w a - ** • l ' * • <** cr v-v *b? VVT* A v >; %>•;• \, *y titer \ vv % *W : a^ .'■'*» <^a Cr - • " • - * a& ^. **T?T % ' /v ^ A * v, v W * Jr ^ % ^.'+4 4 o • * * A <* *° • » * a^» y* COLONEL HENRY LUDINGTON a flDemoir BY WILLIS FLETCHER JOHNSON A.M., L.H.D. I WITH PORTRAITS, VIEWS, FACSIMILES, ETC. PRINTED BY HIS GRANDCHILDREN LAVINIA ELIZABETH LUDINGTON AND CHARLES HENRY LUDINGTON NEW YORK 1907 LIBRARY of CONGRESS Two Copies Received SEP ** 1907 fc Copyright Entry classJA 'xxc. n6, COPY A. - Copyright, 1907, by Lavinia Elizabeth Ludington and Charles Henry Ludington CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE PREFACE vii I GENEALOGICAL 3 II BEFORE THE REVOLUTION 24 III THE BEGINNING OF THE REVOLUTION ... 47 IV THE REVOLUTION 77 V SECRET SERVICE 114 VI BETWEEN THE LINES 133 VII AFTER THE WAR 191 VIII SOME LATER GENERATIONS 215 INDEX 230 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Grist mill at Fredericksburgh, now Kent (Ludingtonville post- office), built by Col. Henry Ludington about the time of the Revolution Frontispiece Old gun used by Henry Ludington in the French and Indian War 29 FACING PAGE Henry Ludington's commission, from Governor Tryon, as captain in Col. Beverly Robinson's regiment 30 Old Phillipse Manor House at Carmel, N. Y., in 1846 36 View of Carmel, N. Y 38 Map of Quaker Hill and vicinity, 1778-80, showing location of Colonel Ludington's place at Fredericksburgh 50 Letter from Committee on Conspiracies to Colonel Ludington . . 56 Order of arrest from Committee on Conspiracies to Colonel Lud- ington 58 Maps of Phillipse patent, showing original divisions and territory covered by Colonel Ludington's regiment 60 Henry Ludington's commission as colonel from Provincial Con- gress, 1776 70 Henry Ludington's commission as colonel from State of New York, 1778 72 Letter from Abraham B. Bancker to Colonel Ludington about militia 74 View of highroad and plains from site of Colonel Ludington's house 90 Facsimile of Colonel Ludington's signature 102 Letter from Col. Nathaniel Sackett to Colonel Ludington on secret service 114 v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS FACING PAGE Home of the late George Ludington on site of Colonel Luding- ton's house 132 Home of the late Frederick Ludington, son of Colonel Ludington, at Kent 134 Mahogany table used by Colonel Ludington, at which, according to family tradition, Washington and Rochambeau dined .... 165 Letter from Governor Clinton to Colonel Ludington about militia 170 Pay certificate of a member of Colonel Ludington's regiment . . 188 Colonel Ludington's tombstone at Patterson, formerly part of Fredericksburgh, N. Y 208 Portrait of Frederick Ludington, son of Colonel Ludington . . 216 Portrait of Gov. Harrison Ludington, grandson of Col. Ludington 218 Old store at Kent, built by Frederick and Lewis Ludington about 1808 220 Home of the late Lewis Ludington, son of Colonel Ludington, at Carmel 222 Portrait of Lewis Ludington, son of Colonel Ludington .... 224 Portrait of Charles Henry Ludington, grandson of Colonel Lud- ington 226 PREFACE The part performed by the militia and militia offi- cers in the War of the Revolution does not seem al- ways to have received the historical recognition which it deserves. It was really of great importance, espe- cially in southern New England and the Middle States, at times actually rivaling and often indis- pensably supplementing that of the regular Conti- nental Army. It will not be invidious to say that of all the militia none was of more importance or ren- dered more valuable services than those regiments which occupied the disputed border country between the American and British lines, and which guarded the bases of supplies and the routes of communica- tion. There was probably no region in which border- land friction was more severe and intrigues more sinister than that which lay between the British in New York City and the Americans at the High- lands of the Hudson, nor was there a highway of travel and communication more important than that which led from Hartford in Connecticut to Fishkill and West Point in New York. It is the purpose of the present volume to present the salient features of the public career of a militia colonel who was perhaps most of all concerned in holding that troublous territory for the American PREFACE cause, in guarding that route of travel and supply, and in serving the government of the State of New York, to whose seat his territorial command was so immediately adjacent. It is intended to be merely a memoir of Henry Ludington, together with such a historical setting as may seem desirable for a just understanding of the circumstances of his life and its varied activities. It makes no pretense of giving a complete genealogy of the Ludington family in America, either before or after his time, but con- fines itself to his own direct descent and a few of his immediate descendants. The facts of his life, never before compiled, have been gleaned from many sources, including Colonial, Revolutionary and State records, newspaper files, histories and diaries, correspondence, various miscellaneous manuscript collections, and some oral traditions of whose authen- ticity there is substantial evidence. The most copious and important data have been secured from the manuscript collections of two of Henry Ludington's descendants, Mr. Lewis S. Patrick, of Marinette, Wisconsin, who has devoted much time and pains- taking labor to the work of searching for and secur- ing authentic information of his distinguished an- cestor, and Mr. Charles Henry Ludington, of New York, who has received many valuable papers and original documents and records from a descendant of Sibyl Ludington Ogden, Henry Ludington's first-born child. It is much regretted that among all these data, no portrait of Henry Ludington PREFACE is in existence, and that therefore none can be given in this book. In addition, the old records of Charlestown and Maiden, Massachu- setts, and of Branford, East Haven and New Haven, Connecticut, the collections of the Connec- ticut Historical Society, the early annals of New York, especially in the French and Indian and the Revolutionary wars, and the publications of the New England Genealogical Society, have also been util- ized, together with the Papers of Governor George Clinton, Lossing's "Field Book of the Revolution," Blake's and Pelletreau's histories of Putnam County, Smith's "History of Dutchess County," Bolton's "History of Westchester County," and other works, credit to which is given in the text of this volume. It is hoped that this brief and simple setting forth of the public services of Henry Ludington during the formative period of our country's history will prove of sufficient interest to the members of his family and to others to justify the printing of this memoir. HENRY LUDINGTON H flDemoir CHAPTER I GENEALOGICAL THIS family of the Ludingtons," says Gray in his genealogical work on the nobility and gentry of England, "were of a great estate, of whom there was one took a large travail to the seeing of many countries where Our Saviour wrought His miracles, as is declared by his monument in the Col- lege of Worcester, where he is interred." The im- mediate reference of the quaint old chronicler was to the Ludingtons of Shrawley and Worcester, and the one member of that family whom he singled out for special mention was Robert Ludington, gentleman, a merchant in the Levantine trade. In the pursuit of business, and also probably for curiosity and pleas- ure, he traveled extensively in Italy, Greece, Turkey, Egypt and Syria, at a time when such journeyings were more arduous and even perilous than those of to-day in equatorial or polar wildernesses. In accord with the pious custom of the age he also made a pil- grimage to Palestine, and visited the chief places made memorable in Holy Writ. He died at Worces- ter at the age of 76 years, in 1625, a few years before the first colonists of his name appeared in North America. The exact degree of relationship between HENRY LUDINGTON him and them is not now ascertainable, but it is sup- posable that it was close, while there is no reason whatever for doubting that the American Luding- tons were members of that same family "of a great estate," whether or not they came from the particular branch of it which was identified with Shrawley and Worcester. For the Ludington family in England antedated Robert Ludington of Worcester by many genera- tions, and was established elsewhere in the Midlands than in Worcestershire. Its chief seat seems to have been in the Eastern Midlands, though its name has long been implanted on all the shires from Lincoln to Worcester, including Rutland, Leicester, Hunt- ingdon, Northampton, and Warwick. There is a credible tradition that in the Third Crusade a Lud- ington was among the followers of Richard Coeur de Lion, and that afterward, when that adventurous monarch was a prisoner in Austria, he sought to visit him in the guise of a holy palmer, in order to devise with him some plan for his escape. Because of these loyal exploits, we are told, he was invested with a patent of nobility, and with the coat of arms there- after borne by the Ludington family, to wit ( accord- ing to Burke's Heraldry) : Pale of six argent and azure on a chief, gules a lion passant and gardant. Crest, a palmer's staff, erect. Motto, Probum non penitet. Authentic mention of other Ludingtons, honor- able and often distinguished, may be found from [4] GENEALOGICAL time to time in English history, especially in the an- nals of Tudor and Stuart reigns. In the reign of Henry VIII a Sir John Ludington was a man of mark in the north of England, and his daughter, Elizabeth Ludington, married first an alderman of the City of London, and second, after his death, Sir John Chamberlain. In the sixteenth century, the Rev. Thomas Ludington, M.A., was a Fellow of Christ Church College, Oxford, where his will, dated May 28, 1593, is still preserved. In the next century another clergyman, the Rev. Stephen Ludington, D.D., was married about 1610 to Anne, daughter of Richard Streetfield, at Chiddington, Kent. After- ward he was made prebendary of Langford, Lin- coln, on November 15, 1641, and in June, 1674, re- signed that place to his son, the Rev. Stephen Lud- ington, M.A. He was also rector of Carlton Scrope, and archdeacon of Stow, filling the last-named place at the time of his death in 1677. His grave is to be seen in Lincoln Cathedral. His son, mentioned above, was married to Ann Dillingham in Westmin- ster Abbey in 1675. It will be hereafter observed in this narrative that the family name of Ludington has been variously spelled in this country, as Ludington, Luddington, Ludinton, Ludenton, etc. Some of these variations have appeared also in England, together with the form Lydington, which has not been used here. These same forms have also been applied to the sev- eral towns and parishes which bear or have borne the C5] HENRY LUDINGTON family name, and especially that one parish which is so ancient and which was formerly so closely identi- fied with the Ludingtons that question has risen whether the parish was named for the family or the family derived its name from the parish. This place, at one time called Lydington, was first mentioned in the Domesday Book of William the Conqueror, where it was called Ludington — whence we may properly regard that as the original and correct form of the name. It was then a part of the Bishopric of Lincoln and of the county of Northampton; Rut- landshire, in which the place now is, not having been set off from Northampton until the time of King John. The Bishop of Lincoln had a residential palace there, which was afterward transformed into a charity hospital, and as such is still in existence. In the chapel of the hospital is an ancient folio Bible bearing the inscription "Ludington Hospital Bible," and containing in manuscript a special prayer for the hospital, which is regularly read as a part of the service. The name of Loddington is borne by par- ishes in Leicestershire and Northamptonshire, that of Luddington by parishes in Lincolnshire and War- wickshire (the latter near Stratford-on-Avon and in- timately associated with Shakespeare), and that of Luddington-in-the-Brook by one which is partly in Northamptonshire and partly in Huntingdonshire; all testifying to the early extent of the Ludington family throughout the Midland counties of England. The earliest record of a Ludington in America oc- 161 GENEALOGICAL curs in 1635. On April 6 of that year the ship Hope- well, which had already made several voyages to these shores, sailed from London for Massachusetts Bay, under the command of William Bundock. Her com- pany of eleven passengers was notable for the youth- fulness of all its members, the youngest being twelve and the oldest only twenty-two years of age. Seven of them were young men, or boys, and four were girls. One of the latter, whose age was given as eighteen years, was registered on the ship's list as "Christiom" Ludington, but other records, in Lon- don, show that the name, although very distinctly written in that form, should have been "Christian." Concerning her origin and her subsequent fate, all records are silent. In John Farmer's "List of An- cient Names in Boston and Vicinity, 1630-1644," however, appears the name of "Ch. Luddington"; presumably that of this same young woman. Again, in the Old Granary burying ground in Boston, on Tomb No. 108, there appear the names of Joseph Tilden and C. Ludington; and a plausible conjec- ture is that Christian Ludington became the wife of Joseph Tilden and that thus they were both buried in the same grave. But this is conjecture and nothing more. So far as ascertained facts are concerned, Christian Ludington makes both her first and her last recorded appearance in that passenger list of the Hopewell. The next appearance of the name in American annals, however, — passing by the mere undated men- m HENRY LUDINGTON tion of one Christopher Ludington in connection with the Virginia colony, — places us upon assured ground and marks the foundation of the family in America. William Ludington was born in England — place not known — in 1608, and his wife Ellen — her family name not known — was also born there in 1617- They were married in 1636, and a few years later came to America and settled in the Massachu- setts Bay colony, in that part of Charlestown which was afterward set off into the separate town of Mai- den. The date of their migration hither is not prec- isely known. Savage's "Genealogical Register" mentions William Ludington as living in Charles- town in 1642; which is quite correct, though, as Mr. Patrick aptly points out, the date is by no means con- clusive as to the time of his first settlement in that place. Indeed, it is certain that he had settled in Charlestown some time before, for in the early re- cords of the colony, under date of May 13, 1640, ap- pears the repeal of a former order forbidding the erection of houses at a distance of more than half a mile from the meeting house, and with the repeal is an order remitting to William Ludington the penalty for having disobeyed the original decree. That restriction of building was, of course, a prudent and probably a necessary one, in the early days of the colony, for keeping the town compact and thus af- fording to all its inhabitants greater security against Indian attacks. It seems to have been disregarded, however, by the actual building of some houses out- GENEALOGICAL side of the prescribed line, and in such violation a heavy penalty was incurred. By 1640 the law be- came obsolete. Boston had then been founded ten years. The colonies of New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Connecticut had been settled and organ- ized. And three years before the Pequods had been vanquished. It was therefore fitting to rescind the order, and to let the borders of Charlestown be en- larged. We may assume that it was with a realiza- tion that this would speedily be done that William Ludington, either at the very beginning of 1640 or previous to that year, built his house on the for- bidden ground, and thus incurred the penalty, which, however, was not imposed upon him; and we may further assume that it was this act of his which finally called official attention to the obsolete character of the law and thus brought about its repeal. In the light thus thrown upon him, William Ludington ap- pears as probably a man of considerable standing in the community, and of high general esteem, else his disregard of the law would scarcely have been thus condoned. Reckoning, then, that William Ludington was settled in his house in the outskirts of Charlestown — on the north side of the Mystic River, in what was later called Maiden — before May 13, 1640, the date of his arrival in America must probably be placed as early as 1639, if not even earlier. He remained at Charlestown for a little more than twenty years, and was a considerable landowner and an important HENRY LUDINGTON member of the community. Many references to him appear in the old colonial records, with some appar- ent conflicts of date, which are doubtless due to the transition stage through which the calendar was then passing. Most of the civilized world adopted the present Gregorian calendar in the sixteenth century, but it was not until 1751 that Great Britain and the British colonies did so. Consequently during most of our colonial history, including the times of William Ludington, the year began on March 25 instead of January 1, and all dates in the three months of Jan- uary, February and March (down to the 24th) were credited to a different year from that to which we should now credit them. In many cases historians have endeavored to indicate such dates with accuracy by giving the numbers of both years, thus: March 1, 1660-61. But in many cases this has not been done and only a single year number is given, thus causing much uncertainty and doubt as to which year is meant. There were also other disturbances of chro- nology, and other differences in the statement of dates, involving other months of the year ; especially that of two months' difference at what is now the end of the year. Thus the birth of William Ludington's daughter Mary is variously stated to have occurred on December 6, 1642, December 6, 1642-43, Feb- ruary 6, 1643, and February 6, 1642-43. Also the birth and death of his son Matthew are credited, respectively, to October 16, 1657, and November 12, 1657, and to December 16, 1657, and January 12, Ciol GENEALOGICAL 1658. There is record of the purchase, on October 10, 1649, of a tract of twenty acres of land at Mai- den, by William Ludington, described in the deed as a weaver, from Ralph Hall, a pipe-stave maker, and also of the sale of five acres by William Ludington to Joseph Carter, a currier. The deed given by Ralph Hall is entitled "A Sale of Land by Ralph Hall unto William Luddington, both of Charlestowne, the 10th day of the 10th moneth, 1649," and runs as follows : Know all men by these presents, That I, Ralph Hall, of Charletowne in New England, Pipe stave maker, for a certaine valluable considera- tion by mee in hand Received, by which I doe acknowledge myselfe to be fully satisfied, and payed, and contented; Have bargained, sould, given, and granted, and doe by these presents Bargaine, sell, give, and grant unto william Lud- dington of Charletowne aforesayd, Weaver, Twenty Achors of Land, more or less, scituate, Lying, and Beeing in Maulden, That is to say, fifteen Acres of Land, more or less which I, the sayd Ralph formerly purchased at the hand of Thomas Peirce, of Charltowne, senior, Bounded on the Northwest by the land of Mr. Palgrave, Phisition, on the Northeast by the Lands of John Sybly, on the South Easte by the Lands of James Hubbert, and on the South west by the Land of widdow Coale, And the other five Acres herein mencioned sould to the sayd William, Are five Acres, more, or less, bounded on the south- east by the Land of Widdow Coale aforesaid, on HENRY LUDINGTON the southwest by Thomas Grover and Thomas Osborne, Northeast by the Ground of Thomas Molton, and Northwest by the forsayde flfeteen Acres: which five acres I formerly purchased of Mr. John Hodges, of Charltowne. To Have and to hould the sayd fifeteen acres, and five Acres of Lands, with all the Appurtenances and priviledges thereoff To Him, the sayd Wil- liam Luddington his heigres and Assignees for ever: And by mee, the sayd Ralph Hall, and Mary my wife, to bee bargained sould, given, and confirmed unto him, the sayd william, and his heigres and assignes for him, and them peasable and quietly to possess, inioy, and improve to his and their owne proper use and usses for ever, and the same by us by vertue hereoff to bee war- rantedtised (sic) mayntained, and defended from any other person or persons hereafter Lay- ing clayme to the same by any former contract or agreement concerning the same: In witness whereof, I, the sayd Ralph Hall with Mary my wife, for our selves, our heires, executors and Ad- ministrators, have hereunto sett our hands and seales. Dated this Tenth day of December 1649. This is testified before the worshipfull Mr. Richard Bellingham. On November 30, 1651, William Ludington was mentioned in the will of Henry Sandyes, of Charles- town, as one of the creditors of his estate, and in 1660 he was enrolled as a juror in Maiden. Early in the latter year, however, he removed from Maiden or Charlestown to the New Haven, Connecticut, col- [12] GENEALOGICAL ony, and there settled at East Haven, adjoining Branford, on the east side of the Quinnipiac River. Five years before there had been established at that place the first iron works in Connecticut. The raw material used was the rich bog ore which was then found in large quantities in the swamps of North Haven and elsewhere, precisely like that which at a still later date was abundantly found and worked in the swamps of southern New Jersey, where the name of "Furnace" is still borne by more than one village on the site of a long-abandoned foundry. This in- dustry flourished at East Haven until about 1680, when the supply of bog ore was exhausted and the works were closed. Although William Ludington had been a weaver at Maiden, he appears to have been interested in these iron works, and indeed prob- ably removed to East Haven for the sake of connect- ing and identifying himself with them. But his career there was short. On March 27, 1660, evidently soon after his arrival there, he was complainant in a slander suit, and in either the same year or the next year he died, at the East Haven iron works. The manner of his death, whether from sickness or from accident, is unknown. But it evidently produced some impression in the community, since it is the only death specially recorded in the early annals of the place. The precise date of his death, even the year in which it occurred, is a matter of uncertainty. Mr. Patrick quotes a passage from the East Haven rec- C1S3 HENRY LUDINGTON ords which says: "In 1662 John Porter obtained a piece of land to set his blacksmith shop upon . . . and about the same time William Ludington died." Therefore he concludes that William Ludington died in 1662. But was it 1662 according to the chro- nology of those times or according to that of our time? Wyman's records of Charlestown and Mai- den, which mention William Ludington's departure thence for East Haven, relate that on October 1, 1661, John White made petition for the appointment of an administrator of William Ludington's estate in Middlesex County, Massachusetts, and Pope's "Pioneers of Massachusetts" confirms that record, giving the name of the petitioner as Wayte or Waite, and adding that the inventory of the estate was filed by James Barrat, or Barret, on April 1, 1662. Mr. Patrick has the name Bariat and the date February 1, 1662. Here we have, then, the same discrepancy of exactly two months in statement of date which was noticed in the case of Matthew Ludington's birth and death. Of course, if the petition for administra- tion of William Ludington's estate was made on October 1, 1661, his death must have occurred before that date, instead of in 1662 as the East Haven re- cords suggest. The explanation of the apparent conflict of dates is doubtless to be found in the changes of calendar to which reference has been made, one historian giving the date according to the chronology then prevailing and another according to that of the present day. Concerning the date of the C143 GENEALOGICAL probating of his estate at East Haven, however, there is apparently no doubt, since in the records of it the dual year-dates are given. That estate was inven- toried and appraised by John Cooper and Matthew Moulthrop, and their inventory, according to Hoad- ly's "New Haven Colonial Records," was filed in court at New Haven on March 3, 1662, according to the chronology of that time, or 1663 according to ours. This interesting document was entitled "An Inventory of ye Estate of William Ludington, late of New Haven, deceased, amounting to £183 and 10s., upon Oath attested yt ye Aprizents was just to the best of their light, by John Cooper, Sen., and Matthew Moulthrop in Court at New Haven, 1662—63." It ran in detail as follows : lbs sh d. Inv'ty sP bd's, boulsters pillows, coverlits, rugs, cur- tains — value $ sheets, pillow covers, table clothes and a blanket . W five yards % of krosin . . W four yards of red kersey . ^P six yards of kersey . . . $ five yards of serze at 7s . W eight yards blew kersey at 7s $ twelve yards of serge at 6s $ l 3 /4th of wosted yarns . . $ l^th of woolen yarns . . C15H 20 05 02 01 02 01 02 00 00 00 38 07 16 00 00 14 15 16 18 12 05 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 HENRY LUDINGTON lbs sh d. Brought Forward, 38 Inv'ty $ 4 guns, 2 swords and a piece of a sword . . 05 16 00 $ 3 chests and three boxes . 02 00 00 $ pewter, chamber pots, spoons and 2 sauce pans $ 2 dripping pans, 1 cup, 4 cream pots, some eartyn ware . . . . 00 08 02 $ 3 bottles and a tu mill . . 00 02 06 sP warming pan, 2 iron pots, kettle, brass pot 2 skil- lets, frying pan . . j 03 15 00 $ iron dogs, tramell, share and coulter and a iron square 01 $ tooles, wedges, sithes & a payre of still yards & a 71b waight . . . $ a smoothing iron, a parcell of wayles, a hogshead & 2 chests .... $ sheeps wooll and cotton wooli $ Indyan corne, 7lb 10s; 10 bush turnips, 18s . . 08 $ 2 loomes and furniture, 3 chayres 05 ^ wooden ware, a table & forme, a sieve, some trenches & bagges . . 01 09 04 » men GENEALOGICAL lbs sh d 78 60 16 30 185 00 02 183 9 00 06 07 02 15 07 10 1 00 08 00 09 00 09 00 Brought Forward, Inv'ty P house and land 60lbs . . $ 3 cowes & two calves, 2 sowes & 3 shoates . sP 6 loads of hay, 50s, and some other thinges in all The Estate Cr The Estate Dr Which being deducted there remains The marke, i. e. of ) John Cooper, > Apprisers. Mathew Moulthrop, ) Again, in the "Records of the Proprietors of New Haven" we find that "At a Court held at New Haven March 3, 1662-3 ... an inventory of the Estate of Willm. Luddington deceased whas pre- sented . . . The widdow upon oath attested to the fulness of it to the best of her knowledge. . . . The widdow being asked if her husband made noe will answered that she knew of none for she was not at home when he died . . . The matter respecting the childrens portions was deferred till next court & the . . . widdow with him that shee was to marry & all her children above fourteen years of age was ordered then to appear ..." At this date, therefore, Wil- liam Ludington's widow was engaged to be married again, and that engagement was publicly announced. ClT] HENRY LUDINGTON Moreover, she was actually married to her second husband, John Rose, a few weeks later, for on May 5 following, in 1662-63, according to the "Proprietors' Records," the court was again in session, and "John Rose who married widdow Ludington was called to know what security he would give for the childrens portions that was not yet of age to receive them." It is true that in those days the period of mourning be- fore remarriage was sometimes abbreviated, but it is scarcely conceivable that this widow's marriage took place within a few months of her husband's death, or sooner than a year thereafter. It may therefore be assumed that William Ludington's death, at the East Haven iron works, occurred at least as early as March or April, 1661-62. There is reason to believe that William Ludington was not only a man of note in the East Haven com- munity but that also he was a man of considerable property — more than would be suggested by the item of "house and land 60 lbs." in the inventory. For the New Haven Land Records show that in 1723 his son, William Ludington, 2nd, sold to Thomas Robin- son "part of that tract of land set out to my father, William Luddington, which tract contains 100 acres." This property was in East Haven, just across the river from Branford. The children of William and Ellen Ludington were seven in number. The first was Thomas, who was born (probably in England) in 1637. He re- moved to Newark, New Jersey, in 1666, and became [18] GENEALOGICAL a farmer— since when in 1689 he sold some land with a house and barn at New Haven he described himself in the deed as a husbandman. He was an assessor and a surveyor of highways at Newark, and left chil- dren whose descendants are now to be found in the northern part of New Jersey. His oldest child, John, remained at New Haven, married, and had issue, his first-born, James, being a soldier in the French and Indian war and being killed in battle on September 8, 1756. The second child of William and Ellen Ludington was John Ludington, who was born (probably at Charlestown, Massachusetts) in 1640. He was living at East Haven in 1664, and afterward, Mr. Patrick thinks, removed to Vermont. The third child was Mary, of whose birth various dates are given, as already noted. The fourth was Henry Ludington, the date of whose birth is not known, but who was killed in the war with King Philip, at the end of 1675 or beginning of 1676, as appears in the "New Haven Probate Records," where is found an inventory of the estate of "Henry Luddington late of N. haven slayne in the warre taken & apprised by Mathew Moulthrop & John Potter Janry. 3, 1676." The fifth child was Han- nah, the dates of whose birth and death are unknown. The sixth child was William Ludington, 2nd, who was born about 1655 and died in February, 1737. His first wife was Martha Rose, daughter of his step- father, John Rose, and his second was Mercy White- head. According to Dodd's "East Haven Register" C19] HENRY LUDINGTON he was a man of means, of intelligence, of ability, and of important standing in the community. He had two sons and one daughter by his first wife, and two sons and six daughters by his second. His first-born, the son of Martha Rose, was Henry Ludington, who was born in 1679, was a carpenter, married Sarah, daughter of William Collins, on August 20, 1700, had eight sons and four daughters, and died in the summer of 1727 — of whom, or of his descendants, we shall presently hear much more. Finally, the sev- enth child of William and Ellen Ludington was Matthew, who as already related was born at Maiden and died in infancy. Despite the removal of Thomas Ludington to Newark, and that of John Ludington (probably) to Vermont, they appear to have re- tained much interest in the New Haven colony, since in the "Colony Record of Deeds" of Connecticut we find Thomas, John, and William Ludington enum- erated among the proprietors of New Haven in 1685, who were, presumably, the above mentioned first, second, and sixth children of William and Ellen Ludington. Recurring for a moment to the family of William Ludington, 2nd, and passing by for the time his first-born, Henry Ludington, it is to be observed that his second child, Eleanor, married Nathaniel Bailey, of Guilford, Connecticut, and had issue; his third, William Ludington, 3rd, married Anna Hodge, lived at Waterbury and Plymouth, Connec- ticut, and had issue, his sixth son, Samuel, serving in C20H GENEALOGICAL the French and Indian war, and his grandson, Tim- othy, son of William 3rd's first-born, Matthew, alsa serving in that war and being killed in battle at East Haven in the War of the Revolution; the fourth, Mercy, married Ebenezer Deanes or Dains, of Nor- wich, Connecticut, and had issue; the fifth, Mary, married John Dawson, of East Haven, and had issue; the sixth, Hannah, married Isaac Penfield, of New Haven, and had issue ; the seventh, John, mar- ried Elizabeth Potter, and had issue, his son Jude serving in the French and Indian war; the eighth, Eliphalet, married Abigail Collins, and had issue, his third son, Amos, serving in the French and Indian war; the ninth, Elizabeth, died in childhood; the tenth, Dorothy, married Benjamin Mallory and had issue ; and the eleventh, Dorcas, married James Way and had issue. Returning now to Henry Ludington, eldest son of William Ludington, 2nd, who was the sixth child of the original William Ludington, it is to be observed that his first child, Daniel, married first Hannah Payne, and second Susannah Clark, and had issue, his second child, Ezra, serving in the French and In- dian war, and his ninth, Collins, in the War of the Revolution; his second, William Ludington, mar- ried first Mary Knowles, of Branford, and second Mary Wilkinson, of Branford, and had issue — of whom we shall hereafter hear much more ; his third, Sarah, died in childhood ; his fourth, Dinah, married Isaac Thorpe; his fifth, Lydia, married Moses [si : HENRY LUDINGTON Thorpe; his sixth, Nathaniel, married first Mary Chidsey, and second Eunice (Russell) Smith, and had issue; his seventh, Moses, married Eunice Chid- sey ; his eighth, Aaron, died at sea ; his ninth, Elisha, died in infancy; his tenth, also named Elisha, settled in Phillipse Precinct, Dutchess County, New York, married, and had a daughter, Abigail, of whom more hereafter; his eleventh, Sarah, probably died unmar- ried, though Dodd's "East Haven Register" says she married Daniel Mead ; and his twelfth, Thomas, was drowned, unmarried. Turning back, once more, to the William Luding- ton last mentioned, who was the second son of Henry Ludington, we find that he was born at Branford, Connecticut, on September 6, 1702. He married Mary Knowles, of Branford, on November 5, 1730. She died on April 16, 1759, and on April 17, 1760,— just a day after the year of mourning had elapsed! — he married for his second wife Mary Wilkinson, also of Branford. His eight children, all of his first wife, were as follows : First, Submit, who married Stephen Johnson, of Branford; second, Mary; third, Henry, of whom we shall hear more, since he forms the chief subject of this book; fourth, Lydia, who married William (or, according to Dodd, Aaron) Buckley, of Branford; fifth, Samuel; sixth, Rebecca; seventh, Anne; and eighth, Stephen. On the night of Mon- day, May 20, 1754, part of William Ludington's house at Branford was destroyed by fire, and his sixth and seventh children, Rebecca and Anne, aged GENEALOGICAL seven and four years, respectively, perished in the flames. Attention is thus finally centered upon the second Henry Ludington, who was the third child of Wil- liam Ludington, who was the second child of the first Henry Ludington, who was the first child of the sec- ond William Ludington, who was the sixth child of the first William Ludington, who was the founder of the Ludington family in America. The sources of information concerning him and his career, which have been mentioned in the preface to this volume, are varied and numerous rather than copious or com- prehensive ; but they are sufficient to indicate that he was a man of more than ordinary force of character and of more than average importance and influence in his time and place, and that he is entitled to re- membrance and to enrolment among those who con- tributed materially, and with no little sacrifice of self, to the making of the State of New York and of the United States of America. Wl CHAPTER II BEFORE THE REVOLUTION HENRY LUDINGTON, the third child of William and Mary (Knowles) Ludington, was born at Branford, Connecticut, on May 25, 1739. Some records give the date as 1738, but the weight of authority indicates the later year. Bran- ford, originally called Totoket, was a part of the second purchase at New Haven in 1638, but was not successfully settled until two years later, when a dis- satisfied company from Wethersfield, headed by William Swayne, secured a grant of it. Together with Milford, Guilford, Stamford, Southold (Long Island), and New Haven, it made up the separate jurisdiction of New Haven, under an ecclesiastical government, until 1665, when all were merged into the greater Colony of Connecticut, Branford being erected into an organized town with representation in the General Court, in 1651. The place won last- ing distinction in 1700, when it was the scene of the practical founding of Yale College; ten ministers, who had been named as trustees of "The School of the Church," each laying upon the table in their meeting-room a number of books, with the words, "I give these books for the founding of a college in this BEFORE THE REVOLUTION colony." The next year the college was chartered and was formally opened at Saybrook, and in 1716- 17 it was permanently removed to New Haven. At the time of Henry Ludington's birth, therefore, New Haven had become fully established as the metropolis of that part of the colony, and Branford, which had at first been its peer and rival, had become reconciled to the status of a suburban town. The educational facilities of Branford were similar to those of other colonial towns; to wit, primitive in character and chiefly under church control. To what extent young Ludington availed himself of them does not appear, but so far as may be judged from his letters and other papers in after years he was an indifferent scholar, probably thinking more of action than of study. Such as his schooling was, however, it was ended at an early date and the school-boy became a man of action when only half-way through his teens. The epoch-making struggle commonly known as the French and Indian War, which was really a part of the Seven Years' War in Europe, and which secured for the English absolute dominance in North Amer- ica and transformed the maps of two continents, be- gan when he was fifteen years old, and made a strong appeal to his adventurous and daring disposition; and at an early date, probably in 1755, though the meager records now in existence are not conclusive on that point, he enlisted in those Colonial levies which formed so invaluable an adjunct to the regular HENRY LUDINGTON British Army in all the campaigns of that war. No complete roster of the Connecticut troops is now in existence, but the "East Haven Register" tells us that many men from East Haven and Branford were enlisted for service with the British Army near the Great Lakes, of whom the greater part were lost through sickness and in battle. In these levies were several members of the Ludington family, beside Henry Ludington. Our genealogical review has al- ready indicated the service in that war of James, Ezra, Timothy, Samuel, Jude, and Amos Luding- ton, uncles and cousins of Henry Ludington. As some of the Ludingtons had, years before the war, removed from Connecticut to Dutchess County, New York, some members of the family were also among the troops from the latter region. Old records tell that in Captain Richard Rea's Dutchess County regiment were two young farmers, Comfort Loudin- ton and Asa Loudinton — obviously meaning Lud- ington — respectively 19 and 17 years old; the former with brown eyes and dark complexion, the latter with brown eyes and fresh complexion. Henry Ludington enlisted in Captain Foote's company of the Second Connecticut Regiment, a notable body of troops which was put forward to bear much of the brunt of the campaign. The regi- ment was at first commanded by Colonel Elizur Goodrich, and later by Colonel Nathan Whiting, one of the most distinguished Colonial officers of that war. The regiment was assigned to duty under C263 BEFORE THE REVOLUTION Major-General (afterward Sir) William Johnson, who, with a Colonial army and numerous Indian allies under the famous Mohawk chieftain Hendrick, was moving to meet the French at Lake George. The march from New Haven was made by way of Amenia and Dover, in Dutchess County, New York, to the Hudson River, and thence northward to the ''dark and bloody ground" of the North Woods. Young Ludington was of a lively and venturesome disposition and, as family traditions show, had a pro- pensity to practical joking which more than once put him in peril of not undeserved punishment, which, however, he managed to avoid. It was early in September, 1755, when he was in only his seventeenth year, that the young soldier re- ceived his "baptism of fire" in the desperate battle of Lake George, near the little sheet of water afterward known as Bloody Pond because of the hue its water took from the gory drainage of the battlefield. Gen- eral Johnson, with his Colonial troops and Indian allies, was moving northward. Baron Dieskau, with a French and Indian army, moving southward, em- barked at Fort Frederick, Crown Point, came down the lake in a fleet of small boats, and landed at Skenesborough, now Whitehall. On the night of Sunday, September 7, word came to Johnson that the enemy was marching down from Fort Edward to Lake George, and early the next morning plans were made to meet them. It was at first suggested that only a few hundred men be sent forward to hold the HENRY LUDINGTON enemy in check until the main army could dispose and fortify itself, but Hendrick, the shrewd Mohawk warrior, objected to sending so small a force. "If they are to fight," he said, "they are too few; if they are to be killed, they are too many." Accordingly the number was increased to 1,200, comprising and, indeed, led by the Connecticut troops. Colonel Ephraim Williams, a brave and skilful officer, was in command, with Colonel Nathan Whiting, of New Haven, as his chief lieutenant. They came upon the enemy at Rocky Brook, about four miles from Lake George, and found the French and Indians arrayed in the form of a crescent, the horns of which extended for some distance on both sides of the road which there led through a dense forest. The devoted Col- onial detachment marched straight at the center of the crescent, and was quickly attacked in front and on both flanks at the same time. Williams and Hen- drick were among the first to fall, and their followers were cut down in great numbers. Thereupon Col- onel Whiting succeeded to the general command, and perceiving that the Colonials were outnumbered and outflanked, ordered a retreat, which was skilfully conducted, with little further loss. When the army was thus reunited, hasty preparations were made to meet the onslaught of the foe, and at noon the con- flict began in deadly earnest. The forces were com- manded, respectively, by Johnson and Dieskau in person, until the former was disabled by a wound, when his place was taken by General Lyman, who BEFORE THE REVOLUTION fulfilled his duties with singular ability and success. After four hours of fighting on the defensive, the English and Colonials leaped over their breastworks and charged the foe with irresistible fury. The French and Indians were routed with great slaugh- ter, and Baron Dieskau himself, badly wounded, was taken prisoner. ^=s Old gun used by Henry Ludington in the French and Indian War. Now owned by Frederick Ludington, son of the late Governor Harrison Ludington, of Wisconsin. (From sketch made by Miss Alice Ludington, great-great-granddaughter of Henry Ludington. Henry Ludington was in the thickest of both parts of this battle, having been in the detachment which was sent forward in advance. He came off un- scathed, but he had the heartrending experience of seeing both his uncle and his cousin shot dead at his side. These were probably his uncle Amos Luding- ton (called Asa in the "East Haven Register," as al- ready noted), son of Eliphalet Ludington, and his cousin Ezra, son of Daniel Ludington. The uncle fell first, pierced by a French bullet. The cousin sprang to his side and stooped to lift him, and in the act was himself shot, and a few moments later both died. Soon after this battle the term of enlist- ment of the Connecticut militia expired, but reenlist- H29] HENRY LUDINGTON ments were general. According to the French and Indian War Rolls, and the Connecticut Historical Collections as searched by Mr. Patrick, Henry Lud- ington again enlisted on April 19, 1756, served under Colonel Andrew Ward at Crown Point, and was dis- charged at the expiration of his term on November 13, 1756. Again, he was in Lieutenant Maltbie's company, under Colonel Newton, at the time of the "general alarm" for the relief of Fort William Hen- ry, in August, 1757, on which occasion his time of service was only fifteen days. Finally, he was in the campaign of 1759, in the Second Connecticut Regi- ment, under Colonel Nathan Whiting, being a mem- ber of David Baldwin's Third Company. In this year he enlisted on April 14, and was duly discharged on December 21, 1759. During this memorable period of service the young soldier marched with the British and American troops to Canada, and partici- pated in the crowning triumph at Quebec, on Sep- tember 13, 1759, and a little later was intrusted with the charge of a company of sixty wounded or invalid soldiers, who were to return to New England. The march was made across country, from Quebec to Bos- ton, in the dead of the very severe winter of 1759-60, and the labors and perils of the journey were suffi- cient to tax to the utmost the skill and resourcefulness of the youth of only twenty years. For many nights their camp consisted of caves or burrows in the snow- drifts, where they slept on beds of spruce boughs, wrapped in their blankets. Provisions failed, too, L30] Jh ^ O H u w ►J W U W .au-5 §4 o s -a o u < c u 'S u 2 > P- -a J* 5 4-* u. _o 1-1 CJ s u o a "d rt s _C « u CO .a s u c c •- — d O !-, C JJ a £ -a a c J< rt 2- O O rj ■ „ ? /.S 2^ 3 V y bO^ sj N "S Z " « 1 ^ \* r '.£ 2^3 v ■-a « o j ^\ « 1 »• .„ a * \? g -« ,? SLs ~ ~ 3 £^ - .2 6 "1 rt *£ | o H^S H- 9 C U ' t N o o > S \5 iZ m r 1 islLs g^^l "*« ^q ^ ^ rijEK .- . ? •* 8 ° .« -o <3 \ *- w 2 g o -2 \i o o *: rt w -^ 'V N. 5 " W ° ° -ri • \ 4 ^ ^11 W j; « •^ B C S 5C8 U um 1 » - B □ D BEFORE THE REVOLUTION and some meals were made of the bark and twigs of birch trees and the berries of the juniper. Through all these hardships young Ludington led his com- rades safely to their destination. Then, in the spring of 1760, he proceeded from Boston to Branford, and thus terminated for the time his active military career. In recognition of his services he received from King George II the commission of a lieutenant in the British Colonial Army, which he held until, in the succeeding reign, news came of the enactment of the Stamp Act, when he resigned it. Later, on Feb- ruary 13, 1773, he accepted a captain's commission from William Tryon, the last British governor of New York, which he held until the beginning of the Revolution. This commission was in the regiment commanded by Beverly Robinson, that eminent Brit- ish Loyalist who was the intermediary between Sir Henry Clinton and Benedict Arnold. It was at Robinson's country mansion that much of Arnold's plotting was done, and it was there, while at dinner, that the traitor received the news of the failure of his treason through the capture of his agent, Major Andre. One other incident of Henry Ludington's service demands passing attention. In one of the returns of his regiment, in connection with the fifteen days' ser- vice in August, 1757, he is recorded as "Deserted." Generally speaking, no worse blot than that can well be put upon a soldier's record. But it is quite ob- vious that in this case it is devoid of its usual serious HENRY LUDINGTON significance. It is certain that he did not actually desert in the ordinary present meaning of that term. This we know, because there is no record nor intima- tion of any steps ever being taken to punish him for what would have been regarded as a heinous crime; because soon after that entry against him he was serving with credit in the army and continued so to do; because thereafter he was intrusted with the im- portant march to Boston which has been described; and because, after having honorably completed his service in the army, he received a royal commission as an officer. In those early days, when an army was campaigning in an almost trackless wilderness and warfare was largely of the most irregular description, it was not difficult for a soldier to become detached and practically lost from the rest of his army, and perhaps not be able to rejoin it for some time. Such a mishap might the more easily have befallen an im- petuous and adventurous youth such as Henry Lud- ington was. And of course the record "Deserted" might naturally enough have been put against his name when he failed to respond to roll-call and no explanation of his absence was forthcoming. In the French and Indian War the Colonial troops were paid for their services by the various Colonial governments, which latter were afterward reim- bursed for such expenditures by the British Govern- ment. It was, however, with a view to compelling the Colonies to bear the cost of the war, by levying taxes upon them at the will of Parliament, that the C32] BEFORE THE REVOLUTION British Government entered upon the fatal policy which a few years later cost it the major part of its American possessions. Because of that change of government, no pension system was ever created for the veterans of that war. In 1815, however, near the close of Henry Ludington's life, such pensions were proposed, and with a view to establishing his eligibil- ity to receive one, in the absence of the authoritative records of the Connecticut troops, he secured from two of his former comrades in arms the following affidavits — here reproduced verbatim et literatim: State of New York Putnam County Jehoidah Wheton, of the town of Carmell in said county, being duly sworn doth depose and say that he is now personally acquainted with Henry Ludington, who lives in the Town of Fredericks in said county and that the deponent has known him for many years past. The de- ponent knows that the above named Henry Lud- ington was in the service in the years 1756 and 1757 under the King's pay, and belonged to the State troops of Connecticut, and that the de- ponent was personally acquainted with the said Henry Ludington during the service above stated, and the deponent was with him the two campaigns, and further the deponent saith that from certain information which he the deponent knows to be true from the above named Henry Ludington of certain transactions which took place in the year 1759 to me the deponent now [333 HENRY LUDINGTON told he verrily believes that the said Henry Lud- ington was in the service that year, and that the deponent places confidence in the truth and verac- ity of the said Henry Ludington, and the de- ponent saith that he together with the above named Henry Ludington was under Capt. Foot in Colonel Nathan Whiting's Ridgement in the service aforesaid ; and further this deponent saith not. his Jehoidah X Wheaton mark Sworn and subscribed the 14th day of September 1815 before me John Phillips, one of the masters in the cort of Chy. in and for sd. State. I, John Byington, of Redding in Fairfield County and State Connecticut, of lawful age de- pose and say that I am well acquainted with Henry Luding- ton of Fredericks, state of New York, that he en- listed under the King's proclamation and served with the Connecticut troops in the war with France, three campaigns, in the company of Capt. Foot, under whom I also served; that he rendered the above service between the year 1756 & 1764, and further say not. John Byington. State Connecticut, County Fairfield, Ss. Red- ding the 15th day of September 1815 personally apperd John Byington the above deponent & made oath to the truth of the above deposition. Lemuel Sanford, Justice Peace. [34^ BEFORE THE REVOLUTION Both of the foregoing affidavits or depositions are taken from copies of the originals, made by Lewis Ludington, son of Henry Ludington, on September 19, 1815, and now in possession of Lewis Luding- ton's son. We have seen that Henry Ludington, at the age of twenty-one, escorted a company of invalided sol- diers from Quebec to Boston in the winter of 1759- 60, and thereafter returned to civil life. One of his first acts was to get married, his bride being his cousin, Abigail Ludington, daughter of his father's younger brother, Elisha Ludington. As already noted, Elisha Ludington upon his marriage had re- moved from Connecticut to Dutchess County, New York, and had settled in what was known as the Phillipse Patent. The exact date of that migration is not recorded, but it was probably some years be- fore the French and Indian war. As the Connecticut troops on their way to that war marched across Dutchess County, through Dover and Amenia, it is to be presumed that Henry Ludington on that mo- mentous journey called at his uncle's home, and saw his cousin, afterward to be his wife, who had been born on May 8, 1745, and was at that time conse- quently a child of about ten years. Whether they met again until his return from Quebec is not surely known, but we may easily imagine the boy soldier's carrying with him into the northern wilderness an affectionate memory of his little cousin, perhaps the last of his kin to bid him good-by, and also her cher- H35] HENRY LUDINGTON ishing a romantic regard for the lad whom she had seen march away with his comrades. At any rate, their marriage followed close upon his return, taking place on May 1, 1760, when he was not yet quite twenty-one and she just under fifteen. Soon after- ward the young couple, apparently accompanied by the rest of Henry Ludington's immediate family, re- moved to Dutchess County, New York, to be there- after identified with that historic region. Dutchess County was one of the twelve counties into which the Province of New York was divided on November 1, 1683, the others being Albany, Cornwall ( now a part of the State of Maine ) , Duke's (now a part of Massachusetts) , King's, New York, Orange, Queen's, Richmond, Suffolk, Ulster, and Westchester. Dutchess then comprised what is now Putnam County, which was set off as a separate county in 1812 and was named for General Israel Putrjam, who was in command of the forces there during much of the Revolutionary War. In 1719 Dutchess County was divided into three wards, known as Northern, Middle, and Southern, each ex- tending from the Hudson River to the Connecticut line. Again, in 1737, these wards were subdivided into seven precincts, called Beekman, Charlotte, Crom Elbow, North, Poughkeepsie, Rhinebeck, and Southeast; and at later dates other precincts, or towns, were formed, to wit: North East in 1746; Amenia in 1762; Pawlings in 1768; and Fredericks- town in 1772. Fishkill and Rombout were also con- n363 1^ ti £ — - ^_r J a >» - +J w 4) « en P O O - X X S 9) O S BEFORE THE REVOLUTION stituted in colonial times. Frederickstown, where the Ludingtons settled and with which we have most to do, was a part of the Phillipse Patent, in the Southern Ward of Dutchess County, now Putnam County. It derived its name from Frederick Phil- lipse, a kinsman of Adolphe Phillipse, the patentee of Phillipse Manor or Patent. It has now been di- vided and renamed, its old boundaries comprising the present towns of Kent, Carmel, and Patterson, and a part of Southeast, the present village of Pat- terson occupying the site of the former Fredericks- burgh. The name of Kent was taken from the family of that name, of which James Kent, the illustrious jurist and chancellor of the State of New York, was a member. It may be of interest to recall at this point, also, that a certain strip of land at the eastern side of Dutchess County was in dispute between New York and Connecticut. This was known as The Oblong, or the Oblong Patent, from its config- uration, and comprised 61,440 acres, in a strip about two miles wide, now forming parts of Dutchess, Put- nam, and Westchester counties and including part of the Westchester town of Bedford, and also Quaker Hill, near Pawling, in Dutchess County, which was once suggested as the capital of the State, and which gets its name from having been first settled by Quak- ers. The dispute over the New York-Connecticut boundary and the consequent ownership of this land arose before 1650, when the Dutch were still owners of New York, or New Netherlands as the latter was [37] HENRY LUDINGTON then called, and it was continued between the two Colonies when they were both under British rule. The settlement was effected by confirming New York in possession of The Oblong, and granting to Connecticut in return a tract of land on Long Island Sound, eight miles by twelve in extent, which was long called the "Equivalent Land," and which is now occupied by Greenwich, Stamford, and other towns. The final demarcation of the boundary was not, how- ever, effected until as late as 1880. The precise date of Henry Ludington's settlement in Dutchess County is not now known. Neither his nor his father's name appears in the 1762 survey of Lot No. 6 of the Phillipse Patent, and it has been as- sumed that therefore his arrival there must have been at a later date than that. This reasoning must, how- ever, be challenged on the ground that — as we shall presently see— on March 12, 1763, he was officially recorded as a sub-sheriff of Dutchess County. It is scarcely likely that he would have been appointed to that office immediately upon his arrival in the county, and we must therefore conclude that he settled there at least early in 1762, if not before that year. He made his home on a tract of 229 acres of land in Frederickstown, at the north end of Lot No. 6 of the Phillipse Patent, on the site of what was afterward appropriately, though with awkward etymology, called Ludingtonville. This land he was not able to purchase outright, but leased for many years from owners who clung to the old feudal notions of tenure ; [38] tf a IT, ►■ in m £ T"H W a fc w i s p C a H u 1-3 h § ,a m d & h 3 P nl Ph Ph ^ n) H E Pi c 3 BEFORE THE REVOLUTION but at last, on July 15, 1812, he effected actual pur- chase and received title deeds from Samuel Gouver- neur and his wife. On that property he built the first grist- and saw-mills in that region, there being no others nearer than the "Red Mills" at Lake Mahopac and those built by John Jay on the Cross River, in the town of Bedford, Westchester County — which latter, by the way, remained in continuous operation, with much of the original framework and sheathing, until 1906, when they were destroyed to make room for one of the Croton reservoirs. Ludington's mills were of course operated by water power, generated by a huge "overshot" wheel, supplied with water con- veyed from a neighboring stream in a channel or mill-race made of timber. Near-by stood the house, which was several times enlarged. The main building was two stories in height, with an attic above. Through the center ran a broad hall, with a stairway broken with a landing and turn. At one side was a parlor and at the other a sitting or living room, and back of each of these was a bedroom. The parlor was wainscoted and ceiled with planks of the fragrant and beautiful red cedar. Beyond the sitting room, at the side of this main building, was the "weaving room," an apartment un- known to our modern domestic economy, but essen- tial in colonial days. It was a large room, fitted with a hand-loom, and a number of spinning wheels, reels, swifts, and the other paraphernalia for the manufacture of homespun fabrics of different kinds. C393 HENRY LUDINGTON This room also contained a huge stone fireplace. Beyond it, at the extreme east of the house, was the kitchen, with its great fireplace and brick or stone oven. The house fronted toward the south, and com- manded a fine outlook over one of the picturesque landscapes for which that region is famed. Years ago the original house was demolished, and a new one was built on the same site by a grandson, George Ludington. The location was a somewhat isolated one, neighbors being few and not near, and the near- est village, Fredericksburgh, on the present site of Patterson, being some miles distant. The location was, however, important, being on the principal route from Northern Connecticut to the lower Hudson Valley, the road leading from Hartford and New Milf ord, Connecticut, through Fredericksburgh, past Colonel Ludington's, to Fishkill and West Point— a circumstance which was of much interest and im- portance to Colonel Ludington in the Revolution, as we shall see. The population of the county at that time was small and scattered. In 1746, or about the time when Elisha Ludington went thither and Abi- gail Ludington was born, the census showed a popu- lation of 8,806, including 500 negro slaves. By 1749 the numbers had actually diminished to 7,912, of whom only 421 were negroes. In 1756, however, there were 14,148 inhabitants, including 859 negroes, and Dutchess was the most populous county in the colony, excepting Albany, which had 17,424 inhabi- tants. The county was at that time able to contribute C40] BEFORE THE REVOLUTION to the army about 2,500 men. It had enjoyed ex- emption from the Indian wars which had ravaged other parts of the colony, and its situation and nat- ural resources gave it the advantages of varied in- dustries. It had the Hudson River at one side for commerce, it was well watered and wooded, its open fields were exceptionally fertile, it had abundant water-power for mills, and it had — though this was not realized until after the colonial period — much mineral wealth. Such was the community in which Henry Luding- ton established himself at the beginning of his man- hood and married life, and in which he quickly rose to prominence. The extent of his holdings of land, and the fact of his proprietorship of important mills, made him a leading factor in business affairs, while his bent for public business soon led him into both the civil and the military service. At that time, from 1761 to 1769, James Livingston was sheriff of Dutchess County, and early in 1763 Henry Luding- ton became one of his lieutenants, as sub-sheriff. The Protestant dynasty in England was so newly estab- lished that elaborate oaths of abjuration and fealty were still required of all office-holders, of whatever rank or capacity, and on March 12, 1763, Henry Ludington, as sub-sheriff, took and subscribed to them, as follows: I, Henry Ludington, Do Solemnly and Sin- cerely, in the Presence of God, Profess, Testify, £413 HENRY LUDINGTON and Declare, That I do Believe, that in the Sacra- ment of the Lord's Supper, there is not any Transubstantiation, of the Elements of Bread and Wine, in the Body and Blood of Christ at or after the Consecration Thereof, by any Person whatsoever. And that the Invocation, or Adora- tion, of the Virgin Mary, or Any other Saint, and the Sacrifice of the Mass, as they are now Used in the Church of Rome, are Superstitious and Idolatrous, and I do Solemnly in the presence of God, Profess, Testify, and Declare, that I make this Declaration, and Every Part thereof, in the plain and Ordinary Sence of the Words read to me, as they are Commonly Understood by Eng- lish Protestants, Without any Evasion, Equivoca- tion, or Mental Reservation whatsoever, and With- out any Dispensation Already Granted to me for this purpose by the Pope, or any other Authority Whatsoever, or Without Thinking that I am Ac- quitted, before God or Man, or Absolved of this Declaration, or any Part thereof, Although the Pope, or any Person or Persons, or Power What- soever, Should Dispence with or Annul the same and Declare that it was Null or Void, from the Beginning. I, Henry Ludington, do Sincerely Promise & Swear, that I will be faithful and bear true Al- legiance to his Majesty King George the Third, and I do Swear that I do from my heart Abhor, Detest, and Abjure, as Impious and Heretical, that Damnable Doctrine and Position, that Princes Excommunicated and Deprived by the Pope, or Any Authority of the See of Rome, May Be Deposed by Their Subjects or any other [423 BEFORE THE REVOLUTION Whatsoever, and I do Declare that no Foreign Prince, Person, Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have, any Jurisdiction, Power, Supe- riority, Pre-eminence, or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual, Within this Realm, and I do Truly and Sincerely acknowledge and profess, Testify and Declare, in my conscience before God and the World, That Our Sovereign Lord King George the Third of this Realm, and all other Dominions and Countrys Thereunto Belonging, and I do Solemnly and Sincerely Declare, that I do believe in my conscience that the person pre- tended to be Prince of Wales During the Life of the Late King James the Second, and since his Decease, Pretending to be and Taking upon him- self the Stile and Title of King of England, by the Name of James the Third, or of Scotland by the name of James the Eighth, or Stile and Title of the King of Great Britain, hath not any right or Title whatsoever, to the Crown of this Realm, or any other Dominions Thereunto Belonging, and I do Renounce, Refuse, and Abjure, any Al- legiance or Obedience to him, and I do Swear, that I will bear Faith, and True Allegiance to his Majesty King George the Third and him will defend, to the utmost of my Power, against all Traiterous Conspiracies and Attempts Whatso- ever, which shall be made Against his Person, Crown or Dignity, and I will do my Utmost En- deavors to Disclose and Make Known to his Majesty and his Successors all Treasons and Traiterous Conspiracies which I shall know to be against him, or any of them, and I faithfully promise to the Utmost of my Power to Support, Maintain and Defend the Successors of the [4311 HENRY LUDINGTON Crown against him the said James and all other Persons Whatsoever, Which Succession by an Act entitled An Act for the further Limitation of the Crown Limited to the Late Princess Sophia, Electress and Dowager of Hanover, and the Heirs of Her Body, being Protestants, and all these things I do plainly and Sincerely Ac- knowledge and Swear according to the Express words by me spoken and according to the Plain and Common Sence and Understanding of the same Words Without any Equivocation, Mental Evasion, or Sinister Reservation Whatsoever, and I do make this Recognition, Acknowledge- ment, Abjuration, Renunciation and Promise heartily, Willingly and Truly, upon the True Faith of a Christian. So help me, God ! Thus qualified by the taking of these oaths, Henry Ludington began public services which lasted, in one capacity and another, for more than a generation in the Colony and State of New York. The first entry in his ledger bears date of "May, A.D. 1763," and runs as follows: "James Livingston Sheriff Dr to Serving county writs (seven in number) the price for serving each writ being from lis. 9d. to £l — 10—9." There follow, under dates of October, 1763, and May, 1764, entries for serving other writs. Among the names of attorneys in the suits appear those of Cromwell, Livingston, Jones, Snedeker, Ludlow, Snook, and Kent ; and among those of par- ties to suits, etc., are those of Joseph Weeks, Jacob Ellis, Uriah Hill, Jacob Griffen, George Hughson^ cm: BEFORE THE REVOLUTION Ebenezer Bennett, and Joseph Crane. In 1764 first appears the name of Beverly Robinson, as the plain- tiff in a suit against one Nathan Birdsall. There is also mention of a suit brought in the name of the "Earl of Starling" as plaintiff before the Supreme Court of the colony— probably William Alexander, or Lord Stirling, the patriot soldier of the Revolu- tion. At this home in Frederickstown the children of Henry and Abigail Ludington, or all of them but the eldest, were born. These children, with the dates of their births, were as follows, as recorded by Henry Ludington in his Family Register, which was in- scribed on a fly-leaf of the ledger already quoted : Sibyl, April 5, 1761. Rebecca, January 24, 1763. Mary, July 31, 1765. Archibald, July 5, 1767. Henry, March 28, 1769. Derick, February 17, 1771. Tertullus, Monday night, April 19, 1773. Abigail, Monday morning, February 26, 1776. Anne, at sunset, March 14, 1778. Frederick, June 10, 1782. Sophia, May 16, 1784. Lewis, June 25, 1786. Of these it is further recorded in the same register that Sibyl was married to Edward Ogden (the name is elsewhere given as Edmund or Henry Ogden) on C45] HENRY LUDINGTON October 21, 1784; that Mary was married to David Travis on September 12, 1785; that Archibald was married to Elizabeth on September 23, 1790; and that Rebecca was married to Harry Pratt on May 7, 1794. 1*61 CHAPTER III THE BEGINNING OF THE REVOLUTION IN order justly to appreciate the circumstances in which Henry Ludington and his young family found themselves about fifteen years after his return from the French and Indian war, it will be desirable to recall briefly the political and social conditions generally prevailing throughout the Colonies at that time, which were nowhere more marked than in New York City and the rural counties lying just north of it. During the two or three years before the actual declaration of American independence, or secession from England, the people of the Colonies were di- vided into two parties, the Patriots and the Loyalists or Tories. The latter maintained the right of Eng- land to govern the Colonies as she pleased, and re- garded even a protest against the maladministration of George Ill's ministers as little short of sacrilege. The former were by no means as yet committed to the idea of American separation from the mother coun- try, but they were most resolute in their demand for local self-government, and for government according to the needs of the Colonies rather than the caprices of English ministers. When they first placed the legend "Liberty and Union" upon their colonial flag, and called it the "Grand Union Flag," they had in C47] HENRY LUDINGTON mind liberty under the British constitution and con- tinued union with England. Nevertheless, antago- nism between the two parties became as bitter as ever it was between Roundhead and Cavalier in Stuart days; and while in some respects Boston and Phila- delphia figured more conspicuously in the pre-revolu- tionary agitation and operations than did New York, there was probably no place in all the Colonies where the people were more evenly and generally divided between the two parties, or where passions rose higher or were more strongly maintained, than in and about the last-named city. No ties of neighborliness, friend- ship, or even family relationship sufficed to prevent or to quell the animosities which arose over the political interests of the Colonies. Nowhere had the Patriots a more ardent or persuasive leader than young Alex- ander Hamilton, or the Tories a more uncompromis- ing champion than Rivington, the printer, whose of- fice was at last sacked and gutted by wrathful Pa- triots. An illuminating side-light is thrown upon the New York state of mind by an item in the New York "Journal" of February 9, 1775, as follows: A company of gentlemen were dining at a house in New York. One of them used the word Tory several times. His host asked him, "Pray, Mr. , what is a Tory?" He replied, "A Tory is a thing whose head is in England, and its body in America, and its neck ought to be stretched!" Nor were these passions by any means confined to the urban but not always urbane community on C483 THE BEGINNING OF THE REVOLUTION Manhattan Island. They prevailed with equal force in the rural regions of Westchester and Dutchess counties. During the Revolutionary War that bor- der region, between the British garrison on Manhat- tan Island and the American strongholds in the Highlands of the Hudson, was the fighting ground of the belligerents, and was also unmercifully harried and ravaged by the irregular succors of both sides, the "Cow Boys" and "Skinners," and others, cele- brated in the unhappy Andre's whimsical ballad of "The Cow Chase." Patriots from Westchester County were foremost among those who wrecked Rivington's Tory printing shop, and an aggravated sequel to the item just cited from the New York "Journal" is provided in the annals of Dutchess County a little later in the same year. At that time a County Committee, or Committee of Safety— of which we shall presently hear much more— had been formed in that county, for the purpose of holding the Tories in check, and it had forcibly deprived some men of their arms and ammunition. The despoiled Tories made appeal to the Court of Common Pleas for redress, and James Smith, a justice of that court, according to a contemporary narrative, "undertook to sue for and recover the arms taken from the Tories by order of said committee, and actually committed one of the committee who assisted at disarming the Tories ; which enraged the people so much that they rose and rescued the prisoner, and poured out their resentment on this villanous retailer of the law." The HENRY LUDINGTON "resentment" seems to have been poured out of buck- ets and pillows, for we are told that Justice Smith and his relative, Coen Smith, were "very handsomely tarred and feathered, for acting in open contempt of the resolves of the County Committee!" In or near that part of Dutchess County in which Henry Ludington lived a third small but not insig- nificant factor was involved in the problem. This was provided by the members of the Society of Friends, who were settled at Quaker Hill, near Pawling, in The Oblong. This was the first com- munity in America to abolish negro slavery, in 1775, and on that account it was probably regarded with some suspicion. But worse still was the regard given to it in the strife between Patriots and Tories. There can be little doubt that the sentiments and wishes of the Quakers were largely with the Patriots. Yet their religious principle of non-resistance forbade them to take up arms or to engage in forcible conflict of any kind. They were therefore generally looked upon by the Patriots as Tories, and were on that ac- count sometimes fined and otherwise punished, while on the other hand, the Tories made themselves free to quarter troops upon them and to demand aid of them at will. On the whole, however, they appear to have commanded the respect of the Patriots, for their sin- cerity, and thus to have been far more leniently dealt with than were the more militant Tories outside the Society of Friends. The earliest organization of the Patriots in and L503 THE BEGINNING OF THE REVOLUTION about New York was a Committee of Vigilance, the chief functions of which were to watch for oppressive acts of the British Government and incite colonial protests against them. This was in 1774 superseded by a Committee of Fifty-One, and it in turn in the same year gave place to a Committee of Inspection, of sixty members. In both of these latter John Jay, who was a neighbor and friend of Henry Ludington, was conspicuous, and it is to be presumed that Henry Ludington himself was either a member of the com- mittees or at least was in active sympathy with their work. In April, 1775, came a crisis and the turning point in the movement for independence. The old Colonial Assembly of New York went out of exist- ence on April 3. Then came the news of the first clash of arms at Lexington and Concord, acting as a spark in a powder-magazine. "Astonished by ac- counts of acts of hostility in the moment of expecta- tion of terms of reconciliation," said the lieutenant- governor of New York in his account of the occur- rence, "and now filled with distrust, the inhabitants of the city burst through all restraint on the arrival of the intelligence from Boston, and instantly emptied the vessels laden with provisions for that place, and then seized the city arms and in the course of a few days distributed them among the multitude, formed themselves into companies and trained openly in the streets ; increased the number and power of the com- mittee before appointed to execute the association of the Continental Congress, convened themselves by C513 HENRY LUDINGTON beat of the drum for popular resolutions, have taken the keys of the custom house by military force ; shut up the port, drawn a small number of cannon into the country; called all parts of the country to a Pro- vincial Convention; chosen twenty delegates for this city, formed an association now signing by all ranks, engaging submission to committees and congresses, in firm union with the rest of the continent, and openly avow a resolution not only to resist the acts of Parliament complained as grievances, but to with- hold succors of all kinds from the troops and to repel every species of force, wherever it may be exerted, for enforcing the taxing claims of Parliament at the risk of their lives and fortunes." This only half co- herent but wholly intelligible and graphic narrative tells admirably how the Patriot sentiment of New York startled into life and action. A year later it was forcibly repressed by the British garrison on Manhattan Island, but in the counties at the north it continued dominant and triumphant. The "association now signing by all ranks" was promptly entered into by Henry Ludington and his neighbors in Dutchess County, as the following transcript, from the MS. collection of Mr. Patrick, shows, the date of the original being April 29, 1775 : A General Association agreed to and sub- scribed by the Freeholders and Inhabitants of the County of Dutchess : Persuaded: That the Salvation of the Rights & Liberties of America depends, under God, on the H521 THE BEGINNING OF THE REVOLUTION firm Union of its Inhabitants in a Vigorous Pro- secution of the Measures necessary for its Safety ; and Convinced of the Necessity of preventing the Anarchy & Confusion which attend the Dissolu- tion of the Powers of Government, We, the Free- holders and Inhabitants of the County of Dut- chess, being greatly alarmed at the avowed Design of the Ministry to raise a Revenue in America, and shocked by the bloody Scene now acting in the Massachusetts Bay, Do, in the most solemn Manner, Resolve, never to become Slaves ; and do associate under all the Ties of Religion, Honour and Love to our Country, to adopt and endeavor to carry into execution, whatever Meas- ures may be recommended by the Continental Congress, or resolved upon by our Provincial Conventions, for the Purpose of preserving our Constitution and opposing the execution of the several arbitrary and oppressive Acts of the Brit- ish Parliament, until a Reconciliation between Great Britain and America, on Constitutional Principles (which we most ardently desire) can be obtained : And that we will in all things, follow the Advice of our General Committee, respecting the Purposes aforesaid : the Preservation of peace and good Order and the Safety of Individuals,, and private property. Mathew Paterson Malcolm Morison Joseph Chandler Alexr. Kidd Comfort Ludinton Henry Ludinton Ruben Miers Elijah Oakley James Dickinson Junr. William alkin. Isaiah Bennett David Atkins Stephen Baxter. [53] HENRY LUDINGTON One other signature is illegible. Those of the two Ludingtons are clear and firm. The new Provincial Congress of New York met in the New York City Hall on May 22, 1775, and re- mained in session until May 29, its most important act being the adoption of the following resolution : Resolved, That it be and hereby is recom- mended to all counties in this colony (who have not already done it) to appoint County Commit- tees and also sub-committees for their respective townships and districts without delay, in order to carry into execution the resolutions of the Con- tinental and this Provincial Congress; And that it is also recommended to every inhabitant of this colony who has neglected to sign the general asso- ciation to do it with all convenient speed, and for this purpose that the committees in the respective counties do tender the said association to every in- habitant within the several districts in each coun- ty; And that the said committees and persons respectfully do return the said associations and the names of those who shall refuse to sign the same to this Congress by the 15th day of June next, or sooner if possible. This obviously "meant business." It compelled every inhabitant of the colony to align himself, either with the Patriots or with the Loyalists; with a cer- tainty that if he chose the former, he would be held as a traitor by the British Government, and if he chose the latter, he would be subject to whatever pains and penalties his incensed Patriot neighbors might see C54] THE BEGINNING OF THE REVOLUTION fit to impose upon him. Into the work thus recom- mended by the Congress, Henry Ludington entered with zeal and ardor. He was at the head of the local committee, in Fredericksburgh Precinct, and also a member of the Dutchess County Committee, among his colleagues being John Jay, William Duer, Jac- obus Swartwout, and other eminent Patriots. How vigorously and unsparingly these committees went to work will appear if we anticipate for a moment the chronological record by a year. On a motion offered by John Jay on June 16, 1776, the Provincial Congress of New York declared guilty of treason, with the penalty of death, all persons inhab- iting or passing through the colony, or state, as it then began to be called, who should give aid or com- fort to the enemy. A week later the Continental Congress adopted a similar resolution. It does not appear that this penalty was ever actually imposed, but the terror of it was held as a powerful measure of restraint over the Tories. Again, at Conner's tavern, at Fishkill, Dutchess County, on October 8, 1776, there was organized a secret committee "for inquir- ing into, detecting and defeating conspiracies . . . against the liberties of America," with full power to send for persons and papers, call out the militia, and arrest or expel persons regarded as dangerous to the state, apparently without any judicial process. Thereafter numerous parties of suspects were sent in by the various local committees, including men, women, and children. All who consented to sign an C55H HENRY LUDINGTON oath of allegiance to Congress were dismissed. The others were variously dealt with. Some were exiled from the State, some were imprisoned, and some re- leased on parole, to remain near Fishkill within call and surveillance of the committee. The chairman of this committee was William Duer, and if Henry Ludington was not actually among its members he was certainly one of its most trusted and efficient agents. It continued in existence and action until February 27, 1777, when it was dissolved by the State Convention and was replaced by a Board of Commissioners. Two minutes of the proceedings of this committee will serve the double purpose of show- ing the character of its activities and the part which Henry Ludington played in executing its decrees. The first is dated only four days after the organiza- tion of the committee : In Committee appointed by a Resolution of the Convention of the State of New York for en- quiring into, detecting and defeating all Conspir- acies which may be form'd in the said State against the Liberties of America. Fish Kill Octr. 12. 1776. This Committee taking into Consideration Coll. Ludington's Letter respecting Thomas Menzes Esqr. received yesterday — Ordered that Coll. Ludington carry into Exe- cution the former Orders of this Committee re- specting Thomas Menzes Esqr. in such manner as to him shall appear most prudent. — Ordered that the Secretary transmit to ColL [56: c W ■{? 077*77/ prfit*-. Qs{Ji r; wi/Ve-J /fry ^ ffi ' &0vfo^<^<7 isrfb^ed? Mf/?"t^ & /*(y^L nc surest >r J t/ij£T* e^-o tyrfbrt^eb J?f/ - — ¥ f Reduced Fac-simile Df LettEr, tram Committee on Conspiracies, tn Col. Henry Ludington. i Original in possession of Charles H Liid)a«ton. New York City I THE BEGINNING OF THE REVOLUTION Ludington by Express a Copy of the above Order. Extract from the Minutes, A. W. D. Peyster Secry. The second is dated eight days later : warrant from commite to aprhend sundry per- sons In Committee of the Convention of the State of New York appointed for enquiring into, de- tecting and defeating all Conspiracies which may be form'd in the said State against the Liberties of America. Fish Kill Octr. 20, 1776. Whereas this Committee did on the 17th inst. resolve that the following persons, Inhabitants of South East and Frederick Precincts in the County of Dutchess, should forthwith be dis- arm'd apprehended and secured, to witt, Uriah Townsend, Ebenezer Rider, Charles Cullen*, Barns Hatfield, Uriah Wright, Joseph Hitch- cock, Eli Crosby, Dr. Daniel Bull*, Charles Theal, and Gilbert Dickeson — o Ordered that Coll. Luddington do forthwith apprehend and bring before this Committee the above mentioned Persons and that he secure the Papers of such whose Names are mark'd with an Asterisk in order that the same be examined by this Committee. — Ordered that Capt. Clarke detach Leut. Haight with a Party of 15 Men, to repair to Coll. Luddington and to follow such orders as they may receive from him. Signed by Order of the Committee, Wm. Duer Chairman. C57] HENRY LUDINGTON In the margin of this warrant, which is here copied from the original in the possession of Charles H. Ludington, are these additional names : oDaniel Babbit Jeremiah Birch Junr. David Nash Samuel Towner William Merrit Thomas Carl* Daniel Brundage Moses Fowler. The Charles Cullen mentioned in the warrant was a brother-in-law of the distinguished jurist, Chancel- lor Kent. In order to understand clearly the geographical scope of the operations already and hereafter cred- ited to Henry Ludington, the division of that part of Dutchess County into precincts should here be explained, with the aid of a map. The reference is to that southern part of Dutchess County which was afterward set off, as at present, into Putnam County. From 1737 down to March 24, 1772, it was known as the South Precinct. On the latter date it was divided into three longitudinal strips, that along the Hudson being called Phillipse, or Philipsburgh Precinct ; that in the central and east central part being called Fred- ericksburgh Precinct; and the smallest strip at the extreme east, consisting of part of The Oblong hitherto mentioned, being known as South East Pre- cinct. It may be added, in anticipation of the narra- tive, that on March 17, 1788, these names were changed to Philipstown, Frederickstown, and South East, respectively; that on March 17, 1795, the towns of Carmel and Franklin were formed from Freder- [58] 7 --—v* — •-- — ' ~^S/7 *■ *■ •-- — - » i— - ^ - /■ i^-^w^- ^*- * **■»-— ,• #^c — m ts r Titer 7 CM w&* £, ***■?,, C foe £j) ^ ^ />Jj£?J v v?y 'r&strU'e-.. /P ftr&tri^?^ $fe ->&o7^ ,^z /,& 5 £\ 3 j : *? I ZA^rifi-^i) v*/?<2./W/Cv2 &6'?'0C^*7c-~rft*^> frrzz_ c^*^P 4'!//*// fir'/*. Q^&t/aS^, QyOa^f 0*C7 %ULy **T C-Cy VAC***/ *_ /&***+ .#**** - Reduced Fac-sirnilE Df ordEr of arrsst issuEd by Win. Duet, Chairman of Cammittse an ConspiraclES, Df th.B "Provincial Congress of the State of New York" to Col, Henry Ludington, (OrigiDal paper in possession of Charles H Ludington. New York City.) THE BEGINNING OF THE REVOLUTION Ickstown, and the remainder of the last named was called Fredericks; that on April 6, 1808, Franklin was changed to Patterson, and on April 15, 1817, Fredericks was changed to Kent. It may further be explained that the Philipsburgh Precinct was sub- divided into two nearly equal longitudinal strips, and the one along the Hudson River was again divided laterally into three parts, making four lots in all, which were numbered from 1 to 4, and which in the partition of the original Phillipse Patent were ap- portioned as follows: No. 1, at the extreme south- west, Susannah Robinson; No. 2, next at the west center, Philip Phillipse; No. 3, at the northwest, Mary Phillipse; and No. 4, the long strip inland from the river, Susannah Robinson. The Freder- icksburgh Precinct was likewise divided into three lon- gitudinal strips, and the easternmost of them into three laterally, making five lots in all, numbered from 5 to 9, and these were apportioned as follows : No. 5, the long strip next to No. 4 of Philipsburg, to Mary Phillipse ; No. 6, a long strip next to No. 5, to Philip Phillipse; No. 7, a "short lot" at the northeast, to Susannah Robinson; No. 8, a short lot at the east center, to Philip Phillipse; and No. 9, a short lot at the southeast, to Mary Phillipse. When, as we shall presently see, Henry Ludington became colonel commanding a militia regiment, his territorial com- mand included all of these nine lots excepting Nos. 7 and 8. He was thus of all the militia commanders nearest to the seat of government when it was at [593 HENRY LUDINGTON Fishkill, and was brought much into contact with state officials there. Appreciating the important part which the militia would play in the conflict which was then seen to be impending and inevitable, the Provincial Congress of New York, in session at New York City on Au- gust 22, 1775, adopted an elaborate measure for the enlistment, organization and equipment of such troops. Every county, city, manor, town, precinct, and district within the colony was to be divided by a local committee into districts or beats, in such a man- ner that in each beat might be formed one military company, ordinarily to consist of eighty-three able- bodied men and officers, between the ages of sixteen and fifty — afterward sixty — years. Not less than five nor more than ten such companies were to form a regiment, and the regiments were to be organized into brigades. One brigade was to be formed of the militia of Dutchess and Westchester counties, commanded by a brigadier-general. It was also ordered — That every man between the ages of 16 and 50 do with all convenient speed furnish himself with a good Musket or firelock & Bayonet Sword or Tomahawk, a Steel Ramrod, Worm, Priming Wire and Brush fitted thereto, a Cartouch Box to contain 23 rounds of cartridges, 12 flints and a knapsack agreeable to the directions of the Con- tinental Congress under forfeiture of five shill- ings for the want of a musket or firelock and of one shilling for want of a bayonet, sword or [60] Map of Philipse patent, showing original divisions Map showing- territory (shaded portion) covered by Colonel Ludington's regiment THE BEGINNING OF THE REVOLUTION tomahawk, cartridgebox, cartridge or bullet. That every man shall at his place of abode be also provided with one pound of powder and three pounds of bullets of proper size to his musket or firelock. There were numerous additional prescriptions, concerning discipline and drill, the duties and re- sponsibilities of officers, and the penalties to be im- posed for non-compliance. In case of any alarm, invasion or insurrection, every man thus enrolled was immediately to repair to headquarters, to wit, the home of his captain, and the captain was to march the company straight to the scene of invasion or insur- rection "to oppose the enemy," at the same time send- ing word to the regimental or brigade commander. A little later, to wit, on December 20, the Provincial Congress ordered that the militia of Dutchess and Westchester counties should form two separate brig- ades ; whence we may assume that a larger enrolment of militia men was secured in those counties than had at first been expected. The militia were called out whenever needed, and were kept out as long as they were needed, but they could be taken outside of the colony or state for no more than three months at a time. Sometimes, as Mr. James A. Roberts explains in his work on "New York in the Revolution," a regiment or half of a regiment would be called out half a dozen times in the course of a year, perhaps for half a dozen days at a time ; and again might not be called out once for £61] HENRY LUDINGTON a whole year. The regiments were commonly desig- nated first by their colonels' names and next by their counties. Officers and men seem to have served, says Mr. Roberts, in different organizations almost indis- criminately. At one call they were in one and at an- other they were in another regiment or company. Each colonel had almost unlimited powers in the dis- trict to which his regiment belonged, and he was specially required to see that every able-bodied male inhabitant between the ages of sixteen and sixty years was enrolled. Moreover, every such person must serve whenever called upon to do so, under pen- alty of fine and imprisonment; and if incapacitated, he must contribute toward the cost of securing and equipping another man. Among the rations served to all were tobacco, sugar, and tea, and in addition the colonels and chaplains received liberal allowances of rum. A colonel's pay was $75 a month, and a pri- vate soldier's pay $6.66 a month; not always in money, but sometimes in state scrip and sometimes in authority to "impress" cattle and goods; for all which things taken receipts were to be given to the owners in the name of the state, so that payment could afterward be made. This enactment by New York was made in pur- suance of an act of the Continental Congress, on July 18, 1775, which "recommended to the inhabi- tants of all the united English Colonies in North America that all able-bodied, effective men between sixteen and fifty years of age, in each Colony, might 1621 THE BEGINNING OF THE REVOLUTION form themselves into regular companies of Militia, to consist of one captain, two lieutenants, one ensign, four sergeants, four corporals, one clerk, one drum- mer, one fifer, and about sixty-eight privates." Each company was permitted to elect its own offi- cers ; the companies were to be formed into regiments or battalions, officered with a colonel, lieutenant- colonel, two majors, an adjutant or quartermaster. All officers above the rank of captain were to be appointed by the respective Provincial Assem- blies, or Conventions, or by the Committees of Safety. One fourth part of the militia in every county was to consist of minute men, who were ordered "to be ready on the shortest Notice to march to any Place where their Assistance may be required for the De- fence of their own or a neighboring Colony." As the minute men were expected to be called into action be- fore the body of the militia were sufficiently trained, it was recommended "that a more particular and diligent attention be paid to their instruction in mili- tary discipline." The equipment of these militia companies was at first painfully meager, and their muster-rolls, "spelled by the unlettered Muse," were such as would drive the modern officer to despair. As an ex- ample, the muster-roll of Captain Nathaniel Scrib- ner's company may be cited, copied verbatim et lite- ratim from an original MS. in the possession of Mr. Charles H. Ludington : C63I] HENRY LUDINGTON Capt. Scribner's muster role. Capt Nathaniel Scribner gun sword [ o Ltn Daniel martine o o catrig be In David merrick o sword . o St. Thomas grigrory o o o St. Caleb hazen o o o St makis Brundige o o o CI Thomas willson gun o catrig bo CI Isaac Evritt gun sword o Benianan hamblon fiffer Stephen Hyatt Drummer Joshua grigrory o o o gilbirt ganung gun o o Samuel Pears o o o Caleb Pears gun o o Rusel grigrory gun sword o freman hopkins o o o Samuel horton o o o Joseph hopkins o o o alexander pears o o o henery Bolding gun sword o John f erguson gun o o Noah robinson o o o Joseph ganung gun o o Jesse ganung gun o o Elezur hazen gun o o william haighson o o o Lewis Furguson o o o abiiag Barker o o o Samuel Jinkins gun o o Jacob mead gun o o John mcLean gun o o John Lounsbury o o o John thrustin o o o C64] THE BEGINNING OF THE REVOLUTION Nathanel finch o o o Jona Carle o o o Thomas Furguson Richard p e grigrory James Carle o o o o o o o o o Nathaniel Jinkins o o o David Storms gun sword [ o John Sloot o o o John frost o o o gorge Evritt Edward Vermilyea John Stedel gun o o sword o o o o o Jonathan hustice gun o o Thomas Hall gun sword o James Barker o o o John wright o o o Thadeus Ramond gun o o robint wright o o o Beniaman Birdsel o o o Isaac ganung Job Veail gun o o o o o Isaac Sloot o o o adonija carle Samuel Conkling Elisha Bolding Jeremiah hughson Jerediah davis o o o o gun o o o o o o o o o o alaxander Brown o o o gedien Simkins o o o David Fowler o o o Daniel worden o o o abraham Furguson Jones Semans o o o o o o Nathanel Robinson o o o John Sloot o o o C65] HENRY LUDINGTON Annexed to the muster roll was the following ad- dendum : These air men What is gon into the servis Leftenant John munrow St. Josiah grigrory Jacob birdsel Jacob ganung John Shaw Solomon hustice parce holding John Vermilya Richard Barker Daniel grigrory Zebulon wright Isaac merick Eli hopkins James mcf arling Rhubin finch Timothy wood Jonathan Semans william Virmilya Thomas hagson Jonathan hopkins moses hazen Samuel bouton Isaac Lounsbury. In the work of enlisting and organizing these militia levies the most efficient men were naturally those who had already had military experience and command as officers in some of the colonial wars. Henry Ludington was among these. He had had such experience in a noteworthy degree, and to it 1661 THE BEGINNING OF THE REVOLUTION he added both physical and temperamental aptitude for military labors, and an ardent spirit of patriot- ism. Leaving the service in 1759 as a lieutenant, he had, as already related, resigned his commission in indignation at the Stamp Act. On February 13, 1773, however, he accepted a commission as captain in Colonel Beverly Robinson's Dutchess County regiment, and this commission, which was signed by William Tryon, the last British governor of New York, he held until 1775, or possibly 1776, when he cast it aside and entered the "Rebel" or Patriotic service. The militia of Dutchess County was organ- ized, under the law already cited, in the fall of 1775, and on October 17 Petrus Ten Broeck, the colonel of the First or Rhinebeck and Northwest regiment, was commissioned brigadier-general commanding. Of the Second regiment of Dutchess County, Jac- obus Swartwout was colonel, and when in time the militia of the county was so increased as to form two brigades, he was, on March 3, 1780, appointed brig- adier-general commanding one of them. Swart- wout's commission as colonel was also issued on Oc- tober 17, 1775, and at the same time Malcolm Morri- son was commissioned first major and Henry Lud- ington was commissioned second major of his regi- ment. Ludington seems also to have served as cap- tain of the company raised in his home district, and to have been prompt and energetic in his service ; for on February 20, 1776, we find Colonel Swartwout in a letter to the Provincial Congress reporting that C67: HENRY LUDINGTON he was in hourly expectation of Captain Luding- ton's appearance at regimental headquarters, to- gether with Captains Woodford from Pawling's, Clearck from Beekman's, and Durling from Rombout Precinct. The Congress the next day or- dered that all the men thus reported should serve un- til May 1 of that year, unless sooner discharged. Soon afterward came Ludington's first promo- tion. On March 8, 1776, Malcolm Morrison, the first major of Swartwout's regiment, addressed to the Provincial Congress of New York this letter: Gentlemen: Whereas the gentlemen of the Provincial Congress has been pleased to appoint me First Major in Colo. Swartwout's regiment, and as my situation and business is such, that it is not within my power to serve without doing injustice to myself and creditors, having a con- siderable interest in my hands to settle, and hav- ing a large family to take care of without any person to assist me in settling my affairs, and whereas Major Henry Ludington, appointed in the militia, is prevailed upon to accept the com- mission sent me, and if agreeable to you, do re- sign in his favor. He can be recommended by Colo. Swartwout or the Committee of Dutchess County, and I hope you will be prevailed upon to appoint him in my stead, he being a person that has served in the last war and well ac- quainted in the military service, and, Gentlemen, your compliance will greatly oblige, Your Very Humble Servant, Malcolm Morrison. nesn THE BEGINNING OF THE REVOLUTION Mr. Ludington waits for an answer. N.B. Gentlemen, enclosed you have the com- mission. This extraordinarily naive and unconventional let- ter was received on March 9, apparently being borne by Major Ludington himself as messenger. It was favorably acted upon, and the next day, March 10, Ludington was made first major of the regiment in Morrison's place. At this time the companies were not yet filled, and the regiment was small. But re- cruiting went on rapidly, so that by the first of May, 1776, the regiment was actually too large. Accord- ingly on May 6 the Committee of Dutchess County took action for the formation of another regiment in that part of the county, as reported in the following letter to the Provincial Congress : Sir: — It having been represented to the Gen- eral Committee of this County, that the Southern Regiment of Militia was too large and exten- sive, containing 12 companies and covering a space of country upwards of 30 miles in length, we have, therefore, not only because in other respects it was expedient, but also in compliance with the Resolution of Congress prohibiting a Regiment to consist of more than 10 Companies, divided it, and instead of one have formed the Militia in that quarter into 2 regiments, together with a list of persons nominated for Field Offi- cers. As this part of our Militia will remain un- regimented till the Officers receive their Commis- sions, we must request that the Commissions be 1691 HENRY LUDINGTON made out as soon as possible and sent to the Com- mittee in Rombout's Precinct with directions to forward them to the Officers immediately. I remain, by order of the Committee, Your very humble servant, Egbert Benson Chairman. The new regiment, as described in an enclosure in Mr. Benson's letter, was to consist of all the militia in Phillipse Precinct, and in all of Fredericksburgh Precinct "except the Northern and Middle Short Lots" — at the northeast, as hitherto explained. The field officers nominated were as follows: Colonel, Moses Dusenbury; lieutenant-colonel, Henry Lud- ington; first major, Reuben Ferris; second major, Joshua Nelson; adjutant, Joshua Myrick; quarter- master, Solomon Hopkins. These nominations were promptly confirmed. A little later Henry Luding- ton was commissioned colonel of this regiment, to succeed Colonel Dusenbury. The exact date is not now ascertainable, but according to the mutilated re- mains of the commission, a facsimile of which is given in this volume, it was some time in June, 1776. The commission — his first as colonel — was issued by the Provincial Congress of the Colony of New York, and was one of the last acts of that body, which in that month of June, 1776, went out of existence, and on July 9 following was succeeded by a new Pro- vincial Congress, meeting at White Plains, which the next day, July 10, changed its name to the Conven- tion of the Representatives of the State of New L70] ta K o In I o o etf - O ^ in cn ° w 3 .*, ^ Q ^ a £ %£ o % y • * \ M s - v -^ V ^ s.^V \ t s a v *Ni a 5 v a o G ^ ^ s ^ ^ -IS -8 3 G * i-< O P-. ^ V ^> !^ i>"g G ^ b, •?:<3 o o _ jbS & *<§ B^^5 •»**-ie*ts* 8 cS « c 5 " oO - o vG .5 .2 O h "3 ir! <43 J*,.£ u O 2 -.S rt -3 u Q K S! -E o t^ <. S-. n If ""a t! a •^s^ s ^"S> S I g 9 2 «s r £ " C3 a JS ^ •JJJ ^ 3 "^ . >4 * \£ '* u v.. ^s, \ w C ^ si ^ < fc S ^ ^ N THE REVOLUTION Honoured Sir: in haste I am to acquaint you that they came up Last night with 2 frigets and five or six Royale and tenders and about 40 flat Bottommed boats and landed about 3 thousand men under the command of governor Tryon. They immediately took the heights above Tarry- town and from thence kept the Heights until they thought they had got above our party. But Luckily we had got above them and paused at mr Youngses where we thought Best to move towards them where we were in open view of them and found them vastly superior to us in numbers and moved off to Rights mills, Having no asistance more than our Little party belong- ing to our Regiment. I found on our Retreat before we got back to Youngses they had sent forward a flag, But found that was in view of trapping us as they had flanking parties who we discovered in order to surround us. But after clearing the Regiment I rode Back and met the flag within a quarter of a mile of their main body. The purport of his errand was that governor Tryon Had sent him to acquaint me that if we would give up our arms and submit they would show us mersy or otherways they were deter- mined to take us and strip the contre (country). Sent in answer that as Long as we had a man alive I was determined to oppose them and they might come on as soon as they pleased. We have not lost a man and the last move of the enemy was from Youngses towards the plains. N. B. the maj.-is Gone home on furlow Henry Ludinton. D03] HENRY LUDINGTON This report is unquestionably authentic, although the "P. S." has no address, date nor signature, and is on a separate sheet of paper from the letter and the "N. B." But it is in Henry Ludington's hand- writing, precisely the same as the signed letter, and is on precisely the same kind of paper. Doubtless, then, the "P. S." was hurriedly written after the let- ter, the British attack having occurred between the two writings, and was enclosed with the letter with- out taking time to sign it in any way. The MSS. were in the possession of the late Douglas Putnam, of Harmar, Ohio, a great-grandson of General Put- nam, and were left by him to his daughter, Mrs. Francke H. Bosworth, of New York. It is interest- ing to observe that it was with his old chief, Tryon, that Ludington had on this occasion to deal again. He estimates the number of the British three times as high as does the other and less authoritative chron- icler, and is probably more nearly correct. It may be assumed that the former statement that he had ''about five hundred militia" was much exaggerated. His own official report of the day before shows his entire force at Wright's Mills to have comprised "One Colonel, 1 Lt. Colonel, 5 Captains, 10 Leuten- nants, no Ensign, no Chaplain, 1 Adjutant, 1 Quar- termaster, 1 Surgeon, no Surgeons mate, 19 Ser- geants, 9 Drummers and Fifers, 182 present fit for duty, 19 sick present, 3 Sick Absent, 19 on com- mand, 10 on Furlough, Total 233." With such a mere handful, he certainly acquitted himself most C 10411 THE REVOLUTION creditably against the vastly superior force of Tryon. Putnam was at Peekskill for the express purpose of guarding the passage up the river. He had there about 600 regulars and a much larger number of militia. Governor George Clinton was at Fort Montgomery, and his brother James Clinton at Fort Clinton, with combined forces variously reported at from 600 to 1200 men, mostly militia. Putnam had scout boats along the river, and an elaborate system of scouts on land. Yet, says General De Peyster, "the British Clinton . . . took advantage of a fog, transferred his troops over to the western side of the river, to Stony Point, made a wonderful march across or rather around the Dunderberg Mountain, and carried Forts Clinton and Montgomery by as- sault, performing the most brilliant British operation during the seven years' war." George Clinton suf- fered heavy losses in troops, and narrowly escaped capture; the State capital, Kingston, was exposed to the enemy's advance; and Putnam retired to the mountains, sending word to Gates that he must pre- pare for the worst as he could not prevent the enemy from advancing up the river to the aid of Burgoyne. "The enemy can go to Albany with great expedition and without any opposition." In the presence of this disaster two things were uncommonly fortunate for the American cause. One was that Gates was not alone in the north, but had Arnold, Schuyler, and Morgan with him to brace him up. The other was that [105] HENRY LUDINGTON the British did not attempt to go on up to Albany. After garrisoning Fort Montgomery, Sir Henry Clinton returned to New York. On October 15, he sent an expedition, under General Vaughan, up to Kingston, and the next day burned that village, the State government having previously fled to Pough- keepsie. Other ravages, of looting and burning, were committed along the river, to the disgrace of the British arms. But there was some consolation to the stricken patriots in the news that the very day after the burning of Kingston, Burgoyne, beaten by Ar- nold, Schuyler, and Morgan, surrendered to Gates with all his army. During the winter of 1777-78 Colonel Ludington was chiefly busied with other features of his public duties, and appeared little in the field. He was a valuable adviser to the State government on military affairs, and, realizing from experience the great diffi- culty of maintaining a satisfactory militia service in time of actual warfare, urged the formation of an- other regiment of regulars. On December 18, Gov- ernor Clinton referred to this project in a letter to General Putnam. He urged the necessity of strengthening the defenses of the Hudson River, and said that he expected the Committee of Safety at Poughkeepsie in a few days. He would then lay be- fore them the proposal for a new regiment of reg- ulars and added, "I should be glad to have Colo. Lud- ington's Plan." That winter, the winter of Valley Forge, was a hard one in which to raise recruits of [10611 THE REVOLUTION any kind, especially in view of the fact that the troops had received no pay for their services for a long time past. Colonel Ludington felt this keenly, and on being asked by Clinton to furnish a certain number of men from his regiment for the new regiment of regulars, he wrote very frankly on the subject: Honoured Sir, I am under the Disagrable Nesesity of acqainting you, that I find it to Be out of my power to Comply with your Orders in Regard of Raising the Coto (Quota) of men aloted me to Raise out of my Regiment, and that for Sundry Reasons. In the first place, the money Raised in the other Regments By their asesments amounts to one Hundread pounds Bounty to Each Soldier By Reason of the Ex- empts Being able and among whom are a number of Quakers. But it is not the Case in my Reg- ment, For, By the Best Computation we Can make, we Cannot Raise more than 30 Dolars a man, though I would not Be understood that we have gone through with the asesments and that for this Reason: the act for asesing the Exempts Expresly says that the officers who aseses the Exempts Shall Be Freeholders, and I have not Such an officer in my Regiment. We have met Sundry times in order to try to Raise the men and I yoused my Best Endevours that they Should Be Raised, But I have not an officer that will asist the Exempts. The officers tell me they posatively will not Call their Companies out until they get pay for their Past Servises in order to avoid Service; on that account I have had their pay roles maid up in time and Signed By the gen- mo7] HENRY LUDINGTON eral, and Have weighted on the pay master for the money Everry few Days, and yesterday for the Last time, and He then told He had no pros- pect in geting the money in Sum months. That Being the Case I am Sory I must Tell your Hon- our that I know not what further measures to take until I have Sum further instructions in Re- gard of the matter. It is my opinion that we Shall never Raise the men, unles the State asists us in Raising a part of the Bounty and the Sol- diers gets their wages for their past Servises. Sir, a few lines from your Honour in Regard of the above, By way of instructions, will mutch ob- lige your Humble Servant, Henry Ludinton. Fredricksburgh February 20th 1778. To His Excelency George Clinton Esqr. Gov- ernor. P. S. Sir, if there Be a late act past in Regard of Raising the men and a Bounty for them, please to Convey the Same as I have Had no opportu- nity of acquainting my Self with it. The Returns of the Regment you Shall Have next week, which Should Have Had Before now, Had it not Been for the neglect of sum of the Captains not sending in their Returns. Colonel Ludington had, however, rather better success in holding his own regiment together than did some other colonels of militia, as the following return shows : C108] THE REVOLUTION Return of the Regiment of Militia of the County of Dutchess and State of New York. Command'd by Collonel Henry Ludinton. Fredricksburgh Precinct March 23rd 1778. Field Comm'd Staff Non Officers. Officers. Officers. Comm'd. COMPANIES. 1> a o o O "o O 3 V o 'c? 09 a "8 4-> & U to 4-> t V 3 CO C .SP "co C w 3 c o e3 CO 4-> c a CD bD >-. V CO CO u 'a 3 Q 4> a 3 J* c John Crane's 1 2 4 1 60 David Waterbury's 1 2 1 4 1 57 John Haight's 1 2 1 3 51 Hezekiah Meed's 1 2 1 4 1 74 George Lane's 1 — 1 4 49 Nathaniel Scribner's 1 2 1 4 2 58 Joel Meed's 1 2 1 3 1 72 Total Strength of the Regiment 7 12 6 26 6 421 Colonel Ludington and his regiment were again called to the defense of the Hudson at Fishkill in June, 1779, on the alarm caused by the British seizure of Verplanck's Point, and a few days later returned to the vicinity of Crom Pond to resume the local police work which formed so large a part of their duties. There, before daylight of June 24, they were surprised by an attack of about two hundred British cavalry, which had made a dash all the way up from New York. Nearly thirty of the militia were killed and wounded in the sharp skirmish which ensued. At the same time 130 British light infantry C109H HENRY LUDINGTON came across from Verplanck's Point and made a de- monstration in aid of the cavalry. On another occa- sion a similar attack was made while the Americans were at breakfast, close by the church, which at the time was used as an arsenal. After these services the regiment was marched home to Fredericksburgh and for a time disbanded. On this occasion Colonel Ludington wrote to Clinton as follows : Honoured Sir, I embrace this opportunity of acquainting you that according to Colo. Swart- wout's orders to me of Yesterday I thought Proper to discharge my Regt who I must beg leave to acquaint you have acted with the greatest Spirrit since they have been hear and have gon home with a full determination to turn out at a minute's warning. In my last I wrote you to know the mode adopted for Punishing those who have not turned out according to their being Warned, for I am highly sensible that if they are not brought to a sevear Punishment it will give offence to those Who have dun their Dutey. I must allso Return your Excellency thanks for Recommending to me Mr. McClennen who has truley answered the Character I have had of him as I have Experienced his services in Spiriting the Militia in these Parts and my Regt in Par- ticular. I remain in the mean time with Respect your Excellencys most obedient Humble Servt Henry Ludinton. Fredh Burgh Juley 11, 1779. To Governor Clinton. CllOU THE REVOLUTION Later in the same year a radical reorganization of the militia forces was effected under the following orders : Poughkeepsie Oct. 11th, 1779. Brigade Orders. Agreeable to General Orders of the 10th In- stant issued by his Excellency the Govr., 1078 Men, including Non Commissioned Officers, drums and fifes, are to be Detached out of Colo. Comdt. Swartwout's Brigade of Militia to Con- tinue in Service for the term of three Months un- less the particular service for which they are drawn out shall be sooner Completed. The Detachments from the several Regiments in this Brigade to be as follows, viz. — From Colo. Graham's Regt 196 Men Colo. Frear's do 156 Colo. Hopkins do 192 Colo. Field's do 117 Colo. Luddenton's do 144 Colo. Van Der Burgh's do . . . . 118 Colo. Brinckerhoff's do 155 Total 1078 The above Detachment to be formed into Two Regiments under Command of Colos. Graham and Hopkins, in the following manner, viz., The Detachments of Colos. Graham's, Frear's, Van Der Burgh's and 69 Men of Colo. Field's Regiments to be formed into one Regiment un- der Command of Colo. Graham. The Detachments of Colos. Hopkins, Ludden- ton's, Brinckerhoff's, and 48 Men of Colo. Field's HENRY LUDINGTON Regts. to be formed into another Regiment under Command of Colo. Hopkins. Colo. Graham's Field Officers to be Lieut. Colo. Birdsall and Majr. Hill, Captains Andw. Heermans James Wilson Hustid Lemuel Conklin Hugh Van Kleeck Israel Vail Colo. Graham's Regt. Colo. Frear's Regt. Colo. Van Der Burgh's Regt. Pierce Colo. Field's Regt. Colo. Hopkins Field Officers are Lieut, and Majr. Paine. Captains Wheeler Waters Talmadge Colo. Hopkins Regt. Geo. Brinckerhoff Colo. Brinckerhoff 's Jno. Van Bunschoten Regt. Barnum Colo. Field's Regt. ciisn Subalterns. John Seton Andw. Heermans Junr. John Wilson Jonathan Darling and Montgomery Weeks Hendrickson Van Der Bogart Tredwell Bently Hall Elliot Colo. Griffen Subalterns. Wm. Chamberlain Elijah Parks Elliot Parley Jonas Parks Hoskin Christian Dubois Abraham Shults William Swartwout Abraham Hoogland Chandler THE REVOLUTION Colo. Luddenton and his officers being absent, he will with advice of his field officers nominate and furnish one Captain and Three Subalterns, to join Colo. Hopkins Regt. The above Detachments to be Compleated and at the place of Rendevous without Delay, Com- pleatly Equipped, Agreeable to Genl. Orders, to which the most strictest attention is to be paid. By Order of Colo. Comdr. Jac. Swartwout Hend. Wyckoff MB Thereafter Colonel Ludington and his regiment were frequently engaged in important work, espe- cially during the time of doubt and dread caused by the treason of Arnold, and in the operations pre- liminary to Washington's epoch-making march from the Hudson to the Chesapeake. But those services belonged to the other phases of public duty to which reference has been made and of which fuller con- sideration must be reserved for another chapter. CH33 CHAPTER V SECRET SERVICE ANOTHER part of Henry Ludington's services h to his country during the Revolution was in- timately connected with that little known under- world of the Secret Service — the men who take their lives in their hands perhaps more perilously than the soldier in the open field, who have no stimulus of martial glory, who receive no public recognition, and whose very names are doomed to obscurity. A recent work of fiction, one of the best "historical novels" of our day — "The Reckoning," by Mr. Robert W. Chambers — gives a singularly dramatic and con- vincing picture of the work of a Patriot spy in New York City in the Revolution, doing work which was hateful to him and yet which was of the highest im- portance to Washington himself. It is a picture as true as it is graphic. An earlier work dealing with the same phase of Patriot service, "The Spy," of Fenimore Cooper, has long been familiar to the American public, and it has generally been assumed that its hero, "Harvey Birch," was an actual char- acter, drawn from life; even more closely than the genius of "The Pilot" was drawn from the illustrious Paul Jones. Such indeed was the case, and with the 3 ~£ vC>^ - 'O^/^Ac ^£.:. ?~~- y£— ^ *S)»#k ,Jy6:4