THE PUBLICATIONS OF TIIE lURlTEES SOCIETYESTABLISHED IN THE YEAR M.DCCC.XXXIV. VOL. XLVI. FOR THE YEAR M.DCCC.LXIV. Phil!I f l e, i;l I' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N!'I. —I ~-: —-1-~~~~~~~~~~~ ~-;Q _;N -- liabl, ~! THE PRIORY OF HEXHAM 3 TITLE DEEDS, BLACK BOOK, ETC. VOL. II.'i i i BY ANDREWS AND CO., DURHAM; WHITTAKER AND CO., 13 AVE MARIA LANE; T. AND W. BOONE, 29 NEW BOND STrREETq; BERNARD QUARITCH, 15 PICCADILLY; MRS. NUTT, 277 STRAND (Foreign Agent), LONDON; BLACKWOOD AND SONS, EDINBURGH. 1865. At a Meeting of the Council of the SURTEES SOCIETY, held in the Castle of Durham, on Friday, the 14th of March, 1862, JOHN HoDGSON HINDE, Esq., being in the chair; it was ordered "that a volume relating to Hexham should form one of the publications of the Society for 1863, and that the Secretary should be the editor." At a General Meeting of the SURTEES SOCIETY, held in the same place, on Monday, the 15th of June, 1863, Sir WILLIAM LAwSON, Bart., in the chair, it was ordered "that the forthcoming work on Hexham should be divided into two parts." JAMES RAINE, Secretary. LONDON: MITCHELL AND tILtGI-IES, PRINT:E-S, 24: WARDOTiTR STIRE.ET LONDON, W. THE PI EFACE. PART I.'RE we proceed to the documents in Ig\\'~ltf this volume, some prefatorial remarks upon them may be of use and interest. The Liber Niger, or, as it is commonly called, the Black t t ig ~ Book of Hexham, derives its name merely from the colour of the cover which it wears, like the Blue Books of the present day which are familiar /~ 1,;//0to every one. Similar appellations were common enough in old times. / e have the Black and Red Books of the English Exchequer, the White Register of York, the Red Book of Durham, and the Black and Red Books of Hexham. The Black Book of Hexham is a carefully drawn up rental of the possessions of the Priory. The Red Book is mentioned in the twelfth century, when we hear of some jurors taking an oath upon it.a It seems to have been a copy of the Gospels, a relic, perhaps, of some of the early prelates of the place; and it probably perished during some inroad of the Scots in the thirteenth century, as it is never spoken of afterwards.b The Red Book of Durham, which the student in history longs so ardently to discover, contained the annals of the see in Saxon times,c a See note to p. 85. b Vol. I., Appendix, xxv. c Hist. Dunelm. Scr. Tres, appendix, ccccxxii-v. Vi THE PRErACE. —PART i. It is probable enough that some similar chronicle was incorporated in the Liber Ruber of Hexham. The Black Book of Hexham is a rental of all the lands and possessions of the Prior and Convent of that place, wherever they might be. According to the title, it dates from the feast of Pentecost, 1479, but from internal evidence it is plain that the materials for the survey were being gathered together at an earlier period. In two places it is stated that a certain rent would become due for the first time at Pentecost, 1477,'7 so that this portion of the document is at all events prior to that year. The canons of Hexham had lands in places very widely apart, and some time would elapse before all the portions of the rentroll could be prepared on anything like a regular and systematic plan. The work, probably, was going on for several years, and was not completed until 1479. The document itself is not by any means one of an unusual character, as every religious house had a similar rental. The Black Book merely took the place of an earlier document. We find in it a mention of the Old lRoll.e These surveys were usually compiled from the rolls of the bailiffs of each particular manor or estate, who were probably desired to be more than ordinarily exact and minute in a stated year: the rolls would be examined as they were sent in, and the information they contained would be arranged by the terrarer. It will be observed that there are now and then in the document inequalities of description. Of some places there is a fuller account than of, others.. This is easily explained by my supposition that the survey is merely a codification of the various bailiffs' rolls, which were drawn up with more or less care. The terrarer made the best he could of them. The estates of the Priory of Hexham may be divided into two parts; the lands attached to the prebend of Salton, and those bestowed upon the canons in other places, and by various benefactors.. p). 8, 10. p. 72. TH E BLACK BOOK OF HEXHAM1, ETC. Vi; The prebend of Salton in the cathedral church of York was annexed to the Priorate of Hexham by archbishop Thurstan in the twelfth century, and it was not only the most honourable possession of the Priory, but it was also one of the most lucrative of the estates belonging to it. The Prior of Hexham could generally rely upon the regular payment of his Yorkshire rents, as there were no Scots or thieves in that county to make his lands unprofitable. The corpus of the prebend consisted of the manor of Salton, and of property in Edston, Great and Little Barugh in the parish of Kirkby-Misperton, Flaxton in the parish of Bossall, Millington, and, perhaps, at Givendale. All these places, save the two last mentioned, are in the North Riding of Yorkshire. Salton lies among the hills, about five miles from Kirkby Moorside, and almost midway between Helmsley and Malton. The Prior of HIexham had two residences there, one in the village, and another at the north end of the manor where there was a guest-hall with a camera, and divers other buildings attached to it. In the village itself there was a hall, with three chambers and a chapel, of which many remnants are in existence. We have some interesting materials for the history of the place. The hall seems to have been reserved for the use of the Prior and his officers, but the guest-hall was let in 1479, with the exception of a portion of the great barn, which was needed for the tithes belonging to the Prior. The Prior selected a steward or bailiff for the manor, who sent in an annual account roll,f and he chose besides ale-grieves, water-grieves, four jurors, and a stock-keeper. The tenants, in addition to their rents, were to contribute towards the purchase of a palfrey for every new Prior, to give to aids, to carry victuals for their lord and his suite when travelling in Yorkshire, to supply beds for his guests at Salton, to attend to the mill, and to carry stone, flint, and a11 kinds of timber for the repairs of the manorf Vol. I., Appendix, xxii., xxxix. Viii THE PIREFACE.-ePART 1. house.: The other constituent parts of the prebend were to make themselves similarly useful according to the extent of their land. As prebendary of Salton the Prior of Hexham had a house in York appropriated to his stall. This was let in 1457 to the parsons of the Minster; and the college of St. William, I believe, occupies its site., The Prior would be very rarely in the archiepiscopal city, and would gladly be free from the incumbrance of an official residence, which he was bound to keep in repair, although he could not use it. I must leave the history of Salton to the Yorkshire topographer, and turn northwards. Before I enter upon the general question of the estates of the Priory of Hexham, it will be well to clear the way a little by enumerating what may be called its ecclesiastical property, and to state the number of livings that it possessed. There are maiiy documents relating to these livings in this volume, and the following list will be of some service to the reader. I have spoken elsewhere of the wretched system that prevailed of making no formal endowments for vicarages, which was exceedingly short-sighted and reprehensible. HEXHAM. The Priory itself was the church of the parish, and a portion of it would be specially devoted to the use of the inhabitants. Every monastery, I believe, was in itself a parish. Subordinated to the parish church of Hexham were the chapels of SS. Mary and Peter in tile town," and those of St. John Lee, St. Oswald's, Bingfield, and Alwenton. In 1286 archbishop Romanus ordered the parishioners of Hexham to keep the chapels in repair, save the chancels, which the Prior and canons were to attend to. They were also to find a missal and a chalice for each.j In 1294 the same prelate cited the Prior and Convent that they might shew cause why vicars were not properly instituted at Hexham and Alwenton.k In the beginning of the g See pp. 72-6, also pp. 83-4, 154-5. h pp. 152-3. i Vol. I., pp. 14-15; II., p. 123. i See pp. 102-3. k Ibid., 106-7. THE BLACK BOOK OF HEXHAM, ETC. ix next century archbishop Greenfield again took up the question of the vicars, but he was stopped by the. production of a bull of Alexander IV., releasing the Prior and Convent from the duty of creating them.' ALSTON, a Northumbrian rectory. The advowson was given to Hexham by Ivo de Veteri-Ponte, together with the chapel of Gerard's Gill.,, It was recovered from the Prior and Convent in a suit at law by Edward I., but was restored to them towards the close of his reign.? In 1335 they begged Edward III. for leave to have the revenues of the living appropriated to them.~ This did not take place until 1378, when it was done by Thomas Hatfield, bishop of Durham. A proper endowment of the vicarage was not made until the year 1420.P WARDEN. This church belonged to the Priory by the gift of Adam de Tindale. A pension of twenty marks per annum out of it was reserved to the bishops of Durham, and this was granted by King John in the sixteenth year of his reign to Robert Morell.r In 1243 there was a re-ordination of the vicarage, and the stipend of the vicar was fixed at thirty-six marks per annum.s As Warden was so near to Hexhan, it was frequently held by a canon. According to the Augustinian rule, no canon could live out of his monastery, unless he had a brother with him. In 1337 this rule was disregarded, and its observance was ordered by archbishop Melton.t Dependent on the church of Warden in 1297 were the chapels of Stancroft, Hayden, and Langley.u CHOLLERTON. This living, together with its chapels of Birtley, Chipchase, Gunnerton, East Swinburn, Little Heton, l Ibid., 121, etc. llH Iodgson's Northumberland, iii., part ii., 36. n See p. 119. 0o ot. Parl., ii., 77. I Hodgson's Northumberland, ii., part iii., 82-6, where these documents are printed. q See p. 110. r See p. 91. sIodgson's Northumberland, ii., part iii., 160, etc.; iii., part ii., 408,. Vol. I., Appendix, xxxix., xl. "See p. 110. X THE PREFACE. —PART I. and Colwell, was given to Hexham by Odonel d'Umfreville.v The deed of gift and the ordination of the vicarage are lost, and there is but one document in existence relating to the place in connection with the Priory, and that refers to the chapel at Chipchase.?w STAMFORDHAM. In 1245 Nicholas, bishop of Durham, appropriated to Hexham the tithes of East Matfen, Nesbit, Ulkeston, Hawkwell, and Bitchfield, a payment of fifty marks per annum to be made out of them to the bishops of Durham.? In the 33rd of Edward I. the king granted the advowson to the Priory, having recovered it in a court of law against the bishop of Durham, and Edward II. confirmed his father's gift.y In 1340 bishop Bury, in a time of emergency, reduced the annual payment to himself out of the living from fifty to forty marks., Stamfordham was a vicarage usually held by a canon of Hexham, and the same order was made about it in 1311 and 1337 as was made about Warden.a SLALEY. This chapel was given to Hexham in the time of Henry III. by Gilbert de Slaley.6 OVINGIIAM. This living, which, like those already named, is in Northumberland, was appropriated to Hexham in 1378 by bishop Hatfield, the presentation having been previously given by Henry Percy, earl of Northumberland. Gilbert d'Umfreville, earl of Angus, was the originator of Earl Percy's gift, and the three canons and the vicar who were placed at Ovingham were bound to pray for the two earls and Richard II. Ovingham was thus made a ceil of Hexham.c THE HOSPITAL or ST. GILES AT IEXHAM?. This place, as the name of the Saint betokens, was built for the reception of See p. 111. W See pp. 98-9. E Ibid., pp. 115-116. Hodgson's Northumberland, ii., part iii., 105-7. y See p. 118. z Ibid., 136-7. " Vol. I., Appendix, xxxix, xlix. I See p. 112. Vol. I., Preface, c-ci. HIodgson's Northumberland, ii., part iii., 97-101. I have not reprinted the deed of appropriation, as Mr. H-odgson gives it with sufficient fulness. TIIHE LACK BOOK OF IEXHAIM, ETC. xi lepers. The founder was one of the early archbishops of York, probably Thomas II. or Thurstan. There is a deed preserved, by which, on Feb. 16th, 1200-1, King John allowed the lepers to be exempt in all that they buy or sell from the payment of the tolls of pontage and passage on the royal lands in Yorkshire and Northumberland.d In 1320 an enquiry was made into the condition of the hospital, which tells us much about its history. The name of its founder was lost, for the muniments of the place had been carried away by a brother, who fled from the Scots. They caught and killed him, and his freight perished. The estates of the hospital were literally nothing. All its arable land could easily be cultivated by a single plough. An annual rent-charge of 1s. 2d. on property in Hexham, Fallowfield, and Portgate produced nothing, as the places were waste. Before the war the brethren received daily from the Priory four loaves of black bread and four lagen&e of secondary beer or ale, and a laena when any one brewed on the Prior's land in Hexham: now, they got nothing save six black loaves and two Iagente of secondary beer a week. We learn, also, that the hospital was founded for poor sick husbandmen, born within the liberty, who were lepers. Each archbishop and each prior could appoint two of his own tenmLnts, and no more. Thus there could not be more than fout brethren of their nomination in the hospital at one time, but any one might be admitted by the leave of the master on paying a sufficient sum for his maintenance. In 1320 the property of the hospital was barely sufficient for three brothers, and, to live in it, they were obliged to work hard. Formerly there wvere seven or eight inmates; now, in their present poverty, none could be admitted without paying. They have but four affri and iour oxen for their plough, two of each being lent; and their corn is scarcely sufficient for the year's sowing.e One or two orders from the archbishops for the admission of " See p. 89.' See pp. 130-2. Xii THE PREBACE.-PART 1. brothers have been preserved.f The following is a list of the wardens or masters of the hospital, as far as I have been able to make it out. It seems probable that the office was occasionally vacant. 1274, August 20. Dan Walter de Scrapetoft, collated by the archbishop during his stay at Hexham.s 1313, June 11. Robert le Porter collated.h 1318, April 26. Robert de Whelpington, Prior of Hexham, coll.i 1331, July 4. Dan William, son of Walter, the fuller, of Hexham, priest, coll.i 1334, July 14. Dan Robert de Ferghan, of Corbridge, chaplain, coll.i 1343-4, Feb. 2. Dan Robert de Ferghan, of Corbridge, chaplain, apparently re-appointed.t 1354, May 5. Roger de Clone, domestic chaplain of the archbishop.m 1354, July 20. Mr. William de Fenton collated on Clone's resignation.n 1359, August 6. John, son of William de Ridshawe, sen., coll. He resigned in 1377-8.o When Ridshawe resigned, a great change took place in the condition of the hospital. It was so poor that it scarcely contained any inmates, and few, if any, cared to be master. Nrchbishop Neville, therefore, made it over to the Prior and canons, obliging them to maintain two poor men either within the hospital or their priory, and to find a chaplain to perform service f See p. 129. On March 8, 1345-6, the corrody held by Robert de Aldencrawe during his life in the hospital of Hexhamr was granted to John de Fosseeton (Reg. archiep. Zouche, 292 b). 1336, April 17. Breve nov. disseis., Mr. et Fratres hosp. v. Prior. et Conv. de Ilexham. Lib. ten. in Ilexham (Reg. Melton, 437 a). g Reg. archiep. Giffard, 112. h Reg. Greenfield, ii., 40 b. He is appointed to provide fitting sustenance for the brothers and sisters. R Reg. Melton, 400 b. i Ibid., 430 a. k Ibid., 434 a. Reg Zouche, 291 b. eg.'l'horesby, 26 b. e Reg. Thoresby, 26 b. ~ Ibid., 3026. Reg. Neville, i., 90 6. THE BLACK BOOK OF HEXHAM, ETC. xiii in the chapel of the hospital once a week.1 This arrangement seems only to have been a temporary one, as I find several masters appointed subsequently. 1398, July 18. John Martyn, the archbishop's domestic chaplain. Thomas Parker. 1409, June 28. Nicholas Tydd, clerk, collated, exchanging for it with Parker a stall in St. Sepulchre's chapel at Yorlk." 1409, July 24. Mr. John Storthwayte collated.s The hospital, however, seems to have reverted to the Priory, and was in its possession at the Dissolution, when it was said to be worth 13s. 4d. a year; it comprised the house and thirty-two acres of arable land attached to it.t It then fell into lay hands, and is now the residence of the famlily of Kirsopp, bearing the name of the Spital. There are some fragments of old walls still preserved, and a figure carved in oak, supposed to commemorate St. Giles. RENWICK in Cumberland. This living and the next belonged to Hexham certainly in the thirteenth century. The Prior and canons made out their title to them before the bishop of Carlisle in 1359.1' IsELL, in the same county. SALTON, in the North Riding of Yorkshire. This living, attached to the prebend, belonged to Hexhamn from the time of archbishop Thurstan. There was an ordination of it made in 1312.v In 1344 it was retaxed on account of the injuries done to it by the Scots.w The records of the visitations of the church and parish in 1473, 1481, and 1519 have been preserved.x EDSTON, in the same district, was granted to Hexham in the twelfth century. The donor is stated in one place to have been archbishop gRoger,?y in another Hugo de Twithe.z In 1310 there was an ordination of the vicarage, great irregularities p See pp. 145-7. q Reg. Scrope, 106 a. I Reg. Bowet,, i., 271 a. s Ibid. t See p. 159. " Ibid., pp. 142-3. v Ibid., p. 128. ~v Ibid., p. 138. -' Ibid., pp. 155-7. Y Ibid., p. 86. = Coll. Top. et Geneal., vi., 39. XiVA THE PIREFACE.-PART I. having existed previously." There is an inscription in Saxon characters on a sun-dial above the church porch. ILKLEY, in the West Riding of Yorkshire. The canons had the right of presenting to this living by the gift of Henry Percy, earl of Northumberland. In 1378 archbishop Neville at their urgent request appropriated the living to them, and made an ordination of a vicarage.' We now come to the landed estates of the Prior and Convent of Hexham, which were situated in four of the Northern counties, Yorkshire, Dinuham, Northumberland, and Cumberland. With regard to three of these counties it will be unnecessary to say much. Passing by the manor of Salton and its appendages, the Yorkshire property of the Priory of HEexham was only in four places, Great and Little Broughton, the extinct parish of Kirkby in Cleveland and Ingleby. This, which was of no great annual value, was given to the canons by various persons in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. They had at one time a house in Goodramgate in York of the gift of Sunnulphus the priest;C unless we are to suppose, perhaps, that this was the official residence of the prebendary of Salton. In the county of Durham there was property belonging to H exham at Green Heley near Muggleswick, Fenhall and Maidenstanhall in the parish of Lanchester, Kimblesworth near Durham, Stainton le Street, a house or two in Hartlepool, and some valuable lands in Silksworth and its vicinity, which were given by the Fitz MAarmadukes.d In Cumberland some lands in the parishes of Isell See pp. 125-8. b Ibid., pp. 147-151. "c Vol. I., 59. d Among the evidences of the Dean and Chapter of Durham, iii., 7, Specialium, is the following deed, which is preserved there because the Prior and Convent of that place had lands in Silksworth:-" 1Hec indentura testatur quod Ricardus filius Johannis filii Marladuci remisit-Priori et Conventui de lHextildesham totum jus et clamium quod habuit —in omnibus terris et tenementis qum praTdicti Prior et Conventus habuit —de dono et concessione antecessorum suorum in Silksworth. Iemisit etiam-totum jus et clamium quod habuit —in redditu cujusdam paris botarum-una cusn multura et secta molendini sui in Silkesworth. Data Dunelmi'ae iiij die mensis Aprilis, anno Domini mcccxij~." (Small oval seal of the Priorate of Hlexhain, engraved in Vol. I. Preface, cxl.) THE BLACK BOOK OF HEXHAM, ETC. XV and Renwick belonged to them, which had probably been given by Waldeve and Alan his son. They had also, at one time, a herring-fishery somewhere on the coast of Allerdale, which cannot be traced. In Carlisle they had one or two plots of ground with a house or two upon them of the gift of David king of Scotland and Henry his son.e But it was in Northumberland that the Priory of Hexhamn had the bulk of its property, and it was very large indeed. it was chiefly in Tindale ward, and it is not too much to say that from the borders of Cumberland to Newcastle-on-Tyne there was no parish in which the Prior and canons had not a large interest. They could not have had less than twenty thousand acres of land in Northunberland. To know how all these came to the Priory we must look at the great Inspeximus of 1297, inT which, immediately after a Scottish invasion in which the muniments of the canons had been consumed, their possessions were formally settled and assured to them by the verdict of a jury. We thus have not only a list of their Northumbrian estates, but the names of the persons who gave them. The greater part of these benefactions seems to have been made in the twelfth century or soon after it. Passing by the archbishops of York and their numerous gifts, we find among thie donors many of the great potentates and barons of Northumberland. First and foremost is David king of Scotland, with his son and grandson prince Henry and William the Lion. Superior to his royal masters in munificence was Adam de Tindale, who bestowed upon the Prior and canons the manor and church of Warden with its numerous chapeiries, and his lands at Byres. The illustrious family of Umfreville had many claims upon the gratitude of the house of Hexham, and the canons at Ovingham, when they prayed for the soul of Gilbert Umfreville, the last earl of Angus of that line, would call to mind a noble ancestor of their benefactor whlo bore both his names, together with Odonel and e Ibid., ii., 14. XV1i THIE PREFACE.-PART I. iRichard Umfreville,f who were barons of e renown in the days of Henry II. and his ill-fated sons.. cr,, <^,,, 1~J I Richard Cumin, who with Hextilda'; % his lady gave to the Priory the ham(: