S E RMO N S ON T H E CANTICLES. ST. BERNARD, ABBOT OF CLAIRVAUX. CANTICA CANTICORUM: Eighty-Six ON THE Sermons SONG OF SOLOMON. BY SAINT BERNARD, A B B O T OF C L A I R V A U X , A . D . 1115-1153. TRANSLATED AND EDITED, WITH NOTES, BY S A M U E L J . E A L E S , M.A., D.C.L., Vicar of Stalisfield, Kent, Chaplain to the Most Honourable the Marquess of Bath. LONDON: ELLIOT STOCK, 62, PATERNOSTER 1895. ROW, E.C. TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE AND EDWARD MOST REVEREND WHITE, BY D I V I N E PROVIDENCE LORD ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY, PRIMATE OF ALL ENGLAND, AND METROPOLITAN, THIS ENGLISH VERSION OF ST. B E R N A R D ' S S E R M O N S ON T H E Is CANTICLES Dedicated, JN TOKEN OF DEEP RESPECT FOR HIS HIGH OFFICE, AND OF GRATITUDE FOR HIS PERSONAL KINDNESS, BY THE TRANSLATOR. CONTENTS. PAGE TITLE - - DEDICATION . - - INTRODUCTORY ESSAY , - TABLE OF SERMONS - - - . - - - V . - PREFACE OF DOM JOHN MABILLON - - - - • vii . ix - - - XXV I SERMONS - - - - - - - - 7.528 INDEX - - - - - - - - 529 INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. O L L O W I N G his invariable custom, the learned and laborious editor of St. Bernard's coll e c t e d w o r k s , F. John Mabillon, has prefixed to the ' Sermons on the Canticles' a critical Introduction, which is here translated. It is, however, both exceedingly brief, and does not include (what perhaps might have been exl^pected from it) any information as to the general lines of interpretation adopted respectively by the very numerous commentators who have written upon the Song of Songs, and the relation to these in which the Sermons of St. Bernard will be found to stand; much less does he supply anything in the nature of a Bibliography of the subject. Yet without some help of this kind, it will not be easy for the reader to form a just idea of the place which these Sermons occupy in the history of interpretation; and it seems needful, therefore, to furnish here a sketch of the principal facts bearing upon these subjects. Considerations of space would, in any case, make this necessarily a brief one, and that must prevent it from being X INTRODUCTORY ESSAY complete, since the number of commentators upon the Song of Songs is very great, and their works, generally speaking, excessively lengthy. This is of the less consequence for our present purpose, as the critical editions of the Song of Songs are many and excellent, and we are not proposing to add another to them. Our purpose is a much simpler one, namely, to furnish sufficient information to enable the reader to come to the perusal of St. Bernard's Sermons with a general idea of the interpretations given to the book by other pious and learned authors, so that he may see at once the position among them taken up by the Saint. I I . There are to be distinguished four great schools of interpretation: A. The Jewish allegorical, which is mystico-historical, and sees in the Song of Songs an allegorical description of various periods of the history of the Theocracy of Israel. B. The Christian allegorical, which adopts a method of treatment similar to the former, and differs from it principally in referring the allegory to the Lord Christ, and His relations with either (a) the soul of the individual believer, (b) the Church, or (c) The Blessed Virgin Mary. C. The prophetic-mystical or chronological. This regards the Song as being, so to speak, the Apocalypse of the Old Testament ; that is to say, as affording a continuous view of human history, and being partly, therefore, historical, and partly prophetic; and which takes its scope as extending from the Creation to the Final Judgment and Consummation of all things. D. The literal or erotic. This explains the Song as being an ordinary epithalamium, or love-song, which may have been founded upon actual fact or not; but in either case has no mystical character, is composed of a number of separate lyric poems, and is, in fact, a mere anthology of amatory songs, the Idyls or Bucolics of an earlier period. III. As to A., there is no clear proof that the Song was interpreted in an allegorical manner by any Rabbi before the Christian era. The passage from the LXX. (Cant. iv. 8), adduced for this purpose, is apparently a mistranslation. Ecclus. (xlvii. 14-17) and the Book of Wisdom (viii. 2) have been referred to as showing that the Song was customarily understood in a mystical sense, but without any certain result, and it is even asserted that an allegorical mode of interpretation was the conditio sine qua non of its reception into the Canon; but of this there is no proof whatever. R. AKIBA (lived in the first century A.D.) said that ' all the INTRODUCTORY ESSAY XI Scriptures are holy, but this sublime Song is most holy,' showing that he regarded it as containing mysteries; but we do not know what he considered these to be. The Talmud of Jerusalem, and also that of Babylon, contain tracts in which passages of this Song (as i. 2 ; i. 3, 13, 14; and v. 13) are quoted and commented upon; and in the Targum or Chaldee paraphrase (pub. A.D. 550) occurs the first complete commentary on the Song which has come down to us. It is in that on the five Megilloth, i.e., Song, Ruth, Lamentations, Esther, Ecclesiastes. It ' explains the Song of Songs as an allegory describing prophetically the history of the Jewish nation, beginning with their exodus from Egypt, and detailing their doings and sufferings, down to the coming of the Messiah, and the building of the third Temple' (Ginsburg, Introd., p. 28). It is not known who was the author. (A.D. 892—942). After the Chaldee paraphrase there occurs a long interval of about 350 years, during which there was no Jewish literature of which we know anything. The Dark Ages exercised the same benumbing effect apparently upon the Jewish school of Biblical interpretation as upon every other kind of intellectual culture, and the next Rabbinical commentator is R. SAADIAS, who was born at Pithom, in Egypt, in A.D. 892. He was Gaon, or spiritual head of the Jews in Babylon, and executed a translation of the Old Testament into Arabic, of which the Pentateuch portion is inserted in Walton's Polyglot. He wrote, also in Arabic, a ( Commentary on the Song of Songs,' which was translated into Hebrew by some person unknown. He agrees with the Targum in the general view he takes of the scope of the Song, but differs widely from it in the details of his interpretation. He allows that there is a great diversity of opinions as to its meaning, and assigns as a reason for this that ' t h e Song of Songs is like a lock, the key of which hath been lost.' (A.D. IOOO—A.D. 1040). The allegorical interpretation was in course of time introduced into the Jewish Liturgical services, when they endeavoured to compose sacred hymns and poems upon it, to be said or sung at their feasts or fasts. ' The Song of Songs is used in a poetical paraphrase on the first and second morning services of the Passover feast.' R. S O L O M O N B E N ISAAC ( R A S H I ) , A . D . 1 0 4 0 — 1 1 0 5 , D A V I D K I M C H I , A . D . 1190—1250, I B N E Z R A , d. A . D . 1167, M O S E S M A I M O N I D E S , d. A . D . 1204, INTRODUCTORY ESSAY xu were the chief commentators of this school. With these may be mentioned, as agreeing in the main idea of their interpretations, a certain number of Christian commentators, e.g., S. AUGUSTINE, de Civitate Dei, Lib. XVII., c. 8, 13, 20; L U T H E R , Brevis Enarratio in Cant. Canticor.; J. B R E N T I U S , L E O N . H U G , KAISER, ROSENMULLER. B. T h e Christian allegorical. This may be said, speaking generally, to comprehend all the Fathers and mediaeval writers. Of these, both the earlier in point of time, and the larger in point of number, is that school (a) which ' sees in the Bride of the Canticles the soul pining for union with God, and in the Bridegroom the Divine Love which sanctifies, purines, and elevates it to Itself (Dr. Zockler). W e can only name the chief among these: O R I G E N (d. A.D. 253. His Homilies were translated • by St. Jerome, and Commentary by Rufinus, but the latter is only extant in p a r t ) ; E U S E B I U S of CAESAREA, d. A.D. 340 (Comment, lost except a few questions); MACARIUS the EGYPTIAN (d. A.D. 390); GREGORY of NYSSA (d. A.D. 394); T H E O D O R E T , Bishop of Cyrus (d. A.D. 457); MAXIMUS CONFESSOR ; W I L L I A M , Abbot of E B E R S B E R G (d. A.D. 1085); HONORIUS of A U T U N , RICHARD of S T . VICTOR, S T . THOMAS AQUINAS, GERSON, ST. BONAVENTURA (Cardinal Bishop of Alba), S T . T E R E S A of J E S U S , S T . J O H N of the Cross, and most of the Spanish mystics. Other names might be quoted, but the later writers seem to have borrowed a good deal from the earlier (as, for example, Madame Guyon, Le Cantique des Cantiques, interprets selon le sens mystique—Grenoble, 1685), a n d to have few points of originality in their works. It is to this class that the Sermons of St. Bernard on the Canticles are to be referred. From them, and from the works of St. Teresa, the Commentary of Madame Guyon, t mentioned in the last paragraph, seems to have been in a great measure derived. A second class (b) among Christian writers interprets the Song of Songs of ' t h e relation between Christ and His Church/ Of these the chief are : S T . ATHANASIUS, Expositio in Cant. Canticorum (now lost). EPIPHANIUS, Commentarius super Cant. Salomonis (of doubtful authenticity). S T . CYRIL of JERUSALEM, Catechesis XIV. CASSIODORUS, Expositio in Cant. Cantic, (of doubtful authorship). J U S T U S ORGELITANUS, ISIDORUS HISPALENSIS, G E N E BRAND, Bishop of Aix (d. A.D. 1597), H I E R O N . OSORIUS (circa INTRODUCTORY ESSAY xiii 1600), J O H N PISCATOR (1647), J O H N GERHARD (1666, STARKE, Synopsis, Part IV.), M. F . Roos (1773); and in modern times O. von GERLACH, K E I L , HAVERNICK, H E N G S T E N BERG. (c) A third class may be styled Mystico-Mariological, and takes Shulamith in the Song of Songs to be mystically the Blessed Virgin Mary. Among these a r e : S T . AMBROSE (Sermo de Virginitate perpetud 5 . Mar ice), who explains Cant. iv. 12, ' a garden inclosed . . . a spring shut up, a fountain sealed ' of the perpetual virginity of St. Mary. S T . GREGORY the G R E A T , Expositio super Cantica Canticorum. M I C H A E L P S E L L U S the younger wrote in the eleventh century a metrical paraphrase of the Song of Songs and a prose commentary on it—both in Greek. R U P E R T of D E U T Z extends the suggestion made by S T . AMBROSE in his Sermon (see above) to a continuous explanation of the whole book. DIONYSIUS CARTHUSIANUS, G U L I E L M U S PARVUS, M I C H A E L G H I S L E R I U S , SALMERON, carrying out the hermeneutical rule, then universally received, of the threefold sense of every part of Holy Scripture, interpret all that is said of the Spouse in the Song of Songs (1) To the Church; (2) To the soul of the individual believer; (3)'To the Blessed Virgin. But the most striking example of this school of interpreters is CORNELIUS A L A P I D E (Van der Steen, d. 1637), who in his ' Commentary on the Song of Songs' deduces, indeed, a threefold sense; but while he makes the 'primus sensus,9 which he calls 'totalis et adcequatus9 to refer to Christ and the Church, and the second 'lateralis et partialis' to Christ and the holy soul, makes the third to be 'principalis,' and to denote Christ and the Blessed Virgin. Like most of the mystical writers after the time of St. Bernard, he quotes freely from these Sermons. A fourth kind of interpretation is ventured upon by a few writers, who imagine ' the figurative language of Canticles to have been the offspring of some esoteric doctrine or Egyptian hieroglyphical wisdom of Solomon' (Zockler). It m a y b e called the Mysiico-hieroglyphic Interpretation. This idea is advocated by VON PUFFENDORF, ' Umschreibung des Hohenleides, oder die Gemeine mit Christo und den Engeln im Grabe9 (1776). (' Paraphrase of the Song of Solomon, or communion with Christ and the Angels in the Grave.') ' The object described is supposed to be the participation of the believers of the Old and New Testaments in the grave and death of XIV INTRODUCTORY ESSAY the Saviour, in which also their desire for His appearing is likewise represented, and the future of the Church until the general resurrection is prophetically prefigured' (Zockler). KISTEMACHER, ' Cantic. Canticor. illustratum ex hierographid Orientali' (1818). C. The chief writers of this school, beginning with S T . A U G U S T I N E , have been named above. D. The literal or erotic school of interpreters may be said to comprise the majority of the moderns, beginning with ' t h e reformed humanist' SEBASTIAN CASTELLIO (1544), HUGH GROTIUS, J. D. MICHAELIS, LESSING, HERDER, Bishop L O W T H (De Sacra poesi Hebrceorum), B O S S U E T , Bishop of Meaux, E W A L D , H I T Z I G ; and still later E R N E S T R E N A N , J. F . T H R U P P , Dr. Otto ZCCKLER (in Lange's BibelWerk, and particularly the translation with additions by W . H . Green, D . D . : T. and T. Clark, 1870), Dr. CHRISTIAN D. GINSBURG ('The Song of Songs translated from the original H e b r e w ' : 1857). The two latter works are especially rich in the bibliography of the subject. W e have made much use of them here, and refer to G R E E N ' S ed. of ZOCKLER, and DARLING'S ' Cyclopaedia Bibliographica/ especially for lists of English commentators. We cannot omit to mention here that Bishop C H R I S T O P H E R WORDSWORTH (' Commentary on the Bible/ vol. iv., p. 3) regards our subject i as a prophetic allegory, suggested by the occasion of Solomon's marriage with Pharaoh's daughter, and descriptive of the gathering of all people into mystical union with Christ, and the consecration of the world into a church espoused to Him as the Bride.' These Sermons of St. Bernard, then, may be reckoned among * Christian-allegorical' works, in which the Song of Songs is so treated as to substitute a religious and mystical meaning for the apparent one, in which it is a drama, or series of lyrics, of human love. They do not constitute a Commentary upon it, as well for the obvious reason that throughout the eighty-six Sermons only chapters i., ii., and part of iii. are treated, 1 as also because no serious attempt is made to comment upon the Song as a whole. Each verse is considered, for the most part, independently. The preacher's usual method of proceeding is to isolate a verse, and to apply it in a way more or less arbitrary to some great spiritual t r u t h ; which he then proceeds to develop 1 His disciple, Gilbert of Hoiland, in continuing the task in forty-eight sermons more, only carried it on to v. 10, little more than half the book. INTRODUCTORY ESSAY XV independently, and most generally with great beauty and wealth of original thought. It is this strain of lofty and mystical teaching which gives to the Sermons their great attraction and principal value. But there is one fundamental conception which runs through the Sermons, and gives them such unity as they have. St. Bernard never loses grasp of the idea that the Bridegroom in the Song is the Lord Jesus, and the Bride, either the soul of the individual believer, or the totality of such souls; that is, the Church. It is, however, the individual soul that he describes, that he analyzes, that he counsels and exhorts, habitually in these Sermons. His gaze turns from time to time upon the Church—it may be said to do so even frequently—but it always comes back again to the soul of the believer as to its proper subject. To him the Divine Life in the soul was a matter of the most awful sacredness. In his thought all spiritual forces, whether for good or for evil, converged upon the soul of each individual believer, and out of it, as the result of their working, came the issues of life or of death. That the soul needs to have a thirst for Divine wisdom, and that this opens to it or in it new perceptions, which enable it to transcend outward things, to have an intuitive discernment of spiritual realities, a dim, glorious vision of mighty secrets of the higher region of thought and life, he was never tired of repeating. This was, in his view, the essential operation by which the spirit of man was made one with the Spirit of God, and it was of a nature wholly inward and spiritual, entirely hidden from the external sight, independent of outward things, and known only to the soul and to God. Thus he says in Sermon L, n. 1 1 : ' T h a t canticle the anointing of grace alone teaches, and experience only makes the soul to be familiar with it. Those who have had experience of it know it well; let those who have not had that happiness earnestly desire, not to know it, but to experience it. It is not a cry from the mouth, but the gladness of the heart; not the sounding of the lips, but the impulse and emotion of joys within; not a concert of words, but of wills moving in harmony. It is not heard without, nor does it make a sound in the streets. Only she who sings, and He in whose honour it is sung; that is, the Bridegroom and the Bride, hear the accents of that song/ This, then, he held to be the indispensable element in the process of the soul's transformation, and so emphatic was his conviction of this, that he seems to have regarded XVI INTRODUCTORY ESSAY it well-nigh as the only element that was indispensable. Though no one ever believed more fully than St. Bernard in the vivifying grace of which the Sacraments are the channels, or valued them more devoutly than he, yet he is never more emphatically a Mystic than when treating of the Sacraments. No one was to neglect them or abstain from t h e m ; no one was to think lightly of them ; but at the same time the near Presence of God was (he held) better than they, and the direct action of the Spirit in the soul more manifestly efficacious. Thus he could write of the Holy Eucharist in Sermon X X X I I I . , n. 3 : ' I have the W O R D also here below, but in the Flesh; the Truth also is set before me for nourishment, but in the Sacrament. An Angel is rendered fat with the finest of the wheat, and filled with the pure grain ; but it behoves me [since I am on earth] to be content during this life with the Sacrament, as with a husk; with the Flesh, as with b r a n ; with the letter, as with chaff; with faith, as with a veil [upon the truth]. And such things as these bring death in the tasting (Rom. viii. 6-13), unless they be seasoned in some degree with the firstfruits of the Spirit. Assuredly, I can find only death in the pottage, unless it be rendered sweet with the meal of the Prophet (2 Kings iv. 41). Indeed, without the Spirit even the Sacrament is received only to condemnation; the flesh profiteth nothing (John vi. 63) ; the letter killeth (2 Cor. iii. 6) ; and faith itself is dead. But it is the Spirit that quickeneth these [means of grace], that I may live in them. But with whatever abundance of the Spirit those things may be enriched, it is not possible to find the same sweetness in the husk of the Sacrament, and in the fatness of the wheat; in faith as in vision; in remembrance as in presence; in time as in eternity; in the reflection in a mirror as in the countenance itself that is reflected; in the form of a servant as in the Image of God.' Yet he fully valued the sacramental principle, as priceless for edification and for training in righteousness. There may have been dimly present to his mind the consciousness that it was not given to all souls to dwell upon these lofty heights of serene contemplation and mystical rapture ; and that for the vast majority of Christian souls, the Sacraments form both the necessary means of salvation, as well as the nearest approach they are capable of sustaining, in this life, to the Ineffable Presence. H e would even have extended the principle farther, so as to invest a beautiful and symbolical usage of the Cistercian Order, the washing of the feet of the INTRODUCTORY ESSAY XV11 brethren—pedum ablutio—with somewhat of sacramental grace, and remarks : ' That we may have no lingering doubt regarding the forgiveness of our daily trespasses : we have a Sacrament which symbolizes it, the* * washing of feet " . . . . And that there is somewhat hidden in this which is necessary for salvation, is shown in that not even Peter himself had, without it, any part in the kingdom of Christ and of God ' (John xiii. 8). (Sermon in Carta Domini, n. 4). Doubtless it was this sentiment that the soul of man is the fittest tabernacle here below for the Divine Presence, that made him so uncompromising a Puritan with regard to Church architecture and art. For the beautiful in art he seems to have had no taste whatever; it was even repulsive to him ; and ornamented Churches he blamed in the Cluniac and other orders, and positively forbade to the houses of his own Rule. ' O vanity of vanities,' he says of it in one place, ' and not more vain than foolish ! The Church glistens on all its walls, but the poor are not there ! It clothes its stones with gold, but leaves the poor, its children, to their nakedness. At the expense of the needy it feasts the eyes of the rich. The curious find what pleases them, but the wretched find nothing to give them succour.' (Apolog. ad Guil. Abbat. c. xii.) This horror of outward ornament in things sacred he sedulously impressed upon his followers. While he lived, the Cistercian Abbeys were, in their Churches, vestments and ritual, the emphatic expression of a bare and unadorned simplicity. * Scarcely any ornament was admitted; no sumptuous hangings, no splendid paintings or mosaic pavements, no crucifixes made of silver or gold and set with jewels. The chalice alone might be of silver, and the vestments of the clergy of plain linen only. Their Church windows were to be entirely of white glass without coloured enrichments. No bell-towers in their Abbeys, whether of stone or wood, were to be of immoderate height. Every detail of construction was to show a studied bareness and plainness.' 1 W e know little of the appearance of the earliest Church of Clairvaux, which would enable us to judge how St. Bernard carried out this principle, so to speak, in his own house. But the Church of Fontenay, the second daughter-house of Clairvaux, which was founded in 1119, less than four years after he became an Abbot, is still extant, though secularized ; and it exhibits, in the opinion of so 1 ' St. Bernard, Abbot of Clairvaux,' p. 66, S.P.C.K. b xvm INTRODUCTORY ESSAY competent a judge as M. Viollet-le-Duc, the true type of the primitive Cistercian basilica. ' Of extreme simplicity, of a robust and masculine beauty, it bears the deep impress of that rigorous asceticism which was the especial stamp of the new and growing institution. . . . Those austere cenobites, who waged with their senses a war without truce or mercy, who kept their eyelids lowered before the Pope and the splendours of his suite, who had fled from the world in order to be nearer heaven, and to obtain it the more quickly, took care to give to the architecture of their Churches the special character which it was intended, in their view, to discharge. It was apparently in their thought that the severe aspect of the building, and its wide bare surfaces, should conduce to grave meditation, should inspire a kind of religious awe, favourable to collectedness and pious contemplation.' 1 The inward, not the outward, kind of beauty was to be the aim of all endeavour; and this aim the Saint, in these Sermons and elsewhere in his writings, was never wearied of urging. If, then, the Holy Spirit, in his direct action upon the human soul, was to St. Bernard the causa causans of the new creation which issued in a perfect salvation and blessedness, and if some degree of spiritual aspiration and effort were the condition which rendered that action fruitful, he would never fail, in his exhortations, to insist also upon the necessity of Charity or Love. This he constantly teaches must be sincere, living, and continually increasing so as to have no limit; so as to surge over every obstacle, either in the nature or circumstances of the individual soul, or those of others, unless all progress in a spiritual direction was to be nugatory or even hurtful. Great gifts and lofty aspirations, if without charity, he holds to be, if not sins themselves, yet but too easily, or almost inevitably, the cause of sins. To these he traces the fall of the devil, and finds in him the perfect exemplification of knowledge and ability without love. (Sermon III., Pro Dominica i. Novembris, nn. i, 2, 3, 4). ' In vain/ he says, ' does one who has no knowledge of love come to hear, or to read, the Song of Love, since it is in nowise possible for a cold and icy heart to comprehend a discourse fervid and glowing. As one who does not understand Greek comprehends nothing said by him who speaks in that tongue . . . so the language of love, to one who 1 See Chomton, St, Bernard et h Chateau de Fontaines-les-Dijon, ii., p. 82. Dijon, 1894. INTRODUCTORY ESSAY XIX knows it not, will be (as it were) barbarous; it will be as sounding brass and a tinkling cymbal/ ((Serm. in Cant.' lxxix., n. i). Yet another striking characteristic of these Sermons is their Scriptural character. No reader of them can help noticing how small is the number of quotations in them from the writings of the Fathers, and how vast the number from every part of the Holy Scriptures. Of Bernard it may truly be said that, like the Psalmist, he might have declared, 'Lord, what love have I unto Thy law : all the day long is my study in it! There are not, throughout all these Sermons on the Song of Songs, a dozen quotations from any extraneous source whatever; 1 while those from the Holy Scriptures may be numbered by hundreds, so that in many passages his sentences form a continuous cento of Scripture language and phrases. He was so familiar with the text of the Vulgate, particularly in the Psalms and the writings of the Prophets, that their language became his own, and his thoughts naturally expressed themselves in it.2 1 Generally speaking, and exceptions apart, the only Fathers that St. Bernard ever quotes are St. Augustine and St. Gregory. 2 A magnificent MS. Latin Bible in two volumes folio, belonging to the first half of the twelfth century, was preserved at Clairvaux down to the time of the suppression of the Abbey in 1790-92, and thence transferred to the Municipal Library at Troyes, in which it bears the number 458. It is written in two columns to the page, and has the initial letters adorned in colours and gold, many of them also with pictures. At the beginning of the first volume is the inscription in Gothic characters, in a hand of the twelfth century : $ar:s J3rtma Bible Btatt IfornartK &bbatts (Elareballte* These details are extracted from a notice inserted in the Me'moires de la Societe Academique de PAube (Troyes, 1842, p. 246), by M. H a r m a n d , Librarian of the city of Troyes. It is known, therefore, as the ' Bible of St. Bernard/ and * appears to have really belonged to that illustrious man ' (D'Arbois de Jubainville, Etudes des Abbayes Cisterciennes, p. 97, Paris, 1858). It is said to have been that used by him when composing these ' Sermons on the Canticles.' In this Bible, the Cantica Canticorum occupies two leaves only. ' I n examining them, it seems/ says a celebrated bibliophile, ' that the eyes still discern resting upon them the venerable hand which has almost worn them out with continually turning them over and over, while engaged in drawing from them those eighty-six sermons.' M. L'Abbe Serisier, Cure Doyen of Ervy (Aube), and formerly a vicaire of the Cathedral at Troyes, informs me that there are MS. notes on the margins of this Bible in the handwriting of the Saint. In 1517 an ancient room in the Abbey of Clairvaux, panelled in wood above, was still shown and known as the Chamber of St. Bernard, in which he was said to have composed Cantica Ca?iticorum,' qui est de bois a la mode anticque, lambrissee dessus en maniere d'eglise . . . et joignant ladicte chambre y a ung petit oratoire, en maniere d'une chapelle, appellee XX INTRODUCTORY ESSAY But apart from that, his mind was too rapid and vigorous in its action to lend itself easily to the habit of discursive quotation which may delight a thinker of a more deliberate and leisurely character. He pioneered for the most part his own luminous track of thought, and there are very few provinces •of the spiritual life, as conceived from the monastic point of view, which he does not find occasion to traverse. There is indeed this one obvious limitation. He was addressing an audience of monks; he looks at all things through the loopholes of the cloister; he treats of the occupations, the studies, the dangers, the besetting temptations, and the ideals of monks; and for each and all of these subjects he finds an occasion in the Song. Either he finds in it, or perhaps he not unfrequently reads into it, and extracts from it by a loving casuistry, the deepest lessons of Christian duty, the most touching and pathetic experiences of Christian life. The Sermons are tremulous with an incessant shimmer of allegories, allegories wholly arbitrary, in most instances wholly without foundation in the text treated of, and yet so rich in their spiritual suggestiveness, that they strike upon the mind like rays straight from heaven, and belonging to 'the light that never was on sea or shore.' Thus he explains the kiss of the Mouth of God, desired by the Bride in the Song, of the Holy Spirit, by whom the mystery of the Holy Trinity is communicated to the Church (Sermon VIII.). Of the kiss itself of God (he distinguishes between the two), he says that it is the miracle of the Incarnation, in which the Divine Word is joined, in the Hypostatic Union, to human nature (Sermon II.). To kiss the Foot of God is the sign of forgiveness ; to kiss His Hand, that of sanctity and virtue; but to kiss His Mouth is the sign of self-consuming spiritual fervour, perfect love, and mystical communion with the Divine Nature (Sermons III., IV.). The sense of religious hope, or fear in the soul, is the impress of mercy or of j u d g m e n t ; that is, of one or of the other Foot of God (Sermon VI.). The Breasts of the Bridegroom, that is, Christ, are, the one, the patience with which He waits for the sinner; the other, the willingness and kindness wherewith He receives him (Sermon IX.). The three chief ointments of the spirit are contrition, La Chapelle Sainct Bernard^ sur le pas et marche de laquelle est escript ce mot: Hie : qui est le lieu ou monseigneur sainct Bernard rendit l'esprit sur des cendres' (Record of a visit made by the Queen of Sicily, the Count and Countess of Guise, to Clairvaux in 1517, LAbbaye de Clairvaux en 1517 et en 1709, Paris, 1866, p. 23 and note).—ED. INTRODUCTORY ESSAY XXI devotion, goodness. The first stinging, and giving pain ; the second anodyne, and relieving pain ; the third healing, which drives out the disease (Sermon X.). And so on, through a veritable forest of brightly-coloured allegorical fancies, hanging in a kind of Debatable Land, or Limbo Puerorum, between the earth of prosaic fact and the heaven of settled dogma. This is, in fact, a phrase of his own, as when he says: ' I thought that we should quickly traverse that forest, sombre and shady with allegories, and arrive, in a journey of perhaps one day, at the open plain of the moral meanings of our subject; but it has proved otherwise. . . . The eye of an observer at a distance traverses in a moment the tops of great masses of verdure, and marks the mountain peaks; but it cannot pierce into the vast depths of the low-lying valleys, or penetrate the obscure coverts of the thickets (Sermon XVI., n. i ) . Perhaps the most singular fact with regard to these wonderful Sermons, or, at least, that which strikes a modern reader of them with most surprise and astonishment, is that they have throughout, as a theme absolutely fundamental, just that very element in human life which was forbidden to every monk by the rigid conditions of his profession, which it was sin in him to desire, or even to make the subject of his contemplation: that is to say, the conjugal relation, the solace and the sweetness of the mutual affection of husband and wife. To the faithful monk this was forbidden ground. It was his strenuous endeavour eventually to root out altogether, and, in the meantime, to crush down with ruthless severity, every faculty and feeling, every regretful longing or momentary tenderness of thought which tended to render him like unto the general mass of human kind who * marry and are given in marriage.' The ideal of his conventual profession, as well as the specific vows which he had taken upon him at entering it, equally forbade this. Yet in these Sermons we find the saintly Abbot, as if he had been addressing an audience of persons who were actually married, or who might hereafter be so, selecting for his subject the impassioned affections of a Bridegroom and a Bride, and making the ebb and flow of their feelings, the tender or romantic incidents of their attachment, the vehicle of his moral teachings. Surely this is the strangest paradox in the history of the pulpit, that St. Bernard should discourse upon marriage to those who could never be married, and paint before their eyes, in rich and glowing colours, idyllic pictures of an affection which they had all definitively renounced. XXI1 INTRODUCTORY ESSAY Upon this strange tour de force two observations may be made. First, that it is a glorified and idealized marriage which is his subject. It is but the terms of his narrative which he borrows from earth, for that which he uses them to describe belongs to heaven. All that is distinctive, all that is individual in sentiment, is merged in the deep and flowing stream of spiritual experiences. The saintly preacher is the opposite of Antaeus in a well-known Greek myth, the antagonist of Heracles, for though he ever and anon touches the earth, his strength and his persuasiveness, the staple of his teaching, and that which gives to it its peculiar character, are altogether unearthly. * He spoke to men/ says the historian Fleury, ' the language of Angels, and they were scarcely able to understand it.' 1 In the second place, if he addresses himself in a marked degree to that element which in the monastic character was, as it were, a force unappropriated and unused, it is that he may utilize it for good, and in employing it may transform it into something higher than itself. It has ever been the wont of the Church to make use of all the elemental forces of human nature, however far removed they may appear to be from her especial sphere. Thus there can hardly be any feeling farther alien to the character of the ' Gospel of p e a c e ' than the combative instinct which drives men on to war and bloodshed. Yet the Church (needfully and warily, it is true) enlists it in her service, and teaches her people to sing: ' Onward, Christian soldiers, Marching as to war.' The Christian is bidden to ' put on the whole armour of God.' He is to be ' Christ's faithful soldier and servant unto his life's end '; and thus the forces which give energy, and consistency, and patience to human effort are enrolled in the army of Salvation, and made to do yeoman's service against evil. It is probably a similar utilization of the primitive forces of human nature that we are to see in these Sermons on the Canticles. There is still another characteristic quality of these Sermons, that no attentive student <)f them will be able to overlook, that is to say, their prodigal wealth of imagination. ' One would hardly know,' says a recent lecturer on Bernard, 2 ' where to find a brighter exaniple of the power which 1 2 Histoire Ecclesiastique^ vol. xiv., p. 193. Dr. R. S. Storrs. INTRODUCTORY ESSAY XX111 is imparted to the preacher by this always noble, if sometimes misleading and dangerous, faculty. It is perpetually apparent in Bernard. Whatever else he is or is not, he is never commonplace. His mind is fruitful in large suggestions, and the text is often hardly more than the nest from which, like the eagle, he lifts himself on eager wing to touch, if he may, the stars of light. One of these Sermons on the Canticles, for example, treats of the angelical love toward God, according to the differing orders of angels; another, on the darkness and beauty of the Bride, discusses the question why it is that hearing is of more value than seeing in matters of faith; another, on the ointments of the beloved, exhibits the nature of four principal virtues ; another presents the excellency of the Vision of God, and the measure in which the sense of the Divine Presence will vary in good men according to their varying aspirations; another still, impresses the truth that while knowledge of literature may be profitable for intellectual culture, the knowledge of one's own weakness is more profitable for salvation. There is hardly any theme of practical spiritual religion for which he does not find suggestion, toward which he does not take incentive, in the parts of the Song which come under his view ' (' Bernard of Clairvaux,' p. 400). Upon the whole, we cannot but think that every reader will find these, notwithstanding the old-world mould in which they are cast, emphatically helpful Sermons. The writer had the gift of spiritual sympathy in a marvellous and almost unexampled degree ; his sentences palpitate, as it were, with an ardent love for souls. To teach, to reprove, to encourage, to warn his hearers; to lead them onward in ways of pleasantness, and along paths of peace, * T o warn the sinner, cheer the saint, To feed Thy lambs and tend Thy sheep,' is the intention and object always present to the preacher. In him the pastor and the poet meet. ' Whatever his object, however familiar, or even apparently trivial, there is always a light thrown upon it by his imagination, which is like the light of golden brown or royal purple which rests upon Italian hills. Cottage and villa, the rocky cliff, the squalid town, are in that light as if transfigured. So the commonest theme stands to Bernard invested with an unworldly radiance, because connected with infinite truths and immeasurable destinies. Whatever his immediate point of view, he sees xxi y INTRODUCTORY ESSAY the glory of God before him, in Creation and Redemption, and the majestic meaning and pathos in all human life.' Sermons of which this may be truly said cannot, however antique be their form, be altogether out of date ; nor can they have wholly lost their power to attract and to influence readers of this generation. It is with the conviction that this is the case that they are here put before the English public. S A M U E L J. EALES. TABLE OF ST. BERNARD'S SERMONS ON T H E SONG OF SONGS. SERMON I. T h e Title (Cant. i. i) II. T h e Incarnation of Christ expected (Cant. i. i) I I I . W h a t it is to kiss the Feet, the Hand, and the Lips of the Lord (Cant. i. 1) IV. T h e threefold progress of the soul, arising from the kiss of the Foot, the Hand, and the Lips of the Lord (Cant. i. 1) V. Of the Four Orders of Spirits ; viz., the Spirit of God, of the Angels, of man, and of the beast (Cant. i. 1) VI. Of the Supreme and Infinite Spirit, who is God ; and of the sense in which mercy and judgment are called the Feet of God (Carit. i. 1) V I I . Of the ardent love of the soul for God ; and of the care and attention that ought to be given to prayer and to psalmody (Cant. i. 1)V I I I . That the kiss of God is the Holy Spirit ; and that the Church asks for this kiss, that she may have the knowledge of the Holy Trinity (Cant. i. 1) IX. Of the breasts of the Bridegroom: of which the one is patience in waiting for the conversion of sinners ; the other, benignity in receiving them (Cant. i. 2) X. Of the three spiritual perfumes : namely, penitence, devotion, and piety (Cant. i. 2) XI. Of two principal facts in human redemption : the manner in which it is accomplished, and the benefits which we derive from it (Cant. i. 2) X I I . Of the perfume of piety, which is the most excellent of all ; and of the respect which those who are under authority ought to have for those set over them (Cant. i. 2) X I I I . That praise and glory is always to be rendered unto God, for all the good gifts which we receive of H i m (Cant. i. 2) XIV. Of the Church of faithful Christians ; and of the Synagogue of perfidious Jews (Cant. i. 2) - PAGE 7 12 17 21 24 29 33 38 43 49 55 60 67 74 XXVI TABLE OF ST. BERNARD'S SERMONS SERMON XV. In what manner the N a m e of Jesus is a salutary medicine to faithful Christians in all adversities (Cant. i. 2) X V I . Of contrition of h e a r t : and of the three kinds of true confession (Cant. i. 2) X V I I . That it is needful to observe with care the approach and the departure of the Holy Spirit ; and of the envy of the devil towards the human race (Cant. i. 2) X V I I I . Of the two operations of the Holy Spirit, of which the one is called effusion, and the other infusion (Cant. i. 3) • X I X . Of the nature, manner, and properties of the Angelical love towards God, according to the several Orders of Angels (Cant. i. 3) XX. Of the three ways in which we love God (Cant. i. 3) X X I . In what manner the Bride, that is, the Church, asks that she may be drawn to follow after her Spouse, who is Christ (Cant. i. 3) X X I I . Of the four perfumes of the Bridegroom : and of the four cardinal virtues (Cant i. 3) X X I I I . Of three ways of contemplating God, represented under the figure of three storerooms (Cant. i. 4) XXIV. Principally against the detestable vice of detraction : and in what rectitude in a man chiefly consists (Cant. i. 4) XXV. That the Bride, namely, the Church, is black, yet comely (Cant. i. 5) X X V I . St. Bernard laments the death of his brother Gerard (Cant. i. 5) X X V I I . Of the adornment of the Bride : and in what sense the holy soul is called heaven (Cant. i. 5) X X V I I I . Of the blackness, yet beauty, of the Bride : and in what manner hearing, rather than sight, avails in matters of faith, and to the knowledge of the truth (Cant. i. 5)X X I X . Of the complaint of the Church against her persecutors ; that is to say, against those who sow division amongst brethren (Cant. i. 6) X X X . That the faithful people, or the souls of the elect, are signified by the vineyards, of which the Church is called the g u a r d i a n ; and that the prudence of the flesh is death (Cant. i. 6) X X X I . T h e excellency of the Vision of God. How at the present time the delight in the Divine Presence felt by holy men varies according to the varying desires of their soul (Cant. i. 7) X X X I I . Christ communicates Himself to the holy soul as Bridegroom, and to the soul that is weak and imperfect PAGE 79 86 95 100 104 109 116 123 130 143 149 155 167 176 186 192 201 ON T H E SONG OF SONGS SERMON XXXIII. XXXIV. XXXV. XXXVI. XXXVII. XXXVIII. XXXIX. XL. X L I. XLII. X L I I I. XXVH PAGE as Physician. Of the moods of the soul; how they differ from each other, a n d from what causes (Cant. i. 7) - 207 Of those things which a devout soul ought to seek without ceasing. W h a t is to be understood by the word 'noon? a n d of four classes of temptations to b e sedulously avoided (Cant. i. 7) -214 Of humility and of patience (Cant. i. 8) - 224 Of the sharp reproof which the Bridegroom gives to the Bride: and of two kinds of ignorance which are especially to be feared and avoided (Cant. i. 8) - 227 That the knowledge of literature is good for our instruction, but the knowledge of our own infirmity is more useful to salvation (Cant. i. 8) - 233 Of the two kinds of knowledge and the two kinds of ignorance : the evils or injuries caused by these (Cant. i. 8) - 238 How from ignorance of God comes despair : and how the Bride is called the fairest among women (Cant. i. 8) - 243 Of the chariots of Pharaoh, that is, the devil ; a n d of the chiefs of his army, who are malice, sensuality, and avarice (Cant. i. 9) - 247 W h a t is meant by the face of the soul ; what constitutes its beauty or its deformity, its solitude a n d its modesty (Cant. i. 10) - 252 Of the great consolation which the Bride feels from the contemplation of the Divine Glory, before she attains to the clear vision of it (Cant. i. 10) - 255 Of two kinds of humility : the one born of truth, the other warmed by charity (Cant. i. 12) - 259 H o w meditation on the Sufferings a n d the Passion of J E S U S CHRIST enables the Bride, that is, the faithful soul, to pass uninjured alike through the prosperity a n d the adversity of this world (Cant. i. 13) - 266 X L I V . That correction ought to be adapted to the character of offenders, so that those of humble and complying disposition should b e gently dealt with, but the stubborn and obstinate severely chastened to oblige them to reform (Cant. i. 14) - 271 XLV. Of the twofold beauty of the soul : how the soul speaks to God the W T ORD, and the W O R D to the soul, and what language they employ (Cant. i. 15) - 275 X L V I . Of the state and composition of the whole Church. Also of the manner in which, by an active life spent XXViii SERMON TABLE OF ST. B E R N A R D ^ SERMONS PAGE under obedience, the life of contemplation may be attained (Cant. i. 16) - 281 XLVI I. Of the threefold flower [of holiness], namely, of virginity, of martyrdom, and of good works ; and of the devotion with which we should participate in Divine Service (Cant. ii. 1) -287 XLVIII. Of the praises which the Bride and the Bridegroom address reciprocally to each other ; and how by the Shadow of Christ is to be understood His Flesh, and faith in Him (Cant. ii. 2) - 292 XLIX. How charity is regulated by discretion, so that all the members of the Church, that is, the elect, are held together by mutual bonds (Cant. ii. 4) 297 L. Of two kinds of charity, namely, that of feeling and that of action: and how they are co-ordinated (Cant. ii. 4) - 302 LI. How the Bride makes petition that the fruits of good works and the perfumes of faith may be made to abound with her as flowers: and also concerning hope and fear (Cant. ii. 5) - 308 LI I. Of that ecstasy, which is called contemplation: in which the Bridegroom causes the holy soul to attain peace and rest, being earnestly desirous of its blessedness (Cant. ii. 7) - 314 LI 11. By ' mountains' and 'hills' are signified the heavenly spirits, over whom and through whom the Bridegroom passes in His Coming to earth ; that is, in the Mystery of His Incarnation (Cant. ii. 8) - 319 LIV. Another interpretation ; in which by mountains are signified Angels and men ; and by hills, demons. Also of the threefold fear with which everyone ought to feel anxiety, lest he should lose the grace of acting rightly, which he has received from God (Cant. ii. 8) - 324 LV. How it is possible, through a true penitence, to escape the judgment of God (Cant. ii. 9) 332 LVI. That sins and vices are as walls, interposing between God and the sinner (Cant. ii. 9) - 335 LVI I. That the visitations of the Lord are to be carefully and reverently observed : and by what signs and tokens they may be known (Cant. ii. 10) - 340 LVIII. How the Bridegroom bids the Bride, that is to say, those men who are perfected, to undertake the rule and training of souls less perfect. Also of the cutting down of vices in them, that virtues may grow and increase (Cant. ii. 10) 347 ON THE SONG OF SONGS LIX. Of the groans of the soul which sighs for its heavenly fatherland : and of the commendation of chastity and widowhood (Cant. ii. 12) LX. Of the incredulity of the Jews ; and of their slaying Christ, by which they filled up the measure of their fathers (Cant. ii. 13) L X I . How the Church finds the riches of Divine mercy in the hollows of Christ's open Wounds : and of the fortitude of the martyrs, which they have received of Christ (Cant. ii. 13) LXI I. W h a t is meant by the abiding of the faithful soul in the clef ts of the rock, and what in the secret places of the stairs. T h a t it is needful rather to search what is the Will of God than to search into His Majesty. And that purity of intention is necessary to the preaching of the truth (Cant. ii. 14) L X I 11. That a man who is pious and wise ought to cultivate carefully his vineyard, that is to say, his life, his soul, and his conscience; that there are two kinds of foxes, namely, flatterers and detractors ; and of the temptations of monks in their novitiate (Cant. ii. 15) . L X I V . Of the temptations of more mature monks ; by what foxes they are infested, that is, by what temptations they are most tried. Also of the taking of heretics, who are the foxes of the Church (Cant. ii. 15) Letter of Eberwin, Provost of Steinfeld, to Abbot Bernard, respecting the heretics of his time LXV. Of secret heretics, whose perverse doctrines and studied care to hide their mysteries St. Bernard severely censures ; also their scandalous behaviour (Cant. ii. 15) ' " ' ' L X V I . Concerning the errors of heretics with respect to marriage, to the Baptism of infants, to purgatory, to prayers for the dead, and to the invocation of the Saints (Cant. ii. 15) L X V I I . Of the wonderful expression of the love of the Bride, which is called forth by the affection of her Bridegroom, Christ (Cant. ii. 16) L X V I I I . How Christ the Bridegroom inclines unto and gives attention to His Bride, which is the Church ; and how she likewise inclines unto Him. Of the care which God has for His elect. Also of the merit, and the confidence, of the Church (Cant. ii. 16) L X I X . All that lifts itself up against the knowledge and service of God is to be abased. In what way the F A T H E R and the WORD come into a soul that loves, and take XXIX 354 360 366 371 378 383 388 393 399 408 415 XXX TABLE OF ST. BERNARD'S SERMONS SERMON LXX. L X X I. LXXII. LXXIII. LXXIV. LXXV. LXXVI. LXXVII. LXXVIII. PAGE up their abode in i t ; and of the close relation that is thus entered into between God and the soul (Cant. ii. 16) W h y the Bridegroom is called Beloved; and of the truth, the gentleness, the righteousness, and the other virtues, which are called lilies, and among which H e is said to feed (Cant. ii. 16) Of spiritual lilies, that is, good works : of which the fragrance is a right intention, and the colour a good reputation; a n d h o w t h e Bridegroom both nourishes these, and is nourished by them. Also of the unity of God the Father with the Son, and of the holy soul with God (Cant. ii. 16) T h e meaning of the words ' T h e day breaks and the shadows flee away.' T h e various days in the lives of men expounded. That the righteous live in light, and that a brighter day awaits them ; but that the wicked, who are devoted to works of darkness, can look forward only to eternal night (Cant. ii. 16, 17) How Christ shall come to judge in human form, that H e may appear delightful to the elect: and how H e is less than the Angels, yet loftier than they (Cant. ii. 17) Of the visitations of the Bridegroom, the W O R D , to the holy soul, and the secrecy with which they are made. St. Bernard states his own experience of this, with great humility and modesty, for the edification of his hearers (Cant. ii. 17) God is to be sought in due time, place, and manner. That now is the acceptable time, in which anyone may find God for himself by good works, and may work out his salvation (Cant. iii. 1) Of the glory of the Bridegroom, in which H e sits at the Right H a n d of His Father,and is coequal with Him. How careful, watchful, and discreet good Pastors ought to be in feeding the souls given into their charge (Cant. iii. 2) Concerning the bad pastors of the Church. Also how the Blessed in Heaven, and the Angels, come to the aid of the elect, who are still pilgrims upon the earth (Cant. iii. 2) That the Bride, that is to say, the Church of the elect, was predestinated by God before all a g e s ; and prevented by His grace that she should seek H i m and be converted (Cant. iii. 2) - 420 426 432 441 448 454 461 468 474 479 ON T H E SONG OF SONGS SERMON L X X I X . Of the strong and indissoluble love wherewith the soul holds to its Lord ; also of the Return of the Bridegroom at the ending of the age, to save the Synagogue of the Jews (Cant. iii. 3) LXXX. An acute and profound argument respecting the Image or W O R D of God, and the soul, which is created in that image : and concerning the error of Gilbert, Bishop of Poictiers (Cant. iii. 3) L X X X I . Of the similarity and likeness of the soul to the W O R D , in respect of its identity of essence, its immortality of existence, and its freedom of will (Cant. iii. 3) L X X X I I. How the soul, while still remaining like unto God, loses by sin a portion of its likeness to H i m in its simplicity, immortality, and liberty (Cant. iii. 3) L X X X I I I . Of the manner in which the soul, however corrupted it may be with evil habits, is still able, by a chaste and holy love, to recover its resemblance to the Bridegroom, that is, Christ (Cant. iii. 3) L X X X I V . T h a t the soul, seeking God, is anticipated by H i m : and in what consists that search for God in which it is thus anticipated (Cant. iii. 1) LXXXV. Of the seven needs of the soul, on account of which it seeks the W O R D . W h e n the soul is once reformed, it draws near to contemplate Christ, and to enjoy the sweetness of His Presence (Cant. iii. 1) L X X X V L Of the caution and modesty becoming to the soul in seeking the W O R D , and of the praise of modesty (Cant. iii. 1) - XXXI PAGE 483 487 494 501 507 511 516 525 SERMONS ON THE SONG OF SONGS P R E F A C E OF DOM J O H N MABILLON (TO VOL. IV. OF HIS SECOND E D I T I O N ) . A L T H O U G H all the works of St. Bernard are filled with the sap of solid piety and sound doctrine, yet there are two of them which are especially valued by all, namely, the [five] ' Books on Consideration,' and the ' Sermons on the Song of Songs.' In the former work is, in fact, contained, in a form as elegant as it is concise, whatsoever is most sacred in the Holy Scriptures, and in the decrees of councils, as also whatsoever is most salutary in the writings of the ancient Fathers, and in the decrees of Pontiffs with regard to the government of the Church. Similarly in these sermons will be found all that our holy Doctor has penned throughout all his other works for the purpose of forming a [religious] character and arousing piety; all that has relation to vices, to virtues, and to the whole of the spiritual life. All these subjects, I repeat, are treated anew in the sermons before us, and that with added solidity and loftiness. The preacher brings into view the mystical and allegorical senses of the text, and finds in them all the secrets of perfection, doing this in a manner as useful and delightful as it is sublime. So that these sermons may be considered, as it were, a treasury of chaste delights for pious souls. This manner of writing we call both delightful and useful. For this is, according to the testimony of St. Bernard himself, ' the condition, at once wonderful and pitiable, of human souls, that, although by the vivacity of their genius they are capable of perceiving so many things external to themselves, they nevertheless need corporeal figures and similitudes, in order that from these outward and visible things they may conjecture something of the invisible and inward realities.' 1 In attaining which object St. Bernard has admirably succeeded in the sermons before us. 2. St. Bernard made a commencement upon this remarkable work 1 'Sermons de Diversis,' vi. I. But the passage is quoted in a condensed form, some sentences having been omitted.—ED. 2 PREFACE OF DOM JOHN MABILLON in the year 1135, after his return from Aquitaine, as appears from his * Life' (' Ernald,' Bk. II., c. 6 ) : ' The man of God, having obtained an interval of quiet, occupied himself with other affairs ; and, withdrawing into a bower formed of a trellis covered with sweet peas, he occupied himself in solitary meditations upon Divine things. And suddenly there came to him in that humble hermitage, as to one sitting in the Lord's dwelling, songs of love, and the feasts of spiritual nuptials.' For a long time he poured forth his soul in meditation upon these things ; he has expounded them in many forms ; and it is manifest to all who read them how greatly he, who feasted daily upon those dainties, benefited thereby; and how great benefit we may also derive, for whom the remains of that blessing in [the study of] Scripture have been preserved.' Geoffrey also, in his continuation of the ' L i f e ' (Bk. iii., c. 7), thus expresses himself: ' I n the sermons upon the Song of Songs, he shows himself both a magnificent investigator of the mystical sense, and expounds the moral to edification.' It is evident, from the exordium of the second of those sermons, that this book was begun during the Advent of the year named above, viz., 1135. For he speaks thus: 'Behold, how many there are who shall rejoice in this, His Nativity, which is shortly to be celebrated,' etc. 3. It is evident that Bernard des Fortes, the Carthusian, was, if not the suggester, at least the encourager, of this undertaking; and this appears from the letter of Bernard (No. 153) to him, in which the Saint alleges his want of ability, in answer to his earnestly begging for an exposition, or some spiritual work upon the Canticles from his hand ; yet at length yields to his fervent request, whether this is to be explained of the undertaking of the work, or the publication of one already commenced. The words of Ep. 153 favour this latter opinion : ' I yield to your importunity, so as to put an end to all your doubts. I am dealing with a friend. I no longer spare my modesty, and in doing what you wish, I will not think that I am committing a folly. 1 am having transcribed for you some sermons lately delivered on the beginning of the Canticles, and I send them to you as quickly as possible before they are made public. When I have time, according as Christ assigns me my tasks, I will endeavour to proceed with this work.' From which words it comes out clearly that Bernard des Portes had asked for some spiritual work from our Bernard, who had sent to him the first sermons on the Song of Songs. I do not know whether it is to this Bernard that the passage in Sermon I., n. 3, is to be taken as referring: ' I do not think that the friend who has come to us from his journey will have reason to murmur against us, when he shall have taken of that third loaf; that I must leave to others to decide. Lastly, it was to Bernard des Portes that the earlier sermons were addressed, at the same time as Ep. 154, in which I read these words: ' I am sending on to you the sermons on the beginning of the Song of Songs, which you asked for, and I promised; and when you have read them, I beg you to give me your PREFACE OF DOM JOHN MABILLON 3 advice as soon as possible, whether I ought to give them up, or proceed with them,' which may be understood indifferently of the planning out and of the completion of the work. 4. Although St. Bernard was in the habit of preaching almost every day to his monks at Clairvaux, yet he was not able, during the eighteen years which he lived after this, to complete the work which he had begun ; he found himself often distracted by various affairs both of Church and State, not to speak of the multitudes of eager visitors, of which he complains not once only, as at the end of Sermon I I I . : 'But the evil craft of the day calls me away. For those people, whose coming has just been announced to me, oblige me to break off, rather than to finish, a discourse which is agreeable to me. I must go out to our guests, that no offices of that charity, of which we speak, be left unperformed.' And in Sermon LII., n. 7 : 'Scarcely is an hour of intermission left to me by the visitors who come.' It is indeed wonderful that the holy Father, distracted as he was by the cares of a numerous community, and of a multitude of affairs which pressed upon him, was enabled to compose those sermons full of wisdom so deep, and to preach them daily. For he himself declares that he did this, in Sermon XXII., n. 2 : ' It is a task, not without some labour and fatigue, for me to come daily to draw from the streams, the open streams of Scripture, to give to each of you according to his need.' For he preached these sermons on festival days, even when these were almost continuous, as appears from Sermon LXXXIIL, where he says that he has exhausted his strength in expounding one passage during three successive days. Furthermore, he delivered these sermons viva voce. Thus he says at the end of Sermon XLII. : ' My weakness, which you well know, does not permit me to go further.' And at the end of Sermon XLIV. : ' This suffices for the present. And, indeed, my weakness warns me to cease, as it frequently does.' 5. The Saint was wont to unite prayer to meditation to prepare the material of his sermons; nevertheless, out of the abundance and fertility of his mind he sometimes preached them when not yet written, as is proved by various passages. For in various parts of his sermons there are many passages which were evidently spoken ex tempore. Such is that, for example, in Sermon XXXVI., in which he chides those who were sleepy, and says : ' I thought that I should be able to say to you in one sermon what I had promised, of the two kinds of ignorance; and this I should have done, if this discourse did not seem already too long to such as are fastidious; for I perceive some yawning, and others even asleep. I do not wonder at this; the vigils of last night, which were indeed very long, are their excuse.' But there is no passage which affords proof so distinct that it was extemporaneous as one in Sermon IX., n* 6 : ' Another sense also occurs to me, which I had not thought of before, but which I cannot pass over.' Add to this that the Saint himself informs us in the following words that many of his sermons were written down by his disciples after he had delivered them : ' They have been written 4 PREFACE OF DOM JOHN MABILLON down as they were delivered, in the same manner as other sermons also, so that, with the exception of the style, anything that may have been lost is easily recovered ' (Sermon LIV., n. i). To this also relates what we read in Sermon LXXVIL, n. 2 : * Even though what I say were perchance put in writing, they would disdain to read them.' 6. St. Bernard used to preach these sermons invariably in the auditorium of the Brethren, and even the Novices (Sermon LXIIL, n. 6) were present, but not the 'Conversi,' who did not attend meetings of that kind at all. Wherefore he often asserts that his auditors were well skilled in the Scriptures ; and even more, he declares in his sermons that the ' rapid apprehension' of his hearers wrould 'anticipate' what he had to say (Sermons XV., n. 2; XVL, n. 1 ; XXXIX., n. 2). Again, as to the hour at which these sermons were delivered, it was sometimes in the morning, before the celebration of the Holy Eucharist (as was said with regard to other sermons in the preface to a former volume), and sometimes in the evening. It is apparent that it was sometimes in the morning, from two passages in which he brings the sermon to an end, because of their manual labour, and of the Divine office. Thus in Sermon I. towards the e n d : 'But the hour passes by,' he says, ' at which both our poverty and our settled rule summon us to the labour of our hands/ Still plainer in this respect is a passage in Sermon XLVII., which he, in fact, broke off because of the approach of the hour for the Divine office. As to the evening preaching, the testimony is clear in Sermon LXXL, ^ . 1 5 : 'But while I prolong this argument, the end of the day has come.' But enough has been said of these small matters, though here they are not altogether out of place. 7. St. Bernard had finished four-and-twenty sermons in the year 1137, in which year he set forth into Italy for the purpose of composing the schism. He returned thence in the following year, and at once betook himself to the work which had been interrupted, repeating Sermon XXIV. with another exordium and another peroration, by which has been occasioned a diversity of reading, which I shall treat of in its place. Sermons LXV. and LXVL, which begin from the exposition of that verse, ' Take us the little foxes' (ii. 15), the Saint composed against the heretics of Cologne, having been induced to do this by a letter written to him by Everwin, provost of Steinfeld, which letter he seems on that account to have placed at the head of those two sermons. Finally, Sermon LXXX. was delivered after the Council of Rheims in 1148, held in the presence of Pope Eugenius, in which was condemned the error of Gilbert de la Porree, Bishop of Poitiers, which Bernard himself refers to in that sermon. 8. In most MSS. the sermons are in number eighty-six, in a few eighty-seven; but this is either because they have repeated Sermon XXIV., as is the case with the Colbertine MS., or have divided another into two, as is done in our MS. of St. Germain. Of PREFACE OF DOM JOHN MABILLON 5 five MSS., which our brother, John Durand, consulted at my request, one has only eighty-six sermons ; but in another, bearing the number 665, is found a preface which no other MS. has, nor any edition. It begins thus : * Preface of the blessed Bernard, Abbot of Clairvaux, to the Song of Songs. The highest incentive which God has proposed to virtue is that of the delight of future blessedness; just as pleasure is the most powerful spur to wrong-doing which the devil has discovered. Of the truth of each of these sentiments we have a proof in Adam, the chief of the human race, since he was placed by the Lord God in a Paradise of pleasure, that he might thus be attracted to virtue, and enjoy eternal felicity in future ages.' The writer goes on to say that the loss of innocence by sin was followed by the loss of happiness, but that this loss was repaired by the melody and sweetness of the Psalms and Song of Songs. There is not a word in this preface which approaches the style or genius of Bernard. This preface is followed by eighty-three sermons only, under this title : * Exposition of the Song of Songs, by the blessed Bernard, Abbot of Clairvaux.' Another codex has, 'Bernard upon the Song of Songs,' and others, 'Treatise of the blessed Bernard, Abbot of Clairvaux, upon the Song of Songs.' One Colbertine MS. bears for title 'Treatise' instead of 'Sermons/ according to the ancient usage. But these are small details. That exposition breaks off in the third chapter of the Song of Songs at the verse, ' By night upon my bed I sought Him ' (rerse 1), from which point Gilbert of Hoiland, who was himself a Cistercian of England/ continued it to this verse of the fifth chapter, ' M y beloved is white and ruddy' (verse 10), in forty-eight sermons. H e was a man assuredly not much inferior to Bernard in the gravity and piety of his style. Death withdrew him from the world before he had carried his endeavour any further, as if he wrere indignant (if we are to believe Sixtus of Sienna) that the work of Bernard, which he had interrupted, should be continued a second time, and that Gilbert should dare even to wish to bring it to completion. Sixtus is mistaken when he says that this work was begun by Bernard ' in the last year of his life.' 9. Besides this exposition, Bernard dictated another and shorter one to William of St. Thierry, as William himself declares (' Life,' Bk. I., c. 12) ; but it will be a fitter place to speak of this when I shall refer to a brief comment on the two first chapters of the Canticles, drawn from St. Bernard's work. 10. In the first sermon of this longer exposition St. Bernard seems to hint that he had written commentaries on the Proverbs of Solomon, and on Ecclesiastes. He speaks thus (n. 2): ' For as to the words of Ecclesiastes, I believe that by the grace of God you are sufficiently instructed how to recognise and to contemn the vanity of this world. What as to the Proverbs ? Is not your life and conduct sufficiently formed and ruled on the teaching which they contain ? 1 Mabillon says 'of Ireland,' but he has apparently confused the Abbey of St. Mary at Swineshed with that of St. Mary at Dublin.—ED. 6 PREFACE OF DOM JOHN MABILLON Wherefore, having tasted of both of these, which you have accepted, nevertheless, as it were, two loaves offered from the chest of a friend, draw near and taste of the third also, and see if it be not still better.' But these words seem to signify only this, that the brethren of Clairvaux had been occupying themselves in reading the Proverbs and Ecclesiastes, and had adapted their conduct to the rules given in those books. Certainly Geoffrey, who has framed a list, sufficiently accurate, of the works of St. Bernard, has never attributed to him any commentaries on those books, nor has any contemporary author done so, as far as I am aware. Perhaps by that word ' of a friend ' St. Bernard meant to refer to some author of that time, such, for example, as Hugo of St. Victor, who composed nineteen homilies upon Ecclesiastes. n . I return to the sermons upon the Song of Songs. What Guerric, Abbot of Igny, and himself a most pious disciple of our holy Doctor, thought of these, he declares in his third sermon for the Festival of SS. Peter and Paul, in which- he says : * Our master, that interpreter of the Holy Spirit, resolved to explain to us the whole of that nuptial Song, and from those parts of his exposition which he put forth gave us good ground to hope that, if he had attained to treat of that passage, respecting which you inquire, " until the day break and the shadows flee away," he would bring those shadows into the light of knowledge. He shall tell us in the light that which was spoken, or shall be, in darkness.' These are the wrords of Guerric. SERMON I. ON THE TITLE OF THE BOOK : * THE SONG OF SONGS, WHICH IS SOLOMON'S.' O you, brethren, it is needful to speak of other truths than to those persons who are of the world; or, at least, to speak of them in a different manner. To them, if a preacher wishes to observe the order of teaching which the Apostle has prescribed (i Cor. iii. 2), milk, not meat, is to be given. H e himself teaches us, by his own example, to offer more solid nourishment to such as are spiritual, as when he says : ' We speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth, comparing spiritual things with spiritual.' And also : ' We speak wisdom among them that are perfect' (1 Cor. ii. 13, 6), such as I trust that you, my brethren, are ; unless it is in vain that you have been long occupied in the study of heavenly things, in meditating upon the law of God day and night, and in training yourselves to arrive at a knowledge of the truth. Prepare, therefore, to be nourished, not with milk, but with bread. There is bread in [these words of] Solomon, and that white and delicate; I mean in this book which is called ' The Song of Songs.' Let us set it before us, and break it according to our need. 2. As for the Book of Ecclesiastes, you are, if I do not mistake, 8 SERMONS ON THE SONG OF SONGS sufficiently well instructed by the grace of God to recognise and despise the vanity of the world, which is treated of therein. And what as to the Proverbs ? Is not your life and conduct sufficiently formed and ruled on the teaching which they contain ? Wherefore, having tasted of both of these, which you have accepted nevertheless as [it were loaves] offered from the chest of a friend, draw near and taste of this third loaf also, and see if it be not still better. 1 There are, then, two evils, which are the chief, if not the only ones which war against the soul, namely, the vain love of the world, and the excessive love of self. The two former books prescribe the remedy for each of these diseases, the former, by cutting away, with the sharp blade of discipline, whatever is corrupt in the character and superfluous in the desires of the flesh ; the latter, by wisely penetrating with the light of reason the deceitful glamour of this world's vanity, and distinguishing it accurately from that which is real and solid. Finally, Solomon prefers the fear of God and the keeping of His commandments to the pursuit of human knowledge and of worldly desires. And rightly so. For the first of these is the beginning of true wisdom, and the second its consummation ; if, that is to say, true and perfect wisdom consists only in departing from evil and doing good ; and if, also, no one is able perfectly to depart from evil without the fear of God, as no one is able to do good without the keeping of His commandments. 3. These two evils having then been put to flight by the reading of those two books, it is possible to approach fitly in order to listen to that sacred and sublime discourse, which being, as it were, the fruit of both [the previous books], is not to be listened to except by ears and hearts which are chastened and wise. For otherwise, unless the flesh has been mastered by discipline, and subjected to the spirit; unless the burdensome pomp of the world has been despised and cast away as insupportable, the heart is impure and unworthy to peruse the sacred Song. Just as the pure light is poured, vainly and to no purpose, upon blind eyes, or upon eyes that are closed, so * the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of G o d ' {1 Cor. ii. 14). For the holy spirit of discipline will flee from the -deceitful (Wisd. i. 5), that is, from one who leads an unregulated life. Never will He, who is the Spirit of Truth (John xiv. 17), have part or lot with the vain things of this world. What alliance can there be between the wisdom which is from above, and the wisdom of this world, which is foolishness with God (1 Cor. iii. 19), or the wisdom of the flesh, which is positively hostile to Him (Rom. viii. 7) ? But I think that the friend who comes to us from his journey 2 will have no reason to murmur against us, when he shall have taken of this third loaf. 1 There is a reference here to Luke xi. 5 : ' Friend, lend me three loaves.' Whether the words in the text imply that St. Bernard had made a comment upon those two books is discussed in the preface. 2 There is a question whether this ' friend' may not have been Bernard des Portes. See the discussion in Mabillon's preface.—ED. THE TITLE OF T H E BOOK 9 4. But who shall break it ? The Master of the house is present; do ye recognise the Lord in the breaking of bread. What other is there who is capable of doing this ? As for me, I am by no means so rash as to arrogate the task to myself. If you look to me, yet do so as looking for nothing from me. For I myself am one of those who await their meat from God ; I entreat with you, for the food of my soul, the sustenance of my spirit. Truly poor and needy as I am, I knock at the door of Him who openeth and no man shutteth (Rev. iii. 7), to obtain a knowledge of the deep mystery which lies hidden in this book. The eyes of all wait upon Thee, O Lord. Thy little children seek bread, and there is no one to break it for them. From Thy goodness we hope for that blessing. O most merciful One, break Thy bread to the hungering souls that are before T h e e ; by my hands, if Thou shalt see fit, but by the strength of Thy grace. 5. Make known to us, we entreat, by whom, and of whom this verse is said, and to whom it applies (Cant. i. 1). Why is it so abruptly spoken that it seems to plunge the hearer suddenly into the mid-action of a drama ? The speaker breaks forth suddenly, as if someone had spoken before, and as if a second character in the dialogue were then introduced, whosoever it may be, who makes this impassioned request. Then again, why is this unusual manner of speech made use of? But assuredly the very novelty and abruptness of this manner of beginning is not otherwise than very pleasing. Thus is it with the Holy Scripture ; it has an attractive countenance, which wins upon us at once, and carries us on to the reading of it, in such wise that, however laborious it may be to investigate the hidden mystery which it enfolds, that labour becomes pleasure, and however great the difficulty of the inquiry, it does not weary, inasmuch as the sweetness of the discourse recompenses and charms the inquirer. Who is there whom that commencing without commencement, that novel mode of speaking in a book so old, would not render attentive ? From this it appears that this work is not due to human powers, but was thus composed by the wisdom of the Holy Spirit; so that, however difficult it might be to understand, the searching out of its meaning might be a delightful task. 6. But are we'to pass over the title in silence ? By no means. We ought not to neglect the least iota, remembering that our Lord gave command that the fragments should be gathered together, that nothing might be lost (John vi. 12). The title is thus worded: 4 Here begins the Song of Songs, which is Solomon's.' Observe first that the name of Solomon, that is, the Peaceful,1 well becomes the beginning of this book, which commences by the sign of peace; and remark at the same time also that only the peaceful are invited to the consideration of this scripture, that is to say, those who have tranquil and peaceful souls, delivered from the agitation of evil passions, and the tumult of earthly cares. 1 n b V = Shel6m6h, the 'Peaceful One.'—ED. IO SERMONS ON THE SONG OF SONGS 7. Do not suppose either that it is without significance that the title of this scripture is not simply * a song,' but ' the Song of Songs.' I have read many songs or canticles in Scripture, and I do not remember one on which such a title as this was set. Israel sang to the Lord a song of praise, because they had escaped both from the sword and the slavery of Pharaoh, because they had been at once wonderfully delivered, and avenged, as by a twofold miracle, at the Red Sea. But yet their song was not styled ' Song of Songs.' The Scripture says, if I remember rightly, 'Then sang Moses and the children of Israel this song unto the Lord' (Exod. xv. 1). Deborah, too ; Judith, and the mother of Samuel, each gave utterance to a song. Not a few of the Prophets also raised their voices in song ; but we do not read that any of all these called his canticle ' the Song of Songs.' You will find, I believe, that each and all of these sang to celebrate some advantage conferred upon themselves or their people; for example, because they had gained a battle, escaped from some peril, obtained some wished-for benefit, or object of that kind. They uttered their songs, then, each for some object more or less private, that they might not be found ungrateful for the Divine benefits, as it is written : ' When Thou hast blessed him he will praise Thee ' (Ps. xlix. 18, Vulg.). But this King Solomon, who was endowed with admirable wisdom, exalted glory, overflowing wealth, and enjoyed profound peace, is known to have needed nothing, the attainment of which would have given him occasion to lift up his voice in this song of praise. There is no statement of Scripture anywhere which seems to suggest any such reason. 8. It was, then, by inspiration from above that he sang the praises of Christ and His Church, the grace of holy love, and the mysteries of everduring marriage ; and at the same time gave expression to the yearning aspirations of the holy soul. Thus he has composed a nuptial song or epithalamium, rejoicing in spirit, and in an ornamental and figurative style. Doubtless he veiled his face, as it were, after the example of Moses (Exod. iii. 6), which was perhaps not less resplendent [in the glory of its meaning] as also because in that day there were few, or none, who were capable of sustaining that glory if fully revealed. Therefore I conclude that this nuptial anthem is named ' Song of Songs ' for its surpassing excellence, just as H e who is above all is for that reason called alone ' King of Kings and Lord of Lords' (1 Tim. vi. 15). 9. If you consult your own experience, 1 after the victory which your faith has gained over the world, and at your coming forth from the abyss of misery and filthy bog, have not you also sung a new song unto the Lord, because He hath done wonderful things? Again, when H e has set your feet upon a rock, and ordered your goings, I 1 The MS. of Citeaux adds here : * The songs which we ought to sing through at each advance;' which seems to be an error. (Or is there a reference to the 4 Psalms of Degrees? 5 )—ED. T H E TITLE OF THE BOOK II think that then also in like manner, in thankfulness for the renewal of your life, a new song was put into your lips, even a thankfulness unto our God. And when, after your repentance for sin, H e has not only put away your offences, but has even promised you rewards also, has not that joy with which you were inspired by the hope of future blessings made you to ' sing in the ways of the Lord, that great is the glory of the Lord ' ? Again, when some one of you who had found some passage of Scripture to be hitherto obscure and impenetrable has gained a certain degree of light upon it, then, without doubt, in thankfulness for the nourishment of heavenly bread which he has received, he should delight the Divine ear with the voice of gladness and the sound of one that feasts. Finally, in the struggles and combats of every day, which are at no time wanting to those who live piously in Christ, whether it be with the flesh, the world, or the devil, so that the life of man upon the earth is a continual warfare, as you experience incessantly in your own selves, it is needful day by day to raise new songs of thanksgiving for the victories which you gain. As often as temptation is overcome, vicious inclination restrained, imminent danger escaped, a snare of the tempter discovered, or some ancient and inveterate fault of the soul healed perfectly and once for all, or as often as some special favour long desired and frequently besought from God is at length obtained from Him, ought we not so often, according to the prophet's saying, to make the voice of joy and praise resound, thanksgiving, and the voice of melody (Is. li. 3), and at each of His benefits let God be praised in His gifts ? Otherwise, he shall be counted as ungrateful in the day of judgment who is not able to say unto G o d : Thy statutes have been my songs in the house of my pilgrimage (Ps. cxix. 54). 10. I imagine that you have yourselves already noticed that in the psalter we have psalms called not ' Songs of Songs/ but songs or psalms 'of degrees' (Pss. cxx.-cxxxiv.) ' because in the measure that you make progress in the spiritual life, according to the steps upward that each makes in his heart, he ought to render songs to the praise and glory of Him who is the inspirer of them all. I do not see how in any other manner that verse could be accomplished : The voice of rejoicing and salvation is in the dwellings of the righteous (Ps. cxviii. 15), or that beautiful and salutary exhortation of the Apostle : Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your hearts to the Lord (Eph. v. 19). n . But there is a canticle which, by its excellence and incomparable sweetness, rightly surpasses those which I have mentioned and all others, if there be any, and this I may call * the Song of Songs,' seeing that it is itself the fruit of all others. That canticle the anointing of grace alone teaches, and experience only makes the soul to be familiar with it. Those who have had experience of it know it well; let those who have not had that happiness earnestly desire, not to know it, but to experience it. It is not a cry from the 12 SERMONS ON THE SONG OF SONGS mouth, but the gladness of the heart; not the sounding of the lips, but the impulse and emotion of joys within ; not a concert of words, but of wills moving in harmony. It is not heard without, nor does it make a sound in public. Only she who sings, and H e in whose honour it is sung, that is the Bridegroom and the Bride, hear the accents of that song. It is a nuptial song, which is expressive of the chaste and sweet emotions of souls, the entire conformity of character, the blending of affections in mutual charity. 12. But for the rest, this song is not to be sung or to be understood by a soul which is as yet a neophyte in the infancy of its virtue, and but newly turned from the world. It belongs to the advanced and instructed soul, which, by the progress in grace made by it through the power of God, has grown as far as to reach a perfect age, and, as it were, to have become marriageable (remember that I speak not of years, but of virtues), and fit for the nuptials with its heavenly spouse, such as will be more fully described in its place. But the hour is passing, at which both our poverty and the precept of our rule call us forth to the labour of our hands. To-morrow we will continue in the name of God what we had entered upon with respect to the opening verse, since the sermon of to-day has furnished the explication of the title. SERMON II. OF THE INCARNATION OF CHRIST, WHICH WAS ANNOUNCED BY T H E PATRIARCHS AND PROPHETS, AND ARDENTLY EXPECTED BY THEM. ' Let Him kiss me zvith the kisses of His mouth.''—Cant. i. I. T H I N K very often of the deep earnestness and ardour with which the ancient Fathers desired the presence of Christ in the Flesh, and I am touched with a feeling of extreme grief and shame in myself, I am scarcely able even now to restrain my tears, so much am I ashamed of the coldness and insensibility of the unhappy times in which we live. Who is there among us that feels joy as great at the actual showing forth of this wonder of grace, as the desire and longing wherewith the ancient saints were fired at the promise only of so great a thing ? How many there are who will rejoice at that Festival of His Birth, which we are soon about to celebrate! But would that their rejoicings were, not on account of vain things, but really on account of His Birth ! This verse seems, then, to me to breathe the ardent desire and pious impatience of those great men. T H E INCARNATION OF CHRIST 13 The little band of those who then were animated by the Holy Spirit felt in advance how great would be the grace which would be diffused upon those Divine Lips. Therefore it was that speaking in the ardour of that desire, wherewith their heart was fired, they said these words, passionately wishing not to be deprived of happiness so great. 2. For each of these saintly souls would, as it were, say : To what end do these wordy 1 utterances from the mouths of the prophets come to me ? Let Him rather who is fair beyond the sons of men, let Him come to me with the touch of His Lips. Not now do I listen to Moses: he has become slow of speech to me, and of a slow tongue (Exod. iv. 10). The lips of Isaiah are impure (Is. vi. 5). Jeremiah knows not how to speak, for he is a child (Jer. i. 6) ; yea, all the prophets are speechless. Let Him of whom they bear witness, let Him speak Himself to me. Let Him speak to me no longer in them or by their means, for their words are as a darkening cloud in the air of heaven ; but let Him whose presence is full of grace, whose teaching shall become in me a fountain of water springing up into eternal life (John iv. 14), let Him come to me with the touch of His Lips. Shall not He whom the Father hath anointed with the oil of gladness above His fellows (Ps. xlv. 8), pour upon me from His fulness a more abounding grace, if H e shall indeed deign to do this ? H e it is whose speech, living and powerful, is to me as a kiss, and that not the mere meeting of the lips, which ofttimes is but a deceptive sign of peace in the heart, but rather the imparting of joys, the revealing of things hidden, and a certain wonderful, intimate, and wholly ineffable mingling of the heavenly light which enlightens the soul, and the soul which is illuminated by it. For he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit (1 Cor. vi. 17). Rightly, then, do I receive neither visions nor dreams; I turn away from parables and metaphors ; even angelic glories themselves I hold in disdain. For even these Jesus, who is mine, by His fairness and His attractiveness to my soul, far surpasses. Of no other, then, whether angel nor man, but of Him alone do I make his entreaty. Yet I have not the presumption to require to be kissed with His mouth. That is the unique privilege and incommunicable felicity of the Man whom the Word has assumed to Himself in the incarnation. My petition is more humble : and this is a privilege common to all who are able to say, Of His fulness have we all received (John i. 16). 3. Observe : It is the Word becoming Incarnate, who is the Mouth who gives the kiss. It is the Human Nature which is assumed which receives it. The kiss, which is perfected equally by Him who gives and Him who receives it, is that Person constituted of each nature, the Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ 1 Seminiverbia, i.e.,