"b 4 o I'v %.*" "^ .*;^°' <^ -ftp .»i^to:* -^ v" .!.-»^ ^c>. -^^ ' V^^\/ "°^^^-^/ ^^,'^!^\/ %'-. o.^- ■So 4 o '" . » * .G^ \D 0^ -^ .^ V-^ ^^S *'>. O f ° " " » v:) s • • /. -^i. *> 11 PARTICULAR ACCOUNT BATTLE 3^-ttWifef ir<^ 0V Mm$Wu W^iUi 17TH OF JUNE, 1775. BY A CITIZEN OF BOSTON. Setoutu ISinttion. BOSTON : PUBLISHED BY CUMMINGS, HILLIARD, fy COMPANY. PRINTED BY MUNEOE AND FRANCIS. 1825. L . ";^^v \ \^ xiDVERTISEMENT. As there have been several accounts, heretofore given, of the Battle of Bunker Hill, it may be thought unnecessary again to bring the subject before the public, and impossible to say any thing of importance, not to be found in former nar- ratives. It may be observed, that some of those accounts have been found to be partial and incomplete ; and that some were written, not so much for the purpose of giving a correct view of all the events, as to establish particular facts, before denied or doubted. It has been suggested that a more particular yet brief statement of that enterprize would be acceptable to the public at this time. Inquiries are often made on the sub- ject, and are likely to be repeated, as a formal celebration of that ever-memorable event is soon to take place. The most correct and perfect account, which has been giv- en, was by Colonel S. Swett, by way of Appendix to a second edition of the Life of General Israel Putnam, pubhshed about seven years ago. The design of the writer of the fol- lowing narrative is to give a concise statement, and yet to record whatever is material and important. Having examined and compared all former accounts with dihgence, and received some addhional statements, he believes that it will not be con- sidered a mere republication of other and earlier accounts. He has confined himself to the transactions of the day and the event, with reference only to some circumstances closely con- nected therewith ; nor has he indulged in any remarks which belong more properly to the historian or to the orator. Boston, May 20th, 1825. BATTLE BUNKER OR BREED'S HILL. The battle in Charlestown, Massachusetts, which was fought between the British and Americans, on the 17th of June, 1775, was an event of great in- terest, and importance. It was the first real trial of strength and courage between the troops of the parent country and of the provinces. The affair at Lexing- ton and Concord, on the 19th of April preceding, could hardly be called a battle. Though a few guns were fired by the militia assembled under arms at Lexington, after they were attacked, yet no attempt was made by them to oppose the march of the Brit- ish, who were ten times more numerous.* And at * General Heath says, " The British advanced towards the militia, ordered them to disperse, huzzaed, and fired upon them. Several were killed and wounded, and tlie rest dispersed." Gordon says, " The huzzaing: and firing produced an immtdiate dispersion ; though some of the milita fired before, or as they were dispersing." The British account was, "that the militia, when ordered to disperse, immediately retire.! in confusion ; but that sev- eral guns were fired upon the king's troops from behind the stone wall ; by which one man was wounded, and Majer Pitcairn's horse was shot." Mrs. Warren says, " The British made an attack upon the defenceless peasants at Lexington — iliat Colonel Smith ordered them to lay down their arms and disperse ; at the same time ordered his troops to fire, and proceeded without molestation to Concord." Concord Bridge, where a part of the British troops was opposed with much spirit and bravery, there was nothing really deserving the name of ^^ o\- V-0^ ^^ ** ^^0^ >^ -^^ ^^v/^C,-^' • ' ^ * * V 4 > 5 • • '-^^ o V ^^^^^ r» -.^ > ^J" \. •'.'^ 'bV" ^^-n*. ^' .0 ■^* . ■* • .•^'\ "• '^o^ ■CL -^ -r " • » - ^- » ■