a dramatist more prolific than popular, was in the vice-chair. Cobb seems to have chaffed the chairman unmercifully until the alderman exclaimed : " Would to Heaven that I had another vice-president, so that I had a gentleman opposite to me ! " " Why should you wish any such thing ? " retorted Cobb, equal to the occasion ; " you cannot be more opposite to a gentleman than you are at present." Ill Horace Walpole who, in his correspondence and journals, reveals to us the social life of his portion of the eighteenth century, as Pepys and Eveljm reveal that of an earlier period, and who has preserved much of the ana of his time, was himself possessed of a share of that humour of which he had so ready an appreciation. He it was who wittily defined timber as " an excrescence on the face of the earth, placed there for the pajonents of debts." Charles Town- send also made his jest on the same theme. He was accosted one day by a peer whose hard-drinking son was then engaged in selling timber off his estates. " Well, i88 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS Chaxles, how does my graceless dog of a son go on ? " " Why, I should suppose," answered Townsend, " on the recovery, as I left him drinking the woods." Walpole could use a pointed pun, as when to Lady Barr3miore's remark, " I wonder why people say as poor as Job, and never as rich, for in one part of his life he had great riches," he replied, " Yes, madam, but then they pronounce his name differently, and call him Jobb." The readiness with which wit can apply a word may perhaps best be shown in such a rare case as that when we find the same word happily utilized on widely different occasions. Such an example we have in the word " per- fection." One day when Sir Isaac Heard was with George the Third it was aimounced that the King's horse was ready. "Sir Isaac," said his Majesty, "are you a judge of horses? " " In my younger days, please your Majesty," was the reply, " I was a great deal among them." " What do you think of this then ? " said the King, preparing to mount, and without waiting for an answer he added : " We call him ' Perfection.' " " A most appropriate name," replied Heard, as his Majesty reached the saddle, " for he bears the best of characters," In this case there was courtliness and wit. In the next instance the compliment was so happy as to be little removed from wit. A lady showing Sydney Smith round her garden pointed out some plant sa3dng, " Isn't it a pity I cannot bring this flower to perfection ? " " Let me, then," said the ready canon, taking her hand, " bring perfection to the flower," The following story of a young officer and his bootmaker is a pleasant instance of the humour of irony. A certain Ensign Smith (history has probably masked him under this familiar patronymic) stalked in a passion into the shop of Hoby the St James's Street bootmaker. The master of A SOCIAL MISCELLANY 189 the establishment appeared and the Ensign at once began his attack : "Mr Hoby, sir, I desire to know, I wish to understand — ^tell me, sir, directly, why my pumps were not sent home, or I will withdraw my custom — I will ; by heaven, I will." The astonished Hoby said he would inquire, and begged the gentleman to be pacified. " Paci- fied, sir ! " replied the Ensign, " I'll be hanged if I do. Bring me my bill ; I'll never deal with you any more. I withdraw my custom this moment — ^this very moment." The disconsolate bootmaker withdrew two steps, and called his foreman. " Mr Jones," said he, " dose the shutters, shut up the shop, discharge the workmen, and lock the door — I am ruined, ruined irretrievably — Ensign Smith has withdrawn his custom I " One of the stories that have been repeated with various heroes — ^it was told to me first of one of the Mayhew brothers, and an eminent firm of stationers — seems to have been earliest recorded of a Mr Sutton, son of Lord Canter- bury. Calling one day at Saunders & Otley's library he was very angry because certain books that he had ordered had not been sent. He was so heated in his indignation that one of the partners could stand it no longer, and told him so. " I don't know who you are," was Sutton's retort, " and I don't want to annoy you personally, as you may not be the one in fault ; it's your confounded house I blame. You may be Otley, or you may be Saunders ; if you are Saunders, damn Otley ! if you are Otley, damn Saunders ! I mean nothing personal to you." IV That last story has already brought us to the nineteenth century, the social witticisms of which, scattered about igo A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS memoirs and correspondence, would alone form a goodly collection. Leaving for the most part those, such as Sydney Smith and Theodore Hook, whose sayings call for separate presentation we may recall a few good things of men less lavish perhaps of their amusing sayings but not less excellent. Both James and Horace Smith — the brothers twiimed in fame as authors of " The Rejected Addresses " — ^were possessed of a pretty wit ; of the former especially, " one of the best talkers of his age," many impromptu epigrams and neat retorts are remembered. His readiness at turning a witty thought into verse seems indeed to have been a greater gift than that of Theodore Hook, in that he so often had a better point to make. Never, perhaps, did happy epigram call forth instant retort happier than the following. James Smith at a dinner-party, where Sir George Rose was also present, on being asked something about the street in which he lived. Craven Street, Strand, fired off : " At the top of the street ten attorneys find place And ten dark coal barges are moored at its base : Fly, Honesty, fly to some safer retreat For there's craft m the river, and craft in the street." Rose at once improvized a retort : '' Why should Honesty fly to some safer retreat, From attorneys, and barges, 'od rot 'em ? For the lawyers are just at the top of the street And the barges are just at the bottom." At one of Lady Blessington's social gatherings at Gore House, James Smith, on being told that William Wilber- force had once resided there, at once improvized for his hostess the lines : " Mild Wilberforce by all beloved. Once owned this hallowed spot ; Wiose zealous eloquence improved The fettered negro's lot; A SOCIAL MISCELLANY 191 Yet here still Slavery attacks Whom Blessington invites ; The chains from which he freed the Blacks She fastens on the Whites." To a wealthy vinegar merchant he addressed the follow- ing:— " Let Hannibal boast of his conquering sway. Thy Uquid achievements spread wider and quicker, By vinegar he through the Alps made his way. But thou through the world by the very same Uquor."- It being noted in company where James Smith was present that the confectioners had found a chemical method of discharging the ink from old parchments and then using them in the manufacture of isinglass, " I see," said he, " nowadays a man may eat his deeds as well as his words." In a talk on the lengths to which those will go who are improper in their regard for propriety, Lord Lyndhurst mentioned an old lady who went to the length of keeping her books classified, the male authors in one detached case and the female in another. " I suppose," said James Smith instantly, " that she did not wish to add to her library." A gentleman possessing the same names as the elder of the brothers Smith happened to take lodgings in the same house, with unpleasant consequences, for the letters intended for one reached the other. Said the author to the new-comer : " This is intolerable, sir, and you must quit." " Why am I to quit more than you ? " came the not tmnatural reply. " Because, sir," was the retort, " you are James the Second — and must abdicate." Smith maintained that the name of Mademoiselle Mars, the celebrated actress, was nothing but an assumed one. 192 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS and when pressed to say why replied that it was obviously a nom de guerre. James Smith died in 1839 when the railway was some- thing of a novelty, and in his last jest we have the first of many that have been made on a word that successive generations of punsters find irresistible. " Though a railroad, learned Rector, Passes near your parish spire ; Think not, sir, your Sunday lecture E'er will overwhelmed expire. Put not then your hopes in weepers, Sohd work my road secures ; Preach whate'er you will — ^my sleepers Never wUl awaken yours."- Horace Smith — ^who outlived his brother by ten years — was less notable as a talker, but is remembered as the sayer of some neat things. At the christening of one of his daughters the clergyman on hearing that the child's name was to be Rosalind said : " Rosalind ! Rosalind ! I never heard of such a name. How do you speU it ? " " Oh," answered Smith, " As You Like It ! " Horace Smith, too, succeeded in introducing humour into the conundrum when he puzzled a company by suddenly asking for a solution of the following : — " My first is a dropper, my second is a propper, and my whole is a whopper ! " No answer was forthcoming, when the delighted propounder triumphantly said, " Falstaff." When he lay dying someone asked, " Will you have some more ice ? " " No," he answered, " no more ice for me — except Paradise ! " — a play of words that in the circumstances would have appealed to Charles Lamb, who wished that his last breath might be inhaled through a pipe and exhaled in a pun. A SOCIAL MISCELLANY 193 In the mid part of the nineteenth century — connecting as it were the world of yesterday with that of over a century ago — one of the most notable social centres of " the wits " was the breakfast-table of the banker-poet, Samuel Rogers. There met men of the past and of the future, men of established fame and men who had already given earnest of fame to be. Samuel Rogers, who as a wizened old man was the butt of many wits, was no mean wit himself. His poetry was perhaps accorded more attention than it merited owing to his being a rich banker, but his breakfast-parties occupy a very important place in the social and intellectual history of his time. Some of his own utterances at those gather- ings were not less notable than those of such guests as Sydney Smith or Luttrell, and some of them were marked by a severity which those wits but rarely employed. As for example, when he said that " When Croker wrote his review in The Quarterly of Macaulay's ' History,' he in- tended miorder — ^but committed suicide." On its being remarked that someone was becoming very deaf, Rogers said : " 'Tis from want of practice — ^he is the worst listener I know." The autocratic Lady Holland induced Rogers to ask Sir Philip Francis if he was Junius. The poet put the ques- tion, and Francis stormed : " Ask that again, sir, at your peril." Next time Rogers met Lady Holland she said : " What success ? Is Francis Junius ? " "I don't know whether he is Junius," replied Rogers, " but I know he is Brutus." One of Rogers' best-remembered mots is the couplet which he made on Ward (afterwards Lord Dudley) by 194 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS way of retaliation. Arriviiig late at a dinner, Rogers apologized, saying that his carriage had broken down and he had been obliged to come in a hackney coach — " In a hearse, I should think," said Ward, in a stage whisper. Rogers' retaliatory epigram took some days in the making but was then set in circulation to be repeated again and again: " They say Ward has no heart, but I deny it. He has a heart, and gets his speeches by it." When it was announced that George the Fourth intended holding a " Drawing Room," Rogers said that if he did so his Majesty would then, in the parlance of the card- room, be a sequence in himself — King, Queen and Knave. To a young poet he said : " Don't you be so hard on Pope and Dryden — you don't know what you may come to." He had humour as well as wit, for in a conversation on the game laws he said : " If a partridge on arriving in this country were to ask. What are the Game Laws ? and some- body were to tell him they are laws for the protection of game, ' What an excellent country to live in,' the part- ridge would say, ' where there are so many laws for our protection.' " There was humour, too, in his contribution to a conversation about Lady Parke, " She is so good that when she goes to heaven she will find no difference — except that her ankles will be thinner and her head better dressed." When old Lady Cork complained to him, " You never take me anywhere," Rogers replied, " Oh, I will take you everywhere, and " — ^he added after a pause — " never bring you back again." One of Rogers' favourite stories, though perhaps not invented by him, is delightfully droll. It was of an Englishman and a Frenchman who agreed to fight a duel in a darkened room. The Englishman, unwilling to kill his SAMUEL R0(;ERS FUOM THE I'AINIING EV THOMAS I'Hll.T.Trs IN" THK .\A'IT(:>NAL GALLKRV A SOCIAL MISCELLANY 195 antagonist, fired up the chimney, and — brought down the Frenchman ! " When I tell this story in France," he was wont to add, " I make the Englishman go up the chimney." For some of the things said at Rogers' breakfast-table it is necessary to turn to the recorded mots of Luttrell, Sydney Smith and others, who attended those notable gatherings, where it will be seen that the host himself, unlike in physique to Falstaff as one man could well be from another, was like the fat knight in that he was not infrequently the cause that wit was in other men. One of Lord Dudley's jests at his expense has already been given ; on another occasion he asked the cadaverous poet why, being so rich, he did not " set up a hearse." And again meeting Rogers when he was supposed to be at Spa the poet said he had left because the place was full, " he could not find a bed." " Dear me," said his tormentor, " was there not room in the churchyard ? " Then, too, when someone remarked of a portrait of Rogers that it was " done to the life," " To the death, you mean," said Dudley. Dudley, too, made a neat reply to an Austrian lady who complained that such wretchedly bad French was spoken in London. " It is true, madam," said he, " but then we have not enjoyed the advantage of having the French twice in our capital." VI Richard Monckton Milnes, afterwards Lord Houghton — a notable figure in politics, literature and society — con- tinued such social breakfast-parties as Rogers had made famous, and like the older host had himself no mean power of wit, and a reputation which he recognized in an answer — a delightful blending of egotism and courtliness — which 196 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS he made to the Prince of Wales (afterwards King Edward). The Prince had asked Houghton who was the best after- dinner speaker of the time then in England, and received for reply, " It rests with you and myself, sir." He it was who defined good conversation as being to ordinary talk what whist is to playing cards, and who said that " trust in leaders has the same relation to politics that credit has to commerce. " He described an unsuccess- ful speech of Disraeli's as being " like the Hebrew language — ^without the points." Some of his remarks had rather the quaintness of drollery than the significance of wit, as when he found an unanswerable argument in favour of legalizing marriage with a deceased wife's sister — " if you marry two sisters you have only one mother-in-law ! " When he had visited Germany he declared that the solitude of Hanover was such that Zimmermann himself could not stand it — and died there." The day after the announcement that Milnes had been elevated to the peerage, an old friend, a commoner of high social distinction, asked jokingly what it felt like to be a lord. The new peer's eyes twinkled with irresistible humour as he made answer : "I never knew until to-day how immeasurable is the gulf which divides the humblest / member of the peerage from the most exalted commoner in England." Houghton's biographer says that he ven- tured to give this story in spite of the warning given to him by one of the earliest and greatest of MUnes' friends. " If you tell that," said Lord Tennyson, " every fool will think that Milnes meant it." Which looks as though Tennyson thought that it mattered what every fool thinks. When G. F. Watts had painted a huge picture of " Theo- dora and Honoria " someone asked what it represented. " Oh," said Milnes, " you have heard of Watts' hymns — these are Watts' hers." A SOCIAL MISCELLANY 197 Monckton Milnes' character was amusingly indicated by Thomas Carlyle when there was a suggestion that the poet-politician should be given a position in Peel's Cabinet. Turning to the possible Cabinet minister the Sage said : " There is only one post that is fit for you, and that is perpetual president of the Heaven and Hell Amalgama- tion Society." Sir Francis Doyle was dining at the Duke of Devon- shire's when the conversation turned upon the oddity of American names. " Fancy such a name as Birdseye ! " remarked someone at the table. " Birdseye," said Doyle, " is surely as good as ' Cavendish ' any day." " Not a creature smiled," he said, in repeating his jest. " They all thought I meant to insult them ! " CHAPTER XIII WITS ON THE PRESS AND IN LITERATURE " The man of humour sees common life, even mean hfe, under the new light of sportfulness and love." — Thomas Carlyle IT was, perhaps, in the social interplay of wits that the first idea of comic journalism arose. The quips and cranks of club and tavern gatherings first found their way into the newspapers, and from that it was but a natural step to the providing a special paper for the publication of such, and so to the production of such for the special pur- pose of publication. Here, however, we are not concerned with the comic press — ^that is another story that may be told at another time — but with the men who were con^ nected with the press generally and who are remembered also as the sayers of good things ; with, in other words, the journalist as wit rather than with the wit as journahst. Except in one or two cases where the fame of the wit has outlived the fame of the joiimalist — as in the cases of Theodore Hook and Douglas Jerrold — there appear to be but scattered mots recoverable, for journalists are not good boswellizers. Possibly they unconsciously take as their motto the lines which used to be inscribed over the chimneypiece of the Sublime Society of Beefsteaks : " Ne fides inter animos Sit, qui dicta foras eliminat.'' 198 ON THE PRESS AND IN LITERATURE 199 When William Jerdan, long the editor of The Literary Gazette, was dining with the " Steaks " he was detected making a note of a repartee which had just been uttered. The president, pointing to the Latin inscription, said : " Jerdan, do you understand those words ? " "I under- stand one of them," was the reply, " sit, and I mean to do it." Jerdan was a journalist of long standing and, though so zealous in making a note of^a good thing overheard, he does not seem to have been much given to wit himself. Probably had be been more of a wit he would have been less of a note-maker. Indeed, though it is not inappro- priate that the press should have a chapter in this work, it woTild not be easy to find any outstanding journalists who were only journalists to fill it. Possibly the most notable of the journalistic utterers of witticisms was Theodore Hook, whose sayings will be found in the next chapter, and he was as notable as man about town, as a social wit and a playwright, as he was journalist. Charles Lamb, as contributor of jeux d'esfrits to the newspapers, though mainly a man of letters ; Douglas Jerrold, who, though notable as journalist, was also dramatist, essayist and novelist ; Gilbert k Beckett, who was a police magis- trate as well as .a journalist, are representative figures ; the last two belonging to the time when the comic press had come into existence and each plajdng his part in its establishment. II Charles Lamb — the immortal Elia, one of the most engagingly delightfid of our humorists, one of the most individual and companionable of our men of letters — was only a journalist for a brief period and then only as con- 200 A BOOK OF FAMOUS WITS tributor of " sixpenny jokes " and brief criticisms to some of the daily journals. His happy puns, his ready retorts and other conversational good things have been repeated again and again, but a representative few may be given here, for to omit him from such a work would be unthink- able, it would be like an edition of Hamlet with all the familiar quotations left out. Some of his sajdngs may be unfamiliar to some of my readers, and even readers who know them all wiU readily admit that they bear repetition. It is not necessary to repeat the happy un- happy story of Lamb's life — happy in the circle of friend- ship of which it was the centre, unhappy in the tragic cloud of memory and ever-present threatening that lay over it. Here we are not concerned with the clerk whose writings were bound up in many volimies in the offices of the East India Company, nor with the essaj^ist, letter-writer, poet and critic, who was won for literature out of that clerk's spare time. It is the man who, as one of his friends put it, in a congenial company could always be depended upon to make " the best pun and the best remark in the course of the evening," the man who, " of the genuine line of Yorick," " stammered out wisdom in cap and beUs," that is here to be recalled. Lamb, it may be said at once, was of those who not only did not despise, but who even glorified, the pun, it was to him a thing of true art, and he in its use was something of a true artist. His bon-mots, however, are by no means all puns, though he could in- dulge in veritable word-twisters of this kind, as when of a grammar by Hazlitt bound up with a treatise on language by Godwin, he said : " The grey mare is the better horse." He was, however, a wit as well as a punster ; there is wit in the retort which he himself appears to have regarded as one of his best : " If you will quote any of my jokes," he CHARLES LAMB FROM THE DRAWING BY ROBERT HANCOCK IN 1798, NOW IN THE NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY ON THE PRESS AND IN LITERATURE 201 said to Crabb Robinson, " quote this, which is really a good one. Hume and his wife and several of his chil