PRIVATE LIBRARY — OF" COMPLIMENTS OF THE AUTHOR. Feigned Insanity. REPORT OF THREE CASES, BY WILLIAM FRANCIS DREWRYs M. D., OF PETEESBURG, VA., First Assistant Physician Central State Hospital. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/feignedinsanityrOOdrew FEIGNED insanity; BY WILLIAM FliANCIS DREWliY, M. D., OF PETERSJU KtJ, VA., First Assistant Physiaian Central State Hospital. The simulation of iusaiiity is iiot an iouovation peculiar to Dioderu day schemers, though it is now Imiuently resorted to by designing criminals. In the sacred writings it is recorded that the Shepherd King of Israel "changed his behavior and feigned himself mad and scrabbled on the doors of the gate, and let his spittle fall down upon his beard , ' ' because he was ' ^sore afraid of the King of Gath . ' ' In order to escape the Trojan war, Ulysses feigned insanity by ploughing the seashore and sowing salt instead of corn, and and Lucius Junius Brutus, it is said, played the imbecile for a purpose. To detect simulation and to establish the requisite proof of it, have at all times been matters of more or less dif^icult3^ Cas- per met with many cases of the sort and appreciated the diffi- culties which they presented. Says Hammond: "N^o one, no matter how skillful an alienist he may be, is beyond the point of being imposed upon for a short time by persons assuming to have certain forms of mental derangement. Snell remarks that if a simulator preserves a complete passiveness and an obstinate si- lence, it is not impossible that insanitj^ may be so perfectly sim- ulated that detection may not be accomplished. Conolly I^or- man regards the question of simulation of insanity as "one of the most difficult with which alienists have to deal, one requiring much experience, acumen and sagacity, if a satisfactory deci- sion is to be arrived at." In his work on "Sanity and Insanity," Merciersays: "There is no form of insanity that may not be simulated by a case of ■Read before the section of Neurology and Medical Jurisprudeuce, American Medical Association, meeting at Atlanta, May, 1896. 2 (Iriiiikouiiess; aud wbeu it is uot known, from other sources of information, that these manifestations are due to drink, no ex- pert in the world, however skillful, could distinguish between the insanity that is due to alcoholic poison and the insanity that is due to other causes." Tardieu and others think, however, that nothing is more dif- ficult to counterfeit than mental disease, and that the attempt to deceive may be easily discovered by a careful observer. Conolly asserts that he can ^'hardly imagine a case which would be proof against an efficient system of observation. - When we remember that, besides the fact that scores of crimi- nals resort to the insanity dodge to escape merited punishment, the truly insane sometimes simulate insanity, that simulation itself may be an indication of mental alienation, and that occa- sionally there is a tendency of feigned insanity after long dura- tion to become real insanity, the question of accurate diagnosis may not always be unattended with uncertainty and embarrass- ment. To an experienced and competent alienist there will of course seldom be any great difficulty in arriving at a correct con- clusion, but to one with more or less limited knowledge of the various manifestations of mental diseases, a clever imposter, with the faculty of imitation well developed, would appear somewhat in the nature of a psychical problem. At all events, before giving a positive answer to so delicate and important a question as whether one is insane, and there- fore entitled to all possible humane consideration, or sane, and consequently responsible for his illegal acts, a physician should study methodically and scientifically the suspected case, keep- ing his conscience pure and undefiled under all circumstances. ^'His opinion," says an eminent authority, ^ ^should be founded upon the conception of pure knowledge, based upon observation and induction." The question of disease — that and nothing more — is the one for the physician to determine. Is the person, whose legal or tes- tamentary responsibility is in doubt, insane — is his mind affected by disease f That's the problem, the solution of which devolves upon the physician. Says Bucknill: ''The element of disease in abnormal conditions of mind is the touchstone of irresponsi- bility aud the detection of its existence or non-existence, is the peculiar and oftentimes the difficult task of the pyschologist." So, view the matter in any way you will, it can be only a question of diagnosis. 8 CASE 1. In February, 1895, Isaiah P. was indicted on the charge of house-breaking and larceny. While in jail awaiting his trial in the hustings court of a Virginia city, he suddenly began acting so strangely that doubt was entertained regarding his mental condition. Upon being arraigned in court his behavior was so utterly at variance with that of an ordinary sane man, he was remanded to jail and the trial of his case postponed, so that his mental condition might be investigated. The judge appointed the writer to ascertain v/hether or not the prisoner was insane. Whereupon I visited him several times, dealt with him not in the role of a secret detective, but in that of an impartial physician, and as such proceeded systematically to inform myself as full}' as possible of his history and symptoms. Sistory and Heredity. — Isaiah was born, in 1857, of negro par- entage. There was nothing of special interest connected with his early life. From childhood he was a bad, indolent fellow. Only two of his family were ever afflicted with any form of neu- rosis or of psychosis. His mother, at sixty -five, was sent to an asylum in a state of senile dementia. A younger sister died of phthisis pulmonalis, complicated with melancholia, while in a hospital. During a spree Isaiah received a blow on the right side of his head, which produced a depressed fracture, but under careful surgical treatment he made a complete recovery, the only visible results remaining being a slight depression in the cranium. On more than one occasion he was suspected of larceny, and finally, in 1888, was convicted and sentenced to five years confinement in the State penitentiary. It was claimed by his family that he had had, since the blow on the head, several epileptic fits and been at times ''curious in his ways." But in the absence of corroborative evidence these statements were accepted with a degree of reserve. Appearance, Manner and Symptoms. — A careful physical exam- ination revealed nothing of special pathologic import. His bodily condition was about normal. He came into my presence with an air of exagerated excite- ment, moved about restlessly, took no notice of his surround- ings, looked wild and uneasy, talked incessantly and foolishly. The almost exclusive subject of his foolish, incoherent gibberish was locusts. He talked about locusts nearly all the time, but when questioned he gave answers foreign to the subject of his apparent 4 or assiiiiied deliisioii, saying- he did not uiiderstaud what I meant. All questions were answered very slowly and hesita- tingly. When T told him my bnsiness his incoherence and rest- lessness became intensified. When unobserved he became quiet and composed. Odd sensations in his head were frequently complained of. He would put his hand to his head and say, "something is scrambling about in here.'' Memory and intelligence, to all appearances, were absolutely lost. Apparently he recalled nothing that had ever happened, nor remembered any person or place he had ever seen. He could not or would not distinguish one piece of money from another, nor tell a man from a woman. To every question he gave a negative or an absurd reply. For instance: (Question — Where were you born 1 Ansiver — Caught ninety-nine locusts to-day. Question — How do you feel to-day? Answer — Eat locusts with butter. Question. Let me see your tongue? Answer — Holds up his foot. Question — Did you sleep well last night? Answer — Tell him all right. Here they come. Question — Tell me about the locusts ? Answer — Had bread and shucl^s for dinner. Question — But what of the locusts f Answer — I donH understand yon. Question — How long has your mind been affected this way ? Answer — Some say forty-nine years. I say one hundred. Question — Have you heard from home lately ? Answer — Fell in the river last night. The locusts are rolling down the mountains. Let them roll. He slept well several hours every night, and frequently in the daytime after he had become very tired from constant exertion and excitement. I took occasion to remark in an undertone to the jailor that, if the patient were to sing, become uoisy at night, destructive to clothing, filthy in his habits, devoid of the sense of pain, my be- lief in his insanity would be confirmed. A few days later Isaiah had become so noisy and filthy at night that he had to be iso- lated. He had tried to be wakeful, but, negro-like, he soon fell asleep. His clothes were torn, shoes thrown away, coat reversed. &G. T thrust a needle into his iiesh at various points, without making any perceptible impression. Said he did not feel any pain at all. A few minutes later, when a needle was suddenly struck into his back, he forgot to be insensible to pain, and con- sequently jumped some distance. My notes show many and various evidences of Isaiah's clumsy effort to ''play crazy," but the above is quite sufficient to prove beyond any doubt, similation. I had no trouble in detecting the fraud. For two months — in fact, until the day he was taken to the penitentiary to serve out a 23 -year sentence — he continued his efforts to deceive. Finally, however, he acknowledged the at- tempted fraud. In my statement to the Court and jury I gave, in substance, the following as the grounds upon which I based my opinions : 1. There was no prodromal stage of indisposition, malaise or de- pression preceding the sudden outbreak. The attack occurred in the midst of normal health . He had few symptoms of any form of insanity which might begin somewhat suddenly, viz: transi- tory mania, epileptic mania, confusional insanity, acute halluci- natory insanity, alcoholic mania, none of which it is possible to counterfeit. Then, the fixedness of the form of delusion he tried to imitate would exclude any of the above types of insanity. 2. Sudden development of a fixed delusion regarding one par- ticular subject is not consistent with the clinical history of any known form of insanity; for paranoia, monomania or delusional insanity, is of slow and gradual development and generally un- attended with any special excitement, loss of intelligence, &c. 3. If he were trying to appear a paranoiac or monomaniac, he overlooked many essential points; for instance, when questioned regarding his delusion, he invariably gave an answer entirely foreign to the subject; and the peculiarity of expression which so strongly marks that class of cases, was entirely wanting; and, furthermore, there was no excitement or irritability of temper when contradicted. 4. Loss of memory, reason and intelligence would occur in dementia, but the quickness with which he carried out my sug- gestions regarding the "lacking symptoms" of insanity, to say nothing about his appearance and general shrewdness, would preclude any suspicion of mental decay. 5. Contrary to what is observed in acute mania and some other forms of insanity, there was no sign of insomnia. The more in 6 teuse his restlessuess, the more profoimd the sleep which fol- lowed . 6. The hesitancy, extravagance and silliness with which he replied to simple ((uestions; the absurd, disordered ideas which llowed slowly and thoughtfully would not be exhibited in the real maniac, whose ideas form and flow rapidly, disconnectedly, and are not devoid of sense. 7. There were no physical symptoms upon which to base a di- agnosis of either functional or organic disease of the brain. The injury to the head had left no perceptible ill results, motor, sen- sory or mental. A slight depression marked the site of the blow. 8. The insanity of his mother being a psychosis of old age, could have but little effect, if any, in the offspring of her early life. But the facts that his mother was insane and that he had an in- sane and phthisical sister might be considered, in connection with the possible effects of the blow on the head, sufficient grounds upon which a neurotic diathesis or nervous instability might be based. It is of course possible that the head injury might have caused some moral deficiency. 9. The order of development and the assumed symptoms failed to conform to the complete clinical picture of any recognized type of mental disease. 10. The motive for feigning was not overlooked, though that was of secondary importance when compared with the history and symptoms of the case. CASE 2. Another instance of a criminal trying to escape the stern edict of the law by pretending to be insane, has lately come under my personal observation. In this case, however, the ultimate pur- pose of the malingerer was accomplished. Isaac H., a negro youth, had served a few months of an 18- year sentence in the state prison, for murder. He assumed the role of a madman, and by taking advantage of the lax and crude method of adjudging one insane in Virginia, succeeded in gaining admission to the insane asylum, where no special ar- rangements are provided for the custody of insane criminals. Every possible precaution was exercised to prevent his escape, yet he, after a short sojourn, very ingeniously gained his liberty and has never since been heard of. We had diagnosed the case correctly and were contemplating returning the prisoner to his legitimate abode. I have not time here to make a thor- ough analysis of the case. Suffice it to say, he so far overacted 7 the part, and behaved so differently from any other case of acute mania — the form of insanity he was trying- to counterfeit — the deception was too flagrant. The history of the case, the clumsy, overacted symptoms, the motive, were all carefully studied, and by a process of elimina- tion, no type of insanity was left to fit his case. In the words of the distinguished Dr. Ohapin, of Philadelphia, "The method of arriving at a conclusion is, bring together all the features in the history and manifestations of the case and then decide whether the case corresponds to a type of insanity, which in all of its features could not be simulated except by a trained alienist. In this way a mistake will rarely be made." CASE Some years ago there was admitted into the Central Hospital a 3^oung colored girl, of intelligence above the average of her race, and with a physical formation well nigh perfect. Her case had been diagnosed "epileptic insanity." It was some time before I had an opportunity of seeing her "in a fit." From the post-epileptic condition I had serious doubts about the genuineness of the epilepsy. Eventually I saw her repeatedly in her "terrible attacks," as her family had des- ignated the seizures. She would cry out suddenly, then fall, snap her jaws together, make a noise like the bark of a dog, foam at the mouth, and act most maniacally, &c. Then she would pass in a convulsive state, jerk violently, tear off all her clothes, assume the opis- thotonos position, grind her teeth, strike and snap at everything in reach, and finally pass into a quiet sleep. These violent at- tacks would continue sometimes for an hour or two, after which the patient would become quiet and composed, her only com- plaint being that she felt sore. Said she knew nothing of the at tacks, when they came on or how they affected her, but ex- pressed great mortification on account of her affliction. I noticed that the fall was rather guarded, that she never bit her tongue or hurt herself in any way, that the sphincters were never relaxed, that the pupils were in every way normal, the iris not insensible to light. It was evident that sensory percep- tion existed. She became bathed in hot perspiration, and seemed to be well nigh exhausted. The assumed tonic and clonic convulsions were by no means like those seen in real epilepsy. The post-epileptic condition she made no attempt to imitate. 8 The girl was carefully uursed for some time, but after watch- ing her curious manoeuvres for a few times, I told her that she was feigning and that the next attack she had I should put her in a room and pay no attention to her whatever. My threat was promptly carried into execution, and the effect was all that could have been desired. She was soon sent home, got married, though has never had any children, and has ever since remained free from that ''epi- leptic insanity" which she palmed oft* so successfully on some of her friends for the sole purpose, as far as I could discern, of arousing sympathy. There was doubtless some hysteria in her case. That there is no established rule or test by which feigned in- sanity may be detected, but that each case must be decided upon according to the history and symptoms presented, cannot be well denied. Alienists everywhere will bear me out in these asser- tions. The individual whose sanity or insanity is being ques- tioned should constitute the chief object of the investigation. Whenever there is any doubt about the mental condition of one charged with crime, it would be well, in my humble judg- ment, for the court to select a committee of competent alienists to investigate the case and report in writing the result of their examinations and deliberations. This need not preclude a cross- examination . In Russia and elsewhere methods similar to this prevail. In some of the countries there is a regular court physician who de- cides all doubtful medical cases. It has been advocated in some quarters that there be appointed state experts in insanity to act in all cases where an element of uncertainty exists. But the best plan, probably, would be to transfer the suspect to an insane asylum and keep him there, under proper safe- guard, for a specified time, in order that the attending physicians may determine the question of real or counterfeited insanity. For the reasons that the position often taken by lawyers is so entirely at variance with the true conception of the disease — in- sanity, — that medical witnesses, who have no special knowl- edge of insanity, are often called upon to give expert testimony, and that physicians are sometimes utilized by shrewd counsel, for partizan or for sinister purposes, that juries composed entirely of laymen are not competent to try a case which involves a ques- tion of mental alienation — brain disease, — and finally and chiefly, that the ends of justice and mercy are sometimes thwarted, our system of medical jurisprudence of insanity is in need of revision. r MED, CENTER UBi HISTORIOAU COUUECTlQtj