m s# W&t JLibxavv of the ©totbergttp of j?ortf) Carolina <2Tiie Cameron Collection 3n iUlcmorp of pennefjan Cameron September 9, 1854 -lune 1, 1925 trustee of tfjc Unibe rsitp of J^orth Carolina 189M925 HI $111 IIP ill m ffi&m «*»" • ■■'.. ssHt -:.•:■■ mfm W 0m mm m 9 - . " '■ - pn ■■ ■•■'"• :,: ■'■■■' - ; '' •■"■■'■' ■■ :.-v- Be Cameron Doa No. 71.] [Ses. 1853-'9. Ordered to oe Printed. Ilolden & Wilson, Printers to the State. REPORT OF THE JOINT 'SELECT COMMITTEE ON • THE NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD. The joint select committee on the general management and financial condition and prospects of the North Carolina Rail- road Company direct the undersigned to submit the following report as the result of their investigations. From the nature of the inquiry as well as from the terms of the resolution under which your committee was appointed,, they deemed it inexpedient to attempt to examine into details,, except so far as to form some idea of the general management,, since it was obvious that this would require more time than they could bestow on on it, even if they had devoted to it the' whole of the session, to the neglect of all their other duties. Yery soon after the announcement of the committee, they received the annexed letter from Gov. Bragg, (marked No. 1), inclosing the annexed letter, dated December 8th, from Chas.. F. Fisher, Esq., President of the Road, (marked No. 2.) In consideration of these communications they resolved to ©ive Mr. Fisher time to make read} 7 - the report to which he refer- red. Hearing nothing further from him., they addressed to- him a letter, dated December IS, 1858, requesting him to at- tend them on the 4th of January, with his. treasurer, book- keeper, books, &c, a copy of which, (No. 3) with Mr. Fisher's reply, dated December 22d, 1858, is hereto annexed. At the time appointed, Mr. Fisher, Cyrus P. Mendenhall, ^ the treasurer, andR. W. Mills, the book-keeper, attended, with u*. the books and papers. The committee took into their possession 2 Document No. 71. [Session the journal of the directors and sundry papers which they deemed pertinent to their inquiry, — sat from evening to eve- ning, and left with the book-keeper and treasurer sundry in- quiries to be answered at subsequent sittings ; and, in the lat- ter part of that week, consented that the treasurer and book- keeper might go home, to be back again on the Monday fol- lowing. Mr. Fisher, on the 4th January, informed us that his presence on the road, at the beginning of the year, when the new hands had to be distributed, was highly necessary, and the committee consented that he attend to the duties on the road, he agreeing to return whenever he should be notified that his presence was desired by us. On Monday, the 8th of January, Mr. Mendenhall returned, but Mr. Mills, who had taken away, without consulting us,, certain books containing matters which we were investiga- ting, did not return, and he remained away all that week, with the books he had taken with him. On Saturday, your chairman saw Mr. Fisher and informed him that their pro- ceedings were arrested for want of the books which the book- keeper had taken away. Under the orders of the committee, on Saturday night, the chairman addressed to Mr. Fisher a letter, of which the following is a copy : Raleigh, January 15th, 1859. Me. Chas. Fisher — Dear Sir : — The committee investigating the affairs of the N. C. R. R, Company, instruct me to say to you that they have been arrested in the discharge of their duty all the week, by the non-attendance of your book-keeper, who should have been here all the week with his books, according to the orders of this committee. The committee require that your book-keeper, with hi3 books, attend this committee without delay ; and also that the person having charge of your shop books, attend with his books, by 4 o'clock P. M., on Tuesday next. The committee also instruct me to ask for your personal at- tendance before them by 4 P. M., on Wednesday next. Tours respectfully, J.WORTH, Ch'mn. 1858-'9.] Document No. 71. 3 On Sunday morning, Mr. "West, the station agent at Ra- leigh, called on the chairman, with a note from Mr. Mills, the book-keeper, stating that Mr. Fisher desired him to get the journal of the Directors from the office, or of any mem- ber of the committee who might have it, and send it to Sal- isbury — whereupon the following postscript was added : " Sunday, January 16th, 1859. Mr. "West has presented to me your secretary's note, asking for the book containing the proceedings of the directory. I decline to send it. J. WORTH." On Monday the book-keeper attended, and explained that he had been engaged in supplying Mr. Fisher with materials for a report he was having printed in Salisbury. On Tuesday the master machinist attended with his books, and answered promptly all questions propounded to him. Mr. Fisher did not attend on Wednesday, and has made no reply to the foregoing letter, which has been read to the committee and unanimously approved by them. Your committee have not exercised the power conferred on them to send for persons and papers and examine them on oath, because thej> found that the short time remaining, would not permit a thorough investigation, and that many matters which they deem important could be fully examined without resorting to this course. The following are the results of the imperfect inquiry they have been able to make under the foregoing circumstances. On the 19th December, 1854, we find on the journal of the Directors, the following resolution. Present : John M. Morehead, R. M. Saunders, F. Fries, John Berry, Robert Strange, W. T. Dortch, George Stephenson, Caleb Phifer, Samuel Hargrave, ( 'harles F. Fisher. K G. Rand, " On motion, ordered that the settlement of the contract with John 0. McRae & Co., bo referred to R. M. Saunders, 4r Document ISTo. 71. [Session K. Q. Rand, W. T. Dortch and Charles F. Fisher, with full power to settle and adjust the same." " At the request of John 0. McRae & Co., the board agree to finish the remainder of the first division, for which said McRae tfeCo., are to account on the settlement above, accord- ing to the estimate of the engineer." At the same time the board order the sum of $4000, to be paid to said McRae & Co., as soon as the treasury would ad- mit, " in advance of the final settlement." Your committee regarded this resolution, by which was transferred to a committee of the Directory, a duty which could be intelligently performed by the engineer only, as pre- senting a question worthy of investigation. They called for the contract between the said McRae & Co., and the report of the committee appointed to settle with them. Mr. Fisher stated that soon after the cars on this division, built by John C. McRae & Co., began to run, in consequence of a culvert defectively built, a freshet produced in the road a breach, in- to which a freight train fell, destroying two lives, and doing much damage to the engine and cars; and that it was found necessary to reconstruct many of them. In his report of July 7th, 1857, he sets. down, among work done by him, ten cul- verts on eastern division, reconstructed. Whether others were afterwards reconstructed, your committee are not in- formed. We were aware of the high reputation of Col. Gwynn. as an engineer, and that every administration of the road had emphatically expressed their high appreciation of the services he had rendered the company, and as we shall have frequent occasion to refer to his professional opinions we would here call attention to the resolution of the board, passed on the 10th January, 1856, at the time he tendered his resigna- tion, as chief engineer, declaring that "the thanks of the board being due, are hereby cordially tendered to him for his able, efficient and faithful services as chief engineer of the North-Carolina Railroad Company, and that ho be tendered for himself and family, a free passage for life over the road." We resolved to ascertain whether this defective work was 185S-'9.] Document No. 71. 5 approved by the engineer, who was the proper officer to judge of its sufficiency, or any subordinate of his, having the work under his immediate charge. We addressed a letter to Col. Gwynn and also to Mr. James Miller, chief assistant engineer, asking them to inform us whether they or either of them made any report as to the sufficiency or insufficiency of the work — and if they did not report on it, why they did not — and whether the committee appointed to make this settle- ment, consulted them as to the character of the work ? The answer of Mr. Miller, No. 4, and the answer of Col. Gwynn No. 5, are hereto annexed, from which it will be seen that neither of them v:as consulted hy the committee — and Col. Gwynn says he disapproved of much of the work done by Jno. C. McRae & Co. on the North Carolina Railroad. The masonry of the bridge over the Neuse and the culverts were badly built. We call special attention to these letters. We endeavored to ascertain the amount of damage sustain- ed by the company by the falling in of the freight train — and the cost of re-constructing the defective culverts, but could get no information approximating certainty. It cer- tainly amounted to a large sum. These contractors undertook to build the first division of the road from its eastern terminus, the point of connection with the Wilmington and Raleigh road, to the eastern ter- minus of the 2nd division, about six miles west of Raleigh, furnishing the iron rails, and every other species of material and doing all the work. They were to provide the road " with all and every fixture, and work that may, in the judg- ment of the chief engineer, be required for the speedy and safe transit of locomotives with their trains : all materials and all work to be subject to the inspection of the chief engineer or some one appointed by him." The contract sets out at great length and with great minuteness, the weight and quali- ty of the rails, brick and other material to be used and the manner in which every species of work is to be done. They stipulate to complete the work by the 1st January, 1854 — and that " the time herein stated shall be considered as of the es- sence of the agreement." 6 Document No. 71. [Session The rail road company stipulate to pay the contractors $628,952, from which was to be deducted the final estimates of certain contracts, theretofore taken for a part of the work on the first division, and all cost of engineering and superin- tendence on this division, and one fourth of the salary of the chief engineer, and one fourth of the expenses of the general administration of the company : they were to take off the hands of certain subscribers to the stock of the company 885 shares of stock and the balance was to be paid in money, the rail road company reserving one-fifth of the bi-monthly esti- mates until the said McRae & Co., should complete their un- dertaking. We find in the contract the following clause : " the chief engineer shall in all cases, decide every question which can or may arise relative to the execution of this con- tract on the part of said contractor, and his decision shall be final and conclusive." We find that on the 1st April 1852, the board of directors " resolved that in all future estimates, made on the work of John C. McRae & Co., on the first division of the North Carolina Rail Road only 10 per cent, be reserved instead of 20 per cent. " On the 9th December 1852, the subscription of $2,000,000 to the stock of the company was made by Governor Reid in behalf of the State. On the 2nd of April 1 853, time is given to McRae & Co., till 1st April 1854, to finish their contract. On the 15th July, 1853, the State directors take their seat in the board of directors, many ballotings are had for president, which resulted in the election of John M. Morehead. On the 16th July 1853, the directors " resolved that the company authorize Col. Walter Gwynn to make a contract with John C. McRae & Co., to furnish said John C. McRae & Co., with a locomotive and freight train upon such terms and conditions as he may deem expedient for the speedy com- pletion of the first division of the North-Carolina Railroad." On the 3d August 1853, the directors order the president to pay said contractors $10,000 " as an advance payment on their estimates to be made after the first day of September. " IS 58- 9.] Document No. 71. 7 On the 31st August 1S53, on the representations of the chief engineer that the force employed was inadeq o finish this contract by the first April following, the board request these contractors to increase their force to a sufficient; extent to insure the completion of their work by the first April following. On the 13th April 1S51, the board ordered an advance pay- ment of $8000 to be made to the said John C. McRae & Co. On the 15th of July, 1854, the board of directors ordered "that John C. McRae & Co., be notified to have the Road from Goldsboro' to ^fallings' station, and the arm to Wa; 3- boro', finished and ready for the use of the compau}', accord- ing to the orders heretofore issued to said contractors by the chief engineer, on the 1st day of September next; and in case they should fail to comply with the requirements of this no- tice, the chief engineer is instructed to employ the uecessary force to execute said work and charge the same to the said John C. McRae & Co., according to the terms of the con it with the said firm." In pursuance of this order, the engineer employed hands and expendad on this contract, as per account on tile, $6, 553. 22* In consequence of the delay of these contractors in comple- 1 ting their undertaking, Governor Morehead, the then presi- dent of the road, entered into a contract with them, by which it was agreed that the rail road company was to furnish the material and lay the track from the Raleigh station to the western end of the first division, at $0,4-00 per mile, the ori- ginal estimate of the engineers, to he retained out of the j? rice agreed to he paid to McRae & Co,, they having liberty, when they finished the road to Raleigh, to turn over to the railroad company, all the rails, chairs, spikes and sills, they might have remaining on hand, to be allowed the prices originally esti- mated by the engineer for the same ; and for any deficiency of such materials, thus turned over, to complete that end of the road, the said McRae & Co. were to pay the actual cost, which was, $4105.71. The following is a copy of the report of the committee of directors appointed to settle with the said John C. McRae & Co # 8 Document No. 71. [Session " In examining the general account, as exhibited to us, be- tween John C. McRae & Co., and the North Carolina Kail Road Company, we agree to allow deducting, as credit, on the following items ; to-wit : the item for completing the road below Stallings', one half, $3,276.61. The item as to excess of iron, &c.j he is to be credited with $1353.50. In the item as to turnout at Raleigh station, he is to be credited with $1835.- 95. The account will be reformed accordingly. R. M. SAUNDERS, N. G. RAND, CHAS. F. FISHER, WM. T.DORTCH." By this settlement you will see that Jno. C. McRae & Co. are allowed, over and besides what they would have leen en- titled to receive, if they had completed their worlt, accordiny to contract, as follows : Half the amount expended by the Company for work done below Stallings', $3,276 61 Item as to excess'of iron, 1 ,353 50 Item as to turnout at Raleigh, 1 ,835 95 $6,466 06 And the said committee further remitted to the said McRae & Co. interest on stock to be re- funded, 177 00 Total amount of extra allowance, $6,643 06 When it is considered that great indulgence had uniformly been extended to these contractors from the beginning, by a reduction of the 20 per cent, to have been retained as a secu- rity for the performance of their contract, to 10 per cent.; by the endorsement of the Rail Road Company to enable them to buy iron ; by repeated extensions of time to complete their contract ; by large payments in advance of estimates ; when it is seen that the engineer, who, by the terms of the contract, 1858-'9.] Document No. 71. 9 was to have been the judge of the sufficiency of the work and who was alone competent to discharge this duty with discre- tion, disapproved this work, and that his disapproval was known to the Directors : when, under these circumstances, the Directors appoint four of their body a committee with powers to approve, and receive, and order payment fur the work : — when it is seen that this settling committee actuall}' allow these contractors $6643 06 more than they would have been entitled to receive, if they had executed their contract faithfully : when it is considered that this work proved to be defective as the Engineer had said it was, whereby the Com- pany had soon afterwards to re-constrnct a considerable portion of it, and whereby much damage was done and two lives lost; when it is considered that these contractors could cast, in a meeting of stockholders SS5 votes ; and that no other contrac- tor on the Road had his contract received and paid for until it received the approval of the Engineer, your committee conceive that the facts are furnished from which you can draw the proper conclusion. Your committee attempted to inquire into the question, under which administration of the road was purchased the excessive quantity of wood referred to in the 6th page of Mr, Fisher's report of July, 1S57. In this report lie sets forth that there is then on hand wood, of the value of $47,363 01, which he represents as enough for a longer term than three or four j'ears. He says, in this report, " this large surplusage of wood is on the eastern end, and was delivered under con- tracts made before my term of office, under the direction of the engineers in charge, which contracts could not be rescind- ed or delayed. It has been a very troublesome item of cost." At the date of this report Mr. Fisher had been in office two years as president. If, after using off this wood for two years, there was still on hand a surplus more than sufficient for three or four years, it was obvious that the former administration, under which these contracts were said to have been made, was highly reprehensible ; not only on account of the large amount of money involved, but because the wo »d must be greatly damaged by decay, before it could be used and was liable to be destroyed by fire. 10 Document No. 71. [Session We called for the written contracts under which this wood was furnished with the view of seeing who had committed this error. We annex to this report a tabular statement, made from these contracts, showing the date of each contract — the quan- tity of wood contracted for — -and the time when deliverable, marked No. 6. From these it will be seen that Gov. Morehead contracted on the 20th February, 1853, for 1500 cords of wood, deliver- able in six, nine and twelve months ; one-third at each period, and 1000 cords, all deliverable on the western end of the road, in all 2500 cords ; and contracts were made for wood, deliverable on the eastern end of the road, after Mr. Fisher's term of office commenced, (to-wit, July 13th, 1855,) to the amount of 41012^ cords, at a cost of $51,265. All these contracts were made, as will be seen by reference to said table, in November and December, 1856, and in January, February and March, 1857, and 3600 cords of it were deliv- erable in the months of January and February, 1857. The contracts for the western end of the road, excepting the two contracts made by Gov. Morehead, are not on file in the office of the treasurer and book-keeper, as they informed us. A member of the committee called our attention to alledg- ed mismanagement in acquiring the right of way over a por- tion of certain lots in the town of Raleigh, owned by Wm. N. Andrews. We called on Mr. Mendenhall for information, who stated that Gov. Morehead had taken a deed from An- drews for the right of way, and found it referred to in his in- dex, by its number, but the deed was not there. His recol- lection of it is, that Mr. Fisher had it in his possession the last time he saw it. We examined the Register's office. No such deed was registered. We found Andrews' receipt given to Gov. Morehead, dated May 15th, 1852, for $275 for right of way. It does not describe the lot, nor quantity granted, which was probably described accurately in the deed. We cited Andrews to appear before us and bring his deeds. He appeared, and stated that he had signed some papers to Gov. Morehead, granting the right of way as to lot No. 45, in the 1858-9.] Document No. 71. 11 plat of the city. He produced a deed from Wm. II . Jones, dated Feb. 22d, 1853, conveying to him lot No. 24, contain- ing one acre — consideration, $250. The deed also recites that for this consideration, Jones grants to him his (Jones's) right to damages, if he had any rights, from the North-Carolina railroad for right of way. Andrews stated that Eldridge Smith, Wm. II. Tucker and Ed. Yarborough, Jr., assessed the damages as to this lot ; that Mr. Fisher had paid him $460 as well as he could recollect. He thought there was still due him about $140. He said he had executed no deed for the right of way over this lot, and did not intend to execute one until the balance due him was paid. The treasurer showed us two warrants from Mr. Fisher, un- der which he had paid Andrews for right of way, $760. One of these warrants for $200, is dated November 22d, 1855; the other, for $560, is dated December 19th, 1855, which re- cites that it is in part. We found no reference, or award, or deed. We find on the journal of the directors, July 8th, 1852, the following : " Gen. Benjamin Trolinger having submitted a proposition to the board relative to some alteration and improvement of road and bridge at Haw river, the following was passed after some discussion : " JResolved, That Benjamin Trolinger be allowed to execute the work at the Haw river bridge, and the sections adjoining it on each side, in such manner that the level of the bridge shall be two and nine-tenths feet higher than it is now design- ed to be, extending each way from the bridge, on the west side 400 feet, and on the east side 700 feet— thence the grade of the railroad to ascend eastward parallel with the present grade and two feet and nine-tenths below it, until it reaches the summit level between Haw river and Back creek. The additional work required in making this to be executed with- out charge to the North Carolina Railroad Company." On the 10th of April, 1857, we find the following entries on the journal of the directors: " Ordered, that the president make a settlement with Gen. 12 Document No. 71. [Session Trollinger on the terms and conditions proposed by him at this date, which it is understood is a final one of all claims on his part." The following is a copy of the proposition referred to in the foregoing resolution. " To the President & Dieectoes of the N. C. It. E. — " Gentlemen : — In order to get a level at this place, I sunk the grade for about one mile at the cost of about (2^ feet lower) $1,000 and raised the bridge at a cost, by engineer's estimate, of . 684 and incurred the expense of conveying the water to this place, at a cost of 628 and built a water station and furnished the material, at a cost of about 400 $2,712 All of which you have enjoyed the free use. " I now propose to surrender to you the water and the other work for $2000. " All of which is respectfully submitted, " BENJ. TROLDTGER. " Haw River, April 10th, 1857." Under this proceeding the sum of $2000 was paid to Gen. Trolinger, and your committee learn that the water and water station are of little or no value to the company, being only two miles from Graham station and four miles from the shops- Your committee deemed it expedient and within the range of their inquiry, to investigate, as far as possible, the expe- diency of running the express train on this road. We were led to this investigation by the following remarks of Col. Gwynn in his farewell address, when leaving the road ; opin- ions touching matters pertaining to his profession, being the most reliable land-marks within our reach. I He says in his said report to the directors of the 10th of 1858-9.] Document No. 71. I 3 January, 1S56, tendering his resignation as chief engineer — l * 1 vroxald. .earnestly recommend, as the result of my observa- tion for a long period, that the company adopt a low rate ot speed for their passenger and freight trains. If there is any one proposition in railway economy, and there are, I assure the board, but few clearly, fully and practically demonstrated, it is the economy of low speeds ; though the precise difference between the cost of transportation due to different degrees of speed has not yet been ascertained, it is usually estimated that the wear and tear of the track and machinery is equal to the squares of the speeds at which the trains are run. The de- preciation then, at 20 miles per hour, would be four times greater than at 10 miles per hour, that is the wear and tear would he as 4 tol. The speed upon every road should be adapted to the amount of business. To the neglect of this rule, and the establishment of uniform rates of speed upon most of the railroads of the country, may be ascribed the small net earnings of many of them."' He then recommends a speed of 1(3 miles an hour for pas- senger trains. We have attempted to see whether there has been any in- crease of receipts on account of passengers, since this express train, exclusively used for the transportation of passengers, was put on the road — which would compensate the damage done by the extraordinary speed and expenses of outfit and running it. Mr. Fisher says in his report, extraordinary of the 20th January, 1859, that this train ran at the rates of 26 miles an hour, from the 7th April last, to the 6th January, without once missing a connection. This express train began to run (see Mr. Fisher's report of July, 1857,) on the 13th March, 1857, and witli the view of comparing the increase for passengers, before and after this train was put on the road, as well as to show the gradual In- crease of travel, we annex the income from passengers, for six corresponding months in 18561 If ore the express was put on the road — and for 1357 and 1S58, afterwards : 14: Document No. 71. [Session 1856. 1857. 1S58. July, $11,216 18 $14,478 22 $13,807 70 August, 11,112 13 13,433 95 13,553 48 September, 12,408 28 15,750 59 14,637 20 October, 11,320 05 16,085 15 15,710 17 November, 10,940 37 10,337 70 12,704 73 December, 13,057 97 12,716 93 15,241 08 $70,054 98 $82,802 54 $85,454 36 For the same six months of each year the amount received for freights is as follows : 1856. 1857. 1858. $75,655 20 $90,565 25 103,919 67 The amount received for freights is given, in this connec- tion, only to show that there is a gradual increase of the busi- ness of the road, which might have been expected from pas- sengers as well as freight. As to the outfit for the express train, we learn from Mr. Roberts, master machinist, that seven engines are employed in the express train service — and four in carrying the mails — and that these seven engines cost on the road $63,700 00 2 new coaches, - 5,000 00 3 baggage cars, - 4,500 00 Total outfit for express train, - - $73,200 00 Mr. Fisher in his report of July 1857, says "the additional cost of this second train has been $1041 per month, actual ex- pense. " Mr. Roberts's estimate of the monthly expense is as follows : 7 Engineer* at $85 00 per month, $595 CO 4 Conductors " 50 00 " 200 00 14 Firemen " 12 50 " 175 00 14 Breakmen " 22 00 " 308 00 185S-9.] Document No. 71. 15 Expenses of 7 engines for a year $108.50, per month, $904 00 Expense per month, $2,182 00 The income of both lines, mail and express, for the 6 months in 1857, beginning with July, more than three months after this second train started, is $82,802.54 Income of mail train for the corresponding 6 months in 1856, is 70,054.98 Gain, $12,747.56 Deduct expense of running express train as per Roberts's estimate per month $21 82 + 6, $13,092.00 Interest on outfit for 6 months at 8 per cent, per annum, $2,888 15,980.00 Net loss for six months, 3,232.44 Saying nothing about the wear andtear of road and machinery. For the same 6 months of the year 1S58, there was an in- crease over the corresponding months of 1857 of $2651.82, but much more than this increase took place as to freights, and might have been expected as to passengers, without the ex- press ; and it is observable that there was an actual fall- ing off as to passengers in July, August, September and Octo- ber, 1858. The small increase in the months of November and December, is probably attributable to the increase of way travel, during the sitting of the General Assembly. We observe that R. P. Dick, at a meeting of the directors, held on the 13th November 1857, moved that the express train be discontinued; motion did not prevail, three voting in the affirmative, 5 in the negative. We submit these facts, in relation to the express train, with- out comment. As to the loan of $350,000, at 8 per cent, interest. We find that the stockholders, at their general meeting on the 11th July 1856, authorized the president and directors to issue the coupon bonds of the company for the sum of $350,000, with 1G Document So. 71. [Session interest payable semi-annually, payable in ten years, at an in- terest of 6 per cent, for the purpose of meeting the present liabilities of the company and the purchase of the necessary motive power and cars. On the Mill November, 1850, the directors appointed a committee to " make a report of the condition of the road and its finances to the Legislature, in order to securing some ac- tion in reference to the bonds and making them available ;" alluding to the coupon bonds of the company aforesaid. Upon the memorial of this committee, an act was passed in 1856-'57, authorizing the directors to issue the $350,000 of coupon bonds, declaring them exempt from taxation for ten years, and authorizing the board of directors, at their discre- tion, to fix a rate of interest, not exceeding S per cent., and requiring them to assign and set apart a sufficient amount each year, out of the yearly income of the road, to pay off the in- terest on the bonds regularly, and to constitute a sinking fund sufficient to discharge the principal amount when due, "and this amount, so set apart as a sinking fund, shall be shown in. the annual report of the board." The directors, vnthout call- ing another meeting of the stockholders, fixed the rate of inter- est at 8 per cent, and sold the bonds at a premium of $137.5,0. On the 9th of July 1S57, the directors ordered "that the sum of $25,0000 be set apart out of the annual receipts and income of the road, as a fund to be invested and pledged for the payment of the principal of said bonds,'" at maturity. On the motion of Judge Ruffin, proxy for the State, * like resolution was passed by the stockholders at their annual meeting in July 185S. On the 8th December, 1858, the date of Mr. Fisher's letter to Governor Bmgg, a meeting of the directors was held, and another order made to set apart $25,000, in State bonds, de- signating the number of each bond, with the interest payable in April and October, as the first instalment of the sinking- fund ; and we find that they were handed to the Treasurer for registration on the 1.6th December, 1858, nearly two years having elapsed since the passage of the act requiring this amount to be set apart " each year. " IS58-9.] Document No. 71. 17 As to the expediency of extensive shops of construction and repair, your committee concur with every administration of the road, that they are indispensably necessary ; and as to the question where they should have been located, the opinion of the engineer was entitled to great consideration, and we have examined his report on this subject of August, 1853, as well as numerous letters addressed to him by many distinguished engineers, in reply to a circular letter written to them by him, asking their views on the subject. Nearly all of them concur in recommending the location of the principal shops near the center. We do not find that Col. Gwynn or any oth- er engineer recommended that the town, which must neces- sarily grow up around the shops, for the residence of the offi- cers aud operatives, and other houses needed in a town, should be built by the rail road company. "We have not been able to conceive, or learn from others, any reason to sustain this policy. What each or either of the 57 buildings at the shops cost, the treasurer and book-keeper informed us that they had not the means of ascertaining. The rate of rent is fixed, by the Directors at 8 per cent on cost — but though many of these buildings have been finished and occupied for several years, nothing could be found in the office showing the cost of any of them. Some of them have paid rent, but how the amount to be paid was ascertained, these officers cannot tell. The bills of the carpenters for work, the company finding all the lumber, are hereto annexed, embracing some brick. The four bills of Dudley & Ashley, No. 7, amount to $28,917 38. We call attention to them for several purposes : — First, the treasurer and book-keeper say that the written contracts un- der which this work was done, if any exist, are not on file with them. Secondly. Most of them are without date, and one of them contains items for work done by the day, in the year 1856, amounting to more than $6,000. Thirdly. The credits for all these bills are entered on the books, 21st December, 1858, by order of the President, who 2 18 Document No. 71. [Session* appears to have passed on them, without any estimate by any disinterested party competent to make it. As to the house of master of machinery, the Directors or- dered on the 3d of May, 1856, that it be built at a cost not exceeding $8,000. It is seen that the brick work and carpen- ter bill, by contract, amount to $2,902 75, to which is to be added the cost of lumber, shingles, painting, and other mate- rial. The master machinist informed us he had lived in this house two years — that he did not know the cost, and had paid no rent. On the 10th of April, 1857, the Directors " .Resolved, That it is advisable to build a hotel boarding house not to exceed $8,000 in cost. Ordered further, that a committee of three consisting of Messrs. Fries, Mebane and Shaver be associated with the President, to cany out the res^ olution tor erection of hotel boarding house." By reference to exhibits, No. 7, you will see that Dudley & Ashley's bill for the carpenter work only, not including any lumber, is $6,711 08. It is a brick building. What was the cost of brick, masomy, lumber, painting, &c, we could not ascertain ; but we infer from the cost of carpenter work, that the total cost cannot be short of $15,000 or $20,000. We ad- dressed a letter to Mr. Fries, one of the committee associated with the President, to explain why a building was erected, costing so largely above the amount limited by the Directors. See his answer annexed, No. 8. The president, in his report to the directors, July, 1S57, says "you have provided that the cost of every building at this place must pay a good dividend by a fair rent to the company. Only the shop buildings are an exception, and these ought to pay in profitable return, indirectly, most of alb" By order of the directors the houses are to be rented at 8 per cent, on cost. Your committee do not deem it judicious policy to borrow money at 8 per cent, and invest it in houses to be rented at 8 per cent. What the several houses at the shops cost your committee believe no one can tell In Mr. Fisher's report, extraordina- 1858-'9.] Document No. 71. 19 ry, to the governor, dated January 20th, 1859, (a report nof authorized by the directors, so far as their journal shows, and not provided for in the charter or by-laws of the company,) which lias so much delayed our inquiries, the cost of the shops is set down at $124,375 98 Buildings at 65,560 98 $189,930 96 In Mr. Fishers report of Jul}*, 1S58, the cost of the shops for 1855, 1856, 1857, and to July, 1858, is $124,374 9S $65,561 98 Assuming each of these reports to be accurate, there has been expended on the shops, since July 1st, 1858, $65,561 98. In relation to the abstract, appended to the report of 1858, the president remarks, "appended to this report will be found various abstract statements which explain themselves. That showing the disbursement account of the past three years, during the rime of the present administration of the road, has been made out by reference to every warrant, in detail, and can therefore, contain no error; it must show, with perfect accu- racy, the total payments of this period, duly apportioned." This statement is headed "statement showing the total dis- bursement, in detail, from July 1st, 1855, to July 1st, 1858," and yet you see enormous accounts credited to Dudley and Ashley, and one J. Gr. Moore, since this committee icas appointed for work done as far back as 1856. Moore seems to be a doer of odd jobs about the shops, as we infer from the items of his ac- counts. He is charged w T ith cash, at sundry times, beginning in December, 1855, $12,473 67, and he is credited with esti- mates to the amount of $15,950 78, leaving balance due him, January 1st, 1859, of $3,477 11. We annex hereto No. 9, an exhibit of said account, and ISio. 10, items in his credits, as tending to show the general management of this road. You will see his credits on 1st December, 1S58 — after this committee was appointed — to the amount of $11,750 72. Much more than half thi. 11 50 " 41 a J. Weaver, 41 50 " 10 a Two (2) horse plough, 25 00 a l *2 a One (1) ' t 62 " 38i a J. Fruitt, 50 19 25 " 6 Months for self 234 00 " 28^ u Strayhorn, Grosston and others, time on time book, 28 50 $2,210 86 Credit his accout — charge shops constructor. C. F. ¥., Pres. lS5S-'9.] Document No. 71. 47 Account for June, 1857 : To Furnishing timber, making and delivering at wood shed 25,500 of 2 ft. shaved boards, $178 50 " 2 pair pants for Nat, hire by Co. of Dr. P. A. Holt, 3 00 " 2 shirts 1.50, 1 pair shoes from Worth 1.80, 3 30 " Cash piad for taking up thump out of founda- tion, 9 1 00 " Getting and delivering 30 large rock for wood shed, 10 00 " 37 pieces timber 8 + 8, 18 feet long for engine shed, 40 14 80 " Getting 25 10 feet sills, 30 7 50 " 4 candles from Worth to salt pork, 24 1858 To 1 keg white lead from McRae's, order of C. F. F., 3 00 " Cash paid negroes for watching plank, 3 00 " " P. E. Harden for plaster for foundry, 2 00 #226 34 Credit his account. C. F. F.. Pres. Account fob October : To 1504; days work by men, $150 25 27 " " Cook, 13 50 27 " Sup. self, 40 50 30 " "With two horse wagons, 75 00 6 " Dump cart, 9 00 10 " Topping trees, 15 00 9 " Hewing timber, 13 5o Account for November : To 179 days work by men, $179 00 "25 " Cook, 12 50 48 Document No. 71. [Session " 40^ days work, Two horse wagons, $100 62 " 13£ " Hewing timber, 20 25 ■« 25 " Sup. Self, 37 50 Account fok December : To 256f days work by men, $256 75 7 50 10 50 40 50 80 00 10 50 10 00 8 62 u 5 a hewing posts, (( 21 cc by Cook, a 27 « by self, super., a 32 cc by two-horse wagoD, a 3 it by three " « 2 a by four " a 5f a by dump cart, Credit his account — charge shops construction. $2,208 11 C. F. F., Pres. Account fok July : To 134| days work, by men, $ 134 75 " 27 " " " Cook, 13 50 " 24 " " " Hauling with 2 horse wagon, 66 25 » 27 " Supr. for self, 40 50 « 20 " " " Boys, 15 00 " 3£ " " " With Dump Cart, 5 25 " 2 " " " One horse wagon, 3 00 Account fok August : To 172£ days work by men, $172 25 « 26 " " " Cook, 13 00 « 26 " " Supr. for* self, 39 00 « 45 " " With two horse wagon, 112 50 « 43f " " With Dump Cart, " 65 62 " 5£ " " One horse wagon, 8 25 « 17 " " Topping trees, 25 50 199 75 13 00 8125 39 00 45 00 24 75 185S-'9.] Document, No. 71. 49 Account fok September : To 199f days work by men, 26 " " " Cook, 32£ " " Two horse wagons, 26 " " Supr. for self, 30 " " Dump. Cart, 16£ " " Topping trees, $1,117 12 From 1856 to December, 1858: To furnishing material, digging and walling 10 feet diameter, well timber taken out and 22 feet head water given, 52£ feet deep, at $22, $1,155 00 To furnishing material and digging well on Robert's Lot, 75 00 To furnishing material and digging well on Board- ing house Lot, 75 00 To furnisning " " " Capt. Allen's Lot, 75 00 To « " " " Supt. house " .75 00 To " " " " Hotel Lot, 75 00 To furnishing rock, lime, sand and labor, build 44f yards rock under tank, 111 25 To cash paid G. Andrews, for digging 1,432 feet ditch, 2£ feet, . 35 77 To cash paid W. A. Kirkpatrick, for four large stone for foundry, 1 00 To cash paid for 18 scrub-brooms for shops, 2 70 To furnishing material and digging 7 feet square well, and taking out all timber, 22 feet head water, $7 per foot, 322 00 $ 2,002 72 Credit his account. C. F. F., Preit. 4 50 Document No. 71. (No. 11.) [Session Indebtedness of Agents on Worth- Carolina Railroad at the end of the month of December^ 1858 : Charlotte, Harrisburg, Concord, Salisbury, Holtsburg, Lexington, Thomasville High Point, Jamestown, Greensboro' McLean's, Gibsonville, Co's. Shops, Graham, Haw River, Mebanes', Hillsboro', Durham's Morrisville, Raleigh, cc Stallings', Smithfield, Boon Hill, Carey's P.O. Golds! >oro', A. W. Welch, Agt. Wm. Johnston, " Jno. C. Young, " Jno. A. Weirman, " Steph. Roberts, " W". B. Dnsenbury, " L. L. Thomas, " A. V. Sullivan, " W. H. Reece, " J. B. Balsley, " Jas. M. McLean, " G. M. Isely, " D. M. Worth, " James S. Scott, " B. Y. McAden, " S. A. White, " J. D. Cameron, " F. A. Stagg, " C. P. Wilder, " G. D. Hardie, Frt. " J. T. West, Tic't. " L. P. Phillips, H. Millander, " Wiley Hastings, " A. F. Page, ' " J. B. Griswold, " Balance due from Agents now out of office : Smithfield, R. Fulghum, Goldsboro', W. H. Woodard, Haw River, R. W. Hamlet, (no bond,) DATE OF BONDS. PENAL TV. May 15, '58 Jan. 1, '59 Apr. 11, '56 May, 1858, no bond. no bond. Sept. 1, '57 Sept. 1, '57 Sept. 1, '57 Apr. 29, '56 Oct. 14, '57 Jim. 17, '58 Sept. 1, '57 Sept. 1, '57 Jan. 1859. May 31, '58 Sept. 1, '57 Apr. 21, '56 Oct. 6, '57 Aug. 1858, May 1858 Jury 1857, Aug. 2, '56 Apr. 17, '55 no bond. Oct. 23, '58 $3,000 1,000 2,000 3,000 2,000 3,000 1,000 2,000 1,000 1,000 3,00v 2,000 1,000 1,000 3,000 1.000 1,000 2,000 3,000 1,000 1,000 300 3,000 300 3.000 AMOUNT DUE. 2,029.24 37.53 293.68 7,044.93 320.19 37.49 180.61 560.34 000.00 462.42 60.77 07 00 122.70 51.18 523.36 241.68 00 275.70 1,697.06 5,023.56 814.40 750.50 282.55 112.72 2,601.18 1,018.19 5,279.62: 825.80* lS5S-'9.] Document No. 71. 51 (No. 12.) TABULAR STATEMENT Showing names of Directors each year — distinguishing thoss appointed by the stockholders and the State — with number of shares of stock owned by each at the time of his appoint- ment^ and amount received by each one since the road was Jinu-hed, so that he could travel free and expeditiously to the place of meeting : 1850. NO. 1852. SIIAHES 40 SHARES 'Win. C. Means, ' Means, 40 Jno. I. Shaver, 106 Ellis, 6 OD Jno. B. Lord, 106 CO Davis, 20' M w F. Fries, 80 T. J. WilsOn, (Salem Co.) 245. p J. W. Thomas, 81 P Thomas, 81 W j J. M. Morehead, 180 C Morehead, 180- 3 ■ Jno. A. Gilmer, 81 o Jones, 40 o Benj. Trolfnger, 20 o Holt, 20 CD Wm. A. Graham, 40 03 Saunders, 80 P" 1 It. M. Saunders, 80 Jerkins, 116 A. J. DeRossett, 150 Hill, 50 » L iY. T. Jerkins, 116 Gilmer, 81 1,0S0 959 1851. 1853. f W. C. Means, 40 r W. H. Washington 20 Jno. W. Ellis, 6 W. T. Dortch, 00 03 D. A. Davis, 20 a Samuel Hargrave, 20 F. Fries, SO Robert Strange, 00 P J. W. Thomas, 81 S. F. Phillips, ,5 o J. M. Morehead, ISO !* n N. G. Rand, 2 Jno. A. Gilmer, 81 R. P. Dick, 5 H Cad. J< tries, 40 , C. F. Fisher, 10 f Fries, 80 Hill, Davis, 50 20 794 1^ Morehead, 180 330 52 Document No. 71. [Session TABULAR STATEMENT.— [Continued. j 1854. NO. SHAKES 1855. NO. SHAKES f Fisher, 10 P. C. Cameron, 33 Strange, 1 Giles Mebane, 48 IT Rand, 2 13 Bellamy, 5 < H - 00 Dick, 5 < CO Dortch, 20 Jno. Berry, Hawkins, 92 G. S. Stevenson, lh Shaver, 314 Hargrave, 20 Dick, 12 [ Dortch, 20 Hargrave, 20 58 544 M f Fries, 114 M f Fisher, 10 | 1 0. Phifer, 23 o o Fries, 114 m ] Saunders, 50 Saunders, 20 £ [Morehead, 88 [A. Hcllae & Co., 885 275 1,029 1856 NO. AMOUNT Ino.days SHARES RECEIVED. SERVICE. pick, 12 $ 84 40 8 Mebane, 48 64 90 8 i Cameron, 38 40 90 7 Hawkins, 92 112 00 8 m ' Shaver, 314 118 40 7 Hargrave, 20 105 00 8 Bellamy, 5 129 80 6 Dortch, 20 86 60 5 549 W ["Fisher, 108 o j Fries, 114 i 110 00 8 S i Saunders, 20 | 74 40 4 tMcRae&Co., 885 j 78 40 2 1858-'9.] Document No. 71. 53 TABULAR STATEMENT.— [Continued.] iss; < Cameron, Mebane, Bellamy, Dortcli, Hawkins, Shaver, Dick, Hargrave, , ; f Fisher, o I Saunders, h -I Fries, ^ I Gorrell, « LMcRae, 1858. D. M. Barringer. Cameron, Bellamy, Dortcli, 1