THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA THE COLLECTION OF NORTH CAROLINIANA C378 UK3 1853N UNIVERSITY OF N.C. AT CHAPEL HILL 00036721342 This book must- not be token from the Library building. I Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hil http://www.archive.org/details/addressdeliveredOOnich ADDRESS DELIVERED BEFORE THE €m\i %\itmi\ §nmiu:> . UNIVERSITY OF NORTH'CAROLINA, June 1> 1853, M HON. A. 0. P. NICHOLSON, OF TENNESSEE. RALEIGH; PRINTED BY W: W. HOLDEN, "STANDARD" OFFICE, 1853i 11 Dialectic Hall, June 2, 1853. Sir: " ' Having been appointed a Commitfee, in behalf of the Dialectic Society, (o tender you the thanks of that body, for the veiy able, instructive, and patriotic Address which you delivered yesterday before the two Literary Societies, and to request of you a copy of tlie same for publication, we most earnestly hope you will not deny us a gratification so pleasing and a treasure so inestimable. Permit us to express the very great pleasure we experienced during its de- livery, and to add our personal solicitations to those of the Society which we represent. Willi the highest regard, W. L. ALEXANDER, R. B. JOHNSTON, \ (hinmittee. W. LAFAYETTE SCOTT, Hon. A. 0. P. Nicholson'. Washixgton City, Avffust ], 1853. • Gentlemen : Yours of June 2d has been received, requesting a copy of my Address at the late Commencement at Chapel Hill, and insisting on my compliance. It is dif- ficult for me to overcome my aversion to the publication of a production which was prepared under circumstances which rendered it impossible for me to do justice to the occasion for which it was designed. But lest my refusal might be misconstrued, I forward a copy, and submit the disposition of it to your discretion. • For the kind reception which I met from the Dialectic Society, and for the compliment implied in their resolution, I ask you to convey to the members, whilst you accept for yourselves, my unfeigned thanks. Very respectfully, A. 0. P. NICHOLSON. Messrs. Alexander, ) JoHNSTO.v, >• Committee. Scott, ) y ADDRESS Gentlemen of the Philanthroinc and Dialectic Societies: I propose to redeem my promise to address you on this oc- casion, by submitting, for your consideration, a few practical remarks upon the influence and responsibihties of the Law- yer. It has occurred to me that this subject might be ap- propriately and perhaps profitably discussed before an audi- ence of whom a liberal portion is doubtless looking forward to the legal profession as the field of their future labors, and rewards and honors. When I speak of the lawyer, I mean an educated man — one whose intellectual faculties have been developed, disci- plined and enlarged, preparatory to the labors of the profes- sional student, and who has successfully encountered the ob- stacles which lie in his path as a student, and so far progress- ed in the science of the law as to entitle him to a place in the Temple of Justice, as one of her authorised advocates. It is the influence exerted by such a man on society, and the consequent responsibilities which attach to his position, on which I desire to enlist your indulgent attention during the next hour. My subject leads me, at the threshold, into the considera- tion of the power of mind over mind. I shall not be guilty of the presumption and folly, however, of undertaking to analyze the inherent properties and constituent elements of mind, or to elucidate the mysterious process by which its power is made effective. That '' mind is power " is a tru- ism ; but a limit was given to this power by Him from \vhom it emanated, and to attempt to pass this limit would be worse than folly. When God closed the wonderful work of Crea- tion, and " saw every thing that ho had made, and, behold, it was very good," lie prescribed the laws by which the vast machinery of the universe was to be governed. To-enable man to discover the existence of these laws, to comprehend their modes of operation, and to build upon them systems of science, he was made " a living soul " — and one of the no- blest uses to which he can dedicate the capacity thus given him, is to the discovery and development of the laws of na- ture, their combination into distinct systems of science, there- by contributing to the enlargement of the range of philoso- phy, and to the extension of human knowledge and happi- ness. Philosophy acknowledges no indebtedness to the crea- tive powers of those profound intellects which have, from time to time, penetrated into the deep mysteries of nature, brought to light the eternal laws of her government, and upon their discoveries based their claims to immortal honors. The work of creation was finished in the beginning, and was com- mitted to man for his investigation and comprehension. This task has- given full employment to the most capacious minds that have illumined the progress of scientific research, and the task is yet unfinished. In the material world '■'■ the march of mind " has been constantly onward in the enlargement of the boundaries of natural philosophy ; but comparatively few triumphs have been achieved in the development of the laws of our moral government. It is not to be doubted that the laws of mind and of morals were originally prescribed with as much certainty and distinctness as were those of matter.. But whether they were designed from the beginning to be susceptible of only imperfect development, in consequence of the disturbing influences of the affections and passions, or whether the obscurity which hangs over our moral nature is one of the results of man's first disobedience, I shrill not un- dertake to determine. Our discoveries have gone far enough to enable us to know that there are laws regulating the inter- course of soul with soul ; and though we may not be aUe to build upon our discoveries in this etheriai field, systeins of mental and moral philosophy, distinguished by the demon- strative certainU^ of the physical sciences^ yet we may turn the little -that we do know to profitable account. We know as ceitainly that mind attracts mind and that virtue attracts virtue, as we do that matter attracts matter ; and it is by no means improbable that these diiTerent species of attractions are governed bylaws strictly analogous. As the natural phi- losopher will not undertake to say what the gravity of mat- ter is, but only what it does, much less would I be expected to say what the gravity of mind or of morals is. I am con- tent to know that it exists, and upon this knowledge, to point out the power and influence exerted by the educated man over society. It \n\\ be observed, that when I speak of an educated man, I speak of one whose moral as well as his mental faculties have been properly cultivated. Superior mind is inherently pow- erful and influential ; but when unregulated and unrestrain- ed by a pure moral standard, it is a power to be dreaded. If the truth of this remark needed confirmation, it may be signallly illustrated by reference to the causes recorded in his- tory, as having contributed to the French Revolution. This great event, out of which grew wars that embroiled all the nations of Europe, is attributed, in no small degree, to the influence exerted upon the popular mind and public morals of P^rance, by the powerful intellectual eflferts of her distin- guished writers, amongst whom stand conspicuously the names' of Helvetius, Voltaire, Rousseau and Diderot. The philosophy of Helvetius was a refined system of materialism, and was little else than a revival of pagan epicurianism. But it- was congenial with the taste of the times, and was therefore adopted with avidity. Voltaire attempted no new system, but sought rather to render all systems absurd by his powers of sarcasm and ridicule. He is distinguished as the chief apostle of French infidelity, and was idolized as the oracle of his age. " He put the ball of atheism in motion, and others followed in a bolder track ; pushed out, not his principles, for he had none, but his spirit into the extreme of 8 mockery and negation. ' ' Rousseau wrote elegantly in praise of unsophisticated nature, and professed to love the simple and the natural, whilst he really seduced the weak and sus-