YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY tJ%lo??t,cc/ic0JUZltul:fy^ The Life and Letters of SAMUEL PALMER Painter and Etcher WRITTEN AND EDITED BT A. H. Palmer Illustrated LONDON Published by Seeley & Co., Limited Essex Street, in the Strand, 1892 CONTENTS Preface . . ... List of Illustrations The Life of Samiel Palmer . The Letters of Samuel Palmer ro- Barlow, Mr. T. O., R.A. Calvert, Mr. E. Clergyman, a young Cope, Mr. C. W., R.A. George, Mrs. Gilchrist, Mrs. A. . Giles, Mr. John . . . ,, Mr. Samuel . Hamerton, Mr. P. G. I'ACI. xi xv 1-170 CHI. September 3° 1876 365 X. October 9 1838 194 XIII. July 25 1848 211 XXII. ,, n 1861 230 LXVI. February 1869 298 XXVII. June 1862 237 XXVIII. .1 21 ») 239 XX XIV. February 1863 252 LXXXIII. September 1872 32S CXX. July 27 1880 388 XX1II. November 2 1861 ¦ 230 XXV. March IO 1862 • 232 LXX. October 1870 3°7 XXIV. December 9 1861 23' XXIX. June 27 1862 240 XXX. ,, 2 ., 243 XXXI. September )» 247 XXXIII. January 1863 251 Lxnr. May 1 868 • 294 XI. October 28 1838 201 LXXIV. J»iy 8 1871 314 CONTENTS. Hamerton, Mr. P. G. continued Hook, Mr. B. ,, ., • Hook, Mr. J. C, R.A. », ,, Linnell, Mr. John . Palmer, A. H. . Palmer, T. M. . Redgrave, Mr. R., R.A. Redgrave, Mrs. R. Redgrave, Miss Frances Reed, Mr. John LXXV. October 1871 . PAGE 316 LXXIX. January 26 1872 . 322 LXXXII. August S> 327 LXXXVIII. November ft 333 LXXXIX. November 9 J) 334 XCII. February 1874 - 343 C. November 2 1875 360 CXI. February 17 1879 . 375 CXII. August 4 9) 377 CXIII. October 13 91 378 LXXIII. June 1871 3H CXXVII. March 26 1881 401 XXXV. May 1863 . 253 CXXI. August 13 1880 390 I. December 21 1828 173 II. May 17 1829 177 LIV. October 14 1866 . 282 LV. November 4 >1 283 LVI. >> J ) 2S6 LXI. 1867 . 292 LXXXT. June 1872 326 XIX. ,, 1859 223 XLVII. July 14 1865 273 LIII. October 1 1866 . 281 CH. March 1876 . 363 LXII. November 16 1867 293 L. July 6 1866 277 LXVIII. September 1869 . 305 CI. January 1876 . 36x XV. ,, 26 1858 , 216 XXI. 1861 22S CONTENTS Richmond, Mr. G., R.A, Richmond, Mr. & Mrs. G. . Richmond, Mr. John . . Richmond, Miss Julia {see Robinson) Richmond, Miss Laura Richmond, Messrs. W. & J. Robinson, Mrs. (see Rich mond, Miss Julia) ... Seeley, Mr. R. , , ,» • Stephens, Mr. F. G. Twining, Miss Louisa -Valpy, Mr. L. R. EN IS. vii III. Sc|itemlii.i 2. 1S3J ' 1 7K IV. UclollLT '4 '•Hi 180 V. ., 1(1 ,, 182 vn. Auguxt I'l 1835 • 188 VIII. June 1838 190 1.X1X. December 1869 306 XCIII. June I 1874 347 VI. ¦835 184 IX. September 16 1838 . 193 LXXV1II. November 1871 . 320 HI. September 1 866 279 XXXII. 1862 1865 248 270 XLV. April XCI. December 9 1872 34i LXXXV. November 2 ¦, 329 LXXXVI. ,, 6 ., 330 LXXX. May 4 >, • 324 LXXXVII. November C > ) 332 CVIII. October 4 1877 37i XIV. August 1856 . 213 XVIII. October 28 ,S58 222 XX. December i860 225 XLH. November 22 1864 . 264 CXVI. , , 18 ¦879 382 XXXVI. June 1864 254 XXXVII. August .. 256 XXXVIII. September > - 257 XXXIX. ., t, 259 XL. October ) j 261 CONTENTS. Valpy, Mr L. R. continued Wilkinson, Miss Williams, Dr. W. Williams, Mr. W. XLI. November 1864 262 XLIII. February 1865 267 XLIV. , , 3 ' 268 XLVI. June 3 » 272 XLVIII. December >, 274 XLIX. February 1866 . 275 Ll. August 27 J) 278 LVII. September 13 1867 289 LVIII. ,, J J 289 LIX. October 21 13 290 LX. November 6 >) 291 LXIV. September 1868 296 LXVII. March 16 1869 304 LXXI. December 13 1870 3C9 LXXII. January 1 1871 310 LXXVI. LXXVII. November 11 318 320 XC. » , 1872 340 XCV. February 1 1875 352 XCVIII. May >, 356 XCIX. ,, > J 358 ex. September S 1878 374 CXXV. February 16 1881 395 Extracts from Letiers to- 397 XVI. May 1858 218 XVII. September 17 1858 , 219 XXVI. May 29 1862 233 XII. March iS 1839 209 CXVII. December 26 1879 ¦ 384 CXVIII. 11 • 385 CXIX. July 20 1880 • 387 A Catalogue of the exhibited Works and the Etchings of Samuel Palmer 405 PREFACE About ten years ago, when I was writing a short memoir of my father, it occurred to me that a companion volume of his letters might be published. I knew that many of these were preserved by his friends, and esteemed not only on account of regard for the writer, but for what was thought considerable originality. Yet I was not prepared for the extent of the collection which was most courteously placed at my disposal, carrying with it, by virtue of its very existence, the evidence of some merit. The publication of the volume was postponed ; but the delay was by no means unfortunate, inasmuch as it gave me leisure to sift the material and reject that which was unsuitable, while applying myself, at the same time, to a closer and more unprejudiced study of my father's life. There being an analogy between writing dashed off, for the most part, without the slightest thought of publicity, or of literary precision, and rapid sketches from nature done with a purpose and a will, I thought there would be as much danger in tampering in the one case as there always is in the other, and that it would be best to leave the selected letters to stand or fall on their own merits, without the manipulation such collections have sometimes received. Nevertheless I deemed it well to omit passages that were of no interest whatever except to my father's correspondents, the omissions being indicated in the usual way. A few explanatory comments were necessary ; but I compressed these within the narrowest possible bounds. I was unable to fill up the gap between the years 1839 and 1848, having no letters of any interest at my disposal written within that period. Should any such exist I should be grateful for the loan of them. As time went on, I became more and more impressed by the inadequacy and unworthiness of the memoir I have mentioned (a tyro's xii PREFACE. work, superficial, and in some respects misleading), and I thought it would be well to accompany the letters with a new biography which should be more worthy of its subject, and which, above all things, should be true. I therefore began a careful study of all my father's memoranda, artistic and otherwise ; of his numerous old pocket-books, his business papers, and particularly of what I will call (for want of a better term) his shorthand notes from nature. These consisted in innumerable little blots and scratches and hastily scribbled hints or impressions, which, slight as they were, bore a far more important part in the artist's professional career and in the growth of his best works than might be supposed. Many of the rejected letters contained, like the memoranda, passages of biographical or artistic interest, and I decided to quote these passages freely, that, even at the risk of an appearance of patch-work, my father's story might be told as far as possible in his own words. To those who have read the old life I wish to commend the new, because the relations of the two may be compared to the relations of a somewhat inaccurate and meagre table of contents to any work and the work itself. Even my father's most intimate friends will find that there is something to be learned of his career which is new to them, for much that I have quoted no eyes but his own ever saw before, while of those struggles with adversity which did so much to shape and to ripen his character, few persons knew the full extent. When the manuscript of the Life and Letters was finished I availed myself of the valuable help of Mr. Allan J. Hook, to whose just and pertinent criticisms I consider myself very greatly indebted. The list of my father's exhibited works and etchings I believe to be fairly accurate and complete ; and for this completeness I am much beholden to Mr. F. G. Stephens and Mr. Allan J. Hook, who kindly searched the Royal Academy and some other catalogues. For the list of the works exhibited by the Royal Society of Painters in Water Colours I am responsible myself. The illustrations in this volume were chosen with some difficulty, and with the advantage of Mr. Seeley 's advice, from a large mass of material. As much of my father's work is most difficult to render by any photo graphic method, we thought it well to choose such examples as could PREFACE. xiii be dealt with with some prospect of success, and which at the same time should be fairly representative. The portrait is a reproduction of a life-size stump drawing which, as the crude work of a student, will perhaps escape very harsh criticism. It is given as the only portrait in existence showing my father at that age — an age when, mentally, he was in the prime of life. The device upon the cover is taken from the statue of Endymion in the British Museum. This beautiful figure is mentioned by my father (by the name of " The Sleeping Mercury ") as a test of taste and of the imaginative faculty. See the Letters, pages 183 and 261. A. H. Palmer. Tilford, Surrey. October, 1891. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Portrait of Samuel Palmer, aged 63. From a Chalk Drawing by A. II. Palmer . .... .... Frontispiece The Willow. An original Etching by Samuel Palmer, executed on his admission to the Etching Club, 1850 . . page 2 In Lullingstone Park, near Shoreham. Pencil Sketch from Nature . 44 Ruth returned from Gleaning. Monochrome Design. Shoreham. Ex hibited at the Royal Academy 1S29 . . 48 The Bright Cloud. Monochrome Design. Shoreham . . 48 Villa D'Este. A Water-colour Sketch from Nature . . 60 Vesuvius 1838. One of a series of Water-colour Sketches of the Mountain as seen from Pompeii while in eruption . . . 70 A Storm on the Cornish Coast. A Water-colour Sketch, from which was taken the motive of ll'nrivJ at Home, exhibited in 1862 . . 70 The Water-mill. Water-colour Drawing known to the Artist as The Margate Mottle. See Life, page 88 88 Mouth Mill, near Clovelly. Pencil Sketch from Nature 106 Clovelly Park. ,, ,, . 106 A Churchyard Yew. Sketch from Nature . 122 Designs at Shoreham. Sepia . . 172 Tintern Abbey. Water-colour Sketch from Nature 188 Florence. ,, ,, . . 206 Pele Point, Land's End. Pencil Sketch from Nature . . ..... 212 A Study of Sea. Cornwall. ,, .... 212 A Pifferaro. Water-colour Sketch from Life . 234 Crossing the Brook. A Water-colour Drawing. Unfinished 266 In Clovelly Park. A Sketch from Nature, in Chalk and Coloured Crayons 322 The Capitol. Water-colour Sketch from Nature ... 344 A Kentish Hop Garden. Shoreham. Pen and Ink. In the text ... .405 Crickets. A Study from Life. Chalk, ,, 422 THE LIFE OF SAMUEL PALMER X THE LIFE OF SAMUEL PALMER CHAPTER I 1805 TO 1826 Eighty-six years ago Surrey Square, in the parish of St. Mary's Newington, was not severed by interminable streets from every country association. From the upper windows might be caught pleasant glimpses of sylvan Dulwich, and the southerly wind came fresh from many a neighbouring copse and meadow, long since forgotten. At that time a young bookseller lived in the Square. His father (a prosperous City tradesman) was the son of Samuel Palmer, a pluralist divine of Sussex, and the grandson of Samuel Palmer, a Wiltshire Rector.1 Although the bookseller could trace his descent still further back, and no doubt was proud to be able to claim kindred with Richard Hooker (not to mention a certain Sir Stephen Fox), Fate had denied him the ancestral orthodoxy. He was, I believe, a Baptist of the strict old school ; and ultimately obeyed a "call" to exhort the members of a Baptist congregation in Walworth. His wife, to whom the slightest expression of his decided will was an unalterable law, had figured as " Lavinia " in a frontispiece designed by Stothard for some work of her father. This literary gentleman had also achieved a book on " Domestic Happiness " ; but, as I have always under stood, he was a domestic martinet of the first water. He had written books, and the books had been printed, so he was the pride of his family, who meekly obeyed his orders, and worshipped him (at a very respectful distance) under the title of " The Author." On the 27th of January 1805 (the bookseller being then thirty years old) there was born to him his first child. This was my father who, 1 An inscription and a coat of arms upon an old brass within the altar rails of Wylye Church, still testify that the Rector's bones lie beneath. He was presented to the living by Archbishop Wake (whose niece he had married), in 1708, three years before his death. B 2 4 THE LIFE OF in due course, was registered at Dr. Williams' library, under his forefathers' Christian name. Like many first-born children he was supposed to be delicate, and was the source of needless anxiety, but he always asserted that he owed his life to the very original gastronomic notions of his young nurse. She found him pining on pap and other baby diet, and boldly substituted more substantial and unusual nutriment. However this may be, he certainly owed to Mary Ward something more than a precocious appetite for salmon. She was one of those faithful and affectionate servants of a race which seems to exist no longer, and although for the most part unlettered she was not only " deeply read " in her Bible, and in Paradise Lost, but was acquainted with other poetry. For instance, when the child was between three and four years old, Mary and he stood watching at a window while the full moon, rising behind the branches of a great elm, cast a maze of shadows on the opposite wall. As the shadows changed, the girl repeated this couplet : — " Fond man ! the vision of a moment made ! Dream of a dream, and shadow of a shade ! " My father never forgot those shadows and often tried to reproduce them with his pencil. There are not many nurse-maids who are capable of intelligently quoting poetry to such purpose as to fix an incident like this permanently in the memory of a baby, and I think it is evident that both must have possessed a rare faculty. My paternal grandfather was a methodical, punctilious, and very simple- minded man, whose words were generally wiser than his actions, the wisdom being otherwise than worldly. He was not without originality, and though his natural bent was evidently towards the exact sciences, he had considerable literary taste. So far from becoming indifferent to the books with which his trade made him familiar, or regarding them as so much merchandize troublesome to dust, he seems to have felt for them a deep regard, unlike that of the mere bibliomaniac, and to have delighted in their constant presence. Inside the last of his little home made pocket-books that exists I find these words (written by my father when he gave it me), "He loved knowledge for its own sake." His letters certainly bear this out. They are feats of legibility, are sensible, and are sometimes seasoned with a little dry humour, but they are not the letters of a man who is likely to be successful in much besides the neat storage of innumerable facts, gathered indiscriminately. Considering his boy rather weakly and the fragility a good reason for deferring his schooling, he determined to lay the foundations of his educa tion himself, in his own. way. Thus at an exceptionally early age, the child was encouraged to fall to upon his Greek and Latin, and was SA ,1/ UE L PA L ME R. 5 allowed at the same time "free pasture through a wide range of English literature" — literature of such variety, that bigotry does not seem to have been one of his father's failings. Every day a portion of the Scriptures was learnt by heart, and every day were repeated with the other lessons, these words : — " Custom is the plague of wise men, ami the idol of fools." This was a rather subversive maxim for the nursery, but one for the learning of which (as I have often he.ird him say) my father had cause to be thankful all the days of his life. When a son of his own was beginning his career he gave him this very similar advice, " If we once " lose sight of goodness as the principal thing we are adrift without an " anchor. If we merely ask ourselves ' What will people say of us V we are " rotten at tlie core." It will be presently seen how thoroughly these precepts were put into practice, even to the verge of fanaticism. The exceptional eagerness my father showed in following his early studies caused the months to pass away very pleasantly ; and from time to time, by way of holiday, he paid visits with his mother to relations at Green wich and Margate ; this last journey being made, I believe, in one of the old "Hoys" owned by a distant kinsman. It was in Margate, perhaps, that his delight in the supernatural had its origin ; weird stories of murder and of unquiet spirits which roamed in some of the ancient houses being common. My father never spoke of his childhood as having been unhappy or dull, but although some young cousins tempted him into a few boyish pranks, it seems to have lacked the boisterous frolic so essential to the well-being of children. It was for the most part a sedentary and preco ciously grave childhood, which proved deleterious to the body, and, for a time, to the development of a healthy mental condition. It was all very well to nestle in a corner with his cat " Watch " and a glass of home made wine, there to pore over the pages of a favourite author, but it was such habits as these that led to his becoming physically unlike the average English boy — small of limb, soft handed, and lacking in activity. They also helped to produce a sensitiveness which he would have been better without, and a strange liking for shedding " delicious tears " at performances on the organ. After the birth of a second son, who afterwards received the smatterings of an artistic education, my father was sent to Merchant Taylors' School — a life for which he had been carefully unfitted. Before he had begun to find his level, and to profit by the inestimable advantages of that well- known process, it was discovered that he had "a taste for art." He tells us that his parents misinterpreted " an instinct of another kind — a passion- " ate love (the expression is not too strong), for the traditions and monu- " ments of the Church ; its cloistered abbeys, cathedrals, and minsters, which 6 THE LIFE OF " I was always imagining and trying to draw ; spoiling much paper with pen- " cils, crayons, and water-colours." This might have been an unfortunate instinct for the elder son of a very earnest Baptist to possess, and it is not surprising that it was at first "misinterpreted." We have my father's authority for the fact that he was what he calls " a free-thinker " at fourteen, and we know that he afterwards became and remained a staunch churchman. What part, however, my grandfather's arguments and in fluence may have played in the growth of his son's religious opinions— whether he opposed them, or simply left them to grow unchecked, I do not know. No one has realized more thoroughly than my father afterwards did the priceless value of a liberal education, and the serious responsibility resting on those who take away the opportunity of acquiring it except for the gravest reasons. "It is too commonly the case," he wrote, " that when my young master prefers scribbling over paper to his Latin and Greek, he is supposed at once to have a 'taste for painting.' " In my father's instance, the result did not seem to justify the step of removing him from school. He began his artistic studies heartily, but for want of proper teaching they were altogether misdirected. Instead of being made to attack the all-important rudiments of draughtsmanship and anatomy (a discipline of which he afterwards well knew the value) he was allowed to copy laboriously, prints of the Campo Santo frescoes, engravings of " botanical minutiae," and even architectural drawings. When he was nearly thirteen years old these ill-advised attempts were interrupted by his first great trouble. He was paying a visit to his grand father " The Author " early in the year when he was told that his mother was dead. He had dearly loved her, for he says " she was the counterpart of her who has charmed us all in Cowper's verse," and the news " pierced him like a sharp sword." It is doubtful whether he recovered the shock for many years, and to this cause may be partly attributed a morbid and melancholy tendency of mind which grew upon him to no small extent, although its attacks were fortunately intermittent. His capability of suffer ing in this and other calamities cannot be gauged by his age, or by the usual standard of susceptibility, but only by his own abnormally sensitive temperament ; and it will be seen, by and bye, how terrible a scourge that temperament became. Father and son were now thrown more together, and they turned for their recreation to the diligent study of English literature. The bookseller, in spite of his avowed contempt for custom was, as I have said, a punctilious man, and he loved to do everything with the orderly deliberation that some times degenerates into an iron routine. He made himself little vellum- covered memorandum-books just the size of his waistcoat pocket, and filled SAMUEL PALMER. 7 them with elaborately written notes, ranging from the solution of an algebraical problem, to a quotation from some favourite poet or divine. If the daily walk with his son proved wearisome or unattractive, out amti the little book to shorten the homeward journey. The artistic studies were still continued to small purpose, but as it had been definitely decided that the boy should become a painter he received some lessons from a Mr. Wate ; an obscure artist, but a man whose sterling and unostentatious character, together with his methodical habits, impressed his pupil not a little. Good news greeted tlie student not as he says himself on his fourteenth birthday, but just after it, and this was the letter he received. " Mr. Young presents compliments to Mr. Palmer informing [him] that " Mr. Wilkinson of No. 4 Beaumont Street, Marylebone has purchased his " picture No. 169 marked at 7 guineas, and Mr. Wilkinson wishes to see Mr. " Palmer, being disposed from the specimen he has seen of his abilities, to " give him further encouragement. British Gallery, Pall Mall. February 2, " 181 9." 1 In the same year he was represented at the Royal Academy by three subjects.2 It is less remarkable that so young a tyro should have tried to grapple with the difficulties of painting from nature and the dif ficulties of design, than that he should have ventured to send his first attempts to the leading exhibitions of the day, with encouraging results. Perhaps we may conclude that crude as these works were, they were not without sterling qualities which the kindly Academical veterans detected. But the standard of those days was, of course, quite a different thing from that of the present time. The Academy exhibition of 1819 was the first my father had seen, and he was at once deeply impressed by Turner's Orange Merchantman. This was the origin of his admiration for the great painter ; and he says that afterwards, when " Mr. George Cooke the engraver would sometimes drop " in of an evening for a talk about art, the engravings of the brothers from " Turner formed part of the pabulum of my admiration — lunacy I may " almost say, before the popular expositors of that wonderful man were " born ..." The frame of mind which forced the lad of fourteen to stop before the Orange Merchantman and to carry away with him such a vivid impression of that one picture was probably due partly to the kind of literature in which he had enjoyed " free pasture," and partly to the same predisposition which fixed the moon-cast shadows in his memory. Faculties which at that age are generally rudimentary appear to have been already fairly developed. 1 This picture was either Bridge scene, composition, or Landscape, composition. " 257. Landscape with ruins ; 259. Cottage scene. Banks of the Thames, Battersea. 414. A study. Z1-, %/ THE LIFE OF In 1820 he was again successful in getting a picture accepted at the Academy, and we find from the index of the catalogue that the family had migrated to No. 10, Broad Street, Bloomsbury. The boy began now to flounder into the deep waters of his profession ; but he was not altogether without encouragement. It was long before the days of the westward tide which left the stone stairs and lofty rooms of Newman Street high and dry on the shores of unfashionable life, and in that street dwelt Stothard, who must have known something of the family as he had drawn my grandmother. From Stothard plenty of good advice was forthcoming, together with occasional tickets of admission to the lectures at the Royal Academy, where Flaxman then discoursed on sculpture. But my father was without the healthy emulation of the schools, where he might have profited by seeing the workmanship of those more experienced than himself. So, at a time when he should have contented himself with the alphabet of art, he was full of theories and speculations more suitable to the most learned professors ; and full also of boyish certainty about things of which he knew very little. As far as art was concerned he continued to misuse his days, but at the same time, be it remembered, to exercise very diligently his mental faculties, till he became acquainted with Mr. John Linnell, who was his senior by twelve years, and in full career as a well-known artist. The healthy influence of this remarkable man came just at the right moment, and I shall presently have to allude to it more particularly. According to Mr. Richmond the acquaintance arose through Mr. Linnell admiring some of my father's small sepia landscapes, and it soon grew into intimacy. The new friend introduced the student to John Varley and Mulready ; and just as Turner's work had appealed to one peculiarity of that student's mind Mulready's thoroughness and love of conscientiousness appealed to a second. As my father wrote afterwards, Mulready "was one of the few who realized Lavater's advice to devote ourselves to each new undertaking as if it were our test — our first work and our last." Mulready's maxims were much to the mind of a youth who, in spite of his admiration for Turner, was now struggling to imitate the very texture of the marble statues at the British Museum ; and we shall find that, in after years, my father handed them on in his own way by harping on the importance of Patience, Elements, and Accuracy. He was now about to enter upon the first of the five eras into which his career naturally divides, by falling under a peculiar influence which seemed to him almost supernatural. , \ My uncle Mr. John Linnell Junr., writing to me touching an erroneous date in Gilchrist's Life of Blake, says that his father " first became ac- " quainted with William Blake when he (J. L., Senr.) was living in Rathbone " Place (1818) to whom he paid a visit with the younger Mr. Cumberland- SAMUEL PALMER. 9 ' Blake lived then in South Molton Street, Oxford Street (2nd floor), and " J. L. employed him to help him with the engraving of his portrait of Mr. " Upton, a Baptist preacher. This is stated thus in his autobiography by " J. L., and the first entry referring to Blake in J. L.'s Journal is dated "June 24, 1818, when he took Blake the picture of Mr. Upton and the "copper plate to begin the engraving upon.'' This was the beginning of an intimate friendship between Blake and Mr. Linnell Senr., and it was through the latter that, six years later, my father became himself intimate with Blake, though he had doubtless known his works for some time. That these works were inspired by the spirit of the purest and noblest art and were worthy to be ranked with the greatest works of the greatest masters he soon became convinced, and neither he nor Mr. Linnell appeared to see in them any other peculiarity. The first records of my father s acquaintance with Blake occur in 1824, and that the two friends visited the Academy exhibition of that year to gether seems probable from a passage in Gilchrist's Life : " Mr. Palmer " well remembers a visit to the Academy in Blake's company, during which " the latter pointed to a picture near the ceiling by Wainwright, and spoke of " it as ' very fine.' . . . ' While so many moments worthy to remain are " fled,' writes Mr. Palmer to me, 'the caprice of memory presents me with " the image of Blake looking up at Wainwright's picture ; Blake in his plain " black suit and rather broad-brimmed, but not Quakerish hat, standing so " quietly among all the dressed-up, rustling, swelling people, and myself " thinking " How little you know who is among you.' " According to Gil christ, this picture was a scene from Walton's Angler, and upon referring to the Academy catalogue we find it entered thus. "No. 268 The Milk maid's Song, T. G. WainwTight, H. ' Come live with me and be my love.' From The Compleat Angler. Isaac Walton and Venator listening.' " Now my father more than once described a certain interview with Blake at Fountain Court as a first interview ; but no doubt through his having mislaid and forgotten the memoranda he made at the time his descriptions differ. I have been fortunate in finding among his papers the very book in which the notes (together with some others relating to Blake) were entered, and, assuming that the incident of the picture is correctly related, we are con fronted with a difficulty on account of the date assigned to the first interview. These notes, however, being evidently written very near the time of the occurrences with which they deal are more likely to be accurate than my father's recollections many years afterwards. They open as follows : — " On Saturday, 9th October, 1824, Mr. Linnell called and went with me " to Mr. Blake. We found him lame in bed, of a scalded foot (or leg). " There, not inactive, though sixty-seven years old, but hard-working on a bed " covered with books sat he up like one of the Antique patriarchs, or a io /' THE LIFE OF " dying Michael Angelo. Thus and there was he making in the leaves of a "great book (folio) the sublimest designs from his (not superior) Dante. " He said he began them with fear and trembling. I said ' O ! I have "enough of fear and trembling.' 'Then,' said he, 'you'll do.' He de- " signed them (ioo I think) during a fortnight's illness in bed ! And " there, first, with fearfulness (which had been the more, but that his designs " from Dante had wound me up to forget myself), did I show him some of " my first essays in design ; and the sweet encouragement he gave me (for " Christ blessed little children) did not tend basely to presumption and " idleness, but made me work harder and better that afternoon and night. " And, after visiting him, the scene recurs to me afterwards in a kind of " vision ; and in this most false, corrupt, and genteelly stupid town my " spirit sees his dwelling (the Chariot of the sun), as it were an island in the " midst of the sea— such a place is it for primitive grandeur, whether in the " persons of Mr. and Mrs. Blake, or in the things hanging on the " walls. . . ." The authority of the Academy catalogue for 1824 on the one hand, and that of my father's notes on the other leave no way of reconciling the conflicting dates, except by assuming that either he or Gilchrist was in error as to the title of Wainwright's picture, and that it was one of those exhibited by that notorious and accomplished criminal in 1825. This is the more probable because we find that it was not till October 9, 1824, that my father showed Blake some of his " first essays in design," whereas there were two works of his x hanging in the very exhibition Gilchrist refers to — works which he would not be likely to refrain from bringing under his companion's notice. I must return to the time preceding these notable events in my father's life, reminding the reader once more that (as he himself freely acknow ledged) his early professional career, as far as technical training went, was very ill-advised. It seems that his artistic feeling and taste were at first strong and acute, then decadent, and then, temporarily, almost extinguished ; a state of things probably caused chiefly by this misdirected practice. But all this time there was a steady intellectual advance— the steady influence of the best literature upon a mind naturally susceptible to all good influences, whether moral or poetic. The first crop may have failed, but the soil was mellowing. Just at the time when a dangerous propensity might have arisen to wander off on bye roads leading to idleness or pleasant dilettantism there came upon the scene the decided, uncompromising character of John Linnell— a courageous artist who had fought many a tough battle, and 1 504. Landscape Twilight; and 706. Study of a Head. SAMUEL PALMER. n who knew the dispositions and strength of the enemy, lie w.ns remarkable for individuality; and happily, he was full of admiration lor some of the old giants who tower above all the painters of their own and alter times. " Look at Albert Durer," he said ; and he said it so imperatively that the words are quoted more than once in my father's early memoranda. He urged the study of Michael Angelo and Honasoni — the study of the figure, and particularly of Antique sculpture. His twelve years of seniority went for a good deal, but not for more than his great strength of character and originality. All who knew John Linnell intimately must admit that he belonged to the order of men who, if they fail with one weapon or with many, coolly and doggedly fight on to victory. His convictions were strong, deeply rooted, and, as might have been expected from an entirely self-made man, accompanied by a great intolerance of any convictions of a contrary kind. He was by nature so painstaking and so extremely in dustrious that it needed not the precepts of his friend and master Mulready to turn him towards an honest and sterling professional ideal. Of this ideal as it existed then some notion may be gathered from his early engravings in line and mezzotint, after his own pictures ; particularly ' the fine plate after his portrait of John Martin, the stern old Keppel Street Pastor.1 A reverent regard for truth is shown in every touch, and those essential characteristics which distinguished the sitter from his fellow-men are evidently grasped intuitively, and made the most of. At the time of his first acquaintance with my father Mr. Linnell was living at Cirencester Place, Fitzroy Square, in the midst of a career equally remarkable for determined industry, indomitable energy, and for eccentricity. He was to be found at one time elaborating with exquisite delicacy of touch the dainty ivory miniatures in which connoisseurs professed to see qualities worthy of some of the Old Masters ; at another taking a turn with his great, bony hands at his own flour-mill and kneading- trough, kept going to supply the appetites of a family which repudiated baker's bread. He would turn from the labour of love and enthusiasm on his excellent engravings to receive some fashionable or distinguished sitter ; and then, perhaps, to give a lesson to a pupil, in whose plethora of accomplishments, drawing had to be included. Moreover, by the irony of Fate, he was then practising as an " unremunerative luxury " that branch of art by which he afterwards gained renown and wealth. He had, in a 1 It used to be a favourite story with my father that this old gentleman was once invited to a grand dinner given in his honour by some rich member of his flock, who held him in great awe and esteem. When the guests were assembled at the table, and he was pressed to partake of the choicest, he cast his eyes around him with these words : — "There is nothing here that I can eat." Consternation followed, and assiduous inquiries as to what could be got for him. "Bring me," he said, "an onion, and a pot of porter." 12 THE LIFE OF pre-eminent degree, the knack of turning everything— his friendships, his natural gifts, and his opportunities, to the greatest possible advantage ; while his stern self-denial, and contempt for conventionalities of all kinds, made it a greater pleasure to save and to hoard up his savings than to spend them on personal comfort and personal appearance. Now it was only natural that such a man as this with his extraordinary versatility, vitality, energy, and executive powers, together with his eminent friends, and his fine old books, should attract a student much younger than himself, who was possessed of some characteristics com plementary to his own ; and, having attracted him, it was also natural that he should give him an impulse in a right direction. But before ascertain ing by means of my father's written records what this impulse was like we should remind ourselves that the phraseology of these records will al together mislead us if we attempt to compare it with that used by any average man. My father's reverence for anything that even distantly approached greatness of character was as exceptional as his own self- abasement ; and, throughout his life, his tendency was always to take people at their own valuation of themselves, and sometimes even above it. He inherited from his father the habit of committing to paper whatever he considered worth remembering, and he had formed another habit of carefully writing down the exact nature of any difficulty he encountered, because, in doing so, he found that the solution often suggested itself. More than twenty of the large, clasped pocket-books in which these memoranda were made have been preserved, and they also contain so many sketches, poems, essays, and columns of accounts, that the series, as far as it goes, forms a kind of skeleton autobiography. Among the earliest of these memoranda are the following : — "¦November, 1822 to June 9, 1824. — Now it is twenty months since you 'began to draw. Your second trial begins. Make a new experiment. " Draw near to Christ, and see what is to be done with Him to back you. " Your indolent moments rise up, each as a devil and as a thorn at the " quick. Keep company with the friends of Publicans and sinners, and " see if, in such society, you are not ashamed to be idle. Ask Christ to " manifest to you these things ; Christ looking upon Peter (called Repentance) " and Peter's countenance. Christ's promise to the dying thief— the looks " of both. Christ leading His blessed to fountains of living waters (which " being the union of all vision, should be done as the artist's Prince) ; "Jesus weeping at Lazarus' tomb. The three first are the chief, and "are almost unpaintable— quite, without Christ. Lay up, silently and " patiently, materials for them in your sketch-book, and copy the prints to " learn such nicety in pen sketching, or rather, making careful studies, as " may enable you to give the expressions. But smaller subjects of separate SAMUEL PALMER. ,, " glories of Heaven might be tried— hymns sung among the hills of Paradise "at eventide; ... a martyr, having painted his murder, laughing, or " rather smiling at his torments. A family met in Heaven . . . ." "January 2nd [1825].— Now is begun a new year. Here I pause to " look back on the time between this and about the 15th of last July. Then " I laid by the [Holy] Family in much distress, anxiety, and fear ; which " had plunged me into despair but for God's mercy, tlirough which and " which alone it was that despondency not for one moment slackened my " sinews ; but rather, distress (being blessed) was to me a great arousement ; " quickly goading me to deep humbleness, eager, restless inquiry, and " diligent work. I then sought Christ's help, the giver of all good talents " whether acknowledged or not, and had I gone on to seek Him as I " ought, I had found His name to me as a civet-box and sweeter than all " perfume. Notwithstanding, as it was, I think (by Him alone) I improved I " more since I resolved to depend on Him till now, than in the same time " ever before ; and have felt much more assistance and consolation. For " very soon after my deep humblement and distress, I resumed and finished " my Twilight, and quickly took up my Joseph's Dream, and sketched in " my new sketch-book. Mr. L. [Linnell] called, and looking at my Joseph, " sepias, and sketch-books, did give me indeed sweet encouragement. Soon, " by his desire, I went with him to Mr. B. [Blake], who also, on seeing my " things, gave me above my hope, over-much praise ; and these praises from " equally valued judgements did (God overruling) not in the least tend to " presumption and idleness, and but little to pride ; for knowing my own " stupidness (but not alas, to its full) I gave back the praise to God who " kindly sent it, and had granted to me desponding, that at eventide it " should be light . . . ." In another of these note-books (including a period from November 1823 to July 1824) this is the first noteworthy entry: — "N.B. in my " attempts to copy the Antique statues to try and draw most severely, and " to cry out for more and more form ; and then I shall find in the Antique " more than I can copy, if I look and look and pry into it earnestly for " form. I shall not be easy till I have drawn one Antique statue most "severely. I cannot execute at all. The least bit of natural scenery " reflected from one of my spectacle-glasses laughs me to scorn, and hisses " at me. I feel, ten minutes a day, the most ardent love for art, and spend " the rest of my time in stupid apathy, negligence, ignorance, and restless " despondency ; without any of those delicious visions which are the only "joys of my life— such as Christ at Emmaus; the repenting thief on " the cross ; the promise to Abraham ; and secondary visions of the ages " of chivalry, which are toned down with deep gold to distinguish them " from the flashy, distracted present." 14 THE LIFE OF . ^ But in following Mr. Linnell's advice to study the antique, my fathei had pried too closely; and hence (as we gather from his subsequent statement) his " sedulous efforts to render the marbles exactly, even to their granulation," led him " too much aside from the study of organization and structure." Nevertheless, by this kind of discipline, he acquired the invaluable habit of looking at things with concentrated attention, and with certain definite reasons for that attention. He writes : — " Look for Van Leydenish qualities in real landscape, and look hard, long and continually. Look for picturesque combinations of buildings, and elegant spires and turrets for backgrounds." 1 At the end of a year of close study and investigation, that was now applied to better purpose than before, he briefly sums up his artistic career as follows : — " As it seems reasonable to divide the soul's journey into stages and " starting-points, and to stop and look back at certain intervals, and at " each fresh stage to go back to the primitive and infantine feeling with " which we set out ; and to lay in such a store of humility, simple anxiety " to get on, and diligence in the great, nay stupendous pursuit of grand " art as may stand us in stead for a year's journey or so, I divide my life " with respect to art into two parts. First, my very early years, in which " I distinctly remember that I felt the finest scenery and the country in " general with a very strong and pure feeling ; so that had I then seen the '¦' works of the very ancient Italian and German masters I should have ad- " mired and imitated them, and wondered what the moderns could mean " by what they call their ' effects.' Then, when I gradually learnt arithmetic " and grammar, my feeling and taste left me, but I was not then completely " spoilt for art. But when I had learned to paint a little, by the time I had " practised for about five years I entirely lost all feeling for art, nor did I " see the greatest beauties of even the Dutch Masters, Cuyp, Ruysdael &c. ; "so that I not only learnt nothing in this space of time that related to " high art, but I was nearly disqualified from ever learning to paint. But it " pleased God to send Mr. Linnell as a good angel from Heaven to pluck " me from the pit of modern art ; and after struggling to get out for the " space of a year and a half, I have just enough cleared my eyes from the " slime of the pit to see what a miserable state I am now in. ... I have " now made my first struggle — alas, with how little success. I shall now " begin a new sketch-book, and I hope, try to work with a child's simple " feeling and with the industry of humility. ..." 1 In the same volume as this, there is a rough pen and ink sketch, apparently intended for St. Christopher bearing the sacred Child ; and beneath it is written, " My first attempt at figure-designing, 1823." SAMUEL PALMER. 15 Among many visits to the Dulwich gallery at this time of great impressi bility, one is recorded as having been made in Mr. Linnell's company. "Memoranda, day after going to Dulwich. Cox is pretty -is sweet, "but not grand, not profound. Carefully avoid getting into that style " which is elegant and beautiful but too light and superficial ; not learned " enough— like Barret. He has a beautiful sentiment and it is derived " from Nature ; but Nature has properties which lie still deeper, and when " they are brought out the picture must be most elaborate and full of " matter even if only one object be represented, yet it will be most simple " of style, and be what would have pleased men in the early ages, when " poetry was at its acme, and yet men lived in a simple, pastoral way. " Girtin's twilight, beautiful, but did he know the grand old men ? Let " me remember always, and may I not slumber in the possession of it, Mr. " Linnell's injunction (delightful in the performance), ' Look at Albert " Diirer.' In what a simple way Landscape impressed the mind of Raffaelle ; " yet his little bits make me despair. " How superior is Mr. Linnell's style of colouring to that of any other " modern landscape painter, and yet not half so captivating to an ignorant " eye as others. " Look at Mr. Blake's way of relieving objects, and at his colour. "The copy of Leonardo da Vinci at Dulwich is merely a head and " shoulders. How amazingly superior it is in style to any portrait there. " The tone of the flat blueish sky is wonderful, though it is nothing " of itself. It is the colour of the soul, not vulgar paint. Ruysdael, " Hobbema, Paul Potter, and Cuyp — how intense, how pure, how profound, " how wonderful ! " After a singularly comprehensive list of " fine things " seen during this journey to Dulwich, once again comes — "Look at Albert Diirer." The writer is evidently entering that early stage of discovery when the mind, naturally short-sighted, takes up for the first time the telescope of knowledge. A few months later, the following entries were made in the new sketch book just referred to. After describing Michael Angelo as " The Salt of Art," and speaking enthusiastically of the old German and Italian Masters as compared with the " Venetian Heresy," the writer continues : — " I sat " down with Mr. Blake's Thornton's Virgil woodcuts before me, thinking to " give to their merits my feeble testimony. I happened first to think of " their sentiment. They are visions of little dells, and nooks, and corners " of Paradise ; models of the exquisitest pitch of intense poetry. I thought " of their light and shade, and looking upon them I found no word to " describe it. Intense depth, solemnity, and vivid brilliancy only coldly " and partially describe them. There is in all such a mystic and dreamy 16 THE LIFE OF " glimmer as penetrates and kindles the inmost soul, and gives complete " and unreserved delight, unlike the gaudy daylight of this world. They " are like all that wonderful artist's works the drawing aside of the fleshly " curtain, and the glimpse which all the most holy, studious saints and " sages have enjoyed, of that rest which remaineth to the people of God. " The figures of Mr. Blake have that intense, soul-evidencing attitude " and action, and that elastic, nervous spring which belongs to uncaged " immortal spirits . . . Excess is the essential vivifying spirit, vital spark, " embalming spice . . of the finest art. Be ever saying to yourself " ' Labour after the excess of excellence ' . . . There are many mediums -" in the means — none, O ! not a jot, not a shadow of a jot, in the end of " great art. In a picture whose merit is to be excessively brilliant, it can't " be too brilliant ; but individual tints may be too brilliant. . . . We must " not begin with medium, but think always on excess, and only use medium " to make excess more abundantly excessive. ... I wras looking with " Mr. L : [Linnell] at one of Bonasoni's emblems, a rope-dancer balancing " himself with this motto, In medio est salus. ' Yes,' said he emphati- " cally, ' for a rope-dancer ; but the rope-dancer only keeps the middle " that he may be not a middling, but an excessive fine performer. . . .'" " Well would it be, if those who hope at last to produce works of " exquisitest beauty were constantly haunted, . . . urged, and lashed by " this truth, that the more quietly they take things now, the more pleasures " they allow themselves, the less distressful the anxiety of weighing but a " little too light in the balances, the less rigidly sublime the ideal goal, by " so much will be the vale of life the gloomier — the murkier the sunset " with the thickening horrors of a stormy night. Sometimes for weeks " and months together, a kindly severe spirit says to me on waking in the "morning the name of some great painter, and distresses me with the " fear of coming short at last ; and I think it is then I do most good." His creed, he says, must not be judged by his work in 1825, but by his present sayings : — " Though I hope," he continues, " we shall all be severe " outlinists, I hope our styles of outline may all be different as the design " of Michael Angelo from his equal, Blake, and the outline of Albert " Diirer from that of Andrea Mantegna. VThere is no line in nature, ^ " though excessive sharpness. "Nature is not at all the standard of art, but " art is the standard of nature. The visions of the soul, being perfect, " are the only true standard by which nature must be tried. The cor- " poreal executive is no good thing to the painter, but a bane. In pro- " portion as we enjoy and improve in imaginative art we shall love the " material works of God more and more, j Sometimes landscape is seen " as a vision, and then seems as fine as art ; but this is seldom, and " bits of nature are generally much improved by being received into the SAMUEL PALMER. n "soul, when she thinks on such supernatural works as Mr. Linnell's picture "by Lucas Van Leyden. . . . Often, and I think generally, at Dulwich, " the distant hills seem the most powerful objects in colour, and clear force "of line: 'we are not troubled with aerial perspective in the valley of " vision. . . . Genius is the unreserved devotion of the whole soul to the " divine, poetic arts, and through them to God ; deeming all else, even | " to our daily bread, only valuable as it helps us to unveil the heavenly) " face of Beauty. ..." Following several rather lugubrious unfinished poems in the note-books, with imagery far superior to the unmusical diction and halting metre, there comes a copy of a very characteristic business letter: — "Samuel Palmer, " having completed Mr. Bennett's very kind order, begs to state that the " pictures and drawings now delivered, being somewhat different in style " from those he used to paint when Mr. Bennett gave the commission, he " shall not feel the least reluctance to taking back any of this set that Mr. " Bennett may disapprove. S. P. will be happy to. listen to any suggestion " from Mr. Bennett, towards the improvement of this set of pictures and " drawings."1 After another interval of poetry, the writer adds : — " It was given me " this morning (16th October, 1825), to see that I had done wrong in " seeking for Mr. Bennett's pictures, visions more consonant with common " nature than those I received, at my first regeneration, from the Lord. I " will no more, by God's grace, seek to moderate for the sake of pleasing "men . . " Further on he continues : — " The artist who knows propriety " will not cringe or apologize when the eye of judgement is fixed upon his " work. And the artist who knows art, ere he bring his work forward to the " envious world, or hope for the admiration of the few select discemers, will •• elaborate it to his utmost thought ; if indeed, material tablet can receive " the perfect tracings of celestial beauty . . ." It is not easy to find among the works of this period which have survived instances of the moderation which Mr. Bennett's " order " seems, for the time being, to have produced, or of work which the world would be likely to covet. In all is excess ; in many, " excess more abundantly exces- 1 These are entered as follows : — Windsor . . Twilight .... ... Scene from Kent Rustic Scene . . . Harvest Moon . . 6 Drawings . . H £ s. it. 5 5 0 3, ,3 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 1 10 0 31 19 0 , 18 THE LIFE OF sive," but it is just this very quality that gives them their undoubted hold upon the minds of "the few select discerners" who can manage to under stand them. The execution, as in Blake's Pastorals, is often primitive, the design archaic and simple ; but the result is so clearly the offspring of a mind swayed almost solely by poetical and imaginative faculties of uncom mon development, that the technical blunders, and the anomalies, and the absurdities, find forgiveness with those who have mastered at all events the alphabet of this strange unwritten language. Still turning the leaves of the same volume from which I have quoted, we arrive at a list of subjects taken from the books of Ruth, Daniel; and Jonah, which it was evidently the writer's intention to attempt ; and we find also a prayer that God might prosper him in painting his " visions " of the story of Ruth and Naomi : — "Young as I am," he continues, "I know — I " am certain and positive that God answers the prayers of them that believe, " and hope in His mercy. I sometimes doubt this through the temptation " of the Devil, and while I doubt I am miserable ; but when my eyes are " open again, I see what God has done to me, and I now tell you, I know- " that my Redeemer liveth." Pages of description would not give so good an idea of the aspect of my father's mind at this time as the passages I have quoted. I have quoted them reluctantly ; firstly, because they were never intended to be seen ; and secondly, because they show a mental condition which, in many respects, is uninviting. It is a condition full of danger, and neither suffi ciently masculine nor sufficiently reticent. It is, however, not without hope, and everything depends on the actions which next follow — on the strength of character available to bolt the flour from the bran. As regards external influences, on the one hand there was the out spoken, practical counsel of John Linnell, enforced by the examples of such splendid and typical energizers as himself and Mulready ; and on the other hand was the mystic and parabolic teaching of old, neglected William Blake, driven home by what seemed an unaccountable force which enslaved those who were willing to give themselves up. Deeper in the young student's mind than either of these influences had yet penetrated, there were a few passionate longings and loves,1 and an ideal of which its owner, though conscious of its presence, could hardly have given a coher ent explanation. To foster these there was, so to speak, the exotic 1 He writes thus to Mr. Valpy, June 23, 1880, "I can remember nothing which so "agreeably disturbed my male lethargy, except perhaps my first reading of Fletcher's " Faithful Shepherdess. But when there I found, in black and white, all my dearest "landscape longings embodied, my poor mind kicked out and turned two or three " somersaults. . . ." SAMUEL PALMER. , ly atmosphere of a secluded and peculiar home life. In an ordinary family, or in an ordinary school or college career, all these strange doings and opinions would have been modified. They would, to a great extent, have simply died out, if they had come into existence at all, as we feel a solemn or pathetic impression die out before an hour or so of bustling, business activity, or the uncongenial remarks of a hostile critic. The counsel of Mr. Linnell, we must remember, was in some particulars rather supplemental than antagonistic to that of Blake ; and it is probable that the young man who was now courting the society of these two very dissimilar men had qualifications which enabled him to reconcile many of their opinions. I think it is easy to see the influence of Blake and his works in much that I have quoted. Art is described as the standard of nature; the " visions of the soul " as perfect, and therefore " the only true standard by which nature must be tried." " Excess " is " the essential spirit ... of the finest art." " Delicious visions " are sometimes granted, sometimes with held, and much prayer is made that the visionary may be prospered in painting them. Some of these seem to have been so vivid that they led to more than the crude sketches in the pocket-books, and at last (as I shall show), to a complete change in the course of my father's career. There is a peculiarity to be found in most of these early note-books of his which in some cases would have augured ill for the future success of a young man. The poems and essays are seldom completed. The begin nings of all of them are drafted, revised, elaborately re-revised ; and at each stage there is a neat elaboration which invariably changes, sooner or later, to untidy scribbling. But I take it that this simply showed the result of a series of impulsive struggles towards an ideal which was almost out or reach, rather than the descent of apathy, or the failure of energy. It is the action of a mind not yet broken to the determined fight with the difficulties of real life, and may be likened to the plunges of a colt before he has learned to economize his strength, and to throw his weight steadily against the collar.1 Returning for a moment to a topic upon which I have touched already, and referring to the short autobiography of my father which was published in 1872, we find these words, "... but I was unacquainted with artists, "and time was misused until my introduction to Mr. Linnell, who took a " very kind interest in my improvement, and advised me at once to begin a " course of figure-drawing. . . ." Now whether it was these words them- 1 Real eccentricity of a decided type is to be found in one of these volumes, in the guise of a treatise on " Household Government." This is a collection of masterful opinions on the enforcement of male authority ; and the ideal is a domestic martinet, who rules an utterly impossible household in an utterly impossible way. 20 THE LIFE OF selves, or their interpretation by the occult science of criticism, which led to the making up of a fiction touching the relations of the two artists, it is hard to say, but after my father's death it was asserted that: — "Samuel Palmer . . . was a veteran water-colour painter of the school of Blake and Linnell, from each of whom he borrowed much that made him singular among his fellows." Wherever "the school of Blake " may have flourished, and apart from the difficulty in imagining a " school of Blake and Linnell," it seems to me that this criticism was misleading. It would easily lead to the conclusion that my father was a copyist, and successful as an artist only because he was so. I must admit that the few autobiographical words I have quoted do not convey an adequate idea of the kind and invaluable help and encouragement my father received at his friend's hands ; and I have taken pains to give such extracts from his writings as will place that matter beyond a doubt. But in reading these extracts, it is essential to bear in mind what I have said about his unusual reverence for anything at all approaching greatness of character ; and also not only that his gratitude was far more easily moved than is usual, but that he habitually expressed it in somewhat profuse terms. He speaks of Mr. Linnell as having been sent to him by God as " a good angel from heaven," and on one occasion he writes to the angel thus : — " Those glorious round clouds which you paint, I do think inimitably, are alone an example how the elements of nature can be transmuted into the pure gold of art." I must admit that I possess one little picture of my father's, painted about this time, the sky of which is very suggestive of Mr. Linnell's manner, and even of his colour ; and further, that another picture known as The Bright Cloud may suggest the same painter in the treatment of the sky. Nevertheless, judging by the hundreds of other examples I have of my father's work, executed before and since he became acquainted with Mr. Linnell — judging by the most characteristic of his works of any period, it is possible to maintain that what made him " singular among his fellows " (that is to say the best of his etchings and water-colours), was not borrowed from anybody, but was essentially his own. Further, that his art is particularly remarkable for belonging to no school ; and that its " pictorial genealogy " cannot easily be traced through any other artist. That the genealogy of a certain por tion of his early works can be traced through one or two of the Old Masters and through Blake is very true. Even in the two pictures I have quoted as undoubtedly savouring of Linnell, there is much that is thoroughly original in conception, sentiment, and execution. The sympathies, and I think I may say the ideals, of the two artists were as totally distinct as their characters, and although my father was beholden to his senior for some technical instruction in oil-painting, besides his counsel and encouragement, it was not long before (disregarding Mr. SAMUEL PALMER. 21 Linnell's definite advice) he struck into a course of practice as entirely in dependent as his course of thought. Fxcept that both were diligent students of nature, and (each after his own manner, and in his own time) full of vigorous industry, I, who knew them both so intimately, find it diffi cult to imagine two men mote unlike and even antagonistic. It was this dissimilarity that made their intercourse, as Mr. Richmond says it was, mutually beneficial. If it could be proved that Samuel Palmer became John Linnell's copyist, and drew from that source his inspiration and technique, the whole story of his life, his ideals, and his struggle to realize them, together with half his artistic memoranda, would have to be thrown aside in a heap, as a shameless and fatuous series of falsehoods. I think we may liken my father's acquaintance with Mr. Linnell to a favourable breeze filling the canvas of some craft carried out of her course by contrary winds, and then becalmed ; but the acquaintance with Blake may be compared with the first haven, after a voyage full of doubt, and danger, and delay. Long after Blake (as my father put it) "was taken away from the evil to come" and his body had been huddled into a " common grave " at Bunhill Fields, his disciple wrote of him as " The Maker, the Inventor, one of the few in any age," and described him as a fitting companion for Dante and Michael Angelo — the language of a man who knew the value of the comparison he was making. None of the young artists who also fell, one by one, under Blake's influence would have challenged the opinion, and the only survivor of them all (a man whose whole life has been spent in intercourse with persons of the greatest eminence) emphatically endorses it. Yet the influence was that of a man who lived in " comparative neglect and noble poverty," who worked with out ceasing to maintain himself and his wife in severe frugality, and whose very sanity has been doubted, denied, and defended so often, that his name has become a kind of artoticSWbbolgth. This last vexed question has a good deal of interest for one who has studied my father's life — perhaps the staunchest and most affectionate of all Blake's followers ; and the interest is increased when we find that the influence over those followers was to some extent personal ; that they derived a certain part of their reverence and admiration from an intimate personal intercourse. It might be suggested that " birds of a feather flock together," and that a man's disciples, themselves not without eccentricity and full of the rash enthusiasm of youth are not the jury before whom to try him. But we find not only that these were all un doubtedly sane men intellectually above the average, and men who, for the most part, made their mark in after years, but that, in every case, the allegiance survived their youth, and lasted in undiminished strength to the THE LIFE OF end of their days. Even so practical and wary a veteran as John Linnell, was held in the same bonds. An insane man of any ordinary type would not have been likely to become the cynosure of such as these. He would not be described by fairly competent judges as possessing " great powers of argument," a kindly and equable disposition, and as having a cease less pleasure in his work. We hear nothing, even from unbelievers in Blake's sanity,1 of periods of moroseness, of idleness, of physical violence, or of melancholy. With one singular exception, I believe all have been obliged to admit that his life was a cheerful, consistent, industrious, and self-denying life. With none of the advantages of education, or of the hard polish imparted by friction with society, he had sufficient natural ability to accomplish much that has been handed down to us with a respect we are compelled to share. The bluntest accusation of insanity with which Blake's admirers ever had to deal is an assertion made by Doctor Richardson in an essay on hallucinations, which was quoted in a paper in The Cornhill Magazine of August 1875, and it culminates in these words "... he became actually insane, and remained in an asylum for thirty years." 2 This fiction was met by an emphatic denial from three of Blake's personal friends, 1 These unbelievers will be pleased to hear that my father was once supposed to be of unsound mind himself, and that by his own house-maid. He was in the habit of soliloquizing and of repeating fragments of his favourite poets. The girl's former master had also soliloquized, but had ended his career in a lunatic asylum. Naturally, therefore, after the first day or two in her new place, she bewailed her fate to her fellow servant, as of one destined to enter the service of gentlemen who were "queer in their heads." I think this was the same girl who expressed her astonishment that her master should have two frames of tailor's patterns hanging up in the drawing-room, the "patterns" being Blake's Pastorals. " The passage referred to is as follows : — " There can be no doubt that some persons ' ' possess the power of forming mental pictures so perfect as to serve all the purposes of "objective realities .... The same faculty is exercised by the artist who draws either "from memory or by a sort of creative talent which enables him to conceive suitable ' ' forms or attitudes, and copy them as though the conceptions were realities. Dr. ' ' Richardson, in an interesting essay on hallucinations, mentions a singular illustration ot "this faculty in the case of Wm. Blake. This artist once 'produced three hundred ' ' portraits from his own hand in one year. ' When asked on what this peculiar power of " rapid work depended, he answered, ' " that when a sitter came to him, he looked at him ' ' attentively for half-an-hour, sketching from time to time on the canvas ; then he put ' ' away the canvas and took another sitter. When he wished to resume the first portrait, " he said, I took the man, and put him in the chair, where I saw him as distinctly as if "he had been before me in his own proper person. When I looked at the chair, I saw " the man." ' It may be well to mention that the exercise of this faculty is fraught with " danger in some cases. Blake, after a while, began to lose the power of distinguishing between the real and imaginary sitters, so that ' (the sequitur is not quite manifest, however) ' he became actually insane, and remained in an asylum for thirty years. " Then his mind was restored to him, and he resumed the use of the pencil ; but the old " evil threatened to return, and he once more forsook his art, soon afterwards to die.' " SAMUEL PALMER. ,j Mr. Richmond, Mr. Linnell, and my father. Mr. Richmond speaks thus :— " What a strange assertion ! I must say, I think Dr. Richardson is more deluded about Blake, than dear old Blake ever was about anything himself." Mr. Linnell treated the matter with characteristic impatience, as "idle stuff" akin to other "lies " about Blake which had been circulated. But my father supplemented his exertions to secure the publication of the truth by writing to The Athena-urn as follows :— " Without alluding to his writings, which are here not in question, I " remember William Blake, in the quiet consistency of his daily life, as one " of the sanest, if not the most thoroughly sane man I have ever known. " The flights of his genius were scarcely more marvellous than the ceaseless " industry and skilful management of affairs, which enabled him on a very " small income to find time for very great works. And of this man the " public are informed that he passed thirty years in a mad-house ! " These three vindications made forty-eight years after Blake's death by men grey in years and not without experience of the world carry some weight, and form as strong an argument in favour of Blake's sanity (in his friends' sense of the word), as any we shall meet with. But on the other side of the question there are many difficulties. Blake is admitted to have had imagination so vivid, powerful, and "dis proportionate " as to " overshadow every other faculty." But it would seem that imagination pure and simple, however vivid it might be, could hardly call up the shades of " Moses and the Prophets, Homer, Dante, Milton : ' All . . . majestic shadows, grey but luminous, and superior to the common height of men,' " and converse with them comfortably by the sea shore. Nor can imagination pure and simple have much to do with a tiny fairy's funeral which troops from beneath a leaf of a flower in the garden, after " a low and pleasant sound." There is no doubt that Blake believed that he saw and asserted that he saw " visions." He described them, conversed with them, and even drew them, transferring his eyes from the paper to his strange sitter and back again just as he did when he drew his wife's portrait. The credulity of the nineteenth century not following this precise channel it became necessary for his admirers to explain the matter, which they have done more or less ingeniously ; but I think we may assure ourselves that had he possessed that " balance of the faculties," which constitutes true sanity, and which his most ardent admirers are obliged to admit that he wanted, the actual appearance of a " vision " after he had conceived it would have been met by incredulity justified by some reasoning process. There is another phase of Blake's visionary faculty which is more attractive because it is not so abnormal as the one of which I have been speaking. He had, he said, a " double vision " or power of seeing always 24 THE LIFE OF \ / "fn action, which with the rapidity and clearness of the photographer's lens changed many outward and visible objects to clear and often beautiful mental pictures.1 In this way a tall thistle changes to an old man grey in years ; and the stars to all the heavenly host shouting for joy. It is there fore no wonder that seeming trifles filled him, as he says, " full of smiles or tears." If we are repelled by his spirits and spectres, we can turn with relief to this transmutation, and find there a'wider and more natural field for a powerful imagination such as his. The precise point, however, at which this imagination outstrips the most powerful kind possible in a sane man it is not quite easy to see. A sane man conceives or sees within him an exquisite landscape — conceives it so clearly that he is able to paint it ; but he does not step forward to enjoy the shade of his groves, or to listen to his sylvan musicians. His Galatea remains a cold impassive statue. With Blake, on the other hand, the mental and bodily vision ap pear to have been permanently confused, and confused so completely, that he was not aware which were the objects beheld by the corporeal, and which by the mental eye. The point of divergence from sanity would appear to be the belief in the reality of the mental picture, and the apparent power of projecting it in such manner as to enable it to be drawn as any other external object would be drawn. The sane man can see his imaginary objects within, and it is immaterial whether he shuts his bodily eyes or not, but_when Blake sat down to draw one of his ghostly portraits and glanced to and fro between his imaginary sitter and his paper, he would appear to have been using first one sense of sight and then the other without being aware of any difference between the two.2 So it was that when Blake was making a drawing of " The Ghost of a Flea " the sitter inconsiderately opened his mouth. The artist being thus " prevented 1 There is a curious passage somewhat illustrating the modus operandi of this faculty, in the concluding notes in his copy of Lavater's Aphorisms. "As we cannot experience " pleasure but by means of others who experience either pleasure or pain thro' us, and as " all of us on earth are united in thought, for it is impossible to think without images- of " somewhat on earth. Soit is impossible to know God or heavenly things without " conjunction with those who know God and heavenly things. Therefore all who converse " in the spirit converse with spirits. For these reasons I say that this Book is written by "consultation with Good Spirits because it is Good, and that the name Lavater is the " amulet of those who purify the heart of man." After this, we may say to ourselves :— " Such tricks hath strong imagination, " That if it would but apprehend some joy, " It comprehends some bringer of that joy ; . . " " He once said to Mr. Richmond, "I can look at a knot in apiece of wood till I am nghtened at it." That he sometimes adapted himself to his company is proved by an anecdote I had from the same source. One day Flaxman called on the old painter and said in the course of conversation, "How do you get on with Fuseli, Blake? I can't get on with him at all. He swears so." "Why," said the other, "I swear at him again " SAMUEL PALME A\ 2', from proceeding with the first sketch" listened to the Ilea's conversation and made a separate study of the open mouth. But for such anecdotes as this we might bring ourselves to think that, as there is an enormous difference between the distinctness of the mental pictures conceived by the highly imaginative and the highly unimaginative man, Blake possessed merely some extension of a normal faculty ; and as we read that, in days of old, men's eyes were sometimes opened for a time upon the invisible world, so, in a degree, it might have been with him. Whatever the solution of this question of Blake's sanity may be it was a question which never once occurred to my father during the whole time of his acquaintance with that human enigma. He saw in him something which, in his opinion, separated him entirely from all but the greatest of the great, and to everything else his eyes were shut. Of the deep and lasting impression made by Blake there were other instances. Besides Mr. Linnell, three artists became fascinated much in the same way and I believe quite independently of each other. These three, Messrs. George Richmond, Edward Calvert, and Francis Oliver Finch, were well- informed men with no lack of individuality, but they did not seem to be disturbed by any suspicion, or to see in the industrious old engraver even any startling eccentricity. Nevertheless their minds may have been, and probably were, by natural bent as well as by training in accord with his on many points ; so that if they had never encountered him they might have followed ideal art at all events in sympathy. Their minds were also so exceptionally well furnished as to enable them very often to read between the lines of Blake's conversation. Yet after all, their devo tion may have been an instance of that mysterious and almost magnetic attraction which, since the days of the prophets and their disciples, has occasionally knit men together in far closer bonds than those of ordinary intercourse. My father wrote of Blake that, "he saw everything through art, and y in matters beyond its range, exalted it from a witness into a judge." I think this may perhaps be the key to what the uncharitable would call the disciples' infatuation. As enthusiastic and by no means unprejudiced artists they saw in Blake's art something which, in their opinion, so excelled as to separate it and him from all else ; and seeing this, they intuitively shut their eyes to other things as a mother is blind to the ugliness of her child. Whether (granting equal personal intimacy) they would have fallen so completely under his influence or believed so com pletely in his sanity if they had never seen one of his artistic works is much to be doubted. In December 1870 my father wrote to Mr. Richmond touching the 26/ THE LIFE OF X piritual Form of Pitt guiding Behemoth, a picture by Blake which was then being exhibited at Burlington House, " Supposing for a moment " that we have been under a delusion, and that he differed from others " not by excellence but by eccentricity, would not the merest glance have " popped our paper bag, seeing him in juxtaposition with the Old Masters "which, through your arrangement, flank and surround him ? " With no cause for partiality and with no pleasant memories of happy hours spent with the kindly visionary, we must admit that he differed from ordinary men by excellence and eccentricity — eccentricity so great that it may be said to have verged upon, if it was not identical with a species of insanity. We may conclude that this was an extraordinary and exceedingly rare phase of mental aberration in unique conjunction with an artistic genius capable of giving birth to works sometimes endued with a grace, a grandeur, and a spiritual beauty of colour, which sets them apart from the creations of ordinary men. That they do so stand apart by themselves (for better or for worse), it is almost impossible to deny ; and we cannot deny that, for the most part, they seem to have been evolved without any direct re ference to nature, or to the canons of art, being stamped with a very peculiar kind of originality. It may also be granted that there is some thing about them which places them beyond the range of ordinary criticism ; just as there is in certain touching kinds of music a quality altogether beyond the learned analysis of the most highly-skilled musician. Both appeal to a subtle and deeply-rooted faculty quite distinct from any which depends on education, and to this faculty, such art or such music never appeal in vain. If Blake was insane, we may yet congratulate ourselves that there was such marvellous method in his madness and especially that he was poor. Freedom from conventionalities, an intellect, like some spring days, all the brighter for the passing clouds, a ceaseless industry, and a " noble poverty " — all these combining enabled him to bequeath to us some handiwork which is strangely beautiful, and some poems both musical and pathetic. Works such as these show "a happiness which often madness hits on, which reason and sanity could not so prosperously be delivered of." The possession of a common centre gave unusual cohesion to the little group of enthusiasts. The " House of the Interpreter," as they called Blake's dwelling, became their rendezvous, and he encouraged their friend ship with the never-failing geniality which seems so different from the changeable moods of insanity. After they had become intimate one with another they began to hold regular monthly meetings at their own homes, for the purpose of comparing their sketches and designs. In these designs, Blake's sway over them is very evident, although it by no means obliterates individuality. The opinions and actions that grew out of the allegiance SAMUEL PALMER. 27 to their master ne'eded some courage, for they involved a separation from those of most other men, the deliberate renunciation of the " main chance," and the certainty of incurring that deeply-dreaded ridicule which is so potent a factor in human life. " Take here," says Lavater in the Aphorisms, "the grand secret — if not of pleasing all, yet of displeasing none -court " mediocrity, avoid originality,1 and sacrifice to fashion." " And go to hell," writes Blake in the margin. To I-avater's description of " heroes with infantine simplicity " Blake adds " This is heavenly." Even from these two passages it is possible to judge in what direction Blake would endeavour to lead his young followers ; and we find accordingly, that they courted originality and affronted fashion with a /est worthy of their teacher ; while, at the same time, they showed not a little of the child-like simpli city of character so dear to him. They inflicted on each other abundant good advice, and in some cases were even known to follow such advice. For instance, my father (then about twenty) belonged to some amateur musical society, and became so fascinated by his violin as to steal precious daylight hours from his painting. But he was warned at last that he was ruining his prospects as an artist, and thereupon he not only immediately withdrew from the society but thenceforth " sang and fiddled only in the evening." About this time, Mr. Linnell was living with his family in part of a small farm-house near the " village '' of Hampstead, still keeping on the house at Cirencester Place for professional purposes. The walls of the five little rooms were encrusted with works of ancient art, and there was a pleasant, homely sentiment of country seclusion about the place. Although Blake professed to hate Hampstead, here he might often be found, stand ing at the door to enjoy the summer air, or playing with the children, or listening to the simple Scotch songs sung by the hostess, the ready tears falling from his eyes the while. Here too, he would often plunge into some animated argument with John Varley (another frequent guest), in whose favourite judicial astrology he found a topic that interested him. A pencil sketch by Mr. Linnell shows them thus occupied. Varley is pointing upwards, and his fine animal physique contrasts very strongly with the peculiar physiognomy of his adversary. Fortunately for my father, Broad Street lay in Blake's way to Hampstead, and they often walked up to the village together. The aged composer of The Songs of Innocence was a great favourite with the children, who \ revelled in those poems and in his stories of the lovely spiritual \ 1 Endymion, writes Lord Beaconsfield, "was intelligent and well-informed, without " any alarming originality or too positive convictions. He listened not only with patience " but with interest to all, and ever avoided controversy. Here are some of the elements "of a man's popularity." 28 ' THE LIFE OF things and beings that seemed to him so real and so- near. Therefore as the two friends neared the farm, a merry troop hurried out to meet them led by a little fair-haired girl of some six years old. To this day she remembers cold winter nights when Blake was wrapped up in an old shawl by Mrs. Linnell, and sent on his homeward way, with the servant, lantern in hand, lighting him across the heath to the main road. It is a matter for regret that th'e record of these meetings and walks and conversations is so imperfect ; for, in the words of one of Blake's disciples, to walk with him was like " walking with the Prophet Isaiah." I have introduced to the reader by their names several of Blake's artistic disciples, and it is strange that these more intimate followers of his should have been distinguished by dispositions in some respects quite un like the dispositions of ordinary men. At the same time they all possessed in a very high degree a rare faculty. My father writes of one of these early companions, Mr. F. O. Finch (a friend of his boyhood), " He had imagina tion, that inner sense which receives impressions of beauty as simply and surely as we smell the sweetness of the rose and the woodbine." It is natural that persons having so much in common between themselves and so little in common with the world at large should become unusually' intimate. Among them none was more remarkable than Mr. Edward Calvert — so original a genius that he is worthy of a closer acquaintance. " A philosopher to whom I am indebted for some rudiments of civiliza tion," wrote my father in 1872, "stood still suddenly one day when we were walking and talking, and uttered these words — ' Light is orange.' They have never been forgotten." This philosopher was Mr. Calvert, who was, I believe, the same "accomplished friend" (then a young man) who, "in the pleasant vale of Bickley . . . sat down under a tree, and solaced him self by repeating aloud in the sonorous original passages from one of Virgil's J Eclogues," to be greeted by an acquaintance with the exclamatipn " O you poor lost creature ! " To this friend, my father says he was indebted for some of the happiest hours of his life, and it was to him that he sent the first words written after its most crushing sorrow. A few months before his death, he writes again to the same gifted person :— " Your kindnesses to " me are among my few pleasures of memory. They were of a rare quality ; " for, as my wife and I love to say, they never varied with my circumstances " which, though never prosperous, were sometimes much the reverse. You "hated me for three days for singing, you 'The British Grenadiers' and " that was all ! " 1 1 Such was this gentleman's refinement of taste, and such his love for ancient Greece and its heroes, that the infliction of 'The British Grenadiers' must have tried him seriously. It was sung by my father precisely for this purpose. He really disliked the sentiment of the song well nigh as much as did his.friend. See Letter LXII. SAMUEL PALMER. 2