Class. Book. COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT ANALYTIC QUESTIONS THE ART OF SHAKESPEARE HAMLET •./^ BY hf At SHERMAN Professor of English Literature University of Nebraska , . ,M or co.v,: ; LINCDX-IT J. H. Miller, Publisher i8g5 ?^*"ve^^/^^/ TKzso .Ss Copyrighted, 1896, BY J. H. Miller. PRESS OF JACOB NORTH & COMPANY, LINCOLN, NEB. / yf INTRODUCTION. Many people suppose that, in order to interpret Shake- speare, it is necessary to learn new mental processes of some kind. Many other people believe that, to interpret Shake- speare, it is not necessary to learn any new mental processes or even to use the old ones very vigorously, since there is nothing in Shakespeare to interpret. Shakespeare, they say, is only what one puts into him; and Shakespeare is remarkable alone for his capacity to appropriate and seem to absorb all that his admirers, collectively and respectively, have endowed him with. Indeed, most of these would add, it is doubtful if there be any such thing as literary interpretation at all. Both these assumptions are distressingly and injuriously false. The one keeps many earnest minds from culture through fear of insuperable difificulties, the other helps render ignorance impreg- nable. To read Shakespeare requires no mastery of new princi- ples, but simply an adaptation or adjustment of processes used continually in outside life. Reading Shakespeare involves but the interpretation of partly hidden meanings, just as reading faces and motives and character among men. Shakespeare is only life reproduced and perpetuated in a book. What method of study will best forestall these wrong assump- tions, and make Shakespeare known, at least to such as are yet learners in our schools ? The first thing to be done is not to ety- mologize his language, or philologize his Elizabethan English. We must know the meanings of his words, but we do not need at once to learn the history of those meanings. That will not find the life in his pages, nor show us how he holds the mirror up to natui-e, nor make us understand the minds and characters that he has analyzed. To find out how he has analyzed them, and by what means he exhibits them to us, is to study Shakespeare's art. Whenever Shakespeare's art is discerned and his higher IV INTRODUCTION meaning compassed, the result is an immediate spiritual quick- ening. Students achieving this experience know there is such a thing as literary art, and teach others so. They are quickened also in the interpretation of motives and men and life without. Moreover, when a mind has been thus energized, there seems no question of its spiritual future. It goes on to higher and higher culture of its own momentum. But is it possible to teach the art of Shakespeare except to the favored few, — to those who would grasp it in any case? This little book is intended to serve as the answer to that question. It offers no method of sugar-coating literary study, or of invei- gling pupils into a liking for Shakespeare. It proposes genuine and sustained tasks from day to day, yet work that furnishes its own impetus and enthusiasm. The questions are but means by which to locate the principal art-points, and are so inductively multiplied as to bring all difficulties, it is believed, within the grasp of any diligent and aspiring mind. The foundation of art is emotional inference. Not that what we call logical inference is necessarily unemotional, or that emo- tional inferences are illogical. An emotional inference is a process of reasoning in which the conclusion is conceived and apprehended in that condition of mind which we call imagina- tion. For example, I met upon the street lately an old man, bowed and decrepit, wearing soiled and ragged clothing. He was holding in his mouth a black, short, clay pipe, and there was the smell of alcohol upon his breath. I was conscious of no effect thus far from the spectacle, except some degree of pity, and should quickly have forgotten all about it. But as I passed, the old man raised his head and let me see his face. He had most brilliant and expressive eyes, and most refined features, and I found myself at once picturing what a veritable Apollo he piust have been in his youth, and, instantly after, what he might have been to himself and to the world if he had escaped his vice. Here I was engaging in an act of inference, and with consider- able accompanying emotion, since the whole transaction was wrought in a state of imagination. It is by way of emotional in- ferences such as this that the deeper and intenser meanings of literature are appropriated. ART OF SHAKESPEARE V The usual way of indicating character, both in books and out- side of them, in common intercourse of people as well as in Shakespeare, is by presentation of certain consequences or effects of character, which shall be potential to imagination of the character itself. A single escapade or act may be so chosen as to be indicative not only of the special enabling trait, but also of the whole character permitting or producing it. It is not nec- essary, for example, to enumerate all or many proofs of a squalid home. To say that the mother washes the family linen on Sat- urday, or the dinner dishes in cold water after dark, is quite sufficient. Herein we shall note that effects of character are something more than what are ordinarily called signs. They make us not only discern the existence of some cause, but con- ceive in imagination other and more vital consequences as derived or derivable from that same cause. Character-effects, — sometimes in the following exercises called "effects" simply, are divided into two Classes, the first on the basis of their nature, the second with reference to their use. The first class is subdivided into "effects" of kind, and of degree. Of all "effects" the most interesting and significant are such as are indicative of character. To illustrate character-effects of kind, we have but to open our eyes to traits in ourselves or others that we are noting and interpreting evei-y hour. The shop- keeper that makes change just as scrupulously with children too young to count the money handed back as with older folk, we say is honest, and we trust him ever after. The farmer who is continually adjusting the harness to his horses at the plow is the man that workmen will hire out to. Character-effects of degree are not so numerous as those of kind, and yet abound within the observation of everybody. The man I once knew who was never heard to say yes or no, but was even whipped by his schoolmaster for obstinately refusing to use one of these words, furnishes a unique example. Lincoln returning to re- lease the pig affords a far nobler illustration. Next impor- tant among character-effects are those of mood. ' Kind' effects of mood are exceedingly numerous. A curl of the lip shows scorn; a mere gesture betrays impatience or perhaps peevish- VI INTRODUCTION ness; a drawing of the face-muscles indicates a passing twinge of pain. As to 'degree' effects of mood, an oath or a blow, a harsh retort or an insulting epithet, are too evident examples. The lad, in Browning's Incident of the French Camp, who, from en- thusiasm for his chief, brings the news of victory with "his breast all but shot in two," is a superb illustration of how these simple elements of power are used in books. Under the first division there remain to be considered such as are best called effects of Incident. They are easily distin- guished from effects of Character, and of Mood, since, though often arousing imagination equally with these, they never quite amount to revealments of personality, or of emotional states. Incident effects, like the others, are either of kind or of degree. The sudden fall of the mercury in a ship's glass, in the tropics, is a good example of the 'kind' variety. Imagination not only pictures the coming hurricane, but the behavior of the steamer in weathering the stress. The diagnosis of disease proceeds by incident effects of kind, the threatened sickness and its probable period being anticipated in the imagination of the physician, or, more typically, of some anxious friend. When imagination is occupied not so much with the nature of the disease as with its severity, as when pronounced cholera or yellow fever, the effect is not of kind but degree. A fire-alarm reported as from a the- atre where friends of ours are witnessing a play is an incident- effect of ' degree.' Imagination does not evaluate the kind, but the degree of peril that is imminent. Usually both in life and in books, degree-effects are preceded by effects of kind. Sometimes effects are met with that do duty for degree and kind both in one. This is the method of Tennyson in Elaitie. It is the secret of the dynamic quality in Beside the Bonnie Brier Bush. Shakespeare in his strongest work uses this method of concentration. He introduces Hamlet to us by a degree-effect of mood, by having him wear, while the court is in marriage dress, the blackest mantle he can find, and making him refuse even to look upon his uncle and his mother. We sus- pect this due to a reckless and defiant feeling, that will quickly pass. By the time he finishes his soliloquy we change our infer- ART OF SHAKESPEARE VU ence, and interpreting again find that we have filled our con- sciousness with the inky cloak, his yielding to his mother, and his defiance of the King as degree effects of character, poten- tially including all antecedent effects of kind. According to the first division, then, effects are of two princi- pal species. Kind and Degree; and each of these is divided further into three sub-classes, as in the following scheme. Effects of Kind of Degree Effects of Incident Effects of Incident Effects of Mood Effects of Mood Effects of Character Effects of Character Under the second division, 'effects' are considered without reference to their nature or their influence upon imagination, but wholly as to the manner of their use. When observed and inter- preted at first hand they are Direct. When reported by the ob- server and interpreted after his example, they may be called Second-Hand, since they have been used before. The spectacle of the broken-down old man, told about in our earliest illustra- tion, furnished direct character-effects of degree to the writer of these pages; but to the reader they are second-hand. If any attempt were made to enact such effects, either in the com- moner manner of mimicry or upon the stage, they would be- come Dramatic. Of course in Shakespeare, except in the Venus, the Lucrece, and the Sonnets, all character-hints are of the last- named sort. Another literary and dramatic principle, next in importance to Emotional Inference, must not be omitted here. This is the principle of Subordination. The given mind is constantly insti- tuting comparisons not only between other respective minds but between others and itself. The man who is penetrative recog- nizes another as yet more acute. One that is artistic interprets at once the signs of a superior taste or sensitiveness to beauty, and postures himself as to a leader. In common life the million- aire subordinates himself to his shoemaker, or the shopman from Vlll INTRODUCTION whom he buys his hats and gloves. A Gladstone, inspecting his estate, may be subordinated, if his jeweled repeater chances to be wrong, to the meanest tenant boy whose ten-shilling watch has just been set. In a strange city we are consciously subordi- nated to the street workman, of whom we inquire the way. Any isolated and incidental superiority is enough to engage imagina- tion, and will perhaps amount to a temporary reversal of stated and recognized relations. By devices of this sort an author is enabled to control at will the sympathies of his audience with reference to a given per- sonality. In the drama the simplest means is to make the person to be subordinated enter to the character or characters that shall be superior for the time being. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are put to an appropriate disadvantage, as re- gards Hamlet, at their first meeting, by entering to him, as a little earlier in the same scene was also Polonius, At the end, to help complete Hamlet's temporary abasement, he is made to enter to the grave digger, and indeed to be worsted in a wit- combat with him. But by this expedient Hamlet is given in turn the vantage, just before he is again idealized to us, as he awaits the entry of the mourners and overhears the imprecations of Laertes. Nothing is more edifying than special and separ- ate study of the situations in a play of Shakespeare, with re- spect to the ingenuity and variety of his subordinations. No complete or even provisional outline of Shakespeare's principles and methods is contemplated here. Enough has been given to enable successful first study of his greater works. As has been noted, all minds of average intelligence achieve the power to read character and moods and motives in outside circumstances. To do this in books, we must quicken our im- aginations, and, by adding the element of conscious knowledge, complete and verify our inchoate and partial experiences. Thus- the matter-of-fact mind may learn the pleasures of literature and the bookish brain become expert in the interpretation of life and men. QUESTIONS ON THE ART OF HAMLET. ACT I. SCENE I. 1. (a) As the curtain rises at the opening of the play, is the •effect bright and cheering or the reverse? (d) How many figures on the stage at first? {c) Does Francisco walk about or make any noise? Why? (d) Is Bernardo yet on guard? Which of these should challenge? 2. (a) Who should first see the other, Francisco or Bernardo? Who does see the other first? How do you explain this and the challenging? (d) Is this a time of war? (c) Does Bernardo expect to find Francisco just here? (d) If Bernardo seems startled on seeing him, why is it? {e) Why does not Bernardo use some other than the abrupt, military manner of expression? 3. (a) In " Nay, answer me,'' what word has chief stress? Ex- pand Francisco's meaning in these three words? {d) Is Fran- cisco as much startled as Bernardo? Why? (c) What does "Stand and unfold yourself" mean? {d) Do you take it Ber- nardo's response is the watchword of the night? (e) Why does he not stand upon his dignity and insist that Francisco shall re- spond to /lis challenge? Does he even think of this? 4. (a) Did Bernardo recognize Francisco's voice in 1. 2? {d) Did Francisco recognize Bernardo's in 1. i? Why? {c) In 1. 3? Why? [d) Is there any difference in the manner in which 2 ANALYTIC QUESTIONS Bernardo's first two speeches are uttered? Explain, (e) What would happen to Bernardo if he did not come carefully upon his hour? {/) Then why does Francisco note this, and even thank him for coming at all? 5. (a) What dramatic purpose in making Bernardo say "'Tis now struck twelve"? {d) Why the question about "quiet guard," 1. 10? [c) Does Francisco's answer indicate that he has been under any strain to-night? If so, why, again, did he not hear or see Bernardo? (d) Does Bernardo's answer indicate that he is delighted to hear Francisco has had quiet guard ? Why is this? 6. (a) Why does Bernardo wish Horatio and Marcellus to make haste? (d) Which person comes first to his mind? Which enters first? What does Shakespeare accomplish by this? {c) Why does not Horatio now challenge first, as Bernardo did? (d) From the text does it seem that Horatio stops when com- manded? (e) Why does he not give the countersign? 7. (a) Is Horatio startled? Do you think Marcellus alone might be? {d) Why does not Francisco leave the first time he says good night? (c) Why does Marcellus talk here, and why does not Horatio? {d) What does Bernardo's question about Horatio indicate? (e) What Horatio's reply? (/) Whom does Bernardo welcome first? Why "good " Marcellus? 8. (a) From 11. 21-22, does it seem that either Marcellus or Bernardo has any doubt of the reality of former appearances of "this thing "? (d) Why does Marcellus say "the jninutes of this night"? {c) What is meant by "approve our eyes"? (^) Why is it desired that Horatio should speak to this apparition? 9. {a) From 1. 30, how does Horatio seem to feel about being here at all? {b) In what mood does Horatio say, " Well, sit we down"? {c) At this point, which one of the characters repre- sents the mood of the audience? {d) If Bernardo should comr plete his story would the attitude of the audience be changed? Would Horatio's attitude? {,e) What is accomplished by the few lines Bernardo speaks? 10. {a) Upon Horatio, what is the effect of the ghost's appear- ance? {b) Upon the audience, what? (^) Why do Marcellus and Bernardo each speak twice before Horatio speaks? Why does each appeal to Horatio? {d) Why does Marcellus say "Thou art a scholar"? () What is the purpose of these lines in the play? (c) By the end of the scene, in which of all the characters are we most interested? (d) How is this result accomplished? SCENE II. 1. (a) As compared with the preceding scene, what contrast now in the appearance of the stage? [d) From the stage direc- tion, does it seem that all the court are present? (c) From the King's first speech, do you think he has met the court before as king ? (d) How should the courtiers be dressed, gaily or so- berly? (e) On such an occasion, how would a king probably take it if some one should appear in black? (f) How is Hamlet clad (cf. 1. 7'j)'^. 2. {a) What is thus shown of Hamlet's mood? {b) What of his character? (c) Who should be the most prominent figure at a court reception? [d) Who is most prominent here? {e) How does Hamlet's manner compare with that of the courtiers (cf. 11. 70-71)? 3. (fl) Do you know anything of the English law about mar- riage with the brother of a dead husband (cf. Encyclopiedia Britannica, article Marriage)? {b) Has it been long since the last King died? (c) Do you imagine the King has been eager to meet the court? {d) Is the talk about the late King's death and the marriage unnecessarily long, or does the King seem will- ing to find another theme? (e) Is the manner of this speech easy and natural, or the reverse? (/) Does the presence of Hamlet make it easier for the King to say what he must say ? {g) How much truth probably is there in 11. 14-16? 4. (a) Does the conduct of Fortinbras indicate any contrast between the King and his predecessor? {b) If you were in Hamlet's place, would you enjoy your mother's conduct? (c) What do you think Hamlet means by wearing this inky cloak? {d) Does it take any courage to wear it? {e) After Cornelius and Voltimand go, to whom would the court naturally expect the King to speak first? (/) Which seems most eager, Laertes to talk or the King to have him talk? (^^) How do you explain this? 5. (a) Is the King fortunate in his manner of addressing Ham- let? {i) Does Hamlet enjoy being called his son? (c) Does Hamlet perceive the King's embarrassment? (^) What does Hamlet mean by 1. 65? (e) From the readiness of this aside, what do you assume of Hamlet's ability to deal with the King? 6. (a) What does the old expression " i' the sun" mean? (d) Do you find any double meaning in "sun"? (c) What can the King say in reply? Do you understand why it is not he who speaks next, but the Queen? (rt^) If you were in Hamlet's place, would consolation from this mother be effective? What would you think of the "for ever" of 1. 70? () If these men were in the pay of the King to lure Hamlet to the platform, would they differ ? Do you think Hamlet understands this? (c) What possibility of deception is left ? (d) Does the manner of asking 1. 240 seem to invite pre- cision in the answer? What does this question test? (e) In 11. 242-253, does Hamlet show lack of readiness in decision? 14. (a) Why does Horatio say z/ instead of /le, 11. 215-220? And why should such strong language be used in 11. 244-246 and in 1. 127 of Sc. I.? (d) Has Hamlet in this scene accepted any subordination of the rest to his princely rank? (c) Which clearly subordinates the other by nature, Hamlet or Horatio? (d) Do or do not Hamlet's words indicate penetration and intelligence? {e) How far did the guards go in divining the cause of the ghost's appearance? How far did Horatio go ? How far does Hamlet go ? (/) In 1. 256 do you find any tendency to procras- tination ? SCENE III. 1. {a) With what incident in the preceding scene is this scene connected? (d) What of evident importance in the play is told us in Laertes' second speech? (c) From Ophelia's first words, do you think her affectionate or self-contained? (d) From her second speech, do you think she loves Hamlet or not? () Which next, and where? (c) Which last? {d) What is your recollection of the order common in the modern novel? (e) Which order do you find most impresses you, and why ? (/) After the ghost and Hamlet have left, do Horatio and Marcellus seem com- posed? 10 ANALYTIC QUESTIONS SCENE V. 1. (a) At the close of Scene IV., might an audience after all think Hamlet reckless in his conduct? (d) Do you see any pur- pose in 1. I of Scene v.? () Why must he suffer punish- ment ? (c) Would it not be more appropriate to have a saved spirit thus urge revenge? Why? {d) How does the manner of the ghost's disappearance affect the revelation? 5. (a) With all the ghost's abhorrence of what has been done and eagerness to be revenged, yet what two restrictions does even he think must be placed upon Hamlet? (d) When the ghost leaves, what is Hamlet's mood at first, disgust at the foul crime committed, or eagerness for revenge ? Would anything else be consistent with such love as Hamlet's for his father ? (c) What is Hamlet's thought in "And shall I couple hell ? " i'd) Is it, as some have thought, dislike of the task imposed upon him that makes Hamlet say 11. 94-95 ? (e) With " Remember thee," 1.95, comes what natural change of mood? (/) What mood again in 11. 105-110? (g) In 11. 110-112 ? HAMLET 11 6. (a) With what in Macbeth would you compare in effect the shouting now heard within ? {b) Is it possible for such tension as Hamlet's now to continue? [c] When this tension is relieved, do you expect to find Hamlet at once perfectly normal ? {d) Do you understand Hamlet's seeming levity and irreverence later in the scene? () Is Hamlet a man likely to feel his respon- sibility as both judge and executioner, and here also investigate further before acting, or do you expect him to kill the King on sight ? (c) Would the latter course taint such a man's mind ? id) In what circumstances would it place the Queen ? 12. (a) Is there another possible motive Denmark might sus- pect for such a deed ? (3) How would the evidence upon which Hamlet had acted seem when brought forward to clear him ? (c) Would Hamlet consent to live at all with such a name ? (d) Do you think it likely that Hamlet will seek some sort of evidence to corroborate the ghost's testimony ? (e) In those days before chemistry could assist, would such evidence be easy to secure ? (/) Can you imagine what Hamlet is thinking of when he speaks of the possibility of assuming his "antic disposition" hereafter? Does this supply any clue to the method he may follow? {^) When Hamlet's proof is conclusive, from what you have seen of him do you think he will neglect his revenge ? ACT II. SCENE I. 1. (a) With what preceding scene is this connected? {l>) Does this act begin on the day following the night that ended Act I.? How does Shakespeare at once cause us to identify with sufficient definiteness the time that has elapsed ? {c) Whose ad- vice will Reynaldo be following when he acts marvellous wisely ? {d) What hint of Laertes' character in this advice? What hint of Polonius' character ? ( What evidence as to the sincerity of Polonius in 11. 46-49? {d) Of what earlier in the play do these lines remind you? 6. {a) What new revelation of the King's character and mood in 11, 49-54? {b) Why must this be given to us here? 7. {a) What are the King, Polonius, and Ophelia doing when Hamlet enters? {b) How does their present occupation affeCc 22 ANALYTIC QUESTIONS our impression of them? And how, in particular, does the King's action here affect any sympathy for him that may have been elicited by 11. 49-54? 8. (a) Do you recall any evidence earlier in the play as to whether Hamlet is familiar with this mood? {d) Explain just why it is that Hamlet thinks of suicide? Would it be before or after taking the King's life that he would take his own? (c) How much does Hamlet expect of the play in II., 11., 583-585? Does he expect it to prove io the world that his father was mur- dered, and that Claudius was the murderer? {d) Do or do not 11. 46-54 lead you to think that the King may "blench"? (^) Then, if Hamlet knows his course and acts upon this knowledge, in what light will he be regarded by Denmark and the world? (/) If he takes his own life after slaying the King how will his name be affected? (g) Which course do you think Hamlet would prefer? 9. {a) Upon what ground does Hamlet at once put the ques- tion in 1. 57? {U) Would this line seem in place if spoken by any other of Shakespeare's characters as you know them? If not, why may Hamlet be permitted to speak as here ? 10. {a) What in Hamlet's time was the one belief as to the fate of the suicide in the future world ? (b) Do 11. 60-64 express the ancient or the Christian philosophy? What of 11. 65-68? {c) It has been thought that Hamlet fears he will be slain by the guards if he shall kill the king. Does this soliloquy support that view? 11. {a) Is Hamlet more or less likely to be taken off his guard by Ophelia than by Rosencrantz and Guildenstern ? {b) Does his mood now seem one that will make him quick to detect a plot such as Polonius has devised? {c) Are 11. 88-go, oris any part of them, spoken to Ophelia? [d) What do these lines in- dicate as to the genuineness of his love for her? 12. {a) Has Ophelia been about the castle of late? {b) Where and how did Hamlet last see her? {c) Did she then speak to Hamlet? Why? (^) Did Hamlet seem to understand the cir- cumstances? {e) Why has Hamlet since been so rough with Polonius, for example in II., 11., 181-186? HAMLET 23 13. (a) What would Hamlet naturally expect Ophelia to do here, now that she sees him? Does he expect her to speak? {d) What was the King's last move in his espionage of Hamlet? {c) Has Ophelia shown character that will prevent her partici- pating in work of the sort? (d) What do II. 90, 91 assume as to Hamlet's conduct toward Ophelia? How true is this assump- tion? What is there remarkable in Ophelia's saying these lines at all? 14 (a) Of what is Hamlet thinking as he says 1. 92? (d) Do you think Hamlet meant I., v., 97-104 ? How has he adhered to the resolution there expressed ? (c) Why was Ophelia to "read on this book"? Was Hamlet to suspect that she thought of seeing him? (d) Had Polonius intended she should bring these *' remembrances "? Why does she do this? [e) Why does Ham- let speak as in 11. 95, 96 ? And what truth is there in these lines ? 15. (a) Has Hamlet ' proved unkind'? (d) Why does he now say 1. 103? (c) Is the "insanity" of 11. 103-119 for Ophelia alone? {d) What proofs does the time now give this paradox, 1. 114? (e) What truth in 11. 114, 115, and what in 1. 119? 16. (a) What is Ophelia's mood in 1. 120? (d) In the contest now on in Denmark, what must be Ophelia's fate ? {c) Does Hamlet think of a happy, quiet life as a possibility for himself under any circumstances? What does he realize as to this? {d) Even if it were possible that Ophelia should marry another, would Hamlet wish this ? (e) Why does Hamlet, in this " mad- ness ", so often speak as in 11. 121, 129, 137, 140, and 148, 149? (/) Is this, or is it not, good advice to Ophelia? 17. (a) From 11. 129, 130 what does Hamlet now know as to Polo- nius? (d) Why does Hamlet ask? (c) Do you find any parallel in this and II., 11., 279-284? {d) What is the result in each case ? (1?) When, in Hamlet's life, has he been most in need of companionship? To whom has he first turned? With what result? 18. (a) Is Hamlet more, or less, harsh with Ophelia in 11. 132, 133? Why? (^ ) Are these lines said to her alone ? (c) Why does he now say " Farewell," and what does he mean by this? (d) Is it more, or less, strongly that he now insists that she shall go to a nunnery ? Why ? M ANALYTIC QUESTIONS 19. {a) What first shows Ophelia the hopelessness of Hamlet's insanity? (d) Have you ever found Hamlet so 'insane' as here? Why is this? Is there any kindness about it? 20. (a) What do 11. 150-161 show as to the sincerity of Ophe- lia's love for Hamlet? {d) What do these lines show as to Ham- let's character before his father's death? Was he then known as gloomy or morose ? (c) What indication here as to the depth of Ophelia's character, and the relative influence of Polonius and Hamlet over her? Will she, after all, go to a nunnery? Could Hamlet do more to cause her to do this ? (^) What is '.here in the nature of each that explains this love? 21. (a) Does the King dare to proceed openly against Ham- let? Why should this be? (i) Do you think Hamlet under- stands this, and how should he? (c) If the King hears 11. 147, 148, why will it not defeat Hamlet's purposes ? {d) Do you think the courtiers you have seen are all there is of Denmark ? What hints has Shakespeare given as to this ? 22. (a) What is there, aside from Hamlet's words, that makes the King so ready to suspect as in 11. 164-167? (d) From the King's words and conduct heretofore, do you think he states his real motive in II. 171-175 ? If not, what do you take to be his pur- pose in sending Hamlet to England ? (c) Why does Polonius say II. 176-178? And why does he now propose the meeting with the Queen? {d) How has this scene affected your impression of Ophelia? SCENE II. 1. (a) What is Hamlet's purpose in having the players come to him at this time? (($>) If he should not see them and impress upon them the necessity for perfect acting, how might his plans be defeated? (c) In thus instructing the actors in their own art, do you find that Hamlet blunders anywhere? {d) Is it possible to add much of worth to the philosophy of the drama given in II. 1-32 ? 2. (a) In 11. 1-41, upon what particulars does Hamlet specially insist, and for what immediate reasons? (d) Do you imagine this talk will in any way affect the acting of the play in hand ? (c) Why is Hamlet so abrupt with everybody in 11. 41-45 ? Why does he not now amuse himself with Polonius and the rest? {d) What contrast of mood in 11. 42, 43? (e) What is Hamlet's real purpose in 1. 45? 3. (a) What contrast in 11. 49, 50 and I., 11., 161, and what in 1. 72, and I., v., 1 17-124? (d) How do you account for this? 4. (a) Under ordinary circumstances, would Hamlet ever speak as in U. 49, 50? if not, how do you explain his impulse to this direct statement here? (1^) Does Hamlet now expect ever to be able to testify in deeds to his friendship for Horatio? What seems to be Hamlet's notion of the course events will take in Denmark? (c) In 1. 51, is it because Hamlet is a prince that Horatio is flattered? If not, why is it? (d) If Horatio were permitted to continue, what would he say? (e) Why does Ham- let prevent this? 5. (a) A moment before, would Hamlet himself have thought it possible for him to speak as in 11. 57-69? (d) Why does he say the last five words of 1. 69? And why are 11. 70-82 so differ- ent m tone? (r) What evidence in 11. 69-82 as to the sincerity of the lines preceding? (d) Do you recall anywhere in litera- ture so direct, strong, and quiet an expression of friendship as here? (1?) In 11. 49-82, do you find Hamlet sensitive or obtuse ( "muddy-mettled" )? 6. {a) What does Hamlet show us of his ideals in 11. 55-57 and 63-69? (d) How do these lines, and especially 11. 65, 66, contribute to an understanding of Hamlet's own character, and why is it not unpermissible so to interpret them? (c) Why does Hamlet add 11. 73-75 and 81, 82 to 1. 80, and how is this charac- teristic of him ? (d) What would you say of the evidence as to a tendency to procrastinate in 11. 41-47, 51, and 79-86? {e) If you think Shakespeare has been misunderstood, do you think it Shakespeare's fault? 7. (a) Is it because Hamlet and Horatio have forgotten 11. 49- 69, or why is it, that neither one afterwards, even by his man- ner, seems to recall the words? (d) What is the significance of 02ir and cousin, 1. 87? {c) What theory of the King's does Ham- let encourage by 11. 88,89? {^) How does Hamlet encourage Polonius by 1. 103? () Why, in 11. 241, 242, does Hamlet insist upon "Gonzago" and "Italian"? Do you imagine there is now an understanding between him and the King? (c) Do you understand why the King rises and leaves the hall? (c/ ) Is it the words of the play that affect him to this degree? Why did he not leave when the dumb-show was playing? 14. (a) What did Hamlet expect the effect upon the King would be? Why was the help of Horatio sought? {l>) How does the actual effect compare with Hamlet's expectations? ic) How must the court interpret the King's extraordinary behav- ior? (d) Do you imagine Hamlet now contemplates suicide as a possible necessity? (e) Why is Ophelia, rather than Hamlet, the tirst to speak? What does this indicate as to Hamlet's mood, and as to the attention the King has attracted? , 15. {a) What does Hamlet wish to emphasize by 1. 245? For whom is the line intended, the King or the court? (d) Why does the King stop to call for /tg-Zii before he goes? And what does 1. 248 show of his mood? {c) What purpose, dramatically, is accomplished by the "all but" of the stage direction following 1.249? 16. How do you account for Hamlet's conduct in 11. 250-274, — why, for example, does he rhyme and call for recorders? 17. (a) How long has it been since Rosencrantz and Guilden- stern left the hall? Do you think this a "free visitation " on their part? {d) Are they likely just now to have their way with Hamlet? (c) What is the cause of Hamlet's interest, 1. 279? (d) What effect was expected from 1. 280, and again from 1. 282? {e) Has either of ihese 'friends' ever before assumed such authority in Hamlet's presence as now in 11. ;86, 287? How do you explain their boldness here? (/") ^Vhat do these lines im- ply as to Hamlet's insanity? Why this assumption ? Will the King be quick to offer proofs? 18. {a) If you or Hamlet were heretofore willing to overlook the conduct of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern in serving the King, does their attitude now make any change in yours ? Why ? (d) What evidence have you as to the truth of II. 289, 290? 28 ANALYTIC QUESTIONS (c) What, evidently, does Hamlet mean and Guildenstern under- stand by 1. 291? (d) Does Hamlet expect Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to believe 11. 298, 299? If not, why does he say his "wit's diseased "? ig. (a) Why is it not Guildenstern who replies? (d) What does Hamlet try to do in 1. 310? (c) What is the significance of Hamlet's oath, I. 312? (d) Why do not Rosencrantz and Guild- enstern believe Hamlet's direct statement (1. 316) in confirma- tion of what has up to this time been their own theory ? If they do believe it and tell it to the King, how will he receive the news? 20. (a) Why do the players now re-enter? (d) What have Rosencrantz and Guildenstern really accomplished so far in the King's service? How has Hamlet made use of them? (c) Has Hamlet further use for them in mind ? Why, or why not? (d) What, then, does he give them to understand in 11. 321-347? 21. (a) Why has Polonius tried to make himself agreeable to Hamlet, on Hamlet's account or the King's? (d) How has Ham- let made Polonius appear by 1. 357? (c) What is the significance of 1. 359 ? (d) Do you think Hamlet understood what Polonius had come for before he spoke ? 22. (a) What instances do you recall of contrasts similar to 11. 362, 363 earlier in the play? (d) Has Hamlet ever before spoken as in II. 365-367? Why? {c) What does Hamlet suspect about his mother that makes him even think of the "soul of Nero"? (d) What does Hamlet evidently intend to attempt in his mother's closet? SCENE III. I. (a) Who, according to their report, had sent Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to Hamlet? And to whom do they make their report of the interview? To whom does Polonius report? What does this show? (d) How has Hamlet's madness ranged, and why stands it now so unsafe with the King? (c) What is the court likely to " gather and surmise" from such continued agi tation as the King here showi ? (d) After 1. i, can Rosencrantz and Guildenstern deceive themselves into thinking they may HAMLET 29 help Hamlet by serving the King? Have they, in fact, ever de- ceived themselves ? 2. (a) Do you imagine the King will be glad to see Hamlet on his return from England? What do you take to be the King's real purpose in sending him? (/?) Do you think Rosencrantz and Guildenstern fail to understand the situation? (r) How does their eloquence in 11. 7-23 affect them and the King in your esti- mation? (d) Does the King pretend to motives of the sort they assume ? (c) What is the mood in 11. 24-26? 3. (a) Where was the wise suggestion Polonius compliments in 11. 28-33 first made, and by whom ? (d) Why does Polonius here give the King credit for it ? {c) Has the King in this scene seemed eager for company ? (d) What further is shown of his mood now that he is alone ? What has caused this, or the degree of it ? (e) How strong is the King's moral nature shown to be? 4. (a) Aside from the motives Hamlet later gives, would it be possible for him to act on the impulse of II. 73, 74 ? Why ? (d) Would an audience of Shakespeare's time or of our own enjoy seeing him so act? (c) What direct evidence has Hamlet had, evidence now in his mind, that the theology of 11. 74-79 and 84-95 is sound? {(i) Do you think Hamlet means what he says here, or is he seeking to evade his mission ? () Are they brought by the same men as Horatio's, and do the men insist on ' speaking with ' the receivers ? (c) What does Hamlet mean by "set naked," and why tells the King this, saying j/^z<(r Kingdom ? {d) Can you account for the new spirit you find in this letter? (e) Is it a new erratic turn of its author's mood? (/) What 'effect' of Hamlet's postscript "alone"? 3. (a) Why does Laertes, in lieu of a bloody revenge, threaten to "live and tell him to his teeth"? (d) Why does not the King remind and countenance him, that he may do his worst? (c) What makes Laertes again suddenly think of revenge, solic- iting indeed the chance? (d) Do you believe that Hamlet was envenomed with envy at Lamond's report? 4. (a) Point out the steps in the evolution of the plot against Hamlet's life? (3) What is the King, from his questions, anx- ious to ensure from Laertes? (c) What is Laertes, from his, de- oirous to secure from the King in relation to his deed? (d) HAMLET 39 What 'effect' of degree in Laertes' last answer, and in the King's remark upon it ? 5. {a) Does the report of Ophelia's death seem more, or less, terrible as made under these auspices? (^) Do you find that the Queen's description causes you to see vividly the manner of her death? (c) Do you find that the names of the flowers and their associations assist in the tragic impressions? {d) Why should not here be the climax of the tragedy of poor Ophelia, — why should this be less affecting than even her first entry in scene V. ? (e) Do you find your admiration for Hamlet affected by this situation or this scene? (/) Why does the author make the violent exit of Laertes stop the whole? ACT V. SCENE I. 1. (a) Who is the person whose Christian burial is here in question? How does the author tell us? (d) What attitude is the first clown taking with regard to the matter, and what the second? {c) From 11. 4, 5, what do you understand has taken place? id) What meaning is there behind the first clown's lan- guage, 11. 6, 7 ? 2. (a) Are these men trying to be comical, are they clowns in the modern sense? (d) Can you account for the talk in 11. g-12? (c) What effect does it have on the second clown? () What is the occasion of this mood in Hamlet? (c) Why does not Laertes answer something ? (d) What later in the paragraph explains all? (if) Do you think Hamlet means what he says ? ig. (a) Is Hamlet speaking and acting here after the fashion that the court has of late remarked ? (d) Why does the Queen say it is madness when she more than all the rest knows better ? (c) Do you think she fears something from Laertes ? Why ? .{d) Now that Hamlet has been pronounced mad, both by his mother and by the King, why does he not go back to his crazy role ? (e) If he had done so, would the King have been better pleased? Would the Queen? 20. (a) What does Hamlet allude to in 1. 279? (/;) Why again does Laertes refuse to speak? (^) How do you understand that the part of Laertes should be played here as to movements or posture? id) Do you not think Hamlet's language in II. 280-282 a little egotistic ? Does he really mean that he thinks himself a Hercules? 21. (a) If Hamlet came to the churchyard to wait for some- thing, why does he go thus away? (d) Why does he not take Horatio, and why does Horatio stay ? [c) Why does the King bid him follow his friend? {d) Of what use is the King's word now to Laertes? (e) Does Gertrude understand or suspect? (/) What does the King intend shall be the effect of 1. 286? (£) What the meaning of the last three lines, and to whom addressed? SCENE II. I. (a) How does it chance that Hamlet and Horatio have not discussed the matters alluded to in the letter (IV., vi.) till now? (d) How does it chance they are now here together? (c) What 44 ANALYTIC QUESTIONS is it that Hamlet alludes to by "this," and by "the other?" (^) And what "circumstance" is meant? (e) Do you think Hamlet now feels much grief for Ophelia? Why? 2. (a) Do you think Hamlet usually stops his narration to philosophize, as in his second paragraph here? (d) Does Ham- let's conduct, as now described, argue much weakness and inde- cision? (c) What is the meaning of "wrote it fair"? (d) Why did he once "hold it a baseness to write fair"? Whose hand was he imitating ? (e) Why does Hamlet ask the question in 11. 36, 37? (/) Is Horatio displeased that Hamlet is back in Denmark ? 3. {a) What do you think of Hamlet's forging the King's order for the death of his friends? Do you justify it? (d) What do you understand to be Hamlet's reasons for it? {c) Was it necessary for him to substitute any other death warrant for his own? 4. (a) Whyshould Horatio be surprised, 1.62, at the revelations? (d) Whyshould Hamlet again question whether it does not 'stand him now upon' to do his vengeance? {c) Why is Horatio silent to this appeal? (d) What is really the purport of his next words? 5. (a) What does Hamlet mean by "the interim is mine"? What will he do in it? (d) Will the King, in his opinion, at- tempt public punishment, even when the death of his two friends is known? {c) What will the King attempt? (d) And what does Hamlet feel will be the result? (e) Do you find Hamlet changed in mood, or, as some commentators say, a changed man? (/) Is there any significance in this transition from his own danger and vengeance upon the King to his little quarrel with Laertes? (^) What does he mean in saying "by the image of my cause I see the portraiture of his " ? (A) Has Hamlet forgot what put him in a towering passion? 6. (a) WhatisOsric? (d) Why does Hamlet call him a water- fiy, and keep him waiting by his asides to Horatio? (c) Why is Osric so deferential? 7. (a) What sort of language does Osric use in attempting to tell his message? (d) Had Shakespeare ever known of such language being used anywhere? {c) What name has been given HAMLET 45 to it, and what is its history ? (^) Has any of it occurred before in this play ? 8. (a) After Osric's first long paragraph why does Hamlet use the same kind of speech? (d) Do you detect any difference be- tween the kind each uses? (<;) How long does Hamlet continue in the same vein? (d) What does Horatio mean when he says " all 's golden words are spent "? 9. (a) What is the reason of Osric's answering 'rapier and dag"- ^1?^' to Hamlet's question? (d) Do you think that in the " twelve for nine" wager Shakespeare blunders in his arithmetic? (c) Can you explain the terms of the bet satisfactorily to yourself? 10. {a) Why should not Hamlet, after recent experiences, have regarded this message of the King with suspicion? (d) Why in any case would he consent to please the King? 11. (a) What is the King's purpose in so quickly sending the lord to Hamlet? (d) Do you find anything significant in the words Hamlet uses in 11. igo-192 ? (c) Do you think Hamlet is deceived by the King's apparent friendliness ? 12. (a) From 11. 195, 196, do you think the Oueen is so de- ceived? {d) Do you think she knows of the plot? (c) Why is it that she sends this message? (d) From 1. 197, do you think Hamlet understands her intent? 13' (<2) What happened in Hamlet's life about the time of La- ertes' voyage to France? (d) Why has Hamlet been "in con- tinual practice " since then? (c) Can you explain Hamlet's fore- boding ? Why does he not act on Horatio's advice? 14. (a) What is again shown of Hamlet's character in 11. 214, 215? (d) Does Hamlet now think that either the King or La- ertes believes him mad? Is he treated as a madman in this scene? (c) What does he wish Laertes to understand by 11. 216- 232 ? Why does he not speak more plainly ? 15. {a) Do 11. 238-240, under the circumstances, help Laertes in your estimation ? (d) What contrast in 11. 252, 253 ? 16. (a) Why does Hamlet wish the cup set by awhile ? {6) Why does the Queen proffer her napkin and even come herself to wipe Hamlet's brows? (c) Do you think, with Steevens, that this " might have been spared " ? 46 ANALYTIC QUESTIONS 17. (a) Why is it not the King who calls attention to the Queen when she falls ? (d) Now that Hamlet bleeds and knows of the treachery, what does he think of first? {c) How does I. 296 affect our notion of the King? {a ) What is shown by the Queen now calling to Hamlet and not to the King? i8. (a) Where does Hamlet know the treachery will be found to lie? (d) Do you understand why Shakespeare permitted us to hear 1. 284? (c) Explain Laertes' mood from this line to 1. 319. {d) Does this in any way affect our impression of Hamlet? 19. {a) Would Hamlet heretofore have thought of using an en- venomed sword with which to kill the King? Is the venom needed, — i. e., is it from this that the King dies 't (d) Why does Hamlet say 1. 309? (c) Why does he then act so suddenly? (d) Why does he have nothing to say about "perfect con- science"? (1?) Do you think Hamlet's revenge satisfactory? (/) Does he now lament that he is to die? {^) Why does he say "Queen," I. 321, instead of "mother"? (/z) Point out the "poetic justice" in the manner of the King's death. 20. (a) Now, though the King has been convicted of open villainy, is Hamlet indifferent concerning what the world shall say of his last act? (d) Why does Hamlet say "But let it be," 1. 326 ? (c) Interpret the effects of character and mood in II. 328-331. (d) What evidence as to Hamlet's dread of death in 11. 334-337? Compare with 1. 312, and explain. 21. (a) What effect from the announcement of Fortinbras be- fore Hamlet's death? (d) Is Hamlet made to seem identified with the old order of things or the new in Denmark ? How is this accomplished? (c) What would Hamlet say if he were per- mitted to complete the sentence broken in 1. 346? 22. (a) What are the purposes of the rest of the scene ? id) Do you consider under all the circumstances that Hamlet's life was a failure? (c) What, to you, is the meaning of the play? &.'^. OCT \'i^\ (