No 2 ( JANUARY 5, 1883. A miml Subscription, 104 Nos„ < SINGLE NO. " 2 CTS. \ 2,912 pages, $2.00, The Elsevir Library A Semi-Weekly Magazine. P . O. B o x 1227. JOHN B. A L D E N , P u b l i s h e r . 18 VESEY ST., NEW YORK. ANNOUNCEMENTS. T t is intended that each number of THE ELZEVIR LIBRARY shall contain a complete literary gem, a characteristic specimen of the best product of the brain of the author who is re presented. The numbers taken together will form a unique cyclopedia of the world's choicest literature. Subscriptions received for any separate numbers desired. Large discounts to Clubs. An Agent wanted in every neighborhood. The following will rapidly appear, at the prices affixed: I. Rip Van Winkle. By Washington Irving, . . . . 2 cts. II. The Burning of Rome. Early Christianity. By Canon Farrar 2 cts. III. The Words of Washington. Being Selections from the most celebrated of his papers 4 cts. IV, The Sea-Serpents of Science. By Andrew Wilson 2 cts. V. Enoch Arden. By Alfred Tennyson 2 cts. VI. Queen Mabel; Princess Gerda; Little Florence; Three Ballads, with two illustrations. By Ellen Tracy Alden 3 cts. VII. Sunshine; Moonshine; Czar and Carpenter; Three Stories, with two illustrations. By Ellen Tracy Alden 3 cts. VIII. The Traveler; The Deserted Village. By Oliver Goldsmith 2 cts. I X Of Studies; Of Adversity; Of Nobility; Of Cunning ; and other Essays. By Lord Bacon 2 cts. Great S p e c i a l Offer See last page. ANNOUNCEMENTS. The following will rapidly appear in T H E ELZEVIR LIBRAFT, but their publication will not necessarily be in the order here given: riticE 1. Rip Van Winkle. Irving.. 2 2. The Burning of Rome. Canon Farrar 2c 3. The Words of Washington. £ c. 4. Life of Washington Irving. R. H. Stoddard 6 c. 5. 8ea-Serpents of Science. Andrew Wilson 2 c. 6. Enoch Arden. Tennyson.. 2 c. 7. The Motive and Habit of Reading. Richardson 2 c. 8. Life of Frederick the Gz-eat. Macaulay — 7 c. 9. Hamlet. Shakespeare 7 c. 10. Queen Mabel, etc. With two illus. Ellen Tracy Alden 3 c 11. Sir Isaac Newton. James Parton 2 c. 12. World Smashing, etc. W. M. Williams 2 c. 13. A Half Hour in Natural History. Peabody 3 c. The above have already appeared. Banyan's Pilgrim's Progress. Complete. Illustrated 10 c. Sunshine. Three Stories, with two illus. Ellen Tracy Alden 3 c. Traveler; Deserted Village. Goldsmith 2 c. Studies : Adversity; Nobility, etc. Lord Bacon 2 c. Some Letters from J u n i u s — $ c . Battle of Chalons. C r e a s y — 2 c Fables from iCsop, with illus. 3 c Sinbad the Sailor, etc 2 c. A Journey to the Moon. With illus. Baron Munchausen. . . 3 c . Philosophy of Style. Herbert Spencer 1 c. The Civilizations of Asia. Rawlinson 2 c. Evidence of Evolution. Huxley, niuu 2 c. PRICK Buddhism. John Caird 2 c. The Crucifixion. Geikie 2 c. Seneca and St. Paul. F a r r a r . 2 c. Scenes in the Life of St. Paul. Conybeare and Howson .2 r The Celtic Hermits. Kingsley 2 Cotter's Saturday Night, etc. Robert Burns 21 The Song of the Bell, etc. Schiller 2 c. Rime of the Ancient Mariner. Coleridge 2 e, Virginia; Ivry ; The Armada. Macaulay.., 2cThe Heart of Bruce, etc. Aytoun 2 c. Songs of Seven, etc. Jean Ingelow 2 c Lady of the Lake. Sect* 8 c. Mazeppa. Lord Byron ,1c. Gertrude of Wyoming. Campbell ,. 2 e. Battle of the Books. Swift.. J 2 c. A Glimpse into Noctes Ambro-, sianae. Ch. North •, 2 c. A Half Hour with Froissart. . . 2 c . On Roast Pig, etc. Charted Lamb > 2 c. Choice Poems from Mrs. Browning 2 c. Choice Poems. Hemans 2 c. Choice Poems from oth<>r of the celebrated poets will folio w. Essay on Man. Pope 4c Rhymer for t h e Time. Oi pheus C. Kerr 2 c. History of the "Jtise and.Fal 1 of the Literary Revolution., and the Outbreak of the Rebellion." With illustration* of book-making, type-seriting by steam, etc. John I J. Alden 3c F2Hlr THE BURNING OF ROME-EARLY CHRISTIANITY. H A D it not been for one crime with which all ancient writers have mixed u p his name, Christianity might have left Nero on one side, not speaking of him, but simply looking and passing by, while he, on his part, might scarcely so much as have heard of the existence of Christians amid the crowded thousands of his capital. That crime was he burning of Rome; and by precipitating the Era of Martyrdom, it brought him into immediate and terrible connection with the Church of Christ. Whether he was really guilty or not of having ordered that immense conflagration, it is certain that he was suspected of it by his contemporaries, and has been charged with it by many historians of Ms country* It is certain, also, that his head had J>een full for years of the image of flaming cities; that he used to say that Priam was to be congratulated on having seen the ruin of T r o y ; that he was iitever able to resist the fixed idea of a crime; that the year following he gave a public recitation of a poem called Troica, from the orchestra of the theatre, and that this was only the burning of Rome under a thin disguise; and that just before his flight he meditated setting fire to Rome once more. I t was rumored that when some one h a d told him h o w Gaius used to quote the phrase of Euripides— " When J. am dead, sink the whole earth in flames 1" 2 THE ELZEVIR LIBMABY. he replied, " N a y , but while I live !" He was accused of the ambition of destroying Rome, that he might replace its tortuous and narrow lanes with broad, regular streets and uniform Hellenic edifices, and so have an excuse for changing its name from Rome to Neropolis. I t was believed that in his morbid appetite for new sensations he was quite capable of devising a truly artistic spectacle which would thrill his jaded sestheticism, and supply him with vivid imagery for the vapid antitheses of his poems. It was both believed and recorded, that during the terrors of the actual spectacle, he had climbed the Tower of Maecenas, had expressed his delight at what he called " t h e flower and loveliness of the flames," and in his scenic dress had sung jon his own private stage the " Capture of Ilium." jit was said that all attempts to quench the tire had belen forcibly resisted; that men had been seen hurling lighted brands upon various buildings, and shotting that they had orders for what they did; that men of even Consular rank had detected Nero's slaves on their own property with tow and torches, and had not ventured to touch them; that when the wind had changed, and there was a lull in the conflagration, it had burst out again from houses that abutted on the gardens of his creature Tigeliinus. At any rate, the Romans could hardly have been mistaken in thinking that Nero might have done m u c h more than he did, to encourage the efforts made to extinguish the flames. It was remembered that, a few years earlier, Claudius, during a conflagration, had t»een seen, two nights running, seated in a little courtiag-ofliee TEE BURNING OF ROME. % with two baskets full of silver at his side, to encourage the firemen, and secure the assistance of the people and the soldiers. Nero certainly, in this far more frightful crisis, did nothing of the kind. Even if some of the rumors which tended to implicate him in having caused the calamity had no better foundation than idle rumor, or the interested plots of robbers who seized the opportunity for promiscuous plunder, they acquired plausibility from the whole color of Nero's character and conversation, and they seemed to be justified by the way in which he used for his own advantage the disaster of his people. For immediately after the fire he seized a much larger extent of ground than he had previously possessed, and began to rear with incredible celerity his " Golden House," a structure unexampled in the ancient world for gorgeous magnificence. It was in this amazing structure, on which the splendor of the whole Empire was recklessly squandered, that Nero declared, with a smirk of self-satisfaction, that now at last he was lodged like a human being! But whether Nero was guilty of this unparalleled outrage on the lives and fortunes of his subjects or not, certain it is that on July 19, A. D. 64, in the tenth year of his reign, a fire broke out in shops full of inflammable materials which lined the valley between the Palatine and Caelian Hills. For six days and seven nights it rolled in streams of resistless flame over the greater part of the city, licking up the palaces and temples of the gods which covered the low hills, and raging through whole streets 4 THE ELZEVIR LIBRARY. of the wretched wooden tenements in which dwelt myriads of the poorer inhabitants who crowded the lower regions of Rome. When its course had been checked by the voluntary destruction of a vast mass of buildings which lay in its path, it broke out a second time, and raged for three days longer in the less crowded quarters of the city, where its spread was even more fatal to public buildings and the ancient shrines of the gods. Never since the Gauls burnt Rome had so deadly a calamity fallen on the afflicted city. Of its fourteen districts four alone escaped untouched; three were completely laid in ashes ; in the seven others were to be seen the wrecks of many buildings, scathed and gutted by the flames. The disaster to the city was historically irreparable. If Nero was indeed guilty, then the act of a wretched buffoon, mad with the diseased sensibility of a depraved nature, has robbed the world of works of art, and memorials, and records, priceless and irrecoverable. We can rather imagine than describe the anguish with which the Romans, bitterly coiicious of their own degeneracy, contemplated the destruction of the relics of their national glory in the days when Rome was free. What could ever replace for them or their children such monuments as the Temple of Luna, built by Servius Tullius; and the Ara Maxima, which the Arcadian Evander had reared to Hercules •. and the Temple of Jupiter Stator, built in accordance with the vow of Romulus; and the little humble palace of Numa; and the srhine of Yesta with the Penates of the Roman people and the spoils of THE BURNING OF ROME. 5 conquered kings ? What structural magnificence could atone for the loss of memorials which the song of Virgil and of Horace had rendered still more dear? The city might rise more regular from its ashes, and with broader streets, but its artificial uniformity was a questionable boon. Old men declared that the new streets were far less healthy, in consequence of their more scorching glare, and they muttered among themselves that many an object of national interest had been wantonly sacrificed to gratify the womanish freak of a miserable actor. But the sense of permanent loss was overwhelmed at first by the immediate confusion and agony of the scene. Amid the sheets of flame that roared on every side under their dense canopy of smoke, the shrieks of terrified women and the wail of infants and children were heard above the crash of falling houses. The incendiary fires seemed to be burst, ing forth in so many directions, that men stood staring in dumb stupefaction at the destruction of their property, or rushed hither and thither in helpless amazement. The lanes and alleys were blocked up with the concourse of struggling fugitives. Many were suffocated by the smoke, or trampled down in the press. Many others were burnt to death in their own burning houses, some of whom purposely flung themselves into the flames in the depth of their despair. The density of the population that found shelter in the huge many-storied lodginghouses increased the difficulty of escape; and when they had escaped with bare life, a vast multitude 9i 6 THE ELZEVIR LIBRARY. homeless, shivering, hungry human beings—many of them bereaved of their nearest and dearest relatives, many of them personally injured, and most of them deprived of all their possessions, and destitute of the means of subsistence—found themselves huddled together in vacant places in one vast brotherhood of hopeless wretchedness. Incidents like these are not often described by ancient authors. As a rule, the classic writers show themselves singularly callous to all details of individual misery. But this disaster was on a scale so magnificent, that it had impressed the imaginations of men who often treat the anguish of multitudes as a matter of course. Even if he had been destitute of every human feeling, yet policy and necessity would have induced Nero to take what steps he could to alleviate the immediate pressure. To create discontent and misery could never have formed any part of his designs. He threw open the Campus Martius, the Monumenta Agnppag, even his own gardens, to the people. Temporary buildings were constructed ; all the furniture which was most indis pensable was brought from Ostia and neighboring towns; wheat was sold at about a fourth of the average price. It was all in vain. The misery which it was believed that his criminal folly had inflicted kindled a sense of wrong too deeply seated to be removed by remedies for the past, or precautions for the future. The resentment was kept alive by the benevolences and imposts which Nero now demanded, and by the greedy ostentation with which he seized every beautiful or valuable object to adorn the THE BURNING OF ROME. 7 insulting splendor of a palace built on the yet warm ashes of so wide an area of the ruined city. Nero was so secure in his absolutism, he had hitherto found it so impossible to shock the feelings of the people or to exhaust the terrified adulation of the Senate, that he was usually indifferent to the pasquinades which were constantly holding up his name to execration and contempt. But now he felt that he had gone too far, and that his power would be seriously imperilled if he did not succeed in diverting the suspicions of the populace He was perfectly aware that when the people in the streets cursed those who set fire to the city, they meant to curse Mm. If he did not take some immediate step he felt that he might perish, as Gaius had perished before him, by the dagger of the assassin. It is at this point of his career that Nero becomes a prominent figure in the history of the Church. It was this phrase of cruelty which seemed to throw a blood-red light over his whole character, and led men to look on him as the very incarnation of the world-power in its most demoniac aspect—as worse than the Antiochus epiphanes of Daniel's Apocalypse —as the Man of Sin whom (in language figurative indeed, yet awfully true) the Lord should slay with the breath of His mouth and destroy with the brightness of His coming. For Nero endeavored to fix the odious crime of having destroyed the capital of the world upon the most inocent and faithful of his subjects—upon the only subjects who offered heartfelt prayers on his behalf—the Roman Christians. 8 THE ELZEVIR LIBRARY. They were the defenceless victims of this horrible charge ; for though they were the most harmless, they were also the most hated and the most slandered of living men. W h y he should have thought of singling out the Christians has always been a curious problem, for at this point St. Luke ends the Acts of the Apostles, perhaps purposely dropping the curtain, because it would have been perilous and useless to narrate the horrors in which the hitherto neutral or friendly Roman Government began to play so disgraceful a part. Neither Tacitus, nor Suetonius, nor the Apocalypse, help us to solve this particular problem. The Christians had filled no large space in the eye of the world. Until the days of Domitian we do not hear of a single noble or distinguished person who had joined their ranks. That the Pudens and Claudia of Rom. xvi. were the Pudens and Claudia of Martial's Epigrams seems to me to be a baseless dream. If the " foreign superstition" with which Pomponia Grsecina, wife of Aulus Plautius, the conqueror of Britain, was charged, and of which she was acquitted, was indeed, as has been suspected, the Christian religion, at any rate the name of Christianity was not alluded to by the ancient writers who had mentioned the circumstance. Even if Rom. xvi. was addressed to Rome, and not, as I believe, to Ephesus, " t h e y of the household of Narcissus which were in the Lord " were unknown slaves, as also were " t h e y of Caesar's household." The slaves and artisans, Jewish and Gentile, who formed the Christian community at Rome, had TEE BURNING OF ROME. 9 never in any way come into collision with the Roman Government. They must have been the victims rather than the exciters of the Messianic tumults—for such they are conjectured to have been—which led to the expulsion of the Jews from Rome by the futile edict of Cludius. Nay, so obedient and docile were they required to be by the very principles on which their morality was based —so far were they removed from the fierce independence of the Jewish zealots—that, in writing to them a few years earlier, the greatest of their leaders had urged upon them the payment of tribute and a submission to the higher powers, not only for wrath but also for conscience sake because the earthly ruler, in his office of repressing evil works, is a minister of God. That the Christians were entirely innocent of the crime charged against them was well known both at the time and afterwards. But how was it that Nero sought popularity and partly averted the detep rage which was rankling in many hearts against himself, by torturing men and women, on whose agonies he thought that the populace would gaze not only with a stolid indifference, but even with fierce satisfaction ? Gibbon has conjectured that the Christians were confounded with the Jews, and that the detestation universally felt for the latter fell with double force upon the former. Christians suffered even more than the Jews because of the calumnies so assiduously circulated against them, and from what appeared to the ancients to be the revolting absurdity of their peculiar tenets. "Nero," says Tacitus, 10 THE ELZEVIR LIBRARY. " exposed to accusation, and tortured with the most exquisite penalties, a set of men detested for their enormities, whom the common people called ' Christians. ' Christus, the founder of this sect, was executed during the reign of Tiberius by the Procurator, Pontius Pilate, and the deadly superstition suppressed for a time, began to burst out once more, not only throughout Judaea, where the evil had its root, but even in the City, whither from every quarter all things horrible or shameful are drifted, and find their votaries." The lordly disdain which prevented Tacitus from making any inquiry into the real views and character of the Christians, is shown by the fact that he catches up the most baseless allegations against them. He talks of their doctrines as savage and shameful, when they breathed the very spirit of peace and purity. He charges them with being animated by a hatred of their kind, when their central tenet was a universal charity. " The masses," he says, " called them ' Christians;' " and while he almost apologizes for staining his page with so vulgar an appellation, he merely mentions in passing, that, though innocent of the charge of being turbulent incendiaries, on which they were tortured to death, they were yet a setof guilty and infamous sectaries, to be classed with the lowest dregs of Roman criminals But the haughty historian throws no light on one difficulty, namely, the circumstances which led to the Christians being thus singled out. The Jews were in no way involved in Nero's persecution. To persecute the Jews at Rome would not have been an easy THE BURNING OF ROME. 11 matter. They were sufficiently numerous to be formidable, and had overawed Cicero in the zenith of his fame. Besides this, the Jewish religion was recognized, tolerated, licensed. Throughout the length and breadth of the Empire, no man, however much he andhis race might be detested and despised, could have been burnt or tortured for the mere fact of being a Jew. W e hear of no Jewish martyrdoms or Jewish presecutions till we come to the times of the Jewish war, and then chiefly in Palestine itself. It is clear that a shedding of blood—in fact, some form or other of human sacrifice—was imperatively demanded by popular feeling as an expiation of the runious crime which had plunged so many thousands into the depths of misery. In vain had the Sibylline Books been once more consulted, and in vain had public prayer been offered, in accordance with their directions, to Vulcan and the goddesses of Earth and Hades. In vain had the Roman matrons walked in procession in dark robes, and with their long hair unbound, to propitiate the insulted majesty of Juno, and to sprinkle with seawater her ancient statue. In vain had largesses been lavished upon the people, and propitiatory sacrifices offered to the gods. I n vain had public banquets been celebrated in honor of various deities. A crime had been committed, and Romans had perished unavenged. Blood cried for blood, before the sullen suspicion against Nero could be averted, or the indignation of Heaven appeased. Nero had always hated, persecuted and exiled the philosophers, and no doubt, so far as he knew any- 12 THE ELZEVIR LIBRARY. thing of the Christians—so far as he saw among his own countless slaves any who had embraced this superstition, which the elite of Rome described as not only new, but " e x e c r a b l e " and malefic" —he would hate their gravity and purity, and feel for them that raging envy which is the tribute that virtue receives from vice. Moreover, St. Paul, in all probability, had recently stood before his tribunal; and though he had been acquitted on the special charges of turbulence and profanation, respecting which he had appealed to Csesar, yet during the judicial inquiry Nero could hardly have failed to hear from the emissaries of the Sanhedrin many fierce slanders of a sect which was everywhere spoken against. The Jews were by far the deadliest enemies of the Christians; and two persons of Jewish proclivities were at this time in close proximity to the person of the Emperor. One was the pantomimist Alitnrus, the other was Poppaea, the harlot Empress. The Jews were in communication with these powerful favorities, and had even promised Nero that if his enemies ever prevailed at Rome he should have the kingdom of Jerusalem. It is not even impossible that there may have been a third dark and evil influence at work to undermine the Christians, for about this very time the unscrupulous Pharisee Flavius Josephus had availed himself of the intrigues of the palace to secure the liberation of some Jewish priests. If, as seems certain, the Jews had it in their power during the reign of Nero more or less to shape the whisper of the throne, does not historical induction drive us to conclude with some THE BURNING OF BOMB, 13 confidence that the suggestion of the Christians as scapegoats and victims came from them ? St. Clement says in his Epistle that the Christians suffered through jealously. Whose jealousy? Who can tell what dark secrets lie veiled under that suggestive word? Was Acte a Christian, and was Poppaea jealous of her? That suggestion seems at once inadequate and improbable, especially as Acte was not hurt. But there was a deadly jealousy at work against the New Religion. To the Pagans, Christianity was but a religious extravagance —contemptible, indeed, but otherwise insignificant. To the Jews, on the other hand, it was an object of hatred, which never stopped short of bloodshed when it possessed or could , usurp the power, and which, though long suppressed by circumstances, displayed itself in all the intensity of its virulence during the brief spasm of the dictatorship of Barcochba. Christianity was hateful to the Jews on every ground. It nullified their Law. It liberated all Gentiles from the heavy yoke of that Law, without thereby putting them on a lower level. It even tended to render thos« who were born Jews mdifferent to the institutions of Mosaism. It was, as it were, a fatal revolt and schism from within, more dangerous than any assault from without. And, worse than all, it was by the Gentiles confounded with the Judaism which was its bitterest antagonist. While it sheltered its existence under the mantle of Judaism, as a religio liciia, it drew down upon the religion from whose bosom it sprang all the scorn and hatred which were 14 TEE ELZEVIR LIBRARY. attached by the world to its own especial tenets; for however much the Greeks and Romans despised the Jews, they despised still more the belief that the Lord and Savior of the world was a crucified malefactor who had risen from the dead. I see in the proselytism of Poppsea, guided by Jewish malice, the only adequate explanation of the first Christian persecution. Hers was the jealousy which had goaded Nero to matricide; hers not improbably was the instigated fanaticism of a proselyte which urged him to imbrue his hands in martyr blood. And she had her reward. A woman of whom Tacitus has not a word of good to say, and who seems to have been repulsive even to a Suetonius, is handed down by the renegade Pharisee as " a devout woman "— as a worshipper of God! And, indeed, when once the Christians were pointed out to the popular vengeance, many reasons would be adduced to prove their connexion with the conflagration. Temples had perished—and were they not notorious enemies of the temples? Did not popular rumor charge them with nocturnal orgies and Thyestsean feasts? Suspicions of incendiarism were sometimes brought against Jews, but the Jews were not in the habit of talking, as these sectaries were, about a fire which should consume the world, and rejoicing in the prospect of that fiery consummation. Nay, more, when Pagans had bewailed the destruction of the city and the loss of the ancient monuments of Rome, had not these pernicious people used ambiguous language, as though they joyously recognized in these events the signs of a com- THE BURNING OF ROM®. 15 ing end. Even when they tried to suppress all outward tokens of exultation, had they not listened to the fears and lamentations of their fellow-citizens with some sparkle in the eyes, and had they not answered with something of triumph in their tones? There was a Satanic plausibility which dictated the selection of these particular victims. Because they hated the wickedness of the world,'with its ruthless games and hideous idolatries, they were accused of hatred of the whole human race. The charge of incivisme, go fatal in this Reign of Terror, was suffi. cient to ruin a body of men who scorned the sacrifices of heathendom, and turned away with abhorrence from its banquets and gaieties. The cultivated classes looked down upon the Christians with a disdain which would hardly even mention them without an apology. The canaille of Pagan cities insulted them with obscene inscriptions and blasphemous pictures on the very walls of the places where they met. Nay, they were popularly known by nicknames, like Sarmenticii and Semaxii—untranslatable terms of opprobrium derived from the fagots with which they were burned and the stakes to which they were chained. Even the heroic courage which they displayed was described as being sheer obstinacy and stupid fanaticism. But in the method chosen for the punishment of these saintly innocents Nero gave one more proof of the close connection between effeinfc nate sestheticism and sanguinary callousness. As in old days, " on that opprobrious hill," the temple of Chemosh had stood close by that of 16 THE ELZEVIR LIBRARY. Moloch, so now we find the spoliarium beside the fornices—Lust hard by Hate. The carnificina of Tiberius, at Caprese, adjoined the sella/viae. History has given many proofs that no man is more systematically heartless than a corrupted debauchee. Like people, like prince. In the then condition of Rome, Nero well knew that a nation, "cruel, by their sports to blood inured," would be most likely to forget their miseries, and condone their suspicions, by mixing games and gaiety with spectacles of refined and atrocious cruelty, of which, for eighteen centuries, the most passing record has sufficed to make men's blood run cold. Tacitus tells us that "those who confessed were first seized, and then on their evidence a huge multitude were convicted, not so much on the charge of incendiarism as for their hatred to mankind," Compressed and obscure as the sentence is, Tacitus clearly means to imply by the "confession " to which he alludes the confession of Christianity; and though he is not sufficiently generous to acquit the Christians absolutely of all complicity in the great crime* he distinctly says that they were made the scapegoats of a general indignation. The Phrase—" a huge multitude "—is one of the few existing indications of the number of martyrs in the first persecution, and of the number of Christians in the Roman Church. When the historian says that they were convcted on the charge of "hatred against mankind" he shows how completely he confounds them with the Jews, against whom he elsewhere brings the accusation of " hostile feelings toward all except themselves." THE BURNING OF HOME. 17 Then the historian adds one casual hut frightful sentence—a sentence which flings a dreadful light on the cruelty of Nero and the Roman mob. He adds "And various forms of mockery were added to enhance their dying agonies. Covered with the skins of wild beasts, they were doomed to die by the mangling of dogs, or by being nailed to crosses; or to be set on fire and burnt after twilight by way of nightly illumination. Nero offered his own garden for this show, and gave a chariot race, mingling with the mob in the dress of a charioteer, or actually driving about among them. Hence, guilty as the victims were, and deserving of the worst punishments, a feeling of compassion towards them began to rise, as men felt that they were being immolated not for any advantage to the commonwealth, but to glut the savagery of a single man." Imagine that awful scene, once witnessed by the silent obelisk in the square before St. Peter's atRome! Imagine it, that we may realize how vast is the change which Christianity has wrought in the feelings of mankind! There, where the vast dome now rises, were once the gardens of Nero. They were thronged with gay crowds, among whom the Emperor moved in his frivolous degradation—and on every side were men dying slowly on their cross of shame. Along the paths of those gardens on the Autumn nights were ghastly torches, blackening the ground beneath them with streams of sulphurous pitch, and each of those living torches was a martyr in his shirt of fire. And in the ampitheatre hard by, in sight of twenty thousand spectators, 18 THE ELZEVIR LIBRARY. famished dogs were tearing to pieces some of the best and purest of men and women, hideously disguised in the skins of bears or wolves. Thus did Nero baptize in the blood of martyrs the city which was to be for ages the capital of the world! The specific atrocity of such spectacles—unknown to the earlier ages which they called barbarous—was due to the cold-blooded selfishness, the hideous realism of a refined, delicate, aesthetic ages. To please these "lisping hawthorn-buds," these debauched and sanguinary dandies, Art, forsooth, must know nothing of morality; must accept and rejoice in a " h e a l t h y animalism;" must estimate life by the number of its few wildest pulsations; must reckon that life is worthless without the most thrilling experiences of horror or delight! Comedy must be the actual shame, and tragedy genuine bloodshed. When the play of Afranius called " T h e Conflagration" was put on the stage, a house must be really burnt, and its furniture really plundered. I n the mime called " L a u r e o l u s , " an actor must really be crucified and mangled by a bear, and really fling himself down ana deluge the stage with blood. W h e n heroism of Mucius Scsevola was represented, a real criminal must thrust his hand without a groan into the flame, and stand motionless while it is being burnt. Prometheus must be really chained to his rock, and Dirce in very fact be tossed and gored by the wild bull; and Orpheus be torn to pieces by a real bear; and Icarus must really fly, even though he fall and be dashed to death; and Hercules must ascend the funeral pyre, and there be veritably THE BUBMJSfG OF ROME. 10 burnt alive; and slaves and criminals must play their parts heroically in gold and purple till the flames envelop them. It was the ultimate romance of a degraded aad brutalized society. The Roman people, "victors once, now vile and base," could now only be amused by sanguinary melodrama. Fables must be made realities, and the criminal must gracefully transform his supreme agonies into amusements for the multitude by becoming a gladiator or a tragedian. Such were the spectacles at which Nero loved to gaze through his emerald eyeglass. And worse things than these- -things indescribable, unutterable. Infamous mythologies were enacted, in which women must play their part in torments of shamefulness more intolerable than death. A St. Peter must hang upon the cross in the Pincian gardens, as a real Laureolus upon the stage. A Christian boy must be the Icarus, and a Christian man the Scajvola, or the Hercules or the Orpheus of the amphitheatre; and Christian women, modest maidens, holy matrons, must be Danaids, i/r the Proserpine, or worse, and play their parts as priestesses of Saturn and Ceres, and in blood-stained dramas of the dead. No wonder that Nero became to Christian imagination the very incarnation or evil; the Antichrist; the Wild Beast from the abyss; the delegate of the great red Dragon, with a diadem and a name of blasphemy upon his brow. N o wonder that he left a furrow of horror in the hearts of men, and that, ten centuries after his death, the church of Bta. Maria del Popolo had to be built by Pope Pas- 20 THE ELZEVIR LIBRARY. cal I I . to exorcise from Christian Rome his restless and miserable ghost. And it struck them with deeper horror to see that the Antichrist, so far from being abhorred, was generally popular. He was popular because he presented to the degraded populace their own image and similitude. The frog-like, unclean spirits which proceeded, as it were, out of his mouth, were potent with these dwellers in an atmosphere of pestilence. They had lost all love for freedom and nobleness; they cared only for doles and excitement. Even when the infamies of a Petronius had been superseded by the murderous orgies of Tigellinus, Nero was still everywhere welcomed with shouts as a god on earth, and saluted on coins as Apollo, as Hercules, as " T H E SAVIOR OP T H E WORLD." The poets still assured him that there was no deity in heaven who would not think it an honor to concede to him his prerogatives; that if he did not place himself well in the centre of Olympus, the equilibrium oi'the "universe would be destroyed. Victims were slain along his path, and altars raised for him—for this wretch whom an honest slave could not but despise and loathe—as though he was too great for mere human honors. Nay, more, he found adorers and imitators of his execrable example—an Otho, a Yitellius, a Domitian, a Commodus, a Caracalla, an Heliogabalus—to poison the air of the world. The lusts and hungers and turies of the world lamented him and cherished his memory, and longed for his return. And yet, though all bad men—who were the ma- TEE BURNING OF BOME. M jority—admired and even loved him, he died the death of a dog. Tremendous as was the power of Imperialism, the Romans often treated their individual emperors as Nero himself treated the Syrian goddess, whose image he first worshipped with awful veneration and then subjected to the most grotesque indignities. For retribution did not linger and the vengeance fell at once on the guilty Emperor and the guilty city. " Careless seems the Great Avenger; History's pages but record One death-grapple in the darkness 'twixt false systems and the Word; Truth forever on the scaffold, wrong forever on the throne Yet that scaffold sways the future, and behind the dim unknown Standetb. God within the shadow, keeping watch above His own." The air was full of prodigies. There were terrible storms; the plague wrought fearful ravages, ~Ru