C<3.0/*t 
 
 working paper 
 
 <^0 
 
 Information 
 
 CImIiaISaa 
 
 ofafisTics 
 
 A Topical Bibliography 
 
 U.S. Department of Commerce 
 BUREAU OF THE CENSUS 
 
Digitized by the Internet Archive 
 
 in 2012 with funding from 
 
 LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation 
 
 http://archive.org/details/informationprivaOOdale 
 
working paper 
 
 <m 
 
 Information 
 
 Privacy 
 and 
 
 Statistics 
 
 TODICal BIDIIOt 
 
 
 by Tore Dalenius 
 
 <^ T0F <v 
 
 U.S. Department of Commerce 
 
 Juanita M. Kreps, Secretary 
 Courtenay M. Slater, Chief Economist 
 
 BUREAU OF THE CENSUS 
 Manuel D. Plotkin, Director 
 
 Issued July 1978 
 
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS 
 Manuel D. Plotkin, Director 
 Robert L. Hagan, Deputy Director 
 
 Harold Nisselson, Associate Director 
 
 for Statistical Standards and 
 
 Methodology 
 
 STATISTICAL RESEARCH DIVISION 
 James L O'Brien, Acting Chief 
 
 The bibliographic citations and format were developed by the author and 
 do not represent the views or opinions of the Bureau of the Census. 
 
 Library of Congress Card No. 78-600059 
 
 SUGGESTED CITATION 
 
 U.S. Bureau of the Census, Information Privacy and Statistics: A 
 Topical Bibliography, by Tore Dalenius (Bureau of the Census 
 Working Paper No. 41). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washing- 
 ton. D.C., 1978. 
 
 For sale by the Subscriber Services (Publications), Bureau of the Census, 
 Washington, DC, 20233, and U.S. Department of Commerce field offices. 
 Price $2.25. 
 
FOREWORD 
 
 The Bureau of the Census welcomes the opportunity to publish this 
 bibliography with the expectation that it will provide a much needed resource 
 for access to the literature on privacy, confidentiality, and security in 
 censuses and surveys. It is intended that the bibliography will serve as a ready 
 reference tool to the staff of the Bureau, other federal agencies, and state and 
 local governments as well as public and private organizations engaged in 
 producing official statistics. 
 
 Manuel D. Plotkin 
 
 Director 
 
 Bureau of the Census 
 
PREFACE 
 
 This bibliography is a byproduct of my research project 
 "Personintegritet vid Statistiska Undersokningar" ("Confi- 
 dentiality in Surveys"), generously supported by the Bank of 
 Sweden Tercentenary Foundation. This origin is reflected in 
 both the areas covered and the taxonomy used. 
 
 As the title implies, the bibliography focuses on the privacy 
 issue in the realm of statistical information systems (in contrast 
 to administrative information systems). With that broad scope, 
 it encompasses references concerning both sample and census 
 surveys, and also "data banks." In developing the bibliography, 
 I have taken into account the fact that there are already 
 bibliographies easily available dealing with the development of 
 security in computer systems up to around 1974; I have 
 supplemented these bibliographies with some recent references. 
 
 Users of this bibliography will no doubt realize that it is not 
 a perfect product: 
 
 i. Most references are from the American literature; im- 
 portant contributions from British, French, German and 
 Scandinavian literature are omitted. 
 ii. In that restricted domain, there are, no doubt, coverage 
 
 errors, both of omission and commission, 
 iii. There are in addition, no doubt, errors in content: the 
 classification of some references may be debatable or even 
 wrong; as a means of reducing the impact of this 
 shortcoming, I have chosen to have references appear in 
 more than one category when dealing with ambiguous 
 cases. 
 
 The compilation of a "large" bibliography would be a most 
 demanding task if it had to be carried out from scratch. I have 
 been privileged in obtaining help from many colleagues, 
 especially Professor Robert F. Boruch, Northwestern University, 
 and Professors David M. Flaherty and Edward H. Hanis, 
 University of Western Ontario, who kindly supplied me with 
 sets of references, many of which have been incorporated into 
 this bibliography. Dr. Josiah Standberg, Providence, R.I. com- 
 puterized the compilation of the bibliography (using the PRESS 
 system at the computer facility at Brown University) to my 
 great satisfaction. 
 
 In retrospect — having previously made two bibliographies in 
 my field of interest and experienced all the agonies and 
 frustrations associated with that kind of undertaking — I am 
 somewhat surprised that I undertook another one. There is, 
 however, a straightforward explanation: the strong encourage- 
 ment and support that I received from the former Director of 
 the U.S. Bureau of the Census, Mr. Vincent P. Barabba, wne n I 
 was contemplating the task now finished. 
 
 Tore E. Dalenius 
 Division of Applied Mathematics 
 Brown University 
 Providence, R.I. 02912 
 
INFORMATION PRIVACY AND STATISTICS 
 
 1. THE MEANING OF PRIVACY 
 
 1. 1 References of Historical Interest 
 
 1.2 Modern References 
 
 2. THE THREATS AGAINST THE PRIVACY 
 
 2. 1 General References 
 
 2.2 Administrative Records 
 
 2.3 Statistics 
 
 2. 4 Computers and Data Banks 
 
 2. 5 Other References 
 
 Part One: Statistical Information Systems 
 
 3. RESPONDENT REACTION TO SURVEYS 
 
 4. THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY VS. THE NEED TO KNOW 
 
 5. LEGISIATION, STATUTES, AND REGULATIONS 
 
 5. 1 United States 
 
 5.2 Canada 
 
 5.3 United Kingdom 
 
 5. 4 West Germany 
 
 5. 5 Sweden 
 
 5.6 Other Countries 
 
 6. ENDS AND MEANS OF PRIVACY PROTECTION IN STATISTICAL 
 INFORMATION SYSTEMS - OVERVIEWS 
 
 7. ETHICAL STANDARDS AND RELATED TOPICS 
 
 7. 1 Standards for Statisticians 
 
 7.2 Standards for Other Professionals 
 
 7. 3 Related Topics 
 
 8. KEY DESIGN ASPECTS 
 
 8. 1 Public vs. Personal Information 
 
 8.2 Identifiers; Anonymity; Confidentiality 
 
 8.3 Records: Administrative vs. Statistical Uses 
 
 8. 4 Record Linkage 
 
 9. PROTECTIVE TECHNIQUES - DATA COLLECTION: SAMPLING 
 
 -1- 
 
10. PROTECTIVE TECHNIQUES - DATA COLLECTION: MEASUREMENT 
 
 10. 1 Randomized Response 
 
 10.2 Combined Questions 
 
 10.3 Other Measurement Techniques 
 
 10.4 Comparisons of Techniques 
 
 11. PROTECTIVE TECHNIQUES - DATA PROCESSING AND STORAGE 
 
 11.1 File Techniques 
 
 11.2 Agqregation Techniques 
 
 11.3 Privacy Transformations; Encryption 
 
 11.4 Other Techniques 
 
 12. PROTECTIVE TECHNIQUES - SECURITY IN COMPUTER SYSTEMS 
 
 13. PROTECTIVE TECHNIQUES - RELEASE OF STATISTICS 
 
 14. APPLICATIONS 
 
 14. 1 United States 
 
 14.2 Other Countries 
 
 Part Two: Related References 
 
 15. PRIVACY AND RESEARCH 
 
 15.1 General References 
 
 15.2 Social Research 
 
 15.3 Behavioral Research 
 
 15.4 Medical Research 
 
 15.5 Other Areas 
 
 16. PRIVACY AND ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 
 
 16. 1 General References 
 
 16.2 Criminal Justice and Law Enforcement 
 
 16.3 Schools and Colleges 
 
 16. 4 Health Care 
 
 16.5 Credit Industry 
 
 16.6 Other Areas 
 
 Part Three: Additional References 
 
 17. PERIODICALS 
 
 17. 1 Periodicals: Names and Addresses 
 17.2 Selected Issues 
 
 18. BIBLIOGRAPHIES 
 
 -2- 
 
1. 1- 1 
 
 1. THE MEANING OF PRIVACY 
 
 1. 1 References of Historical Interest 
 
 DAVIS, R. C. 
 
 Confidentiality and the census, 1790-1929. 
 
 In: WARE, W. H. , Chairman, Records^ computers and the rights 
 
 P.! citizens. 
 
 Report of the Secretary*s Advisory Committee on Automated 
 
 Data Systems. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1973. 
 
 DWORKIN, G. 
 
 The common law protection of privacy. 
 
 Tasmania University Law Review, Vol. 2, 1967, 418-445. 
 
 GODKIN, E. L. 
 
 The rights of the citizen - IV: to his reputation, 
 Scribnerj.s Magazine, vol. 8, 1890, 58-67. 
 
 WARREN, S. D., and BRANDEIS, L. D. 
 The right to privacy. 
 Harvard Law Review, Vol. 4, 
 289-320. 
 
 No. 
 
 5, December 15, 1890, 
 
1. 2-1 
 
 1.2 Modern References 
 
 ADAMS, E. L. 
 
 The right to privacy and its relation to the law of libel. 
 £JH££ican Law Review, Vol. 39, January - February 1905, 
 37-38. 
 
 ALSCHULER, A. W. 
 
 A different view of privacy. 
 
 Texas Law Review, Vol. 49, 1971, 872-888. 
 
 ALTMAN, I. 
 
 Privacy: a conceptual analysis. 
 
 In: MARGULIS, S., Ed. Privacy 
 
 Dowden, Hutchinson 8 Ross, Stroudsberg, Pennsylvania, 1974. 
 
 BAIN, H. 
 
 Privacy: what's happening to a fundamental right? 
 
 SDC Magazine, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, 
 
 California, Vol. 10, July-August 1967, 1-24. 
 
 BAKER, M. A. 
 
 Record privacy as a marginal problem: the limits of 
 
 consciousness and concern. 
 
 Columbia Human Rights Law Review., Vol 4, No. 1., 1972, 
 
 89-100. 
 
 BATES, A. 
 
 Privacy - a useful concept? 
 
 Social Forces, 1964, Vol. 42, 429-434. 
 
 BLOUSTEIN, E. J. 
 
 Privacy as an aspect of human dignity: an answer to Dean 
 
 Prosser. 
 
 New York University Law Review, Vol. 39, 1964, 96 2-1007. 
 
 BRECKENRIDGE, A. C. 
 
 The right to privacy. 
 
 University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, 1970. 
 
1.2-2 
 
 BURNS, P. 
 
 Privacy and the law: 1984 is now. 
 
 New Zealand Law Journal, Jan. 22, 1974, 1-4. 
 
 CLARKE, C. F. 
 
 Private rights and freedom of the individual. Report of a 
 
 conference at Ditchely Park. 
 
 American Ditchely Foundation, New York, 1972. 
 
 DAVIS, K. C. 
 
 The information act: a preliminary analysis. 
 
 University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 34, 1967, 761-816. 
 
 DAVIS, R. H. 
 
 Privacy and security in data systems. 
 
 Computers and Peop_le, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1974, 20-27. 
 
 DAVIS, R. H. 
 
 A technologist's view of privacy and security in automated 
 
 information systems. 
 
 Rutgers Journal of Computers and Law, Vol. 4, 1975, 264-293. 
 
 DWORKIN, G. 
 
 The common law protection of privacy. 
 
 Tasmania University Law Review, Vol. 2, 1967, 418-445. 
 
 ERNST, M. L., and SCHWARTZ A. U. 
 
 Privacryx the right to be let alone. 
 
 Milestones of Law Series, The Macmillan Co., New York and 
 
 London, 1962. 
 
 FRIED, C. 
 
 Privacy: social foundations of the right to privacy. 
 Yale Law Journal, Vol. 77, 1968, 475-493. 
 
 GERETY, T. 
 
 Redefining privacy. 
 
 Harvard Civil Rights - Civil Liberties Law Review, 1977, 
 
 Vol. 12, 233-296. 
 
1.2-3 
 
 GEFSTEIN, F. S. 
 
 P£iZ§C21 the right to be left alone. 
 Houghton Mifflin, New York, 1973. 
 
 GLENN, H. P. 
 
 Civil responsibility - right to privacy in Quebec - recent 
 
 cases. 
 
 The Canadian Bar Review, Vol. 52, 1974, 297-305. 
 
 GOLDSTEIN, F. F. 
 
 The constitutional rights of privacy: a sizable hunk. 
 MarXiand. Law Review, Vol. 26, 1966, 249-255. 
 
 GFEENAWALT, K. 
 
 Privacy and its legal protection. 
 
 Hastings Center Studies, Vol. 2, 1974, 45-68 
 
 GEISWOLD, E. N. 
 
 The right to be let alone. 
 
 Northwestern Law Review, Vol. 44, 1960, 216-226 
 
 GFOSS, H. 
 
 Privacy - its legjil protection. 
 
 Oceana Publication, Dobbs Ferry, New York, 1964. 
 
 GFOSS, H. 
 
 The concept of privacy. 
 
 New York University Law Review, Vol. 42, March 1967, 34-54, 
 
 HALMOS, P. 
 
 Solitude and p_r ivacy_-. 
 
 Eoutledge Z Kegan Paul, London, 1952. 
 
 HOFSTADTEF, S. H. , and HOROWITZ, G. 
 The right of privacy.. 
 Central Book Co., New York, 1964. 
 
 HOGLUND, J. A., and KAHN, J. 
 
 Invasion of privacy and the Freedom of Information Act, 
 
 Getman v. NLRB. 
 
 George Washington Law Review, Vol. 40, 1972, 527-541. 
 
1.2-4 
 
 HULETT, M. 
 
 Privacy and the Freedom of Information Act. 
 Administrative Law Review, Vol. 27, 1975, 275-294. 
 
 JOHNSON, C. 
 
 Privacy as personal control. 
 
 In: MARGULIS, S. Ed., Privacy. 
 
 Dowden, Hutchinson 5 Ross, Stroudsberg, Pennsylvania, 1974. 
 
 JOSEPHSON, E. 
 
 Notes on the sociology of privacy. 
 Humanitas, Vol. 11, 1975, 15-25. 
 
 JOSEPHSON, M. S. 
 
 Extensive critical review of westin*s Privacy and Freedom. 
 UCLA Intramural Law Review, Vol. 15, 1968, 1586-1605. 
 
 JUSTICE SOCIETY 
 
 P.Lkl£k9.X illlil the law : a report. 
 Stevens 8 Sons Limited, London, 1970. 
 
 KLONVITZ, M. R. 
 
 Privacy and the law: a philosophical prelude. 
 
 Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 31, 1966, 27- 280. 
 
 KRAUSE, H. D. 
 
 Right to privacy in Germany: pointers for American 
 
 legislation. 
 
 DuJi£ Law Journal, Summer, 1965, 481-530. 
 
 KRIEGER, S. 
 
 RlLI&£I is not the issue. Mim. report. 
 
 The Institute for Communication Research, Stanford 
 
 University, Stanford, California, 1971. 
 
 LAWFORD, H. 
 
 Privacy versus freedom of information. 
 
 0.ueenj_s Quarterly, Vol. 78, No. 3, 1971, 365-371 
 
1.2-5 
 
 LEVINE, M. E. 
 
 Privacy from the invaders point of vie w / Ph.D. Dissertation. 
 City University of New York, New York, 1972. 
 
 LUNDSGAARDE, H. P. 
 
 Privacy: an anthropological perspective on the right to be 
 
 let alone. 
 
 Houston Law Reports, Vol. 8, 1970-71, 858-875. 
 
 LUSKY, L. 
 
 Invasion of privacy: a clarification of concepts. 
 Columbia Law Review, Vol. 72, 1972, 693-710. 
 
 LUSKY, L. 
 
 Invasion of privacy: a clarification of concepts. 
 Political Science Quarterly., Vol. 87, 1972, 192-209. 
 
 MARCELL, D. W. 
 
 Privacy and the American character. 
 
 South Atlantic Quarterly, Vol. 66, Winter 197 1, 1-12. 
 
 MARGULIS, S. 
 
 Privacy as a behavioral phenomenon: coming of age. 
 
 In: MARGULIS, S. Ed., Privacy. 
 
 Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsberg, Pennsylvania, 
 
 1974. 265-281. 
 
 MAYER, M. F. 
 
 Rights of privacy. 
 
 Law-Arts Publishers, New York, 1972. 
 
 MCKAY, R. B. 
 
 The rights of privacy: emanations and intimations. 
 Hichiaan Law Review, Vol. 64, 1965, 259-282. 
 
 MEHPABIAN, A. 
 
 E^tlli . Elaces and private spaces. 
 
 Basic Books Inc., Publishers, New York, 1976. 
 
1.2-6 
 
 MILLER, A.R. 
 
 Personal privacy in the computer age: the challenge of a new 
 technology in an information-oriented society. 
 Michigan Law Review, Vol. 67 r 1969, 1091-1246. 
 
 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 
 
 Right to privacy: social interest and legal right. 
 Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 51, 1967, 531-51. 
 
 MOSS, J. 
 
 Confidentiality and identity. 
 
 Socio- Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 4, March 1970, 17-25 
 
 MOSSMANN, C. 
 
 Privacy and anonymity. 
 Datamation, Feb. 1976, 168-170, 
 
 NEETHLING, J. 
 
 The right of privacy: a comparison of American and English 
 law. Dissertation on Microfilm. No. 15945. 
 National Library, Ottawa. Undated. 
 
 PARKER, R. B. 
 
 A definition of privacy. 
 
 Rutgers Law Review, Vol. 27, 1974, 275-296. 
 
 PASTALAN, L. A. 
 
 Privacy as a behavioral concept. 
 
 Social Science, Vol. 45, April 1972, 93-117. 
 
 PENNOCK, J. R. and CHAPMAN, J. W., Eds. 
 
 Privacy^ Nemos XIIIl Yearboook of the American Society for 
 Political and Lecjal Philosaptvy- 
 Atherton Press, New York, 1971. 
 
 PROSSER, W. L. 
 Privacy. 
 California Law Review, Vol. 48, 1960, 389-392 
 
1.2-7 
 
 REIMAN, J. H. 
 
 Privacy, intimacy, and personhood. 
 
 PhilosoEhi & Public Affairs, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1976, 26-44. 
 
 ROBERTS, J. M. and GREGOR, Y. 
 Privacy: a cultural view. 
 
 Yearbook °f "the American Society for Political and Legal 
 Philosophy, Vol. 13, 1971, 199-225. 
 
 ROSENGARTEN, S. 
 
 The right to privacy - origin and scope. 
 
 Criminal Justice Quarterly, Vol. 2, Winter, 1974 54-57. 
 
 ROSS, I. 
 
 What right of privacy? 
 
 Reader's Digest, Nov. 1974, 41-50. 
 
 SACKMAN, H. and NIE, N. , Eds. 
 
 The information utility and social choice. 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, New Jersey, 1970. 
 
 SCHWARTZ, B. 
 
 The social psychology of privacy. 
 
 American Journal of Socio lo<iy, Vol. 73, 1968, 741-752. 
 
 SHILS, E. 
 
 Privacy: its constitution and vicissitudes. 
 
 L§.w and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 31, 1966, 281-306. 
 
 SIMMEL, A. 
 
 Privacy of collectivities. 
 
 In: SILLS, D. L., Ed., International encyclopedia of the 
 
 soc i a 1 sciences . 
 
 MacMillan and Free Press, New York, 1968, 483-484. 
 
 SIMMEL, A. 
 
 Privacy. 
 
 In: SILLS, D. L., Ed., International encyclopedia of the 
 
 social sciences. 
 
 MacMillan and Free Press, New York, 1968. 
 
1.2-: 
 
 SIMMEL, A. 
 
 Privacy is not an isolated freedom. 
 
 In: PENNOCK, J. R. and CHAPMAN, J. W. Eds., Privacy. 
 
 Atherton Press, New York, 1971. 
 
 SLOUGH, M. C. 
 
 Privac_y_ x freed om x and responsibility. 
 Thomas Press, Springfield, Illinois, 1969. 
 
 STREET, H. 
 
 Privacy and the law. 
 
 0.ueenVs £, Vol. 77, No. 3, 1970, 318-32. 
 
 STE0MHOLM, STIG. 
 
 l±3kt of privacy; and rights of the personality A 
 
 comparative survey; . 
 
 P. A. Norstedt & Sjzfners Fjzfrlag, Stockholm, 1967. 
 
 TAEUBER, R. C. 
 
 The right to privacy. 
 
 Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 
 
 Vol. 1, No. 10, May 1975, 17-18. 
 
 WARREN, S. D., and BRANDEIS, L. D. 
 The right to privacy. 
 
 H^£vard Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 5, December 15, 1890, 
 289-320. 
 
 WEBER, S. J. 
 
 Habeas data: the right of privacy versus computer 
 
 surveillance. 
 
 University of San Francisco Law Reports, Vol. 5, 1971, 
 
 358-377. 
 
 WEISSTUB, D. N., and GOTLIEB, C. C. 
 
 The nature, of privacy. A study by the Privacy and Computers 
 
 Task Force. Department of Communications/Department of 
 
 Justice. 
 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, undated. 
 
1.2-9 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. 
 
 Privacy and freedom. 
 Atheneum, New York, 1967. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. and BAKER, M. A. 
 
 Databanks in a free society: computers x record-keeping and 
 
 privacy . 
 
 Quadrangle Books, New York, 1972. 
 
 WILLIAMS, J. S. 
 
 Legal protection of Privacy. A study by the Privacy and 
 Computers Task Force. Department of Communications/ 
 Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
2. 1-1 
 
 2. THE THREATS AGAINST THE PRIVACY 
 2. 1 General References 
 
 ALLEN, D. 
 
 Problems of access to government data, Part I, SSRC 
 Newsletter No. 9, June 1970, 26-28, Part II SSRC Newsletter 
 No. 10, November 1970, 17-20. 
 Social Science Research Council, New York, 1970. 
 
 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION. 
 
 PROJECT ON PRIVACY AND DATA COLLECTION. 
 
 The privacy report. Vol. 1, No. 1, to Vol. 2, No. 2, August 
 
 1973 to September 1974. 
 
 American Civil Union Foundation, Washington, D.C. 
 
 ARMER, P. 
 
 The individual: his privacy, self image, and obsolescence. 
 In: U. S. CONGRESS. HOUSE. Committee on Science and 
 Aeronautics: The Management of information and knowledge, 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, 1970. 
 Also in: Computers and People, June 1975, 18 - 23. 
 
 AUFRECHT, S. E. Ed. 
 
 ExEandincj the right to .privacy.. Research and legislative 
 
 initiatives for the future. Proceedings of a seminar, 
 
 October 14-15, 1976. 
 
 University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, 
 
 1976. 
 
 BAIN, H. 
 
 Privacy: what's happening to a fundamental right? 
 
 SDC Magazine, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, 
 
 California, Vol. 10, July-August 1967, 1-24. 
 
 BERADO, F. 
 
 Marital envisibility and family privacy. 
 
 In: MARGULIS, S., Ed. Privacy. 
 
 Dowden, Hutchinson 8 Ross, Stroudsberg, Pennsylvania, 1974. 
 
2. 1-2 
 
 BRECKENRIDGE, A. C. 
 
 The right to privacy.. 
 
 University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, 1970. 
 
 BPENTON, H. 
 
 The privacy invaders. 
 Coward-McCann, New York, 1964. 
 
 CANADA. TASK ON GOVERNMENT INFORMATION 
 
 To know and be knownj. report. Vol. I. 1969, 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, 1974. 
 
 CHERMAYEFF, S. and ALEXANDER, C. 
 
 Community, and £rivacy_l towards a new architecture of 
 
 humanism. 
 
 Anchor Books, New York, 1965. 
 
 COHEN, R. E. 
 
 Justice report/protection of citizens: privacy becomes major 
 
 federal concern. 
 
 National Journal Reports, 10 December 1974, 1521-1530. 
 
 COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS 
 
 Privacy _[A summary of a seminar on privacy) . 
 
 The Council of State Governments, Lexington, Kentucky, 1975. 
 
 DENENBERG, R. V. 
 
 Administrative searches and the right of privacy in the 
 
 United States, 
 
 International and Comparative Law Quarterly Vol. 23, 1974, 
 
 169-177. 
 
 DITCHELY FOUNDATION 
 
 Private rights and freedom of the individual. Ditchely 
 Paper No. 41. 
 
 The Ditchely Foundation, Ditchely Park, Ernstone, 
 Oxfordshire, England, 1972. 
 
 DIXON, R. G. , Jr. 
 
 The Griswold penumbra: constitutional charter for an 
 
 expanded law of privacy? 
 
 tf.ichig.an Law Review, Vol. 64, 1965, 197-218. 
 
2. 1-3 
 
 DOMESTIC COUNCIL COMMITTEE ON THE BIGHT OF PRIVACY and THE 
 COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS 
 
 Privacy (A summary of a seminar on privacy), December 15-17, 
 
 1974, Washington, D. C. , 
 
 The Council of State Governments, Lexington, Kentucky, 1975. 
 
 GIBSON, R. D., and SHARP, J. M. 
 
 Privacy and commercial reporting agencies. Report No. 1. 
 Legal Research Institute, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, 
 1968. 
 
 GOLDSWORTHY, A. W. 
 
 The invasion of privacy - its administrative impact. 
 Public Administration, Vol. 23, March 1974, 9-23. 
 
 GORDON, A. C, HEINZ, J. P., GOPDON, M. C, and DIVORSKI, S. , 
 
 Public information and public access: a sociological 
 
 interpretation. 
 
 Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 6 8, 1973, 280-308. 
 
 GREENAWALT, K. 
 
 Privacy and its legal protection. 
 
 Hastings Center Studies, Vol. 2, 1974, 4 5-68. 
 
 GREENWALT, K. 
 
 L6.99L1 £rotections of privacy^ final report to the Office of 
 
 Telecommunications Policy. 
 
 Office of Telecommunications Policy, Washington, D. C. , 
 
 1975. 
 
 GREGORY, F. M., and ANDREWS, W. H. 
 
 The privacy debate - business must be seen and heard 
 Oat a Management, Vol. 13, Aug. 19 75, 32-36. 
 
 HELLNER, J. 
 
 Datenschutz in Schweden. 
 
 In: REICHERT-FACILIDES, F. , RITTNER, F., and SASSE, J., 
 
 Eds., Festschrift fur Reimer Schmidt. 
 
 Verlag Versicherungswirtschaf t E.V., Karlsruhe, Germany, 
 
 1976, 265-283. 
 
2. 1-4 
 
 HOLLANDER, P. 
 
 Privacy: a bastion stormed. 
 
 Problems in Communism, Vol, 12, 1963, 1-9. 
 
 HC 'DIUS, F. W. 
 
 Emercjina data 2£2£©c_tion in Europe. 
 
 North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1 975, 
 
 JC HARD, S. M. 
 
 Some psychological aspects of privacy. 
 
 Law S Contemporary Problems, Vol. 31, No. 3, 1966, 307-31 
 
 "<AI/EN, H., Jr. 
 
 The problems of privacy in the year 2000. 
 Daedalus, Summer 1967, 876-882. 
 
 K.TRSHAW, D. N., and SMALL, J. C. 
 
 Data confidentiality and privacy: lessons from the New 
 Jersey negative income tax experiment. 
 Public Policy, Vol. 20, 1972, 257-280. 
 
 KOSKOFF, T. I., Chairman 
 
 Privacy in a free society. Final report. Annual Chief 
 Justice Earl Warren conference on advocacy in the United 
 States, June 7-8, 1974. 
 
 Roscoe Pound - American Trial Lawyers Foundation, Cambridge, 
 Massachusetts, 1974. 
 
 LARSEN, K. S., Ed. 
 
 Plil^cy^ a public concern: a resource document. 
 
 Seminar on Privacy, Washington, D.C., 1975 
 
 U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1975. 
 
 LP OND, A. and FRY, D. 
 
 No p_lace to hide^ a guide to bug. wiretaps^ surveillance and 
 
 other P_riyacy invasions. 
 
 St. Martin's Press, New York, 1975. 
 
 LEWIN, N. 
 
 What has happened to the right of privacy? 
 The New Republic, May 15, 1976, 15-17. 
 
2. 1-5 
 
 LEWIN, N. 
 
 What may happen to the right of privacy. 
 The New Republic, May 2 9, 1976, 13-17. 
 
 LINOWES, D.F., Chairman 
 
 Personal privacy, in an information society^ The report of 
 the Privacy P ro tection Study Commission. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1977. 
 
 LONG, E. V. 
 
 The intruders^ the invasion of priyac_y by government and 
 
 i n &u s t r y_ . 
 
 Praeger, New York, 1967. 
 
 LOWI, T. J, Ed.. 
 
 Private life and public orderj_ the context of modern public 
 
 pol icy . 
 
 Norton, New York, 1968. 
 
 MADGWICK, D. and SMYTHE, T. 
 
 The invasion of privacy. 
 
 Pitman Publishing Corporation, New York, N.Y., 1974. 
 
 MALISOFF, H. 
 
 Data and confidentiality in a free society. 
 
 The New York Statistician, Vol. 19, Sept. -Oct. 1967, 1-2. 
 
 MALLMANN, C. 
 
 Das Problem der Pr ivatsphaere innerhalb des Datenschut zes. 
 (The problem of individual privacy in data security.) 
 Der of fent lichen Verwaltung., Vol. 5, 1971, 19-26. 
 
 MILLER, A. R. 
 
 Privacy in the corporate state: a constitutional value of 
 
 dwindling significance. 
 
 Journal of Public Law, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1973, 3-35. 
 
 NIXON, R. M. 
 
 The American right of privacy, The President's address on 
 
 nationwide radio, February 23, 1974. 
 
 Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, Vol. 10, 1974, 
 
 245-247. 
 
2. 1-6 
 
 OECD 
 
 Policy issues in data protection and privacy. Concepts and 
 perspectives. 
 
 Proceedings of the OECD seminar, June 24-26, 1974. OECD 
 Informatics Studies, 
 
 )rganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 
 Paris, 1976. 
 
 P/iMBER, D. R. 
 
 RlL!&Q.I ajlil the p_ress. 
 
 University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1972. 
 
 \PINSKY, H. , Ed. 
 
 £§P£i^ and information. 
 
 Pergamon General Psychology Series, Vol. 6 
 
 The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 
 
 PRIVACY PROTECTION STUDY COMMISSION 
 
 Personal privacy in an in formation society. The report of 
 the Privacy Protection Study Commission. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1977. 
 
 PAINES, J. C. 
 
 Attack on privacy. 
 
 Judson Press, Valley Forge, Pennsylvania 1974 
 
 RATCLIFFE, J. M., Ed. 
 
 ££i.y.acy.j_ policy and the law. 
 Doubleday, New York, 1971. 
 
 HODES, G. 
 
 The Younger Committee research. 
 
 Public Administration, Vol. 51 1973, 449-60 
 
 ROBERTSON, A. H. Ed. 
 
 Privacy and human rights. 
 
 Manchester University Press, Manchester, England, 1973. 
 
 ROSENBERG, J. 
 
 Iks death of p_rivacy_. 
 
 Random House, New York, 1969. 
 
2. 1-7 
 
 RYAN, H. 
 
 Blaming the victim. 
 Pantheon, New York, 1971. 
 
 SHARP, J. M. 
 
 The control and accessibility of private data held in the 
 federal public service of Canada. 
 Optimum, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1971, 6-14. 
 
 SHATTUCK, J. H. F. 
 
 Rights of P_rivacy.. 
 
 National Textbook Company, Skokie, Illinois, 1977. 
 
 SHUBIK, M. 
 
 Information, rationality, and free choice. 
 Daedalus, Vol. 96, Summer 1967, 771-778. 
 
 SMITH, R. R. 
 
 The Privacy Act's impact on Federal labor relations. 
 Public Personnel Management, Vol. 5, Jan. -Feb. 1976, 33-40, 
 
 STEVENS, J. 
 
 Access to personal data files: I. Freedom of Information 
 Center Report No. 288. 
 
 University of Missouri School of Journalism, Columbia, 
 Missouri, 1972. 
 
 STEVENS, J. 
 
 Access to .personal data files: II. Freedom of Information 
 Center Report No. 291. 
 
 University of Missouri School of Journalism, Columbia, 
 Missouri, 1972. 
 
 STEWART, V. R. 
 
 Problems of confidentiality in the administration of 
 
 personal case records. 
 
 The American Archivist, Vol. 37, No. 3, 1974, 387-398. 
 
 U. K. HOME OFFICE. 
 
 Report of the Committee on Privacy. Cmnd. 5012, 
 Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1972. 
 
2. 1- 
 
 U. K. HOUSE OF COMMONS. 
 
 JilHlLt of privacy. Parliamentary Debates, Commons, Vol, 
 8 February 1967, Col. 1565-1568. 
 
 740, 
 
 K. HOUSE OF COMMONS 
 
 Control of personal information. Parliamentary 
 Commons, Vol. 830, 8 February 1972, Col. 1139-1142, 
 
 Debates , 
 
 U. K. LAW COMMISSION 
 
 Breach of confidence. Working Paper No. 58. 
 Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1974 
 
 UNITED NATIONS. COMMISSION ON HUMAN EIGHTS 
 
 H pi man rights and scientific and technological developments^ 
 
 Uses of electronics which may affect the rights of the 
 
 person and _che limits which should be placed on such uses in 
 
 a democratic society 
 
 Report of the Secretary-General, E/CN. 4/1142, 31 January 
 
 1974; E/CN. 4/1 1 42/Add 1 . , 9 January 1974; E/CN. 4/1 142/Add2. , 
 
 7 October 1974. 
 
 United Nations, New York, 1974. 
 
 U. S. CONGRESS. HOUSE. 
 
 Committee on Government operations. Special Subcommittee on 
 
 Invasion of Privacy. 
 
 Special inguiry on invasion of privacy, Hearings before the 
 
 Special Subcommittee. 89th Cong., 1st sess. , June and 
 
 September, 1965, and 2nd sess.. May, 1966. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1966. 
 
 U. S. CONGRESS. HOUSE. 
 
 Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. Subcommittee on 
 
 Postal Operations. 
 
 Privacy in the mail. Hearings before the Subcommittee. 
 
 90th Cong., 2nd sess., July, 1968. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1968. 
 
 S. CONGRESS. HOUSE. 
 
 Committee on Government Operations. Foreign Operations and 
 
 Government InformationSubcommittee. 
 
 A££ess to Records, Hearings, 93d Congress, 2d session, on H. 
 
 R. 12206 and related bills. 
 
 U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1974. 
 
2. 1-9 
 
 U. S. CONGRESS. HOUSE. 
 
 Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. Subcommittee on 
 
 Retirement and Employee Benefits. 
 
 LiilhJ: to EILivacv. of federal employees. Hearings, 9 3d 
 
 Congress, 1st and 2d sessions, on H. R. 1281 and related 
 
 bills. 
 
 U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1974. 
 
 S. CONGRESS.. SENATE. 
 
 Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Administrative 
 
 Practice and Procedure. 
 
 Questionaire relating to invasions of pri va cy. . 88th Cong., 
 
 2nd sess. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1964. 
 
 S. CONGRESS. SENATE. 
 
 Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Administrative 
 
 Practice and Procedure. 
 
 Invasions of 2£ivacy_ A Pacts Vz£ll Hearings before the 
 
 Subcommittee. 89th Cong., 1st and 2nd sess. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1965 and 
 
 1966. 
 
 U. S. CONGRESS. SENATE. 
 
 Committee on the Judiciary- Subcommittee on Administrative 
 
 Practice and Procedure. 
 
 Government dossier^ survey of information contained in 
 
 government files, committee print. 90th Cong., 1st sess., 
 
 November, 1967. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1967. 
 
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE 
 
 E^cords^ computers and the rights of citizens. Report of the 
 
 Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data 
 
 Systems 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1973. 
 
 U. S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS and THE MITRE CORPORATION 
 
 The privacy mandate^ Planning for action, A symposium/ 
 
 workshop. April 2, 3, and 4. 
 
 MITRE/National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 1975. 
 
2. 1-10 
 
 USPRICH, S. T. 
 
 The theory and practice of self- regulation. A study by the 
 Privacy and Computer Task Force. Department of 
 Communications/Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
 WALSH, T. J. 
 
 Background information use limited by new law. 
 Industrial Security, April 1971, 4-12. 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 £§22J£^s A computers and the rights of citizens. P-5077. 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1973. 
 
 WARE, W. H. , Chairman 
 
 Records^ computers and the rights of citizens. 
 
 Report of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated 
 
 Data Systems. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1973. 
 
 WARE, W. H 
 
 Privacy.! the private sector and sgciety^s needs, P-5414. 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1975. 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 Privacy issues and the private sector. P 5685. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Sajita Monica, California, 1976. 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 State of the Privacy Actj_ an overview of technological and 
 
 social science developments. P-5756. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1976. 
 
 WEINBERG, R. D. 
 
 Confidential and other privileged commu nica tion. 
 Oceana Publications, Dobbs Ferry, New York, 1967. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. 
 
 Science, privacy, and freedom: issues and proposals for the 
 1970*3. Part II - Balancing the conflicting demands of 
 privacy, disclosure and surveillance. 
 Columbia Law Review, Vol. 66, 1966, 120 5-12 53. 
 
2. 1-1 1 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. 
 
 Science, privacy, and freedom: issues and proposals for the 
 
 1970's. Part I - The current impact of surveillance on 
 
 privacy. 
 
 Columbia Law Review, Vol. 66, 1966, 1005-1050. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. 
 
 Erivaci and fr eedo m. 
 Atheneum, New York, 1967. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. 
 
 New laws will protect your privacy. 
 Think, Vol. 35, May-June 1969, 27-31 
 
 WESTIN, A. F., Ed. 
 
 iRi. P.£li|tion technology iH §. democracy. 
 
 Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971 
 
 WHEELER, S., Ed. 
 
 On record.:, files and dossiers in American life. 
 Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1969. 
 
 WHITESIDE, T. 
 
 A reporter at large: anything adverse? 
 The New Yorker, April 21, 1975, 45-101. 
 
 YOUNGER, K. , Chairman 
 
 Report of the Committee on Privacy., Cmdn. 5012 
 Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1972. 
 
 ZELERMYER, W. 
 
 Invasion of privacy. 
 
 Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York, 1959 
 
2. 2-1 
 
 2. 2 Administrative Records 
 
 BAUDOT, J. I., CARROLL, J. M., KIRSH, C. , and WILLIAMS, J. I. 
 
 P§£Sonal recordsj. ££ocedures x practices and problems. A 
 study by the Privacy and Computers Task Force, Department of 
 Communications/Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, 1973. 
 
 GREEN, R. A. 
 
 The confidentiality of income tax returns. 
 
 Canadian Tax Journal, Vol. 20, No. 6, 1972, 56 8-596. 
 
 KARST, K. L. 
 
 The files: legal controls over the accuracy of stored 
 
 personal data. 
 
 i^w and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 31, 1966, 342-76. 
 
 NEIER, A. 
 
 Dossier,: the secret files they kee_p on y_ou. 
 Stein & Day, New York, 1975. 
 
 S. CONGRESS. HOUSE. 
 
 Committee on Government Operations. Special Subcommitttee on 
 Invasion of Privacy. 
 
 Commercial credit bureaus.. Hearings before the Special 
 Subcommittee. 90th Cong., 2nd sess. , March, 1968. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1968. 
 
 WAGNER, S. 
 
 Records and the invasion of privacy. 
 
 Social Science Journal, Vol. 1, 1965, 1082-1085, 
 
 WARNER, S. 
 
 Records and the invasion of privacy. 
 Social Science Journal, 1965, 1082-1085 
 
 WHEELER, S., Ed. 
 
 On record^ fiJL§§ &Q& dossiers in American life 
 Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1969. 
 
2.3-1 
 
 2.3 Statistics 
 
 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROBLEMS OF CENSUS ENUMERATION 
 Americans uncounted people. 
 National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C. , 1972. 
 
 AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION 
 
 Census programs attacked as invasions of privacy. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1968, 12-13. 
 
 CHAMBERS, S. P. 
 
 Statistics and intellectual integrity. 
 
 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Vol. 
 
 128, 1965, 1-16. 
 
 DUNN, E. S., Jr. 
 
 Social information processing and statistical systems - 
 
 change an d reform. 
 
 John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974. 
 
 GELLMAN, H. S. 
 
 Statistical data banks and their effects on pr iv acy. A study 
 by the Privacy and Computers Task Force. Department of 
 Communications/Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
 GOLDBERG, E. M. 
 
 Urban information systems and invasions of privacy. 
 Urban Affairs Quarterly, Vol. 5, No.. 3, 1970, 249-264. 
 
 GOLDBERG, E. M. 
 
 Privacy problems in municipal information sy_s terns. 
 Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, California, 1972. 
 
 HIRSCH, P. 
 
 The punchcard snoopers. 
 
 The Nation, October 16, 1967, 369-372. 
 
2.3-2 
 
 MARTIN, M. E. 
 
 Statisticians, confidentiality, and privacy. 
 
 American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 67, 1977, 165-167. 
 
 PAFSONS, C. W., Ed. 
 
 Americans uncounted people. Report of the Advisory Committee 
 
 on Problems of Census Enumeration. 
 
 National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C, 1972. 
 
 ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY 
 
 Evidence from the Royal Statistical Society to the Data 
 Protection Committee. 
 
 Journal of the Ro^al Statistic al Society, Ser. A, Vol. 140, 
 1977, 210-216. 
 
 SCHWARTZ, A. 
 
 Interviewing and the public. 
 
 Public Opinion Quarterly., Vol. 28, No. 1, 1964, 135-142, 
 
 U. K. HOME OFFICE. 
 
 Security^ of the census of population. Presented to 
 Parliament by the Secretary of State for Social Services and 
 the Secretary of State for Scotland. Cmnd. 5365. 
 Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1973. 
 
 U. S. CONGRESS. SENATE. 
 
 Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Constitutional 
 
 Rights. 
 
 Privacy / the census^, and federal g ue s t ion na ires, Hearings 
 
 before the Subcommittee on S. 1791. 91st Cong., 1st sess. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1970. 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 ivacy_ aspects of health statistics. P-5619. 
 
 and Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1976 
 
2.4-1 
 
 2.4 Computers and Data Banks 
 
 AHL, D. H. 
 
 Survey of public attitudes toward computers in society. 
 
 AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Vol. 45 National Computer 
 
 Conference. 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, New Jersey, 1976. 
 
 ANDERSON, R. E. 
 
 Sociological analysis of public attitudes toward computers 
 
 and information files. 
 
 AZIPS Conference Proceedings , Vol. 40, Spring Joint Computer 
 
 Conference 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, New Jersey, 1972, 649-657. 
 
 ARMER, P. 
 
 Privacy, aspects of the cashless and checkless society,. 
 Testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on Administrative 
 Practice and Procedure. P-3822. 
 The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1968. 
 
 ARMER, P. 
 
 The individual: his privacy, self image, and obsolescence. 
 In: U. S. CONGRESS. HOUSE. Committee on Science and 
 Aeronautics: The management of information and knowledge, 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1970. 
 Also in: Computers and P eop le, June 1975, 18 - 23. 
 
 ARMER, P., 
 
 Computer technology and surveillance. 
 Computers and People, Sept., 197 5, 8 - 11. 
 
 ARMER, P. 
 
 Social im£lications of the computer utility. P-3642. 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1977. 
 
 ARONOFF, S. 
 
 1984 — Only 11 years away. 
 
 State Government, Vol. 46, No. 2, 1973, 66-75. 
 
2.4-2 
 
 ASSOCIATION OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMERS AND ANALYSTS, 
 
 The data bank and your privacy: the ACPA's position. 
 
 ACPAi. The Newsletter of the Association of Computer 
 
 ££23£3:i!l™§£S and Analysts, Sept. -Oct. 1972, 3-6. 
 
 ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY 
 
 Committee on Computers and Public Policy. 
 
 A problem-list of issues concerning computers and public 
 
 policy: report of the committee. 
 
 Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 
 
 Vol. 17, 1974, 495-503. 
 
 ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY, LOS ANGELES CHAPTER 
 Ombudsman Committee. 
 
 Privacy in Information Systemsj_ Phase I Report. 
 Association for Computing Machinery, Los Angeles, 1974, 
 
 ASSOCIATION OF DATA PROCESSING SERVICE ORG ANIZ A1IONS , INC. 
 ADAPSO's position paper on privacy problems. 
 News Release 
 New York, Oct. 21, 1970. 
 
 BACHI, R., and EARON, R. 
 
 Confidentiality problems related to data-banks. 
 
 Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute. Vol. 
 
 43, Book 1, 1969, 225-241. 
 
 BIGELOW, R. P. 
 
 Legal and security issues posed by computer utilities. 
 Harvard Business Review, Vol. 45, Sept.- Oct. 1967, 150-161 
 
 BRICTSON, R. C. 
 
 Some thoughts on the social implications of computers and 
 
 privacy. SP-295 3. 
 
 System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 
 
 1967. 
 
 CANADA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS. 
 
 Conference on computers: privacy and freedom of information. 
 May 21-24, 1970 at Queen's University. Telecommunication 
 Study No. 56. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, 1971. 
 
2.4-3 
 
 CANADA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 
 
 RnLl&£l £JQil computers. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, 1972. 
 
 CANADA. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 
 Right of Privacy. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, 1975. 
 
 CHARTRAND, R. L. 
 
 The federal data center: proposals and reactions. 
 Law and Computer Technology, Oct., 1968, 12-19. 
 
 COLUMBIA HUMAN RIGHTS LAW REVIEW, Eds. 
 
 Surveillance^ dataveillance and personal freedoms^ use and 
 
 §kuse_ of info rm ation technology. 
 
 International Scholarly Book Service, Forest Grove, Oregon, 
 
 1973. 
 
 COMMITTEE ON PRESERVATION AND USE OF ECONOMIC DATA 
 
 £§£5Ii of the committee on the preservation and use of 
 economic data to the Social Science Research Council. 
 Social Science Research Council, New York, 1965. 
 Also in: U.S. CONGRESS. HOUSE: Committee on Government 
 Operations, Special Subcommittee on Invasion of Privacy: The 
 Computer and the invasion of privacy. Hearings before the 
 Special Subcommittee. 89th Congress, 1st session, June and 
 September 1965, and 2nd session, May 1966. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1966. 
 
 CONFERENCE BOARD 
 
 Information technology Initiatives for today. - decision 
 
 that cannot wait. 
 
 The Conference Board, New York, 1972. 
 
 CONFERENCE BOARD 
 
 Information technology. Some critical implications for 
 
 decision makers. 
 
 The Conference Board, New York, 1972. 
 
 COUNTRYMAN, V. 
 
 The diminishing right of privacy: the personal dossier and 
 
 the computer. 
 
 Texas Law Review, Vol. 49, 1971, 837-971. 
 
2.4-4 
 
 COUNTRYMAN, V. 
 
 Computers and dossiers, 
 
 Computers and Automation, Jan. 1972, 13-19, 42; Feb. 1972, 
 
 14-20, 36.. 
 
 DAVIDSON, T. A. 
 
 Computer information privacy. 
 
 The Office, Vol. 70, No. 2, 1969, 10-17. 
 
 DEUDNEY, S. J. 
 
 The data bank society: control of computers will not in 
 
 itself guarantee privacy. 
 
 Canadian Chartered Accountant, Vol. 9 8, 1971, 175-179. 
 
 DOUGLAS, W- 0. 
 
 The computerization of government files: what impact on the 
 
 individual? 
 
 UCLA Law Review, Vol. 15, 1968, 1371-1498. 
 
 DUNN, E. S. , Jr. 
 
 R eview of proposals f or a national data center. 
 
 Statistical Evaluation Report No. 6, Bureau of the Budget, 
 
 Washington, D. C. , 1965, 
 
 Also published as Appendix 2, Hearings of the subcommittee 
 
 of the Committee on Government Operations, House of 
 
 Representatives, 89th Congress, 2nd Session, July 26, 27, 
 
 28, 1966, entitled The Computer and the Invasion of Privacy. 
 
 DUNN, E. S. Jr. 
 
 The idea of a national data center and the issue of personal 
 
 privacy. 
 
 The Am eric an Statistician, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1967, 21-27. 
 
 DUNN, E. S. Jr. 
 
 The information utility and the idea of the public data 
 
 bank. 
 
 In: SACKMAN, H. , and NIE, N., Eds., The information utility. 
 
 and s ocia l choice. 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, N. J., 1970. 
 
2.4-5 
 
 FELLEGI, I. P. and GOLDBERG, S. A. 
 
 Some aspects of the impact of the computer on official 
 
 statistics. 
 
 Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, Vol. 
 
 43, No. 1, 1969, 157-175. 
 
 GALLAGHER C. E., Chairman 
 
 The computer and the invasion of Hrivac^. 
 
 Arno Press, New York, 1967. 
 
 Also: Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1966. 
 
 GELLMAN, H. S. 
 
 Statistical data banks and their effects on .privacy. A study 
 by the Privacy and Computers Task Force. Department of 
 Communications/Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
 GLASER, E. , ROSENBLATT, D. , and WOOD, M. K. 
 
 The design of a federal statistical data center. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1967, 12-20. 
 
 GOTLIEB, C. C. and BORODIN, A. 
 
 Social issues in computing. 
 Academic Press, New York, 1973. 
 
 GREENBERGER, M., Ed. 
 
 Computers, communications., and the p_ublic interest. 
 The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Md. , 1971. 
 
 GRENIER, E. J. 
 
 Computers and privacy: a proposal for self-regulation. 
 Duke Law Journal, No. 3, 1970, 49 5-513. 
 
 HARVARD LAW REVIEW 
 
 Privacy and efficient government: proposals for a national 
 
 data center 
 
 Harvard Law Review, Vol. 82, December 1968, 400-417. 
 
 HIRSCH, P. 
 
 The world's biggest data bank. 
 Datamation, Vol. 16, May 1970, 66-73. 
 
2.4-6 
 
 IBM CORPORATION 
 
 Privacy: a special report. 
 
 Think, Vol. 35, May-June, 1969, 12-32. 
 
 JORDAN, F. J. E. 
 
 Privac^j. computer data banks^ communications and the 
 constitution. A study by the Privacy and Computer Task 
 Force. Department of Communications/Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, 1973. 
 
 KATZ, K. 
 
 JR§3ii!.§tion of federal data banks, A study by the Privacy and 
 Computer Task Force, Department of Communications/Department 
 of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
 KAYSEN, C. 
 
 Data banks and dossiers. 
 
 The Public Interest, No. 7, Spring 1967, 52-60. 
 
 KAYSEN, C. , Chairman 
 
 Report of the task force on the storage of and access to 
 
 government statistics. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1969, 11-19. 
 
 LAND, F. 
 
 The integrity of statistical data bases. 
 
 In: OECD: Policy issues in data protection and privacy. 
 Concepts and perspectives. Proceedings of the OECD seminar, 
 24th to 26th June, 1974. OECD Information Studies, 
 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 
 Paris, 1976. 
 
 LEVIN, E. 
 
 The future shock of information networks. 
 
 Astronautics and Aeronautics, Vol. 11, Nov. 1973, 52-57, 
 
 MARON, M. E. 
 
 Computers and our future , P-3501. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1966. 
 
2.4-7 
 
 MARTIN, J. , and NORMAN, A. R. D. 
 The computerized society. 
 Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1970, 
 
 MELDMAN, J. A. 
 
 Centralized information systems and the legal right to 
 
 privacy. 
 
 Mar£uettte Law Review, Vol. 52, 1969, 335-54. 
 
 MICHAEL, D. N. 
 
 Speculations on the relations of the computer to individual 
 
 freedom and the right to privacy. 
 
 George Washington Law Review, Vol. 33, Oct. 1964, 270-286. 
 
 MILLER, A.R. 
 
 The national data center and personal privacy. 
 The Atlantic, Nov. 1967, 53-57. 
 
 MILLER, A.R. 
 
 Personal privacy in the computer age: the challenge of a new 
 technology in an information-oriented society. 
 MichigLan Law Review, Vol. 67, 1969, 1091-1246. 
 
 MILLER, A.R. 
 
 The assault on privacy - computers^ data banks and dossiers. 
 University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1971. 
 
 MILLER, R. I., 
 
 Invasion of privacy by computer. 
 
 Lex et Scientia, Vol. 5, 1968, 18-24. 
 
 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 
 
 Symposium: computers, data bank, and individual privacy. 
 Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 53, Dec. 1968, 211-245. 
 
 MOORE, G. B. , KUHNS, J. L., TREFFTZS, J. L. and MONTGOMERY, C. A, 
 Acce ss ing individual records from personal data files usin< 
 non-unique identifiers. NBS Special Publication 500-2. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1977. 
 
2.4-8 
 
 MORRIS, G. 
 
 The computer data bank-privacy controversy revisited: an 
 analysis and an administrative proposal. 
 
 The Catholic University of Am eric a Law Review , Vol. 22, 
 1973, 628-650. 
 
 MOWSHOWITZ, A. 
 
 The. conquest of will. Inf or ma tipn processing in human 
 
 affairs . 
 
 Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts, 
 
 1976. 
 
 MULLER, P. J. and KUHLMANN, H. H. 
 
 Integrated information bank systems, social book-keeping and 
 
 privacy. 
 
 International Social Science Journal, UNESCO, Vol. 24, 1972, 
 
 584-602. 
 
 MURRAY, J. A. Ed. 
 
 Inf oUS^iioH ££ocessing and the ri^ht to privacyj. a 
 
 crossroads decision for North Americans. 
 
 Proceedings of the 14th Annual University of Windsor Seminar 
 
 on Canadian-American Relations. 
 
 University of Windsor Press, Windsor, Ontario, 1973. 
 
 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STATE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 
 
 Information systems technology in state governments 1973. 
 
 NASIS Report. 
 
 Council of State Governments, Lexington, Kentucky, 1974. 
 
 OETTINGER, A. G. 
 
 Run, computer, run. 
 
 Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1969. 
 
 ORWELL, G. 
 
 Nineteen eight^four x a novel. 
 
 Seeker and Warburg, London, 1949 
 
 Also: New American Library, New York, 1950 
 
 PACKARD, V. 
 
 The naked society.. 
 
 David McKay Co., New York 1964. 
 
2.4-9 
 
 PACKARD, V. 
 
 Don't tell it to the computer. 
 
 The New York Times Magazine, Jan. 8, 1967, 44. 
 
 PARKER, D. B. 
 
 Crime by. computer. 
 
 Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1976 
 
 PARKER, D. B., NYCUM, S. , and OURA, S. S. 
 Computer abuse. 
 Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California, 1973. 
 
 PRISENDORF, A. 
 
 The computer vs. the Bill of Rights. 
 The Nation, Oct. 31, 1966, 449-452. 
 
 RALSTON, A. G. 
 
 Computers and democracy. 
 
 Computers and Automation, Vol. 22, April 1973, 19-22, 40 
 
 RANABARGER, J. K. 
 
 Computers: another challenge to privacy. Dissertation. 
 School of Law, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 1968. 
 
 ROSANDER, A. C. 
 
 Analysis of the Kaysen Committee report. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1970, 20-25. 
 
 ROSENBLATT, D. , GLASER, E. , and WOOD, M. K. 
 
 Principles of design and appraisal of statistical infor- 
 mation systems, 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1970, 10-15. 
 
 ROTHMAN, S. 
 
 Protecting privacy: pros and cons. 
 
 In: BISCO, R. L. , Ed. Data bas es, computers and the social 
 
 sciences. 
 
 Whiley-Interscience, New York, 1970, 255-260. 
 
2.4-10 
 
 RULE, J. B. 
 
 Private lives and public surveillance^ social control in the 
 
 computer ac[e. 
 
 Schocken Books, Inc., New York, 1974. 
 
 SACKMAN, H. 
 
 Computers and social choice. Report P-4915. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1972. 
 
 SAMUELSON, E. 
 
 Statlicje data banker 03 personlighetsyern (Public data banks 
 and the pri vacy problem) . 
 Universitetsf^rlaget , Oslo, 1972. 
 
 SCHULTZE, C. L. 
 
 A data system for measuring and analyzing public programs: 
 detailed specification of the powers, functions and 
 responsibilities of a federal data center might satisfy 
 Congressional doubts about invasion of privacy. 
 Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 93, March 1970, 13-15. 
 
 SELMER, K. S., Ed. 
 
 Data banks and society. Proceedings of the First 
 International Oslo Symposium on Data Banks and So ci ety. 
 Universitetsforlaget , Oslo-Bergen-Tromsj*, 1972. 
 
 SIEGHART, P. 
 
 Privacy and computers. 
 Latimer Press, London, 1976. 
 
 STERLING, T. D. 
 
 Humanizing computerized information systems 
 Science, Vol. 190, 1975, 1168-1172. 
 
 STONE, M. G. and WARNER M. 
 
 Politics, privacy, and computers. 
 
 Political Quarterly, Vol. 40, 1969, 2 56-267. 
 
 UCLA LAW REVIEW. 
 
 The computerization of government files: what impact on the 
 
 individual? 
 
 UCLA Law Review, Vol. 15, 1968, 1371-1498. 
 
2.4-11 
 
 K. HOME OFFICE. 
 
 Computers and privacy. Command Paper Cmnd. 6353 
 Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1975. 
 
 K. HOUSE OF COMMONS. 
 
 Data surveillance. Parliamentary Debates, Commons, Vol. 783, 
 6 May 1969, Col. 285-288. 
 
 U. K. HOUSE OF LORDS 
 
 Computers and personal records. Parliamentary Debates, 
 Lords, Vol. 306, 1969, Cols. 103-177. 
 
 UNITED NATIONS. COMMISSION ON HUMAN FIGHTS 
 
 Human rights and scientific and technological developments^. 
 
 Uses of electronics which ma_y affect the rights of the 
 
 person and the limits which should be placed on such uses in 
 
 a democratic society 
 
 Report of the Secretary-General, E/CN. 4/1142, 31 January 
 
 1974; E/CN. 4/1 1 42/Add1 . , 9 January 1974; E/CN. 4/1 1 42/Add2. , 
 
 7 October 1974. 
 
 United Nations, New York, 1974. 
 
 U.S. CONGRESS. HOUSE. 
 
 The computer and invasions of privacy. 
 
 Arno Press, New York, 1967. 
 
 Also: Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1966. 
 
 U. S. CONGRESS. HOUSE. 
 
 Committee on Government Operations. Special Subcommittee on 
 Invasion of Privacy. 
 
 The computer and the invasion of .privacy, Hearings before 
 the special subcommittee. 89th Congress, 2nd sess. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1966. 
 
 U. S. CONGRESS. HOUSE. 
 
 Committee on Government Operations. 
 
 Privacy and the national data bank concept, 35th Report by 
 
 the Committee. House report No. 1842. 90th Cong., 2nd 
 
 sess. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1968. 
 
2. 4-12 
 
 S. CONGRESS. SENATE. 
 
 Committee \on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Administrative 
 
 Practice and Procedure. 
 
 Government dossier^ survey of information contained in 
 
 government f iles x committee print. 90th Cong. , 1st sess. , 
 
 November, 1 967. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1967. 
 
 U. S. CONGRESS. SENATE. 
 
 Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Administrative 
 
 Practice and Procedure. 
 
 Computer Eriyacyj. hearings before the subcommittee. 90th 
 
 Cong., 1st sess., March, 1967, and Part 2, 90th Cong., 2nd 
 
 sess., February, 1968. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1967 and 
 
 1968. 
 
 U. S. CONGRESS. SENATE. 
 
 Committee on Government Operations, Ad Hoc Subcommittee on 
 Privacy and Information Systems and Committee on the 
 Judiciary. Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights. 
 P^ivacy^ The collection^ use £ and computerization of 
 Person al data 
 
 Joint Hearings, 93d Congress, 2d session, on S. 3418, S. 
 3633, S. 3116, S. 2810, S. 2542. Parts 1 and 2. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1974. 
 
 U. S. CONGRESS. SENATE. 
 
 Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Constitutional 
 
 Rights. 
 
 Federal data banks and constitutional rights : a study of 
 
 data systems on individuals maintained by agencies of the 
 
 United States Government. Volume 6 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1974. 
 
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE 
 
 Records^ computers and the rights of cit ize ns. Report of the 
 
 Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data 
 
 Systems 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1973. 
 
 USPRICH, S. T. 
 
 The theory and p_ra.ct.ice of self -regulation. A study by the 
 Privacy and Computer Task Force. Department of 
 Communications/Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
2.4-13 
 
 VAN DER NOOT, T. J. 
 
 The computers, social science statisticians and the A.S.A, 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 22, 1968, 20-22. 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 Testimony before the assembly statewide information policy_ 
 
 committee. P-4214. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1969. 
 
 WARE, H. H. 
 
 Computers in societv.J.s future. P-46 84. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1971 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 S§co£^§x computers and the rights of citizens. P-5077 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1973. 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 Computers and societal the technological setting. P-50 94. 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1973. 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 Data banks^ privacy and society- P-5131. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1973. 
 
 WARE, W. H. , Chairman 
 
 E§22£^§ x computers and the rights of citizens. 
 
 Report of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated 
 
 Data Systems. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1973. 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 Public p_olicv. aspects of an information age. P-57 84. 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1977. 
 
 WARNER, M., and STONE, M. 
 
 Xk§ il^ta bank societal organizations^ computers^, and social 
 
 freedom . 
 
 Unwin Brothers Limited, London, England, 1970. 
 
2. 4-14 
 
 WESSEL, M. R. 
 
 Z£®6domJ_s ed_gej_ the computer threat to soci ety. 
 Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1974. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. 
 
 Legal safeguards to insure privacy in a computer society. 
 Communications of the ACM, Vol. 10, Sept. 1967, 533-537. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. 
 
 Computers and the protection of privacy. 
 Technology. Review, Vol. 71, April 1969, 32-37. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. 
 
 Civil liberties and computerized data systems. 
 
 In: GREENBERGER, MARTIN, Ed., Computers, communications and 
 
 the public interest. 
 
 Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1970. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. 
 
 Legal safeguards to insure privacy in a computer society. 
 
 In: PYLYSKYN, Z. W. , Ed. , Perspectives on the computer 
 
 £$. vo 1 u i io n . 
 
 Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1970. 
 
 Also in: Communications of the ACM, Vol. 10, Sept. 1967, 
 
 553-537. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F-, Ed. 
 
 Inf 2£S.^tion technology, in a democracy.. 
 
 Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. and BAKER, M. A. 
 
 Databanks in a free society.^, computers^ record- keeping and 
 
 p_r i y acy . 
 
 Quadrangle Books, New York, 1972. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. 
 
 The problem of privacy and security with computerized data 
 
 collection. 
 
 Conference Board Record, Vol. 11, March 1974, 31-34. 
 
2.4-15 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. et al. 
 
 l§£0£i 2l the £roject on com£uter data banks. 
 
 National Academy of Science. Quadrangle Press, New York, 
 
 1974. 
 
 WILLIS, D. S. 
 
 Who knows you: a look at commercial data banks. 
 Com2uters and Automation, Vol. 22, March 1973, 18-21. 
 
 ZASTROW, C. 
 
 The status of community wide social data banks. 
 Welfare in Review, Vol. 10, March-April 1972, 32-36. 
 
 ZWICK, C. J. 
 
 A national data center. 
 
 A presentation before the American Bar Association, 
 
 Honolulu, Hawaii, August 8, 1967. 
 
2. 5-1 
 
 2. 5 Other References 
 
 DALFEN, C. 
 
 International factors. A study by the Privacy and Computers 
 
 Task Force. Department of Communications/Department of 
 
 Justice, 
 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
3-1 
 
 Part One: Statistical Information Systems 
 3. RESPONDENT REACTION TO SURVEYS 
 
 ANDERSON, R. E. 
 
 Sociological analysis of public attitudes toward computers 
 
 and information files. 
 
 AFIPS Conference Proceedings/ Vol. 40, Spring Joint Computer 
 
 Conference 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, New Jersey, 1972, 649-657. 
 
 ANDERSON, W. and SHERR, S. 
 
 Confidentiality expectations of college students: revisited. 
 Journal of College Student Personnel, Vol. 10, 1969, 
 264-269. 
 
 ARNOLD, R. G. 
 
 The interview in jeopardy: a problem in public relations. 
 Public Opinion .Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1964, 119-123. 
 
 BRADBURN, N. M. 
 
 Selecting the guestions to be asked, 
 
 E£22eed i ngs of the Social Statistics Sect ion - 1969, 
 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D.C., 1969, 
 
 178-181. 
 
 DIVORSKI, S. W., GORDON, A. C. , and HEINZ, J. P. 
 
 Public access to government information: a field experiment. 
 Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 68, 1973, 240-279. 
 
 DOHRENWEND, B. S., and DOHRENWEND, B. P. 
 Sources of refusals in surveys. 
 Public Opinion 0.uarterly, Vol. 32, 1968, 74-83. 
 
 FORM, W. H. 
 
 Field problems in comparative research: the politics of 
 
 distrust. 
 
 In: ARMER, M, and GRIMSHAW, A. D. , Eds., Comparative social 
 
 .research^ methodological p robl ems and strategies. 
 
 Wiley, New York, 1973, 83-113. 
 
3-2 
 
 G0LDFI5LD, E.D., TURNER, A. G. , COWAN, CD., and SCOTT, J.C. 
 
 Privacy and confidentiality as factors in survey response. 
 
 To appear in: Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section - 
 
 1977. 
 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D.C., 1978. 
 
 SCHWARTZ, A. 
 
 Interviewing and the public. 
 Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 28, 
 
 No, 
 
 1, 1964, 135-142. 
 
 SJOBERG, G. 
 
 A guestionnaire on guestionnaires. 
 
 Public Opinion Quarterly, Winter 19 54-55, 423-427. 
 
 SWEDEN. NATIONAL CENTRAL BUREAU OF STATISCIS. 
 
 The National Central Bureau of Statistics and the general 
 EMblic^. The findings of an interview survey taken in Sweden 
 lUEiHil the Spring of 1976. 
 National Central Bureau of Statistics, Stockholm, 1 977. 
 
 YOUNGER, K., Chairman 
 
 l§£2£i of the Commi tt ee on Privacy, Cmdn. 5012 
 Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1972. 
 
4-1 
 
 4. THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY VS. THE NEED TC KNOW 
 
 AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION 
 
 Report. Ad Hoc Committee on Privacy and Confidentiality. 
 
 Mim. 
 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D. C. , 1976. 
 
 BARABBA, V. P. 
 
 The right of privacy and the need to know. 
 
 In: U. S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS: A numerator and denominator 
 
 for me asuring change. Technical Paper No. 37. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. 1975. 
 
 BARABBA, V.P. and KAPLAN, D. L. 
 
 U.S. Census Bureau statistical technigues to prevent 
 disclosure—the right to privacy vs. the need to know. 
 Paper presented at the 2nd session of the International 
 Association of Survey Statisticians, Warsaw, 1975./ 
 
 BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES SURVEY COMMITTEE 
 
 The potentials of large-scale social research. 
 
 Ch. 7 in: The behavioral and social sciences :_ outlook and 
 
 needs. 
 
 Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1969. 
 
 BRYANT, E. C. and HANSEN, M. H. 
 
 Invasion of privacy and surveys: a growing dilemma. 
 In: SINAIKO, H. W. and BROEDLING, L. A., Eds., Perspectives 
 on attitude assessment^ surveys and their alternatives^ 
 Manpower Research and Advisory Services, Smithsonian 
 Institution, Washington, D. C. , 1975. 
 
 DALENIUS, T. 
 
 The invasion of privacy problem and statistics production - 
 an overview. 
 
 Statistisk Tidskrift, National Central Bureau of Statistics, 
 Stockholm, 1974, 2*13-225. 
 
 DOMESTIC COUNCIL. COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHT OF PRIVACY 
 National Information Policy,. 
 
 National Commission on Libraries and Information Science and 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1976. 
 
4-2 
 
 DONNISON, D. , Chairman 
 
 Surv ey , research and privacy. Report of a working party. 
 Social and Community Planning Research, London, 1973. 
 
 DUNCAN, J. W. 
 
 Confidentiality and the future of the U. S. statistical 
 
 system. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1976, 54-59. 
 
 DUNN, E. S., Jr. 
 
 Social information .processing^ and statistical systems - 
 change and reform- 
 John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974. 
 
 HEARLE, E. F. R. 
 
 Measurements and privacy in urban information systems. ACM 
 25th National Conference, New York, September 1970. 
 
 JUSTER, F. T. 
 
 Microdata requirements and public policy designs. 
 
 lHH^ls of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 1, 1972, 
 
 7-16. 
 
 LAPRADE, B. M. 
 
 Development of demographic and social statistics and the 
 protection of privacy. 
 
 Paper read at General Conference of IVSSP, August-September 
 1973 in Liege, Belgium, Original in French, Translation in 
 English prepared at U. S. Census Bureau, October 1973. 
 
 LINEHAN, T. P. 
 
 Problems of confidentiality with particular reference to 
 
 population censuses. 
 
 Statistical Reporter, Statistical Policy Division, Office 
 
 of Management and Budget, Washington, D. C. , August 1972, 
 
 17-21. 
 
 LINEHAN, T. P. 
 
 Problems of confidentiality with particular reference to 
 population censuses. 
 
 Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, Vol. 
 45, No. 3, 1973, 214-227. 
 
4-3 
 
 MARTIN, M. E. 
 
 Statisticians, confidentiality, and privacy. 
 
 American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 67, 1977, 165-167. 
 
 MINDLIN, A. 
 
 Confidentiality and local data systems. 
 
 In: U.S. Bureau of the Census: Census Tract Papers. Series 
 
 GE-40, No. 4. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1968, 15-24. 
 
 MINDLIN, A. 
 
 Confidentiality and local information systems. 
 Public Administration Review, Vol. 28, 1968, 509-518. 
 
 MOORE, A. L. 
 
 Statistics and the problem of privacy. 
 
 In: WALLIS, W. A., Chairman, Federal statistics. Report of 
 
 the President's Commission. Vol II 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1971, 
 
 335-366. 
 
 PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON FEDERAL STATISTICS 
 Federal statistics . 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, 1971. 2 vols. 
 
 ROSANDER, A. C. 
 
 Analysis of the Kaysen Committee report. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1970, 20-25. 
 
 TAEUBER, R. C. 
 
 Problems of access: some comments. 
 
 Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 2, 1973, 215 
 
 - 220. 
 
 WALLIS, W. A., Chairman 
 
 Federal statistics, Report of the President's Commission. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1971. 2 vols. 
 
5. 1- 1 
 
 5. LEGISLATION, STATUTES, AND REGULATIONS 
 5. 1 United States 
 
 BEANEY, W. M. 
 
 The constitutional right to privacy in the Supreme Court, 
 In: KURLAND, P., Ed. , The Supreme Court Review, 
 Chicago, 1962. 
 
 BEANEY, W. M. 
 
 The right to privacy and American law. 
 
 Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 31, 1966, 253-71. 
 
 BEANEY, W. M. , 
 
 The Griswold case and the expanding right to privacy. 
 Wisconsin Law Review, 1966, 979-995. 
 
 BUSHKIN, A. A., and SCHAEN, S. I. 
 
 The Privacy Act of 197 4^ A reference manual for compliance, 
 System Development Corporation, McLean, Virginia, 1976. 
 
 CORCORAN, T. E. 
 
 On the confidential status of census reports. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1963, 33-40. 
 
 DAVIS, R. C. 
 
 Confidentiality and the census, 1790-1929. 
 
 In: WARE, W. H., Chairman, Records^ computers and the rights 
 
 of citizens. 
 
 Report of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated 
 
 Data Systems. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1973. 
 
 DECENNIAL CENSUS REVIEW COMMITTEE 
 Privacy and confidentiality. 
 
 In: DECENNIAL CENSUS REVIEW COMMITTEE, The Decennial Census 
 ~ Import to the Secretary of Commerce. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1971. 
 
5. 1-2 
 
 DUNCAN, J. W. 
 
 The impact of privacy legislation on the federal statistical 
 
 system. 
 
 Review of Public Data Use, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1975, 51-53- 
 
 DUNCAN, J. W. 
 
 Confidentiality and the future of the U. S. statistical 
 
 system. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1976, 54-59. 
 
 DUNCAN, J. W. 
 
 Federal statistics - recent legislation and activities 
 
 affecting confidentiality. An overview of selected 
 
 activities. 
 
 In: Proceedingg of the Wp.1rk.sh02 on Privacy and 
 
 Confidentiality, March 3-5, 1976, Atlanta, Georgia. 
 
 Cooperative Health Statistics System and National Center for 
 
 Health Statistics, Washington, D. C. , 1976, 39-49. 
 
 ECKLER, A. R„ 
 
 The Census Bureau and the public. 
 
 In: ECKLER, A. R. , The Bureau of the Census. 
 
 Praeger Publishers, New York, 1972. 
 
 GOLDFIELD, E. D. 
 
 Preservation of confidential source records. 
 
 In: FISHBEIN, M. H. , Ed. , The national archives and 
 
 statistical research. 
 
 Ohio University Press, Athens, Ohio, 1973. 
 
 HAGAN, R. L., and CLEMENCE, T. G. 
 The benevolent recordkeepers. 
 
 Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section - 1975. 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D. C. , 1976, 
 214-216. 
 
 HULETT, D. T. 
 
 Confidentiality of statistical and research data and the 
 Privacy Act of 1974. 
 
 Statistical Reporter, Office of Management and Budget, 
 Washington, D. C. , 1975, 197-209. 
 
5. 1-3 
 
 JABINE, T. B. 
 
 The impact of new legislation on statistical and research 
 
 uses of SSA data. 
 
 Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section - 1975. 
 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D. C. , 1976, 
 
 221-230. 
 
 MARTIN, M. E. 
 
 Statistical legislation and confidentiality issues. 
 International Statistical Review, Vol. 42, No. 3, 1974, 
 
 265-281. 
 
 MINDLIN, A. 
 
 Confidentiality and local data systems. 
 
 In: U.So Bureau of the Census: Census Tr act Papers. Series 
 
 GE-40, No. 4. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. 1968, 15-24. 
 
 MINDLIN, A. 
 
 Confidentiality and local information systems. 
 Public Administration Review, Vol. 28, 1968, 509-51 
 
 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STATE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 
 
 lUf 2££^ii2ii §istems technology in state governments 1973 
 
 NASIS Report. 
 
 Council of State Governments, Lexington, Kentucky, 1974. 
 
 OCEANA EDITORIAL BOARD 
 
 Privacy - its lecjal protection. 
 
 Oceana Publications, Dobbs Ferry, New York, 1976 
 
 PODGERS, Q. 
 
 Toward a national information policy. 
 
 Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 
 
 Vol. 2, No. 6, 1976, 13-15. 
 
 ROSENFELD, F. A. 
 
 The Freedom of Information Act's privacy exemption and the 
 Privacy Act of 1974. 
 
 HiHyaird Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, Vol. 11, 
 1976, 596-631. 
 
5. 1-4 
 
 SHATTUCK, J. H. F. 
 
 Bights of privacy. 
 
 National Textbook Company, Skokie, Illinois, 1977. 
 
 STALLINGS, W. 
 
 A confidentiality and p ub lic access policy for local 
 g ov ernment. Prepared for the Charlotte Integrated Municipal 
 Information System Project. 
 
 University of North Carolina, Department of City and 
 Regional Planning, Chapel Hill, N. C. , 1972. 
 
 STALLINGS, C. W. 
 
 Local information policy: confidentiality and public access. 
 Public Administration Pgview, Vol. 34, May- June 1974, 
 197-204. 
 
 U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL. 
 
 Confidentiality of ^ voluntary" reports under the census 
 laws. Opinion of the Attorney General of the United States, 
 Byron R. White, Acting Attorney General. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1962. 
 
 S. BUREAU OF THE BUDGET 
 
 Export 2^ the Task Force on the sto rage of and access to 
 
 3°.Ze]IIL]!ient. statistics. 
 
 Bureau of the Budget, Washington, D. C. , 1966. 
 
 S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS 
 
 Bureau of the Census guide to programs and publications: 
 
 subjects and areas. 
 
 Government Printing office, Washington, D.C., 1973. 
 
 U. S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS 
 
 Census confidentiality: how it grew. 
 
 Government Printing office, Washington, D. C, 1969, 
 
 S. BUREAU OF MINES 
 
 Confidentiality of information. Policy statement. 
 Federal Register, Vol. 41, No. 231, Nov. 30, 1976, 52546, 
 
5. 1-5 
 
 U. S. CODE 
 
 The Federal Reports Act. 
 
 Public Law 90-620, October 22, 1968. 44 U.S.C. 421. 
 
 U. S. CODE 
 
 Privacy Act of 1974. 
 
 Public Law 93-579, December 31, 1974. 5 U.S-C. 
 
 - 552a 
 
 U. S. CODE 
 
 The Freedom of Information Act. 
 
 Public Law 93-502, November 21, 1974. 5 U.S.C. 552 
 
 U. S. CODE 
 
 Government in the Sunshine Act. 
 
 Public Law 94-409, September 13, 1976. 5 D.S.C. 552b 
 
 U. S. CODE 
 
 Tax Reform Act of 1976. 
 
 Public Law 94-455. October 4, 1976. U.S.C. 
 
 S. CONGRESS. HOUSE. 
 
 An act to amend Title 13, United States Code, to assure 
 confidentiality of information furnished in response to 
 questionnaires, inquiries, and other requests of the Bureau 
 of the Census, and for other purposes. Report 12884, 91st 
 Conq. , 1st Sess. 
 Government Printinq Office, Washinqton, D. C, 1969. 
 
 CONGRESS. SENATE. 
 Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Constitutional 
 Riqhts. 
 
 £E.i.Y.aci.£. the census , and federal questionnaires, Hearinqs 
 before the Subcommittee on S. 1791. 91st Conq., 1st sess. 
 Government Printinq Office, Washington, D. C. , 1970. 
 
 U. S. CONGRESS. SENATE. 
 
 Committee on Government Operations. 
 
 P.E°tectinq individual privacy in F ede ral gathering , use and 
 disclosure of information, Senate Report No. 93-1183, 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1974. 
 
5. 1-6 
 
 0. S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
 
 Industrial security manual for saf ecjuar ding classified 
 
 information , DOD 5220. 
 
 Department of Defense, Washington, D. C, 1966. 
 
 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE 
 
 Protection of the individual as a research subject - g_rants x 
 
 awards, contr ac ts. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, May, 1969. 
 
 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE 
 Privacy rights of parents and students. 
 
 Federal Register, Vol. 40, No. 3, January 6, 19 75, Part 
 III, 1208-1216. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1975. 
 
 U. S. DEPARTMENT CF THE TREASURY 
 
 Privacy; Act of J974. Document 6372(11-75). 
 Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D.C. , 1975. 
 
 S. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET 
 
 Confidentiality of statistical information. 
 
 In: Statistical Services of the United States Government, 
 
 Revised Edition. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1975, 25-27. 
 
 U. S. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, STATISTICAL POLICY 
 DIVISION 
 
 Confidentiality of statistical and research data. 
 
 Statistical Reporter, Office of Management and Budget, 
 
 Washington, D.C, 1977, 115-136. 
 
 U. S. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET 
 
 Privacy Act implementation. Guidelines and responsibilities 
 Federal Register, Part III, Vol 40, No. 132, Wednesday, July 
 9, 1975, 28948-28978. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, 1975. 
 
 U. S. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET 
 
 Responsibilities for the the maintenance of records about 
 
 individuals by federal agencies. 
 
 Federal Register, Part III, Vol. 40, No. 132, July 9, 1975, 
 
 28948-28949. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, 1975. 
 
5.1-7 
 
 U. S. PRESIDENT 
 
 Z^^^^^i Ejsrsonal data systems subject to the Privacy Act of 
 .1974. First annual report of the President for calendar 
 year 1975. (2 vols.) 
 U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1976. 
 
 U. S. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND 
 STATISTICS 
 
 Guidelines for preventing disclosure in tabulations of 
 
 program data. Mim. 
 
 Social Security Administration, Washington, D.C., 1977. 
 
 WALLIS, W. A., Chairman 
 
 Federal statistics. Report of the President's Commission. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1971. 2 vols. 
 
 YATES, P. B. 
 
 Implications of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts 
 for voluntary labor statistics programs. 
 Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section - 1975. 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D.C, 1976, 
 217-220. 
 
5.2-1 
 
 5. 2 Canada 
 
 CANADA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. 
 Protection of privacy. 
 
 ££2£§^iH3§« 53rd Annual Meeting of Commissioners on 
 Uniformity of Legislation in Canada, Appendix I, 1971, 
 260-408. 
 
 CANADA. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND COMMERCE 
 
 Report of Departmental Commission on the Official Statistics 
 of Canada with Appendix Consisting of NLATES OF Evidence, 
 Ottawa: King's Printer, 1913. 
 
 CANADA. PARLIAMENT, HOUSE OF COMMONS 
 
 An act to amend the Statistics Act, C-271, 13th Sess 
 20, 1974. 
 
 CANADA. STATISTICS ACT 
 R.S., C. 257, s. 1 
 Queen's Printer for Canada, Ottawa, 1970. 
 
 CORNFIELD, D. A. 
 
 The right to privacy in Canada. 
 
 University of Toronto Faculty of Law Revi ew , Vol. 25, 1967, 
 
 103-12 0. 
 
 KATZ, K. 
 
 Regulation of federal data banks, A study by the Privacy and 
 Computer Task Force, Department of Communications/Department 
 of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
 MARTIN, M. E. 
 
 Statistical legislation and confidentiality issues. 
 International Statistical Review, Vol. 42, No. 3, 1974, 
 265-281. 
 
 SHARP, J. M. 
 
 E§aulatory models. A study by the Privacy and Computer Task 
 Force. Department of Communications/Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa. Undated. 
 
5.2-2 
 
 WILLIAMS, J. S. 
 
 L&2.&1. ££2tection Sit. privacy. A study by the Privacy and 
 Computers Task Force. Department of Communications/ 
 Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
5.3-1 
 
 5. 3 United Kingdom 
 
 DOUGLAS, A. S. 
 
 The U. K. privacy white paper 1975. 
 
 AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Vol. 45, National Computer 
 
 Conference 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, New Jersey, 1976. 
 
 FESSEY, M. C. and BROWNING, H. E. 
 
 Confidentiality of business statistics. 
 
 Statistical News, Central Statistical Office, London, No. 
 
 10, 1970, 10.1 - 10.6. 
 
 ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY 
 
 Evidence from the Royal Statistical Society to the Data 
 Protection Committee. 
 
 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society., Ser. A, Vol. 140, 
 1977, 210-216. 
 
 U.K. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, STATISTICS BRANCH 
 Code of practice - confidentiality of information. 
 Department of Education and Science, 1974. 
 
 U. K. HOUSE OF COMMONS 
 
 Right of privacy bill. Parliamentary Debates, Commons, Vol, 
 229, Col. 607-662. 
 
 U. K. HOUSE OF LORDS 
 
 Right of privacy bill. Parliamentary Debates, Lords, Vol, 
 232, 15 June 1961, Col. 289-299. 
 
5.4-1 
 
 5. 4 West Germany 
 
 BIRKELBACH, D. W. 
 
 Das hessische Modell des Datenschutzes : Erfahrungen aus 
 
 dreijahriger Praxis. 2 Parts. 
 
 IBM Nachrichten, Vol. 24, 1974, 248-254, 338-343. 
 
 DAMMANN, U. 
 
 Das Bundesdatenschutzgesetz. Eine Matrix-darstellung des 
 
 Regierungsentwurts. 
 
 Of f entliche Ver wait unci und Datenverarbei tun q, Vol. 1, 1974. 
 
 HESSISCHER LANDTAG 
 
 Dritter Tatigkeitsbericht des Hessischen Datenschutz- 
 
 Verlag Dr. H. Heger, Bad Godesberg, West-Germany, 1974. 
 
 HONDIUS, F. W. 
 
 lE££2ii!3 data protection in Europe. 
 
 North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1975 
 
 KRAUSE, H. D. 
 
 Right to privacy in Germany: pointers for American 
 
 legislation. 
 
 Duk_e_ Law Journal, Summer, 1965, 481-530. 
 
5.5-1 
 
 5. 5 Sweden 
 
 HELLNER, J. 
 
 Datenschutz in Schweden. 
 
 In: REICHEFT-FACILIDES, F. , RITTNER, F., and SASSE, J., 
 
 Eds. , Festschrift fur Reimer Schmidt. 
 
 Verlag Versicherungswirtschaf t E. V. , Karlsruhe, Germany, 
 
 1976, 265-283. 
 
 HONDIUS, F. W. 
 
 Emerging data protection in Europe. 
 
 North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1975, 
 
 SWEDEN. RIKSDAGEN 
 
 Datalagen (The Swedish Data Act) . 
 
 Svensk F^rf attningssamlina 1973:289, Stockholm, 1973, 
 
 VINGE, P. G. 
 
 Swedish data act. 
 
 Sveriges Industrif prbund (The 
 
 Industries) , Stockholm, 1974. 
 
 Federation 
 
 of Swedish 
 
 VINGE, P. G. (assisted by J. FREESE) 
 
 ^2^.LL^H£^§. oJ the^ Swedish data act. 
 
 Sveriges Industrifjtfrbund (The Federation 
 
 Industries) , Stockholm, 1975. 
 
 of Swedish 
 
5.6-1 
 
 5. 6 Other Countries 
 
 CORTES, I. P. 
 
 The constitutional foundations of privacy. 
 University of the Philippines Law Center, 
 Philippines, 1970. 
 
 Quezon City, 
 
 HONDIUS, F. W. 
 
 Einerc[inc[ data protection in Europe. 
 
 North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1975. 
 
6-1 
 
 6. ENDS AND MEANS OF PRIVACY PROTECTION IN STATISTICAL 
 INFORMATION SYSTEMS - OVERVIEWS 
 
 DALENIUS, T. 
 
 The invasion of privacy problem and statistics production - 
 an overview. 
 
 Statistisk Tidskrift, National Central Bureau of Statistics, 
 Stockholm, 1974, 213-225. 
 
 DALENIUS, T. 
 
 Confidentiality in surveys. A research program. 
 
 In: EHSANES SALEH, A. K. Md. Ed. Proceeding of the §_y_mp_osium 
 
 on statistics and related topics, October 24-26, 1974, 
 
 Carleton University, Ottawa. 
 
 Carleton Mathematical Lectures Notes No. 12, 1975, 
 
 2.01-2.36. 
 
 DALENIUS, T. 
 
 Confidentiality in surveys. A research program. Report No. 1 
 of the research project Confidentiality in Surveys, 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, Sweden, 1975. 
 
 FREEMAN, W. W. K. 
 
 Training of statisticians in diplomacy to maintain their 
 
 integrity. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 17, No. 5, 1963, 16-20. 
 
 IBM SWEDEN 
 
 User techniques to p_r event the invasion of privacy- 
 International Symposium, October 2-3, 1973. 
 IBM Sweden, Stockholm, 1973. 
 
 LINEHAN, T. P. 
 
 Problems of confidentiality with particular reference to 
 
 population censuses. 
 
 Statistical Reporter, Statistical Policy Division, Office 
 
 of Management and Budget, Washington, D. C. , August 1972, 
 
 17-21. 
 
6-2 
 
 LINEHAN, T. P. 
 
 Problems of confidentiality with particular reference to 
 population censuses. 
 
 Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, Vol. 
 45, No. 3, 1973, 214-227. 
 
 ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY 
 
 Evidence from the Royal Statistical Society to the Data 
 Protection Committee. 
 
 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. A, Vol. 140, 
 1977, 210-216. 
 
 WALLIS, W. A., Chairman 
 
 Inderal statistics , Report of the President's Commission. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1971. 2 vols. 
 
 WARE, W. H. , and CALDWELL, J. C. 
 
 Confidentiality, privacy and sensitivity in household 
 
 surveys. 
 
 The Australian Journal of Statistics, Vol. 14, 1972, 
 
 197-203. 
 
7. 1-1 
 
 7. ETHICAL STANDARDS AND RELATED TOPICS 
 7. 1 Standards for Statisticians 
 
 AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION 
 
 Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Statistical Standards. 
 The American Statistician* Vol. 8, No. 3, 1954, 19-23. 
 
 AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION 
 
 Opinions on statistical standards. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 8, No. 5, 1954, inside front 
 
 cover and 22. 
 
 AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION 
 
 Report of the Ad Hoc Committee to Explore Opinion on 
 
 Standards. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1956, 13 and 16. 
 
 AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION 
 
 A study of future <joals of ASA. A report of the Board of 
 
 Directors of the American Statistical Association, July 
 
 1971. 
 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D.C., 1971. 
 
 AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION. 
 
 M<LLntaijiin£ the JE£2f§ssional integrity of federal 
 S ta tistics. A Report of the American Statistical 
 Association Federal Statistics Users Conference Committee on 
 the Integrity of Federal Statistics. 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1973, 58-67. 
 
 BANCROFT, T. A. 
 
 The statistical community and the protection of privacy. 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1972, 13-16. 
 
 BROWN, T. H. with discussion by W. W. K. Freeman 
 The statistician and his conscience. 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1952, 14-20. 
 
7. 1-2 
 
 BURGESS, R. W. 
 
 Do we need a bureau of standards for statistics? 
 Journal 2l Marketing, Vol. 11, 1947, 281-282. 
 
 COURT, A. H. with discussion by J. E. Morton 
 Statistical standards. 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1952, 6-7 
 
 DEMING, W. E. 
 
 Principles of professional statistical practice. 
 
 Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 36, 19 65, 1883-1900. 
 
 DUNCAN, J. W., Chairman, 
 
 Hain£3.iJlil!3. tJl£ Etofessional inte_grit2 of federal 
 statistics. A report of the American Statistical 
 Association - Federal Statistics Users' Conference Committee 
 on the integrity of federal statistics. 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1973, 58-67. 
 
 FEUILLIAN, J., Esq. 
 
 Every man's evidence versus a testimonial privilege for 
 
 survey researchers. 
 
 Public O pi nion Quarterly, Spring 1976, 3 9-50. 
 
 statistician's respon- 
 
 FRANKEL, L. R. 
 
 Statistics and peo.ple. The 
 
 sibilities. 
 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 71, 
 
 1976, 9-16. 
 
 FREEMAN, W. W. K. 
 
 Training of statisticians in diplomacy to maintain their 
 
 integrity. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 17, No. 5, 1963, 16-20. 
 
 GAINSBRUGH, M. , Chairman 
 
 Standards of statistical conduct in business and government, 
 
 Papers from a session sponsored by the Business and Economic 
 
 Statistics Section at ASA Annual Meeting in Boston, December 
 
 1951. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1952, 6-20. 
 
7. 1-3 
 
 GIBSON, J. D. 
 
 A question of ethics. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1973, 72-76, 
 
 HANSEN, M. H., with discussion by C. D. Long 
 Statistical standards and the census. 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1952, 7-1 
 
 RIVLIN, A. M. and TIMPANE, P. M. , Eds. 
 
 Ethical and legal issues of social experimentation. 
 
 Studies in social experimentation, No. 4. 
 
 Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1975- 
 
 STALLINGS, W. 
 
 h. confidenti al ity and Public access p_olicy_ for local 
 government. Prepared for the Charlotte Integrated Municipal 
 Information System Project. 
 
 University of North Carolina, Department of City and 
 Regional Planning, Chapel Hill, N. C, 1972. 
 
 STALLINGS, C. W. 
 
 Local information policy: confidentiality and public access. 
 Public Administration Review, Vol. 34, May- June 1974, 
 197-204. 
 
 NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS 
 Policy. statement on release of data for individual 
 elementary units and related matters, DHEW Publication No. 
 (HSM) 73-1212. 
 
 Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, 
 D.C., 1972. 
 
7.2-1 
 
 7. 2 Standards for Other Professionals 
 
 AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION 
 
 Principles of professional responsibility. 
 
 American Anthropological Association, Washington, D. C. , May 
 
 1971. 
 
 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH 
 Code of professional ethics and practices. 
 
 American Association for Public Opinion Research, New York, 
 1970. 
 
 AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION 
 
 Statement on confidentiality of student records. 
 American Council on Education, Washington, D. C. , 1968. 
 
 AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION 
 
 Research Advisory Committee for Study of Campus Unrest. 
 
 Statement on confidentiality, use of results, and 
 
 independence. 
 
 Science, Vol. 185, 1969, 158-159. 
 
 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION 
 
 Ethical standards of psychologists, 
 American Ps_ycho logist x Vol. 18, 1963, 5 6-60. 
 
 AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION 
 
 Ethical Principles in the conduct of research with human 
 
 E§l r t ic ip_a n t s . 
 
 American Psychological Association, Washington, D. C. , 1973. 
 
 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION 
 
 Toward a code of ethics for sociologists. 
 
 The American Sociologist, Vol. 3, 1968, 316-318. 
 
 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION 
 
 Report of the Committee on Information Technology and 
 
 Privacy. 
 
 The American Sociologist, Vol. 5, 1970, 409-4 11. 
 
7.2-2 
 
 ARNOLD, R. G. 
 
 The interview in jeopardy: a problem in public relations. 
 Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1964, 119-123. 
 
 ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY 
 
 Code for professional conduct in information processing. 
 Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery , 
 Vol. 11, 1968, 99. 
 
 BARBER, B. 
 
 The ethics of experimentation with human subjects. 
 Scientific American, Vol. 23 4, No. 2, 1976, 25-31. 
 
 BAXTER, R. 
 
 An inquiry into the misuse of the survey technique by sales 
 
 solicitors. 
 
 Public Op_inion Quarterly, vol. 28, No. 1, 1964, 124-134. 
 
 BAXTER, R. 
 
 The harassed respondent. Sales solicitation in the guise of 
 consumer research. 
 
 In: BOGART, L. Ed., Current controversies in marketinq 
 research, Markhara Publishing Co., Chicago, 1969. 
 
 BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES SURVEY COMMITTEE 
 Values, ethics, and privacy. 
 
 Ch. 8 in: The behavioral and social sciences^ outlook and 
 needs. 
 Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1969. 
 
 CONRAD, H. S. 
 
 Clearance of questionnaires with respect to "invasion of 
 privacy", public sensitivites, ethical standards, etc. 
 American Psychologist, Vol. 22, 1967, 356-359. 
 
 HOCH, E. L. 
 
 The privacy issue and a professional response at the 
 
 departmental level. 
 
 JourjiaJ. of Educational Measurement, (Supplement), Vol. 4, 
 
 No. 1, 1967, 17-22. 
 
7.2-3 
 
 KATZ, J. , Compiler 
 
 Ex£ crimen tat ion with human subjects^ the authority of the 
 investiq at or f subject^ professions , an d state in t he human 
 experimentation process. 
 Pussel Sage Foundation, New York, 1973. 
 
 McPHAIL, T. L. 
 
 Behavioral science research and the rights of human subject. 
 Can ad ian Review of Sociology and A n t h r op_o 1 ooj_ , Vol. 11, 
 1974, 255-261. 
 
 MEAD, M. 
 
 Research with human beings: a model derived from 
 anthropological field practice. 
 Daedalus, Vol. 98, 1969, 361-386. 
 
 NATIONAL ACCREDIATION COUNCIL FOR AGENCIES SERVING THE BLIND AND 
 VISUALLY HANDICAPPED 
 
 Standards for conf identiality. 
 
 National Accrediation Council for Agencies Serving the Blind 
 
 and Visually Handicapped, New York, 1972. 
 
 NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION 
 
 Code of ethics of the education profession. 
 
 National Educational Association, Washington, D. C. , 1968. 
 
 NEJELSKI, P., Ed. 
 
 Social research in conflict with law and ethics- 
 
 Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 
 
 1976. 
 
 OLAFSON, F., FERGUSON, A., JR., and PARKER, A. W. 
 
 Confidentiality^ sL .guide for neighborhood health centers. 
 Neighborhood Health Center Seminar Program Monograph Series 
 No. 1. 
 Pisani Printing Co., San Francisco, California, 1971. 
 
 PARKER, D. B. 
 
 The rules of ethics in information processing. 
 Communications of the American Council on Education, Vol. 
 11, No. 3, 1968, 198-201. 
 
7.2-4 
 
 REISS, A. J. Jr. 
 
 Selected issues in informed consent and confidentiality with 
 special reference to behavioral/social science 
 £§.s ea re h/in£ u ir x . Mim. report prepared for the National 
 Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of 
 Biomedical and Behavioral research. 
 Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 1976. 
 
 RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CAMPUS UNREST 
 
 Statement on confidentiality use of results, and 
 independence by the Advisory Committee on Campus Unrest. 
 Science, Vol. 165 No. 3889, 1969, 158-159. 
 
 RESNICK, J. H. and SCHWARTZ, T. 
 
 Ethical standards as an independent variable in 
 
 psychological research. 
 
 American Psv. c ho I03 i s t , Vol. 28, 1973, 134-139. 
 
 REYNOLDS, P. D. 
 
 On the protection of human subjects and social science. 
 International Social Science Journal, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1972, 
 693-719. 
 
 REYNOLDS, P. D. 
 
 Important considerations in developing a procedure for 
 
 control of research using human subjects. 
 
 The American Sociologist, Vol. 9, 1974, 221-225. 
 
 RIVLIN, A- M. and TIMPANE, P. M. , Eds. 
 
 Ethical and legal issues of social experimentation. 
 
 Studies in social experimentation, No. 4. 
 
 Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1975. 
 
 RUSSELL SAGE FOUNDATION. 
 
 Guidelines for the collection,, maintenance and dissemination 
 
 of pupil records. 
 
 Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1970. 
 
 RUSTEIN, D. D. 
 
 The ethical design of human experiments 
 Daedalus, Vol. 23, 1969, 523-541. 
 
7.2-5 
 
 SAWYER, J-, and SCHECTER, H. 
 
 Computers, privacy, and the National Data Center: the 
 
 responsibility of social scientists. 
 
 American Psychologist, Vol. 23, 1968, 810-818. 
 
 SJOBERG, G., Ed. 
 
 Ethics,, politics^ and social research. 
 Routtedge, London, 1969. 
 
 TRW CREDIT DATA 
 
 Code of ethics and operating principles of TRW credit data. 
 TRW Credit Data, Los Angeles, California, undated. 
 
 TYBOUT, A. M. and ZALTMAN, G. 
 
 Ethics in marketing research: their practical relevance. 
 Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 11, 1967, 357-368. 
 
 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE 
 
 P£oi®ction of the individual as a research subject - grants^ 
 
 awards^ contracts. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, May, 1969. 
 
 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE 
 Protection of human subjects. 
 
 Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 105, May 30, 1974, Part 
 11,18914-18920. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1974. 
 
 WEISS, C. H. 
 
 Ethical and political issues in social research. 
 The Social Welfare Forum, 1970, 76-87. 
 
7.3-1 
 
 7. 3 Related Topics 
 
 BRYMER, R. A., and FARRIS, B. 
 
 Ethical and political dilemmas in the investigation of 
 deviance: a study of juvenile delinquency. 
 
 In: SJOBERG, G. , Ed., EthJ.c_s x Politics, and Social Research, 
 Schenkman, Cambridge, 1967. 
 
 DICKSON, J. P., CASEY, M, , WYCKOFF, D. , and WYND, W. 
 Invisible coding of survey questionnaires. 
 
 Public Opinion Ojjarterly,, Spring 1977, 100-107. Discussion, 
 107-112. 
 
 FARMAKIDES, J. B. 
 
 The legal environment of the information scientist. 
 Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 
 Vol. 1, No. 10, 1975, 8-9. 
 
 HOFSTETTEP, C. R. 
 
 Salesman as survey researchers: a note on fraudulent 
 
 interviews. 
 
 Social Science Quarterly, vol. 52, 1971, 991-994. 
 
 WARWICK, D. P. 
 
 Social scientists ought to stop lying. 
 Psychology Today, February 1975, 38, 40, 105, 106 
 
1-1 
 
 8. KEY DESIGN ASPECTS 
 
 8. 1 Public vs. Personal Information 
 
 BING, J. 
 
 Classification of personal information with respect to 
 
 sensitivity aspect. 
 
 In: SELMER, K. S. , Ed. , Data banks and society.. Proceedings 
 
 of the First International Oslo Symposium on Data Banks and 
 
 Society. 
 
 Universitetsf^rlaget , Oslo-Bergen-Troms0, 1972. 
 
 CONRAD, H. S. 
 
 Clearance of questionnaires with respect to "invasion of 
 privacy", public sensitivites, ethical standards, etc. 
 Ame rica n Psychologist/ Vol. 22, 1967, 356-359. 
 
 GELLMAN, H. S. 
 
 Statistical data banks and their effects on privacy. A study 
 by the Privacy and Computers Task Force. Department of 
 Communications/Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
 GORDON, A. C, HEINZ, J. P., GORDON, M. C, and DIVORSKI, S. , 
 
 Public information and public access: a sociological 
 
 interpretation. 
 
 Northwestern University. Law Review, Vol. 68, 1973, 280-308. 
 
 TURN, R. 
 
 Classification of £§_£sonal information for privacy 
 
 protection purposes. P-5652. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1976. 
 
 Also in: AFIPS: Conference Proceedings, National Computer 
 
 Conference - 1976. 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, N. J. , 1976, 301-307. 
 
2-1 
 
 8.2 Identifiers; Anonymity; Confidentiality 
 
 ASH, P. and ABRAMSON, E. 
 
 Effect of anonymity in attitude opinion research. 
 
 JoU-EHal P.f Abnormal and Social Psychology/ Vol. 47, 1952, 
 
 722-723. 
 
 ASTIN, A. W. 
 
 Why we need your number. 
 
 Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American 
 
 Personnel and Guidance Association Detroit, 1968. 
 
 BENSON, L. E., 
 
 Studies in secret ballot technique. 
 
 Public Op_inion .Quarterly, Vol. 5, 1941, 79-82. 
 
 CHEESEMAN, E. A., and BUTLER, A. R. 
 
 £®£SOB§l ii^ntifjLcatioii on medical records with particular 
 
 reference to Northern Ireland. 
 
 Report No. RLU 4, Northern Ireland Medical Record Linkage 
 
 Research Unit 
 
 Queen's University, Eelfast, 1972. 
 
 COREY, S. M. 
 
 Signed versus unsigned questionnaires. 
 
 Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 28, 1937, 144-14; 
 
 FISHER, R. F. 
 
 Signed versus unsigned questionnaires. 
 
 Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 30, 1946, 220-225. 
 
 GERBERICH, J. B. , and MASON, J. M. 
 
 Signed versus unsigned questionnaires. 
 
 Journal 2JL Educational Research, Vol. 42, 1948, 122-126, 
 
 GOLDFIELD, E.D., TURNER, A.G., COWAN, CD., and SCOTT, J.C. 
 
 Privacy and confidentiality as factors in survey response. 
 
 To appear in: Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section 
 
 1977. 
 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D.C., 1978. 
 
2-2 
 
 HAFTNETT, R. T. and SELIGSOHN, H. C. 
 
 The effects of varying degrees of anonymity on responses to 
 
 different types of psychological guestions. 
 
 Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol. 4, 1967, 9 5-103. 
 
 HICKS, G.L. 
 
 Informant anonymity and scientific accuracy: the problem of 
 
 pseudonyms. 
 
 Human Or g_an i zat i on , 1977, 214-220. 
 
 HILMAR, N. A. 
 
 Anonymity, confidentiality, and invasions of privacy: 
 
 responsibility of the researcher. 
 
 American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 58, 1968, 324-330. 
 
 KERSHAW, D. N. , and SMALL, J. C. 
 
 Data confidentiality and privacy: lessons from the New 
 Jersey negative income tax experiment. 
 Public Policy, Vol. 20, 1972, 257-280. 
 
 KING, F. W. 
 
 Psychology in action: anonymous versus identifiable 
 guestionnaires in drug usage surveys. 
 American P s^c ho lo^i s t , Vol. 25, 1970, 982-985. 
 
 LUETGART, M. J. and ARMSTRONG, A. H. 
 
 Methodological issues in drug use surveys: anonymity, 
 
 recency, and freguency. 
 
 International Journal of Addiction, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1973, 
 
 683-689. 
 
 MANNICHE, E. and HAYES, D. P. 
 
 Respondent anonymity and data matching. 
 
 Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 21, 1957, 384-388. 
 
 MOORE, G. B. , KUHNS, J. L., TREFFTZS, J. L. and MONTGOMERY, C. A. 
 Accessing individual records from personal data files using_ 
 B2HzUD.i3.ue identifiers. NBS Special Publication 500-2. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1977. 
 
1.2-3 
 
 PEARLIN, L. I. 
 
 The appeals of anonymity in questionnaire response. 
 Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 25, 1961, 640-647. 
 
 PELZ, D. G. 
 
 The influence of anonymity on expressed attitudes. 
 Human Organization, Vol. 18, 1968, 88-91. 
 
 ROSEN, N. A. 
 
 Anonymity and attitude measurement. 
 
 Pub lic Opinion 0. ua r t e r ll , vol. 24, 1960, 675-679. 
 
 SELMER, E. S. 
 
 Registration numbers in Norway: some applied number theory 
 and psychology. 
 
 Journal of the Ro^al Statistical Society, Series A, Vol. 
 130, Part 2, 1967, 225-231. 
 
 STAFFORD, S. 
 
 Is the social security number being abused? 
 Government Executive, Vol. 4, No. 6, 1972, 62-63. 
 
 WILDMAN, R.C. 
 
 Effects of anonymity and social setting on survey research, 
 Public Opinion Quarterly, Spring 1977, 74-79. 
 
8.3-1 
 
 8.3 Records: Administrative vs. Statistical Uses 
 
 GELLMAN, H. S. 
 
 Statistical data banks and thei r effects on privacy. A study 
 by the Privacy and Computers Task Force. Department of 
 Communications/Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
 HANSEN, M. H. 
 
 The role and feasibility of a national data bank, based on 
 
 matched records and alternatives. 
 
 In: WALLIS, W.A., Chairman, Fede ral Statistics^ R§_P_ort of 
 
 the President's Commission, Vol. II, 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. 1971, 1-62. 
 
 STEINBERG, J., and COOPER, H. C. 
 
 Social security statistical data, social science research, 
 
 and confidentiality. 
 
 Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 30, Oct. 1967, 3-15. 
 
.4-1 
 
 I. 4 Record Linkage 
 
 BORUCH, R. F. 
 
 Record linkage in longitudinal and correlational research: 
 
 its justification and implications for individual privacy. 
 
 In: DALENIUS, T. and KLEVMARKEN, A., Personal integrity and 
 
 the need for data in the social sciences. Proceedings of a 
 
 symposium, March 15-17, 1976. 
 
 Swedish Council for Social Science Research, Stockholm, 
 
 1976. 
 
 DALENIUS, T. 
 
 Matching personal files - a threat to individual privacy? 
 
 Report No. 21 of the research project Confidentiality in 
 
 Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 
 Stockholm, 1977. 
 
 FELLEGI, I. P. and SUNTER, A. B. 
 A theory for record linkage. 
 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 64, 
 1969, 1133-1210. 
 
 HANSEN, M. H. 
 
 The role and feasibility of a national data bank, based on 
 
 matched records and alternatives. 
 
 In: WALLIS, W. A. , Chairman, Federal Statistics^ Rep_ort of 
 
 the President's Commission, Vol. II, 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. 1971, 1-62. 
 
 JANSON, C-G. 
 
 Longitudinal studies and their need for data. 
 
 In: DALENIUS, T. and KLEVMARKEN, A., Eds., Personal 
 
 integrity and the need for data in the social sciences 
 
 Proceedings of a symposium, March 15-17, 1976. 
 
 Swedish Council for Social Science Research, Stockholm, 
 
 1976. 
 
 NEWCOMBE, H. B. , KENNEDY, J. M. , AXFOPD, S. J., and JAMES, A. P. 
 Automatic linking of vital records. 
 Science, Vol. 130, 1959, 954-959. 
 
8-4-2 
 
 OKNER, B. A. 
 
 Constructing a new data base from existing microdata sets: 
 the 1966 merge file. 
 
 Anna ls of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 1 , 1972, 325 
 - 342. 
 
 STEINBERG, J. 
 
 Data-linkage problems and solutions. 
 
 In: BISCO, R. L., Ed., Data bases x computers and the social 
 
 sciences. 
 
 Wiley- Interscience, New York, 1970. 
 
 STEINBERG, J. 
 
 Some aspects of statistical data linkage for individuals. 
 In: BISCO, R. L. , Ed. , Data bases^ computers and the social 
 sciences . 
 Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1970. 
 
 STEINBERG, J. 
 
 Some observations on linkage of sur vey and administrative 
 record data. DHEW PUB. NO. (SSA) 74-11750. 
 
 Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D. 
 C, 1973. 
 
 STEINBERG, J., and PRITZKER, L. 
 
 Some experiences with and reflections on data linkages in 
 the United States. 
 
 lUil^iijn of the International Statistical Institute, Vol. 
 42, 1969, 786-805. 
 
 TEPPING, B. J. 
 
 A model for optimum linkage of records. 
 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 63, 
 
 1968, 1321-1332. 
 
 WAGNER, G. and NEWCOMBE, H. B. 
 
 Record linkage. Its methodology and application in medical 
 data processing. 
 
 Methods of Information in Medicine - Met hodik der 
 Information in der Meg_izin, V ol. 9, No. 2, 197 0, 121-138. 
 
9-1 
 
 9. PROTECTIVE TECHNIQUES - DATA COLLECTION: SAMPLING 
 
 DALENIUS, T. 
 
 The invasion of privacy problem and statistics production - 
 an overview. 
 
 Statistisk Tidskrift, National Central Bureau of Statistics, 
 Stockholm, 1974, 213-225. 
 
 DALENIUS, T. 
 
 P£2£ectinci confidentiality by_ means of weighing designs. 
 Report No. 77 of the research project Errors in Surveys. 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1974. 
 
 DALENIUS, T. 
 
 Matching personal files - a threat to individual privacy? 
 
 Report No. 21 of the research project Confidentiality in 
 
 Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 
 Stockholm, 1977. 
 
 ERIKSSON, S. 
 
 Some sampling theory, for surveys with randomized response 
 interviews. Report No. 8 of the research project 
 Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1976. 
 
 RAGHAVARAO, D. , and FEDERER, W. T. 
 
 App lic ation of BIB designs as an alternative to the 
 randomized response method in survey^ sampling. Mim. report 
 Biometrics Unit, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 1973. 
 
10. 1-1 
 
 10. PROTECTIVE TECHNIQUES - DATA COLLECTION 
 10. 1 Randomized Response 
 
 ABERNATHY, J. R., GREENBERG, B. G. , and HORVITZ, D. G. 
 
 Estimates of induced abortion in urban North Carolina 
 Demography, Vol- 7, 1970 , 19-29. 
 
 ABUL-ELA, A.-L.A. 
 
 Randomized response models for sample surveys on human 
 
 populations. Ph.D. Dissertation. 
 
 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1966. 
 
 ABUL-ELA, A. L. A., GREENBERG, B. G. , and HORVITZ, D. G. 
 A multi-proportions randomized response model. 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 62, 
 1967, 990-1006. 
 
 ANDERSON, H. 
 
 Efficiency versus protection in randomized response designs. 
 Ph.D. Dissertation. 
 
 Department of Mathematical Statistics, University of Lund, 
 Lund, Sweden, 1975. 
 
 ANDERSON, H. 
 
 Estimation of a proportion through randomized response. 
 International Statistical Review, Vol. 44, 1976, 213-217. 
 
 EARKSDALE, W. B. 
 
 New randomized response techniques for control of 
 non-sampling errors in surveys, Ph.D. Dissertation 
 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1971. 
 
 BARKSDALE, W.B. 
 
 New randomized response techniques for control of 
 
 nonsampling errors in surveys. 
 
 Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section - 19 75. 
 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D. C. , 1976, 
 
 302-304. 
 
10. 1-2 
 
 BERMAN, J. , McCOMBS, H. , and BORUCH, R. 
 
 Notes on the contamination method. Two small experiments in 
 assuring confidentiality of responses. 
 Sociological Methods Research, No. 1, 1977, 45-6 2. 
 
 BLOMQVIST, N. and ERIKSSON, S. , 
 
 A 2®Ii®£^i t heor y of randomized interviews, Him. report. 
 Department of Statistics, University of Goteborg, Goteborg, 
 Sweden, 1974. 
 
 BOURKE, P. D. 
 
 MJ^l£i-£ro2ortions randomized response using the unrelated 
 Hue_s_t: ion t ec h nig ue . 
 
 Report No. 74 of the research project Errors in Surveys, 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1974. 
 
 BOURKE, P.. D. 
 
 Symmetry of response in randomized response designs. 
 Report No. 75 of the research project Errors in Surveys, 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1974. 
 
 BOURKE, P. D. 
 
 Vector response in randomized response designs. 
 Report No. 76 of the research project Errors in Surveys, 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1974. 
 
 BOURKE, P. D., 
 
 Randomized response designs for multivariate estimation. 
 
 Report No. 6 of the research project Confidentiality in 
 
 Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 
 Stockholm, 1975. 
 
 BOURKE, P. D. 
 
 The generation of randomized response designs for 
 multivariate estimation using design matr ices. Report No. 
 16 of the research project Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1976. 
 
10. 1-3 
 
 BOURKE, P.D. and DALENIUS, T. 
 
 Multi-^ proportions randomized response using a single sample. 
 Report No. 68 of the research project Errors in Surveys. 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1973. 
 
 BOURKE, P. D. and DALENIUS, T. 
 
 lan^25Li2®^ £§S£onse models with lying- Report. No. 71 of the 
 research project Errors in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1974. 
 
 BOURKE, P. D., and DALENIUS, T. , 
 
 A note 2H inadmissible estimates in randomized inquiries. 
 Report No. 72 of the research project Errors in Surveys. 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1974. 
 
 BOURKE, P. D. and DALENIUS, T. 
 
 Some new ideas in the realm of randomized inquiries. 
 
 Report Nr. 5 of the research project Confidentiality in 
 
 Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 
 Stockholm, 1975. 
 
 "bstract in: International Statistical Review, Vol. 44, 
 
 .J76, 219-221. 
 
 BP'DBURN, N. M. 
 
 Selecting the guestions to be asked, 
 
 Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section - 19 69, 
 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D. C. 
 
 178-181. 
 
 1969, 
 
 CAMPBELL, C. and JOINER, B. L. 
 
 How to get the answer without being sure you've asked the 
 
 guestion. 
 
 The American Statistician, Vol. 27, No. 5, 1973, 229-231. 
 
 CHI, I. C, CHOW, L. P. and RIDER, R. V. 
 
 The randomized response technigue as used in the Taiwan 
 
 outcome of pregnancy study. 
 
 Studies in Family. Planning, Vol. 3, 1972, 265-269. 
 
10. 1-4 
 
 CHOW L. P. and LIU, P. T. 
 
 Jk H^w randomized response technique: the multiple answer 
 model, Mini, report. 
 
 Department of Population Dynamics, School of Hygiene and 
 Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 
 Maryland, 1973. 
 
 CHOW, L. P., LIU, P. T. , and MOSLEY, W. H. , 
 
 New randomized response technique for study of contemporary 
 social problems. 
 
 Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Public 
 Health Association, Statistics Section, San Francisco, 
 November 4-8, 1973. 
 
 CHOW, L. P. and EIDER, R. V. 
 
 Epidemiology of outcomes of pregnancies in diverse cultures 
 and in selected countries. 
 
 Report prepared for U.S. Agency for International 
 Development, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns 
 Hopkins University, 1972. 
 
 DALENIUS, T. and VITALE, R. A. 
 
 h H^w randomized response design for estimating^ the mean of 
 § distribution. Report No. 78 of the research project 
 Errors in Surveys 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1974. 
 
 DeLACY, P. W. 
 
 Randomized conditional response. M.S. Dissertation. 
 Biometrics Unit, Cornell University, 1975. 
 
 DEWS, R. M. 
 
 Guttman scaling randomized responses^ a technique for 
 evaluating the underlying structures of behaviors to which 
 people may not wish to admit, Mim. report. 
 Oregon Research Institute, University of Oregon, 1974. 
 
 DOWLING, T. A- and SHACHTMAN, R. 
 
 On the relative efficiency of randomized response models. 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 70, 
 1975, 84-87. 
 
10. 1-5 
 
 DRANE, W. 
 
 Randomized response to more than one question. 
 Prj^ceedinqs of the Social Statistics Section - 197 5 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D. C. , 1976, 
 395-397. 
 
 DRANE, W. 
 
 On the theory of randomized responses to two sensitive 
 
 questions. 
 
 Communications in Statistics, 1976, 565-574. 
 
 ERIKSSON, S. 
 
 A new model for randomized response. 
 
 International Statistical Review, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1973, 
 
 101-113. 
 
 ERIKSSON, S. 
 
 Randomized interviews for sensitive questions , Ph.D. 
 
 Dissertation. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of G^teborg, G^teborg, 
 
 Sweden, 1973. 
 
 ERIKSSON, S. 
 
 Some sampling theory for surveys with randomized response 
 interviews. Report No. 8 of the research project 
 Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1976. 
 
 ERIKSSON, S. 
 
 Regression analysis of data from randomized interviews. 
 
 Report No. 17 of the research project Confidentiality in 
 
 Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 
 Stockholm, 1976. 
 
 ERIKSSON, S. 
 
 Applications of the randomized response technique. 
 
 In: DALENIUS, T. and KIEVMARKEN, A., Eds., Personal 
 
 inteqr ity and the need for data in the social sciences 
 
 Proceedings of a symposium, March 15-17, 1976. 
 
 Swedish Council for Social Science Research, Stockholm, 
 
 1976. 
 
10. 1-6 
 
 FOLSOM, R. E., GREENBERG, B. G. , HORVITZ, D. G. , and ABERNATHY, 
 J. R. 
 
 The two alternate questions randomized response model for 
 
 human surveys. 
 
 JoU-EH^l of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 68, 
 
 1973, 525-530. 
 
 GOODSTADT, M. S. and GRUSON, V. 
 
 The randomized response technique: a test on drug use. 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 70, 
 1975, 814-818. 
 
 GOULD, A. L., SHAH, B. V., and ABERNATHY, J. R. 
 
 Unrelated question randomized response techniques with two 
 
 trials per respondent. 
 
 Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section - 19 69. 
 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D. C. , 1969, 
 
 351-359. 
 
 GPEENBERG, B. G., ABERNATHY, J. R., and HORVITZ, D. G. 
 
 Application of the randomized response technique in 
 
 obtaining quantitative data. 
 
 Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section - 19 69. 
 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D. C. , 1969, 
 
 40-43. 
 
 GREENBERG, B. G. , ABERNATHY, J. R. and HORVITZ, D. G. 
 
 A new survey technique and its application in the field of 
 
 public health. 
 
 Mil bank Memorial Fund Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 4, 1970, 
 
 39-55. 
 
 GREENBERG, B. G. , ABUL-ELA, A.-L. A., SIMMONS, W. R., and 
 HORVITZ, D. G. 
 
 The unrelated question randomized response model theoretical 
 
 framework. 
 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 64, 
 
 1969, 520-539. 
 
 GREENBERG, B. G. , HORVITZ, D. G. and ABERNATHY, J. R. 
 A comparison of randomized response designs. 
 
 In: PROSCHAN, F. and SERFLING, R. J., Eds., Reliability, and 
 Biom et ry: Statistical Analysis of Lifelencjth. 
 SIAM, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1970, 787-815. 
 
10. 1-7 
 
 GREENBERG, B. G., KUEBLER, Jr. R. R. , ABERNATHY, J. R. , and 
 HORVITZ, D. G. 
 
 Application of the randomized response technique in 
 
 obtaining quantitative data. 
 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 66, 
 
 1971, 243-250. 
 
 GREENBERG, B. G., KUEBLER, R. R. , ABERNATHY, J. R., and HORVITZ, 
 D. G. 
 
 Respondent jeoparty and choice of the unrelated question in 
 
 randomized response. 
 
 Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 1, 1976, 
 
 92-103. 
 
 HOCHBERG, Y. 
 
 Two stage randomized response schemes for estimating a 
 multinomial, Mint, report. 
 
 Highway Safety Research Center, University of North 
 Carolina, Chapel Hill, N. C. , 1975. 
 
 HOCHBERG, Y. 
 
 Two stage randomized response schemes for estimating a 
 
 multinomial. 
 
 Communications in Statistics, Vol. 4, 1975, 1021-1032. 
 
 HORVITZ, D.G. 
 
 Rillliloillized response^ a technique for protecting privacy. 
 Paper read at the International Symposium on User Techniques 
 to Prevent the Invasion of Privacy, October 2-3, 1973. 
 IBM Sweden, Stockholm, 1973. 
 
 HORVITZ, D. G., GREENBERG, B. G., and ABERNATHY, J.R., 
 
 Recent developments in randomized response designs. 
 
 In: SRIVASTAVA, J. N. , Ed., A survey of statistical design 
 
 illlil linear models. 
 
 North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1975. 
 
 HORVITZ, D. G., GREENBERG, B. G., and ABERNATHY, J. R. 
 The randomized response technique. 
 
 In: SINAIKO, H. W. and BROEDLING, L. A., Eds., Perspectives 
 °H attitude assessment^ surveys and their alternatives. 
 Manpower Research and Advisory Services, Smithsonian 
 Institution, Washington, D. C. , 1975. 
 
10. 1- 
 
 HORVITZ, D. G., GREENBERG, B. G., and ABERNATHY, J. E. , 
 
 Randomized response: a data gathering device for sensitive 
 
 questions. 
 
 International Statistical Review, Vol. 44, 1976, 181-196. 
 
 HORVITZ, D. G. , SHAH, B. V. and SIMMONS, W. R 
 
 The unrelated question randomized response model. 
 E£2£g§<Iilli3§ 2.f the Social Statistics Section - 1967. 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D. C. , undated, 
 65-72. 
 
 LANKE, J. 
 
 On the choice of the unrelated question in Simmons' version 
 of randomized response. Report no. 52 of the research 
 project Errors in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockh , n, 
 Stockholm, 1972. 
 
 LANKE, J. 
 
 Qn the degree of protection in randomized inter vie _. 
 
 Report No. 2 of the research project Confidentiality in 
 
 Surveys, 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 
 Stockholm, 1975. 
 
 LANKE, J. 
 
 On t he choice of the unrelated question in Simmons^ version 
 of randomized response. 
 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 70, 
 1975, 80-83. 
 
 LANKE, J. 
 
 Randomized response. 
 
 In: DALENIUS, T. and KLEVMARKEN, A., Eds., Personal 
 
 integrity and the need for data in the social sciences 
 
 Proceedings of a symposium, March 15-17, 1976. 
 
 Swedish Council for Social Science Research, Stockholm, 
 
 1976. 
 
 LANKE, J. 
 
 On the degree of protection in randomized interviews, 
 international Statistical Review, Vol. 44, 1976, 197-203, 
 
10. 1-9 
 
 LAVIN, P. 
 
 k necessary and sufficient condition for asymptotic masking 
 of the Warner MLE estimate. Report no. 79 of the research 
 project Errors in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1974. 
 
 LEVY, K. J. 
 
 The randomized response technique and large sample pairwise 
 
 comparisons among the parameters of K independent binomial 
 
 populations. 
 
 The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical 
 
 Psychology, Vol. 29, 1976, 257-262. 
 
 LEVY, K. J. 
 
 Reducing the occurence of omitted or untruthful responses 
 when testing hypotheses concerning proportions. 
 Psycho logical Bulletin, Vol. 83, 1976, 759-761. 
 
 LEVY, K. J. 
 
 The randomized response technique and large sample 
 
 comparisons among the parameters of K independent binomial 
 
 populations. 
 
 Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 84, 1977, 244-246. 
 
 LEYSIEFFER, F. W. 
 
 Respondent jeopardy in randomized response procedures. 
 Report M338. 
 
 Department of Statistics, The Florida State University, 
 Tallahassee, Florida, 1975. 
 
 LEYSIEFFER, F. W., and WARNER, S. L. 
 
 Respondent jeopardy and optimal designs in randomized 
 response models. 
 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 71, 
 1976, 649-656. 
 
 LIU, P. T. and CHOW, L. P. 
 
 Study of the efficiency of randomized response technique 
 with multiple trials per respondent. Mim. report. 
 Department of Population Dynamics, School of Hygiene and 
 Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 
 Maryland, 1972. 
 
10. 1-10 
 
 LIU, P. T. and CHOW, L. P. 
 
 A new discrete quantitative randomized response model. 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 71, 
 1976, 72-73. 
 
 LIU, P. T. , CHOW, L. P. and MOSLEY, H. W. 
 
 Use of the randomized response technigue with a new 
 randomizing device. 
 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 70, 
 1975, 329-332. 
 
 LOYNES, R. M. 
 
 Asymptotically op t imal randomised response procedures., Mim.. 
 
 report . 
 
 Department of Probability and Statistics, University of 
 
 Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K., 1975. 
 
 Abstract in: International Statistical Review, Vol. 44, 
 
 1976, 225. 
 
 LOYNES, R. M. 
 
 Asymptotically optimal randomized response procedures. 
 Journal of IJie American Statistical Association, Vol. 71, 
 1976, 924-928. 
 
 MOORS, J. J. A. 
 
 Optimization of the unrelated question randomized response 
 
 model. 
 
 Journal of th e American Statistical Association, Vol. 66, 
 
 1971, 627-629. 
 
 PEARL, R. L. 
 
 Iary,ing levels of probability for selecting, sensitive 
 
 questions using the randomized response technigue. B. S. 
 
 Dissertation. 
 
 Biometrics Unit, Cornell University, 1975. 
 
 POLLOCK, K. H. and BEK, Y. 
 
 A comparison of three randomized response models for 
 guantitative data. 
 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 71, 
 1976, 884-886. 
 
10. 1-11 
 
 POOLE, W. K. 
 
 Estimation of the distribution function of a continuous type 
 random variable through randomized response. 
 
 Journal of the Ame ri can Statistical Association Vol. 69, 
 1974, 1002-1005. 
 
 REASER, J„ M. , HARTSOCK, S. , and HOEHN, A. J. 
 
 A iest of the forced alternative random response 
 questionnaire technique. HUMRRO Technical Report 75-9. 
 Human Resources Research Organization, Arlington, Virgina, 
 1975. 
 
 SEN, P. K. 
 
 On unbiased estimation for randomized response models. 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 69, 
 1974, 997-1001. 
 
 SEN, P. K. 
 
 Asymptotically optimal estimators of general parameters in 
 
 randomized response models. 
 
 International Statistical Review, Vol. 44, 1976, 223-224. 
 
 SIMMONS, W. R. 
 
 Response to randomized inquiries - a technique for reducing 
 
 bias. 
 
 In * Statistical Science in Management. 
 
 American Society for Quality Control, Arlington, Virginia, 
 
 1970, 4-B (1) - 4-B (10) . 
 
 SWENSSON, B. 
 
 Stratified randomized response with the special casei a 
 cor- v ine d use of regular interview and randomized response 
 int erv iew. Report No. 45 of the research project Errors in 
 c -r 7 " ys. 
 
 pe tment of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stoc .holm, 1972. 
 
 SWENSSON, B. 
 
 A note on WarnerJ^s technique for randomized res pose. Report 
 No. 56, of the research project Errors in Surveys. 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1973. 
 
10. 1-12 
 
 SWENSSON, B. 
 
 h Hoi® on relations among one-sample randomized response 
 techniques for dichotomies. Report No. 12 of the research 
 project Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1976. 
 
 SWENSSON, B. 
 
 Using, mixtures of techniques for estimating sensitive 
 attributes. Report No. 13 of the research project 
 Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1976. 
 
 SWENSSON, B. 
 
 Survey measurement of sensitive attributes^ Some 
 con ;U: jJs u t io n s . Ph.D. Dissertation. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University . of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1977. 
 
 VITALE, R. A. 
 
 Sequential data absorption: a method for enhancing 
 confidentiality of response. Report No. 10 of the research 
 project Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1976. 
 
 WARNER S. L. 
 
 Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating 
 evasive answer bias. 
 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 60, 
 1965, 63-69. 
 
 WARNER, S. L. 
 
 The linear randomized response model. 
 
 Journal of the American Statis tica l As so ciation, Vol. 66, 
 
 1971, 884-888. 
 
 WARNER, S. L. 
 
 Optimal randomized response models. 
 
 International Statistical Review, Vol. 44, 1976, 20 5-212. 
 
 - 
 
10. 1-13 
 
 WISEMAN, F. , MORIARTY, Ma and SCHAFER, M. 
 
 Estimating public opinion with the randomized response 
 
 model. 
 
 Public QEiHion. Quarterly, Winter 1975-1976, 507-513. 
 
 ZDEP, S. M. and RHODES, I. N. 
 
 Making the randomized response technigue work. 
 
 Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 4, 1976, 531-537. 
 
10. 2-1 
 
 10.2 Combined Questions 
 
 SWENSSON, B. 
 
 Combined guest ionsj_ a new survey technique for eliminating 
 evasive answer bias^ Part One^ Basic theory/ Report No. 70 
 of the research project Errors in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1974. 
 
 SWENSSON, B. 
 
 Combined independent question I. Report No. 7 of the 
 research project Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1975. 
 
 SWENSSON, B. 
 
 Combined indepe nd ent questions II. Report No. 1 1 of the 
 research project Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1976. 
 
 SWENSSON, B. 
 
 Usina. fixtures of techniques for estimating sens itive 
 attributes. Report No. 13 of the research project 
 Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1976. 
 
 SWENSSON, B. 
 
 Combined questions: an alternative data-gather inq device to 
 
 randomized res_p_onse for sensitive questions. 
 
 In: DALENIUS, T. and " KLEVMARKEN, A., Eds., Personal 
 
 integrity and the need for data in the social sciences 
 
 Proceedings of a symposium, March 15-17, 1976. 
 
 Swedish Council for Social Science Research, Stockholm, 
 
 1976. 
 
 SWENSSON, B. 
 
 Survey measurement of sensitive attributes^ Some 
 contributions. Ph.D. Dissertation. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1977. 
 
10.3-1 
 
 10.3 Other Measurement Techniques 
 
 CANNEL, C, and HENSON, R. 
 
 Incentives, motives, and response bias. 
 
 AHIl^Is of Econ om ic and Social Measurement, Vol. 3, 1974, 
 
 307-317. 
 
 DALENIUS, T. 
 
 Protecting confidentiality, bv. means of weighing designs. 
 Report No. 77 of the research project Errors in Surveys. 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1974. 
 
 RAGHAVARAO, D. , and FEDERER, W. T. 
 
 AEEiication of BIB designs as an alternative to the 
 £^H^oiized response m et hod in survey sampling. Mim. report 
 Biometrics Unit, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 1973. 
 
 THEDEEN, T. 
 
 Value- indif f erent observation schemes. Report No. 3 of the 
 research project Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1975. 
 
10.4-1 
 
 10.4 Comparisons of Techniques 
 
 BROWN, G. H. 
 
 Druc[ usage rates as related to method of data acquisition. 
 
 H0MRRO Technical Report 74-20. 
 
 Human Resources Research Organization, Arlington, Virginia, 
 
 1974. 
 
 BROWN, G. H. 
 
 Randomized inquiry vs^ conventional questionnaire method in 
 
 £Sti mating ilnug. i^sa^e rates through mail surveys, HUMRRO 
 
 Technical Report 75-14. 
 
 Human Resources Research Organization, Arlington, Virginia, 
 
 1975. 
 
 BROWN, G. H. and HARDING, F. D. 
 
 A comparison of methods of st ud ying illicit drug usage. 
 
 HUMRRO Technical Report, No. 73-9. 
 
 Human Resources Research Organization, Alexandria, Virginia, 
 
 1973. 
 
 FOLSOM, R. E. 
 
 h. £JiIldomized response validation studyj. comparison of direct 
 
 ■§£<! randomized reporting of DUI arrests, Report, 25 U- 807, 
 
 prepared for U. S. Bureau of the Census. 
 
 Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, N. C. , 
 
 1974. 
 
 KROTKI, K. J. and FOX, B. 
 
 The randomized response technique, the interview, and the 
 
 self-administered questionnaire: an empirical comparison of 
 
 fertility reports. 
 
 Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section - 1974 
 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D. C. , 1975, 
 
 367-371. 
 
 KROTKI, K. J., and McDANIEL, S. A. 
 
 Three estimates of illegal abortion in Alberta, Canada: 
 
 survey, mail-back questionnaire, and randomized response 
 
 technique. 
 
 Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, Vol. 
 
 46. 
 
 Proceedings of the 40th Session, Warsaw 1975, Book 2, 67-70. 
 
10. 4-2 
 
 LERNER, M. 
 
 The collection of data on deviant behavior: public policy 
 
 issues. 
 
 Paper presented at the 39th session of the International 
 
 Statistical Institute, Vienna, 1973. 
 
 Abstract in: Bulletin of the I nter national Statistical 
 
 Institute, Vol. 45. ££Oceedincjs of the 39 th Session, 
 
 Vienna, 1973, Book 2, 150. 
 
 LOCANDER, W. B. 
 
 J.U Investigation of interview me thod^ threat and response 
 
 distortion, Ph.D. Dissertation. 
 
 University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, 1974. 
 
 LOCANDER, W., SUDMAN, S., and BRADBUPN, N. 
 
 An investigation of interview method, threat and response 
 
 distortion. 
 
 Proceedi ngs of the Social Statist ics Sect ion - 1974. 
 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D. C. , 1975, 
 
 21-27. 
 
 SMITH, L. L., FEDERER, W. T. and RAGHAVARAO, D. 
 
 A comparison of three technigues for eliciting truthful 
 
 answers to sensitive guestions. 
 
 Proceedings Q.%. the Social Statistics Section - 1974. 
 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D. C. , 1975, 
 
 447-452. 
 
 SWENSSON, B. 
 
 Combined independent guestions versus randomized response. 
 Efficiencies under egual degree of protection. Report No. 
 15 of the research project Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1976. 
 
 SWENSSON, B. 
 
 Survey Measurement of se_H.sit.ive attributes^ Some 
 contributions. Ph.D. Dissertation. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1977. 
 
1 1. 1-1 
 
 11. PROTECTIVE TECHNIQUES - DATA PROCESSING AND STORAGE 
 11.1 File Techniques 
 
 ASTIN, A. W. and EORUCH, R. F. 
 
 h. "iiHiS" system for assurincj confidentiality of research 
 data in longitudinal studies. Research report, Vol. 5 r 
 No. 3. 
 
 American Council on Education, Washington, D.C., 1970. 
 Also in American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 7, 1970, 
 615-624, and in: I. J. HOFFMAN, Ed., Security and privacy in 
 computer systems. Melville Publishing Company, Los Angeles, 
 California, 1973, 294-303. 
 
 CAMPBELL, D. T. , BOROCH, R. F. , SCHWARTZ, R. D. , and 
 STEINBEPG, J. 
 
 Confidentiality-preserving modes of access ' to files and to 
 
 interfile exchange for useful statistical analysis. 
 
 In: RIVLIN, A., Ed., Protecting Individual Privacy, in 
 
 Evaluation Research 
 
 National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C. , 1975, 
 
 A1-A25. 
 
 Also in: Evaluation Quarterly., Vol. 1, No. 2, 1977, 269-300. 
 
11.2-1 
 
 11.2 Aggregation Technigues 
 
 CRAMER, J. S. 
 
 Efficient grouping, regression and correlation in Engel 
 curve analysis. 
 
 JoU-EH^i 2f the American Statistical Association, Vol. 59, 
 1964, 233-25C. 
 
 EDWARDS, J. B. and ORCUTT, G. H. , 
 
 Should aggregation prior to estimation be the rule? 
 
 Xk^ E§view of Economics and Statistics , Vol. 51, 19 69, 
 
 409-420. 
 
 FEIGE, E. L., and WATTS, H. W. 
 
 Projection of privacy. through mi cr o-ac[C[r ega t i o n , Mim. 
 
 report. 
 
 Social Systems Research Institute, University of Wisconsin, 
 
 Madison, Wisconsin, 1967. 
 
 FEIGE, E. L. and WATTS, H. W. 
 
 An investigation of the conseguences of partial aggregation 
 
 of micro-economic data. 
 
 Econometrica, Vol. 40, 1972, 343-360. 
 
 FEIGE, E. L. , and WATTS, H. W. 
 
 Protection of privacy through macroaggregation. 
 
 In: BISCOE, R. L. Ed. , Data bases^ computers and the social 
 
 sciences 
 
 John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1970. 
 
 GRUNFELD, Y. and GPILICHES, Z. 
 
 Is aggregation necessarily bad? 
 
 The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 42, 1970, 1-13. 
 
 ORCUTT, G. H., WATTS, H. W. , and EDWARDS, J. B. 
 Data aggregation and information loss. 
 The American Economic Review, Vol. 58, 1968, 773-787. 
 
 PRAIS, S. J. and AITCHISON, J. 
 
 The grouping of observations in regression analysis. 
 
 Review of the International Statistical Institute, Vol. 22, 
 
 1954, 1-22. 
 
11. 2-2 
 
 RUGGLES, N. D. and RUGGLES, R. 
 
 A strategy for merging and matching microdata sets. 
 
 Anna ls of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 3, 1974, 
 
 353 - 371. 
 
11.3-1 
 
 11.3 Privacy Transformations; Encryption 
 
 BRANSTAD, D. K. 
 
 Data protection through cryptography. 
 Dimensions/NBS, September 1975, 195-197 and 214-215. 
 
 BRANSTAD, D. K. 
 
 Encryption protection in computer data communication. 
 
 Paper read at the fourth data communications symposium, 
 
 Quebec, Canada, 1975. 
 
 CARROL, J. M., and MCLLELLAN, P. M. 
 
 Fast "infinite-key" privacy transformation for res- 
 ource-sharing systems. 
 
 In: L. HOFFMAN, Ed. , Security and privacy in computer 
 systems 
 Melville Publishing Company, Los Angeles, California, 1973. 
 
 CLAYTON, C. A. and POOLE, W. K. 
 
 Use of randomized £§s_ponse techniques in maintaining 
 
 confidentiality of data. Draft report, 252U-1159, prepared 
 
 for U. S. Bureau of the Census. 
 
 Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, N. C. , 
 
 1976. 
 
 COMPUTATION PLANNING 
 
 Building- block cryptography for file/access protection. 
 Computation Planning, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland. 
 
 DALENIUS, T. 
 
 Privacy transformations for statistical information systems. 
 
 Report No. 9 of the research project Confidentiality in 
 
 Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 
 Stockholm, 1976. 
 
 Also in: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 
 
 1, 1977, 73-86. 
 
 DIFFIE, H. and HELLMAN, M. E. 
 
 New directions in cryptography. 
 
 IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. IT- 22, 
 
 November 1976, 644-654. 
 
11.3-2 
 
 FEISTEL, H. 
 
 Cryptography and computer privacy. 
 
 Scientific American, Vol. 228, No. 5, 1973, 15-23, 
 
 FRIEDMAN, T. D. and HOFFMAN, L. J. 
 
 Execution time requirements for encipherment programs, 
 Communications of the ACM, vol. 17, 1974, 445-449. 
 
 GARDNER, M. 
 
 A new kind of cipher that would take millions of years to 
 
 break. 
 
 Scientific American, Vol.237, No. 2, 19 77, 120-124. 
 
 GIRSDANSKY, M. B. 
 
 Cryptology, the computer, and data privacy. 
 Computers and Automation, April 197 2, 12-19 
 
 HAMMER, C 
 
 Signature simulation and certain cryptographic codes, 
 Communications of the ACM, Vol. 14, 1971, 3-14. 
 
 INGEMARSSON, I. 
 
 Stochastic transformation to preserve anony_mity_ in stored 
 data. Report No. 4 of the research project Confidentiality 
 in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1975. 
 
 INGEMARSSON, I. 
 
 Application of stochastic transformation to preserve 
 anonymity in survey_s. Report No. 18 of the research project 
 Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1976. 
 
 KRISHNAMURTHY, C. V. 
 
 Computer cryptographic techniques for processing and storage 
 
 of confidential information. 
 
 International Journal of Control, Vol. 12, 1970, 753-761. 
 
11.3-3 
 
 PLESS, V. 
 
 Encryption schemes for computer confidentiality, MAC 
 
 Technical Memorandum 63. 
 
 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. , 
 
 1975. 
 
 REED, I. S. 
 
 The application of information theory to privacy, in data 
 
 banks, R-1282-NSF. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1973. 
 
 REED, I. S. 
 
 Information theory and privacy in data banks. 
 
 AFIPS Conference Procee d ings, Vol. 42, National Computer 
 
 Conference and Exposition. 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, New Jersey, 1973, 581-587. 
 
 REED, I. S. 
 
 IHf2£iation theory and privacy in data banks, P-49 52. 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1973. 
 
 PIVEST, R. L., SHAMIR, A. and ADLEMAN, L. 
 
 A l§.thod for obtaining digital signatures and public-key_ 
 cryptosystems. MIT/LCS/TM-8 2. 
 
 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 
 Massachusetts, 1977. 
 
 SHANNON, C. E. 
 
 Information theory of secrecy systems. 
 
 Bell Systems Technical Journal, Vol. 28, 1949, 656-715. 
 
 SKATRUD, R. 0. 
 
 A consideration of the application of cryptographic 
 
 technigues to data processing. 
 
 AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Vol. 35, Fall Joint Computer 
 
 Conference. 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, New Jersey, 1969, 111-117. 
 
 Also in: HOFFMAN, L. J., Ed., Security and privacy in 
 
 computer systems. 
 
 Melville Publishing Company, Los Angeles, California, 1973, 
 
 124-138. 
 
11.3-4 
 
 STAHL, F. A. 
 
 A homophonic cipher for computational cryptography. 
 
 AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Vol. 42, National Computer 
 
 Conference and Exposition. 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, New Jersey, 1973, 563-568. 
 
 TUCKERMAN, B. 
 
 i stu.cl_y of the Vigenere-Vernan sincjle and multiple loop 
 
 enciphering systems, Report RC 2879, IBM. 
 
 T. J- Watson Research Lab., Yorktown Heights, N.Y., 1970. 
 
 TURN, R. 
 
 ££ivacy_ transformations for databank systems. P-4955. 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1973. 
 
 U. S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 
 
 Federal information processing data encryption. Proposed 
 
 standard. 
 
 Federal Register, Vol. 40, No. 149, Friday, August 1, 1975, 
 
 32395 - 32414. 
 
 S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 
 
 Encryption algorithm for computer data protection. Reguest 
 
 for comments. 
 
 Federal Register, Vol. 40, No. 52, March 17, 1975, 
 
 12134-12139. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1975. 
 
 U. S. NATIONAL BUREAUS OF STANDARDS 
 
 Data encrxption standard. FIPS PUB 46. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1977. 
 
 VAN TASSEL, D. 
 
 Advanced cryptographic technigues for computers. 
 Communications of the ACM, vol. 12, No. 12, December 19 69, 
 
 664-665. 
 
 VAN TASSEL, D. L. 
 
 Cryptographic technigues for computers. 
 
 AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Vol. 34, Spring Joint 
 
 Computer Conference 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, N. J., 1969, 367-372. 
 
11.4-1 
 
 11-4 Other Techniques 
 
 ALTER, H. E. 
 
 Creation of a synthetic data set by linking records of the 
 
 Canadian survey of consumer finances with the family 
 
 expenditure survey 1970. 
 
 Annuls of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 3, 1974, 
 
 373-394. 
 
 HANSEN, M. H. 
 
 Insuring confidentiality of individual records in data 
 
 storage and retrieval for statistical purposes. 
 
 AFIPS Conference Proceedings Vol. 39, Fall Joint Computer 
 
 Conference. 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, N. J., 1971, 579-585. 
 
12-1 
 
 12. PROTECTIVE TECHNIQUES - SECURITY IN COMPUTER SYSTEMS 
 
 ALLEN, B.P. 
 
 EDP security, 
 
 Data Ma_nagement, Jan- 1972, 18-24. 
 
 ALLEN, B.R. 
 
 Computer security. 
 
 Data Management, Feb. 1972, 24-30. 
 
 BARAN, P. 
 
 On distributed communications^ IX._ Security^ secrecy^ and 
 
 tamper-free considerations. RM- 376 5- PR. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1964. 
 
 BRITISH COMPUTER SOCIETY 
 
 Privacy and the computer - steps to practicality. 
 British Computer Society, London, 1972. 
 
 BROWNE, P. S. 
 
 Computer security - a survey. 
 
 AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Vol. 45, National Computer 
 
 Conference 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, New Jersey, 1976. 
 
 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF. 
 
 Intergovernmental Board on Electronic Data Processing. 
 Guidelines establishing £e2U^£®mjen.£.s_ for security, and 
 confidentiality, of information systems 
 
 State of California, Documents Section, Sacramento, 
 California, 1974. 
 
 CARROLL, J. M. and REEVES, P., 
 
 Security of data communications: a realization of piggyback 
 
 infiltration. 
 
 Infor, Vol. 11, 1973, 226-231. 
 
 CBEMA 
 
 The role of computers in privacy, confident iality^ data 
 
 security. 
 
 Computer and Business Eguipment Manufacturers Association, 
 
 Washington, D.C. , 1973. 
 
12-2 
 
 CBEMA 
 
 Privacy ser i es , No . 1 , 2 , 3 . 
 
 Computer and Business Equipment Manufacturers Association, 
 
 Washington, D.C., 1973. 
 
 COMBER, E. V. 
 
 Management of confidential information. 
 
 AII£S Conf er ence Proceedings, Vol. 35, Fall Joint Computer 
 
 Conference 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, New Jersey, 1969, 135-143. 
 
 CONWAY, R. W., MAXWELL, W. L., and MORGAN, H. L. 
 
 On the implementation of security measures in information 
 
 systems. 
 
 Communications of the ACM, Vol. 15, 1972, 211-220. 
 
 DAHLQUIST, G., INGEMARSSON, I., and RIESEL, H. 
 
 A randomly generated program for automatic identity 
 
 checking. 
 
 BIT, Vol. 15, 1975, 381-384. 
 
 DALFEN, C. 
 
 International factors. A study by the Privacy and Computers 
 
 Task Force. Department of Communications/Department of 
 
 Justice, 
 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
 DAVIS, R. M. 
 
 Privacy and security in data systems. 
 
 Computers and People, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1974, 20-27. 
 
 DAVIS, R. M. 
 
 A technologist's view of privacy and security in automated 
 
 information systems. 
 
 lut<jers Journal of Computers and Law, Vol. 4, 1975, 264-293. 
 
 DIAL, 0. E. , and GOLDBERG, E. M. 
 
 £ri vac^ security and computers^ Guidelines for municipal 
 sLR& other public information systems. 
 Praeger, New York, 1975. 
 
12-3 
 
 EDP ANALYZER 
 
 Protecting valuable data: Parts 1-2. 
 
 IDP Analyzer, Vol. 11, Dec, 1973; Vol. 12, Jan. 1974. 
 
 ELLIS, L., Ed. 
 
 Privacy and the -omputer - steps to practicality. 
 The British Computer Society, London, 1972. 
 
 FARR, H. A. L., GRAD, B. C. , and WONG, K. K. , 
 Security, for computer systems. 
 
 The National Computing Centre Limited, Manchester, England 
 1972. 
 
 FENWICK, W. A. 
 Privacy. 
 Data Management, vol. 13, May 1975, 18-21 
 
 GOLDSTEIN, R. C. 
 
 The costs of privacy. 
 Datamation, Oct. 1975, 65-69. 
 
 GOLDSTEIN, R. C. 
 
 The cost of .privacy^ Operational and and financial 
 
 indications of databank -privacy regulation. 
 
 Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. Minneapolis, Minnesota, 
 
 1975. 
 
 GOTLIEB, C. C, and HUME, J. N. P. 
 
 Systems capacity for data security. A study by the Privacy 
 and Computer Task Force. Department of Communications/ 
 Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
 HAMILTON, P. 
 
 Computer security. 
 
 Auerbach Publishers, Philadelphia, Pa., 1973. 
 
 HANSEN, M. H. 
 
 Insuring confidentiality of individual records in data 
 
 storage and retrieval for statistical purposes. 
 
 AZI£S Conference Proceedings Vol. 39, Fall Joint Computer 
 
 Conference. 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, N. J., 1971, 579-585. 
 
12-4 
 
 HELLMAN, J. J. 
 
 Privacy and information systems^, an argument and an 
 
 il!!£i£l£Il 1 a t i o n • P - 4 2 9 8 . 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1970. 
 
 HOFFMAN, L. J. 
 
 Computers and privacy: a survey. 
 Computing Surveys, Vol. 1, 1969, 85-103 
 
 HOFFMAN, L. J. 
 
 The formulary model for flexible privacy and access 
 
 controls. 
 
 4Z1PS Conference Proceedings, Vol. 39, Fall Joint Computer 
 
 Conference. 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, N. J., 1971, 587-601. 
 
 HOFFMAN, L. J., Ed. 
 
 Security and .privacy in computer systems. 
 
 Melville Publishing Company, Los Angeles, California, 1973. 
 
 HOFFMAN, L.J. 
 
 Modern methods for computer security and privacy. 
 Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1977. 
 
 HOFFMAN, L. J. and MILLER, W. F. 
 
 Getting a personal dossier from a statistical data bank. 
 Datamation, May 1970, 74-75. 
 
 HOFFMAN, L. J. and MILLER, W. F. 
 
 Getting a personal dossier from a statistical data bank. 
 
 In: HOFFMAN, L. J. , Ed. , Security and privacy in computer 
 
 systems. 
 
 Melville Publishing Company, Los Angeles, California, 1973, 
 
 289-293. 
 
 HOLLINGWORTH, D. 
 
 Enhancing computer system security. P-5064. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1973 
 
12-5 
 
 HONEYWELL COMPUTER JOURNAL 
 
 Confidentiality of personal data. 
 
 Honeywell Computer Journal, Vol. 7, 1973, III-1 — III-4 
 
 HONEYWELL INFORMATION SYSTEMS 
 
 Computer sec ur ity and privacy symposium. Proceedings of a 
 
 symposium, April 6-7, 1976. 
 
 Honeywell Information Systems, Waltham, Massachusetts, 1976. 
 
 HONEYWELL INFORMATION SYSTEMS 
 
 Computer Security and privacy symposium. Proceedings of a 
 
 symposium, April 29-30, 1975. 
 
 Honeywell Information Systems, Waltham, Massachusetts, 1975. 
 
 IBM CORPORATION 
 
 The considerations of data security in a comp_u ter 
 
 fLH.y.i r on men t • 
 
 International Business Machines Corporation, White Plains, 
 
 New York, 1970. 
 
 IBM CORPORATION 
 
 Xk§ considerations of physical security in a computer 
 ^HY i ronien t . 
 
 International Business Machines Corporation, White Plains, 
 New York, 1972. 
 
 IBM CORPORATION 
 
 IBM data security symposium, April 1973. 
 
 International Business Machines Corporation, White Plains, 
 
 New York, 1973. 
 
 IBM CORPORATION 
 
 ii2 suggestions for im.proying security of data processing 
 
 o£££a£ions. 
 
 International Business Machines Corporation, White Plains, 
 
 New York, 1973. 
 
 IBM CORPORATION 
 
 Data security and data processing: study of specific aspects 
 
 of. data security. 
 
 IBM Corporation, White Plains, New York, 1974. 
 
12-6 
 
 IBM SWEDEN 
 
 User techniques to prevent the invasion of privacy. 
 International Symposium, October 2-3, 1973. 
 IBM Sweden, Stockholm, 1973. 
 
 IBM SWEDEN 
 
 Data security - threats and deficiencies in computer 
 ope ra tions. Report on a completed study - a translation 
 from an IBM Svenska AB publication. 
 
 International Business Machines Corporation, White Plains, 
 New York, 1975. 
 
 IBM SWEDEN 
 
 AH §x§cutiye_^s .guide to data security. Translation from an 
 IBM Svenska AB publication. 
 
 International Business Machines Corporation, White Plains, 
 New York, 1975. 
 
 ILLINOIS, STATE OF, and IBM CORPORATION 
 
 Th_§ elements and economics of information RLkl§.£l and 
 
 security . 
 
 State of Illinois, Project SAFE, Springfield, Illinois, 
 
 1974. 
 
 INGEMARSSON, I. 
 
 Protection of information stored in a computer system. 
 
 In: DALENIUS, T. and KLEVMARKEN, A., Eds. Personal integrity 
 
 and the need for data in the social sciences Proceedings of 
 
 a symposium, March 15-17, 1976. 
 
 Swedish Council for Social Science Research, Stockholm, 
 
 1976. 
 
 JOHNSON, S. M. 
 
 Certain number- theoretic questions in access control, 
 
 R-1494-NSF. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1974. 
 
 JONES, M. 
 
 Privacy . 
 
 David 5 Charles, Inc., North Pomfret, Vermont, 1974 
 
12-7 
 
 KAHN, D. 
 
 The code breakers. 
 MacMillan, New York, 1967. 
 
 KAM, J. B. and ULLMAN, J. D. 
 
 A model of statistical databases and their security. 
 
 ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1977, 
 
 1-10. 
 
 KATZAN, H. 
 
 Computer data security. 
 Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. 
 
 New York, 1973. 
 
 LAMSAC. 
 
 Computer privacy^ Notes of guidance for local authorities. 
 Report of the computer panel of LAMSAC 
 
 Local Authorities Management Services and Computer Committee 
 London, U.K., 1972. 
 
 LEAL, H. A. 
 
 Privacy and the computer. 
 
 In: JOHNSTON, D. , Ed., Proceedings of the computers and the 
 
 law conference, 196-218. 
 
 LINDEN, T. A. Ed. 
 
 Security analysis and enhancements of computer operating 
 
 systems. NBSIR 76-1041. 
 
 National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 1976. 
 
 MALLMANN, C. 
 
 Das Problem der Privatsphaere innerhalb des Datenschutzes. 
 (The problem of individual privacy in data security.) 
 Der of fent lichen Ver waiting, Vol. 5, 1971, 19-26. 
 
 MARSH, R. 
 
 Making data more secure. 
 Datamation, October 1976, 67-69. 
 
 MARTIN, J. 
 
 Security^ accuracy, and privacy in computer systems. 
 Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1973. 
 
12-8 
 
 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STATE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 
 
 IHf 2£31iLtion. systems technology in state governments 1973. 
 
 NASIS Report. 
 
 Council of State Governments, Lexington, Kentucky, 1974. 
 
 NETHERLANDS CENTRE FOR INFORMATICS 
 
 Privacy and security in E.D.P., Paper No. 26. 
 Informatics Bibliography Service, Vol. 1, Sept., 1973, 
 
 NEWMANN, P. G., EOBINSON, L. , SEVITT, K. N. , BOYER, R. S. and 
 SAXENA, A. R. 
 
 A pro y ably secure operating system. 
 
 Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California, 1975. 
 
 NIBLETT, G. B. F. 
 
 Digital information and the privacy problem. 
 
 OECD Informatics Studies, 
 
 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 
 
 Paris, 1971. 
 
 NIELSEN, N.R. and RUDER, E. 
 
 Computersystem integrity safeguards. 
 
 Int. o^H^tion Processing 77. 
 
 North-Holland Publishing Company, New York, 1977, 337-342. 
 
 NIELSEN, N. R. , RUDER, B. and BRANDIN, D. H. 
 
 Effective safeguards fcr computer system inteyrity. 
 
 AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Vol. 45, National Computer 
 
 Conference. 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, New Jersey, 1976. 
 
 NOLL, A. M. 
 
 Interactions of computers and privacy. 
 
 Honeywell Computing Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1973, 163-172. 
 
 OECD 
 
 Development in data protection and privacy by Organization 
 l2£ Economic Co-operation and Development Countries. 
 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 
 Paris, 1975. 
 
12-9 
 
 OLSSON, L. 
 
 Measures to protect privacy in a statistical database, Mim. 
 
 report. 
 
 National Central Bureau of Statistics, Stockholm, 1973. 
 
 OLSSON, L. 
 
 Protection of output and stored data in statistical data 
 
 bases. Mim. report. 
 
 National Central Bureau of Statistics, Stockholm, 1975. 
 
 OMBUDSMAN COMMITTEE ON PRIVACY 
 
 Privacy^ security and the information processing industry. 
 Association fcr Computing Machinery, New York, N.Y., 1976. 
 
 PATRICK, R. L., Ed. 
 
 AZI£S system review manual on security 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, New Jersey. 
 
 PECK, P. L. 
 
 Survey, of applicable safeguards for insuring the integrity 
 of information in data processing environment .. 
 The MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia, 1971. 
 
 PETERSON, H. E. and TURN, R. 
 
 System implications of information privacy. P-3504. 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1967. 
 
 RENNINGER, C. R. , Ed. 
 
 Approaches to privacy and security in computer systems. 
 National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C. , 1974. 
 
 RENNINGER, C. R. and BRANSTAD, D. K. , Eds. 
 
 Government looks and privacy and security in computer 
 
 systems. 
 
 National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C, 1974. 
 
 ROTENBERG, L 
 
 Making computers keep secrets, MAC TR-115. 
 
 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 
 
 Massachusetts, 1974. 
 
12-10 
 
 ROWE, B. C. , Ed. 
 
 Pri vac y, computers and y.ou. 
 
 The National Computing Centre Limited, Manchester, 1972 
 
 SALTZER, J. H. 
 
 Ongoing research and development on information protection, 
 ACM Operating System Review, Vol. 8, Nr. 3, 1974, 8-24. 
 
 SALTZER, J. H. and SCHROEDER, M. D. 
 
 The protection of information in computer systems. 
 
 Proceedings of the IEEE. 
 
 IEEE Computer Society, Long Beach, California, 1975. 
 
 SHAPIRO, N. Z. and DAVIS, M. 
 
 Uncrackable data banks, Report R-1382-NSF. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1973. 
 
 SUNDGREN, B. 
 
 Security and privacy of statistical databases. 
 
 Statistisk Ti dsk rif t. National Central Bureau of Statistics, 
 
 Stockholm, 1972, 299-312. 
 
 THORSEN, J.-E. Ed. 
 
 Computer security. - §.guipment x pe rson nel, and data. 
 Security World Publishing Company, Inc., Los Angeles, 1974. 
 
 TSAKOS, S., Chairman 
 
 Symposium proceedings. Trends S applications 1977j_ computer 
 
 security and integrity.. 
 
 IEEE Computer Society, Long Beach, California, 1977. 
 
 TURN, R. 
 
 h brief history of comp_uter p_ri va^y_/security_ research at 
 
 Rand. P-4798. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1972. 
 
 TURN, R. 
 
 E£iy_iicv_ and security in personal information databank 
 
 systems. Report R-1044-NSF. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1974. 
 
12-11 
 
 TURN, R. 
 
 Toward data security enc[ineerinc[. p-5142. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1974. 
 
 TURN, R. 
 
 Remarks on the instrumentation of databank systems for data 
 
 security. P-5151. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1974. 
 
 TURN, R. 
 
 P ri vacy protection in databanks: principles and costs. 
 
 P-5296. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1974. 
 
 TURN, R. 
 
 Cost implications of privacy pro tection in databank systems. 
 
 P-5321. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1975. 
 
 TURN, R. 
 
 Privacy and security i§£ects of centralization/ 
 
 3eceji t r cO. iz a t io n . 
 
 Paper read at International Symposium, March 19-20, 1975, 
 
 Stockholm. 
 
 IBM Sweden, Stockholm, 1975. 
 
 TURN, R. , FREDRICKSON, R. , and HOLLINGWORTH, D. 
 
 Data security research at the Rand Corporation:, d escr iption 
 
 and commentary. P-4914. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1972. 
 
 TURN, R. and PETERSEN, H. E. 
 
 Security of computerized information systems. P-4 40 5 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1970. 
 
 TURN, R. , and SHAPIRO, N. Z. 
 
 Privacy and security in databank systems j measures of 
 
 §f f ectiveness x costs x and protector-intruder interactions. 
 
 P-4871. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1972. 
 
 Also in: AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Vol. 41, Fall Joint 
 
 Computer Conference. 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale New Jersey, 1972, 435-444. 
 
12-12 
 
 TURN, R. , SHAPIRO, N. Z., and JUNCOSA, M. L. 
 
 Privacy and security in centralized vs.. decentralized 
 
 databank systems. P-53 46. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1975. 
 
 TURN, R. , SHAPIRO, N. Z. , and JUNCOSA, M. 
 
 Privacy and security in centralized vs. decentralized 
 
 databank systems. 
 
 Policy Sciences, Vol. 7, Mar. 1976, 17-29. 
 
 TURN, R. and WARE, W. H. 
 
 Privacy and security in computer systems. 
 
 A meri can Scientist, Vol. 63, 1975, 196-203. 
 
 Also Report P-5361, The Rand Corporation, Santa, Monica, 
 
 California, 1975. 
 
 TURN, R. and WARE, W. 
 
 P£±Vcicy and security issues in information systems. P-56 84. 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1976. 
 
 TURN, P. and WARE, W. H. 
 
 Privacy and security issues in informations systems. 
 
 IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. C-25, No. 12, 1976, 
 
 1353-1361. 
 
 U. K. HOME OFFICE. 
 
 Computers^ safeguards for privacy. Command Paper Cmnd. 6354. 
 Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1975. 
 
 S. CONGRESS. SENATE. 
 
 Committee on Government Operations. 
 
 Staff study of computer security in federal progxrams. 95th 
 
 Cong., 1st sess., February, 1977. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1977. 
 
 S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
 
 ADP Security Majma.1. D0D 5200. 28-M. 
 Department of Defense, Washington, D.C., 1973. 
 
12-13 
 
 a. S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 
 
 Government looks at privacy and security, in computer 
 
 systems, NBS Technical Note 809. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1974. 
 
 U. S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 
 
 Guidelines for automatic data processing physical security 
 
 a nd risk management. FIPS PUB 31. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1974. 
 
 U. S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 
 
 Controlled accessibility workshijs report. NBS Technical Note 
 
 827. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D- C, 1974. 
 
 U. S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 
 
 Approaches to privacy and security in computer systems. NBS 
 
 Special Publication 404. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1974. 
 
 U. S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 
 
 Government looks at privacy and security in computer 
 
 systems. NBS Technical Note 809. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1974. 
 
 U. S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 
 
 Approac he s to privacy and security in computer systems, NBS 
 
 Special Publication 404. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1974. 
 
 U. S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 
 
 Exploring privacy and djita security costs - a summary of a 
 
 workshop. NBS Technical Note 876. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1975. 
 
 U. S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 
 
 Computer security guidelines for implementing the privacy 
 
 act of !974. FIPS PUB 41. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1975. 
 
12-14 
 
 U. S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 
 
 Security analysis and enhancement of computer QP,erating 
 
 systems. NBSIR 76-1041. 
 
 National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 1976. 
 
 U. S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 
 
 Glossary for computer systems security. FIPS PUB 39. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1976. 
 
 U. S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS and ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING 
 MACHINERY 
 
 !xe_c_utive guide to computer sec ur ity. 
 
 National Bureau of Standards and Association for Computing 
 
 Machinery, Washington, D. C. , undated 
 
 U. S. NAVAL SHIP RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER 
 
 ADP data security and privacy^ Proceedings of the conference 
 on secure data sharing. 
 
 Naval Ship Research and Development Center, Bethesda, 
 Maryland, 1973. 
 
 VAN TASSEL, D. 
 
 Information security in a computer environment. 
 Computers and Automation, July 1969, 24-28. 
 
 VAN TASSEL, D. 
 
 Computer security IQanagement. 
 
 Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1972. 
 
 VAN TASSEL, D. 
 
 Daily surveillance sheet, 1987, from a nationwide data bank 
 Computers and People, Aug. 1975, 31 - 32. 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 Security and privacy: Similarities and differences. 
 
 AZI£S Conference Proceedings, Vol. 30, Spring Joint 
 
 Computer Conference, AFIPS. 
 
 Thompson Book Co., Washington, D.C. , 1967, 287-290. 
 
12-15 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 Security and .privacy in computer systems, P-3544. 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1967. 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 Computer data banks and security controls. P-43 29. 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1970. 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 Computers^ personal privacy and human choice. P 5149. 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1973. 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 Computer privacy and computer security. P-53 54. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1974. 
 
 WASSERMAN, J. J. 
 
 Plugging the leaks in computer security. 
 Harvard Business Review, Vol. 47, 1969, 119-129. 
 
 WEISS, H. 
 
 Computer security; an overview. 
 Datamation, Jan., 1974, 42-47. 
 
 ZIMMERMAN, M.A., C'NEILL, M. E. , and KING, D. F. 
 
 How to implement security and privacy- Department of Justice 
 regulations, title 28 and beyond. 
 Theorem, San Jose, California, 1976. 
 
13-1 
 
 13. PROTECTIVE TECHNIQUES - RELEASE OF STATISTICS 
 
 BARABBA, V.P. and KAPLAN, D. L. 
 
 U.S. Census Bureau statistical techniques to prevent 
 disclosure — the right to privacy vs. the need to know. 
 Paper presented at the 2nd session of the International 
 Association of Survey Statisticians, Warsaw, 1975. 
 
 CANADA, STATISTICS CANADA 
 
 GRDSR: Facts by Small Areas. 
 Statistics Canada, Ottawa, June 1972 
 
 CASSEL, C-M. 
 
 Q.R probability based disclosures in frequency tables. Mim. 
 
 report. 
 
 National Central Bureau of Statistics, Stockholm, Sweden, 
 
 1975. 
 
 CASSEL, C-M 
 
 Probability based disclosures. 
 
 In: DALENIUS, T. and KLEVMARKEN, A., Eds., Personal 
 
 integrity aPil the H§ed for data in the social sciences 
 
 Proceedings of a symposium, March 15-17, 1976. 
 
 Swedish Council for Social Science Research, Stockholm, 
 
 1976. 
 
 COX, L. H. 
 
 Statistical disclosure in publication hierarchies. Report 
 No. 14 of the research project Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1976. 
 
 DALENIUS, T. 
 
 lowards a methodolocjy. for statistical disclosure control. 
 
 Report No. 19 of the research project Confidentiality in 
 
 Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 
 Stockholm, 1977. 
 
 DALENIUS, T. 
 
 Data base insecurity and the statistical disclosure problem. 
 Report No. 24 of the research project Confidentiality in 
 Surveys. 
 
13-2 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1977. 
 
 FELLEGI, I. P. 
 
 On the question of statistical confidentiality. 
 
 iZ2il£S.^i °f ill® Aj^£i£§.H Statistical Association, Vol. 67, 
 
 1972, 7-18. 
 
 FELLEGI, I. P. 
 
 Controlled random rounding. 
 
 Survey Me t h o dol o c[v. , Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Vol.1, 1975, 
 
 123-133. 
 
 FELLEGI, I. P., and PHILLIPS, J. L. 
 
 Statistical confidentiality: some theory and applications to 
 
 data dissemination. 
 
 AHH^I§ °JL Economic and Social Measurement, Vol, 3, 1974. 
 
 399-409. 
 
 FRANK, 0. 
 
 Reconstruction of individual data from classif icational 
 
 f refiuenci distributions. Mim. report. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, 
 
 1973. 
 
 FRANK, 0. 
 
 Individual disclosures from frequency tables. 
 
 In: DALENIUS, T. and KLEVMARKEN, A., Eds., Personal 
 
 inteqrity. and the need for data in the social sciences 
 
 Proceedings of a symposium, March 15-17, 1976. 
 
 Swedish Council for Social Science Research, Stockholm, 
 
 1976. 
 
 FRANK, 0. 
 
 JkH application of information theory to the P_roblem of 
 statistical disclosure. Report No. 20 of the research 
 project Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1977. 
 
13-3 
 
 GELLMAN,, H. S. 
 
 Statistical data banks and their effects on privacy.. A study 
 by the Privacy and Computers Task Force. Department of 
 Communications/Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
 HANSEN, M- H. 
 
 Some aspects of confidentiality in information systems. 
 
 In: RICKERT, J. E. and HAIE, S. L. , Eds. Papers from the 
 
 Eighth Annual Conference of the Urban x Regional Information 
 
 Systems Association, September 3-5, 1970. Louisville, 
 
 Kentucky. 
 
 Kiney Printing Company, Akron, Ohio, 1970. 
 
 HANSEN, M. H. 
 
 Insuring confidentiality of individual records in data 
 
 storage and retrieval for statistical purposes. 
 
 AZIPS Conference Proceedings Vol. 39, Fall Joint Computer 
 
 Conference. 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, N. J., 1971, 579-585. 
 
 HIPSCH, P. 
 
 The punchcard snoopers. 
 
 The Nation, October 16, 1967, 369-372. 
 
 JUSTER, F. T. 
 
 Microdata, economic research, and the production of economic 
 knowledge. 
 
 AMERICAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, Papers and Proceedings, 
 Vol. 60, No. 2, 1970. 
 
 KAM, J. B. and ULLMAN, J. D. 
 
 A model of statistical databases and their security. 
 ACM transactions on Database Systems, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1977, 
 10.. 
 
 NARGUNDKAR, M. S . , ind SAVELAND, W. 
 
 Random rounding to prevent statistical disclosures. 
 Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section - 1972 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D. C. , 1972, 
 382-385. 
 
13-4 
 
 NEWMAN, D. 
 
 Techniques for ensuring the confidentiality of census 
 information in Great Britain. 
 
 Paper presented at the 2nd session of the International 
 Association of Survey Statisticians, Warsaw, 1975. 
 
 RAPAPORT, E. and SUNDGREN, B. 
 
 Output protection in statistical data bases. 
 
 Paper presented at the 2nd session of the International 
 
 Association of Survey Statisticians, Warsaw, 1975. 
 
 REISS, S. P. 
 
 Statistical database confidentiality. Report No. 25 of the 
 research project Confidentiality in Surveys. 
 
 Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, 
 Stockholm, 1977. 
 
 SUNDGREN, B. 
 
 Security and privacy of statistical databases. 
 
 Statistisk Tidskrift, National Central Bureau of Statistics, 
 
 Stockholm, 1972, 299-312. 
 
 SWEDEN. NATIONAL CENTRAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS 
 Confidentiali ty in statistical tables. 
 National Central Bureau of Statistics, Stockholm, 1974, 
 
 U. S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS 
 
 Census Bureau unpublished data and special services: policy 
 and delineation. DAD No. 21, Dec. 1970. 
 Bureau of the Census, Washington, D. C. , 1970. 
 
 U. S. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND 
 STATISTICS 
 
 Guidelines for preventing disclosure in tabulations of 
 
 program data. Mim. 
 
 Social Security Administration, Washington, D.C., 1977. 
 
14. 1-1 
 
 14, APPLICATIONS 
 14. 1 United States 
 
 GERSTEL, E. K. , MOORE, R. P., FOLSOM, R. E., and KING, D. A. 
 
 i^cklenburcj county drinking- driving attitude survey 19 70. 
 Report prepared for U. S. Department of Transportation. 
 Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, N. C. , 
 1970. 
 
 GOLDFIELD, E. D. 
 
 Preservation of confidential source records. 
 
 In: FISHBEIN, M. H. , Ed. , The national archives and 
 
 statistical research. 
 
 Ohio University Press, Athens, Ohio, 1973. 
 
 MENDELSSOHN, R. C. 
 
 Databanks and information systems for national statistics. 
 ££0£®^iH3s of the Congress of the International Federation 
 for Information Processing, Ljubljana, Yugoslavia - 1971. 
 North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Nether- 
 lands, 1972. 
 
 ST. PAUL INTEGRATED MUNICIPAL INFORMATION SYSTEM 
 
 A^l-Lsis of the status of data confidentiality. Human 
 Resources Development Subsystem, Task Completion Report 
 (Vol. 6) , 
 
 City of St. Paul, Aries Corporation, University of 
 Minnesotat, March 1971. 
 
 S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS 
 
 Census Bureau unpublished data and special services: policy 
 and delineation. DAD No. 21, Dec. 1970. 
 Bureau of the Census, Washington, D. C. , 1970. 
 
 U. S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 
 
 Dat_a processing at BLS. Report 471. 
 
 Bureau of Labor Statistic, Washington, D. C. , 1976. 
 
 U. S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS 
 
 To know or not to know. Collection and use of racial and 
 ethnic data in federal assistance programs . 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1973. 
 
14. 1-2 
 
 WALLIS, W. A., Chairman 
 
 Federal statistics , Report of the President's Commission. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1971. 2 vols, 
 
14.2-1 
 
 14.2 Other countries 
 
 CARTER, C. F., and ROY, A. D. 
 
 British economic statistics: a report. 
 
 University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge, England, 1954, 
 
 FESSEY, M. C. and BROWNING, H. E. 
 
 Confidentiality of business statistics. 
 
 Statistical News, Central Statistical Office, London, No, 
 
 10, 1970, 10. 1 - 10.6. 
 
 ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY 
 
 Security of the census of population. 
 JO-U-EIliLl °f the Royal Statistical Society, 
 1973, 583-596. 
 
 Ser. B, Vol. 136, 
 
 U.K. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, STATISTICS BRANCH 
 Code of ££ act ice - confidentiality of information. 
 Department of Education and Science, 1974. 
 
15. 1- 1 
 
 Part Two: Related References 
 15. PRIVACY AND RESEARCH 
 15. 1 General References 
 
 ALLEN, D. 
 
 Problems of access to government data, Part I, SSRC 
 Newsletter No. 9, June 1970, 26-28, Part II SSRC Newsletter 
 No. 10, November 1970, 17-20. 
 Social Science Research Council, New York, 1970. 
 
 BORUCH, R. F., and ENDRUWEIT, G. 
 
 Mathematische Methoden zur Sicherung der Vertraulichkeit und 
 Anonymitat von Forschungsdaten (Mathematical methods to 
 assure confidentiality and anonymity of research data) . 
 Zeitschrift fur Soziologie, Vol. 73, 1973, 227-238. 
 
 BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE 
 
 Does research threaten ££ivac_y or does Er.jLva.c_X threaten 
 research? Report of a Study Group. 
 
 British Association for the Advancement of Science, London, 
 June, 1974. 
 
 COBB, S. L. , Chairman 
 
 £e£0£i of the committee on £rivacj_;. 
 
 Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. Ann 
 
 Arbor, Michigan, 1971. 
 
 COMMITTEE ON FEDERAL AGENCY EVALUATION RESEARCH 
 
 £iL2.tectiiL9 individual privacy in evaluation research 
 National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C, 1975. 
 
 CULLITON, B. J. 
 
 Confidentiality: court declares researcher can protect 
 
 sources. 
 
 Science, Vol. 193, 1976, 467-469. 
 
 FEUILLIAN, J. r Esq. 
 
 Every man's evidence versus a testimonial privilege for 
 
 survey researchers. 
 
 Public Opinion 0.uar;__erl_y , Spring 1976, 3 9-50. 
 
15. 1-2 
 
 HILMAR, N. A. 
 
 Anonymity, confidentiality, and invasions of privacy: 
 
 responsibility of the researcher. 
 
 American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 58, 1968, 324-330. 
 
 MAYER, J. E. 
 
 People's imagery of other families. 
 Family. Process, Vol. 6, 19 67, 27-35. 
 
 MULLER, P. J. 
 
 Von Datenschutz und Sicherung der Individualdaten der 
 empirischen Sozialforschung. 
 
 Datenyerarbeitung in S teuer x Wirtschaf t und Rech t, No. 1 , 
 1974, 2-12. 
 
 NEJELSKI, P. 
 
 Researchers in West German survey report difficulty in 
 
 obtaining or protecting confidential data. 
 
 American Sociological Association Footnotes, Nov. 1973. 
 
 NEJELSKI, P. and FINSTERBUSCH, K. 
 
 The prosecutor and the researcher: present and prospective 
 variations on the Supreme Court's Branzburg decision. 
 Social Problems, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1973, 3-21. 
 
 NEJELSKI, P. and LERMAN, N- M. 
 
 A researcher subject testimonial privilege: what to do 
 
 before the subpoena arrives. 
 
 Wisconsin Law Review, No. 4, 1971, 1085-1148. 
 
 NEJELSKI, P., and PEYSER, H. 
 
 A researcher's shield statute: guarding against the 
 
 compulsory disclosure of research data. 
 
 In: RIVLIN, A., Ed., Protecting individual privacy, in 
 
 evaluation research. 
 
 National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C. , 1975, 
 
 B1-B86. 
 
 SCHOENFELDT, L. F. 
 
 Data archives as resources for research, instruction, and 
 
 policy planning. 
 
 American Psychologist, Vol. 25, 1970, 609-616. 
 
15.1-3 
 
 SHILS, E. A. 
 
 Social inquiry and the autonomy of the individual. 
 
 IN: LERNER, D., Ed., The human meaning of the social 
 
 sci en ces . 
 
 Meridian Books, New York, 1959, 114-157. 
 
 STREIB, G. F. 
 
 Privacy in the research interview: issues related to design, 
 
 field tactics and analysis. 
 
 Journal of Comparative Family. Studies, 1973, 276-285. 
 
 TILLERY, D. 
 
 Seeking a balance between the right of privacy and the 
 
 advancement of social research. 
 
 In: WILLI NGH AM, W. W. , Ed. , Invasion of privacy in research 
 
 a nd testing 
 
 Journal of Edu ca tional Meas u re ment ^Supplement) , Vol. 4, 
 
 Spring 1967, 11-16. 
 
 WARE, W. H 
 
 Privacy: the private sector and soc iety 's needs, P-5414. 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1975. 
 
 WESTIN, A,. F. 
 
 Science, privacy, and freedom: issues and proposals for the 
 1970 , s. Part II - Balancing the conflicting demands of 
 privacy, disclosure and surveillance. 
 Columbia Law Review, Vol. 66, 1966, 1205-1253. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. 
 
 Science, privacy, and freedom: issues and proposals for the 
 
 1970's. Part I - The current impact of surveillance on 
 
 privacy. 
 
 Columbia Law Review, Vol. 66, 1966, 1005-1050. 
 
 WILLINGHAM, W. W. , Ed. 
 
 Invasion of privacy in research and testing. 
 
 Journal of Educational Measurement, (Supplement), Vol. 4, 
 
 1967, 1-31. 
 
15. 1-4 
 
 WILLIS, M. 
 
 Designing for privacy. 
 
 Ekistics, Vol. 17, Jan. 1964, 47-52. 
 
15. 2-1 
 
 15.2 Social Research 
 
 AUKRUST, 0. and NORDBOTTEN, S. 
 
 Files of individual data and their potentials for social 
 
 research. 
 
 Journal of the International Associa tion for Research in 
 
 Income and Wealth Income, Series 19, 1973, 189-201. / 
 
 BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES SURVEY COMMITTEE 
 
 The potentials of large-scale social research. 
 
 Ch. 7 in: The behavioral and social sciences: outlook and 
 
 needs. 
 
 Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1969. 
 
 BISCO, R. L. 
 
 Social science data archives: a review of developments. 
 American Political Science Review, Vol. 60, 1966, 93-109, 
 
 BISCO, R. L. 
 
 Role of computerized archives for the social sciences and 
 
 humanities. 
 
 Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, Vol. 
 
 43, Book 1, 1969, 211-248. 
 
 BISCO, R. L. 
 
 Data basest computers, and the social sci ences. 
 Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1970. 
 
 BORUCH, R. F. 
 
 ACE research and the confidentiality of data. 
 £E22£f|din.3s of the Social Statistics Section - 1969, 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D.C., 1969, 
 412-417. 
 
 BORUCH, R. F. 
 
 Assuring confidentiality of response in social research: a 
 
 note on strategies. 
 
 The American Sociologist, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1971, 308-311. 
 
15.2-2 
 
 BORUCH, R. F. 
 
 Security of information processing - implications for social 
 
 research. 
 
 A FI PS Conference Proceedings, Vol. 41, Fall Joint Computer 
 
 Conference. 
 
 AFIPS Press, Montvale, N. J., 1972, 425-433. 
 
 BORUCH, R. F. 
 
 Strategies for eliciting and merging confidential social 
 
 research data. 
 
 Pol icy Sciences, Vol. 3, 1972, 275-297. 
 
 Also in: NEJELSKI, P. Ed., Social re search in conflict with 
 
 k§L*L and ^thics. 
 
 Ballinger, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1976. 
 
 BORUCH, R. F. 
 
 Relations among statistical methods for assuring 
 confidentiality of social research data. 
 Social Science Research, Vol. 1, 1972, 403-414. 
 
 BORUCH, R. F. 
 
 Problems in research utilization: use of social experiments, 
 experimental results and auxiliary data in experiments. 
 Critical Human Behavioral Research Issues in Social 
 Intervention Programs, Annals of the New York Academy of 
 Sciences, Vol. 218, June, 1973, 56-72. 
 
 BORUCH, R. F. 
 
 Procedural and statistical mechanisms for assuring 
 
 confidentiality of social research data. 
 
 In: ESER, A., and SHUMANN, R. , Eds., Fors chunq in Konf likt 
 
 lit B-6cht und Ethik 
 
 Verlag Ferdinand Enke, Stuttgart, 1975. 
 
 BORUCH, R. F. and CECIL, J. S. 
 
 Methods for assuring confidentiality. Research records and 
 
 researcher use of archival records. 
 
 In: Proceedings of the Second Midwest Conference on 
 
 Conf identiaity of Health and Social Science Records^ Where 
 
 law Ethics and Clinical Issues meet. 
 
 University of Illinois, Chicago, 1976. 
 
15.2-3 
 
 BORUCH, R. F., and ENDRUWEIT, G. 
 
 Mathematische Methoden zur Sicherung der Vertraulichkeit und 
 Anonymitat von Forschungsdaten (Mathematical methods to 
 assure confidentiality and anonymity of research data) . 
 Zeiischrift fur Soziologle, Vol. 73, 1973, 227-238. 
 
 CAFROLLY, J. D. , and KNERR, C. R. 
 
 Report of the APSA confidentiality in social science 
 
 research data project. 
 
 Political Science, Summer 1975, 258-261. 
 
 COBB, S. L. , Chairman 
 
 Re por t of the committee on privacy. 
 
 Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. Ann 
 
 Arbor, Michigan, 1971. 
 
 DALENIUS, T. and KLEVMARKEN, A., Ed. 
 
 P§£scma_I integrity and the need for data in the social 
 sciences. Proceedings of a symposium, March 15-17, 1976. 
 Swedish Council for Social Science Research, Stockholm, 
 1976. 
 
 DONNISON, D., Chairman 
 
 Survey n research and pri va cy. Report of a working party. 
 Social and Community Planning Research, London, 1973. 
 
 ESER, A. Ed. 
 
 law in conflict with social research. 
 Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, 1976. 
 
 FEIGE, E. L., and WATTS, H. W. 
 
 Protection of privacy through roicrg^aggregation, Mim. 
 
 report. 
 
 Social Systems Research Institute, University of Wisconsin, 
 
 Madison, Wisconsin, 1967. 
 
 FEIGE, E. L., and WATTS, H. W. 
 
 Protection of privacy through macroaggregation. 
 
 In: BISCOE, R. L. Ed., Data bases^ computers and the social 
 
 sciences 
 
 John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1970. 
 
15.2-4 
 
 FORM, W. H. 
 
 Field problems in comparative research: the politics of 
 
 distrust. 
 
 In: ARMER, M, and GRIMSHAW, A. D. , Eds., Comparative social 
 
 £§. search^, l^thodolocjical problems and strategies. 
 
 Wiley, New York, 1973, 83-113. 
 
 HALPERN, B. 
 
 The Israeli commune. Privacy and the collective life. 
 Modern Review, Vol. 3, 1, 1949. 
 
 HOFFERBERT, R. I. and CLUEB, J. M. , Eds. 
 
 Social science data archives: applications and potential. 
 American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 19, 1976, 318-488. 
 
 ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE and THE 
 CHICAGO CRIME COMMISSION 
 
 A study of organized crime in Illinois. 
 
 Illinois Law Enforcement Commission, Chicago, Illinois, 
 
 1971. 
 
 JANSON, C-G. 
 
 Longitudinal studies and their need for data. 
 
 In: DALENIUS, T. and KLEVMARKEN, A., Eds., Personal 
 
 integrity and the need for data in the social sciences 
 
 Proceedings of a symposium, March 15-17, 1976. 
 
 Swedish Council for Social Science Research, Stockholm, 
 
 1976. 
 
 JUSTER, F. T. 
 
 Microdata, economic research, and the production of economic 
 
 knowledge. 
 
 In: AMERICAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, Papers and Proceedings, 
 
 Vol. 60, No. 2, 1970. 
 
 LAND, F. F. 
 
 Survey archive data banks. 
 
 Social Science Research Council Newsletter, November 13, 
 
 1971. 
 
 Social Science Research Council, New York, 1971. 
 
15.2-5 
 
 NEJELSKI, P., Ed. 
 
 Social research in conflict with law and ethics. 
 
 Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 
 
 1976. 
 
 ORCUTT, G. H. , WATTS, H. W. , and EDWARDS, J. B. 
 Data aggregation and information loss. 
 The American Economic Review, Vol. 58, 196 8, 773-787. 
 
 0YEN, 
 
 Social research and the protection of privacy: a review of 
 the Norwegian development. 
 
 Acta S_oci.ologica. Journal of the Scandinavian Sociological 
 Association, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1976, 249-262. 
 
 RIVLIN, A., Chairman. 
 
 Protecting individual .privacy, in evaluation research. 
 National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. 1975. 
 
 RUGGLES, R., Chairman 
 
 E*LEort of the committee on the preservation and use of 
 
 economic data to the Social Science Research Council 
 
 Social Science Research Council, New York, 1965. 
 
 Also in: U. S. CONGRESS. HOUSE: Committee on Government 
 
 Operations. Special Subcommittee on Invasion of Privacy: The 
 
 computer and the invasion of privacy. Hearings before the 
 
 Special Subcommittee. 89th Cong., 1st sess. June and 
 
 September 1965, and 2nd sess., May 1966. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1966. 
 
 RUGGLES, R. 
 
 On the needs and values of data banks. 
 Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 53, 1968, 211-245. 
 
 RUGGLES, R. and RUGGLES, N. D. 
 
 The role of microdata in the national economic and social 
 
 accounts. 
 
 Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1975, 203-216. 
 
 
15.2-6 
 
 STEINBERG, J., and COOPER, H. C. 
 
 Social security statistical data, social science research, 
 
 and confidentiality. 
 
 Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 30, Oct. 1967, 3-15. 
 
 SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL 
 
 l££0£t of the committee on the prese rv ation and use of 
 economic data to the Social Science Research Council. 
 Social Science Research Council, New York, 1965. 
 
 WARWICK, D. P. 
 
 Social scientists ought tc stop lying. 
 Psychology, Today,, February 1975, 38, 40, 105, 106 
 
15.3-1 
 
 15.3 Behavioral Research 
 
 ALEXANDER, L. 
 
 Protection of privacy in behavioral research, 
 Lex et Scientia, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1967, 34-38. 
 
 ALEXANDER, T. 
 
 Social controls and the individual: a psychological analysis 
 of the invasion of privacy. 
 Intellect, Vol. 103, 1974, 41-44. 
 
 BORUCH, R. F. 
 
 ACE research and the confidentiality of data. 
 Proceedings of the S ocia 1 Statistics Section - 196 9, 
 American Statistical Association, Washington, D.C. , 1969, 
 412-417. 
 
 BORUCH, R. F. 
 
 Educational research and the confidentiality of data. 
 
 Aa.C-.li Research Reports, Vol. 4, No. 2. 
 
 American Council on Education, Washington, D. C. , 1969. 
 
 BORUCH, R. F. 
 
 Educational research and the confidentiality of data: A case 
 
 study. 
 
 Spcioloai of Education, Vol. 44, No. 1, 1971, 59-85. 
 
 BORUCH, R. F. 
 
 Maintaining confidentiality of data in educational research: 
 
 a systemic analysis., 
 
 American Psjycho log. is t , Vol. 26, 1971, 413-430. 
 
 EORUCH, R. F,. 
 
 Problems in research utilization: use of social experiments, 
 experimental results and auxiliary data in experiments. 
 Critical Human Behavioral Research Issues in Social 
 Intervention Programs, Annals of the New York Academy of 
 Sciences, Vol. 218, June, 1973, 56-72. 
 
15.3-2 
 
 CAPLAN, N. and NELSON, S.D. 
 
 On being useful: the nature and 
 psychological research on social problems. 
 American Psychologist , Vol. 28, 1973, 199-211 
 
 consequences of 
 
 CLARK, K. E., Chairman 
 
 Privacy and behavioral research. Preliminary summary of the 
 
 report of the panel on privacy and behavioral research. 
 
 American Psychologist, Vol. 22, No. 5, 1967, 371-376. 
 
 Also in: Science, Vol. 155, 1967, 535-538. 
 
 CLARK, K. E. 
 
 Privacy and behavioral research. Panel on privacy and 
 
 behavioral research. 
 
 International Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 5, 1968, 496-502. 
 
 CONRAD, H. S. 
 
 Clearance of questionnaires with respect to "invasion of 
 privacy", public sensitivites, ethical standards, etc. 
 American Psychologist, Vol. 22, 1967, 356-359. 
 
 PANEL ON PRIVACY AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH. 
 
 Preliminary summary of the report of the Panel on Privacy 
 
 and Behavioral Research. 
 
 American Psychologist, Vol. 22, No. 5, May 1967, 345-349. 
 
 REUBHAUSEN, 0. M. , and BRIM, 0. G. , Jr. 
 Privacy and behavioral research. 
 Columbia Law Review, Vol. 65, 1965, 1184-1211. 
 
 RIVLIN, A., Chairman. 
 
 Protect inq individual privacy in evaluation research. 
 National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. 1975. 
 
 SHAH, S. A. 
 
 Privileged communications, confidentiality, and privacy: III 
 
 privacy. 
 
 Professional Psychology, Vol. 1, 1970, 243-252. 
 
15.3-3 
 
 SIMMONS, D. S. 
 
 Invasion of privacy and judged benefit of personality test 
 
 inquiry. 
 
 Journal of General Psychology, Vol. 79, 1968, 177-181. 
 
 S. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL- 
 
 Division of Behavioral Sciences. Committee on Information 
 
 in the Behavioral Sciences. 
 
 Communication systems and resources in the behavioral 
 
 sciences. Publication No. 1575. 
 
 National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C., 1967. 
 
 U. S. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT. OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND 
 TECHNOLOGY. 
 
 Privacy and behavioral research. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1967. 
 
 WEINBERGER, J. A. and MICHAEL, J. A. 
 
 Federal restrictions on educational research. A status 
 report on the Buckley Amendment and the Freedom of 
 Information Act. 
 Educational Researcher, Vol. 5, No. 11, 1976, 3-8. 
 
15. 4-1 
 
 15.4 Medical Research 
 
 ACHESON, E. D. 
 
 Medical record linkage. 
 
 Oxford University Press, London, 1967. 
 
 BOFUCH, R. F. and CECIL, J. S. 
 
 Methods for assuring confidentiality. Research records and 
 
 researcher use of archival records. 
 
 In: Proceedings of the Second Midwest Conference on 
 
 Conf identiaity of Health and Social Science Records^ Where 
 
 Law Ethics and Clinical Issues meet. 
 
 University of Illinois, Chicago, 1976. 
 
 CHEESEMAN, E. A., and BUTLEP, A. R. 
 
 Personal identification on medical records with particular 
 
 reference to Northern Ireland. 
 
 Report No. RLU 4, Northern Ireland Medical Record Linkage 
 
 Research Unit 
 
 Queen's University, Belfast, 1972. 
 
 CLOSSON, W. G. , Jr., and others 
 
 Confidentiality in psychiatry and psychotherapy. 
 Cal._ Med^, Vol. 113 1970, 12-15. 
 
 CONFERENCE ON USE OF COMPUTERS IN CLINICAL MEDICINE 
 Right of privacy and medical computing. 
 Datamation, Vol. 16, 1970, 173-181. 
 
 EKSTEIN, P. and CAPUTH, E. 
 Keeping secrets. 
 
 In: GIOVACCHINI, Ed., Tactics and techniques of 
 psychoanalytic psychotherapy. 
 Science House, New York, 1972. 
 
 FREED, R. N. 
 
 Legal aspects of computer use in medicine. 
 
 Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 32, 1967, 674-706. 
 
15.4-2 
 
 FREED, R. N. 
 
 Legal structure for a national medical data center. 
 BULR, Vol. 49, 1969, 79-94. 
 
 GABRIELI, E. R. 
 
 Right of privacy and medical computing. 
 Datamation, April 1970, 173-178. 
 
 GOODSTADT, M. S. and GRUSON, V. 
 
 The randomized response technique: a test on drug use. 
 Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 70, 
 1975, 814-818. 
 
 KING, F. W. 
 
 Psychology in action: anonymous versus identifiable 
 questionnaires in drug usage surveys. 
 American Psv.c ho loq i s t , Vol. 25, 1970, 982-985. 
 
 LASKA, E. M. and BANK, R. , Eds. 
 
 Safeguarding psychiatric privacy.. 
 Wiley and Sons, New York, 1975. 
 
 LUETGART, M. J. and ARMSTRONG, A. H. 
 
 Methodological issues in drug use surveys: anonymity, 
 
 recency, and frequency. 
 
 International Journal of Addiction, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1973, 
 
 6 83-689. 
 
 LUGER, R. M. 
 
 The ordeals of confidentiality. 
 Phvsician^s World, Vol. 1, 1974, 23-30, 
 
 MARINER, A. S. 
 
 The problem of therapeutic privacy. 
 £sy_chiatri, Vol. 30, 1967, 60-72. 
 
 McNAMARA, R. M., and STARR, J. R. 
 
 Confidentiality of narcotic addict treatment records: a 
 
 legal and statistical analysis. 
 
 Columbia University. Law Review, Vol. 73, 1973, 1579-1612. 
 
15.4-3 
 
 NEWCOMBE, H. B. , KENNEDY, J. M. , AXEORD, S. J., and JAMES, A. P. 
 Automatic linking of vital records. 
 Science, Vol. 130, 1959, 954-959. 
 
 SPRINGARN, N. D. 
 
 Confidentiality. Report of the conference on 
 confidentiality of health records, Key Biscayne, Florida, 
 November 6-9, 1974. 
 American Psychiatric Association, Washington, D. C. , 1975. 
 
 U. S. COOPERATIVE HEALTH STATISTICS SYSTEM 
 
 Proceedings of the workshop on p riv acy and confidentiality 
 March 3-5, 1976, Atlanta, Georgia. 
 Moshman Associates, Inc., Washington, D.C. 
 
 WAGNER, G. and NEWCOMBE, H. B. 
 
 Record linkage. Its methodology and application in medical 
 data processing. 
 
 H§ihods of Information in Medicine - Methodik der 
 Information in der Medizin, Vol. 9, No. 2, 197 0, 121-138. 
 
 WATSON, A. S. 
 
 Levels of confidentiality in the psychoanalytic situation. 
 Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 20, 
 1972, 156-176. 
 
15.5-1 
 
 15.5 Other Areas 
 
 CARLSON, R. 0. 
 
 Issue of privacy in public opinion research. 
 Public Opinion Quarterly/ Vol. 3, Spring 1967, 1-8. 
 
16. 1-1 
 
 16. PRIVACY AND ADMINSTR ATI VE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 
 16.1 General References 
 
 CARY r F. T. 
 
 IBM's guidelines to employee privacy. 
 
 Harvard Business Review, Sept-Oct. 19 76, 82-90, 
 
 DEMITRIADES, P. B. 
 
 Administrative secrecy and data privacy legislation. 
 Journal of Systems Management, Vol. 27, October 1976, 24-29 
 
 DUEKER, K. J. 
 
 Data sharing and confidentiality in urban and regional 
 
 planning. 
 
 In: RICKERT, J. E. , Ed., Urban and regional information 
 
 systems for social programs 
 
 Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio, 1967. 
 
 KAUFFMAN, M. P. 
 
 Welfare and the right to privacy: applicants rights. 
 £es Ipsa Loguitur, Vol. 25, 1972, 107-113. 
 
 MAGRAW, D. B. 
 
 State- federal cooperation to attain confidentiality of data. 
 The Bureaucrat, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1972, 368-376. 
 
 MAYER, J. E. 
 
 People's imagery of other families. 
 Family Process, Vol. 6, 1967, 27-35. 
 
 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR SOCIAL POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. 
 
 A new l2°JS. 3-i confidentiality in social welfare services. 
 New York, 1973. 
 
 STEINBERG, J. 
 
 Some observations on linkage of survey and administrative 
 record data- DHEW PUB. NO. (SSA) 74-11750. 
 
 Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D. 
 C. , 1973. 
 
16. 1-2 
 
 STEWART, V. R. 
 
 Problems of confidentiality in the administration of 
 
 personal case records. 
 
 The American Archivist, Vol. 37, No. 3, 1974, 387-398. 
 
 WARE, W. H 
 
 Privacy.: the private sector and society _'s needs, P-5414, 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1975. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. 
 
 Science, privacy, and freedom: issues and proposals for the 
 
 1970's. Part II - Balancing the conflicting demands of 
 
 privacy, disclosure and surveillance. 
 
 Columbia Law Review, Vol. 66, 1966, 1205-1253. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. 
 
 Science, privacy, and freedom: issues and p-roposals for the 
 
 1970's. Part I - The current impact of surveillance on 
 
 privacy. 
 
 Columbia Law Review, Vol. 66, 1966, 1005-1050. 
 
16.2-1 
 
 16.2 Criminal Justice and Law Enforcement 
 
 COHEN, R. E. 
 
 Nixon administration weighs restrictions on use of criminal 
 
 history data banks. 
 
 National Journal Reports., vol. 5, 1973, 1599-1607. 
 
 COHEN, R. E. 
 
 Justice report/protection of citizens: privacy becomes major 
 
 federal concern. 
 
 National Journal Reports, 10 December 1974, 1521-1530. 
 
 GATES, A. L. 
 
 Arrest records--protecting the innocent. 
 Tulane Law Review, Vol. 48, 1974, 629-648. 
 
 ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE and THE 
 CHICAGO CRIME COMMISSION 
 
 K stud.y oj: organized crime in Illinois. 
 
 Illinois Law Enforcement Commission, Chicago, Illinois, 
 
 1971. 
 
 LONGTON, P. A. 
 
 Constitutional law - maintenance and dissemination of 
 records of arrest versus the right to privacy. 
 Way_n_e Law Review, Vol. 17, 1971, 995-1006. 
 
 NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND 
 GOALS 
 
 Criminal Justice Systems. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1973. 
 
 PROJECT SEARCH STAFF, COMMITTEE ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY 
 
 Security, and privacy considerations criminal history 
 illf °£IB.ation systems, Technical report No. 2. 
 
 California Crime Technological Research Foundation, 
 Sacramento, California, 1970. 
 
 ROSENFELD, A. R. 
 
 Security and privacy of criminal justice information 
 
 systems. 
 
 State Government, Vol. 47, Winter 1974, 37-41. 
 
16.2-2 
 
 SHAPPLEY, W. L. 
 
 Branded: arrest records of the unconvicted. 
 Iississi£2i L§w Journal, Vol. 44, 1973, 928-946. 
 
 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS CENTER 
 
 RlLX&£I and record keeping in criminal just ice:, a 
 bibliography . 
 
 Office of Crime Analysis, Municipal Planning Office, 
 Washington, D- C. , 1975. 
 
 STINCHCOMBE, A. 
 
 Institutions of privacy in the determination of police 
 
 administrative practice. 
 
 American JouiMi 2l Sociology, Vol. 59, 1963, 150-160. 
 
 U. S. CONGRESS. HOUSE. 
 
 Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee No. 4. 
 Security, and .privacy, of criminal arrest records 
 Hearings, 92d Congress, 2d session, on H. R. 13315. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1972. 
 
 U. S. CONGRESS. HOUSE. 
 
 Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Civil Rights 
 
 and Constitutional Rights. 
 
 Dissemination of criminal justice information 
 
 Hearings, 93d Congress, on H. R. 188, H. R. 9783, H.R. 
 
 12574, H. R. 12575. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1974. 
 
 CONGRESS. SENATE. 
 Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Constitutional 
 Rights. 
 
 Cri mi nal justice data banks. Hearings, 93d Congress, 2d 
 session on S. 2542, S. 2810, S. 2963, and S. 2964. 2 Vols. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D, C, 1974. 
 
16.3-1 
 
 16.3 Schools and Colleges 
 
 AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION 
 
 UsersJ_ Manual^ ACE Hicjher Education Data Bank. 
 
 ACE Research Reports, Vol. 4, No. 1 , 1969. 
 
 American Council on Education, Washington, D. C. , 1969. 
 
 LEWIS, E. , and WARMAN, R. E. 
 
 Confidentiality expectations of college students. 
 Journal of College Student Personnel, Vol. 1, 1964, 7-11 
 
 NATIONAL ACCREDITATION COUNCIL FOR AGENCIES SERVING THE BLIND AND 
 VISUALLY HANDICAPPED 
 
 Confidentiality and the school: a new outlook symposium. 
 
 The New Outlook for the Blind, Vol. 67, No. 2, Feb. xx1973, 
 
 49-65. 
 
 NUGENT, F. A. 
 
 Confidentiality in college counseling centers. 
 Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1969, 872-877. 
 
 RIOUX, J. W. and SANDOW, S. A. 
 
 Children^ parents^ and school records. 
 
 National Committee for Citizens in Education, Columbia, 
 
 Maryland, 1974. 
 
 RUSSELL SAGE FOUNDATION. 
 
 Guidelines for the coll ect ion, ma intenance and dissemination 
 
 of £.UEi! records. 
 
 Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1970. 
 
 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE 
 Privacy rights of parents and students. 
 
 Federal Register, Vol. 40, No. 3, January 6, 1975, Part 
 III, 1208-1216. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1975. 
 
 WEINBERGER, J. A. and MICHAEL, J. A. 
 
 Federal restrictions on educational research. A status 
 report on the Buckley Amendment and the Freedom of 
 Information Act. 
 Educational Researcher, Vol. 5, No. 11, 1976, 3-8. 
 
16. 4-1 
 
 16.4 Health Care 
 
 ACHESON, E. D. 
 
 Medical record linkage. 
 
 Oxford University Press, London, 1967. 
 
 AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION 
 
 Position statement on the need for preserving confiden- 
 tiality of medical records in any health care system. 
 American Journal of Psychiatry., Vol « 128 * No • 10 ' 1972, 169. 
 
 AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION 
 
 "Confidentiality Report of 
 
 Confidentiality of Health Records 
 
 November J.974._ 
 
 American Psychiatric Asso- ciation, Washington, D.C 
 
 the Conference on 
 JS^l Biscay.ne.t Florida^ 
 
 1974. 
 
 BARAN, P. 
 
 Remarks on the question of privacy raised bv. the automation 
 
 of mental health records. P-3523. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1967. 
 
 BEGGS-BAKER, S. , NICK, W. V., CHASE, R. C, KELLER, M. D. and 
 VALLBONA, C. 
 
 Individual privacy considerations for computerized health 
 
 information systems. 
 
 ledical Care, Vol. 12, 1974, 75-84. 
 
 BENNETT, C. C. 
 
 What price privacy. 
 American Ps icho loc[i s t , Vol 
 
 22, 1967, 371-376 
 
 CURRAN, W. J., STEARNS, B., and KAPLAN, H. 
 
 Privacy, confidentiality and other legal considerations in 
 
 the establishment of a centralized health-data system. 
 
 New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 281, July 31, 1969, 
 
 241-248. 
 
 CURRAN, W.J., LASKA, E. M., KAPLAN, H. , and BANK, R. 
 
 Protection of privacy and confidentiality. Unique law 
 protects patient records in a multistate psychiatric 
 information systems. 
 Science, Vol. 182, 1973, 797-802. 
 
16.4-2 
 
 FREED, R- N. 
 
 Legal structure for a national medical data center. 
 BULR, Vol. 49, 1969, 79-94. 
 
 McNAMARA, R. M. , and STARR, J. R. 
 
 Confidentiality of narcotic addict treatment records: a 
 
 legal and statistical analysis. 
 
 Columbia University Law Review, Vol. 73, 1973, 1579-1612. 
 
 NOBLE, J. H., Jr. 
 
 Protecting the public's privacy in computerized health and 
 welfare information systems. 
 Social Work, Vol. 16, 197 1, 35-41. 
 
 OLAFSON, F., FERGUSON, A., JR., and PARKER, A. W. 
 
 Confi de ntiality^ a guide for neighborhood health centers. 
 Neighborhood Health Center Seminar Program Monograph Series 
 No. 1. 
 Pisani Printing Co., San Francisco, California, 1971. 
 
 SPRINGARN, N. D. 
 
 Confidentiality. Report of the conference on 
 confidentiality of health records, Key Biscayne, Florida, 
 November 6-9, 1974. 
 American Psychiatric Association, Washington, D. C. , 1975. 
 
 U. S. COOPERATIVE HEALTH STATISTICS SYSTEM 
 
 Proceedings of the workshop on privacy and confidentiality 
 March 3-5, 1976, Atlanta, Georgia. 
 Moshman Associates, Inc., Washington, D.C. 
 
 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE 
 
 Confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient register 
 
 federal Register, Vol. 40, No. 127, July 1, 1975, Part IV, 
 
 27802-27821. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, 1975. 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 Legislat ive iss ues surrounding the confidentiality of health 
 
 records, P-53 55. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1975. 
 
16.4-3 
 
 WAPE, W. H. 
 
 Privacy aspects of health statistics. P-5619. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1976. 
 
 WARE, W. H. 
 
 Federal and state regulations concerning the p_rivacy_ of 
 
 health care data. P-57 83. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1977. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. 
 
 Computers^ health record s, and citizen rights. NBS Monograph 
 
 157. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. , 1976. 
 
 WESTIN, A. F. with Isbell, F. , Ed. 
 
 A 2Q.H.9.1 analysis of citizen rights issues in health data 
 
 sy_stems. NBS Special Publication 469. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. , 1977. 
 
16.5-1 
 
 16.5 Credit Industry 
 
 FOER, A. A. 
 
 The personal information market: an examination of the scope 
 
 and impact of the fair credit reporting act. 
 
 L212.1§. LiLH Students Consumer Jour n al, Vol. 2, 1974, 37-138. 
 
 GELLMAN, H. S. 
 
 Electronic b ank ing systems and their effects on privacy. A 
 study by the Privacy and Computer Task Force. Department of 
 Communications/Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
 GELLMAN, H. S. 
 
 Electronic banking systems and their effects on privacy. A 
 study by the Privacy and Computers Task Force, Department of 
 Communications/Department of Justice. 
 Information Canada, Ottawa, Undated. 
 
 U. S. CONGRESS. HOUSE. 
 
 Committee on Government Operations. Special Subcommitttee on 
 Invasion of Privacy. 
 
 Commercial credit bureaus^ Hearings before the Special 
 Subcommittee. 90th Cong., 2nd sess. , March, 1968. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1968. 
 
 WESTERMEIER, J. T., Jr. 
 
 The privacy side of the credit card. 
 
 American University Law Review, Vol. 23, 197 3, 183-207. 
 
16.6-1 
 
 16. 6 Other Areas 
 
 STERN, L. C. 
 
 Medical information bureau: the life insurer's databank. 
 Rutgers Journal of Computers and the Law, Vol. 4, 1974, 
 1-41. 
 
 U. S. PRIVACY PROTECTION STUDY COMMISSION 
 Federal tax return confidentiality. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1976 
 
17. 1-1 
 
 Part Three: Additional References 
 
 17. PERIODICALS 
 
 17.1 Periodicals: Names and Addresses 
 
 ACCESS REPORTS. A BI-WEEKLY NEWSLETTER ON FREErOM OF INFORMATION 
 AND PRIVACY. 
 
 2626 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. 
 
 Washington, D. C. 20037. 
 
 COMPUTER SECURITY 
 
 Forty-Three Boston Post Road/West Main Street. 
 Northboro, Mass. 01532. 
 
 COMPUTERS AND PEOPLE 
 
 815 Washington St. 
 Newtonville, Mass. 02160,. 
 
 COMPUTERWORLD 
 
 797 Washington St. 
 Newton, Mass. 02160. 
 
 EDP ANALYZER 
 
 925 Anza Avenue. 
 
 Vista, California 92083,. 
 
 PRIVACY JOURNAL 
 
 P. 0. Box 884U. 
 Washington, D. C. , 20003. 
 
17.2-1 
 
 17.2 Selected Issues 
 
 THE BUREAUCRAT 
 
 National Capitol Area Chapter, American Society for Public 
 
 Administration 
 
 Vol. 5, No. 2, 1976. 
 
 Contents: 
 
 O'NEILL, H. V. The Privacy Act of 1974: introduction and 
 overview 
 
 WARE, W. H. and PARSONS, C. W. Perspectives on privacy: a 
 progress report 
 
 BEDELL, R. P. The Privacy Act: the implementation at 
 first glance 
 
 O'NEILL, H. V. and FANNING, J. P. The challenge of 
 implementing and operating under the Privacy Act in the 
 largest public sector conglomerate - HEW 
 
 SNYDER, D. P. Privacy - the right to what? 
 
 COLUMBIA HUMAN RIGHTS LAW REVIEW 
 
 Columbia University, New York 
 Vol. 4, No. 1, Winter 1972. 
 
 Contents: 
 
 MILLER, A. R. , Computers, data banks and individual 
 privacy: an overview. 
 
 ERVIN, S. J., Jr., The first amendment: a living thought 
 in the computer age. 
 
 KATZENBACH, N. deB. , and TOMC, R. W. , Crime data centers: 
 the use of computers in crime detection and prevention. 
 
 ASKIN F. , Surveillance: the social science perspective. 
 
 BAKER, M. A., Record privacy as a marginal problem: the 
 limits of consciousness and concern. 
 
 FLANNERY, J. P., Commercial information brokers, 
 
17.2-2 
 
 EDP ANALYZER 
 
 The debate on information privacy: parts 1-2. 
 
 EDP Analyzer, Vol. 13, Nov. 1975, 1-13; Dec. 1975, 1-14. 
 
 FEDERAL BAR JOURNAL, 
 
 The Federal Bar Association, Washington, D. C. 
 
 Vol. 34, Fall 1975. 
 
 Contents: 
 
 BEDELL, R. P. , Government contractors and the initial 
 steps of the Privacy Act. 
 
 BROWN, W,. L., The Government's security declassification 
 and declassification program. 
 
 METZ, D. W. , Privacy legislation: yesterday, today and 
 tomorrow. 
 
 CHILES, L.M., Government in the sunshine. 
 
 INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL 
 Unesco, Paris 
 Vol. 24, No. 3, 1973 
 Contents: 
 
 The legal protection of privacy: a comparative survey of ten 
 countries, by the International Commission of Jurists. 
 Introduction. 
 
 The impact of technological developments on the right to 
 privacy. 
 
 The general law relating to privacy in ten countries. 
 Intrusions into privacy. 
 
 Public disclosure of private information. 
 Conclusions. 
 
 Appendix: Data Protection Act (State of Hessen) . 
 MULLER, P. J. and Kuhlmann, H. H. Integrated information 
 bank systems, social book-keeping and privacy. 
 
 LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 
 
 Duke University School of Law, Vol. 31, Spring 1966. 
 Contents: 
 
 HAVIGHURST. C. C, Foreword 
 
 BEANEY, W. M., Right to privacy and American law. 
 
 KONVITZ, M. R. 
 prelude. 
 
 Privacy and the law: a philosophical 
 
17.2-3 
 
 SHILS, E. , Privacy: its constitution and vicissitudes. 
 
 JOURARD, S. M., Some psychological aspects of privacy. 
 
 NEGLEY. G., Philosophical views on the value of privacy 
 
 KALVEN, H. Jr. , Privacy in tort law - were Warren and 
 Brandeis wrong? 
 
 KARST, K. L. , 'The files 1 : legal controls over the 
 accuracy and accessibility of stored personal data. 
 
 HANDLER, J. R. , and ROSENHEIM, M. K. , Privacy in welfare: 
 public assistance and juvenile justice. 
 
 CREECH, W. A., The privacy of government employees. 
 
 NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 
 
 Northwestern University School of Law, Chica'go, Illinois 
 Vol. 68, 1973-74 
 
 Contents: 
 
 Foreword 
 
 PATNER, M., Preface 
 
 ENGEL, G. L. , Introduction: information disclosure 
 policies and practices of Federal administrative 
 agencies 
 
 An overview of the law governing access to information 
 held by public agencies in the State of Illinois and 
 the City of Chicago 
 
 DIVORSKI S. W. , GORDON, A. C. and HEINZ, J. P., Public 
 access to government information: a field experiment. 
 
 GORDON, A. C, HEINZ, J. P., GORDON, M. T., and DIVORSKI, 
 S. W. , Public Information and public access: a 
 sociological interpretation 
 
 Factors affecting accessibility of information held by 
 publiw agencies: the case of the City of Chicago 
 Building Department 
 
 Access to information in the office of the State's 
 Attorney of Cook County, Illinois 
 
17. 2-4 
 
 The Chicago Board of Education and public access to 
 information 
 
 Access to information in the Office of the Chicago 
 Department of Environmental Control 
 
 Access to information in the office of the Secretary of 
 State 
 
 Access to information in the office of the Cook County 
 Assessor 
 
 Comment. Public access to government-held computerized 
 information 
 
 PRISM 
 
 American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois. 
 
 Vol. 2, No. 6, June 1974 
 
 Contents: 
 
 RENSHAW, C. C, JR., Is privacy obsolete? 
 
 ERVIN, S. J., JR., Civilized man's most valued right. 
 
 MILLER, A. R., A nation of datamaniacs 
 
 WEED, L. L. , and RUMSEY, J. M. , Confidentiality: 
 hindrance or necessity? 
 
 PASCOE, J., MIB: It has 12 million Americans at its 
 fingertips 
 
 FREEDMAN, A. M. , Of special concern to psychiatry . . . 
 
 JACKSON, C. B., Guardians of medical data. 
 
 CPAWSHAW, R. , Gossip wears a thousand masks. 
 
 HOLDER, A. R. , How much would you tell a lawyer? 
 
 WESTIN, A. F., We can't blame everything on the machines. 
 
 PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY 
 
 American Association for Public Opinion Research, Columbia 
 University, New York, New York. 
 Vol. 30, Summer 1966 
 Contents: 
 
 BERELSON, B. , Introductory remarks by the chairman 
 
17.2-5 
 
 SNYDER, B- R. , Privacy in behavioral science research 
 
 BLOUSTEIN, E. J. r The right to privacy: the legal 
 background 
 
 CARLSON, R. 0. , The issue of privacy in public opinion 
 research 
 
 TRIAL 
 
 The Association of Trial Lawyers of America, Cambridge, 
 
 Massachusetts 
 
 Vol. 11, No. 1, January/February 1975. 
 
 Contents: 
 
 Letter from President Gerald R. Ford. 
 
 METZ, D. W., and TRUBOW, G. B, The complexity of privacy. 
 
 JACOBSON, R. S. , A massive blow on the anvil of privacy 
 
 LEA, D., Databank devilry 
 
 GITENSTEIN, M. H., The right to privacy is American... 
 
 KELLEY, C. D. , But so is the right to law and order. 
 
 FREEDMAN, A. M. , Looking over the doctor's shoulder 
 
 PROXMIRE, W. , Consumer credit: privacy the collateral. 
 
 SPAFFORD, J. L., Consumer credit: giving creditors their 
 due. 
 
 SHATTUCK, J. H. F. , Uncovering surveillance 
 
 FRANKEL, J. E. , Who judges the judges? 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW FORUM 
 
 University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, 1971 
 No. 2, 1971 
 
 Contents 
 
 ERVIN, S. J. JR., Privacy and government investigations. 
 
 MILLER, A. R., The dossier society. 
 
 HARRINGTON, M. , Privacy and the poor. 
 
18-1 
 
 18. BIBLIOGRAPHIES 
 
 ABBOTT, R.P., BOONE, L.M., MORVAY, I. M. , and TOKUBO, S. 
 
 h biblio<2ra£h_y on computer operating system security 
 
 The RISOS Project. Prepared for U.S. Atomic Energy 
 
 Commission under contract No. W-7405-Eng-48. 
 
 Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, University of California, 
 
 Livermore, California, 1974. 
 
 AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC MUSEUM ASSOCIATION. LIBRARY. 
 
 Psychiatry, illli! confidentiality.! an annotated bibliography. 
 American Psychiatric Museum Association, Washington, D. C. , 
 1974. 
 
 ANDERSON, R. E., and FAGERLUND, E. 
 
 Privacy and the computer: an annotated bibliography. 
 Computing Re vie ws, 1972, 551-559. 
 
 DUGGAN, M. A. 
 
 Computer utilities — social and policy implications: a 
 
 reference bibliography. 
 
 Computing Reviews, October, 1968, 631-644. 
 
 DUGGAN, M. A. 
 
 ■L^w &Q& the computer^ a KWIC bibliography. 
 Macmillan Information, New York, 1973. 
 
 FLAHERTY, D. H. and HANIS, E. H. 
 
 Bibliography from the project Privacy and Access to 
 
 Government Microdata for Social Science Research. 
 
 The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada, 1975. 
 
 HARRISON, A. 
 
 1!l§ ££obJ.em of E£ivacy_ in the computer agej_ an annotated 
 
 bibliography, Vol. 2, RM-5 49 5/1-PR/RC . 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1969. 
 
 HAPPISON, A. 
 
 The ££oblem of privacy in the computer age:, an annotated 
 
 bibliography. RM-54 95-PR/RC 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1967. 
 
18-2 
 
 HSIAO, D. K. , DENICOFF, M., and BERGART, J. G. 
 
 AH annotated and cross-referenced bibliography on computer 
 security and access control in computer systems. 
 Department of Computer and Information Sciences, The Ohio 
 University, Columbus, Ohio, 1972. 
 
 HUNT, M. K. and TURN, R. 
 
 Privacy and security in databank systems:, an annotated 
 
 bi bl ioorraphy , 19 70-1973, R-1361-NSF. 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1974. 
 
 LAMOREUX, S. 
 
 2k§ £i3ll t of privacy - a bibliography - 7J years 
 
 1890-1961. 
 
 Department of Journalism, Washington State University, 
 
 Pullman, Washington, 1962. 
 
 LATIN, H. A. 
 
 Privacy., A selected bibliography and topical index of social 
 
 science materials. 
 
 Rothman, South Hackensack, New Jersey, 1976. 
 
 LIU, YUNG-YING. 
 
 ££ivacy and security in computer systems. 
 A bibliography. LC Science Tracer Bulletin. 
 Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., 1974. 
 
 RAND 
 
 h bibliography of selected Rand publications. Privacy in 
 
 the computer a cje . 
 
 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, June 1974. 
 
 SCHERF, J. A. 
 
 Computer and data security^ a comprehensive annotated 
 bibliography. MAC TR-122. 
 
 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 
 Massachusetts, 1974. 
 
 SEIPP, D. J. 
 
 Pfi^^cy and disclosure regulation of information systems. A 
 
 bibliographic survey. 
 
 Publ. P-75-8, Program on Information Technologies and Public 
 
 Policy. 
 
 Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1975. 
 
18-3 
 
 SMITH, S. C. 
 
 Bibliography. The rights of ££ivacyj_ sej.ect.ed writings of 
 
 the last decade (1958-1968) . Mim. 
 
 Yale University Library, New Haven, Connecticut , 1 968. 
 
 SOLLITTO, S., and VEATCH, R. M. 
 
 Bibliography of society/ ethics and the life sciences. 
 
 The Hastings Center, Institute of Society, Ethics and the 
 
 Life Sciences, Hastings-on-Hudson, N.Y., 1974. 
 
 U. S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. 
 
 IS.dexes to survey methodology literature. Technical Paper 
 
 No- 34. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1974. 
 
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE 
 
 R§cords x computers and the rights of citizens. Report of the 
 
 Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data 
 
 Systems 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1973. 
 
 U. S. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 
 
 Controlled accessibility. Bibliography, NBS Technical Note 
 
 780. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1973. 
 
 WAGNER, G. and NEWCOMBE, H. B. 
 
 Record linkage. Its methodology and application in medical 
 data processing. 
 
 Methods of Inf prmation in Medicine - Methodik der 
 Information in der Medizin, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1970, 121-138. 
 
 WALLIS, W. A., Chairman 
 
 Inderal statistics, Report of the President's Commission. 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1971. 2 vols. 
 
 WARE, W. H. , Chairman 
 
 Record Sj, computers and the rights of citizens. 
 
 Report of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated 
 
 Data Systems. 
 
 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, 1973. 
 
18-4 
 
 YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 
 
 Bibliography The ricjht of privacy^ selected writin£s of the 
 
 last decade^ J1958-.1 9681^ 
 
 Yale University Library, New Haven, Connecticut. Undated. 
 
 *U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1978 0-261-2 39/1107 
 
"t"Pf*Kinitf*£ll ^" ne t ' t ' es I istecl below are available in printed copies or on microfiche. The date in parentheses following the 
 
 lc ^ r ■■***■■ title indicates year of publication. Copies of recent papers may be reviewed and/or ordered at district offices 
 
 PdpGTS of the Department of Commerce located in principal cities throughout the United States. Additional infor- 
 
 mation, including prices, may be obtained by writing to Subscriber Services (ASD), Bureau of the Census, 
 Washington, D.C. 20233. 
 
 No. 1. 
 
 No. 2. 
 
 No. 
 
 3 
 
 No. 
 
 4 
 
 No. 
 
 5 
 
 No. 
 
 6 
 
 No. 
 
 7 
 
 No. 
 
 8 
 
 No. 
 
 9 
 
 No. 
 
 10 
 
 No. 
 
 11 
 
 No. 
 
 12 
 
 No. 
 
 13 
 
 No. 
 
 14 
 
 No. 
 
 15 
 
 No. 
 
 16 
 
 No. 
 
 17 
 
 No. 
 
 18 
 
 No. 
 
 19 
 
 The Sample Survey of Retail Stores: A Report on 
 Methodology (1953) 
 
 Description of the Sample for the Monthly Retail 
 Trade Report (unnumbered revision) (1955) 
 
 Accuracy of Census Statistics With and Without 
 Sampling (1960) 
 
 Farm Population, 1880-1950 (1960) 
 
 The Post Enumeration Survey: 1950 (1960) 
 
 Tests and Revisions of Bureau of the Census Methods 
 of Seasonal Adjustments (1961) 
 
 The Current Population Survey Reinterview Program, 
 Some Notes and Discussion (1963) 
 
 The Current Population Survey, A Report on 
 Methodology (1963) 
 
 Trends in the Income of Families and Persons in the 
 United States: 1947-1960 (1963) 
 Reconciliation of the 1958 Census of Retail Trade 
 with the Monthly Retail Trade Report (1963) 
 
 Population Trends in the United States: 1900 to 
 1960(1964) 
 
 Response Errors in Collection of Expenditures Data 
 by Household Interviews: An Experimental Study 
 (1965) 
 
 Estimating Trading-Day Variation in Monthly 
 Economic Time Series (1965) 
 
 Sampling Application in Censuses of Population and 
 Housing (1965) 
 
 The International Standard Industrial Classification 
 and the U.S. Standard Industrial Classification (1965) 
 
 The X-1 1 Variant of the Census Method II Seasonal 
 Adjustment Program (1967) 
 
 Present Value of Estimated Lifetime Earnings (1967) 
 Trends in the Income of Families and Persons in the 
 United States: 1947 to 1964 (1967) 
 Changes Between the 1950 and 1960 Occupation and 
 Industry Classification (1968) 
 
 The Current Population Survey Reinterview Program, 
 January 1961 through December 1966 (1968) 
 
 No. 20. Correlation Between United States and International 
 Standard Industrial Classifications (1969) 
 
 No. 21. Characteristics of America's Engineers and Scientists: 
 1960 and 1962(1969) 
 
 No. 22. Measures of Overlap of Income Distributions of White 
 and Negro Families in the United States (1970) 
 
 No. 23. The Position of United States in World Commodity 
 
 Exports in 1968 (1970) 
 No. 24. The Annual Survey of Manufactures: A Report on 
 
 Methodology (1971) 
 No. 25. Demographic Computer Library (1971) 
 
 No. 26. 1970 Occupation and Industry Classification System 
 Showing Sources (1972) 
 
 No. 27. Sampling Applications of the 1970 Census 
 
 Publication, Maps, and Public Use Summary Files 
 (1972) 
 
 No. 28. From the Old to the New 1972 SIC for Establish- 
 ments (1972) 
 
 No. 29. Scientific and Technological Development Activities 
 of the Census (1973) 
 
 No. 30. Census County Division, Past and Future (1973) 
 
 No. 31. Consistency of Reporting Ethnic Origin in the Cur- 
 rent Population Survey (1974) 
 
 No. 32. Standards for Discussion and Presentation of Errors 
 in Data (1974) 
 
 No. 33. Characteristics of Persons in Engineering and Scientific 
 Occupations: 1972 (1974) 
 
 No. 34. Indexes to Survey Methodology Literature (1974) 
 
 No. 35. Family (Money) Income: 1947 to 1971 : Summarizing 
 Twenty-Five Years of a Summary Statistic (1974) 
 
 No. 36. Census Bureau Programs to Measure Consumer Pur- 
 chase Expectations: 1959-1973 (1974) 
 
 No. 37. The Census Bureau: A Numerator and Denominator 
 for Measuring Change (1975) 
 
 No. 38. Comparison of Persons of Spanish Surname and Per- 
 sons of Spanish Origin in the United States (1975) 
 
 No. 39. Guide for Local Area Population Projections (1977) 
 
PENN STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES 
 
 U.S. Department 
 of Commerce 
 BUREAU OF THE CENSUS 
 Washington, D.C. 20233 
 
 Official Business 
 
 ti|ji;i>iai i uuiui'Oidll 
 
 Rate— Book I 
 COM-202 
 
 • A#r * ■• If- in n "'" ne t ' t ' es listed below are available in printed copies or on microfiche. The date in parentheses following the 
 WUllvllllJ title indicates year of publication. Copies of recent papers may be reviewed and/or ordered at district offices 
 DdDGTS 0T tne Department of Commerce located in principal cities throughout the United States. Additional 
 
 information, including prices, may be obtained by writing to Subscriber Services (ASD), Bureau of the Census, 
 
 Washington, D.C. 20233. 
 
 No. 
 
 1. 
 
 No. 
 
 2. 
 
 No. 
 
 3. 
 
 No. 
 
 4. 
 
 No. 
 
 5. 
 
 No. 
 
 6. 
 
 No. 
 
 7. 
 
 Raw Materials in the United States Economy: 
 1900-52 (Preliminary) (1954) 
 
 The Role of the 1954 Census of Manufactures in 
 Overcoming Problems of Industry Data (1956) 
 
 Tract Data Compared for a 25-Percent Sample and a 
 Complete Census (1956) 
 
 Sampling in the 1950 Census of Population and 
 Housing (1956) 
 
 Occupational Trends in the United States: 1900 to 
 1950(1958) 
 
 Raw Materials in the United States Economy (1964) 
 
 Papers Presented at the Census Tract Conference, 
 December 29, 1958 (1959) 
 
 No. 8. Materials on the Preparation and Conduct of the 
 U.S.S.R. All-Union Population Census of 1959 
 (1959) 
 
 No. 9. Historical Comparability of Census Manufactures 
 Industries: 1929-1958 (1959) 
 
 No. 10. Papers Presented at the Census Tract Conference, 
 December 29, 1959 (1960) 
 
 No. 11. Papers Presented at the Census Tract Conference, 
 August 25, 1960(1960) 
 
 No. 12. Papers Presented at the Census Tract Conference, 
 August 28, 1961 (1962) 
 
 No. 13. Papers Presented at the Census Tract Conference, 
 September8, 1962(1962) 
 
 No. 14. The Spectral Analysis of Economic Time Series 
 (1963) 
 
 No. 15. Methodology and Scores of Socioeconomic Status 
 (1963) 
 
 No. 16. Procedural Report on the 1960 Censuses of Population 
 and Housing (1963) 
 
 No. 17. Papers Presented at the Census Tract Conference, 
 September 5, 1963 (1964) 
 
 No. 18. The Measurement of Performance Potential in Manu- 
 facturing Establishments (1965) 
 
 No. 19. Tests of Use of Post Office Resources to Improve 
 Coverage of Censuses (1965) 
 
 No. 20. Industry Classification and Sector Measures of In- 
 dustrial Production (1965) 
 
 No. 
 
 21 
 
 No. 
 
 22 
 
 No. 
 
 23 
 
 No. 
 
 24 
 
 No. 
 
 25 
 
 No. 
 
 26 
 
 No. 
 
 28 
 
 No. 
 
 29 
 
 No. 
 
 30 
 
 No. 
 
 31. 
 
 A Spectral Study of "Overadjustment" for Sea- 
 sonality (1965) 
 
 Papers Presented at the Census Tract Conference, 
 December 29, 1964 (1965) 
 
 Spectral Analysis and Parametric Methods for Sea- 
 sonal Adjustment of Economic Time Series (1965) 
 
 Self-Enumeration as a Method for the 1970 Census 
 of Housing (1966) 
 
 Measuring the Quality of Housing (1967) 
 
 Changes in the Structure of Manufacturing Employ- 
 ment (1968) 
 
 No. 27. Methodology of Consumer Expenditures Survey 
 (1968) 
 
 Metropolitan Area Definition (1968) 
 
 Survey Applications of Social Psychological Ques- 
 tions (1969) 
 
 Raw Materials in the United States Economy: 
 1900-1966(1970) 
 
 Price Variation in New FHA Houses: 1959-1961 
 (1971) 
 
 Pretests and Dress Rehearsals of the 1970 Census of 
 Population and Housing: A Procedural History 
 (1972) 
 
 An Estimate of A Quasi-Stable Age-Sex Distribution 
 for Ghana in 1960(1972) 
 
 Investigation of Census Bureau Interviewer Char- 
 acteristics, Performance, and Attitudes: A Summary 
 (1972) 
 
 Raw Materials in the United States Economy: 
 1900-1960(1972) 
 
 Response Variance in the Current Population Survey 
 (1972) 
 
 Who's Home When (1973) 
 
 Economic Censuses of the United States: Historical 
 Development (1973) 
 
 Population and Housing Inquiries in U.S. Decennial 
 Censuses, 1790-1970 (1973) 
 
 Studies in Occupational and Industrial Classification 
 (1974) 
 
 No. 32. 
 
 No. 
 
 33 
 
 No. 
 
 34 
 
 No. 
 
 35 
 
 No. 
 
 36 
 
 No. 
 
 37 
 
 No. 
 
 38 
 
 No. 
 
 39 
 
 No. 
 
 40