Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/twointroductoryl01hunt TWO INTRODUCTORY LECTURES^ DELIVERED BY Dr. WILLI A M H U N T E R, 1 TO HIS LAST COURSE OF ANATOMICAL LECTURES, AT HIS THEATRE IN WINDMILL-STREET: As they were left correded for the Press by himfelf,. TO WHICH ARE ADDED, Some PAPERS relating to Dr. HUNTER’s intended PLAN, for eftablifhing a M’U S E U M in LONDON,. FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF ANATOMY,. S U P G E R Y, and P H Y S I C. ■ '>• Printed by Order of t-H . E S, FOR J. pO H N S O N,, No. 72, St. 'CK-Yard, London. M.DCC.LXEX-IV.- LECTURE I. N A T O M Y is the art of examining animal bodies by diffedtion. It teaches the Ilrufture and fundlions of thofe bodies, and fhews nearly on what life and health depend. When thefe are well underftood, a great ftep is made towards the knowledge and cure of difeafes. The word Anatomy is originally Greek, llgnifying dilTedion or cutting : but we are not to imagine from the etymology, that Anatomy means no more than the bare management of the knife, feiflars, or other cutting inftruments, upon dead bodies. The ancients, indeed, meant little more by it ; this being al- moft their only method of inveftigation : but in our days, it taken in a much more comprehenfive fenfe. Thus injeding, macerating, corroding, boiling, diftilling, in a word, every operation by which we endeavour to difeover the ftrudure and ufe of any part of the body, is anatomical. As every animal body is the fubjed of Anatomy, we divide it into the human and compart-:! / .. The firft of thefe is confined to the human body, the xtended to the whole animal creation. The humar^Ana what we propofe to explain: the comparative will only, ..troduced occafionally, where it r 4 ] it ferves to illuflrate the other, or to guide us in reafoning from analogy. The ftrudture of fome parts may be fo delicate, or involved, in the human fpccies, as to be undifcoverable ,* yet in another fpecles, the hrufture of thofe very parts may be apparent. Accordingly, many things have been firft difcovered in comparative Anatomy, and were afterwards found out in the human body. Even monfters, and all uncommon, and all difeafed animal productions, are ufefuHn anatomical enquiries 5 as the mechanifm, or texture, which is concealed in the ordinary fafhion of parts, may be obvious in a preternatural compofition- And it may be faid, that nature, in thus varying and multiply- ing her productions, has hung out a train of lights that guide us through her labyrinth. Anatomy, like molt arts, has undergone many revolutions^^ having been in high credit in fome ages and countries, and keenly purfued ; and on the contrary, in others, it has been as much neglected or depreffed. It would be prepofterous to give a long detail of its hlftory, in the beginning of a courfe of lec- tures, becaufe a beginner in this fludy, will hardly be able to remember by whom, and under what circumftances this, or that difcoverj, or improvement, was made, when from his ignorance of the fubjeCt, he cannot be fuppofed to know,, what fuch difcoveries really were. Wherefore, w’e fhall referve molt of the hlftory, to be thrown in with the Anatomy, by faying fomething of the principal improvers, and WTiters on the feveral parts, as we go on. At prefent we fhall be fatisfied with a general fketch of its ori;;ia '■■n 1 progrefs. The want of records, lea i.i the dark, with regard to the origin of this art ; yet, . reafonabie to conclude, that like moil other arts, it had no precife beginning. The nature _ ii-L5 ^ of the thing would not admit of its lying for a time altogether concealed, and of being fuddenly brought to light, either by chance, or genius, or induflry. All the ftudies and arts which are in human life, are fo interefling and obvious, that man in every fituation, - has always by inftindt and common fenfe turned his thoughts to them, and made fome progrefs in the cultivation of them. To talk ferioufly of the invention of agriculture, building, or architecture, aftronomy, navigation, mechanics, phyfic, fur- gery, or anatomy, by fome particular man, or in one particular country, or at a time fubfequent to fome prior aera, would be to difcover great ignorance of human nature. We might juft as well fuppofe that, till a certain period of time, man was without inftinClive appetites, and without obfervation and re- flection j and that, in a happy hour, he found out the art of fupporting life by taking food. All fuch arts, in a lefs or more cultivated ftate, were from the beginning, and ever muft be found in all parts of the inhabited world. The firft men who lived, muft have foon acquired fome notions of the ftruCture of their own bodies, particularly of the external parts, and of fome even of the internal, fuch as bones, joints,'' and finews, which are expofed to the examination of the fenfe* in living bodies. This rude knowledge muft have been gradually improved, by the accidents to which the body i*s expofed, by the ne- ceflities of life, and by the various cuftoms, ceremonies and Cuperftitions of different nations. Thus, the obfervance of bodies killed by violence, attention to wounded men, and to many difeafes, the various ways of putting criminals to death, _ B 2 the [ 6 ] the funeral ceremonies, and a variety of fuch things, muft have fhewn men, every day, more and more of themfelves ; efpecially as curiofity and felf-love would urge them powerfully to obfervation and refledlion. The brute-creation having fuch an affinity to man in out- ward form, motions, fenfes, and ways of life ; the generation of the fpecies, and the effe(ft of death upon the body, being obferved to be fo nearly the fame in both, the conclulion was not only obvious, but unavoidable, that their bodies were formed nearly upon the fame model. And the opportunities of examining the bodies of brutes, were fo eafily procured, indeed fo necelfarily occurred in the common bulinefs of life, that the huntfman in making ufe of his prey, the prieft in facrificing, the augur in divination, and above all, the butcher, or thofe who might out of curiofity attend upon his operations, mufi: have been daily adding to the little flock of anatomical know- ledge. Accordingly we find, in fait, that the South-fea-iflanders, who have been left to their own obfervation and reafoning, without the affiftance of letters, have yet a confiderable fhare of rude, or wild anatomical and phyfiological knowledge. When Omai was in this Mufeum, with Mr. Banks, though he could not explain himfelf intelligibly, we plainly faw that he knew the principal parts of the body, and fomething likewife of their ufes ; and manifefted a great curiofity, or defire of having the fundlions of the internal parts of the body explained to him 5 particularly the relative fundions of the two fexes, which, with him, feemed to be the mod: objed of the human mind. We may further imagine thit the philofophers of the mod early ages, that is, the men of curiofity, obfervation, experience, andi [ 7 3 and refle° ] o this earth : the moon and other planets, would be dldingulilied from the fixed flars, by the changes in their fituation with refpedt to one another. All the fleeplefs hours of all the inhabitants* would be, of courfe, beflowed on the fpangled firmament : fo tliat afironomy mull have been gradually improved, from the firfi: time of thole countries being inhabited. It is jufi: as natural to fuppofe, that the variety of thefc heavenly lights, would tempt men to diftinguifh them into clafies, and try to afcertain their number, as well as to give dilHnguifhing names both to the clafies and to the inditiduals. Arithmetic would, of courfe, likewife become a nodlurnal em- ployment with mofi; of the inhabitants; and they would be driving who could count the greatefi; numbe*r of liars. Mr. Wood obferved further, that thefe peculiarities of eaftern Ikies, convinced him of the true reafon why the people of the Eafi:, have been fo conftantly prone to worlhip the hofts of heaven. He faid he found himfelf, in the night, fo fiiruck with the beauty of the firmament, that he could hardly fupprefs a notion that thefe bright objeds were animated beings of fome very high order, and were Ihedding fome important influence on this earth, and upon every living creature in it. From this effed upon himfelf, he was fure that at all times in thofe countries, the minds of men mufl: have had a tendency to that fpecies of fuperftition ; efpecially when ficknefs and difeafe, through long fleeplefs nights, would work upon their mind with the fear of being incurable by human art, of their fuf- ferings being fent upon them by fome offended divinity as a punifliment ; all which would naturally dired: their fuper- Jflitious expiations and prayers to thofe heavenly lights. In t I! ] In eafterii countries too, but particularly in y^^gypt, where 'the falling of rain, and fubfequent fwelling of rivers, happens only at one particular feafon, mens attention would be called to lludy and watch the feafons, to meafure the depth of v/ater, the extention of the inundation, the quantity of ground that would be fertilized, &c. &c.Thefe peculiarities of their lituation, would lead the inhabitants, in the earlieft ages, to the fludy and pradice of geometry. But in thofe eaflern countries, animal bodies run fo quickly into naufeous putrefadlion, that the early inhabitants mud: have avoided fuch offenfive employments as anatomical enquiries, like their pbfterity at this day. And in fadl, it does not appear, by the writings of the Grecians, or Jews, or Phoenicians, or of other eaflern countries, that Anatomy was particularly chltivated, by any of thofe eaflern nations. In tracing it backwards to its infancy, we cannot go farther into antiquity, than the times of the Grecian philofophers. As an art in the flate of fome cul- tivation, it may be faid to have been brought forth and bred up among them, as a branch of natural knowledge. The aera of philofophy, as It was called,' began with Thales the Milefian being declared by a very general confent of the people, the mofl wife of all the Grecians, 480 years before Chrift. ' 7 "he philofophers of his fchool, which was called the Ionian, cultivated principally natural knowledge. Socrates, the feventh in fucceflion of their great teachers, introduced the fludy of morals ^ and was thence faid to bring down philofophy from heaven, to make men truely wife and happy*. C His * Of his fchola.rs, Ariflippus founded the Cyrenalc fefl, Euclid the Megaric Phjedo the Eliac, Antifthenes the Cyaic, and Plato the Academic. [ 12 - ] His fcholar and fiicceffor, Plato, fpent his whole life, firft in acquiring wifdom and knowledge himfelf, and then in teaching it to others. He carried the reputation of the Lycseum, the public fchool at Athens, to the higheft pitch of credit. No- thing, perhaps, contributed more to incite, to polidi, and to raife the minds of the Grecians, to that diflinguiflied rank of excellence which all fucceeding ages have allowed them to have pofTefled, than their public fchools, and particularly thofe at Athens ^ where perfuafive eloquence was much lludied and ho- nored, and made ufe of upon the mod intereding occafions, for the recommendation and embellilhment of all the nobler virtues.. Young men had eafy accefs to the converfations and harangues of the mod eloquent, the mod learned, and the mod refpecdable men among the Athenians. It is as eafy to conceive, what a. wonderful effedl that mud have had upon young and generous minds, as the faft is unquedionable, that the Grecians excelled all mankind in elegant fimplicity and in grandeur of thought y and of courfe, in all the fine arts. In the writings of Plato we fee, that the phllofophers had carefully confidered the human body, both in its organization and functions and though they had not arrived at the know- ledge of the more minute and intricate parts, which required the fuccedive labour and attention of many ages, they had made up very noble and comprehenfive ideas of the fubjedlin general. The anatomical defcriptions of Xenophon and Plato have had the honor of being quoted by Longinus, (§.xxxii.) as fpecimens of fubllme writing ; and the extradl from Plato is filll more re- markable for. its containing the rudiments of th@ circulation of the blood. “ The heart, fays Plato, is the centre or knot of the blood-vefiels j the fpring or fountain of the blood, which^ is carried impetuoufly round j the blood is the pabulum or food: [ 13 ] food of the fleili ; and for the purpofe of nourithment, the body is laid out into canals, like thofe which are drawa “ through gardens, that the blood may be conveyed, as from ** a fountain, to every part of the pervious body." Hippocrates was nearly contemporary with the great phiiofo- phers of whom we have been fpeaking, about 400 years be- fore the Chridian sera. He is faid to have feparated the pro- feffion of philofophy and pnyfic, and to have been the nrfr who applied to phyfic alone, as the bufinefs of his life. He is likev>dfe generally fuppofed to be the hrft who wrote upon ana- tomy. We know of nothing that was written exprefsly upon the fubjeift before ; and the firH; anatomical dilTedtion which has been recorded, was made by his friend Democritus, of Ab- dera. After the redoration of Greek learning in the fifteenth century, it was fo fafhionable, for two hundred years together,-J:o extol the knowledge of the ancients in Anatomy, as in other things, that Anatomifts feem to have made it a point of emulation, who fhould be mod lavidi in their pralfe; fome from a diffidence in themfelves ; others through the love of detracting from the merit of contemporaries; many from having laborioufly dudied ancient learning, and having become enthufiads in Greek litera- ture j but more, perhaps, becaufe it was the fafhionable turn of the times, and was held up as the mark of good education and fine tade. If we read the works of Hippocrates with impartiality, and apply his accounts of the parts, to what we know of the human body, we mud allow his defcriptions to be imperfeCt, incorred, fometimes extravagant, and often unintelligible, that C 2 of [ H 3 of the bones only excepted. He feems to have ftudled tliefe with more fuccefs than the other parts, and tells us that he had an opportunity of feeing an human flieleton. Here we may obferve, that the working up of any complex fcience or art, fo- as to reduce it to a tolerable fyllem is a more arduous tafk, and requires much more time, and the colledted obfervations of a much greater number of men, event through a fucceflion of ages, than could well -be imagined by any perfon,. who knows it only in an improved ftate. We might fay of improved fcience and art, what has been frequently faid of particular difcoveries, when known y it appears to be fo eafy or obvious, that one wonders it had not been made one or two thoufand years fooner. From Hippocrates to Galen, who flourilhed towards the end of the fecond century, in the decline of the Roman empire, that is, in the fpace of 600 years. Anatomy was greatly improved the philofophers ftill confidering it as a mod; curious and inte- refting branch of natural knowledge, and the phyhcians as a principal foundation of their art. Both of them, in that in- terval of time, contributed daily to the common Idock, by more accurate and extended obfervations, and by the lights of im- proving philofophy. To trace our art, with learning in general, from the times of Hippocrates to that of Galen, we fhall give a iketch of the fludies at the two famous fchools «among the Greeks, viz. at Athens, and at Alexandria ; and of the introduction of Greek literature among the Romans. At [ 15 ] At Athens, Ariftotle, the favourite pupil of Plato, gave him- felf up to philofophy and phyfic ; and was appointed a public teacher at the Lycsum, at the memorable period when Grecian liberty was giving way to the power of Macedon. He was pa- tronized by Philip, and made tutor to Alexander. He was a man of great natural acutenefs, improved by very extenfive and deep fludy ; of a courtly turn for elegance and expence, and adapted as much as polilble, all his philofophy to his pupil, and to the court. He was the firft we know of, who collected a great library, which, with all his own compofitions, he left to his favourite pupil, Theophradus 5 who, at his dcfire, fuc- ceeded him as public teacher of philofophy' in the Lycsum, with the fame turn for elegance, and with the highefc charac- ter for natural acutenefs, and unremitting perfeverance in fludy. Thefe two great men lived in the mod perfect frienddaip 5 were very fimilar in their charadler, in their dudies and purfuits : and as they had applied very particularly to the dudy of animal bodies, they not only made great improvements, efpecially in phydology, but raifed the credit of natural know- ledge, and fpread it as v/ide as Alexander’s empire. Few of Aridotle’s writings were made public in his life-time. He adedled to fay that they would be unintelligible to thofe> who had not heard them explained at his lectures : and, except the ufe which Theophradus made of them, they were lod to the public for above 130 years after the death of Theophradus ; and at lad came out defedtive from bad prefervation, and cor- rupted by men, who, without proper qualifications, pre- fumed to corredl, and to fupply what was lod. For, Theo- phradus left thefe, and his whole library, to one Neleus, of Scepfis, [ >6 ] Scepfis, who left them to his relations. Thefe hid them In a cave, left their kings of Pergamus ftiould felze them for their ovv^n library, which they were extending with emulous oppo- fttion to that which the Ptolemies were collecting with fo much ambition at Alexandria. The books were at laft taken out, but mucli damaged, by the proprietors the heirs of Theophraftus, and fold for a great fum of money to Apellico of Teium, who was buying up libraries at that time. This library foon afterwards was feized upon by S^ylla, and fent to Rome. From the time of Theophraftus, the ftudy of natural know- ledge, at Athens, was for ever on the decline ; and the repu- tation of the Lycteum and Academy was almoft confined to the ftudies which are fubfervient to oratory and public fpeaking. We may eaftly conceive, that ftudy in general muft hav’-e been much Interrupted at Athens, by the great ftruggle which was maintained for liberty, before that city fell under the calm and fettled government of the Romans. In the times of Philip the father of Perfeus, the Athenians having made an alliance with the Romans, that king attempted to furprize Athens. He failed ; and being exafperated, reduced to rubbifti and ruin, the Lycaeum, the facred groves, many temples, tombs, &c. and laid all the environs wafte j upon which the Athenians in revenge, palled the memorable decree for deftroying all the ftatues and inferiptions, which had been fet up in honor of the Macedonian family. At the breaking out of the Mithridatic war, about 87 years before Chrift, Athens, by the contrivance of Arifteon, deferted the Romans, her friends, and allies, and with moft of the Greek cities, joined Mithridates. Syllawas feat into Greece : moft of the other cities f '7 ] cities fubinitted, but Athens flood an obllinate fiege. Archelaus defended the Pirsus, and Arifleon Athens. Sylla’s army was fup- ported by the facred treafures, taken by Lucullus from the tem- ples of Delphi and Epidaurus. What remained of the trees in the facred groves, was cut down to fupply warlike ma- chines for carrying on the fiege. The town was at length taken, pillaged, almoft deflroyed, and great numbers of the 'inhabitants put to the fword.. After Athens had begun to flourifh again, under the pro- tedtion of the Romans, very unfortunately it took part againfl. Casfar, firfl; with Pompey, then with Brutus and Caffius, and lafl of all with Marc. Anthony j for all which it felt the re- fentment of Auguflus, and languifhed, till Hadrian reflored it to its ancient government, and protedled the fchools ; foon,; after whom, both Antoninus Pius, and Marcus Antoninus, with- great partiality, encouraged fludies there, and gave falaries^ to their profelTors. So much 'for that famous feat of learning and elegance.- The other great inflitution for Grecian education, was ar Alexandria in ^gypt. That city, laid out, and begun to* be built by Alexander himfelf, became, foon after his death, the metropolis of a great and rich Greek empire. The firfl Ptolemies, both from their love of literature, and to give true and permanent dignity to their empire, and to Alexander’s favourite chy, fet up a grand;” fchool in the palace itfelf,. with a mufeum, and a library, which we may fay, has been the moil famed in the world. It has been fuppofed to have been founded by the firfc Ptolemy, when he had alTociated- his fbn Philadelphus in the throne of yEgypt, and to have- been put under the diredlion of Demetrius Phalereus. The- hrilt [ i8 ] fi'ift race of the Ptolemies, from their virtues, and love of learning, were daily adding to the number of books in the library, inviting and protedting men of eminence, in every branch of literature, fcience, or art, and adding to the fplen- dor of the fchools. This noble foundation grew to be fo » much the pride and boaft of the empire, that Ptolemy Phyf- con himfelf, one of the moft brutal and profligate of the race, was fludious of patronizing learned men^ and fo earneft in colledting books, that, in jealoufy of Eumenes, who was colledling a fplendid library of the fame kind at Pergamus, and the more certainly to preferve the fuperiority of the Alexandrian library, he prohibited the exportation of iTgyptia/i paper, Befides this great library in the palace, there was a fecond colledted in the Serapion, or temple of Serapis. The'firft was burnt when the Alexandrians attacked and befieged Ju- lius Caefar in the palace. The fecond, which was preferved, was in a fhort time enriched by the addition of the rival li- brary from Pergamus^ confiding of 200,000 volumes, which Anthony brought away, and prefented to Cleopatra. This lad great collection of books differed greatly in the year 390, when the temple of Serapis was dedroyed by the Chridian zealot, the Patriarch Theophilus, at the fail of paganifm, and dually and compleatly burnt by the Saracens, when they took that city in the year 640. After the fchools were opened at Alexandria, and protected upon fo noble a plan, men of learning docked , thither, both becaufe they would be encouraged and protected j whereas, in Greece and in Ada, they were expofed to the endlefs ^ horrors, oppredions, and ravages, occafioned by the con- tentions and wars, which were carried on among the dic- cedbrs ’[ 19 3 c^fTors oT Alexander. In all thofe other extenfive countries, the finer arts of peace were every day more interrupted or neg- lected ; and at Alexandria, on the contrary, were daily rifing to higher credit. In a fliort time this fchool became as much the moft eminent for fcience, for every branch of natural know- ledge, and for phyfic, as Aithens was for oratory. The two diftinguiflied Anatomiils at Alexandria, v/ere Erafiflratus, the pupil and friend of Theophraftus, and He^ rophilus. Their voluminous works are all loft j but they are quoted by Galen, almofl in every page. Thefe profeffors were probably the firft who were authorized to diif at human bodies ; a peculiarity which marks ftrongly the philofophical magnanimity of the firft Ptolemy, and fixes a great sera in the hiftory of Anatomy. And it was, no doubt, from this particular advantage which the Alexandrians had above all others, that their fchool not only gained, but for many cen- turies preferved, the jirjl reputation for medical education. Ammianus Marcellinus, who lived about 650 years after the fchools were fet up, fays, they were fo famous in his time, that it was enough to fecure credit to any phyfician, if he could fay that he had ftudied at Alexandria. Herophilus has been faid to have anatomized 700 bodies. We muft allow for exaggeration. Nay, it was faid, that both he and Erasiftratus made it a common pradice to open living bodies, that they might difcover the more fecret fprings of life. But this, no doubt, was only a vulgar opi- nion, rifing from the prejudices of mankind ; and, accord- ingly, without any good reafon, fuch tales have been told of modern anatomifts, and have been believed by the vul- gar. D [ 20 J In the period of the hiftory of our art, of learning and arts in general, which we are now conhdering, viz. from Ariftotle to Galen, we muft fee how the arts of Greece were conveyed to the Romans : for, in the firh; part of that pe- riod the Romans were barbarians, but in the laft they were poliflied and learned, and v/ere become the fovereigns both of Athens and Alexandria,- Long after the Romans were become a great and formi- dable ftate, they continued to be a rough unpoliihed people: military glory was the great objecft of their ambition, and the love of their country their principal virtue. Tlie foft arts of peace, refinement and elegance, they defpifed, as tending to enervate the mind, and to fupprefs that martial enthufiafm which they cultivated with fo much ardor. And their pride, or contracted felf-love, which we fee operating in the fame manner.^ among modern nations, made them af- fedl to defpife in others, what they themfelves had not been happy enough to attain. But when their empire grew to be extenfively refpedled and dreaded, the Romans became connedted in alliances, dif- putes, and wars, with the Grecian Rates, their neighbours . particularly about the times of Pyrrhus, juft before the JirJi Punic war, when they had driven him out of Italy, and taken Tarentum, and fome other Greek cities, in that part of Italy called Magna Graecia, about 274 years before Chrift. This intercourfe gradually infpired the Romans with fome tafte for the Grecian arts, and a defire of ftudying the lan- guage of that highly cultivated people. In a little time more, the Romans had got pofteffion of Meftana in Sicily, and took Agrigentum by fiege ; and about 236 years before Chrift, [ -21 ] ' ' Chfift, at the end of the firfl Punic war, they had polTef- fed themfelves of all Sicily, except Syracufe, which vvas under the dominion of Hiero. ' Two hundred and tw'enty-iix before Chrifi:, Roman ern^ baffadors were fent to Athens and Corinth, upon the break- ing out of the focial war between the iEtclians, fupported by Philip, and the Ach^ans, protected by the Romans. 207 years before Chrift, they took Syracufe ; upon which all Sicily having fabmitted became a Roman province. — 189 years before Chrift, a Roman army was fent into Alia, againft Antiochus the Great, whofe rich fpoils being brought to Rome, introduced a tafte for Afiatic luxury. — 165 years before Chrift, they had reduced Macedon to a Roman pro- vince, and from that country raifed a refpedtable library at Rome 5 and their commiffioners fent 1000 of the principal men of Achgea to be tried at Rome, where they were con- demned, and difperfed over Italy, to different places of im- prifonment. About this time the Romans had a conftant and encreafing intercourfe with the Grecians, by reciprocal complaints, ac- cufations, pleadings, &c. in one of which Carneades, the Athenian philofopher and orator, infpired the younger men, efpecially of the Roman fenate, with the higheft veneration for eloquence. The Romans every day treated the Grecians with more imperioufnefs, till 146 years before Chrift, all Greece was made a Roman province, in confequence of Mum- mius defeating the Achgeans ; when Corinth, the feat of the fineft arts, was plundered and burnt to the ground, and the much valued pidlures and works in fculpture which it con- tained, were conveyed to Rome. D 2 All t 22 ] Ali this neceflarlly-occafioned a conflant intercourfe, a. mixture with the people, more intimate acquaintance with their language and manners, and a relidt for their ftudiesj, their elegant arts, and works of eyery kind. The mold -difllngniflicd men in the Roman republic foon courted the company and the inhrudlions of the Grecian philofophers j even entertained them conftantly in their houfes, for the fake of learning their language and their philofophy. Scipio Africanus, Laslius, and Furius did fo, though Cato the cenfor, drove the Grecian rhetoricians from Rome, be- fore their bulinefs.was brought to a conclufion, for fear of their corrupting, as he called it, the Roman youth, giving them a turn for fpeaking rather than for acting, and diverting them from the Rudy of the laws and cuRoms of their fore- fathers. Such was hh averlion, and that of many leading men at Rome, to Grecian mannero, that a rigid edid: was twice paffed, to prohibit Latin rhetoricians from teaching their art. Lucullus, the conqueror of Macedon, was particularly de- voted to Grecian learning, and had always fome of the moR eminent orators and philofophers about him. He brought home with him to Rome, both the books and the moR enlightened men of Greece j and, vrhich was the moR truely honorable part of his triumph, he made his own houfe their afylum. Cicero likewife, by his attention to the learned Greeks, and to their philofophy, contributed very much to give them credit at Rome, It [ . =3 ] It was the weight and influence of thofe great characters, which accomplifhed the transfufion of learning, philolophy and arts, from the Grecians to the Romans, and gave rife to the learning, the tafle and elegance of, the Auguflan age. But unfortunately the Romans did not adopt the Grecian manner of educating their young men in public fchools at home. They either fent them to fludy in Greece or had private tutors in their families from,, that country. From v/hich it is evident that among the Romans, good education mufl have been confined to a few, in proportion to the Whole : and it may be prefumed, that this was one reafon why they fell fo far fliort of the Grecians as a learned and refined people. The rich alone could get the bed: education ; and no fortune could command the acquifition of more than what continued to be taught at Athens and Alexandria, in ' the time of the Roman emperors. But Grecian ftudies, and all the ingenious and fine arts, were conflantly on the de- dine from the time that Grecian liberty was loft. In comparing the Romans with the Grecians, if we allow them to have had fome poets, orators, philofophers, and hiftorians, deferving to be brought into competition with thofe of the Greeks, to the eternal difgrace of their empire, it muft be allowed, that their hiftory is hardly embellifhed with the name of a fingle Roman, who was great in fcience or art, in painting, or fculpture, in phyfic, or in branch^ of natural knowledge. And therefore we cannot introduce o?2e Roman into the hiftory of Anatomy ; for, Pliny and Celfus were mere compilers from the Greeks. * Thefe " t 24 ] Thefe hlftorical obfervatlons prepare us for an account of Galen. He received a liberal education at Pergamus, the place of bis birth; and began at 17 years of age to join the ftudy of phyfic to that of philofophy. In his 21ft year, A. D. 151, he went to Smyrna, where he likewife ftudied both ; then to Corinth, to ftudy under Numefianus, a great Anatomift of thofe times, and to many other parts of Greece and Afia; and then to Alexandria, when the fchool was at the higheft credit which it had ever attained under Roman emperors. Claudius “had founded and given his name to a new mufeum there, and appointed fome new le but, they have paflfed as things obvious to common fenfe, and have been, time immemorial, as univerfally diffufed among mankind. Such [ 45 ] Such is the ^mrklng of the ore into malleable iron j an art which muft have been difcovered by fome happy accident in fome one part of our hemifphere, and by degrees commu- nicated to the whole 5 hence, at all known times, pradifed in part of Alia, Africa, and Europe. Yet it is an art of fuch difficult inveftigation, that in America it was never found out from the beginning of the world. It was communicated to the inhabi- tants of that hemifphere, by the Europeans, in very late times, and to this hour is unknown to the South-Sea Illanders. The fame may be faid of the invention of letters, or writing j with this great difference however, that writing, in its gradation from fomething natural and hieroglyphic, to arbitrary marks or letters, would naturally occur to ingenious and thinking men. Some of the moH fplendid and ufeful of more modern in„ ventions and difcoveries, are hardly to be traced to their firff authors ; fuch as, magnifying-glaffes, gunpowder, and the com- pafs j which is not to be accounted for fo well as by fuppofings that there had been fuch participation, fuch mutual affiftance given and received, that no one man could boaff of having a fair claim to the whole. And of thefe it is to be ob- ferved likewife, that after their firfl happy introduddion, great improvements, and a variety of ufeful applications have been daily invented. The bleffed art of printing, from which mankind have re- ceived fo much benefit, efpecially by rendering ail kinds of learning an eafy acquifition, was made out by fuch gradual fieps, that it is difficult to fay who was the inventor. Stamps G 2 for [ 46 3 for cards, for little image?, and pidures, efpeclal ly of the religious kind, with the names of faints, and little excerpts from Scripture, and then little books, cut in blocks of wood, were printed by different people, in Italy, Germany, and Holland, long before Fuff invented movable types, caft in metal. Of this Lift invention, it is very remarkable, that in the fpace of a very few years, it was brought almoft to the higheft date of per- fection which it has yet attained. The authors of the three great difeoveries in later times, and all the circumflances, are well knowm ; I mean, the dif- covery of the weftern hemifphere by Columbus j of the true folar fyftem by Copernicus ; and of the circulation by Harvey. All thefe three men have equally acquired immortality ; but they have not had, nor deferved, .an equal degree of honour and credit. Honour is acquired only by merit } immortality, by any thing very ftriking or interefting to mankind, w’hether meritorious, or flagitious, or accidental and neutral. The mad ruffian who affaflinated Henry, acquired immortality as well as Henry : but he had no merit, and has had no honour annexed to his immortality, / Of thefe three dlfcoverers, Columbus ffands foremofl; in merit j indeed he is beyond comparifon. His objeCt was the greateff, among w'orldly things, that ever employed the human mind. It was a new fubjeCt, and entirely his own. His fagacious and comprehenfive mind grafped an unfeen world, with**fueh hrmnefs, that nothing could prevail upon him to let go his- bold : and in executing his plan for finding and taking pofTeffion of it, he exercifed the noblefl; virtues of human nature ^ courage, perfevering refolution, patient hope, humanity to [ 47 ] to his fellovz-creatures, ‘ and a dependence on the will of heaven, to a degree perhaps beyond any example in the hhlory of mankind. Next to Columbus, with regard to merit, we muft place Copernicus. His fubjedl was fplendid and great, almofl be- yonc^ the limits of human comprehenlion. But, it was not entirely his own, or new. Some advances had been made by other aftronomers, to invite and diredt him to the great truth which he made out ; which, however, could not be made out, but by the application of very acute intelledual powers. In merit, Harvey’s rank muft be comparatively low indeed. So much had been difcovered by others, that little more was left for him to do, than to drefs it up into a fyftem ; and that, every judge in fuch matters will allow, required no ex- traordinary talents. Yet, eafy as it was, it made him immortaU But none of his writings fhew him to have been a man of uncommon abilities. It were eafy to quote many paffages, which bring him nearly to a level with the reft of mankind. He lived almoft thirty years after Afellius publHhed the Lac- teals, yet, to the laft, feemed moft inclined to think, that no fuch veflels exifted. Thirty hours at any time, fhould have been fufticient to remove all his doubts. But this fub- jed, taken up in felf-defence, grows unpleafant. Harvey’s dodrine, at firft, met with conliderable oppofttion. But in the fpace of about twenty years, it was fo generally and fo warmly embraced, that it was imagined every thing in phyfic would be explained. But time and experience have taught us, that we ftill are, and probably muft long continue to [ 48 ] (0 be, very ignorant, and that in the ftudy of the human body, and of its difeafes, there will always be an extenfive field for the exercife of fagacity. After the difcovery and knowledge of the circulation of the blood, the next queflion would naturally have been, about the paffage and route of the nutritious part of the food, or chyle, from the bowels to the blood- veffels. And, by good fortune, in a few years after Harvey had made his difcovery, Afellius, an Italian phyfician, found out the ladeals, or vef- fels, which carry the chyle from the inteftines ; and printed his account of them, with coloured prints, in the year 1627, the very year before Harvey’s book came out. For a number of years after thefe two publications, the Ana- tomifts in all parts of Europe, were daily opening living dogs, either to fee the ladeals, or to obferve the phasnomena of the circulation. In making an experiment of this kind, Pecquet in France, was fortunate enough to difeover the tho- racic dudt, or common trunk of all the ladleals, which con- veys the chyle into the fubclavian vein. He printed his dif- covery in the year 1651. And now the ladteals having been traced from the inteflines to the thoracic dudt, and that dudt having been traced to its termination in a blood-velTel, the paf- fage of the chyle was completely made out. The fame pradlice of opening living animals, furnlfhed oc- cafions of difeovering the lymphatic veifels. This good fortune fell to the lot of Rudbec firll, a young Swedish Anatomift, and then to Thomas Bartholine, a Danilh Anatomift, who was the firft who appeared in print upon the lymphatics. His book came out in the year 1653, that is, two years after that [ 49 ] that of Pecquet. And then it was very evident that they had been feen before, by Dr. Higmore, and others, who had rniftaken them for ladleals. - But none of the Anatomifts of thofe times, could make out the origin of the lymphatics, and none of the Phyliologifls could give a fatisfadlory account of their ufe. The circulation of the blood, and the paiTage of the chyle, having been fatisfadtorily traced out in full grown animals, the Anatomifts were naturally led next to conhder, how thefe animal procefTes were carried on in the child, while in the womb of the mother. Accordingly the male and female or-> ganSv the appearances and contents of the pregnant uterus, the incubated egg, and every phaenomenon which could illuf- trate generation, became the favourite fubjedl for about thirty years, with the principal Anatomids of Europe. Thus It would appear to have been in theory : but in faff, I rather believe, that as Harvey’s mafter, Fabritius, laid the foundation for the difeovery of the circulation of the blood, by teaching him the valves of the veins, and thereby in- viting him to conhder that fubjedt, fo Fabritius, by his lec- tures, and by his elegant work, de formato feetu, ^ de forma- tione ovi ^ puUt, probably made that likewife a favourite fub- jedl with Dr. Harvey. But whether he took up the fubjedt of generation, in confequence of his difeovery of the circula- tion, or was led to it, by his honoured mafter Fabritius, he fpent a great deal of his time in the enquiry ; and publhhed his obfervations, in a book de generatione animaliumj in the year 1651, that is, hx years before his death. la [ so ] In a few years after this, Swammerdam, Van Horn, Steno^ and De Graaf, excited great attention to the fubjedt of ge- neration, by their fuppofed difcovery that the females of vi- viparous animals have ovaria, that is, clufters of eggs in their loins, like oviparous animals ; which, when impregnated by the male, are conveyed into the uterus : fo that a child is pro- duced from an egg, as well as a chick; with this difference, that one is hatched within, and the other without the body of the mother. Malpighi, a great Italian genius, fome time after, made conliderable advances upon the fubjedt of generation. He had the good fortune to be the firfl who ufed magnifying- glafles with addrefs, in tracing the hrft appearances in the formation of animals. He likewife made many other obfervations and improvements in the minutice of Anatomy, by his microfcopical labours ; and by cultivating comparative Anatomy. This diflinguifhed Anatomift gave the firfl: public fpecimen of his abilities, by printing a differtation on the lungs. Anno 1661 ; a period fo remarkable for the fludy of nature, that it would be injuflice to pafs it, without particular notice. The Italians, who gave not only eloquence, and the other fine arts, but fcience to the reft of Europe, were rifing up- wards from barbarity and ignorance, about the middle of the fifteenth century. They had then had Dante, Petrarch, Boccace, Emmanuel Chryfoloras, Leonard Aretin, Poggius, Philelphus, and feveral other learned men : but the number was only fuf- ficient to raife an appetite in the nation for Greek learning, till Conftantinople was facked in the year 1453, which makes the [ 5t ] the beginning of the firfl great revolution in the learning of modern times ; viz. the revival of the Greek, and great im- provement in the ftudy of the Latin language. In the courfe of the next hundred years, thefe improve- ments were advanced to the highelb perfedlion, and fpread very generally over Europe. In every country were found fome of the beft fcholars in the dead languages, that Lave appeared iince the decline of the Roman empire. Phyfic and Anatomy were then reftored to the bell condition to which the ftudy of Greek authors could bring them. In confequence of which, the Arabians began to be confulted only as com- mentators on Hippocrates, Ariftotle, and Galen. All later writers were degraded with the appellation of barbarians, and funk gradually in the efteem of the world, in proportion as the Greek language became more generally underftood, and as their beft writers both in the original drefs, and in good tranflations, were multiplied by printing. In the next hundred years, the Italians finding their own ftrength, the natural confequence of cultivating the human mind, ventured upon the more arduous undertaking of im- proving upon the Greeks themfelves.. This began with Ve- falius, about the middle of the fixteenth century. And from that time, in the fubfequent hundred years, the circulation of the blood, and many other important dodtrines, unknown to the ancients, had been fo generally adopted, and diffufed over Europe, that the learning of the Greeks in natural knowledge, was allowed to be imperfedt ; and -men of a more acute and afpiring caft of mind, after having gone through their fchooi education, were prompted to look with their own eyes into every part of nature. H It [ 52 ] It was at this happy time that Malpighi came forth, the great period for the ftudy of all natural things. At this time the Academy del Cimento arofe in Italy, the Royal Society in London, and the Royal Academy in Paris. And from that time, the important dodrine of rejeding all hypothefis, or ge- neral knov/ledgc, till a fufficient number of fads fhall have been afcertained, by careful obfervation, and judicious experiments, has been, every day, growing into more credit. That doc- trine was the fource of Sir Ifaac Newton’s, and of all the im- provements which have been made fince the middle of the feven- teenth century. Here it may be ufeful, as well as entertaining to obferve that novelties, and improvement of courfe, have always be- come fubjeds of emulation and contention, between young men, and the old. In the exercife of the mind, as well as of the body, young men are quick, eager, ambitious of be- ing diftinguithed, and often rafh. In adopting a new opinion, they have not to druggie with the habitual influence of a contrary opinion, to which they have long adapted all their other reafonings. Young men have likewife, very commonly, no diflike to pull down the magiderial didates of age; and old men can feldom bear, what they think an inverdon of the natural order of things, that youth diould indrud age. Of all men, teachers of every kind, bear this with the lead patience. For that reafon, we fee in fad, that the feniors of fchools, colleges and univerdties, have generally been the mod obdinate in fhutting out light, and claiming a birth-righ£ for opinion, as for property. A Httk [ 53 ] A little reflexion into human nature, will fliew, that va« nity is the principal fource of this abfurdity. All men with to be refpedable ; and mofl: of them carry about with them, through life, what they think a fecret, and yet what very . few of them can conceal, a conftant endeavour to pafs in the world, for what they are not ; for being more acute, more judicious, more ftudious and learned, than they really are. Thence, profeflbrs, enjoying the admiration of their young pupils, affume a decided and dictatorial character, affeCting to have gone to the bottom of every thing, and to have over- come every difficulty, either by the natural powers of the mind, or by feverity of itudy and perfeverance in the pur- fuit of knowledge. Under ^the influence of this paffion, they are mingling felf-applaufe with every doCtrine which they teach. It is eafy to fee, that fuch men will reffit new doc- trines with more obflinacy than the reft of mankind, per- haps with inveteracy, in proportion as the doClrines are well founded. They will be fenfible that all their fcholars who embrace the new opinion, will call to mind, many looks of importance, and expreffions of vanity, which muft now appear truely ridiculous. But thofe few teachers, who have had moderation enough to wifti for that refpeCl; only which they really deferved, have had the fatisfaCtion of knowing, that they could not be re- duced to that humiliating lituation, becaufe when they had doubts they avowed them ; where truth lay beyond their reach, they confefled their ignorance, with a decent and becoming fenfe of the imperfeCUons of human nature. Such men will always be ready to receive inftruCtion, and to embrace truth, from whatever quarter it may be prefented, H 2 What What Malpighi fays, of the eitbrts made to refill: his firft new dodrines, is fo much to oar purpofe, that we mud give the fubftance of it in a few words. Op. Pofth. p. 20, 2 -j. ** In the mean time, fays he, contentions being railed among Iludious men, efpecially the younger, both theoretical and pradical, and the new dodrines growing daily into more cre- dit, the fenior profelTors were inflamed to fuch a pitch, that in order to root out heretical innovations in philofophy and phyfic, they endeavoured to pafs a law, whereby every gra- duate fhould be obliged to take the following additional claufe. to his folemn oath on taking his degree j viz. You (hall like- wife fwear, that you will preferve and defend, the dodrine taught in the univerfity of Bononia, viz. that of Hippocra- tes, Arifrotle, and Galen, which has now been approved of for fo many ages j and that you will not permit their pria- ciples and conclufions, to be overturned by any perfon, as far as in you lies.— prt? toto tui pojj'e is the expreffion. But, fays our author, this was dropt, and the liberty of philofa- phizing with freedom remains to this dayf’ In the microfcopic part of Anatomy, he was well feconded by Leeuwenhoek of Holland. They took up Anatomy where others had dropt it, and, by this new art, brought a number of amazing things to light. They difeovered the red globules of the blood ; they were enabled to fee the adual circula- ^ tion of the blood, in the tranfparent parts of living animals, and could meafure the velocity of its motion j they difeovered that the arteries and veins had no intermediate cells or fpungy fubftance, as Harvey and all the preceding Anatomifls had fuppofed, but communicated one with the other, by a conti- aiuation of the fame tube. Leeuwenhoek [ 55 ]. Leeuwenhoek was in great fame likewife, for his difeovery of the animalcula in the femen. Indeed there was fcarcely a part of tlie body, folid or fluid, which efcaped his exami- nation j and he almoft every where found, that what appeared to the naked eye, to be rude, undigefled matter, was in re- ality a beautiful and regular compound. In the latter part of the lafl: century. Anatomy made two great Heps, by the invention of injedlions, and the method of making what we commonly call preparations. Thefe two modern arts have really been of infinite ufe to Anatomy ; and befides have introduced an elegance into our adminifirations, which in former times could not have been fuppofed to be poflible. They arofe in Holland under Swammerdam and Ruyfch, and afterwards in England under Cowper, St. Andre, and others, where they have been greatly improved. And from England, they are of late years fpreading to all parts of the BritilE dominions, to France, Italy, and other parts of Europe. I fay from England, becaufe the arts of making fine injections, and preparations, feem to have been almoft peculiar to Hol- land and England ; and, the Anatomifls, who have excelled in that way, have generally made a fecret of their methods and improvements till within the lafl: thirty years, when all thefe arts have been conftantly taught in public courfes of Amatomy here. Were the great Harvey to rife from his grave, to examine what has been done flnee his time, I imagine that nothing would give him more pleafure, than to view v/ith attention, the cabinets of fome of the Anatomifts of the prefent times. He, and the Anatomifls of former ages, had no other know- ledge of the blood-velTels, than what they were able to coi- led!: / , [ 56 ] left from laborious diiledions, and from examining the fmaller branches of them, upon fome lucky occafion, when they were found mere than commonly loaded with red blood. But filling the vafcular fyftem with a bright coloured wax, enables us to trace the large veffels with great eafe, renders the fmaller much more confpicuous, and makes thoufands of the very minute ones vifible, which from their delicacy, and the tranfparency of their natural contents, are otherwife im- perceptible. The modern art of corroding the flefhy parts with a men.‘- f^ruuniy and of leaving the moulded wax entire, is fo ex- ceedingly ufeful, and at the fame time fo ornamental, that it does great honour to the ingenious inventor. Dr. Ni- cholls. The wax-work art of the moderns, might deferve notice in any hiftory of Anatomy, if the mailers in that way, had not been fo carelefs in their imitation. Many of the wax- hgures which I have feen, are fo tawdry, with a fhew of unnatural colours, and fo very incorredt in the circumflances of figure, fituation, and the like, that, though they flrike a vulgar eye with admiration, they mult appear ridiculous to an Anatomifl. But thofe figures which are call in wax, plaifter, or lead, from the real fubjedt, and which of late years have been frequently made here, are, of courfe, very corredl in all the principal parts, and may be confidered as no infignificant acquifition to modern Anatomy. The proper, or principal ufe of this art, is, to preferve a very perfedt likenefs of fuch fubjedts as we but feldom can meet with, or cannot well preferve in a natural flate ; a fubjedt in pregnan- cy, for example. The [ 57 ]' The modern improved methods of preferving animal bodies, or parts of them, has been of the greatefl; fervice to Ana- tomy; efpecially in faving the time and labour of the Ana- tomill, in the nicer dilTeflions of the fmall parts of the body. For now, whatever he has prepared with care, he can pre- ferve; and the objedl is ready to be feen at any time. And, in the fame manner he can preferve anatomical curiohties, or rarities of every kind ; fuch as, parts that are uncommonly formed ; parts that are difcafed ; the parts of the pregnant uterus and its contents. Large colledlions of fuch curiohties, which modern Anatomifts are flriving, almofi: every where to procure, are of infinite fervice to the art ; efpecially in the hands of teachers. They give ftudents clear ideas about many things, which it is very efifential to know, and yet which it is impoffible that a teacher ihould be able to fliew otherwife, were he ever fo well fupplied with frefli fub» jedts. The Anatomifls of this century have improved Anatomy, and have made the ftudy of it much more eafy, by giving us more correft as well as more numerous figures. It is amazing to think of v/hat has been done in that time. We have had four large folio books of figures of the bones, viz__ Chefelden’s, Albinus’s, Sue’s, and Trew’s ; befides one which was long expedled from my old mafter and friend. Dr. James Douglas, and, which I wifh very much to have time to pub- lifh, as the plates are all in my pofTeffion. Of the mufcles, we have, had two large folios, one from Cowper, which is elegant, and one from Albinus, which, from the accuracy and labour of the work, we may fuppofe will never be matched or outdone. Of the blood-vefTds we have a large fo- lio from Dr, Haller, We have been in expedlation of having one t S8 ] one upon the nerves from Dr. Meckel. We have had Al- binus’s, Roederer’s, and Jenty’s upon the pregnant uterus; and within thefe two years, as moft of you know, one has been publilhed here, which is allowed to be inferior to no book of Anatomy j whether we confider the accuracy with which the natural appearances are reprefented, or the elegance both of the engravings and of the prefs-work. But it would be endlefs to mention the anatomical figures that have been publilhed in this century, of particular and fmaller parts of the body, by Morgagni, Ruyfch, Valfalva, Sandtorini, Heifter, Vater, Cant, Zinn, Meckel, Zimmerman, Walther, Haller, and two or three hundred more. In our own times, after fchools of Anatomy have long fiourilhed in all the civilized nations of Europe, and when from the number of men who have been employed in fuch refearches, it might have been imagined that difeoveries were exhaufied. Providence has allowed me a greater (hare of that fort of honour which is generally given to difeoverers, than I could have expedled. I think I have proved, that the lymphatic vefiTels are the abforbing vefiTels, all over the body ; that they are the fame as the ladeals ; and that thefe altogether, with the thoracic dud, conftitute one great and general fyftem, difperfed through the whole body for abforption j that this fyftem only does abforb, and not the veins; that it ferves to take up, and convey, whatever is to make, or to be mixed with the blood, from the fidn, from the inteftinal canal, and from all the in- ternal cavities or furfaces w'hatever. This difeovery gains credit daily, both at honae and abroad, to fuch a degree, that [ 59 J fEat I believe we may now fay, that it is almofl univerfally adopted : and, if we miftake not, in a proper time, it will be allowed to be the greateft difcovery, both in phyfiology and in pathology, that Anatomy has fuggefled, lince the dif« covery of the circulation. Having ventured to throw out fo bold a propoiltion, that my credit may not fuffer through want of a little reflexion upon the fubjedt, I mufl: afk leave to explain my opinion. The difcovery of a particular facit, with regard only to a particular organ in the body j fuch as, the dudt of a gland ; or, the ufe of a glands an undefcribed mufcle, or artery, or vein i or any new organ found out or explained ; all fuch difcoveries are certainly trifling, when compared with the in- trodudtion of a new general fyflem, which is interwoven with, and performs a peculiar and important fundtion in every part of the body j fo important indeed, that it was neceflary, and accordingly has flnce been adtually found out, in brutes like- wife, in birds, and in fifh. Such is the difcovery of the ab- forbing fyftem : and every perfon, who is really an Anato- mifl:, or Phyfiologifl:, will, upon a little reflexion, admit what has been advanced; and, looking over the whole progrefs of Anatomy, he will allow, that flnce the days of Ariftotle, there have been only two great inventions in the phyflology of our bodies ; to wit, the circulation of the blood, and the abforbent fyftem. And, were we to draw a parallel, with regard to the circumfliances of thefe two difcoveries, they would be found more flmilar than could have been expedted : at prefent I fhall only obferve, that hov/ever important I think the difcovery of the true ufe of the abforbent fyftem, I never thought the author entitled to much honour, for having made out (as I faid of the circulation.) what was obvious to any I perfon,. I 6o 3 perfon, who would but think upon the rubje(fi: without prejudice* The Anatomifts of all Europe, for a hundred years, in the moft improved ftate of our art, from all their enquiries were of opinion, that the lymphatic fyftem was wanting in birds and fifhes. But having found out the importance of th abforbent fyhem in man, and in all quadrupeds, we could not reft fatisfied, that it was wanting in the other two great clalTes of animals ; and kept that objedl, and every thing that could throw light upon the abforbent fyftem, conftant-ly in view. Accordingly, my brother, Mr. John Hunter, whom I bred to pradtical Anatomy, and who worked for me, and attended my difledling-room, and read fome ledtures for me many years, found fome lymphatics, firft in birds, and then in a crocodile. Next, Mr. Hewfon, whom I firft bred to Anatomy, and then took into my houfe to work for me, and under my di- redlion, in pradtical Anatomy, to attend my difiedling-room, and read fome iedlures as my partner, which he did for a number of years ; Mr. Hewfon, I fay, by a continued courfe cf obfervations and experiments made in this houfe^, difcovered and fully demonftrated the lymphatics and ladleals, both in birds and fifties : which confirmed the ufe and importance of the abforbent fyftem in the human body ; and in comparative Anatomy was one of the greateft improvements that could have been made, to eftablifta the univerfality of nature’s laws in animal bodies, , And, * In Dr. Hunter’s diiTefting-rooms in 'Windmill-Street. [ 6i ] And, laft of all, Mr. Cruiklhank, whom I likewife bred to Anatomy, and took into my houfe upon the fame plan, with the opportunities which he has had in this place, and by being particularly attentive to the lymphatic fyftem, at my defire, has traced the ramifications of that fyftem in al- moft every part of the body ^ and from his diifedlions, figures have been made, which, with what I had before, will enable us to publifii (we hope, in a little time) a full account of the whole fyftem, illuftrated by accurate engravings^. The gravid uterus is a fubjedt likewife, which has afforded me opportunities of making confiderable improvements j par» ticularly one very important difcovery ; viz. that the internal membrane of the uterus^ which I have named decidua^ con- ftitutes the exterior part of the fecimdinesy or after-birth f and feparates' from the reft of the uterus every time that a woman either bears a child or fuffers a mifcarriage. This difcovery includes another, to wit, that the placenta is partly made up of an excrefcence or efflorefcence from the uterus itfelf. Thefe difcoveries are of the utmoft confequence, both in the phyfiological queftion about the connedlion between the mother and child ; and likewife in explaining the phasnomena of births and abortions, as well as in regulating our prac«^ tree. Befides' the more capital improvements above mentioned, I have been fortunate enough to make feveral others, not unim- portant, with regard efpecially to difeafes ; which, as they occur in the courfe of ledlures, you will fee, have had con- fiderable influence in improving phyfic, furgery, and midv/ifery,. I 2 You^ *■ It is hoped thatthe publk may ftill have this work laid before them.- [ 62 ] You will fee that even new difeafes (fuch- as, the varicofs aneuryfm, and the retroverted uterus) have been made out, and a proper and fuccefsful treatment recommended; by which' feveral lives have been already faved, in cafes which, other- wife, muji have proved fatal. This aflhrds me an heart-felt comfort, now, when years and reflexion have given me the clearefl: view of the uncer- tainty, the fhortnefs, and the miferies of human life. I fm- cerely pray that a great number of you may enjoy fuch a comfort in the clofe of life ; when, I am certain, the mofl; diligent, the moft confcientious, and the mofl; humane, among you all, will moft ardently wifli, that you could have done flill more fervice to the caufe of your poor diftrefled fellow- creatures. To conclude : the hiflory of Anatomy fhould ftimulate us all to cultivate it with diligence; when we fee, that Anato- mifts, in all ages, have made ufeful difcoveries, and in con- fequence thereof, have enjoyed the advantages of reputation in their profeflion ; aind when we fee that the fubjedt is ftill fo far from being exhaufted, that it is to this day, and mufl: be to the end of time, ^new, entertaining, ufeful, and inex- hauflible. End of Lecture I. / LECTURE II. STRONOMY and Anatomy, as Fontenelle obferves. are the ftudies which prefent us with the moft flriking view of the two greateft attributes of the Supreme Being. The firft of thefe fills the mind with the idea of his im- menfity, in the largenefs, diftances, and number of the heavenly bodies ; the laft, afionifhes with his intelligence, and art, in the variety and delicacy of animal mechanifm. The human body has been, commonly enough known, by" the name of microcofmus j as if it did not differ fo much from the univerfal fyflem of nature, in the fymmetry and num- ber of its parts, as in their fize. t Galen’s excellent treatife of the ufe of the parts, was compofed as a profe hymn to the Creator; and abounds with as irrefiflible proofs of a fupreme Caufe, and governing Pro- vidence, as we find in modern phyfico-theology. And Cicero dwells more on the firufture and ceconomy of animals, than on all the productions of nature befides, when he wants to prove the exigence of the gods, from the o.'-der and beauty of the univerfe. He there takes a lurvey of the body of man m in a rnofl elegant fynopfis of Anatomy, and concludea thnSj, Quibus rebus expofitis, fatls docuilTe videor, hominis na-=- “ tura, quanto ornnes anteiret animantes. Ex quo debet “ intelligi, nec figiiram fitumque mcmbrorum, nec ingenii inentifque vim talem effici potuilTe fortuna.” The fatisfad;ion of mind which arifes from the fludy of Anatomy, and the influence which it muft naturally have upon our minds as philofophers, cannot be better conveyed than by the following paffage from the fame author j “ contuens animus, accepit ab his cognitionem deorum, ex “ qua oritur pietas : cui conjundla jiiflitia eft, reliquaeque virtutes : ex quibus vita beata exfiftit, par et fimilis deorum, ** nulla alia re nift immortalitate, quce nihil ad bene vi* vendum pertinet, cedens coeleftibus.’’ It would be endlefs to quote the animated pafTages of this- Ibrt, which are to be found in the phyftcians, philofophers,, and theologifts, who have conftdered the ftrudture and func- tions of animals, with a view towards the Creator. It is a view which ftrik.es me, with a moft awful convidllon j and when I fpeak of it, I feel that I muft fpeak from my own fenfes and obfervation. Who can know and confider the- thoufand evident proofs of the aftoniftiing art of the Crea- tor, in forming and fuftaining an animal body fuch as ours>. without feeling the moft: pleaftng enthuiiafm ? Can we fe- rioufly refledl upon this awful fubjedt, without being almoft loft: in adoration ? without longing for another life after this, in which we may be gratified with the higheft enjoyment,, which our faculties and nature feem capable of, the feeing and comprehending the whole plan of the Creator, in form- ing the univerfe, and in, directing all its operations, Thg [ 6 s ] The maa who is really an Anatomlit, yet does not fee and feel what I have endeavoured to exprefs in words, what« ever he may be in other refpecfls, mufl: certainly labour under a dead palfey, in one part of his mind. Milton could look upon the fun, at noon, without feeing light. There was no apparent defedt in his eye, but the nerves of that part were infenhbic;. But, the more imnaediate purpofes of Anatomy, concern thofe who are to be the guardians of health ; as this ftudy is neceifary to lay a foundation for all the branches of medi« cine. The more we know of our fabrick, the more reafon wc have to believe, that if our fenfes were more acute, and our judgment more enlarged, we (hould be able to trace many fprings of life, which are now hidden from us : by the fame fagacity we fhould difeover the true caufes and nature of difeafes j and thereby be enabled to reftore the health of many, who are now, from our more confined knowledge, faid to labour under incurable diforders. By fuch an intimate ac» quaintance v/ith the ceconomy of our bodies, we fhould dif= cover even the feeds of difeafes 5 and deflroy them, before they had taken root in the confUtution. This indeed is a pitch of knowledge which we mud; not expedb to attain. But furely we may go fome way j and therefore let us endeavour to go as far as we can. And if we con- fider, that health and difeafe are the oppofites of each other, there can be no doubt, that the ftudy of the natural date of the body, which cenditutes the one, mud be the dired road to the knowledge of the other. What t 66 ] What has been faid of the ufefulnefs of Anatomy in phyric? will only be called in queftion, by -the more illiterate em- pyrics among phyficians. They would difcourage others from the purfuit of knowledge, which they have not themfelvcs, and which therefore they cannot know the value of ; and tell us that a little of Anatomy is enough for a phyfician. Let us judge of this queftion, by colleding the opinions- of the raoft eminent phyficians of different countries and ages. If we have recourfe to Hippocrates, Celfus, Galen, Rhazcs, Avicenna, Harvey, Pitcairn, Boerhaave, Hoffman, and Mead‘, we fhall find that all of them, either wrote upon Anatomy, or taught it. One of the moft: unexceptionable teftimonies in our favour, is that of Sydenham ; who is allowed, by all parties, to have been a moft fagacious obferver, and a moft excellent pradical phylician. In his treatife de Hydropet he quotes a paffage from Hippocrates, and then adds, “ Attamen [ne vel divinus hie audlor, erroris ullatenus infimulatur, vel ex hoc loco empiric! ignorantiae fuae patrocinium qusrant] aperte dicam, me, quantum attentiftima cogitatione, eaque ad praxin re- lata, adfequi valeam, utcunque exiftimare, quod neeeffe om- nino fit, ut medicus ftrufturam human! corporis probe calleat j quo redius veras ideas, et nature et caufarum quo- ** rundara morborum, animo concipere ac formare queat.” * Here you will obferve, that Sydenham’s pen wrote nothing but what his judgment and candour didated. He does, not fay, of allt but of fome and he might very well have faid, f a great number of difeafes. Some phyficians, of a differ- ent opinion, argue thus, as I have been informed; The cure [ ^7 ] of difeafes, is to be confidered as a matter of fad and obfervation ; and is not to be found out, or improved, ** by difleding dead bodies : the bark cures fevers ; mercury “ cures venereal diforders ; a little oil cures the bite of a viper j and nothing, yet known, cures the bite of a mad dog,” . An argument which draws univerfality from fome particulars, all logicians will condemn, as inconclufive. It were juft as reafonable to aftert, that the bark, and mercury are ufeiefs, in the cure of difeafes, becaufe the bark does not cure a pox ; nor mercury, an intermittent ; or, becaufe neither of them cures all diforders. It is by Anatomy alone, that we know the true nature, and therefore the moft proper cure of the greateft number of local difeafes. That Anatomy is the very balls of furgery every body al- lows. It is dilTedion alone that can teach us, where we may cut the living body, with freedom and difpatch j and where we may venture, with great circumfpedlion and delicacy j and where we muft not, upon any account, attempt it. This informs the gives dexterity to the hand^ and familiarizes the heart with a fort of neceftary inhumanity, the ufe of cutting- inftruments upon our fellow-creatures. Were it poflible to doubt of the advantages, which arife in Surgery, from the knowledge of Anatomy, we might have ample conviflion, by comparing the prefent pradlice with that of the ancients : and upon tracing the improvements which have been made in later times, they would be found, ge- nerally, to' have fprung from a more accurate knowledge of the parts concerned. And if at any time an accident, or fomething elfe, gave the firft rife to an ufeful invention, it was Anatomy that regulated, improved, and eftablilhed it. K In [ 68 ] In the courfe of thefe ledares, both when we examine the parts themfelves, and v.^'hen we coniider the chirurgicai operations we fhall fee the ftridi connedlion between Anatomy and Surgery : how much the laft is demonftrative, clear, and infallible, when it receives the full lights from the former j how uncertain without them. In the hands of a good Ana- tomili, furgery is a falutary, a divine art ; but when prac- tifed by men who know not the hrudure of the human body, it often becomes barbarous and criminaL All that has been now advanced, concerning the ufefulnefs of Anatomy in phyfic and furgery, is indeed fo- apparent, fo demonflrable, that in our days it is not controverted, by thofe in the profeflion who have any pretence to be judges j or any character to give weight to their opinion,. But, my duty to you, my fincere defire to ferve the public, obliges me to urge the queflion much farther. I mufl infill: upon it, and will beg of you to believe, that it is not barely 2. general knowledge of Anatomy, that is neceffary ; but the mofl par- ticular, and the moil accurate, that can be acquired. It is not the common attendance upon a courfe or two of anato- mical ledtures; but an attentive and perfevering fludy; an intimate acquaintance with the pradlical part while we are in the courfe of education ; and alfo, though this be generally negiedted, a continued, or frequent exercife of the art, as long as we continue in the pradtice of phyfic or furgery. When we hear any man of the profeflion, talking of all the knowledge of Anatomy that is neceffary for a phyfician, and of as much as a furgeon needs to know, we cannot but lament the fingularly hard fortune of his patients; firfl: in be- ing fick, or difeafed, and then, in falling under the care of fo fo Ignorant a counfellor. Who is the man of pradice and irx- tegrity, that can lay his hand upon his heart, and fay, that he has not, in fome cafe or other, had occafion for all his anatomical knowledge ; and who has not wiflaed, at times, that he had been polTeffed of more ? Who, then, are the men in the profeffion, that would perfuade ftudents, that a little of Anatomy is enough for a phyfician, and a little more too much for a furgeon ? God help them ! They have it not themfelves, and are afraid that others Ihould get it. Many of the old generation among us, and it is to be feared fome of the younger too, never underftood Anatomy well enough to know its true value : and behdes, many of them have no way left of preferving any rank in the profeffion, but that of undervaluing and ridiculing improvements j they would have young men continue as ignorant as themfelves, that their own wants may efcape obfervation. But, thank heaven ! fuch arts cannot prevail. Knowledge and Improvements gain ground every day ; and ignorant men are perpetually feen in humi- liating fituations. Men have begun to reafon more corredly ; to exercife their own judgment, upon their obfervations j and when that comes to be the cafe generally, there mud be an end to the delufion j many dodrines of old phydcians, and of old women, will meet with proper contempt ; the tyranny of empty pomp and mydery in phyfic, will be driven out of the land, and forced to feek flielter among lefs cultivated focieties of men. The more clear and perfed our knowledge of every part of the body is, both in its found and morbid date, the better K2 we [ JO I we fhall underfEand the nature, and ftrength, and tendenc)?^ of its difeafes. Thence we fliali more readily and certainlyr learn to difcover a difeafe in its beginning.; to obftrudl its- progrefs ; to put it under difficulties; to prevent its gaining ftrength by the acquifition of auxiliaries ; to cut off its fup- plies of neceffaries ; and finally to drive it out. The comparifon of a phyfician to a general, is both ra- tional and inllrudlive. The human body under a difeafe, is the country which labours under a civil war or invafion j- the phyfician is, or ffiould be, the didlator and general, who is to take the command, and to diredf all the neceffary ope- rations. To do his duty with full advantage, a general, be- fides other acquirements, ufeful in his profeffion, muff make himfelf mafter of the Anatomy and Phyjiology.^ as we may call it, of the country. He may be faid to be maffer of the Anato?ny of the country, when he knows the figure, di- menfion, fituation, and connection, of all the principal confti- tuent parts ; fuch as, the lakes, rivers, manffies, mountains,, precipices, plains, woods, roads, paffes, fords, towns, fortifi- cations, &c. By the Phyjiology of the country, which he ought likewife to underftand, is meant, all the variety of aClive influence, which is produced by the inhabitants. If the general be well inffruffcd in all thefe points, he will find a hundred occafions of drawing advantages from them ^ and without fuch knowledge, he will be for ever expofed to fome fatal blunder. What contempt would the King of Pruffia, or Prince Fer- dinand entertain, for any officer, who would fay, that a mo- derate (hare of that fort of knowledge, is fufficient for a [ 7 ^ ] general ? The famed retreat of the ten thoufand Greeks from Perha, v/ould have been eafily effected, if their leaders had known the country through which they were to pafs ; their dangers, difappointments, and diftrefl'es, arofe princi- pally from their ignorance of the Anatomy of that part af the globe. The moft fpecious argument, which ignorance has been able to fuggeil:, againft the ufefulnefs of much anatomical Ifudy, is a piece of mere fophiflry > it is, that the exadf knoudedge of all the parts of our body, in minute detail, cannot be ufeful ; fuch as, that of many little mufcles, and arteries, and veins, and nerves, and little procelfes or other features ©f bones, which are deferibed by anatomical writers. The fadt, as here flated, is true ^ but the inference drawn from it, is net jud. Many Anatomifts, indeed, have been blame- able in this refped > they have dwelt upon trifling minutice^ ©bjedls adapted to their own minds. All fenhble dudents, mud have been difguded with the common tirefome, and ufelefs defeription, of the Jeparated bones of the head, and of the precife attachment of all the mufcles of the body j they mud have been fick of the deferiptions of the fmaller branches of blood-vedels, and of nerves. Men who drudge without com- prehenfion, treat thofe objedts in their ledlures and waitings, with all the folemnity and refpedl: which is due to ufeful enquiries. Men of more underdanding mud defpife them^ Eut let us remember, that when fuch unimportant fubjedls arc given up, there are more ufeful facts to be learned in Anatomy, than mod naen can have opportunities of ac- q_uiring. Befides t 72 ] Befides the knowledge of our body, through all the va- riety of its Jlrutiure and operations in a found flate, it is by Anatomy only that we can arrive at the knowledge of the true nature of mod: of the dlfeafes which afflid; humanity. The fymptoms of many diforders arc often equivocal j and difeafes themfelves are thence frequently mifliaken, even by fenfible, experienced, and attentive phyficians. But by ana- tomical examination after death, we can with certainty find out the miftake, and learn to avoid it, in any fimilar cafe* Fatal miftakes of that kind are Blocking to humanity; but it would be invidious, and even cruel, to expofe fuch as I inyfelf have known ; becaufe it would involve the innocent with the guilty ; as in our profellion, the belt are liable to error^ It becomes us all to be humble, to confefs our ig- norance, and to encourage every ftudy that is likely to im- prove us. This advantage, which we receive from Anatomy, of find- ing out the real difeafe after death, has been fo generally adopted by the moderns, that the cafes already publifhed are almofl innumerable ; Mangetus, Morgagni, indeed many of the befl: modern writings in pbyfic are full of them. And if we look among the phyficians of the beft character, and obferve thofe who have the art itfelf, rather than the craft of the profeflion at heart; we fliall find them conftantly taking pains to procure leave to examine the bodies of their patients after death ; defirous that it may be done by expe- rienced Anatomifls (a circumftance often of the higheft im- portance) and unhappy when they cannot procure this op- portunity of improving themfelves, and their art. Were [ 73 J Vv’'ere T to guefs at the moH: probable future improve- ments in phyfjc, I fliould fay, that they would arife from a more general, and more accurate examination of difeafej after death. And were I to place a man of proper talents^ in the mod; diredl road for becoming truely great in his profeliion, I would chufe a good prafHcal Anatomift, and put ■him into a large hofpital to attend the ficky and diffedl the dead. After having confidered the rife, and progrefs of Anatomy j the various difcoveries that have been made in it, from time to time ; the great number of diligent obfervers who have applied themfelves to this art ; and the importance of the fludy, not only for the prevention and cure of difeafes, but in furnilhing the livelieft proofs of divine wifdom ; the fol- lowing quedions feem naturally to arife. For what purpofe is there fuch a variety of parts in the human body ? Why fuch a complication of nice and tender machinery ? Why was there not rather a more limple, lefs delicate, and iefs expenfive frame ? That beginners in the dudy of Anatomy, may acquire a fatisfadory general idea of their fubjedl, we fhall furnilh them with clear anfv\’ers to all fuch quedions. Let us then, in our imagination, make a man : in other words, let us fup- pofe that the rjiindy or immaterial part, is to be placed in a corporeal fabric, to hold a correfpondence with other ma- terial beings by the intervention of the body; and, then confider, a priori^ what will be wanted for her accommo- dation. In this enquiry, we diall plainly fee the necedity, or advantage, and therefore, the Jinal caufe of mod of the part&5 [■74 ] part?, which we a^lually find in the human body. And if we confider that, in order to anfwer Ibme of the requifites, human wit and invention would be very infufiicient ; we need not be furprized, if we meet with fome parts of the body, whofe ufe we cannot yet make out, and with fome opera- tions or fun except the bones, moh; of them retain little of their natu- ral fize and flaape. We may be affured, therefore, that it is wrong to take ideas of the parts of our body from pre- parations, when they can be feen diftindly in the freOi fub« jed. It is pity that preparations, which may be made fo ufe- ful to Anatomy, fliould in any way become detrimental to it. Yet it is certain, that in fome courfes formerly given, ftudents were rather amufed with elegant preparations, than inilruded in the elTentials of folid Anatomy. We have known gentlemen of fenfe, learning, and application, attend repeated courfes of that . fort j and after all confefs, that upon open- ing a dead body, they could fcarcely point out the different vifcera. Might we not afk any man of common fenfe, what idea he can have of the nerves, for inflance, if he has only feen them when they have been diffeded from the body, pined out and dryed upon a flat board ? Or what his notions are, of that foft and fpungy membrane which lines the nofe, if he has only feen it dryed upon the bones, full of vermilion veflels, and covered with a fhining varnifh ? Preparations fhould not be ufed as fubflitutes for a body; but fupplementally, to demonflrate fuch circumftances clearly* as are intricate, confufed, or invifible in the frefh fubjed. And, 91 And, a demonflrator who makes line preparations, fhould be very much upon his guard ; other wife, he will be apt to make an abufe of preparations j he will, infenhbly, contract a partiality to that in which he excels ; the elegance of preparations is delulive with fcudents j and the more they are ufed, there will be lefs expence and trouble with fre£h fub- jedls. Some Anatomifls in our times, endeavoured to propagate and fupport a very ill grounded opinion, viz, that in the ftudy of Anatomy, preparations are almoll always either ufe- lefs, or hurtful : ujelefs^ they faid, becaufe the fame things might be feen in a more natural Ifate; and hurtful^ becaufe they give falfe ideas, inafmuch as the natural condition of the part is changed. One of thofe Anatomifts would de- claim upon injedions firetching the blood-veffels beyond their natural flate ; and would plead, that Morgagni and Window, hardly made any ufe of preparations. Another would ha- rangue in the fame ftile, growing angry as he went on ; and then would pretend to give a clear proof of his fuppofition, by (hewing his pupils a dried, flirunk, and corrugated mufcle, as a preparation : which he would compare with a beautiful, frefh diffeded mufcle, in its natural flate and fituation; and then appeal to their eyes for convidion. Here was fome plaufibility of argument, drawn out of mifreprefenta- tion and delufion. In fad, they were both out of humour with, and jealous of a third perfon, who was making ufe of preparations fuccefsfally j and they had almofl none: which lafl circumflance alone, is enough to render it at lead, pro- blematical, whether their condud was not an illudration of the well known fable of the four grapes. N Both [ 92 ] Both of thofe gentlernsn demon (Ira ted the bones, not in a freOi fubjed:, and in their natural (late, with all their marrow and periofteum, and tendons, and ligaments ; but upon the artificial (lieleton ; that is, - upon a preparation made by boiling and deeping, for the fake of (liewing more clearly the figure and features of bones. This preparation they ufed becaufe it was very ufeful to (Indents, and becaufe they could make it : but fuch preparations as they had not, either be- caufe they could not, or would not, take the pains to make them : they faid were ufelefs or hurtful. In a matter fo evident and demonftrable as the ufefulnefs of preparations, I not only can rely upon my own judge- ment, but I have the concurring opinion of all the fenfible men who ever honoured me with their attendance. I never talked with one of them, who did not fay that he received much improvement from what he faw exhibited in prepa- rations. The appearances of difeafes, except now and then by accident, cannot be otherwife demonftrated. What advan- tages then mud a teacher have, were it only in this way, who by preparations can demondrate, in many hundred indances, the changes which are adlually produced in the human body, by different difeafes. In my fituation, and at this time of life, it cannot be -y- fuppofed that I (hould take the trouble of giving ledlures, if I did not condder it as a duty that I owe to the public. Every man (hould be held as a criminal who locks up his talent, whatever it may be. Mine, from nature was fmall ; but, by application and perfeverance, it has grown to be condderable. Hitherto it has been diligently employed for the advantage of others 5 and at the fame time it has brought to myfelf^ [ 93 ] myfelf, all the advantages which I have been ambitioas of gaining. I have colle6led 'fuch an anatomical apparatus, as was never brought together in any age or country. The fpecimens of difeafes, efpecially, are ineflimable, and muft render a courfe of ledlures here, inftrudlive and ufeful to any man, wherever he may have fludied, or whatever he may have feen. And, it may be prefumed, that, from knowing my own colledlion beft, and from long experience in de- monftrating them, I am better qualified to make them ufe- ful to the v/orld, than at this time, any other man can be. That confideration has induced me to go on with my lec- tures : and, with that viewj I am much more ambitious of a few ftudents, who will attend with diligence, and with a fincere defire of improvement, than of a great number. The firfl: will give me fatisfaftion and credit j the laft would only bring in a larger fum of money, which could be no equivalent for the vexation of feeing young men throwing away their time, when fuch an opportunity is offered. Fo^ the future, money can be of no ufe to me, but for acquiring and communicating fcience ; which fhall be my objedl, as far, and as long as I can purfue it. In treating of the phyfiology, it is very difficult to fay, what plan we fhould follow ; for, every method which has been yet propofed, is attended with manifefl inconvenience. The powers anti operations of the machine, have fuch a dependence on one another, fuch connexions and reciprocal influence, that they cannot well be underftood, or explained, feparately. In this fenfe, our body may be compared to a circular chain of powers, in which nothing is firfl, or lafl; nothing folitary or independent ; fo that wherever we begin, we find that there is fomething preceding, which we ought to have N 2 known. [ 94 ] known. If we begin with the brain and the nerves, for ex- ample, we fhall find, that thefe cannot exift, even in idea, without the heart: and if we fet out with the heart and vafcular fydem, we tliall prefently be fenfible, that the brain and nerves mufi: be fuppofed : or, fliould we take up the mouth, and follow the courfe of the aliment, we ihould fee that the very firft organ which prefented itfelf, fuppofed the exigence both of the heart and brain. Wherefore, 'we 'flaall incorporate the Phyfiology with the Anatomy ; by attempting to explain the functions, when we have demonftrated the or- gans. / Tlae animal oeconorny, indeed, is fo extenfive a field, and takes fo much light from philofophy, and other arts, that in moft univerfities, it has been found neceffary to appoint two profelTors, one for Anatomy, and the other for the Phyfiold^. Undoubtedly the man who makes, it his bufinefs, to invehi- gate every thing relating to the flmclure of the human body, mull be, cceteris paribus, the fittell perfon to explain its ope- rations ; and there cannot be a more proper occalion, than when the parts are before us. And, yet, in fome fenfe, it is juft the reverfe : for, every good Anatomift, who has a cool head, and keeps a guard over his imagination, knows, that many of the received hypothefes in ’Phyfiology, are built on very loofe foundations, and liable to weighty objedions or, demonftrably repugnant to what we already know of the ftrudure of our body. So that if the Anatomift is weak enough, to think that he can, or that he muft explain, all the operations of the machine, he will certainly make partial diffedions, miflead himfelf and others, and put a thoufand little arts in pradice, to make the ftrudure ccrrefpond with the ima- ginary afe. This This unguarded proceeding, which has been too much the manner of teachers, though it may ftrike weak, unculti- vated minds with reverence, yet by men of finer inteliedts it is conftrued, with great propriety, an indignity thrown out againfl the great Author of all things. It is indirectly paffing ofF our own trifling fchemes, and filly conceits, for his infinitely wife and extenfive views. It is not fliewing us what we are, but what we Jlioiild have been\ and in effedt, therefore, is a piece of prefumption, which moves the indignation of all men, who look upon the works of nature with that humi- lity and awe, v/hich the dignity of the objedl demands, I muft therefore expedf, that you will not hereafter be furprized, when you find me avowing great ignorance, in many of the mofl; confiderable queftions relating to animal operations ; fuch as, fenfation, motion, refpiration, digeftion> generation, &c. In my opinion all thefe fubjedts are much lefs underffood, than moft people think them. Our vanity deceives us, and perfuades us that we have got the whole, as foon as we have acquired a fmattering of natural know- ledge. f)fsnce it is, that the different fedts of Phyfiologiils, have endeavoured "to explain animal fundlions upon fuch different principles. Hence, for example, to account for digeffion, fome have made the ffomach a mill ; fome would have it to be a ftewing-pot ; and fome a wort-trough : yet all the while, one would have thought that it muff have been very evident, that the flomach was neither a mill, nor a flewing-pot, nor a wort-trough, nor any thing but a flomach. This fpecies of philofophy, has prevailed in many parts of Phyfiology i and makes up a great part of what has been commonly taught, as found and ufeful pbyfiological learning. One thing, of peculiar properties and powers, has been explained [ 9 * ] by another, ofdlfFerent properties and powers, as abfardly, as if colours had been explained by founds. Animal fundions, gene- rally fpeaking, are of a peculiar nature; and like nothing which is to be found in the works of art, or wherever there is not animation and life : and, had Phyfielogifts fpcnt that time in making accurate obfervations upon animals themfelves, which has been thrown away upon mechanical and chemi- cal vifions, by this time we might have underftood animal principles and proceffes, better than we now do. The capital errors which have prevailed in different ages in the philofophy of human bodies, are the following: 1. The palpable abfurdity of the older Anatomifls, in de- fcribing the ftrudure, and fettling the fundions of our body, by an examination made on brutes only — now fully exploded. 2. An abfurdity, prevalent with many moderns, that of finding out, and afcertaining the. chemical changes produced in our juices, by experiments made on dead matter out of the body. 3. The third, an error which has been very generally in- troduced into the writings of the beft modern authors, is the drawing conclufions with regard to the living body, from experiments made upon the dead body. This, in many cafes, will be found to be fallacious ; and on that account many dodrines and arguments of Kaw, Boerhaave, and others, will in a little time be exploded. 4. A firnilar abfurdity, that of explaining the fundions of our body, upon mechanical principles ; arguing ftill from dead to living matter. To [ 97 ] To Hiew the flate of Phyfiology in this country, as late as the ^earlier part of my life, I may quote a palTage from Dr. Friend’s Hiftory of Phyfic, vol. ii. page 398, which was the prevailing opinion of the times, fupported by Dr. Mead, we might al- moft fay by the college of phyficians, and univerfities of Oxford and Cambridge. Speaking of the errors of modern Phyfiologifts^ he fays, “ It were to be wilhed, that fome able hand would fet this matter in a true light, and illuftrate it as far as may be, by the unalterable laws which nature has imprelfed upon all matter and motion: and indeed lince the human body is nothing elfe but a fine contexture of folids and fluids, w^hich obferve the rules mechayiiftriy it is amazing to find that men fliould think of any other principles than the mechanical to explain it by. Would any one go fo much out of the way, as to account for the mo- tions of a watch, from the precarious dodlrine of acid and alkaliV" Inftead of attempting to give any compleat fyflem of Phy- fiology, we propofe to incorporate a fketch of it only, and upon the following plan. 1. To lay before you the flrudlure of the parts, and the known phaenomena, as data. 2. Then to explain briefly, the rnofl prevailing opinions or hypothefes, with the principal arguments that have been brought, either to fupport, or to overturn them. 3. In fome inftances to give our own opinion with cau- tion and referve; but more generally to leave your judge- ments free, that enquiry and improvement may go on. Left I fhould be thought too fhort in the phyflological part, I would beg leave to obferve, that, as far as it is yet known. [ 98 ] known, or has been explained by Haller, and the be/l of the moderns, it may be eafily acquired by a ftudent, without a mafter, provided the ftudent is acquainted with philofophy and chemiftry, and is an expert and ready Anatomift; for with thefe qualifications he can read any phyfiological book, and can underftand it as faft as he reads. In this age, when fo much has been printed upon the fub- jedt, there is almofi; as little inducement to attend ledlures upon Phyfiology, as there would be for gentlemen to at- tend ledlures upon government, or upon the hiftory of Eng- land. Ledures upon fubjeds which are perfedly intelligible in print, cannot be of much ufe, except when given by fome man of great abilities, who has laboured the fubjed, and who has made confiderable improvements, either in matter or in arrangement. In our branch, thofe teachers who take but little pains to demonftrate the parts of the body with precifion and clear- nefs, but fludy to captivate young minds with ingenious fpe- culation, will not leave a reputation that will outlive them half a century. When they ceafe from their labours, their labours are buried along with them. There never was a man, perhaps, more followed and admired in Phyfiology, than Boerhaave. I re- member the veneration he was held in ; and now, in the fpace of forty years, his Phyfiology is—it fliocks me to think in what a light it appears. Anatomical ledures being intended to ferve as a folid foundation for two fuch important arts as medicine and fur- gery, a teacher cannot take too much pains to render them lifeful : and if he be limited in time, it will require more particular 1 [ 99 3 particular care that the mod efTential things be well explain- ed. And with that view he rnufl; be fatisfied, with touching more lightly, fuch things as are of lefs importance; and even to pafs over many things of little ufe, though perhaps cu- rious ; for in the fludy of nature, there is no end, if we give way to curiofity. With this view of my fituation in life, I always have du- died, and diall continue my endeavours to employ the time that is given up to anatomical dudles, as ufefully to the du- dents as I can poffibly make it. And therefore (hall never aim at fliewing w'hat I know ; but labour to fhew, and de- fcribe, as clearly as poffible, what they ought to know. This plan rejefts all declamation, all parade, all wrangling, all fubtlety. To make a Ihew, and to appear learned and ingenious in natural knowledge, may flatter vanity : to know fa(ds, to feparate them from fuppofltions, to range and connedt them, to make them plain to ordinary capacities, and, above all, to point out the ufeful applications, is, in my opinion, much more laudable, and fhall be the objedl of my ambition. Allow us here to remove a falfe notion w'hich has been cir- culated, among thofe who have not had an opportunity of knowing better. They imagined, or, fhould J rather fay, they widied the world to imagine, that the ledlures given here, are upon the higher, the more curious and fpeculative parts of Anatomy ; and therefore above the comprehenflon of a be- ginner. This I pofltively deny ; and would recommend it to ftudents to judge of this queftion, by the teftimony of thofe who mufl: be the bell: judges ; thofe who have adlually at- tended the courfe. And when they take advice upon the befl: plan for their fludies, let them remember, that few men can O divefl: [ 100 ] dived themfelves of prejudice, and that where prejudice has tainted the mind, a fair and candid opinion, or advice, mud not be expected. Some people thought even my former courfes too long. Why ? They had been ufed to fee a courfe of Anatomy finidied in thirty or forty ledtures j and therefore imagined that, when it took up near four months, it mud be unne- cedarily minute or prolix. But, let them refledl how im- perfedt fuch courfes were j let them recolledl, that they ne- ver faw the human brain and nerves, nor the human lym- phatic fydem, nor the human gravid uterus and its contents ; let them recolledl, that there were few parts of the body, which they underftood thoroughly, after attending even re- peated courfes of that kind ; and then they will fee that there was great room for improvement } and own that an op- portunity of attending a more compleat courfe of anatomical ledlures, mud be a national advantage. It has been objedled likewife, that a ledlure of two hours continuance, is too much : the attention mud flag, and the memory cannot carry the fubdance of it away. My anfwer to this is, that if there be ufeful bufinefs enough, for two hours a day through the proper feafon, fo much time nearly mud be given up to each ledlure j other- wife a number of material things mud be omitted.- And, there is enough of ufeful matter. Therefore, as I wifh to adapt my labour to the attentive and diligent dudent, for the benefit of the public, the objedlion might pafs without far- ther notice. But, in fadl, a diligent dudent feldom^ tires j ^becaufe [ I0> ] bccaufe the novelty, or variety, or ufefulnefs, is continually fixing his attention ; and he eafily carries off the lubiliance of the whole leflure, becaufe it is not hurried, but given with deliberation ; and he is not fimply hearing a ]e and then we ihall explain the na-« ture of the blood. Em© of THi 'LESTnEgge % • ^ . r PAPERS 4 I PAPERS RELATING TO Dr. hunter’s intended PLAN3 FOR Eftablifliing a MUSEUM in LONDON, FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF ANATOMY, SURGERY, and PHYSIC. J % COPY of a MEMORIAL given to the Earl OF Bute, firft Lord of the Treafury, a Ihort Time before he religned that Office, by Dr. Hunter. S CARCE any fcience or art requires the protedion of a prince more than Anatomy, as well on account of its great ufe to mankind, as becaufe it is perfecuted by the prejudices, both natural and religious, of the multitude in all nations. Its ufefulnefs indeed is generally allowed ^ and yet the de- gree and extent of its benefit is known only to a few. It is the only folid foundation of medicine. It is to the phyfician and furgeon, what geometry is to the aftronomer. It difcovers and afcertains truth ; overturns fuperftition and vulgar error j and checks the enthufiafm of theorifts and of eds in medicine, to whom perhaps more of the human fpecies have fallen a facrifice, than to the fword itfelf, or peftilence. [ ] It is likewife, or at lead might be made of confiderable ufe in fcuipture and painting. A great fchool, provided with all the means of improve- ment, is much more neceffary in this, than in any other branch of knov/ledge, becaufe it is lefs capable of being fludied or improved in private. The difficulties, dangers, and expences, that mufl; be incurred, in procuring dead bo- dies, and in providing proper places for diffedion, and the lecrecy with which the bufinefs muft be conduded, are fuch difcouragements to the ftudy of Anatomy, that few men, even of the profeffion, ever attempt the pradical part : and, without pradice, there can be no great ffiare of real and ufeful knowledge. There can be no effedual fchool for this art, in any other place than a large city j becaufe it requires a great number and a regular fucceffion of bodies, which cannot be procured in fmaller towns. Of the very few who profefs or teach this art in any part of Great-Britain, London excepted,^there are none who can be fupplied with dead bodies for the private ufe of ftudents. They can with difficulty procure only fo many as are abfoiutely neceffary for the public demonftrations of the principal and well known parts of the body. Hence it is that the ffudents never learn the pradical part, and therefore never become Ana- toroifts : and the teachers themfelves can hardly make im- provements, becaufe they cannot have fubjeds for private experi- ments and enquiries. Anatomy t ”9 ] Anatomy was not upon a much better footing even in Lon- don, till the year 1746. From that time, not only more compleat courfes have been regularly given in public, but ftudents have always had opportunities of exercifing them- felves in the pradical part, which, before that period, they could not do, in any part of Great-Britain. This has raifed and diffufed a fpirit for the art, which (if we may be al- lowed to fpeak the truth) will be felt, for fome time, by the Tick, and the lame, in all parts of the Britilh empire. And this has been owing to one, who, with very moderate abi- lities, happened to have an uncommon love for the fludy y and who therefore took uncommon pains,, both to inform, himfelf and to inform others. Hence it is that London has for fome years been one of the beft fchools for Anatomy j and hence the London teacher is become poffefl: of a collediort both of preparations and books, inferior perhaps to none in. Europe.. He wiihes to teach Anatomy to the bed: advantage of his pupils, while, he enjoys life and health ; and to perpetuate the fpirit for Anatomy, in this country, as far as human in- ftitutions can fecure perpetuity. But without fome public and permanent foundation he forefees that Anatomy, and every thing that depends upon, it, muft fink again to its former hate. .It will be taught only by young men, as an introdudion to bufinefs ; the name of ledurer, in nev/s-papers, and in private converfation, never failing to give a man fome degree of credit. But fuch. young teachers will generally be very indifferently qualified, when they begin; and when they have acquired feme abi- lity, from experience, that is,, when they are jufl. become; - HL fit for teacliing, they will generally leave it off. They will always find their labour better rewarded (in the vulgar fenfe of reward) by following the pradlice of phyfic or furgery, than by reading ledlures. So it has been, in faftj and thence, though we have had many profefibrs, or teachers, in this great town, we have not had one Winflow, Morgagni, or Albi- nas : nor can it be expefled, that a Briton flaould be able to do, in a few years, what is done by the labour of a long life in other countries : efpecially too, when we con- fider that there is no provifion made by our government for fupplying him with fubjefts, and that in other countries this article is amply provided for. Above two years ago. Dr. Hunter found himfelf under a neceflity of giving up his ledtures. The fatigue of reading two or three hours every day for fix months, during the winter feafom, when the town is full and bufy, and at fome difiance from his dwelling-houfe j this, with his other en- gagements, which confume a great deal of time, and fre- quently deprive him of natural refi } all this grew to be in- fupportable, and forced him to give notice, that he fiaould read but one courfe more. After that courfe, he was im- portuned fo urgently by his pupils, that he granted them another fiiort one upon the principal parts ; but he read it gratis, thinking, thereby to put an end to all further folicitation. When he took his leave of the fiudents, he received fuch flattering marks of their gratitude, and fuch prefiing calls to continue his ledlures, foi the good of man- kind, that, after very deliberate reflexion, he thought it his duty to do fo, even if he fhould be obliged to drop a part of his more lucrative employments. He conceived that a man may do infinitely more good to the public, by teacoing [ 121 J Bis art, tHan by pradllfing it. The good effefls of the lat- ter miifl: center in the advantage of the few individuals that may be under his cure as patients j but the influence of a teacher extends itfelf to, the whole nation, and. defcends to pofterity. With thefe intentions towards mankind, and with a de- lire of gaining what the bell men have ever efleemed the highefl reward, he begs that the Earl of Bute, who knows well the force of fuch motives, would recommend him to the King’s favour, that he may the better execute his plan of giving lectures during his life, and perpetuate a fucceflion o^ public teachers of Anatomy, under the royal protedlion. What he at prefent wifhes is this ; to be allowed a proper piece of ground, that he may forthwith lay out fix, or even fe> ven thoufand pounds, in^^eredling a building fit for the purpofe, under any condition that may be agreeable to the King. Or, if his Majefty’s known love of the polite arts, and* his benevolence to mankind, Ihould fuggefi: to him a defign of eftablifhing'an academy on a more extenfive plan. Dr. Hunter would be Hill more happy, if what he now propofes for the advancement of one fcience, . might be made a fmall part of an inftitution, worthy of the Britifh nation, and a Britifhs King, B L A N: PLAN of a Theatre, Museum, &c. propofed by Dr. Hunter : With an Account of feveral Parcels of Land in Weftminfter, in his Majefty’s Difpofal, one of which may probably be thought proper for carrying the Doctor’s Scheme into Execu- tion. I T is required to find a convenient piece of ground within his Majefliy’s lands in Weftminfter, large enough for a Dwelling-houfe, a Theatre, and Mufeum, for carrying Dr. Hunter’s plan into execution 3 but there being no petition or memorial from the Dodtor, nor any reference to the Sur- veyor General 3 verbal diredtions were given by Mr. Dyfon, to the Peputy Surveyor, referring him to the Dodtor for the quantity of ground and fituation requifte thereto 3 ac- cordingly the Dodtor delivered a fketch of his delign, whereby it appears, that a piece of ground, of about thirty rod, or of the dimenfions of one hundred and twelve feet in front, by feventy-one feet in depth, is wanted for this ufe. BAILIWICK OF St. JAMES. With regard to his Mijefty’s demifeable land, within the bailiwick of Sl James now laid out in ftreets, and built and C J23 ] and improved at the tenant’s expence, by virtue of leafes under the feal of the Court of Exchequer. Thefe are not to be come at without purchafing in the terms in being ; even old buildings in Duke-Street, Bury-Street, King-Street, or other parts of this extenfive bailywick, will fetch eight or ten years purchafe, and in Pall-Mall, Piccadilly, or St, James’s-Street, near as much more. And when bought in at thofe prices, mud; be pulled down, before they can be of any ferVice in the plan propofed. SCOTLAND-YARD. The ground in both Scotland- Yards, are fo encumbered with the leafes of the Earl of Northumberland, Mr. Ripley, Mr. Edwyn, Mr. Gwyn, Mr. Gibbons, Mr. Killegrew, General Cholmondeley, Mr. Wallace, and others, befides the parts ne- ceffary for his Majefty’s fervice, as the guard-rooms, the office and accommodation of his Majedy’s works, the wood-yard, and other offices, that it does not feem poffible to find one piece of ground there, large enough to anfwer the intended pur- pofe. S't. JAMES’sPARK. St. James’s Park, and the Green Park, are drait enough for the air and accommodations of their Majedies palaces, unlefs a piece of ground of one hundred and twelve feet by feventy-one feet, might be fpared in that corner of the park, joining to Queen’s-Square, by Petty France; which is the mod remote, and lead frequented of any other part of the R parks. [ 124 ] parks. But it is imagined, the Lords Commlffioners of his Majefty’s Treafury, will, with great reafon, objeil to any di- minution of them. SAVOY. In the Savoy is a large front of old houfes on the fouth fide of the Strand, confiding of about thirty houfes, feven of thefe in the broad part of the Strand, may be taken down, which will give a fpace of one hundred and twenty feet by feventy feet, and will fully anfwer the intended ufe. They are now, and for many years pad; have been, held by the inha- bitants, without any title but podedion. 7 his part may be foon cleared of the prefent incroachers, by order of the Court of Ex- chequer, with the confent of the Chancellor of the Duchy, the old buildings pulled down, and the Dodor’s plan carried in- to execution, without the lead; prejudice to the garrifon there, the prifon, the indrmary, the French, or Prudian churches, or any of the public buildings whatfoever, ftanding within the Savoy. And the reddue of thefe old houfes, may be let to fuch tenants as the Lords of the Treafury diall think dt. M E W S, Upper End. At the upper end of the Mews, joining to the houfes in Orange-Street, there may be taken one hundred and forty feet in length, and eighty feet in depth ; this piece of ground at prefent, is part in ruins, on other part are flables be- longing to his Royal Highnefs the Duke of York, and alfo fomc [ 125 ] fome buildings and ground in podeffion of Captain William Hamilton ; and it is very probable, other accommodations might be found for his Royal Highnefs, and Mr. Hamil- ton, in other parts of the Mews, by advice of the Mafter of the Horfe, under whofe jurifdidtion the premifes are. M E W S, Lower End. At the lower end of the MewS, fronting the main Rreet at Charing-Crofs, is a range of ground of about one hun- dred and twelve feet in front, and a fui table depth for the ufe propofcd j it is now ufed, part as a fuller’s and porter’s lodge. Other part, as coach-houfes for the carriages of the King, Queen, and Duke of York ; other part is ufed by the Serjeant Farrier, and the reft is in the occupation of the fervants belonging to Colonel Carpenter, and Captain Ha- milton. Thefe buildings, where fome of the carriages of the Royal Family are put up, are mean old dheds, very unfit for the ufe they are put to; and if other and better accommo- dations might be found for thefe ufes, with the advice of the Mailer of the horfe, to whofe jurifdidion the whole Mews belongs : then this parcel might be applied to Doc- tor Hunter’s propofal, being well fituate for that purpofe. It is ne'celTary, the Lords of the Treafury Ihould be informed, that a plan was formerly made for rebuilding the Mews ; which was no farther carried into execution, than building the royal liable in the middle of the Mews. If this defign ftill exills, this plan of Dr. Hunter’s would break in up- on it. R HYDE- [ 126 ] HYDE-PARK. Juft within the gate leading into Hyde-Park, between the faid Gate and the Water Conduit, may be fpared a piece of ground, lying between the Park Road to Kenlington, and the fouth eaft wall of the Park, large enough for Doc- tor Hunter’s plan. The way to it may be along the com- mon road to Kenfington, juft beyond the Turnpike Gate, and the fituation will be airy, if placed over againft jthe end of the road leading to Weftminfter. The houfes of the Lords, Holdernefs, Cholmondeley, and March, &c. are all remote two or three hundred yards from this piece of ground,. Surveyor-General’s Office,. January i 6 , 176-fj. This r 127 ] This was given to the KING by Mr. Hawkins^ D r. hunter has given^ia a memorial to Lord Bute, which his Lord£hip recommended to Mr. Gren- ville, fetting forth the ufefulnefs of Anatomy ; and that it is an art which cannot be cultivated in private; and there- fore requires a public fchool with every advantage, and has a peculiar claim to the protedlion of the Crown ; that Lon- don is the only place for fuch a fchool, becaufe a fufficient number of dead bodies cannot be procured in any other part of Great-Britain ; that he had improved and extended the ftudy of Anatomy, and fupported it for many years ; that he forefaw it would be in danger of linking again if there was not fome fixed foundation ; that therefore, though he had once taken a refolution of giving up his lectures,, he not only had refumed them again, but was now come to a refolution of continuing them for his life, and of per- petuating ufcful ledlures of Anatomy in this place* This he is determined to do in the beft manner he is able. His heartinefs in the caufe, his very large colledlion ©f preparations and books, his experience, and induftry, can hardly fail of fuccefs : and he thinks, for many reafons, this national, and difinterefted fcheme, may be executed with much greater advantage in his life - time, than after his death. He [ 128 ] He is ready to lay out fix or even feven thoufand pounds immediately, but cannot expend more, (at leaft now) with- out rilking his peace of mind. He flatters himfelf if the King knew of a fcheme fo ufe- ful, and fo perfedly difinterefted, that he would honour it with his name and protedion, and give a convenient piece of ground for the building. There are now two old houfes in Scotland-Yard, which the proprietor has begun to repair for the twenty-five re- maining years of his leafe. He afles one thoufand pounds for them. Thefe, with a row of little houfes belonging to the fcullery, would anfwer the purpofe for fituation and fpace ; and if it fliould be wanted, the next houfe (which is old) may be purchafed for fix hundred pounds. If any delay be made, that piece of ground will be lofi: j at leaft, the price will rife daily, becaufe the repairs are now ' begun. To [ 129 ] To the Right Hon. George G RE N VI LLEr S I R, I M O S T fincerely repent having given you fo much trouble about a piece of ground to build upon. The fcheme I propofed was for the public : I offered to lay out feven thoufand pounds from my own pocket, and intended giving my mufeum and labour : but, what I did not expedt, I have been obliged to give up a good deal of time, (which is more precious to me than any thing) in waiting, and hitherto to no purpofe. I had a meffage from the Surveyor, above hvc months ago, and when I waited upon him, I told him, that it was unexpected to me ; that from the delay, and apparent negledt, for fome months, I had confidered the propofal as in effedt refufed j but faid, I was flill ready to execute my part. I then expedted fomething was to be done immediately, but heard nothing more for about two months, and then Mr. Wheatly fent for me. I complained to him of the delay, but faid I was ftill ready to do my part, if you would pleafe to do yours, and infifted if any thing was to be done, that it might be done immediately. He talked of a few days being neceffary j and I told him^ that a few days would make no dilference at all, but that my piefent fituation would not admit of waiting months^ Yefteiday, nearly three months were elapfed from that time, without my hearing any thing of the matter, and I thought ‘ it \ [ 130 ]| V / - if " it at laft time to ^ wait at the Trekfury, and tp finif^ the bufinefs one way or other. Accordingly, I found that no- thing was done^: and t^ierefore nothing remains ibr me, but to beg pardon for giving fo much trouble, and to beg that I may no longer be ,confidered as bound in honour to ful- fil my part of the propofal. However, as this is the laft time that I will -give' you any trouble about this affair, to cut off all fufpicion of my having made a fham propofal, I will take the liberty to fay, that if any order be given for the ground, before the firf day of February next, I fhall be ready to go on with the plan : otherwife, I am fo circum- ftanced that I never ccmf and never will, \ 1 •> I am, &c. W. H. F J N I S. ,;^’.^i7-^';y.'‘^i^’■V' : • .»,,Awt’,v ■'•■V,’'-' .. ' < :wsm '■^<..^':''^s > .)k- ,..i' ’■ ^ N- ' M-?■--^ - Vi-'*'-', , " ‘■e . . ■. ~Mt ' j:: : 5 »ffl' If |te"; :f f' . ■ ^, , . ‘'i' "Viv/, >( ‘ ' ' V y f ‘••^' mmi^sMim I ' y Hunter 1784