WAJVERSITY OF MICHIGAN GENERAL LIBRARY ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN TO WILLIAM ROSCOE, ESQ. PRESIDENT, AND TO THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE LIVERPOOL SOCIETY FOR THE MITIGATION AND GRADUAL ABOLITION OF SLAVERY, THE FOLLOWING LETTER, PRESENTED TO THEM, AND PUBLISHED AT THEIR REQUEST, IS MOST RESPECTFULLY # INSCRIBED. $ SIR, " LETTER, &c. IT is with much concern that I observe, in your excellent and popular work on Political Economy, the sentiments you express on the subject of the comparative expense of free and slave labour. Accustomed to respect you highly, as an enlightened advocate of liberal principles, and to admire the philanthropic spirit which pervades your writings, I cannot but regret deeply, that opinions so much calculated to perpetuate slavery should have the sanction of your authority; and that, while you denounce the slave- system as unjustifiable, you admit that in a pecuniary point of view it may be the most profitable. As this subject is of peculiar importance at the present moment, when efforts are making, both in this country and in France, to effect the gradual abolition of slavery in the Colonies, I will not apologize for addressing you. The same regard to truth and candour, which secured your reluctant assent to an opinion little in unison, I am sure, with your feelings, will lead you to examine with impartiality any facts or arguments which I may adduce in my attempt to controvert it. Many of them, I am aware, must be familiar to you, but possibly even these may appear in a new light, and derive some additional force from their con- B • 2 nection with others which have not fallen under your observation. The expense of slave-labour resolves itself into the annual sum which, in the average term of the productive years of a slave's life, will liquidate the cost of purchase or rearing, and support in old age, if he attain it, with interest, and the sum annually expended in his maintenance. If we omit the case of purchased slaves, and suppose them to be bred on the estate, (and as breeding is now admitted to be, under ordinary circumstances, the cheapest mode of supply, your argument will gain by the supposition,) the expense of free labour will resolve itself into precisely the same elements, since the wages paid to free labourers of every kind, must be such as to enable them, one with another, to bring up a family, and continue their race. Now it is observed by Adam Smith, "The wear and "tear of a free servant is equally at the expense of his 66 master, and it generally costs him much less than that of 66 a slave. The fund destined for replacing and repairing, "if I may say so, the wear and tear of a slave, is commonly "managed by a negligent master, or careless overseer "That destined for performing the same office with regard "to the free man, is managed by the free man himself. The "disorders which generally prevail in the economy of the "rich, naturally introduce themselves into the management "of the former; the strict frugality and parsimonious "attention of the poor, as naturally establish themselves in "that of the latter." The Russian political economist, Storch, who had carefully examined the system of slavery in that extensive Empire, makes the same remark, almost in the same words. Hume expresses a similar opinion in decided terms; and I have now before me a statement from one of the slave districts in the United States, in which it is estimated that, taking the purchase-money or the expense E of rearing a slave, with the cost of his maintenance, at their actual rates, and allowing fifteen years of health and strength, during which to liquidate the first cost, his labour will be at least 25 per cent dearer than that of the free labourer in the neighbouring districts. It is observed by a planter, in a letter published by the Hon. Joshua Steele, a member of the council in Barbadoes, under the signature of Philo Xylon, "The truth is, that although we plant much more ground than should be “sufficient to produce provisions to feed our labouring "slaves, yet the negroes, feeling that they have no direct property in these crops, and that we must buy more to "supply them if those crops fall short, the cultivation is negligently performed by them, and the produce is "afterwards stolen by the negro watchmen or their con- "federates, so that we seldom reap a third part of what "should be the natural and probable produce. But if we "could depend on their diligence and economy, in cul- tivating rented tenements and carefully storing their crops, they might undoubtedly be maintained better than “they are, and at a much smaller expense than it costs us "at present; not only by our wasting three times as much "land as might be necessary for that purpose, but also by our cultivating it with a reluctant gang to our loss." From inquiries made with reference to this subject, it appears that the average weekly expense in the Liverpool Workhouse, for provisions, including ale, wine, spirits, tea, sugar, butter, &c. given to the sick, is 2s 64d per head, exclusive of rent; while the average weekly expenditure of seven families, taken from among the labourers of a respectable commercial house, is only 1s 5½d per head, exclusive of rent. (C 66 66 << 66 3 66 mat From the preceding particulars, it appears highly probable, that the cost of rearing and maintaining a slave, 1 would render his labour, under ordinary circumstances, at least as expensive as that of the free labourer. Let us next examine which is the most productive. And here I shall again avail myself of the observations of Storch, the Russian economist: The slave, work- "ing always for another, and never for himself, being "limited to a bare subsistence, and seeing no prospect "of improving his condition, loses all stimulus to exer- ❝tion, he becomes a machine, often very obstinate and very difficult to manage. A man who is not rewarded "in proportion to the labour he performs, works as little "as he can; this is an acknowledged truth, which the experience of every day confirms. Let a free labourer "work by the day, he will be indolent; pay him by the 66 piece, he will often work to excess, and ruin his health. "If this observation is just in the case of the free labourer, "it must be still more so in that of the slave." 66 66 “Whilst the ancient Romans cultivated their lands them- "selves, Italy was renowned for fertility and abundance, but "agriculture declined when abandoned to slaves. Then, the “ land, instead of being brought under the plough, was trans- “formed into meadows, and the inhabitants of this fine "country became dependent for their subsistence on pro- ❝vinces situated beyond the sea. The small proprietors and "farmers disappeared, and the same country which had "formerly presented the smiling aspect of a crowd of "villages, peopled with free men in easy circumstances, "became a vast solitude, in which were scattered here and "there, some magnificent palaces, which formed the most "6 striking contrast with those miserable cabins and subter- "ranean dens in which the slaves were shut up. These "facts, related by the Roman historians, are attested and What was asks Pliny, "explained by Pliny, Columella, and Varro. "the cause of these abundant harvests?' • @ 5 It is, speaking of the early periods of the republic. "that at that time, men of consular dignity devoted them- "selves to the cultivation of their fields, which are now "abandoned to wretches loaded with irons, and bearing on "their forehead the brand of their degraded condition.' "The superiority of free over slave labourers, is even acknowledged by the masters, when they have sufficient intelligence to judge of the difference, and sufficient "honesty to avow their sentiments. Recollect on this "subject the passage of Columella, which I have already 66 quoted, and in which he depicts the negligence and perverseness of slave labourers; in the same chapter, "he advances as a fundamental principle, that whatever "be the nature of the cultivation, the labour of the free "cultivator is always to be perferred to that of the slave. "Pliny is of the same opinion." “Observe, that this testimony in favour of free labour, is given by Romans, who were at once proprietors of slaves “ and the most eminent writers on agriculture of their time.” “In manufactures, the superiority of the free labourer over "the slave is still more obvious than in agriculture. The "more manufactures extend in Russia, the more people begin to feel the truth of this remark. In 1805, M. "Panteleyef, a manufacturer in the district of Moscow, gave liberty to all his workmen who were slaves, the "number of whom amounted to 84. "M. Milioutin did the same.” The same year, 66 66 66 66 CC 66 66 Brougham, in his Colonial Policy, fully concurs in these sentiments: "It requires very little argument to prove, "that the quantity of work which may be obtained from a “labourer or drudge, is liable to be affected as much by "the injurious treatment he receives, as by the idleness. "in which he may be permitted to indulge. When this "drudge is a slave, no motive but fear can operate on his A เ 66 diligence and attention. A constant inspection is, therefore, absolutely necessary, and a perpetual terror of the lash "the only prevention of indolence; but there are certain "bounds perscribed, even to the power of the lash; it may "force the unhappy victim to move, because the line of "distinction between motion and rest, action and repose, is "definite; but no punishment can compel the labourer to "strenuous exertions, because there is no measure or "standard of activity. A state of despair, and not of industry, is the never-failing consequence of severe chas- "tisement; and the constant repetition of the torture only "serves to blunt the sensibility of the nerves, and disarm 56 punishment of its terrors. The body is injured, and the "mind becomes as little willing as the limbs are able to "exert.” 66 (6 6 Hume remarks, "I shall add, from the experience of our planters, that slavery is as little advantageous to the "master as to the man. The fear of punishment will "never draw so much labour from a slave, as the dread of "being turned off, and not getting another service, will “give a free man. << Burke observes, in his treatise on European Settlements, "I am the more convinced of the necessity of these indul- CC gences, as slaves certainly cannot go through so much "work as free men. The mind goes a great way in every "thing, and when a man knows that his labour is for him- << self, and that the more he labours, the more he is "to acquire; this consciousness carries him through, and "supports him beneath fatigues, under which he would "otherwise have sunk." "That the proprietors of West India estates," observes Dr. Beattie, “would be in any respect materially injured 66 by employing free servants (if these could be had) in their “several manufactures, is highly improbable, and has, 7 “indeed, been absolutely denied by those who were well "informed on this subject. A clergyman of Virginia "assured me, that a white man does double the work of a "slave; which will not seem wonderful, if we consider that "the former works for himself, and the latter for another; "that by the law, one is protected, the other oppressed; "and that in the articles of food and clothing, relaxation "and rest, the free man has innumerable advantages. It <6 may, therefore, be presumed, that if all who serve in the "Colonies were free, the same work would be performed "by half the number, which is now performed by the "whole. The very soil becomes more fertile under the ❝hands of free men, so says an intelligent French author, 66 C (Le Poivre,) who, after observing that the products of "Cochin China are the same in kind with those of the West "Indies, but of better quality, and in greater abundance, gives for a reason, that the former are cultivated by "free men, and the latter by slaves;' and therefore argues, "that the negroes beyond the Atlantic ought to be made "free. The earth,' says he, which multiplies her pro- "ductions with profusion under the hands of a free-born "labourer, seems to shrink into barrenness under the sweat “of the slave.”” 6 <6 < "It is an ill-grounded opinion," says Franklin, in his "Essay on the Peopling of Countries, "that by the labour "of slaves America may possibly vie in cheapness of manu- "tures with Great Britain. The labour of slaves can never "be so cheap here, as the labour of working men is in "Great Britain. Any one may compute it. Reckon, "then, the interest of the first purchase of a slave, the in- (C surance or risk on his life, his clothing and diet, expenses “in his sickness and loss of time, loss by his neglect of "business, (neglect which is natural to the man who is not "to be benefited by his own care or diligence,) expense of ን 8 "a driver to keep him at work, and his pilfering from time "to time, (almost every slave being, from the nature of 66 slavery, a thief,) and compare the whole amount with the wages of a manufacturer of iron or wool, in England ; you will see that labour is much cheaper there, than it (6 ever can be by negroes here.” Koster, in his Travels in the Brazils, observes, "The “slave-trade is impolitic, on the broad principle that a man, "in a state of bondage, will not be so serviceable to "the community as one who acts for himself, and whose "whole exertions are directed to the advancement of his "own fortune; the creation of which, by regular means, "adds to the general prosperity of the society to which he "belongs. This undoubted and indisputable fact must be "still more strongly impressed on the mind of every one "who has been in the habit of seeing the manner in which "slaves perform their daily labour. This indifference, and "the extreme slowness of every movement, plainly point ❝out the trifling interest which they have in the advance- "ment of the work. I have watched two parties labouring “in the same field, one of free persons, the other of slaves, "which occasionally, though very seldom, occurs. The "former are singing, joking, and laughing, and are always "actively turning hand and foot; whilst the latter are "silent, and if they are viewed from a little distance, their "movements are scarcely to be perceived.' 99 Hall, adverting to the pernicious effects of slavery on the southern states of North America, observes, "Experience "shows, that the quantity of labour performed by slaves, is "much below that of an equal number of free cultivators.” 66 (6 An intelligent American gentleman, to whom queries on this subject were sent out, remarks, "I have in one of "my answers, exposed the effect of slave-cultivation on the "soil of our country, and on the value of real estate. I 9 99 "will here further observe, that independently of this, there ❝is no fact more certainly believed by every sound mind in "this country, than that slave labour is abstractedly in "itself, as it regards us, a great deal dearer than labour performed by free men; this is susceptible of clear proofs. It is observed by Mr. Ramsay, who had twenty years' experience in the West Indies, "I am firmly of opinion, "that a sugar plantation might be cultivated to more advantage, and at much less expense, by labourers who "were free men than by slaves." Dr. Dickson, who resided in Barbadoes as secretary to the late Hon. Edward Hay, the Governor of that island, observes, in a letter published in his valuable work, on the Mitigation of Slavery, "You "need not be informed, that it has been known for many "ages, by men of reflection, that the labour of slaves, “whether bought or bred, though apparently cheaper, is "really far dearer in general than that of free men." "The arguments which support this conclusion, as ap- plicable to modern Colonial slavery, were long ago assented "to and excmplified by men intimately acquainted with and “ interested in the subject." In another letter in the same work, he gives "a calculation made under the guidance of "M. Coulomb, an able mathematician and experienced "engineer, who for many years conducted extensive military "works both in France and the West Indies, and has published the result of his observations.” From this he infers, "that field slaves do only between a third and a "half of the work despatched by reluctant French “soldiers, and probably not more than a third of what "those very slaves would do if urged by their own interest, "instead of brute force, as Mr. Steele experienced." In speaking of Mr. Steele's experience in another place, he remarks, "He has ascertained as a fact, what was before "known to the learned as a theory, and to practical men as 66 $6 66 66 1 19 66 <% (C a paradox, That the paying of slaves for their labour; "does actually produce a very great profit to their owners." Again, this able and experienced writer observes, "The planters do not take the right way to make human beings put forth their strength. They apply main force where they should apply moral motives, and punishments alone "where rewards should be judiciously intermixed. And 'yet, strange to tell, those very men affirm, and affirm "truly, that a slave will do more work for himself in an "afternoon, than he can be made to do for his owner in a "whole day or more. Now what is the plain inference? "Mr. Steelė, though a stranger in the West Indies, saw it "at once, and resolved to turn it to account. He saw that "the negroes, like all other human beings, were to be "stimulated to permanent exertion only by a sense of their << own interests, in providing for their own wants and those "of their offspring. He therefore tried rewards, which "immediately roused the most indolent to exertion. His experiments ended in regular wages, which the industry "he had excited among his whole gang, enabled him to "pay. Here was a natural, efficient, and profitable reci- "procity of interests. His people became contented; his "mind was freed from that perpetual vexation, and that "load of anxiety, which are inseparable from the vulgar system, and in little better than four years, the annual "nett clearance of his property was more than tripled." “I must additionally refer," remarks the same intelligent writer in another place, " to an excellent pamphlet, entitled "Observations on Slavery, (published in 1788, and now out "of print,) by my late worthy friend Dr. James Anderson, "who shows that the labour of a West India slave costs "about thrice as much as it would cost if executed by a "free man. Taking another case, he demonstrates that the "labour of certain colliers in Scotland, who, till our own .. 66 46 10 66 1 → 11 66 times, were subjected to a mild kind of vassalage, regulated by law, was twice as dear as that of the free men who wrought other coal-mines in the the same country, and "thrice as dear as common day labour." 66 66 66 It is observed by Mr. Botham, "It may be desirable to "know that sugar, better and cheaper than in our Island, " is produced in the East Indies by free labourers. China, "Bengal, and Malabar produce quantities of sugar and "spirits, but the most considerable estates are near Batavia. "The proprietor is generally a rich Dutchman, who builds on it substantial works. He rents the estate off (of 300 or more acres) to a Chinese, who superintends it, and "re-lets it to free men in parcels of 50 or 60 acres, which "they plant at so much per pecul (1331b) of the sugar "produced. The superintendant collects people to take "off the crop. One set, with their carts and buffaloes, cut "the canes, carry them to the mill, and grind them; a "second set boils the sugar, and a third set clays and "baskets it for the market; all at so much per pecul. "Thus the renter knows what every pecul will cost "him. He has no unnecessary expense; for when the 66 · 66 crop is over, the last men go home; and for seven months "in the year, the cane-planters only remain, preparing the "next crop. By dividing the labour, it is cheaper and better done. After spending two years in the West "Indies, I returned to the East in 1776, and conducted "sugar-works in Bencoolen on similar principles with the "Dutch. Having experienced the difference of labourers "for profit and labourers from force, I can assert that the savings by the former are very considerable. By follow- ❝ing as nearly as possible the East India mode, and con- "solidating the distilleries, I do suppose our sugar Islands "might be better worked than they now are, by two-thirds, "or indeed one-half, of the present force. Let it be con- 66 12 "sidered how much labour is lost by overseeing the forced “labourer, which is saved when he works for his own profit. "I have stated, with the strictest veracity, the plain matter of fact, that sugar-estates can be worked cheaper by free 66 persons than slaves.” 66 Marsden, in his history of Sumatra," says Dr. Dickson, "highly commends Mr. Botham's management of "the sugar-works at Bencoolen by free labourers, and says "that the expenses, particularly of the slaves, frustrated many former attempts of the English to cultivate the sugar-cane profitably at that place." I think we might safely infer, from the preceding par- ticulars, that, under ordinary circumstances, the labour of free men is cheaper than that of slaves; but there are many other considerations which strongly confirm this conclusion. In a If slave labour were cheaper than free labour, we should naturally expect that, in a state where slavery was allowed, land, ceteris paribus, would be most valuable in the dis- tricts where that system prevailed; and that in two adjoin- ing states, in the one of which slavery was allowed, and in the other prohibited, land would be least valuable in the latter; but the contrary is notoriously the fact. late communication from America on this subject, from an intelligent observer, it is remarked: "The system of slave "cultivation, as practised in the United States of America, "has likewise a most destructive effect on the soil of our "country. The state of Maryland, though a slave state, "has comparatively but few slaves in the upper or western part of it; the land, in this upper district, is generally "more broken by hills and stones, and is not so fertile as "that on the southern and eastern parts. The latter has also "the advantage of being situated upon the navigable rivers "that flow into the Chesapeake Bay, and its produce can "be conveyed to market at one-third of the average expense << (6 (6 66 ▸ 13 4 * "of that from the upper parts of the state; yet, with all "these advantages of soil, situation, and climate, the land "within the slave district will not, upon a general average, "sell for half as much per acre as that in the upper dis ❝tricts, which is cultivated principally by free men. This “fact may be also further and more strikingly illustrated "by the comparative value of land within the states of 66 Virginia and Pennsylvania, the one lying on the south, " and the other on the north side of Maryland; the one a "slave, the other a free state. In Virginia, land of the same natural soil and local advantages, will not sell for "one-third as high a price as the same description of land "will command in Pennsylvania. This single, plain, "incontrovertible fact speaks volumes upon the relative "value of slave and free labour, and it is presumed renders any further illustration unnecessary." "( If slave labour were cheaper than free labour, we might fairly infer that, in a state in which slavery was allowed, free labour would be reduced by competition to a level with the labour of slaves, and not slave labour to a level with the labour of freemen; and that in two adjoining states, in the one of which slavery was allowed, and in the other prohibited, labour would be highest, ceteris paribus, in that in which slavery was proscribed. But experience proves the reverse.-Storch observes, that those who hire slaves in Russia, are obliged to pay more than they who hire free men, "Unless they live in a place where the com- "petition of free labourers reduces to a level the hire of "slaves and the wages of free labourers. The interior of 66 Russia, and the capitals of that empire, furnish proofs of "the truth of this observation. In the capital, the compe- "tition of free labourers is the greatest, and although the "wages of free labour are very high there, the hire of slaves “is, notwithstanding, less than in the interior." Thus it 66 2 14 appears, that in those parts of Russia, where free and slave labour are brought into competition, slave labour is only reduced to a level with free labour by sinking below the average rate which it maintains in the rest of the empire. When in Norfolk, Virginia, in the winter of 1820, I was told, that many slaves gave their masters two dollars, or nine shillings per week, for permission to work for them- selves, and retain the surplus. I also found, that the com- mon wages of slaves who are hired, were 20s 3d per week and their food, at the very time when flour was 4 dollars, or 18s, per barrel of 196lbs, and beef and mutton 3d to 4d per lb. Five days afterwards, in travelling through the rich agricultural districts of the free state of Pennsylvania, I found able-bodied white men willing to work for their food only. This, indeed, was in the winter months, and during a period of extraordinary pressure. I was told, however, that the average agricultural wages, in this free state, were 5 or 6 dollars per month, and food; while, in Norfolk, at the time I allude to, they were 18 dollars per month, and food. If it should be replied, that in the town of Norfolk, the price of slave labour was likely to be much higher than in the country, I would ask, why it is not so in the principal towns of Russia? If slave labour were cheaper than free labour, we should naturally expect to find it employed in the cultivation of those articles in which extended competition had reduced profits to the lowest point. On the contrary, however, we find that slave labour is gradually exterminated when brought into competition with free labour, except where legislative protection, or peculiarity of soil and climate, establish such a monopoly as to admit of an expensive system of management. The cultivation of indigo by slaves in Carolina, has been abandoned, and the price of cotton reduced one-half, since these articles have had to compete " Ai 15 ༥. ་ ལ་ 1 in the European markets with the productions of free labour; and notwithstanding a transportation of three times the distance, the West India planters declare that they shall be ruined, if sugar from the East Indies shall be admitted at the same duty as from the West. If slave labour were cheaper than free labour, we might reasonably infer, that in proportion as the circumstances of the cultivators rendered economy indispensable, either from the difficulty of obtaining slaves, or other causes, the peculiar features of slavery would be more firmly estab- lished, and that every approach to freedom would be more sedulously shunned in the system of culture. But it is found, by the experience of both ancient and modern times, that nothing has tended more to assimilate the condition of the slave to that of the free labourer, or actually to effect his emancipation, than the necessity imposed by circum- stances of adopting the most economical mode of cultivation. "In ancient times," says Brougham, "a great part of "the population of the most polished states, was the personal property of the rest. of the rest. These slaves were chiefly "captives taken directly in war, or purchased from other "warlike nations who had obtained them in this way. The "constant hostilities which at that time divided the people "of all countries, rendered this a very fruitful source "of supply. During the rise of Athens and Rome, accordingly, when many foreign nations were by rapid "steps conquered, and when others, still unsubdued, could "sell the persons of their weaker neighbours, there was 66 66 66 never any scarcity of men in the great slave-markets. "The cruelty of the treatment which those unhappy men experienced, was proportioned to the ease with which they "were procured; and we have already remarked how in- "tolerable their lot was, among the very people who called every foreigner a barbarian. As war became less common, 66 66 16 "and the arts of peace were more cultivated, this supply "of slaves, of course, decreased; and when the Roman "empire, tottering under its own weight, could think of "nothing less than new conquests, there was an end of importing slaves. Accordingly, with the progress of real "civilization, but still more with the diminution of wars " and conquests, was introduced a milder system of domes- "tic government, a greater humanity towards the slaves, "and a more careful attention to breeding, when the stock "could neither be kept up nor increased by other means. "The laws added their sanction to this salutary change, "which no laws could of themselves have wrought. The rights of slaves came to be recognized, the conduct of "the master to be watched, and the practice of emanci- pation to be encouraged. By degrees, the slaves were "incorporated with their masters, and formed part of the great free population, which was rather mixed with, than "subdued by, the Goths." "To the slavery of the ancients, succeeded the bondage "and villenage of their Gothic conquerors. But the differ- 66 ence between the two was marked and important. The "Greek and Roman slaves were imported; the Gothic "slaves were the peasantry of the country, and born on "the spot, unless during the wars which accompanied the "first inroads of the northern tribes. Accordingly, we "find no parallel between the rigour of the ancient and of "the modern slave system; and a foundation was laid in "this essential difference, for a much more rapid improve- "ment of the whole society, than took place in Greece or "Rome, notwithstanding the superior refinement of the “classic times. The slave first became attached to his “master, not as his personal property, but as a part of his stock, and astricted to the soil, to use the language of the "feudal ages. By degrees, the mutual interests of the lord << (6 << 66 (6 : 1 1 ▸▸ 17 "and his villeins, in the progress of national improvement, "operated that important change in the state of manners, "out of which the modern division of ranks, and the privileges of the lower orders, have arisen in the civilized quarters of the European community. First, the villein "obtained the use of the land to which he had been “annexed, and of the stock in which he had been com- "prehended, on condition that a certain proportion (gene- rally one-half) of the produce should belong to the lord "of the land, and proprietor of the stock. This great "change, one of the most signal of those events which have "laid the foundation of human improvement, by degrees "too slow for the observation of historians, was owing entirely to the master discovering how much his interest was connected with the comfort of his slaves, how neces- sary it was to treat well that race whose toils supported "the community in ease, and whose loss could not be "repaired; how much more profitable it was to divide with "the vassal the fruits of his free and strenuous exertions, "than to monopolize the scanty produce of his compulsory ❝ toil. As soon as the right of property, and the secure enjoyment of the fruits of labour were extended to the "vassals, the progress of improvement became constant and "visible. The proportion of the fruits paid to the lord was diminished according to an indefinite standard; the 66 66 (6 << 66 66 66 peasant having been permitted to acquire property, pro- "vided his own stock, and obtained the power of changing "his residence, and commuting the nature of his service. 66 By degrees, the rent came to be paid in money, according "to the number of competitors for a farm; and they who "could not farm land themselves, sold their labour to "others for a certain price or maintenance. Lastly, the legislature secured the lease of the farmer with the same "certainty that it secured the property of the landlord, C 66 66 18 " and recognized the one as well as the other for useful and "independent subjects." "A similar progress will most probably be the result of “that abolition, the supposition of which we are indulging, (the abolition of the slave-trade.) That this idea is not "chimerical, the consideration of a few facts, very little "known in the history of America, may convince us." "The peculiar circumstances in the situation of the Spanish and Portuguese colonies of South America, "have already partially operated some of those happy "effects which we may expect from the abolition of the "slave-trade. The high price of the negroes in the Spanish settlements, partly from absurd regulations of trade, "partly from the deficiency of the Spaniards in the prac- "tice of commerce and naval affairs, causes that want of "hands which would prevail in its full extent, were the "African trade stopt." "From, these circumstances, and partly, no doubt, from the peculiarly indolent character "of the colonists in those parts, there has arisen a much "better system of treatment than any other European "colonies can boast of." "Other views of interest have "conspired to confirm and extend this system of mildness "and equity towards the slaves; and the legislature has "not failed, by every prudent interference, to assist the "inferior race in the acquisition of rights and privileges." “Thus we meet with many very singular analogies be- "tween the history of the negroes in South America, and "that of the villeins or bondsmen of Europe, in the earlier "feudal times. All the gold and jewels in Brazil have, "for many years, been collected according to the same "plan that the feudal lords adopted for the purpose of quickening the industry of their vassals. The master "supplies the slaves daily with a certain quantity of pro- "visions and tools, and the slave is obliged to return a • 1046. 8076. 1216. 727 "Totals 12,509 15,081 "The chief increase is apparently in the class of natives, "while that of liberated Africans seems to be somewhat dimi- “nished; but this is, in part, occasioned by a difference of arrangement in the two returns. The large number of natives, "in the native villages of the Peninsula, amounting in the last "return to 1925, would have been divided, according to the "arrangement in the return of 1820-into natives, properly so "called; that is, as we conceive, the Aborigines of the Penin- "sula; and liberated Africans, living in villages, but not under "a superintendant. In the return of 1820, this distinction 66 was made; and then the whole number, amounting to 1468, "divided into 400 of the first class, and 1068 of the second "Both classes being called 'natives' in the last return, the "number of liberated Africans appears to have diminished; "while it has, in fact, greatly increased, independently of the " addition of 1590 since the date of the last return. We collect “from these data, that the number of liberated Africans, of all descriptions, in the colony, on the 1st of August, was upward “of ELEVEN THOUSAND. 51 Jan. 1, 1822. 128 601 722 85 3526 7969 1103 947 C "Still there is an increase of the class ranked as natives' "in the last return, to the amount of nearly 1000; of these, "about one-half are in Freetown, and the other half are chiefly 52 « résident in the settlements of the liberated Africans. This "augmentation is derived, we conceive, from the influx of the "people bordering on the colony; and is a gratifying indication "of the growth of mutual confidence between the colony and " its neighbours." IMPORTS. Invoice Amount. 94,799 14 5 "From Dec. 10, 1816, to Nov. 22, 1817 . .£75,716 6 01 Nov. 23, 1817, to Dec. 10, 1818.. Dec. 11, 1818, to Dec. 31, 1819 Jan. 1, 1820, to Dec. 31, 1820 Jan. 1, 1821, to Dec. 31, 1821 80,863 6 11 .. 66,725 9 4 105,060 15 10 . APPENDIX. " EXPORTS. "From Jan. 1, to Dec. 31, 1817..17.. 2990.. No. of Vessels employed in exporting. Tonnage. "From Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, Jan. 1, to Dec. 31, 1818. . 22 .. 3659.. 1517.. 278 Jan. 1, to Dec. 31, 1819. . 27 .. 5875 .. 2556 .. 1228 Jan. 1, to Dec. 31, 1821. . 26 . . 6805 .. 4736.. 42 Comparative Statement of Duties collected in the colony of Sierra Leone for the undermentioned periods. £3086 3 7 5124 1 3 4656 2 0 6153 5.6 6318 4 7 r Logs of Afri- Tons of can Timber Rice exported. exported. 1817 1818 Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 1819 Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 1820. Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 1821. J. REFFELL, Acting Collector and Naval Officer." At the moment I am writing, there are at least 3 vessels on the birth in this Port, for Sierra Leone. Extracts from Commodore Sir GEORGE COLLIER'S Second Annual Report upon the Settlements on the Coast of Africa, relative to the Colony of Sierra Leone. Indeed, the colony of Sierra Leone has been so differently "represented, so much has been urged against its rising pros- << perity, and proposals said to have been made for its abandon- "ment, that I consider myself (as an impartial person) the one "from whom opinions and remarks may be expected. The "climate of Sierra Leone is, like all other tropical climates, “divided into a sickly season, and one not positively so, for it may be too much to speak of Sierra Leone as ever absolutely "healthful." He then proceeds to speak of various topics, particularly connected with the nature of his survey. Alluding to the schools and churches, he says, "The manner in which "the public schools are here conducted, reflects the greatest "credit upon those concerned in, their prosperity, and the improvement made by the scholars, proves the aptitude of "the African, if moderate pains be taken to instruct him. I "have attended places of public worship in every quarter of “the globe, and I do most conscientiously declare, never did I "witness the ceremonies of religion more piously performed or "more devoutly attended to, than in Sierra Leone.” (C << tr In his report, dated 27th Dec. he observes, "The public buildings have not advanced so rapidly as I believe had been "expected; but it is, nevertheless, gratifying to observe, that "the roads in the neighbourhood of Freetown, and those in "the mountains, have been much improved, and that the bridges have been constructed of more durable materials than "heretofore. Upon the whole, Sierra Leone may be said to be improving, and if the encouragement hitherto shown, shall "be continued to the British merchant, no reason appears to cc С، APPENDIX. 53 (c