s^^'^m^'^:^^-^^'^^:^:^ ^"^^^^ •'■:^.,-t ^S^? / «^- PERKINS LIBRARY Duke University t(a.re Book: J A V. / --^ 1. / -/JrCV-^v^^ 't-V?:. ■ f W " D Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Duke University Libraries http://www.archive.org/details/mathematicalphilOOwilk I lll ll l ll l illl l lllllllii ! ' J:iili:llllillilill!llliiillilll!liiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiil III, ^t^^^ THE Mathematical and J^hilofophical WORKS Of the Right Reverend J^OHN WILKINS, Late Lord BiOiop oUHESTE % CONTAINING, I. The Difcovery of a New World : Or, a Difcourfe tend- ing to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon. With a Difcourle of the Poflibility of a PaiTage thither. II. That 'tis probable our Earth is One of the Planets. '^Sk Mercury : Or, T':^e Secret and Swift Mejfettger. Shewing " how a Man may with Privacy and Speed communicate his Thoughts to a Friend at any Diftaace. IV. Mathematical Magtck : Or the Wonders that may be performed by Mechaitical Geometry. V. An Abftraft of his EfTay towards a RcalCharaBer^ and a Philofophical Language. To which is prefix d the A U T H O R's LIFE, and an Account of his Works. L O N D N: Printed for J. Nicbolfan, at the Klngs-JrmT in Little Britain ; ui. Bell, at the Crofs-Keys in Cornhill; B. Tooke, at the MiJ- (ile'Temple-Gate in Flectjlrcet ; and R Smith under the Piaz.- za's of the Royal-Exchange. M DCC Vlll. • THE IA/6S4M LIFE of the AUTHOR: AND AN Account of his WRITINGS. £ -was Son to Walter Wilkins, Citiz^en anX Goldfmith of Oxford; was horn at Fawlfly, we^r Daventry, in Northamptonlhire , in ^_^_ the Heufe of the Re'verend and well known Mr. John Dod, who wrote upon the Commandments^ he heino- his Grandfather hythe Mother s fide. He was taught hts Latin and Greek hy Edward Sylvefter, ^/oudGxt- cian who kept a Pri'v ate School in the Panjh of All baints in Oxford : H*f Troficiency was fuch, that at Thirteen Tears ofAze he entred a Student ^» New-Inn, r» Eafter-Term, 1627 He made no long fiay there, hut was removed to Maedalen-Hall, undertheTuition of Mr. John Tombes, and there he took h^ Degrees in Arts. He f^^r^^rds en- tred into Orders, and v; as fir H Chaplain to V^iWi^m Lord Say, and then to Charles Count Palatine of the Rhine, and Prince EleBor of the Empire, with whom he continue ed for feme time. 1 ■ . » 1 ■ r Upon the hreaking out of the Civil War, he join d with theParliament, and took f^e Solemn League and Cove- nant. He was afterwards made Warden of Wadham CoU lege hy the Committee of Parliament appointed for Reform- ingtheUni'verfity; and being created Batchelor ofDrvinity, April 12. 1648. was the Day following put tn pojjejfion of hts Wardenfliip. Next Tear he was created DoBor of Di- -vinlty, and about that time roo^ ;i>c Engagement the^en- joind by the Powers in being. ^ t. In 1656. he w^nie^ Robina, the WtdoW of Peter Vv^nch, formerly Canon o/Chrift-Church, Sifter to O- liver, then Lord Prote^or. In 16^9- ^^e washy Richard the ProteBor madeHeadof Tnmty College in C^mbndgs, the beH Prefmnmt in that Univerfuy, ¥1 The LIFE of tVie Author. /fter King Charles the \\6's Reft oration^ he ivas ej'ecl" €il from thence, and became Preacher to the Honourable Society (//Grays-Inn,<.WA///7//?e'r<7/5f. Lawrence Jury, London, in the rccm of Dr. Ward. About this Time he became a Member of the Royal Society, Tvaschofen one of their Cauncil^ and pro'v'J one of their mo (i Eminent Mem- bers, and Chief Benefit! or s. Scon after this he was made Dean of Rippon, and by the intereft of the late Duke of Buckingham, he tvas created Bijhop of Chefter, andcon- fecratedin theChappelofEiy-Houfe iwHolbourn, theiph tff November, 1668. by Dr. Cofin, Bijlwp of Durham j Dr. Laney, Bijlwp ofE\y; and Dr. ^2irdy Bijhop ofSalif- bury ; on which Occafion Dr.Tillotfon, afterwards Arch- bJfjQp of G-dMtThuvy , preach' d an Excellent Sermon. ^, He 'ii'as a Terfcn of great Natural Endowments, and by his Indefatigable Studf attain d to anJJni'uerfalln fight intjO all, or at leaft moft Farts ofUfeful Learning. He was a great Mathe7naticia7t, and "vay much advanced the Study o/'Aftronomy, both while he was Warden of Wadham College in Oxford, and at London, when he was a Mem- her of the Royal Society, He was as well feenin Mecha^ nicks and Experimental P hilofophy as any Alan in his Time, and was a great Promoter of them. In Divinity, which was his main Bufinefs, he excelled, and was a 'very Able Critick^ his Talent of Preaching was admirable, and more fuited to profit than to pleafe his Hearers', he affeBed an Apt and Plain Way of Speech, and exprefsd his Conceptions in a Natural Style, In his Writings he was yudicious and Tlain, and valued not Circumftances fo much as the Sub- fiance. This appear d evident in whatever Subjebl he un- dertook, which be ahvays made eafier for thofe that came after him. He treated fometimes on Matters that did not properly helong to his Profeffwn ', but always with a Defign to make Men wifer and better ; which was his chief End in promo- tijig Univerfal Knowledge , und one of the main Reafons for his entring into the Royal Society. H^ Virtues and Graces were very uncommon j at leafi as to that Degree of them The L I F E of the Author. them to which he attain d : His Trudeuce was 'very remark^ able, and feldom faiVd him ; but he was fo Openheartei and Sincere himfelf, that be was ready (except he hiew fome Caufe to the contrary ) to think other Men to he fo too 'j by which he was fometimes imposed on. H/ey nor was ever heard to utter a Word unbeco- ming a Wife Man, or a true Chrifiian. And thus he con- cluded his Days ivith Confiancy of Mind, Contempt of the World, and chearful Hopes of a BleJJcd Eternity , through Faith in our Lord Jefus Chrifi. He died in the Houfe of his Friend Dr. Tillotfon, in Chancery-lane in London, en the i^th of November, 1672. and -was huried on the J2.th of DeccmhQT following , under the North Wall of the Chancel of the Church of St. Lawrence Jewry , •where he had formerly been Minifier. His Funeral Ser- mon was preached by Dr. William Lloyd, then Dean of Bangor, (now Lord Biflwp of Wotcq^qv) at the Guild- hall-Chappel in London ; by which, thofe who are Cu- rious may be fatisfy'd, that every Fart of the Character here given him, may be jufiifyd to Advantage. As a further Vroof of it , and particularly cf his un- wearied Endeavours to promote XJniverfal Knowledge , *tis proper to fubjoin a Catalogue of his Works. 1. The fir (l was entitled , The Difcovery of a New World ^ or , A Difcourfe tending to prove. That ('tis probable) there may be another Habitable World in the Moon. Printed at London in 4to. 1635. and had Four Editions, the lafi in 1684. 2. Difcourfe concerning the Poffibility of a Paf- fage to the World in the Moon. Printed with the Difcovery. 3. Difcourfe concerning a New Planet ', tending to prove , That ('tis probable) our Earth is one of the Planets. London, 1640, in 8vo. The Author s Name is put to none of the Three ; hut they ivere fo well known to be his , that Langrenus, in his Map of the Moon, {Dedicated to the King of Spain ) calls one of the Spots of his Selenographick Map after his Name. 4. Mercury • or. The Secret Meflenger ; Shewing how a Man may with Privacy an4 Speed communi- cate viii The LIFE of the Author. cate his Thoughts to his Friend at any Diftance." London, 1 64 1. The Publication of this was occajiond by the writing of a little thing y <:za of thQ Royal-Exchange. MDCCVII. ■•tinifi%^i^C» i To the Reader. IF among^ thy Leifure Hours, thou canfi fpate arty for the Perufal of this Difcourfe , and doH look to find fomeivhat in it "which may feriJe for thy Information and Benefit ^ let me then ad'vife thee to come unto it Tvith an etjual Mind, not fivayed by "Prejudice , hut indifferently refolved to affent unto that Truth which upon delihera" tion fljall feem mofi probable Unto thy Reafon ^ and then I doubt not, but either thou wilt agree with me in this Af^ fertion , or at leaf: 7jot think it to be as far from Truth , as it is from common Opinion. Two Cautions there are, which I would willingly ad-' monijh thee of in the Beginning : 1, That thou jljouldji not here look to find an exaB accurate Treat ife ; fince this Difcourfe was but the Fruit of fame lighter Studies, and thofe too huddled up in ajhort time ; being firfi thought of and finiflied in the [pace of fome fe'iV Weeks j and therefore you cannot in reafojj eX' peB that it jhould be fo poliJJj'd, as perhaps the SubjeB would recjuire, or the Leifure of the Author might have done it. 2. To reritensher that I promife only probable ArgU" inents for the Proof of this Opinion ^ and therefore you mu(i not look that every Confecjuence {loould be of an un- deniable Dependance j or that the Truth of each Argu- ment jhould be meafured by its Neceffity. I grant , that fome /jftronomical Appearances may poffbly be folved other-= wife than here they are : But the thing I ai?n at is thM ; that probably they may fo be jolved , as I have here fet them down. Which, if it be granted ( as I think it, v^-ufi ) then I doubt not , but the indifferent Reader will find Jome Satisfatiion in the Main Thing that if to be f>rovedc To the Reader. Many anclmt Thilofcphers of the better Note , have formerly defended this /ifrtion which I ha-ue here laid down i and it were to be wiJJ,ed, that fome of us would more apply our Endea-uours unto the Examination of thefe old Opinions ; which, tho they have for a long time lien nege^ed by others, yet in them may you find many Truths WtU worthy your Tains and Obfervation. 'Tis a falfe Conceit, for m to think that amongfi the ancient Variety and Search of Opinions , the beji hath HiU prevailed. Time (Jatth the Learned Verulam; feems to be of the nature of a River or Stream -, which carrieth down to us that which is light, or blown uf, but fmketh that which ts 7v eighty and j olid. It IS my de fire , that by the Occafion of this Difcourfe, I mayraife up fome more aHive Spirit to a Search after ^ other hidden and unknown Truths : Since it mufi needs be \ a great Impediment unto the Growth of Sciences, for Men i (hlljo to plod on upon beaten Principles, as to be afraid of ! entertaining any thing that may feem to contradicl thew. An Unwillmgnefs to take fuch things into Examination, ts one of thoje Errors of Learning, in thefe Times obfer^ ved by the Judicious Verulam. ^lefiionlefs there are , manjjicret Truths ivhich the Ancients have pajjed over ' that are yet left to make fome of our Age famous for tb^ir ' Dijcoverj. "^ If by this Occafion I may provoke any Reader to an At- Farewell. ttw The Propofitions that are proved in this Difcourfe. Propofition I. THat the Strangenefs of this Opinion is no fujjiclent Reafon why it jhouU be reje^ed ; becaufe other cer- tain Truths have been formerly e(teemed ridiculous , and great Abfurdities entertai72ed by common Confent. By way of Preface. Prop. II. That a Tlurality of Worlds does not contradiB any Trincipk of Reafon or Faiths, Prop. III. , That the Heavens do not confjl- of any fuch pure Mat- ter -which can privilege them from the like Change and Corruption, as thefe Inferior Bodies are liable unto. Prop. IV. That the Moon is a Solid , Compared , Opaccus Body. Prop, V. That the Moon hath not any Light of her ownl Prop. VI. That there is a World in the Moon , hath been the «//- re^ Opinion of many ancient ^ "with fome modern Adathe- maticians ; and may probably be deduced from the Tenents of others. Prop. Prop. VII. That thofe Spots and brighter Parts ] •which by our Sight may be difiinguijlied in the Moon, dojJjew the Dif- ference bet-wixt the Sea and Land in that othr World, Prop. vm. That the Spots reprefent the Sea, and the brighter Tarts the Land, Prop. IX. Tljat there are High Mountains, Deep VaUies, a?id Spacious Flai7js in the Body of the Moon, Prop. X. That there is an /itmo-Sphara] or an Orb of grofs 'Vaporous Atr , immediately encompafmg the Body of the ._ ^ Prop. XL That as their World is o^,ir Moon, fo our World is thdr Moon, ^ Prop. XII. That 'tis probable there may be fuch Meteors belonging to ttjat World tn the Moon, as there are with us, , Prop. XIII. That tts probable there may be Inhabitants in this other World ; but of what kind they are, is uncertain, ^r » ^^°P- XIV, . That tts popjefor fome of cur Vofierlty to find out a Conveyance to this other World; and, if there be In-- Habitants there, to have Commerce with them. The? The Firft Book. That the Moon may be a World, The firft Propofition, by way of Preface. That the Strangenefs of this Opinion is no fuffici- ent Reafon why it fhould he reje^ed ; hecaufe o- ther certain truths have heen formerly efieemd ridiculous^ and great Ahfurdities entertain d hy common Confent, TH E R E is an Earneftnefs and Hungering after Novelty, which doth flill adhere unto all our Natures ; and it is part of that Pri- mi:ive Image, that wide Extent and infinite Capa- city at firft created in the Heart of Man. For this, fince its Depravation in Adam, perceiving it felf al- together emptied of any good, doth now catch after every new thing, conceiving that poffibly it may find Satisfadion among fome of its Fellow Creatures. But our Enemy the Devil (who drives flill to per- vert our Gifts, and beat us with our own Weapons ) hath fo contrived it, that any Truth doth now feem diftaftf-ful for that very reafon, for which Error is entertain'd ; Novelty. For let but fome upftart He- refie be fet abroach, and prefently there are fome out of a curious Humour ; others, as if they watch- ed an occafion of Singularity, will take it up for Canonical, and make it part of their Creed and Profeflion j whereas folitary Truth cannot any B 4 where That the Moon may le a World, where find fo ready Entertainment ; but the fame Kovelty which is efteemeo the Commendation of Error, and makes that acceptable ; is counted the Fault of Truth, and caufc:- that to be rejecacd. How did the incredu\ us World gaze at Cclufti- bus, when he promifcd to difcover another Part of the Earth ? And he could not for a long time, by his Confidence or Arguments, induce any of the Chri- ilian Princes, either to alfent unto his Opinion , or go to the Charges of an Experiment. Now if he, who had fuch good Grounds for his Aflertion, could find no better Entertainment among the wifei Sort , and upper End of the World ,• 'tis not likely then that this Opinion which I now deliver, fhall receive ^ny thing from the Men of thefe Days ; efpeciaiiy cur Vulgar Wits , but Misbelief or Derifi- on. It hath always been the Unhappinefs of new Truths in Philofophy, to be derided by thofe that are igno- rant of the Caules of Things ; and rejeded by o- theis, whofe Perverfencfs ties them to the contrary Opinion ,• Men whofe envious Pride will not allows any new Thing for Truth, which they themfelves were not the firft Inventors of. So that I may juftly exped to be accufed of a pragmatical Ignorance, -«ind bold Oilentarion ,• efpeciaiiy, (incc for this O- pinion Xincphams , a Man whofe Authority was a- ble to add Ibme Credit to his Aflertion , could not efcape the Ir.eCenfure from others. For Nat ^les Comes ipcak'mg of that Philofopher, and this his Opinion, faith thus ,• Nonmdli ne nihil fcijjevideantur, aiicjita ncoa monftra in Vhilofo'phiam introducunt, ut ali~ cujus ret in-Vintores ju'jje appreant. " Some there are *^ who left they might leem to know nothing , will ^^ bring up monlbons Abfurdities in Philofophy, ^ iha: jr afterward they may be famed for the Ift- ' vendon cf fbmewhat. " The fame Author doth ^iio in another Place 2,(:qm{q ^^naxcgoras of Folly for the Tl?at the Moon may he a World. j the fame Opinion. EJl enlm non ignohlUs gradus fiul-r titiiBy 'vel Ji nefcias (^uid dicas, tamen "velle de rebus pro- tofitis banc ^uel iUam 'partem fiahilire. *^ 'Tis none of *•"' the worft kinds of Folly, boldly to affirm one " fide or other, when a Man knows not what to lay. If thefe Men were thus cenfur'd, I may juftly then expert to be derided by moft, and to be be- lieved by few or none , efpecially fmce this Opini- on feems to carry in it fo much Strangenefs, and Contradiction to the General Confent of others. But however, I am refolv'd that this fhall not be a- ny Difcouragement, fince I know that it is not com- mon Opinion that can either add or detrad from the Truth. For, 1. Other Truths have been formerly efteemed al- together as ridiculous as this can be. 2. Grofs Abfurdities have been entertained by ge- neral Opinion. I fhall give an Inftance of esch, that fo I may the better prepare the Reader to confider Things without a Prejudice ; when he fhall fee that the com- mon Oppoiition againft this which I afiirm , cannot any way derogate from its Truth. I. Other Truths have been formerly accounted as ridiculous as this. I fhall fpecify that of the Jn- tipodesy which have been denied, and laught at by many wife Men and great Scholars ^ fuch as were Herodotus, Cbryfofiom, Aufiin, LaBantius, the venera- ble 5e^/ ^- '• furdity, that he could not forbear laughing to think '^'^^' '' of it. TsAiyQ h^uv yni '■^^oJ^ai y^.-^aMTci{,7n,».i( ii/t< )y ijivetvoov yhui' 'ivcmv xi/xAo TSfSfit 6>( arrmipw. *' J cannot *' chufe but laugh , ( faith he ) to fee fo ma- *' ny Men venture to defcribe the Earths Compafs, '' lela- That the Moon may he a World, " relating thofe things that are without all Senfe ^ " as that the Sea flows about the World, and that the '^ Earth it felf is round as an Orb. " But this great Ignorance is not fo much to be admired in him , as in thofe learneder Men of later Times,when all Sci- ences began to flourifh in the World. Such were St. Chryfoftom, who in his 14th Homily upon the Epi- ille to the Hebrews^ does make a Challenge to any Man that fhall dare to defend that the Heavens are round, and not rather as a Tent. Thus likewife St. j/iufiin, who ccnfures that Relation of the Antipodes to be an incredible Fable ; and with him agrees the lEAoquentLa^antius.^uid illi qui eJJ'e contraries vefligiis no- fir is Antipodes put ant } nuniali(juidloquu7itur} atitefi i^uifpi' am tarn inept us, eftti credat ejfe bomineSyquorum 'vefiigia Junf fuperiora (^jUam capita ? aut ibi qua a pud nos jacent in'verfa pendete }fruges d^ ar bores deorfum verfus crejcere.plwvias d^ viveSyO'grandinemfurfum'verfuscadereinterram ? d^ mi- rat ur aliquis bortos penjiles inter feptem mira nrrrariy quum Tbilofophiyd^ agros d^maria,d^urbes d^ msntes pejijilesfaci- untjd^c." What(faith he)are they that think there are '^Antipodesjfuch as walk with theirFeet againft ours? *' do they fpeak any likelihood ; or is there any one *■' fo foolifh as to believe that there are Men whofe *•' Heels are higher than their Heads ? that things '' which v/ith us do lie en the Ground, do hang '•" there ^ that the Plants and Trees grow dovv^n- ^' wards, that the Hail, and Rain, and Snow fall up- " wards to the Earth ? and do we admire the hang- " ing Orchards amongft the Seven Wonders, where- " as here the Philofophers have made the Fields and "^ Seas, the Cities and Mountains hanging ^ " What fliall we chink (faith he in P/«f.) that Men do cling to that Place likeWorms.or hang by their Claws asCats? or if we fuppofe a Man a little beyond the Center, to be digging wicha Spade, is it likely (as itmuftbe according to this Opinion) that the Earth which he Tl^at the Moon may he a Worlds j he loofened, ihould of it felf afcend upwards ? Or dfe fuppofe two Men with their Middles about the Center, the Feet of the one being placed where the Head of the other is, and fo two other Men crofs them ; yet all thefe Men thus fituated, according to this Opinion Ihould ftand upright,* and many other fuch grofs Confequences would follow ( faith he ) which a falfe Imagination is not able to fancy as poflible. Upon which Confiderations, £f^^alfo de- nies the Being of any Antipodes, NetVue enim Antl-- ^^ r^tiont fodarum uUatenus efi Fabulis accommodandus ajjenfus, *"^P°^^^> *' Nor ftiould we any longer affent to the Fable of ^^*^^' ^' Antipodes. " So alfo Lucretius the Poet fpeaking of^the fame Subjed, fays, Sed vantis pclidis hac omnia finxerit error. ^^ ^^^- ^^' That feme idle Fancy feigned thefe for Fools to ^«'"^'^-'- believe. Of this Opinion was Trocofius Gaz>ceus ; Comment. but he was perfuaded to it by another kind of Rea- ^J^^^^" ^*^' fon i for he thought that all the Earth under us was funk in the Water, according to the Saying of the Tfalmifi, He bat b founded the Earth upon the Seas y and Pral.t4. 2. therefore he accounted it not inhabited by any. Nay, Tofiatusy a Man of later Years and general Learning, doth alfo confidence deny that there are any fuch Antipodes, though the Reafon which he urges for it be not fo abfurd as the former ; for the Apoftles, faith he, travelled through the whole ha- comment. bitable World, but they never palTed the Equinodi- ^'« ^ G«»e/. al : And if you anfwer, that they are faid to go through all the Earth, becaufe they went through all the known World ; he replies. That this is not fufficient, fince Chrift would have all Men to be faved, and come to the knowledge of his Truth, iTlm.2.4; and therefore 'tis requifite that they fhould have tra- velled thither alfo, if there had been any Inhabi- tants ; efpecially fmce he did expredy command ^ them to go and teach all Nations, and preach the Gufpel through the whck World ; And therefore he thinks. /r? vita Paul ^- Tiiil. Mctam. Lib. 4. Tl^at the Moon may he a World, thinks, that as there are no Men, fo neither are there Seas, or Rivers, or any other Conveniency for Habitation. 'Tis commonly related of one Vir^ gilfus, that he was Excommunicated and Condemn- ed for a Heretick by Zacharj Bifliop of Rowcj be- caufe he was not of the fame Opinion, But Baronh us fays, it was becaufe he thought there was ano- ther Habitable World within ours. However, you may well enough difcern in thefe Examples, how confident many of thefe great Scholars were in fb grofs an Error; how unlikely, what an incredible thing it feemed to them, that there fiiould be any Antipodes j and yet now this Truth is as certain an(J plain, as Senfe or Demonftration can make it. This then which I now deliver, is not to be re- jeded, though it may feem to contradid the com- mon Opinion, 2. Grofs Abfurdities have been entertained by ge- neral Confent. I might inftance in many remarka- ble Examples, but I will only fpeak of the fuppofed Labour of the Moci in her Eclipfes, becaufe this is nearell to the chief Matter in Hand, and was re- ceived as a common Opinion amongft many of the Ancients ^ infomuch, that from hence they ftiled Eclipfes by the Name of m^>« Ti^JJions, or in the Phrafe of the Poets, SoUs lunacfy lahores. And therefore P/«f^rc^fpeaking of a Lunary Eclipfe,' relates, that at fuch times 'twas a Cultom amongft the Romiuis^ ( the molt Civil and Learned People in the World ) to found Brafs Inftruments, and hold great Torches toward theHeaven. Tw;/ 3 Pft)^a/wC«Vc^P 77V p^ T0M«.' ab.\oli }C^ JtCOyh AVl'yAVTWV 'ST^t'liv i^JtVOV. por by this means they fuppofed the Moon was much eafed in her Labours ; and therefore Ovid calls fuch loud In- ftruments, the Auxilaries or Helps of the Moon, Cumfrufira refonan^ ara catxiUaria Luna, And Tl?at the Moon may he a World, / And therefore the Satyrift too, defcribing a loud Scold, fays, She was able to make Noife enough to deliver the Labouring Moon. Una labor anti poterit fuccurrere Luna* Juven. Now the reafon of all this their Ceremony, wa^, 5*^- ^' becaufe they feared the World would fall afleep, when one of its Eyes began to wink, and therefore they would do what they could by loud Sounds to rouze it from its Drowfinefs, and keep it awake ,• by bright Torches, to beftow that Light upon it which it began to lofe. Some of them thought hereby to keep the Moon in her Orb, whereas otherwife fhe would have fallen down upon the Earth, and the World would have loft one of its Lights ; for the credulous People be- lieved that Inchanters and Witches could bring the Moon down ; which made Virgil fay, Cantus d^ e ccelo pojjunt deducere hunam. And thofe Wizards knovving the times of her Eclip- fes, would then threaten to fliew their Skill, by pul- ling her out of her Orb. So that when the filly Multitude faw that fhe began to look red, they prefently feared they fhould lofe the Benefit of her Light, and therefore made a great noife that fiie might not hear the found of thofe Charms, which would otherwife bring her down • and this is ren- dred for a Reafon of this Cuftom by Vliny and Vro- ^ertius : ^^'- ^'^; Cantus df ^ curru lunam deducere tint ant , Et facerentf Ji ncn ara repulfa fonent. Tlutarch gives another Reafon of it j and he fays, *tis becaufe they would haflen the Moon out of the dark Shade wherein fhe was involv'd, that fo fhe might bring away the Souls of thofe Saints that in- habit within her, which cry out by reafon they are then deprived of their wonted Happinefs, and can- not hear the Mufick of the Spheres • but are forced to behold the Torments and Waitings of thofe Damn- 8- Tlmt the Moon may he a World. ed Souls which are reprefented to them as they are tortured in the Region of the Air. But whether this, or whatever elfe was the meaning of this Su- perftition, yet certainly 'twas a very ridiculous Cu- ftom, and bewniyed a great Ignorance of thofe an- cient Times ,• efpecially fince it was not only re- ceived by the Vulgar, fuch as were Men of lefs Note and Learning, but believed alfo by the more Famous and -Vifer Sort ,• fuch as were thofe great | Poets, Stefichorus and Vindar : And not only amongft j the more fotcifh Heathens, who might account that j Planet to be one of their Gods, but the Primitive j Chriftians alfo were in this kind guilty ,- which made St. Amhrofe ^ fo tartly to rebuke thofe of his time^ when he faid. Turn turbatur carminibus Globus Luna^ ciuando calicibui turbantur d^ eculi. *' When yout Heads are troubled vvith Cups, then you think *^ the Moon to be troubled with Charms. '* Tw-nicnf. And for this Reafon alfo did Maxhms a Bifliop^ Pi<=' wrice a Homily againft it, wherein he fhewed the Abfurdity of that foolifh Superftition. I remember that LuJo'vicus Vivcs relates a more ridiculous Story of a People that imprifon'd an Afs for drinking up the Moon, whofe Image appearing in the Water, tvas covered with a Cloud as the Afs was drinking ^ for which the poor Beall was afterward brought to the Bar, to receive a Sentence according to his De- ferts J where the grave Senate being fet to examine the Mstter, one of the Counfel (perhaps wifer than the reit) rifes up, and out of his deep Judgment, thinks it not fit that their Town (hould lofeitsMoon, but that rather the Afs fhould be cut up, and that taken out of him ; which Sentence being approved \>y the reft of ^hofe Politicians, as the fubtileft way for the conclufion of the Matter, was accordingly • performed. But Vv^hether this Tale were true or no, 1 will not queftiorl j hov/ever, there is Abfurdity e- iiough in that former Guftom of the Ancients, that may That the Moon may he a World, p may confirm the Truth to be proved, and plainly declare the Infufficiency of common Opinion to add true Worth or Eftimation unto any thing. So that from that which I have faid, may be gathered thus much. 1. That a new Truth may feem abfurd and im- poflible, not only to the Vulgar, but to thofe alfo who are otherwife wife Men and excellent Scholars : And hence it will follow, that every new thing which feems to oppofe common Principles, is not prefently to be rejeded, but rather to be pry'd into with a diligent Enquiry, fmce there are many things which are yet hid from us, and referv'd for future Difcovery. 2. That it is not the Commonnefs of an Opinion that can privilege it for a Truth ,• the wrong way is fometimes a well-beaten Path, whereas the right way (efpecially to hidden Truths) may be lefs trod- den and more obfcure. True indeed, the ftrangenefs of this Opinion will detrad much from its Credit ; but yet we fhould know that nothing is in it felf flrange, fmce every Natural EiFed has an equal dependance upon its Caufe, and with the like neceffity doth follow from it ; fo that 'tis our Ignorance which makes things appear fo : And hence it comes to pafs, that maiiy more evident Truths feem incredible, to fuch who know not the caufes of Things. You may as foon perfuade fome Country Peafants that the Moon is made of Green Cheefe, (as we fay) as that 'cis big- ger than his Cart-wheel, fince both feem equally to contradid his fight, and he has not Reafon enough to lead him farther than his Senfes. Nay, fuppofe (faith Plutarch) a Philofopher fhould be educated in fuch a fecret Place, where he might not fee either Sea or River, and afterwards fhould be brought out where one might fhew him the great Ocean, teU ling him the Quality of chat Water, that it is brack- ifli. 1 o That the Moon may he a World. ifih, fait, and not potable, and yet there were many vafl Creatures of all Forms living in it, which make ufe of the Water as we do of the Air ,• queftionlefs he would laugh at all this, as being monftrous Lyes and Fables, without any Colour of Truth. Juft fo will this Truth which I now deliver appear unto o* thers , becaufe we never dreamt of any fuch Mat- ter as a World in the Moon ; becaufe the State of that Place hath as yet been vailed from our know- ledge, therefore we can fcarcely aflent to any fuch Matter. Things are very hardly received, which are altogether ftrange to our Thoughts and our Sen- fes. The Soul may with lefs difficulty be brought to believe any Abfurdlty, when as it has formerly been acquainted with fome Colours and Probabilities for it ,• but when a new, and an unheard-of Truth fiiall come before it, though it have good Grounds and Reafons, yet the Underllanding is afraid of it as a Stranger, and dares not admit it into his Belief, without a great deal of Relu(5lancy and Trial. And befides, things that are not manifefted to the Senfes, are not alTented unto without fome Labour of Mind , fome Travel and Difcourfe of the Un- derllanding ; and many lazy Souls had rather qui- etly repofe themfelves in an eafy Error, than take pains to fearch out the Truth. The Itrangenefs then of this Opinion which I now deliver, willbe a great hindrance to its Belief^ but this is not to be refped- ed , by reafon it cannot be helped. I have Itood the longer in the Preface, becaufe that Prejudice which the meer Title of the Book may beget, can- not eafily be removed without a great deal of Pre- paration ; and I could not tell otherwife how to redify the Thoughts of the Reader, for an iitipar- tial Survey of the following Difcourfe. I muft needs confefs, though I had often thought U'irh my felf that it was poffible there might be a World in the Moon, yet it feemed fuch an uncouth Opin^ That tie Moon may he a World if Opifiionj that I never durft difcover it, for fear of being counted lingular and ridiculous ,• but after- ward, having read Plutarch^ Galileus, KeflaVy with fome others, and finding many of mine own Thoughts confirmed by fuch ftrong Authority,! then concluded that it was not only poffible there might be, but .probable that there was another Habitable. World in that Planet. In the profecuting of this AlTertion, I fhall firft endeavour to clear the v^ay from fuch Doubts as may hinder the fpeed or eafe of farther Progrefs. And becaufe the Suppofitions imply'd in this Opinion, may feeni to contradidl the Principles of Reafon or Faith, it will be requifire that I firft remove this Scruple, ihewing the Con- formity of them to both thefe, and proving, thofe Truths that may make way for the reft j which I fhall labour to perform in the fecond, third, fourth, and fifth Chapters, and then proceed to confirm fuch Propofitions which do more diredly belong to the main Point in hand. ^ • PROP. ir. That a Plurality of Worlds rioth yfot contradi^ any Vrinciple of Reafon or Faith. TI S reported of Arifiotk, that when he faw the ^ Books of Mofesj he commended them for fuch a MajelHck Stile as might become a God ; buc vv^ich- al, he cenfured that manner of Writing to be very unfitting for a Phiiofopher ,• becaufe there was no- thing proved in them, but Matters were delivered as if they would rather command than pcrfuade Belief. And 'tis obferved, that he fetsdown nothing himfelf, but he eoD.firms it by the ftrongeft Reafons that may C ^@ 1 1 That the Moon may he a World, • be found, there being fcarce an Argument of force for any Subjed in Phiiofophy, which may not be picked out of his Writings j and therefore 'tis likely if there were in Pveafon a nece/Hty of one only World, that he would have found out fome fuch ne- celfary Proof as might confirm it • efpecially fince belabours for it fo much in two whole Chapters. But now all the Arguments which he himfelf urges in this Subject, are very weak, and far enough from having in them any convincing Povv'er. Therefore: 'tis likely that a Plurality of Worlds doth not con-' tradidl any Piinciple of Reafon. However, I will fet down the two chief of his Arguments from his. own Works, and f;om them you may guefs the force ^ of the other. &id. The Firlt is this : Since every heavy Body doth naturally tend downwards, and every light Body up- wards, what a huddling and confulion muit theie be, if there were two Places for Gravity, and two Pla- ces for Lightnels ? for it is probable that the Earth of that other World would fall down to this Center, and fo mutually the Air and Fire here afcend to thofe Regions in the other • which muft needs much derogate from the Providence of Nature, and caufe a great Diforder in his Works. But ratio hac eH mi- vimc firma, (faith Zanchy. ) And if you well confi- der the Nature of Gravity, you will plainly fee there is no Ground to fear any luch Confufion j for Hea- vinefs is nothing elfe but fuch a Quality as caufes a Propenlion in its Subjed to tend downwards towards Its own Centre : So that for fome of that Earth to come hither, would not be faid a Fall, but an Afcen- fion, fmce it is moved from its own Place • and this would beimpodible (faith Ruvio ) becauie againft Nature, and therefore no more to be feared than the tallmg of the Heavens. If l%at the Moon may he a World, i j If you reply, that then according to this, there muft be more Centres of Gravity than ode ,• I an-- fwer, Tis very probable there are ,• nor can we well conceive what any piece of the Moon would do, be- ing fevered from the reft in the fiee and open Air, but only return unto it again. Another Argument he had from his Mafter Plato, MetAf. That there is but one World, becaufe there is but /. 12. c.$, one firft Mover, God. Diog. La^ hfrrna etiam ef hac ratio (faith Zatichy); and V/e '''^' ^'^'^' may juftly deny the Confequence, fince a Plurality of Worlds doth not take away the unity of the firft Mover, Ut enlm forma [ubHantialii, fie fr'imum effuievs (iparentein falummodo multipllcitatem indu'it per figncitam materiam (faith a Countryman of ours.) As thefub- Nic.m.di ftantial Form, fo the efficient Caufe hath only an P^'^'f^P^ appearing Multiplicity from its particular Matter. f-^'''JT You may fee this I>oint more largely handled, and ' ' thele Arguments more fully anfwereJ by Plutarch in his Book, mjjf Oracles are Silent, and Jacob Carten- tarius in his Comment on Alcinous. But our Oppofites, the Interpreters themfelves, ( who too often do jurare in ^erba magifiri ) wil! grant that there is not any ftrength in thefe Confe- quences ,• and certainly then fuch weak Arguments could not convince that wife Philcfopher, who iri his other Opinions was wont to be fwayed by the itrength and power of Reafon -, wherefore I fhould rather think that he had fome by-refped, which made him firft aftent to this Opinion, and afterwards Itrive to prove it. Perhaps it was becaufe he feared to dilpleafe his Scholar Alexander j of wham 'tis re- Plutarch. lated, that he wept to hear a Difputation of another ^^ ''"'^"3'' World fince he had not then attained the Monar- *"'''^' chy of this ; his reftlefs wide Heart would have e- Iteemed this Globe of Earth not big enough for him, if there had been another ,• which made the Satyrift lay of him^ >4 That the Moon may he a World, ''"'"^' « ^."^^V^"^^ "'/«^^"^' '^'^g^o Umite mimii. ^^ That he did vex himfelf, and fweat in his Defires, ^^ as being pennd up in a narrow Room, when he was confin d but to one World. " Before, he thought to feat himfelf next the Gods, but now, when he had done his beft, he muft be content with loine equal, or perhaps fuperior Kings. It may be, that Arlftotk was moved to this Opini- on, that he might thereby take from Alexander the occafion ot this Fear and Difcontent ,• or elfe, per- haps, Jirlflotle himfelf was as loth to hold the Poffi- bnity of a World which he could not difcover, as ^>ex,nder was to hear of one which he could not conquer. 'Tis likely that fome fuch by-refpea mo- ved him to this Opinion, fince the Arguments he ur- ges for It are confefs'd by his zealous Followers and Commentators, to be very flight and frivolous : and they themfelves grant, what I am now to prove, that there is not any Evidence in the Light of Natu- ral Realon, which canfufficiently manifell that there IS but cne World. ^ Eut however, fome may objed. Would it not be inconvenient and dangerous to admit of fuch Opi- nions tnat do deftroy thofe Principles oi Ari(iotle which all the World hath fo long followed > This Queftion is much controverted by fome of xh^Koml^n Divines : Ccim^amlla hath writ a Treatife in l^efencc of it, in whom you may fee many thines wortn the Reading and Notice. Toitlanfwer, That this Pofition in Philofophy doth not bring any Inconveniency to the reft hnce ns not AriHctle, but Truth, that fiiould be the Rule ot our Opinions ,• and if they be not both found to^ gether, we may fay to him, 'as he faid to his Mafter" I. tlato, '' Though Vlato were his Friend, yet he would ra- ._ ther adhere to Truth than him. I muft That the Moon 7nay he a World. \ j I muft needs grant, that we are all much be- holden to the Induftry of the ancient PhilofopherSj and more efpecially to Aristotle, for the greater part of our Learning ; but yet 'tis not Ingratitude to fpeak againfthim, when he oppofeth Truth,- for then many of the Fathers would be very guilty, efpeci- ally Jufi'pty who hath writ a Treatife purpofely a- gainft him. But fuppofe this Opinion were falle, yet 'tis not againft the Faith, and fo it may ferve for the better Confirmation of that which is true ; the Sparks of Error being forc'd out by oppolition, as the Sparks of Fire by the llriking of the Flint and Steel. But fuppofe too that it were Heretical, and againft the Faith, yet may it be admitted with the fame Privilege as Arlfiotky from whom many more dangerous Opinions have proceeded : As that the World is Eternal ; that God cannot have- while to look after thefe inferior Things,- that after Death there is no Reward or Punifiiment, and fuch like Blafphemies ,• which flrike dire6lly at the Funda- mentals of our Religion. - So that it is juftly to be wonder'd, why fome fhould be fo fuperftitious in thefe Days, as to ftick clofer unto him, than unto Scripture, as if his Philofophy were the only Foundation of all Divine Truths. Upon thefe Grounds, both St. Vincentim and Sera- finus de Firmo ( as I have feen them quoted ) think that Arifiotle was the Viol of God's Wrath, which was poured out upon the Waters of Wifdom by the Rev. 164. third Angel : But for my part, I think the World is much beholden to him for all his Sciences. But yet 'twere a fliame for thefe later Ages, to reft our fclves meerly upon the Labours of our Fore fathers, as if they had informed us of all things to be known j and when we are fetupcn their Shoulders, not to fee further than they themfelves did. 'Twere a fuper- ftitious, a lazy Opinion, to think Arifiotle s Works the Bounds and Limits of all Human Lnvention, be- C 5 yond fart t. ^ }9 That the Moon 9nay he a World. yond which there could be no poffibility of reach- ing- Certainly there are yet many things left to Dilcoyery, and it cannot be any Inconveniency for ns to maintain a new Truth , or redifie an ancient Jbrror. But the Pofition ( fay fome ) is diredly againft bcnpture • for, ^ I. Mofes tells us but of one World, and his Hifto- ry ot the Creation had been very imperfea, if God had made another. 2 St. John fpeaking of God^s Works, fays, he made the World, in the lingular Number, and there- fore there IS but one. "lis the Argument of ^^«i- f7as, and he thinks that none will oppofe it, but fuch who with Democriius efteem fome blind Chance, and not any uife Providence, to be the Framer of all i hings. ;. The Opinion of more Worlds has in ancient J.imes been accounted a Herelie • and £^r.«/«, af- ^-"]^- D^/""' ^''^^ ^^'y ^^'^^-^ P'lrgilius was caft out ot his Bifhopnck, and Excommunicated from the Church. 4. A fourth Argument there is urged by Aquinas : If there be more Worlds than one, then they muft either be of the fame, or of a diverfe Nature • buc they are not of the lame kind • for this were need- ij.ls, and would argue an Improvidence, fince one xt'ould have no more perfedion than the other : Not "" M !7T A?^'.' ^""^ '^^" °"^ «f fhem could not be called the World or Univerfe, fince it did not con- ram univerfal Perfedion. I have cited this Argu- z, P. cTl rf " '' ^? "^""^^ ^°^^ "P^" by Julius pePhencm. CparU Gulla,^ One that has purpofely writ a Trea- tile againft this Opinion which I now deliver : but tne Dilemma IS fo blunt, that it cannot cut on either tide, and tneConfequencesfo weak, that Idare truft ^em Without an Anfwer : And (by the way) you niay fee this later Author in that place, where he endea- Jtftnal. 748. /^/^ That the Moon mcty he n World. 1/ endeavours to prove a Necefliry of cne Worii!, doth leave the chief Matter in hand, and take much need- lefs Pains to difpute againft Dew^mV?.'/, who thought that the World was made by the cafual Concourfe of ^toms in a gre-n J''acnuv?. It fhould feem dm either his Caufe or his Skill was weak, or dk he would have ventured upon a ftronger Adverfary. Thefe Argu- ments which I have fet down are the chiefefl which Ihave met with againft this Subjed ^ and yet the bed of thefe hath not force enough to endanger the Truth that I have delivered. Unto the two firft it may be anfwered, that the negative Authority of Scnpmre is not prevalent in thofe things which are not the Fundamentals of Re- ligion. But you'll reply, though it do nnt necelTarily con- clude, yet 'tis probable if there had been another World, we fhould have had fome noiice of it in Scripture. I anfwer, 'tis as probable that the Scripture fhould have informed us of the Planets, they being very remarkable Parts of the Creation ,• and vet neither Mnfcs, nor Jch , nor the Ffdms ( the Places moil frequent in Agronomical Obfervations) nor any o- ther Scripture mention any of them but the Sun and Moon. Becacfe the Difference betwixt them and the other Stars, was known only to thofe who were learned Men, and had Skill in ^/r^wwy. As for jj?^ 3^^ that ExprelTion in Jcb'^p:^ ^^ZXH the Stars of the p^'^l^^J^' Mornings it is in the Plural Number, and therefore yejfat.i- cannot properly be applied to Fevus. And for that ca}. a. in If:i!ab b'7\"i, 'tis confeffed to be a Word of obfcure So a Reg. Interpretation, and therefore is but by guefs tranfla- p^i^^j^ ted in that Senfe. It being a true and common Rule, which « that Hebr