DUKE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Gilbert T. Rowe Collection MARCUS AURELIUS' ANTONINUS THE MEDITATIONS OF THE EMPEROR MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. TRANSLATED BY GEORGE LONG, M.A. WITH A BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH AND A VIEW OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF ANTONINUS BY THE TRANSLATOR. NEW YORK; A. L. BUKT, PUBLISHER. ■? Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 \ ?V\'. •' https://archive.org/details/meditationsofemp01marc CONTENTS Page. Biographical Sketch of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus 1 The Philosophy of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus 31 Marcus Aurelius, from “Seekers After God.” ... 7B The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus 131 Index 299 I BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Marcus Aurelius Antoninus. BY THE TEANSLATOK. LIFE OF Marcus Aurelius Antoninus. Marcus Antoninus was born at Eome a. d. 121, on the 26th of April. His father, Annins Yerus, died while he was prsetor. His mother was Domitia Cal- villa, also named Liicilla. The Emperor Titus Antoninus Pius married Annia Galeria Faustina, the sister of Annius Yerus, and was consequently the uncle of Marcus Antoninus. When Hadrian adopted Antoninus Pius and declared him his successor in the empire, Antoninus Pius adopted both Lucius Ceionius Commodus, the son of Aelius Cffisar, and Marcus Antoninus, whose original name was Marcus Annius Yerus. Antoninus then took the name of Marcus Aelius Aurelias Yerus, to which was added the title of Caesar in a. d. 139 ; the name Aelius belonged to Hadrian’s family, and Aurelius was the name of Antoninus Pius. When Marcus An- toninus became Augustus, he dropped the name of Yerus and took the name of Antoninus. Accordingly he is generally named Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, or simply Marcus Antoninus. The youth was most carefully brought up. He thanks the gods (i. 17) that he had good grandfathers, good parents, a good sister, good teachers, good associates, good kinsmen and friends, nearly everything good. 2 BIOGRAPHICAL 8HETCH OF He had the happy fortune to witness the example of his uncle and adoptive father Antoninus Pius, and he has recorded in his work (i. 16; vi. 30) the virtues of this excellent man and prudent ruler. Like many young Romans he tried his hand at poetry and studied rhetoric. Ilerodes Atticus and M. Cornelius Pronto were his teachers in eloquence. There are extant let- ters between Pronto and Marcus,* which show the great affection of the pupil for the master, and the master’s great hopes of his industrious pupil. Marcus Antoninus mentions Pronto (i. 11) among those to whom he was indebted for his education. When he was eleven years old, he assumed the dress of philosophers, something plain and coarse, became a hard student, and lived a most laborious, abstemious life, even so far as to injure his health. Pinally he abandoned poetry and rhetoric for philosophy, and he attached himself to the sect of the Stoics. But he did not neglect the study of law, which was a useful prep- aration for the high place which he was designed to fill. His teacher was L. Volusianus Mmcianus, a dis- tinguished jurist. We must suppose that he learned the Roman discipline of arms, which was a necessary part of the education of a man who afterward led his troops to battle against a warlike race. Antoninus has recorded in his first book the names of his teachers and the obligations which he owed to each of them. The way in which he speaks of what he learned from them might seem to savor of vanity or self-praise, if we look carelessly at the way in which he has expressed himself; but if anyone draws this * M. Cornelii Fronionis Reliqiiise, Berlin, 1816. Tliere are a few letters between Fronto and Antoninus Pius. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 3 conclusion, he will be mistaken. Antoninus means to commemorate the merits of his several teachers, what they taught and what a pupil might learn from them. Besides, this book like the eleven other books was for his own use, and if we may trust the note at the end of the first book, it was written during one of Marcus Antoninus’ campaigns against the Quadi, at a time when the commemoration of the virtues of his illustri- ous teachers might remind him of their lessons and the practical uses which he might derive from them. Among his teachers of philosophy was Sextus of CliEeroneia, a grandson of Plutarch. "What he learned from this excellent man is told by himself (i. 9). His favorite teacher was Q. Junius Rusticus (i. 7), a philos- opher, and also a man of practical good sense in public affairs. Rusticus was the adviser of Antoninus after he became emperor. Young men who are destined for high places are not often fortunate in those who are about them, their companions and teachers ; and I do not know any example of a young prince having had an education which can be compared with that of Marcus Antoninus. Such a body of teachers distin- guished by their acquirements and their character will hardly be collected again ; and as to the pupil, we have not had one like him since. Hadrian died in July a. d. 138, and was succeeded by Antoninus Pius. Marcus Antoninus married Faustina, his cousin, the daughter of Pius, probably about A. D. 146, for he had a daughter born in 147. He received from his adoptive father the title of Cmsar and was associated with him in the administration of the state. The father and the adopted son lived together in perfect friendship and confidence. Anto- i BIOGBAPHICAL SKETCH OF ninus was a dutiful son, and the emperor Pius loved and esteemed him, Antoninus Pius died in March a. d. 161. The Senate, it is said, urged Marcus Antoninus to take the sole administration of the empire, but he associated with himself the other adopted son of Pius, L. Ceionius Commodus, who is generally called L. Yerus. Thus Pome for the first time had two emperors. Yerus was an indolent man of pleasure and unworthy of his station. Antoninus, however, bore with him, and it is said that Yerus had sense enough to pay to his col- league the respect due to his character. A virtuous emperor and a loose partner lived together in peace, and their alliance was strengthened by Antoninus giving to Yerus for wife his daughter Lucilla. The reign of Antoninus was first troubled by a Parthian war, in which Yerus was sent to command, but he did nothing, and the success that was obtained by the Romans in Armenia and on the Euphrates and Tigris was due to his generals. This Parthian war ended in a. d. 165. Aurelius and Yerus had a triumph (a. d. 166) for the victories in the east. A pestilence followed which carried off great numbers in Rome and Italy, and spread to the west of Europe. The north of Italy was also threatened by the rude people beyond the Alps from the borders of Gallia to the eastern side of the Hadriatic, These barbarians attempted to break into Italy, as the Germanic nations had attempted near three hundred years before ; and the rest of the life of Antoninus, with some intervals, Avas employed in driving back the invaders. In 169 Yerus suddenly died, and Antoninus administered the state alone, MARCUS A URELIU8 ANTONINUS. 5 During the German wars Antoninus resided for three years on the Danube at Carnuntum. The Marcomanni were driven out of Pannonia and almost destroyed in their retreat across the Danube; and in a. d. 17d the emperor gained a great victory over the Quadi. In A. D. 175 Avidius Cassius, a brave and skillful Eoman commander who was at the head of the troops in Asia, revolted and declared himself Augustus. But Cassius was assassinated by some of his officers, and so the rebellion came to an end. Antoninus showed his humanity by his treatment of the family and the par- tisans of Cassius, and his letter to the Senate in which he recommends mercy is extant. (Yulcatius, Avidius Cassius, c. 12.) Antoninus set out for the east on hearing of Cassius’ revolt. Though he appears to have returned to Rome in A. D. 171, he went back to prosecute the war against the Germans, and it is probable that he marched direct to the east from the German war. His wife Faustina, who accompanied him into Asia, died sud- denly at the foot of the Taurus, to the^ great grief of her husband. Capitolinus, who has written the life of Antoninus, and also Dion Cassius accuse the empress of scandalous infidelity to her husband and of abom- inable lewdness. But Capitolinus says that Antoninus either knew it not or pretended not to know it. Noth- ing is so common as such malicious reports in all ages, and the history of imperial Rome is full of them. Antoninus loved his wife, and he says that she was “ obedient, affectionate and simple.” The same scan- dal had been spread about Faustina’s mother, the wife of Antoninus Pius, and yet he too was perfectly satis- fied with his wife. Antoninus Pius says, after her c BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF death, in a letter to Fronto, that he would rather have lived in exile with his wife than in his palace at Rome Avithout her. There are not many men who would give their wives a better character than these two emperors. Capitolinus wrote in the time of Diocletian. He may have intended to tell the truth, but he is a jioor, feeble biographer. Don Cassius, the most malig- nant of historians, always reports, and perhaps he believed, any scandal against anybody. Antoninus continued his journey to Syria and Egypt, and on his return to Italy through Athens he Avas initiated into the Eleusinian mysteries. It was the practice of the emperor to conform to the established rites of the age and to perform religious ceremonies AAdth due solemnity. We cannot conclude from this that he Avas a superstitious man, though Ave might per- haps do so, if his book did not shoAV that he Avas not. But this is only one among many instances that a ruler’s public acts do not always prove his real opinions. A prudent governor Avill not roughly oppose even the superstitions of his people, and though he may Avish that they were Aviser, he Avill knoAV that he can- not make them so by offending their prejudices. Antoninus and his son Commodus entered Rome in triumph, perhaps for some German victories, on the 23d of December, a. d. 176. In the folloAving year Commodus Avas associated Avith his father in the empire and took the name of Augustus. This year A. D. 177 is memorable in ecclesiastical history. Attains and others Avere put to death at Lyon for their adher- ence to the Christian religion. The evidence of this persecution is a letter preserved by Eusebius (E. H. v. 1; printed in Routh’s Rehquiae Sacrse, vol. i. Avith notes.) MARCUS A URBLIUS ANTONINUS. 1 The letter is from the Christians of Vienna and Lugdunum in Gallia (Vienne and Lyon) to their Chris- tian brethren in Asia and Phrygia ; and it is preserved perhaps nearly entire. It contains a Very particular description of the tortures inflicted on the Christians in Gallia, and it states that while the persecution was going on, Attains a Christian and a Poinan citizen was loudly demanded by the populace and brought into the amjDhitheater, but the governor ordered him to be reserved with the rest who were in prison, until he had received instructions from the emperor. Many had been tortured before the governor thought of applying to Antoninus. The imperial rescript, says the letter, was that the Christians should be punished, but if they would deny their faith, they must be re- leased. On this the work began again. The Christians who were Roman citizens were beheaded : the rest were exposed to the wild beasts in the amphitheater. Some modern writers on ecclesiastical history, when they use this letter, say nothing of the wonderful stories of the martyrs’ sufferings. Sanctus, as the letter says, was burned with plates of hot iron till his body was one sore and had lost all human form, but on being put to the rack he recovered his former appearance under the torture, which was thus a cure instead of a punishment. He 'was afterward torn by beasts, and placed on an iron chair and roasted. He died at last. The letter is one piece of evidence. The writer, who- ever he was that wrote in the name of the Gallic Christians, is our evidence both for the ordinary and the extraordinary circumstances of the story, and we cannot accept his evidence for one part and reject the 8 biographical sketch ok other. We often receive small evidence as a proof of a thing which we believe to be within the limits of probability or possibility, and we reject exactly the same evidence, when the thing to which it refers, appears very improbable or impossible. But this is a false method of inquiry, though it is followed by some modern writers, who select what they like from a story and reject the rest of the evidence ; or if they do not reject it, they dishonestly suppress it. A man can only act consistently by accepting all this letter or re- jecting it all, and we cannot blame him for either. But he who rejects it may still admit that such a letter may be founded on real facts ; and he would make this admission as the most probable way of accounting for the existence of the letter : but if, as he would sup- pose, the writer has stated some things falsely, he can- not tell what part of his story is worthy of credit. The war on the northern frontier appears to have been uninterrupted during the visit of Antoninus to the East, and on his return the emperor again left Rome to oppose the barbarians. The Germanic people were defeated in a great battle a. d. 179. During this ca mpaign the emperor was seized with some contagious malady, of which he died in the camp at Sirmium (Mitrovitz) on the Save in Lower Pannonia, but at Vindebona (Vienna) according to other authorities, on the 17th of March a. d. 180, in the fifty -ninth year of his age. His son Commodus was with him. The body or the ashes probably of the emperor were carried to Rome, and 'the received the honor of deification. Those who c pld afford it had his statue or bust, and when Capitc/inus wrote, many people still had statues of Antoninus among the Dei Penates or household MARGTTS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 9 deities. He was in a manner made a saint. Com' modus erected to the memory of his father the An- tonine column which is now in the Piazza Colonna at Home. The bassi rilievi which are placed in a spiral line round the shaft commemorate the victories of Antoninus over the IVIarcomanni and the Quadi, and the miraculous shower of rain which refreshed the Eoman soldiers and discomfited their enemies. The statue of Antoninus was placed on the capital of the column, but it was removed at some time unknown, and a bronze statue of St. Paul was put in the place by Pope Sixtus the fifth. The historical evidence for the times of Antoninus is very defective, and some of that which remains is not credible. The most curious is the story about the miracle which happened in a. d. 174 during the war with the Quadi. The Roman army was in danger of perishing by thirst, but a sudden storm drenched them with rain, while it discharged fire and hail on their enemies, and the Romans gained a great victory. All the authorities which speak of the battle speak also of the miracle. The Gentile writers assign it to their gods, and the Christians to the intercession of the Christian legion in the emperor’s army. To confirm the Christian statement it is added that the emperor gave the title of Thundering to this legion ; but Dacier and others, who maintain the Christian report of the miracle, admit that this title of Thundering or Light- ning was not given to this legion because the Quadi were struck with lightning, but because there was a figure of lightning on their shields, and that this title of the legion existed in the time of Augustus. Scaliger also had observed that the legion was called 10 BIOORAPBIGAL SKETCH OP Thundering before the reign of Antoninus. We learn this from Dion Cassius (Lib. 55, c. 23, and the note of Reimarus) who enumerates all the legions of Augustus’ time. The name Thundering or Lightning also occurs on an inscription of the reign of Trajan, which was found at Trieste. Eusebius (v. 5) when he relates the miracle, quotes Apolinarius, bishop of ILierapolis, as authority for this name being given to the legion Meli- tene by the emperor in consequence of the success which he obtained through their prayers ; from which we may estimate the value of Apolinarius’ testimony. Eusebius does not say in what book of Apolinarius the statement occurs. Dion says that the Thundeiing legion was stationed in Cappadocia in the time of Augustus. Yalesius also observes that in the Notitia of the Imperium Romanum there is mentioned under the commander of Armenia the Praefectura of the twelfth legion named “Thundering Melitene;” and this position in Armenia will agree with what Dion says of its position in Cappadocia. Accordingly Yalesius concludes that Melitene was not the name of the legion, but of the town in which it was stationed. Melitene was also the name of the district in which this town was situated. The legions did not, he says, take their name from tlie place where they were on duty, but from the country in which they were raised, and therefore, what Eusebius says about the Melitene does not seem probable to him. Yet Yalesius, on the authority of Apolinarius and Tertullian, believed that the miracle was worked through the prayers of the Christian sol- diers in the emperor’s army. Rufinus does not give the name of Melitene to this legion, says Yalesius, and probably he purposely omitted it, because he knew MARCUS A URELIU8 ANTONINUS. 11 that Melitene was the name of a town in Armenia Minor, where the legion was stationed in his time. The emperor, it is said, made a report of his victory to the Senate, which we may believe, for such was the practice; but we do not know what he said in his letter, for it is not extant. Dacier assumes that the emperor’s letter was purposely destroyed by the Senate, or the enemies of Christianity, that so honorable a tes- timony to the Christians and their religion might not be perpetuated. The critic has, however, not seen that he contradicts himself when he tells us the purport of the letter, for he says that it was destroyed, and even Eusebius could not find it. But there does exist a letter in Greek addressed by Antoninus to the Roman people and the sacred Senate after this memorable victory. It is sometimes printed after Justin’s first Apology, but it is totally unconnected with the apologies. This letter is one of the most stupid forgeries of the many which exist, and it can- not be possibly founded even on the genuine report of Antoninus to the Senate. If it were genuine it would free the emperor from the chai’ge of persecuting men because they were Christians, tor he says in this false letter that if a man accuse another only of being a Christian and the accused confess and there is nothing else against him, he must be set free ; with this mon- strous addition, made by a man inconceivably igno- rant, that the informer must be burned alive.* * Eusebius (v. 5) quotes Tertullian’s Apology to tbe Roman Senate in confirmation of the story. Tertuilian, he says, writes that letters of the emperor were extant, in which he declares that his army was saved by the prayers of the Christians ; and that he “threatened to punish with death those who ventured to accuse us.” 12 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF During the time of Antoninus Pius and Marcus Antoninus there appeared tlie first Apology of Jus- tinus, and under Antoninus the Oration of Tatian against the Greeks, which was a fierce attack on the established religions ; the address of Athenagoras to Marcus Antoninus on behalf of the Christians, and the Apology of Melito, bishop of Sardes, also addressed to the enij^eror, and that of Apolinarius. The first Apology of Justinus is addressed to Titus Antoninus Pius and his two adopted sons Marcus Antoninus and L. Yerus; but we do not know whether they read it.* * The second Apology of Justinus is entitled “to the Poman Senate but this superscription is from some cop 3 ’ist. In the first chapter Justinus addresses the Romans. In the second chapter he speaks of an affair that had recently happened in the time of Marcus Antoninus and L. Yerus, as it seems; and he also directl}'' addresses the emperor, saying of a certain woman, “ she addressed a petition to thee the emperor, and thou didst grant the petitition.” In other passages the writer addresses the two emperors, from which we must conclude that the Apology was directed to them. Eusebius (E. II. iv. 18) states that the second Apology was addressed to the successor of Antoninus Pius, and he names him Antoninus Yerus, meaning Marcus Antoninus. In one passage of this second Apology It is possible that tbe forged letter which is now extant may he one of those which Tertullian had seen, for he uses the plural number “letters.” A great deal has been written about this miracle of the Thundering Legion, and more than is worth reading. There is a dissertation on this supposed miracle in Moyle’s Works, London, 1726. * Orosius (vii. 14) says that Justinus the philosopher pre.sented to Antoninus Pius his work in defence of the Christian religion, and made him merciful to the Christians. MARCUS A UBELIUS AMTOMINUS. 13 (c. 8), Justinus, or the writer, whoever he may be, says that even men who followed the Stoic doctrines, when they ordered their lives according to ethical reason, were hated and murdered, such as Heraclitus, Muso- nius in his own times and others ; for all those who in any way labored to live according to reason and avoided wickedness were always hated ; and this was the effect of the work of demons. Justinus himself is said to have been put to death at Home, because he refused to sacrifice to the gods. It cannot have been in the reign of Hadrian, as one authority states ; nor in the time of Antoninus Pius, if the second Apology was written in the time of Marcus Antoninus ; and there is evidence that this event took iJace under Marcus Antoninus and L. Yerus, when Rusticus was prefect of the city.* * See the Martyrium Sanctorum Justini, etc., in the works of Justinus, ed. Otto, vol. ii. 559. “Junius Rusticus Prefectus Urbi erat sub imperatoribus M. Aurelio et L. Vero, id quod liquet ex Themistii Orat. xxxiv. Dindorf. p. 451, et ex quodam illorum re- scripto. Dig. 49. 1. 1, § 2.” (Otto.) The rescript contains the words “Junium Rusticum amicum nostrum Prefectum Urbi.” The Mar- tyrium of Justinus and others is written in Greek. It begins: “In the time of the wicked defenders of idolatry impious edicts were pub- lished against the pious Christians, both in cities and country places, for the purpose of compelling them to make offerings to vain idols. Accordingly the holy men (Justinus, Chariton, a woman Charito, Paeon, Liberianus and others) were brought before Rusticus, the pre- fect of Rome.” The Martyrium gives the examination of the accused by Rusticus. All of them professed to be Christians. Justinus was asked if he ex- pected to ascend into heaven and to receive a reward for his suffer- ings if he was condemned to death. He answered that he did not expect: he was certain of it. Finally, the test of obedience was pro- posed to the prisoners: they were required to sacrifice to the gods. All refused, and Rusticus pronounced the sentence, which was that 14 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OK The persecution in which Polycarp suffered at Smyrna belongs to the time of Marcus Antoninus. The evidence for it is the letter of the church of Smyrna to the churches of Philomelium and the other Christian churches, and it is preserved by Eusebius (E. II. iv. 15). But the critics do not agree about the time of Polycarp’s death, differing in the two extremes to the amount of twelve years. The circumstances of Polycarp’s martyrdom were accompanied by miracles, one of which Eusebius (iv. 15) has omitted, but it ap- pears in the oldest Latin version of the letter, which Usher published, and it is supposed that this version was made not long after the time of Eusebius. The notice at the end of the letter states that it was tran- scribed by Caius from the copy of Ireneeus, the disciple of Poly carp, then transcribed by Socrates at Corinth ; “after which I Pionius again wrote it out from the copy above mentioned, having searched it out by the revelation of Polycarp, Avho directed me to it, etc.” The story of Polycai'p’s martyrdom is embellished with miraculous circumstances which some modern Avriters on ecclesiastical history take the liberty of omitting.* * those who refused to sacrifice to the gods and obey the emperor’s order should be whipped and beheaded according to the law. The martyrs were then led to the usual place of execution and beheaded. Some of the faithful secretly carried ofE the bodies and deposited them in a fit place. * Conyers Middleton, An Inquiry into the Miraculous Powers, etc., p. 126 Middleton says that Eusebius omitted to mention the dove, which flew out of Polycarp’s body, and Dodwell and Archbishop Wake have done the same. Wake says, “ I am so little a friend to such miracles that I thought it better with Eusebius to omit that cir- cumstance than to mention it from Bp. Usher’s Manuscript,” which MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 15 In order to form a proper notion of the condition of the Christians under Marcus Antoninus we must go back to Trajan’s time. When the younger Pliny was governor of Bithynia, the Christians were numerous in those parts, and the worshipers of the old religion were falling off. The temples were deserted, the fes- tivals neglected, and there were no purchasers of vic- tims for sacrifice. Those who were interested in the maintenance of the old religion thus found that their profits were in danger. Christians of both sexes and of all ages were brought before the governor, who did not know what to do with them. He could come to no other conclusion than this, that those who confessed to be Christians and persevered in their religion ought to be punished ; if for nothing else, for their invincible obstinac}'^. He found no crimes proved against the Christians, and he could only characterize their religion as a depraved and extravagant superstition, which might be stopped, if the people were allovred the op- portunity of recanting. Pliny wrote this in a letter to Trajan (Plinius, Ep. x. 97). He asked for the emperor’s directions, because he did not know what to do: He remarks that he had never been engaged in judicial inquiries about the Christians, and that accordingly he did not know what to inquire about or how far to in- quire and punish. This proves that it was not a new thing to examine into a man’s profession of Christianity and to punish him for it.* * Trajan’s Rescript is extant. manuscript, however, says Middleton, he afterward declares to be so well attested that we need not any further assurance of the truth of it. *Orosius(vii. 12) speaks of Trajan’s persecution of the Christians, and of Pliny’s application to him having led the emperor to mitigate 16 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF lie approved of the governor’s judgment in the mat- ter; hut he said that no search must be made after the Christians; if a man was charged with the new religion and convicted, he must not he punished if he affirmed that he was not a Christian and confirmed his denial by showing his reverence to the heathen gods. He added that no notice must be taken of anonymous in- formations, for such things were of bad example. Tra- jan was a mild and sensible man, and both motives of mercy and policy probably also induced him to take as little notice of the Christians as he could ; to let them live in quiet, if it were possible. Trajan’s Rescript is the first legislative act of the head of the Roman state Avith reference to Christianity which is known to us. It does not appear that the Christians were further disturbed under his reign. The martyrdom of Igna- tius by the order of Trajan himself is not universally admitted to be an historical fact.* * In the time of Hadrian it was no longer possible for the Roman government to overlook the great increase of the Christians and the hostility of the common sort to them. If the governors in the provinces were will- ing to let them alone, they could not resist the fanati- cism of the heathen communit}^ who looked on the Christians as atheists. The Jews too who were settled all over the Roman Empire were as hostile to the liis severity. The punishment by the Mosaic law for those who at- tempted to seduce the Jews to follow new gods was death. If a man was secretly enticed to such new worship he must kill the seducer, even if the seducer were brother, son, daughter, wife or friend. (Deut. xiii.) * The Martyrium Ignatii, first published in Latin by Archbishop Usher, is the chief evidence for the circumstances of Ignatius’ death. MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 17 Christians as the Gentiles were.* With the time of Hadrian begin the Christian Apologies, which show plainly what the popular feeling toward the Christians then was. A rescript of Hadrian to JVIinucius Fundanus, the Proconsul of Asia, which stands at the end of Jus- tin’s first Apology,:}; instructs the governor that inno- cent people must not be troubled and false accusers must not be allowed to extort money from them ; the charges against the Christians must be made in due form and no attention must be paid to popular clamors ; when Christians were regularly prosecuted and convicted of illegal acts, they must be punished according to their deserts; and false accusers also must be punished. Antoninus Pius is said to have published Eescripts to the same effect. The terms of Hadrian’s Rescript seem very favorable to the Christians ; but if we understand it in this sense, that they were only to be punished like other people for illegal acts, it would have had no meaning, for that could have been done without asking the emperor’s advice. The real purpose of the Rescript is that Christians must be punished if they persisted in their belief, and would not prove their renunciation *We have the evidence of Jnstinus (ad Diognetum, c. 5) to this effect: “The Christians are attacked by the Jews as if they were men of a different race and are persecuted by the Greeks; and those who hate them cannot give the reason of their enmity.” t And in Eusebius, E. H. iv. 8, 9. Orosius (vii. 13) says that Hadrian sent this rescript to Minucius Fundanus, Proconsul of Asia, after being instructed in books written on the Christian religion by Quadratus, a disciple of the Apostles, and Aristides, an Athenian, an honest and wise man, and Serenus Granins. In the Greek text of Hadrian’s rescript there is mentioned Serenius Granianus, the pre- decessor of Minucius Fundanus in the government of Asia. This rescript of Hadrian has clearly been added to the Apology by some editor. 18 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF of it by acknowledging the heathen religion. This was Trajan’s rule, and we have no reason for suppos- ing that Hadrian granted more to the Christians than Trajan did. There is also printed at the end of Justin’s first Apology a rescript of Antoninus Pius to the commune of Asia, and it is also in Eusebius (E. H. iv. 13). The date of the Pescript is the third consul- ship of Antoninus Pius.* The Eescript declares that the Christians, for they are meant, though the name Christians does not occur in the Rescript, were not to be disturbed, uidess they were attemj)ting something against the Roman rule, and no man was to be pun- ished simply for being a Christian. But this Rescript is spurious. Any man moderately acquainted with Roman history will see by the style and tenor that it is a clumsy forgery. * Eusebius (E. H. iv. 12) after giving the beginning of Justinus’ First Apology, which contains the address to T. Antoninus and his two adopted sons, adds ‘ ‘ the same emperor being addressed by other brethren in Asia honored the Commune of Asia with the following Rescript.” This Rescript, which is in the next chapter of Eusebius (E. H. iv. 13), is in the sole name of Caesar Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus Armenius, though Eusebius had just before said that he was going to give us a Rescript of Antoninus Pius. There are some material variations between the two copies of the Rescript besides the difference in the title, which difference makes it impossible to say whether the forger intended to assign this Rescript to Pius or to Marcus Antoninus. The author of the Alexandrine Chronicum says that Marcus being moved by the entreaties of 'Melito and other heads of the church wrote an Epistle to the Commune of Asia in which he forbade the Christians to be troubled on account of their religion. Valesius sup)poses this to be the letter or Rescript which is contained in Euse- bius (iv. 13), and to be the answer to the Apology of Melito, of which 1 shall soon give the substance. But Marcus certainly did not write this letter which is in Eusebius, and wo know not what answer he made to Melito, MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 19 In the time of Marcus Antoninus the opposition be- tween the old and the new belief was still stronger, and the adherents of the heathen religion urged those in authority to a more regular resistance to the invasion? of the Christian faith. Melito, in his apology to Mar- cus Antoninus, represents the Christians of Asia as persecuted under new imperial orders. Shameless informers, he says, men who were greedy after the property of others, used these orders as a means of robbing those who were doing no harm. He doubts if a just emperor could have ordered anything so unjust ; and if the last order was really not from the emperor, the Christians entreat him not to give them up to their enemies.* We conclude from this that there were at * Eusebius, iv. 26 ; and Routb’s Reliquiae Sacrae, vol. i. and the notes. The interpretation of this fragment is not easy. Mosheim misunderstood one passage so far as to affirm that Marcus promised rewards to those who denounced the Christians ; an interpretation which is entirely false. Melito calls the Christian religion “ our philosophy,” which began among barbarians (the Jews), and flour- ished among the Roman subjects in t(ie time of Augustus, to the great advantage of the empire, for from that time the power of the Romans grew great and glorious. He says that the emperor has and will have as the successor to Augustus’ power the good wishes of men, if he will protect that philosophy which grew up with the empire and began with Augustus, which philosophy the predeces- sors of Antoninus honored in addition to the other religions. He further says that the Christian religion had suffered no harm since the time of Augustus, but on the contrary had enjoyed all honor and respect that any man could desire. Nero and Domitian, he says, were alone persuaded by some malicious men to calumniate the Christian religion, and this was the origin of the false charges against the Christians. But this was corrected by the emperors who immediately preceded Antoninus, who often by their Rescripts reproved those w'ho attempted to trouble the Christians. Hadrian, Antoninus’ grandfather, wrote to many, and among them to Fun- danus, the governor of Asia. Antoninus Pius, when Marcus was 20 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF least Imperial Rescripts or Constitutions of Marcus Antoninus, which were made the foundation of these persecutions. The fact of being a Christian was now a crime and punished, unless the accused denied their religion. Then come the persecutions at Smyrna, which some modern critics place in a. d. 167, ten years before the persecution of Lyon. The governors of the prov- inces under Marcus Antoninus might have found enough even in Trajan’s Rescript to warrant them in punishing Christians, and the fanaticism of the people would drive them to persecution, even if they were unwilling. But besides the fact of the Christians rejecting all the heathen ceremonies, we must not for- get that they plainly maintained that all the heathen religions were false. The Christians thus declared war against the heathen rites, and it is hardly necessary to observe that this was a declaration of hostility against the Roman government, which tolerated all the various forms of superstition that existed in the empire, and could not consistently tolerate another religion, which associated with him in the empire, wrote to the cities, that they must not trouble the Christians ; among others to the people of Larissa, Thessalonica, the Athenians and all the Greeks. Melito concluded thus: We are persuaded that thou who hast about these things the same mind that they had, nay, rather one much more humane and phi- losophical, wilt do all that we ask thee. This apology was written after A. d. 169, the year in which Verus died, for it .speaks of Marcus only and his son Commodus. According to Melito’s testimony, Christians had only been punished for their religion in the time of Nero and Domitian, and the persecutions began again in the time of Marcus Antoninus, and were founded on his orders, which were abused, as he seems to mean. He distinctly affirms “ that the race of the godly is now persecuted and harassed by fresh imperial orders in Asia, a thing which had never happened before.” But we know that all this is not true, and that Christians had been punished in Trajan’s time. MARCUS A UBELIUS ANTONINUS. 21 declared that all the rest were false, and all the splen- did ceremonies of the empire only a worship of devils. If we had a true ecclesiastical history, we should know how the Roman emperors attempted to check the new religion, how they enforced their principle of finally punishing Christians, simply as Christians, which Justin in his Apology affirms that they did, and I have no doubt that he tells the truth ; how far popular clamor and riots went in this matter, and how far many fanatical and ignorant Christians, for there were many such, contributed to excite the fanaticism on the other side, and to embitter the quarrel between the Roman government and the new religion. Our extant ecclesiastical histories are manifestly falsified, and what truth they contain is grossly exaggerated ; but the fact is certain that in the time of Marcus Antoninus the heathen populations were in open hostility to the Christians, and that under Antoninus’ rule men were put to death because they were Christians. Eusebius, in the preface to his fifth book, remarks that in the seventeenth year of Antoninus’ reign, in some parts of the world the persecution of the Christians became more violent, and that it pro- ceeded from the populace in the cities ; and he adds in his usual style of exaggeration, that we may infer from what took place in a single nation that myriads of martjws were made in the habitable earth. The nation which he alludes to is Gallia ; and he then pro- ceeds to give the letter of the churches of Vienna and Lugdunum. It is probable that he has assigned the true cause of the persecutions, the fanaticism of the populace, and that both governors and emperor had a great deal of trouble with these disturbances, How 22 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF far Marcus was cognizant of these cruel proceedings we tlo not know, for the historical records of his reign are very defective. He did not make the rule against the Christians, for Trajan did that ; and if we admit that he would have been willing to let the Christians alone, we cannot affirm that it was in his power, for it would be a great mistake to suppose that Antoninus had the unlimited authority, which some modern sovereigns have had. Ilis power was limited by certain constitutional forms, by the Senate, and by the prece- dents of his predecessors. We cannot admit that such a man was an active persecutor, for there is no evidence that he was,* though it is certain that he had no good opinion of the Christians, as appears from his own words. j; But he knew nothing of them except their * Except tliat of Orosius (vii. 15), wLo says tLat during tlie PartLian war there were grievous persecutions of the Christians in Asia and Gallia under the orders of Marcus (praecepto ejus), and “many were crowned with the martyrdom of saints.” t See xi. 3. The emperor probably speaks of such fanatics as Clemens (quoted by Gataker on this passage) mentions. The rational Christians admitted no fellowship with them. “Some of these heretics,” says Clemens, “ show their impiety and cowardice by loving their lives, saying that the knowledge of the really existing God is true testimony (martyrdom), but that a 7nan is a self-murderer who bears witness by his death. We also blame those who rush to death, for there are some, not of us, but only bearing the same name, who give themselves up. We say of them that they die without being martyrs, even if they are publicly punished ; and they give them- selves up to a death which avails nothing, as the Indian Gymnoso- phists give themselves up foolishly to fire.” Cave, in his Primitive Christianity (ii. c. 7), says of the Christians : “ They did flock to the place of torment faster than droves of beasts that are driven to the shambles. They even longed to be in the arms of suffering. Ignatius, though then in his journey to Rome in order to his execu- tion, yet by the way as he went could not but vent his passionate maugus aurelws ANTomims. S3 hostility to the Eoman religion, and he probably thought that they were dangerous to the state, not- withstanding the professions false or true of some of the Apologists. So much I have said, because it would be unfair not to state all that can be urged against a man whom his contemporaries and subsequent ages venerated as a model of virtue and benevolence. If I admitted the genuineness of some documents, he would be altogether clear from the charge of even allowing any persecutions ; but as I seek the truth and am sure that they are false, I leave him to bear whatever blame is his due.* * I add that it is quite certain that Anto- ninus did not derivm any of his Ethical principles fi’om a religion of which he knew nothing.;}; There is no doubt that the Emperor’s Eeflections, or his Meditations, as they are generally named, is a genuine work. In the first book he speaks of himself, desire of it : “0 that I might come to those wild beasts, that are pre- pared for me ; I heartily wish that I may presently meet with them ; I would invite and encourage them speedily to devour me, and not be afraid to set upon me as they have been to others ; nay, should they refuse it, I would even force them to it and more to the same pur- pose from Eusebius. Cave, an honest and good man, says all this in praise of the Christians ; but I think that he mistook the matter. We admire a man who holds to his principles even to death ; but these fanatical Christians are the Gymnosophists whom Clemens treats with disdain. * Dr. F. C. Baur in his work entitled Das Christenthum und die Christliche Kirche der drei ersten Jahrhunderte, etc., has examined this question with great good sense and fairness, and I believe he has stated the truth as near as our authorities enable us to reach it. I In the Digest, 48, 19, 30, there is the following excerpt from Modestinus : “Si quis aliquid fecerit, quo leves hominum animi superstitione numinis terrerentur, divus Marcus hujusmodi homines in insulam relegari rescripsit.” 24 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF his family, and his teachers ; and in other books he mentions himself. Suidas notices a work of Antoninus in twelve books, which he names the “conduct of his own life;” and he cites the book under several words in his Dictionary, giving the emperor’s name, but not tlie title of the work. There are also passages cited by Suidas from Antoninus without mention of the emperor’s name. The true title of the work is un- known. Xylander, who published the first edition of this book (Zurich, 1558, 8vo., with a Latin version), used a manuscrijit, which contained the twelve books, but it is not known where the manuscript is now. The only other complete manuscrijA which is known to exist is in the Vatican library, but it has no title and no inscriptions of the several books : the eleventh only has the inscription MdpKoiavToxpdropo'; marked with an asterisk. The other Vatican manuscripts and the three Florentine contain only excerpts from the em- peror’s book. All the titles of the excerpts nearly agree with that which Xylander prefixed to his edition, Mdpxov ’Ayroovi'vov Auroxpdropo? tc3v eii kavrov ftiftXia ifi. This title has been used by all subsequent editors. We cannot tell whether Antoninus divided his work into books or somebody else did it. If the inscriptions at the end of the first and second books are genuine, he may have made the division himself. It is plain that the emperor wrote down his thoughts or reflections as the occasions arose ; and since they were intended for his own use, it is no improbable con- jecture that he left a complete copy behind him writ- ten with his own hand ; for it is not likel^'^ that so diligent a man would use the labor of a transcriber for such a purpose, and expose his most secret thoughts to MARGTT8 A TTRELITTS ANTONINUS. 25 any other eye. He may have also intended the book for his son Conimodus, who, however, had no taste for his father’s philosophy. Some careful hand preserved the precious volume ; and a work by Antoninus is mentioned by other late writers besides Suidas. Many critics have labored on the text of Antoninus. The most complete edition is that by Thomas Gataker, 1652, 4to. The second edition of Gataker was superin- tended by George Stanhope, 1697, dto. There is also an edition of 1704. Gataker made and suggested many good corrections, and he also made a new Latin version, which is not a very good specimen of Latin, but it generally expresses the sense of the original and often better than some of the more recent translations. He added, in the margin opposite to each paragraph, refer- ences to the other parallel passages ; and he wrote a commentary, one of the most complete that has been written on any ancient author. This commentary con- tains the editor’s exposition of the more difficult pas- sages, and quotations from all the Greek and Roman writers for the illustration of the text. It is a won- derful monument of learning and labor, and certainly no Englishman has yet done an 3 dhing like it. At the end of his preface the editor says that he wrote it at Rotherhithe, near London, in a severe winter, when he was in the seventy-eighth year of his age, 1651, a time when Milton, Selden and other great men of the Com- monwealth time were living; and the great French scholar Saumaise (Salmasius), with whom Gataker cor- responded and received help from him for his edition of Antoninus. The Greek text has also been edited by J. M. Schultz, Leipzig, 1802, 8vo.; and by the learned Greek Adamantinus Corais, Paris, 1816, 8vo. The text of Schultz was republished by Tauchnitz, 1821, 20 MOOnAPmCAL SKETCH OE There are Englisli, German; French, Italian and Spanish translations of Marcus Antoninus, and there may be others. I have not seen all the English trans- lations. There is one by Jeremy Collier, 1702, 8vo., a most coarse and vulgar copy of the original. The latest French translation by Alexis Pierron in the col- lection of Charpentier is better than Dacier’s, which has been honored with an Italian version (Udine, 1772). There is an Italian version (1675) which I have not seen. It is by a cardinal. “ A man illustrious in the church, the Cardinal Francis Barberini the elder, nephew of Pope Urban VIII, occupied the last years of his life in translating into his native language the thoughts of the Roman emperor, in order to diffuse among the faithful the fertilizing and vivifying seeds. Tie dedicated this translation to his soul, to make it, as he says in his energetic style, redder than his purple at the sight of the virtues of this Gentile ” (Pierron, Pre- face). I have made this translation at intervals after having used the book for many years. Is is made from the Greek, but I have not always followed one text ; and I have occasionally compared other versions with my own. I made this translation for my own use, because I found that it was worth the labor ; but it may be useful to others also, and therefore I determined to print it. As the original is sometimes very difficult to understand and still more difficult to translate, it is not possible that I have always avoided error. But I believe that I have not often missed the meaning, and those who will take the trouble to compare the trans- lation with the original should not hastily conclude that I am wrong, if they do not agree with me. Some MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 27 passages do give the meaning, though at first sight they may not appear to do so ; and when I differ from the translators, I think that in some places they are wrong, and in other places I am sure that they are. I have placed in some passages a f, which indicates corruption in the text or great uncertainty in the meaning. I could have made the language more easy and flowing, but I have preferred a ruder style as being better suited to express the character of the original ; and sometimes the obscurity which may appear in the version is a fair copy of the obscurity of the Greek. If I should ever revise this version, I would gladly make use of any corrections which may be suggested. If I have not given the best words for the Greek, I have done the best that I could ; and in the text I have always given the same translation of the same word. The last reflection of the Stoic philosophy that I have observed is in Simplicius’ Commentary on the Encheiridion of Epictetus. Simphcius was not a Christian, and such a man was not likely to be con- verted at a time when Christianity was grossly cor- rupted. But he was a really religious man, and he concludes his commentary with a prayer to the Deity which no Christian could improve. From the time of Zeno to Simplicius, a period of about nine hundred years, the Stoic philosophy formed the characters of some of the best and greatest men. Finally it became extinct, and we hear no more of it till the revival of letters in Italy. Angelo Poliziano met with two very inaccurate and incomplete manuscripts of Epictetus’ Encheiridion, which he translated into Latin and dedi- cated to his great patron Lorenzo de’ Medici, in whose 28 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH. collection he had found the book. Poliziano’s version was printed in the first Bfile edition of the Encheiridion, A. D. 1531 (apud And. Cratandruin). Poliziano recom- mends the Encheiridion to Lorenzo as a work well suited to his temper, and useful in the difficulties by which he Avas surrounded. Epictetus and Antoninus have had readers ever since they were first printed. The little book of Antoninus has been the companion of some great men. Machia- velli’s Art of War and Marcus Antoninus Avere the turn books Avhich Avere used Avhen he Avas a young man by Captain John Smith, and he could not haAm found tAvo AAWiters better fitted to form the character of a soldier and a man. Smith is almost unknoAvn and forgotten in England, his nature country, but not in America Avhei-e he saved the young colony of Virginia. He Avas great in his heroic mind and his deeds in arms, but greater still m the nobleness of his character. For a man’s greatness lies not in wealth and station, as the Audgar believe, nor yet in his intellectual capacity, Avhich is often associated with the meanest moral character, the most abject servility to those in high places and arrogance to the poor and loAAdy ; but a man’s true greatness lies in the consciousness of an honest purpose in life, founded on a just estimate of himself and everAdhing else, on frequent self-examina- tion, and a steady obedience to the rule Avhich he knoAA^s to be right, Avithout troubling himself, as the emperor says he should not, about Avhat others may think or say, or Avhether they do or do not do that Avhich he thinks and says and does. THE PHILOSOPHY OP Marcus Aurelius Antoninus BY THE TRANSLATOR. The Philosophy of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, It has been said that the Stoic philosophy first showed its real value when it passed from Greece to Rome. The doctrines of Zeno and his successors wmre well suited to the gravity and practical good sense of the Romans ; and even in the Republican period we have an example of a man, M. Cato Uticensis, who lived the life of a Stoic and died consistently wiLii the opinions which he professed. He was a man, says Cicero, who embraced the Stoic philosophy froni con- viction ; not for the purpose of vain discussion, as most did, but in order to make his life conformable to the Stoic precepts. In the wretched times from the death of Augustus to the murder of Domitian, there was nothing but the Stoic philosophy which could console and support the followers of the old religion under imperial tyranny and amid universal corruption. There were even then noble minds that could dare and endure, sustained by a good conscience and an elevated idea of the purposes of man’s existence. Such were Paetus Thrasea, Helvidius Priscus, Cornutus, C. Muso- nius Rufus,* and the poets Persius and Juvenal, wdiose *I have omitted Seneca, Nero’s preceptor. He was in a sense a Stoic, and he has said many good things in a very fine way. There is 32 PHILOSOPHY OF enero'etic language and manly thoughts may be as instructive to us now as they might have been to their contemporaries. Persius died under Nero’s blood}'" reign, but Juvenal had the good fortune to survive the tyrant Domitian and to see the better times of Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian.'’'" His best precepts are derived from the Stoic school, and they are enforced in his finest verses by the unrivaled vigor of the Latin language. The two best expounders of the later Stoical philos- ophy were a Greek slave and a Roman emperor. Epictetus, a Phrygian Greek, was brought to Rome, we know not how, but he was there the slave and after- ward the freedman of an unworthy master, Epaphro- ditus by name, himself a freedman and a favorite of Nero. Epictetus may have been a hearer of 0. Muso- nius Rufus, while he was still a slave, but he could hardly have been a teacher before he was made free. He was one of the philosophers whom Domitian’s order banished from Rome. He retired to Nicopolis in Epirus, and he may have died there. Like other great teachers he wrote nothing, and we are indebted to his grateful pupil Arrian for what we have of Epictetus’ discourses. Arrian wrote eight books of the discourses of Epictetus, of which only four remain a judgment of Gellius (xii. 2) on Seneca, or rather a statement of what some people thought of his philosophy, and it is not favorable. His writings and his life must be taken together, and I have nothing more to say of him here. The reader will find a notice of Seneca and his philofsophy in “ Seekers after God,” by the Eev. F. W. Farrar. * Ribbeck has labored to prove that those Satires, which contain philosophical precejits, are not the work of the real, but of a false Juvenal, a Declamator. Still the verses exist, and were written by somebody who was acquainted with the Stoic doctrines. MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 33 and some fragments. We have also from Arrian’s hand the small Encheiridion or Manual of the chief precepts of Epictetus. There is a a valuable commen- tary on the Encheiridion by Simplicius, who lived in the time of the Emperor Justinian.'^ Antoninus in his first book (i. 7), in which he grate- fully commemorates his obligations to his teachers, says that he was made acquainted by Junius Rusticus with the discourses of Epictetus, whom he mentions also in other passages (iv. 41 ; xi. 34, 36). Indeed, the doctrines of Epictetus and Antoninus are the same, and Epictetus is the best authority for the explanation of the philosophical language of Antoninus and the exposition of his opinions. But the method of the two philosophers is entirely different. Epictetus addressed himself to his hearers in a continuous dis- course and in a familiar and simple manner. Anton- inus wrote down his reflections for his own use only, in short, unconnected paragraphs, which are often obscure. The Stoics made three divisions of philosophy. Physic, Ethic and Logic (viii. 13). This division, we are told by Diogenes, was made by Zeno of Citium, the founder of the Stoic sect, and by Chrysippus ; but these philosophers placed the three divisions in the following order. Logic, Physic, Ethic. It appears, however, that this division was made before Zeno’s time and acknowledged by Plato, as Cicero remarks (Acad. Post. i. 5). Logic is not synonymous with our term Logic in the narrower sense of that word. * There is a complete edition of Arrian’s Epictetus, with the com- mentary of Simplicius by J. Schweighaeuser, 6 vols. 8vo. 1799, 1800. There is also an English translation of Epictetus by Prof. Long, pub- lished in this series: Burt’s Library of the World’s Best Books. 34 PHILOSOPHY OF Cleantlies, a Stoic, subdivided the three divisions, and made six: Dialectic and Rhetoric, comprised in Logic ; Ethic and Politic ; Physic and Theology. This division was merely for practical use, for all Idiilosopliy is one. Even among the earliest Stoics, Logic or Dialectic does not occupy the same place as in Plato : it is considered only as an instrument which is to be used for the other divisions of Philosophy. An exposition of the earlier Stoic doctrines and of their modifications would require a volume. My object is to explain only the opinions of Antoninus, so far as they can be collected from his book. According to the subdivision of Cleanthes, Physic and Theology go together, or the stud}' of the nature of Things and the study of the nature of the Deity, so far as man can understand the Deity, and of his govern- ment of the universe. This division or subdivision is not formally adopted by Antoninus, for, as already observed, there is no method in his book, but it is virtually contained in it. Cleanthes also connects Ethic and Politic, or the study of the ])rinciples of morals and the study of the constitution of civil society; and undoubtedly he did well in subdividing Ethic into two parts. Ethic in the narrower sense and Politic, for though the two are in- timately connected they are also very distinct, and many questions can only be properly discussed by carefully observing the distinction. Antoninus does not treat of Politic. Llis subject is Ethic, and Ethic in its practical application to his own conduct in life as a man and as a governor. His Ethic is founded on his doctrines about man’s nature, the Universal ISlature, and the relation of every man to everything else. It MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 35 is therefore intimately and inseparably connected with Physic or the nature of Things, and with Theology or the nature of the Deity. He advises us to examine well all the impressions on our minds {avra6iai). and forming from them distinct ideas (Begriiie), and perceiyiug differences. I do not think that these remarks will help the reader to the understanding of Antoninus, or his use of the words j'ouSand A6yo%. The Emperor’s meaning must be got from his own words, and if it does not agree altogether with modern notions, it is not our business to farce it into agreement, but simply to find out what his meaning is, if we can. * Comp. Ep. to the Corinthians, i. 3, 17, and James iv. 8, “ Draw nigh to God and he will draw nigh to you.” 50 PHILOSOPHY OF divinity within us, for it is only in this way that we can have any knowledge of the nature of God. The human soul is in a sense a portion of the divinity, and the soul alone has any communication with the Deity, for as he says (xii. 2): “With his intellectual part alone God touches the intelligence only which has flowed and been derived from himself into these bodies.” In fact, he says that which is hidden within a man is life — that is the man himself. All the rest is vesture, covering, organs, instrument, which the living man, the real* man, uses for the purpose of his present existence. The air is universally diffused for him who is able to respire, and so for him who is willing to partake of it * This is also Swedenborg’s doctrine of the soul. “As to what concerns the soul, of which it is said that it shall live after death, it is nothing else but the man himself, who lives in the body, that is, the interior man, who by the body acts in the world and from whom the body itself lives” (quoted by Clissold, p. 456 of “The Practical Nature of the Theological Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg, in a Letter to the Archbishop of Dublin (Whately),” second edition, 1859; a book which theologians might read with profit). This is an old doctrine of the soul, which has been often proclaimed, but never better expressed than by the “ Auctor de Muiido,” c. 6, quoted by Gataker in his “Antoninus,” p. 436. “The soul by which we live and have cities and houses is invisible, but it is seen by its works; for the whole method of life has been devised by it and ordered, and by it is held together. In like manner we must think also about the deity, who in power is most mighty, in beauty most comely, in life immortal, and in virtue supreme; wherefore though he is invisible to human nature, he is seen by his very works.” Other passages to the same purpose are quoted by Gataker (p. 382). Bishop Butler has the same as to the soul; “ Upon the whole then our organs of sense and our limbs are certainly instruments, which the living persons, our- selves, make use of to perceive and move with.” If this is not plain enough, he also says; “ It follows that our organized bodies are no more ourselves, or part of ourselves, than any other matter around us.” (Compare Anton, x. 38.) MARCUS AURELIUS AMTONINUS. 51 the intelligent power, which holds within it all things, is ditfused as wide and free as the air (viii. 64). It is by living a divine life that man approaches to a knowl- edge of the divinity.* It is by following the divinity within, as Antoninus calls it, that man comes nearest to the Deity, the supreme good, for man can never attain to perfect agreement with his internal guide. “ Live with the gods. And he does live with the gods who constantly shows to them that his own soul is satisfied with that which is assigned to him, and that it does all the demon Avishes, which Zeus hath given to every man for his guardian and guide, a portion of himself. And this demon is evei’y man’s understanding and reason” (v. 27). There is in man, that is in the reason, the intelli- gence, a superior faculty Avhich if it is exercised rules all the rest. This is the ruling faculty which Cicero (De Natura Deorum, ii. 11) renders by the Latin word Principatus, “ to Avhich nothing can or ought to be superior.” Antoninus often uses this term, and others which are equivalent. He names it (vii. 64) “ the governing intelligence.” The governing faculty is the master of the soul (v. 26). A man must reverence *Tlie reader may consult Discourse V. ‘Of tlie existence and nature of God,” in John Smith’s “ Select Discourses.” He has prefixed as a text to this Discourse, the striking passage of Agapetus, Paraenes, §3: “ He who knows himself will know God; and he who knows God will be made like to God; and he will be made like to God, who has become worthy of God; and he becomes worthy of God, who does nothing unworthy of God, but thinks the things that are his, and speaks what he thinks, and does what he speaks.” I suppose that the old saying, “ Know thyself,” which is attributed to Socrates and others, had a larger meaning than the narrow sense which is gener- ally given to it. (Agapetus, ed. Stephan. Schoning, Franeker, 1608. This volume contains also the Parseneses of Nilus.) 52 PHILOSOPHY OP only his ruling facultj^ and the divinity within him. As we must reverence that which is supreme in the universe, so we must reverence that which is supreme in ourselves, and this is that which is of like kind with tliat which is supreme in the universe (v. 21). So, as riotinus says, the soul of man can only know the divine, so far as it knows itself. In one passage (xi. 19) Antoninus speaks of a man’s condemnation of himself, Avhen the diviner part Avithin him has been over- poAvered and yields to the less honorable and to the perishable part, the body, and its gross pleasures. In a Avord, the views of Antoninus on this matter, hoAV- ever his expressions may vary, are exactly Avhat Bishop Butler expresses, Avhen he speaks of “ the natural supremacy of reflection or conscience,” of the faculty “Avhich surveys, approves or disapproves the several affections of our mind and actions of our lives.” Much matter might be collected from Antoninus on the notion of the Universe being one animated Being. But all that he says amounts to no more, as Schultz re- marks, than this : the soul of man is most intimately united to his body, and together they make one animal, Avhiclr we call man ; so the Deity is most intimately united to the Avorld or the material universe, and together they form one Avhole. But Antoninus did not vicAv God and the material universe as the same, any more than he vicAved the body and soul of man as one. Antoninus has no speculations on the absolute nature of the deity. It Avas not his fashion to Avaste his time on Avhat man cannot understand.* He was satisfied that God exists, that he governs all things, that man ^ “ God is infinitely beyond the reach of our narrow capacities.” Locke : Essay concerning the Human Understanding, ii. chap. 17. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 53 can only have an imperfect knowledge of his nature, and he must attain this imperfect knowledge by reverencing the divinity which is within him, and keeping it pure. From all that has been said it follows that the uni- verse is administered by the Providence of God, and that all things are wisely ordered. There are passages in which Antoninus expresses doubts, or states different possible theories of the constitution and government of the Universe, but he always recurs to his fundamental principle, that if Ave admit the existence of a deity, Ave must also admit that he orders all things Avisely and well (iv. 27 ; vi. 1 ; ix. 28 ; xii. 5, and many other pas- sages). Epictetus saA"S (1. 6) that Ave can discern the providence Avhich rules the AAmrld, if we possess two things, the poAver of seeing all that happens with respect to each thing, and a grateful disposition. But if all things are Avisely ordered, Iioav is the world so full of Avhat Ave call evil, ph3^sical and moral? If, instead of saying that there is evil in the Avorld, Ave use the expression Avhich I have used, “ Avhat Ave call evil,” we have partl}”^ anticipated the emperor’s ansAA^er. We see and feel and know imperfectly very feAV things in the feAv years that we live, and all the knoAvledge and all the experience of all the human race is positive ignorance of the Avhole, which is infinite. How as our reason teaches us that everything is in some way related to and connected Avith every other thing, all notion of oauI as being in the universe of things is a contradiction, tor if the Avhole comes from and is gOA^erned by an intelligent being, it is impossible to conceive anything in it Avhich tends to the evil or destruction of the Avhole (viii. 55 ; x. 6). Everything 54 PHILOSOPHY OF is in constant mutation, and yet the whole subsists. We might imagine the solar system resolved into its elemental parts, and yet the whole would still subsist “ ever young and perfect.” All things, all forms, are dissolved and new forms appear. All living things undergo the change which we call death. If we call death an evil, then all change is an evil. Living beings also suffer pain, and man suffers most of all, for he suffers both in and by his body and by his intelligent part. Men suffer also from one another, and ])erhaps the largest part of human suffering comes to man from those whom he calls his brothers. Antoninus says (viii. 55), “Gen- erally, wickedness does no harm at all to the universe ; and particularly, the wickedness [of one man] does no harm to another. It is only harmful to him who has it in his power to be released from it as soon as he shall choose.” The first part of this is perfectly consistent with the doctrine that the whole can sus- tain no evil or harm. The second part must be explained by the Stoic principle that there is no evil in anything which is not in our power. What wrong we suffer from another is his evil, not ours. But this is an admission that there is evil in a sort, for he who does wrong does evil, and if others can endure the wrong, still there is evil in the wrong doer. Anton- inus (xi. 18) gives many excellent precepts with respect to wrongs and injuries, and his precepts are practical. He teaches us to bear what we cannot avoid, and his lessons may be just as useful to him who denies the being and the government of God as to him who believes in both. There is no direct answer in Antoninus to the objections which may be MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 55 made to the existence and providence of God because of the moral disorder and suffering which are in the world, except this answer which he makes in reply to the supposition that even the best men may be extin- guished by death. He says if it is so, we may be sure that if it ought to have been otherwise, the gods would have ordered it otherwise (xii. 5). His convic- tion of the wisdom which we may observe in the gov- ernment of the world is too strong to be disturbed by any apparent irregularities in the order of things. That these disorders exist is a fact, and those who would conclude from them against the being and gov- ernment of God conclude too hastily. We all admit that there is an order in the material world, a Hature, in the sense in which that word has been explained, a constitution, what we call a system, a relation of parts to one another and a fitness of the whole for some- thing. So in the constitution of plants and of animals there is an order, a fitness for some end. Sometimes the order, as we conceive it, is interrupted, and the end, as we conceive it, is not attained. The seed, the plant or the animal sometimes perishes before it has passed through all its changes and done all its uses. It is according to Hature, that is a fixed order, for some to perish earl}^ and for others to do all their uses and leave successors to take their place. So man has a corporeal and intellectual and moral consti- tution fit for certain uses, and, on the whole, man performs these uses, dies and leaves other men in his place. So society exists, and a social state is manifestly the Hatural State of man, the State for which his Hature fits him ; and society amid innumerable irregularities and disorders still sub- sists ; and perhaps we may say that the history of 56 PHILOSOPHY OF the past and our present knowledge give us a reason- able hope that its disorders will diminish, and that order, its governing principle, may be more firmly established. As order then, a fixed order, we may say, subject to deviations, real or apparent, must be admitted to exist in the whole IS'ature of things, that which we call disorder or evil as it seems to us, does not in any wmy alter the fact of the general constitu- tion of things having a Nature or fixed order. No- body will conclude from the existence of disorder that order is not the rule, for the existence of order both physical and moral is proved by daily experience and all past experience. We cannot conceive how the order of the universe is maintained ; we cannot even conceive how our own life from day to day is con- tinued, nor how we perform the simplest movements of the body, nor how we grow and think and act, though we know many of the conditions which are necessary for all these functions. Knowing nothing, then, of the unseen power which acts in ourselves except by what is done, we know nothing of the power which acts through what we call all time and all space ; but seeing that there is a nature or fixed order in all things known to us, it is conformable to the nature of our minds to believe that this uni- versal Nature has a cause which operates continually, and that we are totally unalfie to speculate on the reason of any of those disorders or evils w^hich we perceive. This I believe is the answer which may be collected from all that Antoninus has said.* * Clean tiles says in his hymn: “ For all things good and bad to One thou fonnest, So that One everlasting reason governs all.” See Bishop Butler’s Sermons. Sermon XV. “ Upon the Ignorance ol Man.” MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 57 The origin of evil is an old question. Achilles tells Priam (Ihad, 24, 527) that Zeus has two casks, one filled with good things and the other with bad, and that he gives to men out of each according to his pleasure; and so we must be content, for we cannot alter the will of Zeus. One of the Greek commenta- tors asks how must we reconcile this doctrine with what we find in the first book of the Odyssey, where the king of the gods says, Men say that evil comes to them from us, but they bring it on themselves through their own folly. The answer is plain enough, even to the Greek commentator. The poets make both Achilles and Zeus speak appropriately to their several charac- ters. Indeed, Zeus says plainly that men do attribute their sufferings to the gods, but they do it falsely, for they are the cause of their own sorrows. Epictetus, in his Encheiridion (c. 27), makes short work of the question of evil. He sa}^s; “As a mark is not set up for the purpose of missing it, so neither does the nature of evil exist in the Universe.” This will appear obscure enough to those who are not acquainted with Epictetus, but he ahvays knoAvs Avhat he is talking about. We do not set up a mark in order to miss it, though we may miss it. God, whose existence Epic- tetus assumes, has not ordered all things so that his purpose shall fail. Whatever there may be of Avhat we call evil, the Hature of evdl, as he expresses it, does not exist — that is, evil is not a part of the constitution or nature of Things. If there were a principle of eA^il in the constitution of things, evil would no longer be evil, as Simplicius argues, but evil would be good. Simplicius (c. 34, [27]) has a long and curious dis- course on this text of Epictetus, and it is amusing and instructive. 58 PHILOSOPHY OF One passage more will conclude this matter. It contains all that the emperor could say (ii. 11): “To go from among men, if there are gods, is not a thing to be afraid of, for the gods will not involve thee in evil ; but if indeed they do not exist, or if they have no concern about human affairs, what is it to me to live in a universe devoid of gods or devoid of providence? Hut in truth they do exist, and they do care for human things, and they have put all the means in man’s power to enable him not to fall into real evils. And as to the rest, if there was anything evil they would have pro- vided for this also, that it should be altogether in a man’s power not to fall into it. But that which does not make a man worse, how can it make a man’s life worse ? But neither through ignorance, nor having the knowledge, but not the power to guai’d against or correct these things, is it possible that the nature of the Universe has overlooked them ; nor is it possible that it has made so great a mistake, either through want of power or want of skill, that good and evil should happen indiscriminately to the good and the bad. But death certainly and life, honor and dishonor, pain and pleasure — all these things equally happen to good and bad men, being things which make us neither better nor worse. Therefore they are neither good nor evil.” The Ethical part of Antoninus’ Philosophy follows from his general principles. The end of all his philosophy is to live comformably to Nature, both a man’s OAvn nature and the nature of the UnNerse. Bishop Butler has explained Avhat the Greek philosophers meant when they spoke of living according to Nature, and he says that when it is explained, as he has explained it and as MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 59 they understood it, it is “a manner of speaking not loose and undeterminate, but clear and distinct, strictly just and true.” To live according to Nature is to live according to a man’s whole nature, not according to a part of it) and to reverence the divinity within him as the governor of all his actions. “To the rational animal the same act is according to nature and accord- ing to reason”* (vii. 11). That which is done contrary to reason is also an act contrary to nature, to the whole nature, though it is certainly comformable to some part of man’s nature, or it could not be done. Man is made for action, not for idleness or pleasure. As plants and animals do the uses of their nature, so man must do his (v. 1). Man must also live comformably to the universal nature, comformably to the nature of all things of which he is one; and as a citizen of a political community he must direct his life and actions with reference to those among whom, and for whom, among other purposes, he lives.f A man must not retire into solitude and cut himself off from his fellow men. He must be ever active to do his part in the great whole. All men are his kin, not only in blood but still more by participating in the same intelligence and by being a portion of the same divinity. A man cannot really be injured by his brethren, for no act of theirs can make him bad, and he must not be angry with them nor hate them: “For we are made for co-operation, like feet, like hands, like eyelids, like the rows of the upper and lower teeth. To act against one another then is * This is what Juvenal means when he says (xiv. 321) — Nunquam aliud Xatura aliud Sapientia dicit. f See viii. 52; and Persius iii. 66. 60 PHILOSOPHY OF contrary to nature ; and it is acting against one another to be vexed and to turn away ” (ii. 1). Further he says : “ Take pleasure in one thing and rest in it, in passing from one social act to another social act, thinking of God ” (vi. 7). Again : “ Love mankind. Follow God ” (vii. 31). It is the charac- teristic of the rational soul for a man to love his neigh- bor (xi. 1). Antoninus teaches in various passages the forgiveness of injuries, and we know that he also practiced what he taught. Bishop Butler remarks that “ this divine precept to forgive injuries and to love our enemies, though to be met with in Gentile moralists, yet is in a peculiar sense a precept of Christianity, as our Saviour has insisted more upon it than on any other single virtue.” The practice of this prece])t is the most difficult of all virtues. Antoninus often enforces it and gives us aid toward following it. When we are injured, we feel anger and resentment, and the feeling is natural, just and useful for the con- servation of society. It is useful that wrong doers should feel the natural consequences of their actions, among which is the disapprobation of society and the resentment of him who is wronged. But revenge, in the proper sense of that word, must not be practiced. “ The best way of avenging thyself,” says the emperor, “ is not to become like the wrong doer.” It is plain by this that he does not mean that we should in any case practice revenge; but he says to those who talk of revenging wrongs. Be not like him who has done the wrong. Socrates in the Crito (c. 10) says the same in other words, and St. Paul (Ep. to the Eomans, xii. 17). “ AYhen a man has done thee any wrong, immediately consider with what opinion about good or evil he has MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 61 done wrong. For when thou hast seen this, thou wilt pity him and wilt neither wonder nor be an^ry ” (vii. 26). Antoninus would not deny that wrong natu- rally produces the feeling of anger and resentment, for this is implied in the recommendation to reflect on the nature of the man’s mind who has done the wrong, and then you will have pity instead of resentment ; and so it comes to the same as St. Paul’s advice to be angry and sin not ; which, as Butler well ex})lains it, is not a recommendation to be angry, which nobody needs, for anger is a natural passion, but it is a warning against allowing anger to lead us into sin. In short the emperor’s doctrine about wrongful acts is this : wrong doers do not know what good and bad are ; they offend out of ignorance, and in the sense of the Stoics this is true. Though this kind of ignorance will never be admitted as a legal excuse, and ought not to be admitted as a full excuse in any way by society, there may be grievous injuries, such as it is in a man’s power to forgive without harm to society ; and if he forgives because he sees that his enemies know not what they do, he is acting in the spirit of the sublime prayer, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” The emperor’s moral philosophy was not a feeble, narrow system, which teaches a man to look directly to his own happiness, though a man’s happiness or tranquillity is indirectly promoted by living as he ought to do. A man must live conformably to the universal nature, which means, as the emperor explains it in many passages, that a man’s actions must be conform- able to his true relations to all other human beings, both as a citizen of a political cominunity and as a 62 PHILOSOPHY OF member of the whole human family. This implies, and he often expresses it in the most forcible language, that a man’s words and actions, so far as they affect others, must be measured by a fixed rule, which in their consistency with the conservation and the interests of the particular society of which he is a member, and of the whole human race. To live com- formably to such a rule, a man must use his rational faculties in order to discern clearly the consequences and full effect of all his actions and of the actions of others ; he must not live a life of contemplation and reflection only, though he must often retire within himself to calm and purify his soul by thought,* but he must mingle in the work of man and be a fellow- laborer for the general good. A man should have an object or purpose in life, that he may direct all his energies to it; of course a good object (ii. 7). He who has not one object or purpose of life, cannot be one and the same all through his life (xi. 21). Bacon has a remark to the same effect, on the best means of “ reducing of the mind unto virtue and good estate; which is the electing and propound- ing unto a man’s self good and virtuous ends of his life, such as may be in a reasonable sort within his compass to attain.” He is a happy man who has been wise enough to do this when he was young and has had the opportunities; but the emperor seeing well that a man cannot always be so wise in his youth, encourages him- self to do it when he can, and not to let life slip away before he has begun. He who can propose to himself good and virtuous ends of life, and be true to them, cannot fail to live comformably to his own interest and * Ut nemo in sese tentat descendere, nemo. — Pcrsius, iv. 31. MARCUS A UEELIUS ANTONINUS. 63 the universal interest, for in the nature of things they are one. If a thing is not good for the hive, it is not good for the bee (vi. 54). One passage may end this -matter. “ If the gods have determined about me and about the things which must happen to me, they have determined well, for it is not easy even to imagine a deity without forethought; and as to doing me harm, why should they have any desire toward that? For what advantage woidd result to them from this or to the whole, which is the special object of their providence? But if they have not de- termined about me individually, they have certainly determined about the whole at least ; and the things which happen by way of sequence in this general arrangement I ought to accept with pleasure and to be content with them. But if they determine about nothing — which it is wicked to believe, or if we do believe it, let us neither sacrifice nor pray nor swear by them, nor do anything else which we do as if the gods were present and lived with us — but if, however, the gods determine about none of the things which con- cern us, I am able to determine about myself, and I can inquire about that which is useful ; and that is useful to every man which is conformable to his own constitution and nature. But my nature is rational and social ; and my city and country, so far as I am Antoninus, is Rome ; but so far as I am a man, it is the world. The things then which are useful to these cities are alone useful to me” (vi. 44). It would be tedious, and it is not necessary to state the emperor’s opinions on all the ways in which a man may profitably use his understanding toward perfect- ing himself in practical virtue. The passages to this G4 PHILOSOPHY OF ]inrpose are in all parts of his book, but as they are in no order or connection, a man must use the book a long time before he will find out all that is in it. A few words may be added here. If we analyze all other tljings, we find how insufficient thej^ are for human life and hoAV truly worthless many of them are. Virtue alone is indivisible, one, and perfectly satisfying. The notion of Virtue cannot be considered vague or un- settled, because a man may find it difficult to explain the notion fully to himself or to expound it to others in such a Avay as to ]>revent cavilling. Virtue is a Avhole,and no more consists of parts than man’s intelli- gence does ; and yet we speak of A'ai'ious intellectual faculties as a convenient way of expressing the various powers Avhich man’s intellect shows by his Avorks. In the same Avay we may speak of various virtues or parts of virtue, in a practical sense, for the purpose of shoAV- ing Avhat particular virtues Ave ought to practice in order to the exercise of the Avhole of virtue — that is, as much as man’s nature is capable of. The prime principle in man’s constitution is social. The next in order is not to yield to the persuasions of the body when they are not conformable to the rational principle, Avhich must govern. The third is freedom from error and from deception. “ Let then the ruling jirinciple holding fast to these things go straight on, and it has what is its OAAm” (Aui. 55). The emperor selects justice as the virtue Avhich is the basis of all the rest (x. 11), and this had been said long before his time. It is true that all people have some notion of Avhat is meant by justice as a disposition of the mind, and some notion about acting in conformity to this disposition; MARCUS A URELIU8 ANTONINUS. 65 but experience shows that men’s notions about justice are as confused as their actions are inconsistent with the true notion of justice. The emperor’s notion of justice is clear enough, but not practical enough for all mankind. “ Let there be freedom from perturbations with respect to the things which come from the exter- nal cause, and let there be justice in the things done by virtue of the internal cause — that is, let there be move- ment and action terminating in this, in social acts, for this is according to thy nature” (ix. 31). In another place (ix. 1) he says that “he who acts unjustly acts impiousl}^” which follows of course from all that he says in various places. He insists on the practice of truth as a virtue and as a means to virtue, which no doubt it is: for lying, even in indifferent things, weakens the understanding, and lying maliciously is as great a moral offense as a man can be guilty of, viewed both as showing an habitual disposition and viewed with respect to consequences. He couples the notion of justice with action. A man must not pride himself on having some fine notion of justice in his head, but he must exhibit his justice in act, like St. James’ notion of faith. But this is enough. The Stoics and Antoninus among them call some things beautiful and some ugly, and as the}'" are beauti- ful so they are good, and as they are ugly so they are evil or bad (ii. 1). All these things good and evil are in our power, absolutely some of the stricter Stoics would say ; in a manner only, as those who would not depart altogether from common sense would say ; prac- tically they are to a great degree in the power of some persons and in some circumstances, but in a small degree only in other persons and in other circum- 66 PHILOSOPHY OP stances. The 8toics maintain man’s free will as to the things which are in his power; for as to the things which are out of his power, free will terminating in very action is of course excluded by tlie terms of the expression. I hardly know if we can discover exactly Antoninus’ notion of the free will of man, nor is the question worth the inquiiy. What he does mean and does say is intelligible. All the things which are not in our power are indifferent : they are neither good nor bad morally. Such are life, health, wealth, power, disease, poverty and death. Life and death are all men’s portion. Health, wealth, power, disease and poverty happen to men indifferently to the good and to the bad ; to those who live according to nature and to those who do not.* “Life,” says the emperor, “is a warfare and a stranger’s sojourn, and after fame is oblivion” (ii. 17). After speaking of those men who have disturbed the world and then died, and of the death of philosophers such as Heraclitus and Democri- tus, who was destroyed by lice, and of Socrates, whom other lice (his enemies) destroyed, he says: “What means all this? Thou hast embarked, thou hast made the voyage, thou art come to shore ; get out. If indeed to another life, there is no want of gods, not even there. But if to a state without sensation, thou wilt cease to be held by pains and pleasures, and to be a slave to the vessel which is as much inferior as that * “-All events come alike to all; there is one event to the righteous and to the wicked; to the good and to the clean and to the unclean,” etc. Ecclesiastes, ix. v. 2; and v. 3; “This is an evil among all things that are done under the sun, that there is one event unto all. ” In what sense “evil ” is meant here seems rather doubtful. There is no doubt about the Emperor’s meaning. Compare Epictetus, Encheiri- dion, c. i., etc.; and the doctrine of the Brachmans (Strabo, p. 713, ed. Cas.). MARCUS A URELtUS ANTONINUS. 6? which serves it is superior ; for the one is intelligence and deity ; the other is earth and corruption ” (iii. 3). It is not death that a man should fear, but he should fear never beginning to live according to nature (xii. 1). Every man should live in such a way as to discharge his duty, and to trouble himself about nothing else. He should live such a life that he shall always be ready for death, and shall depart content when the summons comes. For what is death ? “ A cessation of the impressions through the senses, and of the pulling of the strings which move the appetites and of the discursive movements of the thoughts, and of the service to the flesh (vi. 28). Death is such as generation is, a mystery of nature (iv. 5). In another passage, the exact meaning of which is perhaps doubtful (ix. 3), he speaks of the child which leaves the womb, and so he says the soul at death leaves its envelope. As the child is born or comes into life by leaving the womb, so the soul may on leaving the body pass into another existence which is perfect. I am not sure if this is the emperor’s meaning. Butler compares it with a passage in Strabo (p. 713) about the Brachmans’ notion of death being the birth into real life and a happy life to those who have philosophized; and he thinks that Antoninus may allude to this opinion.* * Seneca (Ep. 102) lias the same, whether an expression of his own opinion, or merely a fine saying of others employed to embellish his writings, I know not. After speaking of the child being prepared in the womb to live this life, he adds, “ Sic per hoc spatium, quod ah infantia patet in senectutem, in alium naturae sumimur partum. Alia origo nos expectat, alius rerum status.” See Ecclesiastes, xii. 7; and Lucan, i. 457: “Longae, canitis si cognita, vitae Mors media est.” 68 PHILOSOPHY OF Antoninus’ opinion of a future life is nowhere clearly expressed. Ilis doctrine of the nature of the soul of necessity implies that it does not perish absolutely, for a portion of the divinity cannot perish. The opinion is at least as old as the time of Epicharmus and Euri- pides ; what comes from earth goes back to earth, and what comes from heaven, the divinity, returns to him who gave it. But I find nothing clear in Antoninus as to the notion of the man existing after death so as to be conscious of his sameness with that soul which occupied his vessel of clay. He seems to be perplexed on this matter, and finally to have rested in this, that God or the gods will do whatever is best and consist- ent with the university of things. Nor, I think, does he speak conclusively on another Stoic doctrine, which some Stoics practiced, the antici- pating the regular course of nature by a man’s own act. The reader will find some passages in which this is touched on, and he may make of them what he can. But there are passages in which the emperor encour- ages himself to wait for the end patiently and with tranquillity ; and certainly it is consistent with all his best teaching that a man should bear all that falls to his lot and do useful acts as long as he lives. He should not, therefore, abridge the time of his useful- ness by his own act. Whether he contemplates any possible cases in which a man should die by his own hand, I cannot tell, and the matter is not worth a curious inquiry, for I believe it would not lead to any certain result as to his opinion on this point I do not think that Antoninus, who never mentions Seneca, though he must have known all about him, would have agreed with Seneca when he gives as a reason for MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 69 suicide, that the eternal law, whatever he means, has made nothing better for us than this, that it has given us only one way of entering into life and many ways of going out of it. The ways of going out indeed are many, and that is a good reason for a man taking care of himself.* Happiness was not the direct object of a Stoic’s life. There is no rule of life contained in the precept that a man should pursue his own happiness. Many men think that they are seeking happiness when they are only seeking the gratification of some particular pas- sion, the strongest that they have. The end of a man is, as already explained, to live conformably to nature, and he will thus obtain happiness, tranquillity of mind and contentment (iii. 12; viii. 1, and other places). As a means of living conformably to nature he must study the four chief virtues, each of which has its proper sphere : wisdom, or the knowledge of good and evil ; justice, or the giving to every unan his due; fortitude, or the enduring of labor and pain ; and temperance, which is moderation in all things. By thus living con- formably to nature the Stoic obtained all that he wished or expected. His reward was in his virtuous life, and he was satisfied with that. Some Greek poet long ago wrote : O O For virtue only of all human things Takes her reward not from the hands of others. Virtue herself rewards the toils of virtue. Some of the Stoics indeed expressed themselves in very arrogant, absurd terms, about the wise man’s self *See Plinius, H. N. ii. c. 7; Seneca, De Provid. c. 6; and Ep. 70; “Nihil melius aeterna lex,” etc. PHILOSOPHY OF MARCtlS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. sufficiency ; they elevated him to the rank of a deity.* But these were only talkers and lecturers, such as those in all ages who utter fine words, know little of human affairs, and care only for notoriety. Epictetus and Antoninus both by precept and example labored to improve themselves and others ; and if we discover imperfections in their teaching, we must still honor these great men who attempted to show that there is in man’s nature and in the constitution of things sufficient reason for living a virtuous life. It is diffi- cult enough to live as we ought to live, difficult even for any man to live in such a way as to satisfy himself, if he exercises only in a moderate degree the power of reflecting upon and reviewing his own conduct ; and if all men cannot be brought to the same opinions in morals and religion, it is at least worth while to give them good reasons for as much as they can be per- suaded to accept. * J. Smith in his Select Discourses on “ the Excellency and Noble- ness of True Religion ” (c. vi.)has remarked on this Stoical arrogance. He finds it in Seneca and others. In Seneca certainly, and perhaps something of it in Epictetus; but it is not in Antoninus. MARCUS AURELIUS FROM ‘SEEKERS AFTER GOD, BY Eev. F. W. FAEEAE, D.D., F.E.S., Canon of Westminster. MARCUS AURELIUS. CHAPTER I. THE EDUCATION OF AN EMPEEOR. The life of the noblest of Pagan Emperors may well follow that of the noblest of Pagan slaves. Their g/ory shines the purer and brighter from the midst ot a cor- rupt and deplorable society. Epictetus showed that a Phrygian slave could live a life of the loftiest exalta- tion; Aurelius proved that a Roman Emperor could live a life of the deepest humility. The one — a for- eigner, feeble, deformed, ignorant, boim in squalor, bred in degradation, the despised chattel of a despicable freedman, surrounded by every depressing, ignoble, and pitiable circumstance of life — showed how one who seemed born to be a wretch could win noble hap- piness and immortal memory ; the other — a Roman, a patrician, strong, of heavenly beauty, of noble ances- tors, almost born to the purple, the favorite of Emper- ors, the greatest conqueror, the greatest philosopher, the greatest ruler of his time — proved forever that it is possible to be virtuous, and tender, and holjq and contented in the midst of sadness, even on an irrespon- sible and imperial throne. Strange that, of the two, the Emperor is even sweeter, more simple, more ad- 74 ESSAY OiV MAMCUS AURELIUS. mirable, more humbly and touchingly resigned, than the slave. In him, Stoicism loses all its haughty self- assertion, all its impracticable paradox, for a manly melancholy which at once troubles and charms the heart. “ It seems,” says M. Martha, “ that in him the philosophy of heathendom grows less proud, draws nearer and nearer to a Christianity which it ignored or which it despised, and is ready to fling itself into the arms of the ‘Unknown God.’ In the sad Meditations of Aurelius we And a pure serenity, sweetness, and docility to the commands of God, which before him were unknown, and which Christian grace has alone surpassed. If he has not yet attained to charity in all that fullness of meaning which Christianity has given to the word, he has already gained its unction, and one cannot read his book, unique in the history of Pagan philosophy, without thinking of the sadness of Pascal and the gentleness of Fenelon. We must pause before this soul, so lofty and so pure, to contemplate ancient virtue in its softest brilliancy, to see the moral delicacy to which profane doctrines have attained — how they laid down their pride, and how penetrating a grace they have found in their new simplicity. To make the example yet more striking. Providence, which, accord- ing to the Stoics, does nothing by chance, determined that the example of these simple virtues should bloom in the midst of all human grandeur — that charity should be taught by the successor of blood-stained Caesars, and humbleness of heart by an Emperor.” Aurelius has always exercised a powerful fascination over the minds of eminent men. “ If you set aside, for a moment, the contemplation of the Christian veri- ties,” says the eloquent and thoughtful Montesquieu, BT CANON FARRAR. 75 “ search throughout all nature, and you will not find a grander object than the Antonines. . . . One feels a secret pleasure in speaking of this Emperor ; one cannot read his life without a softening feeling of emotion. He produces such an effect upon our minds that we think better of ourselves, because he inspires us with a better opinion of mankind.” “ It is more delightful,” says the great historian, Niebuhr, to speak of Marcus Aurelius than of any man in history; for if there is any sublime human virtue it is his. He was certainly the noblest character of his time, and I know no other man who combined such unaffected kindness, mildness, and humility, with such conscientiousness and severity toward himself. We possess innumerable busts of him, for every Roman of his time w'as anxious to possess his portrait, and if there is anywhere an ex- pression of virtue it is in the heavenly features of Marcus Aurelius.” Marcus Aurelius was born on April 26, a. d. 121. His more correct designation would be Marcus Anton- inus, but since he bore several different names at dif- ferent periods of his life, and since at that age nothing was more common than a change of designation, it is hardly worth while to alter the name by which he is most popularly recognized. His father, Annius Yerus, who died in his Prmtorship, drew his blood from a line of illustrious men who claimed descent from Numa, the second King of Rome. His mother, Domitia Cal- villa, was also a lady of consular and kingly race. The character of both seems to have been worthy of their high dignity. Of his father he can have known little, since Annius died when Aurelius was a mere infant ; but in his Meditations he has left us a grateful 76 ESSA Y ON MARCUS A UR ELI US. memorial of both his parents. He says that from his grandfather he learned (or, might have learned) good morals and the government of his temper ; from the reputation and remembrance of his father, modesty and manliness ; from his mother, piety, and benefi- cence, and abstinence not only from evil deeds., but even from evil thoughts ; and, further, simplicity of life far removed from the habits of the rich. The childhood and boyhood of Aurelius fell during the reign of Hadrian. The times were better than those which we have contemplated in the reigns of the Caesars. After the suicide of Nero and the brief reigns of Galba and Otho, the Roman world had breathed more freely for a time under the rough good humor of Ves- pasian and the philosophic virtue of Titus. The reign of Domitian, indeed, who succeeded his brother Titus, was scarcely less terrible and infamous than that of Caius or of Nero ; but that prince, shortly before his murder, had dreamed that a golden neck had grown out of his own, and interpreted the dream to indicate that a better race of princes should follow him. The dream was fulfilled. Whatever may have been their other faults, Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, were wise and kind-hearted rulers ; Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aure- lius were among the very gentlest and noblest sovereigns whom the world has ever seen. Hadrian, though an able, indefatigable, and, on the whole, beneficial Emperor, was a man whose charac- ter was stained with serious faults. It is, however, greatly to his honor that he recognized in Aurelius, at the early age of six years, the germs of those extra- ordinary virtues which afterward blessed the empire and elevated the sentiments of mankind, “ Hadrian’s B7 CANON FABBAR. 77 held and sinful habits left him,” says ISTiebuhr, “ when he gazed on the sweetness of that innocent child. Playing on the bo^^’s paternal name of Verus, he called him Yerissimus, ‘ the most true.’ ” It is inter- esting to find that this trait of character was so early developed in one who thought that all men “should speak as they think, with an accent of heroic verity.” Toward the end of his long reign, worn out with disease and weariness, Hadrian, being childless, had adopted as his son L. Ceionius Commodus, a man who had few recommendations but his personal beauty. Upon his death, wdiich took place a year afterward, Hadrian, assembling the senators round his sick bed, adopted and presented to them as their future Emperor Arrius Antoninus, better known by the surname of Pius, which he won by his gratitude to the memory of his predecessor. Had Aurelius been older — he was then but seventeen — it is known that Hadrian would have chosen him, and not Antoninus, for his heir. The latter, indeed, who w^as then fifty two years old, was only selected on the express condition that he should in turn adopt both Marcus Aurelius and the son of the deceased Ceionius. Thus, at the age of seventeen, Aurelius, who, even from his infancy, had been loaded with conspicuous distinctions, saw himself the ac- knowledged heir to the empire of the world. We are happily able, mainly from his own writings, to give some sketch of the influences and the educa- tion which had formed him for this exalted station. He was brought up in the house of his grandfather, a man who had been three times consul. He makes it a matter of congratulation and thankfulness to the gods, that he had not been sent to any public school. 78 BSSA T ON MABCU8 A UBELIU8. Avhere he would have run the risk of being tainted by that frightful corruption into which, for many years, the Roman youth had fallen. He expresses a sense of obligation to his great-grandfather for having supplied him with good teachers at home, and for the conviction that on such things a man should spend liberally. There was nothing jealous, barren, or illiberal, in the training he received. He was fond of boxing, wrest- ling, running ; he was an admirable player at ball, and he was fond of the perilous excitement of hunting the wild boar. Thus, his healthy sports, his serious studies, his moral instruction, his public dignities and duties, all contributed to form his character in a beautiful and manly mold. There are, however, three respects in which his education seems especially worthy of notice ; I mean the diligence, the gratitude, and the hardiness in which he was encouraged by others, and which he practiced with all the ardor of generous conviction. 1. In the best sense of the word, Aurelius was dili- gent. He alludes more than once in his Meditations to the inestimable value of time, and to his ardent desire to gain more leisure for intellectual jnirsuits. He flung himself with his usual undeviating steadfastness of purpose into every branch of study, and though he deliberately abandoned rhetoric, he toiled hard at philosophy, at the discipline of arms, at the adminis- tration of business, and at the difficult study of Roman jurisprudence. One of the acquisitions for which he ex]U’esses gratitude to his tutor Rusticus, is that of reading carefully, and not being satisfied with the superlicial understanding of a book. In fact, so stren- uous was his labor, and so great his abstemiousness, that his health suffered by the combination of the two. BY CANON FABRAR. 79 2. His opening remarks show that he remembered all his teachers — even the most insignificant — with sincere gratitude. He regarded each one of them as a man from whom something could be learned, and from whom he actually did learn that something. Hence the honorable respect — a respect as honorable to him- self as to them — which he paid to Fronto, to Husticus, to Julius Proculus, and others whom his noble and conscientious gratitude raised to the highest dignities of the State. He even thanks the gods that “ he made haste to place those who brought him up in the station of honor which they seemed to desire, without putting them off with mere hojpes of his doing it some time after, because they were then still young.” He Avas far the superior of these men, not only socially but even morally and intellectually ; yet from the height of his exalted rank and character he delighted to asso- ciate Avith them on the most friendly terms, and to treat them, even till his death, with affection and honor, to place their likenesses among his household gods, and visit their sepulchres with wreaths and victims. 3. His hardiness and self-denial were perhaps still more remarkable. I Avish that those boys of our day, Avho think it undignified to travel second-class, Avho dress in the extreme of fashion, wear roses in their button-holes, and spend upon ices and strawberries Avhat would maintain a poor man for a year, w'ould learn how infinitely more noble Avas the abstinence of this young Roman, Avho though born in the midst of splendor and luxury, learned from the first to loathe the petty vice of gluttony, and to despise the un man- liness of self-indulgence. Very early in life he joined 80 £:SSA r ON MARCUS A URELIUS. the giorious fellowship of those who esteem it not only a duty but a pleasure “ To scorn delights, and live laborious days, ■’ and had learned “endurance of labor, and to want little, and to Avork Avith his o\Am hands.” In his eleventh year he become acquainted AA^ith Diognetus, Avho first introduced hi}n to the Stoic philosophy, and in his twelfth year he assumed the Stoic dress. This philosophy taught him “ to prefer a plank bed and skin, and Avhatever else of tlie kind belongs to the Grecian discipline.” It is said that “ tlie skin ” Avas a concession to the entreaties of his mother, and that the young philosopher himself Avould have chosen to sleep on the bare boards or on the ground. Yet he acted thus without self-assertion and Avithout ostentation. His friends found him ahvays cheerful; and his calm features — in Avhich a dignity and thoughtfulness of spirit contrasted AAuth the bloom and beauty of a pure and honorable boyhood — Avere never overshadoAved Avith ill-temper or Avith gloom. The guardians of Marcus Aurelius had gathered around him all the most distinguished literary teachers of the age. Never had a prince a greater number of eminent instructors ; never Avere any teachers made happy by a more grateful, a more humble, a more blameless, a more truly royal and glorious pupil. Long years after his education had ceased, during his cam- paign among the Quadi, he wrote a sketch of what he OAved to them. This sketch forms the first book of his Meditations^, and is characterized throughout by the most unaffected simplicity and modesty. The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius were, in fact, BT CANON FARBAR. 81 his private diary ; they are a noble soliloquy with his own heart, an honest exa*uiination of his own con- science ; there is not the slightest trace of their having been intended for any eye but his own. In them he was acting on the principle of St. Augustine : “ Go up into the tribunal of thy conscience, and set thyself before thyself.” He was ever bearing about — “ A silent court of justice in himself, Himself the judge and jury, and himself The prisoner at the bar,” And writing amid all the cares and distractions of a war which he detested, he averted his eyes from the manifold weariness which daily vexed his soul, and calmly sat down to meditate on all the great qualities which he had observed, and all the good lessons that he might have learned from those who had instructed his boyhood, and surrounded his manly years. And what had he learned? — learned heartily to admire, and {we may say) learned to practice also ? A sketch of his first book will show us. What he had gained from his immediate parents we have seen already, and we will make a brief abstract of his other obligations. From “his governor” — to which of his teachers this name applies we are not sure — he had learned to avoid factions at the races, to work hard, and to avoid list- ening to slander ; from Diognetus, to despise frivolous superstitions, and to practice self-denial ; from Apoll- onius, undeviating steadiness of purpose, endurance of misfortune, and the reception of favors without being humbled by them ; from Sextus of Chaeronea (a grand- son of the celebrated Plutarch), tolerance of the igno- rant, gravity without affectation, and benevolence of 82 ESS A Y ON MARCUS A UEELIUS. heart ; from Alexander, delicacy in correcting others ; from Severus, “a disposition to do good, and to give to others readily, and to cherish good hope, and to believe that I am beloved of my friends;” from Maxi- mus, “sweetness and dignity, and to do what was set before me without complaining from Alexander the Platonic, “ not frequently to say to any one,, nor to write in a letter, that I ham no leisure / nor continually to excuse the neglect of ordinary duties by alleging urgent occupations.” To one or two others his obligations were. still more cliaracteristic and important. From Eusticus, for in- stance, an excellent and able man, whose advice for years he was accustomed to respect, he had learned to despise sophistry and disjday, to write with simplicity, to be easily pacified, to be accurate, and — an inesti- mable benefit this, and one which tinged the color of his whole life — to become acquainted with the Dis- courses of Epictetus. And from his adoptive father, the great Antoninus Pius, he had derived advantages still more considerable. In him he saAV the example of a sovereign and statesman firm, self-controlled, modest, faithful, and even tempered ; a man who de- spised flattery and hated meanness ; who honored the wise and distinguished the meritorious ; who was in- different to contemptible trifles, and indefatigable in earnest business ; one, in short, “ who had a perfect and invincible soul,” who, like Socrates, “was able both to abstain from and to enjo}" those things which many are too weak to abstain from and cannot enjoy without excess.”* Piety, serenity, sweetness, disre- * My quotations from Marcus Aurelius will be made (by permis- sion) from the forcible and admirably accurate translation of Mr. BT CANON FABBAB. 83 gard of empty fame, calmness, simplicity, patience, are virtues which he attributes to him in another full- length portrait (vi. 30) which he concludes with the words, “Imitate all this, that thou mayest have as good a conscience when thy last hour comes as he had.” He concludes these reminiscences of thankfulness with a summary of what he owed to the gods. And for what does he thanks the gods ? for being wealthy, and noble, and an emperor ? A”ay, for no vulgar or dubious blessings such as these, but for the guidance which trained him in philosophy, and for the grace which kept him from sin. And here it is that his genuine modesty comes out. As the excellent divine used to say when he saw a criminal led past for execu- tion, “There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford,” so, after thanking the gods for the good- ness of all his family and relatives, Aurelius says, “ Further, I owe it to the gods that I was not hurried into any offense against any of them, though I had a disposition which, if opportunity had offered, might have led me to do something of this kind ; but through their favor there never was such a concurrence of cir- cumstances as put me to the trial. Further, that I was subjected to a ruler and father who took away all pride from me, and taught me that it was possible to live in a palace without guards, or embroidered dresses, or torches, and statues, and such-like show, but to live very near to the fashion of a private person, without being either mean in thought or remiss in action ; that after having fallen into amatory passions I was cured ; Long. In thanking Mr. Long, I may be allowed to add that the English reader will find in his version the best means of becoming acquainted with the purest and noblest book of antiquity. 84 SSSA r ON MARCUS A URULIUS. that though it was my mother’s fate to die young, she spent the last years of her life with me ; that when- ever I washed to help any man, I was never told that I had not the means of doing it ; that I had abundance of good masters for my children : for all these things require the help of the gods and fortune.” The whole of the Emperor’s Meditations deserve the profound study of this age. The self-denial which they display is a rebuke to our ever-growing luxury ; their generosity contrasts favorably wdth the increasing bitterness of our cynicism; their contented acqui- escence in God’s will rebukes our incessant restless- ness ; above all, their constant elevation shames that multitude of little vices, and little meannesses, which lie like a scurf over the conventionality of modern life. But this earlier chapter has also a special value for the young. It offers a picture which it would indeed be better for them and for us if they could be induced to study. If even under “ That fierce light that beats upon the throne,” the life of Marcus Aurelius shows no moral stain, it is still more remarkable that the free and beautiful boy- hood of this Roman prince had early learned to recog- nize only the excellences of his teachers, their patience and firmness, their benevolence and sweetness, their integrity and virtue. Amid the frightful universality of moral corruption he preserved a stainless conscience and a most pure soul ; he thanked God in language which breathes the most crystalline delicacy of senti- ment and language, that he had preserved uninjured the flower of his early life, and that under the calm influences of his home in the country, and the studies BT CANON FARRAR. 85 of philosophy, he had learned to value chastity as the sacred girdle of youth, to be retained and honored to his latest years. “ Surely,” says Mr. Carlyle, “ a day is coming when it will be known again what virtue is in purity and continence of life ; how divine is the blush of young human cheeks ; how high, beneficent, sternly inexorable is the duty laid on every creature in regard to these particulars. Well, if such a day never come, then I perceive much else will never come. Magnanimity and depth of insight will never come ; heroic purity of heart and of eye ; noble pious valor to amend us, and the age of bronze and lacquers, how can they ever come ? The scandalous bronze-lacquer age of hungry animalisms, spiritual impotencies, and mendacities will have to run its course till the pit swallow it.” 86 ESSA Y OE MARCUS A URELIU8. CHAPTER II. THE LIFE AND THOUGHTS OF MAECUS AUKELIUS. On the death of Hadrian in a. d. 138, Antoninus Pius succeeded to the throne, and, in accordance with the late Emperor’s conditions, adopted Marcus Aure- lius and Lucius Coinmodus. Marcus had been be- trothed at the age of fifteen to the sister of Lucius Coinmodus, but the new Emperor broke, off the en- gagement, and betrothed him instead to his daughter Faustina. The marriage, however, was not celebrated till seven years afterward, a. d. 1-16. The long reign of Antoninus Pius is one of those happy periods that have no history. An almost un- broken peace reigned at home and abroad. Taxes were lightened, calamities relieved, informers discour- aged ; confiscations were rare, plots and executions were almost unknown. Throughout the whole extent of his v^ast domain the people loved and valued their Em- peror, and the Emperoi'’s one aim was to further the happiness of his people. He, too, like Aurelius, had learned that what was good for the bee was good for the hive. He strove to live as the civil administrator of an unaggressive and united republic ; he disliked war, did not value the military title of Imperator, and never deigned to accept a triumph. With this wise and eminent prince, who was as amiable in his private relations as he was admirable in BY CANON FARRAR. 87 the discharge of his public duties, Marcus Aurelius spent the next twenty-three years of his life. So close and intimate was their union, so completely did they regard each other as father and son, that during all that period Aurelius never slept more than twice away from the house of Antoninus. There was not a shade of jealousy between them; each was the friend and adviser of the other, and, so far from regarding his destined heir with suspicion, the emperor gave him the designation “Cmsar,” and heaped upon him ah. the honors of the Roman Commonwealth. It was in vain that the whisper of malignant tongues attempted to shake this mutual confidence. Antoninus once saw the mother of Aurelius in earnest prayer before the statue of Apollo. “ What do you think she is praying for so intently?” asked a wretched mischief-maker of the name of Valerius Omulus-: “ It is that you may die, and her son reign.” This wicked suggestion might have driven a prince of meaner character into violence and disgust, but Antoninus passed it over with the silence of contempt. It was the main delight of Antoninus to enjoy the quiet of his country villa. Unlike Hadrian, who tra- versed immense regions of his vast dominion, Antoninus lived entirely either at Rome, or in his beautiful villa at Lorium, a little sea-coast village about twelve miles from the capital. In this villa he had been born, and here he died, surrounded by the reminiscences of his childhood. In this his real home it was his special pleasure to lay aside the pomp and burden of his imperial rank. “ He did not,” says Marcus, “ take the bath at unseasonable hours ; he was not fond of build- ing houses, nor curious about what he eat, nor about 88 ESSAY ON MARCUS A URELIUS. the texture and color of his clothes, nor about the beauty of his slaves.” Even the dress he wore was the Avork of the provincial artist in his little native place. So far from checking the philosophic tastes of his adopted son he fostered them, and sent for Apollonius of Chalcisto be his teacher in the doctrines of Stoicism. In one of his notes to Fronto, Marcus draws the picture of their simple country occupations and amusements. Hunting, fishing, boxing, wrestling, occupied the leisure of the tAvo princes, and they shared the rustic festivities of the vintage. “ I have dined,” he Avrites, “ on a little bread. . . . We perspired a great deal, shouted a great deal, and left some gleanings of the vintage hanging on the trellis Avork. . . . When I got home I studied a little, but not to much advantage I had a long talk Avith my mother, Avho was lying on her couch.” Who knoAvs hoAV much Aurelius and hoAV much the Avorkl may haAm gained from such conversa- tion as this Avith a mother from AAdiom he had learned to hate even the thought of evil? Hor Avill anyone despise the simplicity of heart Avhich made him mingle AAuth the peasants as an amateur vintager, unless he is so tasteless and so morose as to think Avith scorn of Scipio and Laelius as they gathered shells on the sea- shore, or of Henry IV as he plajmd at horses Avith his little boys on all-fours. The capability of unbending thus, the genuine cheerfulness Avhich enters at due times into simple amusements, has been found not rarely in the highest and purest minds. For many years no incident of importance broke the even tenor of Aurelius’ life. He lived peaceful, happy, prosperous, and beloved, Avatching without envy the increasing years of his adopted father. But in the BT CANON FARRAR. 89 year 161, when Marcus was now forty years old, Antoninus Pius, who had reached the age of seventy- five, caught a fever at Lorium. Feeling that his end was near, he summoned his friends and the chief men of Eome to his bedside, and there (without saying a word about his other adopted son, who is generally known by the name of Lucius Yerus) solemnly recom- mended Marcus to them as his successor ; and then, giving to the captain of the guard the watchword of “ Equanimit\^,” as though his earthly task was over, he ordered to be transferred to the bedroom of Marcus the little golden statue of Fortune, which Avas kept in the private chamber of the emperors as an omen of public prosperity. The very first public act of the new Emperor Avas one of splendid generosity, namely, the admission of his adoptive brother Lucius Yerus into the fullest partici- pation of imperial honors, the Tribunitian and procon- sular poAvers, and the titles Caesar and Augustus. The admission of Lucius Yerus to a share of the empire Avas due to the innate modesty of Marcus. As he Avas a devoted student, and cared less for manly exercises, in Avhich Yerus excelled, he thought that his adoptive brother Avould be a better and more useful general than himself, and that he could best serve the State by retaining the civil administration, and entrusting to his brother the management of Avar. Yerus, how- ever, as soon as he got away from the immediate influ- ence and ennobling society of Marcus, broke loose from all decency, and shoAved himself to be a Aveak and Avorthless personage, as unfit for war as he Avas for all the nobler duties of peace, and capable of noth- ing but enormous gluttony and disgraceful self-indul- 90 ESSAY ON MARCUS AURELIUS. g'ence. Two things only can be said in his favor : the one, that, though depraved, he was wholly free from cruelty; and the other, that he had the good sense to submit himself entirely to his brother, and to treat him with the gratitude and deference which were his due. IMarcus had a large family by Faustina, and in the first 3^ear of his reign his wife bore twins, of whom the one who survived became the wicked and detested Emperor Commodus. As though the birth of such a child were in itself an omen of ruin, a storm of calam- ity began at once to burst over the long tranquil State. An inundation of the Tiber flung down houses and streets over a great part of Eome, swept awa}’^ multi- tudes of cattle, spoiled the harvests, devastated the fields, and caused a distress which ended in wide- spread famine. Men’s minds were terrified by earth- quakes, by the burning of cities, and by plagues or noxious insects. To these miseries, which the Em- perors did their best to alleviate, was added the hor- rors of wars and rumors of wars. The Partians, under their king, Vologeses, defeated and all but destroyed a Roman army, and devastated with impunity the Roman province of Syria. The wild tribes of the Catti burst over Germany with fire and sword ; and the news from Britain was full of insurrection and tumult. Such \vere the elements of trouble and discord which overshadowed the reign of Marcus Aurelius from its very beginning down to its weary close. As the Partian war was the most important of the three, Yerus was sent to quell it, and but for the ability of his generals — the greatest of whom was Avidius Cassius — would have ruined irretrievably the BT CANON FARRAR. 91 fortunes of the Empire. These generals, however, vindicated the majesty of the Roman name, and Yerus returned in triumph, bringing back with him from the East the seeds of a terrible pestilence which devastated the whole Empire, and by which, on the outbreak of fresh wars, Yerus himself was carried off at Aquileia. Worthless as he was, Marcus, who in his lifetime had so often pardoned and concealed his faults, paid him the highest honors of sepulcre, and interred his ashes in the mausoleum of Hadrian. There were not wanting some who charged him with the guilt of frat- ricide, asserting that the death of Yerus had been has- tened by his means ! I have only one reason for alluding to atrocious and contemptible calumnies like these, and that is because — since, no doubt, such whispers reached his ears — they help to account for that deep, unutterable mel- ancholy which breathes through the little golden book of the Emperor’s Meditations. We find, for instance, among them this isolated fragment : “A black character, a womanish character, a stub- born character, bestial, childish, animal, stupid, coun- terfeit, scurrilous, fraudulent, tyrannical.” We know not of whom he was thinking — perhaps of Hero, perhaps of Caligula, but undoubtedly also of men whom he had seen and known, and Avhose very existence darkened his soul. The same sad spirit breathes also through the following passages ; “ Soon, very soon, thou wfilt be ashes, or a skeleton, and either a name or not even a name ; but name is sound and echo. And the things which are much valued in life are empty, and rotten, and trifling, and little dogs hiting one another and little child/ren guar- 92 ESSA Y OJY MABCUS A UBELl US. rding, laughing.^ and then straightway weeping. Bui fidelity., and modesty, o/nd justice and truth are fied “ ‘ Up to 01ympu.s from the wide-spread earth.’ ” (v. 33.) “ It would be a man’s happiest lot to depart from mankind without having had a taste of lying, and hypocrisy, and luxury, and pride. However, to breathe Old one's life when a man has had enough of those things is the next best voyage, as the saying is ” (ix. 2). ^'■Enough of this wretched life, and murmuring, and apish trifles. Why art thou thus disturbed ? What is there new in this? What unsettles thee? . . . Towards the gods, then, now become at last more simple and better ” (ix. 37). The thought is like that which dominates through the Penitential Psalms of David — that we may take refuge from men, their malignity, and their meanness, and find rest for our souls in God. From men David has ^uhope; mock- ery, treachery, injustice, are all that he expects from them — the bitterness of his enemies, the far-off indiffer- ence of his friends. Hor does this greatly trouble him, so long as he does not wholly lose the light of God's countenance. “I had no place to fiee unto, and no man cared for my soul. I cried unto thee, O Lord, and said. Thou art my hope, and my portion in the land of the living.” “ Cast me not aAvay from Thy presence, and take not Thy Holy Spirit from me.” But Avhatever may have been his impulse at times to give up in despair all attempt to improve the “ little breed " of men around him, Marcus had schooled his gentle spirit to live continually in far other feelings. Were men contemptible? It was all the more reason Avhy he should himself be noble. Were men petty, BY CANON F ARRAU. 93 and malignant, and passionate, and unjust ? In that proportion were they all the more marked out for pity and tenderness, and ia that proportion was he bound to the utmost of his ability to show himself great, and forgiving, and calm, and true. Thus Marcus turns his very bitterest experience to gold, and from the vile- ness of others, which depressed his lonely life, so far from suffering himself to be embittered as well as saddened, he only draws fi’esh lessons of humanit}’' and love. He sa3^s, for instance, “ Begin the morning by sa}dng to thj^self, 1 shall meet loith the husylody, the tmgmte- ful, arrogant, deceitful, envious, 'unsocial. All these things happen to them l>y reason of their ignorance of 'what is good and evil. But I who have seen the nature of the good that it is beautiful, and of the bad that it is ugly, and the nature of him that does wrong that is akin to me, . . . and that it partakes of the same portion of the divinity, I can neither be injured by any of them, for no one can fix on me what is ugly, nor can I be angrv with m}'' kinsman, nor hate him. For 'we are made for co operation, like feet, like hands, like eyelids, like the rows of the upper and lower teeth. To act against one another then is con- trary to nature ; and it is acting against one another to be vexed and turn away ” (ii. 1). Another of his rules, and an eminently wise one, was to fix his thoughts as much as possible on the virtues of others, rather than on their vices. “ When thou wishest to delight thyself, think of the virtues of those who live Avith thee — the activity of one, the modesty of another, the liberality of a third, and some other good qualitA’' of a fourth.” What a rebuke to the contemptuous 94 ESSAY OJSr MARCUS A UBELIUS. cynicism which we are daily tempted to display ! ‘‘An. infinite being comes before us,’^ says Eobertson, “ with a whole eternity wrapped up in his mind and soul, and we proceed to classify liim,p\d a label ujoon him, as we would upon a jar, saying. This is rice, that is jelly, and this pomatum / and then Ave think we have saved our- selves the necessity of taking off the coA^er. Hoav differently our Lord treated the people who came to Him ! . . . consequently, at His touch each one gave out his peculiar spark of light.” Here, again, is a singularly pithy, comprehensive, and beautiful piece of ad\dce : — “ Men exist for the sake of one another. Teach them or hear with them ” (viii. 59). And again : “ The best Avay of avenging thyself is not to become like the Avrong doer.” And again, “ If any man has done Avrong, the harm is his OAvn. But perhaps he has not done Avrong ” (ix. 38). Most remarkable, hoAvever, are the nine rules which he drew up for himself, as subjects for reflection Avhen any one had offended him, viz. : 1. That men Avere made for each other : even the inferior for the sake of the superior, and these for the sake of one another. 2. The invincible influences that act upon men, and mold their opinions and their acts. 3. That sin is mainly error and ignorance — an invol- untary slavery. 4. That we are ourselves feeble, and by no means immaculate ; and that often our very abstinence from faults is due more to coAvardice and a care for our reputation than to any freedom from the disposition to commit them. BT CANON FARBAR. 95 5. That our judgments are apt to be very rash and premature. “ And in short a man must learn a great deal to enable him to pass a correct judgment on another man’s acts.” 6. When thou art much vexed or grieved, consider that man’s life is only a moment, and after a short time we are all laid out dead. 7. That no wrongful act of another can bring shame on us, and that it is not men’s acts which disturb us, but our own opinions of them. 8. That our own anger hurts us more than the acts themselves. 9. That henevolenee is invincible, if it be not an affected smile, nor acting a part. “For what will the most violent man do to thee if thou continuest benevo- lent to him? gently and calmly correcting him, ad- monishing him when he is trying to do thee harm, saying, '■Not so, my child: we are constituted by nature for something else: I shall certainly not be injured, but thou art injuring thyself, my child.’’ And show him with gentle tact and by general principles that this is so, and that even bees do not do as he does, nor any gregarious animal. And this you must do simply, unreproachfully, affectionately ; without rancor, and if possible when you and he are alone” (xi. 18). '■‘■Not so, my child; thou art injuring thyself, my child.” Can all antiquity show anything tenderer than this, or anything more close to the spirit of Christian teaching than these nine rules ? They were worthy of the men who, unlike the Stoics in general, considered gentleness to be a virtue, and a proof at once of philosophy and of true manhood. They are written with that effusion of sadness and benevolence to which it is difficult to find a parallel. They show 96 ESSA r ON Af ARGUS A URELIUS. how completely Marcus had triumphed over all petty malignity, and how earnestly he strove to fulfill his own precept of alwa3^s keeping the thoughts so sweet and clear, that “ if any one should suddenly ask, ‘What hast thou now in thy thoughts ? with perfect openness thou niightest immediately answer, ‘ This or that.’ ” In short, to give them their highest pi’aise, they would have delighted the great Christian Apostle who wrote : “Warn them that they are unruly, comfort the feeble-minded, support the weak, be patient toward all men. See that none render evil for evil unto any man ; but ever follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all men ” (1 Thess. iv. 14, 15). “ Count him not as an enemy, but admonish him as a brother” (2 Thess. iv. 15). “ Forbearing one anotlier, and forgiving one another, if any man have a quarrel against any ” (Col. iii. 13). Nay, are they not even in full accordance Avith the mind and spirit of Him who said : “ If thy brother tres]>ass against thee, go and tell him his fault hetioeen thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee thou hast gained thy hrotherP In the life of Marcus Aurelius, as in so many liA^es, Ave are able to tra,ce the great laAV of compensation. Ilis exalted station, during the later years of his life, threAV him among many Avho Avere false and Phari- saical and base ; but his youth had been spent under happier conditions, and this saved him from falling into the sadness of those whom neither man nor Avoman please. In his earlier years it had been his lot to see the fairer side of humanity, and the recollection of tliose pure and hajApy days was like a healing tree throAvn into the bitter and turbid waters of his reign. BT CANON FARRAR. 97 CHAPTER III. THE LIFE AND THOUGHTS OF MARCUS AURELIUS {con- tinued). Marcus was now the undisputed lord of the Roman world. He was seated on the dizziest and most splendid eminence which it was possible for human grandeur to obtain. But this imperial elevation kindled no glow of pride or self-satisfaction in his meek and chastened nature. He regarded himself as being in fact the servant of all. It was his duty, like that of the bull in the herd, or the ram among the flocks, to confront every peril in his own person, to be foremost in all the hardships of war and the most deeply immersed in all the toils of peace. The registry of the citizens, the suppression of litigation, the elevation of public morals, the restrain- ing of consanguineous marriages, the care of minors, tlie retrenchment of public expenses, the limitation of gladiatorial games and shows, the care of roads, the restoration of senatorial privileges, the appointment of none but worthy magistrates, even the regulation of street traffic — these and numberless other duties so completely absorbed his attention that, in spite of in- different health, they often kept him at severe labor from early morning till long after midnight. His posi- tion indeed often necessitated his presence at games and shows, but on these occasions he occupied himself 98 ESSAY ON MARCUS AURRLIUS. either in reading, or being read to, or in writing notes. He was one of those who held that nothing should be done hastily, and that few crimes were worse than the waste of time. It is to such views and such habits that we owe the compositions of his works. His meditations were written amid the painful self-denial and distracting anxieties of his wars with the Quadi and the JVIarcomanni, and he was the author of other works which unhappily have perished. Perhaps of all the lost treasures of antiquity there are few which we should fe'el a greater wish to recover than the lost autobiography of this wisest of emperors and holiest of Pagan men. As for the external trappings of his rank — those gorgeous adjuncts and pompous circumstances which excite the wonder and envy of mankind — no man could have shown himself more indifferent to them. He recognized indeed the necessity of maintaining the dignity of his high position. “Every moment,” he says, “ think steadily as a Roman and a man to do what tho\i hast in hand with perfect and simple dignity ^ and affection, and freedom, and justice” (ii. 5); and again, “ Let the Deity which is in thee be the guardian of a living being, manly and of ripe age^ and engaged in matters political^ and a Roman, and a ruler, who has taken his post like a man waiting for the signal which summons him from life” (iii. 5). But he did not think it necessary to accept the fulsome honors and degi’ading adulations which were so dear to many of his predecessors. He refused tlie pompous blas- phemy of temples and altars, saying that for every true ruler the world was a temple, and all good men were priests. He declined as much as possible aU BT CANON NABBAB. golden statues and triumphal designations. All inevit- able luxuries and splendor, such as his public duties rendered indispensable, he regarded as a mere hollow show. Marcus Aurelius felt as deeply as our own Shakespeare seems to have felt the unsubstantiality, the fleeting evanescence of all earthly things ; he would have delighted in the sentiment that, “We are such, stuff As dreams are made on, and our little life Is rounded by a sleep. ” “ When we have meat before us,” he says, “ and such eatables, we receive the impression that this is the dead body of a fish, and this is the dead body of a bird, or of a pig ; and, again, that this Falerian is only a little grajpe-yuice, and this jyurjjle rohe some sheep's wool dyed with the hlood of a shell-fish: such then are these impressions, and they reach the things them- selves and penetrate them, and so we see what kind of things they are. Just in the same way . . . where there are things which appear most worthy of our approbation, we ought to lay them hare, and look at their worthlessness, and strip them of all the words by which they are exalted ” (vi. 13). “ What is worth being valued ? To be received with clapping of hands iNo. Neither must we value the clapping of tongues, for the praise wdiich comes from the many is a clapping of tongues ” (vi. 16). “Asia, Europe, are corners of the universe; all the sea is a drop in the universe ; Athos a little clod of the universe ; all the present time is a point in eternity. All things are little, changeable, perishable ” (vi. 36). 100 ES8A Y ON MARCUS A URELIUS. And to Marcus too, no less than to Shakespeare, it seemed that — “All tlie world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players;” for he writes these remarkable words : “ The idle business of show, plays on the stage, flocks of sheep, herds, exercises with spears, a hone cast to little dogs, a bit of bread in fish-ponds, laboring s of a/nts, and burden - carrying runnings about of frightened little mice, puppets pulled by strings — this is what life resembles. It is thy duty then, in the midst of such things, to show good humor, and not a proud air ; to understand, however, that every man is worth just so much as the things are worth about which he busies himself. In fact, the Court was to Marcus a burden ; he tells us himself that Philosophy was his mother. Empire only his stepmother ; it was only his repose in the one that rendered even tolerable to him the burdens of the other. Emperor as he was, he thanked the gods for having enabled him to enter into the souls of a Thrasea, an Helvidius, a Cato, a Brutus. Above all, he seems to have had a horror of ever becoming like some of his predecessors ; he writes : “ Take care that thou art not made into a Csesar ; * take care thou art not dyed -with this dye. Keep thy- self then simple, good, pure, serious, free from affecta- tion, a friend of justice, a worshipper of the gods, kind, affectionate, strenuous in all proper acts. Eever- ence the gods and help men. Short is life. There is * Marcus here invents what M. Martha justly calls “ an admir- able barbarism ” to express his disgust towards such men — opa pi] (X7tvHai8ao(aQ7]i — “ take care not to be Ccesarised.” B7 CANON FARRAR. 101 only one fruit of this terrene life / a jpious disposition and social acts ” (iv. 19). It is the same conclusion as that which sorrow forced from another weary and less admirable king : “ Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter : Fear God, and keep His commandments ; for this is the whole duty of man.” But it is time for us to continue the meager record of the life of Marcus, so far as the bare and gossiping compilations of Dion Cassius,* and Capitolinus, and the scattered allusions of other writers can enable us to do so. It must have been with a heavy heart that he set out once more for German}^ to face the dangerous rising of the Quadi and Marcomanni. To obtain sol- diers sufficient to fill up the vacancies in his army which had been decimated by the plague, he was forced to enroll slaves, and to obtain money he had to sell the ornaments of the palace, and even some of the Empress’ jewels. Immediately before he started his heart was wrung by the death of his little boy, the twin-brother of Commodus, whose beautiful features are still preserved for us on coins. Early in the war, as he was trying the depth of a ford, he was assailed by the enemy with a sudden storm of missiles, and was only saved from imminent death by being sheltered beneath the shields of his soldiers. One battle was fought on the ice of the wintry Danube. But by far the most celebrated event of the war took place in a great victory over the Quadi which he won in a. d. 174, and which was attributed by the Christians to * As epitomized by Xipbilinus. 1 02 E8SA T ON MARCUS A URELlUS. what is known as the “Miracle of the Thundering Legion.” Divested of all extraneous additions, the fact which occurred — as established bj the evidence of medals, and by one of the bassi-relievi on the “ Column of Antonine,” — appears to have been as follows. Marcus Aurelius and his army had been entangled in a mount- ain defile, into which they had too hastily pursued a sham retreat of the barbarian archers. In this defile, unable either to fight or to fly, pent in by the enemy, burnt up with the scorching heat and tormented by thirst, they lost all hope, burst into wailing and groans, and yielded to a despair from which not even the strenuous efforts of Marcus could arouse them. At the most critical moment of their danger and misery the clouds began to gather, and heavy showers of rain descended, which the soldiers caught in their shields and helmets to quench their own thirst and that of their horses. While they were thus engaged the enemy attacked them ; but the rain was mingled with hail, and fell with blinding fury in the faces of the barbarians. The storm was also accompanied with thunder and lightning, which seems to have damaged the enemy, and filled them with terror, while no casualty occurred in the Roman ranks. The Romans accordingly regarded this as a Divine interposition, and achieved a most decisive victory, which proved to be the practical conclusion of a hazardous and impor- tant war. The Christians regarded the event not 'providential hut as miracxdous, and attributed it to the prayers of their brethren in a legion which, from this circum- stance, received the name of the “ Thundering Legion.” BY CANON FARRAR. 103 It is, however, now known that one of the legions, distinguished by a flash of lightning which was rep- resented on their shields, had been known by this name since the time of Augustus ; and the Pagans themselves attributed the assistance which they had received sometimes to a prayer of the pious Emperor and sometimes to the incantations of an Egyptian sorcerer named Arnuphis. One of the Fathers, the passionate and eloquent Ter- tullian, attributes to this deliverance an interposition of the Emperor in favor of the Christians, and appeals to a letter of his to the Senate in which he acknowl- edged how effectual had been the aid he had received from Christian prayers, and forbade any one hereafter to molest the followers of the new religion, lest they should use against him the weapon of supplication Avhich had been so powerful in his favor. This letter is preserved at the end of the Apology of Justin Mar- tyr, and it adds that, not only are no Christians to be injured or persecuted, but that any one who informed against them is to be buried alive ! We see at once that this letter is one of those impudent and transpar- ent forgeries in which the literature of the first five centuries unhappily abounds. What was the real relation of Marcus to the Christians we shall consider hereafter. To the gentle heart of Marcus, all war, even when accompanied with victories, was eminently distasteful ; and in such painful and ungenial occujDations no small part of his life was passed. What he thought of war and of its successes is graphically set forth in the fol- lowing remark : “ A spider is proud when it has caught a fly, and an- 104 ESS A Y ON MARCUS A UBELIUS. other when he has caught a poor hare, and. another when he has taken a little fish in a net, and another Avhen he has taken wild boars or bears, and another when he has taken Sannatians. Are not these robbers, Avhen thou exaininest their principles ?” He here con- demns his OAYn involuntary actions ; but it was his un- happy destiny not to have trodden out the embers of this war before he was burdened with another far more painful and formidable. This Avas the revolt of Avidius Cassius, a general of the old blunt Homan type, whom, in spite of some ominous Avarnings, Marcus both loved and trusted. The ingratitude displayed by such a man caused Mar- cus the deepest anguish ; but he was saved from all dangerous consequences by the Avide-spread affection Avhich he had inspired by his virtuous reign. The very soldiers of the rebellious general fell away from him ; and, after he had been a nominal Emperor for only three months and six days, he Avas assassinated by some of his own officers. His head Avas sent to Marcus, who received it Avith sorrow, and did not hold out to the murderers the slightest encouragement. The joy of success Avas swallowed up in regret that his enemy had not lived to allow him the luxury of a genuine forgiveness. He begged the Senate to pardon all the family of Cassius, and to suffer this single file to be the only one forfeited in consequence of civil Avar. The Fathers received these proofs of clemency Avith the rapture which they deserved, and the Senate- house resounded with acclamations and blessings. Never had a formidable conspiracy been more quietly and effectually crashed. Marcus traveled through the provinces which had favored the cause of AAudius BT CANON FABRAB. 105 Cassius, and treated them all with the most complete and indulgent forbearance. When he arrived in Syria, the correspondence of Cassius was brought to him, and, with a glorious magnanimity of which history affords but few examples, he consigned it all to the flames unread. During this journey of pacification, he lost his wife Faustina, Avho died suddenly in one of the valleys of Mount Taurus. Histoiy, or the collection of anecdotes which at this period often passes as history, has assigned to Faustina a character of the darkest in- famy, and it has even been made a charge against Aurelius that he overlooked or condoned her offences. As far as Faustina is concerned, we have not much to say, although there is strong reason to believe that many of the stories told of her are scandalously exaggerated, if not absolutely false. Certain it is, that most of the imputations upon her memory rest on the malignant anecdotes recorded by Dion, who dearly loved every piece of scandal which degraded human nature. The specific charge brought against her of having tempted Cassius from his allegiance is wholly unsupported, even if it be not absolutely incompatible with what we find in her own extant letters ; and, finally, Marcus himself not onl}^ loved her tenderly, as the kind mother of his eleven children, but in his Meditations actually thanks the gods for having granted him “ such a wife, so obedient, so affectionate, and so simple.” No doubt Faustina was unworthy of her husband; but surely it is the glory and not the shame of a noble nature to be averse from jealousy and suspicion, and to trust others more deeply than they deserve. 106 mSA Y ON MARCUS A URELIUS. So blameless was the conduct of Marcus Aurelius that neither the malignity of contemporaries nor the spirit of posthumous scandal has succeeded in discover- ing any flaw in the extreme integrity of his life and })rinciples. But meanness will not be balked of its victims. The hatred of all excellence which made Caligula try to put down the memory of great men rages, though less opening in tlie minds of many. They delight to degrade human life into that dull and barren ]ilain “ in which every molehill is a mountain, and every thistle a fo’‘est-tree.” Great men are as small in their eyes as they are saitl to be in the eyes of their valets; and there are multitudes who, if they find “ Some stain or blemish in a name of note, Not grieving that their greatest are so small, Inflate themselves -with some insane delight. And judge all nature from her feet of clay. Without the will to lift their eyes, and see Her godlike head crown’d with spiritual Are, And touching other worlds.” This I suppose is the reason why, failing to drag down Marcus Aurelius from his moral elevation, some have attempted to assail his reputation because of the supposed vileness of Faustina and the actual depravity of Commodus. Of Faustina I have spoken already. Respecting Commodus, I tliink it sufficient to ask with Solomon : “ Who knoweth whether his son shall be a wise man or a fool?” Commodus was but nineteen when his father died ; for the first three years of his reign he ruled respectably and acceptably. Marcus Aurelius had left no effort untried to have him trained aright by the first teachers and the wisest men whom the age produced; and Herodian distinctly tells us BT CANON FARRAR. 107 that he had lived wtuously up to the time of his lather’s death. Setting aside natural affection alto- gether, and even assuming (as I should conjecture from one or two passages of his Meditation^ that Marcus had misgivings about his son, -would it have been eas}’', would it have been even possible, to set aside on gen- eral grounds a son who had attained to years of maturity? However this may be, if there are any who think it worth while to censure Marcus because, after all, Commodus turned out to be but “ a warped slip of wilderness,” their censure is hardly sufficiently discriminating to deserve the trouble of refutation. •‘But Marcus Aurelius cruelly persecuted the Chris- tians.” Let us briefly consider this charge. That persecutions took place in his reign is an undeniable fact, and is sufficiently evidenced by the Apologies of Justin Martyr, of Melito, Bishop of Sardis, of Athena- goras, and of Apollinarius, as well as by the Letter of the Church of Smyrna describing the martyrdom of Polycarp, and that of the Churches of Lyons and Vienne to their brethren in Asia Minor. It is fair, however, to mention that there is some documentary evidence on the other side ; Lactantius clearly asserts that under the reigns of those excellent princes who succeeded Homitian the Church suffered no violence from her enemies, and “ spread her hands toward the East and the West;” Tertnllian, writing but twenty years after the death of Marcus, distinctly says (and Eusebius quotes the assertion), that there were letters of the Emperor, in which he not only attributed his delivery among the Quadi to the prayers of Christian soldiers in the Thundering Legion,” but ordered any who informed against the Christians to be most 108 ESSA Y ON MARCUS A URELIU8. severely punished ; and at the end of the works of Justin Martyr is found a letter of similar purport, which is asserted to have been addressed by Marcus to the Senate of Rome. We may set aside these peremp- tory testimonies, we may believe that Tertullian and Eusebius were mistaken, and that the documents to which they referred were spurious; but this should make us also less certain about the prominent participa- tion of the Emperor in these persecutions. My own belief is (and it is a belief which could be supported by many critical arguments), that his share in causing them was almost infinitesimal. If those who love his memory reject the evidence of Fathers in his favor, they may be at least permitted to withhold assent from some of the assertions in virtue of which he is con- demned. Marcus in his Meditations alludes to the Christians once only, and then it is to make a passing complaint of the indifference to death, which appeared to him, as it appeared to Epictetus, to arise, not from any noble principles, but from mere obstinacy and perversity. That he shared the profound dislike with which Christians were regarded is very probable. That he was a cold-blooded and virulent persecutor is utterly unlike his whole character, essentially at variance with his habitual clemency, alien to the spirit which made him interfere in every possible instance to mitigate the severity of legal punishments, and may in short be regarded as an assertion which is altogether false. Who will believe that a man who, during his reign, built and dedicated but one single temple, and that a Temple to Beneficence ; that a man who so far from showing any jealousy respecting foreign religions BY CANON FABBAR. 109 allowed honor to be paid to them all ; that a man whose writings breathe on eveiy page the inmost spirit of philanthropy and tenderness, went out of his wa}'’ to join in a persecution of the most innocent, the most courageous, and the most inoffensive of his subjects ? The true state of the case seems to have been this. The deep calamities in which, during the whole reign of Marcus, the Empire was involved, caused widespread distress, and roused into peculiar fury the feelings of the provincials against men whose atheism (for such they considered it to be) had kindled the anger of the gods. This fury often broke out into paroxysms of popular excitement, which none but the firmest-minded governors were able to moderate or to repress. Marcus, when appealed to, simply let the existing law take its usual course. That law was as old as the time of Trajan. The young Pliny, Governor of Bithynia, had written to ask Trajan how he was to deal with the Christians, whose blamelessness of life he fully admitted, but whose doctrines, he said, had emptied the temples of the gods, and exasperated their wor- shipers. Trajan, in reply, had ordered that the Christians should not be sought for, but that, if they were brought before the governor, and proved to be contumacious in refusing to adjure their religion, they were then to be put to death. Hadrian and Pius Anto- ninus had continued the same policy, and Marcus Aure- lius saw no reason to alter it. But this law, which in quiet times might become a mere dead letter, might at more troubled periods be converted into a dangerous engine of persecution, as it was in the case of the venerable Poly carp, and in the unfortunate Churches 110 ESSAY ON MARCUS AURELIUS. of Lyons and Yienne. The Pagans believed that the reason why their gods were smiling in secret, — “ Looking over wasted lands, Blight and famine, plague and earthquake, roaring deeps and fiery sands, — Clanging fights, and flaming towns, and sinking ships, and praying hands, — was the unbelief and impiety of these hated Galileans, causes of offence which could only be expiated by the death of the guilt}\ “ Their enemies,” says Tertullian, “call aloud for the blood of the innocent, alleging this vain pretext for their hatred, that they believe the Christians to be the cause of every public misfortune. If the Tiber has overflowed its banks, or the Nile has not overflowed, if heaven has refused its rain, if famine or the plague has spread its ravages, the cry is imme- diate, ‘ The Christians to the lions.’ ” In the first three centuries the cry of “No Christianity” became at times as brutal, as violent, and as unreasoning as the cry of “No Popery” has often been in modern days. It was infinitely less disgraceful to Marcus to lend his ear to the one than it has been to some emi- nent modern statesmen to be carried away by the insensate fury of the other. To v.diat extent is Marcus Aurelius to be condemned for the martyrdoms which took place in his reign ? Not, I think, heavily or indiscriminately, or with vehe- ment sweeping censure. Common justice surely de- mands that Ave should not confuse the present with the past, or pass judgment on the conduct of the Emperor as though he were living in the nineteenth century, or as though he had been acting in full cognizance of the Gospels and the stories of the Saints. Wise and BY CANON FABRAB. Ill good men before him had, in their haughty ignorance, spoken of Christianity with execration and contempt. The philosophers who surrounded his throne treated it with jealousy and aversion. The body of the nation firmly believed the current rumors which charged its votaries with horrible midnight assemblies, rendered infamous by Thyestian banquets and the atrocities of nameless superstitions. These foul calumnies — these hideous charges of cannibalism and incest — were sup- ported by the reiterated perjury of slaves under tort- ure, which in that age, as well as long afterward, was preposterously regarded as a sure criterion of truth. Christianity in that day was confounded with a multi- tude of debased and foreign superstitions; and the Emperor in his judicial capacity, if he ever encountered Christians at all, was far more likely to encounter those who were unworthy of the name, than to be- come acquainted with the meek, unworldly, retiring virtues of the calmest, the holiest, and the best. When we have given their due weight to considerations such as these we shall be ready to pardon Marcus Aure- lius for having, in this matter, acted ignorantly, and to admit that in persecuting Christianity he may most honestly have thought that he was doing God service. The very sincerity of his belief, the conscien- tiousness of his rule, the intensity of his philanthropy, the grandeur of his own philosophical tenets, all con- spired to make him a worse enemy of the Church than a brutal Commodus or a disgusting Heliogabalus. And yet that there was not in him the propensity to persecute ; that these persecutions were for the most part spontaneous and accidental ; that they were in no measure due to his direct instigation, or in special 112 S:SSA T ON MARCUS A URELIU8. accordance with his desire, is clear from the fact that the mart^a’doms took place in Gaul and Asia Minor, not in Rome. There must have been hundreds of Christians in Rome, and under the very eye of the Emperor; nay, there were even multitudes of Christians in his own army ; yet we never hear of his having molested any of them. Melito, Bishop of Sardis, in addressing the Emperor, expresses a doubt as to whether he was really aAvare of the manner in which his Christian subjects were treated. Justin Martyr, in his Aj)ology, addresses him in terms of per- fect confidence and deep respect. In short he was in this matter “ blameless, but unfortunate.” It is painful to think that the venerable Poljxarp and the thoughtful Justin may have forfeited their lives for their principles, not only in the reign of so good a man, but even by virtue of his authority ; but we must be very uncharitable or very unimaginative if we can not readily believe that, though they had received the crown of martyrdom from his hands, the redeemed spirits of those great martyrs would have been the first to welcome this holiest of the heathen into the ]iresence of a Saviour whose Church he persecuted, but to whose indwelling Spirit his virtues were due, whom ignorantly and unconsciously he worshiped, and whom, had he ever heard of Him and known Him, he would have loved in his heart and glorified by the con- sistency of his noble and stainless life. The persecution of the Churches in Lyons and Vienne happened in a. d. 177. Shortly after this period fresh wars recalled the Emperor to the Horth. It is said that, in despair of ever seeing him again, the chief men of Rome entreated him to address them his BT CANON FARRAR. 113 farewell admonitions, and that for three days he dis- coursed to them on philosophical questions. When he arrived at the seat of war, victory again crowned his arms. But Marcus was now getting old, and he was worn out with the toils, trials, and travels of his long and weary life. He sunk under mental anxieties and bodily fatigues, and after a brief illness died in Pan- nonia, either at Vienna or Sirmium, on March 17, a. d. 180, in the fifty-ninth year of his age and the twentieth of his reign. Death to him was no calamit 3 ^ He was sadly aware that “ there is no man so fortunate that there shall not be by him when he is dying some who are pleased with what is going to happen. Suppose that he was a good and wise man, will there not be at least some one to say of him, ‘ Let us at last breathe freely, being relieved from this school-master. It is true that he was harsh to none of us, but I perceive that he tacitly condemns us.’ . . . Thou wilt consider this when thou art dying, and will depart more contentedly by refiecting thus : ‘ I am going away /Vum a life in which even my associates., on hehalf of whom I have striven., and cared, and prayed so much, themselves wish me to depart, hoping perchance to get some little advantage by it.’ Why then should a man cling to a longer stay here % Do not, however, for this reason go away less hindly disposed to them, hut preserving thy own char- acter, and continuing friendly, and benevolent, and hind.'’ And dreading death far less than he dreaded any departure from the laws of virtue, he exclaims, “ Come quickly, O Death, for fear that at last I should forget myself!” This utterance has been well com- pared to the language which Bossuet put into the 114 SSSAY ON MARCUS ATTRELWS. montli of a Christian soul ; “ O Death, th ou dost not trouble 11137- designs, thou accomplishest them. Haste, then, O favorable Death ! . . . N%mc DimittisN A nobler, a gentler, a purer, a sweeter soul — a soul less elated by prosperity, or more constant in adver- sity — a soul more fitted by virtue, and chastity, and self-denial to enter into the eternal peace, never passed into the presence of its Heavenly Father. We are not surprised that all, whose means permitted it, possessed themselves of his statues, and that they were to be seen for vears afterward among the household gods of heathen families, who felt themselves more hopeful and more happy from the glorious sense of possibility which was inspired by the memory of one who, in the midst of difiiculties, and breathing an atmosphere heavy with corruption, }^et showed himself so wise, so great, so good a man. 0 framed for nobler times and calmer beartsl 0 studious thinker, eloquent for truth! Philosopher, despising wealth and death, But patient, childlike, full of life and lovel BT CANON FARBAR. 115 CHAPTER lY. THE “meditations” OE MAKCUS AIJHELIUS. Empeeok as he was, Marcus Aurelius found himself in a hollow and troublous world ; but he did not give himself up to idle regret or querulous lamentations. If these sorrows and perturbations came from the gods, he kissed the hand that smote him ; “ he deliv- ered up his broken sword to Fate the conquerer with a humble and a manly heart.” In any case he had duties to do, and he set himself to perform them with a quiet heroism — zealously, conscientiously, even cheerfully. The principles of the Emperor are not reducible to the hard and definite lines of a philosophic system. But the great laws which guided his actions and molded his views of life were few and simple, and in his book of Meditations, which is merely his private diary written to relieve his mind amid all the trials of war and government, he recurs to them again and again. “ Plays, war, astonishment, torpor, slavery,” he says to himself, “ will wipe out those holy principles of thine ;” and this is why he committed those princi- ples to writing. Some of these I have already adduced, and others I proceed to quote, availing myself, as before, of the beautiful and scholar-like translation of Mr. George Long. All pain, and misfortune, and ugliness seemed to the 116 £:SSA Y ON MARCUS A URELIUS. Emperor to be most wisely regarded under a threefold aspect, namely, if considered in reference to the gods, as being due to laws beyond their control ; if consid- ered with reference to the nature of things, as being subservient and necessary; and if considered with reference to ourselves, as being dependent on the amount of indifference and fortitude with which we endure them. The following passages will elucidate these points of view : “The intelligence of the Universe is social. Accord- ingly it has made the inferior things for the sake of the superior, and it has fitted the superior to one another” (v. 30). “ Things do not touch the soul, for they are eternal, and remain immovable; but our perturbations come only from the opinion which is within. . . . The Universe is Transformation ; life is oj>inion^^ (iv. 3). “ To the jaundiced honey tastes bitter, and to those bitten by mad dogs water causes fear ; and to little children the ball is a fine thing. Why, then, am I angry? Dost thou think that a false opinion has less power than the bile in the jaundiced, or the poison in him who is bitten by a mad dog” (vi. 51) ? “ How easy it is to repel and to wipe away every impression which is troublesome and unsuitable, and immediately to be at tranquillity ” (v. 2). The passages in which Marcus speaks of evil as a relative thing — as being good in the making — the unripe and bitter bud of that which shall be hereafter a beautiful flower — although not expressed with per- fect clearness, yet indicate his belief that our view of evil things rises in great measure from our inability to BY CANON NABBAB. m perceive the great whole of which they are but sub- servient parts. “ All things,” he says “ come from that universal ruling power, either directly or by way of consequence. And accordingly the lion's gaping jaws, and that which is poisonous, and every hurtftd thing, as a thorn, as mud, are after-products of the grand and beautiful. Do not therefore imagine that they are of another kind from that which thou dost venerate, but form a just opinion of the source of all.” In another curious passage he says that all things which are natural and congruent with the causes which produce them have a certain beauty and attractiveness of their own ; for instance, the splittings and corruga- tions on the surface of bread when it has been baked. “ And again, figs when they are quite ripe gape open ; and in the ripe olives the very circumstances of their being near to rottenness adds a peculiar beauty to the fruit. And the ears of corn bending down, and the lion's eyebrows, and the foam which flows from the mouth of wild boars, and many other things — though they are far from being beautiful, if a man should ex- amine them severally — still, because they are conse- quent upon the things which are formed by nature, lielp to adorn them, and they please the mind ; so that if a man should have a feeling and deeper insight about the things found in the universe there is hardly one of those which follow by way of conseguence which will not seem to him to be in a manner disposed so as to give pleasure ” (iv. 2). This congruity to nature — the following of nature, and obedience to all her laws — is the key-formula to the doctrines of the Eoman Stoics. 118 ESS A T ON MARCUS A URELl US. “ Everything which is in any way beautiful is beau- ful in itself, and terminates in itself, not having praise as part of itself. Neither worse, then, nor better is a thing made by being praised ... Is such a thing as cm emerald made worse them it was, if it is not praised ? or gold, ivory, purple, a lyre, a little Tcnife, a flower, a shruh r (iv. 20.) “ Everything harmonizes with me which is harmoni- ous to thee, O Universe. Nothing for me is too early nor too late, which is in due time for thee. Every- thing is fruit to me which thy seasons bring, O Nature ! from thee are all things, in thee are all things, to thee all things return. The poet says, Dear city of Cecrops / auid wilt not thou say. Dear city of God T’’ (iv. 23.) “Willingly give thyself up to fate, allowing her to spin thy thread into whatever thing she pleases ” (iv. 34). And here, in a very small matter — getting out of bed in a morning — is one practical application of the formula : “In the morning when thou risest unwillingly, let these thoughts be present, ‘ I am rising to the work of a human being. TUAy, then, am I dissatisfied if I am going to do the things for which I exist, and for which I was brought into the world ? Or have I been made for this, to lie in the bedclothes and keep myself warm V ‘ But this is more pleasant.’ Dost thou exist, then, to take thy pleasure, and not for action or exer- tion f Dost thou not see the little plants, the little birds, the ants, the spiders, the bees, working together to put in order their several parts of the universe? And art thou unwilling to do the work of a human being, and dost thou not make haste to do that which BY CANON FARRAR. 119 is according to thy nature ?” (v. 1.) [“ Go to the ant, thou sluggard ; consider her ways, and be wise !”] The same principle, that Kature has assigned to us our proper place — that a task has been given us to perform, and that our only care should be to perform it aright, for the blessing of the great Whole of which we are but insignificant parts — dominates through the admirable precepts which the Emperor lays down for the regulation of our conduct toward others. Some men, he says, do benefits to others only because they expect a return ; some men even, if they do not demand any return, are not forgetful that they have rendered a benefit ; but others do not even know what they have done, but are like a vine which has produced grapes., and seeks for nothing more after it has pro- duced its proper fruit. So we ought to do good to others as simple and as naturally as a horse runs, or a bee makes honey, or a vine bears grapes, season after season, without thinking of the grapes which it has borne. And in another passage, “What more dost thou want when thou hast done a service to another ? Art thou not content to have done an act conformable to thy nature, and must thou seek to be paid for it, just as if the eye demanded a reward for seeing, or the feet for walking ?” “ Judge every word and deed which is according to nature to be fit for thee, and be not diverted by the blame which follows . . . but if a thing is good to be done or said, do not consider it unworthy of thee ” (v. 3). ^ ^ Sometimes, indeed, Marcus Aurelius wavers. The evils of life overpower him. “ Such as bathing appears to thee,” he says, “ oil, sweat, dirt, filthy water, all 120 ESSAY ON MARCUS A URELIUS. things disgusting — so is every ^art of life and every- thing ” (viii. 24) ; and again : “ Of human life the time is a point, and the substance is in a flux, and the per- ce])tion dull, and the composition of the whole body subject to putrefaction, and the soul a whirl, and fortune hard to divine, and fame a thing devoid of judgment.” But more often he retains his perfect tranquillity, and says, “ Either thou livest here, and hast already accustomed thyself to it, or thou art going away, and this was thine own will ; or thou art dying, and hast discharged thy duty. But besides these things there is nothing. Be of good cheer, then ” (x. 22). “ Take me, and cast me where thou wilt, for then I shall keep my divine part tranquil, that is, content, if it can feel and act conformably to its proper constitu- tion ” (viii. 45). There is something delightful in the fact that even in the Stoic Philosophy there was some comfort to keep men from despair. To a holy and scrupulous conscience like that of Marcus, there would have been an inestimable preciousness in the Christian doctrine of the “ forgiveness of the sins.” Of that divine mercy — of that sin-uncreating power — the ancient world knew nothing ; but in Marcus we find some dim and faint adumbration of the doctrine, expressed in a manner which might at least breathe calm into the spirit of the philosopher, though it could never reach the hearts of the suifering multitude. For “ suppose,” he says, “that thou hast detached thyself from the natural unity — for thou wast made by nature a part, but now hast cut th}-self off — yet here is the beautiful provision that it is in thy power again to unite thyself. God has allowed this to no other part — after it has BY CANON FABBAR. 121 been separated and cut asunder, to come together again. But consider the goodness with which He has privileged man / for He has put it in his power ^ when he has heen separated^ to return and to he reimited, and to resume his place P And elsewhere he says, “ If you cannot maintain a true and magnanimous character, go courageously into some corner where you can main- tain them ; or if even there you fail, depart at once from life, not with passion, but with modest and simple freedom — which will be to have done at least one laudable act.” Sad that even to Marcus Aurelius death should have seemed the only refuge from the despair of ultimal e failure in the struggle to be wise and good ! Marcus valued temperance and self-denial as being the best means of keeping his heart strong and pure ; but we are glad to learn he did not value the rigors of asceticism. Life brought with it enough, and more than enough, of antagonism to brace his nerves; enough, and more than enough, of the rough wind of adversity in his face to make it unnecessary to add more by his own actions. “ It is not fit,” he says, “that I should give myself pain, for I have never intentionally given pain even to another ” (viii. 42). It was a commonplace of ancient philosophy that the life of the wise man should be a contemplation of, and a preparation for, death. It certainly was so with Marcus Aurelius. The thoughts of the nothingness of man, and of that great sea of oblivion Avhich shall hereafter swallow up all that he is and does, are ever present to his mind ; they are thoughts to which he recurs more constantly than any other, and from which he always draws the same moral lesson. 122 ESSA Y ON MARCUS A UBELIU8. “ Since it is possible that thou mayest depart from life this very moment, regulate every act and thought accordingly. . . . Death certainljrj and life, honor and dishonor, pain and pleasure, all these things happen equally to good men and bad, being things whicli make us neither better nor worse. Therefore they are neither good nor evil” (ii. 11). Elsewhere he says that Hippocrates cured diseases and died; and the Chaldseans foretold the future and died ; and Alexander, and Pompey, and Caesar killed thousands, and then died ; and lice destroyed Demo- critus, and other lice killed Socrates ; and Augustus, and his wife, and daughter, and all his descendants, and all his ancestors, are dead ; and Y espasian and all his Court, and all who in his day feasted, and married, and were sick, and chaffered, and fought, and flattered, and plotted, and grumbled, and wished other people to die, and pined to become kings or consuls, are dead ; and all the idle people who are doing the same things now are doomed to die; and all human things are smoke, and nothing at all ; and it is not for us, but for the gods, to settle whether we ]flay the play out, or only a part of it. “ There are many grains of frankin- cense on the same altar ; one falls before, another falls after / but it makes no differenced And the moral of all these thoughts is, “ Death hangs over thee while thou livest; while it is in thy power be good ” (iv. 17). “Thou hast embarked, thou hast made the voyage, thou hast come to shore; get out. If, indeed, to another life there is no want of gods, not even there. But if to a state without sensation, thou wilt cease to be held by jmins and pleasures” (iii. 3). Nor was Marcus at all comforted under present BT CANON FARRAR. 123 annoyances by the thought of posthumous fame. “How ephemeral and worthless human things are,” he says, “and what was yesterday a little mucus, to- morrow will be a mummy or ashes.” “Many who are now praising thee, will very soon blame thee, and neither a posthumous name is of any value, nor repu- tation, nor anything else.” What has become of all great and famous men, and all they desired, and all they loved ? They are “ smoke, and ash, and a tale, or not even a tale.” After all their rages and envy- ings, men are stretched out quiet and dead at last. Soon thou wilt have forgotten all, and soon all wdll have forgotten thee. But here, again, after such thoughts, the same moral is always introduced again : “ Pass then through the little space of time conform- ably to nature, and end the journey in content, jtist as an olive falls of when it is rijye, hlessing nature who ^produced it, and thanking the tree on which it grew.’’’’ “ One thing only troubles me, lest I should do some- thing which the constitution of man does not allow, or in the way which it does not allow, or wdiat it does not allow now.” To quote the thoughts of Marcus Aurelius is to me a fascinating task. But I have already let him speak so largely for himself that by this time the reader will have some conception of his leading motives. It only remains to adduce a few more of the weighty and golden sentences in which he lays down his rule of life. “ To say all in a word, ever^Thing which belongs to the body is a stream, and what belongs to the soul is a dream and vapor; and life is a warfare, and a stranger’s sojourn, and after fame is oblivion. "What, then, is that which is able to enrich a man? One 124 ESSA r ON MARCUS A URELIUS. thing, and only one — philosophy. But this consists in keeping the guardian spirit within a man free from violence and unharmed, superior to pains and pleas- ures, without a purjjose, nor yet falsely, and with h ypocrisy . . . accepting all that happens and all that is allotted . . and finally waiting for death with a cheerful mind'’’’ (ii. 17). “If thou findest in human life anything better than justice, truth, temperance, fortitude, and, in a word, than thine own soul’s satisfaction in the things which ;t enables thee to do according to right reason, and in the condition that is assigned to thee without thy own choice ; if, I say, thou seest anything better than this, turn to it with all thy soul, and enjoy that which thou hast found to be the best. But ... if thou find- est everything else smaller and of less value than this, give place to nothing else. . . . Simply and freely choose the better, and hold to it ” (iii. 6). “ Body, soul, intelligence : to the body belong sensa- tions, to the soul appetites, to the intelligence princi- ples.” To be impressed by the senses is peculiar to animals ; to be pulled by the strings of desire belongs to effeminate men, and to men like Phalaris or Nero; to be guided only by intelligence belongs to atheists and traitors, and “men who do their impure deeds when they have shut the doors. . . . There remains that Avhich is peculiar to the good man, to he fleased and content with what happens, and with the thread which is spun for him ; and not to defile the divinity which is planted in his breast, nor disturb it by a crowd of images ; but to preserve it tranquil, following it obediently as a god, neither saying any- thing contrary to truth, nor doing anything contrary to justice ” (iii. 16). BT CANON FARRAR. 125 “Men seek retreats for themselves, houses in the country, sea-shores, and mountains, and thou too art wont to desire such things very much. But this is altogether a mark of the commonest sort of men, for it is in thy power whenever thou shalt chose to retire into thyself. For nowhere either tcith more quiet or with more freedom does a man retire than into his own soul, particularly when he has within him such thoughts that by looking into them he is immediately in perfect tranquillity, which is nothing else than the good ordering of the mind ” (iv. 3). “Unhappy am I, because this has happened to me? Uot so, but happ3^ am I though this has happened to me, because I continue free from pain ; neither crushed by the present, nor fearing the future” (iv. 19). It is just possible that in some of these passages some readers may detect a trace of painful self-con- sciousness, and imagine that they detect a little grain of self-complacence. Something of self consciousness is perhaps inevitable in the diary and examination of his own conscience by one who sat on such a lonely height ; but self-complacency there is none. Uay, there is sometimes even a cruel sternness in the Avay in which the Emperor speaks of his own self. He certainly dealt not with himself in the manner of a dissembler with God. “ When,” he says (x. 8), “ thou hast assumed the names of a man who is good, modest, rational, magnanimous, cling to those names ; and if thou shouldst lose them, quickly return to them. . • . For to continue to he such as thou hast hitherto been, and to be torn in pieces, and defiled in such a life, is the character of a very stupid man, and one over-fond of 126 BSSA T OJSr MARCUS A URELIUS. his life, and like those half-devoured fighters with vnld Jjeasts, who, though covered with wounds and gore, still entreat to he hejyt till the following day, though they loill he exposed in the same state to the same claws and hites. Therefore fix thyself in the possession of these fe\v names: and if thou art able to abide in them, abide as if thou were removed to the Islands of the Blest.” Alas! to Aurelius, in this life, the Islands of the Blest were very far away. Heathen philosophy Avas exalted and eloquent, but all its votaries Avere sad ; to “the peace of God, Avhich passeth all understaird- ins:,” it Avas not given them to attain. We see Marcus “ Avise, self -governed, tender, thankful, blameless,” says Mr. Arnold, “ yet with all this agitated, stretching out his arms for something beyond — tendentemgue manue riyxe ulterioris amore.’’'’ I will quote, in conclusion, but three short precepts : “ Be cheerful, and seek not external help, nor the tranquillity Avhich others giAm. A man must stand erect, not he kept erect hy others’’’’ (iv. 5). “ Be like the promontory aga ’inst which the waves con- tinued, ly break, hut it stands firm and tames the fury of the water around it ” (iv. 49). This comparison has been used many a time since the days of Marcus Aurelius. The reader will at once recall Goldsmith’s famous lines : “ As some tall cliff that rears its awful form, Swells from the vale, and midway leaves the storm. Though round its breast the rolling clouds are spread. Eternal sunshine settles on its head.” “ Short is the little that remains to thee of life. Live as on a mountain. For it makes no difference Avhetlier a man lives there or here, if he lives every- BT CANON FARRAR. m where in the Avorld as in a civil community. Let men see, let them know a real man who lives as he was meant to live. If they cannot endure him, let them kiU him. For that is better than to live as men do ” (x. 15). Such were some of the thoughts which Marcus Aurelius wrote in his diary after days of battle with the Quadi, and the Marcomanni, and the Sarmatge. Isolated from others no less by moral grandeur than by the supremacy of his sovereign rank, he sought the society of his own noble soul. I sometimes imagine that I see him seated on the borders of some gloomy Pannonian forest or Hungarian marsh ; through the darkness the watch-fires of the enemy gleam in the dis- tance; but both among them, and in the camp around him, every sound is hushed, except the tread of the sentinel outside the imperial tent ; and in that tent long after midnight sits the patient Emperor by the light of his solitary lamp, and ever and anon, amid his lonely musings, he pauses to Avrite doAAm the pure and holy thoughts Avhich shall better enable him, even in a Roman palace, even on barbarian battle-fields, daily to tolerate the meanness and the malignity of the men around him ; daily to amend his own shortcomings, and, as the sun of earthly life begins to set, daily to draAv nearer and nearer to the Eternal Light. And Avhen I thus think of him, I knoAV not Avhether the Avhole of heathen antiquity, out of its gallery of stately and royal figures, can furnish a nobler, or purer, or more loA’^able picture than that of this croAvned philosopher and laurelled hero, Avho Avas yet one of the humblest and one of the most enlightened of all ancient “ Seekers after God.” the meditations OF Marcus Aurelius Antoninus. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, I. From my grandfather Yerus* * * § [I learned] good morals and the goverment of my temper. 2. From the reputation and remembrance of my father,]; modesty and a manly character. 3. From my mother, § piety and beneficence, and abstinence, not only from evil deeds, but even from evil thoughts; and further simplicity in iny way of living, far removed from the habits of the rich. 4. From my great-grandfather,! not to have fre- quented public schools, and to have had good teachers at home, and to know that on such things a man should spend liberally. * Annius Verus was liis grandfather’s name. There is no verb in this section connected with the word “from,” nor in the following sections of this book; and it is not quite certain what verb should he supplied. What I have added may express the meaning here, though there are sections which it will not fit. If he does not mean to say that he learned of these good things from the several persons whom he mentions, he means that he observed certain good qualities in them, or received certain benefits from them, and it is implied that he was the better for it, or at least might have been; for it would be a mistake to understand Marcus as saying that he possessed all the virtues which he observed in his kinsmen and teachers. :j:His father’s name was Annius Verus. § His mother was Domitia Calvilla, named also Lucilla. I Perhaps his mother’s grandfather, Catilius Severus. 133 THE MEDITATIONS OF 5. From my goveimor, to be neither of the green nor of the blue party at the games in the Circus, nor a partizan either of the Parmularius or the Scutarius at the gladiators’ fights ; from him too I learned endurance of labor, and to want little, and to work with my own hands, and not to meddle with other people’s affairs, and not to be ready to listen to slander. 6. From Diognetus,* not to busy myself about trifling things, and not to give credit to what was said by miracle- workers and jugglers about incantations and the driving away of demons and such things ; and not to breed quails [for fighting], nor to give myself up passionately to such things ; and to endure freedom of speech ; and to have become intimate with philosophy ; and to have been a hearer, first of Bacchius, then of Tandasis and Marcianus ; and to have written dialogues in my youth ; and to have desired a plank bed and skin, and whatever else of the kind belongs to the Grecian discipline. 7. From Rusticusj; I received the impression that my character required improvement and discipline ; and from him I learned not to be led astray to sophistic emulation, nor to writing on speculative matters, nor * In the works of J ustinus there is printed a letter to one Diognetus, whom the writer names “most excellent.” He was a Gentile, but he wished very much to know what the religion of the Christians was, what God they worshipped, and how this worship made them despise the world and death, and neither believe in the gods of the Greeks nor observe the superstition of the Jews ; and what was this love to one another which they had, and why this new kind of religion was introduced now and not before. My friend, Mr. Jenkins, rector of Lyminge in Kent, has suggested to me that this Diognetus may have been the tutor of M. Antoninus. Q. Junius Rusticus was a Stoic philosopher, whom Antoninus valued highly, and often took his advice. (Capitol. M. Antonin, iii.) MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 133 to delivering little hortatory orations, nor to showing myself off as a man who practices much disciphne, or does benevolent acts in order to make a display ; and to abstain from rhetoric, and poetry, and fine writing ; and not to walk about in the house in my outdoor dress, nor to do other things of the kind ; and to write my letters with simphcity, like the letter which Eusticus wrote from Sinuessa to my mother ; and with respect to those who have offended me by words, or done me wrong, to be easily disposed to be pacified and reconciled, as soon as they have shown a readiness to be reconciled ; and to read carefully, and not to be satisfied with a superficial understanding of a book ; nor hastily to give my assent to those who talk over- much ; and I am indebted to him for being acquainted with the discourses of Epictetus, which he communi- cated to me out of his own collection. 8. From Apollonius* I learned freedom of will and undeviating steadiness of purpose; and to look to nothing else, not even for a moment, except to reason ; and to be always the same, in sharp pains, on the occasion of the loss of a child, and in long illness ; and to see clearly in a living example that the same man can be both most resolute and yielding, and not peevish in giving his instruction ; and to have had before my eyes a man who clearly considered his experience and his skill in expounding philosophical principles as the smallest of his merits ; and from him I learned how to receive from friends Avhat are esteemed favors, without being either hmnbled by them or letting them pass unnoticed. * Apollonius of CAalcis came to Rome in the time of Pius to be Marcus’ preceptor. He was a rigid Stoic. 134 THE MEDITATIONS OE 9. From Sextus,* * * § a benevolent disposition, and the example of a family governed in a fatherly manner, and the idea of living conformably to nature ; and gravity without affectation, and to look carefully after the interests of friends, and to tolerate ignorant per- sons, and those who form opinions without considera- tion : he had the power of readily accommodating himself to all, so that intercourse with him was more agreeable than any flattery ; and at the same time he was most highly venerated by those who associated with him : and he had the faculty both of discovering and ordering, in an intelligent and methodical way, the principles necessary for life ; and he never showed anger or any other passion, but was entirely free from passion, and also most affectionate; and he could ex- press approbation without noisy display, and he pos- sessed much knowledge without ostentation. 10. From Alexander the grammarian, to refrain from fault-flnding, and not in a reproachful way to chide those who uttered any barbarous or solecistic or sti’ange-sounding expression ; but dexterously to introduce the very expression which ought to have been used, and in the way of answer or giving con- firmation, or joining in an inquiry about the thing itself, not about the word, or by some other fit sug- gestion. 11. From Fronto§ I learned to observe what envy * Sextus of Cliteronea, a grandson of Plutarch, or nephew, as some say ; hut more probably a grandson. Alexander was a Grammaticus, a native of Phrygia. He wrote a commentary on Homer; and the rhetorician Aristides wrote a pane- gyric on Alexander in a funeral oration. § M. Cornelius Pronto was a rhetorician, and in great favor with Marcus. There are extant various letters between Marcus and Pronto. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINCS. 135 and duplicity and hypocrisy are in a tyrant, and that generally those among us who are called Patricians are rather deficient in paternal affection. 12. Fi’om Alexander the Platonic, not frequently nor without necessity to say to any one, or to write in a letter, that I have no leisure ; nor continually to excuse the neglect of duties required by our relation to those with whom we live, by alleging urgent occu- pations. 13. From Catulus,'^ not to be indifferent when a friend finds fault, even if he should find fault without reason, but to tiy to restore him to his usual disposi- tion ; and to be ready to speak well of teachers, as it is reported of Domitius and Athenodotus ; and to love my children truly. 14. From my brother;}; Severus, to love my kin, and to love truth, and to love justice; and through him I learned to know Thrasea, Helvidius, Cato, Dion, Brutus ;§ and from him I received the idea of a polity in which there is the same law for all, a polity admin- istered with regard to equal rights and equal freedom of speech, and the idea of a kingl}'^ government which respects most of all the freedom of the governed ; I learned from him alsof consistency and undeviating steadiness in my regard for philosophy, and a disposi- * Cinna Catulus, a Stoic philosopher. t The word brother may not he genuine. Antoninus had no brother. It has been supposed that he may mean some cousin. Schultz in his translation omits “brother,” and says that this Severus is probably Claudius Severus, a peripatetic. § We know, from Tacitus xiii., xvi. 21, and other passages), who Thrasea and Helvidius were. Plutarch has written the lives of the two Catos, and of Dion and Brutus, Antoninus probably alludes to (["ato of Utica, who was a Stoic, 13G THE MEDITATIONS OF to do good, and to give to others readily, and to cherish good hopes, and to believe that I am loved by my friends ; and in him I observed no concealment of his opinions with respect to those whom he con- demned, and that his friends had no need to con- jecture what he wished or did not wish, but it was quite plain. 15. From Maximus* I learned self-government, and not to be led aside by anything ; and cheerfulness in all circumstances, as well as in illness; and a just admixture in the moral character of sweetness and dignity, and to do what was set before me without complaining. I observed that everybody believed that he thought as he spoke, and that in all that he did he never had any bad intention; and he never showed amazement and surprise, and was never in a hurry, and never put off doing a thing, nor was perplexed nor dejected, nor did he ever laugh to disguise his vexa- tion, nor, on the other hand, was he ever passionate or suspicious. He was accustomed to do acts of be- neficence, and was ready to forgive, and was free from all falsehood; and he presented the appearance of a man who could not be diverted from right rather than of a man who had been improved. I observed, too, that no man could ever think that he was despised by Maximus, or ever venture to think himself a better man. He had also the art of being humorous in an agreeable way. 16. In ray fatherj; I observed mildness of temper, * Claudius Maximus was a Stoic philosopher, who was highly esteemed also by Antoninus Pius, Marcus’ predecessor. The character of Maximus is that of a perfect man. (See viii. 25.) t He means his adoptive father, his predecessor, the Emperor Antoninus Pius. Compare vi. 30. MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 137 and unchangeable resolution in the things which he had determined after due deliberation; and no vain- glory in those things which men call honors ; and a love of labor and perseverance; and a readiness to listen to those who had anything to propose for the common weal ; and undeviating firmness in giving to every man according to his deserts ; and a knowledge derived from experience of the occasions for vigorous action and for remission. And I observed that he had overcome all passion for joys ; and he considered him- self no more than any other citizen, and he released his friends from all obligation to sup with him or to attend him of necessity when he went abroad, and those who had failed to accompany him, by reason of any urgent circumstances, always found him the same. I observed, too, his habit of careful inquiry in all mat- ters of deliberation, and his persistency, and that he never stopped his investigation through being satis- fied with appearances which first present themselves ; and that his disposition was to keep his friends, and not to be soon tired of them, nor yet to be extravagant in his affection ; and to be satisfied on all occasions, and cheerful ; and to foresee things a long way off, and to provide for the smallest without display ; and to check immediately popular applause and flattery ; and to be ever watchful over the things that were neces- sary for the administration of the empire, and to be a good manager of the expenditure, and patiently to endure the blame which he got for such conduct ; and he was neither superstitious with respect to the gods, nor did he court men by gifts or by trying to please them, or by flattering the populace ; but he showed sobriety in all things and firmness, and never any 138 THE MEDITATIONS OF mean thoughts or action, nor love of novelty. And the things which conduce in any way to the commod- ity of life, and of which fortune gives an abundant supply, he used without arrogance and without excus- ing himself ; so that when he had them, he enjoyed them without affectation, and when he had them not he did not want tliem. No one could ever say of him that he was either a sophist or a [home-bred] flippant slave or a pedant; but every one acknowledged him to be a man ripe, perfect, above flattery, able to manage his own and other men’s affairs. Besides this, he hon- ored those who were ti-ue philosophers, and he did not reproach those who pretended to be philosophers, nor yet was he easily led b^^ them. He was also easy m conversation, and he made himself agreeable without any offensive affectation. lie took a reasonable care of his body’s health, not as one who was greatly attached to life, nor out of regard to personal appear- ance, nor yet in a careless way, but so that, through his own attention, he very seldom stood in need of the ]:>hy- sician’s art or of medicine or external ap])lications. He was most ready to give way without envy to those who possessed any particular faculty, such as that of elo- quence or knowledge of the law or of morals, or of any- thing else ; and he gave them his help, that each might enjoy reputation according to his deserts ; and he always acted conformably to the institutions of his country, without showing any affectation of doing so. Further, he was not fond of change, nor unsteady, but he loved to stay in the same places, and to employ himself about the same things ; and after his paroxysms of headache he came immediately fresh and vigorous to his usual occupations. His secrets were not many, but very MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONIMUS. 139 few and very rare, and these only about public mat- ters; and he showed prudence and economy in the exhibition of the public spectacles and the construction of public buildings, his donations to the people, and in such things, for he was a man who looked to what ought to be done, not to the reputation w^hich is got by a man’s acts. He did not take the bath at unsea- sonable hours ; he was not fond of building houses, nor curious about what he eat, nor about the texture and color of his clothes, nor about the beauty of his slaves.* * * § His dress came from Lorium, his villa on the coast, and from Lanuvium generally.:}; W e know how he behaved to the toll-collector at Tusculum who asked his par- don ; and such was all his behavior. There was in him nothing harsh, nor implacable, nor violent, nor, as one may say, anjdhing carried to the sweating point : but he examined all things severally, as if he had abun- dance of time, and without confusion, in an orderly way, vigorously and consistently. And that might be applied to him which is recorded of Socrates,§ that he was able both to abstain from, and to enjoy, those things which many are too weak to abstain from, and cannot enjoy without excess. But to be strong enough both to bear the one and to be sober in the other is the mark of a man who has a perfect and invincible soul, such as he showed in the illness of Maximus. 17 . To the gods I am indebted for having good grandfathers, good parents, a good sister, good teach- ers, good associates, good kinsmen and friends, nearly * This passage is corrupt and the exact meaning is uncertain. t Lorium was a villa on the coast north of Rome, and there Antoninus was brought up, and he died there. This also is corrupt. § Xenophon, Memorab. i. 3. 15. 140 THE MEDITATIONS OF everything good. Further, I oAve it to the gods that I Avas not hurried into any offense against any of them, though I had a disposition AA^hioh, if opportunity had offered, might have led me to do something of this kind ; but, through their favor, there never was such a concurrence of circumstances as put me to the trial. Further, I am thankful to the gods that I Avas not longer brought up with my grandfather’s concubine, and that I preserved the flower of my youth, and that I did not make proof of my virility before the proper season, but even deferred the time ; that I AA^as subjected to a ruler and a father who Avas able to take aAvay all pride from me, and to bring me to the knoAvledge that it is possible for a man to live in a palace Avithout Avant- ing either guards or embroidered dresses, or torches and statues, and such-like show ; but it is in such a man’s power to bring himself very near to the fashion of a private person, Avithout being for this reason either meaner in thought, or more remiss in action, Avith respect to the things Avhich must be done for the public interest in a manner that befits a ruler. I thank the gods for giving me such a brother,* Avho Avas able by his moral character to rouse me to vigilance over my- self, and Avho, at the same time, pleased me by his respect and affection ; that my children have not been stupid nor deformed in body ; that I did not make more proficiency in rhetoric, poetry, and the other studies, in Avhich I should perhaps have been completely en- gaged, if I had seen that I Avas making progress in them ; that I made haste to place those Avho brought me up in the station of honor, Avhich they seemed to * The emperor had no brother, except L. Verus, his brother by adoption. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 141 desire, without putting them off with hope of my doing it some time after, because they were then still young; that I knew Apollonius, Eusticus, IVIaximus; that I received clear and frequent impressions about living ac- cording to nature, and what kind of a life that is, so that, so far as depended on the gods, and their gifts and help, and inspirations, nothing hindered me from forthwith living according to nature, though I still fall short of it through my own fault, and though not observing the admonitions of the gods, and, I may ahnoct say, their direct instructions ; that my body has held out so long in such a kind of life ; that I never touched either Benedicta or Theodotus, and that, after having fallen into ama- tory passions, I was cured ; and, thougli I was often out of humor Avith Rusticus, I never did anything of which I had occasion to repent ; that, though it Avas my mother’s fate to die young, she spent the last years of her life with me; that Avhenever I wished to help any man in his need, or on any other occasion, I Avas neAmr told that I had not the means of doing it ; and that to my- self the same necessity ncA^er happened, to receive any thing from another; that I have such a Avife,* so obedient, and so affectionate, and so simple; that I had abundance of good masters for my children; and that remedies have been shown to me by dreams, both others, and against blood-spitting and giddiness;:}; . . , and that, Avhen I had an inclination to philos- ophy I did not fall into the hands of any sophist, and that I did not Avaste my time on writers [of histories], or in the resolution of syllogisms, or occupy myself about the investigation of appearances in the heavens ; *See tlie Life of Antoninus, i This is corrupt 143 THE MEDITATIONS OF for all these things require the help of the gods and fortune. Among the Quadi at the Granua.* * The Quadi lived in the southern part of Bohemia and Moravia; and Antoninus made a campaign against them. (See the Life.) Granua is prohahly the river Graan, which flows into the-Danube. If these words are genuine, Antoninus may have written this first book during the war with the Quadi. In the first edition of Anto- ninus, and in the older editions, the first three sections of the second book make the conclusion of the first book. Gataker placed them at the beginning of the second book. MARCU8 A URELIU8 ANT0NINU8. 143 II. Begin the morning by saying to thyself, I shall meet with the busybody, the ungrateful, arrogant, deceitful, envious, unsocial. All these things happen to them by reason of their ignorance of what is good and evil. But I who have seen the nature of the good that it is beautiful, and of the bad that it is ugly, and the nature of him who does wrong, that it is akin to me, not [only] of the same blood or seed, but that it participates in [the same] intelligence and [the same] portion of the divinity, I can neither be injured by any of them, for no one can fix on me what is ugly, nor can I be angry with my kinsman, nor hate him. For we are made for co-operation, like feet, like hands, like eyelids, like the rows of the upper and lower teeth.* To act against one another then is contrary to nature ; and it is acting against one another to be vexed and to turn away. 2. Whatever this is that I am, it is a little flesh and breath, and the ruling part. Throw away thy books ; no longer distract thyself : it is not allowed ; but as if thou wast now dying, despise the flesh ; it is blood and bones and a network, a contexture of nerves, veins and arteries. See the breath also, what kind of a thing it is ; air, and not always the same, but every moment sent out and again sucked in. The third then is the * Xenophon, Mem. ii. 3. 18. 144 THE MEDITATION'S OF ruling part : consider thus : Thou art an old man ; no longer let this be a slave, no longer be pulled by the strings like a puppet to unsocial movements, no longer be either dissatisfied with thy present lot, or shrink from the future. 3. All that is from the gods is full of providence. That which is from fortune is not separated from nature or without an interweaving and involution with the things which are ordered by Providence. From thence all things flow ; and there is besides necessity, and that which is for the advantage of the whole uni- verse, of which thou art a part. But that is good for every part of nature which the nature of the whole brings, and what serves to maintain this nature, hfow the universe is preserved, as by the changes of the elements so by the changes of things compounded of the elements. Let these principles be enough for thee ; let them always be fixed opinions. But cast away the thirst after books, that thou mayest not die murmur- ing, but cheerfully, truly, and from thy heart thankful to the gods. 4. Remember how long thou hast been putting off these things, and how often thou hast received an opportunity from the gods, and yet dost not use it. Thou must now at last perceive of what universe thou art a part, and of what administrator of the universe thy existence is an efflux, and that a limit of time is fixed for thee, which if thou dost not use for clearing away the clouds from thy mind, it will go and thou wilt go, and it will never return. 5. Every moment think steadily as a Roman and a man to do what thou hast in hand with perfect and simple dignity, and feeling of affection, and freedom. MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 143 and justice ; and to give thyself relief from all other thoughts. And thou wilt give thyself relief, if thou doest every act of thy life as if it were the last, laying aside all carelessness and passionate aversion from the commands of reason, and all hypocrisy, and self-love, and discontent with the portion which has been given to thee. Thou seest how few the things are, the which if a man lays hold of, he is able to live a life which flows in quiet, and is like the existence of the gods ; for the gods on their part will require nothing more from him who observes these things. 6. Do wrong* to thyself, do wrong to thyself, my soul ; but thou wilt no longer have the opportunity of honoring thyself. Every man’s life is sufRcient.f But thine is nearly finished, though thy soul reverences not itself, but places thy felicity in the souls of others. 7. Do the things external which fall upon thee dis- tract thee? Give thyself time to learn something new and good, and cease to be whirled around. But then thou must also avoid being carried about the other way. For those too are triflers who have wearied themselves in life by their activity, and yet have no object to which to direct every movement, and, in a word, all their thoughts. 8. Through not observing what is in the mind of another a man has seldom been seen to be unhappy ; but those who do not observe the movements of their own minds must of necessity be unhappy. 9. This thou must always bear in mind, what is the nature of the whole, and what is my nature, and how this is related to that, and what kind of a part it is of what kind of a whole ; and that there is no one who * Perhaps it should be “ thou art doing violence to thyself.” 14(5 THE MEHITATIONS OF hinders thee from always doing and saying the things which are according to the nature of which thou art a part. 10. Theophrastus, in his comparison of bad acts — such a comparison as one would make in accordance with the common notions of mankind — says, like a true ])hilosopher, that the offenses which are committed through desire are more blameable than those which are committed through anger For he who is excited by anger seems to turn away from reason with a certain pain and unconscious contraction ; but he who offends through desire, being overpowered by pleasure, seems to be in a manner more intemperate and more womanish in his offenses. Rightly then, and in a way wortliy of philosophy, he said that the offense Avhich is committed with pleasure is more blameable than that which is committed with pain ; and on the Avhole the one is more like a person who has been first wronged and tlirough pain is compelled to be angry ; but the other is moved by his own impulse to do wrong, being carried toward doing something by desire. 11. Since it is possible* that thou mayest depart from life this very moment, regulate every act and thought accordingly.;}; Rut to go aAvay from among men, if there are gods, is not a thing to be afraid of, for the gods will not iiwolve thee in evil ; but if indeed they do not exist, or if they have no concern about human affairs, what is it to me to live in a universe devoid of gods or devoid of providence? But in truth they do exist, and they do care for human things, and they have * Or it may mean “since it is in tliy power to depart which gives a meaning somewhat diiferent. I See Cicero, Tuscul. i. 49. MARCnS A tlRELIirS ANTONINUS. 147 put all the means in man’s power to enable him not to fall into real evils. And as to the rest, if there was anything evil, they would have provided for this also, that it should be altogether in a man’s power not to fall into it. Now, that which does not make a man worse, how can it make a man’s life worse? But neither through ignorance, nor having the knowledge, but not the power to guard against or correct these things, is it possible that the nature of the universe has overlooked them ; nor is it possible that it has made so great a mistake, either through want of power or wursuit, I cannot imagine. B-ut on the contrary'- it is a man’s duty to comfort himself, and to w'ait for the natural dissolution and not to be vexed at the delay, but to rest in these principles only : the one, that nothing will happen to me which is not conformable to the nature of the universe ; and the other, that it is in my power never to act contrary to my god and demon : for there is no man who will compel me to this. 11. About what am I now employing my own soul? On every occasion I must ask myself this question, and inquire, what have I now in this part of me which they call the ruling principle ? and whose soul have I now ? that of a child, or of a young man, or of a feeble woman, or of a tyrant, or of a domestic animal, or of a wild beast ? 12. What kind of things those are which appear good to the many, we may learn even from this. For if any man should conceive certain things as being really good, such as prudence, temperance, justice, fortitude, he would not after having first conceived these endure to listen to anythingf which should not be in harmony with what is really good.f But if a man has first conceived as good the things which appear to the many to be good, he will listen and readily receive as very applicable that which was said by the comic writer. fThus even the many perceive the differencef For were it not so, this saying would not offend and would not be rejected [in the first MARCUS A URELIUS AMTOMINUS. 1?3 case], while we receive it when it is said of wealth, and of the means which further luxury and fame, as said fitly and wittily. Go on then and ask if we should value and think those things to be good, to which after their first conception in the mind the words of the comic writer might be aptly applied — that he who has them, through pure abundance has not a place to ease himself in. 13. I am composed of the formal and the material ; and neither of them will perish into non-existence, as neither of them came into existence out of non- existence. Every part of me then will be reduced by change into some part of the universe, and that again will change into another part of the universe, and so on forever. And by consequence of such a change I too exist, and those who begot me, and so on forever in the other direction. For nothing hinders us from saying so, even if the universe is administered according to definite periods [of revolution]. Id. Reason and the reasoning art [philosophy] are powers which are sufficient for themselves and for their own works. They move then from a first prin- ciple which is their own, and they make their way to the end which is proposed to them; and this is the reason why such acts are named Catorthoseis or right acts, which word signifies that they proceed by the right road. 15. Rone of these things ought to be called a man’s, which do not belong to a man, as man. They are not required of a man, nor does man’s nature promise them, nor are they the means of man’s nature attain- ing its end. Reither then does the end of man lie in these things, nor yet that which aids to the accom- 184 THE MEDITATIONS OF plisbraent of this end, and that which aids toward this end is that which is good. Besides, if any of these things did belong to man, it would not be right for a man to despise them and to set himself against them; nor would a man be worthy of praise who showed that he did not want these things, nor would he who stinted himself in any of them be good, if indeed these things were good. But now the more of these things a man deprives himself of, or of other things like them, or even when he is deprived of any of them, the more patiently he endures the loss, just in the same degree he is a better man. 16. Such as are thy habitual thoughts, such also will be the character of thy mind ; for the soul is dyed by the thoughts. Dye it then with a continuous series of such thoughts as these : for instance, that where a man can live, there he can also live well. But he must live in a palace — well then, he can also live well in a palace. And again, consider that for whatever pur- pose each thing has been constituted, for this it has been constituted, and toward this it is carried; and its end is in that toward which it is canned ; and where the end is, there also is the advantage and the good of each thing. H”ow the good for the reasonable animal is society ; for that we are made for society has been shown above.* Is it not plain that the inferior exist for the sake of the superior? but the things which have life are superior to those which have not life, and of those which have life the superior are those which have reason. 17. To seek what is impossible is madness : and it is *Comp. ii. 1. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 185 impossible that the bad should not do something of this kind. 18. Nothing happens to* any man which he is not formed by nature to bear. The same things happen to another, and either because he does not see that the}'' have happened or because he would show a great spirit he is firm and remains unharmed. It is a shame then that ignorance and conceit should be stronger than wisdom. 19. Things themselves touch not the soul, not in the least degree ; nor have they admission to the soul, nor can they turn or move the soul : but the soul turns and moves itself alone, and whatever judgments it may think proper to make, such it makes for itself the things which present themselves to it. 20. In one respect man is the nearest thing to me, so far as I must do good to men and endure them. But so far as some men make themselves obstacles to my proper acts, man becomes to me one of the things which are indifferent, no less than the sun or wind or a wild beast. Now it is true that these may impede my. action, but they are no impediments to my affects and disposition, which have the power of acting con- ditionally and changing : for the mind converts and changes every hindrance to its activity into an aid ; and so that which is a hindrance is made a furtherance to an act ; and that which is an obstacle on the road helps us on this road.* 21. Reverence that which is best in the universe; and this is that which makes use of all things and directs all things. And in like manner also reverence that which is best in thyself; and this is of the same kind as that. For in thyself also, that which makes 186 TEE MEDITATIONS OF use of everything else, is this, and thy life is directed by this. 22. That which does no harm to the State, does no harm to the citizen. In the case of every appearance of harm apply this rule : if the State is not harmed by this, neither am I harmed. But if the State is harmed, thou must not be angr}'- with him who does harm to the State. Show him where his error is. 23. Often think of the rapidity with which things pass by and disappear, both the things which are and the things which are produced. For substance is like a river in a continual flow, and the activities of things are in constant change, and the causes work in infinite varieties ; and there is hardly anything which stands still. And consider this which is near to thee, this boundless abyss of the past and of the future in which all things disappear. How then is he not a fool who is puffed up Avith such things or plagued about them and makes himself miserable ? for they vex him only for a time, and a short time. 2i. Think of the universal substance, of which thou hast a very small portion ; and of universal time, of Avhich a short and indivisible interval has been assigned to thee ; and of that which is fixed by destiny, and how small a part of it thou art. 25. Does another do me Avrong ? Let him look to it. He has his OAvn disposition, his own activity. I noAv have Avhat the universal nature wills me to have; and I do what my nature now Avills me to do. 26. Let the part of thy soul which leads and governs be undisturbed by the movements in the flesh, Avhether of pleasure or of pain ; and let it not unite Avith them, but let it circumscribe itself and limit those affects to MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. ' 187 their parts. But when these affects rise up to the mind by virtue of that other sympathy that naturally exists in a body which is all one, then thou must not strive to resist the sensation, for it is natural; but let not the ruling part of itself add to the sensation the opinion that it is either good or bad. 27. Live with the gods. And he does live with the gods who constantly shows to them that his own soul is satisfied with that which is assigned to him, and that it does all that the demon wishes, which Zeus hath given to every man for his guardian and guide, a portion of himself. And this is eveiy man’s under- standing and reason. 28. Art thou angry with him whose arm-pits stink ? Art thou angry Avith him Avhose mouth smells foul ? What good will this anger do thee ? He has such a mouth, he has such arm-pits : it is necessary that such an emanation must come from such things — but the man has reason, it Avill be said, and he is able, if he takes pains, to discover Avherein he offends — I wish thee well of thy discovery. Well, then, and thou hast reason : by thy rational faculty stir up his rational faculty ; show him his error, admonish him. For if he listens, thou Avilt cure him, and there is no need of anger, [f Neither tragic actor nor whore. f]* 29. As thou intendest to live when thou art e;one out, . . . so it is in thy poAver to live here. But if men do not permit thee, then get away out of life, yet so as if thou Avert suffering no harm. The house is smoky, and I quit it. Why dost thou think that this *This is imperfect or corrupt, or both. I have translated it literally and left it imperfect. t Epictetus, i. 25, 18. 188 THE MEDITATIONS OF is any trouble ? But so long as nothing of the kind drives me out, I remain, am free, and no man shall hinder me from doing what I choose ; and I choose to do what is according to the nature of the rational and social animal. 30. The intelligence of the universe is social. Accordingly it has made the inferior things for the sake of the superior, and it has fitted the superior to one another. Thou seest how it has subordinated, co-ordi- nated and assigned to everything its proper portion, and has brought together into concord with one another the things which are the best. 31. How hast thou behaved hitherto to the gods, thy parents, brethren, children, teachers, to those who looked after thy infancy, to thy friends, kinsfolk, to thy slaves? Consider if thou hast hitherto behaved to all in such a way that this may be said of thee : Never lias wronged a man in deed or word. And call to recollection both how many things thou hast passed through, and how many things thou hast been able to endure : and that the history of thy life is now complete, and thy service is ended : and how many beautiful things thou hast seen : and how many pleasures and pains thou hast despised ; and how many things called honorable thou hast spurned ; and to how many ill - minded folks thou hast shown a kind disposition. 32. Why do unskilled and ignorant souls disturb him who has skill and knowledge? What soul then has skill and knowledge? That which knows begin- ning and end, and knows the reason which pervades MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 189 all substance and through all time by fixed periods [revolutions] administers the universe. 33. Soon, very soon, thou wilt be ashes, or a skeleton, and either a name or not even a name ; but name is sound and echo. And the things which are much valued in life are empty and rotten and trilling, and [like] little dogs biting one another, and little children quarrelling, laughing, and then straightway weeping. But fidelity and modesty and justice and truth are fied Up to Olympus from the wide-spread earth. Hesiod, Works, etc., v. 197. What then is there which still detains thee here? If the objects of sense are easily changed and never stand still, and the organs of perception are dull and easily receive false impressions; and the poor soul itself is an exhalation from blood. But to have good repute amid such a world as this is an empt}^ thing. Why then dost thou not wait in tranquillity for thy end, whether it is extinction or removal to another state? And until that time comes, what is sufficient ? Why, what else than to venerate the gods and bless them, and to do good to men, and to practice tolerance and self-restraint ; * but as to everything which is beyond the limits of the poor flesh and breath, to remember that this is neither thine nor in thy power. 34. Thou canst pass thy life in an equable flow of happiness, if thou canst go by the right way, and think and act in the right w^ay. These two things are com- *This is the Stoic precept dvexov ua'l ditixov. The first part teaches us to be content with men and things as they are. The second part teaches us the virtue of self-restraint, or the government pf our passions. 190 THE MEDITATIONS OF mon both to the soul of God and to the soul of man, and to the soul of every rational being, not to be hindered by another ; and to hold good to consist in the disposition to justice and the practice of it, and in this to let thy desire find its termination. 35. If this is neither my own badness, nor an effect of my own badness, and the common weal is not injured, why am I troubled about it? and what is the harm to the common weal ? 36. Do not be carried along inconsiderately by the a])pearance of things, but give help [to all] according to thy ability and tlieir fitness ; and if they should have sustained loss in matters which are indifferent, do not imagine this to be a damage. For it is a bad habit. But as the old man, when he went away, asked back his foster-child’s top, remembering that it was a top, so do thou in this case also. When thou art calling out on the Eostra, hast thou forgotten, man, what these things are ? Yes ; but they are objects of great concern to these people — wilt thou too then be made a fool for these things ? I was once a fortunate man, but I lost it, I know not how. But fortunate means that a man has assigned to himself a good fortune ; and a good fortune is good disposition of the sold, good emotions, good actions.* * This section is unintelligible. Many of the words may be corrupt, and the general purport of the section cannot be discovered. Perhaps several things have been improperly joined in one section. I have translated it nearly literally. Different translators give the section a different turn, and the critics have tried to mend what they cannot understand. MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 191 YI. The substance of the universe is obedient and com- pliant ; and the reason which governs it has in itself no cause for doing evil, for it has no malice, nor does it do evil to anything, nor is anything harmed by it. But all things are made and perfected according to this reason. 2. Let it make no difference to thee whether thou art cold or warm, if thou art doing thy duty ; and whether thou art drowsy or satisfied with sleep ; and whether ill-spoken of or praised ; and whether dying or doing something else. For it is one of the acts of life, this act by which we die ; it is sufficient then in this act also to do well what we have in hand (vi. 22, 28). 3. Look within. Let neither the peculiar quality of anything nor its value escape thee. 4. All existing things soon change, and they will either be reduced to vapor, if indeed all substance is one, or they will be dispersed. 5. The reason which governs knows what its own disposition is, and Avhat it does, and on what material it Avorks. 6. The best way of avenging thyself is not to become like [the wrong doer]. 7. Take pleasure in one thing and rest in it, in 192 THE MEDITATIONS OF passing from one social act to another social act, think- ing of God. 8. The ruling principle is that which rouses and turns itself, and while it makes itself such as it is and such as it wills to he, it also makes everything which happens appear to itself to be such as it wills. 9. In conformity to the nature of the universe every single thing is accomplished, for certainly it is not in conformit}'^ to any other nature that each thing is accomplished, either a nature which externally com- prehends this, or a nature which is comprehended within this nature, or a nature external and inde- pendent of this (xi. 1, vi. 40, viii. 50). 10. The universe is either a confusion, and a mutual involution of things, and a dispersion ; or it is unity and order and ])rovidence. If then it is the former, why do I desire to tarry in a fortuitous combination of things and such a disorder ? and why do I care about anything else than how I shall at last become earth? and why am I disturbed, for the dispersion of my ele- ments will happen whatever I do. But if the other supposition is true, I venerate, and I am firm, and I trust in him who governs (iv. 27). 11. When thou hast been compelled by circum- stances to be distiu’bed in a manner, quickly return to thyself and do not continue out of tune longer than the com]uilsion lasts ; for thou wilt have more mastery over the harmony by continually recurring to it. 12. If thou hadst a step-mother and a mother at the same time, thou wouldst be dutiful to thy step-mother, but still thou wouldst constantly return to thy mother. Let the court and philosophy now be to thee step- mother and mother; return to philosophy frequently MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 193 and repose in her, through whom what thou meetest with in the court appears to thee tolerable, and thou appearest tolerable in the court. 13. When we have meat before us and such eatables, we receive the impression, that this is the dead body of a fish, and this is the dead body of a bird or of a pig ; and again, that this Falernian is only a little grape juice, and this purple robe some sheep’s wool dyed with the blood of a shell-fish ; such then are these im- pressions, and they reach the things themselves and penetrate them, and so we see what kind of things they are. Just in the same way ought we to act all through life, and where there are, things v,^hich appear most worthy of our approbation, Ave ought to lay them bare and look at their worthlessness and strip them of all the Avords by Avhicli they are exalted. For outAA-ard show is a wonderful perverter of the reason, and Avhen thou art most sure that thou art employed about things Avorth thy pains, it is then that it cheats thee most. Consider then AA^hat Crates says of Xenocrates himself. 14. Most of the things Avhich the multitude admire are referred to objects of the most general kind, those which are held together by cohesion or natural organi- zation, such as stones, Avood, fig-trees, vines, olives. But those which are admired by men, Avho are a little more reasonable, are referred to the things Avhich are held together by a living principle, as fiocks, herds. Those Avhich are admired by men Avho are still more instructed are the things Avhich are held together by a rational soul, not howe\"er a universal soul, but rational so far as it is a soul skilled in some art, or expert in some other way, or simply rational so far as it possesses a 194 TEE MEEITATI0N8 OF number of slaves. But he who values a rational soul, a soul universal and fitted for political life, regards nothing else except this ; and above all things he keeps his soul in a condition and in an activity conformable to reason and social life, and he co-operates to this end with those who are of the same kind as himself. 15. Some things are hurrying into existence, and others are hurrying out of it ; and of that which is coming into existence part is already extinguished. Motions and changes are continually renewing the world, just as the uninterrupted course of time is always renewing the infinite duration of ages. In this flowing stream then, on which there is no abiding, what is there of the things which hurry by on which a man would set a high price? It would be just as if a man should fall in love with one of the sparrows which fly by, but it has already passed out of sight. Something of this kind is the very life of every man, like the exhalation of the blood and the respiration of the air. For such as it is to have once drawn in the air and to have given it back, which we do every moment, just the same as it is with the whole respiratory power, which thou didst receive at thy birth yesterday and the day before, to give it back to the element from which thou didst first draw it. 16. Neither is transpiration, as in plants, a thing to be valued, nor respiration, as in domesticated animals and wild beasts, nor the receiving of impressions by the appearances of things, nor being moved by desires as puppets by strings, nor assembling in herds, nor being nourished by food ; for this is just like the act of separating and parting with the useless part of our food. What then is worth being valued? To here- MARCUS A UBELIUS ANTONINUS. 195 ceived with clapping of hands? ~No. hf either must we value the clapping of tongues for the praise which comes from the many is a clapping of tongues. Sup- pose then that thou hast given up this worthless thing called fame, what remains that is worth valuing ? This, in my opinion, to move thyself and to restrain thyself in conformity to thy proper constitution, to which end both all employments and arts lead. For every art aims at this, that the thing which has been made should be adapted to the work for which it has been made ; and both the vine-planter who looks after the vine, and the horse-breaker, and he who trains the dog, seek this end. But the education and the teach- ing of youth aim at something. In this then is the value of the education and the teaching. And if this is Avell, thou wilt not seek anything else. Wilt thou not cease to value many other things too? Then thou wilt be neither free, nor sufficient for thy own happi- ness, nor without passion. For of necessity thon must be envious, jealous, and suspicious of those who can take away those things, and plot against those who have that which is valued by thee. Of necessity a man must be altogether in a state of perturbation who Avants any of these things ; and besides, he must often find fault Avith the gods. But to reverence and honor thy OAvn mind Avill make thee content with thyself, and in harmony with society, and in agreement AAnth the gods, that is, praising all that they give and have ordered. 17. Above, beloAV, all around are the movements of the elements. But the motion of virtue is in none of these; it is something more divine, and advancing by a Avay hardly observed it goes happily on its road. 196 THE MEDITATIONS OF 18. How strangely men act. They will not praise those who are living at the same time and living with themselves ; but to be themselves praised by posterity, by those whom they have never seen or ever will see, this they set mnch value on. But this is very much the same as if thou shouldst be grieved because those who have lived before thee did not praise thee. 19. If a thing is difficult to be accomplished by thyself, do not think that it is impossible for man ; but if any- thing is possible for man and conformable to his nature, think that this can be attained by thyself too. 20. In the gymnastic exercises suppose that a man has torn thee with his nails, and by dashing against thy head has inflicted a wound. Well, we neither show any signs of vexation, nor are we offended, nor do we suspect him afterward as a treacherous fellow ; and yet we are on onr guard against him, not however as an enemy, nor yet with suspicion, but we quietly get out of his way. Something like this let thy be- havior be in all the other parts of life ; let us overlook many things in those who are like antagonists in the gymnasium. For it is in our power, as I said, to get out of the way, and to have no suspicion nor hatred. 21. If any man is able to convince me and show me that I do not think or act right, I will gladly change ; for I seek the truth by which no man was every in- jured. But he is injured who abides in his error and ignorance. 22. I do my duty: other things trouble me not; for they are either things without life, or things with- out reason, or things that have rambled and know not the way. 23. As to the animals which have no reason, and MARGVrS A URRLtUS ANTONiNUS. 197 generally all things and objects, do thou, since thou hast reason and they have none, make use of them with a generous and liberal spirit. But toward human beings, as they have reason, behave in a social spirit. And on all occasions call on the gods, and do not perplex thyself about the length of time in which thou shalt do this ; for even three hours so spent are sufficient. 24. Alexander the Macedonian and his groom by death were brought to the same state ; for either they were received among the same seminal principles of the universe, or they were alike dispersed among the atoms. 25. Consider how many things in the same indivisi- ble time take place in each of us, things which concern the body and things which concern the soul ; and so thou wilt not wonder if many more things, or rather all things which come into existence in that which is the one and all, which we call Cosmos, exist in it at the same time. 26. If any man should propose to thee the question, how the name Antoninus is written, wouldst thou with a straining of the voice utter each letter? What then if they grow angry, wilt thou be angry too? Wilt thou not go on with composure and number every letter? Just- so then in this life also remember that every duty is made up of certain parts. These it is th}^ duty to observe and without being disturbed or showing anger toward those who are angry with thee to go on thy way and finish that which is set before thee. 27. How cruel it is not to allow men to strive after the things which appear to them to be suitable to their 198 THE MEHlTATlONS OE nature and profitable ! And yet in a manner thou dost not allow them to do this, when thou art vexed because they do wrong. For they are certainly moved toward things because they suppose them to be suitable to their nature and profitable to them. But it is not so. Teach them then, and show them without being angry. 28. Death is a cessation of the impressions through the senses, and of the pulling of the strings which move the appetites, and of the discursive movements of the thoughts, and of the service to the flesh (ii. 12). 29. It is a shame for the soul to be first to give way in this life, when thy body does not give way. 30. Take care that thou art not made into a Caesar, that thou art not dyed witli this dye ; for such things happen. Keep thyself then simple, good, pure, serious, free from affectation, a friend of justice, a worshiper of the gods, kind, affectionate, strenuous in all proper acts. Strive to continue to be such as philosophy wished to make thee. Reverence the gods, and help men. Short is life. There is only one fruit of this terrene life, a pious disposition and social acts. Do everything as a disciple of Antoninus. Remember his constancy in every act wdiich was conformable to reason, and his evenness in all things, and his piet}^, and the serenity of his countenance, and his sweetness, and his disregard of empty fame, and his efforts to understand things ; and how he would never let any- thing pass without having first most carefully exam- ined it and clearly understood it ; and how he bore wdth those who blamed him unjustly without blaming them in return ; how he did nothing in a hurry ; and how he listened not to calumnies, and how exact an MABGUS A UBELIUS ANTONINUS. 199 examiner of manners and actions lie was; and not given to reproach people, nor timid, nor suspicious, nor a sophist ; and with how little he was satisfied, such as lodging, bed, dress, food, servants ; and how laborious and patient ; and how he was able on account of his sparing diet to hold out to the evening, not even requiring to relieve himself by any evacuations except at the usual hour ; and his firmness and uni- formity in his friendships; and how he tolerated freedom of speech in those who opposed his opinions ; and the pleasure that he had when any man showed him anything better ; and how religious he was with- out superstition. Imitate all this that thou mayest have as good a conscience, when thy last hour comes, as he had (i. 16). 31. Eeturn to thy sober senses and call thyself back ; and when thou hast roused thyself from sleep and hast perceived that they were only dreams which troubled thee, now in thy waking hours look at these [the things about thee] as thou didst look at those [the dreams]. 32. I consist of a little body and a soul. Now to this little body all things are indifferent, for it is not able to perceive differences. But to the understanding those things only are indifferent, which are not the Avorks of its own activity. But Avhatever things are the works of its own activity, all these are in its poAver. And of these, hoAvever, only those Avhich are done with reference to the present ; for as to the future and the past activities of the mind, even these are for the present indifferent. 33. Neither the labor Avhich the hand does nor that of the foot is contrary to nature, so long as the foot 200 THE MEDITATIONS OF does the foot’s work and the hand the hand’s. So then neither to a man as a man is his labor contrary to nature, so long as it does the things of a man. But if the labor is not contrary to his nature, neither is it an evil to him. 34. How many pleasures have been enjoyed by robbers, patricides, tyrants. 35. Dost thou not see how the handicraftsmen ac- commodate themselves up to a certain point to those who are not skilled in their craft — nevertheless they cling to the reason [the principles] of their art and do not endure to depart from it ? Is it not strange if the architect and the physician shall have more respect to the reason [the principles] of their own arts than man to his own reason, which is common to him and the gods ? 36. Asia, Europe are corners of the universe ; all the sea a drop in the universe ; Athos a little clod of the univ^erse ; all the present time is a point in eternity. All things are little, changeable, perishable. All things come from thence, from that universal ruling power either directly proceeding or by way of sequence. And accordingly the lion’s gaping jaws, and that which is poisonous, and every harmful thing, as a thorn, as mud, are after-products of the grand and beautiful. Do not then imagine that they are of another kind from that which thou dost venerate, but form a just opinion of the source of all (vii. 75). 37. He who has seen present things has seen all, both everything which has taken place from all eternity and everything which will be for time without end; for all things are of one kin and of one form. 38. Frequently consider the connection of all things in the universe and their relation to one another? For MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 201 in a manner all things are implicated with one another, and all in this way are friendly to one another ; for one thing comes in order after another, and this is by virtue of thef active movement and mutual conspira- tion and the unity of the substance (ix. 1). 39. Adapt thyself to the things with which thy lot has been cast; and the men among whom thou hast received thy portion, love them, but do it truh' [sincerely]. 40. Every instrument, tool, vessel, if it does that for which it has been made, is well, and yet he who made it is not there. But in the things which are held to- gether by nature there is within and there abides in them the power which made them ; wherefore the more is it fit to reverence this power, and to think, that, if thou dost live and act according to its will, everything in thee is in conformity to intelligence. And thus also in the universe the things which belong to it are in conformity to intelligence. 41. Whatever of the things which are not within th}'^ power thou shalt suppose to be good for thee or evil, it must of necessity be that, if such a bad thing befall thee or the loss of such a good thing, thou wilt blame the gods, and hate men too, those Avho are the cause of the misfortune or the loss, or those who are suspected of being likely to be the cause ; and indeed we do much injustice, because we make a difference between these things [because we do not regard these things as indifferentf]. But if we judge only those things which are in our power to be good or bad, there remains no reason either for finding fault with God or standing in a hostile attitude to man.* *Cicero, De Natura Beorum, iii. 33. 202 THE MEDITATIONS OE 42. We are all working together to one end, some with knowledge and design, and others without know- ing what they do ; as men also when they are asleep, of whom it is Heraclitus, I think, who says that they are laborers and co-operators in the things which take place in the universe. But men co-operate after dif- ferent fashions : and even those co operate abundantly, who find fault with what happens and those who try to oppose it and to hinder it ; for the universe had need even of such men as these. It remains then for thee to understand among what kind of workmen thou placest thyself ; for he who rules all things will cer- tainly make a right use of thee, and he will receive thee among some part of the co-operators and of those whose labors conduce to one end. But be not thou such a part as the mean and ridiculous verse in the pla}% which Chiysippus speaks of.* 43. Does the sun undertake to do the work of the rain, or Hisculapius the work of the Fruit-bearer [the earth] ? And how is it with respect to each of the stars, are they not different, and yet they work to- gether to the same end ? 44. If the gods have determined about me and about the things which must happen to me, they have de- termined well, for it is not easy even to imagine a deity without forethought ; and as to doing me harm, Avhy should they have any desire toward that? foi‘ what advantage \vould result to them from this or to the whole, which is the special object of their j^rovi- dence? But if they have not determined about me individuall 3 g they have certainly determined about the whole at least, and the things which happen by wa_y *Plutarcli, adversus Stoicos, c. 14. MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 203 of sequence in this general arrangement I ought to accept with pleasure and to be content Avith them. But if they determine about nothing — which it is Avicked to believe, or if we do belicAm it, let us neither sacrifice nor pray nor swear by them, nor do anything else Avhich Ave do as if the gods Avere present and lived Avith us — but if, hoAvever, the gods determine about none of the things which concern us, I am able to determine about myself, and I can inquire about that which is useful ; and that is useful to every man Avhich is conformable to his OAvn constitution and nature. But my nature is rational and social ; and my city and country, so far as I am Antoninus, is Rome, but so far as I am a man, it is the Avorld. The things then Avhich are useful to these cities are alone useful to me. 45. Whatever happens to every man, this is for the interest of the universal ; this might be sufficient. But further thou Avilt observe this also as a general truth, if thou dost observe, that AvhateAmr is profitable to any man is profitable also to other men. But let the Avord profitable be taken here in the common sense as said of things of the middle kind [neither good nor bad]. 46. As it hajApens to thee in the amphitheater and such places, that the continual sight of the same things and the uniformity make the spectacle Aveari- some, so it is in the Avhole of life ; for all things above, below, are the same and from the same. How long then ? 47. Think continually that all kinds of men and of all kinds of pursuits and of all nations are dead, so that thy thoughts come doAAm even to Philistion and Phoebus and Origanion. Noav turn th}'’ thoughts to the other kinds [of men]. To that place then Ave 204 THE MEDITATIONS OF must remove, where there are so many great orators, and so many noble philosophers, Heraclitus, Pytha- goras, Socrates ; so many heroes of former days, and so many generals after them, and tyrants ; besides these, Eudoxus, Hipparchus, Archimedes, and other men of acute natural talents, great minds, lovers of labor, versatile, confident, mockers even of the perish- able and ephemeral life of man, as Menippus and such as are like him. As to all these consider that they have long been in the dust. What harm then is this to them ; and what to those whose names are alto- gether unknown? One thing here is worth a great deal, to pass thy life in truth and justice, with a benevo- lent disposition even to liars and unjust men. 48. When thou Avishest to delight thyself, think of the virtues of those who live Avith thee ; for instance, the activity of one, and the modesty of another, and the liberality of a third, and some other good quality of a fourth. For nothing delights so much as the examples of the virtues, Avhen they are exhibited in the morals of those Avho live with us and present them- selves in abundance, as far as is possible. Wherefore Ave must keep them before us. 49. Thou art not dissatisfied, I suppose, because thou Aveighest only so many litre and not three hundred. Be not dissatisfied then that thou must live only so many years and not more ; for as thou art satisfied Avith the amount of substance which has been assigned to thee, so be content Avith the time. 50. Let us try to persuade them [men]. But act eA^en against their Avill, Avhen the principles of justice lead that way. If, hoAvever, any man by using force stands in thy Avay, betake thyself to contentment and MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 205 tranquillity, and at the same time employ the hinderance toward the exercise of some other virtue ; and remember that thy attempt was with a reservation [conditionally], that thou didst not desire to do impos- sibilities. What then didst thou desire? Some such effort as this. But thou attainest thy object, if the things to which thou wast moved are [not] accomplished.f 61. He who loves fame considers another man’s activity to be his own good ; and he who loves pleasure, his own sensations; but he who has under- standing, considers his own acts to be his own good. 52. It is in our power to have no opinion about a thing, and not to be disturbed in our soul ; for things themselves have no natural power to form our judgments. 53. Accustom thyself to attend carefully to what is said by another, and as much as it is possible, be in the speaker’s mind. 5d. That which is not good for the swarm, neither is it good for the bee. 55. If sailors abused the helmsman or the sick tlie doctor, would they listen to anybody else ; or how could the helmsman secure the safety of those in the ship or the doctor the health of those vdiom he attends ? 56. How many together with whom I came into the world are already gone out of it. 57. To the jaundiced honey tastes bitter, and to those bitten by mad dogs water causes fear ; and to little children the ball is a fine thing. Why then am I angry? Dost thou think that a false opinion has less power than the bile in the jaundiced or the poison in him who is bitten by a mad dog. 206 THE MEDITATIONS OF 58. No man will hinder thee from living according to the reason of thy own nature : nothing will happen to thee contrary to the reason of the universal nature. 59. What kind of people are those whom men Avish to please, and for Avhat objects, and by Avhat kind of acts ? How soon Avill time cover all things, and how many it has covered already. MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 207 VII. "What is badness? It is that which thou hast often seen. And on the occasion of everything which happens keep this in mind, that it is that which thou hast often seen. Everywhere up and down thou wilt find the same things, with which the old histories are filled, those of the middle ages and those of our own day; with which cities and houses are filled now. There is nothing new ; all things are both familiar and short lived. 2. How can our principles become dead, unless the impressions [thoughts] which correspond to them are extinguished? But it is in thy power continuously to fan these thoughts into a flame. I can have that opinion about anything, which I ought to have. If I can, why am I disturbed? The things which are ex- ternal to my mind have no relation at all to my mind. Let this be the state of thy affects, and thou standest erect. To recover thy life is in thy power. Look at things again as thou didst use to look at them ; for in this consists the recovery of thy life. ' 3. The idle business of show, plays on the stage, flocks of sheep, herds, exercises with spears, a bone cast to little dogs, a bit of bread into fish-ponds, laborings of ants and burden-carrying, runnings about of fright- ened little mice, puppets pulled by strings — [all alike]. It is thy duty then in the midst of such things to show ‘>08 THE MEDITATIONS OE good humor and not a proud air ; to understand, how- ever, that every man is worth just so much as the things are worth about which he busies himself. d. In discourse thou must attend to what is said, and ill every movement thou must observe what is doing. And in tlie one thou shouldst see immediately to what end it refers, but in the other watch carefully what is the thing signified. 5. Is my understanding sufficient for this or not? If it is sufficient I use it for the work as an instrument given by the universal nature. But if it is not suffi- cient, then either I retire from the work and give way to him who is able to do it better, unless there be some reason why I ought not to do so ; or I do it as well as I can, taking to help me the man who with the aid of my ruling principle can do what is now fit and useful for the general good. For whatsoever either by myself or with another I can do, ought to be directed to this only, to that ivhich is useful and well-suited to society. 6. How many after being celebrated by fame have been given up to oblivion; and how many who have celebrated the fame of others have long been dead. 7. Be not ashamed to be helped ; for it is thy busi- ness to do thy duty like a soldier in the assault on a town. How then, if being lame thou canst not mount up on the battlements alone, but with the help of another it is possible? 8. Let not future things disturb thee, for thou wilt come to them, if it shall be necessary, having with thee the same reason which now thou usest for present things. 9. All things are implicated with one another, and the bond is holy ; and there is hardly anything uncon- MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 209 nected with any other thing. For things have been co-ordinated, and they combine to form the same uni- verse [order]. For there is one universe made up of all things, and one god who pervades all things, and one substance, and one law, [one] common reason in all intelligent animals, and one truth ; if indeed there is also one perfection for all animals which are of the same stock and participate in the same reason. 10. Everything material soon disappears in the sub- stance of the whole ; and everything formal [causal] is very soon taken back into the universal reason ; and the memory of everything is very soon overwhelmed in time. 11. To the rational animal the same act is according to nature and according to reason. 12. Be thou erect, or be made erect (iii. 5). 13. Just as it is with the members in those bodies which are united in one, so it is with rational beings which exist separate, for they have been constituted for one co-operation. And the perception of this will be more apparent to thee, if thou often sayest to thy- self that I am a member [//fAos] of the system of rational beings. But if [using the letter r] thou sayest that thou art a part [Af'po?], thou dost not yet love men from thy heart ; beneficence does not yet delight thee for its own sake; thou still doest it barely as a thing of propriety, and not yet as doing good to thyself. 14. Let there fall externally what will on the parts which can feel the effects of this fall. For those parts which have felt will complain, if they choose. But I, unless I think that what has happened is an evil, am not injured. And it is in my power not to think so. 15. Whatever any one does or says, I must be good. 210 THE MEDITATIONS OF just as if the gold, or the emerald, or the purple were always saying this. Whatever any one does or says, I must be emerald and keep my color. 16. The ruling faculty does not disturb itself; I mean, does not frighten itself or cause itself pain.f But if any one else can frighten or pain it, let him do so. For the faculty itself will not by its own opinion turn itself into such ways. Let the body itself take care, if it can, that it suffer nothing, and let it speak, if it suffers. But the soul itself, that wdnch is subject to fear, to pain, Avhich has completely the power of forming an opinion about these things, wdll suffer nothing, for it will never deviate into such a judgment. The leading principle in itself wants nothing, unless it makes a want for itself ; and therefore it is both free from perturbation and unimpeded, if it does not dis' turb and imjiede itself. 17. Eudminonia [happiness] is a good demon, or a good thing. What then art thou doing here, O imagination ? go away, I entreat thee by the gods, as thou didst come, for I want thee not. But thou aid come according to thy old fashion. I am not angry with thee ; only go away. 18. Is any man afraid of change? Why what can take place without change ? What then is more pleas- ing' or more suitable to the universal nature? And canst thou take a bath unless the wood undergoes a change ? And canst thou be nourished, unless the food undergoes a change ? And can anything else that is useful be accomplished without change? Dost thou not see then that for thj^self also to change is just the same, and equally necessary for the universal nature? 19. Through the universal substance as through a MABC JIS A JlRELim ANTONINUS. 211 furious torrent all bodies are carried, being by their nature united with and co-operating with the whole, as the parts of our body with one another. How many a Chr}"sippus, how many a Socrates, how many an Epictetus has time already swallowed up? And let the same thought occur to thee with reference to every man and thing (v. 23 ; vi. 15). 20. One thing only troubles me, lest I should do something which the constitution of man does not allow, or in the way which it does not allow, or what it does not allow now. 21. Hear is thy forgetfulness of all things ; and near the forgetfulness of thee by all. 22. It is peculiar to man to love even those who do wrong. And this happens, if when they do wrong it occurs to thee that they are kinsmen, and that they do wrong through ignorance and unintentionally, and that soon both of you will die ; and above all, that the wrong-doer has done thee no harm, for he has not made thy ruling faculty worse than it was before. 23. The universal nature out of the universal sub- stance, as if it were wax, now molds a horse, and when it has broken this up, it uses the material for a tree, then for a man, then for something else ; and each of these things subsists for a very short time. But it is no hardship for the vessel to be broken up, just as there was none in its being fastened together (viii. 50). 24. A scowling look is altogether unnatural ; when it is often assumed,* the result is that all comeliness dies away, and at last is so completely extinguished that it cannot be again lighted up at all. Try to con- * This is corrupt. 213 THE MEDITATIONS OE elude from this very fact that it is contrary to reason. For if even the perception of doing wrong shall depart, what reason is there for living any longer ? 25. Nature which governs the whole will soon change all things which thou seest, and out of their substance will make other things, and again other things from the substance of them, in order that the world may be ever new (xii. 23). 26. When a man has done thee an}’- wrong, imme- diately consider with what opinion about good or evil he has done wrong. For when thou hast seen this, thou wilt pity him, and wilt neither wonder nor be angry. For either thou thyself thinkest the same thing to be good that he does, or another thing of the same kind. It is thy duty then to pardon him. But if thou dost not think such things to be good or evil, thou wilt more readily be well disposed to him who is in error. 27. Think not so much of what thou hast not as of what thou hast : but of the things which thou hast select the best, and then reflect how eagerly they would have been sought, if thou hadst them not. At the same time, however, take care that thou dost not through being so pleased Avith them accustom thyself to overvalue them, so as to be disturbed if ever thou shouldst not have them. 28. Retire into thyself. The rational principle Avhich rules has this nature, that it is content with itself when it does Avhat is just, and so secures tranquillity. 29. Wipe out the imagination. Stop the pulling of the strings. Confine thyself to the present. Under- stand well what happens either to thee or to another. Divide and distribute every object into the casual MARCUS A URELIUS ANTOMINUS. 213 [formal] and the material. Think of thy last hour. Let the wrong which is done by a man stay there where the wrong was done (viii. 29). 30. Direct thy attention to what is said. Let thy understanding enter into the things that are doing and the things which do them (vii. 4). 31. Adorn th3'Self with simplicity and modesty and with indifference toward the things which lie between virtue and vice. Love mankind. Follow God. The poet says that Law rules all.f And it is enough to remember that law rules all.* 32. About death : whether it is a dispersion, or a resolution into atoms, or annihilation, it is either extinction or change. 33. About pain : the pain which is intolerable carries us off ; but that which lasts a long time is tolerable ; and the mind maintains its own tranquillity b}'' retiring into itself,f and the ruling faculty is not made worse. But the parts which are harmed by pain, let them, if they can, give their opinion about it. 34. About fame : look at the minds [of those who seek fame], observe what they are, and what kind of things they avoid, and what kind of things they pursue. And consider that as the heaps of sand piled on one another hide the former sands, so in life the events which go before are soon covered by those which come after. 35. From Plato : ]; the man who has an elevated mind and takes a view of all time and of all substance, dost thou suppose it possible for him to think that human life is anything great? It is not possible, he * The end of this section is unintelligible. I Plato, Pol. vi. 486. 214 TEE MEDITATIONS OF said. Such a man then will think that death also is no evil. Certainly not. 36. From Antisthenes : It is royal to do good and to be abused. 37. It is a base thing for the countenance to be obedient and to regulate and compose itself as the mind commands, and for the mind not to be regulated and composed by itself. 38. It is not right to vex ourselves at things, For they care nought about it.* * * § 39. To the immortal gods and us give joy. 40. Life must be reaped like the ripe ears of corn : One man is born ; another dies.j; 41. If gods care not for me and for my children, There is a reason for it. 42. For the good is with me, and the just.§ 43. No joining others in their wailing, no violent emotion. 44. From Plato :|| But I would make this man a sufficient answer, which is this: Thou sayest not w^ell, if thou thinkest that a man who is good for anything at all ought to compute the hazard of life or death, and should not rather look to this only in all that he does, whether he is doing what is just or unjust, and the works of a good or a bad man. 45. ||For thus it is, men of Athens, in truth; wher- * From tlie Belleroplion of Euripides. I From tlie Hypsipyle of Euripides. Cicero (TuscuL iii. 25), has translated six lines from Euripides, and among them are these two lines : Reddenda terras est terra : turn vita omnibus Metenda ut fruges : Sic jubet necessitas. § See Aristophanes, Acharnenses, v. 661. I From the Apologia, c. 16. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 215 ever a man has placed himself thinking it the best place for him, or has been placed by a commander, there in my opinion he ought to stay and to abide the hazard, taking nothing into the reckoning, either death or anything else, before the baseness [of deserting his post]. 46. But, my good friend, reflect whether that which is noble and good is not something different from saving and being saved ; for as to a man living such or such a time, at least one who is really a man, consider if this is not a thing to be dismissed from the thoughts : and there must be no love of life: but as to these matters a man must intrust them to the deity and believe what the women say, that no man can escape his destiny, the next inquiry being how he may best live the time that he has to live.* 47. Look round at the courses of the stars, as if thou wert going along with them ; and constantly consider the changes of the elements into one another ; for such thoughts purge away the filth of the terrene life. 48. This is a flne saying of Plato That he who is discoursing about men should look also at earthly things as if he viewed them from some higher place ; should look at them in their assembles, armies, agri- cultural labors, marriages, treaties, births, deaths, noise of the courts of justice, desert places, various nations of barbarians, feasts, lamentations, markets, a mixture of all things and an orderly combination of contraries. 49. Consider the past ; such great changes of polit- ical supremacies. Thou mayest foresee also the things which will be. For they will certainly be of like form. * Plato, Gorgias, c. 68 (512). t It is said that this is not in the extant writings of Plato. 216 TEE MEDITATIONS OF and it is not possible that they should deviate from the order of the things which take place now : accordingly to have contemplated human life for forty years is the same as to have contemplated it for ten thousand years. For what more wilt thou see? 50. That which has grown from the earth to the earth, But that which has sprung from heavenly seed, Back to the heavenly realms returns.* This is either a dissolution of the mutual involution of the atoms, or a similar dispersion of the unsentient elements. 51. With food and drinks and cunning magic arts Turning the channel’s course to ’scape from death.:]; The breeze which heaven has sent We must endure, and toil without complaining. 52. Another may be more expert in casting his opponent ; but he is not more social, nor more modest, nor better disciplined to meet all that happens, nor more considerate with respect to the faults of his neighbors. 53. Where any work can be done conformably to the reason which is common to gods and men, there we have nothing to fear ; for where we are able to get profit by means of the activity which is successful and proceeds according to our constitution, there no harm is to be suspected. 54. Everywhere and at all times it is in thy power piously to acquiesce in thy present condition, and to behave justly to those who are about thee, and to * From tlie Chrysippus of Euripides. t The first two lines are from the Supplices of Euripides, v. 1110. MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 211 exert thy skill upon thy present thoughts, that nothing shall steal into them without being well examined. 55. Do not look around thee to discover other men’s ruling principles, but look straight to this, to what nature leads thee, both the universal nature through the things which happen to thee, and thy own nature through the acts which must be done by thee. But every being ought to do that which is according to its constitution ; and all other things have been consti- tuted for the sake of rational beings, just as among irrational things the inferior for the sake of the superior, but the rational for the sake of one another. The prime principle then in man’s constitution is the social. And the second is not to yield to the per- suasions of the body, for it is the peculiar office of the rational and intelligent motion to circumscribe itself, and never to be overpowered either by the motion of the senses or of the appetites, for both are animal ; but the intelligent motion claims superiority and does not permit itself to be overpowered by the others. And with good reason, for it is formed by nature to use all of them. The third thing in the I’ational constitution is freedom from error and from deception. Let then the ruling principle holding fast to these things go straight on, and it has what is its own. 56. Consider thyself to be dead, and to have com- pleted thy life up to the present time ; and live accord- ing to nature the remainder which is allowed thee. 57. Love that only which happens to thee and is spun with the thread of thy destiny. For what is more suitable ? 58. In everything which happens keep before thy eyes those to whom the same things happened, and 218 TEE MEDITATIONS OF how they were vexed, and treated them as strange things, and found fault with them ; and now where are they? Nowhere. Why then dost thou too choose to act in the same way ? and why dost thou not leave these agitations which are foreign to nature, to those who cause them and those who are moved by them ? And why art thou not altogether intent upon the right Avay of making use of the things which happen to thee? for then thou wilt use them well, and they Avill be a material for thee [to work on]. Only attend to thyself, and resolve to be a good man in every act which thou doest ; and remember * 59. Look within. Within is the fountain of good, and it will ever bubble up, if thou wilt ever dig. 60. The body ought to be compact, and to show no irregularity either in motion or attitude. For what the mind shows in the face by maintaining in it the expression of intelligence and propriety, that ought to be required also in the whole body. But all these things should be observed without affectation. 61. The art of life is more like the wrestler’s art than the dancer’s, in respect of this, that it should stand ready and firm to meet onsets which are sudden and unexpected. 62. Constantly observe who those are whose appro- bation thou wishest to have, and what ruling prin- ciples they possess. For then thou wilt neither blame those who offend involuntarily, nor wilt thou want their approbation, if thou lookest to the sources of their o])inions and appetites. * This section is obscure, and the conclusion is so corrupt that it 3s impossible to give any probable meaning to it. It is better to leave it as it is than to patch it up, as some critics and translators have done. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 219 63. Every soul, the philosopher says, is involuntarily deprived of truth ; consequently in the same u^ay it is deprived of justice and temperance and benevolence and everything of the kind. It is most necessary to bear this constantly in mind, for thus thou wilt be more gentle toward all. 14. In every pain let this thought be present, that there is no dishonor in it, nor does it make the govern- ing intelligence worse, for it does not damage the intelligence either so far as the intelligence is rational or so far as it is social. Indeed in the case of most pains let this remark of Epicurus aid thee, that pain is neither intolerable nor everlasting, if thou bearest in mind that it has its limits, and if thou addest nothing to it in imagination : and remember this, too, that we do not perceive that many things which are disagree- able to us are the same as pain, such as excessive drowsi- ness, and the being scorched by heat, and the having no appetite. When then thou art discontented about any of these things, say to thyself, that thou art yielding to pain. 65. Take care not to feel toward the inhuman, as they feel toward men. 66. How do we know if Telauges was not superior in character to Socrates ? for it is not enough that Socrates died a more noble death, and disputed more skillfully with the sophists, and passed the night in the cold with more endurance, and that when he was bid to arrest Leon* of Salamis, he considered it more noble to refuse, and that he walked in a swaggering * Leon of Salamis. See Plato, Epist, 7 ; Apolog. c. 30 ; Epic- tetus, iv. 1, 160; iv. 7, 30. 220 THE MEDITATIONS OF way in the streets’’'— though as to this fact one may have gTeat doubts if it was true. But we ought to inquire, what kind of a soul it was that Socrates pos- sessed, and if he was able to be content with being just toward men and pious toward the gods, neither idly vexed on account of men’s villainy, nor yet making himself a slave to any man’s ignorance, nor receiving as strange anything that fell to his share out of the universal, nor enduring it as intolerable, nor allowing his understanding to sympathize with the affects of the miserable flesh. 67. Nature has not so mingledf [the intelligence] with the composition of the body, as not to have allowed thee the power of circumscribing thyself and of bring- ing under subjection to thyself all that is thy own; for it is very possible to be a divine man and to be recognized as such by no one. Always bear this in mind ; and another thing too, that very little indeed is necessary for living a happy life. And because thou hast despaired of becoming a dialectician and skilled in the knowledge of nature, do not for this reason re- nounce the hope of being both free and modest and social and obedient to God. 68. It is in thy power to live free from all compul- sion in the greatest tranquillity of mind, even if all the world cry out against thee as much as they choose, and even if wild beasts tear in pieces the members of this kneaded matter which has grown around thee. For what hinders the mind in the midst of all this from maintaining itself in tranquillity, and in a just judgment of all surrounding things, and in a ready use of the objects which are presented to it, so that Aristophan, Nub. 363. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 221 the judgment may say to the thing which falls under its observation: This thou art in substance [reality], though in men’s o]iinion thou mayest appear to be of a different kind ; and the use shall say to that which falls under the hand : Thou art the thing that I was seeking ; for to me that which presents itself is always a material for virtue, both rational and political, and, in a word, for the exercise of art, which belongs to man or God. For everthing which happens has a relationship either to God or man, and is neither new nor difficult to handle, but usual and apt matter to work on. 69. The perfection of moral character consists in this, in passing every day as the last, and in being neither violently excited, nor torpid, nor playing the hypocrite. 70. The gods who are immortal are not vexed be- cause during so long a time they must tolerate contin- ually men such as they are and so many of them bad ; and besides this, they also take care of them in all ways. But thou, who art destined to end so soon, art thou wearied of enduring the bad, and this too when thou art one of them ? 71. It is a ridiculous thing for a man not to fly from, his own badness, which is indeed possible, but to fl}^ from other men’s badness, which is impossible. 72. Whatever the rational and political [social] faculty finds to be neither intelligent nor social, it properly judges to be inferior to itself. 73. When thou hast done a good act and another has received it, why dost thou still look for a third thing besides these, as fools do, either to have the reputation of having done a good act or to obtain a return ? 222 THE MEDITATIONS OF 74. No man is tired of receiving what is useful. But it is useful to act according to nature. Do not then be tired of receiving what is useful by doing it to others. 75. The nature of the All moved to make the uni- verse. But now either everything that takes place comes by way of consequence or [continuity] ; or even the chief things toward which the ruling power of the universe directs its own movement are governed by no rational principle. If this is remembered it will make thee more tranquil in many things (vi. 44 ; ix. 28 j.* * It is not easy to understand this section. It has been suggested that there is some error in aX6yi6ra, etc. Some of the trans- lators have made nothing of the passage, and they have somewhat perverted the words. The first proposition is, that the universe was made by some sufficient power. A beginning of the universe is assumed, and a power 'which framed an order. The next question is. How are things produced now; or, in other words, by what power do forms appear in continuous succession ? The answer, according to Antoninus, may be this: It is by virtue of the original constitution of things that all change and succession have been effected and are effected. And this is intelligible in a sense, if we admit that the universe is always one and the same, a continuity of identity; as much one and the same as man is one and the same, which he believes himself to be, though he also believes, and cannot help believ- ing, that both in his body and in his thoughts there is change and succession. There is no real discontinuity then in the universe ; and if we say that there was an order framed in the beginning and that the things which are now produced are a consequence of a previous arrangement, we speak of things as we are compelled to view them, as forming a series or succession ; just as we speak of the changes in our own bodies and the sequence of our own thoughts. But as there are no intervals, not even intervals infinitely small, between any two supposed states of any one thing, so there are no intervals, not even infinitely small, between what we call one thing and any Other thing which we speak of as immediately preceding or follow- MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 223 ing it. What we call time is an idea derived from our notion of a succession of things or events, an idea which is a part of our con- stitution, but not an idea which we can suppose to belong to an infinite intelligence and power. The conclusion then is certain that the present and the past, the production of present things and the supposed original order, out of which we say that present things now come, are one ; and the present productive power and the so- called past arrangement are only different names for one thing. I suppose then that Antoninus wrote here as people sometimes talk now, and that his real meaning is not exactly expressed by his words. There are certainly other passages from which, 1 think, that we may collect that he had notions of production something like what 1 have expressed. We now come to the alternative : “or even the chief things . . . principle.” I do not exactly know what he means by rd nvpiQbrara, “the chief,” or “the most excellent,” or whatever it is. But as he speaks elsewhere of inferior and superior things, and of the inferior being for the use of the superior, and of rational beings being the highest, he may here mean rational beings. He also, in this alternative, assumes a governing power of the universe, and that it acts by directing its power toward these chief objects, or making its special, proper, motion toward them. And here he uses the noun (bpprf) “movement,” which contains the same notion as the verb {Spprjde) “moved,” which he used at the beginning of the paragraph when he was speaking of the making of the universe. If we do not accept the first hypothesis, he says, we must take the con- clusion of the second, that the ‘ ‘ chief things toward which the ruling power of the universe directs its own movement are governed by no rational principle.” The meaning then is, if there is a mean- ing in it, that though there is a governing power, which strives to give effect to its efforts, we must conclude that there is no rational direction of anything, if the power which first made the universe does not in some way govern it still. Besides, if we assume that anything is now produced or now exists without the action of the supreme intelligence, and yet that this intelligence makes an effort to act, we obtain a conclusion which cannot be reconciled with the nature of a supreme power, whose existence Antoninus always assumes. The tranquillity that a man may gain from these reflec- tions must result from his rejecting the second hypothesis, and accepting the first ; whatever may be the exact sense in which the emperor understood the first. Or, as he says elsewhere, if there is THE MEDITATIONS OF ■lU no providence which governs the world, man has at least the power of governing himself according to the constitution of his nature ; and so he may he tranquil, if he does the best that he can. If there is no error in the passage, it is worth the labor to dis- cover the writer’s exact meaning ; for I think that he had a meaning, though people may not agree what it was. (Compare ix. 28.) If I have rightly explained the emperor’s meaning in this and other pas- sages, he has touched the solution of a great question. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 225 VIII. This reflection also tends to the removal of the desire of empty fame, that it is no longer in thy power to have lived the whole of thy life, or at least thy life from thy youth upward, like a philosopher; but both to many others and to thyself it is plain that thou art far from philosophy. Thou hast fallen into disorder then, so that it is no longer easy for thee to get the reputation of a philosopher ; and thy plan of life also opposes it. If then thou hast truly seen where the matter lies, throw away the thought. How thou shalt seem [to others], and be coutent if thou shalt live the rest of thy life in such wise as thy nature wills. Observe then what it wills, and let nothing else distract thee ; for thou hast had experience of many wander- ings without having found happiness anyivliere, not in syllogisms, nor in wealth, nor in reputation, nor in enjoyment, nor anywhere. Where is it then? In doing what man’s nature requires. How then shall a man do this ? If he has principles from which come his affects and his acts. What principles? Those which relate to good and bad : the belief that there is nothing good for man, which does not make him just, temperate, manly, free ; and that there is nothing bad, which does not do the contrary to what has been mentioned. 2. On the occasion of every act ask thyself, Hoav is 226 THE MEDITATIONS OP this with respect to me ? Shall I repent of it ? A little time and I am dead, and all is gone. What more do I seek, if what I am now doing is the work of an intelligent living being, and a social being, and one who is under the same law with God? 3. Alexander and Caius* and Pompeius, what are they in comparison with Diogenes and Heraclitus and Socrates? For they were acquainted with things, and their causes [forms], and their matter, and the ruling principles of these men were the same [or conformable to their pursuits]. But as to the others, how many things had they to care for, and to how many things were they slaves. 4. [Consider] that men will do the same things nevertheless, even though thou shouldst burst. 5. This is the chief thing : Be not perturbed, for all things are according to the nature of the universal ; and in a little time thou wilt be nobody and nowhere, like Hadrianus and Augustus. In the next place having fixed thy eyes steadily on thy business look at it, and at the same time remembering that it is thy duty to be a good man, and what man’s nature demands, do that without turning aside ; and speak as it seems to thee most just, only let it be with a good disposition and with modesty and without hypocrisy. 6. The nature of the universal has this work to do, to remove to that place the things which are in this, to change them, to take them away hence, and to carry them there. All things are change, yet we need not fear anything new. All things are familiar [to us] ; but the distribution of them still remains the same. *Caius is C. Julius Caesar, the dictator; and Pompeius is Cn. Pompeius, named Magnus. MARC US A URELtUS ANTONINUS. 221 7. Every nature is contented with itself when it goes on its way well ; and a rational nature goes on its way well, when in its thoughts it assents to nothing false or uncertain, and when it directs its movements to social acts only, and when it confines its desires and aversions to the things which are in its power, and when it is satisfied with everything that is assigned to it by the common nature. For of this common nature every particular nature is a part, as the nature of the leaf is a part of the nature of the plant ; except that in the plant the nature of the leaf is part of a nature which has not perception or reason, and is subject to be impeded ; but the nature of man is part of a nature Avhich is not subject to impediments, and is intelligent and just, since it gives to everything in equal portions and according to its worth, times, substance, cause [form], activity, and incident. But examine, not to discover that any one thing compared with any other single thing is equal in all respects, but by taking all the parts together of one thing and comparing them with all the parts together of another. 8. Thou hast not leisure [or ability] to read. But thou hast leisure [or ability] to check arrogance : thou hast leisui’e to be superior to pleasure and pain : thou hast leisure to be superior to love of fame, and not to be vexed at stupid and ungrateful people, nay even to care for them. 9. Let no man any longer hear thee finding fault with the court life or with thy own (v. 16). 10. Repentance is a kind of self-reproof for having neglected something useful ; but that which is good must be something useful, and the perfect good man should look after it. But no such man would ever 228 THE MEDITATIONS OF repent of having refused any sensual pleasure. Pleasure then is neither good nor useful. 11. This thing, what is it in itself, in its own consti- tution? What is its substance and material? And what its causal nature [or form] ? And what is it doing in the world ? And how long does it subsist? 12. When thou risest from sleep Avith reluctance, remember that it is according to thy constitution and according to human nature to perform social acts, but sleeping is common also to irrational animals. But that Avhich is according to each individual’s nature is also more peculiarly its OAvn, and inore suitable to its nature, and, indeed, also more agreeable (v. 1). 13. Constantly and, if it be possible, on the occasion of every impression on the soul, apply to it the princi- ples of Physic, of Ethic, and of Dialectic. 14. Whatever man thou meetest Avith, immediately say to thyself : What opinions has this man about good and bad? For if Avith respect to pleasure and pain and the causes of each, and Avith respect to fame and ignominy, death and life he has such and such opinions, it Avill seem nothing wonderful or strange to me, if he does such and such things ; and I shall bear in mind that he is compelled to do so.* 15. Eemember that as it is a shame to be surprised if the fig-tree produces figs, so it is to be surprised if the AAmrld produces such and such things of which it is productive ; and for the physician and the helms- man it is a shame to be surprised, if a man has a fever, or if the Avind is unfaAmrable. 16. Eemember that to change thy opinion and to folloAv him Avho corrects thy error is as consistent Avith * Antoninus V. 16. Thucydides, iii. 10. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 229 freedom as it is to persist- in thy error. For it is thy own, the activity which is exerted according to thy own movement and judgment, and indeed according to thy own understanding too. 17. If a thing is in thy own power, why dost thou do it ? but if it is in the power of another, w^hom dost thou blame ? the atoms [chance] or the gods ? Both are foolish. Thou must blame nobody. For if thou canst, correct [that which is the cause] ; but if thou canst not do this, correct at least the thing itself ; but if thou canst not do even this, of what use is it to thee to find fault? for nothing should be done without a purpose. 18. That which has died falls not out of the universe. If it stays here, it also changes here, and is dis- solved into its proper parts, which are elements of the universe and of thyself. And these too change, and they murmur not. 19. Everything exists for some end, a horse, a vine. Why dost thou wonder ? Even the sun will say, I am for some purpose, and the rest of the gods will say the same. For what purpose then art thou? To enjoy pleasure ? See if common sense allows this. 20. ^Nature has had regard in everything no less to the end than to the beginning and the continuance, just like the man who throws up a ball. What good is it then for the ball to be thrown up, or harm for it to come down, or even to have fallen ? And what good is it to the bubble while it holds together, or what harm when it is burst ? The same may be said of a light also. 21. Turn it [the body] inside out, and see what kind of thing it is; and when it has grown old, what kind of thing it becomes, and when it is diseased. 230 \ fHE MEDITATIONS OE Short lived are both the praiser and the praised, and the rememberer and the remembered : and all this in a nook of this part of the world ; and not even here do all agree, no, not any one with himself : and the whole earth too is a point. 22. Attend to the matter which is before thee, whether it is an opinion or an act or a word. Thou sulferest this justly: for thou choosest rather to become good to-morrow than to be good to-day. 23. Am I doing anything? I do it Avith reference to the good of mankind. Does anything happen to me? I receive it and refer it to the gods, and the scource of all things, from which all that happens is derived. 24. Such as bathing appears to thee — oil, SAA^eat, dirt, filthy Avater, all things disgusting — so is every part of life and everything. 25. Lucilla saw Verus die, and then Lucilla died. Secunda saAV Maximus die, and then Secunda died. Epitynchanus saAV Diotimus die, and then Epityncha- nus died. Antoninus saAV Faustina die, and then Antoninus died. Such is everything. Celer saAV Hadrianus die, and then Celer died. And those sharp- Avitted men, either seers or men inflated Avith pride, Avhere are they ? for instance, the sharp-Avitted men, Charax and Demetrius the Platonist and Eudmmon, and any one else like them. All ephemeral, dead long ago. Some indeed have not been remembered even for a short time, and others have become the heroes of fables, and again others liaA^e disappeared eA'en from fables. Remember this, then, that this little com- pound, thyself, must either be dissolved, or thy poor breath must be extinguished, or be remoA^ed and placed elseAvhere. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 231 26. It is satisfaction to a man to do the proper works of a man. Now it is a proper work of a man to be benevolent to his own kind, to despise the movements of the senses, to form a just judgment of plausible appearances, and to take a survey of the nature of the universe and of the things which happen in it. 27. There are three relations [between thee and other things] : the one to the body which surrounds thee ; the second to the divine cause from which all things come to all ; and the third to those who live with thee. 28. Pain is either an evil to the body — then let the body say what it thinks of it — or to the soul ; but it is in the power of the soul to maintain its own serenity and tranquillity, and not to think that pain is an evil. For every judgment and movement and desire and aversion is within, and no evil ascends so high. 29. Wipe out thy imaginations by often saying to thyself : now it is in my power to let no badness be in this soul, nor desire, nor any perturbation at all ; but looking at all things I see what is their nature, and I use each according to its value. Remember this power Avhich thou hast from nature. 30. Speak both in the senate and to every man, who- ever he may be, appropriately, not with any affecta- tion ; use plain discourse. 31. Augustus’ court, wife, daughter, descendants, ancestors, sister, Agrippa, kinsmen, intimates, friends, Areius,* Maecenas, physicians and sacrificing priests — the whole court is dead. Then turn to the rest, not * Areius was a pliilosoplier, wlio was intimate with Augustus ; Sucton, Augustus, c. 89 ; Plutarch, Antoninus, 80 ; Dion Cassius, 51, c. 16. 232 THE MEDITATIONS OF considering the death of a single man, [but of a whole race], as of the Pompeii ; and that which is inscribed on the tombs — the last of his race. Then consider Avhat trouble those before them have had that they might leave a successor ; and then, that of necessity some one must be the last. Again here consider the death of a Avhole race. 32. It is thy duty to order thy life Avell in every single act ; and if every act does its duty, as far as is possible, be content; and no one is able to hinder thee so that each act shall not do its duty — but something external Avill stand in the Avay. Nothing Avill stand in the Avay of thy acting justly and soberly and con- siderately, but perhaps some other active power will be hindered. Well, but by acquiescing in the hin- derance and by being content to transfer thy efforts to that Avhich is allowed, another opportunity of action is immediately put before thee in place of that Avhich Avas hindered, and one Avhich will adapt itself to this ordering of Avhich Ave are speaking. 33. Receive [AA^ealth or prosperity] Avithout arro. gance ; and be ready to let it go. 34. If thou didst ever see a hand cut off, or a foot, or a head, lying anywhere apart from the rest of the body, such does a man make himself, as far as he can, Avho is not content Avith what happens, and separates himself from others, or does anything unsocial. Sup- ])ose that thou hast detached thyself from the natural unity — for thou wast made by nature a part, but now thou hast cut thyself off — yet here there is this beauti- ful provision, that it is in thy poAver again to unite thyself. God has allowed this to no other part, after it has been separated and cut asunder, to come MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 233 together again. But consider the kindness by which he has distinguished man, for he has put it in his power not to be separated at all from the universal ; and when he has been separated, he has allowed him to return and to be united and to resume his place as a part. 35. As the natui’e of the universal has given to every rational being all the other powers that it has,f so we have received from it this power also. For as the universal nature converts and fixes in its predestined place everything which stands in the way and opposes it, and makes such things a part of itself, so also the rational animal is able to make every hinderance its OAvn material, and to use it for such purposes as it maj^ have designed. 36. Do not disturb thyself by thinking of the Avhole of thy life. Let not thy thoughts at once embrace all the various troubles which thou mayest expect to befall thee : but on every occasion ask thyself, What is there in this which is intolerable and past bearing? for thou Avilt be ashamed to confess. In the next place remember that neither the future nor the past pains thee, but only the present. But this is reduced to a very little, if thou only circumscribest it, and chidest thy mind, if it is unable to hold out against even this. 37. Does Panthea or Pergamus now sit by the tomb of Yerus?* Does Chaurias or Diotimus sit by the tomb of Hadrianus? That Avould be ridiculous. Well, sup- pose they did sit there, AA^ould the dead be conscious of it? and if the dead were conscious, would they be *“ Veras” is a conjecture of Saumaise, and perhaps the true reading. 234 THE MEDITATIONS OF pleased? and if they ^yere pleased, would that make them immortal? Was it not in the order of destiny that these persons too should first become old women and old men and then die? What then would those do after these were dead ? All this is foul smell and blood in a bag. 38. If thou canst see sharp, look and judge wisely,! says the philosopher. 39. In the constitution of the rational animal I see no virtue which is o]iposed to justice ; but I see a virtue which is opposed to love of pleasure, and that is temperance. 40. If thou takest away thy opinion about tliat which appears to give thee pain, thou thyself standest in perfect security. Who is this self ? The reason. But I am not reason. Be it so. Let then the reason itself not trouble itself. But if any other part of thee suffers, let it have its own opinion about itself (vii. 16). 41. Ilinderance to the perceptions of sense is an evil to the animal nature. Hinderance to the movements [desires] is equally an evil to the animal nature. And something else also is equally an impediment and an evil to the constitution of plants. So then that which is a hinderance to the intelligence is an evil to the intelligent nature. Apply all these things then to thyself. Does pain or sensuous pleasure affect thee ? The senses will look to that. Has any obstacle opposed thee in thy efforts toAvard an object? if indeed thou wast making this effort absolutely [unconditionally, or without any reservation], certainly this obstacle is an evil to thee considered as a rational animal. But if thou takest [into consideration] the usual course of things, thou hast not yet been injured nor even im- MARCUS A UBELIUS ANTONINUS. 235 peded. The things however which are proper to the understanding no other man is used to impede, for neither fire, nor iron, nor tyrant, nor abuse, touches it in any way. When it has been made a sphere, it continues a sphere (xi. 12). 4:2. It is not fit that I should give myself pain, for I have never intentionally given pain even to another. 48. Different things delight different people. But it is my delight to keep the ruling faculty sound with- out turning away either from any man or from any of the things which happen to men, but looking at and receiving all with welcome eyes and using every thing according to its value. 44. See that thou secure this present time to thyself ; for those who rather pursue posthumous fame do not consider that the men of after time will be exactly such as these whom they cannot bear now ; and both are mortal. And what is it in any way to thee if these men of after time utter this or that sound, or have this or that opinion about thee. 45. Take me and cast me where thou wilt ; for there I shall keep my divine part tranquil, that is, content, if it can feel and act conformably to its proper con- stitution. Is this [change of place] sufficient reason why my soul should be unhappy and worse than it was, depressed, expanded, shrinking, affrighted? and what wilt thou find which is sufficient reason for this.* 46. Nothing can happen to any man which is not a human accident, nor to an ox Avhich is not according to the nature of an ox, nor to a vine AA^hich is not * opeyoi-iEvrj in this passage seems to have a passive sense. It is difficult to find an apt expression for it and some of the other words. A comparison with xi. 12, will help to explain the meaning. 236 THE MEDITATIONS OF according to the nature of a vine, nor to a stone which is not proper to a stone. If then there happens to eacii thing both what is usual and natural, why shouldst thou complain? For the common nature brings nothing which may not be borne by thee. 47. If thou art pained by any external thing, it is not this thing that disturbs thee, but thy own judg- ment about it. And it is in thy power to wipe out this judgment now. But if anything in thy own dis- position gives thee pain, who hinders thee from cor- recting thy opinion? And even if thou art pained because thou art not doing some particular thing which seems to thee to be right, why dost thou not rather act than complain? But some insuperable obstacle is in the way ? Do not be grieved then, for the cause of its not being done depends not on thee. But it is not worth while to live, if this cannot be done. Take thy departure then from life contentedly, just as he dies who is in full activity, and well pleased too with the things which are obstacles. 48. Remember that the ruling faculty is invincible, wRen self-collected it is satisfied with itself, if it does nothing which it does not choose to do, even if it resist from mere obstinacy. What then will it be when it forms a judgment about anything aided by reason and deliberately ? Therefore the mind which is free from passions is a citadel, for man has nothing more secure to which he can fly for refuge and for the future be inexpugnable. He then who has not seen this is an ignorant man ; but he who has seen it and does not fly to this refuge is unhappy. 49. Say nothing more to thyself than what the first appearances report. Suppose that it has been reported MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 237 to thee that a certain person speaks ill of thee. This has been repoi’tecl ; but that thou hast been injured, that has not been reported. I see that my child is sick. I do see ; but that he is in danger, I do not see. Thus then always abide by the first appearances, and add nothing thyself from within, and then nothing happens to thee. Or rather add something, like a man who knows everything that happens in the world. 50. A cucumber is bitter. Throw it away. There are briars in the road. Turn aside from them. This is enough. Do not add. And why were such things made in the world? For thou wilt be ridiculed by a man who is acquainted with nature, as thou wouldst be ridiculed by a carpenter and shoemaker if thou didst find fault because thou seest in their workshop shavings and cuttings from the things which they make. And yet they have places into which they can throw these shavings and cuttings, and the universal nature has no external space ; but the wondrous part of her art is that though she has circumscribed herself, everything within her which appears to decay and to grow old and to be useless she changes into herself, and again makes other new things from these very same, so that she requires neither substance from with- out nor wants a place into which she may cast that Avhich decays. She is content then with her own space, and her own matter, and her own art. 51. Neither in thy actions be sluggish, nor in thy conversation without method, nor wandering in thy thoughts, nor let there be in thy soul inward conten- tion nor external effusion, nor in life be so busy as to have no leisure. Suppose that men kill thee, cut thee in pieces, curse 238 THE MEDITATIONS OF thee. What then can these things do to prevent thy mind from remaining pure, wise, sober, just? For instance, if a man should stand by a limpid pure spring, and curse it, the spring never ceases sending up potable Avater ; and if he should cast clay into it or filth, it Avill speedily disperse them and wash them out, and will not be at all polluted. How then shalt thou pos- sess a perpetual fountain [and not a mere well] ? By formingt thyself hourly to freedom conjoined with contentment, simplicity and modesty. 62. He who does not know what the world is, does not know where he is. And he Avho does not know for what purpose the Avorld exists, does not know who he is, nor Avhat the world is. But he who has failed in any one of these things could not even say for what purpose he exists himself. What then dost thou think of him Avho [avoids or] seeks the praise of those Avho applaud, of men who know not either where they are or who they are ? 53. Dost thou wish to be praised by a man Avho curses himself thrice every hour? Wouldst thou Avish to please a man Avho does not please himself? Does a man please himself Avho repents of nearly everything that he does ? 64. Ho longer let thy breathing only act in concert Avith the air which surrounds thee, but let thy intelli- gence also noAV be in harmony Avith the intelligence Avhich embraces all things. For the intelligent poAver is no less diffused in all parts and pervades all things for him who is Avilling to draAv it to him than the aerial poAver for him Avho is able to respire it. 55. Generally, Avickedness does no harm at all to the universe ; and particularly, the AAUckedness [of one MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 239 man] does no harm to another. It is only harmful to him who has it in his power to be released from it, as soon as he shall choose. 56. To my own free will the free will of my neigh- bor is just as indifferent as his poor breath and flesh. For though we are made especially for the sake of one another, still the ruling power of each of us has its own olBce, for otherwise my neighbor’s wickedness would be my harm, wdiich God has not willed in order that my unhappiness may not depend on another. 57. The sun appears to be poured down, and in all directions indeed it is diffused, yet it is not effused. For this diffusion is extension : Accordingly its rays are called Extensions [aKrz^es] because they are ex- tended [azro Tov eKTeive6Qai\.^ But one may judge what kind of a thing a ray is, if he looks at the sun’s light passing through a narrow opening into a darkened room, for it is extended in a right line, and, as it were, is divided when it meets with any solid body which stands in the way and intercepts the air beyond ; but there the light remains fixed and does not glide or fall off. Such then ought to be the outpouring and diffusion of the understanding, and it should in no way be an effusion, but an extension, and it should make no violent or impetuous collision with the obsta- cles which are in its way ; nor yet fall doAvn, but be fixed and enlightened that which receives it. For a body will deprive itself of the illumination, if it does not admit it. 58. He who fears death either fears the loss of sen- sation or a different kind of sensation. But if thou shalt have no sensation, neither wilt thou feel any * A piece of bad etymology. 240 THE MEDITATIONS OF harm ; and if thou shalt acquire another kind of sensa- tion, thou wilt be a different kind of living being, and thou wilt not cease to live. 59. Men exist for the sake of one another. Teach them then or bear with them. 60. In one way an arrow^ moves, in another way the mind. The mind, indeed, both when it exercises caution and when it is employed about inquiry, moves straight onward not the less, and to its object. 61. Enter into every man’s ruling faculty ; and also let every other man enter into thine.* Compare Epictetus, iii. 9, 13. MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 241 IX. He who acts unjustly acts impiously. For since the universal nature has made rational animals for the sake of one another to help one another according to their deserts, hut in no way to injure one another, he who transgresses her will, is clearly guilty of impiety toward the highest divinity. And he too who lies is guilty of impiety to the same divinity ; for the uni- versal nature is the nature of things that are ; and things that are have a relation to all things that come into existence.* And further, this universal nature is named truth, and is the prime cause of all things that are true. He then who lies intentionally is guilty of impiety inasmuch as he acts unjustly by deceiving ; and he also who lies unintentionally, inasmuch as he is at variance with the universal nature, and inasmuch as he disturbs the order by fighting against the nature of the world ; for he fights against it, who is moved of himself to that which is contrary to truth, for he had *“As there is not any action or natural event, which we are acquainted with, so single and unconnected as not to have a respect to some other actions and events, so, possibly each of them, when it has not an immediate, may yet have a remote, natural relation to other actions and events, much beyond the compass of this present world.” Again: “Things seemingly the most insignificant imagin- able, are perpetually observed to be necessary conditions to other things of the greatest importance; so that any one thing whatever, may, for aught we know to the contrary, be a necessary condition to any other.” (Butler’s Analogy, Chap. 7. See all the chapter.) U2 THE MEDITATIONS OP I’eceived powers from nature through the neglect of which he is not able now to distinguish falsehood from truth. And, indeed, he who pursues pleasure as good, and avoids pain as evil, is guilty of impiety. For of necessity such a man must often find fault with the universal nature, alleging that it assigns things to the bad and tlie good contrary to their deserts, because frequently the bad are in the enjoyment of pleasure and possess the things which procure pleasure, but the good have pain for their share and the things which cause pain. And further, he wdio is afraid of pain will sometimes also be afraid of some of the things which will happen in the world, and even this is inipiet}'^. And he who pursues pleasure wdll not abstain from injustice, and this is plainly impiety. Now, with respect to the things toward which the universal nature is equally affected — for it would not have made both, unless it was equally affected toward both- — toward these they who wish to follow nature should be of the same mind with it, and equally affected. With respect to pain, then, and pleasure, or death and life, or honor and dishonor, which the universal nature employs equally, whoever is not equally affected is manifestly acting impiously. And I say that the uni- versal nature employs them equally, instead of saying that they happen alike to those who are produced in continuous series and to those who come after them by virtue of a certain original movement of Provi- dence, according to which it moved from a certain beginning to this ordering of things, having conceived certain principles of the things which were to be, and having determined powers productive of beings and of changes and of such like successions (vii. 75). MARCUS A UBELIUS ANTONINUS. 241 2. It would be a man’s- happiest lot to depart from mankind without having had any taste of lying and hypocrisy and luxury and pride. However to breathe out one’s life when a man has had enough of these things is the next best voyage, as the saying is. Hast thou determined to abide with vice, and has not experience yet induced thee to lly from this pestilence ? For the destruction of the understanding is a pesti- lence, much more, indeed, than any such corruption and change of this atmosphere which suiTounds us. For this corruption is a pestilence of animals so far as they are animals ; but the other is a pestilence of men so far as they are men. 3. Do not despise death, but be well content with it, since this too is one of those things which nature wills. For such as it is to be young and to grow old, and to increase and to reach maturity, and to have teeth and beard and gray hairs, and to beget, and to be pregnant, and to bring forth, and all the other natural operations which the seasons of thy life bring, such also is dissolution. This, then, is consistent with the character of a reflecting man, to be neither care- less nor impatient nor contemptuous with respect to death, but to wait for it as one of the operations of nature. As thou now waitest for the time when the child shall come out of th}'- wife’s womb, so be ready for the time when thy soul shall fall out of this envelope.* But if thou requires! also a vulgar kind of comfort which shall reach thy heart, thou wilt be made best reconciled to death by observing the objects from which thou art going to be removed, and the morals of those with whom thy soul will no longer be *See note of the Philosophy, p. 67. 244 the MEHITATI0N8 OF mingled. For it is no right to be offended with men, but it is thy duty to care for them and to bear with them gently ; and yet to remember that thy departure will be not from men who have the same ])i’inciples as thyself. For this is the only thing, if there be any, which could draw us the contrary way and attach us to life, to be permitted to live with those who have the same principles as ourselves. But now thou seest how great is the trouble arising from the discordance of those who live together, so that thou mayest say. Come quick, O death, lest perchance I, too, should forget mj^self. 4. He who does wrong does wrong against himself. He who acts unjustly acts unjustly to himself, because he makes himself bad. 5. He often acts unjustly who does not do a certain thing ; not only he who does a certain thing. 6. Thy present opinion founded on understanding, and thy present conduct directed to social good, and thy present disposition of contentment with every thing whicli happensf — that is enough. 7. Wipe out imagination : check desire: extinguish appetite : keep the ruling faculty in its own power. 8. Among the animals which have not reason one life is distributed ; but among reasonable animals one intelligent soul is distributed : just as there is one earth of all things Avhich are of an earthly nature, and we see by one light, and breathe one air, all of us that have the facult}'^ of vision and all that have life. 9. All things which participate in anything which is common to them all move toward that which is of the same kind with themselves. Everything which is earthly turns toward the earth, everything which is MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 245 liquid flows together, and everything which is of an aerial kind does the same, so that they require some- thing to keep them asunder, and the application of force. Fire indeed moves upward on account of the elemental fire, but it is so ready to be kindled together with all the fire which is here, that even every sub- stance which is somewhat drv, is easily ignited, because there is less mingled with it of that which is a hinder- ance to ignition. Accordinghq then everything also which participates in the common intelligent nature moves in like manner toward that which is of the same kind with itself, or moves even more. For so much as it is superior in comparison with all other things, in the same degree also is it more ready to mingle with and to be fused with that which is akin to it. Accordingly among animals devoid of reason we find swarms of bees, and herds of cattle, and the nurture of young birds, and in a manner, loves ; for even in animals there are souls, and that power which brings them together is seen to exert itself in the superior degree, and in such a way as never has been observeddn plants nor in stones nor in trees. But in rational animals there are political communities and friendships, and families and meetings of people ; and in wars, treaties and armistices. But in the things which are still superior, even though they are sepa- rated from one another, unit}'^ in a manner exists, as in the stars. Thus the ascent to the higher degree is able to produce a sympathy even in things which are sepa- rated. See, then, what now takes place. For only intelligent animals have now forgotten this mutual desire and inclination, and in them alone the property of flowing together is not seen. But still, though men 246 THE MEmTATToNS OP strive to avoid [this union], they are caught and held by it, for their nature is too strong for them ; and thou wilt see what I say, if thou only observest. Sooner, then, will one find anything earthy which comes in contact with no earthy thing than a man altogether separated from other men. 10. Both man and God and the universe produce fruit ; at the proper seasons each produces it. But if usage has especially fixed these terms to the vine and like things, this is notliing. Beason produces fruit both for all and for itself, and there are produced from it other things of the same kind as reason itself. 11. If thou art able, correct by teaching those who do wrong; but if thou canst not, remember that indul- gence is given to thee for this purpose. And the gods, too, are indulgent to such persons ; and for some pur- poses they even help them to get health, wealth, reputation ; so kind they are. And it is in thy poAver also ; or say, Avho hinders thee ? 12. Labor not as one who is wretched, nor yet as one who would be pitied or admired ; but direct thy Avill to one thing only, to put thyself in motion and to check thyself, as the social reason requires. 13. To-day I have got out of all trouble, or rather I have cast out all trouble, for it was not outside, but within and in my opinions. 14. All things are the same, familiar in experience, and ephemeral in time, and worthless in the matter. Everything now is just as it was in the time of those whom Ave have buried. 15. Things stand outside of us, themselves by them- selves, neither knoAving aught of themselves, nor ex- pressing any judgment. What is it, then, Avhich does judge about them? The ruling faculty. MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 24? 16. N’ot in passivity, but in activity lie the evil and the good of the rational social animal, just as his virtue and his vice lie not in passivity, but in activity.* 17. For the stone which has been thrown up it is no evil to come down, nor indeed any good to have been carried up (viii. 20). 18. Penetrate inward into men’s leading principles, and thou wilt see what judges thou art afraid of, and what kind of judges they are of themselves. 19. All things are changing ; and thou thyself art in continuous mutation and in a manner in continuous destruction, and the whole universe too. 20. It is thy duty to leave another man’s wrongful act there where it is (vii. 29, ix. 38). 21. Termination of activity, cessation from move- ment and opinion, and in a sense their death, is no evil. Turn thy thoughts now to the consideration of thy life, thy life as a child, as a youth, thy manhood, thy old age, for in these also every change was a death. Is this anything to fear? Turn thy thoughts now to thy life under thy grandfather, then to thy life under thy mother, then to thy life under thy father ; and as thou findest many other differences and changes and terminations, ask thyself. Is this anything to fear ? In like manner, then, neither are the termination and cessation and change of thy whole life a thing to be afraid of. 22. Hasten [to examine] thy own ruling faculty and that of the universe and that of thy neighbor ; thy own that thou mayest make it just ; and that of the universe, that thou mayest remember of what thou art *“Virtiitis omnis laus in actione consistH.” (Cicero, De Off, i 6.) 248 THE MEDITATIONS OF a part ; and that of thy neighbor, that thou mayest know whether he has acted ignorantly or with knowl- edge, and that thou mayest also consider that his ruling faculty is akin to thine. 23. As thou thyself art a component part of a social system, so let every act of thine be a component part of social life. Whatever act of thine then has no reference, either immediately or remotely, to a social end, this tears asunder thy life, and does not allow it to be one, and it is of the nature of a mutiny, just as when in a popular assembly a man acting by himself stands apart from the general agreement. 24. Quarrels of little children and their sports, and poor spirits carrying about dead bodies [such is every- thing] ; and so what is exhibited in the representation of the mansions of the dead strikes our eyes more clearly. 25. Examine into the quality of the form of an object, and detach it altogether from its material part, and then contemplate it ; then determine the time, the longest which a thing of this peculiar form is naturally made to endure. 26. Thou hast endured infinite troubles through not being contented with thy ruling faculty, when it does the things which it is constituted by nature to do. But enoughf [of this]. 27. When another blames thee or hates thee, or when men say about thee anything injurious, approach their poor souls, penetrate within, and see what kind of men they are. Thou wilt discover that there is no reason to take any trouble that these men may have this or that opinion about thee. However, thou must be well-disposed toward them, for by nature they are MARCUS A URELIUS ANl'ONmUS. 249 friends. And the gods too aid them in all ways, by dreams, by signs, toward the attainment of those things on which they set a value. f 28. The periodic movements of the universe are the same, up and down from age to age. And either the universal intelligence puts itself in motion for every separate etfect, and if this is so, be thou content with that which is the result of its activity ; or it puts itself in motion once, and everything else comes by way of sequence in a manner ; or indivisible elements are the origin of all things. In a word, if there is a god, all is well ; and if chance rules, do not thou also be governed by it (vi. 44, vii. 75). Soon will the earth cover us aU : then the earth, too, will change, and the things also which result from change will continue to change forever, and these again forever. For if a man reflects on the changes and transformations which follow one another like wave after wave and their rapidity, he will despise everything which is perishable (xii. 21). 29. The universal cause is like a winter torrent ; it carries everything along with it. But how worthless are all these poor people who are engaged in matters political, and, as they suppose, are playing the philoso- pher! All drivelers. Well then, man: do what nature now requires. Set thyself in motion, if it is in thy power, and do not look about thee to see if any one will observe it ; nor \"et expect Plato’s Kepublic ; * but be content if the smallest thing goes on well, and consider such an event to be no small matter. For who can change men’s opinions ? And without a change of * Those who wish to know what Plato’s Republic is, may now study it in the accurate translation of Davies and Vaughan. 250 THE MEDITATIONS OF opinions what else is there than the slavery of men who groan while they pretend to obey ? Come now and tell me of Alexander and Philippus and Demetrius of Phalerum. They themselves shall judge whether they discovered what the common nature required, and trained themselves accordingly. But if they acted like tragedy heroes, no one has condemned me to imitate them. Simple and modest is the work of philosophy. Draw me not aside to insolence and pride. 30. Look down from above on the countless herds of men and their countless solemnities, and the infinitely varied voyagings in storms and calms, and the differ- ences among those who are born, who live together, and die. And consider, too, the life lived by others in olden time, and the life of those who will live after thee, and the life now lived among barbarous nations, and hoAV many know not even thy name, and how many will soon forget it, and how the}^ who, perhaps, now are praising thee will very soon blame thee, and that neither a posthumous name is of any value, nor reputation, nor anything else. 31. Let there be freedom from perturbations with respect to the things which come from the external cause ; and let there be justice in the things done by virtue of the internal cause, that is, let there be move- ment and action terminating in this, in social acts, for this is according to thy nature. 32. Thou canst remove out of the way many useless things among those which disturb thee, for they lie entirely in thy opinion ; and thou wilt then gain for thyself ample space by comprehending the whole uni- verse in thy mind, and by contemplating the eternity of time, and observing the rapid change of every sev- MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 251 eral thing, how short is the time from birth to dissolu- tion, and the illimitable time before birth as well as the equally boundless time after dissolution. 33. All that thou seest Avill quickly perish, and those who have been spectatois of its dissolution will veiy soon perish too. And he who dies at the extremest old age will be brought into the same condition with him who died prematurely. 34. What are these men’s leading principles, and about what kind of things are they busy, and for what kind of reasons do they love and honor ? Imagine that thou seest their poor souls laid bare. When they think that they do harm by their blame or good by their praise, what an idea ! 35. Loss is nothing else than change. But the uni- versal nature delights in change, and in obedience to her all things are now done well, and from eternity have been done in like form, and will be such to time without end. What, then, dost thou say? That all things have been and all things always will be bad, and that no power has ever been found in so many gods to rectify these things, but the Avorld has been condemned to be bound in never-ceasing evil ? (iv. 45, vii. 18.) 36. The rottenness of the matter which is the foun- dation of everything! water, dust, bones, filth; or again, marble rocks, the callosities of the earth ; and gold and silver, the sediments ; and garments, only bits of hair; and purple dye, blood; and everything else is of the same kind. And that which is of the nature of breath, is also another thing of the same kind, changing from this to that. 37. Enough of this wretched life and murmuring 252 THE MEDITATIONS OF and apish tricks. Why art thou disturbed ? What is there new in this? What unsettles thee? Is it the form of the thing? Look at it. Or is it the matter? Look at it. But besides these there is nothinsr. Toward the gods, then, now become at last more sim- ple and better. It is the same whether we examine these things for a hundred years or three. 38. If any man has done wrong, the harm is his own. But perhaps he has not done wrong. 39. Either all things proceed from one intelligent source and come together as in one body, and the part ought not to find fault with what is done for the benefit of the whole; or there are only atoms, and nothing else than mixture and dispersion. Why, then, art thou disturbed ? Say to the ruling faculty, Art thou dead, art thou corrupted, art thou playing the hypocrite, art thou become a beast, dost thou herd and feed with the rest ?^' 40. Either the gods have no power or they have power. If, then, they have no power, why dost thou pray to them ? But if they have power, why dost thou not pray for them to give thee the faculty of not fearing any of the things which thou fearest, or of not desiring any of the things which thou desirest, or not being pained at anything, rather than pray that any of these things sliould not happen or happen? for cer- tainly if they can co-operate with men, they can co- operate for these purposes. But perhaps thou wilt say, the gods have placed them in thy power. Well, * There is some corruption at the end of this section ; but I think that the translation expresses the emperor’s meaning. Whether intelli- gence rules all things or chance rules, a man must not he disturbed. He must use the power that he has, and be tranquil. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 253 then, is it not better to use what is in thy power like a free man than to desire in a slavish and abject way what is not in thy power ? And who has told thee that the gods do not aid us even in the things which are in our power? Begin, then, to pra}'^ for such things, and thou wilt see. One man prays thus : How shall I be able to lie with that woman ? Do thou pray thus : How shall I not desire to lie with her ? Another prays thus : How shall I be released from this ? Another prays : How shall I not desme to be released ? Another thus: How shall I not lose my little son? Thou thus : Hoav shall I not be afraid to lose him ? In fine, turn thy prayers this way, and see what comes. 41. Epicurus sa}'s. In m}^ sickness my conversation Avas not about my bodily sufferings, nor, saj^s he, did I talk on such subjects to those Avho visited me ; but I continued to discourse on the nature of things as before, keeping to this main point, how the mind, Avhile participating in such movements as go on in the poor flesh, shall be free from perturbations and main- tain its proper good. Hor did I, he says, give the physicians an opportunity of putting on solemn looks, as if they were doing something great, but my life Avent on Avell and happily. Do, then, the same that he did both in sickness, if thou art sick, and in any other circumstances ; for never to desert philosophy in any events that may befall us, nor to hold trifling talk either Avith an ignorant man or with one unacquainted Avith nature, is a principle of all schools of philosophy ; but to be intent only on that Avhich thou art noAV doing and on the instrument by Avhich thou doest it. 42. When thou art offended Avith any man’s shame- less conduct, immediately ask thyself, Is it possible, 254 THE MEDITATIONS OF then, that shameless men should not be in the world ? It is not possible. Do not, then, require what is impos- sible. For this man also is one of those shameless men who must of necessity be in the world. Let the same considerations be present to thy mind in the case of the knave, and the faithless man, and of every man who does wrong in any way. For, at the same time, that thou dost remind thyself that it is impossible that such kind of men should not exist, thou wilt become more kindly disposed toward every one individually. It is useful to perceive tliis, too, immediately when the occasion arises, what virtue nature has given to man to oppose to every wrongful act. For she has given to man, as an antidote against the stupid man, mildness, and against another kind of man some other power. And in all cases it is possible for thee to correct by teaching the man who is gone astray ; for every man who errs misses his object and is gone astray. Besides wherein hast thou been injured? For thou wilt find that no one among those against whom thou art irritated has done anything by which thy mind could be made worse ; but that which is evil to thee and harmful has its foundation only in the mind. And what harm is done or Avhat is there strange, if the man who has not been instructed does the acts of an unin- structed man? Consider whether thou.shouldst not rather blame thyself, because thou didst not expect such a man to err in such a Avay. For thou hadst means given thee by thy reason to supjiose that it Avas likely that he Avould commit this error, and yet thou hast forgotten and art amazed that he has erred. But most of all Avhen thou blamest a man as faithless or ungrateful, turn to thyself. For the fault is manifestly MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 255 thy own, whether thou didst trust that a man who had such a disposition would keep his promise, or when conferring thy kindness thou didst not confer it abso- lutely, nor yet in such way as to have received from thy very act all the profit. For what more dost thou want when thou hast done a man a service? Art thou not content that thou hast done something conforma- ble to thy nature, and dost thou seek to be paid for it ? Just as if the eye demanded a recompense for seeing, or the feet for walking. For as these members are formed for a particular purpose, and by working according to their several constitutions obtain what is their own ; so also as man is formed by nature to acts of benevolence, when he has done anything benevolent or in any other way conducive to the common interest, he has acted conformably to his constitution, and he gets what is his own. 256 THE MEDITATIONS OF X. Wilt thou, then, my soul, never be good and simple and one and naked, more manifest than the body which surrounds thee? Wilt thou never enjoy an affectionate and contented disposition? Wilt thou never be full and without a want of any kind, longing for nothing more, nor desiring anything, either ani- mate or inanimate, for the enjoyment of pleasures? nor yet desii’ing time wherein thou shalt have longer enjoyment, or place, or ]ileasant climate, or societ}'^ of men with wliom thou mayest live in harmony ? but wilt thou be satisfied with thy present condition, and pleased with all that is about thee, and wilt thou con- vince thyself that thou hast everything and that it comes from the gods, that everything is well for thee, and will be well whatever shall please them, and what- ever they shall give for the conservation of the perfect living being,* the good and just and beautiful, which generates and holds together all things, and contains and embraces all things which are dissolved for the production of other like things? Wilt thou never be such that thou shalt so dwell in community with gods and men a,s neither to find fault with them at all, nor to be condemned by them ? 2. Oliserve what thy nature requires, so far as thou * That is, (lod (iv. 40), as he is defined by Zeno. But the con- fusion between gods and God is strange. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 257 art governed by nature only ; then do it and accept it, if thy nature, so far as thou art a living being, shall not be made worse by it. And next thou must observe what thy nature requires so far as thou art a living being. And all this thou mayest allow thyself^ if thy nature, so far as thou art a rational animal, shall not be made worse by it. But the rational animal is conse- quently also a political [social] animal. Use these rules, then, and trouble thyself about nothing else. 3. Everything which happens either happens in such wise as thou art formed by nature to bear it, or as thou art not formed by nature to bear it. If, then, it happens to thee in such way as thou art formed by nature to bear it, do not complain, but bear it as thou art formed by nature to bear it. But if it happens in such wise as thou art not formed by nature to bear it, do not complain, for it will perish after it has con- sumed thee. Eemember, however, that thou art formed by nature to bear everything, with respect to which it depends on thy own opinion to make it endur- able and tolerable, by thinking that it is either thy interest or thy duty to do this. 4. If a man is mistaken, instruct him kindly and show him his error. But if thou art not able, blame thyself, or blame not even thyself. 5. Whatever may happen to thee, it was prepared for thee from all eternity; and the implication of causes was from eternity spinning the thread of thy being, and of that which is incident to it (iii. 11 ; iv. 26). 6. Whether the universe is [a concourse of] atoms, or nature [is a system], let this first be established, that I am a part of the Avhole which is goA^erned by nature ; next, I am in a manner intimately related to 358 THE MEDITATIONS OF the parts which are of the same kind with myself. For remembering this, inasmuch as I am a part, I shall be discontented with none of the things which are assigned to me out of the whole ; for nothing is in- jurious to the part, if it is for the advantage of the whole. For the whole contains nothing Avhich is not for its advantage ; and all natures indeed have this common principle, but the nature of the universe has this principle besides, that it cannot be compelled even by any external cause to generate anything harmful to itself. By remembering, then, that I am a part of such a whole, I shall be content with everything that happens. And inasmuch as I am in a manner inti- mately related to the parts which are of the same kind with myself, I shall do nothing unsocial, but I shall rather direct myself to the things which are of the same kind with myself, and I shall turn all my efforts to the common interest, and divert them from the contrary. ISTow, if these things are done so, life must flow on happily, just as thou mayest observe that the life of a citizen is happy, who continues a course of action which is advantageous to his fellow-citizens, and is content with whatever the state may assign to him. 7. The parts of the whole, everything, I mean, which is naturally comprehended in the universe, must of neeessity perish ; but let this be understood in this sense, that they must undergo change. But if this is naturally both an evil and a necessity for the parts, the whole would not continue to exist in a good con- dition, the parts being subject to change and consti- tuted so as to perish in various ways. For whether did nature herself design to do evil to the things which are parts of herself, and to make them subject to evil MARCUS A URBLIUS AMTOmNUS. 259 and of necessity fall into evil, or have such results happened without her knowing it ? Both these sup- positions, indeed, are incredible. But if a man should even drop the term Nature [as an efficient power], and should speak of these things as natural, even then it would be ridiculous to affirm at the same time that the parts of the whole are in their nature subject to change, and at the same time to be surprised or vexed as if something were happening contrary to nature, particularly as the dissolution of things is into those things of which each thing is composed. For there is either a dispersion of the elements out of which every thing has been compounded, or a change from the solid to the earthly and from the airy to the aerial, so that these parts are taken back into the universal reason, whether this at certain periods is consumed by fire or renewed by eternal changes. And do not imagine that the solid and the airy part belong to thee from the time of generation. For all this received its accretion only yesterday and the day before, as one may say, from the food and the air which is inspired. This, then, which has received [the accretion], changes, not that which thy mother brought forth. But sup- pose that this [which thy mother brought forth] im- plicates thee very much with that other part, which has the peculiar quality [of change], this is nothing in fact in the way of objection to what is said.* * The end of this section is perhaps corrupt. The meaning is very obscure. I have given that meaning which appears to be con- sistent with the whole argument. The emperor here maintains that the essential part of man is unchangeable, and that the other parts, if they change or perish, do not affect that which really constitutes the man. See the Philosophy of Antoninus, p. 50, note. 260 ^ THE MEDITATIONS OF 8. "When thou hast assumed these names, good, mod- est, true, rational, a man of equanimity, and magnani- mous, take care thou dost not change these names ; and if thou shouldst lose them, quickly return to them. And remember that the term Rational was in- tended to signify a discriminating attention to every several thing and freedom from negligence ; and that Equanimity is the voluntary acceptance of the things which are assigned to thee by the common nature ; and that Magnanimity is the elevation of the intelli- gent part above the pleasurable or painful sensations of the flesh, and above that poor thing called fame, and death, and all such things. If, then, thou main- tamest thyself in the possession of these names, with- out desiring to be called by these names by others, thou wilt be another person and wilt enter on another life. Eor to continue to be such as thou hast hitherto been, and to be torn in pieces and defiled in such a life, is the character of a very stupid man and one overfond of his life, and like those half-devoured fight- ers with wild beasts, who, though covered with wounds and gore, still intreat to be kept to the following day, though they will be exposed in the same state to the same claAvs and bites.* Therefore fix thyself in the possession of these few names : and if thou art able to abide in them, abide as if thou wast removed to certain islands of the Ilaiipy.:}; But if thou shalt * See Seneca, Epp. 70, on these exhibitions which amused the people of those days. These figliters were the Bestlarii, some of whom may have been criminals, but even if they were, the exhibi- tion was equally characteristic of the depraved hahits of the spectators. I The islands of the Happy, or the Fortunatse Insul®, are spoken of by the Greek and Roman writers. They were the abode of Heroes, like Achilles and Diomedes, as we see in the Scolion of Har- MARCUS A URELWS ANTONINUS. 361 perceive that thou tallest out of them and dost not maintain thy hold, go courageously into some nook where thou shalt maintain them, or even depart at once from life, not in passion, but with simplicity and freedom and modesty, after doing this one [laudable] thing at least in thy life, to have gone out of it thus. In order, however, to the remembrance of these names, it will greatly help thee, if thou rememberest the gods, and that they wish not to be flattered, but wish all reasonable beings to be made like themselves ; and if thou rememberest that what does the work of a fig-tree is a fig-tree, and that what does the work of a dog' is a dog, and that what does the work of a bee is a bee, and that what does the work of a man is a man. 9. Mimi,* war, astonishment, torpor, slavery, will daily wipe out those holy principles of thine, f How many things without studying nature dost thou imagine, and how many dost thou neglect ? But it is thy duty so to modius and Aristogiton. Sertorius heard of the islands at Cadiz from some sailors who had been there, and he had a wish to go and live in them and rest from his troubles. (Plutarch, Sertorius, c. 8.) In the Odyssey, Proteus told Menelaus that he should not die in Argos, but be removed to a place at the boundary of the earth where Rhada- manthus dwelt : (Odyssey, iv. 565.) For there in sooth man’s life is easiest: Nor snow nor raging storm nor rain is there. But ever gently breathing gales of Zephyr Oceanus sends up to gladden man. It is certain that the writer of the Odyssey only follows some old legend without having any knowledge of any place which corresponds to his description. The two islands which Sertorius heard of may be Madeira and the adjacent island. (Compare Pindar, 01. ii. 129.) Corals conjectured yUldoS “ hatred ” in place of Mimi, Roman plays in which action and gesticulation were all or nearly all. 2G2 THE MEDITATIONS Off look on and so to do everything, that at the same time the power of dealing with circumstances is perfected, and the contemplative faculty is exercised, and the confidence which comes from the knowledge of each several thing is maintained without showing it, but yet not concealed. For when wilt tliou enjoy simplic- ity, when gravity, and when the knowledge of every several thing, both what it is in substance, and what place it has in the universe, and how long it is formed to exist, and of what things it is compounded, and to whom it can belong, and who are able both to give it and take it away ? 10. A spider is proud when it has caught a fly, and another when he has caught a poor hare, and another when he has taken a little fish in a net, and another when he has taken wild boars, and another when he has taken bears, and another when he has taken Sar- matians. Are not these robbers, if thou examinest their opinions ? * 11. Acquire the contemplative way of seeing how all things change into one another, and constantly attend to it, and exercise thyself about this part [of philosophy]. For nothing is so much adapted to pro- duce magnanimity. Such a man has put off the body, and, as he sees that he must, no one knows how soon, go away from among men and leave everything here, he gives himself up entirely to just doing in all his actions, and in everything. else that happens he resigns himself to the universal nature. But as to what any man shall say or think about him, or do against him, he * Marcus means to say that conquerors are robbers. He himself warred against Sarmatians, and was a robber, as he says, like the rest. But compare the life of Avidius Cassius, c. 4, by Vulcatius. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 263 never even thinks of it, being himself contented with these two things, with acting justly in what he now does, and being satisfied with what is noAV assigned to him ; and he lays aside all distracting and busy pur- suits, and desires nothing else than to accomplish the straight course through the law,* and by accomplish- insT the straight course to folloAV God. 12. What need is there of suspicious fear, since it is in thy power to inquire what ought to be done? And if thou seest clear, go by this Avay content, without turning back : but if thou dost not see clear, stop and take the best advisers. But if any other things oppose thee, go on according to thy powers with due consid- eration, keeping to that Avhich appears to be just. For it is best to reach this object, and if thou dost fail, let thy failure be in attempting this. He who follows reason in all things is both tranquil and active at the same time, and also cheerful and collected. 13. Inquire of thyself as soon as thou Avakest from sleep Avhether it Avill make any difference to thee, if another does what is just and right. It will make no difference (au. 32 ; viii. 55). Thou has not forgotten, I suppose, that those who assume arrogant airs in bestowing their praise or blame on others, are such as they are at bed and at board, and thou hast not forgotten Avhat they do, and Avhat they avoid and Avhat they pursue, and hoAv they steal and hoAV they rob, not Avith hands and feet, but with their most A^aluable part, by means of Avhich there is produced, when a man chooses, fidelity, modesty, truth, law, a good demon [happiness]? (vii. 17.) * By the law, he means the divine law, obedience to the will of God. 264 THE MEDITATIONS OF 14. To her who gives and takes back all, to nature, the man who is instructed and modest says. Give what thou wilt ; take back what thou wilt. And he says this not proudly, but obediently and well pleased with her. 15. Short is the little which remains to thee of life. Live as on a mountain. For it makes no difference whether a man lives there or here, if he lives every- where in the world as in a state [political community]. Let men see, let them know a real man who lives according to nature. If they cannot endure him, let them kill him. For that is better than to live thus [as men do]. 16. No longer talk at all about the kind of man that a good man ought to be, but be such. 17. Constantly contemplate the whole of time and the whole of substance, and consider that all individual things as to substance are a grain of a fig, and as to time, the turning of a gimlet. 18. Look at everything that exists, and observe that it is already in dissolution and in change, and as it were putrefaction or dispersion, or that everything is so constituted by nature as to die. 19. Consider what men are when they are eating, sleeping, generating, easing themselves and so forth. Then what kind of men they are when they are im- periousf and arrogant, or angry and scolding from their elevated place. But a short time ago to how many they were slaves and for what things: and after a little time consider in what a condition they will be. 20. That is for the good of each thing, which the universal nature brings to each. And it is for its good at the time when nature brings it. MABCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 265 21. “ The earth loves the shower and “ the solemn ether loves and the universe loves to make what- ever is about to be. I say then to the universe, that I love as thou lovest. And is not this too said, that “ this or that loves [is wont] to be produced.”* 22. Either thou livest here and hast already accus- tomed th^^self to it, or thou aid going awa}^, and this was thy own will: or thou art dying and hast dis- charged thy duty. But besides these things there is nothing. Be of good cheer, then. 23. Let this alwa}^s be plain to thee, that this piece of land is like any other ; and that all things here are the same with things on the top of a mountain, or on the sea-shore, or wherever thou choosest to be. For thou wilt find just what Plato says. Dwelling within the walls of a city as in a shepherd’s fold on a mount- ain. [The three last words are omitted in the trans- lation.]]; 2-1. What is my ruling faculty now to me? and of what nature am I now making it ? and for what pur- pose am I now using it ? is it void of understanding ? is it loosed and rent asunder from social life? is it melted into and mixed with the poor flesh so as to move together with it ? * These words are from Euripides. They are cited by Aristotle, Ethic. Nicom. viii. 1. It was the fashion of the Stoics to work on the meanings of words. So Antoninus here takes the verb qnXei, “loves,” which has also the sense of “is wont,” “uses,” and the like. He finds in the common language of mankind a philosophical truth, and most great truths are expressed in the common language of life; some understand them, but most people utter them, without knowing how much they mean. X Plato, Thesei. 174 D. E. But compare the original with the use that Antoninus has made of it. 266 THE MEDITATIONS OF 25. He who flies from his master is a runaway ; but the law is master, and he who breaks the law is a run- away. And he also who is grieved or angry or afraid,f is dissatisfied because something has been or is or shall be of the things which are appointed by him who rules , all things, and he is Law, and assigns to every man what is fit. He then who fears or is grieved or is angry is a runaway.* 26. A man deposits seed in a womb and goes away, and then another cause takes it, and labors on it and makes a child. What a thing from such a material ! Again, the child passes food down through the throat, and then another cause takes it and makes perception and motion, and in fine life and strength and other things; how many and how strange! Observe then the things which are produced in such a hidden way, and see the power just as we see the power which carries things downward and u])ward, not with the eyes, but still no less plainly (vii. 75). 27. Constantly consider how all things such as they now are, in time past also were ; and consider that they will be the same again. And place before thy eyes entire dramas and stages of the same form, whatever thou hast learned from thy experience or from older history ; for example, the whole court of Hadrianus, und the whole court of Antoninus, and the whole court of Philippus, Alexander, Croesus ; for all those were such dramas as we see now, only with different actors. 28. Imagine every man who is grieved at anything or discontented to be like a j^ig which is sacrificed and kicks and screams. * Antoninus is here playing on the etymology of vofioi, law, as signment, that which assigns (yef^Ei) to every man his portion. MABCUS A URELIU8 ANTONINUS. 267 Like this pig also is he who on his bed in silence laments the bonds in’ which we are held. And con- sider that only to the rational animal is it given to follow voluntarily what happens ; but simply to follow is a necessity imposed on all. 29. Severally on the occasion of everything that thou doest, pause and ask thyself, if death is a dread- ful thing because it deprives thee of this. 30. When thou art offended at any man’s fault, forthwith turn to thyself and reflect in what like man- ner thou dost err thyself ; for example, in thinking that money is a good thing, or pleasure, or a bit of reputation, and the like. For by attending to this thou wilt quickly forget thy anger, if this considera- tion also is added, that the man is compelled ; for what else could he do ? or, if thou art able, take away from him the compulsion. 31. When thou hast seen Satyron* the Socratic,! think of either, Eutyches or Hymen, and when thou hast seen Euphrates, think of Eutychion or Silvanus, and when thou hast seen Alciphron think of Tropmo- phorus, and when thou hast seen Xenophon think of Crito:]; or Severus, and when thou hast looked on thy- self, think of any other Ceesar, and in the case of every one do in like manner. Then let this thought be in thy mind, Where then are those men? Xowhere, or * Nothing is known of Satyron or Satyrion; nor, I believe, of Eutyches or Hymen. Euphrates is honorably mentioned by Epictetus (iii. 15, 8; iv. 8, 17). Pliny (Epp. i. 10), speaks very highly of him. He obtained the permission of the Emperor Hadrian to drink poison, because he was old and in bad health (Dion Cassius. 69, c. 8). t Crito is the friend of Socrates; and he was, it appears, also a friend of Xenophon. When the emperor says “seen,” he does not mean with the eyes, 268 THE MEDITATIONS OF nobody knows where. For thus continuously thou wilt look at human things as smoke and nothing at all ; especially if thou reflectest at the same time that what has once changed will never exist again in the infinite duration of time. But thou, in what a brief space of time is thy existence? And why art thou not content to pass through this short time in an orderly way ? What matter and opportunity [for thy activity] art thou avoiding? For what else are all these things, except exercises for the reason, when it has viewed carefully and by examination into their nature the things which happen in life? Persevere then until thou shalt have made these things thy own, as the stomach which is strengthened makes all things its own, as the blazing fire makes flame and brightness out of everything that is thrown into it. 32. Let it not be in any man’s poAver to say truly of thee that thou art not simple, or that thou art not good; but let him be a liar whoever shall think any- thing of this kind about thee ; and this is altogether in thy power. For who is he that shall hinder thee from being good and simple? Do thou only determine to live no longer, unless thou shalt be such. For neither does reason allow [thee to live], if thou art not such.* 33. What is that which as to this material [our life] can be done or said in the way most conformable to reason. For whatever this may be, it is in thy poAver to do it or to say it, and do not make excuses that thou art hindered. Thou Avilt not cease to lament till thy mind is in such a condition that, Avhat luxury is to those Avho enjoy pleasure, such shall be to thee, in the * Compare Epictetus, i. 39, 28. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 2G9 matter which is subjected and presented to thee, the . doin^ of the things which are conformable to man’s constitution ; for a man ought to consider as an enjoy- ment everything which it is in his power to do accord- ing to his own nature. And it is in his power every- where. Now, it is not given to a cylinder to move everywhere by its own motion, nor yet to water nor to fire, nor to anything else which is governed by nature or an irrational soul, for the things which check them and stand in the way are many. But intelligence and reason are able to go through everything that opposes them, and in such manner as they are formed by nature and as they choose. Place before thy eyes this facility with which the reason will be carried through all things, as fire upward, as a stone downward, as a cyl- inder doAvn an inclined surface, and seek for nothing further. For all other obstacles either affect the body only which is a dead thing ; or, except through opinion and the yielding of the reason itself, they do not crush nor do any harm of any kind ; for if they did, he who felt it would immediately become bad. Now, in the case of all things which have a certain constitution, whatever harm may happen to any of them, that which is so affected becomes consquently worse ; but in the like case, a man becomes both better, if one may say so, and more worthy of praise by making a right use of these accidents. And finally remember that nothing harms him who is realh'^ a citizen, which does not harm the state ; nor yet does anything harm the state which does not harm law [order] ; and of these things which are called misfortunes not one harms law. What then does not harm law does not harm either state or citizen. 270 THE MEDITATIONS OF 34. To him who is penetrated by true principles even the briefest precept is suflficient, and any common pre- cept, to remind him that he should be free from grief and fear. For example ; Leaves, some the wind scatters on the ground — So is the race of men.* * • Leaves, also, are thy children ; and leaves, too, are they who cry out as if they were worthy of credit and bestow their praise, or on the contrary curse, or secretly blame and sneer ; and leaves, in like manner, are tliose who shall receive and transmit a man’s fame to after-times. For all such things as these “are pro- duced in the season of spring,” as the poet says ; then the wind casts them down; then the forest produces othei" leaves in their places. But a brief existence is common to all things, and yet thou avoidest and pur- suest all things as if they would be eternal. A little time, and thou shalt close thy eyes; and him who has attended thee to thy grave another soon will lament. 35. The healthy eye ought to see all visible things and not to say, I wish for green things ; for this is the condition of a diseased eye. And the healthy hearing and smelling ought to be ready to perceive all that can be heard and smelled. And the healthy stomach ought to be with respect to all food just as the mill with respect to all things which it is formed to grind. And accordingly the healthy understanding ought to be prepared for everything which happens ; but that which says. Let my dear children live, and let all men praise whatever I may do, is an eye which seeks for green things, or teeth which seek for soft things. * Homer, II. vi. 146. MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. sri 36. There is no man so fortunate that there shall not be by him when he is dying some who are pleased with what is going to happen.* Suppose that he was a good and wise man, will there not be at last some one to say to himself, Let us at last breathe freely being relieved from this school-master ? It is true that he was harsh to none of us, but I perceived that he tacitly condemns us. This is what is said of a good man. But in our own case how many other things are there for which there are many who wish to get rid of us. Thou wilt consider this then when thou art dying, and thou wilt depart more contentedly by reflecting thus : I am going away from such a life, in which even my associates in behalf of whom 1 have striven so much, prayed, and cared, themselves wish me to depart, hoping perchance to get some little advantage by it. Why then should a man cling to a longer stay here ? Do not, however, for this reason go awa}^ less kindly disposed to them, but preserving thy own character, and friendly and benevolent and mild, and on the other hand not as if thou wast torn away ; but as when a man dies a quiet death, the poor soul is easily separated from the body, such also ought thy departure from men to be, for nature united thee to them and associated thee. But does she now dissolve the union ? W ell, I am separated as from kinsmen, not however dragged resisting, but without compulsion ; for this too is one of the things according to nature. 37. Accustom thyself as much as possible on the occasion of anything being done by any person to * He says uaxov but as be affirms in other places that death is no evil, he must mean what others may call an evil, and he means only “what is going to happen.” 272 tee meditations OF inquire with thyself, For what object is this man doing this? but begin with thyself, and examine tln^self first. 38. Remember that this which pulls the strings is the thing which is hidden within ; this is the power of persuasion, this is life ; this, if one may so say, is man. In contemplating thyself never include the vessel which surrounds thee, and these instruments which are attached about it. For they are like to an ax, differing only in this that they groAv to the body. For indeed there is no more use in these parts without the cause which moves and checks them than in the weaver’s shuttle, and the writer’s pen, and the driver’s whip.* * See “ The Philosophy of Antoninus,” n. 13. MARCUS AURELIUS AMTONINUS. 273 XI. These are the properties of the rational soul : it sees itself, analyzes itself, and makes itself such as it chooses ; the fruit which it bears itself enjoys — for the fruits of plants and that in animals which corresponds to fruits others enjoy — it obtains its own end, wherever the limit of life may be fixed. Not as in a dance and in a play and in such like things, where the whole action is incomplete, if anything cuts it short ; but in every part and wherever it may be stopped, it makes what has been set before it full and complete, so that it can say, I have what is my own. And further it traverses the whole universe, and the surrounding vacuum, and surveys its form, and it extends itself into the infinity of time, and embraces and comprehends the * periodical renovation of all things, and it com- prehends that those who come after us will see nothing new, nor have those before us seen anything more, but in a manner he who is forty years old, if he has any understanding at all, has seen by virtue of the uni- formity that prevails all things which have been and all that will be. This, too, is a property of the rational soul, love of oner’s neighbor, and truth and modesty, and to value nothing more than itself, Avhich is also the property of Law.:}; Thus, then, right reason differs not at all from the reason of justice. See V. 13, 32 ; x. 7. \ Law is the order by which all things are governed. THE MEDITATIONS OP 2. Thou wilt set little value on pleasing song and dancing and the pancratium, if thou wilt distribute the melody of the voice into its several sounds, and ask thyself as to each, if thou art mastered by this ; for thou wilt be prevented by shame from confessing it : and in the matter of dancing, if at each movement and attitude thou wilt do the same ; and the like also in the matter of the pancratium. In all things, then, except virtue and the acts of virtue, remember to apply thyself to their several parts, and by this division to come to value them little : and apply this rule also to thy whole life. 3. What a soul that is which is ready, if at any moment it must be separated from the body, and ready either to be extinguished or dispersed or con- tinue to exist ; but so that this readiness comes from a man’s own judgment, not from mere obstinacy, as with the Christians,* but considerately and with dignity and in a way to persuade another, without tragic show. 4. Have I done something for the general interest ? Well then I have had my reward. Let this always be present to thy mind, and never stop [doing such good]. 5. What is thy art ? To be good. And how is this accomplished well except by general principles, some about the nature of the universe, and others about the proper constitution of man ? 6. At first tragedies were brought on the stage as means of reminding men of the things which happen * See the Life of Antoninus. This is the only passage in which the emperor speaks of the Christians. Epictetus (iv. 7, 6) names them Galitei. MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. m to them, and that it is according to nature for things to happen so, and that, if you are delighted with what is shown on the stage, you should not be troubled with that which takes place on the larger stage. For you see that these things must be accomplished thus, and that even they bear them who cry out,* “ O Cithaeron.” And, indeed, some things are said well by the dramatic writers, of which kind is the following especially : Me and my children if the gods neglect, This has its reason too4 And again — We must not chafe and fret at that which happens. And— Life’s harvest reap like the wheat’s fruitful ear. And other things of the same kind. After tragedy the old comedy was introduced, which had a magisterial freedom of speech, and by its very plainness of speaking was useful in reminding men to beware of insolence ; and for this purpose too Diogenes used to take from these writers. But as to the middle comedy which came next, observe what it was, and again, for what object the new comedy was introduced, which gradually sunk down into a mere mimic artifice. That some good things are said even by these writers, everybody knows: but the whole plan of such poetry and dramaturgy, to what end does it look ! 7. How plain does it appear that there is not an- * Sopkocles, CEdipus Eex. I See vii. 41, 38, 40. 21G THE MEDITATIONS OE other condition of life so well suited for philosophiz- ing as this in which thou now happenest to be. 8. A branch cut off from the adjacent branch must of necessity be cut off from the whole tree also. So too a man when he is separated from another man has fallen oif from the whole social community. Now as to a branch, another cuts it off, but a man by his own act separates himself from his neighbor when he hates him and turns away from him, and he does not know that he has at the same time cut himself off from the whole social system. Y et he has this priv- ilege certainly from Zeus who framed society, for it is in our power to grow again to that which is near to us, and again to become a part which helps to make up the whole. However, if it often happens, this kind of separation, it makes it difficult for that which detaches itself to be brought to unity and to be re- stored to its former condition. Finally, the branch, which from the first grew together with the tree, and has continued to have one life with it, is not like that which after being cut off is then ingrafted, for this is something like what the gardeners mean when they say that it grows with the rest of the tree, butf that it has not the same mind with it. 9. As those who try to stand in thy way when thou art proceeding according to right reason, will not be able to turn thee aside from th}'^ proper action, so neither let them drive thee from thy benevolent feel- ings toward them, but be on thy guard equally in both matters, not only in the matter of steady judg- ment and action, but also in the matter of gentleness toward tliose who try to hinder or otherwise trouble thee. For this also is a weakness, to be vexed at MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 27 ? them, as well as to be diverted from thy course of action and to ^ive way through fear ; for both are equally deserters from their post, the man who does it through fear, and the man who is alienated from him who is by nature a kinsman and a friend. 10. There is no nature which is inferior to art, for the arts imitate the natures of things. But if this is so, that nature which is the most perfect and the most comprehensive of all natures, cannot fall short of the skill of art. Now all arts do the inferior things for the sake of the superior ; therefore the universal nature does so too. And, indeed, hence is the origin of justice, and in justice the other virtues have their foundation : for justice will . not be observed, if we either care for middle things [things in different], or are easily deceived and careless and chanffeable (v. 16, 30 ; vii. 55). 11. If the things do not come to thee, the pursuits and avoidances of which disturb thee, still in a manner thou goest to them. Let then thy judgment about them be at rest, and they will remain quiet, and thou wilt not be seen either pursuing or avoiding. 12. The spherical form of the soul maintains its figure, when it is neither extended toward any object, nor contracted inward, nor dispersed nor sinks down, but is illuminated by light, by which it sees the truth, the truth of all things and the truth that is in itself (viii. 41, 45 ; xii. 3). 13. Suppose any man shall despise me. Let him look to that himself. But I will look to this, that I be not discovered doing or saying anything deserving of contempt. Shall any man hate me? Let him look to it. But I will be mild and benevolent toward every THE MEElTA'llONS OF 01*^0 *v I O man, and ready to show even him his mistake, not re- proachfully, nor yet as making a display of my endur- ance, but nobly and honestly, like the great Phocion, unless indeed he only assumed it. For the interior [parts] ought to be such, and a man ought to be seen by the gods neither dissatisfied with anything nor complaining. For what evil is it to thee, if thou art now doing what is agreeable to thy own nature, and art satisfied with that which at this moment is suitable to the nature of the universe, since thou art a human being placed at thy post in order that what is for the common advantage may be done in some way ? 14. Men despise one another and flatter one another ; and men wish to raise themselves above one another, and crouch before one another. 15. How unsound and insincere is he who says, I have determined to deal with thee in a fair way. What art thou doing, man? There is no occasion to give this notice. It will soon show itself by acts. The voice ought to be plainly written on the forehead. Such as a man’s character is,f he immediately shows it in his eyes, just as he who is beloved forthwith reads everything in the eyes of lovers. The man who is honest and good ought to be exactly like a man who smells strong, so that the bystander as soon as he comes near him must smell whether he choose or not. But the affectation of simplicity is like a crooked stick.* Nothing is more disgraceful than a wolfish friendship [false friendship]. Avoid this most of all. The good * There is a Greek proverb, “ You cannot make a crooked stick straight.” The wolfish friendship is an illusion to the fable of the sheep and the wolves. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 279 and simple and benevolent show all these things in the eyes, and there is no mistaking. 16. As to living in the best way, this power is in the soul, if it be indifferent to things which are indifferent. And it will be indifferent, if it looks on each of these things separately and all together, and if it remembers that not one of them produces in us an opinion about itself, nor comes to us ; but these things remain im- movable, and it is we ourselves who produce the judg- ments about them, and, as we may say, write them in ourselves, it being in our power not to write them, and it being in our power, if perchance these judgments have imperceptibly got admission to our minds, to wipe them out ; and if we remember also that such attention will only be for a short time, and then life will be at an end. Besides, what trouble is there at all in doing this ? For if these things are according to nature, rejoice in them, and they will be easy to thee ; but if contrary to nature, seek what is conformable to thy own nature, and strive tow^ard this, even if it bring no reputation ; for every man is allowed to seek his own good. 17. Consider whence each thing is come, and of what it consists,t and into what it changes, and what kind of a thing it will be when it has changed, and that it will sustain no harm. 18. [If any have offended against thee, consider first] : What is my relation to men, and that we are made for one another ; and in another respect, I was made to be set over them, as a ram over the flock or a bull over the herd. But examine the matter from first principles, from this : If all things are not mere atoms, it is nature which orders all things ; if this is so, the 280 THE MEDITATIONS OF inferior things exist for the sake of the superior, and these for the sake of one another (ii. 1 ; ix. 39 ; v. 16 ; iii. 4:). Second, consider what kind of men they are at table, in bed, and so forth ; and particularly, under what compulsions in respect of opinions they are ; and as to their acts, consider with what pride they do what they do (viii. 14 ; ix. 34). Third, that if men do rightly what they do, we ought not to be displeased ; but if they do not right, it is plain that they do so involuntarily and in igno- rance. For as every soul is unwillingly deprived of the truth, so also is it unwillingly deprived of the power of behaving to each man according to his deserts. Ac- cordingly men are pained when they are called unjust, ungrateful, and greedy, and in a word wrong-doers to their neighbors (vii. 62, 63 ; ii. 1 ; vii. 26 ; viii. 29). Fourth, consider that thou also doest many things wrong, and that thou art a man like others ; and even if thou dost abstain from certain faults, still thou hast the disposition to commit them, though either through cowardice, or concern about reputation or some such mean motive, thou dost abstain from such faults (i. 17). Fifth, consider that thou dost not even understand whether men are doing wrong or not, for many things are done with a certain reference to circumstances. And, in short, a man must learn a great deal to enable him to pass a correct judgment on another man’s acts (ix. 38 ; iv. 51). Sixth, consider when thou art much vexed or grieved, that man’s life is only a moment, and, after a short time, we are all laid out dead (vii. 58 ; iv. 48). Seventh, that it is not men’s acts which disturb us, MARCUS A URELIU8 ANTONINUS. 281 for those acts have their foundation in men’s ruling principles, hut it is our own opinions which disturb us. Take away these opinions then, and resolve to dismiss thy judgment about an act as if it were something grievous, and thy anger is gone. How, then, shall I take away these opinions ? By reflecting that no wrongful act of another brings shame on thee : for unless that which is shameful is alone bad, thou also must of necessity do many things wrong, and become a robber and everything else (v. 25 ; vii. 16). Eighth, consider how much more pain is brought on us h}^ the anger and vexation caused by such acts than by the acts themselves, at which we are angry and vexed (iv. 39, 49 ; vii. 24). Ninth, consider that a good disposition is invincible, if it be genuine, and not an affected smile and acting a part. For what Avill the most violent man do to thee, if thou continuest to be of a kind disposition toward him, and if, as opportunity offers, thou gently admonishest him and calmly correctest his errors at the very time when he is trying to do thee harm, saying. Not so, my child ; we are constituted by nature for something else : I shall certainly not be injured, hut thou art injuring thyself, my child. And show him with gentle tact and by general principles that this is so, and that even bees do not do as he does, nor any animals which are formed by nature to be gregari- ous. And thou must do this neither with any double meaning nor in the Ava}’’ of reproach, but affectionately and without any rancour in thy soul ; and not as if thou wert lecturing him, nor yet that any bystander may admire, but either when he is alone, and if others are present . . * It appears that there is a defect in the text here. 282 TEE MEDITATIONS OF Eemember these nine rules, as if thou hadst received them as a gift from the Muses, and begin at last to be a man while thou livest. But thou must equally avoid flattering men and being vexed at them, for both are unsocial and lead to harm. And let this truth be present to thee in the excitement of anger, that to be moved by passion is not manly, but that mildness and gentleness, as they are more agreeable to human nature, so also are they more manly ; and he who possesses these qualities possesses strength, nerves and courage, and not the man who is subject to fits of passion and discontent. For in the same degree in which a man’s mind is nearer to freedom from aU passion, in the same degree also is it nearer to strength : and as tlie sense of pain is a characteristic of weak- ness, so also is anger. For he who yields to pain and he wlio yields to anger, both are wounded and both submit. But if thou wilt, receive also a tenth present from the leader of the [Muses Apollo], and it is this — that to expect bad men not to do wrong is madness, for he Avho expects this desires an impossibility. But to allow men to behave so to others, and to expect them not to do thee any wrong, is irrational and tyrannical. 19. There are four principal aberrations of the superior faculty against which thou shouldst be con- stantly on thy guard, and when thou hast detected them, thou shouldst wipe them out and say on each occasion thus : this thought is not necessary : this tends to destroy social union : this which thou art going to say comes not from the real thoughts ; for thou shouldst consider it among the most absurd of things for a man MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 283 not to speak from his real thoughts. But the fourth is when thou shalt reproach thyself for anything, for this is an evidence of the diviner part within thee being overpowered and yielding to the less honourable and to the perishable part, the body, and to its gross pleasures (iv. 24 ; ii. 16). 20. Thy aerial part and all the fiery parts which are mingled in thee, though by nature they have an upward tendency, still in obedience to the disposition of the universe they are overpowered here in the compound mass [the body]. And also the whole of the earthly part in thee and the watery, though their tendency is downward, still are raised up and occupy a position which is not their natural one. In this manner then the elemental parts obey the universal, for when they have been fixed in any place perforce they remain there until again the universal shall sound the signal for dissolution. Is it not then strange that thy intelligent part only should be disobedient and discontented with its own place ? And yet no force is imposed on it, but only those things which are comformable to its nature : still it does not submit, but is carried in the opposite direction. For the movement towards injustice and intemperance and to anger and grief and fear is nothing else than the act of one who deviates from nature. And also when the ruling faculty is discontented with anything that happens, then toojt deserts its post : for it is constituted for piety and reverence toward the gods no less than for justice. For these quahties also are comprehended under the generic term of content- ment with the constitution of things, and indeed they . are prior* to acts of justice. ... *Tlie word "wliich is here translated " prior,” may algg mean 284 THE MEDITATIONS OF 21. He who has not one and always the same object in life, cannot be one and the same all through his life. But what I have said is not enough, unless this also is added, what this object ought to be. For as there is not the same opinion about all the things which in some way or other are considered by the majority to be good, but only about some certain things, that is, things which concern the common interest ; so also ought we to propose to ourselves an object which shall be of a common kind [social] and political. For he who directs all his own efforts to this object, will make all his acts alike, and thus will always be the same. 22. Think of the country mouse and of the town mouse, and of the alarm and trepidation of the town mouse.* 23. Socrates used to call the opinions of the many by the name of Lamiae, bugbears to frighten children. “ superior but Antoninus seems to say that piety and reverence of the gods precede all virtues, and that other virtues are derived from them, even justice, which in another passage (xi. 10) he makes the foundation of all virtues. The ancient notion of justice is that of giving to every one his due. It is not a legal definition, as some have sup- posed, hut a moral rule which law cannot in all cases enforce. Besides law has its own rules, which are sometimes moral and some- times immoral ; but it enforces them all simply because they are general rules, and if it did not or could not enforce them, so far Law would not be Law. Justice, or the doing what is just, implies a universal rule and obedience to it ; and as we all live under universal Law, which commands both our body and our intelligence, and is the law of our nature, that is the law of the whole constitution of man, we must endeavor to discover what this supreme Law is. It is the will of the power that rules all . By acting in obedience to this will, we do justice, and by consequence everything else that we ought to do. * The story is told by Horace ip hie Satires (ii. 6), and by others sin'cs, but not better. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 285 24. The Lacedaemonians at their public spectacles used to set seats in the shade for strangers, but them- selves sat down anywhere. 25. Socrates excused himself to Perdiccas * for not going to him, saying. It is because I would not perish b}'^ the worst of all ends, that is, I would not receive a favor and then be unable to return it. 26. In the writings of the [Ephesians] there was this precept, constantly to think of some one of the men of former times who practiced virtue. 27. The Pythagoreans bid us in the morning look to the heavens that we may be reminded of those bodies which continually do the same things and in the same manner perform their work, and also be re- minded of their purity and nudity. For there is no veil over a star. 28. Consider what a man Socrates was when he dressed himself in a skin, after Xanthippe had taken his cloak and gone out, and Avhat Socrates said to his friends who were ashamed of him and drew back from him when they saw him dressed thus. 29. Neither in writing nor in reading wilt thou be able to lay down rules for others before thou shalt have first learned to obey rules thyself. Much more is this so in life. 30. A slave thou art ; free speech is not for thee. 31. And my heart laughed within (Od. ix. 413). 32. And virtue they will curse speaking harsh woi’ds (Hesiod, Works and Days, 184). 33. To look for the fig in winter is a madman’s act : * Perhaps the emperor made a mistake here, for other writers say that it was Archelaus, the son of Perdiccas, wlro invited Socrates to Macedonia. 286 THE MEDITATIONS OF such is he who looks for his child when it is no longer allowed (Epictetus, hi. 2d, 87). 34. When a man kisses his child, said Epictetus, he should whisper to himself, “To-morrow perchance thou wilt die.” But those are words of bad omen. “No word is a wo"d of bad omen,” said Epictetus, “ which expresses any work of nature; or if it is so, it is also a word of bad omen to speak of the ears of corn being reaped ” (Epictetus, iii. 24, 88). 35. The unripe grape, the ripe bunch, the dried grape all are changes, not into notliing, but into something which exists not yet (Epictetus, iii. 24). 36. No man can rob us of our free will (Epictetus, iii. 22, 105). 37. Epictetus also said, a man must discover an art [or rules] with respect to giving his assent ; and in respect to his movements he must be careful that they be made with regard to circumstances, that they be consistent with social interests, that they have regard to the value of the object ; and as to sensual desire, he should altogether keep away from it; and as to avoidance [aversion] he should not show it with respect to any of the things which are not in our power. 38. The dispute then, he said, is not about any com- mon matter, but about being mad or not. 39. Socrates used to say. What do you want ? Souls of rational men or irrational ? Souls of rational men. Of what rational men? Sound or unsound? Sound. W hy then do you not seek for them ? Be- cause we have them. Why then do you fight and quarrel ? MARCUS AURELIUS AETONINUS. 287 XII. All those things at which thou wishest to arrive by a circuitous road, thou canst have now, if thou dost not refuse them to thyself. And this means, if thou wilt take no notice of all the past, and trust the future to providence, and direct the present only conformably to piety and justice. Conformably to piety, that thou ma3mst be content with the lot which is assigned to thee, for nature designed it for thee and thee for it. Conformably to justice, that thou majmst always speak the truth freely and without disguise, and do the things which are agreeable to law and according to the worth of each. And let neither another man’s wickedness hinder thee, nor opinion nor vmice, nor yet the sensations of the poor flesh which has grown about thee ; for the passive part will look to this. If then, whatever the time may be when thou shalt be near to thy departure, neglecting everjflhing else thou shalt 'respect only thy ruling faculty and the divinity within thee, and if thou shalt be afraid not because thou must some time cease to live, but if thou shalt fear never to have begun to live according to nature, then thou wilt be a man worthy of the universe which has produced thee, and thou wilt cease to be a stranger in thy native land, and to wonder at things which happen daily as if they were something unexpected, and to be depend- ent on this or that. 2. God sees the minds (ruling principles) of aU men 288 THE MEDITATIONS OF bared of the material vesture and rind and impurities. For with his intellectual part alone he touches the intelligence only which has flowed and been derived from himself into these bodies. And if thou also usest thyself to do this, thou wilt rid thyself of thy much trouble. For he who regards not tlie poor flesh which envelops him, surely will not trouble himself by look- ing after raiment and dwelling and fame and such like externals and show. 3. The things are three of which thou art composed, a little body, a little breath [life], intelligence. Of these the first two are thine, so far as it is thy duty to take care of them ; but the third alone is properly thine. Therefore, if thou shalt separate from thyself, that is, from thy understanding, whatever others do or say, and whatever thou hast done or said thyself, and whatever future things trouble thee because they may happen, and whatever in the body which envelops thee, or in the breath [life], which is by nature associ- ated with the body, is attached to thee independent of thy will, and whatever the external circumfluent vortex whirls round, so that the intellectual power exempt from the things of fate can live pure and free by itself, doing what is just and accepting what happens and saying the truth : if thou wilt separate, I say, from this ruling faculty the things which are attached to it by the impressions of sense, and the things of time to come and of time that is past, and wilt make thyself like Empedocles’ sphere : All round, and in its joyous rest reposing;* and if thou shalt strive to live only what is really thy * The verse of Empedocles is corrupt in Antoninus. MARCUS AURELIUS AMTONINUS. 289 life, that is, the present, then thou wilt be able to pass that portion of life which remains for thee up to the time of thy death, free from perturbations, nobly, and obedient to thy own demon [to the god that is within thee] (ii. 13, 17 ; hi. 5, 6 ; xi. 12). 4:. I have often wondered how it is that every man loves himself more than all the rest of men, but yet sets less yalue on his own opinion of himself than on the opinion of others. If then a god or a wise teacher should present himself to a man and bid him to think of nothing and to design nothing which he would not express as soon as he conceived it, he could not endure it even for a single day. So much more respect have we to what our neighbors shall think of us than to what we shall think of ourselves. 5. How can it be that the gods, after having arranged all things well and benevolently for mankind, have overlooked this alone, that some men and very good men, and men who, as we may say, have had most communion with the divinity, and through pious acts and religious observances have been most intimate with the divinity, when they have once died should never exist again, but sJiould be completely extin- guished ? But if this is so, be assured that if it ought to have been otherwise, the gods would have done it. Bor if it were just, it would also be possible; and if it were according to nature, nature would have had it so. But because it is not so, if in fact it is not so, be thou convinced that it ought not to have been so : for thou seest even of thyself that in this inquiry thou art dis- puting with the deity ; and we should not thus dispute with the gods, unless they were most excellent and 290 THE MEDITATIONS OF most just; but if this is so, they would not have allowed anything in the ordering of the universe to be neglected unjustly and irrationally. 6. rractice thyself even in the things which thou despairest of accomplishing. For even the left hand, which is ineffectual for all other things for want of practice, holds the bridle more vigorously than the right hand ; for it has been practiced in this. 7. Consider in what condition, both in body and soul, a man should be when he is overtaken by death ; and consider the shortness of life, the boundless abyss of time, past and future, the feebleness of all matter. 8. Contemplate the formative principles [forms] of things bare of their coverings ; the purposes of actions ; consider what pain is, what pleasure is, and death, and fame; who is to himself the cause of his uneasiness; how no man is hindered by another ; that everything is opinion. 9. In the application of thy principles thou must be like the pancratiast, not like the gladiator ; for the gladiator lets fall the sword which he uses and is killed ; but the other always has his hand, and needs to do nothing else than use it. 10. See what things are in themselves, dividing them into matter, form and purpose. 11. What a power man has to do nothing except what God will approve, and to accept all that God may give him. 12. With respect to that which happens conformably to nature, we ought to blame neither gods, for they do nothing wrong either voluntarily or involuntarily, nor men, for they do nothing wrong except involuntarily. Consequently we should blame nobody (ii. 11, 12, 13 ; vii. 62 ; viii. 17). MARCUS A URBLIUS ANTONINUS. 291 13. How ridiculous and what a stranger he is who is surprised at anything which happens in life. 14:. Either there is a fatal necessity and invincible order, or a kind providence, or a confusion without a purpose and Avithout a director (iv. 27). If then there is an invincible necessity, why dost thou resist % But if there is a providence which allows itself to be pro- pitiated, make thyself worthy of the help of the divinity. But if there is a confusion without a governor, be content that in such a tempest thou hast in thyself a certain ruling intelligence. And even if the tempest carry thee away, let it carry away the poor flesh, the poor breath, everything else ; for the intelligence at least it will not carry away. 15. Does the light of the lamp shine Avithout losing its splendor until it is extinguished ; and shall the truth which is in thee and justice and temperance be extinguished [before thy death] ? 16. When a man has presented the appearance of having done wrong, [say], How then do I knoAV if this is a wrongful act ? And even if he has done Avrong, how do I knoAV that he has not condemned himself ? and so this is like tearing his own face. Consider that he, Avho Avould not have the bad man do Avrong, is like the man Avho Avould not have the fig-tree to bear juice in the figs, and infants to cry, and the horse to neigh, and whatever else must of necessity be. For what must a man do Avho has such a character ? If then thou art irritable,f cure this man’s disposition.* * The interpreters translate yopyoZ by the words “acer, valid- usque,” and “skillful.” But in Epictetus (ii. 16, 20 ; iii. 12, 10) this word means “vehement,” “prone to anger,” “irritable,” 292 THE MEDITATIONS OF 17. If it is not right, do not do it : if it is not true, do not say it. [For let thy efforts be ]* 18. In everything always observe what the thing is which produces for thee an appearance, and resolve it by dividing it into the formal, the material, the pur- pose, and the time within which it must end. 19. Perceive at last that thou hast in thee something better and more divine than the things which cause the various effects, and, as it were, pull thee by the strings. What is there nowin my mind? is it fear, or suspicion, or desire, or anything of the kind? (v. ii.) 20. First, do nothing inconsiderately, nor without a purpose. Second, make thy acts refer to nothing else than to a social end. 21. Consider that before long thou wilt be nobody and nowhere, nor will any of the things exist which thou now seest, nor any of those who are now living. For all things are formed by nature to change and be turned and to perish in order that other things in con- tinuous succession may exist (ix 28). 22. Consider that everything is opinion, and opinion is in thy power. Take away then, when thou choos- est, th}^ opinion, and like a mariner, who has doubled the promontory, thou wilt find calm, everything stable, and a waveless bay. 23. Any one activity, whatever it may be, when it has ceased at its proper time, suffers no evil because it has ceased ; nor he wlio has done this act, does he suffer any evil for this reason that the act has ceased. In like manner then the whole which consists of all the acts, which is our life, if it cease at its proper time, suffers no evil for this reason that it has ceased ; nor * There is something wrong here, or incomplete. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 293 he who has terminated this series at the proper time, has he been ill dealt with. But the proper time and the limit nature fixes, sometimes as in old age the peculiar nature of man, but always the universal nature, by the change of whose parts the whole uni- verse continues ever young and perfect. And every thing which is useful to the universal is alwa^'s good and in season. Therefore the termination of life for every man is no evil, because neither is it shameful, since it is both independent of the will and not opposed to the general interest, but it is good, since it is sea- sonable and profitable to and congruent with the uni- versal. For thus too he is moved by the deity who is moved in the same manner with the deity and moved toward the same things in his mind. 2d. These three principles thou must have in readi- ness. In the things which thou doest do nothing either inconsiderately or otherwise than as justice herself would act ; but with respect to what may happen to thee from without, consider that it happens either by chance or according to providence, and thou must neither blame chance nor accuse providence. Second, consider what every being is from the seed to the time of its receiving a soul, and from the reception of a soul to the giving back of the same, and of what things every being is compounded and into what things it is resolved. Third, if thou shouldst suddenly be raised up above the earth, and shouldst look down on human things, and observe the variety of them how great it is, and at the same time also shouldst see at a glance how great is the number of beings who dwell all around in the air and the ether, consider that as often as thou shouldst be raised up, thou wouldst see the 294 TBE MEDITATIONS OE same things, sameness of form and shortness of dura- tion. Are these things to be proud of ? 25. Cast away opinion : thou art saved. Who then hinders thee from casting it away ? 26. When thou art troubled about anything, thou hast forgotten this, that all things happen according to the universal nature ; and forgotten this, that a man’s wrongful act is nothing to thee ; and further thou hast forgotten this, that everything which happens, always happened so and will happen so, and now happens so everywhere ; forgotten this, too, how close is the kinship between a man and the whole human race, for it is a community, not of a little blood or seed, but of intelligence. And thou hast forgotten this too, that every man’s intelligence is a god, and is an efflux of the deity;* and forgotten this, that nothing is. a man’s OAvn, but that his child and his body and his very soul came from the deity ; forgotten this, that everything is opinion ; and lastly thou hast forgotten that every man lives the present time only, and loses only this. 27. Constantly bring to thy recollection those who have complained greatly about anything, those who have been most conspicuous by the greatest fame or misfortunes or enmities or fortunes of anj^ kind : then think where are they all now ? Smoke and ash and a tale, or not even a tale. And let there be present to thy mind also everything of this sort, how Fabius Catullinus lived in the country, and Lucius Lupus in his gardens, and Stertinius at Baiae, and Tiberius at Capreae, and Velius Rufus [or Rufus at Yelia] ; and in fine think of the eager pursuit of anything cojoined with pride * See Epictetus, ii. 8, 9, etc. t Epict. i. 8, 6. MARCUS A URELIUS ANTONINUS. 295 and how worthless everything is after which men violently strain ; and how much more philosophical it is for a man in the opportunities presented to him to show himself just, temperate, obedient to the gods, and to do this with all simplicity : for the pride which is proud of its want of pride is the most iniolerable of all. 28. To those who ask. Where hast thou seen the gods, or how dost thou comprehend that they exist and so worshipest them, I answer, in the first place, they may be seen even with the eyes ;* in the second place neither have I seen even my own soul and yet I honor it. Thus then with respect to the gods, from what I con- stantly experience of their power, from this I compre- hend that they exist and I venerate them. 29. The safety of life is this, to examine everything ■* “Seen even with the eyes.” It is supposed that this may be explained hy the Stoic doctrine, that the universe is a god or living being (iv. 40), and that the celestial bodies are gods (viii. 19). But the emperor may mean that we know that the gods exist, as he after- wards states it, because we see what they do ; as we know that man has intellectual powers, because we see what he does, and in no other way do we know it. This passage then will agree with the passage in the Epistle to the Romans (i. v. 20), and with the Epistle to the Colossians (i. 15), in which Jesus Christ is named “the image of the invisible god and with the passage in the Gospel of St. John (xiv. v. 9). Gataker, whose notes are a wonderful collection of learrlng, and all of it sound and good, quotes a passage of Calvin which is founded on St. Paul’s language (Rom. 1. ®. 20) ; “ God by creating the uni- verse [or world, mundum], being himself invisible, has presented himself to our eyes conspicuously in a certain visible form.” He also quotes Seneca (De Benef. iv. c. 8) : “ Quocunque te flexeris, ibi ilium videbie occurrentem tibi : nihil ab illo vacat, opussuum ipse implet.” Compare also Cicero, De Senectute (c. 22), Xenophon’s Cyropsedia (viii. 7) and Mem. iv. 3 ; also Epictetus, i. 6, de Providentia. I think that my iaterpretation of Antoninus is right! 296 THE MEDITATIONS OF all through, what it is itself, what is its material, what the formal part ; with all thy soul to do justice and to say the truth. What remains except to enjoy life by joining one good thing to another so as not to leave even the smallest intervals between. 30. There is one light of the sun, though it is inter- rupted by walls, mountains, and other things infinite. There is one common substance,* though it is distributed among countless bodies which have their several qualities. There is one soul, though it is distributed among infinite natures and individual circumscriptions [or individuals]. There is one intelligent soul, though it seems to be divided. Now in the things which have been mentioned all the other parts, such as those which are air and matter, are without sensation and have no fellowship : and yet even these parts the intelligent principle holds together, and the gravitation toward the same. But intellect in a peculiar manner tends to that which is of the same kin, and combines with it, and the feeling for communion is not interrupted. 31. What dost thou wish? To continue to exist? W ell, dost thou wish to have sensation ? movement ? growth? and then again to cease to grow? to use thy speech? to think? What is there of all these things which seem to thee worth desiring ? But if it is easy to set little value on all these things, turn to that which remains, which is to follow reason and god. But it is inconsistent with honoring reason and god to be troubled because by death a man will be deprived of the other things. 32. How small a part of the boundless and unfath- * iv. 40. MABCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS. 297 omable time is assigned to every man ? For it is very soon swallowed up in the eternal. And how small a part of the whole substance ? And how small a part of the universal soul ? And on what a small clod of the whole earth thou creepest ? Reflecting on all this consider nothing to be great, except to act as thy nature leads thee, and to endure that which the common nature brings. 33. How does the ruling faculty make use of itself? For all lies in this. But everything else, whether it is in the power of thy will or not, is only lifeless ashes and smoke. 34. This reflection is most adapted to move us to contempt of death, that even those who think pleasure to be a good, and pain an evil, still have despised it. 35. The man to whom that only is good which comes in due season, and to whom it is the same thing whether he has done more or fewer acts conformable to right reason, and to whom it makes no difference whether he contemplates the world for a longer or a shorter time — for this man neither is death a terrible thing (hi. 7 ; vi. 23 ; x. 20 ; xii. 23). 36. JMan, thou hast been a citizen in this great state [the world] : * what difference does it make to thee whether for five years [or three]? For that which is conformable to the laws is just for all. Where is the hardship then, if no tyrant nor yet an unjust judge sends thee away from the state, but nature who brought thee into it? The same as if a praetor who has employed an actor dismisses him from the stage.* “ But I have not finished the five acts, but only three *ii. 16; iii. 11: jv. 29. 8 J Si; 1. 298 THE MEDITATIONS OF ANTONINUS. of them.” Thou sayest well, but in life the three acts are the whole drama; for what shall be a complete drama is determined by him who was once the cause of its composition, and now of its dissolution : but thou art the cause of neither. Depart then satisfied, for he also who releases thee is satisfied. INDEX **♦ Tte paragraphs (par.) and lines (1.) are those of the sections. Active, man is by nature, ix. 16. Advice from the good to be taken, vi. 21; viii. 16. Affectation, vii. 60; viii. 30; xi. 18 (par. 9), 19. Anger discouraged, vi. 26, 27 ; xi. 18. Anger, offenses of, ii. 10. Anger, uselessness of, v. 28; viii. 4. Appearances not to be regarded, v. 36; vi. 3, 13. Astonishment should not be felt at anything that happens, viii. 15; xii. 1, 13. Attainment, what is within everyone’s, vii. 67; viii, 8. Attention to what is said or done, vi. 53; vii. 4, 30; viii. 22. Bad, the, ii. 1. Beautiful, the, li. 1. Causal. See Formal. Change keeps the world ever new, vii. 25; viii. 50(1. 13); xii. 23 (1. 13). Change, law of, iv. 3, 36; v. 13, 23; vi. 4, 15, 36; vii. 18; viii. 6; ix. 19, 28 (par. 2), 35; x. 7; xii. 21. Change, no evil in, iv. 42. Christians, the, xi. 3. Circle, things come round in a, ii. 14. Comedy, new, xi. 6. Comedy, old, xi. 6. Complaining, uselessness of, viii. 17, 50. Connection. See Universe. Conquerors are robbers, x. 10. Contentment. See Resignation. Co-operation. See Mankind and Universe. 300 INDEX. Demon, the, ii. 13, 17; iii. 6 (1. 8), 7, 16 (1. 14); v. 10, 27; xii. 3. Death, ii. 11, 12, 17; iii. 3, 7; iv. 5; v. 33; vi. 2, 24, 28; vii. 32; viii. 20, 58; is. 3, 21; x. 36; xii. 23, 34, 35. Death inevitable, iii. 3; iv. 3 (1. 19), 6, 32, 48, 50; v. 33; vi. 47; viii. 25, 31. Desire, offenses of, ii. 10. Destiny, iii. 11 (1. 23); iv. 26; v. 8 (1. 10, etc.), 24; vii. 57; x. 5. Discontent. See Resignation. Doubts discussed, vi. 10; vii. 75; ix. 28, 39; xii. 5, 14. Duty, all importance of, vi. 2, 22; x. 22. Earth, insignificance of the, iii. 10; iv. 3 (par. 2); vi. 36; viii. 21; xii. 32. Earthly things, transitory nature of, ii. 12, 17; iv. 32, 33, 35, 48; v. 23; vi. 15, 36; vii. 21, 34; viii. 21, 25; x. 18, 31; xii. 27. Earthly things, worthlessness of, ii. 12; v. 10; 33; vi. 15; vii. 3; ix. 24, 36; xi. 2; xii. 27. Equanimity, x. 8. Example, we should not follow bad, vi. 6; vii. 65. Existence, meanness of, viii. 24. Existence, the object of, v. 1; viii. 19. External things cannot really harm a man, or affect the soul, ii. 11 (1, 12); iv. 3, 8, 39, 49 (par. 2); v. 35; vii. 64; viii. 1, 32, 51 (par. 2); ix. 31; X. 33. Failure, x. 12. Fame, worthlessness of, iii. 10; iv. 3 (1. 38), 19, 33 (1. 10); v. 33; vi. 16, 18; viii. 34; viii. 1, 44; ix. 30. Fear, what we ought to, xii. 1 (1. 19). Fellowship. See Mankind. Few things necessary for a virtuous and happy life, ii. 5; iii. 10; vii. 67; X. 8 (1. 24). Flattery, xi. 18 (par. 10). Formal, the, and the material, iv. 21 (par. 2); v. 13; vii. 10, 29; viii. 11; ix. 25; xii. 8, 10, 18. Future, we should not be anxious about the, vii. 8; viii. 36; xii. 1. Gods, perfect j ustice of the, xii. 5 (par. 2). Gods, the, vi. 44; xii. 28. Gods, the, cannot be evil, ii. 11; vi. 44. Good, the, ii. 1. INDEX. 301 Habit of thought, v. 16. Happiness, what is true, v. 9, 34; viii. 1; x. 33. Help to be accepted from others, vii. 7. Heroism, true, xi. 18 (par. 10). Ignorance. See Wrong-doing. Independence. See Self-reliance. Indifferent things, ii. 11; iv. 39; vi. 33; ix. 1 (1. 29). Individual, the. See Interests. Infinity. See Time. Ingratitude. See Mankind. Injustice, ix. 1. Intelligent soul, rational beings participate in the same, iv. 40; ix. 8, 9; X. 1 (1. 15); xii. 26, 30. Interests of the whole and the individual identical, iv. 23; v. 8 (1. 30); vi. 45, 54; x. 6, 20, 33; xii. 23 (1. 13). Justice, V. 34; x. 11; xi. 10. Justice and reason identical, xi. 1. Justice prevails everywhere, iv. 10. Leisure, we ought to have some, viii. 51. Life, a good, everywhere possible, v. 16. Life can only be lived once, ii. 14; x. 31 (1. 10). Life, shortness of, ii. 4, 17; iii. 10, 14; iv. 17, 48, 60; vi. 15, 36, 56; x. 31, 34. Life to be made a proper use of, without delay, ii. 4; iii. 1, 14; iv. 17, 37; vii. 56; viii. 32; x. 31 (1. 15); xii. 1 (1. 15). Life, whether long or short, matters not, vi. 49; ix. 33; xii. 36. Magnanimity, x. 8. Mankind, co-operation and fellowship of , one with another, ii. 1 (1. 12), 16; iii. 4, 11; iv. 4, 33; v. 16 (1. 13), 20; vi. 7, 14, 23, 39; vii. 5, 13, 33, 55; viii. 13, 26, 34, 43, 59; ix. 1, 9, 23, 31, 42; x. 36 (1. 13); xi. 8, 31; xii. 20. Mankind, folly and baseness of, v. 10 (1. 10); ix. 2, 3 (1. 15), 29; x. 15, 19. Mankind, ingratitude of, x. 36. Material, the. See Formal. Nature, after products of, iii. 2; vi. 36. 302 INDEX. Nature, bounds fixed by, v. 1. Nature, man formed by, to bear all that happens to him, v. 18; viii. 46. Nature, nothing evil, which is according to, ii. 17; vi. 33. Nature of the universe. See Universe, nothing that happens is con- trary to the nature of the. Nature, perfect beauty of, iii. 2; vi. 36. Nature, we should live according to, iv. 48, 51; v. 3, 25; vi. 16 (1. 14); vii. 15, 55; viii. 1, 54; x. 33. New, nothing under the sun, ii. 14 (1. 12); iv. 44; vi. 37, 46; vii. 1, 49; viii. 6; ix. 14; x. 27; xi. 1. Object, we should always act with a view to some, ii. 7, 16 (1. 16); iii. 4; iv. 2; viii. 17; x. 37; xi. 21; xii, 20. Obsolete, all things become, iv. 33. Omission, sins of, ix. 5. Opinion, iv. 3, 7, 12, 39; vi. 52, 57; vii. 2, 14, 16, 26, 68; viii. 14, 29, 40, 47, 49, ix. 13, 29 (1. 10), 32, 42 (1. 22); x. 3; xi. 16, 18; xii. 22, 25. Others’ conduct not to be inquired into, iii. 4; iv. 18; v. 25. Others, opinion of, to be disregarded, viii. 1 (1. 10); x. 8 (1. 13), 11; xi. 13; xii. 4. Others, we should be lenient toward, ii. 13; iii. 11; iv. 3(1. 19); v. 33 (1. 19); vi. 20, 27; vii. 26, 62, 63, 70; ix. 11, 27; x. 4; xi. 9, 13, 18; xii. 16. Others, we should examine the ruling principles of, iv. 38; ix. 18, 22, 27, 34. Ourselves often to blame, for expecting men to act contrary to their nature, ix. 42 (1. 26). Ourselves, reformation should begin with, xi. 29. Ourselves, we should judge, x. 30; xi. 18 (par. 4). Pain, vii. 33, 64; viii. 28. Perfection not to be expected in this world, ix. 29 (1. 8). Perseverance, v. 9; x. 12. Persuasion, to be used, vi. 50. Perturbation, vi. 16; vii. 58; ix. 31. Pessimism, ix. 35. Philosophy, v. 9; vi. 12; ix. 41 (1. 13). Pleasure, he who pursues, is guilty of impiety, ix. 1 (1. 21). INDEX. 303 Pleasures are enjoyed by the bad, vi. 34; ix. 1 (1. 25). Power, things in our own, v. 5, 10; vi. 32, 41, 52, 58; vii. 2, 14, 54, 68; X. 32, 33. Power, things not in our own, v. 33; vi. 41. Practice is good, even in things which we despair of accomplishing, xii. 6. Praise, worthlessness of, iii. 4; iv. 20; vi. 16, 59; vii. 62; viii. 52, 53; ix. 34. Prayer, the right sort of, v. 7; ix. 40. Present time the only thing a man really possesses, ii. 14; iii. 10; viii. 44; xii. 3. Procrastination. See Life to be made a proper use of, etc. Puppet pulled by strings of desire, ii. 2; iii. 16; vi. 16, 28; vii. '3, 29; xii. 19. Rational soul. See Ruling part. Rational soul, spherical form of the, viii. 41; xi. 12; xii. 3 (and see Ruling part). Reason, all-prevailing, v. 32; vi. 1, 40. Reason and nature identical, vii. 11. Reason, the, can adapt everything that happens to its own use, v. 20; vi. 8; vii. 68 (1. 14); viii. 35; x. 31. Reason, we should live according to. See Nature. Repentance does not follow renouncement of pleasure, viii. 10. Resignation and contentment, iii. 4 (1. 23, etc.), 16 (1. 11, etc.); iv. 23, 31, 33, 34; v. 8, 33 (1. 14); vi. 16, 44, 49; vii. 27, 57; ix. 37; x. 1, 11, 14, 25, 28, 35. Revenge, best kind of, vi. 6. Rising from bed, v. 1; viii. 12. Ruling part, the, ii. 2; iv. 1; v. 11, 19, 21, 26; vi. 14, 35; vii. 16, 55 (par. 2); viii. 45, 48, 56, 57, 60, 61; ix. 15, 26; x. 24, 33 (1. 17), 38; xi. 1, 19, 20; xii. 3, 14. Self reliance and steadfastness of soul, iii. 5, 12; iv. 11, 29 (1. 3), 49 (par. 1); v. 3, 34 (1. 3); vi. 44 (1. 17); vii. 12, 15; ix. 28 (1. 8), 29; xii, 14. Self-restraint, v. 33. Self, we should retire into, iv. 3 (1. 6 and par. 2); vii. 28, 33, 59; viii. 48. Senses, movements of the, to be disregarded, v. 31 (1. 10); vii. 55 (par, 2); viii. 26, 39; x. 8 (1. 17); xi. 19; xii. 1 (1. 12). 304 INDEX. Sickness, behavior in, ix. 41. Social. See Mankind. Steadfastness of soul. See Self-reliance. Substance, the universal, iv. 40; v. 24; vii. 19, 23; xii. 7, 30. Suicide, v. 29; viii. 47; x. 8 (1. 27). Time compared to a river, iv. 43. Time, infinity of, iv. 3 (1. 38), 50; v. 24; ix. 32; xii. 7, 32. Tragedy, xi. 6. Tranquillity of soul, iv. 3; vi. 11; vii. 68; viii. 28. Ugly, the, ii. 1. Unintelligible things, v. 10. Universe, harmony of the, iv. 27, 45; v. 8 (1. 15). Universe, intimate connection and co operation of all things in the, one with another, ii. 3, 9; iv. 29; v. 8, 30; vi. 38, 42, 43; vii. 9, 19, 68; viii. 7; ix. 1; x. 1. Universe, nothing that dies falls out of the, viii, 18, 50 (1. 11); x. 7 (1. 21 ). Universe, nothing that happens is contrary to the nature of the, v. 8, 10; vi. 9, 58; viii. 5; xii. 26. Unnecessary things, v. 15. Unnecessary thoughts, words and actions, iii. 4; iv. 24. Vain professions, x. 16; xi. 15. Virtue, vi. 17. Virtue its own reward, v. 6; vii. 73; ix. 42 (1. 40); xi. 4, Virtue, omnipotence of, iv. 16. Virtue, pleasure in contemplating, vi. 48. "Whole, integrity of the, to be preserved, v. 8. Whole, the. See Interests. Wickedness has always existed, vii. 1. Wickedness must exist in the world, viii. 15, 50; ix. 42; xi. 18 (par. 11); xii. 16. Worst evil, the, ix. 2 (1. 8). Worth and importance, things of real, iv. 33; v. 10 (1. 17); vi. 16, 30 (1. 3), 47; vii. 20, 44, 46, 58, 66; viii. 2, 3, 5; ix. 6, 12; x. 8 (1. 24), 11; xii. 1, 27, 31, 33. INDEX. 305 Wrong-doing cannot really harm any one, vii. 22; viii. 55; is. 42(1. 20); X. 13 (par. 1); si. 18 (par. 7). Wrong-doing injures the wrong-doer, iv. 26; is. 4, 38; si. 18 (par. 3). Wrong-doing owing to ignorance, ii. 1, 13; vi. 27; vii. 22, 26, 62, 63; si. 18; xii. 12. Wrong-doing to be left where it is, vii. 29; is. 20. ■ ^ TFIANS.FROMPL 1993 DUKE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27706