•mJ^'^J^ DUKE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY The Glenn Negley Collection of Utopian Literature Digitized by the Internet Arciiive in 2010 witii funding from Duke University Libraries http://www.archive.org/details/facetimiscellaOOIione FACETIiE AND MISCELLANIES. By WILLIAM HONE. i©itt) ^ I J l'^ 8 joy, And joy : For his prac - ti-cal com ■ fort and joy! He ' turii'd his back upon himself And straight to ' Lunnun' came, To two two-sided Lawyers With tidings of the same, That our own land must ' prostrate stand' Unless we praise his name — For his * practical' comfort and joy! " Go fear not," said his L p " Let nothing you affright ; " Go draw your quills, and draw six JBillSy " Put out yon blaze of light : *' I'm able to advance you, " Go stamp it out then quite — " And give me some * features' of joy!" The Lawyers at those tidings Rejoiced much iii mindj And left their friends a-staring To go and raise the wind, And straight went to the Taxing-men And said " the Bills come find — " For ' fundamental' comfort and joy '/' The Lawyers found majorities To do as they did say, They found them at their mangers Like oxen at their hay, Some lying, and some kneeling down, All to L d C h For his ' practical' comfort and joy ! With sudden joy and gladness Rat G — ff — d was beguiled, They each sat at his L p's side, He patted them and smiled ; Yet C — pi — y, on his nether end, Sat like a new born Child, — But without either comfort or joy ! He thought upon his Father, His virtues and his fame. And how that father hoped from him For glory to his name. And as his chin dropp'd on his breast. His pale cheeks burn'd with shame : — He'll never more know comfort or joy ! Lord C li doth rule yon House, And all who there do reign : They've let us live this Christmas time — D'ye think they will again ? They say they are our masters — That's neither here, nor there: God send us all a happy new year ! End of the Carol. THE DOCTOR." " His name's the Doctor." A PARODY WRITTEN BY THE RIGHT HONORABLE GEORGE CANNING, M. P. Lord FOLKESTONE confessed that there had been a smile on his countenance at one part of the right lionorable gentleman (Mr. CANNING)'s speech, and it seemed to him very ex. traordinary, even after tl>e reconciliation that had taken place, to hear the right honorable gentleman stand up for the talents of that poor "Doctor" (Lord SIDMOUTH), who has so long been the butt of his most bitter and unsparing ridicule (loud laughter and shouts of hear, hear). Whether in poetry or prose, the great object of his derision, and that for want of ability and sense, was the noble lord whom he (Mr. CAKNING) had so strenuously defended that night; and now forsooth, he wondered that auy person could object to confide unlimited power in the iiaods of a person, according to his own former opinions, so likely to be duped and misled (hear, hear). Yes, the house would remember the lines in which, at different times, the right honorable gentleman (Mr. CANNING), had been pleased to panegyrize his (Mr. CANNING's) nahXe friend (Lord SIDMOUTH) of which the following were not the worst:— " I showed myself jsn/rae Doctor to the country; My ends attain'd, my only aim has been To keep my place, and gild my humble name." — (A loud laugh) Yes, this was the view the right honorable gentleman had once drawn of his noble friend, who was then described by him thus: — " Wy name's the Doctor; on the Berkshire hills," &c. \_See the Parody below for the remainder of Lord Folkestone's Quotation— For his Lordship's Speech, see Evans's Debates, 1817, p. J568.] Ml/ name's THE DOCTOR; on the Berkshire hills Ml/ father purged his patients — a wise man, Whose constant care was to increase his store, And keep his eldest son — myself —at home. But I had heard of Politics, and long'd To sit within the Commons' House, and get A place, and luck gave what my sire denied. Some tliirteen years ago, or ere my fingers Had learn'd to mix a potion, or to bleed, IJlatterd Pitt: I cring'd, and sneak" d, and fawn d^ And thus became the Speaker. I alone, With pompous gait, and peruke full of wisdom, Th' unruly members could control, or call The House to order. Tir'd of the Chair, I sought a bolder flight, And, grasping at his power, I struck my friend, Who held that place which now I've made my own. Proud of my triumph, I disdain'd to court The patron hand which fed me — or to seem Grateful to him who rais'd me into notice. And, when the King had call'd his Parliament To meet him here conven'd in Westminster, With all my fam'ly crowding at my heels. My brothers, cousins, followers and my son, I show'd myself Prime Doctor to the country. My ends attain d my only aim has been To keep my place — and gild my humhle name! " Brother, brother, we are both in the wrong !" — Peach'etn and Loekit, End of '' The Doctor.' TO THE READER. THE AUTHOR OF THE POLITICAL HOUSE THAT JACK BUILT, perceiving the multitude of attempts at Imitation and Imposture, occasioned by the unparalleled sale of that Jeu d^ Esprit, injustice to the public and to himself, respect- fully states, that, induced by nearly forty years of the most confidential intimacy with Mr. HONE, and by the warmest friendship and affection for him and his family, he originally selected him for his publisJier exclusively ; that he has not suffered, nor will he suffer, a line of his writing to pass into the hands of any other Bookseller; and that his last, and owing to imperative claims upon his pen of a higher order, possibly his very last production in that way, will be found in The MAN IN THE MOON. mlt ejrtraorOmarp* FREEHOLD PUBLIC HOUSES; Divided into Lots for tlie convenieuce of Purcliaser:?. TO BE SOLD by Mr. HONE, at his House, No. 45, Liidgate Hill, THIS DAY, and following days until entirely disposed of, AN EXTENSIVE UNENCUMBERED FREEHOLD PROPERTY, in separate Lots. Each comprising a Capital well-accnstomed bustling Free Public House, most desirably situated, being thoroughly established in the very heart of England, and called by the Name or Sign of " The House that Jack Built." Served Forty Thousand Customers in the course of Six Weeks. DravFs the Choicest Spirits, and is not in the mixing or whine way. The Feathers and Wellington Arms combining to injure this property by setting up Houses of III Fame, under tbe same sign, the Public are cautioned against them ; they are easily known from the original House by their Customers being few in number, and of a description better understood than expressed. The present is an undeniable opportunity to persons wishing to improve their affairs, or desirous of entering into the public line ; there being no Fixtures and the Coming-in easy Immediate possession will be given in consideration of One Shilling of good and lawful money of the Realm, paid to any of the Booksellers of the United Kingdom. *:/.* May be viewed ; and Particulars had as above. UNIVERSITY LITERATURE.— With Thirteen Cuts, price is. THE FORTY-EIGHTH EDITION OF THE POLITICAL HOUSE THAT JACK BUILT. %* This Publication was entered at Stationers' Hall, and Copies were duly delivered, accordiiij.' to Act of Parliament, one beinj; for the British Museum; yet it is held in such estimation by all ranks, from the mansion to the cottage, including men of hif;h classical and literary attainment, that it is coveted by eminent and learned bodies for the purpose of being preserved and deposited in the other National Libraries, as appears by the foUovring notice: — (COPY.) London, Jan. 26, 1820. Sir — I am authorised and requested to demand of you nine copies of the un- dermentioned Work — The Political House that Jack Built — for the use of the following Libraries and Universities : — Bodleian ; Cambridge ; Sion Col- lege ; Edinburgh; Advocates' Library, Edinburgh; Glasgow; Aberdeen; St. Andrew's; Trinity College, and the King's Inns, Dublin. I am. Sir, your obedient servant, GEORGE GREENHILL, Warehouse-keeper to the Company of Stationers. To Mr. WM. HONE, Ludgate-hill. This " authorized" and official " demand" on behalf of the Universities and Public Libraries, was immediately complied with ; and to save those distin- guished bodies the trouble of a similar application for " THE MAN IN THE MOON," copies of that work were also sent with the copies of the Political House that Jack Built, so demanded " for their use." Ut A SUPERIOR EDITION OF THE POLITICAL HOUSE THAT JACK BUILT, is now published, printed on fine Vellum Drawing Paper, with the Cuts handsomeltj COLOURED, Price 3s. — The same Edition plain, Price 2s. Withdrawn from the Press, A LETTER TO THE SOLICITOR GENERAL. By WILLIAM HONE. *:f.* Since the announcement of this Publication, the attack of the Solicitor- General upon the Juries of my Country has drawn down upon that Gentleman, within the walls of Parliament, such deserved animadversion as to render super- fluous any interference on my part. Two years hare elapsed since I broke away from the toils ; and it seems the escape of the destined victim is never to be forgiven ! The cause of which th« Solicitor-General is unexpectedly the gratuitous advocate, has taken appropriate refuge in the snug precincts of Gatton. There let it wither! The verdicts of my Juries require no other vindication than a faithful recital of the grounds on which they were founded. From the period at which those verdicts were pronounced, and with a view to that vindication, I have been un- remittingly employed in the collection and arrangement of rare and curious materials which the Solicitor-General's attack will induce me to extend to A COMPLETE HISTORY OF PARODY. This History I purpose to bring out, very speedily, with extensive graphic illus- trations, and I flatter myself it will answer the various purposes of satisfying the expectations of my numerous and respectable subscribers — of justifying my own motives in publishing the Parodies — of throwing a strong light upon the pre- sumable motives of my prosecutors in singling me out from my Noble and Right Honorable Fellow Parodists — of holding up Trial by Jury to the increased love and veneration of the British People — and above all, of making every calumny upon the verdicts of three successive, honorable, and intelligent Juries recoil upon the slanderer, be he who he may, that dares to asperse them. W. HONE. Ludgate-Hill, March, 1820. Printed by W. Hone, 45, Lud§ate-Hill. THE QUEEN'S 9i ji5ational Cop, WITH FOURTEEN STEP SCENES; AND ILLUSTI^\T10NS IN VERSE, WITH EIGHTEEN OTHER CUTS. BY THE AUTHOR OF - THE POLITICAL HOUSE THAT JACK BUILT." TliP question is not merely whether the Queen shall havfi her rights, but whether the ri-hts of any iE(livi.1unl in the kingdom siiall be free from violation." Her Majci(j/s An LONDON: PRINTED FOR WILLIAM HONE, 45, LUDGATE-HILL. 1821. ONE SHILLING. rnniPvJ by W. lIoDP. 45, L\idgat»Hll\. I»udoc. THE PRESS, invented much about the same time vith the Reformation, hath done more mischief to the discipline of our Churcli, than all the doctrine can make amends for. 'Twas an happy time, when all learning was in manuscript, and some little officer did keeo the keys of the library ! Now, since PRINTING came into the world, such is the mischief, that a man can- not write a hook but presently he is answered! There have been ways found out iofine not the people, but even the grounds and fields where they assembled: but no art yet could pre- vent these SEDITIOUS MEETINGS OF LETTERS ! Two or three brawny fellows in a corocr \rithmeer ink and elbow-grease, do more harm than an hundred systematic divines. Their uely printing fetters, that look but like so many rotten teeth, how oft have they been pulled out by the public tooth- drawers! And yet these rascally operators of the press have got a trick to fasten them again in a few minutes, that they grow as firm a set, and as biting and talkative as ever! O PRINTING! how hast thou" disturbed the peace!" Lead, when moulded into bullets is not 80 mortal as when founded into letters! There was a mistake sure in the story of Cadmus- and the serpent's teeth which he sowed, were nothing else but the letters which he invented. Marcell's Rehearsal transprosed, 4to, 1672. Being marked only with four and twenty letters,— variously transposed by the help of a PRINTING PRESS,— PAPER works miracles. The Devil dares no more come near a Stationcr't heap, or a Printer's Office, than Rati dare put their noses into a Cheesemonger's Shop. A Whip for the Devil, iSfig. p. 92. THE SHOWMAN. Lapies and Gentlemen, Walk up I walk up ! and see the CuRiosiTiES and Creatures — all alive ! alive O ! Walk up ! — now's your time ! — otili/ a shilling. Please to walk up ! Here is the strangest and most wonderful artificial Cabinet in Europe! — madeof NOTHiNG^but lacker* d brass ^ turnery y and papier mache — all fret uork and varnish, held together by steel points ! — very crazy, but very curious ! Please to walk in, Ladies and Gentlemen — it's well worth seeing! Here are the most wonderful of all wonderful Livr ING Animals. 'J ake care ! Don't go within their reach — they mind nobody but me ! A short time ago they got loose, and, with some other vermin that came from their holes and corners, desperately attacked a Lady of Quality; but, as luck would have it, 7, and my 'four and twenty men^ happened to come in at the very moment; — we '- pulVd' away, and pre- vented 'em from doing her a serious mischief. Though they look tame, their vicious dispositions are unchanged. If any thing was to happen to me, they'd soon break out again, and shew their natural ferocity, i'm in continual danger from 'em myself — for if I didn't watch 'em closely they'd destroy me. As the clown says, * there never was such tioies,' — so there's no telling what tricks they may play yet. Ladies and Gentlemen, — these animals have been exhibited at Court, before the King, and all the Royal Family ! Indeed His Majesty is so fond of 'em that he often sees 'em in pri' vate, and feeds 'em ; and he is so diverted by 'em that he has been pleased to express his gracious approbation of all their motions. But they're as cunning as the old one himself! Bless you, he does not know a thousandth part of their tricks. You, Ladies and Gentlemen, may see 'em just as they are! — the Beasts and Reptiles— all alive! alive O! and the Big Booby — all a-light ! a-light O ! Walk in. Ladies and Gentlemen ! walk in ! ji^ist a-going to Ijegin.. Stir 'em up ! Stir 'era up there with the long pole ! Before I describe the Animals, please to look at the Siiow-Cloth opposite g^ The Curiosities have lalels under them, which the com- pany can read. COURT VERMIN that buzz round And fly-blow the Kiug's car; make him suspect His wisest, faithfullest, best counsellors — Who, for themselves and their dependants, seize AH places, and all profits; and who wrest. To tlieir own ends, the statutes of the land, Or safely break them. Souther's Joan of Arc. b, i. U ^])e^t tttatmi^ ^ecc not to tu])C b^ to corecte otot mancrsJ anb amentie our fpupnge. Dialoges of Creatures Moralysed. Prologe. To exalt virtue, expose vice, promote truth, and help men to serious reflection, is my first moving cause and last directed end. De Foe's Review, Jto,, 1705, Preface. Oh that I dared To basket up the family of plagues That waste our vitals; peculation, sale Of honour, perjury, corruption, fraud* By forgery, by subterfuge of law. By tricks and lies Then cast them, closely bundled, every brat At tl>e right door! Cm'per. NOTE. All tiie Drawings are by Mr. George Cruikshank. " JUGLATOR REGIS." Strutt's 9p(nis, 188. — ■ a most officious Drudge, His face and gown drawn out with the same budge, His pendant Pouch, which is both large and wide, * Looks like a Letters-patent : He is as auful, as he had been sent From Moses with the eleventh commandement. Bp. Corbet's Poems, 1072, p. 3. He begins his DECISION by saying, Having had DOUBTS upon this for twenty years. Maddock's Chancery Practice, Pref. ix. He is like a tight-rope dancer, who, whenever he leans on one side, counteracts his position by a conespondiDg declination on the otheY, and, by this means, keeps himself in a most leif-satisfied equipoise. Retrospective Review, No. V. p. 115. Trust not the cunning waters of his eyes : — His eyes drop millstones. Shakspeare. BAGS. — fa Scruple Balance. J 'tis the veriest madness, to live poor. And die with Bags Gifford's Juvenal, Sat. xiv. DuBius is such a scrupulous good man — Yes — you may catch him tripping, if you can ! He would not, with a peremptory tone, Assert the nose upon his face his own. With HESITATION, admirably slow, He humbly hopes — presumes — it may be so. Through constant dread of giving truth offence, He ties up all his hearers in suspense! His sole opinion, whatsoe'er befall, Cent'ring, at last, in having — none at all. Cowper. Well! he is a nimble gentleman; set him upon Baxkes, his horse, in a saddle rampant, and it is a great question, which part of the Centaur shews better tricks. Ckvcland't Poemt, 1655, p. IBS By some the Crocodile is classed among fishes. A person bom under this Zodiacal Sign, (Pisces), shall ' be a mocker and shall be covetmis, he will say one thing and doe another, he shall find money, he will trust in his sapience, and shall have good fortune, he shall be a defender of Orphtlins and widdowes, and shall live Ixxiii year and v months after nature.' Shepheard's Kalender, 1497. c. liii. Pitty not him, but fear thyself. Though thou see the crafty elfe Tell down his silver-drops unto thee, They're counterfit, and will undoe thee. Crashaw's Poems, I670, p. 1 12- A CROCODILE. Ladies and Gentlemen, I begin the Exhibition with the Crocodile, which is of the Lizard tribe ; yet, from his facility/ of creeping through narrow and intricate wai/s, he has been classed among Ser- pents.* He has a monstrous appetite, his swallow is im- mense, and his legs are placed side-ways. It is a vulgar error to suppose that he cannot turn ; for, although he is in appearance very heavy, and his back is very strong, and proof against the hardest blows, yet he is so pliable, that he can wheel round with the utmost facility. When in his HAUNT, and apparently torpid, he sometimes utters a piteous whine of distress — almost human ; sheds tears, and, attracting the unwary, suddenly darts upon a man, and gorges him with all he has. His claws are very long and tenacious. If a victim eludes his grasp, he infallibly secures him by his fleet power. He is sometimes used for purposes of state and show, and his bags are much coveted for their peculiar qualities, t • By Lioneeus. t Goldsmith's Animated Nature, v. !83. Above the steeple shines a plate. That turns, and turns, to indicate From what point blows the weather ; Look up. Couiper. Having by much dress, and secrecy, and dissimulation, as it were periviigged* his siu, and covered his shame, lie looks afler no other innocence but concealment. Bp. South's Sermont. A MASK. — fan Incrustation — aRelique.) A shallow brain behind a serious maik. An oracle within an empty cask, A solemn fop. A sooty Film. Cottrper. The Thing on Earth Least qualified in honour, learning, worth, To occupy a sacred, awful post, In which the best and worthiest tremble most. The noYAL letters are a thing of course, A King, that would, might recommend his horse; And deans, no doubt, and chapters, with one voice, As bound in duty, would confirm the choice. *********** A piece of mere Church-furniture at best. Cowpcr, • There is a similarity, amounting almost to absolute identity, in the two Greek words that signify an Impostor aud a Pa-iwis'.— iva,^-a.iio) — Pcrixvig. Hederlci Lexicon, There are a number of us creep Into this world, to eat and sleep ; And know no reason why they're born. But merely to consume the corn. Watts on Hor. L. i. Ep. ii. 27. Very grievous were they ; before them there were no such locusts as they, neither after them shall be such; for they covered the face of the whole earth, so that the land was darkened. Ejcodus, X. 11, 15. THE LOCUST. Ladies and Gentlemen, The Locust is a destructive insect, of the Grill us tribe. They are so numerous, and so rapacious, that they may be compared to an army, pursuing its march to devour the fruits of the earth, as an instrument of divine displeasure towards a devoted country. They have leaders, who direct their motions in preying on the labours of man in fertile regions. No insect is more formidable in places where they breed : for they wither whatever they touch. It is im- possible to recount the terrible devastations which historians and travellers relate that they have committed at different times, in various parts of the world. Many are so venomous^ that persons handling them are immediately stung, and seized with shivering and trembling ; but it has been discovered that, in most cases, their hateful qualities are completely assuaged hy palm oil.* • Goldsmith, vi. 21. It preysupon and destroys itself with its own poison. It is of so malignant and ruinouia nature, that it ruins itself with the rest; and with rage mangles and tears itself to pieces; Montaigne, v. 3. c. xi. A SCORPION. Ladies and Gentlemen, The Scorpion is a reptile that resembles the co7?2mon lobster, but is much more hideous. They are very terrible to mankind, on account of their size and malignity, and their large crooked stings. They often assault and kill people in their houses. In Italy, and some other parts of Europe, they are the greatest pests of mankind ; but their venom is most dreadful in the East. An inferior species sally forth at certain seasons, in battalions; — scale houses that stand in the way of their march ; — wind along the course of rivers; — and on their retreat entrench themselves. Scorpions are so iras- cible, that they will attempt to sting a constable's staff; yet even a harmless little mouse* destroyed three of them, one after the other, by acting on the defensive, survived their venomous wounds, and seemed pleased with its victory. When in a confined space, they exert all their rage against each other, and there is nothing to be seen but universal carnage. If this mutual destruction did not prevail, they would multiply so fast as to render some countries uninhabit- able, f • Confined for the si»ke of experiment in a vessel, by Mauper tuis. t Goldsmith, v. 428. THE LOBSTER. — ■ they preferre Broiles before Rest, and place their Peace in Warre, DuBarttu, Ito. 151. Ladies and Gentlemen, The Lobster is very similar to the scorpion. It is armed with two great claws, by the help of which it moves itself forwards . They entrench themselves in places that can be easily defended, where they acquire defensive and offensive armour. They issue forth from their fortresses in hope of plunder^ and to surprise such inadvertent and weak animals as come within their reach. They have little to apprehend except from each other, the more powerful being formidable enemies to the weaker. They sometimes continue in the same habitations for a long time together; in general they get nezi) coats once a year. When in hot water they make a great noise, attack any one that puts a hand towards them, and know- ing their danger, use violent efforts to escape. In a sufficient heat they change their colours.* • Goldsmith, v, l63. ^•'•^^^ with huge fat places stored, A prop that helps to shoulder up the state. Tom of Bedlam, folio. 1701. p. i. a Crutch that helps the weak along, Supports the_f£e6k— but retards the strong. Smith. He knows not what it is to feel witliin A compreheusive faculty, that grasps Great purposes with ease, that turns aud wields, Almost witliout an effort, plans too vast For his conception, which he cannot move. Cowper. One of that class of individuals of but moderate talents, who by habitual exercise of their facul- ties are enabled to figure in the world by mere imitation; to become learned moralists, jurists, and theologians; to go through the ceremonies of professional life with an imposing gravity and regularity, and to run round the mill-horse circle of routine with a scrupulous precision. Sir C. Morgan's Phil, of life, 370. A PRIME CRUTCH — (From the Westminster Infirmary — Upper Ward). He fondly ' imitates' that wondrous Lad, That durst assay the sun's bright flaming team ; Spite of whose feeble hands, the horses mad Fling down on burning earth the scorching beam ; — So MADE thejlame in which himself was Jived ; The World the bonfire was — when he expired!* Like HIM of Ephesus, he had what he desired. Fletcher's Puiple Island. * The * Lad* died in the midst of war, ejaculating heaven to save the country from the miseries of his system of misrule. I don't thiuk myself obliged to play tricks with my own neck, by putting it under his feet, to inform myself whether he wears sparrow-bilU in his shoes or no. AsgiWs Defence, 1712, P- 15. THE OPOSSUM. Ladies and Gentlemen, This is a quick climbing animal ; but is, in other respects, heaxiy and helpless. When it is pursued on level ground and overtaken, it feigns itself dead, to deceive the hunters. A faculty in its seat, enables it to suspend itself from a high branch, by that part, for a long time together; and, in this position, vt^atching for whatever is weak that comes within its reach, it falls upon it and usually destroys it. Hy this elevating power in its tiether end, it not only seizes its prey more securely, bi.i preserves itself from pursuers ; look- ing down on them, in a sort of upright position, heels up- wards. It is very domesticated, but proves a disagreeable inmate, from its scent; which, however fragrant in *ma// quan- tities, is uniformly ungrateful when copiously supplied. It is a BOHOUGHiNG creature.* * Goldsmith, iii. 322, Stedmau's Surinam. Sbaw's Zoology. Full of business, bustle, and chicanery; Dibdin's Bibl. Decam, iii. 301. An odious and vile kind of creatures that fly about the House ; B. Joruon^s Diacov. They seem — descending', at some direful blow, To nibble brinutone in the realms below ! Salmagundi, 13g. Suppose one to be " boring" ou one side for two hours, and his op(.'Oiie'it to be " bothering" for a like period on the other side, what must be the consequence? Sir Jos. Yorke, in H. of Com. March 30, 1821. Of torrent tongue, and never blushing face ; Knaves, who, in truth's despite. Can white to black transform, and black to white! Gifford's Juvenal, Sat. iii. Wheu they were fewer, men might havp had a Lordship safely conveyed to them in a piece of parchment no bigger than your hand, though several sheets will not do it safely in this wiser age. IVallon's Angler, (4to. Bagster) gs. They'll argue as confidently as if they spoke gospel instead of law ; tlicv'll cite you six hundred several Precedents, though not one of them come near to the casein hand; they'll muster up the authority of Judgments, Deeds, Glosses, and Reports, and tumble over so many dusry Records, that they make their employ, though iu itself easy, the greatest slavery imaginable; always ac. counting tliat tlie best plea which they have took most pains for. Erasmus of Folly, 96. In otlier countries, they make laws upon laws and add precepts upon precepts, till the endless number of them makes the fundamental part to be forgotten ; leaving nothing but a confused lieap of explanations, which may cause ignorant people to doubt whether tliere is really any thing meant by the laws or not. Bp. Berkeley's Oaudenlio di Lucca, I66. In the country of the Furr'd Lau-cats, they gripe all, derour all, couskite all, burn all, draw all, hang all, quarter all, behead all, murder all, imprison all, waste all, and ruin .-ill, without the least notice of right or wrong : for among them vice is called virtue ; wickedness, piety ; trea- son, loyally ; lobhery, justice: Plunder is iheir motto; and all this they do, because they dare. ~ Gripe-menall, the Chief of the Furr'd Law-cats, said to Pautagruel ' Our Laws are like 1 obwebs ; your silly little flies are stopt, caught, and destroy'd therein, but your stronger ones break them, and force and carry them which way they please. Don't think wc are so mad as to set up our nets to snap up your^eat Robbers and tyrants : no, they are somewhat too hard for ui, tliere's no u^eddling with tliem; for they will make no more of us, thau we make of the little ones.'— Rabelais, b. v. c. r\. xii. BLACK RATS.— fSlufed.J Ladies and Gentlemen, These are most pernicious animals. They bo- KOUGH, and prey on our food, drink, clothing, furniture, live-stock, and every convenience of life ; furnishing their residences with the plunder of our property. They have particular haunts, to which they entice each other in large numbers, for the sake of prey,- where they often do incre- dible damage to our mounds, and undermine the strongest embankments. Sometimes they hoard their plunder in nests, that they make at a distance from their usual places of congre- gating.* They are very bold and fierce. Instead of waiting for an attack, they usually become the aggressors, and, seizing their adversaries hy the lips, inflict dangerous, and even deadly wounds. While they subsist on our industry, and increase our terrors, they make no grateful returns, and, therefore, mankind have studied various ways for diminishing their numbers ; but their cunning discovers the most distant dan- ger, and if any are disturbed or attacked, in an unusual man- ner, the rest take the alarm, and, becoming exceedingly shy, and wary, elude the most ingenious devices of their pursuers. When, unhappily, you come in contact with one of these vermin, the best way of dispatching it is by a single squeeze ; but novices who hesitate, are sure to prove sufferers. They have been found on a bench, so interwoven by their tails, that bi/ reason of their entanglement, they could not part.f A DEAD RAT, bi/ altering the look of his head and the ap- pearance of his skin, may be transformed into the appearance of a much more powerful animal; and this. Ladies and Gentlemen, has been considered a master piece in cheating.^ • White's Selborne,4to. 75. t Letters from Bodleian Library, i. 12, X Ibid.ii, 160, note. See also Ooldsmith, iii. i5g. A bait, sncti wretches to beguile. C Spenser. Cadger, n. s. A Law Character. One of " The blessiugs of this most indebted land." • • • Useless in Lim alike both braia and speech. Fate having plac'd all truth above his reach. Pierce Egan. Cotrper. A most damnable swearer and inventor of new oaths. A tongae-libelling lad of the sea— lie matters not the truth of any thing he speaks; but is prone to fasten his stings in the reputatioo of those that would scorn to be like him. I wonder to see this unquiet disposition in a brute crea- ture—a Swill-tub, Pell't Improvement of the Sea, I6g5, p. 101, et ttq. A CADGE ANCHOR.— /^^ Remora— a sucking Fish. J What have we here ? a man or a fish ? A Fish : he smells like a fish ; a very ancient and fish-like smell ; a kind of, not of the newest, Poor John. Were I in England now (as once I was) and had but this fish painted, not a holiday fool there but would give a piece of silver : there would this monster make a man ; any strange beast there makes a man. His gabbling voice is to utter foul speeches, and to de- tract. He is as disproportioned in his manners, as in his shape. As with age his body grows gglier, his mind cankers. Caliban. ReptU, with spawn abuadaat— Milton, Par.L, b.r. A WATER SCORPION. Ladies and Gentlemen, This offensive insect lives in stagnant waters, continually watching for prey. Its feelers resemble the claws of a scorpion ; the eyes are hard and prominent ^ the shoul- ders broad and Jlat. It wastes twenty times as much as its appetite requires ; one can destroy thirty or forty of the LiBELLULA kind, each as large as itself. It is nevertheless greatly overrun with a small kind of lice, which probably re- pay the injuries it inflicts elsewhere. At certain seasons it flies to distant waters in search of food; but it remains where it "was produced until fully grown, when it sallies forth in search of a companion of the other sex, and soon begets an use- less generation.* • Martyn's Diet. Nat. Hist. S vols. Folio, 1785. Goldstnitli, vi. .15. Bacon Cowper. He that maketli the wound bleed inwardt — Gives Liberty the last, the mortal shock ; Slips the slave'a collar on, aad maps the lock. What is hh Character T— A man of amiable Manners— raWA and civil. Character of the Murderer of the Mam. I never judge from Manners, for I once had my pocket picked by the civileit gentk-man I ever met with ; and one of the mildest persons I ever saw was All Pacha. Lord Byron. DIRKPATRICK. /a Petrified Pidrejaction. — a Bloodstone. J The Bloodstone is green, spotted with a bright blood red. Woodward on I'ossili. M Moral. 1 recommend it to all that read this History, that when they find their lives come up, in any degree, to a similitude of cases, they will inquire and ask thrmselves^ is not this the time to '^P'^"^' De Foe's Col. Jack, 1723, p. 399. Raised in blood. Shakspeare. THE BLOODHOUND. Ladies and Gentlemen, This is the most terrible animal in the Collection. Its character is that of decided enmiti/ to man ; it hunts down those who endeavor to regain their Libert^/, and is called the Ban Dog. When it scents a human victim it fol- lows his track with cruel perseverance, flies upon him with dreadful ferocity, and, unless dragged off, tears and rends the form until every noble feature of humanity is destroyed. It has an exquisite smell for blood. The species vary little throughout the world : there is scarcely any difference be- tween the trans-atlantic Spanish blood-hound and the Irish wolf-dog, whose ferocity has been much diminished by the animal being frequently crossed. It is still kept on some of the old ro2/ol grounds. • Edwards's West Indies. Goldsmith. Raiusford's St. Domingo. Scott's Sportsman's Ktpo6itory. Shakspeare. Cotpper. Sivift's Mem. of P. P. Rt. Hem. G. Canning. I do remember an APOTHECARY— A THREE-INCH VOOL -.-uTimannerli/ breech'd:^ Inflated aud astrut with self-conceit: — To bleed adveotured lie not, except the Poor. He had heaid of Politics, and loDg'd to get A Place ; aud now. With all his Fam'ly crowding' at his heels, His brothers, cousins, followers, and his son, He shows himself Prime Doctor. — He is that CANTING SLAVE foretold. By one Dan Barnaby of old. That would hang up his cat on Monday, For killing of a mouse on Sunday ; Who, that his beer mayn't work the latter day. Forbids the brewer's call on Saturday. Anon. A. go cart of superstitiou and prejudice, never stirring hand or foot but as he is pulled by th* wiie« aud strings of the state conjurers. Hazlitfs Table Talk, 366. His A. B. C. is a great deal belter employment for him, than tlie grave and weighty raatt«rs of state, and tlie study of politics. Dr. Bastmck against Col. J. Lilbume, Vi. SJiall I lose my Doctor f No ; he gives me the potions, and the motions. What ho I APOTHECARY! Shakspeare. THE DOCTOR.— /a Dejection. J In the»e days the grand "primum mobile" of Eugland is CANT— Cant political, Cant religioui. Cant moral, but always CANT— a thing of words, without the smallest influence upon actions; the English beinf no wiser, no better, and much poorer, and more divided among themselves, a» well as far less moral, than they were before the pievalence of this Verbal Decorum. Lord Byron on Mr. Bowles, l6. DiAKY. — April 1st. I grew melarichohy. — My father lying sick, told me, in syllables, the Philosopher's stone. — It pleased God to put me in mind that I was now placed in the condition I always desired. — I hung three spiders about my neck (for a charm). — 1 kissed the king's hand. — Cxtera desunt. EUas Ashmole's Diary. the most notorious geek and Gull That e'er Invention play'd on. Sknkspcart. THE BOOBY. Ladies and Gentlemen, The Creature you now see is a sort of Noddy of the Gull kind. Observe his uncouth form and his ludicrously wise looks ! He is the most stupid of the feathered tribe ; yet he has a voracious appetite, and an enormous swallow. You perceive that he feigns the appearance of being upright, of seeming to comprehend objects he sees, of listening to what he hears, and that he shakes his head with gravity/, as though he had a certain degree of understanding. His greatest plea- sure is in standing still. He has not sense enough to get out of People's way ; speaking to him or making motions ne- ver disturb him. There is no compelling him to the fatigue o{ changing his position till he feels a hhw ; for he keeps his PLACE till he is approached quite close, and knocked down. He is a living /«/// stop. Wlien he \s forced to walk, which is very seldom, he goes from side to side. Like others of si- milar tribes, he boroughs. In this respect the union and affection of these Creatures towards each other is won- derful; for, when undisturbed by the encroachments of men, they construct their nests as convenient as if they expected them io he permanent ; arranging their different places with such an amazing degree of uniformity, as to resemble a regular plantation. Sometimes they draw up side by side, in rank and file, and sit brooding together as if in deep counsel, on affairs of moment — their silliness and solemnity exciting invo- luntary laughter ! This burlesque takes place, in particular, about the month of November. The habits of these tribes are known tlirough those who visit the haunts they have for- saken for more obscure retreats^ where they can build aloft^ and settle in their nests at ease : a practice which confirms the remark of a great naturalist, that the presence of wen not only destroys the society of the meaner animals, but even extin- guishes their g'roce////?g' instincts. Hitherto the Booby has been considered of no service whatever; yet a similar species,* by drawing a wick through the body and lighting it, is made into a candle.i If this Booby could be thus used, the illu- mination of BOTH Houses and the public offices might be speedily effected, and the tribe he belongs to be rendered available to human purposes. At any rate a skilful tallow- chandler might try his hand at converting the Creature into A TWOPENNY FLAT For a Cobbler's Stall; ■ which, with short cotton wicks, Touch'd by th' industr'ous Cobb's Promethean art Starts into light— and maVes the lighter start ! Mother Carey's Chickens— the Peltril. Rejected Addresses. f Martjn. Bewick. The Creature's at his dirty work agaio. P^pe, THE SLOP PAIL. Ladies and Gentlemen, The "Slop Pail" being occupied by "Slop" keeping his tri'Colored cockade in it, with the hope of bleach- ing it whitCj has become more and more offensive daily, and will be kicked down.* • So ' the Jacobite Relics of Scotlaud' fall low. When MENDACITY HOGG dares his betters to brow. And turns up HIS SNOUT, with derision and scorn, At those, who, less cringing, to labor are born : — The parasite pride of his mendicant mind Pimps himself " to bewilder, and dazzles to blind;" Yet I still wish him well— for I wish that he may Learn, that wiong can't be right, and— be honest as tliey. See Dedication of Hogg's Jacobite Relits to the Highland Society, of London. The great BOOTS having been out of order, were welted, and afterwards new vamped, and polished. Dr. SouTHEY, the Farnisher, has them in hand at present, and is * doing them up* as fast as possible. Ladies and Gentlemen, I thank you for your company. Opposite to you is a description of The Monster that my people are now hunting on the Continent. When destroyed, its skin will be stuffed and preserved among the other Antiquities and Cu- riosities in the European Museum. Ladies and Gentlemen, I wish you a good day. — Keep to TR^ RIGHT. Walk steadily forward. The Ani- mals may make an uproar, but don't be alarmed ; F 11 see you safe out. Remember they are und&r my control, and cannot take a step beyond the reach of MY EYE I'll watch them tame. Skakspeare. THE BOA DESOLATOR, OR LEGITIMATE VAMPIRE. It overlays tlie continent like an ugly Incubus, sucking the blood and stopping up the breath of man's life. It claims Mankind as its property, and allows human nature to exist only upon sufferance; it haunts the understanding like a frightful spectre, and oppresses the very air with a weight that is not to be borne. HazliWs Political Essa^/s and Characters, p. Ql . This hideous Beast, not having at any time put forth all his we/n&er.y, cannot be accurately described. Every dark Cen- tury has added to his frightful bulk. More disgusting than the filthiest reptile, his strength exceeds all other brute force. His enormous, bloated, toad-like body is ferruginous :* the under surface appears of polished steel.f His cavern-like mouth is always open to devour; ' his teeth are as swords, and his jaw-teeth as knives' — as millions of bristling bayonets inter- mingled with black fangs containing mortal venom. His roar is a voice from the sepulchre. He is marked ' inform of a cross, ^% with a series of chains, intersected by the TRIANGLE,! and glittering colours, variegated with red. His aspect is cruel and terrible. He loves the dark, but never sleeps. Wherever he makes his lair, nature sickens, and man is brutified. His presence is ' plague, pestilence, and famine, battle, and murder, and sudden death.' His bite rapidly undermines the strongest Constitution, and dis- solves the whole into an entire mass of Corruption. He has no brain, but the walls of the skull emit a tinkling sound, that attracts his victims, and lulls them into passive obedi- ence. In this state he clutches them in his coils, and screws and squeezes them to destruction — slavering them oyer, and sucking in their substance at leisure. It is difficult to witness the half-stifled cries of his harmless prey, or to behold its anxiety and trepidation, while the monster writhes hideously around it, without imagining what our own case would be in the same dreadful situation. || His rapacity is increased by indulgence. He grinds, cranches, and devours whole multitudes, without being sa- tisfied. His blood is cold. His ravening maw does not digest : it is an ever-yawning grave that engulphs — a * bot- tomless pit' continually crying ' give, give /' Sometimes he • Shaw's Zoology. Art. Boa, iii. 344. t Ibid. 366. X Linnasus's Nat. Hist, by Gmelin, 8vo. (Jones) 1816. Art. Boa Constrictor, xii. 437. J Shaw's Zoology, iii. 339. fl Macleod's Wreck of the Alceste, 2yi, 295. * rests from his labors,' to admire his loathsome li7nbsy and slime them over. He has no affections : yet he appears charmed by the hum of the insects that follow him, and pleased by the tickling crawl of the meanest reptiles — permitting them to hang upon his lips, and partake of his leavings. But his real pleasure is in listening to the cries of his captives, the wail of the broken hearted, and the groans of the d^^ing. He lives in defiance and scorn of Providence, and in ha- tred to the happiness of man. When distended with human carnage, and wet with the gore of the innocent and the help- less, he lifts an impious form to heaven in solemn mockery. He was predicted of by the Seer of old, as the Beast with many heads and crowns, bearing the name of Blasphemy. The garish colours that denote his malignity, excite only horror and detestation in the lover of nature, and of his spe- cies. They are most lively when he is engaged in the work of death, and cause him to be admired by the vulgar multi- tude, learned and unlearned, who hold him sacred^ pay him divine honors, call him holj/, and fall down before him as an object of worship, while priests glorify him, and minister to him, and pray for his murderous successes in the temples. Hence the good and the wise, in all ages, have devised and practised various methods for the destruction of a Fiend that creates nothing but terror and imposture^ and between whom and rational man there is a natural antipathy. He is filled with the deadliest rage by the encreasing growth of \\\e popular Tree ; — THAT TREE, beneath whose shade the Sons of Men Shall pitch tlieir tents in peace. Brissut niurder'd, and the blameless wife Of Roland I Martyr'd patriots, spirits pure, Wept by the good, ye fell ! Yet still survives, Sown by your toil, and by your blood manured, The imperishable TREE ; and still its roots Spread, and strike deep, Southey's Joan qf Arc, b. iii. His existence is drawing to a close. It has been ascertained that the way of putting him quietly out of the world is by a 25Iacfl 5^0|Se, consisting of the four and twenty letters * of the alphabet, properly composed^ made up in certain formsy covered with sheets of white paper, and well worked in a Columbian Press. These Papers are to he forced down his * Pbilostratus relates that the Indians destroy the most monstrous serpent by spreading golden letters, on a field of red, before his hole. They dazzle and confottud him, and he is taken without difficulty. throai DAILY, morning and evening, and on every seventh day a double dose should be administered. The operation is accele- rated by the powerful exhibition of the Wood Draughts. In a short time his teeth will fall out — he will be seized with catalepsy — in the last stage of mortification, he will STING HIMSELF to death/ — and all mankind, relieved from the deadened atmosphere under which they had been gasping, will make the first use of their recovered breath, to raise an universal shout of joy at the extinction of THE LEGITIMATE VAMPIRE. Those Lords of pray'r and prey— that band of Kings, That Royal, rav'ning BEAST, whose vampire wings O'er sleeping Europe treacherously brood, And Can her into dreams of promu'd good, Ot Hope, of Freedenn— but to drain her blood' Maore. The End. Ludgate-hill, London, 1821. CATALOGUE WILLIAM HONE'S PUBLICATIONS. *^* Some of the IVorks in this Catalogue are nearly out of Print, and WILL NOT BE REPRINTED. Jl3elu euitions OF riiii WOOD CUT WORKS. One Shilling each. POLITICAL HOUSE THAT JACK BUILT, 13 Cuts. MAN IN THE MOON, 15 Cuts. QUEEN'S MATRIMONIAL LADDER, 18 Cuts. NON MI RICORDO! 3 Cuts— 6i. All the Drawings are BY MR. GEORGE CRUIKSHANK. •«* Fiue EditioiUi Colored, of the ' House that Jack built/ and the ' Matrimonial Ladder,' PriceSs. — The ' Man in the Moon,' 2s. — ' Hon mi Ricordo!' 1*. IVith a Cut— Price U. 6d. THE SPIRIT OF DESPOTISM. •«• The Rare and Extraordinary Book, beairing the above title, was privately printed without the oame of priuter or bookseller, and so effectually SUPPRESSED, that tliere are only two copies of it besides my own in existence.— Its real value consists in exhibiting an entire and luminous view of the causes and conse- quences of Despotic Power. Its enthusiastic and glowing Love of Liberty is unexcelled by any work Written since; and for clearness, richness, and beauty of style, it is Superior to every Production of the Press within the same period. All that the authoir touches he turns into gold. I regret to say, that probably 1 shall never be at liberty to disclose his name. Naturally desirous that such a work should be perused by all England, J have reprinted it verba- tUm. from my own Copy; and, (although containing as much in quantity as a volume of Gibbon's History of Rome,) it is sold for Eishteen-pence. 45, Ludeate-IJiil. WILLIAM HONE. »»• The French, in-ifantly perceiving the transcen- dent merit of the work, and its high importance at this crisis, have translated it, and it is now read throughout France with the greatest avidity. N. B. A large Paper Edition. Price 3s. 6d. in bds. Price Is.— fVith 2 Cuts. THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS TO GOVERN WRONG! A Satire — uith Notts, By the Author of the Political House that Jack Built. •»• A large Paper Edition. Price Is. 6d. 1. Tlie Dropt Clauses out of the Bill against the Queen. For Mr. Attorney General to peruse and settle. With a Refresher, 6rf 2. The Queen's Letter to the King^ C)d. 3. The Ghost of Chatham ; a Vision. Dedicated to the House of Peers, 6d. 4. A Speech at Dublin, in behalf of the Queen. By JOHN UNLAY, Esq. Barrister at Law, 6d. 0. The Form of Prayer, with Thanksgiving, for the happy Deliverance of her Majetty. Willi a Cut, fid. Price Is. A Full Report of THE TRIAL THE KING V. JOHN HUNT. IN THE KING'S BENCH, FEBRUARY 21, 1821. For a Libel ou the House of Common* in THE EXAMINER. With a PREFACE, being an Answer to the At- torney General's Reply BY THE SON OF THE DEFENDANT. *♦• The Trial contains Mr. JOHN HUNTS most able DEFENCE VERBATIM, as I heard him make it in persow, contending for the right of telling the plain Truth to liis Countrymen. The Preface by Mr. John Hunt's Son, is animated by the Spirit of his noble- minded father^^ W. HONE. Price Is. 6d. THE RIGHT ASSUMED BY THE JUDGES TO FINE A DEFENDANT, While making his Defence in Person, Denied : being a Short-hand Report of the important Legal Argu- ment of HENRY COOPER, Esq. Barrister at Law, in the King v. Davison, on moving for a New Trial : WITH A PREFACE. Price Is. TO THE KING. From the Author of " The King's Treatment .i°'^'"y' °f 'he Bank-note System and PAYMENTS IN GOLD. *•• "This Bank-note is by Mr. HONE, and oueht to make the hearts of the Bank Directors (if thev nave hearts) ache at the iighl."— Examiner. lu a large Octavo Volume, (containing nearly 700 pages), with an accurate Plan of St. Peter's Field, price 12s. in boards. THE WHOLE PROCEEDINGS ^,T.»^„ before the CORONERS INQUEST AT OLDHAM, &c. wi J- . ^° "^''^ ^'"'y of JOHN LEES, WHO died of Sabre Wounds received at MANCHES- „ . , TER, August 1(5, 1819; aetng the fullest and only Authe7itic Information concerning the Transactions of that fatal Day : de- lailing the Evidence on botli sides, upon Oath; the -Legal Arguments before the Coroner; his various De- cisions ; the Application to the Court of King's Bench ror a Mandamus to him to proceed; the Affidavits therecin; and the Petition of the Fatlier of the De- ^^".l c ?F''«"fnt ; with References to the Cases on the Subject, and a copious Analytical Index, laken in Short-hand, and edited by J. A. DOWLING, Price S!s. TF^F^^^w^T ^^Vl^ MANCHESTER COMMIT- rirrt>,.TA , "'^ NAMES OF THE SUFFERERS, the {'ll''^'>'^*'P^ards of 6oo killed and wounded;) of .h» n- ."•'i'^ ^"'^"^ °^ ^^^'" l-juries-an Account In 1 Vol. 8vo. Price 4s. 6d. Boards. THE EMIGRANT'S GUIDE to the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA c^iieg^ofs^^r^;^^^^;^^^- "^^ ^°^^> THE TRIAL OF ELiZ. PENNING, Munw ^l'*.\^^'"i"i^t«"Qg Poison with intent t^ Murder. Printed verbatim from the Notes of ths late Mr.SIBLV With Notes and lUostrations and •**^e Accou^ ^f the Sufferer and her Pa rents. In one vol. Hvo. Price 9s. boards MYSTERIOUS CASE OF " ELIZABETH PENNING: Beipg a Detail of extraordinary Facts discovered ^ er I'ullr TRIaT'^a';^ "" P""'^'"^ ^^°^ i.er singular IKIAL. Also, numerous Authentic Documents ; and Strictures. By JOHN WATKINs! thi" (•■ . ^^'"' ^''"-ty original Letters, wrrtten bv the unfortunate Girl un til she was put to Death. ^ Price 3s. 6d. THOUGHTS ON THE FUNDING AND PAPER SYSTEM By N. J. DENISON, Esq. MR. PHILLIPS'S SPEECHES. {^Sixpence each) viz. Guthrie v. Sterne, (Adultery.) O'Mullan v. MKorkill, (Defamation). Connaeht.iu v. Dillon, (Seduction). Creightoii v. Townsend, (Seduction). Blake V. Wilkins, (Breach of Promise). Browne v. Blake, (Adultery). On the Catholic Question. Character of Napoleon. On the Dethronement of Napoleon, (at Liver- pool). First Letter to the Editor of the Edinburgh Review. Second Letter to Ditto. J* The Speeches may be had separate as above, or collected into one Volume— Price 4s. in boards. In 1 Vol. 8io. C630 Puges) 8s. in Boards. THE REFORMISTS' REGISTER. By WILLIAM HONE. *»* Only a f ew Copies of t his Work remain unsold. VARIOUS. The Trials of the Blood Money Men in 1816, 2s. od. The History of the Blood Conspiracy in 1756. Is frial.— Wright v. Braham, (Crim. Con.) 2s. The Minister and the Mayor : A Poem, on Lord Sidmouth refusing to let Mr. Alderman Wood, whan Lord Mayor, ride in SUte through Westminster, Is. The Midnight Intruder; or, Old Nick at C a TTT^' ^ ^°^"- ^y ^^- ^' H. 1«. 6d. Official Account of the Noble Lord's Bite, id. Conrad the Corsair : a Tale, id. All Lord Byron's Poems on his Domestic Circum- stances, 23rd Edition, Is. Account of Napoleon's Deportation. "sixpence each. Lines on the Death of . By Thomas Moore, Esq The undeniable Skill between Gammon the Black and Dandy Grey Russett, (coloured, Is,) Napoleon and the Bourbons. French Principles. Poetical Address to Lord Byron by Mrs. Henrv Rolls. ■' The Regent's Honib, with Illustrations in Proie and Verse; and a coloured CUT. The Yacht for the Regent's Bofeb. A Poetical Epistle, with a coloured Cut. The Appearance of an Apparition to James Symp- son commanding him to do strange things in Pall Mall, and what he did, with a coloured Cut The Cruelties of the Algerine Pirates. Very in- teresting. With an Engraving THINGS NOT LIKELY TO HAPPEN, a Politi- cal Droll in Six Compartments, (lines and dots). Color CO oiaricaturesi BY MR. GEORGE CRUIKSHANK. 1. THE ROYAL SHAMBLES ; or the Prcress of Legitimacy, and Re-establishment of Religiod'aDd Social Order. On a Plate 22 inches wide, 3s 2. BAGS NODLE'S FEAST; a New Ballad founded ou Fact— with two illustrative Caricatures, 3. LOUIS XVIII. Climbing the Mat de Cocagne, or Soaped Pole, to bear off the Imperial Crown, 2s. *. FAST COLOURS— Pa«ence on a Mmument smiling at Grief, or the Royal Laundress washine Boney's Court Dresses, l». * ^ortcaitiT ONE SHILLING EACH. 1. LORD BYRON, «. SIR. ROBERT WILSON. 3. ELIZABETH PENNING. 4. WILLIAM NORRIS, an Insane American, ri- vetted alive in Iron, and many Years confined in that state, in a Cell in BETHLEM.-Sketched from the Life, in Bellilem^ (as he wasseen there in 1815 bv IV. Hone,) and etched by G. Cruikshank. 5. NAPOLEON, after David's original Picture, ex- hibited in London. A very good Portrait. 6. Nuptial Portraits of the Princess Charlotte aud Pnnce Leopold, (Proofs, 2j.) 7. Napoleon on his abolishing the Slave Trade (a coloured Print with Letter.Pre8s)-cuiiou3. Works Published by IVilliam Hone, 45, Ludgate-Hill. Beto eiiition— enlargeti. In Octavo, Price 6s. in Boards. THE APOCRYPHAL NEW TESTAMENT. Being all the Gospels, Epistles, and other pieces now extant, attributed in tlie first four centuries to JESUS CHRIST, his Apostles, and their Companions, and not in- cluded ill tlie New Testament, by its com- pilers. Translated and now first collected iuto One Volume. With Prefaces and Ta- bles, and various Notes and References. After the writings contained in the New Testament were selected from the numerous Gospels and Epistles then in Existence, what became of the Boulis that were rejected by the compilers ? ani^toer. In the present Work the translations of all the re- jected Books now in existence, are carefully collect- ed, and a table of all that are lost is subjoined. He, therefore, who possesses the Nov Testament itself, and the Apocryphal Nevi Testament, has, iu the two Tolumes, B collection of all the Histoiical Records re- lative to Christ and his Apostles, now in existence, that were considered sacred by any sect of Christians during thefiist four centuries after his birth. *,• Althouiih the Apocryphal New Testament Teas ■put forth without pretension or ostentatious an- JU)uncemerit, or even ordinary solicitude for its fate, ytt a laree Edition has been sold in a few Months. To this NEIV EDITION there are some additions. There is annexed to it a Table of the years wher-ein all the Books of the ' New Testament are stated to have been written ; to the Order of the Books of the ' Apocryphal New Testament' the AUTHORITIES from whence they have been taken are affixed ; and finally many errors have been corrected. A PROSPECTUS containing the Additions to •omplete the first Edition, and for the information of Inquirers respecting the work, may be had Price 6d. MR. HAZLITT'S POLITICAL ESSAYS. In 8co. Price 14s. in Boards. POLITICAL ESSAYS; with Sketches of PUBLK^ CHARACTERS. By WILLIAM HAZLITT. CONTENTS-Dedicaliou— Preface- Marquis Wei- lesley— Mr. Southey and his L:i.vs -Dottrel-catchiug —The Bourbons and Buonaparte- Vetus- The lit« War- Prince Maurice's Parrot— Congress.— Mr. Ow- en's New View— Mr. Western and Mr. Brouoham — The Distresses of the Country— Mr. Coleridge and his Sermons— Buonaparte and Muller- Macirone and the Death of Murat- Wat Tyler-The Quarterly— The Courier-Dr. Slop-The Spy System-State Pri- soners— Effects of War and Taxes— Court Influence— The Clerical Character -The Regal Character— Cha- racters of Lord Chatham-Mr. Burke- .Mr. Fox- Mr. Pitt— Examination of Mr. Maltlius's Doctrines on Population, &c.— A Parallel between Mr. Pitt and Buonaparte, written by .Mi . Coleridge, &c. &c. *«• No man has lashed political apostacy with more severity, nor c;ive>i harder blowi to tyranny and tyrants of all kinds, than MR. HAZLITT. His literary excellencies are unsurpassed by any living writer ; especially in the just conception and masterly delineation of character. His volume is a Political Jewel House. In Foolscap, 8tJ0. Price 6s, SIXTY CURIOUS .AND AUTHENTIC NARRATIVES and ANKCDOTES Kftspectiog Extraordinary Characters; Illustrative of the tendency of Credulity and Fanaticism; exem- plifying the Imperfections of Circumstantial Evidence; and recording singular instances of voluntary Human Suffering, aud Interesting Occurrences. By JOHN CECIL, Esq. TVith an Historital Plate. This most interesting little volume is so entertain- ing and select, in its facts aud language, as to render it a very agreeable companion, and au acceptable pre- sent. ^^__ A Pocket Volume, Price 5s. THE PICTURE OF THE PALAIS ROYAL: Dekcribing its Spectacles, Gaming-houses, CofTee- houses. Restaurateurs, Tabagies, Reading-rooms, Mil- hners'shops, Gamesters, Sharpers, Mouchards, Artistes, Epicures, Courtesans, Filles, and other Remarkable Objects in that High Change of the Fashionable Dissi- pation and Vice of Paris. With Characteristic Sketches, and Anecdotes of its Frequenters and Inhabitants. With a lari;e folding Coloured Engrnving. Visitors to Paris should take this work as aGuidtand Mentor. Thos« who stay at hometwill be excfediucly amused by the singularity of manners it discloses. In one Plate, Price 2s., India Proofs 4s. AUTHENTIC PORTRAITS OF LAV ALETTE, NEY. AND LABEDOYERE, This Print was tuppiested at Paris as soon as pub- lished. In One Volume 8vo. Price 8s. in Boards. POLITICAL SERMONS TO ASSES. By the late JAMES MURRAY. With a Memoir of the Author, and his Portrait. ♦,• I know not what to say more in praise of this Work, than that the pieces it contains, have been sub- jects of my reading and admiration from boyhood. Many of them werevtry scarce Durios several years of diligent research I collected them with difficulty, and have reprinted the whole at a reasonable price. Civil and religious ii.tolerance were never more successfully exposed, nor the liberty of man more stoutly contended for, than by their close reasoning, and sarcastic irony. They abound with wit and humor, and the severest invectives of honest hearted patriotism. W. HONE. In One Volume 8vo. Price 8s. THE SPEECHES Of the Right Hon. J. P. CURRAN. A NEW AND ENLARGED COLLECTION. Witli Memoirs of Mr. Curran, and his Portrait, •♦* Eloquence has perhaps never suffered a deeper loss thau by the imperfect manner iu which the Speeches of this immortal Orator have been collected. The present edition embodies his relics, and con- tains seven full speeches, with two extracts, in no other Collection. These grand efforts of oratorical geuius leave the reader's mind in awful astonishment at the daring honesty of the intrepid advocate, and disclose scenes, wherein the majestic figure of the Patriot rose in sublime and solitary pre-eminence. N.B. Orders should express " Hone's Edition." Price is. 6d. PROCEEDINGS IN AN ACTION Between The Rt. Hon. CHARLES J. FOX, Plaintiff, and JOHN HORNE TOOKE, Es(/. Defendant. A new edition.— This is perhaps the finest Specimes of Mr. Tooke's splendid talents. In 8vo. Price 4s. 6d. THE OCKAN CAVERN: A Tale of the Tonga Isles. In Three Cantos.— The interesting story selected as the grouud-work of this Peein, is in Mariner's Account of tne Customs and' Manner-s of the Inhabitants of the Tonga Islands. *' The tale is beautifully related in the Poem, and occasions feelings which a real bard only can raise.' Printed by William Houe, 45, Ludgate Hill, London. THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS TO GOVERN WRONG I DetiicateTi to tlje ^olp mmut BY THE AUTHOR OF THE POLITICAL HOUSE THAT JACK BUILT The devil will not have me damnM, lest the oil that is in me should set hell on fire.' Shakspeare. LONDON: PRINTED FOR WILLIAM HONE, 45, LUDGATE-HILL. 1 821. Eightettifitnce. Printed by W. Hone, ♦6, Ludgate-Hill, London. ©eDication. TO THE VISIBLE AND INVISIBLE MEMBERS OF THE HOLY ALLIANCE. May it please your Holinesses, When a gang of desperate ruffians disguise themselves, and take the road armed, it is a sure sign of robbery and murder ; and it becomes the duty of an honest man to raise a hue and cry^ and describe the villains. With that view, I dedicate to you this little book ; in the hope, that some who understand the d^ad lan- guage of Despotism, may be induced to translate it into the living tongues of the good people of the Continent. I pray God to take your Royalty into his imme- diate keeping. THE AUTHOR OF THE POUTICAL HOUSE THAT JACK BUILT. O ! DuLNESs, if thy sons can learn one thing, Teach but that one, sufficient for a King ; That which thy Priests, and thine alone, maintain, Which, as It dies, or lives, They fall, or reign : May ye, O Cam and Isis, preach it long, * The Right Divine of Kings to govern wrong !' Pope. It was a maxim of the constitution of this country that the King could do no wrong. He had high authority for stating that the King could not commit Folly, much less Crime. Report of a Bishop's Speech. If a King can do no wrong, why was King James II. banished i and if a King can do wrong, why the plague are we constant- ly affirming that he cannot ? Either way we should stand self- condemned, and if we are not set down as a nation of scoun- drels, we must think ourselves pretty easy under the appellation of fool J. Swift. We love The King, who loves the law, respects bis bounds. And reigns content within them : bim we serve Freely and with delight, who leaves us free : But recollecting still that he is man. We trust him not too far. King though he be, And King in England too, lie may be weak. And vain enough to be ambitious still; • May exercise amiss his proper pow'rs. Or covet more than freemen choose to grant : Beyond that mark is TREASON. COWPEK. NOTE. The Druwings are by Mr. George Cruieshank. preface* " Perish those poets, and be hush'd the song, Which with this nonsense charin'd the workl so long, That he who does no right, can do no wrong." DeFoe. 1 o condemn nonsense, especially in high places, is proper : there are ancient precedents for it. A thousand years before Christ, Nathan, a priest in the house of the Lord at Jerusalem, knew that David the Lord's anointed, had not only workedjolli/ in Israel, by committing adultery with a beautiful wo- man, but had committed crime, by causing her hus- band to be put to death. The honest priest charged both the folly and the crime upon the king ! He went up to his majesty with this Address : " Thou art the man .'" He prosecuted him at the bar of his own conscience, convicted him, and passed sentence upon him — " The sword shall not depart from thine house /" Three thousand years after this, a priest, sent into an English House of Lords by the nomination of the king, affirms there, that " he had ' high authority' for stating, that the king could not commit folly, much less crime T ( 6 ) What a scene ! A priest of the Church of Eng- land, who promised, before he received the Holy Ghost,* to lay aside the study of the world and the flesh, who received the Holy Ghost upon that condition, who had a Bible put into his hands to preach truth from, and who — with the Holy Ghost in him, took the sacrament as the most solemn of all oaths, to perform what he had promised — this Priest, who again received the Holy Ghost for the office and work of a Bishop, and again took the oath of the sacrament — this Bishop, regardless of his sacramental oath, puzzles himself behind the Treasury bench with the quillets of the English law, and forgets Nathan ! — this Right Reverend Father in God, by divine permission, studies the ' Pleas of the Crown,' tal"ks of ' high authority,' and forgets the authority of his Bible ! — bends, like \i\& folding- crook, in the presence of the king of England, and forgets Him whose kingdom is not of this world ! — stands, as stiff as his staflF, at Lonc?on— blinks Jerusalem, — squints towards archiepiscopal Canterbury — and in- culcates Passive obedience and Non-resistance ! The Doctrine of Divine Right, or ' the King can do no wrong,' is the evil genius of Liberty, the vital spark of Legitimate right, the very soul of Des- potism. It demands tl>e prostitution of moral principle, * Priests of the Church of England ' receive the Holy Ghost' at the command of the bishop on their ordination. They re- ceive it again when made Bishops. See the Form qf' Ordination. ( 7 ) sophisticates scripture, and converts the peace and good will of Christianity into envy, hatred, malice, and all uncharitableness. What it can do, may be known by what it has done. Take a hero — a ruffian who has ravaged and desolated every fair region he could penetrate — a brutal ferocious wretch, of gi- gantic form, and cruel feature, ignorant of every thing but crime ; his sword serrated by hacking the bones of the brave defenders of their country, with halters for the necks of the peaceful at his girdle : toss him an iron sceptre surmounted by the emblems of death and folly ; give him the world to crush beneath his feet ; and tell me in what age Priestcraft, standing upon the divine right of tithes, would refuse to throw the ermine of royalty over the monster's shoulders, anoint him as from the Lord, and light him up to the world as an image of the Divinity ! According to the law of England, the king can do no wrong. Mr. Justice Blackstone says, that " the Prerogative of the Crown extends not to do any in- jury; it is created for the benefit of the people; and, therefore, cannot be exerted to their prejudice."* Now, if the prerogative of tlie crown was created for the benefit of the people, is it not plain, that, should it cease to be exerted for their benefit, it would be useless ; and that, should it be extended to do them injury, it would be oppression. Will the Bishop say, that oppression is no wrong, or that if oppression should come from the royal prerogative, oppression is * Commentaries, vol. i. p. 2'iii. ( 8 ) fight ? If he does say this, I ask him, how long, after oppression should be exercised through the preroga- tive by virtually irresponsible ministers and be de- clared no wrong, he supposes that a king of England could sit on the throne, or the bishops who maintain the doctrine, sit either at its right hand in the Lords, or any where else i I tell this bishop, that though the law may not suppose it possible for a king of England to do wrong, because it intends him to do right, yet if he should do, and continue to do, op- pressive wrong, not all the bishops of England, nor all the bayonets of all the mercenaries of Europe, could keep that king upon the throne of an oppressed people against their united will. A king of England is not king in his own right, or by hereditary right. The nation is not a patri- mony. He is not king by his own power; but in right of, and by the power of the law. He is not king above the law ; but by, or under, the law. All the authority that he has, is given to him by law ; and he can only rule according to law : for were he to rule against the law, he would be king against the law, and depose himself. The law is the Sovereign, or paramount authority ; hence, a king of England is a subject ; and in this respect, he and all the people are upon a level before the law — they are all his fellow-subjects ; though, as chief magis- trate, he is the first subject of the law. A king of England who regards the happiness of the people, and his own safety, would not wish to be ( 9 ) stronger than the law founded on the public will, makes him. More strength would be unnecessary to his welfare, and hurtful to theirs. All power over others^ from the watch-box to the throne, tends to injure the understanding, and corrupt the heart. A good King would not desire unlimited power ; a bad one would abuse it. He would become mad ; and drive the people mad. A despot is a demon. Artillery and fetters with the royal robe flung over them — a cannon ball capped with the royal crown — animated by the royal will — crushing, burning, and butchering liberty, property, and human life — personify the power of an unlimited King. The ensuing satire shows the folly and danger of such power. It is a partial revival of the Jure Divino, written by Daniel De Foe in 1706. After the lapse of a century, nearly the same reason exists for the publication as the author adduced on its first appearance. It had never appeared, he says, "had not the world seemed to be going mad a se- cond time with the error of passive obedience and non-resistance." It is not precisely so now : the people have not gone mad, but a bishop has, who may bite his brethren ; and there is a slavish party of High Church zealots and pulpit casuists in the coun- try who virtually support the doctrine— although if they attempt reducing it to practice, they may dig a pit beneath the throne, and engulph the dynasty. To expose this destructive doctrine, and disentangle the threads so artfully twisted into snares for the unwary ( 10 ) by priestcraft, De Foe composed his Satire. He was the ablest politician of his day, an energetic writer, and, better than all, an honest man ; but not much of a poet. The Jure Divirio is defective in arrangement and versification. It is likewise disfi- gured by injudicious repetition ; a large portion is de- voted to the politics of the time, and it is otherwise unfit for republication entire ; but it abounds with energetic thoughts, forcible touches, and happy il- lustrations. The present is an attempt to separate the gold from the dross. The selection is carefully made ; from the parts rejected the best passages are preserved, the rhyme artd metre are somewhat bet- tered, the extracts are improved and transposed, and many additions of my own are introduced. The production scornfully rejects the slavish folly, sense- less jargon, and venal hypocrisy, which pretend that power is from God and not from the People. It defies those who draw upon scripture in support of Divine Right to show that scripture lays down any rules of political government, or enjoins any political duties ; or that it does not leave the people to deter- mine by their own reason what government and what governors are best for themselves. It is a forcible and argumentative satire against the nonsense from hole-and-corner and lawn-sleeve men ; and presents a series of peculiarly strong and quotable lines, to en- graft on the common sense of the free-minded, honest, and open-hearted of my countrymen. If it aids them in the occasional illustration and emphatic expression c n ) of their opinions, the pains 1 have taken will be re- warded. There is another reason for publishing this satire, besides the revival of Priestcraft. Its tvvinbrother is alive. Kingcraft rears up its terrific mass, muffled in the mantle of Legitimacy ; its head cowled and crowned, and dripping with the holy oil of Divine Right ; its eyes glaring deadly hate to human happi- ness ; its lips demanding worship for itself. Denoun- cing dreadful curses against the free, and yelling forth threatenings and slaughter, it stamps with its hoof, and coils together its frightful force to fall on young Liberty and squelch it. Its red right-arm is bared for the butchery of the brave who love Freedom and dare contend for it. It has prepared its chains and dug its dungeons, erected its scaffolds, and shar- pened its axes for the wise and excellent of the earth ; and its bloody banners are unfurled in insolent antici- pation of unholy triumph ! — Still nionarchs dream Of universal empire growing up From universal ruin! Blast the design, Great God of Hosts, nor let thy creatures fall, Uupitied victims at ambition's shrine ! So prayed the Bishop of London, (Porteus— not Howley) and so fervently prays, THE AUTHOR OF THE POLITICAL HOUSE THAT JACK BUILT. THE SPIRIT OF DESPOTISM. The above Rare and Extraordinary Book was privately printed in 1795, without the name of either printer or bookseller, and so effectually suppressed, that there are only two copies of it besides my own in existence. Its real value consists in exhibiting an entire and luminous view of the causes and consequences of Des- potic Power. Its enthusiastic and glowing love of Liberty is unexcelled by any work written since; and for clearness, richness, and beauty of style, it is superior to every production of the Press within the same period. All that the author touches, he turns into gold. I regret to say that most probably I shall never be at liberty to disclose his name. Naturally desirous that such a work should be perused by all England, I have reprinted it, verbatim, from my own copy ; and, although containing as much in quan- tity as a volume of Gibbon's History of Rome, it is sold for Eig] it e en-pence. WILLIAM HONE. *^t* The French, instantly perceiving the transcendent merit of the Spirit of Despotism, and its high importance at this crisis, have translated it into their language, and it is now read throughout France with the greatest avidity. I intreat some good I^eapolitan to be the benefactor of his Countrymen in hke manner. It should be in the hands of the free, and those wlio desire to be free, in all nations: — Austria, for instance. THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS TO GOVERN WRONG. BOOK I. Thus Kings were first invented, and tims Kings Were biirnish'd into heroes, and became The arbiters of this terraqueous swamp ; Storks among frogs that have but croak'd and died ! COWPER. Original Power— The ancient Gods — Tyrant-kings — The Apotheosis of James II. in the Chapel Royal — Charles II. — Paternal Government — God prescribed no Rules of Govtrnment — Origin of Kings — Saul. AnisE, O Satire ! — tune thy useful song. Silence grows criminal, when crimes grow strong; Of meaner vice, and villains, sing no more. But Monsters crown'd, and Crime enrobed with Power ! At vice's high Imperial throne begin. Relate the ancient prodigies of sin ; With pregnant phrase, and strong impartial verse. The crimes of men, and crimes of Kings rehearse! What though thy labour shall to us be vain. And the World's bondage must its time remain ; c 14 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS Let willing slaves in golden fetters lie. There's none can save the men who ivill to die. Yet some there are that would not tamely bow. Who fain would break their chains, if they knew how ; And these, from thy inspired lines, may see. How they choose bondage when they may go free. He that can levy War with all mankind. Retard the day-spring of the human mind ; Buy Justice, sell Oppression, bribe the Law, Exalt the Fool, and keep the Wise in awe ; With pious Peter,* cant of heaven's commands. Pray with his lips, and murder with his hands ; Insult the wretched, trample on the poor. And mock the miseries mankind endure ; Can ravage countries, property devour. And trample Law beneath the feet of Power ; Scorn the restraint of oaths and promised Right,t And ravel compacts in the people's sight; * Peter the Crnel, King of Castile. He married the daugh- ter of a Duke of Bourbon, whom he divorced, in order to renew his connexion with a former mistress. His excesses occasioned tlie people to dethrone hiui. He affected piety, and to govern by divine right ! t Despots seldom keep engagements. — The People of Prussia have a' promised riglW from their king of some years standing. After the Battle of Waterloo, he promised them a Constitution — but be- came a member of the Holy Alliance. In 18t4, this king, with an- other of the fraternity, the Emperor of Russia, was entertained at an expiMi.*e of 20,038^. 7s. iOd. in Guildhall Loudon, by the Coipui.iti II in Cumuion Council assenililed, wiio also pre Rented addi esses vt' ( ougratulatiou tu the worthies, on their having contributed, by encaging Napoleon, to restore what the addresses called, " the Legitimate dynasties." The result TO GOVERN WRONG. 15 That thing's a Tyrant ! — and that People Fools, Who basely bend to be that Tyrant'' s tools ! Examine llien tlie early course of things. And search the ancient roll of Tyrant Kings, When the first man usurp'd upon his kind. Assumed exotick right, assuming reigned ; Supreme in wickedness, more wicked grew ; First /orcerf a homage, then decreed it due. Trace the first Tyrants to their fancied thrones. Placed in that heaven that all their crimes disowns : — If in the Royal lists some monsters reign'd, Abhorr'd by heaven, and hated by mankind. By lust and blood exalted to a throne. For all the exquisites of Tyrant known. The meaner name of monarch they despise. Alive, usurp the throne, and dead, the skies ; Above the clouds th' incarnate devil stands. And nations worship wiih polluted hands! Old Saturn, Bacchus, and high-thundering Jove, And all the rabble of the Gods above. Whose names for their immortal crimes are fear'd, Monarchs and Tyrant-princes first appeared ; is, that the legitimate Emperor of Russia backs the crusade on the People of Naples ; and the legitimate kina; of Prussia is as little inclined to let the Prussians have a Constitution, as the Corporation of London find it convenient to return the 14,000i. of tiie Bridge-House money whicii they borrowed towards pay- ing for the feast. The '■company they kept,' and tiie money they owe in consequence, must be a satisfactory, because the only apology from the metropolis of the most free country in Europe, to the Neapolitans, for not assisting them in defending their na- tional Independence, and their new-born Liberty, against the combined attack of " the Legitimate dynasties." 16 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS By rapes and blood the path to greatness stained. By rapes and blood the glittering station gain'd ; Succeeding knaves succeeding Gods became. And sin aspired to an immortal name ! The mighty wretches dwell among the stars. And vice in virtue's glorious robes appears ; And Poets celebrate their praises there. As Indians worship Devils that they fear ! Yet let us look around the world awhile. And find a Patron-God for Albion's Isle ; Has she so many Tyrants borne in vain ? Has she no Star in the celestial train? Heaven knows, the difficulty only lies. In who's the fittest monster for the skies ! — Satire, reflect with care, due caution give. Some are dead, beware of those that live. If thou too near the present age begin. Truth will be crime, and courage will be sin ! Look back two ages, see where shines on high Great James, the modern Bacchus of the sky j But give him time before his ghost appear. Lest his uneasy fame bewray his fear : Alive, the patron of the tim'rous race. Fear in his head, and frenzy in his face j His constellation, were it felt beneath. Would make men strive to die — for fear of death ! His exaltation with his crimes begin. See how we worship in his House of Sin, Aloft — we view the Bacchanalian King ; Below — the sacred anthems daily sing; His vast excess the pencil's art displays. And triumphs in the clouds above our praise : TO GOVERN WRONG. 17 What can, with equal force, devotion move. We pray below, and He's debauch'd above !* Look lower down the galaxy and see. In yon crown'd Goat another Deity ; His orgied reel and lecherous leer outvie The old Priapian glory of the sky ; His furious lusts the other Gods deface And spread his viler image through the place j On obscene altars blaze unholy fires To him, the God of all unchaste desires If • The Banquetting House at Whitehall is now the Chapel Royal, where sermons are preached and Divine service is sung by the choir of the king's household. On the floor, are the pews for the congregation, the pulpits of the clergy, the altar with the sacramental vessels, and the other arrangements for sacred wor- ship. On the ceiling, the apotheosis of King James tlie First, painted by Rubens, represents the king in different situations crowned with the triumphs of drunkenness. James the First held the highest notions concerning Divine Right. He had a migiity desire to be a great tyrant, but was merely a great driveller. He said on a certain occasion that " there is an implicit tie among kings, whick obligelh them, though there be no other interest or particular engagement, to stick to, and RIGHT ONE ANOTHER, vpoii ayi insurrection of subjects." — How- ell's Letters, B. 1. §. 2. Letter iii. This obligation among kings to right one another, flows from their ' Right Divine to govern wrong !' The implicit tie to sufl^o- cate liberty, wherever it appears, is co-eval with tyranny but it was never openly avowed until the present concert of kings. The Holy-Alliance is — Despotism shewing itself. t It was for this king, Charles II., that the plirase, *' our re- ligious king," was invented by the Bishops. If such Vicegerents are by Heaven appointed, The Devil himself may be the Lord's anointed! De Foe, 18 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS We turn disgusted from the contemplation Nor seek more royal samples of our nation ', But leave Posterity to find the place Of other heroes, of another race. Europe, thy thrones have many a name in store. As bright in guilt as any crown'd before ; Who, turn'd to Gods, shall shine in Poets' rhymes. And faithful Hist'ry shall record their crimes. The first Paternal ruler of mankind That e'er by primogenial title reign'd. In dignity of government was high But all his kingdom was his family. His subjects — were his household and his wife ; His power — to regulate their way of life j His sway — extended not beyond his gate ; That was the limit — of his regal state ; And every son might from his rule divide. Be King himself, and by himself preside ; And when he died, the government went on In natural succession to his son. Next Families of mutual love and unity Together join'd for friendship and conwiunity ; Form'd Laws, and then the natural order was To trust some man to execute the Laws. Hence him they best could trust, they trusted — chose ; And thus a Nation and a chief arose. Both constituted by a mutual trust; The people honest and the ruler just.* 'Tis plain, when man came from his Maker's hand. He left him free, and at his own command; • No hereditary king ever reigned in the world, but to govern by laws and constitutions which were established beforeh^ came to be king. — Coke's Detection, vol. i. p. 13. i TO GOVERN WRONG. 19 Gave him the light of nature to direct. And reason,* nature's errors to inspect ; No rules of Government were e'er set down. Nature was furnish'd to direct her own ; The high unerring light of Providence, Left that to latent cause and consequence. Society to regulation tends. As naturally as means pursue their ends ; The wit of man could never yet invent, A way of life without a government; And government has always been begun. In those who, to be govern'd, gave the crown. He that would other schemes of rule contrive And search for powers the people could not give, Must seek a spring which can those powers convey. And seek a People too that will obey. At length paternal rule was less complete. And as mankind increas'd became unfit ; The petty Lords grow quarrelsome and proud. And plunge their little governments in blood. * Reason is the image of God stamped upon man at his birth, the understanding breathed iirto him with the breatli of life, and in the participation of which alone he is raised above the brute creation, and his own pliysical nature ! — Reason is the queen of the moral world, the soul of the universe, the lamp of human life, the pillar of society, the foundation ot law, the bea- con of nations, the golden chain let down from heaven, which links all animated and all intelligent natures in one common system— and, in the vain strife between fanatic innovation and fanatic prejudice, we are exhorted to dethrone this queen of the world, to blot out this light of the mind, to deface this fair co- lumn, to break in pieces this golden chain ! — HazlitVs Political Essays, p. 57. 20 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS The factious rivals on pretence of right. Urge on the people to contend and fight ; Invaded weakness to brute force submits. Oppression rages, honesty retreats. Justice gives way to power, and power prevails. And universal slavery entails. Thus broils arose, and thus the ends of life Are miss'd in Wars and undecided strife ! Scotland, till late, exemplified the plan. In many a feud, in many a Highland clan. The Chief with whoop and whistling trumpet shrill. Summons his slaves from ev'ry neighb'ring hill; Tells them, his foeman's bull has stol'n his cow. And dire revenge th' obedient vassals vow ; With mighty targe, and basket-hilted knife. Battle and blood decide the petty strife j The namelings fight, because the lord commands. And wild confusion rules th' ungovern'd lands ! The hunter -tribes, at first, wild beasts pursued. And then to chase mankind they left the wood ; Became Banditti, Captains, Chieftains, Kings, And Tyrants, by the natural course of things ! As he that ravaged most could rule the best. So he grown King that first subdued the rest. By fraud and force his guiltT/ power maintains. Wheedles mankind to please themselves with chains. With selfish Kingcraft calls it Right Divine,* And subtle Priestcraft sanctifies his line. "Priestcraft n. s. [priest and craft.] Religions frands ; management of wicked priests to gain power. — Johnson. Kingcraft n. s, [king and craft,'] Royal frauds ; Hiauagement of wicked kings to gain power. The TO GOVERN WRONG. 21 "Kings are as Gods." — Indeed ! — why then they must Like God be sacred, — but like God he Just. If in a King a vicious lust prevails. The people see it, and the Godship fails. * The greatest curses any age have known Have issued from tlie temple, or the throne ; Extent of ill from kings at first begins, But priests must aid, and consecrate their sins. The tortured subject might be heard complain, When sinking under a newr weight of chain, Or more rebellious, might pei haps repine, -^ When tax'd to dow'r a titled concubine, f- But the priest christens all a Right Divine! ^ Hoi: fValpole's Epistle from Florence. * Tlie time has been when rulers have actually claimed the title of God's vicegerents, and have been literally worshipped as gods by the servile crew of courtiers ; — men gradually bowed down by despotism from the erect port of native dignity, and driven, by fear, to crouch under the most degrading of all superstition, the political idolatry of a base fellow-creature. — After all the lan- guage of court adulation, the praises of poets and orators, the statues and monnments erected to their fame, the malignant consequences of their actions prove them to have been no other than conspirators against the improvement and happi- ness of the human race. What were their means of conduct- ing their governments, of exercising this office of Heaven's vicegerents ? Crafty, dishonest arts, oppression, extortion, and, above all,^/'e and sword. They dared to ape the thunder and lightning of Heaven, and, assisted by the machinations of the grand adversary of man, rendered their imitative contrivances for destruction more terrible and deadly than the original. Their imperial robe derived its deep crimson colour from human blood ; and the gold and diamonds of their diadems were accumulated treasures wrung from the famished bowels of the poor, born only D ^2 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS Talks he of* sacred' then, — the man's a fool ; His high pretence a joke and ridicule ; Abandon'd to his crimes he soon will find Himself abandon'd too, by all mankind ; With th' Assyrian Monarch turn'd to grass, As much a Tyrant, and as much an ass ! to toil for others, to be robbed, to be wounded, to be trodden under foot, and forgotten in an early grave. How few, in com- parison, have reached the age of three score and ten, and yet, in the midst of youth and health, their days h«ve been full of labour and sorrow. Heaven's vicegerents seldom bestowed a thought upon them, except when it was necessary either to iuveigle or to force them to take the sword and march to slaughter. Where God caused the sun to shine gaily, and scattered plenty over the land, his vicegerents diffused famine and solitude. The valley, which laughed with corn, they watered with the tear of artificial hunger and distress ; the plain that was bright with verdure, and gay with flowerets, they dyed red with gore. They operated on the world as the blast of an east wind, as a pestilence, as a deluge, as a conflagration. — It is an incontrovertible axiom, that all who are born into the world, have a right to be as happy in it as the un- avoidable evils of nature, and their own disordered passions will allow. The grand object of all good government, of all govern- ment that is not an usurpation, must be to promote this happi- ness, to assist every individual in its attainment and security. A government chiefly anxious about the emoluments of office, chiefly employed in augmenting its own power, and aggrandizing its obsequious instruments, while it neglects the comfort and safety of individuals in middle or low life, is despotic and a nui- sance. It is foundt'd on folly as well as wickedness, and, like the freaks of insanity, deals mischief and misery around, witliont be- ing able to ascertain or limit its extent and duration. If it should not be punished as criminal, let it be ro?rced as dangerous. Sitirit of Despotism, p. 90. TO GOVERN WRONG. 23 Externals take from Majesty, the rest Is but — a thing at which we laugh — a jest ! Let us to Scripture History appeal. And see what truths its ancient rolls reveal : — That great authority which Tyrants boast. As most confirming, will confound them most ! When Israel with unheard of murmurs first, Pray'd to indulgent Heaven they might be curst, Rejected God, scorn'd his Almighty rule. And made themselves their children's ridicule, A standing banter, future ages' jest. As damn'd to slavery at their own request — With what just arguments did Samuel plead. Give them the Tyrant's character to read; Explain the lust of an ungovern'd man. Show them the danger, preach to them in vain ; Tell them the wretched things they'd quickly find. Within the pleasing name of King combined ; Deign with their 'wilder'd crowds t' expostulate. And open all the dangers of their fate ! — Yet they sought ruin with unwearied pains. And begg'd for fetters, slavery, and chains ! But, it*s replied, heaven heard its suppliant's prayer. Itself choice, out the King, and plac'd him ihere ; Disown d the People's right, and fix'd their choice In providence, and not the people's voice ; From whence the claim of right by regal line. Made Israel's Kings be Kings by Right Divine. Yes, Saul ivas King by God's immediate hand — But 'twas in judgment to afflict the land ! In granting He corrected the request, A king He gave them, but withheld the rest j 24 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS Gave all that they pretended to require, But in the gift he punish'd the desire ; He gave ii plague, the very selfsame thing They ask'd, when they petition'd for a King ! For 'tis remarkable when Samuel saw. They'd have a King in spite of sense or law. He told the consequences to the land. And all the mischiefs that the Word contained; Told them, that Kings were instruments design'd. Not to improve, but to correct mankind! Told them the Tyrant would insult their peace. And plunder them of all their happiness! Told them, that Kings were but exalted thieves. Would rob men first, and then would make them slaves ! Then drew the picture of a monster crown'd, Ask'd them, if such a villain could be found,* Whether they'd like him, and their tribute bring? They answer. Yes : — let such a man be King ! And is a Tyrant King your early choice ? *' Be Kings j/owr plague !" said the Eternal's voice; * It is remarkable, that a king scarcely ever exercised tyraiv nical power over the people, but it was niiiigled with ungoverned vice in himself. Men of virtue and moderation seldom, if ever, turn tyrants. Despotic rule gives the reins to lust, and makes tbe errors of government, and the crimes of life, mix together. It is the high road to cruelty and brutalizing selfishness.— A king of France took out his watcli when he guessed that the axe was cutting off the head of liis favorite, and said, ' My dear friend must make a sad figure just now !' — A hill in Richmond Park is still shewn as remarkable for having been the station from whence Henry Vlll. eagerly looked out for the ascent of a rocket at London, announcing to tbe impatient tyrant the precise moment when one of bis wives was suffering death on the scaffold ! TO GOVERN WRONG. 25 And with this mighty curse he gave the crown. And Saul, to Israel's terror, mounts the throne ! Now, Muse, the parallel with caution bring. On what condition was this man their King ? Tho' Heaven declar'd him, heaven itself set down The sacred Postulata of the crown ; Samuel examin'd first the high record. Then dedicates the substance to the Lord. This is the coronation-oath, the bond. The steps on which the throne and kingdom stand ; For which, by future Kings unjustly broke, God, and the People, mighty vengeance took !* * Samuel told the people the manner of the kingdom, and tmote it in a book and laid it up be/ore the Lord. (1 Samuel, X. as.) It is plain, the word manner signifies the constitution of the government, or the conditions on which Saul was to be king, namely, according to justice and law ; and this is meant in frequent expressions, by going in and out before them, referring to justice being executed in the gates, and peace and war ; the king was to lead them in one, and direct in the other. This manner of the kingdom was told to all the people, and that implied, that the consent of the people was requisite to make him king, without which, though Samuel had anointed him, he was not owned by the Israelites, but went about his private aifairs till after the victory over the Ammonites. Then the manner of the kingdom was written in a book — a token of its being a compact between Saul and the people ; and Samuel's laying it up before the Lord, is equivalent to an oath recorded on both sides ; for it was there as a witness between the king and the people, and served both as their oath of allegiance, and bis oath of government. — All this being done, what followed? All the people went to Gilgal, and there they (mark the word) made SaiU king.—{l Samuel , i. 15.) '£,6 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS Then mark the needful steps to make him King, How sacred ends, concurring means must bring ; Not Samuel's ointment, not the mighty lot. Could make him King, nor force his title out. The people like not his mechanic race. They see no greatness in his youthful face : — " Is this the monarch shall our foes destroy. Does heaven design to rule us by a boy ?" The flouting Rabbies cry ! " We scorn to own, A man that has no merit for a crown. Our King must lead the glorious tribes to fight. And chase the thousands of the Ammonite ; His pers'nal valour must our triumphs bring, 'Tis such a man we want, and such a King." Away they go, reject his government. Not Heav'n's high choice could force their due consent ! Samuel submits, adjourns the strong debate. Suspends the King he offered to create ; Owns their dislike's a high material thing. That their Consent alone could make him King ! Why did not God displeasure then express. Resent the slight, and punish their excess ; Extort obedience by express command. And crown his choice by his immediate hand j Destroy the Rebels with his blasting breath. And punish early treason with their death; With mighty thunders his new King proclaim. And force the trembling tribes to do the same? Because He knew it was the course of things. And Nature's law, that men should choose their Kings ; TO GOVERN WRONG. 27 He knew the early dictate was his oivn. That reason acted from himself a\one.* " 'Tis just," says the Almighty Power, "and sense," (For actions are the xvords of Providence ; The mouth of consequences speaks aloud. And Nature's language is the voice of God :) " 'Tis just," says he, " the people should be shown. The man that wears it, can deserve the crown. Merit will make my choice appear so just. They'll own him fit for the intended trust ; Confirm by reason my exalted choice. And make him King by all the people's voice. Let Ammon's troops my people's tents invade. And Israel's trembling sons, to fear betray'd, * It is alledged, that tlie vulgar are not capable of judging concerning principles of government ; I answer, they are then not capable of being guilty of transgression ; for where tliere is a want of capacity of judgment, there can be no sin. This is a dangerous argument, my Lords, and exposes government to tlie violence of every one wlio can overturn it with impunity. You have no defence against any person in this case who is resolute, except superior strength ; for the gallows will not frighten a man who is not conscious of guilt, if he has any degree of natural fortitude. Try to persuade the vulgar that there is any case in which they cannot sin, and you will soon perceive what opera- tion it will have upon them. But when you tell them tlley are not judges of your manoeuvres of state, they will soon tell you that they cannot transgress what they do not understand: and that you require of them more than the Deity requires of them, or even supposes ; for he requires no duty without first allowing men to judge of his laws, and makes no laws beyond the reach of theii uiideistandin<^.s. Sermons to Asses, {Ministers qf State,) p. 57. 28 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS, &C. Fly from th' advancing legions in the fright. Till Jabesh' walls embrace the Ammonite ; I'll spirit Saul, and arm his soul for war. The boy they scorn, shall in the field appear; I'll teach the inexperienced youth to fight. And flesh him with the slaughter'd Ammonite. The general suffrage then he'll justly have To rule the people he knows how to save ; Their willing voices all the tribes will bring. And make my chosen hero be their King." He speaks, and all the high events obey. The mighty voice of Nature leads the way ; The troops of Ammon Israel's tents invade. His mighty fighting sons, to fear betray'd. Fly from th' advancing squadrons in the fright, 'TillJabesh' walls embrace the Ammonite. Saul rouzes ; God had arm'd his soul for war ; The boy they scorn'd does in the field appear ; His pers'nal merit now bespeaks the throne. He beats the enemy, and wears his crown. The willing tribes their purchased suffrage bring. Their universal voice proclaims him King. As if Heaven's call had been before in vain, Saul from this proper minute, dates his reign. The text is plain, and proper to the thing, "Not GOD — but all The People made him King ! End of Book I. THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS TO GOVERN WRONG. BOOK II. The King is ours T' administer, to guard, t' adorn the State, But not to warp or change it. Mark now the difference, ye that boast your love Of kings, between your Loyalty and ours. Our love is principle, and has its root In reason ; is judicious, manly, free : Yours, a blind instinct, crouches to the rod. And licks the foot, that treads it in the dust. The Duty of Resistance to Tyrants — Law — Ciistom — Packed Juries — The Custom of Kings to tyrannize — The Custom of the People to dethrone them instanced in James II. — Rehoboam — Royalty a trust. Were I permitted to inspect the rolls, Th' eternal archives, hid beyond the poles ; The cause of causes could 1 but survey. And see how consequences there obey : This should be first of all that I'd enquire. And this to know, the bounds of my desire — Why Justice reels beneath the blows of might. And Usurpation sets her foot on right ; Why fame bestows her ill-deserv'd applause. When outrage triumphs over nature's laws j E 30 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS Why htaveii permits the worst of men to rule. And binds the wise man to obey the fool ;* * It is difficalt to avoid laughing at the extreme ignorance of crowned heads themselves, in despotic countries, when one con- trasts it with the importance they assume, and the pomp and splendour with which they transfer their royal persons from place to place. The sight is truly ludicrous. Are these the men, occupied, as they usually are, in the meanest trifles and the most degrading pleasures, who tell us tiiat the government-over which they preside, is a perfect system, and that the wisest phi' losopher knows not how to govern mankind; that is, to consult their happiness and security, so well as themselves, neglected as they have been in youth, and corrupted in manhood by pan- ders to their vices, and Hatterers of their foibles, their pride, and their ambition ? Tiiere is reason to believe that many kings in despotic kingdoms, have been worse educated, and possess less abi- lities, than a common charity-boy, trained in a parish school to read and write. Spirit of Despotism. An Anecdote, containing the thoughts of a Despot is a treat. It appears from the Emperor of Austria heading the Holy Alliance against Naples with our money in his pockets, as well as from a letter dated Layl)ach, 28th January, 1821, that his Majesty has the horrors. The letter states, that when the Professors of the Lyceum at Laybach were presented to liim, he made this ?ieivous speech : — " Gentlemen — The students of Carniola have always deserved praise, (/mm which their jn'ogress in useful knowledge may be in- ferred). Endeavour to preserve for them this good character, (modern Boeotians). Remain ever faithful to what is ancient, (Tyranny) ; for what is ancient is good, (he means for himself) ; and our ancestors (his Ancestors) ever found it so. Why should it not be the same to us? (The throne-men). People (tyranl- haters) are occupied elsewhere (at Naples) with new notions (principles of liberty), that I (heigh Ok!) cannot approve, (can- not help) ; and never shall approve, (Royal till death). From auch notions (political truth ) preserve yourselves, (God pre- TO GOVERN WRONG. 31 Why its own thunder does not strike the crown, And from the stools of pow'r thrust Tyrants down ; Why it pursues the murd'rer's meaner crime, But leaves exalted criminals to time ? Kings spurn at limitations, laws, and rules. And rob mankind — because mankind are fools; Wheedled to act against their common sense. To jumble tyranny with providence ; serve the Emperor); attach yourselves to nothing but what is positive, (Despotism). I do not want learned men (the students at Coiienltagen on the king's birth-day, January 2nd, 1821, shouted " Vivat Kex ;" the soldiers, not understanding Loyalty in Latin, and, supposing the students uttered seditious cries, dispersed them with their sabres and killed four: ergo Steel is stronger than La- tin). I want only loyal and good subjects, (implicitly obedient slaves) ; and it is your part to (become drill Serjeants, and) form them (into line). He who serves (implicitly obeys), will in- struct, (that is — keep the students stupid) according to my orders ; and whoever feels himself incapable of that, (non-instruction,) and embraces novel ideas, (knowledge,) had better depart — or I shall myself remove him, (by putting something into his head !). This is a fine and perfect specimen of legitimate mind ; and here is another : — At the Museum of Bologna the Professors of the University shewed this same Emperor one of Sir Humphrey Davy's safety lamps, and informed him that the Englishman its inventor, had, by his numerous discoveries, produced a revo- lution in science. At the word revolution the countenance of the Emperor changed ; he rumped the attendant, and said, the King of England would no doubt feel the consequences of his conde- scension to his unruly subjects ; but, as to himself, he should take proper care not to suffer any of his subjects to make revo- lutions! — '^What is ancient is good." Stick to that, Despots! Your ancestors, 'an please your Majesties, groped without safety lamps —1 pray that you may, till you be no more. 32 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS To hope from God what God expects from them. For what they ought to do, look up to Him ; Leave unperform'd the duties which they know, And lift up hands they should employ below ! Christians must no more miracles expect. The men that will be slaves. He'll not protect ; God never will our base petitions hear. Till our endeavours supersede our prayer ; Not always then ; but nation's may be sure. The willing bondage ever shall endure. They that would have His power to be their friend. Must, with what power they have, their right defend.^ The laws of God, God makes us understand. The laws of Nature never countermand. Nature prescribes, for 'tis prescrib'd to sense. Her first of laws to man — is self-defence. This then is Law to man, from God on high. Resisting live — or unresisting die ! He always works by means, and means he'll bless. With approbation, often with success. Nor prayers nor tears will revolutions make. Tyrants pull down, or irksome bondage break ; 'Tis our own business ; and He lets us know. What is our business, he expects we'll do. Tyrants sometimes in Revolutions fall. Though their destruction's not design'd at all ; So hasty show'rs, when they from heav'n flow down. Are sent to fructify, and not to drown ; * God punishes bad kings and oppressors, as he does the rest of mankind — through liis instruments, Thf, People. It is the only way by which he has ever made an example of tyrants as a terror to others. TO GOVERN WRONG. 33 And, in the torrent, if a drunkard sink, 'Tis not the flood that drowns him, but the drink; Yet who would say, because a sinner's slain. For fear of drowning, we must have no rain. It's doubtful who live most unnatural lives. The subject that his liberty survives. Or kings that trample law and freedom down. And make free justice truckle to the crown. Law is the master-spring of government — The only Right Divine that heaven has sent,* •" The tyrant Henry VIII., by making himself the head of the Church, clearly begat the Right Divine. The King could give bishoprics, and the Bishops could give opinions. " Your ]Ma= jesty is the breath of our nostrils," said Bishop Neil to James I., and speaking of himself and brethren as to worldly advantages, he certainly spoke the truth. Before the Kings of England were heads of the Church we heard little of divine right, and some- times the Church itself was seen on the side of freedom ; since that time, never. The doctrine in England, that the King can do no wrong, supposes the positive responsibility of his Minis- ters. But, that it is a dangerous licence of language, is wit- nessed in a Right Reverend exposition of this kingly privi- lege in regard to Adultery. The Bishop leaped from political to moral delinquency, with a casuistry worthy an admirer of the royal power of translation. The Abbe de Choisy, a Priest of the same school as the British Father in God, though not of the same church, dedicated an edition of Thomas a Kempis, on the ' Imitation of Chrisf to Madame de Mainteuon, a courtesan and mistress to Louis XIV,, prefixing this motto : " Hear oh ! daugh- ter, and consider, and incline thine ear ; forget also thine own people, and thy father's house ; so shall the King greatly desire thyi beauty .'"Psa.slv. 10, n. The Court's a golden but a fatal circle, Upon whose magic skirts a thousand devils 34 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS It forms the order of the world below. And all our blessings from that order flow. Law is the life-blood of the social state ; Subordinate to law is magistrate ; To set the magistrate above the law. Would all to error and confusion draw. He's not a king that's not prescribed by laws — King's, the effect, but government's the cause. Of all authority for Right Divine, Custom's the worst, for every royal line. The still-born Ignorance of antiquity, Quirk'd into life to cozen freemen by. Lawyers call Custom ; and, for custom, draw On custom still, to still call custom, Law ! So ' rules' the Bench, and so the maxim takes. The fault one age commits, no age forsakes ! Begot by fools, maintain'd by knaves and fools. Improved by craft in error's public schools ; With shifting face, with loose and stammering tongue. The juggling fraud has plagued the world too long ; Modern encroachments on our freedom makes. And backs it with our fathers' old mistakes : As if our rev'rence, to their virtues due. Should recommend their crimes and follies too 1 This vapour Custom, this mere wand'ring cloud Puffs the crown'd wretch, and helps to make him proud. Persuades him to believe it must be true. Homage to Law, becomes the Tyrant's due ! In crystal forms, sit tempting innocence, And beckon early virtue from its centre. Anon, quoted by Dr. Watts. TO GOVERN WRONG. 35 Thus Priestcraft preaches, and thus Lawyers draw An after age, to call a custom — Law ! And yet this boasted, ever-quoted thing. Fails in the point — fails to support the king : For though by custom, kings have learn'd to ride A few vile minions, to support their pride. The people always have opposed the cheat. It never was iheir custom to submit ; The Practice of the people made the name. For practices and customs are the same ; And custom this one mighty truth will tell. When kings grow tyrants, nations will rebel. The people may, for custom gives assent. Dethrone the man, to save the Government ! If any say the practice is not so. Let them to England for examples go. England the Right Divine of kings profess'd* And all the marks of slavery caress'd ; Long courted chains, but 'twas in court disguise. And holy fraud conceal'd the sacred lies — The Church the mountebank, the King the jest. The ivheedled monarch, and the wheedling priest ! James proved the patient, crouching, loyal tribe. But let h.\^fate their loyalty describe ! * Sir Robert Filiner, the great chanipioa of Divine Right having defended it in print, Algernon Sidnej' drew out a system of original power, and government according to the laws of God, nature, and reason. Before it was finished, the friends of Divine Right seized the manuscript, and finding Sidney's arguments un- answerable, they laid aside the work, and fell upon the man ; — so they cut oft' his head, merely because they could not an- swer his book. 36 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS With life-and-fortune, churchmen back'd the crown/ In crushing all men's freedom but their own. Then, under colour or pretence of law. Villains their victims to the shambles draw. Where sat the scoundrel Chief in ermined pride. And a pack'd jury in the box beside. The farce commences — justice heaves a groan — The case is clear — a verdict for the Crown ! When noble Russell and brave Sidney fell. Judges themselves rung out Law's funeral knell ! * A Courtier's loyalty is charmingly pictured in tlie portrait of Bubb Doddingtou, drawn by hiraself in his celebrated Diary. He was by trade a Borougbmonger, and his stock consisted of six Members in the House of Commons, which he jobbed about and sold to the best bidder. At the close of liis bargain and sale of the whole in a hnnp to the Duke of Newcastle for tiie king's ser- rice, there is afinish which renders the painting a fine and match- less Cabinet specimen. — Bubb, who had been in disgrace at court for selling them elsewhere, said to tlie duke, " I knew I had given nojus< cause ofoffence, but that I could not justify it withHis Majesty; that it was enough that He (the king) was dis- pleased, to make tne think that / was in the wrong, and to beg Him to forget it : I would not even be in the right against HIM !" The duke was delighted with this loyal and dutiful sub- mission. Bubb says, " He took mc up in his arms, and kissed me twice !" and Bubb was rewarded for laying his six members of the honorable house at the foot of the throne with the price he stipulated for— namely, the treasurership of the navy, and a peer- age ! The story was beautifully and most impressively related by the excellent-hearted and inflexible John Hunt, in his noble and succestful defence, on the trial of an ex officio information for words in the Examiner charged not as false, but as libellous on the Honorable House. TO GOVERN WKONG. 37 Yet when their oivn destruction they foresaw, The passive knaves cried Liberty and Laio ! Took from their best of Kings his Right Divine, And abrogated fealty to the Hne ; They made a precedent, dropp'd T from Treason, And found the best of ivords behind it — reason ! The crown's a symbol, that the people meant. To mark their choice, or form of government ;* The crown is theirs, and this has been their plan, To make the office sacred, not the 7nan : Hence, if a tyrant on the throne appears. The place is vacant, and the crown is theirs. David, the patient tribes too much opprest, Vex'd them with tribute, and deny'd them rest ; Harass'd the land with imposts and alarms. Taxing and fighting — money ! and to arms ! His son, however wise, disturbed their peace, With taxes for his sumptuous palaces ; * All Majesty is derived from Law founded on right reason. A strength beyond tliat is mere force. The Magistrate formerly had no Majesty but while engaged in magisterial duties. His real dignity consisting in his legal authority. When the ancient parliaments of France met according to the constitution annually, the king went to meet the members seated in a waggon drawn by oxen, which a waggoner drove with his goad to the parliament house ; but he was in no state until he was seated there, robed and crowned, and sceptred. And, in- deed, in that place only, where the great affairs of the Com- monwealth are transacted, can it be said, that Real Majesty does truly and properly reside ; and not where the king plays, or dances, or prattles with his women, when the vulgar are always styling him, your Majesty. Hotoman's Franeo-gallia, p. 73. 38 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS His love of women and his garish state. His love of pomp and show, and looking great ; His building projects, and his vast designs. Too vast for all the gold of Ophir's mines. The people's hearts dismay'd, their feelings pain'd. Their love unsettled, and their treasures drain'd.* By two such vig'rous monarchs long opprest. The next that came they loyally addrest ; Implored his gracious majesty would please To tax them less, and let them live in peace. The son of Solomon with anger hears The people dare to offer him their pray'rs. Spurns their Address, his rage no bounds restrain, And thus he gives his answer with disdain : — " I bear from Heaven the ensigns of my sway. My business is to rule, and your's obey : Therefore your scandalous Address withdraw, 'Tis my command, and my command's your law : Sedition grows from seeds of discontent, Ax\A faction always snarls at government : But since my throne from God alone I hold. To Him alone my councils I unfold ; My resolutions he has made your laws. You are to know my actions. He the cause ! • Solomon could have but two occasions for money ; one for his costly b^liding^>, tiie other for his numerous women, for he uever had any wars. To the expense of his buildings the kings of other countries contributed largely ; so that it must have been his excesses in women, and other luxurious indul- gences, that caused Lim to oppress the people with heavy bur- dens of taxes. TO GOVERN WRONG. 39 Wherefore I stoop, to let you understand, I double all the taxes of the land. And if your discontents and feuds remain. Petition — and I'll double them again ! The mild correction which my Father gave. Has spoil'd the people he design'd to save ; You murmur'd then, but had you thus been used. You'd ne'er his easy clemency abused !" The injured people, treated with disdain. Found their Petitions and Addresses vain ! Long had they made submissions to the crown. And long the love of Liberty had known ; The kings they ask'd of God had let them see. What God himself foretold of tyranny. The father had exhausted all their stores. With costly houses, and more costly whores ; But doubly robb'd by his encroaching son. They rather chose to die, than be undone ; And, thus resolving, by a single stroke. Ten tribes revolted, and their bondage broke 1 The tyrant, in his sceptred bloated pride. Believing God and blood upon his side ; To the high altar in a rage repairs, And rather tells his tale, than makes his prayers :* . " Behold !" says he, " the slaves, o'er whom I reign. Have made the pow'r I had from Thee in vain ; From thy diviner rule they separate. And make large schisms both in Church and State ; My just intentions are, with all my force. To check rebellion in its earliest course ; * The author has taken a poetical licence here. For scripture docs not'i/ay that Reboboam prayed to the Lord. 40 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS Revenge th' affronts of my insulted throne. And save thy injured honour, and my own ; And as thy counsels did my fathers bless. He claims thy help, who does their crown possess!" Listen ye kings, ye people all rejoice. And hear the answer of th' Almighty voice : Tremble, ye tyrants, read the high commands. In sacred writ the sacred sentence stands ! " Stir not afoot ! thy new-rais'd troops disband !" Says THE Eternal; — " it is my command ! I raised thy fathers to the Hebrew throne, I set it up, but you yourselves pull down ! For when to them I Israel's sceptre gave, 'Twas not my chosen people to enslave. My first command no such commission brings, / jnade no tyrants, though / made you kings; But you my people vilely have opprest. And misapplied the powers which you possest. 'Tis Nature's laws the people now direct. When Nature speaks, I never contradict. Draw not the sword, thy brethren to destroy. The liberty they have, they may enjoy ; I ever purposed, and I yet intend. That what they may enjoy, they may defend ; They have deserted from a misused throne, " The things from Me" — the crime is all thy own !"* * When the ten tribes revolted from Rehoboam, and chose Je- roboam king, there is no doubt they limited him by law ; for many years afterwards king Ahab, one of liis successors, admiring a herb-garden near to his own palace, applied to the owner, Na- both, and offered him either a vineyard for it, or the worth of it in money; but Naboth would neither exchange nor t\\ it, and TO GOVERN WRONG. 41 If kings no more be flatter'd and deceived. Nor shun too late, the knaves they have beheved; If as ' trustees for uses' they agree To act by Hmited authority ; Subordination will its order keep. Ambition die, and all rebellion sleep. The weeping nations shall begin to laugh. The subjects easy, and the rulers safe. Plenty and peace embrace just government. The king be pleased, the people be content. If any king is hoodwink'd to believe. People will blind obedience to him give ; Let him pause long, before he dares to try. They all by practice give their words the lie !* Abab returned home so vexed, that he went to bed and would not eat any thing. Naboth having thus displeased the king, the courtiers got up a charge of Blasphemy and Sedition against him by means of false witnesses hired on purpose ; he was found guilty and executed, and Ahab got possession of the garden, pro- bably as a forfeiture to the crown. It is clear, therefore, that Abab's power was restrained by law, for it was not until Nabot was murdered under the forms of law, that the king could get the poor man's property. Another thing is very remarkable : as soon as the murder was completed, and the king had got the garden, there was an honest Father in God, who, instead of say- ing ' the king could do no wrong,' went to his majesty, charged him with the crime, and denounced his downfall, which happen- ed accordingly, through his listening to flattering ecclesiastics, and his fondness for military affairs. If the Bishop of London should desire to preach on this story, he is informed that he may find it in the Bible, 1 Kings, xxi. * Flattery is a fine picklock of tender ears ; especially of those whom fortun hath home high upon their wings, that submit 42 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS, &C. Art may by mighty dams keep out the tide, Check the strong current, and its streams divide; Pen up the rising waters, and deny The easy waves to glide in silence by : But if the river is restrain'd too long. It swells in silence to resent the wrong ; With fearful force breaks opposition down. And claims its native freedom for its own. So Tyranny may govern for a time. Till Nature drowns the tyrants with their crime ! their dignity and authority to it, by a soothing of themselves. For, indeed, men could never be taken in that abundance with the springes of others' flattery, if they be^an not there ; if they did but remember how much more protitable the bitterness of truth were than all the honey distilling from a whorish voice, which is not praise but poison. But now it is come to that extreme of folly, or rather madness, with some, that he that flatters them mO' destltj, or sparingly, is thought to malign them. Ben Jimson. Ttie ears of kings are so tingled with a continual uniform ap- probation, that they have scarce any knowledge of true praise. Have they to do with the greatest fool of all their subjects — they have no way to take advantage of him : by the flatterer saying, " It is because he is my king," he thinks he has said enough to imply that he therefore suffered himself to be over- come. This quality stifles and confuses the other trae and es- sential qualities which are sunk deep in the kingship. Montaigne. End of Book II. THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS TO GOVERN WRONG. BOOK III. Nations would do well T' extort their tninclieons from the puny hands Of Heroes, whose infirm and baby minds Are gratified with mischief; and who spoil. Because men suffer it, their Toy — The World, Tyrants deposed to preserve the Throne — In Europe — In England before the Conquest — By each other since. — No right line any tohere — Difference between Tyrants and Kings — Government instituted by the People for their oxvn good — Tyrants treat men as cattle to be slaughtered — God decrees their fall — Ordains Revolutions by the People. OEARCH we the long records of ages past. Look back as far as antient rolls will last ; Beyond what oldest history relates. While kings had people, people magistrates ; Nations, e'er since there has been king or crown. Have pull'd down tyrants to preserve the throne. The laws of nature then, as still they do. Taught them, their rights and safety to pursue ; That if a king, who should protect, destroys. He forfeits all the sanction he enjoys. 44 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS There's not a nation ever own'd a crown. But if their kings opprest them, puU'd them down ; Concurring Providence has been content. And always blest the action in th' event. He that, invested with the robes of power. Thinks 'tis his right the people to devour. Will always find some stubborn men remain. That have so little wit, they won't be slain ; Who always turn again when they're opprest. And basely spoil the gay tyrannic jest ; Tell kings — o( Nature, Laivs of God, and Right, Take up their arms, and with their tyrants fight. When passive thousands fall beneath the sword. And freely die at the imperial word, A stern, unyielding, self-defending few. While they resist, will ravel all the clew ; Will all the engines of oppression awe. And trample pow'r beneath the feet of law. 'Tis always natural for men opprest. Whene'er occasion offers to resist ; They're traitors else to truth and common sense. And rebels to the laws of Providence ; 'Tis not enough to say, they may — they 7nust; The strong necessity declares it just;* 'Tis Heav'n's supreme command to man, and they Are always blest who that command obey. * If it be asked, Who shall be judge ? it is plaia that God has made Nature judge. If a king make a law, destructive of human society and the general good, may it not be resisted and opposed? " No !" exclaim a junta of holy men, " it is from GOD!" What is Blasphemy '{ TO GOVERN WRONG. 45 . So France deposed the Merovingian line. And banish'd Childrick * lost the right divine ; So Holy League their sacred Henry f slew. And caird a counsel to erect a new ; For right divine must still to justice bow. And people first the right to rule bestow : So Spain to arbitrary kings inured. Yet arbitrary Favilat abjured ; Denmark four kings deposed, and Poland seven, Swedeland but one-and-twenty, Spain eleven : Kussia, Demetrius banish'd from the throne,§ And Portugal puU'd young Alphonsus down ; * CLilderic I. the son of Meiovius, for his lasciviousness, was banished by the great men, and one Egidius, a Gaul, set up in bis stead. Childeiic II. was banished and deposed by his sub- jects, and king Pepin reigned iu his stead ; and so ended the Merovingian family. t The League deposed Henry III. and declared him a tyrant, a murderer, and incapable to reign, and held frequent counsels with the pope's legate and the Spaniards about settling the crown, and several proposals were made of settling it, sometimes on the infanta of Spain, at other times on the cardinal of Bourbon, the duke Flows the best title of the Best of Kings J* ' * The Best of Kings (Court slang) the King for the time being. — Many a king lias been the worst man of his ege, but uo king was ever the best. In 1683, the very year of Cliarles the Second's reign, in which Lord WiUiani Russel and Algernon Sydney were murdered nnder the forms of law, by packed juries, and the king's passive obedient judges — when the throne floated in blood, and the king's manners were notoriously and disgust- ingly sensual and dissolute — in that year, J. Shurley, M. A. in his ' Ecclesiastical History Epitomised,' gives Charles the title of " the best of kings .'" calls his life and reign virtuous! and prays that his days may be as the days of Heaven! — This loyal author calls himself, The Christian reader's " beloved Brother in Christ! ' Of the same king, Charles II., Horace Walpole (Lord Orford) gives this character in his Epistle from Florence : — (^Dodsley's Collection, vol. ill. p. 92.) Fortune, or fair, or frowning, on his soul Could stamp no virtue, and no vice controul! Honour or morals, gratitude or truth, Nor taught his ripen'd age, nor knew his youth ! The care of nations left to whores or chance, Plund'rer of Britain, pensioner of France; Free to buffoons, to ministers denied, He lived an atheist, and a bigot died! AH kings have parasites and praise ; the Press records their actions; and Posterity gives tlieir characters. 56 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS Right of Succession, or what other claim Of right to rule, by whatsoever name Or title call'd, by whomsoever urged. Is in the people's right qf choosing merged. The right's the People's, and the People's choice Binds kings in duty to obey their voice ; The Public Will, the only Right Divine, Sanctions the office, or divides the line ; Topples the crown from off the tyrant's, head. And puts a king to govern in his stead. Tyrant and king are vastly different things — We're robb'd by tyrants, but obey'd by kings ! If it be ask'd, how the distinction's known. Oppression marks him out — the nations groan. The broken laws, the cries of injur'd blood. Are languages by all men understood !* • Tyrants lose all respect for humanity, in proportion as they are sunk beneath it; taught to believe themselves of a different spe- cies, they really become so; lose their participation with their kind; and, in mimicking the God, dwindle into the brute! Blind with prejudices as a mole, stung with truth as with scorpions, sore all over with wounded pride like a boil, their minds a heap of morbid proud flesh and bloated humours, a disease and gan- greue in the state, instead of its life-blood and vital principle — foreign despots claim mankind as their property. Tliey regard men crawling oil the face of the earth as we do insects that cross our path, and survey the common drama of human life as a fan- toccini exhibition got up for their anmsement. It is the over- weening, aggravated, intolerable sense of swelling pride and un- governable self-will that so often drives them mad ; as it is their blind fatuity and insensibility to all beyond themselves, that, transmitted through successive generations, and confirmed by regal intermarriages, in time makes them idiots. HazUtt's Political Essays, p. 341. TO GOVERN WRONG. 57 Just laws and liberty make patriot kings ; Tyrants and tyranny are self-made things.* * Though a Despot be transformed into a limited king, he is in heart and purpose still a despot. He feels duress ; he is not at liberty to oppress at his pleasure ; and he awaits an opportunity to exercise ' the Right Divine of Kings to govern wrong;' for lie holds the doctrine that " oaths are not to be kept with subjects." In the reign of Richard II. the Duke of Norfolk apprised tlie Duke of Hereford, that the King purposed their destruction : — Hereford. — God forbid !— He has sworn by St. Edward, to be a good Lord to me and the others. Norfolk.—So has he often sworn to me by God's Body : but I do not trust him the more for that .' Every restored despot has become an unblushing and shame- less perjurer ; where is there in history an instance to the con- trary ? — Once a Despot, and always a Despot. Alfred the Great is the only King in our annals who being guilty of misgovernment, and seeing its evils had the high courage to acknowledge his crime by amendment. At the commence- ment of his reign he seemed to consider his exalted dignity as an emancipation from restraint, and to have found leisure, even amidst his struggles with the Danes, to indulge the impetuosity of his passions. His immorality and despotism provoked the censure of the virtuous; lie was haughty to his subjects, neglected the ad- ministration of justice, and treated with contempt the complaints of the indigent and oppressed. In the eighth year of his reign he was driven from the throne by the Danes. Narrowly escaping death and enduring many hardships, adversity brought refloc- tion. According to the piety of the age, instead of tracin^^ events to their political sources, he referred them immediately to the providence of God ; and considered his misfortunes as the instrument with which Divine Justice punished his past enormi- ties. By his prudence and valour he regained the throne, and drew up a code of laws by which he ordained the government should be administered. Magistrates trembled at his stern im- partiality and inflexibility. He executed forty-four judges in I r 60 THE RIGHT DIVINE OF KINGS, &r. No ! He has issued no such foul command, But dooms down Despots by the People's hand ; Marks tyrants out for fall in every age. Directs the justice of the people's rage; And hurling vengeance on all royal crimes. Ordains the Revolutions of the times! A thing of no bowels- froni the crown to tlie toe, topfull Of direst cruelty. — His Realm a slaughter-house — The swortls of soldiers are his teeih Iron for Naples, hid with English gilt. SUAKSPEARC. The End. Printed by W.IIone, Ludgate Hill, London. ^IXHTI^ GENERAL UlSTKESS iJNUKbASJiU. See next Page. Specimi'ii of a Bank "Sole _ uot to he imitated ^,ihmktf,(to t/u- Cvn.suhmtion .•/ t/uBunknimtxr.s run/t/u- insr^uhimr/ ^''^l^'^''''^ V; THE BANK RESTRICTION BAROMETER; OR, SCALE OF EFFECTS ON SOCIETY OF THE 25anfi Bote .f^y.^tcm, anD JDajimcnt!;? in siDolD. BY ABRAHAM FRANKLIN. »,* To be read from the words «' BANK RESTRICTION," in the middle, upwards or downwards. 31 30 NATIONAL PROSPERITY PROMOTED. 10. The Number of useless Public Executions dinii- nislied. 9. The Auielioiatioii of the Ciimiual Code facilitated. 8. The Forgery of Bank Notes at an end. 7. Manufacturers and Journeyiiien obtain Necessaiies and Comforts for their Wages. 6. The Means of Persons with small Incomes enlarged. 5. A Fall of Rents and Prices. 4. The Circulating Medium diminished. 3. Fictitious Capital and False Credit destroyed. 2. Exchanges equalized, and the Gold Coin preserved, if allowed to be freely exported. 1. The Gold Currency restored. Consequences, if taken off, will be as above: — viz. THE BANK RESTRICTION. Consequences of its Operation are asfollws: — iiz. 1. Disappearance of the legal Gold Coin. 2. The Issues of Bank of England Notes «iid Country Bank Notes extendeil. 3. Paper Accommodation, creating False Credit, Ficti- tious Capital, Mischievous Speculation. 4. The Circulatins? Medium enormously enlarged. 6. Rents and Prices of Articles of the first Necessity, doubled and trebled. 6. The Income and Wages of small Annuitants, and Arti- sans and Labourers, insufficient to purchase Necessa- ries for their Support. 7. Industry reduced to Indigence, broken-spirited, and ia the Workhouse ; or, endcavourmg to preserve inde- pendence, lingering in despair, conimiiting suicide, or dying broken-hearted. 8. The Temptation to forge Bank of England Notes in- creased and tacditated. 9. New and sanguinary Laws against Forgery ineffectually enacted. 10. Frequent and useless infiictions of the barbarous Pu- nishment of Death. GENERAL DISTRESS INCREASED. See next Page, At the foot of tlie original Edition of the ** Bank Restriction Barometer," which was printed on a large open half sheet, to fold as an envelope of the " Bank Note not to be imitated," were added the following NOTE. In the Debate in the House of Lords, on the first day of the meeting of Parliament (•21st Jan. 1819), Lord Liverpool said, " About the Bank Prosecutions for the Forgery of their Notes, he had only to observe, that a Committee had been appointed, on the order of the other House ; and that this Committee had prepared a Report, stat- ing that Plans had been presented, by which, if Forgery could not he rendered impossible, it could at least he rendered extremely difficult.' QUERY. By what Interest has the temptation to commit Forgery been encouraged ? and to what Interest have wretched beings been sacrificed for twenty years, when their crime might have been rendered " difficult if not impossible /" 3Buonapavtep]^ol)ia. THE ORIGIN OF DR. SLOPS NAME. " I have conferred on him a glorious Immortality !" * * * * " With his name the mothers still their babes !" K. Henry VI. •* David's portrait of NAPOLEON, AS HE NOW APPEARS; See Page 6, Note. Ji^mti) enitton. LONDON: PRINTED BY AND FOR WILLIAM HONE, 45, LUDGATE HILL. 1820. PREFACE. In my Dedication of the ' Political House that Jack Built,' to DOCTOR SLOP and his sapi- ent admirers, I have stated, that he is indebted to me for his name. This is true. The little piece, in which 1 conferred upon him that enviable and last- ing distinction, is entitled " Buonaparte-phobia, or Cursing onade Easy to the meanest Capacity.'' I wrote and published it, on an open sheet, in the summer of 1815, to expose the impious and pro- fane curses he then lavished, in T^ke T fines' Jour- nal, upon Buonaparte, on hi x^ty,YX\ from Elba. The exposure was so effectual ' t •ihe Doctor was, in a few days, dismissed from that paper. To cover his disgrace, he openly and unblushingly lied, and attempted to nefariously delude, and otherwise practise gross impostures upon the Public. In answer to his fabrications, and, as a caution to the unwary, the chief Proprietor of The Times was compelled to state the grounds upon which he was discharged, " He knows full well," says T'he Times, in February, 1817, "that his articles were rejected from our columns, on account of the vi- rulence and indiscretion with which they were written ; and that, for more than the twelve months preceding, whatever articles attracted notice by their merit, were exclusively the productions of other gentlemen. — There are, in the Office, sacks full of his rejected writings ; which, if they were IV PREFACE. published, would exhibit an accurate criterion of his puffed off abilities : the sale of our Journal in- creased the more, the less he wrote ; and, since he has ceased from writing altogether, has ex- tended with a rapidity, of which we have known no example, since we have had the management of it." The Times concludes its observations upon the reputation the Doctor assumed to himself, from having been allowed to rave in its columns, with this remark : — " The braying of the Ass will sometimes make the forest ring as loudly as the roaring of the Lion. When the person of whom we are speaking, wrote in this Journal, he brayed in the Lious skin ; since he has written out of it, he will find that he has been braying in his own." Shortly after this castigation, the Doctor's public prostitution was notorious. He is now taken into high-keeping by an old lady at the Treasury. Perhaps this brief Notice may be satisfactory to the reader, preparatory to his curiosity being gra- tified with the Jeu d Esprit already mentioned, as ' the Origin of Doctor Slop's name.' It is my intention to reprint it in this lasting shape, from time to time, and so long as the Doctor daily empties his night-slush from his Slop-pail. By virtue of my public authority, I hereby ratify and confirm his right and title to the name of " SLOP ;" and, it is my parodial will and pleasure, that he continue to bear it during his natural life. 45, hudgate Hill, 21th Nov. 1820. THE ORIGIN, 4-c. BUONAPARTEPHOBIA, OR CURSING MADE EASY TO THE MEANEST CAPACITY, A Dialogue between the [late] Editor o/'" The Times,'' Dr. slop, My Uncle Toby, and My Fa- ther; embracing the Doctors VOCABULARY of Easy EPITHETS, and choice CURSES, against BUONAPARTE— after his leaving Elba ; shewing HO W TO NICKNAME AND CURSE NAPOLEON, to the best advantage, upon all occasions; being the approved terms re- gularly served up for some time past, in many re- spectable Families, with the Breakfast apparatus ; designed for the use of men, ivomen, and children, of all Ranks atid Cojiditions, throughout the Do- minions of England and Wales, and the Town of Berwick upon Tweed. Scene — a Room at Doctor SlopV in Doctors Commons. Present — Doctor Slop, My Father, and My Uncle Toby. A SINGLE loud tap of a knuckle against the outside of the lower panel of the parlour door, gave note of an humble earnest applicant for admission : — * Come B 6 ill,' said Doctor Slop, in a tone of elevated con- descension. The door opened, and a Printer's Devil en- tered. With an air of eagerness, bespeaking also a con- sciousness of his being a messenger of importance, the Devil walked up to Doctor Slop, and placing his body in an angle of fifty-five degrees, and his hand in his bosom at the same time, he drew forth, from between his waistcoat and shirt, and delivered to Doctor Slop, a small white paper parcel, directed and folded letterwise, and closed with paste instead of a wafer. * The proof of my leading article for to morrow's Times^ said Doctor Slop, with complacency, bowing towards my Father and my Uncle Toby in an apolo- gizing posture for breaking the envelope. My Father and my Uncle Toby bowed in return. The Devil watched Doctor Slop with a subdued curiosity, bordering upon alarm, as the Doctor un- folded and glanced upon the wet slips. A para- graph, that stood inmiediately above Slop's leader^ announced the appearance in London of David's Portrait of NAPOLEON, as he now appears.* ' D — n the infernal Scoundrel to everlasting per- dition,' loudly exclaimed Doctor Slop The Devil instantly left the room. Doctor Slop vociferated : — ' No sooner is a piece *■ The Portrait on the title-page of this Edition was printed on the former open-sheet Editions immediately under the above words. It is engraved from a Painting of Napoleon, by the celebrated David, and is a striking Likeness of him as he appeared just after his return from Elba. The Print was corrected from the original Portrait when it was brought over to this country, for a short time, just after the battle of Waterloo. of successful villainy achieved by this Monster, than our print-shops exhibit the iron countenanctt of NAPOLEON THE GREAT!— the portrait of that execrable Villain ! that hypocritical Vil- lain! that hare-faced Villain! that dariiig Villain! thsit pejjured Villain ! — that Disgrace of the Human Species ! — the Corsican ! the low-minded Corsican ! the wily Corsican ! the vile Corsican ! the onceinso- /e»^ Corsican ! the beaten, disgraced, and perjured Corsican ! the faithless, perjured, craft-loving Cor- sican ! a Fugitive ! — an Adventurer I — a Mustering Charlatan ! — such a Fellow ! — a Scoimdrel, with a degraded character! — an Impostor/ a despicable Impostor! a notorious Impostor! an hypocritical Impostor! — a Wretch! a desperate Wretch! such a Wretch ! — a Robber! — a mere JBrigand! an atro- cious Brigand ! — a savage Adversary ! — a Remorse- less Ruffian / — a Criminal! such a Criminal ! so in- famous a Criminal ! — that Traitor ! that Corsican Traitor ! that audacious Traitor ! that cowardly and perfidious Traitor ! i\\dit perjured Traitor ! that Arch Traitor ! — a Rebel ! an audacious Rebel ! a vile Corsican Rebel ! an usurping Rebel ! a proscribed Rebel ! an infamous Rebel ! the Arch Rebel ! the Rebel ivho defies all Europe ! — the Usurper ! the Comca/i Usurper! the w?i/i7ar^ Usurper! the bloody and perjured Usurper of the French throne! — the Rebel Chief! — the Rebel Tyrant! the degraded Tyrant ! — the consummate Despot; — V Empereur de la Canaille ! — the common Enemy of Europe ! — this neiv Catiline! — the prodigal son from the husks and draff oi the Isle of Elba! — this Robber is called in by his Brother Thieves ! — his crew ! his per- jured cvew\ he issues bloody orders to Rebels like 8 * himself, and calls them laws! — he! — the Ring-leader * of the conspiracy ! of the perjured bloody set !— ' In THE NEW CONSTITUTION we have lost ' the first consul and his two colleagues, st2ick like ^gizzard and liver — under his wings! — He is the ' most perjidious Wrelck that ever existed on the ' face of the earth ! a Wretch stained with every * crime I — tlie bloodiest and most perfidious Tyrant * that ever disgraced history! the impure Sink of all * the Vices ! — He instigated an attempt to carry off * from Schoenbrunn the child whom he impudently ' terms King of Rome — the child born of the * adidterous connection between himself and the * Archduchess Maria Louisa! — When at Elba, his * Sister Paulina served him for a Mistress ! ! ! — An * Outlaw from the common pale of civilized society ! — '- * a stigtnatized Traitor and Rebel in the eyes of all * France ! — England should take the lead in " Sounding the horn to kings who chase the Beast." * This Monster in human shape, on his blood-stained *■ throne ! this abhorred Monster ! this accursed Mons- * ter! — this Viper! this Viper of Corsica! this As- ' sassin of Ajaccio ! this notorious Hypocrite and * Liar, with the heart of a Demon, permits no English * newspaper but the MORNING CHRONICLE * to find its way into Paris ! ! ! * He is a Felon and an Outlaw ! — an Oath-breaker ! ' — a Perjurer ! — an arch Incendiary ! — What secu- * rity can this Wretch offer us that he will keep the * peace ! — he ! a man as infamoiis as if his ears had ' been nailed to the pillory ! — an Outlaw ! — a Mur- * derer ! a midnight Murderer ! — an Assassin ! — a * living Moloch ! — He has the audacity to proclaim 9 an amnesty ! — he ! — a Felon with a rope round his neck ! — The Criminal must either abdicate again, or be destroyed ! — He can't last long— he'll die without killing —he is so fat that he is obliged to be lifted on horseback by four Grenadiers, and four Grenadiers are obliged to lift him off again ! — and — as my friend of the Morning Post says, " the " dangerous complaints" with which he is afflicted " (a double rupture and a fistula), has* put a stop " to liis riding," and he refuses to be cured! — It is horrible to contemplate his lije, but his death, what human being but must rejoice at it ! — to destroy his power and person would be on the part of the peo- ple of E7igland most necessary and just ! — now is the time when " his giant's robe hangs loose about " him, as about a Dwarfish Thief T — There is not a street in London, in which at least ten individuals would not joyfully pay their hundred pounds each, to see this Monster hanged!— T'Ae COMMON HALL tvoidd ivash the blackamoor white ! — for this we have to expect the gratitude of the Felon ! — France, we are told, has made pacific overtures. — She! — Now who is this modest virtuous dame? Why truly her name is LEGION !t She is a set of the greatest miscreants on theface of the earth ! —Jf the DUKE OF BRUNSWICK'S MANL FESTO had been firmly acted upon by the Allies 22 years earlier, MOST HAPPY WOULD SUCH AN EVENT HAVE BEEN! J * Morning Post, Wednesday, 3d May, 1815. t Signifying " many devils" Luke, c. iii. v. 30. X The Duke of Brunswick's Manifesto threatened no quarter, and to carry fire and sword through France, if it resisted the attempts of the combined armies to re-estabhsh Louis XVI. France rose as one man, and defeated that ' Holy Alliance.' 40 Let us wait, it is said, till we are attacked ; but would any man act thus, if he saw a mad dog or a wild hea.st sprmvling as Buonaparte now is before him! — this Tiger! — this Hyena! — this Fiend! — this Bloody Dog ! — ' My uncle Toby and my Father had hitherto sat silent, at first looking in astonishment at Doctor Slop, then at each other, and then at Doctor Slop again ; when, supposing that Doctor Slop had con- cluded — a false conclusion, by the bye, for Doctor Slop had merely taken advantage of a triumphantly toned climax, and temporary want of breath, to make the least possible pause until he could proceed anew — my Uncle Toby said, ' Doctor Slop, when * you are sufficiently cool ' Cool !' cried Doctor Slop — ' Have I ever been ' cooler in my life, when 1 have read or heard of the ' Ruffian?'' ' I thought,' answered my Uncle Toby, ' that * there was a time when you^ Dr. S , used very * different language concerning revolutionary princi- ^ pies and revolutionary men? '* «!?_/?_ J ?_When? Where? Pho!— Pish!— * Psha!'— cried Doctor Slop, 'What if I did!— * What if I did!— What then ? But no matter for that, * — No matter for that, Sir, I say! — No matter. Sir! < —What is that to the readers of " The Times ?" * What is it to any body ? Buonaparte's a Wretch f a * My uncle Toby was right — hence the Doctor's testy evasiveness. Some years ago Dr. S was of the Vindicm Gallica School — as be calls it ; and seenaed to respect public virtue, and have a decent horror of court favour : now he abuses Sir James Mackintosh, and, whilst drinking deep of the Comte de Lille's Nectar d'Or, discovers " the true odour of sanctity" in the Lys, and — wonders how he could ever have done otherwise. * Villain! a Fool! an imperial Robber ! an infamous, * bloody, execrable, audacious, atrocious, ferocious — ' ' Let me entreat you to be cool,' said my Uncle Toby, interrupting Dr. S ' I beg your pardon for * hinting at youv former opinions — Don't be so ruf- * fled ! pray be cool ! ' * Cool !' cried Doctor Slop — ' I am as cool as I * have been these two months ! I have not spoken a * word which you will not find in ' The Times,'* * since the tiger broke his chain, and escaped from * his den. He is neither to be thought nor written of ' with patience — he is * * But pray,' interrupted my Uncle Toby — * Have * you authority to justify the use * Heaven grant me patience,' cried Doctor Slop — * Read "The Times"— read "The Times"— pray ' read " The Times :" there you will find authority * for every thing, and every thing for authority — for * legitimate authority — but as for the people, as they ' are called — the pretended sovereignty ' * Surely,' interrupted my Uncle Toby — ' there are * other papers. Doctor Slop, besides " The Times" ' that ' 'None! None!' exclaimed Doctor Slop — * not ' one, except " The Courier." St — t is a capital ' hand at a /eaervSons in public offices, and by others who desire to derive advantages from its efl'ects on the Constitution. Sent, carriage free, to Gentlemen's Seats and AV'atcring Places througRout the kingdom. N. B. Serves Carlton House. [•«• See the Cut on the Title-page.^ KEW MEDICAL BOARD. ^¥^0 THE AFFLICTED. — When persons employ themselves -*- to relieve the sufferings of theirfellow-creatures, they ought to be men experienced in the diseases they profess to relieve, and to be acquainted with the causes of tlie complaint. Dr. SLOP, a Professional Gentleinun, and a Member of the Royal College of Sir John's, a regular Lirencious in Fee- seek, and an o/ttli/ing Doctor in the Luw-t/ell Li/ing-in Infirmary, has been induced, by the dreadful ravages of the TYPOPHOBIA, in the ujiper ra)iks of Society, to make that disease his particular study. From a dreadful habit, contracted by juvenile inattentions at school, the mind becomes enervated in after-life, and is afflicted by a series of the most distressing apprehensions. This mental debility is so excessive as to make the ])atient imagine himself in danger from every /«.;/* that stirs. All that can be done in this stage, is to diminish the symptoms of the unhappy sufi'erers, by strengthening their habit. But this can only be eflected by a mode of treatment peculiar to Dr. SLOP, who has been induced to establisli a NEW MEDICAL BOARD, where his Bark is administered in mouthfuls, pro- perly prepared by able assistants, to those who cannot take it in the gross. The complaint, in its most dreadful forms, and of however long standing, is immediately relieved in patients of both sexes, who explain the nature of their symptoms, with a ])roper fee. The COMMITTEE of the NEW MEDICAL BOARD, sit daily at their Establisliment, Walker's Hotel, No. 6, Bridge-street. N. B. — A street-door, and a brass plate in the passage. BRIDGE-STREET GANG. 21 The Freeborn Knslii-liman. DR. SLOP'S OBSCENITY. The Slop-pail report of the Attorney-General's Speech (in the House of Commons) the 3rtl of July (1821), makes that officer say, that ' Horatio Orton went to King's shop to buy an INDECENT Caricature.' The natiu'al impression on every mind is, that it was an OBSCENE print; because the term indecent is never applied to a print, without implying obscenity. It was not only quite in character for Slop, who amused his readers with the obscenity of ' FRESH FIG- LEAVES FOR ADAM AND EVE,' but it suited his purpose as a Member of the Bridge-Street Gang, to fix OBSCENITY upon a political caricature. A copy of the print alluded to, which is intituled the ' Free-born Englishinun,^ is placed above, that the public may determine whether it is, or is not OBSCENE. Every one who looks at it will naturally be astonished at the impudence of the impu- tation, and some perhaps be induced to call the utterer by that short but natural appellation which no honest man in society ever ap- plied but to a miscreant, who ought to have it burnt in upon his forehead as a mark to avoid him by. A ' curtain ' before this print, to save Slop from the hifamy its appearance brands him with, would be iTiore serviceable to him now, than, it is to be hoped, his ' CURTAIN BEFORE POTIPHAR'S WIFE ' was amusing to his readers. 22 BRIDGE-STREET GANG. inquisitional Association, FOR OPPOSING THE PROGRESS OF KNOWLEDGE AND CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES. PRESIDENT— SIR JOHN SEf^EL, Knt. LL.D. ADDRESS. [Vi'/vlhiuinsisa Parody «;)on ^A« 'Addrecs'y/McCONSTITUTIONAL ASSOCIATIOX, „,w. in suffering xnp In„,„, V among tlicm | and certainly It mil mm- fc ^Ktttmlh m till eometliiuB like the Spiinish ln,uisil.on be .» &.c/»W.- —ne.orderol London .11 THE -DAMNABLE ASSOCIATIOnT^ TroTlNF^K^inNQjlSITUJX ley : ,,r U,.,,;ll' , fM, T„, ■•/« Meriar nnrof ihe DEN in Bridge S/rec/, mlh Ihe GANG ol IVork. OF BLACK FTxIAHS: ■"%, — le rist on j- IJUII' =^hfOM- X s i'« /iV/ffW.'—Rr (-order of I, ^^F BLACK FRi BRIDGE-STREET GANG. 23 —hatred of hypocrisy— querulous impatience of unjust control and illegal restraint — ridicule of vain and ostentatious pretenders to all sound learning, experience, and knowledge — interruption of the courses of Sir Manasseh Masseh Lopez, and derangement of the great concerns and enterprizes of the Court Nevmnen during the Coronation. The Press, that great and abominable bore to paw-paw life — that interest- ing machine for diffusing the scent of the Slop-pail, has unhappily become, in the hands of the tax-payers, a lever, to shake the very foundations of owr order. Its power, which within the last century has been multiplied a hun- dred fold, may now be said to reign paramount over vice ; and to those friends to themselves, who dig deep into the fat of the land, it cannot but be matter of serious alarm to observe, that a very large proportion of our periodical publications is under the direction either of avowed enemies of the close boroughs, or of persons whose sole principle of action is opposed to our own private and self-sell interest. Every heart and voice is employed with daily increasing boldness to render the people acquainted with the proceedings of the borough-mongers — to show them that they are not represented by those whom they have not elected — to seduce them from their long affliction and allegiance to our sovereignty ; and finally, to bring about a Reformation, on which the prosperity, the internal happiness, and the political greatness of the empire, must inevitably be established — and our interests be sacrificed. As it is clear, that isolated and single-handed exertion is utterly in- adequate to more than a grope at the good things arising from the present state of disorder, and that we should not, perhaps, get a mouthful a-piece ; so it is to be feared, that the government and legislature might render our contest for them difficult, without an active, zealous, and persevering botheration against the reformingly disposed individuals of the community, which bothe)-ation, to be effectual, must be a running fire, and a continued insult towards such individuals. Persuaded that by these means alone the said goodthingsam be arrested ; and feeling that to .arrest them, if possible, is our bounden duty, the Mem- bers of this Society will immediately throw the country into alarm and riot ; they have therefore adopted the following Resolutions : \st. That they will use their best ex'ei-tions to maintain Mr. Murray, and to support the due execution of his law. 2nd. That they will employ their influence, p'oscriptively and corrup- tively, in discountenancing and opposing the dissemination of the principles of the Revolution of 1688. Zrd. That they will encourage persons of temerity in the twitterary world to exert their nullabilities in diluting the sophistries, circu- lating the illusimis, and disposing of the falsehoods which are necessarily employed by the Committee of this Association to mislead the people, 4th. That they willresm't to such expedients as Mr. Murray may deem necessary, to restrain the publishing and ciren luting of those truths which he may stigmatize as seditimu and treasonable libels. 24 BRIDGE-STREET GANG. In wishing lliat THE Press should he securely c/moir/f, the Mcmbei's of this Society have no dpsire to limit their own bother. On the contrary, their abuse of the Queex, their inflammatory representations ai!;ainst her and her friends, and tlie circulation of the Slop-paii. should be unrestrained. But the statements respectinej the j)u])lic prostitution of public men, the detec- tion of ^'fti*, the reduction of salaries, the limitation of the pension list, the reduction of the army, the reasons for retrenchment, aiid the arofuments' for any kind of reform, are inveterately hostile to the pul)lic and private views of the Members of this Society, and favourable only to whatever tends to improve the nation, and elevate the Pkess itself. — This system tnust be suppressed. This Association is estallished on the broad principle of opposing the attempts now made to overthrow the abuses crept into the civil institutions of the State. It has, therefore, been determined, 1st. To establish a Fee Fuxd for the use and application of INIr. Murray, as he shall see fit. 2nd. To appoint a Committee fm- seenring all the Places, Offices, Pensiom, Employments, Emoluments, Contracts, Jobs, Patronage, Power, and Influoice, of every sort, in the Church, the Army, the Navy, the Treasury, and every department of Government, as well as the Bank, the India-house, and the great commercial and other public bodies, for the use and enjoyment of the Members of this Society, wholly and solely. 3rd. To adopt a system of Correspondence with those members who live at a distance, and to establish Associations throughout the countn,', for the purpose of procuring Informatiou of all kinds concerning the conduct and connexions of all persons who will not co-operate in these objects. Most earnestly, therefore, does this Society call upon all to whom a maintenance, out of the public purse, is dear, upon tliose who value thi- places they hold at the expense of the country, or the permanence of the present Administration, to jo'n them in promoting these objects and prin- ciples. IF THE SOCIETY BE ONCE ESTABLISHED, 27 tvill be ena- bled to institute AN INQUISITION INTO THE PRIVATE CONCERNS OF EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN THE K11(sg elndsr nulndu arorwor aukrm omu adonomnanvra wrgsum wilmiaru aonnounceanatinkrobpininon nowsandng alhough ncorgble snns nlnoan, aononanao wastaaawg foaw nao aao oaumlkwnc oamj, onnl oanwmmon a oni armp oonan maoskw akjgwtonnal en-acwgsf oaunmdcb anoumclb, &c. : whose a'amno aumnoar ws nwjkoganuara, gsoawquln oaorqlaowgumlh irritamenoo eadobilltuxiw rw, anda mwasnoiau nnum ancb Inand. 34 iiflinor of dfasljion, Fliilosophors are of opinion, that it' the lute Coronation had not taken place, tlie sun would liave refused to shine, corn refused to grow, and the people refused to live. The Lord of Misiil'lk, is considered by foreij^n writers as a personage rarely to be met with out of England. TIte wild-heads of the parish, flocking together, crowned him with great solemnity, adopted him for their king, anointed him, and then chose a number of " lustie guttes, like himself," to wait upon His Majesty, and guard his noble person. These he invested with green, yellow, and other colours; and as though they were not gaudy enough, they bedecked themselves with scarfs, ribbons, and laces, adding gold rings, precious stones, and other jewels. They also \mA hobl)i/-hwses, dragons, and other whimsies, and with piping and drum- ming, and bells jingling, they skirmished their hobby-horses, and otlier monsters among the throng, and urofi'Ssionul in .lino, ill 11h !ii'j>oul (livcrtiu^ tliis pr^'jiidice against 1ms character, he applied lo the Lord Chancellor, the Master of the Rolls, the Vice Chan- cellor, and the twelve Judges, to subscribe to a book on Conveyancing, which he proposed to publish, and he received from them the most kind and condescending attention, with their permission to place their names at the head of his list of subscribers. He obtained a similar permission from the greater part of the gentlemen within the bar at the Court of Chancery ; from some of the leaders of his own circuit, and many other members of his profession. Distress and poverty, however, have pre- vented the completion of this design. It is painful to state that Mr. Hone and his wife and children have frequently been reduced to the actual want of the common necessaries of life, and he has with difficulty preserved a sufficiency of raiment to appear in the situation of a gentle- man. " All this weight of niisfortime has been as unmerited as distressing. So far is Mr. Hone from adopting his brother's I'elig-ious or political opi- nions, that he actually abandoned his society, after having repeatedly made the most affectionate and earnest, though unavailing, protests against his proceedings. They are the children of a religious and virtuous father, to whose principles and maxims of conduct is to be ascribed the resigna- tion and fortitude with which Mr. Hone has borne the heavy calamity under which he has been suffering. " An oppoi tunity has been found for enabling Mr. Hone to emigrate to one of the colonies, with a fair prospect of maintaining himself and family by his profession. " The difficulty of his availing himself of this escape from want, consists in his inability to purchase the necessary outfit for himself and family, and to defray the expences of the voyage. On the most moderate esti- mate, seven or eight hundred pounds will be required for this purpose. In the hope of raising this sum, several gentlemen at the bar have opened a subscription ; and Messrs. Hoares, in Fleet-street, will receive any money which may be collected. If you should feel disposed to assist in this object, you will perhaps have the goodness to contribute as expedi- tiously as possible, as it is of the utmost importance lliat Mr. Hone should not lose the opportunity of sailing in tiie present autumn. "We have the honour to be, " Sir, " Your most obedient humble Servants, "John IIaithp.y, "JamI'S Sriii'iiiiN, JuN. "J. H. KoE. *^ Lincoln's Inn; \%tk August, \^2'3" This statement, lithographically printed without the slightest knoAvledge on my part that it had been in con- templation, was two days in circulation among the gentlemen at the bar and on the rolls of the courts before I heard of it from an utter stranger. My feelings on the occasion, a brother only, and a brother only so circumstanced, can imagine. I had long known of my brother's embarrass- ments, but by this means I first obtained information of their magnitude, and that such serious allegations regarding my- self were extensively promulgated. It is not my purpose to comment ; yet, as the circular speaks of my brother's "protests against mi/ proceedings," I must remark that these protests were no more than ob- jections verbally urged to my political opinions and publi- cations, except a single letter during the late queen's trial, remonstrating against a pamphlet I wrote on that subject which he saw advertised as ready to appear, and acquainting me that if it did, our intercourse must cease. His letter was certainly "earnest," and "affectionate;" and, as certainly, a "protest" against my "proceeding," Because I adopted that proceeding, which had been several weeks in preparation, and for several weeks publicly announced in the newspapers, " he actually abandoned my society," and we never met in a room till after the issue of the circular signed by Mr. Raithby, Mr. Stephen, and Mr. Koe. 8 The topic of that circular is to me a painful one, and I would fain avoid it; but to my children and to my excellent wife, who are dear to me as my life-blood — to the public — to that portion of the public especially who having been ray especial friends, yet know of me only through evil report and good report, — to myself, with something of the self-respect which every one entertains who is not an exception to our common nature, and not to be excepted from civilized society — to these, and more than these, I owe that I should seem as 1 am, and not as I have been misconceived. On Sunday, the Slst of August, the circular vvas inserted in the John Bull, with recommendations of the purpose that the gentlemen who signed it had in view, and with animad- versions on myself by the editor of that newspaper, in the course of which I am denominated an advocate of " blas- phemy." The following remark was appended to the cir- cular. "This measure is sanctioned by the Lord Chan- cellor; — and THE Lord Chief Justice Abbott, Mr. Justice Bayley, Mr. Justice Best, Mr. Attorney General, &c. &c. have subscribed." The Sun^ evening paper, copied the John Bull article verbatim, and it after- wards appeared in certain country papers. On Sundaj^, the 14th of September, the John Bull reverted to the subject in the following statement. "MR. HONE THE BARRISTER." " Wc have received a communication from llic gentlemen who signed the "circular" respecting the case of Mr. Hone, in which they request us to stale, that we did not receive the " circular" which we published in our last Number but one, cither from Mr. Hone himself, or from any of those whose names are subscribed to it. "It is most true we did not; and we are most ready to relieve Mr. Hone from the suspicion that he did any act likely to attract public attention, cither to his own circumstances, or the faults of a brotiicr, for whom, as 9 onr presc'iit corrfispondcnls say, ' he cannot cease lo feci a deep afFcctioil :>ii(l anxious interest.' "Tlie letter was forwarded to iis by a person zealously anxious for Mr. Hone's success, and we, witli the best intentions, (for which we arc pleased to sec the gentlemen who iiavc since addressed us give us credit) added our influence to its circulation. It is by no means unsatisfactory to hear, from the same source, that ' the subscription has materially increased in consequence of our publication ;' but our correspondent adds ' that Mr. Hone, having suffered much in his health and spirits, was painfully affected by seeing his name in a public newspaper, and feels still more dis- tressed at being supposed accessary to the publication of a letter which seems to make him the author of a public censure upon the conduct of so near a relation. " We are extremely sorry to have wounded Mr. Hone's feelings, or to have given to the world that which it appears was intended exclusively for the profession ; we most willingly here bear testimony to the fact, that the letter was not sent to us by Mr. Hone, nor with his knowledge. We must be allowed to add, however, that, considering the vast number of gentlemen now engaged in the law, (supposing the letter originally to have been written under the sanction of Mr. Hone,) the communication of his sentiments and opinions upon his brother's public conduct to so largo a body of persons seems to us to differ very little, at least in spirit, to a general publication of them to the world at large." One fact was certain from the circular, — the critical si- tuation of my brother's affairs; another was equally certain, that the letter itself was a strenuous effort by his friends to relieve him ; and, under these circumstances, after calm consideration it appeared to me that there was only one point on which I ought to claim explanation. From the time of my trials, it suited that portion of the public press which advocates the political opinions espoused by my brother, to connect my name with anti-Christian writers and publishers. Now, if I had purposed serious notice of daily calumnies, I should unhesitatingly have referred to my brother, not doubting his power, or his willingness, had the necessity been apparent, to have given conclusive testimony in rebuttal of the charges of irre- ligion. But the representation in the circular, that he did 10 notadopt my " religious opinions," purported, to public ap- prehension, that these were in fact the irreligious opinions publicly imputed to me. It purported an antithesis, a con- tradistinction; it was a clear line of separation, with Joseph on the one side religious — William on the other irreligious; and hence the representation in my brother's behalf became presumptive proof against me of a previously-unattested charge, which I should have confidently relied on disproving by my brother himself. That my brother, in consequence of his being my brother, " was gradually deserted by his clients until he found him- self deprived of his whole professional income," is an ex-parle statement. I neither deny nor admit it. It is a point that there is no necessity for us ever to moot: in private we ought not, and in public we cannot. This is the matured determination of my judgment upon that statement which dropped a sudden and heavy blow upon my heart. It may be information to some, that I have a heart. Deciding thus, and confining myself to the religious ground, I required explanation upon that alone. For ob- vious reasons, arising from the best feelings towards my brother, I did not seek it of the gentlemen who signed the circular, but, at the beginning of September, addressed myself to him, and his answer is subjoined verbatim. "40, Chancery Lane; 23^ October, 1823. "My Deak William, '• You have called ray attention to the following pas- sage ill the circular, which to my great regret has lately appeared in some public newspapers, namely, " So far is Mr. Hone from adopting his brother's religious or political opinions, that he actually abandoned his society after having made the most afiFectionate and earnest, though unavailing protests against his proceedings.' You consider that this passage is open to the construction, tliat I abandoned your society in consequence of iireligious opinions, or conduct on your part, during the time we were associated : you ask me to explain that part of the circular' u which I do the more readily on account of tlie anxiety you express con- cerning it. '' In our former familiar conversations, you have sometimes questioned parts of tlic text of the Old and New Testament, and controverted cer- tain doctrines ; this led to the differences which usually arise on discus- sions between persons of opposite theological principles: however, I did not understand you to reject Christianity, or to deny or impugn the genuineness or authenticity of the Old or New Testament as a whole. Since your Trials, numerous imputations of irrcligion have, as you are aware, been publicly urged against you ; but, if it be inferred that, as your brother, and from my private knowledge of your sentiments on religious subjects, during our intercourse within that period, I knew those imputations to be true, the inference is erroneous; yet your silence under them for the last three years or more, induced me, in common with many other persons, to conclude that you admitted the charge, and hence, during the latter period, I have abstained from having any further inter- course with you, although my brotherly regards were far, very far, from being extinguished. " 1 have thus made a short point of my explanation, instead of going into the subject or minutiae- " I would now add a few words to this, which is, probably, nearly the last letter which I shall have occasion to write to you before I leave England, preparing, as I am, to depart ere long for a very distant part of the world ; I anticipate with, I assure you, the keenest sensations, the moment when I shall have to say farewell to you for, at least, some years: as future events are wisely kept from our knowledge, it may, possibly, prove a iinal parting in reference to (his world ; and at such a time it is my hearfs desire that we, who are the children of the same parents, should take leave as brethren, each, as he hopes for forgiveness from the Father of Mercies, frankly forgiving the other every wrong that he may consider his brother to have done him in any way whatever. This will afford peace of mind to both, and, though personally far apart, we may yet remain one in heart and affection, and if preserved to meet again in this life, which I earnestly pray may be the case, I trust that each may learn tiiat the other has been walking in the path of rectitude, and reaped the full reward of honourable conduct. The immense distance at which, in a few months, we shall be placed from each other, will pre- vent either of us from practically ministering to the necessities, if any, mental or pecuniary, of tiic other; nevertheless, one thing may be done, — we may entreat him who has been our Protector from our infancy to 12 nianliuod, to further ns with his continual iielp, aiul thna he nssuroil uf wcathciiiig every storm. •'Before I close my letter, 1 would remark, that it lias hitherto been my most studious endeavour to avoid every thing that might have the semblance of an attack upon your character or reputation, and I much regret that the diction of llie circular sliould be liable to have such a construction upon it, or be considered in that light by yourself or your friends, as I can truly affirm that it was never so intended. Of course 1 have had my own opinion of the nature and tendency of your public acts, nor have I concealed that opinion at such times as it became necessary for me to avow it, though even then I did not forget our near relationship, nor could it possibly have escaped attention, that, on these occasions a brother's feelings were creating a painful conflict in my mind. " Numerous arrangements for my departure have unavoidably prevented me from writing to you ere this ; and, in conclusion, I would express a hope, that nothing I have said will be deemed by you as recrimina- tion: that is far from my intention. Neither have I ventured to offer any thing in the shape of advice, as it might be deemed surplusage and obtrusive : you know my heart and views, and I think that I know your's ; — each may therefore conclude what would be the counsel of the other ; and, if there be a reciprocal determination to continue to act witli truth and integrity, we and our families must ultimately be benefited, and our happiness and their's will be promoted and secured. "Believe me, ** My dear William, " Your ever affectionate Brother, "Joseph Hone." Religion is a subject on which, more than on any other, the best men differ verbally, and agree practically. My brother had never fallen in with the gross imputations of irreligion urged against me, after our intercourse ceased in July 1820, if a little Biblical inquiry had enabled him fully to comprehend the objects and limits of mine, when I incidentally alluded to topics connected with it during our previous intimacy. Nor, if he had studied my character, could he have been induced to conclude that my silence i3 imported admission of the imput-ations. Separated in boy- hood, our intercourse throughout life has only been occasional, and seldom lasting for more than a few months, after lapses of years. Varying- in temper, opinion, and con- struction of mind, there are few points of contact between us. He has seen me " bear the proud man's contumely, the insult of rude ignorance, the sarcasm of malice, the hired censure of the sycophantic critic, whose preferment depends on the prostitution both of knowledge and con- science, and the virulence of the venal newspaper* ;" he mistook my patience for weakness, and my forbearance for inanity. In our recent conversations I gather that a main reason for his supposing, as he affirms in his explanatory letter, that I admitted the charge of irreligion was, that I had not answered an article on the Apocri/phal New Testament, in the Quarterly Review for October 1821. Certainly I had contemplated, and as I have recently stated, had commen- ced an answer ; " when, abridgment of my leisure, but above all, the subsidence of my resentment into profound contempt for the flagitious frauds of the reverend reviewer, and a conviction that those who were qualified to judge of his article would see its mendacity, determined me not to engage in polemics."+ I underrated that article, by assuming thatit would not be overrated; and I now do somewhat, not as a stepping-stone to controversy, for which I have un- conquerable dislike, but to convince unprejudiced minds that the Quarterly reviewer is indebted to my silence for the success of his labors. As I purpose not to write another word on any topic Connected with this pamphlet, it becomes me to state, that ''* Dr. Vicesimus Knox, Spirit of Despotism, Pref. p. xi. t Ancient Mysteries described. Pref. p. iii. c 14 though the publicity given by the circular to the difference between my brother and myself was to me a source of sorrow and misery, my brotherly affection was undiminished, and is unextinguishable. The period approaches for his proceeding to a distant colony, and we shall part, not merely in semblance, but in reality, as brethren. We, and our families, mutually participate in deep regret at a dis- junction that, as regards this world, may be for ever; and our best feelings and most ardent affections go forth for each other's happiness and prosperity. My sole aim in the remaining pages is "A Refutation of the Quarterly Review of the Apocryphal New Testa- ment," and they will contain a few remarks upon the strictures of the Rev. Dr. Butler, Archdeacon of Derby, and the Rev. Thomas Rennell, Rector of Kensington. I am informed that the readers of the article in the Quarterly Review, consider it an attack that admits of no defence. The reviewer advances in apparently great strength, takes up his positions in a regular way, places the canon in front very orderly, and persons of little inquiry deem it impossible that I can resist such a force. But it is not force : had they reconnoitred, they would have found it trick. If they will follow me beyond his lines — and hitherto they have not taken the trouble to go further — they will see that he is a mere showman throwing shadows, which not being examined pass for realities. 1 pledge myself to prove that every — not the greater part of the charges, but that etieri/ charge urged against me by the reviewer is a wilful falsehood ; and tliat every statement in support of each charge is a deliberately-manufactured fraud. I shall take them in the order most convenient to myself, but I shall take them all.* * The whole of the reviewer's charges are aiiswerctl in the following pages, or in the notes below them. 15 The Quarterly reviewer is one of that stamp whose motto is "We murder to dissect," and who first slay the author in order to cut up his book with impunity. Pur- suing- this convenient process, the reviewer, in his first paragraph, calls me " a wretch, as contemptible as he is wicked:" he informs his readers that I am " a poor illite- rate creature, far too ignorant to have any share in the composition" of the work ; and, in the final words of the same paragraph, he denominates it a "nefarious publica- tion." In this way he sets out to do " the state some service."* Speaking of me as the editor of the Apocryphal New Testament, the reviewer says: "In pagevi. of his preface, (and afterwards in the work itself,) he affords ample proof of his ignorance of even the commonest matters, by the triumph with which he announces to his readers his fancied discoveries that the Apostles' Creed was not written by the Apostles ! and that it did not originally contain the article of Christ's descent into hell !" The reviewer puts two notes of admiration to indicate astonishment ftt my twofold igno- rance. Buthe wasnotastonished; hecouldnotbe astonished; for neither " in p. vi. of the preface," nor " afterwards in the work itself," have I " fancied" that the facts as to the creed and the descent were my "discoveries;" nor have I expressed a syllable of " triumph," or feeling, from which previous *' ignorance" of those facts could be inferred. In short, I have not made a single observation upon them of any kind * " Illiterate crcatuic," as tlic reviewer describes me, I am in what he would call good company. " The illiterature of the Grand Monarque, Louis XIV. went so far, that, to tlie last, be could hardly write his name. He formed it out of six strait strokes, and a lino of beauty, which first stood tlius — I I I I I I S : these he afterwards perfected, as well as he was able, and the result was— LOUIS." This autographic ftict is in Pcgge''s Anecdotes, 8vo, 1803, p. 48. 16. whatever. His notes of admiration are strokes of false- hood. Again : the reviewer charges me with "disingenuousness," because I have said in a note to my preface, " For large particularsof Christ's descent into hell see the gospel of Nicodemus, chap. xiii. to xx.'' He remarks, that, as in that gospel " hell" is represented as the place of torments, I assuredly "knew that this was not the sense in which the word is used in the creed." Here the " disingenuousness" is not in me, but in him. My reference to the apocri/phal gospel was for apoayphal particulars. The reference, w hich stands in a note on a wholly different subject, occupying the whole of five pages of the preface, has nothing to do with the sense of the creed, regarding the descent, one way or the other. The reviewer's misconstruction of it is a jug- gling and violent perversion of its obvious meaning.* The commencement of my introduction to the Gospel of Mary ^ in the Apocryphal New Testament, being selected by the Reviewer for his most violent attack, 1 subjoin it. * " Hell, as a place of torments, was not the sense in which the word is used in the Creed." So says the reviewer, who I decline to take as autho- rity upon tliat or any otlier point. The Church of England would be an authority, if, as a Church, siie had declared the sense in which the word is to be taken; however she has not, and therefore she is no authority. It is true that *' iiell, as a place of torments," is now usually disclaimed by Church of England expositors on the Creed : but what was the sense in which it was taken by those who drew up the forty-two Articles of the Church of England ? or by those who reduced the forty-two to thirty-nine Articles, and cut off a part of the old Article on the Descent into Hell ? Has not hell, as it stands in the Creed, been taken as a place of torments by protestant prelates and clergy of tiie Church of England since that time? Finally, in what sense is the word taken at this very hour by those persons who repeat the Creed, and who never hear or conceive of hell than as a place of torment ? In Ancient Mysteries Described, § v. I have cited several old instances of this belief, and described engravings that illustrate it. 17 " Ti^E Gospel of the Birth of Marv. "In the |>iiniitivc nges llicrc was a Gospel extant Ijcaiiiig this name, attributed to St. Mattlicvv, and received as genuine and autlicntic by several of the ancient Christian sects. It is to be found in the works of Jerome, a fatlier of tlie Ciiurch who flourished in the fourth century, from whence the present translation is made. His contemporaries, Epiphanius, Bisliop of Salamis, and Austin, also mention a Gospel under this title. Tiie ancient copies diflfercd from Jerome's, for, from one of them, the learned Faustus, a native of Britain, who became Bishop of Riez, in Provence, endeavoured to prove that Christ was not the Son of God till after his baptism ; and that he was not of the house of David, and tribe of Judab, because, according to the Gospel he cited, the virgin herself was not of this tribe, but of the tribe of Levi; her father being a priest of the name of Joachim. Epiphanius likewise cites a passage concerning tlie death of Zacharias, whicli is not in Jerome's copy." It is essentially necessary that each part of this introduc- tion should be remembered, because upon its statements the reviewer grounds his heaviest charge ; and I entreat the reader to observe particularly that the introduction merely shows that Epiphanius and Austin mention the Gospel of Mary ; that Epiphanius quotes a passage from it ; that Faustus deduces a doctrine from it ; that neither the fact nor the doctrine is derivable from Jerome's copy; and that, therefore, " the ancient copies diifered from Jerome's." It is obvious that my introduction is so drawn as to leave its reader in doubt ; and, on that very account, a candid antagonist would incline to respect, and disdain to misre- present me. Not, however, to anticipate, the reviewer's charge shall be set forth in his own words. He says : — "To each of the assertions, namely, that the Gospel which the Editor presents to his readers was received by several ancient sects— that it is to be found in St. Jerome, and tliat it is quoted by Epiphanius and. Austin, we now proceed to give a direct denial, accompanied by proofi that the Editor was aware of the falsehood of them all !" This, with his covetous note of admiration, reads well ; it is easy and bold, and has an air of sincerity mightily 18 imposing. Permit me to introduce him more particularly. He maintains his spirit in the following amplification. "First, theiijWC assert lliat the Gospel before us was not received by any of the ancient Christian sects. Here, as in many other cases, tlie original spurious Gospel has disappeared, and the present is a miserable forgery of a later age, which has taken its place and name. Of this, the editor could not possibly be ignorant, as the fact is positively stated even in the title to that very chapter of Jones's work* from which he has taken and perverted the facts in his Preface. Jones there asserts that * the present Gospel is dino,rent from the old one,' and in proof brings forward two fragments of the original Gospel preserved by Epiphanius and Austin, the first of which does not occur in the present work, and the other directly contradicts one ofits most remarkable statements. •' Svcondly, we assert that this Gospel is not contained in the works of Jerome, and that when the Editor maintained the contrary, he was fully aware of the falsehood of his statement. In the printed editions, indeed, of Jerome's works, from the carelessness or the scrupulousness of ]iis editors, there have been inserted three letters, one purporting to be addressed by two Bishops, Chromatius and Hcliodorus, to Jerome, requesting him to undertake a translation of this Gospel ; the otiicrs, pre- tending to be his answers, accompanied by the required translation. No one, we should imagine, could read these letters, and observe the palpa> Lie contradictions which they contain, the excessive folly of their argu- ments, and the barbarisms of the style in which they are written, without at once pronouncing them clumsy and senseless forgeries. If the editor, however, should profess his inability to detect the imposture, it would certainly be inconsistent with the rules of fair argument to limit an adver- sary's talent for misapprehension, in order to convict him of dishonesty. We must, therefore, admit his plea; but the admission will avail him nothing, for the fact is stated for him in the most decided and intelligible manner. Fabricius calls this Gospel ' Evangelium de Nativitate S. Maria3 jactatura olim sub fahis nominibus Scriptoris S. Matthaei et interprctis S. Hieronymi,' and without hesitation calls the letters to which we have al- luded the works of Pseudo-Chromatius, Pseudo-Heliodorus, and Pseudo- Jerome. Dupin says, that these Epistles are certainly spurious; and in this declaration all the learned men whose opinions Fabricius subjoins to * "Jones's Work" will be often referred to in the ensuing pages ; it is entitled "A New and full Method of settling the Canonical Authority of the New Testament. By the Rev. Jeremiah Jones. Oxford, 1798.'* 3 vols. 8vo. 19 iiis own, Pclaviiis, Vossins, Cave, and many others, wholly coincide. Casaubon, indeed, says, that Ihcrc is not a single sentence in the Latin Gospel whifih does not arjjue the tolly of those who are unable lo distin- guish between its * dirty puddle' and Jerome's golden stream. Last of all, Jones himself, whose book was never out of the Editor's hands, subscribes to the expressions of these eminent writers. We conclude, therefore, as we began, with affirming that he could not possibly be ignorant of the falsehood of the assertion which he has deliberately made." According- to this ingenious reticulation of taunt and objection, it appears that the Gospel of Mary was not translated by Jerome ; that the letters of the two bishops to Jerome, and his answers, are forgeries ; and that " the fact is stated for me in the most decided and intelligible manner by Fabricius." Stated for me! why, in a few lines after- wards, he writes that Jones's book was never out of my hands, and that I had not consulted one original source of information. Really such reviewers as mine should have good memories. Fabricius stated the fact for me ! Not upon the reviewer's showing, but upon my oun declara- tion, I hope it will be believed that I had not read that author : Fabricius is in Latin, and I am not ashamed to own that I cannot read him. If the reviewer exult upon this declaration, it will be the unsanctified triumph of malignity over misfortune : for a great misfortune it was in my childhood, a terrible misfortune, which, during- many years of manhood, I have not ceased to deplore, without power to remedy, that scholastic education was closed against me by the straitened circumstances of my honest and excellent parents. Not for me, then, has Fabricius declared his opinion that these letters are spurious. But, suppose 1 had read Fabricius; was I bound to attach implicit credit to his opinion because " Petavius, Vossius, Cave, and many others, wholly co- incide" with him ? Yes, says the Reviewer, "Jones himself, whose book was never out of the Editor's hands, subscribes lo the expressions of these eminent writers." It is impos- 20 sible to describe my contempt for the writer of this daring falsehood. Jones does not subscribe to their expres- sions. Jones says, " perhaps those Epistles may be suppo- sititious ;" but, for the opinion that they are, he instantly declares, *' I am not able yet to see that clear evidence which the writers last mentioned pretend."* Is this sub- scribing to their expressions ? If Fabricius's rejection of the present Gospel of Mary, and the correspondence be- tween Jerome and the bishops, was not stated for me, it must be recollected that it w as stated for Jones ; that Jones does not acquiesce in Fabricius's determination ; and that Jones does not deny that the "dirty puddle" of the Latin Gospel might have flowed from the " golden stream" of the Latin father. They who are acquainted with Jones's book, know his unsparing hate to imposture ; and that, if conscien- tiously he could, he gladly would have called the Epistles and the Gospel gross forgeries. He must have had good rea- son for not subscribing to the opinions of those who did call them so, and for expressing his dissent in words so marked and unequivocal, that the reviewer could not mistake it for subscription ; but, subscription suiting the reviewer's pur- pose better than dissent, he preferred the fraud to the truth. '* The original spurious Gospel has disappeared, and the present is a miserable forgery of a later age, zohich has taken its place.''^ Is it ? In what page of Jones's volumes is this stated ? for I beg to repeat that Jones was my only authority. My Introduction affirms, in Jones's own words, that *' the ancient copies differed from Jerome's." But this, it seems, was not enough ; for my accuser says it is " a careless expression of Jones, of which I have cautiously avoided Jones's explanation." Avoided Jones's explana- tion ! The Reviewer know s that Jones gives no explana- * Jones on tbe Canon, vol. ii. p. 143. 21 tion ; he knows that all that Jones does is to show that the ancient copies did differ from Jerome's ; he knows that I do the very'same; and the reader himself sees it. I give it with only this difference, that what Jones spreads over several pages, I abbreviate in as many lines. Jones, so far from using such a bold unmistakable expression as that " the original spurious Gospel has disappeared," says, not " carelessly," but carefully, " the ancient copies differed from Jerome's." Differed from Jerome's what ? Why from Jerome's copy. Jones, after inserting the Gospel, care- fully observes, " The book of the Nativity of Mary suffered many alterations, and the ancient copies of it were very different from the present copy, which I have above pub- lished, out of Jerome's works."* Jones is a decided writer; he never minces on opinion or an expression, and, had he thought the Gospel of Mary in Jerome's works a forgery, he would have used the very word. My adherence to what I conceived was his sense, is so faithful that I express it in his own words; and my conception of that sense is corrobo- rated by Dr. Lardner, who, , speaking of this Gospel, says, " our present copies are very much altered from the ancient ones."+ '' We assert that this Gospel is not contained in the works of Jerome^ and that when the Editor maintained the contrary^ he was fully aware of the falsehood of his stater mentJ'' This is the Reviewer's assertion. LiCt it be observed that I "maintained" nothing: I merely said that the Gospel was " in the works of Jerome ;" I did not even say that Jerome translated it, or that he was applied to by two bishops for that purpose. Referring to Jeremiah Jones, let us see what he asserts. He divides his work on the Canon into parts; the first two parts treat of lost Apocry- * Jones, vol. ii. p. 131. t Lardncr's Works, 41o. vol. iv. p. 631. D 22 phal Books, and the third part o{ extant Apocryphal Books. In the first part he confines himself to " a complete enu- meration of all the lost Apocryphal Books of the New Testament ;" and by way of preliminary, he gives " A Catalogue of Books not extant now, formerly published under the names of our Saviour, his Apostles, their Com- panions, &c."* At the end of the catalogue, he says, " These are all the Apocryphal Books not extant, which I have been able to find any mention of in the writings of the four first centuries after our Saviour. I proposed, indeed, to have annexed here the catalogue of the books still extant in like manner as the not extant ; but this catalogue will be so necessary in the third 'part of this work, that I shall defer the producing it in full, or at large, till then." Jones does not insert the Gospel of Mary in this Catalogue of Books not extant. In the second part, wholly confining himself to ^' a par- ticular and critical inquiry into each of the lost Apocry- phal Books," he makes not the least inquiry concerning the Gospel of Mary; but, pn the contrary, most care- fully assigns as a reason for not doing it, that " the Protevangelion of James, and the Gospel of the Birth of Man/, are two Apocryphal Books now extant, and will be produced in the //«Vc? part."+ Accordingly, in the third part, which enumerates and considers none but extant Apocryphal Boolis of the first four centuries, he inserts the Gospel of Mary in Latin, w ith a translation into English. He entitles it, " The Gospel of the Birth of Mar 7/, published out of Jerome's icorks -"X and then, by way of introduc- tion, states the following reasons for publishing this Gospel — "1. Because there was certainly a Gospel extant under this name in the primitive ages of Christ ianifj/. * Jones, vol. i. p. 29. f Il>id. p. 4Gi. % Ibid. vol. ii. p. 77. 23 " 2. Because it was received by seteral of the ancient Christian her clicks. " 3. Because it passed formerly under the name of St. Matthew, " 4. Because many of its relations were credited by the ancient Catholick Christians in different countries. " 5. Because it contains the same things us the Prote- vangelion of St. James. " The ONLY place of the ancient writings in which it is EXTANT is among Jerome's Works (Epist. ad Chromatium et Heliodorum.) The occasion of its being found there was the desire of Chromatius and Helio- dorus, two Bishops, io Jerome, that he would translate it out of Hebrew, and give them his judgment upon it. Their Letter to hitn, with his Answer to them, and another Letter of his concerning this Gospel, I have published after this Gospel." On Jones's reasons for inserting this Gospel being com- pared with my Introduction to the Gospel, it will be seen how very cautiously I kept to his language ; and that he alone is my authority for asserting that the Gospel of Mary is to be found in the works of Jerome.* The opinion that it is foisted into Jerome's works, it is evident that Jones declines; and it is equally evident that the reviewer, with that fact before his eyes, deliberately fabricated the con- * '• Saynt Jiierorae rehercetli in his prologue, wiian lie was a cliyldc he had a lytell boke of thystory of the iiatyuite of the virgyii Maryc, but, as he remembered a long tyme after, ho translated it by the prayer of some persones." — Golden Legend. . "There are, who hunt out antiquated lore: And never but on musty authors pore." Mr. Gifford's Persius, Sat. i. vcr. 138. The extract from the Golden Legend is for amusement, not authority, 21 traiy, for the purpose of assciting that the Gospel is not contained in the works of Jerome, and that when 1 stated it was, I was fully aware of the falsehood of the state- ment. It being proved that Jones does not assent to the notion that the Epistles of the two Bishops and Jerome are forge- ries, and that he inserts the Gospel of Mary " out of Je- rome's works" as a book of the first four centuries still extant, he must have had strong reasons for not falling in with the opinions of Fabricius and other critics. I presume that he may have derived his reasons from Jerome himself. " Never," observes Beausobre, "did Constantino VI. whom the miserable monks scandalized with the contempt- ible name of Copronymus, discover more wisdom and pru- dence than when he forbad the title saint to be given to any except the apostles." In the spirit of these " miserable monks," the reverend reviewer dignifies his favorite father by the appellation of " St. Jerome." It was of better men than the reviewer that Beausobre says, " What provokes beyond all patience, is to see that, in order to defend opinions evidently false, a sentence is quoted from an ancient writer, and puffed off with the title of a saint, and a great saint. People on hearing this superb title are seduced into an imagination that they hear an oracle, and sincerely believe that justness of thought, accuracy of expression, solidity of reasoning, and demon- strative evidence, are necessarily connected with saintship and great saintship; they even fancy that such men were under the immediate influence of the Holy Spirit. Such as these pretend to shackle what is most at liberty in us — reason and faith ; and this, under pretence of a religious reverence for the fathers, while the true design is to main- tain the credit of errors and manifest abuses, and to domi- neer over the consciences of mankind."* The reviewer's * Beausobre Hist. duManiclicism. Sec Robinson's Eccles. Res. p. 184. 25 " St. Jerome" was the foster-father of the Apocryphal Gos- pel of the Nazarencs. Jerome's own account of the affair is, that Matthew was the first who composed a Gospel of Christ in the Hebrew language ; that this Hebrew Gospel was preserved in the library of Cesseria ; that the Naza- reans of BersEa in Syria, made use of it ; that they granted him the favor of writing it out; that he translated it into Greek ; and that he also translated it into Latin. Jerome calls it " tile Gospel which the Nazarenes and Ebionites use, which I lately translated out of Hebrew into Greek, and is by most esteemed the authentic Gospel of Matthew."* He elsewhere speaks of it as the Gospel " which I have lately translated into Greek and Latin, and which Origen often used.t" Jones says that there is not the least intima- tion of any version having been made of it till Jerome made his translations, which, as well as the original Hebrew Gospel, are lost. Beda, who wrote in the seven- teenth century, observes of this Gospel of the Nazarenes, that it "is not to be esteemed among the Apocryphal (or spurious) but Ecclesiastical Histories, because Jerome himself, who translated the sacred Scripture, has taken many testimonies out of it, and translated it into Greek and Latin. :|;" After all this, Jones says, that Jerome affirms of this Gospel, that it was the same as the Gospel according to the Twelve Apostles, which Jerome " expressly rejects as Apocryphal ! as a book of the heretics ! as written by men destitute of the spirit and grace of God ! without a due regard to truth !"§ The Gospel of the Nazarenes is variously estimated; but Jones calls it a spurious and infamous forgery. The clearest account and largest quotations from it now extant, are to be found in Jerome's works ; and from these, which are * Jones i. {). 280. t Ibid. p. 27G. t Jones on the Caiioii; vol. i. p. 283. § Ibid, p. 299, 26 translated by Jones, I select one as a specimen. Jerome says, "Whoever reads the Book o^ Canticles, iind Mill under- stand by the spouse of the soul the Word of God (Christ), and will believe the Gospel which is intitled, The Gospel according to the Jlehrexcs, which I lately translated, in which our Saviour is introduced, saying, 'Just now my mother, the Holy Ghost, laid hold on me by one of my hairs,' will not scruple to say, the Word of God was born of the Spirit, and the soul, which is the spouse of the Word, has the Holy Ghost for its mother in law." By Jones's ci- tations, it appears that this Gospel contained ludicrous and fabulous things ; such as that when Christ bade the rich man sell all, and give to the poor, " The rich man here- upon began to scratch his head :" it represents Christ as unwilling to be baptized by John ; as intim.ating that he was not baptized at all ; and questioning whether he was not a sinner : it makes Christ say, " The Holy Ghost my mother lately took me by one of my hairs, and led me to the great mountain Thabor ;" and this part Jerome refers to, in his illustration of the Canticles just quoted. To Jerome, therefore, the Greek and Latin Christians were indebted for their acquaintance with the Apocryphal Gospel of the Nazarenes, which had been concealed from their view by the Hebrew language till he unlocked the "gate" to gratify their curiosity. If Jerome could trans- late "a book of the heretics! written by men destitute of the spirit and grace of God ! without a due regard to truth !" was he disqualified for translating the Apocryphal Gospel of Mary? and if the ancient copies of the Gospel of Mary differed from Jerome's, may we not be indebted to Jerome for that difference? Baillet says, " It is agreed that St. Jerome may be the greatest saint of all translators, but that he is not the most exact: he hath taken liberties which the laws of translation will not admit."* He translated, and * Jortin's Remarks, vol. ii. p. 149. 27 did every thing at full speed. He says that he allotted him- self but three days for translating the three books of Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Solomon's Song. This is his own incredible affirmation ;* and he was obliged to confess, that, in translating Origen, when he found any thing not consonant to the common judgment and opinions of his time, and which might give offence to the '' simple people," he omitted it. Daille says, that it was his constant prac- tice to suppress what he pleased in his translations. t Was such a man unlikely to have omitted passages from the Gospel of Mary, and otherwise accommodate it to " simple people ?"' I think it probable that the " dirty puddle" of trans- lation in the Gospel of Mary, which the revievs^er says could not have proceeded from Jerome's " golden stream,'' really was an oozing from that " golden stream," and purposely bewrayed by Jerome himself. He was a great dissembler ; and believing- that others dissembled like himself, he says that the apostle Paul counterfeited igno- rance to the Galatians, because he knew they were a dull heavy people. A father who could so affirm of an apostle could readily adopt the same conduct, and aifect low and mean language to serve a turn. He affirms, too, that the quarrel between Peter and Paul was only feigned ; that they understood each other very well, and only pretended to have a difference.:]: Who does not so see that the saint's mind was fraudulent ? Dean Milner says, that learned as Jerome undoubtedly was, he was still more distinguished for vain glory than for learning; that he seems to have known too little of that sincere love of truth which is con- nected with humility; that his knowledge of theology was • Daille's Right Use, part ii. p. 44. t Ibid, part i. p. 40. I D« Pin's Eccl. Hist. (Dublin,) vol. i. p. 352. 28 contracted and low ; that the reputation of his knowledge and abilities has been much overrated ; that he contributed in a greater degree than any other writer of antiquity to the growth of superstition ; and that his learned ignorance availed more than any other cause to darken the light of the gospel.* Whatever were Jerome's virtues, he was ambitious and wily, of irascible and violent temper, cre- dulous of error, weak in principle, rancorous in resentment, and so dishonest in controversy, that he would argue any way. At one time he stoutly contended against the apos- tolical succession of bishops ; but afterwards getting em- broiled with the bishop of Jerusalem, he then contended as strongly for it.t Whether right or wrong he fought for victory, and rejected no means, however illicit, to ensure it. Employing his eloquence to restrain all females to a state of perpetual virginity, his '• golden stream" would have washed away the marriage ceremony, and the whole human race might have perished in the deluge. Jerome was a miracle-monger, a bigot, and a persecutor ; and Jones being well acquainted with his failings and labors, w as therefore very likely to think that he did trans- late the apocryphal Gospel of Mary ; that the correspon- dence between him and the two bishops was genuine; and that these Epistles and the Gospel itself were properly inserted amongst his works. At any rate, Jones does not subscribe to the opinions of preceding critics, who presumed the correspondence spurious ; nor does he say that the apocryphal Gospel of Mary is a forgery of the gospel under that name 3 but he affirms that " the only 'place of the ANCIENT writings in which it is extant is among Je- rome's Works :" he calls it " Jerome's translation;" * Nelson's Fasts, Art. Ember-days. t Milncr's Cliurch History, 8vo. 1812, vol. ii. p. 470, ot seq. 29 and he inserts It, Avith his own English translation, "among other such pieces now extant.''' It is clear that the reviewer palters with the Gospel of Mary in a double sense ; that he perverts Jones's expressions ; and that he fabricates Jones to have said what he never did say. His assertion that ^* this gospel is not contained in the works of Jerome, and that when I asserted it waS;, I was fully aware of the falsehood of the statement," is a foul malversation ; and the most scrupulous mind must be convinced of the wilful falsehood of the charge by which he seeks to dishonour me.* * However little tlio reviewer may he suspected of veracity, he assumes a particular veneration for that essential virtue, and thinks me a "dis- creditable'" person, because I suppressed "the number and names of the * several ancient Cliristian sects'' who I affirm received the Gospel of Mary." He says, " On examination it will be found that they dwindle down to two — the Gnostics and Manicheansl" This note of self-admiration at the end might have been spared. He actually docs not know that Moshcini ( Eccles. Hist. vol. i. p. 134, 139,) endeavours to account for the " diver- sity of sects" among the Gnostics. There were upwards of fifty different sects of Gnostics. How miserably as a reviewer, how scandalously as a divine, this critical character lacks ijiforraation that in eilLcr capa- city should be at his fingers' ends. The reviewer is vreicome to all he can gain by having detected an error I fell into concerning Faustus. On transcribing that name from Jones's work, I looked info the edition before the last of Watkins's very useful Biographical Dictionary, and finding that " Faustus, a learned prelate of tlie fifth century, was a native of Britain, and in 455 became BisJiop of Riez, in Provence," Sec. I wrote of the Gospel of Mary that " the ancient copies diflered from Jerome's, for from one of them ttie learned Faustus, a native vf Britain, who became BisJiop of Riez ill Provence, endeavoured to prove," &c. This was a mistake; and the reviewer gravely inquires, " Is there a single reader o^ divinity so utterly ignorant of the commonest facts, as not to be aware that Faustus was an African, a teacher of tlieManichaian heresy at Carthage?" I answer Yes, tiioiisands of readers of 'divinity ;' for this is not a fact in divinity, but a fact in ecclesiastical history, which I take permis- sion to believe is as dillcrent from divinity as Faustus the Manicbiean is different from l^'austus the bishop. Let me instance that Jerome confounds Simon the Just who met Alexander the Great when he came to Jerusalem, with Simon tiie High Priest, in the days of Herod (Jones, vol. ii. p. 151.) ; yet Jerome will not therefore be condemned to oblivion : nor will Cornelius Nepos l)e banished our schools, because, in treating professedly of the Life of Milliades the son of Cypsilas, he ascribes to him Ihe actions of another Miltiades the son of Cimon. (Lcmpriere's Classical Diet. art. Miltiades.) Besides the " divinity" blunder committed by the reviewer, in his E 30 The Introduction to the Protevangelion of James, which stands in the Apocryphal New Testament next after the Gospel of Mary, affirms, that " the allusions to tliis apocry- phalGospel in the ancient Fathers are frequent, andtheirex- pressions indicate that it had obtained a very general credit in the Christian world." I was led into this statement by Jones. 1st. Tlie contents at the head of one of his chap- ters state that " several of the relations of the Gospel of Mary and the Protevangelion have been credited by the ancients."* 2dly. He says, " Several of the accounts or relations have been credited by some ancient Christian writers. "t Sdly. He says, " This fact is mentioned and credited by Tertullian, Petrus Alexandrinus;, Origen, Epiphanius, Theophylact, and others. ":[: 4thly. He says, " This story, which is in the Protevangelion, was very much known and credited by the ancients. "§ 5thly. He says, " From all which it is very evident, that the account of Joseph's age and family, which is in the Gospel of the Birth of Mary and the Protevangelion of James, met with a very denunciation of mine concerning Faust us, be at the same time commits another, which brings us in juxta- position. He says that Toland's ♦' yVmjntor, puhlisiied ia 1G98," a Look relating to the New Testament, " gave rise to the Codex Pseudepigraphus of Fabricius." Tliis latter work regards tlie Old Testament, as its title purports, " Codex Pseudepigraphns Ftics of this Gosjjel were contained in a cataloj;ue, assigned to the tenth century, of the MSS. in the splendid conventual library of Bobbio, in the Appcnnines. Jones assijsjns great antiquity to tliis apocryphal Gospel. Irlc says, (vol. ii. p. 259,) that " the first book of Christ's Infancy, and tiic stories thereof, were forged by the Gnostics in the beginning of the second century. This is plain, from Ircneieus, 1. i. c. 17, who expressly stales that these heretics were the au- thors or inventors of these idle stories." 33 these "dark recesses" are the parts of the Apocryphal New Testament that contain the Epistles of Clement, Barnabas, Ignatius, and Polycarp, and the Sliepherd of Hermas. Under the pretence that, to " penetrate deeper" would be an infliction that he ought in mercy to be spared, the reviewer artfully conceals that two- thirds of the Apocryphal New Testament are occupied by these pieces ; all of them translated and published by Wake, archbishop of Canterbury, under the title of " The Ge- nuine Epistles of the Apostolical Fathers," in order to show the accommodation of the church of England to early worship.* The reviev/er presumed, that, by an affectation of horror, he could shock the ignorant into a belief that these "dark recesses," containing the Arch- bishop's translations, were filled by " things horrible and awfu', Which e'en to name would be unlawfu'." —Burns. Johnson explains Cant to be " a corrupt dialect used by beggars and vagabonds ; a whining pretension to good- ness in affected terms." What sturdy knave, or oily hypocrite, ever canted more subtilly than my reverend slanderer ?f * William Wake, born at Biandford in Dorsetshire, in 1657, and admitted of Christ- Church College, Oxford, in 1672; was successively doctor in divinity, canon of Christ-Church, chaj)lain to King William and Queen Mary, preacher to Gray's Inn, rector of St. James's, Westminster, dean of Exet«r, and bishop of Lincoln. On the death of Archbishop Tenison, he was translated to the metropolitan see, and be- came Lord Primate of all England, in 1716. In 1693, Archbishop Wake first published his " Genuine Epistles of llie Apostolical Fathers ;" he died in 1737, just as his fourth edition of that work a])peared. f It is afiirmed by the reviewer, that Jones " was never out of my bands; that my notes, my tables, and my catalogues, are all copied from Jones.'" — Very well: I admit that some of llicm werr from Jones; and that those respecting the Epistles were from Wake. Had my name been on the title-page of the Apocryphal New Testament as the editor, then, indeed, I should have assumed a sciublauce of learning personally, that 3 S4 Notwilhstandiiig so much of the Quarterly machinery is ilislocated, one part, and the most mischievous part, re- mains to be destroyed. My preface to the Apocryphal New Testament com- mences with this question: " After the writings contained in the New Testament were selected from the numerous Gospels and Epistles then in existence, what became of the books that were rejected by the compilers?" Upon this (juestion — a very natural one, as I then considered, by way of introduction to the apocryphal books now in existence — the reviewer observes, that " one object of this question is to bespeak a favourable hearing for these writings, whose authenticity, it is insinuated, was deemed worthy of consi- deration, at least, by the compilers of the New Testament." would liiivn lirni liliriilnus Tlio voiiimo is anonymous; and, tliough I iK'vcr coiifi :il((l finiti :uiy dik' who itiqniK il ( oiiccrriing tlie compiler, that J compiled it mysiK", I always mentioned the English sources of the Gospels uiu\ Epistles ; and that I drew u|) the introductory notices, aud stated the authorilirs IVom thence. IJnt it is remarkable tli;it my accuser's ol)liga- tions to Jones are more serious than mine, and ecjuully unacknowledged. Willi barely "edging: <"■ trimming of a scholar, a welt or so," lie does not quote one atitliur in a «Iead language, who was not pointed out to him by Jones ,• aud what lie says concerning English writers, ;iiiy one who lakes tlie trouble to look at tlie work on the Canon, (vol. i. pages 17, 28, 43, G5, &c.) will sec is also filclicd from Jones's volume, and that from the same source he furnislies out his six pages of rote aiiout the canon, and about Dodwell's mistaken notion that " the books comprising the present canon were con- cealed in the coflers of particular churches till the time of Trajan." 'J hronghout the whole of his article, the only original scrap is a note, which he pompously announces to liave taken from " a MS. book of an old and respectable clergyman, now before us." It might as well have been " behind us ;" for it is a story how Toland and Le Clere dilfered about a passage in Joscphtis ; how Le Cierc handed the book to Tolfind ; how Toland " owned that he did not know Greek ;" and how " Le Cierc immediately broke olf all connexion wilh him." 'J'he anonymous author of this MS, talc, sets out with " JMr. Welby (anolher clergyman) told me" the story, and ends with " Ga/e, the famous anabaptist, was|)r(sent, and gave me this account." The "old rlergy- man" forgot, when he linisiied with " Gale" as his authority, that he had liegan on tlie authority of " Mr. Welby ;" aud the reviewer could not discover that '* the old and res[iectuble clergyman" was fibbing. ;35 My answer to this is plain and short. The question itself is founded on the following- extract from Mosheim : " The opinions, or ratiicr the conjectures of the learned, concerning tlie time when the books of the New Testament were collected into one \oIume, as also about the authors of that collection, are extremely dif- fercnt. This important question is attended with great, and almost insu- perable, difficulties to us in these later times. It is, however, sufficient for us to know that, before the middle of the second century, the greate>t part of the books of tiie New Testament were read in every Christian society througliout tlie world, and received as a divine rule of faith and manners. Hence it appears, that tJieic sacred writings wete care- fully SEPARATED from Several human compositions upon the same subject, pither by some of the apostles themselves, who lived so long, or by tlieir disciples and successors, who were spread abroad througii all nations."* When I read Mosheim's statement, that " these sacred writings were carefully separated from several human compositions," I took their having- been " carefully separated" to mean that they had been " selected," and used that word. However, the reviewer affirms that an- other object of the question was " to inspire suspicion of the canonical wiitings, which, according to this account, rest for their credit on the authority of compilers of a late age, who, as fallible men, might easily mistake between canonical and spurious writings." According to what "accounts" Not to any '•'account" of mine, for I gave no "account;" the word is wholly unwarranted: all that I did was to fi*ame a question, almost in the very language ofMosheim, before quoted. Indeed, the question itself was suggested by ?»Iosheim's use of the word " question." He says, " This important question is attended with al- most insuperable difficulties." Still, so far was I from uttering or citing a syllable to " inspire suspicion of the canonical writings," that, while using the sentence in which * Moshoim's Etchs, Hist. vol. i p. 108. 36 Mosheim speak>^ of " insupera])le diiTiculties," I wholly abstained from niontioniiio- or hinting at dinicultios. To negative the reviewer's charge, I quote the following re- markable passage, of a directly opposite tendency, from my preface: "Allliongh it is uncertain wliether tlie books of the New Testament wore declared canonical by tlie Nicene Council, or by some otlicr, or when or by whom tliey were collected into a volume, it is certain (sco Table II. at the end of this workj that they were considered genuine and authentic, with a few variations of opinion as to some of them, by t!io most early Christian writers ; and that they were selected from various other Gospels and Epistles, tlic titles of which are mentioned In the works of the Fathers and tlic early historians of the Church. (See Table* I. at end.)" This passage, affirming that the books of the New Tes- tament were received as genuine and authentic by the most early Christian writers, would have been a stumbling-block to the reviewer's purpose of showing that I denied the New Testament writings ; and therefore, with consistent disho- nesty, he carefully suppresses it. But this suppression is venial, compared with an offence that the reviewer deliberately perpetrates in the subjoined paragraph. He says, " It may be right to notice a preliminary objection which has alsvays been a favourite one with the infidel, and which is revived in the preface to tiie work before ns, — namely, that they who admit the body of Cano- nical Scripture, as exhibited in the New Testament, are una!)Ic to namo the precise period at which it was received as such by the Christian cliurch, or to produce the decree of any council, in the first two centuries, which affixes its sanction either to the present or any other Canon of Scripture. As this is conceived to be a sufficient proof of the total un- certainty of the Canon, many triumphant inferences are of course deduced from it. ' The whole story,' it is insirmated, ' may be an imposture; at all events, we may not have received the true and genuine history of it; we can have no certain accounts of the doctrines promulgated by the first teachers; and, indeed, the simple fact that no formal recognition of the official documents took place, is of itself a very suspicious circumstance. 37 and quite enougli to cast an air of doubt over ]lhc whole transaction.' Wliut may be the justice of tliose inferences, a very few remarks will suflicc to demoustratcj &c." This is a master stroke. In the above paragraph, the reviewer places a sentence between inverted commas. The sentence begins on the tenth line from the top of the para- graph, with the words ' The whole story,' and ends the third line from the bottom, with the words ' the w hole transaction.' The inverted commas that he puts before the first and after the last words of this sentence, denote it to be a quotation from my preface, which he is discussing. Compare this quoted sentence with the suppressed passage, and there is a palpable discrepancy. The contradiction arises thus : — This quoted sentence, which every one who has read the Quarterly article, without referring to the Apocryphal New Testament, must infallibly believe to have been quoted by the reviewer from my preface, is not in my preface ; it is not in any part of the work ; it is not in any piece that I ever wrote or published, or sold, or read: it is an impudent forgery by the reviewer himself. By such a man, who I have shown to have wilfully per- verted the plainest facts, and to have deliberately fabricated the most palpable falsehoods ; whose article, from begin- ing to end, is a laboriously devised fraud; who stands stripped of all pretensions to honesty, and convicted of the foulest forgery; by such a man I am accused of " sottish and hopeless ignorance," " a systematic disregard of truth," " a deep and desperate malignity," and "notorious infidelity." By such a man I am called " a poor illiterate creature," and " a wretch !" He is in orders, and perhaps took ordere for abuse. He is a Divine — he may become a Christian. Like the preparer of a deadly poison, who muffles and wears a vizard, lest the subtilty of the concoction he designs for another should destroy himself, this audacious defamer, to conceal his identity and cloak his crime, uses the Quarterly F 38 for a mayk, and converts religion into a wrap-rascal. But I know him. At present he performs the prescribed formalities, in the living he was presented to upon the consummation of his crime, with the semblance of confer- ring on his parishioners the benefit of clergy ; and, when a splendid monument shall be reared to his pious memory, the reader who approaches it " will find his virtues Trimly set forth in lapidary lines; Truth with her torch beside, and little Cupids Dropping upon his tomb their marble tears." — Soullieij. I now come to a work that appeared in May, 1822, entitled " Proofs of Inspiration^ or the Ground of Distinc- tion between the New Testament and the Apocryphal Volume ; occasioned by the recent publication of the Apocryphal New Testament by Hone : by the Rev. Thomas Rennell^ B.D. F.R.S. Vicar of Kensington." There is something here not quite in good taste, not quite gen- tlemanly. If Mr. Rennell so departed from the usual course, as to introduce my name on his title-page, he might have prefixed to it the only Christian name that some, who think themselves Christians, allow me. To me, however, the omission is no discredit; nor, to me, is it of any conse- quence that in his preface he calls the criticism of the Quarterly Review " an able article." It seems that Mr. Rennell delayed his work in the expectation of an answer *' long since threatened by the Editors of the Apocryphal Volume to the article above-mentioned ;" I presume he may be almost persuaded that, though I advertised " a Refu- tation of the Quarterly Review of the Apocryphal New Testament," my abstinence from the press arose from other feelings than those of fear. I confess that I smiled 39 at Mr. Rennell's praise of an adversary, whose reputation for ability has lasted exactly two years and a quarter, merely because I maintained a sovereign contempt for his dishonesty during that period. Mr. Rennell supposes that the Apocryphal New Testa- ment is " an insidious attempt to place its w ritings upon the same foundation with the Scriptures themselves." Upon that, as a general allegation, I shall observe when I come to set forth the circumstances that occasioned the work, and my design in publishing it. Mr. Rennell's animadversions on the apocryphal Gos- pels are so mingled with animadversions on me, that from thence it must be presumed that I designed to palm these Gospels for genuine, and to represent their contents as true. His strictures altogether tend to impute to me motives and conduct that he misconceives, and misrepre- sents. To illustrate, by an instance or two. He remarks on the Gospel of Nicodemus, that, " In the latter part of it there is a poetical description of the descent into hell, and the victory of our Lord over the power of darkness, uniting, as in Mil- ton, the imagery of a classical imagination with the basis of scriptural truth." By this, and by quoting an entire chapter from the Gospel, as it stands in the Apocryphal New Testament, Mr. Rennell only does justice to it as a composition; but he says " It would be a waste of time to enlarge upon an imposture that no one has had the hardi- hood to defend. It was probably a forgery of some Chris- tian at the conclusion of the third or the beginning of the fourth century*." This infallibly persuades every reader that I contended for this gospel ; while the fact stands thus :--that in the introduction to it,Ihave distinctly stated the opinion that it was a forgery; that Jones aftinns it was a forgery ; and that he mentions the frequency of such * Mr. RcniicH's Proofs of Inspiration, p, 123. 40 forgeries. Mr. Rennell, by a single lino, might have spared his readers from eiTor, and done mc justice. Mr. Rennell, although I have mentioned my reason in the Preface, finds it difficult to account for my insertion of the Apostles' Creed. He says, " no Christian of the present day, in the Church of England at least, can believe that the very words of this creed were actually dictated by the apostles themselves." Mr. Rennell mistakes. His own Common Prayer-book, both in the morning and evening service, directs that " there shall be said or sung the Apostles' Creed by the minister and the people;" and because the Common Prayer-book calls it " the Apostles' Creed," many Christians of the Church of England not only "can," but do believe that it is the Apostles' Creed.* I included it in the Apocryphal New Testament, because it is so denominated, and because Jones himself expressly inserts it in his " List of the ApocrT/phal Books now extant."f * For positive proof of Ibis belief in our own times, see " Easter ; a Manual explanatory of terms of the Church Service in the Booh of Common Prayer;" i\ dialogue between a parishioner and a clergyman, " for the use of the licads of families, and all who are immediately under their protection." The parishioner is taught by the cicrgjmau, concerning the Apostles'" Creed, as follows:— " Parishioner. Pray inform me why the Belief which I am taught is called Ihe Apostles'" Creed. " Clergyman. It was thought requisite for the preservation of the ligiit which had been eommunicated to men to draw up a short form of vords which should comprise the principal points of christian failh : and there is a tradition generally received, that as many of the Apos- tles as had escaped persecution assembled together for that purpose; and, by each of them contributing his part, they composed a collec- tion of the chief heads of faith, relating to what Christ had taught them. It was called the Apostles'" Creed, or (agreeably to the same tradition) the Creed taught by the Apostles, because the original profession of faith, drawn up by the Apostles themselves, formed the principal portion of it." This is a cheap tract, " price 9d. or 7s. 6d. per dozen ; published by F. C. and J. Rivington, St. Paul's Church-yard, and Waterloo-place." These are Mr. RennelTsown publishers, and the tract lies on their coun- ter by the side of his own Proofs of Inspiration, f Jones, vol. i. p. 37. 41 Though my introduction to the jjlpislles of Paul and Seneca might have been longer, it could not have been more fair ; and yet, from the tenor of Mr. Rennell's stric- tures, it is to be gathered that I advocated these pieces. Had I been inclined to do so I might have elevated Seneca to a saint in the very words of another saint ; for Jerome says " Seneca I should not have ranked in my catalogue of saints, but that I was determined to it by those Epistles,*" This passage from Jerome is in the same page of Jones from whence I have adopted Jones's moderated language, and merely observed, in Jones's words, that "Jerome places Seneca, on account of these Epistles, among the ec- clesiastical and holy writers of the Christian Church." If Mr. Rennell had made the slightest representation of my impartiality, he would have found me sensible of kindness. To Mr. Rennell's remarks concerning the Acts of Paul and Thecla in the Apocryphal New Testament, I most se- riously object. My introduction to that book commences thus : " TertuUian says that this piece was forged by a Presbyter of Asia, who being convicted, confessed that he did it out of respect to Paul." Mr. Rennell takes no more notice of this sentence than if it had not existed, but acquaints his readers that " Thecla was often spoken of as a martyr by the early Fathers and historians ; and her history was so celebrated as to tempt a proselyte of Asia to forge the original of the present work. For this we have the primitive testimony of TertuUian." On this fact, on the very fact repeated by him after me, Mr. Rennell immediately observes, "After this testimony on the part of TertuUian, no one will be hardy enough to contend for the authenticity of the Acts of Paul and Thecla." His observation clearly purports that 1 was " hardy enough to contend for its authenticity" ; nay, he follows it * Jones, vol. ii. pngcCI, 42 up with language still stronger. He says, ^' We have every reason, however, to believe that many parts of the book before us were interpolated. So that the piece, as "we read it in the apocryplial volume, is an example of a double imposition," It is quite clear that, by Mr. Renncll stating from Tertullian that the piece is a forgery; by his concealing that I had made the same statement ; and by his affirming that "the piece, as we read it in the apocry- phal volume, is an example of a double imposition," conveys the idea that I had practised "imposition" by inserting it in the Apocryphal New Testament. If Mr. Rennell did not read my introduction to the Acts of Paul and Thecla, surely so to write concerning that piece as a portion of the apocryphal volume was not ingenuous; if he did read my introduction, the obliquity is increased. In the introduction to the Shepherd of Ilermas^m the Apo- cryphal New Testament I observe that " Origen thought it a most useful writing,and that it was divinely inspired." Upon this, Mr. Rennell inquires " What book of the New Testament would we receive as divinely inspired upon the testimony of a single witness ?" I would answer the ques- tion, if I had asserted that the Shepherd of Hernias, or any other book of the Apocryphal New Testament, was inspired. All that I did with regard to Hernias was to mention, on Archbishop Wake's authority, what a few early writers af- firmed of the book; and whatlhave alleged to have been said by Origen is in the archbishop's own words. Mr. Rennell, however, extracts from other parts of Origen, where that father moderates his opinion concerning this book, and adds that "these expressions are carefully kept out of sight by the editor." Can Mr. Rennell guess no other motive for my omission than an unfair one ? He quotes from the very page wherein the archbishop not merely states these moderated expressions of Origen, but actually declares that they " were put forth by that father on account of some who 43 it seems did not pay the same respect" to the Shepherd of Hennas that Origen himself did. The archbishop's disre- gard of Origen's moderated expressions was the ground of my disregard; and, strange to say, the archbishop's dis- regard of those moderated expressions is " carefully kept out of sight" by Mr. Rennell. The archbishop may have been no authority to Mr. Rennell, but surely Mr. Rennell knew that he was my sole authority. The antiquity of the Shepherd of Hermas Mr. Rennell admits to be unquestionable : he thinks that " the various moral allegories with which it abounds are highly edifying and instructive ;" and, as a specimen of the book, he quotes a whole chapter of it from the Apoc. New Test. " Let us," says Mr. Rennell, " take the following vision, which describes the trials and tribulations to come as an example ; and, to give it every possible advantage, it shall be printed in the same style with the holy scriptures, and with the same division into verses which has been effected by the pious labors of the editors of the apocryphal volume."* I understand the sneer; and, though Mr. Rennell is so candid as to state that " the various pieces which the Apocryphal New Testament contains have been often print- ed, both in their original language and in translations,"f I imagine it may be information to him, that a translation of the Shepherd of Hermas, made a hundred and sixty years ago, by John Pringle, is divided into verses ; the book is in my hand, and I place the title of it in a note below. X * Mr. Rcnnell's Proofs; p. 77. t II>iJ« P- i. Introd. X The title of I'ringle's Shc|)Iierd of Hermas runs tlins : — "The Three Books of Hermas the Biseipic of Paul the Apostle, viz. I. The Church. II. Tlie Shepherd. Hf. The Similitudes. Englished by John Pruis:le. London : Printed for John White, in Threailneedle Street, behindc the Old Exchange, 1661," small 8vo. pp. 190. The following arc titles of other apocryphal pieces in my possession: 1. ^'' The First Bvok of the Gospel of is'kodemus ; translated from the 44 That the division of apocryphal pieces into vci*ses is not an invention of mine, must be well known to Mr. llennell, for he expressly mentions the " Apocrypha to the Old Testament," which is also " printed in the same style with the holy scripture, and with the same division of verses "» ori|;inal Hebrew. Printed and sold in London," wKiiout dale, hut ai)i)arcntly about Qncen Anne's time ; on coarse paper, one sheet, I2ino. on the title a woodcut portrait. On comparing this with a IMS. copy, tliat 1 have, of the early translation of •' Nicho- €lc7nns his Gospel," printed by Jolni Caustericr, witiiout date, it appears to be the first seven chapters of that translation, vvitli slight alterations modernising the phraseology. This common hawker's edition of Nicodenms, which probably sold for a half- penny, is divided into eight chapters, and subdivided into verses. 2. " ^icodemns's Gospel. Containing an extraordinary and minute Accoinit of our blessed Saviour's Trial and Accusation ; his Death and Passion; his Descent into the Invisible World; and what happened there during that period : with his Ascension into Hea- ven. \A^hieii curious relation will be found agreeable to Scripture. Jiy Josep/i IVilson. London: I'rintcd for the Author; and sold at Lis House in Lancaster Court, in the Strand, 1767.'' 8vo. with a Preface, pp.78. This edition, also after Causterier's, is, like his, divided into thirteen cUupters, and Wilson subdivides it into verses. 3. T/ie Epistle of Paul to the Laodiceans, a Translation into Welch, (at the end of the "Testament y deuddeg Patriarch, sef Meibion Jacob. A Gyfieilhwyd allan or Groeg gan Robert Grosthead J'lsgoi) Lincoln. Argraphwyd jii y Mwythig, 1719," r2mo.) is divided into verses, witli this addition, after the last verse — "Episll I'aid at y Laodieeaid a garfwyd yn y BibI hynafary Breintwyd yn Worms." The Epistle to the Laodiceans in Jones on the Canon is also divided into verses ; but Jones's work was not published until seven years after the Epistle in the Welsh Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs. *In 1820, and before the Apocryphal New Testament appeared in that year, the Rev. Richard Laurence, LL.D. Regius Professor of Hebrew, Canon of Christ Chureii, &,c. ami now Archbishop of Cashel, publishetl llie Apocryplial I'irst Rook of Ezra \\\ Ethiopic, wifh a Latin and t]nglisli translation. 'J'hc archbishop had published in 1819 the Apocryphal Rook of The Ascension of Isaiah the Prophet, also in Ethiopic, with similar translations. In 1821, alter the publieatiiju of the second edition of the Apocrvphal New 'J'estanienf, the archbishop produced an English trans- lation of the Apocryphal Booh of Enoch the Prophet. These three apo- rrypiial books were printed at theOxford university press, and arc divided into chapters and verses. 4/5 I have remarked elsewhere* that " The Gospels included in the Apocryphal New Testament, rank with such pieces in the Old Testament Apocrypha as the book of Tobit - wherein it is related that his son married the widow of seven husbands, all of whom were slain on the nuptial night by a devil that was in love with her; but who was himself finally discomfited by the eighth bridegroom fumigating the wedding chamber with the burning heart and liver of a fish; the which smell when the evil spirit hadsmelled, hejled into the utmost parts of Eg2/pt."f " The angel so conspicuous in Tobit is guilty of a gross lie, saying, first, that he was Azarias the son of Ananias,:J: and afterwards^ that he was Raphael, one of the seven angels."l| This, and the won- derful history of Bel and the Dragon, with the delectable and instructive story of Susannah and the Elders, so often • At tlie end of Ancient Mysteries Desaibed, t Tobit, viii. 3. : Ibid. V. 13. § Ibid. xii. 15. II Jones, vol. i. p. 10. Fobit lias been a great favorite witb the multitude. There is in the Uritisii Museum a black-letter garland jbearing tliis title : " A Pleasant liallad of Tobias, wherein is shewed what wonderful things chanced to liim in his Youth ; and how he wedded a young Damoscll that had Seven Husbands, but never enjoyed their Company, being all Slain by an Evil Spirit. To a pleasant neto Tune." A sheet with woodcuts. How the dog in Tobit came to be popular is not easily explained. The animal is only mentioned once on the departure of the Angel and Tobias for their journey to Media. The host in St. Paul's Church-yard, who, by having Tobifs Dog for a sign, outrivals the fame of him of the Goose and Gridiron, should thankfully receive the information that the apocry- phal dog was Tobias's. — So theij both went forth, and the young man's dog with them. (Tobi(, v. 16.) This going forth was just utter the angel bad cheated Tobit with a lie. The Hystory of Thobye, in the Golden Legend, states that after the fish was caught and roasted. They " toke it with them for to ete by the •waye, and the remenaut they salted, that it might suffyse them tyl they came in to the cyte of Rages." A good specimen of Count Goudt's peculiar style of execution is his print after Elsiieiiiier of the Journeying with the Fish across a stream. Uut the most sumptuous illustration of this apocryphal book is Raphael's ^)icture of Our Lady of the Fish, in which are thcVirgin, the Infant Jesus, St. Jerome, the Archangel, and Tobias with his Fish. These were insisted on by the nuns for whom it was painted, and render this splcndi production a remarkable instance of anachronism, 46 illustrated by prurient painters, are appointed as morning and evening- lessons, which, according to the thirty- nine articles, with the other apocryphal " books, as Jerome saith, the church doth read for example of life and instruc- tion of manners:" Mr. Rennell terms these pieces " useful and pious books ;" I must be excused for dissenting from his denomination, and for Avondering, with others, "that such stories as Bel and the Dragon should be read in the church."* Jones terms the " useful and pious books" of Mr. Rennell '' idle fables of the Apocrypha of the Old Testament ;"f and yet I am called to account for adopting " the same division into verses which has been effected by the pious labours of the editors of" ^/«a^ Apocrypha. For the double-lined rule enclosing the title to the Apocryphal New Testament, a precedent may be found in Archbishop Wake's title-page to his own editions of " the Genuine Epistles of the Apostolical Fathers," which being so distinguished suggested to me the idea. The Epistles in the archbishop's volume, and the form of his title-page, I adopted together, t Other strictures of Mr. Rennell have been answered by preceding remarks on the Quarterly reviewer, or will be by what follows. This observation equally applies to several of the objections in another publication, which appeared soon after Mr. Rennell's, viz. " The Genuine and Apocrj/phal Gospels compared. A Charge delivered to the Clergy of the Archdeaconry of Derby, at the Visitations at Derby and Chesterfield, June 6 and 7, 1822, and published at their request. By Samuel Butler, D.D. F.R.S. and S.A. &c. Archdeacon oj Berhrj, and Head-master of Shrewsbury School." I think that ■ "Kallerfelto, with Iiis hair on end, At his own wonders, wond'ring for his bread/ * Bishop Cosin on om his oion represen- tation, that I could not have read Fabricius ; and, hence, I re- marked * such reviewers as mine should have good memories: Fabricius stated the fact for me ■' Not upon the reviewer's showing, but upon my own declaration, I hope it will be -believed, that 1 had not read that author: Fabricus is in Latin, and I am not ashamed to own that I cannot read hina/ But the reviewer, contemning the inconsistency I imputed to him, says, ' The pamphleteer, imagining that Fabricius is an original work accuses us here of inconsistency, 'in saying that he had read it, and yet that he had not recourse to any original source of information !* Stay, stay ; the words in his article on the Apocryphal New Testament do not end so. In that there is the conjunction * and/ after the word * in- formation :' his passage runs thus, ' zmthout having consulted one original saurce of information, and deriving even his slender knowledge o/" Collectors at second hand* So that the coaxing note of admiration (!) at the word * information^ in \{\s present article, was a full stop upon Xhe further 'infor- mation,' which he had presented his readers with, in his former article, namely, that I had derived even my * slender knowledge of CoijhECTORS at second hand!' His ' inconsistency' is fixed upon him by the latter words ; and his concealment that he had used them, is a disgraceful artifice to escape from the charge. I will not lay down my pen till I have shown, that every point of his attack, or defence, throughout his present article, is at least equally fraudulent. It may be remembered, that in < Aspersions Answered,' particular mention is made of three letters ; one, purporting to be from the Bishops Chromatins and Heliodorus, to Jerome, with a request that he would translate the Gospel of Mary; and the other two, purporting to be from him to them, assent- 9 ing to their request. The reviewer of the Apocryphal New Testament said these letters were declared forgeries by several learned men, and that I could not be ignorant that they were forgeries, because * Jones himself, whose book was never out of the editor's (my) hands, subscribes to the expressions of these eminent writers.' In answer to this, 1 said < Jones does not subscribe to their expressions. Jones says, " Perhaps those epistles may be supposititious ;" but, for the opinion that they are, he instantly declares, " I am not able yet to see that clear evidence which the writers last mentioned pretend." Is this subscribing to their expressions ?' Having put that ques- tion, 1 proceeded to observe, that Jones expressed his * dis- sent' in words so marked and unequivocal, that the reviewer could not mistake it for subscription ; but subscription suiting the reviewer's purpose better than dissent, he preferred the fraud to the truth.' The reviewer is mightily shocked at such a remark from a * poor illiterate creature,' upon whom he had poured his virulence like water, and whom he had called a ' wretch !' * We are amazed at the audacity !' No, he was not; I had proved his fraud, and he should have written — zee were panic-struck at the detection! * He ventures in the most outrageous terms to revile us,' What a daring offence to * our' critical majesty ! ' However, we are well assured,' says the reviewer, * that, as far as we are concerned, no defence can be necessary ! ' Very stately, but untrue : because he actually goes into a ' defence,' and, in exculpation, quotes this passage from Jones (vol. ii. p. 132), ' I know, indeed, that learned men have generally agreed to reject these epistles as not being Jerome's : thus Sixtus Senensis, Coke, Rivet, Cave, and others of this sort of writers, to zohom \v I should in this point subscribe ; yet, as I dare venture to say, the letters are very ancient, so it is not likely that the author of them would venture on a forgery of such a fact in which every one would be able to confute him.' It is the reviewer's opinion, that ' both' before I published the Apocryphal New Testament, 10 and before my pamphlet, 1 must have seen this passage in Jones ' a thousand times.' How many times I saw it I do not remember, and I will not quarrel with him about two oi- three cyphers in the number, but I saw it ; and what is its purport? In Jones's passage, the clause, * to whom if I should in this point subscribe,' is hypothetical — an admission for the sake of the argument : it is no more, although the reviewer chooses to pervert Jones's dubious * if I should subscribe' into ' an express declaration' that he did subscribe. The re- viewer says, * having found an express declaration from that writer (Jones) on the point, zee certainly did not suspect that in another part of the work, not connected with the gospel of Mary, he varied somewhat from his former opinion.' The passage wherein he affirms Jones to have * varied somewhat,' is that which I adduced against the reviewer thus, 'Jones says, *' perhaps those Epistles may be supposititious," but, for the opinion that they are, he instantly declares " I am not able yet to see that clear evidence which the writers last mentioned pretend."' Then Jones immediately refers to who these * writers last mentioned' were; he says ' see Obs. IV.' and his *Obs. IV.' is the very passage with the ' if now cited by the reviewer as ' an express declaration' that Jones subscribes to the opinions of those writers.' Aye! but * we did not suspect that in another part of the work, not connected with the gospel of Mary, he varied somezDhat from his former opinion.' This is mere prevarication ; for so far from having * varied some- what' from the former passage, Jones actually recognizes the very doubt in it, that his * if expressed, by saying * I am not able yet to see that clear evidence which the last mentioned writers pretend.' What words can express his meaning more plainly ? Suppose, however, that he really had ' varied some- what,' which I deny, and that this variation were to be found * in another part of the work 7iot connected with the gospel of Mary.' What then ? The passage which the reviewer pre- tends to have ' varied somewhat,' is only eleven pages beyond 11 the former passage ; and, though he unblushmgly impresses it on his readers, that it is in a part * not connected zvith the gospel of Mary, ^ yet it is in a chapter which Jones (vol. ii. p. ]43.) especially denotes an inquiry concerning the author of * the Gospel of Mary,' and in the very midst of his disserta- tio7is upon that gospel. Having, in my former pamphlet, proved the falsehood of the reviewer's declaration, that Jones subscribed to the opinions of previous writers respecting these alleged forgeries, I have here re-proved it. I have likewise proved that the reviewer's attempted exculpation is further inculpation, and that he aggravates his first offence by the crime, and effrontery, of further fraud. Some eighteen years ago, I heard a member in the House of Commons deliver a long speech, with much arithmetical detail, to show an error of several millions in some accounts upon the table; but a short counter-speech, of a plain state- ment or two, convinced the house, and the honourable member, that himself was in error : nothing discomfited, however, he arose once more, and affirmed that he could not make his opponent's figures right by some few thousands, though he had i cast them up ;' the reply he received, amidst laughter on one side, and holding down of heads on the other, was, ' Perhaps the honourable member had better cast them down^ The anecdote illustrates the reviewer's conduct respecting the gospel of Mary ; a book, concerning which, in connection with Jones's name, I clearly demonstrated he had ignorantly misconceived, and fraudulently misrepresented so much, that his revertal to it bespeaks insanity. He persists, however, in pretending to believe that the present gospel of Mary is not the ancient Apocryphal gospel under that name, but a forgery of it. With his belief, however, 1 have nothing to do, but he chooses, still, to force upon his readers, that Jones declares it to be a forgery I am perfectly aware of the sort of person I have to deal with, and therefore, setting him aside altogether, I desire to inform l)is readers, that, in answer to the foulest charges of dishonesty 12 urged against me by the reviewer, concerning that gospel, 1 incontestably proved, that Jones did not treat it as a forgery of the old gospel, but as that gospel itself ' still extant;* that he excluded it from his discussions and collections respecting the books not extant ; that, incidentally mentioning it while treating of the non-extant books, he said he should not there inquire concerning it, because it was a book still extant 5 and that, ac- cordingly, he placed it in that division of his work which con- tained extant Apocryphal books alone. In answer to facts so palpably against him, but, artfully taking the utmost care not to mention one of them, the reviewer cites a passage, wherein Jones states that * the ancient and present copies are not the same, which is evident from the manifest contradictions between them.' In this cited passage Jones means literally what he so says, and no more; namely, that the ' copies are not the same-' It is altogether a question of copies. On the discre- pancies incident to manuscripts, this is not the place, nor indeed is there a necessity for enlarging ; and therefore, refer- ring to my former pamphlet, for a satisfactory repl^ to the fatuitous stuff the reviewer brings forward in the shape of answer to what I there said, regarding the gospel of Mary, I have only to repeat my surprize that such a man should have courted my further notice of him ; and especially as regards that book. Haifa page, a whole half-page of the Quarterly, is occupied in wailing and reproach for my treatment of J erome, who, it seems, is henceforth to have 'his usual title' and be ' St. Jerome/ The reviewer is quite pettishbecause I wrote what he calls * vul- garity against St. Jerome.' I believe I did Jerome no injus- tice ; nor does the reviewer deny the saint's ill odour, though he is angry that I conceived offence at it. But why did he thrust his tainted father before me ? The reviewer admires his * ac- knowledged purity and beauty of style,' and, without doubt, his loguery too; but, as I have been accustomed to conceive dis- honesty an emasculation of talent> it is not wonderful that I 13 should estimate Jerome, with his splendid genius, little higher than a stale fish in the dark. My adversary is right when he alleges that ' St. Jerome was, according to my account, capable of bad actions.' I certainly think he was ; for he was guilty of them : and though the reviewer thought it wise to conceal, yet he was enabled to add, from my references, that Daille, Dupin, Jortin, and Dean Milner, furnished me with the particulars that make up ' my account' of this saint's peccability. < But this sagacious pamphleteer/ says my adver- sary, * from internal consciousness we presume of the fact, concludes that a bad man must be a weak one.' Giving the reviewer's abuse, because it is no discredit to me, I answer that I did not so assert in my pamphlet ; but, that, notwith- standing it may double his sneer at my ' sagacity,' and, however, from self-deception, he may imagine the contrary, I think every ' bad man is a weak one.' I assigned my reasons for affirming of Jerome, that he was capable of translating the spurious gospel of Mary, and garbling it in the translation ; and the re- viewer is, of all men, the least qualified, to induce a change in that or any other opinion I entertain. His next charge is, * The pamphleteer pleads guilty to the next piece of dishonesty, of which we accused the editor of the Apocryphal New Testament.' He ,of course publishes my confession and contrition for the offence, in my own lan- guage. No : not a syllable ! a forbearance which a plain fact iiistantly accounts for — his assertion is false. His misrepre- sentation alludes to my having presumed that several expres- sions of the ancient fathers indicated that the Protevangelion of James had obtained a very general credit in tiie Christian world. How this arose is fully explained in my pamphlet, (p. 31, and 32), from which explanation the reviewer has not dared to quote a single word, inasmuch as the citation of any one sentence would have been fatal to his base perversion of my statements. When reviewing the Apocryphal New Testament he piled 14 fraud on fraud, till lie did not dare to hazard another, and then affecting sudden horror at the book before him, he exclaimed, * To penetrate deeper into the dark recesses of its falsehoods, is a task, which we cannot inflict on ourselves/ In rebuking this shameless trick, I said, (Asp. Ans. p. 33.) * the reviewer artfully conceals, that two-ihirds of the Apocryphal New Tes- tament are occupied by these pieces, (the Epistles of Clement, Barnabas, Ignatius, and Polycarp, and the Shepherd of Her- nias), all of them translated and published by Wake, Arch- bishop of Canterbury, under the title of " the Genuine Epis- tles of the Apostolical Fathers.'" Most carefully shunning all quotation, he chooses to misrepresent what I said, in these words. ' The pamphleteer now declares, that bei/ond the part which we exposed, there remain only (p. 33), the Epistles published by Wake, and he accuses us of artfully concealing this fact, and thus trying to represent the last part of his book as equally noxious with the first, while in fact it only con- tained what had been already published by an Archbishop !' Having thus counterfeited my charge, that he had concealed that * two thirds of the Apocryphal New Testament were occu- pied by Wake's Epistles,' into my having declared that,* beyond the parts' which he had examined, * there remain only the Epistles,' he next proceeds to show that the volume con- tained some other pieces, and that, consequently, according to such a showing, I had falsified. At last, to make the trick pass, he slights, and calmly asks, * Is this poor creature in his senses r' I forbear from comment. Perhaps the reader is quite as wearied by the develop- ment of these impostures as I am, and, therefore, for the re- viewer's six Hues on my words, * I took " careful separation," to mean " selection,"' which he terms * elegant phraseology ;' and, for his seven lines, declining to prove that ' the word question may be used instead of account, because to talk to the pamphleteer would be to talk to an idiot;' for these thirteen lints I refer to the Quarterly itself; and. 15 for the refutation of their purpose, to the passages in the pamphlet they profess to answer. I clear away thus, in order to get immediately at the reverend reviewer's defence to the charge I brought against him of Forgery. It appears that the word 'Forgery,' is distasteful to him. It was the word I used, but he carefully avoids it for a more ' elegant phraseology' which runs thus. * The pamphleteer, accuses us of quoting from his preface words not in it.' Ex- actly so: and, that the matter may be clearly understood, the paragraph of the Quarterly article on the Apocryphal New Testament, which contains the Forgery is subjoined. Extract from the Quarterly Review, Vol. xxv. p. Slg. " It may be right to notice a preliminary objection which has always been a favourite one with the infidel, and which is revived in the preface to the work before us — namely, that they^who admit the body of Cano- nical Scripture, as exhibited in the New Testament, are unable to name the precise period at which it was received as such by the Christian church, or to produce the decree of any council, in the first two centuries, which affixes its sanction either to the present or any other Canon of Scripture. As this is conceived to be a suflicient proof of the total un- certainty of the Canon, many triumphantinferences are of course deduced from it. * The whole story,' it is insinuated, ' may be an inaposture ; at all events we may not have received the true and genuine history of it; we can have no certain accounts of the doctrines promulgated by the first teachers; and, indeed, the simple fact that no formal recognition of tlic official documents took place, is of itself a very suspicious circumstance and quite enough to cast an air of doubt over the whole transaction.' What may be the justice of these inferences a very few remarks will suffice to demonstrate, &c." After I had inserted the preceding Extract from the Quar- terly, (in Asp. Ans. p. 36.) I remarked thus : — * This is a master stroke. In the above paragraph, the reviewer places a sentence between inverted commas. The sentence begins on the tenth line from the top of the paragraph, with the words ' the whole story,' and ends the third line from the bottom, with the words ' the whole transaction.' The inverted com- 16 mas that he puts before the first and after the last words of this sentence, denote it to be a quotation from my preface, which he is discussing. This quoted sentence, which every one who has read the Quarterly article, without referring to the Apocryphal New Testament, must infallibly believe to have been quoted by the reviewer from my preface, is not in my preface ; it is not in any part of the work ; it is not in any piece that I ever wrote or published, or sold, or read ; it is an impudent Forgery by the reviewer himself.' This was my charge, from which the reviewer defends himself with his usual fraud. Like the soldier under punishment at the halberds, who complained that every stroke, whether above, beneath, or in the middle, was either too high or too low, there is no pleasing him. He complains that I urge this charge * out of order.' ' He found,' says my uneasy adversary, * that the most convenient order, with respect to this charge, was to place it at the end of his defence, after examining many passages, in which we had quoted his words ; and thus to induce his readers to suppose that we might have wished to appear to do so in the part in question ;' and, he goes on to say, this was ' an artifice to conceal that theexiract was made from the commencement of our Jrticle, in which we are not occupied with the Apocryphal l^ew Testament at all V My adversary's stand * upon the order,' is a shuffle. I took his points in their natural course : tracing each thread through the sinuo- sities of its entanglement, and drawing them out one by one, I took the Forgery last, because, being the strongest in the snarl he handed to me, it was the fittest for tying up the skein — it was a climax. Whether ' the extract was made from the commencement of our Article, in which we are not occupied with the Apocryphal Nezc Testament at all /' we shall see in the se- quel. But, it is here requisite to set forth what, I suppose, is to be taken as his explanation, which deserves marked attention. He says, ' Before taking the slightest notice of Mr. Ho?ie's publica- tion, or even alluding to its general character, we gave a detailed 17 account in five or six pages of the several infidel objections to tlie canon of the New Testament ; and pointed ont the method in which they were brought forward, and in which the argu- ments founded on them were stated. We incidentally no- ticed also, that one of them was revived in the preface to the Apocryphal New Testament. We then explained what the nature of it was, and proceeded to state it thus: ' " The whole story," it is insinuated, " may be an imposture, &c.'* The pamphleteer attempts to say that we quoted these words as hts. It will, we think, hardly he credited that WE do not commence our notice of the Apocryphal New Testament for several passages after this passage.' I just remark the * elegant phraseology' of the conclusion, and pro- pose this question — Pray if the quoted sentence contained, as the reviewer alleges, ' an infidel objection revived in my pre- face,' did not its having been mentioned by him, and quoted by him, as that 'infidel objection revived in my preface,' purport that it contained the words of my preface ? Inverted commas are always used and taken to denote, that the words, before and after which they are placed, were uttered by some person, or written or printed in some manuscript, or book. This being so, then it is clear, that the words quoted by the reviewer, pur- port and denote that they were quoted by him from my preface. I here re-affirm they are not in my preface, and that the quoted sentence * is an impudent Forgery by the reviewer himself.' But it seems the 'incidental mention o( my preface,' which in- troduced the quotation, and fixed the purport of it, as a quotation from my preface— it seems that this is to go for nothing ; be^ cause, in the first place, ray extract from the reviewer's article, was made from the commencement of his article, in which he was *not occupied with the Apocryphal New Testament at all;' it seems, in the second place, that * before taking the slightest notice, or even alluding to its general character,' there were five or six pages of detail, one of which pages contained the quoted passage; and finally, it seems, in the third place, and 'it will D 18 hardly Ve credited,' says The reviewer, that * we do not com- mence our notice of the book for several pages after this passage!' Alas! these laboured repnSsentations of a single fact, labour under a distressing calamity that befalls all his repre- sentations — they are not true ! The fact itself is false ! This mortifying inconvenience arises out of the accident, that the very Jii'st jmragraph of the reviewer's article on the Apocry- phal New Testament declares, that it is 'a work of which the sole aim is to destroy the credit of the New Testament! and to show that the most silly and drivelling forgeries can be sup- ported by the same evidence which we use to establish the authority of scripture !' This is something more than the ' slightest notice' of this book!; rather more than not 'even alluding to its general character!;' and it is taken so nearly 'irom the commencement of our article, in which we are not occupied with the Apocryphal New Testament at all !,' that, ' it will hardly be credited,' it commences on the twelfth line, from the first line of the beginning of ' our' article '. This then ends the reviewer's defence as to the charge of Forgery. One more helplessly weak, or flagrantly false, never drivelled from the idiocy of guilt, under the anticipation of suffering, and the desire to escape from it. Further it wer^ unnecessary to go, for any purpose of ex- emplifying the reviewer's flagitiousness ; for I have hitherto taken and destroyed each of his points, as I came up to it, in the order of its occurrence, and forced his lines in every direc- tion. I cannot, however, decline one remaining position, with- out the possibility of its being alleged, that he had succeeded at one point : this must not be : he has compelled me to the field and I shall clear it. ' We have gone,' he says, ' through the pamphleteer's text, and shall now examine his notes.' Indulging his usual pro. pensities, by dissociating my exposition of his un-tyro-like blunder, respecting the Codex of Fabricus, from the Faustus case, (whereon he observes afterwards, and I shall observe 19 presently, in connection with the Codex case) he proceeds to say, ' The last of this wretched man's follies that we shall notice, arises from an obvious, but trifling error of the press. We gave in a note, a very curious instance of Toland's igno- rance (of Greek) on the authority of a MS book of an old and respectable clergyman, who received it from another clergy- man, Mr. Welby, and 'Mr. Welby from an ear-witness, Gale, the Anabaptist. By an error of the press, the mark of quotation (') is omitted, &.c.' Referring the reader to the Quarterly (vol. xxv. p. 353,) and to Asp. Arts. p. 34, I merely observe, that, in alarm for the ' old and respectable clergyman' who, in consequence of the absurd misrepre- sentation of the unauthenticated anecdote I said ' was fibbing,' the reviewer endeavours to maintain the old gentleman's cre- dibility by saying that the printer omitted a ' mark of quotation,' and he forms one on the page thus (') — in compliment to his readers. Yet, it so happens, that there is ' a mark of quotation' at the beginning, and another at the end of the stori/ ! and where- ever the reverend reviewer may interpolate another, or other marks of quotation, or however he may transpose the present marks of quotation, or either of them, the contradiction in his < very curious instance of Toland's ignorance,' will, notwith- standing such a method, remain perversely incurable at the foot of page 353, in vol. xxv. of the Quarterly Review, so long as that page vexatiously retains the impression of the printer's ink. Hence, if the anonymous ' old and respectable clergyman' was not ' fibbing,' the present ' fibbing' of the anonymous young clergyman, who is my reviewer, has left the reputation of his venerable authority just as it was, and that, without even establishing * Toland's ignorance' of Greek. I wish to inspect the * manuscript of the old and respectable clergyman.' If it is in a public collection I shall be glad of a reference to it. If it is in his oSvn possession, or, if he even 'pen from lenders' books,' it is within his control, and can be 20 safely intrusted to the care of Mr. Murray for a single day. I crave oyer of this manuscript. Though he affirmed that my relation of the tale of the manuscript was * the last of the wretched man's follies' that he should notice ; yet, forgetful of this prudent determination, he immediately resumes his critical labours, and begins his next paragraph thus : — ' When we accuse him of saying that several Christian sects received a writing as genuine though only two, the Gnostics and Manichseans, infamous for their forgeries and corruptions of scripture, could be adduced, he sinks the character of the sects, and covers his falsehoods by saying that the Gnostics were divided into many different pm'ties V The reviewer uniformly puts a note of admiration to each of his wilful misre- presentations, and, therefore, there is one at the end of this. He had affirmed in the article on the Apocryphal New Testament that when I said several ancient Christian sects received the Gospel of Mary, it was a falsehood ; for I had mentioned only two—* they dwindled down to two — the Gnostics and Ma- nichaeans.' To this I answered, that ' there were upwards of fifty different sects' classed under one general denomination of Gnostics ; and I referred him to Mosheim for a fact which he was either ignorant of, or fraudulently concealed. Jones and Lardner show the same, and the answer surely was conclusive against his representation, that my expression was inaccurate. In the apocryphal article he quotes Epiphanius, viz. 'Epi- phanius, H(jPres Ixxviii- §.7.,' and, unless Gibbon lies, Epipha- nius, in that very book, had he read it, as well as referred to it, must have presented him with the list of ' the fifty different sects of Gnostics.' Which of tiiese sects does the reviewer class with — for he assumes to be a Gnostic ^ As he sagely prefers to revive this subject, and by repeat- ing his former words, once more declares the ' Gnostics and Machinaans infamous for their forgeries and corruptions of 21 scripture;' let me now remark, that grossly ignorant as he was, respecting the various sects of Gnostics, his ignorance is equally gross respecting the Manichaans. They were not ' infamous for their forgeries and corruptions of scripture.' Lardner expressly afSrms that the Machinseans were neither guilty of * forging' nor of ' corrupting' scripture, and he cites Augustine, with whom as well as Epiphanius the reviewer pretends great acquaintance in his Apocryphal article, as ex- pressly acquitting them of such frauds ! The reviewer sneeringly inquires whether * there is otie human being to whom Mr, Hone's ignorance or knowledge can give either pleasure or pain V Perhaps, yes — * one.' * When we accuse him,' says the reviewer, * of stealing one half of his book from Jones, without intimating the existence of that writer's work, he says, that he never denied the fact to personal inquirers P The reviewer says in his inexplicable expla- nation respecting the old Clergyman's MS. that a * trifling in- stance of candour' on my part would have rendered that explanation unnecessary. May I presume that I am to receive his statement, on the present topic, as a retaliation for an offence of which his own obscurity, or something Vvorse, ren- dered it impossible I could be guilty ? His ' candour' may be deduced from his omitting to give a single line, of what I stated, in answer to his charge of borrowing from Jones without acknowledgment. On that occasion I observed thus : — ' Had my name been ou the title page of the Apocryphal New Test- ament as the editor, then, indeed, I should have assumed a semblance of learning personally that would have been ridiculous. The volume is anonymous ; and though / never concealed from any one who inquired con- cerning the compiler, that I co?npiled it myself, I always mentioned the English sources of the Gospels and Epistles ; and that I drew up tbe intro- ductory notices, and stated the authorities from thence. But it is remarkable that my accuser's obligations to Jones are more serious than mine, ancZ equally unacknowledged. With barely "the edging or trimming of a scholar, a welt or so ;" he (the reviewer) does not quote one AUTHOR IN A DEAD LANGUAGE who was nol poinled out to him by Janes; 22 and what he says concerning English writers, any one who takes the trouble to look at the work on the Canon (vol. i. pages 17, 28, 43, 65, &c.) will see is also picked J'rom Jones's volumes, and that, Jrom the same sottrce hej'urnishes out his six pages of rote about the canon, ^c' I re-state thus much in vindication of myself: and how has the reviewer answered it ? Not by denying a single word of what I alleged as to his own obligations to Jones, which I could prove to the minutest atom ; nor by denying that I also alleged the only scrap in his article underived from Jones's references or text, which he pilfered without mercy and without reading, was the Jibbing ' anecdote from the manuscript book.' Not a word of this does he condescend upon ; but, on the contrary, he has the vanity to imagine that these lines of im- pertinent misrepresentation may be taken for a true account of what I said in my own vindication ; and he seems to think the best answer he could give, to the irrefutable charge against himself, was a note of admiration ! Notes of admiration are marvellously insinuating, and the reviewer insults the readers of the Quarterly by their constant use whenever he commits a fraud upon them. He puts one at the end of a fallacious state- ment, regarding my explanation of the reference to the Apocry- phal Gospel of Nicodemus for apocryphal particulars of the Descent into Hell. He is quite welcome to any ascendancy he can attain by the trick with minds of a certain order ; it will not, however, avail him with one discriminating reader, who compares what he and I have written. Again ' Faustus is our friend !' The reverend and learned reviewer makes the last sally of his militancy with his old ally, the Manichasan, and throws his * supreme ignorance' at me, as, * above all,' most effectual. ' And above all,' says my ex- hausted adversary, * when we convict him of mistaking the no- torious Faustus, the Maiiichjean, for a Provencal bishop ; and in the plenitude of his own ignorance bestowing commen- dations on the learning of a person remarkable for the want of it, and of whom he now confesses he knew so little as to be 23 compelled, as we guessed, to refer to a common Biographical Dictionary ; he replies, that this is no error in divi7iity, but in ecclesiastical history !' Another note of admiration denoting, as usual, another malversation. I will explain this. The reviewer had inquired, <■ Is there a single reader of divinity, so utterly ignorant of the commonest facts as not to be aware that Faustus was an African, a teacher of the Machinjean heresy at Carthage ?' To that question I answered, ' Yes, thou- sands of readers oi divinity ; for this is not a fact in divinity, but a fact in ecclesiastical history ; which, I take permission to believe, is as different from divinity, as Faustus the Mani- chasan is different from Faustus the Bishop.' My answer, therefore, was to shew, that, while he was stating that I had misrepresented a bishop of Provence, for a Manichzean of Carthage, he himself, by the very language he used for that purpose, was misrepresenting divinity for ecclesiastical history. To retaliate on me now, for that mal-apropos ex- posure of his own blimder then, it is ' hey ! presto ! beo-one ! ' with his blunder : he conceals that from his readers altoo-ether: and conjuring upon them my reply to his blunder, as a reply to his charge, an admired note of self-admiration completes the trick, and denotes the juggle. There are several cases of this sort ' in the books,' especially in the Newgate Calendar, with the names of the perpetrators, and how they were disposed of. My mistake as to Faustus I at once admitted. Its ludi- crousness excited no one's risibility more than my own. Perhaps it was no palliation, that I paralleled with it the reviewer's mistake as to divinity ; or, that I instanced, on the authority of Jones and Lempriere, that Jerome and Cornelius Nepos had blundered in much the same way : such acci- dental errors are detectable even in Cicero, and many of the authors of ancient times ; to say nothing of later writers, and some who ' flourish' in our own. Moreover, as a farther set-off against Faustus, I pointed out another maculation in the reviewer. Instead of the « Codex Jpocryphus,' a collection 24 of tlie Ne?KJ Testament Apocrypha by Fabricius in 1703, he had quoted the ,' Codex Pseiidepigraphus,' a collection of Old Testament Apocrypha, published by Fabricius, in 17 13; on which I remarked, that as ' I. mistook the later Faustus for the earlier Faustus, the reviewer mistook the later Codex for the earlier Codex,' and that this brought us in juxta-position. He defends himself from this, by a ' curious ' story. ' By some accident,' says the * veracious' reviewer very gravely, ' our copy of the first work is lettered Codex Pseudepigraphus Novi Testament! ; and we freely confess that we erred as to the title ; but not,' continues the respectable reviewer, * as to the work itself; for, all through our article, zee cite this book with a specific reference to volume and page, under the same title of Codex Pseudepigraphus.' According to this statement, I, also, must * freely confess,' that any other person may fall into the same error as the reviewer, provided that he have the reviewer's copy of the book with the ' accident' on the back ; provided, too, that, like the reviewer, he refer to the binder's lettering-piece for the title instead of the title-page ; and pro- vided further, that, also like the reviewer, he be so unacquainted with the Codex Apocryphus and the Codex Pseudepigraphus as not to know they are different works : — all this being pre- mised, any other person, under these circumstances of the re- viewer, may go on quoting the Codex Apocryphus ^ all through an article, with a specific reference to volume and page, under the title of Codex Pseudepigraphus.' It is evident that the re- viewer was as ignorant that theie were two codices, by Fabri- cius, till my detection of his blunder gave him the information, as I was ignorant that there were two persons named Faustus, till his detection of mt/ blunder gave me that information. It is as impossible, that the reviewer, with a competent know- ledge of the existence and contents of the two codices could have quoted the title of the Old Testament Codex, instead of the title of the I^ew Testament Codex, ' all through an article ;' as I, had I knowD of the existence of the two Faustuses, could 25 have mistaken the Manichoean for the bishop. Yet, bedause I nientioned Faustus, with the single word ' learned' prefixed to his name, the reviewer chooses to falsify that prefixion, into the * bestowing com/wewc?«(f?ons ON the learning of a person remarkable for the want of it ;' and he urges this fraud ful dilation, while he himself is actually engaged in proving, that I had mistaken this person for another, whose learning entitled him to the epithet, and to whom I directed that epithet; and not, as the reviewer maliciously counterfeits, to * a person remarkable for the want of it.' Thus this, his last fabrication, follows the rest. Returning to him once more, I find him saying, that ' he omits all notice of our other charges, though with his usual un- blushing effrontery he declares that he has tnswered them all, or evades them in the most pitiful manner.' It would indeed have been ' pitiful,' ' wond'rous pitiful,' if I had * omitted' one, or ^evaded' one. ' Other charges!' My answer to him was a ^arf/cw/crr, not a general one. Not a siaoh^ charge, or even insinuation against me, hut had my exact scrutiny. I took all of them separately, and manifested the juggle and falsehood of each. I left all, without a covering on the deformity of one ; and * in the most pitiful manner,' they lay, and still lie before me, a hideous mass of *pure undefecated fraud.* * Other charges ! ' 1 would submit the * potent, grave, and reverend' divine's Apocryphal article, and my pamphlet in answer to it, for comparison to his own parish-clerk ; with the certainty, that, on the point of omission, I should obtain a verdict from the Honesty of the reading-desk, against the Impostor in the pulpit. 'Infidelity is not so good a trade as it zeas/ says the reviewer, * four or five years ago,' and, therefore, ' Mr. Hone has published a pamphlet, announcing that his character has been quite mistaken, that he is a very sound Christian, and that in his opinion " Christianity is a pure principle — a mental illumination, &c. &c."' The latter words he quotes from my pamphlet, which he takes care to say was published * nearly E 36 three years' after his attack upon me. Lord Karnes, I think, remarks that it is in some degree a plea of guilty, to be over hasty or solicitous in making a defence. My grounds for answering his first aggression at such a distance of time from the assault, are stated in the pamphlet at considerable length. These he elects to conceal, and as he elects also to garble a passage from the answer I then made to his charge of * Infi- delity,' I shall extract the paragraph in which that passage stands. It is introduced by the observation, that, as a bookseller and publisher, ' I never speculated in any thing opposed to my Own sentiments; that I view those who oppose Christianity as opposed to an indestructible scheme of happiness, which in its beneficent progress embraces individuals, and in its final ac- complishment will include the whole human race ; and, that I regard Christianity, not as a Patent of Privilege to a few, but a Grant to all — as the Great Charter of mankind ; defining all rights; prescribing all duties ; prohibiting all wrong; pro- scribing all violence. Upon it every thing that is beneficial or permanent in society is founded: without it, the advocates and supporters of public Liberty can neither attain more nor main- tain what they have.' Immediately after this, the paragraph containing the passage garbled by the reviewer, commences thus : — "I was brought up in religious habits, but these are sur- faces, not principles. They were worn off by circumstances in early youth, when ' chewing the cud of sweet and bitter fancy' I wondered at the world and at myself, and theory after theory arose as the waves, weltering and dis- appearing. Ardently seeking for truth, I conversed with books rather than men, and hewed out principles as I could ; * here a little and there a little.' It is said, that ' many persons commence religious at first, they don't know why, and with a blind zeal persist in a religion which is they know not what.' (Jones on the Canon, vol. i. p. 14.) I am not among that number ; for it was by patient research and painful process that I arrived at that clear evidence for the truth of Christ- 27 ianity, wliich, if sincerely and diligently sought, is found to be irresistible. My religion is the religion of the New Testa- ment. As taught and exemplified by Christ himself, it is the perfection of all knowledge, * which is, and which was, and which is to come.' It is infinite wisdom. It is a pure princi- ple, a mental illumination; which, however dimmed by the cares and conflicts of the world, shines out in the solitude of the closet, when the eye turns inward. As regards conduct in life, it is the being held in a bond to do justice, lave mercy, and practise universal charity. There is no release from this obligation, though the disregard of it is a stumbling-block to thousands, whose conceptions of Christianity, being derived from the uncharitableness of nominal Christians, disincline them to explore the springs from whence vindictiveness and persecution seem to flow. In the words of Erasmus, * Chris- tian charity extends itself to all ; and he that does no hurt to any body though he be bad, and would rejoice if he would grow better, in my opinion, loves all as becomes a Christian to do.' '' This paragraph the reviewer wholly conceals from his reader's eyes, save only the four words printed above iu italics to denote them. He talks of ' the articles of our faith.' I unfeignedly believe, that no sincere member of that church which is visited by the infliction of his dispasturing care, will think his sneering selection of those four words, and his dishonest suppression of all the rest, can be evidence of his faith in any articles he may have dared to subscribe ; or of faith in the efficacy of any otherj^than the spurious principles of the two apocryphal articles which he dared to write, and has not dared to subscribe. ' The articles of our faith,' are ' our articles' in the Quarterly Review. * Infidelity is 7iot so good a trade as it was V His sarcasm falls short. He knew when he aimed it as a charge, that it was as much a fabrication as his quotation of * words not in it' was a forgery upon my preface. He cunningly keeps out of sight every reference that I made in my pamphlet to 28 the absence of even the possibility, that the charge of ' Infi- delity' could any way apply to my conduct. Hear me there citing from what I had written, before my trials, seven years ago. — * I console myself with the reflection, that amidst all I liave put on paper, there is * Not one immoral, one indecent thought, One line which, dying, I could wish to blot.' Nor can there be fomid a single paragraph, or even sentence of a profane or irreligious tendency in any of my publications. With a lively conception of wit, and an irresistible propensity to humour, 1 have likewise so profound a regard for the well- being of society, and so great a reverence for public morals, that 1 know of no temptation capable of inducing me to pen a line injurious to social happiness, or offensive to private virtue.' Hear me again, in my pamphlet, citing from the public re- ports of my trials, that I assured the public prosecutor * if in any one of the numerous pieces I had published, he could lay his finger on a single sentence of a profane or irreligious nature, or tending to degrade or bring religion into contempt, I would refrain from uttering another word in my defence.' Hear me also in my pamphlet, stating on the same authority, that I appealed to my Jurymen ' whether either of them had ever read a line of Hich a tendency in any of my publications V Hear me further, in my pamphlet, affirming that * from that hour to this, neither did, nor could any one, not even the most vindictive of ray enemies, in their fiercest heats, bring a fact of the sort against me.' Hear me likewise, in my pamphlet, inquiring whether at a recent period, ' when the press was teeming with such produc- tions, any of the nature I allude to came from me ?' Hear me in that pamphlet 'dare and defy the proof of a sentiment of that kind having been either penned or pubHshed by me ; or of any article of such a tendency having been sold or issued by any person in my employment.' This and more to the like effect was the answer of my pamphlet to the reviewer's charge of Infi- delity in his first article. His present article reviews that pam- ^9 phlet, conceals all this, and exclaims, ' Infidelity is not so good a trade as it was !' Tjie baseness of this is unsurpassable. Fearfully shrinking from the language of truth, his courage was; only equal to its violent perversion or mean suppression. Though his article occupies nearly ten pages of the Quarterly, he has not dared to quote a single sentence from my pamphlet ! Aspersions Answered, consists of sixty-four pages; his different quotations from it, taken separately and put together, do not, all together, amount to ten lines ! Ten sentences would have been death to him. ' Infidelity is not so good a trade as it zms!' Was it for this reason that the reviewer bound himself 'prentice to the church, played at * make Belief,' and perverted the principles tif Christianity into the practice of Pms^ianity? When I said, * He is a divine — he mat/ become a Christian,' I did not insi- nuate, but said, he was not a. Christian. That was my opinion of him when I proved his first imposture ; and his recent mal- versations attest its truth. Like the irreclaimable convict, who, at noon-day forced the very house that he had suffered a mild sentence for having before buiglariously entered; so, the re- viewer, unmindful of the chastisement he had received for his former delinquency, returns to his hold of fraud, and from thence renews upon me his criminal attacks. After the offences of deliberate perversion, falsification, and forgery, he evidences his turpitude by further depravities, and by felon insolence towards me, whom he had injured. It is not necessary here to pourtray * the character of a Christian man ;' but his, is its antithesis. He is the * Infidel !' I say to him, as the prophet of old said to the royal sinner, ' Thou art the man !' Nor will it be an answer to the accusation, that he wears sacerdotal robes, and repeats his creeds. One of them'begins, 'Whosoever will be saved, above all things it is necessary that he hold' — a living, is the substance of the rest with the reverend reviewer. The other two begin, * I believe,' and, accordingly, the re- viewer ' believes' for — his living. He may have read jn a book, which he is sometimes forced to read, that there 30 are other characters who ' believe, and tremble' too. I urge him to self examination; and to early inquiry — whether other than temporal motives urged him to swear that he 'believed he had a spiritual calling to the cure of souls ? And, after that inquiry — whether, being then either more or less evil than I have represented him, he, think himself, according to the rule of the New Testament, a spiritual mnni And, if he should not, whether his occupation of a place in the church to the exclusion of one who is, does not, according to that rule, bring him under the designation expressed in John, x. 2. ? I leave this matter for his soul's health, between him and the Seer of hearts, and his Diocesan. To all of my adversary's statements I have applied truth: and each instantly yielding to the flux, has dissolved into * air^ thin air.' Compared with him Psalmanazar, Lauder, and Dam- berger, were mere tyroes. He as much exceeds them in the use of that ' black art,' which has placed their names on the roll of deathless notoriety, as he excelled his least qualified rivals at Cambridge, in the attainments that enabled him to carry oflF honours from that university. His hiflexible persistance and power ,of execution give falsehood the very features of fact. ' Ferdinand Mendez Pinto was but a type of him.' He is an adept * of the first magnitude.' The reviewer purposed me much injury, yet I bear him no malice, for I am incapable of it towards any man. I said, in Aspersions Answered, that what I urged there was * not as a stepping-stone to controversy, for which I have unconquerable dislike ;' and that ' I purposed not to write another word on any topic connected with that pamphlet.' The declaration was sincere ; for I knew, that an honest notice of it on the part of the reviewer, must have been a confession of error, which, from him, I could not hope. His last wicked and silly half-sheet of fallacies, is an acknowledgment that he was reduced to the necessity of not holding me cheap— a public declaration of potency, in a contemned opponent, scarcely to have been expected from the tact of the Quarterly. It is 31 a bulletin announcing that the enemy is ' flagitious/ ' ferocious/ * one of a worthless crew/ * a miserable man/ ' a wretched pamphleteer/ * a poor creature/ and so forth, but that he has planted his colours on the Quarterly ramparts. In short, it is as it has been exhibited in these pages ; and its claim to that exhibition, from its thorough dishonesty, was irresistible. I had ' underrated' his former article, 'by assuming that it would not be overrated / and the experience, that the reviewer and I both have, of the consequences resulting from thinking too meanly of an adversary, determined me to break silence. Providence has furnished even the least of its beings with the means of self-defence ; and, therefore, what faculties I am blessed with I have put forth. The reviewer's pretence that Aspersions Answered was written by another hand, is a compli- ment to me and a reproach to himself, that he did not intend. Many with an university education, assume learning to be every thing ; and imagine, that men without it neither know, nor think, nor have the power of expressing themselves intel- ligibly. Yet learning is to some, but as a rich manure en- cumbering the barren surface it cannot cultivate. The mere man of learning only porters it ; he carries about the load, without a direction, all his life, and dies without pitching it. Others there are who open their learned accumulations to pur- poses of public and private instruction, and enrich the common stock of knowledge. From the liberal communications of tliese illustrious benefactors to mankind, authors and translators extract and interpret valuable portions, for that race of readers who called the Edinburgh and Quarterly Reviews into existence as purveyors to their demand for information ; and thus the business of knowledge is carried on. It is a low estimate of its thrifty progress, and of the talents of those among whom the reviewer has been permitted the exercise of his matchless ability for perversion, when he suggests that the progression has not extended to me. To persons of my station in society, the Quarterly itself is indebted for its maintenance ; and any reader must be pitiably deficient in capacity, if he do not possess it to the moderate extent of enabling him to detect the several 32 artifices, and general imposture of such an adversary. Nei- ther the manuscript of this, nor of the Aspersions An- swered, nor the least portion of either was seen by any one but myself, who wrote both, and the printer, who gave them to the world, verbatim, as they were written. It is the first time I engaged in controversy. The sheets in the reader's hand I have written during severe illness, and as honest De Foe says, * 1 am weary of the strife.' Doubtless, a hypercritic could append a tolerable errata to each tract, but their subject matter has defeated the reviewer's purposes, and that is suffi- cient. General apology is unnecessary, for any plainness of language which may be unacceptable to a few, who are never ' at home' to truth, except she appear in a court dress. I fear they receive her visits but seldom ; for her costume is rarely accommodated to ^JiJie company,' without danger to her ge- neral reception in ' good company,' and to her constitution. I was to be written down at any rate, and the reviewer pro- ceeded upon the nefarious principle that the end justifies the means. Under his last fraud, by which he sought to retrieve himself from my former exposure, and to effect his escape by defaming me, I was not less and could not afford to be more than human. I have proved it to be the miserable defence of a miserable man, * who ever double, both in his words and meaning, gives the clergy ill example.' I have done with him. My foe has drunk of the cup of his deservings, and the Quar- terly will not afford a ' dole' on th6 ' border/ for the fall of so foul a champion. If writers like these are encouraged by that Review, it will become * a bolting hutch of beastliness ;' from whence sleek vermin will ever and anon be dragged forth, to suffer for their predatory irruptions. The attitude of the Quarterly is a commanding one, but it can only be secured by moral qualities. Should it print high numbers, with a succes- sion of such articles as I have discussed, Mr. Murray's ware- house for it will present ' a boundless continuity of waste,' THE END. Typographical Error— f. 17. 1. 12. Instead of ' for several passages after this passage/ read, 'pages after this passage.' # \