E 231 .H95 Copy 1 SIEGE — OF — THE FORT OF ST. JOHNS In 1775. ir Written in French by Lucien Huot, and translated by Geo. H. Flint. :ililW.mL^^^ yr,!,^;,^^^ House, St. Johns, P. Q. ' \ sip m m t» OF gf . MP IN 177S. Written in French by Lucien Huot and Translated. Ibrf Geo. H. Flint. Last year, while digging at the mouth of a little creek vv'hich runs through the farm where my family spend the holidays, and in clearing the shore of the Richelieu River at the junction of the two streams in order to make a dock worthy of the steam yacht " La Mouche," I found some very interesting relics at a depth of two or three feet. The first was an unexploded iron shell, the wooden stopper still in its place. Then I turned up other iron missiles of different sizes, — a blunderbuss, bar shot, grape shot, &c., and also a horse shoe and stirrup, all in a perfect state of preservation. To whom had these things belonged was a natural question. Were they left there during the French regime or at a more recent date ? The rust which had formed on them and the thickness of the soil which had accumulated over them seemed to indicate that many years had passed since they had found this resting place. Had these missiles been nred by the garrison of the fort while practising? Had the stirrup and horse shoe belonged to an officer who had lost them while hunting, or to some young man of the time, who, returning late on a dark night from a visit to a fair friend, had, on arriving at the creek, taken a leap beyond his horse's power and landed deep in the mire? Or had this been the scene of one of the battles so frequent in ihose early days as the presence of these many articles ivould seem to indicate ? Although of military descent, my military education is very limited and J know but little about materials of war. The position of an army many years ago cannot be located definitely by the discovery of cannon and musket balls at the present, neither can the age or nationality of those who fired them be definitely determined by their shape and size, because at one time the French and the English used their enemy's mj -2.— I arms whenever they chanced to lay hold of them. The h^rse shoe; however, is more within the scope of my scientific knowledge, and II confess that it is my opinion it never shod a farm horse. This is easily, seen by its lines. Whether the blacksmith who forged it was French, English or American, and whatever the century in which he lived, he: deserves the credit which is the due of a good workman. Since the foundation of the colony, St. Johns has always been^ important from a military point of view. Here the French built a fort to defend the possession of the Richelieu against attacks by way of Lake Champlain, this river at that time forming the route of commu- nication between Montreal and the neighboring country, THE FIRST FORT. According to Garneau, the historian, the first fort was built in 1665, by order of M. De Tracy, the Governor of the Colony, simul-l taneously with that of Chambly and several others. The plan of this first fort, a draft of which is in the Parliamentary Library at Ottawa^i indicates that it was roomy and elegant in construction, the four angles being formed by bastions several storeys high, with pinnacles,; which must'have given it a very fine appearance, The trenches whichi surround the present military school would therefore date from that time — more than two hundred years ago. J Although St. Johns was the first outpost erected to guard th^ colony of Montreal against an attack from that direction, the historyj does not mention that any important fight ever took place under its walls during the period of continuous v/ar between the French and English. It was the rendez-vous for all the expeditions to Lake Ghann plain and Lake George. It was well situated for the purpose. Stand-i ing at the head of the Chambly rapids, where the navigation of LakQ Champlain, at least for war boats, ended, at a time when the waters o^ that lake were constantly furrowed by important naval forces, St. Johns formed the south angle of a triangle completed by Chambly and La-i prairie, which had to be crossed before the French colony could be^ entered and Montreal attacked. (*) ) BEFORE AND SINCE THE CONQUEST. A military force of more or less importance, therefore, had alwayif been stationed in St. Johns up to the time of the conquest. But as nc>| important engagement took place during that period it is not probable! that the shell and balls found by me could be traced to it. If I anl not mistaken target shooting was not as fashionable then as it is toj day. The battle fields afforded sufficient practice, and, moreover, th^ scarcity of ammunition, especially for the artillery, made it necessarji for it to be kept in reserve for an enemy. I had, therefore, to come to the conclusion that the missiles Ij • had found dated from the siege of the fort of St. Johns by Montgomery; (*) At that time the whole sheet of water as far as St. Johns was called th Walpole, in his memoirs, tlius speaks of it : " The 6th was memorable for the chef d'ocuvre nt Burke's orations He called Burgoyne's talk with the Indians ' th^ Rubliraity of bombastic absurdity,' in which he demanded the assistance of seventeen Indian nations by considerations of our holy religion, by regard for our constitution ; and though he enjoined tliem not to scalp men, women or children alive, he promised to pay them for any scalps of the dead ; but, added Burke, the invitation was just as if at a riot on Tower Hill,— the keeper of the wild beasts had turaed them looi^e with this advice: My gentle lions, iny sentimental wolves, my tender-hearted hyenas, go forth, but lake care not to hurt men, women or children. He tlien grew serious, and as the former part had excited the warmest and most continued bursts of laughter even from LordNorth, Rigby, and the ministers themselves, so he drew such a pathetic picture of the erutlty of the King's army, particularly in the case of a young woman whose ran- —17.— This faithful lieutenant was probably a member of one of those families of the same name which still reside in the locality. If not a member of the Jones family that owns the bridge connecting Iberville with St. Johns, possibly then a member of that other family of Jones living in Sabrevois. We could scarcely realize to-day, when visiting the pretty towns of Vermont, and admiring the long floating hair, carelessly worn by the young American girls, that hardly a hundred years ago, more than one equally beautiful and attractive were scalped for the sake of their hair, while others were taken prisoners to be sold like slaves. Those expeditions which had for their object the destruction of the villages on both sides of the frontier, were often made the excuse of all sorts of atrocities, the Indians who accompanied the marauders often bursting from all restraint and acting in the most barbaious manner. It is reported that in 1677 two ladies of good society from the village of Hartford — Mrs. Wait and Mrs. Jennings — were captured by Indians who brought them to Chambly and swapped them for some rum. It was only in the following winter that their husbands suc- ceeded in tracing them and obtained their liberty for the ransom of £200. These facts show conclusively the immense improvement v/hich this part of the country has undergone since that period. The town of St. Johns, in spite of the immense drawback caused by the fire of 1876, has within a period of a little over fifty years, grown to be a town of much importance, and there is no reason why the progress of the next fifty years will not compare favorably with that of the first half of the century. This town, now that it has ceased to be an outpost of military strategy, occupies a most favorable situ- ation for trade and commerce with our neighbors of the United States. The most friendly feeling exists between the people of the two coun- tries, and instead of war and bloodshed, which characterized its ear- lier history, there is a constant display of kindliness and mutual res- pect, and it is to be hoped that such scenes of animosity and strife which we have faintly but faithfully endeavored to describe have jjassed away forever. The only reminiscence of a military character which still has a place in St. Johns is the well-conducted military school which has taken the place of the fortress. Beautiful lawns and flower gardens now occupy the place formerly occupied by masked batteries and glit- tering bayonets, and, thanks to the improved civilization of the nine- teenth century, we can quietly rusticate outside of its walls without danger of being scalped. We can also find our way inside of the fortress without fear of being taken prisoner. The proverbial hospitality of the Commandant and Madame d'Orsonnens, and the courtesy of the officers, make the visitors forget som (not beauty) they quarreled over and murdered her, that he drew iron tears down Barre's cheek, who implored him. to print his speecb, and said, witli many invectives against the Bishops, that it ought to be pasted In every church under their proclamation for the fast, and that he himself would paste it upon some." —18.— that these are military quarters ; or if we do not forget the purpose for which the school is established, we are deeply indebted to them for the efforts which are made to enliven the place and to add to its enjoyment. An open-air band concert every Thursday evening in summer brings crowds of listeners in boats silently gliding on the river, and reminding us in some small degree of Venetian scenes. With all the attractions and advantages, therefore, which St. Johns possesses; we can form but a very faint idea of what it may yet be- come ; and while in the last century such great advances have been made, may we not anticipate that (in constquence of the accelerated progress which is now being made in every depariment of human en- terprise and skill) a far more rapid proi)ortionate advance may char- acterize its history during the next hundred years to come. The present civic administration under the presidency of Mayor McDonald seems to encourage energetic action in the way of public improvements, and if the citizens would second these efforts, and take advantage of circumstances, there is no doubt whatever that St. Johns would become not only an important town in a business point of view, but also a centre of attraction equal, if not superior, to any of the charming American towns which border on Lake Champlain. After writing the foregoing, I discovered that I had made an error which it is important that I should rectify. Contrary to what is stated in Garneau's history, the first fort of St. Johns was not built in 1665, but in 1748 by order of M. De La Galissonniere, at the time Governor of Canada, and under the direc- tion of Sieur De Lery, jr., engineer of the works. It was the fort of St. Therese which was built in 1665, and in the same year the forts of Chambly and Sorel. This fort of St. Therese was at the head of St. Therese rapids, about three leagues above Chambly and about one league below St. Johns. This fort was demolished in 1747 and the materials used in building the fort of St. Johns, which was placed at the head of the St. Johns rapids. Tiie road from Laprairie to St. Johns was then constructed and by it the distance between Montreal and Lake Champlain was con- siderably shortened and the portages of the rapids of Chambly, Saint Therese and St. Johns avoided. I am indebted for these new details to Rev. Mr. Verreau, who obligingly pointed out to me in his rich library, the " Historical Documents of the State of New York," published by E. B. O'Callaghan at Albany in 1858. In that publica- tion there is a report of Mr. De LaGallissonniere and Intendent Bigot on the construction of the fort. It is stated in that report that the total cost of construction was fifty thousand francs, although each load of earth only cost a penny, " two sous." It was in the month of August 1852 that the French Government —19.— engineer, Franquet, visited this fort then under the command of M. D'Artigny. Those who take an interest in the history of our country stand very much indebted to the Rev. M. Verreau for the information he is enabled to impart. It is from his work, " Invasion du Canada," that I have gathered the details cf this narrative of the siege of the fort of St. Johns, and with his permission I have copied from that work the journal kept by Foucher, one of the volunteers defending the fort. This journal, inserted in " Sanguinet's " manuscript without ac- knowledgement of the writer, leaves some doubt as to its origin. However, it seems well established that " Foucher," a notary of Montreal and one of the volunteers defending the fort, kept during the siege a journal of the principal events connected with it. As there is no other manuscript in existence which can possibly be attributed to him, and as some subsequent historians have made reference to it as his, there can be but little doubt about its authorship. Mr. R. Bellemare, who was an intimate friend of Mr. Jacques Viger, to whom we are indebted for the preservation of the manuscripts of that period, seems well disposed to adopt this theory, and Rev. Mr. Verreau himself does not hesitate to admit that it is a very pro- bable one. My friend Mr. Joseph Desrosiers, who has an inquisitive disposition, has not been able to add to my information on this sub- ject. I am also indebted to Hon. Mr. Marchand and Mr. Walmsley of St. Johns for many details of the past, which have aided me very much in tracing the different localities mentioned, also the situation of the army. The co-temporary memoirs of the time are, in many places, ambigious and often contradictory, and therefore the recent investiga- tions from reliable sources are the more valuable. Mr. Marchand has contributed to the columns of the Fra?ico-Canadien a short but very interesting article on the siege of the fort. I must confess that in addition to the above sources of informa- tion I have old family papers, dating from the time of the siege, which stimulated my curiosity, and contributed largely to the pleasure of tracing these events. Among these papers are letters addressed by officers of Montgomery to Colonel Dumont of Quebec, my great grand- father. When Governor General Guy Carleton decided to rebuild the fort of St. Johns, he also resolved to re-organize the old militia, and for this purpose he appointed two colonels, one for the district of Quebec, Colonel Dumont, and one for the district of Montreal, Colonel De Rouville. Neither of these would accept the position and the militia was not then re-organized. Our ancestors, although well dis- posed individually to place their services at the disposal of the King of England, w^ould not, however, compromise their nationality in a civil conflict with which they had nothing to do. This Colonel J. Bte. Dumont, who was a rich merchant of Que- bec, had his residence on the plains of Abraham, precisely where Montgomery encamped with his army during the siege of the city. —20.— This residence was taken possession of by the Americans and used as their military hospital. After the siege the Briti'^h troops set fire to it and destroyed it. The old Colonel himself being looked upon in a suspicious v/ay by the authorities, since he refused to accept a com- mission in the army, was imprisoned, and died shortly after his release. His early demise was due to the grief caused by such unjust treat- ment, and his family left the district of Quebec soon afterwards. I gather these facts from several letters to Colonel Dumont, among others one from Colonel Van Ness, of General Wooster'sarmy, under date of June 1776, one from Hon. James Livinglon dated Jan- uary 6th 1797, and one from Hon. E. Gerry, an ex-member of Con- gress, dated Cambridge, April 13th 1807. It was the grand son of this Colonel Dumont, Lieutenant-Colonel A. Montaigne Dumont, who was at Chateauguay under DeSalaberry, as Captain of the 2nd regiment of Vercheres, of which regiment he was afterwards Lieutenant-Colonel. This time again, at Chateauguay, the sentiment of duty was stronger than that of national feeling. He died leaving no heirs but the children of his sister who had married my grandfather at Chambly. — ^^■•♦••-BssJ FOUCHER'S JOURNAL. SIEGE OF THE FORTIFICA TION AT ST. JOHNS BY THE BOSTONIANS IN 1775. Sept. i8th. — The Bostonians arrived at St. Johns in tv/o sloops and barges, numbering about one thousand men. ISlajor Preston, who commanded this fort, sent on the same day about thirty men of the Canadian troops to bring in the cattle which was in the bush near St. Johns. Soon after he was informed by a Canadian that there were two or three hundred Bostonians on the other side of a bridge about half a league from St. Johns, who were raising fortifications and who had taken four cart loads of provisions which were on their way to St. Johns, and also the cattle he had sent for ; and that the bridge was already demolished, so that communication between St. Johns and La Prairie de la Magdeleine was cut off by the enemy. Imme- diately Major Preston ordered out one hundred men under command of Captain Strong, together with one hundred Canadian volunteers and a piece of artillery to feel the enemy. This detachment advanced and the Bostonians fired upon them. The fire was brisk on both sides and lasted about half an hour. The enemy left the battle field and was pursued for some distance. The Srs. Moses Plazen and Toker, and also Hazen's servant, who were within the enemy's line, were made prisoners and brought to the fort. Beaubien, Desauniers, a Canadian volunteer, and a soldier of the 26th regiment were shot j another soldier was dangerously wounded. During this action the artillery of the fort and of the gun boat, continued to fire for three hours ; the enemy kept up the fire in return; but the above mentioned were the only casualities on our side. Sept. 19th. — On the nineteenth the Sieur Monin with two Cana- dian volunteers were sent on a scouting expedition along the south side of the river, but they did not see anything. Sept. 20th. — On the twentieth, two of the enemy's boats were carried by the current past the forth on the south side of the river. A cannon and some musketry shots were fired at them, and on a party being sent out, they were secured and found to contain five barrels of pork, one barrel of flour, one barrel of biscuits, and one man who was asleep and only awoke when the shots were fired. This man gave the information that in the fight at the bridge on the eighteenth, seven of their men had been killed and seven wounded. He stated that their force consisted of seven hundred men in the camp, who were fortifying their position and erecting batteries for the purpose of storming the fort. He said also that they had three mortars and six pieces of cannon. Sept. 22nd. — On the twenty-second a deserter from the enemy —22— came to the fort, carrying his rifle on his back, and informed us that the enemy were building a battery on a big point, that their entire force consisted of three hundred men in the camp, five hundred block- ading our fortiftcatins, and two hundred spread over the country — in all one thousand men. He also gave the information that they were short of provisions, that he was the first deserter, but that before long there would be a good many more. Immediately after his arrival we kept up a cannonade on our side for over an hour. At four o'clock in the afternoon all the Canadian volunteers were sent to pull down three houses near the first fort, to prevent the enemy seeking shelter behind them, and while some were working at the buildings, others were watching in the bush to prevent surprise or attack. Sixty soldiers were sent to Moses Hazen's house on the south of the river to take his sheep for the use of the forts. Hazen's servant who, with his master had been taken prisoner on the eighteenth, was sent with the party to show where the sheep were, but he deserted to the Bostonians and the party came back without the sheep, no one being willing to point out where they were. They brought into the fort Hazen's farmer, his wife and their son. The two forts kept up a fire on the enemy during the whole time. Sept. 23rd. — On the twenty-third, a second Bostonian deserter arrived, who stated that dysentery was raging among their men and thinning their ranks ; that they saw no more Canadians nor Indians with them, that however once in a while, some one would come out of curiosity, who returned immediately, and that none of them would take arms in their favor. He stated also that Montgomery was about to attack our fortifications, which he thought were single, not double, as they were ; that several Bostonians talked of deserting and that M, Montgomery had given it out that Major Preston had given orders to hang all the deserters who made an appearance. This day a good many bomb-shells and cannon balls were fired at the enemy. M. Macka>e and several voluntreers with fifteen soldiers were posted as guards at the skirting of the bush, to facilitate the transfer in boats of the materials of several houses which had been demolished, in order to form a line of communication between the two' forts. During this time two women were seen in a canoe who apparently had some diffi- culty in landing at the fort. Five men having been sent in a boat to assist them, they proved to be two women who were living at Mr. Hazen's, where the Bostonians had gone and taken possession of all the cattle. Mr. Hazen was sent to Montreal under the charge of Che- valier de Lorimier, the former pledging his word of honor and giving a lien on all his property that he would give satisfactory reasons to General Carleton for having been found with the Bostonians in the encounter of the eighteenth. In reply to our cannon the Bostonians fired several volleys at the observatory boat, which returned the com- pliment with its twelve pounder. They also aimed two pieces of can- non at the schooner. The first shot carried away a spar and split a piece of the mast; the second shot broke its shackles and the third stove a hole in its waist four feet from the front. The boat imme- —23— diately withdrew to the shore ; the enemy witnessing its confusion shouted " hurrah " five or six times. Sept. 26th. — -On the twenty-sixth, a Bostonian deserter arrived at the fort, giving us the information tha: only six hundred men were left in the camp, including two companies of seventy men each from New York which had joined the camp two days before ; that they had only a few bomb-shells left, and these not of the same size as the mortars ; that the water was knee deep in the camp ; that the invad- ing force suffered great hardships, having no blankets to cover them ; that Montgomery had received a letter from Congress requesting him to make haste if he saw his way to do something, and if not to give up the enterprise. He assured us also that the Bostonians had suffered much from our bomb-shells ; that on the day before lie left, the alarm was so great in the camp that the whole force withdrew into the woods, leaving no one to take charge of the artillery during the night, and that in consequence the captain of artillery was taken to the guard room and locked up prisoner. Sept. 27. — On the twenty-seventh several cannon balls and bombs were fired at the enemy who replied with vivacity. We had a soldier of the 26th regiment wounded. Sept. 28th. — On the twenty-eighth, two more deserters came in who reported that Montgomery was stopping at the Big Point, that' the battery firing at us only contained two pieces of cannon and two mortars ; that there were only two cannons on each of their sloops and each of their floating batteries. He also said that Montgomery had sent seventeen boats to bring provisions from the " Grand Point" and a big mortar from Carillon. He gave the news that Allen, with a portion of his party, had been made prisoner at Long Point, near Montreal, by the gentlemen of the city, aad had been locked up a prisoner of war. The same day, the 28th, at ten o'clock six Indians arrived without arms, a little in liquor, who confirmed the report about the capture of Captain Allen with a portion of his party. Oct. ist. — On the first of October the enemy fired a large num- ber of cannon balls and bombs at the two forts. Two Indians came in who soon after went away. Oct. 2nd. — On the second October our rations were reduced to one-half. During the night, the noise of several boats of the enemy were heard, and notwithstanding that a close watch was kept, two of them succeeded in passing the fort without being seen. Oct. 4th. — On the fourth several Bostonians were noticed on the south side of the river near Moses Hazen's house. _ Several cannon shots were fired at them, to which the enemy replied in the same way. At about five o'clock, Mr. Monin, a distinguished officer, left the fort to bring in eight or ten cows which had made their appearance near the bush. He succeeded in bringing in six of them, in spite of the shots from the enemy.which he avoided by a tumbling march. The sieur Moquin, a volunteer, went for the two others which greatly re- plenished our stock of provisions. —24— Oct. 5th. — On the fifth, two cows left the enemy's camp and came in a straight line to join the others which had been caught. The same night, v/ith the consent of Major Preston, a man named Chenier and two Leducs left the fort to carry news to General Carle ton. Oct. 6th. — On the sixth nothing important occurred. Oct. 9th. — On the ninth of October, Mr. Mackaye with Mr. Mo- nin and twenty Canadian volunteers were sent as scouts towards Mr. Montgomery's camp to capture some prisoners. They discovered a party of eight enemies under shelter. A short fight followed in which some Bostonians were killed and one made prisoner. He reported that the deserters who had left our forts on the 27th September and on the 7th inst., were prisoners in the enemy's camp. He assured us there was only one thousand Bostonians in their several camps in- cluding the forces scattered over the country on the south side, with some Canadians, as well as those who were at the breast works near Mr. Hazen's house. During the night Major Preston sent Mr. Ri- cherville and the sieur Leduc to carry a letter to General Guy Carle- ton at Montreal and inform him of the state ailairs at the fort of St. Johns. Oct. loth. — On the tenth the enemy fired considerably and des- patched nineteen boats loaded with two hundred sick men together v/ith a Colonel to Grand Point. Oct. iolh-i4th. — From the tenth to the fourteenth nothing extra- ordinary occurred except much firing on both sides. Mr. Freeman, lieutenant in 7th regiment, was struck with a cannon ball in his back v/hich laid him dead in the middle of the yard. Oct. i4th-i7th. — P>om the fourteenth to the 17th, the fire con- tinued severe on both sides and the houses near our camp were much damaged. Messieurs Robertson, Rainville and Antoine Dupre left during the night to carry letters to General Guy Carleton. Oct. 20th. — On the twentieth Mr. Montgomery sent a messenger, accompanied by a drummer, to our fort to inform Major Preston that on the eighteenth of the present month the fort of Chambly had sur- rendered after a siege of a day and a half; the first day only one can- non having been fired at the fort and two the second half day, and that they had taken in the fort thirteen thousand two hundred pounds of ponder, fifty barrels of flour and the flags of the two regiments v.'hich were at St. Johns, without any loss of either killed or wounded on either side. The surrender of the fort under these circumstances was very extraordinary, the more especially as the fort itself had re- ceived no damage. The commandant of the fort of Chambly request- ed Major Preston to let ten boats pass in front of the forts to carry the garrison women and children who were made prisoners. This was granted on the condition that the boats would pass on the south side of the river. There was in the fort at Chambly when it suiren. dered, ten howitzers, five mortars, two four pounders and three hup. dred bomb-shells. It vv^as a matter of great surprise that the com. mandant should have surrendered without offering more resistance_ This day M. Lacorne, a Canadian ofiicer, died at half past four. Ra. —25— tions were brought down to half a pound of bread and a quarter pound of pork per man a day. Oct. 29th. — On the twenty-ninth of October Messieurs jMackayc and Monin, with twenty volunteers went out at day break towards the enemy's camp and captured one prisoner. He informed us that Gen- eral Guy Caile;on had attempted to cross over to Longueuil but had been repulsed, and that Mr. Montgomery, by the assistance of provi- sions, ammunition and artillery found in the fort at Chambly, expect- ed to take the fort of St. Johns in a short time. Nov. ist. — The fiie continued on both sides as usual, but on the first of November, at nine o'clock in the morning, the enemy unmask- ed another battery v.'hich had been concealed up to that time. This battery was built on the side below our forts and began a most violent cannonade, which lasted without any cessation until four o'clock in the afternoon. Eight hundred and fifty shots were fired by the enemy besides one hundred and twenty bombs. During this fire several of our men were wounded, after which 2vl. Montgomery sent a flag to our forts Vv^ith a man named Lacoste, a barber of Montreal, who had been taken prisoner in the Longueuil affair, bearing a letter to Major Preston, requiring him to surrender. The letter gave information of General Carletou's defeat, assuring Major Preston that he need not look for any assistance from that quarter and therefore to prevent the furdier effusion of blood, which a fruitless and obstinate defence would cause, he would recommend a surrender of the fort. Captain Stron returned with the flag to ask that hostilities should cease until to- morrow afternoon. Nov. 2nd. — On the second of November, Captain William of the artillery went to the enemy's camp with propositions of capitulation, and came back three hours after. With permission of Mr. Montgo- mery, Mr. Andre, lieutenant of the 7th regiment, went to the enemy's sloop accompanied by a drummer to ascertain from Sieur J. Bte. Des- pins, who also had been made prisoner at Longueuil, if what Lacoste had told Major Preston was true and the suspension of the arms was continued all day. In the evening Major Preston signed the capitu- lation with Mr. Montgomery. It was granted that some officers would be allowed to go to Montreal, to bring clothing for the prisoners. Consequently some officers of the regiment accompanied by Messieurs Hervieux and La Magdeleine started for that purpose. Nov. 3rd. — On the 3rd, at ten o'clock in the morning, the troops and the Canadians who were found in the fort were ordered to lay down their arms in presence of two companies of Bostonians, but the officers were allowed by General Montgomery to retain their swords. During the siege of St. Johns, which lasted forty-five days, there were only fourteen men killed or who died from their wounds, seven- teen or eighteen invalided and about sixty slightly wounded. End of Foucher's Journal. LUCIEN HUOT. :/^ .C-, -—f* LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 011 712 227 P # LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 011 712 227 A HoUing^r pH 8.5 Mai Run F03-2193