Qºl- 30/ 45 Y FIRST BIENNIAL REPORT OF THE n STATE BIOLOGIST OF TELE STATE OF OREGON TO THE . TWENTY-FIRST LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY 1901 A—SOME WINTER BIRDS OF WESTERN OREGON: B—SPAWNING HABITS OF THE RAZOR CLAM; C—PRESENT CONDITION OF EASTERN OYSTER EXPERIMENT AND THE NATIVE OYSTER INDUSTRY, JUNE 30, 1900; D—A CONTRIBUTION TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE FOOD FISHES OF THE OREGON COAST; E—SANITARY BIOLOGY, OR “WATER ANALYSIS ’’; F—WORK ON EASTERN OYSTERS, SUMMER OF 1900. SALEM, OREGON W. H. LEEDS, STATE PRINTER 1 9 0 1 FRED LOCKLEY RARE WESTERN B00KS 4227 S. E. Stark St. PORTLAND, ORE. FIRST BIENNIAL REPORT OF THIE STATE B I O LOGIST () R' TI-IE STATE OF OREGON TWENTY - FIRST LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY 1901 A—SOME WINTER BIRDS OF WESTERN OREGON : T3—SPAWNING HABITS OF THE RAZOR CLAM: C—PRESENT CONDITION OF EASTERN OYSTER EXPERIMENT AND THE NATIVE OYSTER INDUSTRY, JUNE 30, 1900; D—A CONTRIBUTION TO OUR PCNOWLEDGE OF THE FOOD FISHES OF THE OREGON COAST; E—SANITARY BIOLOGY, OR “WATER ANALYSIS ’’; F—-WORK ON EASTERN OYSTERs, SUMMER OF 1900. SALEM, OREGON W. H. LEEDS, STATE PRINTER 1 9 0 1 W. Q. &ºre a lºve O Q avrºs.'s. º \ tº - \ 5 - 3 (; 2, gº * } *: REPORT. TEXT OF BILL CREATING THE OFFICE OF STATE BIOLOGIST, AS PASSED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE IN 1898. Be it enacted: “That the office of State Biologist, without salary, is hereby created, and that His Excellency, the Governor of the State, is authorized to appoint a person properly qualified by Scientific attainments to serve in that capacity. The duties of such officer shall be Scientific investigation as regards the animal resources of the State of Oregon, and, as far as possible, the devel- opment of all such resources which have an economic value. He shall from time to time, or on demand, make a brief report of the progress of his work to the Governor of the State.” $ On February 11, 1899, the present incumbent was ap- pointed State Biologist by the Chief Executive, in conform- ance with the provisions of the above act. In this enactment the legislature doubtless intended to facilitate the introduction of eastern oysters to Oregon, as well as that of other east coast animals of value as food. That this has been the result is evinced by the interest taken in the work by the general government and by various cour- tesies extended by them to the State Biologist. - Quite apart from the question of the introduction of east- ern oysters or eastern lobsters, there is a large field in this state for practical work on the part of a biologist; the im- proving of the conditions of the native oyster industry, the study of the life history, food habits, spawning habits, etc., of clams, crawfish and other food-producing animals, and the bearing of such habits on legislation for their protection ; a listing of the birds and reptiles of the state ; a scientific study of the State’s food fishes of both salt and fresh water. Particu- larly, as having a direct bearing upon that most important factor of human happiness, namely health ; the examination and analysis of drinking water as furnished cities and towns. This branch of a biologist’s work is well called “Sanitary Biology,” for in no way is the health of the human family more seriously threatened, as a whole, than by ignorance as to the character of the water our children and friends use at 4 REPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST . our tables. Insidious because invisible to the naked eye, foes we do not dream of may abound in countless numbers in what appears to be a harmless glass of water. A micro- scopical examination reveals these dangers and leads to a study of the surroundings of the water supply. In this con- nection see appendix E of the present report. It is a rec- ognized fact of water analysis that a microscopical examina- tion, with a study of the environment (using the clues af- forded by the microscope), gives more conclusive results than a chemical examination. I need only refer to the re- ports of the biologists in Massachusetts, New York, Connecti- cut and elsewhere, as made in behalf of boards of health or in connection with the work of water commissioners, to evi- dence the practical value of their services in this connection. The biological laboratory of the State University at Eugene is well equipped with apparatus for water analysis, and the biologist intends to push this important work as much as possible without interfering with his regular work in the in- stitution. The work accomplished by the State Biologist during the last two years is described in the appendices of this report. An illustrated list of some of the Winter birds of Western Ore- gon has been published (appendix A ) with some notes on their habits and comparative abundance. This was intended particularly as a plea for the better protection of our birds. At the request of the Astoria Progressive Commercial As- sociation, razor clams sent from the coast were examined, microscopically, each month for a year to determine the time of spawning, that wise legislation might be enacted to pre- went the extinction of this food product. (Appendix B.) Experimentation with eastern Oysters has been continued (see appendix C ; also the account of last summer’s work, appendix F). In this work the most complete — indeed, the only record of water temperatures of Yaquina Bay—has been obtained, at different tides, covering a period from Jan- uary to August. The salinity and temperature at low and high tide during a part of the summer seasons of the waters of Yaquina, Coos, Tillamook and Netart bays has been also secured. Valuable information relative to the behavior of the eastern oyster in our waters has been gained in two sea- sons of study, and of particular value is the knowledge ac- quired of the breeding habits of our native oyster and the condition of the native oyster industry. (Page 12, appen- dix C.) REPORT OF STATE BIOILOGIST. Ö * In the work upon eastern oysters the United States Fish Commission has given the State Biologist most kindly co- operation, by the presentation of Oysters and in other ways, though they emphasize their opinion that the states should bear the cost of such experimentation within their borders. Appendix D gives a short list, the forerunner of more work in this direction, of some of the fishes used as food found on our coast and in Our bays. It Only aims at being a descrip- tive list by which and by means of the illustrations it is hoped those interested may identify species. The list is compiled from a collection presented the university by B. J. Brether- ton, of Newport, Oregon, and identified by the writer. Appendix E describes the principal method of water an- alysis, shows how wells may be contaminated, makes certain sanitary suggestions and illustrates organisms found in drink- ing water by use of the microscopes at the State University. This is a branch of science of great practical importance ; it is a growing science, and one in which biologists have done and will do much for the good of the human race. The biologist has served without any compensation ; in- deed, has been out of pocket in behalf of the work, but has done his best to make the office worthy of recognition. Other states have given a precedent ; why should not we in Oregon do all we can to foster the welfare of our commonwealth 2 I have been the object of some little good-natured badinage on the part of friends because my office has been “without sal- ary,” and as a rule the average American is too practical to realize how a scientist can work along a chosen line unless there “is something in it.” Until the time shall come when the state sees fit to recognize the Office as a salaried one, the present incumbent is willing to carry on the work without pay, but the members of the legislature will readily see that to maintain an office without furnishing some means for ac- tual expenses of the work would be farcical, hence the State Biologist will ask at the coming session for a small amount to cover such expenses during the next two years. That this is not for personal gain is evinced by the fact that the Secretary of State only honors items accompanied by vouchers showing actual expenditures. Respectfully, F. I. WASHIBURN. APPENDIX A. SOME WINTER BIRDS OF WESTERN OREGON. BY F. L. WASHBURN, A. M., UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, EUGENE. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, June 30, 1899. His Ea:cellency T. T. Geer, Salem, Oregon: DEAR SIR: It gives me pleasure to present this brief report of some of the birds found in Oregon west of the Cascade Mountains during a part or all of the winter season. There has been much interest shown in our birds by the citizens of the state, and, while the list is not complete, the species described here with are those about which there has been more or less in- quiry. Some of the birds listed are known to nest within the confines of the state; hence they are not exclusively winter visitants, although in the absence of our regular summer bird residents, their presence in winter is noticeable. - The growing interest in our feathered friends is an encouraging manifes- tation and argues that the birds will probably be better protected as the years go on. There is need of this, for, as the Season of Spring approaches each year, the small boy begins his cruel work with the slingshot and airgun. Most of the birds thus persecuted are our familiar birds, in the long run more or less beneficial to the horticulturist and farmer. Moreover, for every bird slain, a large number are wounded and escape to drag out a wretched existence until death relieves them. The thought of the unneces- sary suffering inflicted upon helpless animals by the thoughtless or cruel, prompts me to take this opportunity to appeal to citizens of our towns and cities, urging them to see that the laws which forbid the use of slingshot or gun in public places within the corporate limits and the laws which protect our birds be rigidly enforced. Neither can I neglect the opportunity to correct, as far as possible, an erroneous idea quite prevalent amongst our people to the effect that all hawks and all owls are injurious and should be slaughtered whenever pos- sible. The farmer’s boy feels it his bounden duty to destroy every hawk and every owl which comes within the reach of his gun, while Some so-called sportsmen go through our streets boldly flaunting the Great Horned Owl which they have shot, while the China Pheasants which have been poached are Snugly stored away in the pockets of their hunting coats. As a matter of fact, gophers, Squirrels, skunks, rabbits, meadow mice, Snakes, frogs, grasshoppers and other insects form a large part of the food of hawks and owls. The number of mice destroyed by this much-maligned class is enormous. To be sure, the larger hawks and Owls do prey upon poultry and game birds, but before condemning we should bear in mind that scientific examination of their stomachs reveals the fact that many birds which are at One season injurious, may, at another season, be very useful. Finally, permit me to call attention to erroneous statements regarding birds which find their way into print. A casual observer, seeing a bird he is unfamiliar with, jumps at the conclusion that it is an imported bird and sends a communication to that effect to a newspaper, whereas, were he a close observer of birds, he would have recognized the bird as a native. Again, the same observer reports seeing a strange bird, “brown, with a red head,” thus setting all bird lovers agog with excitement, which abates con- siderably when he picks out his bird from a museum collection and it is found that the crown is chestnut and that the bird is olive above, possibly with streaks of brown on a light ground below. I would therefore urge our citizens to treat with some suspicion statements regarding Our birds not coming from a recognized authority. In describing species in this report technical terms have been avoided. The scientific names given are those used by Elliot Coues in his “Rey to North American Birds.” Where a picture of the Oregon variety could not be secured, a cut of the type has been used. Our acknowledgments are due The Dana Estes Company, pub- lishers of this work, who, with the permission of Doctor Coues have pre- sented us with the electrotypes used in illustrating the following report. Respectfully, F. L. WASHIBURN, - State Biologist. SOME WINTER BIRDS OF WESTERN OREGON. THE VARIED THRUSH, OREGON ROBIN, ALASKA ROBIN. (Turdus maevius.) 3% º # 22 ºft ºf ºur ºr: 322.3%22.2% * ... --rºº • sº Zººlºº % .# %2-, 33%;";2:32 º Ž,7/3% ºilſ; 2.5- º, º º 22%rº, Zºº). sº %/14% ,” º %ft. fº/ jº º §|| %%); º * * 2% . . º. º º ſº. ...” ...'. * : ºr ... ', - !," i. %. , % Z23%º . % % º: ſº § º, º/º/7%/27 & . . . ; %2 ' ' ' 'º, ºh!" *% / %; % • 22 % Ž/. §% !) filº. §ſ ^3%//Z2%t.”, ºf gº." º/#! %; #|| %. \ º % --- º % % % : % 2// Common in late winter and early Spring. Familiar enough to render a description unnecessary. While its note is somewhat monotonous, a plain- tive whistle, the bird coming as it does at a season when there are but few bird attractions, is a welcome visitor with its dandy shirt front of orange- brown crossed with a black collar. Upper parts Slate colored. Remarkably tame when not molested. From seeing the bird in the timber during the Summer months, the writer is lead to believe that it nests here quite exten- sively. A nest and eggs are reported from Yamhill County. Length nine and one-half to ten inches. TEVENING GROSBEAR. (Hesperophoma vespertima.) This striking bird has of late years become a very regular win- ter visitant. Quite tame, and par- tial in the Spring to buds and green seeds of the maple. General color dull yellow with an olive shade. Yellow on the forehead, over eye, On rump and shoulders; wing and tail black, Some white on the form- er, and wings yellow beneath. Bill greenish-yellow. Length a b out seven inches. The above descrip- tion applies to the male; the female is much duller. Length from seven and one-half to eight and one-half inches. The writer has noted the occur- - § rence Of this bird in our towns as - late as June 10, its presence in the Shady: maples being betrayed by its sharp chirp, and three years ago, in SOME WINTER BIRDS OF WESTERN OREGON. 5 August, while traveling from Alsea Bay to the Willamette Valley, I found in the timber on Digger Mountain a pair of these birds in frayed plumage, their condition and the date indicating the possibility of their breeding here, although no nest was found. They come to us from the north, not, as is gen- erally supposed, to avoid the cold, but to find more abundant food than is Offered in their own home. AMERICAN RED CROSS—BILL. (Loafia, a mericana.) º: On February 3, 1899, the writer observed a small flock of these birds in Eugene. The members of this genus are readily recognized by the fact that their upper and lower mandibles cross, hence their name. This struc- tural peculiarity appears to have something to do with extracting Seeds from cones, cracking small nut fruits, etc. General color grayish or dusky; the males tinged with red; wings and tail blackish.Length about Six inches. CEDAR BIRD, CHERRY BIRD, WAXWING. (Ampelis cedrorum.) This beautiful bird is a common resident winter and summer, usually seen in Small flocks. General color a rich cinnamon on head and foreparts: crest of same color. this color shading to ash near tail: bill black, a jet black patch running over fore- head at base of bill, inclosing the eye; a well marked white line on lower jaw, and a narrow streak of same color over the black patch mentioned above. Lower eye- lid white. The cinnamon of breast shading into yellowish on belly and white on under tail coverts. Inner quills of wings tipped with red appendages, resembling beeswax, hence the name of “waxwing.” Tail feath- ers tipped with yellow, sometimes showing red-wax tips also, Length six and one- half inches. 6 som E wintER BIRDS OF WESTERN OREGON. BOEIEMIAN WAXWING. * (Ampelis garrulus.) Very much like the last and belonging to Same genus, but much larger, seven to eight inches. Not observed by the writer. Quoted in “Oregon Nat- uralist” as a “winter resident of Eastern Oregon, rare in Western Oregon.” PURPLE LINNET, PURPLE FINCH-‘‘CHERRY THIEF.” (Carpodacus purpurews.) A beautiful songster, but with a perni- cious habit of eating blossoms from cherry and other fruit trees, which has earned for it the hatred of all would-be raisers of fruit. Common, and nesting in Summer. General colors, grayish-brown, the male ... sº a’ having a crimson crown which color shades §§ gradually into brownish-red streaked with *...; § brown on back. Six inches long. jº It is hard to reconcile the facts that tº this wonderful songster, approaching in > -->= - : -- - º ź its ability the bobolink of the eastern $$. Vº # states, should also be such a terrible dep- #º; redator on fruit trees. We must not, in *#. § ºś condemning this bird, confound it with ºšš(ºš the Cedar Bird or Cherry Bird (Ampelis cedroºrwm) mentioned above, which has been found to be not only harmless, but, during the period of raising its young, at least, decidedly beneficial. 3. º: É - : WHITE–BROWN CROWN SPARIROW. (Zomotrichia intermedia.) One of our larger sparrows, about six and one- half to seven inches. Crown black, ellclosing a medium white stripe, and two lateral white stripes, all meeting on back of head. Dark ash with brown above, whitish on chin and belly: middle of back streaked with dark purple and ash. Common for the species during the year. It has rather a pleasing song, bearing a close resemblance to that of the White-Throated Spar- row, but not so elaborate. Coues vocalizes it by using the words, pee, dee, de de de. OREGON TOWHEE, GROUND ROBIN, CHEWINK. (Pipilo maculatus Oregonus.) Common throughout the year in shrubbery and brush. Called “Towhee” and “Chewink” from its peculiar note. Between seven and eight inches long. Male black, white below with chestnut sides, white markings on wings and tail, eyes red. Female brown where male has black. This is quite a “ground bird ” since it is found, commonly, scratching among the leaves. Its note and a habit it has of elevating its tail when hopping about are unmistakable characteristics, even were the colors lacking. SOME WINTER. BIRDS OF WESTERN OREGON. 7 RUBY-CROWNED EINGLET, (Regulus calendula.) An inconspicuous bird except to the student. Length about four inches. Greenish-olive, pale below; two white bars on wing; a concealed scarlet patch on crown. This patch confined to the male bird, glows like a living coal when the feathers of crown are raised. This gem of a bird, re- minding an easterner of the woods in winter, Snow-laden trees and flocks of Chickadees with which it associates in the east, is not at all uncommon here in winter. The writer knows of no record of its nesting here. - §ºssº. SAP-SUCRER. §§§º * - w § WSºº - - g §§ff A common pest Winter and summer. We should be careful in condemning him, not to include all woodpeckers, which, as a class, are very useful to the agriculturist. The rows of holes in our apple trees and maples are put there by this bird whose fond- ness for Sap is said to some- times lead it to strip bark from fruit trees. The pic- ture represents the eastern form—Sphyrapicus varius. ARCTIC OWL, SNOWY OWL. (Nycted scandiacca.) This large Owl is an occasional Winter visitant, not fleeing from the excessive cold of its northern home, for its thick plumage renders that Out of the question, but rather forced Southerly through lack of food in its accustomed haunts. About two feet long. White with blackish or brownish bars and spots. 8 SOME WINTER BIRDS OF WESTERN OREGON. SCREECH OWL. (Scops asio Remnicotti.) A common and useful resident, fond of mice, and hence led to frequent the neighborhood of dwellings. A carefully prepared work from the Depart- ment of Agriculture, as the result of the examination of two hundred and fifty-four stomachs of this species, has this to Say: “Thousands upon thou- sands of mice of different kinds thus fall victims to their industry.” Their economic relations therefore are of the greatest importance, particularly on account of the abundance of the species in many of the farming districts, and whoever destroys them through ignorance or malice should be severely criticised. GREAT BLUE HERON, CRANE. (Ardea, herodias.) A picturesque figure of our winter and Summer landscape, whether flying high in the air with long legs outstretched behind, or standing by the side of a quiet stream with sharp eyes and sharper beak ready for any luckless frog which may venture in its vicinity. Too common to need a special de- Scription. Length three and one-half feet. Nests in trees and bushes, Said to occasionally build on cliffs. Eggs greenish-blue. APPENDIX B. NOTES ON THE SPAWNING HABITs O'B' TI-IE RAZOR CLAM. NOTES ON THE SPAWNING HABITs OF THE RAZOR CLAM. Machaera patula – DIXON. Siliqua (patwila war.) Nuttallii – CONRAD. RECOMIMIEN DATIONS REGARDING PROTECTIVE MEASURES. BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY, UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, EUGENE, April 5, 1900. His Evcellency, T. T. Geer: DEAR SIR —This clam, which forms such an important article of diet on this northwest coast, needs no introduction to the people of Oregon. The genus is of wide distribution, being reported as occurring in India, China, Ochotsk, Sitka, Behring’s Sea, Newfoundland. It is feared here, that, as a result of its unlimited persecu- tion, both in summer and winter, it may eventually become rare, or even extinct. To guard against any possibility of the loss of this article of food, Mr. Johann Young, in the legislative assembly of 1898–1899, introduced House Bill No. 118, to provide for its protection. The bill reads as follows: A BILL For an Act providing for the protection of razor clams, and declaring an emergency. Be it enacted by the Legislative Assembly of the State of Oregon: Section 1. It shall be unlawful from and after the passage of this Act to dig, take, kill, injure, destroy, buy, sell, or offer for sale any shellfish com- monly known as the razor clam, between the first day of June and the 2 T.EPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST. fifteenth day of July, and the fifteenth day of October and the fifteenth day of December of each year; provided, however, that it shall not be considered unlawful for any person to dig razor claims for his or her own use. Section 2. If any person shall dig any shellfish, commonly known as: razor clams, whose length is less than two and one half inches, they shall immediately replace Said clam in the place from which it was dug, with the least possible injury to the claim. Section 3. Any person violating the provisions of this act shall be pun- ished by a fine of not less than twenty ($20) nor more than one hundred ($100) dollars, or imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not less than ten (10) days nor more than fifty (50) days. Inasmuch as there is urgent necessity for the protection to shellfish this act is intended to afford, it shall be in effect from and after its approval by the Governor. This bill passed the house and was reported favorably in the Senate by the Committee on Fishing Industries, but no further action was taken, and the bill, in consequence, failed to become a law. * . . In January, 1899, the Astoria Progressive Commercial Association, through Mr. H. G. Van Dusen, asked me if I would make an examination of clams, sent me from time to time, to determine the season of spawning. This I gladly agreed to do, and batches of from six to ten were sent me monthly from Astoria. These were given a careful micro- scopical examination and the results reported to Mr. Van Dusen. Before stating these results it will be well, that they may be the more readily understood, to give a brief and pop- ular description of the ANATO MY AND HAIBITS OF THE R.A.Z OR, CILAM . The name “Razor Clam,” by the way, is doubtless applied to it on account of its elongated and somewhat flattened shape. There are other species, however, in the same family, which are more razor-like in appearance than the one we are so familiar with as an article of diet. The shell of a large individual will measure about six and one-half inches, and, as every clam digger knows, they range from that size down, the average being, perhaps, five and one- half inches. From the anterior end (the end that is down when the clam is in the sand) protrudes the muscular “foot,’’ the tissues of which are capable of being distended to some extent with water, and the whole foot protruded several inches beyond edge of shell and drawn quickly and forcibly back. This so-called foot is really a part of the visceral mass or body of the clam REPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST. - 3 which contains the alimentary canal, liver, generative pro- ducts, etc. It is by means of this “foot” that the clam is enabled to get out of the reach of the clam digger, if the latter does not work quickly, for it stretches it down through the soft yielding sand as far as it will go, then the lower end is ex- panded, forming a temporary suction, and the retractor mus- cles of the foot are then contracted. Ordinarily, the effect of this would be to draw back the foot, but, the lower end of this organ being at this time expanded or curved, the body of the clam is drawn down to the improvised anchor, and the process is then repeated. This, with minor modifications, is the method of locomotion with most of the clams. At the end of the clam opposite the foot the “siphon,” wrongly called the “neck,” protrudes. This is a curious organ and has to do with the respiration and feeding of the creature. Two tubes traverse this siphon longitudinally, one opening into the space just above the gills, the other, the one nearer the ventral or free edge of the shell, opening into the general space between the valves of the shell. In this space, on each side of the visceral mass are two gills, four in all, which serve as organs of respiration ; and covering and pro- tecting both visceral mass and gills is a thin layer of tissue known as the ‘‘mantle.” This mantle lies next the nacreous inner layer of the shell which it has helped to form by its secretions. When the clam is in the sand and covered with water the siphon is stretched until its end is above the surface of the sand. Water is drawn in the lower opening and passes over and through the gills, the minute particles of food con- tained therein being carried to the mouth which is at the lower or anterior part of the animal; the water which has passed through the gills, flows back and out through the other tube, the exhalent tube of the siphon. The smooth epidermis covering the outer surface of the shell is of a brownish color and glistens as though it were warnished. There are evidently nerve endings at the distal end of the siphon which are sensi- tive to light and shadow, though this has not been definitely proven for this species. The sexes are distinct, as will be shown later. This is placed beyond all question, even if it had not been previously known, by these recent studies. Yet there are those in the State who claim that these animals are hermaphroditic. Familiarity with the use of the microscope and a knowledge of the anatomy of the creature would soon dispel this erroneous conception. 4 FEPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST . METHODS OF EXAMINATION AND RESULTS. In making the following examinations one valve of the clam was removed, the visceral mass opened above the ‘‘foot,’’ and some of the contents, after being spread on a glass slide, were examined under high and low powers of the microscope. When spawning, the ripe eggs, readily recognized with low power, look like Figure 1. - ſº g 459 @ gº ºe @: 6 99".) Wig. Under the high power, the actively moving sperm resemble Figure 2. % º % º % Fºg 2. RESULTS OF MICROSC()PICAL EXAMINATION. Jan. 15, 1899.--NO eggs nor sperm. Feb. 27, 1899.—A very few immature eggs No ripe sexual products. Mar. —, 1899.-Omitted lººmination. ut note that the February examination was - very late. Apr. 17, 1899.-Eight clams examined. No. 1, ripe sperm. No. 2, ripe sperm. No. 3, many mature eggs. No. 4, many mature eggs. No. 5, many mature eggs. No. 6, ripe sperm. No. 7, ripe sperm. No. 8, spoiled. May 13, 1899.-Ten clams examined. No. 1, full of ripe eggs. No. 2, full of ripe eggs. No. 3, full of ripe eggs. No. 5, full of ripe eggs. No. 7, full of ripe eggs. No. 4, full of ripe sperm. No. 6, full of ripe sperm. No. 8, full of ripe sperm. REPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST . 5 No. 9, full of ripe sperm. No. 10, full of ripe sperm. June 22, 1899.-Eight claims examined. No. 2, female which had spawned. No. 3, female which had spawned. No. 4, female which had spawned. No. 5, female which had spawned. No. 8, female which had spawned. No. 1, male which had spawned. No. 6, male which had spawned. No. 7, male which had spawned. I use the term “spawned” for both sexes. The specimens were all lank, had discharged their genitive products. Would be called “poor” by fishermen. The July examination was omitted because of press of work connected with oyster investigations. Aug. 23, 1890.-Ten claims examined. No. 1, male with sperm. No. 3, male with sperm. No. 5, male with sperm. No. 7, male with sperm. No. 8. male with sperm. No. 2, female with a few ripe eggs. No. 4, female with a few ripe eggs. No. 6, female with a few ripe eggs. No. 10, female with a few ripe eggs. No. 9, no results. These specimens all looked “lank” or poor, and the scarcity of eggs would make it appear that the spawning season was practically over. Sept. —, 1899.-Batch of clams examined. Very few with eggs or sperm. Oct. 13, 1899.-Out of a batch received on this date, very few were found with eggs; evi- dently Way past Spa Wning. Nov. and Dec. 1899.-NO results. From the results of the above examinations it is very evi- dent that the bulk of the spawning is during April and May, for it was during that time that I found them full of genera- tive products. June examination showed that they had finished spawning. A few eggs were found in August, it is true, but so few as to indicate that the spawning season was long over. In no case were ova and sperm found in the same individual ; in other words, the sexes are distinct. The de- velopment of this species has never been studied. While it is not of interest economically, it is of sufficient scientific im- portance to invite investigation on the part of a biologist. DEDUCTIONS AS TO PROTECTIVE MEASURES. It is evident from the above that should the razor clam need legal protection, the close season should be during April and May, or possibly from March 15 to June 15, thereby giving them every advantage of variation in seasons. 6 REPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST. A clam cannery, in its zeal to make a big season’s pack of minced clams, might use very small individuals, such as one seeking clams for his own need would discard. This contin- gency is provided for in Mr. Young's bill. * - As I understand, it is not intended to prevent seashore vis- itors from using clams during the summer months. This, in view of the long stretches of beach where clam digging is indulged in, would be a matter of extreme difficulty, if not an impossibility. If this treatise throws any light on the best time for a close season, Supposing such protection were necessary, I shall feel amply repaid for the expenditure of time and trouble it has caused. My thanks are due Mr. Van Dusen for very kind cooperation. Respectfully, F. L. WASHIBURN, State Biologist. APPENDIX C. PRESENT CONDITION EASTERN 0YSTER EXPERIMENT AND TEIE NATIVE OYSTER INDUSTRY. PRESENT CONDITION EASTERN OYSTER EXPERIMENT. BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY, UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, EUGENE, January 30, 1900. His Excellency, T. T. Geer, Salem, Oregon : I take pleasure in presenting to you here with a report on the status of the Eastern Oyster experiment, conditions of the native oyster industry, etc., and include several tables of densities and water temperatures taken within the last three years, and mailed to Washington, D. C., but not hitherto published here. I should like to emphasize at the very beginning of the re- port a few points which I regard as important, viz.: 1. I have beeem very careful in this work to state to the public as facts Only what we have actually found to be true, and have been eatremely conservative in statements which might lead our citizens to eaſpect immediate results. 2. We know that the introduced oyster flourishes, grows with extreme rapidity, and 800m becomes an excellent marketable product. 3. We know that they spawn here. 4. We have found a few young Oysters wºndoubtedly hatched in Yaquima Bay. Public opinion appears to have decided, with questionable propriety, that, as far as successful propagation is concerned, the experiment is a failure, and many of the Oystermen of Yaquina Bay, being intensely practical and not at all Scien- tific, share this view. Similar work on the Atlantic Coast (I refer to the experiments of John A. Ryder, see Report of Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries for 1885), demonstrating that oyster spat can be obtained in enormous amounts by resorting to pond culture, prove that we have no right to draw hasty conclu- Sions as regards our work here. 4 . REPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST. I have no hesitation in saying that, even should we be un- Successful in propagating the introduced species here, there is profit, much profit, for an individual, or a company, pro- vided ground could be secured for such purpose, in importing seed oysters from the east, planting them in our bays (they will grow in almost any of our bays), and selling to home trade a year or two years or more later. As is well known, an immense business of this kind is conducted at San Fran- cisco. Now, then, if pond culture of embryo oysters can be resorted to here (I have already alluded to a successful in- stance of its use in the east), how much more profit would there be in raising seed here than in purchasing it on the At- lantic Coast and paying freight rates to the Pacific. While I confidently believe that, in time, oystermen will find more or less eastern oysters in Yaquina Bay, which have had their origin, naturally, in the plant introduced by the United States Fish Commission, it may take many years before this result is attained, and my chief, in fact, my only reliance for immediate results, now rests upon pond culture in connec- tion with artificial fertilization. Artificial fertilization con- sists in mixing the ripe generative products from both sexes of Oyster in receptacles filled with salt water, and when the developing eggs have reached the swimming stage of the embryo, or later, turning them into the bay, or better, into ponds where proper temperature and saltness can be main- tained until they fix themselves as “spat,’’ this spat to be later deposited in the bay. With this idea of pond culture in mind, a cement pond was made last Summer in the tide land with the expectation of testing its efficiency next summer. Of all the bays of the Oregon Coast examined during the last three years, Yaquina Bay, though not an ideal place, ap- pears most suited for successful propagation of this delicious bivalve, although an abundance of oyster food was found everywhere, and, as stated above, this oyster will undoubtedly grow finely in almost any bay on our coast. - I here insert, seriatim, and very briefly, the conditions found by the writer to prevail in the localities studied, to- gether with a few tables of salinity and temperatures. The density of ocean water is 1.025. T.EPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST. *UĻĢĻEI1. I#TTO “I”]\\[ *)[0][:Z,UȚ5ņOIS UIQſ].ſt3nbOH || SZ * [[3p0I###-#*IWI "CH 08:ŻI!pſºggſ}}} | $3 ºpOOÙ # | 0ȚÇÃO ‘I0IÇÃO "I*IAI ‘’W gz:IIȚĂ ȘIŲAg9${{QH || $ā * pooŲ {IIgTO ‘T*IAI ‘V 08:0IÁ}{Q_{3{{!}} {$38 399 ſſſſſ!!J | 8ā ºpOOų și9TITO “I*IAI *V 00:0IÁ}}3{Kt3{{ x[OOUUIBIĻĻI, | SZ * poog S-IlmoŲ zALI800 [*IAI *V 08:6UȚqumo UUL ‘ų3m OIS uºſqu'en bo ET | $4 *AVOTIQI#ZOO ‘I*IAI ‘W OF:1,UȚ3 mot S trºņa en boȚEI Į SZ, ‘3ım V →"Oo ‘0.Iną‘KļļSUI@GI"Oo ‘9.Irmº)‘Á’)!SUI@GI� -*/· 0pȚI,-èſåđÈèÌì,UUIOļļOgI-ìſòđţi || $§§§0UCIȚI,Ķļļ[eoorȚ0ļ^3CI *[}].ſt3] ©AO UCI KIp0ņqumoputu ÞInOAA pri UCI 5 CIĘKUI BĆIULIO908 pUſe S19ųs0.ų „Iºn IIȚAŃ Kušoſ „10cICÍu Gù q ſuſ pūte º Kuq aqq Jo Kpoq aqq u į pĮoo ooq pune qȚes ooJL º X. V ºſ XIOO INVITTIINI, 'pº UIȚ8ļqo se AA KļļSUI 0p 00:3J·lus KĻULO Q'eqq AAO[[^3ųS OS LØ]\}AA *AOI ĐULIÐIȚXQIÇI830 'ISp0CĮ IQ4SKO ULO$38,SļJĮſt3ļ0 NI | 6Z *A^OrIÇI#ZO “I*JN ‘V gſ:Şpugotų „L'EQUI§§§SºļJ'\}] © NI | 67, · A\OrȚ |----GI†ZO “I*IAI ‘’W GI :$pºgaq (tºº UI{$38||SºļJ’B49 NI | 67, *C{q0 #8I###0’I"JW[ '&[ Gſ:9qqinou, „Itºu ‘Kegſ sºļīgļ9NĮ | Şz, ‘3 in V ●"Oo ‘0.Im]*K} ĮSUI@GI‘Oo ‘9.Inļ*K}ļSCIÐGI�•2*01^3 ºpțJ,-¿i.ULIOQQORI-¿ | §§§§0 ULIȚJ,Kļļ[30OrȚ}^3CI *SOÁIqUCIÐ 19ȚSKO UIGI04.st30 IOJ QIQ BIOAtēJUIlm ºss? UſqȚes Uſeøoo Jo læſe AA * XV 8I SJÁXIV JLGINI ALSE.A. B.A.Y. Same remarks apply here which describe conditions at Tillamook. . e Surface Tempera- Bottonn. Tempera- * Date. Locality. Time. Density. ture, OC. Density. ture, OC. Tide. July 13 Slough at Waldport, one and one-half miles from ge mouth of bay 1:30 P. M. 1.0245 14 | 1.024 (6 feet 14 | EIigh. 13 || Waldport dock, one and one-half miles from mouth 2:00 P. M. 1.024 13 |1.0245 (14 feet 13 | Ebb. 13 McKinney’s Slough, three miles from mouth------ 2:30 P. M. 1.022 18 1.022 (4 feet 18 || 13, hours ebb. 13 | Titus' Slough, four miles from mouth--------------- 3:00 P. M. 1.019 17 | 1.0235 (15feet) 14% 2 hours ebb. 13 || Nice’s Cannery 3:45 P. M. 1.0232 16; 1.0232 16 # ebb. COOS BAY. An ideal bottom for any oysters off Glasgow, and an abundance of food everywhere. But water too cold and too salt for eastern spawn except in extreme upper part of bay, near Marshfield, where favorable conditions, very favorable, Pºiº when I was there during the summer, but where an excess of fresh Water in the Winter, accompanied with mud, would be fatal to old and young Eastern Oysters. A possible danger from sewage in this vicinity must not be Overlooked. Good bottom was also found in the north channel of Coos River, in the vicinity of Willanoh Slough. From North Bend up (1897), the writer found large numbers of dead shells of the native oyster, such as we have at Yaquina Bay, and at Shoalwater Bay, Wash., and recently the government dredge has disclosed tons of these dead shells, COrrobo- rating the prevailing impression that this oyster (Ostres, lwrida) flourished here in great quantities, until killed by some catastrophe, a sudden and unusual deposit of mud, or possibly of ashes from the great fires of years ago. Before leaving Coos Bay the Writer urged upon the citizens of that section, the desirability of importing a quantity of these oysters from Yaquina, or Shoalwater Bay, and stocking Coos Bay. I take this opportunity to again advise Such a move, feeling Sure that it, Will result profitably. - i H (7. Surface Tempera- • BOttom Tempera- & Date. Locality. Density. ture, OC. Tide. Density. ture, OC. Tide. Depth. Aug. 10 Empire City 1.025; 17% à flood --------- 1.023% 21 feet. 10 || Marshfield 1.018 18 # ebb ----------- 1.018? 19 || 3 ebb ----------- 10 | Isthmus Slough 1.015 20 Low------------ 1.015 19 11 Marshfield 1.015 19 LOW------------ 1,015 20 | LOW------------ | 12 feet. ll One half mile below Marshfield--------- 1.015 I9 Flood ---------- 1.016 20 ------------------ ll Empire City - 1.022 16 | # flood --------- 13 feet. ll | South Slough 1.024 13} #91 ll Life Saving Station 1.024 15 3bb ------------ - 1.024 14 | Ebb ------------ - 11 Empire City 1.024 15 1 hour ebb - 11 Empire City 1.022 16 LOW------------ 1.022 15 | LOW------------ 11 | North Slough 1 020 18 || 1 hour flood --- 12 Empire City 1.022 15 ebb - 12 | Pony Slough 1.022 60 F OW - 12 | EIay’s Slough - 1.021 18 1.020 18 || 1 hour flood ---| 9 feet. 12 || Glasgow, at dock 1,020 19 2 bours flood-- 1.021 19 || 3 flood --------- | 10 feet. 12 | North IBend 1,022 I8 # flood 12 | Pony Slough - - 1.022 19 || 3 flood ---------| 2 feet. | WATER TEMPERATURES. The following Very complete list of Water temperatures, made by George King of Oyster City, Yaquina Bay, under the writer's direction, and extending from January 1, 1897, to August 3, 1897, gives one a very good idea of the condition of the water of Yaquina Bay in the neigh- borhood of the eastern Oyster plant. Low tide in this table, and high tide, do not mean neccessarily exactly the lowest tide or exactly the highest tide, but approximately low or approximately high, as the case may be. I believe this is the most complete record of the water tem- perature. Of Yaquina Bay in existence, and as such, commend it to your favorable attention. It may be well to note here that the best temperature for eastern oyster spawn is from 700 to 800 Fahrenheit, and the most favorable density or saltness is from 1,012 to 1.016. It must be added further that, a sudden change, either in the Saltness or in the temperature of the water is exceedingly hostile to eastern oyster SpaWn. In the density tables given above, unless otherwise noted, the temperature is in degrees Centigrade. To find the equivalent in Fahrenheit, multiply the figure given by 9, divide by 5 and add 32. Temperature, 9F. - . Date. Locality. Tide. Depth. | Time. jºr Remarks. Surface. | BOttom. 1897. Jan. 1 | Poole's Slough |High----------- 48 49 | 18 feet 43 | Clear. 2 Oyster City ll-- 48 50 | 12 feet 45 || Clear. 3 || Oysterville Flats 49 50 | 18 feet, 44 || Clear. 8 || Poole's Slough LOW------------ 49 49 9 feet, Rain. 8 || Channel, Oyster City LOW------------ 49 50 | 18 feet, 9 || Oysterville Flats 49 50 9 | Channel, Oyster City 49 50 15 | Poole's Slough 4S 49 || 14 feet, 15 | Channel 48 493 20 feet 19 | Poole's Slough High----------- 48 49 19 Oyster City High----------- 48 49 19 || Oysterville High----------- 48 49 25 | Oyster City 44 47 6 feet, 34 28 || Oysterville High----------- 49 50 | 20 feet, 47 30 Oysterville |High----------- 49 50 47 Feb. 5 Oysterville High 49% 50 20 feet 52 -- 13 Oysterville Low------------ 46 47 9 feet Estimated 6 feet. Of fresh Water. 14 || Oysterville e Beavy rains, water 3: fresh enough to - drink. 15 Oysterville Storm and rain, Water fresh. 16 || Oysterville 45 47 16 Poole's Slough 45 47 Fre S h et S a n d storms to March 4. | : Mar. 4 l Apr. 7 Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ | LOW------------ 50 50 44 PQole's Slough, Oysterville and Oyster City High----------- 49 50 Milligan’s Bend OW------------ 48 48 25 feet, 46 Qyster City, Qysterville and Poole's Slough Low------------ 48 49 | 12 feet, 47 Qyster City, Qysterville and Poole's Slough Low____________ 49 49 Oyster City, Oysterville and Poole's Slough Qyster City, Oysterville and Poole's Slough Low____________ 50 50 Oyster Ville and Oyster City__________-------- | LOW------------ 50 50 50 Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ | LOW------------ 52% 52 63 Oyster Ville, Poole's Slough and Oyster City Low____________ 54 53 Oyster Ville, Poole's Slough and Oyster City| Low____________ 55 55 | 12 feet, Oyster Ville, Poole's Slough and Oyster City Low____________ 56 56 Miñigan's Bená. LOW------------ 59 57 | 20 feet,__| 6:00 P. M. 54 Oyster City 60 41 feet, Oysterville, Poole's Slough and Oyster City 54% 54% Oysterville and Poole's Šiough 59 583 Oyster Ville and Oyster City—ll-______________ LOW------------ 59 59 - Oysterville 62 59 5:00, P. M. Docks at Yaquina, 55 52 Oyster City 62 60 Poole's Slough, mouth 60 59 Poole's Slough High----------- 58 57 10:00 A. M. Oysterville High----------- 59 57 Oyster City High----------- 58 57 Oyster City One-half ebb —- 63 59 7:00 A. M. Oysterville 62 Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ High----------- 60 59 Oyster Ville and Poole's Slough, mouth_____ Extreme low__ ($3 62 6:00 A. M. Milligan’s Bend 62 60 Qyster Ville, Poole's Slough and Oyster City Low------------ 64 64 Qyster Ville, Poole's Slough and Oyster City Low____________ 64 64 Qyster Ville, Poole's Slough and Oyster City Low____________ 64 64 Qyster Ville, Poole's Slough and Oyster City Low____________ 64 64 Oyster Ville, Poole's Slough and Oyster City Low____________ 62 61 Oyster Wille and Oyster City----------------- LOW------------ 62 60 POOle's Slough and Oysterville_-____________ High----------- 59 57 Qyster'Ville and Oyster City__________________ LOW------------ 63 61 3:00 P. M. Oyster City 63 61 - Qyster Ville, Poole's Slough and Oyster City High----------- 60 58 Oyster City, off dock OW------------ 63 Qyster City, off dock LOW------------ 63 Qyster City, off dock LOW------------ 64 Oyster City, off dock Extreme low-- 65 Oyster City, off dock igh----------- 62 61 Oyster City, off dock Extreme low-- 65 Oyster City, off dock igh----------- 62 61 Qyster Ville and Pool’s Slough.---------------- | Extreme low-- 65 65 Oyster City, off dock High----------- 62 61 Beavy rains. Strong east wind, heaviest rains Of SC3USO]]. Raw and cold. Bright and Warm. 5 : | WATER TEMPERATURES.–CONCLUDED. Date. 1897. June 5 } l Temperature, 9F. Locality. Tide. Depth. Time. fºr Remarks. Surface. Bottom. Oyster City, channel Bigh 62 61 Oyster City, off dock LOW------------ 6S Oysterville JExtreme low-- 6S 67 Poole's Slough Extreme low-- 69 7 Oysterville High----------- 62 61 Oysterville LOW------------ 65 . 64 Oyster ville High * 62 61 Oyster City Low------------ 65 64 Oyster City High----------- 62 61 A. M. Oyster City High----------- 59 57 P. M. Oyster City igh----------- 59 57 Oyster City One-half flood– 62 61 7:00 A. M. Rainy, Wind South- WGSt. Oyster City and Oysterville High----------- 63 61 11:00 A. M. Clºwind SOuth- WeSt. Oyster City, off dock LOW------------ 63 7:00 A. M. Oyster City, off dock JHigh 00 57 1:00 P. M. --> Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ Low------------ 65 64 Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------| High----------- 63 61 Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ Extreme low-- 65 64 Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ High----------- 62 61 Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ Extreme low-- 63 61 Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ High----------- 61 59 12:00 IM. 57 Oysterville, Oyster City and Poole's Slough Extreme low__ 64 63 Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ High----------- 59 57 54 Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ LOW------------ 64 63 Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ High----------- 58 57 Oysterville and Oyster City, channel-------- LOW------------ 65 64 Oysterville and Oyster City, channel-------- High----------- 60 59 Oysterville and Oyster City, channel-------- LOW------------ 63 62% Oysterville and Oyster City, channel________ High----------- 59 57 Oyster City |High----------- 60 59% Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ LOW------------ 65 64 Oysterville and Oyster City------------------ High----------- 60 60 Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ Low------------ 66 65 Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ High----------- 62 ſilk --> Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------| Low------------ 67 65% Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ High----------- 63 62; Oyster City OW------------ 66# 65% 26 Oyster City, off dock LOW------------ 66% 27 | Oysterville | One-half flood 65 27 Oyster City PQW------------ . 66 - - 28 Poole's Slough and Oyster Ville-------------- High----------- 63% 62 1:00 P. M. 64 29 Oysterville and Oyster City------------------ Low------------ 66 65 67 30 Oysterville, Oyster City and Poole's Slough LOW------------ 68 66 70 July 1 Oysterville LOW------------ 7 65 8:00 A.M. 63 1 Oysterville - High 64 63 - 3 Qysterville, Poole's Slough and Qyster City. LQW------------ 67 67 9:00 A. M. 61 3 Oysterville, Poole's Slough and Oyster City High----------- - 64 63 4:00 P. M. 66 4 || Oysterville and Oyster City PQW------------ - 67 67 10:00 A. M. 64 5 Oyster City - High 64% 63 4:30 P. M. 65 6 Oyster City * E[igh 64% 63 5:15 P. M. 65 7 : Oysterville LOW------------ 68 6S 10:30 A. M. 7 Oysterville High----------- 64; 63% S Oysterville High----------- - 69 68 9 || Oysterville High 66 64 8:30 A. M. 10 Oysterville Low------------ 68 11 Oyster City High----------- 65 64 12 Oyster City and Oyster Ville_----------------- LOW------------ 6S 6S 5:00 A. M. 13 Oyster City and Oysterville LOW 71 70 7:00 A. M. 14 Oyster City - LOW------------ 70 70 5:00 A. M. 53 14 Oyster City __| High 57 Cold Wave Of Water 14 Oyster City Low------------ 67 8:00 P. M. 15 Oyster Ville and Oyster City------------------ LOW------------ 70 7 16 Oysterville LOW------------ 69 69 7:00 A. M. 16 Oysterville High----------- 59 55 17 Oyster City LOW------------ 69. (3S S:00 A. M. 17 Oyster City Ebb------------ - 58 55 4:00 P. M. 18 Oyster City - LOW------------ 6S 68 9:00 A. M. 18 Oyster City High 57 5:00 P. M. 19 Oyster City LOW------------ 69 68% 10:00 P. M. 23 Oysterville High----------- 64 64 24 Oysterville - |High----------- 65 6:30 A. M. 5S 24 Oysterville High----------- 65 7:40 P. M. 25 Oyster City LOW------------ 6S 60 26 Oysterville 68 68 - 27 Oysterville and Oyster City 69 69 5:30 A. M. 49 28 Oyster City and Oysterville 6S 5:00 A. M. 45 30 Oysterville LOW 67 Aug. 1 || Oysterville LOW 67 8:00 A. M. 2 Oysterville Righ----------- 65 60 3 Oyster City LOW------------ - 68 3 Oyster City High----------- - 62 58 It will be seen from the above that the water temperature during the spawning season of 1887 was, as a rule, favorable, but note the Sud- den changes on July 14 and July 16. The protected thermometer used in obtaining the above temperatures was kinäſy loaned by the Portland office of the United States Weather Bureau. H 12 REPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST . SECOND CONSIGNMENT OF EASTERN. OYSTERS. Since the first consignment in 1896, the United States Fish Commissioner, George M. Bowers, has been liberal enough to present the state with ten barrels more of the variety known as Princess Bays, making in all thirty-two barrels of eastern oysters donated the state and planted in Yaquina Bay. Through the courtesy of President John J. Valentine, of the Wells, Fargo Company, this second consignment was brought from New York to Yaquina free of charge. The United States Government bore the expense of transporting the first con- signment. A telegram from Auburn, California, received at Eugene, October 30, advised the writer that the oysters would pass Sacramento that night, bringing them into Albany on the morning of November 1, where they were met and arrange- ments made with the courteous officials of the Corvallis and Eastern Railroad to have them unloaded at Oysterville. They were planted the next morning, some with the former plant, and some farther up the bay in deep water. This consign- ment left New York City on October 25; they were, there- fore, just eight days en route. Not a single dead oyster was found in the entire lot. The consignment weighed in the vicinity of two thousand five hundred pounds. * The Small sum ($300) appropriated by our last legislature for this work having been nearly exhausted, the United States Fish Commissioner, George M. Bowers, has practically consented to honor bills representing the expenses of next Summer’s work. This generosity on the part of the fish com- missioner is highly appreciated, for, otherwise, the work would be at a standstill during the coming summer, at which time it is now intended to make a thorough trial of the concrete pond constructed last season. CONI) ITIONS OF THE NATIVE OYSTER INDUSTRY. Yaquina Bay oystermen get at present $2.50 to $2.75 per Sack for native oysters, a San Francisco firm having con- tracted with most of the oystermen for this season’s output at the latter figure. The oysters on the native beds are so closely worked now that one-half a sack on a tide is consid- REPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST. 13 ered fair work, though one sack is sometimes obtained. In the past, the business has been much more profitable than at present. The oysters have dwindled in numbers and in size, owing to a too persistent tonging, together with a lack of fore- sight on the part of the Oystermen. If they could unite in a determination to forbid all tonging for two years or more on certain reserved portions of the natural beds, and persist for a number of years in such a plan, using care with the un- marketable seed, besides taking the best possible precautions along modern lines for catching “spat,” I believe the in- dustry could be restored to something like what it was ten years ago. But if the present methods continue, I will pre- dict the extinction of the industry before many years. There are at present less than twelve men oystering at Yaquina Bay, yet if all of that small number depended for their living on selling oysters, they would fare badly. Some of them turn their attention to Salmon fishing during a part of Au- gust, September, October and November. The oystermen who do not fish claim, and some of those who do fish ac- knowledge, that while drifting at low tide the weighted nets drag the bottom and in passing over the oyster beds disturb the Oysters at a time when the oyster spat is still young, del- icate and easily injured, besides rolling the adult oysters about at a time when they should be let alone, namely, the spawning period. From necessarily limited observations on my own part and from careful inquiry from reliable parties, I am inclined to think that this complaint is well founded. The Oystermen have been in the past united in the Yaquina Bay Oystermen’s Association, which, in 1868, drew up certain laws regulating oystering, which laws were afterwards made state laws by the legislature. In accordance with these laws, One is obliged to have resided twelve months in the state and six months in the county before he can tong oysters. Each Oysterman can obtain from the state for use as private bed two acres of tide land, and only two. Respectfully, F. L. WASHBURN, State Biologist. APPENDIX D . *=ºgº A CONTRIBUTION TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF TEII. F00I) FISHES OF THE OREGON COAST. A CONTRIBUTION TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE FOOD FISHES OF THE OREGON COAST. BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY, ! UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, July 15, 1900. \ His Excellency, T. T. Geer, Salem, Oregon : The following notes are based upon a collection of our coast fishes made by Bernard J. Bretherton, of Newport, Oregon, presented to the State University, and identified by the writer. The present collection is to be regarded as a nucleus for further aggregations, representing in time, it is hoped, all the species of fish in Oregon. To anyone who has made a study of ichthyology it is appar- ent that it would be out of place, and an extravagance to in- troduce here the long, technical analyses given in scientific treatises upon the subject, and it has seemed best to give, in each case, a brief popular description, which, with the aid of the illustration may help one to recognize the species. It will be noted that many of our more common fishes are not listed, the flounders for instance, and some others familiar to our citizens. In all probability the collector has left some of the more easily obtainable forms until later, with the thought that he can easily secure them at his convenience. Mr. Breth- erton has made careful notes on the colors of the fresh fish, and has, further, endeavored to list the stomach contents as throwing some light upon their food habits. His notes are given in quotation. Coll. No. means “collector’s number” referring to the number which came with the specimens. In the case of a few doubtful species my identification was either corroborated by the United States Fish Commission or 4 FOOD FISEIES OF THE OREGON COAST. the correct name given. The commission has also furnished us with six cuts at cost price. Acknowledgment of these courtesies is hereby tendered. - It may not be out of place to mention our experience in preserving fish in a way to best retain their colors. We have found that if the fresh specimens are placed in very weak for- mation (3% made from 40% stock solution) and after remain- ing for a week or so in this, changed to a fresh solution of the same strength and placed on exhibition most of the colors are wonderfully preserved, and the liquid does not yellow with age as does alcohol in which fish are preserved. In addition to this growing collection of Oregon fish, the State University has over fifty specimens from the Columbia River Basin presented a few years ago by the United States Fish Commission. Respectfully, & F. L. WASHBURN, State Biologist. a ſº Ñ Ñ % (2. Ø fº sº % º % e2 º: º3× Øº % 2. €º 2 º Fº 3% gº É § º %2% % 3: 3. # - 42.2% SMELT. 1.— CALIFORNIA FIG. % Öğ º g [. § & -º-º: § § sº §§ º § § ºs- Sºº § § § % § § º () w § }% § § § é § º 3. () (...) § º () º sº º (XY) (Öğ) (YY}} § º () . () () § § § § º § § () Q º §§ Ş () }} § () § § º () º § s § (XX) § º § § () § º §§ (X) (XX) º tºº § § Ç .—HIERRING, C. Mirabilis. 4) FI G. FOOD FISHES OF THE OREGON COAST. Ö CALIFORNIA SMELT. (Athentinopsis Califormicus—GIRARD.) About eighteen inches long, a “translucent green” with a somewhat sil- very or lead-colored lateral stripe; some yellow on gill covers. Eye small, body elongate. One specimen collected. Given by Jordan and Evermann as very abundant on coast of California from Cape Mendocino to San Diego; found in schools near shore, and an important food fish. See Fig. 1. CALIFORNIA TOMCOD. (Microgadus proximus—G.I.R.A.R.D. ) This little fish really needs no description. Just why it should be desig- nated Califon'ſvia Tomcod is a question, for it is in Summer one of our most abundant, though by no means the best, of our salt water food fishes. Very common from Monterey to Alaska. Two specimens: Collector’s Nos. 4 and 5. “August 10. Silvery white; pale brown on dorsal surface. Contents of stomach indefinable.’’ - * . CALIFORNIA HERRING. (Cluſpect pallasii—CUVIER and VALENCIENNES.) Bluish above; silvery on sides and below. From sixteen to eighteen inches long. Abundant from San Diego to Ramschatka. A well-known fish on our coast and fully as abundant here as in California. Two specimens collected, Nos. 6 and 7. “August 10. Stomachs empty.” Fig. 2 represents C. miyablis, in general appearance resembling the species under discussion. . CAT IFORNIA SARDINE. (Clupa/modom, caterwlews—GIRARD.) Another misnomer, for, under the name of “Herring,” this and the pre- ceding are at times exceedingly abundant in our bays, and very highly es- teemed as food fishes. In general appearance like the last, but larger, – about twelve inches. Found from Puget Sound to Magdalena Bay. Two Specimens, Nos. 8 and 9. ‘‘Norway Herring, a larger and plumper fish than the preceding.” See middle figure in Plate I: photographed from a speci- men preserved in formalin. 6 ROOD FISHES OF THE OREGON COAST. ALASPCA GREEN FISH. ( Hea:Ctgrammos Octogrammws.) * Called “sea trout” by our fishermen. Varies much in coloration, accord- ing to age, etc., and likely to be confused with H. Stelleri, the “Greenling.” Two specimens, 18 and 16. . No. 18. “Sea trout–September 7, 1899. Dorsal surface and sides light slate, blotched with pale green, each blotch surrounded by several dark umber spots; ventral Surface, lighter; pectoral fins spotted with pale mus- tard yellow. • No. 16. “Medicine fish. Ventral surface, brownish yellow with greenish tinge. Dorsal surface, burnt umber. Stomach contents, mussels.” ROCK TROUT, GREENLING, BOREGAT, BODIERA. ( Heavagrammvws, decagrammws—PALLAS.) Much like the last and liable to be confused with it. Sexes very unlike in color. The females are extremely variable in coloration. I quote from Jordan and Evermann to show the great variation in individuals and the con- sequent confusion among local fishermen: “Adults highly colored ; the males with large sky-blue spots; the females with smaller red or orange spots; young sometimes plain brown with dark humeral spots. Males clear brownish olive of varying shade, often tinged with bluish or coppery and vaguely blotched, often with Small blue Spots; head and anterior part or body with rather large sky-blue spots, each surrounded by a rusty ring, these smaller and more numerous on the top of the head ; lips with bluish spots, upper fins brown, mottled ; ventrals and anal dusky bluish ; pectorals dark, both rays and membranes crossed by sharply defined whitish reticula- tions, so that the fins appear to be profusely spotted with white. Females brownish, somewhat tinged with reddish, closely covered with round spots of a reddish-brown; these spots usually quite small and uniform over the whole body, back and sides; dorsal fin Spotted on the scaly part, the fins otherwise plain reddish or bluish ; the ventral usually dusky; pectorals light Orange, without markings. Other females------------------ have the ground color slaty blue, with round Orange spots considerably larger than usual and becoming vermiculations on the head; dorsal fin orange, clouded at base with blue; soft dorsal edged with bluish ; pectorals plain orange; belly white. These vary into the Ordinary type---------------- Length, eighteen inches. Abundant from Point Conception to Kodiak Island, Alaska, es- pecially about San Francisco. A common food fish. See Fig. 3, also upper figure in Plate I; photographed from a Specimen preserved in formalin. ،ģ§§ · {&{};}&S。ſae§§ -! §§§§§§§§§§§§ §§§§§§|- ≡§§ §§§ § ¿ ¿ §¶• §§§§ģ §§ §§§§§§§§). ¡¿ §§2) FIG. 8,--STEILI, ER'S ROCK TROUWT, II. atsper, to illustrate //. (lecatgººctºmu, t.s. ^3} ſaer, §§ ¶√∞ √≥± ¿ tae', e.e.。22a§§ º gaer,,t-' |×a:№ Zaeaeae«№. !! §§§§§ģ№ Ř$№Ę ŅŅR&&Ķat:(№ ŅQ§©®NŠŒ№ſ ș§\S)º.s:=≡:S• ± •§§§ § §§ ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÊÊËĒĖĘĘĢ I, I (; , 4. ILANT O'R SA NID EEL, LA . .-1 meric(aemus—T) EIN A Y. • FOOD FISHES OF THE OREGON COAST. 7 Is it any wonder that these individuals of the same Species receive differ- ent common names? I give collector’s description of Color and his notes in detail to illustrate the misconceptions arising from these Striking variations. Five specimens, Nos. 3, 11, 12, 13, 15. - - Nos. 11 and 12. March 24.—Sea trout. Fins, pale yellowish brown; ven- tral surface, white ; sides and dorsal Surface, Slate thickly spotted with color of fins. Stomach contents (No. 12), large crustacea. No. 3. “Kelp fish. Color, dark umber mottled with light green; ventral surface, pale yellow ; fins, slate gray. No. 13. “Kelp fish. March 24. Pale brown clouded with black on head; fore part of body blotched with peacock blue. Each blotch with several black dots; fins, black. * No. 15. “Medicine fish. T March 24, Dark brown on dorsal surface fad- ing into terra cotta, everywhere blotched with gray; folds under jaw bril- liant bluish green. LANT, LAUNCE, SAND EEL. (Ammodytes personatus—GIRARD.) It is not an unusual thing for Summer visitors at the Seashore to find that the receding tide has left the beach strewn with little cylindrical fish about four inches long, of a clear translucent green color with Silvery sides, a sharp snout, with underjaw projecting, and a forked tail. This is the Sand Launce, not only attractive from its coloration, from an aesthetic point of view, but also a most excellent pan fish. They burrow in the Sand to escape their numerous enemies, and are frequently found in this position where the tide has left them, their heads only showing above the surface. If the morning stroller on the beach is wise he will gather all of these he can, and with an admiring glance possibly at a school darting about in Some im- prisoning beach pool, he will hurry home and give directions for their cook- ing. Cleaning these little fish is soon over with. Hold one by the nape with thumb and forefinger of left hand; then with scissors, or with fingers of other hand, dexterously remove the head, and at the same time the at- tached entrails. Wash the fish, dry, flour, and fry in pan with about fifty of his fellows, and the next morning will find all the members of the family on the beach hunting for Launce. Abundant on Sandy shores of Atlantic and Pacific coasts. See Fig. 4. T3ROWN ROCK FISEI. (Sebastodes cºwriculatus—G.I.R.A.R.D.) r One specimen received. Collector's No. 2. —“August 2. Color, mottled, - orange, yellow, with reddish cast on dark umber ground. Ventral Surface lightest. Lower lip yellow. Stomach contents, fragments of fish.” Length, 8 FOOD FISHES OF THE OREGON COAST . ** seven inches. Given as very abundant from Cape Mendicino to Cerros Is- land. See lower figure Plate I; from a photograph of a specimen preserved in formalin. YELLOW-TAILED ROCK FISH. (Sebastodes flavidws—AYRES.) A strong, heavy fish, the so-called “Black Sea Bass” of our Oregon Coast. Olive green or blackish. Twenty-four inches long. Mouth large, strong; lower jaw projecting. Dorsal fin continuous, but indented; spines of fin slender. Two specimens. Collector’s Nos. 17 and 22. ‘‘Black Sea. Bass. Ventral surface, dirty white; dorsal black; stomach empty.” See Fig. 5. BLUE PERCH, STRIPED SURF FISH, SQUAW FISH. (Taemitoca latercºlis—AGASSIZ.) (Ditrema, latercºle—GUNTHER.) This species and its relative, Damalichthys argyrosomus, the White Perch or Porgee are almost too common on our shore to need description. They are both members of a viviparous family, the Embiotocoidae or Surf fishes. In the summer season when they are carrying their young their flesh is poor and tasteless, though they readily take the hook and Specimens all the way from one pound to six pounds are caught off the rocks, the tyro fisherman being sometimes astonished to see young fish, two inches long, Slipping from the parent and flopping on the rocks beside him, quite capable of Swimming if placed in water. This family is so interesting, that I quote from Jordan and Evermann as follows: ‘‘Viviparous. The young are hatched within the body, where they remain closely packed in a sack-like enlargement of the Oviduct analogous to the uterus until born. These foetal fishes bear at first little resemblance to the parent, being closely compressed and having the vertical fins exceedingly elevated. At birth they are from one and a half to two and a half inches in length and similar to the adult in appearance, but more compressed, and red in color. Since the announcement of their viviparous nature by Prof. Louis Aguisiz in 1853 and by Dr. William P. Gibbon in 1854 these fishes have been objects of special interest to Zoologists. Fishes of the Pacific Coast of North America, inhabiting bays and the Surf on Sandy beaches. One species (Hysterocampus braski) inhabits fresh water: three others (Dilhºema lemmincki, D,smittii, and Neoditrema rawsometti) are found in Japan. These species reach a length of from six to eighteen inches and are very abundant where found. * * * Most of them feed on Crus- tacea, but one genus (Abeoma) is partly or wholly herbivrous. Genera. 17: Species about 20.” - * The pavement-like teeth, above and below, in the back part of the mouth (pharyngeal teeth, used for crushing hard substances), are extremely inter- esting and well worth examination on the part of the fisherman interested FOOD FISFIES OF THE OREGON COAST. 9 in biological phenomena. One specimen, Collector’s No. 20. “Squaw fish. Head golden yellow, spotted irregularly with brilliant blue ; entire body striped longitudinally with alternate golden yellow and brilliant blue. A distinct black median Stripe from upper corner of gill opening to base of tail. Stomach contains small jelly fish.” See Fig. 6. SCULPIN, BULL HEAD. ( Enophrys bison—GIRAR.D.) A type of a large and variable family known as Cottidae, the Sculpins. There are about sixty genera in this group and over two hundred species, a few of which are found in fresh water. Of the salt water forms most of the species are shore fish, but some descend to great depths. No extended de- Scription of the Sculpin is necessary, for any fisherman catching one for the first time, would feel instinctively, as he landed his bony prize (?) and sur- veyed it bristling with horns, its head flat and wide, its mouth gaping, and its generally repulsive appearance, that he had caught “a sculpin.” The species under discussion is very common from San Francisco to Sitka. Not used for food. One specimen received, Collector's No. 1. “August 1, 1898, Bull Head, or Sculpin. Color dark umber, irregularly mottled with light lemon yellow. Stomach packed full of young kelp weed.” SAND FISH. (Trichodom, trichodon—TILESIUS.) One specimen sent by Mr. Toner, Yaquina City, the only one observed by the writer. A striking fish, about eight inches long, of a general silvery color; brownish above; a brown streak on side, broken toward the head. Peculiar mottlings between head and first dorsal fin, and irregular brown markings on back at base of fins. Dark line below or at lower edge of eye. Habitat, North Pacific, on Sandy shores, from Monterey to Behring Sea, burying itself in Sand. Comparison of the straight line, shown with some figures, with the picture of the fish, enable one to estimate the length of the species in inches. PLATE. I. APPENDIX E. SANITARY BIOLOGY ANALYSIS () F I)RINKING WATER, TEPORT OF STATE BIOILOGIST. "luº slu|| Jº ºsn º 111 101 (1,1,1) wº N Jo suº uopss! tu tuo, ) jºu pon bov. Jo paeoſi ºtl | Jo (111 H (.I. (w jo v soluno, ºu i ol pº 10 lopuſ ºu tº : A\, Aua, w luud tu! Wºul ſuo ºp om ljøl ºut? Aot 11 JI „tolu w ºtų stupis quaeptiºn lae u v 'uºlu; w ot|| ol uopo puu ºlsus, quaestrøm i un ºtt ſolº-asoorlo jo opustu lau , q !! w ºsuusputaelo osºu i uwolq suzu put I w otu oitouw 'avious atlı ſırau ºu ſovitasou º uſ touw w atıl titoj arī Itº ainului punº souodºs ºuſ votuau ſo pou lotu atlı sawous tiolaetusmių siuj. **{��*:\\ſlo 40 Uttad p.tbu. JO 400J 00.1ųų ‘CI puu ºle.Au.lä joļ00] !!!9!O “100J a troj 'putºs Jo ‘º ‘dººp 100] Utō] lubo I, puu oſuus Jo pĐq u sų V ſºttoſs øų, tio №šnoqUCIOJŲ Kt3AAtº 100! Kq„IȚUȚ) (KAĻId ñu ſpm ſºuſ) sºstno q]uo suo ſut? A punº (t.i.lºq sſ £) punº’‘Āe Amº 'hºàĮ jų$ța și noč, ºlfa w atqqJI ‘5UIȚII0Ap sų GT ºlmā g 9A oqė ėtį į ſu I ( •�o..e.Qº·ſºv{)º|- ſººſ:$49’‘q’, 3,2×9<ąſø9×Q�• “_9 AO-% 2o 0,82?**, ###$£§!??£&ț¢ £ €###39, o oſ 239 r.�?, 14, º ¿É$ $3&###ģ%§§§§ •••40>'); ĢĂººſºlºž%????> ;Qaegº£;ğ.łą, łooº ø ± ø Œ %% %:65%ºº..ººº.JŪN.), -Að. Lºº• Lº …? « ſºº º&& ſ.ſ.ºV33 ſo_0 p oºaeg %%%%%%%%%% ·� -->•%• -3:º » 4** ... • w:vº ·•� |- * ,*, , pº*«...;!• • ►Jºſ.,y, ſ. zº ſer„, , , *a= * … ( ººººº,...)"?ſ.º.º.º.º, ,,,( )º (§ 2- 4 f, º. º.), „,“* ', , , -?* *):!!!!! ººº ** ** º * * · * *. — 4. * -->» * BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY, UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, ; ; - December 10, 1900. ) To His Excellency, T. T. Geer— . . . DEAR SIR : Probably there is no greater menace to public health than our ignorance of the character of the water which we drink. If it be clear and tasteless, we remark upon its excellence; even if it is discolored or odoriferous from time to time we endure it and make no special effort to examine it scientifically or the environments of its source — well, or res- ervoir, or river, or brook, as the case may be. Many a land- owner in Oregon has his barn and Outhouses on a slope be- low his dwelling house and about forty feet, more or less, from the latter. At a greater or less distance from his back door we find a dug well, and he imagines, Overlooking the regret- table fact that slops are often thrown out of said door, that, the barn being on a level below his well, there can be no drain- age whatever from his various outhouses into the source of his water supply. He does not realize that while Mother Earth Smiles at him on the surface, she may be playing him an ugly trick below the surface. For, notwithstanding the aforesaid slope, we may find, and frequently do find, the strata arranged in such a way that there is drainage from the barn toward the house. (See Fig. 1). - It is evident that, under these conditions, there will be seepage from the barn toward the well, and the water of the latter will be contaminated. See also, in this connection, Plate II at end of this report. Water supplies of towns and cities are defiled in various ways; and, in the absence of any scientific examination of said water, the danger is not manifest until an epidemic arises in consequence. Many eastern states and eastern cities, realizing the importance of surveillance over the public health, have created boards of health, or appointed officers whose duty it is, among other things bearing on public hygiene, to make careful microscopical examinations for the purpose of determining the potability of water supplies. This work, which well might be called “Sanitary Biology,” has grown to such proportions that books are written upon the subject, and it has become a science by itself. The color, Odor, nature and amount of sediment, number of organisms in a known amount of sampie, and whether they are plant or animal, amount and character of amorphous matter, the 4 A N A I, YSIS OF D RIN RING WATER, . number and nature of the bacteria contained in sample under examination, and whether they are germs of disease—all these factors figure in a biological examination of drinking water. The microscope, then, is the chief instrument in determining the quality of a water supply. By its use we learn whether there are indications of sewage contamination ; it explains the cause of certain Odors in water, and whether they arise from a dangerous cause or not ; it shows us the minute eggs of internal parasites, invisible without high magnification, which, if taken into the alimentary canal of man, may develop therein. METHOD OF EXAMINATION . Various processes are used to determine the potability of water, but perhaps the most common one is known as the Sedgwick-Rafter method. It is the one in general use, and is the method pursued at the State University. A fresh sample of water obtained in a bottle or other vessel which is absolutely clean is brought to the laboratory, and a measured amount, usually 500 c. c., is poured into a glass graduated funnel made for the purpose (Fig. 2). Previous to this a perforated rubber cork has been placed in the bottom of the funnel; on top of the cork is a disk of bolting cloth, and on top of that about an Ti" inch of clean sand, preferably ground quartz, and Hso the whiter the better. This 500 c. c. of sample —and will, if left to itself, gradually filter, but the pro- cess is usually hastened by attaching a glass tube, passed through the rubber cork, to an aspirator by means of a rubber tubing, or to some other mechan- ical contrivance, which will hasten the process. In -joº our laboratory we connect the funnel with a stoppered so | bottle, and exhaust the air in this bottle by means of the reversed action of a pneumatic injection syringe, thus rapidly drawing the water into the bottle. This rapid filtration is of particular value in lessening the settling of some of the organisms on the sloping sides of the funnel. When all the water has passed through the sand, and before the latter has time to dry in the least, the stopper is removed and the sand, which then contains practically all, or nearly all, the organisms present in the 500 c. c. of sample, is washed into a test-tube with a known amount of distilled water. The usual amount taken for this washing is 5 c. c. The sand thus agitated C. C. -500 -350 -(250 —H200 —150 Fig. 2. A AN AI.YSIS () F I) RIN KING WATER. 5 quickly sinks again to the bottom of the test-tube, but the organisms, far lighter than the sand, remain suspended in the liquid, which is immediately decanted into another tube. The sand then receives a second Washing with the same amount of distilled water, which is decanted as before. These two washings practically free the sand of organisms. In our 10 c. c. of liquid thus obtained it is manifest, then, that we have a concentration of all the organisms in the 500 c. c. of sample, or, as technically expressed, the “degree of concen- tration ’’ is 50, that is, we have all the organisms first con- tained in 500 c. c. in one-fiftieth as much liquid. To insure accuracy in this washing a graduated pipette is generally used, or an automatic burette. The biologist then makes use of a specially prepared cell, formed by cementing a brass frame to a thick glass slide (Fig. 3), which cell is constructed to hold exactly 1 c. c. | The 10 c. c. of concentrated sample in t. t. are agitated to insure of the organisms being evenly distributed through the liquid, and exactly 1 c. c. of this is placed in cell by means of a graduated pipette (Fig. 3) ; the coverslip shown in the drawing is then slid over the sample and made to rest evenly on the brass frame. This cell is then placed on the stage of a good microscope, into the eyepiece of which an ocular micrometer is fitted, made ex- pressly for this work. (Fig. 4). The largest Square, when used with certain combinations Fig. 4. of ' tube length, subtends just one square 6 AN AI.YSIS OF D FINKING WATER. millimeter of the field on the stage. For the sake of con- venience in counting, this large Square is divided into four, as shown in the t º figure, and one of these four into twenty-five smaller squares. One of these smaller squares is subdivided into twenty-five minute Squares, each of which is called a ‘‘ standard unit.’’ | “... These ‘‘ units '' are of value in determin- - 4 — H ing the amount of amorphous matter in – 3 — e Sample. - 2 – The next step is to focus the micro- F3:4::. scope upon the sample of water in cell ...;; and count the organisms contained with- §3 º' : in area of the larger square of the ocular micrometer. To obtain a fair average of the number of organisms contained in sample, the slide is moved about until ten — or better — twenty different squares have been counted. The Whole Fig. 5–An apparatusro.com. number of organisms counted, plant or º: animal, divided by the number of any desired level. squares counted, ten or twenty, as the case may be, will give the average number in one square ; this multiplied by one thousand will give the average number of organisms contained in the entire counting cell. But the “degree of concentra- tion ” of the contents of the cell is 50, hence we must divide this product by 50 and the result will be the number of organisms in 1 c. c. of sample. For example, if twenty counts gave eight hundred micro-organisms one could make a formula as follows : % × 1000+50 = 800 organisms per c. c. of sample, Which, if it obtains throughout the year, is a high a Verage. - - This reckoning cannot be exact, for the sample may not have been properly obtained ; some organisms may remain in the sand ; some cling to the sides of funnel; all may not have been decanted, or the organisms may be very unevenly dis- tributed in the counting cell. Nevertheless, the general aver- age obtained from the calculations is not sufficiently out of the way as to cause error in judgment as to the potability of NoTE-For the use of the cuts illustrating Figs. 2, 3. 4 and 5 We are indebted to the courtesy of Richards & Company, Broadway, New York City, makers of apº for Water analysis. - - ANALYSIS OF D RIN KING WATER. 7 the water. It is claimed that by this method “results are usu- ally precise within ten per cent. i. e. two examinations of the same sample seldom differ by more than that amount.” It is evident that an accurate knowledge of microscopic organisms, both plant and animal, is necessary in order to place true value upon one’s analysis, for the presence of some organisms is very significant, and the presence of others may be looked for in almost any sample however potable. Of bac- teria, the germ of typhoid fever is the one most to be feared in ordinary water supplies. As a matter of fact, disease germs are especially hard to detect in water samples. The minute size of a typhoid bacillus, for example, renders it improbable that a microscopical examination will detect it, even though there may be many in the five hundred cubic centimeters of sample. Nevertheless, while the actual dis- covery of these germs in water may be compared to the pro- verbial finding of a needle in a haystack, still the miscroscope may give evidence of the possible existence of typhoid germs by disclosing organisms and forms of sediment which are not found to any great extent in pure drinking water. The dis- covery of many forms of infusoria, particles of fungi like mold, water mold, etc., and such particles as starch grains, yeast cells, muscle fibers, epithelial cells, silk, wool, and cot- ton fibers, minute fragments of paper, of feathers, and of fibers of wood, may be indicative of sewage contamination, for such things are found in sewage. Investigation as to the disposal of sewage in the vicinity would determine the accu- racy or the contrary of such an influence. In any case such water is not drinkable, and the presence of so much organic matter of that nature makes it a favorable tenement for dis- ease germs like typhoid. Water from stagnant pools, too, containing ciliated infusoria, water mold, mold hyphae, green slime, putrefactive bacteria, insects’ scales, etc., should not be used for drinking purposes. Water supplies are classified as follows: Rain water—Purest of all supply. Minute organisms, if any, coming from the air and generally not to be discovered by method discribed here. Ground water—The water found in springs and wells comes under this head. Originally rain water, it has filtered through the ground and is thus freed from micro-organisms. It is rich in inorganic matter, however, which, when the water comes to the surface, affords a culture for minute plant 8 ANALYSIS OF DBINKING WATER. life which is not found as long as the water is excluded from the light. The danger in drinking water from a dug well in a thickly settled town or city has been emphasized in the beginning of this report ; surface water, as the term is gen- erally used, is pretty sure to find its way into the well, par- ticularly in Oregon, where we have a long rainy season, with possible contamination from Outhouses, stables, kitchen waste, etc. Even driven wells, although the inlet is out of the reach of surface water, are not entirely free from organ- isms, albeit the presence of such betokens no danger. I refer to the growth of a fungus, Cremothrix, which is sometimes’ found attached to the pipes of the driven wells. Surface water—In this division we include waters of lakes, ponds, rivers, etc. This water is apt to be rich in organ- isms, the minimum amount being found in Swiftly running" water and the maximum in standing water. Water drawn from swift-running rivers where there is no danger of defile- ment by sewage, and stored in reservoirs of small enough size to insure frequent refillings will be remarkably free from organisms. If, however, our running stream comes from a pond or lake, we may, naturally, expect to find more or less of the organisms which flourished in said pond or lake. This brings us to a discussion of water in storage reservoirs, which are characteristic of water supplies of towns and cities. Micro-organisms deleterious to drinking water are bound to occur in reservoirs, the lower layers of water being quiescent. If however, the reservoirs are covered, the water thus being protected from the light, there is little or no trouble from this Source. What precautions should be taken by a city or by a water company to insure its patrons against not only danger- ous drinking water, but also against any and all disagreeable features in the water supply such as turbidity, Odor, color in solution, etc., factors which are particularly offensive although they may not be dangerous. In the first place, the source of Supply must be pure running water if possible, the intake screened of course, and the reservoirs should be protected from any possible thoughtless or vicious act at the hands of irre- sponsible parties. Secondly, and this is of extreme import- ance, a frequent withdrawal of water and a thorough cleaning of reservoir is a necessity appreciated by all conscientious water companies or city officers having the water supply in charge. In some localities there are two or more storage res- ervoirs permitting of the cleaning, drying and airing of one, while other varities are in use. AN ALYSIS OF DIRIN ECING WATER.. 9 ODOJES IN DRINECING WATER, . To such a nicety has the Science of biological examination progressed that the presence of certain organisms can be inferred by the odor of the water. An “aromatic ’’ odor, for instance, denotes the presence of diatoms, minute and uni- cellular plants, while a certain genus of Single-celled animals, when present in sufficient numbers, imparts an odor of “can- died violets '' to the water. The presence of different genera of Cyanophyceae, a lowly tribe of plants, is recognized by odors designated as “grassy,” “grassy and moldy,’’ ‘‘green corn odor,” “masturtium odor,” etc. Some plants give off a “fishy” odor; the odors of some single-celled animals are characterized as “fishy and oily,” “fishy like rockweed,” “fishy like clam shells,” “ripe cucumber odor,” “salt marsh odor,” etc. THE COLOR OF D RINIKING WATER . Color in solution is due to vegetable matter dissolved in the water. When such is the case it is quite harmless, though, if must be confessed, exceedingly disagreeable. The color may be but slight, or, when Swamp land is drained, the water may be as dark as the strongest tea. Note our streams in this state coming from swampy sections, which streams may be fairly clear in the dry season, but will quickly become brown, or dark brown, at the advent of the first rains. Color due to particles in suspension, i. e., turbidity, must be distinguished from color in solution. - - ARE THESE ORGANISMS FOUND IN WATER, APART FROM DIS- EASE GERMS AND PARASITES, INJURIOUS TO HUMAN BEINGS, AND, IF SO, WHAT PER CENT IS TO BE REGARDED AS DANGEROUS 7 - There is no question but that people in ordinarily good health can and do use drinking water which contains a larger or smaller amount of organisms, and do not suffer therefrom. Yet it is equally true that they may be, particularly those of a delicate physique, more or less affected. The thought of taking micro-organisms along with our drinking water into the alimentary canal is not pleasant to say the least, and par- ticularly is this so when their presence is evident to the eye or nose. Furthermore, a new-comer in a vicinity where the drinking water is rich in organisms, if he has been ac- | () ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER. customed to pure water, may be unpleasantly affected. If the new-comer be a child, there is all the more likelihood of intestinal disorder. Quite apart from this phase of the ques- tion, these organisms, when they find their way into the service pipes, which are dark, die and decompose, becoming filled with putrefactive bacteria (even in Open reservoirs not properly cleaned this will happen), and thus vitiate the Watel'. In a general way it may be said that the presence of much organic matter in water gives rise to conditions favorable to the growth of bacteria other than the species which accom- pany putrefaction, which bacteria may be harmful, in other words, may be disease germs. The occurrence of conditions favorable to the existence of the typhoid bacillus has been alluded to before. The writer wishes to particularly empha- size the following points: Do not use water for drinking which comes from dug wells in a thickly settled community without first Subjecting it to a thorough boiling. On a farm do not be too swre because the land slopes from the well to the barnyard, that there may not be contamination from the barm and other out-houses in its vicinity. Avoid all possible danger from Sewage contamination in any shape. Insist upon systematic cleanliness in the administration of your city water Supply. To which might be added the following injunction : Do not drink water in which there is a marked turbidity or any odor whateve". If you are 80 situated that you have to use such water for drinking purposes, boil it before using. Reservoirs have yielded five thousand and six thousand micro-organisms per c. c., and in stagnant water used for drinking I have found a very much higher record. Some brook water on the other hand may make a showing as low as two micro-organisms per C. c., and Spring water even less. Five and six thousand micro-organisms per c. c., if found to occur frequently in different seasons, should condemn the water. However, a microscopic examination alone is not sufficient to reject a sample of water, but should lead, if sus- picious, to a study of the environment of a water supply. And it may be said that a microscopic examination alone will show as much as a chemical examination alone, while a microscopic examination, with a study of the environment, A N A LYSTS (DF DIRIN KING WATER. | 1 is all that is necessary to decide as to the potability of the water Supply. WORIK AT THE UNIVERSITY. The biological laboratory is well equipped for water analy- sis, having high-power microscopes and all necessary appara- tus. We will gladly make examinations of water when such work does not interfere with regular college duties. A quart of water should be sent. The bottle or jar used should be absolutely clean before the sample is introduced, and it should be sent to the university at once, before there has been any chance for the organisms contained therein to change. All charges for carriage must be prepaid. Respectfully, - F. L. WASHBURN, State Biologist. METRIC EQUIVELANTS—l cubic centimeter, c. c.–.061027 c. u. inch; 500 c. c.3-7% of a pint; 1 millimeter, m. m. = ºr of an inch. 12 AN AI, YSIS OF DRINKING WATER. EXPLANTATION OF PI, ATE I . Pen and ink sketches of organisms found (with the excep- tion of the typhoid bacilli) in analysis of water in the Bio- logical Laboratory. An X followed by a figure or figures de- notes the number of times the drawing has been enlarged. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, types of unicellular plants called Diatoms, X 500. 6, 7 and 8, types of Desmids; also umicellular plants, X 250. 9, two stages of Protococcus, X 500; an Alga, so-called, giving a green- ish color to water if abundant. 10, Nostoc (?), X 500; a non-branching filamentous “alga,” rare in drink- ing water. - 11, Cremothrix, X 500 ; a colorless filamentous plant, or brownish on account of presence of ferric oxide. Grows well in the dark. 12, Oscillaria, X 500; a bluish-green filamentous ‘‘ alga.” 13, Spirogyra, X 125; a multicellular plant. 14, Zyguema, X 125; a multicellular plant, allied to the foregoing. 15, Ulothrix, X 125; a filamentous multicellular plant. 16, Euglypha, X 250; a minute animal belonging to the Protozoa. 17, Actinophrys, X 250; a Protozoan. 18, Euglena, X 500; a single-celled animal, worm-like in form and in action. 19, Phocus, X 500; another Protozoan, with the preceding, quite Com- mon in drinking water. 20, Vorticella, X 250; another single-celled animal, a member of the group Protozoa. 21, Euplotes, X 250; a single-celled Protozoan. 22, Paramoecium, X 250; another member of this very large group. 23, Diglena, X 150 ; a m croscopic worm belonging to the Rotifera. 24, Brachionus, X 180; inother Rotiferan. 25, Microdon, X 150; a third type of the Rotifera. 26, Typhoid Bacillus, two of the figures showing stained flagella. × 1000. * * * * * * ~ *.* * • * * g • * * . ºve"Cºdºgºteac.º de g -* § PLATE I. ><2 I'- :: & * | b: º . . " |ºlijä | ºš|. | . | ... • = . e-º-º-º-º-º-º: º . - = - º * * * * • . - - - >J \ S. º & Y sºś g== Sºº- => A-> º: . . ... ." a 2.º §:===#| || G ==% É. : : : e * ſº % -- ſº ºº: º ; ==ºes | ſºlº!' | |E * - ſºlº l, | iſ . ! ºf ſºlº | º .W. Trillſº * . | i lſº Hº Ei. | t | s- . :hº| :i.& ::& : |s * º - W Hijº. #º * * & tº e - º -sº & .-.- :.**.-:...::e ---e-te-.*....--& :.-&.-.- - . * * w sºm I ... : . . . . ." | * | * § 3 - . - * : - - - * * : *, * & | ſº, ill; ... . . . . . . . = : à APPENDIX F. WORK ON EASTERN 0YSTERS, SUMMER OF 1900. work ON EASTERN oystERs, SUMMER OF I. 9 OO. The summer's work consisted in testing the cement tank constructed the previous season. This tank was built in the tideland and was nine feet by eighteen feet at top, four feet by seven feet at bottom and seven feet deep. The sides and bottom of the excavation in the tideland were lined with heavy lumber and then covered with Portland cement to the thickness of four inches, the cement being mixed with sand. A three-inch iron pipe led from the bottom of the tank to the neighboring slough, for it was first intended to fill or par- tially fill the tank by means of the rising tide. Both ends of this pipe were guarded by valves, thus regulating the inflow. Sinking this tank in the tideland was a mistake, for during the storms and high tides of last winter the tank was badly injured, and in the early summer Workmen who were repair- ing it wrote me that it was impossible to prevent the water in the mud outside the tank from seeping through ; that is, that the cement placed in the bottom could not harden be- fore the water outside forced its way through, thus making a small leak in the bottom. This seepage from without in was but slight, yet the water so entering was dark in color, and had a disagreeable odor like that of bilge water. It was too late, of course, to make any change in the construction, and we went ahead with the experiment, relying on the hope that as the tank filled the inside pressure would be great enough to keep out this impure water. Further, inasmuch as the water at low tide in the bay and sloughs is of a temperature 65° to 70°, and saltness, 1.016, favorable for the development of eastern Oyster spawn, it was evident that some means must be devised to keep the tank filled with such water and not allow the ingress of high-tide water, which is too cold, 50° to 60° Fahrenheit, and too salty, 1.022 to 1.024, for the embryo of this oyster we seek to intro- 16 IREPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST. duce. To that end we procured a force-pump and about forty- five feet of hose and pumped water daily at low tide into the tank, at the same time aerating it by moving the free end of the hose about, so that the fresh Salt water would be forced through the water already in. This method of aeration has been found sufficient. Evaporation, and consequent increase of salinity, was compensated for by the Occasional addition of a little warm fresh water. The tank was further protected by a canvas covering, which served not only as a shade against excessive heat in the daytime, but also prevented dissipation of heat at night. By these means a temperature of about 68° Fahrenheit and a salinity of from 1.016 to 1.020 was maintained in the contents of the tank, con- ditions quite favorable to the success of the experiment, eliminating the possible contamination of the water above re- ferred to. - t The two illustrations included herewith show a near view of tank and its tentlike cover, and the pump in position on float in foreground. - . - Into the tank from time to time were poured swimming embryos of eastern oysters obtained in laboratory. It takes about twelve days from the time of hatching for an eastern oyster embryo to attach itself to some collector, becoming what is known as ‘‘ Oyster spat.” Hence, on September 1, about fifteen days from the time the last consignment of em- bryos were placed in tank, the water was let out and the tile collectors therein carefully examined. A few oyster spat were found, too small at that stage to tell whether they were spat of the eastern oyster or of our west coast oyster which may have been introduced from the slough through the pump and hose. On account of pressing college duties, I have not been able to visit Yaquina Bay since last September to deter- mine the exact results of experiment. I regret to say, how- ever, that the water in the bottom of the tank, in the extreme bottom, was discolored, as was the bottom itself, from seep- age through cracks from the tideland. Another time I should construct tanks above tideland, where they could not be affected by tide or storm. CONCLUSIONS, EXPENSES, ETC. In the summer of 1890, all conditions conspiring favor- ably, there was an immense catch of eastern oysters in San Francisco Bay; that is, spawn from Oysters planted there de- REPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST. 17 veloped and large numbers were found fastened to rock, piling, etc., all over the southern part of the bay. Since that particularly favorable year dealers in Oysters in San Fran- cisco claim there has been but little increase, though they have to acknowledge that the spawn from eastern oysters planted there does develop to some extent. While Yaquina Bay is the most favorable place on our coast for eastern oyster culture, the water of the bay is, at high tide, cold and salt, and I have practically abandoned all hope of spawn developing in the bay itself, although the east- ern oysters themselves thrive wonderfully, and we know they spawn. Of course, it is possible, through a happy combina- tion of circumstances, that Some seasons at Yaquina may offer unusually fine conditions and eastern “spat '' may re- sult. The summer of 1900 offered seemingly fair conditions for natural spawning, the water and atmosphere being quite warm, and I have tendered a reward for the first five eastern spat brought me as a result of last Summer's spawning. I have confidence, however, in our ability to Secure spat in prop- erly constructed and properly managed tanks, and believe that said spat when placed in the waters of the bay will thrive and may prop- agate naturally whem mature. In this connection I might add the statement of Dr. H. F. Moore, an oyster expert connected with the United States Fish Commission, who was detailed to visit this coast in 1899 and report upon the condition of the experiments. Dr. Moore reports as follows: “So far as I could learn, there is no evidence that the east- ern oyster has ever naturally spawned here ; or, rather, that there has ever been a set of spat. I think that the cold water here will prevent that, under ordinary conditions, but I be- lieve that in shallow ponds suitably constructed, and with proper precautions against the deposit of silt on the cultch, spat may be Taised for subsequent planting in the open bay,” thus substan- tiating, in a measure, my opinion on this subject. During the last summer the United States Fish Commis- sion showed its interest in the experiments of the State Biolo- gist by appropriating a small sum for the summer’s work, the amount appropriated by the state for this purpose having been exhausted. The commission, however, is of the opinion that each state should pay the expenses of all such experi- mentation. It is needless to add, perhaps, that the small sum set aside for this work by our legislature of 1898 was 18 REPORT OF STATE BIOI, OGIST . used with economy and judgment and has yielded good re- turns in the shape of further knowledge upon this important subject, upon the matter of water temperatures of Yaquina Bay, and, incidentally, upon the vital question of preserving the native oyster industry, which is threatened with extinc- tion unless measures are taken to prevent. INTRODUCTION OF LOBSTERS. A member of our delegation in congress promises me to do all he can to secure an importation of eastern lobsters for planting on this coast next season under the direction of the State Biologist. It is to be hoped he will succeed in his efforts. New York ºf it. LipšARY § FEB20 1934 ... " 2. r: rs at sº jºy ºf M ;: #7 DocuWENT - e 2, ºf THIRD BIENNIAL REPORT SN N Aºr YA".6 Nº. Á,% \ Sº, º - $ §§ : WWii, & §§ #. . *. tº #Q} Ø\'. 2: % • Af * Af we" A *s SAILEM, OTREGON WILLIS S. DUNIWAY, STATE PRINTER 1908 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, | November 20, 1908. To His Ea:cellency, the Governor, Geo. E. Chamberlain, Salem– SIR : In accordance with the laws of Oregon, I herewith present the fourth biennial report of the State Biologist. e The experiments with the Eastern oysters have shown that it is impossible to make them breed in these waters because of the low temperature, and attention is being turned to native oysters and the possibility of increasing the supply on the natural beds or stocking new localities, the latter being of special interest in Coos Bay, where at present the Oyster is extinct though at one time flourishing abundantly. It seems very desirable that the appropriation should be continued that part of it may be used in such experiments. Some attention has been given to the habits of the crab and shell fish with a view to protective legislation, and the attempting of some experiments in artificial propagation. Also work has been begun on the fresh water fishes which it is hoped may be continued in the future. Respectfully, ALBERT R. SWEETSER. EXC M A N Gº. Muniv ERsiTY OF MINNEROrä LABRARY ji)(a 2'- " . REPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST. UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, Eugene, November 20, 1908. During the past two years the State Biologist has under- taken the following lines of work: First—A continuation of the oyster experiments in Yaquina Bay. Second—A preliminary biological survey of the region around the mouth of the Umpqua River. Third—A reconnaissance of Coos Bay, with a view of at- tempting to restock these waters with the native oyster. Fourth—An examination of the fauna and flora of the water and land round about Sunset Cove. Fifth–The gathering of material for the study of the breed- ing habits of the crab ; and, Sixth–The study of some of the common fresh water fish, their habits and parasites. OYSTER EXPERIMIENTS. Sunken Float. A large sunken float was built having sixty feet of inside surface, floated by two large logs, and provided with doors on the top, the bottom being submerged about a foot. The water had free access to the inside of the float and was continually being changed so that the interior was prac- tically as pure as the surrounding water. This was towed up Yaquina River in June, 1907, to a point known as the Ship Yard, about a mile above Oysterville. It was found that the temperature on the inside of the float was usually slightly higher than the temperature of the outside waters. The bottom was covered with a layer of clean shells; on this were placed over three hundred Easten'n Oystem's which had been carefully culled to remove, so far as possible, all native Oysters; over these was placed another layer of clean shells, and on top of all twenty-three tiles, slightly concave and hav- ing the concave side down. At the close of the season the shells and tile were found covered with spat (Figure 1), but whether Eastern or native it was difficult to say, and were free from barnacles. The float was carried back to Oysterville and the shells and tile removed to the Oyster beds. In Novem- ber, 1908, some of the tiles were taken up and photographed (Figure 2). On examination these proved to be the native oyster, Ostºia lun'ida, and no evidence of Eastern spat was found. The spat of the first season (Figure 1, Title 1) were 4 REPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST. on the average 15.1 millimeters (.59 inches) by 12.5 milli- meters (.49 inches). Those of the second season (Figure 2) were 24.5 millimeters (.96 inches) by 23.0 millimeters (.90 inches). The spat at the close of the second year have three times the shell area that they had at the end of the first season. These results suggest other problems: 1. The feasibility of raising spat on a larger scale by some similar method and restocking the beds which are rapidly being depleted. 2. The possibility of gradually accustoming these oysters to a lower degree of salinity and thus enabling them to grow in an environment unfavorable to the barnacles. - Antificial Environment. An attempt was made to imitate artificially the temperature condition favorable for spawning and to keep the young oysters for a time under these condi- tions. A small tank was so arranged that a current of Salt water was constantly passing through and kept at a tem- perature ranging between 70 F. and 80 F. Shells were placed on the bottom. The plan was to artificially fertilize the ova and liberate them into the tank. Either because of the old age of the Eastern oyster or for some other reason it was impossible to accomplish this, and at the time the experiment was made no results were obtained. With young and vigorous individuals there are possibilities of success if the experiment were continued for some considerable time. If a few ripe oysters were also placed in the tank as well as the artificially fertilized ova natural fertilization might be induced. Analysis of Oystem's for Copper. The striking coppery fla- vor of our native oysters, which is especially noticeable the first few times they are eaten, has led some to imagine that they might really contain more copper than the Eastern Oyster. To settle this point analyses were made in the chemi- cal laboratory of the Eastern Oysters planted in Yaquina Bay, of the Olympias, and of the Netarts oysters. The analysis of the native Yaquina Bay oysters was lost through a mishap in the process of analysis. Each sample was drained in a funnel and the liquid and solid portions analyzed separately, the copper being estimated by the electrolytic method. The results were as follows: º Eastern Oysters from Yaquina Bay. . .0038 per cent Olympias, first sample. . . . . . . . . . . . . .0025 per cent Olympias, second sample. . . . . . . . . . . .0021 per cent Netarts Oysters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0023 per cent From this it is seen that the Eastern Oyster fattened on this coast has more copper than the natives. UMPQUA RIVER, e A little time was given to collecting and studying the crabs and shell fish at the mouth of the Umpqua River, and On the REPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST. 5 adjacent beaches. An interesting species of crab was found living in the same shell with certain clams, but has not been fully classified. The special object of interest, however, was the edible crab, Cance?" magisten'. A number of individuals of different ages were collected (Figure 3). Those of edible size are fairly abundant at present, but with the increase of population and the improvements in transportation they are likely to be rapidly thinned out, as is the case in some of the other bays along our coast. Along the beach some shells were picked up which were apparently oyster shells, but which differed from our native oysters. As they were for the most part well smoothed and rounded, it is difficult to say whether they were brought from a considerable distance or were thrown up from some neighboring reef. There were also indications in many places between the Umpqua and Coos Bay of beds of razor clams. The writer feels confident that if he had had more time at his disposal he could have located such beds. COOS BAY AND OYSTERs. It is well known by the inhabitants of this region, and can be easily shown to any one visiting the bay that there were at one time large beds of native oysters in these waters. De- posits of the old shells are to be seen in many places, and the Government dredge brings them up in great numbers, but they were exterminated by some catastrophe the nature of which is now unknown. The Indians have a tradition that this was brought about by the great forest fires which at One time swept over the whole coast. They believe that the waters were heated, by radiation or by the glowing embers falling into them, and the Oysters destroyed. Some have asked why the clams did not suffer also. The Oyster is practically help- less, and if an abundance of mud or sediment is suddenly heaped upon it, may be suffocated, since it cannot move from its position, and has no tube or siphon which it can push through this layer up into the pure water above. The clam on the other hand, has a foot which enables it to move with a greater or less rapidity, and a siphon with which it can reach out toward clear water. If this conflagration had any- thing to do with the destruction of the Oysters the result would seem to be due rather to the sudden accumulation of ashes washed in by the rains and the burying up of the shell fish, thus causing the death of the helpless Oysters, while many of the clams might escape. The following table gives the results of the Observations up to the time of the writing of this report : REPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST. | ·tſartus ‘A‘A F---AAOTI ·|UCIOQQO8I# "IZOI19· ſ ·ą 00-9 I---------------------------------------------------.(9}.{OCI | 8 * UſºļļUCIS º AA º „H|-~~~~ worI|«-» -> • • •-, «=908).ItìS3. ‘IZOI/9‘IŲ ºdſ06-9 I---------------------------------------------------.I Đºļ.IOCI8 * [[ſ]! LUIS ’ AA 'JHpºde‘SUI Z|+- - - - - -->uíonnog* #ãOI99* W ‘J’ 08’I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -AAO3$'\}[{)1. * UſºļļUCIS º AA ”JI IT C!C! 9 *SUI Z|-~~~~~ ĐOt3.J.InŞ3°8′ZOI99·m a og -t -------------------------------------------------AAO3Sºlº|ſ) || 1, * UĮ Į Į LUIS • AA ”JI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ worI ------ULIOQQORI | 9 ‘IZOI69.ro -a ot ºg I-------------------------------------------------.\\O3° B[#) | 9 ·ųņțults* AA 'JH IT T T T T worI ------�O'BJ.Ilm $*[30I69·ſ) at OI ºg I---------------;----------------------------------4*\\O3Suſ [{){) ·ų, ſuis · AA (H ---- ųāſ H --~~~~UULO? QO8 | 8 °830I89· , , , og -tt |-------------------------------------------------AAOēStBIÊ) | 9 º qņțUUS ’ AA ’H·U[3ȚIH|«= ± • • • •00t?J.I n S | 3 “8ZOI89· je v og -ſt -------------------------------------------------.\\Ož3st8I£) | 9 *) O( ) *.I Đ$400 AAS “\\[ *V| - - - - - -->AAOTI------90'l3.J.In.S8 ºg TÔI#$)‘WI *V 00 ‘6~~~~ J 0.\!\{ $OOO JO UIQ nOULI OLI 4 0.\O({t} 00 LIBQS ĮpQ JOUIS3I *.10SQ00 AAS “H ‘V|-----AAOTI|«-» -, , «-> *= <==ĐOBJJ ThŞ° J, IOI#9· ſ · y oo-6 |----------------------------------„IQ.\{\{ SOOO JO UIQ n'OIN3I * I3S400.\\$ “H ‘V- - - - -.\\OTI~~~~oovians”OZOI79· ſ ·y og ºg I-------------------------------------------------AAO3Suſ [±)€Ľ “…I º SQ00 AAS “\{ *V|-+ - - - ----AAOTI|• • • • • • • •=90'G.J.I thŞ8 °6TOII9· · ·y og ºg I---------------------------------------UȚ3 lmOISUĮ DUI BIIȚAA || Z.I *„Iºsq00.\\$ *\{ *V ( ~ ~ ~ ~AAOTI|«-» , «-» , «= 4=��13.J.Ill.S8°03()[39· ſ · y oorg |---------------DUI 0£I U[4) ON DUIB DI 0J UIS.I^3IN CIÒ 0.\\'] 08I || @I º D.I^3AORI ',H ' ['------------|--→ -+ - - - -Đ0^{3.J.I til S3 °830I89· je poºgt . |--------------------------------------------|DUI ©{I UIQ I ON# ºp.ſt3-A ORI ‘JĀ “ ['------------= = ** • *= =,0073.J.I.D.S*IZOI89· ſ ·ą 00-9 I--------------------------------------------ĮDU[08 Uſºļ.ION | 8 * į).tºU}.\ O{{º\!{ ' [|-- - - - - - - - - - - -• • • • • •=. --��13.J.IT’ Şþ *IZOI8%)'w… 00.9 |--------------------------------------------DUI Đ{{ [[Q.ION || Z. * D.I 'BAO8I º H ' ['- - - - - - - - - - - - -|<!-- - - - - -ĐOl3.J.In.S9 (330I9 °69· × 60-gt --------------------------------------------ÞÚIÐ SI U[Q.ION3‘Qdº S *p…I'\}AORI ‘JĀ "[^|------------|• • • • • •=. •90'l3.J.In.S3 °030ſ{}^{9· IN 00 ‘ZI | ~~~~ ~~~~~ºr – – – – – – – – – + – – – – – ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -þUI 0£I UIQ.ION | 93 * DJ'l3AORI ‘JH ' ['|------------|• • • • •=& !»0%)^3}.InS’8IOI8p· · ·y obºg |--------------------------------------------Į) CI 0{{ {{!}.ION | 93 * l).ſt3-\O8I º){ * ['-+ - --> --> --> <!-- - - - - - -->• • • • «-» -→99t3.J.Ill.S& ’030I89· · ·ą oſo-, I--------------------------------------------þUI 98, UſºļJION | g3 ºp.ſt3.\OEI ’NH ' [' ~~~~t|5 || H.------0%)t}JJ LAS* † 30IIg· · ·ą 00-g |--------------------------------------------þUI 0£[ [[Q.IONgº ºp.113.\og • H • (: - - ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~| «= <!--* * * * * = -w0013.J.I n S6 " IZOI(){)· , 00-gt 1--------------------------------------------l) ll 08I UIQ.ION | G, KIT. [º * I3AIØscļOººp ĮJĮ,|'qqď0CI ·&ſuſtes | mišËài* 9UDIȚI,* \ſqſ ſuoor I‘9ņu CI °CH WIĘIV QL REPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST. 7 It is possible that at some time a sudden and unusually severe freshet may have reduced the salinity to a point below the endurance of the oyster. At present it seems highly probable that if the native oysters were planted in the bay they would grow and multiply. With this plan in view an examination was made of the surrounding shores, and a point near Glasgow selected as a favorable site for the development of beds. Some temperature and salinity observations were made, and these will be continued at intervals throughout the winter. If all the indications prove favorable and the appro- priation for the work of this office is available for another year, it is planned to bring in and plant a considerable number of sacks of our native oyster in April or May. The beds will be prepared by putting down a layer of clean shells and scat- tering the Oysters on top of this, placing on these another layer of clean shells to furnish a chance for the young spat to fix themselves. SUNSET COVE. This is a small bay opening directly to the Ocean twelve miles from Marshfield, and a few miles south of the Coos bar. The coast at this point is precipitous, with flanking reefs, furnishing an ideal collecting spot, and yielded in the short time that was given to it evidences of a very varied fauna and flora. Plans are on foot to establish a seaside laboratory for the University of Oregon at this point, and it may be desirable for the State Biologist to conduct experi- ments here also, if funds are available, which shall have both scientific and economic value, such as a study of the habits of the crab and the possibility of breeding them in captivity; a description of the food fishes of the region; also a scientific description of the fauna and flora of the water and adjacent land. Ei)IBLE CRABS. (Cancer Magister.) For several seasons the State Biologist has offered to pay a good price for a live female edible crab carrying its eggs. Crab fishermen were all positive that they had seen such, but none could be obtained. In March, 1907, a dead female crab with eggs was found by Mr. Harrison on the beach amongst the seaweed with which it was washed ashore, and sent to me. Figure 4 shows the under side of a female crab without eggs and Figure 5 shows one with the eggs. It will be seen that these are attached to the little swimmerets on the under side . Of the abdomen. They are carried by the female until hatched. During September the beach is often strewn with what people think to be dead crabs, but which prove, on examination, to be the cast-off shells, this being the moulting 8 REPORT OF STATE BIOLOGIST. time for the crab. It is probable that the female is fertilized at this time and then goes out into deep water carrying the eggs. The problem to be worked out is whether it would be possible to keep the females over the winter in a sunken float or corral in such a locality as Sunset Cove, where the water would more nearly approximate that of the deep sea, and liberate the young in the spring in the bay when the other crabs return. FRESH WATER FISH AND PARASITES. From the mill race near Eugene two specimens were ob- tained which abound in our rivers, and have a considerable resemblance to each other. On comparing the heads and mouths a difference is evident. Figure 6 is described by Jordan and Everman as the Squaw Fish or Sacramento Pike, Ptychochielus Oregonensis. Figure 7 by some authors is called Chisel Mouth, Ach?"Ochielus alutaceºus. Each of these was badly infested with parasites, both in the intestinal tract and in the muscular tissues, and on that account would hardly be fit for food. These and other forms may Often be seen in great numbers sporting near the mouth of sewers, appar- ently feeding on the sewage. In the latter part of May some specimens of trout were sent in by Mr. F. A. Anderson, of Goldson, from the mill pond at that place. These were more or less infested by parasites in the form of a round hair-like worm or nematode, which in certain stages of its development becomes inclosed in a sac or cyst in the flesh of the fish. These were reported as being almost entirely confined to the fish of the pond and wanting in those living in the swift water. These do not seem to be due to any disease but may attack any individuals, especially those in sluggish water. - FIG. J. Two tiles (at close of first season). Tile 1. From sunken float, showing spat. Tile 2. From oyster bed, covered with barnacles. Frº. 2. Two tiles (at close of second season). Both from sunken float. |- !\!\! on bditun otſi jo tihnout oun nu pom-pollow (soºus nuo uouip jo solutuaj umo) ºuansınırı, i, ut, quae aequae au L (; -soi) *sāža nnounſw qw to ºluştuaj o jo ºpis tapun atij,ºf_^*(1 + FIG. 5. The under side of a female crab with eggs on the abdomen. * 1 **91, H. ‘º ‘:01, APPENDIX Leaflets Listing and Describing Birds of Oregon LEAFLET NO. 1 JUNE, 1907 INTRODUCTORY NOTE This is the first of what is hoped may be a series of leaflets for the use of the pupils Of Our Schools and Others interested in nature study. Mr. Finley has gained not Only a State but a national reputation, and any Who have heard his lectures or read his articles lºnow that he has accumulated a Stock Of first-hand information On the subject. It is the Object of this leaflet, to give brief directions how to study the birds and more especially to emphasize the fact that the majority Of the feathered tribe assist the farmer and horticulturist, and that their destruction is not only to be depreciated from a sentimental point of view, but may be productive Of a large financial loss. - ALBERT R. SWEETSER. State Biologist. STUDY ()F BIRI)S AND THEIR ECONOMIC VALUE By WILLIAM L. FINLEY. The most important factor in the progress of our present-day education is that book knowledge must be supplemented by original work. Book information must be assimilated by each child working it into his own life through his own experience. The effort of the teacher should be to develop originality in the child and lead him by close observation to think broadly and be self-active. HOW TO INTEREST CHILDREN. If we are to interest children in birds, we must give them something to do and encourage them to observe. The child that plants the seed watches it grow, cultivates the plant till the flower comes, has an interest in the flower that he can obtain in no other way. So the child that provides food and a bath for the birds, finds his interest growing. The first impulse of the boy’s mind is generally to take bird and animal study from the stand- point of the savage. The instinct to catch and kill is uppermost. It comes naturally because the effort of the wild bird or animal is to keep just out of reach. This hunting instinct of the boy may be overcome by using his stratagem to capture the bird confidence by supplying food and water when it is needed, and by furnishing homes for birds and animals that are accept- able. Whenever the boy’s interest grows toward watching, bird habits, and whenever, he feels a responsibility of protecting a creature under his care, [4] his attitude changes. If we can get him to build a bird house and place it about his home, he can easily get tenants. If part of the school work is to report on bird study, he is encouraged to observe. He watches during the period of nest-building and incubation, and then while the young are reared. - - : - - - - With a little encouragement, he will become a staunch protector instead of a destroyer of bird life. It is not a difficult matter for children to make friends with the birds. If one has a yard with some trees and bushes, he may have a real bird retreat. Fortunate is the boy or girl who has a big yard with a tangle of [5] bushes on an old fence, or a few trees and a wild corner where the weeds run riot. It is easy to arrange a shallow dish or basin where fresh water may be kept every day for the birds to bathe and drink. This makes a most attractive bird resort for summer. Then build some bird houses and put them about in the trees or on posts and you are sure to have bird tenants all summer. For the fall and winter, start a bird lunch-counter, by all means. Nail up a box or board just outside your window where you can watch it and where the table may be set without trouble. Keep it supplied with a few cracked nuts, seeds and crumbs. In the coldest weather, suet chopped in fine bits may be put out, or a large piece nailed down so it can be pecked but not dislodged. The news will spread and you will have boarders every day, and one may establish the closest relations with his feathered visitors. Accustom them to your presence gradually and do not make sudden move- ments and the birds will learn not to be afraid. Later you may have the birds come at call or even take a bit from your hand. Such a bird friend- ship is worth working for and such familiarity with the wild birds cannot help but make a boy’s or girl’s life better. - DISCRIMINATE BETWEEN BIRDS. We should not lose sight of the ordinary utility of a bird. Too many of us know little or nothing of their real economic value. As a result we are unjust. We are all too likely to saddle the sins of a particular bird upon the whole tribe. We see a Cooper’s hawk swoop into the yard and strike a chicken and we are immediately out with a gun for every other hawk we can see, regardless of the fact that many of the hawks live almost entirely on Squirrels, gophers, mice, grasshoppers, beetles and the like, and are among the most useful birds we have. It is a grave error to sacrifice a hundred birds, as we do, for the sins of one guilty bird. A man who lives in the country ought to have a common knowledge of bird habits. For his own good and the welfare of the state, he ought to be able to discriminate between good and bad wild birds, just as he learns to distinguish between good and bad domestic birds and animals. Because a blackbird is in a grainfield, it does not signify that he is doing harm. Woodpeckers are often shot for coming into orchards, when a care- ful examination will show that they are destroying injurious insects. There are many instances where birds have been killed because of their destruction to fruit, when an examination of their stomachs showed they were eating more insects than fruit. CHANGES THAT AFFECT BIRD LIFE. When the white men came to the Pacific Coast and began cutting away the forests and plowing the great stretches of land, it naturally made some changes in the bird and animal life of the country. Instead of living on the Seeds of wild weeds and grasses, the birds soon found a new and abundant Supply that man planted in the fields and it is not surprising that many Species, such as blackbirds and quail, took to living on the new food that man brought. Nor is it surprising that one or two species of hawks that were accustomed to live on wild birds and animals took to catching the tame unwary birds that man kept about the yard. Later on, as the native bushes and trees were cleared away and even the grain fields gave way to orchards, the birds changed their nesting places to Orchard trees and to modern homes and they liked the cultivated fruit [6] better than the wild fruit, berries and seeds. For this reason, birds that were almost unknown came to be regarded by some orchardists as enemies because of the fruit and grain they ate. The change of conditions that made food abundant and gave good nesting facilities and killed off the smaller animals that lived to some extent on birds and their eggs and held the bird numbers in check, naturally gave the chance for some birds to be- come more numerous. However, there are few instances where birds become so abundant as to do more real harm than good. For although some of the birds eat fruit, this is not the main part of their diet. The majority of birds are continually hunting and catching insects. During the breeding season, they live largely and rear their young almost exclusively on this food. Wherever insect food is plentiful, the birds resort to such a locality. HOW BIRDS REGULATE OUTEREAKS OF INSECTS. The part that birds play in the economic life is to hold the balance of Nature even by keeping in check the great number of insects and small rodents. They are active at every season of the year. Their rapidity of digestion is remarkable. Many young birds digest food in one or two hours. A young bird will consume about ten times its own weight from the time it hatches till it leaves the nest. Birds often raise two or three broods and they perform a great amount of work. Where insect and animal food is abundant, the birds thrive; where it is lacking, Nature keeps the bird numbers in check. - In certain places where insects and rodents have threatened crops and become abnormally numerous, the birds soon discover the abundance of food and congregate in large numbers. In this way they help to regulate such outbreaks. An example of this was shown a few years ago in a large apple orchard in Central Illinois, that was attacked by cankerworms. Prof. S. A. Forbes of the State Laboratory of Natural History visited the orchard for two successive seasons and collected various specimens of the birds found about that locality. An examination of the stomach contents of these birds showed that the birds were very useful in reducing this outbreak of injur- ious insects. Out of 141 bird stomachs examined, including thirty-six species of birds, it was found that sixty per cent of the birds killed had been eating the canker-worms, and of the thirty-six species seventy-two per cent were eating worms. Taken as a whole, it was found that thirty-five per cent of the food of all the birds of the locality consisted of canker- worms. So we find that during this time when the pest got the upper hand, Nature used the birds to restore the equilibrium. Birds of field and forest were attracted by the bountiful supply of insect food, and birds of all sizes and habits were feeding on worms and reducing the numbers. Out of a flock of thirty-five cedar waxwings, seven birds were shot. With the exception of a few small beetles, it was found that these birds were living entirely on canker-worms. By actual count it was found that there were from seventy to a hundred and one worms in the stomachs of each of these birds. If we assume that as an everage each of these birds ate a hundred of these worms during the day, the flock of thirty were de- stroying three thousand worms a day, or during the month when cater- pillars were out, the flock were destroying ninety thousand. Another instance showing the utility of birds in checking insect pests is shown in the experiments carried on by Prof. Samuel Aughey of the Uni- [7] versity of Nebraska during the outbreaks of the Rocky Mountain locust or grasshopper. These experiments were made between 1865 and 1877, and showed that all the birds of the locality were doing their best to check the outbreak of these injurious insects. Thrushes, kinglets, chickadees, nut- hatches, warblers, vireos, swallows, crows, bluejays, blackbirds, kingfish- ers, cuckoos, woodpeckers, hawks, owls, pigeons, grouse, quail, gulls and even hummingbirds and water birds had all taken to eating locusts. Forty- one locusts were taken from the stomach of a single yellow-headed black- bird. A tiny ruby-throated hummingbird had four small locusts in its stomach. Six robins had eaten two hundred and sixty-five locusts. Sixty- seven locusts were found in the stomachs of three bluebirds, and one little ruby-crowned kinglet had eaten twenty-nine. Many of these and other birds were feeding their young on locusts. One barn owl had eaten thirty- nine locusts. Eight screech owls had eaten two hundred and nineteen locusts. And the hawks were feeding on grasshoppers the same as the owls. STUDYING FOOD OF BIRDS. In order to tell whether a bird is of more value than harm economically, the Department of Agriculture at Washington has for the past fiften years, been making a study of the contents of birds’ stomachs. In various parts of our country and during all the seasons of the year, different species of birds have been taken and the stomachs have been preserved. These are carefully tagged and placed in a solution of five per cent formalin and eighty per cent alcohol. Later on these have been carefully examined and studied by experts who have identified such insects as are eaten, and taken an exact percentage of the various kinds of food eaten. After an examina- tion of a large number of each species these experts have been able to tell exactly the part that these birds take in our economy of Nature, to what extent, if any, the bird is harmful to farmers and orchardists, and to what extent it is beneficial. VALUE OF BIRDS TO AGRICULTURIST AND HORTICULTURIST. Nature has given the birds a special task of holding insect life in check in order to protect plant life. Some birds live by hunting through the leaves and branches, others by hunting the larvae that are in the bark of the tree trunks, others scratch up the fallen leaves and the loose soil, while others are continually engaged in catching the flying insects. In a day’s time the bush-tit and chickadee have been known to eat hundreds of insect eggs and worms that are harmful to our trees and vegetables. A brood of three young chipping sparrows were watched dur- ing one day and they received food a hundred and eighty. Seven times from the parents. A family of four song sparrows seven days old were fed seventeen grasshoppers and two spiders in sixty-seven minutes. The fly- catchers and swallows destroy vast numbers of flies and gnats that annoy horses and cattle. The food of the flicker or woodpecker consists largely of ants; 3,000 of these have been taken from the crop of a single bird. The food of the meadow-lark consists of seventy-five per cent of injurious insects and twelve per cent of weed seed; which shows it is a bird of great economic value. A single robin has been known to eat a hundred and seventy-five caterpillars. One bob-white that was killed had over a hun- dred potato bugs in its craw. Another had eaten two spoonsful of chinch [8] bugs. After the day-flying birds have ceased their work and gone to sleep, the night-hawk is busy catching untold numbers of mosquitoes, moths and other insects. Hawks are especially equipped to catch moles, gophers, mice and squir- rels, and they keep these harmful rodents in check. During the summer a pair of red-tailed hawks will destroy hundreds of squirrels, gophers and mice. The sparrow-hawk lives mostly on grasshoppers, crickets and mice. One bird that was killed had eaten a gopher and thirty-one insects. The hawk hunts by day and the owl by night. The work of the one supple- ments that of the other. Observations show that one owl consumed over six hundred mice in two hundred and forty-six days. The barn owl will capture as many mice and gophers in one night as a dozen cats. |BIRDS AS NATURAL RESOURCES. The birds about a farm may be classed as natural resources. Some birds will destroy a large amount of fruit or grain unless driven from the trees and fields. Sometimes they have to be driven away to save crops. In keeping the birds from eating fruit we compel them to hunt insects; thus instead of being an injury, they are turned to real advantage. According to Weed and Dearborn, in “Birds in Their Relation to Man,” “No prudent farmer will leave the birds out of his plans. He will attract them by ministering to their needs. In his dealings with them he will be guided by the same motives that direct his actions towards his domestic animals. His cattle and his poultry are fed, housed and slaughtered, all for his personal benefit. So long as his animals are more profitable living than dead, he cares for them; when they are fit for market or vicious, he kills them as unhesitatingly as he has nutured them. There is no reason why this same sort of management should not be applied to birds. An unprofitable oriole should be killed as promptly as an unprofitable sheep. But sheep are not slaughtered for their sins or their infirmities so long as they are of more value living than dead. We do not kill our animals for faults we can correct. The flower-loving housewife fences round her posy- bed, covers it with brush, or even applies socks to the feet of the chronic scratchers among her fowls sooner than take their heads off for unearthing Seeds. When birds are turned away from maurauding by some harmless device, not only are their lives spared for good work in the future, but they are often turned to better business at the moment.” Have we the right to clear the land of the natural food of birds and then refuse them the fruit of our trees and the grain of our fields? Should we not provide something for them in return for the good they do us, just as we provide for our domestic fowls? It is a sign of thrift when an orchard- ist or farmer tries to get the most out of the birds about him instead of killing them off. If the birds insist on destroying fruit, there is always a little unused ground about a farm; why not plant a few mulberry trees or Some evergreen blackberries along the fence, or in some out-of-the-way corner let a few seedling cherry trees grow for the birds? The number of birds that are harmful, including those that do slight injury, is so small that we ought to be able to control these. The number of culprits all told is but a small fraction of our birds. PORTLAND, OREGON. | |SSUED BY THE OREGON STATE BIOLOGIST | Leaflets Listing and Describing Birds of Oregon LEAFLET NO. 2 FEERUARY, 19C8 Aº INTRODUCTORY NOTE For this our second loulletin we are again fortunate in llaving a contribution from 1 Mr. Finley, which is 1nnade doubly interesting by Mr. Bohlman’s plmotographs from life. It is hoped that other bulletins may be available later if the appropria- tion is sufficient. The birds here treated, with the exception of the California Purple Finch, are found throughout this State in winter as well as in summer. Agriculturists and horticulturists should endeavor to find out to what extent birds about their hornes are helpful or injurious. In determining the economic relations of any bird, it must be considered front all points of view, and during the entire year or season in which it lives about the locality. - ALBERT R. SWEETSER, State Biologist. SOME COMMON BIRDS OF OREGON With notes as to their economic relation to man By will.IAM L. FINLEY - Illustrated with photographs from life By HERMAN T. BOHLNIAN RED-SHAIFTED FLICKER. The Red-shafted Flicker or Woodpecker (Colaptes cafer collaris) may readily be recognized by the brownish throat and sides of the head, with a black crescent on the upper chest and the breast covered with round black spots. The male has a patch of red on each cheek. When flying away, the flicker may be identified by the snowy-white patch on the rump and the red lining of the wings and tail. The flicker is rather an odd mixture of woodpecker and robin. He climbs straight up the tree trunk, clutching with his claws and using his stiff, pointed tail feathers as a prop, or he sometimes sits like an ordinary percher. Instead of a chisel-shaped bill like other woodpeckers, his is more like a pickax. He has the long elastic tongue that characterizes woodpeckers, and this is covered with a sticky saliva and is thrust out to catch small insects. Like the robin, this bird often digs and hunts in the ground for ants and worms. If the flicker was good for nothing else, he would deserve careful protection because he is the persistent enemy of the ant family. He [10] seems to have been created and equipped largely for this one purpose. Although ants have some use, they are often a great pest. Many kinds of ants are exceedingly harmful. Besides being wood-borers, they infest houses and destroy timber; but the worst of all, perhaps, they protect and Copyrighted 1905 by H. T. Bohlmas RED-shafted FLICKER AT NEST Hol-E care for many aphides or plant lice, which are among the greatest enemies of trees, plants, and shrubs. The flicker also destroys a good per cent of beetles, moths, and other insects. In some of the flicker |11] stomachs that have been examined by Prof. F. E. L. Beal, of the Depart- ment of Agriculture, he says three were completely filled with ants. Two of these each contained more than 3,000 of these creatures, and one con- tained over 5,000. I have heard a few horticulturists complain of the flicker for pecking apples and pears. Investigation shows that these complaints come only from a few sections and are in no way general. As a rule, the damage is comparatively small, and, as a whole, the bird undoubtedly does a great deal more good than harm. west ERN. Roel N WESTERN ROBIN. The Western Robin (Merula migratoria propinqua) is the commonest bird resident about our gardens, orchards, and meadows, and because he is so common, considerable discussion has arisen concerning the amount of fruit he eats. As far as I can learn, the most complaint is found against the robin as a cherry-eater. Cherries ripen early in Oregon, and as it is about the only fruit accessible at the time, the robin's appe- [12] tite is undoubtedly sharpened by his long continued diet of worms. I have talked with many orchardists concerning the amount of harm that is really committed by robins. The earliest cherries are bothered most, while those that ripen later are not disturbed to any extent, because of the other fruits and berries that are ripe by this time. The severest complaints seem to come from places where there are just a few cherry trees about a locality, and to these all the robins from the neighborhood seem to go for a feast. In places where cherry trees are abundant, the loss is so scattering that it is not noticed to a great extent. For instance, in an orchard of 1,700 Lambert cherry trees, a few miles east of Portland, the owner told me the robins destroyed very little, if any, fruit. From the data furnished by the Biological Survey, the table of the robin’s food for the year shows that cultivated fruit is not eaten to any serious extent except during the months of June and July. The amount is 30 per cent during these months, but during the same time the amount of insect food is over 46 per cent, which shows that the benefit exceeds the damage. Scientific research, carried on by the Department of Agri- culture at Washington, shows that for their own interests, horticulturists should try to protect their crops during the short season when the robin may be injurious, and let him live to perform his good work of destroying thousands of insects that are harmful to tree and plant life. Even if the robin was not of real economic value, he surely would be worth something from the esthetic standpoint. What would a June morning mean without the caroling of the robin? He is the boldest bird about our dooryards. He puts himself directly under our protection and builds as near about the house as possible. Who has not watched him hunt for worms on the lawn 7 As an integral part of a child’s life, we need the robin about our homes, even if he does eat fruit. There is always some vacant space about a farm where one or more trees might be planted especially for the birds. It is better to let the birds have a few seedling cherry trees, or as birds are very fond of Russian mulberries, a few of these could be planted. These are good bearers and the birds prefer mulberries to cherries. In this way a few trees planted about a garden or orchard would protect more valuable fruit. WESTERN BLUEBIRD. The Western Bluebird (Sialia mea;icama occidentalis) may readily be told by the blue coat and the brick-red breast, which changes into white on the lower part of the body. In the East he is known as the fore- runner of spring. But in the West, where the winters are not so cold, a few always stay the year around. They are together in flocks during the day and sleep together at night. The bluebird is one of the birds that has taken remarkably to civilization. He formerly built his nest in some hole of an old tree about the woods, but now he prefers a modern home. He prefers to live in a bird house that is put in the back yard or about the barn, or nailed in the crotch of a fruit tree. Although the bluebird often lives about the city, I associate him with country life. I know of no better way to cultivate bird friendship to ad- vantage than to put up bird-boxes in various places about a farm. One is sure to have one or more bluebird tenants, and, with a little care, they [13] become very tame. They not only pay rent in the quality of their singing, but by ridding the trees of many harmful worms. On several different occasions, I have watched the mother and father bluebirds feed their young. In one day's time they have brought in hundreds of green worms, caterpillars, grasshoppers, ants, and other such insects. Over three- fourths of the bluebird’s food consists of various kinds of insects. The bluebird is one of our songsters that is not accused of being injurious. He does not partake of the crops raised by man, although he w EstERN BLUEBIRD AT N Est HOLE IN SLDE OF HOUSE boards himself about the farm and garden. He is gentle and friendly. If undisturbed, he will raise two or three broods during a season. But like other birds, his numbers do not seem to increase. He should receive careful protection by man, for, like other birds, he has many enemies that we know not of. Many birds die of disease or starve to death during the winter, and many are killed by animals. [14] BLUE JAY. Two Blue Jays are common residents through the western part of Oregon. The Steller Jay (Cyanocitta stelleri) may be recognized by its long crest and deep blue coat; upper parts of the body are blackish, changing to rich blue on the lower back and belly. The California Jay (Aphelocoma califormica) looks more like the blue jay of the Eastern woods in color; upper parts are blue, except the back, which is dark brownish or black. The bluish on the throat fades into white on the lower part of the body. His military coat gives him distinction from other birds. A bad reputation in the bird world is as hard to live down, as it is among men. A man’s character may be injured by a false report; so a bird is often condemned by actions that are misinterpreted, or on hearsay. evidence. The man may find recompense, but the bird cannot. The jay is universally known as a robber and murderer: he robs other nests and he eats nestlings. This report has gone the rounds among men so long that many people think a blue jay does nothing else but hunt up mischief. It is mighty hard to persuade some people that any good can come of a blue jay. -- Before we condemn the blue jay, let us consider the real facts against him and weigh the evidence. Grant that one blue jay steals eggs, it is logically false to reason from a particular to a general conclusion and say all jays steal. Professor Beal, of the United States Department of Agriculture, has made a most careful study of the food habits of the blue jay. His results show that 292 stomachs of this bird were examined after being collected in every month of the year in twenty-two different States, the District of Columbia and Canada. The food of the blue jay is composed of 24.3 per cent animal matter and 75.7 per cent vegetable matter. The animal food was made up largely of insects. In all these stomachs, only two showed the remains of birds, one of a young bird and the other of a bird that had likely been found dead. Only three stomachs contained the remains of birds’ eggs, and one of these was taken in October and was evidently an old shell found in some nest. In several other stomachs, the shells of the eggs of domestic fowls were found, but the evidence seemed to show that these were old egg shells picked up about farm houses. It is evident, therefore, that the depredations of the blue jay are not as general as supposed. But here in Oregon some complaint has been made against the blue jay for stealing fruit, and because of its reputa- tion, it is denied protection under the Oregon laws. The injury to fruit by the blue jay seems to be more local in places than it is general. The reports of its destruction have come from places where fruit is not abundant or where an orchard is surrounded by woods and the birds can swoop down, take smaller fruits, and fly back to the woods. As to the home life of the two blue jays here in Oregon, I have never caught either one breaking up the homes of smaller birds, but I know of one case where I was positive a warbler’s nest was robbed by a pair of Steller jays. There is no doubt that a blue jay will at times rob other birds, but we need not interfere for the other birds in this case, for [15] they know how to care for themselves. They hide their nests carefully, and one of the parents is most always on guard about the premises. One reason that makes me think that the blue jay is often wrongly accused, is that I knew of a Steller jay's nest in a patch of woods. I was of the opinion that these birds did little else but hunt up mischief, so I watched the place carefully. Near by I found the nest of a thrush with young birds in it, and also a robin's nest with eggs. The latter was not YOUNG CALL FORN A JAY ABOUT TO LEAVE NEs.T. concealed and I am sure would have been robbed if the blue jays had wanted eggs, but neither of the jays seemed inclined to mischief. In another case, where I saw a pair of these jays about my chicken yard, I thought I would catch them red-handed stealing eggs, as one of them was about an open nest that contained a chicken’s egg. The bird flew down in the yard and picked up a hazelnut and flew back to the fir, where it held the nut between its toes and pounded it. He couldn’t crack it and presently flew off. Several times afterward I saw the same pair about the chicken yard and near the chicken house, but they were merely foraging for nuts and other eatables found about the yard. [16] AMERICAN CROW. The American Crow (Corvus americanws) is one of our bi su known bird characters. Like the blue jay, his reputation is bad; it is as black as his coat. It is very true that if a man once catches a crow in the act of stealing grain, eggs, or young birds, it makes an impression that he does not forget, and he is soon persuaded that the habit is universal, and that the crow indulges in thievery all the time. Even though we have never seen an instance of crow destruction, whenever we see this wily, black individual, we are accustomed to think of him as an enemy. To determine the economic status of the crow, the Department of Agriculture has examined nearly a thousand stomachs of crows killed in every month of the year and all over the country. The bird has been charged with causing injury to the corn crop, stealing fruit, robbing nests of poultry, and eating young birds. On each count, he was proven guilty. It was also shown that most of the corn eaten was waste corn and the part destroyed while growing was only 3 per cent of the total food. The destruction of fruit and eggs was only trivial, while, on the other hand, the amount of harmful insects and mice eaten rendered the final verdict in favor of the crow, for it was proven beyond doubt that he was of more real economic value than harm. Out of 909 crow stomachs that were examined, only forty-one con- tained eggs, feathers, bones, or other remains which could be identified as those of wild birds, and some of these were very likely the remains of dead birds that were found. It is doubtful that more than one crow in twenty ever becomes addicted to this sort of stealing. Even if he has the tendency to steal, it is only occasionally that the chance is offered, for other birds are generally on the watch. No animal food is hunted and eaten more regularly by crows than frogs and toads. Of the 909 stomachs examined, 151 of these contained the remains of frogs and toads. Those also showed that a great percentage of the crow’s food is insectivorous. It is composed of grasshoppers, beetles, cutworms, ants, and various kinds of flies. e Many of the reports of the crow doing damage come from the East, and especially in the spring and winter when the natural food is scarce. Here in Oregon the crows remain with us the entire year, and there is seldom a time when he cannot find abundance of natural food in the woods and fields. Crows are fond of various kinds of fruits and berries, and where they do not get this supply of food in the native woods, they often frequent orchards, and in some cases in fruit-growing sections of our State have been known to do damage. But where they see cultivated fruit, they are generally very sly in stealing. If one or two of the birds of the flock are shot, the rest are very wary about visiting the trees again. The crow undoubtedly destroys eggs and young of other birds, but the real amount of damage he does is often exaggerated. He will eat chicken and turkey eggs where the nests are found out away from the farm houses, but where he has been shot at a few times, he seldom comes very near about the premises. - Mice form one of the most important articles of the crow’s food. The crow’s habit of searching the ground for food enables him to find many [17] mice as he walks along and pokes his nose into bunches of leaves, under grasses and weeds, in the meadows and pastures. Crows are most active in their search during the spring and summer when the hay is cut and when they are likely to find nests of mice that contain young. The crow stomachs that have been taken in July and examined have contained more mice than in any other month. This is a fact that the argricul- turist should credit to the crow's account. Even tame crows are very AMERICAN cRow AT N Esºr partial to mice, for even when they refuse other food, they seldom refuse these. In a case where several young crows were in a cage to- gether, the bird that gets the mouse will swallow it whole to keep the others from getting it, but later it is generally disgorged and torn to pieces. CALIFORNIA PURPLE FINCH. The California Purple Finch (Carpodacus purpureus californicus) or Red-headed Linnet, is a bird that is complained of at times because it destroys the buds when the trees are in blossom. This species is not abundant enough later in the summer to cause much damage to fruit. It is only in the early spring when they come in flocks that complaint is made. The House Finch (Carpodacus mea:icanus frontalis) is a bird that is almost identical and is so common through California. This is [18] the species that is found in some of the valleys through Southern Oregon, where the climate is so like that of California. The male purple and house finch may be recognized by the red color on the head and throat, fading to a more pinkish tint on the back and to a whitish on the breast. The female of both is plain colored, grayish-brown on the back, while the under parts are streaked with brown and white. All have the large finch bill. As to the mischief some orchardists think the purple finch does to fruit blossoms, it is often exaggerated. The birds do eat the buds and blossoms, but experience has shown that they really do very little damage to the fruit crop. At Corvallis one of the faculty of the Agricultural College noticed that a flock of purple finches attacked one particular tree on his grounds. The birds were about the trees for a week and - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hous E FINCH C R RED-HEADED LiNNET were undisturbed. The ground under the tree was covered with blossoms, but the crop of cherries was not by any means destroyed. This is an unusual case, for in an orchard the purple finches seldom, if ever, limit their attacks to one tree. So the amount of harm generally done is scarcely enough to be obvious. The showers of blossoms that fall to the ground are not conclusive proof against the bird. In the end, the budding does little, if any, damage, for the buds are usually superabundant, and whether they are thinned out by birds or man it is frequently beneficial, relieving the trees from excessive bearing and improving the size and quality of the fruit. The linnet is a bird of strong, conical beak that is readily recognized as a seed-eater. During the fruit season, it is not backward in taking its share, and a casual observer would think that fruit was its only article of diet. The examination of stomach contents by Prof. F. E. L. Beal shows conclusively that over 86 per cent of the food of the house finch for the year is weed seed. In his investigations, he examined the stomachs of 1,206 linnets through the fruit-growing sections of California. Of the total number of stomachs examined 1,133, or 94 per cent of all, held weed seeds, while 807, or nearly 67 per cent, contained no other food. There [19] were only 63 stomachs that did not contain weed seeds, while there were 909 that contained no fruit. When we consider that each one of these birds destroys several hundred seeds daily, the bird renders valuable service to agriculture, for the amount of weeds so destroyed is enormous. KING FISHER. Nature has specially adapted the Kingfisher (Ceryle alcyon) for his life work. He seems top-heavy in appearance. Everything is forfeited to furnish him with a big head, a spear-pointed bill, and a pair of strong wings to give this arrow-shaped bird a good start when he dives for fish. I have often watched the kingfisher along the river near my home. He sometimes occupies an old willow along the bank, and he sits there for half an hour at a time, occasionally turning his head and watching the water carefully. I sat on the bank one day as he came rattling down the river and swerving up, caught himself in mid-air and came to a stop fifteen feet above the water. What an eye he must have, to see a fish under the surface when going at such a pace. He fluttered for a moment as a sparrow hawk does above his prey, and dropped arrow-like, com- pletely disappearing beneath the surface. The next instant he was in FAMILY of You NG King Fish ERs the air again with a crawfish. His clothes were water-tight, for the water ran off his satiny plumage as if his coat were thoroughly oiled. Some people advocate shooting the kingfisher at every opportunity, claiming that he destroys too many trout. But along many of our streams he lives on the fish that are of little or no value to man. He catches comparatively few trout and never does he live on these alone. In Oregon his favorite food is crawfish, and he often catches different kinds of insects. Along some streams he lives mostly on frogs, lizards, and beetles. In the Southern States, where the streams are few and run dry in summer, the bird takes to a fare of grasshoppers and mice. The kingfisher is not a social bird, and from an economic standpoint he may not compare well with some of our other birds, but he was here before man came, and should he not have the right to live a secluded life along our water ways? I wouldn’t want a field without a meadow. lark, even if it did raise a good crop of hay. It would be a desolate patch [20] of woods with no chickadee. It would be a barren orchard without a robin or chippy, even if it did bear apples. The river would be robbed of a part of its interest if the kingfisher were not there. To my mind, the river can never be quite the same if the kingfisher does not nest in the bank. WESTERN MEADOWLARK. Those who live anywhere in the country districts about our State need no introduction to the Meadowlark (Sturmella magma neglecta.) It is a bird of the field. It is a songster of the highest type. From an esthetic standpoint, no farm is complete without this bird. Economically it is of the greatest importance in any agricultural community. In Oregon the meadowlark stays in sunshine, rain, and snow, even in the dead of You NG MEADow LARKS IN GRAss N Est [21] winter. He is an early builder, for he often rears a first brood in March or April before other birds have returned. The meadowlark builds its nest on the ground in the middle of or in under a tuft of grass. The nests that I have found have been made in little hollows which the bird has worked out so that the home is com- pletely arched over and covered by grass stems, making a sort of a cave from which the bird has a little beaten path to enter its nest. The meadowlark is a deceptive bird, for she seldom, if ever, lights near her nest. When feeding young, the parent bird will light from fifty to a hundred feet from the nest, and after a careful survey to see that she is not watched, will dodge low and creep through the grasses till she reaches her young. When leaving the nest, she takes the same caution by sneaking off in another direction for some distance before taking wing. The meadowlark is easily recognized by its size, which is about the same as the robin. On the ground, he walks like a crow instead of hopping like a robin. The distinguishing marks in the male are the brilliant yellow of the breast and the crescent of black hung about the neck. The female has duller plumage throughout. A study of the food of the meadowlark shows that it is a bird of great, economic value. Its food is largely composed of weed seeds. When the grain is ripening and being harvested, the meadowlark lives almost en- tirely on grasshoppers, crickets, beetles, and other insects. The bird also destroys large numbers of cutworms, army worms, and chinch bugs. It is often thought that the bird eats considerable wheat and other grains, but a scientific study of its food shows that grain is but a small part of its diet. The grain eaten is largely gleaned from the stubble fields after the harvest is over when the insect food is scarce. In the investigation of the food of the meadowlark, carried on by the Department of Agriculture, 238 stomachs were examined. These were collected in twenty-four different States, representing every month in the year. A summary of stomach contents for the whole year is, insect food 71.7 per cent, vegetable food 26.5 per cent, mineral matter 1.8 per cent. In other words, nearly three-fourths of the meadowlark’s food for the year, including the winter months, consists of insects. During the sum- mer months, when grasshoppers, caterpillars, and other insects are plentiful, the meadowlark lives on these almost entirely. Even in March, when insects are not easily found, they make up 73 per cent of this bird’s food. So it is a wise provision in our Oregon laws that makes it a crime to kill this bird or destroy its nest. SPARROW HAWK. The Sparrow Hawk (Falco sparverius deserticola) is a bird whose name is against him. He should have been named the grasshopper hawk, which would have been more appropriate in every way, for he seldom touches a sparrow, while he lives to a large extent on grasshoppers. He is the smallest in our family of hawks, and is also the most beautifully marked, as well as a most beneficial bird. He may be recognized by the general color of bright red-brown on the back and the lighter brownish breast with black spots. The top of the head is slate-colored, with two black stripes on the cheeks. This hawk may often be recognized as it perches on the top of some pole, or as it flies out over the field and on fluttering wing poises in mid-air, looking for its food. The nest of this bird is built in a hole in a tree, the same as the woodpecker, [22] Dr. A. K. Fisher of the Biological Survey has made a careful study of the food habits of this hawk. Stomachs of 320 sparrow hawks were examined, and only one of them contained the remains of a game bird. spa RRow H.Aw K It also contained twenty-nine insects. He proved that the bird is almost exclusively insectivorous, except when insect food is difficult to obtain. In many localities in the West where grasshoppers and crickets are abundant, these hawks will congregate, and rarely do they touch other kinds of food as long as the grasshopper crop lasts. [23] Among most people in the country, there is a deep-seated feeling against all hawks. They have seen a hawk Swoop down and carry off a chicken, and the conclusion is that all hawks steal chickens and do nothing except fly about and wait for the chance. The farmer, who has seen his chickens go sailing off in the clutches of a hawk, it is mighty hard to persuade that a hawk is good for anything except a profes- sional chicken thief. And under the circumstances, he can’t be blamed, for hawks are not easy to get acquainted with and it takes an expert to tell the different kinds. Notwithstanding these facts, it is well to understand something of the real economic value of hawks, for they are not all given to stealing chickens. Years ago, when the farmers of Pennsylvania saw hawks catching their chickens, they concluded that all hawks and owls were dangerous to their poultry yards. As a result, a law was passed offering bounties for the bodies of these two species of birds. Before long, the Department of Agriculture at Washington began to receive letters from farmers of Pennsylvania complaining that field mice were destroying their crops to an unusual extent. A study of the problem soon revealed the fact that the destruction of the birds of prey had destroyed the natural check upon these harmful rodents. In interfering with Nature's balance to this extent, the farmers lost several million dollars’ worth of grain. The hawks and owls are Nature's check against the great army of harmful rodents that inhabit our fields and gardens. The hawks hunt by day and keep the small diurnal animals in check, and the owls are especially equipped to supplement the work of the hawks. Their eyesight is keenest during the early hours of the night and morning when moles, gophers, and mice are more active. SCREECH OWL. The Screech Owl (Megascops asio kemmicottii), like the sparrow hawk, is largely an insect-eating bird. It is common all through the western part of our State, where it makes its home in some hollow tree in a patch of woods nearest a farm house. In the day time it is sometimes seen Snuggled up on the limb of a thick tree, close against the trunk, where its mottled color matches well with its surroundings. It is some- times called the Mottled Owl, or the Little Horned Owl, because of its small size and its ear-tufts, which it generally holds erect. Superstitious people think the owl is a bird of bad omen, but to one who loves bird life, the wierd whistle of the screech owl among the trees or about the garden on a still summer or fall evening, has a peculiar fascination. We may well marvel at his wonderful sense of sight and hearing, for as he floats shadow-silently over the garden, he hears even the foot-step of a mouse or sees the slightest movement of a gopher and swoops to catch his prey with steel-trap claws. It is comparatively easy to determine the exact economic status of the hawks and owls by an examination of the pellets found about their homes or roosting places. These birds often swallow the smaller rodents entire, or tear them apart, swallowing the fragments. As soon as the nutritious portions of the food are absorbed, the other portions, such as hair, feathers, and bones, are rolled into a ball by the action of the muscles of the stomach. These are vomited up, and are known as pellets, and by examining these, scientists can tell exactly what kind ol food has been eaten. Through many of the Middle Western States, where the interests are largely agricultural, the Rocky Mountain locust is at times very destruc- tive to crops. In the first annual report of the United States Entomo- logical Commission, there are figures showing that in the four States of Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri the loss to crops by locusts was 142,942,800 bushels, which with a money value of 28 cents per bushel, would mean a loss of $40,000,000. An examination of the stomach con- [24] tents of eight screech owls taken at that time in Nebraska showed that they had eaten just before they were killed 219 locusts and 247 other insects, besides two mice. In speaking of the value of owls, Mr. George C. Jones says: “I think the smaller species of owls feed upon the cutworm to some extent. I have found cutworms in the stomach of the common screech owl. The fact that both the cutworms and the owls are nocturnal leads me to believe that the owls, of all the birds, are the most efficient exterminators of this formidable pest and should on this account receive protection.” In one locality, almost every tree of a five-acre peach orchard was screech ow-L LEAving NEs.T. girdled by mice and rabbits during the winter. It would have paid the owner of the orchard to have had owls and hawks about the locality, even though a chicken might have been stolen occasionally. In many places where our young fruit trees are alive and in good condition, we do not realize that it may be due to the hawks and owls, for we often credit them with more harm than benefit. Here in Oregon, the mice, gophers. moles, and rabbits stay with us summer and winter, and so do the hawks and owls. sa LEM, OREGON wi LLIS S. DUN. Iw A. Y. STATE PRINTER 19 Oe