Foresh^«>wings hhn Genesis W. LINCOLN yrt *r® 5 ? 7 . R cr» ” < 7 * 7 en 5 THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL ENDOWED BY THE DIALECTIC AND PHILANTHROPIC SOCIETIES BS1239 • L56 1880Z 2 4 197? a 00001 23380 I his book is due at the LOUIS R. WILSON LIBRARY on the last date stamped under “Date Due.” If not on hold it may be renewed by bringing it to the library. 1 !E M., : DATE DrT DUE RET DATE RFT DUE KLF fe ' DEC 19 *9? f vi Q Q ^ - 1 V* . ore.?. 7 9 H* u ( Id r r r i \/ r n W 0W %% - uu « if AY 0 1 WR 1 T\ t L L 1 V L U i v Ml v X lU 10 _ Form No 613 i Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2019 with funding .from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill https://archive.org/details/typicalforeshadoOOIinc I TYPICAL FORESHADOWINGS IN GENESIS. TYPICAL FORESHADOWINGS IN GENESIS; f * u. V ' OB, ®torl& ta Gtontr, stub iljr J9 tiring |3 reparations for it. jLtcL BY WILLIAM LINCOLN, AUTBOE OB “lECTBEES ON THE EEYELATION,” ETC. “ Known unto God are all tjis works from the beginning of the world. ’—Acts xv. 13. 7 ravra opi^ercu rco rekei. LONDON: JOHN F. SHAW & CO., 48 . PATERNOSTER ROW, E.C. PREFACE. The endeavour, in tlie following pages, is mainly to draw out the teaching of this book viewed as a whole. No doubt each of its many chapters abounds in instruc¬ tion ; and inasmuch as it narrates the history of the early patriarchs, one cannot but linger over the lessons suggested by each inspired sketch successively presented to us, and even by the various incidents of each several life selected by the Spirit for our study. And this, as it is the usual method of reading this book, so it is a very profitable one. Nevertheless, since each book of God’s Word is one only of God’s own divisions or chapters, so it is surely well for us clearly to ascertain what He would have us learn, from one such division or book of His, regarded in its entirety. For instance, there may be a parallel designed by Him, and therefore to be reverently instituted by us be¬ tween the account of God’s work in the Creation and the Lord’s ways with the seven representative men of this book. Thus as in Chapter I., so, too, in the body of the book, the marked twofoldedness of the realms of (^od to wit, in heaven and in earth—is seen in the different call of Enoch on the one hand, from that of Noah on the other. So likewise, also in Chapter I., the call of God produces Light on the very first day. VI PREFACE. Yet the distinction is evident of this light from the Sun itself, whose beams of glory shone out unhindered not until the fourth day. 2 Cor. iii. 18 with iv. 6. For as the Spirit was, in a certain sense, in the world even before the man Christ Jesus was raised up and seated upon God’s throne, yet is that Spirit fully now poured out from the Son glorified ; so in the narrative, after the picture of Abraham the believer, we are instructed as to His way with Isaac the son. For it is because we are sons, God has sent forth the Spirit of His Son into our hearts. Or, once more, there is alike at the close of this book, as well as at the end of the account of the Creation, the Rule over all in the hands of a man. These are fainter specimens in the first chapter, of what we find to be much more distinctly foreshadowed in the course of the entire panorama of the other forty-nine chapters. They serve to premonish us that the book of Genesis should be primarily regarded as connected in its lessons from end to end. It would seem as if the main lessons of the book are two : one is, how the Rule erst entrusted to man, but lost through sin, shall yet again, in an enlarged and uni¬ versal form, be seen in Human hands. For contrast the type of Joseph with that of Adam. And secondly, we learn how God’s own people shall be blessed in that coming Lord, some in the heavenlies, and some in the earthlies, and in divers concentric circles of glory, as displayed in His ways of grace with Enoch and Noah ; and in his disciplinary dealings and training of Abra^ ham, and Isaac and Jacob. CONTENTS. PAGE Introductory Remarks.. The Lord’s Way with Adam, the Type of Him that is to come.3 The Lord’s Way with Enoch, the Saint for Heaven . 14 The Lord’s Way with Noah, the Saint for the Earth Section I. Noah, previous to the Deluge ... 21 Section II. Noah, subsequent to the Deluge . 34 The Lord’s Way with Abraham, the Believer Section I. His call to Canaan. His blessing by Melchisedek, after the slaughter of the kings 44 Section II. The training of the believer for the inheritance.54 Section III. The Lord’s way with believing Abraham, as a father . . . .79 The Lord’s Way with Isaac, the Typical Son . . 95 The Lord’s Way with Jacob, the Typical Servant Section I. His absence from home, whilst engaged in earning his two brides and his flock . . 106 Section II. His progress homeward to Bethel, and guiding the family and flock thither . . 124 CONTENTS. vm The Lord’s Way with Joseph, the Typical Euler Section I. Edom in power; whilst the family of this coming- Euler are strangers in Canaan. Section II. He who is to rule typically according to God, must first learn to obey. The descent after the flesh, of the true king Section III. Since all is light in the presence of God, so there is His judgment seen by him who, for obedience, is in the depths of this world’s rejection and degradation Section IY. The Appointment of the Euler . Section Y. Joseph, the Euler’s behaviour towards his brethren ...... Section VI. Joseph the Euler’s service to Pharaoh, in the full subjugation of all to his autho¬ rity and in blessing to the whole land Section VII. The Closing years of Jacob and of Joseph. PAGE 141 147 158 168 173 193 195 Conclusion 205 TYPICAL FORESHADOWINGS IN THE BOOK OF GENESIS. Introiiucioin Hsntarha. T T had been well if the first verse, and beginning of the second, had been separated from the after verses, and entitled chapter i. and thus seen to be distinct from the narrative of God’s constituting the earth as a suit¬ able abode for His creature man. The second verse says that the earth, ere God began again to work upon it, was “ toliu ,” rendered u without form.” But Isa. xlv. 18, asserts that God did not create it “ tohu.” And in Isa. xxxiv. 11, the same two words occur precisely as we have here, “tohu ,” “ bohu '—“confusiou and emptiness ” as they are translated there. Compare also Jer. iv. 23, and Rev. xvi. 18. From these four passages we are, perhaps, led to infer that judgment had swept over this planet ere man had aught to do with it. Curiosity would here invite us to enter the realms of conjecture, encouraged by the wise and foolish guesses of geology. But let us from this singular opening of the book learn one most valuable lesson, that the silence of Scrip¬ ture is itself instructive. Let us therefore refuse to be 1 2 Introductory Remarks. wise beyond what is written. If it had pleased God that at present we should know more certainly of the early stages through which the earth has passed, He would have told us more. But since He has not, let us bow our heads and confess our ignorance. It has been said that the Bible is the history of man. Were this the fact, then it would inevitably follow that the proper study of mankind is man. But this is an atheistic sentiment. Better far to say that this Book traces the pathway of God through the narrow isthmus of time, and that it reveals His ways and His doings towards His frail, and sinful, and erring subject, man. How in the course of the fifty chapters of which this book is composed, seven men, each one’of them a represen¬ tative man, specially pass before our eyes. The account of The Lord’s dealings with these seven men constitutes the substance of this book. These seven of course are, as is well known, Adam, Enoch, and Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph. Many other personages here appear. Still in relation to one or another of these all may be grouped. Therefore we may divide our remarks on this book bv ranging what we are told under one or another of these seven, and of God's action towards each of them. Upon this most instructive Book of Genesis—the Book of the germs or seeds of everything—writers have been wont to direct their attention principally to the first half thereof. This surely is a mistake and a defect. Eor the main subject of this book is progressively and regularly developed, even as the work in creation is gradually unfolded in Chapter I. And accordingly, m the following addresses, care has been taken to trace this development, evidently designed, as well and as much from Chapter XXY. to the end, as from Chapter I. to Chapter XXY. ®!j t Xnrifs tEtag tuitlj tlje ttm£ of Hint tljat is to tomt. Genesis i.—iii. A T the outset it is advisable that we should state ^ that the variation in the Name divine found in these chapters is perfectly intentional. Fools may laugh and cite this admitted variation as a proof that Moses was a mere compiler, putting his narrative together from various shreds of tradition extant in his day. We know- better. We know that this is the Word of God. True, that in chapter i. this name is Elohitn, or God ; that in chapters ii.* and iii. it is Jehovah-Elohim; whilst in chapter iv. it is Jehovah. This change of term to an in¬ telligent reader of Scripture ought to be at once some clue to the history itself. For Elohitn is His name as Creator; Jehovah-Elohim is the revelation ol that Creator in relationship with His creature; whilst His name Jehovah reveals Him still, indeed, in relationship, but no longer on the ground of mere creation. Surely we may exclaim, “ How beautifully exact is all this !” Chapter I. shows us God preparing a home, replete with every comfort and blessing for His creature; and ■* The word translated " generations/’ in chap. ii. 4, is ever prospective, and never retrospective, as see chaps, vi. 9 and xi. 17. 4 Typical Foreshadow mgs. then, secondly, His formation of that creature, and His placing him in the home prepared for him. Even for the very cattle the earth was suitably adapted, ere those cattle were called into existence. It would be quite foreign to the subject assigned me, and to the limits within which it must be contained, to enlarge upon every verse. All that is proposed is to present a general survey of the entire book of Genesis as a whole. Let it therefore be perfectly understood that I refrain myself from remarking upon many expressions on which one might easily dilate. Suffice it to say that the six days’ work is subdivided into two threes, in which the light, the waters, and the earth, are severally addressed twice. At length, since it is ever His wont to keep the best till the last, and to reveal His deepest purposes at the close, He forms man. There is here to be observed a consultation held about the making of man, such as there had not been of any other creature. And if it is asked, “ With whom took He counsel? ’’ a full answer is furnished us in Prov. viii. about Wisdom, who is the Word ere He had come forth ; or, again, in John i., about the Word, who is Wisdom after He had come forth from God. Also compare Gen. i. 2 and Job xxxiii. 4. And this very distinction, great and impor¬ tant as it evidently is, proves the difference to be vast indeed between man on the one hand, and all other ani¬ mals on the other. To this add, that man was made in the image and likeness of God, and that, in chap, ii., we are told that the breath of Jehovah-Elobim was breathed into him. Then we can see the folly of those who would degrade man to the level of a brute, or inaiutain that his existence did not differ funda¬ mentally from the existence of the brute. Were there The Lord’s Way with Adam. 5 no such difference, what would have become of the breath of God ? I only add here, that in verse 28 Eve is seen to be blessed in Adam ere she actually existed. This is a most exquisite picture when viewed typically. Again, even after his creation, and his being placed in Paradise, Adam was not entitled to anything that he beheld. Nothing was his until God had said to him, “ Behold, I have given you,” etc. Once more, remark that the first three verses of chapter ii. may be conjoined here.* Then you hear of God at rest as to His creation work, until the sin of His creature disturbed that rest, and led Him to commence to work again, that He might rest in redemption-rest, which rest none shall ever be able to disturb, because it does not depend on any goodness of the creature, as did that former rest (chap. i. 31). It depends altogether on the finished work of the Son of God upon the cross. Here, for the first time, we en¬ counter that precious word “finished,” a word which ever and anon crops up as the great work of God’s Son looms more and more into view. So ot His Tabernacle in Exod. xl., and of His Temple in 2 Chron. vii. 11, this language is used, as well as by Christ in His address to His Father in John xvii.; as also when about to de¬ liver His Spirit up to His Father (John xix.). And presently, when all is fulfilled ol that which He has spoken to us in His Word, He will once more sound this triumphant note (Rev. xxi.). Chapter II. brings before us three things—(1) Man’s relationship to God, with the duty incumbent on him ot obeying implicitly that God in everything; (2) Also woman’s relationship to man; and (3) the other crea- * The word “thus,” in chap. ii. 1, is more exactly rendered “ and.” 6 Typical Foreshadowings . tures’ relationship to man and woman. Thus through¬ out God’s work there is seen to be due subordination ot one above another ; also of God being over all, and of man in authority, His representative on earth. Butman failing to recognize God as his superior, the sceptre fell Jrom his hands, and chaos and sin, both in the world without and within, is the consequence. Instead of the spirit ruling the soul, and the soul the body, the flesh sways the soul; and the spirit of man, whereby he may commune with God, is set aside, is dead. But Christ, the Second Man, the Lord from Heaven, will yet in His time show on earth what beautiful rule is (1 Tim. vi. 13). Only Christ’s authority as Man shall extend throughout the entire universe. For study how Psalm viii. is expanded in a manner far beyond what the Psalmist ever dreamt of in its application to Him by the Holy Ghost, in Heb. ii. 8, 1 Cor. xv. 25, and Eph. i. 22. Then shall be seen the heavens opened, and the angels of God ascending as well as descending unto the Son of Man. This is that reign of the Man of whom we read in Dan. vii. And in all this glory Christ will still act as the willing servant of God His Father. The action of God, in bringing the animals to be named by Adam, was designed to signify the delegated ownership and authority over them entrusted to Adam (compare Da. xliii. 1). But there was also another and profounder object effected likewise thereby ; for thus was Adam made to feel his loneliness. So after Adam, created early on the sixth day, had been occupied in naming the animals brought to him throughout the day, then God caused a deep sleep to fall upon him. And during that night a rib was taken from his side, and “budded” (so Hebrew) into a woman. And thus was a helpmeet found for him. Likewise, whilst as to this 7 The Lord’s IVay with Adam. world Christ appears to sleep, God is intent on building the Church, taken from Christ’s body. A rib is taken from his side, as if a cedar-plank had been taken from the Temple, and formed into a splendid vessel for its service. For we are members of His body—out of His flesh, and out of His bones. The falling asleep of Adam, and then awaking, and finding his Eve, resemble the two Advents of the Lord, and prove that only from a slain and (as faith knows) a risen Christ can the Church be formed. And though she was “ builded ” in the silence of the night, yet in the morning did she appear in maturity, and in resurrection beauty. And Adam gladly recoguized her. His words, “ This is now,” etc., are equivalent to “ She will do.” He saw the glad results of his sleep, and he was satisfied. He was not ashamed of her, nor Christ of us. But in all this the leading thought is evidently not of Eve, but of Adam. She was necessary to him, as we in resurrection (1 Cor. xv.) are the fulness of Him that filleth all in all. “The woman is for the man ” (1 Cor. xi. 9). God is preparing “a marriage for His Son ” (Matt. xxii.). God’s consent to this marriage was seen in bringing Eve,and. Eve’s incoming to Adam. But in the divine reality His bride is not only taken out of Him, but is presented by Hiinselt to Himself. That is to say, Christ is not only the One from Whom she is taken, and by Whom, as she comes into existence, she is nourished and cherished, but also He is the God Who makes the presentation, as well as the Man to \V horn the presentation is made. I am aware that some deny much of this. 1 am also assured how futile their objection is. But, alas ! more and more of truth is assailed every year. Am I told that there is only one Scripture which seems to prove that the 8 Typical Foreshadowings. Church is Christ’s heavenly Bride, and that even it, when examined does not assert this P My reply is, it has ever been the custom, in all the centuries of this dispensation, of those inclined to fritter away and to surrender the truth of God, to attempt to weaken the force of any part of this truth, by maintaining that only such and such Scriptures appear to support it. The more vehement those men are against any truth, the fewer Scriptures will they admit to bear upon it. Thus, for instance, acts the Unitarian with regard to the divinity of Christ. Such will tell you that only John i. and Phil. ii. contain any semblance of proof thereof. How many more could simple Chris¬ tians quote than these! And I am clear that several other Scriptures, besides Eph. v., teach the bridal rela¬ tionship of the Church to Christ, and that other Scrip¬ tures again assume it as a fact. But even if there was only the one in Eph. v., this ought to be ample; and would be, to one who had no pretty novelty to support. Though the term Bride is not found in that pas¬ sage, yet the sentiment is, very abundantly. It is possible to be caught by a word, so as to overlook the whole train of thought. Here the train of thought is denied, for the lack of that single word. Dare any one deny that the allusion throughout Eph. v. 23—32 is to the taking of Eve out of Adam’s body, in order to the building of a suitable bride for Adam thereupon ? Will you maintain that the sentiment designed to be conveyed is of the Church being the Body, and not of the Church being the Bride of the Lamb ? As well might any one dream of a man formally presenting his own body to himself! But the explanation at the close, by the in¬ spired writer himself, ought to set aside all such notions. Eor he says, “ I speak concerning Christ and the Church.” Now. were the leading thought in this Scrip- ri- 9 The Lord’s Way with Adam. ture, of the Bride as Christ’s Body, what would be the force of the word “and ?” It is utterly superfluous; in fact, in another Scripture, where the same writer does speak of Christ with His Church, as one Body, his lan¬ guage is remarkably varied. Then his words are, “So also is the Christ” (1 Cor. xii. 12). Here, you observe, there is no “ and ” added. For the two are assumed as one. But in Ephesians there is this “and,” for the one is assumed to be two. I mean, in the one Scripture (1 Cor. xii.), it is taught that the twain are one ; and in the other (Eph. v.), that the one is twain. The fact is, these two connected truths were designed to be counter truths. For the one reveals rather the grandeur of the Church’s position; the other, her subordination and His affection. The one places her on the throne with Christ; the other witnesses her as the leading, and yet the humblest, worshipper at His feet. Take away either truth, and you mar much the effect of the whole. How can you gladly bend before Him, if you o?ly see your oneness with Him ? How can you appreciate your calling, your position, if only at His feet you are pro¬ strate ? Revelation v. pictures to us the Church in both her proper attitudes. Never there is she seen standing; at one time she is sitting by Him, at another worship¬ ping before Him. As some old writer has quaintly said, “ Eve was taken not from the head of Adam, that she might demean herself as lord ; nor yet from his feet, as if she was to be trampled under foot; but from his side, that she might be his fit companion, and that his affec¬ tion might be set upon her.” But now the perfect way of the heavenly Bridegroom owards the Bride is set forth succinctly and yet most fully in that said Scripture, where the scene here re¬ ceives its inspired parallel and antitypical interpreta- io Typical Foreshadowings. tion. Also, with great propriety this is traced out for us in the epistle to the Ephesians. For that is the one epistle which definitely treats of the cor¬ porate standing of the Church as in the heavenlies. And the notable passage there in Ephesians v. appears to be a designed climax of the entire teaching of that grand epistle. It is found here, indeed, in the midst of a:i exhortation to husbands to love their wives. But this apparently incidental way of its introduction is quite m the style of new testament Scripture as regards very many most important truths. And here we note seven things predicated of the Lord as to His behaviour towards His Bride. First , He loved her. Thus all His subsequent action is traced up to and interpreted in the light of its blessed source. For next to His love of the Father, comes His love of the Church as His motive- power in doing and suffering all for her that He has done. He beheld that Church in the glass of Grod’s decree, and His soul was enraptured with that sight. Hence, secondly, He gave Himself for her. Aud love beyond this is clearly impossible even for Him. Who ever heard of a love like this? And His love is still the same! He is risen, He is glorified. But unchanged, persisting in His love He is engaged in its display though now in other aspects. Having purchased her for Him¬ self, He is intent on rendering her such an one as He desires her to be, as His eternal companion and the object of His love. Ho other bridegroom can render the bride of his choice what he would like. But this is precisely how the Lord is at present occupied with the Church. And this is enlarged upon in the next four particulars. For, thirdly , He sanctifies her unto the light and purity to which she has been called. Fourthly, He cleanses her from all iniquity, by the continually repeated '[lie Lord’s Way with Adam. 11 application through the Spirit, of the water of the word of God. And these two—the sanctification and the cleansing—must ever he combined. A heavenly mind without simple, hearty obedience is of little value. Hence as water acts on the body, so the word is to act on the motives, thoughts, life, and walk by the energy of the Holy Ghost. But if these two involve sorrow whilst the work is only in process; so, fifthly and sixthly , the other corresponding two, to wit, the “nourishing ” and the “cherishing” furnish heavenly support and comfort. In the Lord’s untiring attention to her sustentation and growth is the cause traced of every atom of spiritual strength she receives from the doctrines, the promises, and the truths of Scripture. And in His “ cherishing of her, and administration of warmth to her, is indicated from Whom comes all increasing spiritual apprehension and joy in God and in His love. And thus in process of time does she corporately, and the several members thereof individually, as they come into being during the night of this dispensation, grow in grace and in the dis¬ tinct perception of whose hand is at work upon her, and of what He is doing with her. And, as morning neared, Eve would become quite conscious ol her own actual existence ; so the Church, after ages of slumber, is at last awaking up to the grandeur and the bliss of her calling, and to the imminence of her presentation in person to her divine Bridegroom. This, of course, is the ultimate issue of this amazing and long-continued process in His work upon us now. And accordingly the words in verse 27 should be thus rendered“ that He Himself might present her to Himself, the Church, glorious, not having spot, or Avrinkle, or any such thing.” Compare Jude 24 And when the Bridegroom and Bride at length meet, eac}^ i % Typical Foreshadowings. we know, will be mutually “ satisfied ” with the other. Isaiah liii. 11 ; Psalm xvii. 15. And the first to gaze at ease and in full upon the unveiled glory and beauty of incarnate Deity will be the Church of God. “ We shall see Him as He is ” (1 John iii.) And thus as the temple of God, this Church will have God dwelling in her; and as His Body, will have God above her; so as His Bride she will have Him with her. For as the Temple, God, even the Father, will fill it and every living stone thereof with Himself; and as the Bride, she is Christ's; so as the Body she is filled with the Holy Ghost from her divine Head. And whilst these three combined , perfectly set forth her eternal relationship towards the three-one God; her name as the City, the New Jerusalem, sets forth her relationship to the universe below her. In my Lectures on the book of Revelation I have already remarked on the two Trees of the knowledge and of the life, now combined in Christ, and on the River representing the Holy Ghost. For life from Him is undivided in the garden whilst man is unfallen; but outside thereof to man fallen it has four forms, as in the four Gospels, or as in the four cherubim. Chaptee III. Obedience that may not be tested is no obedience at all. Here the question is simply one of God’s authority, and of man’s ready subjection to Him. The test was a perfect one. Had God made it to be in some question of moral evil, such would not have so dis¬ tinctly asserted the authority of God. But here the partaking of the fruit was only evil, because God had forbidden it. There was no reason why the fruit should not be eaten, other than the plain command of God. Many now likewise judge of obedience after the flesh The Lord’s IVay with Adam. i 3 likewise. They can see some reason why they should live honestly; but such commands as relate to Baptism or to the Supper of the Lord, for instance, are stigma¬ tized as unnecessary. There is no real perception of God, and of His will being supreme, in such cases. Then Adam, having disobeyed God, the Lord begins to unfold the resources of grace. Satan is here termed “ the serpentfor the way of God is first to overcome him, and then to expose him. And mention having been made by God of the two seeds, and of their antagonism, and of the results to each of that antagonism, Adam so drinks in the truth conveyed in God’s announcement, that he calls his wife’s name Eve, because she was the mother of all living. He apprehended that he was to live, as well as to die; but he also saw that this new life was to come through the woman and her seed, and not from himself. It is a truth to which all nature now bears witness, that “ in the midst of life we are in death but it is a truth which only God can reveal, and faith can grasp, that in the midst of death we are in life. His very raiment (for innocence was lost for ever) would, in type, suffice to signify as well how his sin could be covered, as how life and holiness could be obtained. Meanwhile, better that the old Adam should die, than that it should be perpetuated. It would appear to be suggested as if access to the tree of life was even then, as it is now, by means of the tree of knowledge. For this is life eternal, to know God and Jesus Christ. ®ljc TCor&’s Man hritlj ©nadj, ilje saint for Ijralmt. Genesis iv. and v. /^HAPTER IV. Here at once we see the amazing difference between the two seeds—the holy one hated and murdered, and the wicked his murderer. We are all aware that the fullest display of this hostility of the wicked towards the righteous and the holy is beheld in the Cross of the Son of God, and again in the rejec¬ tion of the Holy Ghost by the world now. For through that blessed Spirit Christ is formed in us ; and as the new life is developed in us, so it is opposed still and re¬ jected (Rom. viii. 36). Of the seed'of Cain there are many on the list whose names are identical with or similar to the sons of God (professing) in the next chapter. Compare chap. iv. 17, 18, with those whose names we find in chap. v. It is the same still. The greatest haters of God in the world have, many of them, been those who once pro¬ mised fair. But especially, as in chap, v., there seems a sort of climax reached in what is recorded of Enoch, and of his holy walk; so, conversely, here we have a hellish climax reached in what is, recorded of the lust, and murder, and scornful infidelity of Lamech, the descendant of Cain. For the patience of God ripens the saint and the sinner both. !5 The Lord's IVay with Lnocli. Chapter \, Here we have traced for us the line of the other seed. But whilst in chap. iv. Cain’s seed are beheld busy, making this world their home, and as com¬ fortable and as refined as, with skill in all arts, and the production of all sweet sounds, they can render it; albeit the blood of Abel, being left unavenged, was itself a witness of the curse resting on it: here, on the contrary, in chap, v., we have, indeed, the other seed mentioned, though without any record of their doings. Notwithstanding that their lifetime extended over seve¬ ral centuries, little is told us of them beyond that they lived, begat a family, and died. Surely this very silence is most telling. Nowadays, with the world’s heroes, three volumes are required for the narrative of one who lived till seventy years; here three verses suffice for the account of one who lived seven or nixie hundred ! As if Cain’s descendants made up all the world’s history ! But as to this other seed, it is implied that earth was not their home. The patriarchal funeral bell, “ And he died,” “And he died,” tolls eight times in this brief chapter. None of them reach quite up to a thousand years. For this we find is reserved for man on earth in millennial times. And hence we see that, even from the beginning, God had the end in view. Moreover, as we read that Lamecli lived after he begat Noah five hun¬ dred ninety and five years, whilst the flood was upon the earth in the six hundredth year of Noah s life, therefore Bamech lived within five years of that flood. Further, since we read that Methuselah lived after he begat Lamech seven hundred eighty and two years, whilst Lamech begat Noah when he was a hundred eighty and two years old, and therefore when Lamecli had six hundred years more to live, it follows that Methuselah died in the very year that the flood took 16 Typical Foreshadowings. place. How very nigh Scripture goes towards contra¬ dicting itself, and yet without its actually doing this ! Surely nothing but the truth, revealed by the Spirit of God, preserved the inspired writer here from inaccuracy of statement. Above I have remarked that the patriarchal funeral bell is heard to toll eight times in this chapter, and that all of these, from Adam to Lamech, eventually passed away hence. But there is one bright exception made in the mode in which this was done. Enoch is taken to heaven ere the deluge came; although whilst he pro¬ phesied of the Lord’s advent, he may have eyed the deluge impending as the precursor of a still more awful judg¬ ment now so near (Jude 14 and 15). On the other hand, Hoah passes quite through the deluge. Thus these two men, of each of whom it is recorded that he walked with God—as if it were one on each arm—these become a designed type of God’s two callings: of the one now being made, which is the heavenly calling, and to be closed by the rapture of the entire Church into the im¬ mediate presence of her Lord; the other, God’s earthly call in the future of a remnant of Israel, and of a multi¬ tude that no man can number out of all nations,* who will be kept for the appearing of Christ safely through the great tribulation presently to set in. How this walk¬ ing with God, of which here we read recorded of Enoch, denotes on God’s part, complacency, and on Enoch’s part, ease and peace. Likewise in Ephesians, clear direc¬ tions are afforded to us as to the heavenly character of our present walk, in view of the sure prospect of soon being called up on high. * In my Lecture on Rev. vii. I have proved the amazing dif¬ ference of the two classes of Jew and Gentile there from the Church of God. *7 The Lord’s Way with Enoch. Here, then, is our Hope set before us in figure. Like Enoch, we are to disappear from this world’s scene. We may be somewhat missed, but should be less desired. Like our Master, for all our service in it we reap onlv its hate and its contempt. It will be known that we have gone, and where, for the Beast will, when he has risen to power, turn into scorn the whole thing (Rev. xiii. 6) ; also many professors will, when it is too late, implore the Lord to open unto them (Luke xiii. 25). The living saints, those here at any period ere He returns, are they who are constantly represented in Scripture as those who may be caught away. For the Lord Jesus will descend from heaven with a shout of triumph and of joy. The Holy Ghost, who is only down here for a season, and in consequence of Christ’s supreme exaltation there, in order that He may whisper to those with listening ears of all that hidden glory of the Lord, will at once lift the entire Church into the divine pre¬ sence. His own know His voice now, and will recog¬ nize His signal then. They are drawn close together bv His wondrous story of the love of the uncreated Son of God, and in their gathering themselves together closely around Himself, are being thus formed into a Body and a Bride, and are at last gathered home unto Himself present still in their midst, as when down yonder in the world. Then they believed in His presence, and tasted somewhat of its sweetness; now He is visible before their very eyes—He Who for them hung in agony on the Cross. He has thus come on the road to meet us because He loves us so much, and because on us His heart is set. His prayer had proved the reality of His love; His Cross had gauged its depth. He did not come for Enoch j nor does He come when a believer dies. Then that saint departed to be with Him. But He 18 Typical Foreshadowings. comes for the Church—for us altogether, those whose bodies were held in the tomb, and for those who were like caged doves in those bodies of humiliation when He came. It is the will of God that all of us shall be glori¬ fied together; and until that time has arrived, we are sealed as God’s own, and have the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts. We are not of the world any more than, nay, not so much as, were those patriarchs mentioned in this chapter; for not only are we called with a heavenly calling, but more, we are the Church of the living God. We have perfect peace now through His finished work; we see Him representing us before our God, and we have this Holy Spirit already with us. In all these things our blessing very far exceeds that of these early saints. As to times and seasons, we know nothing, nor indeed do we wish to know. It is designed as a proof of His confiding love to us, that He has not made us acquainted with the time of His arrival. No loving wife would like the implication that she could not be trusted to be ready, with the hand on the latch, for her husband at any time. Besides which, this keeps us on the look-out from day to day, which pleases Him very much. This He tells us over and over again, as in Luke xii. 37. But though the time be hidden, still surely we must be conscious that the end of the Church’s course here has been nearly reached. And what a view this opens to us ! At any moment, the very next for aught we know, and we may be gone, at once and right up into His immediate pre¬ sence ; God Himself, the very next moment, engaged in the act of presenting us faultless before Him with exceeding joy. Here we may be at one moment in our daily avocations, and, or ever we are aware all this work of God’s fully accomplished. J 9 The Lord's Way with Enoch. True, much has to be done down here before the Lord can appear to the world. So the world ripened further for judgment after Enoch was taken home, until the two parties of religious and irreligious, both unsaved, became amalgamated. The very word “ I will destroy,” was not heard, nor a single timber of the ark placed with one other, until a long period subsequent to Enoch’s trans¬ lation. But this is not so material to us. Our home is a heavenly one. We are not looking for the day, nor yet for the appearance of the Sun of Righteousness, but for the Morning Star, which shines for a while anterior to the day, and which those who are up betimes and watching, only see. Whilst the Old Testament is closed with a refer¬ ence to the rising of the Sun of Righteousness, conversely the Lord Jesus, in the New, speaks of Himself as the Morn¬ ing Star. This distinction of itself reveals the difference of our calling from Israel’s. Yea more, whilst Malachi speaks of Israel treading the wicked under the soles of their feet, the Church, whose home is above the stars, is destined under its divine Archangel Michael to hurl Satan and his host from heaven (Rev. xii.) All this goes to show how in quite another sphere is our place and por¬ tion than on this earth. No, here we are pilgrims and strangers. And until we have left it, earth’s ripening in wickedness, and next its judgment and blessing, are delayed. The Holy Ghost Himself, who is our heavenly guide and companion, hinders the development of the man of sin and the full display of man’s apostacy (2 Thess. ii.) Satan needs not twenty centuries to produce this coming man. But he has to wait till God’s purposes concerning us, and our calling, and our training, and our chastening here below are all completed. It is not said here that Enoch ascended into Heaven, nor do we find anywhere else that our rapture is so / 20 Typical Foreshadowings ., termed. This is only fully true of Christ’s own path to His pristine home, denoting as it does majesty and stateliness in the mode of His departure. Enoch was «taken.” “We are to be caught up,” or rapt away by the Spirit as Philip was, only in our case to our home and to our God and Father and to the Lord Jesus. Some object to the word “ rapture,” but it is the very word used in the Greek to describe this thing. For rapture is properly a Latin word formed by metathesis from this word here. Thus we only keep close to Scripture in so speaking. (Tbr ICorii's Wag hull) Utmlj. tiir saint for tl)£ sartlj. Section I. Boah, preuiuus tu the Deluge. Genesis vi.—viii. 19. /^HAPTER VI., to Ver. 13. That which is bom of the flesh is flesh. It does not follow because one is a saint that his children are also and all of them saints. Too well, alas ! we know the contrary. These patriarchs, mentioned by name in chap, v., may have been, and probably were, all truly acquainted with God themselves ; but each of them begat children, and there is no proof that their children all followed in their parents’ faith. It should be understood that at the beginning of the world’s course, these two seeds, to wit, those of the openly wicked (in chap, iv.), and those of the sons of God, were not only separated as to the latter professing godliness, and as to the former scorning it; but there appears to have been a local distance maintained, for a while, between the two parties. The one hovered still on the outskirts of Eden, where were the Cherubim and the Shechinah ; the other, even in Cain’s own time, “ went out,” as the Scripture itself informs us, from the pre¬ sence of the Lord. But in process of time, as the two parties multiplied, and the seed of Cain and the seed of Seth were each much increased, the advanced habita- i 22 Typical Fore shadowings. tions of the one would approximate to the nearest dwell¬ ings of the other. For it is not likely that Cain’s seed went much further away than out of the view of Eden. And then the one line, the sons of God professing, be¬ held the daughters * of men that they were fair. Mes¬ sengers,f or angels, would soon pass from the one party to the other, and enticed by the beauty of their women, abandon their own local nearness to Eden and to the Shechinah, and fix their dwelling-place among their new friends. The result is not left in doubt. Marriages of these who had formerly been in separation the one from the other prevailed at length, and to that extent, that amalgamation of the two seeds, the Sethite and the Cainite, followed. The one line thus proved that, how¬ ever lineally descended from Seth, they were not spiritu¬ ally his true seed. But separation, as witness for God, abandoned, then came the deluge. After that, corruption and violence J had broken down all the barriers dividing between the * The term “ men,” here is used in a bad sense, as the word “ world ” is now. Cain’s seed were the “ men” ; they made up all the world’s history. Their “ daughters ” are specially men¬ tioned for the part they played in the sin that followed. f Thus simply may be interpreted that somewhat obscure passage in Jude 6. Then the “ angels ” here are identical with “ the sons of God ” in Gen. vi. 2 Peter ii. 4 seems to confirm this interpretation of the word “ angel,” since he goes on, in the very next verse, to speak of the deluge. Now that these “ sons of God ” were human, overwhelming evidence will be afforded a little further on above. And as to the word “ angel,” the English reader should be informed that this term is often used in Greek where men are undoubtedly signified. Thus the messengers that John sent to Christ are so named, in Luke vii. 24. So the disciples that the Lord sent to a village of the Samaritans, to make ready for Him, are such (see Luke ix. 52) X Corruption and violence are the two'' forms that sin takes. In Prov. i. wisdom warns of violence; chap, ii., of corruption. 23 The Lord’s Way with Noah. two parties; then God, in exact retributive judgment, removed the barriers that restrained the flood of waters from the earth. In the 12th and 13th verses of chap, vi., this sin of men, and this consequent judgment of Gfod, are linked together. The emphasis is lost in the authorized Version through the one Hebrew word being rendered in ver. 12 “ corrupt,” and in ver. 13, “ destroy.” There is a striking allusion to this very passage, and to this use of one and the same word for the sin of men and for the judgment of God, in 1 Cor. iii. 17, where again, most unfortunately, the idea suggested by the Holy Ghost is lost sight of by two different renderings in Eng¬ lish of one and the same Greek word : “ If any one mar the temple of God ( [i.e ., by blending the two seeds to¬ gether, or by upsetting God’s own order in His house), “ God will mar him.” The one word in the two clauses shows that the particular judgment is for that particular sin. So here, “ all flesh had marred its way on the earth ” (ver. 12), and God said, “ I will mar them with the earth ” (ver. 13). But some will have it that these sons of God were celestial angels. Now, in proof that the true idea suggested in the passage is the abandonment of sepa¬ ration unto God of the Sethite seed, the whole of the descendants of Adam becoming all united together; and note that wherever a union based on compromises, and then of amalgamation, is affected, this can only be by the avowed witnesses for God forsaking their high standing, for the other side have nothing to surrender— in proof, I say, that these sons of God here spoken of were human, I submit the following considerations. Let them all be viewed as a whole, and surely conviction ought to follow. 1. Turn to the last two verses of Luke iii. There 24 Typical Foreshadowings. you have the Sethite line traced backwards, “ Methuselah was the son of Enoch, who was the son of Jared, who was the son of Maleleel, who was the son of Cainan, who was the son of Enos, who was the son of Seth, who was the son of Adana, who was the son of God." Thus the Sethite line is headed up by Adam as son of God. In other words, here we have the line of the sons of God. Cain’s line was the line of the children of men. 2. Matthew (xxii. 30) informs us that God’s angels are incapable of marriage, as also the children of the resur¬ rection will be. 3. Angels are spirits (ITeb. i. 7). But spirits have not flesh nor bones either, as Christ explains in Luke xxiv. 39. Now combine these Scriptures with proof No. 2 above. Eor, putting these two passages to¬ gether, we learn that angels have not flesh; and in Matt. xxii. 30, that they have no sexes. Now, in proof that the term “ angel ” is frequently used in the Greek Testament, where men are certainly meant, I have quoted two instances in a note at page 22. But because this point is important, as conducive to a right understanding of the subject, I cite here two more. In James ii. 25, the messengers that Rahab received are called “angels.” So again in the Greek of Matt. xi. 10, John the Baptist is termed an “ angel.” Putting side by side all this Scrip¬ ture evidence, it seems to me to sweep quite away the argument, such as it is, drawn from the word “ other,” or “ strange flesh,” in Jude 6 ; and the obvious meaning is, that the professing sons of God left their own Sethite side and place, allured by the daughters of the Cainite or serpent race. 4. Matthew (xxiv. 38), speaking of the days before the flood, states that they were eating and drinking, marry¬ ing and giving in marriage. Here there seems a glance 25 The Lord’s Way with Noah . back to tbe account in Genesis, and to the various modes of fleshly self-indulgence in which men spent their days. 5. On a comparison of the last-cited Scripture with Luke xvii. 27, contrasted with verse 28, the probability ripens into certainty. Of those living in Noah’s days, it is there said: “ They did eat, they drank ; they married, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark,” etc. But in the next verse, the language is varied, certainly not without design. For there, speak¬ ing of the days of Lot, the Lord omits all reference to the Sodomites’ marriages and of their being given in marriage. Now this very variation as to how the men of Sodom were occupied, as contradistinguished from the manner of life of those in Noah’s time, Droves that the Lord calls distinct attention to the crowning sin of those antediluvians. But surely in neither Matt. xxiv. 38, or in Luke xvii. 27, is there the remotest thought of angelic sin. 6. And what heavenly angels can here be alluded to? Had they been the holy angels, they would not thus have acted ; if the confederates of Satan, how could they be called “sons of God”? Moreover, these “angels,” Jude witnesses, are in prison for their sin; but the fallen angels are still at large, and will not finally be cast out of heaven until the rapture of the Church into heaven (Rev. xii.). 7. Already I have shown above the connection between the sin committed and the judgment inflicted by the Holy Ghost, using one single word for these two in the Hebrew of Gen. vi. 12, 13; and again, by a single word for the parallel sin and punishment of Christendom, in 1 Cor. iii. 17. But if the guilty party were indeed heavenly angels, either good or bad, then the wrong 2 6 Typical Foreshadowings. party was punished. For unquestionably it was the race of men, as well the Sethites as the Cainites—Noah and his family only excepted—that was swept away by the deluge. But how likely, how righteous the judgment, if by these professing “ sons of God ” be signified the Sethites, who had become savourless salt. 8. I think it very probable, as Bunyan* suggests, that Balaam hence got his idea as to how he would ruin Israel, by inducing them to abandon their separation through intermarriage with the Midianites. In his pro¬ phecies to Balak he had testified of Israel’s grandeur in testimony for God, by “ dwelling alone, and not being numbered among the nations.” This silent witness for their God he would set aside, and thus devote them to destruction, which he had failed to accomplish by cursing them. Traditionary relics of the deluge would still be rife in his day, as even now among the heathen such are found. 9. All this is often met by the scornful question, how such marriages as of Sethite with Cainite would pro¬ duce “giants.” It does not seem very wonderful that the children of the holy and the chaste should have healthier bodies than the impure should have. But I might return the question, and ask how it can be proved that the seed of angels aud of men should necessarily be a race of giants. There is no Scripture in proof of this. Ou the contrary, Matt. xxiv. 38, aud Luke xvii. 27, are quite opposed, as we have seen, to such a view. In the anti¬ type, now fulfilling before our eyes, the answer is very clear j and the answer carries with it the proof that, in our days, both parties are certainly human. For who are the giants nowadays ? Those who pretend to be of * See a long quotation from Bunyan on this point in the ,f Javelin of Phinehas,” pp. 474, 475. 27 The Lord’s IVay with Noah. a more heavenly and holy line than the world to which they are joined. Those who use a form of godliness to help themselves on in this world. Those in whom much of the hero-worship of the day is centred. Those who, however great they are in the religious world now, their names as “ men of renown ” had never been heard of, but for their fleshly piety. Lastly, if these giants had been really half-castes, partly angelic as to their origin and partly human, how would they stand towards Him, the Saviour of the world, who lays not hold of angels, but of the seed of Abraham (Heb. ii.) ? I have tarried somewhat on this passage, because of its extreme importance, and have sought to remove from the reader’s mind any bias in favour of an interpretation which blunts its point, at a time, too, when its solemn warning demands special attention. For Laodiceanism, as we are expressly informed in Rev. iii., is the very last guise that the nominal church assumes ere it is spued out of Christ’s month. The commingling of hot water and cold, the form of godliness without the power—-nay, more, the denial of the power thereof, self-content and self-complacency with one’s own state, albeit Christ is shut out, as here in Genesis, God was esteemed a stranger, and all witness for Him abandoned; these, surely, are the marks of the religion of the day. And thus the opening verses of Genesis vi., which trace the real and proximate cause of the deluge, resemble the inspired portraits of the present time, as in Rev. iii. 15, or 2 Tim. iii., and all contribute to prove how near its end the age has come. As the Lord predicted, so has it come to pass : “ As it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be in the days of the Son of Man.” May we be looking for Enoch’s God to take us to Himself, and heed this warning, and be ready for His signal. So shall 28 Typical ForeshadoivinQS. we have disappeared hence, and have at last reached our home yonder, and be shut in eternally with God, ere the world’s sin has fully ripened, and the vials of His wrath be at last poured out upon it! % Chapter YI. 14, to VIII. 19. But ISoah, who repre¬ sents the saints to be preserved for the earth, finds grace in the eyes of the Lord. God had looked out upon the earth; and He who had once- seen all good, now sees all to be evil. He is grieved at His heart. Let this affecting remark penetrate us through and through. However plenteous He is in goodness and mercy towards them that fear Him, sin is eternally abhorrent to His nature. But what had been said ot‘ Enoch is here repeated of Noah. Never does He confound the righteous, however few they may be, with the wicked. Only Noah, as the type of the saints for the earth, is not removed from the scene of judgment and taken up to God. He is to pass through all that is impending, safely sheltered in the ark. As for this ark, clearly it was God's own thought alone. He likewise gave minute directions as to all its details. Nothing was left for Noah’s ingenuity. It was not we who found Christ as One who could save us. If God had not told us, never should we have known that He had a co-equal Son at all. He laid help on One mighty ; and whatever Christ is now to us, is owing to God’s provision and appointment. Eorinstauce: Was the ark to be made of gopher or cypress wood? In this very selection there is, I think, some reference to the shelter to be found in Christ. I am more confirmed in this by the fact that the word here twice rendered “ pitch,” is called in the Hebrew “ copher!”* And then * The word copher, inExod. xxi. 30, xxx. 12, and Isa. xliii. 3, ie rendered ransom. It is found in the plural in Exod. xxix. 36, 29 The Lord’s Way with Noah. the passage reads, “ Make thee an ark of gopher wood ; and thou shalt copher it within and without with copher.” For these Hebrew words are allied to our English one “cover.” And thus we are reminded of that precious and frequent phrase in the New Testament—“in Christ.” In Him only can we be sheltered from the wrath to come. In Him only can we be carried through the region of death and judgment into resurrection life (John v. 24). So when all was ready, after the exhibition of divine patience and forbearance with the ungodly for a hundred and twenty years, during which the preaching of Noah, at least, in pictured action, as the ark was slowly fas¬ hioned according as God had directed, then the Lord said unto Noah, Come thou and all thy house into the ark. Likewise, the Lord has called us who believe in Christ and has safely sheltered ns in Christ, though as yet the door is not closed. In 1 Peter iii. 18—21 is a most remarkable passage, drawing lessons from the scene before us, for our instruc- tion. There three things are ascribed to God, as working by His Spirit. (1) He spake by His Spirit in Noah to the antediluvians, who, however some may have been impressed with the sight of the huge vessel slowly approaching completion, or others who mocked and said, “ to-morrow shall be as this day,” all ultimately persisted in disregarding the warning message, and are now for their obstinacy consigned to prison, there awaiting their final and terrible doom. (2) Again, by that same Spirit, He quickened Christ who had been put to death. And now again, (3) a similar message is sent to the world xxx. 10, 16 ; Lev. xxiii. 27, xxv. 9, and is translated atonement. In Exod. xxv. 17, xxx. 6, and xxxi. 7, the same word radically is rendered mercy-seat. 30 Typical Foreshadow lags. through us who believe, as was sent of old through Noah, and some by grace having been drawn by the Spirit are saved in Christ and identified with Him, even as those who in a ship go both down and up in it. Only in our case, as we well know, the waves of wrath were poured out upon Him alone. The waters of baptism into which we descend testify of our death, burial, and resurrection in Him. True, the corn of heavenly Wheat was alone till It had died (John xiii. 24). But there in death, though not before, It had reached us, particles as it were of earthly mould. So It gathers us to Itself. Then in Him we all rise together (see also Rom. vi.; and Col. ii., iii.) And He who has called us to Himself, will perfect that which concerneth us. His call of us is not by any means a call for once and then over. We are to abide in Him and to walk in Him. That is to say, His call is continuous and daily. As He once said “ Light become, and light became,” that call perpetuating light unto this day; so that call of His to us is extending to our affections, our hearts, even to our very eyes and hands. And for our comfort let us remember that whilst the ark rested on the bleak and craggy mountains of Ararat; we have been already in spirit and shall be soon in body brought home unto our Father and our God. Hence, one window only was there to the ark, namely at the top thereof. For now our eye is to be directed upward unto God. Worship, praise, and thanksgiving, with habitual living in His presence ; these are what become us who are saved in Christ. For the deluge imminent then and now are God’s own work. “ Behold, I, even I, do bring a flood.” He that provided the ark is the same as He who brought the deluge. He that has found for us Christ, will presently pour out His unmitigated fury on all unbelievers. Mercy and judg- 3 l The Lord’s IVay with Noah. meat are each among His treasures. Most men now, as of old, scorn God’s perfect way of salvation by death, burial, and resurrection in Christ, and so by the passage out of a doomed world into another, where there is no condemnation, the judgment having been all expended, exhausted for those in Christ, by Him. Nay, sad to say, some of those who do believe, unwisely scorn the instruc¬ tive figure—to wit, the baptism itself. There is a singular coincidence here, but one on which I may not tarry. I just mention it and pass on. Like as God waited seven days after the door of the ark was shut ere He let loose the waters of the deluge upon men ; and again, as there was a like pause of seven days between the warning to Pharaoh concerning the slaughter of the first-born and that slaughter itself (compare Exod. xi. with xii. 15) ; so there will certainly elapse seven years, between the rapture of the Church to be with Christ, and His subsequent appearing to execute judg¬ ment on the world. This is that notable period of which we read so much in the Revelation of twice twelve hundred and sixty days. In fact, this said period is iden¬ tical, as others have shown, with the last week of Daniel’s severity weeks of years. Regarding the completeness of the judgment, when at last God arose to execute vengeance, surely such texts as vii. 19, and viii. 5, are adequate testimony to those who bow to the authority of Scripture. The waters reached a height fifteen hundred feet higher than Mont Blanc. Otherwise, had there been some parts of the earth uncovered by the waters, thither could the birds have retreated. Another proof of the universality of the deluge we have in the designed inversion in the list of all flesh slain in vii. 21, with 23. In the former verse, the order followed in the account oi the animals that 32 Typical Foreshadowings. perished is thus given, “ fowl, cattle, beast, every creep¬ ing thing, and every manbut in the latter verse the order traced is, “ man, cattle, the creeping things and fowl.” Here, surely, is a warning to every one great or small, that there is only one shelter from the day of the Lord’s anger. (Read here Rev. xx. 11—15.) There seems no reason to doubt that the day of the ark resting on the mountain of Ararat is identical with the day on which the Lord rose from the dead. It rested “ on the seventeenth day of the seventh month.” But by the commandment of the Lord, given at the time of the institution of the feast of the Passover, the seventh month was changed into the first month. Then three days after the Passover, which was on the fourteenth day of the month, the Lord, having passed quite through the waters of judgment, stood in resurrection in the midst of His disciples, saying, “Peace be unto you.” They, as well as Himself, had reached the haven of ever¬ lasting rest. But though we now who believe are not iu the flesh, yet is the flesh in us, and will be so until we are changed, even as to our bodies to be altogether like Him. Hence, sure as the unclean raven and the pure dove both issued forth from this ark, so do the motions of the flesh and those of the spirit proceed forth from us. The two natures co-exist in every Christian. But the dove returns with an olive branch. Oh, joy ! the Earnest of the heavenly glory we do obtain, and enjoy even now. When we live after the Spirit, and walk in the Spirit, we constantly find that heaven is far from being wholly a future thing. The Spirit of God brings us even now foretastes of that new and better world, into which by grace we have already been intro¬ duced (see 1 Cor. ii. 9—12). Then at last God says to Noah, “ Go forth of the ark.” This word it is most 33 The Lord’s Way with Noah. important we should observe. For much oftener do we hear of being shut in and so sheltered from the wrath to come, than of- having been brought forth, according to the will of God, into this new, this heavenly region by the Lord Jesus. And even still He is sitting, accord¬ ing as the Lord bade Him sit at His own right hand, and will do so till God shall bid Him rise. I mean that in His continuous session at the right hand of God, His is continuous persistent obedience. But when God’s time has come, Christ will come forth and take us at last and for ever to dwell yonder with our God and with His blessed Son ! 3 ®Ij£ Xor&’s cfttan itritlj iioalj, tljr saint for tljc rartl). Section II. detail, subsequent tu the deluge* Genesis viii. 20, ix. /'"'HAPTER VIII. 20, to end of IX. There can be no question in the mind of a careful reader of this sec¬ tion of Scripture, that these verses as thus specified ought he kept together. For chap, ix., beginning where it to does in the authorized translation, interferes greatly with the full appreciation of the teaching herein conveyed. That is to say, when Noah had builded the altar, and had offered burnt-offerings, so that the Lord smelled a sweet savour, then two verses at most suffice to set forth what the Lord will not repeat in the way of judgment; whilst all the first seventeen verses of the next chapter are occupied with the declaration of what God now can and will do in the way of blessing. And all this is shown to be in consequence of the offering of sweet-smelling savour! Here, too, it should not escape notice that the voice of God alone is heard. Eor through Christ’s offer¬ ing, God has all His own way in grace and mercy. Him¬ self fills the entire scene. Hence He assigns the iden¬ tical reason why He will not destroy the earth again by the waters of a flood, as before He had given why He must curse the earth (viii. 21, with vi. 5). So, likewise, 35 The Lord’s PVay with Noah. when presently the earth has been purged by fire, God is heard soliloquizing complacently with Himself in Rev. xxi. 5—7. And the fact that this close connection of chap. ix. with the close of chap, viii., and the burnt- offering of sweet-smelling savour is so continually missed, as it has evidently been by those who inserted chap. ix. in the middle of God’s utterance in response to that odour which He smelled, affords another illustration how Christians themselves often see little more, and are con¬ tented to see no more, than the negative value of the blood of Christ in lifting us from hell, than the negative side of all God’s action in grace towards us. Three points in these first seventeen verses of chap, ix. demand each a word of remark. Here at the outset of the post-diluvian world’s course, God establishes for the “ good ” of His saints, the principle of government (Rom. xiii. 4). And this, His own institution, He has in mercy continued down to the present day. Viewed in this light, it is a coincidence that quickly after the rapture of the church into heaven, the Lord begins to open the seals, causing the overthrow of the thrones of the Roman empire, whereby fierce democracy and anarchy prevail, and from which come forth the terrible beast and his ten kings of the book of Revelation. For it is well that the Jews and the world, having rejected the true King, should know a little of the sort of rule which they have preferred, and of the good time coming, of which their infidel poets have sung. And thus this present dispensation of rule as far as respects the world dates from Noah. Never since that patriarch s day has God once interfered with the course ol this age (Luke xvii. 28). And right in between these two interferences of God—on the one hand by the deluge of water, and on the other by the Lord’s appearing in flaming fire—stands gfi Typical Foreshadowings. the cross of the Lord Jesus Christ, a witness to all men, that however patient God may show Himself to be, sin cannot eventually go unpunished. Secondly, we read here of His covenant which He made with Noah, and which, in so far as there is aught of grace in it, is taken from that far larger and better covenant made with Christ, and which, through the blood of His cross, has become to us a testament * of fullest, richest grace. And then, thirdly, we read of the token of that covenant, “ the faithful witness in heaven,” as God’s bow in the cloud is termed in Ps. lxxxix. 37. And now in this symbol of that covenant, there is a hint of grace. Por the bow is directed towards heaven, and arrow to it there is none, as if it had been discharged heaven¬ wards. Compare Gen. xlix. 23, referring to the rejection of Joseph, the type of Christ, as king. And surely we who are gathered to the Lord and to His name every Lord’s-day, to break bread and to drink of the cup which He enjoined us to do, cannot but recall to mind that that cup is itself a token, and a precious one, of the blood of the new testament shed for us. The remaining verses of this ninth chapter afford us ample evidence that fallen man is a total wreck—that judgments, however awful and sweeping in their charac¬ ter, may awe him, but do not change him, and that his only resource and salvation is God Himself. He ever fails in that which he has aught to do with. So Judges ii. ; 1 Kings xi.; Acts xx. 29, 30; 2 Tim.; ltev. ii. and iii. , all confirm the sad truth first found out in Eden, that whenever God has set up aught for man’s blessing, sure as its charge is committed to man, he ever spoils it. * See my Leaflet on this subject of Covenant and Testament, First Series, No. . The Lord's Way with Noah. 37 But God blesses Shem, and, through Shem’s seed, Japheth also. “Blessed of the Lord God is Shem . . . God shall enlarge Japheth, but He shall dwell in the tents of Shem.” So Hebrew of verses 26, 27. He will give deliverance, or redemption, to Japheth ; but He will pitch His tabernacle with Shem. Compare Exod. xxv. 8 ; Ps. cii. 13—16; John i. 14. Chapters X. and XI. In casting our eye over chap. x. we at once observe that the Holy Ghost tells us of the descendants of Japheth and of Ham, ere He traces those of Shem. This is His ordinary way, to keep the best till the last. Precisely the same order will be found in the opening chapters of the first book of Chronicles, where the lists of divers genealogies are given us in full. But we shall have a very vivid evidence of this way of the Lord, when we come to consider chap, xxxvi. pre¬ ceding chap, xxxvii. For the present, therefore, let us pass from this subject. The main lesson of this entire section is, that as God proceeds to develop His plan for the blessing of man, man, intent on present aggrandisement and power, ever opposes Him. The key to what we read here is to be found in Deut. xxxii. 8 , where Moses states what was the design of God when He separated the sons of Adam, according as we find unfolded here. See Gen. x. verses 5, 20, 25, 31. The passage cited from Deuteronomy tells us that “when the most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when He separated the sons of Adam, He set the bounds of the peoples (Hebrew) according to the number of the children of Israel. For the Lord’s portion is His people; Jacob is the lot of His inherit¬ ance.” For when Israel went into Egypt, the number of souls was seventy (Gen. xlvi. 2/). So in Gen. x. / 38 Typical Foreshadowings. there is mention of seventy nations, to wit: from Japheth, fourteen ; from Ham, thirty 5 and from Shem, twenty-six. The seventy disciples sent out by the Lord Jesus may have an eye to this arrangement of His, which shall yet obtain when His kingdom is set up in power, in the millennium. For man may be allowed, apparently, to retard the execution of His purpose, as he does here, but never ultimately to defeat it. Now that this state¬ ment in Heut. xxxii. is millennial, is evident from the name God there takes of Most High, equivalent to the new testament language of King of kings, and Lord of lords (Rev. xix.). Hence, in Ps. Ixxxiii., Messiah, after subduing the nations, and quelling all opposition reigns as “ Most High over all the earth.” See, too, Ps. xci., and what is said of Melchizedek, as in Gen. xiv. 18, 19. Therefore, as we ponder this explanation of a part of His ways, as revealed to us in these verses of Deut. xxxii., we perceive that the will of God, in estab¬ lishing the earth’s blessing, was to group the various nations round Israel as a centre; only Israel, as the medium of this blessing, and so the best, the favoured nation, kept in reserve till the last, till all was ready. And hence the line of the true Seed is traced on, at the end of chap, xi., from Shem to Abram, from whom Israel, and Israel’s king, Messiah, was to come. Hence, also, special attention is called to the fact that Eber’s son was called Peleg, because “ in his days was the earth divided.” And so, too, at the close of the list of the sons of Japheth, and of the list of the sons of Canaan, 3 on of Ham, and of the list of the sons of Shem, e g., in verses 5, 18, and 32, this said division of the lands, and the bor¬ ders thereof, are respectively marked out as appertaining to the several families of Noah’s sons. How beautiful and perfect this way of God! How thoughtful for 39 The Lord's Way with Noah. Israel, even ere it nationally existed, with tlie divine smile resting finally on Israel’s future King! Yet these chapters (x. and xi.) also witness how rebel man was allowed to interfere, and to delay, the revelation of God’s purpose. Kor, now, observe how verses 8 to 12 of chap. x. are inserted; as if what they narrated formed a block as to the development of this counsel: so much so, indeed, that if these verses are not read as a parenthesis, the reader may fail to see the scope of these chapters. Then, in the first nine verses of chap, xi., a continuation of . 1 I this parenthetic account of man’s wickedness is found. So the two parentheses, to wit, chap. x. 8—12, with chap. xi. 1—9, we had better combine. Outside these said parentheses the chapters form a long-continued line of the descendants of Noah down to the time of Abram. As to the former passage in chap. x. 8—12, revealing the guilty way of ambitious man in obstructing earth’s blessing from God, the ringleader is appropriately termed Nimrod, or a rebel. This name seems evidently assigned to him as the clue to his entire career. And here com¬ pare a scripture or two which speak of the great rebel at the close of this dispensation, “ whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of His mouth, and destroy with the brightness of His coming.” He is called “ the law¬ less one ” in 2 Thess. ii. 8, Greek; and “ the wilful king ” in Dan. xi. 36. It is suggested that there is something peculiar in his rise. “ He began to be mighty.” So 1 Chron. i. 10. He struggled for pre¬ eminence, and, by dint of indomitable will, he attained it. In the passage in 1 Chronicles, and thrice here, he is called “ mighty,” a word of evil omen when spoken of men in opposition to Christ,’the most Mighty (see 40 Typical Foreshadowings. Gen. vi. 4). So of Goliath in 1 Sam. xvii. 51, Hebrew. He shoots up above all his fellows, and spreads himself like a green bay-tree in all directions, save only that Babylon is the innermost circle of his power. In verse 10 mention is made of four of his cities, all in the land of Shinar, with Babel by name put first. It reminds one of the four Babylonish kingdoms in Dan. ii. and vii., with which there is, no doubt, some designed prophetic connection. Compare my remarks further on as to the four kings whom Abram, the Hebrew, overcame and slew in Gen. xiv. These last we shall quickly perceive to be clearly representative of Babylon, Persia, Greece, and Rome. Then from Shinar he, Nimrod, goes forth unto Assyria, and builds Nineveh (see margin), and other great cities. “ He was a mighty hunter before the Lord.” Possibly beginning with hunting the savage beast, his skill and his renown here assist and incite him to subjugate his fellows. The special opposition to the Lord’s will throughout this dispensation, and fully developing as it nears its close, is rendered easier in its winning over of many souls by the plausible and specious pretexts of necessity, or of advantage, by which it is defended. For obedience certainly brings us into difficulties which wil¬ fulness at once cuts through. Something singular and bold in his defiance is certainly noted by the expression “ before the Lord.” And the little Antichrists in the church of God all through this age, who, wittingly or unwittingly, constitute themselves the centre, and even, to some extent, the object of the worship of their ad¬ mirers, and that, too, where the name of the Lord alone should be all—all the wickedness of these will reach its apex in the worship of the beast of Rev. xiii. Begin¬ ning with Babylonish apostasy, it culminates in open 4i The Lord’s Way with Noah. opposition, and is only destroyed by the Lord’s appear¬ ing. In verse 9 we find be made to himself a name famous for many generations following, even as the giants whom we have considered in Gen. vi. became “ men of renown.” Likewise Dathan and Abiram were “famous in the congregation” in their day (Num. xxvi. 9) ; as also the two hundred and fifty princes in the assembly were “ famous ” too, and “ men of renown ” (Num., xvi. 2). Ab ! it is this terrible love of fame, it is this unwillingness to be content with the Lord’s smile here, and with the crown of glory when He comes, which have led to so much striving and restless ambi¬ tion even in the professing church itself, that has wrought mischief irreparable. Hence, Babel is the pre¬ sent result. See Micah v. 6, where Babylon is called “the land of Nimrod.” Then, in the second parenthesis in Gen. xi. 1—9, we are instructed as to the mode by which Babel was built, which Babel was the centre of those dynasties men¬ tioned in chap. ix. 10—12, set up, be it remembered, in opposition to the government which God had designed through Israel and Israel’s future King. So in like manner now there is a Babylon still, who has daughters or religions confederacies many, more or less iufecttd by the ecclesiastical virus that has come from Rome, and all of whom must perish ere the true church of God, with Christ at its head, can be displayed before creation. The builders of Babel, as again here most solemnly we read, were actuated by the desire for a name, and to avoid the being scattered, as to their carnal minds ap¬ peared would be the case, unless they themselves and their city became men’s centre. But every way that is not God’s must end in utter confusion. He that gathers 42 Typical Foreshadowings . not with Christ, making Christ alone the attraction whereby souls shall be drawn together, however in¬ genious the method, and however the device may seem to prosper for a while, in the end every such worker does but scatter. Look at the church ; behold it, alas ! all divided and broken up. The cause is easily traceable. Under favourite leaders, men of renown, professing Christians will range themselves. Then Clerisy—whether avowed or unavowed is immaterial'—Clerisy begets Pre¬ lacy, Prelacy leads to Popery, and Popery will end in Antichristiani sm. It is said that in every known tongue some Hebrew can be found. This is not improbable. But certainly in every sect there is some truth that is contended for ; but these particles of truth all radiate from Christ. Tne only divine mode of union is therefore by clinging alone to Christ, the Truth. The builders of Babel, we learn, journeyed from the East; that is to say, from whence the Dayspring from on high doth visit men. Babel’s builders cannot but err, whatever truth they hold; for in their building, in their ecclesiastical organizations, the name of the Lord is not esteemed as amply sufficient. Hence, in their cleverness, they resort to brick for stone, which is man’s work, instead of God’s; and, again, for mortar they have slime, which in Hebrew denotes a com¬ pound formed of the corruption of animal and vegetable substances. In Babylon there is the semblance of the church, and of the divine ordinances; but the whole is corrupt, the whole must perish, however it may for the present afford men tranquillity and security (chap. xi. 2). Better now suffer with Christ, that when His kingdom is established in joy and peace, we may, through grace, be found worthy to reign with Him. It is to Him that this very chapter goes on in the after verses to point. 43 The Lord’s Way with Noah. God cannot be baulked, nor Christ ultimately set aside. All creative good can only come through Him. Nothing but loss can ensue where Christ, who is God’s one Centre in heaven and on earth, is unac¬ knowledged. Put what you may instead of Him, and you become a rebel, and your work Babylonish in its aim and end. l Itortf s Wan hritlj JUrraljant, t!j£ IBdteter, Section I. Abraham's call ta Canaan, His blessing bg fftel- cbisedeh, after the slaughter af the kings, Genesis xii.—xiv. /CHAPTERS XII. to XIY. At the opening of my remarks I stated that the entire history in Genesis clusters round what is recorded of the Lord’s dealings with seven representative men—Adam, figure of Christ; Enoch and Noah, who set forth the two distinctive calls of God, now of some to heaven, and presently of others to earth; Abraham, the believer, the father of believers; Isaac, the son; Jacob, the servant; Joseph, the ruler. These seven men appear subdivided into three and four. We have briefly touched upon the way of God with each of the first three. We come now to look at His varying action with the first of the last four—varying according as Abraham is trustful and obedient, or whether he gets away from God, and falls into sin. And surely to study how the Lord gradually led on Abraham step by step from one degree of faith to another, culminating in his ready obedience to offer up his only-begotten son, the child of promise, at the call of God, seeing that we too are exhorted to grow in the knowledge of God, that we too are believers, who should be learning to trust 45 The Lord’s JL^ay with Abraham. Him more implicitly and more obediently every year and month of our lives, surely in this growth of faith we cannot but be much helped by carefully observing the Lord’s way with Abraham. The Lord’s call of Abram was “ alone.’’ It was a personal call, as He Himself says in Isa. li. 2. Abram en¬ deavoured to bring Terah, his father, with him, and suc¬ ceeded in inducing Lot, his nephew, to be his companion. It is quite in the style of Scripture to say that Terah took Abram, rendering honour, of course, to the senior (chap. xi. 31). But Terah seems to have been a weight upon him, a hindrance to his own full obedience. For Terah died in Haran; and though probably years were spent in that half-way place between Ur and Canaan to which he had been called out, he does not appear to have heard any further word from God until that call of His had been fully and quite obeyed. This call of Abram was made by God’s revelation of Himself as the God of glory. In Ur, where Abram heard that call, he had been an.idolater, worshipping probably the sun, moon, and host of heaven (Joshua xxiv. 2). And notwithstanding that there were only ten generations from Shem to Abram, and that Shem lived four hundred years after he begat Arphaxad, and therefore at least seventy years after Abram was born, still this family, from which, too, the Messiah was to come, had become sunk into pagan darkness. But the light of the glory of God beams on Abram, whereby he at once dis¬ cerns the vanity of idols, and the greatness of the living God. That sight of God, and that electing grace and call of God, start him. Thus too with us is faith pro¬ duced, even by a sight of God in Christ. There is, there can be, no other way for faith. In the call of God to Abram there was the gospel; 4 6 Typ ical Foresh ado wings . for in Gal. iii. 8 this third verse of Gen. xii. is quoted, and it is affirmed that the gospel is comprised in it. For when all the families of the earth were to be blessed in Abram, the Holy Ghost witnesses in Galatians that the blessing is absolute and unconditional, apart from cir¬ cumcision, or aught else of man’s merit. Presently he arrives in Canaan. His foot is on the land which is to be his “for a possession” (Acts vii.) True, the Canaanite is still there, even as wicked spirits are yet in those heavenly places to which we have been called in Christ (Eph. vi.) But we w r ait God’s time for the return of His Son, when we shall be put into ever¬ lasting and complete enjoyment of our blessing. Even now already there in heaven only can we worship (Heb. x. 19), even as for the first time do we also now read of Abram building an altar—that is to say, in Canaan. He moves to and fro in this the land of promise; for, as w r as said to Joshua at a later period, “ Every spot ” that the sole of his foot rested on there, w r as his. If where Christ now is—in the presence of God, in heaven—is our place of blessing, there should we live and move, and there, in spirit and affection, should we be daily— despite of the foe, who will be turned out by Christ as Michael with His heavenly saints, whose battle-cry, as they hurl Satan down thence for ever, will be “ the blood of the Lamb !” The order carefully mentioned as to the “ altar,” “tent,” and “altar,” in verses 7 and 8, deserves more attention than it has generally received. Howard, the philanthropist, was wont to say, “ Wherever I have a tent, there God shall have an altar.” This was pious, but it w T as not up to God’s mark. Christians now, who know somewhat of the peremptory will of God as to being gathered to the name of the Lord alone, will often, 47 The Lord’s Way with Abraham for earthly considerations, remove their dwelling beyond the reach of their worshipping with the assembly of God. First selecting some situation more advantageous, as regards ease and comfort, they will then inquire whether the assembly is gathered there to the One Name. But here we have the way of faith : first the altar, next the tent. Then soon in joy will the love of God so fill the soul, as to constrain it to rear another altar. On the other hand, those who walk in the path of fleshly advantage, may obtain their desire, and get as a consequence the leanness sent in their souls. Whilst Abram adheres to the call of God, more and more of joy, and more and more discoveries of the Lord’s gracious will concerning him, does he find. On the other hand, going down to Egypt—type of this world—for a season, he has no altar there ; no voice of the Lord comes to him there. After he is once off the line, he gets more deeply involved in sin, one false step lead¬ ing to another. Hence he not only lies himself, but even acts the tempter to another, and she his wife. God, in His providence, rescues him. For if we will not be guided by His eye in love, we may have the bit and the bridle put upon us. At length Abram retraces his steps, returns to where his tent had been at the beginning , and to the place of the altar which he had made at the first. Then at once can he happily worship again. God cannot lower His standard nor abate His call. And it is a great mercy for us, that He cannot. We are called to the fellow¬ ship of His Son, and to walk in His light. In heeding His blessed will, we shall have His presence, and not other¬ wise. Bestored, Abram is stronger than ever. When¬ ever we overcome temptation, the trial proves a blessing to us, we perceive the snare from which w^e have been 48 Typical Foreshadowings. paved, and the grace that kept us. On the other hand, if we fall, we are unhappy till we are restored. Con¬ fession and judgment of the sin lift us above that from which we have been delivered, and lead us more sted- fastly than before, to depend on God, following Him in the path of faith. Circumstances are sure quickly to arise which, strengthened by God in trial, find us pre¬ pared to meet. So with Abram. He takes revenge on himself. Lot and he have to part. It had been better for Lot to have abandoned all his flocks than to have given up the com¬ pany of Abram. However, the elder makes the offer to Lot of the choice of the land, notwithstanding all was his own. But he leaves his concerns in the hands of the Lord. Lot, unable or unwilling to respond right¬ eously to Abram’s noble offer, by leaving the choice to bis uncle—induced by the lust of the eye, chooses the plain of Sodom, even although as the history here sig¬ nificantly informs us, “the men of Sodom were wicked, and sinners before the Lord exceedingly.” He with a bad conscience, by dwelling among them, can only have his righteous soul vexed daily by their wicked deeds. Their company he has chosen in preference to Abram’s, in consideration of increased earthly prosperity. And thus, outwardly at least, is commenced that declension of Lot, which, as the narrative proceeds, is seen to be¬ come increasingly grave and awful, until at chap. xix. 30—38, the Spirit draws the curtain over the close of Lot’s downward career. Likewise, in 2 Peter, whilst of some believers we read of their adding in their faith, manli¬ ness, knowledge, etc., and. of their obtaining an abun¬ dant entrance into the kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ; of others, we read that they are blind, shutting their eyes, forgetting that they have been The Lord’s IVay with Abraham. 49 purged, or profess they have, once from their old sins. Such, mingled among the Christianized heathen, learn their works, and lose much of the little portion of light which once they enjoyed. For them the world, at least in its religious side, which is by far the worst, has yet much power, not obeying the clear word of God, “ from such also turn away ” (2 Tim. iii. 5, Greek). It will be well for such who do not at last prove to have been quite hypocrites, by turning from the holy commandment, to wit, the commandment to holiness delivered unto them. For without holiness no man shall see the Lord. But the Lori is no uninterested spectator of Abram’s faith in Him. Hardly has Lot left him, ere the welcome voice of the Lord greets his ear. Surely this of itself was ample compensation to Abram for giving Lot the choice of the land. Thus did the Lord cause Abram to perceive that if he was now alone as to Lot, he was not alone as to Him. The language of the Lord at this time alludes, undoubtedly, to the choice of Lot. Lot had “ lifted up his eyes” (ver. 10). Hence the Lord bids Abram to C£ lift up his eyes” (ver. 14). Lot had chosen to pitch his tent eastward ; but the Lord assures Abram that the north and the south, the east and the west, were all his own. And He directs him, as the pos¬ sessor of the soil by the gift of God, to arise and walk throughout its length and. breadth. Surely as we ponder the account of this scene, we must be constrained to acknowledge that ’the manifestations of God s favour proceed still on the same principle as in Abram’s day ; that God delights to respond to faith in Himself, that those who trust iu Him shall enjoy the power of His word and promise, and shall have their faith increased. Compare John xiv. 21—23. How, likewise, Abram first hears of the less comparison of his seed to the dust of 4 50 Typical Foreshadowings. the earth. Presently, as he goes on with God, he will hear of his seed exceeding the stars of heaven in number (xv. 5). For Abram is the father of the two seeds, of the peoples of the two calls—the earthly and the heavenly. They that he of faith are the children of Abraham, and “ are blessed with him.” True, we get not only the best of what was promised to Abraham, but infinitely more besides, even union with the Son of God. Still, also, “ the blessing of Abraham has come on us Gentiles through Jesus Christ.” See Gal. iii. 7, 9, 14. And the new nation of Israel vrill be his true earthly seed. Then, in Gen. xxii., after the offering up of his son Isaac, the Lord conjoins these two promises of his seed being multiplied as the stars of heaven and as the sand upon the seashore. Thus God goes on in grace with His people. Thus does faith, acting in obedience, hear more and more of His blessed will, and receive more and more from Him. One of these pro¬ mises has been in the type and shadow already fulfilled (1 Kings iv. 20). The latter promise of the heavenly seed is being actually fulfilled now. And when the children of God are removed to their final home yonder, then will God remember His promises to Israel. Hence, in Chap. XIV., we have a scene representing millennial glory, and of the great, the true Melchisedek, coming with blessing to u Abram the Hebrew” (ver. 13), and so representing the remnant of Israel who shall be saved at the appearing of the Lord. But let us look at the chapter carefully, which may be profitably viewed, both in its prophetic and in its didactic, or rather expe¬ rimental aspect. Just a word on each of these two. Then, at your leisure, you can ponder its teaching more at length. As to the prophetic picture here, the king of Sodom ? The Lord’s Way with Abraham. 51 with his confederates, are overcome by Amraphel, king of Shinar, or Babylon ; Chedorlaomer, king of Elam— which term Elam is the Hebrew for Persia ; Arioch, king of Ellasar, i.e., Hellas, as in the Septuagiut, Greece; and Tidal, king of nations, who here evidently stands for the fourth kingdom of Dan. ii. and vii., namely, Rome. For the Roman empire will yet again be headed up under ten kings, with one imperial ruler over them all (Rev. xiii. and xvii.) These last will, as we are distinctly warned in Rev. xvii., sweep away quite from off the face of the earth the corrupt, the unclean Christianity that is left after the removal of the church to heaven.* But the Hebrew Abram proves too much even for such potentates. So, in the antitype, first, a remnant in weak¬ ness refuse to accept the worship of the beast, and to bow down before his image, the abomination of desolation that he will set up 3 and then subsequently, when the Lord appears, the Jews will be delivered from all their ene¬ mies, as prophetic Scriptures unitedly concur in declar¬ ing. On these points I have the less need to tarry, having fully gone into them in my published “ Lectures on the Revelation.’’ Then, after the slaughter of the kings, and of their armies, on the plain of Armageddon, the great priest-king, Melchisedek, will bless and strengthen Israel. He was priest of the most high God, which name of God has been already expounded in chap. x. So Christ brings down the blessing to Israel; for Israel is to be blessed on the earth. The same Lord Jesus is also our high Priest, but in this capacity His gracious work is to lift us up to Himself where He is. But since God is possessor of both “ heaven and earth,” as Melchise¬ dek pointedly reminds Abram of, so God has not only * gee niy Lecture on chap. xvii. of the Revelation. 52 Typical Foreshadowings . one blessing, though much the higher, for us, but also another on earth for Israel. Therefore must He appear, to bring down with Him that blessing from God. For where this high Priest is at any given period, there is then the place of God’s call, and of man’s blessing. In fact, strictly, the Lord Jesus is not acting in this cha¬ racter as Melchisedek at all at present (see Psalm cx.) ; rather now He is as the antitypical Aaron, within the holiest of all—this one day of grace and salvation. For a reign implies the employment of force, and of the sword, to subdue opposition; but in those supreme heavens, where the Lord Jesus at present is “hid” (Col. iii.), enemies cannot approach. There only His wondrous merits are the delight of God; there His precious blood and His all-prevailing intercession are alone heard. On the other hand, Israel and the world can only be blessed through judgment- This chapter has been strangely appealed to by some, in proof of the lawfulness of Christians becoming sol¬ diers, and of their engaging in war. Such forget the total change of dispensation since Abram’s call to in¬ herit the land. For this church-period has been inaugu¬ rated by One, who, when He had enemies, conquered by suffering them to kill Him. Besides which, if any plead this chapter as an excuse for their fighting, such, if Christians, should remember that they fight unfairly. These, killing their opponents, send them, if unsaved, to hell; but if the opponents kill themselves who aie Christians, these depart to be with Christ. FTow it is time that we look at this chapter from another point of view. It tells of three battles. The first is preliminary to the second, in which the man of faith, relying solely on God, goes forth to attack the confederated hosts, and to deliver his nephew Lot. For 53 The Lord’s l¥ay with Abraham. Lot’s sin had already found him out; he has lost all his goods, for the sake of which he parted company with Abram, to whom now he owes, if not his life, at least his liberty. Well would it have been for him to have at last heeded the painful lesson which this was designed to teach him when his nest was stirred up. For the Lord could only by His providence address him as one out of communion, and not like He did Abram, hold¬ ing converse with him as a friend. Bat so persistent is Lot in his sin, that he actually returns to Sodom for sixteen years, and then he is scarcely saved from shar¬ ing its destruction, partly through the intercession of Abram (see Gen. xix. 29). But, further, this second battle, important as it i3, is still a preliminary to the third one, and in Abram’s case the most important of all. How severe, to say the least, it would have been in the soul of Abram we may infer by the timely and signal interposition of Melchise- dek. He strengthened him after the former battle with bread and wine, and proceeds to remind him that his God is the possessor of heaven and earth. And, re¬ markably, of this title of God Abram makes prompt use in his reply to the king of Sodom, when he made him his dazzling, tempting offer of all the goods that he had brought back for his own acceptance. Thus we perceive that this confirmation of Abram’s faith in God was vouchsafed in the nick of time, just when it was re¬ quired ; for surely that strength is not supplied need¬ lessly. And then he refuses to touch aught of what was the king of Sodom’s. Only, with a fine sense of perfect righteousness, he disdains speaking on behalf of Aner, Eschol, and Mamre. For himself, his concern is the glory of God ; for others, he states what is their due who had helped him. ®!j£ Htnrifs Mtau hritlj JUrraljam. Section II. The training of the belieuer for the inherit¬ ance* Genesis xv.—xxi. /"''HAPTEKS XY. to XXI. These chapters might be v ‘“"' summarized thus :—Chap. xv. Justification by faith, and history of that nation which, stumbling at God’s stumbling-stone, is set aside for a while for the heavenly seed ; chap. xvi. Elesh active, and Hagar, or law, resorted to ; chap. xvii. Grace judging the flesh; chap, xviii. Communion; chap. xix. Judgment; chap, xx. Man to the last unconfiding ; yet, chap, xxi., the Lord faithful—the true Seed born, and the Millennium. Obviously, it will be impossible in our rapid survey to do more than touch on the salient points in this summary. In chap. xv. there are five scenes, together extending over an entire night and day. It would likewise seem as if only in the night-time did the Lord throughout this chapter accost Abram. This probably may be ac¬ counted for by the prophecies found here, all referring to Abram’s seed during the night of their history. In scene one, extending down the first six verses, the time may be about midnight. The word of the Lord comes to Abram in a vision, and, in reference to his self-denial in refusing the goods of the king of Sodom, says, “ 1 55 The Lord’s Way with Abraham. am thy shield, and thy exceeding great reward.” For God never lets His people lose in the long run for their trust in Him. If Abram refused the spoil of Sodom, he gained in increased joy in God. So it is ever. If one, for Christ’s sake, abandons what God calls him from, he not only has eternal life in the world to come, but a hundred-fold more in the enjoyment of God’s pre¬ sence than anything he has surrendered. But God con¬ tinues with the assurance that Abram’s seed, old as he is, shall be numerous as the stars of heaven. And that this latter part of the promise is widely different from that found in chap. xiii. 16, see the remarks already made on that Scripture. Compare Jer. xxxiii. 22, where, as further on in Gen. xxii., the two seeds, the heavenly and the earthly, are each distinctly specified. And well may the heavenly seed be glanced at here, seeing that the precious truth of justification follows in the next verse, and on which passage read the inspired comment in Bom. iv. 3, 17—24. Then, in scene two, occurring near the morning light, from verse 7 to verse 10, Abram hears somewhat as to the earthly seed which is to possess “ this land,” asking for a sign, not in unbelief, but in the boldness of faith; for communion with God increases faith, and renders it bold. God gives him his desire. He is instructed to take three animals, for the three kinds of offerings ; for Israel can only be blessed through Christ’s sacrifice. Each of the animals slain is to be three years old, signifying that his earthly seed should be a sacrifice for three centuries, but in the fourth should come safely out, as the birds. Next, in scene three, Abram seems to pass the day in standing by his sacrifice of animals cleft in twain. Thus, too, did Balak by his ; and thus, too, the Christian should by his identification with the Christ who died, is risen 56 Typical For e shadow higs. and glorified—the sacrifice is the plea of him who stands by it. The sole occupation of Abram during the day is to drive away the birds of prey. We, when we appear before God, should have our eye on Christ, and thus be filled with joy, delighting in Him, and in His finished work. But, alas, wandering thoughts, and anxious cares, and unbelief, will, unless they are watched against, ob¬ struct all this peace and joy in Christ. In the type to Abram, these fowls that come down on the sacrifices rent in twain, signify of course the Egyptians, who would fain have made Israel a prey for themselves. Accordingly, in the fourth place, when the sun de¬ clines, the Lord again speaks to Abram, first interpret¬ ing to him, inverses 13—1G, the sign that He had given to him ; and next, when the sun has set, that sign is confirmed by the vision of the smoking furnace; and then with the passing between the pieces of a burning Lamp, symbol of the Shechinah ; the lamp is Christ, who is salvation for Israel and for us (see in proof Ps. cxxxii. 17 ; Ezek. i. 13; and Isa. lxii. 1). This term “Lamp” is not unfrequently found in the book of Kings, and is there used to denote a son and successor to David (see 1 Kings xi. 3G, marg.; xv. 4; and 2 Kings viii. 19). The passing between the pieces of the sacri¬ fice is explained in Jer. xxxiv. 18, to represent the entrance into a covenant of the parties so passing. Wherefore the passing of the lamp here signifies the Lord pledging Himself in that striking way, to succour and to deliver Israel, bringing them forth from the furnace in triumph, and in plenty. And thus the issue of their bondage was seen to by Him from the beginning. And then, as the time for their deliverance drew nigh, He enlarges at once on the minuter details of that deliverance, pro¬ viding from the outset for their coming forth, not as 57 The Lord’s IVay with Abraham . beggars, but rather as princes, with silver and with gold in plenty (Ps. cv. 37). They were to “ask” (Exod. iii. 22), (Hebrew, not “ borrow ”) of the Egyptians. For these wages for their hard work were of long date, and had never been paid. But here God’s pledge of His succour is unconditional, as seen by the fact that the lamp alone and not Abram passed between the pieces. But the morning cometh, according as we see is sug¬ gested, in the fifth and concluding scene in this chapter (verse 18). And there all that God had promised Israel, that people shall yet possess. Never of old did their territorial possessions actually extend to the great river Euphrates, as is here promised should be the case, because the real and full inheritance of the land can only be obtained and enjoyed, when sovereign grace shall have all its own way with them. By a covenant of plaster, which the winds and storms could destroy, they have as yet possessed only a part (Deut. xxvii. 4). At the most a shadow of the truth passed for a moment before their eyes in Solomon’s time (1 Kings iv. 21). But God will yet remember every engagement which He has made, and fulfil to the letter every part of His word. Likewise will He act towards ourselves. Even now we who believe are under grace. And ere Israel obtains possession in full of the land promised to Abram we shall have been brought safe home to our inheri¬ tance reserved in heaven. The Earnest of that inheri¬ tance is ours to be enjoyed now. Still, however, we await Him who to us is the morning Star. Till then our path is a chequered one, being alternated on the one hand in the furnace of affliction, and on the other by the shining of the light from above upon our souls. Chapter XVI. On this chapter, the third and fourth 5 8 Typical Foreshadowings. chapters of Galatians should he carefully pondered. We find here an illustration of what we are painfully con¬ scious to be the case with ourselves, that unbelief can be present and at work even in a believing heart. In chap, xviii. we have further evidence of this. Abram and Sarai were each of them believers, yet neither at this time appears to have been in a condition of soul to wait patiently on God. The Holy Ghost often in the Word combines patience with faith. See, for instance, Kev. ii. 19 ; 1 Thess. i. 3 ; Titus ii. 2 ; Heb. vi. 12. Nothing tests faith like delay on the part of God ; for the flesh will struggle to make itself heard, and will resort to efforts that, at another time, the believer can see the unbelief displayed thereby. For that text is still true,