JOHN WESLEY In those clear, piercing eyes behold T h e very soul that over England flamed ! Deep, pure, intense ; consuming shame and ill ; Convicting men of sin ; making faith live ; And—this the mightiest miracle of all,— Creating God again in human hearts. Let not that image fade Ever, O God ! from out the minds of men, Of him T h y messenger and stainless priest, In a brute, sodden and unfaithful time Early a n d late, o'er land and sea on-driven ; In youth, in eager manhood, age extreme,— Driven on forever, back and forth the world, By that divine, omnipotent desire— The hunger and the passion for men's souls. R I C H A R D W A T S O N G I L D E R , 'John Wesley.' LETTERS OF J O H N WESLEY A SELECTION OF IMPORTANT AND NEW LETTERS WITH INTRODUCTIONS AND B I O G R A P H I C A L GEORGE EAYRS, N O T E S BY F.RHIST.S. WITH A CHAPTER ON Wesley, His Times and Work BY THE EIGHT HONOURABLE AUGUSTINE BIRRELL K . C , M.P. A PORTRAIT OF WESLEY AND LETTERS IN FACSIMILE HODDER AND STOUGHTON LONDON NEW YORK TORONTO 1915 B W514w1l TO T H E DEAR AND SACRED MEMORY OF MY MOTHER A MYSTIC AND WHO CONQJJERED A METHODIST LIKE WESLEY BY PRAYER AND HOLY SONG PREFACE wrote many letters. Some thousands of them have been traced; doubtless more are in existence. Many of his letters are short and unimportant. The perusal of them all is a task which would be essayed by few, albeit everything is interesting which came from the hand of ' the St. John of England,' the leader of the evangelical revival of religion in the eighteenth century and the human founder of Methodism, now a world-wide communion of more than thirty millions. This is the first selection of representative letters by Wesley, and the largest collection of his letters since that given in his works (third edition, 1829), from which many here given are drawn. The letters have been selected from this and other sources on the ground of their representative character, of the importance of the subject-matter, or of the fact that they are new or little known. About seventy of those here given may be regarded as new. They have not been published before, or only in fugitive or private form ; they are not accessible in the great Public Libraries. Of many of them no note is taken in works on Wesley. These ' new' letters are marked N in the list of dates, titles, and sources of letters given on page xix. Among them are some of the finest letters Wesley ever wrote. Many other vii JOHN WESLEY JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS letters are here more completely given than hitherto. A letter to his mother (page 44) is thus doubled in length. Genuine letters by Wesley are now supported by several degrees of authenticity. Some are holograph, wholly written in his handwriting, and they also bear marks of passage through the post, or reception by those to whom he sent them. His handwriting was clear, pretty, scholarly, and quite distinctive all through his life, as is shown by the facsimiles here given of letters written by him when he was thirty-one, sixty-four, and eighty-four years of age respectively (see pages 64, 400, 464). Of other letters which he wrote, Wesley made and kept a draft in each case. This he endorsed. Other drafts, or copies of his letters, were made by his helpers, some of whom imitated his handwriting very closely and his free use of capital letters (see pages 58 and 99). Some of these drafts or copies Wesley endorsed. This is the case with his famous letter to Pitt (see page 483). Other drafts and copies exist without his endorsement. The text of these has the authority of his characteristic composition or of publication during his lifetime by those who had the originals, some of which cannot now be traced. Letters of all these values are here given. The genuineness of them all is undoubted. I t was from the Rev. James Everett that the Rev. Luke Tyerman received many Wesley letters and other materials which made his Life of Wesley a storehouse to which all subsequent writers on the subject are indebted. From it I have drawn some letters. But Everett did not part with all his Wesleyana. Amongst treasures retained was a volume containing holograph letters by Wesley and viii PREFACE others, ' T h e Everett Collection,' which I have here used. Some years ago the late venerable and beloved Rev. Edward Boaden handed to me for use, according to my discretion, other Everett manuscripts, his diary (used in part in his Life by Rev. R. Chew issued by the present Publishers), and many letters, etc., some of even tragic interest, as all who know Everett's skill as a literary collector and the part he played in Methodist history in the last century will understand. Some of these materials were used by me in A New History of Methodism- Others are used here. Other new letters are from the unique Colman Collection, and from other sources acknowledged in the list or in the text. With these helps, Wesley's letters to his most intimate lay friend Ebenezer Blackwell and also those to Wesley's most distinguished follower in Scotland, Lady Maxwell, are given more completely than ever before. The letters to his chief preachers and to eccentric Thomas Wride and others, many of them new letters, are typical of a host of such which he dispatched to his helpers as they changed the face of England. Few readers will omit his letters, some of them little known, to young people and to public men. The chapter of letters to American and Canadian Methodists gives together for the first time, and with important additions, Wesley's messages to those lands in which his followers were to become so numerous. Volumes of letters are unwelcome to some because they take too much for granted on the part of readers. It is hoped that the introductory chapters to the letters, and the explanatory paragraphs given with separate letters ix JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS or groups of them, will remove this difficulty. Without these ' elucidations,' as Carlyle styles them in his Letters of Oliver Cromwell, letters may not mean much except to the expert. I t may be added that the substance of these introductions was given as lectures in the United States and Canada in the Autumn of 1914. One found that the interest in Wesley is undying; and it grows. The titles here given to the letters are culled from them. They often indicate the chief topic, or give a Wesley counsel or command. The chapter on Wesley and his Times and Work, by the Right Honourable Augustine Birrell, K.C., M.P., sets Wesley before us in quite an inimitable way. I am greatly indebted to Mr. Birrell for permission to use it, and for the important additions made to it. With characteristic kindness he had promised me to give an address on Wesley in the United Methodist Church, Milk Street, Bristol, but he was prevented from so doing. My cordial thanks are due to several friends for ready access to private collections of Wesley manuscripts. I must name Mr. and Mrs. Russell J. Colman of Norwich, and their representative, Mr. Alexander W. Newman; Past Principal the Rev. Thomas Sherwood, the Rev. Principal David Brook, M.A., D.C.L., and the Rev. W. H. Cory Harris, Secretary of Victoria Park United Methodist College, Manchester, for the loan of the Everett Collection; and the Rev. J. S. Clemens, B.A., D.D., Governor of the United Methodist College, Ranmoor, Sheffield. The facsimile letters given are from the Colman and Everett Collections. Some Wesley letters from the Moravian x PREFACE archives, Fetter Lane, London, of which I was courteously permitted the use for Wesley and Kingswood and the Free Churches, have again been used. For permission to copy letters in the great Public Libraries, and for much courtesy received while doing so, I am indebted to the Keeper of Manuscripts, British Museum, London; the Librarian of the Bodleian Library, Oxford; Mr. A. E. Guppy, M.A., of the John Rylands Library, Manchester; and the Keeper of the Manuscripts, Public Library, Copley Square, Boston, U.S.A. The President (the Rev. E. S. Tipple, Ph.D., D.D., LL.D.) and Professor J. A. Faulkner, M.A., D.D., of the Drew Methodist Episcopal Theological Seminary, Madison, New Jersey, U.S.A.; the Chancellor of Victoria College and University, Toronto, Canada (the Rev. R. P. Bowles, M.A., LL.D.), and Professor A. E. Lang, M.A., Librarian, have all laid me under special obligation for their brotherly interest in this work. A t Drew and Victoria noble libraries of Methodist manuscripts and literature are being built up of importance to Methodist students in all lands. A short list of authorities to which I am indebted is given. I gratefully pay my small tribute to the genius, unwearied industry and personal kindness of the late Rev. Nehemiah Curnock, who, with the help of experts, has given us the standard edition of Wesley's Journal. Mr. G. H. Leonard, M.A., Professor of Modern History in Bristol University, greatly heartened me as he saw this work in progress. My nephew, the Rev. A. J. G. Seaton, B.D., Superintendent of Edinburgh Wesleyan Mission, has helped me to some facts concerning Lady Maxwell. The Rev. xi JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS William Wakinshaw, and the Rev. Archibald Harrison, B.D., B.Sc., of Bristol, have rendered the costly kindness of reading the work in proof, and they and the Rev. Thomas E. Brigden have offered valuable suggestions. Mr. Leonard J. Snook and our daughter, Winifred, have rendered much clerical assistance. Our son Charles has helped also. Notwithstanding all this kind help, and my best endeavours, I cannot hope that in dealing with all the material and facts involved in this work I have avoided all mistakes. For these I ask pardon. The kind patience of the Publishers, for whom, soon after the publication of the History named above, I undertook this task, must also be acknowledged. To that work this is in some ways a supplemental volume. In her delightful work The Old Testament in Life and Literature, Miss J. T. Stoddart quotes Luther's saying that ' No one can understand Cicero's Letters unless he has been engaged for twenty-five years in a great commonwealth.'' More than that number of years ago I became one among the thousands of preachers who serve the commonwealth of Methodism. I was drawn into wondering admiration of Wesley and his work, and began to feel the spell and stimulus of his character. Since then, helped by many whom I hold in grateful remembrance, I have learned to think of him, not as he is often regarded and represented, as immaculate, a plaster saint, and almost infallible, but far otherwise: as a young growing man, struggling, sinning, sorrowing, praying, moving upward and onward by Divine help; as in his later days mounting to self-mastery and shining serenity; as high and lifted up, a genius and a xii PREFACE dedicated spirit, but also a creature not too bright and good to be followed afar off, in so far as he followed Christ, by the humblest. His strong, gravely beautiful face looks down upon me in many forms from my study walls, and he seems to sing his living and dying faith, mingled of humility and confidence: ( I the chief of sinners am. But Jesus died for me,' and anon to utter one of his golden counsels: ' Never be unemployed; never be triflingly employed ; never while away time.'' G. E. xiii CONTENTS Frontispiece—J OWN WESLEY, JEtat 50. FROM THE BUST BY ROUBILIAC I N T H E N A T I O N A L G A L L E R Y , LONDON. ' JOHN WESLEY/ B Y RICHARD WATSON GILDER. PAGE PREFACE, . . . . . . . vii LIST OF LETTERS SELECTED, WITH SOURCES AND AUTHORITIES, xix INTRODUCTORY NOTE, 1 BOOK I John Wesley and His Letters CHAPTER I THE MAN, JOHN WESLEY, . . . . . 5 CHAPTER II JOHN WESLEY, HIS TIMES AND WORK. B Y THE RIGHT HON- OURABLE AUGUSTINE BIRRELL, K.C., M.P., . . 9 CHAPTER I I I JOHN WESLEY'S LIFE IN OUTLINE, . . . . 2 5 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS BOOK II A Selection from the Letters of John Wesley CHAPTER I PAGE J O H N W E S L E Y AS A L E T T E R W R I T E R , . . . . 3 1 C H A P T E R II To H I S FATHER AND M O T H E R — T H E R E V . SAMUEL W E S L E Y , M. A., AND M R S . SUSANNA W E S L E Y , . . . . 3 9 Wesley's Letter to his Mother, January 13, 1734-5, in facsimile. From the Golman Collection, . . CHAPTER To His 64 III BROTHERS AND S I S T E R — T H E R E V . SAMUEL W E S L E Y , J U N R . , M.A., WESLEY, R E V . CHARLES W E S L E Y , AND MISS MARTHA . . . . CHAPTER . . . 56 IV CONCERNING THE METHODISTS AND METHODISM, . . 93 To James H u t t o n and t h e Moravians, Rev. George Whitefield, M.A., A Serious Clergyman, A Friend, A Worshipper among t h e Methodists, T h e Countess of Huntingdon, the Editor of Lloyd's Evening Post, Bishop Lowth, and others. CHAPTER V To SOME OF THE C H I E F METHODIST PREACHERS, . To t h e Rev. J o h n W . Fletcher, J o h n Nelson, Duncan W r i g h t , Christopher Hopper, Joseph Benson, Samuel Bradburn, Robert Carr Brackenbury, Adam Clarke, Dr. Coke, xvi 137 CONTENTS C H A P T E R VI PAGE To ECCENTRIC THOMAS W R I D E , STEADY JOSEPH TAYLOR, AND OTHER METHODIST PREACHERS, . . . . 183 i. T. Wride ; n . J . T a y l o r ; in. T. T a y l o r ; iv. J . O d d i e ; v. Various. CHAPTER To AMERICAN THEM, AND CANADIAN . . . VII METHODISTS . AND . CONCERNING . . 237 To t h e Rev. Lawrence Coughlan, Rev. George W h i t e field, George Shadford, Thomas Rankin, James Dempster, J o h n King, William Black, Dr. Coke, Rev. Francis Asbury, J o h n Stretton, Freeborn Garrettson, J o h n Mann, Ezekiel Cooper. CHAPTER To H I S MOST INTIMATE LAY F R I E N D , E B E N E Z E R BLACKWELL, . CHAPTER To VIII 288 IX H I S W I F E AND SOME LADY F R I E N D S , . . . 353 To Mrs. J o h n Wesley, Mrs. Mary Fletcher, Mrs. Sarah Crosby, Miss Sarah Mallett, Miss Nancy Bolton, Miss Peggy Dale, Miss Loxdale, Mrs. Hester Ann Rogers, Miss Elizabeth Ritchie. CHAPTER To LADY MAXWELL, . . . X . . . Wesley's Letter to Lady Maxwell, June 7,1767> in facsimile. From the Everett Collection, . . . . b 382 400 xvii JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS CHAPTER XI PAGE To YOUNG FRIENDS AND OTHERS—CONCERNING ING, LITERARY EARNESTNESS, . S T Y L E , SLEEP, H E A L T H , . . . LIFE, AND . LEARN- RELIGIOUS . . 420 To Samuel Furley, Charles Wesley, J u n r . , Samuel Wesley, J u n r . , Miss Sarah Wesley, a Young Disciple, J o h n Bredin, James Knox, Rev. Dr. Leslie. Wesley's Letter to the Rev. Dr. Leslie, June 16, 1787, in facsimile. From the Colman Collection, . . CHAPTER ON 464 XII PUBLIC MATTERS AND TO PUBLIC M E N , . . . 461 To King George n . , T h e Mayor of Newcastle (Alderman Ridley) and General Husk, the Hon. James West, t h e Mayor and Corporation of Bristol, t h e Prime Minister (Lord North), the Officer of Excise, On Voltaire, to Lord Shelburne, t h e Right Hon. William P i t t , M . P . , A Member of Parliament, William Wilberforce, M . P . INDEX, xvm 491 LIST OF JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS GIVEN IN THIS VOLUME, IN ORDER OF THEIR DATE, W I T H TITLES, AND SOURCES OF LETTERS, AND SOME AUTHORITIES USED. I LIST OF LETTERS N indicates that the letter is new or little known. DATE 1*2^ TITLE IN THE TEXT J u n e 18. Bishop Taylor says, ' W h e t h e r God has forgiven us or no, we know n o t / SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE IN THIS VOL. Works 1727 January. Curiosity . . . if we had half a dozen centuries of life to come, . „ Mar. 19. Implant what habits I would before the flexibility of youth be over, . Colman Coll. [July 18. A letter from Wesley's father, . Everett Coll.] 40 42 44 48 1731 J u n e 11. Our little company [the Oxford Methodists] is shrunk into almost none at all, Works 50 1733 J u n e 13. Diminution of fortune, friends, and reputation, „ 52 1734/5 } N Jan. 13. The subject of Christian liberty, . Colman Coll. 53 (In facsimile a l s o ; see page 64.) xix LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE 1 f7Qg TITLE IN T H E T E X T Mar. 4. I can better serve God and His church in my present station, . SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE IN THIS VOL. Works 1738 April 4. The whole question turns on matter of fact, ,, Aug. 4. The people here, Herrnhut, Ger- (C. Wesley's! many, \ Life J Oct. 30. In this sense I was not a Christian till May the 24th last past, . . Works 1739 April 9. If this work be of God . . . who shall overthrow it ? . . . Moravian Coll. June 7. Turning to Nash she said, 6 Sir, we come for the food of our souls. You care for your body,' „ ,, 23. If it be just to obey men rather than God, judge ye, . . . Works [Aug. 14. A letter from Blackwell to Wesley, Colman Coll.] „ 23. God is greatly with this people, . Works 1741 April 21. I glean after Whiten eld . . . 1 dare in no wise join the Moravians, . Colman Coll. „ 27. It is a poor case that you and I must be talking thus, . . . . „ N „ „ Let us deal openly with one another, „ 56 58 69 61 95 99 70 291 294 73 104 221 1744 Mar. 5. To tender our most dutiful regards to your sacred Majesty, . . . May —. We shall cry out together, . . . we are more than conquerors, . . Works 463 „ 147 1745 Sept. 21. I reverence you for your office and your zeal, Oct. 8. I am ready to pull the house down, . xx Journal „ 465 466 LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE TITLE IN THE TEXT 1745 Oct. 26. The poor men to whom our lives are entrusted, . . . . . SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE IN THIS VOL. Journal 467 1746 J a n . 26. You have suffered loss for want of frank acknowledgement of t h e truths 295 Works 1747 May 14. All this is poison to your soul, J u l y 18. Now t h e r e is not a dog to wag his tongue, Aug. 13. For natural sweetness . . . I have never seen any people like t h e Irish, . . . . . . 295 297 298 1748 Feb. 2. Shall you have no part in t h e general blessing? . . . . . Mar. 15. Even t h e accounts between God and your own soul, . . . . April 20. Perhaps God was jealous over you, . May 4. Every man has authority to save t h e life of a dying man . . . every Christian to save souls, Aug. 14. A complete library for those t h a t fear God, . . . . . 303 1749 Mar. 28. A letter from my brother, Oct. 2. You have been much upon my mind, Dec. 18. A proper object of charity, 305 306 307 1750 Feb. 4. Money you left in my hands, . 301 302 107 . J u l y 21. H u g e applause and huge opposition, \ 1751 Mar. 300 5. Advise and comfort her who is now likely to stand in need of every help, „ M " Works 308 R " Y 309 312 xxi LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE T I T L E IN T H E T E X T 1751 April 7. Her that is as my own soul, May 14. My wife she has many trials, . July 3. There is a fair prospect on every side, SOURCE OF LETTER Works 1752 April 16. Have we any time to lose in this span of life? . . . . May 23. The sale of books . . . which of these ways should you j udge most proper? July 20. If you had faithful friends you would swiftly advance, . . . . 1753 May 16. I often tremble for you, . . . ,, 28. Natural cheerfulness of temper may easily slide into an extreme, . Oct. 20. I give you a dilemma, . . PAGE I N THIS VOL. .\ ' a 312 313 314 „ 316 „ 317 ,, 319 „ 320 „ 321 >> ^ Y 1754 Jan. 5. The greatest instruments of my recovery, . . . . . Works Mar. 30. Make and keep one resolution, . Life Sept. 24. These hints are not a mark of disesteem, but of sincerity, . . Works Dec. 7. Further than this you are not called f U.M.F.G. \ at present, . . . . KMag., 1866J 75 323 422 324 424 1755 N April 9. When one is willing then the other /Victoria Coll., \325 flies off, \ Toronto J „ 29. You love both the contending parties, Colman Coll. 327 June 20. Here is Charles Perronet raving . . . and Charles Wesley. . . and I in the midst staring, . . . . Works 77 Aug. 31. In my present journey I leap as broken from chains, „ 328 Sept. 12. This has raised a violent storm, . „ 329 xxii LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE T I T L E IN T H E T E X T SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE IN T H I S VOL. 1756 U.M.F.C. Feb. 18o I would engage to take any person, J -j Magazine, V 425 and teach him in seven years, . 1 ••} „ 2 1 . Never write to t h a t person at all, nor of her, Mar. 1. I will do what a good subject ought, ,, „ An offer of raising a company of volunteers, . . . . . „ 4. Some way of managing elections without embittering Englishmen, . ,, 14. Fight, Sammy, fight! . , „ Works 427 331 Life 470 Works r U.M.F.C. -\ A Magazine, Y I Apr. 16. Are you stark, staring mad ? . . ,, 19. All here are as safe as if they were already in Paradise, . . . 427 1866 J ,, 428 Works 332 1757 AT J a n . 8. All is best, Everett Coll. May 28. Business t h a t will endure, . . Works „ 30. Not delivered till I was gone, ]est you should think I wanted anything, . . . . . . Colman Coll. Sept. 20. T h e unspeakable advantages which t h e Methodists enjoy in regard to public worship, . . . . Works 1758 J u n e 5. T h e letters I received were open, . July 12. So eloquent a Person at your elbow, 331 ,, ,, 220 333 455 113 335 336 1759 Mar. 2. I do not speak: it would be lost labour, Colman Coll. 337 [ „ —. Blackwell's reply to Wesley, . . „ ] 338 „ 12. W e are at present upon pretty good terms, Works 340 xxiii LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE TITLE IN THE T E X T 1760 Mar. 17. A line in behalf of a worthy man, April 26. In every trial observe the hand of God, SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE IN THIS VOL. Works 341 342 )> Wes. Meth. ) May 7. The late proceedings of the French j Magazine, Y 346 here, 1848 J Sept. 28. God's dealings with us have been extraordinary, . . . . Works 78 1761. Feb. 14. You have not gone too far, . . Mar. 24. In God's name, one of you go into that round, . . . . . „ 362 „ 149 June 14. Did you not thoroughly understand f _ " . ') • * u t. X _ T JT J - :>i Magazine, Y 65 what my brother and I were doing ? I * 'J July 16. A tender point . . . where there is a Gospel ministry already, . . Works 344 Aug. 15. We have amicably compromised, . „ 345 Dec. 26. Quack medicine and namby-pambical hymns, „ 80 1762 Jan. 5. There is need of a lady's hand as well as a lion's heart, ,, 18. Do just as I would do if I were in your place, . . . . . ,, 25. The care of a parish is, indeed, a weighty thing . . . . „ 82 „ 150 Life 429 c Wes. Meth. \ July 28. We are not proprietors here, but J \ Magazine, J- 347 only tenants at will, *I „ 30. Forty or fifty people . . . the happiest and holiest in the kingdom, . . Oct. 13. Do you believe evil tempers remain | till death? . . . . •{ 1848 J Life 431 '"* ' .' ' 1 ^1™') 432 [No date.] I was thinking on Christian perfec-/C. Wesley's! tion, t Life J xxiv 83 LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS T I T L E IN T H E T E X T 1763 NJuly SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE IN T H I S VOL. Drew "\ Seminary, I Madison, f New Jersey J 148 ( 1764 May 16. A great desire of union between the preachers of the Gospel, Colman Coll. Works J u n e 20. Be not afraid to know yourself, J u l y 10. Do not stop one moment^ ,, 11. You are not in t h e society. W h y not? J> „ 14. Apprehensions lest t h a t chariot should cost you your life, „ 15. W h a t is it t h a t constitutes a good style? Aug. 17. Faith, living, conquering, faith, is undoubtedly the thing you want, . Colman Coll. Sept. 22. At present but a tender, sickly plant ? Works ) } ) j ) } 119 384 386 116 349 436 387 389 r U.M.F.G. \ Oct. 11. I may say, 1 know a good style from I Magazine, Ja bad one, . . . . . l 1866. 438 J Dec. 20. Most of t h e present stage entertainments are peculiarly hateful to a trading c i t y , . . . . . „ Works 471 c U.M.F.G. \ —. I t might have pleased God to make | Magazine, V 433 you a wit too, . . . . I 1866 J 1765 May 25. I found the same openness and sweetness . . . tenderness and steadiness, . . . . . . J u l y 5. Light in an instant or by degrees, . N Sept. 9. I have no objection to your speaking, Dec. 1. T h a t strange reserve which prevails, in North Britain, . . . . Works See text Works 391 393 226 395 XXV LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE \>7QQ T I T L E IN T H E T E X T SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE IN T H I S VOL. Feb. 28. Come let us arise and shake ourselves, Works May 6. Let us mend our pace, . . . „ „ „ Trial did not turn you out of the way, „ N June 22. Our late conversations, . . . Everett Coll. iVJuly 8. The safest step, „ 1767 Feb. 23. Your health . . . and the peace of God, Works Mar. 5. By these marks the Methodists desire to be distinguished, . . . „ N May 7. I begin to be full of fears, . . Everett Coll. (In facsimile also ; see page 400.) June 4. Providentially called . . . where you now are . . . you will be preserved, . . . . . Works „ 21. Concerning the work of God in these kingdoms, . . . . . , , Aug. —. Pray dispatch letters. You have a ready mind, and a ready pen, . „ N Dec. 15. Wherever this is dropped, you drop me, Everett Coll. 1768 N Jan. 12. Go on, go on, in God's name ! . . „ „ 15. A son, father, grandfather preaching the genuine Gospel, . . . Works N Feb. 14. Push on the collection, . . . Everett Coll. Mar. 20. One had need to be an angel to converse three or four hours, . . Works N April 7. I have answered every letter, . . See text Aug. —. That perfection which I have taught these forty y e a r s , . . . . Works „ —. You spared no pains in nursing me, . . . . . . Life N Sept. 9. A Christian after the common rate. No! Everett Coll. xxvi 85 350 396 307 398 399 121 400 402 85 152 218 219 88 220 139 370 238 355 404 LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE T I T L E IN T H E T E X T SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE IN THIS VOL. 1768 tWes.Meth.\ . -J Magazine, JI 1845 J Nov. 7. An ounce of love is worth a pound of knowledge, Works Dec. 17. I have neither leisure nor inclination to write a book, . . . . , , ,, 22. Interposing other books is not good husbandry, . . . . . ,, Oct. 6. Money never stays with me, . 1769 JV Feb. 18. Stewards are not to govern our societies, Everett Coll. Mar. 3. An apprehension of a deceased friend, Works April 29. Concerned t h a t you were unwell, . „ May 27. I was never afraid of any but t h e almost Christians, . . . ,, . c Bodleian ^ J5odleian JV J u l y 4. A providential connexion, A Library, I I Oxford J 1770 r Drew \ JV J a n . 1. God is willing to give always what) Seminary, I H e gives once, . . . . | Madison, | iNew Jersey J ,, 15. The welfare of t h e family. Beware of increasing your expenses, . Works Feb. 17. Live t o - d a y ! „ „ 21. I may pay another visit to t h e New World, „ / British ^ JV May 12. I live from hand to mouth, . . • Museum, V < ( London J Oct. 3. They will find fault because I say it, Works JV Nov, 24. A parent has in this case a negative J c ,, 66 154 89 155 230 405 407 156 222 363 359 408 242 223 157 1 V0ice > iToroToJ Dec. 28. One point hold fast: Let neither men nor devils tear it from you, . Works 160 xxvii LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE 1*7>7\ T I T L E IN T H E T E X T SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE IN T H I S VOL. J a n . 24. I never preach in a controversial way, Works N Feb. 14. Labour to be steadily serious, weighty in conversation, and to walk humbly and closely with God, . Everett Coll. „ 26. The preachers . . . felt a damp upon their spirits, . . . . Works May 28. The Bible gives us no authority to think ill of any one, „ J u n e 13. Your having an extraordinary call, . ,, N „ 23. Let all that were of the Church keep to the Church, . . . . Everett Coll. J u l y 13. There may be self-approbation which is not sin, . . . . . Works N Sept. 7. Be zealous, serious, active, . . E v e r e t t Coll. 1772 Feb. am going to America to t u r n Bishop, Works ,, 8. Easier to lose love than to find truth, „ N April 3. The second blessing . . . receivable in a moment, . . . . See text N J u n e 30. Be exact in everything, . . . Everett Coll. . U.M.F.C. rU.M.F.C.^ / I Magazine, jexcluded, * I 1862 J 1862 N Nov. 5. Suffer none to ride over your head. Only be mild, . . . . Everett Coll. N Dec. 16. Miss no congregation, at t h e peril of his life, „ 185 411 449 360 186 451 186 1. I 1773 J a n . —. Thou art t h e m a n ! . . . . Works Mar. —. I let you loose on t h e great continent of America, „ N April 15. Pay . . . what is due to him, . . Everett Coll. xxviii 409 278 412 224 187 229 187 188 141 244 188 LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE I^Q TITLE IN THE TEXT SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE IN THIS VOL. J u l y 18. Two or three little things I have sent you, Works ,, 21. The people generally are prejudiced in your favour, . . . . Life Sept. 8. W h e n we have to do with children, Works ,, 15. Are you out of your wits ? . . „ Oct. 23. To sit still in one place is neither for t h e health of our souls nor bodies, . . . . . . ,, N Nov. 12. Be gentle to all men, . . . Everett Coll. N Dec. 4. Go on hand in hand, trusting in Him t h a t loves you, to overturn America, „ 366 144 452 225 162 188 245 1774 Jan. 8. You are in danger of reading too much, Works N „ 22. W e r e we to engage little poets, we should be overrun, . . . Everett Coll. May 8. I would have you j ust such an one as Miranda, Works July 21. Your little conference in Philadelphia, . . . . . Life iV Aug. 29. Alas ! alas ! . . . I have no heart to send you anywhere. You have neither lowliness nor love, . . Everett Coll. 1775 N Feb. 24. I do not say they defraud, but I say they act unkindly, . . . Mar. 1. I advise Brother Asbury to return to England, Mar. .1. In so critical a situation it is your part to be peacemakers, . . Apr. 2 1 . I am sorry for poor T. R., . . May 19. Wherever war breaks out, God is forgotten, 163 189 378 246 190 ,, 191 Works 248 ,, ,, 248 249 „ 250 xxix LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE T I T L E IN T H E T E X T 1775 May 19. By every possible means, oppose party spirit, . . . . 33 29. An opportunity of hiding myself day or two, . . . . June 13. The sword is drawn ! SOURCE OF LETTER a . a . PAGE IN THIS VOL. Works 33 33 Is it common sense to use force to- c Wesley \ Banner', \ wards the Americans ? . { 1849 J N July 22. Your language is such as an archangel would not use to the Devil, Everett Coll. „ 28. I was at the gates of death, Works ,, ,, The temple is built even in troublous times, . . . . . . 33 ,, „ Scream no more, at the peril of your soul, 33 Aug. 13. It will be seen what God will do with North America, . . . . 33 Oct. 20. A little tract. . . . Many would willingly burn me and it together, 33 Dec. 26. Cut off all other connexion with them than we have with Holland or Germany, . . . . 33 15. 1776 May 3. Can you, notwithstanding this, rejoice evermore? . . . . Sept. 9. I have . . . silver tea-spoons, . . Nov. 26. Taking opium is full as bad as taking drams, 360 256 473 192 252 257 253 253 254 152 Works Life 374 478 Works 164 1777 N Jan. 17. You will give a good account of the circuit, Everett Coll. May 3. I want heat more than light, . . Works N May 7. The summer is before us, . . Everett Coll. Sept. 9. I blame all when they speak the truth other than in love, . . See text XXX 252 192 414 193 231 LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE J»7lTg T I T L E IN T H E T E X T SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE IN T H I S VOL. N April20. I cannot see any objection to your choosing her, . . . . Everett Coll. ? Circa. At length know me and know yourself, See text 1779 Jan. 194 356 4. Voltaire . . . head pays ment, . 11. Does nobody to whom a crowned such a violent compli. . . . . Life 479 „ care for this ? . . „ 235 rUnited Metho-^ Feb. 11. That wretched infidel, . . \ dist College, U 8 0 I „ N Aug. Sept. iVNov. 12. 10. 27. 1. Sheffield J This revival of religion will continue, Works You know, love is full of fears, . Everett Coll. W h a t is mine is yours, . . . Works A mere groundless imagination, . Everett Coll. 1780 Jan. —. They cannot join with me any longer than they are directed by me, . Works N Mar. 9. You mean well even where you j u d g e ill, Everett Coll. Aug. 10. Persons who knew no more of saving souls than of catching whales. . . . I mourn for poor America, . • Works JV Dec. 14. You might now be useful, . . Everett Coll. 1781 Jan. 2. Afflictive circumstances that have followed you . . . t h a t you may learn obedience, . . . . Mar. 27. Always f think a l o u d ' whenever you f speak or write to me, . . •{ April 2. That one word, Grace, . . . July 17. The grand hindrance . . . what very few people are aware of—intemperance in sleep, . . . . Works 379 194 167 195 125 195 127 196 368 es e ^ 1 m T j Works Life 164 445 xxxi LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE •J'70-1 TITLE IN T H E T E X T SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE IN THIS VOL. Aug. 4. There is a debt of love which I f C . W e s l e y ' s ) should have paid before now, .\ Life i Sept. 4. Desire for knowledge. . . . W h a t course you may take, I will point out, Life ,, 8. As your business . . . calls you into t h e fire, I t r u s t you will not be burned, „ „ 24. You and I may speak freely to each other, ,, Nov. 24. Let Sister Fletcher do as much as she can for God, and no more, . Works 447 441 148 146 1782 Mar. 9. I give it u n d e r my hand . . . you are welcome to preach in any of our preaching-houses, „ Apr. 12. There is t h e t r u e picture of Christian perfection, . . . . ,, JV Sept. 9. Such a work in Cornwall as never was yet, Everett Coll. JV „ 24. The books . . . should be kept by t h e assistant, . . . . „ JV Oct. 19. Tracts and magazines, . . „ r Rylands -\ JV Nov. 30. Change of air, -J Library, I I Manchester J JV Dec. 3. T h e question is, Methodism or no Methodism, Everett Coll. „ 7. A motion in Parliament for raising t h e militia and exercising them on Sunday, Works 1783 J a n . 4. Trust God, and speak as well as you can, ,, 10. He calls you not so much to act as to suffer, xxxii 168 372 209 209 210 454 130 481 „ 169 ,, 170 LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE ]7gg TITLE IN THE TEXT SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE IN THIS VOL. iVJan. 16. Should trustees place and displace preachers ? Everett Coll. „ 16. W e shall not build any more in haste, Life JSF Feb. 25. Enlarge the house. . . . Remember, light enough and air enough, . Everett Coll. „ 26. I have great hopes we shall then be able to send you assistance, Life Mar. 16. One of our sisters here told us a particular dream, . . . . „ ,, 25. Tell Brother Ridel not to please the f British ^ Devil by preaching himself to j Museum, j death, . . . . . I London J April 21. Your kind reproof. . . . I cannot write without tears, . . , Life N „ 26. Do all you can during this precious season, Everett Coll. N J u n e 5. According to t h e printed Minutes, . „ J u l y 13. Swift increase is generally followed by decrease equally swift, . . Life N Dec. 24. Concerning t h e building of preaching-houses, Everett Coll. 1784 J a n . 10. W h e n I was young I had abundance of infirmities, . . . . Life N „ 12. T h e books, Everett Coll. ( Drew 130 210 211 259 375 166 460 211 212 260 212 455 213 -\ llfedis^ I 232 New Jersey J May 11. See that ye fall not out by the way, Life 261 Aug. 19. If you are not born of God, you a r e f C . Wesley's \ ^ of no Church, . . . A Life J N Aug. 30. The preachers going to America, . Everett Coll. 213 c xxxiii LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE JlTgJ TITLE IN THE TEXT SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE IN THIS VOL. Sept. 6. New taxes . . . smuggling villains, the Distillery . . . that scandal of the English nation—suicide,, . Life Sept. 10. My scruples are at an end . . . I violate no order by appointing and sending labourers into the harvest, Works Oct. 15. Is it not advisable that you act by united counsels ? . . . . Life N „ 31. I t might be productive of much good, See text 1785 Feb. 15. Make the opportunities that you cannot find, Works „ 25. Go on. You shall want no assistance, „ April 7. I leave these my last words with you, „ I would not employ an Apostle if he could not preach in the morning, . . . . . Everett Coll. r Arminian \ Arminian May 6. If he sells bread on the Lord's Day, J (B.C.) Maga-1 i's I zine, 1827 J June 16. The English Methodists do not roll in money like many of the American Methodists, Works ,, 26. I am become, I know not how, an honourable man, . . . . „ A July 8. I desire you to come to the ConT ference, Everett Coll. Aug. 19. I firmly believe I am a scriptural bishop as much as any man in England, Works A" Sept. 5. Disappoint those who wait for your halting, Everett Coll. N „ 16. Those doggerel verses, . . . „ xxxiv 483 263 265 226 171 266 132 214 227 268 380 197 90 198 198 LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE 1*785 T I T L E IN T H E T E X T SOURCE OF LETTER PAGE I N THIS VOL. N Oct. 8. I hope to be preaching . . . everywhere a t half-past six in t h e evening, Everett Coll. 199 Nov. 8. Set him a pattern in all things, . Life 200 „ 17. Preach in t h e morning . . . none sing oftener than twice, . . Everett Coll. 201 Bee. 14. If they do not come t o their senses . . . ! . . . . E v e r e t t Coll. 201 Sing twice; once before and oncej Hist. Soc. after sermon, . . , . 1 ProceedI ingsy 1. 202 1786 r Drew > Jan. 14. H e that made the heart can heal t h e l Seminary, I heart, . . . . . . 1 Madison, f 166 iNew Jersey J Feb. 3. You should n o t forget French or anything you have learned, . . Works 175 „ 24. I go calmly and quietly on my f U.M.F.C. \ 216 way, {Mag., 1862 J Mar. 12. Your proposal t o send missionaries, . Life 181 Sept. 30. The poor are the Christians, . . Works 269 iV^Oct. 29. She was surly. . . . You have an estate left you, . . . . Everett Coll. 203 Nov. 26. The work of God continually increasing . . . you will now see in America, Life 270 „ 30. You do well to join them together immediately, . . . . Works 271 , Dec. —. Lift up your heart to God, or you will be angry with me, . . . ,, 204 1787 Feb. 20. I hear very different accounts of your provinces, . . . . Life J u n e 16. I would fain give you one more instance of my sincere regard, . Colman Coll. (In facsimile also; see page 464.) 273 459 xxxv LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE T I T L E IN T H E T E X T SOURCE OF PAGE IN VOL. LETTER THIS 1787 July 8. A manifestation few are favoured with, . . Works „ 16. You do not send me your Journal yet, Life Sept. 26. Guard your flock, . . . . Works Oct. 20. I, riot you, will judge, Dec. 11. Distilled liquors . . . I would f U.M.F.G. 1 banish them out of the world, . \Mag., 1862 J Dec. —. I will engage to eat it! . . Works 415 274 275 172 217 165 1788 iVFeb. 29. That young man who neglects th ef Victoria Coll., \^ 1-230 Lord's Supper, . . . A Toronto J N Mar. 8. In travelling up and down you will 364 See text want a little money, 276 Life „ 19. The case of those poor demoniacs, . 181 May 16. Thus far only I could go, „ 28. Many of the genteeler sort. You have a particular mission to 376 these, Works June 3. These calculations are far above, out J , : , \ 153 of my sight, '[Man Chester J' ' „ 80. The work . . . seems to lie nearer my heart, . . . . . Works 277 July SO. By whom shall the preachers be judged ? . . . . . 131 Life Aug. 3. The itinerant plan. . . . Oh do not Works 417 hide that you are a Methodist, Sept. 20. You are the elder brother of the American Methodists : I am, under God, the father of the whole 279 family, . . . . . 418 „ 80. Throw that money into the sea, f Rylands \ 228 N Oct. 31. You are called to marry, I Library J Nov. 16. You should not wear the surplice . Everett Coll, 214 any more, . . . . xxxvi LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE 1*7QQ N N N N T I T L E IN T H E T E X T SOURCE OF LETTER J a n . 24. I wish to be in every point, great and smalls a scriptural, natural Christian, Feb. 13. A business of some importance, . „ 28. H e did no more than it was his duty to do, Mar. 9. W a r y in choosing names for our children, April 2. Let the matter drop, . . . May 28. Not one harsh or passionate word, . J u n e 25. Oh what will t h e end be ? W h y , glory to God in the highest, . „ 26. You were able and willing, and did, in fact, teach, . . . . J u l y 15. There is a three-fold leading of t h e Spirit, Nov. 21. Take an equal share in t h e common labour, 1790 Feb. N May June „ PAGE IN T H I S VOL. Works E v e r e t t Coll. J Rylands 1 1 Library J Works Everett Coll. „ N 175 205 206 176 See text 282 Works 283 Life 284 Time has shaken me by t h e hand, . Works Speak as plain and dull as one of us, Everett Coll. 1 think he must do this, or die, . Life Whoever gets money, do you win souls, . . . . . . ,, ,, 26. Your Lordship leaves t h e Methodists only this alternative : Leave the Church or s t a r v e , . . . . Works „ 28. The people of Bristol are honest, yet so dull, „ A t^ r . . ^- i r Public Lib-^ a Aug. 13. I can trust you, even in so critical J . . t> I > 233 Works 3. 5. 1. 14. Case 280 215 285 207 177 285 133 178 004 Iton, U.S.A./ „ 22. A little difficulty on setting out is a good omen, Autumn. If this is not oppression, what is? . . . Speak a word to Mr. Pitt, . See text Works 228 487 xxxvii LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS DATE T I T L E IN T H E T E X T 1790 Sept. 9. I followed one rule: You must either hend or break, . . . „ 15. This doctrine is the grand depositum which God has lodged with the people called Methodists, . . Nov. 4. The day after you receive this, go. . . . Sick or well, g o ! . . . SOURCE OF LETTER Works 179 ,, 173 „ 369 „ 135 „ 286 . I fopo ' ) oi* 1790/1 [Nodate.] Think and let think, Feb. 1. Declaring to all men that the Methodists are one people in all the world, „ 13. Kill your enemies? They'll die off themselves if you let them alone,. 1 „ 24. Opposing that execrable villainy, which is the scandal of religion, of England, and of human nature, . PAGE IN THIS VOL. ' Life 489 II SOURCES OF LETTERS CITED ABOVE, AND SOME AUTHORITIES USED Colman Coll.—Collection of Wesley Papers in the possession of Russell J. Colman, Esq., D.L., J.P., Norwich. Everett Coll.—Collection of Autograph Wesley and other Letters (made by the Rev. James Everett), now in the United Methodist College, Victoria Park, Manchester. Moravian Coll.—Wesley and other Letters in the archives of the Moravian Publication Office, Fetter Lane, London. Works.—Works of the Rev. John Wesley, A.M. Third edition. Edited by Thomas Jackson. 14 volumes, 1829-31, xxxviii LIST OF WESLEY'S LETTERS Life.—Life and Times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A. Tyerman. Sixth edition. 3 volumes, 1890. By the Rev. L. C. Wesley's Life.—Life of the Rev. Charles Wesley, M.A. Jackson. 2 volumes, 1841. By Thomas The Works of John and Charles Wesley: A Bibliography. By the Rev. Richard Green. Second edition, 1906. Journal of the Rev. John Wesley, A.M. Edited by Nehemiah Curnock, assisted by Experts. 8 volumes, 1909Proceedings of the Wesley Historical Society. Privately published. Volumes I.-IX. A New History of Methodism. Edited by W. J. Townsend, D.D., H. B. Workman, M.A., D.Lit., and George Eayrs, F.R.Hist.S. With a Bibliography. 2 volumes, 1909. xxxix INTRODUCTORY NOTE WESLEY^S Letters rank with his famous Journal and Diaries as chronicles of his work and revelations of his character. As the human founder of the Methodists, the largest Protestant community in the world, he had extraordinary influence in the British Isles and America, even in his lifetime. He was a general in religious matters, and his army of preachers and followers was largely controlled by his short, sharp letters, which ring like an officer's orders. He was also to many thousands a director and shepherd of spirit, soul, and body, Counsels on the most momentous and the most trivial affairs of life are given. And while he gives counsel, he asks it also. Here are long and intimate Letters to his most valued lay friend, to whom he confided his troubles concerning his utterly unsuitable wife; to lady friends; to the king and his ministers, and some of the bestknown people of his time; and to those who, but for his Letters, would never have been heard of half a mile from home. How versatile he was ! He intermeddled with all knowledge. Besides unnumbered Letters about Methodism, his Letters deal with the Church, the State and its Taxes, Trade and Economics, Social Questions, Slavery, Education, Health, Sleep, Medicine, Literary Style, and Publishing. These and other of his many interests come before us in the representative Letters here given. Some account is given in Book i. of Wesley the Man, A 1 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS his time and its conditions, his work and character; his life is also given in outline. As he reads these representative Letters, grouped according to their main purpose, or received by this or that correspondent, the reader will link the Letters with the years and events of Wesley's life, and recall as he reads, some impression of the form and manner of their writer. The reproduction herein of some of his Letters in facsimile, and of an authentic likeness of him, will further help to place us by the side of him who wrote and of those who first read these Letters. 2 BOOK I JOHN WESLEY AND HIS LETTERS Wesley has at last come into the kingdom of his fame. The most splendid compliments paid to him to-day come, not from those inside the Church he founded, but from those outside it. Leslie Stephen describes Wesley as the greatest captain of men of his century. Macaulay ridicules those writers of * books called histories of England' who failed to see that amongst the events which have determined that history is the rise of Methodism. Wesley, he says, had ' a genius for government not inferior to that of Richelieu'; Matthew Arnold gives nobler praise when he says he had ' a genius for godliness.' Southey, who wrote Wesley's life without in the least understanding Wesley's secret, asserts him to be * the most influential mind of the last century ; the man who will have produced the greatest effects, centuries or perhaps millenniums hence, if the present race of men shall so long continue.' Buckle calls him ' the first of ecclesiastical statesmen.' Lecky says that the humble meeting in Aldersgate Street when Wesley was converted ' forms an epoch in English history'; and he adds that the religious revolution begun in England by the preaching of the Wesleys is ' of greater historic importance than all the splendid victories by land and sea won under Pitt.' Wesley, he holds, was one of the chief forces that saved England from a revolution such as France knew. England, in a word, is as truly interested in Wesley as in Shakespeare. W. H. FITCHETT, CHAPTER I THE MAN, JOHN WESLEY ' The Little Trim Gentleman.' according to the flesh was, like all the Wesleys, short in stature and slight in build. At manhood his height was only five feet five inches; his weight was one hundred and twenty-two pounds, and so remained for many years. His appearance was singularly impressive. The peculiar composure of his countenance showed him to be no common man. In youth his black (dark brown) hair, quite smooth, and parted very exactly at the front, was long, and reached almost to his shoulders. It became silvery white in his old age. After an illness, when seventy-two, he wore a wig, as represented in his later portraits. He wore the professional three-cornered hat of the period. When preaching, whether in a building or in the open air, he always wore the black gown and bands of a clergyman. A full pen portrait of Wesley was given by one of his preachers, John Hampson, Jun. He knew him intimately, and published his skilful delineation in the year of Wesley's death, while quick memories could attest or correct it. Phrases are often quoted from it. In its entirety it is the most complete and vivid contemporary description of Wesley in existence.1 JOHN WESLEY A Pen Portrait. ' The figure of Mr. Wesley was remarkable. His stature was of the lowest: his habit of body in every period of life 1 In part it may be compared with the skilful study of Wesley's features, by the late Rev. Richard Green, as given in the fine Williams portrait of him. See A New History of Methodism, vol. L, frontispiece, and p. 204. 5 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS the reverse of corpulent, and expressive of strict temperance and continual exercise: and, notwithstanding his small size, his step was firm and his appearance, till within a few years of his death, vigorous and muscular. His face, for an old man, was one of the finest we have seen. A clear, smooth forehead, an aquiline nose, an eye the brightest and most piercing that can be conceived, and a freshness of complexion scarcely ever to be found at his years, and expressive of the most perfect health, conspired to render him a venerable and interesting figure. Few have seen him without being struck with his appearance; and many who had been greatly prejudiced against him have been known to change their opinion the moment they were introduced into his presence. In his countenance and demeanour there was a cheerfulness mingled with gravity ; a sprightliness which was the natural result of an unusual flow of spirits, and was yet accompanied by every mark of the most serene tranquillity. His aspect, particularly in profile, had a strong character of acuteness and penetration. In dress he was a pattern of neatness and simplicity. A narrow plaited stock, a coat with a small upright collar, no buckles at his knees, no silk or velvet in any part of his apparel, and a head as white as snow, gave an idea of something primitive and apostolical, while an air of neatness and cleanliness was diffused over his whole person. His rank as a preacher is pretty generally understood. His attitude in the pulpit was graceful and easy, his action calm and natural, yet pleasing and expressive: his voice not loud, but clear and manly ; his style neat, simple, perspicuous, and admirably adapted to the capacity of his hearers.' From Wesley's Itinerary 1 it may be gathered that he travelled two hundred and fifty thousand miles in his ministrations, during which he preached forty thousand times. In early life he was a great walker. His later and longer journeys were performed on horseback. Often he used the stage-coach, ' the machine' as he calls it, the ' diligence,' or post-chaise. When he was sixty-three years of age, a carriage and pair was presented to him. He must be pictured for 1 6 Wesley Historical Society publication. THE MAN WESLEY many thousands of hours riding on highways and byways, the reins lying loose on his horse's neck, while his hands hold up a book to his eyes, as he was near-sighted. A t his next halting-place his ever-ready pen will exercise itself on that book in commendation, sharp criticism, or condensation for his followers; other literary matter or these letters will be written, or the thousand and one tasks of a shepherd of souls and bodies will engage him. But ' who besides Wesley ever turned the saddle and the open road and the changing English skies into a permanent study ' ? The door of one side of his coach was nailed up, and on the inside were shelves filled with books. Attached to the front of the coach was a board which was let down and used as a desk. His Service and its Secret. Incessantly travelling, preaching, organising, he yet found time to write two hundred and thirty original works, great and-small. One hundred works were extracted and edited, and thousands of letters were written, from which these are selected. In his young manhood hindered by alternate liveliness or moroseness, idleness, and even untruthfulness, recorded in cipher in his diary with many a sigh and cry for mercy,1 he was renewed by the Holy Spirit in the inward man, and by self-knowledge, self-reverence, self-control was brought to sovran power and tireless industry. 'Leisure and I have taken leave of one another,'' he declared; and, 'though I am always in haste, I am never in a hurry.' He claimed England afresh for God, and looked upon all the world as his parish. 2 ' A Little, Frail, Dyspeptic, Consumptive Body.' It is a bad mistake to suppose that Wesley worked easily, or had the advantage of an iron constitution. The opposite is the fact. He began life ill-equipped, as is said above in Mr. Curnock's words. His record must be viewed in the light of his care, development, and conquest of a weak body. 1 See his Journal, Standard edition, vol. i. p. 54. For his life and work and their immediate, subsequent, and world-wide results see A New History of Methodism. 8 7 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS The fifteenth child of his parents, he was so delicate that his father baptized him on the day of his birth, and commanded him to run a mile every day for health's sake when at school. His nose and lungs bled frequently while he was at Oxford. His Journal tells that he had smallpox when a child, a fever at thirty-eight, and twice later. At fifty-one he was so near death by consumption that he wrote his own epitaph—' To avoid vile panegyric.' He suffered often from cramp and what he calls ( aflux.' When over seventy he underwent a surgical operation, and in June 1775 he was for days ' more dead than alive.' Although very active and abstemious, he suffered from gout, of which his father was frequently ill and his mother died, and was attacked by it nine or ten times in thirty years. That he lived to be eighty-eight and made such an extraordinary record of service are proofs of divine assistance united with rare common sense, restraint, patience, and determination. He won his laurels by means which all may use. Praying always, with all Prayer. The secret of these victories by Wesley in the inner and the outer world alike is disclosed in his diaries * and these Letters. It was prayer and communion with God. Among his early resolves were these: ' To dedicate an hour, morning and evening; No Excuse, Reason or Pretence'; ' T o pray every hour, seriously, deliberately, fervently.' We can trace his frequent, almost literal, fulfilment of these vows. Alike in years far apart as 1768 and 1782, day after day, the first item in the almost hourly record is ' Prayed.' It recurs four, six, or more times, and it closes the busy day's account. The other frequent item is ' Singing.' On some days he sang eight times. These Letters show him at prayer for others also, and he urges them to use the same weapon—All-prayer. Of Wesley's life, times, and work, and his character, Mr. Birrell writes in his brilliant, inimitable style in the next chapter. 1 8 Journal, vol. i. p. 125 ; vol. vi. pp. 370, 379, 493. CHAPTER II JOHN WESLEY, HIS TIMES AND WORK B Y THE RIGHT HONOURABLE AUGUSTINE BIRRELL, K.C., M.P. The Strenuous Worker of the Eighteenth Century. born as he was in 1703, and dying as he did in 1791, covered as nearly as mortal man may the whole of the eighteenth century, of which he was one of the most typical figures, and certainly the most strenuous. He began his published Journal on October 14, 1735, and its last entry is under date Sunday, October 24, 1790, when in the morning he explained to a numerous congregation in Spitalfields Church ' T h e Whole Armour of God,' and in the afternoon enforced to a still larger audience in St. Paul's, Shadwell, the great truth, ' One Thing is Needful/ the last words of the Journal being: ' I hope many even then resolved to choose the better part.' Between these two Octobers there lies the most amazing record of human exertion ever penned or endured. Here is a summary of a week's work in 1777.1 His age is seventy-four. On Friday, May 9, he rides from Osmotherly, fifteen miles, to Malton, Yorkshire, suffering at intervals from ague. He preaches. Having heard that E. Ritchie is ill, he sets out after the service and reaches Otley, forty-eight miles away, at four o'clock Saturday morning. After seeing the invalid he rides back to Malton, having as he says ridden between ninety and a hundred miles. He rests an hour and then rides twenty-two miles to Scarborough, and preaches in the evening. On Sunday morning JOHN WESLEY, 1 Rev. T. E. Brigden in A New History of Methodism, vol. i. p. 217. 9 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS he is shaking with fever. He lies between blankets, drinks hot lemonade, perspires, and sleeps for half an hour. Then he rises up and preaches. After this he meets the Society. On Monday he is preaching at Bridlington. On Tuesday he preaches at Beverley in the morning and at Hull at night, having ridden thirty-six miles that day. On Wednesday he rides twenty-six miles to Pocklington, preaches, rides twelve miles farther to York, and preaches again. He admits that he feels his 'breast out of order,'' and would gladly rest. But he is expected at Tadcaster. He starts at 9 a.m. on Thursday in a chaise, which breaks down. He borrows a lively horse whose movements, he says, electrify him and feels better. He preaches, and that same night he returns twelve miles to York. The next day he ' took the diligence' for London. Such had been Wesley's weekly tale of work for thirty-eight years, as his Journal shows. And it minimises the facts. This is seen when it is compared with his private diaries and sermon register. His day began at four or six o'clock in the morning, often earlier than the former, and lasted until ten or half-past eleven. Every hour and half-hour is accounted for, used, and filled. He gave an exposition of Scripture to every company, small or large, that he met. The register shows that he frequently gave six, nine, or twelve such expositions in a day. On Sunday, November 5, 1752, he seems to have used the almost incredible number of nineteen different Scripture portions in this way.1 A Fifty Years' Campaign. I do not know whether I am likely to have among my readers any one who has ever contested an English or Scottish county in a Parliamentary election since household suffrage. If I have, that tired soul will know how severe is the strain of its three weeks, and how impossible it seems at the end of the first week that you should be able to keep it going for another fortnight, and how when the last night arrived you felt that had the strife been accidentally prolonged another 1 10 Journal, vol. ii. ; vol. iv. pp. 2, 47. WESLEY'S TIMES AND WORK seven days you must have perished by the wayside. Well, John Wesley contested the three kingdoms in the cause of Christ during a campaign which lasted fifty years. He did it for the most part on horseback. He paid more turnpikes than any man who ever bestrode a beast. Eight thousand miles was his annual record for many a long year, during each of which he seldom preached less frequently than a thousand times. Had he but preserved his scores at all the inns where he lodged they would have made by themselves a history of prices. And throughout it all he never knew what depression of spirits meant, though he had much to try him—suits in Chancery and a jealous wife. The Itinerant Evangelist. In the course of this unparalleled contest Wesley visited again and again the most out-of-the-way districts, the remotest corners of England—places which to-day lie far removed even from the searcher after the picturesque. Even now, when the map of England looks like a gridiron of railways, none but the sturdiest of pedestrians, the most determined of cyclists, can retrace the steps of Wesley and his horse and stand by the rocks and the natural amphitheatres in Cornwall and in Northumberland, in Lancashire and Berkshire, where he preached his Gospel to the heathen. Exertion so prolonged, enthusiasm so sustained, argues a remarkable man, while the organisation he created, the system he founded, the view of life he promulgated, is still a great fact among us. No other name than Wesley's lies embalmed as his does. Yet he is not a popular figure. Our standard historians—save, indeed, Mr. John Richard Green, Mr. Lecky, and lately Mr. Temperley in the Cambridge Modern History, have dismissed him curtly. The fact is, Wesley puts your ordinary historian out of conceit with himself. How much easier to weave into your page the gossip of Horace Walpole, to enliven it with a heartless jest of George Selwin's, to make it blush with sad stories of the extravagance of Fox, to embroider it with the rhetoric of Burke, to humanise it with the talk of Johnson, to discuss 11 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS the rise and fall of administrations, the growth and decay of constitutions, than to follow John Wesley into the streets of Bristol or on to the bleak moors near Burslem, where he met face to face in all their violence, all their ignorance, and all their generosity, the living men, women, and children who made up the nation ! It has, perhaps, also to be admitted that to found great organisations is to build your tomb. A splendid thing it may be, a veritable sarcophagus, but none the less a tomb. John Wesley's chapels lie a little heavily on John Wesley. Even so do the glories of Rome make us forgetful of the grave in Syria. I t has been said that Wesley's character lacks charm, that mighty antiseptic. It is not easy to define charm, which is not a catalogue of qualities, but a mixture. Let no one deny charm to Wesley who has not read his Journal. Southey's Life is a dull, almost a stupid book, which happily there is no need to read. Read the Journal, which is a book full- of plots and plays and novels, which quivers with life, and is crammed full of character. His Ancestry and Parentage. John Wesley came of a stock which had been much harassed and put about by unhappy religious difficulties. Politics, business, and religion are the three things Englishmen are said to worry themselves about. The Wesleys early took up with religion. John Wesley's great-grandfather and grandfather were both ejected from their livings in 1662, and the grandfather was so bullied and oppressed by the Five Mile Act that he early gave up the ghost, whereupon his remains were refused what is called Christian Burial, though a holier and more primitive man never drew breath. 1 This poor, persecuted spirit left two sons according to the flesh, Matthew and Samuel; and Samuel it was who in his turn became the father of John and Charles Wesley. Samuel Wesley, though minded to share the lot, hard 1 See * Links between the Ejected Clergy of 1662, the Wesleys, and Methodism,' by Mr. Eayrs, in The Ejectment 0/1662 and the Free Churches. 12 WESLEY'S TIMES AND WORK though that lot was, of his progenitors, had the moderation of mind, the Christian conservatism, perhaps even the disposition to Toryism, which marked the family, and being sent to a Dissenting College, became disgusted with the ferocity and bigotry he happened there to encounter. Those were the days of the Calves' Head Club and feastings on January 29, graceless meals for which Samuel Wesley had no stomach. His turn was for the things that are ' quiet, wise, and good.' He departed from the Dissenting Seminary, and in 1685 entered himself as a poor scholar at Exeter College, Oxford. He brought £2, 6s. with him, and as for prospects he had none. Exeter received him. During the eighteenth century our two Universities, famous despite their faults, were always open to the poor scholar who was ready to subscribe, not to boat clubs or cricket clubs, but to the Thirty-Nine Articles. Three Archbishops of Canterbury during the eighteenth century were the sons of small tradesmen. There was, in fact, much less snobbery and money-worship during the century when the British Empire was being won than during the century when it is being talked about. Samuel Wesley was allowed to remain at Oxford, where he supported himself by devices known to his tribe, and when he left the University to be ordained, he had clear in his pouch, after discharging his few debts, £1Q', 15s. He had thus made £83 9s. out of his University, and had his education as it were thrown in for nothing. He soon obtained a curacy in London, and married a daughter of the well-known ejected clergyman Dr. Annesley, about whom you may read in another eighteenth-century book, The Life and Errors of John Dunton. His Epworth Home. The mother of the Wesleys was a remarkable woman, though cast in a mould not much to our minds nowadays. She had nineteen children, and greatly prided herself on having taught them, one after another, by frequent chastisements, to — what do you think ? — cry softly. She had IS JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS theories of education and strength of will, and of arm too, to carry them out. She knew Latin and Greek, and though, as some would say, a stern, forbidding, almost an unfeeling parent, she was successful in winning and retaining, not only the respect, but the affection of such of her huge family as lived to grow up* But out of the nineteen, thirteen early succumbed. Infant mortality was one of the great facts of the eighteenth century, whose Rachels had to learn to cry softly over their dead babes. The mother of the Wesleys thought more of her children's souls than of their bodies. The revolution of 1688 threatened to disturb the early married life of Samuel Wesley and his spouse. The husband wrote a pamphlet in which he defended revolution principles, but the wife secretly adhered to the old cause; nor was it until a year before Dutch William's death that the Rector made the discovery that the wife of his bosom, who had sworn to obey him and regard him as her overlord, was not in the habit of saying ' A m e n ' to his fervent prayers on behalf of his suffering sovereign. An explanation was demanded and the truth extracted, namely, that in the opinion of the Rector's wife her true king lived over the water. The Rector at once refused to live with Mrs. Wesley any longer until she recanted. This she refused to do, and for a twelvemonth the couple dwelt apart, when William in. having the good sense to die, a reconciliation became possible. If John Wesley was occasionally a little pigheaded, need one wonder ? The story of the fire at Epworth Rectory and the miraculous escape of the infant John was once a tale as well known as Alfred in the neatherd's hut, and pictures of it still hang up in many a collier's home. Scholar, Gentleman, Clergyman. John Wesley received a sound classical education at Charterhouse and Christ Church, and remained all his life very much the scholar and the gentleman. The name Wesley is a shortened form of Wellesley. Arthur Wellesley, the great Duke of Wellington, belonged to a collateral 14 WESLEY'S TIMES AND WORK branch of the same family.1 No company was too good for John Wesley, and nobody knew better than he did that had he cared to carry his powerful intelligence, his flawless constitution, and his infinite capacity for taking pains into any of the markets of the world, he must have earned for himself place, fame, and fortune. Coming, however, as he did of a theological stock, having a saint for a father and a notable devout woman for a mother, Wesley from his early days learned to regard religion as the business of his life, just as the younger Pitt came to regard the House of Commons as the future theatre of his actions. After a good deal of heart-searching and theological talk with his mother, Wesley was ordained a deacon by the excellent Potter, afterward Primate, but then (1725) Bishop of Oxford. In the following year Wesley was elected a Fellow of Lincoln, to the great delight of his father. ' Whatever I am,' said the good old man, 6 my Jack is Fellow of Lincoln.' 2 The Course of Church History: Elizabeth. In trying to form even a glimmering idea of the state of the Church of England in 1725, when Wesley took orders, there are some incidents in its past history which must not be overlooked. I mean its repeated purgings. Evictions are, of course, of frequent occurrence in all Church histories, but the Church of England has been peculiarly unlucky in this respect. Let me, in a handful of sentences, recall the facts. I pass over the puzzling and unedifying events of King Henry vm/s time, the Protestant rule of his shortlived son, the frank Romanism of his eldest daughter, and begin with Elizabeth, who succeeded in November 1558. Crowned though she was according to the Catholic ceremonial, including the unction and the Pontifical Mass, it appears to have been well understood by those in high places that England having got a new master, must be prepared once 1 Wesley's pedigree is in the Bodleian Library, Oxford (MS. Eng. Lang, d. 20). 2 See his letter on page 48. 15 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS more for new men and new measures. They were indeed strange times. Can it be that the country did not care about the continuity of its Church ? The Act of Supremacy soon made its appearance, annexing to the Crown all jurisdictions, spiritual and ecclesiastical, for the visitation and reformation of the ecclesiastical state and persons, and of all errors, heresies, and schisms. The inevitable oath was directed to be taken under the usual penalties—first, loss of property, then loss of life. When Queen Mary died there were but fifteen Anglican bishops. Of these, fourteen refused the oath, and were turned neck-and-crop out of their sees. They went away quickly enough, and disappeared into obscurity. Elizabeth called them a set of lazy scamps. We have no evidence that they were anything of the kind. Hardships and indignities were heaped upon them. Some died in prison, others in retirement; one or two escaped abroad. It seems to be the fact that they all died in their beds. They had no mind either to burn or hang. Jeremy Collier gives us, in addition to those fourteen prelates, a list of three bishops-elect, one abbess, four priors, twelve deans, fourteen archdeacons, sixty canons, one hundred priests, all well preferred, fifteen heads of colleges, and about twenty doctors of both faculties—all what one may call stationary people hard to move, who were at this same time deprived of their places, profits, and dignities. I t does not seem a great many out of the nine thousand spiritual places in England. Still, to lose its whole hierarchy (except the Bishop of Llandaff) at one blow was a shrewd knock, nor, we may be sure, did the bishops-elect, the deans, the archdeacons and canons, the heads of houses and doctors of divinity, and the one hundred well-preferred priests go out without rendings of the heart and bitter reflections. There were no newspapers to record their emotions or to summarise their losses under the heading ' Crisis in the Church'; but we may be sure they were pious men, sick of shuffles and crowned heads, while of those who remained, who can tell with what uneasiness of mind, with what pangs of conscience, they did so ? 16 WESLEY'S TIMES AND WORK Under the Commonwealth. This is Purge No. 1, and it got rid of the old Roman pietist; and let no man deny to the Church of Rome one of the notes of a true Church—the capacity to breed saints. Purge No. £ was numerically more important. Charles i. got into those difficulties which brought his comely head to the scaffold, and the beneficed clergy were made subject to visitation by order of the House of Commons and in large numbers turned adrift. That many of these clergy were illiterate and unfit for their office is true enough; but in the teeth of the protests made by the best men among the Puritan party, other tests than those of learning and piety were imposed and enforced. Loyalty to the dead king, or malignancy as it was termed, was counted to be a disqualification for a country parson; a sour observance of Sunday was reckoned as piety, and many a good man who had earned and deserved the love of his parishioners was evicted to make way for a Presbyterian. How many parsons were turned out during the Commonwealth it is hard to say; but many hundred there certainly were, and among them were numbered some of the very choicest spirits of the age. The Ejectment of 1662. Purge No. 3 is the one best known in Nonconformist circles. I t occurred after the restoration of the Stuarts, when two thousand of the clergy, including a large number of the intruders of the Commonwealth, were turned out of their livings for refusing to take the oath required by the Act of Uniformity. The celebrated Richard Baxter (who refused a bishopric) tells us in his Life,1 which is one of the best books in existence, how these evicted tenants were made up. The passage is too long to be here quoted, and it is enough to say that by this purge the Church of England 1 Reliquia Baxteriana. The Bishop of Chester issued an Excerpt from it in 1910—the remarkable passage giving Baxter's Self-Review. The most recent Life (1912) is Richard Baxter and the Revival of Preaching and Pastoral Service, by Mr. Eayrs. B 17 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS lost a host of her clergy who had no objection to bishops or to a Liturgy, who had never signed the Solemn League and Covenant, who had been against the Civil War, but who were unwilling, because unable, to give their unfeigned assent and consent to all and everything contained in the Book of Common Prayer. But they had to go. They were devout, they were learned, they were peaceful, they were sensible. It mattered n o t ; out they went like Wesley's own grandfather, and were hunted from place to place like wolves. The Nonjurors. Purge No. 4 has still to be endured. The Stuarts ran their destined course. The blessed restoration was in less than thirty years succeeded by the glorious revolution, and a fresh oath had, of course, to be invented as a burden upon the conscience of the established clergy. I t was in form simple enough : ' I, A. B., do sincerely promise and swear to bear true allegiance to their Majesties King William and Queen Mary.' But to appreciate its horrid significance we must remember that the now mouldy doctrines of ' Divine right' and ' passive obedience " were then as much the talk * of the clergy of the Church of England as incense, lights, and the sacramental theory are to-day. The books and pamphlets on these subjects may still be counted, though hardly read, in thousands. The Archbishop of Canterbury (Dr. Sancroft) and five of his brethren, including Bishop Ken, were deprived of their sees, and at least four hundred divines followed them into exile. These were the Nonjurors, men of fabulous learning and primitive piety, who added evangelical fervour and simplicity to High Church doctrine. To read the lives of these men is to live among the saints and doctors, and their expulsion from the Church they alone loved and they alone could properly defend, diverted into alien channels the very qualities we find so sorely lacking in the Anglican Church of the eighteenth century. How absurd to grumble at the Hoadleys and the Watsons, the Hurds and the Warburtons ! They were all that was left. 18 WESLEY'S TIMES AND WORK Faith and fervour, primitive piety, Puritan zeal, Catholic devotion—each in its turn had been decimated and cast out. What a history it is ! Whether you read it in the Roman page of Lingard and Dodd and Morris, or in the Anglican record of Collier, or turn over the biographies to be found in our old friends Walker and Calamy, what can you do but hold up your hands in horror and amazement ? Wherever and whenever there was goodness, piety, faith, devotion, out it had to go. I t was indeed as into a dungeon, stripped, swept, and bare, that the Church of England stepped at the revolution, and in that dungeon she lay for a hundred years. Since then many things have happened. There has been a revival of faith and fervour in the Church of England, so much so that Purge No. 5 may shortly be expected. The reason why I have dwelt at great length on these facts of Church history is because we should have them in mind if we are to understand what may be called the status quo ante helium John Wesley waged with the devil in Great Britain. Wesley's Work. Wesley's motive never eludes us. In his early manhood, after being greatly affected by Jeremy Taylor's Holy Living and Dying and the Imitatio Christi, and by Law's Serious Call and Christian Perfection, he met a ' serious man' who said to him : ' Sir, you wish to serve God and go to heaven. Remember, you cannot serve Him alone. You must therefore find companions or make them. The Bible knows nothing of solitary religion.' He was very confident, this serious man, and Wesley never forgot his message: ' You must find companions or make them. The Bible knows nothing of solitary religion.' These words for ever sounded in Wesley's ears, determining his theology, which rejected the stern individualism of Calvin, and fashioning his whole polity, his famous class meetings, and generally gregarious methods. £ Therefore to him it was given Many to save with himself.' 19 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS We may continue the quotation and apply to Wesley the words of Mr. Arnold's memorial to his father: e Languor was not in his heart, Weakness not in his word, Weariness not on his brow.' If you ask what is the impression left upon the reader of the Journal as to the condition of England question, the answer will vary very much with the tenderness of the reader's conscience and with the extent of his acquaintance with the general behaviour of mankind at all times and in all places. Wesley himself is no alarmist, no sentimentalist; he never gushes, seldom exaggerates, and always writes on an easy level. Naturally enough he clings to the supernatural, and is always disposed to believe in the bona Jides of ghosts and the diabolical origin of strange noises ; but outside this realm of speculation Wesley describes things as he saw them. In the first published words of his friend Dr. Johnson, ' he meets with no basilisks that destroy with their eyes, his crocodiles devour their prey without tears, and his cataracts fall from the rocks without deafening the neighbouring inhabitants.' His Humour and Persistence. Wesley's humour is of the species donnish, and his modes and methods quietly persistent. He writes in his Journal: On Thursday, the 20th May (1742), I set out. The next afternoon I stopped a little at Newport-Pagnell, and then rode on till I overtook a serious man, with whom I immediately fell into conversation. He presently gave me to know what his opinions were, therefore I said nothing to contradict them. But that did not content him. He was quite uneasy to know ' whether I held the doctrines of the decrees as he d i d ' ; but I told him over and over : ' W e had better keep to practical things, lest we should be angry at one another. 1 And so we did for two miles, till he caught me unawares, and dragged me into the dispute before I 20 WESLEY'S TIMES AND WORK knew where I was. He then grew warmer and warmer; told me I was rotten at heart, and supposed I was one of John Wesley's followers. I told him ' No. I am John Wesley himself.' Upon which e Improvisum aspris veluti qui sentibus anguem Presset ' he would gladly have run away outright, but being the better mounted of the two I kept close to his side, and endeavoured to show him his heart till we came into the street of Northampton. What a picture have we here of a fine May morning in 1742, the unhappy Calvinist trying to shake off the Arminian Wesley! But he cannot do it. John Wesley is the better mounted of the two^ and so they scamper together into Northampton. The England described in the Journal is an England still full of theology. All kinds of queer folk abound; strange subjects are discussed in odd places. There was drunkenness and cock-fighting, no doubt, but there were also Deists, Mystics, Swedenborgians, Antinomians, Necessitarians, Anabaptists, Quakers, nascent heresies, and slowdying delusions. Villages were divided into rival groups which fiercely argued the nicest points in the aptest language. Nowadays in one's rambles a man is as likely to encounter a grey badger as a black Calvinist. Opposition encountered. The clergy of the Established Church were jealous of Wesley's interference in their parishes, nor was this unnatural ; he was not a Nonconformist but a brother Churchman. What right had he to be so peripatetic ? But Wesley seldom records any instance of gross clerical misconduct. Of one drunken parson he does indeed tell us, and he speaks disapprovingly of another whom he found one very hot day consuming a pot of beer in a lone alehouse. I am bound to confess I have never had any but kindly feelings toward that thirsty ecclesiastic. What, I wonder, was he thinking 21 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS of as Wesley rode by?—Meditations Libres aVun Solitaire Inconnue—unpublished! When Wesley, with that dauntless courage of his—a courage which never forsook him—which he wore on every occasion with the delightful ease of a soldier—pushed his way into fierce districts, amid rough miners dwelling in their own village communities almost outside the law, what most strikes one with admiration, not less in Wesley's Journal than in George Fox's (a kindred though earlier volume), is the essential fitness for freedom of our rudest populations. They were coarse and brutal and savage, but rarely did they fail to recognise the high character and lofty motives of the dignified mortal who had travelled so far to speak to them. Wesley was occasionally hustled, and once or twice pelted with mud and stones; but at no time were his sufferings at the hands of the mob to be compared with the indignities it was long the fashion to heap upon the heads of Parliamentary candidates. The mob knew and appreciated the difference between a Bubb Dodington and a John Wesley. I do not think any ordinary Englishman will be much horrified at the demeanour of the populace. If there was disturbance it was usually quelled. At Norwich two soldiers who disturbed the congregation were seized and carried before the commanding officer, who ordered them to be soundly whipped. In Wesley's opinion they richly deserved all they got. He was no sentimentalist, although an enthusiast. Where the reader of the Journal will be shocked is when his attention is called to the public side of the country—to the state of the gaols, to Newgate, to Bethlehem, to the criminal code, to the brutality of so many of the judges and the harshness of the magistrates, to the supineness of the bishops, to the extinction in high places of the missionary spirit—in short, to the heavy slumber of humanity. Wesley's Evangelistic, Social Service. Wesley was full of compassion—of a compassion wholly free from hysterics and credulity. In public affairs his was the 22 WESLEY'S TIMES AND WORK composed zeal of a Howard. His efforts to penetrate the dark places were long in vain. He says in his dry way: * They won't let me go to Bedlam because they say I make the inmates mad, or into Newgate because I make them wicked.' The reader of the Journal will be at no loss to see what the sapient magistrates meant. Wesley was a terribly exciting preacher, quiet though his manner was. He pushed matters home without flinching. He made people cry out and fall down, nor did it surprise him that they should. You will find some strange biographies in the Journal. Consider that of John Lancaster for a moment. He was a young fellow who fell into bad company, stole some velvet, and was sentenced to death, and lay for a while in Newgate awaiting his hour. A good Methodist woman, Sarah Peters, obtained permission to visit him, though the fever was raging in the prison at the time. Lancaster had no difficulty in collecting six or seven other prisoners, all like himself waiting to be strangled, and Sarah Peters prayed with them and sang hymns, the clergy of the diocese being otherwise occupied. When the eve of their execution arrived, the poor creatures begged that Sarah Peters might be allowed to remain with them to continue her exhortations; but this could not be. In her absence, however, they contrived to console one another, for that devilish device of a later age, solitary confinement, was then unknown. When the bellman came round at midnight to tell them, ' Remember you are to die to-day,' they cried out: 6 Welcome news—welcome news !' How they met their deaths you can read for yourselves in the Journal, which concludes the narrative with a true eighteenth-century touch; ' John Lancaster's body was carried away by a company hired by the surgeons, but a crew of soldiers pursued them, took it from them by force, and delivered it to his mother* by which means it was decently interred in the presence of many who praised God on his behalf.' If you want to get into the last century, to feel its pulses throb beneath your finger, be content sometimes to leave the letters of Horace Walpole unturned, resist the drowsy temptation to waste your time over the learned triflers who 28 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS sleep in the seventeen volumes of Nichols—nay, even deny yourself your annual reading of Boswell or your biennial retreat with Sterne, and ride up and down the country with the greatest force of the eighteenth century in England. A t the Centre. No man lived nearer the centre than John Wesley, neither Clive nor Pitt, neither Mansfield nor Johnson. You cannot cut him out of our national life. No single figure influenced so many minds, no single voice touched so many hearts. No other man did such a life's work for England. As a writer he has not achieved distinction. He was no Athanasius, no Augustine. He was ever a preacher and organiser, a labourer in the service of humanity: but happily for us his journals remain, and from them we can learn better than from anywhere else what manner of man he was, and the character of the times during which he lived and moved and had his being. AUGUSTINE BIRRELL. 24 CHAPTER III JOHN WESLEY'S LIFE IN OUTLINE 1708. June 17 (O.S.). Born at Epworth Rectory, Lincolnshire. Baptized John Benjamin. Wesley never used his second name. 1709. Rescued from the fire which burned down his home. 1711. Admitted to the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper. 1714. Entered Charterhouse School, London. 1720. Elected Scholar of Christ Church College, Oxford. 1724. Graduated B.A. 1725. April. Met ' with a religious friend' (?' Varenese,' Miss Betty Kirkham) and 'set in earnest upon a new life.' September 19. Ordained deacon and priest (1728) by Dr. Potter, Bishop of Oxford. October 16. Preached his first sermon at South Leigh, near Witney, Oxford. 1726. Elected Fellow of Lincoln College, Oxford, and Greek Lecturer and Moderator of the Classes. 1727. Graduated M.A., and became curate at Wroot. 1729. Returned to Oxford University for duties, and joined the Methodists there. 1732. Met the Rev. William Law, whose Serious Call had impressed him. 1733. Preached his first sermon before Oxford University. Issued his first work, A Collection of Forms of Prayer. 1735. October 14. Sailed for Georgia and Savannah,U.S.A., as a missionary. On board met Moravian Christians. 1737. Published his first hymnbook at Charlestown, U.S.A. 25 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS 1738. February 1. Arrived in England. Met Peter Bohler and joined a Religious Society in Fetter Lane, London. May 24. Felt his heart i strangely warmed' in a Religious Society in Aldersgate Street, London: his 4 Evangelical Conversion,** Visited Count Zinzendorf, and the Moravian settlement at Herrnhut, Germany. 1739. April 2 (Monday). Preached for the first time in the open air in England, ' at the farther end of St. Philip's Plain, Bristol: April 4. Formed his first Bristol society. April 8. Preached for the first time at Hanham Mount, Kingswood, Bristol. May 12. Began his first chapel, the New Room, Horsefair and Broadmead, Bristol, now in part the oldest Methodist building in the world. June 14. Lay preaching begun by Cennick. June. Commenced the Colliers"' Schoolhouse, Kingswood, Bristol, now the oldest entire Methodist building. Nov. 11. Opened the Foundery, Tabernacle Street, Finsbury Square, London, as a Methodist chapel. Dec. 27. The United Society of Methodists was founded,' First in London.' 1740. Separated from the Moravians. 1741. Left by Whitefield and his followers. 1742. Arranged Methodist finance and class meetings at Bristol. Began Methodism at Newcastle-on-Tyne. July 23. At his mother's death-bed, in London. 1743. Issued General Rules for his societies, and his Earnest Appeal to Men of Reason and Religion. 1744. Held the first Methodist Conference (London). 1745. Became convinced that Bishops and Presbyters are one order. 1747. First visit to Ireland. 1749-55. Edited the Christian Library in fifty volumes. 1751. Married to Mrs. Vazeille. DATES AND EVENTS 1753-4. Serious illnesses at Lewisham, Bristol, and London. 1755. Issued his Notes on the New Testament. 1768. A Methodist chapel was opened in New York. 1770. Preached Whitefield's funeral sermon. 1774. Underwent a surgical operation. 1775. Illness in Ireland. 1778. Erected City Road Chapel, London. Began the issue of the Armznian Magazine. 1780. Published his Collection of Hymns for the People called Methodists. 1781. Death of his wife. 1784. February £8. Executed his Deed of Declaration settling his chapels and constituting the Wesleyan Methodist Conference. 1784-9. Ordained ministers for America, Scotland, and England. 1786. Made a tour in Holland. 1788. March 29. Charles Wesley died. 1789. Suffered from diabetes. 1791. February 23. Preached his last sermon at Leatherhead, and next day sent his last letter (see p. 488). March 2. Died at City Road Chapel House, London. 27 BOOK II A SELECTION FROM THE LETTERS OF JOHN WESLEY To write a really good letter requires a combination of qualities at once rare in themselves and rarer still in their conjunction. Thus the writer must himself be interesting, and have interesting matter to communicate ; he must be something of an egoist, to whom his own sensations are noticeable, and worthy of notice ; he must possess both daring and freedom, for the last place where caution and reticence are required is in the familiar epistle; he must be absolutely sincere, for the moment he begins to pose his magic wand is broken, and he becomes tedious and offensive ; he must above all possess the intimate note, for without it he will produce an essay, but not a letter. Of all these qualities perhaps the last is the rarest, for a good letter is really a page from the secret memoirs of a man.—DAWSON, Great English Letter- Writers, CHAPTER I JOHN WESLEY AS A LETTER-WRITER A Great English Letter-Writer. WESLEY as a letter-writer has not received his due, nor has the world had its share of delight in him in this regard. He is omitted from a recent collection of great English letter-writers. 1 On the other hand, Dr. Richard Garnett of theBritish Museum, when editing the greatest of anthologies, 2 in twenty volumes, included Wesley's famous Letter to a Friend Concerning Tea 8 as the most characteristic and generally interesting product of his busy and versatile pen. Wesley declared that letter-writing was the talent of his brother Charles rather than his own. He knew the ideal letter as varied in its topics, newsy, descriptive, intimate, and self-revealing. Wesley in his Letters is all these, on occasion; but generally he is eager to teach or comfort, to correct or command. The letters are the man. Is i t ; a mistake when a letter-writer is a man of action, with too much to tell' ? 4 This would rule out two of the most perfect letters in the world—St. Paul's letter to Philemon, and that of President Lincoln to Mrs. Bixby, who had lost five sons in the American Civil War. fc In a man's letters his soul lies naked,' says Dr. Johnson: 'his letters are only the mirror of his heart.' This is true of Wesley's letters. His letters quiver with heart-throbs. Often he is in dead earnest. There are few intenser letters than his to 1 3 3 4 By William J. Dawson and Coningsby W. Dawson. The International Library of Famous Literature. See p. 454. Mr. E. V. Lucas, William Cowper's Letters: a Selection. 31 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS young Furley at Queen's College, Cambridge. 1 More than in his famous published Journal, and sometimes as much as in his diaries, written in cipher, and now deciphered by the genius and pious industry of Mr. Nehemiah Curnock, Wesley reveals himself. Such letters answer the highest test: they are revelations of a human spirit. One almost hesitates to give some of Wesley's letters, say of those to his most intimate lay friend, Ebenezer Black well, the London banker. And the flippant and coarse may sneer at the affectionate terms used to his many lady correspondents. But, as with his cipher diaries, and all the records, every letter may be read, and there will not be found a word or a scintilla which shows him other than a true man, an English gentleman, and a Christian. Although he was these, judged by the highest standards, he knew himself to be fallible and imperfect. In these letters, as elsewhere, he urges the duty of seeking perfection, 6 Christian Perfection,'' as within the purpose and covenant of God for man, and commends some who possess i t ; but he never says that he has attained it. Natural Characteristic Letters. Few of Wesley's letters are without something attractive or distinctive. A golden, memorable phrase, a witty turn, an epigram, a flash of irony, a touch of intimacy, or some self-revelation is there. ' To read John Wesley's letters,' said Alexander Knox, ; is to feel that he wrote as he spoke. Their unstudied simplicity must give this impression ; and I, who often heard him speak, can attest its justness.' Often they thus conform to the dictum of that prince of letter-writers, William Cowper, who declared to Lady Hesketh, ' I like talking letters.' Moreover, they are the letters of the man who under God changed the face of England and founded a world-wide community. The reader of his letters sees all this in progress. Many are dispatches from the battlefield, or the general's orders to captains there. Indeed, sometimes the letters are instruments in the wars. 1 See p. 428. AS LETTERS T h e y are half-battles : his letters indeed are weighty. T h e y seldom fail of their purpose. Wesley offered his pen to t h e Government t o answer the letters of Junius. T h e y missed a powerful ally in not using him. These letters are all written in terse, vigorous English. Wesley soon gets right home t o his subject and his reader. 1 No letter needed to be read twice to learn its meaning. T h e many letters to his preacher, T h o m a s W r i d e , 2 were n o t necessitated by any lack of clearness on Wesley's part, and even t h a t reader must have winced a t last. Wesley often shows himself a master of dialectics. H i s experience a t Oxford as president of the disputations made him a keen analyst of statements and an almost fierce exposer of bad logic. H e is among the ablest users of t h e Socratic method. His letter of many questions t o t h e Methodists concerning poor William S h e n t 3 left them ashamed and penitent. A Change in their Style. There is a marked and significant change in t h e tone and style of Wesley's letters after his evangelical conversion in 1738. Delightful geniality and radiancy take t h e place of formal courtesy and coldness which were often his while 'under t h e law.' 4 A n o t h e r change occurs when his close companionship with the Moravians ceased, to whom he owed, and knew and declared t h a t he owed, an irreparable debt. In his early letters to them, elaborate expressions of his humility and abject spiritual need are frequent. In a less noble nature these might have been mere simulation—the pride which apes humility. H e never completely lost this manner of speech. I t was a sign of t h a t appreciation of spiritual wealth and of t h e aristocracy of t h e holy and t h e initiated which is always displayed by t h e mystic. W h o ever was learned in the things of God, Wesley counted worthy of high honour. Social distinctions and intellectual a t t a i n ments were overlooked if the secret of the Lord was known. 1 2 Compare his letters on style herein, p. 434. See p. 185. See p. 235. 4 E.g. Original Letters by the Rev. John Wesley, Illustrative of his Early History, by Joseph Priestley, LL.D., 1791. 8 c 33 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Hence he writes with freedom, familiarity, and gratitude to those whom he knew but slightly, and who were far removed from him by birth, gifts, culture, attainments, position, and service. To such he styles himself as ' friend and brother.' Were they not of the family of God and of the household of faith ? Often to those not worthy to untie his shoe-latchet he signs himself as ' servant.1 He was a gentleman—a gentle man ; but the deeper reason just given explains the difference between him and some others who have borne without abuse that ancient name. The Duchess of Buckingham, in her bitter letter to the noble Countess of Huntingdon about the Methodists, thought i t ' monstrous to be told that you have a heart as sinful as the common wretches who crawl on the earth.'' Wesley, of purer birth and breeding, gladly associates himself closely with 4 common ' people in these letters, if only they are heirs with him of the same promise of life in Christ. Even so St. John's encyclical letter to the faithful Asiatic Christians declares of them, some unlearned and immature, ' Ye have an unction from the Holy One and know all t h i n g s ' ; and St. Paul said he was not only the bond-slave of Christ, but in slavery to all the Corinthians. He besought Philemon when he might have commanded him. His Affectionate Terms. This spiritual principle largely explains the confidential, even affectionate tone of Wesley's letters to comparative strangers. He trusts, and places high responsibility on, persons of whom he knew little. Sometimes they proved utterly unworthy. ' He says he will keep your secret,' said Charles Wesley of his brother to some friends. ' L e t me whisper to you—he will not. He cannot keep his own.' Often his friends were surprised and amazed by his guilelessness, trustfulness, and freeness; his wife was jealous and angry. His latest, as his earliest, letters show him frank, confiding, and wonderfully patient and hopeful. Probably no letter-writer used the word affectionate so frequently and generally in subscriptions as did he. It was used U AS LETTERS sincerely. He was an affectionate and a friendly man. nature soon glowed, although he hated gush. His Some Mannerisms* Wesley used familiar terms with all his correspondents, except when restrained by their office or dignity. He was then punctilious in his courtesy, as to the bishops or civic dignitaries or Lady Maxwell. He gives pet names in his letters to all members of his old home family and to his friends. Martha was Patty, Mary was Molly. 'Dear Jemmy,' 1 ' Tommy,' and ' Neddy' head many missives. Like Napoleon, he had a remarkable memory for names. He seldom closes a letter without mentioning the relatives or friends of his correspondent, and includes particular messages for them. Has any letter-writer greater variety of terms in closing letters, with stricter uniformity in his purpose, than Wesley ? His aim is to bring his name into the last sentence of his letter. This makes it part of that, instead of leaving it an adjunct and authorisation. This plan rounds off* the letter prettily and makes it much less formal and more friendly; the more so as he usually writes at the end the name of the correspondent, as well as at the beginning. Often a sharp, peremptory note is thus almost softened in its final expression and general impression into a plea. ' At least be serious in the pulpit,' he writes again to strange Thomas Wride. ' Let nothing queer, odd, or ludicrous pass your lips there! Then the work of the Lord will prosper in your hands, and you will be a comfort to, Dear Tommy, Your Affectionate Friend, John Wesley." His Correspondents. Wesley picked his correspondents. Although he wrote so many letters, he says, < it is not common for me to write to any one first; I only answer those that write to m e 1 ; a n d , ' if any man of sense has a desire to defend this bad cause, I am ready to give him an answer; but I have not time to answer every one that has a fancy to nibble at John Wesley.' In 1781 he declared that he had, and had for many 85 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS years previous, a greater number of pious correspondents than any person in England, perhaps in Europe. He had his favourites. No business must hinder his writing to that elect lady, Miss Bolton of Witney (see page 366). Most of his letters were to individuals—like all the best letters. Some, not only those on private affairs, were sealed with wax and bore the Latin legend Tibi soli, solely for thee, or for yourself alone.1 From his hundreds of inns and halting-places he sent his letters fluttering in great numbers into all kinds of eager hands, now in palace, now in cot. A letter from Wesley was even then an event. Incessantly travelling, preaching, writing, and carrying the weight of all his churches and much more, defending great causes, starting national movements, surrounded by crowds, he ever and anon withdraws to the inner sanctities and bends over one life, to comfort, nurture, and woo it to perfection or service. According to an old Methodist custom, many of his letters were read in the band—an inner, strictly limited fellowship of Methodism — or in the class-meeting or society. But, unlike many famous letter-writers, Wesley did not assume an audience for his letters. He reminds us of St. Paul, not of Horace Walpole or Lady Mary Montagu. ' Everywhere we find not the meditated artificiality of the rhetorician, counting the rhythm of his sentences, but the natural indication of hidden greatness.' His Public Letters. Wesley used the literary letter as a form of public appeal, answer, and defence. These letters were epistles, broadsheets, pamphlets, treatises in literary form. One such letter to Bishop Warburton filled a hundred and ten pages, and Wesley was four days in writing it. 2 To another clergyman, Dr. Free, he wrote two long letters, though he declared ' he is too dirty a writer for me to touch.' So was 1 So some in the Moravian Collection. This was his famous reply to Bishop Warburton on the Holy Spirit. Wesley respectfully asks the Bishop to write in a more serious tone. Before printing his own letter, the Bishop sent it to Wesley with a request that he would correct its errors !—Wesley s Works, vol. xii. p. 114. 2 36 AS LETTERS Lavington, Bishop of Exeter; but Wesley wrote him long public letters, and unmasked him too. The signatures to Wesley's letters vary. Sometimes he did not sign them. His handwriting and style always reveal him. To Lady Maxwell he always signed in full, John Wesley; while to his valued lay friend, Ebenezer Blackwell, it is sometimes that, or J. Wesley or J. W. To his preachers it is generally J. Wesley. His handwriting, as shown by the facsimiles herein, was singularly neat, pretty, and steady until, as he put it pathetically, when very aged, Death had shaken him by the hand. He used capital letters very freely, and the familiar contractions of the time —ye for the, yt for that, and ym for them, etc. He wrote his letter with a quill pen,1 on a small quarto sheet of paper which he folded when written, slipped it end into end, and sealed it with wax. Envelopes were yet to come. The Contrasts and Unity of Wesley's Character. As they are perused these letters will show the contrasts in Wesley's constitution and character. As a thinker and teacher, he derived from St. Paul through Augustine and Luther; and his letters often recall those of the Reformer. Sometimes Wesley wrote as charmingly as Luther to his son Hansichen; anon, as terribly as Luther to the Pope. Some contrarieties which Professor Adolf Deissmann 2 notes in St. Paul, ' polar contradictions,'' are here seen in Wesley : his ailing body and physical endurance; his humility and pride—'before God a worm, before men an eagle'; his tenderness and severity. ' And these opposing principles did not shatter' Wesley ; ' they set up in him the high tension which found an outlet in the energy he expended on the great work of his life.'' There was a deep, underlying, real unity in him. His purpose was always the same. Mr. Birrell truly says that Wesley's motive never eludes us.8 As in all his work, he is here intent on ' saving souls.' He 1 His last quill is in a glass case with many curios in the Wesley Museum, Wesley's House, City Road, London. 2 St. Paul; a Study in Social and Religious History—'St. Paul the 8 Man.5 See p. 19. m JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS is catholic in his range and taste : everything interests him. He goes to Bristol fair to see a ' monster,' and to the Tower of London to note the effect of music on the lions there; witnesses a will in which there is a legacy to a cat; reins up his horse to admire and record scenery; is eager to abate taxation and to remedy the scarcity of provisions; and would fain avert the war between England and her American colonies. He has a cultured taste and delights in friendship. But he can never forget his high duty and privilege. He always has an engagement. ' I hate to meet your brother," said Dr. Johnson to Miss Martha Wesley; ' the dog enchants you with his conversation, and then breaks away to go and visit some old woman.'' Nor does Wesley drag in his message. To him it is the most natural thing in the world. When he has sympathised with ' a poor patient' in the agonies of gout 1 —which he knew by much experience—and offered to him the best remedies he knows, he reverently speaks of ' a sickness drugs cannot cure/ for which 6 there is no other medicine under heaven but the peace of God.'* This Selection of his Letters. The chapters which follow contain a representative collection and selection from the thousands of letters which Wesley wrote in his long life. They are grouped under the names of those to whom he wrote them, or the subjects on which he wrote.2 Some of the letters tell their own story. Sufficient explanation is given with others to place the present reader by the side of Wesley and the first reader.3 That Wesley, one of the busiest men of all time, ministered so amply and nobly by Letters is perhaps one of his lessons to our busy age. 1 2 3 38 Work*) vol. xii. p. 282. A list in chronological order is given on p. xix. And see Book I., pp. 5-12. CHAPTER II TO HIS FATHER AND MOTHER—THE REV. SAMUEL WESLEY, M.A., AND MRS. SUSANNA WESLEY His Mother, Susanna Wesley. T H E first of Wesley's letters here given shall be one to his mother, Susanna Wesley (1669-1742). ' The mother makes us most,' said Tennyson. This was strikingly verified in Wesley's disposition, character, and career. Mrs. Wesley, as shown above,1 was singularly gifted, and godly. She was that strange and influential combination, a practical mystic, and is rightly styled the Mother of Methodism. In her husband's absence she held a so-called conventicle in the kitchen of Epworth Rectory. She fostered in her children, especially in John, the mind's love of God, and fearless inquiry into facts and causes ; withheld him from hindering new methods, as preaching by laymen, which were manifestly owned of God ; and until her death, and by her influence long afterwards, heartened her two sons, John and Charles, in establishing Methodism. She had a robust, full, sober, methodical mind, suffused with womanly emotion and fired by love. Of John she wrote in her diary—' I do intend to be more particularly careful with the soul of this child.' She amply fulfilled her vow. Thursday night was regularly devoted to him while at home, and afterwards also. He pleaded for its continuance. He consulted and discussed points of philosophy, doctrine, and organisation with her. I t was probably for her that he wrote the detailed and ingenuous account of his affair of the heart with Miss Sophia 1 See p. 13. 39 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Hopkey while in Savannah. On the blank outside leaf he quoted the significant Scripture quotation, * Snatched as a brand out of the fire.'1 On the death of his father, Wesley made a home for his mother in his house at City Road Chapel, London, and rejoiced in the full discharge of his filial duty to her. Charles Wesley said he envied him of 4 that glorious burden/ Mrs. Wesley lived to see Methodism in its third year, firmly established by her son John, and rising to music and the sacred song of another son, Charles.2 The former was in Bristol when he heard of her last illness. He left that city on Sunday evening, rode hard the hundred and twenty miles in the hot July weather, and arrived in London on Tuesday, dusty and exhausted ; for, said he, ' I shall never have another mother/ When she died a few days later he fulfilled her last wish by leading a psalm of praise by those round her deathbed. * Bishop Taylor says, " Whether God has forgiven us or no, we know not."' Here Wesley is feeling after and defending the truth which he was to recall and make a distinguishing feature of his teaching—Assurance of Salvation, the Witness of the Holy Spirit to the believer's acceptance in Christ. 8 Thirteen long and weary years must pass before he will know this blessing himself; but even now the logic of the situation convinces him. To his Mother. OXFORD, June 18, 1725, have so well satisfied me as to the tenets of Thomas a Kempis that I have ventured to trouble you once more on a more dubious subject. I have heard DEAR MOTHER,—You 1 The original is in the Wesleyan Conference Office. It is a beautiful specimen of Wesley's handwriting and exquisite neatness, is without abbreviations, and is suitable for reading by an aged person. See Journal, vol. i. p. 288. 2 See note on her approval and sympathy.—Ibid., vol. i. p. 483. 8 Compare his appeals to Lady Maxwell, p. 388. 40 TO FATHER AND MOTHER one 1 I take to be a person of good judgement say that she would advise no one very young to read Dr. Taylor on Holy Living and Dying. She added that he almost put her out of her senses when she was fifteen or sixteen years old, because he seemed to exclude all from being in a way of salvation who did not come up to his rules, some of which are altogether impracticable. A fear of being tedious will make me confine myself to one or two instances, in which I am doubtful, though several others might be produced of almost equal consequence. In reference to humility the Bishop says, ' We must be sure, in some sense or other, to think ourselves the worst in every company where we come.' And in treating of repentance he says, ' Whether God has forgiven us or no, we know n o t ; therefore be sorrowful for ever having sinned.'' I take the more notice of this last sentence because it seems to contradict his own words in the next section, where he says that by the Lord's Supper all the members are united to one another, and to Christ the Head. The Holy Ghost confers on us the graces necessary for, and our souls receive the seeds of, an immortal nature. Now surely these graces are not of so little force as that we cannot perceive whether we have them or n o t ; if we dwell in Christ, and Christ in us, which He will not do unless we are regenerate, certainly we must be sensible of it. If we can never have any certainty of our being in a state of salvation, good reason it is that every moment should be spent, not in joy, but in fear and trembling; and then, undoubtedly in this life, we are of all 1 Probably his ' religious friend,' Miss Betty Kirkham. See below, p. 44. Dr. Augustin Leger of Brest, in La Jeunesse de Wesley, thinks this, rather than May, 1738 (see below, p. 61), was the period of Wesley's Conversion' {Wes. Hist. Proceedings, viii. 3). Certainly Wesley was in an intense spiritual condition, as is shown by the incident which happened then and is related in the next letter, Jan. 27, 1727—a year and a half later. But in all his own accounts Wesley looks back to May 24, 1738, as the day. See below, letter Oct. 30, 1738. 41 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS men most miserable. God deliver us from such a fearful expectation as this ! Humility is undoubtedly necessary to salvation ; and if all these things are essential'to humility, who can be humble, who can be saved ?—I am, Dear mother. Your dutiful and affectionate son. * Curiosity . . . if we had half a dozen Centuries of Life to come.' Just about the time of the above letter an incident occurred which so impressed Wesley that he narrates it in the next letter we give. I t is an impressive glimpse of his motives and methods. He is now four-and-twenty. As he walks this winters night with his consumptive friend in the still aisle of St. Mary's, Oxford, the same moral passion, directness, and winsome tact are seen as will appear a thousand times in the subsequent sixty years of eager endeavour to help men. He knew the things which belong unto their peace.1 To his Mother. OXFORD, January 1727. I am shortly to take my Master's degree. As I shall from that time be less interrupted by business not of my own choosing, I have drawn up for myself a scheme of studies from which I do not intend, for some years at least, to vary. I am perfectly come over to your opinion that there are many truths it is not worth while to know. Curiosity, indeed, might be a sufficient plea for our laying out 1 Hugh Price Hughes, who closely resembled Wesley in these and many features of his work, did the like to this on one occasion when he was himself a Methodist minister in Oxford, and with the same timeliness for the life which he helped. ' Excuse me,' he said to a graduate almost unknown to him whom he accosted in the High Street, * but I am curiously constrained to ask you a question. What is your opinion of Jesus Christ? How does it stand between you and Him ?' ' Mr. Hughes,' was the reply, * I have been waiting for twenty years for some one to ask me that question. Come to my rooms and talk to me.'—Life, by his daughter, p. 144. 42 TO FATHER AND MOTHER some time upon them, if we had half a dozen centuries of life to come ; but methinks it is great ill-husbandry to spend a considerable part of the small pittance now allowed us in what makes us neither a quick nor a sure return. Two days ago I was reading a dispute between those celebrated masters of controversy, Bishop Atterbury and Bishop Hoadly, but must own I was so injudicious as to break off in the middle. I could not conceive that the dignity of the end was at all proportioned to the difficulty of attaining it, and I thought the labour of twenty or thirty hours, if I was sure of succeeding, which I was not, would be ill rewarded by that important piece of knowledge, whether Bishop Atterbury had misunderstood Bishop Hoadly or no. About a year and a half ago I stole out of company at eight in the evening with a young gentleman with whom I was intimate. As we took a turn in an aisle in St. Mary's Church, in expectation of a young lady's funeral with whom we were both acquainted, I asked him if he really thought himself my friend ; and if he did, why he would not do me all the good he could. He began to protest; in which I cut him short by desiring him to oblige me in an instance, which he could not deny to be in his own power; to let me have the pleasure of making him a whole Christian, to which I knew he was half persuaded already ; that he could not do me a greater kindness, as both of us would be fully convinced when we came to follow that young woman. He turned exceedingly serious, and kept something of that disposition ever since. Yesterday was a fortnight, he died of a consumption. I saw him three days before he died, and, on the Sunday following, did him the last good office that I could here by preaching his funeral sermon, which was his desire when living.—I am, Dear mother, Your dutiful and affectionate son. 43 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS ' Implant what Habits I would before the Flexibility of Youth be over.' His mother, a book—Thomas a Kempis's De Imitatione Christi—and the 'meeting with a religious friend,**1 probably Miss Betty Kirkham, have further steadied and stirred Wesley. He is almost minded now to seek cloistral retirement, is very careful of company and worship, and is frugal of time. Doubtless Miss Kirkham was one of ' the persons of whom he never speaks without gratitude,' to whom he alludes here. She is ' Varenese,' one of a small circle of his intimate correspondents. He met her two years before this letter, and with important results for himself. ' Meeting likewise a religious friend, which I never had till now, I began to alter the whole form of my conversation and to set in earnest upon a new life.'* What a headmaster Wesley would have made! His hobby for many years, and his least successful enterprise, was his school for boys at Kingswood. This letter, with many personal details, is from the original, and is much more completely given than in his Works. To his Mother. LINC[OLN COLLEGE], [OXFORD], March 19, 1726/7. One advantage, a t least, my Degree has given me : I am now at liberty, and shall be in a great measure for some time, to choose my own employment. And as I believe I know my own deficiencies best, and which of them are most necessary to be supplied, I hope my time will turn to somewhat better account than when it was not so much in my own disposal. On Saturday next I propose beginning an entirely new life, with relation to the management of my expenses, from what I have hitherto done. I expect then to receive a sum of money, and intend immediately to call in all my 1 For the evidence of identification of this * friend' with Miss Kirkham, see his Journal, vol. i. p. 13. 44 TO FATHER AND MOTHER creditors'* bills (that they may not grow by lying by, as it sometimes happens), and from that time forward to trust no man of what sort or trade soever, so far as to let him trust me. Dear mother, I speak what I know: my being little and weak, whereas had it not been for a strange concurrence of accidents (so called in the language of men) 1 should very probably be just the reverse, I can easily account for; I can readily trace the wisdom and mercy of Providence in allotting me these imperfections. (Though what if I should not ? Since while I look through a glass I can only expect to see darkly.) But here the difficulty was likely to lie: Why should Infinite Goodness permit me to contract a habit of sin, even before I knew it to be sinful, which has been a thorn in my side ever since ? ' How can I skill of these Thy ways ?' So well, that I am verily persuaded, had it not been for that sinful habit I had scarce ever acquired any degree of any virtuous one. Is not this the finger of God ? Surely no one else could have extracted so much good from evil! Surely it was mercy not to hear my prayer! The conversation of one or two persons, whom you may have heard me speak of (I hope never without gratitude), first took off my relish for most other pleasures, so far that I despised them in comparison of that. From thence I have since proceeded a step further; to slight them absolutely. And I am so little at present in love with even company—the most elegant entertainment next to books—that, unless the persons have a peculiar turn of thought, I am much better pleased without them. I think it is the settled temper of my soul that I should prefer, at least for some time, such a retirement as would seclude me from all the world, to the station I am now in. Not that this is by any means unpleasant to me ; but I imagine it would be more improving 45 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS to be in a place where I might confirm or implant in my mind what habits I would, without interruption, before the flexibility of youth be over, than to stay where, among many advantages, I lie under the inconvenience of being almost necessarily exposed to so much impertinence and vanity. A school in Yorkshire, 40 miles from Doncaster, was proposed to me lately, on which I shall think more when it appears whether I may have it or not. A good salary is annexed to it, so that in a year's time 'tis probable all my debts would be paid and I should have money beforehand. But what has made me wish for it most is the frightful description, as they call it, which some gentlemen who know the place gave me of it yesterday. ' The town (Skipton in Craven), lies in a little vale, so pent up between two hills that it is scarcely accessible on any side: so that you can expect little company from without, and within there is none at all.' I should therefore be entirely at liberty to converse with company of my own choosing, whom for that reason I would bring with me: and company equally agreeable, wherever I fixed, could not put me to less expense. e The sun that walks his airy way To cheer the world, and bring the day; The moon that shines with borrow'd light; The stars that gild the gloomy night; All of these, and all I see, Should be sung, and sung by me: These praise their Maker as they can, But want and ask the tongue of man/ The text of that sermon I preached on the Sunday following Mr. Griffith's death was, 'Now he is dead, wherefore should I fast ? Can I bring him back again ? I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me.' I never gave 46 TO FATHER AND MOTHER more reason to suspect my doctrine did not agree with my practice, for a sickness and pain in my stomach, attended with a violent looseness which seized me the day he was buried, altered me so much in three days, and made me look so pale and thin, that those who saw me could not help but observe it. A letter from my sister Emily, my brother tells me, was brought to my chambers the other day; but wherever the fellow laid it, I have not been able to set my eye on it from that day to this. I am full of business, but have found a way to write without taking any time from that. It is but rising an hour sooner in the morning, and going into company an hour later in the evening : both which may be done without any inconvenience. My brother has got the other side away from me.—I am, Dear Mother, Your affectionate, dutiful son. I return you thanks for your thoughts on Zeal, and my sister Emily for hers on—I know not what. However, I am persuaded they were very good. My love attend my other sisters; I should have said, brother Charles too. A Letter from his Father. Four months later Wesley, still at Oxford, received the following letter from his father, the Reverend Samuel Wesley, M.A. 1 (1662-1735), Rector of Epworth, Lincolnshire. It is copied from the original. On the third side of the sheet is a letter to Wesley's brother Charles, also at Oxford. It shows the home into which these Wesley letters went. Here is the mother, now in broken health ; and here is the father, quaint, feeling the effects of his service at his two charges at Epworth and Wroot, but tenacious as ever. The ' perfect harmony' in the family is a contrast to its tone 1 See Tyerman's Life and Times of Reverend Samuel Wesley, M.A. 47 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS sometimes.1 Wesley's father is described, in fiction, as an ogre. He was something of a martinet, and held the views of his time that a father is a magistrate in his family, and that the claims of women, even daughters, are fewer and lower than those of men, even boys.2 He anticipated his sons in the emphasis they placed upon Assurance and the Witness of the Spirit, and foresaw the Evangelical Revival. His dying testimony to his son John was, ' The inward witness, son, the inward witness, this is the proof, the strongest proof, of Christianity'; and he often laid his hands upon the head of Charles and said, ' Be steady. The Christian Faith will surely revive in this kingdom ; you shall see it, though I shall not/ He strongly wished that his son John should succeed him as Rector of Epworth. This he declined in a long, argumentative letter. He was later to look upon all the world as his parish. 8 From Wesley's Father to John Wesley. WROOT, July 18, 1727. received last packet your compliments of condolence and congratulation to your mother on the supposition of her near approaching demise, to which your sister Patty will by no means subscribe, for she says she is not so good a philosopher as you are, and that she DEAR SON JOHN,—We 1 2 See Clarke's Wesley Family. These lines by Wesley's elder brother Samuel, then away from home, show us the Rector and his family and home in a comical, not unkindly light. ' Methinks I see you striving all Who first shall answer to his call, Or lusty Nan or feeble Moll Sage Pat or sober Hetty ; To rub his cassock's draggled tail, Or reach his hat from off the nail, Or seek the key to draw his ale When damsel haps to steal it; To burn his pipe, or mend his clothes, Or wisely darn his russet hose, For comfort of his aged toes So fine they cannot feel it.' Then comes in a letter from Jack or Jacky, as they called the clever son and brother at Oxford. 8 See his letter to his brother Samuel below, p. 56. 48 TO FATHER AND MOTHER can't spare her mother yet, if it please God, without very great inconveniency. And indeed, though she has now and then some very sick fits, yet I know the sight of you would revive her. However, when you come you will see a new face on things, my family being now pretty well colonised (?) and all perfect harmony, much happier in no small straits than perhaps we ever were before in the greatest affluence, and you 11 find a servant that will make us rich, if God gives him leave, and us anything for him to work upon. I know not but it may be this prospect, together with my easiness in my family, which keeps my spirits from sinking, tho' they tell me IVe lost some of my tallow between Wroot and Epworth. But that I don't value as long as I Ve strength still left to perform my office. If Charles can get to London, I believe Hardsley at the Red Lion, Aldersgate St., might procure him a horse, as reasonably as any, to ride along with you to Lincoln [City], and direct him where to leave it there, with the carrier to return, which will be the cheapest and safest way; and I warrant you we will find means to bring Charles up again. Your own best way, as in my case, will be to buy a horse for yourself (J. F.) for the reasons I then told you.—I'm weary, but Your loving father, SAM. WESLEY. ' O u r little Company,' the Oxford Methodists, 'is shrunk into almost none at all.' Wesley, probably with his brother Charles, has been home to Epworth. They have evidently walked there from Oxford and back. Wesley was fond of walking. Of money he had little, and wanted all for charities. With this letter to his father was one to his mother. To her he says that the walking ' and the sun together in our hundred and fifty miles walk so carried off all our superfluous humours that D 49 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS we continue perfectly in health, though it is here a very sickly season/ His father and all at the Rectory were much interested in i our little company.'' These are the Oxford Methodists. 1 The name had been used several times before for persons who were markedly methodical, but it was now stuck by a wit of Christ Church College upon a little company of students, a religious fellowship, of which Charles Wesley was founder. Of all the names given to them this was to survive and to become one of the commonest in religious nomenclature. John Wesley became chief of these Oxford Methodists, and was nicknamed ; the Curator of the Holy Club.1* These Methodist tutors, graduates, and undergraduates lived by rule and very frugally, had practically all things in common, studied steadily, observed punctiliously the regulations of their colleges, the University, and the Church, and urged others to do the same. They spent their leisure in visiting and relieving the poor, the prisoners in the Castle, and in teaching children. Critics and detractors were many. The next two letters show some. Wesley's father cordially approved of all this earnest work. His excellent hymn beginning * Behold the Saviour of mankind/ was a notable contribution to the Methodist evangel, and was wondrously useful. To his Father. June 11,1731. Our walk was not so pleasant to Oxford as from it, though in one respect it was more useful, for it let us see that four or five-and-twenty miles is an easy and safe day's journey in hot weather as well as cold. We have made another discovery too, which may be of some service; that it is easy to read as we walk ten or twelve miles, and that it neither makes us faint nor gives us any other symptom of weariness more than the mere walking without reading at all. 1 50 Tyerman's The Oxford Methodists. TO FATHER AND MOTHER Since our return, our little company that used to meet us on a Sunday evening is shrunk into almost none at all. Mr. Morgan is sick at Holt; Mr. Boyce is at his father's house at Barton; Mr. Kirkham must very shortly leave Oxford to be his uncle's curate; and a young gentleman of Christ Church who used to make a fourth, either afraid or ashamed, or both, is returned to the ways of the world, and studiously shuns our company. However, the poor at the Castle have still the gospel preached to them and some of their temporal wants supplied, our little fund rather increasing than diminishing. Nor have we yet been forced to discharge any of the children which Mr. Morgan left to our care. Though I wish they too do not find the want of him, I am sure some of their parents will. Some, however, give us a better prospect; John Whitelamb in particular. 1 I believe with this you will receive some account from himself how his time is employed. He reads one English, one Latin, and one Greek book alternately, and never meddles with a new one in any of the languages till he has ended the old one. If he goes on as he has begun, I dare take upon me to say that, by the time he has been here four or five years, there will not be such an one of his standing in Lincoln College, perhaps not in the University of Oxford.—I am, Your dutiful and affectionate son. 'Diminution of Fortune, Friends, and Reputation. 9 Wesley's ' fortune," or income, was very limited ; his use of it in altruistic efforts was lavish. He states of an Oxford Methodist 2 —himself—that when he had £30 a year he lived on p£28, and gave away forty shillings. The next year, receiving i?60, he still lived on i?28, and gave away £&% The third year he received £ 9 0 and gave away £G&. The 1 2 Whitelamb married Wesley's sister Mary. Works, vol. vii. p. 36. See also below, p. 65. 51 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS fourth year he received c^l&O. Still he lived as before on £28, and gave to the poor £92. Here is a strong, brave letter— To his Father. [OXFORD], June 13, 1733. The effects of my last journey, I believe, will make me more cautious of staying any time from Oxford for the future, at least till I have no pupils to take care of, which probably will be within a year or two. One of my young gentlemen told me at my return that he was more and more afraid of singularity; another, that he had read an excellent piece of Mr. Locke's which had convinced him of the mischief of regarding authority. Both of them agreed that the observing of Wednesday as a fast was an unnecessary singularity, the Catholic Church (that is, the majority of it) having long since repealed, by contrary custom, the injunction she formerly gave concerning it. A third, who could not yield to this argument, has been convinced by a fever, and Dr. Frewin. Our seven-and-twenty communicants at St. Mary's were on Monday shrunk to five; and the day before, the last of Mr. Clayton's pupils, who continued with us, informed me that he did not design to meet us any more. My ill-success, as they call it, seems to be what has frightened every one away from a falling house. On Sunday I was considering the matter a little more nearly, and imagined that all the ill consequences of my singularity were reducible to three—diminution of fortune, loss of friends and reputation. As to my fortune, I well know, though perhaps others do not, that I could not have borne a larger than I have; and as for that most plausible excuse for desiring it, ' While I have so little, I cannot do the good I would,' I ask, * Can you do the good God would have you 52 TO FATHER AND MOTHER do ? I t is enough ! Look no further.' For friends, they were either trifling or serious. If serious, those who are more serious are left, whom the others would rather have opposed than forwarded in the service they have done, and still do us. If it be said,' But these may leave you too, for they are no firmer than the others were,' first, I doubt that fact; but next, suppose they should, we hope then they would only teach us a nobler and harder lesson than they have done hitherto. ' I t is better to trust in the Lord than to put any confidence in man.'' And as for reputation, though it be a glorious instrument of advancing our Master's service, yet there is a better than that—a clean heart, a single eye, a soul full of God ! A fair exchange, if by the loss of reputation we can purchase the lowest degree of purity of heart! We beg my mother and you would not cease to work together with us, that, whatever we lose, we may gain this; and that, having tasted of this good gift, we may count all things else but dung and dross in comparison of it.-—I am, Dear father, Your dutiful and affectionate son. ' T h e Subject of Christian Liberty.' This hitherto almost unknown letter, reproduced here in facsimile, brings out young Wesley's analytical skill and his sanity. He always felt and taught the value of rules— 6 prudential regulations' he called them—and of the means of grace. Neglect and contempt of them was too high for him. To his Mother. OXON., January 13, 1734[5]. DEAR MOTHER,—Give me leave to say once more that our Folks do, and will, I suppose, to the end of the chapter, mistake the Question. Supposing him changed, say they. 58 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Right, but that Supposition has not Proof yet, whatever it may have. When it has, then we may come to our other Point, whether all this be not Providence, i.e. Blessing: and whether we are empowered so to judge, condemn, and execute an Imprudent Christian, as, God forbid, I should ever use a Turk or Deist. I have had a great deal of conversation lately on the subject of Christian Liberty, and should be glad of your thoughts as to the several notions of it which Good Men entertain. I perceive different Persons take it in at least six Different Senses. 1. For Liberty from wilful Sin in opposition to the bondage from natural Corruption. 2. For Liberty as to Rites and Points of Discipline. So Mr. Whiston says: 4 Though the Stations were constituted by the Apostles, yet the Liberty of the Christian Law dispenses with them on extraordinary Occasions.' 3. For Liberty from denying ourselves in little things; for trifles 'tis commonly thought we may indulge in safely, because Christ hath made us free. This notion I a little doubt, is not sound. 4. For Liberty from fear, or a Filial Freedom in our intercourse with GOD. A Christian, says Dr. Knight, is free from Fear on account of his past sins, for he believes in Christ, and Hope frees him from Fear of losing his present labour, or of being a Castaway hereafter. 5. Christian Liberty is taken by some for a Freedom from Restraint as to Sleep or Food. So they would say, Your drinking not one glass of Wine, or my rising at fixed hours was contrary to Christian Liberty. Lastly, it is taken for Freedom from Rules. If by this he meant making our Rules yield to extraordinary occasions, well: If, the having no Prudential Rules, this Liberty is as yet too high for me, I cannot attain unto it. 54 TO FATHER AND MOTHER We join in begging yours and my Father's Blessing, and wishing you a Happy Year.—I am, Dear mother, Your dutiful and affectionate son. [Addressed] To Mrs. Wesley at Epworth. To be left at the Posthouse, In Gainsbro', Lincolnshire. per London. 55 CHAPTER I I I TO HIS BROTHERS AND SISTER—THE REV. SAMUEL WESLEY, JUNR., REV. CHARLES WESLEY, AND MISS MARTHA WESLEY ' I can better serve God and His Church in my present Station.' was much attached to his brothers and sisters, and they to him. The severe financial limitations and struggles of the Epworth Rector's family drew its members together. In conversation, in letter, and in literary products their affection, wit, high controversial and poetic gifts were displayed and developed. Wesley freely corresponded with them all, often with Samuel, and their sister Martha, and with his greatest coadjutor, Charles, the youngest but one in the large family. His eldest brother, the Rev. Samuel Wesley, Jun., M.A., Headmaster of Blunders School, Tiverton, strongly urged his acceptance of a parish cure, and that of Epworth. Wesley sent him a copy of the letter he had sent to their father declining this proposal.1 Here is his final decision, and reason for it. This was a critical hour. He remained at his beloved Oxford. The next year he was to leave it, never to return, except as a visitor. WESLEY To his brother Samuel. OXFORD, March 4, 1735. had rather dispute with you, if I must dispute, than with any man living, because it may be done with so little expense of time and words. The question DEAR BROTHER,—I 1 56 See above, p. 52. TO BROTHERS AND SISTER is now brought to one point, and the whole argument will lie in one syllogism : ' Neither hope of doing greater good, nor fear of any evil, ought to deter you from what you have engaged yourself to do: but you have engaged yourself to undertake the cure of a parish; therefore, neither that hope nor that fear ought to deter you from it."' The only doubt which remains is, whether I have so engaged myself or not. You think I did at my ordination, ' before God and His High Priest'; I think I did not. However, I own I am not the proper judge of the oath I then took, it being certain, and allowed by all, Verbis, in quae quis jurejurando adigitur, sensum genuinum, ut et obligationi sacrementi rnodum ac mensuram, prcestitui a mente non prcestantis sed exigentis juramentum: 4 That the true sense of the words of an oath, and the mode and extent of its obligation, are not to be determined by him who takes it, but by him who requires it."' Therefore it is not I, but the High Priest of God, before whom I contracted that engagement, who is to judge of the nature and extent of it. Accordingly, the post after I received yours, I referred it entirely to him, proposing this single question to him: Whether I had, at my ordination, engaged myself to undertake the cure of a parish or no. His answer runs in these words: * It does not seem to me that, at your ordination, you engaged yourself to undertake the cure of any parish, provided you can, as a clergyman, better serve God and His Church in your present or some other station. 1 Now that I can, as a clergyman, better serve God and His Church in my present station, I have all reasonable evidence.—I am, Dear brother, Your most affectionate friend and brother. ' The whole Question turns on Matter of Fact.' Wesley has been to Georgia as missionary, and is now within a few months of his spiritual epoch of May 24,1788. 57 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS His brother Samuel thought' the knowledge of salvation by the remission of our sins * a new faith. He also besought the brothers to ' banish extemporary exposition and extemporary prayers.' Wesley here uses the Baconian argument. He will often use it, and will accumulate material for so wide an induction as will make his conclusions irresistible. { What we have felt and seen With confidence we tell, And publish to the sons of men The signs infallible/ To his brother Samuel. BRISTOL,1 April 4, 1738. DEAR BROTHER,—I rejoice greatly at the temper with which you now write, and trust there is not only mildness but love in your heart. If so, you shall know of this doctrine, whether it be of God, though perhaps not by my ministry. To this hour you have pursued an ignoratio elenchi. Your assurance and mine are as different as light and darkness. I mean, an assurance that I am now in a state of salvation; you, an assurance that I shall persevere therein. The very definition of the term cuts off your second and third observation. As to the first I would take notice. 1st. No kind of assurance (that I know) or of faith, or repentance, is essential to their salvation who die infants. 2nd. I believe God is ready to give all true penitents who fly to His free grace in Christ a fuller sense of pardon than they had before they fell. I know this to be true of several: whether these are exempt cases, I know not. 3rd. Persons that were of a melancholy and gloomy constitution, even to some degree of madness, I have known in a moment (let it be called a miracle, I quarrel not) brought into a state of firm lasting peace and joy. 1 So in Works, vol. xii. p. 3 0 ; but this is an error, as Wesley was at Dummer.—-Journal, vol. i. p. 450. 58 TO BROTHERS AND SISTER My dear brother, the whole question turns chiefly, if not wholly, on matter of fact. You deny that God does now work these effects; at least that He works them in such a manner. I affirm both, because I have heard those facts with my ears, and seen them with my eyes. I have seen (as far as it can be seen) very many persons changed in a moment, from the spirit of horror, fear, and despair, to the spirit of hope, joy, peace; and from sinful desires, till then reigning over them, to a pure desire of doing the will of God. These are matters of fact whereof I have been, and almost daily am, eye- or ear-witness. What (upon the same evidence, as to the suddenness and reality of the change) I believe, or know, touching visions and dreams: this I know, several persons in whom this great change from the power of Satan unto God, was wrought either in sleep or during a strong representation to the eye of their minds of Christ, either on the Cross or in glory. This is the fact. Let any judge of it as they please. But that such a change was then wrought appears not from their shedding tears only, or sighing, or singing psalms, as your poor correspondent did by the woman of Oxford, but from the whole tenor of their life, till then many ways wicked; from that time holy, just, and good. Saw you him that was a lion till then and is now a lamb : he that was a drunkard, but now exemplarily sober : the whoremonger that was, that now abhors the very lusts of the flesh? These are my living arguments for what I assert, that God now, as aforetime, gives remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Ghost, which may be called visions. If it be not so, I am found a false witness; but, however, I do and will testify the things I have both seen and heard. I do not now expect to see your face in the flesh. Not that I believe God will discharge you yet, but I believe 59 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS I have nearly finished my course. O may I be found in Him, not having my own righteousness. c When I Thy promis'd Christ have seen. And claspt Him in my soul's embrace, Possess'd of Thy salvation then, Then may I, Lord, depart in peace.' The great blessing of God be upon you and yours.—I am, Dear brother, Your ever affectionate and obliged brother. I expect to stay here some time, perhaps as long as I am in the body. ' In this sense I was not a Christian till May the 24th last past.' Here is, in some respects, the most interesting of all Wesley's letters. It was written at half-past five on a winter Monday morning, and carefully. ' Singing' and ' writ to Brother Samuel ? are the only entries in his diary until half-past eight that day. It may well be read and re-read. I t deals with the spiritual crisis in his life, which he thought, and his truest interpreters regard, as supremely important. Lecky, the historian of that century, wrote : * It is scarcely an exaggeration to say that the scene which took place at that humble meeting in Aldersgate Street forms an epoch in English history.'' By the printed page used in that great hour Wesley touched Luther, and Luther touched St. Paul. What a living line ! Candour, humility, and Christian confidence throb in the letter. Its faithful opening words and closing appeal from this younger brother must have moved the heart of Samuel Wesley, scholar, poet, clergyman as he was, and not less that of his wife Ursula. The day, 'May 24 last past,' is now five months away. Wesley's ' cooler thoughts'—to use a favourite expression of his—here tell the meaning of its solemn and glad events. He contrasts it with an earlier day, January 8. Then he was 6 in the midst of the great deep' and ' bitterness of soul.' He gives them his diary's 60 TO BROTHERS AND SISTER quivering record of his self-analysis. But that is all past, and serves only as a dark background for the brightness and beauty of the evening of May 24, when a light shone from heaven upon him. Wesley's great Day. On that memorable day Wesley was in London, as he is when he writes the letter below to his brother Samuel. He tells us the occupations of the day, every hour of which seemed to lead him onward towards a transforming experience. The full story is given in his Journal^ In the morning he opened upon Scriptures which told him,' There are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises,"1 and ' Thou art not far from the Kingdom of God.'' In the afternoon, at St. Paul's Cathedral, the anthem seemed to voice his anxiety in its words,' Out of the deep have I called unto thee, O Lord.' ' In the evening,' he says, ' I went very unwillingly to a society in Aldersgate Street, where one 2 was reading Luther's preface to the Epistle to the Romans. About a quarter before nine, while he was describing the change which God works in the heart through faith in Christ, I felt my heart strangely warmed. I felt I did trust in Christ, Christ alone for salvation: and an assurance was given me that He had taken away my sins, even mine, and saved me from the law of sin and death.' To his brother Samuel. LONDON, October 30, 1738. you will always receive kindly what is so intended, I doubt not. Therefore I again recommend the character of Susurrus 3 both to you and my sister,4 as (whether real or feigned) striking at the root of a fault, DEAR BROTHER,—That 1 2 Vol. i. pp. 46S-77. For the ' one' who was reading, probably William Holland, and the actual words read, see Wes. Hist. Proc, vol. viii. p. 61 and p. 2. 3 One of the character studies in Law's Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life> chap. xxii. 4 He means his sister-in-law, Samuel Wesley's wife. 61 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS of which both she and you were, I think, more guilty than any other two persons I have known in my life. O may God deliver both you and me from all bitterness and evilspeaking, as well as from all false doctrine, heresy, and schism ! With regard to my own character, and my doctrine likewise, I shall answer you very plainly. By a Christian I mean one who so believes in Christ as that sin hath no more dominion over him : and in this obvious sense of the word I was not a Christian until May the 24th last past. For till then sin had the dominion over me, although I fought with it continually ; but surely, then, from that time to this it hath not—such is the free grace of God in Christ. What sins they were which till then reigned over me, and from which, by the grace of God, I am now free, I am ready to declare on the house-top, if it may be for the glory of God. If you ask by what means I am made free (though not perfect, neither infallibly sure of my perseverance), I answer, By faith in Christ; by such a sort or degree of faith as I had not till that day. My desire of this faith I knew long before, though not so clearly till Sunday, January the 8th last, when, being in the midst of the great deep, I wrote a few lines, in the bitterness of my soul, some of which I have transcribed; and may the good God sanctify them both to you and me! ' By the most infallible of all proofs, inward feeling, I am convinced— 6 1 . Of unbelief; having no such faith in Christ as will prevent my heart being troubled; which it could not be if I believed in God, and rightly believed also in Him ; < £. Of pride throughout my past life; insomuch I thought I had what I find I had not. Lord, save me or I perish! Save me— 62 TO BROTHERS AND SISTER ' (1) By such a faith in Thee and in Thy Christ as implies trust, confidence, peace in life and death; 6 (£) By such humility as may fill my heart from this hour for ever with a piercing, interrupted sense, nihil est quod hactenus feci J- having evidently built without a foundation; 6 (3) By such a recollection that I may cry to Thee every moment, but more especially when all is calm (if it should so please Thee), " Give me faith or I die ! Give me a lowly spirit, otherwise mihi non sit suave vivere."2 Amen ! Come, Lord Jesus ! Tie Aa/3tS, iXerjaov fie.7 3 Some measure of this faith, which bringeth salvation or victory over sin, and which implies peace and trust in God through Christ, I now enjoy by His free mercy ; though in very deed it is in me but as a grain of mustard-seed: for the ir\r}po(j>opLa iria-rem 4 —the seal of the Spirit—the love of God shed abroad in my heart and producing joy in the Holy Ghost, ' joy which no man taketh away, joy unspeakable and full of glory'; this witness of the Spirit I have not, but I patiently wait for it. I know many who have already received i t ; more than one or two in the very hour we were praying for it. And having seen and spoken with a cloud of witnesses abroad,5 as well as in my own country, I cannot doubt but that believers who wait and pray for it will find these scriptures fulfilled in themselves. My hope is, that they will be fulfilled in me; I build on Christ, the Rock of Ages, on His sure mercies described in His word, and on His promises, all of which I know are near5 and amen. Those who have not yet received joy in 1 2 3 4 5 * What I have been hitherto doing amounts to nothing.' ' May life itself no longer be pleasant to me.' * Son of David, have mercy upon me.' 'Fulness of faith.' A reference to his visit to the Moravians. See below, p. 69. 63 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS the Holy Ghost, the love of God, and the plerophory of faith (any or all of which I take to be the witness of the Spirit with our spirit that we are the sons of God), I believe to be Christians in that imperfect sense wherein I may call myself such; and I exhort them to pray that God would give them also ' t o rejoice in the hope of the glory of God," and to feel ' His love shed abroad in their hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto them.' On men I build not, neither on Matilda Chipman's word, whom I have not talked with five minutes in my life, nor on anything peculiar in the weak, well-meant relation of William Hervey, who yet is a serious, humble-acting Christian. But have you been building on these ? Yes; I find them, more or less, in almost every letter you have written on the subject. Yet were all that has been said on ' visions, dreams, and balls of fire ' to be fairly proposed in syllogisms, I believe it would not prove a jot more on one than on the other side of the question. O brother, would to God you would leave disputing concerning the things which you know not (if indeed you know them not), and beg of God to fill up what is yet wanting in you ! Why should not you also seek till you receive ' that peace of God which passeth all understanding'? Who shall hinder you, notwithstanding the manifold temptations, from rejoicing with joy unspeakable, by reason of glory ? Amen, Lord Jesus! May you, and all who are near of kin to you (if you have it not already), feel His love shed abroad in your hearts, by His Spirit which dwelleth in you, and be sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, which is the earnest of your inheritance.—I am, Yours and my sister's most affectionate brother. 64 WESLEY'S LETTER TO HIS MOTHER From O X F O R D , January 13, 1734-5 FACSIMILE from the ORIGINAL in the Collection of Mr. Russell J. Colman, D.L., J.P., Norwich THE TEXT of this LETTER is given on page 5 3 LETTERS OF JOHN WESLEY BY REV. GEORGE EAYRS, F . R H I S T . S . Published by Hodder & Stoughton, London, Toronto, New York 1916 TO BROTHERS AND SISTER ' Did you not thoroughly understand what my Brother and I were doing?' They were doing wonders, as divine instruments, by now. Methodism had been established more than twenty years. But of Wesley it was true, in part, that ' neither did his brethren believe in him/ Even his favourite sister Martha (Mrs. Hall) did not become a Methodist. Except in this, Wesley and she were remarkably alike: in disposition, character, and appearance. In the last, Adam Clarke said that they were indistinguishable except by their clothes. Her attitude did not hinder nor lessen his kindness. Mrs. Hall lived in the Methodist Chapel House, West Street, London. Here too is his ready response to her special appeal, although his legacy from Miss Lewen was exhausted. This latest gift 1 was i?l,000. He gave it all away by fifties and hundreds. ' Hundreds and thousands of people are for ever draining Mr. Wesley's pocket to the last shilling,' said Thomas Olivers. Wesley declared, ' Money must needs pass through my hands; but I will take care it shall not rest there.' To his sister, Mrs, Martha Hall, Near NEWCASTLE-ON-TYNE, June 14, 1761. should any of us live in the world without doing a little good in it ? I am glad you have made a beginning. See that you are not weary of well-doing, for it will often be a cross. But bear the cross; the best fruit grows under the cross. I have often thought it strange that so few of my relations should be of any use to me in the work of God. My sister Wright was, of whom I should least have expected i t ; but it was only for a short season. My sister Emily and you, of whom one might have expected more, have, I know DEAR PATTY,—Why 1 E See below, p. 370. 65 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS not how, kept at a distance, and sometimes cavilled a little, at other times, as it were, approved, but never heartily joined in the work. Where did it stick? Did you not thoroughly understand what my brother and I were doing ? Did you not see the truth? or did the cause lie in your heart? You had no will to join hand in hand. You wanted resolution, spirit, patience. Well, the day is far spent. What you do, do quickly. 4 Life for delay no time will give.' My work in the country cannot be finished before the latter end of August, as the circuit is now larger by some hundred miles than when I was in the north two years ago. O let the one thing be ever uppermost in oar thoughts! To promote either your temporal or eternal good will always be a pleasure to, Dear Patty, Your affectionate brother. ' Money never stays with vie.' To his sister, Mrs. Martha Hall. KINGSWOOI), October 6, 1768. DEAR PATTY,—You do not consider, money never stays with me : it would burn me if it did. I throw it out of my hands as soon as possible, lest it should find a way into my heart. Therefore you should have spoken to me while I was in London, and before Miss Lewen's money flew away. However, I know not but I may still spare you £59 provided you will not say, ' I will never ask you again,' because this is more than you can tell; and you must not promise more than you can perform. O how busy are mankind! and about what trifles! Things that pass away as a dream. Vanity of vanities, all is vanity, but to love and serve God.—I am, Dear Patty, Your ever affectionate brother. 66 TO BROTHERS AND SISTER Wesley's great Colleague. Wesley's brother, the Rev. Charles Wesley, M.A. (17071788), closely identified with him and frequently by his side, needed few letters from him. Some of those sent follow here. Charles was four years younger than John, and predeceased him by three years. An earlier Oxford Methodist than John, he also entered into the rest and rapture of conscious pardon a few days before him. But he easily waived these and any claims to leadership because of the natural primacy of John, whom he admired and loved with all the wealth of his emotional nature. ' John and Charles Wesley' were the names on almost countless Methodist publications, and are on the nation's tribute in Westminster Abbey. It is the true order. Together they founded and built Methodism. Alike in their conception of their duty to God and man, and of man's chief end and need, they were equal in their complete devotion. They both had the heroic strain, were absolutely faithful to conviction, and fearless in obedience to it. Ease, ambition, fame, and money attracted neither. In gifts and service they were contrasted and complementary. John's genius was for logic, argument, rule, construction; that of Charles for intuition, the-lyric, persuasion, submission. John was the greater master and manager of men; Charles, at his best, had the finer powers of popular appeal in sermon and in song. His Oxford University sermon, on the t e x t ' Awake, thou that sleepest,' is one of the greatest sermons in the world. His hymn 6 Jesu, lover of my soul' is the best loved prayer-song of the human spirit, and that beginning ' Come, O thou traveller unknown' is the supreme lyric of Christian mysticism. Nevertheless, the calm, logical, terse discourses of John Wesley more deeply affected his hearers both at the time and permanently than did those of Charles. Wesley's translations of German hymns also have all the worth of original compositions, and are of the highest order. He knew the unsurpassed gift of his brother Charles, and constantly stirred him to its exercise, as in these letters; but Wesley had a severer, more strictly classical taste than had his brother. The hymns of 67 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Charles owed much of their final excellence to his brother's criticism and revision. By the curious irony of occasion and circumstance it fell to Charles, the more conservative of the brothers, to be in some things the innovator and first violator of Church rubric and order. His hymns, hymn-singing, and services lacked episcopal authority, and he first gave the Lord's Supper in an unconsecrated building to the Methodists. He was horrified to find himself arraigned before the justices for sympathising with the Pretender, because he prayed that ' God would bring home His banished'—a Scripture euphemism for unconverted people. Despite his strong wish and careful arrangements, his remains were interred in unconsecrated ground. The brothers were completely loyal to each other, and such differences between them as these letters disclose were generally concerned with Church order. For this Charles was a stickler. He wrote to John Nelson, one of the most remarkable and useful of the preachers, ' John, I love thee from my heart: yet rather than see thee a Dissenting minister, I wish to see thee smiling in thy coffin."'1 John Wesley allowed himself to be directed by the logic of facts. He said, ' Soul-damning clergy lay me under more difficulties than soul-saving laymen'; and, ' Church or no Church, we must attend to the work of saving souls.' When Charles threatened to leave the Conference if laymen were allowed to join in its discussions, John promptly said to his neighbour, ' Give my brother his hat.' * The People here,' Herrnhut, Germany. Wesley was among the Moravian Brethren at their German settlement, Herrnhut. His account of the visit, to be given when ' face to face' with his brother Charles, fills sixty pages of his Journal Evidently, by his exhortations in this letter, he has been profoundly affected by the sermons of Christian David, the mechanic lay-preacher, and by the life of what he calls ' this lovely people.' Here he 1 68 Jackson's Life of Charles Wesley, vol. i. p. 184. TO BROTHERS AND SISTER saw open-air services, meetings for testimony and fellowship, lay-preachers, itinerating preachers, and orphan homes. Without restriction as to sex, special training, or priestly ordination, the members employed their gifts; and over all their life, public and private, were the simplicity and gladness of New Testament Christianity. To his brother Charles. HERRNHUTJ August 4, 1738. far hath God greatly helped us in all things. An account of the people here you must not expect till we come face to face, when I hope we shall part no more. O that, after I have proved all things, I may be enabled throughly Sofafid^ecv ra hta^epovra^ and, calling no man master, in faith, practice, and discipline, to hold fast to that which is good ! Salute our brethren in London and Oxford by name; and exhort them all in the name of the Lord Jesus that they love and study the oracles of God more and more; that they work out their salvation with fear and trembling, never imagining they have already attained, or are already perfect; never deceiving themselves, as if they had now less need than before to be serious, watchful, lowly-minded; and that, above all things, they use great plainness of speech, both with each other and towards all men. My dearest brother and friend, I commend you to the grace of God, to be more and more renewed in the image of his Son ! Pray ye all for me continually ! Adieu ! DEAR BROTHER,—Thus * If it be just to obey Men rather than God, judge ye.5 A letter which echoes the solemn decision of Peter and John at Jerusalem (Acts vi.), of Luther at Worms, and of Wesley's nonconforming ancestors, Bartholomew and John 1 ' To distinguish things that are different.' 69 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Wesley, and Samuel Annesley.1 Here are asserted the right of private judgement, supremacy of conscience, freedom for nonconformity and dissent; and the inference of divine approval by divine results. In this birth-year of Methodism its birthright is claimed. These principles will make Wesley the greatest innovator of his age, and, despite his continued membership in the Church of England, the human founder of the largest of all the separated free Protestant communions. Among ' them which trouble Wesley' at this stage in this matter is the learned and saintly Bishop Butler. The wonderful work of Methodism in Bristol has begun,2 Whitefield and Wesley being the instruments. With characteristic deference Wesley consults the bishop of the diocese. Butler said, ' Well, sir, since you ask my advice, I will give it freely. You have no business here; you are not commissioned to preach in this diocese. Therefore I advise you to go hence.' Wesley replied, 6 My lord, my business on earth is to do what good I can. Wherever, therefore, I think I can do most good, there must I stay, so long as I think so. A t present I think I can do most good here; therefore here I stay.' To his brother Charles. BRISTOL, June 23, 1739. answer to them which trouble me is this; God commands me to do good unto all men; to instruct the ignorant, reform the wicked, confirm the virtuous. Man commands me not to do this in another's parish; that is, in effect, not to do it at all. If it be just to obey men rather than God, judge ye. 'But,' they say, ' i t is just that you submit yourself to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake.' T r u e ; to every ordinance of man which is not contrary to the comDEAR BROTHER,—My 1 See my chapter, * Links Between the Ejected Clergy and Methodism,' in The Ejectment 0/1662. 2 See my Wesley and Kingswood. 70 TO BROTHERS AND SISTER mand of God. But if any man, bishop or other, ordain that I shall not do what God commands me to do, to submit to that ordinance would be to obey man rather than God. And to do this, I have both an ordinary call and an extraordinary. My ordinary call is, my ordination by the bishop, ' Take thou authority to preach the word of God.' My extraordinary call is witnessed by the works God doeth by my ministry : which prove that He is with me of a truth in this exercise of my office. Perhaps this might be better expressed in another way: God bears witness in an extraordinary manner, that my thus exercising my ordinary call is well pleasing in His sight. But what if a bishop forbids this ? I do not say as St. Cyprian, Populus a scelerato antistite separare se debet.1 But I say, God being my helper, I will obey Him still : and if I suffer for it, His will be done. Adieu ! ' I glean after Whitefield. . . . I dare in no wise join the Moravians.' Here is an important letter to Charles Wesley, from a copy in the Colman Collection, now given with significant additions to it not before published.2 I t shows the critical condition of Wesley's work in London, some features of its early organisation, his resistance of the clericalism of his brother Charles above referred to, and the separateness of their teaching and work from that of Whitefield, and also that of the Moravians.3 Charles Wesley endorsed this letter, ' when I incline to the Germans,' i.e. the Moravians. Wesley was busy in London, knitting together his societies 1 ' I t is the duty of the people to separate themselves from a wicked bishop.' 2 Compare Wesley5s/ournaZ, vol. ii. p. 448. 3 See Journal^ vol. ii. p. 307-500, and Mr. Curnock's illuminating summaries, for the facts of this intricate period. 71 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS which had been rent by secessions to Whitefield and Calvinism. He wants to set them singing his brother's hymns, which so clearly taught God's love to all— e Father whose everlasting love Thy only Son for sinners gave, Whose grace to all did freely move, And sent Him down a world to save.'l And Wesley needed the help of gifted and popular Thomas Maxfield, whom Charles Wesley wished to hinder. Eighteen months earlier than this letter Wesley, on his return to London after a preaching tour, had himself been shocked on finding that Maxfield, a layman, had ' turned preacher.' He had appointed him in his absence to tend the London Methodists at the Foundery and to help in informal services. Maxfield had been drawn on by the manifest acceptance and usefulness of his expositions. This, and the memorable reply of Wesley's mother, then resident at the Foundery, at this critical stage of the work completely carried Wesley's judgement, and Maxfield was allowed to preach. Mrs. Wesley said, 'John, you know what my sentiments have been. You cannot suspect me of favouring readily anything of this kind. But take care what you do with respect to that young man, for he is as surely called of God to preach as you are. Examine what have been the fruits of his preaching, and hear him also yourself.' Wesley had previously permitted John Cennick, a surveyor and schoolmaster, to preach; but this was at remote, neglected Kingswood, near Bristol. Reference is made later to Wesley's separation from Whitefield, and anything which savoured of Calvinism.2 The Wesleys had already drawn away from the Moravians. As shown, in letters just given and in others, 3 they owed them and their system an incalculable debt for inspiration and pattern. But the Wesleys and their followers had been compelled to separate from the Moravians of Fetter 1 Verse I in this booklet of seventeen hymns, then so significant in their restatement of Scripture teaching. The italics are as in the original. 2 3 See p. 102. See p. 95. 72 TO BROTHERS AND SISTER Lane, London, in July 1740, because of heresies which some had introduced there. Wesley declares that these are still present. Nowers was a leading Moravian. Note the pointed appeal, mingled of affection, pathos, and satire, which Wesley makes to his brother in the last paragraph of this significant letter, and also the solemn appeal which he makes to the Head of the Church. Six days later he had to write a farewell letter 1 to Joseph Humphreys, his first Moravian lay helper, who now followed Whitefield. To him also Wesley's first Methodist lay preacher, John Cennick, had gone—< to the right h a n d ' ; while the Rev. Westley Hall and now his brother Charles were going 4 to the left,'—Moravianism. To his Brother Charles, LONDON, April 2 1 , 1741. It is not possible for me to set out yet. I must go round, and glean after Gfeorge] W[hitefield]. I will take care of the books you mention. My Journal is not written yet. The bands and society are my first care. The bands are purged ; the society is purging, and we continually feel Whose hand is in the work. Send the new printed Hymns 2 immediately. We presented a thousand of Barclay 3 to G[eorge] Wfhitefieldjs congregation on Sunday. On Sunday next I purpose to distribute a thousand more at the Foundery. I am settling a regular method of visiting the sick here. Eight or ten have offered themselves for the work—who are like to have full employment; for more and more are taken ill every day. Our Lord will thoroughly purge His floor. I rejoice in your speaking your mind freely. O let our 1 2 See p . 2 2 1 . Hymns on God's Everlasting Love, To which is added the Cry of a Reprobate, and the Horrible Decree.—Hymns by Charles Wesley, just printed in Bristol. 3 A tract, Serious Considerations on Absolute Predestination. 73 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS love be without dissimulation ! But I can't yet agree with you in all points. Who is your informer concerning . . . N . . . , Bath ? I doubt the facts. Have you had them face to face ? Brother Nowers is not . . .* Ask him about them. Let the premisses be but proved; and I greatly commend the conclusion. I am not clear that Brother Maxfield should not expound at Greyhound Lane ; nor can I as yet do without him. Our clergymen have miscarried full as much as the laymen ; and that the Moravians are other than laymen, I know not. As yet I dare in no wise join with the Moravians. 1. Because their whole scheme is mystical, not scriptural, refined in every point above what is written—immeasurably beyond the plain doctrine of the Gospel. 2. Because there is darkness and closeness in all their behaviour, and guile in almost all their words. 8. Because they not only do not practise, but utterly despise every self-denial and the daily cross. 4. Because they, upon principle, conform to the world, in wearing gold and gay or costly apparel. 5. Because they extend Christian liberty in this and many other respects beyond what is warranted by Holy Writ. 6. Because they are by no means zealous of good works, or at least only to their own people; and, lastly, because they make inward religion swallow up outward in general. For these reasons (chiefly) I will rather, God being my helper, stand quite alone, than join with them ; I mean till I have full assurance that they will spread none of these errors among the little flock committed to my charge. O my Brother, my soul is grieved for you. The poison is in you. Fair words have stolen away your heart. I fear you can't now find any at Bristol in so great liberty as Marshall. 2 No English man or woman is like the 1 2 74 In love with her. (This is written in Byrom's shorthand.) A leading London Moravian. TO BROTHERS AND SISTER Moravians! So the matter is come to a fair issue. Five of us did still stand together a few months since. But two are gone to the right hand (poor H[umphre]ys 1 and Sennick),2 and two more to the left (Mr. H a l l 3 and you). Lord, if it be Thy Gospel which I preach, Arise and maintain Thine own cause ! ' I give you a Dilemma.' The work was spreading on all hands. Its direction by one mind was a necessity at this stage. Meanwhile the claims of his family were increasing upon Charles Wesley. He now confined his labours to London and Bristol, and four years later he ceased to itinerate. Wesley was near the most dangerous illness of his life. It passed, and so did this dilemma. He and his brother had thirtyfive more years of triumphant united work. To his brother Charles. LONDON, October 20, 1753. came back from Bedford last night. I know not whether it was your will or no (I believe not), but I am sure it was God's will for you to call there. How do you judge whether a thing be God's will or no ? I hope not by inward impressions. Let us walk warily. I have much constitutional enthusiasm ; and you have much more. I give you a dilemma. Take one side or the other. Either act really in connexion with me, or never pretend to it. Rather disclaim it, and openly avow you do not, and will not. By acting in connexion with me, I mean take counsel with me once or twice a year as to the places where you will labour. Hear my advice before you fix whether you take it or no. A t present you are so far from this that I do not DEAR BROTHER,—I 1 3 2 See p. 221. See p. 103. Hall was * by turns pious and profligate, a sad specimen of humanity.' He married Wesley's sister Martha. 75 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS even know when and where you intend to go, so far are you from following any advice of mine; nay, even from asking it. And yet I may say, without vanity, that I am a better judge in this matter than either Lady Huntingdon, Sally,1 Jones, 2 or any other; nay, than your own heart; that is, will. I wish you all peace, zeal, and love. ' Here is Charles Perronet raving . . . and Charles Wesley . . . and I in the midst, staring.5 It was Wesley's design to revive the Church of England by forming his Methodist societies within it. This was hindered by the Church leaders and their persecution of the Methodists, and by the unwillingness of an ever growing number of Methodists to join the Church. To keep his followers from avowedly separating from the Church, and to justify their slight use of its services, became Wesley's anxious, incessant task. 3 This matter was also the chief cause of trouble between him and his brother Charles. I t had been largely and sharply discussed at the annual Conference—the twelfth, at Leeds, a month earlier. Sixty-three preachers were present—twelve of them 'half-itinerants, 1 fifteen 'our chief local preachers."' On the ground of expediency, the decision was reached which Wesley gives below. The question of the administration of the Lord's Supper by preachers who had not been ordained had emerged in Ireland, where Thomas Walsh was the chief. Charles Perronet and his brother Edward, like their father, the Rev. Vincent Perronet, vicar of Shoreham, helped Wesley. This was a crisis in the evolution of Methodism. Wesley's calmness and firmness were invaluable. The questions between the brothers remained unanswered. They were not fully answered until after Wesley's death. In the last letter to Charles, given in this series (page 90), Wesley states his position. 1 2 76 Charles Wesley's wife. Dr. John Jones. 3 See p. 133. TO BROTHERS AND SISTER To his brother Charles. LONDON, June 20, 1755. DEAR BROTHER,—Do not you understand that they all promised by Thomas Walsh not to administer, even among themselves ? I think that an huge point given up ; perhaps more than they could give up with a clear conscience. They ' showed an excellent spirit' in this very thing. Likewise when I (not to say you) spoke once and again, spoke satis pro imperio,1 when I reflected on their answers, I admired their spirit, and was ashamed of my own. The practical conclusion was, ' Not to separate from the Church.' Did we not all agree in this ? Surely either you or I must have been asleep, or we could not differ so widely in a matter of fact! Here is Charles Perronet raving ' because his friends have given up all'; and Charles Wesley, ' because they have given up nothing'; and I in the midst, staring and wondering both at one and the other. I do not want to do anything more, unless I could bring them over to my opinion ; and I am not in haste for that. I have no time to write anything more till I have finished the Notes.2 Nor am I in haste. I stand open to the light. Let it be worded anyway. I will give ten pounds 3 between this and Christmas. This I think I can do, though I am just now saddled with Suky Hare, 4 to pay for her board as well as learning her trade. Why do you not send for the boy to Bristol ? I do not object. If Mr. Lampe's tunes are in print already, it is enough. I wish you had told me this six months ago, and the rest 1 6 With sufficient authority.' 2 His famous Notes on the New 3 Testament. Most probably for the education of ' t h e boy,' Wesley Hall, their nephew. 4 A relation of the Wesleys. 77 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS (which only we want) should have been printed before now. Pray send them by Michael Fenwick to me here. He will be in Bristol next week. Cyprian is a terrible witness of the then Church, for he speaks it not as his own private sense, but an incontestable allowed rule. And by antistes there, I really believe he means the minister of a parish. That pinches me. Nevertheless, I think with you till I see more light, though I should be hard set to defend myself against a skilful adversary. When I am convinced it is my duty, I will follow Cyprian's advice. The same say you, and no more. I do not fluctuate y e t ; but I cannot answer the arguments on that side the question. Joseph Cownley says, ' For such and such reasons I dare not hear a drunkard preach, or read prayers.' I answer, i I dare.' But I cannot answer his reasons. I can stay here four or five weeks, then I purpose for Cornwall. Can you come hither when I go ? My love to my sister.1 Adieu ! 'God's dealings with us have been extraordinary.' To his brother Charles. PLYMOUTH DOCK, September 28,, 1760. DEAR, BROTHER,—I have no objection to the bestowing another reading upon Mr. Law's letters. 2 But I think I have answered them quantum sufficit by the letter in Lloyd'*s Evening Post; only, if need be, it may be inserted in some of the monthly magazines. Since I wrote that letter I have procured (which I could not before) the < Address to the 1 2 I.e., sister-in-law, Mrs. Charles Wesley, her husband's * faithful Sally.' The Rev. William Law, M.A., author of the Serious Call,, to which work Wesley was deeply indebted at one stage. He had censured Wesley for his condemnation of the Mystics. 78 TO BROTHERS AND SISTER Clergy." It is amazing ! Nothing is more plain than that he has never read it. I doubt whether he ever saw it. I care not a rush for ordinary means, only that it is our duty to try them. All our lives, and all God's dealings with us, have been extraordinary from the beginning. We have all reason, therefore, to expect that what has been will be again. I have been preternaturally restored more than ten times. I suppose you will be thus restored for the journey ; and that by the journey, as a natural means, your health will be re-established, provided you determine to spend all the strength which God shall give you to His work. Cornwall has suffered miserably by my long absence, and the unfaithfulness of the preachers. I left seventeen hundred in the societies, and I find twelve hundred. If possible, you should see Mr. Walker. 1 He has been near a month at the Hot-Wells [Bristol]. He is absolutely a Scot in his opinions, but of an excellent spirit. Mr. Stonehouse's horse performs to a miracle. He is considerably better than when I had him. On Friday evening (if nothing extraordinary occur) I hope to be at Bristol between five and six. Probably I shall leave Shepton Mallet at two. My love to Sally. If John Fisher is at Bristol, pray desire him to send. what Thomas Seccomb left (with an account) for his poor mother. Adieu ! 'Quack Medicine' Hymns.' and ' Namby-pambical Wesley was often physician as well as divine. His book, Primitive Physic, was primitive, old-fashioned, and largely empirical. It was a well-meant effort, as the preface says— 1 Rev. Samuel Walker of Truro. He formed * conversation classes,' but condemned Methodist class-meetings, and dreaded separation from the Church. 79 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS ' Without obliging or disobliging any man living, a mean hand has made here some little attempt towards a plain and easy way of curing most diseases.'' He now urges the use of electricity. He was one of the first public men to show interest in Franklin's startling discovery, and gave a clever summary of it to his people in his Journal (February 17, 1753). He set up apparatus at several centres in London, ' that any that desired it may try the virtue of this surprising medicine.'' He stirs his brother to more hymn-writing, but not of 6 namby-pambical' hymns. 1 These Wesley hated ; and he resented the handling and mangling of his brother's and his own hymns. Brother Sheen and all must note that. In his famous sharp preface to his Collection of Hymns for the Methodists (1780), he welcomed any to use the hymns, ' provided they print them just as they are; but I desire they would not attempt to mend them, for they really are not able. None of them is able to mend either the sense or the verse. Therefore I must beg of them one of these two favours ; either to let them stand just as they are, to take them for better, for worse ; or to add the true reading in the margin, or at the bottom of the page, that we may no longer be accountable either for the nonsense or for the doggerel of other men.2 To his brother* Charles. LONDON, December 26, 1761. DEAR BROTHER,—Spend as many hours in the congregation as you can. But exercise alone will strengthen your lungs; or electrifying, which I wonder you did not try long ago. Never start at its being a quack medicine. I desire no other; particularly since I was so nearly murdered by being cured of my ague secundum artem? You 1 See above, p. 67. One hundred and fifty-four alterations and various readings have been traced in the forms given by hymn-menders to the lines of Charles Wesley's hymn, ' Jesu, lover of my soul.' 3 ' According to the rules of art.' 2 80 TO BROTHERS AND SISTER should always (and I hope you do) write standing and sloping. We are always in danger of enthusiasm; but I think no more now than any time these twenty years. The word of God runs indeed; and loving faith spreads on every side. Do not take my word, or any one else's, but come and see. It is good to be in London now. I t is impossible for me to correct my own books. I sometimes think it strange that I have not one preacher that will and can. I think every one of them owes me so much service. Pray tell R. Sheen I am hugely displeased at his reprinting the Nativity Hymns and omitting the very best hymn in the collection—; All glory to God in the sky,' etc. I beg they may never more be printed without it. Omit one or two, and I will thank you. They are narribypambical. I wish you would give us one or two invitatory hymns. We want such exceedingly. My love to Sally. My wife gains ground. Adieu ! ' There is need of a Lady's Hand as well as a Lion's H e a r t ' Indeed there was. All the five persons named here involved Wesley in anxiety. Happily, he and his brother Charles stood together in their treatment of them, although Charles was inclined to move impetuously. Wesley knew that some troubles settle themselves if left alone. Maxfield and Bell were not of this sort. The former was among Wesley's first and ablest lay-preachers. He was ordained by the Bishop of Derry, so that ' t h a t good man (Wesley) might not work himself to death.' Charles Wesley thought him the ' stubbornest, proudest of men.' He caused serious division among the London Methodists, and took some with him when he separated from Wesley in the next year. Bell disturbed them by his wild enthusiasm, pretensions to F 81 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS superhuman saintliness, and prophecies of the end of the world. 'But I go on my way,' says Wesley. 'This year,' he wrote later, ' from the beginning to the end, was a year never to be forgotten. Such a season I never saw before. Such a multitude of sinners were converted, in all parts of England and Ireland, and so many were filled with pure love.' To his brother Charles. LONDON^ January 5, 1762. take me right. I am far from pronouncing my remarks ex cathedra. I only desire they may be fairly considered. I was a little surprised to find Bishop Warburton 1 so entirely unacquainted with the New Testament: and, notwithstanding all his parade of learning, I believe he is no critic in Greek. If Thomas Maxfield continues as he is, it is impossible that he should continue long with us. But I live in hope of better things. Meantime, festina lente !2 I baptized two Turks two or three weeks ago. They seem to be strong in faith, and their story is very probable; but I am not sure it is true. I wait for further evidence. This week I have begun to speak my mind concerning five or six honest enthusiasts. But I move only a hair'sbreadth at a time; and by this means we come nearer and nearer to each other. No sharpness will profit. There is need of a lady's hand as well as a lion's heart. Mr. Whitefield 3 has fallen upon me in public openmouthed, and only not named my name. So has Mr. Madan. But let them look to it. I go on my way. I DEAR BROTHER,—You 1 2 3 82 See above, p. 36 and below, p. 124. ' Haste onwards with caution.' See below, p. 103. TO BROTHERS AND SISTER have a sufficient answer as to George Bell; but I will not give it before the time. We join in love to you both. My wife gains ground. Adieu! ' 1 was thinking on Christian Perfection/ A valuable letter of definitions, distinctions, and affirmations. I t summarises Wesley's Plain Account of this characteristic Methodist doctrine. He thought he saw at this period five hundred witnesses to the truth of it. Charles Wesley held another view—that saintliness, the fulness of Christian life and power, is attained by struggle and discipline rather than as ' an act of faith in the mercy, truth, and power of God.'* He expressed this in his two volumes of Short Hymns on Select Passages of Holy Scripture, These appeared in 1762 and drew this letter. To his brother Charles, Circa 1762. thoughts occurred to my mind this morning which I believe it may be useful to set down, the rather because it may be a means of our understanding each other clearly ; that we may agree as far as ever we can, and then let all the world know it. I was thinking on Christian perfection with regard to the thing, the manner, and the time. 1. By perfection I mean the humble, gentle, patient love of God and man, ruling all the tempers, words, and actions : the whole heart and the whole life. I do not include an impossibility of falling from it, either in part or in whole. Therefore I retract several expressions in our hymns which partly express, partly imply, such an impossibility. And I do nob contend for the term sinless, though I do not object against it. DEAR BROTHER,—Some 1 Life by Jackson, vol. ii. chap. xxii. 83 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Do we agree or differ here ? If we differ, wherein ? % As to t h e manner, I believe this perfection is always wrought in t h e soul by faith, by a simple act of faith ; consequently, in an instant. B u t I believe a g r a d u a l work, b o t h preceding and following t h a t instant. D o we agree or differ here ? 3. As to t h e time, I believe this instant generally is t h e i n s t a n t of death, the moment before t h e soul leaves t h e body. B u t I believe it may be ten, twenty, or forty years before death. D o we agree or differ here ? I believe it is usually many years after justification ; b u t t h a t it may be within five years, or five months, after it. I know no conclusive argument t o t h e contrary. D o you ? If it must be many years after justification, I would be glad t o know how many. Pretium quotus arrogat annus ?1 A n d how many days, or m o n t h s , or even years, can you allow t o be between perfection and death ? H o w far from justification must it be ? and how near t o d e a t h ? If it be possible, let you and me come t o a good understanding, b o t h for our own sakes and for t h e sake of t h e people. ' Come let us arise and shake ourselves.5 H e r e is a leader indeed, and of a t r u t h humble, selfdevoted, insistent. ' W e must, we m u s t ! ' Deborah would have sung again, e For that the leaders took the lead in Israel^ Bless ye the Lord' ; and Chaucer's commendation was earned— c Christ's lore,, and His apostles twelve He taught; hut first he followed it himself/ 1 84 What year would be good enough ? TO BROTHERS AND SISTER Then the demand and command is passed from these captains to the rank and file, as shown in the letter which follows this. To Ms brother Charles. LEWISHAM_, February 28, 1766. DEAR BKOTHER,—We must, we must, you and I at least, be all-devoted to God ! Then wives, and sons, and daughters, and everything else will be real, invaluable blessings. Eia age^ rumpe moras! * Let us this day use all the power we have ! If we have enough, well; if not, let us this day expect a fresh supply. How long shall we drag on thus heavily, though God has called us to be the chief conductors of such a work ? Alas ! what conductors ! If I am (in some sense) the head, and you the heart, of the work, may it not be said, ' T h e whole head is sick, and the whole heart is faint' ? Come, in the name of God, let us arise and shake ourselves from the dust! Let us strengthen each other's hands in God, and that without delay. Have series sexagenarii2 (who would have thought we should live to be such !) time to lose ? Let you and I, and our house, serve the Lord in good earnest. May His peace rest on you and yours! I desire all the Society to meet me on Tuesday evening (March 11), after preaching. Adieu ! ' Concerning the Work of God in these Kingdoms.' To his brother Charles. ATHLONE, June 21, 1767. some time I have had many thoughts concerning the work of God in these kingdoms. I have been surprised that it has spread so far, and that it DEAR 1 2 BROTHER,—For Virgil's line : 'Come, bestir yourself, and lay aside delay.' ' Old men that have attained to their sixtieth year.' 85 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS has spread no farther. And what hindered ? Surely the design of God was to ' bow a nation to His sway , : instead of which, there is still only a Christian here and there, and the rest are yet in the shadow of death; although those who would profit by us have need to make haste, as we are not likely to serve them long. What, indeed, has hindered? I want to consider this. And must we not first say, Nos Consules ? 1 If we were more holy in heart and life, thoroughly devoted to God, would not all the preachers catch our fire and carry it with them throughout the land ? Is not the next hindrance the littleness of grace (rather than of gifts) in a considerable part of our preachers ? They have not the whole mind that was in Christ; they do not steadily walk as He walked. And therefore the hand of the Lord is stayed; though not altogether; though He does work still. But it is not in such a degree as He surely would, were they holy as He that hath sent them is holy. Is not the third hindrance the littleness of grace in the generality of the people ? Therefore they pray little, and with little fervency, for a general blessing; and therefore their prayer has little power with God. I t does not, as once, shut and open heaven. Add to this, that as there is much of the spirit of the world in their hearts, so there is much conformity to the world in their lives. They ought to be both burning and shining lights; but they neither burn nor shine. They are not true to the rules they profess to observe; they are not holy in all manner of conversation. Nay, many of them are salt that has lost its savour; the little savour they once had. Wherewith, then, shall the rest of the land be seasoned ? What wonder that their neighbours are as unholy as ever ? But what can be done to remedy this ? I wish you would 1 86 * We who aie the chiefs.' TO BROTHERS AND SISTER give an attentive reading to the minutes of the last Conference, and see if it will not be worth our while to enforce them with all our might. We have weight enough, and can enforce them. I know not who can and will when we are gone. Let us now fix things on as firm a foundation as possible, and not depend upon seeing another Conference. Richard Burke, John Dillon, and one or two more in this kingdom, are truly devoted men; so are a few of the preachers in England. Si sic omnes!1 What would be able to stand against them ? How go you on in London ? How is Mr. Whitefield, and my Lady, 2 and Mr. Madan, and Romaine, and Berridge ? Do you converse with those that are most alive, and sparingly and warily with them that are dead while they live ? I hope Sally and your young ones are well. O what a work is it to train up children for heaven ! Peace be with you and yours ! * A Son, Father, Grandfather preaching the genuine Gospel.5 Wesley hoped t h a t ' one of the three' of Charles Wesley's boys might be a minister. John James, whose birth was the occasion of this reference, died in infancy; two, Charles and Samuel, were gifted musicians.3 The Wesleys were rightly proud of their ancestry.4 The Rev. John White was the Patriarch of Dorchester (1605). He saw the possibilities of the Dorset traders' venture in North America, and helped to make a refuge there, in Massachusetts, for the Pilgrim Fathers. 6 1 * O that the rest were like-minded.' Lady Huntingdon. See chapter xi. 4 See above, p. 12. 5 Cambridge Modern History', vol. vii. p. 15, and The United States, by Chancellor and Hewes, vol. i. pp. 216-19. 2 3 87 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS To his brother Charles. LONDON, January 15, 1768. DEAR BROTHER,—Six or seven hundred pounds is brought to a conference, of which five hundred at least pays the debt. 1 Then extraordinary demands are answered. How much remains for law ? I am now near three hundred pounds out of pocket, which I borrowed to pay Mr. Pardon. When I receive some more from Newcastle, I will send it to Bristol; probably very soon. I t is highly probable one of the three will stand before the Lord. But, so far as I can learn, such a thing has scarce been for these thousand years before, as a son, father, grandfather, atavus, tritavus, preaching the gospel, nay, and the genuine gospel, in a line. You know Mr. White, sometime Chairman of the Assembly of Divines, was my grandmother's father. Look upon our little ones at Kingswood as often as you can. A word from you will be a quickening to them. O how many talents we are entrusted with ! ' B u t what account can thy bad steward make?*1 Indeed we have need to gird up the loins of our mind, and run faster the small remainder of our race. * One thing !' Let us mind one thing only; and nothing, great or small, but as it ministers to it. Peace be with you and yours ! Adieu. * I have neither Leisure nor Inclination to write a Book.' Here is Wesley's method by which he gave so many books to his followers and the world.2 His brother urged him to 1 2 88 The debt on chapels in the Connexion. See above, p. 7. TO BROTHERS AND SISTER write a book on Young's Night Thoughts. He cannot be drawn to that, nor to hear Handel's music, in which Charles was now deeply interested, because of his son Charles, a musical prodigy. The last line of this letter hints that his wife 1 has deserted him. Was she at Newcastle ? To his brother Charles. LONDON, December 17, 1768. thank you for your reproof. There is reason in what you say. If there was not evil, there was the appearance of evil. Matters have not been well carried on at Liverpool; but ' what cannot be cured must be endured.' Why, you simpleton, you are cutting me out a month's work. Nay, but I have neither leisure nor inclination to write a book. I intend only: 1. to leave out what I most dislike; 2. to mark what I most approve of; 3. to prefix a short preface; and I shall run the hazard of printing it in Bristol. There you yourself can read the proof-sheets. You do well with regard to my sister Emily. W h a t farther is wanting I will supply. I hear nothing from or of our friend at Newcastle. I have no time for Handel or Avison now. Peace be with you and yours. Adieu! I am now a mere Fellow of a College again. DEAR BROTHER,—I ' I firmly believe I am a Scriptural Bishop as much as any Man in England.' Words from this letter have sounded out all over the world. Two years before his brother's death Wesley published it in his Arminian Magazine (1786) with the heading, ' On the Church: in a Letter tt> the Rev. .' The omitted name was that of his brother Charles.2 It gives 1 See below, p. 356. 2 See his Life by Jackson, vol. ii. p. 394. 89 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Wesley's final judgement on his own attitude towards the Church of England. ' I do not separate . . . I vary/ He names some, not all, the features in which he varied from it. The Rules for the Methodists had always left them free in this matter. His brother Charles declared that Wesley separated from the Church, and in his reply to this letter refers to a ' fatal step at Bristol.' This was taken in 1784, and was the ordination there, at 6 Dighton Street, by Wesley, who was only a presbyter, of some of his preachers. Wesley says that he had never exercised in England the right which he had to ordain. He means for England. The preachers he ordained, as just stated, were for America. Later, he ordained others for Scotland; then for England. In all, twenty-seven of his preachers were so set apart by him. ' Ordination is separation' from the Church of England, was the legal dictum of Lord Mansfield on Wesley's act, since it was that of a presbyter only. In that year also Wesley constituted his Conference, giving it control of his preachers and chapels. What more could he do to indicate separation ? Charles Wesley disowned his bitter juvenile line here quoted as to ' heathenish priests'; his brother was compelled to say it was 6 a sad truth. I see fifty times more of England than you do ; and I find few exceptions to it.' Wesley's assertions of his adherence to the Church, attendance at it, and commands that his followers should not leave it, were largely nullified by his declaration here, as often, that he would do what ' I believe meet, right, and my bounden duty, Church or no Church ' ; and more by his actions. These decided the course of Methodism. In 1788 he wrote: * A kind of separation has already taken place, and will inevitably spread, though by slow degrees.' To his brother Charles. PLYMOUTH DOCK, August 19, 1785. REV. SIR,—I will tell you my thoughts with all simplicity, and wait for better information. If you agree with me, 90 TO BROTHERS AND SISTER well; if not, we can (as Mr. Whitefield used to say) agree to disagree. For these forty years I have been in doubt concerning the question : What obedience is due to ( Heathenish priests and mitred infidels ?' I have from time to time proposed my doubts to the most pious and sensible clergymen I knew. But they gave me no satisfaction; rather they seemed to be puzzled as well as I. Some obedience I always paid to the bishops, in obedience to the laws of the land. But I cannot see that I am under any obligation to obey them farther than those laws require. I t is in obedience to those laws that I have never exercised in England the power which I believe God has given me. I firmly believe I am a scriptural eirCcr/coiro? as much as any man in England or Europe. (For the uninterrupted succession I know to be a fable, which no man ever did or can prove.) But this does in nowise interfere with my remaining in the Church of England; from which I have no more desire to separate than I had fifty years ago. I still attend all the ordinances of the Church, at all opportunities, and I constantly and earnestly desire all that are connected with me to do so. When Mr. Smyth pressed us to ' separate from the Church," he meant,' Go to Church no more/ And this was what I meant seven-and-twenty years ago when I persuaded our brethren (Not to separate from the Church.'' But here another question occurs,' What is the Church of E n g l a n d ? ' I t is not 'all the people of England.' Papists and Dissenters are no part thereof. It is not all the people of England except Papists and Dissenters. Then we should have a glorious Church indeed! No ; according to our Twentieth Article, a particular Church is ' a congregation of faithful people' (coeius credentium, the 91 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS words in our Latin edition) ' among whom the word of God is preached, and the sacraments duly administered/ Here is a true logical definition, containing both the essence and the properties of the Church. What then, according to this definition, is the Church of England ? Does it mean, ' All the believers in England (except the Papists and Dissenters) who have the word of God and the sacraments duly administered among them ?' I fear this does not come up to your idea of ' the Church of England/ Well, what more do you include in that phrase ? ' Why, all the believers that adhere to the doctrine and discipline established by the Convocation under Queen Elizabeth/ Nay, that discipline is wellnigh vanished away, and the doctrine both you and I adhere to. All those reasons against a separation from the Church in this sense, I subscribe to still. What then are you frighted at ? I no more separate from it now than I did in the year 1758. I submit still (though sometimes with a doubting conscience) to mitred infidels. I do indeed vary from them in some points of doctrine, and in some points of discipline; by preaching abroad, for instance, by praying extempore, and by forming societies ; but not a hair's-breadth further than I believe to be meet, right, and my bounden duty. I walk still by the same rule I have done for between forty and fifty years. I do nothing rashly. I t is not likely I should. The high-day of my blood is over. If you will go hand in hand with me, do. But do not hinder me if you will not help. Perhaps if you had kept close to me I might have done better. However, with or without help, I creep on. And as I have been hitherto, so I trust I shall always be, Your affectionate friend and brother. 92 C H A P T E R IV CONCERNING THE METHODISTS AND METHODISM T H E letters now given show us Wesley as he builds Methodism. At his death there were 120,188 Methodist members with 511 ministers; of these, 48,165 members with 193 ministers were in America arid Canada. 1 ' If this Work be of God . . . who shall overthrow it ?' * The .'rise of the United Society' of Methodists, says Wesley, was ' first in' London in the latter end of 1739, and then in other places.' 2 There were Methodists and Methodist societies before they were united in one connexion, under one leader and the same Rules. 3 One such society met in Fetter Lane, London. Of this, Wesley was a member. This letter shows us the emergence of another such society at Bristol in this memorable year of Methodist origins. Wesley usually wrote to his ' Brethren at Fetter Lane' on Monday, as here, and gave them a day by day, sometimes almost hour by hour, account of his experience and his doings. The letters were addressed ' To Mr. James Hutton, Bookseller, near Temple Bar, London.' He was 1 The statistics of world-wide Methodism in 1913 were:—ministers, '54,658; lay-preachers, 105,384; Church members and probationers, 9,228,385; Sunday-schools, 88,384; officers and teachers, 865,838; Sunday scholars, 7,991,037; churches, etc., 100,916; members and adherents estimated, 32,728,000. 2 A New History of Methodism,\vol. ii. Appendix D. 3 Green, in his John Wesley', Evangelist\ traces these and the merging of them in the United Society, pp. 291 ; cf. 190, 192. 93 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Wesley's friend, ' Dear Jemmy,' and a prominent Moravian. This deeply interesting and vivid letter adds much to the account of these events given by Wesley in his Journal, and has not hitherto appeared in complete permanent form. In it the evolution of new religious organisms goes forward before our eyes. Whitefield has been in Bristol. His burning enthusiasm and fervid Christian oratory, and his open-air preaching among the colliers of Kingswood, has searched and stirred many. They must be drawn into Christian fellowship. The Church of England wants them not, indeed shuts them out of her buildings. Whitefield must leave the city to range further on his errands of mercy. He calls Wesley to take his place.1 Not even Whitefield's vigorous imagination prefigured the results which were to follow the response. Under the brooding Spirit of God, as Wesley takes up the task, life and form and features appear which will be reproduced a thousand times in city, town, village, and hamlet, in cottage homes and the green fields. Here is the incessant toil of a lover of souls who hastes with quick-springing sustained interest from duty to duty; here the abundant use of, and constant appeal to, the Bible and the Bible only; and here the offering of the good news of God's love, as on the hillsides of Galilee, wherever the people can be gathered, and it is free for all. On this Monday, April % Wesley conducts his first open-air service in England. Vast crowds eagerly listen. Christian people look on the sight with wonder. Presbyterians, Anabaptists, a minister, soldiers, and several of the rich are there. They that fear the Lord, women and men, draw together in groups and bands that they may speak often one to another. Some declare aloud what God has done for their souls. We see the beginnings of Methodist fellowship—its bands and class-meetings. The criminals and the poor in Newgate, the prison of the city, are visited. Tears course down the cheeks of grimy colliers at Kingswood and Hanham, and 1 Wesley lodged at the house of Whitefield's sister, Mrs. Grevil, named in letter, in Wine Street—the Winch Street. 94 CONCERNING METHODISM their natures are renewed. The trees are clapping their hands, and the little hills are rejoicing on every side. c Break forth into singing, Ye trees of the wood, For Jesus is bringing Lost sinners to God/ This is a great week in the history of England and of Christianity. To the Brethren at Fetter Lane, London, by Mr, James Hutton. BRISTOL, April 9, 1739. MY DEAR BRETHREN,—On Sunday evening, the 1st instant, I began to expound, at Nicholas Street Society, our Lord's Sermon on the Mount. The room, passage, and staircase were filled with attentive hearers. On Monday I talked with several in private to try what manner of spirit they were of; and at 4 in the afternoon went to a brickyard adjoining bo the city, 1 where I had an opportunity of preaching the Gospel of the kingdom (from a little eminence) to 3000 or 4000 people. The Scripture on which I spoke was this, ' The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because He hath anointed me to preach the Gospel to the poor; He hath sent me to heal the broken-hearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, to preach the acceptable year of the Lord.*' At 7 I began expounding the Acts of the Apostles to the society in Baldwin Street. We had more company than the room would hold, and the power of our Lord was with us. On Tuesday, the 3rd, I began preaching at Newgate (as I continue to do every morning) on the Gospel of St. John. 1 This and other historic Methodist sites in Bristol and Kingswood, and the significant events of these days, are traced in my Wesley and Kingswood. 95 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Many Presbyterians and Anabaptists came to hear. Afterwards I transcribed some of the Rules of our Society for the use of our (future) brethren here. In the evening I expounded on ; Blessed are they that mourn,' at Nicholas Street Society. I hope God spake to the hearts of many there. The next day the audience increased at Newgate. At 4 in the afternoon I offered the free grace of God from those words, ' I will heal their backsliding, I will love them freely,' to about 1500 in a plain near Baptist Mills, a sort of suburb or village not far from Bristol, where many, if not most, of the inhabitants are Papists. 0 may they effectually lay hold on the one Mediator, between God and man, Christ Jesus! About 7 in the evening, three women, who desire only to know Jesus Christ and Him crucified—Mrs. Norman, Mrs. Grevil, and Mrs. Panou—agreed to meet together once a week to confess their faults to one another, and pray one for another, that they may be healed. And Mrs. Panou desired she might propose their design to her two sisters, and offer them the liberty of joining with them. At 8, Samuel Wathen, surgeon, Richard Cross, upholsterer, Charles Bonner, distiller, and Thomas Westal, carpenter, met and agreed to do the same; who also desired they might make the offer of joining with them to three or four of their acquaintance. If this work be not of God, let it come to nought. If it be, who shall overthrow it ? On Thursday, at 5 in the evening, I began the Epistle to the Romans, at a society in Castle Street, where, after the expounding, a poor man gave glory to God by openly confessing the things he had done. About 8 a young woman of Nicholas Street Society sank down as one dead. We prayed for her, and she soon revived, and went home strengthened and comforted both in body and in spirit. 96 CONCERNING METHODISM A Presbyterian minister was with us at Newgate on Friday and Saturday. On Friday evening we were at a society without Lawford's Gate, where, the yard being full as well as the house, I expounded part of the first chapter of the first Epistle of St. John at the window. On Saturday evening Weavers' Hall was quite full. A soldier was present at the preaching on Monday, two at the expounding on several of the following days, and five or six this evening. I declared to them all that they were damned sinners; but the Gospel was the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth. Beginning at 7 (an hour earlier than usual) at the Bowling Green (which is in the heart of the city) yesterday morning, there were not, I believe, above 1000 or 1200 persons present. And the day being very cold and stormy (beside that much rain had fallen in the night), many who designed it were hindered from going to Hanham Mount, which is at least 4 miles distant from the town. Between 10 and 11 I began preaching the Gospel there in a meadow on the top of the hill. Five or 600 people from Bristol (of whom several were Quakers) were there, and (I imagine) about 1000 of the colliers. I called to them in the words of Isaiah, ' Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money. Come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price.' On Rose Green (which is a plain upon the top of a high hill) are several small hills, where the old coalpits were. On the edge of one of these I stood in the afternoon, and cried in the name of my Master, ' If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink. He that believeth on me' (as the Scriptures have said) ' out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.' About 5000 were present, many of whom received the word gladly, and all with deep attention. G 97 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS From thence we went to the society in Baldwin Street; whose room, containing but a small part of the company, we opened the doors and windows, by which means all that was spoken of the true Christian life, described in the end of the 2nd chapter of the Acts, was heard clearly by those in the next room, and on the leads, and in the court below, and in the opposite house, and the passage under it. Several of the soldiers and of the rich were there; and verily, the power of the Lord was present to heal them. My dear brethren, who among you writes first to strengthen our hands in God ? Where is our Brother Bray x and Fish, and whosoever else finds his heart moved to send unto us the word of exhortation? You should no more be wanting in your instruction to, than your prayers for, Your affectionate, but weak, brother, 6 Turning to Nash she said, " Sir, we come for the Food of our Souls. You care for your Body."' A month has passed. Wesley writes another of his usual Monday letters on his work in the west of England. Again, this record of formative events and historic scenes in Methodism is fuller and fresher in this newsy, descriptive, talking letter than that in his Journal. As one handles the faded original, all its words seem to quiver with life, down to the exclamations of the postscript, ' O Jemmy, Jemmy.' The scenes reappear, humorous and pathetic by turns. What a dark England it is ! ' I offered them books,' says Wesley, ' but they could not read.' As on page 53, we give Wesley's many capitals in his letter. Here are some preludious drops of the showers and wild storms of opposition which Wesley and his helpers will meet. And here are his consummate tact and happy wit which will help him through as if he possessed a charmed 1 A brazier and a godly man in Little Britain, London, at whose house Charles Wesley lodged. 98 CONCERNING METHODISM life. Beau Nash, the strange leader and exacting ruler of fashion and folly, was styled ' King of Bath.' On his gains by gambling he held high revel in that city, and drove about in royal style. Here he rudely pushes through the crowd of listeners to stop Wesley preaching. The famous encounter was evidently in the open air, probably in Richard Marchant's field. Neither the Pump Boom, where Nash's portrait and ' Rules' now hang, nor the Assembly Room, would contain the ' thousand new hearers ' of that day. When he asked why the people came to hear Wesley, he got his answer home from an unnamed sufferer from man's ancient hunger. To the Brethren at Fetter Lane> London, by Mr, James Hutton. BRISTOL, June 7, 1739. M Y DEAR BRETHREN,—After I came from preaching at Weavers' Hall on Monday, many came to advise me not to go to the Brickyard in the afternoon, because of some terrible things that were to be done there if I did. This Report brought many thither of what they call the better sort, so that it added a thousand, at least, to the usual audience. . . . My nose began bleeding in the midst of the Sermon, but presently stopped, so that I went on without interruption and the power of God fell on all, so that the scoffers stood looking one on another, but none opened his mouth. All Bath on Tuesday was big with expectation of what a great Man was to do to me there; And I was much intreated not to preach, because no one knew what might happen. By this Report also I gained (I believe) a thousand new Hearers, of the Rich and Great of this world. I told them plainly, ' The Scripture hath concluded all under sin, High and Low, Rich and Poor, one with another.' They appeared not a little surprised, and sinking apace into Seriousness, when their Champion appeared, and having forced his way 99 " JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS through the People, asked by what authority I did these things. I answered, ' By the Authority of Jesus my Master, conveyed to me by the (now) Archbishop of Canterbury.'' He said it was contrary to the Act of Parliament: there was an Act of Parliament against Conventicles. I replied,' The Conventicles there mentioned were seditious Meetings. But there were no such here.' He said, ' Yes, it was—for I frighted People out of their wits.'' I asked ' If he had ever heard me preach ? If not, how he could judge of what he never heard ?' He said,' By common Report, for he knew my Character.'' I then asked,' Pray, Sir, are you a Justice of Peace, or the Mayor of this City ?' Answer: ' No, I am not.' Q. ' Why, then, Sir, Pray, by what authority do you ask me these things ? ' (Here he paused a little, and I went on.) ' Give me leave, Sir, to ask, is not your name Nash ?' Answer: ' Sir, my name is Nash.' [Wesley says], ' Why then, Sir, I trust common Report is no good Evidence of Truth.' (Here the Laugh turned full against him, so that he looked about and could scarce recover. Then a Bystander said) ' Sir, let an old woman answer him.' Then turning to Mr. Nash she said, ' Sir, if you ask what we come here for; we come for the Food of our Souls. You care for your Body. We care for our Souls.' He replied not one word, but turned and walked away. We immediately began praying for him, and then for all the Despisers. As we returned^ they followed and hissed us along the Streets: But when any of them asked, Which is He ? And I answered ' I am H e / they were immediately silent. Ten or 12 fine ladies followed me into the Passage of Richard Marchant's House. I turned back to them and told them I supposed what they wanted was to look at me; such they were very welcome to do : Perceiving them to be more Serious, I added, ' I do not expect the Rich of the world to hear me. For I speak plain Truth ; a 100 CONCERNING METHODISM thing you know little of, and do not desire to know/ A few words more passed between us, and, I hope, not in vain. Wednesday 6. Two men and one woman were baptized. About 2500 were at Baptist Mills, to whom I explained the ninth of St. John. In the evening, after our Meeting in Baldwin Street, I went (in obedience to GOD'S command by Lot) to the house of Mrs. Cooper, the supposed Prophetess. Her agitations were nothing near so violent as those of Mary Plewit are. She prayed awhile (as under the Hand of GOD) and then spoke to me for above half an hour. What Spirit she spoke by I know not. The words were good. Some of them were these. ' Thou art yet in darkness. But yet a little while and I will rend the veil, and Thou shalt see the King in his Beauty/ I felt no power while she spoke. Appearances are against her, but I judge nothing before the time. On Thursday, after exhorting the little Society at Pensford (who stand as a rock, continually battered but not shaken), I went to Priestdown, where we had a larger Company than before. I preached on ' What must I do to be saved ?' It rained hard, but none went away except one young woman, who came again in a few minutes. In the midst of the Prayer Two men (who came for that purpose) began singing a Ballad. After a few mild words (for I saw none that were angry) we began singing a Psalm, which utterly put them to Silence. We then prayed for them, and they were quite confounded. I offered them Books, but they could not read. I trust this will be a day much to be remembered by them, for the loving-kindness of the Lord. My brethren, Be Meek and Lowly ; Be Wise, but not Prudent. Stir up the gift that is in you by keeping close together. Love one another, and be ye Thankful. You 101 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS are much in the Heart, as well as in the Prayers of, Your affectionate Brother in Christ. Jemmy Hutton, If I have not 50 more Hymns next Friday, I will not thank you. Where are the 12 Haliburton's and the Nalson's x Sermons which Mr. Seward writes me word He ordered you to send me, with 20 Hymns on his account. 0 Jemmy, Jemmy ! ( I t is a poor Case that you and I must be talking thus.' Here Wesley defends Methodist work and teaching in a letter to the Hev. George Whitefield (1714-1770). Argument, plea, satire, rebuke, are all here. At Oxford, in London, Bristol, and Kings wood, he was closely associated with the Wesleys in their early work. In a letter in the Everett Collection, Whitefield styles Wesley ' my Spiritual Father in Christ,' and in our letter Wesley makes pathetic appeal to him as his son. Whitefield was an impassioned dramatic evangelist. The immediate effects of his appeals in England and America recall those which followed Peter's sermon on the day of Pentecost. A month earlier than this letter, a separation occurred between Whitefield and the Wesleys, occasioned by different doctrinal views. John Wesley preached his classic sermon ' On Free Grace' 2 (Rom. viii. 3$) in June 1739. I t was soon published in Bristol. This proved to be another decisive step taken there. Southey thought it ' one of the most able and eloquent of all Wesley's discourses, a triumphant specimen of impassioned argument.' It is a reasoned statement of evangelical Arminianism which offers the saving grace of God freely to all men, and a stern repudiation of Calvinism and its teach1 So Wesley always spelled the name of Robert Nelson, the Nonjuror, author of Festivals and Fasts. 2 Curiously, Wesley did not include this in the volumes of his standard sermons, but among his controversial writings (see Works, 1811 ed., vol. viii. p. 409). Southey and Tyerman gave large extracts. 102 CONCERNING METHODISM ing of the election of some men t o eternal life and some t o eternal d e a t h . Charles Wesley's hymn of thirty-six stanzas, entitled ' U n i v e r s a l R e d e m p t i o n / was appended t o it. Whitefield's teaching had become pronouncedly Calvinistic. H e declared t o Charles Wesley, ' I cannot preach t h e gospel now without speaking of election.*' ' So t h e r e were now,' says Wesley, ' two sorts of M e t h o d i s t s : those for particular and those for general redemption.*' Adherents of t h e former view were gathered into t h e Countess of H u n t i n g don's Connexion and t h e Calvinistic (Presbyterian) M e t h o d ist Church in W a l e s ; while those who held t h e l a t t e r view followed Wesley. Happily, t h e strained relations between him and t h e Wesleys were soon relieved, a n d continued t o be brotherly and cordial until Whitefield's death. Wesley and the defenders and opponents of these opposed views were involved in perhaps t h e bitterest of all doctrinal controversies. Prejudiced reports were behind such letters from Whitefield as Wesley here replies t o . T h e quaint references in this letter t o t h e earliest Methodist buildings, their beginnings a n d simple furnishings, are full of interest. ' T h e Society Room a t B r i s t o l ' — Wesley's ' New Room in t h e Horsefair,' and Broad mead (now the Welsh Calvinistic Methodist (Presbyterian) Chapel)—was erected in M a y 1739, t o accommodate two religious societies in t h e city. M a n y of their members became Methodists, and this building was their meeting-place. I n p a r t i t is t h e oldest Methodist building in t h e world. Much of i t was rebuilt in 1748. W i t h its many small rooms and primitive furniture, it is sacred t o all Methodists everywhere, as redolent of Wesley and his early work and workers. 1 * T h e school for poor colliers' which his letter refers t o also still stands in the grounds of t h e Reformatory a t Kingswood, Bristol. I t is the oldest entire Methodist building in t h e world. 2 J o h n Cennick, named in t h e letter, formerly a 1 Wesley and Kingswood, p. 127 et seq. ; Journal, vol. ii. pp. 194, 253. 2 Wesley and Kingswood, pp. 49, 119 et seq. While these pages are in the press, local representative Methodists are raising a fund to preserve the exterior and interior of this ancient building as nearly as possible unaltered, while providing for necessary repairs; and for erecting memorial tablets on it and other historic Methodist buildings in Bristol and Kingswood. 103 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS surveyor and schoolmaster, came to help Wesley at Kingswood, and was the first Methodist lay-preacher.1 He followed Whitefield, and later became a Moravian preacher. To the Rev. George Whitefield. LONDON^ April 27j 2 1741. Would you have me deal plainly with you, my brother ? I believe you would. Then by the grace of God I will. Of many things I find you are not rightly informed. Of others you speak what you have not well weighed. ' T h e Society Room at Bristol,' you say, 'is adorned.' How? Why with a piece of green cloth nailed on the desk, two sconces for eight candles each in the middle, and Nay, I know no more. Now which of these could be spared. I cannot tell: nor would I desire either more adorning or less. ' But lodgings are made for me or my brother.' That is, in plain English, there is a little room by the school where I speak with the people that come to me; and a garret in which a bed is placed for me. And do you grudge me this ? Is this the voice of my brother, my son Whitefield ? You say further that * the children at Bristol are clothed as well as taught.' I am sorry for i t ; for the cloth is not paid for yet, and was bought without my consent or knowledge. ' But those of Kings wood have been neglected.' This is not so, notwithstanding the heavy debt which lay upon i t : one master and one mistress have been in the house ever since it has been capable of receiving them. A second master was placed there some months since, and I have long been seeking for two proper mistresses. So that as 1 Wesley and Kingstvood, p. 88; A New History of Methodism, vol. i. p. 292. Wesley's diary for this day makes no mention of writing to Whitefield. It does on the next day, 28th.—;-Journal', vol. ii. p. 450. 3 104 CONCERNING METHODISM much has been done (as matters stand), if not more than I can answer for to God and man. Well but, 6 You sent down brother Cennick to be schoolmaster, whom I have turned out.' What, from being schoolmaster? You know he never was so at all. You know he now neither designs nor desires it. Hitherto then there is no ground for the heavy charge of * perverting your design for the poor colliers.' Two years since, your design was to build them a school that their children also might be taught to fear the Lord. To this end you collected some money more than once; how much I cannot say till I have my papers. But this I know, it was not near one-half of what has been expended on the work. This design you then recommended to me, and I pursued it with all my might through such a train of difficulties as (I will be bold to say) you have not yet met with in your life. For many months I collected money wherever I was; in Kingswood for that house only; in Bristol for the schoolhouse to be built there ; in other places, generally for Bath. In June 1739, being able to procure none any other way, I bought a little piece of ground and began building thereon, though I had not then a quarter of the money requisite to finish. However, taking all the debt upon myself, the creditors were willing to stay; and then it was that I took possession of it in my own name, viz. when the foundation was laid, and from that time to this. Only I immediately made my will fixing my brother and you to succeed me therein. Now, my brother, I will answer your main question. I think you can claim no right to that building, either in equity or law, before my demise. And every honest lawyer will tell you the same. But if you repent of your collecting the money towards it, I will repay it as speedily as I can; although I now owe more than two hundred pounds on account of Kingswood School only. 105 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS But it is a poor case that you and I must be talking thus. Indeed, these things ought not so to be. It lay in your power to have prevented all, and yet to have borne testimony to what you call the truth. If you had disliked my sermon,1 you might have printed another on the same text, and have answered my proofs, without mentioning my name. This had been fair and friendly. Whereas, to proceed as you have done is so far from friendship that it is not moral honesty. Moral honesty does not allow of a treacherous wound, or of the bewraying of secrets. I will refer the point even to the judgement of Jews, Turk, infidel, or heretic. Indeed among the latter (i.e. heretics) you publicly place me; for you rank all the maintainers of universal redemption with Socinians themselves. Alas, my brother, do you not know even this—that the Socinians allow no redemption at all ? that Socinus himself speaks thus, Tot a redemptio nostra per Christum metaphora ? 2 and says expressly Christ did not die as a ransom for any, but only as an example for all mankind ? How easy were it for me to hit many other palpable blots in that which you call an answer to my sermon ? And how above measure contemptible would you then appear to all impartial men either of sense or learning? But I spare you. Mine hand shall not be upon you. The Lord be judge between me and thee ! Alas, my brother, in what manner are you proceeding now ? In what manner have you been proceeding, even since you unwisely put that weapon into the enemies' hands ? You have been continually gathering up all the improper expressions of those who were supposed to be in (some sense) perfect, and then retailing them in your public preaching to the scoffers of the world! Now you well know that this was 1 2 106 The sermon entitled ' Free Grace' referred to above. ' The whole of our redemption by Christ is a metaphor.' CONCERNING METHODISM just the same thing (in effect), and made the same impression on your hearers, as if under every one of those pictures [you wrote], ' John Wesley.' Was this fair or upright dealing ? A Spaniard would have behaved more tenderly to his English prisoner. Put the case now that I should make reprisals!—that I should deal with you as you have done with me!—that I should publicly repeat all the wrong expressions which I have heard from predestinarians ! What would follow ? Why, all that heard me would run from a predestinarian as they would from a mad dog. But you are very safe. I cannot meet you here. This field you have all to yourself. I cannot dwell on those things which have an immediate tendency to make you odious and contemptible. The general tenor both of my public and private exhortations, when I touch thereon at all (as even my enemies know if they would testify), is, ' Spare the young man, even Absalom, for my sake/ * Every Man has Authority to save the Life of a dying Man . . . every Christian to save Souls.' By a parallel argument between the case of a doctor whose title is proved by the cures he effects, and the results of the labours of his lay preachers, Wesley defends these workers as true ministers of the Gospel, How shrewdly he applies his test all round ! His logic is remorseless. Twenty-three years later he repeated this letter to another objector.1 To a serious Clergyman. TULLAMORE, May 4, 1748. have at present neither leisure nor inclination to enter into a formal controversy; but you will REVEREND SIR,—I 1 ' A letter to the Reverend Mr. Fleury,' Works, vol. ix. p. 182. 107 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS give me leave just to offer a few hints relating to the subject of last night's conversation :— i 1. Seeing life and health are things of so great importance, it is, without question, highly expedient that physicians should have all possible advantages of learning and education. % That trial should be made of them, by competent judges, before they practise publicly. 3. That after such trial, they be authorised to practise by those who are empowered to convey that authority. 4. And that, while they are preserving the lives of others, they should have what is sufficient to sustain their own. 5. But supposing a gentleman, bred at the university in Dublin, with all the advantages of education, after he has undergone all the usual trials, and been regularly authorised to practise : 6. Suppose, I say, this physician settles at for some years, and yet makes no cures at all; but, after trying his skill on five hundred persons, cannot show that he has healed one; many of his patients dying under his hands, and the rest remaining just as they were before he came: 7. Will you condemn a man who, having some skill in physic, and a tender compassion for those who are sick or dying all around him, cures many of those., without fee or reward, whom the doctor could not cure ? 8. A t least did not (which is the same thing as to the case in hand), were it only for this reason, because he did not go to them, and they would not come to him ? 9. Will you condemn him because he has not learning, or has not had an university education ? W h a t then ? He cures those whom the man of learning and education cannot cure ! 108 CONCERNING METHODISM 10. Will you object that he is no physician, nor has any authority to practise ? I cannot come into your opinion. I think, Medicus est qui medetur,' He is a physician who heals'; and that every man has authority to save the life of a dying man. But if you only mean he has no authority to take fees, I contend not : for he takes none at all. 11. Nay, and I am afraid it will hold, on the other hand, Medicus non est qui non medetur; I am afraid, if we use propriety of speech, 6 He is no physician who works no cure.' 12. ' O, but he has taken his degree of Doctor of Physic, and therefore has authority.'' Authority to do what ? tf Why, to heal all the sick that will employ him.'' But (to waive the case of those who will not employ him; and would you have even their lives thrown away ?) he does not heal those that do employ him. He that was sick before is sick still; or else he is gone hence, and is no more seen. Therefore his authority is not worth a rush; for it serves not the end for which it was given. 13. And surely he has no authority to kill them, by hindering another from saving their lives ! 14. If he either attempts or desires to hinder him, if he condemns or dislikes him for it, it is plain to all thinking men he regards his own fees more than the lives of his patients. II Now, to apply: 1. Seeing life everlasting, and holiness, or health of soul, are things of so great importance, it is highly expedient that ministers, being physicians of the soul, should have all advantages of education and learning. 2. That full trial should be made of them in all respects, and that by the most competent judges, before they enter 109 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS on the public exercise of their office, the saving souls from death. 3. That after such trial they should be authorised to exercise that office by those who are empowered to convey that authority. (I believe bishops are empowered to do this and have been so from the apostolic age.) 4. And that those whose souls they save ought, meantime, to provide them what is needful for the body. 5. But suppose a gentleman bred at the university of Dublin, with all the advantages of education, after he has undergone the usual trials, and been regularly authorised to save souls from death : 6. Suppose, I say, this minister settles at for some years, and yet saves no souls at all, saves no sinners from their sins; but after he has preached all this time to five or six hundred persons, cannot show that he has converted one from the error of his ways ; many of his parishioners dying as they lived, and the rest remaining just as they were before he came : 7. Will you condemn a man who, having compassion on dying souls, and some knowledge of the gospel of Christ, without any temporal reward, saves them from their sins whom the minister could not save ? 8. At least did not, nor ever was likely to do i t ; for he did not go to them, and they would not come to him. 9. Will you condemn such a preacher because he has not learning, or has not had an university education ? W h a t then ? He saves those sinners from their sins whom the man of learning and education cannot save. A peasant being brought before the College of Physicians at Paris, a learned doctor accosted h i m , ' What, friend, do you pretend to prescribe to people that have agues ? Dost thou know what an ague is ?' He replied, ' Yes, sir, an ague is what I can cure, and you cannot.' 110 CONCERNING METHODISM Will you object, ' B u t he is no minister, nor has any authority to save souls' ? I must beg leave to dissent from you in this. I think he is a true evangelical minister, Acdfcovos, * servant' of Christ and His Church, who ovrco^ Siarcovet,' so ministers ' as to save souls from death, to reclaim sinners from their sins; and that every Christian, if he is able to do it, has authority to save a dying soul. But if you only mean, ' H e has no authority to take tithes,"' I grant it. He takes none. As he has freely received, so he freely gives. 11. But, to carry the matter a little farther; I am afraid it will hold, on the other hand, with regard to the soul as well as the body, Medicus non est qui medetur,' He is not a physician who effects no cures.'' I am afraid reasonable men will be much inclined to think,' He that saves no souls is no minister of Christ.' 12. ' O, but he is ordained, and therefore has authority.'' Authority to do what ? ' To save all souls that will put themselves under his care.'' True ; but (to waive the case of them that will not, and would you desire that even those should perish ?) he does not, in fact, save them that are under his care. Therefore, what end does his authority serve ? tie that was a drunkard is a drunkard still. The same is true of the Sabbath-breaker, the thief, the common swearer. This is the best of the case ; for many have died in their iniquity, and their blood will God require at the watchman's hand. IS. For surely he has no authority to murder souls, either by his neglect, by his smooth, if not false, doctrine, or by hindering another from plucking them out of the fire and bringing them to life everlasting. 1 4 If he either attempts or desires to hinder him, if he condemns or is displeased with him for it, how great reason 111 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS is there to fear that he regards his own profit more than the salvation of souls!—I am, Reverend sir. Your aifectionate brother. ' The unspeakable Advantages which the Methodists enjoy in regard to Public Worship.' The London Methodist services here described and so warmly commended by Wesley were held in the Foundery and the West Street Chapel. He or his brother Charles, or some other clergyman conducted the service, read and offered extempore prayers, preached there, and administered the sacraments. In the absence of the Wesleys one of the Methodist preachers usually preached the sermon. It was not until long afterwards (1826) that the Methodist preachers were allowed to give the Lord's Supper, of which Wesley speaks, at City Road Chapel, the successor of the old Foundery. This sacerdotal restriction brought the Society into straits and made it sometimes dependent on unworthy clerics.1 Wesley had evidently been present in his journeyings at ineffective Church services, and had been distressed by unseemly behaviour thereat. Choir-boys, clergymen, and parish clerks get stern words. As to the last, he was perhaps thinking of the ridiculous clerk 2 who served at Epworth. Wesley liked quick, hearty singing. He often sang eight times a day, privately, or with others. His picture of the London Methodist services may be compared with the freer and heartier ones at Bristol which Joseph Williams, a Dissenter of Kidderminster, saw in 1739 and described. Charles Wesley's fervent preaching and praying greatly impressed him. He says, c Never did I hear such praying or such 1 See A New History of Methodism, vol. i. p . 489. H e gave out there * a hymn of my own composing,' to m a r k the return of K i n g William to L o n d o n after a journey, t h u s — ' King William is come home, come home, King William home is come; Therefoie together let us sing T h e hymn t h a t ' s call'd Te D'um.' 2 —Clarke, Wesley Family, 112 p . 233. CONCERNING METHODISM singing; never did I see and hear such marks of fervency of spirit in the service of God, as that in this Society. At the close of every single petition, a serious "Amen," like a rushing sound of waters, ran through the whole Society." To a Friend. P E N R Y N , CORNWALL, September 20, DEAR 1757. SIR,—The longer I am absent from London, and the more I attend the service of the Church in other pilaces, the more I am convinced of the unspeakable advantage which the people called Methodists enjoy. I mean with regard to public worship, particularly on the Lord's Day. The church where they assemble is not gay or splendid, which might have been a hindrance on the one hand; nor sordid or dirty, which might give distaste on the other ; but plain as well as clean. The persons who assemble there are not a giddy crowd who come chiefly to see and be seen; nor a company of goodly, formal, outside Christians whose religion lies in a dull round of duties; but a people most of whom do, and the rest earnestly seek to, worship God in spirit and in truth. Accordingly they do not spend their time there in bowing and curtsying, or in staring about them ; but in looking upward and looking inward, in hearkening to the voice of God, and pouring out their hearts before Him. It is also no small advantage that the person who reads prayers (though not always the same, yet) is always one who may be supposed to speak from his heart, one whose life is no reproach to his profession; and one who performs that solemn part of divine service, not in a careless, hurrying, slovenly manner, but seriously and slowly, as becomes him who is transacting so high an affair between God and man. Nor are their solemn addresses to God interrupted either H 118 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS by the formal drawl of a parish clerk or the screaming of boys, who bawl out what they neither feel nor understand, or the unseasonable and unmeaning impertinence of a voluntary on the organ. When it is seasonable to sing praise to God, they do it with the spirit, and with the understanding also ; not in the miserable, scandalous doggerel of Hopkins and Sternhold, but in psalms and hymns which are both sense and poetry: such as would sooner provoke a critic to turn Christian than a Christian to turn critic. W h a t they sing is therefore a proper continuation of the spiritual and reasonable service, being selected for that end (not by a poor humdrum wretch who can scarce read what he drones out with such an air of importance, but) by one who knows what he is about, and how to connect the preceding with the following part of the service. Nor does he take j u s t ' two staves,' but more or less, as may best raise the soul to God; especially when sung in well-composed and well-adapted tunes, not by a handful of wild, unawakened striplings, but by a whole serious congregation; and these, not lolling at ease or in the indecent posture of sitting, drawling out one word after another, but all standing before God and praising Him lustily, and with a good courage. Nor is it a little advantage as to the next part of the service, to hear a preacher whom you know to live as he speaks, speaking the genuine gospel of present salvation through faith, wrought in the heart by the Holy Ghost; declaring present, free, full justification, and enforcing every branch of inward and outward holiness. And this you hear done in the most clear, plain, simple, unaffected language; yet with an earnestness becoming the importance of the subject, and with the demonstration of the Spirit. W i t h regard to the last and most awful part of divine service, the celebration of the Lord's Supper, although we 114 CONCERNING METHODISM cannot say that either the unworthiness of the minister or the unholiness of some of the communicants deprives the rest of a blessing from God, yet do they greatly lessen the comfort of receiving. But these discouragements are removed from you: you have proof that he who administers fears God: and you have no reason to believe that any of your fellow-communicants walk unworthy of their profession. Add to this that the whole service is performed in a decent and solemn manner, is enlivened by hymns suitable to the occasion, and concluded with prayer that comes not out of feigned lips. Surely then, of all the people in Great Britain the Methodists would be the most inexcusable should they let any opportunity slip of attending that worship which has so many advantages, should they prefer any before it, or not continually improve by the advantages they enjoy ! What can be pleaded for them, if they do not worship God in spirit and in t r u t h ; if they are still outward worshippers only, approaching God with their lips while their hearts are far from Him ? Yea, if, having known Him, they do not daily grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ!—I am, Your affectionate friend. ' You are not in the Society. Why not ?' Since the Methodists enjoy such advantages, and other privileges also, Wesley here urges one to join in membership with them. He is a worshipper already. Here are—to adapt a famous title from Richard Baxter—' More Reasons for Church Membership, and No Reason against it."' Wesley published this letter in his Journal, and * I desire it may be seriously considered by those to whom it belongs.' I t deserves such consideration. Age has not withered this earnest pleading. It might be copied and sent to-day to any devout, generous, unattached Christian, like this, on the fringe of a Christian Church. I t might well be 115 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS reprinted and widely used. Where is there a more cogent appeal on this scriptural duty and privilege ? To a Worshipper among the Methodists. MANCHESTER, July 1 1 , 1764. was one thing, when I was with you, that gave me pain : you are not in the society. But why not ? Are there not sufficient arguments for it to move any reasonable man ? Do you not hereby make an open confession of Christ, of what you really believe to be His work, and of those whom you judge to be, in a proper sense, His people and His messengers ? By this means do you not encourage His people, and strengthen the hands of His messengers ? And is not this the way to enter into the spirit, and share the blessing, of a Christian community ? Hereby, likewise, you may have the benefit of the advices and exhortations at the meeting of the society : and also of provoking one another, at the private meetings, to love and good works. The ordinary objections to such an union are of little weight with you. You are not afraid of the expense. You already give unto the Lord as much as you need do then : And you are not ashamed of the Gospel of Christ, even in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation. Perhaps you will say, ' I am joined in affection.'' T r u e ; but not to so good effect. This joining half-way, this being a friend to, but not a member of, the society, is by no means so open a confession of the work and servants of God. Many go thus far who dare not go farther, who are ashamed to bear the reproach of an entire union. Either you are ashamed, or you are not. If you are, break through at once; if you are not, come into the light, and do what those well-meaning cowards dare not do. This imperfect union is not so 116 DEAR SIR.,—There CONCERNING METHODISM encouraging to the people, not so strengthening to the preachers. Rather it is weakening their hands, hindering their work, and laying a stumbling-block in the way of others ; for what can any man think who knows you are so well acquainted with them, and yet do not join their society ? What can he think but that you know them too well to come any nearer to them ; that you know that kind of union to be useless, if not hurtful ? And yet by this very union is the whole (external) work of God upheld throughout the nation; besides all the spiritual good which accrues to each member. O delay no longer, for the sake of the work, for the sake of the world, for the sake of your brethren ! Join them inwardly and outwardly, heart and hand, for the sake of your own soul. There is something not easily explained in the fellowship of the Spirit, which we enjoy with a society of living Christians. You have no need to give up your share therein, and the various blessings that result from it. You have no need to exclude yourself from the benefits of the advice and exhortations given from time to time. These are by no means to be despised, even supposing you have yourself more understanding than him that gives them. You need not lose the benefit of those prayers which experience shows are attended with a peculiar blessing. 4 But I do not care to meet a class; I find no good in it.' Suppose you find even a dislike, a loathing of i t ; may not this be natural, or even diabolical ? In spite of this, break through, make a fair trial. It is but a lion in the way. Meet only six times (with previous prayer), and see if it do not vanish away. But if it be a cross, still bear it for the sake of your brethren. c But I want to gain my friends and relations. , If so, stand firm. If you give way, you hurt them, and they will press upon you the more. If you do not, you will probably gain them, otherwise you confirm both their wrong notions and wrong tempers. Because I 117 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS love you I have spoken fully and freely ; to know that I have not spoken in vain will be a great satisfaction to. Your affectionate brother. ' A great desire of Union between the Preachers of the Gospel.' The letter from the Colman Collection, given incompletely by Tyerman, is of special interest. Selina, Countess of Huntingdon (1707-1791), founded the denomination which bears her name, and by reason of her abilities, character, and social and religious influence, is one of the notable figures of the eighteenth century. 1 She appointed Whitefield and other clergymen as her chaplains, so that without difficulty they might minister irregularly to the neglected, rich and poor. As shown on page 102, the doctrines which she held and vigorously encouraged were in sharp contrast with those of Wesley and his followers. The rival leaders were sometimes in conflict, even at the end of their long lives, as we shall see in Wesley's letter to Lady Maxwell (page 418). Onlookers and critics referred to them satirically as Pope John and Pope Joan. Here, however, as before, Wesley seeks an amicable arrangement between the two bands of workers, and others also. The Countess appeared to be anxious for it, as did also a few clergymen. A month earlier than this letter, Wesley had sent an important proposal 2 for it to fifty of them. He sought unity with them, not in ' opinion,'' ' expression,'' or ' outward order,' but ' a good understanding ' and friendliness in ' propagating vital religion.' The Countess sent him an encouraging letter. Wesley names the Rev. Richard Hart, vicar of St. George's Church, Bristol, in which city the Methodists were numerous, who was one of three clergymen who responded to his catholic appeal. But the Countess did not attend the next Methodist Con1 See her Life and Times, by a member of the Houses of Shirley and Hastings (1839), and The Countess of Huntingdon and her Circle, by Sarah Tytler. 2 Journal^ vol. v. et seq. 118 CONCERNING METHODISM ference at Bristol, as Wesley suggests. Twelve of the clergy to whom Wesley had appealed did so, and requested that the Methodist preachers should be withdrawn from every parish where there is ' an awakened minister.' Neither Wesley nor his preachers, except Charles Wesley, would agree to this, and this attempt to secure brotherly concord and co-operation failed. To the Countess of Huntingdon. NEWCASTLE-ON-TYNE, May 16, 1764. M Y DEAR LADY,—I am much obliged to your ladyship for your encouraging answer, which plainly speaks a heart devoted to God, and longing for the furtherance of His kingdom. I have likewise received an exceeding friendly letter from Mr. Hart, testifying a great desire of union between the preachers of the gospel. Only he carries the point considerably farther than I do, proposing a free debate concerning our several opinions. Now this, I fear, we are not yet able to bear. I fear it might occasion some sharpness of expression, if not of spirit too, which might tear open the wounds before they are fully closed. I am far from being assured that I could bear it myself, and perhaps others might be as weak as I. To me therefore it still seems most expedient to avoid disputing of every kind, at least for a season, till we have tasted each other's spirit, and confirmed our love to each other. I own freely, I am sick of disputing; I am weary to bear it. My whole soul cries out ' Peace ! Peace !' at least with the children of God, that we may all unite our strength to carry on the war against the ' rulers of the darkness of this world.' Still, I ask but one thing, I can require no more, ' Is thy heart right, as my heart is with thine ? If it be, give me thy hand ; let us take sweet counsel together, and strengthen each other in the Lord.' And the advantage in the proposal I make is this : If it 119 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS should be (which God forbid !) that I should find none to join with me therein, I will (by God's help) comply with it myself. None can hinder this; and, I think, my brother will be likeminded, yea, and all who act in connection with us. Probably it might contribute much to this end, if those of our brethren who have opportunity would be at Bristol on Thursday, the ninth of August. We might then spend a few hours in free conversation, either apart from, or in conjunction with, the other preachers. I apprehend if your ladyship could then be near, it might be of excellent service, in confirming any kind and friendly disposition which our Lord might plant in the hearts of His servants. Surely if this can be effectually done, we shall again see Satan as lightning fall from heaven. Then * The children of thy faith and prayer Thy joyful eyes shall see ; Shall see the prosperous church, and share In her prosperity !' —I am, my dear lady, your ladyship's most affectionate and obedient servant. 6 By these Marks the Methodists desire to be distinguished.' With much spirit and vigour Wesley here defines and defends a characteristic Methodist doctrine, Christian Perfection, and deals with the notorious Dr. Dodd. In his tract The Character of a Methodist, published in 174&,1 Wesley says that the distinguishing marks of a Methodist ' are not his opinions/ 'his words or phrases/ his 'actions, customs, or usages of an indifferent nature; nor is he distinguished by his laying the whole stress of religion on any single part of it.' ' A Methodist is one who has " the love of God shed abroad in his heart by the Holy Ghost given unto h i m " ; one who u loves the Lord his God with 1 120 Works, vol. viii. p. 340. CONCERNING METHODISM all his heart, and with all his soul, and with all his mind, and with all his strength." God is the joy of his heart, and the desire of his soul.'' 6 And while he thus always exercises his love to God, by praying without ceasing, rejoicing evermore, and in everything giving thanks, this commandment is written in his heart, " That he who loveth God, love his brother also."" And he accordingly loves his neighbour as himself; he loves every man as his own soul.' Chalmers was evidently right when he said, * Methodism is Christianity in earnest.' Wesley here emphasises that this is the ideal: what the Methodist desires to be. For himself he says, ' I tell you flat, I have not attained the character I draw.' William Dodd (1729-1777), here ' Rusticulus,' had a sad career. He was a fashionable preacher in London and a Royal chaplain. From this office he was displaced for offering a large bribe to secure a valuable Church living. Soon afterwards he was convicted of forgery, for which crime he was executed. He had pursued Wesley and the Methodists for many years, and poured the vilest abuse upon him and them. Nevertheless, he thrice sent for Wesley to visit him in Newgate. Wesley went. He believed Dodd died penitent and pardoned. 1 To the Editor of Lloyd's Evening Post. LONDON, March 5, 1767. SIR,—Many times the publisher of the Christian Magazine has attacked me without fear or wit; and hereby he has convinced his impartial readers of one thing at least— that (as the vulgar say) his fingers itch to be at me; that he has a passionate desire to measure swords with me. But I have other work upon my hands; I can employ the short remainder of my life to better purpose. The occasion of his late attack is this:—Five or six and thirty years ago, I much admired the character of a perfect Christian drawn by Clemens Alexandrinus. Five or six and 1 See his account of Dr. Dodd, Arminian Magazine, 1783, p. 358. 121 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS twenty years ago, a thought came into my mind of drawing such a character myself, only in a more scriptural manner, and mostly in the very words of Scripture. This I entitled The Character of a Methodist, believing that curiosity would incite more persons to read it, and also that some prejudice might thereby be removed from candid men. But that none might imagine I intended a panegyric either on myself or my friends, I guarded against this in the very title-page, saying, both in the name of myself and them, c Not as though I had already attained, either were already perfect.' To the same effect I speak in the conclusion, fc These are the principles and practices of our sect: these are the marks of a true Methodist'; i.e. a true Christian, as I immediately after explain myself: 'By these alone do those who are in derision so called desire to be distinguished from other men' (p. 11). ' By these marks do we labour to distinguish ourselves from those whose minds or lives are not according to the Gospel of Christ' (p. IS). Upon this Rusticulus, or Dr. Dodd, says,' A Methodist, according to Mr. Wesley, is one who is perfect, and sinneth not in thought, word, or deed.' Sir, have me excused. This is not i according to Mr. Wesley.' I have told all the world I am not perfect; and yet you allow me to be a Methodist. / tell you fiat, I have not attained the character I draw. Will you pin it upon me in spite of my teeth ? ' But Mr. Wesley says, the other Methodists have.' I say no such thing. What I say, after having given a scriptural account of a perfect Christian, is this:—'By these marks the Methodists desire to be distinguished from other men; by these we labour to distinguish ourselves.' And do you not yourself desire and labour after the very same thing ? But you insist, 'Mr. Wesley affirms the Methodists' {i.e. 12a CONCERNING METHODISM all Methodists) ' t o be perfectly holy and righteous,'' Where do I affirm this ? Not in the tract before us. In the front of this I affirm just the contrary; and that I affirm it anywhere else is more than I know. Be pleased, sir, to point out the place. Till this is done, all you add (bitterly enough) is mere brutumfulmen; and the Methodists (so called) may still declare (without any impeachment of their sincerity) that they do not come to the holy table ' trusting in their own righteousness, but in God's manifold and great mercies.^—I am, sir, Yours, etc. In an important note 1 Wesley cleverly summarised the system, condition, and position of Methodism thirty years after its rise. Professor Liden, a distinguished Swede, professor of History at Lund, visited England in 1769. He was much attracted by the Wesleys and their work, and heard Wesley preach. Wesley answered his questions thus:— 6 1. There are many thousand Methodists in Great Britain and Ireland which are not formed into societies. Indeed, none are but those (or rather a part of those) who are under the care of Mr. Wesley. These at present contain a little less than thirty thousand persons. 2. The places at which there is constant preaching (three or four times a week at least) are the Foundery, near Moorfields, the French Church (in West Street), near the Seven Dials (at these two places there is preaching every morning and evening), the French Church, in Spitalfields, the chapel in Snowsfields, Southwark, the chapel in Wapping, and one not far from Smithfield. 3. They have many schools for teaching, reading, writing, and arithmetic, but only one for teaching the higher parts of learning. This is kept in Kings wood, near Bristol, and 1 From 'British Methodism,' vol. ii. p. 799, by Rev. Thos. E. Brigden, in Hurst's History of Methodism. 123 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS contains about forty scholars. These are all boarders, and might be abundantly more, but the house will not contain them. " T h e rules of Kings wood School" give an account of the books read and the method pursued therein. 4. I believe some of the best preachers are James Morgan, Peter Jaco, Jos. Cownley, T. Simpson, John Helton, John Pawson, Alex. Mather, Tho. Olivers, Sam Levick, Duncan Wright, Jacob Rowell, Christopher Hopper, Dan Bumstead, Alexander M'Nab, and William Thompson. Each of these preachers has his food wherever he labours, and twelve pounds a year for clothes and other expenses. If he is married, he has ten pounds a year for his wife. This money is raised by the voluntary contributions of the societies. It is by these likewise that the poor are assisted where the allowance fixed by the laws of the land does not suffice. Accordingly the stewards of the societies in London distribute seven or eight pounds weekly among the poor. 5. Mr. Whitefield is a Calvinist, Messrs. Wesley are n o t ; this is the only material difference between them. And this has continued without any variation ever since Mr. Whitefield adopted those opinions. The consequences of that difference are touched upon in the letter sent two or three years ago to the persons named therein. 6. There are only three Methodist societies in America; one at Philadelphia, one at New York, and one twelve miles from it. There are five preachers there ; two have been at New York for some years ; three are lately gone over. Mr. Whitefield has published a particular account of everything relative to the Orphan House (in Georgia). 7. The most eminent writers against the Methodists are the late Bishop of London (Dr. Gibson), Dr. Church, the Bishop of Gloucester (Dr. Warburton), and Bishop Lavington. Bishops Gibson and Lavington were thoroughly convinced of their mistake before they died. I believe 124 CONCERNING METHODISM Dr. Church was so too. None, I think, but Mr. Perronet has wrote for the Methodists? ' They cannot join with me any longer than they are directed by me.' To an unknown correspondent, Wesley here contends for his own absolute supremacy in Methodism over his preachers, and in its Conference. He had often to do so in these later days when his helpers had apprehended the New Testament principles of church government, had behind them a record of devoted service, and within them as deep a concern for God's work, in their measure, as he had. He had just expelled his godly and gifted preacher Alexander M'Nab* of Bath because he declined to permit Edward Smythe, an Irish clergyman whom Wesley wished ' to preach every Sunday evening in our chapel while he remained in Bath,' to do so.2 [LONDON], January 1780. seem to me not to have well considered the rules of a helper, or the rise of Methodism. It pleased God, by me, to awaken, first my brother and then a few others, who severally desired of me, as a favour, that I would direct them in all things. After my return from Georgia, many were both awakened and converted to God. One, and another, and another of these desired to join with me as sons in the Gospel, to be directed by me, I drew up a few plain rules (observe, there was no Conference in being), and permitted them to join me on these conditions. Whoever, therefore, violates these conditions, particularly that of being directed by me in the work, does ipso facto disjoin himself from me. This Brother M'Nab has done (but he cannot see that he has done amiss); and he would have it a common cause: that is, he would have all the preachers M Y DEAR BROTHER,—You 1 Tyerman, Wesley, vol. iii. p. 303. 2 See p. 91. 125 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS do the same. He thinks ' they have a right to do so.' So they have. They have a right to disjoin themselves from me whenever they please. But they cannot in the nature of the thing join with me any longer than they are directed by me. And what if fifty of the present preachers disjoined themselves ! W h a t should I lose thereby ? Only a great deal of labour and care, which I do not seek, but endure, because no one else either can or will. You seem likewise to have quite a wrong idea of a Conference. For above six years after my return to England, there was no such thing. I then desired some of my preachers to meet me, in order to advise, not control me. And you may observe, they had no power at all, but what I exercised through them. I chose to exercise the power which God had given me in this manner, both to avoid ostentation, and gently to habituate the people to obey them when I should be taken from their head. But as long as I remain with them, the fundamental rule of Methodism remains inviolate. As long as any preacher joins with me, he is to be directed by me in his work. Do not you see then, that Brother M'Nab, whatever his intentions might be, acted as wrong as wrong could be ? and that the representing of this as the common cause of the preachers was the way to common destruction ? the way to turn all their heads, and to set them in arms ? I t was a blow at the very root of Methodism. I could not therefore do less than I did. I t was the very least that could be done for fear that evil should spread. I do not willingly speak of these things at all, but I do it now out of necessity, because I perceive the mind of you and some others is a little hurt by not seeing them in their true light.—-I am, your affectionate brother. 126 CONCERNING METHODISM 'Persons who knew no more of saving Souls than of catching Whales. . . . I mourn for poor America.' In this loyal, reasonable letter Wesley pleads with the Bishop of London, the eminent Dr. Robert Lowth (17101787), to ordain one of his preachers to minister to Methodists in America. He and Lowth had dined together about three years before at the house of Wesley's valued friend, Ebenezer Blackwell.1 Behind the aged Wesley's pathetic pleadings, as for souls for which he must give an account, were his own missionary experiences in Georgia and Savannah, and his ample present information as to the religious needs of the vast country and the character of the colonial clergy there. He had previously applied to the bishop for a clerical helper and had been refused. The request now preferred met with a like fate. Four years later (1784), at Bristol, whence he sent this letter, Wesley himself, ' with Thomas Coke and James Creighton, presbyters of the Church of England,"' gave presbyterial ordination to two Methodist preachers, Richard Whatcoat and Thomas Vasey, to meet the crying needs of America; and Wesley ordained Coke as superintendent of the great far-spreading work there. 2 To Bishop Lowth, BRISTOL, August 10,1780. M Y LORD,—Some time since I received your Lordship^s favour, for which I return your Lordship my sincere thanks. Those persons did not apply to the Society,3 ' because they had nothing to ask of them.'' They wanted no salary for their minister; they were themselves able and willing to maintain him. They therefore applied, by me, to your Lordship, as members of the Church of England, and 1 See below, p. 289. See A New History of Methodism, vol. i. p. 231. * The Society for Propagating Christian Knowledge in Foreign Parts 5 ; see p. 259. 2 3 127 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS desirous so to continue, begging the favour of your Lordship, after your Lordship had examined him, to ordain a pious man who might officiate as their minister. But your Lordship observes, ' There are three ministers in that country already.'' True, my Lord : but what are three to watch over all the souls in that extensive country ? Will your Lordship permit me to speak freely ? I dare not do otherwise. I am on the verge of the grave, and know not the hour when I shall drop into it. Suppose there were threescore of those missionaries in the country, could I in conscience recommend these souls to their care ? Do they take any care of their own souls ? If they do (I speak it with concern !) I fear they are almost the only missionaries in America that do. My Lord, I do not speak rashly : I have been in America; and so have several with whom I have lately conversed. And both I and they know what manner of men the far greater part of these are. They are men who have neither the power of religion nor the form ; men that lay no claim to piety nor even decency. Give me leave, my Lord, to speak more freely still: perhaps it is the last time that I shall trouble your Lordship. I know your Lordship's abilities and extensive learning: I believe, what is far more, that your Lordship fears God. I have heard that your Lordship is unfashionably diligent in examining the candidates for holy orders; yea, that your Lordship is generally at the pains of examining them yourself. Examining them ! In what respects ? Why, whether they understand a little Latin and Greek, and can answer a few trite questions in the science of divinity ! Alas, how little does this avail! Does your Lordship examine whether they serve Christ or Belial ? whether they love God or the world ? whether they ever had any serious thoughts about heaven or hell ? whether they have any real desire to save their own souls, or the souls of others ? If not, what 128 CONCERNING METHODISM have they to do with holy orders ? And what will become of the souls committed to their care ? My Lord, I do by no means despise learning: I know the value of it too well. But what is this, particularly in a Christian minister, compared to piety ? What is it in a man that has no religion? ' A s a jewel in a swine's snout.'' Some time since I recommended to your Lordship a plain man, whom I had known above twenty years, as a person of genuine piety and of unblameable conversation. But he neither understood Greek nor Latin; and he affirmed, in so many words, that he believed that it was his duty to preach, whether he was ordained or no. I believe so too. What became of him since, I know n o t ; but I suppose he received Presbyterian ordination ; and I cannot blame him if he did. He might think any ordination better than none. I do not know that Mr. Hoskins 1 had any favour to ask of the Society. He asked the favour of your Lordship to ordain him, that he might minister to a little flock in America. But your Lordship did not see good to ordain him. But your Lordship did see good to ordain, and send into America, other persons who knew something of Greek and Latin, but who knew no more of saving souls than of catching whales. In this respect also I mourn for poor America; for the sheep scattered up and down therein. Part of them have no shepherds at all, particularly in the northern colonies; and the case of the rest is little better, for their own shepherds pity them not. They cannot; for they have no pity on themselves. They take no thought or care about their own souls. Wishing your Lordship every blessing from the Great Shepherd and Bishop of Souls, I remain, My Lord, Your Lordship's dutiful son and servant. 1 1 See below, p. 259. 129 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS In these two new letters to John Valton, one of his preachers, Wesley maintains his personal supremacy, and then that of the annual Conference, to which he summoned whom he would, to appoint the preachers. Trustees were not allowed to place or displace them. ' T h e case** here referred to was that of the chapel at Birstal, Yorkshire, the trustees of which maintained their right to do so. The letter to the Dewsbury trustees, which follows these, fixed the annual Conference in Methodism as the supreme court in regard to her preachers. This was vital to the Connexional system.1 ' The Question is, Methodism or no Methodism.' To John Valton. ST. NEOTS, December 3, 1782. are thoroughly satisfied that there is nothing wherein conscience is not concerned, which I would not do for your sake. But here conscience is very deeply concerned. ' W h a t I do, I do unto the Lord.' The question is, in the last resort, Methodism or no Methodism? A blow is struck at the very roots of our whole discipline, as appears by the short state of the ' case' which I have sent to Joseph Benson. And if this work is not obviated while I live, probably it never will be. None can stem the tide when I am gone; therefore I must now do what I can, God being my helper. And I know the fierceness of man shall turn to his praise !—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—You ' Should Trustees place and displace Preachers ?' To John Valton. LONDON, January 16, 1783. Here are two questions. 1. Whether I have acted right ? I answer, No. I ought to MY DEAR BROTHER, — 1 ISO Tyerman, Wesley^ vol. iii. p. 373. CONCERNING METHODISM have resolutely withstood all importunity. % Whether trustees should place and displace preachers? (This is the essential question.) I say ' No,1 again; otherwise^ intolerable consequences will follow.—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. Pray send my love to George Brown and tell him I have his letter. ' By whom shall the Preachers be judged ? To the trustees of Dewsbury chapel. LONDON, July 30, 1788. M Y DEAR BRETHREN,—The question between us i s , ' By whom shall the preachers sent, from time to time, to Dewsbury be judged ?' You say, ' By the trustees.** I say, 6 By their peers—the preachers met in Conference.'' You say, 'Give up this, and we will receive them.'' I say, ' I cannot, 1 dare not, give up this.' Therefore, if you will not receive them on these terms, you renounce connection with your affectionate brother. ' I leave these my last Words with you.' When time had shaken the aged Wesley by the hand, to use his own striking phrase, he enrolled in Chancery a Deed of Declaration (Feb. 28, 1784) constituting a Conference of one hundred of his preachers, to continue his relation to Methodism and all his preachers. The Conference in its successors, in several communities and many lands, was destined to become a Church court of unique authority and influence. As Wesley had almost two hundred preachers, the selection now made aroused jealousies and fears. Hence this famous letter. Perhaps he recalled cases like that of Alexander M'Nab (page 126). He lived almost six years after preparing this message. I t was read at the Conference after his death (1791), when it was unanimously resolved ' That all the preachers that are in full connexion with them shall 131 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS enjoy every privilege that the members of the Conference enjoy, agreeably to the above-written letter of our venerable deceased Father in the Gospel.' To the Methodist Conference. CHESTER, April 7, 1785. M Y DEAR BRETHREN,—Some of our travelling preachers have expressed a fear that, after my decease, you would exclude them either from preaching in connexion with you, or from some other privileges which they now enjoy. I know no other way to prevent such inconvenience than to leave these my last words with you. I beseech you, by the mercies of God, that you never avail yourselves of the Deed of Declaration to assume any superiority over your brethren; but let all things go on among those itinerants who choose to remain together exactly in the same manner as when I was with you, so far as circumstances will permit. In particular, I beseech you, if you ever loved me, and if you now love God and your brethren, to have no respect of persons in stationing the preachers, in choosing children for Kingswood School, in disposing of the yearly contribution, and the Preachers"' Fund, or any other public money: but to do all things with a single eye, as I have done from the beginning. Go on thus, doing all things without prejudice or partiality, and God will be with you even unto the end. ' Your Lordship leaves the Methodists only this Alternative, Leave the Church or starve.' This dilemma still confronted Wesley's followers, although Methodism had been established fifty years. They must starve at the meagre, lifeless services of the Church of England, or be expelled from the Church if they went to the supplementary and complementary services of Methodism 132 CONCERNING METHODISM which they loved. Little wonder that they chose to leave the Church, and that those who had never been within it declined to enter. Modern Anglican historians show by every token regret at the attitude and conduct of their Church in this day of her visitation. The Methodists were in a cleft stick. Many did not wish to ally themselves with their natural congeners in principle, Nonconformists and Dissenters ; yet they wanted, they needed their own separate services. They had no legal protection in these except by the Toleration Act for Religious Dissenters. In deference to Wesley's wish as a Churchman, they long delayed to avail themselves of this provision. This left them exposed to brutal, sometimes almost fiendishly ingenious, and longcontinued persecution.1 Three years before this letter, however, Wesley advised that all his chapels and preachers should be licensed, as he here says—the preachers simply as preachers of the Gospel. Wesley was now eighty-seven and venerated and beloved. The Methodists numbered seventy thousands in England. It seems almost incredible that with his and their shining records a letter like this was needed. To the Bishop of .2 HULL, June 26, 1790. M Y LORD,—It may seem strange that one who is not acquainted with your Lordship should trouble you with a letter, but I am constrained to do it. I believe it is my duty both to God and your Lordship ; and I must speak plain, having nothing to hope or fear in this world, which I am on the point of leaving. The Methodists in general, my Lord, are members of the 1 Mr. Birrell's references above, p. 21, must be supplemented by Lecky's account in loc, in his History of England in the Eighteenth Century. A study of contemporary records is behind the summaries given in A New History of Methodism, vol. i. p. 323-30. 2 Wesley did not publish the name of this bishop, nor that of him to whom he sent the letter next given. 133 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Church of England. They hold all her doctrines, attend her service, and partake of her sacraments. They do not willingly do harm to any one, but do what good they can to all. To encourage each other herein, they frequently spend an hour together in prayer and mutual exhortation. Permit me then to ask, Cui bono ? * For what reasonable end ' would your Lordship drive these people out of the Church ? Are they not as quiet, as inoffensive, nay, as pious, as any of their neighbours ? except perhaps here and there a harebrained man who knows not what he is about. Do you ask, 4 Who drives them out of the Church ?' Your Lordship does, and that in the most cruel manner, yea, and the most disingenuous manner. They desire a licence to worship God after their own conscience. Your Lordship refuses it, and then punishes them for not having a licence ! So your Lordship leaves them only this alternative, ; Leave the Church, or starve.' And is it a Christian, yea, a Protestant bishop that so persecutes his own flock ? I say persecutes; for it is persecution to all intents and purposes. You do not burn them indeed, but you starve them. And how small is the difference ! And your Lordship does this under colour of a vile, execrable law, not a whit better than that de hceretico comburendo.1 So persecution, which is banished out of France, is again countenanced in England ! O my Lord, for God's sake, for Christ's sake, for pity's sake, suffer the poor people to enjoy their religious, as well as civil, liberty ! I am on the brink of eternity ! Perhaps so is your Lordship too ! How soon may you also be called to give an account of your stewardship to the Great Shepherd and Bishop of our Souls ! May He enable both you and me to do it with joy ! So prays, My Lord, Your Lordship's dutiful son and servant. 1 134 ' Concerning the burning of heretics.' CONCERNING METHODISM ' Think and let think.' Yet another plea for tolerance and Christian charity. I t brought no adequate response. The process of separation of the Methodists from the Church of England, regretfully prepared for by Wesley in his arrangements and provisions, was quickened upon his death, and was, ere long, completed. 1 I t is good to have, almost in his last days, his terse utterance of the catholic, inclusive demand of the human mind in all ages— ; Think and let think. , I t was a favourite motto of his. To the Bishop of'- . Circa 1790-91. M Y LORD,—I am a dying man, having already one foot in the grave. Humanly speaking, I cannot creep long upon the earth, being now nearer ninety than eighty years of age. But I cannot die in peace before I have discharged this office of Christian love to your Lordship. I write without ceremony, as neither hoping nor fearing anything from your Lordship, or from any man living. And I ask, in the name and in the presence of Him to whom both you and I are shortly to give an account, why do you trouble those that are quiet in the land ? those that fear God and work righteousness ? Does your Lordship know what the Methodists are ? that many thousands of them are zealous members of the Church of England, and strongly attached, not only to His Majesty, but to his present ministry? Why should your Lordship, setting religion out of the question, throw away such a body of respectable friends ? Is it for their religious sentiments ? Alas, my Lord ! is this a time to persecute any man for conscience' sake? I beseech you, my Lord, do as you would be done to. You are a man of 1 See above, p. 131. For the stages in the process, see A New History of Methodism, vol. i. pp. 373, 381, 485-89 ; and in the nineteenth century, pp. 64-7, article by Dr. H. B. Workman. 135 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS sense; you are a man of learning; nay, I verily believe (what is of infinitely more value) you are a man of piety. Then think, and let think. I pray God to bless you with the choicest of His blessings.—I am. My Lord, Your Lordship's dutiful son and servant., 136 CHAPTER V TO SOME OF T H E C H I E F METHODIST PREACHERS IT says much for Wesley's character and work that he was able to attach to himself so many helpers. In addition to several clergy of the Church of England who, remaining in their cures or otherwise, did the work of Methodist preachers, Wesley called out six hundred and ninety itinerants. Some of these were men of parts and learning; many of them of much natural ability; all, of rare devotion. Like that of Mazzini to his young Italians, his was the call ' to come and suffer.' He had nothing to offer them, especially at first, but hard fare, incessant labour, dangerous journeyings, contumely, persecution, the probability of a shortened life; but, with him, they had mystic Meat to eat which some know not of; they drank of the Brook by the Way, and they knew the rapture of service. Wesley was their chief everywhere and always. Natural primacy, unique labours, and ever-growing popularity kept him enthroned. This permitted counsels, commands, demands, discipline, promotions, degradings and dismissals, as in these letters. A charmed life among moving accidents and incidents by flood and field and wild mobs inspired awe towards him in the earlier days. In the later, this grew into loving reverence which truly styled him, c Our Venerable Father in the Gospel.' His eminence could not be challenged. Like Napoleon at his best, he could do the work of several of his generals. All over the country spread stories of his triumphs, which confirmed the records given in the instalments of his Journal, < Between five and six I called upon 137 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS all that were present (about three thousand) at Stanley, on a little green, near the town, to accept Christ. I was strengthened to speak as I never did before, and continued speaking near two hours; the darkness of night and a little lightning not lessening the number, but increasing the seriousness of the hearers.' Again, ; In the midst of a mob, I called for a chair; the winds were hushed, and all was calm and still; my heart was filled with love, my eyes with tears, and my mouth with arguments. They were amazed. They were ashamed. They were melted down. They devoured every word.' Here we give letters to John William Fletcher, Duncan Wright, Christopher Hopper, Joseph Benson, Samuel Bradburn, Robert Carr Brackenbury, Adam Clarke, and Thomas Coke. Letters to John Fletcher. Besides the Rev. Vincent Perronet, M. A.,vicar of Shoreham, whom Charles Wesley styled the ' Archbishop of Methodists,' William Grimshaw, B.A., vicar of Haworth, Yorkshire, Dr. Thomas Coke, 1 and John William Fletcher,2 vicar of Madeley, Shropshire, were the most distinguished clergymen who closely associated themselves with the Wesleys in the work of Methodism. Of these three mighties, John William Fletcher (Jean Guillaume de la Flechere, 1729-1785) was the mightiest. Indeed, in combination of native ability, scholarly equipment, and Christlike saintliness he was second to none of those who led the Revival of the eighteenth century. He was commonly and rightly styled 'Holy Mr. Fletcher.' Wesley regarded his coming to him as a divine provision: ' when my bodily strength failed and none in England were able and willing to assist me, He sent me help from the mountains of Switzerland.' Wesley and he had been friends eleven years when Wesley sent him this characteristic letter. 1 2 See page 180. The Bible he constantly used in Madeley Church pulpit is in the Library of Drew Theological College, Madison, New Jersey, U.S.A. 138 TO CHIEF PREACHERS ' One had need to be an Angel to converse three or four Hours.' Wesley held a high and serious view of conversation and its possibilities. He noted exactly in his Diary the time he gave to it. A ' weak, washy, everlasting flood' of mere talk, which frothed on and on, he could not bear. Dr. Johnson said, ; John Wesley's conversation is good, but he is never at leisure. He is always obliged to go at a certain hour. This is very disagreeable to a man who loves to fold his legs and have out his talk, as I do.** Letter I. BIRMINGHAM, March 20, 1768. DEAR SIR,—I was told yesterday that you are sick of the conversation even of them who profess religion; that you find it quite unprofitable, if not hurtful, to converse with them three or four hours together; and are sometimes almost determined to shut yourself up, as the less evil of the two. I do not wonder at it at all; especially considering with whom you have chiefly conversed for some time past, namely, the hearers of Mr and Mr . The conversing with them I have rarely found to be profitable to my soul. Rather, it has damped my desires, and has cooled my resolutions; and I have commonly left them with a dry, dissipated spirit. And how can you expect it to be otherwise? For do we not naturally catch their spirit with whom we converse ? And what spirit can we expect them to be of, considering the preaching they sit under? Some happy exceptions I allow ; but, in general, do men gather grapes of thorns ? Do they gather the necessity of inward and outward selfdevotion, of constant, universal self-denial, or of the patience of hope, or the labour of love, from the doctrine they hear ? Do they gather from that amorous way of praying to Christ, 139 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS or that luscious way of preaching His righteousness, any real holiness? I never found it so. On the contrary, I have found that even the precious doctrine of salvation by faith has need to be guarded with the greatest care, or those who hear it will slight both inward and outward holiness. I will go a step further. I seldom find it profitable to converse with any who are not athirst for full salvation; and who are not big with earnest expectation of receiving it every moment. Now, you find none of these things among those we are speaking of; but many, on the contrary, who are in various ways, directly or indirectly, opposing this blessed work of God ; the work, I mean, which God is carrying on throughout this kingdom, by unlearned and plain men. You have for some time conversed a good deal with the genteel Methodists. Now, it matters not a straw what doctrine they hear, whether they frequent the Lock, or West Street, if they are as salt which has lost its savour; if they are conformed to the maxims, the spirit, the fashions, and customs of the world. Certainly, then, if you converse much with such persons, you will return less a man than you were before. But were either the one or the other of ever so excellent a spirit, you conversed with them too long. One had need to be an angel, not a man, to converse three or four hours at once, to any good purpose. In the latter part of such a conversation, we shall be in great danger of losing all the profit we had gained before. But have you not a remedy for all this in your hands ? In order to converse profitably, may you not select a few persons who stand in awe of Him they love; persons who are vigorously working out their salvation; who are athirst for full redemption, and every moment expecting it, if not already enjoying it ? 140 TO CHIEF PREACHERS Though it is true, these will generally be poor and mean, seldom possessed of either riches or learning, unless there be now and then one of higher rank ; if you converse with such as these, humbly and simply, one hour at a time, with earnest prayer for a blessing; you will not complain of the unprofitableness of conversation, or find any need of turning hermit. Do you not observe that all the lay preachers who are connected with me are maintainers of general redemption ? And it is undeniable that they are instrumental of saving souls. God is with them, and He works by them, and has done so for near these thirty years. Therefore, the opposing them is neither better nor worse than fighting against God. —I am, your ever affectionate brother. 6 Thou art the Man !' Wesley regarded Fletcher as his divinely appointed successor. Comparing him with his beloved early helper and friend Whitefield, Wesley held that Fletcher 'had a far more striking person; equal good breeding; an equally winning address; together with a richer flow of fancy; a stronger understanding; a far greater treasure of learning, both in languages, philosophy, philology, and divinity ; and above all, a more deep and constant communion with the Father, and with the Son Jesus Christ/ Charles Wesley would not and could not lead the Methodists. Wesley here claims Fletcher for that service; for he could ' never believe it was the will of God that such a burning and shining light should be hid under a bushel. No ; instead of being confined to a country village, it ought to have shone in every corner of our land.' Madeley, Shropshire, of which Fletcher was vicar, should give its treasure to enrich England. Letter II. [LONDON^] January, 1773. an amazing work has God wrought in these kingdoms, in less than forty years 1 And it not only 141 DEAR SIR,—What JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS continues, but increases, throughout England, Scotland, and Ireland; nay, it has lately spread into New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Maryland, and Carolina. But the wise men of the world say, ' When Mr. Wesley drops, then all this is at an end!' And so it surely will, unless, before God calls him hence, one is found to stand in his place. For, Ovic ayaOov TroXvtcoipavirj. EZ9 Koipavo? eorco.1 I see more and more, unless there be one 7r/)6ecrG>?,2 the work can never be carried on. The body of the Preachers are not united. Nor will any part of them submit to the rest; so that either there must be one to preside over all, or the work will indeed come to an end. But who is sufficient for these things ? qualified to preside both over the preachers and the people? He must be a man of faith and love, and one that has a single eye to the advancement of the kingdom of God. He must have a clear understanding; a knowledge of men and things, particularly of the Methodist doctrine and discipline; a ready utterance; diligence and activity, with a tolerable share of health. There must be added to these, favour with the people, with the Methodists in general. For unless God turn their eyes and their hearts towards him, he will be quite incapable of the work. He must likewise have some degree of learning; because there are many adversaries, learned as well as unlearned, whose mouths must be stopped. But this cannot be done, unless he be able to meet them on their own ground. But has God provided one so qualified ? Who is he ? Thou art the man! God has given you a measure of loving faith; and a single eye to" His glory. He has given you some knowledge of men and things; particularly of the 1 It is not good that the supreme power should be lodged in many hands. Let there be one chief governor. 2 A person who presides over the rest. 14-2 TO CHIEF PREACHERS old plan of Methodism. You are blessed with some health, activity, and diligence ; together with a degree of learning. And to all these, He has lately added, by a way none could have foreseen, favour both with the preachers and the whole people. Come out, in the name of the Lord ! Come to the help of the Lord against the mighty ! Come while I am alive and capable of labour! Dum superest Lachesi quod torqueat, et pedibus me Porto rneiS) nullo dextram subeunte bacillo.1 Come while I am able, God assisting, to build you up in faith, to ripen your gifts, and to introduce you to the people. Nil tanti.2 What possible employment can you have, which is of so great importance ? But you will naturally say, ' I am not equal to the task; I have neither grace nor gifts for such an employment.'' You say true ; it is certain you have not. And who has ? But do you not know Him who is able to give them ? perhaps not at once, but rather day by day. As each is, so shall your strength be. ' But this implies,' you may say, ' a thousand crosses, such as I feel I am not able to bear.'' You are not able to bear them now; and they are not now come. Whenever they do come, will He not send them in due number, weight, and measure ? And will they not all be for your profit, that you may be a partaker of His holiness ? Without conferring, therefore, with flesh and blood, come and strengthen the hands, comfort the heart, and share the labour of,—Your affectionate friend and brother. 1 ' While Lachesis has some thiead of life to spin, And I walk on my own feet, without the help of a staff.' 2 Nothing is of equal consequence with this. JUVENAL, Sat. iii. 27. 143 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS ' T h e People generally are prejudiced in your Favour.' Wesley urges his plea again, doubtless after consulting his intimate friend, Ebenezer Blackwell, a leading London Methodist, from whose house he sent this letter. The Checks to Antinomianism—unfortunate in their title—were Fletcher's defence of Methodists and their teaching against the charges and errors of Calvinists. He is the earliest and best expositor in English of the Remonstrant theology of Jacobus Arminius. Of this, his works are at once a storehouse and an armoury. Letter HI. LEWISHAMJ July 2 1 , 1773. DEAR SIR,—It was a great satisfaction to me, that I had the opportunity which I so long desired, of spending a little time with you. And I really think it would answer many gracious designs of Providence were we to spend a little more time together. I t might be of great advantage both to ourselves and the people, who may otherwise soon be as sheep without a shepherd. You say indeed, ' Whenever it pleases God to call me away, you will do all you can to help them.1 But will it not then be too late ? You may then expect grievous wolves to break in on every side; and many to arise from among themselves, speaking perverse things. Both the one and the other stand in awe of me, and do not care to encounter me ; so that I am able, whether they will or no, to deliver the flock into your hands. But no one else is. And it seems, this is the very time, when it may be done with the least difficulty. Just now the minds of the people in general are, on account of the Checks, greatly prejudiced in your favour. Should we not discern the providential time ? Should we stay till the impression is worn away ? Just now, we have an opportunity of breaking the ice, of making a little trial. Mr. Richardson is desirous of 144 TO CHIEF PREACHERS making an exchange with you, and spending two or three weeks at Madeley. This might be done either now, or in October, when I hope to return from Bristol. And till something of this kind is done, you will not have that crropyi] for the people, which alone can make your labour light in spending and being spent for them. Methinks 'tis pity we should lose any time; for what a vapour is life !—I am, dear Sir, your affectionate friend and brother. * Let Sister Fletcher do as much as she can for God, and no more.' Fletcher's modesty, frail health, and perhaps the feeling that he would probably predecease Wesley, did not allow him to accept Wesley's designation of him as successor. However, Fletcher travelled with him on a preaching tour of twelve hundred miles, and with him 'launched into Christian polities' on the American War. In 1775 he sent a remarkable letter to Wesley, which the latter secretly preserved.1 It outlined a carefully articulated scheme for the development of Methodism, largely upon episcopal lines, after the death of the Wesleys. ' Three or five of the most steady Methodist ministers, under the title of Moderators,' would ordain others, and ' overlook the flocks and the other preachers as Mr. Wesley does now.' In 1781 Fletcher married Miss Mary Bosanquet,2 his equal in saintliness and Methodist service. Wesley wrote the following letter on the happy event. Fletcher died four years later (1785), six years before Wesley. He wrote Fletcher's life, and with extraordinary diligence, working at it fifteen hours a day until completed. He naively said, ' From five in the morning till eight at night are my studying hours; I cannot write longer in a day without hurting my eyes'! Who could, at his age of eighty-three !' 1 2 K Letter, Aug. i, 1775, Rev. J. Telford's John Wesley, p. 388. See p. 358. 145 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS LONDON, November 24, 1781. * is not a person to whom I would have wished Miss Bosanquet joined besides you. But this union, I am thoroughly persuaded, is of God; and so are all the children of God with whom I have spoken. Mr. Bosanquet's being so agreeable to it, I look upon as a token for good; and so was the ready disposing of the house and the stock, which otherwise would have been a great encumbrance. From the first day which you spend together in Madeley, I hope you will lay down an exactly regular plan of living ; something like that of the happy family at Leytonstone. Let your light shine to all that are round about you. And let Sister Fletcher do as much as she can for God, and no more. To His care I commit you both. And am, my dear friends, your very affectionate brother. DEAR SIR,—There To his Stone-mason Preacher, John Nelson. This precious fragment is all that is known of many letters from Wesley to John Nelson (1707-1774). He was one of the early trophies of Wesley's gospel, his valiant follower, companion, and defender, a beloved friend, and a singularly powerful and successful itinerant. The story of Nelson's reformation is a romance comparable with that of Bunyan, and his Journal2 of his life combines much of the interest of Grace Abounding and the Pilgrim's Progress. Like St. Paul, Nelson often worked at his trade, in which he was skilled, while serving as a preacher; for only ten shillings a week was allowed him for himself and family, by the Methodists. 1 The year 1783 given in Works, xi. 149, is an error. The Fletchers went to Madeley in January 1782. 2 Lives of the Early Methodist Preachers, vol. i. ; or Wesley *s Veterans, ed. by Rev. John Telford. 146 TO CHIEF PREACHERS * W e shall cry out together, . . . we are more than Conquerors.' This letter was sent to Nelson while imprisoned in York Castle, after his impressment for the army. Wesley's view of the opportunities of his imprisonment was justified by Nelson's use of them. Lady Huntingdon procured his discharge. To John Nelson. Circa, May 1744. Well, my brother, is the God whom you serve able to deliver you; and do you still find Him faithful to His word ? Is His grace still sufficient for you ? I doubt it not. He will not suffer you to be weary or faint in your mind. But He had work for you to do that you knew not of, and thus His counsel was to be fulfilled. O lose no time ! Who knows how many souls God may by this means deliver into your hands ? Shall not all these things be for the furtherance of the gospel ? And is not the time coming when we shall cry out together, ' Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him that hath loved us ?' Letters to Duncan Wright. Wesley reckoned Duncan Wright (1736-1791) one of his best preachers.1 He often wrote to hearten him, when preaching in Erse to his own countrymen in the Highlands of Scotland. The original of this hitherto unpublished letter is in the library of Drew Methodist Theological Seminary, Madison, New Jersey, U.S.A. < The better p a r t ' here referred to was Wright's choice of Christ, and of the life of a Methodist preacher, instead of that of a soldier. c " Our major, a warm blunderer," thought it a disgrace to have a sergeant-preacher in the regiment.'* Next year Wesley called him to itinerate. 1 See page 124. 147 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS The second letter we give rings like a general's orders. I t might have been written by Wellington, Wesley's remote relative.1 Wesley was much interested in soldiers, especially his soldier-preachers. H e helped Haime, Staniforth, and Bond to be heroes indeed—soldiers and saints, in tent, trench, and battle. ' You . . . will never regret of your Choice.' Letter J. [LONDON], July 4, 1763. have chosen the better part, and will never regret of your choice. Write down the sermon you preached upon that subject, with what additions you see good, and I will correct and print it, if I live to return to London. Perhaps I may likewise print ' The Advice concerning Children' in a separate tract. I am glad Rd. Blackwell goes to Colchester. Perhaps he and you, by turns, may spend the ensuing year in London.—I am, yours affectionately. DEAR DUNCAN,—You ' You and I may speak freely to each other.' Letter LL. LONDON, September 24, 1781. DEAR DUNCAN,—Surely you and I may speak freely to each other; for we love one another. If George Holder goes out, either you must keep his mother or she must go to the workhouse. You must not give an exhortation to the bands, but encourage them to speak. I would be much obliged to you if you would (1) accept the key of the book-room, and immediately take the books into your own care ; (2) clip the wings of the local preachers, 1 Wellington was descended from a collateral branch of the same family as the Wesleys. For many years he styled himself * Arthur Wesley.' 148 TO CHIEF PREACHERS stewards, and leaders, changing them as need requires; (3) fix bands where they are wanting; (4) if James Bogie is willing to remain single, let him travel; (5) do not receive the blind man hastily,^let him be thoroughly tried first ; (6) be of good courage, and conquer everything.—I am, dear Duncan, yours faithfully. Letters to Christopher Hopper. These are of interest as sent to another type of preacher, and as other examples of Wesley's military style. His shrewd comments on men and movements are notable, e.g., the war with America 1 (Letter iv.), and our Lord's millennial reign (Letter v.). Christopher Hopper (17&&-180&) was a pioneer of Methodism in Scotland and elsewhere. No difficulties could drive him back to his comfortable post as schoolmaster. He was aptly styled the tall cedar in the goodly forest of the early preachers, a Boanerges to the stout hearted, a Barnabas to the sorrowful. When Wesley was absent from the Conference of 1780, Hopper had the unique distinction of being appointed to preside over it. Wesley used his clerical abilities and organising skill to remove much of the debt upon the work, and to act as his deputy in critical affairs. Nelson, Manners, and Howell were all preachers. So was Thomas Olivers, now much desired at Newcastle. He was the stout defender of Wesley against the polemics of Toplady and Hill in the Calvinistie controversy, and was more helpful by his hymns, notably that beginning ' The God of Abraham praise/ Wesley here refers to his wife as his ' best friend—in a sense/ ' In God's name, one of you go into that Round.' Letter / . LEEDS, March 24, 1761. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—I stepped over from Manchester hither yesterday, and am to return thither to-morrow. I JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS cannot fix my route through Scotland till I hear from Mr. Gillies; but I expect to be at Aberdeen in four or five weeks, and at Newcastle about the middle of May. My best friend (such she undoubtedly is, in a sense) remains still in London. I do not expect any change till the approach of death, and I am content. With regard to me, all is well. John Nelson and John Manners both write to me from York, that they wish T. Olivers to spend some time longer in the Newcastle circuit. I wish so too. I think it would be better for himself, and for many others. O let us follow after the things that make for peace !—I am, yours affectionately. Alas! alas ! So poor Jacob Rowell says, Mr. Wesley has nothing to do with his round; and all the societies in it, but Barnard Castle, are willing to separate. In God's name, let one of you go into that round without delay ! 6 Do just as I would do if I were in your Place.' Hopper was now at Newcastle-on-Tyne. Here was Wesley's northern centre, with his preachers' hostel and seminary, and an orphanage. ' Public affairs' were Pitt's resignation a few months earlier, and the war with Spain. Letter II. NORWICH, January 18, 1762. MY DEAR BROTHER,—Public affairs do look exceeding dark; and the clouds gather more and more. Yet the Lord sitteth above the waterfloods, and remaineth a King for ever. And He (whatever be the lot of His enemies) shall give His people the blessing of peace. If you do not establish good order in the Orphan House, it is pity you should go there. This is the very design of 150 TO CHIEF PREACHERS your Master; for this end are you sent. Do just as I would do in every instance if I were in your place. Act just the thing that is right, whoever is pleased or displeased. I hereby give it under my hand, I will stand by you with all my might. I am glad you have had a free conversation with T. Olivers. There is good in him; though he is a rough stick of wood. But love can bow down the stubborn neck. By faith and love we shall overcome all things. Peace be with you and yours.—I am, your ever affectionate brother. I set out for London to-morrow. 6 Pray dispatch Letters. and a ready Pen.' You have a ready Mind, The debt on Methodist chapels was now almost ^l^OOO. 1 He asked t h e . help of ' the chief men in our society' to pay it—a thousand to pay two guineas each, another thousand a guinea and a half, and so on in lesser sums. This proposal and scheme seem to have been Hopper's. In the Everett Collection is a copy of Wesley's printed circular letter on this debt, dated ' London, November 84, 1767.' I t says that a few days before he had received ' a Letter from a Gentleman' which he subjoins, signed ' A. H.' These initials the Rev. N. Curnock thinks stand for Assistant Hopper. Writing to the latter on the debt, Wesley said, 6 See how nearly we have adopted your scheme before we saw it.' Then comes the bugle-call and general's order which we give. Hopper was later appointed Conference clerk for this debt scheme (1769). In the circular letter before us, addressed to his friend Richard Cawley of Alpraham, Cheshire, Wesley follows his written signature with the postcript, 6 I shall expect a line from you.' This he received, and two guineas for the debt. 1 See page 218, in the Letters to James Oddie. 151 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Letter III. Circa August, 1767. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—I constitute you, Christopher Hopper by name, Lord President of the north. Enter upon your province, Northumberland, Cumberland, Westmoreland, Durham, Yorkshire, and Lincolnshire without delay. Pray dispatch letters to Jacob Rowell, Jo. Heslop, Richard Boardman, and your other deputies without loss of time; and quicken them to put forth all their strength, and make one push for all. But hold! John Fenwick writes to me, ' I will give £%5 !' Do not abate him the five! No drawing back! I think the time is come for rolling this reproach from us. Your thought concerning the preachers is a noble one. If fifty of them set such an example, giving a little out of their little, such an instance would have an effect upon many. Let one stir up another. Spare no pains. Write east, west, north, and south. You have a ready mind, and a ready pen; and it cannot be used in a better cause. ' Cut off all other Connexion with them than we have with Holland or Germany.' Wesley's rash judgement here as to Britain and her American colonies was modified afterwards, as shown on page 473. Letter IV. LONDON, December 2Q, 1775. M Y DEAR BROTHER,-—I see no possibility of accommoda- tion. The one point is, Has the supreme power a right to tax, or not ? If they have, they cannot, they ought not, to give it up. But I say as Dean Tucker, ' Let them drop.*' Cut off all other connexion with them than we have with Holland or Germany. Four-and-thirty millions they have 152 TO CHIEF PREACHERS cost us to support them since Queen Anne died. Let them cost us no more. Let them have their desire, and support themselves. You sent Harry Brooke one book ; but I left two, the larger of which was not sent. If it is lost, I must buy another. The disorder is universal throughout Great Britain and Ireland ; but hitherto, scarce any die of it in London: so God lightly afflicts us at first. I t is well if the people will now bear the rod, and Him that hath appointed it.—I am, with love to S[ister] Hopper, your affectionate friend and brother. ' These Calculations are far above, out of my Sight.' This hitherto undated letter is copied from the original in the Rylands Library, Manchester. Wesley, now eightyfive, has still only one thing to do. As at Bradford, Yorkshire, a month earlier, he is now welcomed to the churches to preach, and his utterances on any subject are regarded by all as of importance. Letter V. [NEWCASTLE-ON-TYNE], June 3, 1788. said nothing, less or more, in Bradford church, concerning the end of the world, neither concerning my own opinion, but what follows:—That Bengelius had given it as his opinion, not that the world would then end, but that the millennial reign of Christ would begin in the year 1836. I have no opinion at all upon the head: I can determine nothing at all about it. These calculations are far above, out of my sight. I have only one thing to do—to save my soul, and those that hear me.—I am, yours affectionately. 158 MY DEAR BROTHER,—I JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Letters to Joseph Benson. After serving as classical tutor at Wesley's School, Kingswood, Bristol (Letter i.), and as master at Lady Huntingdon's Trevecca College, Joseph1 Benson (1748-1821) was called by Wesley into his itinerancy in 1771. He was to serve Methodism fifty years as preacher and official editor, and twice as President of Conference. His learning blended finely with his evangelism. Thousands were brought to religious decision under his appeals. Said one who often heard him, 'Benson could knock a sinner down with a quotation from the Greek New Testament.' Wesley's many letters to him have features all their own: choice epigrams, discriminating judgements, succinct statements of truth, close personal touches. ' An Ounce of Love is worth a Pound of Knowledge.' Here Wesley, master of the disputations when at Oxford, resumes his office to help and guide Benson and Peter Price at Kingswood School (Letters i. and n.). We see the logician's method and thoroughness. Thus he planned for the boys, for advanced studies by the masters, and for his preachers. He was a true bookman, too, and went to book sales. What a priceless counsel he gives at the close of Letter i. to bookmen and to all! Letter I. WYCOMBE_, November 7, 1768. DEAR JOSEPH,—You have now twenty more volumes of the Philosophical Transactions. Dr. Burton's Latin and Greek poems you have in the study. Malebranche, and some other books, are coming. Logic you cannot crack without a tutor; I must read it to Peter and you, if we live to meet. I t would not be amiss if I had a catalogue of the books at Kingswood; then I should know the better what 154 TO CHIEF PREACHERS to buy. As fast as I can meet with them at sales I shall procure what are yet wanting. But beware you be not swallowed up in books. An ounce of love is worth a pound of knowledge.—I am, dear Joseph, your affectionate brother. * Interposing other Books is not good Husbandry.' Letter II. SHOREHAM, December 22, 1768. M Y DEAR JOSEPH,—You do not quite take my meaning yet. When I recommend to any one a method or scheme of study, I do not barely consider this or that book separately, but in conjunction with the rest. And what I recommend I know; I know both the style and sentiments of each author; and how he will confirm or illustrate what goes before, and prepare for what comes after. Now, supposing Mr. Stonehouse, [James] Roquet, 1 or any other, to have ever so great learning and judgement, yet he does not enter into my plan. He does not comprehend my views, nor keep his eye fixed on the same point. Therefore, I must insist upon it, the interposing other books between these, till you have read them through, is not good husbandry. It is not making your time and pains go as far as they might go. If you want more books, let me recommend more, who best understand my own scheme. And do not ramble, however learned the persons may be that advise you so to do. This does indulge curiosity, but does not minister to real improvement, as a stricter method would do. N o ; you would gain more clearness and strength of judgement by reading those Latin and Greek books (compared with which most of the English books are whipped syllabub) than by four score modern books. I have seen the proof, as none of your Bristol friends 1 Another classical master at Kingswood. 155 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS have done, or can do. Therefore, I advise you again, keep to your plan (though this implies continual self-denial), if you would improve your understanding to the highest degree of which it is capable.—I am, dear Joseph, your affectionate brother. ' I was never afraid of any but the almost Christians.' ' A n Almost Christian,'' ' a n Altogether Christian," and ' a Bible Christian,' are favourite phrases with Wesley. Benson was now thinking of graduating at Oxford, but this was prevented. Kingswood School prospered later, and still prospers. Letter III. CORK, May 27, 1769. DEAR JOSEPH,—You have now (what you never had before) a clear, providential call to Oxford. If you keep a single eye, and have courage and steadiness, you may be an instrument of much good. But you will tread on slippery ground; and the serious persons you mention may do you more hurt than many others. When I was at Oxford, I never was afraid of any but the almost Christians. t If you give way to them and their prudence a hairVbreadth, you will be removed from the hope of the gospel. If you are not moved, if you tread in the same steps which my brother and I did, you may be a means, under God, of raising another set of real Bible Christians.1 How long the world will suffer them (whether longer than they did us or not) is in God's hand. With regard to Kingswood School, I have one string more. If that breaks, I shall let it drop. I have borne the burden one and twenty years; I have done what I could. 1 Later, a devoted body of Methodists actually bore this beautiful name (1815-1907), until they merged in the United Methodist Church. 156 TO CHIEF PREACHERS Now, let some one else do more.—I am, dear Joseph, your affectionate brother. 6 They will find Fault because I say it.5 Wesley's sharp summary of the warped judgements of his opponents is parallel to Burke's condemnation of his : 4 They are willing for anything to be done—providing they do it.' Benson was at Trevecca College, Wales, and found Calvinistic teaching so pronounced and unacceptable that, with John Fletcher, then Principal, he resigned connection with it, and opposed Lady Huntingdon's views. Wesley thought that passion, prejudice, emotion, were strongly at work in the representatives of her Ladyship, and that they often are everywhere. The aged rector of Epworth told him that, long before. In this and Letter v. Wesley distinguishes Methodist doctrine on holiness from what is known as Keswick teaching. Letter IV. October 3, 1770. DEAR JOSEPH,—You need no apology for your writing ; the more frequently and freely you write, the better. I cannot doubt but your neighbour means well; but he is a thorough enthusiast, and has hardly one clear conception of anything, natural or spiritual. Mr. Beard, from Aberdeen, and Mr. Wootton (our new writing master, a man of an excellent spirit) are at Kingswood. But does Mr. J. know the price ? Sixteen pounds a year. Does he know the rules of the school? Again, of what age are the children? I will take none that is above nine years old : now, especially ; because I will not have our children corrupted; nine of whom, together with our three maid-servants, have just now experienced a gracious visitation, and are rejoicing in a pardoning God. I am glad you had the courage to speak your mind on so 157 BRISTOL, JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS critical an occasion. A t all hazards, do so still; only with all possible tenderness and respect. She is much devoted to God, and has a thousand valuable and amiable qualities. There is no great fear that I should be prejudiced against one whom I have known intimately for these thirty years. And I know what is in man ; therefore, I make large allowance for human weaknesses. But what you say is exactly the state of the case. They are 'jealous of their authority."' Truly there is no cause : Longe mea discrepat illi et vox et ratio.1 I fear and shun, not desire, authority of any kind. Only when God lays that burden upon me, I bear it, for His and the people's sake. ' Child,' said my father to me, when I was young, 4 you think to carry everything by dint of argument. But you will find, by and by, how very little is ever done in the world by clear reason.' Very little indeed! It is true of almost all men, except so far as we are taught of God: e Against experience we believe, W e argue against demonstrations ; Pleased while our reason we deceive, And set our judgement by our passions.' Passion and prejudice govern the world; only under the name of reason. I t is our part, by religion and reason joined, to counteract them all we can. It is yours, in particular, to do all that in you lies, to soften the prejudices of those that are round about you, and to calm the passions from which they spring. Blessed are the peacemakers ! You judge rightly : perfect love and Christian liberty are the very same thing; and those two expressions are equally proper, being equally scriptural. ' Nay, how can you and they mean the same thing ? They say, you insist on holiness in the creature, on good tempers, and sin destroyed.' Most surely. And what is Christian liberty, but another word 1 158 Far different are my thoughts and strain.—HORACE. TO CHIEF PREACHERS for holiness ? And where is this liberty or holiness, if it is not in the creature ? Holiness is the love of God and man, or the mind which was in Christ. Now, I trust, the love of God is shed abroad in your heart, by the Holy Ghost which is given unto you. And if you are holy, is not that mind in you which was also in Christ Jesus ? And are not the love of God and our neighbour good tempers ? And so far as these reign in the soul, are not the opposite tempers, worldly-mindedness, malice, cruelty, revengefulness, destroyed? Indeed, the unclean spirit, though driven out, may return and enter again; nevertheless, he was driven out. I use the word destroyed, because St, Paul does. Suspended I cannot find in my Bible. ' But they say, you do not consider this as the consequence of the power of Christ dwelling in us.' Then what will they not say ? My very words are, ' None feel their need of Christ, like these; none so entirely depend upon Him. For Christ does not give light to the soul separate from, but in and with, Himself. Hence His words are equally true of all men, in whatever state of grace they are : ' A s the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye except ye abide in Me. Without (or separate from) Me, ye can do nothing/ For our perfection is not like that of a tree, which flourishes by the sap derived from its own root; but like that of a branch which, united to the vine, bears fruit; but severed from it, is ' dried up and withered.' At length, veris vincor1 I am constrained to believe (what I would not for a long time) these are not the objections of judgement, but of passion; they do not spring from the head, but the heart. Whatever, I say it will be all one. They will find fault, because I say it. There is implicit envy at my power (so called), and a jealousy rising therefrom. Hence prejudice in a thousand forms; hence 1 I am constrained by the force of truth. 159 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS objections springing up like mushrooms. And while those causes remain, they will spring up whatever I can do or say. However, keep thyself pure; and then there need be no strangeness between you and, dear Joseph, your affectionate brother. ' One Point hold fast: Let neither Men nor Devils tear it from you.' This point was that Benson was a child of God. The thoughtful scholar and growing theologian was, like Bishop Joseph Butler even on his death-bed, humbly diffident about his acceptance with God. Earnestly and wisely Wesley deals with him, and meanwhile defines Christian teaching. Letter V. LONDON, December 28, 1770. DEAR JOSEPH,—What a blessing it is, that we can speak freely to each other, without either disguise or reserve I So long as we are able to do this, we may grow wiser and better every day. One point I advise you to hold fast, and let neither men nor devils tear it from you. You are a child of God ; you are justified freely, through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus. Your sins are forgiven ! Cast not away that confidence, which hath great recompense of reward. Now, can any be justified, but by faith? None can. Therefore you are a believer; you have faith in Christ; you know the Lord ; you can say, ' My Lord and my God.' And whoever denies this, may as well deny that the sun shines at noonday. ( Yet still ten thousand lusts remain. And vex your soul^ absolved from sin; Still rebel nature strives to reign-, And you are all unclean_, unclean !' This is equally clear and undeniable. 160 And this is not only TO CHIEF PREACHERS your experience, but the experience of a thousand believers beside, who yet are sure of God's favour, as of their own existence. To cut off all doubt on this head, I beg you to give another serious reading to those two sermons,' Sin in Believers,' and the ' Repentance of Believers.' ' But, is there no help ? Is there no deliverance, no salvation from this inbred enemy ? ' Surely there is ; else many great and precious promises must fall to the ground. ' I will sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean; from all your filthiness and all your idols will I cleanse you.' 6 1 will circumcise thy heart' (from all sin),' to love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul.' This I term sanctification (which is both an instantaneous and a gradual work) or perfection, the being perfected in love, filled with love, which still admits of a thousand degrees. But I have no time to throw away in contending for words; especially where the thing is allowed. And you allow the whole thing which I contend for; an entire deliverance from sin, a recovery of the whole image of God, the loving God with all our heart, soul, and strength. And you believe God is able to give you this; yea, to give it you in an instant. You trust He will. O hold fast this also; this blessed hope, which He has wrought in your heart! And with all zeal and diligence confirm the brethren—(1) in holding fast that whereto they have attained; namely, the remission of all their sins, by faith in a bleeding Lord : (£) in expecting a second change, whereby they shall be saved from all sin, and perfected in love. If they like to call this < receiving the Holy Ghost,' they may. Only the phrase, in that sense, is not scriptural, and not quite proper; for they all ' received the Holy Ghost,' when they were justified. God then ' sent forth the Spirit of His Son into their hearts, crying, Abba, Father.' O Joseph, keep close to the Bible, both as to sentiment L 161 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS and expression! Then there will never be any material difference between you and your affectionate brother. 6 To sit still in one Place is neither for the Health of our Souls nor Bodies.' Wesley is determined to maintain his type of itinerating preachers and house-to-house pastors. Neither Scottish ways nor a bookish preacher shall alter it. ' Be zealous and humble; but never be still," Wesley quotes in another letter, and declares, ' While I live, Itinerant Preachers shall be itinerants."* In the busiest of all his busy years he said, ' I find time to visit the sick and the poor, and I must do it if I believe the Bible. These are the marks by which the Great Shepherd will know His sheep."' Wesley's manifold ability and ceaseless labour amazed Benson, as it did all. Next year he was with him. ' I was constantly with him for a week. I had an opportunity of narrowly examining his spirit and conduct; and, I assure you, I am more than ever persuaded, he is a none such. I know not his fellow, first, for abilities, natural and acquired; and secondly, for his incomparable diligence in the application of those abilities to the best of employments. His lively fancy, tenacious memory, clear understanding, ready elocution, manly courage, indefatigable industry, really amaze me.' Letter VI. LONDON, October 23, 1773. wish every one of our preachers, who goes to Scotland, were of the same mind with you. We are not called to sit still in one place; it is neither for the health of our souls nor bodies. Billy Thompson never satisfied me on this head, not in the least degree. I say still, we will have Travelling Preachers in Scotland, or none. The thing is fixed: the manner of effecting it is to be considered. Now, set your wit to this: Find out the TO 162 DEAR JOSEPH,—I TO CHIEF PREACHERS nrm.1 How shall this matter be accomplished ? You did not do well in selling your horse, and thereby laying another bar in the way. Though I am (by the exquisite negligence of my later book-keeper) a thousand pounds worse than nothing, I would have spared a few pounds to have eased that burden. However, you must do as you can. Our preachers shall either travel there, as in England, or else stay in England.—I am, dear Joseph, yours affectionately. ( You are in danger of reading too much.5 Letter VII LONDON^ January 8, 1774. DEAR JOSEPH,—Many persons are in danger of reading too little ; you are in danger of reading too much. Wherever you are, take up your cross, and visit all the society from house to house. Do this according to Mr. Baxter's plan, laid down in the Minutes of the Conference. The fruit which will ensue (perhaps in a short time) will abundantly reward your labour. Fruit also we shall have, even in those who have no outward connexion with us. I am glad you 6 press all believers , to aspire after the full liberty of the children of God. They must not give up their faith in order to do this : herein you formerly seemed to be in some mistake. Let them go on from faith to faith ; from weak faith to that strong faith, which not only conquers but casts out sin. Meantime it is certain, many call themselves believers who do not even conquer sin; who are strangers to the whole inward kingdom of God, and void of the whole fruit of the Spirit. We must not go on at Dunbar in this manner. Rather we must quit the place. For who will pay that debt ? On Tuesday I was under the surgeon's hands, but am 1 The way how to do it. 163 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS now (blessed be G o d ! ) quite recovered.—I am, dear Joseph, yours affectionately. ' Taking Opium is full as bad as taking Drams.' Letter VIIL CHATHAM, November 26, 1776. D E A R J O S E P H , — I f any leader oppose, you see your r e m e d y : p u t another in his place. Nay, if he does n o t j o i n h e a r t and h a n d ; for, ' he t h a t g a t h e r e t h n o t with you scattered.' T h e ' W o r d t o a S m u g g l e r ' is plain and home, and has done much good in these parts. T a k i n g opium is full as b a d as t a k i n g drams. I t equally h u r t s t h e understanding, and is, if possible, more pernicious t o t h e health t h a n even r u m or brandy. None should touch it, if they have t h e least regard either for their souls or bodies. I really t h i n k you are in t h e right. I t is b e t t e r t o help R. W . 1 where he is, t h a n t o b u r d e n t h e Dales with an a d d i tional weight. B u t then what shall we do ? W e have no supernumerary preachers. See if you can do a n y t h i n g with E d w a r d Jackson.—I am, dear Joseph, yours affectionately. 6 That one word, Grace ! ? Letter IX. MANCHESTER^ April 2, 1781. D E A R J O S E P H , — A l t h o u g h our rejoicing is this, t h e testimony of our conscience, t h a t we walk in simplicity and godly sincerity, this no way contradicts,' God forbid t h a t we should glory, save in the Cross of Christ.' In all, and after all, c His passion alone, the foundation we own; And pardon we claim, And eternal redemption in Jesus's name.' 1 164 ? Robert Wilkinson, then at Dundee. TO CHIEF PREACHERS How admirably pardon and holiness are comprised in that one word grace! Mercy and strength ! So are our justification and sanctification woven together. I hope your sermons will do good. But why do not you publish your poems ? I think you can make verses as fast as John Murlin ; yea, indeed, if need were^ stans pede in uno.1 I commend sister Benson for her care of her mother. One can never do too much for a parent.—I am, dear Joseph, your affectionate brother. g I will engage to eat it.' Even grave Benson would surely smile at this. Wesley admitted that George Yard Chapel, Hull, was * well built and elegantly finished; handsome, but not gaudy'; but equal to City Road Chapel, which he himself had built— never! Letter X. [LONDON, December 1787.] DEAR JOSEPH,—I greatly rejoice in the erection of your new preaching house; and in the tokens of the Divine presence with which you and the people were favoured at the opening; but if it be at all equal to the new chapel in London, I will engage to eat it.—I am, yours affectionately. Letters to Samuel Bradburn. A calm, incisive preacher himself, Wesley knew the value of the emotional preacher. Such an one he found in Samuel Bradburn (1759-1816), to whom he sent this letter. The original is in the British Museum. His short life showed he needed the advice here given for Ridel, who became one of Wesley's preachers. Called out by Wesley in 1774, Bradburn became ; the Demosthenes of Methodism.' His wife, Sophia Cooke, suggested to Baikes the scheme for Sunday schools for children, which interested Wesley greatly. 1 Standing on one foot. 165 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS < Tell Brother Ridel not to please the Devil by preaching himself to death.' Letter I. BIRMINGHAM, March 25, 1783. send me good news concerning the progress of the work of GOD in Colne Circuit. I should think Brother Jackson or Sagar might set the heads of the people at Bacup right. Brother Jackson should advise Brother Ridel not to please the Devil by preaching himself to death. I still think, when the Methodists leave the Church of England, GOD will leave them. Every year more and more of the clergy are convinced of the truth, and grow well affected towards us. I t would be contrary to all common sense, as well as to good conscience, to make a separation now.—I am, dear Sammy, your affectionate brother. DEAR SAMMY,—You * H e t h a t made t h e H e a r t can heal the H e a r t . ' Bradburn had the defects of his humorous, oratorical qualities. His excitable nature exposed him to deep grief and, in later years, to regrettable instability. In this letter, from the original in the library of Drew Methodist Theological Seminary, Madison, New Jersey, U.S.A., Wesley consoles him by recalling his own poignant experience. The reference is to his rejection by Miss Hopkey, whom he loved.1 Letter II. LONDON, January 14, 1786. DEAR SAMMY,—It is well we know ' that trouble springeth not out of the dust, but that the Lord reigneth.') But still, even when we can say, It is the Lord, 'tis hard to add. Let Him do what seemeth Him good. I remember formerly, when I read those words in the church at Savannah, 'Son of 1 166 See p. 310, TO CHIEF PREACHERS mart) behold^ I take from thee the desire of thine eyes with a strokef I was pierced through as with a sword, and could not utter a word more. But our comfort is, He that made the heart can heal the heart! Your help stands in Him alone. He will command all these things to work together for good. To His tender care I commend you, and am, dear Sammy, your affectionate friend and brother. Letters to Robert Carr Brackenbury, Wesley often wrote to Robert Carr Brackenbury (17521819), a young gentleman of wealth, culture, and poetic talent, 1 of Raithby Hall, Lincolnshire. There, ' a palace in the midst of a paradise,' Wesley liked to stay. He delighted in Brackenbury's company and friendship. He was appointed as a Methodist preacher for about forty years, irregularly and at intervals. € What is Mine is Yours.' Letter I. BRISTOL, September 27, 1779. hope your stay at will be of use to many. But do not hurt yourself in order to help others. Mr. S is an upright, valuable man. His wife is a jewel indeed. I wish we had many like her. Your being at during this critical time is a singular providence. Both parties have a regard for you; and will hear you when they will not hear each other. I am glad you think of spending the winter in town, and doubt not but it will be for the glory of God. Go to my house, what is mine is yours; you are my brother, my friend; let neither life nor death DEAR SIR,—I 1 His hymn on the Holy Spirit is combined with one by Charles Wesley in Methodist Free Church Hymns. 167 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS divide us! Your visit to N will, I am persuaded, be of considerable use; the more because you love and recommend discipline. But I must beg of you to spend a night or two at Y and at L . The sooner you come the more welcome you will be. Wrap yourself up warm, particularly your head and breast.—I am, your very affectionate friend and brother. I give it under my hand . . . you are welcome to preach in any of our Preaching-houses. Letter IL BRISTOL, March 9,1782. DEAR SIR,—What a comfort it is that we know the Lord reigneth; and that He disposes all things in heaven and earth in the very manner which He sees will be most for His own glory, and for the good of those that love Him ! I am firmly persuaded the present dispensation, severe as it may appear, will be found in the event a means of greater blessing than any you have yet received. Even already you find the consolations of the Holy One are not small with you. And He enables you to make the right use of this providence, by devoting yourself more entirely to His service. On April 4 I expect to be in Manchester, in order to visit the societies in Lancashire, Cheshire, Yorkshire; and thence, if God permit, to Scotland. Perhaps it would be of use if you took part of the journey with me. Let me know your thoughts. I t is exceeding clear to me, first, that a dispensation of the gospel is committed to you; and secondly, that you are peculiarly called to publish it in connexion with us. I t has pleased God t o give so many and so strong evidences of this, that I see not how any reasonable person 168 TO CHIEF PREACHERS can doubt it. Therefore, what I have often said before I say again, and give it under my hand,—that you are welcome to preach in any of our preaching-houses, in Great Britain or Ireland, whenever it is convenient for you. I commend you for preaching less frequently where you find less liberty of spirit (because no necessity is laid upon you with regard to this or that particular place), and for spending most time in those places where you find most probability of doing good. We have need to work while it is day.—I am, dear Sir, your affectionate friend and servant. ' Trust God, and speak as well as you can.' Very tenderly Wesley deals with the frail health of his friend, on account of which Brackenbury travelled to the Channel Islands and to Holland this year (1788). Wesley, then eighty years of age, accompanied him to Holland. This was the veteran's first holiday for forty years. On their return, Brackenbury went again to Guernsey and Jersey with Alexander Kilham x of Epworth, Lincolnshire, as travelling companion and evangelist. Amid much persecution they founded the flourishing Methodism of those islands. Letter III. [LONDON^] January 4, 1783. rejoice to hear that you have had a safe passage, and that you have preached both in Guernsey and Jersey. We must not expect many conveniences at firsts hitherto it is the day of small things. I should imagine the sooner you begin to preach in French the better: as surely you need not be careful about accuracy. Trust God, and speak as well as you can. While those poor sheep were scattered abroad without a DEAR SIR,—I 1 Later he became one of Wesley's preachers, contended for the administration of the sacraments among the Methodists, and for the adoption of the representative principle in their government. With William Thorn he founded the Methodist New Connexion (i 797-1907). 169 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS shepherd, and with no proper connexion with each other, no wonder they were cold and dead. I t is good that every one should know our whole plan. We do not want any man to go on blindfold. Peace be with your spirit! I wish you many happy years, and am, dear Sir, your very affectionate friend and servant. 6 H e calls you not so much to act as to suffer.' Letter IV. [SHOREHAM, KENT,] January 10, 1783. DEAR SIR,—As I expect to remain in London till the beginning of March, I hope to have the pleasure of spending a little time with you before I set out on my spring and summer journeys, which I shall probably continue as long as I live. And who would wish to live for any meaner purpose than to serve God in our generation ? I know my health and strength are continued for this very thing. And if ever I should listen to that siren song, ' Spare thyself,' I believe my Master would spare me no longer, but soon take me away. It pleases Him to deal with you in a different way. He frequently calls you not so much to act as to suffer. And you may well say— c O take Thy way ! Thy way is best; Grant or deny me ease; This is but tuning of my breast To make the music please/ I am glad you are still determined to do what you can, and to do it without delay. But all are not of this mind. I have just received a letter from Mr. , formerly one of our travelling preachers, informing me, whereas it has pleased God to take away his dear partner, he is resolved again to give himself up to the work,—after he has settled 170 TO CHIEF PREACHERS his worldly business, which he thinks will take but sixteen or seventeen months! Would one think he had ever read the Epistle of St. James? or that he had heard those words, ' W h a t is your life? It is even a vapour, which appeareth and vanisheth away.'* Commending you to Him who is able to save you to the uttermost, I am, dear Sir, your affectionate friend and brother. 6 Make the Opportunities that you cannot find/ The year after this letter Wesley's companionship on a month's tour in Holland, for a second time, enforced this counsel upon his friend. He was eighty-three, but he found and made opportunities for incessant work for God and men. Whilst at Amsterdam he wrote the Preface to his Life of Fletcher. Letter V. LONDON, February 15, 1785. having the opportunity of giving them a few discourses in Dover, and then travelling with so pious and friendly a person as Mr. Ireland, 1 I could not but look upon as clear instance of a gracious Providence. I cannot doubt but the mild air which you now breathe will greatly tend to the re-establishment of your health. And so will the suspension of your public labours till you are better able to bear them. With regard to perfecting yourself in the French language, it is certain this may be done more speedily and effectually in a family where only French is spoken. And undoubtedly you may learn the purity of the language far better in Languedoc than in Normandy. It is clear that you are not called at present to any public labours. But should you not be so much the more diligent in private ? to redeem the time ? to buy up every opportunity ? Should you not be DEAR SIR,—Your 1 A valued Bristol friend of Wesley and Fletcher. 171 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS ' instant in season and out of season'; that is, to make the opportunities which you cannot find ? Surely the all-wise and all-merciful Saviour did not send you into France for nothing. Oh no ! you are at least to pluck one brand (perhaps several) out the burning. May the Lord whom you serve in all things direct your paths ! So prays, dear Sir, your affectionate friend and brother. ' I, not you, will judge. 5 Here is Wesley, the general, not to say the autocrat. But what a golden maxim he also here gives his friend: ' I have often repented of judging too severely ; but very seldom of being too merciful.' Letter VI. October 20, 1787. DEAR SIR,—Mr. is undoubtedly a good young man ; and has a tolerably good understanding. But he thinks it better than it is ; and in consequence is apt to put himself in your or my place. For these fifty years, if any one said, 6 If you do not put such an one out of society, I will go out of it ^; I have said, ' Pray go: I, not you, will judge who shall stay.' I therefore greatly approve of your purpose, to give Mr. W a full hearing in the presence of all the preachers. I have often repented of judging too severely; but very seldom of being too merciful. As the point is undoubtedly of very great importance, it deserved serious consideration; and I am glad you took the pains to consider it, and discussed it so admirably well according to Scripture and sound reason. I enclose a few lines for Mrs. , for whom I feel an affectionate concern. The God whom you serve will shortly deliver you from 172 LONDON, TO CHIEF PREACHERS the heaviness you feel.—I ever am, dear Sir, your affectionate friend and brother. 4 This Doctrine is the grand depositum which God has lodged with the people called Methodists.' This, one of Wesley's most memorable statements, is in our closing letter to this friend. Next year the death of Wesley broke their fellowship. Brackenbury took Wesley's appointment at City Road eleven days before Wesley died, and lovingly watched by the aged leader's side when that event occurred. Even then Wesley asked for a pen; but could no longer do as much as he describes in the pretty closing turn of this letter. Letter VII. BRISTOL, September 15, 1790. letter gave me great satisfaction. I wanted to hear where and how you were ; and am glad to find you are better in bodily health, and not weary and faint in your mind. My body seems nearly to have done its work, and to be almost worn out. Last month my strength was nearly gone, and I could have sat almost still from morning to night. But, blessed be God, I crept about a little, and made shift to preach once a day. On Monday I ventured a little farther; and after I had preached three times (once in the open air) I found my strength so restored that I could have preached again without inconvenience. I am glad brother D has more light with regard to full sanctification. This doctrine is the grand depositum which God has lodged with the people called Methodists ; and for the sake of propagating this chiefly He appeared to have raised us up. I congratulate you upon sitting loose to all below ; steadfast in the liberty wherewith Christ has made you free. Moderate riding on horseback, chiefly in the south of 173 DEAR SIR,—Your JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS England, would improve your health. If you choose to accompany me in any of my little journeys on this side Christmas, whenever you was tired you might go into my carriage. I am not so ready a writer as I was once ; but I bless God I can scrawl a little, enough to assure you that I am, dear Sir, your affectionate friend and brother. Letters to Adam Clarke and one to his Wife. The aged Wesley attracted in Adam Clarke (1760-1832) a young Timothy of exceptional scholarly aptitudes, combined with strength and sweetness of character. He became an itinerant in 1782. He was then miserably poor; but happening to turn up half a guinea while gardening at Kingswood School, Bristol, where he waited to be accepted by Wesley as a preacher, he, with the scholar's enthusiasm, handed it to Bayley, a master there, for a copy of the Hebrew grammar which he was then preparing. This was the foundation of Clarke's mastery in Biblical scholarship. He became a Briareus in languages and learning, and was employed as editor and antiquarian by the Government. 1 His Commentary on the whole Bible nourished several generations of Methodists. ' You should not forget French, or anything you have learned.' Wesley was a true humanist in range and catholicity of taste. Any scholar among his friends and preachers, as well as the simplest evangelist, found him a shining example and an appreciative helper. 1 This was in 1808-1818, to complete Rymer's Fcedera for the State Papers Commission. That Wesley would have undertaken such a task weighed much with Clarke. Some brethren thought it was a providential call ; others that it was a trick of the devil to divert him ; others that it would hinder his proper work. As a fact, it helped that; as he was also faithful to all preaching and pastoral duties while he carried four folio volumes through the press. ' I did i t / he said, * for the honour of my God and the credit of my people.' 174 TO CHIEF PREACHERS Letter L LONDON, Feb. 3, 1786. do well in insisting upon full and present salvation, whether men will hear or forbear; as also in preaching abroad, when the weather permits, and recommending fasting, both by precept and example. But you need not wonder that all these are opposed, not only by formalists, but by half-Methodists. You should not forget French, or anything you have learned. I do not know whether I have read the book you speak of. You may send your translation at your leisure. Be all in earnest, and you shall see greater things than these.—I am, my dear Adam, your affectionate brother. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—You ' Wary in choosing Names for our Children.' Wesley was bound to Bristol by strong ties, as many references in this volume show. He wants his friend there. His remark on names is curious. His own name was certainly an 'example' to him. He admired St. John's style of writing most of all; and that apostle's message, ' God is love,' was also Wesley's favourite theme. Letter II. BRISTOL,, March 9, 1789. I should live to see you another Conference, I should be glad to have sister Clarke and you here, rather than at most other places, because I spend more time here myself than at any other place, except London. I am glad to hear that God has raised up so able a preacher from the Islands; 1 but certainly you should spare no pains in teaching him to read and write English. And I do not doubt but if he learned with a single eye, he would be largely strengthened by the blessing of God. DEAR ADAM,—If 1 Probably John de Queteville of Guernsey. Clarke was now at Jersey. 173 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS I t would be a reason for being very wary in choosing names for our children, if that old remark were true— e That our first tempers from example flow, And borrow that example from our names.* Peace be with you and yours!—I am, dear Adam, your affectionate friend and brother. ' " O h , what will the end b e ? " Why, glory to God in the highest.' Surely a prophetic utterance. Many times has that devout exclamation been heard concerning Wesley's work in Ireland. This question and answer make a fine cordial for faltering faith. Clarke was Irish by birth ; but at the Conference at Leeds Wesley did not send him into that 6 strange land,' but to Bristol, as Wesley most wished. While there Clarke's frail health broke down completely. Hence there followed a letter of practical kindness from Wesley to Mrs. Clarke (Letter iv.). Wesley would recall his own case and his recovery at the Hot Wells thirty-six years before. Letter III. Near DUBLIN, June 25., 1789. DEAR ADAM,—You send me good news with regard to the Islands. Who can hurt us, if God is on our side ? Trials may come, but they are all good. I have not been so tried for many years. Every week, and almost every day, I am bespattered in the public papers, either by Mr. Smyth or by Mr. Mann, his curate. Smooth, but bitter as wormwood, are their words ; and five or six of our richest members have left the society, because (they say) ' I have left the Church .^ Many are in tears on account of i t ; and many are terribly frightened, and crying out, ; Oh, what will the end be ?' What will it be ? W h y , ' Glory to God in the highest, peace on earth, and goodwill among men.' 176 TO CHIEF PREACHERS But, meantime, what is to be done ? What will be the most effectual means; to stem this furious torrent ? I have just visited the classes, and find still in the society upwards of a thousand members; and, among these, many as deep Christians as any I have met with in Europe. But who is able to watch over them, that they may not be moved from their steadfastness ? I know none more proper than Adam Clarke and his wife. Indeed, it may seem hard for them to go into a strange land again. Well, you may come to me at Leeds, at the latter end of next month; and if you can show me any that are more proper, I will send them in your stead. That God may be glorified, is all that is desired by, dear Adam, your affectionate friend and brother. ' I think he must do this, or die.5 Letter IV. To Mrs. Adam Clarice. DUMFRIES, June 1, 1790. great question is, What can be done for Adam Clarke ? Now, will you save his life ? Look round; consider if there be any circuit where he can have much rest, and little work ; or shall he and you spend September in my rooms at Kingswood, on condition that he shall preach but twice a week, and ride to the Hot Wells every day ? I think he must do this, or die; and I do not want him (neither do you) to run away from us in haste. You need not be told that this will be attended with some expense; if it be, we can make it easy. I am apt to think this will be the best way. In the meantime, let him do as much as he can, and no more. I t is probable I shall stay with you a little longer, as my strength does not much decline. I travelled yesterday M 177 M Y DEAR SISTER,—The JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS nearly eighty miles, and preached in the evening without any pain. The Lord does what pleases Him. Peace be with all your spirits !—-I am, your affectionate friend and brother. ' The People of Bristol are honest, yet so dull.' A racy letter, with characterisations of cities and folk, and full of shrewdness and optimism. Ailing Adam Clarke would read this with interest after the letter to his wife. What mountains of church debts have been lifted on Wesley's plan ! I t was a development from Captain Foy's. 1 Letter V. [POCKLINGTON,] June 28, 1790. DEAE ADAM,—I often wonder at the people of Bristol. They are so honest, yet so dull, 'tis scarce possible to strike any fire into them. Only with God all things are possible. Many years ago I put the society at Bath into a way wherein, if they had persevered, they would now have owed nothing. They were at Plymouth but thirty in number, and their debt was ^1400. I advised them, let every member subscribe monthly what he can; and a hundred at the dock promised to do the same. * I,' said one, ' will give a crown a m o n t h ' ; ' I,' said another, ' half a crown.' Many subscribed a shilling, sixpence, or threepence a month. And now the debt is paid. I began such a subscription in Bath, as I have done in many places with success. But they left it off in two or three weeks. Why ? Because I gave four guineas to prevent one, that was arrested, from going to jail! Good reason, was it not? 6 Why,' said one and another, ' might he not have given it to me ? ' On Monday four weeks I shall probably set out for Bristol. Peace be with your spirits.—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. 1 178 See p. 300. TO CHIEF PREACHERS ' I followed one rule : You must either bend or break.' Clarke recovered, and at length Wesley sends him to serve for a season in his native land, with a characteristic letter of instructions. Letter VI. September 9, 1790. DEAR ADAM,—Did not the terrible weather that you had at sea make you forget your fatigue by land ? Come, set one against the other, and you have no great reason to complain of your journey. You will have need of all the courage and prudence which God has given you. Indeed, you will want constant supplies of both. Very gently and very steadily, you should proceed between the rocks on either hand. In the great revival at London, my first difficulty was, to bring into temper those who opposed the work ; and my next, to check and regulate the extravagances of those that promoted it. And this was far the hardest part of the work ; for many of them would bear no check at all. But I followed one rule, though with all calmness: ' You must either bend or break.' Meantime, while you act exactly right, expect to be blamed by both sides. I will give you a few directions : 1. See that no prayermeeting continue later than nine at night, particularly on Sunday. Let the house be emptied before the clock strikes nine. 2. Let there be no exhortation at any prayer-meeting. 3. Beware of jealousy, or judging one another. 4. Never think a man is an enemy to the work, because he reproves irregularities. Peace be with you and yours !—I am, dear Adam, your affectionate friend and brother. BRISTOL, 179 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Letters to Thomas Coke. In the light of the results which followed them, these two brief, quiet letters are of profound interest. The first is Wesley's sanction to the formation of the first Methodist foreign missionary society. Broad rivers with streams, making everything live where they come and bearing argosies with portly sail and rich with treasure for earth and heaven, were to flow from the fountain thus unsealed. The least important of these treasures is the vast sum of money raised every year for this work by world-wide Methodism—in round figures £1,500,000 ($7,500,000). Wesley's first notable work was as foreign missionary in Georgia (1735-7). He originated, or caught from Whitefield, a great slogan, worthy to rank with that of Luther at Worms—a charter for novel world-wide work and for every evangelist and missionary: ' I look upon all the world as my parish.''x In 1759 he encouraged Nathaniel Gilbert, sometime Speaker of the House of Assembly in Antigua, to spread the gospel among his slaves and the negroes there. He made a collection in August 1767, at Newcastle-qn-Tyne, ' at the request of Mr. Whitaker of New England, for the Indian schools in America.*' Now he gives authority and his blessing to Coke, who must be regarded as the father of organised Methodist foreign missionary work. He dreamed of Wesley's worldwide parish. Wesley was wiser than Dr. Rylands, who tried to kill Carey's proposal for modern missions by declaring that God would convert the world without his help. Coke dedicated many years of his life, and his fortune also, to this work ; died on his way to India in its interest, and was buried at sea. Thomas Coke, LL.D. (1747-1814), was a gift of Wales to Methodism. Born at Brecon, he was dismissed from the curacy of South Petherton for his Methodistic earnestness, came to Wesley in 1776, and, said the latter,' an union then began which I trust shall never end.' It never did. Coke's 1 See Whitefield's Life by Andrews, and Wesley Hist. Soc. Proceedings, iii. 36. 180 TO CHIEF PREACHERS deep piety, forensic and classical attainment, and social status made him greatly influential in England, especially after Wesley's death. He was diminutive in stature and had a countenance of cherubic beauty. His somewhat strange manner of speech disturbed Wesley. He drew Adam Clarke to the lantern on the upper floor of the New Room at Bristol and listened with him as Coke preached. ' There, Adam,' said Wesley, ' you have heard how the doctor mouths his words.'' The second letter shows Coke, then in Ireland, straining under Wesley's regulations, by some of which he tried to keep the Methodists a mere society in the Church of England. Henry Moore was one of Wesley's chief preachers, and, with Coke, his biographer. Coke was destined to aid the separate organisation of Methodism in England and in America. Of his work there, letters tell in chapter vn. ' Your Proposal to send Missionaries.' Letter L BRISTOL, March 12, 1786. greatly approve of your proposal, for raising a subscription, in order to send missionaries to the Highlands of Scotland, the islands of Jersey and Guernsey, the Leeward Islands, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland. It is not easy to conceive the extreme want there is, in all these places, of men that will not count their lives dear unto themselves, so they may testify the gospel of the grace of God.—I am, dear Sir, your affectionate brother. DEAR SIR,—I ' Thus far only I could go.5 Letter II. GLASGOW, May 16, 1788. came hither this morning. There is a fair opening at Dumfries, and a prospect of much good. I like 181 DEAR SIR,—I JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS your proposal concerning Joseph Cownley, and will talk with him about it if I live to see Newcastle. As I said before, so I say still, I cannot, I dare not, leave the Church, for the reasons we all agreed to thirty years ago in the Conference at Leeds. Thus far only I could go. On condition, that our people would receive the Lord's Supper once a month either at St. Patrick's or their own parish church (the reasonableness of which should be strongly and largely explained),—on this condition, I would allow Henry Moore to read the morning service at Whitefriars on the other Sundays. I wonder at the imprudence of Mr. Edward Smyth, to say nothing of his unkindness. You did well in changing the stewards at Waterford.—I am, dear Sir, yours most affectionately. 182 CHAPTER VI TO ECCENTRIC THOMAS WRIDE, STEADY JOSEPH TAYLOR, AND OTHER METHODIST PREACHERS tact and resourcefulness come out strikingly in his dealings with the rank and file of his preachers. These were of all types. There was Goodman Dull, like John Easton, who, to Wesley's amazement, neither laughed nor cried when he read Wesley's favourite novel, which he abridged for the Methodists—Henry Brooke's Fool of Quality, There was 6 Diotrephes, who loved to have the pre-eminence'; and 'John, whose surname was Mark, who departed' from the work because of its difficulties, and, unlike the nephew of Barnabas, never returned to it. Wesley's good-humour seldom or never failed in dealing with these and many other varieties. He saw instantly the possibilities of a situation and used them. Michael Fenwick complained that, although he travelled with Wesley, he had not figured in the published extracts from his Journal. He had his wish gratified, and more, in the next issue. Wesley so wrote, ' I preached at Clayworth ; I think none was unmoved except Michael Fenwick, who fell fast asleep under an adjoining hayrick.' Another preacher, when with Wesley at the table of a wealthy Methodist, bemoaned the departure of many from the Spartan simplicity of early Methodism. ' My brother,' said Wesley, glancing at the preacher's well-filled plate, ' here is an opportunity for self-denial.' WESLEY'S I Letters to * eccentric Thomas Wride.' Steady and skilful in leadership as were most of his preachers, like Joseph Taylor, it was inevitable that among 183 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS the large number which Wesley employed the eccentric should appear now and again. Such an one was Thomas Wride. Probably none tried Wesley more than he did. He was often officious and exacting as a martinet, and sometimes the embodiment of stupidity. He was suspicious and bitingly sarcastic, and could manage neither himself nor those under him. During the period covered by these letters Wesley was compelled to reduce him in status, and at length to dismiss him. He afterwards restored him, and he died in the work in 1807, sixteen years after Wesley's death. The official record is unusually brief.1 There is much mercy in its omissions, and the loose statement, 6 between thirty and forty years,' is significant:—' Thomas Wride; who laboured in the Christian ministry between thirty and forty years. He was a man of comprehensive mind, and an able preacher; but his singularities of spirit and manners prevented him from being so acceptable and useful as he otherwise might have been. From the testimony of several friends who visited him in his last illness, we conclude that he died in peace.' Why did Wesley so long suffer such a man ? Because he knew that Wride was saving his own soul by this service, that he had real ability and devotion, and that in a field so wide and varied as the Methodist societies there was room for every style of preacher and worker. Moreover Wride had an almost dog-like devotion to Wesley, was punctilious in following his instructions, and Wesley liked liveliness. Dulness tried him. It was most probably with Wride that this colloquy took place. Said Wesley, pointing to a dock weed in the field where they were walking, 'Tommy, touch that.' He did so. ' D o you feel anything?' Wesley asked. 'No,' was the reply. 'Touch that,' said Wesley, pointing this time to a nettle. Tommy did so and was stung. Wesley added, ' Some men are like docks ; say what you will to them, they are stupid. Others, like nettles, resent even a touch. Tommy, you are a nettle; and for my part, I would rather have to do with a nettle than a dock.' 1 Minutes of the Methodist Conferences (1807), octo. edit., 1813, p. 381. 184 TO WRIDE AND OTHERS Of the thirty-one letters to Wride which follow, twentyseven are new to present-day historians and collectors. They are representative of thousands of the brief messages sent by Wesley to his preachers. They cover more than twenty years of a strange, little-known, Methodist preacher's life, allude to some interesting features in the development of Methodism, help to fix points in Wesley's itinerations, 1 and show that he was virtually the superintendent of Wride's, as of every circuit, although he always maintained the authority of his representatives there. They bring out more impressively than any set of his letters Wesley's patience, his frank, faithful dealing with men, and his large exercise of that charity which hopeth and endureth, suffereth long and is kind. ' Labour to be steadily Serious, Weighty in Conversation, and to Walk humbly and closely with God.' Letter I. LONDON, February 14, 1771. we live till August, the matter of David Evans must be thoroughly inquired into. I do not see that you could do anything more with regard to Longtown. The providence of God has remarkably interposed in behalf of the poor people at Whitehaven. I am in hopes there will be more peace among them, and more life than has been for some time. Now, Tommy, you have good encouragement to stir up the gift of God that is in you. Labour to be steadily serious, to be weighty in conversation, and to walk humbly and closely with God.—I am, Your affectionate- friend and brother. DEAR TOMMY,—If 1 E.g. Letter xxiil., p. 199, fills in particulars needed for the Itinerary, Wesley Historical Society Proceedings, p. cxxiii. 185 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS ' L e t all that were of the Church keep to the Church/ Letter II. ARMAGH, June 23, 1771. said before, we will pay the five pounds to brother Littledale at the Conference. If T. Colbeck had done as I ordered, it would have been paid long ago. Then also we will make up what C. Garnet wants. If he desires it, he may come to the Conference in your stead. If not, send your account of things by It. Seed. Will not the yearly subscription pay both those debts ? If there be an overplus, it may lessen the debt on Whitehaven House. I desire that neither any preacher of ours nor any member of our Society would on any pretence go to an Anabaptist meeting. I t is the way to destroy the Society. This we have experienced over and over. Let all that were of the Church keep to the Church.—I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. DEAR TOMMY,—I ' Be zealous, serious, active.5 Letter III. BRISTOL, September 7, 1771. DEAR TOMMY,—The preachers appointed for Whitehaven circuit are John Mason and William Linnell. Jos. Garnet is appointed for Sheffield, and Thomas Wride assistant in the Armagh circuit. Many of the people there are much alive. Probably you may cross over to Newry, which brings you just to the spot. Let C. Mason and Linnell follow the blow at Keswick. I am glad to hear so good an account of John M*Combe. Be zealous, serious, active! Then you will save your own soul and them that hear you !—I am, Your affectionate friend and brother. 186 TO WRIDE AND OTHERS ' Be exact in Everything/ Letter IV, June 30, 1772. DEAR TOMMY,—How poor John Smith has lost himself, and given occasion to the enemy to blaspheme ! I do not see that he can any longer remain with us as a travelling preacher. I t seems his best way would be quietly to return to his business. Tho. Dixon or Jo. Witham may bring over your accounts to the Conference. Be exact in everything!—I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. OTLEY, 6 Suffer none to ride over your Head. be mild!' Only Letter V, COLCHESTER, November 5, 1772. DEAR TOMMY,—You was in the right. Let the allotment for the wives of the preachers (at least for the present) stand as it did before. It seems to me that the alteration made in the travellingplan by bro. M'Nab is wise and well grounded. I advise you to adhere thereto till you see some good reason to the contrary. You are the assistant, not bro. Pepper : you need suffer none to ride over your head. Only be mild! I require John Murray to follow the same plan. If he does not, I will let him drop at once. I suspect the hives to be what we call the nettle rash, I know nothing that helps it but rubbing the part with parsley,—I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. 187 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS * Miss no Congregation, at the Peril of his Life/ Letter VI. SHOREHAM, December 16, 1772. am afraid there is truth in what you say, that poor John Murray has not the work of God at heart, and that he will leave us as soon as he can conveniently. Two things, however, I desire in the meantime: one, that he will miss no congregation, at the peril of his life; the other, that he will preach no more at Terryhoogan on a Sunday morning.—I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. DEAR TOMMY,—I * Pay . . . what is due to him.5 Letter VIL TULLAMOREJ April 15, 1773. pounds lie in John Johnson's hands. Let it be paid into the hands of Ezekiel Saunderson and Jas. Stewart. Let the forms and desk at Belfast be finished immediately. Out of what remains you may pay C. Stewart what is due to him from the society—I suppose about thirty shillings.—I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. DEAR TOMMY,—Six ' Be gentle to all Men.' Letter VIII. LONDON, November 12, 1773. DEAR TOMMY,—The matter is short; I see no reason yet why you should remove from York circuit. Do all the good you can there. Observe and enforce all our rules. 188 TO WRIDE AND OTHERS Exhort all the believers to go on to perfection, and be gentle to all men.—I am, Your affectionate friend and brother. < Were we to engage little Poets, we should be overrun.' Letter IX. LONDON^ January 22, 1774. DEAR TOMMY,—John Helton is a pleasing preacher, but perhaps not so deep as some others. Yet I suppose he is, and will be a popular one. He has a good person and an agreeable utterance. You did exactly right in not countenancing hymns not publicly received among us. Were we to encourage little poets, we should soon be overrun. But there is not the least pretence for using any new hymns at Christmas, as some of my brother's Christmas hymns are some of the finest compositions in the English tongue. Arthur Kershaw should have wrote to me before he left Northampton. Where is he ? Or what is he doing ? Tommy, be mild, be gentle toward all men.—I am, Your affectionate friend and brother. 6 Alas! Alas! . . . I have no Heart to send you Anywhere. You have neither Lowliness nor Love.' Wride was now in charge of the Athlone circuit in Ireland, with two other preachers to help him. Wesley's last line gave to him again the advice that had been so often necessary. I t was unheeded. The next letter was written in sorrow which was deepening to despair. The absence of any commencement, of the usual ' Dear Tommy' at the close, and of any friendly assurance with the bare signature, are very significant. 189 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Letter X. TAUNTON,, August 29, 1774. Alas! Alas! You have now confirmed beyond all contradiction what many of our preachers, as many as have had any intercourse with you, alleged concerning you! I am persuaded, had I read your last letter (that of the 17th inst.) at the Conference, condemning, with such exquisite bitterness and self-sufficiency, men so many degrees better than yourself, the whole Conference, as one man, would have disclaimed all connexion with you. I know not what to do. You know not what spirit you are of. Therefore there is small hope of cure. I have no heart to send you anywhere. You have neither lowliness nor love. What can I say or do more ! J. WESLEY. 6 1 do not say they defraud; but I say they act unkindly.' Another letter of remonstrance was necessary in the following February.—' You bite like a bull-dog. When you seize you never let go.' Five months after this a crisis was reached. Meanwhile Wride made anxious inquiry of Wesley concerning the division of the meagre income from the societies for the support of himself and his superintendent. The money allowance for the preachers had been fixed by the Conference of 1765 at £12 each per annum. 1 Hospitality in the homes of the people was generally received in addition to this; but the allowance was pitiably small. These were not in the priest's office for a morsel of bread. In some circuits the money taken at the testimony and fellowship meeting—'the Love feast'—was divided among the preachers. 'This was very little indeed,' says Myles, speaking of the Norwich circuit. One can understand Wride's question, if he and his colleague must 1 190 See A New History of Methodism, vol. i. p. 303. TO WRIDE AND OTHERS anticipate the claims of another helper soon to come into the circuit. Wesley begged they would not act unkindly. Letter XL LONDON, February 24, 1775. of your own spirit! You bite like a bull-dog. When you seize you never let go. I advise you to think of William Hunter no more : go on your way as if he was under the earth. At a quarterly meeting, if the collection is only six pounds and two preachers are present, they commonly share it between them. In this case I do not say they defraud a third preacher who is expected; but I say they act unkindly. But you should tell me without fear or favour who has neglected the round. 1 Part of the books which I borrowed of Mr. Hammond I left at Waterford with one who has promised to send them back directly. The other part, one promised to send from Dublin. I am ashamed of their vile negligence. I hope to be in Dublin next month, and am. Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. DEAR TOMMY,—Beware * Your Language is such as an Archangel would not use to the Devil.' Wesley is roused at last. This is one of his sharpest, sternest letters. Bishop Lavington 2 felt and deserved the same lash. Little wonder that Wride was deposed from his position as assistant to Wesley in the superintendency of a circuit, when the annual Conference was held at Leeds ten days after this July letter. John Floyde was the second 1 I.e. the circuit of societies in the care of Wride as superintendent preacher. 2 Author of The Enthusiasm of Methodists and Papists Compared. See Wesley's Works, vol. ix. pp. 1-64. 191 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS preacher in the circuit; but ' the present question concerns . . . Thomas Wride.' Letter XII. DUBLIN, July 22, 1775. The present question concerns not John Floyde but Thomas Wride. The words which I heard you speak at Limerick were such as no civilised Turk or heathen would have suffered to come out of his mouth. I hoped this would have been the last time; but you now repeat the same in cool blood. Your letter was read at the Conference,1 and our brethren desired me to inform you you are no longer fit for our Connexion. Such a foul-mouthed railer (upon whatever provocation) is quite unfit for a Methodist preacher. Such base language is too bad for the fishwives of Billingsgate. I t is such as an archangel would not use to the devil. You must have done with it for ever, if you desire to have any further fellowship with JOHN WESLEY. * You will give a good Account of the Circuit.' Wride learned his lesson; but only in part and for the time. Wesley restored him to his office a year later (August 1776), and he was given the charge of the large circuit of Whitehaven with two colleagues to assist him. Empringham, here named, was one of them. Letter XIIL LONDON, January 17, 1777. your fellow-labourers and you are zealous and active, you will give me a good account of the circuit. I found it in a flourishing state. So will you before you leave it. DEAR TOMMY,—If 1 Probably a small Conference of Wesley and the preachers in Ireland. 192 TO WRIDE AND OTHERS Robert Empringham has done exactly right as to the Sacrament. I advise you to tread in his steps. I wish you would inquire at what price I could have some kind of vessel to carry me from Whitehaven by the Isle to Dublin.—I am, Dear Tommy, Your aifFectionate friend and brother. I take no horses with me. * The Summer is before us.' In his neat handwriting—strangely neat for such a man— Wride often endorsed Wesley's letters with the date of his receipt of them. He says on this, ' Received it Monday the 18th, by Mr. Bradford.' The latter took Empringham with him to mission the Isle of Man. Methodism had been introduced there two years earlier by John Crook. Letter XIV. DARLINGTON, May 7, 1777. am resolved to make one fair trial of the Island. So I have desired brother Empringham and Joseph Bradford to go over immediately together, and preach in every town and village. Now the summer is before us, and let us try what can be done, and let brother Seed and you exert yourselves in England!—I am, Your affectionate friend and brother. DEAR TOMMY,—I ' I cannot see any Objection to your choosing her.' Some financial allowance was made for the wife of the preacher—' wife's quarterage.' This was fixed by the Conference of 1769 at £10 per annum. Later, a house was provided for the preacher and his family. As much of the preacher's success and the smooth working of the itinerant system depended upon the suitability and co-operation of N 193 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS the preacher's wife, Wesley took a close interest in the matrimonial affairs of the preachers, and occasionally gave practical and sharp advice to preachers' wives about the condition of the preacher's house. In later letters Wesley sends his ' love to S[ister] Wride.' Wesley's bitter experience of his own ill-assorted marriage lies behind the last words of this letter. Letter XV Near MARYBOROUGH, April 20, 1778. DEAR TOMMY,—I do not remember J . Woodcock. But if the account you give of her be just (and I have no reason to believe the contrary), I cannot see any objection to your choosing her; although you do well not to depend upon her brother, for his humour may easily change. Whatever you do should be done with much prayer, as the matter is of no small importance.—I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate brother. I hope the 6 Sword-drawer' is not a preacher. ' You know, Love is full of Fears.' Wride was in Scarborough when he received this tactful letter. Letter XVI. OXON, August 10, 1779. DEAR TOMMY,—George Story gives me a pleasing account of your behaviour last year. Yet I am afraid there is something wanting still. As you know, love is full of fears. I am afraid your soul is not alive to God, and that you are not deeply and steadily serious. I am afraid your common conversation is not weighty and meet to minister grace to the hearers. O Tommy, stir yourself up before the Lord! Pray that you may be all alive! Labour to be serious, earnest, edifying in your daily 194 TO WRIDE AND OTHERS conversations ! And one thing never forget! A t least be serious in the pulpit! Let nothing queer, odd, or ludicrous pass your lips there! Then the work of the Lord will prosper in our hands, and you will be a comfort to, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. ' A mere groundless Imagination.' Letter XVII. LYNN, November 1, 1779. DEAR TOMMY,—You will never disoblige me by telling me anything that you think or fear. No preacher in our Connexion ever dealt more plainly with me than Thomas Walsh did. And there never was any that I loved better, or put more confidence in. So that it is a mere groundless imagination which some of our friends have entertained that I love persons less for their plain-dealing.—I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate brother. I expect to be at London on Friday. ( Yon mean well even where you judge ill.' Letter XVIII. BRISTOL, March 9, 1780. DEAR TOMMY,—I take nothing ill that is meant well. Therefore I take nothing amiss in your letter, because I am fully persuaded you mean well even where you judge ill. Part of what you say I believe, part I do not. But I know you patently believe it. Still, however, you must think and let think. 1 I must act by my own conscience, not yours. And I really have a conscience. And I labour to have a conscience void of offence toward God and toward man.— I am, Your affectionate brother. 1 See p. 136. 195 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS 6 You might now be useful.' Notwithstanding all his patience, Wesley has at length to dismiss Wride from the work for a time, or to require him to desist from it. He had tried him in subordinate positions in The Dales, Yarm, and Scarborough circuits. He can be no longer borne with; the work of God is being grievously injured. Question 4 at the Bristol Conference of August 1780 was, ' Who desist from travelling ?' ' Answer, . . . Thomas Wride, William Barker, and John Beauland for want of health.' There follows this, which Wride would hear of and read with pain and surely with shame : N.B.—As we admit no one as a travelling preacher unless we judge him to have grace, gifts, fruit, so we cannot receive any one any longer than he retains those qualifications.' l But Wride loved Wesley and the work of preaching. By winter he is begging Wesley's correction and advice with a view to resuming the work. Letter XIX. LONDON, December 14, 1780. I wish for you is— 1. That your soul may be truly alive to God. % That you may be steadily serious and profitable in conversation. 3. That you may rise as early in the morning as health will permit. 4. That you may abstain from satire, both in speaking and writing. I think (if these points were secured) you might now be useful as a local, and by and by, as a travelling preacher.— I am, Your affectionate brother. DEAR TOMMY,—What 1 196 Minutes^ 1780 (octo. edit., 1812, p. 143). TO WRIDE AND OTHERS 6 1 desire you to come to the Conference.' It was not until three years later (1788) that Wesley readmitted Wride to the work and rank of travelling preacher. These had been sad but useful years to him. Now he is encouraged and honoured, though only second preacher in the Epworth circuit, by being summoned to the London Conference of 1785. Wesley's autocracy, paternal though it was, comes out in this letter. Letter XX. DUBLIN, July 8, 1785. wonder at nothing in poor Nicholas, but I wonder much at James Kershaw. Unless our preachers had already left their preaching-house, surely he would not have let it to any others ! I love John Fenwick well, but I know he was a faulty man that once or twice. However, if there be no fresh matter of complaint, what is past shall go for nothing. I desire you to come to the Conference, a conference while I live is ' The preachers whom / invite to confer with me.1 Many years ago one informed me at London, 6 The stewards have discovered they are not your stewards, but the people's, and are to direct, not be directed by you.** The next Sunday I let them drop, and named seven other stewards. No contentious persons shall for the future meet in any Conference. They may dispute elsewhere if they please.—I am, dear Tommy, Yours affectionately. I never said a word of publishing that account. DEAR TOMMY,—I * Disappoint those who wait for your halting.' Wride was restored to the full duties and influence of a superintendent preacher by the Conference of this year, and appointed to Norwich. He had troubles there. 197 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Letter XXL BRISTOL, September 5, 1785. you do what you can you do enough. I trust you will now use every possible means of redeeming the time. I wish you would never neglect sleeping early and rising early. Beware of anything like lightness or trifling. Wherever you are, be obliging and be serious. Disappoint those who wait for your halting.—I am, with love to S[ister] Wride, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. DEAR TOMMY,-—When 'Those doggerel Verses.' Wride wrote Wesley with particulars of a memorial inscription and its doggerel about a Mr. Turner in the Norwich chapel. Wesley hated ' vile panegyric' in epitaphs, and he disliked still more bad rhyme and weak verse. He gives peremptory instructions on the matter in this and the letter which follows it. The ; ticket' here referred to is of interest. I t was the Methodist class-ticket, issued for all by Wesley every quarter. 1 I t was given by him or the preacher in charge to every member of the Methodist societies as a token of membership. Each bore a passage of Scripture. The member's name was written on it, and initialled by the preacher. It secured admission for the member at the meetings of the society, and recognition by Methodists when he removed to another town. Letter XXIL KINGS WOOD, September 16, 1785. next will, I suppose, find me in London, where I hope to be in about a fortnight. We know not what stops our northern schoolmaster, and DEAR TOMMY,—Your 1 See A New History of Methodism, vol. i. p. 286, and Plates xvii. and xxix. Tickets are still issued, and very largely, but not universally, used in the Methodist churches. 198 TO WRIDE AND OTHERS expect to see him every day. As soon as he comes, Mr. Jones will make the best of his way to Norwich. I leave it wholly to you whether and how far you should accept of Dr. Hunt's offer. With regard to Mr. Proud and your capital singer, you acted exactly right. But I expect you will hear of it at both ears. Those doggerel verses must not remain in the chapel. I wish Zac. Houlton would spend two or three weeks with you. He is not eloquent, but he is useful. You do well in insisting on every person shewing his ticket. I wonder Jon. Cousins did not. I t is of importance t o mind the select society; that, I apprehend, he never neglected. If the leaders and the bands are closely attended to, they will do well; otherwise not. I am, with love to S[ister] Wride, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. * I hope to be preaching . . . everywhere at halfpast six in the evening.' What a programme Wesley here makes for this week of the autumn of 1785 ! He was then eighty-two. The sermons he refers to included one by Coke on the consecration of Bishop Asbury, in Baltimore, the year before that of this letter. Letter XXIII. LONDON, October 8, 1785. DEAR TOMMY,—On Monday se'nnight (the 17th instant) I hope to be at Norwich (coming by the mail coach); on Tuesday at Yarmouth; on Wednesday and Thursday at Lowestoft, preaching everywhere at half-hour past six in the evening; on Friday noon at Beccles, or when you please; in the evening at Loddon and on Saturday evening at Norwich. 199 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS The verses must be effaced some way before I come down. Be as exact in discipline as you please. Zac. Houlton was on the road; but one met him and told him he was not wanted. I always lodge in our own houses. I think those sermons may stop bother.—I am, with love to Spster] Wride, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. ' Set him a Pattern in all Things.' Letter XXIV. LONDON, November 8, 1785. DEAR TOMMY,—James M. Byron is an amiable young man; at present full of faith and love. If possible, guard him from those who will be inclined to love him too well. Then he will be as useful a fellow-labourer as you can desire. And set him a pattern in all things.—I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. * Preach in the Morning . . . none sing oftener than twice.' But James M. Byron liked more hymns than Wesley permitted in the service. He declared that the Norwich Methodists ' sing very well and I could hear them sing ever so long.''x There was a good, if somewhat unmanageable, choir there. The young preacher there, John M'Kersey, had another reason for liking much singing according to Wride's report: ' his avowed reason is that it saves him labour and fills up the time! , Wesley quotes this. And neither of these young preachers liked the morning preaching service at 5 A.M. M'Kersey said he could rise soon enough, but could not preach without his breakfast. Wride told him with characteristic sarcasm to take his breakfast to bed with him, and eat it when the clock struck four ! The Norwich 1 ' T h e Correspondence of Thomas Wride,' Wesley Historical Society Proceedings^ vol. i. p. 140; Tyerman, Life of Wesley', vol. iii. p. 460. 200 TO WRIDE AND OTHERS Methodists had fallen from faith in this matter, as Wesley shows in a later letter. During the winter months he concedes that the service might be at 6 A.M. Letter XXV. LONDON, November 17, 1785. DEAR TOMMY,—Deal plainly and yet tenderly with James Byron, and he will be a very useful labourer. But none can be a Methodist preacher unless he is both able arid willing to preach in the morning, which is the most healthy exercise in the world. I desire that none of our preachers would sing oftener than twice at one service. We need nothing to fill up our time. In every place where there is a sufficient number of believers, do all you can to prevail upon them to meet in band. Be mild, be serious, and you will conquer all things. —I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. ' If they do not come to their Senses . . . ! ' Letter XXVI. LONDON, December 14, 1785. DEAR TOMMY,—Have patience with the young men, and they will mend upon your hands. But remember! safe and fair goes far. For twenty years and upwards we had good morning congregations at Norwich, but they might begin at six till Lady Day. I desire J. M. Byron to try what he can do. Better days will come. I pray let that doggerel hymn be no more sung in our chapel. If they do not soon come to their senses at Norwich, I will remove you to Colchester.—I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. Be mild! Be serious! 201 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS 'Sing twice . . . once before and once after Sermon.5 With the above letter to Wride, Wesley sent an ultimatum to the young preachers John M'Kersey and James M. Byron, and directions for the singers. Here is Wesley's letter, of which Wride took a copy. Although fond of singing himself, Wesley disliked much singing in the Methodist services, lest the time for prayer and sermon might be much curtailed, and the simplicity and spirituality of the service lessened for his people. Many of these had then little appreciation of choral singing and classic music. His command was 6 Sing no anthems.' Organs in his chapels in his lifetime were very few. When he heard an efficient organist and a devoutly rendered musical service he was enraptured. To J. M'Kersey and J. M. Byron. If you do not choose to obey me, you need not; I will let you go when you please and send other preachers in your place. If you do choose to stay with me, never sing more than twice ; once before, and once after sermon. I have given Mr. Wride directions concerning the singers. Pray assist him in seeing these directions observed. You are young ; I am in pain for you. Follow his advice. He is older and wiser than you. You would do well to meet the children and the Select Society, though it be a cross. I will thank you if you will do all you can to strengthen Mr. Wride's hands. Beware of strengthening any party against him. Let you three be one ! Nothing will give greater satisfaction than this to, Your affectionate brother. Wesley's command was obeyed; the young preachers still served him. But they and Wride were removed to other spheres at the next Conference. However the good Norwich folk felt about their preachers, Wride told Wesley that ' at this time a man is wanted for Norwich who has in him the 202 TO WRIDE AND OTHERS Lion, the Lamb, the Dove, the Serpent, and the Ox.' Wride was not that man. * She was surly. • . . You have an Estate left you.' Letter XXVII. LONDON, October 29, 1780. DEAR TOMMY,—I am entirely of your mind. If any man (to waive everything else) can make me sleep without touching me, he may call the matter what he pleases: I know it is not magnetism, but magic. Mr. Mears did not tell me (that I know) anything about letters one, two, three. Women told me at Chatham, ' We called on Mrs. Wride, and offered her any service in our power, but she was so sullen and surly, we had not the heart to go again.' But is it true, Tommy, that you have an estate left you ? I fear it is not so large as the Duke of Bedford's ! I should be glad to bring you all to a good agreement, if I knew how.—I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. < Lift up your Heart to God, or you will be angry with me.' This letter, a tactful, tender, beautiful rebuke and correction closely characteristic of Wesley, is given in his Works x without a name. It so exactly fits Thomas Wride's errors and Wesley's patient pleadings with him, as seen in our earlier letters, that it is inserted here. The St. John of England is now eighty-three years. His tender, lovingly frank message recalls the epistles of the aged St. John the Divine, whose terse, clear style he so much admired. 1 Works; vol. xiii. p. 115. 203 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Letter To Mr. XXVIII. . December 1786. know I love you. Ever since I knew you I have neglected no way of showing it that was in my power. And you know I esteem you for your zeal and activity, for your love of discipline, and for your gifts which God has given you ; particularly quickness of apprehension and readiness of utterance; especially in prayer. Therefore I am jealous over you, lest you should lose any of the things you have gained, and not receive a full reward. And the more so because I fear you are wanting in other respects. And who will venture to tell you so ? You will scarce know how to bear it from me, unless you lift up your heart to God. If you do this, I may venture to tell you what I fear without any further preface. I fear you think of yourself more highly than you ought to think. Do not you think too highly of your understanding? of your gifts, particularly in preaching ? as if you were the very best preacher in the Connexion? of your own importance ? as if the work of God, here or there, depended wholly or mainly on you ? and of your popularity ? which I have found to my surprise far less, even in L , than I expected. May not this be much owing to the want of brotherly love ? With what measure you mete, men will measure to you again. I fear there is something unloving in your spirit; something not only of roughness but of harshness, yea, of sourness ! Are you not also extremely open to prejudice, and not easy to be cured of it ? so that whenever you are prejudiced you commence bitter, implacable, unmerciful? If so, that people are prejudiced against you is both the natural and judicial consequence. 204 DEA&S- 5 —You TO WRIDE AND OTHERS I am afraid lest your want of love to your neighbours should spring from want of love to God; from want of thankfulness. I have sometimes heard you speak in a manner that made me tremble; indeed, in terms that not only a weak Christian but even a serious Deist would scruple to use. I fear you greatly want evenness of temper. Are you not generally too high or too low ? Are not all your passions too lively, your anger in particular ? Is it not too soon raised ? And is it not too impetuous, causing you to be violent, boisterous, bearing down all before you ? Now, lift up your heart to God, or you will be angry at me. But I must go a little farther. I fear you are greatly wanting in the government of your tongue. You are not exact in relating facts. I have observed it myself. You are apt to amplify; to enlarge a little beyond the truth. You cannot imagine, if others observe this, how it will affect your reputation. But I fear you are more wanting in another respect: that you give a loose to your tongue when you are angry; that your language then is not only sharp, but coarse and ill-bred. If this be so, the people will not bear it. They will not take it either from you or me. 6 L e t the Matter drop. 5 Letter XXIX. DUBLIN, April 2, 1789. DEAR TOMMY,—I am surprised that a man who really fears God should engage himself in so bad a cause, but undoubtedly you have the better of the argument. Yet I see no prospect of convincing a man of his rank. Therefore I think it is the wisest way to let the matter drop. The publishing of a thing of this kind was only tried to 205 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS stir up a nest of hornets.—I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. 6 Not one harsh or passionate Word.' Wesley was on the last of his many preaching tours in Ireland, and writes in kindly, merry mood. William Darney was one of his preachers who suffered much at the hands of the mobs, and had published some verses and simple hymns. Wride wanted no more such. He was for Wesley's hymns. Once again the young preacher in the circuit is marked for gentle treatment, and tender, prayerful patience is urged on Wride. Atlay and Eels led some bodies of trustees who left Wesley, as they were determined that they and not he or the Conference should appoint the preachers to the Dewsbury and other chapels for which they were responsible. Wride, who was now again in charge at Whitehaven, had carefully kept hold for Wesley at Brompton. 1 Letter XXX. SIDARE, May 28, 1789. Nay, Tommy, nay: you are more nice than wise. I have seen worse verses than these, even in print, in the very poems of William Darney. The rhymes are not bad. Why should you damp a rising genius ? If he and [you] were to set your wits together you would surely produce something ! Deal very gently with the young man. I am persuaded he will take advice. You did exceeding well with regard to the house proposed to be built at Brompton. We have fresh warning. Good brother Coate and Todd have given our preaching-house at North Shields to John Atlay and William Eels. So you see what we have to trust to. But you must deal exceedingly tenderly with them. Not one harsh or passionate 1 206 Tyerman, Life of Wesley', vol. iii. p. 551. TO WRIDE AND OTHERS word, or they will make their advantage of it. Above all, you should make it a matter of prayer.—I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. 6 Speak as plain and dull as one of us/ This was Wesley's last counsel to Wride m this long series of letters, hitherto almost unknown. Wesley was within ten months of the end of his long life. He is on his last itinerary in the north of England and Scotland, and makes pathetic admission, at last, of the limitations enforced by his advanced age of eighty-seven years. He had to decline Wride's affectionate request that he would visit The Dales circuit. He did not carry out the proposals named below, although he visited many places during this tour. Letter XXXI. DARLINGTON, May 5, 1790. DEAR TOMMY,—It was a little thing to me, when I was able to ride on horseback, to strike a few miles out of my way. But that time is past. All I can do now is to visit the chief societies. I hope to see our friends in Weardale and Barnard Castle, and I believe that will be as much as I must attempt. I hope you have now got quit of your queer, arch expressions in preaching, and that you speak as plain and dull as one of us.—I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate friend and brother. II To ' steady Joseph Taylor.' These letters by Wesley to one of his preachers, Joseph Taylor, may be contrasted with those to Wride. Of the thirteen letters here given, eleven have not hitherto been £07 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS published, or, if so, only in fugitive form. Besides this fact, some features of interest emerge in them. Joseph Taylor (died 1880) began the work in 1777, and continued it for forty-four years. He was eminently reliable and useful. Wesley appointed him one of his trustees. When he had been in the work only five years he was put in charge of the wide and prosperous Cornwall West circuit, with three other ministers. So inviting and exhausting was that field that his exertions permanently injured his constitution; but six hundred members were added in two years. Wesley's prophecy (Letter i.) was fulfilled. Chapels were enlarged and new ones built (Letters iv., v., VIIL). Taylor specially earned Wesley's favour by his attention to the sale and distribution of the works he issued. To this Wesley here refers again and again. This was one of Wesley's tests for his preachers. He had such faith in the ministry of the printed page that he insisted on every one of his preachers being a colporteur and book agent. The preacher's saddle-bags were filled with Wesley's publications, which he sold or distributed as he went to preach at the places in his circuit and elsewhere. He rose or fell in Wesley's esteem as he succeeded in this work. This helped to make the Methodists a reading people, and the financial profits aided their funds for aged and enfeebled preachers and their widows. Wesley's changes as to the status of some of his distinguished preachers must have sorely tried Taylor; but he was obedient. Wesley ordained him in 1785 for the work in Scotland, but would not allow him to exercise ministerial functions when appointed to labour in England (Letter xn.). As Tyerman puts it, Wesley, ' who three years before had frocked his itinerant for the people across the Tweed, now unfrocked him for the people bordering on the Trent.' Thomas Hanby, the eldest of his colleagues there, who had also been ordained by Wesley, felt that locality did not decide his duty in these matters, and continued to minister as in Scotland, much to the benefit of Nottingham Methodists. 208 TO WRIDE AND OTHERS * Such a Work in Cornwall as never was yet.' Letter I. BRISTOL., September 9, 1782. will now have full scope for the exercise of every talent that God has given you. And you have fellow-labourers after your own heart. See that no strangeness creep in between you. If you continue instant in prayer, I trust there will be such a work in Cornwall as never was yet You remember the rule of Conference, that every assistant should take my books into his own hands, as having better opportunities of dispersing them than any private person can possibly have. I desire you would do this without delay. The Primitive Physic should be in every family. So should the Christian Pattern x if possible. Of the Magazines I need say nothing. Herein I am persuaded you will tread in James Rogers's steps, and go beyond him as far as you can. The children will require much attention, and the Bands too, or they will moulder away.—I am, Dear Joseph, Your affectionate friend and brother. DEAR JOSEPH,—You ' T h e Books . . . should Assistant/ be kept by the Letter II. BRISTOL, September 24, 1782. DEAR JOSEPH,—Jos. Andrews writes to me about his keeping the books still. I answer,' It was determined at the Conference that the books all over England should be kept by the assistant in each circuit.'* I believe he has 1 Wesley's edition of De Imitatione Christi by Thomas a Kempis. o 209 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS discharged this office well; but I believe you will discharge it better. Yet do not expect to do your duty without giving offence! Recommend the Magazines, Kempis, and the Primitive Physic in earnest. And take care of the Bands and the children!—I am, Dear Joseph, Your affectionate friend and brother. * Tracts and Magazines.5 Letter III. LONDON, October 19, 1782. tracts that are in any degree damaged you will do well to sell for half-price. And those of them that are greatly damaged you may give away, as you see proper. But I apprehend it would be best, when a proper occasion is, to send the Magazines by sea to Bristol or London. When they have preaching only one night in a week, you may meet the Bands and the Society by turns.—I am, Dear Joseph, Your affectionate friend and brother. DEAR JOSEPH,—Those ' W e shall not build any more in haste.' Letter IV. LONDON, January 16, 1783. am glad to hear so good an account of Marazion. You must endeavour to hire a larger room at Truro. We shall not build any more in haste. I often preach abroad, in winter as well as summer. In my Journals, in the Magazines, in every possible way, I have advised the Methodists to keep to the Church. They that do this most prosper best in their souls; I have observed it long. If ever the Methodists in general were to leave the Church, 210 DEAR JOSEPH,—I TO WRIDE AND OTHERS I must leave them. 1 —I am, Dear Joseph, Your affectionate friend and brother. ' Enlarge the House and Air enough.' Remember, Light enough Letter V. LONDON, February 25, 1783. DEAR JOSEPH,—I make no doubt but you will be well able to collect enough in the circuit to enlarge the house 2 at St. Ives. And the sooner you begin the better. Only see that you have good workmen, and a good plan! Remember, light enough and air enough; and do not make a bungling, but a neat work. When I have fixed my plan, 3 I will send you a copy of it. I set out for Bristol on Sunday evening.—I am, Dear Joseph, Your affectionate friend and brother. P.8.—Pray tell Capt. Rd. Williams that I have his letter and will consider it. ' Do all you can during this precious Season.' Letter VI. DUBLIN, April 26, 1783. all means let James Hall 4 come to the Conference. If he would put forth all his strength, and be exact in every branch of his office, I would appoint him for the assistant next year. But I should be sorry if the work should decay. Do all you can during this precious season. I shall have no objection to your being in Nottingham DEAR JOSEPH,—By 1 3 4 2 See above, p. 131. I.e. the preaching-house. Of his itinerary. The second preacher in Cornwall West circuit in which Taylor was superintendent. 211 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS circuit (unless you are in love). But if you go thither, you must take the books into your own hands; though I do not say you will receive many thanks from Matthew Bagshaw. I expect to be in England in about ten days.—I am, Dear Joseph, Your affectionate friend and brother. * According to the printed Minutes.' Letter VII. LONDON, June 5, 1783. DEAR JOSEPH,—According to the printed Minutes, p. 8, S[ister] Rodda is to have her allowance 1 from Cornwall West, and Spster] Day out of the Preachers1 Fund. The fault therefore lay first in Joseph Harper, for Cornwall has nothing to do with Spster] Day this year; and secondly, in John Atiay, who ought to have sent him and you the Minutes immediately after the Conference. Send no more money to Spster] Day, but to Rpchar]d Rodda.—I am, Dear Joseph, Your affectionate friend and brother. ' Concerning the building of Preaching-houses.5 Letter VIIL LONDON, December 24, 1783. DEAR JOSEPH,—Look into the Minutes concerning the building of preaching-houses, and see that the ' Directions' 2 there laid down be observed. 1 See above, p. 193. The Minutes of the annual Conferences in this period have the question, ' How many wives are to be provided for ? ' These are the wives of the preachers. Generally the circuit where the preacher laboured paid to him a small additional allowance for his wife quarterly. Others were provided for out of the general fund of the preachers. 2 These were that each case must first be proposed in the Conference; that before moneys were gathered in circuits other than that concerned, the consent of the superintendent preacher should be obtained; and that the collection be made between Conference and March.—Minutes (octo. edit.), 1775, p. 121. 212 TO WRIDE AND OTHERS No one can object to your making a collection for the house in your circuit,—I am, Your affectionate friend and brother. ' The Books.' Letter IX. LONDON, January 12, 1784. am sorry that so useful a man as brother Lewly x was constrained to leave Worcester. But I am not sorry that the books are delivered into your hands, as I am clearly persuaded a far greater number of them will be disposed of. Take care of the Select Societies as well as the Bands.— I am. Dear Joseph, Your affectionate friend and brother. DEAR JOSEPH,—I * The Preachers going to America.' A t the Conference held in the previous month at Leeds Wesley made his first appointment of preachers for America. In the list of circuits and their preachers there is this item, vague and vast—' America, Thomas Coke, Richard Whatcoat, T. Vasey."2 In view of this advance, of which such great things were expected and soon came, the request of a preacher's wife for the furnishing of a room in their modest home must stand aside. Letter X. BRISTOL, August 30, 1784. DEAR JOSEPH,—On no account whatever can I excuse any preacher in the Connexion from using his utmost endeavours for the preachers going to America. What is the furnishing a room or two in comparison of this ? Especially for one who is well able to do it for herself! I wonder she 1 A letter from Wesley to a Mr. Edward Lewly, Birmingham, dated Jan. 12, 1791, appears in his Works, vol. xiv. p. 291. 2 See chapter v u . 21S JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS should desire it or indeed accept of i t ! However, if this be done, the other must not be left undone.—I am, Dear Joseph, Your affectionate friend and brother. * I would not employ an Apostle if he could not preach in the Morning.5 Letter XL LIVERPOOL, April 7, 1785. do not see that I can in conscience employ brother Thomas as a travelling preacher. Do not you know what I have often said ? I would not employ an apostle as such if he could not preach in the morning. 1 And this he cannot do. Neither is he able, if he was willing, regularly to keep a circuit. Be faithful to God, and the people, and your own soul 1 And keep an active, zealous man, Mr. M'Geary, while you have him. Else there is want of a preacher in the Canterbury circuit. I thank you for the account of brother Tregellas, and am, Dear Joseph, Your affectionate friend and brother. DEAR JOSEPH,—I ' You should not wear the Surplice . . . anymore.' Letter XIL LONDON, November 16, 1788. DEAR JOSEPH,—I take knowledge of your spirit, and believe it is your desire to do all things right. Our friends at Newark seem to have forgotten that we have determined over and over ' not to leave the Church/ Before they had given you that foolish advice, they should have consulted me. I desire you should not wear the surplice nor administer the Lord's Supper any more.—I am, Dear Joseph, Your affectionate friend and brother. 1 214 The Methodist service at 5 A.M. See p. 200. TO WRIDE AND OTHERS ' A Business of some Importance,' Letter XIII. LONDON^ February 13, 1789. DEAR JOSEPH,—I have a business of some importance for you to transact. Pray go to my old friend Matthew Bagshaw, and in my name desire of him— 1* To tell you how J. Wilson has wronged him. % To introduce you to Mr. Henshaw, of whom you are to inquire (and write me word directly) what had passed between J. Wilson and him ! Desire him also— 3. To let you know whether he has wronged any one else in Nottingham ! If he has, in what manner. If I can come clearly to the bottom of his affair, it is possible I may be of some real service to him. But till then it is not possible. For God will surely fight against him while he continues to cover his sin.—I ara, Dear Joseph, Your affectionate friend and brother. Ill To Thomas Taylor. Wesley often wrote to Thomas Taylor. He became a preacher in 1761 and died in 1816. He was one of Wesley's strongest, most heroic helpers, and was twice President of Conference after Wesley's death. While Wesley believed himself to be a waiter upon Providence as to the development of Methodism (Letters I. and in.), Taylor was early convinced that Methodists should claim all the scriptural ordinances and rights of a New Testament church. He had a mind of his own, and alone and stoutly disapproved of the establishment by Wesley of the Arminian Magazine. He dared to go to Conference without Wesley's invitation, when younger preachers who were 215 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS his converts were invited, saying, ' I f I am thrown overboard, I will swim as well as I can, believing the Lord will take me up."*1 Wesley's condemnation of liquor-distilling and billbroking is notable (Letter n.). 2 He thought the former one of the chief causes of the high price of corn and bread, styled distilled liquors ' distilled damnation,' and declared that they were poisons which < naturally destroyed not only the strength and life, but also the morals of our countrymen. In this view he was in advance of most clergymen and public leaders.' 3 He exercised sharp discipline on commercial and financial delinquents (Letter n.). His Rules 4 forbade his members to ' borrow without a probability of paying or to take up goods without a probability of paying for them.' These three short characteristic letters are little known, and were in the hands of the Rev. Samuel Dunn, the friend of the Rev. James Everett. * I go calmly and quietly on my Way.' Letter I. February 24, 1786. believe if we had then left the Church, we should not have done a tenth part of the good we have done; but I do not trouble myself on this head. I go calmly and quietly on my way, doing what I conceive to be the will of God. I do not, will not, concern myself with what will be when I am dead. I take no thought about that. If I did, I should probably hide myself either at Kingswood or Newcastle, and leave you all to yourselves.—I remain, Your affectionate friend and brother. DEAR TOMMY,—I 1 2 3 4 216 Tyerman, Wesley's Life, vol. iii. p. 284. Ibid., p. 496. Works) vol. xi. p. 55. A New History of Methodism, vol. ii. p. 564. TO WRIDE AND OTHERS ' Distilled Liquors . . . I would banish them out of the World.' Letter II. LONDON, December 11, 1787. liquors have their use, but are infinitely overbalanced by the abuse of them; therefore, were it in my power, I would banish them out of the world. . . . It is no wonder that young man should be ruined who connected himself with that execrable bill trade. In London I expel every one out of our Society who has anything to do with it. Whoever endorses a bill, that is, promises to pay for more than he is worth, is either a fool or a knave. 1 —I am, Dear Tommy, Your affectionate brother. DEAR TOMMY,—Distilled * Kill your enemies ? They 11 die of themselves if you let them alone.5 Letter III. LONDON, February 13, 1791. DEAR TOMMY,—The doubt is whether the remedy would not propagate the disease by making many people anxious to understand it who never thought of it before. Remember the madman's words— e Kill your enemies ? Kill a fool's head of your own ; T h e y ' l l die of themselves if you let them a l o n e / I take knowledge that you have been a Dissenter. Several clergymen at this day do much good both to the cause of God in general and to the Methodists in particular, and they that hurt us do it not as clergymen but as b[ad] clergymen. I will not blame any preacher for mildly warning 1 Tyerman, Wesley's Life, vol. iii. p. 544, gives a letter from Wesley to Taylor dated June 7, 1788, in which the second paragraph of this letter is repeated word for word. 217 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS our people of them. Unstable Methodists will always be subject to the temptation of sermon-hunting. I do not advise our people to go to the Low Church. I shall write no plan till I know how my strength turns out; perhaps I may do it when I come to Bristol. Peace be with you and yours.—I am, Dear Tommy, Yours affectionately. IV To James Oddie. Three new letters from Wesley to James Oddie, one of his preachers, contribute items of interest. Oddie began his work in 1746 and retired to enter into business in 1771. Here is Wesley organising an effort to raise £12,000 for debts on his chapels. I t was a large sum then for Methodists to contribute. Methodism had existed twenty-eight years. I t had 41 circuits, 104 itinerant preachers, 26,000 members, and 100 chapels—84 in England, 1 in Wales, 2 in Scotland, and 13 in Ireland. The combined debts upon these was £11,388. By this scheme and appeal, which was supported by the fine Newcastle-on-Tyne circuit where Oddie was chief minister, £5000 was raised in the first year and £3700 in the two years following. This was not all that was needed, and new debts were created; but it was an early and stimulating proof of the advantage of the connexional system. Wesley thought this a commanding advantage of Methodism. By it the strong helped the weak. The 'Yearly Collection' here referred to was for the expenses of the connexional system and contingencies. Wesley regarded this as indispensable. ' Wherever this is dropped, you drop me' Letter I. LONDON, December 15, 1767. have written myself to Miss Dales, T. Moses, C. Hewitson, Fenwick, Smith, Watson, Hosmer, 218 DEAR JAMES,—I TO WRIDE AND OTHERS Morrison, Davison, Parker, Lipton, Bowmaker, Al. Patterson, T. Dobson, Rd. Parker, C. Bell, Joblin, W. Newton, R. Foster, Jon. Simpson, C. Coward, Gibson, Jos. and George Morrison, Capt. Robinson, Mark Middleton, Jo. Allen, and Mrs. Bate. Do all you can with the rest; think not that one of you will be poorer for this. I will send you printed letters, which you may seal and deliver in my name to as many as you please (except the above). Speak and spare not, trusting in God. But never let one thought come into your mind, of dropping the Yearly Collection; not if any one would give me i?20,000 to-day. Wherever this is dropped, you drop trie, for I cannot go on one year without it. I should think you had never been present at a Conference, nor ever read the Minutes of any, for these four years. Talk nothing discouraging, but encouraging. Prophesy good and not evil,—I am, Dear James, Your affectionate friend and brother. * Go on, go on, in God's N a m e ! ' Letter II LONDON., January 12, 1768. DEAR JAMES,—Desire an old tried Scot, William Darney by name, to take a turn or two in the Dunbar Circuit, and I will desire William Minethorp, now near York (a good man and a good preacher), to go down into your circuit and supply his place. Then Alnwick will have the preaching on Sunday, which is highly expedient. If we pay the debt in one year (and there is a fair prospect) it is all along of your Newcastle people, for nobody else thought of it. Go on, go on, in GOD^S name!-—I am, Your affectionate friend and brother. 219 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS * Push on the Collection.' Letter HI. LONDON, February 14, 1768. require William Ellis to go into the doctor's (if he is not gone already) without delay. Otherwise I require you to forbid his preaching in any of our societies. Push on the Collection in God's name. I think you will not easily stop short of seven hundred. It is not right, Jemmy, it is not right. They envy the rooms of those poor girls, and want at all hazards to thrust them out. I wrote to Molly Dale on Saturday in haste, but to-day I have written her my cooler thoughts. Peace be with you and yours.—Dear Jemmy, adieu! DEAR JEMMY,-—I V To Various Preachers. ' All is best.' A new letter, worth reading for the radiance which Wesley's spirit sheds over it notwithstanding his troubles. Queer, dilatory Michael Fenwick is here, whom Wesley's charity styled ' a n excellent groom, valet de charnbre, nurse, and, upon occasion, a tolerable preacher.' And much sickness afflicts the family in the Orphan House at Newcastle-onTyne, where preachers' wives, widows, and orphans found a kindly home. Here, too, Matthew Errington stored and sold Wesley's publications, and now sends an account of sales. To Matthew Errington. LONDON, January 8, 1757. have done well in sending me a particular account. The bill came safe, and is accepted. But Michael's senseless delay has distressed me much. He ought to have been here the $8th of November, and to have M Y DEAR BROTHER,—You mo TO WRIDE AND OTHERS then brought with him all the money he could procure. For the time to come, if he should take another journey, I must punctually fix beforehand how many days he is to stay in every place. I hope you all continue a family of love, and that the stewards and you are in harmony with each other. I should be glad to see poor Becky, especially if I found her all alive to God. We have a sickly family here—my wife, Jenny, Sally Clay, ill of paralytic; T. Walsh and Jeremy Morgan of consumptive disorders. But all is best.—I am, your affectionate brother. ' Let us deal openly with one another.' This hitherto unpublished letter from the Colman Collection fills a gap, and is itself important. Wesley was in the midst of the Calvinistic controversy with Whitefield and his followers. Among these was Joseph Humphreys. Wesley styled him once his first lay preacher; but this was in 1738, and before the rise of the Methodist Societies.1 He declared his love for Wesley, but also his intention openly to ' renounce your peculiar- doctrines.'' This is Wesley's reply. I t may be compared with that to Whitefield.2 Seward was another whom Whitefield had attracted. He was soon to become a martyr in the brutal persecution of the Methodists. To Joseph Humphreys. LONDON, April 27, 1741. do not understand you. What Doctrines do you mean ? That ' Christ died for all' ? or, that ' H e that is born of God sinneth n o t ' ? These are not peculiar to me. The first is St. Paul's, the second is St. John's. What grievous temptation do you mean ? Let us deal M Y DEAR BROTHER,-—I 1 See p. 73. 2 Page 104. 881 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS openly with one another. But if any doubt arise, O fly to Christ, and confer not with flesh and blood ! I least of all understand what you mean by ' loving and respecting me/ Ah, my brother, this will not hold for one month. You will in a very short time love and respect me j ust as poor Mr. Seward did. Yet ' Gracious art thou, O Lord, and true are Thy judgements.'—Adieu ! ' A providential Connexion.' A hitherto unpublished letter, from the original in the Bodleian Library, Oxford. It was during this visit to Coolylough, Ireland, that Wesley, always curious and observant of natural phenomena, wrote in his Journal: ' I rode to Coolylough (where was the Quarterly Meeting), and preached at eleven, and in the evening. While we were singing, I was surprised to see the horses from all parts of the ground gathering round us. Is it true then that horses, as well as lions and tigers, have an ear for music ?' John Whitehead was Wesley's preacher in charge of the Bristol circuit; Whitwell was his colleague. To John Whitehead. COOLYLOUGH, July 4, 1769. from every circuit must be at Conference ; but it may be either bro[ther] Whitwell or you. I think the money need not be brought; only let us have exact accounts, and lists of the societies. When you mentioned, first, your apprehension that you could manage the Kings wood School, and then your thoughts concerning Nancy Smith, it seemed to me that there might be a providential connexion between the one and the other —though not to the exclusion of James Hindemarsh: 1 that I never thought of. Good will follow from the disagreement of C. Proctor and M Y DEAR BROTHER,—One 1 An English master at the school, 1765-1773. TO WRIDE AND OTHERS —— Palmer. I should be apt to believe a dying woman. Be zealous ! Be watchful!—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. * I live from Hand to Mouth.' A hitherto unpublished letter from the original in the British Museum. Richard Bourke, then labouring at Waterford, was one of Wesley's preachers from 1766 to 1778. Wesley was feeling the weight of heavy debts on his chapels and undertakings.1 He continually made the venture of faith, and it was usually completely justified. In his lifetime, and since, Methodism was a magnificent and startling example of the wisdom of the voluntary principle in Church finance. The < maintenance' allowed for a preacher about this period was £1% per annum, with =£10 for his wife.2 To Richard Bourke. EDINBURGH, May 12, 1770. doubt not your going into Waterford circuit was for good. I t is well the house at Kilkenny is at length getting forward. But the general collection, out of which I propose to assist our brethren, is not brought in until the Conference. And I myself seldom have any money beforehand. I live as I may say from hand to mouth. As to the preachers, I think it very hard, if Ireland cannot allow a maintenance to the preachers in Ireland. But indeed your case is peculiar. Exclusive of what they are to allow for your wife, I will allot her five pounds (English) for you.—-I am, yours affectionately. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—I [Endorsed in another hand.] Received the contents from Miss Mary Holland, June 11th, 1771. 1 2 See Letters to Hopper, p. 149. A New History of Methodism, i. 303. 223 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS To Samuel Bardsley. This little known letter, from the original in the Library of Victoria Methodist College, Toronto, was the first of several sent to this Methodist preacher. It was addressed to him ' A t Mr. James Walker's, in Sheffield.' He was then a preacher in the Cheshire circuit, and was moved by Wesley to Sheffield at his next Conference, August 1770. The second letter, hitherto unpublished, is from the original in the possession of the Iiev. T. Ferrier Hulme, M . A , Bristol. During a long ministry Bardsley was 6 transparently sincere, profoundly zealous for the cause of God, and minutely attentive to every part of Christian discipline: ' A Parent has in this case a Negative Voice.' Letter I. LONDON, November 24, 1770. DEAR SAMMY,—According to your account, the very same difficulty subsists to this day. Your mother is not willing : and I told you before, this is, in my judgement, an insuperable bar. I am fully persuaded, that a parent has in this case a negative voice. Therefore while matters continue thus, I do not see that you can go any further.—I am, your affectionate brother. 'The Second Blessing, . . . receivable in a Moment.' Letter II. BOLTON, April 3, 1772. DEAR SAMMY,—I am glad you are got into your Circuit again. Now put forth all your strength. Never be ashamed of the old Methodist Doctrine. Press all believers to go on to perfection. Insist everywhere on the Second Blessing, as TO WRIDE AND OTHERS receivable in a moment, and receivable now, by simple faith. Read again the ' Plain Account of Xtian [Christian] Perfection.'' And strive always to converse in a plain unaffected manner.—I am, dear Sammy, yours affectionately. ' Are you out of your Wits ?' This is the whole of this letter, surely the shortest that Wesley ever wrote. But it is alive. Six weeks earlier he had appointed Francis Wolfe second preacher in the Bristol circuit. To Francis Wolfe. FRANKY, BRISTOL, September 15, 1773. are you out of your wits ? Why are you not at Bristol? ' I have no Objection to your Speaking.5 Two hitherto unpublished or little known letters, kindly copied for me by the late Bev. William Boyden of Westonsuper-Mare, from his originals. The second answers a question in Wesley's Itinerary as to his presence in Norwich on that day, and also shows that he still welcomed the help of clergy. Stonehouse was a Manchester Methodist, and the 6 new chapel' was, the Rev. T. E. Brigden suggests, Oldham Street, which Wesley opened in 1781. Its modern successor is the Central Hall there. Dr. Cornelius Bayley was a master at Wesley's Kingswood School, 1778-1783. He became a clergyman, assisted Wesley at a service in Manchester a year before this letter. Later he was known as the ' Methodist' clergyman of St. James's Church in that city. * Another person' was probably the Rev. Edward Smythe, an Irish clergyman. He had been a paid helper of Wesley in London, and was now probably curate of a Manchester church. He became a bitter opponent of Wesley. The first letter was to a young man who wished to P 225 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS be a M e t h o d i s t preacher. Wesley sends h i m t o Richard Henderson, t h e chief preacher in t h e Wiltshire circuit. To a young Treacher. REDRUTH, September 9, 1765. M Y DEAR B R O T H E R , — I d o u b t very much whether either J e r e m y Coombs or Sister W e y worth spoke any such t h i n g . I advise you to go t o Mr. Henderson a n d relate t o h i m what you mentioned t o me. I have no objection t o your speaking a t those times a n d places which h e shall t h i n k proper. On t h e 23rd a n d 2 4 t h of next month (Wednesday and T h u r s d a y ) I expect, G o d willing, t o be a t Salisbury myself.—I a m , your affectionate brother. 6 I t might be productive of much Good.' To Mr. Stonehouse. NORWICH, October 31, 1784. MY DEAR BROTHER, — I had some doubt concerning another person; b u t I have none a t all concerning D r . Bailey [Bayley]. I believe his eye is single, a n d t h a t he has no other view, t h a n t h a t of promoting t h e glory of God. If, therefore, t h e steward and trustees, a n d upon m a t u r e consideration, j u d g e i t expedient t o invite D r . Bailey [Bayley] t o officiate every Sunday in t h e new chapel, I have no objection. I t seems t o me i t might be productive of much good.—I a m , your very affectionate brother. 6 If he sells Bread on the Lord's Day.' A little known l e t t e r 1 t o Thomas Carlill, one of Wesley's preachers, 1760-1801. H e was then superintendent of t h e wide Gainsborough circuit. ' W h e n guarded from exu1 From Arminian (Bible Christian) Magazine, 1827, p. 286, contributed to Wesley Historical Society's MSS. Journal. See Proceedings, vi. 92, 226 TO WRIDE AND OTHERS berant sallies of facetious wit, his discourses were judicious and profitable.' Simon Kilham of Epworth, Wesley's home town, 'who must not be removed,' was the father of the famous Methodist evangelist and reformer, Alexander Kilham, 1 whom Wesley this year called out to preach. Christie was a young preacher then resting at Grimsby. Wesley and the Methodists then and since 2 maintained the Puritan tradition in regard to Sunday. The ' p i e s ' were those of the poor who used the baker's oven in common. To Thomas Carlill. CORK, May 6th, 1785. DEAR TOMMY,—I desire you, and no other preacher out of the Gainsborough Circuit, to come to the Conference. I will pay the two guineas to Robert Armstrong. You may take brother Fish, in the place of Samuel Botts. Simon Kilham must in no wise be removed from Epworth. Encourage James Christie to read, and his gifts will increase. We cannot allow a baker to remain in our society if he sells bread on the Lord's day. But if he only bakes pies, as they call it, we do not exclude him: although we are convinced that to abstain even from this is the more excellent way.—I am, dear Tommy, your affectionate friend and brother. ' You are called to marry.5 A new letter to one of Wesley's preachers, the original of which is in the Rylands Library, Manchester. As allowances and houses for married preachers were matters arranged for the preachers by Wesley at his annual Conference, he 1 See p. 169. In 1803, when Napoleon threatened to invade England, they protested against Sunday drilling of soldiers, and secured exemption for those who objected. 2 287 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS needed to know early of these affairs. He took a close and practical interest in them. The letter is addressed to Stephens ' at the Preaching House in Cardiff? He was then in charge of the Glamorganshire circuit. To William Stephens. LONDON, October 3 1 , 1788. do well to write without disguise. Otherwise I should not be able to judge. As you state the matter, I cannot but agree with you that you are called to marry. But "'tis pity that you had not told me these things plainly before the Conference. Then I could have made the way plain for you, which now will be attended with some difficulty.—I am, dear Billy, your affectionate friend and brother. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—YOU ' A Little Difficulty on setting out is a Good Omen.' Joseph Burgess, or Burges, to whom this hitherto unpublished letter was sent, was a young preacher called out by the aged Wesley at this year's Conference—the last which he lived to see. Brother Clarke is Adam Clarke, then at Dublin. Mr. Philip Gentle, Plymouth, has the original of this letter. To Joseph Burgess. BRISTOL, August 22, 1790. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—You are called to do all the good you can for the present in Ireland ; by your staying there a little longer may be a blessing to many souls. I believe we can easily procure another preacher to supply your place at Liverpool a month or two. So you need be in no pain upon that account. A little difficulty on setting out is a good omen! 228 TO WRIDE AND OTHERS Wishing all happiness to you and yours.—I am, dear Joseph, your affectionate brother. I hope Brother Clarke and his family are well. ' Whoever undertakes to baptize is excluded.5 Wesley still hesitated to allow his preachers to give the sacraments to his followers. He always insisted upon them duly receiving these symbols ordained by our Lord. In due time he made provision for the administration of them by ordaining some of his preachers, not only to preach, but for this duty, in America, Scotland, and England. 1 The two following letters to preachers show these points. The first is a little known letter; the next is from the original in Victoria Methodist College, Toronto. Thompson was in charge of Hull circuit; Gordon, of Bath. To Joseph Thompson. EPWORTH, July 18, 1772. Michael 2 is not overcharged with wisdom is certain. But I do not know that he is a mischiefmaker. I t is your part to insist upon his keeping his round: to press the yearly collection in every place, and to see that all our rules be observed, whoever praises or blames. You have only to commend yourself to every man's conscience in the sight of God. DEAR JOSEPH,—That Whoever among us undertakes to baptize a child is ipso facto excluded from our Connexion.—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. 1 See A New History of Methodism, vol. i. pp. 230, 372 ; Wes. Hist, Soc. Proceedings, vol. ix. p. 145. 2 ? Michael Fenwick, see p. 220. 229 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS ' That young man who neglects the Lord's Supper.' To David Gordon. B A T H , February 29, 1788. am glad to find matters are not so bad as they were represented. As to preaching in the morning and meeting the leaders, I hope there has been no blame: and I trust you have not willingly neglected your circuit. It would be worth while to talk at large with that young man who neglects the Lord's Supper. But if he obstinately persists in that neglect, you can't give him any more tickets for our society. Be exact in all things !—I am, dear David, your affectionate friend and brother. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—I ' Stewards are not to govern our Societies.' A new letter to Robert Costerdine. He was a preacher for fifty years (176&-181&), and now was superintendent of the Sheffield circuit. Wesley claims to open and shut the door to membership, and to hand the key to whom he wills. His example and instruction were often followed, sometimes with disastrous results. The first expulsion of members which he made twenty-eight years earlier than this were with 6 the consent and approbation of the members of the band society.''x To Robert Costerdine. NORWICH, February 18, 1769. M Y BEAR BROTHER,—If Jer. Cocker now lives in any known sin, he must not be in our society. If he does not, you did not act wisely in putting him out of it. Stewards are not to govern our societies; it is no part of their office. 1 2$0 Journal, vol. ii. p. 430. TO WRIDE AND OTHERS This belongs to the assistant only under my direction. I myself directed before that Jer. Cocker should have another trial. And you did not do well in running your head against me to please any man living. I say again, unless he now lives in sin, give him another trial.—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. I am returning to London. ' I blame all when they speak the Truth other than in Love.5 This letter, little known, supplies an item in the gap in Wesley's Journal, September 1 to 27, in this year. A facsimile is in the possession of the Rev. J. G. Williams of Diss. Alexander Clark, of Chancery Lane, Dublin, was probably steward of the Methodist society in that city, as when Wesley wrote to him five years earlier.1 ' My Lady ' is Lady Huntingdon. Richard Boardman had returned from America, and was labouring in Cork. To Mr. Alexander Clark. BRADFORD, [ W I L T S ] , September 9, 1777. is certain our preachers have a right to preach our doctrines, as my lady's have to preach theirs. None can blame them for this. But I blame all even that speak the truth otherwise than in love. Keenness of spirit and tartness of language are never to be commended. I t is only in meekness that we are to instruct those that oppose themselves. But we are not allowed upon any account whatever to return evil for evil, or railing for railing. I have desired Mr. Boardman to be in Dublin as soon as possible. I believe you know his spirit. He is a loving, peaceable man. M Y DEAR BRETHREN,—It 1 Tyerman, Wesley, vol. iii. p. 127. 231 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Meantime in your patience possess ye your souls.—I am, my dear brethren, your affectionate brother. ' Talk against the Church.' This letter, believed to be a new one, from the original in the Library of Drew Methodist Episcopal Theological Seminary, Madison, New Jersey, confirms others as to Wesley's views at this time concerning the attitude of Methodists, in England, towards the Established Church. I t also gives us Wesley's proposed journeys for ten days in March, 1784, when he was eighty-one years of age. His Journal shows that he carried out his plans. The days were crowded with his beloved toil, from five o'clock in the morning until late at night. To whom the letter was written has not been traced. To an unnamed Inquirer. BRISTOL, March 4, 1784. DEAR BILLY,—I desire Mrs. Wright (?), if any of our lay preachers talk to her in public or private against the Church, or the clergy, or reading the Church prayers, or baptizing children, she require a promise from them to do it no more. I t they will not promise it, then preach no more; and if they break their promise, let them be expelled the society. From Macclesfield I expect to go to Chester, Monday, April 5 t h ; on Wednesday, the 7th, to Liverpool; Good Friday, April 9th, Warrington; Saturday, 10th, Manchester ; Tuesday, 18th, Bolton; Thursday, 15th, Wigan. I am, dear Billy, your affectionate brother. 6 H e did no more than it was his Duty to do.5 A hitherto unpublished letter, from the original in the John Rylands Library, Manchester, concerning Richard 232 TO WRIDE AND OTHERS Cundy. He was one of Wesley's preachers, 1776-1803. He was now labouring at Waterford, Ireland, and Wesley stands by him as having done his duty there. Henry Moore, who thought with Wesley in this, was Wesley's devoted friend and biographer. To R. Tegworth, Waterford, LONDON, February 28, 1789. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—Henry Moore and I, after reading and considering both your letter and one from Richard Cundy, are clearly of opinion, that he cannot and ought not to leave Waterford till another assistant comes to take his place. W e do not consider him to be in any fault in the matter. We think he did no more than it was his duty to do.—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. ' I can trust you, even in so critical a Case.' I t is good to give as the last letter selected from those by Wesley to his preachers on their work, this which shows his characteristic treatment of an able young worker. Thomas Roberts began his lengthy ministry in 1786, and was now of four years'standing only. But Wesley, now eighty-seven, finding in him fitness and cause for confidence and friendship, honours him by responsibility and opportunity. From the post of third preacher in the large Bristol circuit he is lifted to the charge of ; assistant' to Wesley, as superintendent of ' the most important circuit in all Wales.' Our letter, with corrections and additions to the text before published, is from the original in the Public Library, Copley Square, Boston, Mass. Curiously, Wesley wrote the year 1792 at the head of the letter. He died in 1791. Its year was 1790. This is shown by his itinerary, his references here to places and preachers, and by his Minutes of Conference. 233 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS To Thomas Roberts. HAVERFORDWEST, August 13, 1790. I shall make a trial of you, whether I can fit you or no. Since I came hither I have been much concerned. This is the most important circuit in all Wales. But it has been vilely neglected by the late assistant, James Hall, whom therefore I can trust no more. I can trust you, even in so critical a case. I desire, therefore, that (whoever opposes) you will set out immediately, and come hither as soon as ever you can. I wish you could meet me at Cardiff or Cowbridge. You see, by the printed plan, when I am to be at either of those places. If you have not notice soon enough to do this, try to meet me to-morrow se'nnight at the New Passage, 1 unless you can get a passage by the weekly boat to Swansea. If it be possible, do not fail. It may be, this may be the beginning of a lasting friendship between you and, dear Tommy, your affectionate friend and brother. DEAR TOMMY,—Now If you come, you are to act as assistant. ' Does Nobody care for this ?' These letters to some preachers of the rank and file may be closed by Wesley's appeal on behalf of one of them. As here seen, Wesley directed, trained, and controlled his preachers with discrimination, firmness, and patience, and when it was deserved he administered sharp discipline. But he was not a martinet. He was considerate, and never cast any aside. As Napoleon said,' We were at Toulon together,' as reason for response to frequent appeals, so Wesley felt and urged the claim of his helpers to grateful remembrance ; even when, as in this case of William Shent, they had fallen into sin and, under its grim shadow, suffering. Shent was a 1 234 I.e. over the River Severn, now called Redwick, near Bristol. TO WRIDE AND OTHERS Leeds barber, who was for many years a 6 half-itinerant' preacher. Happy man to have Wesley as advocate in such a brief as this letter ! I t is unequalled in its kind. Wesley also proposed to give as much help as any Leeds Methodist gave, and he found Shent a post at his London bookroom. To the Methodist Society in Keighley. LONDON, January 11^ 1779. I have a few questions, which I desire may be proposed to the society at Keighley. Who was the occasion of the Methodist preachers first setting foot in Leeds ? William Shent. Who received John Nelson into his house at his first coming thither ? William Shent. Who was it that invited me, and received me when I came ? William Shent. Who was it that stood by me when I preached in the street, with stones flying on every side ? William Shent. Who was it that bore the storm of persecution for the whole town, and stemmed it at the peril of his own life ? William Shent. Whose word did God bless for many years in an eminent manner? William Shent's. By whom were many children now in Paradise begotten in the Lord, and many now alive ? William Shent. Who is he that is ready now to be broken up and turned into the street ? William Shent. And does nobody care for this ? William Shent fell into sin, and was publicly expelled the society; but must he be also starved ? Must he with his grey hairs and all his children be without a place to lay his head ? Can you suffer this ? Oh, tell it not in Gath ! Where is gratitude ? Where is compassion ? Where is Christianity ? Where is humanity ? Where is concern for the cause of God ? Who 235 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS is a wise man among you ? Who is concerned for the Gospel? Who has put on bowels of mercy? Let him arise and exert himself in this matter. You here all arise as one man, and roll away the reproach. Let us set him on his feet once more. I t may save both him and his family. But what we do, let it be done quickly. I am, dear brethren, your affectionate brother. 236 CHAPTER VII TO AMERICAN AND CANADIAN METHODISTS AND CONCERNING THEM has a peculiar proprietary claim on Wesley's memory,' said President Roosevelt on the bi-centenary of Wesley's birth (1903), ' for it is on our continent that the Methodist Church has received its greatest development.' The first Conference after Wesley's death (1791) recorded that in the United States there were 57,621 Methodist members, and 6,525 in Canada and the West Indies. 1 The letters of this chapter were sent by Wesley to some of those who laid the lines for this vast, ever-growing work in the North American continent. They are here given in chronological order, and form an almost continuous series of Wesley's messages, with one significant interval, until his death. They have not before been gathered together. Some are new or little known. Methodism began in America in 1766 by the work of Irish emigrants—Mrs. Barbara Heck and Philip Embury in New York, and Robert Strawbridge in Maryland. Rays before this sunrise came from the early work of Wesley himself in Georgia in 1735, and of Whitefield in 1739 and onwards. The ]attersaid,' The good John Wesley has done in America is inexpressible. His name is very precious among the people, and he has laid a foundation.' Nathanael Gilbert is sometimes styled ' the first Methodist in America.' 'AMERICA 1 Minutes, 1791, 1812 ed., vol. i. p. 244. enrolled members in United States, 7,640,098 Canada more than one-seventh of the entire adherents. 6 Census of 1911, 14*99 per cent, of Year-Book) p. 201, New York, 1915). Statistics for 1914 were: ; in Canada, 359,137. In population arc Methodist the population ' {Methodist JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS He visited Wesley in England, and, returning to his home in Antigua, West Indies, in 1759, began the work there. The earliest of Wesley's letters we trace to workers in this great western sphere is one to Lawrence Coughlan. It suitably stands first, for Coughlan was in Newfoundland, Canada, in 1765, 1 and probably began Methodist work there rather earlier than Embury did in New York (1766). One of Wesley's Irish preachers, and ordained by a Greek bishop, Coughlan was re-ordained by the Bishop of London, and resumed work in Newfoundland in 1767 as a missionary of the Church of England Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts. However, he was always a Methodist in teaching and practice; as he wrote later to Wesley, ' I am and do confess myself a Methodist.' 6 That Perfection which I have taught these Forty Years.' In this beautiful and trenchant letter Wesley instructs Coughlan on the Methodist doctrine of Christian Perfection. This was to receive luminous exposition and exemplification among transatlantic Methodists. To the Rev, Lawrence Coughlan. August, 1768. DEAR LAWRENCE,—By a various train of providences you have been led to the very place where God intended you should be. And you have reason to praise Him, that He has not suffered your labour there to be in vain. In a short time how little will it signify whether we had lived in the Summer Islands or beneath e The rage of Arctos and eternal frost !' 2 1 See Coughlan's Work of God in Newfoundland, Sutherland's Methodism in Canada, and Atmore's Memorial. 2 Wesley is thinking of Coughlan's winter conditions, and quotes from Prior's Solomon, i. 266 : * If any suffer on the polar coast The;rage of Arctos and eternal frost.5 Samuel Wesley, Jun., and John and Charles Wesley were great admirers 238 TO AMERICAN METHODISTS How soon will this dream of life be at an end! And when we are once landed in eternity, it will be all one whether we spent our time on earth in a palace or had not where to lay our head. You never learned, either from my conversation, or preaching, or writings, that ' holiness consisted in a flow of joy.' I constantly told you quite the contrary; I told you it was love; the love of God and of our neighbour; the image of God stamped on the heart; the life of God in the soul of man; the mind that was in Christ, enabling us to walk as Christ also walked. If Mr. Maxfield, or you, took it to be anything else, it was your own fault, not mine. And whenever you waked out of that dream you ought not to have laid the blame of it on me. It is true that joy is one part of c the fruit of the Spirit," of the kingdom of God within us. But this is first ' righteousness,' then ' peace," and 'joy in the Holy Ghost." It is true further, that if you love God ' with all your heart" you may 'rejoice evermore." Nay, it is true still further, that many serious, humble, sober-minded believers who do feel the love of God sometimes, and do then rejoice in God their Saviour, cannot be content with this; but pray continually, that He would enable them to love, and * rejoice in the Lord always.' And no fact under heaven is more undeniable, than that God does answer this prayer; that He does, for the sake of His Son, and through the power of His Spirit, enable one and another so to do. It is also a plain fact, that this power does commonly overshadow them in an instant; and that from that time they enjoy that inward and outward holiness to which they were utter strangers before. Possibly you might be mistaken in this; perhaps you thought you of Prior, and wrought up many of his phrases into their poems and hymns. See many references in articles, 'Wesleyan Hymn-Book Illustrated/ by J. W. Thomas, in Wesleyan Methodist Magazine; 1871 et seq, ; and Rev. Henry Bett's Hymns of Methodism in their Literary Relations. 289 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS had received what you had not. But pray do not measure all men by yourself; do not imagine you are the universal standard. If you deceived yourself (which yet I do not affirm), you should not infer that all others do. Many think they are justified and are not; but we cannot infer that none are justified. So neither, if many think they are ' perfected in love/ and are not, will it follow that none are, so. Blessed be God, though we set a hundred enthusiasts aside, we are still ' encompassed with a cloud of witnesses/ who have testified, and do testify, in life and death, that perfection which I have taught these forty years! This perfection cannot be a delusion unless the Bible be a delusion too ; I mean, 6 loving God with all our heart, and our neighbour as ourselves.' I pin down all its opposers to this definition of it. No evasion! No shifting the question! Where is the delusion of this ? Either you received this love or you did not. If you did, dare you call it a delusion ? You will not call it so for all the world. If you received anything else, it does not at all affect the question. Be it as much a delusion as you please, it is nothing to them who have received quite another thing, namely, that deep communion with the Father and the Son, whereby they are enabled to give Him their whole heart; to love every man as their own soul, and to walk as Christ also walked. O Lawrence, if Sister Coughlan and you ever did enjoy this, humble yourselves before God for casting it away; if you did not, God grant you may ! < I may pay another Visit to the New World/ At the next Methodist Conference (1769) Wesley said, We have a pressing call from our brethren at New York (who have built a preaching-house1) to come over and help 4 1 240 Wesley sent money, books, and a clock—a characteristic gift. TO AMERICAN METHODISTS them. Who is willing to go ?' Two preachers, Joseph Pilmoor and Richard Boardman, 1 volunteered, were appointed and sent, and a collection was made to assist their work. On reaching Philadelphia, Captain Thomas Webb and a hundred Methodists welcomed them. W e b b 2 was from Bristol, the western port and gate of England, by this and many events closely associated with the New World. Portland Chapel in that city keeps, his memory green. There and in America he was a powerful Methodist preacher and pioneer. Professor J. A. Faulkner 3 declares that 'aside from the mere question of priority, this old soldier must be considered the principal founder of the American Methodist Church.' Aggressive Christianity in the New World had now again the powerful aid of George Whitefield.4 He was on his seventh and last preaching tour in America. Wesley's hopes here expressed were doomed to disappointment. Whitefield died at Newburyport, thirty-five miles from Boston, Mass., on September SO following this letter, and was buried there. 5 The counsels here given by Wesley to his dear friend and old time leader in the transforming open-air work of early Methodism, concerning efforts for Christ's little ones and the ethics of philanthropic finance are weighty. Wesley wished strongly to visit his workers in America. He never did so. England needed him ; and he knew that his friends, had he breathed his purpose, would have lovingly prevented him. ' If I go to America,'' he said, ' I must do a thing which I hate as bad as I hate the devil.' ' What is that ?' he was asked. ' I must keep a secret? was his reply. 1 See Lockwood's Western Pioneers—'based on Pilmoor's Journals. See below, p. 244. Wesley's letter to Pitt on his behalf is given on p. 483. 8 In A New History of Methodism, vol. ii. p. 59. 4 See above, p. 102. 8 In the Old South Presbyterian Church, Newburyport, Mass. ' I envy America the possession of the remains of dear George Whitefield ; but perhaps it is appropriate that while England claims the dust of Wesley, the great republic should be the guardian of the dust of his holy brother.' An * Englishman,' quoted by Rev. T. E. Brigden in Hurst's History of Methodism, p. 842. 2 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS To Rev. George Whitefield. LEWISHAM, February 2 1 , 1770. Keen informed me some time since of your safe arrival in Carolina; of which, indeed, I could not doubt for a moment, notwithstanding the idle report of your having been cast away, which was so current in London. I trust our Lord has more work for you to do in Europe, as well as in America. And who knows but before your return to England, I may pay another visit to the New World ? I have been strongly solicited by several of our friends in New York and Philadelphia. They urge many reasons, some of which appear to be of considerable weight; and my age is no objection at all; for I bless God my health is not barely as good, but abundantly better in several respects, than when I was five-and-twenty. But there are so many reasons on the other side, that, as yet, I can determine nothing; so I must wait for further light. Here I am ; let the Lord do with me as seemeth Him good. For the present, I must beg of you to supply my lack of service by encouraging our preachers as you judge best (who are as yet comparatively young and inexperienced), by giving them such advices as you think proper; and, above all, by exhorting them not only to love one another, but, if possible, as much as lies in them, to live peaceably with all men. Some time ago, since you went hence, I heard a circumstance which gave me a good deal of concern, namely, that the college or academy in Georgia had swallowed up the orphan house. Shall I give my judgement without being asked ? Methinks, friendship requires that I should. Are there not then two points which come in view ? a point of mercy and a point of justice ? With respect to the former, may it not be inquired, Can anything on earth be a greater 24$ M Y DEAR BROTHER,—Mr. TO AMERICAN METHODISTS charity than to bring up orphans ? What is a college or an academy compared to this ? unless you could have such a college as perhaps is not upon earth. I know the value of learning, and am more in danger of prizing it too much than too little; but still, I cannot place the giving it to five hundred students on a level with saving the bodies, if not the souls too, of five hundred orphans. But let us pass from the point of mercy to that of justice. You had land given, and collected money, for an orphan house. Are you at liberty to apply this to any other purpose ? at least, while there are any orphans in Georgia left ? I just touch upon this, though it is an important point, and leave it to your own consideration, whether part of it, at least, might not properly be applied to carry on the original design ? In speaking thus freely, on so tender a subject, I have given you a fresh proof of the sincerity with which I am. Your ever affectionate friend and brother. € I let you loose on the great Continent of America.' To another loud call for help in America in 1771, Wesley sent Richard Wright and Francis Asbury. The former did little there; Asbury became the Wesley of America. From the tiny port of Pill, near Bristol, with a suit of clothes and i?10 given by kindly Methodists of that city, he started for the far-spreading sphere where he would be in heroic journeyings, often long and perilous, and discharge the duties of overseer and wise, loving ruler with such devotion as won for him a place among the chiefest of the apostles.1 Ripe experience and more than a little masterfulness in Thomas Rankin, and choice gifts and a gracious temper in George Shadford, were sent to this work in 1773. Dr. J. M. Buckley says, ' There is nothing in the 1 See The Heart of Asbury1}sJournal, by President E« S, Tipple, Ph.D., D.D.,LL.D. 248 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS records of early Methodism which exhibits the sublimity of the conceptions of Wesley concerning the work and his relation to it more dramatically than his letter to Shadford.'' To George Shadford. [March], 1773. time is arrived for you to embark for America. You must go down to Bristol, where you will meet with Thomas Rankin, Captain Webb and his wife. I let you loose, George, on the great continent of America. Publish your message in the open face of the sun, and do all the good you can. I am, dear George, Yours affectionately. DEAR GEORGE,—-The 6 Go on hand in hand, . . . trusting in Him that loves you, to overturn America.' Where is Captain Webb ? Wesley asks. I t was an anxious time for British soldiers. This was the month of the Tea Riots in Boston. The foolish insistence by Great Britain on taxation without representation led to riot and rebellion, and at length to the assertion of American Independence. Moreover, many American Methodists were anticipating the liberty Wesley afterwards granted. They claimed the sacrament at the hands of their ministers, and were adapting their plans to the novel and clamant needs of their work. In this new letter, from the Everett Collection, Wesley counsels Rankin, resident at Philadelphia, and superintendent of the American work. He had presided at the first Conference of American Methodists held on the 14th July of this year. The second Conference Wesley refers to in his letter next to this. Robert Williams 1 is distinguished as the first publisher of Meohodist literature in America, where that arm of the 1 244 A New History of Methodism> vol. ii. pp. 6$, 74. TO AMERICAN METHODISTS church was to become mighty indeed. 1 He began by issuing some of Wesley's Servians; now he is to publish the famous Notes on the New Testament To Thomas Rankin. LONDON, December 4, 1773. Webb does not wilfully tell lies, but he speaks incautiously, so that we must make large allowance for this whenever he speaks, otherwise we shall be deceived. But where is he now, and what is he doing ? I fear his wife will have need of patience. , If you suffer anyone to remain a leader who does not stay at the society, that will be your fault. Improper leaders are not to be suffered upon any account whatever. You must likewise deal honestly with the societies, whether they will hear, or whether they will forbear. Only do not tell them continually ' You are de,ad,' for that will surely make them so. Endeavour to quicken their hope, by speaking strongly, and at the same time cheerfully. Exhort them to look for better days, yea, such as they have never seen yet. I judge George Shadford will do good at New York. So would Robert Williams for a little time. You have hurt yourself by giving way to reasoning, and, if you don't take care, you will hurt others. There has been good, much good done in America, and would have been abundantly more had brothers Boardman and Pilmoor continued genuine Methodists, both in doctrine and discipline. It is your part to supply what was wanting in them. Therefore are you sent. Let brothers Shadford, Asbury, and you go on hand in hand, and who can stand against you ? Why, you are enough, trusting in Him that loves you, to overturn America. Go on in His name and in DEAR TOMMY,—-Captain 1 Militant Methodism, p. 232 (New York : Methodist Book Concern), and my article, 'Impressions of Transatlantic Methodism,' United Meth. Mag., 1915, p. 153. 245 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS the power of His might, and all your enemies shall be found liars. Read David Brainerd again, and see your pattern ! He was a good soldier of Jesus. Ah ! but he first suffered, and then saw the fruit of his labour. Go and do likewise ! I have written to Robert Williams and given him leave to print the Notes on my account; nothing on his own. I never knew he did till afterward. Be of good courage! Strengthen yourself in the Lord and you will see good days, and will send better news to, dear Tommy, your affectionate friend and brother.' 4 Your little Conference in Philadelphia.5 To Thomas RanJcm. EPWORTH, July 21, 1774. yours of May 80th, you give me an agreeable account of your little Conference in Philadelphia. I think G. Shadford and you desire no novelties, but love good old Methodist discipline and doctrine. I have been lately thinking a good deal on one point wherein, perhaps, we have all been wanting. We have not made it a rule, as soon as ever persons were justified, to remind them of going on to perfection. Whereas, this is the very time preferable to all others. They have then the simplicity of little children ; and they are fervent in spirit, ready to cut off the right hand, or pluck out the right eye. But, if we once suffer this fervour to subside, we shall find it hard enough to bring them again to this point.—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. DEAR TOMMY,—In Letters to Rankin and others in a critical Year. The following seven letters to Thomas Rankin, two to James Dempster, one to John King, and one to 246 TO AMERICAN METHODISTS 6 All the Preachers' were all sent in that troublous year, 1775. In England, Chatham's pleadings and plans for conciliating the New England colonists were rejected. Americans, under George Washington, besieged Boston, and fought victoriously the battle of Bunker's Hill, Boston. In the next year they signed the Declaration of Independence. One of the noblest and most powerful of all Wesley's letters was sent by him at this crisis to the Premier, Lord North, 1 advising gentle measures and predicting the results of harsher ones, which, unfortunately, were adopted. But Wesley read a foolish pamphlet by Dr. Samuel Johnson, for once a martinet or worse, entitled Taxation no Tyranny. This changed Wesley's views. He issued it under the curious title, A Calm Address to our American Colonies. It had much influence,2 and a large circulation. In the last of these letters to Rankin (page 255) he refers with annoyance to this popularity. His pamphlet and new attitude involved him in a rancorous controversy, and brought peril to his preachers and followers in America. He hoped to undo some of the mischief by ' an interview with a great man'—probably Lord North. Certainly the letter above referred to was sent to him during these historic events. I t was good that Asbury either did not know, or declined to obey Wesley's requests backed by Rankin's arrangements, that he should return to England at this crisis. Had he done so, American Methodism would have been very different, most probably sadly other than it is. Who was i poor T. R.' ? His sad figure is drawn again and again in these letters. Wesley's love for human souls was that divine combination of undying interest in all and in each. He was in the midst of national and international turmoil, and writes for thousands of his followers in Rankin's charge; but Wesley is tenderly solicitous for one lost sheep, and with Christlike patience, never despairing, he sends the under shepherd after it and is sure it will yet be brought 1 2 Given below, p. 473. The Government ordered copies to be given away at church doors in London, and a high officer of State proffered services to Wesley or his people, and left behind him ^ 5 0 from the Privy Purse.—Tyerman's Wesley, vol. iii. p. 191. 247 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS home with rejoicing. A pearl is that word by Wesley (page 256): ' nothing but his despair of conquering can utterly destroy him.' ' I advise Brother Asbury to return to England.' To Thomas Rankin, LONDON, March 1, 1775. DEAR TOMMY,—I think the March packet will do as well as the April packet; so I answer you without delay. As soon as possible you must come to a clear and full explanation, both with brother Asbury (if he be recovered) and with Jemmy Dempster. But I advise brother Asbury to return to England the first opportunity. There is now a probability that God will hear the prayer and turn the counsels of Ahithophel into foolishness. It is not unlikely that peace will be re-established between England and the colonies. But certainly the present doubtful situation of affairs may be improved to the benefit of many. They may be strongly incited now ' to break off their sins by repentance, if it may be a lengthening of their tranquillity.''—I am, my dear Tommy, your affectionate friend and brother. P.$.—To-morrow I intend to set out for Ireland. € In so critical a Situation . . . it is your Part to be Peacemakers.' To all the Preachers. LONDON, March 1, 1775. M Y DEAR BRETHREN,—You were never in your lives in so critical a situation as you are at this time. It is your part to be peacemakers; to be loving and tender to all; but to 348 TO AMERICAN METHODISTS addict yourselves to no party. In spite of all solicitations, of rough or smooth words, say not one word against one or the other side. Keep yourselves pure; do all you can to help and soften all; but beware how you adopt another's jar. See that you act in full union with each other: this is of the utmost consequence. Not only let there be no bitterness or anger, but no shyness or coldness, between you. Mark all those that would set one of you against the other. Some such will never be wanting. But give them no countenance; rather ferret them out, and drag them into open day. The conduct of T. Rankin has been suitable to the MetliTodist plan ; I hope all of you tread in his steps. Let your eye be single. Be in peace with each other, and the God of peace will be with you.—I am, my dear brethren, your affectionate brother. ' I am sorry for poor T. R.? To Thomas RanJrin. PORTARLINGTON, April 2 1 , 1775. am glad there is so good an understanding between Jemmy Dempster and you. He is an upright man, and unless I am much mistaken, a friend both to the Methodist doctrine and discipline. I am sorry for poor T. R. It is certain God did lift up his head; and I hoped that his besetting sin would no more gain dominion over him. However, you must in no.wise give him up. And he has much more need of comfort than of reproof. His great danger is despair. Brother Asbury has sent me a few lines, and I thank him for them. But I do not advise him to go to Ai?tigua. Let him come home without delay. If one or two stout, healthy young men would willingly offer themselves to that service 849 DEAR TOMMY,—I JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS I should have no objection; but none should go unless he was fully persuaded in his own mind. You are a bold man, Tommy, to commence author in these critical times. I wish the success may answer your expectation; there is a call for every help. I am afraid you will soon find a day of trial; the clouds are black both over England and America, and if the storm once begins in America, it will soon spread to Great Britain. I have a friendly letter from ——, who writes warmly against the . Pray remember my love to him and his wife. I am glad to find he is still walking in the good old way. He sends me word that one or two men of fortune are gone out to preach the gospel. If they are, I expect little from them. God hath chosen the weak to confound the strong.—I am, dear Tommy, your affectionate friend and brother. ' Wherever War breaks out, God is forgotten.' To Thomas Rankin. BALLINROBE, May 19, 1775. letters travel very slow from us to America is a great inconvenience. But it is a still greater, that they travel so uncertainly; sometimes reaching you too late, sometimes not at all. I doubt not but brother Asbury and you will part friends: I shall hope to see him at the Conference. He is quite an upright man. I apprehend, he will go through his work more cheerfully when he is within a little distance from me. We must speak the plain truth, wherever we are, whether men will hear or whether they will forbear. And among our societies we must enforce our Rules, with all mildness and steadiness. A t first, this must appear strange to those who are as bullocks unaccustomed to the yoke. But after a 250 DEAR TOMMY,—That TO AMERICAN METHODISTS time, all that desire to be real Christians see the advantage of it. I am afraid Mr. B - — - is a weak brother, a little enlightened in his understanding, and having a kind of faith. But I would rather (of the two) be in the case of poor T. R. than of him. I think there is more probability of his being a real Christian, than of the other's. Never was there a time when it was more necessary for all that fear God, both in England and America, to stir up the gift of God that is in them, and wrestle with God in mighty prayer. In all the other judgements of God, the inhabitants of the earth learn righteousness. When a land is visited with famine, or plague, or earthquake, the people commonly see and acknowledge the hand of God. But wherever war breaks out, God is forgotten, if He be not set at open defiance. What a glorious work of God was at Cambuslang and Kilsythe, from 1740 to 1744! But the war that followed tore it all up by the roots, and left scarce any trace of it behind; insomuch that when I diligently enquired a few years after, I could not find one that retained the life of God!—I am, my dear Tommy, your affectionate friend and brother. ' By every possible means, oppose a Party Spirit.' Two letters to James Dempster, a preacher whom Wesley called out in 1765 and who was now in America, give counsel like that urged upon Rankin and all the preachers. Dempster, like Asbury, found Rankin's rule somewhat irksome, as Wesley's letters to the latter show. As in the letters of August 13 and October £0, Wesley here makes striking reference to his all but fatal attack of fever in June of this year. For three days he was very near death; indeed his decease was announced. It was one of many illnesses he suffered.1 1 See above, p. 7. 251 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS To James Dempster. BALLINROBE, May 19, 1775. DEAR JEMMY,-—That one point, I earnestly recommend, both to brother Rankin and you and all our preachers—by prayer, by exhortation, and by every possible means, to oppose a party spirit. This has always, so far as it has prevailed, been the bane of all true religion ; more especially when a country was in such a situation as America is now. None but the God of almighty love can extricate the people out of the snare. O what need have you to besiege His throne with all the power of prayer.—I am, dear Jemmy, yours affectionately. ' I was at the Gates of Death/ To James Dempster. Near LEEDS, July 28, 1775. DEAR JEMMY,—Last month I was at the gates of death. But it pleased God just then to rebuke the fever, so that my pulse began to beat again, after it had totally ceased. Since that time I have gradually been recovering strength, and am now nearly as well as ever. Let us use the short residue of life to the glory of Him that gave it!—I am, yours affectionately. ' Scream no more, at the Peril of your Soul!' From general dangers which threatened the work in America, Wesley turns in this famous racy letter to those which affected John King, one of the eleven preachers appointed to labour under Rankin there. 1 Wesley was a less emotional preacher than his brother Charles, less 1 Curiously, Asbury is not named at all in the Minutes of Wesley's Conference at Leeds this year : 1812 edit., i. 252 TO AMERICAN METHODISTS vehement than Whitefield, and had proved the power of controlled, burning zeal. To Mr. John King. Near LEEDS, July 28, 1775. take advice or reproof as a favour : it is the surest mark of love. I advised you once, and you took it as an affront: nevertheless I will do it once more. Scream no more, at the peril of your soul. God now warns you by me, whom He has set over you. Speak as earnestly as you can, but do not scream. Speak with all your heart; but with a moderate voice. It was said of our Lord, ' He shall not cry"*-, the word properly means, He shall not scream. Herein be a follower of me, as I am of Christ. I often speak loud ; often vehemently; but I never scream; I never strain myself; I dare n o t ; I know it would be a sin against God and my own soul. Perhaps one reason why that good man, Thomas Walsh, yea and John Manners too, were in such grievous darkness before they died, was because they shortened their own lives. O John, pray for an advisable and teachable temper ! By nature you are very far from i t : you are stubborn and headstrong. Your last letter was written in a very wrong spirit. If you cannot take advice from others, surely you might take it from your affectionate brother. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—Always * It will be seen what God will do with North America.' To Thomas Rankin. LONDON, August 13, 1775. DEAR TOMMY,—I do not give up T. R. yet; he is not out of God's reach. 253 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS I am not sorry that brother Asbury stays with you another year. In that time it will be seen what God will do with North America; and you will easily j udge whether our preachers are called to remain any longer therein. If they are, God will make their way plain, and give them favour even with the men that delight in war. In the civil wars of Rome, Atticus stood fair in the esteem of both the contending parties. And so did the Archbishop of Cambray, during the war in the Netherlands; not only the officers, but the common soldiers, when they went by, treating him with love and regard. The clouds do indeed gather more and more ; and it seems a heavy storm will follow; certainly it will, unless the prayers of the faithful obtain a longer reprieve. A few weeks ago, I was at the gates of death, in the north of Ireland. But 6 The fever felt His touch, and fled'; and I am now just as I was before it came. You did well to remove the books into a place of safety ; if any such can be found in America. I t is no wonder that the spirits of the men who know not God are sharpened into madness, that human creatures become lions and bears. This is the genuine fruit of war ! Certainly, if they persecute you in one city, you should flee to another. Peace be with your spirit!—I am, dear Tommys your affectionate friend and brother. * A little Tract. . . . Many would willingly burn me and it together.' To Thomas Rcmkm. LONDON, October 20, 1775. DEAR TOMMY,—The account given in our newspapers of my death was not wholly without foundation; for I was only 254 TO AMERICAN METHODISTS not dead, my pulse being quite gone, and 6 the wheel at the cistern without motion.' But then our Lord stepped in, and 'The fever owned His touch, and fled/ My strength returned by swift degrees; and I am now at least as well as before my illness. In the country places I believe you will have the largest harvest, where they know little and talk little about politics. Their hearts are engaged with something better, and they let the dead bury their dead. I am glad you are going into North Carolina; and why not into South Carolina too ? I apprehend those provinces would bear much fruit, as most parts of them are fresh, unbroken ground. And as the people are farther removed from the din of war, they may be more susceptible of the gospel of peace. A paper was sent to me lately, occasioned by the troubles in America; but it would not do good. I t is abundantly too t a r t ; and nothing of that kind will be of service now. All parties are already too much sharpened against each other. We must pour water, not oil, into the flame. I had written a little tract upon the subject before I knew the American ports were shut up. I think there is not one sharp word therein; I did not design there should be. However, many are excessively angry; and would willingly burn me and it together. Indeed it is provoking; I suppose above forty thousand of them have been printed in three weeks, and still the demand for them is as great as ever. I was glad to receive yours by Captain Crawford. I am entirely of your mind. I am persuaded love and tender measures will do far more than violence. And if I should have an interview with a great man (which seems to be not unlikely) I will, by the grace of God, tell him so, without any circumlocution. Our time is in God's hands: let us 255 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS stand ready for all things !—I am, dear Tommy, your affectionate friend and brother. 'The Sword is drawn . . . appoint in America Days of Fasting and Prayer.' Two days later Wesley suggested something like this in his letter to the British Premier. To Thomas RanMn. CLANMAIN 5 near ARMAGH^ June 13, 1775. DEAR TOMMY,—I am afraid our correspondence for the time to come will be more uncertain than ever; since the sword is drawn. And it is well if they have not on both sides thrown away the scabbard. What will the end of these things be, either in Europe or America ? I t seems huge confusion and distress, such as neither we nor our fathers had known ! But it is enough, if all issues in glory to God, and peace and good-will among men. I am sorry for poor T. R. I well hoped God had thoroughly healed his backsliding, and so lifted up his head that he would have fallen no more. But the case is not desperate yet. You must in nowise give him up. I have scarcely ever known an habitual drunkard finally reclaimed before he had relapsed more than once or twice. Your point is, first, save him from the occasions of sin; then incite him not to cast away hope. Nothing but his despair of conquering can totally destroy him. As long as he keeps up the faintest hope, he will strive against sin. My brother wrote me word that he had received a copy of the tract that you have written. Something of the kind may be very seasonable. Never had America such a call to repentance. For unless general reformation prevent general destruction, what a scene will soon be opened! Ruin and 256 TO AMERICAN METHODISTS desolation must soon overspread the land, and fair houses be turned into ruinous heaps. But what are those strange phenomena which you speak of? Send me an account of just so much as you can depend upon. Should not you appoint in America (as we do in England and Ireland) one or more general days of fasting and prayer ?—I am, dear Tommy, your affectionate friend and brother. ' The Temple is built even in troublous Times.' Wesley's fears that God might be utterly forgotten in war time were not all fulfilled ; but the gains were mainly in districts not much affected by the war. In England, Wesley was busy as ever at his proper work, but he was often drawn into the vortex of public affairs during the next few years. As in 1756, 1 he offered to raise some soldiers to aid the king. Writing to Joseph Benson in 1782, he told him that he did this * two or three years ago." This was probably in 1779, when France, Spain, and America were all in arms against Britain. It was proposed that the militia should be doubled. By the king's order the Secretary of State for War replied to Wesley that it was not necessary for him to do as he offers in this letter; if ever it should be necessary, the king would inform Wesley.2 To Thomas Rankin. Near LEEDS, July 28, 1775. DEAR TOMMY,—I rejoice to hear that the work of our Lord still prospers in your hands. If the temple is built even in troublous times, it is not by the power of man. I rejoice too over honest Francis Asbury, and hope he will no more enter into temptation. Do not despair of poor 1 2 See below, p. 470. The Methodists did raise a company of soldiers in Bristol early in the next century.—-Journal, note, vol. iv. p. 151. E 257 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS T. R. He is not out of God's reach yet. I know no reason why we should not print the names of the American preachers. You may print an edition of the Christian's Pattern,1 and apply the profits of it to the payment of the debt. The societies should pay the passage of the preachers. But you must not imagine that any more of them will come to America until these troubles are at an end. Certainly this is the point which we should insist upon, in season and out of season. The universal corruption of all orders and degrees of men loudly calls for the vengeance of God : Inasmuch as all other nations are equally corrupt, it seems God will punish us by one another. What can prevent this but a universal, or, at least, a general repentance? Otherwise we have great reason to fear God will soon say, ' Sword, go through that land, and destroy it.** Those clergymen should be lovingly advised not to hurt our preachers. I will pay your arrears. We have only to live to-day! God will take care of to-morrow.—I am, dear Tommy, your affectionate friend and brother. 6 1 have great Hopes we shall then be able to send you Assistance.' These letters here suffer interruption, as did the work of Wesley's followers in America, in consequence of the revolutionary war. Wesley made no appointments of preachers to this field from 1776, the year of the Declaration of Independence, until 1784, when they read thus in the Minutes of his Conference : ' America—Thomas Coke, Richard Whatcoat, T. Vasey.' As the war proceeded, the clergy of the church, and Rankin, and the Methodist preachers fled back to England—all except Asbury. He, sometimes in hiding, was waiting his chance to rebuild and extend Methodism, 1 Or A Treatise of the Imitation ofChrist,Wesley's version of De Imitatione Christi, by Thomas a Kempis; Wesley's third publication, first issued in 1735j and always very freely circulated by him. 258 TO AMERICAN METHODISTS and to serve the young struggling nation. His supremacy in the work was declared by the American Methodist Conference of 1779. Meanwhile, in parts of the field remote from the war, Methodism grew rapidly. In Nova Scotia, a young Yorkshireman, William Black,1 had gathered a goodly Methodist fellowship, and was anxious that Wesley would send other preachers to his aid. We give ten letters which Wesley sent to him. Later he became Methodist superintendent of the maritime provinces—Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Newfoundland. The vigorous letter written by Wesley in this connection to Bishop Lowth is given above (page 1^7). The 4 pious man' whom he refused to ordain was John Hoskins, a schoolmaster, whose ordination the people of Old Perlican, Newfoundland, requested through Wesley in I778-79. 2 Wesley cannot be accused of rashness. Gradually he was forced towards the decisive act of ordaining some of his preachers. The first of those so set apart were for this else neglected and pitifully needy American work. A minor difficulty, which Wesley frequently notes in his own administration of it, was the uncertainty of the postal service. To William Black. LONDON, February 2Q, 1783. did indeed very strongly expostulate with the Bishop of London concerning his refusing to ordain a pious man, without learning, while he ordained others that, to my knowledge, had no piety, and but a moderate share of learning. Our next Conference will begin in July ; and I have great hopes we shall then be able to send you assistance. One of our preachers informs me he is willing to go to any part of Africa or America. He does not regard danger or toil, M Y DEAR BROTHER,—I 1 His first letter to Wesley, a fine record of Christian effort by a youth of nineteen in his father's home at Amherst, Nova Scotia, is given by Wesley, •Journal, April 15, 1782. 2 Sutherland's Methodism in Canada, p. 106. 259 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS nor, indeed, does he count his life dear unto himself, so that he may testify the gospel of the grace of God, and win sinners to Christ. But I cannot advise any person to go alone. Our Lord sent his disciples two and two. And I do not despair of finding another young man, as much devoted to God as he. Of Calvinism, mysticism, and antinomianism, have a care, for they are the bane of true religion; and one or other of them has been the grand hindrance of the work of God, wherever it has broken out.—I am, my dear brother, yours affectionately. 6 Swift Increase is generally followed by Decrease equally swift.' To William Black, LONDON, July 13, 1783. is a rule with me to answer all letters which I receive. If, therefore, you have not received an answer to every letter which you have written, it must be either that your letter or my answer has been intercepted. I do not wonder at all that, after that great and extraordinary work of God, there should be a remarkable decay. So we have found it in almost all places. A swift increase is generally followed by a decrease equally swift. All we can do to prevent it is continually to exhort all who have tasted that the Lord is gracious to remember our Lord's words, ' Watch and ?pray that ye enter not into temptation.' The school at Kingswood is exceeding full; nevertheless there shall be room for you. And it is very probable, if you should live to return to Halifax, you may carry one or more preachers with you. I hope you will live as brethren, 260 M Y DEAR BROTHER,—It TO AMERICAN METHODISTS and have a free and open intercourse with each other.—I am, my dear brother, affectionately yours. ' See that ye fall not out by the Way.' To William Black. INVERNESS, May 11, 1784. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—I am glad you have given a little assistance to our brethren at Halifax, and along the coast. There is no charity under heaven to be compared to this,— the bringing light to the poor heathens that are called Christians, but, nevertheless, still sit in darkness and the shadow of death. I am in great hopes that some of the emigrants from New York are really alive to God. And, if so, they will every way be a valuable acquisition to the province where their lot is now cast. There is no part of Calvinism or antinomianism which is not fully answered in some part of our writings ; particularly in the ' Preservative against Unsettled Notions in Religion.''l I have no more to do with answering books. I t will be sufficient if you recommend to Mr. Alline's friends some of the tracts that are already written. As to himself, I fear he is wiser in his own eyes than seven men that can render a reason. The work of God goes on with a steady pace in various parts of England. But, still, the love of many will wax cold, while many others are continually added to supply their place. In the west of England, in Lancashire, and in Yorkshire, God still mightily makes bare His arm. He convinces many, justifies many, and many are perfected in love. My great advice to those who are united together, is, Let brotherly love continue! See that ye fall not out by 1 A volume of 246 pages, published by Wesley in 1758. 261 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS the way ! Hold the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace! Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ!—I am, your affectionate brother. 'My Scruples are at an E n d . . . . I violate no Order by appointing and sending Labourers into the Harvest.' Here is perhaps the most important and significant of all Wesley's many letters. I t is at once a letter, a manifesto, and an authority. I t records decisive acts which, with others of which Wesley was author, constituted his followers a church. Every word of this letter is significant, and has been so regarded by Wesley's friends and critics. It is the constitutional foundation of the great Methodist Churches of America. Wesley took the grave steps referred to in paragraph 4 of his letter quietly; 1 then he published this record and justification of them in the Minutes of his Conference (1785). He added this note, ' If anyone is minded to dispute concerning Diocesan Episcopacy, he may dispute. But I have better work.' It was time for action. Asbury's letter to Wesley pictured the spiritual destitution of North America, and asked that ministers and preachers should be sent. Coke co-operated with Wesley in carrying out the aged leader's proposal and decision to ordain the preachers here named for this work. Already an ordained clergyman, Coke accepted ordination 2 as a superintendent of it, with Asbury. The historic Conference of American Methodist preachers held in Baltimore at Christmas 1784, with this letter as authority and guide, constituted and organised the Methodist Episcopal Church in the United States of America.3 Coke and others duly ordained Asbury as deacon, elder, and superintendent. This followed upon the 1 The ordinations look place in his room at Dr. Castleman's, 6 Dighton Street, Bristol, very early on the morning of Sept. I, 1784. 2 For the text and a facsimile of the certificate of ordination see A New History of Methodism > vol. ii. p. 84. 3 The name is said to have been suggested by one of the preachers, John Dickens, a member of the Conference, formerly an Eton boy. 262 TO AMERICAN METHODISTS unanimous election of Coke and Asbury to the latter office, without which Asbury declined to accept appointment to it by Wesley. To Dr. Coke, Mr. Asbury, and our Brethren in North America. BRISTOL, September 10, 1784. By a very uncommon train of providences many of the provinces of North America are totally disjoined from their mother-country, and erected into independent States. The English Government has no authority over them, either civil or ecclesiastical, any more than over the States of Holland. A civil authority is exercised over them, partly, by the Congress, partly by the provincial Assemblies. But no one either exercises or claims any ecclesiastical authority at all. In this peculiar situation some thousands of the inhabitants of the States desire my advice; and in compliance with their desire I have drawn up a little sketch. % Lord King's ' Account of the Primitive Church' convinced me many years ago, 1 that bishops and presbyters are the same order, and consequently have the same rights to ordain. For many years I have been importuned, from time to time, to exercise this right, by ordaining part of our travelling preachers. But I have still refused, not only for peace'' sake, but because I was determined as little as possible to violate the established order of the national Church to which I belonged. 3. But the case is widely different between England and North America. Here there are bishops who have a legal jurisdiction : in America there are none, neither any parish DEAR BRETHREN,—1. 1 He read it on his way to Bristol on Monday, January 20, 1746. See his Journal, in loc. The change in his views, which this book largely contributed to, can be seen by comparing the above with those in his letter to Hall, three weeks before reading it (see Wesley's Journal, vol. iii. p. 229). 263 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS ministers. So that for some hundred miles together, there is none either to baptize, or to administer the Lord's Supper. Here, therefore, my scruples are at an end ; and I conceive myself at full liberty, as I violate no order, and invade no man's right, by appointing and sending labourers into the harvest. 4. I have accordingly appointed Dr. Coke and Mr. Francis Asbury to be joint superintendents over our brethren in North America; as also Richard Whatcoat and Thomas Vasey to act as elders among them, by baptizing and administering the Lord's Supper. And I have prepared a liturgy, little differing from that of the Church of England (I think the best constituted national Church in the world), which I advise all the travelling preachers to use, on the Lord's Day, in all the congregations, reading the Litany only on Wednesdays and Fridays, and praying extempore on all other days. I also advise the elders to administer the Supper of the Lord on every Lord's Day. 5. If any one will point out a more rational and scriptural way of feeding and guiding these poor sheep in the wilderness I will gladly embrace it. A t present, I cannot see any better method than that I have taken. 6. I t has, indeed, been proposed to desire the English bishops to ordain part of our preachers for America. But to this I object. (1) I desired the Bishop of London to ordain only one; but could not prevail. (2) If they consented, we know the slowness of their proceedings; but the matter admits of no delay. (3) If they would ordain them now, they would likewise expect to govern them. And how grievously would this entangle us ! (4) As our American brethren are now totally disentangled, both from the State and from the English hierarchy, we dare not entangle them again, either with the one or the other. They are now at full liberty, simply to follow the Scriptures and the 264 TO AMERICAN METHODISTS Primitive Church. And we judge it best that they should stand fast in that liberty, wherewith God has so strangely made them free. 'Is it not advisable that you act by united Counsels ?' Here Wesley seeks to knit up the work in the north-east provinces of Canada with that in the United States, for which Coke was carrying the constitution just given. As here counselled, Black met Coke, attended the decisive Conference at Baltimore at Christmas 1784, and received financial and ministerial help for his heroic, work in Nova Scotia. To John Stretton, an Irish Methodist, who has taken up the work in Newfoundland, now that Coughlan has left it, Wesley sends similar counsel and encouragement. To William Black. October 15., 1784. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—A letter of yours, some years ago, gave me hopes of meeting you in England; as you seemed desirous of spending some time here, to improve yourself in learning. But, as you have now entered into a different state, I do not expect we shall meet in this world. But you have a large field of action where you are, without wandering into Europe. Your present parish is wide enough, namely, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. I do not advise you to go any farther. In the United States, there are abundance of preachers. They can spare four preachers to you, better than you can spare one to them. If I am rightly informed, they have already sent you one or two ; and they may afford you one or two more, if it please God to give a prosperous voyage to Dr. Coke and his fellowlabourers. Does there not want a closer and more direct connection between you of the North, and the societies under 265 LONDON, JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Francis Asbury ? Is it not more advisable that you should have a constant correspondence with each other, and act by united counsels ? Perhaps it is for want of this that so many have drawn back. I want a more particular account of the societies in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. I am not at all glad of Mr. Scurr's intention to remove from Nova Scotia to the South. That is going from a place where he is much wanted, to a place where he is not wanted. I think, if he got i?10,000 thereby, it would be but a poor bargain; that is, upon the supposition, which you and I make, that souls are of more value than gold. Peace be with all your spirits !—I am, your affectionate brother. * Go on. . . . You shall want no Assistance.' To Mr. John Stretton. LONDON, February 2o} 1785. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—You did well in breaking through that needless diffidence. If you had written sooner, you would have heard from me sooner. Although I have not been at Limerick for some years, yet I remember your father and mother well. They truly feared God when I conversed with them. Be a follower of them, as they were of Christ. The last time I saw Mr. Coughlan he was ill in body, but in a blessed state of mind. He was utterly broken in pieces, full of tears and contrition for his past unfaithfulness. Not long after I went out of town God removed him to a better place. If that deadly enemy of true religion, Popery, is breaking in upon you, there is indeed no time to be lost; for it is far easier to prevent the plague than to stop it. Last autumn Dr. Coke sailed from England, and is now visiting the flock $66 TO AMERICAN METHODISTS in the midland provinces of America, and settling them on the New Testament plan, to which they all willingly and joyfully conform, being all united, as by one Spirit, so in one body. I trust they will no more want such pastors as are after God's own heart. After he has gone through these parts, he intends, if God permit, to see the brethren in Nova Scotia, probably attended with one or two able preachers, who will be willing to abide there. A day or two ago, I wrote and desired him before he returns to England, to call upon our brethren also in Newfoundland, and, perhaps, leave a preacher there likewise. About food and raiment, we take no thought. Our heavenly Father knoweth that we need these things, and He will provide. Only let us be faithful and diligent in feeding His flock. Your preacher will be ordained. Go on, in the name of the Lord, and in the power of His might! You shall want no assistance that is in the power of your affectionate friend and brother. ' The English Methodists do not roll in Money like many of the American Methodists.5 Freeborn Garrettson, now visiting William Black and assisting his work in Nova Scotia, was worthy the characteristic counsels and encouragements of this and six other letters to him which we give. The history of this American gentleman, quondam slave owner, an ordained Methodist preacher, often without fee or reward, second only to Asbury in devotion, is romantic. His character and work were heroic. The list of his sufferings in it recalls that Iliad of woes given by St. Paul to the Corinthians. 1 In the account of him which Coke gave to Wesley an item most grateful to both of them was that on the day following his conversion Garrettson had voluntarily set free all his slaves. How eager Wesley is to lay hands upon Garrettson's and 1 2 Cor. xi. 23 ; Garrettson's Life, by Bangs, chap, xi. 267 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Black's journals. He had the instincts of a bookman and a publisher. In a later letter (July 16, 1787) he tells some prices for printing and paper. By Garrettson he gives repeated warnings to rich Methodists. These were increasing among his followers, and were greatly to aid his work, profusely in America. Sharp rebukes of the love of money were more than ever a feature of the closing decade of his life. To Freeborn Garrettson. DUBLIN, June 16, 1785. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—Dr. Coke gives some account of you in his Journal ; so that, although I have not seen you, I am not a stranger to your character. By all means send me, when you have an opportunity, a more particular account of your experience and travels. I t is no way improbable that God may find out a way for you to visit England; and it may be the means of your receiving more strength, as well as more light. It is a very desirable thing that the children of God should communicate their experience to each other ; and it is generally most profitable when they can do it face to face. Till Providence opens a way for you to see Europe, do all you can for a good Master in America. I am glad Brother Cromwell and you have undertaken that ' labour of love' of visiting Nova Scotia; and doubt not but you act in full concert with the little handful who were almost alone till you came. . . . It will be the wisest way to make all those who desire to join together, thoroughly acquainted with the whole Methodist plan; and to accustom them, from the very beginning, to the accurate observance of all our rules. Let none of them rest in being half-Christians. Whatever they do, let them do it with all their might; and it will be well, as soon as any of them find peace with God, to exhort them to ' go on to perfection.' The more explicitly and strongly you press all believers to 268 TO AMERICAN METHODISTS aspire after full sanctification, as attainable now by simple faith, the more the whole work of God will prosper. I do not expect any great matters from the Bishop. I doubt his eye is not single ; and if it be not, he will do little good to you, or any one else. It may be a comfort to you that you have no need of him. You want nothing which he can give. I t is a noble proposal of Brother Marchington; but I doubt it will not take place. You do not know the state of the English Methodists. They do not roll in money, like many of the American Methodists. It is with the utmost difficulty that we can raise five or six hundred pounds a year to supply our contingent expenses; so that it is entirely impracticable to raise five hundred pounds among them to build houses in America. It is true they might do much ; but it is a sad observation, they that have most money have usually least grace. The peace of God be with all your spirits !—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. * The Poor are the Christians.' To Freeborn Garrettson. LONDON,, September 30,1786. trust before this comes to hand you and Dr. Coke will have met, and refreshed each other's bowels in the Lord. I can exceedingly ill spare him from England, as I have no clergyman capable of supplying his lack of service; but I was convinced he was more wanted in America than in Europe. For it is impossible but offences will come; and ' of yourselves will men arise speaking perverse things,' and striving ' to draw away disciples after them.'' I t is a wonderful blessing, they are restrained so long, till the poor people are a little grounded in the faith. 269 M Y DEAR BROTHER,—I JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS You have need to watch over them with your might. Let those that have set their hands to the plough continually c pray to the Lord of the harvest, that He would send forth more labourers into His harvest.' I t is far better to send your Journals as they are than not to send them at all. I am afraid it is too late in the season to send books this year; but I hope Dr. Coke has brought some with him to serve you for the present. I was far off from London when he set sail. Most of those in England who have riches love money, even the Methodists; at least those who are called so. The poor are the Christians. I am quite out of conceit with almost all those who have this world's goods. Let us take care to lay up our treasure in heaven. Peace be with your spirit!—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. * The Work of God continually increasing . . . you will now see in America.5 Fasting, which is self-sacrifice; prayer, without intermission ; expectancy and hopefulness, which never faint, are Wesley's conditions for continuous prosperity in Church work. Wesley looks back to that great year of Methodist origins, 1739, and across the wonderful years since then. To William Black. LONDON, November 26, 1786. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—It is indeed a matter of joy that our Lord is still carrying on His work throughout Great Britain and Ireland. In the time of Dr. Jonathan Edwards, there were several gracious showers in New England; but there were large intermissions between one and another : whereas, with us there has been no intermission at all for seven-and-forty years, but the work of God has been continually increasing. 270 TO AMERICAN METHODISTS The same thing, I am in hopes, you will now see in America likewise. See that you expect it, and that you seek; it in His appointed ways, namely, with fasting and unintermitted prayer. And take care that you be not at all discouraged, though you should not always have an immediate answer. You know c His manner and His times are best.' Therefore pray always ! Pray, and faint not. I commend you all to our Great Shepherd; and am, your affectionate brother. 6 You do well to join them together immediately/ In the New World as in the Old, Wesley will have his followers drawn into fellowship and built up in societies or churches. ' You cannot go to heaven alone,' was an early counsel which he received and never forgot. Much of Whitefield's fine work had failed of its best possibilities because organisation had been neglected. Wesley's inquiry about good ink is characteristic. That which he used has lasted well upon many thousands of pages, some of it for almost two centuries. To Freeborn Garrettson. [LOWESTOFT], November 30, 1786. have great reason to be thankful to God that He lets you see the fruit of your labours. Whenever any are awakened, you do well to join them together immediately. But I do not advise you to go on too fast. It is not expedient to break up more ground than you can keep; to preach at any more places than you or your brethren can constantly attend. To preach once in a place, and no more, very seldom does any good; it only alarms the devil and his children, and makes them more upon their guard against a first assault. 271 M Y DEAR BROTHER,—You JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Wherever there is any Church service, I do not approve of any appointment the same hour; because I love the Church of England, and would assist, not oppose, it all I can. How do the inhabitants of Shelburn, Halifax, and other parts of the province, go on as to temporal things ? Have they trade ? Have they sufficiency of food, and the other necessaries of life ? And do they increase or decrease in numbers ? I t seems there is a scarcity of some things,— of good ink, for yours is so pale that many of your words are not legible. As I take it for granted that you have had several conversations with Dr. Coke, I doubt not you proposed all your difficulties to him, and received full satisfaction concerning them. Commending you to Him who is able to guide and strengthen you in all things.—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. P.S.—Probably we shall send a little help for your building, if we live till Conference. Observe the rules for building laid down in the Minutes. I see nothing of your Journal yet. I am afraid of another American Revolution. I do not know how to get the enclosed to Dr. Coke : probably you know. On second thoughts I think it best not to write to him at present. ' I hear very different Accounts of your Provinces.' Wesley etches in a picture of difficulties and privations by sea and land encountered by his followers. Coke's second voyage to America was remarkable every way.1 Storms of exceptional fierceness fell upon the crazy boat. In the worst of them the superstitious captain paraded the deck muttering ' W e have a Jonah on board,'' rushed to Coke's cabin, flung his books and papers into the sea, and threatened him with the like fate. The ship could not 1 272 Life by Drew, p. 160. TO AMERICAN METHODISTS make Halifax, Nova Scotia, where William Black waited Coke and three English preachers appointed to help him. Changing her course completely, she reached Antigua, West Indies, on Christmas Day, 1786. Coke's arrival was regarded as a crowning mercy by Nathaniel Gilbert 1 and the two thousand Methodists there, colonists and negroes. John M'Geary, an Irish Methodist preacher, had succeeded Stretton in Newfoundland. He was partly to blame for the treatment he received. Although a good preacher, he seems to have been ' flighty and unstable to a degree/ Wesley sums him up in a later letter (p. 276). But, as we have seen,2 Wesley could not bear that his preachers should be treated with one whit less kindness than circumstances permitted. To William Black. LONDON, February 20, 1787. various unfortunate hindrances and delays, Dr. Coke embarked on board a small brig in the middle of October, and was, by furious winds, twice beat back into the harbour. They set sail a third time with a crazy, shattered vessel, on the 18th of October. We have not heard anything either from him or of him since. I hope you have heard of him in America. You have great reason to be thankful to God for the progress of His work in Nova Scotia. This i$ far from being the case in Newfoundland, where poor John M'Geary appears to be utterly discouraged; not only through want of success, but through want of the conveniences, yea, necessaries of life. Truly, if I could have supposed that those who made me fair promises would have suffered a preacher to want bread, I should have sent him into other parts, where he would have wanted nothing. I hear very different accounts of the state of your proM Y DEAR BROTHER,—After 1 See above, p. 237. s 2 See his letter concerning Shent on p. 235. 273 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS vinces. Is there plenty or scarcity in Nova Scotia and New England ? How does it fare with Halifax and Shelburn in particular ? Do the buildings and people increase or decrease ? Public accounts I cannot at all depend on, but upon your word I can depend. Peace be with all your spirits!—I am, dear Billy, your affectionate friend and brother. ' You do not send me your Journal yet.5 To Freeborn Garrettson. MACCLESFIELD, July 16, 1787. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—I have your letter of March 15, and that of May 20. In the former you give me a pleasing account of the work of God in Halifax and other towns in Nova Scotia, and indeed everywhere except poor Shelburn, from which I had an excellent account a few years ago, Shall the first be last ? What could have occasioned the decrease of the work there ? St. PauFs advice is certainly good for all Methodist preachers,—that ' it is good for a man not to touch a woman'; and ' if thou mayest be free, use it rather/ And yet I dare not exclude those who marry out of our Connexion, or forbid to marry; but happy are those who, having no necessity laid upon them, stand fast in the glorious liberty. I commend you for laying as little burden upon the poor people as possible. Before I had printing presses of my own,1 I used to pay two-and-thirty shillings for printing two-and-twenty pages duodecimo. The paper was from twelve to sixteen shillings a ream. I do not blame you for printing those tracts. But you do not send me your Journal yet. Surely you 1 He severed his connection with William Pine of Bristol, who had been his chief printer, in 1775. 274 TO AMERICAN METHODISTS had time enough to write it over. Dr. Coke seems to think you are irresolute, yet not willing to take advice. I hope better things of you ; and that your heart says to God and man, ' What I know not, teach thou me.'—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. ' Guard your Flock.' Wesley gives wise counsel on the treatment of heresy and its teachers. To William Black. Near BATH, September 26, 1787. have great reason to praise God for the great things that He hath done, and to expect still greater things than these. Your grand difficulty, now, will be to guard your flock against that accomplished seducer. When you mentioned a person came from Scotland, I took it for granted that he was a Calvinist. But I find it is not so well; for I take a Socinian to be far worse than even a Predestinarian. Nevertheless, I advise you and all our preachers, never oppose him openly. Doing thus would only give the unawakened world an advantage against you all. I advise you farther, never speak severely, much less contemptuously, of him in any mixed company. You must use no weapons in opposing him, but only those of truth and love. Your wisdom is— (1) Strongly to inculcate the doctrines which he denied, but without taking any notice of him, or seeming to know that any one does deny them; (2) To advise all our brethren (but not in public) never to hear him, at the peril of their souls ; and (3) Narrowly to inquire whether any one is staggered, and to set such an one right as soon as possible. 275 M Y DEAR BROTHER,—You JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Thus, by the blessing of God, even those that are lame will not be turned out of the way. Peace be with your spirit!—I am, dear Billy, your affectionate friend and brother. * The Case of those poor Demoniacs.' The physical phenomena, faintings, convulsions, fits, etc., which accompanied Wesley's early preaching, and, as here, often appeared in the early stages of revivals, he often ascribed to Satanic agency. The work in America was marked, sometimes hindered, by such occurrences, exceptional even in their own strange kind. 1 To William Black. GLOUCESTER, March 19, 1788. am glad to find you are still going on in the glorious work to which you are called. We have need to make haste therein; to use all diligence. For the work is great; the day is short; and lonely is the night wherein no man can work. I t is well that Satan is constrained to show himself so plainly in the case of those poor demoniacs. Thereby, he weakens his own kingdom, and excites us to assault him more zealously. In the beginning of the work in England and Ireland we had many cases of the kind. But he now chooses to assault us by subtlety more than by strength. I wish you would do all you possibly can to keep our brethren in peace with each other. Your pains will not be lost on poor John M'Geary. There is much good in him. Indeed, he is naturally of a bold, forward temper; but I hope his zeal is now according to knowledge. Praying that you may increase with all the increase of God,—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—I 1 See references under vol. iii. p. 417 et seq. 2 5 310 TO EBENEZER BLACKWELL widow, who was in charge of the Orphan House in Wesley's centre at Newcastle-on-Tyne, married John Bennet, one of his preachers. When Wesley's foot slipped on London Bridge, involving injuries to his ankle, he rested a week in the house of Mrs. Vazeille, who resided in Threadneedle Street, and there rendered him kindly care. On February 18, 1751, eight days after the accident, they were married. 1 This haste was followed by repentance at leisure in the many years of misery involved for Wesley. This began to be acute about five years after their marriage. Mrs. Wesley died in 1781, at the age of seventy-one, ten years before Wesley died. His marriage was the one calamitous blunder of his life. He writes happily and fondly about and to his wife in the letters of this period. Later a terrible change is seen.2 Charles Wesley was greatly disturbed by his brother's marriage. He and his wife had visited at Mrs. Vazeille's. He feared its effects in lessening his brother's work and influence. He knew himself to be incapable of directing or governing the rapidly increasing host of Methodists. Hence the hint in this letter that he would not attend Wesley's annual Conference with his preachers, to be held a week later in Bristol. He was not present. Wesley's fears of it were realised : the grave question of separating Methodism from the Church of England was then first raised. Charles Wesley proved himself completely loyal to his brother in all the troubles with his wife. By sympathy and advice Blackwell shared in them also, as we shall see. 1 On June i, consequent upon his marriage, Wesley resigned his fellowship of Lincoln College, Oxford. Hence the legend so often used under his name, * Sometime Fellow,7 etc. 2 The important letters xxxiv. and xxxv. are now first given completely ; and xxxvi., with Blackwell's excellent reply, is now first published, all from the Colman Collection. The three Wesley letters are from copies made by the late Mr. Thomas Marriott, who contributed many such to Wes. Meth. Mag., 1845, etseq. See next chapter. For other letters and facts, see Wesley's Journal, in loc. ; Coke and Moore's Life of Wesley (1792); Jackson's Charles Wesley, vol. i. pp. 560, 568-571 ; Tyerman's Wesley, vol. ii. pp. 101-115 ; ' Wesley's wife' in Wesley Studies; Cambridge Modem History, vol. vi. p. 852. 311 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Letter XV. BRISTOL, March 5, 1751. DEAR SIR,—After an extremely troublesome day I reached Chippenham last night, twenty miles short of Bristol, and came hither between ten and eleven this morning, at least as well as when I left London. The note delivered to me on Sunday night, which ran in these words: *L~- ' " -/C^ T£-^=—<*-£*- y " ^ / y ts*^^ Zjs*r~d *~f P^ph^ersC-.yot^r* <£fc~ A ( V r X , < s - « ^ A > ~ ^ ^ ^ < a^z^A-/ a v^^^V-*-'/\ ^7~-y> &^r^ y& e^ «/£§,«**, Cr£fJfc eX-^w«"/L&JhJt- «£* «/ tf-***^ 'J C?->~ &-/~i__ 01 /K^M—e^Ot-J a~4^s/* fZfx^cJ (/ frxJt-,. x/GL^ntJ Ot^J^*/—* f9P» • t ?. ^ TO LADY MAXWELL under your own hand. But when I have heard nothing from you for six or eight weeks, I begin to be full of fears. I am afraid either that you are dead or that you are extremely ill; not well able to write, or that your affection is cooled, perhaps to me, perhaps to Him that loves you a thousand times better than I do. It lies upon you to put a period to my fears, to show me that you are still the same, only more and more determined, in spite of all temptations, to go on in the most excellent way. I knew not whether it was proper to make any inquiry concerning the trial out of which you said God had delivered you, because there are some things of so delicate a nature that one scarce knows how to commit them to paper. Otherwise I think there is nothing which you might not mention to me, as I believe none is more nearly concerned for your happiness. Have you found a return of the trial you mentioned ? Still the God whom you serve is able to deliver you. I do not indeed wonder that things should make a deep impression upon so tender a spirit. But still, is not His grace sufficient for you ? and shall not His strength be made perfect in your weakness? Are not you still determined to seek your happiness in Him ? And to '.evote to God all you have, and all you are ? Is it not your desire to be all given up to Him, and to glorify Him with your body and with your spirit? Go on in His name and in the power of His might! Through Him you shall be more than conqueror. Frequently He has chastened and corrected you: but He has not given you over to death, and He never will. ' T h o u shalt not die but live, and declare the loving kindness of the Lord.' I shall hope to receive a particular account of your health and of your present situation in all respects. Need there be any reserve between us ? Cannot you speak to me with all simplicity ? May the Peace and Love of God fill and 2c 401 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS rule your heart.—I am, My dear Lady, Your most affectionate servant. A letter directed to Dublin will always find me. * Providentially called . . . where you now are . . . you will be preserved.' Lady Maxwell was visiting her relatives at the family seat at Brisbane, probably for her health's sake. Wesley is, as always, chiefly solicitous for her spiritual welfare. He invites her to try the Bristol Hot Well for her health. Thirteen years before he drank the waters there for two months, when recovering from consumption. As Lady Maxwell passes through Newcastle, Mrs. Wesley will meet her, and she can stay at the Orphan House there, his northern centre. At Bristol his coach and pair are to be at her disposal. Miss Lewen of Durham had given these to Wesley eighteen months before for his journeys. The Misses Dale were favourites of his. 1 Letter XIII. CORK, June 4, 1767. M Y DEAR LADY,—My belief is that a journey to England might be of great service to your health. And it is not improbable you might receive much benefit from the water of the Hot Well near Bristol. In August I hope to be at Bristol, and again in the latter end of September. My chaise and horse are at Bristol, which you would oblige me much if you would please to use as your own (if you do not bring any with you) during your stay there, for you should, if possible, ride out daily. My wife, who is at Newcastle, will be exceeding glad to wait upon you there. And if you choose to rest a few days, I should be happy if you would make use of the Orphan House. You would be pleased with the Miss Dales and they with you : you and they have drunk 1 402 See above, p. 370. TO LADY MAXWELL into one spirit. Miss Peggy is one of the holiest young women that I have any knowledge of: indeed, I think both the sisters have no desire but to glorify God with their body and with their spirit. You will be so kind as to let me know when you expect to be at Newcastle, and possibly I may meet you there. As you were providentially called to the place where you now are, I cannot doubt but you will be preserved. But you have need of much prayer and continual watching, or you may insensibly lose what God has given. I am jealous over you : I cannot but be interested in whatever concerns you. I know your tender spirit, your desire to please all for their good ; your unwillingness to give pain. And even these amiable dispositions may prove a snare ; for how easily may they be carried too far! If you find anything hurts you, or draws your soul from God, I conjure you, flee for your life! In that case you must not stand upon ceremony; you must escape without delay. But I hope better things : I hope you are sent to Brisbane, not to receive hurt, but to do good ; to grow in grace, to find a deeper communion than ever with Him that gave Himself for you, and to fulfil the joy of, My dear Lady, Your most affectionate friend. ' A Christian after the Common Rate. No !' A strange letter, and a new one, mingled of Christian counsel, close confidences, and a ghost story. ' The strange account of Elizabeth Hobson of Sunderland,' a woman of twenty-four, was a long story of ghostly apparitions and sounds which she stated she had seen and heard from childhood at the times when people died whom she knew. Wesley gives it in full in his Journal under date May 25 of this year. Some one had filched half Wesley's account of it. Lady Maxwell has these, or a copy of the complete account. Elizabeth Hobson had since met ' t h e ghost' again. This, she declared, was that of her grandfather, who 403 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS appointed Boyldon Hill, half a mile from Durham, as meeting-place ! Johnson and Boswell did not accept the story. Wesley did, and many such, as his Journal shows. Dr. Fitchett aptly says that the strange sounds at Epworth Rectory, the home of Wesley's boyhood, made a path in his brain for all such stories, and for the supernatural. In the letter next to the following, Wesley refers to his mother's and his own views as to some apparitions. Letter XIV. REDRUTH, Sept. 9, 1768. is impossible for me to give you pain without feeling it myself. And yet the manner wherein you receive my plain dealing gives me pleasure too. Perhaps you never had so uncomplaisant a correspondent before. Yet I think you hardly ever had one who had a more tender regard for you. But it is this very thing which lays me under a constraint to tell you all I hear or fear concerning you, because I cannot be content that you should be a Christian after the common rate. No. I want you to have all the mind that was in Christ, and in everything to walk as He walked. To live like an angel here below, unblameable in spotless love. What a comfort it is when we can have confidence in each other ! I rejoice that you can speak freely, even upon so delicate a subject. You may be assured that no eye but mine shall see your letter. One cannot be too wary in things of this kind; some men are so weak, and others so wicked. I give entire credit to everything you say, particularly concerning Mr. H., and I join with you in thinking there must be some mistake in the person who informed me of that circumstance. I do not believe [he] uttered such a word. I cannot think him capable of it. I am now entirely easy upon that head, being persuaded that, through the power of Christ strengthening you, you will stand fast both in the 404 M Y DEAR LADY,—It TO LADY MAXWELL inward and outward liberty wherewith He has made you free. l a m glad to hear Lady Baird has the courage to cast in her lot with a poor, despised people. In what instance do you apprehend L. B. to be in danger of enthusiasm ? When I know more particularly, I will take an opportunity of either speaking or writing. I suppose a copy of the strange account of Eliz. Hobson was sent you from Newcastle from my papers. Not long after, the former half of these papers, eight pages out of sixteen, was taken away, none can tell how to this day. What I could remember I wrote down again. But I question whether my memory served me as to every circumstance, and must therefore ask of you a copy of what was lost. If you please, Mr. Thompson can transcribe it for me. The thing is now brought, I hope, to a final issue. She has met him at Boyldon Hill, when he took his leave with, ' I shall see you more, in time or in eternity.'' How much happiness is it for us, that we hope to see each other, both in time and in eternity ? ' Nor shorter space True Love can satisfy.' That you may be daily more athirst both for holiness and glory, is the prayer of, My dear Lady, Your affectionate servant. I am now setting my face toward Bristol. ( An Apprehension of a deceased Friend.' Letter XV. LONDON, March 3, 1769. M Y DEAR LADY,—To be incapable of sympathising with the distressed is not a desirable state; nor would one wish to extirpate either sorrow or any other of our natural passions. And yet it is both possible and highly desirable to attain the same experience with the Marquis de Renty, 405 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS who, on occasion of his lady's illness, told those who inquired how he could bear it, * I cannot say but my nature is deeply affected with the apprehension of so great a loss ; and yet I feel such a full acquiescence in the will of God, that, were it proper, I could dance and sing.' I have heard my mother say, ' I have frequently been as fully assured that my father's spirit was with me as if I had seen him with my eyes.' But she did not explain herself any further. I have myself many times found on a sudden so lively an apprehension of a deceased friend that I have sometimes turned about to look; at the same time I have felt an uncommon affection for them. But I never had anything of this kind with regard to any but those that died in faith. In dreams I have had exceedingly lively conversations with them, and I doubt not but they were then very near. I t gives me pleasure to hear that you did not neglect our own preaching in order to attend any other. The hearing Mr. F. at other times I do not know that any could blame, unless you found it unsettled your mind or weakened your expectation of an entire deliverance from sin. And this, I apprehend, it did not. You never ' take up too much of my time.' To converse with you, even in this imperfect way, is both agreeable and useful to me. I love your spirit, and it does me good. I trust God will give you that hunger and thirst after righteousness till you are satisfied therewith. And who knows how soon ?—I am, My dear Lady, Your ever affectionate servant. ' Concerned that you are unwell.5 Always frail, Lady Maxwell's course is again interrupted by sickness. 406 TO LADY MAXWELL Letter XVI. LONDONDERRY, April 29, 1769. M Y DEAR LADY,—A while ago I was concerned at hearing from Edinburgh that you were unwell, although I could not doubt but it was ordered well by an unerring Providence as a means of keeping you dead to all below, and of quickening your affections to things above. And indeed this is the rule whereby the inhabitants of a better world judge of good and evil. Whatever raises the mind to God is good; and in the same proportion as it does this. Whatever draws the heart from its centre is evil; and more or less so, as it has more or less of this effect. You have accordingly found pain, sickness, bodily weakness, to be real goods, as bringing you nearer and nearer to the fountain of all happiness and holiness. And yet, it is certain, nature shrinks from pain, and that without any blame. Only in the same moment that we say, ' If it is possible, let this cup pass from me,' the heart should add, like our great Pattern, ' Nevertheless, not as I will, but as Thou wilt.' Lady Baird I did not see before I left London, and Lady K. B. I did not understand. She was exceedingly civil, and I think affectionate, but perfectly shut up, so that I knew no more of her state of mind than if I had never seen her. —I am, My dear Lady, Your ever affectionate servant. 'Live To-day.' It is probable that the one in high place here referred to was Lady Glenorchy.1 She had opened St. Mary's Chapel, Edinburgh, for use by Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and Methodists. Wesley found a minister for her as Lady Maxwell and she asked—the Rev. Richard De Courcey—a Calvinist. The common use of the chapel proved unworkable. After six months Lady Glenorchy expelled the 1 See p. 418. 407 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Methodist preachers, as their evangelical Arminianism differed from her Calvinism. The two letters which follow this one give some particulars of this trouble. 1 Even Whitefield's death did not stop controversy. That Wesley passes lightly. 'Live to-day!' which he enjoins as a counsel to her here, was his motto, Vive hodie. His warnings in later letters against De Courcey are very quaint. Letter XVII. LONDON, February 17, 1770. M Y DEAR LADY,—To us it may seem that uninterrupted health would be a greater help to us than pain or sickness. But herein we certainly are mistaken : we are not such good judges in our own cause. You may truly say, ' H e a l t h I shall have, if health be best.' But in this and in all things you may trust Him that loves you. Indeed, nervous disorders are, of all others, as one observes, enemies to the joy of faith. But the essence of it—that confidence in a loving, pardoning God—they can neither destroy nor impair. Nay, as they keep you dead to all below, they may forward you therein ; and they may increase your earnestness after that precious love which turns earth into Paradise. It will be by much pains and patience that you will keep one in high life steadfast in the plain, old way. I should wish you to converse with her as frequently as possible. Then, I trust, God will use you to keep alive the fire which He has kindled. I am in great hopes that the chapel will be of use; but it will not be easy to secure a converted clergyman. A schoolmaster will be more easily found; although many here are frightened at the name of Scotland. A diligent master may manage twenty or perhaps thirty children. If one whom I lately saw is willing to come, I believe he will answer your design. 1 408 Journal, in loc ; Tyerman's Life of Wesley, vol. in. p. 64. TO LADY MAXWELL I have some thoughts of going to America; but the way is not yet plain. I wait till Providence shall speak more clearly, on one side or the other. In April I hope to reach Inverness, and to take Edinburgh on my way back to England. But let us live to-day! What a blessing may you receive now! 1 Now let your heart with love o'erflow And all your life His glory show !' I am, My dear Lady, Your ever affectionate servant. ' I never preach in a Controversial Way.' Letter XVIII. LONDON, January 24, 1771. M Y DEAR LADY,—Although Mr. M'Nab is quite clear as to justification by faith, and is, in general, a sound and good preacher, yet I fear he is not clear of blame in this. He is too warm and impatient of contradiction, otherwise he must be lost to all common sense, to preach against final perseverance in Scotland. From the first hour that I entered the kingdom, it was a sacred rule with me never to preach on any controverted point, at least not in a controversial way. Any one may see that this is only to put a sword into our enemies' hands. I t is the direct way to increase all their prejudices, and to make all our labours fruitless. You will shortly have a trial of another kind. Mr. De Courcey purposes to set out for Edinburgh in a few days. He was from a child a member of our societies in the south of Ireland. There he received remission of sins, and was for some time groaning for full redemption. But when he came to Dublin the Philistines were upon him, and soon prevailed over him. Quickly he was convinced t h a t ' there is no perfection,1 and that ' all things depend on absolute and un409 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS changeable decrees.'' At first he was exceedingly warm upon these heads ; now he is far more calm. His natural temper, I think, is good; he is open, friendly, and generous. He has also a good understanding, and is not unacquainted with learning, though not deeply versed therein. He has no disagreeable person, a pleasing address, and is a lively as well as a sensible preacher. ' Surely such a preacher as this was never in Edinburgh before ! Mr. Whitefield himself was not to compare with him! What an angel of a m a n ! ' Now, when you add to this that he is quite new, and very young, you will judge how he will be admired and caressed. How will a raw, inexperienced youth be able to encounter this ? If there be not the greatest of miracles to preserve him, will it not turn his brain ? And may he not then do far more hurt than either Mr. W. or Mr. T. did ? Will he not prevent your friend from going on to perfection or thinking of any such thing? Nay, may he not shake you also ? He would; but that the God whom you serve is able to deliver you. At present, indeed, he is in an exceedingly loving spirit. But will that continue long ? There will be danger on the one hand if it does; there will be danger on the other if it does not. I t does not appear that any great change has been wrought in our neighbours by Mr. Whitefield's death. He had fixed the prejudice so deep that even he himself was not able to remove i t ; yet our congregations have increased exceedingly, and the work of God increases on every side. I am glad you use more exercise. It is good for both body and soul. As soon as Mr. De Courcey is come, I shall be glad to hear how the prospect opens. You will then need a larger share of the wisdom from above; and I trust you will write with all openness to, My dear Lady, Your ever affectionate servant. 410 TO LADY MAXWELL ' The Preachers . . . felt a Damp upon their Spirits.5 Letter XIX. LONDON, February 26, 1771. MY DEAR LADY,—I cannot but think that the chiei reason of the little good done by our preachers in Edinburgh is the opposition which has been made by the ministers of Edinburgh, as well as by the false brethren from England. These steeled the hearts of the people against all the good impressions which might otherwise have been made ; so that the same preachers, by whom God hath constantly wrought, not only in various parts of England, but likewise in the northern parts of Scotland, were in Edinburgh only not useless. They felt a damp upon their spirits ; they had not their usual liberty of speech; and the word they spoke seemed to rebound upon them, and not to sink into the hearts of the hearers. At my first coming I usually find something of this myself; but the second or third time of preaching, it is gone,; and I feel, greater is He that is with us than all the powers of earth and hell. If any one could show you, by plain Scripture and reason, a more excellent way than that you have received, you certainly would do well to receive i t ; and I trust I should do the same. But I think it will not be easy for any one to show us either that Christ did not die for all or that He is not willing as well as able to cleanse from all sin, even in the present world. If your steady adherence to these great truths be termed bigotry, yet you have no need to be ashamed. You are reproached for Christ's sake, and the spirit of glory and of Christ shall rest upon you. Perhaps your Lord may use you to soften some of the harsh spirits, and to preserve Lady Glenorchy or Mr. De Courcey from being hurt by them. I hope to hear from you (on whom I 411 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS can depend) a frequent account of what is done near you. After you have suffered awhile, may God stablish, strengthen, settle you!—I am, My dear Lady, Your very affectionate servant. ' Easier to lose Love than to find Truth.' Fletcher, 1 whom Wesley here and often justly praises, had defended him and his Conference by his First Check to Antinomianism. I t was directed against the Countess of Huntingdon and other Calvinistic leaders who accused Wesley and the Conference, hastily and unjustly, of favouring Justification by Works. To make the Methodist teaching quite clear, Wesley wrote a Declaration at the Conference of 1770, and he and fifty-three preachers signed it. It stated that their trust and that of all ' real Christian Believers' was ' in the alone merits of Christ for salvation, in Life, Death, or the Day of Judgement."' But what of Lady Maxwell herself and her spiritual progress ? This, as always, is Wesley's chief concern. Letter XX. LONDON, February 8, 1772. commend you for meddling with points of controversy as little as possible. It is abundantly easier to lose our love in that rough field than to find truth. This consideration has made me exceedingly thankful to God for giving me a respite from polemical labours. I am glad He has given to others both the power and the will to answer them that trouble me, so that I may not always be forced to hold my weapons in one hand, while I am building with the other. I rejoice, likewise, not only in the abilities but in the temper of Mr. Fletcher. He writes as he lives. I cannot say that I know such another clergyman in EngM Y DEAR LADY,—I 1 412 See p. 138. TO LADY MAXWELL land or Ireland. He is all fire, but it is the fire of love. His writings, like his constant conversation, breathe nothing else to those who read him with an impartial eye. And although Mr. Shirley scruples not to charge him with using subtil ty and metaphysical distinctions, yet he abundantly clears himself of this charge in the Second Check to Antinomianism. Such the last letters are styled, and with great propriety, for such they have really been. They have given a considerable check to those who were everywhere making void the law through faith, setting ' the righteousness of Christ' in opposition to the law of Christ, and teaching that ' without holiness any man may see the Lord; Notwithstanding both outward and inward trials, I trust you are still on the borders of perfect love. For the Lord is nigh ! ' See t h e Lord thy Keeper stand Omnipotently near ! Lo ! H e holds thee by thy hand, And banishes thy fear !' You have no need of fear. Hope unto the end ! Are not all things possible to him that believeth ? Dare to believe ! Seize a blessing now ! The Lord increase your faith ! In this prayer I know you join with, My dear Lady, Your ever affectionate servant. * I want Heat more than Light.' City Road Chapel, London, was the new building which required Wesley's presence. It was to become a centre of world-wide effort and devout interest. High impulse was received by him from Lady Maxwell's letters. Like St. Paul, he was profuse in thanks. As he had so long desired and prayed, Lady Maxwell now enjoyed the riches of the Christian life. Her diary for 1776 says—' What God has done for my soul mocks all power of expression. . . . He 413 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS shines now with meridian brightness.' The footnote of this letter links with Wesley's humble boast—' Our people die well.' Letter XXL NEWCASTLE, May 3, 1777. M Y DEAR LADY,—The new chapel which we are now building in London requires much of my attendance there, so that I cannot be conveniently absent more than two Sundays together. Accordingly, when I set out I fixed Saturday the 19th inst. for my return, and ordered notice to be given of my design to meet the classes the week following. I cannot therefore have the pleasure of seeing you now, which, if it could be, I should greatly desire. I love your spirit, I love your conversation, I love your correspondence. I have often received both profit and pleasure thereby. I frequently find a want of more light; but I want heat more than light, and you have frequently been an instrument of conveying this to my soul, of animating me to run the glorious race. I trust you find no decay in your own soul, but a still increasing vigour. Some time since you enjoyed a measure of that great salvation, deliverance from inbred sin. Do you hold fast where unto you had attained, and still press forward, to be filled with all the fulness of God ? There is the prize before you ! Look up, believe, and take all you want! Wishing you the whole gospel blessing, I remain, My dear Lady, Your ever affectionate servant. I hear Sister Gow is gone hence. Did she go in triumph, or only in peace ? ' Rags and Ruffles.' Five years later (May 31, 1782) Wesley was Lady Maxwell's guest at Saughton Hall, an old mansion-house three miles from Edinburgh. He preached to the poor folk she gathered. Next day he further helped her good work. He 414 TO LADY MAXWELL still has a sharp eye and a quick pen. He writes—' I spent a little time with forty poor children whom Lady Maxwell keeps at school. They are swiftly brought forward in reading and writing, and learn the principles of religion. But I observed in them all the ambitlosa paupertas—the love of finery among the poor. Be they ever so poor, they must have a scrap of finery. Many of them have not a shoe to their foot; but the girl in rags is not without her ruffles.''* ' A Manifestation few are favoured with.' Wesley is now aged eighty-four; but he is still alert to collect and compare varieties of religious experience. Lady Maxwell's intense devotion to God and her mystical utterances may be compared with those of A Kempis, Madame Guyon, and among early Methodists, Mary Fletcher. These spiritual things are discerned by the spiritual. Lady Maxwell speaks of a certain fast day in 1775 when 6 the heavenly King appeared in His beauty, and my fellowship was with the Father and the Son in a most remarkable manner.' Often the experience was hers to which Wesley here refers. I t continued in later years. Amidst the clash of business, like Brother Lawrence, she practised the Presence of God. She wrote—' I have dwelt in the secret place of the Most High, and abode under the shadow of the Almighty; my fellowship with Deity hath been particularly near, solemn, and sweet, more so than words can express, with increasing power to realise the divine Presence, to be all attention to an in-dwelling, in-speaking God. I have also been enabled to get through much business.'' Letter XXII. DUBLIN, July 3, 1787. correspondence, I hope, will never be broken oft* till one of us be removed into a better world. I t is true I have often wondered that you were not weary of so useless a correspondent, for I am very sensible the writing of letters is my brother's talent rather than mine. M Y DEAR LADY,—Our 1 Journal, in loc. 415 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Yet I really love to write to you, as I love to think of you. And sometimes it may please Him, who sends by whom He will send, to give you some assistance by me. And your letters have frequently been an encouragement and a comfort to me. Let them never, my dear friend, be intermitted during the few days I have to stay here below. After Miss Roe x first, and then Miss Ritchie, 2 had given me so particular an account of that branch of their experience, I examined, one by one, the members of the select society in London on that head. But I found very few, not above nine or ten, who had any conception of it. I think there are three or four in Dublin who likewise speak clearly and scripturally of having had such a manifestation of the several persons in the ever-blessed Trinity. Formerly I thought this was the experience of all those that were perfected in love : but I am now clearly convinced that it is not. Only a few of these are favoured with it. I t was indeed a wonderful instance of divine mercy that at a time when you were so encumbered with the affairs of the world that you should have so much larger a taste of the powers of the world to come. It reminds me of Brother Lawrence's words : ' When I was charged with the affairs of the convent at Burgundy I did not understand them : and yet, I know not how, all was well done !' I doubt not you will find the very same experience in everything which God calls you t o : His word will be more and more eminently fulfilled. ' In all thy ways acknowledge Him, and He will direct thy paths.' I rejoice to be, My dear Lady, Your ever affectionate servant. * The Itinerant Plan. . . . Oh do not hide that you are a Methodist.5 The * itinerant plan,' in which Methodist preachers have their circuits confirmed or changed by a Conference each 1 416 See p. 373. 2 See p. 377. TO LADY MAXWELL year, Wesley thought of vital importance. I t has continued, modified, as he allowed, to meet needs. Lady Maxwell continued ' a thorough-paced Methodist' until her death. Letter XXIII. LONDON, August 3, MY DEAR 1788. LADY,—It is certain many persons both in Scotland and England would be well pleased to have the same preachers always. But we cannot forsake the plan of acting which we have followed from the beginning. For fifty years God has been pleased to bless the itinerant plan : the last year most of all. It must not be altered till I am removed, and I hope will remain till our Lord comes to reign upon earth. I do not know (unless it unfits us for the duties of life) that we can have too great a sensibility of human pain. Methinks I should be afraid of losing any degree of this sensibility. I had a son-in-law (now in Abraham's bosom) who quitted his profession, that of a surgeon, for that very reason, because he said it made him less sensible of human pain. And I have known exceeding few persons who have carried this tenderness of spirit to excess. I recollect but one who was constrained to leave off, in a great measure, visiting the sick, because he could not see any one in pain without fainting away. Mr. Charles Perronet was the first person I was acquainted with who was favoured with the same experience as the Marquis de Renty with regard to the ever-blessed Trinity : so that this is not as I was at first apt to suppose, the common privilege of all that are ' perfect in love.' Pardon me, my dear friend, for my heart is tenderly concerned for you, if I mention one fear I have concerning you— lest on conversing with some you should be in any degree warped from Christian simplicity. Oh do not wish to hide 2D 417 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS t h a t you are a M e t h o d i s t ! Surely i t is best to a p p e a r j u s t w h a t you are. I believe you will receive this as a proof of t h e sincerity with which I a m , M y dear L a d y , Y o u r ever affectionate servant. 6 Throw that Money into the sea.' Our last letter is undoubtedly t o L a d y Maxwell, t h o u g h n o t hitherto so given. T h e * great person ' is the Countess of H u n t i n g d o n , 1 a leader of Calvinism. Wesley here risks his friendship with L a d y Maxwell for what he believes is the cause of t r u t h . H e would deter her from advancing Calvinism by building chapels, etc., for which purpose her friend, Lady Glenorchy, has left funds to her as executrix. Notwithstanding the vigorous pleadings of her aged and beloved guide, L a d y Maxwell discharged her trust. 2 She herself remained faithful to the wider views of Methodism. These are now freely t a u g h t in those sanctuaries. Letter XXIV. LONDON, September 30, 1788. M Y DEAR L A D Y , — F o r many years a great person professed, and I believe had, a great regard for me. I therefore believed it my d u t y to speak with all freedom, which I did in a long letter. B u t she was so displeased t h a t she said t o a friend, ' I hate Mr. Wesley above all t h e creatures upon t h e earth.'' I now believe it my d u t y t o write freely t o you. W i l l it have the same effect ? Certainly I would not run the hazard did I not regard your happiness more t h a n your favour. Therefore I will speak. May God enable you n o t only to pardon it b u t t o profit t h e r e b y ! Indeed, unless you profit by it, I do not expect you to forgive. Be pleased t o observe I do n o t affirm a n y t h i n g : I only 1 2 418 See her Life and Times (1839), vol, ii. p. 235 et seq. Seep. 118. TO LADY MAXWELL beg you calmly to consider, Would it be right for me to propagate a doctrine which I believed to be false, particularly if it were not only false but dangerous to the souls of men, frequently hindering their growth in grace, stopping their pursuit of holiness ? And is it right in you to do this ? You believe the doctrine of predestination is false. Is it then right for you to propagate this doctrine in any kind or degree, particularly as it is not only false but a very dangerous doctrine, as we have seen a thousand times ? Does it not hinder the work of God in the soul? feed all evil, and weaken all good tempers ? turn many quite out of the way of life, and drive them back to perdition ? Is not Calvinism the very antidote of Methodism? the most deadly and successful enemy which it ever had ? ' But my friend desired that I would propagate it, and lodged money with me for this very purpose.' What then ? May I destroy souls because my friend desired it ? Ought you not rather to throw that money into the sea ? Oh let not any money, or any friend, move you to propagate a lie ! to strike at the root of Methodism ! to grieve the holiest of your friends, and to endanger your own soul! Living or dying, I shall always be, My dear Lady, Your most affectionate servant. 419 CHAPTER XI TO YOUNG FRIENDS AND OTHERS—CONCERNING LIFE, LEARNING, LITERARY STYLE, SLEEP, HEALTH, AND RELIGIOUS EARNESTNESS WESLEY eagerly gave guidance to young people; albeit, as previous pages show, he seldom wrote to any one on any subject without offering counsel, ' plain and home,'' upon the reader's own life. Dr. J. H. Rigg noted that Wesley's letters indicate that he ' had in no ordinary measure what Miss Julia Wedgwood thought that he lacked, a great faculty of sympathy with individuals.'' His many letters grappled thousands, one by one, to himself, and communicated widely the message of Methodism. Without them it could not have been established. He often begged people to write to him, so that he might have occasion to write and help them. We have not traced complaint by any one of his many correspondents that he failed to reply or avoidably delayed his reply. His letters, especially those to young people, may be compared with Chesterfield's Letters to His Son, and Swift's Letters, Wesley hated the former; the latter he thought * trash, dear at twopence a volume.' Although he had no children of his own, Wesley loved children and young people.1 The children of Mrs. William Smith of Newcastle-on-Tyne, the daughter of Wesley's wife by her former husband, called Wesley ' grandpa,' and they were his happy companions in his journeys near their parents' 1 At Manchester in 1768 he sharply claimed to instruct children, citing as examples for himself St. Paul and the Apostles, no one of whom, so far as we know, had children of his own.—Journal, vol. v. p. 253. 420 TO YOUNG FRIENDS home.1 Wesley's exclusion of play from the time-table at Kingswood School, since ' h e that plays when he is a boy will play when he is a man,1 is balanced by his own recreations and sight-seeings, and the fact, told by Mrs. Hughes of Bath, that when there he filled his coach with children and gave them half-an-hour's ride each day before he set out on his preaching tour. Southey told James Everett this incident of Wesley's visit to his father's house in Bristol. With his beautiful little sister, her ringlets floating over her shoulders, the boy Southey ran downstairs before Wesley. He overtook them on the landing, lifted the little girl in his arms and kissed her, and, placing her on her feet again, put his hand upon the boy's head and blessed him. At Oldham, in 1782, ' a whole troop of boys and girls would not be content till Wesley shook each by the hand.' He would give each an appropriate word. Such was not always tender. 'God bless you, Mr. Wesley,' said a Derbyshire girl to him on one occasion as he passed by. c Young woman,' said he,' your blessing would be of more value if your face and apron were cleaner.' To the Rev. Samuel Furley. Here Wesley is guide, philosopher, and friend to Samuel Furley, while a student at Cambridge University, and in his later formative years also. He became a clergyman, embraced Calvinistic views, and was drawn thereby away from Wesley and into the circle of the Countess of Huntingdon. 2 After his course at Queen's College, Cambridge (where he received Letters i. to vi.), and some short terms of service, he ministered at Slaithwaite, near Huddersfield (Letters x.-xn.); then for many years (1766-1795) at Roche, Cornwall. On September 14, 1768, Wesley records that he spent a comfortable evening with him there. Furley became a devoted man—c a son of thunder rather than a son of consolation.' His growth under Wesley's hand and his life of service may 1 During one of these Wesley and they were preserved from imminent death, which was threatened by the running away of the horses with Wesley's carriage.—fournal, June 20, 1774. 2 See Life and Titnes^ vol. ii. p. 2. 421 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS be contrasted with that of young John Henderson of Pembroke College, Oxford, in whom Wesley was also interested. Of him he wrote (Journal, March 18, 1789), 6 with as great talents as most men in England he had lived two-and-thirty years and done just nothing.' 1 Some of these letters to Furley are strangely vivid. Those on literary style are still good counsel. Seven of the letters, those numbered n., in., iv., v., vi., x., xn., 2 are little known. They throw further light on Wesley's character, and his service to Furley. ' Make and keep one Resolution.' Furley was now about twenty-two. While at Cambridge he had the friendship of Henry Venn, afterwards the earnest vicar of Huddersfield. Like Venn, he sought Wesley's advice. The latter recalls his University career and the steadying influence of the Holy Club and the Oxford Methodists. If Furley mastered the books presented by Wesley for the scholars at Kingswood and those added for a four years' ' course of academical learning,' 8 he would be as Wesley said,' a better scholar than nine in ten of the graduates at Oxford or Cambridge ' then. Wesley was no easy taskmaster for himself or others. If Furley rose at five o'clock each day, Wesley had been at work an hour already. Letter I. BRISTOL, March 30, 1754. received your letter, and rejoiced to find that you are still determined to save yourself, by the grace of God, from this perverse generation. But this cannot possibly be done at Cambridge (I speak from long experience) DEAR S I E , — I 1 See an illuminating note by the late Rev. H. J. Foster, Wesley Historical Society Proceedings, vol. iii. p. 162. 2 These and No. ix. were copied from the originals by the editor of the United Methodist Free Churches Magazine (Rev. William Reid), and published by him therein in 1866 (p. 249 et seq.). A list of other Wesley letters to Furley is given in Wesley Historical Society Proceedings, vol. vi. p. 99. 8 Works, vol. xiii. pp. 252-255. 422 TO YOUNG FRIENDS unless you can make and keep one resolution,—to have no acquaintance but such as fear God. I know it may be some time before you will find any that truly bear this character. If so, it is best to be alone till you do, and to converse only with your absent friends by letter. But if you are carried away with the stream into frequent conversation with harmless, good-natured, honest triflers, they will soon steal away all your strength, and stifle all the grace of God in your soul. With regard to your studies, I know no better method you could pursue, than to take the printed rules of Kingswood School, and to read all the authors therein mentioned, in the same order as they occur there. The authors set down for those in the school you would probably read in about a twelvemonth; and those afterwards named, in a year or two more: and it will not be lost labour. I suppose you rise not later than five: to allow an hour in the morning and another in the evening for private exercises ; an hour before dinner, and one in the afternoon for walking; and go to bed between nine and ten. I commend you to Him who is able to carry you through all dangers, and am, dear sir, your affectionate brother and servant. < Further than this you are not called at present.' Eager to follow Wesley's rule x and do all the good he can, Furley is solicitous about his tutor. : The booklet Wesley recommends is an abridgment of Chapter i. of 1 The rule runs :— * Do all the good you can, By all the means you can, In all the ways you can, In all the places you can, At all the times you can, To all the people you can, As long as ever you can.' 423 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS William Law's Practical Treatise upon Christian Perfection. Of this summary Wesley printed nineteen editions (17401785). Letter II. LONDON, December 7, 1754. M Y DEAR B R O T H E R , — F o r t h e p r e s e n t i t does n o t a p p e a r t o b e necessary for you t o enter i n t o a n y dispute with your instructor. B u t perhaps he would read a short t r a c t : suppose, The Nature and Design of Christianity. If a t a n y time he should be touched by what h e reads, i t would t h e n be a reasonable t i m e t o speak. I should n o t advise you by any means t o enter upon anyt h i n g like teaching or exhorting a company of people. I f any poor townsman, who is sick, desired your assistance, you need n o t scruple t o visit h i m . B u t further t h a n this, i t seems you a r e n o t called t o go a t present. T h e main point is now, t o improve your time in private ; t o keep close t o G o d in prayer, a n d t o fix your eye on H i m in whatever you do. T h e n t h e unction of t h e H o l y O n e will teach you of all t h i n g s . — I a m , your affectionate brother. 6 1 would engage to take any Person, and teach him in seven Years.' Furley wishes t o become a clergyman ; b u t h e thinks t h a t Wesley embodies a n d exacts too high a standard for those who fill t h a t office. This had j u s t been set forth by him in his published Address to the Clergy.1 Among natural and acquired qualifications h e includes ' good understanding, liveliness a n d readiness of t h o u g h t ' ; 6 knowledge of t h e Scriptures—the literal meaning of every word,'' ' acquaintance with t h e original tongues, profane history, t h e sciences —especially logic, metaphysics, n a t u r a l philosophy, and even 1 424 Works•, vol. x. p. 480-500. TO YOUNG FRIENDS geometry ' ; * knowledge of the Fathers'; ' knowledge of the world'; ' common sense ; the courtesy of a gentleman, and a strong and clear voice.''1 In the Address and here he insists also upon ' the main point." The closing paragraph of Letter vi. gives his summary of ministerial qualifications. Letter i III LONDON^ February 18, 1756. DEAR SAMMY,—You are a very complacent person. I know in my little circle of acquaintance, more than twenty, who have all the natural qualifications mentioned in the Address to the Clergy ; and several others who have all the acquired ones, either by education or by grace. And I would engage to take any person of fourteen years of age, who has good natural abilities, and teach him in seven years everything which is there required to a good degree of perfection.2 Eoc pede Herctdum !3 You may easily see what Latin I write, by one of the Dissertations in Jobumf or even by the short conversation with C[ount] Zinz[endor]f which is printed in the Journal? I do not know that I have any theme or declamation left. But why do you not talk Latin when you are with me ? Do this, and you will see the excellence of Terence's Language ; whereas Tully would make you talk like a mere stiff pedant. 1 Wesley regarded his own preachers at first as supplementary to the clergy as instructors; but he rigorously required them to be constant and close students—' five hours in the twenty-four.' See his * Twelve Rules of a Helper,' Works, vol. viii. p. 309, and A New History of Methodism, vol. i. pp. 295-297. 2 On Wesley's work as Oxford don and lecturer see A New History of Methodism, vol. i. p. 177. 8 From the foot we recognise a Hercules, i.e. we judge of the whole from a specimen. 4 His father's Latin Commentary on Job, published in 1736. 5 For September 3, 1741: Journal, vol. ii. p. 488. A translation of this dialogue with the Moravian leader is given by Moore, Life of Wesley, vol. i. p. 481. 425 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Randal's Geographical Grammar is far t h e best compendium of geography which I have seen. And you need n o t h i n g more on t h a t subject, adding only t h e terrestrial globe. If you are master of Hutcheson's Metaphysics, and Clerc's Ontologia, I advise you t o look no further t h a t w a y ; unless you would a d d Malebranche's Search after Truth, or t h e Bishop of Cork's two books again. T h e main point is, with all and above all, s t u d y t h e Greek and Hebrew Bible, and t h e love of Christ.—I am, yours affectionately. * Never write to that Person at all, nor of her.' Only three days after t h e last letter Wesley m u s t send this u r g e n t message. T h i s and L e t t e r s v. and vi. show Furley's grave peril, and Wesley's fatherly anxiety. T h e young man's acquaintance with a lady, his questions a b o u t many books, r a t h e r t h a n close study of any, and his proposal t o see life in London, draw from Wesley sharp rebukes and commands : ' Keep you close' to work, or ' quit t h e college,' and ' c o m e away t o me.' Wesley was no kill-joy, womanhater, or misanthrope. T o o little has been made of t h e lighter and more attractive aspects of his character. 1 In his own youth he was sought after as an engaging companion, a n d always his radiance, H a m p s o n says his hilarity, delighted people. Miss Sarah Wesley, his niece (see page 357), said t h a t her uncle J o h n always showed peculiar sympathy t o young people in love. B u t he could not forget t h e perils, failures, and struggles of his past years. 2 Echoes of t h e m seem t o accompany his calls and cries to young Furley. 4 Stop t h e leak . . . else what signifies it t o adorn t h e ship ? ' 1 3 4#6 See Book I. chapter i p. 5, and Journal, . See above, p. 7. vol. i pp. 20-27. . TO YOUNG FRIENDS Letter IV. [LONDON], February 21, 1756. is but one possible way to gain the victory. Conquer desire, and you will conquer fear. But as long as you are a slave you must be a coward. Be free therefore or you can't be bold. Never write to that person at all, nor of her ; and continue instant in prayer. Cut off the right hand and cast it from you : otherwise you will be a poor dastardly wretch all your days, and one sin will punish another, till the day of grace is at an end.—I am, your affectionate brother. DEAU SAMMY,—There ' Fight, Sammy, fight.' Letter V. KINGSWOOD, March 14, 1756. DEAR SAMMY,—You are sick of two diseases : that affection for a poor silly worm like yourself which only absence (through the grace of God) will cure, and that evil disease which Marcus Antonius complains of,—the St%a fiufiXiw.1 That you are far gone in the latter plainly appears from your not loving and admiring that masterpiece of reason and religion, the Reflections on the Conduct of Human Life, with Regard to Knowledge and Learning;2 every paragraph of which must stand unshaken (with or without the Bible) till we are no longer mortal. If your French book is The Art of Thinking, the author is a very poor tool. But there is none like Aldrich. I scarce know one Latin writer who says so much in so few words. Certainly I shall not write much on Metaphysics of Natural 1 2 Disputes about books. Reflections upon the Conduct of Human Life with reference to Learning and Knowledge ; extracted by Wesley from a work by John Norris of Bemerton, and published by Wesley in 1741. 427 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Philosophy. My life is too far spent. But if you can tell me of any thing (not stuffd with Mathematics) which is worth abridging, well. Huteheson's compendium is intitled Synopsis Metaphysicce; 'Ontologiam and Pneumatologiam Complectens.' I t is a masterly thing. I believe there is nothing yet extant in Natural Philosophy, like the abridgment of the Philosophical Transactions. But an abridgment of that abridgment would be far better. Fight, Sammy, fight. If you do not conquer soon, probably God may send a French army to help you. 1 —I am, yours affectionately. ' Are you stark, staring mad ?' Letter VI. DUBLIN, Good Friday [April 16], 1756. How ? going up to town ? Are you stark, staring mad ? Will you leap into the fire with your eyes open ? Keep off. What else have you to do ? Fly for your life, for your salvation. If you thus tempt the Spirit of God any more, who knows what may be the consequence ? I should not wonder at all to hear you was confined in St. Luke's Hospital ; and then, farewell study! Farewell all hope, either of intellectual or moral improvement; for after this poor machine has received a shock of that kind, it is never more capable of close thinking. If you have either sense or religion enough to keep you close to the College, it is well. If not, I see but one possible way to save you from destruction, temporal and eternal. Quit the College at once. Think of it no more, and come away to me. You can take a little advice from m e ; from other people none at all. You are on the brink of the p i t ; fly away, or you perish. 1 428 The Seven Years' War with France was beginning. TO YOUNG FRIENDS There is no disagreement at all between the Reflections and the Address to the Clergy. I have followed Mr. Norris's advice these thirty years, and so must every man that is well in his senses. But whether you study more or less, does not signify a pin's point. You are taking all this pains in a sinking ship. Stop the leak, stop the leak, the first thing you do ; else what signifies it to adorn the ship ? As to the qualifications of a Gospel minister, grace is necessary; learning is expedient. Grace and supernatural gifts are ninety-nine parts in a hundred. Acquired learning may then have its place.—I am, dear Sammy, yours affectionately. 'The care of a Parish is, indeed, a weighty Thing.' Furley came through his trials safely. He is now ministering at Kippax, near Leeds. His sister Nancy is with him. His energetic temperament still needs restraint. He must also cultivate willingness to learn the things of God from some who, ignorant and poor in things temporal, may enrich him, since they are heirs of the Kingdom. He would meet some such in Yorkshire. Wesley himself was a mystic, ready to hearken to any who knew the secret. Letter VII. [LONDON], January 25, 1762. DEAR SAMMY,—If you entangled yourself with no kind of promise to the archbishop, I doubt not but your ordination will prove a blessing. The care of a parish is, indeed, a weighty thing, which calls for much and earnest prayer. In managing it, you must needs follow your own conscience, whoever is pleased or displeased. Then, whether your success be less or more, you will, by and by, give up your account with joy. I myself hear frequently unscriptural, as well as irrational, 429 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS expressions from those at whose feet I shall rejoice to be found in the day of the Lord Jesus; but blasphemy I never heard from one of them, either teacher or hearer. What is wide of Scripture or reason I mildly reprove; and they usually receive it in love. Generally they are convinced; when I cannot converse, I can bear with them, and indeed, rejoice at the grace of God which is in them. Sammy, beware of the impetuosity of your temper ! It may easily lead you awry. It may make you evil affected to the excellent ones of the earth. Don't expect propriety of speech from uneducated persons. The longer I live, the larger allowances I make for human infirmities. I exact more from myself, and less from others. Go thou and do likewise ! —I am, with love to Nancy, your ever affectionate friend and brother. 6 Forty or fifty People . . . the happiest and holiest in the Kingdom.' A bright, clever letter in which Wesley raps Furley, and states his points well. He uses the Baconian argument in regard to his favourite doctrine of Christian Perfection. He is not to be drawn into bitter controversy on such a subject. Indeed, as he said about this time, 6 1 have entirely lost my readiness in disputing; and I take this to be a providential discharge from it." He had been compelled to do much in defence of himself and his work. As we have seen, he always felt free to decline it. 1 He did answer Dr. Free, the warmest, most prolific, and most scurrilous of his opponents.'' After a second reply Wesley said, ' I leave him now to laugh, and scold, and witticise, and call names just as he pleases; for I have done.' He invites Furley to the next Methodist Conference in the neighbouring city, where he dealt with doctrine and discipline. 1 480 See p. 36. TO YOUNG FRIENDS Letter VIII. DUBLIN, July 30, 1762. I am unanswered, then I am unanswerable.' Who can deny the consequence ? By such an argument you carry all before you, and gain a complete victory. You put me in mind of the honest man, who cried out, while I was preaching, 6 Quid est tibi nomen ?' x And upon my giving no answer, called out vehemently,' I told you he did not understand Latin.' I do sometimes understand though I do not answer. This is often the case between you and me. You love dispute, and I hate it. You have much time, and I have much work. Non sumus ergo pares? But if you will dispute the point with Nicholas Norton, 3 he is your match. He has both leisure and love for the work. For me, I shall only once more state the case. There are forty or fifty people who declare (and I can take their word, for I know them well) each for himself, ' God has enabled me to rejoice evermore, and to pray and give thanks without ceasing. I feel no pride, no anger, no desire, no unbelief, but pure love alone.' I ask, ' Do you then believe you have no further need of Christ, or His atoning blood ?' Every one answers, ' I never felt my want of Christ so deeply as I do now.' But you think : ' They cannot want the merit of His death, if they are saved from sin/ They think otherwise. They know and feel the contrary, whether they can explain it, or no. There is not one, either in this city, or in this kingdom, who does not agree in this. Here is a plain fact. You may dispute, reason, cavil about it, just as long as you please. Meantime, I know, by DEAR SAMMY,—'If 1 2 3 What is your name? I am not therefore your equal. A heated disputant to whom Wesley wrote a long letter.— Works, vol. xiii. pp. 187-192. 481 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS all manner of proof, that these are the happiest and holiest people in the kingdom. Their light shines before men. They have the mind that was in Christ, and walk as Christ also walked. And shall I cease to rejoice over these holy, happy men, because they mistake in their j udgement ? If they do, I would to God that you and I and all mankind were under the same mistake; provided we had the same faith, the same love, and the same inward and outward holiness! —I am, dear Sammy, yours affectionately. P.S.—Will August ? you not meet us at Leeds on the 10th of ' D o you believe Evil Tempers remain till Death?' Furley thinks he detects contradictions in Wesley's teaching on Christian Perfection. With a broad hint that Furley may be mistaken, Wesley gives him an important explanation. Letter IX. BRISTOL, October 13, 1762. general, when I apprehend < certainly this is a contradiction,' if I find other persons of equal sagacity with myself, of equal natural and acquired abilities, apprehend it is not, I immediately suspect my own judgement; and the more so, because I remember I have been many times full as sure as I am now: and yet afterwards I found myself mistaken. As to this particular question, I believe I am able to answer every objection which can be made. But I am not able to do it without expending much time, which may be better employed. For this reason, I am persuaded, it is so far from being my duty to enter into a formal controversy concerning it, that it would be a wilful sin. I t would be 432 DEAR SAMMY,—In TO YOUNG FRIENDS employing my short residue of life in a less profitable way than it may be employed. The proposition which I still hold is this, ' A person may be cleansed from all sinful tempers, and yet need the atoning blood/ For what? For 'negligences and ignorances': for both words and actions (as well as omissions) which are, in a sense, transgressions of the perfect law. And I believe no one is clear of these, till he lays down this corruptible body. Now, Sammy, dropping the point of contradiction or no contradiction, tell me simply, What would you have more ? Do you believe evil tempers remain till death ? All, or some ? If some only, which ? I love truth wherever I find i t ; so if you can help me to a little more of it, you will oblige, dear Sammy, yours affectionately. 6 I t might have pleased God to make you a wit too.' Now at Slaithwaite, where he laboured successfully for about five years (1762-1766), Furley still seeks Wesley's counsel. In his reply he finds room for a good story. Letter X, [Circa, 1764.] Perronet, 1 the author of that remark on 2 Peter iii. 13, does not believe that Christ will reign at all upon earth, nor in any Millennium, till we come to heaven. The argument by which he endeavours to prove that St. Peter speaks there only to what will precede the Day of Judgement is this: ; If those expressions " a new heaven and a new earth " refer only to this world when they occur in Isaiah, then they refer to nothing more when they are used by St. Peter? I should never have suspected Dr. Sherlock of writing anything in a burlesque way. He never aimed at it in his DEAR SAMMY,—Charles 1 2E See above, p, 330. 433 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS controversy with Dr. South, and seemed exceedingly angry at his opponent for doing so. Probably he knew himself to be over-matched by the Dr., and therefore did not care to engage him on his own ground. * But why should you be angry," says Dr. South, i at wit ? It might have pleased God to make you a wit too.' I think the danger in writing to Bishop Warburton, 1 is rather that of saying too much than too little. The least said is the soonest amended, and leaves an ill-natured critic the least to take hold of. I have therefore endeavoured to say as little upon each head as possible. If he replies, I shall say more. But I rather think he will not, unless it be by a side stroke, when he writes on some other subject. How does the work of God prosper at Huddersfield and Slaithwaite ? Do you begin to see the fruit of your labours ? and does your own soul prosper? What signifies all but this, to save our own souls and them that hear us ?—I am, dear Sammy, your affectionate friend and brother. ' What is it that constitutes a good Style ?' ' Our late conversation,' between Wesley and Furley, probably occurred as Wesley passed through or near Furley's village, Slaithwaite, on his way ' over the mountains' from Huddersfield to Manchester, eight days before this letter. One would give much to have heard them talk—the one charmingly simple and strong, the other self-conscious and stilted, on this subject of literary style. It was a favourite minor topic with Wesley. He is delightfully frank with Furley in these letters. Evidently he was not thanked for his pains. I t is admitted that Wesley here writes of what he knew, and that, as a stylist, he is among the first in his kind. These letters are good counsel, and Wesley's writings are an example, as Edward Fitzgerald said, of 'pure, unaffected, 1 484 See above, p. 36. TO YOUNG FRIENDS undying English.'' As specimens of formal writing he might have commended to Furley his Appeals to Men of Reason and Religion. Of less formal composition these letters and many others here given are excellent examples. A presentday master of style has paid high tribute to Wesley's incomparable Journal.1 Wesley was a consummate master in stating a case. His prefaces are singularly clever. Informing, sharp, droll, satiric, by turns, they make together a complete apologia pro vita sua for an editor. Although Wesley says he never thought of his style when writing, he knew when he wrote effectively, as he tells Furley. He declined to burn some of his old sermons. Though he held that if angels wrote books we should have few, yet he wrote many.2 Wesley offers no apology to Furley or to any one for the plainness of his style. He declared, when eighty-two years of age, that he 'could even then write as floridly and rhetorically as even the admired Dr. Blair; but I dare not. I dare no more write in a fine style than wear a fine coat.' 8 He thought the English of St. John's First Epistle a model of style. Few will challenge this opinion, or the eminence of the stylists whom he commends to Furley, or the counsels he gives to him. The second and little known letter on this subject here given (Letter xu.), adds valuable confirmation and illustration from Wesley's experience. Mr. Telford shows 4 how 1 * There is no book, I humbly think, in all the world like John Wesley's Journal. It is pre-eminently the book of the resurrection life lived in this world. It has very few companions. Indeed, it stands out solitary in all Christian literature—clear, detached, columnar. It is a tree that is ever green before the Lord. It tells us of a heart that kept to the last its innocent pleasures and interests, but held them all loosely and lightly, while its Christian, passionate peace grew and grew to the end. To the last these are, not diminishing, but increasing; the old zeal, the old wistfulness, the calm but fiery and revealing eloquence. John Wesley was, indeed, one of these who had attained the Second Rest—of those who, to use his own fine words, are " at rest before they go home ; possessors of that rest which remaineth even here for the people of God.'" 2 3 4 Sir W I L L I A M ROBERTSON NICOLL, M.A., LL.D. See above, p. 7. Works, vol. vi. p. 187. Wesley Studies, p. 194. 485 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Wesley learned to adapt his style on occasion to meet the humblest. He read one of his sermons to Betty, a maidservant, and asked her to stop him whenever there was a word she did not understand. The < Stop, sir,' came so often that he was annoyed; but he learned a lesson. Letter XL LIVERPOOL, July 16, 1764. 1 DEAR SIR,—I have had many thoughts since we parted, on the subject of our late conversation. I send you them just as they occur. ' W h a t is it that constitutes a good style ?' Perspicuity, purity, propriety, strength, and easiness, joined together. When any one of these is wanting, it is not a good style. Dr. Middleton's style wants easiness; it is stiff to a high degree. And stiffness in writing is full as great a fault as stiffness in behaviour. It is a blemish hardly to be excused, much less to be imitated. He is pedantic. ' It is pedantry,' says the great Lord Boyle, ' to use a hard word, where an easier will serve.' Now, this the Doctor continually does, and that of set purpose. His style is abundantly too artificial: Artis est celare artem;2 but his art glares in every sentence. He continually says, 6 Observe how fine I speak' : whereas, a good speaker seems to forget he speaks at all. His full round curls naturally put one in mind of Sir Cloudesley Shovel's peruke, t h a t i eternal buckle taken in Parian stone. , Yet this very fault may appear a beauty to you, because you are apt to halt on the same foot. There is a stiffness both in your carriage and speech, and something of it in your very familiarity. But for this very reason you should be jealous of yourself, and guard against your natural infirmity. If you imitate any writers let it be 1 If this date is strictly correct this letter was written on a Sunday ; but Wesley sometimes slips as to dates and names. 2 It is the highest art to conceal art. 436 TO YOUNG FRIENDS South, Atterbury, or Swift, in whom all the proprieties of a good writer meet. I was myself once much fonder of Prior x than Pope; as I did not then know that stiffness was a fault. But what in all Prior can equal, for beauty of style, some of the first lines that Pope ever published ?— ( Poets themselves must die, like those they sung, Deaf the praised ear, and mute t h e tuneful t o n g u e ; E'en he whose heart now melts in tender lays, Shall shortly want the generous tear he pays. Then from his eyes thy much-loved form shall p a r t ; And the last pang shall tear thee from his h e a r t ; Life's idle business at one gasp be o'er, The Muse forgot, and thou beloved no more.' Here is style! How clear, how pure, proper, strong, and yet how amazingly easy ! This crowns all; no stiffness, no hard words; no apparent art, no affectation ; all is natural, and therefore consummately beautiful. Go thou and write likewise. As for me, I never think of my style at all; but just set down the words that come first. Only when I transcribe anything for the press, then I think it my duty to see every phrase be clear, pure, and proper. Conciseness (which is now, as it were, natural to me) brings quantum sufficit2 of strength. If, after all, I observe any stiff expression, I throw it out, neck and shoulders. Clearness in particular is necessary for you and me; because we are to instruct people of the lowest understanding. Therefore we, above all, if we think with the wise, yet must speak with the vulgar. We should constantly use the most common, little, easy words (so they are pure and proper) which our language affords. When I had been a member 1 See above, p. 238. See also Wesley's ' Thoughts on the Character and Writings of Mr. Prior.' There he thinks Prior much finer than Pope. — Works, vol. xiii. p. 380. 2 As much as suffices. 487 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS of the University about ten years, I wrote and talked much as you do now. But when I talked to plain people in the castle, or the town, I observed they gaped and stared. This quickly obliged me to alter my style, and adopt the language of those I spoke to. And yet there is a dignity in this simplicity, which is not disagreeable to those of the highest rank. I advise you sacredly to abstain from reading any stiff writer. A bystander sees more than those who play the game. Your style is much hurt already. Indeed, something might be said if you were a learned Infidel, writing for money or reputation. But that is not the case : you are a Christian Minister, speaking and writing to save souls. Have this end always in your eye and you will never designedly use any hard word. Use all the sense, learning, and time you have ; forgetting yourself, and remembering only those are the souls for whom Christ died; heirs of a happy, or miserable eternity!—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. ' I may say, . . . X know a good style from a bad one,' Letter XII. YARMOUTH, October 11, 1764. have delayed writing thus long, because I was not inclined to draw the sword of controversy; particularly on a subject not very important, and with a person not very easy to be convinced. I simply told you my thoughts concerning style, and concerning yourself. If you can profit by them, well; if not, there is no harm done. I wanted to have you write in the most excellent way: if you prefer any other, you may. I have no prejudice for or against any writer; but I may say, without much vanity, I know a good style from a bad one, and it would be a shame 438 DEAR SAMMY,—I TO YOUNG FRIENDS if I did not, after having spent five-and-forty years (with some natural understanding, much attention, and a free acquaintance with many eminent men) in reading the most celebrated writers in the English tongue. Observing you to want one of the things essential to a good style, namely, easiness, I warned you of it, and to make the reason of my caution more clear, enlarged a little upon the head. You reply,' Harmony is essential to a good style.' I t may be so ; I have nothing to say to the contrary. In the very lines I quoted there is admirable harmony: nihil supra:x the soul of music breathes in them; but there is no stiffness. The lines are as easy as harmonious. This is the perfection of writing. Whether long periods or short are to be chosen, is quite another question. Some of those you transcribe from Swift are long; but they are easy too; entirely easy, void of all stiffness, and, therefore, just such as I advise you to copy after. The paragraphs cited from Hawksworth are far inferior to them, not more harmonious, but more stiff and artificial. That from Wharton is worst of all, stiff as a stake, all art and no nature. I know not what taste they can have who admire his style; certainly they must prefer Statius to Virgil. T h a t ' poor people understand long sentences better than short' is an entire mistake. I have carefully tried the experiment for thirty years, and I find the very reverse to be true. Long sentences utterly confound their intellects; they know not where they are. If you would be understood by them, you should seldom use a word of many syllables, or a sentence of many words. Short sentences are likewise infinitely best, for the careless and indolent. They strike them through and through. I have seen instances of it a hundred times. Neither are the dull and stupid enlightened nor the careless affected by long and laboured 1 Nothing could be better. 439 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS periods half so much as by such short ones as these,' The work is great; the day is short; and long is the night wherein no man can work.' But the main thing is, let us be all alive to God. Let Christ reign alone in our hearts. Let all that mind be in us which was in Christ Jesus; and let us walk as Christ also walked. Peace be with you and yours!—I am, your affectionate friend and brother. To the Sons and Daughter of his brother Charles. Interested in all, Wesley was always keenly alive to counsel and help his own relatives. Five letters follow which he sent to Charles, Samuel, and Sarah Wesley, the upgrown children of his brother Charles. They are of much interest. Charles and Samuel were exceptionally gifted as musicians.1 As little children they were regarded by competent authorities as musical prodigies. Their gifts developed with their years. They held many private concerts in their fathers house in Marylebone, London. These were regularly attended by gifted musicians and the nobility. George in. and George iv. delighted in the genius of young Charles Wesley. Dr. Howard said that Samuel's gifts were surely heaven-born. John Wesley attended one of these chamber concerts ; but he declared, ' I love plain music and plain company best.'' Beautiful solicitude prompted him to send this letter to his nephew Charles a few months later. He was now twenty-four years of age. ' There is a Debt of Love which I should have paid before now.' To Charles Wesley', Junior. Near LEEDS, August 4, 1781. has been much upon my mind to-day that I am still indebted to you. There is a debt of love DEAR CHARLES,—It 1 44.0 Jackson's Life of Charles Wesley', voL ii. pp. 297 et seq. TO YOUNG FRIENDS which I should have paid before now. But I must not delay it any longer. I have long observed you with a curious eye; not as a musician, but as an immortal spirit, that is come forth from God, the father of spirits, and is returning to Him in a few moments. But have you well considered this ? Methinks if you had, it would be ever uppermost in your thoughts. For what trifles, in comparison of this, are all the shining baubles of the world ! e Wise is the man that labours to secure The mighty, the important stake ; And by all methods strives to make His passage safe, and his reception sure.' God has favoured you with many advantages. You have health and strength, and a thousand outward blessings. And why should not you have all the inward blessings which God has prepared for those that love Him ? You are goodhumoured, mild and harmless. But unless you are born again you cannot see the kingdom of God. But ask, and you shall receive; for it is nigh at hand!—I am, dear Charles, your affectionate uncle. ' A s your Business . . . calls you into the Fire, I trust you will not be burned.' Wesley's letter drew from young Charles a gratifying reply, which Wesley followed with this second letter. Tyerman notes that Charles was a young man of deep feeling; that in later years he attended the chapels of the Methodists, and held their preachers in high esteem. This is confirmed by his sister's letter, quoted below. To Charles Wesley\ Junior. BRISTOL, September 8, 1781. DEAR CHARLES,—Your letter gave me a good deal of satisfaction. You received my advice just as I hoped you would. 441 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS You are now, as it were, in the crisis of your fate; just launching into life, and ready to fix your choice, whether you will have God or the world for your happiness. Scripture and reason tell you now, what experience will confirm, if it pleases God to prolong your life, that He ' made your heart for Himself; and it cannot rest till it rests in Him.'' You will be in danger of being diverted from this thought by the fashion of the world. The example of those that are round about us is apt to get within our guard. And indeed their spirit steals upon us in an unaccountable manner, and inclines us to think as they think. Yet you cannot avoid being very frequently among elegant men and women, that are without God in the world. And as your business, rather than your choice, calls you into the fire, I trust you will not be burned; seeing that He whom you desire to serve is able to deliver you, even out of the burning, fiery furnace,—I am, dear Charles, your very affectionate uncle. 'If you are not born of God, you are of no Church/ Wesley's nephew Samuel, to the poignant grief of his father Charles Wesley, entered the Church of Rome at the age of twenty. He was drawn in part by the chance to use his musical talents. 1 For one of his compositions, a high mass for use in the chapel of Pius vi., he received the thanks of that Pope. Apart from this step in life, young Wesley was less seriously inclined than were his brother and sister. Hence this letter sent to him, now twenty-two, by his uncle, John Wesley. Its tolerance and insistence on essentials are noteworthy. Young Wesley did not long remain in that Church. A sad season of belief in fatalism was followed by penitence in old age. 1 When the Duchess of Norfolk suggested to the father motives which might have actuated his son, the poet replied in great agitation, * Say, " t h e loaves and fishes," madam ! say, " the loaves and fishes."' 442 TO YOUNG FRIENDS To Samuel Wesleyr, Junior, [LLYNGWAIR, PEMBROKESHIRE], August 19, 1784. DEAR SAMMY,—-As I have had a regard for you ever since you were a little one, I have often thought of writing to you freely. And I am persuaded what is spoken in love will be taken in love; and if so, if it does you no good, it will do you no harm. Many years ago I observed, that as it had pleased God to give you a remarkable talent for music, so He had given you a quick apprehension of other things, a capacity for making some progress in learning, and what is of far greater value, a desire to be a Christian. But meantime I have often been pained for you, fearing you did not set out the right way. I do not mean with regard to this or that set of opinions, Protestant or Romish. All these I trample under foot. But with regard to those weightier matters, wherein if they go wrong, either Protestants or Papists, will perish everlastingly. I feared you were not horn again; and ' except a man be born again,' if we may credit the Son of God, c he cannot see the kingdom of heaven'; except he experience that inward change of the earthly, sensual mind, for the mind which was in Christ Jesus. You might have thoroughly understood the scriptural doctrine of the new birth, yea, and experienced it long before now, had you used the many opportunites of improvement which God put into your hand, while you believed both your father and me to be teachers sent from God. But, alas ! what are you now ? Whether of this Church or that, I care n o t ; you may be saved in either, or damned in either; but I fear you are not born again ; and except ye be born again you cannot see the kingdom of God. You believe the Church of Rome is right. What then ? If you are not born of God, you are of no Church. 443 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Whether Bellarmine or Luther be right, you are certainly wrong, if you are not born of the Spirit; if you are not renewed in the spirit of your mind in the likeness of Him that created you. I doubt you were never convinced of the necessity of this great change. And there is now greater danger than ever that you never will be; that you will be diverted from the thought of it by a train of new notions, new practices, new modes of worship ; all which put together (not to consider whether they are unscriptural, superstitious, and idolatrous, or no), all I say put together, do not amount to one grain of true, vital, spiritual religion. O Sammy, you are out of your way ! You are out of God's way ! You have not given Him your heart. You have not found, nay, it is well if you have so much as sought, happiness in God ! And poor zealots, while you are in this state of mind, would puzzle you about this or the other church ! O fools, and blind ! Such guides as these lead men by shoals to the bottomless pit. My dear Sammy, your first point is to repent and believe the Gospel. Know yourself a poor guilty, helpless sinner ! Then know Jesus Christ and Him crucified! Let the Spirit of God bear witness with your spirit, that you are a child of God, and let the love of God be shed abroad in your heart by the Holy Ghost, which is given unto you ; and then, if you have no better work, I will talk with you of transubstantiation or purgatory. Meantime, I commend you to Him who is able to guide you into all t r u t h ; and am, dear Sammy, your affectionate uncle. ' The grand Hindrance . . . what very few People are aware of—Intemperance in Sleep.' Miss Sarah Wesley, now twenty-one years of age, wrote to her honoured and venerable uncle for his advice on life 444 TO YOUNG FRIENDS and education. W i t h his usual practicality, Wesley links t h e physical and t h e spiritual in this reply. H e gives counsel as t o t h e a m o u n t of sleep she should allow herself. One of his own early easily besetting sins was immoderate sleep. 1 H e struggled until he g o t free from it, a n d formed t h e h a b i t of t a k i n g six hours each n i g h t , a b o u t t h e a m o u n t he names here as sufficient for a man. H e t h o u g h t this m a t t e r so i m p o r t a n t t h a t he dealt with i t in a sermon, which he also published, entitled ' Redeeming t h e T i m e . ' 2 H e promises here more advice t o his niece, ' if you can t a k e this." W i t h o u t a thrifty religious use of time, Wesley had small hope of any one. On his death-bed he asked Miss Wesley earnestly, ' D o you continue t o rise early ?' Miss Wesley knew well his interest in her, and his faithfulness in fulfilling a promise t o her, even a t some risk t o himself and his work. I n later years she was wont t o tell a characteristic story illustrative of this, and of her uncle's character and conduct in a crisis. 3 In 1775, when she was a b o u t fifteen, Wesley had promised to t a k e her with him on his preaching tour t o Canterbury and Dover. Mrs. Wesley was again behaving in her strange, unworthy way. She had searched his bureau, mutilated his letters, interpolated words, and cruelly and wickedly misinterpreted spiritual expressions. 4 These she read t o his enemies. T h e letters were t o be sent t o t h e Morning Post. Charles Wesley begged his brother t o stay in L o n d o n and refute t h e slanders on his reputation. ' Brother,' said Wesley t o him, c when I devoted to God my ease, my time, my life, did I except my reputation ? No. Tell Sally I will t a k e her t o Canterbury to-morrow.' To Miss Sarah Wesley. Near LEEDS, July 17, 1781. M Y DEAR SALLY,—-Without an endeavour t o please God and t o give u p our own will, we never shall a t t a i n 1 2 3 4 His See above, p. 7. Works, vol. vii. p. 67. Jackson's Life of Charles Wesley, vol. ii. p. 283. See above, p. 357. 445 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS favour. But till we have attained it, till we have the spirit of adoption, we cannot actually give up our own wills to Him. Shall I tell you freely what I judge to be the grand hindrance to your attaining it ? Yea, to your attaining more health both of body and mind than you have ever had, or, at least, for a long season ? I believe it is, what very few people are aware of, intemperance in sleep. All are intemperate in sleep, who sleep more than what nature requires ; and how much it does require is easily known. There is, indeed, no universal rule—none that will suit all constitutions. But, after all the observations and experience I have been able to make for upwards of fifty years, I am fully persuaded that men in general, need between six and seven hours sleep in twenty-four ; and women, in general, a little more,—namely, between seven and eight. But what ill consequences there are in lying longer in bed, —suppose nine hours in four-and-twenty ? 1. It hurts the body. Whether you sleep or no (and, indeed, it commonly prevents sound sleep) it, as it were, soddens and parboils the flesh, and sows the seeds of numerous disorders ; of all nervous diseases in particular, as weakness, faintness, lowness of spirits, nervous headaches, and consequent weakness of sight. £. It hurts the mind; it weakens the understanding; it blunts the imagination ; it weakens the memory; it dulls all the nobler affections. I t takes off the edge of the soul9 impairs its vigour and firmness, and infuses a wrong softness, quite inconsistent with the character of a noble soldier of Jesus Christ. It grieves the Holy Spirit of God, and prevents, or at least lessens those blessed influences which tend to make you, not almost, but altogether a Christian. I advise you therefore, from this day forward, not trusting in yourself, but in Him that raiseth the dead, to take exactly 446 TO YOUNG FRIENDS so much sleep as nature requires. If you need between seven and eight hours, then, in the name of God, begin this very night, in spite of all temptation to the contrary. Lie down at ten o'clock, and rise between five and six, whether you sleep or no. If your head aches in the day, bear it. In a week you will sleep sound. If you can take this advice, you may receive more from, my dear Sally, yours most affectionately. ' Desire for Knowledge. . . . What Course you may take, I will point out.' Miss Wesley must have complied with the conditions laid down by Wesley in the last letter as to sleep, etc., for three weeks later he sent her this. It contains an outline of a fine course of study. I t should be compared with that proposed for Furley at Cambridge University, given on page 422. With the shining example of his mother before him, Wesley was quite modern in his views of the capacities and abilities of women students. He often wrote to his niece later. She was at his bedside when he died. In the Everett Collection there is an interesting letter written by Miss Wesley on the back of one written by her mother, Mrs. Charles Wesley, the poet's aged widow, dated September 26, 1815. Miss Wesley's letter shows that she profited by her uncle's advice as to education, and more important matters also. She declares, ' I feel attached to the whole body of Methodists as the children of my ancestors, and rejoice to have intercourse with any of the preachers when they will oblige us with their visits. So does my mother and Charles.' To Miss Sarah Wesley. BRISTOL, September 4, 1781. M Y DEAR SALLY,—It is certain the Author of our nature designed that we should not destroy, but regulate, our JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS desire for knowledge. What course you may take in order to do this I will now briefly point out. 1. You want to know God, in order to enjoy Him in time and eternity. % All you want to know of Him is contained in one book, the Bible. And all that you learn is to be referred to this, either directly or remotely. 3. Would it not be well, then, to spend at least an hour a day in reading and meditating on the Bible ? reading, every morning and evening, a portion of the Old and New Testament, with the Explanatory Notes ? 4. Might you not read two or three hours in the morning, and one or two in the afternoon ? When you are tired of severer studies, you may relax your mind by history or poetry. 5. The first thing you should understand a little of is grammar. You may read first the Kingswood English Grammar, and then Bishop Lowth's ' Introduction.' 6. You should acquire, if you have not already, some knowledge of arithmetic. Dil worth's Arithmetic would suffice. 7. For geography, I think you need only read over Randal's or Guthrie's Geographical Grammar. 8. Watts's Logic is not a very good one ; but I believe you cannot find a better. 9. In natural philosophy, you have all that you need to know in Survey of the Wisdom of God in Creation.1 But you may add the Glasgow abridgment of Mr. Hutcheson's works. 10. With any or all of the foregoing studies you may intermix that of history. You may begin with Rollin' 1 In five volumes (3rd ed., 1777), taken by Wesley from the Latin work of Buddgeus, Professor of Philosophy at Jena; but Wesley retrenched, enlarged, or altered every chapter. This is a quite remarkable work, in which the evolutionary theory was anticipated. 448 TO YOUNG FRIENDS Ancient History; and afterwards read, in order, the concise History of the Churchy Burnet's History of the Reformation, the concise History of England, Clarendon's History of the Rebellion, NeaPs History of the Puritans, his History of New England, and Robertson's History of America. 11. In metaphysics, you may read Locke's Essay on the Human Understanding, and Malebranche's Search after Truth. 12. For poetry, you may read Spenser's Faerie Queen, and select parts of Shakespeare, Fairfax, or Hoole ; Godfrey of Bouillon, Paradise Lost, the Night Thoughts, and Young's moral and sacred poems. 13. You may begin and end with divinity; in which I will only add, to the books mentioned before, Bishop Pearson on the Creed, and the Christian Library.1 By this course of study, you may gain all the knowledge which any reasonable Christian needs. But remember, before all, in all, and above all, your great point is, to know the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom He hath sent.—I am, my dear Sally, your affectionate uncle. To a young Disciple. Between the years 1769 and 1773 Wesley wrote nineteen letters to a young lady, a follower of Christ and a Methodist, whose name has not been traced. Here are three from the series. Wesley sought to direct her religious life, her reading, and her training of the young. * The Bible gives us no Authority to think ill of any one.' Letter I. GALWAY, May 28, 1771. M Y DEAR MAID,—Your concern is with the present moment; your business is to live to-day. In every sense, 1 2F See above, p. 303. 449 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS let the morrow take thought for the things of itself. I t is true, the full assurance of hope excludes all doubts of our final salvation; but it does not, and cannot, continue any longer than we walk closely with God. And it does not include any assurance of our future behaviour; neither do I know any word in the Bible which gives us any authority to look for a testimony of this kind. But just so far you may certainly go, with regard to the present moment,— ( I want t h e witness, Lord, T h a t all I do is right, According to Thy will and word, Well-pleasing in Thy s i g h t / Seriously and steadily aim at this, and you will not be disappointed of your hope. With regard to the impression you speak of, I am in doubt whether it be not a temptation from the enemy. I t may occasion many wrong tempers ; it may feed both pride and uncharitableness. And the Bible gives us no authority to think ill of any one, but from plain, undeniable, overt acts. Rollin was a pious man, and a fine historian. If you read one volume, you would feel whether it enlivened or deadened your soul. The same trial you may make as to serious poetry. Very probably this would enliven your soul; and certainly the volumes of Philosophy may, as Galen entitles his description of the human body ' A Hymn to the Creator.' Temporal business need not interrupt your communion with God, though it varies the manner of it. I t is certain every promise has a condition; yet that does not make the promise of none effect; but by the promise you are encouraged and enabled to fulfil the condition. You might like it better were there no condition ; but that would not answer the design of Him that makes it. I t is certain, there are times of nearer access to God, and that it nearly imports us to improve these precious seasons. 450 TO YOUNG FRIENDS But we may find plausible objections against this; and indeed, against anything. The more free you are with me the more you oblige, my dear maid, yours affectionately. 'There maybe Self-Approbation which is not Sin.' Letter II. DUBLIN, July 13,, 1771. M Y DEAR MAID,—Truth and falsehood, and so right and wrong tempers, are often divided by an almost imperceptible line. I t is the more difficult to distinguish right and wrong tempers, or passions, because, in several instances, the same motion of the blood and animal spirits will attend both one and the other. Therefore, in many cases, we cannot distinguish them but by the unction of the Holy One. In the case you mention, all self-complacency or selfapprobation is not pride. Certainly there may be selfapprobation which is not sin, though it must occasion a degree of pleasure. ' T h i s is our rejoicing, even the testimony of our conscience toward God.' And this joy is neither better nor worse for being accompanied by a natural motion of the blood and spirits. Equally natural^ and equally innocent, is the joy which we receive from being approved by those we love. But, in all these instances, there is need of the utmost care lest we slide from innocent joy, or self-approbation, into that which is not innocent, into pride (thinking of ourselves more highly than we ought to think), or vanity, a desire of praise— e For thin partitions do their bounds divide.' Be all in earnest, and always speak without reserve to yours affectionately. 451 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS ' When we have to do with Children.' This ' young disciple' sought Wesley's help in the training of children in religious matters. As already shown, he was deeply interested in children. He believed in their simple piety, and welcomed ' the first faint green blush of springing fruitfulness.' To Elizabeth Bushell, of Wilton, near Salisbury, a girl of nine years, who was refused the Lord's Supper at the parish church because she was so young, Wesley gave that sacrament after instructing her. Her subsequent life showed the sincerity of her early desires. The Saturday night at Kingswood School here referred to would be long remembered. He thought the Church ' catechism utterly improper for children of six or seven years old.' Hence his Instructions for Children here commended, prepared for ' all parents and schoolmasters.' This booklet was mainly a translation of that by Abbe Fleury and M. Poiret. Letter HI. BRISTOL, September 8, 1773. have the clearest proof when we have to do with children, that ' the help which is done upon earth, God doeth it Himself.' All our wisdom will not even make them understand, much less feel, the things of God. The Instructions for Children contain the best matter that we can possibly teach them. But nothing less than the finger of God can write it on their hearts. On Saturday night He sent another shower of grace upon our children at Kingswood. Sixteen of them were deeply affected ; and, I think, thirteen found peace with God. Four or five of them were some of the smallest we had, not above seven or eight years old. Although there may be some use in teaching very young children to ' say their prayers daily'; yet I judge it to be utterly impossible to teach any to 'practise prayers' till they are awakened. For, what is prayer but the desire of 452 M Y DEAR MAID,—We TO YOUNG FRIENDS the soul expressed to God, either inwardly or outwardly ? How then will you teach them to express a desire who feel no desire at all ? When, therefore, Madame Guyon talks in that manner, it often makes me afraid, that both she and her teacher Archbishop Fenelon, talked by rote of the things they knew not. Both of them had an amazing genius, but I doubt full little experience. It is exceeding certain neither his nor her writings are likely to do us any solid service. We have all the gold that is in them, without the dross ; which is often not only useless, but dangerous. Let you and I keep the good old way:— e In doing and bearing, the will of our Lord, We still are preparing, to meet our reward/ Go on steadily in this path: there is none better. By patient continuance in well-doing, seek for glory and honour, and immortality. You shall reap if you faint not.—My dear maid, yours affectionately. Counsel to an ailing Preacher. Guidance in matters of health and sickness was often asked of Wesley and freely given. He and his preachers gave away many thousands of copies of his quaint book, Primitive Physic. His success in dealing with his own frail dyspeptic, consumptive body 1 gave him authority as counsellor. This letter, from the original in the John Rylands Library, Manchester, and little known, is here given as a specimen of many such counsels. John Bredin, now at Whitehaven, was one of Wesley's preachers. He began the work in 1769, and, despite this illness and a later one, continued it for more than fortythree years. Wesley wrote of him to Mr. Adam Clarke as ' a weak brother,'* in the work, who had behaved ill both at Jersey and Guernsey. When Wesley visited his work earlier, in 1787, at Kenagh, Ireland, he found it greatly 1 See Book I. Chapter i. 453 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS revived, although Bredin was then just tottering over the grave.1 Wesley once asked in his Conference, ' Why do so many of our preachers fall into nervous disorders ? * He answered * with his characteristic directness, ' Because they do not avoid indolence and intemperance. Sometimes they sit the whole day. They take more food than nature requires. His advice to the nervous was : — 1 . Touch no dram, tea, 1 tobacco, or snuff. 2. Eat very light, if any, supper. 3. Breakfast on nettle- or orange-peel tea. 4. Lie down before t e n ; rise before six. 5. Every day use as much exercise as you can bear; or,—6. Murder yourself by inches.'' ' Change of Air.5 To John Bredin. Near LONDON, November 30, 1782. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—Medicines, I think, will be of no use to you: unless it were a course of tar-water. But very probably change of air might be of service. I t might be of service to spend, suppose, a week or two at Liverpool. Afterwards, a week or two at Chester or Park-gate, and perhaps at Manchester. Your diet in the meantime should be chiefly milk and vegetables, of which I judge turnips, potatoes, and apples to be the best. Preach as much as you can preach, and no more.—I am, your affectionate brother. * When I was young I had Abundance of Infirmities.' To a clerical friend of long standing, Wesley repeats some of the above advice and gives some secrets of his longevity. Here he states the facts, referred to on page 8, concerning his many ailments as a youth. These are seldom remembered. 1 His famous letter to a friend concerning tea (1748) is a booklet of 4500 words. He was very fond of tea ; drank it when it was 18s. per lb. (1727); gave up drinking it for twelve years; recommenced its use under medical advice * at the close of a consumption.5 454. TO YOUNG FRIENDS To the Rev. Walter Sellon. LONDON, January 10, 1784. the 28th of June I finished my eightieth year. When I was young I had weak eyes, trembling hands, and abundance of infirmities. But by the blessing of God I have outlived them all. I have no infirmities now but what I judge to be inseparable from flesh and blood. This hath God wrought. I am afraid you want the grand medicine which I use—exercise and change of air.—I am, your affectionate brother. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—On ' Not delivered till I was gone, lest you should think I wanted anything.' This characteristic letter is representative of hundreds of similar earnest pleadings with individuals on matters of spiritual concern. Wesley has evidently stayed with this Irish gentleman, or has met him, and has closely observed his personal and family life. Here he sets himself, as Richard Baxter did in many like cases, to remove by letter every obstacle and excuse which his reader may raise against real religion in heart and life. Did Knox reply to Wesley, as he asks ? He hardly knows how Knox will take this appeal. He learned later, and endorsed the original of this letter (now in the Colman Collection) at foot, under Knox's name, with the sad summary, ' He came to nothing.' In his Journal (May 11, 1765) he noted Knox's defection and the coming to him of Alexander Knox of Londonderry. To James Knox^ Sligo. May 30, 1757.x Probably this is the last trouble of the kind which you will receive from me. If you receive it in the same spirit 1 Should probably be 1758. Wesley was not in Ireland in 1757. He was in 1756, and again in 1758 ; and on May 27 and 28 of that year was at Sligo. A month later that year he was at Limerick with Mr. Beauchamp, at whose house he hoped to receive an answer to this letter. The Works version of it, slightly incomplete, is dated May 30, 1765. 455 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS wherein it is written I shall be glad. If not, my word is with the Most High. I did not choose it should be delivered till I was gone, lest you should think I wanted anything from you. By the blessing of God, I want nothing; only that you should be happy in time and in eternity. Still, I cannot but remember the clear Light you had, with regard to the nature of that scriptural charity. You saw what Heart Religion meant, and the gate of it, Justification. You had earnest desires to be a partaker of the whole gospel blessing. And you evidenced the sincerity of those desires by the steps you took in your family. So that in everything you was hastening to be not almost, but altogether a Christian. Where is that Light now ? Do you now see that true religion is not a negative or an external thing, but the life of God in the soul of man, the image of God stamped upon the heart? Do you now see that in order to this we are justified freely, through the redemption that is in Jesus Christ ? Where are the desires after this which you once felt, the hunger and thirst after righteousness ? And where are the outward marks of a soul groaning after God, and refusing to be comforted with anything less than His love ? Will you say, ' But if I had gone on in that way, I should have lost my friends and my reputation ?' This is partly true. You would have lost most of those friends who neither love nor fear God. Happy loss! These are the men who do you more hurt than all the world besides. These are the men whom, if ever you would be a real Christian, you must avoid as you would avoid hell fire. ' But then they will censure me.' So they will. They will say you are a fool, a madman, and what not. But what are you the worse for this ? Why, the spirit of glory and of Christ shall rest upon you. ' But it will hurt me in my business." Suppose it should, 456 TO YOUNG FRIENDS the favour of God would be large amends. But very probably it would n o t ; for the winds and seas are in God's hands, as well as the hearts of men. ' But it is inconsistent with my duty to the Church? Can a man of understanding talk so ? And talk so in earnest ? Is it not rather a copy of his countenance ? Indeed if you mean,' inconsistent with my pleasing this or that clergyman,' I allow it. But let him be pleased or displeased, please thou God ! But are these clergymen the Church ? Unless they are holy men, earnestly loving and serving God, they are not even members of the Church ; they are no part of it. And unless they preach the doctrines of the Church, contained in her articles and liturgy, they are no true ministers of the Church, but are eating her bread and tearing out her bowels. ' But you will not leave the Church.' You never will by my advice ; I advise just the contrary. I advise you to lose no opportunity of attending the service of the Church, of receiving the Lord's Supper and of shewing your regard to all her appointments. I advise you steadily to adhere to her doctrine, in every branch of it, particularly with respect to the two fundamental points, Justification by Faith and Holiness. But, above all, I cannot but earnestly intreat you, not to rest till you experience what she teaches; till (to sum up all in one word),' God cleanses the thoughts of your heart by the inspiration of His Holy Spirit, that you may perfectly love Him and worthily magnify His holy name.' Unless this be done, what will it profit you to increase your fortune, to preserve the fairest reputation, and to gain the favour of the most learned, the most ingenious, the most honourable clergymen in the kingdom ? What shall it profit a man to gain all these, and to lose his own soul ? I know, to God all things are possible. Therefore it is 457 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS possible you may take this kindly. If so, I shall hope to receive a line from you directed to Mr. Beauchamp's in Limerick. If not, let it be forgotten till we meet at the judgement seat of Christ.—I am, dear sir, your affectionate servant. ' I would fain give you one more Instance of my sincere Regard.' A similar letter of thirty years later must be given. The holy ardour of youth and prime still burns in Wesley. He was now eighty-four, and truly a pastor of the pastors. He might have said with St. Paul, ' we were gentle among you, even as a nurse.'' This letter, about which various mistakes l have arisen, is in the Colman Collection. A facsimile is here given. The Rev. Dr. Leslie was rector of Tanderagee, near Belfast. He was Wesley's host on several occasions, and was particularly kind during his alarming illnesses there and in the neighbourhood in June, 1775. Of another visit in June, 1778, and of the delights of Dr. Leslie's domain, Wesley writes glowingly in his Journal: ' A pleasanter spot I never saw. . . . I know not that I have spent a more agreeable evening since I came into the kingdom. . . . I spent another hour with the amiable family this morning, and it was an hour I shall not soon forget.' He has just stayed here again for two days (June 13 and 14). Keenly observant as ever, he contrasts his impressions with those received during that visit of nine, he says * ten,' years before. His Journal shows him more delighted than ever with Dr. Leslie's estate, ' the loveliest scene that can be conceived,' but he has fears concerning more important things. Who would not covet his zeal and his skill in rebuke and exhortation ? Dr. C. H. Crookshank 2 concludes that this letter was received in the spirit in which it was written, for Wesley was welcomed again by Dr. Leslie at this beautiful Irish home. 1 2 458 Cf. Works, vol. xii. p. 350. Wesley Historical Society Proceedings, vol. ii. p. 142. TO YOUNG FRIENDS To the Rev. Dr. Leslie. CHARLEMOUNT [CHARLEMONT, IRELAND], June 16, 1787. REV. AND BEAR SIR,—I have obligations to you on many accounts, from the first time I saw you, particularly for the kind concern you showed when I was ill at Tanderagee. These have increased upon me every time that I have since had the pleasure of waiting upon you. Permit me, Sir, to speak without reserve. Esteem was added to my affectionate regard when I saw the uncommon care and pains you took with the flock committed to your care; as also when I observed the remarkably serious manner whenever you read prayers in your family. Many years have passed since that time, many more than I am now likely to see under the sun. But before I go hence, I would fain give you one more instance of my sincere regard ; the rather, because I can scarce expect to see you again till we meet in a better world. But it is difficult for me to do it, as I feel myself inferior to you in so many respects. Yet permit me to ask you a strange question: Is your soul as much alive to God as it was once ? Have you not suffered loss from your relations or acquaintance, that are sensible and agreeable men, but not encumbered with religion ? Some of them, perhaps, as free from the very form as from the power of i t ! O, Sir, if you lose any of the things which you have wrought, who can make you amends for that loss ? If you do not receive a full reward, what equivalent can you gain ? I was pained even at your hospitable table, in the midst of those I loved so well. We did not begin and close the meal in the same manner as you did ten years ago. You was then, contrary to almost universal custom, unfashionably serious in asking a blessing and returning thanks. I know many would blame you for it. But, surely, your Lord said, 459 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS ' Servant of God, well done."—Wishing you and your lovely family every blessing, I am, dear and Rev. Sir, your obliged and affectionate brother and servant. 6 Your kind Reproof. . . . I cannot write without Tears.' By example, as by precept, Wesley showed nobly how a rebuke should be received. In the Arminian Magazine for 1782 he again expressed ubter detestation of Jacob Behmen (Boehme) the Mystic and his teachings. Wesley asked, 6 with the utmost certainty," is he not ' illuminated from beneath, rather than from above'; and ' ought he not to be styled Demonosopher, rather than Theosopher ?' An old friend, though a much younger man than Wesley, Henry Brooke, a Dublin Methodist, remonstrated with him, and drew this beautiful letter. Brooke was the nephew of a gentleman of the same name whose fine novel, The Fool of Quality', Wesley abridged. To Henry Brooke. [DUBLIN], April 21, 1783. DEAR HARRY,—Your letter gave me pleasure and pain. I t gave me pleasure because it was written in a mild and loving spirit; but it gave me pain because I found I had pained you, whom I so tenderly love and esteem. But I shall do it no more. I sincerely thank you for your kind reproof. It is a precious balm, and will, I trust, in the hands of the Great Physician, be the means of healing my sickness. I am so sensible of your real friendship herein, that I cannot write without tears. The words you mention were too strong. They will no more fall from my mouth. —I am, dear Harry, affectionately yours. 460 CHAPTER X I I ON PUBLIC MATTERS AND TO PUBLIC MEN WESLEY'S well-known counsel to his preachers, ' You have nothing to do but to save souls,' was meant by him and accepted by them in no narrow sense. They were expected to circulate his books—that entitled Primitive Physic as well as the Christian's Pattern; to take good care of their horses and houses; observe and enforce rules of health and sanitation; read to Methodist voters, and freely distribute, Wesley's instructions * at a General Election, and even advise electors for the parliamentary candidate which Wesley favoured: all this, while chiefly promoting the spiritual interests of men, women, and children. In these varied activities Wesley set them an example, as his letters show. He was interested in everything, and nothing human was foreign to him. Here we have the address he prepared for presentation to the King; his letters to Premiers and ministers of the Crown on war, taxation, and Sunday drilling ; to chief magistrates and city corporations about soldiers, or concerning a new theatre. He threatens to write frankly about Voltaire, and sends to hearten Wilberforce. I t is probable that in city and national archives there are other letters of his on public questions and to public men, of which those here given are representative. That to the Premier, given on page 472, was long unknown. The noble breeding, gifts, and training of Wesley come out well in these letters. As in his letters to bishops, 1 A Word to a Freeholder, printed in 1748, and often reprinted until 1783 ; see also Journal, v. 343. 461 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS several of which we have given,1 he is seen to be at once finely courageous, tactful, and courteous. He approached the most highly placed as to the manner born ; but he never presumes, or hectors high or low, even when his services and influence were unquestionably large. In this group of letters, as always, Wesley's deepest interest is the spiritual welfare of men. He is an eager citizen and patriot, loyal to king and country; but he cannot close a letter without a personal appeal to its recipient. The dangers to the city of Man soul—the moral life of the soldiers—concern him far more than the siege of a city which they are called to protect against the nation's enemies. ' To tender our most dutiful Regards to your sacred Majesty.' This assurance of loyalty to George n. was prepared by Wesley when the King was alarmed by the threatened invasion of England. The Stuart Pretender to the throne was then in France, and had the support of the Papists. A month later France declared war. Convocation, the Protestant Dissenters, even the Quakers, presented loyal addresses to the King. This Address was not sent, as Charles Wesley thought that to present one in the name of the Methodists would seem to indicate that they were a sect, and separate from the Church of England. This view, everything which savoured of it, and all who held it, he abhorred. Had this Address been presented it might have killed earlier the baseless but persistent calumny that the Wesleys and their followers favoured the Pretender, or were otherwise disloyal.2 They were summoned before magistrates and suffered much annoyance on this false charge. Charles Wesley was arraigned because in public prayer he asked that God would 6 bring home His banished ones1—a scriptural euphemism for the restoration of sinners to divine favour. John Wesley published this Address in his Journal in 1758. 1 See pp. 133, 135, 259. To contradict this many chapels were later named 'Hanover' or * Brunswick,5 after the titles of the reigning House. 2 462 TO PUBLIC MEN To the Kings Most Excellent Majesty {George II.) The humble Address of the Societies in England and Wales in derision called Methodists. [LONDON, March 5, 1744.] inconsiderable as we are, 4 a people scattered and peeled, and trodden underfoot from the beginning hitherto,' we should in nowise have presumed, even on this great occasion, to open our lips to your Majesty, had we not been induced, indeed constrained to do so, by two considerations: the one, that in spite of all our remonstrances on that head, we are continually represented as a peculiar sect of men, separating ourselves from the Established Church ; the other, that we are still traduced as inclined to Popery, and consequently as disaffected to your Majesty. Upon these considerations we think it incumbent upon us, if we must stand as a distinct body from our brothers, to tender for ourselves our most dutiful regards to your sacred Majesty : and to declare, in the presence of Him we serve, the King of kings and Lord of lords, that we are a part (however mean) of that Protestant Church, established in these kingdoms: That we unite together for this, and no other end—to promote, so far as we may be capable, justice, mercy, and truth; the glory of God, and peace and good-will among men : That we detest and abhor the fundamental doctrines of the Church of Rome, and are steadily attached to your Majesty's royal person and illustrious House. We cannot, indeed, say or do either more or less than we apprehend consistent with the written word of God ; but we are ready to obey your Majesty to the uttermost, in all things which we conceive agreeable thereto. And we earnestly exhort all with whom we converse, as they fear God, to honour the King. We, of the clergy in particular, 463 MOST GRACIOUS SOVEREIGN,—SO JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS put all men in mind to revere the higher powers as of God ; and continually declare, ' Ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience"' sake.' Silver and gold (most of us must own) we have none; but such as we have we humbly beg your Majesty to accept, together with our hearts and prayers. May He who hath bought us with His blood, the Prince of all the kings of the earth, fight against all the enemies of your Majesty, with the two-edged sword which cometh out of His mouth ! And when He calleth your Majesty from this throne, full of years and victories, may it be with that voice, 6 Come, receive the kingdom prepared for thee, from the beginning of the world!' These are the continual prayers of your Majesty's dutiful and loyal subjects,—JOHN WESLEY, etc. Letters to the Mayor of Newcastle-on-Tyne and General Husk. Two letters to the Mayor of Newcastle-on-Tyne (Alderman Ridley) were sent while the city was fearing attack by the Young Pretender in 1745. News that he was at Edinburgh, and that the British under General Cope had fled before him, alarmed Newcastle citizens. The Mayor summoned all to meet him at the Town Hall. Wesley reached the city the day before this meeting, and begun at once to hold religious services. His non-attendance was noticed. Hence the first letter. The city prepared for a siege. Those who lived outside the walls removed within them, except Wesley and his helpers at the Orphan House, which was just beyond the Pilgrim Street gate. He thought it providential that these buildings were so placed that shells from cannon on the city walls would miss them and kill any approaching enemy. Some citizens thought otherwise. Hence Wesley's letter to General Husk, then directing protective measures. Wesley was most disturbed at the overflowing of ungodliness in the city, which not even these grave dangers inter464 WESLEY'S LETTER TO THE REV. DR. LESLIE Rector of Tanderagee near Belfast From C H A R L E M O N T 3 June 16, 1787 FACSIMILE from the ORIGINAL in the Collection of Mr. Russell J. Colman, D.L., J.P., Norwich THE TEXT of this LETTER is given on page 459 LETTERS OF JOHN WESLEY BY REV. GEORGE EAYRS, F.R.HIST.8. Published by Hodder & Stoughton, London, Toronto, New York 1916 J %?** av~*_ ^&l£3f ^ J ^ - , ***•***-*-*? fc^Cr&^^i- J &"/*&-£* A^Jfy^^. ^/>h**,r J&**~J^^ *~-^-sij*»*-aj* Arjy&>*~ <£***, J&^ SbJZr&x&a*^^-^/^^J^Js.v4»A*-*^ 4$ *-~£g^i£y & * . ^ ^^^_ 4? Jpez^aJk- /j&Tjkr**- -^ss &>%jui~J^ / r J "V^wT^ — <#" **-ji J H * " ' ^ - ^ £+^*~- *i &***ry « a ^ 4 ? , . £%£>a*L ^A^A^T J%z $<^^**&*--£y, y «*(Sv4/ yzu&fy /&<*** ' I had three armies against me,' says Haime—'the French Army, the wicked English Army, and an Army of Devils."* Wesley's request was passed to the General. Wesley visited and preached in the camp several times ; but he says in his Journal, ' I did not reach their hearts. The words of a scholar did not affect them like those of a dragoon or a grenadier." Finding some German soldiers there, he furbished up his knowledge of their language and preached to them also. In a few months the Young Pretender's cause collapsed. ' I reverence you for your Office and your Zeal.5 To the Worshipful the Mayor of Newcastle-on- Ty?ie, Alderman Ridley. [NEWCASTLE-ON-TYNE_, September 21, 1745.] SIR,—My not waiting upon you at the Town Hall was not owing to any want of respect. I reverence you for your office' sake, and much more for your zeal in the execution of it. I would to God every magistrate in the land would copy after such an example! Much less was it owing to any disaffection to His Majesty King George. But I 1 See Early Methodist Preachers, vols, i., iv. ; or Wesley's Veterans, edited by Rev. J. Telford. 2G 4*65 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS knew not how far it might be either necessary or proper for me to appear on such an occasion. I have no fortune at Newcastle : I have only the bread I eat, and the use of a little room for a few weeks in the year. All I can do for His Majesty, whom I honour and love— I think not less than I did my own father—is this, I cry unto God, day by day, in public and in private, to put all his enemies to confusion. And I exhort all that hear me to do the same; and, in their several stations, to exert themselves as loyal subjects ; who, so long as they fear God, cannot but honour the King. Permit me, Sir, to add a few words more, out of the fulness of my heart. I am persuaded you fear God, and have a deep sense that His kingdom ruleth over all. Unto whom, then (I may ask you), should we flee for succour, but unto Him whom, by our sins, we have j ustly displeased ? O, Sir, is it not possible to give any check to these overflowings of ungodliness ? To the open, flagrant wickedness, the drunkenness, and profaneness, which so abound, even in our streets ? I just take leave to suggest this. May the God whom you serve direct you in this, and all things! This is the daily prayer of, Sir, your obedient servant, for Christ^ sake. * I am ready to pull the House down.' To His Excellency General Hush. [ O R P H A N HOUSE, NEWCASTLE-ON-TYNE, October^, 1745.] surly man came to me this evening, as he said, from you. He would not deign to come upstairs to me, nor so much as into the house; but stood in the yard till I came, and then obliged me to go with him into the street, where he said, ; You must pull down the battle466 YOUR EXCELLENCY,—A TO PUBLIC MEN ments of your house, or to-morrow the General will pull them down for you.1 Sir, to me this is nothing. But I humbly conceive it would not be proper for this man, whoever he is, to behave in such a manner to any other of His Majesty's subjects, at so critical a time as this. I am ready, if it may be for His Majesty's service, to pull not only the battlements, but the house down; or to give up any part of it, or the whole, into your Excellency's hands. 'The poor Men to whom our Lives are entrusted.' To the Worshipful the Mayor of New castle-on-Tyne, Alderman Ridley. October 26, 1745. Sin,—The fear of God, the love of my country, and the regard I have for His Majesty King George, constrain me to write a few plain words to one who is no stranger to these principles of action. My soul has been pained day by day, even in walking the streets of Newcastle, at the senseless, shameless wickedness, the ignorant profaneness of the poor men to whom our lives are entrusted! The continual cursing, and swearing, the wanton blasphemy of the soldiers in general, must needs be a torture to the sober ear, whether of a Christian or an honest infidel. Can any that either fear God or love their neighbour, hear this without concern ? especially if they consider the interests of their country, as well as of these unhappy men themselves. For can it be expected, that God should be on their side who are daily affronting Him to His face ? And if God be not on their side, how little will either their number, or courage, or strength avail ? Is there no man that careth for these souls ? Doubtless there are some who ought so to do. But many of these, 467 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS if I am rightly informed, receive large pay, and do just nothing. I would to God it were in my power, in any degree, to supply their lack of service. I am ready to do what in me lies, to call these poor sinners to repentance, once or twice a day (while I remain in these parts), at any hour, or at any place. And I desire no pay at all for doing this; unless what my Lord shall give at His appearing. If it be objected (from our heathenish poet), ' This conscience will make cowards of us all,' 1 1 answer, Let us j udge by matter of fact. Let either friends or enemies speak. Did those who feared God behave as cowards at Fontenoy ? Did J[ohn] H[aime], the Dragoon, betray any cowardice, before or after his horse sunk under him ? Or did W[illiam] C[lements], when he received the first ball in his left, and the second in his right arm ? Of John Evans, when the cannon-ball took off both his legs ? Did he not call all about him, as long as he could speak, to praise and fear God, and honour the King ? as one who feared nothing but lest his last breath should be spent in vain. If it were objected, that I should only fill their heads with peculiar whims and notions, that might easily be known. Only let the officers hear with their own ears, and they may judge whether I do not preach the plain principles of manly, rational religion. Having myself no knowledge of the General, I took the liberty to make this offer to you. I have no interest herein; but I should rejoice to serve, as I am able, my King and country. If it be judged that this will be of no real service, let the proposal die, and be forgotten. But I beg you, Sir, 1 Incorrectly quoted from Shakespeare, Hamlet, m . i. 83. * Heathenish' is a strange adjective for Wesley to use of Shakespeare. He seldom quoted from him. A fine quarto copy of the poet's works survived Wesley's death, the margins of which were filled with critical notes in Wesley's handwriting. One of Wesley's preachers, John Pawson, destroyed it. 468 TO PUBLIC MEN to believe that I have the same glorious cause, for which you have shown so becoming a zeal, earnestly at heart; and that therefore, I am, with warm respect, Sir, your most obedient servant. ' An Offer of raising a Company of Volunteers.' West was Member of Parliament for St. Albans and joint Secretary to the Treasury. This letter to him was enclosed in one by Wesley, of the same date, to Ebenezer Blackwell, the influential London banker. Its occasion is there explained (page 381). England seemed in need of help from every patriot. Wesley offered soldiers,1 and hurried to Bristol to help a parliamentary candidate, John Spencer. He was defeated. Charles Wesley republished his Hymns for Times of Trouble and Persecution, and set the Methodists singing— ' Ye servants of God, Your Master proclaim.' George Whitefield fulminated against Romanists. We can trace no acceptance of Wesley's offer; but his letter exhibits his patriotism and practicality. The original of this valuable letter is in the British Museum (Addit. MSS., 1882-1887, 32,685, Auto. Letters, No. 12, on page 64). Perhaps Wesley's anxiety to help the cause of the aged king, George n., who was then seventy-two, was quickened by his recollection of impressions received a few weeks earlier. On December 23, 1755, he wrote in his Journal, 6 I was in the robe-chamber adjoining to the House of Lords when the King put on his robes. His brow was much furrowed with age, and quite clouded with care. And is this all the world can give, even to a king ? All the grandeur it can afford ? A blanket of ermine round his shoulders, so heavy and cumbersome he can scarce move under it! A huge heap of borrowed hair, with a few plates of gold and glittering stones upon his head! Alas, what a bauble is human greatness! And even this will not endured 1 As he did in 1779 (see p. 257). 469 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS To the Honourable James West. [MARLBOROUGH], March I, 1756. SIR,—A few days since, Mr. Whitefield and I desired a friend to ask your advice,—to whom it would be proper to make an offer of raising a company of volunteers for His Majesty's service. We apprehended the number would be about five hundred. Finding Mr. Whitefield has since been persuaded that such an offer is premature, I am constrained to make the following, independently of him : To raise, for His Majesty's service, at least two hundred volunteers, to be supported by contributions among themselves ; and to be ready, in case of invasion, to act for a year, if needed so long, at His Majesty's pleasure; only within — miles of London. If this be acceptable to His Majesty, they beg to have arms out of the Tower, giving the usual security for their return; and some of His Majesty's sergeants to instruct them in the military exercise. I am now hastening to Bristol, on account of the election; but if my return to London would be of any service, you may command, Sir, your obedient servant. ' Most of the present Stage Entertainments are peculiarly hurtful to a Trading City.' Here is the only reference to the theatre traced in Wesley's Letters or his Works. His courteous and tactful presentation of his views, and the gravamen of his opposition to the proposed theatre, as likely to be injurious to the commercial interests of the city, will be noted. Wesley had read the prophet Jeremiah's letter to the captive Jews in Babylon : 4 Seek the peace of the city, whither I have caused you to be carried away captive.' The Wesleys and the Methodists had wrought for twenty-five years in Bristol and Kingswood, ¥10 TO PUBLIC MEN and it was common knowledge that all the best interests had profited thereby. Wesley prepared this letter in London and sent it to his brother Charles, then residing in Bristol, with a note saying, ' 1 suppose it is of little consequence in whose hand this is transcribed. Let it be accompanied by prayer, and good must follow one way or the other.** To the Mayor and Corporation of Bristol. December 20, 1764. GENTLEMEN,—Both my brother and I, and all who have any connection with us, are extremely sensible of our obligations to you for the civility which you have shown us on all occasions; and we cannot but feel ourselves deeply interested in whatever we apprehend in any degree to concern your honour or the general good and prosperity of the city of Bristol. This occasions my giving you the present trouble, which (whether it has any farther effect or no) you will please to receive as a testimony of the high regard which we shall ever retain for you. The endeavours lately used to procure subscriptions for building a new play-house in Bristol have given us not a little concern, and that on various accounts. Not barely as most of the present stage entertainments sap the foundation of all religion, as they naturally tend to efface all traces of piety and seriousness out of the minds of men; but as they are particularly hurtful to a trading city; giving a wrong turn to youth especially, gay, trifling, and directly opposite to the spirit of industry and close application to business; and as drinking and debauchery of every kind are constant attendants on these entertainments, with indolence, effeminacy, and idleness, which affect trade in a high degree. It was on these very considerations that the corporation of Nottingham lately withstood all solicitations and absolutely forbade the building of a new theatre there, being 471 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS determined to encourage nothing of the kind. And I doubt not but that thousands will reap the benefit of their wise and generous resolution. I t does not become me, Gentlemen, to press anything upon you, but I could not avoid saying this much, both in behalf of myself and all my friends. Wishing you the continuance and increase of every blessing.—I remain, Gentlemen, your obliged and obedient servant. To the Prime Minister, Lord North. This historic and highly important letter is now first given with completeness.1 The year when it was written was critical indeed in the relations between Great Britain and the American Colonies, as before pointed out.2 It was sent to Lord North, then British Premier. As Tyerman reminds us, it was written within forty-eight hours of the Battle of Bunker's Hill, Boston, where its predictions, sadly and disastrously for Britain, were fulfilled. The original would be as fascinating a document as the letter from leading Boston citizens pleading with George in., which is inspected with so much interest, especially by Americans, in the Record Office, Fetter Lane, London. A copy of the letter to Lord North was sent to Lord Dartmouth, Secretary for the Colonies. This copy was in existence in 1866. The letter is of scarcely less importance as a self-revelation of Wesley. Seldom does a man write so candidly of himself or so courageously to a man in high place, and seldom has a hot, complicated issue been so dispassionately, clearly, or more ably j udged, or with such Christian patriotism. Wesley 1 Its history is curious. It was buried among British national documents, unseen and unheard of until published by the Rev. Samuel Dunn in his Wesley Banner, vol. i. p. 177, 1849, from which we give i t Dr. George Smith gave it seventeen years later in his History of Methodism, vol. i. App. E. The last strong paragraph is given only by Tyerman {Life of Wesley', vol. iii. p. 200), who strangely omits half the long opening paragraph of the letter. See also Journal, vol. vi. p. 67. 2 See above, p. 247. 472 TO PUBLIC MEN had reliable correspondents, and had taken trouble to form a fine judgement upon the situation. He shows himself a true prophet—a forthteller and a foreteller. He has heard a great voice behind him, in history. He knows how to use the word ' Remember.** It booms like a solemn bell at the end of his letter. ' Is it Common Sense to use Force towards the Americans ?' To the Right Honourable Lord North. ARMAGH, June 15, 1775. M Y LORD,—I would not speak, as it may seem to be concerning myself with things that lie out of my province, but I dare not refrain from it any longer. I think silence in the present case would be a sin against God, against my country, and against my own soul. But what hope can I have of doing good, of making the least impression upon your Lordship, when so many have spoken in vain, and those far better qualified to speak on so delicate a subject. They were better qualified in some respects; in others they were not. They had not less bias upon their minds; they were not free from worldly hopes and fears. Their passions were engaged; and how easily do those blind the eyes of their understanding. They were not more impartial; most of them were prej udiced in the highest degree. They neither loved the King nor his ministers; rather they hated them with a perfect hatred; and your Lordship knows that you could not, if you were a man, avoid having some prejudice to them. In this case it would be hardly possible to feel the full force of their arguments. They had not better means of information, of knowing the real tempers and sentiments either of the Americans on the one hand, or the English, Irish, or Scots on the other. Above all, they trusted in 473 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS themselves, in their own power of convincing and persuading; I trust only in the living God, who hath the hearts of all men in His hands. And whether my writing do any good or no, it need do no harm, for it rests within your Lordship's breast whether any eye but your own shall see it. I do not intend to enter upon the question, whether the Americans are in the right or in the wrong ?—Here all my prejudices are against the Americans, for I am a High Churchman, the son of a High Churchman, bred up from my childhood in the highest notions of passive obedience and non-resistance; and yet, in spite of all my long-rooted prejudices, I cannot avoid thinking, if I think at all, these, an oppressed people, asked for nothing more than their legal rights, and that in the most modest and inoffensive manner that the nature of the thing would allow. But waiving this, waiving all considerations of right and wrong, I ask, Is it common sense to use force towards the Americans? A letter now before me, which I received yesterday, says, ' Four hundred of the regulars and forty of the militia were killed in the late skirmish.' What a disproportion is this ! And this is the first essay of raw men against regular troops. You see, my Lord, whatever has been affirmed, these men will not be frightened ; and it seems they will not be conquered so easily as was at first imagined. They will probably dispute every inch of ground, and if they die, die sword in hand. Indeed, some of our valiant officers say, ' Two thousand men will clear America of these rebels.*' No, nor twenty thousand, be they rebels or not, nor perhaps treble that number. They are as strong men as you; they are as valiant as you, if not abundantly more valiant, for they are one and all enthusiasts—enthusiasts for liberty. They are calm, deliberate enthusiasts ; and we know how this principle breathes into softer souls stern love of war, and thirst of vengeance, and contempt of death. 474 TO PUBLIC MEN We know men, animated with this spirit, will leap into a fire, or rush into a cannon's mouth. ' But they have no experience in war/ And how much more have our troops ?—Very few of them ever saw a battle. ' But they have no discipline.' That is an entire mistake. Already they have near as much as our army, and they will learn more of it every day; so that in a short time, if the fatal occasion continue, they will understand it as well as their assailants. ' But they are divided amongst themselves.' So you are informed by various letters and memorials. So, doubt not, was poor Rehoboam informed concerning the ten tribes! So, nearer our own times, was Philip informed concerning the people of the Netherlands. No, my Lord, they are terribly united. Not in the province of New England only, but down as low as the Jerseys and Pennsylvania. The bulk of the people are so united, that to speak a word in favour of the present English measures, would almost endanger a man's life. Those who informed me of this, one of whom was with me last week, lately come from Philadelphia, are no sycophants ; they say nothing to curry favour; they have nothing to gain or lose by me. But they speak with sorrow of heart, what they have seen with their own eyes, and heard with their own ears. These men think, one and all, be it right or wrong, that they are contending, pro aris and focis; for their wives, children, and liberty. What an advantage have they herein over many that fight only for pay ! None of whom care a straw for the cause wherein they are engaged; most of whom strongly disapprove of it. Have they not another considerable advantage ? Is there occasion to recruit the troops ? Their supplies are at hand, and all round about them. Ours are three thousand miles off! Are we then able to conquer the Americans, suppose they are left to themselves, suppose all our neighbours should stand stock still, and leave us 475 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS and them to fight it out ? But we are not sure of this. Nor are we sure that all our neighbours will stand stock still. I doubt they have not promised i t ; and if they had, could we rely upon those promises ? Yet, it is not probable, they will send ships or men to America. Is there not a shorter way ? Do they not know where England and Ireland lie ? And have they not troops, as well as ships, in readiness ? All Europe is well apprised of this; only the English know nothing of the matter! What if they find means to land but ten thousand men ? Where are the troops in England or Ireland to oppose them ? Why, cutting the throats of their brethren in America! Poor England, in the mean time! ' But we have our militia—our valiant, disciplined militia. These will effectually oppose them.' Give me leave, my Lord, to relate a little circumstance, of which I was informed by a clergyman who knew the fact. In 1716 a large body of militia were marching towards Preston against the rebels. In a wood which they were passing by a boy happened to discharge his fowling-piece. The soldiers gave in all for lost, and, by common consent, threw down their arms and ran for life. So much dependence is to be placed on our valorous militia. But, my Lord, this is not all. We have thousands of enemies, perhaps more dangerous than French or Spaniards. As I travel four or five thousand miles every year, I have an opportunity of conversing freely with more persons of every denomination than any one else in the three kingdoms. I cannot but know the general disposition of the people— English, Scots, and Irish; and I know a large majority of them are exasperated almost to madness. Exactly so they were throughout England and Scotland, about the year 1640, and in a great measure by the same means : by inflammatory papers which were spread, as they are now, with the utmost 476 TO PUBLIC MEN diligence, in every corner of the land. Hereby the bulk of the population were effectually cured of all love and reverence for the King. So that, first despising, then hating him, they were just ripe for open rebellion. And, I assure your Lordship, so they are now. They want nothing but a leader. Two circumstances more are deserving to be considered : the one, that there was at that time a decay of general trade almost throughout the kingdom; the other, there was a common dearness of provisions. The case is the same in both respects at this day. So that even now there are multitudes of people, that, having nothing to do, and nothing to eat, are ready for the first bidder; and that, without inquiring into the merits of the cause, would flock to any who would give them bread. Upon the whole, I am really sometimes afraid that this evil is from the Lord. When I consider the astonishing luxury of the rich, and the shocking impiety of rich and poor, I doubt whether general dissoluteness of manners does not demand a general visitation. Perhaps the decree is already gone forth from the Governor of the world. Perhaps even now, f As he that buys, surveys a ground, So the destroying* angel measures it around. Calm he surveys the perishing nation; Ruin behind him stalks, and empty desolation/ But we Englishmen are too wise to acknowledge that God has anything to do in the world ! Otherwise should we not seek Him by fasting and prayer, before He lets the lifted thunder drop ? O my Lord, if your Lordship can do anything, let it not be wanting! For God's sake, for the sake of the king, of the nation, of your lovely family, remember Rehoboam! Remember Philip the Second! Remember Charles the First! I am, with true regard, My Lord, Your Lordship's obedient servant. 477 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS * I have . . . Silver Tea-spoons.' Wesley's famous reply to the Commissioners of Excise must surely be among the most striking of the curious replies which such officers receive. In 1776 the House of Lords ordered that circular letters should be sent to all persons who, having silver-plate, had made no return of it or had failed to pay duty. Among the former, Wesley was addressed. A special letter to him, dated September £, accompanied the circular. I t stated that the Commissioners could not doubt he had plate, and they required an immediate answer concerning it. This was sent a week later, when Wesley had reached his Bristol lodgings, in the New Room in the Horsefair, and could see what plate he had there. With his usual carefulness of paper, significant in this instance, he wrote the following reply on the back of the circular of inquiry. As ever, Wesley points a moral with his reply. I t is also interesting to note that he did not part with the four silver spoons he had. He liked the refinements of life. To His Majesty's Officer of Excise. BRISTOL, September 9, 1776. SIR,—I have two silver tea-spoons at London and two at Bristol. This is all the plate which I have at present. And I shall not buy any more while so many round me want bread.—I am, Sir, your most humble servant. On Voltaire. Wesley and Voltaire had nothing in common, as these two letters show. The life of each of them almost covered the eighteenth century and was profoundly influential; but they were as sharply contrasted in conduct and character l as the result of their life and labour—the Reign of Terror 1 Dr. W. J. Townsend points out features of this contrast in A New History of Methodism, i. 367-8. 478 TO PUBLIC MEN in France and the peaceful revolution in England. Wesley speaks elsewhere of the ' infernal subtlety' of Voltaire. H e puts Rousseau and Voltaire together, and describes the former as ; a shallow yet supercilious infidel, two degrees below Voltaire. He is a mere misanthrope; a cynic all over. So indeed is his brother-infidel, Voltaire, and wellnigh as great a coxcomb.'' Our first letter is given by Tyerman, 1 but without the name of its recipient. Wesley's reference to the dying hours of ' t h a t wretched infidel,'' Voltaire, was published in his Journal under date September, 1778. He had just copied it from Fletcher's letter to James Ireland of Bristol. Our second letter, 2 from the original in the United Methodist Theological College, Sheffield, names the royal chaplain with whom Wesley is so indignant. Delamotte, to whom this letter was sent, was then at Barrow, Lincolnshire. He was Wesley's companion to Georgia in 1735. 6 Voltaire . . . to whom a crowned Head pays such a violent Compliment.' To an Unknown Correspondent. [LONDON], January 4, 1779. SIR,—In September last, a gentleman, near Bristol, showed me a letter which he had received from the Rev. Mr. Fletcher, at Paris. I desired him to give a transcript of one part of it, which he immediately did. It was as follows :— 'Mr. Voltaire sent for Monsieur Tronchin, 3 first physician 1 Wesley's Life, iii. 288. Published in the Wesley Hist. Soc. Proceedings, vol. vii. 19, from contribution to MS. Journal by the present writer. 3 Dr. Tronchin is wrongly named in Wesley's Journal (September 1778) as Fronchin, and by Tyerman {Life of Wesley, vol. iii. p. 289) as Tronchils. Tallentyre says that Tronchin was a sincere Christian, and that he wrote bitterly of Voltaire's deathbed. He adds, * for three hours Voltaire was dying—calmly and peacefully say some; in all the horrors of the damned, say others. But the truth, who knows?'—Life of Voltaire, 3rd ed. (1905), pp. 516-519. 2 479 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS to the Duke of Orleans (one of his converts to infidelity), and said to him, "Sir, I desire you will save my life. I will give you half my fortune if you will lengthen out my days only six months. If not, I shall go to the devil, and carry you with me."' This is the man to whom a crowned head pays such a violent compliment! Nay, this is the man whose works are now publishing by a divine of our own Church; yea, a chaplain to His Majesty. Pity but the King; should know it. If the publisher of that poor wretch's works writes a panegyric upon him or them, I shall think it my duty to show the real value of those writings.—I am, Sir, your humble servant. 6 That wretched Infidel.' To Charles Delamotte. LONDON, February 11, 1779. M Y DEAR BROTHER,—I am agreeably surprised with a letter from my old friend whom I long desired to see, and how I missed of seeing you when I was last at Barrow I cannot comprehend. I t is very probable I shall have some more work to do with regard to that wretched infidel. For if Dr. Bealey, the publisher of his Works > prefixes to them a flaming Panegyric, I shall think it my duty to deal exceeding plainly both with the author and the translator. I am now in my seventy-sixth year, and am by the wonderful mercy of God in at least as good health as I was in my twenty-sixth, and in some respects better. So when it pleases Him, ' He bids the sun of Life stand still, And stops the panting- soul.' I am glad you speak a word to your brethren on behalf 480 TO PUBLIC MEN of your good Master. This is worth living for.—Believe me to be, as ever, dear Charles, your affectionate brother. ' A Motion in Parliament for raising the Militia and exercising them on Sunday.' This skilful letter, often given without the name of the nobleman and minister of the Crown to whom it was addressed, was sent to Lord Shelburne,1 afterwards first Marquis of Lansdowne. He was now Home Secretary under Chatham, and next year First Lord of the Treasury. The ' No Popery' Riots led by Lord George Gordon 2 two years before, the war with America, still proceeding, and continental attacks on Britain showed the need for efficient soldiers. But Wesley thought that conditions could not arise which would justify the training of soldiers on the Lord's Day. 3 His Conference in the August of this year adopted regulations under which any Methodist who practised military exercises on Sundays, or witnessed them after warning, was to be expelled from membership. To Lord Shelburne. LONDON (?), December 7, 1782. M Y LORD,—-If I wrong your lordship, I am sorry for i t ; but I really believe your lordship fears God, and I hope your lordship has no unfavourable opinion of the Christian revelation. This encourages me to trouble your lordship with a few lines, which otherwise I should not take upon me to do. About thirty years ago a motion was made in Parliament for raising and embodying the Militia, and for exercising them, to save time, on Sunday. When the motion was like 1 See Whitehead's Life of Wesley (1796), vol. ii. p. 399, and its unpaged index under ' Wesley, John. 5 2 As a prominent Protestant Wesley visited Lord George Gordon while he was imprisoned in the Tower of London for high treason and insurrection. 3 See above, p. 227. 2H 481 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS to pass an old gentleman stood up and said, ' Mr. Speaker, I have one objection to this : I believe an old book called the Bible/ The members looked at one another and the motion was dropped. Must not all others who believe the Bible have the same objection ? And, from what I have seen, I cannot but think these are still three-fourths of the nation. Now, setting religion out of the question, is it expedient to give such a shock to so many millions of people at once? And certainly it would shock them extremely: it would wound them in a very tender part. For would not they, would not all England, would not all Europe, consider this as a virtual repeal of the Bible? And would not all serious persons say, 6 We have little religion in the land now, but by this step we shall have less still. For wherever this pretty show is to be seen, the people will flock together, and will lounge away so much time before and after it that the churches will be emptier than they are already/ My lord, I am concerned for this on a double account: First, because I have personal obligations to your lordship, and would fain, even for this reason, recommend your lordship to the love and esteem of all over whom I have any influence. Secondly, because I now reverence your lordship for your office1 sake, and believe it to be my bounden duty to do all that is in my little power to advance your lordship's influence and reputation. Will your lordship permit me to add a word in my oldfashioned way ? I pray Him that has all power in heaven and earth to prosper all your endeavours for the public good, and am, my lord, your lordship's willing servant. To the Prime Minister, William Pitt. Though only twenty-five years of age, William Pitt was British Prime Minister, and would be interested by this 483 TO PUBLIC MEN letter from such an eminent venerable supporter, Wesley, then eighty-one. The original x of this famous letter is in the Colman Collection, from which our text of it is given, with interesting corrections and additions to that usually given. Any public man would welcome such a message-— informing, shrewd, solicitous, tactful, but faithful, as from an ambassador of the King of Kings. 'New Taxes . . . smuggling Villains . . . the Distillery . . . that Scandal of the English Nation, Suicide.' Thomas Ellison was Wesley's nephew, to whom Pitt, at Wesley's instance, had given an appointment in the Excise. Webb is Captain Thomas Webb, 2 now back from the United States to end his days in England. Wesley felt that the old servant of the Crown and of Christ deserved comfort. Paragraph 5 recalls Wesley's vigorous pamphlet published eleven years earlier, Thoughts on the Present Scarcity of Provisions. Bread corn was dear, he contended, because such immense quantities were wasted i n ' distilling, . . . that bane of health, that destroyer of strength, of life and virtue.' What did Pitt with his 'benevolent heart' feel as to Wesley's proposed deterrent to the crime of suicide ? In his Arminian Magazine for 1790 Wesley republished his proposal, since ' there is no country in Europe, or perhaps in the habitable world, where the horrid crime of self-murder is so common as in England.' The spread of Wesley's gospel of hope helped to reduce the number of cases of this sad crime and of other crimes. To the Right Honourable William Pitt, M.P. BATH, September 6, 1784. SIR,—Your former goodness, shown to one of my relations, Mr. Thomas Ellison, emboldens me to take the liberty of recommending to your notice an old friend, Lieutenant 1 It was written by an amanuensis and is endorsed in Wesley's own hand2 writing, To Mr. Pitt, Sept. 6, 1784, See p. 244. 483 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Webb. On my mentioning formerly some of his services to Lord North, his lordship was pleased ;,to order him £100 a year. But as it has since been reduced, it is hardly a maintenance for him and his family, If you would be so good as to remember him in this or any other way, I should esteem it a particular favour. Will you excuse me, Sir, for going out of my province by hinting a few things which have been long upon my mind ? If those hints do not deserve any further notice they may be forgiven and forgotten. New taxes must undoubtedly be imposed. But may not more money be produced by the old ones ? For instance : 1. When the Land tax is four shillings in the pound, I know some towns which pay regularly seven or five pence! Nay, I know one town where they pay one penny in the pound ! Is there no help for this ? 2. As to the Window tax : I know a gentleman who has near a hundred windows in his house, and he told me he paid for twenty. 3. The same gentleman told me: ' We have above a hundred men servants in this house, but not above ten are paid for.' 4. I firmly believe that, in Cornwall alone, the King is defrauded of half a million yearly in customs. What does this amount to in all Great Britain ? Surely not so little as five millions.1 5. Servants of distillers inform me that their masters do not pay for a fortieth part of what they distil. And this duty last year (if I am rightly informed) amounted only to twenty thousand pounds. But have not the spirits distilled this year cost twenty thousand lives of His Majesty's liege subjects? Is it not then the blood of these men? Vilely 1 Is there no way of extirpating these smuggling villains, notwithstanding their Honourable or Right Honourable abetters ? 484 TO PUBLIC MEN bartered for twenty thousand pounds, not to say anything of the enormous wickedness which has been occasioned thereby. And not to suppose that these poor wretches have any souls. But to consider money alone. Is the king a gainer, or an immense loser by the Distillery ? To say nothing of many millions of quarters of corn destroyed, which, if exported, would have added more than twenty thousand pounds to the revenue. Be it considered, 6 Dead men pay no taxes.' So that, by the death of twenty thousand persons yearly (and this computation is far under the mark), the revenue loses far more than it gains. But I may urge another consideration to YOU. YOU are a man. You have not lost human feelings. You do not love to drink human blood. You are a son of Lord Chatham. Nay, if I mistake not, you are a Christian. Dare you then sustain a sinking nation ? Is the God whom you serve able to deliver from ten thousand enemies ? I believe He is. Nay, and you believe it. O, may you fear nothing but displeasing Him ! May I add a word on another head ? How would your benevolent heart rejoice if a stop could be put to that scandal of the English nation, suicide ? The present laws against it avail nothing, for every such murderer is brought in non compos. If he was poor, the j urors forswear themselves from pity. If he was rich, they hope to be well paid for it. So no ignominy pursues either the living or the dead, and self-murder increases daily. But what help ? I conceive this horrid crime might be totally prevented, and that without doing the least hurt either to the living or the dead. Do you not remember, Sir, how the rage for self-murder among the Spartan matrons was stopped at once ? x Would it not have the same effect in England, if 1 By ordering that every woman that killed herself should be dragged naked through the streets of the city. 485 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS an Act of Parliament were passed, repealing all other Acts, and appointing that every self-murderer, lunatic or not, should be hanged in chains ? Suppose your influence could prevent suicide by this means, and distilling by making it a felony, you would do more service to your country than any Prime Minister has done this hundred years. Your name would be precious to all true Englishmen as long as England continued a nation. And, what is infinitely more, a greater Monarch than King George would say to you, ' Well done, good and faithful servant.' I earnestly commit you to His care, and am. Sir, your willing servant. ' If this is not Oppression, what is ? . . . Speak a Word to Mr. Pitt. 5 Nothing but wilful ignorance and cruel animus can explain this persecution of the Methodists which moved Wesley to write to this member of Parliament. His name has not been traced. They had now been at work more than half a century, and by common consent their influence was wholly for good. If the member ' will speak a word to Mr. Pitt,' who was still Premier, ' on that head,** he will learn that. But miserable jacks-in-office still continued, and long after this period, to torment the Methodists where and when they dare do so. As we have shown (page 133), Wesley and some Methodists played into their hands. This letter was written ten years later than the painful one to a Bishop there given. The present harrying of the Methodists in Somersetshire was headed by a lawyer who boasted that he would drive Methodism out of the county. Wesley calmly remarked, ' Yes, when he can drive God out of it."'* The veteran leader spent six weeks of the autumn there, 1 486 Tyerman, Wesley, vol. iii* p. 512. TO PUBLIC MEN incessantly travelling and preaching, although he was now eighty-seven.1 To a Member of Parliament. Autumn, 1790. SIR,—Last month a few people met together in Somersetshire, to pray, and praise God, in a friend's house. There was no preaching at all. Two neighbouring justices fined the man of the house twenty pounds. I suppose he was not worth twenty shillings. Upon this, his household goods were distrained and sold, to pay the fine. He appealed to the Quarter-Sessions; but all the justices averred the Methodists could have no relief from the Act of Toleration because they went to church ; and that, so long as they did so, the Conventicle Act should be executed upon them. Last Sunday, when one of our preachers was beginning to speak to a quiet congregation, a neighbouring justice sent a constable to seize him, though he was licensed, and would not release him until he had paid twenty pounds, telling him his licence was good for nothing, because he was a churchman. Now, Sir, what can the Methodists do ? They are liable to be ruined by the Conventicle Act, and they have no relief from the Act of Toleration ! If this is not oppression, what is ? Where, then, is English liberty ? the liberty of Christians ? yea? of every rational creature, who, as such, has a right to worship God according to his conscience ? But, waiving the question of right and wrong, what prudence is there in oppressing such a body of loyal subjects ? If these good magistrates could drive them not only out of Somersetshire but out of England, who would be gainers thereby ? 1 But while at Bath on Sunday, September 5, he says, * I cut off that vile custom, I know not how or when it began, of preaching three times a day by the same preacher to the same congregation ; enough to weary out both the bodies and minds of the speaker, as well as his hearers.' 487 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Not His Majesty, whom we honour and love; not his Ministers, whom we love and serve for his sake. Do they wish to throw away so many thousand friends, who are now bound to them by stronger ties than that of interest ? If you will speak a word to Mr. Pitt on that head, you will oblige, etc. To William Wilberforce, M.P. This selection of letters from those written by Wesley may be appropriately closed with the last letter which he wrote. I t was to a public man. Its date is six days before that of Wesley's death. He wrote it at the house of his friend and executor, George Wolff of Balham. The fact that it was his last letter, the subject of the letter—the abolition of the trade in slaves, and the undying fame of Wilberforce, to whom the letter was sent, all give it unique interest. I t is one of the notable letters of the world. ' Opposing that execrable Villainy, which is the Scandal of Religion, of England, and of Human Nature.' Four years earlier Wesley met John Howard, and sent him forward greatly heartened to cleanse the prisons of Europe. Here he is seen locking his shield with that of Wilberforce over the trembling form of the negro slave, for whom he must fight contra mundum, against the world. As early as 1758 Wesley gave Christian baptism to Gilbert's negro slaves.1 In 1774 he issued his Thoughts upon Slavery? a booklet of twenty pages, compact of history, argument, passion, and compassion, which ought to be reprinted whenever and wherever this horrible crime and sin reappears. 4 Away with all whips, all chains and compulsion,' cried Wesley. He rejoiced greatly when his American followers, 1 2 488 See above, p. 237. Works, vol. xi. pp. 59-79. TO PUBLIC MEN Freeborn Garrettson and Philip Gatch, 1 voluntarily set free their slaves. He wrote twice to encourage Thomas Clarkson and the committee for the abolition of the slave trade, and promised to reprint and circulate his pamphlet. Wilberforce called on him in 1789 and found him ' a fine old fellow.' Wesley wrote, ' We had an agreeable and useful conversation. What a blessing it is to Mr. Pitt to have such a friend as this.' As Wesley foresaw, Wilberforce and his helpers needed such divine resources as this letter claims for them. Sixteen years elapsed before this infamous trade was made illegal (January 1,1808). Slavery lingered much longer. 2 To William Wilberforce. LONDON, February 24, 1791. M Y DEAR SIB,—Unless the divine Power has raised you up to be as Athanasius contra mundum, I see not how you can go through your glorious enterprise, in opposing that execrable villainy, which is the scandal of religion, of England, and of human nature. Unless God has raised you up for this very thing, you will be worn out by the opposition of men and devils; but, if God be for you, who can be against you ? Are all of them together stronger than God ? O ! ' be not weary in well doingS Go on, in the name of God, and in the power of His might, till even American slavery (the vilest that ever saw the sun) shall vanish before it. Reading, this morning, a tract, written by a poor African, I was particularly struck by that circumstance—that a man who has a black skin, being wronged or outraged by a white 1 A New History of Methodism, vol. p. ii. 8o. On American Methodists and Slavery, see ibid., pp. 119, 127, 175 et seq. a ' Methodists put all their strength into the battle for freedom. Out of 352,404 Nonconformist signatures to petitions to Parliament on that behalf, 229,426 were those of Methodists.'—Rev. J. Telford's A Sect that Moved the Worlds Chapter iv. J. R. Green connects the abolition of slavery with the Methodist Revival. 489 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS man, can have no redress; it being a law, in our colonies, that the oath of a black, against a white, goes for nothing. What villainy is this ? That He who has guided you, from your youth up, may continue to strengthen you in this and all things, is the prayer of, dear sir, your affectionate servant, JOHN WESLEY. 490 INDEX NOTE.—The name of John Wesley is seldom used in this Index, except in references to his Works, and where it occurs in the alphabetical order. The name is assumed as the basis of many entries. So expanded, the first entry would read—Aberdeen, John Wesletfs visits to. Tinder Wesley, J o h n , and some other entries where the references are numerous, an inner Index is given in alphabetical order. ABERDEEN, visits to, 150, 317. Account of J. and H. A. Rogers•, 373. Act of Supremacy, The, 16; of Toleration, 133, 487 ; of Uniformity, 17; for Conventicles, 100, 487 ; Five Mile, 12. Acts of Apostles, exposition of the, 95. Adam Bede, Dinah Morris in, 362. Address to the Clergy, Wesley's, 424, 429. ' A Friend,' Letter to, 113. America, as missionary in, 25, 57 ; proposed visit to, 240, 278. American colonies, on the war with the, 145, 247 et seq., 472. Methodism and Methodists, in 1769, 124; statistics, 237; Letters and, 237-287; and war with England, 241 ; and publishing, 245 ; and education, 282; and the Church of England, 264; wealth of, 267. Amherst, Nova Scotia, 259. Amsterdam, visit to, 171. Anabaptists, 21, 94, 96. Ancient History, Rollin's, 448, 450. Annapolis, Maryland, 286. Annesley, Samuel (grandfather), 13, 70. Antigua, West Indies, N. Gilbert and, 180, 238, 273. Antimonianism condemned, 261. Apparitions, opinions on, 403, 406. Appeals to individuals, 38, 455, 458 ; Baxter's, 455. to Men of Reason and Religion, Wesley's, 26, 435. Armagh, Letter from, 186, 473. Arminianism, evangelical, 102, 103, 408. Arminian Magazine, 27, 121, 215, 226, 453, 460. Arminius, Jacobus, 144. Armstrong, Robert, 227. Arnold, Matthew, 4 ; quoted, 20. Art of Thinking, The, Wesley on, 427. Asbury, Francis, the Wesley of America, 199, 243 et seq. ; Wesley and, 278 ; Briggs's Life of, 192; Letters to, 263, 279; states his claim as bishop, 279. *A Serious Clergyman,' Letter to, 107. Assurance of salvation, doctrine of, 40; S. Wesley, Senior, and, 48, 58, 160. Athanasius, Wilberforce likened to, 489. Athlone, Letter from, 87. Atlay, John, opposes Wesley, 206, 212; helps Heath, 282. Atterbury, Bishop, 43 ; style of, 437. Augustine, Wesley and, 24, 37. 491 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS ' A Worshipper among the Method- Benson, Joseph, 130, 138; Letters to, 154-165, 257. ists,' Letter to, 116. Beresford, Miss, a 'dear friend,' BACONIAN argument, use of the, 374. 58, 430. Berridge, John, inquiries about, 88. Bacup, Methodists at, 166. Beverley, visit to, 10. Bagshaw, Matthew, 212, 215. Bible, the, cited in Parliament, 482. Baird, Lady, of London, and Method- ' Bible Christian,' a, 156. ists, 405, 407. Bills, accommodation, denounced, Ballinrobe, Ireland, Letters from, 216. 250, 252. Birmingham, visit to, 282, 366; Baltimore, U.S.A., Asbury conseLetters from, 139, 166. crated at, 199; historic conference Birstal, Yorkshire, 130; Letter from, at, 262, 265. 321. Band-meetings, Methodist, 69, 94, 4 Bishop,' title of, disliked, 278. 96, 369. Bishops, Letters to unnamed, 133, Bandon, Ireland, Letter from, 336. 135. Baptism, sacrament of, exclusion for Black, William, Canada, 259 et seq.; administering, 229. See also SacraLetters to, 259-261, 265, 270, 273, ments. 275, 276, 284, 285. Bardsley, Samuel, Letters to, 224. Blackwell, Ebenezer, of London, Barker, William, preacher, 196. ' most intimate lay friend,' 32, 37, Barnard Castle, difficulties at, 150, 127, 144, 288; and Wesley's 207. preaching, 291; Letters to, 305Barrow, Lines., Delamotte at, 479, 350; Letters from, to Wesley, 480. 293> 338Bath, N at, 74 ; scene with Nash Mrs. E., 290 et seq., 301, 305, at, 99 ; collection for, 105 ; trouble 313, 349, 352. at, 125; debts at, 178; Letters Richard, 148. from, 230, 364, 483; a ' vile cusBlundell's School, Tiverton, S.Wesley tom ' at, 487. (brother) and, 56. Baxter, Richard, Life of, 17; on church membership, 115; visita- Boaden, E., and Everett's MSS., ix. tion plan of, 163 ; personal appeals Boardman, Richard, 152, 231; volunteers for America, 241, 245, 287. of, 455Bogie, James, Methodist preacher, Bayley, Dr. Cornelius, 174, 225, 149. 226. Bohler, Peter, London Moravian, Bealey, Dr., and Voltaire, 480. 26. Beauchamp, Mr., of Limerick, 455, Bolton, Lanes., Letters from, 224, 458. 232. Beauland, John, 196. Edward, Wesley at home of, Beccles, visit to, 199. 365Bedford, visit to, 75, 336. Miss Nancy, 36, 365 ; Letters Duke of, 203. to, 366-369. Behmen, Jacob, and Mysticism, 460. Bonner, Charles, Bristol, 96. Belchier, Mr., Wesley's Letters en- Bookmaris Letters, A> Sir W. R. closed to, 301, 326, 334. Nicoll's, 328. Belfast, Wride at, 188; attack on, Bosanquet, Miss M. See Fletcher. 347. Boston, U.S.A., Public Library of, Bell, George, 81, 83. 233 ; Tea Riots in, 244. Bennet, John, marries Grace Murray, Botts, Samuel, Methodist preacher, 3ii. 227. 492 INDEX Bourke, Richard, Letter to, 223. I British Museum, London, 24, 165, 223, 469. Boyce, Mr., Oxford Methodist, Si- ' Broadmarston, 372. — - Mrs. See Miss S. Mallett. Brooke, Henry, Dublin, 183, 460. Boyle, Lord, on literary style, 436. Junior, Letter to, 460. Brackenbury, Robert Carr, 137; Brooks, Elizabeth, 308. Letters to, 167-173, 288. Brown, Christopher, help for, 308. Bradburn, Samuel, 138; Letters to, George, Methodist preacher, 165. 131. Bradford, Joseph, and the Isle of Buckingham, Duchess of, and genteel Man, 193. sinners, 34. Buckle, Henry T., on Wesley, 4. Wilts., Letter from, 231. Daniel, Methodist Yorks., 153 ; Letter from, Bumstead, preacher, 124. 344Bunker's Hill, Battle of, 247, 472. Brainerd, David, commended, 246. Bunyan, John, John Nelson and, Bray, Mr., of Little Britain, 98. 146. Brecon, Wales, Coke's birthplace, , Burgess, Joseph, Letter to, 228. 180. Bredin, John, Letter to, 454. 1 Burke, Edmund, 1 1 ; quoted, 157. Richard, 88. Bridlington, Wesley at, 10. ! Briggs, William, Wesley's first book Burlington, New Jersey, 282. steward, 317. Burrows, Mr., and E. Blackwell, Brisbane, Scotland, 402, 403. 292. Miss Darcy. See Maxwell, Burslem, 12 ; Wesley at, 372. Bushell, Elizabeth, a child convert, Lady. Bristol, Letters from, 58, 66, 70, 95, 452. 99, 127, 157, 167, 173, 175, 179, Butler, Bishop Joseph, quoted, 70, 160. 181, 186, 195, 198, 209, 213, 225, 228, 232, 263, 294, 295, 300, 312, Butterfield, Mr., of London, 314, 314, 323, 324, 331, 355, 375, 389, 316. 422, 432, 441, 447, 452, 478; Butts, Thomas, and the Methodist Letter to.Mayor and Corporation Book Room, 317. of, 417 ; a fair in, 38 ; Baldwin Byrom, J., poems of, 366, 367 ; Street Religious Society, 95, 98, shorthand system of, 74, 366. 101 ; Baptist Mills, 96, 101 ; Byron, James M., 200, 201, 202; Bowling Green, 9 7 ; 6 Dighton Letter to, 202. St., ordinations at, 262 ; Hanham CALAMY, EDMUND, Junior, and Mount, 26, 94, 97 ; Hope Chapel, 384 ; Hot Well, 79, 176, Wesley Nonconformity, 19. drinks waters at, 323, 402 ; Kings- Calm Address to our American wood, Colliers' schoolhouse at, 26, Colonies^ A, Wesley's, 247. see also Kings wood; Lawford's Calvinism, Wesley and, 19, 72, 418; Gate, 97; Newgate prison, work in, Methodism and, 102, 149, 157, 94, 95, 96, 97; New Room in 260, 261, 275. Horsefair, 26, 104, 181, described, Calvinistic (Presbyterian) Methodist Church in Wales, 103. 229, 314, 478, Blackwell and, 299; Portland Chapel, T. WTebb Cambridge Modern History', 11, 75, and, 241 ; Rose Green, 9 7 ; St. 3". Philip's Plain, 26 ; Weavers' Hall, University, Queen's College, 97, 99S. Furley at, 32, 421, 422, 447. British colonies, Wesley and the, Cambuslang, Scotland, 251. see America. Canada, Methodism in, 93, 237 493 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS et seq.; statistics of Methodists in, Jane Cooper and, 372; examples 237; the French in, 330; see also of, 404, 431. towns and leaders in loc. Christian's Pattern, The, see De ImiCanterbury, Wesley visits, 445. tatione Christi. Cardiff, 228 ; Wesley at, 234. Christie, James, Methodist preacher, Carey, William, 180, 227. Carlill, Thomas, Letter to, 227. Church, constitution of the Christian, 263; fellowship, Wesley's insistCarolina, U.S.A., 142; Whitefield ence upon, 271 ; membership, in, 242 ; North and South, 255. duty of, 115; discipline, 230, 231. Carrickfergus, Ireland, 343 ; Letter from, 346. of England, attitude towards Castlebar, Ireland, Letters from, 335, the, 76, 182, 262-264, 272 ; Metho400. dists and the, 232, 343, 462. Castleman, Dr., of Bristol, ordinaof Rome, attitude towards the, tions in house of, 262. 442. Cavenac, Mons., 346, 347. of Scotland, 383; Assembly of Cawley, Richard, of Alpraham, the, 397. Clanmain, Ireland, Letter from, 256. 151. Cennick, John, begins lay preach- Clark, Alexander, Letter to, 231. Clarke, Adam, 65; his Wesley Family, ing, 26, 72, 73 ; leaves Wesley, 103, 112, 138; and Rymer's Fcedera, 105. 174; his Bible Commentary, 174; Channel Islands, Methodists in, 169. Letters to, 175-179, 228, 365, Character of a Methodist, Wesley's, 120, 122. 453Charities, personal, 51, yy, 307; Mrs., 175, 176; Letter to, 177. Blackwell's distributed, 307. Clarkson, Thomas, and slavery, 489. Charlemount, Ireland, Letter from, Class-meetings, Methodist, 69, 94, 96, 369 ; tickets for, 198. 459. Clay, Sally, of London, illness of, Charles I., 17, 477. 221. Charlestown, U.S.A., 25. Charterhouse School, London, Wes- Clayton, J., Oxford Methodist, 52. Clayworth, Wesley and M. Fenwick ley at, 14, 23. at, 183. Chatham, Letter from, 164 ; 203. Clements, William, Fontenoy hero, Lord, 277, 481, 485. 468. Chaucer, D,, quoted, 86. Checks to Antinomianism, Fletcher's, Clergy and Methodists, 217, see also Church of England; studies for 144, 412. the, 424. Chester, Letters from, 132, 232, 283, Clones, Ireland, Letter from, 360. 319, 372, 454. Children, interest in, 420; at Lord s Coate, Mr., of North Shields, 206. Supper, 452; * Advice' concern- Cobham, Mr., of Carrickfergus, 346. Cocker, Jeremiah, of Sheffield, 230, ing, 148. 231. Chipman, Matilda, 64. Coke, Dr. Thomas, 127, 138 ; Letters Chippenham, Wilts., 312. to, 181, 263 ,• and missions, 180, Christian, a, defined, 62; a perfect, 199 ; appointed to America, 213 ; 121. ordained by Wesley, 262; stormy doctrine, safeguarding of, 275. voyage of, 272; Wesley's bioLibrary, plans for publication grapher, 356; marries Miss Loxof, 26, 303 ; recommended, 449. dale, 375 ; Life of, 272, 371. perfection, 19; Wesley on, 32; doctrine of, 83, 122 ; and sin, 159 ; Cokesbury College, 281, 282, the Methodist depositum, 173, 238 ; Colbeck,T., 186. 494 INDEX Colchester, 148, 201, 3 4 1 ; Letter 1 Cowbridge, Cardiff, 234. from, 187. Cownley, Joseph, Methodistpreacher, protests against unworthy clergy, Collection of Forms of Prayer, Wesy8; 124, 182. ley's, 25. of Hymns for the People called Cowper, William, and Letters, 32. Creighton, James, ordains Methodist Methodists (1780), 27, 80. Colman Collection of Wesley's Letpreachers, 127. ters, see Preface, xix et seq., xxxviii. Cromwell, Mr., in Nova Scotia, 268. Crook, John, Methodist preacher, Colne, Lanes., progress at, 166. * Come, O Thou Traveller unknown,' 19367. Crookshank, C. H., on a Wesley Commonwealth, English Church Letter, 458. under the, 17. Crosby, Sarah, 336, 339 ; and Conference, Methodist, 68, 76, 88 ; preaching, 361; Letters to, 362, constitution of, 90, 131 ; Wesley's 363rule in, 125, his Letter to, 132; Cross Hall, Leeds, Miss Bosanquet supremacy of, 130; of 1770, Deat, 358. claration at, 412; appoints preachers, Richard, of Bristol, 96. 416. Cumberland, and Wesley's debt Congleton, Cheshire, 372. effort, 152. Connaught, Wesley's tour in, 335. Cundy, Richard, Methodist preacher, Controversy, Wesley and, 35, 430, 233Cyprian, Wesley and 'advice' of, 434. Conventicles, defined, 100; Susanna Wesley and, 362. Conversation, serious view of, 139. DALE, Misses, 218, 402. Conversion, instances of radical, 59 ; Miss Molly, 220, 370. Wesley's evangelical, 61 ; instant Miss Peggy, Letter to, 370, or gradual, 393. 4°3Circuit, The, Barnard Cooke, Sophia, and Sunday Schools, Dales Castle, etc., 150, 164. 165. Coolylough, Ireland, animals and Dancey, Captain, Mrs. Wesley and, music at, 222. 336. Coombe, Henry, Mayor of Bristol, Daniel, John, St. Ives, 296. and mobs, 293. Darlington, Letters from, 193, 207. Cooper, Ezekiel, Letter to, 286. Darney, William, and mobs, 206, Jane, 371, 372, 390. 219. Mrs., of Bristol, 101. Dartmouth, Lord, Wesley's Letter Cope, General, and the Young Preto, 472. tender, 464. David, Christian, of Herrnhut, 68. Cork, Letters from, 156, 227, 402; Deaconesses, Methodist, 353, 361 et seq. 231, 376, 393Cornwall, tour in, 11, 78, 79; and Debt, personal, 45, 46, 85 ; on Methodist chapels, 151, 178; Nelson in, 296, 307; Methodism effort for, 218, 223, 300. in, 209; smuggling in, 484. De Courcey, Richard, 407, 408, 409, Costerdine, Robert, Letter to, 230. 410, 4 1 1 . Coughlan, Lawrence, Letter to, 238; Deed of Declaration (1784), the, 27, 265, 266. I3i» 132. m Countess of Huntingdon and her De Imitatione Christi, by A Kempis, Circle, Miss Sarah Tytler's, 118. 19,40,44, 209, 258, 4i5>46i. Cousins, Jonathan, Methodist Delamotte, Charles, Letter to, 480. preacher, 199. 495 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Dempster, James, 246, 248, 249, I 251; Letter to, 252. Derby, large class at, 361. De Renty, Marquis, 390, 405, 417. Dettingen, Battle of, 465. Dewal, Mrs., of London, and the Blackwells, 290, 295, 299, 300, | 3*4, 352. . I Dewsbury, trustees at, and appointment of preachers, 130, 131, 206. Dickens, John, and * Methodist Episcopal Church,' 262. Dickenson, Peard, 282. I Dillon, John, Methodist preacher, 88. Discipline, autocratic control of, 231. Dissent, the Wesleys and, 68, 70, 9 i , 133. Distilling liquor, Wesley and, 216, 483Dixon, Thomas, Methodist preacher, 187. Dodd, William (' Rusticulus ), in Newgate, 120-122. Dodson, Yorkshire family of, in Canada, 286. Dorset, traders of, and New England States, 85. Douglas, Colonel, and Mrs., 399. Dover, Fletcher at, 171 ; visit to, 445Dreams, narrated, 375. Drew Methodist Episcopal Theological Seminary, Madison, New Jersey, 138, 147, 166, 232, 281, 362, 37o. Dublin, Letters from, 176, 192, 197, 205, 2 1 1 , 268, 298, 300, 302, 309, 3*9> 33 2 , 347, 380, 415, 428, 431, 450, 452 ; Letter to Clark at, 231 ; Miss Ritchie in, 381 ; Methodists at, and Christian perfection, 409, 416. Dumfries, Letters from, 177, 181. Dunbar, debt at, 163. Dunn, Samuel, 216; and the Wesley Banner, 472. Durham, debt effort in, 152. Early Methodist Preachers, 146, 465. Easton, John, dull Methodist preacher, 183. 496 Edgar, John, help for, 308. Edinburgh, Letter from, 223; Lady Maxwell at, 350, see also Chapter x ; visit to, 371 ; St. Mary's Chapel in, 407 ; Young Pretender at, 464. Education, American Methodists and, 282. Edwards, Jonathan, 270. Eels, William, Methodist preacher, 206. Eighteenth century, central figure of the, 9, 24 ; conditions in, 98. Ejectment of 1662, the Wesleys and the, 17. of 1662 and the Free Churches, 12,70. Elections, interest in parliamentary, 33i,46i. Electricity, used, 80; recommended, 359Elizabeth, English Church under, 15, 16, 92. Ellis, William, Methodist preacher, 220. Ellison, Richard (brother-in-law), 3i5,3i6. Thomas (nephew), 483. Embury, Philip, of New York, 237, 238. Empringham, Robert, Methodist preacher, 192, 193. Enthusiasm of Methodists and Papists Compared, The, 191. Epworth, home at, 13, 25, 39, 315 ; Wesley family at, 48, 56; A. Kilham of, 169; Simon Kilham of, 227 ; Susanna Wesley's service at, 362 ; ' ghost' at, 404 ; Letters from, 229, 246, 316. Erasmus, a Greek bishop, 314. Errington, Matthew, Letter to, 220. Erse language, Duncan Wright and the, 147. Essay on the Human Understanding, Locke's, 449. Evangelical revival (eighteenth century), 7, 11, 19, 2 3 ; S. Wesley and, 48. Evans, David, Methodist preacher, 185. Elizabeth Tomlinson (' Dinah Morris'), 362. INDEX Evans, John, Fontenoy hero, 468. I Everett, J., viii, 102, 151, 216; diaries and memoranda of, 365; Collection of Wesley's Letters by, ix, x, 102, 151, 244, Miss Wesley's Letter in, 447 ; and Southey j on Wesley, 421. Everton, Letter from, 337. Evolution, theory of, anticipated, 448. Excise, Officer of, Letter to, 478. Experience, argument from, 58, 430; mystical, 415, 417. Fcedera, Rymer's, A. Clarke and, 174. Fontenoy, Methodist soldiers at, 465, 468. Fool of Quality, Brooked, 183, 460. Forbes, Mrs., of Cork, 376. Foster, H. J., on John Henderson, 422. Fox, Charles James, I I . George, Quaker, 22. Foy, Captain, of Bristol, and Methodist finance, 178, 300. France, war with, 257, 428, 462; invades Ireland, 342, 346. Franklin, Benjamin, discovers electricity, 80. Free, Dr., attacks Wesley, 36, 430. Freeman, Miss, 333, 342, 349. Friendships cultivated, 288, 426; with ladies, 353 et sea. Furley, Samuel, 32 ; Letters to, 422440. Faerie Queen, Spenser's, recommended, 449. Faith in Christ, instant result of, 387, 390, 393. Farley, F., of Bristol, Mrs. Wesley and, 330. Farningham, Marianne, quoted, 306. Fasting, 7, 8, 50, 52, 265; Oxford Methodists and, 52. Feeling, religious, 62, 386, 414. GALWAY, Letter from, 449. Female preachers, Methodist, 358, Garnet, C , Methodist preacher, 186. 360, 361, 363. Joseph, Methodist preacher, 186. Fenelon, Archbishop of Cambray, Dr. Richard, and a Wesley 254, 453Fenwick, John, Methodist preacher, Letter, 31. 152, 197. Garrettson, Freeborn, 267, 2 6 8 ; - — Michael, 78; at Clayworth, Life of, 267, 268; and his slaves, 183 ; summed up, 220, 229, 329. 489; Letters to, 268, 269, 271, Festivals and Fasts, R. Nelson's, 274, 280. Garth, Brecon, Mrs. Charles Wesley 102. Finance, Methodist system of, 178, and, 305. 300. See also Debt. G itch, Philip, and his slaves, 489. George 11 ,331; proposed Address to, Fish, Mr (Moravian), 98, 227. 463 ; in the robe chamber, 469. Fisher, John, Methodist preacher, George i n . , 344; and C. Wesley, 79Junior, 440. Fitzgerald, Edward, on Wesley's George IV. and C. Wesley, Junior, style, 434. 440. Fletcher, John W., 138; invited to be Wesley's successor, 141, 144; Georgia, U.S.A., as missionary in, on church polity, 145; resigns I 25, 57, 127, 180, 237 ; illness and love affair in, 310; C. Delamotte Trevecca principalship, 157 ; and in, 479. Voltaire, 479 ; see also Checks to Antinomianism ; Letters to, 139, Gibson, Dr., Bishop of London, 124. Gillies, Mr., and Wesley's Scotch 145 ; Wesley's Life of, 171. route, 150. Mrs. J., Letters to, 358; saintGilbert, Nathaniel, of Antigua, 180; liness of, 415; Life of, 358. * first American Methodist,' 237, Fleury, Abb£, 107, 452. I 273. Floyde, John, 191, 192. 2l 497 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Glasgow, Letters from, 181, 371, 397. Glenorchy, Lady, 384, 407, 411, 418. Gloucester, Letter from, 276. Gnomon of the New Testament, Bengel's, and Wesley's Notes on New Testament, 323. Gordon, D., Letter to, 230. Lord George, 481. Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners, Bunyan's, 146. Great English Letter Writers, Dawson's, 30, 31. Greek, Susanna Wesley and, 14; Bishop Warburton and, 82 ; as a text for clergymen, 128 ; Notes on New Testament and, 323. Green, John Richard, 1 1 ; connects abolition of slavery with Methodism, 489. Greenfield, Edward, and Christian assurance, 296. Grevil, Mrs., Whitefield's sister, 94, 96, 293. Grimsby, James Christie at, 227. Grimshaw, William, of Haworth, 138, 345. Guernsey, Brackenbury and Kilham in, 169, 175; missionaries for, 181 ; John Bredin in, 453. Guidance, divine, in human life, 280. Guyon, Madam, 358, 415, 453. Gwynne, Miss Sarah. See Wesley, Mrs. C. HAIME, JOHN, soldier hero and preacher, 148, 465, 468. Halifax, Canada, 260, 272, 273, 274. Hall, James, neglectful Methodist preacher, 211, 234. Rev. Westley (brother-in-law), 73, 263, 300. Mrs., Letters to, 65. See also Wesley, M. Hampson, John, Junior, 5 ; on Wesley's * hilarity,' 426. — Senior, Methodistpreacher, 362. Hanby, Thomas, 208. 498 I Hanham, Bristol, open-air preaching at, 94, 97. Hare, Suky, befriended, *]*]. Harper, Joseph, Methodist preacher, 212, 364. Hart, Richard, of Bristol, 118, 119. I Hartlepool, Letter from, 398. Haverfordwest, Letter from, 234. Haworth, Yorks., visit to, 138, 326, 345Heart of Asbury*s Journal, The, Principal Tipple's, 243. Heath, Rev. Mr., of Burlington, New Jersey, 281; family of, 282 ; Letter to, 282. Heck, Barbara, in New York, 237. Helton, John, Methodist preacher, 124; 189. Henderson, John, of Hanham, 422. Richard, of Wiltshire, 226. Herrnhut, Germany, 2 6 ; Letter from, 69. Hervey, William, S. Wesley, Junior, and, 64. Hesketh, Lady, Cowper and, 32. Heslop, John, Methodist preacher, 152. High Wycombe, Letter from, 369. Hill, Sir Richard, and Calvinism, 149. Hindemarsh, James, Methodist preacher, 222. History of America, Robertson's, 449. of England in the Eighteenth Century, Lecky's, 133. of Methodism, Hurst's, Rev. T. E. Bridgen's vols, of, 123, 241. G. Smith's, 472. A New, ix, xii, xxxix, etc.; Rev. T. E. Brigden and, 9 ; Dr. W. J. Townsend and, 4 7 8 ; Dr. H. B. Workman and, 135. of New England, Neal's, 449. of the Puritans, Neal's, 449. of the Reformation, Burnet's, 449Hoadley, Bishop, 18, 43. Hobson, Elizabeth, ghost story of, 403> 405Holder, George, Methodist preacher, 148. INDEX Holland, William, at Aldersgate Hymns on Gods Kverlasting Love, C. Wesley's, 73. Street, London, Society, 61. 'namby-pambical,' 80. visit to, 27, 169, 171. Holt (? Norfolk), Morgan's illness at, INDIA, T. Coke and, 180. SiHoly Living and Dying, Taylor's, Individuals, appeals to, 36, 38, 42. Inquiry into the Primitive Church, 19, 41. Wesley reads, 263. Hope, Lady Henrietta, 384. International Library of Famous Hopkey, Miss Sophia Christiana, of Literature, 31. Georgia, 39, 166, 310. Hopkins and Sternhold's hymns, Inverness, Letters from, 261, 409. Ireland, James, of Bristol, 171, 479. 114. 26; illness in, 27 ; Methodists Hopper, Christopher, 124, 138; wife and sacraments in, 76 ; revivals in, of, 133 ; Letters to, 149-151. 82, 142, 270, 285 ; Methodists in, Horseback-riding, Wesley and, 7, 79, 123, 308; disease in, 153; A. 173, 323. Clarke in, 176; Coke in, 181; Hoskins, John, of Old Perlican, 129, Wride in, 189; chapels in, 218, 259. 228; and American Methodism, Houlton, Zechariah (Zac. sic in text), 237; tours in, 298, 308, 317, 322, Methodist preacher, 199, 200. first, 26, last, 206; special Letters House of Commons, order of, on to friends in, 455, 459. clergy, 17 ; Bible cited in, 482. of Lords, visit to, 469; orders Isle of Man, Methodism in, 193, 285. —-- Wight, revival, 285. silver return, 478. Howard, John, prison reformer, 23, Itinerant ministry, Wesley and the, 162, 416. 488. Huddersfield, Gospel ministry in, 344, Itinerary, An, in which are traced the Rev. John Wesley's Journeys, 225. 434Hughes, Hugh Price, and individual Itinerations, Wesley's, 6,11, 185. appeal, 41. Mrs., of Bath, 421. JACKSON, EDWARD, Methodist Hull, 10, 165; Letter from, 133. preacher, 164. Humphreys, Joseph, 73, 7 5 ; Letter Jaco, Peter, Methodist preacher, 124. Jersey, Brackenbury and Kilham in, to, 221. Hunter, William, Methodist preacher, !69, 175; missionaries for, 181, 191. 285 ; Breden in, 453. Huntingdon, Selina, Countess of, 'Jesu, Lover of my soul,' 67. 34, 76, %%; her Connexion, 103 ; Johnson, John, Methodist preacher, 'Pope Joan/ 118; Letter to, 1.19; 188. and J. Nelson, 147 ; and S. Furley, Dr. S., 20, 24; on Letters, 3 1 ; 421 ; Life of, 118, 418; 154, 157, and Wesley, 38 ; his Calm Address 231, 326, 412. to America, 247; on friendship, Husk, General, 464; Letter to, 466. 288 ; and ghost story, 404. Hutton, James, of London (Moravian), Jones, Dr. John, 76, 314. Letters to, 93, 95, 99, 102. Lucy, relief for, 308. Hymns by the Wesleys, 67. See also Junius, Letters of, offers to answer, separate titles, and Wesley, Charles; 33Juvenal, Satires of, 27, 143. Wesley, John. for Times "of Trouble and Persecution, C. Wesley's, 469. KEIGHLEY, Letter from, 327; —•— of Methodism in their Literary Letter to Methodists at, 235. Relations, Rev. H. Bett's, 239. I Ken, Bishop, 18. 499 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Kenagh, Ireland, 453. I Law, William, 19, 25, 61, 78, 370. Kershaw, Arthur, Methodist preacher, See also Serious Call and A 189. Practical Treatise. James, Methodist preacher, 197. Lawrence, Brother (Nicholas HerKeswick, visit to, 186, 334. mann), 415, 416. Kidderminster, 112, 281. | Lay preaching, Wesley and, 7 2 ; Kilham, Alexander, with Bracken- | beginning of, 221. See also bury, 169; Wesley calls out to | Methodist preachers. preach, 227. I Leatherhead, Wesley's last sermon Simon, of Epworth, 227. at, 27. Kilkenny, 223 ; Letter from, 393. Lecky, W. E. H . , on Wesley, 4, 11, Kilsythe, Scotland, revival at, 251. 60, 133. King, John, American preacher, 246, Leeds, Letters from, 149, 313 ; Con252 ; Letter to, 253. I ferences at, 76, 252, 359, 432 ; increase at, 299, 301 ; * Female King, Lord, his Account of the PrimiBrethren' at, 361 ; 176, 177, 182, tive Church, 263. King's Lynn, Letter from, 195 ; 363. 32I> 327Kingswood, Bristol, 94, 97, 103, Leeward Islands, missionaries for, 470; Letters from, 198, 305, 427 ; 181. Wesley's school at, 44, 85, 94, 97, Lefevre, Mrs., Wesley writes to, 105, 122, 124, 132, 156, 303, and 330C. Bayley, 225, and W. Black, Leger, Dr. Augustin, on Wesley's 260, and Lady Maxwell's help, 383, conversion, 41. and 'play,' 421, curriculum of, Leinster, tour in, 335. 422, 423, conversions at, 452; Leslie, Rev. Dr., 458; Letter to, Colliers' chapel at, 26, and Cennick, 45972, 103, Whitefieldand, 105, Black- Letter to a Friend Concerning Tea, well helps, 291. Wesley's, 31. Kippax, Leeds, S. Furley at, 429. Letters, great, 30, 31, 33 ; Wesley's, Kirkham, Miss B., ' a religious as Letters, 31-38; collections of friend,' 25, 41, 44 ; (? * Varenese,' Wesley's, x, xxxviii; completely given here, viii, 44, 118 ; of * the 3io)wounded,' Sir W. R. Nicoll on, Lionel, of Stanton, 310. R., Oxford Methodist, 51. I 328. Knaresborough, Yorks., 361. of Oliver Cromwell, Carlyle's, Knight, Dr., on ' A Christian,' 54. x. Knox, Alexander, of Dublin, 32 ; on to his Son, Chesterfield's, 420. Wesley's female friendships, 353 ; Levick, Samuel, 124. on Wesley in old age, 377, 455. Lewen, Miss Margaret, of NewcastleJames, Letter to, 455. on-Tyne, legacy from, 65, 66 ; carriage and horses from, 349, 370, LACKINGTON, Mr., London book402. seller, 307. Lewisham, Letters from, 86, 144, Lady friends, Wesley's, see chap, ix, 242 ; resting-place at Blackwell's 374; Mrs. Lefevre, 330; Lady at, 289, 323, 341, 347; ' T h e Maxwell, 382. Limes' at, described, 352. Lancashire, tour in, 168 ; revival in, Leytonstone, Essex, Miss Bosanquet 261. at, 146, 358. Lancaster, John, Sarah Peters and, Liberty, Christian, 53. Liden, Professor, Wesley's report to, 23Lavington, Bishop, controversy with, 123. 37, 124, 191. I Life and Errors of John Dunton, 13. 500 INDEX 35o, 355 5 L i t t l e Britain, 9 8 ; L o n d o n Bridge, Wesley slips on, 311 ; Marylebone, C. Wesley's house at, 4 4 0 ; Methodists of, 72, 81 ; Wesley in St. Paul's Cathedral, 61 ; N e w g a t e prison, Methodist work in, 22, 2 3 , D o d d in, 121 ; Linnell, William, M e t h o d i s t p r e a c h e r , Tower of, 470, 481 ; W a n d s w o r t h , 186. I 3 1 0 ; W e s t Street Chapel, 6 5 , Literature, contributions to, 7, 4 3 4 ; 112, 123, 3 4 6 ; Westminster Abbey circulation of, 209. memorial, 6 7 ; Whitefriars, 182. Methodism and, 245. See also Lewisham. Liturgy, Wesley prepares, 264. L o n d o n d e r r y , Letters from, 360, 3 9 1 , Liverpool, Letters from, 214, 349, 407. 370, 4 3 6 ; 228, 232, 326, 333, 366, L o n g t o w n (PLongton, Staffs.), 185. Lopez, Gregory, 390. 372, 454Lloyd, Mr., and Mrs. Wesley, 312, L o r d ' s Supper. See Sacraments. Lothian, Marchioness of, 382. 313Lloyds Evening Post, L e t t e r t o , 78, L o u g h N e a g h , 342, 343. 121. Love, Wesley on St. Paul's h y m n Llyngwair, W a l e s , Letter from, 4 4 3 . of, 371. Loan fund, for deserving tradesmen, Lowestoft, Letter from, 199, 271. 307. L o w t h , Bishop, of L o n d o n , L e t t e r L o c k e , J o h n , on authority, 5 2 ; his t o , 127 ; 259, 448. Essay on Human Understanding, L o w t h e r , Sir J a m e s , 309. 449. L o x d a l e , Miss, Letter to, 372. Logic, Isaac W a t t s ' s , recommended, Lucas, M r . E . V . , on letter writers, 448. 31. London, Bishop of, 238, 259, 264. L u n e l l , William, of Dublin, 298, Letters from, 6 1 , 7 3 , 75, 299. 77, 80, 82, 85, 89, 104, 121, 125, L u t h e r , Martin, a n d son Hansichen, 130, 131, 141, 146, 148, 152, 160, 37 ; his Preface to R o m a n s , 61 ; 162, 163, 165, 166, 169, 171, 172, t e a c h i n g of, and Wesley, 6 0 ; at 175, 185, 188, 189, 191, 192, 196, W o r m s , 69, 1 8 0 ; on revivals, 379 ; 199, 200, 201, 203, 210, 2 1 1 , 212, or Bellarmine, 444. 213, 214, 215, 217, 218, 2 1 9 / 2 2 0 , 2 2 1 , 224, 228, 233, 235, 245, 248, M A C A U L A Y , Lord, on Wesley, 4. 253, 254, 259, 260, 265, 266, 269, Macclesfield, L e t t e r from, 274 ; 232, 270, 273, 277, 279, 280, 284, 285, 372, 373, 374291* 307, 359, 362, 363, 366, 368, M a d a n , Martin, 82, Z^>, 337. 379, 387, 395, 405, 408, 409, 4 1 1 , M a d d e r n , J o h n , 348. 412, 417, 418, 424, 425, 427, 429, Madeley, Shropshire, 1 3 8 ; and J o h n 455, 463, 479, .480, 481, 4 8 9 ; S. Fletcher, 141, 145. Wesley curate in, 1 3 ; Aldersgate Madison, N e w Jersey, U . S . A . , D r e w Street, Wesley at, 4, 26, 60, 6 1 ; Theological Seminary at, xi, 138, Blackheath, 291; City R o a d 147, 232. C h a p e l , 40, 112, 165, 173, 290, Mallett, Miss S., Letter t o , 364. 373, 413, Wesley's death at house Manchester, L e t t e r s from, 116, 164, of, 27, 373, 3 7 8 ; Fetter L a n e 312, 325, 3 4 1 , 386 ; Wesley in, 149, Moravian Chapel, 26, 73, 93, 95, 168, 372, 393, 420, 434, 4 5 4 ; 99, 4 7 2 ; Foundery, the (London O l d h a m Street C h a p e l , 225 ; St, centre), 26, 72, 112, 123, 298, 325, J a m e s ' s C h u r c h , 225. Life and Letters of Thomas Pelham I Dale, 370. —— of Rev. R. Chew, Boaden's, ix. Limerick, 192, 266, 309, 336, 455, 458. Lincoln, President, as letter-writer, JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Mann, John, Letter to, 277. persecution of early, 21, 373, Manners, John, 149, 150, 253. 486. Mansfield, Lord, 24 ; on Methodist Methodist, a, defined, 120. See also ordinations, 90. 'Oxford Methodists.' Marazion, Cornwall, prosperity at, Conference, authority and con210. stitution of, 26, 119, 126, 1 3 1 ; Marchant, Richard, of Bath, 99, Letter to, 132. 100. Episcopal Church, Wesley's Marlborough, Letters from, 331, 470. Letter authorises, 262. Marriott, Thomas, and Wesley's Free Church Hymns, 167. Letters, 311. New Connexion, 169. Marshall, Mr., London Moravian, preachers, Letters to chief, 13782; Letters to rank and file of, 74183-236 ; control of, 185 ; discipline Maryborough, Letter from, 194. of, 189, 19T, 196; care for, 235, Maryland, Methodism in, 142, 237. 273; list of 'best,' 124, see also Mason, John, Methodist preacher, Preacher; money allowance to, 186. I 9°» I93> 223 > qualifications of, Massachusetts, John White and, 85. 129; orders to, 148; training of, Mather, Alexander, a * best'preacher, 137, 154; in America, 281. 124. Lives of Early, 146, 465. Matthews, William, 350. Maxfield, Thomas, and lay preaching, Militant Methodism, quoted, 245. Millennium, Wesley and the, 153, 433. 72, 74, 81, 8 2 ; and Wesley's Miller, Elizabeth, recommended to teaching, 239. Blackwell, 307. Maxwell, Lady, Letters to, 382-418; courtesy to, 35 ; signatures on Minethorp, William, of York, 219. Letters to, y], 40 ; and Lady Missionary enterprise, Methodist, 180. Huntingdon, 118; Wesley's wife See also Methodist. with, 350, 353, 361 ; Life of, 382. Money, love of, denounced, 268, 270. Sir Walter, 382. See also Wesley, charities of. Mazzini, Giuseppe, call of to helpers, Montagu, Lady Mary, 36. and Wesley's, 137. Moore, Henry, 182, 233, 358; his M'Geary, John, Canadian preacher, Life of Wesley, 181, 356, 425. 214, 273, 276. Moravians, Letters to, xi, xxxviii, 95, M'Kersey, J., Letter to, 200, 202. 99 ; 25, 33, 63 ; influence of, on M'Nab, Alexander, 124; expulsion Methodism, 6 8 ; separation from, of, 125, 126; 131, 187, 409. 72, 73Medical work, Wesley's, 294, 453. Moreland, Mrs., of Dublin, 332. Memorial, Atmore's, 238. Morgan, James, Methodist preacher, Merit on, John, Methodist preacher, 124. Jeremy, of London, 221. 305. William, Oxford Methodist, 51. Metaphysics, Hutcheson's, 426, 428. Methodism in Canada, Sutherland's, Morning Post and scandals on Wesley, 445238, 259. ' Morris, Dinah.' See Evans, E. T. and Calvinism, 408, 415. Mortimer, Harvey W., marries E. and Methodists, Letters on, 93Ritchie, 377136; rules for, 90; summary of Murlin, John, Methodist preacher, statistics of, 93, 123, 218; Ameri165. can and Canadian, 237 ; Wesley's Murray, Grace, Wesley and, 310. government of, 125 ; unity of, emJohn, and T. Wride, 187, phasised, 286 ; Irish and American, 188, 298; Lady Maxwell and, 389; 502 INDEX Music, Wesley and, 88, 202, 222, 1New York, first Methodist chapel in, 440. 124, 142, 261 ; work begun in, 237; Myles, William, quoted, 190. 242, 245, 261. Mystics, The, and Mysticism, 21, 33, Night Thoughts, Young's, C. Wesley 78. See also Behmen, J. and a book on, recommended, 449. Nonconformists, Methodists and, 21, NAMES, pet, used by Wesley, 35; 68, 70, 91, 133. care in choosing, 175. Nonjurors, the, described, 18. Napoleon, Buonaparte, 35, 137, 227, Norfolk, S. Mallett in, 364. 2 x Duchess of, and C. Wesley's son 3 Samuel, 442. Nash, Beau, of Bath, 98, 100. Norman, Mrs., of Bristol, 96. Nativity Hymns; C. Wesley's, 81. Natural phenomena, Wesley and, 38, Norris, John, of Bemerton, 427, 429. 222. Nature and Design of Christianity', Northampton, Wesley rides to, 21. North, Lord, Letter to, 472, 473; The, W. Law's, 424. interview with, 247; andT. Webb's Necessitarians in eighteenth century, pension, 484. 21. Shields, Wesley loses preachNelson, John, Letter to, 147 ; and ing-house at, 206. Dissent, 68 ; 146, 149, 235; with Northumberland, Wesley in, 1 1 ; debt Wesley in Cornwall, 296. effort in, 152. Robert, Nonjuror, 102. Newark, Methodists of, and Church Northwich, collector at, and a Methodist preacher, 342. of England, 214. New Brunswick, W. Black and, Norton, Nicholas, dispute with, 431. Norwich, 22 ; Letters from, 150, 226, 259Newburyport, Mass., Whitefield and, ! 230, 240, 345, 399; troubles with singers at, 197, 200-202. 241. Newcastle-on-Tyne, 85, 89; Letters Notes on the New Testament, Wesley's, 27, 77, 245, 323, 326. from, 65, 119, 153, 303, 317, 376, 396, 414, 465 ; Letters to Mayor Nottingham, Wride and, 215; Corporation of, and a theatre, 471. of, 465, 467; to General Husk in siege of, 464, 466 ; work begun at, Nova Scotia, mission to, 181; Black and, 259, 265, 267; Garrettson 26 ; missionary collection at, 180 ; and, 268, 273, 274, 277. Wesley's northern centre, 150, 216, 317; his illness at, 310; his wife I Nowers, Mr., a Moravian, 73, 74. at > 356, 402; his accident near, 420, 421 ; Miss M. Lewen of, 370; ODDIE, JAMES, 151; Letters to, 218, 219, 220 ; 346. Orphan House at, 220, 310, 402, Old age, described, 285, 455; Wes464 ; soldiers on moor at, 465. ley in, 377. New England, 180, 475; revival in, Oldham, children of, greet Wesley, 270. See also Chapter vii. 421. Newfoundland, mission to, 181 ; Coughlan in, 238; W. Black, Old Perlican, Newfoundland, 259. superintendent of, 259, 265, 266, Old Testament in Life and Litera267, 273. ture, Miss A. M. Stoddart's, xii. Newport-Pagnell, adventure near, 20. Olivers, Thomas, and Wesley's charities, 65, 124; defends MethoNewry, Ireland, Letter from, 186; dist teaching, 149, 150, 151. 342. . . New Testament, Christianity of, 69 ; Ontologia, Clerc's, 426. Bishop Warburton and, 82 ; and Ordination of Methodist preachers, I 90, 127, 208; for America, 262. principles of church polity, 125. 503 JOHN WESLE:ys Original Letters by the Rev. John Wesley, Priestley's, 33. Orleans, D u k e of, and Voltaire, 480. Orphanages, Methodist, 124, 3 1 1 , 359> 3 8 3 , 415, 464. Osmotherly, Yorkshire, 9. Otley, Y o r k s , 9 ; Letter from, 187, 377Otterburn, William Phillip, ordains Asbury, 279. Ouseley, Gideon, Irish preacher, 298. Oxford, Letters from, 40, 42, 44, 52, 53, 56, 1 9 4 ; Wesley at University of, i5> 2 5 , 3 3 , 42, 5 1 , 56, i S 4 ; C. Wesley's great sermon at, 6 7 ; Benson and, 156 ; Whitefield at, 102 ; Bodleian Library at, 15, 222; Chiist Church, 14, 25, 5 0 ; E x e t e r College, 13 ; Lincoln College, Wesley Fellow of, 15, 25, 5 1 , 311 ; Pemb r o k e College, 75, 422 ; St. Mary's Church, Wesley in, 42, 4 3 , 52. ' O x f o r d M e t h o d i s t s , ' 4 9 , 50, 5 1 , 52, 67, 69, 75P A N O U , Mrs., of Bristol, 96. j Papists and Church of E n g l a n d , 9 1 , 92, 96, 277. Paradise Lost, Milton's, recomm e n d e d , 449. P a r d o n , M r . , L o n d o n , indebtedness to, 85. Parents, deference to, 40, 48, 224. Parliament, Bible cited in, 482 ; Acts of, see Act. Pawson, J o h n , 124 ; destroys Wesley's Shakespeare, 468. Pearson, Bishop, on the Creed, recommended, 449. Pennsylvania, Methodism in, 1 4 2 ; unity of Colonists in, 475. * Penny a week ' contributions, 300. P e n r y n , Letter from, 113. Pensford, faithful Methodists at, 101. Perronet, Charles, and the Methodists, 76, 77, 326, 3 3 0 , 4 1 7 , 4 3 3 . E d w a r d , 76, 3 1 0 ; travels with Wesley, 307, 310. Vincent, 76 ; ' Archbishop of M e t h o d i s t s , ' 138, 307. 504 LETTERS Persecution of Wesley a n d Methodists, 2 1 , 132, 135, 293, 296, 317. Peters, Sarah, works in Newgate prison, 23. Philadelphia, Methodists in, 1 2 4 ; W e b b in, 2 4 1 , 2 4 2 ; R a n k i n in, 244 ; conference in, 246 ; a centre, 279 ; news from, 475. Philip II., Wesley's example of autocracy of, 475, 477. Pilgrim F a t h e r s , Wesley's ancestor and the, 85. Pilgrim's Progress^ Bunyan's, 146. Pill, Bristol, Asbury embarks from, .243Pilmoor, J o s e p h , volunteers for America, 241, 245 ; Journal of, 241. Pine, William, of Bristol, 274. Pitt, William, 4, 15 ; Letter to, 483 ; a n d Wesley compaied, 4, 24, 1 5 0 ; and W e b b ' s pension, 241, 4 8 3 ; and persecution of Methodists, 486 ; and Wilberforce, 489. Pius v i . thanks S. Wesley (nephew), 442. Plain Account of Christian Perfection, A, Wesley's, 8 3 , 3 7 1 , 372, 375P l y m o u t h D o c k , Letters from, 78, 90 ; debt paid at, 178. Poetical Works of John and Charles Wesley, 290. Politics, interest in, 4 6 1 , 469. See also Public men. Pope, Alexander, quoted, 437. ' Pope John and Pope Joan,' 118. Portarlington, Letter from, 249. Potter, D r . , Bishop of Oxford, ordains W e s l e y , 15, 25 ; Archbishop of Canterbury, 15, 100. Practical Treatise on Christian Perfection, L a w ' s , 424. Prayer, constant use of, 8 ; enjoined, 306, Preacher, Wesley as, first sermon by, 25, 95-100 ; criticism of Coke as, 181. See alio Methodist preachers. Presbyterians, 1 7 ; in Bristol a n d Wesley's work, 94, 96 ; and Socinians, 2 7 5 ; L a d y Maxwell a n d , 407. INDEX Presbyters and bishops of one order, I 263. Preservative against Unsettled Notions in Religion, Wesley's, 261. Pretender, the, to English Crown, | 68, 462, 464. Price, Peter, at Kingswood School, 154. Priestdown, near Bristol, visited, 101. Revivals, religious, 379; regulating, 179, 276. Revolution of 1688, 14. Richard Baxter and the Revival of Preaching and Pastoral Service, Eayrs's, 17. Richelieu and Wesley compared, 4. Ridel, James, 165, 166. Ridley, Alderman, of Newcastle-onTyne, Letters to, 465, 467. Rigg, Dr. J. H., on Wesley's sympathy, 420. Ritchie, Dr., of Otley, 377. Miss Elizabeth, Letters to, 378, 379, 380 ; 9, 372, 375 5 account °f> 377 * at Wesley's deathbed, 378; experience of, 416; Life {Memoirs of E. Mortimer), 377. Roberts, Thomas, Letter to, 234. Roche, Cornwall, S. Furley at, Priestley, Joseph, and Wesley's Letters, 33. Primitive Physic, Wesley's, 79, 209, 210, 294, 453, 461. Prior, M., the Wesleys and, 238; his Solomon, 238, 437. Prisons, Methodist work in, 22, 23, 94, 95. 96, 97, 121. Proud, Mr., of Norwich, 199. Public worship, Methodist, 112. 421. matters and men, Wesley's interest in, 461 ; Letters on and Roe, Miss H. A. See Rogers, Mrs. Rogers, James, 209; at Wesley's to, Chapter xii, 469. Publisher, Wesley as a, 7, 26S, 274, deathbed, 373. Mrs. Hester Ann, Letters to, 303373, 374-376 ; and Wesley's death, Publishing houses, Methodist, 244, 378,416. 317. Romaine, William, 88. Romans, St. Paul's Epistle to, QUEBEC, missionaries for, 181. Wesley hears Luther's preface to, Queteville, John de, 175. 61 ; expounds, 96. RAIKES, ROBERT, and Sunday Rome, Church of, 12, 15, 1 7 ; schools, 165. Wesley on adherence to the, 443, Rankin, Thomas, Letters to, 245, 469. 246, 248, 249, 250, 253, 254, 255, Roosevelt, President, on Wesley and Methodism, 237. 257 ; appointed to America, 243; and Asbury, 247, 250, 251; returns Roquet, James, of Kingswood School, to England, 258. 155Reading of books, on horseback, 7 ; Rosanna, Wicklow, Letter from, how much, 163; courses of, see 282. Study. Roubiliac, L. F., his bust of Wesley, Redruth, Letters from, 226, 328, Frontispiece. 404. Rousseau, J. J., and Voltaire, 479. Redwick, Bristol, 234. j Rowell, Jacob, 124, 149, 150, 152. Reflections upon the Conduct of Royalty, Wesley and> 469. See also Human Life> John Norris's, 427. George I., 11., ill. Rehoboam, autocracy of, Wesley Rule, life under, 53 ; Wesley's, * Do cites, 475, 477. all the good,' etc., 423. Reliquice Baxteriance, 17. See also Ryan, Sarah, of Bristol, Mrs. Wesley Baxter, R. and, 334, 337 j E. Blackwell and, Remonstrant theology of Arminius, 339I Rylands, Dr., and missions, 180. 144. 505 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Rylands, John, Library, Manchester, I Sect that Moved tht World, A, Rev. J. Telford's, 489. xi, 153, 227, 232, 453. Rymer's Fozdera, A. Clarke and, 174. Seed, Richard, Methodist preacher, 186. SACRAMENTS, the, C. Wesley and, Sellon, Walter, Letters to, 278, 68 ; Methodists and, 76; difficulties 455as to giving, 112, 229, 230; pro- Serious Call, A, to a Devout and vision for, 229 ; in America, 264 ; Holy Life, Law's, 19, 25, 61,78, children and, 452. 37o, 378. St. Ives, Letters from, 211, 297, Considerations on Absolute Predestination, Barclay's, 73. 329. St. James, Epistle of, quoted, 171, Seward, William, Methodist martyr, 102, 2 2 1 , 222, 2 9 1 , 292. 397. St. John, Gospel of, 95 ; First Epistle Shadford, George, Letter to, 244, 245, 246 ; Dr. J. M. Buckley on of, quoted, 34; Wesley expounds, Wesley's Letter to, 243. 97 ; his model of style, 435. Shakespeare, William, comparison St. Neots, Letter from, 130. with, 4 ; marked copy of works of, St. Paul, 31, 3 4 ; Letters of, and these, 36; his character and | 469 ; quoted, 183, 331, 378, 468. Wesley's, 37, 328, 384, 413, 458 ; Sheen, R., reprints C. Wesley's hymns, 80, 81. and Wesley's conversion and teaching, 60, 61 ; Nelson and, 146; Sheffield, Letter from, 186, 295; 224; United Methodist Theological Garrettson and, 267, 274 ; Asbury College at, 479. and, 274; and female preachers, Shelburn, Nova Scotia, 272, 274. 360; and children, 420. St. Paul: A Study in Social and Re- Shelburne, Lord, Letter to, 481. ligious History, Prof. Deissmann's, I Shent, William, a plea for, 33, 234, 235, 273. 37Shepton Mallett, visit to, 79. St. Peter on the Millennium, 433. St. Theresa, and Mrs. M. Fletcher, Sherlock, Dr., and Dr. South, 433. Shirley, Walter, and J. Fletcher, 358. 413Salisbury, visit to, 226, 300. Shoreham, Kent, Letters from, 155, Sancroft, Archbishop, 18. 170, 188; 76, 138, 310. Sanctification. See Christian per- Shorthand, Wesley wrote, 366. fection. Short Hymns on Select Passages of Saunderson, Ezekiel, 188, 361. Holy Savannah, U.S.A., as missionary in, Shovel, Scripture, C. Wesley's, 83. Sir 25, 127, 166; Miss S. C. Hopkey Shrewsbury,Cloudesley, 436. 372. Letter from, 371, in, 40. See also Georgia. Sidare, Sayings, Wesley's. See Wesley, Sin, in Letter from, 206. believers, teaching on, 159, sayings of. 161. Scarborough, 9, 194. Scotland, 27, 142,- preachers ordained Singing, personal use of, 8 ; in Methodist services, 114, 200, 202. for, 90, 208; missionaries for the Highlands of, 147, 181 ; character Slaithwaite, Yorks., S. Furley at, 421, 433 ; Wesley at, 434. of religion in, 395, 411. Scurr, Mr., Yorkshire, Methodist in Slavery, Wesley and, 267, 4 8 8 ; Methodists and, 489. Nova Scotia, 266, 286. Search after Truth, Malebranche's, Sleep, Christian liberty and, 5 4 ; early rising and, 423, 444, 445. 154, 426, 449. Seccombe (or Seacombe), Thomas, Sligo, J. Knox and Wesley at, 343, i 455' Methodist preacher, 79. 506 INDEX Smith, John, Methodist preacher, I Stourport, Heath met at, 281. Strawbridge, Robert, Methodist 187. > —— William, of Newcastle-on-Tyne, pioneer, 237. married Miss Jane Vazeille, 356; Stretton, John, Letter to, 266 ; 273, Wesley stays with, 420. 284. Smythe, Edward, 91, 125 ; attacks Stuart dynasty, English Church under of, in Dublin, 176, 182, 225, the, 17, 18. Social questions, interest in, 23, 471, Study, courses of scholastic and literary, 154, 155, 425, 447. 477, 483Society for Propagating Christian Style, literary, Letters on, 434-440; Knowledge in Foreign Parts, 127. Rev. J. Telford on Wesley's forma—L- for the Propagation of the tion of, 435. Gospel, the, 238. Suffolk, S. Mallett in, 364. of Friends, 21 ; and Wesley's Suicide, on crime of, 483. work, 97. Sunday, observance of, 113, 227, Socinians, Wesley's view of, 106, 481. Schools, Methodists and, 165, 275Soldiers, preaching to, 465 ; offers to 383raise regiment of, 257, 330, 469 ; | Sunderland, Letters from, 285, 350; Methodist, 148, 465; Sunday 403drilling of, 481. Survey of the Wisdom of God in the Solemn League and Covenant, The, Creation, by Buddseus, edited, 448. 18. Sutherland, Alexander, his MethodSomersetshire, persecution of ism in Canada, 238, 259. Methodists in, 486, 487. Swedenborg, Emmanuel, teachings South, Dr., a story of, 434, 437. of, 2 1 , 380. Leigh, near Witney, Wesley's Swift, Jonathan, Letters of, 420; first sermon at, 25. style of, 437, 439. Petherton, T. Coke curate at, 180. TANDERAGEE, Belfast, illness at, Southey, Robert, his Life of Wesley, 458, 4594, 12, 102, 353; and Wesley's Taunton, Letter from, 190. blessing, 421 ; on T. Walsh, 298 ; Taxation no Tyranny, Dr. S. Johnon Lady Maxwell, 383. son's, issued as A Calm Address, Sparrow, Mrs., of Lewisham, 290, etc., 247. proposals on, 483. 352. Spencer, John, Bristol Parliamentary I Taylor, Bishop Jeremy cited, 40, 41. candidate, help for, 469. Joseph, 183, 207 ; Letters to, Staniforth, Samson, 148. 209-215. Stanton Harcourt, the Kirkhams at, Thomas, 215; Letters to, 216, 310. 217. State Church, Wesley and a, 263. Tegworth, R., Letter to, 233. See also Church of England. Temper, varieties of, 184, 253, 321 ; Stephen, Leslie, on Wesley, 4. evil, and Christian perfection, 432. Stephens, William, Letter to, 228. Tennyson, A., quoted, 39. Sternhold and Hopkins, doggerel of, Theatre, advice to Bristol corporation 114. on, 470; Nottingham corporation Stockport, visit to, 372. forbids, 471. Stonehouse, Mr., of Manchester, 79, Thorn, William, and Kilham, 169. 155 ; Letter to, 226. Thomas, John Wesley, his 'Wesleyan Story, George, Methodist preacher, Hymn-Book Illustrated,' 239. I Thompson, Joseph, Letter to, 229. 194. 507 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Thompson, William, Methodist preacher, 124, 162. Thoughts on the Present Scarcity of Provisions, Wesley's, 483. Toleration, plea for Christian, 135. Toplady, Augustus, 149. Toronto, Victoria Methodist College, 224, 229, 325. Townsend, W, J., on Voltaire, 478. Trevecca College, Wales, J. Fletcher and, 154, 156. Tronchin, Mons., and Voltaire, 479. Truro, preaching-room for, 210. Tucker, Dean, on American colonies, 152. Tullamore, Ireland, Letters from, 107, 188. Tyerman, Luke, 125; his Life and Times 0 John Wesley', viii, xxxix, etc. ULSTER, tour in, 335. Union, Christian, 118. United Methodist Free Church Magazine, 422. . Magazine, 245, 282. —— States, 483 ; Methodism in the, 237 et seq., see also America; war with, 472, 473. VALTON, JOHN, Letters to, 130. 'Varenese,' 44, 310. See Kirkham, Miss B. Vasey, Thomas, ordained for American work, 127, 213, 258; authorised, 264 ; ordains Asbury, 279. Vazeille, Mrs. See Wesley, Mrs. John. Venn, Henry, of Huddersfield, 337, 344, 345, 422. Vine, James, of Northwick, 342. Virgil, quoted, 86; style of, 439. Virginia, U.S.A., Methodism in, 142. Voltaire, Letters concerning, 478, 479 ; Life of, 479. WALES, Thomas Coke and, 180; Methodism in, 218. Walker, Samuel, of Truro, 79, 344. Walpole, Horace, n , 23, 36. 508 Walsh, Thomas, Irish Methodist preacher, 76, 77, 195, 221, 253, 298, 308, 337, 343, 381. War, the clergy and the English Civil, 17; in America, 31, 145, 246. See also American colonies. Warburton, W., Bishop of Gloucester, 18 ; controversy with, 36, 82, 124, 434Warrington, visit to, 232. Washington, George, at Bunker's Hill, 247. Waterford, 182; visit to, 191, 223, 233Wathen, Samuel, of Bristol, 96. Webb, Captain Thomas, Professor Faulkner quoted on, 241; 244, 245 ; pension secured for, 483, 484. Wellington, Duke of, and Wesley, 14, 148. Wesley, Charles (brother), great colleague, 67 ; Letters to, 69-92 ; ceases itinerating, 321; hymns of, 67, 72, 73 ; see also separate titles; Jackson's Life of, 68, 83, 89, 311, 440, 445. Charles, Junior, Letters to, 440441. Historical Society, Proceedings of, 41, 61, 145, 158, 200, 226, 229, 371, 377, 422, 458, 479John, Mr. R. W. Gilder's poem on, Frontispiece', appearance, etc., of, 5 ; ancestry, parentage, and home of, 12, 14, 69, 84, 125, 130, 148; as 'bishop,' 278; autocracy of, 125, 130; charities of, 51, 77, 307 ; and Church of England, 90, see also Church of England ; as clergyman, 57 ; coach of, 6, 349; and controversy, 36, 409, 430; character of, 7, 8, 12, 24, 37 ; on conversation, 139, 324; conversion of, 7, 33, 61 ; deathbed scene of, 373, 377 5 and debt, 45, 46, 151 ; diaries of, 32; and his own epitaph, 323; defective eyesight, 7, fails, strain on, 145, 376, 378; ' F a t h e r ' of all Methodists, 278; friendships of, 44, 288, 353, 365, 426; handwriting of, 37 ; humour of, 20, 38 ; hymns of, 67 ; illnesses INDEX of, 7, S, 10, 251, 255, 322, 350, I knows nothing of solitary religion,* 19; ' The grand depositum which 355 5 interest in individuals, 247 ; God has lodged with the people journeys of, 6, one week's, 9, 10called Methodists,' 173; 'Think 12, 199; and lady friends, 353; and let think,' 135 ; « Time has his Letters as letters, 34, 260, 369, shaken me by the hand,' 285 ; their authenticity, viii, new, vii, ' Though I am always in haste, I xix; life of, in outline, 25 ; literary am never in a hurry,' 7. work of, 7, 89, fifteen hours a day at, 145 ; mannerisms of, 35 ; marri- Wesley, John, Journal of (Standard age of, 311, see also Wesley, Mrs. ed.), xi, xxxix, etc.; Sir W. R. J . ; motive of, 19, 22, ^7 > opposi- Nicoll on, 435. tion to, 22; ordinations by, 208, Works of, xxxviii, etc. see also Ordinations; portraits of, See also separate titles. 5 ; memorials of, in the National Life 0f} by Coke and Gallery (see frontispiece), in WestMoore, 311 ; Tyerman's, viii, minster Abbey, 67; rebukes adxxxix, etc. ; R. Green's, 93 ; Dr. ministered by, 204, 320, 324, 404, W. H. Fitchett's, 4, 310, 404 ; 455-459> received by, 334, 338, Rev. J. Telford's, 145; Julia 460; as preacher, 6, 67, 138;) Wedgwood's 420 ; Whitehead's, and his preachers, ('best') 124, ! 481 ; La Jeunesse de Wesley, Dr. I37» i83> 185, 203; and public Augustin Leger's, 41. men and matters, 36, 461-490; as I Mrs. (wife), 310, 311 ; publisher, 7, losses as, 163, 317 ; travels with, 314 ; in a mob, 317 ; resolves of, 8, 44; and robes of and Charles Wesley, 325 ; charackings, 469; and rule for conduct, ter and conduct of, 334 ; nurses 53; signatures of, 37; silver spoons her husband, 323, 355 ; leaves him, of, 478; social service of, 23, see 356; slanders him, 445; at Lady also Medical Work and Chapter Maxwell's, 396 ; death of, 356. XII. ; sermon register of, 10 ; wrote Martha (sister), 48 ; Letters to, shorthand, 366; and the super65, 66. natural, 20, see also Ghosts; tact Samuel (father), described, 12, and courtesy of, 461 ; and young 14, 47, 48, 50; Letters to, 50, 52; Christians, 452. Letter from, 48 ; quoted, 158. Wesley, John, sayings of, quoted, see (brother), 56 ; Letters to, list of Letter titles, xix; * Do all 56, 58, 61. the good you can,' etc., 423 ; * I (nephew), Letter to, 443. felt my heart strangely warmed,' Miss Sarah (niece), Letters to, 61 ; ' I have often repented of 445, 447judging too severely,' 172 ; * I look Susanna (mother), 13, 39 ; upon all the world as my parish,' Letters to, 40, 42, 44, 53. 180; * I shall never have another Family, Clarke's, 48, 112. mother,' 40 ; ' I s not this a brand and Kingswood and its Free plucked out of the fire ?' 4 0 ; Churches, Eayrs's, 70, 103, 104, ' Leisure and I have taken leave of 299. one another,' 7 ; ' Live to-day !' Conference, 408 ; ' My business on earth is to Wesleyan Methodist do all the good I can,' 70; ' My Magazine, 1871, 239. cooler thoughts,' 60, 220; ' Never West Indies, Methodists in, 237. be unemployed; never be trif- West, James, the Hon., M.P., offer lingly employed; never while away to, of time,' xiii; ' Nothing but despair Westal, raising soldiers, 470.96. Thomas, of Bristol, can destroy,' 248; ' The Bible Western Pioneers, Lockwood's, 241. 509 JOHN WESLEY'S LETTERS Whatcoat, Richard, ordained for American work, 127, 258, 264, 279. Wheatley, James, of Norwich, expulsion of, 341. White, John, of Dorchester, 85. Whitefield, George, Letters to, 26, 102, 242; separates from Wesley, 103, 124, 221 ; popularity of, 381 ; and Romanists, 469; death of, 241; Life of 180. Captain (brother), 291. Whitehaven, Letters from, 305, 333, 374, 378 ; 185, 186, 192, 206, 306, 453Whitehead, John, Letter to, 222. Whitelamb, John (brother-in-law), Wolff, George, of Balham, 288; executor, 488. Worcester, 213, 315. Word to a Freeholder•, A, Wesley's, 461. Wray, James, of Nova Scotia, 277, 284. Wride, Mrs., 194, 198, 199, 200, 203. Thomas, 33, 35, 183; Letters to, 185-207. Wright, Duncan, 124; Letters to, 147, 148. * Richard, volunteers for America, 243. Wroot, Lincolnshire, curacy of, 25 ; S. Wesley (father) writes from, 48. Wycombe, Letter from, 154. Si. Wigan, visit to, 232. Wilberforce, William, Letter to, 489. Williams, Joseph, of Kidderminster, describes Methodist services, 112. -—• Captain Richard, 211. Robert, first American Methodist publisher, 244, 245, 246. Williamson, Mr., of Savannah, marries Miss S. C. Hopkey, 310. Witness of Spirit. See Assurance. Witney, near Oxford, Edward and Miss Bolton of, 365, 366. Wolfe, Francis, Letter to, 225, 488. YARMOUTH, 199; Letter from, 438. . . York, visit to, i o ; Letter to J. Nelson at, 147 ; Letter from, 320. Yorkshire, debt effort in, 152; tour in, 168, 380; revival in, 261. Young, Edward, Poems of, 89, recommended, 449. Young friends, Letters to, 420-452. ZlNZENDORF, Count, Moravian, 26, 425. Printed in Great Britain by T. and A. CONSTABLE, Printers to His Majesty at the Edinburgh University Press