YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Gift of CHAUNCEY BREWSTER TINKER YALE 1899 THE ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, R.A. VOL. I MACMILLAN AND CO., Limited LONDON • BOMBAY ¦ CALCUTTA MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN COMPANY NEW YORK • BOSTON • CHICAGO ATLANTA • SAN FKANCISCO THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, Ltd. TORONTO 'moru'&lal&er&'-fu. <*o. J'.Jt&lSTurner 9UI. cvbtivca^ of 23 ^cuhMuL -by iUrrL^eAj. ^JVatioivcUy JfaMeru THE ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, R.A. BY W. G. RAWLINSON AUTHOR OF " TURNER'S LIBER STUDIORUM, A DESCRIPTION AND A CATALOGUE " VOL. I LINE ENGRA VINGS ON COPPER, 1794— 1839 MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED ST. MAETIN'S STEEET, LONDON 1908 CHISWICK PRESS : CHARLES WHITTINGHAM AND CO. TOOKS COURT, CHANCERY LANE, LONDON. CONTENTS. PAGE Portrait of J. M. W. Turner, E.A., at the age of 23 To face Title. Preface vii Introduction ......... ix Explanatory Notes lxxv Complete List of Engravings after Turner . . lxxxv Catalogue 1 Index 175 PREFACE I have endeavoured in this Catalogue to give as com plete information as my present knowledge permits, con cerning the entire engraved work of J. M. W. Turner, R.A. But as that consists of nearly nine hundred examples, it will be readily seen that absolute accuracy in all details is hardly to be hoped for. I do not think that many engravings after Turner will be discovered which are not included here, but the publication of this Catalogue will probably bring to light collections at present unknown to me, containing certainly many Trial Proofs, and very possibly some ' States,' which I have never seen. A second volume is in preparation, and a third may perhaps be required ; a General Index will be given at the end. These, with the ' Catalogue of the Liber Studiorum ' (a revised edition of which was published in 1906), will embrace the whole engraved work of Turner executed during his lifetime and the period immediately following his death. I have not attempted any illustrations. None of the reproductions of Turner's Line Engravings which I have yet seen have appeared to me to give any true sense of their luminousness and delicacy; nor have the Mezzo tints fared much better. More satisfactory results might probably be obtained by photogravures of the same dimensions as the originals, but the size no less than the cost would be prohibitive. PREFACE. It is my pleasant duty to thank many friends for their help in what, if it is an arduous task, is also a labour of love. To Mr. D. C. Lathbury I am indebted not only for sound criticism, but also for a sometimes-needed spur; Mr. Sidney Colvin's experienced advice has been from time to time of great service; Mr. C. F. Bell, of the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, Mr. H. S. Theobald, K.C., Mr. A. J. Finberg, Mr. C. Mallord Turner, and Mr. Francis Bullard, of Boston, U.S.A., have all con tributed information, and Mr. Edward Dillon's aid has again been invaluable. Mr. Frank Short, A.R.A. — whose knowledge of all engraving processes, past and present, is even greater than was Turner's — has explained many difficult technical points, and has very kindly read the proofs of that portion of the Introduction which deals with technique. Mr. Whitman of the British Museum has aided in the solution of some puzzling problems of detail, Mr. W- Ward, of Richmond, has supplied useful particulars of engravings which from time to time have passed through his hands, Mr. Algernon Graves, whose firm was so long connected with Turner, has cleared up some obscure questions relating to the later engravings, and Messrs. Agnew have kindly furnished me with the latest particulars of recent changes in the ownership of important drawings. My thanks are also due to Mr. Ruskin's Executors and to his publisher, Mr. George Allen, for their permission to quote from his writings. W. G. Rawlinson. London. October, 1908. THE ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, R.A. INTRODUCTION. Turner is largely known to the world through his engrav ings; much of his most important work was done for the engraver, and under his influence the translation of land scape into black-and-white was carried to a higher point than it had ever before reached. Probably no painter before him so well understood the methods, the capa bilities, and the limitations of engraving; certainly none ever devoted an equal amount of time and care to the reproduction of his works. From his boyhood to his latest years Turner was con- Turner's nected with this branch of art. At nine years old his draw- connection ings, exposed in the shop window of his father the barber, with in Maiden Lane, attracted the attention of the customers enSravmS- (among whom was the painter Stothard), and it was de cided that the boy should be brought up as an artist. His first training probably was in the workshop of John Kaphael Smith, the great mezzotint engraver, who was also a printseller. Here Turner and his fellow apprentice Girtin were employed chiefly in colouring the aquatint and mezzotint plates then so much in vogue, but there is no doubt that in Smith's work-room he also acquired a general knowledge of engraving processes, which stood i. ix h INTRODUCTION TO THE him in good stead throughout his life. When, a few years later, he commenced his famous 'Liber Studiorum,' not only was he able to execute in a masterly way the foundation etchings which his engravers required, but dared not themselves attempt, but also, with his own hand, he completed in mezzotint eleven of the finest plates. His corrections and instructions on the trial proofs which from time to time his engravers submitted to him, also show that from the first he was familiar with their terms and methods. As will be seen hereafter, these instructions, in which he almost invariably took pains to explain his reasons for the alterations which he required, educated the artists who worked under him as no engravers had ever been educated before. And the gain was a double one. Not only were they taught by Turner, but, in teaching and correcting them, he himself learned how most effectively to draw with a view to trans lation into black-and-white. Landscape Turner was born in 1775, at which time William a^thTend Woollett stood at the head of all landscape engravers. of the XVIII His fine interpretations of the pictures of Claude, Poussin, '' u,y and Wilson had gained him a high reputation, not only in England, but throughout the Continent. He died in 1785, but his influence dominated the English school of engraving at the end of the eighteenth and the beginning of the nineteenth century. His work was always strong and masterly, although it has not the delicacy nor especi ally the luminousness of the men who were to succeed him. From the middle to the end of the eighteenth century Mezzotint engraving was at its zenith in England, in the hands of McArdell, Valentine Green, John Eaphael Smith, and other well known artists. But it was as yet almost confined to portraiture, and although, as will be seen, Turner on several occasions successfully employed it for ENGRA VED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. xi landscape — notably in his ' Liber Studiorum ' and ' Eivers of England ' — yet throughout his life, his works, large and small, were reproduced mainly in Line Engraving. Had the commercial conditions been equal, he would probably have employed Mezzotint more frequently, as its breadth of treatment lends itself in many ways to the expression of some of the most characteristic features of his art. But the comparatively small number of good impressions which the process yields was doubtless practically fatal to its general use, especially for the book illustrations which form so large a part of Turner's work in black-and-white. He was in fact compelled from the first to accept Line Engraving as his method, and it will be seen how in the hands of the able men who worked under his influence and direction, it gradually advanced in brilliance and dis tinction, until it reached the high point of ' The Southern Coast,' the ' Bichmondshire,' the 'England and Wales,' ' Eogers's Poems ' and ' Italy,' ' The Eivers of France,' and some of the large plates produced during his later years. As the great majority of the works which will be de scribed in this Catalogue were executed in one or other of the two processes just mentioned, it may be useful here to describe their widely differing methods.1 ' Line Engraving ' is so designated because its effects are Method of primarily obtained by lines cut on the surface of a metal Line En- plate by a tool called the burin or graver. The early masters of the art — Durer, Lucas van Leyden, and the first Italian engravers — worked in what is now known as * pure line,' i.e., they actually cut with their own hands every stroke or dot which appears on the prints bearing 1 I am deeply indebted to Mr. Prank Short, A.R. A., who has most kindly revised these notes, and given me information on many technical points, which could only have been afforded by an artist familiar with every kind of black-and-white work. INTRODUCTION TO THE their names. But in the seventeenth century (or possibly before) it was discovered that the earlier stages of this necessarily slow and laborious process could be far more quickly and easily executed by the method known as • Engravers' Etching,' and for the last 250 years or more, the usual procedure of the line engraver has been as follows : (1) An accurate outline-copy of the picture to be engraved, reduced to the exact size of the engraving re quired, is made (generally by the engraver but sometimes for him) in pencil or crayon on smooth paper. Accuracy in the reduction is obtained by dividing the picture itself by cross threads into small squares of from one to two or three inches each, each of which is numbered; these squares and numbers are then drawn to the smaller scale on the paper of the copy, and the drawing is completed, square by square, until it exactly corresponds (but on its smaller scale) with the picture. This copy, or a tracing of it, is now rolled by a press over a plate of hammered copper or steel, on which a thin layer of wax has pre viously been laid, and by this means every line or touch on the copy is imprinted on the surface of the wax. The plate is now ready for engraving. (2) The engraver with his ' point ' — a tool which is simply a large needle with a steel or diamond tip — then goes over the design which he sees before him imprinted on the wax, the point as it advances removing the wax and leaving the engraver's lines showing as bare, shining metal below. Some are only outlines, but most are in sets of lines in varying directions, by which means ' tone ' is obtained. (3) The plate is then immersed in a bath of diluted nitric acid, which eats into these lines (now unprotected by wax), and in so doing reproduces them on the surface of the plate, all the rest of which remains protected by its covering of wax. The finer lines need but a very short ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xiii exposure to the acid, and have quickly again to be covered with wax — ' stopped out ' as it is termed — but the dark ones, in proportion to their darkness, require many repetitions of the bath, each successive stage being ' stopped out ' with wax as it is completed. This process — which is the distinguishing feature of all Etching — is termed ' biting-in.' It needs extreme skill on the part of the operator, as the gradations in the strength of the lines demand the greatest judgement and delicacy in manipulation, and there is moreover always a risk of the acid penetrating on to the metal where it is not intended, should the wax not have been properly laid. Such special aptitude does it require, that it was formerly often entrusted to some engraver known to be expert at it, and his name, with the word ' Aquafortis ' after, may not unfrequently be seen on the early stages of a line en graving. Even the burin work which comes after was sometimes 'bitten-in' to enforce it. This is peculiarly hazardous, as only the most delicate film of wax can be laid over an already engraved plate. The late Mr. Goodall, E.A., whose father executed some of Turner's large engravings and the greater part of his finest vignettes, told me that he well remembered in his early days what anxious times for the family ' biting-in days ' were. An impression of a line engraving taken at this stage is usually called the ' Open ' or ' Preliminary ' Etching. These are generally hard and monotonous in effect, being in fact mainly very skilful tracings, intended as a foundation for subsequent work. They are never ' free,' but are drawn with the needle resting against a ' straight edge.' They must not be confounded with the altogether higher productions of the great Painter-Etchers, such as Eembrandt and his successors, who draw with the needle on the wax with a free hand, just as they would paint an oil or water-colour picture with the brush. xiv INTRODUCTION TO THE (4) The preliminary etching completed, the real engrav ing of the plate begins. This is accomplished mainly with two instruments, the more important of which is the burin or graver, and the other the ' dry-point.' The burin is a steel tool about five inches long, tapering to a triangular point and set in a hollow, semicircular, wooden cap. With this cap resting against the palm of his hand, the engraver pushes the point of tbe burin before him through the lines already bitten by the acid on the plate, every stroke cutting away before it a minute shaving or fragment of metal. By going over the etched lines in this way again and again, they are gradually deepened (and consequently darkened) as required; cross-lines, dots, hatchings, and shadings are also added where necessary. The lighter parts of an engraving — such as the clouds — are seldom etched, but are usually executed entirely with the burin or the ' dry-point.' The latter is virtually an etching needle, but it is used without acid, hence its name. It is required for the most delicate lines of all, such as those of the sky, the reflections on water, etc. In Turner's vignette engravings it was extensively employed. A tool called a 'burnisher' is also needed. This is a highly polished piece of steel of an oval section tapering to a point ; it is used to rub down and so lighten lines, or parts of lines, which may be too dark. Formerly, nearly, if not the whole of the sky was executed either with the burin or dry-point, involving a very great amount of labour over the large open spaces, but early in the last century this labour was much reduced by the invention of the ingenious 'ruling machine.' This produces by mechanical means, the fine close, parallel lines by which so much of the sky is usually represented. It was employed on many of Turner's later engravings. Although machine ruling is often fairly effective, it need hardly be said that it always misses the sensitiveness and refinement of a skilful engraver's hand. ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. xv The ' human element ' in any work of art can never be eliminated without some sacrifice. The tone, quality, and colour of a line engraving mainly depend upon the burin or dry-point work. Occa sionally, in a master's hand — for example in Middiman's High Street, Oxford, and especially in the late Mr. Barlow's Vintage at Macon, both prints after Turner — the pre liminary etching is so strong and so artistic as to be often preferred to the finished plate : this however rarely happens. The great feature of Turner's line engravers from Pye's time onwards was the skill they displayed in continually changing the direction of their sets of lines, in order to express changing form in similar tones; yet not doing it suddenly, but imperceptibly, so as to avoid its being unduly noticeable. With all the saving which etching effects in the earlier stages, the labour of engraving a plate in line is enormous, and the work itself very hard and tedious. The large prints after Turner and other painters of his time occu pied never less than two years each in execution, and often more, and the cost and delay which this involved was doubtless one of the causes which led to the disuse into which the art has now fallen. Turning now to Mezzotint, we find the procedure very Method of different. It may be said that the fundamental distinction JJ^^1"* between theMezzotinter and all other engravers — whether in Line, Etching or Stipple — lies in the fact that whilst each of the latter, in his own way, produces his effects by gradually darkening a white surface with black lines, hatchings, or dots, the former starts with a black surface, which he, as gradually, lightens. In a word, he works from dark to light, and they from light to dark. The mezzotinter, like the line engraver, first makes an accurately-reduced copy of the picture which he has to engrave. He next proceeds to roughen the entire sur- engraving. INTRODUCTION TO THE face of his copper or steel plate by means of a tool known as a ' rocker.' This resembles a chisel, the edge of which is a segment of a circle (like the rocker of a cradle) consisting of very fine sharp teeth, not unlike a tooth- comb. By continually working this backwards, forwards, and across the plate, in every direction and at all possible angles, an immense number of infinitely minute points are raised all over its surface, so that if it were then inked and a sheet of white paper rolled over it, the paper would come from the press perfectly black. This rough ening process is called ' laying the ground.' The engraver next divides the ' grounded ' plate into small squares, by ruling over it in soft chalk or pencil, lines exactly corresponding with those on his copy; he then traces, lightly but with extreme accuracy, on the surface of the metal, the leading outlines of his subject. Sometimes these outlines are etched, i.e., 'bitten-in,' with acid, before the mezzotint ground is laid — as for example in the plates of Turner's ' Liber Studiorum ' — but this is rarely done. As has just been said, the oopper-plate at this stage would print absolutely black. Accordingly, the engraver's task is now, by gradually scraping away the innumerable minute raised points on the copper, to reduce that abso lute blackness through varying gradations corresponding to the varying Bhades on the picture, until he reaches the highest lights, where the points have to be completely removed. The metal in these places, being now once more perfectly smooth, prints pure white; in the dark parts of the print, the points have been left by the engraver so proportionately high as to catch more or less ink as may be necessary. For removing the points and roughnesses on the copper, the engraver uses two or three tools of different sizes known as ' scrapers,' and for polishing the plate for the high lights, a 'burnisher.' It may be imagined how ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xvii minute and delicate are all the intermediate stages be tween absolute black and absolute white, and what skill is required thus entirely to reverse in engraving the procedure by which the picture or drawing was originally produced. In all methods of engraving, whether by the scraping The Print- and burnishing of Mezzotint as just described, or by Line savings" Engraving as previously explained, the artist requires from time to time to see the effect in black and white of his work, which is visible to him only as a gleaming picture on the face of the metal. For that purpose what are termed ' Trial ' or ' Progressive ' Proofs are taken at various stages by the plate-printer. He first covers the plate with ink of a greasy nature, which he applies with a soft leather pad. Much of this ink is then wiped off with a soft, open-textured, linen cloth made for the pur pose, but some is of course left in the lines of the line- engraving plate or adhering to the minute points on the mezzotint. Great judgement and experience are required for this ' wiping ' as it is termed, especially in mezzotint plates, as according to the amount of ink left in the various parts of the metal, the darkness or lightness of the corresponding part of the impression will be largely affected. After wiping, the plate is laid face upwards on the bed of the press, and a damped sheet of plate-paper is forced into close contact with it,bybeing passed under a revolving roller. Great pressure is used, and several thicknesses of blanket are interposed between the paper and the roller. The elasticity of the blanket actually moulds the damp paper into the hollows on the plate. In addition, the ink on its surface is picked up. The distinctions between the various impressions which succeed one another will be dealt with, along with similar technical questions, in the Explanatory Notes which precede the Catalogue. INTRODUCTION TO THE The first en- The earliest engravings after Turner are to be found f^ngs in ' The Copper-Plate Magazine ' (afterwards called ' The Turner. Itinerant'), one of the many small illustrated serials which had come into vogue at the end of the eighteenth century. Over the previous generation, the stately clas sical landscapes of Claude Lorraine and Gaspar Poussin had held sway, but in England a new, and what may be termed a 'romantic,' interest had lately arisen in the natural scenery of the country, in its ancient Gothic cathedrals, in the remains of its many mediaeval castles, and its beautiful ruined abbeys. A school of painters, chiefly in water-colours — ' topographical draftsmen ' they were usually called — devoted themselves to the represen tation of such subjects. Of these Paul Sandby E.A., John Cozens, Thomas Hearne, and William Dayes were the leaders, while Malton, Eooker, De Loutherbourg and others were prominent members. Their work was char acterized by great simplicity of design, and their colour ing limited to the pale tints familiar to all students of the Early English school; but this simple style and unpretending colouring were generally accompanied by careful draughtsmanship and skilful composition; often also by true poetic feeling. They were largely occupied in supplying designs for books illustrating the scenery and antiquities of Great Britain, which were at this time in great request. ' The Copper -Plate Magazine ' was the joint venture of John Walker, the engraver of most of the plates, and Harrison and Co., a city firm of publishers. Many of the artists named above were employed on it, together with not a few amateurs; the latter (as now in cricket) were amusingly distinguished by an 'Esq.' after their names. Turner received his first commission in 1793. He was then eighteen, and had been for three years a student and a regular exhibitor at the Eoyal Academy, where his ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xix water-colours had already attracted considerable notice. He started at once to make drawings for the work, hi8 remuneration, it is said, being fixed at the rate of two guineas for each plate, with a small allowance for travel ling expenses — it being stipulated that every drawing should be made on the spot. Between 1793 and 1798, while engaged on this and similar work, he went west as far as Swansea; north, as far as Carlisle; east, as far as Ely; and south, as far as Eochester. He travelled mostly on foot, with his drawing materials and his scanty wardrobe slung in a bundle over his shoulder, and usually carrying his fishing-rod. Turner was a keen angler and throughout his life he rarely lost an opportunity of intro ducing a fisherman whenever he painted any form of water. Even in later life, when his figures were treated merely as points of light, colour, or composition, and were usually very carelessly drawn, the angler was always an exception, and he will be found invariably de picted in some characteristic attitude which a fisherman will at once recognize. Alaric Watts, a contemporary, says of him : 1 " He walked twenty to twenty-five miles a day, sketching rapidly on his way all striking pieces of composition, and marking effects with a power that daguerreotyped them in his mind. There were few moving phenomena in clonds and shadows that he did not indelibly fix in his memory, though he might not call them into requisition until years after wards." Walker was a poor engraver. Only a few of Turner's drawings for the ' Copper-Plate Magazine ' have survived, and most of these have greatly faded, but the one or two which are still unimpaired show that the translator has entirely failed to render the charm of these early works. No one seeing the prints would imagine from them the 1 ' Liber Fluviorum,' 1857, preface. INTRODUCTION TO THE delicate beauty of the pale blues, greens, and browns of the originals, nor the dainty precision of the drawing of the figures — so different from those of Turner's later years ! Yet although the prints are small and poorly engraved, they are far from unattractive. Their old-world look gives no doubt a fairly accurate and often an artistic record of an England which must then have been almost everywhere picturesque — Sheffield and Birmingham even included. From 1794 to 1798 Turner continued to supply occa sional illustrations to magazines and various topograph ical works, but his delicate and careful drawings were reproduced mostly by inferior craftsmen, and it was not until 1799 that he became associated with an engraver worthy of his then fast rising reputation. The 'Oxford In that year he was commissioned by the University BaSre TtoI'' °* Oxford to supply the heading to the official broadsheet Almanack of the University.1 For more than a century the Oxford Almanacks had been embellished with a repre sentation of the interior or exterior of some building con nected with the University or the City, or of some view in the immediate environs, the drawings for which had been furnished by the leading water-colour artists of the day. From 1799 to 1811 these, with one exception, were supplied by Turner, but one of his designs, The Quad rangle of Balliol College, was considered unsatisfactory by the authorities, the Master of the College having objected that the sunlight could not fall on the buildings in the way in which it had been represented by Turner. As Turner would doubtless have strongly objected to make any alteration on such grounds, and the drawing 1 An interesting and exhaustive history of the ' Oxford Alma nacks,' by Mr. C. F. Bell, will be found in the " Art Journal ' of August, 1904. ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xxi moreover had already been paid for, the design was handed over to O'Neill, another water-colour artist, who arranged it to suit the official view, and it appeared in the Almanack of 1809 under his name. The engraver to the University was James Basire, the second of his name, an artist of good standing, whose strong, masculine style continued the best traditions of the school of Sir Eobert Strange and William Woollett. Although his handling was at times inclined to be dark, and his skies hard as compared with those of later engravers, yet his careful drawing and brilliant touch did justice to the breadth of composition and the splendid architectural draughtsmanship of Turner's de signs, all of which are preserved in the University Galleries. In fact, Basire's work is nowhere to be seen to better advantage than in early impressions of these Oxford Almanacks. The Chapel of Merton College, The Quadrangle of Oriel, and The Hall of Christ Church may be cited as especially attractive. It should be added however, that in these, as in all engravings on copper, the quality of the engraver's work can only be seen in the early impressions. With so soft a metal, the fric tion inevitable in printing soon destroys the first brilli ance of effect; in the case of an almanack, where a large number of copies would necessarily be required, this especially holds good. But in the fine series of Proofs of the Oxford Almanacks in the Print Eoom of the British Museum, the strength of Turner's designs and the force of Basire's engraving can be really seen. In 1799 Turner was elected an Associate of the Eoyal Turner Academy, and three years later he became a full Member. a. R.A. He was now much occupied with oil pictures and draw- 1799. ings, both for commissions and for exhibition, and his work for the engravers was only occasional and mostly unimportant. But about 1800 he made an acquaintance INTRODUCTION TO THE Introduc- which was destined to have an important influence on his Whitaker ' career by attracting him to that Yorkshire scenery which 1800. afterwards played so prominent a part in the work of his early manhood. Dr. Whitaker, the vicar of Whalley, a parish on the borders of Yorkshire and Lancashire, was a wealthy and learned antiquary, who at this time re quired some illustrations for his forthcoming ' History of the Parish of Whalley,' one of a series of topographical works dealing with Yorkshire, and Turner having been recommended for the purpose by a Harrogate bookseller, he was invited to the vicarage. An amusing story is told of this first visit. The reputa tion of being a hard bargainer had preceded him, and he had been described to Dr. Whitaker as " a regular Jew." This was understood literally, Turner's personal appear ance lending- some colour to it. Accordingly Mrs. Whit aker on the first morning, much to Turner's surprise, is said to have apologized to him for the presence of ham on the breakfast table. Still greater was his astonishment and indignation on the Sunday morning when, as he was preparing to accompany the family to church, the doctor urbanely placed at his disposal the library during service hours. An explosion ensued, followed by an explanation, which must have been an awkward one for both parties. Turner however, remained and completed the Whalley drawings, but from the following letter it is evident that matters did not run altogether smoothly. Writing on February the 8th, 1800, to a friend, Dr. Whitaker says: l " I have just had a ludicrous dispute to settle between Mr. Townley (Charles Townley, Esq., of Townley), myself, and Turner the draftsman [sic]. Mr. Townley, it seems, has found out an old and very bad painting of G-awthorpe, at Mr. Shuttle worth's house in London, as it stood in the last cen tury, with all its contemporary accompaniments of clipped 1 Whitaker's ' Parish of Whalley,' vol. ii, p. 183. ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xxiii yews, parterres, etc. This he insisted would be more character istic than Turner's own sketch, which he desired him to lay aside and copy the other. Turner, abhorring the landscape and contemning the execution of it, refused to comply, and wrote me very tragically on the subject. Next arrived a letter from Mr. Townley recommending it to me to allow Turner to take his own way, but while he wrote, his mind (which is not unfrequent) veered about, and he concluded with desiring me to urge Turner to the performance of his requisition as from myself. I have, however, attempted something of a com promise, whieh I fear will not succeed, as Turner has all the irritability of youthful genius." The compromise alluded to, seems to have been the handing over to the engraver the responsibility of repro ducing the objectionable picture. Dr. Whitaker's estimate of Turner, to whom he alludes simply as "the draftsman " is amusing, and characteristic of the position then held by all but a very few artists; especially considering that " the draftsman " was an Associate of the Eoyal Academy. Nor does any allusion to the painter's share in the work appear in the preface, which is filled with acknowledgements to various local notabilities who had contributed at their own expense plates of their mansions and parks, as was customary at the time. As the late Cosmo Monkhouse has remarked : 1 "We should have liked to have seen Turner's 'tragical letter,' and also Dr. Whitaker's face, if he had been told that not many years after, a book would have been pub lished of drawings by Turner ' the draftsman,' with de scriptions by the Eev. Dr. Whitaker." — He refers to the far- famed 'History of Eichmondshire,' by which, twenty years later, the doctor's name was to be immortalized by means 1 ' Turner,' by Cosmo Monkhouse (Biographies of the Great Artists), p. 45. Short as this book is, it gives probably the best and truest view of the painter and his work, of any of the many biographies which have yet (1908) appeared. INTRODUCTION TO THE of Turner's illustrations. The ' Whalley ' drawings and engravings, however, were mostly hard and topographical, and show little promise of the brilliant ' Yorkshire period ' which followed a few years later. Turner's Up to 1805 Turner's work had virtually all been repro- ployment of duced in line engraving, but in that year a large mezzo- Mezzotint, tint plate from his famous picture of The Shipwreck was announced for subscription by Charles Turner, a portrait engraver of high standing, a namesake, but not a relative of the painter. This fine print suffers somewhat from the blackness inherent in mezzotint, but it is broadly and skilfully executed, and from an artistic point of view it may be said to be highly successful; yet, judging from the few fine impressions which exist, the wear of the plate in printing must have been extraordinarily rapid, and it is doubtful if the venture could have repaid the engraver. It is interesting to note that the prospectus shows that Turner contemplated issuing coloured impres sions when the plate had become worn out — a practice then very common with portrait and other mezzotints. One or two such impressions, coloured no doubt by his own hand, have survived. The ' Liber _ Turner had recourse to mezzotint again in the following 1806 rUm' vear> f°r ^s famous ' Liber Studiorum.' I have already described that work at length in a separate monograph, and it will be sufficient here to say briefly that, begun in 1806 in emulation of Claude Lorraine's ' Liber Veritatis,' which had recently been issued in England in an engraved form, Turner endeavoured in his 'Liber Studiorum' to dis play, also in engraved form, the whole range of his powers, and to rival on their own ground his predecessors — Claude, Poussin, Eembrandt, Backhuysen, Cuyp, Vander velde, Wilson, and Gainsborough, as well as the painters ENGRA VED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xxv of his own day. He made altogether a hundred or more sepia drawings for the work, very varied in subject, and etched with his own hand on each copper-plate, the founda tion outline which was to correspond with the penwork of the ' Liber Veritatis.' The light and shade, the sky, and the atmospheric effects — which were to correspond with Claude's brushwork — were added in mezzotint, mainly by professional engravers working under Turner's close supervision, but in several cases by his own hand. The production of the ' Liber Studiorum ' was spread over twelve years, and it ceased to appear after 1819, owing to its failure pecuniarily. But although it was commercially unsuccessful and was never completed — to a large extent owing to Turner's own fault — from an art point of view it was a triumph, and there can be little doubt that it is the greatest, because it is the most per sonal, of all Turner's engraved works. From 1800 to 1810 Turner's prints were comparatively A new few in number, and, with the exception of the ' Oxford ^pwj6*' Almanacks,' unimportant in character, but in 1809 a small Villa,' 1809. plate, executed for him by a new engraver, John Pye, had a very important influence on the development of land scape engraving. Turner had painted a picture of Pope's Villa at Twickenham (then in course of demolition), and an engraving from it had been commissioned by John Britton, the enterprising publisher, for his ' Fine Arts of the English School.' In the illustrations to this and other similar antiquarian and topographical works, Brit ton had aimed at a standard of execution higher than that then current in English books of its class, and had secured for his undertakings the aid of several able water- colour artists, including Cotman, Mackenzie, and others, together with some young, rising engravers, amongst whom Le Keux, Eawle, and Pye were prominent. Pye's work, although in other respects no better than that of INTRODUCTION TO THE Eawle and Le Keux, was distinguished by its superior luminousness, especially in the skies. There is a pervading light, a serenity, in the little print of Pope's Villa which gives it a different effect from any previous landscape engraving, although its affinity with the masterly works which were being produced at about the same time by Desnoyers and other French line engravers of the early nineteenth century, some of which Pye had possibly seen, will at once be recognized. It was, in fact, the first ex ample of the style which was afterwards to be perfected in England by Miller, Goodall, Willmore, Wallis, Brandard, and other Turner engravers. Mr. Frank Short has pointed out to me that the lumin ousness which distinguishes this plate from previous work, arises mainly from the greater delicacy of the line, especially in the sky, and from the more skilful gradation of light throughout. It will be observed also that in the sky (much of which is in dry-point), the continuous change in direction of the lines succeeds in rendering the forms of Turner's clouds far better than the * cross-hatching ' which Woollett, Basire, and the older school had em ployed. The plate throughout is clearer in tone, and less black than any which had preceded it, and the careful gradation of the lights is visible everywhere. Notice especially the pollard willows on the left, the light com ing through which is felt to be diffused naturally. It need hardly be said that this new quality of luminous ness at once appealed to Turner, and on seeing the proofs of Pope's Villa he said to Pye: "This will do! you can see the lights; had I known that there was a man who could do that, I would have had it done before." The 'High He at once placed in Pye's hands a more important ford ' l'81^" work wnicn had just been commenced. Wyatt, the well- known Oxford printseller, had commissioned a picture of the High Street, Oxford, to be reproduced in an engraving on a large scale. An extremely interesting correspondence ENGRA VED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xxvii between the painter and the publisher which has sur vived,1 shows the extreme care which from the first Turner had bestowed on the undertaking, and also the keen watch which he kept on the work of the engravers of his day. The high standard of the illustrations in Britton's works had attracted his notice, and in writ ing to Wyatt on the question as to who should engrave the High Street, he suggests two or three names, among which are those of some of the engravers of Britton's ' Antiquities.' Pye, however, is not mentioned among these (probably because no work of his had as yet appeared in the book), and Middiman, an able engraver, had been selected for the High Street. But after the success of Pope's Villa, this arrangement appears to have been altered; Middiman, who was Pye's father-in-law, executed only the Preliminary Etching, whilst Pye carried out the subsequent engraving. Middiman's etching was masterly, and although it is necessarily without shading, and the sky entirely blank, it is nevertheless complete as a picture ; by many, it is even preferred to the finished engraving. Pye's burin and dry- point work however were admirable, and the figures were ably executed by Heath — such collaboration in a large print being frequent at that period. The High Street, Ox ford, although the earliest of the large line engravings after Turner, is one of the best. This was due not only to 1 The letters are all printed in Thornbury's ' Life of Turner,' second edition, pp. 165-7 and 174-5. They are however most con fusingly mixed in their order and some which refer to the later plate Of Oxford from the Abingdon Road are placed among those relat ing to the High Street. As the above Life will be frequently quoted in these pages, it is necessary here to say that although it is a veritable mine of information about Turner, yet that information is at times so inaccurate — and, even when accurate, is often so misleadingly arranged — that the greatest caution is needed in drawing conclusions from its statements. INTRODUCTION TO THE Middiman's brilliant etching and Pye's delicate engrav ing, but also to the extraordinary pains taken by Turner throughout the progress of the plate. His numerous letters to Wyatt, from one of which I quote below, show that whilst he was keenly alive to the importance of breadth and composition, at the same time no detail, from the height and effect of the spire of St. Mary's, down to the correctness of each academical costume in the street, was too trivial to escape his attention. Writing on February 28th, 1810, he says: . . . " The figures introduced are as follows: Two clericals, one in black, with a Master of Arts gown; the other with lawn sleeves for the bishop, being in want of a little white and purple scarf [sic] . . . and followed by a beadle. Now arises some questions — First, is it right or wrong to introduce the bishop crossing the street in . . . with his robes? Whether he should wear a cap? What kind of a staff the beadles use, and if they wear caps? In short these are the principal figures, and if you will favour me with answers to the foregoing questions, and likewise describe to me the particularity of each dress, I should be much obliged to you, for I could wish to be right. " I am your most obedient, " J. M. W. Tuenek." The success of the High Street, Oxford, led Wyatt in the following year to commission from Turner a com panion subject — Oxford from the Abingdon Road. This, with the exception of the figures, was Pye's work through out. Skilful as the latter was with the burin and dry- point, he lacked Middiman's ability as a draughtsman and etcher, and the second plate will not bear comparison with the first. Pye was subsequently employed by Turner on other engravings, in many of which he distinguished himself — notably in the Hardraw Fall and Wyclife Hall of the ' Eichmondshire ' — but although he was a great admirer of the painter and very intimate with him per- ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xxix sonally, the number of his plates is not large, Turner's scale of remuneration having been less satisfactory than he was able to obtain elsewhere. From 1811 onwards, to within a few years of his death, 'The South- Turner may be said to have been constantly employed on 18114827*' drawings for book illustration, the engraving of which he invariably supervised himself. The earliest of the more important and best-known works of his middle period is the ' Views in the Southern Coast of England,' which was begun in 1811. W. B. Cooke, an able engraver and an enterprising printseller and publisher, had projected an important illustrated serial which was to represent in engraving, the coast of England from the Nore on the east to the Bristol Channel on the west. The prospectus announced that the subjects would be supplied by the leading water-colour artists of the day, among whom the most prominent place was given to Turner. It was agreed that the latter should execute forty drawings at the rate of £7 10s. each, and a subsequent forty at a higher price for a ' Northern Coast ' which was to follow, if the first venture proved a success. The engraving was to be in the hands of Cooke and his brother, both of whom were pupils of Basire and accomplished artists, and the letterpress to be furnished by Combe, the author of 'Dr. Syntax,' assisted by Mrs. Hofland. The whole undertaking was a partnership, managed by Cooke, and a share was volun tarily given to Turner in addition to his agreed re muneration. From the first there were troubles. Turner, not con tent with his own part of the work, desired to display in addition his literary powers, and wrote a description to accompany his first plate, St. Michael's Mount. This met with scathing criticism from Combe the editor, who de scribes it in a letter to Cooke 'as" the most extraordinary 1 Thornbury, second edition, pp. 189-90. INTRODUCTION TO THE composition he had ever read"; but on receiving the latter's orders to suppressit,he suggests the compromise of incorporating a part with his own article; and, evidently knowing the painter's irascibility, adds: "if you do not wish to drive Mr. Turner stark staring mad, you had better get two uncorrected sheets from the printer and send them to him." Turner's proffered contribution how ever, was entirely suppressed; yet despite this chilling reception of his first attempt at literature, he continued to write poetical notes as he travelled round the coast making drawings, and allusions to many of the places which he then visited will be recognized in the long poem which was found written in his sketch-books of the tour.1 Strange and disjointed as this is, in common with the numerous other poetical effusions which Turner continued to produce to the end of his life, it is not devoid of merit, and there are passages in which may be seen, despite the awkward diction, the same vein of romantic imagina tion which found a happier expression through the medium of his brush. ' The Southern Coast ' continued to appear at long inter vals over no less than twelve years. Although it has not the imaginative beauty of the ' Eichmondshire ' which fol lowed it, nor the breadth and range of the still later ' England and Wales,' it nevertheless takes an important place in the engraved work of Turner. The drawings, which are all small and highly finished, are mostly simple, carefully composed, often striking in their atmospheric effects, and generally extremely beautiful in colour. The majority are now sadly faded, but amongst those which are still intact, Clovelly Bay? St. Mawes,3 and Lulworth Cove1 may be cited as typical examples of Turner's finished 1 Printed in Thornbury's Life, 2nd ed., pp. 205-17. 2 In the National Gallery of Ireland. 3 Lately in the Stevenson collection. * In the writer's possession. ENGRA VED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xxxi water-colours of his early middle period. Their chief fault — which is still more noticeable in the engravings — is the tendency to the overcrowding of small lights and foreground details. This may be observed occasionally in his earlier prints, but it became from this time onwards, more and more marked in Turner's engraved work. It has been suggested that this tendency was coincident with his return from his first visit to Italy in 1819, and that it was one of the results of that visit. But it must be pointed out that it is clearly visible in the drawings and engravings of ' The Southern Coast ' before the Italian journey — in Falmouth, for instance, published in 1815. It can be seen in fact even as far back as the beginning of the ' Liber Studiorum ' — in Jason, published in 1808, in The Clyde (1811), and it is still more marked in The Source of the Arveron, and Mill near the Grand Chartreuse, both dating from 1816. Another theory 1 is that it arose from Turner's abandoning the mezzotint process which he had been using in his ' Liber Studiorum ' and revert ing to line engraving in ' The Southern Coast ' and sub sequent works; the increasing number of lights and details which he put into his drawings — especially into those intended for engraving — being due to his idea of what was necessary for the requirements of the burin engraver, as compared with the broader effects of the mezzotinter. But it must be remembered that Turner had been employing line engraving continually for twenty years, and although an increasing use of that process might involve some corresponding modification in his drawings, yet, as has been pointed out above, the tend ency in question had appeared much earlier, and had continued to show itself from time to time. My own view is that it was due to a defect inherent in Turner's nature, which grew upon him as he got older. The 1 Sir W. Armstrong, ' Life of Turner,' 1902. INTRODUCTION TO THE Trial Proofs of ' The Southern Coast ' show that in many cases, lights and details were added during the progress of engraving, and there can I think be little doubt that these were the result of the belief which Turner is said to have expressed, that "the public wanted sparkle." Whether or not he was right in that belief, ' sparkle ' he gave them in ' The Southern Coast,' only too freely. To a graver defect is I think to be attributed that licence in dealing with his figures, which begun about this time and increased towards the middle and end of his career, so often to the disfigurement of his finest pictures and drawings, and still more of his prints. With the two former, the figures were frequently valuable as spots of brilliant light or colour, but their vulgarity became all too apparent when reduced to black-and-white. Turner was, it seems to me, a striking example of a dual nature. He was a man of strong intellect, and although he had had no education worthy the name, he was a reader of good literature, a student of classic story, and a voluminous writer of poetry. And when Nature was con cerned, his eye and his mind were always full of poetic vision, and his brush always cunning to depict her every mood and charm. But in things human his tastes were often coarse, his actions sometimes even sordid. And this could not but have affected his art — as it did I be lieve, in the matter in question. ' The Southern Coast ' was mainly engraved by the brothers Cooke, and their work, although different in char acter from the later 'Eichmondshire ' and 'England and Wales,' has a style and distinction of its own. The hand ling is quite unlike that of Pye and his followers, but it is clear, crisp, and well-accented. George Cooke's force in the impressive plate of The Land's End, and his luminous delicacy in Poole Harbour and Teignmouth are especially noteworthy; while the brilliant, decisive touch of the ENGRA VED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xxxiii elder brother in Lyme Regis, The Mew Stone,Bridport, and llfracombe, admirably renders Turner's unrivalled draw ing of the sea. In their skies, however, the Cookes were less successful, as, like Woollett, Basire, and the older school, they depended too much on cross-hatching for their modelling of clouds. Much of the effectiveness of the plates is due to the masterly use of deeply-bitten Etching over the burin work, giving accent and light-and- shade, which could not have been obtained by Line En graving alone. This added Etching was mainly employed in the foregrounds, and the effects of distance are greatly enhanced by its means; but, like all superadded work in engraving, it soon wore away in printing, and the beauty and distinction of the plates can only be really seen in the early impressions. Three other of Turner's most distinguished engravers were employed on ' The Southern Coast.' Goodall was eminently successful in Boscastle, Miller's beautiful Clo- velly Bay was his first commission from the painter, as also was Wallis's Ramsgate. In these plates, all of which appeared towards the end of the work, the influence of Pye is apparent. Throughout, Turner bestowed his usual minute supervision over every detail of the engraving, as is shown by the extraordinarily large number of Trial Proofs which have survived, many of which are of the highest interest.1 There had been troubles between painter and publisher Quarrel all along. The original price of the drawings had been Cooke. fixed at £1 10s. each, and this, soon after starting, had been raised to £10 10s. Later on, towards the end of the work, Cooke had further agreed to pay Turner twelve and a half guineas apiece for forty drawings of ' The Northern 1 The late Lord Tweedmouth possessed nearly a hundred trial proofs of ' The Southern Coast,' many of them touched and written on by Turner. They are now in the collection of Mr. C. Mallord Turner. INTRODUCTION TO THE Coast ' which was to follow. On the strength of this second advance, Turner demanded the extra two and a half guineas not only on such of ' The Southern Coast ' draw ings as had still to be delivered, but also on those already paid for. Cooke naturally objected and a long and angry correspondence ensued, followed by a threat from Turner to bring out a ' Northern Coast ' of his own, if his demands were not complied with. There had also been friction between Turner and the engravers, owing to his claiming as hiB property all the trial proofs which they brought to him for correction; these they had hitherto regarded as their own perquisites. Eventually matters were brought to a climax by his demanding, in addition to his re muneration for the drawings, twenty-five India proofs of each plate. This was most unreasonable, as the num ber of really fine impressions yielded by copper-plates such as those of ' The Southern Coast ' must necessarily have been very limited. The much-tried Cooke could bear it no longer, and in 1827 all connection between him and Turner was broken off. So far as can be judged from the correspondence, Turner was clearly in the wrong. No doubt like other great artists, he was often illogical and unbusinesslike. As Mr. Hamer- ton remarks,1 " His mind was subject to confused changes and irregularities about all transactions, owing to its want of method and clearness." No doubt also, even twelve guineas was a small sum for a finished drawing by an artist of Turner's standing in 1827, but in 1811, when the bargain was made, the £1 10s. originally agreed on (which was soon after raised to £10 10s.) probably represented his ordinary price for works of that size. But it must be admitted that he attempted to upset a perfectly legal agree ment upon which the subscription price of the work had been fixed, which agreement had already oncebeen modified 1 Hamerton's ' Life of Turner,' p. 214. ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xxxv in his favour. Moreover the profits had not been large, and of these he had voluntarily been given a share. Judging from Cooke's final letter,1 which is both reason able and dignified, there is I fear but little doubt that on this — as indeed on other occasions — Turner displayed a grasping, if not an actually dishonest spirit, in dealing with his engravers and publishers. In severing his connection with the Cookes, the loss ' Views in was on Turner's side. During the fifteen years in which Sg?sex'' f they had been associated, Cooke had commissioned from Devon,' him a large number of drawings besides those of ' The 1816"182:1- Southern Coast.' Many of these had been engraved, some — the 'Views in Sussex' and 'The Eivers of Devon,' especi ally — with pecuniary loss to the publisher. Cooke had also published, probably partly if not entirely at his own risk, Turner's ' Eivers of England,' the first landscape mezzo tints engraved on steel, and he had held three exhibitions at his rooms in Soho Square in which a prominent place had been given to Turner's drawings and the engravings from them. He had been in fact throughout a liberal patron of the painter. It may be added that he bore a high character for integrity as well as for enterprise. During the progress of ' The Southern Coast,' in addition Whitaker's to the three series just named, two of which had been (^j,\*enandf abandoned before completion owing to want of public Leeds.' Sur- support, Turner had been occupied with other work for ^am^l816^ the engravers. He had contributed plates to Dr. Whit- 1823.' aker's ' History of Craven ' and ' Loidis and Elmete ' (a History of Leeds), as well as to Surtees's ' History of Durham,' in addition to various single prints. In 1818 he undertook to illustrate for an Edinburgh publisher ' The 'Provincial ProvmcialAntiquities of Scotland,'forwhich Scott, then in ^reStS* 1819-1826. ' 1 Printed in Thornbury's Life, 2nd ed., pp. 186-7. INTRODUCTION TO THE the height of his Waverley fame, had agreed to write gra tuitously a series of descriptive and historical essays. Sir Walter wished the illustrations to be given to the Eev. Mr. Thompson of Duddingstone, a Scotch amateur painter of unusual merit, whose landscapes, little known south of the Tweed, have in some instances so strong a likeness to Turner's early works in oil as not unfrequently to be mistaken for them. But the publishers represented that Turner was the artist in vogue with the public, and Scott consented to the commission being divided. Accordingly, the painter went to Scotland, his subjects — all south of the Grampians — being selected for him. He does not appear at that time to have made Scott's acquaintance. The engravings were well executed — Roslyn Castle, Tantallon Castle, and three of the Edinburgh views being especially attractive. The drawings were afterwards presented by the publishers to Sir Walter in recognition of his share in the success of the work, and they remained at Abbots- ford until a quite recent date. Hakewill's About the same time (1818-20) he received a commis- 1820 1818" s*on fr°m Murray, the publisher, to make eighteen draw ings from camera-obscura sketches in pencil by Hakewill, an architect, to illustrate the latter's ' Picturesque Tour in Italy,' which was about to be published. Turner's draw ings, although thus produced at second hand and from pencil sketches, were highly finished and extremely beautiful. They have obtained perhaps higher praise from Mr. Buskin than any other series except the * Eich- mondshire,' and he retained many of them in his pos session up to his death. The engravings necessarily miss the exquisite colouring which is one of the chief charms of the drawings, but they are carefully, if not brilliantly, executed. La Riccia, Florence from Fiesole, and Turin from the Superga, are amongst the most interesting. ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xxxvii The year 1818 also saw the commencement of one of ' History of Turner's most brilliant successes in book illustration — the ^[^isis. far-famed ' History of Eichmondshire.' This was another 1823. ' of the many topographical and antiquarian works of Dr. Whitaker, the author of the histories of ' Whalley,' 'Craven,' and 'Leeds,' upon which Turner had previously been employed. The ' History of Eichmondshire ' deals with that romantic district in the North Eiding of York shire, on the borders of Westmoreland and Lancashire, of which the town of Eichmond is the centre. It contains most of the highest Yorkshire hills, the beautiful valleys of Swaledale, Mossdale,Eibblesdale, and Wensleydale, and the sources and upper waters of the Ure, the Swale, the Greta, the Tees, and the Lune. The book was intended by Dr. Whitaker to be his magnum opus, and the publishers, Messrs. Longman, spared neither pains nor expense in producing it in the most sumptuous form, the total cost having been not far short of ten thousand pounds. This large sum they barely recouped, although the work achieved a marked success at the time, and has always kept a high place in public esteem. Notwithstanding Turner's fame, it appears to have been thought desirable to appoint a small committee of local gentlemen to choose the subjects which he was to illustrate, and, so far as is known, he acquiesced in their selection. Certainly more beautiful spots than those re presented could hardly have been found, even in that romantic country. He was paid twenty-five guineas each for his twenty drawings, some of which are among the finest he ever executed. They are simple in style, and they have not the elaboration or the rich colouring of the 'Eivers of England,' 'England and Wales,' and other works in water-colour which immediately followed them; but they are masterly in composition, and their dainty harmonies of blues and greens, exquisitely contrasted with rich golden browns and ambers, render them extra- INTRODUCTION TO THE ordinarily attractive.1 Above all, they possess that in definable poetical charm of which Mr. Euskin thus admirably writes : 2 " Of all [Turner's] drawings I think those of the Yorkshire series have the most heart in them, the most affectionate, simple, unwearied serious finishings of truth. There is in them little seeking after effect, but a strong love of place; little exhibition of the artist's own powers or peculiarities, but intense appreciation of the smallest local minutiae. These drawings have unfortunately changed hands frequently, and have been abused and ill-treated by picture-dealers and clean ers ; the greater number of them are now mere wrecks. I name them not as instances, but proofs of the artist's study in this district ; for the affection to which they owe their origin must have been grounded long years before. ... It is, I believe, to these broad, wooded steeps and swells of the Yorkshire downs that we, in part, owe the singular massiveness that prevails in Turner's mountain drawing, and gives it one of its chief elements of grandeur. ... I am in the habit of looking to the Yorkshire Drawings as indicating one of the culminating points of Turner's career. In these he attained the highest degree of what he had up to that time attempted, namely, finish and quantity of form, united with expression of atmo sphere, and light without colour. His early drawings are singularly instructive in this definiteness and simplicity of aim." The engravings of the ' Eichmondshire ' are all in Line, and on copper. Although they hardly reach the standard of the later ' England and Wales,' they are still finely executed. Of course no black-and-white could ever repro duce the delicate harmonies of colour which make the drawings so attractive. Twelve engravers were employed on the work. Six of them — Heath, Eawle, Scott, Le 1 Many alas are now completely faded owing to constant exposure to light, but a few still remain in almost their pristine condition. 2 ' Modern Painters,' vol. i, pt. ii, sec. i, ch. vii, § 39. ENGRA VED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xxxix Keux, Pye, and Middiman — had already been working under Turner, whilst the names of Archer, Higham, Ead- cliffe, W. E. Smith, and Varrall — all frequently to be met with afterwards — appear here for the first time. Pye was especially successful in Hardraw Fall and Wycliffe ; Eawle in Brignall Church and Le Keux in St. Agatha's Abbey and Simmer Lake — to mention only a few. During the period which has recently been under Introduc- review— 1812-1827— it will be observed that by far the ^ of .steel J plates for greater part of Turner s engraved work was executed in engraving, Line and on copper. His experience with the ' Liber Studi- 1820-1824- orum ' had doubtless shown him that Mezzotint — notwith standing its value where breadth of effect is desired, and its greater rapidity and consequent greater cheapness in execution — deteriorated so quickly in printing as to render it quite unsuited for the book illustrations upon which he was mainly engaged. But the discovery, about 1820, that plates of soft steel could be Used in place of copper, gradually effected great changes in engraving. Even a comparatively small number of impressions taken from a copper-plate soon tell on its more delicate lines, the edges of which are broken down in the processes of ' wiping ' and printing; consequently the clear white spaces between those lines become gradually suffused with ink, and the luminousness of the print suffers. The dark parts also, which are produced by thick ridges left purposely on the copper, lose their richness and their sharpness of outline, owing to the flattening of those ridges in printing. The balance of the print is thus doubly affected, the light parts becoming darker and the dark parts lighter; the first brilliancy disappears, the plate gets duller and duller, and retouching and repairing soon become neces sary. But these are short-lived remedies; the first luminousness and freshness are never really regained; xl INTRODUCTION TO THE the new work added on the worn plate soon disappears, and all engravings on copper rapidly deteriorate when once wear has begun. With steel all this is changed. The late Mr. Prior, one of Turner's engravers, told me that fifty to a hundred fine impressions, according to the quality of the copper and the nature of the engraving, were all he could hope for from a copper-plate, whilst with steel many hundreds could be taken before any sign of wear could be detected. His experience tallies with that of other artists who had worked on both metals. At first the introduction of the new metal was strongly opposed by the engravers, who objected to the greatly increased manual labour and the rapid wear of their tools which it involved. Line engraving, even on copper, is a tedious process, but with steel the difficulties are enor mously enhanced. Turner also was at first opposed to its use, dreading lest the multiplication of copies of his prints should lessen their value. Sir Thomas Lawrence (then the President of the Eoyal Academy) once expressed to him his surprise that he still employed copper, and Turner retorted that " He did not choose to be a basket engraver." On being asked to explain his meaning, he replied: " When I got off the coach at Hastings the other day, a woman came up with a basket of your Mrs. Peel [a well-known Lawrence portrait] and wanted to sell me one for sixpence." Turner Eventually however, the advantage of the harder nUtPP*S 1 8301 metal became so manifest that, after 1830, Turner employed it for all his smaller prints, with the exception of his ' England and Wales,' for which only copper-plates were used. Nearly all the large line engravings also, even up to as late as 1845, were on copper. After that date the use of steel became universal. So far as Line Engraving goes, it appears to me that the substitution of the harder for the softer metal has plates, 1830. ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xii been an almost unqualified gain. For Mezzotint and Etching however, steel is less suited, as the softness of the copper gives a freedom of handling which is essential to the artistic treatment of both those processes; but for the line engraver, whose work is altogether more mechan ical in its nature, no such freedom is required. It is probable that for extremely delicate engravings, such as the vignettes which were such an important feature in Turner's later work, steel, apart from its superior dur ability, is even better than copper, as a finer and more certain line can be obtained. It is doubtful if the ethereal beauty and delicacy of the famous illustrations to Rogers's Poems and Italy could have been obtained from copper. Certainly they would have vanished with the first few impressions printed. The improvements which were introduced from time to Steel plates time in the softness and evenness of quality of the steel, fm^jJz^o. led to that metal being tried also for Mezzotint. In 1823 tintengrav- Thomas Lupton engraved a small plate from Girtin's inS>1823- drawing of The White House, Chelsea, and Turner, in the following year, also experimented with it. In 1824, whilst Turner was still associated with the Cookes, a work illus- Turner's trated with small mezzotint plates on steel was planned England and carried out in conjunction with them — ' The Eivers of 1824. England,' or ' Eiver Scenery of England,' as it was after wards called. In the advertisement issued by Cooke, special attention is drawn to the new medium in which the prints were to be engraved, and it is described as being " peculiarly adapted to the powerful effects of light and shade in the varieties of twilight, sunrise, midday and sunset, represented in the masterly productions of Turner and Girtin." But although Charles Turner, Lupton, Say, and other experienced mezzotint engravers were employed, the new metal proved refractory at starting; the first three plates broke down in printing, and had to be re-engraved. Ultim- i. d xiii INTRODUCTION TO THE ately however, the difficulties were overcome, and about twenty engravings, two of which were from drawings by Girtin, were issued in serial form between 1823 and 1827. ' The Eivers of England,' like many other works of Turner, is open to criticism as to its title. As Mr. Euskin has remarked : x "Among the many peculiarities of the late J. M. W. Turner . . . were his earnest desire to arrange his works in connected groups, and his evident intention with respect to each draw ing, that it should be considered as expressing part of a con tinuous system of thought. The practical result of this feeling was that he commenced many series of drawmgs — and if any accident interfered with the continuation of the work, hastily concluded them — under titles representing rather the relation which the executed designs bore to the materials accumulated in his own mind, than the position which they could justifi ably claim when contemplated by others. ... It [' The Eivers of England '] is without a single drawing of a rapidly running stream; very few of the great rivers of England are repre sented in it, and the interest of many of the subjects lies in their architectural landscape surroundings than in the streams themselves." Yet the Series is a very beautiful one ; the engraving is of the finest quality, although, as is inevitable with mezzotint, its general effect is dark as compared with line engraving. Many of the subjects are extremely at tractive; Arundel Castle, More Park, Stangate Creek, and Norham Castle, will compare even with the great mezzo tints of the ' Liber Studiorum.' In some plates no doubt, Turner's habit before alluded to, of multiplying small lights and overcrowding foreground detail, is notice able ; but this occurs only in a few instances, and as has 1 Preface to 'The Harbours of England,' by J. M. W. Turner, R.A. Gambart, 1856. ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xliii been already pointed out, it is more or less characteristic of all his engraved work from 1811, or even earlier, to the end. ' The Eivers of England ' was probably successful com- The 'Ports mercially, as during its progress an announcement was bo^^f " made that it would be followed by a companion series, to England,' be entitled ' The Ports of England.' This appeared in 1826, 1826' and was mainly the venture of Lupton, the engraver. But although, as the prospectus stated, it was "Dedi cated to and under the patronage of His Most Gracious Majesty George IV," and appealed for public support on the ground of " Englishmen's Pride of the Sea and its Naval Heroes," ' The Ports of England ' failed to attract subscribers, and was abandoned when six plates had been published, and a further six nearly completed. After Tur ner's death, the steel plates and the remaining impressions were bought by Messrs. Gambart and re-issued by them in 1856 under the title of ' The Harbours of England, by Turner and Buskin.' The latter contributed a brilliantly written introduction, together with notices of each plate, among which are some of his finest and most illuminating passages on the work of Turner. With ' The Ports of England,' two plates of a further- Turner planned series of ' Marine Views,' and one or two small me^otint prints, Turner's employment of Mezzotint virtually ended. 1826. Probably he found that even with steel the number of good impressions yielded was not sufficient to be com mercially profitable; possibly he may also have felt that for landscape such as his, the process inherently tended to be too black, and that it unavoidably missed the brilliance and luminousness which were his constant aim in his engravings. Whatever may have been the cause, with the exception of a few large and unsatisfactory plates which were never published, he hardly used Mezzotint after 1826. xliv INTRODUCTION TO THE The so- Before abandoning it, however, he would appear, prob- "Sequels to aDly somewhere about 1826, to have made an extremely the Liber f interesting series of experiments with it himself, the u lorum. history an(j intention of which is wrapped in mystery. Eleven small plates, all engraved in pure Mezzotint, some on copper and some on steel, and all evidently by Turner's own hand, were found in his house at his death. A few unfinished trial proofs — probably purloined — were pre viously known to collectors, but they were of the greatest rarity, and, so far as I have been able to ascertain, he had never mentioned the existence of the series to Griffiths his accredited agent, to Mr. Stokes of Gray's Inn, the great contemporary collector of his works, nor to any of the dealers in his engravings. Some of these small mezzotints are finished and others only partly completed; all are extremely beautiful, all show a master's hand. Owing to their incompleteness, it is impossible to speak with certainty as to Turner's in tention in them, but I think they may possibly have started as a series of studies of effects of moonlight under various conditions of weather, atmosphere, and surround ings. This mystery as to their intention, indeed, adds to their great intrinsic charm. They are sometimes known as ' The Sequels to the Liber Studiorum,' but although the fact of a few being on steel proves that they must have been executed subsequently to the Liber — steel was not introduced till after 1820 — I know of no reason what ever for connecting them with that work. Probably they represent a passing idea in Turner's mind which was taken up and dropped, as were many others of a similar nature. Certainly they were the last of the very few engravings which he executed with his own hand. The copper and steel plates were sold at Christie's in 1873-4, along with Turner's vast hoard of engravings; unfortunately at that time the art of printing pure mezzotints had been so long in abeyance that it had been lost, and the ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. xiv printers into whose hands most of them subsequently fell, produced only the most unsatisfactory impressions, although the copper plates, if not the steel, were in ex cellent condition. Meanwhile Turner continued to be constantly in re- Proposal for quest by the publishers for illustrations of their books, engravings and three of his larger engravings, the Cologne, the Tivoli, 1828. and The Temple of Jupiter in the Island ofEgina, appeared between 1824 and 1828. A proposal of a more ambitious character had also been made to him in 1822 by Hurst and Eobinson, a city firm of printsellers, to paint for them three or four important pictures to be engraved on a large scale. Turner entertained the project, as will be seen from the letter1 below, but it ultimately fell through, owing to the terms offered not being high enough to tempt him. The letter — ungrammatical and confused as was usual with him — is specially interesting as showing the keen rivalry with other artists which characterized him throughout his life. The pictures of Eichard Wilson had probably had a greater influence on his early career than those of any other painter, and the desire to pit himself against the artist whom he most admired, as well as against his equally distinguished engraver Wool- lett, was evidently strong. " June 28th, 1822. " Friday morning. " My Deab Sir, " In the conversation of yesterday respecting prints. . . . If you really meant the said offer for me to think of, it appears to me that my scheme, which I mentioned to you in confid ence, would hold — viz., four subjects to bear up with, the " Niobe," " Ceyx," " Cyledon " [Celadon] and " Phaeton " [all 1 Thornbury, second edition, p. 342. xlvi INTRODUCTION TO THE titles of Wilson's pictures] (in engraving as specimens of the power of the British school). Whether we can in the present day contend with such powerful antagonists as Wilson and Woollett would be at least tried by size, security against risk, and some remuneration for the time of painting. The pictures of ultimate sale I shall be content with ; to succeed would perhaps form another epoch in the English school; and if we fall, we fall by contending with giant's strength. " If the " Hannibal," or " The Morning of the Chase " [pic tures already painted] be taken, the first plate would stand thus : — 1, Plate in two years, 2, Picture to be painted, three years, 3, Ditto and two years longer, fourth 4, Ditto and ditto — five years the four plates. Or if all the pictures are painted, if thought more desirable, then take the pictures now done, " Carthage " excepted; one year more must be added, making six years, which allows one year for painting each picture, and two to engrave it, and put into the hands of different engravers immediately. Mr. Pye to engrave one or more if your arrangement with him would not be interrupted thereby, or the general arrangement of time not broken in upon, for six years added to forty-five is not a trifle [this doubtless refers to his own age, but according to the usually received dates Turner was forty-seven in 1822], " Yours most truly, " J. M. W. TlTKNEB. " P.S. This is private; if not to be thought of, burn it im mediately," etc. ' The An- From 1826 to 1828 Turner's work for engraving was 18281S' 1826" mamly concerned with prints of a very small size, to adorn the ephemeral ' pocket ' literature then so much in vogue— the ' Literary Souvenir,' ' Talisman,' ' Keepsake,' and similar productions usually known as 'Annuals.' Some of these tiny engravings are charming, but the ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xlvii straight lines and right angles are too much in evidence in the landscape when the scale is so small, and they often interfere with the design. The vignette form which Turner shortly afterwards adopted for nearly all his small prints, gives far greater freedom. In 1826 Turner, now fifty-one years old, commenced 'England what may be regarded as his central and most ambitious i827-183\eS work in black-and-white — the ' Picturesque Views in Eng land and Wales.' This undertaking was originally the venture of Charles Heath, an engraver, in conjunction with Jennings and Co., a City firm of printsellers, but during its chequered career of ten years it passed through several publishers' hands. It was to be in serial form, and to consist of a hundred and twenty engravings of medium size, the subjects of which were to be taken from English cities, country towns, seaports, cathedrals, castles, abbeys, lakes, and rivers. Turner's drawings for these were in nearly every case elaborate and highly finished. Many were founded on previous sketches and studies in pencil or colour, a vast stock of which he had now accumulated; others were made specially for the work. All represent his water- colour art in its central period of masterly composition, high finish, and full, rich colour ; they are very varied in subject, and generally highly poetical in treatment. Although the old tendency to the multiplication of lights and foreground detail is often noticeable, and the figures at times more than ever unpleasing, there can be no doubt but that in many of the 'England and Wales ' draw ings Turner reaches his highest level. He received sixty to seventy guineas apiece for them — their value now ranges from £600 to £2,000 or more each! The translation of the drawings into black-and-white was carried out mainly by the engravers who had been working under him for the last ten or fifteen years, aided xlviii INTRODUCTION TO THE by several new and able recruits who were continually joining the band. Their trial proofs (many of which are in the Print Eoom of the British Museum), the margins covered with notes and instructions, show the close super vision which Turner gave to the work, which may safely be said to be the most brilliant and finished piece of landscape engraving which up to that time had ever been produced. Yet the 'England and Wales,' notwith standing its masterly design and fine execution, and not withstanding Turner's commanding place in public esteem, was pecuniarily a complete failure. There were few sub scribers or purchasers, and three eminent firms of pubi lishers in succession took up and abandoned the enter prise. Possibly the public had seen too many Turner prints during the last twenty years; possibly they were tired of the irregular and unpunctual appearances of his previous serial issues. Anyhow they declined to buy. The expenses of the work had necessarily been con siderable. In addition to the cost of the drawings, the engravers had received £80 to £100 for each copper-plate. Heath was ruined and became bankrupt in health and pocket, and in 1838 the plates and the large unsold stock of engravings were put up for auction by his trustees. To every one's surprise Turner appeared at the sale and bought the whole at the reserve price of £3,000. Bohn, the cheap book and print publisher, who had been an intending purchaser, endeavoured to induce Turner to resell all or part to him, but the painter required too high a price for the prints, and refused to sell the copper plates at all, declaring that he would not allow his engravings to be hawked about, or his plates to be printed from until they became wrecks — as would undoubtedly have been their fate if they had passed into Bohn's hands. Accordingly both prints and plates remained in the painter's possession until his death; the former were sold at Christie's in 1873-4 along with the rest of his ENGRA VED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, xlix engravings, and the latter were broken up before the Sale. What perhaps most impresses one in the ' England and Wales ' is the poetical, imaginative, treatment of the sub jects represented. There is no attempt at topographical accuracy — "mere map-making," as Turner contemptu ously termed such art. Hills are raised and valleys deep ened; spires and castles are placed, not on the exact spots on which they will be found on an ordnance map, but where they tell most effectively in the composition, and best conduce to the general effect. Yet, notwithstanding this freedom, which Turner, in common with other great masters in every branch of art allowed himself, the spirit of the place represented is rarely missed. The details may not be exact or even approach exactness, but the impression is true. And it is the impression of each place at its best and choicest moment, seen in the mental "vision of a poet, and recorded by the hand of a master of his craft. There is, however, one point in which Turner, whilst always varied, is yet always true to nature — namely, in his rendering of light, of sky, of cloud, of atmosphere. As Monsieur de la Sizeranne has remarked: * " Turner is, in one respect, absolutely realistic: in his skies. He has transformed the trees, reconstructed the towns, upset rivers, arbitrarily raised or demolished mountains; he has faithfully reproduced skies. No one among the most realistic has given a more correct presentment of them." In the ' England and Wales ' every hour is represented — dawn, sunrise, midday, afternoon, sunset, twilight, moonrise, full moon. So is also every phase of weather, every passing atmospheric effect. All are depicted with the profound and accurate knowledge which he had 1 'The Studio,' Winter Number, 1903, p. xvi. INTRODUCTION TO THE gained during forty years of the closest observation, and had stored in thousands of sketches. All are controlled by his unerring instinct of composition, and endowed with a splendour and subtlety of colour which has never been surpassed. Still more, nearly all are suffused with that mysterious, indefinable, charm which we call ' poetry.' Alas that landscape art so perfect should have been marred by the banal and ill-drawn figures which too often he added at the last I Among the finest plates of the ' England and Wales,' of the castles may be mentioned Kilgarren, high above its dark woods and shining river; Windsor, steeped in after noon sunshine; Kenilworth, wan and solitary at moonrise; Alnwick, massive and solemn beneath the full moon. Of the cathedrals, Durham, Ely, and Salisbury. Among English towns, Dudley, with its ancient, deserted castle high above the forges and chimneys which are pouring out their flames and smoke, vividly suggests, as Turner intended, the contrast between the departed feudal age and the rushing industrial life of to-day. How peaceful and beautiful are the ruins of Rivaulx, Valle-Crucis, Malmesbury, and Llanthony abbeys. For natural effects, notice the shining reaches of Winandermere, the rainbow on Keswick Lake, the sunny shores of Flint, the clear, fresh, evening sky and crescent moon of Cowes. For moorland grandeur, The Chain Bridge over the Tees cannot be sur passed, and no hand but Turner's could have rendered the sweep and fury of storm and sea as in Lowestoffe, and The Longships Lighthouse. Is it too much to say that any one of these plates would have been sufficient to have made the fame of a landscape-painter? 'Rogers's During theprogress of the 'England and Wales,' another 'Italy '1830- engraved work of Turner's, very different in scale and 1834. character, achieved a striking success. About 1830 he was commissioned by Samuel Eogers, the banker, connoisseur, ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. Ii and poet, to furnish a series of illustrations to an edition de luxe of his poems. The plates were all to be in vignette form, and Stothard, who contributed some of his most dainty and charming figure subjects, was allied with Turner. The drawings for ' Eogers's Poems ' and ' Italy,' not withstanding the poetical feeling and imaginative power which they display, seem to me as a whole less beautiful than the engravings from them. Many are so unnatural or exaggerated in colour that they strike an unpleasant note. It was probably some reason connected with the engraving which led Turner thus to falsify his colouring, as his ordinary water-colours of the same period — the ' England and Wales ' drawings for instance — show no signs of it, whilst it is more or less present in nearly all those intended for vignettes. In his ' Eivers of France' of a year or two later, where the engravings were to be of the ordinary shape, it rarely appears, but in the almost contemporary vignettes to 'Campbell's' and 'Milton's Poems ' it is very marked. It is difficult, however, to divine in what way this forced colour could have helped the engraver, but it is evident that Turner was content so long as he obtained the light and shade, the atmospheric effects, the sentiment, and the mystery which he desired; truth of colour being often entirely sacrificed. No expense was spared in the production of the two volumes, which, thanks to Turner's illustrations, were to immortalize the poetry of Eogers. The painter was to have received fifty pounds apiece for the drawings, but when it was found that the total cost of the work would be not much short of fifteen thousand pounds, and that a serious loss might be possible, he agreed to take them back, and to lend them at a charge of only five pounds each. This was liberal on his part, but he was now a rich man, and, apart from his satisfaction with the ideal perfection.in design and execution which was aimed Iii INTRODUCTION TO THE at, he no doubt appreciated the association of his name with that of a man as high in the social and literary world as Eogers then was. The majority of the drawings re mained in his possession until his death, and are now in the National Gallery. The engravers were paid thirty to forty guineas apiece for the vignettes, all of which were on steel. The larger number were engraved by Goodall, the father of the late Mr. F. Goodall, E.A. The latter told me that in his youth he was accustomed to take his father's trial proofs backwards and forwards to Turner for his criticism, and that not unfrequently the painter left the engraver to put in the figures. His father kept in his studio for that purpose casts both of the human body and of animals. In one of the most beautiful of the vignettes, The Alps at Daybreak, the chamois in the foreground were a great trouble to Turner, and were entirely re-drawn by Goodall. Engraving on steel on this delicate scale was a work of no little difficulty. The usual preliminary etching had to be made, and the ' biting in ' involved the utmost skill and care lest the acid should penetrate outside the minute lines which the etching- needle had traced, and so spoil the plate. After the etching, extreme care was again necessary in finishing with the burin and dry- point, as with lines so delicate, faults could be corrected only with the greatest difficulty. The ' Eogers ' vignettes were however eminently successful, both the painter and the engravers are seen at their best, and Mr. Euskin is probably right in describing them as " the loveliest en gravings ever produced by the pure line." x It is diffi cult to select for praise where all are beautiful, but as examples of Turner's imaginative power, Leaving Home, The Alps at Daybreak, The Vision of Columbus, and Datur Hora Quieti, can hardly be surpassed; nor for 1 Catalogue of Turner Drawings at the National Gallery, 1881. ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, liii poetical treatment of natural scenery, Loch Lomond, Tornaro's Brow, The Lake of Como, and St. Herbert's Chapel. Mr. Hamerton has written so admirably of these vignettes l that I am tempted to quote from him at length : "Turner has seldom been so perfectly the poet as in the illustrations to Eogers. ... Of all artists who ever lived I think it is Turner who treated the vignette most exquisitely, and if it were necessary to find some particular reason for this, I should say that it may have been because there was nothing harsh or rigid in his genius, that forms and colours melted into each other tenderly in his dream-world, and that his sense of gradation was the most delicate ever possessed by man. If you examine a vignette by Turner round its edges, (if you can call them edges), you will perceive how exquisitely the objects come out of nothingness into being, and how cautiously, as a general rule, he will avoid anything like too much materialism in his treatment of them until he gets well towards the centre. . . . Even the least poetical are still very far removed from the prose art, whilst it is simply impos sible to find in them any careless neglect of those subtle artifices of arrangement which Turner understood better than any other landscape painter. . . . Stothard's contribution to the illustrated edition of Eogers, though often graceful and charming, look like patches on the page, and the patches are sometimes awkwardly shaped, whilst Turner's never seem to be shaped or put on the paper at all, but we feel as if a portion of the beautiful white surface had in some wonderful way begun to glow with the light of genius. . . . Turner's vignettes . . . may be divided into landscape subjects, marines, architec ture, and supernatural inventions. The vignette of Derwent- water is one of the best of the pure landscapes. The sky, with great pale clouds and the sun in its splendour lighting their edges, is one of the most perfect of all Turner's skies for its delicate truth of pale tones. . . . The bits of Alpine scenery in 1 Hamerton's ' Life of Turner,' pp. 227-229. liv INTRODUCTION TO THE 'Jacqueline' and 'The Alps at Daybreak,' are especially admirable for the expression of that shadowy vastness which so strongly impresses us in the loftiest ranges. I have heard artists affirm that even a large picture can give no idea of a lofty mountain, yet the vignette of the G-aronelle, with the Alps of Piedmont in the distance, gives me such an idea quite perfectly, and it is only three inches high. This is due, not to truth of portraiture, which Turner always neglected, but to his knowledge of mountain structure and effect. Anyone who knows the Alps can see at once that these really are Alps, twelve thousand feet high at least, though a Cumberland hill seen near would have its sky line quite as high on paper. One of the finest of the marine subjects is ' Columbus Dis covering Land,' and here again we have clear evidence that a great scale is not necessary to the production of a great effect. The line of sea horizon is only about an inch and a quarter long in the engraving, yet from the effect chosen in water and sky it conveys an awful idea of the vastness of the deep. The figure in its simple grandeur, with the old ship for a pedestal, is one of Turner's rare successes in figure conception. There are two particularly successful instances of the treatment of architecture: one a building seen from outside, ' Greenwich Hospital'; the other the interior of an imaginary G-othic Chapel with banners and tombs. The Greenwich is another excellent instance of largeness expressed on a small scale. The vastness of the building is intentionally exaggerated, and it is made to look prodigious. Who would believe that the twin towers, with the domes, are only an inch high on the paper? . . . Within that little space you have columns on columns, cornices, architraves, attics, dome, and lantern, all drawn with the most exquisite care, and there is a delicate play of light and shadow along the whole front of the building. " A very grand bit of supernaturalism is that of the armed phantoms passing across the sky after sunset. Slowly along the evening sky they went, As on the edge of some vast battlement, Helmet and shield and spear and gonfalon ; Streaming a baleful light that was not of the sun ! ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. Iv The verses are impressive, but the drawing is much more impressive than the verses. The last rays of the afterglow are in the sky; the ships are motionless on the dark ocean; on the high poop of one of them stands a little human figure, and before him passes the strange procession of giant shapes, half mingled with low vapour, through which a solitary star shines dimly. The superiority of the drawing to the verses is due, I believe, to the greater resources of mystery which the painter had at his disposal. The sense of mystery can be conveyed in words, but not easily in a few lines." Other books with illustrations by Turner, many of them ' The Rivers vignettes, and all on a small scale, followed one another Sf^UJK6' in rapid succession between 1830 and 1837. During those years, in addition to painting a large number of sketches and pictures in oil, he must have made over three hundred drawings for engraving — most of them highly finished — and have directed and corrected with the minutest care, the engraving of each one. Such an ' output ' must, I imagine, be a record. The best known and probably the finest series of these small prints is ' The Eivers of France,' which was first published in three successive volumes under the title of ' Turner's Annual Tour — Wanderings by the Loire and the Seine,' 1833, 1834, 1835. The drawings are on grey paper, and mainly in body-colour. Most of them are now in the National Gallery.1 The finest, such as Chateau Gaillard, Caudebec, Rouen from St. Catherine's Hill, Jumieges, and St. Denis are superb, and probably reach the highest point ever touched in body-colour. Others are slighter in execution, and some few are a little exag gerated in colour. The engravings, which are of the same size as the drawings, are finely executed, but they suffer 1 Turner one day brought the whole series to Buskin in a dirty piece of brown paper and offered them to him, unbroken, for twenty-five guineas apiece. To Buskin's grief he could not induce Ivi INTRODUCTION TO THE from the rigid containing lines and angles — how greatly, can be seen by comparing the ordinary subjects with the two frontispieces — Chateau GaiUard and' The Light- Towers of the Heve — both of which are in vignette form. Still, Beaugency, Amboise, and Clairmont in the Loire series, and Caudebec, Chateau de la Maillerie and St. Denis in the Seine — to name only a few — are masterpieces of poetical design and brilliant execution. Mr. Hamerton, writing with intimate knowledge of French rivers and French scenery, devotes an extremely interesting chapter J to ' The Eivers of France.' One of his remarks is very true, not only of it, but of Turner's works generally. He says: " One of the first things that strikes us on looking through the ' Eivers of France ' is, how much less Turner seems to have cared for the rivers themselves than for the human works whieh are connected with them. . . . There are sixty plates in all, and among these sixty I find fifteen with castles or chateaux, fifteen with cathedrals or important churches, twenty-two with at least one bridge and six with two bridges. There are also half a dozen subjects of seaports . . . and the same number of compositions without either water or land scape, the river being out of sight and the land covered with buildings." He goes on to quote a letter from Byron, showing that the poet also held that it is the works of man — his castles, temples, ships, and other artificial objects — which so greatly enhance, if indeed they are not actually neces sary to the poetical effect of natural scenery : "Am I to be told," Byron asks, " that the nature of Attica would be more poetical without the art of the Acropolis? of his father to spend the money. In later years he had to pay £1,000 for the seventeen which he gave to Oxford, and these would now (1908) probably be worth at least £3,000 ! 1 Hamerton's ' Life of Turner,' ch. xii, p. 239. ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. Ivii the temple of Theseus? and of the still all Greek and glorious monuments of her exquisitely artificial genius? Ask the traveller what strikes him as most poetical — the Parthenon or the rock on which it stands? the columns of Cape Colonna or the Cape itself ? . . . There are a thousand rocks and capes far more picturesque than those of the Acropolis and Cape Sunium in themselves ; what are they to a thousand scenes in the wilder parts of Greece, of Asia Minor, Switzerland, or even of Cintra in Portugal, or to many scenes of Italy and the Sierras of Spain? But it is the art, the columns, the temple, the wrecked vessels, which gives them their antique and their modern poetry, and not the spots themselves. Without them the spots of earth would be unnoticed and unknown." This it seems to me is the spirit with which, consciously or unconsciously, Turner was animated throughout his life. During the same period as Turner was engaged on ' The Murray's Eivers of France,' he contributed twenty-six small plates ifs^igjfo. to a new issue by Murray of the Life and Works of Byron. The drawings for these were taken mainly from sketches by various artists, in Greece and other countries which Turner had never visited. As might have been expected, they are as a rule less interesting than the illustrations drawn by him at first hand. One vignette, however, The Plains of Troy, is well-known as a marvel of design and execution; The Acropolis at Athens also is fine and poetical. The * Byron ' illustrations were followed by plates for Scott's Cadell's edition of ' Scott's Poetical and Prose Works,' ^Profe which appeared between 1834 and 1836. For these Works,' Turner in 1831 had made a special journey to Scotland, 100*"10,5D- where he was the guest of Sir Walter, and under his guidance had visited all the most interesting spots on the Tweed and the Border. In one of the most charming plates — Melrose — he is depicted in the foreground with lviii INTRODUCTION TO THE Scott and Cadell, picnicking on a height overlooking the river and the Abbey. The illustrations to the ' Poetical Works ' were taken from nature and from Scotland, and nearly all are beautiful — Ashestiel, LochAchray, Dryburgh Abbey, Staffa, and Loch Coruiskin, strikingly so. The sub jects of the ' Prose Works ' are more varied, and perhaps as a whole less interesting, but Brienne, Calais, Simplon, Malmaison and many others, are very attractive. Finden's Bible, 1835- 1836. To the ' Byron ' and ' Scott ' series, succeeded, in 1835, thirty plates for Finden's 'Landscape Illustrations of the Bible.' Although all these, like many of the ' Byron ' plates, were taken at second hand from drawings on the spot by other artists or by amateurs, they were trans formed by Turner, and are strikingly poetical in treat ment ; notably Egypt, Nineveh, Solomon's Pools, and the beautiful unpublished Jerusalem from the Latin Convent. Moxon's Milton, 1835. After the ' Bible ' series came, in 1835, seven illustra tions to Moxon's edition of 'Milton's Poems.' Here Turner's imagination had full scope, and his Mustering of the Warrior Angels and The Fall of the Rebel Angels are magnificent in conception. But, as was so often the case with Blake in his treatment of similar subjects, small faults of taste or of drawing in the figures greatly detract from their impressiveness. The otherwise fine Temptation on the Pinnacle is spoiled by the appearance of balancing in the central figure ; in The Expulsion from Paradise the design is beautiful, and the vista of the Garden exquisite, but again the figures are unsatisfactory. Still, as works of high imaginative power, the ' Milton' plates seem to me to deserve a higher place than Mr. Buskin and others have accorded them. Especially it should be borne in mind that it is by the engravings rather than by the drawings, that all Turner's vignettes should be judged. ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, lix Moxon's edition of ' Campbell's Poems,' published in ' Campbells 1837, was the last important work illustrated by Turner, ' who contributed to it twenty-four vignettes. Some un usual transaction took place with regard to the drawings, two versions of which are given by Thornbury.1 Neither of them, however, agrees with the following interesting account which I had direct from the late Mr. Goodall, E.A., whose father was the engraver employed. As his story is so circumstantial, and he himself was present on the occasion, I find it difficult to think that his memory could have deceived him. He told me that Moxon the publisher had agreed with his father, the engraver, that Turner should be given a commission for twenty or more drawings, for which he was to receive thirty pounds apiece, or somewhere about £700 in all. Goodall was to engrave the plates, and instead of being paid for them in the usual way, he and Moxon were to divide all the costs and risks, and to share the profits equally. A draft agreement to that effect was shown by Moxon to Goodall, and later on, the latter signed the document without reading it. Afterwards he discovered that it differed materially from the original proposal as he had under stood it, and that it would probably mean a very serious loss to him. For several weeks the household were in great anxiety, and Goodall, who was on very friendly terms with Turner, was advised to ask the painter to cancel the commission for the drawings.. He did so, but at first met with a refusal; shortly afterwards, Turner called at Goodall's house late one night, and would come no further than the hall. On Goodall's going to him, he said : " You ask me too much — see what a sum I lose! " Goodall replied: " You could always get equally good pay for your time, Mr. Turner." Turner said: " He did not see that he could be expected to forego such a 1 ' Life of Turner,' second edition, pp. 232-3. Ix INTRODUCTION TO THE sum." Then Goodall's little daughter happened to come into the hall, and going up to Turner asked him, " if he was the great Mr. Turner?" Turner was pleased and said: "I am Mr. Turner, don't know about great Mr. Turner," and patted her head. Finally he agreed to give up the commission, and said : " This is the greatest act of generosity I have ever done in my life." In the end he made the drawings, charged the publisher £5 each for the loan of them, and retained them in his possession until his death. The execution of the ' Campbell ' vignettes is fine. Some — such as A Summer's Eve, The Andes Coast, A Swiss Valley, and Wyoming — will bear comparison even with the ' Eogers ' plates, but others are very forced and melo dramatic in treatment. After the ' Campbell's Poems,' Turner, who was now sixty-two years old, illustrated no further books of importance. He contributed in 1837 six plates to ' White's Views in India,' and in 1840, a few tiny but exquisite en gravings, all taken from his earlier pictures or drawings, appeared in ' The Book of Gems,' and in 'Art and Song.' These were his last book illustrations. The large There remain still to be noticed the important large cravings. Line Engravings by which Turner is so well known. These appeared at different periods in his career — the majority towards its close. They were mainly the ven tures of various printsellers, and were mostly published by subscription. The earliest and one of the best is the High Street, Oxford, of 1812, which has already been alluded to.1 It was followed by the Cologne in 1824, the fine Tivoli in 1827, and The Temple of Jupiter in the Island of Angina in 1828. From 1838 to 1851 (the year of his death), a succes- 1 Ante, pp. xxvi-xxviii. ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. Ixi sion of large engravings appeared at intervals; most of these were taken from his important and well-known oil pictures. Among the best are Crossing the Brook; Mercury and Argus; Mercury and Herse ; The Grand Canal, Venice; Caligula's Palace; Ancient Italy; and The Fighting Temeraire. Proofs of the nearly completed pair of Dover and Hastings were brought to him on his death-bed to touch, but he was too ill for the task. Characteristically however, he stipulated even then, that if he should be able to undertake it he should receive his usual fee and fifty India proofs of each plate. Most of the large prints were engraved on copper — even those published as late as 1845 — although by that time the use of steel had become universal for all ordinary work. Turner's engravers, skilful as they were, greatly preferred the softer metal, and dreaded the enormous labour which steel involved on prints of so large a scale, as well as the difficulty of correcting faults. Even with copper, each large engraving required two years, and often more, of almost continuous work. Some important plates which had been planned or Engravings commenced before Turner's death in 1851, were com- ?«gr Tur pleted and published afterwards; others from the hands ner's death of his old engravers, appeared at intervals up to as late as 1874. Amongst these is Wallis's beautiful Approach to Venice (1859). Willmore's Temple of Minerva, Cape Colonna (1854), Miller's Bell Rock Light House (1862), and Chapman's Sun Rising in a Mist (1874), all also show that although the engravers had no longer Turner's keen eye and expert hand to direct and correct them, their long experience under him enabled them still to reproduce the spirit of his pictures, even although the loss of the controlling eye and hand are here and there visible. The only smaller engravings of any importance were the sixty plates o^ ' The Turner Gallery,' which appeared in 1861. INTRODUCTION TO THE These were taken almost entirely from his. oil pictures of various periods. Many were the work of his old engravers, and the general standard of execution may be said to be high; but they are too uniformly smooth and facile in effect, and they lack the clearness, force, and accent which he would have given them. Etchings, Aquatints, and Litho graphs. Comparison of Line En graving with other methods. Of the methods other than Line Engraving which were employed by Turner, the most important, Mezzotint, has already been dealt with.1 Etching, i.e., ' Painters' Etch ing,' he never practised for its own sake, although the etchings of the ' Liber Studiorum ' — all of which were the work of his own hand — show that, so far as the organic lines of a picture go, he was master of that process as he was also of Mezzotint. Aquatint he made use of in a few cases as a basis for colour prints; these however, with the exception of one series, are unimportant. Lithography he employed on one occasion only, but soon after his death, several fairly successful reproductions from his pictures were made in the then newly-discovered Chromo-Litho- graphy, some of which are probably among the best of their kind ever produced in England. It is, however, chiefly by his Line Engravings that Turner's work in black-and-white must be judged, and it is doubtful if any of the other methods of reproduction then practised would equally well have rendered the spirit of his art. Turner was before all things a colourist — he expressed himself as instinctively in colour as Baphael did in line and Eembrandt in light-and-shade. He was also pre-eminently a painter of light, of the sky, of fleet ing effects of atmosphere and weather, of the sea in its varying moods— all more or less interfused with poetry and mystery. All these, Line Engraving, by its inherent 1 Ante, p. xliii. ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. Ixiii delicacy, its luminousness, its serenity, seems more cap able than any other process to interpret. Mezzotint, although effective for breadth and mass, appears essen tially too black to translate colour, especially colour as subtle and varied as Turner's. Etching is so scratchy — the line is so constantly in evidence — for the rendering of pictures in which sun, sky, and delicate atmospheric effects play so large a part. Even so able an artist as the late Monsieur Brunet-Debaines can hardly be said to have succeeded in the translation of Turner's works, greatly as he, in common with the other French etchers, was impressed by them. It was the luminousness which Turner saw was possible with Line Engraving that from the first he strove for; this, once obtained, he instantly fastened on and triumphantly carried to heights unknown before. " You can see the lights," he wrote in 1810 to Pye, the new engraver,1 " had I known there was a man who could do that, I would have had it done before." It was this quality, which in spite of the drawbacks inseparable from the more or less mechanical nature of the process, ren dered the latter probably the most faithful as well as the most decorative medium that he could have employed. Of course, however fine the engraver's work may be, if a Turner print is compared with the drawing from which it is taken,' it is apparent in all but a few excep tional cases (such as the vignettes) how utterly inferior to the original is even the best reproduction. Yet with this reservation — which holds good of the work of every great artist — it will be observed that the pictures of Turner, great and subtle colourist as he was, as a rule translate extremely well into black-and-white. This is due to several causes. Probably no painter before him — unless possibly Eubens — ever so completely controlled the en graving of his own pictures, or ever so set himself to 1 Ante, p. xxvi. lxiv INTRODUCTION TO THE educate the engravers who worked for him; certainly none ever bestowed the same infinite pains on every detail of every plate.1 Then, from an early period of his career he was familiar with the technique, the capabilities, the limitations of every engraving process; consequently not only was he always able to design with a view to success ful reproduction, but he knew also exactly how to direct his engravers during the progress of their plates. He had also an unerring eye for composition, and an extraordin arily fine sense of the balance of light and shade in his works. During the progress of his engravings, especially those from his oil pictures, if he found that the composi tion or chiaroscuro were affected by the absence of colour, he would change the positions and relations of the lights and darks, or add either where they had not existed in the original. No doubt, as has been already pointed out, his keen desire for brilliance in his engravings, — ' sparkle ' he termed it — led him at times unduly to multiply small lights, and in so doing to sacrifice not unfrequently much of the original breadth and unity of effect. Yet in spite of this and other defects, there can I think be little doubt that the engraved work of Turner, regarded as a whole, represents the highest point yet reached in the in terpretation of landscape. Mr. Hamerton well sums it up : 2 " Some [of his plates] were in mezzotint, but the majority were in that modern style of landscape engraving which is familiar to every reader, and which, with all its faults, un questionably marks the highest point of perfection attained hitherto in the complete interpretation of landscape art on metal. It is not pure burin-work, but a mixed style, including a great deal of etching, much work with the point, and not a little ruling; but taken as a whole, in the hands of the mar- 1 At the end of this Introduction will be found some examples of his instructions to his engravers. * Hamerton's ' Life of Turner,' p. 210. ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. Ixv vellously skilful men who used it ... it interprets landscape painting more completely than any other method. Mezzotint can render the tones of light and shade with unsurpassable accuracy, but it is never so lucid and luminous as engraving, and consequently its effects of atmosphere can never be so pure. Independent etching may suggest delicate distinctions of tone, but does not so surely render them as engraving does, and is therefore not so well adapted for the interpretation of skies." And in another passage : 1 "The engravers who interpreted Turner, and interpreted him on the whole so astonishingly well, were a school which had its methods in common. Take the volume of the ' Eivers of France ' and try to guess who engraved each plate, without looking at the engraver's name in the corner. Those plates were done by twelve different engravers ; can you recognize them by their work? No, you cannot; the book is so homo geneous that it looks as if the designs had been all engraved by one person. Exactly the same methods of interpretation have been employed throughout. And yet what consummate skill! What admirable precision in dealing with the most subtle distinctions of tone in those skies and water-surfaces of Turner! Here is a kind of engraving which, without being personal, since twelve men could do it, is still more useful and valuable, for it has rendered with exquisite delicacy the work of a great genius, and multiplied it by thousands." It is to be regretted that amongst all the engraved work of Turner there are no reproductions of those beautiful late sketches and studies which, to some of us, represent the last and highest expression of his water-colour art. But they would not have been to the taste of his genera tion, and it is doubtful if even to-day they would have a very wide appreciation, judging from the relative value which the finest of such sketches command, as com pared with his more highly-finished drawings. 1 ' Etching and Etchers,' 3rd ed., p. 289. lxvi INTRODUCTION TO THE Turner's finest Line Engravings will I believe be sur passed only when the accurate reproduction of the most delicate colours can be obtained by processes or methods primarily mechanical, yet capable of perfect artistic direc tion and control. Towards this much-to-be-desired goal, the art of photographic colour-printing seems daily to be making rapid strides. Turner If time and space permit, I may be able hereafter to eneT1"8 s a(^ some notices of the engravers to whose skill — itself largely due to his training and influence — Turner's en gravings testify. They were more than eighty in number, and amongst so many, it is difficult to classify in order of merit. A contemporary engraver, now dead, told me that on Turner's being once asked to name the six whom he considered the best, he selected Miller, Willmore, Goodall, Brandard, Pye, and Wallis. After these I would place — from the earlier men, the brothers Cooke, Eawle and Le Keux — and from the later, W. B. Smith, J. B. Allen and J. Cousen. The latter's vignettes and small plates cannot be surpassed. The engravers worshipped Turner as a great genius, but they stood in great dread of him. Although at times he could be kind even when he was rough, generally speaking he was a hard master, imperious and exacting, and they were terrified of being sent for by him to com plain of their work. There were also perpetual feuds on the question of the trial proofs which from time to time they brought to him to be touched; these, which they had hitherto regarded as their perquisites, he claimed as his property. Some engravers submitted, but others to the last refused to give them up, and quarrels were fre quent and sometimes furious. In the same way, from about 1820 onwards, he claimed from the publishers of his engravings a continually in creasing number of early proofs of each plate; beginning ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, lxvii with eight, he advanced to fifteen, then to twenty-five, and finally, when the use of steel had become general, he demanded, and generally obtained, fifty. Shrewd as he was, he was sometimes outwitted over these. He stipulated that he should receive only the finest impressions, but when as occasionally happened, a plate seemed likely to yield fewer than usual, all that were wanted for sale were printed first, and Turner's afterwards; even although by that time deterioration had begun. All these proofs, together with many unfinished or un published copper and steel plates, he stored at his house in Queen Anne Street, where they were found at his death.1 The vast hoard remained untouched during the long litigation over his will, until by order of the Court of Chancery, it was dispersed at Christie's in 1873 and 1874, the Sales occupying twenty days and realizing over forty thousand pounds. Turner and his engravers have all long since passed away, and photography has killed the beautiful art of Line Engraving — in England at all events. The following passage, written by an artist 2 who lived and worked among the men whose business it was to translate into black- and-white and so place within reach of the public, the pictures of their day, gives a vivid, although also a some what pathetic picture of the life of a line engraver of that time. Writing probably somewhere in the sixties, he says : " With few exceptions, engravers find it hard to make a bare living by their art, and the chances offered by the pro fession are not sufiicient to tempt young men of ability, and 1 An extremely interesting letter from Mr. Buskin senior to his son, describing his visit to Turner's house soon after his death will be found (p. xxvi) in the Introduction to Vol. XIII of the recent Library Edition of Buskin's Works. 2 The late C. W. Badclifle. Quoted in the preface to the Catalogue of the Exhibition of Engravings by Birmingham Engravers held at Birmingham in 1877, pp. 5-0. lxviii INTRODUCTION TO THE of real artistic power, to enter it. The work is too slow to allow the engraver to realize, in even the most moderate pro portion, the gains obtained by other artists ; the conditions of it are especially self-denying and severe; and the public appreciation of the artist is not sufficiently high to compensate by fame the lack of substantial reward. Yet, the line engraver ¦ — one worthy of being ranked in the highest class — is an artist deserving of special honour, for it is by his mind and hand alone, that pictures owned by the few can be multiplied for the many, and can, indeed, in many cases be interpreted even for those who are privileged to possess them. The en graver has not only to work for but with the painter. Turner understood this, for there were few, if any, of the plates engraved from his works upon which there are not traces of his own hand — changes in colour, and form, and effect; happy suggestions — a bit of dark, a point of light, a new sweep of line, an alteration of mass of light and shade — worked out in consultation with the engraver, and by him translated from rough hints into effective and intelligible shape. . . . " I should like to say one word for engraving and its diffi culties, that is, in the rendering of colour into black and white. Take a picture or drawing by Turner in his latter time, full of mystery, and apparently with no accurate drawing in it. First, a reduction has to be made to a scale. The original may be full of the most delicate architectural work, crowded perhaps, with figures — all, at first glance, a shapeless mass, but all requiring, for the engraver's purpose, to be put into order, and to be sub mitted to Turner's critical eye. When the plate gets well into progress, then comes the question of colour — a bit of bright orange, or scarlet, or blue; how shall it be rendered in black, or white, or gray ? Turner knows ; but the engraver dare not ask him until the plate is in such a condition as to require touch ing. I have seen engravers perfectly bewildered as to what they should do in such cases. All who have studied Turner's work will feel the immense difficulty in translating them into black and white; remembering that during the painter's life each plate had to go through the ordeal of his examination, his criticism, and his alterations. . . . And yet with such qualities necessary to their Art, few men have more lacked the - ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, lxix sympathy and appreciation of the public than engravers; few men have been less known, few have lived more solitary or more laborious lives. Bending double all through a bright sunny day, in an attic or close work-room, over a large steel plate, with a powerful magnifying glass in constant use; care fully picking and cutting out bits of metal from the plate, and giving the painfully formed lines the ultimate form of some of Turner's most brilliant conceptions ; working for twelve or fourteen hours daily, taking exercise rarely, in early morning or late at night; 'proving' a plate, only to find that days of labour ha^e been mistaken, and have to be effaced, and done over again; criticized and corrected by painters, who often or always look upon engravers — to whom they owe so much — as inferior to themselves; badly paid by publishers, who reap the lion's share of the value of their work; and treated with indifference by the public — such is too com monly the life of an engraver. . . ." I cannot close these introductory remarks without saying that, leaving Turner's oil pictures apart, I am convinced that no one can make a study of his engraved work — and still more of the hundreds of drawings and thousands of sketches on which that work was founded — without being profoundly impressed with the sense of his power. Notwithstanding occasional faults of taste apparent to every one, his work is stamped with those rare qualities of ' infinity,' of poetry, of mystery, of mastery over every form and aspect of Nature, which are to be found in conjunction, only in the very greatest artists of all times and all schools. The following examples show how Turner, when correct ing his engravers' Trial Proofs, took pains to let them understand his reasons for the alterations which he re quired, and in so doing, educated them to a knowledge of his aims and methods. Many similar will be found in the Catalogue. Ixx INTRODUCTION TO THE (1) His earliest written instructions known to me are on a trial proof of Christ Church Cathedral (' Oxford Al manacks,' 1811) in my possession. Turner has added in ink, crockets on the angles of the cupola of ' Tom ' tower, and has drawn a sketch of it on the back of the proof, against which he has written: " Tom is not like. Get Dayes' or Booker's or Delamotte's [other artists who had drawn it in previous Almanacks] to look at. It has Crockett's [sic] at the angles up to the sets [?] of the lead work." The sky is also touched extensively in white, to indicate that the clouds should be much lightened, and rays of sunshine are added, coming through the trees on the left. (2) On a proof of Lyme Regis (' Southern Coast,' 1814), in the Print Boom of the British Museum, he has drawn pencil lines across the cliffs on the right and the storm clouds above them, adding: "You will perceive by the lay of the lines which I have added how I think they should be placed to counteract the sweeping lines of all the hills; and the dots do pray mind, to prevent the bald appearance it now has. The lights I want had better be reserved until the next proof." A later proof has no further remarks by him, but bears the following interesting note by Cooke, the engraver : " On receiving this proof," writes Cooke, " Turner expressed himself highly gratified — he took a piece of white chalk and a piece of black, giving me the option as to which he should touch it with. I chose the white; he then threw the black chalk to some distance from him. When done, I requested he would touch another proof in blade. ' No,' said he, ' you have had your choice and must abide by it.' How much the com parison would have gratified the admirers of this great and extraordinary artist! " Cooke's meaning here I imagine to be that Turner was ready to correct his engravings by either of two methods ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER, lxxi — i.e., by touching (a) the darker parts with white chalk, for lightening, or (b) the lighter parts with pencil, for darkening; his aim in both cases being to obtain the right balance of light and shade. (3) On a proof of Corfe Castle (' Southern Coast,' 1814), in the collection of the late Lord Tweedmouth : " This hill you had, I think, far better take out, and place the lines as marked and keep it lighter, for it takes away now the conical shape of the Castle Hill. As to the cross lines which you propose doing over the sky in your note, I feel doubtful about all strengths ; about the towers may be cross lines, for they are too smooth, and the perpendicular tone prevails too much throughout the plate. The linen on the hill [laid out to dry] much lighter." (4) On one of Teignmouth (' Southern Coast,' 1815), in the same collection : " Dear Sie. — As so much depends upon what effect your brother [George Cooke] intends to bring the sky up to, I have not touched upon it, but could wish to see a proof when he thinks he has done all he can to correspond with the drawing, but would advise him not to do anything to the water or fore ground for the present, but to get richness, lightness, and clear ness to the sky and the light flittering [? flickering] clouds, particularly in the upper part." And on a later proof of the same plate : "The tone of the church requires a little more solidity about the upper part, but take care of blackness. One of the figures standing on the shore in the middle distance is too much a Falstaff, the other Master Slender. Make the sun, if you can, more visible as to disk [here a sketch] at the upper most side, and then the plate will do. The boat's foremast has no bottom to it, burnish one in, and make a shadow." (5) On one of Edinburgh from the Calton Hill (' Provin cial Antiquities of Scotland,' 1820), in the possession of Mr. Francis Bullard, Boston, U.S.A.: lxxii INTRODUCTION TO THE [Turner indicates with marks, places that he wishes] " to be burnished horizontally to make the town darker." [Another series of marks] " Burnished, to make the cross bank more solid, and the buildings, and lighter than 2 and 3 [pencil numbers on the proof] X [indicates] blunder, keep House light. . . . Don't fear the number of windows, for those at 3 [number in margin], are 14 floors high on the side of Castle ditch, 7 in the High St. I have kept all your forms, so follow all my marks particularly in the Houses, to obtain the ' Look ' of Edinbro which these touches will give. I am sorry to make the alteration at the Castle Entrance [lights here picked out with a pen-knife], but there is a House which must come out; the Entrance is thus [here Turner has made an elaborate sketch of the Castlerock and Castle. The hidden approach is in dicated with the words • rock,' ' parade,' ' battery,' ' Eock on which the Half moon Battery is built '] if you can make the figures lighter crossing the bridge they will be better. Make the Old Woman's Hands & Feet more marked and then finis." The "Look of Edinbro" quoted above is eminently characteristic of Turner. With all the liberties which, for the sake of composition or effect, he allowed himself to take with the topography of a city or a landscape, he rarely failed to aim at giving the essentials of its " Look." (6) On one of Hythe (' Southern Coast,' 1824), in the same collection: " You ask me for my opinion ; first, I shall say in general very good; secondly, the figures at Barracks excellent, but I think you have cut up the bank called Shorncliff [sic] too much with the graver, by lines which are equal in strength and width and length, that give a coarseuess to the quality, and do not look like my touches or your work, like hooks to the good part over which they are put. The marsh is all swamp; I want flickering lights upon it up to the sea, and although I have darkened the sea in part, yet you must not consider it to want strength, but that the whole marsh and sea down to the ENGRA VED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. Ixxiii canal before the Barracks lies dark and not clear; get it into one tone, flat by dots or some means, and let the sea and water only appear different by their present lines. [Signed], J. M. W. Turner." (7) On one of Clovelly (' Southern Coast,' 1824), in the possession of the writer:. " Mr. Miller, soften down the Edges of the clouds generally between the shadows an half-tones, and as a word of advice aim at softness or union of the lines a little more. The Eocky bank above and East side of the Town and to the point X [pencil mark on proof J thick wood down to the Edge of silvery tone below the precipice to the Sea. [Illegible] foreground [illegible] the only place behind it, Lundy Island too high. Make the lights in the Clouds scratched out, brilliant. . . . J. M. W. T." (8) On a proof of the vignette of Hotel de Ville, Paris (Scott's Prose Works, 1834-5), in the possession of the writer : "The sky must be all made flat; the white paper taken away and the white reduced to a light tone, it doth [sic] no good to the Building but harm in its present state, and the whole of the Building not rich enough of Ornament (it looks in Nature like Lace), niches and figures between on the Second Story. Window dressings, tops [here is a sketch] and upper or garrett windows particularly rich, loaded with small ornaments and f oliage ; Large figures supported by the Clock, Sun-dial and Globe above. In short your building is too much cut up by lines [thus], too much architecture made out which makes it look poor instead of Eich. ... I fear I must trouble you to send it to me again. [Signed] J. M. W. T." (9) On one of Durham Cathedral ('England and Wales,' 1836), in the Print Eoom of the British Museum: " All the Bank covered with Trees down to the Eiver Edge. I want [illegible] Large Trees to be made out. Excuse my saying everything you try to [make] out by single line only, "l- / Ixxiv ENGRA VED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. and that way too frequently done without Form, has nothing characteristic of light and shadow. I must beg [you] to see [me] with this again." (10) The following is interesting as showing the care which Eogers himself took over the illustrations to his Poems. On the margin of a trial proof of St. Anne's Hill in my possession, Turner has written to the engraver, Goodall : " Mr. Eogers brought me this, wishing it to be made richer of flowers. I therefore sent for the Drawing tho' I suppose you have not done all you intend by [your] not having sent this to me. N.B. Make the trellis work thicker, the large Tree more made out by work thus [here is a pencil sketch], light not heavy." Bound the arbour Turner, following Eogers's sugges tion, has added in pencil: "Many more roses." EXPLANATOKY NOTES EXPLANATORY NOTES. The Catalogue which follows embraces all the engravings by and after Turner which were published or projected in his lifetime, together with certain others which were executed not long after his death, mainly by engravers who had worked under him. They are arranged under the following heads : Part I. LINE ENGEAVINGS. Part II. MEZZOTINTS. Part III. AQUATINTS, PLAIN AND COLOUEED. Part IV. LITHOGEAPHS AND CHEOMO-LITHOGEAPHS. Descriptions. — A detailed description is given of each engrav ing along with (a) its dimensions; (6) the name of its engraver; (c) the date of publication; (d) the distinguishing marks of its various ' States ' ; and (e) the present whereabouts of the Picture or Draw ing from which it is taken, so far as this is known to the writer. In some instances, notes are added as to the history, intention, or points of interest connected with the print. Order. — The order of arrangement is as far as possible chrono logical. In the case of serial issues of books or prints extending over several years, the date of publication of the first plate usually fixes the place of the series. This should be borne in mind, as other wise works of different character and date will seem to overlap one another. In several serials — ' The Southern Coast ' for example — the plates were first issued in the order in which they happened to be engraved, independently of topography, but on the completion of the work were re-arranged in geographical order. In this instance it seemed best to adhere to the original, chronological numbering, but lxxvii Ixxviii ENGRA VkD WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. in the majority of cases, where the differences in date between the original and the re-arranged order were trifling, it appeared more convenient to number the plates as they were finally published. Titles. — The original titles are adhered to throughout. Dimensions. — The large majority of Turner's landscapes being oblong in shape, the figures of the width (or length) always precede those of the height. The measurements given are those of the innermost plate line. In the case of Vignettes, they represent ap proximately the greatest width and the greatest height. Point of View. — The point of view is always that of the spec tator. What he sees to his right or his left will be described in every case as ' right ' or ' left.' Engraving Processes and Terms. — The methods employed in Line Engraving and Mezzotinting, and the tools used in each process are described in the Introduction (pp. 3-9). For similar in formation as to Aquatint, Etching, Lithography, andChromo-Litho- graphy, the reader is referred to ' Hamerton's Graphic Arts,' and other works on engraving. ' Engraving,' ' Print,' and ' Plate,' how used. — To avoid constant repetition it has been necessary to employ these three words continually and interchangeably in their general sense, i.e., to denote any kind of engraving, at any stage. For the use of the word ' Print,' in its technical sense, see a later paragraph. 'Proofs ' and ' States.' — Owing to there being no recognized universal system of nomenclature for the various stages of an engraving, the word ' Proofs ' has been and still is used with so many different meanings, that it is difficult to give a clear explana tion without appearing unduly prolix: — Primarily, a ' Proof ' meant an impression taken by or for the engraver of a plate, at any stage during its execution, to prove (or show) how far his work had progressed, and whether or not it satisfied him. Such impressions are still rightly known as ' Trial Proofs,' or ' Progressive Proofs.' Sometimes also they are called ' Engravers' Proofs,' but this term is frequently also specially applied to the impressions taken immediately after the completion EXPLANATORY NOTES. lxxix of a plate. A certain number of these — usually about eight — have always been the recognized perquisites of the engraver; they were often called ' Presentation Proofs,' as it was customary among the old engravers to exchange them amongst themselves or present them to friends. In Turner's later time, the first issue of an engraving usually went by the name of ' Artist's Proofs,' each copy often being signed by the artist (who received a fee for every signature), as well as by the engraver; these were always of high quality. Sometimes again they were known as ' Subscribers' Proofs,' subscriptions having been obtained for them before publication. This first issue (which was generally a very limited one) was often followed by another called ' Proofs before Letters ; ; these bore both the painter's and the engraver's names, but neither the Title, Dedication nor Publication lines had as yet been added. Again, the first impressions of a plate were often printed on a very fine paper made in Japan, which, having been introduced into Europe by way of India had become known as 'India Paper,' and the impressions taken on it were called ' India Paper Proofs,' or ' India Proofs.' It will be readily seen that all these varied applications of the word ' Proof ' have destroyed the original, definite meaning named above. And further, the terms ' Proofs ' and ' Engravers' Proofs ' have for a long time been confused in ordinary use, mainly owing to the following reasons: — From the first, early impressions from engraved plates have been keenly sought for by connoisseurs and collectors, on account of their great superiority to all those which follow. No doubt the earliest Trial Proofs are frequently imperfect, and, especially in the case of Mezzotints, often so heavily charged with ink as seriously to impair their effect; yet, with all engravings on copper, when once a plate is fairly advanced under the engraver's hand, the im pressions taken from it just before and just after completion, have an interest and a quality which distinguish them from all later ones. This is peculiarly the case with Mezzotints, as the last delicate, all-important touches of the engraver on the light parts, and the rich, velvety effect of the darks — which together give what is known technically as the ' bloom ' — both wear away with extra ordinary rapiditv in printing, owing to the softness of the metal. Ixxx ENGRA VED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. With Line Engravings, the deterioration is slower and less marked, but none the less certain. The earliest impressions pos sess a luminousness, a ' silveriness,' which soon disappear as print ing goes on. In both cases the cause of deterioration is obvious. With a Mezzotint, the friction of the printing wears away the minute raised points on the copper which catch the ink. With a Line Engraving, it breaks down the edges of the furrows cut in the copper, and the lines on the print consequently cease to be sharp and clear; the ink also, no longer confined in the furrows, gradu ally spreads over their edges on to the hitherto clear, white spaces between the lines. It is to these clear, white spaces and sharp lines, that the ' silveriness ' and luminousness of the engraving are due. It is not difficult, therefore, to understand the demand which has always existed for ' Early Proofs ' of all engravings on copper. The true connoisseur recognizes not only their intrinsic beauty, but also the fact that they and they alone display the handiwork of the artist-engraver in its pristine condition. Accordingly he is willing to pay what may seem a high price for them; not, as is sometimes supposed, on account of their mere rarity, but because to his trained eye, one such impression gives higher pleasure than a score of ordinary ones. But, as usual, demand creates supply. Often large numbers of impressions were printed from a plate straight away, all to be sold as ' Proofs ' or ' Engravers' Proofs.' At other times, when not only the good, but even the ordinary impressions of a print were ex hausted, if the demand for ' Proofs ' still continued, unscrupulous dealers erased from the copper-plate the lettering or other marks denoting its real ' State,' and issued ' False Proofs,' from plates which were more or less worn out. So frequent did this become, that in 1847 the leading printsellers of the United Kingdom formed themselves into a ' Printsellers' Association,' the members of which undertook for the future to issue only a definite number of Proofs of each plate published by them, which number was in every case to be declared on the registration of the plate with the Association. All such Proofs were required to be stamped with the seal of the Association, and the members bound themselves henceforward to deal in no new engravings which did not bear that stamp. By this EXP LA NATORY NO TES. lxxxi means they soon succeeded in putting an end to a large amount of roguery. It should be added that the above remarks do not apply to en gravings on Steel. Here the conditions are entirely different. The metal is so hard that often hundreds of impressions can be printed before any appreciable deterioration can be detected. The word ' States,' like ' Proofs,' is also used with different meanings. Sometimes — as in the case of Eembrandt's Etchings — it denotes the actual order of each impression taken from a plate ; the earliest Trial Proof being the ' First State,' the next the ' Second State,' and so on. This however is apt to lead to a need less multiplication of ' States,' often with very trifling differences between them. In other cases, the ' States ' of a plate begin only when it is completed, all impressions previously taken being con sidered as ' Trial Proofs ' or ' Engravers' Proofs.' Principle adopted in the present Catalogue. — To avoid the confusion referred to above, I have followed the system which I believe was first introduced in my ' Catalogue of Turner's Liber Studiorum,' and which has since been adopted by other writers. It is simply that all impressions taken from a plate before publica tion are classed as ' Engravers' Proofs' and, as such, described in their order. Then comes the ' First Published State,' followed by the Second, and, where they exist, the later ' States.' I think this method will be found as clear and simple in working as any. ' Prints,' ' Late States,' and ' Reprints.' — When an en graved plate begins to show signs of wear, it is at once re-touched or repaired by the engraver, and often in this, its ' Second State,' and even in later States, it is still a creditable work of art. In Turner's time, the impressions of the Second or sometimes of later States were usually termed 'Prints.' But the majority of his engravings were illustrations to books, some of which went through many editions after the plates illustrating them had become quite worn out. The latter were re- worked from time to time, to keep as far as possible some semblance of their original appearance, but not infrequently they passed finally into the hands of publishers who used them long after they had become mere wrecks. In many cases, the original lettering was allowed to remain unaltered; lxxxii ENGRA VED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. consequently quite worthless impressions are at times to be met with bearing apparently the marks of States which were originally good, and may be described as such in this Catalogue. Against these, the collector's eye is his only protection. The Preliminary (or ' Open ') Etchings. — In the case of the very early prints after Turner, so few of the ' Open Etchings ' have survived, that I have thought it desirable to mention the instances known to me. But from ' The Southern Coast ' onwards — say from 1812 — they appear to have been printed in considerable numbers, and often to have been issued along with the First Pub lished State. As they are usually of little interest (see Introduc tion, pp. xii, xiii), I have not thought it necessary after that date to allude to them, and their existence will always be assumed. There is, however, one difficulty in dealing with them. Whilst with every plate there must always be a definite point where the ' Open Etch ing ' ends and the ' Engraver's Proofs ' begin, i.e., before the en graver has commenced to work with his burin or dry-point — yet impressions are continually to be met with in which the amount of that work is so very slight, that although, strictly speaking, they are ' Engravers' Proofs,' they still do not merit notice. So great indeed was the number of Proofs which Turner usually required from his engravers before he was satisfied with their work, that the limits of time and space prevent my describing any but the most important. Previous Lists of Turner Prints. — The only virtually con temporary list is that drawn up by the late Mr. Charles Stokes of Gray's Inn, the painter's stockbroker and friend, who was an inde fatigable collector of his engravings. This list is printed in an Appendix to Thornbury's ' Life of Turner,' ' and although it contains several inaccuracies and a few omissions, it is fairly complete. A Catalogue, chiefly founded on it, has recently (1906) appeared in the ' Handbook to an Exhibition of Line Engravings after Turner held in the Fogg Art Museum of Harvard University, Cambridge, U.S.A.' This Exhibition was arranged by Mr. Francis Bullard, of Boston, U.S.A., who compiled the Handbook and contributed to it an interesting Introduction and many valuable notes. 1 For remarks as to this book see Introduction, p. xxvii. EXPLANATORY NOTES. lxxxiii Engravings erroneously ascribed to Turner. — There are a few prints, mostly small and unimportant, which pass as being after Turner, but, in the writer's opinion, incorrectly. A list of these will be appended at the end of the Catalogue. Owners of Drawings. — Many of these are taken from Mr. Edward Dillon's excellent list at the end of Sir Walter Armstrong's ' Life of Turner.' It is needless, however, to add that the drawings are continually changing hands, and from this and other causes, it is impossible to be more than approximately correct. Collections. — The initial letters below denote the various cok lections which will be referred to in the course of the Catalogue. There are doubtless others unknown to me. B. Mr. Francis Bullard, Boston, U.S.A. BM. British Museum (Print Eoom). MT. Mr. C. Mallord Turner. E. The Writer's collection. T. The Trustees of the late Mr. John Edward Taylor. Th. Mr. H. S. Theobald, K.C. TW. The late Lord Tweedmouth. (This collection has recently passed into the possession of Mr. C. Mallord Turner.) Abbreviations. — 'B.a.l.' — before or without any letters. Eom.' — Eoman (type). ' Caps ' — capitals. ' Pub.' — published. LIST OF ENGEAVINGS AFTEE J. M. W. TUBNEB, E.A. PUBLISHED OR PROJECTED DURING HIS LIFE-TIME, TOGETHEE WITH OTHEES PUBLISHED AFTEE HIS DEATH BUT EXECUTED MAINLY BY ENGEAVEES WHO HAD WOEKED UNDEE HIM PAET I. LINE ENGEAVINGS. Sect. A. Line Engravings on Copper. Sect. B. Line Engravings on Steel. Sect. C. Line Engravings or Late Date and mostly or Large Size; some on Copper and some on Steel. Sect. D. Line Engravings on Steel executed after Turner's Death, mainly by Engravers who had worked under him. PAET II. MEZZOTINTS. PAET III. AQUATINTS. PAET IV. LITHOGEAPHS AND CHEOMO-LITHOGEAPHS. PART I.— LINE ENGRAVINGS Section A. — Line Engravings on Copper DATE. SIZE. 1794 6ix4| 1794 6ix4§ 1795 6£x4i 1795 6fx4f 1795 6fx4J 1795 6Jx4i 1796 6fx4| 6|x4§ 1796 1797 6fx4f 1797 6fx4j| 1797 6ix4§6|x4J 1797 1797 6Jx4i 1798 6Jx4i 1798 6|x4} 1797 6Jx4a 1795 4ix2f 1795 4ix2f 1795 4jx2J 1795 4£x2§ 1795 4i x 2 J 1795 4|x2f 1795 4l*2i 1795 4ix2| 1795 4£x2f 1795 4Jx2i 1795 4Jx2f 1795 4ix2f 1795 4Jx2f 1795 4ix2f 1796 4§x2f 4x2| 1796 2 3456 7 89 10 11 12131415 15a 161718 19 20 21 222324 25262728 293031 I. 'The Copper-Plate Magazine' and 'The Itinerant,' 1794-1798 Rochester Chepstow Nottingham Bridgenorth Matlock Birmingham Chester Peterborough Ely Westminster Bridge Flint, from Parkgate Hampton Court, Herefordshire Carlisle Wakefield Sheffield Elgin Cathedral II. ' The Pocket Magazine,' ' Ladies' Pocket Magazine,' and ' Pocket Print 1795-1796 The Tower of London Chelsea Hospital Oxford Cambridge Windsor ¦ Flint Bath Worcester Wallingford Tunbridge Swansea Guildford Neath Staines Bristol Northampton lxxxvii Walker and Storer StorerJ. Walker J. Walker J. Widnell StorerJ. Walker J. Walker J. Waller J. Walker J. Walker J. Walker J. Walker J. Walker J. Walker J. Walker T. Tagg StorerT. Tagg T. Tagg RothwellT. Tagg G. Murray Rothwell T. Tagg G. Murray RothwellRothwellG. Murray G. Murray T. Tagg T. Tagg Ixxxviii LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. ENGRAVER. 3233 34353637 38 39 40 41 4243 4445464738a to 47a 4849 50 51 5253545556 III. Howlett's 'Selection of Views in the County of Lincoln,' 1797-1801 Grantham Church Sleaf ord Church IV. Isle of Wight Series, 1799 Orchard Bay Freshwater Bay Alum Bay, Isle of Wight Alum Bay and the Needles V. Oxford Almanacks, 1799-1811 South View of Christ Church, etc., from the Meadows View of the Chapel and Hall of Oriel College Inside View of the East End of Merton College Chapel A View of Worcester College, etc A View from the Inside of Brazen Nose College Quadrangle View of Exeter College, All Saints' Church, etc., from the Turl Inside View of the Hall of Christ Church View of Oxford from the South side of Hed- dington Hill View of the Cathedral of Christ Church and part of Corpus Christi College Part of Balliol College Quadrangle Va. The Small Replicas of the foregoing in Skelton's ' Oxonia Antigua Restaurata,' 1820-1823 ... VI. Views of Dunster Castle, Somersetshire, 1800 Dunster Castle, Somersetshire, North-East View Dunster Castle, Somersetshire, South- West View Dunster Castle (Small plate) VII. Some Book Unknown, 1800 Winchester Cross VIII. Whitaker's ' History of the Parish of Whalley,' 1800-1801 Seals of Whalley Abbey Ancient Crosses at Whalley Distant View of Whalley Abbey Cloisters of Whalley Abbey Whalley Abbey (Nearer View) . . . 179718011799 17991801180218041805 1806180718081811 1809 18001800 p 1800 1800 18001800 18001800 7 x 5} 7*x 5 10 x 7f 10 x 7 10 x n 10 x 7i 17fxl2f17fxl2|17|xl2|17|xl317fxl2f17fxl2f17|xl3i17|xl2f 17fxl2f17|xl2f about 9x7 14fx 9f 1Q x 9| 6|x 4 6i x 9 xl2 8 xlOJ 10i x 7! 10i x 7 10 x 7 B. Howlett B. Howlett J. Landseer J. Landseer J. Landseer J. Landseer J. Basire J. Basire J. Basire J. Basire J. Basire J. Basire J. Basire J. Basire J. Basire Storer J. Skelton S. Rawle S. Rawle S. Rawle J. Powell J. Basire J. Basire J. Bashe J. Basire J. Basire LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. lxxxix ENGRAVER. 57585960 61 62 63 64 65 66 6768 69 7071 72 737475 76 77 78 Clitheroe from Eadsford Bridge Browshohne Townley Hall Stoneyhurst Sherburne Chapel in Mitton Church IX. Angus' ' Seats of the Nobility and Gentry,' 1798-1810 Fonthill House, Wiltshire X. Britton and Brayley's 'Beauties of Eng land and Wales,' 1801-1816 Hampton Court, Herefordshire XI. Wharton's 'Essays on Gothic Architec ture,' 2nd Edition, 1802 Durham Cathedral, Interior XII. Byrne's 'Britannia Depicta,' 1803-1810 Wiekham, from the Marlow Road . . . Eton, from the Slough Road Abingdon, from the Thames Navigation Newbury, from Speen Hill Donnington Castle Distant View of Chester Part of Chester Castle XIII. Storer and Greig's 'Select Views of London and its Environs,' 1804-1805 Windsor from the Forest, Berks XIV. Mawman's ' Excursion to the Highlands of Scotland and the English Lakes,' 1805 Inverary Loch Lomond Patterdale XV. Britton's 'Fine Arts of the English School,' 1811 Pope's Villa XVI. Whitaker's 'History of Craven,' 2nd Edition, 1812 South Transept of Fountains Abbey, Yorkshire XVII. 'British Gallery of Pictures— Stafford Gallery,' 1808 A Fishing Smack with a Boat (' Dutch Boats in a Gale ') 18001800180018011801 1800 1801 1802 1803180318051805180518101810 1804 180518051805 1811 1812 1812 10 x 10* x 10 x 101 x 6i 10i x 6| f6& 7fx 5£ 6x4 4ix 6| tyx 8|x Six8|x 8ix 8fx J. Basire J. Basire J. Basire J. Basire J. Basire W. Angus J. Storer S. Porter W. Byrne W. Byrne W. Byrne W. Byrne W.& L.Byrne W. Byrne W. Byrne 5fx 7* 6 x 6 x 6 x 4i 9 x 6J 10 x 71 9 x 6£ J. Greig J. Heath J. Heath J. Heath Pye & Heath J. Basire J. Fittler 9 LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. NO. DATE. SIZE. 1812 23|xl6 1828 HJx n 1818 23ixl5f 1814 5 x 3| 1814 8 x 5f 1816 Hfx 8| 1816 c. 7 x 5J 1816 10 x 7 18161816 9fx 6f llfx 7f 1814 18141814181418141814181418151815 8fx 5| 8|x 5| 8fx 5| 8|x 5f 8ix 5f 8^x 5| 8Jx 5| 9x68i* 5f 18161816 9£x 61 9*x 61 181618201817 9fx 6f 9 x 6| 9|x 6 J 18171817181718181818 9fx 61 9Jx 61 C. VX 41 91 x 6| n>< 61 79 79a 8081 8283 /84 85 8687 8889 9091 92 939495 96 97 98 99a 100 101 102103 104105 XVIII. Single Plate High Street, Oxford (The Large Plate) High Street, Oxford (The Small Replica) XIX. Single Plate A View of Oxford from the Abingdon Road . . . XX. 'The Lady and Gentleman's Annual Pocket Ledger,' 1814 RedclifEe Church, Bristol XXI. Britton's ' Architectural Antiquities of Great Britain,' 1805-1826 Crypt in Kirkstall Abbey, Yorkshire XXII. Whitaker's 'Loidis and Elmete,' 1816 Harewood House Flower-garden Porch at Farnley (Vignette Etching) Gateway to the Flower-garden Porch at Famley (Etching) Bay Wmdows in the Flower Garden at Farnley (Etching) Gledhow XXIII. Cooke's 'Picturesque Views of the Southern Coast of England,' 1814-1826 St. Michael's Mount, Cornwall Poole, Dorsetshire Land's End, Cornwall Weymouth, Dorsetshire Lulworth Cove, Dorsetshire Corfe Castle, Dorsetshire Lyme Regis, Dorsetshire Teignmouth, Devonshire Dartmouth, Devonshire The Mew Stone at the Entrance of Plymouth Sound, Devonshire Falmouth Harbour, Cornwall Plymouth Dock from Mount Edgecomb, Dev onshire Ditto (Replica) Plymouth, with Mount Batten Pendennis Castle and the Entrance of Fal mouth Harbour, Cornwall Bow and Arrow Castle, Isle of Portland Martello Tower at Bexhill (Vignette) East and West Looe, Cornwall Ilf racomb, North Devon Middiman, Pye, & Heath W.E.Albutt Pye & Heath J. Pye J. Scott J. Scott UnknownUnknownUnknown G. Cooke B. Cooke Cooke Cooke B. Cooke B. Cooke Cooke B. Cooke Cooke B. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. Miller W. B. Cooke G. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. NO. ENGRAVER. 106107108 109110111112 113114115116 117 118119120 121 122123 124125126127 128 129130131 132133134135136 137138139140 141142 143 144 145 Tintagel Castle, Cornwall Watchet, Somersetshire Bridport, Dorsetshire Entrance of Fowey Harbour, Cornwall Lulworth Castle, Dorsetshire Torbay from Brixham Minehead and Dunster Castle, Somersetshire Margate, Kent Rye, Sussex Clovelly Bay, Devonshire St. Mawes, Cornwall Ramsgate, Kent Hythe, Kent Comb Martin Portsmouth, Hampshire Boscastle, Cornwall ,. Brighthelmstone, Sussex Folkstone, Kent Deal, Kent Mount Edgecomb, Devonshire Dover from Shakespeare's Cliff Whitstable, Kent XXIV. Cooke's ' Views in Sussex,' 1816-1820 Emblematical Frontispiece on Wrapper of Part I (Etching) Battle Abbey, the spot where Harold fell Brighthng Observatory, from RosehUl Park The Vale of Ashburnham Pevensey Bay, from Crowhurst Park The Vale of Heathfield Bodiham Castle, Sussex Hurstmonceux Castle (Open Etching only) Winchelsea (Ditto) XXV. Cooke's 'Rivers of Devon,' 1815-1823 Plymouth Citadel Plymouth Sound Ivy Bridge, Devonshire Source of the Tamar and Torridge XXVI.Surtees"HistoryofDurham,'1816-1823Hylton Castle, co. of Durham Gibside, co. of Durham Raby Castle XXVII. Hakewill's 'Picturesque Tour in Italy,' 1818-1820 The Rialto, Venice* Cascade of Terni * 181818201820 1820182118211821182418241824182418241824 182518251825 182518261826182618261826 1816 1819 18191816 18161818 1817 18201817 1815 181518161816 1820 18191820 9i x 61 9§x 6£ 9i x 6| 91 x 6i 91 x 61 9*x 6-l! 8|x 6ij 9£x 6l! 91 x 5fj 8|x 5^j 8|x 5| 9ix 6 9Jx 5| 9i x 6 91 x 61 91 x 5| 9£x 6 9|x 5£ 91 x 5| 9^x 6| 91 x 64 7 x 91 x 11 x 11 x 11 x llixHlx 114 x 88x n ni.. ... lllx 71 Uix 8J 12£x 8i 11 x 7$ 11 x 71 H x 7| 1820 8|x 5£ 1819 51 x 8| G. Cooke G. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke G. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke G. Cooke E. Goodall W. Miller J. C. Allen R. Wallis G. Cooke W. Miller W. Miller E. Goodall G. Cooke R. Wallis W.Radclyffe' E. Goodall G. Cooke Horsburgh ? Turner W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke W. B. Cooke J. C. Allen W. B. Cooke S. Rawle S. Rawle S. Rawle J. Pye J. Landseer LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. ENGRAVER. 146147148149 150151152153154155156157158159160161 162 163 164 165166167168 168a 169 170171172173174175176 177178179180 XXVII. Hakewill's ' Tour in Italy ' — continued Bridge at Narni Rome, Bridge and Castle of St. Angelo The Roman Forum from the Capitol The Forum Romanum * Rome, from the Farnese Gardens Rome, from the Monte Testaccio Rome, from Monte Mario Rome, Tomb of Cecilia Metella La Riccia Lake of Nemi Naples, from the Mole * Florence, from the Ponte AUa Carraia Florence, from the Chiesa al Monte Florence from Fiesole * Isola Bella, on the Lago Maggiore . . . Turin from the Portico of the Superga Church * For the Small Replicas of these, see XLIId, XLHg, XLIIh, XLIIl, ' Annuals.' XXVIII. AUason's ' Antiquities of Pola,' 1819 Antiquities at Pola (Frontispiece) XXIX. Catalogue of Mr. Fawkes' Gallery, 1819-1820 Mr. Fawkes' Gallery Frontispiece (Vignette Etching) XXX. Five Engravings on Copper, of Un known Date and Origin Parnassus Little Devil's Bridge (Copy of the Liber plate) View of a Country House Arthington Mill on the Wharf e. Unfinished . . . Sheerness and Isle of Sheppey (Ditto) XXXI. Whitaker's 'History of Richmond shire,' 1818-1823 Richmond, Yorkshire Richmond Castle and Town St. Agatha's Abbey, Easby Aske Hall High Force, or Fall of the Tees Egglestone Abbey, near Barnard Castle. . . Junction of the Greta and Tees at Rokeby Brignall Church Wycliffe, near Rokeby Merrick Abbey, Swaledale Aysgarth Force Simmer Lake, near Askrigg 18191818181818201820181918201819 181918191820 1818 1820181918181820 1819 18191820 1819182018221820 1822 1822 18191822 1823182218201822 8fx 5* 8|x 51. 8fx 5i 82 x 5f 8£x 5 1. 8*x 51 81 x 51. 8ix 5£ 8fx 5| 8|x 5| 8J x 5£ 8|x 5£ 8fx 51 8J x 5| 81 x 51 8|x 5* S. Middiman G. Hollis G. Cooke Hollis & Mitan J. Le Keux J. Byrne J. Byrne J. Byrne J. Pye Middiman &Pye G. Cooke S. Rawle G. Cooke W. R. Smith J. Fittler J. Mitan lOfx 7J G.Cooke 8fx 61 H.Moses c. 61x41 F.C.Lewis 4£x3 6^x4 7fx5&7ix5Ja 14*8£ 10£ x 11 x lllx 11 x lOfx 10fx W. B. Cooke Unknown J. Basire J. C. Allen J. Fisher W. R. Smith J. Archer J. Le Keux J. Scott J. Landseer T. Higham J. Pye S. Rawle J. Pye J. C. Varrall J. Scott 7| H. Le Keux LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. ENGRAVER. 181 182183184 185186187188 189190191 192193194 195 196 197 198 199200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 Moss Dale Fall Hardraw Fall Crook of Lune, looking towards Hornby Castle Ingleborough, from Hornby Castle Terrace . . . Hornby Castle, from Tatham Church Kirhy Lonsdale Churchyard Heysham and Cumberland Mountains Weathercote Cave XXXII. 'Provincial Antiquities of Scot land,' 1819-1826 Edinburgh Castle (Vignette Title to Vol. I) ... Crichton Castle * Borthwick Castle Edinburgh, High Street Edinburgh from the Calton Hill Edinburgh from Leith Harbour (Vignette Title to Vol. II) Heriot's Hospital, Edinburgh Roslyn Castle * Dunbar Tantallon Castle * Linlithgow Palace Bass Rock * For the Small Replicas of Nos. 190, 196, and 198, see XLIX, ' Tilt's Illustrations to Scott' XXXIII. Stevenson's 'Account of the Bell Rock Lighthouse,' 1824 Bell Rock Lighthouse (Frontispiece) XXXIV. Single Plate Ehrenbreitstein, during the Demolition of the Fortress XXXV. Single Plate Cologne XXXVI. Hoare's ' History of Modern Wilt shire' Wilton House XXXVII.The Custom House Old London Bridge and Vicinity (Companion Plate) XXXVIIL Single Plate Tivoli, a Composition 182218181821 1822182218221822 1822 1826 1819 181918191820 1826 182218221824 182218221826 lOfxlOfx 11 x lOfxlOfx11 x 10|x101 x ,5x 6 9fx 6% 9fx 6f 9|x 61 10 x 6J c.71x 7i 9£x 6f 9|x 6] 10£x 6( 91 x 6| 91 x 10 x S. Middiman J. Pye J. Archer C. Heath W.Radclyffe C. Heath W. R. Smith S. Middiman G. Cooke G. Cooke H. Le Keux Le Keux & Cooke G. Cooke R. Wallis H. Le Keux W. R. Smith J. C. Allen E. Goodall R. Wallis W. Miller 1824 1824 1824 1825182718271827 8fx 5 lit x 71. 18fxl31 9 x6f 9fx5J10Jx7 23fxl5£ J. Horsburgh J. C. AUen E. GoodaU T. Higham J. C. AUen E. Goodall E. GoodaU LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. ENGRAVER. 208 209210211212213214215216 217218 219 220 221 222223224225226227228229 .230 231232 233234 235 236237238239240241242243244245 246 247248249 250251 XXXIX. Single Plate The Temple of Jupiter PanheUenius in the Island of Egina XL. 'Picturesque Views in England and Wales,' 1827-1838 Rivaulx Abbey, Yorkshire Lancaster, from the Aqueduct Bridge Dartmouth Cove Bolton Abbey, Yorkshire Colchester, Essex FaU of the Tees, Yorkshire Richmond, Yorkshire ... Launceston, CornwaU . . . Barnard Castle, Durham Saltash, CornwaU Aldborough, Suffolk ... Orford, Suffolk Straits of Dover Prudhoe Castle, Northumberland ... VaUe Crucis Abbey, Denbighshire . . . Buckfastleigh Abbey, Devonshire . . . Entrance to Fowey Harbour, CornwaU Okehampton, Devonshire Lancaster Sands Knaresborough, Yorkshire Malmsbury Abbey, Wiltshire Kilgarren Castle, Pembroke Exeter Richmond, Yorkshire [From the Moors] Louth, Lincolnshire Great Yarmouth, Norf oik Stone Henge, Wiltshire Hampton Court Palace Devonport and Dockyard, Devonshire Dunstanborough Castle, Northumberland Carisbrook Castle, Isle of Wight Cowes, Isle of Wight Stamford, Lincolnshire Alnwick Castle, Northumberland Holy Island, Northumberland ... Stoneyhurst, Lancashire Winchelsea, Sussex Trematon Castle, CornwaU St. Mawes, CornwaU Walton Bridge, on Thames, Surrey Ludlow Castle, Shropshire Folkestone Harbour and Coast to Dover Tynemouth, Northumberland 252 : Gosport, Entrance to Portsmouth Harbour 1828 18271827182718271827182718271827182718271827 1827 1828182818281828 1829 182818281828182918291829182918291829182918291830183018301830183018301830183018301830 1830 1830 183118311831 1831 22fxl5 9ft x 6ft 9£x4 9 x 61. 9 x6l 9 x6ft 8*fx6A 9| x 6| 9ft x 6ft 9| x 6| 9£x6ft 9| x 6i 9ftx6|10 x6if 9ftx6£ 9£x6ft9£x6ft 9ft x 6ft »ft x 6ft 91x61. 9 x 6f 9*x6A 9ftx6£ 9ft x 6ft 9ft x 6ft 91. x 6i 10 x7ft 91x61 9ft x 6ft 9tx6ft 9ix6| 9f x 61. 9ft x 6ft 91 x 6f 9| x 61. 9|x6J 9f x6ft 9|x6ft9| x 6i 9fx6^ 91 x 6ft 9ft x 6ft 9ft x 6ft 9 x 6i 9ft x 6f J. Pye E. GoodaU R. Wallis W. R. Smith R. Wallis R. Wallis E. Goodall W. R. Smith J. C. Varrall R. Wallis W. R. Smith E. Goodall R. Brandard W. MiUer E. GoodaU J. C. VarraU R. Wallis W. R. Smith WiUmoreR. Brandard T. Jeavons J. O. VarraU WiUmoreT. Jeavons WiUmore W.Radclyffe W. MiUer R. Wallis C. Westwood T. Jeavons R. Brandard C. Westwood R. Wallis W. MiUer WiUmore Tombleson J. B. AUen J. HenshaU R. Wallis J. H. Kemot J. C. VarraU R. WaUis J. Horsburgh W. R. Smith R. Brandard LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. xcv ENGRAVER. 253 254255256257258259260261262 263 264 265 266267 268269270 271272273 274 275 276 277278279280281282283284285286 287288 289290 291 292293294 295 296297 298 299 300301 XL. ' England and Wales ' — continued. Windsor Castle, Berkshire Eton CoUege, Berkshire ... . Bedford, Bedfordshire Pembroke Caatle, Wales „ Richmond HiU and Bridge, Surrey ... . Malvern Abbey and Gate, Worcestershire . Plymouth, Devonshire Salisbury, WUtshire St. Catherine's Hill, near GuUdford, Sun-ey Chatham, Kent Margate, Kent Ashby de la Zouch, Leicestershire Warwick Castle, Warwickshire KenUworth Castle, Warwickshire Brinkbum Priory, Northumberland ... . Tamworth Castle, Staffordshire Ely Cathedral, Cambridgeshire Blenheim, Oxfordshire Castle Upnor, River Medway Laugharne Castle, Oaermarthenshire ... . Coventry, Warwickshire Nottingham, Nottinghamshire Carew Castle, Pembroke Penmaen-Mawr, Caernarvonshire Christ Church CoUege, Oxford Arundel Castle and Town, Sussex Llandberis Lake, Wales Leicester Abbey, Leicestershire Caernarvon Castle, Wales Dudley, Worcestershire Boston, Lincolnshire UUswater, Cumberland Powis Castle, Montgomery Worcester, Worcestershire Llanthony, Monmouthshire Longships Lighthouse, Lands End ... . Beaumaris, Isle of Anglesea Lyme Regis Harlech Castle, North Wales Flint Castle, North Wales Lowestoffe, Suffolk KidweUy Castle, South Wales Keswick Lake, Cumberland LlangoUen, North Wales Durham Cathedral Winander-mere, Westmoreland Whitehaven, Cumberland Crickieth Castle, North Wales Rochester, Stroud and Chatham, Medway, Kent 1831 18311831183118321832 183218301832183218321832183218321832183218331833 1833 18331833 1833 183418341834 183418341834 183518351835 1835 18361835 183618361836183618361836 18371837 1837183718361837 183718371838 9Jx6| 9$ x 6| 9ftx6| 9ft x 6ft 9 x 61 9| x 64 9i x 6ft 9Jx6ft 9ftx61 91 x5if 9f x6} 9ft x 6ft 9ft x 6ft 9ifx6ft 9f xf 9f x6ft 9Jx5if9fx6ft9f x6ft 9ijx 6i 9| x 6f 9ft x 6ft 8ifx6ft 8ifx6i9ft x 6ft H x6ft 9ftx5if 9Jx6J9f x 6| 9^x6f9§ x 6i 9Hx6i 9f x6ft 9§ x 6f 9*4 x 6ft 9£x6ft 10ft x 6§ 9ftx6| 91 x 6ft 9f x 6J 9|x6ft9| x 6 10ft x 6ft 9ft x 6ft 9f x 61 9ifx 6| 9ft x 6ft 9ft x 61 W. MiUer W.Radclyffe WiUmoreT. Jeavons W. R. Smith J.Horsburgh W. J. Cooke W.Radclyffe J. H. Kemot W. MiUer R. WaUis W.Radclyffe R. WaUis T. Jeavons J. C. VarraU WiUmore T. Higham W.Radclyffe J. B. Allen J.Horsburgh S. Fisher W. J. Cooke W. MiUer WiUmore J. Redaway T. Jeavons WiUmore W. R. Smith W.Radclyffe R. WaUis T. Jeavons WiUmore WiUmore T. Jeavons WiUmore W. R. Smith W. R. Smith T. Jeavons W. R. Smith J. H. Kernot W. R. Smith T. Jeavons W.Radclyffe WiUmore W. MiUer WiUmore W. R. Smith S. Fisher J. C. VarraU LINE ENGRA VINGS ON COPPER. ENGRAVER. 302 303 304 305306 307308309 310311312 XL. ' England and Wales ' — continued. Chain Bridge over the River Tees Richmond Terrace, Surrey Mount St. Michael, CornwaU XLI. The so-called " HoUoway's Continuation of ' England and Wales ' " (Unpublished) Lowestoffe Lighthouse (Vignette) Harborough Sands (Vignette) Orford Castle and Church (Vignette) Aldborough Dunwich (caUed in error Dymchurch) Orfordness Lowestoffe (Open Etching only) Whitby (Ditto) 183818381838 9f x 61 9igx6X "i x r x6ftx6fx 54. x6«x6j^x 7 x 7 x7J W. R. Smith WiUmore S. Fisher J. C. Allen J. C. AUen J. C. AUen J. C. AUen J. C. AUen J. C. AUen J. C. Allen J. C. AUen Section B. — Line Engravings on Steel 313 314 315 316317318 319320321322 323324 325326327328329330 XLII. Various ' Annuals,' 1826-1837 N.B. — It is possible that some of these were en graved on Copper, but the majority were on Steel. XLEU. 'The Bijou,' 1826 Mount Blanc XLIIb. 'The Literary Souvenir,' 1826-1831 Richmond HiU (See also ' The Amulet,' XLIId) Bolton Abbey, Wharfdale Buckfastleigh Abbey Norham Castle The Tower of London (See also ' How's Lays and Legends,' XLHl) XLIIc. 'The Keepsake," 1828-1837 Florence (See also ' Heath's GaUery,' XLIIk) Lake of Albano (Ditto) Lago Maggiore Virginia Water, No. I (Ditto) Virginia Water, No. II (Ditto) Saumur Nantes St. Germain-en-Laye Marly (See also ' Heath's GaUery,' XLIIk) ... Ehrenbreitstein (Ditto) FaUs of the Rhine Havre 1826 1826 1826 182718271831 1828182918291830 1830 1831183118321832183318331834 3tfx2i 4fx2H 4ftx21,4ftx2£ 4*fx3f 4ftx3 5*x3ft51 x 3ft 5**3ft 5ftx3f 5ftx3f5ftx3}4. 5ftx3f 5f x 3f Sftx3f 5| x3ft 5ftx3tt 5J x 3|- Davies E. GoodaU E. Finden R. WaUis P. Heath W. Miller E. GoodaU R. WaUis W. R. Smith R. WalliB R. WaUis R. WaUis WiUmore R. WaUis W. MiUer R. WaUis J. B. AUen R. WaUis LINE ENGRAVINGS ON STEEL. xcvii 331 332333334335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342343344345 346347 Palace of La BeUe GabrieUe (See also ' Heath's GaUery,' XLIIk) ... Burning of the Houses of ParUament (Vig nette) Fire at Sea (Vignette) The Wreck (Vignette) The Sea! The Sea! (Vignette) XLIId. 'The Amulet,' 1829-1831 Ehrenbreitstein Florence from the Chiesa al Monte Richmond HUl (See ' Literary Souvenir,' No. 314) XLIIk ' The Anniversary,' 1829 FonthiU XLIIf. ' Friendship's Offering,' 1830 Vesuvius in Eruption (See also same Plate under Title 'Bay of Naples,' No. 346.) XLIIo. ' The Remembrancer,' 1831 The Forum Romanum XLIIh. 'The Talisman,' 1831 Barnard Castle Forum Romanum (See 'Remembrancer,' No.340) XLIIr Some Annual or Annuals Unknown The Rialto, Venice (SmaU RepUca of No. 144) Cascade of Terni (Ditto of No. 145) Naples from the Mole (Ditto of No. 156) Florence from Fiesole (Ditto of No. 159) Bay of Naples (See 'Friendship's Offering,' No. 339) Temple of Egina XLIIk. Heath's ' Gallery of British Engrav ings,' 1836 Lake of Albano (See ' Keepsake,' No. 320) Florence Virginia Water, I Virginia Water, II EhrenbreitsteinPalace of La BeUe GabrieUe Marly (Ditto No. 319) (Ditto No. 322) (Ditto No. 323) (Ditto No. 328) (Ditto No. 331) (Ditto No. 327) 183418351835 1836 1837 1828 1831 1829 1830 1831 1831 18301830182718301830 ? 1836 5ix3if 3ftx4f 3| x 4£ 3ftx4J3Hx4if 41x2| 5ftx3ft 4fx22 4ifx3ft 4Jx3ft 4f x 2£ 2!fx4ft 4ftx2!i.4ftx2ft 4|x2f 4#x3 W. MiUer WiUmoreWiUmore H. Griffiths WiUmore J. Pye E. GoodaU T. Crostick T. Jeavons J. Henshall Willmore H. Adlard H. Adlard H. Adlard H. Adlard H. Adlard T. KeUy XLHl. How's ' Lays and Legends,' 1843 Tower of London (See 'Literary Souvenir,' No. 318) 1843 LINE ENGRAVINGS ON STEEL. ENGRAVER. 348349 350351 352 353354355356 357358359360361362363364365366367368 369370 371372 373374375376377 378 379 380381382383384385386387 388389390391392393 XLIII. Rogers's ' Italy,' 1830 (All Vignettes) The Lake of Geneva William TeU's Chapel St. Maurice Hospice of the Great St. Bernard (I) Hospice of the Great St. Bernard (II) Marengo Aosta Martigny Hannibal passing the Alps Lake of Como (I) Venice Florence GalUeo's ViUa ViUa Madama — Moonlight Rome, Castle of St. Angelo The Forum The Campagna of Rome TivoU PerugiaBandittiNaplesPaestum Amalfi A ViUa on the Night of a Festa di BaUo A FareweU — Lake of Como (II) XLIV. Rogers's ' Poems,' 1834 (All Vignettes) A Garden A Village — Evening The Gipsy Leaving Home Greenwich Hospital Keswick Lake St. Herbert's Chapel An Old Manor House . Tornaro A ViUage Fair Traitor's Gate — Tower of London St. Anne's HUl (I) A Hurricane in the Desert Venice, The Rialto — Moonlight Valombre St. Pierre's Cottage . Ste. JuUenne's Chapel. Captivity An Old Oak Shipbuilding (An Old Oak Dead) The Boy of Egremont 1830 1834 3f34 3i3i4 3ft x 3f x §4 31 34 34 3 3&313f343|23 ?i fI?1 xxXXXX XX XXX 24xl| 34x2|3i x 3 31x3n x2f 3f x31 31 x 2i 3ix2|3|x2f34x2i 31x2^ 31x2f 34 x 34 31 x 3f x 3J x E. GoodaU R. WaUis R. WaUis W. R. Smith W. R. Smith E. GoodaU H. Le Keux W. Cooke W. R. Smith E. GoodaU E. GoodaU E. Goodall E. GoodaU H. Le Keux R. WaUis E. GoodaU E. GoodaU J. Pye E. GoodaU R. WaUis E. GoodaU J. Pye R. WaUis E. GoodaU R. WaUis W. MiUer E. GoodaU E. GoodaU E. GoodaU E. Goodall E. GoodaU H. Le Keux W. MiUer R. WaUis E. GoodaU E. GoodaU E. GoodaU E. GoodaU W. MiUer E. GoodaU E. GoodaU E. Goodall E. GoodaU E. GoodaU E. GoodaU E. GoodaU LINE ENGRAVINGS ON STEEL. DATE. SIZE. 1834 34x2f JI 3^x3 , 3fx21 » 21 x 2f 3§ x 34 j 34x2| , 3Jx2| » 3 x 3| 3? x 24 9 4 x31 34x3| ' 34x21. 1832 6|x8ft J)J) 5| x 3f 5|x3f J) 5f x3H 51x4 1833 J» 5ftx3| it 5ft x3J 5| x 3i 1834 54x3f 1832 31x34. JJ 3Jx4 )) 3i x 3 34x31 „ 3|x2| 1833 3|x3J jj 3 x 3| JJ 34 x 2| )J 3ix2f JJ 31x3f >) 34x2 JJ 3| x31 „ 3f x 2} „ 3 x 31 jj 3f x 21 )J 3ix3^ JJ 3f x 2J 1833 34 x 5 )) 5fx3| ENGRAVER. 394395396 397398399 400401402403404405 406 407408 409410 411412413414415416417418419 420421 422423424425426427428429430431 432433 Bolton Abbey The Alps at Daybreak Loch Lomond St. Anne's HiU (II) Columbus and his Son Columbus setting Sail The Vision of Columbus Land Discovered by Columbus . . . The Landing of Columbus A Tempest — Voyage of Columbus Cortes and Pizarro Datur hora quieti XLV. 'Byron's Life and Works' (Murray Edition), 1832-1834 Gibraltar Malta The AcropoUs of Athens Temple of Minerva, Cape Colonna Tomb of Cecilia MeteUa Rhodes Drachenfels Cephalonia , Negropont Santa Maria della Spina, Pisa . . . Gate of Theseus, Athens The Plain of Troy Bacharach on the Rhine The Castle of St. Angelo Corinth from the AcropoUs The Bridge of Sighs, Venice . . . The Bernese Alps The WaUs of Rome (Tomb of Caius Sestus) Parnassus and Castalian Spring The Field of Waterloo (from Hougomont) Scio (Fontana de Melek, Mehmet Pasha) Genoa Cologne Santa Sophia, Constantinople The School of Homer, Scio The CasteUated Rhine XLVI. 'The Rivers of France,' 1833-1835:— XL VIa, ' Turner's Annual Tour— The Loire,' 1833 Nantes (Vignette Title) Orleans R. WaUis E. GoodaU W. MiUer E. GoodaU E. GoodaU E. Goodall E. GoodaU E. GoodaU E. GoodaU E. Goodall E. GoodaU E. GoodaU E. Finden E. Finden J. Cousen E. Finden E. Finden W. Finden W. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden E. Finden W. MUler T. Hisham LINE ENGRAVINGS ON STEEL. ENGRAVER. 434435436437438439440441442443444 445446 447 448449450451452 453454 455456457458459460461462463464 465 466467468469470471472 473474 XLVI. ' Rivers of France ' — continued. Beaugency , Blois Palace at Blois Amboise Chateau of Amboise Canal of the Loire and Cher, near Tours Tours St. Julian's, Tours Tours — Looking Backward Saumur Rietz, near Saumur Montjen St. Florent Between Clairmont and Mauves ... . Chateau Hamelin Scene on the Loire Clairmont Ooteaux de Mauves Chateau de Nantes XLVIb. * Turner's Annual Tour— The Seine,' 1834 Light Towers of the Heve (Vignette Title) Havre Havre, Tower of Francis I GraviUe Harfleur TancarvUle Chateau de TancarvUle, with Town of QuILta boeuf LiUebonne, Chateau and Tower LUlebonne, Chateau Caudebec Jumieges La Chaise de Gargantua, near Duclair Rouen, looking up the River Rouen, looking down the River" Rouen Cathedral Rouen, from St. Catherine's HUl . . . Chateau de la MaiUeraie Between QuUleboeuf and VUlequier QuiUeboeuf Honfleur XLVIc. ' Turner's Annual Tour— The Seine,' 1835 Chateau GaiUard, from the South (Vignette Title) .!. ... Chateau GaiUard, from the East 1833 1834 5ft x Sf 5ft x 344 5ftx3+£5ft x-A Study at MUlbank (Pubd. Moore, McQueen and Co.) ... Bay of Baiae, ApoUo and the Sibyl (Pubd. J. McQueen and Co.) ChUde Harold's Pilgrimage (Pubd. J. Mc Queen and Co.) Venice— the Bridge of Sighs (Pubd. Moore, McQueen and Co.) Venice — the Dogana, etc., Canaletti painting (Pubd. J. McQueen and Co.) The Approach to Venice (Pubd. J. McQueen and Co.) Ulysses deriding Polyphemus (Pubd. Rowney and Co.) Bacchus and Ariadne (Pubd. Gambart and Co.) The Fighting Temeraire (Pubd. Gambart and Co.) The Gothic Bridge at Eudes, Tours 18521852 1852 19 x 134 19 x 13f 24f x 22| IB. and G. / Leighton R. Camck 1852 St tt 13ft x 8f 16} x 11 15 x 104, J. Coventry Unknown Unknown J) 15ft x lOf Unknown 1856 23ft x 14f Unknown J> 234fxl3if Unknown ., 17} x 11} Unknown tt 324 x 194 J. C. Ogle t) 17| x 11$ Unknown Jt 27 x 18 J. C. Ogle tt diam. 18J Unknown 1858 " 20| x 16 12i x 8i Unknown J. C. Ogle PAET I.— LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER i ' THE COPPER-PLATE MAGAZINE ' and ' THE ITINERANT,' 1794-1798 The history of this small Serial, in which are to be found the earliest engravings after Turner, has already been given (Intro duction, pp. xviii, xix). The naive prefaces to the second and three succeeding volumes, in which the proprietors annually congratulate themselves on the loftiness of their aim, the excellent value they are giving their subscribers — the price of each number was only a shilling — and the deservedly large patronage which is being accorded to them, show that it must have been highly successful. On the completion of the five volumes in 1798, the plates were skilfully retouched, printed on better paper, and re-issued under the title of ' The Itinerant,' by which the book is now more generally known. This edition apparently also had a large sale. In 1853 (after Turner's death) the copper-plates were discovered at a marine store dealer's, and were bought by Hogarth the printseller. He had those after Turner and Girtin again retouched, and reprinted them, with an extremely interesting preface and biographies of both artists, under the title of 'Turner and Girtin's Picturesque Views Sixty Tears Since.' The prints, although somewhat modern ized by retouching, are still not without merit. In 1873, twenty years later, the plates, now quite worn out, were again reprinted, and published by Bentley under the name of ' Turner and Girtin's Picturesque Views a Hundred Tears Ago.' The Drawings show strongly the influence of Hearne and Dayes on Turner. Very few can now be traced, and most of these are faded. ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. 1. EOCHESTEE. Engraved by Walker and Storer. Size, 6^- by 4|. The city in distance across the Medway. Bridge to right. In foreground, two sailing barges moored by trees. Two men approach ing from right, carrying oars. The Open Etching. One impression. B. This is the only example I have met with in the Series. First Published State (' Copper- Plate Magazine,' Vol. II). Left, " Plate 55, Engraved by Walker and Storer from an original drawing by Turner." Eight, " Published May l8t 1794 by Harri son & Co., 18 Paternoster Eow London." Title in Eoman capitals, shaded. Second State (' The Itinerant '). The plate number removed. " The Itinerant" added at top to left, and the county [Kent in this case] to right. Publisher's name altered to " J. Walker, No. 16. Eosoman Street." There is a scarce large-paper (foUo) edition of this State, with the letterpress below each plate, and the ordinary (quarto) with the letterpress on separate pages. Reprint A ('Turner and Girtin's Picturesque Views Sixty Tears Since,' Hogarth, London, 1864). Inscription altered; in centre, below plate-line, " Engraved by J. Walker from a Drawing by W. Turner." Title in italics. Reprint B ('Turner and Girtin's Picturesque Views a Hundred Tears Ago,' Bentley, 1873). Lettering as in Eeprint A, but plates worn out and worthless. N.B. — As all the plates of the Series follow virtually the same lines, the above descriptions of States will not be repeated; a few trifling exceptions are noted. 2. CHEPSTOW. Engraved by Storer. 6J by 4*§. Euined castle on cliff above the Wye, which is crossed in centre by wooden bridge. Sailing-boat ashore on left. ' Copper-Plate Magazine,' Vol. II, PI. 67. Date, Nov. 1, 1794. I have seen an impression of this plate printed in two colours- blue and brown. See also Carlisle (No. 13). The Drawing was jn Sir Joseph Heron's Sale at Christie's in 1890. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. Chepstow had a great attraction for Turner in the early part of his career. He made four large drawings of it for Lord Harewood, and it was the subject of two plates of the 'Liber Studiorum.' 3. NOTTINGHAM. Engraved by J. Walker. 6\ by 4J. The Castle on hill to left; town on right. Eiver in foreground with barge lowering sail on entering lock. ' Copper-Plate Magazine,' Vol. II, PI. 75. Date, Feb. 28, 1795. Publisher's address in this and the succeeding plates is altered to " J. Walker, No 16 Eosomans Street, London." An outline etching of this subject is given in ' Modern Painters,' vol. iv, p. 29, where Mr. Euskin compares it with Turner's later Nottingham in his ' England and Wales.' 4. BEIDGENOETH. Engraved by J. Walker. 6| by 4| Stone bridge on left with tall gate-house on it. Town to right below hills. The Severn in front with many boats, from one of which a man and woman are fishing. ' Copper- Plate Magazine,' VoL II, PI. 88. Date, August 1, 1795. This is perhaps the most attractive plate of the Series. The composition is skilful and effective, and the old house on the bridge extremely interesting. The Drawing is beautiful in colour, and the broad yet delicate treatment of the broken surfaces of the masonry very noticeable. I do not know where it now is. 5. MATLOCK. Engraved by J. Widnell. 6-| by 4^. In centre, stone bridge with four arches; houses to left and right. High hills behind. Two horsemen by river in left fore ground, 'Copper-Plate Magazine,' Vol. II, PI. 90. Date, October 1, 1795. ENGRA VED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. 6. BIEMINGHAM. Engraved by Storer. 6^ by 4J. Town in mid-distance with conspicuous tall spire on left, and tower on right. In foreground, cart drawn by two horses on bank by stream. ' Copper-Plate Magazine,' Vol. II, PI. 91. Date, November 2, 1795. The Drawing was at one time in the possession of Mr. W. Ward, but he does not know its present whereabouts. This view, doubtless a fairly accurate one, of the Birmingham of 1795, is interesting to contrast with the Midland metropolis of to-day. 7. CHESTEE. Engraved by J. Walker. 6f by 4|. Brickfield in foreground with men wheeling barrows. Beyond it, the river, and the walls and towers of the city and castle. Bridge in right distance. ' Copper-Plate Magazine,' Vol. II, PI. 95. Date, January 1, 1796. 8. PETEEBOEOUGH. Engraved by J. Walker. 6J by 4| . The Cathedral seen from the north. Eoad in foreground with a woman on horseback and two others on foot beside her. ' Copper-Plate Magazine,' Vol. Ill, PI. 103. Date, May 1, 1796, " PL 103, Vol. Ill," in very small type at right top corner. The Vol. and PI. Nos. appear similarly on all the succeeding plates of the Series with the exception of Carlisle, No. 13. The Drawing is in my possession, and is one of the few still unfaded. It is very carefully executed, especially the dainty figures. I have also a large-paper copy of the Engraving, coloured by hand (probably by Turner), and closely following the Drawing. 9. ELT. Engraved by J. Walker. 6f by 4|. The Cathedral seen from the south, above houses. In foreground a field, in which is a woman with milk-pails, and other figures. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. • Copper-Plate Magazine,' Vol. Ill, PI. 123. Date, March 1, 1797. The Drawing is in the possession of the Eev. W. Macgregor. 10. WESTMINSTEE BEIDGE. Engraved by J. Walker. 6| by 4|. Bridge on right; Abbey towers on left, across the river. Sailing barges and wherries in front. ' Copper-Plate Magazine,' Vol. Ill, PI. 133. Date, August 1, 1797. The Drawing, much faded, is in the National Gallery. It was in W. B. Cooke's exhibition in Soho Square, in 1822. Probably Turner bought it back later in life, at Christie's or some other sale, as he often did. The barges in the centre with their tall dark masts and sails, are a singularly effective feature in the composition. 11. FLINT FEOM PAEK-GATE. Engraved by J. Walker. 6£ by 4|. A broad estuary in front. Town and castle in distance on the farther side, below hills rising behind. In foreground, cornfield to left and figures to right. ' Copper-Plate Magazine,' Vol. Ill, PI. 134. Date, August 1, 1797. The Drawing, much faded, was at Christie's in 1877. Mr. W. Ward had formerly the pencil sketch for it, on which Turner, with his usual precision in details, had written notes as to the nature of the foreground. Here was " fallow," and there " wheat." FUnt was treated again in the ' Liber Studiorum,' and also in a beautiful plate of the ' England and Wales ' ; in each case from a different point of view. In the letterpress accompanying the present plate, the artist is described as " the ingenious Mr. Turner "—the only allusion to him in the book. 12. HAMPTON COUET, HEEEPORDSHIEE. Engraved by J. Walker. 6| by 4£. On left, large castellated mansion in park; hills behind. Three anglers by lake in left foreground. 6 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. ' Copper-Plate Magazine,' Vol. Ill, PL 135. Date, Sept. 1, 1797. Another view of the same subject appears in Britton and Bray- ley's ' Beauties of England and Wales,' Vol. VI. 13. CAELISLE. Engraved by J. Walker. 6| by 4|-. City in distance across river; Cathedral high on left. Castle nearer, on extreme right. Bridge in foreground with two men on horseback crossing. ' Copper-Plate Magazine,' Vol. Ill, PL 137. Date, Oct. 2, 1797. In this plate, the Vol. and PL No., usually in the right hand corner, are omitted. I have seen an early impression apparently coloured by hand, in two tints, blue and brown. Probably this was an experiment by Turner. See also Chepstow (PL 2) and Peterborough (PL 8). N.B. — Some early copies pf the ' Copper-Plate Magazine ' have, in place of this plate by Turner, an entirely different view of Car lisle, which is described as " from a Drawing by E. Carlile." 14. WAKEFIELD. Engraved by J. Walker. 6| by 4§-. Eiver in front with town on further side; a conspicuous spire on right. Three men in left foreground, one fishing. ' Copper-Plate Magazine,' Vol. IV, PL 153. Date, June 1, 1798. 15. SHEFFIELD. Engraved by J. Walker. 6| by 4J. Town in distance in centre; a spire and a tower close together. Hills behind. In foreground, man on horseback, and another on foot beside him. 'Copper-Plate Magazine.' Date, August 1, 1798. "Vol. IV, PL 157 " at right upper corner. The Drawing, mueh faded, is in theEuskin Museum at Sheffield. As m the case of Birmingham (PL 6), the contrast with the city of to-day is striking. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 15a. ELGIN CATHEDRAL, MOEATSHIEE. Engraved by J. Walker. d>\ by 4f . Euined west front of Cathedral in centre; remains of choir to left. Two men in foreground on right. ' Copper-Plate Magazine,' Vol. Ill, PL 132. Date, July 1, 1797. On left, " Engraved by J. Walker after an Original Sketch by Jas Moore Esq, F.A.S." The connection of Turner with this plate calls for explanation, as it will be seen from the inscription above that it is attributed to J. Moore. But in the Introduction to ' Turner and Girtin's Picturesque Views Sixty Tears Since,' published in 1854, it is stated (p. xix) : "In the original [sketch] made by Jas. Moore, Esq., F.A.S. [a weU-known antiquary and amateur artist of the time] the windows in the nave were closed, or built up, but in the drawing Turner made, he left them open. On being spoken to about this a few years since he said, ' They ought to have been open ; how much better is it to see the light of day in God's house than darkness ! ' " No doubt in this as in other cases, Turner was employed to touch up and " put in effects " to the sketches of amateurs. Girtin in a similar way adapted Moore's sketch of Glamis Castle for the plate in Vol. IV of the ' Copper-Plate Magazine.' II 'THE POCKET MAGAZINE,' 'THE LADIES' POCKET MAGAZINE,' and 'THE POCKET PRINT MAGAZINE,' 1795-1796 These small plates were probably issued first in monthly parts, and afterwards as pocket volumes, by Harrison and Co., the pub lishers of ' The Itinerant.' As a rule they are very poorly engraved, but some of Eothwell's and Storer's plates, when seen in early im pressions, are passable. None, however, can have done anything like justice to Turner's Drawings, judging from the only surviving example of the latter known to me — that of Bristol (No. 30) now in the Bristol Municipal Art Gallery. This, though minute in size, 8 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. is of the highest artistic quality, a veritable gem of skilful com position and delicate colour. The plates were printed again and again, until they were worn out. They appeared in the three publications named above, and, finally, when mere wrecks, they were re-issued in 'England De lineated,' published by Lackington and Allen, London, in 1804. It is impossible in most cases to distinguish between the various issues, except by the comparative freshness or the worn appearance of each impression. Some of the earliest are printed in a shghtly bluish or greenish ink. The latest of all are in a brown ink and on thin paper; these are quite worthless. 16. THE TO WEE OF LONDON. (Vol. I. Date, January 1, 1795.) Engraved by T. Tagg. 4| by 2|. The Tower in centre, seen from river. Ships with tall masts above and below. As Published. Left, "W. Turner, del"; right, "T. Tagg, Sc." Title in open caps. Above, " Pocket Magazine." Below, " Pub lished by Harrison and C°, Jany 1st, 1795." N.B. — The lettering on the remaining plates of the Series is similar to the above, differing only in the engravers' names, and occasionally in the absence of the magazine Title. 17. CHELSEA HOSPITAL. (Vol. II. Date, March 2, 1795.) Engraved by Storer. 4J by 1\. The Hospital seen from the river. Wherry to left with two pass- ' engers. 18. OXFOED. (Vol. IV. Date, June 1, 1795.) Engraved by T. Tagg. 4| by 2|. City in distance with towers and spires seen from hill. Eoad in foreground; two men in academic costume on right. 19. CAMBEIDGE. (Vol. IV. Date, June 1, 1795.) Engraved by T. Tagg. 4| by 2|. King's College Chapel in centre. In right foreground, students in caps and gowns playing cricket by river. LINE ENGRA VINGS ON COPPER. 20. WINDSOE. (Vol. IV. Date, June 1, 1795.) Engraved by Rothwell. 4| by 2f . The Castle, with houses below, seen from river. Barge in front with tall mast. 21. FLINT. (Vol. V. Date, July 1, 1795.) Engraved by T. Tagg. 4f by 2f . Two ruined towers of castle on the shore in foreground. Fisher men hauling in boat. Sea to left. 22. BATH. (Vol. V. Date, August 1, 1795.) Engraved by G. Murray. 4J by 2\. Bath abbey in centre; houses in front and on hill behind. River in foreground, with sailing-boat, and figures on bank. 23. WOECESTEE. (Vol. not known. Date, August 1, 1795.) Engraved by Rothwell. 4|- by 2-jj-. Cathedral in centre above river, trees and houses to left. Sailing barges on river. 24. WALLINGFOED. (Vol. V. Date, September 1, 1795.) Engraved by T. Tagg. 4| by 2|. Thames in front; old bridge to left, with sailing barge. Church spire in centre rising above houses. 25. TUNBEIDGE. (Vol. not known. Date, September 1, 1795.) Engraved by Murray. 4| by 2\. Eiver in front with bridge to left, over which a coach is passing. Euined castle among trees on eminence to left. Old houses on opposite bank of riven 26. SWANSEA. (Vol. not known. Date, September 1, 1795.) Engraved by Rothwell. 4J by 2 Square keep of castle in centre; harbour and shipping below; hill behind. Ferry-boat with men and horses in front. 10 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. 27. GUILDFOED. (Vol. not known. Date, October 1, 1795.) Engraved by Rothwell. 4£ by 2|. Euined keep of Castle in centre above old houses and trees. Eiver below with sailing boats. Men caulking boat in foreground. 28. NEATH. (Vol. not known. Date, October 1, 1795.) Engraved by G. Murray. 4| by 2f. Town in centre in sunlight, on bank of sharp curve of river; high hills beyond. Men hauling boats ashore in foreground. 29. STAINES. (Vol. IV. Date, November 1, 1795.) Engraved by G. Murray. 4^ by 2|-. The Thames in front with sailing barge on right. In centre, new bridge in construction. Coach crossing old bridge beyond. In the letterpress accompanying this plate occurs the following reference to Turner: " The appearance of this bridge, as now building, with the con trasted old one behind, faithfully delineated in the annexed view, by the ingenious Mr. Turner, has a beautifully picturesque effect." 30. BRISTOL. (Vol. III. Date, January 1, 1796.) Engraved by T. Tagg. 4| by 2f-. City in mid-distance with group of towers relieved against wooded hill behind. A bend of the Avon in foreground. Two figures on bank in front. The beautiful little Drawing for this plate is in the Bristol Museum (see page 7). It is the only one of the Series that I have ever met with. 31. NOETHAMPTON. (Vol. and Date not known.) Engraved by T. Tagg. 4£ by 2J. Market-place, with shops and houses on left; beyond, a church with portico, tower, and cupola. Coach and four standing beside it. N.B. — I have seen an allusion to a further plate of Southampton, but I have never met with an impression. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 11 III HOWLETT'S 'SELECTION OF VIEWS IN THE COUNTY OF LINCOLN,' 1797—1801 This was one of the many illustrated topographical works which were published about the end of the eighteenth century, generally in serial form and by subscription. Frequently, as in the present case, the venture was the engraver's, and he was then usually the publisher. During the progress of the work, somewhere about 1800, Howlett appears to have transferred it to a London publisher, Miller of Bond Street, whose name appears on the completed edition of 1801 and on all subsequent ones. Schnebellie, whose name appears on the plate of Grantham Church, was an architectural draughtsman much employed at that time on works of this character. 32. GRANTHAM CHUECH. Engraved by B. Howlett. 7 by 5 \. Church in centre in graveyard, the tall spire to right. In right foreground, man wheeling barrow, and woman beside him. Engraver's Proof. Before Title and pub. line. Artists' names in etched letters. Beckford Sale, 1817. First Published State (Subscribers' Copies, on large paper). Left, "Drawn by W. Turner, from a sketch by Schnebellie" ; right, "Engraved by B. Howlett," both in italics. Title in centre in italics. Below, "London, published March 1st, 1797, by B. Howlett, Green Walk, Blackfriars Eoad." Later States. The first complete edition was published in 1801, and others followed in 1803, 1805, and probably later. The lettering is always the same, but, after 1803, the plates are very much worn. 33. SLEAFOED CHUECH. Engraved by B. Howlett. 7| by 5. Church in centre, on further side of market-place in which are booths and many people, some seated on ground. 12 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. Engraver's Proof. As preceding plate. Beckford Sale. R. First Published State (Subscribers' Copies, on large paper). Left, " Drawn by W. Turner, A.E. A." ; right, " Engraved by B. Howlett," both in italics. Title in centre in italics. Below, " London. PubUshed by W. Miller, Old Bond S*. 1801." Later States. As in preceding plate. The Drawing was in the possession of the late Mr. Humphry Roberts. There is a pencil sketch for it in the National Gallery. IV ISLE OF WIGHT SERIES (UNFINISHED), 1799 Nothing is known with certainty as to the following four plates, but I believe they formed part of a work which was to have been engraved and published by John Landseer (the father of Sir Edwin) about 1799. The plates were to have been taken mainly from drawings by Ibbotson, but four were contributed by Turner. Owing to a quarrel, the work appears to have been stopped when Landseer had commenced six plates, including the four Turners, and had carried them only as far as the Open Etching. Original impressions of these (distinguished by their being on old paper) are rarely to be met with. Like most of John Landseer's work, they were inferior in execution, and as they bear no painter's or engraver's name, they have probably escaped notice or have been destroyed. After John Landseer's death in 1852, the copperplates of the four subjects by Turner appeared at his sale, and were bought by Bohn the publisher. He had them finished by some inferior en graver, and issued them somewhere between 1853 and 1855, along with two others smaller in size, and different in style from Turner's, in sets of six plates; Turner's name was attached to all the six, but the two added were doubtless from drawings by Ibbotson. The Series is entirely without interest. 34. OECHAED BAT. Engraved by J. Landseer. 10 by 7f . Small rocky bay to left. Three men hauUng boat on shore on right. Other boats and lobster pots on beach. \ LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 13 35. FEESHWATEE BAT. Engraved by J. Landseer. 10 by 7. The bay to left; stakes in shallow water with net ropes attached. Two men with dog in centre foreground. 36. ALUM BAT, ISLE OF WIGHT. Engraved by J. Landseer. 10 by 7-|. High cliffs to left; sea in front; two men with barrow at foot of cliff by a boat; sailing boat beyond. 37. ALUM BAT AND THE NEEDLES. Engraved by J. Landseer. 10 by 7^. Low bank in foreground, sloping to beach on right; cottage below, with woman beside it with child in her arms. Several figures and boats. The Needles conspicuously white in distance. *#* The two smaller plates (7| by 5|) issued by Bohn, of Shanklin Bay and Cowes Castle are, as explained above, doubtless after Ibbotson. V OXFORD UNIVERSITY ALMANACKS, 1799-1811 The history of these has already been given (Introduction, pp. xx, xxi). Eeaders desiring fuller information will find it in an admirable and exhaustive illustrated article by Mr. C. F. Bell in the 'Art Journal ' of August, 1904. The Drawings, which are well preserved, are all in the University Galleries at Oxford. The first two engraved — Christ Church from the Meadows, and The Chapel and Hall of Oriel College — are rather colder in colour than the later ones. These, as Mr. Bell's re searches bear out, were probably all done by Turner at about the same time, the records showing that in 1804 he was paid for seven at once. He received ten guineas apiece for them. Another, 14 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. The Front of Merton College, which was not engraved, is among the Turner drawings in the National Gallery. I have already alluded (Introduction, p. xx) to the action of the Master of Balliol in requiring Turner's design for the Chapel and Hall of that College to be altered to suit what was supposed to be topographical accuracy. A similar liberty was taken with The Interior of the Hall of Christ Church. Mr. Bell has discovered among the archives of the University Press the record that " in 1806 the Board of Delegates felt itself constrained to commission a Mr. O'Neill ' to sketch more correctly some parts of the inside of Christ Church Hall for the use of the Engraver of the Almanack for the coming year.' As the result of his alterations, the pictures on the wall were made recognisable as individual portraits, instead of being treated, as in Turner's Drawing, as patches of broken tone, giving scale to the architecture . . . nor [although Turner was then a full Academician] 'could they be brought to consider his artistic licence as anything but topographical inaccuracy." In the Print Eoom of the British Museum is a Trial Proof in the original condition. I have spoken elsewhere of the fine quality of Basire's engraving in these Almanacks. It can be well seen in the splendid series* of Engraver's Proofs in the Print Eoom of the British Museum. Early and well-preserved impressions are rare. It may be interesting to add that the old form of the Almanack, with its engraved heading and quaint seventeenth-century wording " In the year of our Lord God," is happily still preserved. 38. CHEIST CHUECH FEOM THE MEADOWS. 1799. Engraved by J. Basire. 17f by 12|. Eiver in front; college beyond in centre, partly hidden by trees. Meadows in foreground; man in academic costume handing lady into boat. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Early. Before burin work on sky, water, etc., was completed. Left, " Drawn by William Turner"; right, " Engraved by James Basire "; both in very light italics. Before Title. BM. (6) Eather more advanced. Lettering same. R. As Published. Artists' names in thicker italics. Title in centre, LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 15 " South View of Christ Church, etc., from the Meadows," in shaded italic caps. Later States. Many small differences will be found in the later im pressions of this and the succeeding Almanacks, arising from frequent retouchings and repairs; probably in some cases, a fresh plate may have had to be engraved. I have noted some of the more prominent of these variations, but it is impossible to give details of all. The early or late state of the prints must be judged from their greater or less brilliancy. Some years ago (I believe somewhere about 1865) the whole series of Almanacks from the commencement were reprinted from the original copper-plates, and republished in a large volume. The impressions were inlaid and bore no lettering, but there was a prefatory list of titles, dates, and artists' names. The plates were so worn as to be of little but antiquarian interest. In this plate it will be observed how effectively the white figures in the centre, focus and distribute the lighting. 39. CHAPEL AND HALL OF OEIEL COLLEGE. 1801. Engraved by J. Basire. 17f by 12|. The Chapel and Hall facing spectator; quadrangle in front with academic figures. Greyhound on left. Square tower of Merton College behind. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Very early. Finial of gable on right under tower, left white. B.a.l. BM. (b) Work advanced all through, but before oriel windows in angle on right were darkened. B.a.l. In margin, in pencil, apparently in Turner's writing, is a note to printer: "Sponge Boiler Stone." R. (c) Considerably ad vanced; oriel windows darkened all over; right side of quad lightened. Touched aU over in white by Turner. Before artists' names, but with Title as published. BM. As Published. Left, "Drawn by W™ Turner. A."; right, " En- grav'd by James Basire "; both in dark italics. Title, "A View of the Chapel and Hall of Oriel College, &c," in shaded leaning caps. Later Impressions. Eetouched. Saltires on arms over doorway in angle on right, lightened. The greyhound, which was previously shaded, is now a high light. The engraver here, foUowing Turner's instructions as indicated by his touches of white over the latest Engraver's Proof (c), has 16 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. admirably rendered the reflected light on the college buildings to the right. The satisfactory composition of the buildings, the balance of light and shade, and the fine architectural drawing, make this one of the most attractive of the Almanacks. 40. INSIDE VIEW OF MERTON COLLEGE CHAPEL. 1802. Engraved by J. Basire. 17f by 12f. Interior of Gothic Chapel looking towards East window. Two figures on altar steps; lozenge pavement in foreground. Engraver's Proof. Engraver's work completed, but before any printed Almanack detail below. BM. As Published. Artists' names as in the preceding Almanack. Title, " Inside View of the East End of Merton College Chapel," in shaded leaning caps. The composition and the perspective are here again admirable. The lozenges on the floor carry the eye on to the figures on the steps, the altar, the tall candlesticks behind, and the stained glass window above. 41. WOECESTEE COLLEGE. 1804. Engraved by J. Basire. 17f by 13. College in foreground on left^ wide roadway in front. Tower of Clarendon Press in distance. Men with barrows, etc., and boys playing, in road. The Open Etching. BM. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Early. Sky etc., quite unfinished. Touched by Turner in white and pencil. B.a.l. BM. (b) Sky etc. further advanced. Before men unloading cart defined. Left, " Drawn by Wm Turner E.A." ; right, " Engraved by James Basire," in very light italics. Before Title. BM. (c) Completed, but before alterations to upper story and pediment of window of tower in distance. Lettering as in (6). BM., R. As Published. Left, "Drawn by J. M. W. Turner, E.A."; right, "Engrav'd by James Basire," both in dark italics. Title, "A View of Worcester College &c," in shaded upright caps. Later Impressions. Eetouched. Bright spots of light added on sleeve of man unloading cart, and on face of man against wall. Effect dull throughout and the luminousness lost. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 17 This is perhaps one of the least interesting of the Series, but in the early Proofs, Basire's fine engraving, especially of the sky, gives it extraordinary brilUancy. 42. INSIDE OF BEAZENOSE COLLEGE QUADEANGLE. 1805. Engraved by J. Basire. 17| by 12§. Three sides of a quadrangle; the College entrance in centre. Statue on right on lawn. Dome of Eadcliffe Library behind, and spire of St. Mary's to right. The Open Etching. BM. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Early, before garden roller darkened. B.a.l. BM. (b) Later, roller darkened. Sky still unfinished. B.a.l. BM. As Published. Left, "J. M. W. Turner, E.A., del'"; right, as in pre ceding Almanacks. Title, " A View from the Inside of Brazen Nose College Quadrangle," in shaded caps. Turner's skilful composition is well rendered by the engraver. It will be observed how carefully the light and shade are distributed, and how effectively the half-light of the statue brings out and en hances the brighter central facade. The dome of the Eadcliffe and the spire of St. Mary's again balance one another and give symmetry to the composition. 43. EXETEE COLLEGE FEOM THE TUEL. 1806. Engraved by J. Basire. 17f by 12f. College buildings in light on left of long straight street. Eoad- way undergoing repair. Tall spire of All Saints' Church closes view. As Published. Artists' names as in preceding Almanack. Title, "View of Exeter College, All Saints Church, etc., from the TurL", in shaded caps. Another drawing of this subject by Turner, from almost exactly the same point of view, but probably thirty years later and in the very different style of that period, is in the National Gallery. From its size and general appearance it would appear to have been intended for his ' England and Wales,' but it was never engraved. In it, as in the Almanack, the road is under repair. It is interest ing to observe here, as in the Nottingham of the ' Copper- Plate Magazine,' and many other instances, how Turner's first impression i. c 18 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. of a place seems to have fixed itself indelibly in his mind, and to have been almost invariably repeated by him if he drew the place again, no matter how many years after. Mr. Ruskin has dwelt on the subject in ' Modern Painters,' vol. iv, pt. v, ch. ii, § 19, and in his pamphlet on ' Pre-Eaphaelitism,' §§ 49, 52 (vol. xii of the 1904 Library Edition). 44. INTEEIOE OF HALL OF CHEIST CHUECH. 1807. Engraved by J. Basire. 17j by 13-|-. Interior of wide vaulted Gothic Hall. Portraits round the walls. Servants laying tables on dais at further end. Engraver's Proof. Early. The features of the portraits on walls only generally indicated; the two above dado on left are blank white. B.a.l. BM. As Published. Features of portraits all highly finished. Artists' names as in the three preceding Almanacks. Title, " Inside View of the Hall of Christ Church." in shaded caps. This plate, in spite of the interference of the authorities men tioned above (p. xx) is one of the most beautiful of the Series. The engraver has well rendered Turner's fine drawing of the roof, and his admirable perspective. The lighting by means of rays enter ing from the left, has the characteristic charm of his architectural interiors of this period. 45. OXFOED FEOM HEDDINGTON HILL. 1808. Engraved by J. Basire. 17 J- by 12|. The towers, spires, and domes of the city in distance among trees. On right, in foreground, coach descending hiU. On left, a harrow by the road. The Open Etching. BM. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Early. Sky very unfinished. Lower foliage of tree on extreme right, light. "Oxford" on door of coach. BM. (b) Much more advanced. Light edges to clouds. Foliage on right darkened. " Oxford " still on coach door. Left, "J. M. W. Turner, E.A. del"; right, "Engraved by James Basire," both in light etched italics ; before Title. R. (c) Com pleted, except that distant smoke over city is not defined as white as in Published State. " Oxford " removed from door of coach. Lettering otherwise as in (b). BM. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 19 As Published. Artists' names in thick italics. Title, "View of Oxford from the South Side of Heddington Hill," in shaded caps. Distant smoke over city, clearly defined white. This is an extremely clever piece of engraving. By a judicious use of his Ughts and darks, Basire has — probably by Turner's in structions — considerably improved on the Drawing, the composi tion of which strikes one as somewhat involved. The lines of the many walls are very skilfully used to carry the eye on to the domes and towers in the distance. 46. PAET OF BALLIOL COLLEGE QUADEANGLE. 1809. Engraved by Storer. 17-f by 12|. Lawn in centre; chapel opposite in light. Tower to left with entrance gateway, beside which are two figures in academic cos tume. Basket and gardening tools in foreground. As Published. Left, " Drawn by H. Neill [sic] " ; right, " Engraved by Storer," both in italics. Title in shaded caps. The history of this plate has already been given on p. xx. It will be observed that it is not engraved by Basire, and the execution is very inferior to his. 47. CHEIST CHUECH CATHEDEAL AND PAET OF CORPUS COLLEGE. 1811. Engraved by J. Basire. 17f by 12|. Lawn in foreground with College buildings on right. Cathedral on left among trees. Gardener with barrow in left foreground. The Open Etching. BM. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Early; sky unfinished; sleeve of gardener on left, bench with flower-pots in distance, and tree-trunk on right, all left bright white. B.a.l. BM. (b) Shading added on all the above lights. B.a.l. R. (c) Crockets drawn in ink on angles of leadwork of distant cupola. At back a sketch by Turner in ink for the cupola and crockets, with the following in his handwriting: "Tom is not like. Get Daye's or Rooker's or Delamotte's [other artists who had drawn it in previous Almanacks] to look at. It has Crocketts [sic] at the angles up to the sets [?] of the leadwork." Clouds extensively touched in white for lightening. Rays of light also indicated in white, strik ing diagonally across foliage below Cathedral. B.a.l. R. (d) The 20 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. rays added; finials of pinnacles and windows below cupola con siderably altered, but no crockets added as in the sketch. Clouds lightened. B.a.l. BM. (e) Finished. Finial of window below cupola altered to form seen in Published State. Artists' names as in Published State, but before Title. BM. As Published. Left, "J. M. W. Turner E.A.— P.P. del"'; right, "James Basire, Sculpt."; Title, "View of the Cathedral of Christ Church and Part of Corpus Christi College," all in italics. Turner's note on Engraver's Proof (c) mentioned above, is the first of his written instructions to his engravers which I have met with. There are however earlier examples of Proofs — some in this Series — touched by him for alterations. Va SKELTON'S SMALL REPLICAS OF THE OXFORD ALMANACKS, 1820—1823 Engraved by J. Skelton. About 9 by 7. Skelton, who followed Basire as Engraver to the University, re produced Turner's Almanacks in a small size, as illustrations to his ' Oxonia Antiqua Eestaurata.' The engravings are well executed, but being exact facsimiles, .they do not call for detailed notice. Proofs before any letters are occasionally to be met with, but the ordinary impressions bear Skelton's name both as engraver and publisher. 38a. CHEIST CHURCH FROM THE MEADOWS. 39a. CHAPEL AND HALL OF ORIEL COLLEGE. 40a. INSIDE VIEW OF MERTON COLLEGE CHAPEL. 41a. WORCESTER COLLEGE. 42a. INSIDE OF BEAZENOSE COLLEGE QUADEANGLE. 43a. EXETEE COLLEGE FEOM THE TUEL. 44a. INTEEIOE OF HALL OF CHEIST CHUECH. 45a. OXFOED, FEOM HEADINGTON HILL. 46a. PAET OF BALLIOL COLLEGE QUADEANGLE, 47a. CHEIST CHUECH CATHEDEAL AND PAET OF COEPUS COLLEGE. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 21 VI VIEWS OF DUNSTER CASTLE, SOMERSET SHIRE These two plates of Dunster Castle were the first engravings after Turner which were issued separately and not as book illustra tions. Probably they were the venture of Eawle their engraver and publisher. They are dedicated to Mr. J. Fownes Luttrell, M.P., the then owner of the castle, but Sir H. Maxwell-Lyte has kindly searched the castle records for me and finds no mention of any commission or payment for them. The prints (which are rare) are well engraved, and compared with work previous to 1800, they show a marked advance by Turner in breadth of composition, treat ment of light and shade, and tree drawing. Dunster Castle is one of the most beautiful places in the West of England. The small plate (No. 50) is very similar to No. 48, but is taken from a rather different point of view. It also is engraved by Eawle, but I cannot discover where it appeared. 48. DUNSTEE CASTLE, SOMEESETSHIEE, NOETH-EAST VIEW. Engraved by S. Rawle. 14| by 9f . Castle in distance on wooded hill; gate-house below to right. High hills behind. Park in front with cattle and sheep. Engraver's Proof. One, b.a.l., at Dunster Castle. First Published State (Subscribers' Proofs). On India Paper. Title in Roman caps, shaded. Left, " Drawn by W. Turner A " ; right, " Engraved by S. Eawle." Below, Dedication, coat of arms, and, in centre, "London published May 1 1800 by S. Eawle, No 3 Tottenham- Street. " Second State. Usually on plain paper. The "A" after W. Turner altered to "E.A." in italic caps.1 The Drawings for this and the following plate, both much faded, were in the Hibbert Sale at Christie's, in May, 1886. 1 Turner was made a full R.A. in 1801. 22 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. 49. DUNSTEE CASTLE, SOMEESETSHIEE, SOUTH-WEST VIEW. Engraved by 8. Rawle. 14| by 9|. Castle in sunlight, seen across wide bowling-green. Chaise and four horses at entrance. Gate-house to left. Sea in distance. Published States. As in the preceding plate. I know of no En graver's Proofs. 50. DUNSTEE CASTLE. (The smaU plate.) Engraved by S. Rawle. 6^ by 4. The Castle among woods on hill in centre, seen from park. Houses below to right. In left foreground, gentleman pointing out view to lady. High trees in park on right. I know of one impression only. It bears no date or publication line. Title in Roman caps, shaded. On left, in pencil, " Turner." On right, " Engraved by S. Rawle ", in italics. T. VII 51. WINCHESTER CROSS. 1800. Engraved by J. Powell. 6\ by 8-J. The Cross in centre, surrounded by old houses and shops. Over one of the latter to right, is " Savage, grocer." Many figures on and around steps. The Open Etching. R., T. Engraver's Proof. Unfinished; before Title. Left, "W. Turner del'"; centre, "Publish'd Mar. 8, 1800"; right, "J. Powell, sculp' " ; all in etched italics. R. As Published. Title in centre in italics. Left, "W. Turner, A. delt."; right, "J. Powell sculpt." Underneath, "London, Pub lished July 30, 1800, by Wm Alexander, 42 Newman Street & J. Powell, N° 6 Old Cavendish Street," all in itaUcs. The Drawing was presented by the late Mr. J. E. Taylor to the Whitworth Institute, Manchester. I cannot discover in what work this plate appeared. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 23 VIII WHITAKER'S 'HISTORY OF THE PARISH OF WHALLEY,' 1800-1801 An account of Turner's connection with this work, which was the first of several local or county histories illustrated by him for their author, Dr. Whitaker, vicar of the parish of Whalley on the borders of Torkshire and Lancashire, will be found in the Introduction, pp. xxii, xxiii. Most of the plates, as is shown by their inscriptions, were con tributed by neighbouring landowners at their own expense. Such a practice was common at that period, owners being desirous that their houses and parks should be represented in these county histories. Mr. Hamerton, writing of Turner's work at that period, re marks:1 Turner drew such mediaeval remains in a painstaking and prosaic way at the beginning (Whalley for example), but as he improved in the knowledge and treatment of landscape, he perceived more clearly how much might be done with Gothic architecture as picturesque material, and he drew it better in combination with the surrounding landscape, than any other artist of his time. In this way he came to have a safe little professional speciality. Whenever a publisher wanted a good drawing of an English abbey or castle or cathedral he knew that " young Mr. Turner " would do it for him in a satisfactory way, with all its landscape or street surroundings. 'The Parish of Whalley' has run through many editions (the latest being in 1872), and the lettering of the plates has remained unaltered, although their quality has of course deteriorated with every successive printing. Only the impressions of the first and second (1806) editions are of any value. These remarks apply to all the plates. 52. SEALS OF WHALLET ABBET. (Vol. I, PL 3.) Engraved by J. Basire. 9 by 12. Fourteen seals of various shapes and sizes bearing figures of mitred abbots, etc. Latin inscriptions above and below. 1 Hamerton's 'Life of Turner,' p. 62. 24 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. As Published. Eight lower corner, "J" Basire Sc"; below, in centre, " Published Aug. 11, 1800 by J. Hatchard, Piccadilly." Turner's name does not appear on this print, but his Drawing for it is in the Fitzwilliam Museum at Cambridge. Euskin, in his notes to the Catalogue, draws attention to it as " showing what simple work Turner, who was already an Associate of the Eoyal Academy, was willing to undertake " — and, it may be added, to execute with the utmost care and precision. 53. ANCIENT CEOSSES AT WHALLET. (Vol. I, PL 4.) Engraved by J. Basire. 8 by 1Q\. Three carved stone crosses, two brasses, and three sedilia. As Published. Left, " Drawn by Wm Turner, A. " ; right, "Engraved by J" Basire." Date and Pub. line as in preceding. The Drawing is in the collection of the late Mr. J. E. Taylor. 54. DISTANT VIEW OF WHALLET ABBET. (Vol. I, PL 6.) Engraved by J. Basire. 10J by 7\. The Abbey ruins seen across the river; on the bank, sheep feed ing. Tree stumps on edge of river in foreground. As Published. At top, "Locus Benedictus de Whalley." Artists' names and Pub. Une as in preceding. Below, Dedication to Baroness Howe, with arms. The Drawing was at Christie's in the Harrison sale, 1881. 55. CLOISTERS OF WHALLET ABBET. (Vol. I, PL 7.) Engraved by J. Basire. 10J by 7. Two sides of an open ruined cloister. Boys playing marbles in foreground. Engraver's Proof. One, nearly finished; before Title or Dedica- tion. T. As Published. At top, "Locus Benedictus de Whalley"; below, Dedication to R. H. Beaumont, Esq., F.S.A., with arms. Artists' names and Pub. line as in preceding. The Drawing was at Christie's in the Harrison sale, 1881. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 25 56. WHALLET ABBET (Nearer View). (Vol. I, PL 8.) Engraved by J. Basire. 10 by 7|> The Abbey buildings stretching across centre of plate. Eiver in front with three boys fishing in foreground. Engraver's Proof. Completed. At top, " Locus Benedictus de Whalley." No other lettering. T. As Published. Same inscription at top. Below, Dedication to Lord Curzon. Artists' names and Pub. line as in preceding. The Drawing was at Christie's in the Harrison sale, 1881. 57. CLITHEROE FEOM EADSFOED BEIDGE. (Vol. I, PL 11.) Engraved by J. Basire. 10 by 6^. Bridge to left over which soldiers are passing; trees behind. Town on hill in distance. Engraver's Proof. Completed. Artists' names in faintly etched letters. Dedication to Lord Eibblesdale in open caps. BM. As Published. At top, " Clitheroe from Eadsford Bridge." Below, Dedication in shaded caps. Artists' names and Pub. line as in preceding.I have seen the somewhat faded Drawing in recent years, but I do not know where it now is. 58. BEOWSHOLME. (Vol. I, PL 12.) Engraved by J. Basire. 10-| by 7. An Elizabethan manor-house in the centre among trees. Lawn in front with three men in foreground, one leaning on stick. Engraver's Proof. Touched in white by Turner. Artists' names in italics. Before any other lettering. BM. As Published. At top, " Browsholme." Below, Latin Dedication to Thomas Lister Parker, with arms. Artists' names and Pub. line as in preceding. The Drawing was lent to the Manchester Exhibition of 1857 by Mr. J. Munn. 26 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. 59. TOWNLET HALL. (Vol. II, PL 5.) Engraved by J. Basire. 10 by 6-|. Large mansion in shape of letter E, in level park; castellated towers behind. Trees behind and around; beneath one in left foreground, are two seated figures. Cattle and sheep to right. As Published. At top, " PL V." Below, Latin Dedication to Charles Townley, with arms. Artists' names and Pub. line as in pre ceding. I have no information as to where the Drawing is. 60. STONTHUEST. (Vol. II, PL 13.) Engraved by J. Basire. 10^- by 6-|. A large castellated building on the further side of a sheet of water upon which, in front, are four swans. As Published. At top, " Stonyhurst " in large open caps. Below, Dedication to Thomas Weld, Esq., with arms. Artists' names and Pub.* line as in preceding, but with date May 1, 1801. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. Eeginald Huth. It is interesting to compare Turner's early topographical render ing of Stonyhurst here, with his more striking treatment of the same subject thirty years later in his ' England and Wales.' 61. THE SHEEBURNE CHAPEL IN MITTON CHUECH. (Vol. II, PL 14.) Engraved by J. Basire. 10^ by 6|. The interior of a vaulted Chapel seen behind a wooden screen. Within, two recumbent sepulchral monuments. As Published. Below, Title in italic caps, and Dedication to Thomas Weld, Esq., with arms. Artists' names and Pub. line as in preceding. The Drawing was in Messrs. Agnew's Gallery in 1901. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 27 IX ANGUS'S 'SEATS OF THE NOBILITY AND GENTRY,' 1798—1810 62. FONTHILL HOUSE, WILTSHIRE. (PL 50.) Engraved by W. Angus. 7f by 5-| . Park, with lake in centre, on further side of which, below woods, is classical mansion with two wings connected by arcades. In left foreground under trees, man playing flute and another sitting beside him. As Published. Title in centre, " Fonthill House in Wiltshire, the Seat of William Beckford Esqr." Left, " W. Turner del' A.E. A." ; right, " W. Angus Sculp'." Below, " Published as the Act directs, Mar. Is' 1800, by W. Angus, N° 4 Gwynnes Buildings, Islington." I have no information as to where this Drawing is. Turner was the guest of Beckford at Fonthill in 1799, and made several large drawings of the house and park; these he exhibited at the Eoyal Academy in 1800. X BRITTON AND BRAYLEY'S 'BEAUTIES OF ENGLAND AND WALES,' 1801—1816 63. HAMPTON COUET, HEEEFOEDSHIRE. (Vol. 6.) Engraved by J. Storer. 6 by 4. Park, with lake in foreground, on further side of which is a large castellated mansion with woods rising behind. Cows on right margin of lake; wooden bridge to left. As Published. Title in centre, " Hampton Court, Herefordshire." Left, "Engraved by J. Storer from a Drawing by W. Turner"; right, "For the Beauties of England and Wales." Date, June 1, 1801. This bright little plate is the only engraving after Turner in the book. Another view of the same place appears in the ' Copper-Plate Magazine,' PL 13. A Drawing with this title was in the Miller Sale at Christie's in 1858. 28 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. XI WARTON'S ' ESSAYS ON GOTHIC ARCHITEC TURE,' 2nd Edition, 1802 64. DURHAM CATHEDRAL. Engraved by S. Porter. 4-| by 6£. Interior view from transept obliquely across nave ; Norman pillars, arches and triforium to right, in light. Two figures by pillar in centre, a third on steps to right. As Published. Title at top, " Durham Cathedral " in italics. Below, left, " W. Turner del " ; right, " S. Porter Sculp ". At foot, " Pub lished by J. Taylor, Holborn, London." This plate appears only in the 2nd Edition of the book and is alluded to in the advertisement to that edition as being among the addenda. The Drawing is in the possession of Mrs. Newall. XII BYRNE'S 'BRITANNIA DEPICT A,' 1803—1810 (In some way connected with Lysons' ' Magna Britannia') The illustrations to this topographical work were taken from several counties of England. Turner contributed seven plates, of which five were Berkshire subjects, and two views of Chester. Some of the Drawings show a considerable advance on his earlier work, especiaUy in their greater fulness of colour. The prints, which are all more or less hard in execution, are by W. Byrne, a pupil of Wille and an engraver of good standing, who had been associated with Woollett in reproducing the land scapes of Claude, Wilson, and others. He appears to have had a pecuniary interest in the publication, apart from what he was paid for engraving, as was often the case with the engravers of that LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 29 period. Like many other artists of his school — Woollett included — he is seen to greater advantage in his large plates as compared with small ones such as these. 65. WICKHAM,1 FROM THE MAELOW EOAD. Engraved by W. Byrne. 8^ by 6. The Town in mid-distance seen through overarching trees ; church conspicuous in centre. Hills behind. House with scaffolding on right. Cows on road in foreground. As Published. Title in centre in italics. Left, " Drawn bv W. Turner E.A"; right, " Engraved by Wm Byrne, F.S.A." At foot, " Lon don, Published Is' July, 1803, by W. Byrne, Tichfield Street and T. Cadell Junr and W. Davies, Strand." The earliest impressions are on India paper. The Drawing is in my possession. The engraving is hard and mechanical, and altogether fails to do justice to it. 66. ETON, FEOM THE SLOUGH EOAD. Engraved by W. Byrne. 8^ by 6. A road passes over bridge in foreground, with trees to left. Eton College Chapel beyond. Three men by left parapet of bridge, and two by stream below it to right. Engraver's Proof. Completed. B.a.l. M. As Published. Lettering as in preceding plate. This Drawing, with the one preceding and the three next fol lowing, were sold — I believe at Foster's — a few years ago. Some of them were much faded. 67. ABINGDON FEOM THE THAMES NAVIGATION. Engraved by W. Byrne. 8£ by 6. A lock in foreground with boat coming out. Town in distance across river, with tall spire conspicuous on left, and building with cupola in centre. 1 A note in the text gives the corrected title as " High Wycombe." 30 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. Lettering as in the two preceding plates, except that Date is 1st Jany 1805. For Drawing, see preceding plate. 68. NEWBUET, FEOM SPEEN HILL. Engraved by W. Byrne. 8f by 6. Town in mid-distance in valley, seen from a hill. In left fore ground, man with folded arms standing by woman seated on ground. Lettering and Drawing as in preceding plate. 69. DONNINGTON CASTLE. Engraved by W. and L. Byrne. 8| by 6. Castle on hill in centre among trees. Below, figures seated under trees beside river. Cows and milk-pails in foreground. Lettering as in preceding plate, but with " W. and L. Byrne " in place of " W. Byrne." Title, " Donnington Castle, taken from a Field adjoining the Eoad to East Ilsley from Newbury." The Drawing is in the possession of the Eev. T. Case. 70. DISTANT VIEW OF CHESTEE. Engraved by W. Byrne. 8| by 6. City in extreme distance, seen from an eminence in foreground, across a wide extent of level meadows. In front, three cows in deep shadow below trees. The Open Etching. R. Engraver's Proof. Completed. B.a.l. R. As Published. Lettering as in preceding plates, except that Date is Jan. 24, 1810. v The Drawing was at Hogarth's Gallery some years ago. Turner's composition here is admirable, and the effect of distance over a flat country well rendered, but Byrne's engraving is, as always, somewhat heavy in execution. LINE ENGRA VINGS ON COPPER. 31 71. PAET OF CHESTEE CASTLE. Engraved by W. Byrne. 8f by 6. Eiver in front below Castle, which rises behind to right, above old houses. Shipping and barges to left. The Open Etching. R. As Published. Lettering as in preceding plate. I have no information as to the Drawing. XIII 'SELECT VIEWS OF LONDON AND ITS ENVIRONS,' 1804—1805 72. WINDSOE FROM THE FOREST, BERKS. Engraved by J. Greig. 5f by 7f. Castle in mid-distance caught by ray of sunlight which also falls on reach of Thames to left. Windsor park in foreground; man bareheaded sitting under tree. The Open Etching. Sotheby's, 1906. Engraver's Proof. Before any letters. R. Sotheby's, 1906. First Published State. Title in centre in italics. Above it, " En- grav'd by J. Greig from a drawing by Wm Turner, R.A " ; below, " London, Published Jan. 2, 1804, by Vernor and Hood, Poultry. J. Storer and J. Greig, Chapel Street, Pentonville " ; all in italics. Later State. Same lettering, except that title is in Roman caps. Much worn. Later Reprint (Book unknown). Four parallel lines added all round plate. Publishers' name altered to "J. & J. Conder, Albion Press, London, 1814." So worn as to be hardly recognizable. The Drawing, much faded, was sold a few years ago by Mr. W. Ward. In early impressions this is a charming little print, the lighting and composition admirable, and the engraving brilliant. 32 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. XIV MAWMAN'S 'EXCURSION TO THE HIGH LANDS OF SCOTLAND AND THE ENGLISH LAKES,' 1805 An unimportant work containing three small plates after Turner, the only interest of which lies in their being the first engraved records of any visit by him to Scotland. The engraver, J. Heath, was the father of Charles Heath, who was associated with so many of Turner's later plates. 73. INVERART. Engraved by J. Heath. 6 by 4^. Town and Castle on further shore of Loch Fyne; mountains rising behind. In left foreground, men in kilts unloading fish from boat. First Published State. Title in open Roman caps. Left, " Drawn by J. M. W. Turner E.A."; right, "Engraved by J. Heath." At foot, "London, Published May 1, 1805, by J. Mawman, Poultry." Later States. Letters of title shaded. In the ' Dictionary of National Biography,' Article " John Pye," it is stated that the latter was the engraver of this plate. As he was at that time Heath's pupil, this may very possibly have been the case. This charming Drawing was in the Stern sale at Christie's in 1908. 74. LOCH LOMOND. Engraved by J. Heath. 6 by As\. Loch in centre between mountains. Group of Highlanders seated on road in foreground. Flock of sheep on bank to right. Lettering and States as in preceding plate. I have no information as to where the Drawings for this and the foUowing plate are. 75. PATTEEDALE. Engraved by J. Heath. 6 by 4|. In foreground a road passing a church. Ullswater and mountains beyond. To left, woman with pitcher crossing stepping-stones. Lettering and States as in two preceding plates. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 33 XV BRITTON'S 'FINE ARTS OF THE ENGLISH SCHOOL,' 1811—1812 76. POPE'S VILLA. Engraved by J. Pye and J. Heath. 9 by 6|-. In centre, a reach of the Thames, on the further side of which, below trees, is the Villa in course of demolition. In foreground, labourers to left, and shepherd and shepherdess with sheep. Punt to right, with two men. The Open Etching. Sky not commenced. In centre, in etched writing, " John Pye. 1810." BM. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Early. Foreground advanced. Sky only begun. Same lettering as in preceding. BM. (V) Completed throughout. Same lettering. BM., R. (c) Left, " Painted by J. M. W. Turner E.A"; right, " Eng. by John Pye. 1810"; both in italics. Before Title, Dedication, etc. First Published State. Title in centre, in open caps. Left, "Class 1, Painting"; right, "for ' the Fine Arts of the English School.' " Below, " Engraved by John Pye, the figures by Chas Heath, from a Picture by J. M. W. Turner Esq. R.A. and P.P. in the Gallery of Sir John Fleming Bar'." Dedication, etc. Pub. April 1, 1811, by Longmans. Under " Class I," etc., on left, is the word " Proof " faintly engraved. Later States. The word " Proof" removed. The oil picture is in the possession of Mr. Charles Morrison. The important place of this small but charming plate, in the history of Turner's, and of English landscape engraving in general, has already been pointed out (Introduction, pp. xxv, xxvi). The scene depicted — which had doubtless been witnessed by Turner, who had a house near — is the dismantling of Pope's villa at Twickenham before its demolition in 1807 by Baroness Howe, who built a new house in its place. Apart from the technical interest of the plate, the subject is full of poetical feeling. The classical shepherd and shepherdess are graceful figures, carefully drawn, and their value to the composition is great. The white villa and its reflection finely focus and distribute the lighting, whilst there is everywhere a calm serenity, and the feeling of a fine English summer's day. 34 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. Britton, the enterprising publisher who had commissioned the engraving, appears to have proposed to print some remarks of his own along with it, and to have sent these to Turner for his ap proval.1 They have not been preserved, but Turner's reply, given below, although even more unintelligible than usual with him, is interesting. Britton had apparently been championing poetical landscape—" Elevated Landscape," Turner calls it — against critics who required strict topographical accuracy; or, to use the painter's expressive term, " Map-making criticism." "Sir " I rather lament that the remark which you read to me when I called in Tavistock Place is suppressed, for it espoused the part of Elevated Landscape against the aspersions . . . map mak[ing] criticism; but no doubt you are better acquainted with the nature of p . . . tion, and mine is a mistaken zeal. As to remark, you will find a . . . alteration of colour in pencil. Two groups of sheep. Two fishermen occur too close; basket to en trap eels is not technical, being called eel pots ; and making the willow tree, the identical Pope's willow [sic] is rather strained (?) Cannot you do it by allusion, and with deference)?) [The foregoing was evidently Turner's critic ism on Britton's proposed remarks. The rest of the letter is unintelligible in the absence of those remarks.] ******** " Your most truly obed. "J. M. W. Turner. " XVI WHITAKER'S 'HISTORY OF CRAVEN,' 2nd Edition, 1812 77. SOUTH TRANSEPT OF FOUNTAINS ABBET, TORK- SHIRE. Engraved by J. Basire. 10 by 7-J-. Abbey ruins in foreground, on bank of stream which flows under arches of buildings towards spectator. Dark evening effect, with sun setting behind ruins. In angle to right, in deep shadow, two men, one with fishing-rod. Engraver's Proof. Completed. B.a.l. R. As Published (in Second and Later Editions of the work only). Title in italics ("Transept," spelt " Transcept "). Left, " J. M. W. Turner, E.A, P.P. del."; right, "James Basire Sculp." At top of plate, on right, " PL I." 1 Thornbury, ' Life of Turner,' 2nd cd., p. 333. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 35 The earliest impressions are on large folio paper. Many succeed ing editions of the book (some comparatively recent) are in quarto form. In most of these the plate is extremely worn. The large and beautiful Drawing of this subject was exhibited by Turner at the R.A. in 1798. It appeared at a Sale in London a few years ago, covered with a coat of varnish, which had given it a curious granulated look, somewhat resembling the texture of aquatint. Probably it was varnished by Turner himself, just as Gainsborough varnished some of his drawings. An important Drawing of Cader Idris, of about the same date, was similarly treated. Both these, I believe, are now in America. Still another, a large distant view of Lichfield Cathedral, also of the same period, is in my possession. The engraved plate is beautiful and poetical. Basire's execution is fine, although perhaps, as usual, a little heavy. XVII 'BRITISH GALLERY OF PICTURES '—STAF FORD GALLERY, 1808?— 1818 78. A FISHING SMACK WITH A BOAT. Engraved by J. Fittler. 7| by 5. Three fishing smacks close together, in front, On tossing sea. Three ships of war at anchor on horizon to right. Heavy storm- clouds to left. Engraver's Proofs. B.a.l. T., R. As Published. At top, close to plate line, Title in slender caps, with " 7 " below; above it, " Marquis of Stafford's Collection" ; left, "Class the Sixth"; right, "Schools of Great Britain." Below, left, "J. M. W. Turner R.A."; right, " 7.0| by 5.0"; centre, " Drawn by W. M. Craig. Engraved by J. Fittler, A.RA, Engraver to his Majesty." At foot, " Published July 1, 1812 by Longman," and others. I have an impression of this print very skilfully coloured by hand, and I have seen another similar. I think it probable that both were coloured by Turner himself, as was the case with the large mezzotint of The Shipwreck, engraved a few years earlier. The plate is taken from the well-known picture in the Stafford (now Bridgewater) Gallery, which was painted by Turner in rivalry 36 ENGRA VED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. with the fine Vandevelde which hangs near it. He is reported to have said that it was this picture which made him a painter of the sea. Burnet1 has an interesting comparison of the two works. The two small Mezzotints of this subject will be described later. XVIII 79. HIGH STREET, OXFOED. 1812. Engraved by S. Middiman, J. Pye, and C. Heath. 23f by 16. Looking up the High Street towards Carfax. University College on left. Spire of St. Mary's conspicuous on right. Many figures in foreground, some in academic costume. The Open Etching (by Middiman). Before any work in sky. Title in old English letters, open. Dedication, with Arms; all caps open. In centre, close under plate line, in italics, "Pub lished March 14 1811 by James Wyatt, Carver and gilder, High Street Oxford." Before engravers' names. Extremely fine. M., R. Engravers' Proofs, (a) Sky commenced and work generally carried forward with burin. Lettering as in the preceding. In various stages. M., R. (b) Work completed throughout. Date of Pub lication altered to Mar. 14, 1812. " Engraved by John Pye, 1812," added, in etched writing, on right. M., R. First Published State (Subscribers' Proofs). Pye's name on right removed, and in its place substituted " the Figures engraved by C. Heath." Third line of Dedication altered to "This Plate engraved by S. Middiman and John Pye after an original Picture," etc. " As the Act Directs " added just above the Arms. Second State (Prints). All the Title, and all the caps in Dedication, shaded. Impressions of this State are good. A few impressions were printed (or possibly coloured by hand) in two colours — blue and brown. The oil picture is in the possession of Lady Wantage. The history of this plate, the first and one of the best of the large engravings after Turner, has already been given (Introduction, pp. xxvi to xxviii). The correspondence concerning it and its companion, 1 ' Turner and his Works,' 1852, p. 76. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 37 Oxford from the Abingdon Road, between the painter and Wyatt who commissioned them both, has been preserved, and is printed — in hopeless confusion as to subject and sequence, and mixed with letters referring to other engravings — in Thornbury's ' Life ' (2nd ed., pp. 163-175). One of the letters has already been quoted (Introduction, p. xxviii), and the whole series is extremely interest ing, as showing the extraordinary care which Turner gave to every detail of the picture and the print. Not only does he discuss with Wyatt the scheme of composition, the arrangement of the buildings, and even the correctness of the dress of the academical figures, but he goes into the questions of the prospectus, the time at which it should be issued, the form in which subscriptions should be solicited, the cost of printing the impressions, the number of proofs to be taken, the necessity that each should be numbered, and many other matters, all in the most practical and business-like spirit. If genius is rightly defined as being " the power of taking infinite pains," Turner may certainly be cited as an example. The picture itself was painted from a post-chaise anchored in the High Street, just below the entrance of Queen's College. Turner stayed with Wyatt while he was painting it, and the latter's succes sor, the late Mr. Eyman, told me that he understood that Turner was immensely interested in the fine line engravings by Italian masters in Wyatt's stock, especially with Eaphael Morghen's re production of Guido' s Aurora. He was paid eighty guineas for the oil picture of the High Street, Oxford, and I believe, the same sum for its companion, Oxford from the Abingdon Road. The plate, which was the joint work of three engravers, Middiman, Pye, and Heath, occupied two years in execution, and was completed in 1812. The Open Etching — an exceptionally fine work — was by Middiman, and it is to his masterly handling that much of the fine quality of the plate is due. The subsequent burin work, including the whole of the sky, was executed by Pye, the figures alone being added by Heath* Such co-operation was then not unfrequent, especially on large prints. The plate is admirable in composition, and its whole effect simple, spacious, and restful. The arrangement of light and shade is very telling; the few figures are carefully drawn and well placed; the black gowns of the dignitaries are especially effective. The distant spire of Carfax repeats the nearer and higher spire of St. Mary's, and focusses the converging lines of the buildings and roadway. It will be observed also how well Pye has preserved the luminous ness — due to reflected light — of the buildings in shadow on the left, and how that shadow is enforced by its contrast with the white dresses of the women in the street. 38 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. 79a. THE SMALL EEPLICA OF 'HIGH STEEET, OXFORD.* Engraved by W. E. Albutt. 11£ by 7£. Eeduced copy in facsimile of the preceding plate. Inscription. Title in both French and English. Left, "Peint par J. M. W. Turner E.A." Eight, " Gravee par W. E. Albutt." Below, " Paris, chez le proprietaire, Boulevard du Mont Parnesse, 1828." I have never seen any other example than the one in my posses sion, and I cannot ascertain for what purpose it was engraved. XIX 80. A VIEW OF OXFOED FEOM THE ABINGDON EOAD. 1818. (Companion to High Street, Oxford.) Engraved by John Pye and C. Heath. 23£ by 15f. City in distance in centre seen from a hill; level country between. Flock of sheep approaching up the hill. In foreground, fallen mile stone on which is " Oxford." The Open Etching. Before any work in sky. Left, "Painted by J. M. W. Turner, E.A. P.P."; right, "Etch'd by John Pye, the Figures by Cha's Heath " ; all in italics. Arms and Pub. line, but before Title or Dedication. BM., R. Engraver's Proof. Burin work well advanced all over. Sky begun. Lettering as in preceding. BM. First Published State. (Subscribers' Proofs.) Title in old English letters, open. Dedication to Lord Eldon; Arms of University. Below, "This Plate Engraved by John Pye, after an original Picture, by J. M. W. Turner E.A & Professor of Perspective to Eoyal Academy, is dedicated with Permission, by his Lordship's most obliged and very humble Servant James Wyatt." Under plate line in centre, " Published Feb 13, 1818, by James Wyatt, carver and gilder, High Street, Oxford, As the act directs." Second State (Prints). Letters of Title and all caps in Dedication shaded. The work considerably enforced throughout. The dark cow in foreground is noticeably much darker than in the First State.The oil picture was in the collection of the late Sir John Fowler. The success of the High Street, Oxford, immediately on its appear- LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 39 ance, led Wyatt at once to commission from Turner this, the com panion subject. The second picture must have been rapidly painted, as both it and the High Street were exhibited together in the Eoyal Academy of 1812. The engraving of Oxford from the Abingdon Road, was entrusted solely .to Pye, with the exception of the figures, which were again Heath's work. It was not a success. The tech nique is unsatisfactory and the print has a weak, 'woolly' look throughout. Pye was a fine engraver, and, as has been already pointed out,1 the art of landscape engraving in England owes much to him. But as an etcher he had not the strength or the draughts manship of Middiman, and it is mainly to the weakness of the Preliminary Etching that the failure of this plate is due; just as it was to Middiman's strong foundation that the High Street, Oxford, owed much of its success. The failure was unfortunate, as the pic ture itself is extremely beautiful in design. The following very incoherent letter2 from Turner to Wyatt during the progress of the plate, whilst amusingly showing their cordial relations, also displays Turner's readiness to meet the wishes of his patrons as far as he could; it also demonstrates how his sense of composition dominated everything. "Saturday, November 6, 1812. "Sir "First let me thank you for the sausages and hare. They were very good indeed. ***** But respecting the venerable oak or elm you rather puzzle me. If you wish either, say so, and it shall he done ; but fancy to yourself how a large tree would destroy the character — that burst of flat country with uninterrupted horizontal lines throughout the picture as seen from the spot we took it from. The hedgerow oaks are all pollards, but can be enclosed if you wish. As to figures, I have not determined upon them, but if you have a predilection for any, or object, it is the same to me ; or if, as I suppose, the [subscribers?] have carved some out for me in order at least; so their opinions may be taken, reserving to myself the use or adapta tion of them as most fit or conducive to my subject as to colour, &c. * * * * " Your most obedient servant, " Mr. J. Wyatt. "J. M. Turner." XX 'THE LADY AND GENTLEMAN'S ANNUAL POCKET LEDGER,' 1814 81. EEDCLIFFE CHURCH, BRISTOL. Engraved by John Pye. 5 by 3 Eiver Avon in foreground; across further bank, in centre, is 1 Introduction, p. xxvi. * Thornbury, 2nd. ed., p. 169. 40 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. the Church (without spire, as it then was), and houses. Boats with masts, aground on each side, and shipping in distance to left. Title in centre in open Eoman caps, " View of Redcliffe Church etc. Bristol." On left, in pencil, "J. M. W. Turner del"; right, "John Pye, Sept." On the opposite side of the sheet is a proof of the Title-page as follows : above, " The Lady's and Gentleman's Annual Pocket Ledger with Various Articles of Useful Information." In centre, enclosed in wreath, " 1814." Below, " London published by W. See opposite page. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 91 quently this very inferior edition can only be distinguished from the original issue by its inferiority. Reprint A. In 1843 the Turner plates were reworked throughout, reprinted with the original descriptions, and published in a thin folio volume by Nichols and Son, London.1 The lettering is the same as in the original issue, except that where the printers' name had previously appeared, it has usually been removed. The impressions are hard, scratchy, and altogether wanting in lumin ousness. They are constantly to be met with. Reprint B. In the ¦ Art Journal ' of various dates, and again in the 1874 edition of ' The Turner Gallery.' Titles in open Rom. caps, artists' names in slender Rom. caps. Below, " London, Virtue and Co, Limited." Reprint C. In 1891 the plates were once more reworked (a labour of love) by J. C. Armytage, one of Turner's old engravers, under the direction of Mr. Marcus Huish, and were published by Virtue and Co., with an introduction by Mr. Huish and notes on each plate by Mrs. Alfred Hunt. These impressions are without any lettering, printed on India paper, and mounted on modern plate- paper. They are much superior to the previous Reprints, the re touching having been done with great skill and taste. The Drawing formerly belonged to Mr. Ruskin. 170. RICHMOND CASTLE AND TOWN. (Vol. I, p. 94.) Engraved by J. Archer. 11 by 7\. • The ruined Castle on steep hill to right; town beyond and below. Conspicuous white smoke from chimney below castle. Bridge to left, crossing river. Stormy sky. Woman carrying linen on her head in foreground. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Right, " J. Archer Sc " in very small etched writing. Drawn on and scraped all over by Turner. T. (b) Same lettering. The alterations indicated in (a) carried out, but in a curiously unintelligent manner; every light indicated by the scraping of Turner's knife being mechanically copied. BM., R., T, Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Title in italics. Artists' names in small Rom. type. Pub. line Date, June 6, 1820. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. 1 It was this edition which was described on the title-page as " Views in Richmondshire after Drawings by J. M. W. Turner, R.A., with Descrip tions by the Rev. Dr. Whitaker. See Introduction, p. xxiii. 92 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. See Note *#*, and remarks on Reprints A, B, C, in Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169, all of which hold good of the Series. The Drawing belonged at one time to Mr. Ruskin. 171. ST. AGATHA'S ABBEY, EASBY. (Vol. I, p. 112.) Engraved by J. Le Keux. Ill % & Wide, still reach of river in foreground, flowing from left under wooded hills. The Abbey ruins on right bank. Man watering horses in centre; milkmaids by stile to right. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Left, "Drawn by J. M. W. Turner R.A."; right, " Etch'd by J. Le Keux " ; in centre, " Easby " ; all in faint etched italics. Before the woman milking. Only one line of white ripple in the wake of the moorhen in centre. BM., R., Th. (b) Same lettering, except that "Etch'd by" is altered to "En graved by." Woman added, milking cow in angle of Abbey ruins. Two lines of white ripples in wake of moorhen. BM., R., Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, Feb. 14, 1822. " Printed by MeQueen and C° " low on right. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing is in the possession of Mrs. Sale. Mrs. Alfred Hunt in her Notes to the Reprinted Edition of 1891 remarks : "Easby Abbey in real life, is rather a disappointing ruin, but not so in Turner's drawing, or if seen under the conditions in which he painted it. ' It is a singular fact,' remarks Mr. Longstaffe in an excellent little book on Richmondshire, ' that in these ruins scarcely a room [sic] has right angles, and that the whole place is reeling and out of course.' We have only to look at the engraving to see the truth of this remark. The mass of building to the left is distinctly out of the perpendicular. Turner, of course, was quick to see this, and has not only given the fact in the drawing of the building itself, but has emphasized the irregularity by putting the water-hen's wing in an upright position exactly in the line where the reflection would have come had the walls been straight." 172. ASKE HALL. (Vol. I, p. 115.) Engraved by J. Scott. 11 by 7-J. Large mansion in mid- distance in park, below wooded hills. View taken from road in foreground below overarching trees. Flock of sheep approaching from right; man on white horse to left. LINE ENGRA VINGS ON COPPER. 93 Engraver1 s Proofs, (a) Without any letters. Before any sheep on park before house. BM., Th. (b) In centre, under plate-line, "J. M. W. Turner R.A. del1— J. Scott, sculp1" in small etched italics. Sheep added, scattered about park. BM., R., T., Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, Aug. 28, 1821. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing was recently in the possession of Messrs. Gooden and Fox. " There is one ash tree in particular, growing by the wayside, which is the very making of Turner's drawing, and it is just possible that when the com mittee of gentlemen who were deputed to pick out Turner's point of view for him — for he was not considered competent to do that for himself — chose such an unpromising subject as Aske Hall, that this ash tree and its compeers by the wayside made him able to do it with complete artistic pleasure. . . . The trees, the bend of the road, and its short ascent which have been so well used by Turner for the foreground and encompassing framework of the design, have suffered little change or interference since his time. . . . But it is the only one of the set, except the ' Kirkby Lonsdale,' in which we have a complete framework of tree-trunks and overarching boughs — a com monplace of landscape composition — classical, beautiful, and for ever tempt ing, but most difficult to manage well. The look of formal composition can hardly ever be avoided. Problems of foreshortening lurk in wayward boughs, the distinctiveness as well as the multitude of leaf clusters, or even of leaves, must be given, and whether from long conventional misuse, or a haunting air of prettiness, it is a form of arrangement, which artists are now, at all events, slow to use. In this case Turner has triumphed with it, and Ruskin declares the Aske Hall to be one of the most characteristic of the Yorkshire drawings as regards truths of vegetation. We may note how the overarching of the boughs is broken, especially by one which appears to swoop downward nearly half-way between the two sets of tree-trunks, so as almost to touch tlie chief line of the hills which enclose the valley. This bough is a notable one in itself. The foreshortening, as shown by loss or gain of breadth accord ing as it approaches or recedes, is a piece of truth not often met with in the bough-drawing of most artists. "The sheep, all except one on the extreme right, are admirable. How plainly they enjoy their rest, panting even in the shade ! We may note the skill with which another represented as cropping the herbage at the side of the road is linked in composition with the curve of the little bridge at the bottom of it, and how the two curved things are somehow provided with something which is somehow related to them in the horse bending^ its neck to the ground on the other side. There are relations of this sort all over the design, unsought for and unlaboured by the artist, to whom they were the natural way of telling his story when once he had seized on it as a pictorial whole. Every touch, or group of touches, with or without his conscious choice, serves its purpose as well for the likeness of the fact, as for the expression of his feeling with respect to it, for there is everywhere a link or a contrast — everywhere something which his artistic feeling has dictated to soften, accentuate, or ennoble." — Notes by Mrs. Alfred Hunt. 94 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. 173. HIGH FORCE OR FALL OF TEES. (Vol. I, p. 142.) Engraved by J. Landseer, F.S.A. lOf by 7i. High perpendicular rocks on either side. Between them a rounded bastion divides the fall into two portions. Rainbow in centre below. Angler wading below fall and man with landing net. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Without any letters. Before the darker lines in the rainbow. BM., T. (b) Left, " W. M. J. Turer [sic] E.A. Del"'; right, "J. Landseer F.S.A. Sculp"; centre, "Fall of the Tees, 1821 "; all in etched italics. Eainbow divided into bands by two darker lines. BM., R., Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, Sept. 12th, 1822. "Printed by H. Triggs " low on right. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. A. J. Forbes Leith. The Drawing of High Force of Tees is, I believe, altogether finer than the engraving. The latter is inferior in execution and poor in general effect. Mrs. Alfred Hunt says : " Turner is said to have been so delighted with ' High Force,' that on one occasion he all but lost his life there. He stayed so long sketching one evening that he was overtaken by darkness, and when climbing the steep hill, was quite unable to see his way, and soon lost it altogether. After long and fruitless attempts to find it, he became so weary that he sat down in despair and would never have got home at all if an old shepherd had not chanced to pass by and find him." 174. EGGLESTONE ABBEY, NEAE BAENAED CASTLE. (Vol. I, p. 152.) Engraved by T. Higham. 10f by 7\. The Abbey ruins on hill in centre; farmhouse adjoining; river below flowing from right through trees. Water-mill to left, beside which a man is fishing and a woman spreading linen. Engraver's Proofs. Left, " Drawn by J. M. W. Turner E.A"; right, "Engd by T. Higham," in very faint italics. BM., R., T., Th. (The two parallel lines round the margin are present in all States.) First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, Decr, 1822. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 95 Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing was in Mr. Euskin's collection. It is a good deal faded. The charming, spring-like effect of this engraving has always attracted me. Mrs. Alfred Hunt remarks of the Egglestone Abbey of to-day: " What we see now in passing along the high road on the Durham side of the Tees, from Barnard Castle towards Rokeby, at a point which offers the nearest approach to his chief point of view, is a beautiful piece of Tees-side scenery, but Eggleston Abbey contributes to that beauty little more than a name and a memory, so hardly has time (let us say) dealt with it. . . . The two graceful arches to the left of the farmhouse are gone. On the other side of the drawing, nothing remains unchanged except the field- road, which he has given with fine feeling for the beauty of its curves as it winds away into the glades of the wood. . . . The trees must have grown enormously since Turner was there. The view from the Abbey bridge is a magnificent piece of river scenery, the trees being so lofty on both sides and the river running, as it were, in a deep chasm, over and among its clear white slabs of limestone; but the Abbey is scarcely to be seen from the bridge, except by a peep through the leaves when the wind blows them aside." 175. JUNCTION OF THE GEETA AND TEES AT EOKEBY. (Vol. I, p. 184.) Engraved by J. Pye. 10| by 7\. A long, still reach of river on right, between wooded banks; in foreground it is joined by a smaller, more rapid stream, descending among rocks and trees from the left. In centre mid-distance, a house partly seen through trees. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Without any letters : the stream flowing from left, unfinished. T. Another, touched and scraped by Turner. BM. (b) Still b.a.l. Plate finished. BM., R., T., Th. (c) In centre, under plate-line: " Engrav'd by John Pye, 1819." Before Title, but traces of an imperfectly erased inscription visible in centre. R., Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170, with " Etched by S. Middiman and J. Pye," in addition, in centre under plate-line. Pub. line Date, Aug. 2, 1819. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing is in the possession of Mrs. Fordham. 96 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. " The junction of the Greta and Tees, which was chosen for Turner as his subject, is the most striking of the many beautiful points of view in Rokeby Park. Let us stand where Turner stood when he painted it — by the many- chanelled Greta, on the Mortham side. The larger stream of the Tees flows directly towards us, with thick woods and ledges of pale-grey limestone on either side, until it turns aside as if it were pushed out of its course by the impetuous little Greta and the layers of rock which form its channel. These layers are, it must be owned, very geometrical indeed, and it would try the resources of the greatest composer to give their true character consistently with pleasantness of pictorial effect. . . . Turner has almost ignored this level floor with its exact divisions ; he has preferred to dwell on the debris which is strewn about the river bed ; but he has given us the victory of Greta over the larger stream, the texture of the sandstone blocks, the plumy toss and fulness of the smaller trees, and, above all, the solemn rigid respectability of the three large elms which guard the house. These trees have grown considerably since Turner's time, and now do lovers of nature the good service of completely shutting out all view of the Hall." — Mrs. Alfred Hunt's Notes. 176. BEIGNALL CHUECH. (Vol. I, p. 194.) Engraved by S. Rawle. lOf by 7\. A ravine in centre between wooded, interlocking hills, through which a river flows. Church in meadow to right. Boy climbing tree in foreground to reach kite. View taken from above. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Very early. Lef t, " J. M. W. Turner, del " ; right, "Etchd by S. Eawle"; in centre, " Brignall Ch""; all in very faint etched italics. Drawn on by Turner in pencil. T. (b) Completed. Same lettering. BM., R., T. (c) "Etchd by S. Eawle," altered to "S. Eawle fc." and "York" added after " Chh." BM. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 169. Pub. line Date, Oct. 25, 1822. " Printed by McQueen and C° " low on right. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing was destroyed by fire many years ago while in the possession of Griffiths, Turner's agent. Brignall Church has always seemed to me the most beautiful and poetical of all the plates of the 'Eichmondshire.' Mr. Euskin writes of it : " I shall never cease to regret the destruction, by fire, now several years ago, of a drawing which always seemed to me to be the perfect image of the painter's mind at this period— the drawing of Brignall Church near Rokeby, of which a feeble idea may still be gathered from the engraving (in the LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 97 Yorkshire series). The spectator stands on the ' Brignall Banks,' ' looking down into the glen at twilight ; the sky is still full of soft rays, though the sun is gone, and the Greta glances brightly in the valley, singing its even song; two white clouds, following each other, move without wind through the nollows of the ravine, and others lie couched on the far-away moorland ; every leaf of the woods is still in the delicate air; a boy's kite, incapable of rising, has become entangled in their branches, he is climbing to recover it ; and just behind it in the picture, almost indicated by it, the lowly church is seen in its secluded field between the rocks and the stream ; and around it the low churchyard wall, and a few white stones which mark the resting- places of those who can climb the rocks no more, nor hear the river sing as it passes." — Pre-Raphaelitism, 1904 ed., vol. xii, p. 371. Mrs. Alfred Hunt says: "You splash through the pebbly shallows at the outlet of the pool in the river, or clamber over the ruinous heap fallen from the cliff, and perhaps a path suc ceeds, and a wilderness of ' verdurous glooms and mossy, winding ways,' and in one of the meadows left at frequent intervals by the curves of the river, you come upon abroken gable and a disused graveyard. This is BrignallOld Church — as small in its best days as churches among North Country mountains and moors are wont to be — and if you go to the top of the bank above, and if it is a fair twilight in summer, you have the subject of this noble poem of Turner's before you. . . . " The design of the drawing is a very simple one. The Greta flows nearly in the middle of it, in a hollow with steep wooded banks on each side, the one above the church on the right being entirely lost in shadow and convex in curvature, the other still reflecting light from the western sky and show ing a bit of sheer precipice among the coppice wood. A wavy line of distance unites the two sides of the composition. In the base of the picture — we can hardly say foreground — there is a network of tree-tops (the characteristic yew not being forgotten) through whieh we can see the abyss gleaming below; and among these perilous boughs a boy is climbing after his kite which has dragged in its career, and been caught there, evidently with no chance of recovery. Mists are rising stealthily in the ravine, and beginning to lie in bands on the far-away desolate moors. . . . " This quiet little church in the valley was, as time went on, found to be inconvenient, especially for funerals, so, in 1834, a new and very ugly one was set up on the hill above, and, unfortunately, much of the old one was carried off to help to build it." 177. WYCLIFFE, NEAE EOKEBY. (Vol. I, p. 197.) Engraved by J. Pye. lOf by 7f. The Hall to right on the summit of a wooded hill, below which the river winds. Shallow, rocky bed of river in foreground. Two women in centre, driving geese. Waggon crossing ford. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Without any letters. Before rays of light behind Hall. Shadows of trees on right below Hall, separately defined. Sky unfinished. R., T. (b) Left, " Drawn by J. M. W. 1 Scott, ' Rokeby,' iii, 16. 98 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. Turner E.A. "; right, " Engraved by John Pye 1823," in italics. Eays added striking upwards behind Hall. Shadows of trees on right grouped. BM., R. N.B. — I have seen two " false proofs " of this plate ; the artists,' names are in Eoman type as in the First Pub. State, but the Title and Pub. line are missing, having been erased; faint traces of them are still visible. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as in Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, Mar. 1, 1823. " Printed by H. Triggs " low on right. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing, much faded, is in the possession of Mrs. George Holt. In the BM. is a curious impression of State (b), with a long inscription evidently written by Turner, etched in minute letters, filling the whole lower margin. It commences, "The Birthplace of John Wickcliffe (the Morning Star of Liberty) near Eokeby, York shire," and continues with a description of his career and the state of his times, from a strongly Protestant point of view. With the impression, is a memorandum by the late Dr. Percy, stating that he had been informed by Pye and Halsted (the printseller) that only three or four of these had been struck off, all for presentation. It may be added that Pye, the engraver of this beautiful plate, stated that Turner when touching the Proof, introduced a burst of light (the rays seen above the Hall) which was not in the Drawing, On being asked his reason, he replied: — "That is the place where Wickliffe was born and the light of the glorious Eeformation." "Well," said Pye, satisfied, "but what do you mean by these large geese?" "Oh, they are the old superstitions which the genius of the Eeformation is driving away! " Mrs. Alfred Hunt remarks: " The best thing in the Wycliffe drawing is its geese. They are beautifully worked in among the stones. Their outstretched necks and flapping wings almost make us near the 'Shoo! shoo!' of the girl who is clapping her hands and driving them on before her. . . . Turner certainly enjoyed the geese. The two or three on the right are putting their heads together in a very natural, and for the drawing, effective manner. . . . "The mists are breaking away from the thick woods below the Hall. The river, as it runs away from us, is drawn so as to suggest a greater height for our point of view than accords with the look of the river bed in the foreground. The rock on the left is veiy true to fact, allowance being made for the really small size of the bushes and tuft of vegetation upon it." LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 99 178. MEEEICK ABBEY, SWALEDALE. (Vol. I, p. 222.) Engraved by J. C. VarraU. 11 by 7|. The Abbey ruins in mid-distance on right, above river which flows below high, steep hills to left. Deep still reach of river in foreground. Eabbit on bank on right and sportsman behind. Engravers Proofs, (a) Before any letters, and before line round margin of plate. Touched and scraped all over by Turner. R. (b) Still b.a.l. Line added round margin. Lights added on water, etc. BM., R., Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, Dec. 1822. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing is in the possession of the Eev. W. Macgregor. Mrs. Alfred Hunt remarks: "The engraving is a very beautiful one, the drawing lovelier still. . , . The drawing of the hill on the left, with its rounded swells and scattered lines of wood, is exquisitely true to the actual fact; but the cows in the fore ground and trees everywhere are made so small, that in spite of its perfect drawing, the hill above looks too much like a mountain. ..." 179. AYSGAETH FOECE. (Vol. I, p. 401.) Engraved by J. Scott. 11 by 7\. Eiver in centre, descending in series of low, step-like falls, through rocky valley. Moorland beyond. Angler and boy by water in foreground. Engraver's Proofs. Left, "Turner E.A. delt"; right, "Scott sc1," in very small etched writing. BM., R., T., Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, June 1, 1820. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing, much but harmoniously faded, and still beautiful, is in the possession of Mr. Walter Jones. " Wensley Dale is the finest and most characteristic of the Yorkshire dales, and in spite of the neighbourhood of a railway station, and a restored church, Aysgarth is still the most exquisite spot to be found in it. Wordsworth has described the Force, and very inadequately, by saying that it is just such a piece of work as you might have expected from some giant gardener em- 100 ENGRAVED WORK OF' J. M. W. TURNER. ployed by one of Queen Elizabeth's courtiers, if this giant gardener had con sulted with Spenser, and the two had finished the work together. 'By this,' he goes on to say, ' you will understand that it is at once formal and wild.' This is rather a cumbrous method of expressing what Herrick put much more prettily when he spoke of ' a civil wilderness.' . . . Three successive ledges of rock stretch across the river and form Aysgarth Force, the subject of Turner's drawing. . . . "The character of the scene must have been very much changed by the growth of trees, probably planted since Turner's time. Otherwise the draw ing as a whole might have been used as a proof, if proof were ever really required, of that great artist's power of making a picture of a place wonder fully like the place, when he chose. The geological facts, however, as Turner has seized them, are verifiable now. The underworn and overlapping ledges of rock, seen either quite plainly, or partly veiled by the falling water, are drawn with a master's care and precision. The very history of the Fall has been consciously or unconsciously shown, and almost, it might be said, com mented on, by the choice and arrangement of the foreground. The waterfall, as Mr. Ruskin says, has plainly travelled back from the point in the fore ground where the figure is sitting, and the strong, sharp shadow of a much underworn bed of rock is made the darkest thing in the whole composition. Perhaps it may be well to admit — for fear of being supposed to confuse the truth of an artistic portrait with that of a scientific or photographic one — that Turner may have unwittingly compressed very slightly the width of the river's channel, and proportionately increased the height of the Fall, but the effect of the whole scene must have been of a wilder and grander kind when there was no line of tall trees at the back of the Fall — when the hillside or moorland was quite bare, and the grey fringes of the shower which has, per haps, just swollen the river, swept down, as in the drawing, almost to the edge." — Mrs. Alfred Hunt's Notes. 180. SIMMEE LAKE, NEAE ASKEIG. (Vol. I, p. 402.) Engraved by H. Le Keux. 10J- by 7-J. A small, round lake surrounded by mountains. Sun breaking through clouds overhead. Many figures and cows in foreground. Smoke on further side reflected in lake. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Left, " Drawn by J. M. W. Turner, E. A. " ; right, " Etch'd by H. Le Keux," in italics. Before Title. Touched by Turner. BM. (b) Title added on right, " Simmer Lake near Askrig" in italics. Sky and water completed. R., T., Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, Oct. 25, 1822. " Printed by McQueen and C° " in italics, low on right. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. George Salting. " Simmer Water or Seamer Water is about two miles from Bainbridge, among the hills, and though by no means comparable with any of the lakes LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 101 in Cumberland or Westmoreland, it is a very pretty little mountain mere, and under favourable conditions of light and atmosphere, often a great deal more than that. . . . The large block of limestone in the foreground of the engraving is known as the Carlow Stone. There is a tradition that the devil attempted to fling it from, the summit of Addleborough Hill— the high hill with the large cairn on the top of it, which rises on the eastern side of the lake— to Crag End on the western. He failed, however, to do this — was there ever a legend in which his endeavours did not fail! — and it fell where it now lies." — Mrs. Alfred Hunt's Notes. 71 181. MOSS DALE FALL. (Vol. I, p. 403.) Engraved by S. Middiman. lOf by 7\ On right, a narrow rocky gap among hills, through which, in front, a river falls. A second, more precipitous fall from high rocks on left. Goat on ledge in right foreground. Engraver's Proofs, (a) On right, " Etch" by S. Middiman 1822 " in etched italics. The darker parts unfinished throughout. R. (b) "Etchd by" altered to "Engd by." BM., R., T. Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as in Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, Aug. 22, 1822. "Printed by H. Triggs " low on right. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing is in the Fitzwilliam Museum at Cambridge (Euskin Donation). " Mossdale Fall in broad simple daylight is a very different thing from the transfiguration of it by a sunset effect which Turner has given us. The engraving is full of examples of his truthfulness in little things, and, if a certain enlargement of scale, due to the remembrance of an effect, be allowed for, in great ones also. Let it be confessed at once that Mossdale is a very small furrow in a moorland dale, with nothing Alpine about it, and that the descent from the heights above and to the right of the Fall, where the mists are gathering and a great peak appears to lift itself, down to the spectator's view at the bottom of the Fall, can be accomplished in a few minutes with a commonplace gate and fence, if we recollect rightly, in the way. Mists lying about after rain, on moor and moss, and touched by the light of a fading sunset, are great exaggerations of apparent size, and Turner never lost or failed to use his first impression. Anyhow, the knowledge and minuteness of detail which he, or the engraver, working under his direction, has put into the engraving, are wonderful. The drawing is altogether unlaboured — all the work being singularly swift, simple, and suggestive only of details, but they are all there notwithstanding. The pretty sprinkling of the falling water from ledge to ledge — the slight waving aside by the wind of its lowest leap — the wearing away of the rock shelves where it rests from time to time, and the expression of the gradual coming forward of the shelves themselves to the base of the cliff, although they are seen in full front only — are instances of beautiful truths of nature most picturesquely expressed. ... To return to the 102 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. engraving, the bushes are a little too much like trees — one especially on the top of the hill to the right does fix a false idea of the size of the dale. The main stream pouring over its perfectly straight ledge of rock on the right is absolutely true, and so are the jets of water trickling out of the limestone rock. A larch plantation, it may be noted, has now done much to destroy the grandeur of the scene, and diminish the largeness of it." — Mrs. Alfred Hunt's Notes. 182. HAEDEAW FALL. (Vol. I, p. 402.) Engraved by J. Pye. lOf by 7\. Eocky amphitheatre among hills; through cleft in centre, a slender fall in bright light. Deep shadow below and on right. Milkmaid in right foreground. Cows on left bank in sunshine. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Without any letters. Shadow of nearest cow on left bank square with back of cow. R., T., Th. (b) Shadow of cow unaltered. Left, " J. M. W. Turner E.A. de? "; right, " Pye Sculp"; centre, under plate line, "Middiman Sculp"; all in italics. Title and Pub. line as in Pub. States. T. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Title in italics. Left, " Drawn by J. M. W. Turner E.A."; centre, " Etched by S. Middiman "; right, " Egraved [sic] by John Pye " ; all in Eom. type. Pub. line Date, Oct. 1. 1815. Shadow of cow no longer square with back, but falls below it. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing, much faded, was in the possession of the late Mr, E. Steinkopff. " Hardraw Fall, the most striking waterfall in the district, is about a mile and a half from Hawes, and is approached by a footpath leading from the little inn at the entrance of the glen. . . . The Force is at the very end of a small, deep, narrow, horseshoe shaped glen, which is shut in by limestone cliffs about two hundred feet high. In the centre of the curve the fall leaps down to a depth of ninety-six feet, from the edge of the cliff in which, during the long course of time, it has worn for itself this channel, down to a stratum of limestone interposed between two beds of soft shale. . . . The engraving of Hardraw is said to be one on which John Pye especially prided himself." 183. CEOOK OF LUNE, LOOKING TOWAEDS HOENBY CASTLE. (Vol. II, p. 203.) Engraved by J. Archer. 11 by 7\. A wide stretch of country, with hills to left and beyond. Eiver winds in many loops from left, below steep banks. Smoke from a fire high on left. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 103 Engraver's Proofs. Before any letters. BM., R., T., Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, Aug. 10, 1821. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The beautiful Drawing, in fine condition, is in the possession of the Eev. W. Macgregor. " A more difficult subject than the ' Crook of Lune ' could hardly be set to any landscape designer. The windings of a river seen from a considerable height are hard to draw, and even when drawn rightly themselves require a good deal of management in the composition of the landscape around them, in order to make them illusively pleasant to the eye. " No artist ever equalled Turner in dealing with such subjects. This Lune- dale is, I think, one of the earliest examples of his power in this direction, which he afterwards used so magnificently in his drawing of the Seine from Chateau GaiUard and of the Tweed in the Scott illustrations of Melrose and Dryburgh, and many other designs. "In all these the river is really the principal subject, although the abbey or castle lends a grace to its curves, like a pretty clasp on a gleaming circlet. The Hornby Castle in the ' Crook of Lune ' is too small and distant to do this service, but the bridge, with the gate-tower at the end of it, serves instead. "The height of the horizon line must have made the drawing a tour de force in landscape art seventy years ago. The backbone of the composition is really the bulky promontory running out towards the right. The turfy slope with which it rises gives us a hardly perceived but really firm line running diagonally across it, but ending in a low cliff which breaks down to the river on that side of the picture. That cross line does really serve to bind up together the two principal links or glimpses of the river. Both the sweep of the river above the bridge and that which swirls round the narrow ravine on the left of the drawing are bound together by their both being at a certain angle to this line. The rocky promontory, of course, was there, but Turner has set his gorse bushes, or whatever they are, upon it, so as to leave a little fold of turf clear, and so obtain the bit of rectangular firmness which he wanted at that point. " Since Turner's time, the actual spot has been hardly used by plantations, and a gentleman's house, and changes of that kind. Turner's drawing, no doubt, gives an idea of a larger and grander scene than would be found in Lunedale now."^-Mrs. Alfred Hunt's Notes. 184. INGLEBOEOUGH, FEOM HOENBY CASTLE TEEEACE. (Vol. II, p. 250.) Engraved by C. Heath. lOf by 7\. Wooded hills on left, below which a river flows. Level meadows to right, with Ingleborough closing the view. In left foreground, parapet of Castle, from which view is taken. Peacock on right. Engraver's Proofs. Before any letters. BM., R., Th. 104 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, Jan. 2, 1822. " Printed by McQueen and Co " low on right. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. W. Law. " A very fine view of Ingleborough — ' that huge creature of God,' as the poet Gray calls it in one of nis delightful letters — is obtained from the terrace at Hornby Castle, and of all — ' The Mountains high Of Craven, whose blue heads for caps put on the sky ' — it is the most striking, though it has no right to the distinction claimed for it in the local rhyme : ' Ingleborough, Pendlehill, and Penyghent, Are the highest hills between Scotland and Trent ' — for Micke Fell is higher than any of them, and so is Whernside, but Ingle borough is so remarkable in shape that it is pre-eminent as a landmark never to be ignored or mistaken. It serves in this capacity even to ships on the Lancashire coast." — Mrs. Alfred Hunt's Notes. The Drawing was sold in 1881, in the Bale collection, for two thousand guineas — the record price at that time for a Turner draw ing. The purchaser was afterwards offered a still higher sum for it. 185. HOENBY CASTLE FEOM TATHAM CHUECH. (Vol. H, p. 263.) Engraved by W. Radclyffe. lOf by 7\. Valley in centre between wooded hills. A river crossed by bridge of a single arch on left. Castle on hill in mid-distance. Group of peasants in road in left foreground with a woman milking cow. Church in distance to right. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Eight, " W. Eadclyffe, fc, 1822" in etched italics. Before the many small lights all over the hills and woods to right. BM., T, Th. (b) Left, "Drawn by J. M. W. Turner, E.A."; right, "Engraved by W. Eadclyffe, 1822"; all in italics. Many small lights added all over the hills and woods on right. BM., R. (The two parallel lines round the margin are present in all States.) First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, June, 1822. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 105 The Drawing, completely faded from long exposure to light, is at South Kensington. ' ' In the ' Hornby Castle and Tatham Church ' we have the calm, untroubled sunshine of late afternoon, 'or, perhaps, of evening, if we lay much stress on a very faint shadow stealing sideways on the right of the bridge. The arrangement of this drawing is especially fine. The materials are most com plex — unmanageable, most artists would think — but we will enjoy the poetical beauty of the artist's work before giving a thought to the examination of his skill, and bring before our minds the pretty pastoral which he has invented — the hills which are not mountains but only screens and dividing ridges, set with gorse and heather, between this and other pleasant dales ; the river, gentle as its name of Lune for the most part, but seen hurrying a little here and there amid dwarf trees and old willows; the castle, by no means a frowning one ; and then, in the foreground, the group made up so cleverly, by the bridge, with light reflected upwards from the water, by the house and by the whole incident of cow-milking and the figures connected therewith, down to the very subordinate incident of the cat helping herself to the milk which the little girl has spilt on the ground. . . . Tne original drawing, now also sadly faded, is to be seen at South Kensington. If we examine the way in which the lines and colours are used, as such, we shall find that not one of them is used in vain. The harmony is too complete and complex to be other than instinctive, although, just as the greatest master of harmonious verse may labour long over a cadence, a pause, or a syllable in a line, Turner may well have used conscious ingenuity here and there. The whole space around, between, and at the foot of the two tall, rather thinly -leaved trees is full of subtle arrangements of form. The arch of the bridge would be too isolated and self-asserting if it were not broken just where it is by the tree- stem on the right. The stem on the left does the same office for the wall and chimney of the house. The curve of the arch between the two stems is re peated, but invertedly, by the depression of the hill between the same two stems above. The line of the roadway of the bridge is carried on in a subtly unseen way all across the picture by the cottage roof sloping down on the left, and the line of trees by the riverside on the right, and the rather far outlying church at the very edge of the view is saved from being too far away by being set on this line. The church is possibly one which has been, as Mr. Ruskin would say, ' fetched someway round the corner,' and topographical fact has had some share in its being brought in at all." — Mrs. Alfred Hunt's Notes. 186. KIEKBY LONSDALE CHUECHYAED. (Vol. II, p. 277.) Engraved by C. Heath. 11 by 7|. The church and churchyard on hill in foreground above river, which winds through valley from right, below hills; mists along its course. Boys throwing stones at pile of books on gravestone. Engraver's Proofs. Before any letters. BM., R., T., Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, Jan. 25, 1822. "Printed by M'Queen and Co " low on right. 106 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing, much faded, is in the possession of Sir Donald Currie. " Mr. Ruskin has said: ' I do not know in all my own country, still less in France or Italy, a place more naturally divine or a more priceless possession of true " Holy Land" than Kirkby Lonsdale,' and again: ' Whatever moor land hill and sweet river and English forest foliage can be at their best is gathered there, and chiefly seen from the steep bank which falls to the stream side from the upper part of the town itself. ' . . . ' ' Turner's drawing is very like the place, and he has overcome considerable difficulties in designmg it, for, like ' Aske Hall,' it is a view framed in as it were by nature between trees, and trees set in a line, and it is not easy to avoid a look of theatrical prettiness in a view of that kind." — Mrs. Alfred Hunt's Notes. 187. HEYSHAM AND CUMBEELAND MOUNTAINS. (VoLH, p. 317.) Engraved by W. R. Smith. lOf by 7|. Village to left among trees on shore of Morecambe Bay. Bay in centre, with distant mountains on further side. In foreground, women with cows, and gleaners. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Before any letters. Before white curving line of tide on right. T. Another, touched by Turner. BM. (b) Left, " Drawn by J. M. W. Turner, E.A."; right, "Engraved by W. E. Smith"; in italics. Lines of tide added on right. BM.,R., T, Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, Aug. 22, 1822. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. George Salting. ' ' The secondary title of this engraving is surely inaccurate. The mountains which rise over the bay and a stretch of low land towards the right are Con- iston Old Man and his compeers. There are no doubt some bits of Cumber land in the extreme distance on the left, but Coniston Old Man is in Lancashire."— Mrs. Alfred Hunt's Notes. Heysham is analyzed at length in Euskin's ' Elements of Drawing,' pp. 325-330. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 107 188. WEATHEECOTE CAVE WHEN HALF FILLED WITH WATEE. (Vol. II, p. 342.) Engraved by S. Middiman. 10^- by 7\. A wall of rock in foreground, covered with trees. On right, through the trees, a river falls almost perpendicularly; a small stream also falls on left. Eainbow low down between the falls. Steep, rocky hills above. Engraver's Proofs, (a) " Etch'd by S. Middiman, 1821 " in centre, in etched writing. Completed except light clouds in upper sky. BM., T., Th. (b) "Etch'd by" altered to "Engd by." Sky finished. BM., R., T., Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as Richmond Castle and Town, No. 170. Pub. line Date, Oct. 30, 1822. " Printed by H. Triggs " low on right. Second State. On plain paper. Same lettering. Reprints. As Richmond, Yorkshire, No. 169. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. George Salting. XXXII THE PROVINCIAL ANTIQUITIES OF SCOTLAND, 1819—1826 An account of this work will be found in the Introduction, pp. xxxv-vi. It was originally published in Parts, which on com pletion were issued in two volumes, at the following prices : Proofs on India Paper, Imperial Quarto, price J215 Prints, Eoyal Quarto .... =£8 The ' Provincial Antiquities of Scotland ' was very successful, and the publishers, recognizing that this was largely due to Sir Walter Scott, who had taken a keen interest in it from the first and had written the letterpress gratuitously, presented him with all Turner's drawings for the work. They remained at Abbotsford until quite a recent date. In addition to Turner's illustrations, many of those by other artists are attractive — notably Calcott's Edinburgh from St. 108 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. Anthony's Chapel, and the Eev. J. Thomson's Fast Castle and Roslin Castle. The standard of execution in the engravings is high throughout. Very few of the Touched Proofs appear to have sur vived. 189. VIGNETTE TITLE TO VOL. I. Engraved by George Cooke. About 5 by 4. Edinburgh Castle; horsemen entering arched gateway beneath. Below, in foreground, trophy of broadswords, shields, bagpipe, etc. Engraver's Proof. Without any lettering except artists' names, which are in italics. T. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Left, "Drawn by J. M. W. Turner E.A. 1825"; right, "Engraved by George Cooke." Title, etc., at top in shaded Eom. caps. Pub. line Date, 1826. Later States. Same lettering, but on plain paper. A slight sketch for the vignette is in the National Gallery. 190. BOETHWICK CASTLE. (Vol. I, p. 29.) Engraved by H. Le Keux. 9f by 6f . High, square keep of castle in centre on low hill; higher hills close the valley. Below castle, trees and cottages; men with horses fording river. Engraver's Proofs. Title to left and artists' names in italics. BM., R., T., Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper (Imperial Quarto). Title in centre in open caps; artists' names in small Eom. type. Pub. line Date, April 2, 1819. Later States. Same lettering, on plain paper. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. T. Brocklebank. 191. CEICHTON CASTLE. (Vol. I, p. 51.) Engraved by George Cooke. 9f by 6f . The Castle in centre on steep hill; valley below with stream. Wooded hills to left. In foreground, woman driving cows; man in plaid to right. Engraver's Proof. Before Title. Artists' names in small Eom. type. Lower part of wooded hill to left is bare of trees. R. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 109 First Pub. State. On India Paper. Title in centre in open caps; artists' names in small Eom. type. Pub. line Date, Aug. 1, 1819. " Printed by B. McQueen " below Title. Trees on hill to left are continued to base. Later States. Same lettering, on plain paper. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. T. Brocklebank. *#* A small later Eeplica of this plate will be described with Tilt's ' Illustrations to Scott.' 192. HIGH STEEET, EDINBUEGH. (Vol. I, p. 68.) Engraved by H. Le Keux and G. Cooke. 9f by 6\. Open space at top of High Street, looking eastward. St. Giles* Church in centre. Many figures around pedlar's and other stalls in foreground. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Title in centre in open caps; artists' names in slender Eom. caps; under plate-line, "The Figures engraved by G. Cooke." Pub. line Date, Dec. 20, 1819; below, in centre, " Printed by B. McQueen." Later States. Same lettering, on plain paper. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. T. Brocklebank. 193. EDINBUEGH FEOM THE CALTON HILL. (Vol. I, p. 83.) Engraved by George Cooke. 10 by 6§ . A bird's eye view of the city from the top of the Calton Hill; the Castle and the old Town high in centre and to left. Women spreading clothes to dry in foreground. Engraver's Proofs. A Touched Proof in the collection of Mr. Bul- lard of Boston, U.S.A., has a series of notes by Turner of great interest which will be found quoted in extenso on pp. lxxi-ii of the Introduction. Later Proofs. Completed. Title in centre, in etched, leaning caps. Artists' names in italics. BM., R., T., Th. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Title in centre in open caps ; artists' names in small slender caps. Pub. line Date, Nov. 1, 1820. " Printed by McQueen and C° " low on right. Later States. Same lettering, on plain paper. .110 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. T. Brocklebank. This is perhaps the finest of all Turner's plates in the work, and it is superbly engraved. 194. VIGNETTE TITLE TO VOL. II. Engraved by R. Wallis. About 7^ by 7-f. Distant view of Edinburgh from Leith Harbour. Man-of-war in centre saluting. Sun setting behind. Two clasped hands between star of St. George and St. Andrew. Engraver's Proof. Without any letters. T. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Artists' names in italics; title above in shaded letters. Below, " Vol. II " and Pub. line Date, 1826. Later States. Same lettering, on plain paper. 195. HEEIOT'S HOSPITAL. (Vol. II, p. 97.) Engraved by if. Le Keux. 9^ by 6§. The Hospital, high in distance, seen above lower houses. An open space in foreground, covered with stalls, figures, etc. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Without any letters. R., T. (b) Title on left (spelt " Herriotts "), and artists' names, in italics. In centre - " The Figures etched by G. Cooke." BM., T. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Title in centre in open caps; artists' names in small slender caps. Pub. line Date, Nov. 1, 1822. " Printed by McQueen and C° " low to right. Later States. Same lettering, on plain paper. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. T. Brocklebank. 196. EOSLIN CASTLE. (Vol. II, p. 127.) Engraved by W. R. Smith. 9f by 6J. A ravine on the right with steep, wooded rocky banks, and stream below. The Castle high on left above trees. Angler wading on right. Engraver' s Proof s. Before Title. Left, " Drawn by J. M. W. Turner E.A. "; right, "Etched by W. E. Smith"; both in italics. BM.,R. First Pub. State. On. India Paper. Title in, centre in open caps-; LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. Ill artists' names in small, slender caps. Pub. line Date, Nov. 1, 1822. " Printed by McQueen and C° " low to right. Later States. Same lettering, on plain paper. Reprint. In the BM. is a worn impression with Pub. line, " London, published July 1835, by Charles Tilt, 86 Fleet Street." The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. T. Brocklebank. *#* A small later Eeplica of this plate will be described with Tilt's 'Illustrations to Scott.' This is a very beautiful plate and finely engraved. 197. DUNBAE. (Vol. II, p. 127.) Engraved by J. C. Allen. 10|- by 6|. The Castle ruins extending along a rocky ridge of coast which stretches across the plate. Heavy sea breaking in front, and cap sized boat to which men are clinging, in left foreground. Engraver's Proof. Title in centre in etched leaning caps. Artists' names in italics. R. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Title in centre in open caps. Artists' names in small Eom. type. Pub. line Date, May 1, 1824. " Printed by McQueen " low on right. Later States. Same lettering, on plain paper. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. T. Brocklebank. 198. TANTALLON CASTLE. (Vol. II, p. 160.) Engraved by E. Goodall. 9j by 6§ . Castle in distance on left on rocky promontory above the sea, which is breaking with high spray over rocks in foreground and to right. On left, woman with dog and man with pitcher. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Early. Before Title. In centre, under plate-line, " Etched by E. Goodall," in italics. Sky, and plate generally, incomplete. R. (b) Work nearly completed. " Etched by," etc., erased, but still showing. R. (c) Completed, but before Title. Artists' names in italics. BM., R. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Title in open caps. Artists' names in small slender caps. Pub. line Date, June 1, 1822. " Printed by McQueen and C° " low on right. Later States. Same lettering, on plain paper. 112 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. T. Brocklebank. *#* A small later Eeplica of this plate will be described with Tilt's 'Illustrations to Scott.' The engraving of the sea and sky here is finely executed. 199. LINLITHGOW PALACE. (Vol. II, p. 169.) Engraved by R. Wallis. 9f by 6f . The castellated Palace and the church tower with open corona, among trees on the further shore of a small loch. In foreground, cows, figures, and a dog, on the shore. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Before Title. Left, " Drawn by J. M. W. Turner E.A. " ; right, " Etched by Eob* Wallis " in italics. Burin work throughout not fully completed. T. (b) Title in centre in open caps. Artists' names in small slender caps. Pub: line Date, July 1, 1822. Completed, but before printers' name. R. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Lettering as in preceding, with " Printed by McQueen and C° " added, low on right. Later States. Same lettering. Many fewer diagonal strokes of white light on small pool under tall tree on right. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. T. Brocklebank. 200. BASS EOCK. (Vol. II, p. 181.) Engraved by W. Miller. 10 by 6T. The Bass Eock in centre, in light, surrounded by stormy sea. Thunder-storm behind, with lightning from right. On left, boat's crew rescuing drowning sailors from wreckage. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Title on left; left, "Drawn by J. M. W. Turner E.A."; right, "Etched by Will"1 Miller "; all in italics. Nearly completed. BM. (b) Completed. " Etched by " altered to " Engraved by." BM., R. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Title in centre in open caps. Artists' names in small slender caps. Pub. line Date, May 1, 1826. " Printed by McQueen " low on right. Later States. Same lettering, on plain paper. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. T. Brocklebank. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 113 XXXIII 201. STEVENSON'S ' BELL EOCK LIGHT HOUSE.' 1824. Engraved by J. Horsburgh. 8f- by 5-|. Lighthouse in centre in thunder-storm. Heavy sea breaking round it. Sailing boat to left. Engraver's Proof. Without any letters. Touched by Turner. Before the lightning on extreme left. R. First Pub. State. On India paper. Title in centre in open caps ; artists' names in small Eoman type; "Printed by McQueen " low on right. Lightning added. This fine plate is the frontispiece to Eobert Stevenson's ' Account of the Bell Eock Light House.' Edinburgh, 1824. A large line en graving of the same subject was executed by W. Miller in 1864. I have been unable to trace the Drawing. XXXIV 202. EHEENBEEITSTEIN, DUEING THE DEMOLITION OF THE FOETEESS IN 1817. Single Plate. 1824. Engraved by J. C. Allen, llf by 7\. The Fortress high on the right, above the Ehine. White smoke rising from explosion at base. Quay, with boats and figures, in left foreground. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Title (Ehrenbreitstein) in centre in etched, slender caps. Artists' names in etched italics. Before Pub. line. R., T. (b) Pub. line added in etched italics. Date, May 1, 1824. First Pub. State. Title in open Eom. caps. Artists' names in small Eom. type. " Proof " to right. Second State. A line in each of the caps of Title. The Drawing is in the Bury Art Gallery. 114 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. XXXV 203. COLOGNE. Single Plate. 1824. Engraved by E. Goodall. 18^ by 13J. The Ehine in front with many boats, rafts and figures, some bathing. Tall machicolated tower and old walls to left. Cathedral and town beyond. Engraver's Proof. Before Title. Left, " Drawn by J. M. W. Turner E.A."; right, "Etched by Edwd Goodall"; both in italics. Touched by Turner. R. First Pub. State. On India Paper. Still before Title. "Etched by" altered to "Engraved by." Pub. line Date, March 1, 1824. " Printed by McQueen " low on right. Second State. On plain paper. Title in centre in open Eom. caps. Artists' names in small, slender caps. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. George Gould, U.S.A. XXXVI 204. WILTON HOUSE. 1825. Engraved by T. Higham. 9 by 6|. The Mansion, to left, occupies most of the plate. Lawn in front, trees to right. On left, two saddled horses with grooms. As Published. Title in centre in open caps ; beneath it, in brackets, " Ut ohm." Left, " Turner, del " ; right, " T. Higham, Sculp. " ; both in italics. Below, " Published by Sir Eichd Colt Hoare Bar1, Jan. 1, 1825." At top of plate, " Plate VIII." R. This plate appeared, I believe, in Vol. V of Sir Eichard Colt Hoare's ' History of Modern Wiltshire,' privately published. The Drawing, interleaved in a copy of the book, was sold with the Stourhead heirlooms a few years ago. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 115 XXXVII 205. THE CUSTOM HOUSE. 1827. Engraved by J. C. Allen. 9-| by 5^. The Custom House to right with the Monument behind. Quays, barges, and shipping in front. The dome of St. Paul's in distance. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Before Title. Artists' names in faint italics. R„ T. (b) Title in centre in etched italic caps; before Pub. line. BM. First Pub. State. Same lettering, with Pub. line added in italics. Date, Jan. 1, 1827. Second State. Title in open Eom. caps. Pub. line in Eom. small type. Third State. A line in each of the caps of Title. The Drawing was in the Hibbert Sale at Christie's in 1860. 1 believe that this print and the one following were published as a pair, and not as book illustrations. 206. OLD LONDON BEIDGE AND VICINITY. 1827. Engraved by E. GoodaU. 10f by 7. The Bridge in centre in mid-distance, seen from quay of Custom House. Shipping and barges to right and left. On buoy to left is " Port of London." Engraver's Proofs. Before Title. Left, "Drawn by J. M. W. Turner E.A."; right, "Etched by Edw" Goodall"; in italics. BM., R. First Pub. State. Same lettering, with Pub. line added, also in italics. Date, June 1, 1827. " Printed by McQueen " low on right. Second State. Title in open Eom. caps; artists' names and Pub. line in small Eom. type. "Proof" on right. Third and Later States. A line in all the caps of Title. " Proof " removed. The Drawing is in the Jones Bequest at South Kensington, under the title of " The Port of London." 116 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. XXXVIII 207. TIVOLI. A COMPOSITION. Single Plate. 1827. Engraved by E. Goodall. 23f by 15|. Still reach of river in front, with ruined, classical temple high on right; towers and buildings on steep cliffs beyond. High, dark trees to left. Campagna in distance, over which sun is setting. Women and goat in foreground. Engraver's Proof. Before Title and Pub. line. Artists' names in italics. Completed. R. First Pub. State. Title in centre in open caps. Below, Dedication to Sir Thomas Lawrence, P.E.A., etc. Artists' names in small Eom. letters. At foot, " London, Published for the Proprietor, J. Allnutt Esqr, by Colnaghi and Son, Pall Mall East, 1827." " Printed by M°Queen " low on right. The Drawing is in the possession of Lord Joicey. This beautiful plate was engraved for Mr. Allnutt, of Clapham, a well-known patron of Turner. The Open Etching is also very attractive. XXXIX 208. THE TEMPLE OF JUPITEE IN THE ISLAND OF .EGINA. Single Plate. 1828. Engraved by John Pye (Etched by S. Middiman). 22| by 15. The Temple (in its original state) high in mid-distance, sur rounded by other classical buildings. Sea in distance on right. Clump of tall trees in centre and another to left, with distant view of sea between. Procession of classical figures in foreground. Engraver's Proofs, (a) Very early. Burin work only commenced. In centre, below plate-line, in minute italics, " S. Middiman et J. Pye aquafortis fecit 1824." BM. (b) Burin work advanced, except on sky. Without any lettering. R. (c) Plate nearly completed, but still without any lettering. R. (d) Completed. Left, "J. M. W. Turner, E.A."; right, "John Pye, London, 1827 "; in italics. Before Title. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 117 First Pub. State. Before Title. Artists' names in slender caps. Pub. line Date, Jan. 1, 1828. " Printed by McQueen " on right. Second State. Title added in open Eom. caps. Artists' names in Eom. caps. In centre under plate-line, "Etched by S. Middiman and John Pye " in small Eom. type. Dedication to Lord Lynd- hurst, coat of arms, etc. Printer's name on left. Third State. A line in centre of all the caps of Title. Fourth State. Printer's name removed. It is uncertain from what Picture or Drawing this engraving was taken. XL 'PICTURESQUE VIEWS IN ENGLAND AND WALES,' 1827—1838 A full account of this beautiful but ill-fated work will be found in the Introduction (pp. xlvii-1). The plates were all engraved on copper, steel not yet having come into general use. The copper plates, along with almost the entire stock of the engravings, were found in Turner's house at his death; the former were broken up at Christie's before the great Sales in 1873 and 1874. The late Mr. Henry Graves, the publisher, told me that the plates were usually engraved as fast as Turner supplied the draw ings, so that the date on each print always corresponds within about a year with that of the drawing. Volume I, containing sixty plates, appeared in 1832. Volume II, owing to the want of success, was stopped when thirty-six more had been completed. The volumes were afterwards re-divided into forty-eight plates each. A few unengraved drawings survive, which to judge from their style and size, may very probably have been intended for the work. One of these, Exeter College, Oxford, is in the National Gallery, and others are in private collections, but the ascription is in every case only conjectural. The so-called 'Continuation of the England and Wales' is described on pp. 169-173. 118 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER The original advertised prices were: India Proofs before letters, Colombier folio, with the Etchings .£48 per vol. India Proofs before letters, Colombier folio, without the Etchings .£40 „ Ditto, with letters, Imperial Quarto (30 copies only printed) ... ... ... .£24 „ Proofs, Imperial Quarto ... ... ..: iii 5 15s. „ Prints, Eoyal Quarto ... ... ... <£10 10s. „ 209. EIEVAULX ABBEY, YOEKSHIEE. (Part I, No. 1.) Engraved by E. Goodall. 9| by 6^. The Abbey ruins in sunlight, in mid-distance, in centre of valley between wooded hills. Eiver in foreground with angler standing in water on left. Engraver's Proofs. Before Title. In centre under plate-line, "Etched by E. Goodall from a drawing by J. M. W. Turner, E.A.", in italics. Nearly completed. BM., R. Another, touched by Turner. T. First Pub. State. Still before Title. " Etched by " removed; other lettering unaltered. Before Pub. line and printer's name. Second State. ' India Proofs.' On India paper. Title and artists' names in italics. "Published March 1, 1827, for the Proprietor, by Eobert Jennings, Poultry." " Printed by McQueen," low on right. Third State. ' Large Paper Proofs.' On plain paper, Imperial Quarto. Same lettering as preceding. Fourth State. ' Prints.' On plain paper, Eoyal Quarto. Same let tering. *#* It will be observed throughout the ' England and Wales,' that the only differences that can be defined after the First Pub. State, lie either in the nature or the size of the paper, and the size has since been frequently altered in binding the plates. But there is, of course, a gradual but distinct depreciation in each succeeding issue, especially after the Second State, the impressions of which are always fine, only thirty sets having been printed. Yet even the Fourth State — the 'Prints' — are fairly good, Turner not having allowed too many to be printed, and, after Heath's bankruptcy, having bought back the copper-plates to prevent their falling into unscrupulous hands. (See Introduction, p. xlviii.) The Drawing is in the possession of Sir Donald Currie, G.C.M.G. LINE ENGRAVINGS ON COPPER. 119 In this charming plate the characteristic attitude of the angler, who is tying on a fly while wading, is very noticeable. Only a fisherman could have drawn it. At the same time the long, slender, tapering line of the rod is of the greatest value to the composition, as may be seen by covering it up. 210. LANCASTEE FEOM THE AQUEDUCT BEIDGE. (Part I, No. 2.) Engraved by R. Wallis. 9^ by 6^. The Town in distance with castle on height, seen from canal aqueduct, which crosses the river in foreground. Cornfield with reapers on flats by river below. " Lancaster " on barge to right. Engraver's Proofs. Before Title. Left, " Drawn by J. M. W. Turner E.A."; right, " Etchd by Eob1 Wallis," in italics. Nearly com pleted, but with many fewer figures in cornfield than after. BM., R. Later Proof, with the additional figures scratched white, and de tails for engraver drawn in pencil on margin bv Turner. BM. First Pub. State. Still before Title. " Etch" by "altered to " Engr. by." Before Pub. line and printer's name. Many reapers added in cornfield, especially at right corner below angle of parapet. Second State. ' India Proofs.' On India paper. Title and artists' names in italics. Pub. line Date, March 1, 1827. Third State. 'Large Paper Proofs.' On plain paper, Imperial Quarto. Same lettering as preceding. Fourth State. ' Prints.' On plain paper, Eoyal Quarto. Same lettering. There are two Drawings of this subject, differing in size, but both apparently by Turner's hand. One is in the possession of Mr. W. H. Lever, M.P. 211. DAETMOUTH COVE. (Part I, No. 3.) Engraved by W. R. Smith. 9 by 6^ The winding, landlocked harbour to right and left, divided by high, wooded hills in centre. Town and shipping to right. Large party of sailors and women in foreground. Engraver's Proofs. Without any lettering. Nearly completed. BM., R. One in BM. is touched by Turner, with instructions in margin — "All the broad lights Burnished." First Pub. State. Before Title and Pub. line. Left, " Drawn by J. M. W. Turner E.A."; right, " Engraved by W. E. Smith "; in italics. 120 ENGRAVED WORK OF J. M. W. TURNER. Second and Later States. As Rievaulx Abbey, No. 209. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. Holbrook GaskelL This view of Dartmouth is totally different from the earlier ones in 'The Southern Coast' and in 'The Eivers of England,' and is, I think, much more beautiful. 212. BOLTON ABBEY, YOEKSHIEE. (Part I, No. 4.) Engraved by R. Wallis. 9 by 6T7B-. The gable end of Abbey ruins to left, seen through trees. To right the Wharfe flowing beneath high, precipitous rocks. Angler seated by river in foreground. First Pub. State. Eight, " Engraved by Eob' Wallis 1827." Before Title, etc. Second and Later States. As Rievaulx Abbey, No. 209. The Drawing is in the possession of Mr. W. H. Lever, M.P. Mr. Euskin has written at length on the Drawing for this plate. He says (' M. P.,' vol. iv, p. 254): " But Turner evidently felt that the claims upon his regard possessed hy those places which first had opened to him the joy, and the labour, of his life, could never be superseded; no Alpine cloud could efface, no Italian sunbeam outshine, the memory of the pleasant dales and days of Rokeby and Bolton ; and mapy a simple promontory, dim with southern olive,— many a low cliff that stooped unnoticed over some alien wave, was recorded by him with a love, and delicate care, that were the shadows of old thoughts and long-lost delights, whose charm yet hung like morning mist above the chanting waves of Wharfe and Greta." . . . "With all his heart, he was attached to the narrow meadows and rounded knolls of England ; by all his imagination he was urged to the reverence of endless vales and measureless hills : nor could any scene be too contracted for his love, or too vast fpr his ambition. Hence, when he returned to English scenery after his first studies in Savoy and Dauphine, he was continually endeavouring to reconcile old fondnesses with new sublimities; and, as in Switzerland he chose rounded Alps for the love of Yorkshire, so in York shire he exaggerated scale, in memory of Switzerland." . . . " The Abbey is placed, as most loyers of our English scenery know well, on a little promontory of level park land, enclosed by one of the sweeps of the Wharfe. On the other side of the river, the flank of the dale rises in a pretty wooded brow, which the river, leaning against, has cut into two or three somewhat bold masses of rock, steep to the >vater's edge, but feathered above with copse of ash and oak.1 Above these rocks, the hills are rounded softly upwards to the moorland; the entire height of the brow towards the river being perhaps two hundred feet, and the rocky parts of it not above forty or fifty, so that the general impression upon the