I LIFE OF SIR PHILIP SIDNEY. THE LIFE OF SIR PHILIP SIDNEY. BY JULIUS LLOYD, M.A. : His life was gentle ; and the elements So mixed in him, that Nature might ftand up, And fay to all the world, ' This was a man.' " LONDON: LONGMAN, GREEN, LONGMAN, ROBERTS, AND GREEN. 1862. The Right of Translation is referred. PREFACE. //U 3? HORT Memoirs of Sir Philip Sidney are numerous ; but his admirable character, no lefs than his great fame, demands a fuller account of his life. This was undertaken by Southey in 1804, as appears from his Diary. Unhappily, Southey never com- pleted his biography. In 1808, Dr. Zouch publifhed, in a quarto volume, a mafs of inter- esting particulars about Sidney. As a memoir, however, Zouch's book is by no means fatisfac- tory; and fince it was written, much light has been thrown on the times of Elizabeth. The letters edited by Wright, Ellis, Murdin, Bruce, Gray, and Pears have been of eflential fervice in vi Preface. the composition of the prefent work. Mr. Mot- ley's Hiftory of the Netherlands is not only valuable for its learned and pi&urefque exposition of European politics, but alfo contains fome curi- ous notices of Sidney from unpublished fources. In addition to thefe, I have found feveral new facts by confulting the MSS. preferred, at the State Paper Office, with the courteous affiftance which is given to Students there. Where it has appeared to be requisite, I have cited authorities. But the following books have been fo constantly in my hands, that it would be fuperfluous to have referred to them in ordinary cafes : — The Life of the renowned Sir Philip Sidney, by Sir Fulke Greville, Lord Brooke (edition of 1652). The Sidney Papers, edited, with Memoirs, by Arthur Collins, 2 vols. 1746. Sir P. Sidney's Mifcellaneous Works, edited, with a Life, by Wm. Gray. Oxford, 1829. Sidney's Cor- refpondence withLanguet, translated and edited by Steuart A. Pears, D.D. Lond. 1845. Dr. Pears has added an excellent biographical preface. Preface. vii Several portraits of Sidney are in the pofTeflion of Lord De L'Ifle at Penfhurft, Among the pictures at Warwick Cattle is a beautiful head of Sidney, which was the property of the firft Lord Brooke. The Woburn picture is well known from the engraving in Lodge and Harding's col- lection. Other portraits are enumerated by corre- fpondentsof "Notes andQueries," March 12,1859, and Oct. 20, i860. The engraving prefixed to Zouch's Memoirs is altogether a blunder. It is probably neither a likenefs of Sidney, nor a picture by Velafquez, who was born after Sidney's death. During the progrefs of this volume through the prefs, its publication has been anticipated by that of a copious Memoir of Sir Philip Sidney by Mr. H. R. Fox Bourne. The greater part of the following pages were printed before I faw Mr. Bourne's work. In the laft three chapters it has afTifted me to avoid fome inaccuracies, and fup- plied a few additions, which are printed in the notes. I am indebted to him for the name of Wil- liam Wentworth, Burleigh's fon-in-law, referred viii Preface, to (p. 138) in a letter of Sidney's, which, as I fhould have ftated, is taken from Murdin's Burghley Papers, together with thofe in pp. 135 and 137. It appears (Bourne, p. 27) that Sidney went to Oxford in his fourteenth year, a year earlier than I have ftated on Dr. Zouch's authority. I have been able to prove, from the MS. correfpondence of the French AmbarTador, the correclnefs of Mr. Bourne's furmife that Sidney's miflion to Paris in 1584 was not carried out, and alfo tol give the reafons why it was revoked: fee p. 155. The dates at which Sidney's works were com- pofed are far more uncertain than would appear from Mr. Bourne's Memoir. In placing them I have partly relied on internal evidence, partly on the opinions of Sidney's editors. The early date 1580, afligned to the "Defence of Poefy," may be fuftained by feveral arguments ; the youthful vivacity of the ftyle, the flight, almoft apologetic, commendation of Spenfer ; but more particularly, the appearance, in 1579, of the attack on poetry Preface. ix by Go (Ton, of which Sidney refufed the dedication : fee p. 6$. Since I have read Mr. Bourne's account of "Aftrophel and Stella," I fee more than ever how arbitrary and infecure is the critical procefs of educing facts from the fcattered verfes of a deceafed poet, efpecially when printed, as thefe were, without fo much as a friendly editor to arrange them. Mr. Collier has mown, in his ~,ife of Spenfer, lately publifhed, that " Aftrophel and Stella" was printed furreptitioufly by Thomas Nam, in 1 591. The conclusions which I have drawn from Sidney's Poems are fubmitted with diffidence and, as far as poffible, fultained by direct proofs. Mr. Bourne has fallen into a ferious error as to the date of Lady Penelope Devereux's marriage. The letter on which he relies (p. 286), in correction of the common date 158 1, proves his own miftake. I find, by refer- ence to the MS. (Brit. Mus. Lanfdowne MS. xxxi. 40), that he has not taken his ufual care to x Preface, rectify the year according to the modern calendar, the letter being written on the ioth of March. This error is the more grave that Mr. Bourne's eftimate of Sidney's moral character depends upon it. Here and there Mr. Bourne has allowed himfelf too great a freedom of paraphrafe. For inftance (pp. 144, 145), he has put an oration into Sidney's mouth without any fufficient autho- rity. The words are bafed on Lord Brooke's, who gives the fubftance of Sidney's arguments, not to the Emperor, but to the lefTer German Princes, as is evident from an allufion to Auftrian fupremacy (Brooke, p. 50). Again (p. 343), it is too much to afTert that Sidney " determined to retain only fuch parts of" the Arcadia,