F ^^^^^0'^^'^^t' LETTER FROM THE MAYOR OF WASHINOTOJV TO THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, IN REFERENCE TO THE RELATIONS OF THE GENERAL G0YF:KNMENT TO THE CITY OF WASHINGTON ORDERED TO BE PRINTED. WASHINGTON: time being as a grant of money to be applied for the purposes and according to the act of Congress aforesaid, and intrust further that the j^ropr'utor of the soil, his heirs and assigns, shall and may continue his occupation of the land sold at his and their ivill and pleasure until the same shall be occupied under the said appropriations for the use of the United, States as aforesaid or by purchasers. On the 19th of December, 1791, the legislature of Maryland passed an act 12 "concerning the Territory of Columbia and tlie city of Washington," subject- ing the lands of all other persons in the city to the same terms and conditions as those conveyed by Notley Young and others in trust to Beall and Gant. These acts of Congress, the act of the legislature of Maryland, Avith the deeds of trusts from the proprietors of the soil, are the sources of authority under which the President and commissioners acted in laying out the city. The plan of Major I'Enfont, with slight alterations made by Mr. Ellicott, was approved by General Washington, and the division of lots between the government and the proprietors of the soil as provided for in the deeds of trusts made in accordance there w^ith. In the original plan were many spaces reserved to and for the use of the United States. The objects for which they were reserved and the purposes to which they were to be devoted, with the exception of tlio?e for the Capitol and President's House, were not at that time indicated by any official act, of either the President or the commissioners. The designation of the others was held under advisement; and on the 30th of June, 1794, the commissioners directed their surveyor, Mr. Nicholas King, **to lay out the market squares;" and on the 18th of October, in the same year, in a letter addressed to Mr. David Burns, a proprietor of ground in that neigh- borhood, they say, "The ground taken for public use about the market square is not yet entirely ascertained. Mr. Johnson has directions to furnish you with the quantity of your ground appropriated by the commissioners for the market and about it." Congress having authorized the commissioners to borrow a sum of money not exceeding three hundred thousand dollars to provide suitable buildings for its own, the accommodation of the President, and the public officers of the government of the United States, and all the lots vested in the commissioners or the trustees in any manner for the use of the United States then remaining unsold, except those appropriated to public use, being made chargeable with the repayment of this money, (act May 6, 1796,) rendered it necessary that such of the spaces as were intended and reserved for public use should be designated to except them from the terms of the act to prevent ilieir sale. It was not till then that General Washington gave a definite shape to his well-matured reflection on the destinations of the portions of ground in the city of Washington reserved to and for the use of the United States. On the 2d of March, 1797, just two days before he vacated the presidential chair, by virtue of the authority vested in him and the commissioners by acts of Congress and the deed of trust, in order to except them from the terms of the act of May 6, 1796, and to prevent a sale of them under this act, adopting the language of that act and defining them severally by metes and bounds, he appropriated seventeen of those pieces or portions of ground so reserved to and for the use of the United States, as before particularly enumerated and men- tioned, for the uses, purposes and interests before stated, among which was this appropriation for the Centre market. These appropriations so made by General Washington, and the uses and pur- poses to Avhicli they were dedicated, were subsequently, in 1798, recognized by Congress when authorizing a loan of one hundred and fifty thousand dollars to the commissioners from the public treasury, and charging wnth its repayment "all the lots vested in the commissioners or the trustees for the United States and then remaining unsold, excepting those set aj>art for jmhl'ic uses. ^' (Act April IS, 1798.) And again, in 1800, when, "for the greater convenience of the members of both houses of Congress in attending to their duty in the said city of Washing- ton, and the greater facility of communication between the various offices and departments of the government," the commissioners were authorized to borrow money for the purpose of making footways in suitable places and directions, 13 and all the lot;^ in the city of Washington vested in the commissioners or the trustees in the city of Washington, in any manner, for the use of the United States and then remaining unsold, exceiH those set ajmrt for iniUlc purposes, made chargeable with its repayment. The city councils deeming the appropriation of that piece or portion of the property so reserved to and for the use of the United States by General Wash- ington, and its recognition by President Adams and Congress, for the purpose of a market, sufficient, subsequently, on the 6th of October, 1S02, passed an act establishing a market on the space south of Pennsylvania avenue, between Seventh and Ninth streets west, to be known by the name of the Centre market. This act was approved by the then mayor, (Mr. Brent,) an appointee of the President, and the corporation has continued in possession of that space and used it as appropriated by General Washington, and with the consent and appro- bation of every successive President of the United States, for a market and market purposes from that time, a period of sixty-two years. The official plat-book, showing the division of lots between the general go\-- ernment and the proprietors of the soil, in accordance with the deeds of trust and the appropriations of these several pieces or portions of the property so re- served to and for the use of the United States to specific purposes, begun under the direction of President Washington by Mr. Nicholas King, the city'^surveyor, furnished in 1803 and approved by President Adams, and now in the office of the Commissioner of Public Buildings, is the only official record in existence, and transcripts from which, signed by the surveyor of the city of Washington! were made evidence by act of Congress, (act January 12, 1809.) Just after the first act of incorporation of the city of Washington (May 3, 1802,) and the passage of the act by its councils to establish a market on this space, (October 6, 1802,) Mr. Nicholas King, who had been intrusted by Gen- eral Washington with making the official plat-book, on the 25th September, 1803, in a letter to President Adams, in speaking of these appropriations and the uses to which they were to be applied, says : " In the sales that had been made, both by the commissioners and the original proprietors, the desio-nations of these places have been spoken of as inducements to purchasers, many of whom have selected their property accordingly. The extensive appropriation> for the public buildings of the United States and for the city for public walks, markets, and other important purposes, ought to be held agreeably to the inten- tion of the donors, and the views with which they were selected, in order to acquire and secure the public confidence so necessary to our growth and pros- perity." These views were approved by President Adams and his successors in office to the present time, and Congress itself, in 1812, 1820, 1824, 1826, and 1848, sanctioned them when it provided " that the corporation shall have power and authority to occupy and improve for public purposes, by and with the consent of the President of the United States, any part of the public and open spaces and squares in said city not interfering with any private rights." And again, on the 31st of May, 1832, by section eleven of an act of that date was the right of this corporation to occupy the particular reservation in question in the Wixy and for the purposes proposed expressly recognized by Congress. Likewise Congress (act May 9, 1860) recognized the claim of this corporation to use that s*pace for the purpose of a market, and ceded to it that property for such purpose so long as the market-house should be continued thereon, and authorized the city of Washington to borrow a sum not exceeding two hundred thousand dollars, at a rate of interest not exceeding six per cent., coupled, however, with a con- dition that a new market-house, according to a certain plan, should be built thereon within the period of two years. Thus it appears very clearly that up to a very recent period the executive and legislative authority of the country has recognized the right of this city to 14 occupy tins public space as a public market, and it lias so occupied it under a claim of right for more than sixty years. Nor is there any act of the Executive or any proceeding- in Congress to be found inconsistent with this lawful claim ; for although at first the act of the 9th of May, 1860, may seem to be incon- sistent with such a claim, on examination it will be found not to be so. By the amended charter of 1848, section ten, the corporate authorities of this city are expressly prohibited from increasing its funded debt, except in the manner prescribed in that section. In the year 1860 they desired to erect a new market-house on the site of the old Centre market, and to enable them to do so applied to Congress for power to create a debt not exceeding two hundred thousand dollars at a rate of interest not exceeding six per cent. On this ap- plication Congress passed the act in question. The first sentence of the first section of this act recognizes the fact that this space has been heretofore and is still occupied for the Centre market, and ceded it to the corporation on condi- tion that they should, within two years thereafter, erect thereon a market-house. The third sentence authorizes the corporation to create a debt not exceeding two hundred thousand dollars to erect said market-house. And the third section provides that in case it shall take effect it shall be construed to vest the title to the property in the corporation, so long as the said market-house shall be con- tinued thereon and used for the purposes aforesaid, and no longer. We are to look for the meaning of the legislature to the common-sense con- struction of the words employed, the remedy they intended to provide, and to the external facts, to aid us in discovering the mischief intended to be remedied. If, as has been shown, this plot of ground was originally set apart as a place for a market-house by General Washington, under the powers vested in him under the deeds of trust from the proprietors of the soil, the acts of Congress, and the Maryland legislature, and has been uninterruptedly, for the space of sixty years, used and occupied by the corporation of Washington, with full knowledge of the executive and legislative authorities, although the title to the land still remained in the United States, and this was no more than a permis sive occupation at the will of the government, it cannot be doubted that until Congress legislated on the subject the city was justified in treating the prop- erty as rightfully devoted to their use. They had not power under this charter to increase the funded debt, so as to enable them to build such a market-house as would satisfy the public demand and gratify the public taste, and claiming the right still to occupy the ground, but desiring to remove all possible doubt as to the permanency of that right, they applied for a cession of the ground, and for power to raise money for the contemplated improvement. In this there was no abandonment of a right, any more than a man who has an equitable estate, or an easement, abandons his claim when he applies for and receives a quit-claim of the legal title outstanding in another, nor does a just criticism of the words of the act lead to any other conclusion. The extent to which they go is that Congress secures to the cor- poration the use of the ground already occupied by the corporation, if the build- ing contemplated in the act shall be constructed within the time limited therein, so long as the building shall be used as a market-house. The failure of the corporation to satisfy the condition, occasioned by the extraordinary condition of the country and the extraordinary state of things, leaves the matter precisely where it stood before, and the respective parties unaffected by it. The resolution to which I have called your attention required your prede- cessor ** to reclaim such public grounds as are unlawfully appropriated, and to prevent the erection of any permanent building upon any property reserved to the use of the United States unless plainly authorized by act of Congress." Unless the word plainly in this resolution is to be read " expressly," or by some equivalent term, 1 beg leave to say the resolution " plainly" did not pro- hibit or authorize your predecessor to prevent the erection of the contemplated 15 market-house. The covenant and agreement in the deeds of trusts from the proprietors of the soil "■ that the grantor and his heirs and assigns i-hovld and. might continue in Jiis possession and occupation of their lands at their will and pleasure, untd they shall be occujned, binder the said a2)proj)riatio?is, fov ihe use of the United States, or /jy purchasers ; and uhen a7iy lots or parcels shall be occujiied by purchase or appropriation as aforesaid, then and not till then should the grantor reVmquish his occupation thereof the early legislation on this sub- ject, the distinct appropriation of this parcel of ground for a Centre market, and the uninterrupted occupation of it by this corporation for so many years, all show the understanding of the respective parties, that Avhen General Washing- ton set it apart for a Centre market, it was intended that the corporate authori- ties of the city, then in contemplation, when they should come into being, should have the use of it for a Centre market. It is not possible to conceive that either the President, or the trustees, or Congress, were to build and manage a market-house, and it was then, as now, emphatically a part of the powers held by municipal corporations. That General Washington, under the express legislation of Congress already referred to, had power so to set apart, designate, and appropriate this specific reservation, can admit of no rational doubt. That he did so set it apart ir^ equally certain. We have, then, the act of Congress which "plainly" author- ized the President to set apart this reservation for the purposes of a market, the act of the President executing the power so vested in him, and the acts of this corporation from time to time improving the ground and erecting the buildings thereon, and it can scarcely be contended that under this resolution you are re- quired to prevent them from pulling down those old, unsightly, and dilapidated buildings, thus abating a nuisance already borne too long b}^ this community, and electing new and htting ones in their place. PUBLIC SCHOOLS. 'J'ho matter of public schools is one that reaches the v/hole community, and in which the municipal authorities have manifested the greatest care and interest. With the greatest liberality on the part of the city councils, and a willingness on the part of the citizens to bear taxation for this purpose, it is impossible, as yet, to provide for the wants of the community in this respect. Hundreds in the employment of the general government who have no interest in the commu- nity further than connected with the general government and as tempo- rary residents, and Avho do not contribute a cent to their support, avail themselves of the means of education afforded by the corporation for their children ; many of this class would gladly contribute something towards the fostering of this institution, and those who would not should be compelled. The only way to reach them is for Congress to empower this corporation to levy a special capitation tax on all male residents over twenty-one years, for the purposes of public education. The grant of such power Avould, I am cer- tain, be not abused by the corporation, and would not be objectionable. In this connexion, I would point out, Avith a view of having it remedied, the injustice done, doubtless hurriedly and without being advised, by the action of Congress in altering the law in force in this District in relation to the edu- cation of colored children. Under former provisions of law, (act of May 20, 1SG2, section 1,) the pro- priety of which is admitted by all, this corporation set apart from the taxes on real and personal property owned by colored persons in this city, for the pur- pose of educating colored children, the same proportionate part as was set apart from the taxes paid by white persons for the purpose of educating white children. Congress, however, at its last session (act of June 25, 1864, section IS) repealed this equitable provision, and directed that ihe corporate authorities 16 of the cities of Georgetown and Washington thereafter "set apart from the whole fund received by them from all sources applicable under existing provi- sions of law to purposes of public education, such a proportionate part thereof for the education of colored children as the number of colored children in the respective cities, between the ages of six and seventeen years, bears to the whole number of children thereof." Under my construction of this section of this last act of Congress, the trustees of colored schools of this city are entitled to receive from this corporation for the purpose of educating colored children an amount more than twice as much as the Avhole aggregate of taxes paid by all the colored persons of this city ; while under the construction put upon it by the trustees of colored schools, which they claim, they would be entitled to receive an amount more than four times greater than the whole aggregate of taxes paid by colored persons. Whilst the corporate authorities of Wash- ington have been ever ready and willing to do all that can, with propriety and justice, be required of them to meliorate and amend the condition of the colored population of this city, and provide for their intellectual culture and improvement, it is reluctant to do this at so inordinate a cost to the white taxpayer. Whilst Congress has been liberal, and granted large sums and tracts of the public lands to several of the States and Territories', for the purposes of public edu ■ cation, it has not as yet given to this city, from which it obtained so much, a dollar, and has given away, without consideration, valuable franchises — the in- herent right and property of this city — which would have yielded sufficient to support and maintain all its public schools. In this connexion I would ask, that whenever, hereafter, any grant by way of a franchise is made of any privilege in this city, it be conditioned on obtain- ing the consent of the city authorities thereto. In this way, would not only the city be protected, but a revenue legitimately derived Avhicli would materially assist in fostering our .public schools. FIRE DEPARTMENT. The city has, at considerable expense, established a paid lire department with the use of steam fire-engines, as well as erected a fire-alarm telegraph ; your prede- cessor, at my request, granting the corporation for this department the use of certain buildings, the property of the general governn~.ent, erected as engine- houses. These buildings are inadequate for the purposes of the fire department as at present organized, and this corporation would, if the possession was guaranteed for a length of time sufiicient to warrant the expense, tear them down and erect on their sites structures better adapted to the purposes. I would therefore ask of Congress to grant to this city, so long as they may be used for the purposes of a fire department, the lots of ground on which stand the Columbia, Union and Franklin engine-houses. I must, in conclusion, apologize for the length of this communication, neces- sary, however, on account of the importance to this community of obtaining the early action of Congress, in some way or another, on every matter and thing therein mentioned. I am, very respectfully, RICHARD WALLACH, Mayor. Jlon. James Harlan, Secretary of the Interior. ir:i 28. 'M. 1 ^ LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 010 231 166 8 '='^5^\ 'v^r^- fe^-3c1?