b .If.. -TftV y. gKJRi'^ »*¦,> ::iPi r*i'ii: ?m'"^'!:Mi4 asr^fl IS-'V.i r imi ¦-rc: YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY SERMONS O N T H E Following SUBJECTS, VIZ. I. Friendship. n. GRATiTaDE to God. in. Mercy. IV. Pride. V. Sinful Anger. VI. The Advantages of EarlyPiety. VII. The Unsearchableness of God's Ways, and the Benefits cf Afflic tive Providence. By MARY DEVERELL. B R I S "T O L: Printed and fold by S. FARLEY, in Caflle-Gveen : Alfo fold by T. Cadbll, B. Becke.t, Bookfellers; Frede rick and Bally, Batti; J. Bbnce, Wotton-Under-Edge ; G. Harris, Glccefier ; Carnan and Newbery, St. Paul's Ctiurch-yard, London. YALE t>4n1774- A N APOLOGY To the PUBLIC. WH E N a female wtiter pre- fumes to obtrude npoii the world the produdions of her leifure hours, under the title of SermonSy it may poflibly be expected that fome excufe fhould bc made for {o daring an ufurpation of the facred province. It is therefore with the flridiefl: truth aflerted, that a ftrange con currence of circumftances has on this occaflon, united to uflier into the world thofe liianufcripts, which, like many others tha|t make their appearance in print, were not de- A 2 flgned, ( iv ) flgned, at the time they were pen ned, for the infpedlion of the public. — Thefe circumftances, as they would many of them refled: 'on private cha- racSters, can with no propriety be taken notice of; and thofe which flowed from the feelings of generoflty and the glow of friendfliip,il am moft unwillingly forced to fupprefs, as the recital of them yvould be too popious for this writing.^ In cpmpjjment, however, to the opinion of forpe re- Ipedable chara<5lers among tl>e clergy, I would both readily and gladly have altered the title of Sermons y to that of .EJaysy RefieEiionSy or any, other which might have been deemed more proper, as lefs afluming, than the prefent. But as thofe gentlemen could not, from the form and na ture of the compofitions, allow the equal propriety of any other title; and as my firft fubfcribcrs would 'not relinquifli their elairp to the pub lication ( V ) licatioii Urider the identical deiidftii- nationj fdr Which they had giv^eh in thfeir iiariies, I have, for their Satis- faSiioHi retained it. But it is , not barely for the title of thefe flieets, rior yet for their appear- ^ce in print, that I fliall very pof libly have the rnisfortune to incur ccnfiire, but even for writing any thing in the form of a ferious and re ligious difcourfe. In this however, I have the confolation to think that I am by no means Angular, and I have only to regret that 1 am fo very un equal to , thofe diftinguiflied patterns of every female excellence, who have ventured to fubmit their productions, in this way, to the perufal of the public. — But how little lenity foever I. may exped: to meet with from the world . in general; from the clergy, tp wbgni I may te fuppofed to have given ( vi ) given moft offence, as having invade.d their peculiar fundion, I flatter my felf I fliall receive" a lefs rigorous fen- tence ; convinced, as I am by ex perience, of the generoflty, candour, and benevolence, which charaderize their profeflion. And furely if it be allowed, as it ufually is, that if our amufements are but innocent, it is alone fufiicient to render them ex- cufeable ; it would be ^ hard cafe indeed, if thofe that habituate the mind to ferious and religious con templations, are, merely upon that account, to be deemed criminal, or yet ridiculous. But no fober pqrfon, I am perfwaded,' will condemn me, if I. have incurred no heavier charge, than; that of devoting my leifure hours to an employment of this nature. As I wrote only in a manner to pleafe myfelf, fcholaftic debates, or fcientifical divinity, could not be fup pofed ( vu ) pofed to have afforded me that ferene delight I fought, had inclination led me to it. But there is no 'merit in declining what I am in no refped: capable of- Myfterious ¦ points in Theology ^re left to the erudition of the fchools;, and perhaps thofe deep controverfial fubjeds would have been as little pleafing, or improving, to the generality of my fex, as they are to her whofe foul, as PopE de fcribes his hidiansy " Proud Science never taught to ftray, ' " Far as the Solar Walk, or Milky-way. ' I .' ' ' ' The fubjeds I have treated of are fuch as occurred to my mind from obfervation on the facred oracles, without knowing at the time of writing, they had been treated of by much abler pens : by one lefs advan- tageoufly circumftanced, or lefs in ftruded' in the arts' of literature, they could fcarcely be, a^ my educa tion ( viii ) tion haibeerias coi*iried^ as rii jr life has' been 'dbmeftic; i -ith'erefore frdrii at juft fenfe t^f thefe difadvantag^si ds Well as of thena'rrov^nfefs of iny iiWd' caipacity, ^ I ^ have ri'ot prefurried t& lay thefe 'difdourfes before tht priblik:^ 'till ithej^ bad firft undergone a ^re- vifal frd'nS'pFoper judges?,- left I fliopld' inciit? that woe denounced by thC Prophet againft thofe that are wife iri their ei'mn- ejfesy. and frudent in ¦ "their own fi-ght. And tb thofe Reverend Gentlemen \vho have honour'd me with their ^af)prol?atioh, afliftance and advice, on this occafion; and like- wife to all. ethers, who ih^ve corope- r^ated to facilitate . and promote i the publication J :;|>y a variety of the jjipft friendly f offices; I , take this opr- poftunity to, make riiy moft grateful and /fincere acknowledgments. The delay, of the, publication fo long beyond .my wiflies, or inten tions. ( ix ) tions, has been occafioned by nume rous difappointments, fo various ^nd cogent, that I flatter i^yfelf, if known, would plead fome ejxcufe, for me with every perfon pf candour^ gs the difpenfations of Providence, by ficknefs and other misfortunes, retarded for a tedious time the henevplent qf- fices of thofe good Divines engaged in my favour. It would "be imper tinence to trouble my readers with a detail of other circumftances, as re- miffnefs or negled had no fliare in therii ; and they confifted wholly of a long chain of unfortunate and inter vening accidents, equally out of my power to forefee dr prevent; otherwife thefe manufcripts would have been fome time fince committed to the prefs. And if any of thofe produdions which prbbted ft'bin \Ii ' ar^ intided to more peculiar lenity, it is certainly thofe that are forced from it in felf-vindication, for which reafbri 'Mtrcy ' is 'lloped for " ¦' 'y from ( ^ ) from the dread courts of criticifm. — But however I may bc condemned^ or acquitted at a human' tribunal, Omnipotence is not reftrained, and may do good by the weakeft inftru ment : After all, the pubHc have an undoubted right to pafs what judg ment they pleafe on the feeble efforts in divinity, made Bjy their Obedient humble Servant^ Mary Deverell. Nails WORTH, Ghcefterfhire^ Jan. 28, 1774. SERMON I. I Samuel xviii. 3, 4. Tfhen fonathan and David made a covetia7it, becaufe he loved him as his owjifoid. And Jonathan flripped himfelf of the 7'ohe that ivas upon him, and gave it to David, atid his garments, even to his fword, and to his bo-io, and to his girdle . ^' g""^ H E celebrated love and difinterefted \_ friendftiip of Jonathan and David, feem to have flowed, not meerly from that noble warmth and fimilarity of foul, for Vv^hich they were fo peculiarly diftinguiilled, but from a ftill higher principle. For in fcripture it appears that the affeftion, which Jonathan conceived for David, com menced at a very early period,, and, as it fliould feem, before he could poflibly have given fuch proofs of fuperior worth, as might juftify a wife Prince, in making a facred co venant of friendfliip with a poor Shepherd. He therefore feems to have been led to it by a divine impulfe. For in the firft verfe of this chapter we are told, that // came to paf} B wbeti ( 2 ) 'wheii he had made an end of fpeaking unto Saul, (and of giving him an account of his parentage and kindred) fhat the foul of Jona than ivas knit unto the foul of David, and that fonathan loved him as his own foul. From this time one fpirit feemed to animate both j and the flame which was kindled in the breaft of Jonathan, was lighted up' as vigo- roufly in that of David j , nor could all Ifrael produce fucli another pair of friends.. Whether David at this time knew that he was anointed by Samuel to be fuc- ceffor'to Saul, is not clear from fcripture: nor does it appear. that Jonathan, was ap- prifed of it. However, when afterwards he became, fully acquaintpd with; it, Jie was not, ,dn that account, in