TEMPERANCE SERMONS DELIVERED IN RESPONSE TO AN INVITATION THE NATIONAL TEMPERANCE SOCIETY PUBLICA TION HO USE. NEW YORK: * -The National Temperance Society and Publication House, No. 58 READE STREET. 1873. .,.;. I OF AND Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1873, by J. N. STEARNS, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C. JOHN ROSS & Co., PRINTERS, 27 ROSE STREET, NEW YORK. * I . o v CONTENTS. COMMON SENSE FOR YOUNG MEN,... By Rev. HENRY WARD BEECHER, Plymouth Church, Brooklyn. II. MORAL DUTY OF TOTAL ABSTINENCE........ By Rev. T. L. CUYLER, D.D., Lafayette Avenue Church., Brooklyn. III. THE EVIL BEAST,............ By Rev. T. DE WITT TALMAGE, D.D., Brooklyn Tabernacle. IV. THE GOOD SAMARITAN,.......... By Rev. J. B. DUNN, Beach Street Presbyterian Church, Boston. V. SELF-DENIAL: A DUTY AND A PLEASURE,... By Rev. J. P. NEw.IAN, D.D., Chaplain of the United States Senate. VI. TIlE CHURCH AND TEMPERANCE,..... By Rev. JOHN W. MEARS, D.D., Professor at Hamilton College, New York. VII. ACTIVE PITY OF A QUEEN,......... By Rev. JOHN HALL, D.D., Nineteenth Presbyterian Church, Fifth Avenue, New York. VIII. TEMPERANCE AND THE PULPIT,..... By Rev. C. D. Foss, D.D., St. Paul's M. E. Church, Fourth Avenue, New York. -' r O/ A?, 1. PAGE. 9 35 57 73 101 121 I47 i6g Conteints. THE EVILS OF INTEMPERANCE,........ By Rev. J. Ro.iEY~N BERRY, D.D., Mont Clair, New Jersey. x. LIBERTY AND LOVE,........... By Rev. HENRY WARD BEECHiER, Plymouth Church, Broollyn. XI. THE WINE AND THE WORD,.......... By Rev. HERRICK JOHNSON, D.D., First Presbyterian Church, Philadelphia. XII. STRANGE CHILDREN,............ By Rev. PETER STRYKER, D.D., First Presbyterian Church, Rome, N.Y. I XIII. THE IMPEACHMENT AND PUNISHMENT OF ALCOHOL,. By Rev. C. H. FOWLER, Centenary M. E. Church, Chicago, 111. XIV. DRINKING FOR HEALTH,..'.... By Rev. H. C. FISH, D.D., First Baptist Church, Newark, N. J XV. SCIENTIFIC CERTAINTIES (NOT OPINIONS) ABOUT ALCOHOL, Containing Dr. Sewall's stomach plates. By Rev. H. W. Warren, I D.D.,Church Street M. E. Church, Philadelphia. XVI. MIv NAM.E IS LEGION............. 35I By Rev. S. H. TYNG, D.D., St. George's (Episcopal) Church, New York. XVII. TIiE C'RISTIAN SERVING HIS GENERATION, -... By Rev. WM. MS. TAYLOR, D.D., Broadway Tabernacle (Con gregational), New York. ix. PAGE. igr 2I3 227 249 269 297 329 377 COMMON SENSE FOR YOUNG MEN ON THR SUBJECT OF TEMPERANCE. "There is a way which seemeth right unto a man; but the ends t~rc~f Itre the ways of death."-Paov. XiV. 12. HIS is peculiarly applicable to those who are young, who are going, as it were, along unknown paths, and who see, branching out to the right or to the left, roads planted with flowers, overhung with vines, and full of tempting sights and beckoning pleasures, all of which look to them secure and most joyful. But these roads, once entered upon, are difficult to leave; and the sights that tempted them, and the pleasures that beckoned them, are gradually exchanged for harder and harder fates. The smooth road soon becomes precipitous, the easy and apparently safe course soon becomes full of peril, and at last they are plunged into remediless destruction. This is the career of thousands. They enter upon ways which are enticing, which are covered with beauty, which promise great remuneration. Io Common Sense for Young Affen which fulfil only in part the things promised, anc which, having deluded them, at last destroy theim. There are a great many such ways, but there is only one of them which I propose to speak upon, to-night, and that is the way of the drinker. It is a part of every Christian minister's duty to keep his congregation instructed on the subject of temperance from the Christian point of view. It is especially my duty, because this church has, from its very foundation, reckoned the cause of temperance as a part of the great Christian movement of the world. It is my duty, because in many ways a generation has come up in our midst without that special and sedulous training which we had in our youth. Those who are at about my time of life remember the beginning of this education, and how strong and various were the influences and impulses and instruments by which the attention of the community was aroused. There was, first, novelty; and then, at last, fashion and public sentiment concurred. This movement has run through one generation, and also has run through a kind of moral period, and a reaction has come on, and a generation of young persons have arisen who are less informed, perhaps, on this subject, than those who immediately preceded them. It becomes important, therefore, that churches and ministers should renew the instruction of the young on the dangers of drinking. I do not propose to go into a denunciatory tirade against liquor dealers, or against dram-shops, or against the drinking usages of society. I propose, on the Subject of Temperance. to-night, to speak to the young men of my charge, and to the community, in so far as my words may be borne out to them; and I propose to speak as an elder brother, and to address this subject, with all moderation, and yet with all earnestness, to their best judgment. I do not propose to carry you away by exciting your feelings; but I propose, if possible, to convince you through your reasoning faculties. And I ask you to consider the subject of entire abstinence from all that intoxicates, from motives which bear upon your personal welfare, from motives which bear upon the welfare of the society in which you live, and from motives which spring from religion itself. And I remark, I. A healthy nature never craves intoxicating drinks. Men are not drawn to the use of intoxicating drinks as they are drawn to the use of food, or ordinary drinks. I suppose that ninety-nine in a hundred of the men that drink, learned, and had to learn, to love intoxicating beverages; and I suppose that those who indulge in them most, and most ruinously, have to do it with a testimony that they are not palatable. You are not, therefore, called to follow any great instinct in drinking. The sin of indulging in intoxl. cating drinks is not like a passional sin; it is not like obedience to some master-passion that lies within demanding gratification. There is no such excuse for men who drink as that of natural huncer or thirst. MAlen may be naturally hungry or thirsty, but men are not by nature thirsty for wine, nor for whiskey, nor for brandy, nor for any I! 12 Common Senzse for Younzg Men other compound; so that in drinking there is no obedience on the part of men to any radical instinct or radical impulse. Hence, the use of intoxicating drinks is not necessary. It is not prompted by anything that is natural in yourself. If you say: "Yes, I have a natural craving for it," then to you I say: That is the very reason why you should not take it. If you have no craving for it, why should you cumber yourself with it? And if you have such a craving, surely, if you are wise, you will not put yourself in peril by indulging it. If you have the appetite in you, then by all means, unless you are utterly reckless in regard to your own welfare, you will take warning, and shun the danger which threatens you. 2. Alcoholic stimulants are not needful. Not only does a desire for them not spring from any constitutional impulse or necessity, but experience has shown that they are not needful as elements of diet. I do not undertake to say that they have no place medicinally. I express a well-matured judgment when I say that I think they have been employed medicinally in a manner that is very rash, and that is not scientific; but I do not propose to interfere with the doctors' sphere, except to express the wish that they might study the moral interests of their patients as much as they do their physical well-being, and as little as possible put men under temptation by prescriptions which require the continuous use of alcoholic stimulants. That they are to be excluded wholly on tlie Szibjcci of Teizperance. from the range of medicine, I do not undertake to say; that I would not employ them under medical prescription, I do not undertake to say; but I do undertake to say that, except as medicine, they are not necessary. They are not needful for health, and they are not needful for strength. They are not a part of a man's normal diet. You are not, therefore, required to indulge in them for the same reason that you are required to indulge in meat, or in bread, or in milk, or in water. 3. Alcoholic stimulants are not usually palatable. Young men who drink seldom love at first what they drink. They serve an apprenticeship to a bad habit. I have alluded to this already; but there is in it a still further point to be developed. There are many things that men do which they do not like to do, and for which they have no natural appetite; but then, they gain something by doing them that is worth the toil required to overcome the barriers that surround them. Very few there are who like the methodical industry which is required to master a trade. So young men are obliged to do what they do not want to do, and are kept from doing what they want to do. The result is that, at the end of five or seven years of apprenticeship, they have learned what is equivalent to the labor which they have performed during those years. The young man who studies a profession, studies against his wsill a great deal of the time; or rather, he obliges himself by his will to study for the sake oi that which hle will gain by study. I 3 J4 Conmmioni Sense for Younzg Mfen And so we are continually, in one sense, going against nature; that is, we are continually going against the lower nature for the sake of the higher. There is an upper or spirit nature, and there is a lower or flesh nature; and the upper demands the denial of the lower. When, therefore, men study long for a professional life, or practise long with the hand for an artist or artisan life, they go against their natural tendency. And they gain something that is worth all the self-denial and all the painstaking to which they subject themselves. But when men learn to love drink, for which they have no natural appetite, what do they get in return, but habits that are fraught with danger? They gain no equivalent for what they give. They force nature, and force natlure for the purpose of bringing themselves into a condition in which their whole life will be full of peril. 4. Drinking habits are not economical. And economy, though it is a very homely virtue, and is not reckoned among moral virtues, and is spoken of as a commercial virtue, hais a most important relation to a young man's prosperity, regarded not only commercially, but morally. I need not speak of it as a matter of co)mmerce. Great moderation in the expenditure of moneygreat frugality in the early part of a man's life-is a part of that education which every man is ex pected to gain who means to acquire a fortune, and become a responsible and influential mr) ini the community. Now, the administration of one's wealt.h, oi of oa n7:e ozf.,jcci f Tczlcrai-,ce. one's affaiirs, in a close, careful, and successftil way, is morally beneficial, inasmuch as it means self-denial, forethought, arrangement, with a purpose, followed by a definite action of the will. All these things are self-governing elements. Self-government may begin with pecuniary matters, as well as with other affairs. And thousands of men take their first step in moral life through the drill which economy requires. And no young man, whatever his situation in life may be, has a right to despise economy, or has a right to be careless or profuse in the expenditure of his means. No matter if a man's hands are in mines of wealth, he has no right to make a wasteful use of that wealth. No man has a right to go from youth to manhood without having formed rigid habits of economy. If you are poor, then the way out of poverty into wealth is through economy; if you are rich, then you should administer your riches so that your example shall be a blessing and not a curse to the community. You are God's steward, and you have no right to recklessly spend money that you did not earn-though young men seem mostly to think that they. have a right to scatter all the money that they can lay their hands on! The majority of young men, when they enter upon life, have but little at the beginning. MAlore than half-yes, more than two-thirds, probablyof the young men who come to New York to seek their fortune, come with a very slender pittance. They are obliged to live upon a very small inr. I 5 i6 Co;i;zolz Sense for Yoeuo Jfen come. And it ought to be a matter of pride with every young man to be able to live on his income, however small it may be, and inside of it. It is not necessary that you should live here as you lived at home. It might be more agreeable, but it is not necessary. There is something higher than living at a first-class boarding-house, or at a hotel. There is something better than having a luxurious table. It is not necessary that a young man should go to a boarding-house at all. If your means will not allow it, it is not necessary that you should go any higher than to buy your loaf and eat it in your own room. "But," you will reply, " what sort of a life is that, where a young man works all day, and then goes like a dog to his kennel at night, and gnaws his loaf, and drinks his cold water, and creeps under his straw, and gets up in the morning, and gnaws his loaf again, and then drags himself out to work once more?" I think there should be provision made for a more respectable method of cheap living; and yet, until that provision is made, even such a life, voluntarily assumed, is nobler than for a young man to live at a higher rate, and steal the difference between his salary and his expenses, as you are not ashamed to do, often! It is better for a young man to feel so proud that he will not go one penny beyond what he lawfully owns. And even if a young man is wealthy, it is noble for him to live on a moderate allowance. But when young men come to the city, and have but a small pittance of salary to live on, how often on lie Subjecl of Tempera;nce. do they split up and divide that pittance, and waste a large portion of it on tobacco and drink! I shall not now enter upon a crusade against the use of tobacco, though I think it is entirely needless. The most self-indulgent and the most selfish of luxuries is that of tobacco. I never knew a dozen men that used tobacco that cared anything about whether they smelled agreeable to other people, or whether they carried them selves so that other people were happy, or not. They will foul the house, they will foul the boat, they will foul the car, if they are not arbitrarily restrained. They forget father and mother, and wife and children, and all others, and go through life smoking, stenchful and disagreeable; and when they are expostulated with, they laugh! The use of tobacco does not make a man a monster: it only makes him selfish in respect to the comfort of people round about him. Though 1 consider this to be a most disagreeable and selfish habit, I do not look upon it as being at all equal to drinking in its evil effects; but it is a very wasteful habit. There are few young men that are beginning life who can afford to smoke. And, much more, there are few young men that can afford to drink when they are beginning life, for, if you drink cheaply, you drink meanly. If you drink wholesomely, you drink dearly. Drinking involves an expense that very few at the beginning of life can afford to incur. Drinking habits take hold indirectly upon the whole framework of a man's prosperity They I7 i Commnon Sense for Youzng.Men lead to very many expenses besides the daily ex. pense of the cup. They bring one into society, and introduce him to customs which are constantly a levy and a tax upon him. They place him in a position where he is subjected to a great many expenditures which, under other circumstances, he might avoid. For they who come together for drinking purposes are seldom persons who are careful to engineer their way, little by little, and step by step, up to a strong and safe manhood. Out of the circle where drinking is carried on for purposes of pleasure there open, day by day, hundreds of doors that never open without a fee; and a young man who forms the habit of drinking takes on an expense that wastes his patrimony, and will continually keep him down. This may not be the case with all, and it will be the case with some more than with others; but I think that, with the majority, reasons of economy should be sufficient to dissuade them from formng drinking habits. 5. Drinking habits open the door to many temptations which no man has a right to encounter. Vices come with drinking habits. Young men who are susceptible, wide-awake, and unformed in their habits, are inclined to smoke a little, and drink a little, and gamble a little, and "see life" a little; and this group of little vices are very apt to invite the company of larger vices. Drinking habits throw young men into associations, and under cricumstances, whe,re it is far more likely on the Subject of Temrperance. that their lower nature will be solicited than that their higher moral nature will be solicited. We see in the poets much about the cup-much about its generosity. Many glorious things are said and sung about "the wine in the cup;" and yet, after all, it is the beast that drinks the cup. In nine hundred and ninety-nine cases in a thou sand, it feeds the lower nature wholly, and not the higher nature at all. Now, there are many that are-frail in the hour of temptation, and that must needs utter that peti tion of the Lord's Prayer, "Lead us not into temptation "-as if we should go down if we came into its presence, as we should, many of us. The majority of us are so weak that we have no right to bring ourselves into temptation by forming habits of drinking. 6. There cannot be a doubt as to the fact that habits of drinking withdraw from a young man the confidence of those who watch and gauge young men. Young men who are preparing themselves for life, by drinking lose the confidence of those who desire to employ respectable and trustworthy men. The knowledge that a young man drinks, destroys his reputation for trustworthiness. I do not say that that is the case in every country. If a man is born under a vine in Italy, and is accustomed, from his youth up, to participation in the wine-cup, I do not say that he will not be considered trustworthy. We are very much creatures of the institutions and habits of the country I9 20 Cornmzolz Sense for Young _ffen where we are; but in this country, where Lou are, ald where I am speaking to you, it is not the habit of the population to indulge in the use of wine or strong drink, and it is so far opposed to an intelligent, correct public sentiment among us, that it unquestionably leaves a mark upon a young man who indulges in it. If you were looking out for a confidential clerk, and two young men presented themselves, in al respects equal, except that one of them was ac customed to indulge gently in drinking, and the other was not at all accustomed to it, you would not hesitate in your choice. Even if you did not scruple at putting wine on your own table, you would take the young man that was temperate. Many a man who is vicious, wants his wife to be pure; and many a man who drinks, will not allow his clerks to drink. And if young men are addicted to even a mild indulgence in drinking habits, it is prejudicial to their good name and to their chances of success. This is a habit which is not required by any natural impulse, which is not necessary to your health, which is full of perils, which exposes you to various temptations, and which throws a shadow over the threshold of your business life. And why should you voluntarily form such a habit, or place yourself in such a position that you will almost inevitably fall into it? What reason is there for your entering upon such a course? 7. Drinking may either develop a tendency which lies dormant in you, or it may create a on lize Suzbjec of Teszperance. tendency which does not already exist in yout system. As a matter of fact, it is certain that there are many persons who inherit such an ab normal condition of the nervous system that, on suitable provocation, there spring up in them pa roxysms which are almost as ungovernable as are convulsions or the paroxysms of neuralgia. There is such a thing as a latent tendency of the consti tution that will slumber all one's life, if it be let alone, if those things which excite it be rigidly withheld, but that, if it be once roused up, will assert itself with a force that is well-nigh omnipo tent. And there is many a man who, by taking alcoholic stimulants early in life, arouses that hereditary tendency in himself; aid, once being aroused, tiger-like, it destroys its victim. And thus thousands are destroyed irremedilessly. But if there is no such tendenrcy in you; if your father, and his father, and his father, or if your ancestors on both sides, h?.Te sent down to you a constitution unimpaired, it may nevertheless be the fact that, from other causes, there is a condition of your system whi(h predisposes you to that tendency which, if creat( d in you,-you will transmit to your posterity. And I cannot think of a cruelty greater than that which shall lead a parent, from reasons of mere self-indulgence, to roll down on his posterity, to many generations, a tendency which shall be one long and terrible curse to them, And yet there are multitudes that are doing it. Whoever consumes his own nervous system by excessive indulgence in any manner, prepares the 21 22 Common Sense for Young Jfen way for those who come after him to be blighted in their whole nervous constitution. And if, in the use of intoxicating drinks, you drive up your jaded faculties; if you, for the sake of fulfilling tasks that are beyond your power, resort to unnatural stimulation, you prepare yourself to hand down to your posterity the blight of intemperance, if ever they shall touch the intoxicating bow l. 8. No man has a right, under all the conditions that I have mentioned, to put himself in peril by either or all of these mischiefs. No man has a right to buy a ticket in this lottery of death. If a lottery should be started, if the wheel should be opened, and if you knew that there was one in each hundred of the tickets that would bring death and destruction to the person who should draw it, you would not have anything to do with that lottery. You never would run the risk of losing your life, where the chances of death were one to a hundred, even if one of the tickets was marked ten thousand dollars, another two thousand, and another one thousand. Who would patronize such a lottery? Who would not say that a man who did it courted death? But here is a lottery in which the death-bearing tickets are more than one in every hundred. And what earthly reason is there that should induce a man to put in a venture where the risk is so great? What great good ig there that he can hope to gain? There is none. What great happiness is there that he can reasonably expect to obtain? There is none. on the Szubject of Temnperance. What customs impose on him the necessity of thus placing himself in jeopardy? None that are not better broken than observed. What inward need impels him to it? None. Thus far, I have argued this question on the lower grounds of expediency. I present, now, higher motives for the young to live a temperate life. I. Every man is bound to present himself to his age and country as noble a specimen of manhood as is possible to him. Every man is bound so to develop every part of his nature-his physical vigor, his intellectual strength, his moral powersthat when he presents himself to his country he shall be worth that country's accepting. It was the custom among the Greeks, when a man had done well, when he had made great achievements, to have a statue of him in some temple of the gods; and their temples became museums, filled with statues of those benefactors of the state, who were able to buy statues of themselves, which had been voted a place there. These statues were ranged in long successions about the temples. And every man is bound to case himself, not in marble, but in flesh and blood, in mental powers, and in the higher attributes of the soul, and present himself, a living man, to the state, that he may be, not a mere lifeless simuizacr?z(n, but a man of life and vigor, and an instrument of good, in the age to which he belongs. I love to see young men with a noble carriage, and with bloc ming health. I cannot bear to see 23 24 Coimzioit Senzse fo Yo7lotg AMen young men, that have every reason for building up a noble manhood, walking with a discolored face and an unwholesome skin, which are signs of intemperance. Perhaps there is nothing more disreputable than for a young man to present himself a miserable wreck of what he might have been, and a burden, to the state and to the age in which he lives; and perhaps there is nothing more creditable to a young man than to present himself to the state and to the age in which he lives a monument of health and vigor and true manliness. Temperance brings you to this higher and nobler condition of manhood, and intemperance takes you from it. 2. No man has a right to sport with all the interests that are centred in a moral being, and to put himself in peril for such reasons as mostly induce young men to drink. As I have said, there is no natural appetite in you for intoxicating beverages. There is nothing in your normal condition which leads you to want them. There is a curiosity that many young persons feel in regard to them. I remember that, from what I had read in the Bible and other books about wine, I had the impression that if [ tasted it I should be lifted up to the seventh heaven, and I had a great curiosity to know how wine tasted. And finally I did taste it. But I was not lifted up by it as I expected 1 should be. And since this curiosity exists, I cannot say that if my child had heard of champagne, and wanted to taste it, I never would let him taste it. I think it very likely that if I did not he would on /ie Sibijct of Temperance. gratify that curiosity, that abnormal desire, by stealth; and it seems to me that if he is going to know what it is, the knowledge had better be conveyed to him by parental revelation and teachin, mostly. And a child that has had one taste of it, usually wants no more. And when young men have once tasted wine, and satisfied their curiosity about it, why should they continue taking it? Though they do not like it, they are ashamed among their companions not to hold up their heads, and toss off a drink, just like any other man. They are ashamed to be deficient in so manly an accomplishment! They are ashamed to stand up and say, " I do not relish it; I do not need it, and I will not have it." They cannot bear the ridicule which such a declaration would subject them to. They are ashamed to have it thought that they cannot afford to have what rich and fashionable people have; and yet they cannot, and it is a lie for them to pretend that they can. You drink because great men around you drink. The head of that firm up there drinks, and so you poverty-stricken clerk down there drink. And you are going to drink what fashionable people do-you, that have not a rag of fashion, an(l willy not have for years to come. And you will do it knowing that it is beyond your means, that it is contrary to good health, and inconsistent with manliness. For miserable, unmanly reasons of pride and vanity, you drink. You do not dare, going out at one o'clock at night, with half a dozen young fellows that have "the flesh of 25 26 Common Sense for Souing lren health" on their faces, when they ask you to step in and take some "bitters " with them, to refuse. You do not dare to meet their taunts and gibes, You do not dare, when you hesitate and draw back, and they say, " Wrhat! afraid? You are probably one of the virtuous young men that came from the country," to say, "Yes, I am; and I intend to remain so a good while." How many men are there that, in a matter vital to their virtue, vital to their good habits, and vital to their manliness, flinch, and go down before their companions, and drink what they do not like, and what they know is damaging to them, putting everything in peril, because they have not the manliness to say " No "! You go to a wedding, and the fair hands of the entertaining company present the cup to you; and you say, "Of course, I must drink here." Oh! that it were only just here; but there are so many just heres! Soon after comes the convivial entertainment; and the same hands again present you with the cup; and you drink again. Temptations follow at frequent intervals, and on each succeeding occasion you yield more easily than at the previous one. It does not make you a drunkard, but it weakens your power of standing on your conscience and manly independence, and saying, "Such things I disallow, and will not do." It is the beginning of that inclined plane down which you are preparing to slide. It is one of those ways which are pleasant, and which seem to be safe, but the ends of which are death. To stand in the blooming presence of beauty, and to be smiled on the Subject of Temzfperance. upon, especially if the persons that smile upon you are a little higher in society than you are, they standing on five thousand, while you stand onI five hundred, is very flattering to your vanity. And if, having invited you, they offer you wine, and say, "You certainly will take it from me," you cannot refuse. You think," If I am admitted into that family, my prospects will be bright; my for tune will be made." What a casuist the devil is when he wants to get people in his power! How delicate he is! How he makes the road to sin smooth and delightful! So, under such beguiling influences, young men take the cup, and drink, and drink again, and drink many times. And many, under such circumstan ces, are ashamed of themselves; they rebuke themselves; they go home with an unquiet con science; they feel humbled; and yet, they repeat the same round of dissipation again and again. And I put it to any man who has any self-respect, whether he ought to be cajoled or dragooned into using what he does not like, what does not like him, what exposes him to all possible perils, what is unfitted to his circumstances, and what is subversive of all his thoughts of manhood? I am ashamed of a young man who cannot resist the temptation to drink; or, rather, I am sorry for him. I think very likely that I should feel embarrassed, and blush, and submit, as you do. But it is no less a peril; and I warn every young man not to allow the customs of society to seduce him from a sober and matured pur 27 28 CComm;on Sense for Young Men pose, to stand utterly clean and clear of this mischief. 3. This is the great social battle of the age which we are fighting between the flesh and the spiritbetween the animal and the man. We are living in a time when nothing can save us but moral principle in the individual. Our government is an equal government, as such. We have cast in our destiny on this great principle of popular government, and we must go up with it, or go down with it. It is for us to maintain our institutions, if they are maintained at all; and unless we can teach individuals and the masses selfrespect and self-control, we are utterly ruined. It is a mere matter of time. There is no salvation for institutions like ours except in the principle of self-control. And there is no single evil, social or political, that strikes more at the foundation of such institutions than the drinking habits of society. If you corrupt the working-class by drink; if you corrupt the great middle-class by drink; if you corrupt the literary and wealthy classes by drink, you have destroyed the commonwealth beyond your power to save it. And we are making battle for the preservation of this moral principle. It is the great patriotic movement of the day. Therefore, we must have clear heads; we must have right consciences; we must have all the manhlood that is in men, or that can educate them to it. The good that is in society will not be a match for the evil that is continually pulling it down. Now, young men, which side are you to take in on 1/e SutbjecI of Temperance. this gi eat struggle? Will you go for license? \Vill y-,u go for passion? Will you go for corruption? (':- will you range yourselves on the side of those who are attempting to lift men up toward spirituality; toward true reason; toward noble self-control? You can afford to go but one way. Every young man who has one impulse of heroism, one generous tendency in him, ought in the beginning to take his ground beyond all controversy, and say, "I work for those who work for the good and beautiful and true." 4. You have no right to allow your example to seduce the weak. I have spoken of the effects of drinking habits on yourselves. Now comes an auxiliary consideration. Even if you are not yourselves personally injured by drinking, your exam)le injures others. I am aware that men oftentimes revolt from the application of this thought in regard to example, sayiing, "M an is independent. I am not bound to conform to the vulgar opinions of ignorant men. I am not bound to take the pattern of my development from the undeveloped and uneducated below me. They must come to me. I shall not go to them." A man has a right to shock public opinion whenever he is endeavoring to bring in a hilgher morality; whenever there is a greater degree of refinement after which he is seeking; whenever custom is to be set aside, and a iew and better state of things instituted. He is a moral coward who fears to do it under such ci. 29 30 Cnrmnon Sense for Youing Afett cumstances. But you have no right to be content with simple conformity to custom, and to be indifferent to the effect of your example on those beneath you. There are many persons who are apt to consider themselves exempt from this duty of taking care that their example shall not be a stumbling-block, but a safe guide, to others. Those who are influential by reason of wealth, or position, or culture, are wont to throw off the responsibility of their example; but none mrnore than they should watch their example with a coInscientious regard for any who may be affected by it. In proportion as God has made you strong, either in your mental attainments or in your outward circumstances, he lays on you the responsibility of the example which you set for those who are not so fortunate as you are. A man cannot help being influenced by the example of those who occupy elevated positions in society. A man will inevitably be affected by the example of those who are high in station. If a man is rich, and lives in splendor, his example will surely influence those by whom he is surrounded. And it is the duty of all that are endowed with the power of benefiting or injuring others by their example, to see that that example is beneficial, and not injurious. Those who are at the top of society are largely responsible for the ideas of those who are at the bottom. And if God has advanced you among men, it is not to give you more license, but to make you more careful of your example before others. No man has a on Ifie Subec.c of Temierance. right to let his example work mischief upon thlosc in the mic?st' of whotn he moves. And the unfeeling indifference of men (and more, perhaps, in this matter of drinking than in any other) as to the welfare of their neighbors, shows that their hearts have become seared by prosperity, and degraded by the things which should, in the providence of God, have made them more tender and considerate. 5. No man has a right to be neutral in the great work of temperance, in this age, and in this country. Every man, from considerations of personal safety, from moral considerations, from considerations of his relations to his fellow-men in social life, and from considerations of patriotism or of state, ought to take sides in this matter, and let his position be known of all men. It is too notorious to require any proof, that, to a very great extent, especially in the cities, our legislation begins in the grog-shop. Tile seed of judges is planted there. Our administrations spring out of the ooze and mud of drinking holes. Our na tional councils are begun there. The machinery of government is arranged there. There is no part of the community so active as that which lives in the indulgence of the animal appetites; and there is no part of the community which should be watched over with such sleepless vigilance by those who, by sound morality and superior judgment, are fitted to wisely administer the affairs of the nation. And the time has come wheni all good men, who have so long staid at 3 1 32 Commont Sense for Young Iklen home, and left the management of political affai.rs, in the hands of dissipated and unscihpulous meri. should come together, and take the side of purity and temperance. WVe must produce a radical change in the public sentiment of the country on this vital question, or we shall be destroyed by the overwhelming deluge of the drinking habits of society. Now, I have purposely avoided exaggerations in the discussion of this subject to-night. I have avoided the presentation of extravagant views. 1 have attempted to address myself to your reason. And, in closing, I desire to ask you two questions: First: Have I not presented considerations sufficient to make it every man's duty to think about this subject? If you have indulged yNcrself hitherto thoughtlessly and carelessly in drinking nabits, is it not your duty Lto consider seriously whether it is not best for you to become a total abstainer from everything that is intoxicating? If your example in this matter has been such as to lead others into temptation, ought you not to consider the propriety of reviewing your course, and so rectifying it that it shall be a blessing, and not a curse, to your fellow-men? The second question which I desire to ask, is, whether it is not your duty to decide this question on strictly moral grounds? I do not say to men, "You shall never drink wine or ardent spirits." I say to them," Ought you not to make a decision on this subject? And ought you not to r,.ake that decision on mnorai grounds? ls not on Ilie Subject of Temzpcra'ice. this a matter that you ought to consider, not only in the light of your own personal welfare, but also in the light of your relations to individuals with whom you come in contact, to the community in which you live, and to the nation to which you belong?" I can well understand how a man may, on his death-bed, look back upon his career in life, and say, "I am sorry that I ever touched the cup;" but I cannot understand how any man can, on his death-bed, look back and say, " I am sorry that I have always been abstemious of the cup." There is one way that you know is safe, and honorable, and proper as regards others; but the other way, even if it is possible for it to be safe, is one in which there are a hundred chances to one that, directly or indirectly, it will be mischievous-if not to you, to others. Can you form a decision on such a subject as this, and not take into consideration these great verities? And are you that are safe justified in taking the first steps in a course which is so full of peril? How much wiser and better it will be for 'Iou, whose lips are still clean, to go through life with them undefiled! Do this, and you will have reason all through your life to thank God that in your early days you were induced to take a stand of strict, invariable temperance. Temperance will do you no harm. In a thousand ways, it will do you good. Even occasional drinking will do you no good; and entire abstinence from drinking will do you no harm. 33 3, Comzmzon Sen)se for Youztg,fen. Tare the right side; the manly side; the patri otic side. God help you and keep you. And by-and-by, may there conie from the lips of many a man who hears me to-night this testimony: "I thank God that I heard that sermon by MAr. Beecher on that Sunday night. It saved me. It made me live a bettier life all the waythrough." THE MORAL DUTY OF TOTAL ABSTINENCE. "Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging: and whosoever is deceived hereby is not wise."-PROVERBS xx. I. I PROPOSE to discuss the very important question, What is the duty of every Christian in reference to the use of intoxicating drinks? No question is, at the present moment, agitating more minds than this one. None has a better rilght to enter the pulpit on the Sabbath; to no other moral question can a minister of Jesus Christ be more imperatively required to return a candid, careful, and most unmistakable answer. In every domain of practical Christian morals, the pulpit ought to make the path of duty so clear that " the wayfaring men, though fools, shall not err therein." A minister should carry no darklanterns. During the past week, I have found my mind disturbed afresh, and deeply, too, by the state of thiings around us. To the outward eye, the business and the social life of this city have gone on as aforetimes. But the eye of God, looking into the interior moral life of this community, has seen 36 God's Law owt lie Body anzd strange and sorrowvful things. He has seen struggles with terrible temptation that you have little dreamed of. He has seen several thousands of people strongly tempted to do that which inclination or custom prompted them to do, and yet the very doing of it might be fatal to the body and damning to the soul. He has seen some young man stretching forth his hand, with anxious misgiving, for his first glass of strong drink; and some aged hands reached out to clutch the glass, which should be almost their last. He has beheld thousands of our neighbors entering the door of the drinking-saloon without even heeding that awful inscription written over that door by the hand of Truth-" Whosoever is deceived here, is not wise. Here rich men are made poor; thrifty men are made idle; healthy men are poisoned with deadly disease; parents are made childless; wives are made widows; and immortal soughs, for whom Jesus bled, are dooming themselves to the outer darkness of eternal despair!" The Omniscient eye has seen some parents setting the sparkling cup (which "biteth like a serpent") right before their own children; and even churchmembers have orffered that ensnaring cup at their hospitable boards to guests, who have been confirmed in dangerous halbits by the example of professed Christians! The eye of God has seen the woes, and the ear of God has heard the wails, of the drunkard's home. Beneath all this smnoothl surface of society, God has witnessed the most terrible passions of lust, sensuality, anger, cruelty, His Lawd is ile Book. and often of red-handed murder-all fomented and kept in hot fury by the monster curse of the intoxicating bowl. And now, up from this seething caldron of misery and sin, marclhes the question to-day to every Christian conscience, "VWhat is my ditty in regard to using or offering these deceitful and destructive drinks?" Surely our Allwise and IHeavenly Father has not left us in the dark on so momentous a question of Christian duty. If our Father has made known to us his will in regard to alcoholic intoxicants, where shall we discover it? I reply that we shall discover it in two clearly legible laws: the one is the law written on our bodiy coizstizutioizs; the other is the law written in this blessed book, the Bible. God is the author of both the body and the book. WVhat he has wvritteni on the one never contradicts what he has written in the other. Truths never conflict. An established truth of science never contradicts an established truth of revelation. And when any man or any minister attempts to prove that the WVord of God justifies and encourages the use of intoxicating beverages, he puts a fatal weapon into the hands of the infidel. For the shrewd sceptic quickly retorts, "I know that alcoholic stimulants are deadly poisons to the human body and mind; if, therefore, your Bible justifies and encourages their habitual use, then your Bible must be false. I prefer to stick to what I know, rather than believe what you make your Bible to say." So reasons the cunning sceptic. But you 37 3s Goi's Law oiz Mle Body a;zd may be sure, good friends! that I am not going to put such a logical bludgeon into the hands of the infidel; neither shall I put into the mouth of the Christian any excuse for violating God's law, whether written on the human body or in the heaven-sent book. Our bodies, so "wonderfully made," were created to be temples of the Holy Spirit, and not to be dens of debauchery. We are commanded to "glorify God in the body," and every Christian is bound to pray that his "spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ." I. Now let us enquire what law in regard to the use of alcoholic intoxicants, God has written on our bodies? To this question, both science and universal human experience give answer in a voice as distinct as the thunder of Niagara. Science has made long and patient investigation of the statutes which the Creator has written on the human organism, and has established the fact that alcoholic intoxicants are a poison. Science holds her inquest over the bloated, disfigured body of the man who is drunk, and brings in her verdict, This man is poisoned!" Alcohol poisons the blood in every vein. It assaults the very throne of our manhood and poisons the brain. It produces such a subtle derangement of the very texture of the brain, that the drinker is tormented by recurrences of thirst for strong drink long after he has broken off the indulgence. There is not a reformed inebriate who does not carry in his braiin His ~aw i;, Jic Book. a powder-niagazine ready to ignite at the touch of one drop of strong drink. Alcohol is one of the most malignant of all poisons, for by its horrid sorcery it strikes through, and poisons the imrnmor tal soul! Yet, like other narcotic poisons, alcohol has the magical power to deceive its victim by making him absolutely believe that it is doing him no harm! The "father of lies" never made such a liar as alcohol. Even if we never had any Bible, science would inscribe on the forehead of every habitual drinker of intoxicants, " VVine is a mocker, strong drink is raging: whosoever is deceived thereby is not w.ise." 2. Science has a second testimony to furnish. She declares incontestably that alcohol is not a "good creature" of the God of love; for it is nowhere to be found in the whole domain of nature. WVhile the Almighty has created innumerable fountains of sparkling water, he never created one gill of alcohol! It is the simple product of the fermenting vat and the distillery. It is born of vegetable decay. God made the golden corn to nourish and sustain his mighty family; but distillation throws the golden grain into a vat of rottenness, and presses out of the rotting mass the fiery juice of alcohol. God hung the purple clusters on the vine to gladden the human eye and the palate; but fermentation turns the pure blood of the grape into a maddening intoxicant. Even if we never had an inspired Bible, yet science would have written on the rosy-huLed decanter, "Look not on the wine when it is beautifully 39 God's Law ozn the Body and red, when it sparkleth in the cup, when it goeth down smoothly; for at the last it will bite like the serpent, and sting like the adder." 3. But science and human experience hlave a third testimony to offer, and it is the most convincing of all. They reveal to us that God has wvritten on every human body a law of abstinence from intoxicating beverages, by decreeing that alcohol shall lessen the muscular power, and diminish the animal heat, and derange the digestive organs of the human body. All these laws are as immovably true as the law of gravitation. Alcohol is not food. It positively interferes with alimentation. Alcohol, instead of helping digestion, tends to destroy the digestive organs. Yet thousands of deluded people are swallowing doses of gin and -whiskey and wines every day, under the ignorant infatuation that these draughts will aid them to digest'their dinners. MIen will even cling to this delusive lie long after their stomachs have been burnt out by their fiery potations. If alcoholic drinks do not feed or warm or aid the digestive fuLnctions of our bodies, then "surely," says the drinker, " they wvill strengthen me." No, sir! your "mocker" is lying to you again. Intoxicating drinks actually lessen your muscular power. They waste your vital forces. And they waste them to such a damaging extent, that no sane life insurance company will take a risk on your lives if you are habitually addicted to the use of alcoholic drinks. \When the most famous of modern pLugilists was asked if he did not use plenty 4.0 His Law in thge Book. of ale and porter while in training for his brutal prize-fights, he replied, "When I have business on hand, there is nothing like cold water and the dumb-bells." The shameless bully cared nothing for God's law written in the Bible; but he knew too much about God's law written on his body to weaken his giant strength by using alcoholic poisons. I was once told by the most famous American pedestrian, that nothing was so fatal to his success when engaged in a great feat of walking, as even the moderate use of wine or of whiskey. Science and human experience do not halt at these two individual examples. They point us to the whole mighty and innumerable array of noble feats of the hand, and feats of the muscle, and feats of the brain, and feats of the giant intellect, which have been wrought by men who were clean from the taint or touch of alcohol, and they defy you to match those feats by any performances of bodies or of brains which were poisoned by strong drink. Science and experience point to the fact that every healthy human frame instinctively recognizes alcohol as its enemy, and tries to expel it. Science and experience testify that alcohol does not feed a human body, but impoverishes it; instead of warming the body, it first scorches, and then leaves it to freeze; instead of building it up, it tears it down; instead of prolonging life, it breeds a legion of diseases; and, with the smile of pleasure on its face, it wields the red dagger of the assassin! Science and experience invoke before us to-day the millions of human 41 42 God';s Law on the Body and forms that are scarred, and defaced, and disfigured, and diseased by strong drink; and summoning from their putrid graves the myriads upon myriads who for forty centuries have been murdered by strong drink, they propose to them the question, "What is God's law written upon your bodies?" And from the whole mighty multitude of living bodies and of the dead, comes back a voice loud as the seven thunders of the Apocalypse-TOTAL ABSTINENCE! TOTAL ABSTINENCE!! II. We have been reading the law of the Creator written on the human body; now let us read and interpret the law written in this inspired book. \What saith the Lord? In approaching the Word of God to receive its testimony, we must come to it in the spirit of devout candor, and with no disposition to seize upon certain isolated texts, and twist them into hooks to hang our pet theories on. We must study each passage in the light of the whole book. We must look fairly at the general aim and scope and spirit of the entire volume. What is the general aim and spirit of God's glorious \Vord? No one will dare to deny that the aim of this book is to elevate man, and not to degrade him; to purify him, and not to poison him; to keep his soul and body undefiled, and not to make either body or soul a den of uncleanness. The whole trend of the Bible is towards sobriety and self-control. It enjoins watchfulness and "keeping the body under," and crucifixion of all sensual lusts. It commands us to be holy even as God himself is holy. No virtue was more persis His Law in tile Book. tently preached by our Divine Redeemer and his apostles, than the beautiful virtue of self-denial. No sin is more condemned than the sin of self-in dulgence. Our Father sent this blessed book to lead his'frail, sinful children up toward heaven, and not to mislead them towards drunkenness and damnation. I therefore assert, without fear of suc cessful contradiction, that from the first syllable in Genesis to the last love-note of Revelation, the whole spirit of God's WVord is in favor of entire abstinence from every practice which tends to de grade and destroy the human body or soul! The divine law in the book confirms the divine law on the body. All attempts to dragoon the Scrip tures into a support of the modern drinking cus toms-like all similar attempts to dragoon them into a support of modern slavery-only end in making scoffers and sceptics. Our opponents wvill say that this is dealing too much in generalities. They demand an examination of particular texts. Their demand shall be gratified. We have no fear of the result. "Let tr:uth and error grapple; vlwho ever knew truth to be worsted in a fair encounter?" \We affirm that the holy \WVord of God enjoins the duty of abstinence from alcoholic intoxicants. Before this assembly, as before a court, we shall summon witnesses from the inspired record to prove this declaration. First of all, we summon the ancient patriarch Noah, who "planted a vineyard, and drank of the wine, and was drunken!" As we gaze upon the poor old man lying in his 43 4-4 God's Law on ithe Body and debauch, we discover plainly that the grace of God never will protect even a good man from the consequences of sin, while he is breaking God's law written on the body. Had Noah been a "teetotaler," he never would have been drunk. The very "preacher of righteousness" who could withstand a world of scoffing idolaters could not withstand the wine-cup. What member of Christ's church will dare to tamper with a tempter which laid even Noah on his back? I next summon Moses, the man of God, who has recorded Jehovah's solemn prohibition of the priesthood from touching wine when engaged in their sacred duties: "Do not drink wine nor strong drink, thou nor thy sons with thee, when ye go into the tabernacle of the congregation, lest ye die." Even that one passage, in the fourteenth chapter of Deuteronomy, which is often claimed as a warrant for tippling, I am not willing to surrender. In that passage, MIoses records this permission of God to his people on festal occasions, "Thou shalt bestow that money for oxen, for sheep, for wine or strong drink, or for whatsoever thy soul desireth, and thou shalt eat there before the Lord thy God." This word "strong drink" has a very ominous sound; but it is the incorrect translation of the Hebrew word sliakar, which signifies a sweet drink expressed from fruits, and often drank in an unfermented state. It is the root of our Englislh word siugar. This passage gives no warrant for the use of alcoholic poisons, even on the most in. nocent occasions of festivity. His Law iz tie Book. Here let me remind you, once for all, tnat the V.)rd of God speaks sometimes of certain drinks as a " blessing," as innocent in themselves, and as a symbol of spiritual blessings. In other passages, God's book condemns certain drinks as dangerous and deadly. Most unfortunately and ignorantly, our English translators of the Bible often translated both the innocent and the hurtful beverages under the common name of " wine" and of " strong drink." That acute and profound scholar, Professor Moses Stuart, of Andover, has wisely said, "My final conclusion is, that wherever the Scriptures speak of wine as a comfort, a blessing, or a libation to God, they can mean only such drinks as contained no alcohol; but in those passages in which they denounce wine and prohibit it and connect it with drunkenness, they can mean only the alcoholic intoxicant." Facts show that the ancients not only preserved wine unfermented, but regarded it as of a higher flavor than the fermented wine. This unfermented wine, or blood of the grape, could be used without any inebriation whatever. Wlhy, then, shall we not take the sound and safe position that only the harmless and innocent beverages are commended in the Bible, and that it is the alcoholic intoxicant which is there denounced and prohibited? My next witness is Samson, the stalwart deliverer of Israel; the " muscular Christian," for whom, when he was' sore athirst," God wrought a miracle to give him drink. And that drink was not 45 God's Law on /ie Body and wine or whiskey, but pure cold water. As this man of giant strength comes on the witness-stand before us, he testifies that he never touched wine or strong drink, nor even ate of anything that cometh of the vine! Nor did his mother do so before him. He thus escaped the danger of an hereditary appetite for strong drink, which is the fatal secret of the drunkenness of thousands. Fathers! mothers! if you would have sober and healthful children, keep the virus of this accursed appetite out of your blood! Now, what saith the wise man? Let us call up Solomon, to whom God gave an understanding heart, so that there was none like unto him. I will read for you his testimony in close and literal translation from the original Hebrew. Hear his inspired words! "\Who hath woe? WVho hath sorrow? Who hath strifes? WVho hath wounds without cause? Who hath blurred eyes? Those who tarry long over the wine; those who enter in to try mixed drink3. Look not on the wine when it shows itself ruddy, when it sparkleth in the cup, when it goeth down smoothly. For at the last it will bite like a serpent, and sting like a viper." Is there any one in this house who can possibly theist this passage into an apology for "moderate drink. ing"? Then you might as well say that Solomon believed in a moderate playing with snakes, or in being moderately stung by a nest of adders. I might summon before you the prophet Hosea, with his solemn declaration, "Whoredom and wine and new wine, take away the heart." And sublime 46 His Law is lie Book. Habakkuk, too, with that terrific word of warning to every one of us, " Woe unto him that givethl his neighbor drink, that puttest thy bottle to him!" I wish that this thrilling passage of God's WVord coild be posted, not only over every dramshop door, but also over every table on which false hos pitality ever places a decanter. IManly other Bible witnesses, too, I might sum mon. But let us make room for Paul, the heroic, self-denying apostle, who strove to "keep his body under," and who exhorts us all to present to God even our bodies as a "living offering." He it is who was inspired to utter that fearful announcement, "Nor drunkards shall inherit the kingdom of God." We may reasonably expect, therefore, that he will give his fellow-men no excuse for tampering with that which leads to drunkenness. We are not disappointed. Paul is most emphatic in his counsels to entire abstinence. In his first letter to the Thessalonians, he says: "Let us watch and drinzk Z0ot." This is the honest reading of the Greek word, which our translators have rendered "sober." In describing the qualifications for a Christian minister, Paul says: " A bishop [i. c., an overseer of souls] must be abstemious, sober-minded, not sitting by the 7wise! " I translate this vitally important verse thus by the authority of the late Dr. Edward Robinson and other profound scholars. I could not ask for a stronger command to total abstinence on the part of every Christian minister. So rigid was Paul in his-total abstinence princi 47 God's Law oln lie Body and pies that, when he writes to his abstaining brother Timothy, he does not recommend him to use wine as a beverage. He carefully says, "Do not drink any longer water only, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake." HIe prescribes "wine" only as a medicine, and but "little" at that. (WVill some one here please to prove to me that even that little wVine was an intoxicating drink?) But lest Paul's position could be possibly misunderstood, he has left to us that memorable utterance so redolent of Gospel philanthropy: "It is good not to eat flesh [i. e., meat offered to idols], nor drink wine, nor anything whereby thy brother stumbleth." It is claimed that this passage enjoins total abstinence on the ground of "expediency." Well, you may use this word if you choose, but I maintain that it is an expediency that has the tremendous grip of a moral duty. For if my obligation to do anything which is required to save a fellowvcreature from ruin be not a duty, I should like to know where, under the broad heavens, there is a duty? My Bible teaches me that a pernicious example is a sin against the law of love for my neighbor. We have now briefly examined the testimonies of the chief Bible witnesses on the great question before us. Are there any witnesses to be summoned on the other side? We wait for any to appear. But stop! Here comes an expounder of God's Word who brings forwvard the example of his ineffable Lord and Saviour, and asserts that Jesus Christ actually manufactured, by miracle, a 48 His Law izn the Book. large quantity of alcoholic intoxicants to be drunk at a wedding-feast! If we had not heard this portentous assertion made ten thousand times already, we should be horrified. But let us look it squarely in the face. Our opponents will admit that our divine Lord "knew what was in man." He certainly knew also the nature of an alcoholic drink, its temptations, its woes, and its viper-sting. He certainly could have created a perfectly innocent unintoxicating wine, similar to the pure blood of the grape. In view of this perfect knowledge and sovereign power of our loving Lord, we defy any man to prove that he actually created and gave to his own children a draught of alcoholic poison. If the Son of God then and there created alcohol, then was it the first time and the only time in human history when divine power ever made what nowhere else exists in nature! " Thou hast kept the good wine until now," said the governor of the feast. when he tasted of the beverage which Jesus had made. Was that wine "good" which ministered to drunkenness? WVas that wine "good" which contained beneath its ruby sparkle the fang of the viper and the sting of the adder? What were considered the best wines in Palestine? A pertinent answer to this last question is given by the late Moderator of our Presbyterian General Assembly, who declares, in his learned comment on this passage, "All who know of the wines then used well understand the unfermented 49 God's Lazw on thze Body and juice of the grape. The present wines of Jerusalem and Lebanon, as we tasted them, were without intoxicating qualities such as we get here in liquors called wines. Those were esteemed the best which were least strong." IHe is firm in his judgment that the wine at Cana was not alcoholic. This satisfactory opinion of the learned Profes sor Jacobus is also maintained by such eminent scholars as Professor Moses Stuart, the lamented Albert Barnes, Professor Owen, President Nott, Dr. Lees, and scores of careful students of the inspired Word. Our divine Lord never made an alcoholic intoxicant! To this firm conviction I have always stood, and shall stand until I meet him on his throne in the day of his glorious appearing. It is even a profanation to couple his holy name with the fiery potations of our times. I trust you have not been wearied by this brief review of the teachings of God's inspired book. Those teachings may be summed up in four distinct affirmations. Observe each one of them carefully: I. The Bible, in various passages, points out the evils and the perils of intoxicating drinks. It never pronounces a blessing on an intoxicant, and often warns men against its use. Several passages forbid such use. 2. The Bible, in several passages, approves and commends abstinence from intoxicating beverages. There is not a single verse in this boo(k which condemns total abstinence. 3. The whole spirit of the Word of God teaches 50 His Law in ilze Book. self-control and self-denial, both for our own sakes and for the good of our fellow-men. The only passage in which the word "moderation" occurs has no reference whatever to "moderate drink ing." 4. Lastly and chiefly, I find that God's LAW against intoxicants written on the human BODY is not contradicted by his LAW written in this blessed BOOK. Each one sustains and confirms the other. Here I might rest this argument. I trust that it has been made clear to you that total abstinence from these deceptive and deadly intoxicants is safe and sound and Scriptural. But, before closing, let me speak frankly, though briefly, in protest against certain views advocated by beloved brethren from whom it pains me to differ. It has been asserted that the use of intoxicating beverages is in itself neither morally wrong nor morally right, but is a "matter of indifference." A man may drink alcoholic liquors without doing any wrong, or hle may let them alone without any virtue in the act of refraining. The question of drinking or not drinking, often involves no more guilt or goodness than the question of getting up before sunrise or after sunrise in the morning! Brethren, I solemnly protest that a question which practically involves the salvation or the damnation of millions is not to be "whistled down the wind" in this summary fashion. I ask you, is it an indifferent matter whether you violate God's law against intoxicants written on your 5I God's Law on the Body and bodily constitutions? Is it a matter of indifference to go against the whole tenor of God's \Vord? Is it a matter of indifference to partake of that which doth bite like a serpent and sting like an adder? Is it a matter of indifference for you, fellowChristians, to give your sanction and examiple in favor of those drinking-customs which are cursing society and crowding hell with their victims? The proposition that the drinking of a glass of alcoholic intoxicant involves no moral right or moral wrong, strikes directly at God's law written on our bodies, and the law of selfdenial written in his book. There is not a grogseller in Brooklyn who would ask to have his dramshop-door set open wider than that proposition! Again, it is often said that as the use of alcoholic beverages is intrinsically a matter of "indifference," it may be left to every man's conscience to decide. Individual conscience then becomes the arbiter. In reply to this postulate, I affirm that it is as much the duty of every man to regulate his conscience by the teachings of God on our bodies and in his book, as it is to regulate his watch by the movements of the sun. But suppose that a man's conscience allows him to use habitually the deceitful glass, will a conviction of conscience save him from the consequences of his acts? Sixty years ago, there was an eminent clergy man in New Jersey who used wine in order to arouse his nervous sensibilities while in the pul 52 His Law iii tie Book. pit He conscientiously believed that he could pre,,,h more eloquently and impressively while under the influence of alcoholic stimulant But he soon found that he must increase the amount of his dram in order to quicken his jaded powers, and, before he was aware, he had fallen into drunkenness and public disgrace! He afterwards repented in dust and ashes, and was restored to his ministerial office as a total abstainer. Now, this Christian minister followed the guidance of his deluded conscience until it threw him squarely against a divine law as immutable as the law of gravitation. And this may be the wretched fate of any man who does not enlighten his moral sense by the clear teachings of God and of human experience. WVoe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness! "There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." A third proposition is laid down by those who hold to the "liberty" of using intoxicating beverages, which reads thus: "I may use wine in moderate measure, but if I should at length find the appetite for it uncontrollable, I would never toucli it again." We would smile at the verdant simplicity of this idea if it were not too sadly serious for laughter. Mlillions of drunkards now in perdition have lulled themselves at first with this delusion until they found it as deceptive as the liquors which they drank. When the appetite becomes "uncontrollable," it is too late. Witlh 53 54 God's Law on tIle Body and millions of inebriates, the awful appetite becomes their master before they suspect it. For "wine is a mocker." WVhoso tampers with it must and will be "deceived thereby." This seductive and blinding quality inheres in the very nature of alcoholic stimulants. And upon this serpent-quality of strong drink we base a moral duty to let the adders' nest alone. No man has a moral right to thrust his finger into the cockatrice's den. Finally, it has been affirmed that this beneficent total abstinence reform-which has been so nobly defended by the Lyman Beechers and the Albert Barneses among the dead, and by the John Halls and the Newman Halls among the living-has no other basis to rest on than the principle of "expediency." Let me here say that I rejoice to welcome to our ranks all good men and women who forswear the intoxicating cup because they believe it expedient to do so. But for one, I practise total abstinence not only because it is expedient, but because it is right. The longer I live, the more suspicious I grow as to the use of that word "expediency." It is rather too elastic. It often lacks "bottom" and backbone. As a principle of moral obligation, it will not always " hold water." Nay; I have even known it to be made to hold several gallons of exceedingly bad liquor. I have caught it tippling slyly behind the door. I have seen it tripping up even some good men's heels, when a strong conviction of moral right would have held them as firm as the everlasting hills. H's Lzaw iot ile Book. To-day I advocate a total abstinence fronr ilcoholic poisons as a duty towards our God,, duty to ourselves, and a duty to our tempted and suffering fellow-creatures. If the use of intoxicating beverages is forbidden by the law of God written on our bodies, and also by several direct prohibitions in God's Word; if such use is opposed to the well-being of man and to the glory of Jehovah, then is it our duty to let them alone. I therefore set before you the clear, straight path of total abstinence from all intoxicants. It is the safe path. It is the true path. It has led thousanids to that cross of Jesus Christ which is the entrance to everlasting life and heaven's unfading glories. It is a path which has no ambushes, or pitfalls for the unwary footstep. This is the way, stalk ye in it! And remember that no man was ever yet lost in a straight road! 55 THE EVIL BEAST. "IT is my son's coat; an evil beast hath devoured him."-GEN. xxxvii. 33. OSEPH'S brethren dipped their brother's coat in goat's blood, and then brought the dabbled garment to their father, cheating him with the idea that a ferocious animal had slain him, and thus hiding their infamous behavior. But there is no deception about that which we hold up to your observation to-night. A monster such as never ranged Afi-ican thicket or Hindo stan jungle hlath tracked this land, and with bloody maw hath strewn the continent with the mangled carcasses of whole generations; and thereare tens of thousands of fathers and mothers who could hold up the garment of their slain boy, truthfully exclaiming, "It is my son's coat; an evil beast hath devoured him." There has, in all ages and climes, been a tendency to the improper use of stimulants. Noah; as if disgusted with the prevalence of wvater in his time, took to strong drink. By this vice, Alexander the Conqueror was conquered. The Romans at their feasts fell off their seats with intoxication. Four hundred millions of our race are opium-eaters. India, Turkey, and China have groaned with the desolation; and by it have been quenched .. Tze E ~vil Beast. such lights as Halley and De Quincey. One hundred millions are the victims of the betel-nut, which has specially blasted the East Indies. Three hundred millions chew hashish, and Persia, Brazil2 and Africa suffer the delirium. The Tartars employ murowa; the Mexicans, the agave; the people at Guarapo, an intoxicating quality taken from sugar-cane; while a great multitude, that no man can number, are the disciples of alcohol. To it they bow. Under it they are trampled. In its trenches they fall. On its ghastly holocaust they btlrn. Could the muster roll of this great army be called, and they could come tip firom the dead, vwhat eye could endure the reeking, festering putrefaction and beastliness? \Vhat heart could endure the groan of agony? Drunkenness: Does it not jingle the burglar's key? Does it not whet the assassin's knife? Does it not cock the highwayman's pistol? Does it not wave the incendiary's torch? Has it not sent the physician reeling into the sick-room; and the minister with his tongue thick into the pulpit? Did not all exquisite poet, from the very top of his fame, fall a gibbering sot, into the gutter,' on his way to be married to one of the fairest daughters of New England, and at the very honr the bride was decking herself for the altar; and did he not die of delirium tremens, almost unattended, in a hospital? Tamerlane asked for one hundred and sixty thousand skulls with wh-ich to build a pyramid to 58 The Ef vi']B3e7st. l)is own honor. IHe got the skulls, and built the pyramid. But if the bones of all those who have fhllen as a prey to dissipation could be piled up, it Nwould make a vaster pyramid. \Who will gird himself for the journey, and try vith me to scale this mountain of the dead-going up miles high on human carcasses to find still other peaks far above, mountain above mouLntain, white with the bleached bones of drunkards? I will begin at our National and State capitals. Like government, like people. Henry VIII. blasted all England with his example of uncleaniiess. Catharine of Russia drags down a whole empire with her nefarious behavior. Nc Chlristian man can be indifferent to what, every hour of every day, goes on at \Washington. WVhile the Presidential Impeachment Trial advanced, some of the men who were to render their solemn verdict on the subject were reeling in and out of the Senate Chamber-the intoxicated representatives of a free Christian people. It was a great question whether several members of that high court could be got sober in time to vote. Only recently, a senator from New England rises up with tongue so thick, and wvithl utterance so nonsensical, that lie is led into the ante-room. He was a good Republican. One of the Middle States has a representative who very rarely appears in his seat, for the reason that he is so great an inebriate that he can neither wvalk nor ride. lie is a good Democrat. 59 T,ze Evil Beast. As God looks down on our State and National Legislatures, he holds us responsible. WVe cast the votes. WVe lift up the legislators. WVill the time never come when this nation shall rise up higher than partisanship, and cast its suffrage for sober men? The fact is, that the two millions of dollars which the liquor dealers raised for the purpose of swaying State and National legislation has done its work, and the nation is debauched. Higher than legislatures or the Congress of the United States is the Whiskey Ring! The Sabbath has been sacrificed to the rum traffic. To many of our people, the best day of the week is the worst. Bakers must keep their shops closed on the Sabbath. It is dangerous to have loaves of bread going out on Sunday. The shoe store is closed: severe penalty will attack the man who sells boots on the Sabbath. But down with the window-shutters of the grogshops! Our laws shall confer particular honor upon the rum traffickers. All other tra4es must stand aside for these. Let our citizens who have disgraced themselves by trading in clothing, and hosiery, and hardware, and lumber, and coal take off their hats to the rum-seller, elected to particular honor. It is unsafe for any other class of men to be allowed license for Sunday work. But swing out your signs, O ye traffickers in the peace of families, and in the souls of immortal men! Let the corks fly, and the beer foam, and the rum go tearing down the hlalf-consumed throat of the inebriate. God 60 Tle Evil Beast. does not see! Does he? Judgment will never come! Will it? People say, "Let us have more law to correct this evil." WVe have more law now than we exe cute. In what city is there a mayoralty that dare do it? The fact is,-that there is no advantage in having the law higher than public opinion. VWhat would be the use of the Maine Law in New York? Neal Dow, the Mayor of Portland, came out withl a posse, and threw the rum of the city into the street. But I do not believe there are three mayors in the United States with his courage or nobility of spirit. I do not know but that God is determined to let drunkenness triumph, and the husbands and sons of thousands of our best families be destroyed by this vice, in order that our people, amazed and indignant, may rise up anld demand the extermination of this municipal crime. There is a way of driving down the hoops of a barrel so tight that they break. We are, in this country, at this time, trying to regulate this evil by a tax on whiskey. You might as well try to regulate the Asiatic cholera or the small-pox by taxation. The men who distil liquors are, for the most part, unscrupulous, and the higher the tax, the more inducement to illicit distillation. New York produces forty thousand gallons of whiskey every twenty-four hours, and the most of it escapes the tax. The most vigilant officials fail to discover the cellars, and vaults, and sheds where this work is done. 6i Thze Evil Beast'. Oh! the folly of trying to restrain an evil by government tariff! If every gallon of whiskey made-if every flask of wine produced, should be taxed a thousand dollars, it would not be enough to pay for the tears it has wrung from the eyes of widows and orphans, nor for the blood it has dashed on the Christian church, nor for the catastrophe of the millions it has destroyed for ever. I sketch two houses in this street. The first is bright as home can be. The father comes at nightfall, and the children run out to meet hini. Luxuriant evening meal. Gratulation, and sympathy, and latiughter. Music in the parlor. Fine pictures on the wall. Costly books on the stand. \Vell-clad household. Plenty of everyvthing to make home happy. House the second: Piano sold yesterday by the sheriff. WVife's fuirs at pawnbroker's shop. Clock gone. Daughter's jewelry sold to get flour. Carpets gone off the floor. Daughters in faded and patched dresses. WVife sewing for the stores. Little child with an ugly woutnd on her face, struck in an angry blow. Deep shadow of wretchedness falling in every room. Door-bell rings. Little children hide. Daughters turn pale. Wilfe holds her breath. Blundering step in the hall. Door opens. Fiend, brandishing his fist, cries, "Out! out! What are you doing here?" Did I call this house the second? No; it is the same house. Rum transformed it. Rum embruted the man. Rum sold the shawl. Rum tore up the carpets. Ruin shook his fist. Rum deso 6 The EJvil Bcasi. lated the hearth. Ruiis changed that paradise into a hell! I skeicn two men that you know very well. The first graduated from one of our literary insti tutions. His father, mother, brothers, and sisters were present to see him graduate. They heard the applauding thunders that greeted his speech. They saw the bouquets tossed to his feet. They saw the degree conferred and the diploma given. He never looked so well. Everybody said, "WVhat a noble brow! What a fine eye! What gracefull manners! What brilliant prospects!," All the world opens before him, and cries, " Hurrah! hurrah!" I\Ian the second: Lies in the station-houtse tonight. The doctor has just been sent for to bind up the gashes received iii a fight. His hair is matted, and makes him look like a wild beast. His lip is bloody and cut. Who is this battered and bruised wretch that was picked up by the police, and carried in drunk, and foul, and bleeding? Did I call him man the second? He is man the first! Rum transformed him. Rum destroyed his prospects. Rum disappointed parental expectation. Rum withered those garlands of commencement day. Rum cut his lip. Rum dashed out his manhood. RUM, accursed RUM! This foul thing gives one swing to its scythe, and our best merchants fall; their stores are sold, and they sink into dishonored graves. Again it swings its scythe, and some of our best 63 The Evil ]east. physicians fall into sufferings that their wisest prescriptions cannot cure. Again it swings its scythe, and ministers of the Gospel fall from the heights of Zion, with long resounding crash of ruin and shame. Some of your own households have already been shaken. Perhaps you can hardly admit it; but where was your son last night? WVhere was he Friday night? Where was he Thursday night? Wednesday night? Tuesday night? Monday night? Nay, have not some of you in your own bodies felt the power of this habit? You think that you could stop? Are you sure you could? Go on a little further, and I am sure you cannot. I think, if some of you should try to break away, you would find a chain on the right wrist, and one on the left; one on the right foot, and another on the left. This serpent does not begin to hurt until it has wound round and round. Then it begins to tighten, and strangle, and crush, until the bones crack, and the blood trickles, and the eyes start from their sockets, and the mangled wretch cries, " O God! O God! help! help!" But it is too late; and not even the fires of woe can melt the chain when once it is fully fastened. I have shown you the EVIL BEAST. The question is, \Who will hunt him down, and how shall we shoot him? I answer, First, by getting our children right on this subject. Let them grow up with an utter aversion to strong drink. Take care how you administer it even as medicine. If you 64 The Evil Beast. find that they have a natural love for it, as some have, put in a glass of it some horrid stuff, and make it utterly nauseous. Teach them, as faithfully as you do the catechism, that rum is a fiend. Take them to the almshouse, and show them the wreck and ruin it works. Walk with them into the homes that have been scourged by it. If a drunkard hath fallen into a ditch, take theni right up where they can see his face, bruised, savage. and swollen, and say, "Look, my son. Rum did that!" ILooking out of your window at some one who, intoxicated to madness, goes through the street, brandishing his fist, blasphem ing God, a howling, defying, shouting, reeling, raving, and foaming maniac, say to your son, " Look; that man was once a child like you." As you go by the grogshop, let them know that that is the place where men are slain, and their wives made paupers, and their children slaves. Hold out to your children all warnings, all rewards, all counsels, lest in after-days they break your heart and curse your gray hairs. A man laughed at my father for his scrupulous temperance principles, and said: "I amn more liberal than you. I always give my children the sugar. in the glass after we have been taking a drink." Three of his sons have died drunkards, and the fourth is imbecile through intemperate habits. Again, we will battle this evil at the ballot-box. How many men are there who can rise above the feelings of partisanship, and demand that our officials shall be sober men? 65 The Evil Beasl. I maintain that the question of sobriety is higher than the question of availability; and that, however eminent a man's services may be, if he have habits of intoxication, he is unfit for any office in the gift of a Christian people. Our laws will be no better than the men who make them. Spend a few days at Harrisburg, or Albany, or Washington, and you will find out why, upon these subjects, it is impossible to get righteous enactments. Again, we will war upon this evil by organized societies. The friends of the rum traffic have banded together; annually issue their circulars; raise fabulous sums of money to advance their interests; and by grips, pass-words, signs, and strat-agems set at defiance public morals. Let us confront them with organizations just as secret, and, if need be, with grips, and pass-words, and signs maintain our position. There is no need that our philanthropic societies tell all their plans. I am in favor of all lawful strategy in the carrying on of this conflict. I wish to God we could lay under the wine-casks a train which, once ignited, would shake the earth with the explosion of this monstrous iniquity! Again, we will try the power of the pledge. There are thousands of men who have been saved by putting their names to such a document. I know it is laughed at; but there are some men who, having once promised a thing, do it. "Some have broken the pledge." Yes; they were liars. But all men are not liars. I do not say that it is 66 Thze Ezvil Beasl. the duty of all persons to make such signature; but I do say that it would be the salvation of many of you. The glorious work of Theobald Mathew can never be estimated. At his hand four millions of people took the pledge, and multitudes in Ireland, England, Scotland, and America have kept it till this day. The pledge signed to thousands has beeni the proclamation of emancipation. Again, we expect great things from inebriate asylums. They have already done a glorious work. I think that we are coming at last to treat inebriation as it ought to be treated, namely, as an awful disease, self-inflicted, to be sure, but nevertheless a disease. Once fastened upon a man, sermons won't cure him; temperance lectures will not eradicate it; religious tracts will not remove it; the Gospel of Christ will not arrest it. (r,ce under the power of this awful thirst, the man is bound to go on; and, if the foaming glass were on the other side of perdition, he would wade through the fires of hell to get it. A young man in prison had such a strong thirst for intoxicating liquors that he cut off his hand at the wrist, called for a bowl of brandy in order to stop the bleeding, thrust his wrist into the bowl, and then drank the contents. Stand not, when the thirst is on him, between a man and his cups. Clear the track for him. Away with the children; he would tread their life out. Away with the wife; he wvould dash her to death. Away with the cross; he would run it 67 Thye Evil Beast. down. Away with the Bible; he would tear it up for the winds. Away with heaven; he considers it worthless as a straw. "Give me the drink! Give it to me! Though hands of blood pass up the bowl, and the soul trembles over the pit —the drink! give it to me! Though it be pale with tears; though the froth of everlasting anguish float on the foam-give it to me! I drink to my wife's woe; to my children's rags; to my eternal banishment from God, and hope, and heaven! Give it to-me! the drink!" Again, we will contend against these evils by trying to persuade the respectable classes of society to the banishment of alcoholic beverages. You who move il elegant and refined associations; you who drink the best liquors; you who never drink until you lose your balance, let us look each other in the face on this subject. You have, under God, in your power the redemption of this land from drunkenness. Empty your cellars and wine-closets of the beverage, and then come out and give us your hand, your vote, your prayers, your sympathies. Do that, and I will promise three things: First, That you will find unspeakable happiness in having done your duty. Secondly, You will probably save somebodyperhaps your own child. Thirdly, you will not, in your last hour, have a regret that you made the sacrifice, if sacrifice it be. As long as you make drinking respectable, drinking customs will prevail, and the ploughshare of death, drawn by terrible disasters, will 68 Thze Evil Beast. go on turning up this whole continent, from end to'end, with the long, deep, awful furrow of drunkards' graves. Oh! how this rum fiend would like to go and hang up a skeleton in your beautiful house, so that, when you opened the front door to go in, you would see it in the hall; and, when you sat at your table, you would see it hanging from the wall; and, when you opened your bedroom, you would find it stretched upon your pillow; and, waking at night, you would feel its cold hand passing over your face and pinching at your heart. There is no home so beautiful but it may be devastated by the awful curse. It throws its jargon into the sweetest harmony. What was it that silenced Sheridan's voice, and shattered the golden sceptre with which he swayed parliaments and courts? WVhat foul sprite turned the sweet rhythm of Robert Burns into a tuneless babble? What brought down the majestic form of one who awed the American Senate with his eloquence, and after a while carried him home dead-drunk from the office of Secretary of State? WVhat was it that swamped the noble spirit of one of the heroes of the last war, until, the other night, in a drunkeil fit, he reeled from the deck of a Western steamer, and was drowned? There was one -whose voice we all loved to hear. He was one of the most classic orators of the century. People wondered why a man of so pure a heart and so excellent a life should have such a sad countenance always. They knew not that his wife was a sot. 69 Tile ~vil Beast. I call upon those who are guilty of these indulgences to quit the path of death. Oh! what a change it would make in your home! Do you see how everything there is being desolated? Would you not like to bring back joy to your wife's heart, and have your children come out to meet you with as much confidence as once they showed? Would you not like to rekindle the home-lights that long ago were extinguished? It is not too late to change. It may not entirely obliterate from your soul the memory of wasted years and a ruined reputation, nor smooth out from your anxious brow the wrinkles which trouble has ploughed. It may not call back unkind words uttered or rough deeds done; for perhaps in those awful moments you struck her! It may not take from your memory the bitter thoughts connected with some little grave. But it is not too late to save yourself, and secure for God and your family the remainder of your fast-going life. But perhaps you have not utterly gone astray. I may address one who may not have quite made up his mind. Let your better nature speak out. You take one side or the other in the war against drunkenness. Have you the courage to put your foot downright, and say to your companions and friends, "I will never drink intoxicating liquor in all my life; nor will I countenance the habit in others "? Have nothing to do with strong drinlk. It has turned the earth into a place of skulls, and has stood openiing the gate to a lost world to let 70 Tze Evil Beast. in its victims, until now the door swings no more upon its hinges, but, day and night, stands wide open to let in the agonized procession of doomed men. Do I address one whose regular work in life is to administer to this appetite? For God's sake, get out of that business! If a woe be pronounced upon the man who gives his neighbor drink, howxv many woes must be hanging over the man who does this every day and every hour of tlhe day! God knows better than you do yourself the number of drinks you have poured out. You keep a list; but a more accurate list has been kept than yours. You may call it Burgundy, Bourbon, Cognac, Heidsieck, Hock: God calls it strong drink. Whether you sell it in low oyster cellar or behind the polished counter of first-class hotel, the divine curse is upon you. I tell you plainly that you will meet your customers one day when there will be no counter between you. When your work is done on earth, and you enter the reward of your business, all the souls of the limenl whom you have destroyed will crowd around you, and pour their bitterness into your cup. They will showv you their wounds, and say, "You made them"; and point to their unquenchable thirst, and say, "You kindled it "; and rattle their chain, and say, "You forged it." Then their united groans will smite your ear; and, with the hands out of which you once picked the sixpenices and the dimes, they will push yout off the verge of PI Thze Evil Beast. great precipices; while rolling up from beneath, and breaking among the crags of death, will thunder: "Woe to him.n that givet1i his neighbor drink!" 72 THE GOOD SAMARITAN. "A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho," etc.-LuKE x. 30. LL are familiar with the circumstances which called forth this parable. A certain lawyer, not a lawyer as comrmonly understood by us, but rather what in our day would be denominated a divine, or expounder of the Scriptures. This man belonged to a class who among the Jews made the Bible their peculiar study, and who were therefore regarded as authorities on all questions connected with the laws of Moses. Having heard of him whose fame filled the land, this lawyer, with a desire perhaps to ascertain whether Jesus was as great a Teacher as reported, put this question to the Saviour, "M aster, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?" Knowing who it was that asked the question, and his motive in so doing, Jesus replied by asking a question directly in the line of the interrogator's profession, "W hat is written in the law? how readest thou?" To this. the lawyer replied by reciting the sum of the ten commandments. "This do," said Jesus, "and thou shalt live." Conscious that all this he had not done, yet unwilling to acknowledge it, and thinking he sees a door open through which he can escape from the dilemma into which his own question has brought himself, he asks, "Who is my 7'ze Goodi S;aviariLan. neighbor?" hoping that if the term neighbor can be kept within narrow limits, he may yet be all right. In reply, our Lord narrates the beautiful and touching story of the Good Samaritan, thn parable which we have chosen as the theme of our mornino-'s discourse. TIlE SCENE is laid in a wild and rocky district of country lying between Jerusalem and Jericho, whose mountain caves furnish hiding-places to men as savage as the scenes they infest. The testimony of the Jewish historian, Josephus, as well as that of Jerome and others, confirms the Gospel narrative as to the dangers which beset travellers journeyimg between these two large cities; yea, so many murders had been committed at one particular part of the road that it was called the Red or Bloody Way; and so unsafe had it become for travellers, that Jerome states the Romans found it necessary to erect a fort there for their protection. It was somewhere among the rocky defiles of this road that the traveller was waylaid by robbers, wounded. stripped, robbed, and left half-dead. Now, if there be a traveller robbed and wounded on the journey of life, it is the drunkard; and, if there be a bloody path in the journey of life, that path is the way which the drunkard pursues; and if there be a class of men to be met with who, answering to the description of- tl-ose who inifcstedtfor the purposes of plunder and murt-der —thec road between Jerusalem and 74 Tze Good Samtaritan. Jericho, is it not that class who waylay the unwary at every turn, and prey upon the vices, weaknesses, and excesses of the thougchtless drunkard? TIHE OBJECT. (I.) I?i the injzuries he received-This traveller was wounded and left half-dead; loss of blood and exposure would doubtless, if help had not been rendered, have speedily deprived him of life. Does it fare any better with the victim of strong drink? (a.) There are the physical injuries he receives. I need not prove to you that alcohol from its very nature cannot be received into the human system without doing it violence. The drunkard does not need a doctor's certificate with 2,000 names attached to convince him that intoxicating drink is his enemy. \What are his feelings subsequent to a debauch? His head aches dreadfully, the skin is dry, the mouth is parched, and thirst ex cessive. Look at his eyes-where is their wonted fire? Listen to him when he speaks-his very voice is changed. There is not a blood-vessel that does not suffer from the scorching liquid. Every vein in his body is made a highway for torture to travel on. There is not a nerve in the whole animal economy escapes the withering influence. The heart, the lungs, the liver, the stomach, all suffer. Their natural action is destroyed, and tlhe train is laid for a variety of diseases. (b.) There are menztal injuries. It is not the body alone which suffers. The wound reaches 75 The Good Samaritan. back to that mysterious nature which sits modestly concealed behind its veil of clay. Alcohol, though affecting more or less the whole system, is peculiarly a braiin poison. Now, as the brain is the organ of the mind, you cannot injure, alter, or poison the brain, without equally injuring, altering, and poisoning the mind. A few doses of laudanum will at once convince the greatest sceptic of this fact. But alcohol not only attacks the brain and mind; it affects particular portions of the brain, and hence particular faculties of the mind, in different ways. Thus all observation proves that it weakens and subverts the will, confuses and perverts the intellectual powers, diminishes and lowers the consciousness and other moral sentiments, whilst it, at the same time, intensifies the imagination and other aesthetic faculties, and goads on the mere animal faculties and propensities to mastery and dominion over all. You may tell me that these results only follow excess; if only enough be taken to produce "exhilaration," "pleasurable excitement," no such effects are produced. No doubt this exhilaration, by heightening the esthetic faculties, produces a greater flow of language, eloquence, and wit. But is it not the fact that, when people are thus exhilarated by drink, they will say and do improper things they weuld otherwise have left unsaid and undone; they will tell secrets, are more lash and venturesome, and oh! how often is "the wine-strong Hercules struck down by his own club"-his strength gone, he reels, and babbles, and falls, as if affected by 7(, The Good Sa?miaritan. the paralysis of the insane; yel, how often does the scene close in insanity. (c.) There are the moral injuries. Who can drink without a deterioration of the moral faculty, a deadening of conscience? What is the meanness and dishonesty to which a drinker will not con descend; and from which he would recoil but for the depraving influence under which he has placed himself? Like a hot-blast furnace, alcohol intensifies a man's natural depravity, and develops principles of evil which might never have reached maturity but for the vigor which it imparts to them. 2. The Szifferings Endured.-Vhat must have been the mental anguish of this poor man when left by the robbers? Even at the present day, travellers tell us that of all the roads travelled, this between Jerusalem and Jericho is the most dangerous, and that travellers are rarely allowed by the Governor of Jerusalem to proceed to Jericho and the Dead Sea without an escort, so thickly is it infested with robbers. How did this poor wounded man know but that his assailants might return and complete their work of blood, or that others as merciless might finish what they had begun; or, if let alone by man, there were vultutres and wolves who might sweep down upon him at any moment? Oh! the anguish of mind as hle there lay to die thus; the thought is agonizing,! And it is when we consider the mental anguish of the poor victim of intemperance we realize somewhat of the curse and climax of his sorrows. The mind has capacities of suffering 77 Tae Good Samaritan. of which fewv but drunkards know aught. While the low and ignorant drinkers are not strangers to this mental anguish, how dreadful must the sufferings be in the case of those of superior minds and cultivation. A man may deny the Bible, he may argue himself into the disbelief of eternal realities, and yet, without the ministry of a Nathan, the hour will come when conscience will be more dreadful than the voice of any earthly prophet, as it peoples the scene around him with the remembrance of unforgiven sins and the ghosts of murdered joys. The inebriate awakes from his delirium delight to find himself in a very hell of agony. Others can gather joys from the past, but not he. What memories can he call up that he would not rather have buried for ever? "Oh! the agony! the agony!" said one to me, the other day-a gentleman known throughout the whole land, endowed with as fine a mind as ever God gave to mortal, and whose sympathies and affections are as tender and loving as his intellect is great and noble, but who, yielding to temptation, became a victim to the "cup "-" oh! the agony! the agony of these few days! All the trials and sorrows and griefs of my past life (fifty years), rmd they have been neither few nor light, are not to be compared to the suffering of these few days. For," he added, "in these I have had consolations and alleviations, but in this none. The essence of my misery is, it is self-procured." No wonder, rather than endure such agonies, many seek refuge in tlhe death of the suicide. Is TIye Good S3bm(zarilaze. 3. Tlicre is the Ioss Suzstaincd.-The thieves stripped the poor traveller of his raiment, robbed hliim of his money, his time, and his strength. All this and something worse befalls the drunkard: he is robbed of that which is dearer to him than all —character. WVhen character is gone, all that gives to human existence its worth and signifi cance is gone, and man becomes no better than the brute, no better than a graven image; he sinks to a level with the beast hie drives, or the acres he ploughs. Now, of ail the causes which contribute to ruin character, tile most formidable is intoxicating drink. I have seen, and you have seen, men in every department of human pursuit, ot the noblest natures and highest attainments, sacrificed to rum. I have seen, and you, too, perhaps, ladies of high birth, of generous affection, of accomplished manners and cultivated mind, excluded from the very society in which they were made drunkards, pensioned off in some cases, and doomed in the private asylum to a life of ignoble restrictions; and in others, cast out for children to hoot at, and passers-by to sigh over in sentimental pity. Oh! what has not this accursed vice wrought in the. w-ay of ruining character? \What character so nloble and so sacred that it has not blasted? Touched by its hell-fire flames, I have seen, and you have seen, the laurel crown changed into ashles on the head of morning genius, and the ving's of the poet scorched by it, and they who Dolce played in the light of sunbeams and soared 79 oThe Good Samritan-iiz. to Alpine heights of fame basely crawling in the dust-the finest mind paralyzed, and the noblest intellect turned into drivelling idiotcy. Statesmen of no mean fame nor talents we have helped to lift out of Boston gutters. The ermine of the judge and the sacred robe of the divine we have seen sweeping the polluted floor of the barroom. In all this, I speak what I know, and testify to what I have seen. M\len of God! in whose pulpits we have spoken, and under whose preaching we have sat, and from whose hands wve have received the communion elements, we have seen dragged from the altar, deposed from the ministry, and degraded before the world as drunkards, and sent, blasted in character and reputation, with quivering lips, and a hell burnini within the breast, to homes where once nestled loved ones, but whom they have beggared and disgraced. And these men-whom once I would have as little expected to fall as some of you-as you believe it possible that this vice shall yet degrade me from the pulpit, and cause my boy to blush at mention of his father's name-some of them lie in dishonored graves, some are teaching school, while others are seeking to eke out a living as pedlars of stationery and canvassers for books, and one, as common hostler in a public livery-stable of Boston, has more than once curried the speaker's horse. Oh! the tales we could narrate. Away down in the lowest stratum of human misery and degradation, how many formerly opulent merchants and prosperous tradesmen have wve found So The Good Sam/ri1,'t. in our explorations! But is the drinker the oily sufferer? No, no! WVho has not heard a thiousand times repeated the story of the drunkard's home and the wrongs of wife and children. Oh! the domestic sorrows, the miseries caused by drink! Who shall tell of the tears of deserted, starving, wretched, bruised, bleeding, dying women produced by the drinking habits of husbands who once loved them, but who are now dead to every humane feeling, who have violated every sacred vow, and sundered every holy bond? WVho shall tell of children trembling at their own father's footsteps, and hiding from his violence? Who shall tell how scenes of domestic bliss have been embittered and converted into scenes of the blackest, saddest misery and woe? The history of these broken-hearted wives, starved, murdered children, like Ezekiel's roll, is written within "with lamentations and weep ings and woe." Nor in all this do we refer only to the homes of the poor, though scenes in such homes we have witnessed enough to make a man exclaim with Jeremiah, "0 that mine head were waters, and mine eyes a fountain of tears, that I might weep day and night." One man, a fine mechanic, earning the highest wages, was once the head of a happy family, but drink entered, and happiness fled. His is the old story of descent. One night, I remember it well, this man came to his wretched home, as usual, a reeling drunkard; his wife, Nwho had been sick for Si 7The Goo(I Saniari-ian. some days, was at this time very ill indeed. T'he sight of her sobered to some extent the husband, and he acceded to her request to go and get some medicine. Taking the prescription in his hand, he went to the druggist, got the medicine, but on his return was met by some of his associates, who urged him to go and take just one drink with themn. He yielded, drank, and forgot his errand and his suffering wife, and only left that bar-room when he was driven forth by its landlord. On reaching home he was too stupefied to help either himself or his wife. So he rolled himself over op the bed beside the suffering one. During the night the poor woman died but terrible was that nighlit. The heavens seemed on fire, the lightnings flashed, and the thunders roared. The terrific storm awoke the sleeper; and on opening his eyes he saw beside him the corpse of her whom, before the speaker, at the altar of God, he had sworn to protect and cherish until death. Talk of the refined cruelty which the savage Indians of this land formerly exercised towards their victims! Oh! what prolonged torture did that unhappy woman undergo, week after week, at the hands of her husband! And drink did all this. A kinder husband, when hle let drink alone, never lived. Done! Oh! what could we not tell? The money we have given to the girl, that the mother might buy a coffin in which to lay the form of her dead child, has been taken from that girl by the father in sl)ite of the en TI,, Good/ Salz/, z. tr(eaties of the suffering mother, and, leaving the leked corpse of his child lying upon the table, Gv,sclre we found it, hle has gone and spent the n-oney for drink! But there are homes never visited by the police in search of crime or to stay ;i,)icnce, nor by the missionary to feed the hun,i or clothe the naked-homes of the outwvardly respectable and even affluent, where there are ruined means, broken hearts, careworn ftrces, blasted reputations, untold sorrows; and drink has done all! Did time and delicacy permit, I could detail, at length, cases which have come under my own observation, and in which my advice has been sought, during my short residence in Boston, saying nothing of my longer experience in New York, which would call forth your deepest commiseration on behalf of the victims, and rouse your just indignation against that which produces such misery. But you say we exaggerate. Exaggerate? Impossible! As there are grand, bold, beautiful scenes in the physical world which no flight of fancy, no bold strokes of painting, no graphic powers of language, can accurately describe, so, in the moral world, there are scenes of sorrovw,. and starvation, and disease, and vice, and cruelty, and death, of which we can give no adequate idea. Let no one fancy we select the worst cases or present the worst side of the picture before them. Believe me, it is impossible to exaggerate; impossible even truthfully to paint the effect of this vice either on those who are addicted to it or ,S, I I Tze Good S(zazariian. those who suffer from it. Are there not many here who can testify to this? Ah! few indeed are the families amongst us so happy as not to have had some one near and dear to them either engulfed in this vice or hanging over the preci pice. I have read of a mother who saw her only son drowned before her eyes. Years came and went ere she could calmly look upon the ocean or hear, without pain, the roar of the billows where her son was lost. How many of you have greater cause for hating the sight of the cup that intoxicates! Take your family record; examine the roll. Is there not one name there that fills your heart with anguish? Oh! what memories are associated with that name! What struggles with temptation it recalls! What mingling of joys and sorrows, of hopes and fears! What solemn vows made and violated! what resolutions formed and broken! and what a sad, sad end! Oh! the beggars, the widows, the orphans, the crimes, the woes caused by these drinks! Truly might they be called the seven vials of his wrath, more destructive in their consequences than war, plague, pestilence, or famine-yea, than all combined; slow, it may be, in their march, but oh! they are sure in their grasp, consigning the body to the tomb and the soul to hell! Yes, the soul; for "no drunkard shall inherit tlhe kingdom of God;" and what standards, scales, or calculations can we command to give us even a faint conception of the worth of onze soul? Z4 The Good Samaitan. II.-THtE INDIFFERENCE AND NEGLECT WITH WHICIHI THE TRAVELLER WAS TREATED. While the poor man lay in his wretched condition, a priest and a Levite came that way. So soon as the priest got his eye upon him, he kept as far off as he could; and the Levite did little more, for, although he halted a moment and looked at him, he grudged the aid demanded and hurried away. Here are representative cha racters of many who treat the drunkard with similar indifference and neglect. The priest did not so much as stop to look at the victim. It was by chance he came that way. Had he known of this case of bleeding humanity, he would doubtless have gone another way. Also, how many are there who care not to look upon the victims of intemperance-who will not hear of them! They never read a temperance tract, never hear a temperance sermon, nor attend a temperance meeting. They have no sympathy with any of this preaching temperance. Strange that there could be such inhumanity, and that, too, in the church! "Thou shalt love thy neighbor" is a divine command. And "who is my neighbor?'" Every man is your neighbor, no matter what his condition, his clime, his nation. If he who could say, "I am a Roman," could rouse in his behalf the sympathies of a whole mighty people, hlie who can say, "I am a man," should touch the hearts of all mankind. The nature which is endowed with reason and destined for immortality, is not to be 85 Tlze GUoodi Sa;ilitiiaii. passed by as an ordinary thing; and what a pIicture of a glorious nature in ruins! You may measure the height from which it has fallen by the depth to which it has sunk. The miserable drunkard that reels along your streets carries beneath his tattered rags a soul which kingdoms could not purchase-a wronged, a crushed, a ruined soul, but still a soul; and if God's Son could die for it, who may not care for it? Such, alas! there are. It was a "priicst" that would not look upon the wounded traveller-a man who, by his profession, was bound to help him; and, O God! tell it not in Gath that professed disciples of hiliz who found Lus in our blood, more than half-dead, robbed by sin, and sinking into death eternal, and died to save us, will pass by the poor victims of intemperance and put not forth a hand to help to save them, but will themselves use the drunkard's drink and thus delude others to drink and become victims! Not much better are they who are represented by the Levite. The Levite stopped and looked on the spectacle. but offered no relief. So thousands there are who thus treat intemperance and its victims. They may nowv and again read some temperance periodical, or occasionally listen to a temperance sermon, or give a dime or a dollar to help on the cause of temperance, but beyond that they do nothing. As to putting forth any effective effort to save the drunkard or to prevent others firom becoming drunkards, they must not be asked. They would be benevolent, bitt it costs too much. Neither the priest nor the Levite would have 86 7Z/c Good Saei/izz-/al.a. passed by the wounded man if they could have helped him at no expense of trouble or sacrifice. And so many would have no objection to help save the drunkard and stay the ravages of intemperanice, were it not for the sacrifices they would be called to make. They would have to give up their own favorite beverage, would be laughed at by some of their associates and ostracised by othl ers. Yet why should Christians hesitate? In every enterprise undertaken for the benefit of mankind, the Christian public have a part to perform; but more especially when that enterprise aims at the moral improvement of the world. In questions of government, or matters of mere temporal concern, perhaps the Christian may find an apology for his neutrality, as being engaged in objects of a higher and more sublime benevolence. But when vice is to be put down and virtue promoted, he is called upon by a voice which he cannot disregard -by the voice of religion and the voice of Godto take an active and a zealous part. There is no neutrality in this war. \\ hen vice prevails, he is an enlisted soldier, and should ever be found in armor. His sword should be always drawn and ready for the conflict. To do good is, and should be, his employment the business of his life. That intemperance is a vice we have already seen. Can Christians be indifferent spectators of the desolations of this fell destroyer? Can they view with apathy its ravages, and be guilt. less? 87 Tze Good Samzaritan. III.-TIlE I-IELP RENDERED. After the priest and Levite had passed on and left the unfortunate traveller to die of his wounds, one of a more generous nature drew near. He looked upon the sight; it touched his comnpassionate nature. And what though the wounded man may be a Jewish merchant and he a Samaritall with whom the Jews have no dealings, but towards whom they cherish a bitter hatred?-he was a needy, suffering man, and he has the means of helping him. So, instantly dismounting, he spoke kindly to the sufferer, examined his wounds, anointed thein with oil, bound them up, gave him of the wine he had with him, placed him upon his beast, and, regardless of trouble and expense, conveyed him to an inn, nursed him till the morning, and, when his business would not allow of his remaining longer, paid all the expenses, and gave his pledge to meet all subsequent charges, and then left him. Go thou and do for the drunkard what this Samaritan did for the man who fell among thieves. And what was this? (i.) He sacrificcd his TViie.-Some there are who would give up the stronger drinks, but would re tain the lighter, or they would contribute of their means and sympathy towards relieving the drunkard or his family, but you must not ask them to give up their own beverage, whatever it may be. Of course, they will take it moderately! This is a very easy kind of temperance help, yea, it is the very thing that keeps the stream of intemperance Sss The Good Samaritan. flowing. I have not time now-I wish I had-to speak of the evils of this moderate drinking. I wish I had time to show you that every reeling inebriate was once a moderate drinker, with as little thought of becoming a slave to this vice as any of you have to-day. I wish I had time to show you how moderation can never cure inteimperance, because it is the very cause of intemperance, and no cause of an evil can ever be its own remedy. I wish I had time to show you that excess is not, as some imagine and argue, the cause of intemperance, because it is intemperance itself, the effect and not the cause. I wish I had time to show you, my dear hearers, that iiot any of you are safe if you take intoxicating drinks at all. You need not tell me you have used them for years and no harm comes fiom it; thlat you take but very little; that you are educated, refined, cultivated, even Christian. Ah! let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall. I have already shown you that no station, profession, or pursuit is proof against his attacks if indulged in at all. Oh! the secrets locked in this breast of the temptations and struggles of some of the noblest men and women, who had placed themselves by the first glass within the power of the enemy. Dr. Albert Day, who has made a specialty of alcoholic inebriation for years, informed me yesterday that during the last fourteen years over four thousand inebriates have been placed under his care for reformation. Three-fourths of that number were men of position, education, and culture-senators 89 Alic Good Seiiai-ilal. judges, presidents' sons, professors in colleges, doctors of divinity, doctors of medicine, lawyers, authors, artists, and merchants. How the fine gold has become dim; the voice of the lute and the harp which delighted all been silenced! And who made these men drunkards? WVhere did iiien of education and refinement acquire the tippler's appetite? WVhere but at the elegantly furnished tables of moderate drinkers, many of them moderate-drinking religious professors! Why, then, think yourself safe? But apart from this, intemperance is a monster you cannot kill as long as you feed it. All the weapons on earth fall harmless at its feet as long as you give it food. You may as well try to arrest the lightning in its course as stop that mighty stream of intemlperance which at this moment flows over this land, as long as you supply the spring from which it issues. And mark you, all who help supply the fountain are partakers of the guilt! Oh! what a large proportion of the respectable and Christian community are at this moment engaged in the spread of intemperance. The more respectable his position, the more religious his character, the more pernicious and extended the influence of-the Christian who uses it. It is the countenance which the respectable religious moderate drinkers give that upholds the traffic and enables the dealer to sell to the drunkard. Who but the vilest of the vile would engage in a trade for which drunkards we e the only customers? Ajgain, how can you seek to reclaim the inebri 00 Thle Good Samarat'an. ate from his cups, and get him to abstain, while the bottle is in your closet or the decanter on your sideboard? But I pass to speak of the Samaritan who gave (2.) Ilis mio,y.-IHe gave his oil and money. Compared with the rescue of a poor wounded traveller, what was money to him? I say it, and say it without fear of contradiction, I know of no cause to which the benevolent ought to contribute more liberally. It is short-sighted charity that aims at the alleviation of drunken poverty merely, and yet nine-tenths of our poverty is nothing else. A better service cannot be rendered the commu nity in the present day than the promotion of the Temperance cause. But to its promotion money is required; and were the National Temperance Society, in whose behalf I this day plead, supplied with ample funds, the good accomplished might be indefinitely increased. (3.) This Samaritan sticrificcd hzs tihnc and labor. -The Samaritan took the wounded man to an inn and watched over him. Now, to save the drunkard similar help is needed. Yea, to prevent the children and youth from becoming drunkards, time and labor are necessary. I rejoice to know that hundreds of young men and young wvomen of this church are daily doing that very work. God bless them, and all associated with them, in their noble efforts. In one of our large cities, a fire broke out in a lofty dwelling. It was near midnight, and the flames had made headway before they were discovered. The fire companies rallied; the iIInmates 91 The Good Samaritan. escaped in affright; anid the firemen worked with a Fvill to subdue the flames. The smoke had become so thick that the outlines of the house were scarcely visible, and the fiery element was raging with fearful power, when a piercing cry thrilled all hearts, as they learned that there was one person yet unsaved within the building. In a moment a ladder was swung through the flames, and planted against the heated walls, and a brave fireman rushed up its rounds to the rescue. Overcome by the smoke, and perhaps daunted by the hissing flames before him, he halted, and seemed to hesitate. It was an awful scene. A life hung in the balance, and each moment was an age. "Cheer him!" shouted a voice from the crowd; and a wild " Hurrah!" burst like a tempest from the beholding multitude. That cheer did the work; and the brave fireman went upward, amid smoke and flame, and in a moment descended with the rescued man in his arms. When you see those sons and daughters of temperance battling with temptation, struggling with the difficulties and circumstances they must encounter in their work -when, I say, you see them thus endeavoring to rescue the tempted and the fallen, and yet il an hour of weakness discouraged and about to retire from the work, then "cheer them!" Who knows but your words of sympathetic kindness may encourage fainting hearts, strengthen feeble knees, and fix the wavering purpose for nobler deeds? So niuch, dear friends, as to what we should do for the drunkard. What shall we do with the 92 Thie Good Samnaritan. DRUNKARD-MIAKERS? In other words, How is the way of life to be mnade safe for travellers? If robbers on the highway, who strip their victim of his clothes and treasures, and leave him half-dead, are not guiltless, how can those who strip their victim not only of his clothes and treasures, but of character and manhood and all noble virtues-and who, wlhen they bring their victims to the ground, leave them not half-dead merely, but twice dead-dead in body and in soul-be held guiltless? and if we would clear society of the one, why not of the other class? That the liquor stores are at the root of the evil, who doubts? Here is kept the food of drunkenness! Here is found the poison that initiates the temperate and finishes the intemperate. They are the schools of intemperance, and as long, as they are permitted, the land will be infested with drunkenness. These are the Aceldamas of human blood, the shambles where thousands of lives are annually slaughtered, the licensed machinery which turns health into disease, decency into rags, love into hatred, young beauty into loathsomeness, mother's milk into poison, mother's hearts into stone, and the image of God into something baser than the brute. And can any one be engaged in this traffic and not know the mischief he is doing? Can he supply the lava which scorcht s the land and be innocent? Does he not know the effects of that in which he trades? Does he not know that of those who drink maniy will be 93 bTle Good Samaritan. drunken? and can he supply the cause, and detach himself from the effect? Can he hurl firebrands through the city and witness the conflagration, and claim exemption from blame? Can he spread contagion through your families, and, when he hears the dying groans and sees the ftineral, tell you that he is innocent? He may tell you that he frowns upon intemperance, and sells not to the drunklard-so perhaps he may. He will sell till the wretch is made drunk, and then refuse him, till he is made sober again. But it is too late to talk about denying him now. The man is rinzed, and the dealer puts the instrument in his hand with which he struck the blow. Do not sell to drunkards! Is it a less evil to make drunkards of sober men, or to kill drunkards? Ask that widowed mother zseJ'o did her the greatest evil-the man who only put her drunken husband in the grave, thus freeing her of his cruelties, or the man who madcle a drunkard of her only son? Ask those orphan children who did them the greatest injury-the man who made their once sober, kind, and affectionate father a drunkard, and thus blasted all their hopes, and turned their sweet home into the emblem of hell; or the man who, after they had suffered for years the anguish, the indescribable anguish of the drunkard's children, and seen their heartbroken mother ill danger of an untimely grave, only killed their father, and thus brought peace and quietness to their home, which of those two men brought upon the children the greatest evil? Can you doubt? 94 Tl.e Goo~t S,;aneai,an. Now, what is to be done to close up these pesthouses-to seal utp these fountains of desolation? Do? WVhy, persuade the keepers of them to leave their trade, w%e are told! Persuade themn? Have you ever tried it? I have, and must confess with poor results. Wvhen you can arrest the lightning, still the thunder, and turn back the sea, then you mnay hope of success. Persuzade men to give tup their nefarious traffic! lVhy not endeavor to check the evils of lottery, gambling, and prostitution by appeals to the consciences of the keepers of lottery and gambling houses and dens of infamy? Pcrsuade men! There are men —unprinicipled men-so actuated by selfishness that they will sell till the iron grasp of the law seizes themn and compels them to stop. Anxious neighbors may reason with them; wives in rags and tears may entreat them; barefooted, hunger-bitten children may appeal to them, and still they will sell. As long as money can be made by the traffic, there are men who would build their groggery in the crater of a volcano; they would sell rum amid the heavings of an earthquake; and as the drunkard steps down the bank and hangs, suspended by a single twig, over the bottomless pit, they wvould put between his chattering teeth the draught that would unnerve his arm and plunge him into anI eternal abyss. And shall we talk of moral suasion to such men, and let them continue their damniing work because they will not be persuaded? What, then, would youL do? Do wAith them as vot would -with every foe to socicty). If the traf 91, Thze Good Samar;itan. fickers in rum a le engaged in a calling that is inimical to every interest of humanity and religion, then treat them as you would those similarly engaged. Suppose a class of men should advertise themselves as men who had for sale consumptions, and fevers, and palsies, and apoplexies, and deliriums, and death, what would the public say? WVhat the Christian public? Yea, what would our authorities feel called upon to do? The public voice would call for punishment to be meted out to suclh foes of humanity; and the rutlers that would not take speedy vengeance would be execrated and removed. Should a class of persons attempt to dig pitfalls in our public streets to ensnare passengers, or should they make use of bloodhounds to tear and devour our useful citizens, or hire a company of cut-throats to drag out our young men from their peaceful homes and murder them in our streets, what would our authorities do? Tell me where, in the eye of eternal justice, is the difference between him who strikes the blow of death and him who kniowingly maddens the brain and tempts and fires the soul to strike it? The very worst that has been said against the devll is, that he first tempts his victim, then betrays and punishes him through time and eternity. WVhat better are our so-called Christian lawns and the liquor-dealers in the traffic in drink? For money, they tempt and betray and punish the weakest of our race, and but too often send them to an eternity of woe! If we have no ob 96 Tze G(oo Saza 97aita. jections to passing laws against robbery, why ob ject to passing laws against liquor-selling,? As long as these shops of temptation are open, who are safe? You, or your children? None! And what shall become of our weaker brother, whom we have reclaimed, when temptation tracks his steps, and drinking companions are on the alert to drag him into one or other of the numerous dram-shops open on every side to allure and destroy? No wonder so few re claimed men are permanently saved. Less than two years ago, there died in his early prime a minister of the Gospel, who was first the victim, and at last the conqueror, of drink. Some years ago, after a severe illness, he stimulated by medical advice. When he had fairly recovered from his sickness, he found himself in the coils of a serpent. It was the old story, alas! more than "twice told!" Hle fell, struggled to rise, stum bled, and fell again. He resolved, and resisted, prayed, and then in exhaustion yielded. At length, he was induced to enter an inebriate institution, where for a year he remained, beloved and respected by all the officers. When his cure was supposed to be complete, he left to accept a call to a vacant pulpit, his heart still yearning to be engaged in his Lord's work. On entering flliat church, he frankly told the people his weakness, and the terrible temptation to which he was subject, and threw himself upon their sympathies and their prayers. The people rallied round him and nobly worked with him. Immensely popular 97 7The Good Samzariltzan. in the commnunity, he labored with untiriing zeal for the salvation of souls. His labors God richly blessed, but at the close of one year his strength gave way. Again was he tempted to stimulate and-resisted. By the help of divine grace and human sympathy, he stood. But he died-died a hero! for he conquered the foe which conquered Alexander the Great, and by which many strong men have been slain. At his funeral, his wife seemed unusually composed. Wondering at this, the officiating clergyman enquired of her about her apparently happy feelings. "Oh!" said she, " IIE'S SAFE! You don't know anything about what we have passed through. For years he and I have been standing on the brink of a precipice, trembling withl apprehension that, at any time, he migiht go over. But now he's safe!" "Safe, indeed," says one; " but what a danger is that from which death is the only escape an(-l the g —ave the only refuge!" What an evil must that be which, when a man takes it into his bosuin, becomes a "slimy, gliding, writhing, biting, sting, ing adder, which winds itself around him, hisses its venom in his ear, and, when hle hurls it from him and treads it under foot, pursues its fleeing victim to his death, and thrusts its forked tong,rue against the iron gateway of the sepulchre, until the loving wife exults to hear the clanging of deat'is gloomy doors, which none but Christ can open; and the anguish of widowhood is forgotten in t'e,c,iought that the loved one is SAFE at last I 98 The Good Samailan.9 Brethren, if ever a cause demanded devotedness and sacrifice and energy, temperance is that cause. The interests at stake are the most momentous. Youthful hopes are at stake; female virtue is at stake; domestic happiness is at stake; the churchl's piety is at stake; the salvation of souls is at stake. And who is to do this work if not the lovers of God and humanity? Come, then, "to the help of the Lord-to the help of the Lord against the mighty!" 99 : e * $~tf- enial for i Promotion of cmprkange A DUTY AND A PLEASURE. "It meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth."-x CoR. viii. x3. UCH is the noble sentiment of the noblest of men. Some of the Corinthian believers had been converted to Christianity from idolatry; others from Judaism. The Jews abhorred whatever had been offered in worship to an idol; but the Gentiles had not been thus educated. Some of the latter had eaten of the meat which had been offered to an idol, and having been instructed that an idol is nothing, thought it no10 harm to eat the sacrificial meat. But there were other Gentile converts who had not been so far enlightened, and, not knowing the superior education of their brethren, were in danger of being led astray by their example. St. Paul appeals to Io2 Self-Dential for the Promotion of/ the former in behalf of the latter. He concedes that an idol is nothing; that meat offered thereto in worship is not thereby necessarily defiled; that to eat thereof was not sin per se; but because the eating thereof was a bad example, and tended to the spiritual injury of those for whom Christ died, he therefore appealed to them to desist from the practice. It was an appeal to Christian magnaimity, to philanthropy, to self-denial. Himself the example of self-denial to all, in the fulness of his own great soul he assures them, in the language of the text: "If meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth." This incident in apostolic history suggests the line of thought of the present discourse on the subject of temperance. I propose to appeal to the magnanimity of the better classes in society to discontinue the moderate use of wines and liquors, for the benefit of those who are in danger of becoming confirmed inebriates. And in making this appeal, I propose to make certain concessions; to consider the efficaciousness of this proposed self-denial; and then to enforce the duty by a variety of motives. I. I think we may concede three things. First, that wines and liquors have their legitimate uses. I do not say that they are indispensable, and have no substitute; but it may be safely affirmed that they may be used beneficially. I am sure that Temperance a Duty and a Pleasure. every unbiassed man will feel with me bound to concede this much, and hence those ultra views, consigning wines and liquors to perdition, placing them under the ban of the Almighty and society, cannot find favor with calm and reflecting men. IHad I time this morning, I could establish the fatct beyond peradventure, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that there are two kinds of wine designated in the Bible. On some future occasion, it may be our happiness to discourse on this very thought, and thereby relieve the Lord Jesus Christ, by whose power " The modest water, awed by power divine, Confessed its God, and blushing turned to wine," and thereby relieve other persons whose history is recorded in the Bible, and relieve many passages of Scripture, from misapprehension, by showing the distinction between the good wine and bad, as recorded in the Bible. It is the utmost folly for any man to attempt to explain away certain passages of Scripture on any other hypothesis than the one just mentioned. Secondly, we are bound to concede that the man who drinks wine and liquor moderately is not a drunkard as denounced in the Holy Scriptures. By no fair interpretation of language, by no proper use of ideas, can such a man be brought under the ban of drunkenness as described inl that passage, "No drunkard slhall enter the I03 104 Self-Denzial for the Promotlion of kingdom of heaven." Evidently Scriptural drunkenness implies a ruling passion, a degrad ing slavery, and a power that has gained the mastery, which is superior to the man him self. In the next place, I think we are bound to concede that all moderate drinkers do not become confirmed inebriates. You and I can recall per sons who, through a series of many years, have been moderate drinkers, and yet are not confirmed drunkards. The reason may be found in their physical organism, which is not susceptible to such influence in their case as in that of other persons. They may drink as much and even more per day than those who are more sensibly affected by the same or less quantity. One inhalation of chloroform will put this man to sleep, while the same quantity will set another man wild. The difference is found in the difference of organic susceptibility. Hence some men may drink and not become confirmed in habits of inebriation, because of the peculiarity of their organism. That they are not drunkards is no credit to them; it is to be placed to the credit of the Creator, for that which does not intoxicate them would and does intoxicate others. Therefore, no argument in favor of the free use of liquors can be drawn from those men who, in despite, as it were, of nature, thus practise moderate drinking through a long series of years. Let us, therefore, remove this old sophlistry, and make this point Temtperance a Dut/y and a Pleasure. plain and emphatic, and give the credit to God and not to man. With these concessions freely admitted, let us iiow pass to consider the question: WVere the l)(tter classes of society to discontinue the mode liate use of wines and liquors, would that tend to diminish the habit and evils of intemperance? If so, how? I. It would be the expression of apprehension that confirmed inebriety might follow. It would be the tocsin of alarm. It would imply dangel ahead. It would be the reassertion of two facts, viz., that all confirmed drunkards were once moderate drinkers, and that all moderate drink ers may become confirmed inebriates. Hence comes the law that absolute safety is in total abstinence. There is safety in that for all. This would be an example and a warning. 2. It would render the trade in wines and liquors, including the manufacture and salewholesale and retail-of the same, less profitable, and lead to its abandonment. I suppose it;s true that the larger profits of the trade are derived from the sale of such wines and liquors as are used by the higher classes of society; that the proprietors of our splendid saloons and hotel barrooms derive a larger profit from fancy drinks than from "; whiskey straight." The logical effect of the discontinuance of the use of such drinks by such persons would be the closing up of nineteniths of all our fancy saloons and hotel bar 105 io6 Self-Denial for the Promotion of roomns. This, in turn, would affect the wholesale trade, and this the manufacturer; and cutting off the supply of drunkards from the ranks of moderate drinkers and rendering the article of intoxication itself scarce, the end would be gained, and intemperance would soon cease to exist. Many a man engages in the wholesale and retail busines of selling liquor not so much from the love of liquor as from his cupidity. And just as soon as these citizens find that their business has ceased to be profitable, they will abandon it and go into something else. If these are facts, are we not justified in the assertion that a grave responsibility for the evils of intemperance rests upon the moderate drinker and upon those who indulge in fancy drinks? 3. WVere the higher classes of society to discontinue the moderate use of wines and liquors, the effect would be to render the custom of drinking unfashionable. Fashion is only another term for public sentiment. Acknowledged evils are tolerated by common consent. Public sentiment is the energy of law. There were laws against duelling prior to the duel between Hamilton and Burr, but for lack of public sentiment they were dead. The death of Hamilton, however, changed the public sentiment, and the duellist is now considered a barbarian. Fashion is at once a master and a monster: a master in the supremacy of power, a monster in the cruelties inflicted upon mankind. What and how we Tenmperatnce a Duty and a Pleasure. eat, our style of dress, the construction of our dwellings, our modes of travel, are all governed by fashion. Fashions rarely come up. They almost always go down, till, in the last modified form, they touch the bottom of society. Extra vagance in the rich begets extravagance in the poor. Many a clerk has ended his days in the penitentiary because he lived beyond his means. Many a daughter has forsaken the God of her youth, and gone with her whose ways take hold on death, because she coveted the pleasures of dress. What we want, therefore, is to render the custom of drinking unfashionable, so that those in the lower grades of life will not think that they are out of the world if they do not imbibe from the intoxicating cup. For the lower classes of society have just reason to complain that the custom has been set them iil high places. 4. Then the plan I propose involves another thought. It would increase the power to persuade. Example is the inspiration of language. The life of Christ is of more value to the world than his teachings. Without his lofty, symmetrical character; without his life of unparalleled purity and benevolence, his most wise and most beautiful lessons would be to mankind "as sounding brass and a tinkling cymbal." Here is a father on whose dinner-table the wine sparkles; he seeks to reform an inebriated son. He pleads, he argues, hle prays; but all his arguments are paralyzed by 107 Self-Denial for lthe Promotion of his own moderate drinking. "Physician, heal thyself," is the son's withering reply. The wise must educate the ignorant; the strong must strengthen the weak; and only the pure can save the guilty. " What is good for the father is good for the son," is a satisfactory argument for the latter's use. The persuasive power of example is the greatest. The pledge, societies, asylums, and law are proper, but impotent without it. But against this, our personal liberty may be urged as a valid objection. Personal liberty is a natural right, and the freedom to exercise it is one of the noblest achievements of the age. Each man has a right to himself; to the results of his mental and physical labors; to eat and drink and rest; to pursue happiness. All this should be conceded, and is. Yet there is not in all this universe absolute liberty. The highest form of personal liberty is bounded by the law of limitation. You can grow only so high. You can eat only so much. You can sleep only so long. Conceding this, may we not enquire whether there is not another law of limitation or a further limitation to this personal liberty-the law of Chris tian self-denial which has its formal expression in the Golden Rule," Whatsoeverye would that men should do unto you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets"? And the same thought is expressed in those words of Paul to the Romans: "Let not your good be evil spoken loS Temiperance a Dzity anId a Pleasure. of." Doubtless, too much is often demanded of Christian men. The world is hawk-eyed. It is rigorously exacting. Yet it is better to suffer wrong than do wrong. There are many things innocent in themselves, but the true man prefers to sacrifice them-to deny himself of that which, though in itself innocent, may be abused by others, and innocent pleasures be converted into criminal passions. You and I have a fast horse; made for fleet ness; made by the Almighty- and the Almighty only can make a fast horse. WVe are on the same road, and try their speed, whatever it may be-2.50 or 2.20. There is nothing wrong in that per se. Those horses were made by the Creator for fleet ness, and what is more delightful than to ride be hind that noble creature? But young men ob serve us on the road; they propose to try their Iest horses, and, in addition to the trial, bet a hundred dollars on the result. They transfer their habits from the road to the race-course. and we see before them the gambler's end. Self-denial, philanthropy, magnanimity, should induce us to forego our pleasure for the good of the others. The same thing is true in regard to games of chance. There is nothing wrong per se in our playing a game of cards. But the habit may become an example to others who will abuse it. Doubtless you and I could behold some tragedian or comedian on the stage in some of the grand creations of the Bard of Avon, and there would be no sin in it per So, for God made Shakespeare Io9 110 Self-Dcenial for the Promotion of and gave him his marvellous genius; and may not the day come when men may behold these things without deleterious results? But take the associations of the drama; the associations of those connected with it, and their influence upon society, and the good man foregoes the pleasure that he may save others from consequences that may be traced to the drama. It is a higher pleasure to know that by our self-denial we have saved others from sin and death than to enjoy the pleasures of which we have denied ourselves. Perhaps the noblest question a man can put to himself is, "How may I suffer and thereby save others?" and he only has reached the true humanity who can answer that question by deeds of philanthropy and self-sacrifice. II. But let us look at the motives which should induce you to this self-denial. Let us remember that nothing great or good is accomplished in any department of life without the practice of self denial. Enter yon college, where are two young men of equal endowments and equal promise. Impatient of college restraint, preferring the song,, the dance, the race, one lags in his studies, and with difficulty receives his diploma. The other is rarely seen where wit sparkles, beauty glows, or fashion shines. Pale, thoughtful, studious, his clear eye is dreamy; visions of the future rise up before him. Charmed with the languages, ne hopes one day to speak in other Temperance a Dilty and a Pleasure. tongues, in which great men speak, in which great thoughts are found; or before him are long tables of figures, and he is now competing with the older mathematicians for the prize of honor. Or, like Bacon, he has marked out for himself a new course of scientific investigation. This is the difference between Bonaparte and Washington; between Frederick the Great and John Howvard; between Chesterfield and Sir Philip Sidney. Our forefathers were British freemen. They could have lived in comparative ease and freedom, but they preferred to deny themselves wealth and ease that they might achieve for us a better civilization. The Son of God enjoyed a glory with the Father before the world was. Enthroned in glory, worshipped by angels, the Ruler of the universe, he might have remained amid the beatitudes of Paradise. But he laid aside his crown; he withdrew from the society of angels; he came to earth "a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief," to save a lost world. "For ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though he was rich, yet, for your sakes, he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be rich " (2 Cor. viii. 9). Take the whole history of the world from Adam to this day, and whatever has been attained that is beautiful in art, beneficent in science, salutary in law, noble in charity, God-like in religion, has been achieved by self-denial. Is the sparkling II I I12 Self-Deiial for the Promotioin of wine so sweet and the animating draught so fascinating that you cannot abandon them to save millions from the drunkard's woes? You should be prompted to this duty of self-denial by the safety of yourself and your family. Some of you may drink moderately through a long series of years and not become confirmed inebriates. You may be exceptional cases, but from your ranks will go the majorities to swell the vast army of drunkards. The great massacre in Damascus, in I86o, in which hundreds were slain and millions of property destroyed, had its origin in the quarrel of two school-boys, one a Mohammedan, the other a Christian. The great fire which a few years since reduced to ashes the finest portion of Portland, had its origin in the careless discharge of a firecracker thrown from the hand of a boy. Total abstinence is the only safety of some-the sure safety of all. Every career of crime had its starting-point in some small offence, and then the career widened and lengthened like the Mississippi. - Every drunkard can retrace his life of sin and shame back to TIlE FIRST GLASS. According to Grecian mythology, Jupiter commanded Vulcan to make a beautiful woman, who was dressed by Minerva, adorned with charms by Venus, and endowed with a deceitful mind by Mercury. In her hand she held a casket, beautiful without, but within were all the miseries of mankind. When admitted among men she opened Temfperaizce a Duty and a Plcasure. that fatal box, and forthwith stalked abroad, by day as well as by night, all the maladies and woes which now curse the human race. The first glass is Pandora's casket, beautiful to look upon, but within are health in ruins, hopes destroyed, affections crushed, prayer silenced, grief sitting on the vacant seats of paternal care, of filial piety, of brotherly love, of maternal devotion; crimes of every name and hue, from broken vows to ghastly murders; home deserted; prisons whose horrid doors open inward; poverty and vice, twin companions; shattered forms, tormented souls, a cheerless grave, a burning hell, a dishonored life, an offended God. Where is woe? where is sorrow? where are contentions? where are babblings? where are wounds without cause? where is redness or eyes? In the FIRST GLASS! O parents! O children! touch not the first glass! Be induced to this self-denial by the happiness which will accrue thereby to society at large. WVe shall infer the happiness by contemplating the misery. Shall we call to our aid the sublime science of numbers in forming our estimate of this misery? Statisticians, whose learning and. research command our confidence, inform us that in the United States there are not less than 133,000 places licensed to sell intoxicating liquors, employing 390,000oo persons. And if to this number we add those engaged in the manufacture and wholesale traffic, the total number will reach I I3 114 Self-Denial for tke Promotion of 570,000oo persons, or one man to every 75 inhabi tants. But the whole number of clergymen and teachers in our land engaged in the benevolent work of religion and education is only I50,000, or about one-fourth the above number. It is esti mated that the total cost of intoxicating liquors used each year in our country is $700,000,000, to which must be added $40,000,000 for criminals, while the entire clergy of the country does not cost $30,000,000. It is estimated that every year intemperance sends to prison I00,000ooo persons, reduces 200,000 children to worse than orphanage, adds 6oo0,000ooo to the long list of drunkards, and sends 6o,ooo citizens to premature graves. It is also estimated that while fewer women drink than men, yet a larger proportion of those who do drink become habitual drunkards. In New York, within the last ten years, out of I33,000 persons arrested for intoxication, 66,ooo were women! Alas for a woman drunkard! How our thoughts are roused to pity and our words to complain when we think what might have been the result to us if our mother, our wife, our daughter, our sister had gone in the paths of intoxication! Could I speak to women high in social position to-day, and speak plainly, I would speak with earnest emphasis. To me it is absolutely appalling as I mingle in society, here and elsewhere, to see with what readiness those who are worthily called ladies-called so from their virtue, their intelligence, their education, their acknowledged Temnperance a Duty and a Pleasure. refinement-drink the sparkling champagne when "it stirreth itself in the cup." O women! will you not lift your hands to heaven to-day, and swear that never in the future shall the sparkling wine touch your lips; never again shall your example be against total abstinence? Intemperance is the scourge of the world. There is no evil written in the long catalogue of moral and political woes attended with more harm to individuals or to society than inebriation. Profanity, larceny, lying, murder, are the offspring of intemperance. To substantiate this no elaborate argument is necessary; for the records of our penitentiaries, the inscription on the solitary prison wall written by the pen of time and the ink of tears, and the pauper's grave, are all proofs in support of the allegation. O inebriation! thou habit of folly, thou hast dimmed the brilliant genius of the legislator, philosopher, and orator, sealed the mouth of heaven-commissioned ambassadors, torn the royal diadem from the monarch's brow, and robbed the chieftain of his hardwon laurels. But it would be more tolerable if the evils resulting from this pernicious habit were confined to the drunkard himself. Yet it is not so; for the lovely and intelligent women of our land are the victims of his misery. They drink in secret the cup of sorrow to its dregs and, while we co.mmiserate the condition of the unhappy man, let us I 15 I ]6 Self-Denial for the Promotion of lift the curtain and behold the disconsolate, weep ing, heart-broken wife. Perhaps he won her in the morning of life, when the bloom of youth, health, and sobriety glowed upon his cheek, and the light of genius animated his bewitching coun tenance. They went to the altar with hearts of tenderness and love. Heaven smiled upon the union. The happiness of her coming years lay like an ocean of pearls and diamonds in the em brace of the future. Hope sat, like a bird of aus picious omen, high in the green leaves of fancy, and poured into her bosom the sweet harmony of a terrestrial elysium. But her husband, in an unsuspected hour, forgets his bridal pledge. The sparkling bowl of friendship steals upon the hours of domestic enjoyment; his noble nature yields to the bright eyes of the charmer; and, alas, he becomes, step by step, a daily drunkard. What scenes follow? Night after night finds him in the midst of his family brimful with spirits and passions; his wife meets him with a trembling hand, an aching heart, and a tearful eye; his dear children retreat from corner to corner as if an evil spirit had made its appearance; and even his faithful dog skulks away with the growl of anticipated blows. The little homestead becomes the theatre of family broils and angry blows, and neither his wife nor his children are secure from the fury of his drunken madness. Wihere the sacred anthem should bear aloft the sweet music of the family, the wild song of the drunkard is Temiperance a Duly a;zd a Pleasuzre. chanted to the impious orgies of vice. Where the grateful breath of prayer like incense should waft to heaven their wants and woes, he pours forth a torrent of curses upon their devoted heads. Where the holy Bible should spread its banquet of wisdom and love, he opens the tablets of a heart on which are written the history of wretch edness and woe. Who does not shudder at this mournfuil pic ture of desolation and ruin? But mark the condition of his wife; the cries of her half-clad, starving children ring in her ears daily, and the hectic flush of premature death dries up her briny tears as they trickle down her cheeks; her heart is a little city of ruins-hope, pride, fortune, and happiness, all have departed; and even while she binds up his wounds, his gross ingratitude sends keenest pangs to her heart. While she sheds tears of sympathy over his wayward conduct, his cruel treatment freezes them into icedrops before they reach his bosom. While she would entwine her affections around him as the virgin bowers enfolds tie sturdy oak, his swelling anger and feverish passions snap the gentle cords and spurn her proffered tenderness. But still the doting wife gra,sps the hand that withers her hopes of earthly happiness, and leans tenderly upon that cheek that consumes the sweetness of her youth, her health, her beauty. But why are these things so? Why this self-ruin and selfdegradation? Why this prodigality and penury? 1I7 Self-Dcnial for the Promotion of Wihy this personal and domestic suffering and misery? I answer these interrogations calmly. Intemperance is supported and perpetuated by fashion and law. Fashion-criminal, nefarious, diabolical fashion-sanctions with its unknown power moderate drinking. In this cold world whatever is fashionable is right. No matter how injurious to health, corrupting to morals, or molesting to society the practice may be, if it is only fashionable, it is all right. It is fashionable to drink that social glass; hence, people think they must drink. But let the world remember that in our splendid saloons and fashionable circles the inebriate's career begins, and that Bacchus manufactures drunkards out of moderate drinkers. This is but a mere outline of the picture of the great scourge, which picture, in the fulness of awful detail, God alone can paint. What, then, is the logical, philosophical conclusion, founded on truth and common sense? It is this: That the race can be saved from these woes by the selfdenial of the higher classes of society; it is, that total abstinence is the safety of all; that, whilst some who moderately drink may escape inebriety, yet total abstinence will be the safeguard, not only of them, but the safeguard of all. Then, in sentiment with that glorious man, St. Paul, let us say, "If wine make my brother to offend, I will drink no wine while the world standeth." Doing this, you may be imitators of him who, though II8 emperance a Dutty and a Pleasure. he was rich, became poor, that we through his poverty might be made rich. It awaits your decision. Recall the self-denial of Christ for the benefit of mankind, then follow his example. II9 THE CHURCH AND TEMPERANCE. BY JOHN W. MEARS, D.D. TExT-Ecclesiastes i. 5; Revelartion xxi. S. "'That which is crooked cannot be made straight: and that which is want ig cannot be numbered." ~' And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful." OR a period very closely corresponding with that of the division of the Presbyterian Church in America, the struggle against intemperance upon the principle of total abstinence has been going forward. It was at Saratoga, in I836, that the American Temperance Union took its stand upon that principle, and from that date we count the more than thirty years' war for national, social, legal, and ecclesiastical reform in the use of intoxicating drinks. In this era of church reunion, reconstruction, and revision, when the humble enquiry, "Lord,'what wilt thou have me do?" is rising \vith fresh interest and earnestness from millions of reconsecrated sotl Is, it seems proper to notice the coincidence of dates, and to glance at the relation of the Temperance cause to the church, aied to enquire what may be our duty in this particular juncture, as officers and members of a branch of ChrisLt's church, always among the most 7Tone Clhiurche ani 7fc;iipcarazcc. inifluential, but now assuming a position of eminence and responsibility before the public more exalted than ever. Besides, the fluctuations in the history of the Temperance reformation have beei so great and so far from encouraging that just at this time there has arisen, in the minds of the great mass of persons favorable to the reform, the conviction that permanent success and a final triumph of its principles must be looked for from the active co-operation of the church of Christ alone. Out side organizations, Washingtonian movements, pledges, public meetings, restrictive legislation, the example of public men, the distribution of an appropriate literature, secret beneficial societies, have had their place, and have done their work with greater or less efficiency, and most of them still remain among the accredited agencies of the reform. But none of them, nor all of them together, have been found able, after a generation of experiment, to achieve the work for which they were put in operation. I\More than ten years ago, Temperance men acknowledged themselves to have suffered a "Waterloo defeat," and since the time of that utterance, especially ~uring the war, the state of things became even worse; and now,.although we have unquestionably made up some of the lost ground, have recovered from the panic, which we now see to have been rather discreditable, have infused financial strength into our national publishing operations, and are resuming our efforts at thorough legislative reform, and have secured the cordial and zealous co-operation or I'-! 2 The Cliurch and Temperance. silent example of men in the highest political and military positions in the state and nation; yet the evil of intemperance is still so monstrous and so rampant; the reaction from the earlieradvances of the cause is still so marked even in respect able society; the work to be done is so vast, that the minds of men are turning, in a kind of despair, in this direction for means of successfully carrying on the Temperance reform. The appeal is made with unusual emphasis to the church. More plainly than ever, it is felt that the fate of the Temperance reform is to be decided here. The great advocates of the movement knock at her doors, and wait in her courts to learn the doom of their cause. "That which is crooked cannot be made straight: that which is wanting cannot be numbered." Coarse animal appetite, backed by covetousness and played upon by gambling politicians, is too strong for them. They turn to that kingdom which is not meat and drink, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Ghost; they look to the society founded by the world's Redeemer, who maketh all things new; they recognize in the church those spritual and supernatural powers, by the side of which their pledges and orders and degrees and mysteries are the mere clap-trap of nature's jour neymen, nine hundred and ninety-nine of whom cannot mniake or remake a man. Hon. Henry Wilson, in a recent newspaper article, speaking of the importance of enlisting the American people more generally in the Temper I23 I24 The Clizirch anzd Temperance. ance cause, says: " Can it be done? If so, how? In my judgment, there is but one way in which this great result can be reached. THE CHURCH MUST TAKE UP THE MATTER. It must become one of the living issues of the moral warfare in which it is engaged." We believe this appeal is fairly taken. We believe the specific work and objects of the Temperance reform may be reckoned as among the legitimate concerns of the church in our day. We believe that there is a responsibility resting upon the church for the success of the Temperance cause which has been but partially met. We believe that the failure in carrying any great moral reform points naturally to the great instrumentality for man's good on the earth; and the appeal of men in despair of other means to the church is not more a compliment than a serious charge of dereliction iR the actual performance of its duty; and while it is clear that in every stage of the Temperance movement the ministry, members, and newspaper organs of the church have been its most efficient allies, and that at all times the cause has depended upon these for whatever measure of success it has enjoyed, nevertheless, we believe the church. is disposed at this time to reconsider the whole question; to take enlarged views of her own responsibilities; to acknowledge frankly her shortcomings; to gird herself anew for the work, and thus to respond to the appeal in this critical period of the cause. In arguing, therefore, that the church should I lte Chluzrch and Tecmperance. maintain and advance upon her present position on Temperance, reckoning it more positively among the objects of her stated and regular activi ty, and not contenting herself with judicial deliverances or with occasional sermons, I maintain: First. That the ground of the Temperance reform is that of the plain requirements of Scripture. It is not based upon results of the highest merely human wisdom. Its roots are not in the vague aspirations of the unrenewed heart. It does not belong to the brood of ideas generated in the brains of mere philosophers and social philanthropists, such as communism, abolition of capital punishment, and woman suffrage. It is a thoroughly Christian and Scriptural idea. The ground has long ago been cleared of misapprehension in the view of intelligent believers. We do not rest the Temperance reform on such arguments as are ascribed to it by one of the highest literary authorities in the country ("Appleton's Cyclopedia"): "The demand for prohibition, according to its advocates, logically rests on the assumption that alcohol is essentially poison-precisely as arsenic, opium, and nicotine are poisons-that the difference between wine and brandy, beer and gin, is. one of degree merely, not of kind, at least so far as poison is concerned. They also argue in support of their positions that a4cohol is a product of vegetable decay and dissolution, and hence necessarily hurtful; that there can be no temperate use of it as a beverage any more than there can be temperate theft, adultery, or murder; that if much strong :125 The Church and Tem-perance. drink does great harm; a little weak alcohol drink must do some harm; and that there can be no temperate use of such beverages but their total disuse." That some temperance men regard these extreme positions as fundamental, we do not question. Nor do we intend to deny their correctness: we only express our strong doubt whether they can be maintained from the Word of God with such clearness as to put them among the axioms of Christian duty. The Christian church may not commit herself to them as established guides of her conduct. We cannot take the extreme position that the use of all intoxicating drinks as beverages would be, under all circumstances, and absolutely, a sin; or that the Scripture anywhere absolutely condemns all such use of them as a sin, or anywhere enjoins total abstinence from intoxicating drinks as a duty. We do not hold it necessary even to prove that the Bible nowhere allows the use of strong drink as a beverage. We do not think it indispensable to show, as has not unfrequently been attempted, that the score of passages in the Bible which seem to approve of the use of wine do not approve of it. There is more or less of what we might call exegetical finesse in these interpretations. They may be correct, but we cannot afford to put the whole stress of our cause upon them. Without doubt, the weight of the specific passages of Scripture on the subject is enormously on the side of total abstinence. And a careful and scholary enquiry may 126 The ChIurchb aid 7meiperance. yet make it clear that " there is not a single passage in the Bible that contains an explicit approbation of intoxicating wine" (Ritchie: "Scripture Testi mony," page 1 5 5). But there is no need of waiting for a final settlement of this point; not a whit more than in getting a Scriptural position against slavery, polygamy, or the dancing and worldly amusements of modern society. The argument that touches the rock of duty and that remains immovable, whatever becomes of the others, is the grand and most Christian principle of self-sacrifice for the good of our neighbor, the lawv of Christian charity to the weak. It is Christlike condescension to man, to society, in a state of great moral necessity. Paul, the great casuist of the new dispensation, has announced the principle in the fourteenth of Romans: "It is good neither to eat flesh nor to drink wine, nor anything whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or made weak;" and again, in I Cor. viii.: "If meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to ofifend." The application of this rule to the evil of intemperance is perfectly easy -id universal. Those who question or deny every other position taken by temperance men, must feel the force of this. Alcohol may or may not be poison. Any use of alcoholic drinks may ormay not be sinful. But the enormous evils flowing from their use or misuse are among the everyday facts of our life. The weakness of the mass of men under the appetite for 127 The Czhurch and Temperance. strong drink is a settled physiological principle. No matter, according to Paul, how strong we feel ourselves to be, and no matter how silly and weak our brother may appear in our eyes, we are bound for example's sake to deny ourselves of meat as well as drink, " while the world standeth," in order to avoid all responsibility for the fall and destruction of our brother, and to promote his welfare as a mnoral and spiritual being. In the case mentioned by Paul, the offence arises from a morbid imagination and an oversensitive conscience. Eating meat offered to idols was altogether an artificial sin. But lest a weak brother should be led even into such a sin, Paul enlljoined abstinence from the practice of eatingi meat offered to idols on the part of those who, like himself, knew that an idol is nothing in the world. But here is danger of a sinful excess of the worst sort. \We are asked to practise and proclaim the Pauline principle of total abstinence, not to save a brother, as he proposed, from the evil results of a foible, but to rescue him from his downward path to a dishonored life, a grave of infamy, and a dreadful hell; to avert the doom of drunkenness from a rising generation to bind up innumerable wounds and bruises and putrefying sores of the body politic, and to uphold the dominion of reason and of truth in the church and the world. The Bible, indeed, contains no explicit rule of total abstinence, simply because its law of charity is far wider than that laid down by the advocates of temperance alone. We must abstain from c-,erthziizg that can give I26 The Cizurch and Temiperance. serious offence. We must array the whole force of our example in the support of our weak and tempted brother; we must enter upon a life-long course of self-denial, if necessary to his substantial interests. Do not jeopardize the souls for whom Christ died for the sake of a little tickling of the palate or glow of the nerves. If we are not, in so many words, commanded to organize total abstinence societies and to establish the principle of total abstinence in social and church life, we certainly have a Scriptural charter covering the whole ground on which such movements stand. And we may rightly hold that the total abstinence movement of modern times is as truly a legitimate outgrowth of Christianity as the movement for the abolition of slavery, beginning with Clarkson and Wilberforce and ending in the proclamation of the Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, although no such phrase as "human rights" is found from one end to the other of the Bible. There is an objection to the direct and active interest of the church, as such, in the temperance movement, which still has weight with not a few. It is supposed to conflict with the spiritual character and object of the church. We aim, it is argued, at the conversion of men; at the implanting of a wholly new principle of living through the power of the Holy Spirit. The Temperance reform, and, indeed, moral reform in general, treats only of specific sins, which are but symptoms of the real malady. Why distract the church in dealing with t29 The Churchi and Teiimperance. the malady itself, by your quackery about the symp. toms? Do you not see that, if you once truly convert the man, you have morally reformed him, and that conversion is the only real and lasting moral reform after all? WVe answer, that while the church on earth, in its supreme and final objects, is certainly spiritual in its character, it is not and cannot be a pure spiritual institution. It is partly human, partly divine. It is for man as he is, mind and body, belonging to time and to eternity. It is adapted to the facts of man's condition as a sinner, and as suffering for his sins. It contemplates sin as an evil and a curse as well as a crime. It pours out its Godlike sympathies and blessings on the suffering men and societies whom it does not specifically labor to convert. Surely it is safe for the churchl to mould its policy in accordance with the example of its divine Master. And howv large a part of his recorded activity was directed to alleviating the woes of mankind! Iowv he confronted sin as an evil with the majesty of his miracle-working power, often without even so muchl as hinting at his high. er calling as the physician of the soul. And the prophetic description of the last judgmcenit, with the Son of Mani sitting on the throne of his glory, shows in a remarkable mannier how closely he wvill hold his people accountable for a failure to carry out his own beneficent policy to a suffering world. And the church has never failed to recognize her duty of charity to the poor and suffelriing. It has not been held to be enoLugh even that her elders 110 The Chzziuci and Yepcrance. and deacons should dispense the charitable contributions of the members. Organizations must be formed within and about tl)he churches more effectuially to meet these specific wants, and no one !i,ts foi)Lid fault with them as inconsistent with the s,)iritual aims or internal completeness and sufficiency of the church for all its legitimate work. What is the difference in principle between making a sewing society for the poor a part of the regular work of the church and establishing a weekly church Temperance meeting? If either of the two is shallow and remote from the profound idea of the church, it must be the effort for the relief of the poor-; for the Temperance movement strikes at the root of thlree-fourths of the poverty to which your Dorcas societies are but salves and poultices that must be renewed every season at least. In fact, direct relief is the least satisfactory of all charity to the poor. It is often waste and mischief combined-money worse than thrown away. The true relief to an individual and a neighborhood is to raise their character, to r,-nove their bad habits, to put them in the way ol valuing and diligently using their opportunities of gaining a living. And almost the highest manifestation of the benevolent spirit of the Master towards the poor which the church in our day can give is to engage in active efforts to promote the Temperance reform. But it is asked, Why should the church make a distinction among the evils and sins of the times? Are there not others abroad in the land equally 131 132 The Cliurchi and Temiperance. demanding herzeal? Are not corruption and fraud practised on a gigantic scale, making a mockery of legislation, and converting business of almost every kind into mere gambling? Are they not "poisoning the very fountains of business morals in the metropolis of our country?" (Spalding's tract, "Rational Temperance"); and have not legislators almost ceased to blush at the imputation of bribery, or to deem it longer necessary to hide the hand that receives the price of their influence? WVe answer, that the sin and evil of fraud and corruption are too clear to need special denunciation. They are against the plainest statutes and letter of the moral code. The position of the church in regard to them has never been doubtful. Her testimony is explicit and unwavering. Tlhere is no question of Christian expediency here. It is one of the radical and open violations of knogwn fundamental law. Besides, the sin and its results, although enormous, are comparatively subtle; they cannot easily be attacked by that class of personal efforts which we understand by moral reform. But intemperance is quickly fol. lowed by such a train of gross evils; it is so de.. structive of reason, so crippling to the right exercise of the faculties in the daily walk of life; it-so ravages the bodily system, shattering the nerves, draining the vital force, arresting the natural processes, and exposing the system to every form of disease and to premature and disgraceful death; it so robs a man of the respect of himself and neighbors; it so quickly hurls him into poverty The ChziurcJ and Temperance. and disgrace; it opens the pores of his moral system so widely to every kind of criminal soli citation; it gives him such a pre-eminence-almost a monopoly-of our police and criminal courts, prisons, gallows, poor-houses, and lunatic asylums; it makes him such a vast charge upon our pockets in the shape of taxes; it makes him the centre of such pestilent, lrwv-defying, Sabbath-breaking traffic; it bands hill. and his associates into such a powerful and dangerous element in politics, that it has become THE curse of our time, the demon that is to be cast out of modern society. And the church, which sees her relations to bribery and fraud in the light of the eighth commandment, must see her duty towards intemperance in the light of the law of charity, which covers all the commandments in the Second Table of the law. In a word, it is the use of a beverage which narcotizes the moral sensibilities and the intellect, and which stimulates the sensual brute nature of man, which dislodges him, for the time being, from his position as made a little lower than the angels, which removes and defaces the image of God in his soul, and turns the temple of the Holy Ghost into a lodging-place of demons; it is this enemy put into the mouth, which. steals away brain and heart alike, that we may well summon the church of our day to aid in overthrowing, by special means anci activities. \We challenge every other specific form of vicious indulgence, or openly wrong practice, or accessible evil that afflicts the children of men, to match such a record as the followiing: "The annual amount of I 3 31 The Chzirch abz! 7ezmperance. fermented and distilled liquors used in the United States would fill a canal four feet deep, fourteen feet wide, and one hundred and twenty miles long. The places where intoxicating drinks are made and sold in this country, if placed in direct lines, would make a street one hundred miles long. If all the victims of the rum traffic were gathered before our eyes, we should see a thousand funerals a week from their number. [Think of twvo-thirds of the city of Philadelphia furnishing one thotusand funerals a week!] Placed in a procession five abreast, the drunkards of America wvould form an army one hundred miles long, with a suicide occurring in every mile. Every hour in the night the heavens are lighted with the incendiary torch of the drunkard. Every hour in the day the earth is stained with the blood of drunken assassins. See the great American army of inebriates, more than half a million strong, marching on to sure and swift destruction, filing off rapidly into the poorhouses and prisons and up to the scaffold, and yet the ranks are constantly recruited from the moderate drinkers! \Tho can compute the fortunes squandered, the hopes crushed, the hearts broken, the homes made desolate by drunkenness?" " If, again, it be objected that total abstinenceand prohibition are extreme measures; that the temperance of the Bible is moderation, not abstention; that the misuse of an object is no good ground for setting it aside altogether; that the Christian is one who of all others has a right to rational enjoy. ment, and may expect divine aid in the moderate l.')4 Tze Clziuich atd Temperanrce. use of every good; in fine, that true reform, by divine grace, should make a man capable of manly self-control, and that little or nothing is gailed for the character by abstaining from that which a man ought rather to be able to use in moderation, we can only answer by pointing to facts. Moderation has been tried long ago and found wanting. The fascination of strong drink is too great; the phlysiological effects of alcohol in creating a morbid thirst and craving, futrious and insatiable as a wild beast, are too well ascc!'tained. Whatever may have been the case in Bible lands and eras, whatever may be the case in otherI countries to-day, in America the downward way of the drinker from moderation to excess is too steep and slippery to allow the trifling of moderate indulgence. It is a whirlpool, which draws in swift and dreadful sweep from the outermost circle to the central abyss. The alcoholic drinks of our day are so far from being the genuine juice of the grape or the product of noble grains and fruits, that they might well have come from the caldron of Mlacbeth's witches. "Deacon Giles's Distillery" was a healthyl place, and the scene of an honest traffic, compared with the enormities of fraud, adulteration, and poisoning now going on under the name of liquor manufacture, even among the vineyards of California and Ohio, as well as in cellars hidden under coffin warehouses in Brooklyn. A worse sort of devils than those which wrote " Death and Damnation" upon the drinks of forty years ago, are employed in producing the horrid mixtures of 135 Thle Church and Teipcrance. to-uay, whlich find their way to our sick-chambers and even spread their unwholesome ftilmes around our communion tables. Do not talk of moderation in the use of these vile compounds; give us a tincture of arsenic at once, and call it by its right name of poison. Into the question of a moderate use of a possible pure alcoholic drink we cannot now enter. It is not before us. Such an article can hardly be said to have an ascertainable commercial existence. As well attempt to argue about the propriety of a Christian attending in moderation upon pure dramatic or operatic representations; such things do not exist in any degree sufficient to become a real element in a question of duty; and if they did-if pure liquors and dramatic entertainments wvere an appreciable item of traffic and amusement, they are so sure to become the snare and ruin of others that, even granting ourselves to be entirely clear of peril, it is our Clristian duty, under the principle already referred to as laid down by Paul, to turn our backs upon thieatre-going and wine-drinking, and to set the whole force of our example as total abstainers upon Christian principle against such perilous practices. And if the objector persists in saying: There. are terrible excesses and frauds in business, there is endless corruption in politics and legislation, there are wrongs of the sorest kind in the family relation -following in the line of total abstinence and prohibition, we must abolish business, shut up our legislative halls, and break up the family relations-we answer: The cases are in vwholly different spheres, 136 The Chur.ichi and Temperance. and not amenable to the same laws of procedure. Show us that we can dispense with business, law, and the family as readily as with a mere matter of indulgence; put, if you can, the fundamental, indispensable arrangements of society uponi the same footing with just one of the thousand ways in which we may gratify appetite, and which, if denied, would leave nine hundred and ninety-niine others open to us; rank the use of initoxicating drinks as in dignity and importance comparable with business, with law, and with the family institution, and you may well imagine that you have put a barrier in the way of church action for its abolition, and raised a great argument for the effort simply to correct its abuses. The argument is too idle, not to' say wicked, to be put into shape. Yet we fear that there are those in and out of the church acting, or refusing to act, with a secret feeling that total abstinence anrd prohibition belong to revolutionary measures; and perhaps in the ministry there are those who would hold back the church from the charitable Pauline policy of total abstinence, pretty much as they would hold it back from an assault on the social structure itself to rid it of its abuses. WVhat an amazing, unwarrantable, unscriptural exaggeration of the value of a single animal indulgence! MIan's capacity of enjoyment through strong drink is to be reckoned among the sacred privileges of his being which the church dare not invade! Just the reverse of all this is the true view of the case. In issuing her rule of total abstinence, 137 aThe Churchz andf Tomncraince. the church would be acting in that well-recognized sphere of morals comprehended in keeping the body under. It is in this very region of appetite and indulgence that the Christian's first opportunities of self-denial and cross-bearing are found. So far from appetite and habit being privileged, we know that they are the strongholds of self and of sin; and if a monstrous, soul-destroying, and inevitable abuse is connected with some one appetite which can show no special reason for indulgence save the very universality that makes it so terrible, is not that just the very spot on which to lay the cross of absolute self-denial? Against that should not the church feel specially summoned to direct its most energetic and radical opposition? Do not Christian integrity and fidelity require the church to take the ground of total abstinence against so worldly, so selfish, so carnal, so perilous a course to one's self and others as the use of alcoholic drinks in any degree or form? Mlay she not arm herself with the words of inspi r-ation, and cry: "Look not thou upon the Wvine when it is red, when it giveth his color in the cup, lwhen it rmoveth itself aright. At the last, it biteth like a serpent, and stingeth like an adder." To give a more practical turn to our discourse, let us for a few moments enquire what there is that she church can do, more particularly at the present juncture, to promote the Temperance reformation. Not forgetting the great service it.has already rendered, by sermons and addresses from the pulpit, and by the zeal of many of its members. and not 1 3 Is The Chzirch and Temperance. doubting for a mnoment that the degree to wvhich the principle of total abstinence has gained a lodg ment in the moral convictions of the community is almost wholly due to the church, we are yet brought to a point where we may be conscious of grave omissions and of more serious responsibilities than ever. We have done much. We have lifted the ponderous pillar from the ground. Christian and moral persons in the community, joining their efforts, have nearly straightened it upon its base. The ropes seem to be taut; the last possible turn has been given to the windlass; yet the column slants and bears heavily upon its su'pports. Some thing remains to be done without which all our past efforts will be in vain. It may be just the simple act of wettii,f- the ropes that is needed, and with that slight additional strain the work may be completed; the shaft may swing upright, and sink firmly into its place. Oh! that the dews of the Holy Spirit may fall upon all our Temperance machiniery. It is for these that we wait. This will bring our work to a joyful completion. With diffidence, and in the way of mere suggestion, we propose such measures as the following: I. Let the individual church constitute itself in some definite form a Temperance organization, so tha*. its whole character, influence, and activity shall be publicly upon the side of total abstinence. Let regular Temperance meetings be held tinder the guidance of officers of the church, to which as much care shall be given as to any other weekly service. Let the reclamation of drunkards and 139 Thze Chlurch and Temperance. the conversion of moderate drinkers, and tile pledging of the community to a policy of total abstinence, be recognized as regular parts of church work. My hearers are aware that this plan has been thoroughly tested in some quarters of our church, particularly in the largest church connected with our body, and the largest Presbyterian church in America-that of Lafayette Avenue, Brooklyn, Rev. Dr. Cuyler, pastor. Of this, Dr. Cuyler writes in a recent newspaper article: "In this church (Lafayette Avenue, Brooklyn), we have had for several years a prosperous society, which is as fully recognized by the church as is its Sabbath-school. It numbers several hundreds of members, and affiliated with it is a Band of Hope among the Sabbath-school children. It has a very simple constitution and by-laws, a zealous president and secretary, a treasurer, and a dozen members of an executive committee. The only title to membership is a signature of the total abstinence pledge. Public meetings are held during the fill and winter in the church, and attractive music is always provided. Vast audiences have been addressed by such men as Mr. Beecher, Newman Hall, Mr. Greeley, Gov. Buckingham, Dr. John Hall, William E. Dodge, Mr. Gough, Mr. Barnum, Dr. Jewett, and many other powerful advocates of the reform. The expenses are met by a public collection at each meeting; and, with the exception of Mr. Gough's lectures, tickets are never sold at the door. At the close of each 140 The Ch~urcli and Tempiera;zce. meeting the pledge is circulated. This is a vital feature in all effective Temperance work." One of the best-appointed churches in the Fourth Presbytery (Buttonwood Street, Dr. Shepherd's) has carried on a similar movement, with entire success, for eighteen months past, having secured a thousand signers to the pledge in the first twelve months, including some most affecting in stances of reformation. At the meeting, April 8, although the pastor and the elder who manage the meetings were both, for the second time, absent from sickness, the lecture-room was full, the services were deeply interesting, and a dozen or more new signatures to the pledge were obtained. Other churches in our own and other denominations are engaged in the work on the same general plan, and the results thus far warrant us in predicting the most extensive overturning that intemperance and the rum traffic have experienced since the early days of the Reformation, as a result of the general adoption of such a line of policy by the great body of the Evangelical churches. 2. The church might considerably clear itX position and strengthenl its influence on the subject, by banishing from the communion table the wretched article of commerce called wine; and, indeed, by refusing to employ anything but the pure unfermented juice of the grape at that most solemn service. It cannot be doubted that there arc real perils to not a few persons connected with any use of alcoholic drinks, any and everywhere, including- the Lord's table. Cases have 141 The Cizuirch antc 7emnperance. occurred, and are occurring, of reformed drinkers, whose appetite still lingers like a chained but chafing wild beast, which the first taste may set free in all its original wildness, and who dare scarcely smell the cup as it passes. WVe cannot see how any church, thoroughly pledged to the Temperance reform, can continue to subject themi to this ordeal, or keep them away from the communion table. And if it is urged that our Saviour must have used a fermented article at the institution of the Eucharist, we reply, that in using leavened bread, the modern church has for mere convenience departed from the precise form of the original ordinance; why, then, for an object of far higher importance, refuse to make anothei change as little affecting the essence of the observance as in the other case? She does not hesitate to introduce leaven into the bread; why may she not withdraw the same principle from the wine? But, further, we think it quite unlikely that there was any fermented principle in either of the articles used by our Saviour at the Lor-d's Supper. That Supper is founded on the Jewvish Passover, andl the religious and rigid exclusion of ferment fromn the bread used on that occasion would naturally be extended to the wine, when that, in process of time, came to be added to the feast. It was, we should suppose, just as improper to use leaven, "the symbol of corruption," in drink, as in food. (Thayer.) At all events, the almost universal custom of modern Jews, as we read (Thayer), is to exclude fermcntecl wine from 142 i The ChzurcIh and Tcii'pcirance. their celebration of the Passover. And in the words of institution of the Lord's Supper it is noticeable that "wine" does not occur. The word "cup" appears in its place, and our Saviour speaks not of drinking wine, but of drinking the fruit of the vine, new in his Father's kingdonm. The unfermented juice of the grape might well enough be designated by this general language. There is nothing, then, in the requirement of the original institution which would oblige the mosrigid literalist to use fermented liquor at the Lord's Supper; why, then, make that blessed ordinance a possible occasion of stumbling to anv, which ought to be one of the highest edification. In the strong language of Dr. Duffield: "Shall the cup of salvation become the cup of damnation -shall the cup of the Lord be made identical' with that of devils?" Until the church guards effectually against the possibility of such a profanatio-n, she fails in a most conspicuous manner to give her whole influence upon the side of Temperance. Finally, the whole church of Christ should be recognized as a solid pledged body against the use of all that intoxicates. She alone is the true inimortal order for the redemption of man, soul and body. Why should she hold a lower moral position than the human orders around her? She ought to point to man standing on the slippery places of appetite, the true path of entire self denrial. Crucified herself to the lusts of the flesh, purified from carnal and worldly compliance, with I43 T The Chiur-ck azid Tc,mpcirance. the light of a saintly heroism on her brow, she should stretch forth her hand to rescue the perishing. \Vith a weary sense of the inefficiency of all merely human means of staying the misery, the woe, the wretchedness, the heaven-daring crime, and the frightful waste of intemperance, the orders and societies and public men and press of the land are turning to the church. WVith her is the residue of the Spirit. The dreadful hardness of men's hearts, the immeasurable power of their appetities, the cruel tyranny of custom, the insatiableness and uscrupulousness of avarice have defied all lesser assaults. The monster is abroad again, with half-a-million yearly victims in our own country alone in his train. The accursed traffic is thriving, melting the hard earnings of the poor into a lava-stream of desolation. The foundations of our political life are honeycombed by the sottishness of a large part of our wirepulling and office-seekiing politicians, who control the situation. Laws regulating the traffic are defied. Women are not merely claiming man's right to vote, but exercising what heretofore has been man's privilege-to drink to inebriety away from home. The very structure of society trem. bles. The church, God's chosen instrument foi man's regeneration, must take order to meet the emergency. She is come to the kingdom for such a time as this. WVoe unto her if help arises from another quarter, and if the unbelieving world can strengthen itself in the opinion that man can got r-id of his worst evils in spite of the 144 The CuttrchI and Temperance. indifference or open opposition of a blind and conservative church! On the contrary, we believe that all Christian grace will be multiplied; all Christian life will be animated, joyful, and effective; and all converting influences will be granted, in those churches which throw themselves with generous enthusiasm into this wide and needy field of Christian effort. I45 THE ACTIVE PITY OF A QUEEN'* (Re.orted for tie ocielty by IVilliamn A nderson.) "For how can I endure to see the evil that shall come unto my people? or how can I endure to see the destruction of my people?"-ESTHER 8: 6. HE portion of God's WVord to which, in con nection with the subject of Christian temperance, I propose to call your attention this afternoon, is in the Book of Esther, the eighth chapter. WVe had better read from the fourth verse: "So Esther arose, and stood before the king, and said. If it please the king, and if I have found favor in his sight, and the thing seem right before the king, and I be pleasing in his eyes, let it be written to reverse the letters devised by Haman the son of Hammedatha the Agagite, which he wrote to destroy tihe Jews which are in all the king's provinces: for how can 1 endure to see the evil that shall come unto my people? or how can I endure to see the destruction of my kindred?" In conversing with a brother minister, in Canada, during the summer, upon the subject of preaching on temperance, he mentioned this text to me as one upon which he had preached. It * This sermon is printed from a very admirable report, and not from the preacher's manuscript, a circumstance which accounts for its colloquial style. J. 1. o -o Thle Active Pity of a Qzeen. has many times been present to my mind since then, and I gladly take the opportunity of being invited by our National Society to bring this matter before the people, to introduce the whole subject in connection with the sentiment of the verses that I have now read. One cannot preach from this Book of Esther without glancing at some of the peculiarities of the book itself. The word-critics have been at work upon the book, applying to it the child's test of a proper Sunday book, and, not finding the namne of God in it, they have been ready to question its inspiration. The fact that there has been such an imputation as this is sufficient reason for our ascertaining what can be said upon the sub ject. We should all of us know what is to be thought generally in relation to the authority of this book, because, although we may be a long way on this side of sheer unbelief, yet we may have such a feeble belief, accompanied by so many misgivings, that it shall have but little power in regulating our conduct; and we could not have very much confidence in speaking or in hearing words about the authority of which there is some doubt in the mind at the beginning. When we look at this book in itself, it has certain peculiarities that attract the attention. It is, for example, a very faithful transcript of the general habit and character of Eastern rulers and of Persian courts; and, in this respect, it is thoroughly borne out by all that we know regarding those kings and courts from other sources. In so far it is confirmed in every detail that it touches by profane histo T48 T1le Active Pity of a Quteen. rians, and although the lights we have from his tory on this period are comparatively dim and obscure, yet, so far as they do shed any light, it is of such a kind as to increase our confidence in the statements of this book. The style of the book is substantially the same as that which we have in Ezra, the Chronicles, and other books written about the time which it purports to have been written. It has just sufficient flavor of the lan guage of the Chaldee and Persian to suggest to us that the book was prepared in the region of Persia. If it be alleged that it was written by MIordecai, a Jew, away from Judea, and in the service of a monarch elsewhere, that is only in harmony with God's method in relation to other books, Ezra, Nehemiah, and Daniel-who were all in the service of foreign kings-having been employed by the Holy Spirit to leave written memoirs of the times and of the events in which they themselves had some share. On all these grounds it is obvious enough that the presumption is in favor of this book being historically true. But we are not left to presumptions of this kind. Many of you are aware that there is a feast of Purim among the Hebrews, observed to this day, with very great care, over the world generally. Now, that feast, it is capable of proof, has been continuously observed from the time when this book purports to have been written. There is no authorization for that feast anywhere in the Bible but in the Book of Esther; and it seems to be impossible to explain the origin and continuous history of that I49 I Thze lActive Pity of a QCueet. feast among the people except upon the assumption that this book is historically true. We are told of the hissing, and spitting, and other indications of scorn, hatred, and contempt that are seen in some synagogues when this book is being read at the feast of Purim, showing clearly enough how real and historical the narrative is to them. But, then, a book might be true and yet not be inspired. And so we have to look at that part of the question also. We know explicitly what constituted the Hebrew canon in our Lord's time, and he accepted that Hebrew canon as the Scriptures. He had occasion to find fault with the Hebrew people upon many a score, but he never did blame them as unfaithful custodians of the writings God had placed in their hands. We know they held this book in such high esteem that they placed it by the law; and there was a proverb among them that there might come a time when all the books would be lost but the law and the book of Esther. Now, if he put his seal upon it and endorsed it, we are constrained to receive it in precisely the same way as we receive other portions of the Old Testament record, as given us by the inspiration of God, and profitable for doctrine, correction, and instruction in righteousness, that the man of God might be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto every good work. But if the name of God be not in the book -a circumstance which perhaps might be accounted for by the consideration that it was possibly written for the benefit of people outside of W5o Thc Active Pity of a Queen. the Jewish kingdom, and that, therefore, it was thought wise to leave the being and attributes of the God of Israel rather to the inference of intelligent men than to explicit statement-it is impossible for any candid reader to deny that the hand of God is in the providences it records. It is a series of providential wonders from beginning to end; and I am not surprised that Dr. Carson, one of the ablest divines of the Baptist or any other church, when he wanted to write something about the particular providence of God, selected this Book of Esther to be the subject of commentary, statement and illustration at once of the truth he wished to present. It is strange enough that Vashti, by an assertion of her womanly independence, should have been driven from the throne; but it is stranger still that Esther, a young Jewish captive maiden, not much above the rank of a slave in the country, should have been raised to the place thus vacated; not, perhaps, to the place of first wife and equal, but to a place dignified by the name of queen. The won der grows when we find that her cousin MIordecai becomes so implicated in her history and in the history of the king, whose wife she has become, that he should be the detecter of the plot against the king's life; that he should be the means of saving the king's life from the conspirator: that he should be in such a relation to the queen as to be able to communicate freely with her when the time of danger came; that he should be, at the same time, the occasion of the scheme for the comlplete destruction of the Jewish people. All I5 1 5Tze Active Pzty of a.Otccn. these things, surely, are matters of very great surprise. Then consider how many things have to combine in order to bring about the result. Had not the king been awake on one particular night; had not the reader turned to one particular portion of the Medo-Persian record; had not attention been called at the right time to MIordecai; had not Esther been in a position to influence the king-any one of these things being wanting must have affected the great result. I admit that one combination of these things might be a coincidence; but I submit, brethren, that here is anI accumulation of coincidences which it is impossible to explain upon any other theory than that, the hand of God is here. 1 would just as soon, by the laws of my own mind, believe that one of our ocean-going steamers had made itself and furnished itself for sea by a fortuitous concurrence of atoms, by an accidental coherence of all the parts that compose it, as to believe that the events that are recorded in this book have happened in any other way than by the designing, controlling, and infinite Mind that worketh all things according to the counsel of his own will; that uses all the complicated forces of human goodness and ot human badness, of malice, ambition, pride, greed, and revenge, as well as patriotism and love of kind, for the accomplishment of his great purposes; that employs even the wickedness of the wicked, and yet that is not wicked, but is most holy, wise, and powerful to the end. WVe need not, therefore, brethren, have any kind of scruple or misgiving in our miinds when considerllg, a 152 The A ciive Pit' of ta uCeen.. passage like that which falls under our consid eration. Esther herself is the central figure through this book, and a very interesting figure she is. Timid fled gentle as a woman, enduring of the repres sioil to which her sex is subject and has always been subject in the East, and yet with strong natural feeling, capable of exerting herself in a very high degree when a strain is put upon her nature, she is cool and calculating when neces sity demands. There is everything about her to surround her with interest, and attract to her miuch of our sympathy. But, best of all, she is not unmindful of that source whence men and women alike have to receive strength, comfort, and guidance-that God of Israel who hears the prayers of his people, and who has taught us that, if any man lack wisdom, he is to ask of God. I. Let us look at the calamity that was before her, in the contemplation of which she makes an appeal to the king, of which this text is a part: "How can I endure to see the evil that shall come unto my people? or how can I endure to see the destruction of my kindred?" MIordecai, a Jew, sitting in the gate of the kinig's palace, had been less subservient and respectful than was expected toward the prime minister of the king. Why he was so we are not told. It may have been that there still remained in his Jewish-heart some of that hereditary scorn with which Hebrews were wont to look upon the Amalekites; but, however it was, his act aroutsed the malice and revenge, and perhaps also 1 5 3 Thle Active Pity of ao Qucen. the greed and covetousness ultimately, of Haman, the prime minister of the king. iHe scorns to take revenge on one man; his burning wrath will be satisfied with nothing less than the sacrifice of a people. So he schemes and plans for the destruction of all the Jews that are captives and exiles in the land. It is no bad illustration, by contrast, of the blessings of our freedom; it is no bad illustration of the evils and powers of despotism that the order for this wholesale murder is given with such promptness by this reckless Eastern king, and that it is put with such promptness into the hands that are to execute it. Esther is made aware, through Mordecai, of what is impending, and she comprehends the whole situation. If she did not, the timely warning of her kinsman would have shown it to her. She adopts the requisite measures; she takes all the proper steps to enlist the cooperation of others; she enlists the religious feelings of her compatriots; she gives directions that all the Jews in and about the place shall fast, which was her way, and the way of the time, of supplicating Almighty God; she engages herself in all this work of calling upon the Lord: "I and my maidens will fast also." Besides, she takes proper means, after approaching the king, of influencing his mind, she elaborates with care and pains all the plans by which it may be confidently expected she will secure his approbation, and be enabled to counteract the devices of this wicked Itaman. That she should have to adopt means like these, thlatit should be inecessary to scheine and plan for getting the ear of her husband, that she should have to resort I54 Thte Active Pity of a QOueen. to these roundabout devices to conciliate his favor, may seem to us, with our brighter light and our happier Western home-life, strange and inexplica ble; but there can be no doubt that, in doing all this, she was acting in perfect harmony with the arrangements of the court in which she lived, and adopting the means, strange and, in some respects, doubtful, as it would seem to us, that were best adapted to accomplish the result and to secure a favorable reception of her request on the part of the king, whose vassal she was. And now, brethren, should we be able, any more than Esther, to contemplate the destruction of our people and our kindred-not threatening nor impending, but a destruction that is actually going on round about us every day and every year-should we be able to look on with unmoved hearts? It is a destruction, I admit, that has come in a very different way and by a very different set of agencies from that by which it came in this narrative. For the revenge and greed of Haman, substitute that love of gain that prompts men to embark in the liquor trade; for the usages of a reckless, oriental, dissipated court, substitute the common social customs of our time; for the destruction of those thousands, be the same more or less, of the Hebrew exiles in the domain of Persia, you may substitute the destruction of the multitudes of men and women, ay, and children, that is in progress continually round about us. When a man tries to take in all the horrid situation at a glance, he is apt to fail altogether, from the very expanse of the dreariness that is before i,15 The Active Pit)' of a Queen. him. It is better, therefore, not to try to take in all the situation, but to fix one's attention upon a limited department of the great waste that is being made by intemperance over the world. Take our own city. We have here four hundred and seventy places in which worship of some kind or another is being addressed to the Almighty among our million of people. I am told-the statement is almost incredible-but I am told that we have seven thousand temples where Bacchus is worshipped with a homage quite as sincere as that we have in our churches, and far more costly to the community, for I am assured that two millions of dollars a year are paid as a simple tax in the first place upon the spiritu)us liquors that are consumed among us. What are tile fruits of this widespread heathenish worship? They are to be found not in the thirty-four thousand people that are taken up in a year for drunkenness and disorderly conduct upon our streets-about onehalf of all the arrests that are made by the police; they are to be found not simply in the eight thousand people that are being kept at the public expense in our prisons, asylums, and hospitals: but they are to be found, dear brethren, in the ruin and waste of life in many private dwellings, of which the police can take no cognizance; they are to be found in the blighting of so many hopes, in the ruin of so many prospects, in the untimely end of many lives all over the city, and all over the land, so widespread are the ramifications of the evil that has thus come to be established among us. There is a way of making this subject I56 The tlcti-,e Pil) of z Q_ultcn. practical to you, dear brethren. Hlow few circles are there into which some loss has not come through this prevalent sin! How few families there are in this church this afternoon that have not been touched more nearly or more remotely through this vice in some one of the circles in which they themselves move, if not, indeed, in their own immediate circle! It is impossible for us, brethren, to exaggerate and overstate the evil and mischief that are being continually done in the ruin of men and womentheir ruin in soul, body, and estate-through their indulgence in the sin of intemperance. In the case of Haman and his intended victims, if he had been able to accomplish his designs, the property and the lives of those thousands would have been sacrificed at a single blow. It would have been a sharp and severe blow; it would have been a thing done and done with. But that is not so with our social proscription that issues in the destruction of such multitudes. It is a long, wasting agony; it is a slow process. The victim dies by inches, so to speak; and not merely that, but he dies amid declining regard, lost self-respect, ruined means, weeping women, and sometimes degraded children. Fires burn themselves out; but this fire has the peculiarity of finding fuel for itself; for how often has it happened that the drunken wife has driven the husband to despair and to cldrunkenness, and how often has it happened that the drunken father and mother have corntmunicated to the very physical nature of their children the diseased and self-destroying appetite! I57 TI,e Actizve Pity of a Qucen. How often has it happened that a family of social position and attractive manners has succeeded in inoculating a whole circle-perhaps a whole neighborhood-with a love of drink! How inevitably does it happen that, when a man has once embarked his means in the trade, his interest and his prosperity will grow with the growing love and passion for drink among his hapless neighbors round about him! Our fire does not consume itself for lack of fuel; it makes the fuel by which it is sustained and upon which it feeds. Brethren, if you think that I overstate the case, you can correct my estimate; but I do not well see how you can correct it, if you have been going through life with your eyes open to the actual facts that are continually transpiring around us. I think you will be compelled to admit that, looking at it in any point of view, not only in a social but in a spiritual point of view, this evil is so gigantic that our tongue gives no words that can overstate its wicked and atrocious characteristics. Brethren, I am not speaking of some remote and distant era; I am not talking to you about the opium-eaters of China; I am speaking here, as Esther spoke before the king, of your own people and your own kindred. These drunkards that are round about, when they become paupers, you must support them; when they become criminals, you must detect their crimes, and then confine and punish theni. And to what cost you are necessarily put in protecting yourself against them! As you take up the Monday morning papers, anc glance over the crimes and casualties I 55, The Ac Pivc Pity of a Qliccn.. of the twenty-four hours that have gone before, and as you look at the poor, besotted, degraded, and animalized wretches that have been suddenly flung into eternity by the pistol or the knife of their assassin companions, you may get a momentary view of the horridness of this tlhing. But you see only a part of it there. You have to look at all its ramifications; you have to think how it affects homes; how it affects religion; how it affects relations to God; how it sears conscience; how it blinds human spirits to all the interests of time and of eternity-these you have to take into account in making a correct estimate of the magnitude and frightful character of the evils intemperance entails. No wonder that any good man, as he looks at this state of things, should say, " How can I endure to see the evil that shall come upon my people? How can I endure to see the destruction of my kindred?" II. Pity is a sentiment. It is a fine sentiment. Sometimes it is a mere sentiment. Sometimes it evaporates in a little sigh; or it distils in a casual tear, and falls ineffectually to the ground. Pity of that kind is worthless; it is worse than worthless, it is mischievous. To have these pities that come to nothing does us harm-they weaken our character; they absolutely corrupt our nature, and they flatter us at the time that we are being good. That was not the pity of Esther; it was active pity; it was practical sympathv. I do not need to rehearse the steps that she t()o;:, and at which we have glanced al I 59 Tihe Acteiv PiJy of a Qaecn. ready, which you can read for yourselves, if you take interest enough in the book to follow its successive incidents. It is enough to say that her aim and object, under God, were realized; it is enough to say that the tables were completely turned; it was Haman, and not Mordecai, that was hung on the gallows; Haman's kindred, and not her own, perished. The decree that he would have to go forth against the Jews was executed against his own people, with great severity I admit, but not with more severity than was natural and common in the times. The wicked was snared in the work of his own hands. Now, my beloved brethren, from the example of this Jewish woman I would borrow a lesson for you and a lesson for myself. I would stir up in myself, and I would urge upon you, practical sympathy and active pity, like that exhibited by Esther. First of all, let us seek co-operation in the war that we would wage with this great vice. Strong evils, many times, can be best met by associated effort. The individual is weak, where the company or the multitude is often strong. There is strength in union, and there is a manifest advantage in Christian people being banded together in societies for dealing with this state of thlings. Information is collected, and then it is diffused; the weak are strengthened; the zealous, who have not always wisdom, are directed, and there is concentration given to the effort put forth. The human imagination-no small matter in a case of this kind-is impressed. I say, no small matter, for in a matter of this kind it is a great thing that a I60 Thte Active Pity of a QO,cen. young man, for example, with principles unsettled, and too weak to stand straight up upon his own convictions, seeing these societies, their organiza tion and results, should be able to say, "I see I can refuse drink and not be despicable. I see I can put away the glass and not be counted mean. There are most respectable men publicly banded together against this thing, and no man dare call them sneaks because they pursue this particular course of conduct." It is something to have societies organized and maintained for the enunciation of right principles, and the organization and extension of effort in this reforming direction. Young men who are here do not despise the aid which these societies can give to you. If you think that you yourselves do not need them, recollect there are many other young men that do; recollect that there are many who have been wounded, and have fallen down, andl they are trying to stand up again, and recover themselves, and they need a great deal of help. It is very lhard for some of them to pass by the door of the "sample-room," the decoy that is cunningly arranged for those who have still left sufficient self-respect to keep them from going to a place that is palpably and indubitably for mere drink. Young men! do not despise these agencies and societies, but go into them and help them along; and if it should seem to you that some of the agencies are not the best, that some of their argulments are feeble, why, do you find better agencies, and put into their mouths better arglttments, and j6r i162 The A ctivc Pity of a -0tccn. work this thiag as it ought to be worked, for the benefit and recovery of your fellow-creatures. MIen and brethren, strong men, do not you look lightly upon these organizations. You may say to yourselves, quite truly, "I have no need to be sheltered and protected in such ways as this." It is true, perhaps, of you, that your characters are formed, and your habits are made; your physical system is consolidated, so to speak; your heads are strong, and you can say to yourselves with perfect truth, and you sometimes do say to others, "I can take this thing or leave it; I can do with it or without it." Then, my brethren, if you can do with it or without; if your minds and tastes are in this state of equilibrium in relation to it, do without it for the sake of those who are in danger tli rough the means of it. Fathers! do without it for the sake of your young sons, if for no other reason. How can you tell but that their youthful steps may trip to that destruction on this side of which your slower feet have been able to halt? Think of them; pity them; care for them. I do not say, deny yourselves, for youL say there is no self-denial in the matter. Then, for their sakes, put that thing away which you cannot but see is the slope down which such multitudes run swiftly into the sea and are drowned. I make my appeal to Christian women, to mothers and sisters. Mlothers and sisters! whom our love and devotion have crowned queens in our homtes, whose influence and whose tastes do so much to form our habits and to determine the T,'c Pithi'e ~ity of a 0)liC/1Z. character of our lives, to whom all manly gallantry accords at least the show of respect and of devo tion, I make my appeal to you. Mothers, your sons may not be in any danger, you fondly think; but there are others with hearts as ten(ler as yours, and they are being broken, slowly broken, by the ruin of their sons. Sisters! it seems to you as if those proud and manly brothers of yours never could be se duced to ruin; but there are other brothers as brave and as manly as yours; and to-day, while I am preaching in this church, they are in haunts of unnamn.able vice, and they are crushing out the lives of their sisters, because they have thus been lured to Qui,.O I make my appeal to you, mothers atnd sisters; if these poor shattered remains of hunmanity co,tld be arranged in rows before you, h(\wv wvould.yotu like to stand up in the presence tf their ml)iher-s and sisters, and say, "I helped to p-rodulce these results. I put the wine-glass to their 1i1es. I made it fashionable and manly for them to drink. I urged them to the begiinningi, of their course, of which this is-God forgiv\e me!-the melancholy and miserable result "? Nor do I plead with you simply on mnan's ac-. count. Mlothers and sisters! this is not a man's sin only; for, as 1 see it, this is a woman's sin too, and in far greater measure than many people are ready to suspect. I dare not trust myself to describe the things I have seen with women, young and tender, and sometimes beautiful, upon whose more impressible temperament and finer organization the destroyer had taken firmer hold, and i63 Thie Active Pity of a Oiiccit. with women 1no longer young, but whose soul and sense were dead long before their eyes were closed. For woman's sake, for your own sister's sake, I make my appeal to you. Mothers and sisters, discourage and discountenance the usages that make it so easy to learn to depend upon the excitement that is given by the kindly glass of wine; and, when you see that wine resorted to to give lost fires to the eye, to give lustre to the cheek, and to give fluency to the tongue, let me beseech you to see in these things unconscious prophecies of the time that shall come when destructive fires shall be kindled in the soul, when the hectic of disease shall burn upon the cheek, and when the incoherent mumblings shall indicate the confirmed and helpless drunkard; and, thinking of these things, I bespeak your pity, your sympathy, your active pity, your practical sympathy. "How can you endure to see the destruction that comes upon your kindred?" Let not the church turn away fromn this thing; let not any one say to himself, "This is a mere platform theme. It is a sore upon the body politic, but it is a sore that ought to be handled only by professional men, and not rudely put before us." Do not say that, dear brethren, when the ruin is so obvious and so dreadful. When men are robbed, and wounded, and stripped in their helplessness in your way, do not make your mnodel the priest or the Levite, but the good Samaritan. Stop, my brethren; come down; do vlwhat you can to lift that robbed and woun-ded man I 64 Tile Active Pity oj a Queetn. who is still your brother, and do what you can in all proper ways to break the power and to scatter the influences that culminate in results such as now claim your pity. How shall the church act about this thing? Had Esther stood still in the safe elevation of a Persian palace, in unthinking indifference about the destruction of her kindred, who would not condemn such base heartlessness? And how is it to be with the church of Christ, his spotless spouse, herself re claimed and won and saved, and lifted up to sit to,-ether in heavenly places in Christ-how shall it be with her if she has no eye to pity and no heart that yearns to save, and no hand to stretch forth relief, when such sin, misery, and wholesale destruction are before her everywhere? So I make my appeal to you, my brethren of the Church. There are queens of society; would that I could make my appeal to those queens of society all - over these United States! I would say to them, Catch the spirit and copy as far as you can the active sympathy and pity of this He brew woman-this patriot of the olden time. \Vhen two weeks bring round the genial Thanks ivintg Day, and when the young and old gather round the family board, ye queens of society, ye queens in our homes, do not put the w-ine-glasF in their hands, do not put the poison ous beverage to their lips. In that clear crystal of pure water, believe me, is betterfar than the w\ine, rosy though it be; for at last it biteth like , serpent, and stingeth like an adder. And wheia thfe New Year's Day comes round. and when i65 Thie Acthl,e Pity of a Qeien. your fiiends are gathered in your parlors, let there be the freest interchange of all kindly good-will; let there be unhindered flowv of soul; but, 0 woman! do not, I beseech you, tempt man again by putting the forbidden fruit to his lips. It may be good-nature and kindliness in you, but, oh! recollect it may be death to him. I can hardly think of any one of the causes that we are in the habit of pleading from our pulpits, the arguments for which have not some application to the case of the intemperate. I can hardly think of an argument for foreign or home missions that has not some appropriateiess in the connection in which I now speak to you. I would have you look with interest upon these temperance organizations, and help :hem. Do not trouble yourself about certain differences of opinion among those who are intent upon reform in this direction. Perhaps from some constitutional incapacity to follow it, I am conscious of a kind of impatience of minute argumentation on subjects where broad and sufficient and unquestioned views exist on which we are all agreed that we ought to act. It is here precisely as it is among men who are seeking political reform. Good men have said to themselves, and I hope will continue to say it to the end, " Why, this is not a question as between one party and another party; it is a question between men of whom we hope the best, and men who are evidently and undeniably bad." One man has one view of the method in which this thing ought to i 66 Tlie' r(/, ie Pity of a iiuen. be antagonized, and another has a soInewvlat irodified viewv; but, brethren, there is substantial agreement among us that the thing is bad, "only evil, and that continually." Let us, with such light, views, and convictions as we have, contend against it, until the causes of the waste and destruction of so many of our people and our kindred be swept utterly away. If there is any people on the face of the earth that ought to be in earnest about this thing, it is the American people. If there is a land upon the face of the earth that ought to be intent upon haviing thiings right in society, in law, and in fact upon this matter, it is this. Only think, with our universal suffrage, your property, your liberty, and, withl our elective judiciary, your very lives, may be bought and sold for rum. In view of the things that have transpired within these y'ears past, I should not have wondered any day if I had seen an indignant and injured community spring to its feet, and say, in the presence of the nation, to these tools of corruption: "When our fathers decided upon manhood suffrage, they meant the ball'ot for mcn, not for imbruted, not for ignorant men, not for savages, but for \IEN.. And we must take care in future that this dreadful power for good or for evil be kept only in the hands of men." But there is no use in plyingi with an argument like this these tools of corrulption themselves. It is from a sphere to vwhich they do not rise; it has to do with interests of whichl they take no cognizance. IMen lwho are lost to all sense of whlat they owe to God and te i67 Thze AIctive Pity of a Queen. mani are not likely to care about great political principles: they are above their pursuits and above their perceptions. I leave this with you, Christian people, for, after all, you must bear the great burden and weight of this great work in the world. You know the value of immortal souls, for Christ has saved you; you know the deceitfulness of sin, for you are continually on your guard against the destroyer. Divine grace has reached you and redeemed you; divine pity awoke its echoes in. your soul, and led you to trust and love Almighty God. Under the influence of that kind of pity, you, Christians, must look upon your suffering fellow-creatures; and, having a clear and distinct perception of all the issues in time and eternity, you can say with an intelligence that others do not feel, "How can I endure to see the destruction of my kindred?" May God help all of us to be faithful in our place, and to exhibit always that active pity and practical sympathy of which the text gives us such a beautiful example! I68 TEMPERANCE AND. THE PULPIT. BY REV. C. I). FOSS, D.D "If the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and tha people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman's hand "-EZEKIEL xxxiii. 6. PURPOSE to preach, this evening, a sermon on the subject of temperance; not on temperance, in the general sense of the word, as referring to all the appetites and passions of our complex nature. I use the word in that restricted sense which custom has put upon it, and the fact that the word has become specific emphatically indicates that the chief of the foes with which this victim has to contend is not avarice, nor gluttony nor amusement, but the intoxicating cup. There are reasons, very numerous and very weighty, for which this theme should be urged on the attention of men from the pulpit. The statement of some of these reasons will serve, I trust, to give to the doctrine of total abstinence the grip of a moral obligation on the consciences of my Christian auditors, and especially of the .7 dY'zn Ip'- the P/ l pit. young men of the congregation, whom I shall more directly address at the close of this discourse. I dwell on this point, not at all by way of apology for the presentation of this theme. The cause of temperance is the cause of suffering humanity and of God. Those men, therefore, ought pre-eminently to be its advocates who are specially set apart to advance the glory of God by preachinig good tidings to fallen man. If I felt that I needed any vindication for making temperance the theme of frequent discourse from the pulpit, I might find it in the fact that 1 belong to a church which has a total abstinence Discipline, and to a Conference of ministers, numbering two hundred and seventy, which years ago resolved itself into a total abstinence society, without a single dissenting voice, and whichl has repeatedly enjoined on all its ministers tihec duty of preaching specifically on this subject. Among the things forbidden by the " General IRules" of the Metlhodist Episcopal Church, immediately after profanity and Sabbath-breaking, we find these wvords: "Drunkenness, buying or selling spirituous liquors, or drinking them, unless in cases of extreme necessity." Siy object in showing you the intimate relations of this theme to the Christian pulpit is to intensify your conviction that it has imperative claims on thle attention and sympathy of every philanthropic man. If it is my duty to help forward this chief among the moral ref)rms of the age, it is your i-o Tl'mcprance and iige P?lpit. duty also. That it is my duty, and the duty of every pastor, who can doubt? If drink, accursed drink, be not a devouring "sword," by which many a wretched, self-destroyed victim "is taken away in his iniquity," then let "the watchman" "blow not the trumpet"; but if it be the archdestroyer of men, even of the strongest, more fatal than the sword of Alexander or Napoleon, then let the trumpet everywhere lift up its note of alarm, and nowhere "give an uncertain sound." I. The pulpit siouitt set itsclf a-aiiist ithe sin of i;temzperazice and the causes of inteiiiperance, because of thei uiinnumbered and itcoimputable evils which flow from it. I will not shlock your sensibilities by a protracted recital of these evils, and, alas! I need not. They are so widespread as to be well-nigh omnipresent; they thrust themselves before all our eyes, and strain almost all our heart-strings. There are btit few families which have not been befouled by the slime of this serpent and pierced by the sting of this adder. If not in the immediate circle of the home, then in the next larger circle of near relationship, the curse has falleni. How many times, in the discharge of my pastoral functions, have I visited homes in which there has been an ominous silence concerning some one member of the family-perhaps a husband, a brother, or a father! By-and-by, without any inquiry, the sad truth which I feared has come to my knowledge. He is a drunkard-a voluntary I7r Temzperanzce atd the Pulpit. victim of that accursed appetite which has wrought more various and blasting evils among men than any other of those " fleshly lusts which war against the soul." Lord Bacon says: "All the crimes on earth do not destroy so many of the human race nor alienate so much property as drunkenness." Take the bald and terrible fact that every year 6o,ooo human wrecks are buried in drunkards' graves in the United States alone; 1,200 psolluted souls go howling forth into a drunkard's hell every week; I70 per day. This annual contribution comes from the ranks of an army of drunkards 6oo00,000ooo strong. But the death of so many inebriates is the least of all the evils of intemperance to the community at large. To the victims themselves, it is indeed the sum of inconceivable woes, the fulfilment of that divine warning often sounded in their ears: "At the last it biteth like a serpent, and stingeth like an adder"; but to the community their exit is a gain. Their loathsome bodies and ruined intellects and corrupted souls were an offence to men, and the hopeless agony of broken-hearted love had long wished them gone. The loss to the co!nmunity dated back long before the final catastrophe, to the time when the hand began to tremble, and the brain began to be clouded, and the freeman began to be a slave. ake the facts, that intemperance in this nation has actually cost it more money than all its I72 TemiperI-an ce oazd the P~ulpit. schools, colleges, and churches, and all the expenses of the government before the war; and that of all the murders, robberies, and other crimes, four out of five are directly chargeable to drink. In Potter County, Pa., where no liquor was sold in I865, not a single case was brought forward for trial at the autumn session of the court. But you must not look simply at drunkards. Intemperance begins long before the point of visible inebriation. Drunkenness is only the sign which intemperance hangs out to the world in its later stages. MIany of its worst evils are produced before a stranger would surmise anything wroi,ng. That heroic man who delivered such telling blows against this sin when he stood almost alone, Lyman Beecher, put before the people, more than forty years ago, these memorable words: "A multitude of persons, who are not accounted drunkards, create disease and shorten their days by what they denominate a'prudent use of ardent spirits.' Let it therefore be engraven on the heart of every man THAT THE DAILY USE OF ARDENT SPIRITS, IN ANY FORMI OR IN ANY DEGREE, IS INTEMIPERANCE. Its effects are certain and deeply injurious, though its results may be slow, and never be ascribed to their real cause. No person probably ever did, or ever will, receive ardent spirits into his system once a day, and fortify his constitution against its deleterious effects." Dr. Beecher also speaks, in the same connection, of I73 Temperance and the Pilpit. that well-known "state of experience when the empire of reason is invaded, and weakness and folly bear rule; prompting to garrulity or sullen silence; inspiring petulance or anger, or insipid good-humor and silly conversation; pouring out oaths and curses, or opening the storehouse of secrets, their own and others." It is now a well established fact that, long before the goal of drunkenness is reached, real intoxication occurs; and there are incomputable evils of intemperance before the tongue begins to falter or the feet to trip. Add to the manifest and disgusting effects of drunkenness, which we must see wherever we turn our eyes, this immensely larger catalogue of the evils which flow from intemperance in its earlier stages; remember that the ministers of religion are called to imitate the example and carry forward the work of him whose biography is written in these five words, "who went about doing good," and that his doing good consisted in overcoming evil, and then tell me whether the pulpit has or has not a mission against the greatest aggregation of evils under which Christendom groans. II. The pulpit should make war on rum, because rum mnakes war on the piulpit. Intenmperance is one of the hugest obstacles in the way of the Gospel. The reign of King Jesus and the reign of King Alcohol are always in inverse ratio. Wherever rum-shops 174t Te'm pcra,znc an/t, i the ]'ii/pi t. are the great centres of attraction, there churches are deserted. The assertion of Paul is proved true: " Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of devils." If the tables of drunken revelry are numerously surrounded, the sacramental table is neglected. Satan has no more efficient batteries planted over against our citadels of virtue, our homes and school-houses and churches, than those temples of his where the incense of XXX ales and wines and liquors perpetually fills the air. He has Ino better infantry and cavalry than the multiform drinking customs of society. As a Christian minister, I oppose drink, because it opposes me. The work I try to do, it undoes. My charge against it at this point is single and simple: it is an obstacle to the spread of the Gospel; nay, it is an enemy which assails the Gospel, and vwhose complete success would drive the Gospel from the earth. The chains it forges are the strongest and most galling ever fastened on the human body or the human soul. There is not a sinner on the face of the earth so unlikely to be savingly affected by the influences of the Gospel as the habitual drunkard. Hie may be a man of delicate sensibility, of lofty purpose, and' of towering intellect; be may have qualities which, untainted by alcohol, would adorn any character; but, if he is addicted to his cups, his destination is almost inevitably the bottomless pit. The salvation of a thorough drunkard is one of the might 17 Temnperanzce acd the Pulpt. iest miracles of Almighty grace. I know men who are frequently convicted of their need of experimental religion, but who are held back friom a single step towards it by the charms of rum. All other fetters would be as gossamer in the way of their urgent longing; this holds themn. MAany poor, broken-hearted wretch has staggered up to the altar for prayer, and cried earnestly for mercy, and reeled away again to drown his sorrows in the bowl which caused them, and vlwhich will aggravate them, until they culminate amid unquenchable flames. So far as the probability of success in the proclamation of my message is concerned, let me go to the brazen blasphemer of the name most dear to my heart; let me go to the forger, who for long years has been using satanic ctlinninig to( defraud his fellowv-men; let me go to the inurderer, who lies in felon's chlains awaiting the execut-on of the law's supreme penalty; but send mc not to the pitiable object in human shape, wvhose spirit is beclouded, and whose flesh is reeking with the fumes of rum. And why? Because his will is enthralled by the direst bondage conceivable. His manhood is in the dust, and a demon sits on the chariot of the soul, lashing the fiery steeds of passion. No possible motive, or combination of motives, can be urged upon him which will stand a moment before the infernal clamorings of his appetite. One of these unfortunate beings (for I know not but they are to be pitied I76 Temperantce and the Pulpit. as much as blamed) once said that, if he were placed in one corner of a room, with a jug of rum in the opposite corner, and a cannon firing balls across the room every instant, he should start for the rum. No other habit has such power. It is inot so with the swearer or the forger or the mur derer. The Gospel can be presented to either of them from a more advantageous standpoint. The truth here insisted on stands out with fearful vividness, if you compare a drunkard's death-bed with that of other sinners. Take the case of one who escapes death by his own hand or by accident (a multitude of them are carried off in these ways), but who stands on the verge of a dishonored grave, brought there by his own excesses. It seems as though the good influences which linger round all other death-beds, as long as life remains in the body, have deserted him. You need not repeat in his ear the fearful assurance that "no drunkard shall inherit the ki'igdom of God." He feels it in his inmost soul.' Hell from beneath is moved to meet him" at his coming. The devils are so sure of him that they cannot wait for the spirit to leave the body. They come up and fill the room. His eyes see themjust as distinctly as they see the terror-stricken relatives that stand around his bed. Listen to a brief account of this dreadful condition, extracted from the writings of one who has experienced it, and has since become an eloquent advocate of temperance: I77 Te17mperarancc a/id /thc Pupit. " Who can tell the horrors of that hornible mala dy, aggravated as it is by the almost ever-abiding consciousness that it is self-sought?... Hideous faces appeared on the walls and on the ceiling and on the floors; foul things crept along the bed clothes, and glaring eyes peered into mine. I was at one time surrounded by myriads of monstrous spiders, which crawled slowly, slowly, over every limb, whilst the beaded drops of perspiration would start to my brow, and my limbs would shiver until the bed rattled again. Strange lights would dance before my eyes, and then suddenly the very blackness of darkness would appall me by its dense gloom. All at once, wvhilst gazing at a frightfull creation of my u'istempered mind, I seemed to be struck with sudden blindness. I knew a candle was burnting in the room, but 1 could not see it-all was so pitchy dark. I lost the sense of feeling, too, for I endeavored to grasp my arm in one hand, but consciousness was gone. I put my hand to my side, my head, but felt nothing, and still I knew my limbs, my fiame, were there. And then the scene would change. I was falling —falling swiftly as an arrow-far down into some terrible abyss; and so like reality was, it that, as I fell, I could see the rocky sides of the horrible shaft, where mocking, gibing, fiend-like forms were perched, and I could feel the air rushing past me, making the sweat stream out by the force of the unwholesome blast. Then the paroxysm sometimes ceased for a few moments, End I 178 TeIImpeCIraice a(td Athe Pulpit. wlould sink back on my pallet drenched with I)cerspiration, utterly exhausted, and feeling a dreadful certainty of the renewal of my torI,,CI]ts." Nonv, with what prospect of success could the misister go to the bedside of such a fiend-haunlted oaan, to pour into his ears the consolations of the Gospel? Far be it fi-om me to say that the occupant of such a bed cannot possibly pass from it to Abr-aham's bosom. I am ready to preach Jesus to any man as long as the blood courses his veins, but I will say I am utterly unable to conceive a case more hopeless. It is not surprising that the great apostle of temperance, who had twice suffered all the horrors above described, should breathe forth, as I have heard him, with thrilling effect, the following prayer: "Almighty God, if it be thy will that man should suffer, whatever seemeth good in thy sight impose on me. Let the bread of affliction be given me to eat. Take from me the friends oi my confidence. Let the cold hut of poverty be my dwelling-place, and the wasting hand of disease inflict its painful torments. Let me sow in the whirlwind and reap in the storm. Let those have me in derision who are younger than I. Let the passing away of my welfare be like the fleeting of a cloud, and the shouts of my enemies be like the rushing of waters. WVhen I anticipate good, let evil annoy me; whlen I look for light, let darkness come upon me. Let the terrors of 179 Tem-peranzce and the Pil/pit death be ever before me.... Do all this, but save me, merciful God, save me from the fate of a drunkard." Now, shall the pulpit, or shall it not, utter its emphatic and reiterated protest against men's needless haste in rushing into evils so enormous? Shall it or shall it not warn the young against those threads of gossamer, which are scarcely felt until they grow into chains of steel, unbearable and unbreakable? Shall it or shall it not jealously guard itself against the assaults of this wily foe? For there is no other temptation which has been so destructive to the character of Christian ministers. God's command to Aaron and his sons was, "Do not drink wine nor strong drink... lest ye die." If all their successors had heeded this warning, religion would have been spared many a severe reproach. What a proof it is of the insidious and awful power of this temptation, that any minister of Christ should be lured on by it to destruction, in spite of all the seemingly resistless motives which cry out against the monstrous folly and sin! His position, his reputation, his family, his church, his Bible, his Saviour, all protest; but the enchanting cup meets him at every turn, and down he goes. Oh! what a fall-fromn the pulpit into hell! III. There is another thought, which makes me feel that this theme should be earnestly and plainly discoursed upon from the pulpit. It its I80 Tenipe-ance and the Pitlpit manifestly God's order that the church should take the lead in every &reat moral reform. Slavery was not abolished, and never could have been, by any band of voluntary reformers, following in the wake of infidels and open revilers of Christ and his church. I once heard from the lips of that silver-tongued orator, whom I never hear without coveting him for Jesus, this declaration: "If all the churches in this country had been sunk through the earth forty years ago, the cause of human freedom would have been further forward." Over against such insane folly put the words of that great, good man lwho guided the ship of state into the port of universal freedom, and whom posterity will call not only patriot, but sage: "The government has been nobly sustained by all the churches; God bless the churches; and blessed be God, who, in this our great trial, giveth us the churches." The mightiest of human forces is the aroused conscience of a great people, and the chief quickener and educator of the conscience is the pulpit. Therefore, "I say the pulpit, in the sober use Of its legitimate, peculiar power, Must stand acknowledged, while the world shall stand, The most important and effectual guard, Support, and ornament of virtue's cause." One great error of the Washingtonian movement was, that it did not ally itself with religion, but often threw contempt upon the church. A I8I Te;miperanzce arid Ihe P?lpit popular and eloquent temperance speaker, during that campaign, said, as he arose to speak at a meeting which had been opened with prayer, " 1 never can bear to be prayed over when I am going to talk temperance." Gough has no objection to being prayed over, nor Dodge, nor Colfax. One of the most hopeful features of the great reform is, that it is at length chiefly in the hands of religious mene, and that its promoters feel the urgent need of enlisting the hearty co-operation of the ministry and the church. 'Christmas Evans, the great Welsh preacher, met with much trouble in his temperance efforts from his brother ministers who were not willing to make the entire sacrifice of their cups. One in particular, Ir. W, of A, was obstinately opposed. Evans prepared to meet him. He polished an arrow, and put it in his quiver. On one occasion he was appointed to preach, and, as usual, there were gatherings firom far and near to hear him. MIr. W, of A, was there also; but, as in anticipation of an attack, he at first said he should not be present while Evans preached; yet such was the fascination that he could not stay away. By-and-by he crept up into the gallery, where the preacher's eye-for he had but onewhich had been long searching for him, at length discovered him. All went on as usual until the time came when the arrow mighit be drawn, which was done slyly and unperceived. "I had a strange dream the other night," said the preacher. "I I l TellperaIice aZnfld the Puilpit. dreamed that I was in Pandemonium, the councilchamber of Hades. Howv I got there I know not, but there I was. I had not been there long before there came a thundering rap to the gate.' Beelzebulb, Beelzebub, yout must come to earth directly.' ' WVhy, what is the matter now?''They are sending out missionaries to preach to the heathen.' 'Are they? Bad news this. I'll be there presently.' Beelzebub came, and hastened to the place of embarkation, where he saw the missionaries, their wvives, and a few boxes of Bibles and tracts, but, on turning round, he saw rows of casks, piled up, and labelled' gin,"' rum,''brandy,,' etc.' That will do,' said he'no fear yet. These casks will do more harm than the boxes can do good.' So saying, he stretched his wings for hell again. After a time came another loud call: 'Beelzebub, they are forming Bible Societies.' 'Are they? Then I must go.' He went, and found two ladies going from house to house, distributing the Word of God.'This wvon't do,' thought he,'but I will watch the result.' The ladies visited an aged female, who received a Bible with much reverence and many thanks. Satan loitered about, and, when the ladies were gone; saw the old woman come to the door and look around to assure herself that she was unobserved. She then put on her bonnet, and with a small parcel under her apron, hastened to the next publichoulse, where she pawned the new Bible for a bottle of gin.'That will do,' said Beelzebub,'no 183 I4Tcmpcrance and the Pulpit. fear yet'; and back again he flew to his own place. Again came a loud knock and hasty summons, 'They are forming Temperance Societies.'' Temperance Societies! what's that? I'll come and see.' He came and saw, and flew back muttering, 'This won't do much harm to me or my people, they are forbidding the use of ardent spirits; but they have left my poor people all the ale and porter, and the rich all the wines; no fear yet.' Again came a louder rap, and a more and more urgent call,' Beelzebub! you must come now, or all is lost; they are forming teetotal societies.' 'Teetotal! what in the name of all my imps is that?''To drink no intoxicating liquors whatever. The sole beverage is water.''Indeed; that is bad news! I must see after this.' And he did, but went back again to satisfy the anxious inquiries of his legions, who were all qzii vi,e about the matter.'Oh!' said he,'don't be alarmed. True, it's an awkward affair, but it won't spread much yet, for all the parsons are against it, and MIr. W,of A (sending up an eagle glance of his eye at him), is at the head of them.'" "But I won't be at the head of them any longer," cried out Mr. WV, and walking calmly down to the table-pew, signed the pledge amid loud cheers.' It remains only to ask what is the general plan of resistance to be employed against this stupendous evil? 184 Tcnizei-ancc and zIthe Pul/pit. I am persuaded the youth before me would be glad to know what they ought now to do, and what they ought to plan for the future against an evil which the most strenuous exertions of our generation will not suffice utterly to abate. I know the heart of a young man. I knowv his jeal outsy of any influence which can interfere with the fullest and most symmetrical development of his mind and heart. I know his generous impulses to reclaim the erring and inspire them with the same noble sentiments which] thrill his ownvi b-reast. Ana with regard to this pitiable weakness and shameful sin of intemperance (for it is both), I now say to every young man before me, " Do tlhy self no harm," and " Love thy neighbor as tlhyself." MIany of the most intelligent, philanthropic, and religious men in the world have been giviug earnest attention to this subject for ages, and especi. ally during the last thirty or forty years. I submit that their deliberate judgments are entitled to great respect. There have been and are among them men of profound scientific attainments, chemists, physiologists, physicians, able lawyers and judges, governors and senators, philanthropists, scholars, divines. They have met and consulted. They have brought to their aid all the discoveries of science, all the principles of human action, all the power of prayer. They have framed their theories, and put them to the test of experience and public criticism, and then have improved them. They have done all this under the solemn I S!. Tempec;rance an'? PIet /pi!. pressure of an abiding conviction that the chief foe to our social happiness and national securit is strong drink. The conclusions they have reache( are that, first of all, nothing but sleepless activit} can carry forwvard this noble reform or save ii from disgraceful and disastrous wreck. They assert the need of contributions of influence from the purse, the pen, the tongue, and the conscience -the four powers which control society. The evil they seek to overthrow is founded on those two mighty forces of evil, appetite and avarice, and has for its chief body-guard social usages and political corruption. The advocates of the temperance reformation are thorotughly agreed in another thing, viz., that tie chief hope and zzdis esab/e condition of the sutccess of thizis ioz'emnizt ies int total abstinecce. Up to this point, I think it likely no person present has dissented from any position 1 have taken. Grant me now a candid heal-ing while I attempt, in a few words, to vindicate this vital principle. I desire to place it on a foundation viwhere you can all stand firmly with me. So I neither affirm nor deny anything concerning several positions which are confidently held by many able adyocates of total abstinence. I do not assert that all intoxicating beverages are essentially poisonous, thlough this is cogently argued by many learned physicians and chemists; and though it is generally conceded that they have no nourishment in them, but are simply excitants. I do not say thlat they are in every instance positively injurious. I I86 TemJe;ralice and the/ Pii/pir. do not say it is a sin for any man, under any circumlnstances, to drink a glass 6f wine. Let the twofold basis on which I nowv rest the argument for total abstinence be distinctly understood: I. It is the only ipe;-soial securit)y. 2. It is I/ie o'ily effective exaimple. Hencce every young man should adopt it as one of the rules of his life, and make it like a " lawv of the IMedes and Persians, which altereth not." Bear in mind the truth already announced, that the sore evils of intemperance begin far back of the point of visible inebriation. The simple item of exposure to disease will serve as an illustration. In Albany, in 1832, there were 396 cases of cholera; all but I6 terminated fatally. Of these, 140 were drunkards; 38 free drinkers; I31 moderate drinkers; and 5 total abstainers. In St. Louis, in I849, out of a population of 75,000, there were about I0,000OOO deaths by cholera-I3 per cent. Among the victims, there were only i0 out of the 2,000 Sons of Temperance there-one-half of one per cent. So total abstinence had the advantage, 26 to I. But I will not dwell on secondary matters. I declare my conviction that total abstinence is the only complete security against the disgrace and the doom of drunkenness. I know how hard it is for any man to realize this for himself. I know how prompt the almost indignant response: "1 have too much self-respect to admit the insiinulttion of such weakness; I can stand." I confess to no little sympathy wvithl such feelings. But let 1 017 Te'iperi-aice and te PlPu/pit. such overwveening, self-confidence be sobered by facts. Who of all the sixty thousand whom drink tumbles into the most dishonored of graves in this country every year ever expected to go there when the cruel habit began? Who of them all did not say, as you and I are ready to say ton;ght: "I know my strength; I have too much manhood in mne to become a slave"? Ah! there comes a voice from the grave of many a brilliant son of geniuls-many a once holy minister of the Gospel-saying to you, young man, and to me: Let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall." I do not hesitate to say that a personal religious experience is no sufficient safeguard against the demon of drink, unless it be girt about with the bulwark of total abstinence. If a Christian plays with a serpent, he may be bitten to death. God promises no miracles. The Sunday-schlool is one of the safest havens on earth; yet from its sacred precincts thousands of teachers and scholars have been swept into ruin by this fell destroyer. The Rev. Dr. Guthrie, in his book on " The City, its Sins and Sorrows," cites many facts, which almost pass belief. I give a few specimens. Among.the prisoners tried at the Glasgow assizes in September, I848, sixty-two had been connected withl Sunday-schools; and of these, fifty-nine admitted that drinking and public-house company had lea them away from the Sunday-school, and into crime. At Launceston, out of one hundred boys in a Sunday-school, forty were overcome by I88 Temperance and thie ~,piit.. drink. " At Ipswich, out of fifteen young men professing piety, and teachers in the Sabbathschool, nine were ruined through drink." Such frightful statements would be instantly rejected if they came on any inferior authority. Tlhey only show the power of the rum-fiend where the temperance reformation has but little foothold. Religious youLth! listen to me. I appeal to you to say wvhetlher if, in the faee of such facts, any man plays with this adder, and is stung to death, his rutin is not deserved? I have one mnore argument. It is one wNhich addresses itself to every noble sentiment and c ene-ro,,s iniputlse of our nattlres. "It is good neithei t) eat flesh [offered to idols], nor to drink -vine, nior a,yt hing wherebr thy brother stumsletlh, or i, offended, or is made wveak." O that stumbl1ing b,(^ther, that stumbling brother! What can I do-) to ise himn? I must not pass him bv. I am my brh-)tle's keeper. It was the first deist and imur-de-rer wvho denied this plainest maxim at once of social ethics and of religion. "No man livet!h unto himself." VWe are each in a network of influence, and our every movement affects others. \Ve are bound to r-ecognrize this fact; and we must share the responsibility of the results of our action. It will not do to say, "If I drink only one glass of wine at a party, my neighbor oug,ht not to be led by my example to drink five, and go home drunk." Very likely hle will be. Yo)u knowv he may be; and if hle is, vlwhat will vou aniswer at the jud-gment-bar? 189 Teifmperance and the Pulpit. The principle is that things not wrong per se are to be given up if our use of them hurts others. This principle mniade Paul the man he was. It wvas the key-note of his sublime career. He was e-ver ready to surrender anything personal for the good of men. "I am made all things to all men, so that by all means I might save some." "I could wish myself accursed from Christ for my brethren." "The love of Christ constrainieth me, because I thus judge that if he died for all, then were all dead; and that he died for all that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves." The same spirit of self-sacrifice for others' good gave Christ his fame. " He humbled himself and became obedient unto death; w.. herefore God hath highly exalted him, and given him a name that is above every name." Oh! if this grand principle of self-sacrificing love to men for Jesus' sake could become universally operative in the church, wvlat magnificent results it would achieve! It would set evernarrowing, bounds to the tide of drunkenness, and throttle the demon of drink; it would untie the purse-strings of many a rich man, and move him to lay all his net income and half his estate on the altar of God; it would loose many a tongue that now finds no words to plead Chlrist's cause with the perishiing; it would make every disciple an unceasing laborer together with God; it would bring in the millennium in our lifetime; it would soon present this world a spotless jewel unto Chlirist. Igo HE EVILS OF INTEMIPERANC~. 'W lho hath woe? who hath sorrow? who hath contentions? who hath babbling? who hath wounids without cause? who hath redness of eyes?'I'They that tarry long at the wine; they that go to seek mixed wine. Loo)k not thou upon the wine when it is red, when it givcth his color in the cup. when it moveth itself aright. At the last it bitetis like a serpent, and stingeti, like an adder.'J'hine eyes shall behold strange women. and thine heart shall utter per — verse things. Yea, thou shalt be as he that lieth down in the miilst of the sea, or as he that lieth upon the top of a mast. They have striciken me, slhalt thou sa,y. and I was not sick; they have beaten me, and I felt it not: whlen shall I awake? I will seek it yet againi."-PROVERBS xxiii. 29-33. EVER in the history of this cominmonwealth wvas there an hour lwhen the subject of intemperance needed a more serious and thlorou,gh consideration than the present. Duritng the last forty -ears lighlt has been poured upon it such as it neve-r lad before. Science, experience, reason, philanthropy, religion; all the powers of the wvise and good have combined in the work of examiining and exposing the enormous crime andc ruin whichl attend the use of intoxicating drinks. The "former times" may have been, in some respects, "the times of ignorance," which God compar-atively " winked at." But nowv that darkness is all past. The true lighlt shineth. No intelli,gent man needs to take, or has a rlight to take, ainy dubious or hlalf-vway viewNs ni)on this subtject. Thlere b* i Ti9e EfZ/ls of J/tci LcP a/zcc. is no reasonable doubt in regard to the crime and curse of intemperance. Its immorality, its historv, its influences, could be made no clearer if written by an "angel standing in the sun." We come to you with no faltering faith or ambiguous words in regard to this matter. We do not say: We thick "-" we bclicze "-" we suppose" that the matter stands so-and-so. We KNOW, We ARE SURE, that intemperance is one of the most tremendouts crimes and cutrses that man ever felt or Satan ever gloried in. Probably intemperance never raged in our country more than now. The devil has availed himself of the present wrectclhecd state of things, as a sort of truce, in which to build up his fortresses anid enlarge his forces withl immeasurable industry and success. Political legislation has generally been in the interest of strong drink. Some reformer-s have grown weary of the struggle. IMen who have stood beside the graves of drulnken fathers, or brothers, or soIns, still take no interest in the temperance cause. In the meantime, the great comimander-in-chief of drunkenness has erected immense fortifications of brevwer-y, distillery, and wvarehlouse on many a hilltop and wharf, and has lined every city street, and every country roadside, with rifle-pits of bar-room and saloon. Never did any other chieftain so sklillfully arrange his forces to sweep every neilghborhlood in all the country from end to end. And what is the commrunity d(:ing all this time? 102 TIhe Evils of Intemperance. More than one-half of them are sleeping or indif ferent, while tens of thousands are continually being captured or destroyed. Among those tens of thousands is an appalling multitude of the young. The cry comes up to us on every side that the young are becoming drunkards. You cani see it everywhere for yourself. In the barroom, in the restaurant, by the beer fount, on the steamboat, in the car, you can see young men drinking, or manifesting too plainly the effects of drink. A few years ago, it was accounted a deep disgrace, and was practised only in secret. Now, it is done openly, as a thing of bravery and glory -the glory of their shame. This state of things calls upon every generous and virtuous young man to take a proper and decided stand upon this subject. If you are radically wrong here, there is tremendous danger that you will come out wrong everywhere. I shall confine myself at this time to one single department of the subject, namely, Thze evils of inltemperance. This is the great basis on which we build our opposition. Our antagonism to strong drink is not a mere sentiment or theory; it is based on dark, dreadful, unquestionable factsthe actual evils-of intemperance. It is to these evils, you will observe, that those sentences of Solomon refer which I have read to you; and what a picture is that! Look at it again. It was taken nearly three thousand years ago; but what a perfect photograph is it of the I93 Th /iz Evils of It teiiipcranicc. drunkard still! His woe - his babbling - his wounds-his redness of eyes-the biting serpent -the strange women-the reeling-the stupidity -the insatiate thirst. Why, it is perfectly lifelike! It has a thousand counterparts every day. I shall divide the evils of intemperance into three classes-namely, Persona4l, Social, and Cizvil. I. In attempting to speak of the personal evils, a formidable multitude appears before me, from which I can select only here and there a repulsive cluster. Let me allude first to (a) The phlysical evils of intemperance. Alcohol is a poison. WVho says so? Science. It is no bugbear of temperance men, as such. Chemical tests, and the witness of men of the highest scientific character, put it high on the list of vege, table poisons. Upon this subject, any number of names and testimonies could be given. Let mo give a sample or two: One physician says: "We hav-e incontrovertible proof that spirit is a poison of the same nature as prussic acid, producing the same effects, killing by the same means, paralyzing the muscles of respiration, and so preventing the necessary change of black into vermilion blood." The name of Sir Astley Cooper is a lofty one in medical science, and this is his testimony: "No man can have a greater hostility to dram-drinking than myself, insomuch that I never suffer any I94 The Evils of Intemperance. ardent spirits in my house, thinking them evil spirits. And if the poor could witness the white livers, the dropsies, the shattered nervous systems which I have seen, as the consequences of drink ing, they would be aware that spirits and poisons are synonymous terms." Another physician says of the drunkard's corpse: "Every tissue proclaims but too distinctly the injury it has received. There are no marks of weakness or decrepitude, as the result of natural decay and advancing age; but all the organs, in accents awfully impressive, speak of poison, of madness, of self-immolation. The anatomist turns away in horror." Such are simply samples of the testimony which men of science give upon the subject. All that is needed to produce death in the case of alcohol as of any other poison, is that one takes sufficient quantity. It is possible, in a single draught, to take enough to kill a man at once; and this has been done. Its effects upon brute animals are similar to those on the human species. Dr. Percy, a British physician, tried the experiment of injecting two and a half ounces of alcohol (about one-third of an ordinary tumblerful) into the stomach of a dog, and the animal dropped down dead very much as if he had been struck with a club. You may tell me that some persons do use spirituous liquors many years, and yet they live. But does that prove that they are not poisonous? 195 Thle Evils of Intemperance. In Germany, it is quite customary, in some places, for the ladies to take a mild solution of arsenic to improve their complexions; and the men sometimes take small quantities pure as tonics, and think they cannot do without it; and these persons may live many years. But is not arsenic a poison for all that? And do not physicians testify that such persons' lives are shortened by such habits? Nature does indeed fight bravely and long to resist and repair the damage of some of the poisons forced upon it, whether by arsenic, or opium, or alcohol; but the poison is there nevertheless, and it does shorten even the longest life, while it cuts the most of its victims down in the very beginning of their race. In all this, I have spoken only of the real nature and legitimate effects of g,enuine alcoholic liquors. But if these things are so with the genuine arti. cles, how much more deadly must be the poison of those vile compounds, colored, and flavored, and sold all over the land under the fictitious names of "brandy," "gin," and " champagne"? Oil of vitriol, oil of almonds, oil of turpentine, lime-water, sub-acetate of lead, sulphate of lead, strychnine, logwood, tannin, fusel oil, and cockroachessuch are some of the delicious elements which help to make up more than nine-tenths of the delightful beverages which young men, and fashionable men, and poor men, and rich men, and all kinds of drinking men, claim as their privilege and I96 I I Thc Evils of hIztcmpcrance. joy to use.'What fine elixirs of life, in which friend may pledge the health of friend! The late Dr. Nott said: "I had a friend who had been once a wine-dealer, and, having read the startling statements made public in relation to the compounding of wines and the adulteration of other liquors generally, I enquired of that friend as to the verity of those statements. His reply was: ' God forgive what has passed in my own cellar, but the statements made are true, and all true, I assure you.'" Professor Draper, of New York, two or three years ago made an examination of the brandy at some of the principal hotels on Broadway, where it was retailed at fifty cents a glass, and in every instance it was a mere compound of villanous poison. I knew a landlord whose "brandy" was discovered to have cost him thirty-seven cents a gallon. I knew a druggist who paid two hundred dollars for a recipe to make these liquors. The liquor inspector of Cincinnati, a few years ago, after a careful examination, declared that he did not think there were twenty gallons of pure brandy in the whole city. If you choose to turn from brandy to beer, I can only commend you to the testimony given in the city of Albany, in the famous trial of Taylor against Delavan-a testimony of facts in regard to the manufacture of beer in that day too loathsome to bear a repetition in the pulpit. Is it not, then, most amazing that we must plead, I1I I97 The Evils of Intemnperance. and so often plead in vain, to prevent men from pouring such disgusting poison into their vitals? Do you wonder that the habitual drinkers of these things should put on such dreadful tokens of disease? Do you wonder at the bloodshot eye, the burning skin, the horrid breath, the bloated form, the unquenchable thirst, the staggering pace, the delirium, the death? (b) We pass now to the mental evils which proceed from the use of alcoholic drinks. The immediate and inevitable effect of these things is to stimulate the brain. The brain being the great instrument of the mind, whatever affects the brain injuriously must affect the mind in a similar way. In some cases, the stimulus creates an increased brilliancy at first, but it is a temporary and suicidal flash, only burning out swiftly into the ashes of an utter ruin. I need not repeat to you here the names of men, once renowned for intellectual magnificence, but afterward degraded by strong drink to the stupidity and loathsomeness of a sot. Every year has its sad wrecks from this cause, in which the state, the ranks of literature, the legal and medical professions, and the pulpit mourn, in sadness and shame, the loss of some of their brightest ornaments. The Senate of the United States has no loftier names upon its roll than those of some who in after-years went down to their graves beclouded or utterly ruined by intemperance, The medical profession has seen, in its own ranks, x98 The Evils of litemnperance. how powerless are the finest genius and most accu rate knowledge of disease to prevent men from yielding to that beastly habit, whose inevitable end is the foulest disease and the meanest death. The Gospel ministry has blushed for shame as it witnessed some of its most distinguished preach ers degraded from their high office by the drunk ard's curse. It has even mourned an instance, only a very few years old, when one of its most gifted and tender messengers of grace was seduc ed, by the demon of the wine-cup, to exchange the sacred desk for a seat on the curb-stone, with a drunkard's tongue belching forth obscenity and oaths. Oh! how unspeakably painful and disgusting is this brutal degradation of godlike intellects WVhat is more horrible in any human being than the vacant stare, the babbling, the nonsensical muttering, the wild and profane yells of the inebriate? What an outrage on a being once created in his MAaker's image! Devils are the synonym of every moral evil, but devils never become drunkards. WVith all their depravity of heart, they keep the intellect clear. This vile disgrace is peculiar to humanity alone. (c) I now proceed to speak of the moral evils of intemperance. Vice loves to grow in clusters. But there is no other vice around which such gigantic clusters grow as intemperance. There is not a commandment of the Decalogue to the violation of which intemperance does not natu I99 The Evils of Iztemnperance rally lead. Try them, one by one, beginning with the first table of duties to God. How is it in regard to the true love and worship of God —the honor of his name-the observance of his Sabbath? Does not intemperance break this table of the law into ten thousand pieces every week? Then apply it to the second table of duties to man, and is it not notoriously the most infamous patron of disrespect to parents, of murder, of impurity, of dishonesty, of lying, of covetousness, Is it not accursed by every law on the statute books, both of God and man-by the whole his tory of human crime? Statistics gathered through several years, both in this country and elsewhere, show that not far from six-sevenths of the crimes committed and brought to trial can be traced to the use of intoxi cating drinks. This does not include that vast world of hidden immorality which reeks with the fumes of drunkenness, but is not brought out to public view. Go to your grand-jury rooms, go to criminal courts, go to county jails and state prisons, go to brothels, go to gibbets, and everywhere you will be confronted with the awful fact that intemperance and crime go hand in hand.. I need not carry our discussion of this matter up to the higher plane of Christianity. It is i(dle to speak of Jesus and his Gospel to one who is wedded to his cups. You might as well preach to a maniac as to a drunkard as long as he yields to his appetite. No man can possibly become a 200 The Evils of InitcCperance. Christian until he first becomes a sober man. A drunken Christian is as great an anomaly as a swearing Christian or a thievish Christian. In speaking of the personal evils of intemper ance, we have now noticed the physical, mental, and moral aspects of the case. There is yet another view more terrible than all. It is: (d) The eternalevils of intemperance. Beyond all the degradation and woes of the present does this dark curse cling to its victim. Not even when the bloated and burned-out body staggers into the grave has the end come. The drunkard's curse lives throughout a dark and hopeless eternity. Be not deceived," says the Apostle Paul, "no drunkard shall inhierit the kingdom of God; " and in saying so, he classifies drunkards along with idolaters, and adulterers, and thieves, and other classes of guilt and shame (I Cor. vi. 9, Io0). It is a noticeable truth that the Holy Scriptures do not speak of drunkenness with that mild and sentimental sympathy which is manifest so often nowadays. Modern humanitarians are teaching the world only to pity crime, not to punish it. In like manner, drunkenness is regarded by this class as almost exclusively a weakness, not a sin. But the \Vord of God uses very different language. There it is regarded only as a crime, which, if unrepented of and unforsaken, will inevitably debai the soul from the blessedness Df everlasting life. It is one of the abominations and defilements witll 20I Thze Evils of Ilteiemperance. whi(cl- no man can enter through the gate into the neavenly city. ! A more brief consideration shall now be given to: II. The social evils of intemperance. If any of you were asked to name that evil which, more than any other, or even more than all others combined. had destroyed the happiness of families; had broken the hearts of loving wives; had blasted the affections, characters, and prospects of childhood; had turned homes of cheerfulness and comfort into prisons of despair; had substituted rags for garments of taste; and had brought every conceivable amount of cruelty on beings of innocence and love-what would you name? How lonlg could you doubt? Would not every man, woman, and child be compelled to say that, of all the curses ever inflicted on families and communities, there is nothing so unmitigatedly hellish as intemperance? It has turned the once faithful husband into a compound of beast and fiend; it has nerved the hand that once gave the wedding-ring to deal the deadly blow; it has inspired the lips that once spoke only of love to belch forth the foulest curses of the pit; it has made children fly from a father's approach as they would from a devouring monster. One of the most horrid sights that God looks down upon is a drlunkard's home, and one of the 202 T7he Ez~iI pfo. Ioftemprac de most pitiable objects in all his universe is a druLnkard's wife. I know not what language to utse to express the deep wretchedness of her lot. Tlhe most terrible punishment spoken of in an tiqutity was that devised by Mezentius, who some timnes put a person to death by chaining to him a corpse face to face, whose putrefaction should gradually kill the living man. I can only think of the drunkard's wife as chained in this way to a loathsome horror; chained for months and years; chained with no hopes of release, save that which the grave may bring to one or the other, or to both. Nor is even that hope unmixed with the saddest fears; for that foul corruption dies not with the wretched forms in which it first arose. The drunkard is the embodiment not only of a crime, but also of a disease, and that disease is hereditary. The most careful investigation has confirmed this fact. Physicians testify that " diseases from drinking spirituous or fermented liquors are liable to become hereditary to the third generation, gradually increasing, if the cause be continued, until the family becomes extinct." Children of drunkards come into the world with the disease of intemperance in their blood, and the marks of it on their vitals. They have been subjected to the most catrefuil examination after death. Dissection and the microscope have revealed precisely the same marks of disease in them as in the confirmed 20'2 i Thle E/~i/s of IntmlICranc/. inebriate. Dr. Riggs, of London, once stated that "one-half of the deaths among children in that city was produced by hereditary inebriety." And what is the case of the children who do not die? Their physical systems are in the same morbid state as that of a reformed drunkard. They may grow up and get along well enough if they entirely abstain. But let them beware how they touch the first drop! There is a latent appetite in them, like the love of blood in the young lion, which the first sip will make ravenous. This explains why so often the children of inebriates become inebriates themselves, and that so suddenly. It is not merely the force of example, but the development of hereditary thirst, which only awaited the occasion of a beginning to spring at once into a full-grown habit. Nor is it only in this form that the disease is transmitted from parent to child, but the delirium tremens, or mental decay, or even temporary intoxication of the parent, often leads to the insanity or idiocy of the child. It is said that this cause produces forty per cent. of all insanity, and fifty per cent. of all idiocy. What a heritage is this to transmit from generation to generation; sometimes overleaping the one immediately succeeding and striking on the third! What a demon of the blood and of the brain must intemperance be, thus to poison the sweet current of life both in the body and the 204 The Ev~ils of If l/elmperanlce. soul! How emphatic the inspired declaration: "\Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging, and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise." III. I promised to say something of the evils of intemperance in its civil relations, or the evils which it inflicts on the state. In no other form of government ought the purity of the state to be a matter of such anxious interest as in a republic like ours. Whatever touches the honesty of the ballot-box or the moral integrity of our halls of legislation ought to be watched by every patriot as the brave and sleepless sentinel watches the slightest token of an enemy's approach. Each of these should be regarded by freemen as almost as sacred as the Sanctuary of the MIost High. Yet how has the demon of intemperance disgraced the legislative halls of our land, both state and national! What deeds of shame have gathered round our ballotboxes! The fearful testimony which comes to us from every quarter is that intoxicating liquors, in the interest of their manufacture, traffic, and use, and in the legislation which they seek, are among the most powerful controllers of our elections. The result of all this is that the great majority of our public men are not sincere friends of total abstinence. Some of them are as far from that "As from the centre thrice to the utmost pole." Jefferson is reported to have said that "no man I! i 205 The Evils of Itiemperzance. ought to be trusted with office who drank." If that rule were strictly applied to many a legisla tive body, there would not be a quorum left. The matter of taxes comes up sometimes for discussion in connection with the subject of intoxicating drinks. Various tables of statistics, compiled before the war, agreed in the general fact that about two-thirds of ordinary county taxes wvent for pauperism and crime, and of that pauperismt and crime six-sevenths were produced by intemperance. This would show that about foursevenths of ordinary taxes, before the war, were exacted by alcoholic drinks. These tables of statistics are, of course, not absolutely exact. With the utmost care, they can only be approximations to the truth. Yet, gathered as they were in different years, and in places far remote from each other, they present a very significant agree ment in the result to which they come. We need, however, no precise details. We need only look at our poor-houses, and court-houses, and jails at the long list of officials, from policeman to judge, whose chief concern is the prevention and punishment of crimes growing out of intemperance, to satisfy even the most incredulous how outrageous is the extortion which strong drink's exacting from the taxpayers of the land. But I am not willing to dwell upon this aspect of the case. The great question before us rises infinitely above the measurement of dollars and cents in our tax bills. So far as the state is con 206 The Evils of Itiemperance. cerned, even if there were no taxes connected with this vice; if it was a source of princely rev enue; if every drunkard's corpse could be trans muted into solid gold, and every dram-shop was a public mint; if the whole cost of liquor in the United States (six hundred millions of dollars a year) could be poured directly into the national Treasury to pay the public debt-even then the state could not afford to encourage habits of intoxication. No amount of gold and silver can be weighed against the loss of public virtue. The question of morals, of happiness, of present and eternal welfare, cannot be ciphered out in tables of currency or coin. No state can possibly become so rich but that, if intemperance generally prevails among its citizens and rulers, every true patriot may well repeat, with anxious heart, the dying words of the great William of Orange: "God have mercy on my poor country!" In the course which I have taken to-day, you perceive I have limited your view to a single feature of the subject of intemperance, viz., its evils. I have endeavored to give you, as far as I could, reliable facts and statements. I have felt that such a course was necessary for every one who desired to know on what basis a strong, reason. able, and Christian opposition against intemperance may be impregnably established. And now I feel warranted in asking you, every man, woman, and child: 207 7i The Evils of Intemperance. Is it right, or is it wrong, to be the patron of in. toxicating drink as a beverage? Is it right, or is it wrong, to encourage the traffic in it? Is it right, or is it wrong, to put the bottle to a neighbor's lips? Is it right, or is it wrong, to set an example, even in a "moderate" or fashionable way, by which a weaker brother or a child may be ensnared and ultimately ruined? These are questions of practical morals which I imagine not a single judgment or conscience now present will have any difficulty in answering. Now, on the other hand, let me ask a few questions of general fact. How does the community practically regard this thing? Is it not under the ban of public opinion? Does not the law crush it? Does not philanthropy exterminate it? Do not young and old fly from it? Is it not quarantined like a ship loaded with pestilence? Do no. men walk far away around it as they do from a yellow-fever district? WVhat is the answer to these questions? The answer is that the horrible monster is caressed and pampered to an extent like this: "There is a sufficient quantitv of fermented and distilled liquor used in the United States to fill a canal four feet deep, fourteen feet wide, and one hundred and twenty miles in length" (_Aat. Temp. Al,iaiac, I870). The National Beer Congress, at 208 Thc Evils of Inic~ipcrance. its session in Newark, N.J., June, I869, estimated the amount of beer manufactured in the United States at over five and a half millions of barrels, and the capital employed, directly and indirectly, at one hundred and five millions of dollars ($Io5,ooo,ooo). The lowest estimate of actual cost ot spirituous and fermented liquors consumed in the United States annually is six hundred millions of dollars ($600,000,000ooo). This is an annual expenditure equal to one-quarter the amount of our present national debt, or nearly two millions per day. Some of this, we know, is used for chemical and mechanical purposes, but the greater part is the deadly drink of infatuated human beings. And what is the fruit of all this? What a harvest of drunkenness and death! It is estimated that sixty thousand go down to drlunkards' graves every year. These represent a quarter of a million of wives and mothers, and sisters and childclren, overwhelmed with shame, sorrow, and often poverty, by the untimely ruin of husbands, fathers, brothers, and sons. But where, my young friends, does this vast evil begin? Always in the first glass. Always in the " moderate use." Always in the hollow soph istry that temperance does not mean total abstinence. Always in the vain confidence of being able to control the appetite and to stop just at the proper time. Of the sixty thousand drunkards who die every year, probably not one expected to come to that end. But the mighty deceitful 209 Thf EL'ils of Inrlmiecral c. ness of that deadly appetite sweeps its victim into helplessness and ruin before he is aware. It was only in the past week that we read the telegram of three men who were drawn into the rapids of Niagara. They expected, of course, to cross the stream in safety, but the current soon became too strong. Their oars were too feeble for the tide. Their boat was tossed and broken in the rapids. Two of the men sank quickly. The third, being an expert swimmer, tried to reach a little island in the stream. He came within six feet of it, but the rushing waters swept him past. In despair, he threw his arms upward and sank. It is the picture of daily scenes on the mad stream of intemperance. So they venture out; so they are swept away; so the most of them sink in speedy ruin; so here and there a resolute one makes a desperate effort to save himself, and almost succeeds; but the infernal tide is more than a match for his exhausted powers; he abandons the effort in despair, and sinks into eternal death. Your safety, my young friends, is to let that dangerous indulgence alone. What is fashion to you? What the bantering of reckless comrades? What even the invitation of female beauty, if it would entice you into the drunkard's patlh? In that sparkling wine-glass there is an adder, and, if you trifle with it, it will sting you unto death even as it has stung millions. Then, when the hopes and promises of your life shall all have been blasted, your habits ruined, your character destroyed-when we shall 210 Thze Evils of liz-emperance, have carried your poor, besotted corpse to the grave, what will it then avail that once foolish companions encouraged you?-once even thoughtless woman asked you to indulge the demon which every day makes ten thousand brokenhearted women weep? God grant you grace, my young friends, whenever tempted to taste the intoxicating beverage, to say: In the name of health-in the name of wealth-in the name of friends-in the name of honor-in the name of virtue-in the name of example-in the name of everything I hold dear in this world-in the name of my immortal soulin the name of heaven-in the name of GodNo! 2II LIBERTY AND LOVE. IMUST express my great sorrow that there is so large a division of sentiment on the subject of temperance, and that this division of sentiment is inclined, in many parts of our land, to take on so acrimonious a form as it does. There are hundreds and thousands of men who not only are themselves temperate, but are anxious to spread temperance principles and practices throughout the community; but they differ as to the measures which it is best to employ. Some men differ as to the number of elements that are to be included. There be many who say that all alcoholic and distilled liquors should be excluded, but that vinous and fermented liquors should not. There are others who say that these last should be included in the exclusion. But there are still others who say that tobacco ought to be excluded. And there are others yet who say that you ought to exclude all intoxicating drinks and narcotic stimulants-tea and coffee as well as the others. Still others say that you ought to go on to vegetable diet strictly, and not take away the life of any creature. It is held by some that there can be no true temperance 0 0 4 -, Liberty and Love. until men become farinaceous. I do not propose to discuss any of these questions. Then, there is a division of men in respect to the measures which should be taken to promote temperance. Some people think that the cause ought to be carried forward by the churches alone, and that there should be no temperance societies. Others think that the work ought to be done by temperance societies simply. Others again think that there ought to be temperance laws-license laws. Still others think that there ought to be laws which should preclude the manufacture and sale of intoxicating drinks. Besides these, there are thousands who think that moral suasion is the only influence that should be resorted to in this matter. There is a great conflict of judgment among men on this subject. Now, in regard to it all, it is a great misfortune that there should be this division of opinion; and it is a still greater misfortune that this division of opinion should lead to uncharitable judgments, and to the want of faith of man in man. A hightoned temperance man-a man who, as it is said, "goes the whole figure," and wants to sweep away by legislation the evils of intemperance-is apt to look with contempt upon the man who, although he is abstinent, says: "I think we had better be moderate, and not undertake any more than we can carry out, doing what we can for temperance by quietly talking in our own neighborhood." And I see that in an adjoining State there is a 214 Liberty and Love. painful feeling of acrimony existing among men who are avowed friends of the temperance cause. I affirm the right of a man to form his own judgment about these things, and to stand by that judgment without detriment or harm. You have no right to take away a man's reputation for tem perance principles simply because he does not come on to your platform, nor adopt your mea sures. You have a right to your views, and you have a right to advocate them: and nobody has a right to take away your peace, or comfort, or good name because you do not agree with him. Discord of views prevails also as to the use of distilled and fermented drinks. First, I affirm and defend the liberty of men to form their own judgments, and thereby their own consciences, as to what is right and expedient in this particular. If a man says: "I have carefully read every treatise, and I have considered deliberately all the arguments for and agaiast absolute temperance, and it is my sober judgment that the use of mild wines is especially favorable to health and to temperance, I say two things to him: " First, I differ with you; but, secondly, I recognize your right to form your judgment on that ground as much as I recognize my own right to form my judgment on that ground. I am not of your way of thinking, and I wish that you did not think as you do; but you are an honest man, and I defend your liberty of judgment and your liberty of conscience." You have a right to judge his conclu 215 Liberty anzd Love. sions; but you have no right to judge his consci ence. You have a right, as much as you please, to multiply arguments, and views, and statements, so as to induce him, if possible, to change his judgment; but so long as his judgment is not changed, he must be allowed to stand upon it; and he must be counted no less honorable in standing on his judgment than you are in standing on yours. Are not these men who differ from you as honest as you are? Are they not as sincere as you are? Are they not as conscientious as you are? 71ho art thou, theen, that judgest another iman's servant.? To his own miaster he shall stand or fall. But now, ori the other hand, while I boldly and clearly affirm the liberty of men on this subject, I have a right, most solemnly and earnestly, to appeal to all right-thinking men as to whether they use their liberty charitably or not. The Apostle puts this argument very distinctly: Use your liberty charitably, amiably, according to the law of love. Your rights are yours; but they are not yours for a selfish purpose. Your personal right or liberty is to be administered under the great charter of love. And I have a right to ask every man to consider attentively this whole matter of temperance in the community in which he lives, and in the day in which he lives. I ask, first, Is there any other single source from which comes so much danger or so much distress as from the drinking habits of society? Is not intemperance the paramount mischief, as well 2i6 Liberty ard Lovze. as the fountain of almost all the other mischiefs which exist among us? Does it not stimulate the worst part of men? Does it not lead to an im mense variety of vices? Your own observation of what is taking place in society at large, and the vast accumulation of statistics and facts such as we ordinarily find in temperance documents, must, it seems to me, have convinced you that the evils with which we have to contend in the community may be mainly traced to this cause. I ask every young man here, and every man of any considerable experience, if he does not know thousands, or if not thousands hundreds, or if not hundreds scores, certainly, of cases of overtaxed business men in our large cities, who have run themselves into absolute ruin by the habit of using intoxicating drinks to keep up their strength and their fire? Has there not been a vein of mischief of this sort running through the business community? I-Have you not seen it? Have you not known men that w\ere discouraged, and badgered, and pressed in their business, who, for the sake of abating their suIffering, have taken away the keen vitality .)f their life by resorting to the cup? And has not til1e habit thus formed finally led to their downfall? s not this going on all the time? Are there not hundreds and thousands of cases, almost in our very midst, of persons who have in some such Wlay- become victims of this terrible scourge? If a ship comes into the harbor with cases of yellow fever on board, there is a great clamor, 217 I Liberty and Love. and we expect that the ship will be stopped, and that the quarantine officers will do their duty, and prevent the infection from spreading to the adjacent shores. And if through any neglect on the part of these officers there are cases on shore, everybody in the city is up in arms about it. Now, I tell you that there are, to-day, hundreds and thousands of persons in our midst who are infected with this terrific fever of drink. Their neighbors know it; their partners know it; you and I know it. It is a matter of common observation. Almost any one of us could put down the names of scores of these men. The habit of indulging in intoxicating drinks is eating out the lives of multitudes of otherwise worthy and most desirable citizens. Especially is this the case in New York, where this evil is aggravated by the conformation of the city. The island being long and narrow, men's business is thrown far from their residences, and they are compelled to resort to restaurants for their noon meal. And here they are brought under bewitching temptations to drink. I think the restaurant system may have laid to its credit more temptation to drink than any other circumstance. Men go into restaurants where liquor is kept for sale. One man opens a bottle of claret, and another man thinks he must. If one is invited by a friend to drink, he does not like to refuse, and he feels under obligation to return the compliment. And the scruple which he lhas against drinking gradtually wears off. Ile 218 Liberty and Love. does nrt know how, but little by little he slides into the habit of drinking. At length he loses the repulsion from it which he experienced at first. And, finally, he finds himself regularly indulging, from day to day, in drinking-not as medicine, but as a matter of luxury or enjoyment. And how many men, beginning so, find, after months or years, that the necessity of indulgence has grown on them, or that a latent tendency in that direction has been fired in them, so that they can not get over it! How many are thus led to pur sue the drinking customs of society through the influence of restaurants in New York! Myriads of young men who are full of blood, and full of fire, and full of imitation, are led into intemperance by the example which is set before them in these places by their elders. I have been informed that there is an immense increase in the drinking habits of what are called respectable young men in these cities. I am told that, quite generally, when an enterprise is taken in hand, they step out to drink; that when they have a fortunate stroke of business, they step out to drink; that they drink when they are going over to business, and drink when they are coming back. There is undoubtedly a great deal more drinking than there used to be. And it means business. It is not altogether drinking from courtesy, or from compliance: it is drinking deep and drinking often for a purpose. And this excessive drinking is accompanied by manifest and growing effects 2I9 i,, Liberiy and Loze. upon these young men. And, from excitability, from compliance with social customs, from the example of the fashionable classes, from the facility with which men are enabled by this means to reach the feelings of their fellow-men, and from a hundred other considerations, the drinking teindencies of society'are increasing. And there is no other thing that so takes down the health, and blunts the conscience, and deadens the sensibility, and prematurely prepares the young for disease and suffering and disgraceful death, carrying terrible blight to the household, and immeasurable woe to many souls, as this very practice of drinking for luxury and for diet. Now, I appeal to Christian men, I appeal to moral, right-thinking citizens, is there any just end to be gained that should lead you to persist in drinking? Have I not said that, abstractly considered, you have a right to form your own judgment in this matter? And now, having guarded your liberty, I ask you, was there ever a case where a man might better bring his liberty to the altar of love and humanity? WVas there ever a case which more strongly appealed to a. man in this direction than this very one? Was there ever an instance in which a man might more appropriately say: If rzeat and drink mnake viy brother to offend, I will eat no fesl and drink no vinze while the world standeth? Have you a right, for the sake of the indulgence of your own pleasure, which is momentary and 220 Liberty and Lovec. transient, to set such an example, and to lend the whole force of your personal influence in such a way as will lead young men into a habit which will be to them damnation? Though you may be cold and conservative, and though you may be so far advanced in life that you can indulge moderately in the use of intoxicating drinks without being drawn into excessive indulgence, have you any right, either for pleasure or profit, to throwv the pall of your example over young men, and solicit them, and ratify their erratic desires? I appeal to you because, though you have a right to your own opinions in this matter, and though I accord to you that right, I believe that you have at heart the welfare of the youing, and that if it were made plain to you that a little sacrifice of personal indulgence on your part would be the salvation of scores and hundreds of men, you would make the sacrifice. And was there ever a case where a man might use his liberty for the welfare of others, if this be not one? I appeal to all men to avoid setting an example of drinking at public dinners or in any public places. Totu may say: "If am going to drink at all, I will drink openly." No, no, no! That is not right. If your physician says you must drink, I say about drinking as the Apostle said about faith-" Have it to thyself." And when you attend a New England dinner, or a Historical Sociclty dinner, ac- a k(eographical Society dinner, 221 I I Liberty and Love. or an), great dinner, do not drink. There are very few men who could sit at the head of the table on such an occasion, as I saw one of the chief and most honored poets of America sit, and press away the glasses, and say to the servants as they came round: "None, none." That venerable man, as he sat there, quiet and unostentatious, was reading a lesson which, I am afraid, but few understood. As I recollect it, it was a noble testimony and a noble example. And I would say to every man who will allow himself to be influenced by my persuasion: I beg of you, in hotels, in restaurants, at public dinners, in public places everywhere, even if you think you have impunity in the matter of drinking yourself, forbear. Do something for the good cause. Do something that will help men. We need an example; and you do not know how many eyes may be looking upon you. You do not know how many men, if you lift your hand with the cup, will lift theirs, and perish. May I not urge parents to consider the effect upon their children of the use at home, as a luxury, of intoxicating drinks? I do not say that a parent shall never drink wine; but it does seem to me that it is wise to have an emphatic understanding in the household on this subject. It seems to me that parents, bringing up their children in the midst of the perils of this day and community, might emphasize their example on the subject of temperance at their tables. I have 222 Liberty a;d Jove. known good men to pour out wine and give it to their boys, because, as they said, they would not take anything that their boys might not take. That is a reason why you should not take wine yourself, but it is not a reason why you should give it to them. And for the sake of the sanctity of the household in this day and in this country, 1 beseech you to think well about this matter. And if with your conscience you have gone over the ground, may I not ask you to go over it again? May I not ask you, as in the presence of God and with the solemnities of the eternal sphere upon you, to carefully consider the subject once more, and ask yourself whether you ought not to exclude wine from your board? May I not say to every one who calls in his friends, and hospitably spreads his table, and opens his saloons: You may be able to stand; but is your conscience or your strength to neglect the weak, the tempted, and the temptable? Ought you not to have a consideration for those whose consciences come under your influence? There is nothing more painful to me than to see how beauty, and politeness, and courtesy seduce. A young man comes to the city from the country. It is a great thing for a young man who has been brought up in a village to come to New York. He is occupying a humble position as clerk in a store. He is a young man of promise; and this fact does not escape his employer's attention. He has been there two years, and has improved in 2273 Liberty and Love. many respects. He is dressing better; he has dropped off his uncouth manners; he has many mnarks of courtesy about him; he has savoirfaire, and many other virtues, and his employer is pleased with him; and on going home some night he says to his wife: " I think Thomas is very promising; he is turning out finely. And 1 do not know as it would do any hurt, nowv that we are going to have these little parties, and as our girls would like some beaux, to ask him over. I believe there is the making of a man in him, and nobody can tell what may happen." He is asked over, and he feels that it is a great compliment. When he came to the city he did not know what was before him, but fortune seems to have smiled upon him. Hie has had pretty hard work, but he has browbeaten and overcome a great mlany difficulties, and things are now going more smoothly with him. And in his exultation he says: " I have got it in me, and I am going to succeed." And then comes this sweet invitation from his employer-one of the first men in the community-a man who stands among the very highest in business circles. And this young man who has been brought up with a religious horror of drinking, and who has been able to resist all the temptation which has been brought to bear upon him in restaurants, in drinking-saloons, and among his companions, goes to the hospitable mansion of his employer, and there in a side-roomi is a bowl of champagne punch (I believe that is ')4 Liberty and Love. what they call it), or something of the kind; and all the other young men go in there to brace themselves up and get ready to be brilliant. It is the custom of the house, and his companions say: "You are not going to take on airs in this way. Besides, you are not going to insult the man in his own house, and tell him that he had no business to put that bowl there." And in an ill-advised moment this heretofore religiously temperate young man yields, and drinks the first cup. Now, 1 do not say that that first cup is going to destroy him; but I do say that he has been grievously wounded. That cup may be of little consequence; but if a young man consents to do what his conscience tells him he has no business to do, he has taken the first of a series of steps downward. When a man begins to act contrary to his moral convictions, his power to follow those convictions in the midst of temptation is materially weakened. And when you, by your example in the household or elsewhere, lead a man to do that which his conscience condemns, you have done him an injury from which he can never wholly recover. So take care that you do not destroy men by your example. I beseech of you who are looking forward to the approaching festive season of the holidays-Christmas and New Year's Day-to take high ground on this subject of temperance. I make my annual solemn and affectionate appeal to every young man in this congregation, to maintain a conscience void of offence. If your conscience says that 2 2 Liberty and Love, drinking is bad, and ought not to be allowed, stand by your principles, no matter if you be tempted by an angel of light, with a devil ini him. I make my appeal, also, to every young woman. Since drunkenness comes first and hardest upon woman, since it is to her what a swine is to a garden, rooting up every sweet blossom, and destroying every fruit, and making a wilderness of the garden of the Lord, I have a right to say to every young woman: By your look, by your word, and by your act, bear testimony and exert your influence against intemperance. Let not your fair hand, that yet one day shall go out in pledge, convey to another that cup which shall desolate and destroy the household. If there be one thing that woman should stand for, it is temperance. I beseech of you who are hospitably disposed, whatever have been your old customs, your Old World customs, or your old country customs, think this matter over again. Men, brethren, fathers, you who have never thought of taking this ground, am I unreasonable? Have I not put your liberty on the right ground, and defended it? and am I wrong in begging you to use that liberty so as not to destroy men with it? May I not beg of you now, many of you, before you leave this house, to say: "By the help of God I will use my reason, I will use my conscience, I will use my money, I will use my house, 1 will use my table, so as to make sure that no man shall stumble upon my example and end in destruction " 226 THE WINE OF THE WORD, AND THE WORD CONCERNING WINE. "All things indeed are pure; but it is evil for that man who eateth with offence."-ROM. sxv. 20. NE of the questions of the hour is the wine question. On its settlement hangs the use or disuse of all light alcoholic stimulants; and whether these shall be banished from the sideboard, the dining-table, and the circles of social and festive life, will go far to settle the status of the temperance cause, and its success in staying the monster evils that come from indulgence in the more fiery liquors. It will go far to settle the temporal and eternal welfare of tens of thousands, many of whom are growing up in Christian homes and in attendance upon the church of God. If the Christian conscience cannot be secured on the side of abstinence, we must despair of securing the worldly conscience. If over the wine-cup and other intoxicants men stumble to perdition, and the practice of God's people is nevertheless in favor of the wine-cup, then men will continue to stumble to __0 T,'re U; of the WVord, the end of time. With a drinking church behind us, we can do little or nothing with a drinking world before us. The ruin from intemperate drinking can scarcely be overestimated. There is no such other one source of woe and crime in the world as the excessive indulgence in alcoholic drink. And this excess of indulgence comes in a vast majority of cases from indulgence in moderation. There is that in the very nature of alcohol which tends to excite thirst for deeper draughts of it. If we stop the moderation, therefore, we are sure of arresting a large amount of the excess. If we lend our influence and example to moderation, effort to prevent excess will be largely spent in vain. There are thousands upon thousands who are weak, of excitable temperament, easily tempted, strong passioned, and to whom moderation in the use of alcoholic stimulant as a beverage would almost inevitably lead to dissipation and ruin. These ought to abstain entirely, all will concede. But do not those who love Jesus Christ, and who profess to be actuated by the Gospel law of love, owe a duty to them that are weak? Are we not bound to help them to abstain both by our precept and by our example? Should example and, therefore, approval be given to a practice that, though possibly not sinful in itself, is known the world over to be a stumblingblock and an occasion to fall for multitudes? And if so given, will not the multitudes keep on perishing? Surely, therefore, this wine question is of 2,210 andtI t!,le Yord conccrnilz I Vzig incalculable consequence. And the right settlemient of it must begin at the house of God. WVhat is the great law by which God's people should be governed in this matter of wine-drinking? Some assert their Christian liberty, and say, ',There is no sin in drinking a glass of wine. It is of no personal harm. It is lawful, therefore I will drink it." Now, the apostle distinctly recognizes, in the fourteenth chapter of his Epistle to the Romans, this law of liberty. And in view of it he makes some frank and manly concessions. He says Christian liberty may be freely exercised with reference to all those things that, in themselves considered, have no permanent moral ground for their prohibition; in other words, things that are not in their essential character either right or wroing. Speaking of meats and drinks, and holydays and ceremonies, his noble avowal is, "I know and am persuaded of the Lord Jesus there is nothing unclean in itself," i.e., there is no essential moral pollution in any of these things. Participation could be had in them without contamination. To touch them is not necessarily to besmear ourselves with the pitch of sin. But, he adds, take heed how you use your liberty. There is a higher law of love which limits the law of liberty, and this law of love has a law's obligations just as binding as those of any 1wv on God's statute-book. Under this law, a thing in itself lawful becomes not only not expedient, but it ceases to be lawful, and becomes a ~-29 I The ['Vize of the lVord, sin-a double sin-a sin against a brother, and a sin against Christ. The law of love as laid down by the apostle demands" that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother's way." It is not right, he says, to eat flesh or to drink wine, or to do anything whereby a brother stumbleth. All things indeed are pure, but it is evil (KaK6v, not merely hurtful, but wrong, evil in a moral sense, sin) for that man who eateth with offence, i.e., so as to be an occasion for a brother's fall. Liberty to do that God never gave any man. It is not, therefore, by the unauthorized dictum of a church court, or by the unreasoning zeal of an enthusiast in temperance reform, that the liberty of Christ's people is sought to be restrained. God himself, by his unmistakable Word, undertakes to restrain it. Hence, if there be any impeachment of the divine wisdom in this matter, as has been charged, it is by those who advocate a liberty which God has expressly denied. Now, there are those who recognize and acknowledge the sinfulness of so using our liberty of action as to injure our fellow-men, yet whose reasoning on this wine question seems to be in favor of the largest liberty. They argue that the Scriptures authorize the use of wine and other fermented drinks, provided they be used within the limits of strict sobriety. And they say these are the limits allowed of God, and this is the liberty given to every man. It is asked, "If God permits a man 230 anid the [Vord coizccrft~izg TVine. to use alcoholic drinks temperately, who will dare take upon himself to say that he shall not do so?" And it is argued that to press the obligations of law here is to take away that liberty which God has given whereby every man to his own master standeth or falleth. This seems like putting the whole grand doctrine of Christian expediency within the domain of a divinely allowed liberty, which is simply to take wholly away from the law of love its grip of oughtness, and to sink it to the level of a thing indifferent of his duty in respect to which every one must judge for himself." But in this matter God has taken judgment out of our hands. He says the violation of this law, or the imperilling a weak brother in the exercise of our liberty, is a sin. When it comes to that, no man has a right to judge for himself. His drinking wine, then, is not "a simple question of expediency." He is brought face to face with "an offence against Christ," and what liberty has he for that? Not any, it certainly would be fair to conclude, that any Christian man would care to maintain. This, then, is the great law. A thing pure is evil for that man whose indulgence is an injury to others. It is morally wrong to put an occasion to fall in a brother's way-a Christian sins against his Lord when he so uses his liberty that it becomes a stumbling-block to them that are weak. Thus every man is clinched with a moral obligation-bound by an imperative "ought." It is not a matter of 231 Y'he Wine of the ['Vo-d, li)berty at all. It is a matter of' law and a lawv's obligations. Because the law pertains to a thing indifferent-ie., neither right nor wrong per seobedience to the law is not a thing indifferent, but a clear and demanded duty. Now, on the supposition that wine-drinking is not wrong in itself, does this law of love bind us to let the wine-glass alone? Is abstinence fromn all alcoholic beverage a Christian duty? By some it is emphatically answered, "No! God has clearly and repeatedly, from end to end of his Holy Word, by precept and example, authorized, approved, and sometimes even enjoined, the use of intoxicating wine and strong drink as a beverage." Through column after column of our public prints, men have recently labored to prove this-to prove that such wine is the only wine of Scripture; that God directed the Jews to indulge in its use at their religious festivals; that Christ made this intoxicant in large quantity at a marriage feast; that he freely drank it on various occasions. And all this tremendous sweep of argument and wholesale Scriptural endorsement of wine-drinking has been accompanied and modified by only this mild disclaimer: "It may be one's duty, notwithstanding the truths here set forth, to abstain in given circumstances from all use of wine and strong drinks." This is certainly very softly put, as if even this were a doubtful matter. And doubtful it is if the above Scriptural argument be true. 232 anzd the H4ord conzceriinig Vinse. Doubtful it is if God has so often, and so publicly, and in such variety of circumstances, sanctioned the use of the intoxicating cup. Once admit the argument, and the mild disclaimer is swept to the winds. " It may be one's duty in certain circumstances to abstain!" In what circumstances? Try to conceive of any that could call for abstinence more imperatively and bindingly than those in which the fearful woe was pronounced upon Ephraim for drunkenness, and when all Judah "erred through strong drink," and priests and prophets "were swallowed up of wine." Such a state of things has no parallel even in this day of dissipation and excess. But it was not only then that men stumbled so fearfully by wine. From the time that Noah drank of the wine and was drunken, the brink of the wine-cup has been the brink of ruin. Hundreds of thousands have been swept to perdition by the alcohol of the cup. It is not Luy any means a desolating and dreadful ruin peculiar to our own day and land. The woe and the curse of this thing scarred Israel all along her history, and the record of Israel's folly is heavy with the sounding retributions of God for it. Drunkenness was a common sin in the time of Christ. So he warned his disciples, saying: "Take heed lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with drunkenness." And at the wedding in Cana, the governor of the feast, speaking of the general custom of such feasts, said: " Every man 23I Thze TWine of the Word, at the beginning doth set forth good wine, and when men have well drunk "-drunk freely, to inebriation-" then that which is worse." Here is proof of the habit of excess at feasts, whether true at Cana or not. So "drunkenness and revellings" are among the works of the flesh named by Paul, and he enjoins the saints at Rome not to walk "in rioting and drunkenness." He counsels the Corinthians to avoid the company of the drunkard, thozugz he be called a brother. Among gross offenders he names drunkards, adding," Such were some of you." In almost every letter he wrote, he sounded out some warning against the sin of drunkenness. And Peter, too, recognizes the prevalence of the evil, and speaks of the saints to whom he wrote as having in the time past of their life " walked in excess of wine, revellings, and banquetings." These passages certainly prove the commonness of intoxication in the East in the time of Christ. And as distilled liquors were unknown, the intoxication must have been largely from wine. Now, we are asked to believe that God gave his sanction to the use of alcoholic wine and strong drink in all these circumstances-that his personal divine warrant for drinking intoxicating liquors was given publicly, repeatedly, at various times and in various conditions-given to a people who were swept to the fearfullest excesses of intoxication, so that the Word of God says even their priests and prophets reeled and staggered 234 and thze Word concernizg Weine. through strong drink, erring in vision and stum bling in judgment. And it was not a divine per mission simply because of the hardness of their hearts; but it was a clear and repeated divine sanction, God approving the use of alcoholic wine and directly enjoining it, and this, too, when the same terrible excesses accompantied its use as now/ We are asked to believe, also, that the Saviour made the intoxicating beverage on a public fes tive occasion, and drank it and sanctioned its use, when it would be known all over Judea and all over the world that he did it-made it for guests who had already indulged freely, and who were " well drunk" (whether to satiety or to inebria tion, it matters not)-made a deceiver, and placed it before men for their free use, knowing it to be a constant and fatal lurer to ruin, having in its very nature as an intoxicant the element that gives it its deceitful power, and which God had therefore solemnly called "a mocker." If this be all true, where, then, are the circumstances in which abstinence for the sake of others may be one's duty? I say it, fearless of sustainable contradiction, they are not conceivable. Here is a liberty given again and again of God, in the very circumstances in which it is said we oiught not to exercise it! But surely, if God approved and enjoined the use of the fermented juice of the grape, and told his people to drink it openly and publicly within the limits of sobriety, notwithstanding the frequent and sometimes awful prevalence of 235 Thze /ifinie of the WVord, rntemperance among them, and even though the consecrated stewards of religion tripped and stumbled and were swallowed up of wine, we need not be afraid to go and do likewise. If Christ used alcoholic wine and gave it to others to drink, we need not be afraid to follow his example. So will reason every wine-drinker in the land. So, I grieve to say it, they do reason. They welcome and applaud the efforts made to prove that the Bible sanctions the use of alcoholic wine and strong drink, and that there is no ground for the division of the wines of Scripture into intoxicating and non-intoxicating. They placard their saloons with "the wine of expediency," and they quote the Biblical endorsements with an ill-concealed gratification. They say, and they have a right to say, "If this be true, the divine warrant and the divine example in the recorded Scriptural instances leave us at full liberty to use wine in any circumstances, little or much, habitually or occasionally, provided we use it within temperate limits." They laugh at the talk of possible circumstances calling for abstinence. Panoplied about with the Scriptural argument, they are bomb-proof. They are fortified and upheld in their moderate drinking by all such logic, and all the "grip" of obligation is utterly gone from the Christian doctrine of expediency in its application to the wine question. But rather than lose the clinch of this great law of love, where, certainly, if anywhere in the wide 2236 and lite Utord concernzn, 1Vi.,c.e world, and concerning any one thing, application should be made of it and men's consciences should be bound by it, let us see if something cannot be said in favor of the division of the wines of Scrip ture into intoxicating and unintoxicating. We are told that "the reasoning by which such a di vision is sought to be established is perfect/y ab surd." Let us hazard the absurdity. The point is worth the risk. "Wine is a mocker." This is God's word. No one doubts that the reference here is to intoxicating wine. Why is it called of God a mocker? Surely not because when used to excess it is hurtful. Beef is hurtful when used to excess. Is beef a mocker? We must all be agreed, I think, that wine is a mocker because of its inherent quali/y-a somzethinc in tze wine itself, by which its users are lured into excess. A thousand other things are occasionally used to excess, but the use of intoxicating wine, frequently, naturally, and, alas! often fatally, leads to excess: the tendency is that way. Somehow the current sets in the direction of overindulgence, and so seductive and subtle is this tendency that some of the noblest and the best of men trip and stumble before they are aware. This is the mocker power of wine-this power of deceit -which is in the very nature of alcoholic wine as an essential element. It gradually wakens desire in a man as indulgence goes on, until he and the desire change places, and he is no longer the master of the desire, but the desire is master of him. 2 ") 7 I The Wi'ie of the Word, Therefore, of this mocker it is said, "Whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise." So it deceived Noah when he drank of the wine and was drunken. So it deceived Ephraim and Judah, priest and prophet, when they were swallowed up of wine. tHence the Scriptural injunction," It is not for kings to drink wine, nor for princes strong drink, lest they drink, and forget the law, and pervert judgment "-words that mark and prove a liability, a proneness, a natural tendency. Hence, also, the command, "Look not upon the wine "-when? "When it is red, when it giveth its eye and goeth down smoothly." The very quality is here described that gives to wine its deceitful power. These are signs of the presence of alcohol. No one doubts that alcoholic wine is here referred to; and it is this kind of wine that we are solemnly commanded not to look upon, for this kind is a mocker. The insidious subtlety and venomous guile of the "serpent" are in the mixture, and at the last it giveth the serpent's "bite." Now, is this the wine used to symbolize the feast prepared by divine wisdom, and to which the Son of God invites the church, saying," Eat, O friends, drink, yea, drink abundantly, O beloved "? A wine that deceived and disgraced Noah, that swept a whole nation, including its holy men of God, into the sin of intemperance, that kings and princes are forbidden to drink lest they pervert judgment-is this what Christ summons us in figure to drink "abundantly "-a mocker, a decei 238 and the IH7ord conccrniiig,, Viiie. ver in its essential nature, and because of the in toxicating element in it? Is this thie kind of wine that the Jews were enjoined to drink freely as an act of worship before the Lord in the temple? Is this what Jesus made and gave freely to others the very same wine so minutely described by the Word of God as giving its eye and moving itself aright, a mocker, with the bite of a serpent and the sting of an adder? Surely the proof must be overwhelming, and there must be no alternative consistent with the Word of God, before we can believe that. It is not a question, you see, as to the use of wine as an emblem, whether of mercy or of wrath. The gravelling difficulty is, Would God call a thing a mocker, and then press the mocker to men's lips? Would he tell men not to look upon it, and then give it to them to drink? I grant this is yet only presumptive and inferential as to two kinds of wine. But what might there is in it! How naturally and inevitably, in the absence of proof either way, the presumption and the inference carry both our judgments and our hearts. Who that loves Christ does not desire that this may be true? Now, what if there is another kind of wine spoken of in the Word of God that cannot possibly be intoxicating-where fermentation and the consequent presence of alcohol are out of the question -what then? Why, is it not reasonable and consistent, the demand alike of common sense and common conscience, to regard this as the wine 239 Tlze lVine ofj the IVeorc, commended in Scripture as a blessing, making glad the heart of man? To the law and the testimony. God, threatening Moab with desolation, said (Isaiah xvi. Io): "In the vineyards there shall be no singing and shouting: the treaders shall tread out no iuine in their presses. I have made their vintage shouting to cease." And again (Jeremiah xlviii. 33): "I have caused wine to fail from the wine-presses; none shall tread with shouting." Again: Gedaliah, made governor by the King of Babylon over the cities of Judah, thus commanded the Jews (Jeremiah xl. Io): " Gather ye wize and summer fruits and oil, and put them in your vessels." And the record is, "They gathered wine and summer fruits very much." The Bible also speaks of "presses bursting with new zwine," of wine found in the cluster;" and it says of this wine, and of this only, and in this very connection, "A blessing is in it." Here, then, is frequent reference to the pure, unfermented juice of the grape, just trodden out of the presses, just gathered for the vintage, even found in the cluster. And here this ga raje-z ice is repeatedy, and by i/e yews themselves in their own Scriptzres, callcd WINE, both yayin and tirosh. Now, by no possible device of reason or fetch of logic can this be made the wine that is "a mocker." Wine fresh from the cluster or the press mocks or deceives no man. The guile of the serpent has not yet entered it, for alcohol 24to and the Word concerning Wine. requires time and a process for its formation. It is the simple, unfermented juice of the grape, just as cider, right out of the press, is the simple, un fermented juice of the apple; and as such, God says a blessing is in it. Here, then, is the Scrip tural distinction between wine and wine. It is not made to suit a modern exigency. God's Word makes it. Is it only "a hair-breadth" distinction? Is there nothing more than that between "a blessing" and "a mocker"? Each was called wine by the Jews, because wine (yayin) Ys a generic word applied to the juice of the grape in all conditions, whether sour or sweet, old or new, fermented or unfermented. But it is still held that "the word wine, unless used figuratively or qualified by some other word or phrase, always means the fermented juice of the grape." How do we know that? There are, indeed, passages where the case is clear, the context plainly showing that the wine spoken of is intoxicating. There are other passages, such as those quoted above, where the case is equally clear, the context plainly showing that the wine spoken of is unintoxicating. There are still other passages where God approves of wine and sanctions its use, with no proof whatever that the wvine is intoxicating but the bare word. What else than "perfectly absurd" reasoning is it that would carry all these passages bodily over to the side of fermented wine? Why must we hold that intoxicating wine is necessarily meant in all such cases? Without the shadow of a shade of 24r l1l Thle WVine of the [Vord, proof, must God's approval be tied, riolens volens, to the i't/oxicating vit'aniing of a doubtftl word? Common sense is affronted at the suggestion of any such reasonless necessity. The origin and, therefore, the original meaning of yayin is in dispute.. Philologists are not agreed as to its derivation. Some half-dozen possible roots are assigned it. Parkhurst, in his old Lexicon, says it is from a Hebrew word signifying "to press, squeeze; as being the expressed juice of grapes." Dr. Ralph Wardlaw says the word is from a verb signifying to press or squeeze. Webster gives a similar derivation. There is not one philological reason, therefore, why we should hold that the word 3ayin means an intoxicating wine unless it is otherwise stated. There are abundant moral reasons why we should not so hold. The word is certainly applied to unintoxicating wine, was so applied by the Jews, and the proof of it is the Word of God. To such wine, unmistakably such as shown by the context, divine commendation is expressly given. When the same word is used elsewhere, coupled with the same divine sanction, we are bozund to believe the same wine is vmeant unless it is otherwise stated. Let one thing more be now proved, and the whole case is too clear for question. Were the ancients in the habit of using the unfermented juice of the grape, which they called wine, and did they understand the art of preserving it free from fermentation? The admissions of those lwho, 242 and the YVord concerninig Wi;ze. nevertheless, claim a Scriptural endorsement for the use of intoxicating wine, are sufficient and conclusive answer. The article in Smith's "Bible Dictionary" on wine says: "Sometimes it" (wine) "was preserved in its unfermented state, and drank as must."... "It may be at once conceded that the Hebrew terms translated'wine' refer occasionally to an unfermented liquor; but, inas much as there are frequent allusions to intoxica tion in the Bible, it is clear that fermented liquors were also in common use." Dr. Maclean, in the Repertory for I84I, says: "That, in treating of wines, these" (classical) "writers have men tioned modes of preserving the juice of the grape other than by fermenting it, we without the least hesitation admit; and that this unfermented juice, whether inspissated or not, was sometimes used as a drink, we do not question." Rev. Henry Holmes, missionary at Constantinople, says ("Bibliotheca Sacra," May, I848) of the boiled juice of the grape, which he kept for two years without its undergoing any change: "Here is a cooling grape liquor which is not intoxicating, and which, in the manner of making and preserving it, seems to correspond with the recipes and descriptions of certain drinks included by some of tze ancients under tzhe appellation of wine." Dr. Laurie, in the " Bibliotheca Sacra," while contending that all the wines mentioned in Scripture were fermented, nevertheless admits we can " find traces of an unfermented wuine in a few classical writers." 243 Thze WVine of the Word, Now, some of these concessions are perfectly clear with reference to the preservation and use of the unfermented juice of the grape among the ancients, and others are just as clear with reference to the application of the word wzine to this unfermented liquor. Taken together, therefore, they constitute the very best evidence of the only point that remained to be established, viz.: Did the ancients preserve and use unfermented grape-juice, and call it wine? For they are admissions forced by classical and historic record for those who stoutly controvert the position that there are two kinds of wine, intoxicating and non-intoxicating, mentioned in the Word of God. And how could these concessions be honestly avoided in the face of the following, among other, evidences of ancient usage? Aristotle says of sweet wine that "it is a wine in namze, but not in fact-it does not intoxicate." It had the name, therefore, even in his day. Josephus, the Jewish historian, paraphrasing the dream of Pharaoh's butler, who dreamed that he took clusters of grapes, and pressed them into Pharaoh's cup, and gave the cup to Pharaoh, repeatedly calls this grape-juice wine. Bishop Loyvth, 1778, in his "Commentary" (Isaiah v. 2), says, "The fresh juice pressed from the grape" was by Herodotus styled oinos ampelinos, i.e., wine of the vine. The ancient custom of squeezing the juice of grapes into a cup has had corrobation in a figure 244 and the Word concernzing Wine. of Bacchus exhumed at Pompeii, represented as thus engaged. Pliny, book xiv., speaking of a wine called Aigleuces, always sweet, gives this method of pro ducing it: "They plunge the casks immediately after they are filled for the vat into water until winter has passed away, and the wine has acquired the habit of being cold." Columella says, book xii., "That your must may always be sweet, thus proceed," and he then gives the process of putting it into a new amphora, carefully excluding the air, and placing it in cold water for a month or six weeks, when it will remain sweet for a year. Athencus says, vol. i., book i.: " They often used boiled wines." Virgil, in his Georgic, book i., refers to this boiling process, the object of which was to concentrate the wine by evaporation, and so prevent fermentation. Alexander translates this line in Virgil: " Or with the fire boils away the moisture of the sweet wine." But why multiply proof of a position which Anthon, in his Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities," Archbishop Potter, in his " Grecian Antiquities," Smith, in his" Dictionary of the Bible," and many other scholars of acknowledged competency, confirm and support? Moses Stuart, that prince of philologists, says: "Facts show that the ancients not only preserved their wine unfermented, but regarded it as of a higher flavor and finer quality than fermented wine." There were, therefore, two kinds of wine in 245 Thze Wine of the Word, ancient use. The one was sweet, pleasant, refreshing, unfermented. The other was exciting, inflaming, intoxicating. Each was called wize. How natural, now, to say of the one, A blessing is in it, and it maketh glad the heart! How natural to say of the other, Woe and sorrow are the fruit of it-it is a mocker! There is no difficulty now in the reconciliation of Scripture with Scripture. The Bible is not a wholesale endorsement of the use of the intoxicating cup. It puts no weapon into the hands of the wine-drinkers. And the binding obligations of the law of love in its application to the wine question may be pressed home upon the conscience and the heart, unweakened by any opposing plea of divine precept or example. I do not believe that the drinking of wine is a sin per se. I do not believe that a church court should make it a matter of discipline. But I do believe that the Christian who is known by precept or practice to be an advocate of the use of the cup takes upon himself a fearful responsibility. The effect of such precept or example is felt far beyond the circle of those with whom such Christian comes in contact. The higher the position of the man, the wider will be the influence of his word or deed. And influence and responsibility go together. Wherever he is known as an advocate of the use of wine and strong drink, his influence is felt as such. And who is gifted with the power to see and say whether, among the 246 and the WVord concernin6t Wiie. thousands yearly swept to ruin by alcohol, there may not be those to whom his example has been a stumbling-block, on account of which and over which they have gone to perdition? It is not needful that we proffer the wine-glass, directly or personally, with our own right hand, to some one that is weak in order to be the occasion of that brother's fall. Before God we are responsible for our influence, whether it extend to those whose palms we touch in the grasp of friendship, or to those into whose eyes we have never looked. Destroy not him with thy wine for whom Christ died. It is not right-it is wrong-it is sin-sin ag,ainst a brother, and sin against Christ-to put a stumbling-block or an occasion to fall in another's way. Does it not become every Christian, therefore, in view of the conceded perils of wine-drinking-in view of the awful record of lost souls connected with the use of the cup, and in view of the obligations of God's Gospel law of love, to let the wine-glass alone? Why this stout assertion of lawzfulness-this vigorous and vehement defence of liberty? As if liberty were endangered! As if any possible evil could by any possibility result from the self-imposed restraint of total abstinence, that could for one moment be compared with the sad and woeful evil of being the occasion by indulgence of a brother's fall! Oh! let us have a care that our good be not evil spoken of-that our liberty be not vindicated at the expense of charity. Certainly love is a diviner, more Christ-like thing 247 The WYine of the Word. than lawfulness. Self-sacrifice for the sake of others is a far higher level of spiritual life than the mere doing right. And to fortify a custom so indissolubly connected with evil consequence as wine-drinking, by building Scriptural bulwarks about it, is certainly to impair and fatally weaken any pressure of the claims of Christian benevolence alone. We may win from the chief patrons of the intoxicating cup hearty applause for such building work, but we shall not be making straight paths for the stumblers. God speed the time when Scriptural arguments in behalf of wine drinking shall be buried in a grave as deep as that where now lie the arguments by which the Word of God was once marshalled to the support of slavery! God speed the time when alcoholic wines and strong drinks shall be swept from every Christian sideboard, and table, and social feast; every member of every Christian church in all our land, in the spirit of a pervasive, abounding, all-embracing charity, saying,." Wine inaketh my brother to offend; slumbiers by the alcoholic cup are on every side of nme: therefore I will drink no wine while the world standeth." 248 STRANGE CHILDREN. "Rid me, and deliver me from the hand of strange children, whose mouth speaketh vaaity, and their right hand is a right hand of falsehood: that our sons may be as plants grown up in their youth; that our daughters may be as corner-stones, polished after the similitude of a palace."-PSALM cxliv. II, I2. HE strange children in David's time were the idolatrous heathen. Their influence upon the chosen people was most pernicious. Not only was their conversation vapid, but their actions were deceitful. In token of friendship they stretched forth the right hand, but the salutation was insincere and the heart treacherous. To turn from such a deceptive race was a duty solemnly enjoined upon those in covenant with Jehovah. To avoid them would be the first impulse of wisdom, for their influence could not but prove baneful, especially on the susceptible minds of the young and unwary. And while, in accordance with divine command and human reason, the king was endeavoring to exterminate these strange and wicked heathen, it was highly proper for him to direct his prayer to the Almighty, and - 0 6 Strang,e Chzildren. entreat him to afford the much-desired deliver. ance. Could this result be accomplished-could these unhallowed children of Satan be removed, and their corrupt influences stayed, what a happy people would Israel be with Jehovah for their God! Not only would they be blest with full and plenty, but their sons would be "as plants grown up in their youth "-springing up numerously and coming to early and beautiful maturity-the support of the land; and their daughters would be " as corner-stones polished after the similitude of a palace "-like the caryatides, or columns representing female figures, elegantly sculptured, and placed on the corners of noble edifices by Egyptian architects, the pride and glory as well as the support of the temple of state. Time has wrought great changes since David sat on the throne of Israel. The Holy Land has long been desecrated by the tread and rule of infidelity and heathenism; and the once holy people, having rejected Messiah, have lost the divine favor, and, scattered over the wide world, have become a hissing and a by-word to their fellowmen. They in turn are now the strange children -strange in their stubborn rejection of holy truth and in their alienation from the God of their fathers. The partition wall once excluding the Gentiles is now demolished, and "the chosen of the Lord" may be found in every land and among every 2