B-1180 August 1977 191977 TBX1Q§§&MU§E§??E?§Eiy The The Texas % J. Miller, irector; CONTENTS SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3 METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 FIRM AND INDUSTRY CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAIN ELEVATOR, FEEDMILL, AND FEEDYARD POPULATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Number, Size, and Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6 Utilization Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7 Grain Receipt and Shipment Patterns by Time Periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8 MARKETING CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAIN PRODUCERS . . .. 8 Grain Sorghum and Corn Production Marketed . . . . . . . .. 8 Dimensions of Producer-Originated Grain Procurement Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 SOURCE AND MODAL SPLIT OF GRAIN RECEIVED BY GRAIN ELEVATORS, FEEDMILLS, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AND FEEDYARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9 1g Sources of Feedgrain Receipts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9 REFERENCES ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '4 Modes of Transportation of Feedgrain Receipts . . . . . . . .. 9 APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Summary On a statewide basis, approximately 48 percent of total grain sorghum shipments of Texas grain elevators were to Texas Gulf ports. More than one- half of this export-destined grain sorghum was ship- ped to the Corpus Christi port, while approximately 35 percent went to Houston-Beaumont-Galveston area ports. Texas feedyards, receiving almost 31 per- cent of the grain sorghum shipments of the elevators, ranked as the second most important market outlet. The remainder of the shipments was to out-of-state destinations (6.4 percent) and other Texas elevators and feedmills (13.0 percent). Grain sorghum distribution patterns varied sub- stantially among the subregions of Texas. For exam- ple, in the Northern High Plains, approximately 47 percent of all grain sorghum shipments were to Texas feedyards, while about 21 percent were to Texas Gulf ports. In contrast, in the Gulf Coast area, approximately 95 percent of all grain sorghum ship- ments were to Texas Gulf ports, while less than 3 percent were to Texas feedyards. ' Approximately 62 percent of Texas elevator corn shipments were to Texas feedyards and about 11 percent were for export. The remaining shipments were to Texas elevators and feedmills. Only grain elevators in the Northern High Plains had an exten- sive corn shipment pattern. In general, the destination influenced the selected transportation mode. For example, nearly all shipments to feedyards were by truck. In addi- tion, distance of shipment appeared to significantly influence modal choice — the greater the distance, the greater the likelihood of shipment by rail. For example, most of the grain sorghum and corn ship- ments from the Northern High Plains to Texas Gulf ports were by railroad, but elevators in the Gulf 2 J Sources of Interstate Grain Flows to Elevators and Feedmills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ‘ Modes of Transportation of Interstate Grain Flows» to Elevators and Feedmills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sources of Interstate, Interregion, and Intraregion Grain Flows to Feedyards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Modes of Transportation of Interstate, Interregion‘ Intraregion Grain Flows to Feedyards . . . . . . . . DESTINATION AND MODAL SPLIT OF GRAIN SHIPMENTS FROM ELEVATORS AND FEEDMILLS Destinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..;_ Modes of Transportation of Grain Shipments Destinations of Intraregion and Interregion Ship Modes of Transportation of Intraregion and _ Interregion Shipments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Coast regions shipped nearly all grain to Te -_ ports by truck. ‘ I Texas grain sorghum producers mark proximately 5, 81, and 14 percent of their g ghum directly to cattle feedyards, grain el_ and feedmills, respectively. Corn produc keted approximately 7, 72, and 21 percent off-farm corn marketings to cattle feedyar elevators, and feedmills, respectively. On t age, approximately two-thirds of the grain I and 55 percent of the corn sold by produc? nated within a 10-mile radius of the procurii ity. In general, those regions with denser ~ grain production had a tendency toward? market areas. ‘a On the average, approximately 88, I'i percent of total grain sorghum receipts a, grain elevators originated from producer Texas elevators, and out-of-state sources, tively. Eighty-four percent of the grain eleva; receipts were from producers, while about percent of their corn receipts were from ot elevators and out-of-state sources, respect contrast, approximately 42, 41, and 15 pe grain sorghum receipts of feedmills were fr ducers, other Texas elevators, and out- sources, respectively. Twenty-six percent I feedmill corn receipts were from produce 30 and 43 percent of their corn receipts Texas grain elevators and out-of-state sou f spectively. Texas feedyards received appro 79 percent of their grain sorghum from Te elevators, 14 percent from producers, and 6? from out-of-state sources. Sixty-one percent receipts of feedya rds were from Texas elevate’, 31 percent originated from out-of-state sou I TEXAS FEEDGRAIN FLOWS AND TRANSPORTATION MQDES, I974 Stephen W. Fuller and L. Bruce Knudson* exas is the largest producer of grain sorghum ' United States, annually growing 40-50 percent y’ Nation's total production. Historically, grain um has been Texas’ most valuable grain crop. 4,the aggregate production of grain sorghum alued at $854.9 million and represented ap- ately 50 percent of the total value of the p; grain production‘ (1). In 1974, corn pro- f; in Texas was 73.6 million bushels with an (ted value of $227.4 million and ranked as third most valuable crop (Table 1). e location of sorghum and corn production in . sand the 1969-75 level of grain sorghum prod- for each crop reporting district are shown in 1 and Table 2, respectively. The Northern (plains (Crop Reporting District 1-N, Figure 2) is tently Texas’ largest grain sorghum producing 1nd since 1969 has produced 27-48 percent of late’s total grain sorghum production. The lrn High Plains (Crop Reporting District 1-S) Qnerally ranked as Texas’ second most impor- oduction area — the exception was in 1974 ifthis district ranked fifth. From 1969-73 the rn and Southern High Plains have produced ercent of the State's grain sorghum output. y cklands (Crop Reporting District 4) has his- y, produced 9-13 percent of Texas’ total grain production and has usually ranked as its lost important producing area. In 1974, the ds ranked second in grain sorghum produc- Coastal Bend (Crop Reporting District 8-S) lvely, associate professor and former research assistant, js Agricultural Experiment Station (Department of Ag- -__ Economics). include barley, corn, grain sorghum, wheat, soy- e, oats, rye, and flax seed. third, and the Lower Valley (Crop Reporting District 10-S) fourth. The Northern High Plains (Crop Reporting Dis- trict 1-N), Texas’ largest corn producing area, has been producing an increasing portion of the State's total corn production (Table 3). In 1969, this area produced approximately 41 percent of the State's total production, but in 1974 and 1975, it was re- sponsible for 72.9 and 71.2 percent, respectively. The Southern High Plains has ranked as either Texas’ second or third most significant corn producing area by producing 10-15 percent of the State's total corn output. In 1974, other significant corn producing areas were the South Central District (Crop Report- ing District 8-N), South Texas (Crop Reporting Dis- trict 10-N), Upper Coast (Crop Reporting District 9), and East Texas (Crop Reporting District 5-S). Reliable estimates of regional grain production are available, but little is known regarding grain dis- tribution patterns or utilized modes of transporta- tion. In many situations, individuals or public agen- cies make decisions affecting the production, stor- age, and shipment of grain without adequate infor- mation regarding grain disposition or utilized trans- portation modes. The purpose of this study was to 1) document and measure Texas’ intrastate and interstate grain sorghum and corn distribu- tion patterns 2) determine modes of transportation em- ployed in alternative grain flow patterns 3) measure grain flows among grain handlers, processors and cattle feedyards 4) identify characteristics of the grain handling industry ALL SORGHUM ACRES PLANTED FOR ALL PURPOSES 1074 1 dot = 3,000 acres CORN -ACRES PLANTED FOR ALL PURPOSES 1974 1 dbt = 1,000 acres Figure 1. Location of Texas sorghum (top) _ (bottom) production. '3 L DALLAM S-‘EFVIN MN UKTIOJ~ISRtt - F59"? -———— - s -< i u HARTJv MOORE i "“"gg“:i Riiii‘; nun . ‘ Y ———+ a o ‘ c ~w row: Cliéfini 5:» name VMRTHERN HIGH PLAINS @ : * . ~~ _ g y . NORTHERN LOW PLAINS "(Mill IAPRCLAS-ER 51s."; ma“ ~ ~1‘ l ‘ CROSS TIMBERS I ' BLACKLANDS Mitts _AMB mus i:_:~c north totni ‘O‘RD':J‘LG“*W\(>4ITA l L4, l -_ ‘ c: 75L ‘DC n -.::\t&~,.»aocc\ $135k tug: K n5. v.9‘ gnu“ mo,“ k “ tuna“ {OOv-E ‘thaw rnm ~ MM.‘ n-Evczn 80w‘; , THERN HIGH PLAINS 1-sl 4 . L 3 4 W , . u 1 l , ’ » W Wilh} um: GARZA ~s~v 3:31:01! nous uc». w-ss eutou Cottm wNY uov~~s E g ' “ xii’ ~-- It“ EAST TEXAS . k Qfllfillt- PLLO p‘l‘§i “a‘~y mLLk, - ‘ “O00 UP§I4UE v us Juvscu- nee-i suns = - - m“, stwutlsl rwvo ‘ “U; y“ n‘ so“ ti‘ , nave “ ‘ " _ m» ' ZANTT 5Q “ ' “Wu 1o so 2 I 5" _ HERN LOW PLAINS " " t. r I "' . U " i unvnnn LOVING muntiq gcwgq .D\~~D OLASS- Svil- go‘; ‘ _ 533mg“ BOSQuE “ILL k CHER Sana‘ can‘ t-Iuf, UIIMLS s0killliquOli n unison J's“ “Koo “mum, M u‘ oocues U _ nufispsy“ ‘NLBERSON *‘1t, _ % CLENIII ;-'O~‘ 2s I 1~E ‘ ~ _ 1:,“ H MILL5 9 as i t REEVES- k ‘ “H” Rm.“ mo“ 6"“ 3 " _ 5;“ Gnu“ cuts 40-4 “GU90” luau-u w‘ u> i‘; In 9‘.A ;Al’l§j o.‘ ‘Y Q ~,Iy TS -—" l!“ so.‘ - E C , S $0,; i1 k“ H’ M ‘ ‘Maw. Pctut wvtil c‘? O ' " I ‘L M . - '5‘; C“ S CROCNY‘ ML§ON bL‘~O ‘umuum u“ S “Mug?” i’ 5 3t T \ 52'1"‘ i_ w“ -. z L SUYYQN x-MQLI q ‘mvv “‘RN~ 6 g swap,‘ “uc ‘rlAvug LEI “hm; ‘s aoum “ _ v; an a _ _ 11053: w" Leann "m"; 1E5 I‘ 3 ‘saw. ““5 _ I :5 lflnsou wililxswl ‘M "an Emufi an ‘MQMACOIAAL 1mm. ““"‘ ‘~"" ' “““‘5 C- nus E‘~°‘.‘ GQAOA COLDEAPO Iggy f 7 w" Gov Bum . s v‘ \~\E~ .blL:-\§ MEPINA DhAl _ ‘nkl wuwuw mm‘ o PLATEAU "'*$°" ‘m 9 UPPER CQAST a‘ A\-\_-\ zac Aflggos‘ xAlkiS mum‘ “unto: Q Got-m I r (A,- ' vwt .1 Sin.‘ $31.“ ‘ sec m, SOUTHCENTRAL w ‘u T K 5A~ ‘S PlYRvCi J4 W E a a Q ; NUE‘E5 w L "" l COASTAL BEND JQCIG SOUTH TEXAS 0- ncau mm“; Moo-s nun I ‘f? {-122 O- “ A ‘(Avtsiw A». LOWER VALLEY Figure 2. Crop reporting districts in Texas. The 3 is a schematic representation of the aire-measured grain flows between Texas firs, Texas cattle feedyards, Texas grain y, Texas feedmills, Texas Gulf ports and lte locations. The arrowed lines connecting “ed groups or institutions indicate direction t OWS. Methodology T, rincipalsource of data for this study was a _ ensive questionnaire mailed to grain 7,, feedmills, and cattle feedyards.’ number of cases, the feedmill and grain iélpopulations included identical firms and . That is, even though the firm was a commercial feed manufacturer, it also ciea grain merchandiser. Because it was im- ito identify the extent of each activity, any firm appearing in both populations was placed in the feedmill population. Consequently, some feedmills acted as receivers and shippers of whole-grain. Use of several procedures and statistical tests assured that the returned questionnaires were representa- tive of the various populations. “The grain elevator population was obtained from (1) the 1973-74 Texas Department of Agriculture's publication, Texas Grain Warehouses, (2) the 1973-74 Annual Directory of the Texas Grain and Feed Association, and (3) the 1974 list of warehouses eligible to store grains under the Commodity Credit Corporation pro- grams. The feedmill population was obtained from the 1973-74 Annual Report of Commercial Feed Manufacturers, published by the Texas Feed and Fertilizer Control Service. The cattle feedyard population was obtained from the 1974 Texas Feedlot Directory and the Annual Report of the Texas Cattle Feeders Association. See Table 4 for response rate of the respective populations. TEXAS CATTLE FEEDYARDS 1‘ 4; TEXAS E TEXAS GRAlN TEXAS GULF PRODUCERS Y ELEVATORS PORTS C ‘b R QUT_ TEXAS OF—STATE # FEEDMILLS L Y Figure 3. Schematic representation of major grain flows. To facilitate measurements of intrastate grain flows, the surveyed firms related magnitude of re- ceipts or shipments to each of seven subregions of Texas. Each subregion represented one or several Crop Reporting Districts (See Figure 4). The Crop Reporting Districts were grouped into seven study areas and named for use throughout the publica- tion: Crop Reporting District 1-N — Northern High Plains; Crop Reporting District 1-S —- Southern High Plains; Crop Reporting Districts 2-N, 2-S, and 3 — Rolling Plains; Crop Reporting Districts 4, 5-N, and 5-S — East Texas; Crop Reporting Districts 8-N, 8-S, and 9 -— Gulf Coast;\Crop Reporting Districts 10-N NORTHERN HIGH PLAINS . Service and includes all structures equipp and 10-S — Rio Grande Plains; and Crop Districts 6 and 7 — Pecos-Plateau. Firm and Industry Characte‘ of Grain Elevator, Feedmi and Feedyard Population? Number, Size, and Location Off-farm grain storage. capacity increi 154 million bushels in 1950 to 919 million 1963. From 1963 to 1975, total off-farm stor r ity trended downward to a low of 71 » bushels. In 1974 and 1976, off-farm stora “mated at 752 million bushels (2). The of ,_ age estimate is calculated by the Statistical ing grain and all facilities not currently i’ equipment for handling grain is intact. I Number and aggregate storage ca operating inland grain elevators by alterni age capacities for each of the designated s E are presented in Table 5. These storage -1_ i. SOUTHERN HIGH PLAINS Crop Reporting District 1-S PECOS- + PLATEAU l Crop Reporting Districts 6 and 7 Figure 4. Seven Texas study regions. Crop Reporting Districts —> 10-N and 10-S § <— Crop Reporting District l-N ROLLING PLAINS ‘ Crop Reporting Districts f,‘ l ZN’ 23 and 3 Crop Reporting Distr’ 4, 5-N and 5-S Q) m ~52 i F’ j 5 Q\ Crop Reporting Districts 8-N, 8-S and 9 an e RlO GRANDE PLAINS Q A ‘it include capacities 0f port elevators, or oilmill processors, feedyards, rice mills, grain elevators licensed to man- fimmercial feeds, or non-operating stor- res. The Northern High Plains contains I ely 50 percent of Texas’ grain elevator acity and one-third of its grain ‘elevators. lern High Plains and East Texas regions about 16 percent of Texas’ elevators “r represent about 3O percent of its stor- . Approximately 61 and 18 percent of storage facilities belonged to the less Q al to 500,000-bushel storage capacity and do 1,000,000-bushel storage capacity (n, respectively. These two elevator size represented 79 percent of all facilities and (about 30 percent of the State's total grain rage. Therefore, nearly 70 percent of the 'n elevator storage capacity was concen- ftng 21 percent of all facilities that had greater than 1 million bushels. I i I cud i yistribution of grain elevator storage ll‘ sizes differed among regions (Table 5). hern High Plains, approximately 44 per- grain elevators were in the smallest stor- category, whereas in the Rolling Plains, Plains and Pecos-Plateau regions about 1 of all facilities were in this size group. In e High Plains had greater numbers of the larger size categories than other re- . ,4 =1‘. erage elevator storage capacity within elevator storage capacity classification for a is shown in Table 6. The average grain F rage capacity in the Northern High Plains ted at 1.18 million bushels, the largest of The statewide average grain elevator acity was calculated to be 0.78 million j?’ engaged in commercial feed man- fighave substantially smaller storage than do grain elevators. The average jd 0.13 million bushels of grain storage _ able 7). " mber of commercial feed manufacturing heir average storage capacity, and total Opacity per region (Table 7) show that i; mercial feed manufacturing industry is led in the East Texas and Gulf Coast re- se two regions contain nearly two-thirds ustry's commercial feed manufacturing a addition, the East Texas and Gulf Coast mpose about 42 percent of the storage i‘ Texas’ commercial feed manufacturing pproximately 70 percent of the State's feed manufacturing firms have less than hels of storage capacity (Table 10). In con- largest storage size classification l"2,000,000 bushels) contains only 3.8 per- cent of the facilities, but compose approximately 42 percent of the industry's storage capacity. Of Texas’ total feedyard capacity, 64 percent was located in the Northern High Plains in 1974 (Ta- ble 8). The Southern High Plains contained about 8.5 percent of Texas’ total feedyard capacity -- the sec- ond largest capacity of any region. The Texas High Plains (Northern and Southern High Plains) con- tained approximately 47 percent of Texas’ feedyards and nearly 73 percent of its feedyard capacity (Table 8). (See Appendix A for historical data regarding Texas cattle and calves on feed for slaughter.) Utilization Characteristics In 1974 grain elevators and feedmills with smaller storage capacities tended to have higher turnover ratios (the ratios of volume of grain hand- led to volume of storage capacity). Turnover ratios for alternative grain elevator storage capacities are shown in Table 9. As storage capacity increased, the turnover ratio tended to de- crease. For example, the less than or equal to 500,000-bushel storage capacity elevators handled 2.22 bushels of grain per bushel of storage capacity, whereas the over 3 million-bushel size classification handled 0.65 bushels per bushel of storage capacity. On the average, Texas elevators handled 0.92 bushels of grain per bushel of storage capacity. There was also considerable variation in turnover ratios between regions. The highest ratio (3.27) was in the Pecos-Plateau area, where average storage capacity per facility was lowest — 191,309 bushels. The tendency for smaller storage capacity facilities to have higher turnover ratios in the com- mercial feed manufacturing industry is shown in Table 10. On the average, commercial feed pro- cessors with storage capacities of less than or equal to 50,000 bushels received 15.5 bushels of grain per bushel of storage capacity. The largest storage facilities (1,000,001-2,000,000 bushels) had a turnover ratio of 0.6; this ratio corresponds closely to that of grain elevators in this size category. The ratio of fed cattle marketed to one-time feedyard capacity is an estimate of the number of animal units fed per head of feedyard capacity (Table 11). The regional utilization ratios in Table 11 are slightly over-estimated since the numerator of the ratio included all fed cattle marketed, whereas the denominator included only the capacity of those feedyards with greater than or equal to 1,000-head capacity. It is estimated that only 2 percent of the cattle are marketed from yards with less than 1,000- head capacity. Because the distribution of small feedyards ($1,000 head) between regions is not available, no regional adjustments are possible. However, when adjusted, the statewide ratio be- comes 1.22 rather than the tabled 1.25. Grain Receipt and Shipment Patterns by Time Periods Temporal grain receipt and/or shipment pat- terns of the grain elevator, feedmill, and feedyard populations are indicated in Tables 12, 13, 14. The peak temporal receipt patterns at grain elevators are highly correlated with peak-harvest months (Table 12). For example, 38.7 and 43.1 percent of the Northern High Plains grain elevator receipts were in the September-October and November-December time-periods, respectively, this region's grain sor- ghum and corn harvest periods. Fourteen percent of the Northern High Plains grain receipts were during the May-June time period when this region's wheat production was harvested. The Rolling Plains area is primarily a wheat producer and, accordingly, grain elevators received a substantial portion of their re- ceipts during the May-June time period. Eighty-six percent of the grain receipts of Gulf Coast elevators were in July and August, this region's peak grain sorghum harvesting period. Temporal grain shipment patterns of grain elevators varied among regions (Table 12). The per- centage of shipments per time period were relatively even in the Northern High Plains, Southern High Plains, and Pecos-Plateau regions, and relatively un- even in the Rolling Plains, East Texas, Gulf Coast and Rio Grande Plains regions. A possible explanation is the grain's destination. A large portion of the North- ern and Southern High Plains grain shipments was destined to area feedyards which demand feedgrain on a year-round basis, thus causing the relatively even flow throughout the year. The Pecos-Plateau area is a feedgrain deficit region; accordingly, grain elevators ship much of their feedgrain to area feedyards on a year-round basis. In general, the temporal grain receipt and shipment pattern at feedmills corresponds to that at grain elevators except feedmill grain receipts and shipments were more evenly distributed throughout the year than were grain elevator flow patterns (Ta- ble 13). Most feedyards do not have substantial grain storage capacity; therefore, these enterprises tended to receive grain at a nearly constant rate throughout the year (Table 14). The exceptions were the East Texas and Gulf Coast regions, where 51 and 31 percent, respectively, of feedyard grain receipts were in July and August. Marketing Characteristics of Grain Producers In 1974, Texas produced 312.0 and 73.6 million bushels of grain sorghum and corn, respectively. Al- 8 ternative marketing outlets and distance by producers to each marketing outlet va ‘ portance. a I ‘i Grain Sorghum and Corn Production Marketed . @ One of the principal intraregion grain; volves producer transportation of grain to local buyers. Table 15 identifies the ma“ of producer grain sorghum and corn prod l the relative importance of each. In all regi] elevators were the dominant buyers. Th share of producer grain sorghum mark,’ greatest in those regions with the highe production and vice versa. For example, High Plains producers marketed nearly 89 their grain sorghum through grain elevat the Rolling Plains and Pecos-Plateau area f marketed only 54 and 60 percent, respecti Q elevators, although the most important =11 producer corn, generally were less impoi for grain sorghum. In all regions, except Plateau, feedmills were a relatively more destination for producer corn sales than. sorghum sales. '3 Dimensions of Producer- Originated Grain Procurement Are The dimensions of producer-origin. procurement areas are indicated in Tables In the Northern High Plains, approximat; cent of all producer-originated grain sorg nated within a 10-mile radius of its initial (Table 16). In contrast, approximately 59 the corn originated within a 10-mile rad, 17). In general, those regions with a dens. grain sorghum production tended towa market areas; that is, a higher portion of originated within the smaller market radi miles). Conversely, procuring firms in t“ Plains and the Pecos-Plateau regions, t Y producers of grain sorghum, originated f; ‘ portion of their producer-originated rec the smaller market radiuses. In general, procurement areas were larger than the ‘j ghum procurement areas (Table 17). A l='“"-,l- a‘ a} The Northern and Southern High Plait contain a large portion of the State's feed i; try and in 1974 fed about three-cfourths of g production. Feedyards in these regions higher portion of their producer-origi and corn from smaller market areas than elevators or feedmills (Tables 16, 17). a {ource and Modal Split of Received by Grain Elevators, eedmillgs, and Feedyards }. . of Feedgrain Receipts ,1 cers, other Texas elevators, and out-of- _ rces supplied varying portions of grain éfeedmill and feedyard grain sorghum and files 18, 19, 20). Producers were the principal grain sorghum supply for elevators, sup- sproximately 88 percent. Producers, the furce of elevators’ corn supply, provided spercent (Table 18). or storage capacity appeared to influence intage of total receipts from a specific in general, the larger elevators received a portion of their receipts from other This is expected, since the larger facilities lly at locations with transit privileges and lly act as a secondary holder of grain. Fort major terminal market for grain in the East , and in the largest elevator size category bushels storage), nearly all grain sor- eipts were from out-of-state or other Texas Other major secondary grain holders are a the Northern and Southern High Plains, y primary grain assemblers (country in these regions have storage in excess of bushels. ills also received grain sorghum and corn rnative sources (Table 19). In general, Jeceived a smaller percentage of their total iipts from producers or a larger percentage ftal receipts from other sources than did 1 ators in the respective regions. On a 4 basis, 88 percent of elevator grain sor- Eceipts came directly from producers, about 42 percent at Texas feedmills came Lam producers. mills were more dependent on grain especially out-of-state elevators, for w corn than for supplies of grain sorghum generally due to the relative abundance of (duced grain sorghum relative to corn. In iTexas region, a major commercial feed ; ring area, approximately 61 and 98 per- ir respective grain sorghum and corn re- ’ e from other elevators. Sixty-eight per- st Texas feedmill corn receipts originated f-state sources. it elevators and out-of-state elevators were suppliers of feedgrains to the Texas ’ing industry (Table 20). Feedyards in the Plains represented approximately 64 the State's feeding capacity and accord- “Tured approximately 89 and 92 percent of ictive grain sorghum and corn supplies from elevators. This is expected, since feedyards have limited storage capacity and require grain year-round. In general, feedyards were more dependent on out-of-state elevators for corn supplies than grain sorghum supplies. Approximately 31 percent of Texas’ feedyard corn supplies originated from out- of-state elevators but only about 6 percent of the grain sorghum supplies. Modes of Transportation of Feedgrain Receipts The selection of mode of transportation (truck or rail) for the grain sorghum and corn generally was influenced by distance of shipment. All grain obtained directly from producers was delivered by truck (Table 21). Grain received by elevators from other sources — Texas elevators and out-of-state elevators — was shipped by both rail and truck. On a statewide basis, approximately 56 percent of the intrastate grain sorghum shipments among Texas grain elevators were by truck — 44 percent by rail. Approximately two-thirds of the grain sorghum received at Texas elevators from out-of-state sources was transported by the rail- roads. It is estimated that 86 percent of the intrastate corn flow among grain elevators was transported by trucks, while nearly two-thirds of the corn received from out-of-state elevators was truck-delivered (Ta- ble 21). As with grain elevators, all producer-originated grain sorghum and corn received at feedmills was delivered by truck (Table 22). On a statewide basis, approximately 85 percent of the grain sorghum and 83 percent of the corn flowing from Texas elevators to Texas feedmills was truck transported. Approxi- mately 65 percent of the grain sorghum received by Texas feedmills from out-of-state sources was trans- ported by truck, but over 8O percent of the corn was rail transported. All of the out-of-state originated grain sorghum and corn flowing to feedmills in the Southern High Plains, Rolling Plains, Rio Grande Plains, and Pecos-Plateau regions was delivered by truck. In the Northern High Plains, East Texas, and Gulf Coast regions, approximately 82, 83, and 73 percent, respectively, of the out-of-state originated corn was delivered by rail. Most feedyards do not have rail service; thus nearly all grain was delivered to these firms by truck (Table 23). Only the Southern High Plains and Pecos-Plateau region feedyards received a signifi- cant percentage of grain by the rail mode. Southern High Plains feedyards received about 15 and 36 per- cent of their respective Texas elevator-originated grain sorghum and corn by rail. In the Pecos-Plateau region, 100 percent of feedyards’ out-of-state origi- nated grain sorghum was delivered by rail. Sources of Interstate Grain Flows to Elevators and Feedmills Four states are major sources of out-of-state originated grain. On the average, 2.2 percent of the grain sorghum and 9.4 percent of the corn flowing to Texas elevators originated from out-of-state sources. Approximately 15 percent of the grain sorghum and 43 percent of the corn for Texas feedmills had an out-of-state origin. Kansas and Nebraska were the principal sources of out-of-state originated grain sorghum and corn (Tables 24, 25). Approximately 62 percent of that grain sorghum flowing to Texas elevators originated in Kansas, while 75 percent of the corn came from Kansas. Northern High Plains elevators received 69 and 19 percent of their out-of-state originated grain sorghum from Kansas and Nebraska, respectively (Table 24). Feedmills in the East Texas region, a major commercial feed manufacturing area, re- ceived approximately 76 percent of their out-of-state originated grain sorghum from Kansas and 55 and 32 percent of their out-of-state originated corn from Kansas and Nebraska, respectively (Table 25). Modes of Transportation of Interstate Grain Flows to Elevators and Feedmills Out-of-state originated grain sorghum and corn flowing to Texas elevators and feedmills was trans- ported by both truck and rail (Tables 26 and 27). Nearly 57 and 99 percent of the respective grain sor- ghum shipments from Kansas and Nebraska sources to Texas elevators were by railroad. Approximately three-fourths of the Kansas-originated corn but only about 19 percent of the Nebraska-originated corn was delivered to Texas elevators by truck. Sources of Interstate, lnterregion, and lntraregion Grain Flows to Feedyards On a statewide basis, about 80 percent of the grain sorghum and approximately 61 percent of the corn received at Texas feedyards originated at Texas elevators. In addition, 6.4 percent of the grain sor- ghum and approximately 31 percent of the corn originated from out-of-state sources. The percentage of Texas-elevator originated grain sorghum and corn flowing to feedyards from alternative Texas regions is shown in Table 28. For example, 99 percent of that flowing to Northern High Plains feedyards originated from elevators within the same region (an intraregion flow); the other 1 percent came from Southern High Plains 1O grain elevators. In general, if a region ha tial grain sorghum or corn production, .5 of the Texas-elevator-originated grain l elevators within the same region; that is, i, 1' an lntraregion flow. Conversely, if a regi 9' production was small, a large portion of l} elevator originated grain came from elev, different region (an interregion flow). On a statewide basis, Texas feedyard approximately three-fourths of their o _ originated grain sorghum and corn from ble 29). Nebraska, which supplied about 1 was the second most important out-of-sta In most Texas regions, Oklahoma was A supplier of grain sorghum and corn. The f was feedyards in the Rolling Plains, whicj about 13 and 89 percent of their respectill state originated grain sorghum and corn f homa. Modes of Transportation of Interstl lnterregion, and lntraregion Grain Flows to Feedyards Almost all of the Texas elevator and o? originated grain sorghum and corn flowin l.» feedyards was transported by truck (Tabl ‘ chiefly because few feedyards have rail sell Appendix B for the portion of study p‘ 2 i with rail car unloading facilities.) Appro <11 t, a percent of the grain sorghum flowing fro ‘ya High Plains elevators to Texas feedyards delivered (Table 30). Kansas, the princi state feedgrain source, shipped nearly 1.‘ of all Texas feedyard destined grain by tru 31). Destination and Modal Spl} of Grain Shipments from Elevators and Feedmills Destinations The percentage of grain elevator“ ghum and corn shipments to alternative is shown in Tables 32 and 33. On a state “I approximately 48 percent of the grailfi shipped from Texas elevators was destin‘ Texas Gulf ports (Table 32). Over one- export-destined grain sorghum flowed pus Christi port, while approximately on j shipped to Houston-BeaumonHGalvl ports. The Gulf Coast and Rio Grande! gions, major grain sorghum producers, and 43 percent of their respective grai nts t0 the Corpus Christi port. The Northern ins elevators shipped approximately equal of their export-destined grain sorghum to n-Beaumont-Galveston and Corpus Christi nly elevators in the Rio Grande Plains ship- inificant quantities of grain sorghum to the j} ille port. _ as feedyards, receiving nearly 31 percent of evator grain sorghum shipments, ranked as 00nd most important market outlet. The yn and Southern High Plains, major feedgrain and cattle feeding areas, shipped a sub- *5 portion of the region's feedgrain to Texas — 47 percent of the Northern High Plains “percent of the Southern High Plains grain a shipments. (froximately 62 percent of Texas grain gr corn shipments were to Texas feedyards, cipal destination (Table 33). In 1974, North- h Plains grain elevators shipped 11.9 percent f corn shipments to Texas Gulf ports — the fa which indicated corn shipments to this ion. Approximately 5 percent of Northern ins corn shipments were to out-of-state des- u. ator size apparently did not affect grain i t patterns except in the Northern and rn High Plains where smaller elevators a larger portion of their total shipments to xas elevators than did the larger elevators. xpected since smaller elevators are primary lndlers, while larger elevators are secondary lders. sorghum and corn shipments by Texas ls were less than 10 percent of the total v ts made by Texas grain elevators. Grain sor- hipment patterns of feedmills resembled grain elevators, whereas corn shipment pat- i re substantially different (Table 34). Gener- j a small portion of the feedmill corn ship- as to Texas feedyards. In several regions, 1;; shipments had unlisted destinations. l of Transportation Shipments ja statewide basis, approximately 39 percent xas-originated grain sorghum flowing to the -Beaumont-Galveston area ports was trans- _ truck (Table 35). In contrast, nearly three- cjof that moving to the Corpus Christi port k-delivered, while 97.6 percent of the grain receipts at the Brownsville port were truck y. ed because Corpus Christi and Brownsville fginate a large portion of their grain sor- ithin relative proximity of the port. Texas l ranked as the second most important des- i;for Texas elevator grain sorghum shipments ), and trucks transported 97 percent of this flow. lt is estimated that about three-fourths of Texas elevator grain sorghum shipments were by truck. Grain elevators in the Northern High Plains, the largest grain sorghum producing area in Texas, shipped approximately 48 percent (Table 32) of their total grain sorghum shipments to Texas feedyards, and approximately 96 percent of these shipments were transported by truck (Table 35). The second most important destination for Northern High Plains grain sorghum shipments was Gulf ports, and al- most all of this flow (98.5 percent) was transported by rail. Modal splits on grain sorghum shipments from Northern High Plains grain elevators to out-of- state destinations varied substantially. For example, nearly 94 percent of the grain sorghum shipped to California was transported by rail, while 99.6 percent of those shipments to Oklahoma were by truck. Ap- proximately 80 percent of the grain sorghum ship- ped from Northern High Plains grain elevators to other Texas elevators was by truck. ln the major grain sorghum producing areas of the Southern High Plains, East Texas, Gulf Coast, and Rio Grande Plains (Table 35), approximately 90-100 percent of the grain sorghum flowing from grain elevators in these areas to Texas feedyards was transported by truck. As expected, those regions in the proximity of Texas Gulf ports transported a much higher percentage of their export-destined grain by truck than did High Plains elevators. Gulf Coast region elevators shipped 93 percent and 97 percent of their respective export-destined grain sorghum to Houston-Beaumont-Galveston and Corpus Christi ports by truck. In general, the greater the distance of haul, the greater the use of rail trans- portation. Generally, small elevators tended to ship a greater portion of shipments by truck, especially in the Northern High Plains. For example, in this re- gion, the smallest elevators (s 500,000 bushels stor- age) shipped approximately 43 percent of their total Houston-Beaumont-Galveston port-destined ship- ments by truck, whereas the largest elevators (2 3,000,000 bushels storage) shipped less than 1 percent. Smaller elevators, less likely to be located on a rail line, tended to ship a greater percent by truck. On a statewide basis, approximately 62 percent of Texas elevator corn shipments were to Texas feedyards, and trucks transported 95 percent of this flow (Table 36). The truck was the principal transpor- tation mode on all corn flows except those destined for Texas Gulf ports and feedmills. Only Northern High Plains grain elevators made extensive corn shipments to‘ most destinations (Table 33). Modal split on corn shipments to Texas Gulf ports and Texas feedyards was similar to that for grain sor- ghum shipments to these destinations (Table 36). Approximately 99 percent of the corn flowing from Northern High Plains elevators to Texas feedyards was transported by truck, while nearly 100 percent of 11 the corn shipments to Texas Gulf ports were by rail. From 98 to 100 percent of all corn shipments from Northern High Plains elevators to California, Arizona, and Oklahoma were by truck. In general, the modal split on grain sorghum and corn flows from feedmills to alternative desti- nations are analogous to those for grain elevators (Table 37). Destinations of lntraregion and Interregion Grain Shipments A significant portion of Texas grain elevator and feedmill grain sorghum and corn shipments was de- stined for the State's grain elevator, feedyard, and feedmill populations; for example, approximately two-thirds of the grain sorghum from the Northern High Plains elevators was for these destinations (Ta- ble 32). Approximately 79 percent of the Texas- destined grain sorghum shipments from Northern High Plains elevators and feedmills were within the region. The Southern High Plains, Rolling Plains, and East Texas regions received 6.7, 6.4, and 5.1 per- cent Texas-destined grain sorghum shipments, re- spectively, from the Northern High Plains. On a statewide basis, 48.5 percent of Texas-destined grain sorghum shipments from elevators and feedmills within the State went to the Northern High Plains. In all cases, the greatest portion of a region's grain sorghum shipments was destined for the originating region; that is, the greatest flow was an intraregion flow. Except for the Southern High Plains, approximately 66 to 97 percent of the Texas- destined shipments involved an intraregion flow. Approximately 82 percent of Texas-destined corn shipments from the Northern High Plains elevators and feedmills were to that region — an intraregion flow (Table 38). ln all cases, except in the Southern High Plains, the largest Texas-destined corn flows were intraregional. The exception was in the Southern High Plains where approximately three-fourths of the Texas-destined corn shipments were to the Northern High Plains and, accordingly, represented an interregion flow. 12 _truck. Modes of Transportation of lntraregf and Interregion Shipments ..l The modal split on grain sorghum af shipments from Texas elevators and feedmi g seven Texas subregions — the intra-and int l grain flows — is identified in Table 39. Only; cent of the grain sorghum flowing from s" High Plains elevators and feedmills to North Plains destinations was transported by rail,‘ 96.6 percent of this intraregion flow was tranyg by truck. Of the grain sorghum received Northern High Plains from all Texas regio percent was truck delivered. In all-regions, East Texas, over 90 percent of the intraregi" sorghum flows were transported by truck. East Texas area, approximately 84 percent of traregion grain sorghum flow was transpo Acknowledgments For valuable contributions to this study’; thors express appreciation to the fol Raymond Dietrich, Donald Farris, and Department of Agricultural Economics; Owensby, Texas Transportation Institute! Schake, Department of Animal Science, an Smith, Texas Agricultural Extension Servi The authors are indebted to Texa elevator, feedmill, and cattle feeding indu’, their cooperation throughout this study. References 1. Statistical Reporting Service, U.S.D.g Field Crop Statistics, 1969-75. 2. Statistical Reporting Service, U.S.D.f Off-Farm Grain Storage Capacity, 1975. Texas Grain Sorghum and Corn Production and its Share of National Production, I969-75 gf 3 Texas Production as a Percent of U.S. Production Texas Production U.S. Production Sorghum Corn Sorghum Corn Sorghum Corn bu. bu. bu. bu. % g (000) (000) (000) (000) 729,919 6,687,057 309,800 26,268 62.6 0.6 683,571 6,151,938 329,616 36,536 68.2 0.8 875,752 5,661,112 303,006 63,056 36.6 0.8 309,266 5,573,329 319,730 39,560 39-5 Q-7 930,012 5,666,806 617,000 60,800 66.8 1.1 629,222 6,663,631 312,000 73,600 69.6 1 6 758,656 5,766,991 376,600 113,300 69.6 2.0 J gculturai Statistics, U.S.D.A.,Statisticai Reporting Service, 5e75, 13 Table 2. Texas Crop Reporting Grain Sorghum Production by Crop Reporting Districts, 1968-75 a} —9 District 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972, 1973 1979 i (000 bushels) J l—N 127,751 121,399 121,699 195,289 123,899 199,206 101,699§, 1-s 68,909 99,709 52,872 95,771 57,999 73,079 29,353}, 2-N 5,899 9,995 9,226 9,306 5,780 6,925 2,089;; 2-s 12,593 8,289 7,298 10,983 10,618 19,902 6,620§ 3 2,317 1,679 1,059 _ 895 1,181 1,869 1,667 9 9 35,603 29,216 38,835 26,287 31,699 _h5,937 38,5897? 5~N 367 Q95 667 4 1,080 906 693 700% 5-s 1,078 771 1,383 1,939 2,859 1,231 2,739? 69 2,329 1,616 1,313 1,020 1,127 662 308 § 7’ 8,376 5,338 5,036 2,871 3,629 6,090 3,811: 8-N 16,990 17,133 19,831 9,752 16,398 22,182 20,768~€ 8-s 22,067 28,396 31,230 19,580 20,598 29,993 39,960 g 9 9,173 11,692 12,833 11,169 15,966 23,369 29,773 0 IO—N 10,282 9,986 9,811 5,085 10,280, 12,597 10,7199 10's i7,55i 19,291 26,528 23,937 17,996 39,365 33,755 State Total 390,780 309,800 329,626 303,009 319,780 917,000 312,000~§ 14 Q] Texas Field Crop Statistics, U.S.D.A., Statistical Reporting Service, I968-75. (f! i3. Texas Crop Reporting Service, I968-75. 30,530 3/ Texas Field Crop Statistics, U.S.D.A., Statistical Corn Production by Crop Reporting Districts, 1968-75 5/ ifportinga ;6ri¢t 1968 1969 1970 1971 I972 1973 1976 1975 3 (000 6056615) 6,002 10,700 10,350 23,200 22,505 01,530 53,661 80,683 1,988 2,696 3,209 6,626 6,626 6,720 6,982 15,912 58 59 16 01 22 108 236 80 18 66 66 23 7 63 51 162 118 60 66 26 91 36 25 56 0,286 2,050 2,993 1,810 1,206 1,188 893 1,125 609 273 576 000 790 610 071 1,000 1,001 685 928 837 680 708 1,156 627 0 0 30 11 12 52 21 30 638 527 602 885 1,010 1,110 813 1,266 8,103 5,658 7,015 6,335 5,811 6,766 6,963 6,275 51 71 55 02 08 116 102 159 1,808 1,360 2,090 1,759 1,639 1,003 1,576 2,288 731 1,082 1,557 1,236 882 2,362 2,210 2,860 201 1,165 981 1,707 393 030 0531 2,739 %;tai 26,052 26,268 63,056 39,560 60,800 73,600 113,300 15 Table h. Questionnaire Return Rate for Sampled Texas Populations, l97h Additional Returns from Number In Mailed-In Random Telephone Sample Institutions Population Returns Sample Total Grain ' Elevators 638 231 32 263 Cattle Feedyards 269 Q] 76 hl ll7 Feedmills 792 200 so 0 260 TOTALS 1,699 507 I33 eho gf Included few feedyards with less than 1,000 head capacity. 16 .m_oem:Q eo____E mm we on ww_Nm__uw» wwwep +0 >N~uwQwu wmweopm mn_3mNwNm .>~_uwQwu wmweopm $0 m_wew:n eo___mE Rm w>we on mew>en ou_e _mwxm» nmzoem >n:~m .<.Q.m.: nwemm_n:Qe: e< .m_wew:n eom___E ww $0 >N~uwewu wmweoum m>we on nwNwE_Nmw mew; wnew>nww» .>w>e:w __wE wen wm> .>_o>_NuwQmwe .m_wem:n QQ____e MM new eoe__ee Qm Nw nwNwE_Qmm wwz m~m_ new ¢~m_ e_ >N@uwQwu wmweouw neon »_:u mwxwh .>NmuwQwu wmweopm $0 m_mem:e eo~___E mo_ o>we on nwNwE_~mw o>_~w~ewmmeQoe.eom~w~_ewmeo mnwep >e~m:ne_ ___E__o e< nmuwezumo Mp0?’ mQTIZQww mmwf. .>m>._:m —mME ®£u w_> NUQCTFLQHQU mm; U00» _MMU\_QEEOU QLDHUQmHQCME Hweu m_._mEU®®m MO Nfimuwqwu omweoum mnmz|muwpm .nww» _w_uewEEou weapuwwnews om_w Nan mewm_neweuewE emwem mw Now “wee meoNw>w_w e_wem eo m___Enwm» .mnew>nww» .weowmwuoeQ __mE__o eo e_wem noo» .mew>en wu_e .weoNw>w_o Neoe on:_ue_ Hoe on mw_n_uwQwu mmweonm w>on< .mEwemoeQ eompweoqeou Hmnweu >u@noE&wu we» ewne: memwem meopm on w_nwmm_m mwmnoemewz we ~m__ wen new >eo~ume.n eomNwmuomm< nwwe new ewweu wwxmh .>eoNuwemn mwmsoewewz e_wew mwxm» Eoe» nw_nEwmmw wnwn w>oe< \M M MMQ.Q_Q.QNQ M_Q ¢MQ.QQQ.N M. ¢NN.QQQ.M NM QQQ.N_N.NM _Q eMQN.MMQ.MN QQ_ @oN.:~m._~ NQ M__._QQ.QQ .MQ =wm.Qmm.N¢N QQN Q~.uwQwu >~wuwQwu >NmuwQwu >~muwQwu >NmuwQwu >~_uwawu >~_uwQwu >»_uwQwu >NmuwQwu wmweouw wmweoum n wmweoum * omweoum n wmweonm n mmweopw n wmweoum n omweopw w wmweoum n eoNw>m_m wnwnm :wmpw_¢ me_w_e pmwou mwxwh memw_e memw_¢ wemw_¢ lmouwe mneweu o_m »_:u umww me___om em_: eemeunom em_: eewepeoz u |||||||||||.||||...||unluumcOmmmmnnnnunan-.||||||||||||||||||c| <;Q1M1 N.\~¢ ngxme wee Que >Q mveeonwuw »-w eo~w>~_w =e~enw~>_~w=e»~_< >Q me¢~w>~_w@eQ~» .v 1i ., v.1... A a . w. u ..,..w...._,=.,_.....w.,.z , w, 4.x. M,» “w... wm_..,..u..... ..<...._ Amen _ ‘i; “.2, . , . H? .,. w , New .w.¥. .. wen >NMw~QwQ;wQ~.@~m Q~.~Q».QQ<,QQN»ewQeQ%§Qw.we§@M1M U .nmmw _mmULOEEOU mgawumwncme om_m pan wLommvcm:uLmE cmmgm mm pom umcu wLo~m>o_o cmmkm LO m___Euow» .wnLm>umm» mmgomwmuoga ___e__o ;O cmmkm woo» .mL®>LU mum; .mLo~m>w_o ugoq ou:_ucm #0: on mm_pmumQmu mmmkopm o>on< \M Qmm1QQ~ QQm._Q_ QmQ.QQm mQQ.~_~ ~mm.Qm~ QQm.~Q~ ~Qm.mQQ ~Qm.Q~_._ @Q~.@>< QQ_Q@¢ mm~.QmQ.m Q Q w@o.o~:.: ~:w.~¢m.~ Q QQQ.Qmm.Q QQQ.QQ~.m QQQ.QQQ.m m m_Q._~m._ Q mQ_.QQm._ QQ~._~m._ QQQ.QQQ._ QQQ.mQQ._ mmQ.QmQ._ ~_~.QQm._ QQQ.QQQ.m-_QQ.QQQ._ mwm»wwQ mo¢.~Q@ QQQ.Q~m m_Q.QQQ QQQ.Qm~ -Q.Q_~ Q~¢._:@ QQQ.Q_~ QQQ.QQQ._-_QQ.QQm ~@¢.ww_ QQm.QQ_ ~Q~.QQ_ m~m._Q~ QQQ.QQ_ QQQ.~m_ mQm.mQ_ QQ~.mQ~ QQQ.QQmmn Am_m;m:nv Am_w;m:nv Am_o;m:nv Am_m;m:nv Am_w;m:nv Am_m;m:nv Am_m;m:nv Am_m;m:nv Am_m;m:nv mumpw :mm~m_¢ .mcmm_¢ 1 pmmou mmxm» mcmm_¢ mcmm_¢ mcmm_¢ >~_umQmu mmmgouw 1moumm mucmgo »_:w pmmm mc___om Lam: gm“: Lo»m>m_m o_¢ cgonuzow cgwzugoz 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 mcOmmmm 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \m ¢~m_ .¢ommwm >Q >Lomm~mu m~_m Qo~m>w_m cmmgw gumm cmzumz >pmumQmu mmmgogm Loum>m_m mmmLm>< wmpmemumm .w m_nmP 18 éble 7, Estimated Number of Commercial Feed Manufacturing Facilities, 5° and Their Average and Total Storage Capacities by Region, I974 3/ Number Average Total 3 Qf _ Storage Storage ijion Feedmills Capacity Capacity (bushels) (bushels) Lthern High Plains s2 818.188 2182x288 lsnarn High Plains 32 211.819 8.890.288 ijing Plains I06 123,98] ‘3!oh6!S86 €k Texas 287 I2‘9532 3h)879!68h a 60,5, 205 40,258 8,252,880 Grande Plains as 288.980 8.832.888 s-Plateau _7_1_ 113,711» 8,073,898 is TOTAL 788 130,588 102,903,532 §AVERAGE g W-er of commercial feed manufacturing facilities taken from I973-7h 'gnual Report of Commercial Feed directory. Includes all firms licensed ,gr commercial feed manufacture. In many cases, these firms are grain ;jevators which act as grain merchandisers, but, in addition, manufacture jg lrcial feed. Table 8. Head Capacity 1,000-l,999 2aOOO'3a999 haOOO'7>999 8>0OO“]59999 l6,000 + Categories by Region, l97h _§/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Regions - - - - - - - - - ' ' ' ' ' Northern Southern R50 High High Rolling East Gulf Grande Pecos- Plains Plains Plains Texas Coast Plains Plateau l5,000 3,000 ll,000 l5,000 7,000 3,000 5,000 2l,000 6,000 l6,000 l8,000 l8,000 6,000 lA,00O h6,000 29,000 37,000 8,000 27,000 hA,O00 9,000 168,000 37,000 02,000 ,33,000 73,000 ‘26,000 91,000 l,750,000 l92,000 l5l,000 20,000 l8,000 66,000 98,000 2,000,000 267,000 257,000 9A,000 lh3,000 145,000 2l7,000 TOTAL §/ Information provided by Eldon Johnson, Estimated Aggregated Capacity of Feedyards by Alternative Feedyard Size Austin, Texas. 20 ,, Texas Crop and Livestock Reporting Servflj .>Lomm~mu m~_w m_;~ c_;~m3 m;o~m>m_m cmmgm Eogw omcoamoh oz \u .>Lomoumu m~@m mmzp cm;~_2 mLo~m>m_m,c_mLm oz \n .m;owmmuoLQ cmmkmvmww LO mL0>LU mum; .mL0um>®_m “Lou .mLommwuoLQ __o .mwLm>wom» .m__@Evwm» mv:_ucm poc mmou ~_ .m._ .mgo~m>m_o c_mLm >_co mmn:_uc_ \m ~ N»... Ra Q: 2.. S; 8. S. mm. ~aw$>< .632 m? E R U mm. E S. S. 86.25.» m $. D 8.. D; S. 2. 2. Q. OQQ.OQQ.T_QQ.QQQ._ Q. S. i; i; S. m... 1 8. . i. ¢¢¢.Q¢o._-_o¢6¢m 2a gm 3.: fia. £4 _~._ mm. Ea oaoafivl 11 @3523 ommLm>< :mo»m_¢ m:_m_¢ ummou mmxoh wcmm_¢ mc_m_¢ mcwm_¢ >~mumqmu ommhoum 33w -88.. @965 t3 $8 927a 5:. a; .8965 omm cLm:u:om cgmzugoz 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 mcommom 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \m :~m_ .¢o_m@¢ >n momkomuumu uwmm LOum>o_w cmmgu o>_umcLou_< >n >umuwQmu ommgoum mo uE:_0> cu uo_wcm: cmmgo mo oE:_o> mo 0_um¢ voums wMm1;wm;w¥hm \4 Manufacturing Industry, I9? Table l0. Characteristics of Texas‘ Commercial Feed g Ratio oii L Storage % % of % of grain R951 caP3¢ltY 0f all Total Storage Total Grain to Sto{* é (Bushels) Feed Mills Capacity Receipts aft Capacfii 1 5 50,000 70.1 11.0 30.9 s 50,00l—l00,000 8.0 5.9 16.8 6.8®€ 100,001-300,000 10.5 13.9 13.3 300,001-500,000 11.2 111.1 - 9,7 13f. 500,001-1,000,000 3.5 21.0, l6.9 A 1,3€§ 1,000,001-2 ,000 ,000 3. s 112.1 12.11 .6 3/ Includes all.firms licensed for commercial Feed manufacture. In many casii f1rms are grain elevators which act as grain merchandisers, but, in additi? facture commercial feed. 1§ Q] Includes grain sorghum, corn, wheat and soybeans. 22 Fed Cattle Marketings and Estimated Ratio of Fed Cattle Marketed to Feedyard Capacity by Regi0fl, 1974 Average - Number of Fed Ratig of g Fed Cattle Cattle Marketed Fed Cattle Marketed €?n Marketed aj Per Feedyard b/ to Feedyard Capacity c/ lhern High Plains 2,55l,O00 28,989 ]_28 éhern High Plains 379,000 ~I8,9§Q |_h2 lingePlains Texas 91 ,ooo 3 ,6ho _97 ?sCoast l36,000 5,037 _95 fiCrande Plains l8h,000 10,222 ]_27 1;-Plateau 203,000 ' l0,l2S |_]2 Total 3,899,000 16,806 L25 @{verage a 5-p- l@ata obtained from Texas Livestock Statistics l9Jb, Statistical Reporting Service, §.S.D.A. Fed cattle marketed represents total marketings from all size of feedyards. illerage number of fed cattle marketed per Feedyard was obtained by dividing fed iattle marketed by number of feedyards in region. Because number of feedyards with §i< l000 head capacity are not known by crop reporting district and were not ihcluded in number of feedyards in region the tabled average is an overestimate if average marketings per Feedyard. It's estimated that Feedyards with <:lOOO .fad capacity market about 2% of Texas‘ total feed cattle. In which case, the fbled average closely represents marketings from feedyards with over l000 head ‘ipacity. gtio of fed cattle marketed to feedyard capacity obtained by dividing feed cattle frketed per region by feedyard capacity of regions'yards with =>lO0O head. For lge reasons stated above, the ratio is slightly overestimated and is representative M feedyards with 2_l0O0 head capacity. 23 Table l2- Estimated Percent of Grain Elevators Srain Receipts and Shipments by Alternative Time Periods by Region, l97h January March May July September t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 Region February April June August October % % % % % Percent of Total Northern Grain Receipts ,5 ,8 1b,] 2,3 38,7 High Plains Percent of Total Monthly 5hlPments 15.5 12.0 12.6 16.6 15.1 Percent of Total _ Southern Grain Receipts 1,3 ,9 2,7 6,9 h],8 High 3 Plains Percent of Total 1 Monthly Shipments 17.8 11.9 15.7 10.8 21.1 Percent of Total Rolllng Groin Receipts .1 .1 66.0 22.6 6.7 Plalns Percent of Total Monthly Shipments 3.5 2.9 07.9 21.7 13.8 Percent of Total East Groin Receipts 8.9 7.h 27.9 50.1 5.0 Texas Percent of Total Monthly Shipments 12.5 6.6 12.3 no.3 19.7 Percent of Total Gull Groin Receipts .6 1.8 9.6 86.0 1.3 coast Percent of Total Monthly Shipments 14.3 1.0 5.2 no.0 20.8 Percent of Total Rio Groin Receipts 1.0 .3 25.1 72.1 1.0 Grande Pl8lnS Percent of Total Monthly Shipments 2,6 ,3 21,7 63,3 8,3 Percent of Total pe¢O5- Grain Receipts 5.7 10.7 10.0 30.2 27.7 Plateau Percent of Total Monthly Shipments 6,5 lA.A l3.3 l6.3 2b.7 24 Estimated Percent of Feedmills Grain Receipts and Shipments by Alternative Time Periods by Region, l97b January March May July September November to to to to to to February April June August October December % % % % % % Percent of Total Grain Receipts l7.5 l6.5 33.2 fi.5 l3.5 lA.8 Percent of Total Grain Shipments 9.l l0.9 28.6 l0.0 21.8 l9.6 Percent of Total Grain Receipts 5.A l.3 A.5 2.5 30.8 55.5 Percent of Total Grain Shipments l5.0 3.3 8.0 8.6 2b.3 A0.8 Percent of Total Grain Receipts l2.6 9.l 28.1 ll.7 l7.6 20.9 Percent of Total A Grain Shipments ll.6 l2.8 #7.] 3.h 9.l l6.0 Percent of Total Grain Receipts l3.0 ll.5 ll.8 30.9 lh.3 l8.5 Percent of Total Grain Shipments 5.h .5 lA.3 59.9 l0.6 9.3 Percent of Total Grain Receipts ll.A ll.2 l5.0 33.3 lh.6 lh.5 Percent of Total Grain Shipments 3.3 l.l. 6.7 63.6 13.2 l2.l Percent of Total ~ Grain Receipts 0.3 3.2 hl.h Ah.l 3.0 A.0 Percent of Total Grain Shipments A.7 2.A 28.9 fi2.5 lQ.3 7.2 Percent of Total Grain Receipts 2l.h 2l.6 lA.6 l2.9 l3.8 l5.7 Percent of Total Grain Shipments 9.0 l0.7 ll.l ll.9 b0.8 l6.5 p25 Table lh, Estimated Percent of Feedyards Grain Receipts by Alternative Time Periodslaé Region, 197A 0 January March May July September Noéi to to to to to é Region February April June August October Deg; z z z z z N?rthern Percent of Total é Plains rain ecelpts Q 15.8 18.0 18.0 15.3 18.7 1 Southern i High Percent of Total f _ G ' R ' . y. P"=""S ram ewpts 111.8 18.11 111.8 18.7 21.0 1 Rolling Percent of Total S Plains Grain Receipts y .; l5.A l5.9 l6.7 l7.8 l7.A la East Percent of Total if 8 Texas Grain Receipts § l3.7 lA.A l5.2 50.9 3.0 g Gulf Percent of Total ? Coast Grain Receipts Q ll.O l2.0 ll.6 3l.2 l6.l Q Rio Percent of Total Grande G . R . Plains rain eceipts lA.3 l5.0 l5.5 2l.A l9.h Pe¢Q5- Percent of Total Plateau Grain Receipts 18.0 l9.2 l5.2 l5.7 16.2 28 it Estimated Percent of Texas Producers Grain Sorghum and Corn Marketings to Grain Elevators, Feedmills and Cattle Feedyards by Region, 1974 % of % of % of Marketings Marketings Marketings Commodity to Grain Elevators to Feedmi11s to Feedyards Grain Sorghum 88.7 2.h 8.9 Corn 70.5 18.6 6.9 Grain Sorghum 82.5 13.0 .5 Corn 61.7 35.5 2.8 Grain Sorghum 53.6 38.5 7.9 Corn 0.0 100.0 0.0 Grain Sorghum ' 68.7 31.3 0.0 Corn 3.7 96.3 0.0 Grain Sorghum 81.7 15.2 3.1 Corn 1.1 78.1 20.8 Grain Sorghum 75.5 19.9 h.6 Corn 58.h V 23.0 18.6 Grain Sorghum 60.0 1h.2 25.8 Corn 99.6 0.9 0.0 Grain Sorghum 80.7 13.9 g 5.h Corn 71.6 21.5 6.9 27 28 Table ]5_ Estimated Percent of Grain Elevators , Feedmills and Feedyarfi Producer-Originated Grain Sorghum Coming from Alternative 2 Distances by Region, 1975 Firm _ Region Type - - - - — - - — — - Miles - - - - - - - - Q g l0 >10 - 5 2o >20 - 5 30 % % % Z? Ngrthern Grain Elevators 72.7 20.1 5.3 1.; High Feedyards 95.2 5.5 0.5 0.; Plains Feedmills 73-9 ZR-Q 1-7 0-i Region Average 75.9 18.8 5.8 1.3 Sguthern Grain Elevators 62.5 22.5 15.8 0.i High Feedyards 78.1 21.9 0.0 0.; Plains Feedmills 53.1 33.7 10.3 Region Average 62,2 23,8 13,5 05% Rolling Grain Elevators 66.2 19.5 13.9 0.3 Plains Feedyards 32.l 57.0 8.2 2., Feedmills 30.9 33.7 25.5 6.§ Region Average 51.5 28.9 17.5 2. East Grain Elevators 7h,h 2h,7 0.9 0.3 Texas Feedyards 0.0 0.0 0.0 0., Feedmills 53.3 36.0 8.8 1.1 Region Average 67,8 28,1 3,5 0.§ Gulf Grain Elevators 67.8 26A 5.6 l.‘ C9351; Feedyards 18.3 0. Feedmills 58.1 25.2 5.6 22. Region Average 6A.9 25.9 .0 A. R16 Grain Elevators 53.5 32.3 12.1 2.1 Grande FeedYaFd5 Z-8 3-9 61-3 3Z# P1a3n5 Feedmills 28.8 37.5 25.7 9.; Region Average fi6.3 32.1 16.7 'h,§ P8605‘ Grain Elevators h2,h 16,3 01,3 0,6 Plateau Feedyards 28.3 16.7 13.7 lll.3 Feedmills 17.1 51.5 26.5 lh.§% Region Average 35,6 20,0 “ 31,1 13,33 State Grain Elevators 67.3 23.8 7,5 1, Average Feedyards 72.2 11.5 10.3 6. Feedmills 57.2 32.2 11.9 8. Table l7. Estimated Percent of Grain Elevators , Feedmills and Feedyards Producer-Originated Corn Coming from Alternative Distances by Region, 197A Firm Region Type — - - - - - - - - — - - Miles - - — - - — - 4 l0 >10 -~< 20 ;»20 ~ < 30 j> 30 “'% % " % % Northern Grain Elevators 59,2 20,3 8.9 7.6 High Feedyards 77.8 l6.S h.5 l.2 Plains Feedmills 51.0 h0.9 8.0 0.1 Region Average 59,0 26,6 8,0 6,0 Southern Grain Elevators 55.1 hh.9 0.0 0.0 High Feedyards 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Plains Feedmills 50.0 h0.0 10.0 0.0 Region Average 55,2 h1,h 3,0 0,0 Rolling Grain Elevators 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Plains FeedY8Fd5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Feedmills 99.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Region Average 99,0 1,0 0,0 0,0 East Grain Elevators 83,5 16,5 0,0 0,0 Texas Feedyards 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Feedmills h8.6 h0.h 7.6 3.h Region Average 55,0 37,5 '5,0 2,5 6 .Gulf Grain Elevators 8h.h 8.6 6.2 0.8 * Coast Feedyards |l.9 l5.l 66.1 6.9 Feedmills 35,6 7,0 3,6 53,8 Region Average 31.0 9.0 l6.7 #3.} Rio Grain Elevators 89.6 10.0 0.0 0.0 , Grande Feedyards 30.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 Plains Feedmills 53.2 u2.8 3.5 0.5 Region Average 63,3 19,2 0,8 16,7 i: PQCQS- Grain Elevators 0,0 {ipiateau ’Feedyards 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6 Feedmills l7.l Al.5 26.5 lA.9 Region Average 0,1 0,2 0,3 99,0 %State Grain Elevators 56.3 23-5 8-“ ll-8 §Average Feedyards 67-3 l5-2 l0-9 5-5 > Feedmills u8.7 35.8 7.A 8-l 29 IR CDC) O -c5 U\ fil C>O (D 0JCJC> N O<5C> O OCDCD O O\CDCD O\ 4'C>-3 04 U\C>O lh c>c>c> <5 \O OIDCD O OCDCD-J O\C>C> N F~ U;C;O -3 GJC>C>u\<$<5 c>c>c>c> ca c>c>c>c> ca ' rl<§c:c: oo a\u\ 1: c>-c>c> Lfl \o<:<: -: c: c> =r O(5CD O C>C>C>*O OOCDCD O G)C)C>U\<fi UHMHMIMOIHDO mmxoh g0£uO 1 w»¢_wUw¢ z¢ou.11 4' U\C>O (W d)6O \O WJO \O \O flfi N'—C)O (N -JCDCD N QIOCDCD O —-O C>C>C> O OGDCD O ¢\ CD (D OCDCDO rfl O CDCDCDO (N G\ O o.:w o.oo_ o.oo_ ~.¢m mkouauogm EOLw N u~m~m1»o1~:o N 4'C> ¢\ F~Q lfl N OIDCD O OCDCD O P~G\N\-3 '—--Lfl OH G) 6 -6d~~ O\C;O fifi U\Olfl Cfi G)"-O\O C\ m»o~m>m_w mmxo» gmzuo Eogw N _.¢~ o.oo_ o.- o.oo_ o.oo_ o.oo_ o.oo_ m.¢m m.om _.wm m.wm _.m~ :.o o.oo_ w.mm ~.wm ¢.@~ m.m@ o.o ~.@@ m.- @.mm ;.=@ _.@m o.oo_ @.@@ ~.m~ ~.mm m.~m ~.m@ mguuzuogm EOLw N 1 1 1 1.1 1 1 m»¢_wuw¢ zaxumom z_n mo_Lomo~mu ommgouw Lo~m>o_w m>m~mc»ou_< >n mmugaom u>m~mcLo~_< Eogw nm>_oumm cgou new Eacmgom :_mgu *0 Hcougma uoumemumm mmmLw>< commmm 2563 M QQQQR. v mmmLm>< co_mmm ¢Qo.Q¢o.m1_¢¢.¢¢¢._ QoQ.oQ@._1_nw.QQm oQ¢.QQm v 0mmLm>< commom o¢Q.o@Q.m1_¢Q.Qoo._ Q¢o.¢¢Q._-_pw.¢¢m ¢¢¢.¢Qm v mmmLm>< ¢o_@~¢ QQQQQQA A o¢o.¢¢Q.m1_¢Q.QQo._ ¢¢o.¢¢o._-_ow.oom @2123 v ®mm;m>< commom Q¢¢.¢¢¢.m-_oo.¢¢¢._ ¢¢¢.¢¢¢._-_ow.¢Qm o¢¢.oom v omm»m>< co_mmm ¢¢¢.Q¢¢.mA. ¢Q¢.¢¢¢.m1_¢Q.¢o¢._ Q¢o.oo¢._1_pw.Q¢m ¢¢¢.¢¢m v ommLo>< commmm ¢oo.ooo.mA ¢¢¢.o¢¢.m1_¢Q.¢oQ._ ¢Q¢.¢¢¢._1_pw.¢¢m ooo.com v Am_o:m:@~ >~mumQmu mmmgopw Lo~m>o_u o~m~w :mm~m_¢ 1wouo¢ mc_m_¢ QUCMLQ om¢ ummou »_=¢ wmxoh “mum m¢m~_¢ @=_._o¢ m=m~_¢ ;m_= cgmzusom m=_~_¢ ;m_= cgozugoz co_mo¢ .w_ @_n~» Estimated Percent of Grain Sorghum and Corn Received at Texas Feedmiiis from Alternative Sources by Region, 1974 — - - — - - — - - - - --Sources - - - - - — - - - — - — % from % % from % from 0ut—of-State From Commodity Producers Texas Elevators 2 Elevators Other Grain Sorghum 69.8 29.6 0.6 0.0 Corn 61.1 19.8 19.1 0.0 Grain Sorghum 81.8 18.0 0.2 0.0 Corn 55.3 37.7 7.0 0 0 Grain Sorghum 28.9 ‘ 47.2 22.7 1.2 Corn 4.4 67.4 28.2 0.0 Grain Sorghum 36.1 30.3 31.2 2.4 Corn 1.0 30.3 68.1 0.6 Grain Sorghum 45.8 42.4 2.2 9.6 Corn 23.7 40.8 29.9 5.6 Grain Sorghum 90.7 9.3 0.0 0.0 Corn 77.4 16.3 6.3 0 0 Grain Sorghum 4.6 94.9 0.0 0.5 Corn 1.2 90.8 5.5 2.5 Grain Sorghum 41.6 40.5 14.6 3.3 Corn 26.3 30.0 42.5 1.2 gites on a state-wide basis the percent of grain sorghum and corn received at jfeedmiiis from alternative sources. 31 Table 20. Estimated Percent of Grain Sorghum and Corn Received at Texas Feefi from Alternative Sources by Region, l97h 8 - - — - - - - - - - - -8- Sources - - - - - - - . % from W % from % from Out-of-State f Region Commodity Producers Texas Elevators Elevators ” :?;fihern Grain Sorghum ll.O 80.9 8.] Plains Corn 8.l 58.9 33.5 S?uthern Grain Sorghum l0.3 88.9 l.3 H'9h Corn 1 1 91 6 2 1 Plains ' ' ' Rolling Grain Sorghum 5.8 83.l ll.l Plains’ Corn 0.0 86.6 .l East Grain Sorghum 0.0 l00.0 0.0 Texas Corn 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gulf Grain Sroghum 69.2 l8.5 l2.3 Coast Corn l6.b 23.h 58.6 Rio . Gra1n Sorghum l3.l 85.2 0.6 Grémde Corn 116 1 o 9 53 o Plains ' ' ' Pecos— Grain Sorghum l0.3 87.3 2.9 Plateau Corn 0.0 l00.0 0.0 State Grain Sorghum lfi.3 79.2 6.9 Average af Corn 7.8 60.9 30.5 3/ Indicates on a state-wide basis the percent of grain sorghum and corn reci Texas feedyards from alternative sources. ? 32 , _ _ _ _ ¢=A1n8¢A§5unu n:r=1nr<“-”; Q ;l; -‘;‘; Q ““ “P F L. c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c> “h; c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> ca c>c>c> c> c>c>c> m _1 c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> ca c>c>c>c> ca c>c>c> ca c>c>c> ,N 3 c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> ca c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c> L. F- ~; _- c>c>c>c> n~ c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>o\c>c>~o ~o<:<: \o \o<:c: ‘ N“; c>c>c>c> o\ c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c> ax c>c>c> I ¢ c> q) c> cm c>w\ -: nl o1 u\ a Ii Ii II- Ii T _¥ c>c>c>c> an c>c>c>c> <3 c>c>c> c> c>-c>c> =r 3 c>c>c>c> ca c>c>c>c> ca c>c>c> c> c>u\c>c>~o c>c>c> ca o\c>c> . ; L c> - \o u\ r~ r~ 4r F A} P " 1% I ‘i Ag L. c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>r~c>c> r~ c>c>c> c> c>c:<: 5*“; c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> ca c>c>c> c> ca-c>c> - c>c>c> c> c>c> . ¢ c> ca \o \o l} _¥ c>c>c>c> ca c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>~\c>c> wx c>c>c> c> c>c>c> *'N>§ c>c>c>c: <3 c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> caoocaca oo c:c:<: <9 <:<:<: 8; g c> c> w\ w\ c> ca c> 1 5 L. c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c:c> ~UN'§ c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> ca c>c>c> m . _x c>c>c>c> ca c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c> :N>§ c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> ca c>c>c> c> c>c>c> < g c>c>c>c> ca c> c> c> c>c> ca c>c> ca c> f‘ k I3???‘ F-F P1 I-— Ii III-Pi F1 F-Ii l-— ? ' s %g _. c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c> - ?““§ c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c> m O 1 c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c: r 3 c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c>g; E; c>c>c> c> c>c>c> L h Ii I-— 1; J L. c>c>c>o\ Lfl c>c><:<: <2 c>c>c: <3 c>c>c>uw 4r c>c>c: -r c>c>c> A 8'; c>c>c>r~ -s <:\o<:<: \o c>c>c> ca c>c>c>\o r\ c>c>c> ox c>c>c> ‘s 1.x @ 4!‘ (‘fi (‘fi O O O O\ O'\ C) Ch }_¥ c>c>c>- Lfi c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c>u\~o c>c>c> 4: c>c>c> * 3 c>c>c>n4 u\ c>4~c>c> 4» c>c>c> ca c>c>c>w\ n4 c>c>c> c> c>c>c> = L c> c>- tn \O \O ca F ? ? F? )f §.L- c>w\w\u\ ca c>r~c>c> wx c>c>c> ow u\c>c>r~ u> c>c>—- nu c>c>c> ’ sf; cannooun an <:c>c> c> r~c>c>c>c> o\ c>c>c> .»¢ 4- ma ma c> nl-s ~\c> u\ ux 04 __g c>r~r~u\ <§ c>w\c>c> n_ c>c>c> - 'u\c>c>~\-: c>c>o\ ma c>c>c> ‘.3 <3-¢-—-r "\ c>u\c>~\ o\ c>c>c> ax n:c>c>u\ ~\ c>c>o\ c> c>c>c> ; L c>o\o4on <0 u\c>- - co Lfl ~o -1 -s c>c>u\ r~ h §_. c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> ca c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c: § =f§ c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c> i am § ix c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> ca c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c> ? 013 c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c> )= 1'; c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c> ca c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> .; c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> aao a no aa_ nao a a 'a a ,su c>c>c>c> c>c>c>c> c>c>c> c>c>c>c> c>c>c> c>c>c> ;r- c>c>c>c: Q c>c>c>c> Q c>c>c> Q c>c>c>c> Q c>c>c> Q c>c>c> "au »~ c>c>c> - ow c>c>c> ~ ow c>c>c: on c>c>c> ~ ow c>c>c: ow c>c>c> (f) naao (u anao (‘o nan m a a so (u a‘a a (u a a a §Q - c>—-~\c> L. c>—-~\c> L <3-cn L <3-—-Nx L <3-en ;QQO||O||QO|| “fimaaw? mas“: “as 2 “as”: “as: “as .1 w\ ~\ w\ ;J 5 Vho<: A, yhoc> V\c>c> an c a a c am c ma C a A c a a »‘ ~/ c>c> o c>c> o c> 0 c>c> o <:<: c>c> -- c>c> -- c>c: -- c>c> -- c><> -- c>c> ,. u\c> ow Lfl 500,000 Region Average State Average af 5/ Indicates for each source the percent of gra Table 22. Estimated Modal Split of Grain Sorghum and Corn Received at TeX§: Feedmills by Region, 197h * - - - - — - - - - - - Sources - - - - - - - ' -S Other Out-of-St; Producers Texas Elevators Elevatoa % % % % % 5 Region Commodity Truck Rail Truck Rail Truck Ré .:?';he'" Grain sorghum 100 0 0.0 97.2 2.8 100.0 '9. corh 100.0 0.0 99.7 0.3 17.6 Plains ; :?“;he'" croih Sorghum 100.0 0.0 80.3 19.7 100.0 i '9. corh 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 1 Plains § Rolling crash sorghum 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 . Plains Corn 100.0 0.0 100 0 0.0 100 0 Q 0 East Grain sorghum 100.0 0.0 5u.h 05.6 57.6 Q Texas Corn l00.0 0.0 68.1 3l.9 l7.2 3 Gulf Grain sorghum 100.0 0.0 92.9 7.1 no.3 L Coast Corn 100.0 0.0 90.5 9.5 27.2 it glgnde Grain sorghum 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 Plains corh 100.0 0.0 8.9 91 1 100.0 Pecos- Grain Sorghum 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 Plateau Corn l00.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 l00.0 § Source Grain Sorghum l00.0 0.0 85.2 14.8 6h.8 35% 1 Average 2/ Corn l00.0 0.0 83.0 17.0 l9.9 805g 5/ Indicates for each source the percent of grain sorghum and corn received a§ Texas feedmills by truck and rail. 9 34 gble 23. iuicates for each source the percent of grain sorghum and corn received at alas feedyards by truck and rail. Estimated Modal Split of Grain Sorghum and Corn Received at Texas Feedyards by Region, 1979 - - - - - - - - - - Sources - - - - - - - - - - - Other 0ut-of-State Producers. Texas Elevators Elevators % % % % % Z Commodity Truck Rail Truck Rail Truck Rail §‘h°'" Grain Sorghum 100.0 0.0 100 0 0.0 100.0 0.0 Corn 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 .‘he'" Grain Sorghum 100.0 0.0 85.9 10.6 100.0 0.0 Corn 100.0 0.0 60.5 35.5 100.0 0.0 Grain Sorghum l00.0 100.0 99.6 0.0 99.2 0.8 Corn 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 l00.0 0.0 Grain Sorghum 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 Corn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 Grain Sorghum 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 l00.0 0.0 Corn 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 9%.] 5.9 Grain Sorghum 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 Corn 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 Grain Sorghum 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Corn 0.0 0.0 l00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grain Sorghum 100.0 0.0 98.3 1.7 97.4 2.6 e a/ Corn 100.0 0.0 93.3 6.7 99.4 0.6 35 v nun-um flhlaml.“ .».-4.‘.v.44-» imnaannuauqnu-nuwn- ‘ < - Table 20. Estlmated PeF¢8flt 0f Out-of-State Originated Grain Sorghum and Corn Received by Texas Grain Elevators from Alternative States by Region, l97h - - - - - - - - - - ORIGINATING STATES — - - - - - - § Receiving 0% Region Commodity Oklahoma Kansas Nebraska New Mexico S % % % % §?';“e'" Grain Sorghum 7.1 69.1 19.2 0.0 '9 0.0 02.0 .6 0.0 Plains c°'“ 57 fi?“;“e'" Grain Sorghum 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 '9 . 100.0 0.0 0.0 Plains Corn 0 0 ~ Rolling Grain Sorghum 0.0 050.0 50.0 0.0 Plains Corn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 East Grain Sorghum l6.7 55-3 l3-0 0-0 Texas Corn 0.0 68.3 20.9 0.0 Gulf Grain Sorghum 0.2 00.1 59-3 0-0 Coast Corn U.0 lZ.6 0.2 0.0 Rio P ' . 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grande €ra1n Sorghum 3 8 20 O 30 I 0.0 Plains Orn ' ' ' Pecos— Grain Sorghum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Plateau Corn 0.0 l00.0 0.0 0.0 ztate Grain Sorghum 7.l 62.1 28,0 0,0 "stage 2/ Corn 0.0 75.3 20.5 0.0 gf Indicates on a state-wide basis the percent of out-of-state originated and corn recenved by Texas grann elevators from each originating state. 36 ._ grain sorgi 16616 25. §§ceiving by Texas Feedmills from Alternative States by Region, i97# Estimated Percent of Out-of-State Originated Grain Sorghum and Corn Received - - - - - - - - - ORIGINATING STATES - - - - - - - - - - - . Other fgion Commodity Oklahoma Kansas Nebraska New Mexico States 0 % % % % % igrthern . _ 2}gh Graln Sorghum iO0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ;ainS corh 0.0 0.8 99.1 0.0 0.1 i h g9; er" Grain sorghum 56.8 0.0 03.2 0.0 0.0 gains corh 1.5 9.7 88.9 0.0 0.9 §1[in0 eroih sorghum 1.7 95.2 3.1 0.0 0.0 Q9105 corh 0 0 89.5 10.5 0.0 0.0 ,. Grain Sorghum S 6.2 75.6 18.0 0.1 .1 _:35 Corn 0.7 55.2 32.0 0.0 11.7 _; Grain Sorghum 7.fi 6i.Q 2%.] 0.0 7.1 ;st 8 corh 7.2 29.0 16.6 0.0 67.2 inde Grain sorghum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 sgns 2 corh 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 @§s- eroih Sorghum 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 gfeau Corn ' 0.0 69.3 0.7 0.0 30.0 ie Grain Sorghum 5.6 78.h 15.6 O.i 0.3 gage 2/ Corn 1.3 hh.h #O.3 0.0 Ih.O %1ndicates on a state-wide basis the percent of out—of-state originated grain sorghum fgnd corn received by Texas feedmiiis from each originating state. 37 Estimated Modal.Split of Grain Sorghum and Corn Received by Texas Grain Elevate? Table 26. from Out—oF-State Sources by Region, i975 f - - - - - - - - - - - - - ORIGINATING STATES - - - - - - - - - Oklahoma Kansas Nebraska New Mexico Receiving % % _ % _ % _ 1 Region Commodity Truck Rail Truck Rail Truck Rail Truck Rail Tr¢§ "?"“e““ Grain Sorghum 72.0 27.6 65.5 3h.5 2 7 97.3 0.0 0.0 100;? “'9? Corn 0.0 0.0 20.3 75.7 0 0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0;! Plains f Seuthern Gra;n SQrghum 0.0 0.0 60.0 36.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0,? High corn 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0,? Plains RO||;ng Grain Sorghum 0.0 O O 0.0 lO0.0 0.0 lO0.0 O O 0.0 O Plains COFH O-0 0-0 0 0 0 O 0.0 O O O 0 0.0 0 East Grain Sgfghum l5.b 8Q.6 0.0 100.0 0.0 lO0.0 0.0 O O 0 Texas COFR O 0 O O 58 9 hi l 69-7 35 3 O O 0 O 0 ‘Gulf l Grain Sorghum 0.0 lO0.0 0 5 99.5 0.0 lO0.0 0.0 0 O l0O.§ P Coast Corn 0'0 0-0 22 R 77 6 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76’? R‘ . Gignde Grain Sorghum 8.g, 0.0 “0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 Plains Corn . 0.0 9-h 50 6 32 8 67.2 0 0 0 0 59 Pecos- Grain Sorghum 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 O O 0.0 O O 0.0 0 H Plateau Corn 0-0 0.0 98 7 1.8 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 . f; ating Grain Sorghum h8.6 5l.h h3.b 56.6 l.l 98.9 0.0 0.0 100.3 State Corn 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 l8.8 81.2 0.0 0.0 #2.: Average P .3 _a_/ state the percent of Texas-elevator destined grain sorj 5/ Indicates for each originating and corn shipments transported by truck and rail. 38 Out-of-State Sources by Region, 1970 27. Estimated Modal Split of Grain Sorghum and Corn Received by Texas Feedmills from - - - - - - - - - - - --ORIGINATING STATES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .- iites for each originating state the percent .}rn shipments transported by truck and rail. of Texas~feedmi11 destined grain sorghum Oklahoma Kansas Nebraska New Mexico Other Vlng z 8 8 8 z 5 Commodity Truck Rai1~ Truck Rail Truck Rail Truck Rail Truck Rail 5'" Grain Sorghum 100 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Corn 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 16.8 83.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 Grain Sorghum 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Corn 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 Grain Sorghum 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Corn 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grain Sorghum 90.6 9.0 57.5 02.5 07.0 53.0 100.0 0.0 19.2 80.8 Corn 79.8 20.2 13.9 86.1 20.2 79.8 100.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 Grain Sorghum 100.0 0.0 35.2 60.8 01.2 58.8 0.0 0.0 20.1 79.9 Corn 100.0 0.0 11.3 88.7 21.8 78.2 0.0 0.0 27.6 72.0 Grain Sorghum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 Corn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0‘ i Grain Sorghum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Corn 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 Grain Sorghum 91.9 8.1 66.2 33.8 08.7 51.3 100 0 0.0 19.9 80.1 Corn 92.7 7.3 15.9 80.1 20.3 79.7 100.0 0.0 20.2 75.8 39 Table 28. Estimated Percent of Texas-Elevator Originated Grain Sorghum and Corn Receive$ Texas Feedyards from Grain Elevators in Alternative Regions, I970 - - - - - - - - - GRAIN ORIGINATING REGION - - - - - - +§ , Northern Southern Rio ¥ Receiving High High Rolling East Gulf Grande Region Commodity Plains Plains Plains Texas Coast Plains Q?;;he'" Grain Sorghum 99.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Plains Corn -99.7 0.3 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 Southern . High Grain Sorghum 20.8 70.2 l.3 3.7 0.0 0.0 Plains Corn 57.6 03.5 0.0 8.9 0.0 0.0 Rolling Grain Sorghum 54.3 37.0 3 0.0 3.6 0.7 0 0 Plains Corn 77.6 lQ.9 7.5 0.0 0.0 0 0 East Grain Sorghum 0.0 lh.3 0 0 85.7 0.0 0.0 Texas Corn 0.0 0.0 O O l00.0 0.0 0 0 'Gulf_ Grain Sorghum 0.0 0.0 0.0, 0.0 l00.0 0.0 5085f Corn 8.5 0.0 0 0 9 Q 82.1 0 0 Rio _ Grande - Grain Sorghum 0.8 38.7 Q 5 0.0 20.5 3l 5 Plains Corn 0.0 0.0 0 0 l00.0 0.0 0 PeC0$' Grain Sorghum 5.6 63.7 0.8 0.0 0 l 22.9 Plateau Corn 0.0 l00.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 State Grain Sorghum 66.3 22.0 l l 2 5 .2 0.7 Average §/ Corn 86.8 9.5 0 2 I 9 l.6 0.0 40 _§/ Indicates on a state—wide basis the percent of Texas-elevator originated grain sorg? and corn received by Texas feedyards from each originating region. ile 29_ Estimated Percent of Out-of-State Originated Grain Sorghum and Corn Received at Texas Feedyards from Alternative States, 197% Commodity Grain Sorghum is than .o5%. Sorghum Sorghum Sorghum Sorghum Sorghum - - - - - - - - - "ORIGINATING STATES - - - - - - - - - - - New Mexico 6% J74?‘ J='@ CO CO CDO QC) kOQ OJ?‘ \IO n>c> u1c> c>c> —-c> CDO Sorghumi Sorghum édcates on a state-wide basis, the percent of out-of-state originating corn received ;Texas feedyards from each originating state. C\@ in Pecos- Plateau Rio Grande Plains Gulf Coast in Sorghum and Corn Received at Texas Feedyards from Gra --ORIGINATING REGIONS - East Texas iginated Gra Rolling Plains Table 30, Estimated Modal Split of Texas-Elevator Or Elevators in Alternative Regions, l97h Northern Southern High Plains _- c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> f aw‘? c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> ¢<£i .x c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> ozii U o o o u o o o a o o o o o o . ee 3 c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> ocx; \- Q O . c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>of -- c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> <3<3 c>q§ cNP f0 .x c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> ocfif U o a o o a o o I o o o 0 o a q gw so 3 c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>o; L ca c> o _* _- c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> ocqf ao m c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> o<3§ .x c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>o§ U Q o o 0 o o o a 0 o a a o o I w‘ ae 3 c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> o<§’ L c> c>c> c> c> c>oa - c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> ;>c> c>c> c>o§ ee m c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>o§ .x c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>o§ U o a I o 0 o 0 o o o o a o 0 Q 5H“.- ae 3 cacq c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>oi L c>c> c> c> c> c> c> c>o; ‘n- l-_ v1 F— F_' II- c1 F- I- l-Ié ._ c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c: c>o§ ae m c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>of .x c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>ofi ae 3 c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>og L c> c>c> c3 <3 c>o@ —- c>c> c>c> mic) c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> -of sets c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>o? .x c>c> c>c> a>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> oxo U 0 o o a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a o o q so 3 c>c> c>c> o\c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> o\o L c>c> c>c> o\c> ca c> c>c> o\o: P ? C i ? C C F? i C Q , —- c>c> c3\o \o<3 c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> ~or\ ae m c>c> c>4- c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> N h at P~P~ 3 .x c>c> c>4- 4-c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> -:cn£ U a a a a 0 0 0 o c a a 0 a 0 ‘ g ‘H; ee 3 c>c> c>u\ o\c> c>c> c>c> c>c> c>c> h~~, ‘L c>c> w\o4 o\c> ca c> c> o\cy, E E E E E E E E % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 .5 .c .c .c .c .c .c .5 5 ow ow ow ow ow ow ow m ,= > L L L L L L L L u O O O O O O O O * '-— U’) U) U7 U7 U) (l) (D (D "o . »f 0 c c c c _c c c c V; E ou- c ox c o: c 01- c ou- a-n C o1 c '1 E m L ru L m L cu L ru L m L m L m L»; Q LQ LQ L0 LQ L0 LQ LQ Lqsi; <3 <3<3 <3<3 est» <3<3 <3<3 (Dc) LDL) 0:43 m 5 C C C f, -- L L ow 3 | 3 > C Q) U! Q) U‘) C (h G) U’) I fU C C‘ -- Q .5 c .C c -— c: m 4-» 13 t: m d) -- O10: m on- H ‘c O—I {J I Qua l1- 01 +J m q_ m c ox o ‘J m c g¢ i} i. u ow L ovm 3 ovm -— m m x -— m c>m m u m ---- up ma: 0-—- o---- 0-— rum 3o --L-- m-- Luv aim: zzzza. uazza. mza. |u|- csL: cream. n.a. c>m::; a, , -'-. ._mmL vcm Juspu .l >n vwuhoamcmku mnLm>vmmw mmxoh ow mucmeamnm CLOU new Essmgow cmmkm we ucougma ms» opmum mcmumcmmmko sumo Q0» moumumvc_ \m \M omm»o>< Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q m.QQ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ QLQQ mumum Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q ~.@w ~.Q Q.QQ Q.Q Q.QQ_ EQQQQQQ QQQQQ QQ_QQ ncmmmgo 0N0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 v7.00 :m®um_¢ o o o.o o.o o.o o.oo_ o.o o.oo_ o.o o.o o.o Eanmgom c_mLu nmouom Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q Q.Q Q.Q QLQQ w=mQ_Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.Q E:;mLOm Q_~.Q QQQQQQ . QQQ QUQ Q QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ CLOQ Qmmou o o o o o o o o o.o o.o o.o o.oo_ o.o o.o Esgmgow c_mLw »_:w o@o o@o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o chow wmxmh o o o o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o Eszmgom cmmgw Qmmw QUQ Q QQ_ QUQ Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ QLQQ mQQ~_Q o o o o o o o.o o.o o.oo_ o._ Q.QQ o.o o.oo_ E:£m;Om c_mLw QQm__QQ QUQ QUQ QUQ QUQ QUQ Q.Q Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.Q c;Ou ..hM"n Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.Q ED£mLOm Q_QLQ QQQQQQQQ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ QQQQ WQmM_Q Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ E3£mLOm c_mL0 Q WI . ckmgupoz __m. xuaph _mmm xuagh _mmm xusgh _mmm xusgh _mmm 102;» >u@UOEEO0 co_mmm N N N N N N N N N N QQm>m@Q@¢ mowmuw Lmcuo oumxoz 3oz mxmmknmz mmmcmx mEo:m_xo plant” I)“. V... fiU. ;_ Q OUNLU>< cO@m0m . . .. an} :~m_ .=¢mm@m >n momkomoumu m~mw Lo~m>m_w m>-mcLo~_< >3 wco_~mc_~mo¢ m>_~m:Lo~_< ou m~coEQ_;m sscmgow c_m;o ~mLo~m>o_m :_mLw mmxmw we wcouhmm vmum um m . . . . . . . E_ M .~ @_@mP o5 a... ad if w.m u; 79. 9° =5 ¢.¢ ¢.¢ ¢.¢ ¢.¢ ¢.¢ ¢.¢ ¢.¢¢_ ¢.¢ o.¢ o.Q ¢¢¢.¢¢m_m. =m-~_¢ ¢.¢ ¢.o ¢.¢ @.@_ m m ¢._ @.@@ ¢.o =.¢ m.N ¢¢¢.¢¢m v. |mouom Q.¢ ¢.o o.¢ ¢.¢ ¢.¢ o.¢ ¢.~ m.m= _.m= ¢.¢ ~m~h»>< commwm ¢.¢ ¢.¢ Q.Q o.¢ Q.Q ¢.o m.@_ w.¢¢ m.wm ¢.¢ oQ¢.¢¢o.m-_¢o.¢Qo._ m=_~_¢ ¢.Q ¢.Q ¢.¢ ¢.¢ ¢.Q ¢.¢ ¢.~ ¢.mm ¢.m ¢.¢ ¢¢¢.¢oQ._-_pw.¢¢m uvcmuw o.o Q.o ¢.o ¢.¢ o.¢ ¢.¢ 4.. w.~= w.¢m ¢.o ¢o¢.¢¢m.v o_¢ ~.¢ ¢.o _.¢ m.Q _._ ¢.o w.~ o.¢ _._w ~.=_ @m~L@>< =o~m@¢ _.Q ¢.o _.o ~._ ¢.¢ ¢.¢ ..m ¢.¢ m.mm o.¢ ooo.¢o¢.m-_¢¢.¢¢Q._ ~.Q o.o o.¢ ¢.¢ m.m ¢.¢ m.“ o.o ¢.~w m.¢ ¢¢¢.¢¢¢._-_mb.¢¢m Hmmou ¢.¢ ¢.Q o.o Q.¢ w.o ¢.¢ _._ ¢.¢ m.w¢ @.m¢ ¢o¢.¢¢m v »_=Q w.~ @.o ~.~ ~.o w.__ @.@ o.@_ ¢.¢ , m.= _.~= @m~Lu>< =o_@@¢ @.= m._ ¢.w m._ m.m @.~ ¢.m ¢.o ~.~_ @.mm ¢Qo.Q¢¢.~A N ¢.¢ o.¢ o.Q Q.¢ ¢.Q ~.mm m.m ¢.¢ ¢.¢ m.:m ¢¢¢.¢oQ.~-_oQ.o¢¢._ m.¢ Q.¢ ¢.¢ ¢.o @.m~ o.¢ N.wm o.¢ ¢.¢ @.¢m ¢o¢.QQ¢._-_pw.o¢m mmxoh ¢.~_ m.¢ ¢.Q m.¢ _.__ :.~_ =.m_ ¢.¢ m.¢ @.~= ¢¢¢.¢¢m v. ummw 5m ¢d Q6 o6 9D 9m ma. o... 9o F? wmm$>< =29; _._ ¢.¢ ¢.o o.¢ m.¢ o.¢ m.Q o.¢ o.o m.~m ¢o¢.¢¢o.m-_¢¢.ooQ._ Q.¢ ¢.¢ ¢.Q o.¢ ¢.¢ o.o ¢.¢ ¢.¢ o.¢ ¢.o oo¢.¢¢o._-_pw.¢¢m mc_m_¢ ~.~ ¢.¢ ¢.¢ ¢.o :.m~ ¢.¢_ m.N~ ¢.o ¢.¢ o.m~ ¢¢¢.Q¢m v. m=m__¢¢ ma Q6 m; 4.: ma ~.o_ Nam o6 Tm Q8 omP6>< :29; ¢.¢ ¢.Q w._ =.m ¢.Q m.w m.:¢ ¢.o ~.¢_ ~.m~ ¢¢¢.¢¢¢.mAH ¢.¢ ¢.Q ¢.¢ ¢.¢ o.¢ ¢.¢ ¢.Q¢_ ¢.¢ ¢.o ¢.¢ ¢¢¢.¢¢¢.m-_¢¢.o¢¢._ mc_m_¢ m.= o.¢ ¢.m ~.m ¢.m @._ _.@@ ¢.¢ o.~_ m.m ¢¢o.¢¢¢._-_pw.¢¢m ;@_= w.o ¢.Q ¢._ m._ m.~_ w._m m.w= ¢.o . m.¢ ¢.m ¢¢¢.¢¢m v. chozusow m._ @.o m._ _.m N.“ m.m_ m.@¢ _.o ¢.__ _.¢_ ~m~L@>< =Q,m~¢ _.¢ =.¢ ~._ @.:_ m._ =.~ m._m ¢.Q w.¢m _.~_ o¢¢.¢¢¢.mA. =.~ ~.o _._ _.m ¢.m ¢.~_ m.mm o.o m.m @.@ ¢¢o.¢¢¢.m-_¢¢.o¢¢._ m=»w_n ~.~ _.¢ w.~ ~.@N ~.~ @.m_ _.m¢ =.¢ =.@ ¢.__ ¢¢Q.¢¢¢._-_pw.oom % ;;@M: ~.o @._ ¢.m m.m “.4 ~.@~ ¢.¢¢ ¢.¢ ¢._ o.~_ ¢¢¢.Q¢m v ¢L@;~=oz LQLHO mEo;m_¥o mco~_L< m. »m_m;m:nv . .cLo _ m m op N ow N Q» N o»»@_ U _MMHWM~m wLm¢m@@_w m@L~>v@~u m~Lo¢ wpkom mugom >~mumQ~U wmmhoum =o_m@¢ Q Q o . w mmxoh @__,> _~m_L;Q co~mo>_mu Lo»m>o_w mc_QQ_;m op N mmxoh op N nmczogm mzahou |~coE:mom . . op N 0» N 0» N lcopwnoz - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - wz¢_kF?F°M. Region Storage Capacity (bushels) OOFHN OOffiC COflfiC COCO Ol-fll\(\l COP-O Ov-(‘NC 6--o CCCJ‘ OCP-fifi COP-LR '-'U\~'I'\D mr-IIII- OJPCC O\v—-W\-—- CNl-fl COCO COCO COCO OCv-N Northern g 500.000 High 500,001-l,OO0,000 Plains 1,000,001-3,000,000 >3,000,000 0.8 0.9 l3.h Region Average COCO COCO COCO OCOC COCO COCO COCO COCO CO CC 0.0 0.0 CC CC l00.0 l00.0 0 0 CC CO 0.0 CC CC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Southern _<_ 500,000 High 500,001-l,000,000 Plains l,000,00l-3,000,000 >3.000,000 Region Average 0.0 0.0 92.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 COO COO COO COO COO COO COO COO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rolling 5 500,000 Plains 500,00l-l,000,000 l,000,00l-3,000,000 Region Average 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 fNOCO P-OCO COCO COCO COCO COCO COCO COCO COCO COCO COCO COCO COCO COCO O\ CO CO CO CO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 East _<_ 500,000 Texas 500,001-l,000,000 l,000,00l-3,000,000 > 3,000,000 Region Average 0.0 COCO COCO COCO COCO COCO COCO COCO COCO CO CO l00.0 CO CO CO CO 0.0 100.0 CC CC 0.0 0.0 CO CO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Gulf 5_500,000 Coast 500,00l-l,000,000 l,000,00l-3,000,000 >3,000,000 Region Average 29.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rio 5 500,000 500,001-l,000,000 l,000,00l-3,000,000 Region Average 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grande Plains 0.0 32.6 0.0 l9.9 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CO CO CC CO CO CO 5_500,0o0 > 500.000 Pecos- Plateau 3.6 0.0 ion Average Reg State 7.3 l3.0 62.2 0.0 9.8 Average Q] gf Indicates on a state-wide basis the percent of Texas grain elevators’ total corn shipments to each destination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - m=Q;<=;mQQ-- - - T- - - - - - - N- ¢ - - - W.w Q.Q ~.m Q.Q.» Q.Q Q.~_ o.WQ QNNF .m_w muLm>umm¢ mpkom m~Lo¢ muhom mmL< >QmQossoQ commmm QQ Q -Q_iQ QM N -._QQ mmxwk ¢_mLo mmxwk @__Q> mQm_L;u QQQm@>_QQ QQQQQQQQ O 0Q w ow N ow N mmxoh 0» N nmczogm msagou lpcoenmmm Q ow N op N Q op N ncoumnoz . Ow N - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - QzQ_kQ mcQm~mcm~mmQ @>QQmQLQQ_< QQ QQQQEQQQQ QLQQ QQQ e:;mLom QQQLQ __mEn@o¢ mmxmh QQ QQQQQQQ QQQQEQQQQ .Qm w_QwP N-— cooomo m ooooo m ooo o mooo m ooo o ooo o oo o m m mNoo - ooooo N ooo o coooo m ooo o ooo o oo o N 6 n: Nm--o m o Lfl o m m .c s fi NNmo -— oNoo m ooo o -ooo m ooo c5 ooo o oo o m N: ommoco o-oo m ooo o -—ooo ~o ooo o ooo o oo o m ‘t 4r 4r o o o ooo 4r N- mooo <2- oooo o ooo o oooo m ooo o ooo o oo o o m r0 mooo o oooo o ooo o oooo co ooo o ooo o oo o m E o: O m N .2 Ii m :6 mooo ooo o ooo o oooo m ooo o ooo o oo o ~1- x N: oooo m oooo o ooo o oooo - ooo o ooo o oo o 4r o s- mooo m o m k i?i l—— N-— mmmm m omoo - ooo o oooo o ooo o ooo o oo o m m ru ~o_-rou\ m ocooo - ooo o. oooo o ooo o ooo o oo o o g l! NCH l-fl o O o o m N I? I in’ m-mm m omoo m ooo o oooo o ooo o ooo o oo o m < N: mmm: a o--oo co ooo o oooo o ooo o ooo o oo o m g Ln <1- om O Ch 4 F i I? m N- mNm- co coxoom m ooo o oooo o ooo o ooo o \oo m o 0— o 0 u a a o 0 0 0 a c 0 0 o a a u o I n a a o o u a o 0 u o o -- m _-v-mN_-v~ on oomom ._ n00 o oooo o ooo o ooo o No N - E o: mcomm m oo oo o o o - ,-- an o Ii i! Ii l‘ i! f- aé a-oo-m N Na-om -- ooo o oooo o ooo o ooo o so <1- o -- N: m-mmm --o co ooo o oooo o ooo o ooo o mo m m U l- N-- mmmm m ~omoo \o --oo o oNom m ooo o ooo o oo o m m m o--mN oo NJOO m moo m omoN -- ooo o ooo o oo o o m- n: moomNN -- o: N N -- 4r m m.- zg f, Lnmmm - _-r-oo a- moo o ocoom m ooo o ooo o oo o m t-o N: mooNm -- mmoo o Noo m oNomoo ooo o ooo o oo o m L? : \O'-NI\I\ m o m ooo N m oo o o o ~o 6 - m N- mNmm m Na-oN N moo m mooo -— ooo o ooo o oo o _-r *- .~ s- m 400mm m -oo_-r N moo m ~oooo m ooo o ooo o oo o ._ ‘O ,.:c8 n: --_-ru\-- -- om m m o <1- m g ‘Xmm .285 f’ moomm m oooooo oo moo m -ooo m ooo o ooo o oo o q; f) m - N: m-a-N o oomom m _-roo _-r mooo o ooo o ooo o oo o m 5 u; t: coma-coco mu: moo N o m oo o m b >~ .0 ‘u V. N- wen-m: -—ooo\o m ooo o mNooo m --oo - ooo o oo o m ‘I; g 2 NO\—-4' 4r o--o-- -- ooo o -Nooo m $00 m ooo o oo o N 6 ms. ‘ 8 mm :_€~ f, a-mmmo O\NO~T m ooo o a. .3 oooo o oooo o ooo o oooo o ooo o moN co oo o u: '3 N: oooo o oooo o ooo o oooo o ooo o mom m oo o m H 1.. mom m m '0 - — .5 m ‘a N- mmmN N ooooo m ooo o _-rooo m moo m mooo m oo o ~o L - m NO\O~—- -- oooo m ooo o ~oooo m -mm N mom m oo o o O um a: mmmm m o m . m o m N *-' “fill II 0-— g Q-L E8 x mmmoo co Nooo -— ooo o mooo - moo -- moN - oo o 4r Q U u a u o 0 n o u o o a a o 0 o 0 a 0 0 a o a o o 0 a o n a Q '1 u N: mmmoo o0 mooo o ooo o mooo o comm m ooN u: oo o m <1) ; N mmm m moco o o ,\ "n m X w +- N- I\O~'I'N m oooo o mo m NNN o N_-ro - ooo o \oo \o m ‘*6 (n o— c n o a a o n o 0 0 0 a a a o c 0 a u o o 0 c n 0 o a a . 1:» m oommoo oooo o moo 4r o mo mmo m ooo o ooo oo ,__ 8x6 a: mooom m oo o co NooNmoo N N N w +5 .mm ' Q) gm :6 momoo m oooo o mom -— moooo 4r oomo m ooo o _-ro 4r ,\ 8 --u N: moa-o - oooo o oom Lfl moomN m moo N ooo o -o -- c5 o _ns. L -- o -- m-m -— m m m m m Q- l9< l- g. Q) _ l: M C 0 oo oo oo oo oo oo -- oo oo oo oo oo oo w oo oo oo oo oo oo m Q o mmo poo as npc an ar- C cn oooo oooo ooo oooo ooo ooo oo -- m oooo c: oooo u.» ooo o oooo m ooo 0 ooo a» oo o: w s. ~oo - m ooo - o": ooo o» ooo - m ooo m ooo cn oo m m o o Qgo f“ QQQo f“ Ana f“ mnno f“ nan (D nan (U an (O Q) #J>~/\ o-mo :- o-mo x- o--m \- o-mo x- o-—~\ x- o-m x- oo \- -o mum mono» OIIOQ OIIQ) 01:00 Onuw Ollcu OOQJ t-u o oom oom m om .1: oo Voo oo loo oo Vloo \/|/\ ru ‘Ja u‘) wOQA C ‘QQA c V‘o~a c v naA c V‘ao~ c a n c c Q) mm : oo o oo o oo 0 oo o oo 0 oo o 0 >u n oo -- oo -- oo -- oo -- oo -- oo -- -- x. u v mo m mo cn mo m mo cn mo m mo cn c» o pu- a Q a Q a Q a Q) a Q) Q Q) Q) l;- u; ._ q: -- u: -- n: -- a: -» n: -- o: a: V! cu 4-! m u m C. C -- c L. \- Ui J 0 ‘D m; o m Q) m Cm Om lm lccn c QQ .c c 4: c: --c m u ‘or: mo --oru - q__ u.c-- H.C-- ---— Hm u-m c-- 04-» u--s.\ ._q, 1.01m :cnm --ru mx -m 0mm um muwml so O---— O---— 0- mv :0 -—L--- Q- um> \ ma: zzo. mzm mo. un- mo mun. 0.0. oc< ml Other Truck Rail 0.0 0.0 0.0 ion, l97A Arizona Oklahoma Truck Rail Truck Rail . 0.0 0.0 0.0 Texas Texas Grain Texas Feedyards Elevators Feedmills California Truck Rail Truck Rail Truck Rail Truck Rail 100.0 0.0 95.8 h.2 0.0 0.0 Corpus Browns- Christi ville Ports Ports Truck Rail Truck Rail 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Estimated Modal Split of Texas Grain Elevators Corn Shipments to Alternative Destinations by Alternative Grain Elevator Size Categories by Reg Houston- Beaumont- Galveston Area Ports shipping Elevator Storage Region Capacity Truck Rail (bushels) s_500,000 0.0 °°° ° °°°° ° 99°. c? °.°.°.°. °. °.°.".°. °. c??? °. 9°! c? QQQ Q c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> cf C§C{C{C§ Cf ¢{¢{¢{ ¢{ ¢{¢{ Z . . . . - - - 0 - - - - ~ ' ' ' ' c>o °°° ° °°°° ° °°°. c! 9‘??? c? cf°.°.°. 9 99°. °. 9°- c? c§c§c§ c§ c§c§c§c§ c§ c§c§c> c> c>c>c>c> ca c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c> ca c>c> o 9999 9999 9 999 9 9999 9 99999 9999 99° ‘c§c§ c§ c§c>c>c> c> c>c>c> ca c>c>c>c> c> c>c>c>c> c> c>c>C> C> C>¢> O QQ Q <>~¢> 0n °°°° ° °°° ° °°°.9 o. 999°. °. 99°. °. 99: O O I O O I O q O I O O O "' gLflQ N QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q °°°° '\ °°°° ° °.°.°. 9 °.°.°Z°. C! 999°. °. 99°. °. °.°. °. QQ (T0 Q- o Ql-flQ 0N QQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I gg-NQ (N QQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q QLHQ QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Qv-N N QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I QQ\O \O QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q C“ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q QINCH U'\ QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I I O O O O O I O O O O QJQ 72 QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q QQI- 0- QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I QU'\U\ "N QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q QU‘\— N Q Q Qéfv- 6N QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' --o\- - 0000 0 00o 0 0000 0 0on0 0 000 0 00 0‘ Q\OU\ f\ QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q_ QQQ 0O QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q U\U'\U\ (T0 QQ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q? Q Q Q Q i Q Q Q _ QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q O O O I O O a O I O O O a O O O O I I O I O O O O O O O O O QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a O O O O O O O I O O O I QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O O QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q QLfiQ °'\ QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQQ Q QQQ Q QQ Q QU'\Q '— Q Q Q QQ Q Q Q Q QQQQ Q QQ QQ Q O O O O O O I O O I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ 00° ago an 00o ano an QQQ QQQQ QQQ QQQQ QQQQ QQQ _QQ QQQ U QQQQ 0 QQQ U QQQQ O QQQQ U QQQ U QQ 0 QQ " U1 QQQ '0 U5 QQQ U’! QQQ O U’! QQQ 9 U‘! QQQ U! QQ Q_ aao f“ 0.000 f“ Qua m ammo m ‘flflfio (u hi0 I“ II ' .-mo 0.. o-mc 0. 0-m 0. 0-—m0 0- 0--m0 0- 0-0“ 0- OO \- 0000 00000 0000 000000 00000 0000 O00 as ' 2 “as ' 2 “as 2 “ass: 2 “ass 2 “as 2 ““ 2 I“ W\ -. Q QQ QQ O QQ O QQ O QQ O QQ O QQ U , c>c: -- c>c> -- c>c> -- c>c> -- c>c> -- c>c> -- - Lno a m0 g m0 3 m0 g0 m0 g m0 g 8V Q Q Q Q Q Q 0- x v- x 0—- Z v- Z v- Z '— Z g C W :0 010 gm a 0: .0: c -—c v0 4-0 "g2 0'00: 45'“ U.C'— -—-- 4-10! 1-0-0!) g... o“ , U510 30010 -—m IDX |—Q um‘ E: o'_'— 0"’ (U0 Q0 MILO- 0am fl- wzca. mo. 0.0.00- 00 00:00:. ma. Table 36- Northern Houston- Texas Beaumont- Corpus Galveston Ports Z Texas Grain Brownsville‘ Texas Ports Z Christi Ports 2 Arizona Oklahoma Other % % -Truck Rail Truck Rail Truck Rail California % 2 Truck Rail Feedmills % % Truck Rail Elevators Z % Truck Rail Feedyards Shipping % 2 2 % Region Commodity Truck Rail Truck Rail Truck Rail Trugk Rail 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 90.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Northern High 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 Grain Sorghum 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 Corn 5.5 9#.5 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Plains 0.0 0.0 Southern High 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 Grain Sorghum 12.8 87.2 36.8 63.2 Corn 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Plains 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 CO CO CO OO CO CO CC CC CC CO CC OO R01l1fl9 Grain Sorghum Plains Corn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 57.9 h2.l 21.6 78.h 0.0 0.0 32.3 67.7 CO CO OO CO Grain Sorghum Corn East Texas 0.0 08.0 52.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' 80.0 16.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 7.3 92.7 Grain Sorghum 5h.0 h6.0 Corn Gulf 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.h 99.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Coast 0.0 0.0 7-5 0.0 0.0 Rio 100.0 100.0 92-5 69.6 30.h Grain Sorghum Corn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grande Plains 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pecos- Grain Sorghum 100.0 Corn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 Plateau 51.6 0.0 Grain Sorghum Corn Desti- nation Average a/ Indicates for each destination the percent of Texas feedmill-originated grain sorghum and corn received by truck and rail. h KO Estimated Percent of Texas-Destined Grain Sorghum and Corn Shipments flfi Table 38. Texas Grain Elevators and Feedmills to Alternative Texas Regions, l970§ - - - - - - — - - --RECEIVING REGIONS -_- - - - - {g 1 Northern Southern Rio _ Shipping High High Rolling East Gulf Grande f Region Commodity Plains Plains Plains Texas Coast Plainspg % % Z % % % :?rEhern Grain Sorghum 78-5 6-7 6-“ 5-l l-5 0-l 9. Corn 82.1 6.8 2.8 0.6 3.0 0.0 Plalns W §?:§“e'" Grain Sorghum 23.0 30.0 17.2 3.9 1.7 0 6 Plains Corn 75.9 l8.2 3.2 3.2 0.0 O O 77 Rolling Grain Sorghum 6.1 0.6 62.2 27 5 0.0 0 0 .1 Plains Corn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 g‘ J l ‘I East Grain Sorghum u 2 3.8 5.1 66.8 8 5 0.9 *J Texas Corn 0 0 0.0 3.8 96.2 0 0 0.0 §; 0u1f Grain Sorghum 0.0 3.8 2.0 7.6 86.3 0.5 ] Coast Corn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.6 0.0 E; Rio . Grande Graln Sorghum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 97.2 Plains Corn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.6 67.5 Pecos- Grain Sorghum 0.0 _ 0.l 2.0 0.0 0.2 2.8 Plateau Corn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3h.h State Grain Sorghum 68.5 12.7 9.8 I3 l 0.1 2 5 Average af Corn 77.0 6.9 2.7 Q 8 6.2 0 9 §/ Indicates on a state-wide basis the percent of Texas elevators destined grain sorghum and corn shipments to each region. 50 and feedmillsil '45’ '-¥_2¢8_._..__1 64-24.21 e._1 2a- ..A.¢ 1-......__n_..22..__n }~__r; ;_.__1_._2_7 AWN» vcm xungu >n nougonmcmpu HCUULQQ pmgu .mcommoL mc_>_mum; ow m__wEnmmw new m»o~m>w_m mmxow 50;» m~coEQ_;w CLOU vcm E:£m;Om cmmgm mwogu Lo» mo~mu_uc_ \M . . m o.o o.oo_ o.o o.oo_ :.__ m.ww m.¢: m.mm Q.Q _.QQ m.- ~.- w.~ ¢.~m cgou ommLo>< N 4 M mm m.o N.QQ w.oN ~.QN N.mm m.QQ ~.o_ Q.QQ N.m_ m.mw ~.: m.mm Esnmgom c_mLu commom , mcm>_mumm Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q QLQQ QQ@QQ_Q . . . . . . . . . umoum Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q QQ_ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q QQ_ Q Q Q QQ_ Q Q Q Q EQQ LQQ Q_mLQ Q . . . . . . QQ_m_Q Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q EQ QQQQ =4M@% QQQQQQ Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q . Q.Q Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q QLQQ QQQQQ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q _m Q QQ N - Q NN Q Q Q Q EQ; LQQ QQQQQ Q_QQ Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q._~ _.Q~ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q QMQ Q QQQQ QQNQP Q.Q Q.Q $.© J © J |fi- @ C C EDI LOW cmmgu UWMQ . . . . . .Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q QQQQ mQ_Q_Q @.@ m.@Q_ @.@ @.@ @.@ @.Q Q.Nm Q.mQ ~.Q Q.~Q Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ EQQQQQQ Q.mLQ QQQ__QQ mfm-m Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.QQ_ QLQQ QQ_= ~.~ w.~m w._ ~.wm m.Q_ N.mQ ~.:_ m.mQ Q.Q ~.QQ . w.m ~.QQ ~.w m.mm Esgmkom c_mLu chmzuaom mEmZ Q Q.Q Q.QQ_ Q.Q Q.Q m_~_ N.NQ _.Qm Q.Q: Q.Q. Q.QQ m.mQ Q.Q. Q.N _-Q , QLQQ ;Q_I _.Q~ Q3 Z 2Q Ta Q.Q. IQ Q.Q T: ZQ Q._~ QQN .1 Q QQ 52.9.8 ESQ CLULUCOZ __m¢ NQQLN _mm¢ NQQQP _Qm¢ NQQLP _mmm NQQQ» _mmm NQQLP _Qm¢ NQQQF _mm¢ NUQLF >Q_QoseoQ Qo_Q@¢ N N N N N N N N N N . N N N N QQmQQ_;m =mw~m_Q mcmm_¢ ummou mmxmh mc~m_¢ mc_m_¢ mc~m_¢ umouom wucmgw wpao ummw mcm__0m am“: cm“: QQQ cposuaow ZJiZ CLUSHLQZ _..»_ .52” .315 Y ,APPENDlX A Tabie1A. Number of Fed Cattle and Calves Marketed by Crop Reporting Distnfi I969-75 3/ Crop Reporting § District 1969 1970 1971 1972 I973 1971 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - -_- - 1060 head) - - - - - - - - - -i I-N 1,161 1,812 2,186 2,750 2,908 2,551Y; 1-s 260 353 302 130 119 379 i u1+hnn+12ai1rn3di¢ ‘ii ii““” 2-~ so s1 95 89 109 91 g 2-S 179 21s 211 ' 220 199 1662 3 60 63 78 81 58 53%; 1 3 132 111 78 97 61 00 § 5-N 13 9 16 5 1 1,§ 0 5~s 12 10 9 16 7 7§ 6 97 111 111 155 199 188 E 7 15 50 57 18 62 55§ LI-‘LL D an. 1 yum-all 8-N 239 212 200 190 110 109 Q? 8-s 25 30 35 30 26 25 I 9 I0 9 5 3 3 23; 10-N 63 85 105 159 175 161f§ 10-s 19 22 29 27 19 20q§ State 2,706 3,130 3,663 1,308 1,112 3,e99;§ \'c gj Texas Livestock Statistics, U.S.D.A., Statistical Reporting 5% 1969-7s. * 52 APPENDIX B B8 P2; ea5.£% .. ‘ .11.: f2 Q. ¢.P~ @.m~ w@m>w>< zopmmm o ¢o_ ooo.oom A =mm~m_¢ m.mw ~.@~ ooo.oom w |mou@¢ m.@~ m.m~ m@@>w>< :o@mm~_ ¢.¢m o.om ¢¢o.¢@Q.m-_@¢.¢¢¢._ m¢mm_¢ +¢¢_ o oo¢.¢Q¢._-_¢¢.QQm wu¢mL@ m.~w ~.@_ ooo.oom w o_¢ TS mdv “.5963 Eimmm Q o ooQ.ooo.mA ¢.@m @.m@ Q¢¢.ooo.m-_Qo.QoQ._ @.~¢ _.~m ooo.ooo._-_oo.oom Hwmou o.m~ o.m~ oo¢.oom w »_:@ ~.@m m.m¢ @@~Lw>< eowmwm Q o@_ ooo.ooo.mA Q.¢m . o.om Q¢o.¢@¢.m-_Qo.¢oQ._ ~.@~ m.mw ¢QQ.OQo.~-_Q¢.Qom mmxmh <.- @.@~ ooo.oom w pmmw mdw 9R dmm>w>< .6231 Q @Q_ ¢Q@.QoO.m-_¢¢.Q¢O.P Q.@m Q.Qm o@o.O@o._-_QQ.QOm w¢mm_¢ ¢.~w @.~F @o@.¢@m w @¢___o¢ ¢.- @.- @@@>¢2< cowmwm ~.@@ m.mm o@@.¢Q@.mA m.mm ~.@@ @@@.¢@Q.m-_@@.@@o._ m¢_m_¢ w.- ~.- QQ@.@@@._-_QQ.oQm ;@_I @.w~ ¢.~N @@¢.@@m w ckmzpnow m.om m.@¢ wmmLw>< =o@@wm _.@ @.@@ ooo.Qoo.mA ¢.Qm @.@@ Q@@.@@@.m-_@@.QQ@.F m¢mw_¢ Q.om Q.om ¢Q@.Q@@._-_¢@.QQm £@_I m.~w ~.~P o@¢.oom v ckwgpkoz mmwvmopca mcwumopca w~Fw commux 3. _ .. . _, , . . ‘ . . , .. .1. f; V f} ._. w; ,.. "w... y .. T.‘ Q.‘ &__.w.:.._.<. u.» ~.,~......._ k ._._.I.; . . v3» . Vtkwm» wwmir». T: u: 4. t. = v3.1‘: . n. . .. .1". if . s»: is _. .. ... _ . . _» . a T L. J. . FHXL‘ i; , : x. f .14=I :33 ~..<....._ _ . \ 53 Table B2- Percent of Feedmills and Feedyards with and Without Railroad Car Grain Unloading Facilities,l97fi Firm % with % Without Region ~ Type Railroad Unloading Railroad Unloading Northern Feedmills 50.0 50.0 H' h Plains Feedyards 0.5 95.5 Southern Feedmills 29.h 70.6 H' h P:ginS Feedyards 36.h 63.6 Rolling Feedmills 15.6 0 g8fi.h Plams Feedyards 7.1 92.9 East Feedmills 25.5 70.5 T exas Feedyards 0.0 100.0 Gulf Feedmills 22.1» 77.6 Coast Feedyards l6.7 83.3 Rio Feedmills 28.6 7l.fi 2f?“ Feedyards 0.0 100.0 a|ns Pecos- Feedmills 23.l 76.9 Plateau Feedyards 33.3 ' 66.7 [Blank Page in Orilginal Bulletin] All programs and information of The Texas Agricultural Experiment Station are available to everyone without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, or national origin. Mention of a tirade _name or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by The Texas Agricultural Experiment Station and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that also may be suitable. The Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, l. E. Miller, Director, College Station, Texas. 2M—8-77 ‘