•r _ c/ JSetternunt of ïtfe AN EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION MACHINE A NATIONAL NECESSITY BY HOWARD ELLIOTT President, Northern Pacific Railway Company, New York, N. Y. An address delivered at the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the ASSOCIATION OF LIFE INSURANCE PRESIDENTS At New York, December 4, 1919 AN EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION MACHINE A NATIONAL NECESSITY By Howard Elliott President, Northern Pacific Railway Company, New York, N. Y. an address delivered at the thirteenth annual meeting of the association of life insurance presidents in new york city, on december 4, igig a national question Among the important questions before the country today is this "What is the best way for the American people to create and maintain an efficient transportation machine ?" Safe, adequate and satisfactory transportation must be furnished to the American people either by private owners as a business enter¬ prise under suitable Governmental regulation and protection, or be furnished by the Government itself. public sentiment The public seem to have settled in their own minds that they prefer to have the transportation furnished by the owners rather than under Governmental control or Government ownership. The Association of Railway Executives recently sent out a ques¬ tionnaire to some 6,000 editors throughout the country asking them to express their opinion about Government ownership and control. Eighty-three per cent, answered that their communities were in favor of the return of the roads to the owners. Most of the bills introduced into Congress reflect this sentiment with varying degrees of Governmental regulation and protection. policyholders interested Those who are interested in life insurance, both the insurers and the insured, are vitally interested in the proper answer of the ques¬ tion. In 1918 there were 53,923,734 life insurance policies in force i with the legal reserve companies. Among the assets securing these policies are nearly $1,700,000,000 of railway securities, 26.25^ of the total assets, and a failure to protect these securities affects directly the holders of these policies and the beneficiaries thereof. CONTINUOUS DEVELOPMENT NECESSARY In addition, these policyholders, in common with the balance of the 105,000,000 people in the country, need continuous development of the transportation machine for the purpose of increasing the food and fuel supply and the production of those articles that are neces¬ sary for clothing, shelter, and oUr modern American life. If this is not done, the standard of living must decline and the cost of living, instead of being reduced, will be increased. This general development will be checked if the transportation machine of the country is not sufficient and adequate. Even to-day, in the months of heaviest business, it is doing about all it can and there is a very small margin of safety. WHAT IS THE TEANSPOETATION MACHINE? In order to consider the question the salient facts about the trans¬ portation machine must be given—its growth during the last 19 years, what it represents in the property of the nation, the work that it does for the people, and what should be done to keep it effi¬ cient for future needs. The transportation machine consists of 260,000 miles of railroad, and about 404,000 miles of track : in 1900 there were 192,560 miles of railroad and 258,784 miels of track, an increase since then of 67,440 and 145,220 miles. Over these tracks are operated about 66,000 engines, nearly 2,400,000 freight cars and about 56,000 pas¬ senger train cars—an increase of nearly 30,000 locomotives, 1,000,- 000 freight cars and 22,000 passenger train cars since 1900. It is interesting to note here the very slight growth since June 30, 1915, in the number of units of equipment. The number of locomotives is substantially the same as in I9I5> although they are of a heavier type. The number of freight cars is substantially the same, although of larger capacity, and the increase in passenger train cars is only about 1,000. The reason the people have received the transportation they have without more of an increase in units of rolling stock is the increased efficiency developed in handling the equipment. While there is always a chance to improve methods, further in¬ creases in efficiency in the use of equipment will be obtained slowly ; 2 and because the increase in the capacity of the machine has not been as great or as constant as it should be during the last five years, the country now is face to face with a most urgent need of immediate expansion in order to make up for lost time. WHO OPERATES IT? This great transportation machine is maintained and operated by an industrial army of nearly 2,000,000, earning an average in 1918 of $1,418 a year. ' In 1900 there were about 1,000,000 em¬ ployes, earning an average of $567 a year. VALUE, CAPITAL AND OWNERSHIP The total book value of the machine in 1918 was about $19,000,- 000,000, or nearly $79,000 per mile of road. The capital representing this great machine in the hands of the public at the end of 1917 was about $16,500,000,000, or $66,700 per mile of road. There have been some additions during 1918 and 1919, the complete figures for which are not now available. The stocks and bonds of American railroad companies are in the hands of the public—are owned by insurance companies, savings banks, guardians, trustees, and by hundreds of thousands of indi¬ vidual investors, representing every trade and calling. The once more or less prevalent idea that the railroads are owned by a few great financiers is erroneous. Everybody knows that the securities of our railroads are scattered all over the country—an investment of the people. The Bureau of Railway Economics, in a recent statement, announced that the ownership equities of American rail¬ roads are really in the hands of more than 50,000,000 people. For example, the stock outstanding at the end of 1917 was $9,045,000,000, held by 647,689 stockholders, with an average hold¬ ing of $13,966. No accurate figures as to the number of bond¬ holders are available, but it is thought that there are more bond¬ holders than stockholders, so that there are at least 1,250,000 owners of this great machine. Accurate figures can be given for a number of important com¬ panies showing the wide distribution of the stock and the relatively small holdings per person. For example : The Pennsylvania Railroad in 1910 had 63,298 stockholders, and the average holdings were $6,515.29. In 1918 it had 106,911 stock¬ holders, and the average holdings were $4,669.91. The Northern Pacific in 1910 had 10,551 stockholders, and the average holdings were $23,499.76. In 1918 it had 27,338 stock¬ holders, and the average holdings were $9,071.56. 3 The New Haven in 1910 had 16,258 stockholders, and the average holdings were $8,850.64. In 1918 it had 25,026 stockholders, and the average holdings were $6,278.18. The Atchison in 1910 had 26,399 stockholders, and the average holdings were $10,594.80. In 1918 it had 49,905 stockholders, and the average holdings were $6,932.35. TRANSPORTATION FURNISHED THE PUBLIC This great transportation machine, owned by more than 1,000,000 people, and managed and operated by nearly 2,000,000 people, is furnishing freight and passenger transportation to the public in very large quantities and the growth from 1900 has been phenomenal. The population of the country in 1900 is given at 75,994,575, in 1910 at 91,972,266, and in 1918 105,118,467. The units for measuring transportation are the tons of freight hauled i mile, and the passengers moved i mile. In 1900, for every person in the country, the railroads handled 1,863 of freight I mile, and furnished passenger transportation equivalent to 211 miles. This had increased in 1910 to 2,773 fons of freight i mile and 352 miles of travel for the 92,000,000 population. In 1918 the activities of 105,000,000 people in serving this country and the world made it necessary for the transportation machine to provide trans¬ portation of 3,871 tons of freight moved i mile and a trip of 411 miles for everyone in the country. This freight service is ec[uivalent to hauling every day in the year for each man, woman and child in the country, 21,000 pounds of freight I mile. The increase in freight transportation furnished to each person in this country is 100^ since 1900, and nearly 40% since 1910. In the last 8 years the population of 92,000,000 increased 13,150,000, or 15%, but the consumption of transportation increased much more rapidly. In another 8 or 10 years the population of 105,000,000 will no doubt increase 20,000,000, and if the country is to maintain the present standards of living and participate in the world trade for which the merchant marine has been developed, the freight consumption per person should be not less than 4,000 tons per annum, or 500,000,000,000—an increase of at least 25% over the present output, to which must be added an increase in passenger transportation furnished. This cannot be done unless the transportation machine is enlarged very much and can work rapidly, effectively and continuously, without friction, heat and congestion at important points. 4 NEED FOR ADDITIONS, BETTERMENTS AND EQUIPMENT From 1912 to 1917 there was spent for new lines and extensions, additions and betterments to existing property, and for additional equipment, an average of about $450,000,000 a year, based on the then prices for material and wages. Today these facilities would cost much more. As already pointed out, there has not been much increase in the number of locomotives, freight train cars, and passenger train cars since 1915, and with the next uplift in business (which no doubt will come, possibly in 1920, and if not then, in 1921) very sub¬ stantial additions to the rolling stock and other facilities must be made if the necessary transportation is to be furnished. Director General Hines put this very well in his letter to Senator Cummins of October 7, 1919, when he said: "In order to keep abreast of the growth of business in this country, it is indispensable that the railroads should continue to spend large sums in the acquisition of new equipment, the enlargement and unification of terminals and the construction of additional and the enlargement of existing shops, engine houses, turn tables, etc., and in the carrying forward of normal programs for the revision of grades, construction of additional main tracks, longer and more numerous passing tracks, etc. "In the year or two prior to the beginning of Federal control this work was largely arrested by the difficulties of securing materials and labor and also by the difficulty of securing new capital. During the 3^ear 1918 this work was largely restricted to things which could be promptly done and which would have a relation to winning the war and also restricted by the scarcity of materials. The result was that comprehensive programs for developing the railroads were largely interrupted. During the calendar year 1919 there has been unavoidably an almost complete stoppage of all these matters because of the prospect of early termination of Federal control and the resulting in¬ disposition on the part of Congress to ma]348,949 628,405,575 5.26 1910 14,560,543,744 799>336>033 5.49 1915 17-421,409.990 691,161,343 3.97 Year ended Dec. 31 1917 18,574,297,873 946,833,853 5.10 1918 *18,948,000,000 *704,064,000 *3.72 *Partially estimated to include returns of Class II and III roads. Balance of income from all sources applicable to interest, dividends and improvements. Year ended Total Railway Per cent on June 30 Capital Amount Capital 1900 $11,491,034,960 $514,328,383 4.48 1905 13-805,258,121 683,895,325 4.95 1910 17,774,426,871 982,773,180 5.53 1915 19-719-893,944 818,972,750 4.15 Year ended Dec. 31 1917 19,764,941,991 1,132,868,882 5.73 1918 *19,869,800,000 *904,366,980 *4.55 *Estimated to include returns of Class II and III roads. 20 HOW THE DOLLAR OF GROSS EARNINGS IS DIVIDED: The Operating Year railway rentals Net ended dollar Material, debit Operating June (total opr. Labor Supplies Taxes balance income 30 rev.) etc. (cents) (cents) (cents) (cents) (cents) (cents) 1900 100.0 38.8 25.8 3-3 a 32.1 1905 100.0 40-3 26.4 3-1 a 30.2 1910 100.0 40.7 26.2 3-7 1.0 28.4 1915 100.0 43-1 27.2 4-7 1.2 23.8 Year ended Dec. 31 1917 100.0 43-3 27.2 S-3 0.9 23-3 1918 100.0 52.5 29.0 3-8 0.6 14.1 a Operating rentals for the years 1900 and 1905 are included in operating expenses. EXPENDITURES IN NEW LINES AND EXTENSIONS AND IN ADDITIONS AND BETTERMENTS, I912 TO I917 : CLASS I AND II ROADS AND THEIR NON-OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES; Investments during year Year In new lines In additions Fiscal and extensions and betterments 1912 .. $205,128,794 $337.737>66O 1913 129,248,519 545.989,342 1914 121,705,678 516,061,290 1915 9,117,141 254,611,955 1916 41,885,894 239.249.206 Calendar 1916 7>335.O64 346,690,506 1917 34,489,465 537.257.058 21 Annual average July i, 1912—December 31, 1917. Investments in new lines and extensions $31,415,235 Investments in additions and betterments (including additional equipment but not replacements) 414,432,057 Miscellaneous expenditures, not classified 1,036,004 Total $446,883,296 nuaieer of wage earners in country : persons of 10 years and upward engaged in gainful occupa- tions: total Year Male Female Total Population 1900 23,753,836 5.319.397 29,073,233 75.994.575 1910 30,091,564 8,075,772 38.167,336 91,972,266 Note : These are the only figures available for the period 1900 to 1918. They are taken from the Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1918, Department of Commerce. savings bank deposits: Amount of deposits Year in savings banks 1900 $2,449,547,885 1905 3,261,236,119 1910 4,070,486,246 1915 4,997,706,013 1917 5,418,022,274 1918 5,471,579,948 Source : Report of the Comptroller of the Currency, 1918, page 97. 22 LIBERTY BONDS SUBSCRIBED FOR: From Bulletin of the Secretary of the Treasury, October 21, 1919. Outstanding Original issue Retired, net June 30, 1919 First Liberty Loan 334% Bonds of 1932-47 $1.989,455.550 $579.383.950 $1,410,071,600 First Liberty Loan converted 4% Bonds of 1932-47 568,318,450 400,525,700 167,792,750 First Liberty Loan converted 4 % Bonds of 1932-47 405,443,150 2,003,050 403,440,100 First Liberty Loan Second Conv. aVa^o Bonds of 1932-47 3.492,050 3.492.050 Second Liberty Loan AJo Bonds of 1927-42 3,807,864,200 3,103,659,850 704,204,350 Second Liberty Loan Conv. 434% Bonds of 1927-42 3,034,609,850 172,357,600 2,862,252,250 Third Liberty Loan 434% Bonds of 1928 4,175,148,700 216,596,000 3,958,552,700 Fourth Liberty Loan 434% Bonds of 1933-38 6,958,481,700 165,000,000 6,793,481,700 Victory Liberty Loan 434% Notes of 1922-23 2,414,243,550 2,414,243,550 Victory Liberty Loan 334% Notes of 1922-23 408,986,150 408,986,150 $23,766,043,350 $4,639,526,150 $19,126,517,200 23 number of roads eeeorting to the interstate commerce com¬ mission each year i9ii to i916 by classes: Class of Road 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 Class I 175 171 176 176 172 180 Class II .... -245 260 272 276 272 268 Class III .... 446 407 402 419 418 425 Total .... 866 838 850 871 862 873 Lessor .... 461 449 454 463 448 451 Total .... 1,327 1,287 1,304 L334 1,310 1,324 "C" roads .... 512 S18 455 506 489 430 "U" roads 99 126 153 80 78 91 Total .... 1,938 L93I 1,912 1,920 M 00 1,845 "P" roads .... 241 246 215 199 193 179 Total .... 2,179 2,177 2,127 2,119 2,070 2,024 Explanation of Classes Class I—Roads having annual operating revenues above $1,000,000. Class II—Roads having annual operating revenues between $100,000 and $1,000,000. Class III—Roads having annual operating revenues of less than $100,000. Lessor Companies—Roads whose operations are included in those of Class I, II, and III roads. "C" roads—Operating or non-operating roads for which brief cir¬ culars showing date of incorporation, mileage, etc., were filed. "U" roads—Roads for which official returns were not secured. "P" roads—Roads for which separate reports were not filed, opera¬ tions are included in Class I, II, and III roads. 24 INVESTMENT IN ROAD AND EQUIPMENT CLASS I AND II ROADS AND THEIR NON-OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES 1913 to 1917 Item Fiscal, 1913 Fiscal, 1914 Fiscal, 1915 Fiscal, igi6 Calendar, 1916 Calendar, 1917 Mileage represented (at begin¬ ning of year) 229,902.66 233,759-66 236,556.43 238,162.14 a 233,581.03 Mileage represented (at end of 239,120.61 year) 235,456.23 235,985.60 237,272.11 239,392.31 233,517.05 Property investment (at begin¬ ning of 3'ear) $15,874,579,626 $16,424,359,514 $16,983,946,107 $17,267,119,423 $17,349,632,708 $17,678,316,078 Property- investment (at end of year) 16,351,639,266 16,936,697,840 17,247,101,881 17,525,576,908 17,681,126,339 18,423,235,159 Increase during year 477,059,640 512,338,326 263,155,774 258,457,485 331,493,631 744,919,081 Investment during year ; In new lines and extensions.. 49,752,948 33,601,433 9,117,141 41,885,894 7,335,064 34,489,465 In additions and betterments.. 545,989,342 516,061,290 254,611,955 239,249,206 346,690,506 537,257,058 Miscellaneous charges not classified 4,847,012 851,068 Total investment during year 600,589,302 550,513,731 263,729,096 281,135,100 354,025,570 571,746,523 Net book ■ adjustments b Cr. 123,529,662 Cr. 38,175,405 Cr. 573,322 Cr. 22,677,615 Cr. 22,531,939 173,172,558 Total increase in invest¬ ment 477,059,640 512,338,326 263,155,774 258,457,485 331,493,631 744,919,081 July I, 1912, to Dec. 31, 1917. Annual : average Investments in new lines and extensions $ 31,415,735 Investments in additions and betterments 414,432,057 Miscellaneous charges not classified 1,036,004 Total average investment 446,883,796 Net book adjustments Cr. 4,342,791 Total average increase in investment 442,541,005 a Data not available, h Book adjustments and difference between record value of grantor and purchase price of grantee in cases of roads sold, merged, consolidated, etc., during year. Note: Annual average computed by adding data for fiscal years 1913, 1914, 1915, 1916, calendar year 1917, and 53.71% of calendar year 1916, and then dividing this total by The 53.71% represents approximately the amount of investments made in last half of the calendar year 1916. INVESTMENT OF AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES IN RAILROAD SECURITIES, 1904-1919: Per cent of total assets Number of all Per cent of American Railroad Securities Owned of assets Date com¬ panies report¬ companies which the assets of invested in railroad ing tabulated companies represent Stocks Bonds Total securi¬ ties Dec. 31 1904 63 99-59 $45,681,426 $750,668^349. $796,349,774 31-99 1907 14 66.67 a a 866,304,598 42.55 ign 39 93.03 a a 1,336,657,217 34-44 1914 36 92.8s a a 1,514,084,128 33-04 1917 33 89.92 a a 1,740,570,237 32-58 1918 60 94.14 39.652,730 1,662,257,230 1,701,909,960 27.69 July 31 1919 60 94.14 36,708,802 1,655,589,973 1,692,298,775 *26.25 o Data not available * Estimated NOTE: It will be noticed that total amount of railroad securities owned has been increasing, but from the last column of the tabulation it will also be noticed that percentage of investment in railroad securities as com¬ pared with total assets of the companies has steadily decreased since 1907, Percentage for 1907 is probably a little higher than it would have been had data for more companies been available. Comparable condition for 1907 can be arrived at very closely by adding to the fourteen companies reporting in 1907, the amount held by the twenty-five additional companies reporting in 1911, decreasing the 1911 holdings by the same ratio that the fourteen com¬ panies changed during 1907 to 1911. On this basis the holdings of thirty- nine companies for 1907, whose total assets amounted to 91.61% of all com¬ panies, amounted to $1,100,000,000 and their railroad securities owned amounted to about 37.92% of all assets. GENERAL DISCUSSION Hon. W. a. Day, President, Equitable Life Assurance Society, New York: Mr. Chairman, if it is not an embarrassing question, I should like to ask Mr. Elliott to state to the Association a concrete formula that we can work to as an adequate remedy for the situation. The Chairman (Mr. W. W. McClench, President, Massa¬ chusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co., Springfield, Mass.) : Judge Day asks Mr. Elliott to answer a real question. Judge Day: formula. Mr. Elliott asks our help. i should like a concrete 26 The Chairman: A concrete formula by which life insurance presidents can work. Mr. Elliott : I could not answer that without sending you a written communication. I can do that, however, with a great deal of pleasure. There have 'been some twenty or thirty plans sub¬ mitted to the Congress and, as you probably know, two major plans, the one known as the plan of the Association of Railway Executives, and the other known generally as the Warfield plan. I have been trying my best for three or four months to get the Warfield people and the Railway Executive people together in order to get a plan so that—now that we are approaching the time when the bill should be passed—we will have a plan that will represent the views of all of those who see the seriousness of the situation, and I still hope that that can be done. It would be very difficult for me to state at this meeting, any more than I have done in that paper, just how legislation should be framed. I have outlined in the paper the things that must be pro¬ tected in the legislation, but, if your Association desires, I will give you a paper that will give you our views. The Chairman: Any other question? We have now reached that part in our program headed, "General Discussion." I assume, therefore, the meeting is open, and I am quite sure Mr. Elliott will answer any other questions which are put to him in reference to this important matter. Are there any general suggestions? I do not know whether, Mr. Elliott, you answered a question which I have had in mind for some time : whether without a specific direction from Congress to the Interstate Commission in reference to the rates, the so-called weak roads can survive. Mr. Elliott: I do not believe all of them can. All of the dif¬ ferent plans provide for a specific mandate to the regulating power, whatever it may be, that rates shall produce sufficient revenue to pay the necessary wages, all other necessary expenses, necessary taxes, and a fair return upon the fair value of the property. When the Esch Bill got on to the floor of the House, the committee report had a mandate in it as to the rates, but the House itself took that mandate out and left the bill as to the rate situation in practically the same condition as it is today, leaving it entirely to the discretion of the Interstate Commerce Commission that the rate should be reasonable. 27 The Cummins Bill provides that the roads in given groups of territories shall have rates fixed by the Interstate Commerce Commission, so that they shall produce sufficient revenue to pay of the fair value of the property, plus one-half of i% in the discretion of the Commission, for maintenance, in case main¬ tenance was not adequate, and if they should earn above 6%, the excess up to 7% is to be divided, one-half going to the owning company and one-half to a fund within the control of the Govern¬ ment. Now, people have differed as to the wisdom of that provision, on the theory that if you take away the hope of profit, you check incentive and check initiative and it will cost the country more in the long run for their transportation, because no one will try very hard to earn more than the 6^. They will be extravagant, perhaps, in operation ; they will not be careful, and that is one of the points of difference between the so-called Warfield plan and the so-called Executives' plan. There is something to be said on each side. If we can get a basis of rates that will produce 6fo on the value of all of the railroads in a given group, it does not mean that every railroad will earn 6fo, because some cannot, but it gives a basis that will help to protect the weaker roads. The railroad executives, however, fear that if you adopt the theory as above outlined, when you get into the Con¬ gress, they will do what the House of Representatives did—either eliminate the provision entirely or reduce the proposed 5/^% rate of return to 45b or or 4;>4% on the theory that no figure should be named higher than the rate for Liberty Bonds ; also that any specific rate named in the act would gradually come to be con¬ sidered a maximum as well as a minimum, and that such low rate would weaken every railroad security in the country, hurt the credit of the roads so that new money could not be obtained and the transportation machine would not grow as the country grows. That is the chief difference between the so-called railway executive plan and the Warfield plan, and it is now being debated in the Senate as to whether that is the right thing to do or not. If everyone in this room knew that the roads would receive SVifo or 6% of the value of all the properties in a certain region, and it would continue, I think we would all be very happy, but you do not know that you can get it, and that subject has to be threshed out in the Conference Committee and on the floor of the House and Senate. In each of the two bills there is a mandate 28 that the roads must have rates sufficient to produce a fair return. This is mentioned in actual figures in the Warfield bill, and is in¬ dicated in the railway executives' bill by saying the rates must be adequate to pay wages, costs of materials, taxes, a fair return on the value of the property and enough to restore the credit of the- roads and make the public feel that the business, as a going business, is a safe one. In the railroad bill no specific figures are named because conditions change and the rate of return needed fluctuates from time to time. Today may be too low, but ten years from now it may be too high. So we felt (we may be wrong) that if a formula, as I have just recited, is produced that will allow that level to fluctuate from time to time, as is provided in our bill, it will be much better. We have provided in our bill for a new body known as "The Board of Transportation," which shall be charged with some of the duties that the Commission i.ow have, and also with the duty of con¬ stantly surveying the whole transportation situation in the United States and the credit situation. Calculating from time to time how much revenue these railroads must have, not for the sake of the owners, but for the sake of the country, so that the railroads will grow sufficiently, and when that was stated, then it was the duty of the Commission, under our proposed plan, to let the rate be high enough to produce the figure which this new body said was necessary so that these transportation machines may be maintained, and keep on growing for the benefit of the whole country. That Board of Transportation was eliminated in the House Bill and everything is put in the hands of the Interstate Commerce Commission, as now, without any special instruction as to rates. We have had that law since 1887, but the pressure on the Com¬ mission has been so great that the "fair and reasonable" rate, as it is today, is not enough to keep the machine up to the mark, and capital has gradually been seeking other fields. Therefore, if the public want, as they seem to want, this machine to run in the best possible way, they must in some way impress upon the regu¬ lating authority that there must be enough revenue produced so that the machine can be supported and increased day by day, and year by year; if not, we will surely stop the growth of the country. 29