HD 6751 1162 No.11 THE SELECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF PROSPECTIVE FOREMEN Unweenile By JOHN W. RIEGEL RSITY Miche n OF DECLARA 1811 MICHIC AN Bulletin No. 11 BUREAU OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1941 THE SELECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF PROSPECTIVE FOREMEN By JOHN W. RIEGEL UNIVERS RSITY OF MICH TTA VERITA 1817 AN BULLETIN No. 11 BUREAU OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1941 COPYRIGHT, 1941 BY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Garnit STOCK 12.41 3 FOREWORD In the latter part of 1940, foremen-training programs took on special · significance when national defense preparations brought about a marked increase in business activity. A potential bottleneck in the defense program, according to some observers, was being created by the demand for additional numbers of properly trained supervisors, both in the defense industries and in other manufacturing establishments. Because of these conditions the Bureau of Industrial Relations at the University of Michigan made a rapid survey of executive opinion regarding the selection and development of prospective foremen. The survey con- sisted of a series of comprehensive interviews with the representatives of twenty leading companies. The experience and opinions of these men form the chief bases of this report. The author wishes to acknowledge their collaboration, and also the assistance of ten other executives who read the manuscript and offered suggestions for its improvement. The survey was aided, moreover, by the Bureau's earlier studies of fore- men-training programs. These studies were made in some fifty companies by S. J. Lukens while he was on leave of absence from the University of Pittsburgh. In drawing upon Mr. Lukens' findings and in the preparation of this manuscript, the author had the editorial assistance of Philip H. Trezise. The earlier studies were made possible by a grant of funds by the Earhart Foundation of Detroit. The final survey was financed by the Endowment Fund of the Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies at the University of Michigan. The generous assistance of these agencies is gratefully acknowledged. February, 1941 J. W. R. CHAPTER CONTENTS SUMMARY I. Responsibilities of Foremen and Subforemen II. Selection of Candidates for Training III. Helping Candidates to Understand Supervisory Problems 30 IV. Developing Candidates' Managerial Skills and Personality Traits APPENDIX Specimen Statements of Foremen's Responsibilities_ PAGE I 1 11 41 59 67 CHAPTER I RESPONSIBILITIES OF FOREMEN AND SUBFOREMEN In 1940, the national defense program brought about a rapid increase in the volume of production in many firms. Well-qualified observers stated that the program might be impaired because of the limited supply of properly trained supervisors. It was pointed out that, because of the previously existing depression, many companies had neglected to develop prospective foremen for a decade. The need for reconstituting programs for the selection and development of prospective foremen became gen- erally recognized. These conditions were thought to warrant a survey of the opinions of executives in twenty leading companies, with reference to their objectives and plans for the training of new supervisors. Fortunately, the survey occurred when the executives were pondering this problem, and they freely discussed their views on it. These interviews were the foundation of this essay, which is a critical discussion of the elements in existing and projected programs for the selection and development of prospective foremen. The executives maintained, as a first principle, that the responsibilities of a supervisory position be carefully considered before any candidate is selected or trained for it. It was a commonplace among them that each foreman's responsibilities are different. Their emphasis on this point sug- gests the desirability of individualized instruction for prospective foremen. Notwithstanding the differences in foremen's responsibilities, it is possible to mention a number of typical duties which mark their positions. These comprise a general pattern which will be reviewed broadly before some noteworthy variations in it are discussed. Typical Responsibilities of Foremen A foreman is primarily an executive; he translates plans for his depart- ment into instructions for each member, and he sees that the group produces the desired results. He often has the aid of auxiliary departments, but the responsibility for the achievement of his group rests on him. To a con- siderable extent he must plan and schedule the work of his subordinates and obtain the materials and equipment which they need. He must select, 1 assign, and direct his subordinates so that the group meets the quantity and quality standards which his management has established. Moreover, it is his duty to see that the cost of production does not exceed prescribed limits. Another common responsibility of foremen is the training and main- tenance of a competent workforce. Each foreman must instruct his men concerning the standards which govern their work and their conduct in the shop. He must train them in effective methods of operation, observe their performance, and correct dangerous or faulty habits of work. He must attend to the physical conditions which affect their health, and see that they comply with regulations for their safety. In addition, a foreman should be concerned with improvements within his department. Although the development of better processing methods may be largely in the hands of engineers, he is expected to be alert to op- portunities for betterments. After new methods have been designed, it is usually his task to help in perfecting and adjusting them. A foreman, furthermore, is expected to observe technical conditions and developments within his department and transmit information about these to his superiors. Thus he aids them to reformulate plans to meet changing conditions. A foreman should be interested in the welfare of his company as a whole. He is expected to cooperate with technicians and to facilitate the work of other departments which use the products turned out in his own. section. Even where there has been a well-considered assignment of duties to each person in an organization, the plans cannot provide for all con- tingencies. In the general interest, foremen frequently must go beyond their prescribed duties to assist other departments. S Again, a foreman is expected to serve as the representative of his man- agement to his men and, in turn, as their representative to the management. Here all parties are viewed primarily as members in a productive team. He should be well acquainted and have a friendly relationship with each of his employees in order to express their interests to the higher executives. While his knowledge of his employees should relate mainly to their work, he can improve his leadership by learning about their outside activities and their interests in the community. A foreman can represent his management better after it has informed him with regard to its labor policy and the production policies which are of vital interest to the employees. And his managers should encourage him to represent his employees and make recommendations in their interest. 2 Finally, recognition must be given to the fundamental obligation of a foreman to improve himself. He is duty-bound to be his own critic and to take positive steps to correct any shortcomings in his supervisory methods. or in his personal relations with his men. This summary of a foreman's responsibilities covers the essential pattern of his position as it was pictured by executives in a number of companies. To afford an inclusive view of the pattern, it is presented in outline form. TYPICAL DUTIES OF A FOREMAN I. Administer his own department A. Plan and schedule operations in his department in cooperation with any central planning unit B. Execute plans 1. Organize operations in terms of personnel, materials, and machines 2. Direct operations to attain standards of quality, quantity, economy, and safety 3. Keep department clean, orderly, and safe C. Develop subordinates D. Improve the efficiency of operations by the development of methods and processes E. Develop and maintain desirable personnel relations II. Cooperate with superiors, associates, and other departments in furthering general aims of the enterprise. III. Represent his management to his employees, and his employees to his management IV. Increase his fitness to meet present and new situations by improving his abilities and personality traits. Some Recent Changes in Typical Responsibilities Within the past score of years, some of the duties in this basic pattern have been shared increasingly with specialists. This was done because managers saw a need for greater precision in supervisory methods. During these years, managers introduced into factory organizations a variety of technicians: mechanical engineers, cost accountants, planning clerks, chemi- cal engineers, time-study men, and personnel officers. Each of these types 3 옣 ​was concerned with a phase of supervision which previously was dealt with by superintendents and foremen as only one of the aspects of their work. The evolution of the relationships between foremen and these staff spe- cialists has passed through a clearly defined cycle. First, there was a realization by top management of the burden placed upon direct supervisors by the need for more scientific management. Then specialists were introduced and given a free hand. They brought about rapid progress and, at times, an overdevelopment of particular managerial techniques. Unfortunately this partitioning of management into specialties divided the responsibility for results and caused a great deal of internal friction. The necessity of well-balanced supervision, localized in each de- partment, became more clearly recognized. Accordingly, the superintend- ents and foremen were again given control of operations, while the technical specialists were accorded powers of recommendation and a ready access to top management. This arrangement allows immediate supervision to bal- ance and provide for immediate operating needs; at the same time it sub- jects that supervision to progressive influences. Unfortunately, in some cases, the advisory powers of staff officers have not been strong enough to offset the tendency of operating executives to continue in established ways. The outcome of this evolution has been to require foremen to be versa- tile executives within small areas. They must understand all phases of supervision, and they must be able to use and adapt the ideas of experts, who study selected supervisory problems intensively. These responsibilities require a breadth of outlook and a willingness to collaborate with others that were not called for under the single lines of authority which character- ized production management several decades ago. Furthermore, the evolution has shown that each foreman necessarily must shoulder the responsibility for personnel management in his section. True, he can be advised in his personnel problems by specialists, but he must deal with those problems in his department when they arise. If he delegates their treatment to someone else, he is no longer the leader of his group. In recent years, this train of thought has caused executives to stress the foremen's responsibilities for personnel management. Broad developments of an economic and social nature also have served to emphasize the responsibility of foremen for the maintenance of satis- factory industrial relations. These relations were severely strained by the prolonged depression of the thirties, which disorganized industrial activity 4 and placed burdens of unemployment and hardship on millions of work- men and their families. Many employees and members of the public then turned to legislative programs which, they hoped, would alleviate their economic hardships. The result was federal and state legislation which regulated terms of employment and stimulated the growth of unionism. The rapid growth of unionism in the thirties emphasized many issues which can arise within the management-employee relationship. In many cases, the new unions aired long-standing grievances and pressed for limita- tions upon what had been considered management's prerogatives. Man- agers were concerned with the increased powers of their organized em- ployees and irritated by many of the demands which unions advanced. Foremen faced new personnel problems under these conditions. They not only were required to deal with a different attitude among employees from that to which they had been accustomed, but many of them for the first time had to understand and observe the terms of collective agreements which had been negotiated between company executives and the leaders of the organized employees. - Aside from the frictions generated by the depression and by the rapid growth of unionism, the personnel problems of foremen have been made more exacting by cultural developments among the working population. Over a period of years, the standards of treatment expected by young workers have been elevated by their experiences in the public schools and by the influence of the radio. Meanwhile, restrictions on immigration have prevented the infiltration of foreign-born workers to whom less considerate treatment might have been acceptable. Variations From the Basic Pattern The foregoing discussion presents some responsibilities which foremen commonly have, but it is to be remembered that each foreman's job in an organization is unique in some respects. The differences grow out of a number of circumstances. For one thing, each foreman's duties are molded by the technical processes in his department. In a highly mechanized sec- tion of one factory, for example, there are comparatively few workers. The foreman there gives most of his attention to mechanical problems. In an- other department, where there are many workers, the foreman's major duty is to direct his subordinates. Other circumstances were observed which commonly cause variations in the responsibilities of foremen. The ratio of special orders to total 5 production in the department was one of these. The rate of technical devel- opment was another, and the characteristics and attitudes of the workers was still another. Such differences support the principle previously stated: that the responsibilities of a supervisory position should be analyzed before a candidate is selected for it. Furthermore, its responsibilities should govern the program for the candidate's development.¹ Junior Supervisory Positions as Instruction Aids The existence of junior supervisory positions in some companies has facilitated the selection and development of prospective foremen. These positions were fairly common in large manufacturing departments. For instance, each section of one large department was in charge of a group leader. The group leaders reported to an assistant foreman, who dealt with many minor problems. He reported, in turn, to the foreman, who dealt with all major problems in the department. Some of these the fore- man took up with his superior, the division superintendent, who was in charge of several related departments. The positions of "group leader" and "assistant foreman" served supervisory functions primarily in this case, but they also served as training levels of increasing difficulty in a plan for the advancement of outstanding wage earners to the full rank of foreman. The arrangement can be adopted by companies which must expand their organizations rapidly, notwithstanding the fact that they have only a limited number of experienced foremen. They can delegate routine supervisory duties to new subforemen and reserve the more difficult aspects of supervi- sion for their experienced foremen. This expansion of the supervisory staff will enable them to increase their workforce to a marked degree, and especially is this true if they are to manufacture standardized products. Where subdivisions of supervisory work are contemplated, the duties of the new junior supervisory positions will naturally govern the selection and training of candidates for those positions. If the duties are simple, the training period can be short and the native capacity desired in candidates need only be moderate. As soon as a factory manager foresees a rapid expansion of his organ- ization, he should consider the advisability of subdividing the work of de- partmental supervision. If he decides to do that, he should design the 1 Specimen statements of the responsibilities attached to individual foremanships are presented in the Appendix. 6 junior supervisory positions, and then select and prepare men for them. He can upgrade leading workmen first in "section chief" positions, then in "assistant foreman" positions, until enough of the candidates are fitted for full foremanship rank. By this process, he can increase the supervisory capacity of his staff in a short period. Furthermore, he can minimize the risk involved in these promotions, since none will impose strange or mark- edly greater responsibilities upon the person promoted. It is now in order to review the responsibilities of subforemen more specifically. Responsibilities of Subforemen In a department having subforemen, employees are typically grouped by the types of machines they operate or by the type of product they are making. In the latter case, the employees work successively on units of product which they pass from hand to hand or have transported by con- veyor. Each group of this sort or possibly several similar groups are in charge of a leader.¹ Ten to fifteen workers are commonly found in such a group. In one company, the responsibilities of group leaders are specified as follows: RESPONSIBILITIES OF EACH GROUP LEADER IN A METAL WORKING ESTABLISHMENT2 - 1. Advise his foreman when additional men are needed in his section or when he has an excess of men in his section. 2. Be responsible for the quality of products turned out in his section. Notify his foreman of any condition which is interfering with quality of product. 3. Advise his foreman or the maintenance department representative when any equipment in his section is not operating up to standard. 4. Keep his section clean and orderly. 5. Instruct novices assigned to his section, or see to it that qualified work- men teach such novices. 6. Pass along to the members of his group any instruction or information that he is given for that purpose by his foreman. 1 These subforemen are given various titles, such as "supervisor," "section chief," "job master," and "lead man." 2 These were announced in April, 1939. 7 7. Assign the work of the section to individuals and coordinate their efforts so that the production schedule will be met. 8. See that shop rules are observed in his section. 9. Advise his foreman when the efficiency of any worker in his section drops below standard for any reason. 10. Cooperate with methods and time-study men in improving methods. and setting production standards. 11. Assist his foreman in rating the performance of each employee in his section. 12. Promote safe practices and see to it that safe practices are followed in his section. In another plant, "leaders" supervise squads of workers who assemble standardized products. Each leader, furthermore, represents his group in dealings with the foreman regarding conditions and assignments of work. The average number of group leaders reporting to a foreman in this plant is eight. Less than the standard production is expected from the leaders, because of their supervisory and representative responsibilities. They are hourly paid, and the prevailing differentials they receive range from 5 cents to 10 cents per hour above the earnings of the members of their groups, who are paid in proportion to group output. In still another company, which manufactures light machinery in a wide variety of models with special attachments, the work of departmental supervision is subdivided to a high degree. In one department, for example, the machines are operated by semiskilled workers, but adjusted by "job setters." Each job setter adjusts only a few varieties of machines. He does not assign work, but he sees that his machines are turning out a product of required quality, and he shares responsibility with the operators for the quality of the product as tested by inspectors. A job setter in this company is selected primarily for his mechanical ability, but his personality is considered also, since he is responsible for training the novices assigned to his section. The assistant foremen in this plant are in charge of subdivisions of large departments. An assistant foreman assigns work to his employees, and sees that his section is supplied with materials. If its production is interfered with for any reason, he learns the cause and has it corrected. In each large department, one of the assistant foremen is designated as first "assistant"; he serves as the head of the department in the absence of the foreman. 8 In this plan of organization each foreman is relieved of the immediate supervision of operations and he can concentrate on major problems or de- velopments within his department. These often pertain to unit costs, the balancing of the production schedule, and the improvement of processes. Moreover, the foreman deals with grievances, selects new employees, recommends transfers and promotions, and imposes discipline. And, be- cause he is concerned primarily with the smooth and effective running of the entire department, he must develop and coach his subforemen and job setters who are immediately in charge of operations. The departments in this plant typically perform many processes on numerous special orders, and they include from 30 to 150 employees. In companies which produce a limited variety of standardized items, the responsibilities of "foremen" resemble those of the assistant foremen in the case just described. A man in either group, regardless of his title, supervises a set of similar machines, or he supervises serialized processes. on a single item. He receives specific orders as to what is wanted, how much is wanted, and how soon it is wanted. Other departments provide materials and supplies and maintain the equipment. It remains for him to assign work, which has little variety, and to see that specified results are forthcoming from a comparatively small group of people. Although these supervisors have limited technical functions, they do exert an important influence upon the attitudes of their subordinates. From this review of the responsibilities of foremen and subforemen, it can be said that the training of "foremen" for small, simple departments. presents much the same considerations as the development of "subforemen❞ for large complex departments. The supervisory responsibilities in both cases are a moderate burden. The executives interviewed were confident of their ability to find men in their own organizations who could shoulder these responsibilities. The executives stated, however, that such new ap- pointees should be supervised intensively, and should be given an intensive course of background information immediately after their appointments.¹ The companies with large, complex departments viewed the selection and training of their foremen very much as other companies with simple departments viewed the selection and development of "general foremen," who coordinate the work of several related but simple departments. In 1 See pp. 34-35 for a discussion of such courses. 9 each case, the companies thought that an adequate number of suitable candi- dates could be found in the immediately lower classifications. Generally speaking, the companies which had many subforemen or group leaders were confident of the quality and numbers of their reserves for higher supervisory positions. More concern was expressed by companies in which small but fairly complex departments were to be rapidly expanded, and where no junior supervisory positions had been used to test and train prospective foremen. Responsibility Analysis A few of the companies had analyzed the responsibilities of their super- visory positions prior to making plans for the upgrading of the incumbents. Such analyses also are helpful in the selection and training of candidates for supervisory positions. For this reason, each foreman and subforeman, who is about to be advanced in rank, can be asked to analyze his responsi- bilities, perhaps with the assistance of a personnel officer. His statement then can be reviewed and corrected in a conference with his superior. If necessary, staff men can be called in to aid him in outlining his responsibili- ties which dovetail with theirs. S A The same procedure can be used in case the work of a foreman is to be subdivided and parts of it assigned to new subforemanships under his super- vision. Such a responsibility analysis of any supervisory position appears to be an essential step preparatory to the careful selection and development of a person to fill it. 10 CHAPTER II SELECTION OF CANDIDATES FOR TRAINING The executives interviewed in the course of this survey were unanimous in saying that they intended to obtain new supervisors from within their organizations if at all possible. Some of them were apprehensive that new positions would have to be filled before adequate programs for the selection and training of candidates could be completed. The companies which faced rapid expansion in 1941 planned to take action promptly on this problem which, some of the top executives agreed, was more critical than the threatened shortage of skilled labor at that time. Centering of Educational Responsibility There was general agreement that the responsibility for the selection and training of new supervisors should be centered upon the operating executives, since they can demonstrate the skills which the candidates should develop. The operating executives, moreover, are uniquely qualified to judge whether any trainee is worthy of advancement. The term "operating executives" is used here to designate the plant manager, his division super- intendents, and their foremen. It was pointed out, however, that the pressure of many other and mo- mentarily more pressing duties may cause some of these executives to neglect this educational work unless it is appropriately emphasized by the plant manager and by an officer on his staff. Such a staff officer, furthermore, can economize the time of operating executives by assisting them in planning and supervising the educational programs of prospective foremen. In this discussion, a staff officer with these duties will be termed an educational adviser.1 Survey of Probable Needs The selection of prospective supervisors should occur only after a survey and forecast of those needs in each division. These divisional forecasts can then be combined to indicate the total number of prospects to be developed. 1 See pp. 30 and 31 for a detailed discussion of an educational adviser's duties. } 11 In the forecast of supervisory needs of any division, the manager of the division and the educational adviser should consider the probable expansion of the division and the content of the new positions to be created. The major responsibilities attached to these new positions should be listed, even though some later revisions might be made. In addition to these con- siderations, the survey should include the positions which probably will become vacant because of the superannuation or promotion of the in- cumbents. Such divisional surveys then would indicate the number and the probable assignments of new foremen and subforemen in each division in the ensuing twelve to eighteen months. — It is advisable also to consider whether potential superintendents are in the existing foremen groups. For if none of the foremen in a given di- vision seems qualified for advancement, the management should add to it an experienced foreman who has potentialities for advancement beyond that rank. In most instances, however, the choices of candidates for fore- manship should be made with the idea that the candidates will be satisfied to hold that rank indefinitely. Qualifications Sought in Candidates The qualifications to be sought in prospective foremen can be deter- mined by a review of the responsibilities attached to supervisory positions. to be filled. Because of differences in those positions, the emphasis placed on given qualifications should vary from one case to another. Thus, in some departments, the nature of products or processes require foremen with extensive technical knowledge. For example, in one company which manu- factures electrical equipment, approximately 30 per cent of the foremen are qualified electrical engineers, and another 20 per cent are mechanical engineers. In a machinery manufacturing plant, some departments are headed by foremen with a thorough knowledge of hydraulics. This com- pany found that men who had "come up from the bench," but who lacked formal technical training, were not qualified to supervise those departments because of their inability to work effectively with the engineering staff. In other cases, foremen give much attention to planning and organiz- ing the work of their departments. This is evident, for instance, in com- paring the work of "tool-and-die" foremen with the work of foremen in charge of routine assembly operations. As a further example, a carton manufacturer stated that the processing of work to customers' orders neces- 12 sitated an unusually high degree of organizing ability on the part of the foreman of his printing department. In practice, it is often necessary to accept some compromise between the abilities ideally required for the performance of a job and those pos- sessed by the leading candidates available. Nevertheless, when executives draw up the ideal qualifications for a position on the basis of a job analysis, they are better equipped to select a candidate for it. This preparatory analysis helps them to determine whether the leading candidate has the ability to shoulder all of the major responsibilities of the position. Subject to the special requirements for specific positions, a general state- ment can be made of the qualifications of prospective foremen thought de- sirable by executives. These qualifications can be presented under three headings: health, technical skill, and personality traits. Health and Physical Characteristics The executives commonly give attention to a candidate's physical con- dition. In a few companies, a prospect is required to pass a physical ex- amination. In a majority, the general health record of each prospect is considered, since lack of health may impair his alertness, temperament, and attitudes. It is well recognized that a foreman must expend a great deal of nervous and physical energy in dealing with a considerable number and variety of details and problems under changing conditions. Furthermore, the responsibility for results from a certain section is placed squarely upon his shoulders. A dependable foreman is concerned whenever his depart- ment is not working smoothly or attaining its objectives fully. Not only does his work require sustained effort and concern, but it also requires him to exercise leadership and to energize others. Good health, therefore, is a basic requirement for foremanship; lack of it will disqualify a candidate at the outset." 1 Job Knowledge, Skill, and Learning Capacity There was general agreement that a prospective foreman should have been a good workman of the type he will supervise if he is promoted. Some executives held that technical qualifications were overstressed in the past, when the best workman in a section was usually earmarked as its next fore- man. These executives said that in their experience, the best workman in 1 Several executives attach some importance to such physical characteristics as height, weight, voice, and general appearance. י 13 a department was not necessarily qualified to be its foreman. They stated that many of their difficulties with employees were traceable to the fact that some foremen had been selected with too much regard to their technical knowledge and skill, and too little regard to their managerial qualities, personality, and character traits. It was generally agreed, however, that the prospective foreman should be a competent workman whose experience would help him to direct and judge the performance of subordinates in the same field. In addition, it was said that a candidate should be intelligent in a technical sense, by which was meant that he should have the desire and capacity to learn about and master processes in his field. Preference was expressed for a candidate who knows why things are done in approved Where new supervisors are to be developed within a short period, the intelligence requirement should be given more than its usual weight. ways. In a number of the cooperating companies, a prospective foreman's educational record is regarded as important. It is thought to be useful chiefly as evidence of general rather than specific qualifications. A credit- able record in school is said to indicate mental ability and qualities of in- tellectual initiative and application. Moreover, the subjects which the prospect has mastered are believed to reflect his interests and aptitudes. At present, the satisfactory completion of a high school course, trade school course, or an apprenticeship is regarded as a desirable minimum qualifica- tion of candidates for foremanship. This requirement is warranted in view of the fact that a large and growing proportion of manual workers can meet it. A particular type of schooling or experience should not be pre- scribed as a necessary qualification for foremanship, however, if there is a reasonable prospect that men without that qualification can become suc- cessful supervisors. M Personality Traits The importance of desirable personality traits in a prospective foreman was stressed by a number of executives who evidently had given careful thought to the entire problem. It was their conclusion that the develop- ment of personality and character traits is difficult in adults. They thought, therefore, that candidates for foremanship should possess such traits al- ready. They said that a candidate thus qualified could be taught simple managerial skills in a short time. The following list presents personality traits stressed by these executives. The several qualifications are not -- 14 to be regarded as absolutes. Each is thought desirable in some degree, but it doubtless will be needed to a greater degree in one position than in another. This check list, therefore, should be used with the requirements of the particular position definitely in mind. PERSONALITY TRAITS DESIRED IN A PROSPECTIVE FOREMAN 1. Applies himself to his work to an unusual degree. face of obstacles. Perseveres in the 2. Is dependable. Will do what he undertakes to do. Keeps promises. 3. Is willing to accept responsibility. This includes willingness to admit his own errors. 4. Has initiative and independence. Does his own thinking. 5. Is systematic and orderly. 6. Is sincerely interested in other people-their attitudes, satisfactions, and progress but is not overly sentimental or inquisitive. Respects the personalities, views, and rights of others. Safeguards any con- fidences given to him. Gladly talks with others and answers their questions. 7. Cooperates well. Is not unduly self-centered. 8. Is interested in a square deal, that is, he is concerned that other persons receive equitable treatment. 9. Is frank yet tactful. 10. Exercises self-control. Has poise, maturity, and stability. 11. Is decisive, but not opinionated; is willing to change a decision if he discovers sound reasons for the change. 12. Is able to adapt his views and methods to changed "conditions. Is pro- gressive and interested in improvements. 13. Is resourceful. 14. Exercises foresight in his work. 15. Reacts well to criticism. Can view himself and his work objectively. The executives, in selecting prospective foremen, prefer men over thirty years of age. This requirement was urged on the ground that ma- turity, poise, and stability of character could be expected in persons who had attained that age. One executive, in speaking of personality requirements, said: “It is advisable to consider the prospect's character and how he gets along with 15 his associates. His standing with them indicates to a considerable degree how he will deal with subordinates and whether he will be well regarded as a representative of the management." Sources of Prospective Foremen In the companies contributing to this study, new foremen have been obtained, with few exceptions, by promotions from lower ranks. As a rule, a new foreman has served for a number of years as a workman, then for a shorter period as a subforeman or as a staff man, before promotion to his present position. His prior experience with his company typically has cov- ered a period ranging from five to ten years. The groups from which foremen can be selected are: (1) subforemen, (2) staff specialists, and (3) the rank and file. Generally speaking, sub- foremen and staff specialists are preferred candidates because they have already been tested for foremanship in a number of ways. Subforemen, for example, have performed some of the simple elements of foremanship. Staff men, and particularly time-study or planning men, have performed duties which originally were split off from "all-round" foremen's jobs. Staff men would be competent, therefore, to deal with a few phases of a foreman's job, but they might be too highly specialized to perform the full range of duties. Further questions are whether some staff men would have the executive drive for foremanship and whether they would be competent to deal with industrial relations problems. If a need for many new fore- men suddenly arises, however, it should be possible through intensive train- ing to develop outstanding men in both of these groups for that level of responsibility.¹ The recent graduates of apprentice courses or of colleges are sometimes mentioned as prospective foremen. But the members of these groups. ordinarily are too young or inexperienced for supervisory responsibilities. Some of them doubtless will become prospective foremen after they have matured. The recent graduates of colleges preferably should be assigned to staff work, which will familiarize them with company operations and personnel and improve their understanding of the problems of the busi- ness, so that they can deal with those problems with due regard to the physical, financial, and human factors which govern and limit their treatment. 1 One executive thought that in case of a rapid expansion, his company would recall temporarily some foremen and superintendents on the retired list. 16 Several companies which had maintained their programs for recruiting college men during the thirties expressed satisfaction in 1940 that those programs had been maintained. These companies looked to the mature college graduates in their organizations to furnish a considerable number of new supervisors in 1941 and 1942. One large company, which had not continued such a recruiting program, reviewed its personnel records in 1940 and located a number of college graduates who had been hired during the depression years and had continued to work in routine positions. The com- pany in November, 1940, was observing those graduates in an endeavor to find potential supervisors in the group. In exceptional instances, some of the cooperating companies had gone outside of their organizations to obtain new foremen with special abilities which could not readily be developed in the companies themselves. Most of the firms, however, have developed practically all of their foremen within their organizations. The manufacturing processes of some of them are so unique that they could not obtain supervisors elsewhere with the required technical experience. Even where specialized experience is not of first importance, each company generally tries to obtain foremen by pro- motion. Thus, its new foremen are well acquainted with its organization, technical methods, and personnel. In addition, the promotions stimulate other men to work for advancement. K The rank and file is a source of foremen where the plan of organization does not provide for subforemen. Appointments from this source are risky, however, since even outstanding members of the rank and file usually have not been tested or trained for managerial responsibilities. Some large companies maintain records of outstanding employees who are regarded as "potential executives." Foremen, superintendents, and staff officers, who have the opportunity to observe members of the rank and file in the several divisions, are asked periodically to list employees whom they regard as in this group, and to keep them under observation. One of the cooperating steel companies, for example, keeps a special file of in- formation on each man concerning whose ability and promise three or more executives are agreed. The record of each man is not a series of formal ratings; rather it comprises informal notations about him which reflect the experiences and observations of executives. 17 Courses as Aids to the Selection of Candidates Four of the companies visited were offering courses to help them select leading workmen for group-leader or staff positions. These companies had been able to judge the manual proficiency, application, and technical knowledge of candidates, but they needed the courses as aids in determining the candidates' personality traits, ability to grasp managerial concepts, and ability to express ideas. Each course presents information on the organization and policies of the company offering it, and each is open to a limited number of selected members of the rank and file.' The meetings of such courses are held weekly on company time, but the members are expected to read notes or informative pamphlets on their own time. The class sessions are given over to talks and discussions of personnel policies and production problems. The discussions serve to reveal the comparative abilities of the members. Examinations on factual material are given periodically to test the ability of the individuals to grasp and to explain managerial problems and pro- cedures. Each company is careful to impress upon the members that its course is given primarily for their information, and that attendance throughout the course does not assure anyone of promotion. 2 Another selective course was offered by Pennsylvania State College in one plant of the Aluminum Company of America. In this case, four tests were used in selecting applicants for admission to the course: 1. The Otis Higher Form A, a test of mental ability, or, as it is com- monly called, an intelligence test. The persons in charge of the course assigned to this test a weight of forty points out of a total of one hundred. 2. The Bernreuter Personality Inventory (scored for neurotic ten- dencies), a test of emotional stability. This test received a weight of thirty points on the basis that "control of the emotions" is definitely required. of foremen. 3. The Minnesota Paper Form Boards, a test for mechanical aptitude. This test received a weight of twenty points. 4. The Strong Vocational Interest Test, scored for production man- ager. This particular test compares the likes and dislikes of an individual 1 A selective course in industrial management was being given (November, 1940) at another company by representatives of a technical school. The course was announced by posters, and applicants were selected by representatives of the school on the basis of educational record, business experience, and score on an intelligence test. The students were given some practical problems which called for analysis and recommendations. The grades of each student were given to him and to the company. The company expected that the course would identify employees of promise who had been overlooked. 2 The case is described by Lyle R. Mercer in Personnel, Vol. 17, No. 2 (November, 1940), pp. 89–96. 18 • for different activities, types of people, kinds of work, etc., with the likes and dislikes of successful production managers for the same things. This test received a weight of ten points. After completion of the course, a final ranking of the candidates was made on the basis of several factors: the instructors opinion; scores made on examinations; grades on projects, outside reading and notebooks; and the selective test scores. Near the end of the course, thirty-six of its mem- bers were picked at random and were ranked by their supervisors. There was a close agreement between the supervisors' rankings and the final grades of the men in the course. Superficially, this might indicate that the tests and the course were not necessary aids to the selection of candidates for supervisory training. This conclusion is unwarranted, however, since the supervisors had never thought of sixteen of the men as potential executives. In fact, they had observed only nine of them from that point of view. "It was only after these (six- teen) men had been selected for the training course that the supervisors began to pay close attention to them." This experience suggests that an informative course, open to volunteers from the rank and file who pass suitable tests, may serve to bring forward new and promising candidates for supervisory training. Subjects for a Brief Selective Course A company which intends to offer such a brief selective course to suitably qualified members of the rank and file can readily outline it on the basis of the major functions of the organization. A review of three such courses was the basis for the following composite program of topics: 1. Origins and development of the business. 2. Major products or services, and their sales appeals; competing products or services; how the factory can help to make sales and to keep customer good will 3. Purchasing organization and policies 4. Warehousing of raw materials 5. Plant layout and the economical handling of materials 6. The design, installation, and maintenance of equipment 7. Selection, transfer, and promotion of employees 8. Production standards 9. The planning and scheduling of work 19 10. Job evaluation and incentive plans used by the company 11. Cost control 12. The supervisor's responsibilities 13. Employee benefit plans 14. Shipping, traffic, and customer service 15. Office contacts with customers (including billing, credits, collec- tions, and adjustments) 16. Financing the business 17. Legislation and taxation affecting the business 18. Development of products and processes 19. The outlook for the business In each of a number of large companies, a comprehensive course is given to outstanding employees to acquaint them with a number of the company's major departments, and to assist each man and the company to select the type of work for which he seems suited. One of these companies, for example, has a three-year course for graduate apprentices, graduate engineers, and outstanding members of the rank and file. Members of the course are given a series of temporary assignments in a number of the com- pany's departments. The members thus develop manual and clerical skills, and they acquire a great deal of knowledge about company operations. The course is not intended to develop prospective foremen directly, however. Rather it is a general program for selected young men, of whom some later will be highly versatile employees in manual or clerical work, and others will be technicians, salesmen, or supervisors, depending on their individual interests and aptitudes, and upon the company's needs.¹ This 1 The course requires definite accomplishments in shop, school, and gymnasium. The shop training program for technically trained men differs from the program for journeymen, but each requires a mini- mum of seventy-two weeks. For the remainder of the time, each man is used on shop or office work, according to his aptitudes and according to company needs. One written report is required each quarter on a subject of the student's choice. The school requirements are: attendance of two hours per week; preparation of home assignments; a grade of at least 75 per cent, determined by recitations and examinations; and a written report on an assigned subject each quarter. The school curriculum is as follows: 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 1st Quarter Introductory Course Business Letters Engineering Control Engineering Staff Functions Company Machines 2nd Quarter Materials & Products Special Problems Business Letters Job Training Foremanship 3rd Quarter Materials & Products Company Organiza- tion Effective Expression Company Machines Foremanship 4th Quarter Materials & Products Company Organiza- tion Effective Expression Company Machines Foremanship Company Machines Quality Control Product Develop- ment The gymnasium requirements are: attendance at least one hour per week, and performance satisfactory to the gymnasium instructor. i 20 company can doubtless obtain some prospective supervisors among the graduates of this course, but they will require further intensive training. Another company, without such a course, could establish other means for selecting prospective foremen more quickly among the wage earners and the subforemen in its organization. Rapid Expansion of Supervisory Forces The national defense program, beginning in 1940 after a decade of re- stricted industrial activity, found many companies faced with the need for large numbers of new supervisors. One metal manufacturing company, for example, required three hundred new foremen within a relatively short pe- riod of time. This firm advertised for candidates within its own organization and also in selected metal-manufacturing centers. The notices on the plant bulletin boards stated a preferred age range, and explained that applicants would have to pass a thorough physical examination. The notices further stated that candidates would be given intelligence and personality tests and would be carefully interviewed. The notices directed interested persons to communicate with the employment department. The foremen also were asked to recommend candidates for consideration, a step which brought forth a number of desirable men who had not responded to the bulletins. The company reported that the applicants on the whole were satisfac- tory; it attributed this result to the clear statement of conditions in the posted notices. The candidates selected from within the organization in- cluded members of the rank and file, graduate apprentices, and graduates of technical schools. Several of the last named had graduated in the depres- sion years and had been unable to obtain technical employment thereafter. The advertising outside the plant was placed in newspapers in several cities. These advertisements specified that engineering graduates with five to ten years of industrial experience were desired as candidates for super- visory work. The response in the fall of 1940 was satisfactory. After a pre- liminary study of each applicant's record or letter, the preferred individuals were given an intelligence test and a personality test. In addition, each was thoroughly interviewed by an expert. Moreover, the experience record of each preferred applicant was verified. In this way, the company selected a number of prospective supervisors from outside its organization. These men and the candidates from within the company were then entered in an inten- sive training course. 21 Trends Affecting the Supply of Candidates A number of executives referred to developments in recent years, which, in their opinion, have made the position of foreman less attractive to work- men than it had been. One of these developments has been the narrow- ing of the preferential advantages which foremen previously enjoyed. In these years, for example, sickness benefits, vacations, and unemployment compensation have been granted to many workmen, whereas previously these privileges were granted almost exclusively to supervisors. Another factor which has reduced the desire of some workmen to become foremen, has been the payment of one and one-half times the regular hourly wage for any work in excess of eight hours per day or forty hours per week. Such overtime compensation ordinarily has not been granted to foremen. Be- cause of these arrangements, workmen in some companies have received weekly earnings which closely approached and sometimes even exceeded the weekly earnings of their foremen. Furthermore, in the past twenty years, the discretion exercised by many foremen has been circumscribed by the development of the techniques of scientific management, and by the establishment of checks and balances within managerial organizations. Many processes have become subject to close controls, set up by top managers and administered by inspectors, chemical engineers, cost accountants, and other technicians. These controls focus directly upon the foremen. Again, many companies no longer permit foremen to select or discharge employees without the collaboration and ap- proval of their personnel departments. Channels of appeal have been established through which individual employees or their representatives can denounce a foreman's actions to top management. This system of checks and balances subjects a foreman to pressures from both his superiors. and the organized employees. Several executives said that shop stewards in their plants had carried too many complaints beyond the foremen to super- intendents, and that this practice had undermined the status of foremen. Similarly, in some plants, foremen's positions had become more difficult because labor unions had pressed the foremen to relax production standards or departmental rules and discipline. G Finally, under the National Labor Relations Act, as it has been ad- ministered, a foreman must bear with troublesome employees who are active unionists until he has clear-cut evidence to support their discharge on grounds of unsatisfactory workmanship or conduct. Otherwise, any such employee, if discharged, can allege that he was dismissed because of his 22 union membership. His appeal to the regional office of the National Labor Relations Board results in an investigation which puts both the foreman and his company on the defensive. These developments of recent years have impaired the morale of fore- men and have made their positions less attractive to members of the rank and file. It is recommended, therefore, that managers review the status, security, and compensation of foremen in their organizations and see to it that the training, compensation, and executive support of foremen measure up fully to their exacting responsibilities. Unionism and the Selection of Prospective Foremen Some executives, particularly in the metal trades, expressed the view that unionism had made the discovery of supervisory talent among em- ployees a more difficult task. These executives contended that unionism had restrained individual workmen from showing evidence of their po- tential ability. This problem was not generally cited, however. A num- ber of managers reported that unionism had caused them no difficulties in identifying workmen with outstanding qualities. Other barriers to the discovery and selection of prospective foremen from among organized employees were also mentioned. Several execu- tives expressed doubt as to the fitness of active unionists for supervisory responsibilities. As the principal reason for this view, it was stated that supervisors sometimes have to insist upon compliance with work standards and shop rules, which the employees wish to have relaxed, and that a supervisor, who until recently has been a spokesman for his employees in these matters, finds it difficult to oppose their desires. Furthermore, execu- tives pointed out that many union members had developed and expressed anti-company attitudes which could not be reconciled with the obligations of foremanship. In several cases, moreover, it was reported that union officials who had been appointed to supervisory tasks were distrusted by the rank and file. Fear on the part of unionists that management might weaken their or- ganizations by the appointment of their leaders to supervisory jobs is re- sponsible for the clauses in some collective agreements which prohibit management from offering such positions to union officials during their terms of office, and for a designated period after those terms have expired. It would seem desirable, therefore, for management to exercise care in the selection of active unionists for supervisory responsibilities. 23 In several of the cooperating companies, men who had previously been active unionists proved to be highly satisfactory when promoted to super- visory jobs. Executives in these companies believed that the real ability of these men had not found expression until an opportunity had been pro- vided by the advent of the union. Unionism in these cases had aided management by bringing to light the latent or unnoticed abilities of some employees. Approximately thirty executives were asked whether the fact that a man was an active unionist would cause them to hesitate to appoint him to a foremanship, even though they thought him well qualified for the position. A large majority replied that they would not hesitate to make such an appointment. Several companies reported that unions tried to have seniority rules. govern appointments to supervisory positions. Under certain circumstances, no harm would be done by following such rules. Thus, if a manager is considering merely the appointment of a straw boss, and the senior man in the employee group has sufficient ability for the promotion, a seniority rule would seem to work no hardship. But, if this senior man has little further potentiality, his promotion may lead to difficulties for himself, his manager, and probably the employees whom he then is supervising. This will occur in case he blocks a channel of promotion because of his incapacity for further advancement. In that event he will have to be by-passed in some way. By pointing out such difficulties, some companies have convinced labor organi- zations that promotions should not be governed by seniority, although the companies have conceded that seniority should always be a consideration. Several companies have been able to convince unions that all parties in time would suffer if seniority rules prevented the promotion of outstand- ing men. On the other hand, these companies realize that apparent disre- gard of seniority in making a promotion is disliked by employees. There- fore, the companies call union leaders in and explain to them why, in such cases, the apparent abilities of the persons selected for promotion have been deemed more important than their seniority. Importance of Initial Selection The initial promotion of workmen to minor supervisory positions de- serves great care, since persons unwisely chosen for such promotions suffer the experience and record of failure later. Furthermore, the loss of the investment in their training is to be considered. A number of executives have concluded, therefore, that the qualifications of prospective supervisors 24 should be reviewed by several persons in conference, and that the recom- mendations of these persons should guide the manager who has the re- sponsibility of making the appointment. Collective judgment in such a case will tend to be less biased than the judgment of an individual. Un- fortunate experiences were cited in which supervisors had selected prospec- tive foremen on inadequate grounds or with reference to incidents which were not typical in the candidate's record. Some prospective foremen, for example, had been chosen because of the quality of their workmanship, others because they were "quantity producers," still others because they helped to meet an emergency in the past, and still others because they were "two-fisted men." Bias in the selection of junior supervisors seems to have been sufficiently widespread to suggest the need for a better preparation for such choices on the part of managers and foremen. Specifically, it is suggested that the bases of selection for a given supervisory position should be discussed in advance by the men who are to judge the candidates. The executives con- cerned should agree upon the qualifications to be sought in the candidates. A second suggestion is that time-study men and industrial engineers should assist in the selection of junior supervisors. These staff men can mention employees who have learned new methods readily and who have been willing to cooperate in development work. Staff men thus can aid in judging the intelligence, adaptability, and personality traits of prospec- tive foremen. Such preparation for the selection of prospective foremen should be made without delay by companies which are on the threshold of marked expansion. In each factory division, the superintendent, the foremen, and the staff men should confer and decide upon the qualities desired in candi- dates for given supervisory positions in the division. The foremen and staff officers in each division should be asked to designate promising em- ployees and to observe them closely. In this way, these officers will be better able to select the men who are to be given the preparatory training. A food manufacturing company which has given careful attention to the initial selection of prospective supervisors uses the following procedure: 1. Each prospect is interviewed and rated by at least three executives, usually his foreman, the personnel officer, and the superintendent of the position to be filled. 2. Each prospect is required to take a mental test and a physical ex- amination. 25 3. The record of each prospect is studied. 4. The executives who have interviewed the prospects for a position meet in conference to review the data and to nominate the best candidate for the vacancy. This nomination is sent to the plant manager. 'Potentiality Ratings The forms on pages 28 and 29 are suggested as aids to executives in their selection of prospects for supervisory work. The first provides for ratings of personal qualifications in view of the requirements of a particular position. As regards each trait, the individual candidate is graded as being deficient, adequate, or superior. The check marks regarding any quality can be placed at any location on the horizontal line to indicate the degree to which the individual is thought adequate for the position in that respect. Because this type of rating often refers to abstract qualities which, even if favorably rated, do not assure the competence of a candidate, it is sug- gested that candidates be rated on the degree to which they are deemed competent to shoulder each of the major responsibilities of the position for which they are being considered. The form on page 29 is designed according to this view. It calls for the rater's judgment of a candidate's ap- parent ability to perform each major duty of a position. Preferably, the duties should be arranged in the order of their importance, so that degree of competence for the most important duties will be given the greatest weight in the selection. Difficulties with ratings of personality traits have developed because the meanings given the terms and the standards of judgment used by the raters are not uniform. For these reasons, some companies insist that ratings be made in the presence of a personnel officer who can advise the raters regarding the meanings of the terms and of the standards to be used. Again, raters are not always given sufficient opportunity to judge the specified abilities of individuals before they the raters are required to put their opinions on record. If ratings of personal qualities are desired, the raters should be given several weeks in which to observe the stated qual- ities of promising men before noting their opinions in writing. Judgments of each prospect by several raters are highly desirable to correct bias, al- though in some instances only a candidate's foreman has been sufficiently well acquainted with him to express opinions on his qualities. This is not a satisfactory condition, since the responsibility for initial selection then rests with one man. Cli · 1 26 In a few of the companies surveyed, psychological tests were used in the initial selection of minor supervisors. In some companies, such tests were used in the selection of apprentices, and in the event that any of the apprentices were considered later for minor supervisory work, some weight was given to the test results. Executives in most of the companies, how- ever, did not favor the use of psychological tests. These executives were of the opinion that if reliable results were to be obtained from psychological tests, the investigations should be carried on by competent psychologists. Few of the executives thought that the tests were needed to an extent which would warrant the employment of these experts. The executives thought that the potential supervisory ability of candidates could be de- termined by careful observation and rating. It appears that the real question here is whether managers wish to re- duce somewhat further the probable error in the initial selection of candi- dates for foremanship. Psychological tests might reduce that error by predicting the success of individuals who had had no opportunity to exercise supervisory responsibility. Evidently most of the executives consulted had decided to rely upon trial assignments of such individuals to minor supervisory jobs as the means for testing their probable success in more responsible supervisory positions. The outcome of this policy will depend on the degree to which the assignments used for purposes of test are care- fully selected, and actually do require abilities which are the same as those required for the higher supervisory positions. Furthermore, the success of the policy will depend on the ability of the supervisors to judge the personal qualities of outstanding subordinates. A number of managers admitted that their foremen had not been instructed sufficiently in this important matter. This chapter has dealt with some considerations affecting the initial selection of candidates for foremanship. After such selection, they should be given information and practical assignments which will train them for supervisory responsibilities and test them more conclusively. 27 Position Candidate QUALIFICATION DESIRED Health Technical knowledge and skill Application and perseverance Dependability Acceptance of responsibility Initiative Orderliness Interest in people Willingness to cooperate RATING OF PERSONAL QUALITIES Date Rating by RATING OF CANDIDATE'S QUALIFICATIONS Adequate for POSITION Requirement 3 DEFICIENT FOR POSITION Requirement 1 2 4 SUPERIOR TO POSITION REQUIREMENT 5 6 28 Position Candidate RATING OF CANDIDATE'S PROBABLE PERFORMANCE MAJOR DUTIES OF POSITION (Listed in order of importance) Supervise personnel engaged in pipe line repairs, etc. Promote safe practices among repair crew Plan layout of pipe work Secure contractors for large re- pair jobs Keep costs within approved stand- ards Estimate cost of pipe work Enter suitable charge numbers on repair vouchers Secure purchase requisitions for all contract orders See that hours and working con- ditions follow company policy| EXCELLENT Date Rating by RATING OF PROBABLE PERFORMANCE ABOVE THE REQUIREMENT BELOW THE Requirement ACCEPTABLE FAILURE A 29 CHAPTER III HELPING CANDIDATES TO UNDERSTAND SUPERVISORY PROBLEMS The objectives in the preparatory training of prospective foremen may be grouped under three major headings: to promote understanding of com- pany policies and practices; to develop supervisory skills; and to improve personality traits. It is now in order to review these objectives somewhat specifically and to discuss educational methods for developing prospective foremen along these lines. Most of the companies surveyed were optimistic with regard to their ability to train men for foremanship. There was little expression of the concept that foremen are "born and cannot be made." Rather the execu- tives thought that satisfactory candidates could be obtained in their organi- zations and that these candidates could be trained for supervisory respon- sibilities. Only a few executives were pessimistic or indifferent with regard to such preparatory training and were unwilling to invest time and effort in that direction. It was their thought that individuals should be tried as foremen and, if found wanting, should be replaced. Such a policy, however, is not likely to be pursued in a company for any length of time. The advancement of an individual from the ranks to a supervisory position imposes many new responsibilities upon him for which he should be pre- pared. Otherwise, the risk of his failure is large, and the failure of any such appointee is costly, not only in a financial sense because of production failures, but it also is costly in the loss of employee confidence in the management. Staff Assistance to Operating Executives A previous section stated that the responsibility for the selection and development of prospective foremen should be centered in the operating executives. It was noted, however, that these long-range endeavors, which have little immediate effect, tend to be neglected by operating executives unless correctives and aids are furnished by top management and a staff officer. The services of such a staff officer can be listed as follows: 30 1. He assists in forecasting the needs for new supervisors in each division and in determining the qualities to be sought in candidates. The operating executives are primarily responsible for making these analyses. 2. He assists these executives in planning specific training programs for individual prospects or groups of prospects. The plans cover the specific objectives of training in individual cases, the training methods to be used, by whom the training is to be given, and the duration of the training effort. 3. He aids the operating executives in carrying through these plans. This aid includes the direction of conferences of foremen and superintend- ents on the selection and development of prospective foremen. The staff officer's aid includes also the preparation of instruction materials or mono- graphs and the arrangement of transfers and work assignments. 4. He observes the progress of each trainee, to judge how well the edu- cational plans for the individual are being carried out, and to suggest re- visions in the plans. 5. He counsels and maintains the morale of individual trainees, helps them meet the criticisms of their supervisors and associates, and assists them in the improvement of their personality traits. The trainees are told that they individually are free to go to the staff officer for counsel on personal difficulties encountered during their training periods. Such staff officers have been appointed in a number of the companies visited in the course of this survey. Each of these officers has time for the detailed oversight of educational activities in individual cases, and he is qualified to guide the program as a whole. He is selected for his resource- fulness in planning and arranging educational assignments, and for his abili- ty to motivate others to participate in educational efforts. He works as an equal with division superintendents, formulates plans in cooperation with them, and observes the execution of those plans. This staff work is a full- time or a part-time assignment, depending on the number of supervisors to be trained. In normal times, most of the training of prospective foremen occurs as they work under the supervision of experienced foremen and technicians. Many of these instructors need stimulation, guidance, and assistance in carrying on their educational responsibilities, and these aids can be provided by a competent educational adviser. Individualized Instruction The development of prospective foremen is concerned in part with the improvement of skills and personality traits. These changes are brought 31 about by practice under guidance in junior supervisory positions, which sometimes are created temporarily for the purpose. This type of training necessarily involves individualized instruction. More basically, instruction is individualized because different skills are required in the future positions of the candidates, and because personality differences exist among the men themselves. Furthermore, under normal conditions, candidates are selected and their training launched as needs for them become evident. Thus in small companies only one candidate may be started at a time. There seems to be some tendency in larger firms to start several candidates together so as to facilitate the informative instruction, which can readily be given in group meetings. And in 1940 the unusual demand for new supervisors caused many companies to begin much larger "classes" of prospective fore- men than had been their practice. It is to be remembered, nevertheless, that group instruction of an in- formative nature is but one phase of the educational program. General infor- mation can thus be presented to prospective foremen and the intragroup discussion can stimulate their thinking and bring about changes in their attitudes. But even more important to the rounded development of super- visory candidates is individualized instruction which can be fitted to the specific needs of different personalities and positions. Formal courses, definitely labeled as preparatory for foremanship, were disapproved by the executives interviewed. A number of them ran such courses in the twenties, but found it difficult to gauge their needs for new foremen closely. They realized then that they might train more candidates. than could be given positions. This they knew would cause intense dis- satisfaction among the trainees. Another difficulty with such a formal course is the definite time schedule according to which it is operated. If a candidate is not advanced according to the schedule, he is likely to become. dissatisfied. Preferably, the means for testing and training prospective supervisors should not thus arouse their expectation of stated promotions. at definite dates. Furthermore, a formal preparatory course for prospective foremen tends to have a discouraging effect upon ambitious men who have not been appointed to the group. They naturally feel that they are not being considered for advancement so long as they remain outside. Perhaps the chief objection to a standardized preforemanship course, however, is that the program ordinarily is not focused sharply enough upon the specific preparation which a prospect for a given supervisory position should have. The existence of this type of course, moreover, has caused some executives to neglect individualized instruction. 32 should be reviewed by several persons in conference, and that the recom- mendations of these persons should guide the manager who has the re- sponsibility of making the appointment. Collective judgment in such a case will tend to be less biased than the judgment of an individual. Un- fortunate experiences were cited in which supervisors had selected prospec- tive foremen on inadequate grounds or with reference to incidents which were not typical in the candidate's record. Some prospective foremen, for example, had been chosen because of the quality of their workmanship, others because they were "quantity producers," still others because they helped to meet an emergency in the past, and still others because they were "two-fisted men." Bias in the selection of junior supervisors seems to have been sufficiently widespread to suggest the need for a better preparation for such choices on the part of managers and foremen. Specifically, it is suggested that the bases of selection for a given supervisory position should be discussed in advance by the men who are to judge the candidates. The executives con- cerned should agree upon the qualifications to be sought in the candidates. A second suggestion is that time-study men and industrial engineers should assist in the selection of junior supervisors. These staff men can mention employees who have learned new methods readily and who have been willing to cooperate in development work. Staff men thus can aid in judging the intelligence, adaptability, and personality traits of prospec- tive foremen. Such preparation for the selection of prospective foremen should be made without delay by companies which are on the threshold of marked expansion. In each factory division, the superintendent, the foremen, and the staff men should confer and decide upon the qualities desired in candi- dates for given supervisory positions in the division. The foremen and staff officers in each division should be asked to designate promising em- ployees and to observe them closely. In this way, these officers will be better able to select the men who are to be given the preparatory training. A food manufacturing company which has given careful attention to the initial selection of prospective supervisors uses the following procedure: 1. Each prospect is interviewed and rated by at least three executives, usually his foreman, the personnel officer, and the superintendent of the position to be filled. 2. Each prospect is required to take a mental test and a physical ex- amination. 25 3. The record of each prospect is studied. 4. The executives who have interviewed the prospects for a position meet in conference to review the data and to nominate the best candidate for the vacancy. This nomination is sent to the plant manager. Potentiality Ratings The forms on pages 28 and 29 are suggested as aids to executives in their selection of prospects for supervisory work. The first provides for ratings of personal qualifications in view of the requirements of a particular position. As regards each trait, the individual candidate is graded as being deficient, adequate, or superior. The check marks regarding any quality can be placed at any location on the horizontal line to indicate the degree to which the individual is thought adequate for the position in that respect. Because this type of rating often refers to abstract qualities which, even if favorably rated, do not assure the competence of a candidate, it is sug- gested that candidates be rated on the degree to which they are deemed competent to shoulder each of the major responsibilities of the position for which they are being considered. The form on page 29 is designed according to this view. It calls for the rater's judgment of a candidate's ap- parent ability to perform each major duty of a position. Preferably, the duties should be arranged in the order of their importance, so that degree of competence for the most important duties will be given the greatest weight in the selection. Difficulties with ratings of personality traits have developed because the meanings given the terms and the standards of judgment used by the raters are not uniform. For these reasons, some companies insist that ratings be made in the presence of a personnel officer who can advise the raters regarding the meanings of the terms and of the standards to be used. Again, raters are not always given sufficient opportunity to judge the specified abilities of individuals before they-the raters—are required to put their opinions on record. If ratings of personal qualities are desired, the raters should be given several weeks in which to observe the stated qual- ities of promising men before noting their opinions in writing. Judgments of each prospect by several raters are highly desirable to correct bias, al- though in some instances only a candidate's foreman has been sufficiently well acquainted with him to express opinions on his qualities. This is not a satisfactory condition, since the responsibility for initial selection then rests with one man. 26 In a few of the companies surveyed, psychological tests were used in the initial selection of minor supervisors. In some companies, such tests were used in the selection of apprentices, and in the event that any of the apprentices were considered later for minor supervisory work, some weight was given to the test results. Executives in most of the companies, how- ever, did not favor the use of psychological tests. These executives were of the opinion that if reliable results were to be obtained from psychological tests, the investigations should be carried on by competent psychologists. Few of the executives thought that the tests were needed to an extent which would warrant the employment of these experts. The executives thought that the potential supervisory ability of candidates could be de- termined by careful observation and rating. It appears that the real question here is whether managers wish to re- duce somewhat further the probable error in the initial selection of candi- dates for foremanship. Psychological tests might reduce that error by predicting the success of individuals who had had no opportunity to exercise supervisory responsibility. Evidently most of the executives consulted had decided to rely upon trial assignments of such individuals to minor supervisory jobs as the means for testing their probable success in more responsible supervisory positions. The outcome of this policy will depend on the degree to which the assignments used for purposes of test are care- fully selected, and actually do require abilities which are the same as those required for the higher supervisory positions. Furthermore, the success of the policy will depend on the ability of the supervisors to judge the personal qualities of outstanding subordinates. A number of managers admitted that their foremen had not been instructed sufficiently in this important matter. M This chapter has dealt with some considerations affecting the initial selection of candidates for foremanship. After such selection, they should be given information and practical assignments which will train them for supervisory responsibilities and test them more conclusively. 27 Position Candidate QUALIFICATION DESIRED Health Technical knowledge and skill Application and perseverance Dependability Acceptance of responsibility Initiative Orderliness Interest in people Willingness to cooperate RATING OF PERSONAL QUALITIES Date Rating by RATING OF CANDIDATE'S QUALIFICATIONS ADEQUATE FOR POSITION REQUIREMENT 3 DEFICIENT FOR POSITION REquirement 1 2 P 4 SUPERIOR TO POSITION REQuirement 5 6 28 Position Candidate RATING OF CANDIDATE'S PROBABLE PERFORMANCE MAJOR DUTIES OF POSITION (Listed in order of importance) Supervise personnel engaged in pipe line repairs, etc. Promote safe safe practices among repair crew Plan layout of pipe work Secure contractors for large re- pair jobs Keep costs within approved stand- ards Estimate cost of pipe work Enter suitable charge numbers on repair vouchers Secure purchase requisitions for all contract orders See that hours and working con- ditions follow company policy| EXCELLENT Date Rating by RATING OF PROBABLE PERFORMANCE ABOVE THE REQUIREMENT BELOW THE RequiremeNT ACCEPTABLE K FAILURE 29 · CHAPTER III HELPING CANDIDATES TO UNDERSTAND SUPERVISORY PROBLEMS The objectives in the preparatory training of prospective foremen may be grouped under three major headings: to promote understanding of com- pany policies and practices; to develop supervisory skills; and to improve personality traits. It is now in order to review these objectives somewhat specifically and to discuss educational methods for developing prospective foremen along these lines. Most of the companies surveyed were optimistic with regard to their ability to train men for foremanship. There was little expression of the concept that foremen are "born and cannot be made." Rather the execu- tives thought that satisfactory candidates could be obtained in their organi- zations and that these candidates could be trained for supervisory respon- sibilities. Only a few executives were pessimistic or indifferent with regard to such preparatory training and were unwilling to invest time and effort in that direction. It was their thought that individuals should be tried as foremen and, if found wanting, should be replaced. Such a policy, however, is not likely to be pursued in a company for any length of time. The advancement of an individual from the ranks to a supervisory position. imposes many new responsibilities upon him for which he should be pre- pared. Otherwise, the risk of his failure is large, and the failure of any such appointee is costly, not only in a financial sense because of production failures, but it also is costly in the loss of employee confidence in the management. Staff Assistance to Operating Executives A previous section stated that the responsibility for the selection and development of prospective foremen should be centered in the operating executives. It was noted, however, that these long-range endeavors, which have little immediate effect, tend to be neglected by operating executives unless correctives and aids are furnished by top management and a staff officer. The services of such a staff officer can be listed as follows: • 30 1. He assists in forecasting the needs for new supervisors in each division and in determining the qualities to be sought in candidates. The operating executives are primarily responsible for making these analyses. 2. He assists these executives in planning specific training programs for individual prospects or groups of prospects. The plans cover the specific objectives of training in individual cases, the training methods to be used, by whom the training is to be given, and the duration of the training effort. 3. He aids the operating executives in carrying through these plans. This aid includes the direction of conferences of foremen and superintend- ents on the selection and development of prospective foremen. The staff officer's aid includes also the preparation of instruction materials or mono- graphs and the arrangement of transfers and work assignments. 4. He observes the progress of each trainee, to judge how well the edu- cational plans for the individual are being carried out, and to suggest re- visions in the plans. 5. He counsels and maintains the morale of individual trainees, helps them meet the criticisms of their supervisors and associates, and assists them in the improvement of their personality traits. The trainees are told that they individually are free to go to the staff officer for counsel on personal difficulties encountered during their training periods. Such staff officers have been appointed in a number of the companies visited in the course of this survey. Each of these officers has time for the detailed oversight of educational activities in individual cases, and he is qualified to guide the program as a whole. He is selected for his resource- fulness in planning and arranging educational assignments, and for his abili- ty to motivate others to participate in educational efforts. He works as an equal with division superintendents, formulates plans in cooperation with them, and observes the execution of those plans. This staff work is a full- time or a part-time assignment, depending on the number of supervisors to be trained. In normal times, most of the training of prospective foremen occurs as they work under the supervision of experienced foremen and technicians. Many of these instructors need stimulation, guidance, and assistance in carrying on their educational responsibilities, and these aids. can be provided by a competent educational adviser. Q Individualized Instruction The development of prospective foremen is concerned in part with the improvement of skills and personality traits. These changes are brought 31 about by practice under guidance in junior supervisory positions, which sometimes are created temporarily for the purpose. This type of training necessarily involves individualized instruction. More basically, instruction is individualized because different skills are required in the future positions of the candidates, and because personality differences exist among the men themselves. Furthermore, under normal conditions, candidates are selected and their training launched as needs for them become evident. Thus in small companies only one candidate may be started at a time. There seems to be some tendency in larger firms to start several candidates together so as to facilitate the informative instruction, which can readily be given in group meetings. And in 1940 the unusual demand for new supervisors caused many companies to begin much larger "classes" of prospective fore- men than had been their practice. It is to be remembered, nevertheless, that group instruction of an in- formative nature is but one phase of the educational program. General infor- mation can thus be presented to prospective foremen and the intragroup discussion can stimulate their thinking and bring about changes in their attitudes. But even more important to the rounded development of super- visory candidates is individualized instruction which can be fitted to the specific needs of different personalities and positions. Formal courses, definitely labeled as preparatory for foremanship, were disapproved by the executives interviewed. A number of them ran such courses in the twenties, but found it difficult to gauge their needs for new foremen closely. They realized then that they might train more candidates than could be given positions. This they knew would cause intense dis- satisfaction among the trainees. Another difficulty with such a formal course is the definite time schedule according to which it is operated. If a candidate is not advanced according to the schedule, he is likely to become dissatisfied. Preferably, the means for testing and training prospective supervisors should not thus arouse their expectation of stated promotions at definite dates. Furthermore, a formal preparatory course for prospective foremen tends to have a discouraging effect upon ambitious men who have not been appointed to the group. They naturally feel that they are not being considered for advancement so long as they remain outside. Perhaps the chief objection to a standardized preforemanship course, however, is that the program ordinarily is not focused sharply enough upon the specific preparation which a prospect for a given supervisory position should have. The existence of this type of course, moreover, has caused some executives to neglect individualized instruction. P 32 Imparting Information to Prospective Foremen At the beginning of this chapter, three objectives in the training of pros- pective foremen were mentioned: the first was to impart information and to promote an understanding of company policies and practices. This ob- jective can be sought in varying degrees of thoroughness. Thus, it may be sufficient that a candidate have a knowledge of the purpose and a super- ficial grasp of the procedures of the company in dealing with selected supervisory problems in the plant. This type of generalized instruction can be carried forward by means of discussions, the reading of monographs, and by inspection trips to selected departments. A number of the companies. visited were engaged in instruction of this nature. In one company, for example, a course was being offered to a small group of men who had been nominated by the several foremen as prospective supervisors. No one was appointed to the course unless there was a probability that he would be needed as a supervisor within eighteen months. The course includes material on plant management, industrial relations, cost control, sales policies, and the company's financial statements, and is given by department heads under the general supervision of a staff officer who correlates the work of the individual meetings. Collateral readings are required each week and examinations are held at intervals of six weeks. The examination grades are reported to the individuals concerned and to their supervisors. The meetings are held on company time, and members who fail to do satisfactory work are dropped. Such informative courses should be timed so that they probably will be completed before the members are selected for important supervisory responsibilities. Accordingly, if a considerable amount of material is to be presented within a few months, the sessions held each week should be increased in length or number. The length of a course can be minimized by limiting it to the informative material which necessarily should be given to a prospect before he is promoted to supervisory work. This suggestion reflects the views of executives who discussed their plans for expanding their supervisory forces rapidly. So far as imparting information is concerned, these executives stated that they would quickly organize conference courses for prospective supervisors. These courses might be held for several sessions a week and in them would be compressed a great deal of introductory information regarding company organization and operations. Much of this information could be obtained from the records of foreman-training courses which the companies have been operating < 33 for a number of years. The companies appreciate that some individuals in such a preparatory course might be promoted before they had completed the program, but in that event, they would continue in the course to its completion. Subject Matter Presented The subject matter of informative courses for prospective foremen may be grouped under a few major headings. Individual companies will find that some of these headings are important in their cases, and that other items can be dealt with quite briefly. The subjects commonly found in this sur- vey were as follows: 1. A description of major products of the company, their uses, quality, sales appeals, markets, and the competition being met. In case a company is subdivided according to lines of product, the individual candidate may be given information of this type with respect only to the major products of the division in which he may later serve as foreman. 2. Basic technical information which explains the processes in the can- didate's division and the relationships of those processes. A technical treatise referring to the total process of manufacture is used in one company manufacturing copper and brass products; a somewhat similar treatise is used in another company manufacturing steel wire products. 3. A survey of the company organization as a whole, followed by a detailed description of the functions of the staff departments which serve the candidate's division. 4. A survey of important personnel policies and the content of any collective agreement in effect. Some companies also introduce a brief treatment of labor legislation which governs them. 5. A review of the major records and reports which are used to main- tain departmental efficiency. These may include reports of production, defective work, idle time, and waste. 6. A brief explanation of the technique of methods analysis and im- provement, and a detailed explanation of the setting of production stand- ards. 7. An explanation of job evaluation, incentive plans, and performance rating plans which are used in the candidate's division. 8. A review of improvements in the products, processes, and organiza- tion of the company. Reference also is made to the progress made by 34 competitors. This material serves to emphasize the need for technical research and development. Such informative courses are valuable in that they present a basic pat- tern of knowledge to which the candidates can relate their specific observa- tions and experiences. The material, therefore, is presented according to a comprehensive and logical plan, and it is selected with a view primarily to the long-range needs of the members. These courses develop no skills, but they do tend to create attitudes which are favorable to managerial prac- tices, and they serve to give the trainees some appreciation of the difficul- ties and complexities of industrial management. Such informative courses should not be relied on, however, to bring about a thorough understanding of selected policies and practices on the part of prospective foremen.¹ Atla Instruction in Informative Courses The person who teaches an informative course to prospective foremen will take a more active part than he would if he were leading a discussion of the same topics by experienced foremen. Furthermore, the elementary material he would present in a preparatory course is accepted practice, and it is not to be formulated but learned by the members of the group. Con- sequently, explanations by the instructor are appropriate. By introducing cases, he can see whether the learners can apply accepted rules to specific typical situations. These cases will illustrate the meanings of policies or rules and provide bases for discussion which will reveal the intellectual and conversational qualities of the trainees. Examinations upon the sub- ject matter can also be used to test the degree to which the material is understood. Assignments to Promote Thorough Understanding In case a thorough understanding of important rules is needed by a prospective foreman, he should be given an opportunity to work for a while where he can observe and possibly participate in their application. In one company, for example, prospective foremen are selected within one year of the forecasted need for them. Subsequent to their selection, they are given assignments in six different staff departments: personnel, time study, planning, engineering, cost, and warehousing. The assignments vary in length from three to six weeks. The educational adviser and the managers 1 A number of the subjects suggested above are similar to those previously listed for a course to aid in the initial selection of candidates. The instruction given to prospective foremen on these subjects would be more thorough than any introductory presentation to a group of employees from which prospective foremen were to be selected. Too 35 of these staff departments have listed a series of tasks in each department which serve to acquaint the candidate with its fundamental operations. Weekly, each candidate is required to write a report on the purposes of the several procedures in which he has been engaged. These reports are read critically by the department head and the educational adviser, who thus can judge whether the prospective foreman is thoroughly acquainted with the services of each staff department available to him if he is ad- vanced to a foremanship. The numerous contacts which each prospective foreman makes in the course of this series of transfers affords a number of people an opportunity to judge his capacity for foremanship; and the experience itself greatly improves the ability of the candidate to master information, to digest it, and to express his knowledge. When many new supervisors are to be trained, the number of such transfers for any trainee would be kept to the minimum, and they would be carefully planned to maximize their benefits. Introductory Courses on a Large Scale The national emergency of 1940-41 created an unprecedented demand for new supervisors in a number of companies in the aircraft, munitions, and chemical industries. Although some of these companies normally had devoted one to two years to the training of prospective foremen, they found that the pressure of defense preparations would require the development of new supervisors within three to six months. One company, which faced this problem late in 1940, had to build a complete supervisory organization for a munitions plant then in construction. The training course given the prospective foremen in this case was planned by a committee consisting of the vice president of manufacturing, the general manager of the munitions plant, the personnel director, and a secretary. This committee divided the program into two phases: a technical course dealing with the processes to be carried on in the new plant, and a conference course concerned primarily with the management of employees. The secretary was made responsible for assembling instruction materials on the several topics selected for presen- tation. To facilitate instruction, the prospective foremen were grouped into small classes, each with a weekly schedule of three meetings on technical processes and three conferences on managerial procedures. This work was placed under the guidance of the division superintendents of the new plant so as to afford these officials an opportunity to form opinions on the intelligence and personality traits of the persons in training. At each 36 conference, however, a specialist in the subject under consideration initiated the discussion and answered questions. While the individual conferences nominally were limited to ninety-minute periods, in practice all meetings were continued until their aims were reached. Each conference was planned by the committee and the specialist con- cerned before he presented the material to the trainees. The purpose of this preparation was to arrange leading or challenging questions which would stimulate critical and constructive discussion. The company wished to correct the tendency of the specialists to lecture to the conference groups. The committee believed, rightly, that lectures could not give as clear an understanding of technical processes and managerial procedures as could active discussion on carefully selected questions. While the trainees were not engaged in conferences, they were working in the old plant of the company. There they operated metal-cutting and forming machinery similar to the types which later were installed in the new plant. 1 Conference Groups of Subforemen The distinguishing mark of a supervisors' "conference" is that all mem- bers are expected to contribute toward the solution of common problems. An informative course, on the other hand, is a logical presentation of basic information pertaining to particular phases of a company's activities. The information as presented may have no immediate application, whereas the discussions in supervisors' conferences usually are focused upon matters of immediate concern. Since the members of a conference group should have common interests and backgrounds, such a group should consist of persons from one large department or from several closely related departments.