• ■-> i- sj^^ .^-<^.^ N . THE KNIGHTS ARISTOPHANES. TBAKSLATED BT T. MITCHELL, A. M. tATJE FELIOW OF SIDNEY- SUSSEX COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE. FIRST AMERICAN EDITION. WASHINGTON CITY: GARRET ANDERSON. 1S37. ft^nX PREFACE TO THE AMERICAN EDITION. 9©0 If the American Editor of this little volume (which is sent forth as a test of the character of American learning) deemed it either expedient or necessary to expatiate upon the merits of an author so celebrated and gifted as Aristophanes, he might extend his eulogia beyond the patient perusal of the moderns. The eloquent and erudite preliminary discourse by the accomplished translator, however, anticipates the remarks which otherwise would be expanded. No satirist, ancient or modern, ever enjoyed the deserved reputation of Aristophanes, and no one ever depicted, in colors so vivid and unfading, the essential and peculiar charac- teristics of democracy. As he lived under the dominion of the Universal People, he thoroughly understood the qualities of the democrats whom he has ridiculed and immortalized; and he never shrunk, when occasion demanded, from the exposure of flagrant abuses. Therefore, we commend, earnestly commend the perusal of this volume to our literary countrymen: and if the reception of this limited edition of a single comedy shall justify the editor in the more enlarged republication of all the works of Aristophanes, he will rejoice in the opportunity, thus afforded, of instructing and enlightening his countrymen. ORIGINAL PREFACE The volume here submitted to the reader's attention, forms a part of a work which was prepared for publication in the spring of 1816. With the causes which have hitherto delayed its ap- pearance it is not thought necessary to trouble the public. The translator, however, has taken advantage of the interval thus afforded, in endeavoring to make himself better acquainted with subjects collaterally connected with his author; but the main ob- ject, the translations, he has left nearly in their original condition, under the impression that, if any of the spirit and raciness of the original could be caught, it would be, generally speaking, in the first transfusion; and that, in this particular instance of authorship, a certain air of roughness would be preferable to an appearance of too much intense labor and polish. The general plan upon which it was proposed to conduct this work having long been submitted to the public, the translator can only allow himself to say that he is not aware of having hitherto deviated from it. His great object has been to direct the reader's . attention to the text, and to leave his judgment to infer such po- litical lessons as seemed fairly dcduciblc from it. Whatever notes have been added, have been subjoined with the view of rendering the text more intelligible; and every endeavor has been used to shorten and reduce them as much as possible. Some opinions expressed in the course of this volume, on the moral character of the Athenians, (and on them, collectively, it seemed more proper to alhx reproach, in many instances, than on the dramatist, whose busuiess it was to paint and to please his auditors according to their own notions of amusement,) may, perhaps, appear unreason- ably severe. But the reader must recollect that the complete evidence on which these opinions have been founded is not before him; and that the translator, in being obliged to wade through some dirt himself, has been as careful as possible to let none fall on the by-stander. Perhaps this reserve has been carried too far. The old comedy of the Greeks approaches very nearly to history: and "it is the business of history," says a writer frequently quoted in the following pages, "to represent men, not such as they should be, but such as they have been; and thus learning," adds Mr. Mitford, "what they should be, through observation of what they should not bo, far more vriluable instruction, both political and Yr ORIGINAL PREFACE. moral, may be gathered, than from any visionary description of perfection in human nature." The opinions thus forcibly ex- pressed add weight to the suspicion which has sometimes crossed the translator's mind, that in the execution of this work, an un- willingness to uncover the nakedness of a people whose writers have been our parents in almost every species of knowledge, has influenced him too powerfully, and that a wider scope should have been given to a species of humor, the chief merit of which lies in its close and faithful delineation of popular feelings, popular habits, and popular modes of speech. For any warmth of expression which may have been used in discussing the political character of the Athenians, this is certainly not the time to apologize. Aware, as the writer is, that in a constitution so nicely balanced as our own, any exclusive view of politics ought carefully to be avoided, — yet, when an outrage necessarily growing out of those studied attempts long made to degrade the crown and aristocracy of England, and even to as- similate her admirable constitution to that of the democracies of Italy or Greece, is perpetrating in our streets — he may rather doubt whether he has held up the inward hollowness and rotten- ness of one of these democracies in a manner sufficiently striking, than fear that he has exposed her corruptions and her crimes in language too glowing. In the atrocious transaction which at this moment fills every heart with indignation and horror, England has, for the first time, witnessed one of those foul scenes which so often stain the pages of Thucydides, and which make Dante blacken at the name of Florence, in Hell, in Purgatory, in Heaven. That "city of division," as he emphatically calls her, enjoyed no monopoly of crime among her republican neighbors and prede- cessors; and it was in the fullest sense of this feeling (a feeling which we, alas ! can now better appreciate) that this sublimest of her poets, in the full maturity of his intellect, and with such mon- sters as the Eccelins and the Visconti before his eyes, deliberately reserved the climax of retribution in his scale of guilt for the betrayer* of his master, and the assassins of their ruler and king. This volume is committed to the public with the certain know- ledge, that whatever may be its deficiencies, they will soon be detected; but with a confidence no less certain, that they who are best able to point out those deficiencies, will be the foremost to make all candid allowances for them. To an important part of it, a degree of favor and indulgence has been extended in another place, which the writer was wholly unprepared to expect. He can only hope that that favor may not be forfeited by its present ap- pearance. For any labor which the rest of the volume may have cost him, he shall feel amply repaid if it occasionally wrest from the reader the good-humored Frenchman's concession: — J^ai ri — me voila desarme. •Inferno, Canto XXXIV. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. The origin, technical construction and divisions of the Greek Comedy have been sufficiently explained in the works of several popular writers : the Lectures of Blair, the Observer of Cumberland, and Brumoy's The- atre des Grecs affording satisfactory references for those readers, who want information on any or all of these topics. The purport and bear- ings of that particular branch of it, known by the name of Old Comedy, with the views and character of the person wlio carried it to its greatest height, have recently been discussed by two most distinguished scho- lars and brothers, whose works are in the hands of every man of letters, and whose critical opinions are now received with deference and respect throughout Europe. The Messrs Schlegels have placed the great comic poet of antiquity on a ground, high indeed, but on a ground, which every scholar, intimately acquainted with his writings, will allow to be no more than his due.* Had these two critics offered a clue for ascer- * " If we would judge of Aristophanes as a writer and as a poet," says M. F. Schlegel, (and his remarks, exclusively of their own merit, require insertion, as forming the groundwork of what is here offered,) " we must transplant our- selves freely and entirely into the age in which he lived. In the modern ages of Europe it has often been made the subject of reproach against particular na- tions or periods, that literature in general, but principally the poets and their works, have too exclusively endeavoured to regulate themselves according to the rules of polished society, and, above all, the prejudices of the female sex. Even among those nations, and in those periods which have been most fre- quently charged with this fault, there has been no want of authors who have loudly lamented that it should be so, and asserted and maintained, with no in- considerable zeal, that the introduction of this far-sought elegance and gallantry, not only into the body of literature as a whole, but even into those departments of it where their presence is most unsuitable, has an evident tendency to make lite- rature tame, poor, uniform, and unmanly. It may be that there is some founda- tion for this complaint : the whole literature of antiquity, but particularly that of the Greeks, lies open to a reproach of an entirely opposite nature. If our lite- rature has sometimes been too exclusively feminine, theirs was at all times uni- formly and exclusively masculine, not unfrequently of a nature far more rough and unpolished than might have been expected from the general intellectual character and refinement of the ancients." After a few brief remarks on the degraded state of female society in Greece, and the baneful effect it had upon Grecian literature, M. Schlegel proceeds — 2 10 PRELIMINARV DISCOURSE. taining the reasons, by which this extraordinary writer came so rudely into contact with a contemporary still more extraordinary, a volume " Here, where we are treating of the decline of Grecian manners, and of the writer who has painted that decline the most powerfully and the most clearly— the consideration of this common defect of antiquity has, 1 imagine, been not improperly introduced. But when this imperfection has once been distinctly recognized as one the reproach of which affects in justice not the individual writers, but rather the collective character, manners, and literature of antiquity; it were absurd to allow ourselves to be any longer so much influenced by it, as to disguise from ourselves the great qualities often found in combination with it in writings which are altogether invaluable to us, both as specimens of poetical art, and as representations of the spoken wit of a very highly refined state of society; to refuse, in one word, to perceive in Aristophanes the great poetwhich he really is. It is true that the species and form of his writing — if indeed that can be said with propriety to belong to any precise species or form of composi- tion — are things to which we have no parallel in modern letters. All the pecu- liarities of the Old Comedy may be traced to those deifications of physical powers, which were prevalent among the ancients. Among them, in the festi- vals dedicated to Bacchus and other frolicsome deities, every sort of freedom, even the wildest ebullitions of mirth and jollity were not only things permit- ted, they were strictly in character, and formed, in truth, the consecrated cere- monial of the season. The fancy, above all things, a power by its very nature impatient of constraint, the birthright and peculiar possession of the poet, was on these occasions permitted to attempt the most audacious heights, and revel in the wildest world of dreams, loosened for a moment from all those fetters of law,custom, and propriety, which at other times, and in other species of writing, must ever regulate its exertion even in the hands of poets. The true poet, how- ever, at whatever time this old privilege granted him a Saturnalian license for the play of his fancy, was uniformly impressed with a sense of the obligation under which he lay, not only by a rich and various display of his inventive genius, but by the highest elegance of language and versification, to maintain entire his poetical dignity and descent, and to show, in the midst of all his ex- travagances,^ that he was not animated by prosaic petulance, nor personal spleen, but inspired with the genuine audacity and fearlessness of a poet. Of this there is the most perfect illustration in Aristophanes. In language and versification his excellence is not barely acknowledged — it is such as to entitle him to take his place among the first poets to whom Greece has given birth. In many pas- sages of serious and earnest poetry, which (thanks to the boundless variety and lawless formation of the popular comedy of Athens) he has here and there introduced, Aristophanes shows himself to be a true poet, and capable, had he so chosen, of reaching the highest eminence even in the more dignified depart- ments of his art. " This might be abundantly sufficient, not indeed to represent Aristophanes as a fit subject of imitation, for that he can never be, but to set his merit as a poet in its true light. But if we examine into the use which he has made as a man, but more particularly as a citizen, of that liberty which was his poetical birthright, both by the manners of antiquity, and by the constitution of his country, we shall find many things which might be said still further in his vin- PU'EMMIKARY DISCOURSE. II which attempts to give some faint idea of his works by ttanslalion, might commence its labours without any additional demand on the reader's patience. This however the Messrs Schlegels have not done, and room is still left for discussing, how it happened that the wisest and the wittiest men of Athens were made to jostle so roughly against each other. At this distance of time it cannot be expected that materials should be found for setting the subject completely at rest; and indeed, when we consider how lately and with what difficulty one of the bright- est ornaments of our own literature has been rescued from the calumnies of ignorance, misrepresentation, and malevolence, we may demand to be excused, if after all our researches, some disputed points of relation- ship between a poet and philosopher of two thousand years back, remain still unexplained. Disquisitions, however, of this kind are never with- out their use; besides their own intrinsic importance, they often serve, like Selden's straws, to show how the wind blows in some of the most important topics, which belong to all ages and countries, and which can never be brought under review too often. It will be taken then for granted, that the reader is acquainted with some of the leading differ- ences between the scenic representations of the Greeks and our own. He will be supposed to know, that the dramas of that people grew out of and formed part of their religious ceremonies — that they were ex- dication, and which cannot indeed fail to raise him personally in our esteem. His principal merit, as a patriot, consists in the fidelity with which he paints all the corruptions of the state, and in the chastisement which he inflicts on the pestilent demao-ogues who caused that corruption or profited by its effects. The latter duty was attended with no inconsiderable danger in a state governed by a democracy, and during a time of total anarcliy ; yet Aristophanes has performed it with the most fearless resolution. It is true that he pursues and parodies Euripides with unrelenting severity; but this is perfectly in character with the old spirit of merciless enmity which animated all the comic poets against the tragedians ; and it is impossible not to perceive that not only the more ancient ^schylus, but even his contemporary Sophocles, is uniformly mentioned in a tone altogether different, in a temper moderate and sparing; nay, very frequently, with tiie profoundcst feelings of admiration and respect. // formr, another grie- vous subject of reproach agninst Jlristophanes, that he has represented in colours so odious, Socrates, the most wise and the most virtuous of all his fellowcitizens ; it is, however, hy no means improbable that this was not the effect of mere poetical wan- tonness,- butt/tat Aristophanes selected, without any bad intention, that first and best of illustrious names, that he might, under if, render the Sophists as ridiculous as they deserved to be, and as foolish and worthless in the eyes of the people as he could make them. The poet, it is not unlikely, in his own mind, mingled and cotifounded, even without wishing it, this inestimable sage with his enemies the So- phists, whose schools he frequented in his maturer years, solely with the view of ma- king himself master of that which he intended to refute and overthroir. Lectures on the History of Literature, pp. 57 — G2. 12 PRKLIMIXARY DISCOURSE. hibited in theatres of a colossal size compared with ours — that the *time3 of exhibition were at distant intervals — that when those few intervals did take place, the whole day was devoted to theatrical entertainments — that a prize was conferred on the most successful competitor — and that a piece once performed, was never, in the same shape at least, represented a second time. He will further be supposed to have some knowledge of the general principles of that peculiar part of the ancient drama, the old comedy, as it is called, in contradistinction to what was afterwards named the middle, and the new : — as that it stood in the extreme relation of contrariety and parody to the tragedy of the Greeks — that it was directed chiefly to the lowerf orders of society at Athens — that it served in some measure the purposes of the modern Journal, in which public measures and the topics of the day might be fully dis- cussed ; and that in consequence the dramatis personse were generally the poet's own contemporaries, speaking in their own names, and act- ing in masks, which, as they bore only a caricature resemblance of their faces, showed that the poet in his observations upon them did not mean to be taken literally to his expression. Like tragedy, it consti- tuted part of a religious ceremony ; and the character of the deity, to whom it was more particularly dedicated, was stamped at times pretty visibly upon the work which was composed in his honour. The JDi- onysian festivals, in short, were the great Carnivals of antiquity — they * It will be sufficient for the present purpose to mention the Spring and Au- tumnal Festivals of Bacchus, as being the seasons most particularly devoted to those amusements. Authors generally reserved their pieces for the former Fes- tival, as Athens was at that time crowded with strangers, the allies or tributaries of that imperious metropolis, and the theatres were not then confined, as at other times, exclusively to the natives of Attica. f Besides internal evidence, many expressions of Aristotle and Plato might be quoted to this effect. The latter, indeed, goes so far, as to rank, in his Treatise on Legislation, the performance of the comic theatre as only one degree above jugglers' tricks. Puppet-shows and jugglers' tricks, he there observes, are best adapted to the taste of boys — comedy to that of growing lads — and tragedy to that of young men, and the better classes of women. Elder men were to find their entertainment in the recitations of Rhapsodists. We are not to take Plato's word too strictly in this occasion. Between the philosophers and the comic writers there was always open war; and Plato, who at any rate felt no scruple in borrowing pictures and images from Aristophanes, returned the obligation by indulging in some open and a little more covert abuse of his writings. X A sort of Dionysian Festival still observed once every four years, in the neighbourhood of Vevay — that scene of " Recollections" and of natural beauties — to which the muse of Lord Byron alone could do justice. It was a great mortification to the writer of these notes to be there about the time of its cele- bration, and to find that the distresses of the times did not admit of its being observed as usual. PRELIMINARY -DISCOURSE. 13 celebrated the returns of vernal festivity or the joyous vintage, and were in consequence the great holidays of Athens — the seasons of universal relaxation. The comic poet was the high priest of the festival ; and if the orgies of his divinity (the God of Wine) sometimes demanded a style of poetry, which a Father of our Church probably had in his eye, when he called all poetry the deviVs wine, the organ of their utterance (however strange it may seem to us) no doubt considered himself as perfectly absolved from the censure which we should bestow on such productions : in their composition he was discharging the same pious office as the painter, whose duty it was to fill the temples of the same deity with *pictures, which our imaginations would consider equally ill * The indulgence granted to this abuse in the time of Aristotle may be seen in the Seventh Book of his Politics, c. 17. As this Discourse has been almost entirely confined to the precise period of the representation of the Clouds, this reference to a later writer would not have been made, had not a curious passage in the Hippolytus of Euripides (v. 1003,) justified us in taking it for granted, that the custom was as prevalent in the days of Aristophanes as it was in the time of Aristotle. Good taste, as well as other considerations, requires that this part of our subject should be dismissed as hastily as possible; but the usages of a large (and that too the most enlightened) portion of antiquity, cannot be alto- gether passed over in silence ; and it is of importance to show, that the value, so justly due to a great part of the Aristophanic writings, does not deserve to be impugned from a mistaken supposition, that he stood single among his country- men, in the use of such language, and allusions, as would be revolting in their display to modern feelings, whatever excuse may be found for them in our knowledge of the manners of antiquity. The Greek Comedy (according to the express testimony of Aristotle,) grew out of the Phallic Hymn, as the Greek Tragedy was merely an improvement upon the Dithyrambic Hymn ; and if the tragedian could not wholly rescue his drama from the god of the vintage and his fantastic attendants the Satyrs, (as many low scenes and much snappish dialogue, clear proofs of the origin of Greek tragedy, sufficiently testify,) we may be very sure, that an entire departure from the canons, which regulated the construction of the Phallic Hymn, would not be tolerated in a comic poet. There is authority, in fact, for asserting, that the consequences were fatal to one of the Greek dramatists, who presumed to put his own good taste on this point too violently in opposition with the taste of his audience. If Comedy too looked to the Margeites of Homer for an example, on which to model herself, as her sister muse did to his Iliad and Odyssey, enough of that poem remains in tradi- tion to show what kind of humour would be required as the predominant article. But the usages of common life among the Greeks form the completest apology for the aberrations of the Greek stage. Let the reader open any of the volumes of the " Antiquit6s d'Herculanum," and see what ohjects daily met the eyes of men and women both at home and abroad, and he will have little reason to be surprised at any freaks, which the gay Muse of Comedy might allow herself during the permitted license of the Dionysian festivities. How much of this proof of simplicity or depravity in the ancients (for vehement advocates have been found for both opinions) is to be attributed to the sources from which the Greek mythology was derived — to oriental traditions received through the me- 14 rr.ELIMTXARV DI?COTJRSK. suiled to the habitations of the tliviuity. What religion tliercfore forbids among us, the religion of the Greeks did not merely tolerate, but enjoin. Nor was the extreme and even profane gaiety of the old comedy with- out its excuse. To unite extravagant mirth with a solemn seriousness was enjoined by law, even in the sacred festival of Ceres. The feast of Bacchus retained the license without the embarrassment of the re- straint. While the philosophers, therefore, querulously maintained, that man was the joke and plaything of the gods, the comic poet re- versed the picture, and made the gods the plaything of men : in his hands, indeed, everything was upon the broad grin ; the gods laughed, men laughed, animals laughed. Nature was considered as a sort of fantastic being, with a turn for the humorous, and the world was treated as a sort of extended jest book, where the poet pointed out the bons- mots, and acted in some degree as corrector of the press. If he dis- charged this office sometimes in the sarcastic spirit of a *Mephistophi- lus, this too was considered as a part of his fimctions : he was the Terrae-Filius of the day, and lenity would have been considered, not as an act of discretion, but as a cowardly dereliction of duty. Of the species of comedy thus described, whoever was the inventor, whether fEpicharmus or Phormis, Aristophanes was the great finisher and perfecter. With an ear tuned to the nicest modulations of harmony, and with a temperament apparently most joyous and jovial, he was just fitted for the entertainment of a people, of whom Philip of Macedon, dium of Egypt, we must leave to the antiquarians to decide. But it may be thrown out as a fair conjecture, that the mysterious phallic emblem, which made so important a part in the religious ceremonies of Greece, and the a-Kvrtvov ttioc, which was in consequence so frequently introduced upon the stage, were mere substitutions, according to the genius of the Greeks, for the lingam or passive generating principle of the Hindoos. * In the Faust of Goethe, and in that work only of all modern productions, some idea may be formed of the rich harmonies and splendid versification of Aristophanes. The power which the German language has of approximating to the more simple of the Grecian metres, and of adding to that power the full- est richness of modern rhyme, makes it doubtful to the ear, which of the two writers ought to be preferred ; — were the Athenian read with his proper accen- tuation, there would perhaps be no doubt on the subject. There are other points of relation between these two writers, besides those of versification. To the great and overwhelming tragic powers of Goethe, Aristophanes, of course, can make no pretension : but in their preference of the arbitrary comic to the comic of manners, the two writers come very close together; and both writers should have lived, as Madame de Sta'el expresses it, when there was an intellectual chaos, similar to the material chaos. Had Aristophanes written in modern times, it is, perhaps, not impertinent to suggest, that the " Auerbach's Keller in Leipzig," the Hexenhuche, the Walpurgisnach, and perhaps the quizzing scene with the young student, just fresh from his university, are precisely the sort of scenes which would have fallen from his pen. f Arist. de Poet. hb. i. § 11. PRELIMINARY DlfeXOUKSE. 15 when he compared them to the Hermaic statues, so common in their streets, drew in a few words one of the most happy and characteristic descriptions of a people, which is upon record. That gaiety which is so well adapted to a nation of quick natural parts, and which has so few charms for persons of cultivated understandings, the gaiety which consists* in painting pleasantly the dullness of the understanding {la betise) and in inspiring buffoonery ; of that gaiety, which has been made equally the basis of Italian and Grecian comedy, Aristophanes was pre- eminently the master. Music, dancing, metre, decoration — all that union of amusement, which the Greeks, a seeing and not a reading public, (this fact cannot be too much in our minds, when we are talking of their dramatic literature,) required of their writers for the stage, Aris- tophanes seems to have improved;! the muse of Comedy herself he left as he found her — a beautiful Titania, matchless in her outward propor- tions, but with a spell upon her affections, and showering favours, which should have been better bestowed — upon an ass's head, with Bottom, the weaver, below it. An utter aversion to every species of affectation, and a most splenetic hatred to Euripides, (derived from deeper views of things, than people have generally given the comedian credit for,) perhaps guided Aristophanes on this point. He found that poet, half- pleader, and half-bard, as he contemptuously calls him, affecting to rescue the sister muse of tragedy from the coarse hands of ^Eschylus, under whom she had been pampered into a sort of cumbrous ostenta- tious Amazon. A course of strait-lacing and cool diet was bringing her a little more into compass : her appearance had already become more genteel, and only a little more polish was necessary to fit her for the society of the Sophists, to whose schools she continually resorted for the little prettinesses, and affectations and delicacies of thought and ex- pression, which were for ever in her mouth. A rough hand and a good course of bark and steel were necessary to repair the spreading mischief and infection. The puns of the Peiraeus,:^ and the proverbs * Litterature du Midi, torn. ii. p. 367. f He particularly reformed the Cordax or Danceof Comedy, which, however, in the time of Thcophrastus, seems to have relapsed into its former state of rn- decorousness. See the sixth of those inimitable Characters which he has left us. -\. We are apt to forget that Athens was the greatest maritime power of anti- quity ; but Aristophanes, a consummate politician amid all his buIToonery, knew perfectly well where her real strength lay ; he therefore takes every occasion of paying court to the naval part of his audience, the " nautic multitude," as Xeno- phon calls them, and advocates their rights upon all occasions. How much Plato and he were at variance upon this point, see the fourth book of his Legis- lation. Aristotle coincides with the poet, De Rep. 1. vii. c. C. Tlie learned reader will remember various passages of Xenophon and Isocrates, expressing their respective opinions on this important topic. 16 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. of the *Agora, and the coarse jokes of the Eeclesia and Heliaea were therefore diliffcntly collected and culled, and showered from a full cor- nucopia, in all their native richness and strength upon an audience, who must have found in them a charm, of which we are wholly unsusceptible. Perhaps, too, it added some charm to their value, in the eyes of democratical pride and vanity, that it was a man of rank and property (for Aristophanes was both) who thus condescended to amuse his audience according to their own notions of pleasantry and humour. Till the fatal exhibition therefore of the Clouds, the dramatic career of Aristophanes had been short, but eminently successful. His first play, (the Dsetaleis,) which was brought out before the author had reached the age established by law,t we know to have been received with the most flattering attention : his " Babylonians" could boast the triumph of having at once excited and defeated the vengeance of that pestilent demagogue, who seems, as the historian expresses it, to have been as much born for the depression of Athens, as Miltiades, Themistocles, Cymon and Pericles were for its elevation; while the prize of victory had been awarded to his comedies of the Acharnians and the Knights. Diffidence^ had thus been removed : exertion was stimulated ; and grati- tude, success, emulation and hope, all urged the writer to press forward in a career, which had commenced under such favourable auspices. The first of the dramatic pieces of Aristophanes seems to have been * The Agora was the public place of the Greeks, which, however, differed very considerably from the Forum of the Romans, the substitute generally given for it. This substitution of Roman terms for Grecian, has occasioned a great deal of confusion in the minds of readers. Works of humour cannot safely dis- pense with them : for humour must be excited by appealing to ideas already resident in the mind, as there must be material ready to receive the sparks eli- cited from flint in order to create a flame. Writers upon serious subjects are not so tied by their subjects, and an appeal may be made to scholars, whether it is not time, that the mythologies of the two great nations of antiquity should be kept more distinct by the introduction of a Zeus, a Poseidon, and a Chronus, as well as a Jupiter, a Neptune, and a Saturn. I Wieland, in the notes to his translation of the " Clouds," quotes the autho- rity of the Scholiast for saying, that there is an uncertainty whether the legal age for exhibiting a dramatic piece, was twenty or thirty years of age. In the former case, Aristophanes could have been little more than twenty-four or twenty-five years old when he produced that elaborate composition. In Kuster's edition, the Scholiast (apparently with good reason) places the established age ten years later than Wieland does ; the office was one of serious national im- portance, and therefore, not likely to be committed to a mere youth. ^ Diffidence is'a quality not usually ascribed to this poet : but his well-known repugnance to take a part in the performance of his own plays (the usual prac- tice of the times) till he was forced into it by circumstances, (see the preface to the Knights in this volume,) and the Parabases in the Knights and the Clouds, fully establish the fact. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 17 directed against the state of private manners in Athens ;* in his Achar- nians he endeavoured to moderate the insolence of national success, and to infuse juster notions respecting a great public measure, which was putting the existence of the Athenians as a people at stake ; while in the knights, or, as it may more properly be termed, the Demagogues, a mirror was held up to his fellow-citizens, where the ruler and the ruled saw themselves reflected with equal fidelity, and by which pos- terity has gained a complete knowledge of the greatest historical phae- nomenon that ever appeared, the Athenian Demus. It remained for the author to strike at the root of all these evils, private and public, domestic and political — a mischievous and most pernicious system of education. This was undoubtedly the origin and object of the Clouds; and a brief outline of the progress of knowledge among the Greeks, and more particularly of that branch of it, which was comprehended under the name of " Philosophy," will at once tend to explain the aim of the author, and throw some light upon the comedy itself. That Aristophanes had not entered lightly or without reflection upon the office of a public instructor, this mere arrangement of his subjects, at an age when, if not youthful in years, he was at least young in his career, sufficiently testifies ; and we may here see what might have been expected from him in maturer years, if public favour had patronised this attempt to raise the comedy of his country above its ordinary level, and to make it something more than a scene of ebullition for the noisy jollity and licentious revelry of the Dionysian festivals. The proper epoch of Grecian literature begins with Solon. Before his time, says Frederic Schlegel, the Greeks possessed no more than commonly falls to the share of every people who are blessed with a favourable corporeal organization, while they are animated with the fresh impulses of a youthful society — traditions which hold the place of histories, and songs and poems which are repeated and remembered so as to serve instead of books. Such songs, as this excellent writer proceeds to observe, calculated to arouse national feelings, to give ani- mation in the hour of battle, or to be sung at the festivals of their reli gion, the Greeks possessed, in the utmost variety, from the most early period of their existence as a nation. They possessed also in abund- ance those still more valuable songs of narrative, which express not the feelings that seize and overpower an individual poet, but which embody the recollection and the feelings of the people — the faint memory of an almost fabulous antiquity — the achievements of heroes and of gods— * The principal characters in this play, of which only a few fragments have reached us, were two brothers : their names, Sophron and Catapygox, suffi- ciently evince, that the object of the play was to establish a comparison between the temperate virtues of the good old times (a favourite theme of Aristophanes) and the unrestrained and unexampled dissoluteness of his own age. 3 18 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. the origin of a nation, and the creation of the world. Among these stood, highly preeminent, the Homeric poems, the still astonishing works of the Iliad and the Odyssey. In committing these poems to memory, numerous as we have seen and while books were scarce and valuable, many of them perhaps to be learned only by oral communication ; in understanding critically their beauties and defects, and in attaining, through them, a perfect know- ledge of that wonderful language, which, formed amid migrations and revolutions of every kind, yet attained to such perfection, as to make all subsequent languages appear nearly barbarous, consisted a great part, and, from the effect it had in cultivating the imagination at the expense of the understanding, many persons will think a very vicious part, of Athenian education. But the principal development of the faculties was left to be effected by the two opposite engines, at once producing and evincing that love of contrast, which obtained so much among the Athenians, and which forms the great key to ascertaining their character — music and gymnastic exercises. What the music itself of the ancients ever was, we have now, as a very competent observer remarks, little means of judging, as none of it has been transmitted intelligible to us ; but that the Grecian music, even from the earliest times, had extraordi- nary merit, we have Plato's* testimony in very remarkable words ; and Aristotle, who, according to Montesquieu, had two ruling motives to guide his decisions, affection for Alexander, and a jealousy against Plato, upon this subject coincides in judgment with his great master. It appears indeed a solecism, as Mr Mitford observes, to suppose that those elegant perceptions and nice organs which gave form to the most harmonious language ever spoken among men, and guided invention to the structure of that verse which, even under the gross disguise of mo- dern pronunciation, is still universally charming, could have produced or could have tolerated a vicious or inelegant style of music. As in- struments of education, Plato delights to dwell upon these two powerful engines : he paints, in the most earnest language, their ill effects, when pursued separately and immoderately ; their admirable influence, when conjointly and temperately. Naturally mystic and fanciful, it is not * Minos, 46 (B). Convivium, 333 (B). The two grf^at founders of the Gre- cian music, Marsyas and Olympus, seem, from the discoveries made at Hercu- laneum, to have been very favourite objects of representation with the sculptors and artists of Greece. Olympus is generally represented, as a young man of exquisite beauty and the most graceful proportions, taking lessons on the pan- pipe from Marsyas; the latter, from that love of contrast, which ran through the Grecian arts, or from that idea of ridicule, which latterly attached among the Athenians to the professors of wind music, is generally drawn as a Satyr, as enormous in his proportions as Olympus is delicate. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. W likely that this philosopher should be always clear or plain,* when subjects which offered so much temptation to both his ruling propen- sities, as harmony and the exercises of the palaestra, were under his consideration ; what share they had in producing that physical perfec- tion at least — that union of strength and elegance in the body, and that capacity in the organs for receiving impressions from works of art and * The difficulty consists, in a great degree, in the application of the same words to music as it acted upon the senses and emotions, and to music as it bore upon grammar, and language, and upon all that range of knowledge, which, giving a complete polish to the mind, makes Plato call his perfect philosopher a perfect musician. (De Rep. 1. ix.) Till we can ascertain from Aristotle more clearly than we ever shall do, (see his Politica, lib. viii c. 5, 6, 7.) what were the moral harmonies which the Greeks applied to the purposes of education — the practical harmonies, the application of which is wholly uncertain — and the sacred melodies which were directed to the purgation of enthusiasm, we must be content to remain in ignorance of that revolution in music, of which Aristo- phanes and Plato so much complain as taking place in their day, and which the latter declares, was alone sufficient to shake all the establishments of state to their centre. There is some obscurity even in the following passages, which describe what we should call the practical effects of music and gymnastic ex crcises ; but there is the hand of a master in the description. " When a man allows music to pipe into him, and to make use of his ears, like funnels, for the Infusion of soft, sweet and plaintive harmonies; when he passes his time in the titillations of those soothing enjoyments, wliich song affords — what courage he had in him becomes softened like iron ; and thus losing its hardness, it becomes fitted for the commerce of life : but if this delight be pursued immoderately, if this iron be put into a state of fusion, the courage gradually melts away, the nerves of the soul are cut out, and a feeble warriour is the result of such a sys- tem of conduct. In a person naturally feeble, this result would naturally be more speedy in taking place : in one of a naturally courageous soul, nature being weakened and rendered easy to be thrown off its balance, the least things irritate and soothe him — and instead of being bold and resolute, such a person becomes passionate, morose, full of fantasies and a troublesome fastidiousness. Again, if a person give himself up to the labours of the gymnasium and to feasts, with- out attention to music or philosophy, such a man becomes filled with high thoughts and courage, and exceeds himself in bravery; but if he do nothing else, if he have no communication with the Muses, even though there had been origi- nally a love of learning in bis mind, yet without tasting of that instruction which is gained by application, by inquiry and conversation, he becomes weak, and deaf, and blind, like a man that is never awakened, nor nourished, nor that has his feelings purified. Such a man becomes a hater of conversation and averse from the Muses: in his language he uses no persuasion ; he docs everything, like a beast, by force and ferocity; and he lives in ignorance and rudeness, with- out any accompaniment of grace or politeness." — The Platonic Socrates therefore concludes, that the gods had given music and gymnastic exercises to men, that by blending the two properly together the soul might be made perfect in its two greatest endowments, a temperate courage and a philosophic understanding. De Rpp. lib. iii. »0 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. beauty — which has generally been conceded to the Greeks — we may gather from the observations which he has left us, most unsparingly, upon the subject. From the earliest periods, education among the greater part of the Athenians seems to have embraced little more than the circle here described : and till the age of Pericles, the three great preceptors of Athenian youth remained as before ; — the grammarian, the teacher of music, and the master of the gymnasium.* But there \vere some minds of a higher cast and of more restless energies than to be satisfied with this narrow range of instruction ; and the same shore which had given birth to the great father of Grecian poetry had, in the person of the Milesian Thales, provided a preceptor, who was at once calculated to excite and, to a certain extent, to gratify that love of research and deep and curious speculation, which seems to have been at least inherent in the Grecian character, as a love of poetry and the fine arts. How congenial these pursuits were with their na- tional temperament may be inferred from the single remark, that the fire which Thalesf lighted up, has never since been extinguished among them. His own schoolj was followed in quick succession by the Ita- lian, and Eleatic,§ where physical and metaphysical knowledge were followed with equal success ; and the dialogues of Plato furnish the most ample testimony of the zeal and fervour with which they were pursued in Athens, as soon as a respite from revolution and wars gave leisure for their introduction into that inquisitive town. The struggle which the Greek philosophy maintained with the doctrines of Christi- * Alcibiades, the nephew of the first man in Athens, confesses in the first of those dialogues, which go by his name, that his education had not extended beyond the three masters here mentioned. Alcibiades, lus. 26. D. E. In the time of Aristotle we find painting added to the routine of education. The Sta- geirite gives two reasons for the addition thus made to the old range of instruc- tion — that men might acquire a more accurate tact in estimating the beauty of the human body, and that they might not be cheated in the purchase or sale of those domestic ornaments or necessaries, which came under the common name of a-mvit. Arist. de Rep. 1. viii. c. 3. f We believe we might go much farther than Thales to show the inherent passion of the Greeks for physical pursuits. Many of their earliest mythical fables — Orpheus with his seven-string'd lyre — the double character of Tiresias — the golden ram of Phryxus — the Thyestean banquet, etc., are all perhaps referable to astronomic researches. See the Treatise de Astrologia, generally attributed to Lucian. v. 5. Bip. ed. X The great leaders in the Ionian school (and it is clear from the writings of Diogenes Laertius that the successions were very accurately observed) were, from the time of its foundation by Thales, to the time of Socrates, Anaximander, Anaximines, Anaxagoras, Diogenes of Apollonia, and Archelaus; the latter was the preceptor of Socrates. § The Eleatic, properly speaking, was a branch of the Italian or Pythagorean school. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 21 anity, forms one of the great partitions between the old world and the new ; and if the Greeks paved the way to the final destruction of their country, by disputing instead of fighting, by trying to settle whether the light upon Mount Tabor had been from all eternity, or had been produced by God for the purpose of the Transfiguration, this has not prevented them from soothing the disgrace of political degradation by the subtle inquiries and neverending debates of polemical divinity. Can we be altogether surprized at it in a nation, which, with organs the most acute and perceptive, possessed a language that could express every sensation ; a language, as the historian enthusiastically expresses it, so musical and prolific, that it could give a soul to the objects of sense, and a body to the abstractions of metaphysics ? — Those lofty but dangerous speculations, therefore, in which the strongest minds sometimes be- come entangled, and in which weak minds are sure to suffer shipwreck, became very soon the favourite studies of such among the Greeks, as were possessed of leisure and had a curiosity to satisfy ; and God, the Universe and Man at once divided and engrossed the whole of their attention. Their facts were few, but their disputes were long ; if they could not convince, they could at least reason : one absurdity led them to another ; but every absurdity furnished a disputation of words, and words,* even without ideas, were as the breath of life to the loquacious Athenians. The extravagant expression of Lessing would, with them, have been strictly in place : If the Almighty held truth in one hand, and in the other the investigation of truth, my choice would rest upon the latter. What is God ? the philosophers therefore first asked. He is the most ancient of all things, for he is without beginning, said Thales. He is air, said Anaximenes. He is a pure mind, said Anaxagoras. He is air and mind, said Archelaus. He is mind in a spherical form, said Democritus. He is a monad and the principle of good, said Pythagoras, He is an eternal circular fire, said Heraclitus. He is the finite and immoveable principle in a spherical form, said Parmenides ; he is one * What Plato says of the scholars of Heracleitus no doubt applied pretty well to all the philosophers. " It is as easy to talk with madmen as it is w ith them. Their writings have nothing steady in them : all are in a state of perpetual mo- tion. As for a pause in disputation and interrogation, or a quiet question or answer, it is a chance infinitely less than nothing, that you get such a thing from them. For their minds are in a perpetual state of restlessness : and woe to him that puts a question to them ! instantly comes a flight of enigmatical little words, like arrows from a quiver; and if you ask a reason of this assault, the result is another discharge, with merely a change of names. There is no doing any thing with a single one of tliem ; their only concern being, as it should seem, that nothing fixed or stable should appear either in their language or in their minds." Thesetetus, p. 130. 22 PRELIMINARY DISCOITRSE. and every thing, said Melissus and Zenon — the only eternal and infinite. These were subjects on which the profoundest mind might have disco- vered the most ample exercise for itself; but to the Greek, a vacuity was still left: Necessity, Fate and Fortune or Accident filled it up. The Universe furnished another set of disputations. What is, has ever been, and the world is eternal, said one party. The world is not eternal, but the matter is eternal, argued another party. Was this matter susceptible of forms ; of one or many ? was it water, or air, or fire ? was it an assemblage of atoms, or an infinite number of incorruptible elements ? Had this matter subsisted without movement in chaos, or had it an irregular movement ? Did the world appear by Intelligence communicating its action to it, or did God ordain it by penetrating it with a part of his essence ? Did these atoms move in the void, and was the universe the result of their fortuitous union ? Are there but two elements in nature, earth and fire, and by these are all things formed and produced; or are there four elements, whose parts are united by Love and separated by Hatred ? Causes and essences, bodies, forms and colours, production and dissolution, the great phaenomena of visible nature ; the magnitudes, figures, eclipses and phases of the two hea- venly luminaries ; the nature and division of the sky; the magnitude and situation of the earth; the sea with its ebbs and flows; the causes of thunder, lightning, winds and earthquakes — all these furnished dis- quisitions, which were pursued with an eagerness of research and in- tenseness of application, peculiar to the Greeks. Man, a compound of matter and of mind — having relations to the universe by the former, and to the Eternal Being by the latter — presented phaenomena and contra- dictions, as puzzling to the old philosophers, as the universe of which he was the abridgment. While all allowed him a soul and an intelli- gence, all differed widely in their definition of this soul or intelligence. It is always in motion and it moves by itself, said one party — it is a number in motion — it is the liarmony of the four elements — it is air, it is water, it is fire, it is blood — it is a fiery mixture of things perceptible by the intellect, which have globose shapes and the force of fire — it is a flame which emanates from the sun — it is an assemblage of fiery and spherical atoms, like those subtle particles of matter, which are seen agitated in the rays of the sun. Such were a few of the speculations, which science had devised, for employing the thoughts of active-minded men in Greece ; and if the mere enumeration of them on paper (without entering into the thousand shades and differences which had all their separate promulgators, advo- cates and abettors) have excited either a smile or a sensation of weari- someness in a reader, he may imagine what must have been their eflfects upon a man of lively and mercurial temperament, like Aristophanes, who found them crossing his path at every turn, and saw them opera- PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 23 ting with the most ridiculous effects upon the petulance of the lively,* and the conduct of the more sedate ! The hold which the philosophers properly so called according to our nomenclature, acquired over the public mind at Athens was gradual, and perhaps at all times partial ; that which a much more pernicious class of men, known since by the name of Sophists, assumed, was instantaneous, and almost universal ; the very causes which operated against the introduction of philosophy, tending to encourage and give entrance to the precepts of the sophists. The busy and stirring nature of the times, the change from monarchical to republican governments, the institution of popular assemblies, and still more the Persian contest, by making the Greeks act in bodies, where feelings were to be conci- * Plato, whose satirica] powers were not inferior to those of Aristophanes, has described both these classes of persons with great effect. In the dialogue, called Pliilebus, the Platonic Socrates is thus made to speak. " Our passion for disputation upon subjects of this kind has something in it, which is beyond the reach of decay or mortality. No sooner does one of our young men get a taste of it, than he feels delighted, as if he had discovered a treasure of wisdom. Carried away by a pleasure that amounts to madness, he finds a subject of dispute in every thing that occurs. At one time both sides of the subject are considered, and re- duced to one. At another, the subject is analysed and split into parts : himself becomes the first and principal victim of his own doubts and difiiculties: his neigh- bour, whether junior, senior, or equal, no matter, is the next suflerer; he spares not father nor mother, nor any one who will give him the loan of his ears ; scarcely animals escape him, and much less his fellow-creatures; even the foreigner has no security but the want of an interpreter at hand to go between them." (Phile- bus, p. 74.) The graver men are pursued with the same severity, and it is observ- able that Socrates addresses them in the same strain of ridicule, and nearly in the words, which twenty-three years before, the author of the Clouds had bestowed upon himself. — " From their earliest days they knew not the way to the Agora, nor can they tell where are the courts of justice, or the senatehouse, or any of the places of public meeting in the city ; as for the laws and public decrees — whether those proniulg?.ted by the voice, or those committed to writing — they have neither eyes for the one, nor ears for the other. Clubs, and meetings, and suppers, and jovial parties, where there are musicwomen, are things which never come before them even in a dream. Whether things go well or ill in the city, whether a man's ancestors, either on the male or female side, have been the cause of any calamity to him, are matters of which they are as much in the dark, as they are of the number of sands which lie by the seaside. They are even so far gone, as not to know that they are ignorant of all this. Nor does this proceed from any peculiar feeling or notion of vanity; but in fact, with a man of this kind, it is the body only which is resident in the city : his mind holds matters of this kind as trifles, or rather as things utterly without value, and is, as Pindar terms it, for ever on the wing : to what is upon the earth and below the earth, he applies the science of geometry; what is in the heavens he investigates by astronomy; he scrutinises and searches the whole universe, and knows every thing but that which is immcdidtely before him." Theaetetus, VZl. 24 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. liated, prejudices consulted, and large sacrifices of private interest to be demanded in favour of public, all conspired to bring into vogue a know- ledge more adapted to the transaction of human business, than the study of the heavens, and the properties of matter, the nature of God and the soul. The successful termination of that most important struggle, the temporary quiet which resulted from it, and the measures which were taken to provide against the recurrence of a similar event, by bringing the different states of Greece still more into contact with each other, naturally assisted the progress of this desire for intellectual improve- ment : political wisdom soon became the leading object of attainment ; and the splendid eminence to which political eloquence led, made it of essential importance to investigate and cultivate those rules which were found most effectual for working upon large bodies of men. It is impossible to peruse the interesting dialogues of Plato and Xeno- phon, without receiving the most lively impression of the strong fer- ment, which was then taking place in men's minds, and without re- cognizing in them some of the marks of that agitated fermentation of the intellect, which, whether for good or evil, is working in our own days. To be able to distinguish themselves in the General Assem- blies — to make a figure in the courts of justice — to be ingenious in putting and ready in answering questions — and what, in the now complicated affairs of Grecian politics, was becoming of still more importance, to become men of business* was the ruling object of every young man's ambition in Athens. The example of Pericles had taught experimentally the advantage of a union of the deeper knowledge of philosophyt with the rich gifts of nature ; and the splendid prize, * What was required of a man of business in the management of Athenian aflfairs, will be best learnt by perusing the fourth chapter of Aristotle's first book of Rhetoric, the admirable little dialogue between Glaucon and Socrates in Xenophon's Memorabilia, and the speech of Demosthenes de Corona. " Ha- ranguing," as Lord Bolingbroke observes, in allusion to the immense variety of business which passed through the hands of that acutest of statesmen, " was, at this time, the least part of the business of Demosthenes ; and eloquence neither the sole, nor the principal talent, as the style of writers would induce us to be- lieve, on which his success depended. He must have been master of other arts, subservient to which his eloquence was employed ; and must have had a thorough knowledge of his own state, and of the other states of Greece; of their disposi- tions, and of their interests, relatively to one another and relatively to their neighbours : I say, he must have been master of many other arts, and have pos- sessed an immense fund of knowledge, to make his eloquence in every case successful, and even pertinent and seasonable in some, as well as to direct and furnish it with matter, whenever he thought fit to employ that weapon." — Lord Bolingbroke on the Spirit of Patriotism. ] Pericles had been a scholar of Anaxagoras ; and from his intercourse with that philosopher, to whom is attributed the first conception of one Eternal, Al- mighty, and All-good Being, he is said by Plato (in Phaedro, 351 D.) to have PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. il5 which had for so many years been the reward of his profound accom- plishments, seems to have stood before the eyes of his young and ad- miring fellow-countrymen till it absolutely dazzled and blinded them. All wished to be like Perich^s — all would be at the head of public affairs — all would command men, and have their fame spread, like his fame, and that of Themistocles, from their own city to Greece, and from Greece to the remotest regions of barbarism. But how was this know- ledge to be acquired ? — For those of 5'ounger years there was no defi- ciency of masters in tliose branches, which formed the system of edu- cation in Athens; but for young men of riper age, w!io had passed through the hands of the grammarian and the music-master, and acquired that limited knowledge of arithmetic,* geometry, history, and astrono- my, whicli the then state of seicnce could supply, no establishments, like our universities,! were in being, where fiirlhcr opportunities were dorived that forcible and sublime spirit of oratory, which distinguislieJ him above all his contemporaries. For an account of Anaxagoras sec Brueker's chapter do Secta lonica, § xix. The learned German, who might have been expected, from the bulk of his enormous tomes, to have thmig^:! away all feeling, becomes almost affecting in his account of this real and most enthusiastic philo- sopher. * Plato insists very strongly upon the cullivalion of these branches of science (his love for arithmetic, in particular, is well known) in the course of instruction provided for his imaginary republic ;« but he does it less with any view to prac- tical purposes, than as means of disciplining the mind and preparing it for the power of contemplating things in their essences, the favourite object of the Pla- tonic doctrine, See the 7th hook of the Republic; also the epinomis. f Something like them did afterwards exist, in the Lyceum, the Academy, and those other establishments for the " education chainpetre" of the Athenians, of which M. de Pauw speaks in such rapturous terms. This gentleman, who often makes his readers pay for the valuable knowledge he communicates by the manner in which it is conveyed, or the remarks by which it is accompanied, has made their establishment a vehicle for throwing out a most insulting taunt upon one of our own academical institutions. M. de Pauw is not now living to know, that Oxford has adopteil a course of education which will enable her nobly to repel all such insinuations in future; and that tlie reproaches of former days are but so many tributes of applause to the wisdom and energy by which the pi;r- suits of that illustrious university are now directed and animated. — liec/ierches riiilosop/iifjues siir ks Grccs. Discours Freliminuire, p. 11. a The common term, by which readers call that work of Plato, the most bril- liant effort of his genius, as his legislation was the most perfect of his mature judgment, is here used ; but every scholar is aware, that a republic ranked in Plato's mind only one degree above a perfect despotism ; the most perfeci go- vernment, according to this great j)hilosrpher, was a monarchy, or aristocracy. It was not very likely indeed, that a person, wlio ranked a capacity for politics with poetry and prophecy, and considered all three as immediate inspirations from heaven, (in Men. 24. D.) should have drawn bis ideas of a perfect go- vernment from the fractional sovereigiis under whom it was his own miserable fate to l)c born. 4 26 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. held out to that dangerous age, when a course of instruction, fitted to fill and enlarge the mind, to form the taste, and what is still more im- portant, to perfect the morals, becomes so imperiously necessary. But where a want is felt in society, it is not long before some one starts up to supply it; and a race of men soon made their way into Athens, who, under the name of Sophists, undertook to supply all deficiencies of schools, halls, and colleges. The first person who actjuired distinction in this profession, suflicient to make his name known to posterity, and to have an influence upon the age in which he lived, was Protagoras of Abdera. Originally a faggot-maker, his mode of tying up bundles excited the attention of Democritus ; and the instructions of that philo- sopher subsequently enabled him to quit a trade, in which he might have been humbly useful, for a profession in which he unfortunately became splendidly mischievous. Tlie human mind never losing alto- gether the impression of its first employments, the inventor of the por- ter's knot became also the discoverer of the knots of language ; and accordingly, to Protagoras is ascribed the pernicious proclamation, which announced, that with him might be acquired, for a proper com- pensation, that species of knowledge, which was able to confound right and wrong, and make the worse appear the better cause: a doctrine which strikes us with amazement and confusion, but which was propa- gated with such success, that in the days of Aristophanes and Plato it appears to have excited little surprise in those who professed it, and to have been rather expected than otherwise in such persons as set them- selves up for teachers of wisdom. Bred in the school of philosophy, (if Schelling will allow us to make use of so unphilosophical an ex- pression,) which taught that tliere was nothing* fixed in nature, this flagitious sophist carried the uncertain and dangerous language of phy- sics into the business of human life, and thus poisoned the stream of truth in its very fountain and source. The direct language of Thales, Epicharmus, and Heraclcitus, and the allegorical genealogies of Homer were brought to prove, that all things being in a state of continual mo- tion, nothing actually is, and every thing is in a state of becoming : that an object therefore, considered in itself, is not one thing more than another; but that through motion, mixture, and the relation of one thing to another, the same object both ivas and appeared one thing to one person, and another thing to another. What are called heat and cold, changed their situations, it was said, even in the time of pronouncing the words; and before the enunciation was completed, heat ceased to be heat, and cold ceased to be cold — nothing, therefore, it was inferred, can be affirmed or even seen with certainty: heat is no more heat than cold, white is not more white than its opposite, knowledge is nothing * Panuenides and Melissus taught just the reverse. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 27 more than sensation, man is the measure of all things, of things existing, existing as they are, and of things non-existing, as they are not, and all thoughts are true. For every one thinks according to the impression made upon him, impressions are made by what is in motion, motion is created by agency, agency can proceed only from the things which are, and the things which are, must be true. From these sentiments it natu- rally followed, that not only what is wholesome and useful had no actual substance in themselves ; but that honour and virtue, being the beginning and aim of what is useful existed only in the opinions and habits of men. To controvert these opinions was a task of no easy kind : for the author of them maintained that it was not merely impossible to say what was false, but even to think what was false. He gravely asserted that there was no such thing as a false opinion, and that ignorance was a thing physically impossible ; and he allowed that it being impossible for a person to lie, or to hold a wrong opinion, or even to be ignorant, it fol- lowed that there was no such tiling as aberration in word, thought, or action. A puzzling question sometimes met the assertors of these opi- nions ; viz. what, in such a state of perfection, remained for themselves to teach : but this was got rid of by abuse, or by a piece of sophistry, which put an end to all disputation in limine, They maintained that there was no such thing as contradiction, or that a man could demonstrate that he had ever heard tnc man contradicting another; for, said the au- thor of these opinions, or his disciples for him, every existing thing has its own proper definitions, and these definitions are, as every thing is, and not as it is not: nobody therefore speaks the thing which is not, for nobody can saj'- the thing whicli is not in existence. They further put two cases : if each of us, said they, in defining the same thing coincide in our definition, it is plain that we both agree in opinion ; but if our definitions upon the same thing vary, it is so far from being a disagree- ment of ideas upon a subject, that neither of us can properly be said to have started the subject: since I, therefore, concluded the triumphant sophist, define one thing, and you another, what contradiction is there between us ? — May it not rather be asserted, that I speak of a tiling, and that you advance nothing about it ? and how can he who says nothing be said to contradict him who says something ? In such a town as Athens, we may easily imagine that the small wits and humbler* sophists eagerly fastened upon doctrines, so well suited * Plato has left us a most amusing specimen in his dialogue called Euthyde- mus, of the smaller craft of sophists, who confined themselves to this legerde- main of language, and who contented themselves with offering that insult, which the understanding feels at being confuted but not convicted; at finding that words are against it, and things for it ; at feeling that it cannot yield to conclusions apparently true, without violence to thai plain sense of right, which is the voice of the Divinity within us, and worth all ihc systems of logic that ever were invented. A brief analysis of this lively dialogue will contribute very 28 rRELIWIXARY DISCOURSE. to the meridian of their capacities, as those wliicli are here ascribed to the philosopher of Abdera. When the great Belial himself first began mucli to g-ive the reader a picture of the times and of tlie manner in which the education of the young Athenians of family was conducted. The impudent sophist from whom the dialogue derives its name, was one of two brothers who had gained considerable reputation by giving lessons in tactics and other branches of knowledge connected with a military life. They found it more profitable, however, to change the war of weapons for that of words, and to prepare scho- lars for the arena of the Ecclesia and courts of law, in preference to disciplining them for the field of battle. Tlie dialogue commences with one of those natural touches, wliieh give an air of reality to a picture, and which Plato, like all other men of genius, is fond of u«ing. Socrates, meeting his first and most excellent friend Criton, is questioned by him as to the person with whom he had been seen holding a disputation in the Lyceum the day before. There was a great crowd, says the worthy questionists ; so that though I advanced as closely as possible, with an eager desire to hear what was passing, I was unable to under- stand any thing distinctly. By raising my head above the rest, I got a view indeed, and as far as I could discern, it was no native of the city with whom you were disputing. This affords an opening to the dialogue : — the name of the stranger (Euthydemus,) — of his brother, who assisted in the disputation (Dio- nysodorus,) — their former profession and their present pursuits, are recorded in due order. Socrates then proceeds to answer Criton's second question, which implied a wish to know the subject of the disputation. " By the influence of some god," says the philosopher, " it was my lot to be sitting where you saw me, in the Apodyterium; (the place where the young Athenians, preparing for the exercises of the palaestra, deposited their clothes;) I had the place entirely to myself, and indeed I was just thinking of leaving it, when, as I rose up, the usual signal from the daemon took place. (What the daemon of Socrates was, whether a real spirit, a vision, a voice, an immediate inspiration from the Deity, or that inward feeling, which by continued reflections upon the past and future gives the wise man something like a prophetic sensation of what ought to be done, this is not the place to inquire.) Attentive to this impulse," continues the philosopher, "I immediately gave up my intention of going away:" — his com- pliance was duly rewarded ; for it was followed by the almost immediate en- trance of Euthydemus and Dionysodorus, attended by a large crowd of scholars. The sophists having taken two or three turns in the hypodrome, or covered porch where the wrestlers practised their exercises in winter, Cleinias, a young person in whose education Socrates took an interest, and a great deal of other .company drop in. Greetings and salutations pass between the parties: a slight skirmish of irony on the side of Socrates, and of contempluousness on the part of the sophists, soon leads the way to a more direct engagement, and an assertion made by the two sophists, that virtue could be made a subject of instruction, at last brings the parties to close quarters. Cleinias is proposed as a pupil, on whom the efficacy of this boasted annunciation may be tried, and the sophists, with the usual confidence of their class, engage to make their words perfectly good. A question accordingly is put to the young man by way of making trial 4 e^ifxfxn, as that populace was significantly and contemptuously termed in private by those who did not scruple to pan- der to its basest feelings in public. He was told, that this animal — great and strong — had certain irascible and concupiscent passions, of which it was necessary to make himself the master. He was accord- ingly taught to know in what way it was most expedient to approach this animal, and how to touch him — what made him difficult and what easy of access — how to discriminate between the tones which the Great Beast himself uttered, and the tones which, in others, either soothed or provoked him. All this, the neophyte was told, had, during a course of time, been collected into an art; in this art, he was ' assured, lay true wisdom, and this wisdom was what they (the sophists) undertook to teach. As to any discrimination of the passions of this animal, or any separation of the honourable, the good and the just, from the base, the bad and the unjust; it was what, they declared, they neither laid claim to themselves, nor expected from others ; it was their business to shape their judgments by the instincts of the animal ; calling that good, in which he delighted ; that evil, with which he was dis- pleased, and considering all as just and honourable which satisfied the necessities of nature : and what essential difference there was between that which is good in itself and good according to nature, they confessed they did not know themselves, and consequently could not communicate to others. The higher pandects of the school were now laid open to him , and it is at once curious and painful to see how early these sophists had discovered all those dangerous doctrines, which, at subsequent periods, have been made use of by bad and designing men for the subversion of society. They asserted, on all occasions, that might makes right; that * By the Eleatic Palamedes was meant Alcidamas, a pupil of Gorglas, not Zenon, as Diogenes Laertius, quoting from Plato with his too common inaccu- racy, supposes. 40 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. the property of the weak belongs to the strong, and that, whatever the law might say to the contrary, the voice of nature taught and justified the doctrine. They proclaimed that the only wise persons were those who aspired to the direction of public affairs, and who were slopped in this attempt by no other consideration than the measure of their capa- city; and they added, that those who, without any command over them- selves, could acquire a command over others, had a right to have their superiour talent rewarded by possessing more than otliers ; for tempe- rance, self-restraint, and a dominion over the passions and desires, were set down by them as marks of dulness and stupidity, only calculated to excite mirth and derision. They asserted with confidence, that na- ture itself made it both just and honourable, that he who wished to live happil)', ought to permit his desires as large a sway as possible, and in no way to restrain them : they bargained indeed for the possession of courage and political wisdom in their scholars ; but once in possession of these, a man, in their opinion, was at liberty to administer to his passions in all other respects, and to leave nothing unindulged, which could contribute to their gratification. They declared, that those who attached disgrace to this doctrine, did it only from a sense of shame at wanting the means to gratify their own passions : and their praises of moderation they asserted to be mere hypocrisy; and to proceed solely from the wish of enslaving better men than themselves. With the same power of self-indulgence, said these flagitious liars, these assertors of moderation would pursue the same path as those who were now the objects of their animadversions : — they concluded, therefore, that it was ridiculous in those who were above restraint, to lay a restraint upon themselves, and they proclaimed in the most unqualified terms, that luxury, intemperance and licentiousness, were alone virtue and happi- ness, and that all other declarations were mere specious pretences — compacts contrary to nature — the triflings of men, who deserved no manner of consideration ! The sacred principles of justice were treated with a contempt equally daring. They often began with the bold definition that justice itself was nothing but the interest of the strongest ; that the masterpiece of injustice was to appear a man of virtue without being really one : and they proceeded to prove (and in a town like Athens, the demonstration perhaps was not difficult) that on all occasions the just man came off worse than the unjust. In the mutual compacts of private life, said they, the just man is always a loser, and the unjust a gainer. In public affairs, when a contribution is to be made, the one with equal property always contributes less than the other; whereas, when a disbursement is to be made, the former receives nothing, and the latter is a conside- rable gainer. If both are in office, one mischief at least happens to the just man; his private affairs go to ruin from being neglected, and the public give him no redress, merely because he is a just man ; he becomes PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 41 odious besides to his relations and his friends, because he will not, for their service, overstep the bounds of right; whereas, to the unjust man, the very reverse, said they, is the case. To paint this more forcibly, they drew the picture of a tyranny, where the unjust man was in the highest state of felicity, the voluntarily just in the greatest state of de- pression ; and they proved that the former, though outraging every rule of humanity, was loaded with praises, not only those who were con- scious of his crimes, but even those who had suffered by them, consi- dering him a happy man : for if injustice, added they, is ever blamed, the blame proceeds, not from the fear of committing it, but from the fear of suffering by it. Improving upon these notions, they declared, that to be able to commit an injury, was in itself a blessing, receive an injury was in itself an evil ; but that there was more of ill in receiving, than there was of good in committing, and that to set this right, was the origin and object of legislation. Justice, therefore, they considered as the medium between the greatest of blessings, that of committing wrong with impunity, and the greatest evil, which consists in not being able to revenge an injury received; and hence, according to them, was derived the common attachment to justice, not as being a blessing in itself, but because persons in a capacity to hurt others, oblige them to consider it as such : for he, they continued, who has power in his hands, and is really a man, would never submit to sucli a convention: — it would, indeed, be complete folly to do it. Give the good man and the bad man, they trium- phantly concluded, power to act as they please ; present them with rings like that of Gyges, which should make them invisible, and what will be the consequence ? The virtuous man would soon be found treading the very same path as the villain, and if he should be so " adamantine" as to act otherwise, he would be considered as the most pitiful and stupid of his species : in public, indeed, every one would eulogize his virtues ; but this would be done with a design of deceiving others, and in the fear of risking fortune, if a contrary course were pursued. Such were some of the doctrines which, advanced with all the powers of dialectic skill, and dropping upon a soil too well fitted by an imper- fect education for their reception, confused the intellects and perverted the notions of the young Athenians. But the poisonous chalice was not yet full. — As some compunctious visiting of nature might interfere, and the dread of present or future retribution (that witness of himself, which the Deity has left in all ages,) might hinder the pupil from giving due effect to these pernicious precepts, the high doctors of this infernal school now took him in hand ; and in this moment of wavering and irresolution, they, with a hot iron, for ever seared the conscience, which still retained some faint marks of tenderness and sensibility. The opi- nions, which he had sucked in with his nurse's and his mother's milk, the opinions which from the mouths of the same persons he had heard conveyed in the shape of serious arguments, or amusing fables, the 6 42 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. opinions, which he saw evinced in the numerous and imposing sacrificial rites of his country, all these opinions he was told were false ; and he was required to abjure them ; he, who had been witness to the victims offered to the gods by his parents, and to the prayers and supplications made to the same gods in behalf of themselves and their children, with an earnestness and a warmth which showed the conviction of their own minds that there was some superintending Power ; he, who in the pros- trations and adorations of Greeks and barbarians, at the rising and set- ting of the two great luminaries, had either seen or heard that this per- suasion was common to all people — he was now told to give up all these notions, fitted only for the capacities of dreaming ignorance and anile superstition. He was assured, in broad open day, in the sight of that sun which he saw rising every day to run his glorious course, and in the face of that earth which he beheld covered with flowers as well as fruit, that of three things he might console himself with one ; that there were no gods, or that if there were, they took no cognizance of human affairs, or that if they did, their connivance could be gained, and their vengeance appeased, by returning to them some of the lowest of their own gifts ; — a bull, an ox, a sheep, a little incense, or a few grains of salt. By what arguments these doctrines were supported we have neither time nor patience to mention ; and the arguments by which they were refuted, it is not surely necessary, at this time of day, to repeat ; but one argument, however uselessly it was urged, is too ho- nourable to human nature to be altogether omitted ; and some among ourselves, may, perhaps, mutatis mutandis, receive benefit from the ideas of an unassisted and uninspired heathen. " My son," (this better voice whispered to the unfortunate victim of superficial education and devilish sophistry,) " you are yet young : time will make an alteration in your opinions ; and of many, which you now strongly maintain, you will hereafter advocate the very reverse : wait, therefore, till time has made you a judge of matters, so deep and so important in their nature. For that which you now think of no consequence, is, in fact, the con- cern of the very highest importance ; viz. the direction of life to good or bad purposes, by corresponding investigations into the nature of the heavenly powers. One thing, and that not trivial, I can at least venture, in all the confidence of truth, to assure you respecting them ; the opinions which you now entertain are not solitary opinions, first originaed by you or your friends ; they are opinions which, at all times, have found advocates, more or less in number ; but I speak the language of experi- ence when I say that not one of those who in their youth had been led to think that there were no gods, has found his old age consistent in opinion with that of his more juvenile years." Alas ! to many of these persons such an old age never came : and if the natural consequences of these damnable lessons sometimes brought moments of anguish and remorse, the effect of such feelings, when the great doctrine of Repent- PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 43 ance had not yet been promulgated, was only to plunge the pupil into deeper sins, that he might get rid of the terrors of an upbraiding con- science ! In laying open, at such length, the manners and the doctrines of the sophists, the reader may seem to have been drawn from the purpose for which these remarks were designed : but humour depends for its relish very frequently upon knowledge — knowledge not acquired at the moment, but knowledge fixed in the mind, and requiring little expla- nation ; for nobody, says a French critic, laughs, when there is need of an explanation to tell him why he ought to laugh. It is only an inti- mate acquaintance with the state of manners, and the habits of society in the upper classes of society in Athens, which can give the reader a full idea of the Clouds of Aristophanes. It is then only that the full force of many of his single happy words can be understood, or tliose images raised in the mind which mere words are sometimes calculated to light up. But this purpose must still lie by a little longer. Some doubt has been thrown on tlie veracity of the author, from whose wri- tings these remarks have chiefly been suggested or collected ; and an agreeable* compiler, well known to scholars, would wish us to believe, that the master of the Academy acted the same part by the sophists of his day, as Aristophanes did by the great originator of the Grecian moral philosophy. The Dialogues of Plato do, certainly, by the introduction of living characters, speaking freely and unreservedly their most inti- mate thoughts, approach nearest of anything which antiquity has left us to the modern novel, that dangerous species of literature, which has torn open all the recesses of the heart, and left none of those sanctuaries unopened into which a person's own thoughts should fear to penetrate. But the romance-novel, that elliptic figure, within whose circumference any man's character may be drawn for the purposes of utter distortion, because reality and fiction being its admitted generating axes, one line must be made to augment, precisely as the other decreases, this was a species of literary guilt, left for the invention of our own days; and it is to be wished that it had begun with a sex, on whom it would have been less ungracious to bestow the reprobation, which such an inroad upon the peace and security of society deserves. Without adverting, then, to the difference of manners between the Greeks and ourselves, without showing that Athenaius, in attacking the character of Plato for veracity, has left his own reputation for truth in a most awkward pre- dicament ; after admitting, in its fullest extent, the literary jealousy of Plato, which could bear no rival near his throne, it will be sufficient to say that we possess other means of establishing the truth of his obser- vations. If such dark and malignant spirits, as Plato describes, had been at work with such doctrines as he details, their effects would be * Athenaeus, lib. xi. 44 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. pretty visible in the annals of the times ; for what is history but opinion converted into fact ? and how read we ? what says the great, the match- less contemporary chronicler ? "About this time," says Thucydides, (and he is speaking of the period which immediately preceded the re- presentation of the Clouds,) " about this time," says Thucydides, (and his declarations may be given nearly in the words of a translator, to whom something might be added on the side of elegance, but whose closeness and fidelity few can hope to surpass) " the received value of names imposed for signification of things, began to be changed into arbitrary: for inconsiderate boldness was counted truehearted manliness ; prudent deliberation, a handsome fear ; modesty, the cloak of cowardice ; to be wise in everything, to be lazy in everything. A furious sudden- ness was reputed a point of valour. To readvise for the better security, was held for a fair pretext of tergiversation. He that was fierce, was always trusty ; and he that contraried such a one, was suspected. He that laid a snare, if it took, was a wise man ; but he whose forecast discovered a snare laid, a more dangerous man than he : he that had been so prudent, as not to need to do the one or the other, was said to be a dissolver of society, and one that stood in fear of his adversary. In brief, he that could outstrip another in the doing of an ill act, or that could persuade another thereto, that never meant it, was commended. To be kin to another, was less binding than to be of his Society or Company; because these were ready to undertake the most hazardous enterprizes, and that without any pretext. For Societies* were not made upon prescribed laws of profit, but for rapine, contrary to the laws established. And as for mutual trust amongst them, it was confirmed not so much by oaths or divine law, as by the communication of guilt. And what was well advised of their adversaries, they received with an eye to their actions, to see whether they were too strong for them, or not, and not ingenuously. To be revenged was in more request, than never to have received injury. And for oaths (when any were) of re- concilement, being administered in the present necessity, they were of force to such as had otherwise no power : but upon opportunity, he that first durst, thought his revenge sweeter by the trust, than if he had taken the open way. For they did not only put to account the safeness of that course, but having circumvented their adversary by fraud, they assumed to themselves withal, a mastery in point of wit. And dishonest men for the most part are sooner called able, than simple men honest. And men are ashamed of this title, but take a pride in the other. The cause of all this is desire to rule, out of avarice and ambition, and the zeal of contention from those two proceeding. Thus was wickedness * By societies are here meant companies united under certain laws for the more profitable management of their trades or arts. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 45 on foot in every kind, throughout all Greece, and sincerity (whereof there is much in a generous nature) was laughed down."* A Tragedy of manners, thus fearful, wanted a Gracioso to relieve some of its more sombre scenes, and the character was supplied in Aristophanes. To dispel by the powerful weapon of ridicule these mists of errour — to give a finished picture of a plain unlettered man as he was likely to come from the handsf of the sophists — to rescue the young men of family from the hands of such flagitious preceptors, and restore them to that noble simplicity of manners, which had prevailed in Greece in the time of Homer, and which had not entirely disappeared even in the days of Herodotus, was unquestionably the object of the Clouds ; — it was a task of no ordinary kind, but the author has accomplished his purpose in one of those immortal dialogues, which, wrapped up in his own rich, mellifluous and inimitable versification, remains, to the moderns, like so many of the other great works of antiquity, at once an object of ad- miration| and despair. If the mode§ in which this admirable dialogue was conveyed, be such as to detract in our eyes, at least in some degree, from its merits, it must be remembered, that the persons for whose service it was intended, were not likely to be present at the recital of it, and that the reproof could only be dealt at second hand through the medium of a clever, but noisy, conceited, and riotous mob, who required some compensation for having the merriment of their bacchanalian anni- versary disturbed by satires upon the system of public education. — It now remained for the author to give a central figure to his piece ; and the same regard to the quality of his audience seems to have guided him also in this stage of his progress. * Hobbes's Trans, of Thucydides, lib. iii. 188. I A picture of this kind is admirably furnished in the Clouds, commencino- in the original, at v. 438. \. Wieland enthusiastically observes (and the author of Oberon has a right to be heard on a matter of taste, notwithstanding his mad inconsistencies on matters of opinion) that the imaginations of Lucian, Rabelais, Cervantes, Lopez de Vega, Sterne and Swift united, could not have produced a happier scene than this one, in which the embodied Loga', the representatives of the two struggling and opposing sets of opinions in Athens, on the subjects of religion, manners, morals, music, etc., are introduced upon the stage. § There can be no doubt, from the words of the scholiast, that the Log«, of which Mr Cumberland's terms Dicaeus and Adieus, give so very inadequate a representation, were exhibited to the audience as two fighting cocks, in large wicker cages. Spurs of course would he provided them; and if the apologue of Prodicus, which Xenophon has so beautifully dressed up, and of which Lowth has given so manly and nervous a version, was then in being, the humour was heightened by that spirit of parody, which seems to have been so agreeable to the Athenians. See on both these subjects the German Attic Museum. Zwey- ter Band. Erlauterung II. 46 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. About the time when the play called the Clouds was brought before a public audience, a person was seen in all the streets and public places of Athens, whose appearance, manners and doctrines equally tended to excite observation. If not a sophist himself, he was at least seen con- tinually in the company of the sophists ; and, as he made no scruple to practise upon them the arts which they practised upon others, it is no wonder that an almost general opinion should have considered him as one of the profession ; as a sophist more honest indeed than the rest, but in talent, in vanity and selfconceit surpassing them all. Like the sophists and philosophers, he had given himself deeply and unremittedly to physical researches : and in a temperament naturally melancholy, it had produced such an effect upon his countenance and manners, that by the gayer part of his fellow citizens, who wanted opportunities of know- ing him more intimately, an introduction to his society was considered as something like venturing into the sombre cavern of Trophonius. And certainly there were not wanting reasons for forming such an opinion. Wrapt up in profound reveries, the ordinary functions of nature seemed sometimes suspended in him — the vicissitudes of day and night passed unobserved, the necessary refections of rest and food were neglected, and he seemed to have derived from his own experience the reproach which he sometimes cast upon the other philosophers, that their native town had only possession of their bodies, but that the air was the chosen habitation of their minds. The pride of knowledge communi- cated a consequence which contrasted rather ridiculously with the hu- mility of his external appearance ; his air was stern, his step was lofty, and his eyes, if not fixed upon the heavens, were thrown around with an appearance of conscious importance. He was rather ostentatious in proclaiming that his father had been a statuary, his mother a midwife ; and he explained, in language highly ingenious, but rather more at length, perhaps, than was consistent with good taste, and certainly in terms which only a degraded state of female estimation would allow to be called decent, that the profession, which his mother had practised, was that which he also pursued ; with this difference, that he performed for the intellect, what she had done for the body ; and that while she confined her attention to the female sex, his obstetric services had been devoted exclusively to the male. In his more convivial moments he had a term by which he chose to characterize his pursuit, that requires still more circumlocution in mentioning ; it will be sufficient to say, that it came nearest to that office, which is considered the most degrading that one man can perform for another ; and he who had accidentally seen the author of it, coquetting with a graybearded brother in philoso- phy, and aping the manners of a courtezan who denies, only to be courted to do, what she wishes, might have been justified in thinking, till circumstances had better informed him, that the pretended office was not merely assumed for the purposes of momentary pleasantry. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 47 By whatever name, however, he chose to term his vocation, certain it was, that no man could be more assiduous in the prosecution of it. "Whoever was the disputant, or Avhaiever the subject of conversation, the discourse finally fell upon the head of the person with whom he was conversing. Armed with a divine commission, as he pretended, for that purpose, and himself under the immediate direction of a super- natural being, not perfectly naturalized in the theology of his country, every man was questioned by him in turn, and found no respite, till he gave a complete account of himself: — what was his present and what had been his past mode of life — and once upon this topic, said one who knew him well, there is no hope of escape, till you have been put to the touchstone torture, and your Avhole life sifted to the bottom. So strong was this passion, that the attachment to rural scenes, Avhich pre- vailed so strongly in most of his fellow-citizens, in him seemed a feeling almost extinct — he was a stranger to the environs of Athens, and was scarcely ever seen outside the walls. He could gain no instruction, he declared, from fields and trees, and nothing but a book could entice him to the banks of the Ilyssus, or that more beautiful stream, where Venus quenched her thirst, and in return blew over it the sweetest breath of the Zephyrs, and sent the Loves to be the companions of wisdom. Man was his game ; and from man he never wished to be absent ; but the passion was by no means reciprocal : a catechist so inquisitorial was not always agreeable, and the presence of the philosopher either created a solitude where he went, or if he collected an audience, it was among the idle young men, who took a malicious pleasure in his cutting remarks, and who im- mediately left him to practise upon others the lessons which they had just received. In a town where the personal appearance of the male sex ex- cited more comments and observation than the female, even the exterior of this person was calculated to fix the attention of many, who were not disposed to penetrate beyond it; and whatever merriment was excited on this subject, it must be owned that himself was ever the first to set the joke afloat. His eyes (to use the words in which he was accustomed to draw his own figure, and in which it will be necessary to follow him, for purposes that will appear hereafter) stood so forward in his head, that they enabled him not only to see straight before him, but even to look sideways ; and he used in consequence to boast, that himself and a crab were, of all other animals, the two best adapted for vision. As his eyes took in a larger field of vision, so his nostrils, from standing wide open, were formed to embrace a larger compass of smell. His nose, too, from its extreme depression, had in like manner its advantages; for, had it been aquiline, instead of what it was, it might have stood like a wall of separa- tion between his eyes, and thus have obstructed their vision. His mouth and his lips were equally subjects of pleasantry with him, and the latter, with reference to subjects, to which the decorousness of modern manners does not admit much allusion. With a view to reduce the periphery 48 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. of his body, which certainly was not very exact in its proportions, he practised dancing, and that down to a very advanced period of life ; not merely to the occasional discomfiture of serious reflection in his pupils, but even to the excitement of a doubt in them, whether their master was quite correct in his senses : — to close this, not very agreeable part of the subject: — when these pupils likened his whole exterior to that of the Sileni, no doubt of the truth was ever expressed, and no umbrage taken as at a supposed afl'ront. Though little distinguished for beauty himself, some of the handsomest young men of Athens were seen con- tinually in his train : and while they did not scruple to take the utmost liberty in expressing their opinion upon his deformity, he did not per- haps altogether find his advantage in gazing upon their beauty; for it led to the objection, which the warmest of his admirers either did not attempt to deny, or found it necessary to palliate, that it led him some- times to clothe the noblest operations and aspirations of the mind in the language of the senses, that it engaged him to arrive at mental through corporeal excellence, and made it appear, that the presence of the beau- tiful Agathon, or the interesting Autolycus was necessary, before the philosopher could arrive at the essential beauty, the *wto x^y mto, his reveries about which must have become sometimes a little fatiguing to the most admiring of his auditors. With these persons, who were never many in number, of whom the more ambitious deserted their master as soon as they had gained the object which brought them into his society, and others of whom left him to form schools, whose names have since been synonymous with sophistry,* the coarsest effrontery,! and the most undisguised voluptuousness,! the greatest part of his time was spent; for the civil duties which occupied the hours of others were avocations which he chose wholly to decline : he never made part of the General Assembly; he never frequented the Courts of Law; and the awkward manner in which he performed the externals of a senator, when necessity or accident brought him into the situation, showed that neither practice nor reflection had made him acquainted with the duties of the office. Even that duty which seemed peculiarly connected with his office of a public teacher, that of committing to writing the result of his studies, or giving a lasting habitation to those important disputations in which he was continually engaged, was a task which he declined, and for which he had framed reasons, which, however satisfactory to himself, have by no means been equally so to those who have lived after him. To himself, however, one very satisfactory consequence resulted from these derelictions, as some did not hesitate to call them, of the duties of a citizen : it left him the most unlimited leisure for * The Megarian school under Eucleid. I The Cynic school under Antisthenes. ^ The Cyrenaic school under Aristippus. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 4^ frequenting, what seemed his pieculiar delight, the scliools of the sophists, and engaging in disputation with those fallacious pretenders to universal knowledge. If there were some points in which the sophists and him- self had a certain similarity, there were many of a trifling, and still mor6 of a serious nature, in which tliey were diametrically opposite. While the sophists went clad in magnificent garments, he appeared in the most plain and simple apparel. The same coat served him for winter and summer, and he preserved the oldfashioned manner of his country in going always barefooted : he frequented the baths* but rarely, and never indulged in the usual luxury of perfumes. While the sophists confined themselves to thie sons of the wealthy and the gi'eat, and were therefore known to them and them only, he did not disdain to frequent the mean- est of the artisans, to converse with tliem in their own language, and on topics with which they were most familiar. There was even a class in society still more degraded, which he did not scruple occasionally to visit, and to evince, by his instructions, that there was no class of Society whose pursuits had Avliolly escaped his scrutinizing eye. The effect of these visits was very evident in his language, arid those who felt themselves annoyed by his raillery, or pressed by his acutencss, did not fail to throw into his face tlie shipwrights, the cobblers, the carpenters and weavers, with whom his habits of intercourse were not unfrequent, and from whom he was so fond of drawing those maxims and comparisons, which confounded the class of persons, to whosd annoyance and discomfiture he seems to hiive devoted the greatest por- tion of his time. It is the language of the chivali-ous ages, which would best do justice to this part of his character: and the knight, locked up in complete armour, and ready to run a-tilt with the first person he met, is the completest image of tliis philosopher, pi-eparirig to encounter the sophists, at once apparently his enemies and his rivals. Every age, however, has expressions and images in which it cail stamp any strong feeling ; and the sophists, without the power of recur* ring to the language of knighthood, had many significant terms, by which they could express the Quixotism of this redoubted opponent. They compared him at first to the Spartans, Avho, if any one approached their palestrae or places of public exercise, obliged the intruder to make choice between immediately retiring or joining in the exercises of which he was a spectator. But they recollected that this was conceding too much, and they corrected their position by placing their rival in the same rank with the Scirons and Antaeusses, who let no passer-by escape them without a previous encounter. To ask questions or to answer * Arrian. p]pict. do Mundit. accounts for this abstinence, by a reason, which might have justified Cujas the celebrated lawyer, Alexander the Great, and Lord Herbert of Clicrl)ury, in a similar j)icco of abstinence : viz. a peculiar sweetness of body, which rendered ablution unnecessary, and perfumes superfluous. 7 50 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. tliem — to convict or to be convicted — were, in his own words, the great purposes for which men should meet together ; and a person, who had decreed that his life should be a complete logomachy, could not have come to the contest better prepared ; nor, where words were to be the weapons of warfare, could any man draw them from a better-provided armoury. That a person possessed of so powerful a weapon should sometimes have been a little too much delighted with the use of it, is no subject of wonder. His hearers described the effect of it upon them- selves as resembling the effects of witchery and enchantment : they compared it to the touch of the torpedo, which causes a numbness in the faculties. Much was affirmed by him, and little proved — both sides of a question were alternately taken, and the result left upon his hearers' minds was, that he himself was in doubt, and only excited doubts in others. The sophists, indeed, by the manner in which they were handled, were made, especially in hot weather, to perspire more copi- ously than, perhaps, was agreeable ; for their subtleties were met with niceties still more acute than their own, and they were entrapped into admissions of which they did not foresee the consequence ; but their falsehoods were also combated with positions which he who advanced them would have been unwilling to have had considered as decidedly his own, and in pursuing them into their dark recesses his own gigantic powers could not altogether save him from the reproach which he cast upon another : " the best divers only should venture to plunge into a sea of such prodigious depth." Such was the person whom Aristo- phanes selected to be the hero of his Clouds. Those who are acquaint- ed with Grecian affairs only through the medium of history, will not, perhaps, recognize in this picture the celebrated son of Sophroniscus ; and, were no other traits added to the above portrait, men of deeper research might justly complain that it showed no reluctance to exhibit the darker shades, and much inability to describe the brighter parts of a philosopher, whose virtues and whose intellect, in spite of some drawbacks still more serious* than any which have hitherto been men- * See nearly the whole of the fifth book of the Republic. It was not possible to allude to this part of the writings of Plato and not immediately drop the mask, which, perhaps, has been worn too long in the preceding description of the son of Sophroniscus ; but whoever rises from the perusal of this stain upon a work, otherwise almost faultless, will feel it necessary to relieve his own feelings by an indignant protest against this portion of its contents. In this lying book it is announced that a woman's virtue will serve her instead of a robe, that the useful is the measure of the honourable, and that there is nothing shameful but what is hurtful ; and upon these flimsy pretences the same outrage upon the feelings, by the exhibition of the sex in the exercises of the palaestra, as obtained in Sparta, is recommended for practice in a Utopian form of government. In this absurd book man is considered as an animal, whose actions, on the tenderest points, are to be determined by the pleasure of the law ; as a physical agent, PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 51 tioned, have been justly allowed to form an epoch in the history of man. Having thus got his central figure, the attention of the author was next turned to that most peculiar part of the ancient drama, the Chorus. It has been remarked by W. Schlegel as one of the peculiarities of Aristophanes, that he is fond of adopting a metaphor literally, and ex- hibiting it in this way before the eyes of the spectators.* As a person given to abstraction and solitary speculation is proverbially said to have his head in the clouds, it was but another step, therefore, in the poet's creative mind to make the clouds the chorus of his piece ; as of the person, whose abstractions and reveries seemed to make him most conversant with them, he had formed the hero of the piece. By this contrivance the author wove into his performance the mob (no incon- siderable body in Athens) who assisted the sophists in the perversion of the public mind — whose proceedings in those contracts, where nature tells us our own will ought to have the greatest share, are made to depend solely upon the will of the ma- gistrate. In this most unfeeling book all the great ties of our condition — paren- tal, filial, and connubial — are proposed to be severed at a blow; nature, it appears, having made a mistake in investing us with such feelings ; or the phi- losopher forgetting that our feelings become enfeebled in proportion as they are carried beyond their limits, and that they may be carried so far as to become less than nothing. In this g'lH/i/ book lying is made a statutable, constitutional branch of duty in the first magistrates of the state — the promiscuous concubinage of the sexes is established as a fundamental law of society, and exposition of children, suppression and abortion, are set down, not among things permitted, but among things enjoined. There is a respect due to the pul)Hc ear, and it becomes us to proceed no farther: the feelings of sickness and of loathing, which some further matter in the book would infallibly excite, may well be spared. And all this is to take place in a state which is set up as a model of perfection ! And, as if to add mockery to insult, the propositions are made with pleasantry and en badinanf; and the promulgator of them charitably demands, that, if they cannot be reduced to practice, their author may be put upon a foot- ing with those idle persons who entertain themselves agreeably with their reve- ries, and feed upon them merely for the purpose of dissipating the ennui of solitude ! Upon whom ti\e guilt of them rests — upon the teacher or the scholar — it is not now possible to say ; they are put into the mouth of Socrates by Plato, and we should hardly think that he could have ventured upon ascribing such opinions to his master, if there had not been some authority for such a proceeding. * All early literature, in fact, is fond of these associations. We may turn to every page almost of the Inferno of Dante for examples. The schismatics, in the 28th Canto, who walk " Fessi nel volto dal mento al ciuffetto," and the headless trunk, which bears its head in the hand, " Perch' i' parti' cosi giunie persone," occur instantly. 52 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. The fortunetellers, Quacks, medicinemongers, bards bombastlcal, Chorusprojectors, starinterpreters, And wonderworking cheats. The effect of this personification in the original theatre was no doubt very striking. A solemn invocation calls down the Clouds from their ethereal abode — their approach is announced by thunder — they chaunt a lyric ode as they descend to the earth, and, after wakening attention by a well managed delay, they are brought personally on the stage as a troop of females, " habited," says Mr Cumberland, " no doubt in cha- racter, and floating cloudlike in the dance." All this we can easily conceive ; but a more curious part of their duty must be left to be sup- plied (and that but very imperfectly) by the imagination. Recitation was not the only part which the chorus had to perform ; a great share of their office lay in their feet, as well as in their tongue, and both author and actor were expected to be great proficients, the former in the composition, the latter in the practice, of those movements and evolutions which, as we find Aristotle classing them with poetry, music and painting, and Lucian terming them a science of imitation and exhibition, which explained the conceptions of the mind, and certified to the organs of sense things naturally beyond their reach, we may easily conceive to have consisted of something more than the elegant movements which now go under the name of dancing. Had the trea- tises of Sophocles and Aristocles on the subject of the chorus come down to us, or had those statues not been lost from which ideas of the attitudes of the ancient dancers might have been collected, (for every movement of the body, we are given to understand by Athenaeus, was observed, in order to collect those gestures which might afford a concert for the eye, modulated upon that which was at the same time presented to the ear,) we might have spoken with more confidence on what must now remain a subject full of perplexity and obscurity. As all dancing, however, among the Greeks was of the mimetic kind, whatever was the nature of the tragic dance, we may be sure that the comic dance stood in the same relation of parody to it, as the comedy itself of the ancients did to their tragedy ; and to have enjoyed the mimetic movements of the cordax, or dance of comedy, we ought to have witnessed in the tragic* chorus those movements, whose general name (emmeleia) im- * The author understood this best from witnessing, in the beautiful theatre at Stutgard, a representation of Schiller's Bride of Messina. It was substituting, indeed, the ear for the eye, and sound in the place of motion ; but the senses easily transfer their feelings from one to another. In that rnost splendid testi- mony of Schiller's genius, modelled, I need scarcely observe, upon the drama of the ancients, and which might, in many of its parts, be mistaken for a reco- vered piece of antiquity, the Chorus makes a very distinguished figure, and, on PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 53 plies accordance and a modulated harmony in the play of the characters. How far this mimetic province of the dance was called into action by the CHORUS of the Clouds, what steps were used in their parabases to give effect to the rhythm,* what pauses in the metre* were supplied by action, what gestures at once aided and gave life to the music, and in what manner the metaphysical speculations of the sophists, which, resting on no ground of experience, floated about in the kingdom of possibilities without any definite shape or body — how far all this was ridiculed by appropriate movements and evolutions, must now be left to the fancy: we may be sure, however, that the fruitful mind of the poet who invented one of the most powerful and graceful metresf in the Greek language, would not be deficient in giving effect to his mental creations by all the effects of scenic decoration, and all the additions of costume, music, and dancing.l In this union of talents lay the great a person conversant vvitl\ the writings of antiquity, it cannot fail to make a most powerful impression. The effect of a number of human voices iijitonating the same sentiments, in the same words, the same tone, the same inflection of voice, and in the same modulated cadences, is something which, to be well understood, must have been heard. The prophetic forebodings of the chorus, towards the close of the piece — their IVeh .' Wehe .' Wche .' IVehe.' have not yet departed from my ears ; and I have never since read a chorus or parabasis of Aristophanes without feeling the humour increased tenfold, by the reflection, that on the Greek stage its native wit would have been heightened by the triple parody of diction, sound and motion. * As mistakes are apt to occur in the use of these two words, the following definitions of them, from the acute author of " Philological Inquiries" are sub- joined. Rhythm difiors from metre in as much as rhythm is proportion, applied fto any motion whatever : metre is proportion, applied to the motion of words spoken. Thus in the drumming of a march or the dancing of a hornpipe, there is rhythm, though no metre ; in Dryden's celebrated ode there is metre as well as rhythm, because the poet with the rhythm has associated certain words. And hence it follows, that though all metre is rhythm, yet all rhythm is not metre. f The Aristophanic tetrameter. In its happy mixture of anapestic and spon- daic feet, this metre combines a degree of strength and playfulness which no other language can hope to reach. It is the want of a metre of this kind, which makes every scholar feel a sensible deficiency in Mr Cumberland's translation of the Clouds, where it not only tends to destroy the poetical effect, but assists in giving a wrong idea of the feelings under which the original play was prima- rily composed. X Those who are conversant with the works of antiquity (and more particu- larly with the writings of Plato, Aristotle and Lucian) are well aware, that each of these subjects might afford matter for a treatise and not for the scanty notices which the limits of this publication allow. On the subject of the latter more particularly, even the graceful dancer (Dcshayes,) whose retirement has, now for some years, made as great a void in tlie attractions of the Operatic ballet, as 54 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. merit and difficulty of the ancient dramatists ; and in this lies the de- pressing part of those who endeavovir to give the public an idea of their works by translation. Conscious of what ought to be done, and what they know never can be done, the unfinished appearance of their labours throws a damp upon their toils, and they relinquish a work in despair, where they feel that their happiest efforts can only be a species of galvanism, giving motion to a muscle, to a leg, to an arm, but im- potent and powerless to breathe the breath of life into the whole. We have now gone through what appears to have been the object of this very singular drama, the Clouds, and the process by which it was moulded into the form it now bears. The author might surely be par- doned for supposing that a piece thus carefully and laboriously con- structed would have met with a reception far more flattering than had attended any of his former plays. We know, however, from his own confession, which is certainly more valid than Madame Dacier's conjec- tures, that this was not the case ; that the prize of victory was assigned to the Wine Flask of Cratinus, (that Cratinus who collected his declin- ing powers to show a youthful and not altogether forbearing rival, that he could still contest the palm with him,) and to the Connus of the cold and spiritless Ameipsias. This was sufficiently mortifying ; and the author, by his frequent complaints, showed that he felt it to be so. Had Aristophanes been aware that the loss of his reputation with a great portion of posterity would also be the price of the exhibition, we must suppose him to have been without the feelings of a man, if we imagine that the temporary defeat at Athens could have been anything in the balance to him, compared with the severe judgment which mo- dern writers in general have passed upon the author of the Clouds. Upon what ground these decisions took place, and whether the poet's contemporaries acted towards him with candour, or posterity with a just knowledge of the subject, it now remains for us to consider. It may, upon investigation, appear that the wit of the Clouds may be relished without diminishing any of the respect justly due to Socrates, and that Aristophanes, for this piece, as well as others, is more entitled to our gratitude than common readers are at all aware of. It will be as well to begin with the failure of the piece at the time of its exhibition. When we talk of a piece failing in our own country, everybody knows what is meant ; the taste of the writer and the taste of the audi- ence, it is immediately understood, were at variance, and the sentiments of the latter, pretty unequivocally expressed, obliged the former to withdraw the obnoxious object from further obtrusion upon public that of the most accomplished of actors has done in the classic and more dignified departments of the drama, even he would be startled were we to mention the twentieth part of what was expected by the ancients from a perfect dancer and mime. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 55 notice. This does not altogether answer to the case of a dramatic failure among the Greeks. With them, a contributor to tlieir scenic exhibitions (and we shall betray an entire ignorance of the manners of antiquity, if our imaginations place him, altogether, in the same scale of estimation with those who devote their talents to the same difficult pursuit in modern times) had two or three distinct sets of enemies to encounter- — the archon, with whom lay the power of rejecting his piece in the first instance ; the audience, to whom, after permission obtained from the ruling magistrate, it was presented ; and thirdly, the critical overseers ("S't*'.) whose business it was, under the restrictions of a so- lemn oath, to adjudge the prize of victory, (a victory* sought with an eagerness of competition of which we can scarcely form a conception,) to what they thought the most distinguished of the competing pieces. The audience and the umpires, it will easily be imagined, were not always unanimous in their opinion ; the judges sometimes favouring, and the spectators condemning, or the latter applauding and the former disapproving. Which party favoured the Clouds? If we listen to iElian, whose testimony however stands amid such a tissue of false- hoods, that his opinion is scarcely worth a reference, the Clouds ap- peared so delicious to the ears of the audience, that they applauded as no audience ever applauded before ; they cricdf out tiiat the victory belonged to Aristophanes, and they ordered the judges to inscribe his name accordingly. If this story be true, the fall of the piece, which consisted in not gaining the dramatic crown, must be ascribed to the presiding critics, and we should have to account why they were at variance with the audience : and this would be no very difficult task. How many:|: the judges were on these occasions, and how they were * The more serious excitements to victory are inserted in a note, in the co- medy of the Knights, which describes the office of Choregus; a superb banquet, given by the triumphant tribe to their successful poet, it may be presumed had also its effect. We find the great comic poet alluding to this custom in more than one of his plays. t The lunuilt of an Athenian audience at the theatres is described with great spirit in the French Anacharsis. The facts are collected from various ancient authors; and thej'- form the best comment on what Plato somewhere calls the Theatrocracy of Athens. " On le voit par degres murmurer sourdement, rire avec eclat, pousser des cris tumultueux contra I'acteur, I'accabler de sifflets, frapper des pieds pour I'obliger de quitter la seine, lui f aire oter son masque pour jnuir de sa fionte, ordonner au heraut d'appeler un autre acteur qui est mis a I'amende s'il n'est pas present, quelquefois me me demander qu'on inflige au premier des peines dcshonorantes. Ni I'age, la celebrite, ni de longs services ne sauraient le garantir de ces rigoureux traitemens. De nouvoaux succes peu- vent seuls Pen dcdommager ; car dans I'occasion on bat des mains, et I'on ap- plaudit avec le meme plaisir et la meme fureur. Le Jeuna Anach. t. vi. p. 92. X Barthelemy, speaking on this subject, (and he cannot be accused of want- ing diligence in his researches,) says, " II ne m'a pas etc possible de fixer le 56 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. appointed, ancient authors have not left us any very satisfactory intel- ligence ; but that they were not always correct in their critical opinions, ihe wellknown anecdotes of Philemon and Menander, among many others, sufficiently testify; and that this incorrectness did not always proceed from mere errour in judgment, we find Aristophanes pretty clearly hinting,* and Xenophon, in his Symposium, very plainly de- claring. Now if the judge in the theatre was, like the dicast in the courts of law, not inaccessible to a bribe, we may easily believe, that the sophists and their friends, among whom must be classed the sons and relatives of all the richest men in Athens, and who had possessed interest enough but three or four years before to shut up the comic theatre altogether, would not be idle in taking every means to quash an opponent, who had already given proofs that he could deal blows, if Hot harder, at least more effective, than even those which the strong- handed Cratinus had administered. If that intimacy too subsisted be- tween Socrates and Alcibiades, which Plato would make us believe, but which XenOphon, so often at variance with liis great fellow pupil of the Socratic school, almost denies, we may believe that this young person, the most intemperate, insolent, and violent, according to the latter, of all the young men of rank in Athens, would bestir himself in favour of a preceptor, who, if he could not gain his affections by his lessons of virtue and wisdom, had at least a claim upon his gratitude for having the preceding year saved his life in battle. But there are reasons to make us disagree with ^lian, and oblige us to think that it was the audience, and not the judges, to whom must be ascribed the ill success of the piece. There can be no doubt that the Clouds failed, and there is as little doubt that the author recast his piece with the in- tention of bringing it before the audience a second time ; — that it was so brought, the acutest modern critics seem to doubt. By some curious accident, it so happens that the play originally condemned has come down to us Avith fpart of a parabasis (or address to the audience) evi- nombre des juges ; j'en ai compte quelquefois cinq, quelquefois sept, et d'autres fois davantage," t. vi. p. 75. De Paiiw speaks with the same uncertainty as to the number of judges appointed for these solemn decisions. Recherches Philo- sopliiqucs, t. i. p. 184. * In Avibus, 1102. "Jamais on nevit," says the author last quoted, " des decisions comparables aux decisions de ce tribunal-la : souvent il rejetoit avec mepris les plus grands chef-d'ceuvres d'Euripide en de Menandre, et couronnoit les pieces les plus absurdes et les plus ridicules. II faut, dit Elien, que de deux choses il en soit necessairement arrive une : ou les juges du theatre d'Athenes se laissoient aveugler par une grand partialite, ou ils se laissoient corrompre par une grande somme de drachmes antiques. Mais il me paroit, qu'ils n'etoient pas aussi souvent frappes de vertigo qu'eblouis par I'eclat de I'argent, malgre le vain appareil de leur serment." f Mr Cumberland, who was not aware of this circumstance, has been led into some errours by it in his translation of the Clouds. The learned Madame PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 57 dently intended for the second. The author here complains pretty- bitterly (for Aristophanes was clearly a man of warm feelings) of the injustice which had been done to this most elaborate of all his perform- ances ; but he no where hints at the judicial overseers as the occasion of its failure ; on the contrary, the reproach is directed against the spectators, and from the epithet he attaches to them, we may see that it was a class of spectators not usually found in the comic theatre. Tlie nature of the poet's subject, and the unusual labour, which, as he inti- mates more than once, he had bestowed upon the composition of it, had evidently led him to reckon upon an audience of a somewhat higher description than usual ; and as the keenest amateur of the Theatre Francois sometimes deserts the sublime acting of Talma for the inimi- table buffooneries of Totier and Brunet, so Aristophanes seems to have thought that he might reasonably calculate upon having, for once at least, the gentlemen of Athens (tlie x.aKoiKa.ya^oi'^ among his hearers. That they did attend, and that they assisted in the demolition of the piece with the less enlightened of the audience, is pretty clearly inti- mated in the poet's own words. tolvt' hv Vfxn fxtjupo/umt ton s^opo/f, eel hhk* iyce tclvt' iTr^ay/ua.TtuofjLHV In his play of the succeeding year, the Wasps, Aristophanes again complains of the failure of his Clouds, and mentions the direct reason of its failure, viz. a novelty of invention, which the audience had not the merit to appreciate. Had we not this direct testimony of the author, our researches would have led us to this very conclusion. The subject of the Clouds turned upon one of the most serious and important con- siderations in human affairs, the science of education : and what con- nection was there between this and the Dionysian Festival, where every one came to be amused ; where he who laughed loudest was the mer- riest, and he that laughed longest was the wisest ? Why were the Athenian rabble to be cheated of their Bacchanalian festivity, and to be passed off with a lecture, which, though conveyed through the medium of two fighting cocks, had yet something too serious in it, to be suffi- ciently piquant for an Athenian audience just ripe for all the nonsense of holiday revelry ? What was it to them how the education of the higher classes was conducted ; or what did they care for the opinions of Protagoras or Polus, of Prodicus or Gorgias ? The persons and the sentiments of these fashionable sophists would be equally unknown, it is most probable, to the greater part of such an audience as generally Dacier, whose enthusiastic admiration of Aristophanes led her, if I remember right, to peruse his " Clouds" no less than two hundred times, (being precisely the same number of lections as Al-farabi is said to have given to the rhetoric of Aristotle,) has fallen into the same mistake. 8 58 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. filled the comic theatres at Athens. To add to this unfortunate choice of subject, Aristophanes added another errour, viz. an unfortunate choice of time ; for he selected for his representation of the Clouds that parti- cular festival, when strangers as well as natives were admitted to the theatrical entertainments, and when of the thirty thousand spectators who were present, half, at least, were probably strangers. And what was Socrates, the son of Sophroniscus, the statuary,* and Phaenaret, the midwife, to them ? Pericles and Cleon were names familiar to their ears, and any hint upon the subject of politics, obtained through the introduction of them upon the stage, was abundantly grateful ; but what had they to do with an obscure philosopher, whose name was hardly known in his own native town, and the introduction of whom upon the stage, as the hero of a piece, was an honour which had perhaps never before been conferred upon a person of his rank in life, and which his envious and jealous peers were not likely to see bestowed without ex- treme jealousy and ill will? Strangers would naturally ask, as we learn from iElian they actually did — Who is this Socrates t and if, as that same author relates, Socrates stood up in the theatre to gratify the curiosity thus excited, it will be no uncharitable remark to impute it, partly, to his sense of the opportunity thus offered for gaining a name in society, an advantage which, to a person of his pursuits in life, was of incalculable importance. This is, perhaps, sufficient to show upon what general grounds the Clouds fell ; but there are also some particular ones, which might not be without a share in its rejection. In his play of the preceding year, (the Demagogues,) Aristophanes had passed some severe sarcasms upon his countrymen for their general ingratitude to their comic poets ; and though the extraordinary merit of the perform- ance had carried the poet successfully through at the time, the Athenians, when their enthusiasm was over, were not a people likely to forget the affront, nor to let it pass with impunity. A rival bard, whose name had been introduced into that performance, furnished them, on the fol- lowing year, with the triple means of indemnifying themselves, of re- warding an old favourite, and reducing the pride of a young competitor. Cratinus, in short, whom Aristophanes had considered as a man past his labours, resented the affronts put upon him ; and in return for a train of somewhat suspicious compliment, not without a hint or two at infirmities which intemperance had created, he brought forward a co- medy called the Wine Flask, the subject of which was founded on his young rival's allusions ; and to this piece, more suited in its nature and * Sophroniscus is somewhere mentioned by Lucian as an hermoglyphist ; a person whose business it was to engrave inscriptions on marble, or rather on the Hermaic statues. The profession of the father of Socrates would, according to this, rank between the sculptor and the common stonemason. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 59 its allusions to a Bacchanalian festival than discussions upon education, the prize of victory, as we learn by the Didascaliae, was adjudged. With candid and discerning readers, the present writer feels no doubt that the way has already been paved for the justification of Aristophanes by the preceding remarks, and that many errours, which might have arisen in their minds from confounding the ancient drama witli the modern, (than which no two things can be more dissimilar,) have been altogether removed. It is not for him to tell them what inferences are to be drawn from the circumstances which have been incidentally men- tioned — that Aristophanes did not invent the Old Comedy, but found it ready made to his hands — that in his satirical* and even his indecentf vein he acted upon established principles ; principles which, however inconsistent with our notions upon such subjects, found sanction in tlie very religion of the times. The information given respecting the masks has apprised them, that the audience came to the exhibition with a previous knowledge that they were to consider what they saw merely as a harmless! caricature ; the comic poet being to them, something like * The Athenians were, in fact, at all times, (independently of their Baccha- nalian festivals,) a race of scoffers. Their comic poets exceed their tragic in a very large ratio; and a nation must have been far gone in mirth, which thought it necessary to exact an oath of the grave Archon, that he had not written a comedy. They, who trace the wars of Louis XIV. to an illconstructed window, and the politics of Queen Anne's court to a cup of tea thrown over Mrs Masham's gown, will not fail to see the Greek propensity to slander rather than panegyric, even in the metrical canons of their dramas. It was sufficient for the most ele- vated person to have an unfortunate combination of syllables in his name, to prevent him from furnishing matter for the delicate mouth of the Tragic Muse; but comedy boulted him, under every species of refractory appellation. In the trochaic tetrameter, he could be introduced as a dactyl, and even in the place of the regular dipodia, he was served up as a choriambns, or an Ionic ^ minore. The persecuted anapest, which was so cautiously admitted into the iambic sena- rius, found a city of refuge with the comic poets ; ;md when vituperation was to be dealt, it did not of necessity follow witii ihcm, that the catalectic dipodia or K*Ttui\u( of the iambic tetrameter, should be a bacchius. f In addition to the works referred to on a former occasion, may be added the treatises of Joannes Nicolaus and Petrus Castellanus in the valuable Thesaurus of Gronovius, tom. vii. It was not supposed that the chastest mind was injured by Joining in these Bacchanalian revels. Diog. Laert. lib. ii. § 78. See also Lucian in Amor. v. 5. p. 317. Plato, in one of the gravest of his works, consi- ders drunkenness as not only allowable, but even as a sort of duty on the Dionysian Festivals. De Leg. lib. vi. p. 623. B. ^ Wieland has written an essay of considerable length on the subject of the differences between Socrates and Aristophanes. As his view of the subject is entirely different from the one here taken up, his line of argument is, of course, as different; he fully agrees with the present writer, hovveve'r, in thinking that no consequences ever resulted from the exhibitions of the comic theatre, and that 60 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. what a Gilray was to us ; with this difference, that the former drew entirely from his own resources, while that ingenious caricaturist often acted upon the suggestions of wiser heads than his own. As these plays were acted only once, the reader will tell himself, that it became a ne- cessity that the impression made should be a strong one ; and this necessity will be further enforced to his mind by the reflection, that the audience could only carry away, what they retained in their me- mories ; — what they lost in the recitation was not likely to be recalled by books ; for these were few and scarce, and the Athenians were, as we have already observed, a seeing and hearing, but not a reading pub- lic. For these and a few other remarks the penetration of the reader may be trusted. In this place also, were it necessary, we might enter at some length into the state of parties, which in some shape or other always divided Athens. A war party and a peace party — a party which favoured aristocratical, and a party which in like manner leaned to de- mocratical principles, are terms which we easily understand ; and we can guess, by the influence they have upon ourselves, what would be their effects upon the fiery, disputatious, and idle citizens of Athens. To their literary* parties, however, and more particularly to that war of opinion, Avhich existed between the philosophers and the writers for the comic stage, we have nothing analogous ; but it was as keen, as bitter, and as unremitting as any opposition of politics between the Whig and Tory of this country : even the subordinate animosities be- tween the comedian and the fluteplayer, who was employed to regulate the steps of the choral movements, give occasion to remarks in the plays of Aristophanes, (who certainly did not want for the esprit de corps) which to this day are highly amusing. Now though nobody questions the general sincerity of those who advocate Whig and Tory principles among ourselves, yet we believe the warmest arguers on either side would not always like to be taken to the letter in the opinions of each other, which the heat of argument sometimes elicits : strong expressions on one side are and must be met by strong expressions on the other ; opinion must be combated by opinion, and the public are the real gainers by the warmth of the controversy — they form silently their judgment from the conflicting parties, and often set right those who are ostensibly their preceptors. And in free states it is right that therefore every reader may, with a safe conscience, relish the wit and farcical humour of the " Clouds," without making himself uneasy in ascribing malevo- lent motives to the author of the piece. See his Versuch iiber die Frage : ob und wie fern Aristofanes, etc. * Their extreme violence may be best judged of, by referring to some of the literary contests of Italy. The separate pretensions of Tassoni and Biacciolini to the invention of the comic Epopeia, were almost contested at the sword's point. The Ariostisti and Tassisti form two warm factions even at this day. — LUterature du Midi, t. ii. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. . 61 all this should be so. The atmosphere which we breathe is purged and cleansed in the same manner : the explosion takes place above, and the quiet fields below are only made sensible of the storm by the show- ers which are elicited from the concussion, and which fall to gladden, to fatten, and to fertilize. In this sense, Socrates, as a philosopher, was fair game for Aristophanes, as a comedian ; and the good sense of the former (perhaps the most predominant feature in his wonderful mind) would lead him to be the first to laugh at the absurdity, and would teach him that in a free slate it was better that many things should evaporate in a laugh than in a more serious way. Many other points might here be insisted upon, and particularly such as would tend to remove those prejudices, which lead readers to suppose, that Socrates was, at the time of the exhibition of the Clouds, the same important personage to his contemporaries, which his doctrines and his death have since made him to posterity ; and that therefore any attack upon him must have been the efiect of envy and malevolence. Independently of the privileged license of a poet, whose opinions are always considered with a certain degree of indulgence, it would be easy to prove, from the long note attached to the translated parabasis in the Knights, that Socrates, an obscure philosopher just commencing his career, could be no great object of envy to Aristophanes, already high in fame, and shining in a branch of that particular profession* where it was so pecu- liarly the object of ambition in Athens to excel. The relationships of rank — those relations which all are so ready to deny as influencing their conduct, but which, in fact, operate so strongly (and with good reason) upon all — might here also be mentioned with effect ; and it would be no difficult matter to show, that though a mistaken contempt might thus be generated, there would be small grounds for supposing a decided malevolence, in a man of rank and property, to the son of Phae- naret the midwife, who valued his house with all its contents at five minae. Even the opposition of personal character, as well as of pro- fession, between the philosopher and the poet; — the one gay, jovial, lighthearted, and a man of the world ; the other serious, thoughtful, and contemplative ; witty perhaps, but from the vivacity which lies in the intellect, and not that more sociable one which lies in the tempera- ment, might not have been undeserving of remark, and still more might we insist upon the circumstance, that the personal! appearance of So- * The possession of talents for the drama were, according to Plato, the surest road to honour and promotion in Athens, as military endowments were in Sparta. \ The enthusiastic admiration, which the character of Socrates has justly excited, has led some men to question the fact of his deformity, and even to assert the very contrary. Epictetus, among the ancients, originated, I beheve, this opinion ; and it appears from Brucker, that there have been some modern writers, hardy enough to follow his steps, in spite of the express testimonies of 62 PRELIMINARV DISCOURSE. crates (which was described more at length than persons of good taste might think warrantable, on purpose to give effect to this remark) was a consideraiion to a poet, part of whose entertainment consisted in the ridiculousness* of his masks, and who in giving the masks of Prodicus or Hippias, would have given what tbe greater part of the spectators would neither have knowledge of, nor relish for: — but it is time to hasten to remarks of a more important tendency, and these will be dis- cussed as freely, but as candidly as every other part of the subject. The name of Socrates is known to most readers only, by the page of history, where nothing appears in its undress ; and even in persons tolerably conversant with the learned languages, the knowledge of this singular man is often confined to that beautiful little work of Xenophon, which indeed deserves the classical appellation of " golden," and to that immortal Trilogyt of Plato, which has been embalmed by the tearsf of all ages. When we read the admirable system of ethics (some few blots excepted) which is laid open in the former, and the simple nar- rations which conduct the author of them to the close of his mortal career in the latter, it is not simply a burst of admiration, or grief, or horrour, which breaks from us, but a union of all three, so profound, and so involved, that the mind must be strong indeed, which can prevent the feelings, for a time, from mastering the judgment. Few readers, it is believed, even make the attempt : the prison scene is an agony of suffering, to which the mind gives way that it may not be torn by op- posing it; Socrates drinking the poison shocks the imagination — we feel, such is the merit of the sufferer, or such the consummate§ skill of Plato and Xenophon to the contrary. Epicteti vestigiis insistunt celeberrimi viri I. A. Fabricius et C. H. Heumannus, qui de forma Socratis non deformi et fceda quemadmodum vulgo traditur, docte commentatus est, putatque ex male intellecto Zopyri, insulsi hotninls et ab Alcibiade derisi, judlcio, et ex confuse Cratete, deformi specie noto, cum Socrate, fabulam fuisse natam. De Schola Socratica. Brucker, v. i. p. 542. * A ridiculous face was, according to Aristotle, a legitimate point of attack in comedy, and fell precisely under the Greek definition of the yiKom. f The works of Plato are usually divided into tetralogues ; and considering their dramatic nature, the idea of thus dividing them is not an unhappy one. In this manner the Euthypron is generally coupled with the apologia, the Criton, and the Phaedon, but I think, not very fortunately. The Euthypron has in it the fault, which may be ascribed to so many of the dialogues of Plato ; it refutes and removes opinions quite sufficient for the good conduct of ordinary life, and substitutes nothing better in their place. X One of the greatest, wisest, and best men of antiquity, and whose little infir- mities only made him the more amiable, confesses that he never read the Phaedon without an agony of tears. Quid dicam de Socrate ? cujus morti tVlachrymare soleo Platonem legens. — Clc. de Nat. Deor. lib. viii. § The following remark, by a most discerning judge of conduct, deserves in- sertion here. , "The magnanimity of Socrates surely deserves admiration ; yet PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 63 ' his biographer, as if a sin had been committed against human nature — we think for a moment that a chasm has been left in society which can never again be filled up, and we feel as if we could stop nature herself in her course, to protest against a transaction, the guilt of which seems to belong to all ages. It is an invidious task to interrupt the current of such feelings, even if there be any thing illegitimate in their source : fortunately for the honour of our species these feelings are mostly right in their application, and what deductions are made can be supplied from higher sources ; we should spurn ourselves if we otherwise attempted to do them away. What these deductions are must now be explained, and the writer of this discourse feels assured, that the minds and the authorities of persons infinitely more learned than himself, will go with him in the explanation. Two books have been referred to, (forming but a small portion of the Chartae Socraticx, or those writings by which the manners, life and doctrines of Socrates may be made familiar to us) as including almost all that is known of this extraordinary man by the generality of readers. These books form part of the system of education in most of our great schools : they are read at an age, when the feelings are warm, the impressions vivid and lively, and when the pride of learning is beginning to operate very strongly. This course of study necessarily brings two names into contact, which are often afterwards connected merely for the purpose of making dangerous and unworthy comparisons. Youthful and inquisitive minds see that system of ethics, which they are told, more particularly, forms the internal evidence for the divine authority of the Scriptures, in some measure laid open by the hand of Xenophon ; they see the immortality of the soul intimated in the dia- logues of Plato, and did their researches extend farther into the Socratic philosophy, they might see dark suggestions of many of the other great Scriptural doctrines — the nature of moral evil, the originally happy state of man, the deluge, the doctrine of free will, and a future state of re- wards and punishments. The much greater doctrines of Repentance and the Atonement they do not see displayed ; but neither the voices of their own conscience nor a commerce with the world, have taught them the truly divine hand manifested in the former, and the incomplete development of their faculties renders them utterly incapable of duly estimating the latter. We know that we speak from higher authority than our own, when we say that the consequences of these early im- pressions are often fatal ; that men are thus made half-wise in human it is not that in which he most outshone other men. The circumstances of Lord Russell's fate were far more trying. Socrates, we may easily suppose, would have borne Lord Russell's trial ; but with Bishop Burnet for his eulogist, instead of Plato and Xenophon, he would not have had his present splendid fame." Mit. Hist, of Greece, y. p. 155. 64 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. learning and utterly ignorant in that better wisdom, which makes wise unto salvation. A deeper research into the writings of the Socratic school might lead them to appreciate somewhat better that profound maxim, which does so much honour to the most thoughtful and philo- sophic people in Europe, that there is no philosophy so deep as the philosophy of Christianity: but time, opportunity, and it may be added, a more competent share of scholarship than sometimes falls to the lot of such persons, are necessary to the task ; and the consequence is, that they are left a prey to doubts and disquietudes, from which even the consciousness of an upright and unblemished life does not at all times remove the sting. We have for this reason felt less compunction than we should other- wise have done in removing any prop to virtue, however misplaced, by displaying some proofs in the preceding part of these remarks, that the character of Socrates was a little more open to remark, than some ad- mirers in their ignorance are aware of, and more than some in their knowledge, are willing to bring into notice. Learned and ijnpartial men, well acquainted with the subject, will do the present writer the justice to say, that some points are not pressed so closely as they might have been, and that had he not confined himself to the two authors, from whom he has very rarely deviated, his remarks might have been conveyed in a higher tone of censure. His object, however, has been, not to depreciate Socrates, but to do justice to a man, whose motives have been much mistaken, and whose character, in consequence, has been unduly depreciated. In pursuing our remarks upon Xenophon and Plato, the two highest and most genuine authorities to which we can apply for the character of Socrates, a little more may turn up for the justification of Aristophanes. Dates and periods make no great figure in literary discussions ; but they are often of the utmost importance in settling the real truth of things. Our opinions of Socrates are derived entirely from the writings of Xenophon, Plato and Aristophanes ; and we believe many readers class all these persons in their minds as immediate contemporaries, and perhaps, from a passage in Plato's Banquet, as living in habits of society together. This was so far from being the case, that the two great biographers of Socrates were actually children in the nursery, at the time the Clouds were brought upon the stage ; the future master of the Academy being then but six years old, and Xenophon within a year of the same age. Had these difficulties rested only on the testimony of such a man as Diogenes Laertius, whose sins of forgetfulness are almost proverbial, they need not have demanded much investigation ; but when we find the mistake originating with a writer in general so accurateas Strabo, it becomes us to state the grounds of our dissent from them. In the battle of Delium, which took place one year before the representation of the Clouds, Socrates is represented by both these PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 66 Writers as saving the life of Xenophon, during the retreat which follow- ed that celebrated engagement. No one acquainted with chronology will hesitate to say, that this is a ridiculous fiction. The first important event in the very eventful life of Xenophon was his joining the expe- dition of Cyrus, a prince certainly not without errours, but whose cha- racter, like that of many of the other Persian princes and nobles, con- trasts very favourably with the rude republicans, with whom they were brought so much into contact. This expedition is settled by chronolo- gists as taking place just twentyone years after the battle of Delium ; and Xenophon, who has left us so matchless an account of that inte- resting expedition, calls himself at the time a young man, and gives us to understand that his close pursuit of philosophy, coupled with his early years, excited the mirth of his fellow soldiers, till circumstances taught them to appreciate the practical effects which often result from such theoretical pursuits. The English historian of Greece, who to the utmost boldness and originality of opinion, unites the greatest patience and minuteness of research, settles the age of Xenophon at the time of his first connection with Cyrus at six or seven and twenty. What Socrates, therefore, really was at the time of the representation of the Clouds, and how far the poet was justified in his attack, neither of the two persons, from whom alone any autlientic accounts respecting him have come down to us, could possibly tell : their intercourse with their great master must have commenced long after the period in question, and apparently the whole of Xenophon's work, and, no doubt, many of the dialogues of Plato were written at a time,* when for their own personal safety it became them to communicate rather what they wished to be made known respecting their great leader, than what they could make known. These writers, besides, difier considerably in their ac- counts of their master: in some points they are almost diametrically opposite to each other, in others they evidently write at each other ; and perhaps the same remark may have struck the reader, which has often occurred to the present writer, that as the most excellent of Xeno- phon's compositions is that which he derives entirel} from Socrates, so the most noble and the most perfect workf of Plato is that into * The death of Socrates was a signal for Plato and other philosophers to leave Athens. They retired, says Herinodorus, to Eucleid at Megara, " fearing the cruelty of the tyrants," i. e. the mob of Athens. The accounts of the speedy remorse of the Athenians for the atrocity they had committed seem to deserve very little credit. Vid. Le Jeune Anach. l. v. 558. Mitford Hist, of Greece, vi. p. 407. j- His work on Legislation. As exclusive praise is worth but little, it will be proper to except the encomiums on drunkenness, contained in the first book, the community of goods enforced in the fifth book, the subjection of women to public meals and gymnastic exercises, and some absurdities on the subject of marriage, and the evident tendency to Manicheean principles in the tenth. With 9 66 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. which even the name of Socrates does not enter. Now when an enemy and a friend give something like the same account of a person ; and especially when the favouring parly has had previously a warning voice to caution him as to the line he might take in his delineation, a strong presumption arises, that the joint opinion of two such persons comes nearer the truth, than that of a single individual, however respectable in character, or gifted with talent. Now it may confidently be affirmed that the single fact of Socrates receiving pay for his instructions ex- cepted, (the great charge of making the worse appear the better cause, has been already disposed of,) the mysticism, the garrulity, the hair- splitting* niceties of language, the contempt for exteriour appearance, these exceptions, this work may perhaps be termed the most noble of all that antiquity has left us. If the irnKatot Aoyot to which Plato so continually refers in it were nothing more nor less than accounts received, in his travels, from the Egyptian priests, and derived by them, through the two Hermae, from the Old Testament, the wonder excited by its excellence will soon cease. There is something so sublime in the language, and so nearly prophetic in the application of the following passage, that though not immediately to the present subject, the reader, I think, will not object to its insertion. It is an address to the ima- ginary persons, for whom the writer is legislating — " Citizens, we will say to them, God, according to an old tradition, (that God, in whose hands are the beginning, the end and the middle of all things,) finishes in a right line, con- formably to his nature, even when his motions appear to be circuitous. Behind him follows Justice, the punisher of all aberrations from the divine law. He that would be happy, lays hold upon her, and follows, clothed in the garment of humility; but he that is elated by pride, or finds cause of exaltation in his riches, his honours or his personal beauty; he that in the union of youth and madness, has his soul fired by insolence, as if he required neither ruler, nor guide, but was himself competent to guide others ; that person is abandoned by God and left to himself. Thus abandoned, this person joins to him others as wicked as himself, and in the wantonness of his exultation, he overturns and confounds everything. And to the many and the vulgar for a time he appears to be somebody : but vengeance after a time comes upon him : and subjected to a punishment, which none can blame, the end of that man is, that he consigns to utter destruction, himself, his family and his country." De Leg. 1. iv. p. 600 G. * An example taken almost at hazard from a dialogue, where perhaps Kant, and certainly Locke, might have found a great part of their theories ready traced for them, will fully justify this expression. The philosopher is explaining various cases, where a false opinion is impossible ; and if Aristophanes had been one of the auditors, it is conceived, that he would have found more than one passage in the dialogue, where it would have puzzled him to draw the line between the philosopher and the sophist. Socrates leaving just supposed a large sensorium of wax to be in everybody's brain, produces a variety of cases of impossible false opinion, by reasoning as follows. "That which any one knows, and has a remembrance of in the soul, but whi^h he does not feel; it is impossible that he should mistake this for some- thing else which he knows, and of which he has also the impress, but not the PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 67 the *melancholy temperament, the strong addiction to tphysical pursuits, the belief in a supernatural agency, to an extent not precisely recognized by the religion of his country, every single trait of the Aristophanic sensation. Again, that what he knows, is another thing which he does not know, nor has the impress of: or, that what he does not know, is another thing which he also does not know; or that what he does not know, is another thing which he does know, as also that what he feels, is another thing which he also feels ; or that what he feels, is some other thing which he does not feel ; or that what he does not feel, is some other thing, which he does not feel, or what he does not feel is some other of the things which he does feel, on all these it is impossible to entertain a false opinion. Again, of the things, which a man both knows and A^els, having the impress of sensation, that a man should think any one of these some other ihing which he feels and knows, having the signof tliat also by sensation, is, if possible, still more impossible than those former things. It is equally impossible that what a person knows and feels, and keeps a type of in the niemory, should be imagined by him to be some other thing which he knows; or again that what he knows and feels, and preserves a remembrance of, is another thing which he feels; or that what he neither knows nor feels, is another thing which he does not know ; or that what he does not know nor feel is another thing which he does not feel." — In all these and many more such cases, the philosopher pronounces it to be utterly impossible that a man should think wrong. If the reader have patience to read this passage through, or to cast his eyes over the Lysis, the Cratylus, the Philebus, or the Parmenides of Plato, (dialogues in which it is sometimes difficult to separate the burlesque from the serious.) he will, I think, come to the conclusion, that the scenes in the Clouds, representing the boltingtub and the cock and hen pullet, etc., absurd as they may appear to us, were derived from actual conversations of Socrates, twisted perhaps a little from their original purport, and reported by some friend, who in such a gossipping town as Athens, might know what Aristophanes wanted in his hero for the Clouds. * The melancholy temperament of Socrates has been noticed by Aristotle ; that Aristophanes considered him as a man eaten up, with what Goethe some- where calls the " kribscrabs von imagination," may be seen from the nickname the poet applies to his house. An explanation of the Socratic fhiiontistehium is given in a note attached to the translation of the Clouds. t Had there been no other confirmation of this trait in the Aristophanic Socrates, than the little parenthetical concessions, so cautiously admitted by Xenophon in his Memorabilia, (p. 3G1, 3. 3G'3, 5.) and the remarks on natural causes made by Socrates in his Banquet (p. 8G.) I should feel that this was quite sufficient for establishing the fact. In Plato's Phaedon, however, (p. 392, G. H. etc.) the fact is admitted at great length, that Socrates in his younger days had been vehemently addicted to physical inquiries; and indeed on com- paring the whole of the admissions by his two bioorraphers, it seems no unfair inference to assert, that the intellect of Socrates, like that of An;ixagoras, had, at one time, very nearly sunk under the intensity of his researciies into these dangerous speculations. It is singular, and shows how cautious we ought to be in our judgments formed from the writings of antiquity, that what Socrates in the Phaedon so unreservedly admits, in the Apologia he, with as little reser" ration, denies. 68 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. Socrates may be traced in the Platonic, and in some cases with aggra- vating circumstances, which, if the poet had been ill disposed towards the piiilosopher, or had even had any more personal knowledge of him, than what necessarily happened in a town, not of very considerable population, and whose customs and manners brought all persons more into contact than the habits of modern society do, would certainly not have been suppressed in a picture, supposed to be drawn from wilful perversion and malevolent misrepresentation. What are we to conclude from all this ? The fair inference seems to be, that the Clouds was not written for the purpose of exposing Socrates, but that Socrates was selected (and for reasons previously mentioned) for the purpose of giving more effect to the Clouds, as an ingenious satire directed against the sophists and the pernicious system of public education at Athens : so far from its being a wilful misrepresentation, dictated by envy or jea- lousy, it seems very probable, that the parties were very little known to each other ; that the character of Socrates made much that sort of impression on the poet, which it was designed the preceding portrait of him should make upon the reader; and finally it is affirmed, that it is a much more difficult problem to solve, why Aristophanes should be sin- gularly right in his representation of others, and singularly wrong in his representation of Socrates ; than it is to take the plain case, that the poet drew the philosopher, such as he knew him at the time to be, (which is not improbable,) or such, as he judged him, from a very im- perfect knowledge, to be, which appears to be more than probable. If the reader concur with the present writer, he will go one step farther ; so far from blaming the poet for the course he pursued in consequence of his real or mistaken knowledge, he will think him entitled to the gratitude of posterity for the assumption and the execution of the task. We are all fond of the expression that Socrates brought down philoso- phy from the clouds (and certainly till his time the clouds had been her principal residence) to live among men. If the poet found him on his journey for that purpose, he was not to know the nature of the philoso- pher's errand, and the wholesome reproof, that was dealt him on the oc- casion, (for our virtues and our vices, our merits and our demerits are often the children of circumstances,) had perhaps the power of direct- ing his mind to better pursuits. We conclude therefore, with saying, that as we possibly owe to the severity of a Review the poet of our own days, who has left all his contemporaries behind him, and made the proudest of his predecessors, in all ages and countries, tremble for their supremacy; so we owe to the ridicule of the Old Comedy the philosopher, whose name (with certain deductions) no man mentions without feeling himself exalted for a time in the scale of creation. The idle story of iElian, that Socrates was put to death in conse- quence of the representation of the Clouds, (two events between which, it is almost needless to observe, an interval of more than twenty years PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. -- tJ? occurred,) has been refuted with too much spirit by Mr Cumberland, in the Observer, to require any further notice ; the apparent support* given to such an opinion by Plato, being easily accounted for. But if this idle notion about the immediate cause of the death of Socrates orig- inated with iElian, it must also be remembered, that thisf amusing but credulous writer, has, in the exercise of his vocation, "Compiler, compiler, compiler," — evidently struck upon the true cause of Socrates' death ; namely, his politi- cal opinions. "Socrates," says iElian, "disliked the Athenian consti- tution, as he saw that democracy has in it all the evils of tyranny and absolute monarchy." With that natural good sense, which lay at the bottom of all the real or pretended inequalities of Socrates, this extraor- dinary man seems to have determined within himself, that the vocation to which he had devoted himself, (and a more high and lofty one has seldom been conceived,) should not be disturbed by tlie officious inter- position and misguided zeal of such an imperious and ignorant rabble as the mass of the Athenian people were. In his religious practices, therefore, he at least made every decent sacrifice to the opinions of his country; and his political opinions, a still more delicate point in the sus- picious and irritable town of Athens, he seems to have kept as closely as possible to himself. It was with a view to the latter object, as he him- self plainly intimates in his defence, that he had abstained from the Gen- eral Assemblies ; wishing neither to give offence by declaring his senti- ments, nor to compromise his character (a character not less marked by inflexible integrity, than the most determined courage) by withholding them. The same good sense appears to have determined him in re- fraining from being initiated in the Mysteries, the only part of the *In Apologia, 359. Plato, of course, is not guilty of the same chronological errour as j^-^lian. He merely makes his Socrates observe to the dicasts, that the accusations then advanced against him by Melitus were the same as those which in their younger days, they had seen brought forward against him by Aristo- phanes on the stage. Vexation, at the inconvenience occasioned to the Socratic school by the death of their master, — literary jealousy, proverbially inherent in Plato, and evidently not least directed against Aristophanes, — and perhaps re- venge for an attack, much more light and goodhumoured than the offence war- ranted, (see Ecclesiazusae of Aristophanes, and the note on the fifth book of his Republic,) assisted, no doubt, in provoking this attack upon the comic poet. f Rabelais, a man of too much imagination not to be delighted with a gossip- ing book of legends and prodigies, like iKlian's Varia Historia; and a man of too much sense not to despise the narrator of them, among other rubs gives him the following in his description of the land of Satin : Si croyez ceux qui disent le oontraire, vous en trouverez mal, voire fust ce Elian fiercekt de menitrie ,■ — *'j1<]lian, that long-bow man," as the English translator renders it, "who lies as fast as a dogr can trot." 70 FRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. Greek worship, as a writer observes, who brings the most profound erudition to whatever opinion he chooses to advocate, which seems to have possessed any energy, and the ricHcule or violation of which alone seems to have been visited with any severe vengeance. But however cautious Socrates might be of touching upon these points in public, the same caution was ill observed perhaps in private ; and the writings of Xenophon and Plato (for in this point there is no discrepancy between them) prove that the ridicule of Socrates against the constitution of his country was not pointed merely at its mode of choosing its magistrates by the fortuitous direction of pebbles or beans. This discourse would exceed all bounds, if it detailed one half of the bitter invectives against democracy, with which the writings of these two most distinguished scholars of Socrates are filled. Besides more direct attacks, Plato evin- ces his contempt at all times for the constitutions of his own country, by deriving almost all the regulations of his Utopian states from the maxims of her bitter enemy, the Lacedaemonians. Even that regard, which a painter and an author, like Plato, might be expected to enter- tain for a mode of government, proverbially affording the greatest varie- ty of characters, and consequently multiplying his materials of occupa- tion, even this has little influence in mitigating that contempt for demo- cracy, which the master of the Academy everywhere expresses ; — he adverts indeed to the advantage, (in Rep. lib. viii.) but it is to treat it with derision, and to compare it with that predilection, which leads wo- men and children to select the robes that have most variety of colours in them. Xenophon, living more out of the reach of the tyranny of the Athenian mob, observes still less limits in his expressions of indig- nation : and whatever of the clearsightedness and personal virtue can give effect to the expression of opinions, both will be found contributing to give influence to the declarations of this excellent man ; the soldier- philosopher-author, as the English historian of Greece, by a bold com- bination, enthusiastically calls him. He talks bitterly of the numbers of his fellow countrymen, who, " not worth a drachma, were ready to sell their country, with all in it, that they might have a drachma :" he inveighs with the most emphatic indignation against that imperious " crowd of fullers, shoemakers, carpenters, braziers, husbandmen, and dealers," who composed the general assemblies in Athens, and " whose great object in life," he says, " was to buy cheap, and to sell dear:" he intimates that all the world through, democracy and virtue are ever at variance ; and he concludes one of those bitterly contemptuous chap- ters against the Athenian constitution, which, by their decided variation with the general equability of his style, show how warmly he felt on the subject, with words, which have been quoted in another part of this volume, and which would not have been uttered with impunity within the walls of Athens : — " That the populace should be partial to a demo- cracy, I can easily excuse ; for it is pardonable that every person should PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 71 try to benefit himself; but if any one, not immediately in the rank of the people, prefer living in a democratical rather than in an *oligarchi- cal government, that man is a villain by anticipation, and acts upon the consciousness, that it is easier for a scoundrel to escape detection in a state where the government is in the hands of many, than it is in a state where the government is in the hands of a few." What Plato and Xenophon expressed in their writings, Alcibiades and Critias, the two most conspicuous disciples of Socrates, evinced still more decidedly by their actions. Never had democracy two such clever, active, and insatiable foes ; and when we read in the articles of accusation against the son of Sophroniscus, that he corrupted the young men of Athens, we have only to open the writings of Xenophon, and to reflect upon the conduct of Crilias and Alcibiades, to know what that charge was meant to convey. So mighty, however, is truth, that even with the awkward fact of great disasters brouglit upon the common- wealth by two men, the formation of whose characters, or of one at least, was ascribed wholly to Socrates, all the charges against him were easily refuted: a strong murmur, indeed, of disapprobation attended the annunciation, that this object of popular resentment acted under the im- mediate impulse and guidance of a particular divinity ; but even this, new as it might be, and countenancing, as it strongly did, the opinions advanced, that the defendant rejected the popular theology, even this was heard rather with a feeling of envy at his enjoying a greater ad- vantage than his judges, than with a doubt of its truth. What, then, was wanting to the full acquittal of Socrates? Nothing but that which he disdained to give: a shew of submission to the dicasis who tried him, a little supplication to that crowd of fullers, carpenters and braziers, who composed the courtsj of law, as they also formed the ecclesise or * By an oligarchy, Xenophon most probably meant his favourite government, the Lacedaemonian ; which the Athenian writers seem to have called an oligar- chy, a monarchy or a democracy, according as the executive power seemed to them most virtually to reside in the senate (jepovTSf,) the two kings, or the ephori. Arist. in Politicis, 1. ii. c. 7. ■j" The judicial system of Athens will come more properly under consideration in our author's comedy of the Wasps ; but a note or two on the subject will be necessary to give effect to the present argument. Nearly onelhird of the population of Athens were, in part, supported by their attendance upon tlie courts of law in the quality of dicasts, an office something between the judge and juryman of modern times. In the constitution of these judicial tribunals, from which there was no appeal, and which were not account- able for their decisions, Aristotle considers the whole power of the Athenian democracy to consist; and from them he derives that disposition to tyranny which, in conformity with Plato, Xenoplion, and Aristophanes, he ascribes to his countrymen. In Polit. lib. ii. c. 12. If Socrates was tried in the court of Heliaea, which, in spite of the dogmatical assertion of de Pauw to the contrary, rests upon most respectable authority, six thousand dicasts might have sat in 72 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. legislative assemblies. The accounts of Plato and Xenophon are too decisive on this point to admit of any doubt; the charge of impiety, it is clear, would have been abandoned, and the gods left to avenge their own cause, had Thearion the baker, and Simon the currier, and Theo- phrastus the maker of lyres and the rest of the dicasts stood uncurtailed of their usual allowance of submission,* tears, supplication and prostra- judgment upon him. That there was a very full attendance on the occasion, we have Plato's express testimony. A very large portion of the population of Athens thus becomes involved in the guilt of the murder of Socrates : and if cities suffer for crimes as well as individuals, (an opinion not unknown to the ancients. Isocrates in Orat. de Pace, 381.) there is nothing ridiculous surely in ascribing the subsequent and still continuing degradation of Greece, to the di- vine vengeance which marked that unholy deed. * This trait in the character of the Athenian dicast is painted, with much hu- mour, in the play just referred to; the weakest, according to W. Schlegel, of all the writings of Aristophanes, and which, after the reception of his play of the preceding year, could not be expected to be the strongest. In fact, after the re- jection of the Clouds, a visible alteration takes place in the Aristophanic come- dies : the author, as if hopeless of effecting his better purpose, almost abandons the office of serious instruction, and many of his plays are mere jeux d'esprit ; giving, certainly, a high idea of the wit and humour of an Athenian mob, but never commanding that regard, and even respect, which the lower orders of so- ciety in our own and other countries so often command. As the character of common Athenians is not treated with any great lenity in the course of this work, it is but fair that they should have all the benefit of the good humour, with which they allowed their failings to be reproved in their own days. This can- not be better done than by two or three extracts from the play just mentioned. The best scene in it is where a father and son consider the merits and demerits of the judicial system of Athens; thefather being a tough dicast of the old school, the son an improved gentlemen of the later day. Father. At your word, offi go, and at starting Pll show, convincing the stiffest opinion ; That regalia and throne, sceptre, kingdom and crown are but dirt to judicial dominion. First in pleasure and glee, who abound more than we; who with luxury nearer are wedded 1 Then for panic and frights, the world through none excites, what your dicast does, e'en tho' grayheaded. Soon as ever I creep from my bed and break sleep, through the courts runs a warning sensation ; There the mighty — the sly — men of four cubits high, wait my coming in hot trepidation. First a hand soft as wool — entre nous, lately full from the public exchequer and treasure, Fast upon me is laid ; and my knees captive made, supplications pour in without measure— PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 73 tions. The soul of Socrates — that Socrates, who, with every qualifi- cation requisite to carry him to the highest dignities of state, remained, for the sake of higher employments, nobly poor, disdained the compro- " Father — neighbour and friend — help and mercy extend — mayhap when in ofiice and station. Or when serving the mess, you took care to f.rpress, in private, a small compensation." Knave and hang-dog ! my care, from a swing in the air, sav'd his heels on a former occasion. Or the rogue, and be curst! had not known — Son, {writing on his fallcts.) Item first: — suit . . . petition . . . and warm supplication. Father. Loaded large thus with prayer, in the court I take chair, from my brow wrath and choler clean clearing ; As for promises made out of doors of my aid — with the four winds of heaven their veering. Then a thousand tones drop, all attun'd to one stop — mercy — pardon — release — liberation; Of the whole race of men, like a dicast who then receives compliment, court, adoration 1 His pawns and his pledges one defendant alleges; and his poverty's ills all detailing, The items are thrown with such skill, that my own in the balance to nothing are failing. With mythical tales one my fancy regales, t'other dips into jEsop and fable; While a third slily throws out his squibs and bon-mots, my passion and wrath to disable. Turn I still a deaf ear 1 better suitors are near : — led by hand and in court quick appearing. The accus'd to his aid calls his imps — boy and maid ; — I bend gracious and deign them a hearing. With bent heads ... in tones sweet . . . pretty lambkins ! they bleat: — the father, submissively falling, Does me suit, as a god, for he knows, at my nod, his accounts pass without overhauling. (miWcs,) " If the tones of a lamb sooth your ear, sure I am, that this boy's, my lord, will not be hateful ; If beauty more warms — sir, this girl hath her charms, and sure she would not be ungrateful." Downward straight goes my ire, like the tones of a lyre, when the pins and the pegs are unscrewing : — (turning to his Son) Speak, explain, what dost say, call you this rule and sway, when the rich to your scoffs are thus suing 1 — In Vespis, 548. The author's opinion on the regulations, which made the dicasteria courts of appeal in the last instance, and exempted the members of them, on all occasions, 10 74 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. raise. It was not of such persons that he chose to supplicate permis- sion to add a few more years to a life already far enough advanced to make it a matter of choice rather than of repugnance, to lay down the burden : he openly avowed the determination, and he boldly paid the penalty. — But the guilt of his death lay not the less on those who caused it : on that populace, with whom democracy, as the honest Isocrates observes, was only another name for intemperance, as liberty was for lawlessness : with whom equality of laws O^rovo/xw; implied the right of saying what they pleased ; on that populace, whose singular consti- tution gave them some of the advantages, and all the insolence of wealth, without its responsibility, and which subjected them to the real ills of from the euthyne, it is of more importance to state, than this description of the triumphant chucklings of a dicast over the official terrors of his situation. Father. Crowded house, warm debate, mark some pris'ner of state : — doubts ensue — hesitation — adjournment : To prevent further stir. Lords and Commons refer the case to judicial discernment. Then some pleader stands forth, and that scoundrel, whose worth show his synonyms, "fawner" — "shield-dropper" — And their note is the same, " While / live," both exclaim, " the Commons have no interloper." But the votes most he wins there, his speech who begins, "Mr Speaker, I move with submission. After one single turn, that the courts all adjourn, nor labour a second decision." Even he whose voice stills thunder, hammers and mills, Cleon, dares not devour, jeer, or scoff us. But with flyflap in hand, taking humbly his stand, beats and brushes the vermin clean off us. — In iisdem, 590. Among other instances of roguery, practised under cover of this judicial ex- emption from the account, to which all other official situations were subjected, the following may be selected, as most easy to be appreciated by modern feelings. Some father is gone dead, defunct — well anon? leaves a girl, good ; — an heiress, much better; — The old put would confer a bedfellow on her, and his Will leaves him drawn to the letter. Lords of locks, seals, and keys, straight the parchments we seize, while a codicil neatly appended Cheats the wary and wise, and the girl's made a prize to some youngster who 's better befriended. And the deed boldly done, further mark me, there's none dare report or inquiry request on't; "While another thus doing, there'd be forthwith ensuing Board, Commission, Report, and the rest on't. — In iisdem. 583'. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 75 poverty, without enforcing its peculiar virtues. To that populace — in whom an English mob might witness much of their own easy credu- lity, without their unsuspecting honesty ; and in whom France might trace her frivolity without her good breeding, and her fair exteriour with more than her innate corruption: — to that populace, and not to the le- gitimate ridicule of a Dionysian festival, must be ascribed the death of Socrates. It was but one crime more thrown into a cup already over- flowing with guilt; and they who had but just seen a reverse of fortune pass Over without its fulness of expected retribution — when for remem- brance of national guilt and deserved punishment no eye in Athens slept — these persons probably thought, that it woidd not add much to the horrours of such another night, when to many a former bloody tra- gedy — the deaths of Paches and Milliades, — tlie fate of *Hestiaca, — the hard lot of Scione, — the cruel fortunes of Torone, Melos, and iEgina, should be added the murder of an old man, whom a Delpliicf oracle pro- nounced to be the wisest, and two afiectionate and devoted pupils de- clared to be the best and must virtuous of men. It is felt that these remarks ought now to close, and that any further observations may, perhaps, have the effect of weakening the preceding arguments. But he, who has been lingering over the delightful pages of Xenophon and Plato, willingly deceives himself by supposing, that a few remarks on the personal history of the two great biographers of Socrates, the friend of Agcsilaus and Cyrus, and tlie master of the Aca- demy, may yet be allowed Iiim, and that in perusing them, the relations between their great master and the comic poet may be still further elu- cidated. Early in life, Xenophon had been thrown into those situations, which make a man think and act for himself; which teach him practi- cally how much more important it is, that there should be fixed princi- ples of right and wrong in the minds of men in general, than that there should be a knowledge of letters or a feeling of their elegance in the minds of a icw. The writer, who has thrown equal interest into the ♦ Thucydidos, 1. i. 114. ii. 27. iv. 57. v. 11(5. Tlie bitter recriminations made by Isocrates, in his speech called the Panegyrical upon the Spartan decemviri, form no justification of the atrocities committed by his own countrymen, and only add to the horrour and disgust which Grecian history is too often calculated to inspire. j" To the deductions made in this discourse on the subject of Socrates' virtue, must also be added some deductions as to the authenticity of this celebrated oracle. Van Dale, in his celebrated treatise de Oraculis (Dissert. Secunda, p. 195.) considers it as a sheer imposition. A much stronger argument than either Van Dale, or Athenaeus has urged, seems to lie in the character of the original promulgator of it; the shatter-brain Chaerephon, in Avhom a sort of crazy de- votion to Socrates appears to have swallowed up the nearer affections, which ought to have belonged to him. Lucian, (and the utmost confidence may be placed in the tact of that most shrewd observer) appears, by a little parenthetical expression, to have thought on this subject nearly as the present writer does. 76 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. account of a retreating army, and the description of a scene of coursing ; who has described with the same fidelity a common groom, and a per- fect pattern of conjugal fidelity, such a man had seen life under aspects, which taught him to know that there were things of infinitely more im- portance than the turn of a phrase, the music of a cadence, and the other niceties, which are wanted by a luxurious and opulent metropolis. — He did not write, like his fellow-disciple, for the suppers and the symposiac meetings of Athens — he had no eye, like Plato, to the jokers by pro- fession (rsxaiTOToicj) whose business it wasto despatch books and authors between the courses, and to fill up those intervals, when guests look round to see who is guilty of the last pause in conversation — his Socra- tes was not to be exhibited, as we believe the real Socrates often exhibit- ed himself, a sort of " bon enfant," a boon companion for the petits maitres of the Ilyssus ; who sought to win, by dropping even the decent gravity of a preceptor, and who endeavoured to reclaim by affect- ing a show of what in his heart he must have loathed and detested. Es- tranged from his own country, at first by choice, and very soon after- wards by necessity, Xenophon became, almost before the age of man- hood, a citizen of the world ; and the virtuous feelings, which were ne- cessary in a mind constituted as his was, let loose from the channels of mere patriotism, took into their comprehensive bosom the welfare of the world. Life, which had commenced with him in a manner singu- larly active and romantically perilous, was very soon exchanged for that quiet solitude, which either finds men good or makes them such. In his delightful retirement at Scillus,* amid those enchanting rural scenes, where a bad man finds himself an anomaly in the beautiful and harmonious works of nature around him, Xenophon had ample leisure to meditate on all that he had seen or heard. The " digito monstrarier," that great stumblingblock of weak heads, and of those who do not know how trifling the applause of the world is to him who appeals only to his own breast for the motives of his actions, could not here apply to Xenophon : to him the present time was as nothing ; he lived only to the past and for the future. In such a situation, the lessons of morality received from Socrates would rise up in his mind — how much aided by early intimacy with Cyrus, and by the knowledge thereby acquired of the sentiments of chivalry and honour, inherent in monarchical govern- ments, and how much improved by subsequent connexion with the most virtuous state of Greece, and with Agesilaus, the most distinguished man in that state — his own beautiful writings suiFiciendy testify. His own high talents, aided by such experience and such connexions, would *It is difficult to imagine a more rational or a more delightful life, than a few words of Diogenes Laertius describe Xenophon as leading in that "loop-hole of retreat :" Books — study — composition; — the healthy sports of the field, and the enjoyments of social recreation ; — nothing seems wanting to the picture, which our imaginations are accustomed to draw of an accomplished heathen philosopher. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 77 teach him what to omit, and what to press in a work, not intended mere- ly for the wits and savants of Athens, but meant to be one of those eternal possessions, those x-THf^uTx k ««, which great minds generate and perfect in solitude and retirement. It is the Ethics, therefore, of Socrates, that are chiefly unfolded in the admirable Memorabilia of Xenophon; and after admitting that many of the higher doctrines of antiquity are but negatives* of the Christian precepts, he must be dead to the moral sense, who does not feel a burst of exultation within him, at seeing how much even unassisted nature is able to produce. But the intellect, (and, from the extraordinary mimetic powers of the narrator, it may be sur- mised,) the manners of the real Socrates were left to be displayed by a * How much this is the caso in the great Christian precept of" doing as we would be done by," and the maxim of antiquity, which approaches nearest to it, has been well shown in Mitford's History of Greece, (vol. v. p. 137.) A de- duction equally important must be made from the annunciation which, in lan- guage the most eloquent, tells us that it is belter to suffer injustice than to com- mit it; that he, who commits injustice, increases his misery by escaping, and not by submitting to punishment — and that the real end and proper object of eloquence is to denounce and convict such as have been criminal, even though ourselves, or our dearest connexions be involved in the guilt. The same per- son, who delivers these admirable maxims, declares, on the contrary, that we ought to avenge ourselves on our enemies by endeavouring to hinder them from wiping off, by self-accusation, the torments of the conscience. " If our enemy," says Socrates in the same dialogue, " have committed an injury against any one, we ought to take every precaution, both by word and action, that he may not suffer for his injustice, nor be brought before the dicast. If he do come before the judge, it is our business to plot and scheme, that he may escape, without suffering for his delinquency. Does his crime consist in the robbery of much gold ? it is incumbent on us to try that he be not obliged to refund ; on the con- trary, we should endeavour that he may retain it, and spend it upon himself and his friends, unjustly and impiously. If he have committed crimes worthy of death, we ought to take care that his life be spared ; we should try, if possible, that he may be made to live for ever, immortal in wretchedness ; and if this be out of the case, we should see that he be made to live in this state as long as is possible." It is surely necessary to contrast with such maxims the doctrine, which teaches us how to treat even those who curse us. One comparison more might be made ; but in such a work as this, it becomes us only to make a dis- tant reference to the counterpart. In reading the Phaedon of Plato, it must strike every reader, I think, that the parting scene between Socrates and his children in prison is but barely decent ; that the show part of the drama is brought for- ward with a little precipitation, and that a little more tenderness on the part of the philosopher would have added still more effect to the magnanimity with which the fatal cup is taken and drunk. We have no right to expect that the death of Socrates should be perfect. The simple verses, which shew the best affections of the soul, triumphing amid the severest and most intense sufferings of body, arise, in our minds, without the necessity of bringing them more imme- diately under the reader's eye. 78 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. man, to whom, when it is said that Xenophon can bear no comparison in point of genius, an inferiority is ascribed to him, which he shares in common with all mankind ; the Stageirite alone excepted, whose En- telecheia may perhaps be put on a par with the Erus, or inspiration of the great master of the academy. We leave him who has not yielded to the arguments here brought forward for the justification of Aristo- phanes, to have his indignation neutralized by the Dialogues of Plato. Let him peruse these and he will see that Socrates might very easily dismiss the Clouds of Aristophanes, as the best-natured of men dimiss- ed the fly, which had buzzed about him and annoyed hira : — " Go, lit- tle creature, there is room enough in the world for you and for me." A grasp and a capacity of mind the most astonishing — a spirit inqui- sitive and scrutinizing — a subtlety painfully acute — a comprehensive- ness which could embrace with equal ease the smallest and most lofty knowledge — a suppleness which, with almost incredible facility, could descend from the deepest abstraction to the commonest topics of the world — a temper which, in the heat of disputation, could preserve the most perfect self-possession, and throw into disquisitions, which must have been the result of long study, solitude and profound meditation, all the graces of society and the qualifying embellishments of the most perfect goodbreeding ; — these are qualities which seem to have been inherent in the mind of Plato, and with these he has accordingly en- dowed the person whom he in general selected for the organ of con- veying their joint sentiments to the world. In this union of opposite qualities, Plato may be said to resemble the Homeric chain of gold: if one end rested on earth, the other had its termination in heaven. A residence in courts (and the court of the Dionysii seems to have been no ordinary one) adds to his attractions some of those charms so rarely to be found in republican writers: that tone of good society, which sifts without exhausting, and plays upon the surface as if to take breath from having sounded the bottom; — that correctness of observation which, acting rather as the annalist than the spy in society, gives to raillery it- self the character of wit, and to scandal a half tone of biography ; — that tact, rapid as light and as unerring as instinct, which, charitable as it may be to unassuming and natural manners, seizes instantly upon pre- tension, and lays it bare with pitiless severity ; — that delicate intuition, which in manners, and in authorship watches with jealousy that nice point, where self-condemnation beginning, the commendation of others is sure to cease : all this may be seen in Plato, and if less perfectly than in some modern writers, it was only because that sex, in whose society it is best learnt, had not yet been able to throw off the shackles of de- mocratical tyranny, or to attain the accomplishments of a liberal educa- tion, without forfeiting wliat ought to be dearer to them than any accom- plishments. At once a geometrician and a poet,t he understanding and the fancy find in Plato a purveyor equally bountiful : for the one he PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. 79 supplies solid food, and he captivates the other by the most beautiful fables and tales. To his treasures the east and the south equally con- tributed ; he pours forth the one in all the pomp of oriental richness and profusion, with the lavish hand of youthful extravagance ; and his intercourse with Egypt enables him to cast over his writings the impo- sing reserve of that mysterious eld, who has surrounded the impotence of her old age with a solemn reverence, by affecting the possession of treasures, of which she mysteriously withholds the key. To Plato the past, the present, and the future seem alike ; he has amassed in him- self all the knowledge of the first ; he paints the present to the life, and by some wonderful instinct, he has given dark hints, as if the most im- portant events, which were to happen after his time, had not been wholly hidden from his sight. Less scientific in the arrangement of his mate- rials than his great scholar the Slageirite, he has infinitely more variety, more spirit, more beauty ; evincing, at every step, that it was in his own choice to become the most profound of philosophers, the most pointed of satirists, the greatest of orators, or the most sublime of poets ; or, by a skilful combination of all, to form such a character as the world had never yet seen, nor was ever after to witness. Nor is the language in which his thoughts are conveyed less remarkable than the thoughts themselves. In his more elevated passages, he rises, like his own Pro- metheus, to heaven, and brings down from thence the noblest of all thefts — Wisdom with Fire: but, in general, calm, pure, and unaffected, his style flows like a stream which gurgles its own music as it runs :* and his works rise like the great fabric of Grecian literature, of which they are the best model, in calm and noiseless majesty, like the palace of Aladdin rearing itself from an ethereal base, or like that temple, equal- ly gorgeous and more real, in which "No workman's steel, no pond'rous axes rung; Like some tall palm the noiseless fabric sprung." That Socrates could have so commanded the spirits of two men so gifted as Xenophon and Plato, that they may be said to have devoted their lives to the delineation of his character and sentiments, is a proof of ascendancy which gives us the most astonishing opinion of his pow- ers. It cannot, however, be sufficiently regretted that he did not take the task upon himself; the most interesting book, perhaps, that ever could have been written, would have been that which traced gradually and minutely the progress of thought in the mind of Socrates, and through what changes and circumstances he arrived at that system of opinions which, if they sometimes remind us of what unassisted nature must be, more often recal to us, " how glorious a piece of work man is ! how noble is reason 1 how infinite in faculties ! in apprehension how like a god!" This, however, has not been done ; and Socrates must now be 80 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. taken as we find him : by thus leaving the task to others, he has per- haps gained something in reputation on the score of intellect, but it can neither be concealed nor denied, that on the side of manners and morals, he has lost much both in purity and dignity. In offering these remarks, the writer is aware, that he shall come across many prejudices and prepossessions ; but they are the result of considerable labour, and, he may say, of anxious investigation ; in making them he has been conscious of no undue bias on his own mind, and he confidently trusts to the truth and to the utility of them for his apology. " Se lo voce sard molesta Nel primo gusto, vital niitrimento Lascera poi quando sara digesta." THE KNIGHTS: THE DEMAGOGUES.* TiiK Comedy of the Kniglits carries vis two years forward into that most interesting period of Grecian history, the Pcloponnesian war. In this Comedy, as in a glass, may be seen the effects of that fatal policy, pursued by Pericles at tlie commencement of the war, and to which the reader's attention has already more than once been directed. Never had corruption made more rapid progress in a state than under the in- fluence of that unfortunate measure, which had broken the simple habits of rustic life, and converted the whole body of Athenians into inhabit- ants of a town. The professed object of this singular composition is the overthrow of tliat powerful demagogue, whom the author had pro- fessed in his Acharnians (Act II,) that it was his intention at some future day "to cut into shoe-leather;" and his assistants on the occasion are the very persons, for whose service the exploit was to take place, — the rich proprietors, who among the Athenians constituted the class of Horse- men or Knights. t For this purpose Athens is here represented as a house : Demus (a personification of the whole Athenian people) is the master of it, Nicias and Demosthenes, names too familiar to the reader of history to need explanation, are his slaves, and Cleon is his confidential servant and slavedriver. The levelling disposition of tlie Athenians could not have been presented with a more agreeable picture. If the dramatis per- sonae are few, the plot of the piece is still more meagre ; it consists merely of a series of humiliating pictures of Cleon, and a succession of proofs to Demus, that this favourite servant is wholly unworthy of the trust * The former of tliese is the title given in the Didascalia;, and is that by which the piece is most generally known; but it was a title very likely to mislead the English reader, and the first impressions of a reader are those which are least easily eradicated. The celebrated Wieland, who has translated this and other plays of Aiistophanes into his native tongue, and whose extensive erudition and extreme impartiality make him a most invaluable assistant to a person engaged in a similar labour, uniformly calls it the Demao-ogues. f In the Athenian state, the Knights ranked next to those of the highest quality and fortune. They were not a very numerous body ; consisting of such only as possessed estates equal to the furnishing a horse at the rider's own ex- pense; and this in the rocky and barren country of Attica was by no means in- considerable. U 82 THE knights; and confidence reposed in him. The manners are strictly confined to Athens and might ahuost be thought to belong to a people, who imagined ■with the Indian that liis own little valley comprehended 'the whole world; and that the sun rose on one side of it, only to set again on the other. Of all the comedies of Aristophanes, scarcely one can be said to ex- ceed the Knights in value ; not so much as a specimen of the dramatic art, as an historical document, giving a strong, full, and faithful picture of the most singular people that ever existed. We are here admitted literally into the interior of Attica; — into the house of the allegorical Demus ; and certainly the master of the habitation is such as we should wish to contemplate at a very respectful distance. Irritable, jealous, and suspicious — eaten up with oracles, and a prey to the most miserable superstition — fickle in his feelings, and inconstant in his pursuits — a greedy devourer of his own praises, and on some occasions, it must be confessed, equally patient of abuse — with a curious mixture of sense and imbecility, of acuteness and blindness, of insolence and servility, if the Demus of Aristophanes somtimes reminds us of the John Bull of our own country,* it is certainly only for the purpose of making us dwell with more satisfaction upon that representative of our national character. The eccentric and mirthful muse of Aristophanes throws a gaiety over the most unpromising subject; but, cruel and capricious — alternately tyrants and slaves, — at once sharpers and dupes — devoted to the lowest of their appetites — gluttonous and intemperate — idle amid all their activity, and sensual amid privation and poverty, the life of the common Athenians cannot but fill us with contempt and disgust; — without object and without plan, without real activity or true enjoyment, it exliibitsa picture at once ridiculous, loathsome, and fearful, and shews the extreme corruption to which a state may be rapidly conducted by the united influence of republicanism and demagogues. f Whatever may be tjiought of the line of conduct by which Pericles paved the way to the possession of supreme power in Athens, and Avhatever diflTerence of opinion may exist as to the motives which hurried him into the Peloponnesian war, this play affords sufficient evidence that he alone was able to have conducted it with honour, and that none * Or the Brother Jonathan of ours. t That a state, constituted as is represented in this play, could have existed for a week, seems hardly possible; but Wieland has justly observed, that the earlier events of the French revolution are a convincing proof that the author might have written all that he has, without giving reason to imagine that he has drawn merely a fancy-picture. In that singular revolution, says the same writer, the Demus of Aristophanes became a reeil person, and ihe parts of the Paphlagonian and the Sausage-vender were played witii an easiness and sup- pleness which secure the comic writer from all suspicion of having overstepped the boundaries of what is possible in human nature. OR THE DEMAGOGUES. 83 but lie could be safely entrusted with that fulness of power, which, in the hands of the leading ^minister of Athens, put at his disposal the Athenian commonwealth with all its appurtenances, " its revenues," as the contemporary historians describe it, " its armies, fleets, islands, the sea, friendships and alliances with kings and various potentates, and influence that commanded several Grecian states, and many barbarous nations." By the death of this accomplished politician, which happened at a time singularly unfortunate for his country, this ricli prize had again become a subject for competition ; and the two parties, which prevailed more or less in every Grecian city, and wliicli his all-com- manding talents had kept in repose, had already iilled Athens with all those conflicting passions by which human nature is agitated. At the head of the aristocratic interest appeared Nicias, the son of Niceratus ; a man rich, amiable, and generous ; with considerable talents, both mi- litary and political, but unequal to the times and to the particular peo- ple among whom he was born ; while Democracy, after veering some time between Lysicles and Eucrates, the one, according to Aristophanes, a seller of tow, and the other a dealer in cattle, had at last taken repose by showering the whole tide of her afl'ections upon the noisy, turbulent, and worthless Cleon. The son of a tanner, and himself bred to the trade ; without those generous feelings which seem inherent in high birth ; and without that regard for character, which it is the purpose of education to inspire, Cleon possessed those corporeal powers which, in the eyes of a mob, often supply the place of both : — with a bulky body, a voice potent even beyond the extreme extent of fvalue attached to such a qualification among the Greeks, with a most republican indiflerence to all exterior decorations of person, and a face bearing on it the marks of vulgar intemperance. Nature herself seems to have formed Cleon for a demagogue. His interior qualifications were just what his exterior promised ; he being, as Mr Mitford observes, of extraordinary impu- dence and little courage ; as slack in the field as he was forward and * The ofTico, wliich conferred this extensive power, was that of -ra^/^tc, or the public treasurer. It was generally given for a term of five years ; but if the holder of it conducted himself to the satisfaction of the people, he was generally reinvested with it. ■f" Among the Greeks, where civil hnsiness was transacted before large num- bers, and where in war little was communicated hy signals, a loud voice was a very important endowment. The name of Stcntor has even grown into a pro- verb. The service which Thrasybulus of Styra rendered to Alcibiades by the loudness of his voice on a very trying occasion, is recorded by Plutarch in his life of that extraordinary man. See, also, Herod. 1. iv. c. 141. 7. c. 117. Cleon appears to have possessed lungs of astonishing strength. Aristophanes fre- quently compares his voice with tlic Cycloboras, one of those torrents which precipitated themselves with an overpowering noise from the rocks in the neigh- bourhood of Athens. 84 THE KNIGHTS ; noisy in the assembly, and as base in practice as he was corrupt in principle. That such a man should ever have stood in the situation of head of a party seems to us almost incredible : but he possessed one re- deeming qualification in an eminent degree ; and among a nation which pardoned everything to the pleasure of indulging its ears,* the coarse but ready eloquencef of Cleon, exerted in those ways which were most calculated to please an Athenian audience — in boasts of his own integ- rity, and accusations| of all the respectable men of rank — this formed a splendid addition to his character, which threw into the shade all his other defects. To qualifications such as these, the amiable diffidence of Nicias formed but a very weak opposition ; and Demosthenes, with little pow- ers of oratory, and even in his own profession more fitted to act upon the suggestions of others than to devise anything original of his own, was ill calculated to supply the deficiencies of his colleague. All op- position, therefore, in the General Assembly, to the low and petulant Cleon, seems gradually to have declined, and graver men saw with grief and indignation that the ample power, which had once been vested in the hands of a Miltiades, a Themistocles, an Aristides, and a Cyraon, was now concentrating fast in the worthless and ignoble Cleon. It was in this exigency that a poet stepped forward to support their declining cause, and to effect upon the stage what had been without avail atempted in the assembly. That personal hatred was one of the motives which led to the bold and dangerous attempt, there can be no doubt; but that Aristophanes was in the pay of Nicias's party, or that he was instigated by mercenary views, as Wieland suggests, there seems no good ground for affirming. He had evidently formed a high idea of the profession to which he had given himself; he had devoted much time and indus- try to the developement of those extraodinary talents with which he was endowed ; and the keen sensibility, with which, it is evident, amid all * The spirit of a man, says the Xerxes of Herodotus, (and the strong con- trasts in that monarch's character seem to show the people for whom the his- torian had most adapted,) resides in his ears ; when he hears what is agreeable to him, pleasure spreads itself over every part of his body; when the contrary happens, he is filled with pain and exacerbation of mind. Lib. vii. c. 39. ■j- The history of the Italian states oflFers proofs no less remarkable than the Grecian, of the powers which eloquence possesses over the susceptible minds of the inhabitants of warm climates. The eloquence of a poor fisherman (Mas Aniello) could quell a sedition ; the oratory of an innkeeper's son (Cola di Rienzi) could restore for a time the fallen dignities of Rome. The preaching of a single monk (Jacob des Bussolari) baffled the whole power of Milan ; and while the plain of Paquara witnessed twelve nations as the audience of Jean de Vicence ; John of Bohemia, without the power of being able to read, saw thrones and sceptres offered to him in abundance as the reward of his powers of per- suasion. Histoire des Republiques Italiennes, tomes ii. v. vi. jf. See the speech of Diodotus, Thuc. lib. iii. OR THE DEMAGOGUES. 85 his apparent thoughtlessness and extravagance, that he felt the triumph of success and the mortilicatiou of failure, shews that to be the first comic poet of his day was the great and ruling object of his ambition. Where a warm and ardent love of fame is felt, the meaner passions are seldom found to exist. That Aristophanes reckoned upon the assist- ance of the aristocratic party is evident from his own declaration ; but his best security, he knew, rested in the display of those talents, which had already gained him much attention, and which by their ex- traordinary mixture of elegance and coarseness, of wit and buffoonery, of apparent simplicity and real acumen, seemed peculiarly adapted to catch the tastes and fascinate the minds of his countrymen. The at- tack itself, the manner in which it was conducted, and the consequences which resulted from it, will all demand a few words. Accustomed as we are in England* to see the most exalted charac- ters subjected with impunity to the lash of the pencil and the press, it may be thought that the danger of attacking a demagogue like Cleon, especially when the privileged licence of the Okl Comedy is considered, was by no means very appalling. An incident mentioned in the piece itself will shew that this was far from being the case. It was the privi- lege of the Old Comedy to attack persons not merely by their names, but by means of masks to give an exact representation of the person satirized. It was thus that Lamachus and Euripides had been served up to the public ridicule in the comedy of the Acharnians; it was thus that Nicias and Demosthenes were no doubt exhibited in the present play ; and in the same manner a faithful pourtraiture was afterwards given of the son of Sophroniscus. In drawing the character of Demus, the author had already ventured upon what few others would have dared to attempt; for though the sovereign multitude encouraged personal satire, it was always understood that their own sacred person was to be excepted. Satire against the people collectively, says Xenophon,t the people do not allow. What the courage of Aristophanes, however, had dared to describe, the artists did not want courage to pourtray, nor the actors to represent ; and a Demus was brought before the audience, in such cos- tume, no doubt, and with such features as the fruitful mind of the origi- nal creator of the character might suggest. But though the mob itself, it was thought, might thus be treated with impunity, the idol of the mob created a more reverential terrour. No artist would venture to give a representation of Cleon's face, and no actor would expose himself to the resentment of the all-powerful demagogue by playing him off be- fore that audience, who were at once his servant and his master. The same person, tlierefore, who had delineated the character in his closet, was obliged himself to sustain it on the stage; and the lees of wine * And more particularly in America, t De Rep. Athen. c. 2. s. 18, 86 THE KNIGHTS ; rubbed upon his face served to convey some idea of the flushed and bloated countenance which the maskniaUer had not dared to represent. The poet, in the character of Cleon, and his dramatic opponent, (through the medium of whom the ricHcule was to be administered,) once face to face upon the stage, a combat of the most extraordinary kind ensued ; and those who have been accustomed to hear of Athenian urbanity and politeness will recoil with astonishment, perhaps, from scenes, which were received with enthusiasm by the countrymen and fellow citizens of Plato, Xenophon and Thucydides. Whatever were tlie acuteness, ingenuity and natural taste of an Athenian audience, (and that they possessed all these in a wonderful degree cannot be doubt- ed,) we want no other evidence than this play to prove that they had yet to learn that art, at once so diflicult and so sublime, as an acute* observer has termed it, by which men are rendered mutually satisfied with each other and with themselves; and that the bienseance, which leads to the belief that a man respects himself, and the politeness which leads to the belief that he respects others, were qualities either unknown or little practised among the lower Athenians. Never very scrupulous in his ideas, nor in the language in which they are clothed, Aristophanes seems to consider an attack, upon Cleon as an apology for overstepping all bounds of decorum ; to assail him was, in his own words, to stir up the effluvia of a tanyard, and by the very act of rousing him the whole atmosphere becomes tainted and poisoned. Cleon appears to have been in his imagination as the centre of a circle, into which all that society exhibits of the mean and the ridiculous, all that folly contains of the weak and the imbecile, and all that vice displays of the odious and dis- gusting, was as a matter of course, to be drawn. That good hu- mour, which, in spite of the opposite opinion generally entertain- ed of him, formed, I think, a conspicuous part of the character of Aristophanes, displays itself here but rarely ; — he had set his all upon a cast, and the danger he was running evidently sits heavy upon his mind. His Chorus, who are generally to his plays what the female faces have been observed to be to the pieces of Hogarth, a means of keeping the acrimonious feelings within the limits of legitimately pleasurable sensation, here assume a ferocity of character — the poet has Avritten their parts with gall, and armed their hands with a dagger. The German critics, whose feelings are as correct as their learning is pro- found, have observed the difference between the Knights «f Aristophanes and his other plays. It is a struggle for life and death, says Wieland; it is a true dramatic philippic, says Schlegel. In attacking Cleon so continually upon the point where he seemed least assailable, viz. the affair at Pylus, the poet has shown that deep knowledge of the people collectively, which forms the most consider- * De Pauw. OK THE DEMAGOGUKS 87 able feature in his literary character. He knew that the exploit per- formed at Pylus, however it might command the acclamations of the mob at first, was, in fact, a line of demarcation between them and their favourite. For though with a little examination, (a trouble which the giddy citizens of Athens were not likely to give themselves,) Cleon's share in tliis achievement would have been found to amount to nothing, yet, taken in a general view, it conferred a sort of respectability upon his character ; and respect is the last feeling which the mob wish to be demanded of them by the candidate for their favour. To be in full possession of their affections, he must be as vile and worthless as them- selves. It is for this reason that Cleon's achievement is so continually served up to the audience. Of two consequences one was likely to re- sult. If no accession to Cleon's popularity had been gained by this boasted exploit, to treat the exj)loil itself with ridicule was one of the surest means of preventing an increase of favour with the mob : if, on the contrary, an opinion of Cleon's capacity had gained ground, it was politic to nauseate llie audience with a continual recitation of the only event upon which any real notion of his capacity could be grounded. The peasant, who signed the vote for the banishment of Aristides, had no other reason for it but that he was tired of hearing him continually styled the Just. The consequences which resulted from this singular exhibition may be told in a few words ; but those few words supply ample materials for thought : the piece was applauded in the most enthusiastic manner, the satire on the sovereign multitude was forgiven, the poet was crowned with the prize of victory, and — Cleon remained in as great favour as ever. Nothing can testify more amply to Athenian love of wit, to Athenian penetration; but while much must be conceded to the good humour which could so patiently endure the detail of its faults : that good hu- mour itself is a p.oof how fixed was tlie determination of the audience to abide in all the errours of their national character : for those who laugh at the exposure of their faults are least likely ever to amend them. The Knights, even as a drama, has always held a very high rank, and not undeservedly. The character of Demus is an immortal proof of rich *invention, discrimination, and acuteness ; and the sausage-seller is the very triumph of vulgarity. That bold and spirited morality which displays itself in all the works of Aristophanes, not unaccompanied, it must be owned, with the most perverse depravity, is nowhere more conspicuous than in his Knights. Where the author is bad, he leaves * After the exhibition of the Knights, an allegorical Domus seems to have become a favourite subject with the painters and sculptors of Athens. (See Meursius de Peir c. 4. Pausan, 1. i. c. 3.) That of Parrhasius was particu- larly distinguished, as displaying in an adndrable manner the various inconsist- encies of the Athenian character. Plin. lib. xxxv. § 3G. 88 THE knights; all competition at a distance ; but where he is good, the most delicate taste can hardly wish for a finer banquet. The fulness of this enjoy- ment, however, must be left to those wlio can read him in the original Greek : to fight the battles of the poet in any other language than liis own is like sending the steed of the great Cid to battle with the lifeless body of his master upon his back : if any victory be gained, their success must be set down to the credit of the reader's imagination. As a piece of mere language, indeed, the Knights is, perhaps, without parallel ; the figures in the piece may be those of Teniers and Ostade, but the colour- ing in the original has all the richness of Reubens. The diction of Aristophanes is to his ideas what the best accompaniments of Mozart are to his worst melodies ; it resembles the liberality of a man whose present of a silver coin is wrapped up in a note of many times its value ; like Algebraic language, it may be said to be rather the creation than the conveyance of thought. Even the low terms, of which so unspar- ing a use is made in this comedy, had a charm, perhaps, for Athenian ears, of which we are not susceptible. The Italians, who in the pecu- liar cast of their gaiety and vivacity, approach very nearly to the Athe- nians, are enthusiastically attached to the low Florentine ; they find in it an expressible grace, and many of their critics to this day think* no- thing written with purity which is not formed upon the language of the lower orders of Florence of the fourteenth century. It is at once con- solatory and mortifying to the translator of Aristophanes to make these observations : consoling, because the impossibility of transplanting the beauties of the original diminishes the temerity of attempting to con- vey an idea of some of the more common passages ; and mortifying, because he feels the injustice done to his author by thus presenting a succession of coarse pictures, unredeemed by that spirit and those graces of language, with which they are clothed in the original ; but powerful as the English language is, it may be doubted whether the strongest hand could raise it to such a height as to meet the original of the Knights. An event in Grecian history, to which allusion has already been made, forms so prominent a part in the ensuing comedy, that without some explanation of it, the piece itself will scarcely be intelligible : a mere outline must suffice here ; the reader who wishes for more intelligence will find his curiosity amply gratified in the pages of Mr Mitford. A squadron of the Athenians, at the instigation and under the direction of * The Malmantile racquistato of Lorenzo Lippi, and the Torrachione deso- late of Paolo Minucci, (the former of which has been illustrated by more com- mentators than any Italian poem except the Divina Commedia) are said to owe most of that high celebrity, which they enjoy among the cultivators of the Tus- can language, to the great portion which they contain of this favourite dialect. Sismondi, Litleralure du Midi, torn. ii. OR THE DEMAGOGUES. 89 Demosthenes, had constructed a small fort at Pylus, on the Messenian coast, with a view of securing a point of attack upon the territories of their opponents, the Lacedaemonians. The latter naturally became alarmed, and made speedy preparations for dispossessing their antago- nists of this advantageous post. Many contests took place between the contending parlies to effect their different purposes. The peculiar na- ture of the harbour at Pylus, and the Island of Sphacteria, which faced it, seemed, at length, to put a few hundreds of the Spartans, who had been landed on the island, into the power of their enemies ; and it re- quires but little acquaintance with the history, organization, and pecu- liar institutions of that singular people, to know that the loss of a few hundred Spartans was equivalent to the loss of a whole army. Alarmed at an event, which was likely to bring disgrace on many of their prin- cipal families, the heads of their government made instant overtures to the Athenians for peace. Tlieir offers were rejected by the General Assembly at the instigation of Cleon : but when the prospect of suc- cess, which had been held out at Pylus, began to wear a less flattering aspect, the Athenians became alarmed in their turn for their own fort and the fleet which supported it ; and it seemed doubtful whether the party of Spartans, which a sanguine imagination had put into their hands, might not yet escape them. The sequel of the story will be best related in the words of the historian, to whom reference has al- ready been made. " Public indignation was rising fast against Cleon, as the evil counsellor of the commonwealth and author of the evils felt or apprehended. He found it necessary, for obviating popular clamour and disgust, to exert himself in the Assembly, and in a very extraor- dinary train of circumstances that followed, his impudence and his for- tune (if in the want of another we may use that term) wonderfully fa- voured him. He began by boldly insisting ' that the circumstances of their fleet and army at Pylus were not so adverse as they were reported ;' this assertion called forward the officers who brought the intelligence ; they desired, that if they were thought unworthy of belief, proper per- sons might be sent to examine into the state of things.' The Assembly assented to this request, and Cleon himself was named among those to be commissioned for the purpose. Pressed by this proposal, which he was aware would not answer his end, and anxious anyhow to throw the weight of the business upon others, he seems, in the moment, to have lost his guard. 'It were idle waste of time,' he said, 'to send commissioners to inquire, when they should rather send generals to execute. If those who directed the military affairs of the Common- wealth were men, it would be easy with the force which they could at all times command to subdue the little band of Spartans in Sphacteria J were he in that station he would engage to effect it.' The unenterpri- sing Nicias, at tiiis time commander-in-chief, being thus called upon, in his anxiety to obviate crimination, miserably betrayed the dignity of hw 12 90 THE KNIGHT, &C. high office. ' As far as depended upon him,' he said, ' Cleon might take what force he pleased, and make the attempt.' Cleon immediate- ly accepted the offer, thinking it not seriously made ; but Nicias per- sisting, Cleon would have retracted, saying 'Nicias, not he, was gene- ral of the Republic' ISicias, however, observing that his proposal had not displeased the Assembly, declared solemnly before the Assembly that for the business of Pylus he waived his right to command. The more, then, < leon appeared still anxious to withdraw, the more the people, as the historian observes, in the usual temper of mobs, insisted that he should make his words good, with clamour requiring that Nicias should resign the command and that Cleon should take it. Thus appoint- ed general, Cleon, though alarmed with the danger, was elated with the extravagant honour; and in the next Assembly held on the business, he resumed his arrogant manner: 'He did not fear the Lacedaemonians, he said, and for the expedition to Pylus, he would desire no Athenian forces: he would only take the Lemnian and Imbrian heavy-armed, at that time in Attica, with the middle-armed of CEnus and four hundred bowmen of the allies; and with that small addition to the armament then at Pylus, he would, within twenty days, either bring the Lacedaemonians in Sphacteria prisoners to Athens, or put them to the sword upon the spot.' Amid the many very serious considerations involved with the business, this pompous boast excited a general laugh in the Assembly : yet even the graver men, says the historian, were, upon the whole, pleased with the event, upon con- sidering that of two good things one must result ; either an important advantaL'e must be gained over the Lacedaemonians, or, what they rather expected, they should be finally delivered from the importunity of Cleon. It soon, however, appeared, that though for a man like Cleon, unversed in military command, the undertaking was rash, and the brag- ging promise abundantly ruliculous, yet the business was not so despe- rate as it was in the moment generally imagined; and, in fact, the folly of the Athenian people, in committing such a trust to such a man, far exceeded that of the man himself, whose impudence seldom carried him beyond the contrnul of his cunning.** Those who wish to pur- sue the story will find their curiosity amply gratified by the pages of the historian, from whom the preceding account is taken. It will be sufficient lo observe here, that by the exertion of a little prudence, and by some fortunate* coincidences, Cleon completely fulfilled his en- gagement, and actually entered the Peiraeus within twenty days after he had quitted it. * Demosthenes bad been principally deterred from attempting a landing upon the island, from the circumstance of its being very thickly wooded : his former campaicrn in /Etolia having snfficienlly apprised him of the use which might be made of such an advantage. An accidental fire, which happened just before the arrival of Cleon, destroyed most of the trees on the island, and removed the main obstacle to a successful attack upon the occupiers of it. Thuc. lib. iv. c. 30. DRAMATIS PERSONiE. Demus, an old Citizen of Jlthens, and in whom the Athenian People are iypijied. Demosthenes, l^^^^^^^p^^^^g^ NiCIAS, 3 The Paphlagonian, (Cleon,) Steward to Demus. Sausage-Seller, {afterwards Agoracritus.) Chorus of Knights. SCENE — Space before Demus's House, THE KNIGHTS; OR THE DEMAGOGUES. ACT 1. SCENE I. Demosthenes. Nicias. The two illustrious generals, whose names stand at the head of the scene, enter the stage, dressed in their proper costume of slaves, and complain bitterly of the hardships they suffer since the introduction of an execrable Paphlagonian into the house of their common master, Demus. After a ridiculous concert of lamentation, derived from the elegies of *01ympus, the celebrated musician > the two slaves being to consider that they have power to quit this mansion, the scene of so much misery lo them. Neither, however, ventures to suggest, in direct terms, the proposal of so heinous a scheme. The ftimid character of Nicias is properly discriminated here, as well as that of the blunt soldier De- mosthenes, who was more fitted for executing the plans of others than devising any of his own, A proposal, which required art and a certain equivoque in the expression, does not pass without a blow at Euripides, whose dangerous sen- timents the poet delighted to expose. It is Nicias who wishes to cover his own want of confidence by clothing his diction in that tragedian's " neat and clever" manner; but Demosthenes will not hear of it : "if you love me, if you have any regard, any bowels of compassion, spare me the mortification of a :t:potherb." But though averse to any dealing with the great tragedian, De- mosthenes is still urgent upon his fellow-slave to exert his invention, and ena- ble them to chant the song of deliverance {apodnum) from their servitude. Nicias at last falls upon a method for expressing a word, which seems to cost the parties as much difficulty in the avowal as the confession which is so deli- cately wrung from Phaedra in the beautiful tragedy of Hippolitus. The colder * Olympus, the Phrj gian, lived in the time of Midas, before the Trojan war, yet his compositions or vsmo/, as ■well the music as the verses, were extant even in Plutarch's days. Plato bestows the highest encomiums upon his compositions, as well as those of Marsyas, calling them most divine. Gray's Notes on Arist. Plato, Minos. It was the delight of the comic poets, from causes which have been already explained, to throw ri- dicule upon the musicians. t This part of Nicias's character has been well caught and pourtrayed in the Lettres Atheniennes of Crebillon ; a work, which gives a vei-y interesting picture of the politics of this period, but mixt up with so much exceptionable matter as scarcely to pay the trouble of consulting it An acute and goodhumoured view of the whole play as a dra- matic work, may be found in the English Athenian Letters, written by the members of a noble family, who have distinguished themselves equally in literature and politics. % This blow at the parentage of Euripides has been already explained. THE KNIGHTS, &C. 93 inflexions of our * language will not allow us to show the facility and pleasantry with which Demosthenes is made finally to slip into the criminal word: and the purity of our manners fortunately forbids all explanation of the action, by which the dialogue was made more piquant to the dissolute and worthless au- dience. The word, thus ingeniously compounded, implied a resolution to desert their old master and take refuge with another; and desertion, uncountenanced as yet by the example of the unprincipled Alcibiades, was held in strong and merited abhorrence. While the general, therefore, admits the gratefulness of the proposal, he suggests that their skins may suffer, if they venture to put it into execution. Nicias then, consistently with those religious feelings which made part of his character, proposes that they should betake themselves as suppliants to the statue of some god. " Statue !" says the rough soldier, " and of some god ! why, prithee, man, dost thou believe that there are such beings as jgods?" I t'^o," replies Nicias. " Your reasons!" "The sufferings I bear, and the little justice with which they are put upon me." The general, no logician, yields implicitly to this argument, and has no other resource to offer but that of laying their case before the spectators ; Nicias assents, but, with his usual dis- trust, begs the audience to give some token first whether the subject was ao-ree- able. A clapping of hands most probably expressed the approbation of the audi- ence, and the task of the narrative falls upon Demosthenes — probably in compli- ment to the actor who performed the part, — it paints ' the sovereign people' with admirable §force and humour. With reverence to your worships, 't is our fate To have a testy, cross-grain'd, bilious, sour Old fellow for our master; one much giv'n * The separable preposition of the German language has enabled Wieland to come something near the original, but the inferiority of the translation is still very percep- tible. JVihias. So sprich denn — Imifen ivir — heraus damit? Demos. Gut! also — Imiffeii luii'— JVikias. Nun hang'an " laiiffen wir" Das wort " davon" — Demos. Davon. JVilcias. Votreflich! nun Sprich erst ganz langsam, langsam, " laufferi wir''' Dann immer haufFiger, und schneller das davon — Du weisstja was ich meyne!— Demos. Laufen — laufen wir Davon, davon, davon. t The question here put into the mouth of Demosthenes was probably congenial with that soldier's sentiments. After making all allowances for dramatic licence and cos- tume, the question of Wieland will occur to every person, who reflects upon the charges which the writer afterwards brought against Socrates : Und eine solclie fi-age durfte der Dichter seinem Demosthenes auf ofientlichem schauplass ungestraft in den mund legen, und das in eben der stadt, wo Sokrates in der folge den Giftbecher trinken musste, weil cr beschuldigt wurder dass er die Gtitter der Athener nicht fiir Gotter halte? :t:Tl>e piety of Nicias appears to have excited the scoffs of his hardier countrymen ; it yet remained for adversity to shew to what sublimity this feeling could raise a mind na- turally feeble and despondent. History presents nothing grander to us than the addresses of Nicias to his soldiers after the reverses in Sicily. § Plato had very probably his eye upon this picture of Aristophanes, in that curious 94 THE KNIGHTS ; To a *bean-diet ; somewliat hard of hearing ; Demus his name, sirs, of the parish f Pnyx here. Some three weeks back or so, this lord of ours Brought home a lusty slave from Paphlagonia, Fresh from the tanyard, tight and yare, and with As nimble fingers and as foul a mouth As ever yet paid tribute to the gallows. This tanner-Paphlagonian (for the fellow Wanted not penetration) bow'd and scrap'd, And fawn'd and wagg'd his ears and tail, dog-fashion : And thus soon slipp'd into the old man's graces. Occasional douceurs of leather-parings. With speeches to this tune, made all his own. " Good sir, the court is up, — you 've judg'd one cause, 'T is time to take the bath ; allow me, sir, — This cake is excellent — pray suj) this broth — This soup will not offend you, though cropfuU — You love an obolus ; pray take these :J:three — Honour me, sir, with your commands for supper." Sad times meanwhile for us ! — with prying looks, Round comes my man of hides, and if he finds us Cooking a little something for our master. Incontinently lays his paw upon it. And modestly in his own name presents it ! It was but th' other day these hands had mixt A Spartan pudding for him; there — at §Pylus : Slily and craftily the knave stole on me, allegorical description which he puts into the mouth of his great master, when pressed to give his reasons why philosophers are not more frequently seen directing the higher departments of state. See his Republic, v. ii. p. 15. Massey. * In giving their suffrages, the Athenian dicasts, or judges, made use of seashells, or pebbles, or beans. The latter was the more common and the more modern practice. Hence the allusion in the text. tor the Pnyx, that scene of so many historical recollections, some account has already been given in the preceding play. As the General Assemblies were usually held on the Pnyx hill, it is very properly made the parish of the allegorical Demus. The fondness of the Athenians for these adjuncts, derived from their tribe or ward, has also been no- ticed in the Acharnians ; a curious proof of its known efficacy upon them occurs in the funeral oration ascribed to Demosthenes, as delivered after the fatal battle of Chseronea. The speech, where so many topics were to be avoided and so many to be touched with a delicate hand, artfully concludes with a catalogue of the wards of Attica, and a separate panegyric upon the heroes, the supposed founders of them. One powerful source of this feeling must have originated in a custom mentioned by the French Anacharsis. Par une institution admiration, ceux d'une tribu, d'un canton, sont enrol is dans la meme cohorte, dans le mcme escadron ; ils marchent, ils combattent a cjts de leurs parents, de leurs amis, de leurs voisins, de leurs rivaux. Quel soldat oserait commettre une lachete en presence de tfemoins si redoutables! Voyage d'Anach. torn. ii. p. 214. % Every person who attended the courts of law, or the General Assembly, received three obols for his labour. ^ It has been explained very largely in the preface to this play what this allusion tends to. OR THE DEMAGOGUES. 95 Ravish'd the feast and to my master bore it. Then none but he, forsooth, must wait at table : (We dare not come in sight) but there he stands All supper-time, and with a leathern flytlap Whisks off the *advocates ; anon the knave Chants out his |oracles, and when he sees The old man plung'd in mysteries to the ears, And scar'd from his few senses, marks his time, And enters on his tricks. False accusations Now come in troops; and at their heels the whip. Meanwhile the rascal siiuffles in nmong us, And begs of one, — browbeats another, — cheats A third, and frightens all. "My honest friends, These cords cut deep, you Ml find it — I say nothing, — .Tudge you between your purses and your backs ; I could, perhaps" — We take the gentle hint, And give him all ; if not, the old man's foot Plays such a tune upon our hinder parts, That flogging is a jest to 't, a mere fleabite — Wherefore, {turning to Niciai) befits it that wo think what course To take, or where to look for help. iVJc. No course So good as that I just advanced you : — flight — Immediate flight. Dcm. Marry, but how avoid The Paphlagonian ? he hath ubiquity As 'twere about him; one leg rests on Pylus, The other takes firm footing in ih' Assembly ; * The advocates, or public orators, performed so important a part in the common- wealth of Alliens, that the reader cannot have some account of them submhled to him too soon. Tliey were ten in number, and were elected by lots, to plead public causes in the Senate and the General Assembly. Indeed, the princi|)al business of those two meet- ings, though it was free to every member to deliver his sentiments in them, was conduct- ed by the public orators. For every cause in which they were retained, they received a (IracJvn f'd. or ^d.) out of the public exchequer. They generallv made trial of their powers first in the courts of justice : when practice had confirmed their talents, they en- tered upon a nobler career, that of enlightening; the senate, and guiding the people. This was a task of peculiar delicacy and the highest importance. No man, therefore, was admitted to the ofiice of a public orator under the age of forty years : nor then till after a strict examination, in which the points most insisted on were — valour in war, piety to parents, prudence in the management of afl^airs, frugality and temperance. There were two or three laws by which any malversation in this most important office was guarded against. Corruption and venality, in spite of these provisions, prevailed among these men ; and their cunning and their eloquence enabled them to evade the punish- ments they amply deserved ; one of them, named Aristophon, could boast that no less than sevcntyfive accusations had been brought against him, and that he had triumphantly repelh (1 all of them. t Oracular responses and predictions, always abounding in Greece, seem to have been circulated in unusual numbers towards the commencement of the Peloponnesian war. Thucydides, lib. ii. c. 8. The oracles in the te.\t are the versified oracles [-^^fiwixu): the prose oracles were called hoyix- 95 THE knights; With either hand the varlet grasps ^tolia! And for his mind — it hath fit habitation In *Clopidae : — how shun a man so various 1 Nic. 'T were better then to give our cares the slip, And end our sorrows and our lives at once : One onlv thought remains, to die as most Befits brave men. Dem. How best may that be done ? Nic. Nought better than a draught of bullock's blood : It was the dose that gave fThemistocles A grave : who dies like him must needs die bravely. Dem. (^contemptuously) A draught of bullock's blood!— a draught of jiure And genuine :j:vvine might serve the turn much better. Nouoht genders thoughts so brilliant as a flask. Nic. A flask ! thy soul is ever in ihy cups ; What thoughts can habit in a toper's brain ? Dem. Harkye, thou trifling, bubbling water-drinker. Who darest speak treason thus against good liquor ! Resolve me — speak — What stirs the §wit most nimbly? What makes the purse feel heaviest, or gives Most life to business ? — wine ! What masters all Disputes'? — a merry cup ! What gives the spirits Their briskest flow ? — good liquor ! What most sets The soul afloat in love and friendly benefits 1 — A mantling bowl ! — hand me a pitcher then : — Quick, quick, nay quick ! I' 11 bathe my very mind And soul therein, and then see who can hit Upon a trim device. Nic. Alack a day ! What will that drunkenness of thine engender! {Goes in doors.) * In this colossal picture, Aristophanes follows his usual metliod of punning upon actual or fabricated names of places. The province JEtolia is selected because derived from a Greek word, which signifies to beg ; and Clopidie, in like manner, because it was at once an Attic borough, and implied the act of stealing. Boccaccio is fond of fabri- catinsj fictitious names of countries in the same manner : see among others the exquisite tales of Frate Cipolla (La sesta Giornata. Nov. 10.) and maestro Simone (lottava Gior, Nov. 9.) t The poet fellows a popular tradition, current in Atliens, in ascribing the death of Themistocles to a draught of bullock's blood. i At the Greek festivals a large cup, called the cup of Good Genius, and full of UJi- mixed wine was carried round the tables, which all the guests were accustomed to taste. For the ori'Mn of the custom, see Athen. lib. xv. p. 675. Demosthenes, an experienced drinker was no friend to that dilution of wine which the custom was intended to com- memorate. 5> The poet it is to be believed, speaks his own sentiments here, as well as those of Demosthenes. Aristophanes is said, like ^scliylus, to liave composed many of his plays under the influence of wine. In Plato's celebrated banquet (which is anything but a feast of san-es) the wine circulates very freely ; and Aristophanes, and, I blush to say it, So- crates, are left drinking together till daylight. The reader will perhaps smile to see Tasso bringing forward the same teacher of wisdom as an excuse for a little intemper- ance. See Black's Life of that unfortunate poet, vol. ii. p. 21. OR THE DEMAGOGUES. 37 Dem. Much good, believe me : quick, and bring the wine then. I '11 lay me down, — let but the generous fumes Once mount into my head, and they will gender Such dainty little schemes — such titbit thoughts — Such trim devices ! — SCENE II. Demosthenes. Nicias returninsr tcith Wine. JVic. ^'ng '^^'6 jubilate ! I have purloined the wine and 'scap'd observance. Bern. How fares the Paphlagonian, lad ? deliver me. Nic. The rogue hath made of confiscation-sales A sorry meal, and fill'd his skin with liquor. Now stretch'd at fnll upon a heap of hides The sorcerer sleeps sound. Bern. Then pour me out A cup of wine — no stint — a bumper, look ye, And let the echo smack her lips in unison. JVic. (pours out tvirie.) Now make libation to the Better Genius — If the name of *Pramnian suit him more — to him Be made the offering IJeiti. To the Better fJenius ! {DrinJi-s, and seems to meditate.') A happy inspiration comes across mo. Thine be the credit of this bright invention ! {Looking at his pitcher toith an affectation of devotion.') Quick, {to Nicias) quick ; and while the Paphlagonian sleeps. Bring forth those foracles he hoards within. * Pramnian wine was not in great repute among the Greeks ; it was neither luscious nor thick, two qualities which the ancients seem to have very mucli regarded in wine. We have tlie testimony of Aristophanes (Ath. lib. i. p. 30.) that harsli poets and rough wine like the Pramnian, were cquallj' repugnant to the taste of the Athenians. Tlie poet, with dramatic propriety', has given it to the slaves in the text. t The Athenian taste for oracles and predictions is best learnt by a pcnisal of Hero- dotus. Those ascribed to the Sybil, AIusxus, and other inspired persons of the fabidous and heroic times, seem to have been in great request. A still more particular credit was ascribed to those whicii bore on them the name of Bacis, a Bceotian, Mho was supposed to have received the gift of pro])hccy from tbe Nymphs, vhose temple stood in the older times on Mount Cithxron. There appear to have been individuals or families at Athens who, possessing large collections of oracles ascribed to this Bacis, thought themselves masters of a great treasure, and thus became the prey of more cunning persons, who pre- tended to decypher these mysteries, which were enveloped in strange and enigmatical characters. That Cleon was not without belief in predictions of this kind seems reason- able to conclude from this and the following scene : and it is the more likely as neither in extraction, education, nor modes of thinking, was he at all elevated above the loM'est of the people- Wieland, Die Demagogen des Aristofanes, s. 13. These prophecies of Bacis are not to be confounded, s,ays M. de Pauw, torn. ii. p. 206. with those contained in the mysterious volume called the Testament, over which such a veil of impenetrable secrecy was thrown that no part of it has transpired to gratify the curiosity of modern times. Dinarchus (the only author among the ancients who mentions this prophetic book) accuses Demosthenes of having failed in respect to this mysterious volume, on which, according to him, the fate of Alliens was suspended. 13 98 THE knights; Nic. Is this the scheme the Better Genius promptsi I fear me much that your divinity Will lose his name, and only cross your ends. {Enters the house.') Dem. Meantime I put this pitcher to my mouth, That I may wet my drought-parch'd mind and hit Upon some neat device. {Drinks.') Nic. {returning,') The rogue sleeps soundly, Or I had not come off so clean : here is The oracle. 'Tis that he prizes most: Hoarding with care, as if 't were somewhat sacred, Dem. Thou art a clever fellow ; reach it here — My eyes must take account of this ; and, friend, Put speed into your hand and fill a cup. I'll see what stuff these oracles are made of. {Reads) Anan ; some liquor, quick ! Nic. 'T is here. How runs The oracle ? Dem. {drinks and reads. ) More liquor. Nic. Call you that The wording on't ? Dem. {reading.) O *Bacis ! Nic. Why, what now ? Dem. {reading.) Wine, wine, more wine. Nic. {pouring out wine.) This Bacis was no flincher. Dem. {reading.) So so ; thou varlet of a Paphlagonian 1 'T was this bred such distrust in thee, and taught To hoard these prophecies. Nic. Say you % Dem. I say Here is a prophecy, which tells the time And manner of this fellow's death. Nic. Out with it. Dem. {reading.) The words are clear enough : first says my oracle — There shall arise within our state a flint-seller. And to his hands the state shall be committed. Nic. One seller note we : — good — proceed — what follows ? Dem. {reading.) Him shall a sheep-seller succeed. Nic. A brace Of sellers ! good — What shall befall this worthy ? * It is after reconling an oracle of Bacis, that Herodotus makes his wellknown decla- ration, that he should never afterwards dare to question the authority of oracles himself, nor submit to such doubts in others. Urania, c. 77. t The whole of the dialogue here is a bitter satire upon the deterioration of the Athe- nian democracy since the death of Pericles ; whose successors in administration had been a lint-seller, Eucrates, a sheep seller, Lysicles, and a leather-seller, Cleon. It is al- most unnecessary to add, that the language of satire is not to be construed too literally ; and that the same extension, perhaps, is to be allowed here as in the language applied by Juvenal to the father of Demosthenes, who instead of being a mere blacksmith, was the proprietor of a large establishment for the manufacture of swords, carried on by a numerous body of those unfortunate slaves, who abounded so much in every Grecian state. OR THE DEMAGOGUES. 99 Dem. {reading.) 'T is fixt that he bear sway till one arise More wicked than himself — that moment seals him : Then comes the Paphlagonian, — the hide-seller, — The man of claws, whose voice outroars *Cycloborus. Nic. The man of sheep then falls beneath the lord Of hides! Dem. Even so: — thus runs the oracle. Nie. Another and another still succeeds, Anj all are sellers ! — sure the race must be Extinct!— Dem. One yet is left, whose craft may stir Your wonder. Nic. What his name ? Dem. Wouldst learn 1 Nic. Aye, marry. Dem. I give it to thee then : — {with emphasis) the man that ruins The Paphlagonian is — a f sausage-seller. Nic. You jest. A sausage-seller! — 'tis a craft Indeed ! and where may such a man be found 1 Dem, The task remains with us to search him out. Nic. Why yonder see, he moves into the forum. {SausagC'Vender is seen at a distance.) The hand of providence is sure in this ! Dem. Hither, thou happiest of sausage-sellers ! I give you hail ! — this way, dearest of men! — Mount up, thou saviour of our town and us. Thy humble servants ! SCENE III. Sausage-vender, Demosthenes, Nicias. Satts. Prithee now, what wouldst thou With me"? Dem, This way, this way: list, friend, and learn. The happy and the blessed man you are. Nic. First rid him of his chopping-block : then pour Into his ears how runs the oracle, And what the blessed fortune that awaits him — I '11 turn an eye upon the Paphlagonian 'W\Xh\n.{Enters the house.) Dem, {to the sausage-vender.) First please to laj' those implements Upon the ground — then do all courtesies And sets of adoration to the gods And mother Earth.:|: • A river of Attica. + The satire here is coarse, but bitter : the whole turn of the comedy, as will easily be seen, is to put Cleon in the most contemptible light possible. % There appears to have been a piece of superstition among the lower orders at Athens, which consisted in kissing the spot of ground on which they stood, when any piece of good luck happened to them. 1 00 THE KNIGHTS ; Saus. Allan ! Lem. Happiest cf men! What wealth awaits thee ! thou to-day art nothing; Yet shall to-morrow see thee top of all, And blessed Athens own thee her prime minister ! Saus. {coldly.) Good man, I fain would wash me these intestines: Why should you put a hindrance in my way, And make a flout at me? Dem. {contemptuously.) Intestines, say you 1 Simplest of men I — your eyes this way awhile — Seest thou yon companies of men ? {Points to the audience.) Saus. I do : What then 1 Dem. Of all these thou shalt be the lord And sovereign — the pnyx, the ports, the forum, — Not one but waits thy ruling nod. The senate Thy feet shall trample on : the generals Shall fall like chips before thee : lord of stocks And sovereign of dungeons, thou shalt lock. And bind — nay, further, {lowering his voice) in the Hall shalt have — A *wellspread bed, — nor want companion in it. Saus. All this for me 1 Dem. Aye, and much more, believe me — But mount thy block, good friend, and cast thy eyes On yonder f isles — dost see them ? Saus. Yes. Dem. Nay, but The marts, the merchantmen — Saus. I mark them all. Dem. O thou art Fortune's very favourite ! The child of happiness ! — your right eye, sir, * A pleasantry by surprise, directed to the coarser appetites of the person in the text. It was usual with the Athenians to grant those citizens, ■whose services, talents, or vir- tues had ennobled their country, an honourable provision for life in the Prytaneum, or hall of public entertainments. The poet appears to be providing a similar daily banquet for his sausage dealer, but by a single word he changes the sense expected and expresses, what I have been obliged to substitute a whole line for, and miss tiie play of words besides. These difficulties occur in almost every ten lines of Aristophanes. + Almost all the islands in the iEgean sea, as well as the numerous Grecian cities of Asia Minor, of the Hellespont and of Thrace, were tributary subjects of the Athenian people : they were not allowed, says Mr Mitford,to possess ships of war, but were de- pendent upon Athens for protection, and liable to every kind and degree of controul from that imperial state. The following extract from Isocrates will show in what manner this haughty people could indulge in all the pride and ostentation of tj'ranny. The pas- sage is thus translated by the historian, whom 1 have just quoted. "So diligent were the Athenians to discover how they might most earn the detestation of mankind, that by a decree they directed the tribute money to be exhibited at the Dionysian festival, on the stage of the theatre, divided into talents ; thus making parade before the allies, numbers of whom would be present, of the property wrested from them to paj' that very mer- cenary force by which they were held in so degrading a subjection ; and setting the other Greeks, of whom also many would be present, upon reckoning what orphans had been made, what calamities brought upon Grecian states, to collect that object of pride for the Athenian people." OR THE DEMAGOGUES. 101 On Caria, — your left upon Clialcedon.* Saus. And call you this the top of happiness — To have my eyes distorted 1 — cry your mercy. Bern. Nay, you mistake — a whisper in your ear — All these are so mucli money in your purse — For thou wilt be — or there 's no faith, be sure, In oracles — a most prodigious man ! Saus. Go to, you canting varlet, am not I A sausage-vender ] — how shall greatness then Sit on a man of my profession 1 Bern. Tut ! It is the very source of greatness : — answer : — Art not a knave 1 — art not o'the forum ?| — hast not A front of brass ? — can Fortune set her seal Of greatness with more certainty upon thee ! Saus. I cannot find in me that worthiness And seal of future power you vaunt so mightily. Dem. Anan ! why sure thou hast some squeamishness Of honesty about thee ! All 's not right, I fear: — answer, art fair'? — art honest ? — art A gentleman ?:|: — how say 'st? Saus. {coldly.) Not I, by Jove ! I am, as all my fathers were — a blackguard. Dem. Then thou art blest : — Fortune hath stamp't and mark'd thee For state-aflairs. Saus. Nay, I want skill in music ;§ * Caria and Chalcedon ■were the northern and southern extremities of real or asserted Athenian dominion on tlie western side of ancient Asia. •f Tlic agora or forum was the resort of all the idle and profligate in Athens. "When Theoplirastus describes a vicious character, the agora is sure to be the scene in which some part of it is laid. % The word used in the text is that which, in the Socratic school, signified the utmost perfection of which our nature is capable. An English translator may take pride ia feeling that his own language can not onlj' supply a word which comes nearest in meaning to the Ka-KCKitybiA ol the ancients, but that Iiis own counUy is that where most examples of it are to be found in existence. Some apology, perhaps, is due for the manner in which the reply to the question in the text is worded ; but the translation is literal, and the moral disgust, which it is meant to convey, forms some justification, it is hoped, in re- taining it. § A knowledge of music formed one of the elementary branches of Athenian education. It was necessary for the younger people of both sexes, that they might be able to bear a part in the choruses and the hymns which accompanied their many religious solemnities ; it was required of men, who held the higher offices of the state, to enable them to give their suffrages with propriety at those contests, which were perpetually submitted to their decision at the theatre and the music rooms. We must not, however, confine the term music to the precise meaning which it bears at present. It had a close relation to gi-ammar, and was made to bear upon all the niceties of that wonderful language. " So simple is its analogy," says Mr Mitford, "of such complex art in its composition and inflexion, of such clearness, force, and elegance in its contexture, and of such singular sweetness, variety, harmony, and majesty in its sound." How nicely susceptible the Attic ear was, and how minntcly the lowest persons entered into the intricacies of its com- position, may be inferred from the wellknown story, related by Cicero, of Theophrastus and the herb-woman. 102 THE knights; And am the sorriest dabster e'en at letters.* Dem. Better you wanted that small skill you boast — 'T is all that makes 'gainst thy sufficiencies : Music and letters ! — tut ! we want no gifts Like these in men who rule us — morals, quotha? — A dolt — a knave, — these are the stuff we make Our statesmen of — but come — throw not away The blessing gracious heav'n has put upon thee By virtue of these oracles. Satis. First let me hear The wording of them. Dem. Nay, you '11 find no want Of wisdom in them, nor variety In the conceit — observe — (Reads.) (Oracle.)]" When the monster, half-tanner, half-eagle, shall take To his mouih, crooked-back'd, the dull blood-sucking snake: Then if rightly prophetic the future I trace, Paphlagonia and :j:pickle shall sink in disgrace. * In the Athenian course of instruction the ypafjifxcLrnnc (or grammarian) immediately preceded thex/9«p/c»c (or music-master). Both preceptors cultivated the imagination, almost exclusively at the expense of the understanding ; and to this vicious system of edu- cation may be traced much of the wild extravagance and fickle enthusiasm which so strongly marked the Athenian character. Instead of those plain treatises on the nature, extent, and situation of the soil on which we live, and those works on morality, which teach us how to live, the first book which the grammarian invariably put into the hands of his pupil, was the works of Homer. The whole of these (see Plato's Banquet) were not unfrequently committed to memory ; and the mischiefs, which resulted from thus reading in infancy, what ought to have been the study of riper years, were so many, (see the Repub. 1. 2. 3.) that Plato, notwithstanding his own evident predilection tor the great father of poetry, concludes with banishing him from his infant state. From the criti- cism, commentaries, explanations, and interpolations of Homer by the grammarians, the pupil was committed to the teacher of music ; till it was gradually discovered that a long ap- plication to music unfits the mind for the acquisition of the sublimer sciences ; that as the sounds and airs are retained, ideas are apt lo slip from the memory, and that the play o the understanding becomes less in proportion as the fingers become more active. De Fauw torn. ii. p. 128. From the works of ^schines, or the person who wrote in his name, it appears therefore that harp music as well as flute music (vide the Acharnians) fell gradually into disuse : but the grammarians (who stood nearly in the same relations of rivalrv and opposition to the philosophers as the comic writers) did not so easily part ■with their predilection for poetry ; and the exclusive system of the two illustrious gram- marians, Aristophanes of Byzantium, and Aristarchus of Alexandria, may almost be traced in the great public schools of England to this day, where the dramatists, the lyric and epic poet, almost entirely supersede the philosopher, and not unfrequently the his- torian and the orator of antiquity. t Oracles were commonly delivered in verse, or at least committed to measure as soon aS they had passed the prophetic lips of the priestess. M. de Pauw, remarking upon those delivered at Delphi, has very justly observed that nowhere did the god of harmony receive such cruel affronts as in his own sanctuary ; where the task of versifying the pre- dictions delivered by the god was committed to persons who sinned not only against poetry, but the commonest rules of metrical composition. ^ Most probably the liquid used in tanning. OR THE DEMAGOGUES. 103 The venders of sausages' star shall arise, And Glory come down with a crown from the skies : — Unfading their fame, as their sacrifice great, Who leave a good trade to take care of the state. Sous, And how points this to me 1 JDem. I will resolve you. The tanner-eagle is the Paphlagonian. Saus, But he is call'd crook-beak'd. — Dent. With reason good. What else his hands but beak and claws and talons ? Saus. But then the serpent — how expound you that ? Dem. Nay, 't is the clearest of similitudes : What is a serpent but a lengthy thing 1 And what your sausage but the samel — again — Your sausage is a bloodsucker; — so is Your snake — and snake, so runs the prophecy. Shall beat the tanner-eagle ; — take he heed, Meantime, that no false speeches cozen him. Saus. The light is broke upon me, and I see A call from heav'n in this ; — I marvel most How I shall do to rule the populace. Dem. Nought easier : model you upon your trade. Deal with the people as with sausages — Twist, implicate, embroil ; — nothing will hurt, So you but make your court to Demus — cheating And soothing him with terms of kitchen science. All other public talents are your own; Your voice is strong, your liver white, and you are O' the forum — say, could Diffidence ask more To claim the reins of state 1 — the Pythian god, The oracles are in your favour; — clap then A chaplet on your head ; drop instant prayer Unto Coalemus,* and bear your manhood Entire against him. Sans. But what aidance may I Expect ? The wealthier fear, the meaner folk Pay the most crouching reverence to him. Drence between true oratory and a mere flow of words; and the satire is conveyed in the affected language of that class of men, whom he exposes with such admirable art in the comedy of the Clouds. The dialogue called Sophista, in which Plato brings all his gigantic powers to bear upon the same pestilent race of men, with an apparent consciousness, that even those powers are almost unequal to the task of fully exposing their falla- cious subtleties and specious deceptions, is conducted almost entirely in the same kind of phraseology. See also his dialogue called Politicus, and Xen. Mem. 1. 3. c. 1. s. 6. That the spirit of the original might not be entirely lost, I have ventured to substitute some of the terms of the diamatic fops of Charles the Second's time. • The satire of Aristophanes is here, as in most other places, perfectly on the right side. The young men of Athens were gradually deserting the manly exercises of the field, for the effeminate pleasures of a town life, and for the public assemblies, in which they valued themselves on displaymg a specious, false and foppish eloquence, in what manners and under what masters acquired, we shall have occa- sion to sec in the comedy of the Clouds. ■\ It was customary for rich men at Athens to have a slave follow them with a stool of this kind, that they might rest themselves at pleasure. The avaricious man in Thco- phrastus saves himself this expense by carrying with him an old mantle for the purpose. \ Some females are here introduced characteristically habited. All early comedy is fond of allusions of this kind. In the French morality, Le bien advise et le mul advis^, the present, past and future tenses of the verb to reign, figure as allegorical persons. § Probably an allusion to tlic thirty years truce, which was to have preceded the Peloponnesian war. 160 THE knights; Salute! — those eyes — how cam'st thou by these beauties 1 Jlgor. They were conceard within, and who but he, The cursed Paphlagonian, to hide theml Take them and hie thee to the country instantly. Dem. And how, meantime, shall fare the Paphlagonian? iMgnr. This be his punishment — to exercise The trade I leave — dwell by the city gales. Owning no fellowship nor soft communion — To ply — (and that by grace) — the trade of Sausage-vender — To make his olios — *dogflesh enrich'd With asses meat — to know no sober moment — And when he 's high in wine, to make a war Of words upon his graceless nymph companions— To thirst and slake his parching throat from streams Which first have visited the public baths — Does this content, or shall worst treatment bide him % Dem. Nay, I subscribe to this — on such society His swordtongue best is drawn — there let him battle — (Jo 'igor.') For thee — thy services deserve the Hall, And seat which late install'd that worthless varlet. Take you this robe, ('t is green, and borrows name From frogs) you are my debtor for it — follow me And bear the same in hand — for Cleon, let now His new pursuit see him in solemn act Install'd, and garb'd as best befits his office: 'T will satisfy the strangers whom his coarse Affronts have long been wont to mortify. f [A processmi — Cleon is carried in state in the full costume and with all the imple- ments of his new profession — the Chorus accompanying the pomp with a song, which unfortunately has not come dotun to «s.] • It was the custom, acrording to the Scholiast, for the lower tradesmen to prac- tise tricks of this kind and thus impose upon the unwary. It appears, however, from Hippocrates, unpalatable and even monstrous as such a dish may appear to us, that the flesh of asses, horses, dogs and foxes was eaten without any scruple in Greece. Dogs' flesh, according to Casaubon, was recommended by this great physician as particularly wholesome. f Thus ends this singular play : a short remark from one of the most clear- sighted and virtuous of the poet's contemporaries will supersede the necessity of making any comments upon its tendency, or pointing out the lessons of political wisdom, which may be derived from it. — " That the populace should be partial to a democracy," says the excellent Xenophon. " I can easily excuse ; for it is pardonable that every person should try to benefit himself; but if any one, not immediately in the rank of the people, prefers living in a democratical rather than in an oligarchical government, that man is a villain by anticipation, and acts upon the consciousness, that it is easier to be a bad man and to escape detection in a state where the govern- ment is in the hands of the many, than it is in a state where the government is in the hands of a few." Xen. de Rep. Ath. c. ii. § 20. THE END. J t •f5